Loading...
Agenda 5/23/2023 Item #17A (Ordinance - Rezoning south of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road in Immokalee)17.A 05/23/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex-parte disclosure to be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a rezoning Ordinance for the Williams Farm RPUD to allow up to 336 single family homes on 168f acres located south of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road in Immokalee, in Sections 36 and 31, Township 46 South, Ranges 28 and 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL202100014341 OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above - referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located south of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road in Immokalee, in Sections 36 and 31, Township 46 South, Ranges 28 and 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 168.02+/- acres. The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone the property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Mobile Home Overlay (MHO) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to be known as the Williams Farm RPUD to allow up to 336 single family dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of two parcels owned by Diane R. Williams and Carrie E. Williams, as Co -Trustees of the James E. Williams, Jr. Non -Exempt Estate Tax Sheltered Trust u/a/d 08/13/93. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The 168.02-acre subject site is designated as the Low -Density Residential (LR) development according to the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and is zoned Agricultural with a Mobile Home Overlay (A -MHO). The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for low -density residential development and supporting uses at a based allowed density of 4 units an acre. The applicant is proposing a maximum of 336 DUs across the entire 168.02-acre property yielding a density of around 2 DUs/acre which is half of what the base allowance is. Comprehensive Planning staff has found this project consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan of the County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's March 31, 2022 (revised) Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then -current 2021 and the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity ofpermissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: Packet Pg. 1202 17.A 05/23/2023 a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " The staff has evaluated the TIS submitted with the proposed petition and has found that the proposed Williams Farm PUD will add an estimated +/- 310 PM peak hour two-way trips on the adjacent roadway network. The additional trips will impact the following roadway network links: Link Roadway Link 2021 2022 P.M. Peak 2021 2022 # Location AUIR AUIR Hour Peak AUIR AUIR LOS LOS Direction Remaining Remaining Service Capacity Capacity Volume/Peak Direction 47.0 Lake Carson C C 800/East 207 197 Trafford Road to SR Road 29 9.0 Carson Lake C B 600/North 254 304 Road Trafford Road to Immokalee Drive 86.0 State CR 29 D D 900/South 132 172 Road 29 North to SR 82 85.0 State 9th Street to D D 900/South 108 147 Road 29 CR 29 North 84.0 State CR 29 B B 1,700/West 948 886 Road 29 South to 9' Street Staff notes that the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed Williams Farm PUD development. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan within the 5-year planning period, and the Transportation Planning staff recommends approval of the request. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 102.62 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 55.87 acres of native vegetation is required to be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the Packet Pg. 1203 17.A 05/23/2023 overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC, heard Petition PUDZ-PL20210001434, Williams Farm RPUD on April 6, 2023, and voted 4-0 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. No letters of objection have been received. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site -specific rezone from Rural Agricultural (A) zoned land with a Mobile Home Overlay (MHO) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as the Williams Farm RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezoning is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD Amendment with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Amendment be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? i t . Would the requested RPUD Amendment result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Packet Pg. 1204 17.A 05/23/2023 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD Amendment on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. 111, as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD Amendment request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. -DDP RECOMMENDATION: For the Board to approve the applicant's request to rezone the property to the RPUD zoning district, with the recommendation of the CCPC, that have been incorporated in the attached Ordinance Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report - Williams Farm RPUD (PDF) Packet Pg. 1205 17.A 05/23/2023 2. Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment B - Backup Materials (PDF) 4. Attachment C - Hearing Advertising Sign (PDF) 5. legal ad - agenda ID 24783 (PDF) Packet Pg. 1206 17.A 05/23/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.A Doc ID: 24783 Item Summary: This item requires ex-parte disclosure to be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a rezoning Ordinance for the Williams Farm RPUD to allow up to 336 single family homes on 168f acres located south of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road in Immokalee, in Sections 36 and 31, Township 46 South, Ranges 28 and 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20210001434] Meeting Date: 05/23/2023 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 04/10/2023 9:23 AM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 04/10/2023 9:23 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Growth Management and Community Development Department Diane Lynch County Attorney's Office Derek D. Perry Level 2 Attorney Review Growth Management and Community Development Department James C French Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office County Attorney's Office County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Ed Finn CMO Completed Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 04/10/2023 10:05 AM Completed 04/11/2023 2:28 PM Growth Management DepartmentCompleted 04/11/2023 10:27 PM Completed 05/05/2023 4:35 PM Growth Management Completed 05/16/2023 1:22 PM Completed 05/16/2023 2:27 PM Completed 05/16/2023 2:49 PM 05/16/2023 6:27 PM Completed 05/17/2023 1:10 PM Completed 05/17/2023 4:42 PM 05/23/2023 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1207 17.A.1 Codie' r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: APRIL 6, 2023 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20210001434; WILLIAMS FARM RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) Owner: Agent: Diane R. Williams and Carrie E. Williams, as Daniel DeLisi, AICP Co -Trustees of the James E. Williams, Jr. DeLisi, Inc. Non -Exempt Estate Tax Sheltered Trust a/a/d 520 27th Street 08/13/93 West Palm Beach, FL 33407 1300 N 15th Street, Suite 1 Immokalee, FL 34142 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone the property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Mobile Home Overlay (MHO) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to be known as the Williams Farm RPUD to allow up to 336 single family dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of two parcels owned by James E. Williams, Jr. Trust. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located south of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road in Immokalee, in Sections 36 and 31, Township 46 South, Ranges 28 and 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 168.02+/- acres (see location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to 336 dwelling units at 2.0 (DU/AC) for a project to be known as Williams Farm RPUD. PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Revised: March 6, 2023 Page 1 of 14 Packet Pg. 1208 (Zand (3ndl] WJe=I swBlll!M V£b6000�ZOZld : £8Lvz) andU uajezlsweillim - :podall}leis :luowL]DBIIV c N r a �yPlnllinliinml _ } �V,� y�� x ' aQqYYiy L4_ ii]ii]]i]]].Y�.YYY:Yi"77N q:7 exxL:]. g ��7771 �� YNllhkd YYNiYYi^fl��� �� a1ooIaiYYYY1GQOYOYYYYYYYI Y � + x7m L SYCCYr e�ea e� a�i,■ FOR ooLMU WBIE {� 'I-- ' � Z. �` PPT ¢ ro 1S ls4 S Ob aalgoww �a C BE as r 1 � r I I- z u O L d 1 PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Revised: March 6, 2023 CL CD C 0 1 V CO r o O 0 r- N 0 CN J n N E O a) a_ CL M 0 M U Q J Page 2 of 14 u fC a 17.A.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding the boundaries of Williams Farm RPUD: North: Lake Trafford Road, a two-lane arterial, then developed with single-family residential, with current zoning designations of Residential Single Family (RSF-5) District and Rural Agriculture (A) District. To the southwest of the intersection of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road and to the north of the proposed Williams Farm RPUD is developed with mobile homes, single- family residential, utility lands (Lee County Electric Coop, Inc.), and agricultural lands, with current zoning designations of Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district within a Mobile Home Overlay and Village Residential (VR) District East: Developed with single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Arrowhead PUD (4.3 DU/AC) which is approved for single and multi -family residential, commercial, open space, and preserve areas South: Undeveloped land, with a current zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district within a Mobile Home Overlay West: Developed with agricultural lands, single-family residential, and mobile homes with a current zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district within a Mobile Home Overlay Source: Transportation Consultants, Inc. PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 3 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1210 17.A.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The 168.02-acre subject site is designated as the Low -Density Residential (LR) development according to the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and is zoned Agricultural with a Mobile Home Overlay (A -MHO). The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for low -density residential development and supporting uses at a based allowed density of 4 units an acre. The applicant is proposing a maximum of 336 DUs across the entire 168.02-acre property yielding a density of around 2 DUs/acre which is half of what the base allowance is. Comprehensive Planning staff has found this project consistent with the Immokalee Areas Master Plan of the County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's March 31, 2022 (revised) Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then -current 2021 and the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " The staff has evaluated the TIS submitted with the proposed petition and has found that the proposed Williams Farm PUD will add an estimated +/- 310 PM peak hour two-way trips on the adjacent roadway network. The additional trips will impact the following roadway network links: PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 4 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1211 17.A.1 Link Roadway Link 2021 2022 P.M. Peak 2021 2022 # Location AUIR AUIR Hour Peak AUIR AUIR LOS LOS Direction Remaining Remaining Service Capacity Capacity Volume/Peak Direction 47.0 Lake Carson Road C C 800/East 207 197 Trafford to SR 29 Road 9.0 Carson Lake Trafford C B 600/North 254 304 Road Road to Immokalee Drive 86.0 State Road CR 29 North D D 900/South 132 172 29 to SR 82 85.0 State Road 91 Street to D D 900/South 108 147 29 CR 29 North 84.0 State Road CR 29 South B B 1,700/West 948 886 29 to 911' Street Staff notes that the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed Williams Farm PUD development. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan within the 5-year planning period, and the Transportation Planning staff recommends approval of the request. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 102.62 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 55.87 acres of native vegetation is required to be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or to amend RPUDs shall be in the form of an RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 5 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 0 IL W E M U- U) E 2 0 a as c as E U M r a Packet Pg. 1212 17.A.1 Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The property boundary includes 97.73 acres located within the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand Overlay identified on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. The remaining 71.30 acres are located within the Urban Residential District. A portion of the property has been historically cleared and used for agricultural uses since the early 1960s; the remainder is primarily forested wetlands. The minimum preserve requirement is 51.79 acres (60% of 86.32 acres of native vegetation) within the Lake Trafford Camp Keais Strand Overlay and 4.08 acres (25% of 16.30 acres of native vegetation) is required for the property in the Urban Residential District. The preservation requirement includes the preservation of 1.71 acres of natural flow way, as required by LDC Section 3.05.07.F.3, within the proposed preserve. The applicant has provided 70.68 acres of preservation onsite. The environmental data indicates the proposed project is in an area that has the potential to contain a variety of protected animal species. The listed species observed onsite were two little blue herons (Egretta caerulea) and Caracara (Caracara cheriway). The proposed project does not impact the existing habitats for the American Alligator since the project boundary does not include the large freshwater marshes areas located to the east of the subject property and preserves the remaining freshwater marshes within the subject property. It is anticipated that suitable foraging habitats (freshwater marshes and drainage ditches) will not be impacted by the proposed project; therefore, any wading birds utilizing the site will be unaffected by the proposed project. The subject property is located within core foraging ranges for Wood stork (Mycteria americana) colonies and contains foraging habitat for the Florida Sandhill Crane (Antigone candensis pratensis). Suitable foraging habitat for both the Florida Sandhill Crane and Wood Stork is present within the subject property (Freshwater Forest areas, marsh areas, and open pastureland); however, no individuals were observed onsite. The proposed project is located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) consultation area for Bonneted Bats (Eumops floridanus). Although there are native vegetated areas present onsite, no evidence was found indicating the trees were being utilized by Bonneted Bats. Finally, the property contains potential habitat for caracara (Caracara cheriway); four caracara were observed onsite. Consultation with the US Federal Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) regarding guidelines and permitting requirements will be required prior to construction. The FWC wildlife data indicates Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) is not present in the area. The Environmental Data indicates the southern portion of the subject property falls within FWS Primary Zone for Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi). There were no observations of panthers onsite; however, one Florida panther scratch on a tree was observed. The telemetry data indicates Florida panthers are not abundant within the boundary of the proposed project. The property PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 6 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1213 17.A.1 contains habitats preferred by the Florida panther, including 19.85 acres of Cypress and 67.75 acres of Mixed Wetland Forest; therefore, consultation with FWS to obtain panther mitigation may be required. Prior to approval of the first development order, a second protected species survey of the subject property will be required to ensure construction activity will not impact listed species. The second listed species survey will primarily be focused on avian species; however, all listed species will be evaluated for their presence in and adjacent to the subject property. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utility Review: Public utility staff did not review this petition as the property is not within the Collier County Water -Sewer District. Landscape Review: The applicant is not seeking any deviations related to landscaping. The buffers labeled on the Master Plan are in accordance with the Land Development Code. Stormwater Review: Stormwater Management Section staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Historic Preservation Review: Per county GIS historical maps, the land within the proposed PUD contains two historical sites and there are areas of historical/archaeological probability areas. As such, the applicant submitted a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of Williams Farms Planned Urban Development PUD. This cultural resource assessment was heard before the Historic/Archaeological Preservation Board (HAPB) at its May 20, 2022, meeting and was approved by a vote of 5-0. HAPB accepted the report and all findings, and no conditions were added to this approval. (See Attachment B of Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of Williams Farms Planned Urban Development PUD) Zoning Services Review: This request is a rezone from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district within a Mobile Home Overlay to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to allow the construction of up to 336 single-family dwelling units up to a maximum density of 2.0 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The proposed uses within the Williams Farm RPUD will be consistent with the Low Residential Subdistrict in the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). Within this subdistrict, the maximum allowed density is 4 units per acre without any density bonuses. The applicant has proposed a development that has a density of 2 units per acre which will not require an amendment to the Immokalee Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Within the proposed Williams Farm RPUD boundaries, the minimum PUD setback is 20 feet. The proposed heights have a zoned height of 30 feet and an actual building height of 40 feet. To the south, west, north, and east of the subject property, the structures all have maximum heights of 35 feet. As such, the proposed heights within Williams Farm RPUD are compatible with the immediate neighborhoods. As illustrated in the PUD Master Plan, a 20-foot-wide Type D Buffer is proposed along Lake Trafford Road, a 15-foot Type B buffer is proposed along the northern and western perimeter, and a 50-foot-wide minimum preserve that will meet all buffer requirements will border the eastern and southern boundaries of the PUD. As such, the landscaping buffers and preserves will provide natural transitions around and within the RPUD. The development standards PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 7 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1214 17.A.1 will provide adequate setbacks, limitations on height, and buffers to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water distribution and wastewater collection mains are available within this portion of the Immokalee Water and Sewer District franchise service area, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD. Moreover, stormwater management details related to flood protection, attenuation, floodplain compensation, conveyance, and treatment will be evaluated at the time of South Florida Water Manager District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) and County Site Development Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The buffer labels on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC. In the event that the Eastern portion of the PUD is developed with townhomes, and the preserve on the property to the East does not satisfy the Type B buffer requirements, a Type B buffer will be required along the portion of the East boundary adjacent to the townhomes and the PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 8 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1215 17.A.1 amenity area. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least 60% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Per the 10-12-21 Immokalee Water & Sewer District letter, the plant has the capacity to provide water and sewer services to the project. (See Attachment B) 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. Three deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. See deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 12. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered a proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 9 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1216 17.A.1 Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The properties that abut the project to the east, north, and west allow for residential uses. Therefore, the proposed petition would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries. The zoning map on page 2 of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject parcel. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezoning is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed under the current zoning classification. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed RPUD request is not anticipated to create a stormwater management problem in the area; provided an environmental resource permit that adequately addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, on -site stormwater treatment, attenuation storage, flood plain compensation, and maintenance is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air in adjacent areas. PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 10 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1217 17.A.1 It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air in the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties to the east, north, and west are developed, whereas the property to the south is undeveloped, as previously noted. The basic premise underlying all the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. Because the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed uses and development standards are not permitted, according to the existing classification. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 11 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1218 17.A.1 The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services is consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. Per the 10-12-21 Immokalee Water & Sewer District letter, the plant has the capacity to provide water and sewer services to the project. (See Attachment B) 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking three deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (Right -of -Way Width) "Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.0l.N, which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the internal streets that exclude 10' public utility easements." Petitioner's Justification: The 50' right of way will include 10' travel lanes, curb and gutter, a 5' sidewalk, and significant additional area for landscaping and utilities. The cross-section for the 50' right of way is shown on Page 2 of the master concept plan. The design of the road is more conducing to a residential neighborhood street where travel speeds are slow. The smaller right of way adds to the character of a quiet residential street. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Similar deviations were approved with the Brandon, Argo Manatee, Rockedge, Vincent Acres, The Triad, and The MAC RPUDs, and as such staff sees no PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 12 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1219 17.A.1 detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations." Proposed Deviation #2 (Wall Height) "Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project where abutting an existing public roadway, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination." Petitioner's Justification: The proposed additional wall height is for the perimeter wall only and not for use with individual homes. Along the perimeter, the wall can be designed to not impeded any lines of sight for vehicles entering or exiting the community. The additional wall height [sic] add to the privacy of the residential community and will allow the development to attract increased -value homes to the Immokalee urban area, to the benefit of the entire community. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Similar deviations were approved with the Willow Run RPUD, San Marino PUD, and Avalon of Naples RPUD, and as such staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations." Proposed Deviation #3: (Preservation Areas) "Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC 3.05.07.A.5. which requires that Preservation areas be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow for an access road to bisect the preservation area to connect the property to the south." Petitioner's Justification: The subject property is part of a larger ranch that is approximately 2,000 acres in area. The portion of the property that is proposed for development is the predominately upland area north of Camp Keais Strand. The remainder of the ranch includes portions of Camp Keais Strand and ranch land south of the St[rjand. The wetland areas [sic] the strand extend along the entire southern portion of the PUD, except in the location of an existing powerline/road that currently provides access to the remainder of the property. The Master Concept Plan proposes a connection to the remainder of the property in the location with the least possible impact to wetlands and the St[r]and in order to not landlock the remainder of the property and to provide an interconnect with future development should that be proposed in the future. The proposed road is the least impactful to the environment and therefore provides the best means of access to the remainder property. PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 13 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1220 17.A.1 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Environmental staff recommends the APPROVAL of the deviation request. The access road located along the southern boundary of the property has historically existed and will allow for flexibility of design by using existing access for future development areas located to the south of the subject property. Since maintaining the existing access road prevents the required interconnectivity for the preserved areas required by LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5.; Environmental Services staff supports the deviation request to allow the preservation areas to not be contiguous. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on August 30, 2022, at Immokalee Community Park located at 321 North Pt Street, Immokalee, FL. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at 6:00 p.m. Daniel DeLisi, the agent, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff, and gave a PowerPoint. The presentation consisted of an overview of the proposed RPUD rezoning application. Following the agent's presentation, the meeting was open to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. The issues discussed were public access, powerplant, proposed infrastructure, connectivity to Raulerson Rd, stormwater mitigation, wetlands impacts, transmission lines right- of-way easements along Lake Trafford Road, and Miraham Terrace access. Mr. DeLisi explained that the Miraham Terrace access was a secondary emergency access per direction from the county. Another inquiry was if any studies have been ordered. Mr. DeLisi explained that they submitted an Environmental Study, Traffic Impact Statement, and a Cultural Assessment. There was an inquiry as to the results of the TIS. Mr. DeLisi said there was sufficient capacity. No commitments were made. A copy of the NIM Summary, sign -in sheet, and NIM PowerPoint presentation is included in Attachment B. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is requesting a deviation to allow the preservation areas to not be contiguous as required by LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on March 6, 2023. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) Application/Backup Materials PUDZ-PL20210001434 Williams Farm RPUD Page 14 of 14 Revised: March 6, 2023 Packet Pg. 1221 17.A.2 ORDINANCE NO.2023- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REZONING AGRICULTURAL LAND IN IMMOKALEE TO ALLOW UP TO 336 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A MOBILE HOME OVERLAY (MHO) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS THE WILLIAMS FARM RPUD TO ALLOW UP TO 336 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON 168f ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD AND LITTLE LEAGUE ROAD IN IMMOKALEE, IN SECTIONS 36 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGES 28 AND 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PL20210001434) WHEREAS, Daniel DeLisi, AICP, of DeLisi, Inc., representing Diane R. Williams and Carrie E. Williams, as Co -Trustees of the James E. Williams, Jr. Non -Exempt Estate Tax Sheltered Trust u/a/d 08/13/93, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 36 and 31, Township 46, Ranges 28 and 29, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural 0 M Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Mobile Home Overlay (MHO) to a Residential Planned a Unit Development (RPUD) for a 168± acre parcel to be known as Williams Farm RPUD in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The [2 1 -CPS-02177/1769490/11 Williams Farms RPUD Page 1 of 2 2/21 /2023 Packet Pg. 1222 17.A.2 appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Derek D. Perry Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Permitted Uses Development Standards Master Plan Legal Description Deviations Developer Commitments 2023. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA [21-CPS -02177/ 1769490/ 1 ] Williams Farms RPUD Page 2 of 2 2/21 /2023 Rick LoCastro, Chairman Packet Pg. 1223 17.A.2 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES Williams Farm RPUD A Residential Planned Unit Development PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 336 single family dwelling units shall be permitted in this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL: Tract R A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units • Detached Single Family • Attached Single Family and Townhouses Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures, utility buildings and infrastructure. 2. Walls, berms, signage, and development excavations. 3. Gatehouses and access control structures. 4. Recreational uses and facilities including swimming pools for residents and their guests. 5. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales, and marketing. Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page l of 12 Packet Pg. 1224 17.A.2 6. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 7. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. AMENITY AREA: Tract AA A. Principal Uses: 1. Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve the residents and guests. 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickleball courts and basketball courts, parks, dog parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, gazebos, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve the residents and their guests only. 4. Tennis clubs, health spas, fitness facilities and other indoor recreational uses (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 2. Walls, berms, signage, and development excavations. 3. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 2 of 12 Packet Pg. 1225 17.A.2 PRESERVE: Tract P A. Principal Uses: 1. Preserve B. Accessory Uses: Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation for environmental permitting. 3. Passive recreation areas, per LDC requirements. 4. Water management as allowed by the LDC. Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 3 of 12 Packet Pg. 1226 17.A.2 EXHIBIT B LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Williams Farm RPUD A Residential Planned Unit Development Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for the land uses within the Williams Farm RPUD. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DETACHED A ACHEDSIN0LE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE , ,h. FAMILY & AMENITY AREA FAMILY TOWNHOUSE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 4,200S.F.PER 2,200 S.F. PER LOT 10,000 S.F. PER LOT LOT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 35 FEET 18 FEET 100 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,200 S.F 1,000 S.F 700 SQ FT MINIMUM FRONT YARD 25 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD 5 FEET 5/0 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM REAR YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM PUD SETBACK 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET BETWEEN STRUCTURES MAXIMUM HEIGHT 30/40 FEET 30/40 FEET 30/40 FEET Zoned/Actual ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ,t=, MINIMUM FRONT 25 FEET 20 FEET 25 FEET MINIMUM SIDE 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM REAR 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MINIMUM PUD SETBACK 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned 30 FEET 30 FEET 30 FEET Actual 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures BH = Building Height Footnotes: Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 4 of 12 Packet Pg. 1227 17.A.2 GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of subdivision plat approval. Note: Nothing in this PUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 5 of 12 Packet Pg. 1228 17.A.2 EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 6 of 12 Packet Pg. 1229 (Zand andb wae=l swe1IIIM VEMOUZOZld £8LVZ) eoueulpap posodOJd - d;uawyoe)jv :;uawyoej;b c N M Q N r N r U LL a) � o a w w V Z = f �o Q 5`�a s Z w LL (L c/7 z, Ui N w it W fV Q cc LL Ln WAG_ m G w N QJ�wO� LU Q U N cn cnw.~ CO zI- �� J Z � Oc w_Jw- w J O �a LZw �; > OZH�QU LLj SS U i S LL ZOKzH� W NXH <wCD d + + i � W a M N ¢ or w W :. J Q H O LL W Z L Q �J a > w J Z //[[[[((F��—FQ�� LU Ix i i w W mz� L��a��=� /U zmz� i i aw�H y ��c�< o`L aw��� Qo 0 ?�¢ow��Qi i + w^ + + aW��wE�z�zw���''TC�WF� i + i>v + z C9�mw Wo w�wLL`nN W � wcrw0_' + + + W a i Z�M�NW a l-W a. �cn�'i� J/-ll mgw i i i iw i O i.�w¢v,Nw y w qo 4 S W o i i i o i i w W¢ o 0 N � mIQ (L + i iLL � + j w Z 0 _ wm OQ z wa ZWLL M + + �A.....;1 > + + + i tr w U O LJJ N Q Z Y w O¢ W Owz' i LL L7L Q0U)CL w af Cl) ' Cj U2 J S v :+ + + + p i F J //��r� <w :w Y' 15 �5 ch ...........�. i + i m a Z z avo8 3nE)V3l 31llll a ¢ N •--- ••••• p _ / W Q w wo`c. p -- c i i i + Z¢�mv�i z m� '�Q J /�/- i� �< i ozNag Wz j ovG'rwi,�2al-� aj ,'i,,l-i.� / LL- ,1 - i--�- -� 3 - WZOX� •jR a w�>w<�Za� �m z n/ 1 i� i i i �r�LUZ �z LL N • z O zo2 (.J9 11 .. +w + + + m w 7W o����� J 1 a++ D c� m D W •;+p + + + o Q Q U Q + + w LL •914 Q c� � C LY I g o + + i w� ❑ = I 11 + i i w�bC Va mazKm O YnNW� qC I �_�� 1 •p + LL3^ w rmc x LL L)oz -- � WI �I \ \ 3a ww :am I i - + o- w¢ LL 5 ¢ I \ I LU LLL ozmw I i wm �WU� i S i + ❑¢ amCal w w I {{: j f s + w �a z tit / / ice•+ + i w wm— z 5 G W~0w�wZn =a n�=woo U Jx U~J a Z J w w a N z 0 z`-:R� I 1 "o� z 005 Wa i u+ yOoH �UJ=f�J w 7 + + + �MFa�v (]VONa.. ...i + + o LLOWC9��IIVH LU Ix TO to p 2 o J > W? � H C) UM,! DU'Q I I I I I I LL `t �NNa W�a 30V81NOIAVl Zm� ¢w Z >ym�� MV � y)Z�U oO LU J C Z �N m OVmmWc7W N �ZCII U a in _ m2, LMo¢ m¢ 3w m (n O LL W cc N IJJ w N o w LL a 0 0 a co Wd 04:L £ZOZ/9ZR `JMO'9A3H d0W SW2IVd SWVIIIIM\k,d00 - dOW - 903Z09199\Sli81HX310VOOInV-00\3NOZ38 WaVJ SWVIIIIM ZO.9199\SW2JVd SINVIIIIM'99\LLOZ ON`dlGO 17.A.2 LEGEND P.U.D. ACCESS P.U.D. EMERGENCY ONLY ACCESS AA AMENITY AREA R RESIDENTIAL AREA USE AREA . BOUNDARY O BOUNDARY PERIMETER BUFFER ® LAKE PRESERVE EXISTING CREEK (FLOW WAY TO REMAIN) C _ _ 7 RIGHT OF WAY 10.0' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT I�-i I I 5,0. LAND USE USE AREA (AC) PERCENT RESIDENTIAL 66.18 39.39% AMENITY AREA 3.50 2.08 % RIGHT OF WAY 12.39 7.37% LAKES 15.27 9.09% PRESERVE 70.68 42.07% TOTAL 168.02 100% 2' TYPE " F" CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) PRESERVE & OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT PRESERVE REQUIREMENT LAKE TRAFFORD CAMP KEAIS STRAND OVERLAY: (INLCUDES 1.10 AC NATURAL FLOWAY TO REMAIN) 60% OF 86.32 ACRES = 51.79 ACRES REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY (INLCUDES 0.61 AC NATURAL FLOWAY TO REMAIN) 25% OF 16.30 ACRES = 4.08 ACRES TOTAL PRESERVE AREA =51.79 AC + 4.08 AC = 55.87 AC TOTAL REQUIRED PRESERVE: 55.87 ± ACRES. TOTAL PRESERVE PROVIDED: 70.68 ± ACRES. OEPN SPACE REQUIREMENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 60% PROVIDED OPEN SPACE: 60% TYPICAL R.O.W SECTION 10.0' 10.0' NOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE, ALL AREA, LAKES, EASEMENTS, AND ROADS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THROUGH LOCAL, STATE, & FEDERAL PERMITTING DEVIATIONS QSEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC, SECTION 6.06.01.N, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOCAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET, TO ALLOW A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH FOR THE INTERNAL STREETS THAT EXCLUDE 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS. SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.03.02.C, ® WHICH PERMITS A MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT OF 6' IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISKICTS, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT OF 8' ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT WHERE ABUTTING AN EXISTING PUBLIC ROADWAY, AND ALLOW A 12' TALL WALL/ BERM COMBINATION. SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC 3.05.07 A.5. WHICH © REQUIRES THAT PRESERVATION AREAS BE INTERCONNECTED WITHIN THE SITE AND TO ADJOINING OFF -SITE PRESERVATION AREAS OR WILDLIFE CORRIDORS, TO ALLOW FOR AN ACCESS ROAD TO BISECT THE PRESERVATION AREA TO CONNECT THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. 10.0' PUBLIC �~ UTILITY EASEMENT 13.0' I r0 5.0' I�-Q Q ' J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING, P.A. J�,� . 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, SUITE 102 WILLIAMS FARMS RAIlkESTERO, FLORIDA 33928 PHONE: (239) 405-9148 EN G FAX: (239) 288-2537 MASTER CONCEPT PLAN - EXHIBIT C WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM REV DATE: 02/25/23 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2 Packet Pg. 1231 17.A.2 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE; THENCE SOUTH 00°21'38" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, 2699.05 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 890 FORMER STATE ROAD 850) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE 284.00 FEET EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 11,419.20 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 025'30", AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88025'32" EAST 283.99 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 87°42'47" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, 504.33 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF "ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD - PHASE ONE" SUBDIVISION AS PER THE RECORD PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 42 PAGES 94 THROUGH I I I OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00°38'57" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 1427.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16°24'48" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 557.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86°36'35" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 550.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°17'53" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 681.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°15'02" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 570.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°47'04" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 128.70 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY LINE WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 89°09'18" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, 1937.47 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE SOUTH 89'06'17" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, 2652.93 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 00°26'43" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 /4 OF SAID SECTION 36, 1596.83 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE NORTH 88059'49" EAST 2653.46 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST; THENCE NORTH 00016'34" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, 1286.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 168.028 ACRES MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, REFERENCING THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983, 2011 ADJUSTMENT (NAD 83/2011). Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 9of12 Packet Pg. 1232 17.A.2 EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS Williams Farm RPUD A Residential Planned Unit Development Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N, which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the internal streets that exclude 10' public utility easements. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project where abutting an existing public roadway, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC 3.05.07 A.S. which requires that Preservation areas be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow for an access road to bisect the preservation area to connect the property to the south. Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 10 of 12 Packet Pg. 1233 17.A.2 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS Williams Farm RPUD A Residential Planned Unit Development PURPOSE: The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafterthe Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is James E Williams Jr. Trust or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitmentsto a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. TRANSPORTATION: A. Access will be provided to the property south of the PUD consistent with the Master Concept Plan. B. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD may not exceed 310 two-way PM Peak Hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 11 of 12 Packet Pg. 1234 17.A.2 LANDSCAPING: A. The PUD shall provide buffer areas consistent with LDC Section 4.06.02 and the Master Concept Plan. Where buffers overlap preserve areas, the preserve may serve as the buffer, however, additional plantings may be required within the preserve areas to meet minimum buffer requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. The Project has 102.62 ± acres of native vegetation. The Project will preserve a minimum of 60 percent of the site's native vegetation within the Lake Trafford Camp Keais Strand Overlay and 25 percent of the site's native vegetation outside of the Overlay. The minimum required preserve for the PUD is 55.87 ± acres. The Project is providing 70.68± acres. B. Residents and construction/maintenance personnel will be informed by the managing entity or owner, that wading birds are protected species through the availability and distribution of educational materials. Residents and construction/maintenance personnel will also be provided with educational materials by the managing entity or owner, concerning the prevention of problematic encounters with American alligators, Florida panthers and Florida black bears. C. Butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed in various locations across the site. Before the initiation of clearing activities, the developer shall relocate all, but no more than ten, butterfly orchids (encyclia tampensis) from the development footprint to the preserve, until as many as ten orchids exist in the preserve. PUBLIC UTILITIES: A. Development in the PUD will be serviced by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Williams Farm RPUD PL20210001434 December 16,2022 Page 12 of 12 Packet Pg. 1235 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED OO DAU WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER G. Z(P Otflo Y' 6 SIGNATU OF APPLICANT O AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Mi1nTh�e 1for(e�go�in�g� instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me thisday of , 202-� by 1lI I�L�l�iddsS� personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath.MJA� 11 Jam` - Signature 6VNotary Public Notary Public State of Florida Kelly M Mann +� My Commission GG 323677 ' �� 1%1 q Expires 07/07/2023 1 j 1 °"` Printed Lnted Natik of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) 17.A.4 Packet Pg. 1237 17.A.5 NAPLESNEWS.COM 1 WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2023 1 13A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICEVI' TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE �-L Notice is herebygiven that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commlasforms (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on May 23, 2023, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMmISSMERS OF COLLIER COIN'11, FLORtDA, REZONING AGRICULTURAL LAND IN IMMOKALEE TO ALLOW UP TO 336 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRIWLTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A MOBILE HOME OVERLAY (MIND) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 6"D) IONING DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS THE WILLIAMS FARM RPUD TO ALLOW UP TO 336 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON 1682 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD AND LITTLE LEAGUE ROAD IN IMMOKALEE, IN SECTIONS 36 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGES 28 AND 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL202100014341 . ......... 14 project w sntlox si ' Lake Trafford " O N r ) W"Main N A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available Cl) 00 I- for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. le All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County item to be addressed. Individual speakers Manager prior to presentation of the agenda be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak 00 will on behalf of an organization or group IS encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on ti � N spokesperson for a group or organization an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submdtLd f7 to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. before the Board will become a permanent part of All materials used in presentations C the record. d As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage publ[C involvement, the public comments remotely, as well as cn will have the opportunity to provide public in during this proceeding.- Individuals who would like to participate person, remotely should. register through the link provided within the specific Calendar of Events on the County website at ca @ eventimeeting entry on the after the agenda is tm www.coltiorcountyfl.gov/our-oounty/visnors/Galendar-of-events posted on the County Websne. Registration should be done in advance of the public the meeting notice. Individuals d meeting, or any deadline specified within public who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how .r they canparticipate remotely ; in this meeting. Remote participation is provided The County. is not responsible for technical N � as a courtesy and is at the use's risk. issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at CO 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@coRiercountyli.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to Q record of the proceedings ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. K you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of Collier County Facilities Management Division, certain assistance. Please contact the located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICK LOCASTRO, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEau Packet Pg. 123 D-GCIt05337aa11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑■ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION James E. Williams, Jr. Non -Exempt Estate Tax Sheltered Trust u/a/d 08/13/93, A/K/A the James E. Wiliams, Jr. Trust Name of Property Owner(s): Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 1300 N 15th Street, STE 1 City: Immokalee State: FL ZIP: 34142 Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Daniel DeLisi, AICP Firm: DeLisi, Inc. Address: 520 27th Street Telephone: 239-913-7159 E-Mail Address: dan@delisi-inc.com Cell: Fax: City: West Palm Beach State: FL Cell: Fax: ZIP: 33407 Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: A -MHO Zoning district(s) to the =0 zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Ranchland Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential community Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No.: N/A PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 36/31 / IL_J 28/29 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached. Plat Book: Page #: Size of Property: Property I.D. Number: 00057320005, 00072520000 ft. x ft. = irregular Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 168.0 +/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: South of Lake Trafford Road in Immokalee, FL. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑ Commercial ❑■ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N A/RSF-5/A-MHO/VR Low/Medium Density Residential S A -MHO Low Density Residential E MPUD/A-MHO Low Density Residential W A -MHO Low/Medium Density Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached. ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Eastern Collier County Chamber of Commerce Mailing Address: 1300 North 15th Street, Suite #2 City: Immokalee State: FL Zip: 34142 Name of Homeowner Association: Immokalee Civic Association Mailing Address: 502 E. New Market Rd City: Immokalee State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Immokalee Water and Sewer District Mailing Address: 1020 Sanitation Rd. City: Immokalee State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Immokalee CRA Mailing Address: 750 South Fifth Street City: Immokalee State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: March 4, 2020 City: State: Zip: 34142 Zip: 34142 ZIP: 34142 ZIP: Page 3 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N/A Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): James E. Williams, Jr. Non -Exempt Estate Tax Sheltered Trust u/a/d 08/13/93, A/K/A the James E. Wiliams, Jr. Trust Address: 1300 North 15th Street, STE 1 City: Immokalee State: FL ZIP: 34142 Telephone: 239-657-5188 Cell: 239-707-7137 E-Mail Address: williamsfarmsl@aol.com Address of Subject Property (If available): NA City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 31/46/ 29/28 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Fax: NA Property I.D. Number: 00057320005 , 00072520000 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System 0 C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: Immokalee Water & Sewer District (IWSD) d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ d. Private System (Well) ❑ Provide Name: Immokalee Water & Sewer District (IWSD) Total Population to be Served: 840 Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 210,00o GPD Average Daily: 84,000 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 323,194 GPD Average Daily: 84,000 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: NA March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. NA -IMMOKALEE WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS OFF -SITE. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. NA TO BE IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Goter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. col I iercou nty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252=2400FAX:(239)252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do herjby swear o�affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as �J 2MGS L kJ I t I ) CGyY1 S Jr � 5-)— (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Daniel DeLisi, AICP legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with �II terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. w 'a4yL Owner r Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of�pl day of (,)fAti3" , 20� by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license WL 50Z " logs 3 " dl L�l S� Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: March 4, 2020 ical presence or❑online notarization this AMANDAVILLA ;,,; MY COMIUISSiON # GG 359838 ,,; c�,' EXPIRES: July 28, 2023 rag BOfIdAd TigU iNafary PubNc UBdCAY11l0r� Page 8 of 11 Goer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as, rvV3 & L / 1301?N/ i3=h+ 6fWse4�!-/. I z/n/ny/lei 3VILI2� (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Josh Evans, P.E. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County, 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit 4elopment and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with allerms conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of day of OLk\0-Q, V, , 20Z1, by (printed name of owner or qualifi� Such persons) Notary Public must check applicable box: :]Are personally known to me gHas produced a current drivers license W14I2 Has produced as identification. Notary Signature cal presence or❑online notarization this i..... ...•.. i .1.. 7!.:L� March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 ❑ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %2" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ❑ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ElConservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ I City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: 4SSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ❑ Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX9 (239) 252-6358 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5�" and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Si ature of Petitioner or Agent a44`'I Printed named of signing party /D Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 DELISI Land ���r�g6 „vnte ,-b �, REZONING EVALUATION CRITERIA WILLIAMS FARM PUD The applicant is submitting the attached PUD application to allow the construction of a residential community in accordance with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The intended use of the property is for a single-family neighborhood with recreational amenities on the south side of Lake Trafford Road and generally north of the Camp Keais Strand flowway. The proposed development is seeking approval for 2 dwelling units per acre, well within the based density of 4 du/acre allowed in the Low Residential Sub -District in the IAMP. The development will provide additional housing opportunities within the Immokalee community, add more critical mass to bring new amenities to the area. The subject property is ideally located, with direct access to Lake Trafford Road. With infrastructure in place, the subject property is ideally located for implementing the Immokalee Area Master Plan's goal of adding new housing opportunities in the community. The Concept Plan has been designed with consideration of the natural features on site and to create a walkable community with a centralized amenity feature. The entrance alignment is set in order to avoid impacts to the residential community to the north and access is shown on the concept plan to future development to the south. Surrounding Uses The proposed PUD is located in an area with surrounding residential and agricultural uses. The existing land use pattern is a mix of large and small lot residential units on the west, east and north of the subject property. To the south of the subject property is land owned by the applicant and used as a cattle ranch, which includes portions of Camp Keais Stand. The land to the south is anticipated for future development within both the IAMP and the RLSA. In accordance with LDC Section 10.02.08 and 10.02.13, the Standards of Approval for a rezoning and a Planned Unit Development application, below is an analysis of how the subject property meets the criteria in the land development code. LDC Section 10.02.08 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed PUD application is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The future land use map designates the property as Urban Residential on the Future Land Use 1 1 P a g e Map and within the Low Residential Sub -District in the Immokalee Area Master Plan IAMP). According to The Low Residential Subdistrict in the IAMP The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for low density residential development and supporting uses. Mobile homes are allowed pursuant to the provisions of IAMP Policy 5.1.4. Residential densities are allowed as provided below, except for properties within the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay. Base Density: Four (4) dwelling units pergross acre. Maximum Density: Eight (8) dwelling units pergross acre, inclusive of all density bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available density bonuses. The subject property is being rezoned to Planned Unit Development consistent with the Low Residential Subdistrict. The proposed density is 2 dwelling units per acre (336 units) and will consist of a mix of single family and potentially townhouse units, with ancillary amenities for the residential community. Portions of the subject property are located within the Camp Keais Strand System Overlay. The IAMP places limited on properties within the Overlay as follows: The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP, Policy 6.2.4(4), identifies possible high -quality wetland systems connected to the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand system within the Immokalee Urban Area. These wetlands require greater protection measures than wetlands located in other portions of the Immokalee Urban Designated Area. These wetlands are identified on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map by the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay (LT/CKSSO). The Density and Intensity Blending provisions of this Master Plan may be utilized for lands within this LT/CKSSO. The maximum allowable gross density for lands within the LT/CKSSO is the base density established for the applicable Subdistrict. Lands within the LT/CKSSO are not eligible for any density bonuses, including by right. Essential Services shall be limited to: those necessary to ensure public safety; and those necessary to serve permitted uses, such as private wells and septic tanks, utility lines, lift stations, and water pumping stations. The proposed PUD is not requesting bonus density for property within the Overlay. Within the PUD however, the Camp Keais Strand portion of the property is being reserved for potential future density blending with properties under common ownership to the south in the Rural Land Stewardship Area. These properties, as discussed in the Pre -application Conference are eligible as a future Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) under the density blending policies of both LDC Section 2.05.02 B.3. and the Density and Intensity Blending policy in the IAMP. 2 1 P a g e Policy 5.6 requires that "New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code." The proposed development will be compatible with the surrounding residential uses through the setbacks and buffering that is required. Further, the proposed residential community preserves the most environmentally sensitive areas of the property and designs the residential uses to be in harmony with the natural features on site. Policy 7.1 requires the County to "encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads..." The subject property is located directly fronting Lake Trafford Road, an arterial road. Policy 7.2 encourages "internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals." Notably, Policy 7.2 is not a requirement but a policy that encourages loop roads presumably, where feasible and where is would be of benefit to the surrounding roadway network. The subject property does not have direct access to any other roads that would create a loop for an alternative access to Lake Trafford Road. This Policy is not applicable to the subject application. Policy 7.3 encourages new and existing development "to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element." Notably, Policy 7.3 is not a requirement but a policy that encourages interconnects, where feasible and where is would be of benefit to the surrounding roadway network. The subject property does not have direct access to any other roads that would create an alternative access to Lake Trafford Road. This Policy is not applicable to the subject application. Policy 7.4 requires the County to "encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types." The proposed PUD has been designed as a walkable community with a centralized amenity feature and significant open space areas. The introduction of a new amenitized residential community in Immokalee with provide for a mix of housing options and prices. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element requires "all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request 3 1 P a g e that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved." There is no significant impact associated with a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1 requires "minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria" which for the subject property, outside of the Camp Kaeis Stand Overlay would be a minimum of 25% of the native vegetation on site. Policy 6.1.2 requires that "for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System located within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of the Neutral Lands standards in "b" below... b. A minimum of 60% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site area shall be preserved..." The subject property contains areas both within and outside of the Camp Keais Strand Overlay. Therefore, there are two separate native preservation requirements for each area. The total requirement for native vegetation, in accordance with the submitted environmental analysis and included below, is 55.9 acres. The proposed development is preserving a minimum of 70.68 acres of native vegetation on site, well exceeding the requirements of CCME Policies 6.1.1 and 6.1.2. Preserve requirement Lake Trafford Camp Keais Strand Overlay: 60% of 86.3 acres = 51.8 acres Remainder of the Property: 25% of 16.3 = 4.1 acres Total Required Preserve: 55.9 + acres Total Preserve Provided: 70.68 + acres Objective 7.1 requires the County to "direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats." The Master Concept Plan demonstrates that the development has been designed to direct urban uses to the north of the subject property, closer to existing development and urban services while preserving on site vegetation within and flowing into the Camp Keais Strand well in excess of the Collier County GMP and LDC requirements. 4 1 P a g e 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern is a mix of large and small lot residential units on the west, east and north of the subject property. To the south of the subject property is land owned by the applicant including portions of Camp Keais Stand and farm area anticipated for future development within both the IAMP and the RLSA. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD would not create an isolated district unrelated to nearby districts. The proposed PUD is of similar nature to the development to the east and north. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The proposed PUD implements the Immokalee Area Master Plan through designating a new residential community in an area designated for low density residential development. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. In order to establish and promote Immokalee as a vibrant community quality neighborhoods and housing conditions are necessary. The IAMP recognizes this in Goal 2 and Objective 2.3 which promote diverse housing opportunities and mechanisms to promote the development of quality neighborhoods. The proposed PUD implements this goal by proposing a quality neighborhood in the Immokalee Urban Area. GOAL 2: TO PROVIDE QUALITY NEIGHBORHOODS FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF THE IMMOKALEE URBAN AREA. OBJECTIVE 2.3: The County will continue to explore and provide innovative programs and regulatory reforms to reduce development costs and promote quality neighborhoods and a full range of housing for all Immokalee residents. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will enhance the neighborhood by provided a quality amenitized 5 1 P a g e neighborhood, consistent with the IAMP. The uses that are immediately adjacent to the subject property will be adequately separated and screened. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. As demonstrated by the attached TIS, the proposed PUD will not create or excessively increase traffic on surrounding land uses. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Any future development will need to obtain an environmental resource permit from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and by State Rule will not be permitted to create drainage problems on surrounding properties. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Given the required and proposed setbacks, along with the proposed maximum building height, the proposed change will not reduce light and air to adjacent uses. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change should have a positive impact on property values in the area by providing needed quality housing in Immokalee contributing the creation of a more vibrant and diverse community. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or enhancement of adjacent properties. Properties to the north, west and east are already developed. The property to the south is under common ownership with the applicant and is being reserved for future development or preservation, consistent with the IAMP. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change does not constitute a special privilege as it is specifically designated for low density residential development in the IAMP and consistent with the properties to the east and north. 6 1 P a g e 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning is not consistent with the intent of the IAMP, which seeks to promote the development of quality neighborhoods and increased housing stock to diversify the Immokalee community and economy. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed development is consistent with the needs of the community. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The proposed PUD provides for a somewhat unique opportunity in the Immokalee Community to have an amenitized residential neighborhood along Lake Trafford Road. There are very few properties of this size that can create this type of new neighborhood for the community. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The proposed development is designed around the environmental features on the site so that the sensitive portions will not be developed. The proposed development areas are suitable for the uses proposed. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. The subject property is in an area where public services are sufficient to serve the proposed development. The property is located along and with direct access to an arterial road. Water and wastewater service can be provided by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. All other serves such as police and fire are sufficient to serve future residential development. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. LDC Section 10.02.13 7 1 P a g e a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. As stated in the responses above there is nothing unique about the physical characteristics of the site that would impact its development. The development is being designed around the environmental features on site. The property is served by an arterial road allowing for easy accessibility. Both potable water and wastewater will be provided through the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Any future development will need to obtain an environmental resource permit (ERP) from the South Florida Water Management District, which will address drainage and prevent off -site flooding. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The subject property is under unified control. If the property is subdivided in the future, development commitments and the water management system will be maintained by a master homeowners association or similar entity. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed PUD is in conformance with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan and the Immokalee Area Master Plan. A detailed description of consistency is provided in the response to LDC Section 10.02.08 (1) above. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed PUD is compatible with surrounding uses and development. To the north and east are similar large and small lot residential developments. The access road to the north is designed to intersect with Lake Trafford Road to the east of the community to the north to avoid compatibility concerns. The property to the south is owned by the applicant and is being reserved for future development, consistent with the IAMP. To the east are a mix of small and large lot units and vacant land, which will adequately screened from the proposed development. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. 8 1 P a g e The proposed PUD shows significant and much more than adequate open space on site to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Adequate facilities are in place to serve the proposed development. The proposed PUD will be completed in a single phase. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. There is nothing in the proposed application that would limit the ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The PUD master plan shows a road that will go south to an area that will be future development in accordance with the IAMP and the RLSA. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The PUD Conforms to the Land Development Code. In conclusion, the proposed Planned Unit Development is to allow for a residential community in the Low Residential Sub -Element as the property is designated on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. The development is being proposed in conformance with and in furtherance of the Immokalee Area Master Plan, meets the intent of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, meets the design requirements of the Land Development Code, and therefore should be granted. 9 1 P a g e Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL. tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the L7 C. percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE. list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Diane R. Williams, 1300 North 15th St., Suite 1, Immokalee , FL 34142 James E. Williams, III, 1300 North 15th St., Suite 1, Immokalee , FL 34142 Susan W. Blust, 1300 North 15th St., Suite 1, Immokalee , FL 34142 Carrie E. Williams, 1300 North 15th St., Suite 1, Immokalee , FL 34142 John D. Williams, 1300 North 15th St., Suite 1, Immokalee , FL 34142 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 C T County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net H e. f. R 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP list the name of the ana/or umitea Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE. with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the or partners: Name and Address I % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Cokr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 or ( AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION I Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date LVI24 1 e W t f1 �l l�- Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Goter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. col I iercou nty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252=2400FAX:(239)252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do herjby swear o�affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as �J 2MGS L kJ I t I ) CGyY1 S Jr � 5-)— (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Daniel DeLisi, AICP legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with �II terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. w 'a4yL Owner r Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of�pl day of (,)fAti3" , 20� by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license WL 50Z " logs 3 " dl L�l S� Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: March 4, 2020 ical presence or❑online notarization this AMANDAVILLA ;,,; MY COMIUISSiON # GG 359838 ,,; c�,' EXPIRES: July 28, 2023 rag BOfIdAd TigU iNafary PubNc UBdCAY11l0r� Page 8 of 11 Goer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as, rvV3 & L / 1301?N/ i3=h+ 6fWse4�!-/. I z/n/ny/lei 3VILI2� (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Josh Evans, P.E. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County, 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit 4elopment and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with allerms conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of day of OLk\0-Q, V, , 20Z1, by (printed name of owner or qualifi� Such persons) Notary Public must check applicable box: :]Are personally known to me gHas produced a current drivers license W14I2 Has produced as identification. Notary Signature cal presence or❑online notarization this i..... ...•.. i .1.. 7!.:L� March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 FOR,PETITION NUMBERS(S) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION PL20210001434 I a 2 t .6 applicable) of J under oath, that (print name), as 3 (title, if nrs' tJiG//�wrs�1/ %n� (company, If applicable), swear or affirm am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Daniel DeLisi, AICP and Josh Evans, PE to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee': • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Unde enalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the c - stated in it are true. /1 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoin instrument was acknowleged before me by means of [physic presence or online notarization this day of C. t/�D Pr( , 20� � by (printed name of owner or qualifier) t1LWQ Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 0 Are personally known to me M6 Has produced a current drivers license w Vl,53 2- � Q�j -(p �i � D � AMANDAVILLA *: W COMMISSION # GG 359836 Has produced as identification.< EXPIRES:JuIy28,2023 rEoA �o`' Bonded 7W Notary Pubk Uncle Mlm Notary Signature: CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 SUMMARY OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING Williams Farm RPUD PUDZ-PL20210001434 August 30, 2022, at 5:30 p.m. at Immokalee Community Park The meeting started at 5:30 pm with a presentation of the RPUD application by Daniel DeLisi. • DeLisi described the property location • The property's designation in the Immokalee Area Master Plan • The proposed Master Concept Plan, access and buffers • Uses for the site • Josh Evans, P.E. reviewed how the stormwater system on the property will be designed. The following questions were asked: Question: Are you showing your primary and secondary access. Answer: Yes. Primary access is to Lake Trafford Road. Secondary access is to Miraham Terrace. Question: Are you showing access through the substation on Raulerson? Answer: No, we do not have access to Raulerson. Question: When the power station was built they put a sign about preserve areas on that property. Are you impacting any land in that area? Answer: We are not impacting any area on the Power station property. Any wetland impacts will need to go through review by the State. The preserve area on this property are located within Camp Kaeis Strand at the south end of the property. Question: What kind of impacts are you having to the powerline easement? Answer: We are not impacting any powerline easements in this proposed project. Question/Comment: What is the purpose of the Miraham Terrace entrance. It won't help anyone to use the access road because it is west of the main access. 11Page Answer: Staff has asked us to include this as an emergency access only in case something blocks then entrance and there is an emergency where vehicles need to access the community. Question: What are the next steps? Answer: We are still working with the County to get the application sufficient and ready for public hearing. We will then go to the Planning Board and then the County Commission. After that the developer will need to obtain an environmental resource permit, a Section 404 permit from DEP and a site development permit from Collier County. After the zoning process we expect a 2-year timeframe before construction of homes. Question: As far as stormwater, staff had several projects to deal with flooding. Is this part of that effort? Answer: We have had conversations with the County on building a stormwater lake. We have also had discussions on the County wanting to build ball fields, but that is not part of this zoning. Question: Will Williams put in infrastructure and have municipal water and reuse for irrigation? Answer: We are not sure if the Williams family will develop the property or sell it off to a builder. There are grants that the Immokalee Water and Sewer District can apply for to extend reuse water to the site. Question: What are the demographics this is geared toward. We need houses that pay ad- valorum taxes. Answer: This is market rate housing. Question: Have any studies been required by Collier County. Answer: As part of the zoning, we have been required to submit several studies, an environmental study, transportation, stormwater and an archeological and cultural resources study. Question: What was the outcome of the transportation study? Answer: There is capacity on the road. 2 1 P a g e Question: Is there going to be a second entry way onto Lake Trafford Road. If you go there during school pick up and drop off times, you are stuck. Answer: The traffic study is not going to hit on the back up of school pick up and drop off times. That is not to say there are no problems during school peak hours, but those are common and most any school. As far as roadway access is concerned, we do show a potential access going south to eventually connect to Carson, but permitting a crossing across Camp Kaeis Strand and through the RLSA is very complicated and difficult to do right now. Adjourned at 6:00pm 3 1 P a g e Sign In Sheet Name 1. ('4C1[: �'tili�Gti 2. fi)I np 8L-,/0A �Alk- 3. 4. i J Address Lc /l d Gtdo6 k) we5►� -e- 6. -1 i�1y(+ l V L %. 8. 9. 10. 11 12. Contact Information AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Signature of Applicant) State of Florida County of Palm Beach The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this day of OCR z242$ b � y � l�S t ,who is personally known to me or who has produced IS as identification. C� gnat of Notary Public) Printed N e of Notary GANIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NIM Oct2010.Doc '' �u' •. KAYDE PEACE •': Notary Public - State of Florida Commission # HH 046993 Aires Sep 28 2024 rQt 71119A.tional Notary Assn. Publication Date 8/5/2022 Ad Number GC10923714 Publication Naples Daily News Market Naples Delivery Method Email Number of Affidavits Needed 1 Customer Name DeLisi, Inc. Customer Phone Number (239) 913-7159 Customer Address 520 27Th ST West Palm Beach, FL 33407-5420 Account Number (If Known) AP-516732 Customer Email dan@delisi-inc.com Your Name Marita Froimson Email Address mfroimson@gannett.com IX*alltC541'.�' attli PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 DELISI INC 520 27TH ST WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 8/5/2022 Subscribed and sworn to before on August 5th, 2022 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown My commission expires: / —, PUBLICATION COST: $1,008.00 AD No: GC10923714 CUSTOMER NO: 516732 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD W MAP 3X10 KATHLEE AILEN Notary State of Wlscons'in NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by Daniel DeLisi, of DeLisi, Inc., representing The James E. Williams Jr. Trust for PUDZ-PL20210001434 —Williams Farm Rezoning (RPUD) on: August 30th at 5:30 p.m. at Immokalee Community Park 321 North 1st Street, Immokalee, FL 34120 Subject Property: located south of Lake Trafford Road. z N Project � Location westclox Lake Trafford RD z W Main 57 The property owner is petitioning Collier County to rezone the property from Estates (E) to Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow the development of a neighborhood commercial center. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and Collier County staff. The meeting will also be online via Zoom. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone or e-mail by August 25, 2022, to: Daniel DeLisi, AICP DeLisi, Inc. Phone: (239) 913-7159 dan@delisi-inc.com ND-Guc923714-91 Beach views at Sunset Grille on Marco. PHOTOS BY DIANA BIEDERMANINAPLES DAILY NEWS/USA TODAY NETWORK - FLORIDA Bites Continued from Page 2D I get a little nervous here as my husband's favorite store is adjacent and he likes to shop. This is the brand's NOG restaurant that opened in 1995 and re- mains one of the most popular spots in town, holding a steady ranking on TripAdvisors top 10%, Terrific handhelds, famous coconut shrimp, Cock - twit, musicplus ample seating inside and out Award cau tion:: ution: It can get very loud. (1220 Third St. S. Na- ples; 239-643-6889; tommybohoma,com) Marco Island Dolphin 11ki Bar & Grill: Google piers on Marco Island and Pelican Pier Marina pops up, though it's really just a long dock surrounded by ships and con- dos. If $20 lobster -stuffed tacos we on the specials board, get them, preferably with side of onion strings. Bang Bang shrimp will set your mouth on fire in a good way. Go now, because when the season resumes, you may wait forever for a seat, 0021 Anglers Cove, Marco Island; 239-394-4048* dolphintikibaccom) Stonewalls: This unassuming restaurant across the street from South Beach's public entrance near the Hilton crafts some of Marco's best from -scratch load. Everything ordered consistently exceeds expec- tations. A pesto chicken sandwich special ($14) was ele- gantly presented on two slices of terrific grilled sour- dough. Big enough to share, I ate every bite, (551 S. Col- lier Blvd., Marco Island; 239-389-1995, Stonewall's pesto grilled chicken sandwich ($14). ma rcostmlewalls, earn) Sunset Grille: No need to be a guest at Apollo Con- dominiums to pick up frosty pi na coladas from the bar and head back to your beach chair. Right next to South Beach's palm -lined public entryway with a parallel ramp, you'll pass this sports bar when parking in the public lot on Swallow Avenue, Much of the menu is S20 and under. Need a break from the sun? Cool off on the shaded terrace, where beach views go on forever. (900 S. Collier Blvd., Marco Island; 239-389-0509; sunsetgri Ileanmarmisla nd,com) Diana Biederman is the food and restaurant re- porter at Naples Daily News, Contact her at dia umbederman@naplesnews, corn NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by Daniel DeLisi, of DeLisi, Inc_, representing The James E. Williams Jr. Trust forPUDZ-PL20210001434 — Williams Farm Rezoning (RPUD) on: August 30th at 5:30 p.m, at Immokalee Community Park 321 North 1st Street, Immokalee, FL 34120 Subject Property: located south of Lake Trafford Road. Project rn Location LAkP TrDyoilE RO E) The property owner is petitioning Collier County to rezone the property from Estates (E) to Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow the development of a neighborhood commercial center. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and Collier County staff, The meeting will also be online via "Loom. II' you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone or e-mail by August 25, 2022, to: onx Friday ��:r HgpLrs nlflrl a �NII(Hf=LHOH'S Saturday KS STEAK STEAK DINNERS! CERTIFIED BLACK ANGUS B OZ SIRLOIN b.hl&. L'hdd Id Put.& w Comma Garl.n IS.4.rS,WAG4WG.rb.Twe1 s l5,ss1 NAPLES ONLY-3PM b CLOSE 12 OZ SIRLOIN DINE -IN OR TAKE-OUT S,1E899) NO COUPON NECESSARY I „ M43 YEARS & COUNTING... 1CHEl ROBES [hamplanshlpR BSiSTEAKS FRIED FISH FRIDAY I FRIED FISH] WITH COLE SLAW, FRIES & GARLIC TOAST FISH LUNCH (ltam-3pm).............. $10.99 FISH DINNER(3pF Close).............$14.99 FRIDAY ONLY - NO COUPON NECEE6 RY lives u���� 1� IF�T1' :��;� I$359�c . r2)ppruPxFll • renal vr$ . I NNr YI.Aw • snlwm Hoot man pl No Coupon Necessary. Naples or Marco Island - PELICN MARSH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON AND CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YFAR 2023 PROPOSED FINAL BUDGET; TO CON51DER THE IMPOSITION OF NON -AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS; ADOPTION OF A FINAL NON -AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL, AND THE LEVY, COLLECTION, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE SAME; AND NOTICE OF REGULAR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING. The snug al o IIM 'v..d'l al fhe Plku Marsh community .bruldnp.eM..DlufF21 1[lar'•� ukk,S'] w131 nusldisw mceulyl Ors Friday, Augyst 19, 2022. The lint merBnQ wYl 'SO4 r.ulrn Mmnh alvd, ry tr a,'rd�3M'1 a'tB.900 A, 1. at the Pelitao Manit CATnlunlry CSnRr. THE SECOND MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON FRIDAY, AU: GUST 19. 2G22, IS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON AND CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF THE PIS CAL YEAR 2023 PROPOSED FINAL BUDGET; TO CONSIDER THE IMPOSITION OF NON -AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND ADOPTION OF A FINAL NON -AD VALOREM SPECIAL A55ESSMINE ROLL AND WILL TAKE PLACE ON FRIDAY, AUGUST 19. 2022. AT 9:30 AM, AT THE PELICAN MARSH COMMUNITY CENTER ISD. PELICAN MARSH BLVD. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109. inn Diwirr n Int to hPPr.BM 9-41Y Any t Ina r vblMlum kdn me rrn0.n'af the prewlyt, re pe z.L.lLed ee. "n.he, veoAnLini—."d d-6 , 1o...40 .rid In dnnmLns, Ivry, .ntl•,m�r. I.nmad • 14, li tgtelel n,nTraum vwn I"e IN.AA Inoue wlLnln 11lA D'apiLL 11 o.a1Lr.Phu d.p:atlan u! L"F1Rp apeny rdtye[i to .fsenmenLs h,h0wn 1SJOrYJ ro hsml the DlrLriclt veld �r UI 'e p rdl.cllde�r u.d en wumeni ar 1Fse nw,Y d reln.einRsv i�t uw.uarl Nora --e to P` . The public hearings will be [onduaed pur....1 10 Florida law, induding, but not limited to Chap- 1e 190 and 192, Florida Statute,. AL Iha [orsµ of thr public hearings, the Board Will' bm resolution, adopp, the Fiscal Year 2023 bvayel a, Smolt, apryered by the ear Bd, and levy, anpos d e special ass ,smears as finally ap- "44 by rite ➢ova The prop,ed xl,edu a oI a,s,. detailed m the chart hel— and the special au. —nu far nperalion and mainlenarue are ou 5li-d m gre Ier derail m the budget FISCAL YEAR ASSESSMENT CHART Proposed FY 2023 Maintenance BUd9e1 Adopted 2022 Budget Proposed 2U23 Budget Increase Ira. 2022 vs, 2023 Sla9da90 S4,272450 S37 3560 ERU 2"1 2919 0 A,ses,nen UERUIU,u 11,322 51 449 S127 ERU - ERu,valenl Re„tle anal Units The Fical Year 2023 Opera Uvr,s and Mainterran[e Special Asfesysmenh Iw all land w,Ih,, the T pperelln lepLF�ilule iu lA+y �Is� auerimenu .dl w...,I- ..r, t .rep � IxuN legs Ne at ih.r•P�'bS [ h an�F rrrsJt •r a b,F dF t+Nv- AA aIfrile4 flrgprnk pW'Rpn IMw [h. rignl la app r Di,lrK 1, Mrnrrl .l SLP} Hi.ndrl oM [eSu�vi,221ell. M11D [vIyrine jwoTnATof oft l},e Linn yr IN% r 1N . w' ty na] 4ayr of puglir.• IDe pub0c netlegr and meeeng a e nptn In ter R,•.n IN .nn'wlll he mntluned In Prdance with the provniP. tjs rFor,da law for ComnluIR Dr lopml Ostrich. The pl pllk Fhearings and may ib een;inued to a pale, fidst, rdv pAxe Ir b. spr.lrird on the 1e0W .1 Lhe hearing, or meel,ug There meF'pe o ca,:o. nlHn 3S.H o N.r ViPlYur11 may parti[ipale by speaker lelephrNle•_In. ordvt. SSRlhctne proyil.oYn pf the Ada•aant rNIh 1, likes Act, ny person r , Dw ,pnW [ ip • a1 rhl. m ing ,noultl onto IpNe Dis;rn FAN. age 1 IJ391 59]-9't5 .�leax� ony�e,ghl 1401 noun pr,oreLo 1 r date oI [ne m tinq II^ ou e the rD s9ria OlfPr^ mpa,red, plea,¢ co nlael the Florida Relay Servile al J11 for aetl in <o .ac mg 1a6, plxm whc decide, :e ep>s eat .ny dr4„iorr! n 44r pr the Board WII"any maner ftl a he pubt[ nYPrn�1 0 ..IrellF,n rF Ptlnlrtl lr,.t penon w l rK[q.!¢cord of F,oceed' �9s a,RP ln+l arecrdingly, rnA p..wn m.y nred III .TnWr rhal a -be,- .Nuly of Ine prp o ing„ made, in clud.ng appeal i, to br based w, Neil Dor,di Dhv,c1 %Vana5 pub Oale AuS, 12, 2022 115360460 SELL YOUR CAR FIND A HOME GET A JOB Daniel DeLisi, AICP DeLisi, Inc. Phone: (239) 913-7159 ADOPT A PET BUY A BOAT August 10, 2022 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the following described property: PETITION NO. PUDZ-PL20210001434 — Williams Farm Rezoning (RPUD) — located along the south side of Lake Trafford Road in Immokalee, Florida. The petitioner is asking the County to approve this application to allow development of a residential neighborhood on approximately 168 acres +/-. In compliance with the Land Development Code re uirements a Nei hborhood Information Meetin x w N Q: Project �+ Location westc�ox $� Lake Trafford Rd x W Main 8 i ST q g g will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on August 30", 5:30pm at: Immokalee Community Park 321 North 1 st Street, Immokalee, FL Due to COVID-19, special accommodations will be made to allow people to attend in person or virtually. The meeting will be held indoors at the Immokalee Community Park where CDC guidelines will be observed. Reservations for in -person meeting attendance is required to ensure social distancing can be met. The meeting will also be online via Zoom. Should you choose to either participate in the Zoom meeting or want to attend in -person, please notify us via email at dangdelisi-inc.com 12rior to August 25' to allow us to send you login instructions and document your reservation. At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me. Sincerely, Daniel DeLisi, AICP DeLisi, Inc. Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20210001434 I Buffer: 500' 1 Date: 7/14/2022 1 Site Location: 72520000 and 57320005 NAME1 ABURTO, PORFIRIO & ELITANIA AGUILAR, JUAN CARLOS AGUSTIN, J VALERIANO JUAREZ ARREGUIN, GLORIA PENA ARROWHEAD 229 LLC ARROWHEAD 229 LLC ARROWHEAD RESERVE ARROWHEAD RESERVE ARROWHEAD RESERVE ARROWHEAD RESERVE ARROWHEAD RESERVE ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT AVALOS JR, RAMIRO AVELAR, LETICIA A BALTAZAR, PONCIANO SALDIVAR BAPTISTE, JANFRIS JEAN BARAJAS, ISMAEL BARNHART, DALIA BARRON COLLIER P'SHIP LLLP BENJAMIN, DUBE & MARIE DENISE BERACA BAPTIST CHURCH INC BERACA BAPTIST CHURCH INC BLANC, DORCILIEN BLOCKER,BRENDA BLOCKER, CURTIS & BRENDA BOSS, ELDIKET & MARIATA BRIONES HERNANDEZ, ISRAEL BRIONES, ARTURO CALDERON, PATRICIA CANTU JR, JOSE CANTU JR, ROGELIO CARRANZA, ADRIANA CASAREZ, VIRGINIA S CEAC, JEAN & MARIE R CEARC, ANGELINE CHAPARRO, GUADALUPE T CHAVEZ, IGNACIO S CHERRY SR, ROBERT H & MARY E CHERRY, ROBERT H SR & MARY E CHEVRY, JEAN G CISNEROS, YADIRA CLAUDIA YBARRA TRUST COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC COOK, GLEN E NAME2 4324 LITTLE LEAGUE CT DULCE M VERA VILLAGOMEZ D HORTENCIA PEREZ AGUSTIN PO BOX 646 7742 ALICO RD 7742 ALICO RD AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 4285 LITTLE LEAGUE COURT 1185 ALLEGIANCE WAY 1117 HAMILTON ST EDITHE JEAN BAPTISTE MARIA DEL ROSARIO B GUERRERO PO BOX 14 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY # 200 4273 LITTLE LEAGUE CT PO BOX 922 PO BOX 922 MARIE CELESTIN PO BOX 970 301 N 15TH ST 1189 ALLEGIANCE WAY CECILIA MUNOZ CHAVEZ DOMITILA HERNANDEZ 1088 HAMILTON ST 506 BOUGAINVILLEA RD W MARCHA MARIA CANTU 1116 HAMILTON ST 4806 MIRAHAM DR 1147 ALLEGIANCE WAY LUCCENE GERMINORD 1193 ALLEGIANCE WAY GLADYS L CHAVEZ P O BOX 5303 PO BOX 5303 MARIE J CHEVRY ALCEUS 1196 ALLEGIANCE WAY 4914 MIRAHAM DR TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 1495 SMITH PRESERVE WAY 1495 SMITH PRESERVE WAY 904 TAYLOR TER NAME3 1084 HAMILTON ST 1112 HAMILTON ST % ROETZEL & ANDRESS LPA 2180 IMMOKALEE RD STE 309 7742 ALICO RD 7742 ALICO RD 7742 ALICO RD 7742 ALICO RD 1143 ALLEGIANCE WAY 1180 ALLEGIANCE WAY 1156 ALLEGIANCE WAY 900 MIRAHAM TER 900 MIRAHAM TER 1322 ORANGE ST S 1042 FORD CT 1092 HAMILTON ST 1069 HAMILTON ST 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAME4 2330 FIRST STREET STE 1000 NAME5 NAME6 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2464 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 646 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 33901---0 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2433 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 14 NAPLES, FL 34105---3227 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2496 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2433 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 970 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 3402 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33936--- 6206 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2408 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 5303 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2433 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34104---4902 NAPLES, FL 34104---4961 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2420 POList 500 CRENSHAW, LADONNA J 710 CANAVERAL GROVES BLVD COCOA, FL 32926 --- 0 CRUZ, ALFREDO LEON ANTONIA RIOS HERNANDEZ PO BOX 1380 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 CRUZ, GELACIO & ROSA PO BOX 1467 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 CRUZ, GELACIO H & ROSA PO BOX 1467 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 1467 DAVENPORT, ROBERT E KATHERINE LYNETTE DAVENPORT 9064 THE LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DAVENPORT, ROBERT E KATHERINE LYNETTE DAVENPORT 9064 THE LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DAVENPORT, ROBERT E & LYNETTE 9064 THE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---1554 DEW RELL, TRACEY & MARA 336 S ESPLANADE ALPHARETTA, GA 30009 --- 0 DEW RELL, TRACEY & MARA 336 S ESPLANADE ALPHARETTA, GA 30009 --- 0 DOMINGO, EULALIA HENRY KEITHZ BERNUY VILLANUEVA 1108 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 DOMINGUEZ, LEONEL PADILLA 4802 MIRAHAM DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 DUPREE, RONAND 19435 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ESPINOZA, JAIME & ROSE A PO BOX 2380 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 2380 ESTRADA, EBER H LOPEZ 1104 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 ESTRADA, HERIBERTO ANA ESTRADA 5101 QUAIL ROOST RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 EXANTUS, SMITH ANNE JULIE JULES EXANTUS 1124 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 FRANCISCO, ERMINIO ANDRES 1091 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 FRANCOIS, JESULA PO BOX 501 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 501 FROST INVESTMENT LLC 12151 MUSKET LN FT MYERS, FL 33912---0 GALAN, MARIA A 5104 DEER RUN RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 GAMEZ REVOCABLE TRUST JOEL GAMEZ 9200 BONITA BEACH RD #211 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 GARCIA JR, GUADALUPE 1052 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 GARCIA JR, JUAN D 4305 LAKE TRAFFORD RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2516 GARCIA, BERNABE ANA DOLORES CASTRO VILLEGAS 1044 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 GARCIA, GIL G & VERONICA 840 TAYLOR TER IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2443 GARCIA, RAUL M ANDREA GUTIERREZ 1043 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 GARCIA, ROBERT & CYNTHIA 1204 N 18TH ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 GARZA, ELMA 1151 ALLEGIANCE WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 GARZA, JUAN J & MARIA L PO BOX 5195 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 5195 GARZA, TIM D PO BOX 5195 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 GASPAR, JUANA T 4277 LITTLE LEAGUE CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2496 GOMEZ, PABLO MARIA GOMEZ CISNEROS 1118 JACKSON CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 GONZALES, JOHNNIE MICHEL HINOJOSA FELIZ 1064 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 GONZALEZ-VERA, ALVARO MARIA R ARRIAGE GONZALES 1172 ALLEGIANCE WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2433 GREEN, ALLEN PARNELL GLADYS E GREEN 1035 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 GUTIERREZ, JUAN A 1007 RAULERSON RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2507 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113---7753 HERARD, LACARIERE YVETTE FLEURISMA 1120 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 HERNANDEZ, ADAN MARIA GUADALUPE CHAVEZ PO BOX 2435 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 2435 HERNANDEZ, ANTONIO 1036 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALLE, FL 34142---0 HERNANDEZ, OLGA NEVAREZ PO BOX 700 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 700 HERNANDEZ, SERAFIN KEIRA FABIOLA HERNANDEZ 1113 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 HERNANDEZ, URBANO MANUEL HERNANDEZ 1203 MIMOSA AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2827 HERNANDEZ, URBANO & ELVIRA 1203 MIMOSA AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2827 HERRERA, JOSEPH N & MARIA M PO BOX 805 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 805 HINOJOSA, JOSE A OLIVIA A HINOJOSA 6103 TAYLOR RD S IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 HUAPILLA MENDIZA, A GETZEL ISIDRO FRANCO CARRENO 1311 LINCOLN CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 HUAPILLA, ISMAEL JUANA ALVARADO 1508 7TH AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 INDEPENDENCE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 W STATE RD 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779 --- 0 INDEPENDENCE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 W STATE RD 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779 --- 0 INDEPENDENCE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 W STATE RD 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779 --- 0 JAIMES JR, ERNESTO 1039 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 JAMES E WILLIAMS JR TRUST 1300 N 15TH ST STE 1 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2811 JAMES E WILLIAMS JR TRUST 1300 N 15TH ST STE 1 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2811 JAMES E WILLIAMS JR TRUST 1300 N 15TH ST STE 1 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2811 JAMES E WILLIAMS JR TRUST 1300 N 15TH ST STE 1 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2811 JEAN-MARIE, JOSEPH & IMMACULA 1139 ALLEGIANCE WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 POList 500 JOSE, ENRIQUETA PO BOX 40 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 40 LAKE TRAFFORD 26 TRUST 13051 BALD CYPRESS DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 LEDESMA, JUANA 4272 LITTLE LEAGUE CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2497 LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC COOP INC 4980 BAYLINE DR FORT MYERS, FL 33917--- 3910 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DR SUITE 430 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 --- 0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 POList 500 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LGI HOMES FLORIDA LLC 1450 LAKE ROBBINS DRIVE STE 430 WOODLANDS, TX 77380---0 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779 --- 0 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779 --- 0 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779 --- 0 LOZANO, SILVIA SABANILLA 1080 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 LUCID, REUBEN A GABRIELA R RUIZ 1046 FORD COURT IMMOKALEE, FL 33912 --- 0 MALDONADO, JUAN & ROSA 1013 DANFORTH ST LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33974--- 9512 MANZANO ET AL, ARTURO S 203 S 7TH ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MARTINEZ JR, ANTONIO PO BOX 3062 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 3062 MARTINEZ, A FERNANDO JIMENEZ MARIANA JARQUIN ALTAMIRANO 1115 JACKSON CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MARTINEZ, ANGEL ZETINA 1101 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MARTINEZ, HERNAN 402 TAYLOR TERRACE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MARTINEZ, JOSE L MARIA DE JESUS MARTINEZ 4709 MIRAHAM DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MARTINEZ, JOSE MANUEL TREJO 1096 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MARTINEZ, MINDY PO BOX 486 FELDA, FL 33930 --- 0 MARTINEZ, PEDRO 830 MIRAHAM PL IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2448 MARTINEZ, SAUL MARINA MARTINEZ PO BOX 5008 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 MATOS, CARLOS 7167 NW 7TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33150 --- 0 MENDES, RODENS MARIE A CEARC 1077 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MENDOZA, ARTURO & MARIA PO BOX 807 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 807 MOMINEE, KATHERINE ELENA 1056 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MONTEZ, ILLIANA MARITZA 1055 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MORALES, ELBA SERRANO 5106 DEER RUN LN IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 MORGAN-CROSSNO, ANN 5101 TAYLOR RD N IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2362 MUSCATIELLLO, DOROTHY 1005 RAULERSON RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2507 NAVARRO, MA DEL ROSARIO VICTORIA SALAS 4710 MIRAHAM DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 NICHOLS TR, KATHRYN M NORMAN J SILBERLING TR KATHRYN M NICHOLS TRUST NORMAN JOHN SILBERLING TRUST 1235 ESTES ST LAKEWOOD, CO 80215--- 4226 NICHOLS TR, KATHRYN M NORMAN J SILBERLING TR KATHRYN N NICHOLS TRUST NORMAN J SILBERLING TRUST 1235 ESTES ST LAKEWOOD, CO 80215--- 4226 NIETO, DINA 4320 LITTLE LEAGUE CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2464 OCANAS, JUAN LUIS & ANA 4801 MIRAHAM DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2407 OLVERA, JOSE DAVID 1109 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 PEREZ, JAVIER PEREZ 811 JEFFERSON AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 PIERRE, MISELINE LOUIS JEAN OLOVINSKY 1068 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 POList 500 PONCE, MIGUEL & MARIA LUZ 1100 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 POWELL, DELICIA V 1176 ALLEGIANCE WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2433 PREVILON, JEAN VOLTAIRE JUNIOR GARDINE SIMEUS PREVILON 1065 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 PUENTE JR, PEDRO & SANDRA PO BOX 1032 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 1032 QUINTANILLA, ADAM & ANITA 1601 PROVERBS LN IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2086 R & B TRAILER PARK INC % HOWARD BEACH 136 HUDSON ST INGLIS, FL 34449 --- 0 RANGEL, BLAZ 1001 RAULERSON RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2507 RAULERSON FAMILY LIV TRUST PO BOX 893 ALVA, FL 33920---0 RAULERSON FAMILY LIV TRUST PO BOX 893 ALVA, FL 33920---0 RAULERSON FAMILY LIV TRUST PO BOX 893 ALVA, FL 33920---0 REYES, VALERIE KEVIN RENARD HANDY JR 1060 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 RIVIERA, ALBERTO ANA M RIVERA 4289 LITTLE LEAGUE CT PO BOX 3512 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 3512 RODRIGUEZ, GLORIA 5011 MIRAHAM DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2405 RODRIGUEZ, RAFAEL & MARTHA 835 MIRAHAM PL IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2455 RODRIGUEZ, SAUL ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ PO BOX 703 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 ROMAN, CONRADO MURILLO 1045 FORD CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 ROSALES, JEANNE PO BOX 748 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 SALAS JR, BERNARDINO 4905 MIRAHAM DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 SALAS, BERNARDINO & MARTA 4905 MIRAHAM DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2445 SALINAS, LEOPOLDO 612 TAYLOR TER IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2425 SANCHEZ, JOSE A PO BOX 1104 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143--- 1104 SEARC, NULIE 1072 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 SESSIONS, KATHERINE J PO BOX 433 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 433 SILVA III, JUAN 1073 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 SOLIZ, BLANCA R 5102 DEER RUN RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2318 SUAZO, MARTHA I GODOY 1097 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 TICE TRADING POST INC TR DEER RUN LAND TRUST #5105 PO BOX 50488 FORT MYERS, FL 33994 --- 488 TREJO, HECTOR FLORA GARCIA GONZALEZ 1050 FORD CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 VALDEZ, ERICA CISNEROS 1164 ALLEGIANCE WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2433 VALENTIN, JOSE LUIS & MARIA R 4269 LITTLE LEAGUE CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2496 VALTIERRA, ALBERTO SANCHEZ SONIA YANIRA SANCHEZ 1048 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 VELASQUEZ, LUIS I ESMERALDA DIAZ GUADARRAMA 1192 ALLEGIANCE WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2433 VELAZQUEZ, ELIZABETH 1111 JACKSON CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 VILLA, MOISES ALFONSO VILLA 1003 RAULERSON RD IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 VILLAGOMEZ, ISRAEL CUEVAS 1119 JACKSON CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 VILLAGOMEZ, MIGUEL A 1041 FORD CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 WERNETTE, JOHN D & BEVERLY F 6579 RIDGEWOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34108---8263 WESTCLOX MANAGEMENT LLC 19301 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 YZAGUIRRE III, RAYNALDO 1304 LINCOLN CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 YZAGUIRRE III, RAYNALDO 351 ETHEL FRANK COURT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 YZAGUIRRRE III, RAYNALDO 351 ETHEL FRANK COURT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 ZARAGOZA, GERARDO ESPINOZA 4316 LITTLE LEAGUE CT IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2464 ZARATE, MARIO & BETSY 914 MIRAHAM TER IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2484 ZEPEDA, ALBERT DAMIAN MARISOL ZEPEDA JUAN MANUEL VERA 1081 HAMILTON ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0 ZEPEDA, ANITA 1181 ALLEGIANCE WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2483 POList 500 2726 OAK RIDGE COURT, SUITE 503 TRANSPORTATION FORT MYERS, FL 3.278.3356 OFFICE 239.278.1906 7A Tr% CONSULTANTS, I N C FAX 239.278.1906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR WILLIAMS FARM PUD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (MAJOR STUDY REVIEW - $19500) (METHODOLOGY REVIEW FEE - $500) PROJECT NO. F2108.29 PREPARED BY: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Certificate of Authorization Number: 27003 2726 Oak Ridge Court, Suite 503 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-9356 (239) 278-3090 Revised: March 31, 2022 7A TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC CONTENTS INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IV. TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION V. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY VI. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS VII. CONCLUSION TRANSPORTATION 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC I. INTRODUCTION TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the rezoning application for the proposed residential development to be located at the southeast corner of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road in the Immokalee area of Collier County, Florida. This report has been completed in compliance with the guidelines established by the Collier County Transportation Planning Division for developments seeking rezoning approval. The approximate location of the subject site is illustrated on Figure 1. The applicant is seeking to rezone the approximate 168 acre subject site to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit a development of up to 336 single-family dwelling units at a density of two units per acre (2 DU/acre). Access to the site is currently proposed to Lake Trafford Road via a single connection. Methodology meeting was held with Collier County Staff on September 30, 2021 in order to discuss the proposed rezoning traffic study. The meeting checklist and the latest methodology notes are attached at the end of this document for reference. This report examines the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways. Trip generation and assignments to the site access driveways will be completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the surrounding intersections. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is currently vacant. The subject site is bordered by Arrowhead Preserve residential community to the east, vacant land to the south, residential uses to the west, and by an electric substation, residential uses and Lake Trafford Road to the north. Page 2 7A TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC Lake Trafford Road is a two-lane undivided collector that borders the site to the north. The Level of Service Standard on Lake Trafford Road between Carson Road and SR 29 (Roadway Link ID #47.0) is LOS "D", or 800 vehicles in the peak hour, peak direction. Lake Trafford Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and is under the jurisdiction of Collier County Department of Transportation. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The applicant is seeking to rezone the approximate 168 acre subject site to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit a development of up to 336 single-family dwelling units at a density of two units per acre (2 DU/acre). Table 1 summarizes the proposed land use utilized for trip generation purposes for the subject site. Table 1 Land Use Williams Farm PUD Land Use Size Single -Family Detached Housing 336 Units (LUC 210) Access to the site is currently proposed to Lake Trafford Road via a single connection. IV. TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION The trip generation for the proposed development was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation Manual, 1 Itn Edition. Land Use Code 210 (Single -Family Detached Housing) was utilized for the trip generation purposes of the proposed development. The equations used from this land use are contained in the Appendix of this report for reference. Table 2 outlines the anticipated weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour and daily trip generation based on the proposed rezoning request. Page 4 TRANSPORTATION 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC Table 2 Trip Generation Williams Farm PUD Land Use WeekdayA.M. Peak Hour WeekdayP.M. Peak Hour Daily (2-way) In Out Total In Out Total Single -Family Detached Housing 58 166 224 195 115 310 3,077 336 Units) The trips the proposed development is anticipated to generate were assigned to the site access drives and the surrounding roadway network. The project traffic distribution was determined in the methodology with staff and is illustrated on Figure 2. Figure 2 also illustrates the assignment of the total project trips to the site access drive on Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road intersection with Lake Trafford Road based upon the project traffic distribution as shown in the attached methodology meeting notes. V. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table 1A, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. The trips generated as a result of the proposed rezoning on the subject site as shown in Table 2 were compared with the Capacity for Peak Hour — Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the 2021 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). Based on the information contained within Table IA, Lake Trafford Road, SR 29 and Carson Road are all shown to be significantly impacted based on 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. No other roadways were shown a significant impact as a result of the development traffic being added to the roadway network. Page 5 WESTCLOX ST 3 (10) (10) 3� 58 (195) f* (12) 17 co (80) 116 (23) 33 r SITE Fl 11 0 O r N ♦40 (136) ti .I N rn co r on i 1 r N co co ♦ 5% ♦ 4� • (6) 9� ti N r 0) N U) * 5% CAPTURE 1 0 Lo r �i N 5% � LAKE TRAFFORD RD CAPTURE ♦ 9 ♦ 70%♦ (17) 25 } (17) 25♦ N (40) 58 1 Lo CM fl M Lo IMMOKALEE DR ► j ♦ 12 (39) �20%♦ (23) 33♦ o M 00 � iv CO N N r r I� r lam' '+K ROBERTS AVE i 6 {20) CO') T r LEGEND ■- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR SITE TRAFFIC a (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SITE TRAFFIC ♦20%-► PERCENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION N W E S N.T.S. `Y -4-15% ♦ 20% t 10%-0- TRANSPORTATION TRIP DISTRIBUTION & // TRCONSULTANTS, INC SITE TR,gFFIc ��RqNIVIENT WLIS PUD Figure 2 TRANSPORTATION 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table 2A includes the concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The current remaining capacity and Level of Service Standard for each roadway segment analyzed was obtained from the 2021 Collier County Annual Inventory Update Report (AUIR). A five-year planning analysis was also conducted. In order to estimate the projected 2026 background traffic volumes, the existing 2021 peak hour peak direction traffic volumes from the 2021 AUIR were adjusted by the appropriate growth rate. The growth rate calculations are shown in Table 3A of the Appendix. These projected volumes were then compared with the 2021 existing plus trip bank volumes from the 2021 AUIR. The more conservative of the two volumes was then utilized as the 2026 background traffic volume. The concurrency analysis was then performed by subtracting the project traffic volumes that will result with the proposed development from the 2026 background remaining capacity in order to determine whether or not sufficient capacity will be available after the addition of the net new traffic associated with the proposed approval. Based on the information contained within Table 2A, there will be sufficient capacity on all analyzed roadways to support the proposed development. Figure 3 was created to indicate the results of the concurrency analysis on the adjacent roadway network. As can be seen within Figure 3, the proposed development does not cause any roadways links to operate below capacity. Turn lane improvements at the proposed site access drive will be evaluated at the project seeks site development plan approval application. Page 7 97 N (88) [68] 3.25% W E WESTCLOX ST S N.T.S. 97 (88) rn /� [68] py N N 3.25% co 207 U) (41) [92] 24.38% LAKE TRAFFORD RD 213 f 97 (201) 207 (39) SITE z �� [174] (91) [57] O) 6.5% [127] 7.58% Q 17.06% U II IMMOKALEE DR 97 (39) [57] 7.58% ROBERTS AVE N 97 � (56) [68] 5.42% LEGEND 000 2026 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY (000) 2026 REMAINING CAPACITY W/ AM PROJECT TRAFFIC [000] 2026 REMAINING CAPACITY W/ PM PROJECT TRAFFIC 0.0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE TRANSPORTATION 2026 REMAINING CAPACITY ON 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED LINKS WILLIAMS FARM PUD Figure 3 TRANSPORTATION 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC VI. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Intersection analysis was conducted utilizing the latest version of the SYIVCHRO° to determine the operational characteristics of the signalized intersection of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road. Peak hour turning movement counts were conducted by TR Transportation at this intersection on October 20, 2021. The peak hour turning movements were then adjusted for peak season conditions based on peak season factor data as provided by FDOT in their Traffic Information Online resource. The FDOT peak season correction factor is included in the Appendix of this report for reference. The existing peak season traffic volumes were then increased by a growth rate factor to determine the projected 2026 background turning movement volumes. Table 3A of the Appendix illustrates the methodology utilized to formulate the appropriate annual growth rate for each roadway segment. The turning volumes projected to be added to the intersection as illustrated on Figure 2 were then added to the 2026 background volumes to estimate the future 2026 traffic volumes with the project. These volumes are based on the data from the spreadsheet contained in the Appendix of this report titled Development of Future Year Background Turning Volumes. The SYNCHRO° summary sheets, attached to this report for reference, indicate the intersection will operate at acceptable Level of Service "E" or better in 2026 both with and without the project trips in the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Therefore, no intersection improvements will be warranted based on the intersection analysis conducted as part of this report. The signal timings used in the intersection analysis were provided by the Collier County Department of Transportation and are included in the Appendix of this report for reference. Page 9 TRANSPORTATION 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC VII. CONCLUSION The proposed rezoning of the subject site to a Planned Unit Development (CPUD) is to allow a development of up to 336 single-family dwelling units. The site, located at the southeast corner of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road, meets Collier County Consistency and Concurrency requirements. The surrounding roadway network was analyzed based on the 2021 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR) and future 2026 build -out traffic conditions. As a result, sufficient capacity is indicated along all surrounding roadways in 2026 both with and without the proposed development. Intersection analysis was conducted at the intersection Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road. The results of this analysis indicate that the intersection will operate at acceptable Level of Service "E" or better in 2026 both with and without the project trips in the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Therefore, no intersection improvements will be warranted based on the intersection analysis conducted as part of this report. KA2021\08 August\29 Williams Ranch hnmokalee\SutTciency\3-31-2022.Report. doe Page 10 APPENDIX METHODOLOGY MEETING NOTES APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Location: via e-mail People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Yury Bykau. TR Transportation Consultants, Inc., (239) 278-3090 2) Ted Treesh, TR Transportation Consultants, Inc., (239) 278-3090 3) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Transportation, (239) 252-2926 Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: Yury Bykau, Transportation Consultant Organization: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: (239) 278-3090 2726 Oak Ridge CourtSuite 503 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Reviewers) Reviewer's Name & Title: M_ichaeI Sawyer, Transportation Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization & Telephone Number: (239)_252-2613 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Williams Farm PUD Location: Southeast Corner of Lake Trafford Rd/Little League Rd Immokalee Land Use Type: Single -Family Residential ITE Code #: LUC 210 (Single -Family Detached Housing) Proposed number of development units: 336 Dwelling Units Other: N/A Description: Single -Family Residential Zoning: Existing: Vacant Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Requested: K:12021108 Augustl29 Williams Ranch ImmokaleelMethodologylRevisedlMethodology Meeting Notes 10-25-2021.doc Findings of the Preliminary Study: Project is anticipated to generate approximately 224 AM peak hour trips and 310 PM peak hour trips. See the attached trip generation. Study Type: Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: All roads to be significantly impacted by 2/2/3 impact criteria. Additional intersections to be analyzed: Lake Trafford Rd/Carson Rd Horizon Year(s): 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): AM & PM peak hours Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation 11'' Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): None Transmit use: n/a Other: n/a Horizon Year Roadway Neuoi-k Improveinents: None Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: 2021 AUIR Site -trip generation: See attached Table 2 for the trip generation for the proposed development. Trip distribution method: See attached trip distribution map. Traffic assignment method: By Hand Traffic growth rate: From comparison of the 2011 & 2021 AUIR's Special Features: ffrorn preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: One connection to Lake Trafford Road. Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: K:12021108 Augush2g Williams Ranch ImmokaleelMethodologylRevisedlMethodology Meeting Notes 10-25-2021.doc On -site parking needs: Data Sources: ITE Trip Generation Report, 111h Edition Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: SIGNATURES �o�p. Study Preparer Reviewers Applicant K:120210 Augush29 Williams Ranch ImmokaleelMethodologylRevisedlMethodology Meeting Notes 10-25-2021.doc WILLIAMS FARM PUD TRIP GENERATION ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, LOTH EDITION 336 DWELLING UNITS Table 1 Land Use Williams Farm PUD Land Use Size Single -Family Detached Housing 336 Units (LUC 210) Table 2 Trip Generation Williams Farm PUD Land Use Weekda A.M. Peak Hour Weekda P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2-way) In Out Total In Out I Total Single -Family Detached Housing 58 166 224 195 115 310 3,077 (336 Units) *LUC 210 (Single -Family Detached Housing) was utilized for the trip generation purposes of the proposed residential development. ;TRIP DISTRIBUTION t5(* ` _ t -- Ili � � ";�+I'�Ilf!4i••� Ali Ih. i I ,i.,, . — j � :I�•�; � � +•..I• }'1 ` !i it r rIr11 rl1l 4 - f ..{11 W. �a �(`y - ".:�i�ilr es ,peace,-v WJestclox st - - _ _ ._ T- Q� h•, Or i .Eden-ire=� t4--- Cl) ZT _': i I ° `�� . } rT Curry-Rc€ Plu _ r. �._ , �[1 CD CD W FIR CD L —L-ake ,T-rafford-Rd- : - f.L LL ii� - - '•� ;_ ��-- PIP CD cn , , S� . i - t O _ ' r ` - 03 cn '�-� �il7 _ /, _ ,{ Stlh Ave-N Sth-Ave f ; - to •,�Y= =. - _ ,. ��� � _ Q�r? ell: �•�i �' � -rigid f� , - �,�� _ _ _ � °�r� '•:-� � � _ r_ � z ,� �,,� � i � ; _ ��� ' •1 .�• `� �f �'��. Trail'—� = _ ''� �I�_r •i � - - � — '� L. � • �f� �`r f 6th �CZT"�'°�" z CI7i• + -f .3_ Z I:�'`�-{' % y i j �r�.Yf �' mA1 c)) �L - 3rd Ave �z--, 00 I f ' An _ ��. _ 3 E Mafn S - I i � f• � r � r ^r �. R �� PeL - -- cn i�ria ^' Aes Google Earth �,-� .�•-.��-� ' � s_ - y-- :. TS Ci) Cn- , © 2021 Goo le 1 mi cr "' `-`T�`''�~ 9 J� -ot TABLES 1A, 2A & 3A TABLE 1A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT CALCULATIONS WILLIAMS FARM PUD TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 224 VPH IN= 58 OUT= 166 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 310 VPH IN= 195 OUT= 115 SEGMENT PERCENT PROJECT INBOUND AM PROJECT TRAFFIC PM PROJECT TRAFFIC NUMBER SEGMENT ROADWAY TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION TRAFFIC NORTHIEAST SOUTHIWEST NORTHIEAST SOUTHfWEST SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY SEGMENT PER 2-2-3 ID # CLASS LOS STD INBOUND OUTBOUND DIRECTION VOLUME % LOS STD VOLUME % LOS STD VOLUME % LOS STD VOLUME % LOS STD IMPACT? Lake Trafford Rd E. of Site 2 47.0 2LU 800 100% 100% WEST 166 20.75% 58 715DA 115 14.38% 195 24.38% YES E. of Carson Rd 2 47.0 2LU 800 70% 70% WEST 116 14.53% 1 41 1 5,08% 81 1 1DAB% 137 17.06% YES Carson Rd S. of Lake Trafford Rd 2 9.0 2LU 600 20% 20% NORTH 12 1.93% 33 5.5395 39 8.50% 23 3.83% YES SR 29 N. of Experimental Rd 3 86.0 2LU 900 10% 10% SOUTH 17 1.84% 6 0.- -- 12 1.28% 20 2.17% NO N. of CR 29A North 3 86.0 2LU 900 15% 15% SOUTH 25 2.77% 9 0.97% 17 1.92% 29 3.25% YES N. of Lake Trafford Rd 3 85.0 2LU 900 15% 15% SOUTH 25 2.77% 9 0.97% 17 1.92% 29 3.25% YES S. of Lake Trafford Rd 3 850 2LU 900 35% 35% NORTH 20 2.26% 58 6.48{% 68 7 58 U 40 4.47% YES S. of Immokalee Or 3 85.0 2LU 900 35% 35% NORTH 20 2.26% 58 6.45°;: 68 7 56 % 40 4.47% YES S. of Roberts Ave 3 85.0 2LU 900 25% 25% NORTH 15 1.61 % 42 4 6 49 5.42°I 29 9 19 % YES E of 9th St 3 84.0 4LD 1,700 20% 20% WEST 33 1.95% 12 0.68% 23 1.35% 39 2 29% NO Westclox Rd E. of Carson Rd 3 116.0 2LU 800 5% 5% WEST 8 1.04% 3 0.36% 6 0.72% 10 1.22% NO - DENOTES SIGNIFICANT PERCENT IMPACT OF PROJECT TRAFFIC TO LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD " Link #47.0 was utilized for Lake Trafford Rd segment west of Carson Rd. TABLE 2A CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS WILLIAMS FARM PUD TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC = 224 VPH IN= 58 OUT= 166 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC = 310 VPH IN= 195 OUT= 115 AUIR AUIR AUIR 2026 2026 CAPACITY - WILL THERE BE PROJ TRIPS IN 2021 2021 2021 CURRENT ANNUAL FUTURE PROJECTED AFTER SUFFICIENT SEGMENT AUIR ROADWAY PK DIR OF ROADWAY TRAFFIC TRIP TOTAL REMAINING GROWTH BCKGRND REMAINING PROJECT CAPACITY ROADWAY SEGMENT ID # LOS STD PK DIR AM PM VOLUME BANK VOLUME CAPACITY RATE' TRAFFIC CAPACITY AM PM AVAILABLE? Lake Trafford Rd E. of Site 470 800 EAST 166 115 480 113 593 207 2 00% 593 207 41 92 YES E. of Carson Rd 470 800 EAST 116 81 480 113 593 207 2.00% 593 207 91 127 YES Carson Rd S of Lake Trafford Rd 90 600 NORTH 12 39 340 6 346 254 2 64% 387 213 201 174 YES SR 29 N of CR 29A North 860 900 SOUTH 9 29 700 68 768 132 2 78% 803 97 88 68 YES N. of Lake Trafford Rd 85.0 900 SOUTH 9 29 700 92 792 108 2.78% 803 97 88 68 YES S of Lake Trafford Rd 850 900 SOUTH 58 40 700 92 792 108 2 78% 803 97 39 57 YES S. of Immokalee Dr 850 900 SOUTH 58 40 700 92 792 108 2 78% 803 97 39 57 YES S of Roberts Ave 85.0 900 SOUTH 42 29 700 92 792 108 2 78% 803 97 56 68 YES For roadways with negative or low growth rates, a minimum annual growth rate of 2 0% was assumed. TABLE M ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS BASED UPON HISTORICAL AUIR DATA 2011 2021 ANNUAL ACTUAL CURRENT AUIR AUIR YRS OF GROWTH GROWTH ROADWAY SEGMENT ID# VOLUME VOLUME GROWTH RATE RATE Lake Trafford Rd Carson Rd to SR 29 47.0 396 480 10 2 00% 1.94% Carson Rd Lake Trafford Rd to Immokalee Dr 9.0 262 340 10 2.64% 2.64% SR 29 CR 29A North to SR 82 86.0 532 700 10 2.78% 2.78% 9th ST to CR 29A North 85.0 532 700 10 2.78% 2.78% CR 29A South to 9th ST 84.0 622 610 10 2.00% -0.19% All traffic volumes were obtained from the 2011 & 2021 Annual Update Inventory Reports (AUIR) • In instances where the historical data indicates a reduction in traffic or insufficient data was available to calculate • a growth rate due to construction, a minimum annual growth rate of 2 0% was assumed SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2021 AUIR "(1/Yrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) = -1 — "(1/10) AGR (Lake Trafford Rd) _ -1 396 AGR (Lake Trafford Rd) = 1.94% AUIR REPORT TcM,\ ur .Attachment "F" Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Bascd on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and I t affic Counts Peak 2II21 2020 Net Percent 2021 2021 Traffic Hour, Peak Peak Change Change 2021 2021 Courts+ 2021 a/fil Counts Trip Bank Peak Die Hour Hour In Volume In Voluene 2021 1/7"' Total Counts+ I iip Bank Counts+ L Year Veal. Exist Col. M1lin Peak Service Peak Die Peak Die Front From Trip Trip Trip T, in Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected Road Sea. Aid • Dlr Volume, Volume Volume 20311 3020 Bank Bank Bank Veil- Cuuadry V!C .c 11"11­iP n.en-i r I II NW -I EMli CH31 AMMIL Road IuunokaI ,Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 4D 554 11 N 1200 Li40 1690 -Liu -•, 74';;, 39 0 31 1571 621 71 X'): 21 NV4'=rb'MA CR31 Airport Roud Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drixc (D i99 12 N 3.U0(I 2.100 2330 -2311 -I0161, 43 0 43 '143 857 714"1, 3- NRV-TC`-li1,L CR31 Airport Ruud Orange Blossom Drixc Pmc Ridge Road GD 5113 E ti 3,UIIl1 2,IIG11 2'_3u -17l1 -y 2S^„ Z U 75 2135 %fu 71 '_':6 3II CR31 AHWILRoad Pwc Ridge Road Golden Gale Parkoav 6D 5112 E N 3.11110 2.111111 213n 130 -it 511 14 0 14 2U14 ')Ni. G7I", ., 411 CK31 .l it poet Road Golden Gam Pal ke u2 Radio Road 6D 533 E. N 2_800 _2Ill _00 111 05'!;, 3 0 3 2113 W 7'1-Il", 50 CR31 Airport Road Radio Road Dax is Boulclard 6D -_ E _ N '_-%IIII 2.130 2170 411 -1W'', 11 (l U 2130 670 76X'. GII 'fCEA CR31 Airport Road Da-Boulclard US 41 ITamiami Trail) GD _ 552 r 5 2,700 I,i60 1(50 -,)It"7 102 2 104 1664 1036I bl tr'L 711 IC'EA(pL) Bax,iorc Dmc US 41(Tamiam, Ti ail) Thomason Dm'e 4D i11 1]' S ['800 490 660 -17" _;41,'r•„ 106 _ 111% 598 R0, 33 X.0 CRXG5 Bonita Beach Road ' Wcst of Vanderbilt Drivc Hickop Boulclard 4D 653 D H L900 1070 1080 -10 -117.i",• II 0 0 1070 830 563".i, 'ill _Cuu Road Lake Tiallurd Ruud Immokalcc Dine 2U hl(1 0• N 600 340 190 5[r 14.71% 6 0 6 346 2i4 i77".. If ll Co..,[, Bar,, Road Davis Boulclard Rattlesnake llwnnlock Road '_U 511) D ,S 900 330 480 -1511 =6•6",• 111 1 112 441 454 491''L I II CR29 CR'9 US 41 (Tantiami Trail) Excrglades Cut 2U 3X2A D S [jet)() 140 160 ?0 -14 "'"'„ 111 II III II) Nil) I i 111'6 IIII TCEA SR84 Dal is Boulez and .US 41(Taniiwni Ti ail) Airport Road 6D iiii F• E 2700 1,410 1440 -30 -'IS".. 46 11 46 1456 1244 539"k 1311 SR84 Dal is Buulexwd Aiij-1 Road Lokcooud Boulevard 4D D. E 2,000 1460 1440 2u IJ7";, _ (1 2 14G1 538 73.1"6 140 EC-TC'N1A SR84 Dal is Boulclard Lknxood Boulmard Coor13 Barn Road 4D _i59 659 1D E L000 1590 Iill) XII 5.06"I, 61 0 61 1641 3517 921";, Ii II EC=rC\1A SR84 D.-Baulcxa,d Counl�Bain Road Santa Barbara Boulclard 4D 53X 1) E 2;00 1.3611 W0 -611 -441':;, 150 0 till I5111 69111 68 C'6 16.1 EG-rC\1A SRN4 Dux is Boulct aid Santa Bar berm Bouevard Radio Road 6D 560 E k 3-300 770 811) -4t1 -� IV1. 1'9 139 IiN 918 2372 281"., 162 EurcMA SR84 Davis Boulclard Radio Road Col Tier Boulcvaid CD 60I E H' 3,31111 1,430 1290 140 9-79% Ill 214 3'_6 1746 1544 532''6 170 CR976 Golden Gate Boulevard Collici Boulevard 1Vikme Boulex;aid 4D 531 D E 2.3011 I.99O 1910 X1l 4-02''b 15 0 15 105 295� 872% 18 0 CH 8X6 Goldcn Gale Pwkeay US 41 (Tamwmr Trail) Goodleuc-Frank Road 6D _ 530 E E 2.700 1-640 1560 80 4.88% 13 U 13 I653 1047 (,1 I9 (l CR%NG Goldcn Gam Pw'kxx u) Guudlcue-Flunk Road .Airport Road 6D 307 r E 3,550 2.720 1990 -271) -1) I Il 1 2721 819 i 76 C.'6 20 1 CR896 Golden Gate Park%%a)' Airport Road Lix ingsLon Road 6D 5118 E E 3-551) 3,030 2950 XI) 2.64".;, 17 0 17 3047 503 I XS X44, 202 EC-ICNIA CRNNG Golden Gwc PaiAxay Lking_ston Road 1-73 6D 691 F E. 3551) 3211) 3350 -I40 -•1 !;: �� 0 II 0 "IIII 340 904'!i. '_III EC-fCNIA _ CKNNG Gold cn Gate Parkxray 1-75 1 Saran Barbera Boulcvaid 6D 5119 E h 3.300 1.920 2240 -321) -Ir-67". 14 0 14 1934 I366I 596"'i. 2211 El' -ICNIA CRXX6 Gulden Gate Pw&%%Lx Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulclard 4D 605 1) E 1.980 I,6'90 1730 -41) -_ 7„ 52 8 NO 17i0 230 %N4'.'L 23 O N11'-T CNL1 CRN51 Goudletw-Frank Road _Santa Immokalcc Road 'Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 594 D N I,I➢lU MUTT 7111 -I ll -13 75". 0 11 II XIIII '_UO %II 0''6 241 N11=1 Cl\IA CR951 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drixe 4D i95 E Y 2.400 1:90 1490 -2011 - I, �,C6 73 0 73 1363 1037 56.8"i. 14.1 NW- fCNIA CR8 GoodlcIW-Fronk Road 'O,ungc Blossom D,iw ,Pine Ridge Road 6D 581 E N 2.400 1-49U I650 -I61) -19 71"•, X II X 1499 901 Q-T!'L 2i.0 CR851 Guudlcuc-Runk Road fine Ridge Road Golden Gate Park%%a) 6D 505 F 1 N 3,000 1.760 1')70 -210 -1 1 '13"„ 16 0 16 1776 1224 59 ";, 26.11 C'R851 Goodleuc-Frwlk Road Golden Gate Par kw ay US 41(Toniami Trail) 6D 304 E S 2,700 2,510 '_(XII -176 -, ;,,• 0 (1 (1 2510 1911 93111t6 17O EC-'IC'N1A Green Boulclard Santa Barbara Boulclard Collier Boulcwrd 2U 642 D 4 900 701) 750 -ill -7N':11 III 0 Ill 710 1911 7891i, 29.0 NW-fCNIA Gullshorc Orive IIldiAwnuc Vundcrbill. Beach Road 583u 1) N NIIU 21_II 3111 -90 -iu91"„ II 11 0 220 is() 30.1 CR95I !C'ullicr Buulc-ld Immokalce Road _ Beach Road _'_U 6D_ 6i5 E N 3,000 1,83(1 1981) -it) -27,". 579 36 61i '_44i -- Xli^;, 30.2 CR951 Co[lici Boulevard �Vanderblt Beach Road _Vanderbilt Golden Gate Boulevard 6D 584 E S 3,000 11"Al 1360 40 2 96%. 71) 28 9X 1498 '1,02 49 996 31.1 CIZ951 Collier Boulcvird Golden Gate Boulclard Pmc Ridge Road 6D 536 E N 1A00 1.340 1990 351) 1496";) 95 29 124 2464 536 82-P, 31.2 EC=ICNIA CR951 'Collier Bouloxa,d 'Pine Ridge Road Gmrn Boulcx and 6D 536 L• N 311011 2.3411 19711 311l 1491i 16 129 '2 Lit 2491 i117 831I''6 3_.1 EC'-ICNIA C'R9il (bllicr Boulez aid Green Roulevwd Golden Gate Pxcki 4D 525 ❑. 1 N 2.30U 1.420 1730 -3 It) ---I NSl 49 0 49 I469 831_ 639% _._ EC-TCNIA CK951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Pxvk�' Golden Gate Main Canal 4D 607 n N 2,300 1.901) 1860 -61) 79 162 241 1041 259 88 7':L 32.3 EC-fCNIA CR9il Collier Boulclard Golder Gale Main Canal 1-75 I 607 E N 3-600 1,800 18611 -60 431 60 25X 31X line 1492 5N48% 33.0 EC -I CNIA SR951 _Collie, Boule-d 1-7 Davis Boulclard ND i73 E N 3.600 2.260 3i6o -11100 --,-:_ „ 36 277 313 2573 )U27 715".L 340 C'R9il Collier Boulevard Dux is Boulc, atl Raulesnake Hammock Road 6D IS N 3,000 I. U'0 2130 0 O.00% 156 297 45" 2i83 417 86.1" 35 0 CR951 Callicr Boulevard Raldcsnakc Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D _6112 603 E N 3 200 2.030 2060 -III ,i 4'!'6 284 137 421 1471 721) 77'"6 36.1 _ SK951 Collier Boulclard US 41(Tamiamr Trail) Wal-NIwLDmcuay LD 5:7 F 11 2�:110 2,230 1150 NII K59% 1 3,4 67 201 1431 69 9721';, 36.2 SR9il Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driv ,ax Manatee Road 4D 557 D N 20I10 2-230 1920 310 13-711i;, 12i 33 INN 2388 IF5S1 119.4"6 37.0 _ SR951 Callicr Boulcvaid iManatec Road Nlainsail Di ix c D. N 2,200 1,730 I690 40 231"L IXI 40 21-1 1931 1_49 997"i 340 SR931 Collier Boulclard Main-1 Drivc Marco Island B,idgc _4D 4D _6_27 627 D N 2.100 1,730 1690 40 231"L -_ '(1 1_' 44 1774 426 90 O"L 39.0 N%N'-'rCN1A CRX46 I I I01 A -to, N :Gulfshac Drixo Vandc, bi l t Dr 1, c '_U is D E 7IIII 320 '_90 30 91V. 0 II 321) 3811 4i T!., 40.0 NW-ICNIA CRX46 II Ith Avcnuc N. Vaodcrbill Or US 41(Twniwni Trail) '1U 613 D E 91111 iN(I i611 211 3-4i";, 0 II U iNU 32u 64.4';, 41.1 NW-TCN1A _ CR946 �Lmuokalce Road US 41 (Tamiarm Trail) G.,dlcuc-Frank Road 6D E E 3.100 1.960 _'_'_1) -1-60 -1 , 27' II 1963 1137 63 T! i. 412 NW-fCNIA CRX46 Immokalcc Road Good lcuc-Frank Road 'Airport Road 6D _366 615 E E 3.11111 2,110 '700 -full -3O s1". ') 0 9 2119 991 � 0%4'.'L 421 N\1'-TCMA CRX46 Inunukalce Road Airport Road Ln mgsmn Road 6D n7 E Vi 3.100 2.100 2360 -260 -12 Js'„ 11 0 II III 9X9 681''., 42.2 Nl1'-TCN1A CRX46 �Inmmkalec Road �Li, ingsmn Road 1-7i 6D/8D 679 E k 3.5110 3,111) 3020 90 2N9"6 30 (1 30 3140 360 g97''f 4"1 CR846 bnmukalcc Road 1-75 'Logan Boulcvaid 6DMD 701 F E 3,500 2,320 2620 -300 -11')T'11 457 7X 535 2953 ,45 XI6'IL 432 CRX46 Immokalcc Road llmnolkalco Logan Boulclard Collier Boulclard 6D 636 E E 3201) fell 2030 250 10.96% 92.4 91 911) 3199 1 101111";, 44.0 C'K%46 Road ._Collier Boulcxard Wilson Boulevard 6D 674 E E 3.=.00 -710 2480 230 8.I9°L 935 iN 993 3703 14�),1 11""6 4i-O CR946 'Ilnunokalce Road Wilson Buulcxwd Oil Well Road 6D 67i E l: 3.3,00 2,200 2310 -110 -; ul r'-„ 409 %9 498 169X 2 NI 8". 460 CR846 Immokalcc Read Oil Well Road SR 29 2U 672 D E � 900 510 480 30 5- V;1 IXI 38 111) 719 161171 81 O".. Ill's '1L'7 1017 2015 2112i _'1130 20111 '_IIIX I 2023 Existing Existing I 2018 '017 '0'a Eci1Ling 'B.iI MASTER Auaclouent F-2021 (071221.1)-xlsm 10 Attachment "F" Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (.AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS,1 rip Bunk and Traffic Counts Peak 21121 2020 Net Percent 2021 2021 ll affi, Hour' Peak Peak Change Change 2021 2021 Counts+ 2021 wfl'B Counts Tiip Bank Peak Di. Hour Hour In Volume In Volume 2021 t/7"' Total Counts+ Trip Bank Counts+ L Year ) ear TCNIA or Exist Gut. Nlin Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Di, Frum Fr our 'Trip Trip Tt ip Trip Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected TCTA Rmd$ Link 1)tlom To Read Ste. SW • Dir Volume Volume Volume 2020 2020 Bank Bank Bank Voiumr C]nacite NIX S BeBelmi liefnient 41 a Lake Tr al lord Road Cars n Rd SR 29 _ 'U Luz D E New 490 5011 -21) -.I 1., 107 4 113 iy: _u7 7.a I". 490 Lorwt,Boul-rd Vandebill Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 2U i87 D N I,000 i9(1 (121) -30 -i lu"„ 68 19 N7 677 323 67 7" L 490 EC-TCNIA LuWBaulcsald Pine Ridge Read G. ccn Boulevard 4D 598 D S 1,9oll 1,490 Ii30 -4a -26V., 50 0 50 1540 360 81 1'! i. 500 Logan Boulcsmd Immokalcc Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U (44 D N 1.000 01) 670 20 -iHV.1 4 30 34 6N4 316 fill 4" 51.0 N%V-TCNIA CRNNI Livingston Road Impeiral Skcet Inunokalcc Road _ 6d4D 673 D N 3.000 1-770 1410 360 20-34u.L 119 0 119 I%N'/ IIII 63_0`,6 520 NWTC'NIA CR%NI ILmngsmn Road Immokalce Rend _Vander bi It Beach Read 6D i76 E _ N 3.10(I 1.7511 220 -470 -'6 Sip„ 12 0 22 1772 1328 572% 530 NW-TCMA CR991 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Bcach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E 1 N 3.1110 1.490 Boll -70 -4 711".. 0 II 11 1490 16111 4N I";. 54.0 EC-'fCNIA CRNR I LivorgsLeu Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 3_IO(1 1.310 1330 11 0 My"Y . 5(, 1) 56 1386 1714 44 7"„ 5i.0 EC=1C'NIA CRNNI 'Lisingskm Road Gulden Gate Parka:ks Read 6D 6N7 E N 3.000 1_68I1 I820 -140 _8 32. 0 __ 1712 1299 57.1".6 1140 N.IstSow 'Nc,s Nlmkel Road _Radio SR-29(Main Sued) 2U 590 D N 'lull 620 650 -30 -454'b 17 7 24 044 256 7[.6% _190 New Market Road 'Brosvard Street SR 19 2U 611 D E 900 610 570 40 6 i(i.'i, 24 4 2.4 638 '62 70 9";, 61.0 Camp Keats Oil Well Road Immokalcc Read 2U 626A D S 1.000 29II 2N0 111 3 4i'.'. 144 67 211 it 499 ill I"6 62.0 NW-TCNIA CR897 Old US41 'Lee Count, Line US 411Tmuiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 1 1.000 1.060 1120 -60 11111''11 9 (1 9 I067 ir,v) I06.9";, 63.0 NW-1 CNIA CR896 iSe.gaLe Drive 'CIa)I-Road US 41(Turniami Trail) 4D 511 D E �.. 1.70IJ 840 790 -Li0 -1756"„ 0 U (1 840 860 40,4% 640 NW-TCNIA CRN96Pine Ridge Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Go.dlcue-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2-N00 1910 I950 -40 -' tl')"„ 17 0 17 1917 %73 68 8"6 650 NW-TCNIA CRN96 Pine Ridge Road GoodlCLlc-FimrkRoad Shi110Sued 6D 514 E E 1 2,1400 2_I61) 2430 -270 -1_;n';6 20 0 10 'INU 620 779"L 66.0 NW-'fCNIA CR896 Pine Ridge Road 'Shirle)Street Airport Road 6D i15 E E 2.800 3.030 3231) =00 4,60.6 23 (1 _13 3053 I_1�3) 109.0% 67.1 NW-'fCNIA CR%96 Pinc Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 526 E E 3,900 3,310 3i411 -210 -, i F., 17 0 17 3347 553 145.8"- 671 EC-TCNIA CR896 iPine Ridge Road I Livingston Road 1-75 6D 618 E E 3900 2050 3130 -90 -I8111l„ 84 0 84 1734 1166 701% 6S0 EC-'TCMA CRN96 Pine Ridge Road i1-75 Logan Boulcvaid (,D 600 E E 2.800 2A80 241I01 81) 323'.'L 126 0 126 2606 194 931'. 69.0 CR856 :Radio Road AirportRoad Livingston Road 4D 544 D E �� 4800 I030 1160: -130 -126"" 58 I) SN IU%% 72 60 4,;. 70.0 EC-TCNIA CRN56 Radio Road :Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E I,N110 1.490 1440 50 3 36%. 31) 0 31) 15211 281) 84 4'!. 710 EC-TCNIA CR856 RadioRead Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Back, and 4D 695 D W I,Moo 630 6911 -60 -9i ';, 45 45 130 760 1040 422"6 720 CRNW Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41(Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulcvaici 4D 316 D E I.%I711 1.020 1(rK0 -60 -iN%': 114 11 115 114i 655 636"L 73.0 'IC'EA(pL) CR8f,4 Rattlesnake Hammock Read Char lemagne Boulevard Court) Barn Road 4D i17 D E 1„8(I(1 900 8411 60 6.67% %% II 97 999 Not :_.:.,, 740 C'R864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Count)Bam Road I Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D E I,')O(1 NIIII NIIII 0 ILIIII",6 67 18 85 SNS 1015 46 6!., 75.0 CRN64 Rattlesnake Hammock Roid ,Smrla Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D SIN E lV 2.900 770 740 30 3.90N. 106 75 191 951 1949 31 WN. 76.11 E6TCNIA _'Santa Barbara Boulcvmd Green Boulcvard Golden Gate Pgrke y 4D _ _ 329 D N 21011 1,540 1i9II_ -51 II 0 0 1540 S60 73.3";, 77.0 EC=fCNIA Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden GaLe Pm9:uay :Radio Road 6D 52N E N 3.100 2.120 2240 -12II -561P„ 54 0 i4 2174 9'6 70 1 78 (1 EC=1"CNIA Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3.1ou 1,430 1481) -50 -. ,,, 255 O 255 1685 141i 544"L 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Dav is Boulevard RaWcsnake-Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3.I IIII N90 740 -50 -i (c, 16, 0 262 11 i2 194N 37 2"L 80d1 SR29 SR29 US 41(Tamiami Ti ail) !CR N37(Janes Scenic Dr) 1_U 61iA D N 900 140 151) -I(I -714"„ 11 0 0 140 760 IS(116 M 1.0 SR29 SR 29 CR N37 (Janes Scenic Dr) II-75 2U 615A D N 900 140 I50 -10 -7 1 I"" 11 0 0 140 760IS t1,';, 81 (1 SR29 '',SR 29 �1-75 :Oil Well Road 2U 615A D N 900 140 I511 _[0 -7 11"f, 4% 1') 67 207 693 13 0'.'L 83 0 SR29 'SR 29 011 Well Road ICR _9A South 2U 665A D N 900 440 420 2U 4 55"i, 541 25 71) 519 381 57-T:;, 840 SR29 SR 29 CR29ASouth 9111Soect. 4D 664 D NV 1.70(1 610 61e -IU - loll., ION 34 142 7i1 948 44 2".. N511 SR29 SR 29 91.11 Street CR 19A North 2U 663 D S 900 700 650 ill 7 14". 71 21 91_ 792 ION NN 0% 960 SR29 SK 29 1CR 29A North SR 81 lU 663 D S 900 71111 Gill 50 7 14';;, 46 22 (,8 768 1112 Ni I'-„ 870 SR29 SR 29 'Hcndn Count' Line ISR 82 2U i9LA D S %IIII 301) 390 90 -3n art"" 7 3 IT 311) 490 38 N".6 880 SR82 SRN2 Lee CeuntALine SR 19 1Airpart 2U 66 ]A D _ S %IIII 7-10 7'90 0 II-IIII"/„ 41 14 ii %45 ,41) 10i06 91 (I 'I CEA U541 'Tamiami Trail East ID:nis Boulev wal Road GD _54i E _ E 2900 1,560 16111 -Sll d'I"„ INU 2 %1_ 1742 IISN� GUI". 910 TCEA IJS41 Tamimni Trail East AigwiI Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2.9011 2.820 1781) 40 1.42"L 257 90 337 3157 I'i7)' 109 T;F 930 _ US41 Tamimni Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard _6D 572 E E 3,000 IJ90 1991) -190 447 135 592 1_371_ 628 79 1"L 94-0 US41 �Tumimni Trail East Triangle Boulevard Copier Boulevard 6D 571 E E 3.000 L6111 1690 -NO -4 9,"„ 266 91 357 1967 1033 6i 60'6 93 1 US41 Tani Trail East Collier Boulcsmd Joseph Lane 6D GUN E E 3.100 Nit 900 -50 -i w" , 529 110 Six 1409 1692 i 454"6 95 2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane IGiccnvvay Road 4D 604 D E 2,(II11 850 900 -5o -i w 234 71) 313 1163 937 58 TN. 95 3 US41 1'I amiwmi Trail Eat Greene ay Road ''San Nlmco Drive lU WIN D E 1,075 N511 900 SU -i S.S, 141 27 169 [111 N 57 94 7" 960 US41 Tamimni Trail East San Marco Diivu SR29 _ 2lJ 617A D E ]dull) 10 220 -IU -4 7(,-, G 11 6 216 7N4 216"5. 970 US41 Tamimni Trail East SR29 1Dade County Line 2U GIGA D _ E I.II I 190 190 -10 -i ,,,. K 0 8 I%N M12 IN N "6 9,40 NW-TCMA US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee Count, Lure 'Wiggins Pass Road 6D 546 E N 3r100 2.010 1150 -140 -0 77"., 49 N 57 1067 I033 � 66 7"6 990 NW--TCMA US41 Tammmi Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalcc Road 6D 5W E N 3.1011 2.970 27111 ill L6M9 . 46 N 54 3024 76 97 IOU(\ NW-TCMA US41 Tmniruni Trail North hurnukalcc Road 'Vandeibilt Beach Road 6D 577 E N 3,410 2.00 19511 IOU 4_lim;. 18 0 I% 2068 1342 60.6"„ 1011) NW-TCMA US41 Tannanri Trail North Vandn bilt Beach Road _ 'Gulf Park Drive 6D 563 E N 3.100 2-430 2600 -171) -7we!.. Ili II Ili 2146 654 799"L 1021) NW=TCMA US41 Tamiami Trail North IGull'Park Drive Pinc Ridge Road 6D 361 E •' N 3,4I0 2?90 2340 -51) -2 IN"„ 0 IT 0 2290 1110 67 17., 108 (1 I-CEA(pL) rhemassun Drive Bgvshem Drive US 41 \Tamiami Trail) 2U ('98 D E NIIII 5_111 5911 -70 -1; 4Y'„ 66 4 70 590 2111 73 N";, ExisLing Existing Evisting ExiSLing 2029 _11125 11130 1019 1_030 '022 Existing '023 E<isting 'IC4 21C_ 11 MASTER AOachnient F-2U21 (971221,1)•xlsm TRAFFIC COUNTS LAKE TRAFFORD RD @ CARSON RD File Name: Lake Trafford Rd @ Carson Rd AM Location: Carson Rd Southbound Time Right Thru Left U- Appr Turn Total 07:00 8 23 14 0 45 07:15 11 10 20 0 41 07:30 14 25 27 0 66 07:45 8 24 18 0 50 Total 41 82 79 0 202 08:00 5 13 14 0 32 08:15 1 6 11 7 25 08:30 8 15 13 0 36 08:45 4 7 11 0 22 Total 18 41 49 7 115 0 0 0 0 0 Grand 59 123 128 7 317 Total Appr 18.6 38.8 40.4 02.2 Total 03.6 07.4 07.7 00.4 % 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 AM 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Pk Hr AM 41 82 79 0 202 Pk Vol AM 0.732 0.820 0.731 NaN 0.765 PHF Lake Trafford Rd @ Carson Rd AM All Vehicles Lake Traffrod Rd Westbound Right Thru Left U- Appr Turn Total 17 63 9 0 89 12 77 8 0 97 9 49 9 0 67 5 29 4 0 38 43 218 30 0 291 10 39 8 0 57 11 29 9 0 49 8 23 7 0 38 10 32 9 0 51 39 123 33 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 82 341 63 0 486 16.9 70.2 13.0 00.0 04.9 20.5 03.8 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 - 00.0 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 43 218 30 0 291 0.632 0.708 0.833 NaN 0.750 Carson Rd Northbound Right Thru Left U- Appr Turn Total 18 19 6 0 43 13 9 14 0 36 12 19 19 0 50 17 5 8 0 30 60 52 47 0 159 9 8 3 0 20 9 12 4 0 25 16 6 2 0 24 10 5 2 0 17 44 31 11 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 104 83 58 0 245 42.4 33.9 23.7 00.0 06.3 05.0 03.5 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 - 00.0 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 60 52 47 0 159 0.833 0.684 0.618 NaN 0.795 Site Code: Study Date: 10/20/2021 Lake Traffrod Rd Eastbound Right Thru Left U-Turn Appr Int Total Total 10 53 7 0 70 247 12 61 8 0 81 255 6 70 10 0 86 269 16 85 9 0 110 228 44 269 34 0 347 999 8 72 6 0 86 195 7 51 5 0 63 162 5 55 3 0 63 161 6 45 3 0 54 144 26 223 17 0 266 662 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 492 51 0 613 1661 11.4 80.3 08.3 00.0 04.2 29.6 03.1 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 - 00.0 00.0 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 44 269 34 0 347 999 0.688 0.791 0.850 NaN 0.789 0.928 COUNTpro Turning Movement Report: Page 1 of 2 CountingCars.com Lake Trafford Rd @ Carson Rd AM File Name: Lake Trafford Rd @ Carson Rd AM Site Code: Location: All Vehicles Study Date! 10/20/2021 c O F 7 O � �a H a, Y N F l0 J Carson Rd 41 82 79 0 Right Thru Left (U---TTuurrrn, V AM Peak Hour Statistics AM Peak Hour Begins: 07:00 AM Peak Hour Volume: 999 AM Peak Hour Factor: 0.928 0 oi, t r U-Turn Left Thru Right 0 47 52 60 Carson Rd � W r su r � � �o 00 'm c. c C C Q� C cCD V COUNTpro Turning Movement Report: Page 2 of 2 CountingCars.com Report Title 1 Report Title 2 Report Title 3 File Name: Lake Trafford Rd @ Carson Rd PM Site Code: Location: All Vehicles Study Date: 10/20/2021 Time 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 Total 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 Total Grand Total Appr Total PM Pk Hr PM Pk Vol PM PHF Carson Rd Southbound U- Appr Right Thru Left Turn Total 8 10 9 0 27 12 19 17 0 48 11 17 15 0 43 16 25 20 0 61 Lake Traffrod Rd Westbound Right Thru Left U- Appr Turn Total 13 75 28 0 116 32 68 19 0 119 13 77 11 0 101 22 69 11 0 102 Carson Rd Northbound Right Thru Left U- Appr Turn Total 14 25 10 0 49 15 22 7 0 44 13 26 13 0 52 12 27 16 0 55 47 71 61 0 179 80 289 69 0 438 54 100 46 0 200 19 13 18 0 50 29 89 13 0 131 13 19 18 0 50 16 16 23 0 55 25 106 16 0 147 14 26 12 0 52 11 33 19 0 63 19 88 19 0 126 20 22 10 0 52 16 30 16 0 62 20 103 20 0 143 17 20 16 0 53 62 92 76 0 230 93 386 68 0 547 64 87 56 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 163 137 0 409 173 675 137 0 985 118 187 102 0 407 26.7 39.9 33.5 00.0 17.6 68.5 13.9 00.0 29.0 45.9 25.1 00.0 04.7 07.0 05.8 00.0 07.4 28.8 05.8 00.0 05.0 08.0 04.4 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 - 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 - 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 - 00.0 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 62 92 76 0 230 0.816 0.697 0.826 NaN 0.913 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 93 386 68 0 547 0.802 0.910 0.850 NaN 0.930 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 64 87 56 0 207 0.800 0.837 0.778 NaN 0.976 Lake Traffrod Rd Eastbound Right Thru Left U-Turn Appr Int Total Total 1 40 8 0 49 241 7 48 7 0 62 273 7 41 6 0 54 250 4 45 5 0 54 272 19 174 26 0 219 1036 5 50 8 0 63 294 11 67 6 0 84 338 9 80 14 0 103 344 3 63 8 0 74 332 28 260 36 0 324 1308 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 434 62 0 543 2344 08.7 79.9 11.4 00.0 02.0 18.5 02.6 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 28 260 36 0 324 1308 0.636 0.813 0.643 NaN 0.786 0.951 COUNTpro Turning Movement Report: Page 1 of 2 CountingCars.com File Name: Lake Trafford Rd @ Carson Rd PM Location: Report Title 1 Report Title 2 Report Title 3 All Vehicles Carson Rd 62 92 76 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn PM Peak Hour Statistics PM Peak Hour Begins: 17:00 PM Peak Hour Volume: 1308 PM Peak Hour Factor: 0.951 U-Turn Left Thru Right 0 56 87 64 Carson Rd Site Code: Study Date: 10/20/2021 COUNTpro Turning Movement Report: Page 2 of 2 CountingCars.com FDOT PEAK SEASON FACTOR 2020 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 0300 COLLIER COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.87 WEEK DATES SF PSCF * 1 01/01/2020 - 01/04/2020 0.92 ----------------------4 1.06 * 2 01/05/2020 - 01/11/2020 0.87 1.00 * 3 01/12/2020 - 01/18/2020 0.81 0.93 * 4 01/19/2020 - 01/25/2020 0.80 0.92 * 5 01/26/2020 - 02/01/2020 0.79 0.91 * 6 02/02/2020 = 02/08/2020 0..77 0.89 * 7 02/09/2020 - 02/15/2020 0.76 0.87 * 8 02/16/2020 - 02/22/2020 0.81 0.93 * 9 02/23/2020 - 02/29/2020 0.85 0.98 *10 03/01/2020 - 03/07/2020 0.90 1.03 *11 03/08/2020 - 03/14/2020 0.94 i.08 *12 03/15/2020 - 03/21/2020 0.99 1.14 *13 03/22/2020 - 03/28/2020 1.14 1.31 14 03/29/2020 - 04/04/2020 2.29 1.48 15 04/05/2020 - 04/11/2020 1.44 1.66 16 04/12/2020 - 04/18/2020 1..59 1.83 17 04/19/2020 _ 04/25/2020 1.48 1.70 18 04/26/2020 - 05/02/2020 2.37 1.57 19 05/03/2020 - 05/09/2020 1.25 1.44 20 05/10/2020 _ 05/16/2020 �.14 1.31 21 05/17/2020 - 05/23/2020 1.13 1.30 22 05/24/2020 - 05/30/2020 1.12 1.29 23 05/31/2020 - 06/06/2020 1.11 1.28 24 06/07/2020 - 06/13/2020 1.10 1.26 25 06/14/2020 - 06/20/2020 1.08 1.24 26 06/21/2020 - 06/27/2020 1.09 1.25 27 06/28/2020 - 07/04/2020 1.09 1.25 28 07/05/2020 - 07/11/2020 1.09 1.25 29 07/12/2020 - 07/18/2020 1.09 1.25 30 07/19/2020:- 07/25/2020 1.07 1.23 31 07/26/2020 - 08/01/2020 1.05 1.21 32 08/02/2020 - 08/08/2020 1.03 1.18 33 08/09/2020 - 08/15/2020 1.01 1.16 34 08/16/2020 - 08/22/2020 1.01 1.16 35 08/23/2020'- 08/29/2020 1.01 1.16 36 08/30/2020 - 09/05/2020 1.01 1.16 37 09/06/2020 - 09/12/2020 1.02 1.17 38 09/13/2020 - 09/19/2020 1.02 1.17 39 09/20/2020 - 09/26/2020 1.03 1.18 40 09/27/2020 - 10/03/2020 1.03 1.18 41 10/04/2020 - 10/10/2020 1.04 1.20 42 10/11/2020 - 10/17/2020 1.05 1.21 43 10/18/2020 - 10/24/2020 1.04 1.20 44 10/25/2020 - 10/31/2020 1.04 1.20 45 11/01/2020 - 11/07/2020 1.04 1.20 46 11/08/2020 _ 11/14/2020 1.03 1.18 47 11/15/2020 - 11/21/2020 1.03 1.18 48 11/22/2020 - 11/28/2020 1.00 1.15 49 11/29/2020 - 12/05/2020 0.98 1.13 50 12/06/2020 - 12/12/2020 0.95 1.09 51 12/13/2020 - 12/19/2020 0.92 1.06 52 12/20/2020 - 12/26/2020 0.87 1.00 53 12/27/2020 - 12/31/2020 0.81 0.93 * PEAK SEASON 27-FEB-2021 10:29:51 830UPD 1 0300 PKSEASON.TXT DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE YEAR BACKGROUND TURNING VOLUMES Development of Future Year Background Turning Volumes Intersection Lake Trafford Rd @ Carson Rd Count Date October 20, 2021 Build -Out Year 2026 RAW Turning Movement Counts Peak Season Correction Factor Current Peak Season Volumes Growth Rate Years to Build -out 2026 Background Turning Volume! Project Turning Volumes 2026 Background + Project RAW Turning Movement Counts Peak Season Correction Factor Current Peak Season Volumes Growth Rate Years to Build -out 2026 Background Turning Volume! Project Turning Volumes 2026 Background + Project AM Peak Hour NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 47 52 60 79 82 41 34 269 44 30 218 43 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 56 62 72 95 98 49 41 323 53 36 262 52 2.64% 2.64% 2.64% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2 00% 2.00% 2.00% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 64 71 82 105 108 54 45 357 59 40 289 57 12 6 17 116 33 40 76 71 82 105 108 60 62 473 92 40 329 57 PM Peak Hour NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 56 87 64 76 92 62 36 260 28 68 386 93 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 67 104 77 91 110 74 43 312 34 82 463 112 2.64% 2.64% 2.64% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2 00% 2 00% 2.00% 2.00% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 76 118 88 100 121 82 47 344 38 91 511 124 39 20 12 80 23 136 115 118 88 100 121 102 59 424 61 91 647 124 SIGNAL TIMINGS Controller Number 1 Controller Name Test 1 Main St. Side St. NTCIP Receive Port Automatic NTCIP Send Port 161 NTCIP Timeoutj 1000 Unit Parameters Startup Flash 6 All Red Exit 0 MCE Seq.1 MaxTime Basic Default Timing Sheet Auto Ped Cirl Disable Gm Flash Freq.1 60 Primary Startl 0 Red Revert 1 4 Yel Flash Freq.1 60 Secondary Start 0 Backup Time 600 jExtMode Itnoble MCE Enable I Enable Free Seq. 1 EW 61 0 1! L M Sb Phase Parametersrs Phases 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Walk Time 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clear Time 0 16 0 10 0 10 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Don't Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min Green 5 15 0 10 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passage 3 5 0 4 3 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max-1 10 55 0 15 10 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yel Change 4.8 4.8 3 4.4 4.8 4.8 3 4.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Red Clear 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red Revert 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Initial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max Initial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time B4 Reduce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars B4 Reduce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduce By 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min Gap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dyn Max Limit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dyn Max Step 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delayed Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delay Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alt Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Alt Ped Clr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre Clearance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Add Red Clear 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phases 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Walk Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clear Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Don't Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yel Change 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Red Clear 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red Revert 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Initial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max Initial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time B4 Reduce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars B4 Reduce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduce By 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min Gap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dyn Max Limit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dyn Max Step 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delayed Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delay Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alt Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alt Ped Cirl 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre Clearance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0po+ 0 0 0 0 0 qo= Add Red Clear 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 Phase Options -•-©©m©©©m©mmmmmmmmmmmm •• mmm©mmm©mmmmmmmmmmmm •- a©mmm©mmmammmmmmmmmm Non Actuatedmmmmmmmmammmmmmmmmma Non Actuated 11 mmmmmmmmmaammmmmmmmm •-©©m©©©m©ammmmammmmmm ---a©mmm©mmammmmmmmmmmm Max Veh Recallammmmmmmammmmmmmmmmm - - • - - - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Soft eh RE.Lallmmmmmmmaammmmammmmmm Dual Entry mmm©mmm©mmmmmmmmmmmm •mammmmmmmammmmmmmmmm --mmmmmmmmemmaaaammmmm MERI•• mamammmaammmmmmmmmmm --mmmm®mmmmm®mmo®mmmmm •-ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm •- mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmamm •• ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm • - - • mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm • • - • mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm • ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm - - - • ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Max Veh Recallmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm - - • - - - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmma • - - - - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm -•mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm --mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm • • - - ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Additional Phase Options --• • - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm - - • • - - • mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm • - - - - mmmmmmmmmmmmammmmmmm Yel Min •dmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmamm • Startup mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm •---mmmmmmmmmmmammmmmmmm • - - • • - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmamm --• mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm -mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Flash Exit -•Call mmmmmmmmmmmmmammmmmm -mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm -mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm - - - - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm - - - - - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm - - • - - - mmmammmmmmmmmammammm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Schedules Day Plan F 1 Description Days of Week Sunday Days of Month Month of Year J F M A M J S M T T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X A S0 N ❑ 23J 24 25 26 27 2 29 30 31 X X X XXXXXX X X X X X X X I X Day PlanF-21 Description Weekday Days of Month Month of Year Days of Week I J F M A M J S M T T F1 S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 X X X X X X , 1XI XI X X1 xj X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X J A 5 Q N ❑ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 26 27 28 29 30 31 k XI XI X1 X1 X ( X X X X X X X X I X I X X I X I X I X Day PlanF-Ti Description Saturday Days of Month Month of Year Days of Week I J F M A M J S1 M T14 T F S 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 1 7 8 1 9 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 X X X X X X . X X X X X X X X X X I X X X X X X X J A S 0 IN 1)17 X 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 24 25 126 27 28 29 30 31 XXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X li SEEM -- ._ ys of Month oo©m©o©©o�oo©o©©o©0000mmmmmmm eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa MINIMUM mmmQ]®®®m®m®mmm®■ eeeeee mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm e©©©©©©e©�o©©o©©o©0000mmmmmmm �eeeeeeeseeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa oo©o©o mmmmmmmm®mmmmmm. eeeeee aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa o©©o©o©�o�oo©o©©o©0000mmmmmmm eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa MEM mmmm®®®m®mmmmm® eeeeee�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ... �IT -- oo©o©o©©©goo©o©©o©0000mmmmmmm eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa MEM mmmm®®®m®mmmmm® eeeeee aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa� ._ Days of—mo-nth eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa oo©o©o mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm■ eeeeee aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Day Plan 79 1 Description Days of Month Month of Year Days of Week J F M A M J SIMIT14TIFIS 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 1 16 J A SJOINIDI 17 181 191 20 21 1 22 1 23 1 24 1 25 1 26 1 27 1 28 1 29 30 1 31 o©©o©o©©o�oo©o©©o©ooe�ommmmmmm eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ©©©om© mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm eeeeee aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa� r. a. mo©ome©©�W©©©o©©o©0000mmmmmmm eeee ee a ee e e e e as a aaa aaa aaa aaa a oo©a©o mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm eeeeee Nsaaiaaaaaaaaaaaa� eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa e©©o©© mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm eeeeee mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm o©®o©e©©o�oo©o©©o©0000mmmmmmm eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa o®©ono mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm eeeeee aammmmmmmmmmmmm Days of Month Czmmmm?'5w1=t eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa oo©o©o mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm eeeeee mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa oo©o©o mmmmmmmmmmmmmm® eeeeee aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa� Day Plan n Even Hour Min. Act 1 0 0 64 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 1 0 ❑ay Plan n Even Hour Min, Act 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 Day Plan 2 Evenj Hour I Min. Act 1 0 1 64 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 Day Plan n Evenj Hour Min. I Act 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 Day Plan n Everil Hour Min. Act 1 0 0 64 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 Day Plan n (Evenj Hour I Min. Act 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 ❑ay Plan 5 Day Plan 16 I Day Plan I + I Day Plan 4 Eveni Hour Min. Act 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 Day Plan n lEvenl Hour Min. Act 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 Day Plan FBI I mWW=m■e■■■■■■■■■ ®lm�eee■■■■■■■■ m�meee■■■■■■■■ WWOT-ml ne■■■■■■■■■■ iE7 NEMESES■■■■. m�eee■■■■■■e■ m�e■■■■■■■■■■ m�e■■■■■■■■■■ mm-mmoeee■■■■■■■■ -. - Nee■■■■■■■■ - Nee■■■■■■■� m�eee■■■■■■e■ me�eee■■■■■■■■ m�eee■e■■■■■■ m�eeeeeee■■■■ SYNCHRO SUMMARY SHEETS LAKE TRAFFORD RD @ CARSON RD 2026 AM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 2026 AM Pk Hr Background 11/01/2021 --I. --v 4- *-- I * -V Lane Group EBL EST EBR WBL W13T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� T 4� +T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 45 357 59 40 289 57 64 71 82 105 108 54 Future Volume (vph) 45 357 59 40 289 57 64 71 82 105 108 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 145 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 50 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.979 0.975 0.949 0.973 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.981 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1824 0 1770 1816 0 0 1741 0 0 1778 0 Flt Permitted 0.431 0.329 0.819 0.784 Satd. Flow (perm) 803 1824 0 613 1816 0 u 1448 0 0 1421 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 14 17 31 13 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 577 803 425 473 Travel Time (s) 8.7 12.2 9.7 10.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 388 64 43 314 62 70 77 89 114 117 59 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 49 452 0 43 376 0 0 236 0 0 290 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 Total Split (s) 10.0 55.0 10.0 55.0 15.0 15.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 61.1 % 11.1 % 61.1 % 16.7% 16.7% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 3.2 48.2 3.2 48.2 8.6 8.6 18.6 18.6 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.4 6.4 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 21.7 20.0 21.7 20.0 19.2 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.34 0.37 0.34 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.71 0.15 0.59 0.47 0.61 Control Delay 9.3 23.4 9.5 19.7 20.1 26.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.3 23.4 9.5 19.7 20.1 26.2 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2026 AM Pk Hr Background I Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 11/01/2021 --1. ')v 4\ t # Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR LOS A C A B C C Approach Delay 22.0 18.6 20.1 26.2 Approach LOS C B C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 144 8 112 61 88 Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 234 21 186 147 #229 Internal Link Dist (ft) 497 723 345 393 Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 255 Base Capacity (vph) 355 1538 294 1532 498 477 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.29 0.15 0.25 0.47 0.61 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 58.1 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Soliis and Phases: 3: Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 01 02 t04 116 5 --*06 T 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings I Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 2026 AM Pk Hr With Project 11/01/2021 --,, I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ T 4� +T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 62 473 92 40 329 57 76 71 82 105 108 60 Future Volume (vph) 62 473 92 40 329 57 76 71 82 105 108 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 145 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 50 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.976 0.978 0.952 0.970 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.984 0.981 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1818 0 1770 1822 0 0 1745 0 0 1773 0 Flt Permitted 0.406 0.198 0.763 0.763 Satd. Flow (perm) 756 1818 0 369 1822 0 0 1353 0 0 1379 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 15 28 14 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 577 803 425 473 Travel Time (s) 8.7 12.2 9.7 10.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 67 514 100 43 358 62 83 77 89 114 117 65 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 67 614 0 43 420 0 0 249 0 0 296 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4f 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 Total Split (s) 10.0 55.0 10.0 55.0 15.0 15.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 61.1 % 11.1 % 61.1 % 16.7% 16.7% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 3.2 48.2 3.2 48.2 8.6 8.6 18.6 18.6 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.4 6.4 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 28.5 26.9 28.5 26.9 19.6 19.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.41 0.44 0.41 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.81 0.19 0.56 0.59 0.70 Control Delay 8.5 26.0 9.1 17.1 29.4 35.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.5 26.0 9.1 17.1 29.4 35.8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2026 AM Pk Hr With Project 3: Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 11/01/2021 --I, ')v k- I /,* t Lane Group ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NSR SBL SBT SBR LOS A C A B C D Approach Delay 24.3 16.3 29.4 35.8 Approach LOS C B C D Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 223 8 130 84 113 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 340 19 203 #231 #305 Internal Link Dist (ft) 497 723 345 393 Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 255 Base Capacity (vph) 381 1401 232 1404 424 421 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 018 044 0.19 0.30 0.59 070 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 65.5 Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 5puts and rnases: 3: (;arson Rd & LaKe I rattord Rd 01 1 4-- 02 t04 fl"O I ­006 14 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2026 PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2026 PM Pk Hr Background I Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 11/01/2021 � 'r � I 110. t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ 1� 43� 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 47 344 38 91 511 124 76 118 88 100 121 82 Future Volume (vph) 47 344 38 91 511 124 76 118 88 100 121 82 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 145 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 50 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.985 0.971 0.958 0.964 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.987 0.984 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1835 0 1770 1809 0 0 1761 0 0 1767 0 Flt Permitted 0.168 0.414 0.759 0.722 Satd. Flow (perm) 313 1835 0 771 1809 0 0 1354 0 0 1296 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 21 23 19 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 577 803 425 473 Travel Time (s) 8.7 12.2 9.7 10.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 51 374 41 99 555 135 83 128 96 109 132 89 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 51 415 0 99 690 0 0 307 0 0 330 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 Total Split (s) 10.0 55.0 10.0 55.0 15.0 15.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 61.1 % 11.1 % 61.1 % 16.7% 16.7% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 3.2 48.2 3.2 48.2 8.6 8.6 18.6 18.6 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.4 6.4 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 31.9 29.4 33.5 31.9 19.6 19.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.42 0.48 0.45 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.54 0.24 0.83 0.78 0.88 Control Delay 9.6 17.2 8.7 26.2 43.4 56.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.6 17.2 8.7 26.2 43.4 56.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2026 PM Pk Hr Background I Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 11/01/2021 -,* --I, *-- t # Lane Croup _ ] BL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S8T SBR LOS A B A C D E Approach Delay 16.4 24.0 43.4 56.0 Approach LOS B C D E Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 130 19 268 127 144 Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 199 37 403 #340 #385 Internal Link Dist (ft) 497 723 345 393 Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 255 Base Capacity (vph) 211 1322 414 1306 392 373 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.24 0.31 0.24 0.53 078 0.88 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 70.5 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits ana rnases: S: uarson Ka & uaKe i rarrora rta .4--- 01 �7 { 04 35_ 1 �636 I T 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2026 PM Pk Hr With Project I Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd --,, --)v t 1I11/01/2021 t41 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� ►j 1r+ 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 59 424 61 91 647 124 115 118 88 100 121 102 Future Volume (vph) 59 424 61 91 647 124 115 118 88 100 121 102 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 145 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 50 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.981 0.976 0.963 0.957 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.982 0.985 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1827 0 1770 1818 0 0 1762 0 0 1756 0 Flt Permitted 0.098 0.348 0.653 0.708 Satd. Flow (perm) 183 1827 0 648 1818 0 0 1171 0 0 1262 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 17 19 23 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 577 803 425 473 Travel Time (s) 8.7 12.2 9.7 10.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 64 461 66 99 703 135 125 128 96 109 132 111 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 527 0 99 838 0 0 349 0 0 352 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 Total Split (s) 10.0 55.0 10.0 55.0 15.0 15.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 61.1 % 11.1 % 61.1 % 16.7% 16.7% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 3.2 48.2 3.2 48.2 8.6 8.6 18.6 18.6 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.4 6.4 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 43.1 40.7 43.1 40.7 19.2 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.50 0.53 0.50 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.57 0.25 0.91 1.20 1.11 Control Delay 13.8 16.4 8.2 33.4 148.4 117.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.8 16.4 8.2 33.4 148.4 117.3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2026 PM Pk Hr With Project 3: Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd 11/01/2021 --1' ' 4— 4\ I /P� ' Lane Group EBL EST EBP, VVBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS B B A C F F Approach Delay 16.2 30.8 148.4 117.3 Approach LOS B C F F Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 179 19 378 -250 •-238 Queue Length 95th (ft) 26 270 37 #635 #428 #416 Internal Link Dist (ft) 497 723 345 393 Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 255 Base Capacity (vph) 161 1127 390 1123 292 316 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.47 0.25 0.75 1.20 11 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 81 Natural Cycle:100 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:1.20 Intersection Signal Delay: 59.0 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Soffits and Phases: 3: Carson Rd & Lake Trafford Rd �i• MIN Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 174 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 246 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.43 4.45 - 22.61 2.13 Data Plot and Equation X 20,000 X 'y 15 000 / w X -o W ' X a H u H 10.000 ' ,X X X 5,000 X 3168 X 3a 00 500 1,000 1.500 2,700 2,500 3,000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.68 R'= 0.95 Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 192 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 226 Directional Distribution: 26% entering, 74% exiting venicie i rip veneration per uweiiing unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.70 0.27 - 2.27 0.24 Data Plot and Equation 2,000 1 500 0 w a 1,000 500 X X X X X XXr X ' X 2A M X 0 500 1,000 1,500 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.91 Ln(X) + 0.12 2,000 2,500 - - - - Average Rate R2= 0.90 Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition 9 Institute of Transportation Engineers 3.000 Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 208 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 248 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.94 Data Plot and Equation 2,500 2,000 v w a n 1,500 H 1,000 500 0 0.35 - 2.98 0.31 x X X X Xx X x 3 X X X x 31 X 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2.500 3,000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.94 Ln(X) + 0.27 R== 0.92 Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers WILLIAMS FARM PUD COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT III RKA. I IN Revised July 2022 Prepared For: JR Evans Engineering, P.A. 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 Estero, Florida 33928 (239) 405-9148 Prepared By: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 Project No. 16JRE2485 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Environmental Data Author...........................................................................................................1 VegetationDescriptions.................................................................................................................1 ListedSpecies Survey....................................................................................................................3 Native Vegetation Preservation.....................................................................................................3 References...................................................................................................................................... 5 i LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. FLUCFCS Codes and Acreages.............................................................................2 Table 2. On -Site Preserve Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages within Lake Trafford/ Camp Keais Strand Overlay...............................................4 Table 3. On -Site Preserve Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages Outsideof the Overlay...........................................................................................4 ii LIST OF EXHIBITS Page Exhibit 1. Project Location Map......................................................................................... El-1 Exhibit 2. Environmental Data Submittal Preparer's Resume...........................................E2-1 Exhibit 3. Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map........................................................E3-1 Exhibit 4. FLUCFCS Descriptions.....................................................................................E4-1 Exhibit 5. Listed Species Survey Report............................................................................E5-1 Exhibit 6. Native Vegetation Map...................................................................................... E6-1 Exhibit 7. On -Site Preserves Native and Non -Native Areas..............................................E7-1 lll INTRODUCTION The following environmental data report is provided in support of the zoning application for the proposed Williams Farms Planned Urban Development (PUD) (Project). The following information is being provided in accordance with the Collier County Environmental Data Submittal Requirements outlined in Section 3.08.00(A) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The Project totals 168.03± acres and is in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East and Section 36, Township 46 South, Range 28 East, Collier County (Exhibit 1). More specifically, it is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Lake Trafford Road and Little League Road, approximately 1.8f miles west of State Road 29 North (also known as North 15th Street). The Project is bordered by Lake Trafford Road to the north; the residential community of Arrowhead Reserve to the east; undeveloped, forested land to the south; single-family residences and Taylor Terrace to the west; and single-family residences and an electrical power plant to the northwest. The following environmental data report includes details regarding the author of this report, vegetation descriptions for the various habitats on -site, results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) in September 2021, and the Project's native vegetation preservation information. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AUTHOR This environmental data report was prepared by Michael Myers and Heather Samborski. They satisfy the environmental credential and experience requirements for preparing the report, per Section 3.08.00(A)2 of the Collier County LDC. Mr. Myers is a Senior Ecologist with PAI and has over 29 years of experience in the environmental consulting industry. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Michigan State University in Wildlife Biology and Management. His resume is attached as Exhibit 2. Mrs. Samborski is a Senior Ecologist with PAI and has over 7 years of experience in the environmental consulting industry. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Eastern Connecticut State University in Biology and a Master of Science degree from Florida Gulf Coast University in Environmental Science. Her resume is attached as Exhibit 2. VEGETATION DESCRIPTIONS The Project's existing land uses consist of a mixture of pastureland and undeveloped, forested upland and wetland habitat types with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The vegetation mapping of the subject property was initially conducted using Collier County 2016 and, more recently, December 2020 rectified color aerials (Scale: 1" = 200'). Groundtruthing to map the vegetative communities was first conducted on July 19, 2016 and later updated on September 15 and 16, 2021 utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) 1 Levels III and IV. Level IV FLUCFCS was utilized to denote hydrological conditions and disturbance. Exotic, or "E," codes were used to show levels of exotic species invasion (e.g., Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia)). AutoCAD Map 3D 2021 software was used to determine the acreage of each mapped polygon, produce summaries, and generate the final FLUCFCS map (Exhibit 3). A total of 30 vegetative associations and/or land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified on the property. The dominant habitat type is Improved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 211) (23.1 percent). Exotic vegetation documented on -site includes, but is not limited to, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca (Melalecua quinquenervia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), West Indian marsh grass (Hymenachne amplexicaulis), torpedograss (Panicum repens), caesarweed (Urena lobata), and Old World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum). The degree of exotic infestation ranges from 0 to 100 percent cover. The resulting acreages and FLUCFCS classifications are summarized in Table 1. Vegetation descriptions for each classification are provided as Exhibit 4. Table 1. FLUCFCS Codes and Acreages FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage Percent of Total 211 Improved Pasture 39.83 23.7 212 Unimproved Pasture 0.71 0.4 262 Low Pasture 6.13 3.6 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) 0.90 0.5 422 Brazilian Pepper 0.60 0.4 4279 E1 Live Oak, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) 0.40 0.2 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) 1.46 0.9 4279 E3 Live Oak, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 1.34 0.8 4279 E4 Live Oak, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) 0.59 0.4 4349 E2 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) 3.64 2.2 4349 E3 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 2.01 1.2 4349 E4 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) 2.94 1.7 510 Streams and Waterways 1.71 1.0 514 Ditch 2.65 1.6 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) 18.30 10.9 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) 1.32 0.8 6219 E4 Cypress, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) 0.23 0.1 6309 E1 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) 6.31 3.8 6309 E2 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) 25.67 15.3 6309 E3 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 3.11 1.9 6309 E4 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) 32.66 19.4 6419 E3 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 1.74 1.0 2 Table 1. (Continued) FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage Percent of Total 6419 E4 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) 0.15 0.1 6439 E4 Wet Prairies, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) 4.56 2.7 740 Disturbed Land 0.40 0.2 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 1.57 0.9 742 Borrow Area 0.42 0.2 743 Spoil Areas 1.09 0.6 832 Electrical Power Transmission Line 4.47 2.7 8321 Electrical Power Transmission Line, Hydric 1.12 0.7 Total 168.03 100.0 LISTED SPECIES SURVEY A listed plant and wildlife species survey was conducted by PAI for the Project site on September 15 and 16, 2021 in accordance with the requirements outlined in Section 3.08.00(A)4.b. of the LDC. Two listed wildlife species (i.e., crested caracara (Caracara cheriway) and little blue heron (Egretta caerulea)) were observed, along with Collier County protected plants. The Collier County Listed Species Survey Report for the Project is provided as Exhibit 5. NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVATION The 168.03± acre site contains 102.62± acres of native vegetation, as defined by the LDC (Exhibit 6). The Project boundary includes 96.73f acres located within the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand Overlay, identified on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. The remaining 71.30± acres are located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The proposed Project will remain consistent with the preservation standards outlined in the LDC (Section 3.05.07.B. I and Section 3.05.07.C.2) for developments located within the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand Overlay and Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Project will preserve a minimum of 60 percent of the site's native vegetation within the Lake Trafford Camp Keais Strand Overlay and 25 percent of the site's native vegetation outside of the Overlay, which equates to 55.87± acres (86.32± acres x 0.60 + 16.30± acres x 0.25). Table 2 provides a summary of the native vegetation communities on -site within the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand Overlay and the native vegetation preservation calculation. Table 3 provides a summary of the native vegetation communities outside of the Overlay and the native vegetation preservation calculation. Table 2. On -Site Preserve Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages Within Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand Overlay FLUCFCS Code Description Native Vegetation Acreage* Non -Native Vegetation Acreage 211 Improved Pasture - 0.77 262 Low Pasture - 0.48 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 0.03 - 4279 E1 Live Oak, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 0.40 - 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 0.20 - 4279 E4 Live Oak, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.38 - 4349 E2 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 2.22 - 4349 E3 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 0.63 - 4349 E4 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 1.00 - 510 Streams and Waterways - 1.10 514 Ditch - 1.62 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 18.01 - 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 1.32 - 6219 E4 Cypress, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.23 - 6309 E1 Mixed Wetland Forest 0-24% Exotics 5.67 - 6309 E2 Mixed Wetland Forest 25-49% Exotics 24.90 - 6309 E3 Mixed Wetland Forest 50-75% Exotics 1.26 - 6309 E4 Mixed Wetland Forest 76-100% Exotics 29.21 - 6419 E3 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 0.86 - 6419 E4 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics - 0.15 6439 E4 Wet Prairies, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics - 4.35 740 Disturbed Land - 0.40 743 Spoil Area - 0.01 832 Electrical Power Transmission Line - 0.65 8321 Electrical Power Transmission Line, H dric - 0.88 Total 86.32 10.41 *Minimum Retained Native Vegetation Requirement = 51.79 Acres (Native Vegetation Acreage 86.32 Acres x 60 Percent) Table 3. On -Site Preserve Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages Outside of the Overlay Native Non -Native FLUCFCS Description Vegetation Vegetation Code Acreage* Acreage 211 Improved Pasture - 39.06 212 Unimproved Pasture - 0.7 262 Low Pasture - 5.65 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics) 0.87 - M Table 3. (Continued) FLUCFCS Code Description Native Vegetation Acreage* Non -Native Vegetation Acreage 422 Brazilian Pepper - 0.60 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 1.26 - 4297 E3 Live Oak, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 1.34 - 4279 E4 Live Oak, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.21 - 4349 E2 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 1.42 - 4349 E3 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 1.38 - 4349 E4 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 1.94 - 510 Streams and Waterways - 0.61 514 Ditch - 1.03 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 0.29 - 6309 E1 Mixed Wetland Forest 0-24% Exotics 0.64 - 6309 E2 Mixed Wetland Forest 25-49% Exotics 0.77 - 6309 E3 Mixed Wetland Forest 50-75% Exotics 1.85 - 6309 E4 Mixed Wetland Forest 76-100% Exotics 3.45 - 6419 E3 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 0.88 - 6439 E4 Wet Prairies, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics - 0.21 7401 Disturbed Land, H dric - 1.57 742 Borrow Area - 0.42 743 Spoil Area - 1.08 832 Electrical Power Transmission Line - 3.82 8321 Electrical Power Transmission Line, H dric - 0.24 Total 16.30 55.00 *Minimum Retained Native Vegetation Requirement = 4.08Acres (Native Vegetation Acreage 16.30 Acres x 25 Percent) The Conceptual Master Plan identifies 70.68± acres of preserve area for the Project. The Conceptual Master Plan proposes to establish preserve areas along the eastern portion of the site and the southern portion of the site with the north/south Electrical Power Transmission Line (FLUCFCS Code 832) bisecting the preserve area (Exhibit 7). The intent of the preserve is to satisfy the Preservation Standards as outlined in Sections 3.05.07.4 and .5 of the LDC. All prohibited exotics will be removed from the preserve areas, and a management plan will be provided pursuant to approval of the Conceptual Site Plan. REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Second Edition. 5 EXHIBIT I PROJECT LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SUBMITTAL PREPARER'S RESUME Michael A. Myers Senior Vice President Senior Vice President for Passarella & Associates, Inc., an ecological consulting firm providing environmental and ecological services. Services include state, federal, and local permitting; agency negotiations; presentations for planning, zoning, and board of county commissioner hearings; environmental impact assessments; ecological assessments; listed species surveys, permitting and relocation; state and federal wetland jurisdictionals; wetland mitigation assessments, design, permitting and construction observations; wetland mitigation banking management, design, permitting and construction observations; and environmental project management. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE AVIATION Naples Municipal Airport, Collier County Pine Island Airpark, Lee County COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Freshman Daniels/Waterstone, Lee County Arborwood, Lee County Daniels Marketplace, Lee County Cypress Hammock, Lee County Hunter's Ridge Golf Course, Lee County Carefree Resort of Southwest Florida, Lee County Retreat Golf Course, Lee County Airport Technology Center, Lee County Verandah, Lee County Sun City, Lee County Hideout Golf Course, Collier County Glen Eden on the Bay, Collier County CONSERVATION BANKS Florida Panther Conservation Bank, Hendry County Florida Panther Conservation Bank II, Hendry County INSTITUTIONAL Collier County Public Schools, Collier County Golden Gate High School, Collier County Bethune Education Center, Collier County Florida Gulf Coast University, Lee County ROAD PROJECTS Bonita Beach Road, Lee County Bonita Beach Road Sections 4 and 5, Lee County WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS Bullfrog Bay Mitigation Bank, Polk County OTHER Cape Coral North 2 Utility Expansion Project, Lee County Bonita Springs Utilities Bonita Beach Road East Water Storage Tank, Lee County Bonita Springs Fire Station No. 4, Lee County U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Beautiful Pawpaw Monitoring and Reporting, Lee and Charlotte Counties Florida Department of Environmental Protection Cape Romano Acquisition Area, Collier County Lee County Emergency Operation Center, Lee County EXPERIENCE Senior Vice President and Senior Ecologist Passarella & Associates, Inc. (November 1996 - Present) Ecologist III, Environmental Field Supervisor Johnson Engineering, Inc. (September 1992 - November 1996) EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Wildlife Biology & Management 1980 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan CERTIFICATIONS Certified Wetland Delineator, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Certified to Perform Generic Gopher Tortoise Relocations by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Certified in Basic First Aid by the South Fort Myers Fire Department PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Florida Association of Environmental Professionals President of Southwest Florida Chapter (1996 - 1998) State Board of Directors (1996 - 1998) Local Board of Directors (1994- 1998) Florida Native Plant Society Society of Wetland Scientists Lee County Eagle Technical Advisory Committee (2007 - Present) PASSARELLA Cw�nsulxing SSOCIATES z Offices in Florida and South Carolina 13620 Metropolis Avenue • Suite 200 • Ft. Myers, FL 33912 401 North Cattlemen Road • Suite 102 • Sarasota, FL 34232 363 Wando Place Drive • Suite 200 • Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 www.passarella.net Heather Sa m borski Senior Ecologist Senior Ecologist for Passarella & Associates, Inc., an ecological consulting firm providing environmental and ecological services. Services include state, federal, and local permitting; agency negotiations; environmental impact assessments; ecological assessments; listed species surveys, permitting and relocation; state and federal wetland jurisdictionals; wetland mitigation design, permitting and construction observations; wetland mitigation banking management, design, permitting and construction observations; and environmental project management. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE AGRICULTURE Big Cypress Stewardship District, Collier County Shaggy Cypress Agricultural Development, Collier County Camp Keais Agricultural Development, Collier County AVIATION Southwest Florida International Airport, Lee County COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Rural Lands West, Collier County Cypress Walk, Lee County Premier Airport Park, Lee County Meridian Center, Lee County Argo Corkscrew Crossing, Lee County Argo Enclave Livingston, Collier County Skyplex Commercial Tract, Lee County Wildblue, Lee County Hacienda Lakes, Collier County Good Turn Center, Collier County Verdana, Lee County Siesta V, Lee County Willow Run, Collier County Cypress Walk, Lee County INSTITUTIONAL Collier County Public Schools, Collier County MINING Cemex Fort Myers Mine, Lee County OIL EXPLORATION Nobles Grade 3D Seismic Survey, Collier County WETLAND MITIGATION BANK Big Cypress Mitigation Bank, Collier County OTHER SSAs 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, Collier County GS-10 Preserve Land Management Plan, Lee County EXPERIENCE Senior Ecologist Passarella & Associates, Inc. (November 2020 - Present) Ecologist Passarella & Associates, Inc. (July 2014 - November 2020) Graduate Teaching Assistant Florida Gulf Coast University (August 2013 - January 2014) EDUCATION Master of Science, Environmental Science 2018 Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida Bachelor of Science, Biology 2011 Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, Connecticut PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Southwest Florida Chapter Newsletter Director (2014 - 2018) Vice President (2018 - 2019) Society of Wetland Scientists p ASSARELLA Consulging & A S S O C IAT E S z Ecolo fists Offices in Florida and South Carolina 13620 Metropolis Avenue • Suite 200 • Ft. Myers, FL 33912 1 401 North Cattlemen Road • Suite 102 • Sarasota, FL 34232 363 Wando Place Drive • Suite 200 • Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 www.passarella.net EXHIBIT 3 AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP x: F ; at'e�a r a* � - ra �" � A .ox' yI!,+ 4`�• 'a' � , a••. - • •� �/ �a' •'� ~ +: Y174 LEGEND: * F W WETLANDS (102.87 Ac.±) .± � I � �. l.� � �� �� � '_�v � � 3 � '�'' � .kale' � �•�, i Q ti , �I,., 4 r I � •� s, a<° ' . .ylk_*�,^• - �"�..-� ,�3 WATERS e-;N' - •.-1v r_..r�.�..- = ..'"' .sue -LAKE TRAFFORD RD-'70718 I � • ,. �' Iry � �F` •. � - FLUCFCS % OF 21 ` • A "' CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL 211 IMPROVED PASTURE 39.83 Ac._ 23.7% ' . �:' • `` y„ �• Iq1 / a • 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURE 0.71 Ac.± 0.4% 262 LOW PASTURE 6.13Ac.± 3.6% u r +S 4159 E2 PINE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 0.90 Ac.± 0.5% P 422 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 0.60 Ac.0.4% 1 �♦i• 1 ± ' r � , �i�' 4279 E1 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 0.40 Ac.± 0.2% 4349E41 1 • ••;' 4279 E2 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 1.46 Ac.± 0.9% 1 1 1, x sm + 4279 E3 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.34 Ac.± 0.8% rt • ar 4 0 1 1 • 4279 E4 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.59 Ac.± 0.4% 4349 E2 HARDWOOD/CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED 25-49% EXOTICS 3.64 Ac.± 2.2% .. y lr' o 1 1 4349 E3 HARDWOOD/CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 2.01 Ac.± 1.2% 4 .. - .. i+262; 1 4349 E4 HARDWOOD/CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 2.94 Ac.± 1.7% 7 1 1 1 510 STREAMS AND WATERWAYS 1.71 Ac.± 1.0% 514 DITCH 2.65 Ac.± 1.6% s`�' d /s i ' '"i �. _ _ �• 6219 E1 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 18.30 Ac.± 10.9% 211 6219 E2 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 1.32 Ac.± 0.8% • d� ': `'' o �F ��' t 1 6219 E4 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.23 Ac.± 0.1 6309 E1 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 6.31 Ac.± 3.8% it 832 6309 E2 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 25.67 Ac.± 15.3% A' 47 6309 E3 MIXED WETLAND FOREST DISTURBED 75% EXOTICS)311 1 9% Ilk- g F r 6309 E4 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 32.66 Ac.± 19.4% 1 6419 E3 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.74 Ac.± 1.0% as. -7401 - 6419 E4 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.15 Ac.± 0.1 ��� 6439 E4 WET PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 4.56 Ac.± 2.7% / ♦� ± ••'"/i'®'���//�����///� x 740 DISTURBED LAND 0.40 Ac.0.2% 8321 7401 DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 1.57 Ac.± 0.9% 1 • - / 742 BORROW AREA 0.42 Ac.± 0.2% / •, • 1• 1 II I 091 1• • /� 1 743 SPOILAREA 1.09Ac.± 0.6% 1 0.02 •• / 832 ELECTRICAL POWER TRANSMISSION LINE 4.47 Ac.± 2.7% 1 r I I II II II 8321 ELECTRICAL POWER TRANSMISSION LINE, HYDRIC 1.12 Ac.± 0.7% • 1 • II II 1 • I / TOTAL 168.03 Ac.± 100.0% 1 0 I. 1 262 • 1• 15 2 Ac. 1� .... •�•'•„• �� 8321 11: Ac. 1 1• (0 1 �� 1• ".1�. 1 1 �•� . 1 �� ♦� 1� I IIII � I °a •�� 1 . 1 1••. 1 1 1 1 A �w .�i 1� • ��� 1 1 NOTES: • 1,•. '//j / 1 1 1, *, 1 J AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH • 1• 1 �� 1• THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2020. 8321 0 , 09 PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER J.R. EVANS, DRAWING 1 %IN 1 • ; . • c No. WILLIAMS FARMS MCP REV2.DWG DATED JUNE 1 • I 11 1 • 28, 2022. 1 •:. •• 1 • 1 % 1 k FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1'=200' AERIAL • 1. 1 % 1. (0.23 1 PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND a' FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) • 1 • 1 • iT (FDOT 1999). UPLAND/WETLAND LIMITS HAVE NOT BEEN y 1 . REVIEWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY AND r «_, ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. _ Y REVISIONS DATE DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING N.. T.S., R.F. 10/21/21 13620 Metropolis Avenue Updated Boundary 07/01/22 DESIGNEDBY DATE Suite 200 PASSARELLA WILLIAMS FARM PUD 16JxEz4a5 d H.S. 10/21/21 Ft. Myers, FL 33912 SHEETN.. REVIEWED BY DATE Phone (239) 274-0067 E osis� AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP H.S. 10/21/21 Fax (239) 274.0069 & S S O CIATE S uz EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4 FLUCFCS DESCRIPTIONS WILLIAMS FARM PUD FLUCFCS DESCRIPTIONS November 2024 The following Table 1 summarizes the habitat types by Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) codes and provides an acreage breakdown of the habitat types found on the property. A description of the vegetative composition within each FLUCFCS code follows. Table 1. FLUCFCS Codes and Acreages FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage Percent Of Total 211 Improved Pasture 39.84 23.7 212 Unimproved Pasture 0.71 0.4 262 Low Pasture 6.13 3.6 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 0.90 0.5 422 Brazilian Pepper 0.60 0.4 4279 E1 Live Oak, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 0.40 0.2 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 1.46 0.8 4279 E3 Live Oak, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 1.34 0.8 4279 E4 Live Oak, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.59 0.4 4349 E2 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 3.64 2.2 4349 E3 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 2.01 1.2 4349 E4 Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 2.94 1.7 510 Streams and Waterways 1.71 1.0 514 Ditch 2.65 1.6 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 18.30 10.9 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 1.32 0.8 6219 E4 Cypress, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.23 0.1 6309 E1 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 6.31 3.8 6309 E2 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 25.67 15.3 6309 E3 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics) 3.11 1.9 6309 E4 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 32.66 19.4 6419 E3 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 1.74 1.0 6419 E4 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.15 0.1 6439 E4 Wet Prairies, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 4.56 2.7 740 Disturbed Land 0.40 0.2 7401 Disturbed Land, H dric 1.57 0.9 742 Borrow Area 0.42 0.2 E4-1 Table 1. (Continued) FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage Percent Of Total 743 Spoil Areas 1.09 0.6 832 Electrical Power Transmission Line 4.47 2.7 8321 Electrical Power Transmission Line, H dric 1.12 0.7 Total 168.03 100.0 Improved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 211) These areas are maintained and utilized for cattle grazing. The canopy and sub -canopy are mostly open with scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), live oak (Quercus virginiana), and Florida strangler fig (Ficus aurea). The ground cover includes smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus), bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), spermacoce (Spermacoce verticillata), yellow nutgrass (Cyperus esculentus), crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), Mexican clover (Richardia brasiliensis), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), beggarticks (Bidens alba), partridge pea (Chamaecrista fasciculata), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), shortleaf spikesedge (Cyperus brevifolius), and scattered knotroot foxtail (Setaria parviflora) and water pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata). Unimproved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212) The vegetative composition of this land use type is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 211 except for the presence of caesarweed (Urena lobata) and dog fennel (Eupatorium capilifolium) within the ground cover. Low Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 262) The canopy and sub -canopy are open. The ground cover consists of torpedograss (Panicum repens), West Indian marsh grass (Hymenachne amplexicaulis), water pennywort, paragrass (Urochola mutica), flatsedge (Cyperus haspan), carpetweed (Phyla nodiflora), bushy bluestem (Andropogon glomeratus), shortleaf spikesedge, knotroot foxtail, maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), and scattered pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), pale meadowbeauty (Rhexia mariana), and arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia subsp. lancifolia). Pine, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4159 E2) The canopy of this upland habitat type contains slash pine (Pious elliottii). The sub -canopy contains slash pine, Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), and cabbage palm. The ground cover is mostly open with scattered caesarweed and wiregrass (Aristida stricta). Brazilian Pepper (FLUCFCS Code 422) The canopy is open. The sub -canopy is dominated by Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is mostly open with scattered Brazilian pepper and caesarweed. Live Oak, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4279 E1) The canopy of this upland habitat type consists of live oak and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy contains live oak, cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper, cassia (Senna pendula), and java plum (Syzygium cumini). The ground cover contains caesarweed, smutgrass, beggarticks, bahiagrass, and limpograss (Hemarthria altissima). E4-2 Live Oak, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4279 E2) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 4279 E1 except with 25 to 49 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Live Oak, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4279 E3) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 4279 E2 except with 50 to 75 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Live Oak, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4279 E4) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 4279 E3 except with 75 to 100 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4349 E2) The canopy consists of a mixture of slash pine and live oak, with scattered cabbage palm. The sub - canopy contains Brazilian pepper and cabbage palm. The ground cover includes caesarweed, smutgrass, greenbrier (Smilax spp.), and broomsedge. Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4349 E3) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 4349 E2 except with 50 to 75 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4349 E4) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 4349 E3 except with 76 to 100 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Streams and Waterways (FLUCFCS Code 510) The canopy of this natural surface water feature is open. The sub -canopy is mostly open with willow (Salix caroliniana), Peruvian primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), and Brazilian pepper along the edges. The ground cover is mostly open with some water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), fireflag (Thalia geniculata), and duckweed (Lemna sp.). Ditch (FLUCFCS Code 514) The canopy of this surface water feature is open. The sub -canopy is mostly open with willow, Peruvian primrose willow, and Brazilian pepper along the edges. The ground cover is mostly open with some swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum), dotted smartweed (Persicaria punctatum), duckweed, and water lettuce. Cypress, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219 El) The canopy of this wetland habitat type consists of cypress (Taxodium distichum) and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy contains cypress, cabbage palm, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover contains swamp fern, climbing fern (Lygodium sp.), fireflag, chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), and West Indian marsh grass. Cypress, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219 E2) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 6219 E1 except with 25 to 49 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. E4-3 Cypress, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics)(FLUCFCS Code 6219 E4) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 6219 E2 except with 76 to 100 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Mixed Wetland Forest Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6309 E1) The canopy consists of a mixture of red maple (Acer rubrum), cypress, Florida strangler fig, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and scattered java plum. The sub -canopy contains the same species as the canopy, as well as Peruvian primrose willow, willow, Brazilian pepper, and pond apple (Annona glabra). The ground cover contains swamp fern, chain fern, climbing fern, greenbrier, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), Asiatic pennywort (Centella asiatica), water pennywort, fireflag, West Indian marsh grass, maidencane, inundated beaksedge (Rhynchospora inundata), and swamp sunflower (Helianthus angustifolius). Mixed Wetland Forest Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E2 The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 6309 E1 except with 25 to 49 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Mixed Wetland Forest Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6309 E3) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 6309 E2 except with 50 to 75 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Mixed Wetland Forest Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E4 The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 6309 E3 except with 76 to 100 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6419 E2) The canopy is open. The sub -canopy is mostly open with scattered willow and Peruvian primrose willow. The ground cover is dominated by fireflag and also contains scattered sawgrass and West Indian marsh grass. Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6419 E3) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 6419 E2 except with 50 to 75 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6419 E4) The vegetative composition is similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 6419 E3 except with 76 to 100 percent coverage by exotic vegetation. Wet Prairies, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6439 E4) The canopy of this wetland habitat type is open. The sub -canopy is mostly open with scattered Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is dominated by paragrass and also includes torpedograss and West Indian marsh grass. E4-4 Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740) The canopy is open. The sub -canopy contains Brazilian pepper along the edge. The ground cover contains bushy bluestem, smutgrass, beggarticks, carpetweed, yellow nutgrass, and white -top sedge (Rhynchospora colorata). Disturbed Land, H, d�FLUCFCS Code 7401) The canopy is open. The sub -canopy contains cabbage palm and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover contains paragrass, caesarweed, beggarticks, spermacoce, fennel (Eupatorium leptophyllum), Asiatic pennywort, and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia). Borrow Area (FLUCFCS Code 742) The canopy of this excavated surface water feature is open. The sub -canopy is mostly open with Brazilian pepper along the edge. The ground cover is primarily open with some cattail (Typha sp.) and water lettuce. Spoil Areas (FLUCFCS Code 743) This upland feature was formed from the deposit of material excavated to construct an adjacent ditch. The canopy contains cabbage palm and live oak. The sub -canopy consists of Brazilian pepper cabbage palm, and Florida strangler fig. The ground cover contains sparse caesarweed and smutgrass. Electrical Power Transmission Line (FLUCFCS Code 832) This land use category designates a Florida Power and Light right-of-way that bisects the property. The canopy and sub -canopy of this land use type are open. The ground cover contains smutgrass, bahiagrass, broomsedge, dog fennel, caesarweed, beggarticks, partridge pea, and fingergrass (Eustachys petraea). Electrical Power Transmission Line, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 8321) The canopy is open. The sub -canopy is mainly open with some willow and Peruvian primrose willow. The ground cover contains fireflag, paragrass, maidencane, West Indian marsh grass, climbing fern, swamp fern, chain ferm, cattail, water lettuce, and California bulrush (Schoenoplectus californicus). E4-5 EXHIBIT 5 LISTED SPECIES SURVEY REPORT WILLIAMS FARM PUD LISTED SPECIES SURVEY REPORT November 2021 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. for Williams Farm PUD (Project). The purpose of the survey was to review the Project area for plant and wildlife species listed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, species of special concern, or commercially exploited. The Project totals 168.03± acres and is located in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East and Section 36, Township 46 South, Range 28 East, Collier County (Figure 1). More specifically, the Project site is on the south side of County Road 890 (CR 890), approximately 17.8± miles east of Interstate 75. The site consists primarily of mixed wetland forest and improved pasture. The surrounding land uses include single family homes to the North, East, West, and undeveloped forested lands to the South. METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS The listed plant and wildlife species survey included an on -site review conducted on September 15 and 16, 2021 and a literature search for local, state, and federally listed species. Literature Review The literature search involved an examination of available information on protected species in the Project's geographical region. The literature sources reviewed included the FWCC's Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (2021); Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991); USFWS Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region (1987); the Landscape Conservation Strategy Map (Kautz et al. 2006); and the USFWS and/or the FWCC databases for telemetry locations of the Florida panther (Puma concolor corgi), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), crested caracara (Caracara cheriway), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), and wading bird rookeries, such as the wood stork (Mycteria americana), in Collier County. The wildlife agencies' database information is updated on a periodic basis and is current through different dates, depending on the species. The FWCC information is current through the noted dates for the following species: bald eagle nest locations — September 2021 (acquired); crested caracara — September 2021 (acquired); Florida scrub jay — September 2021 (acquired); wading bird rookeries — 1999; Florida black bear — 2007; and Florida panther — June 2021. E5-1 The closest documented bald eagle nesting area (Nesting Area 134) is located approximately 0.72 mile northwest of the Project (Figure 2). No bald eagles were heard or observed during the listed species survey, and no bald eagle nests were identified within the Project limits. The bald eagle nest database is current through the 2021 nesting season. The nest distance is beyond the USFWS' and the FWCC's recommended 660-foot buffer protection zone for active and alternate bald eagle nests. The bald eagle is not a listed species, but is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991) was referenced for the location of breeding colonies of both listed and non -listed wading birds including, but not limited to, snowy egret (Egretta thula), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), wood stork, and tri-colored heron (Egretta tricolor). There was no reference to breeding rookeries located on the Project. The FWCC database for wading bird rookeries shows the closest wading bird locations approximately 1.75 miles southeast of the property (Figure 2). Two little blue herons were observed on the Project during the listed species survey. The FWCC database for the crested caracara locations shows that the closest caracara location is approximately 1± mile southeast of the Project site (Figure 2). Four adult crested caracaras were observed on the Project during the listed species survey. The Project lies within the USFWS' consultation area for the crested caracara (Figure 3). The caracara is listed as threatened by the USFWS and the FWCC. The FWCC database for Florida scrub jay locations shows that the closest scrub jay location is 0.25± mile north of the Project site (Figure 2). The Project lies within the USFWS' Florida scrub jay consultation area (Figure 4). However, the Project site does not contain suitable scrub habitat such as scrub oak (Quercus inopina), myrtle oak (Q. myrtifolia), Chapman oak (Q. chapmanii), sand live oak (Q. geminata), or sand pine (Pinus clausa) that may be used by scrub jays. No Florida scrub jays or their sign were documented on the Project during the listed species survey. The Florida scrub jay is listed as threatened by the USFWS and federally threatened by the FWCC. The Project lies within the USFWS' consultation area, but outside the critical habitat area, for the Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus) (Figure 5). The Everglade snail kite is listed as endangered by the FWCC and the USFWS. The FWCC database for snail kite locations shows that the closest snail kite nest location is approximately 16 miles northwest of the Project site (Figure 5). No snail kites or their sign were documented on the Project during the listed species survey. The Project lies within the USFWS consultation area, but outside the proposed critical habitat area for the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) (Figure 6). The Florida bonneted bat is listed as endangered by the FWCC and the USFWS. No Florida bonneted bats were observed on the Project during the listed species survey. The FWCC database shows no Florida black bear telemetry on the Project site. According to the FWCC database, the nearest Florida black bear telemetry location is documented approximately E5-2 five miles southwest of the Project site (Figure 2). Although the Florida black bear has been delisted by the FWCC, it is still protected under the Bear Conservation Rule (Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) 68A-4.009). No Florida black bears, or their sign (i.e., scat, scratch trees, tracks) were observed during the listed species survey. The FWCC database shows no Florida panther telemetry points on the Project site. The nearest Florida panther telemetry point is located approximately 0.75 mile southwest of the site (Figure 2). The Project site is located partially within the USFWS' Florida panther focus area within the primary zone (Figure 7). The Florida panther is listed as endangered by the USFWS and FWCC. A Florida panther sign (scratch tree) was documented on a bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) during the listed species survey. There are five plant species listed on the Less Rare Plant list per Collier County's Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.04.03 (Requirements for Protected Plants) that could occur within habitats on the Project site. They include the butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis), giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata), Northern needleleaf (T. balbisiana), stiff -leaved wild pine (T. fasciculata), and twisted air plant (T. flexuosa). The cardinal airplant and giant airplant are listed as endangered by the FDACS and designated a "less rare" species per Collier County LDC (Section 3.04.03). The Northern needleleaf is listed as threatened by the FDACS and also designated a "less rare" species per Collier County LDC (Section 3.04.03). The butterfly orchid, is listed as commercially exploited by the FDACS and designated a "less rare" species per Collier County LDC (Section 3.04.03). Field Survey The property was surveyed on September 15 and 16, 2021 for wildlife species listed by the FWCC as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern and by the USFWS as endangered or threatened. The property was also surveyed for plant species listed by the FDACS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited. In addition, the property was surveyed for the bald eagle and/or their nests since they are protected under Florida Administrative Code 68A- 16.002, the MBTA, and the BGEPA. The field surveys were conducted by qualified ecologists walking meandering transects spaced approximately 50 to 100 feet apart. The approximate locations of the survey transects are depicted on Figure 8. The site was inspected for listed plant and wildlife species as well as their signs (e.g., burrows, tracks, scat, scratches, etc.). At regular intervals the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The weather during the survey was seasonal, with temperatures in the mid-70s to low 90s, partly cloudy skies, and winds ranging from 0 to 10 miles per hour. The surveys began around 8:00 a.m. and ended at approximately 16:00 p.m. A total of three listed wildlife species or their sign on the property during the September 2021 field surveys. Observed species include two foraging little blue herons, four foraging adult crested caracara, and one Florida panther scratch tree. Additionally, one listed plant species E5-3 (butterfly orchid) was documented. Approximate locations of listed wildlife and plant species observed are shown on an aerial provided as Figure 8. SUMMARY The literature review for the Project revealed that no bald eagle nests have been documented within the property limits. While the Project contains suitable red -cockaded woodpecker habitat, no red -cockaded woodpecker colonies or cavities in live pines are located on the Project according to the FWCC database. No historical reference to wading bird rookeries on the Project site was found, and the FWCC database does not show wading bird rookeries as being located within the Project limits. No Florida scrub jay, Florida black bear, or Florida panther locations were documented on the Project by the FWCC database. Field surveys for listed species were conducted by PAI on September 15 and 16, 2021. Three listed wildlife species or their sign and one listed plant species were documented during the field surveys: Florida panther sign, crested caracara, little blue heron, and butterfly orchid. REFERENCES Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2021. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. Official Lists, Bureau of Non -Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 118-133 Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986-1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region. E5-4 FIGURE I PROJECT LOCATION MAP - ~ j- - --5.�, HEND-RR - -. , COLLIE - - - - i Sp TINAS LN --� cn n' �.. h �W LLI - IU _PROJECT LOCATION . ' *STTO- �v LAKE TRAFFORD RD I� qL 2Ix ,.........�� `- IMMOKALEE�DR rcr , �, _ w wwAIN ST EM, AI V ` , -- _"----CR- 846 - — — — x -7. W. 6 I y i. _. I- �...... IMM_OKAL-EER D i -.. ... AND AVE NE w — 70TH AVE NE—:C: .; I � �II -� w ' T:RD a 68TH AVE NE c-� 66TH AVE NE F t� Q ..,� -64TH AVE NE }. v y U .62ND AVE NE - - -- ' ''':60THAVE �NE ��. .... i.: FIGURE 2 DOCUMENTED OCCURRENCES OF LISTED SPECIES I ,f. i♦ HENDRY ' _ •' ®®--- =• •—•�— LEGEND ------------— -- 82 � �. I • I ' • � • � IE� � • • I • • •t,•• i ; •• f /yam ® ixyy I<•'t • • • , • ,• .t�• •••, of o. LEE +0 .t. CORKSCREW RD w • •i I • • PER VD • • w • • {-T • t •.• �,••• • • AFT •� •it• • • ~ •• • Ao ..o o•. �% • oo o • • • t • .t=• ti • ♦ • • ® 29 • .;• i•! Miles •... t ._' • "• PROJECT LOCATION . ; . . , . s .a • • • , : ,• •• . 1 COLLIER . 49 - - - - - 846 O O . . . ❑ • • M ■ � •' • ¢ • t�. • ; a0 GL y . •;• • ♦ W ® • • • t.. . • . i •t ot DRAWN BY DATE R.F. 10/05/21 FIGURE 2. DOCUMENTED OCCURRENCES OF LISTED SPECIES PASSARELLA REVIEWED BY DATE WILLIAMS FARM PUD M.M.0/0 �.�n;u'�,n� & fAlOg18� U ASSOCIATES REVISEDVISED DATE ATE FIGURE 3 CRESTED CARACARA CONSULTATION AREA WITH LOCATIONS FIGURE 4 SCRUB JAY CONSULTATION AREA WITH LOCATIONS Gulf of Mexico LEGEND s ...:. c._... .. FIGURE 4. SCRUB JAY CONSULTATION AREA WITH LOCATIONS WILLIAMS FARM PUD i COLLIER 1 `4 I 1 I 1 � II 1 MONROE R.F. 10/06/21 REVIEWED BY DATE PASSARELLA M.M. 10/06/21 77=111.� [^ REVISED DATE-��w�o��1e ASSOCIATES 2 FIGURE 5 SNAIL KITE CONSULTATION AREA WITH CRITICAL HABITAT AREAS AND NEST LOCATIONS i DESOTO 0 I HIGHLANDS � f CHARLOTTE i s �y r L E � GLAD 7 / _A is—, 77- -77-- f+, I HENDRY PROJECT LOCATION Gulf ` of Mexico f 1 Gr_Gun L,_._ ---- Lake Okeechobee M O N R O E — ` - DRAWN BY DATE FIGURE 5. SNAIL KITE CONSULTATION AREA WITH R.F. 10/06/21 REVIEWED BY DATE PASSARELLA CRITICAL HABITAT AREAS AND NEST LOCATIONS M.M. 10/06/21 ��„� WILLIAMS FARM PUD REVISED °ATE ASSOCIATES 2 '�C FIGURE 6 FLORIDA BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION AREA AND PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT MAP FIGURE 7 PANTHER ZONES WITH PANTHER FOCUS AREA PROJECT LOCATION LEGEND e. ra r T w E S 2 Miles R.F. 10/06/21 FIGURE 7. PANTHER ZONES WITH PANTHER FOCUS AREA REVIEWEDEY DATE WILLIAMS FARM PUD M.M. 1 DITE 1 EVI RSED DATE '60,PASSARELLA ASSOCIATES FIGURE 8 AERIAL WITH SURVEY TRANSECTS AND LISTED SPECIES LOCATIONS MAP Utz :r ar f Fm k . — -LAKE TRAFFORD RD- - s•~ �' ILI n ` O �h ' ✓� _ Z � Iv 4 DATE DKAWN BY T.S., R.F. DAIS 10/22/21 13620 Metropolis Avenue DESIGNED BY DATE Suite 200 H.S. 10/22/21 Ft. Myers, FL 33912 REVIEWED BY DATE Phone (239) 274.0067 H.S. 10/22/21 Fax (239) 274-0069 jWTASSARELLA S S & cO clA T E S T T c EcdoBisrs L __ ,;= , • _ - - - 40 - a LEGEND: _ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF t� WALKED TRANSECTS 4' O CRCA CRESTED CARACARA O ENC TAM ENCYCLIA TAMPENSIS .►•. O LBHE LITTLE BLUE HERON O PANT ST PANTHER SCRATCH TREE a4, ,r T NOTES: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2020. .;, PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER DAGOSTINO GEOSPATIAL INC, DRAWING No. 21307 BONUDARY 10-20-21.DWG DATED OCTOBER 21, 2021. DRAWING No. WILLS FARM PUD 16JRE2485 AERIAL WITH SURVEY TRANSECTS AND LISTED SPECIES SHEET No. LOCATIONS MAP FIGURE 8 EXHIBIT 6 NATIVE VEGETATION MAP OVERLAY OVERLAY LEGEND: NOTES: FLUCFCS NATIVE NON-NATIVE NATIVE NON-NATIVE CODE VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION TOTAL W WETLANDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER J.R. EVANS, DRAWING 211 = 39.06Ao.+ - 0.77Ac.± 39,83Ac.± (102.87 Ac.±) No. WILLIAMS FARMS MCP REV2.DWG DATED JUNE 28, 2022. A,.,,212 0.71 Ac.± 071 Ac.±28, 2022. El\WATERS • ` 262 5.65 Ac.0.48 Ac,± 6.13 Ac.± (4.36 Ac.±) LAKE TRAFFORD/CAMP KEAIS WETLAND 4159E2 0.87Ac.± 0.03Ac.± 0.90Ac.± OVERLAY PER COLLIER COUNTY DRAWING No. `// F7 NATIVE VEGETATION IMMOKALEEWETLANDS.SHP DATED OCTOBER 28, 422 D.60Ac.± 0.60Ac.± (16.30 Ac.±) 2021. SCALE: 1" = 400' 4279El 0.40Ac.± 0.40Ac.± NON-NATIVE VEGETATION FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1'=200' AERIAL 4279E2 1.26Ac.± 020Ac.± 1.46Ac.± F7 (55.00 Ac.±) PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. 4279E3 1.34Ac.± 1.34Ac.± 4279 E4 0.21 Ac. t 0.38 Ac. -t 0.59 Ac.± OVERLAY NATIVE VEGETATION FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND 4349E2 1.42Ac.t 222Ac.± - 3.64Ac. ± F-1 (86.32 Ac.±) FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) 4349E3 1.38Ac. t 0.63Ac.t 2.01Ac.± (FOOT 1999). OVERLAY NON-NATIVE 4349E4 1.94Ac.± 1.00Ac.± 2.94Ac.t VEGETATION (10.41 Ac.±) UPLAND/WETLAND LIMITS HAVE NOT BEEN n 510 0.61 Ac.± 1.10Ac.± 1.71 Ac.- REVIEWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY AND c WETLANDS CONNECTED TO LAKE ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. A 514 1.03Ac. ± 1.62Ac. ± 2.65Ac. ± TRAFFORD/CAMP KEAIS STRAND o 6219E1 0.29Ac. t 18.01 Ac.- 18.30Ac. t OVERLAY LINE z 6219E2 1.32Ac. t 1.32Ac.t 0 6219 E4 023 Ac. t 023 Ac.t 6309 El 0.64 Ac. t 5.67 Ac. t 6.31 Ac. t 6309 E2 0.77 Ac. t 24.90 Ac.- 25.67 Ac.t 63D9 E3 1.85 Ac. t 126 Ac. t 3.11 Ac.t -MIRAHAM DR- 6309 E4 3.45Ac. t 29.21 Ac.- 32.66Ac. t 6419 E3 0.88 Ac. t 0.86 Ac. t 1.74 Ac. t 6419E4 0.15Ac.t 0.15Ac.t 6439 E4 0.21 Ac.t 4.35Ac.t 4.56Ac. t P/L 740 0.40Ac. t 0.40Ac. t 7401 1.57 Ac. t 1.57 Ac.t WWWWWWWWWWWW 742 0.42Ac. t 0.42Ac. t W W W W 743 1.08 Ac. t 0.01 Ac.- 1.09 Ac.t $32 3.82 Ac. t 0.65 Ac.- 4.47 Ac.t 8321 - 0.24 Ac. t 0,88 Ac.- 1.12 Ac.t TOTAL 16.30 Ac. t 55.00 Ac.- 86.32 Ac.t 10.41 Ac.- 168.03 Ac.t I REVISIONS DATE DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING No. R.F. 11/01/21 13620 Metropolis Avenue Updated Boundary 07/01/22 DESIGNED BY DATE Suite 200 PASSARELLA WILLIAMS FARM PUD 16IREz485 H.S. 11/01/21 Ft. Myers, FL 33912 SHEET No. Phone (239) 274.0067 _ /� 4 NATIVE VEGETATION MAP REVIEWED BY DATE Iy & ASSOCIATES ,TE+S z EXHIBIT H.S. 11/01/21 Fax (239) 274.0069 EXHIBIT 7 ON -SITE PRESERVES NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE AREAS ?.O�n Ao� SCALE: 1" = -LAKE TRAFFORD RD- LEGEND: AREA ®PRESERVE (70.68 Ac.±) F-1 NATIVE VEGETATION (63.32 Ac.±) NON-NATIVE VEGETATION (7.36 Ac.±) NOTES: PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND SITE PLAN PER J.R. EVANS, DRAWING No. WILLIAMS FARMS MCP REV2.DWG DATED JUNE 28, 2022. UPLAND/WETLAND LIMITS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. REVISIONS DATE DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING No. P.F. 10/25/21 13620 Metropolis Avenue Updated Boundary & Site Plan 07/01/22 DESIGNEDBY DATE Suite 200 PASSARELLA WILLIAMS FARM PUD 16IRE2485 H.S. 10/25/21 Ft. Myers, FL 33912 SHEET No. REVIEWED BY DATE Phone (239) 274.0067 _�_ SS�CIATES z ON -SITE PRESERVE NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE AREAS EXHIBIT 7 H.S. 10/25/21 Fax (239) 274,0069 WILLIAMS FARM PUD UMORAFI AM SUMMARY July 2022 Table 1. Wetland Impacts Assessment Area ID Existing FLUCFCS Code(s) Current Location Current Water Environment CurrentScore/ Community Structure Delta Impact Acreage Functional Units Lost l 262 7.00 6.00 2.00 0.50 5.36 2.68 2 6219 E1 7.00 6.00 7.00 0.67 0.39 0.26 3 6309 E2 7.00 6.00 6.00 0.63 17.44 11.05 4 6309 E3, 6419 E3 7.00 6.00 5.00 0.60 2.72 1.63 5 6309 E4, 6439 E4 7.00 6.00 4.00 0.57 13.60 7.71 6 7401 7.00 6.00 2.00 0.50 1.57 0.79 7 8321 7.00 6.00 2.00 0.50 0.32 0.16 Wetland Impact Totals 41.40 24.27 Passarella & Associates, Inc. #16JRE2485 Page 1 of 1 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF WILLIAMS FARMS PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT (PUD), COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for: J.R. Evans Engineering 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 201 Estero, Florida 33928 Prepared by: Ina Florida's First Choice in Cultural Resource Management Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 (941) 379-6206 March 2022 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF WILLIAMS FARMS PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT (PUD), COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for: J.R. Evans Engineering 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 201 Estero, Florida 33928 I: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Maranda Kles - Project Manager Jean Lammie - Project Archaeologist Justin Winkler - Archaeologist March 2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) conducted a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) of the 168-acre Williams Farms Planned Urban Development (PUD) in Collier County, Florida for J.R. Evans Engineering, LLC. The property is located on the south side of Lake Trafford Road, less than one kilometer (km) from the eastern shore of Lake Trafford. The project will involve construction of a residential planned urban development. The survey, completed in February 2022, was conducted at the request of the Collier County Zoning Department in anticipation of permitting. The purpose of this investigation was to locate and identify any cultural resources within the project Area of Potential Effects (APE) and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). As defined in 36 CFR Part § 800.16(d), the APE is the "geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist." Based on the scale and nature of the activities, the project has a limited potential for any indirect (visual or audible) or cumulative effects outside the immediate footprint of construction. Therefore, because of the project type and location of the proposed work, the archaeological and historical APE are limited to the existing boundaries of the project. All work was carried out in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-655, as amended), as implemented by 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties, effective August 2004), as well as Chapters 267 and 373, Florida Statutes (FS), Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code, and the Florida Coastal Management Program. All work was performed in accordance with the standards and guidelines contained in the Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual: Module 3 (FDHR 2003). The Principal Investigators meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (48 FR 44716) for archaeology, history, architecture, architectural history, or historic architecture. Background research indicated that there are two archaeological sites within the APE 8CR00725 (Buried Tin) and 8CR000704 (Williams Site 2). Neither of these sites have been evaluated by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) for listing in the NRHP. There are four additional sites within one mile of the APE. Based on the environmental setting the APE was considered to have moderate aboriginal archaeological potential. None of the soils have a significant correlation with sites, but there are water sources available and numerous pre -Contact habitation and burial sites within 1.6 kilometers (1 mile). There is a moderate potential for a historic site as there was a residence on the tract since at least 1941, but it is no longer extant. The investigations, which included the excavation of 81 shovel tests, found no evidence of the two previously recorded precontact sites, nor any evidence of other (precontact or historic) sites within the APE. Historical background research, including a review of the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) and NRHP, indicated that no historic resources are located within or adjacent to the APE. The Collier County property appraiser data indicated no historic structures within the APE, and none were evident on the aerial photos of the area (Skinner 2022; USDA 1944, 1958, 1963, 1980). The field investigations confirmed the absence of historic resources within the APE. Based on the background research and survey results, including the excavation of 81 shovel tests on this 168-acre parcel, no evidence of the previously recorded sites was encountered; therefore, no revisions were made to the existing site file forms. No evidence of new sites or historical resources was recovered. It is the opinion of ACI that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on any cultural resources that are listed, determined eligible, or that appear potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.........................................................................................2-1 2.1 Location and Setting..................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Geology and Geomorphology...................................................................................2-1 2.3 Soils and Vegetation..................................................................................................2-3 2.4 Paleoenvironmental Considerations..........................................................................2-3 3.0 CULTURE HISTORY.........................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Paleoindian................................................................................................................3-2 3.2 Archaic......................................................................................................................3-3 3.3 Formative..................................................................................................................3-4 3.4 Ten Thousand Islands................................................................................................3-6 3.5 Colonialism...............................................................................................................3-6 3.6 Territorial and Statehood...........................................................................................3-7 3.7 Civil War and Aftermath...........................................................................................3-9 3.8 Twentieth Century...................................................................................................3-11 3.9 APE Specifics..........................................................................................................3-12 4.0 RESEARCH CONSIDERATIONS AND METHODS .....................................................4-1 4.1 Background Research and Literature Review...........................................................4-1 4.2 Archaeological Considerations..................................................................................4-1 4.3 Historic/Architectural Considerations.......................................................................4-5 4.4 Field Methodology....................................................................................................4-6 4.5 Unexpected Discoveries............................................................................................4-6 4.6 Laboratory Methods/Curation...................................................................................4-7 5.0 SURVEY RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................5-1 5.1 Archaeological Results..............................................................................................5-1 5.2 Historical Results......................................................................................................5-3 5.3 Conclusions............................................................................................................... 5-3 6.0 REFERENCES CITED.......................................................................................................6-1 APPENDIX A: Survey Log m LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND PHOTOGRAPHS Figure Figure 1.1. Location of the Williams Farms PUD APE . .................................................................. 1-2 Figure 2.1. Environmental setting of the APE..................................................................................2-2 Figure 3.1 Florida Archaeological Regions with APE marked....................................................... 3-1 Figure 3.2. 1873 plat showing the APE............................................................................................3-9 Figure 3.3. 1958 quad map showing the APE................................................................................ 3-13 Figure 3.4. Historic Ives Map of Peninsular Florida showing locations of Seminole War forts andSeminole camps.....................................................................................................3-14 Figure 3.5. 1930 Nash survey of historic Seminole Camps in the Big Cypress Swamp . ............... 3-15 Figure 3.6. 1953 and 1980 aerials of the APE showing a stream and unimproved construction areawithin the APE..................................................................................................... 3-16 Figure 4.1. Previously recorded archaeological site within one mile of the APE ............................ 4-3 Figure 5.1. Location of shovel tests and archaeological sites within the APE . ................................ 5-2 Table Table 2.1. Soil types within the APE..............................................................................................2-3 Table 4.1. Previously recorded archaeological sites within the project vicinity . ............................ 4-1 Table 4.2. CRAS Projects Within One Mile of the APE.................................................................4-2 Photo Photo 2.1. General environmental within the APE......................................................................... 2-1 Photo 2.2. Wetland pastures in the APE..........................................................................................2-1 Photo 5.1. Typical stratigraphy in southeast areas of the APE........................................................5-1 Photo 5.2. Stratigraphy in the northeast area of the APE................................................................ 5-1 Photo 5.3. High water table in center of APE................................................................................. 5-1 Photo 5.4. Stratigraphy in southwest portion of the APE................................................................5-1 Photo 5.5. Stratigraphy in the northwest area of the APE............................................................... 5-3 iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) conducted a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) of the 168-acre Williams Farms Planned Urban Development (PUD) in Collier County, Florida for J.R. Evans Engineering, LLC. The property is located on the south side of Lake Trafford Road, less than one kilometer (km) from the eastern shore of Lake Trafford (Figure 1.1). The project will involve construction of a residential planned urban development. The survey, completed in February 2022, was conducted at the request of Collier County Zoning Department in anticipation of permitting. The purpose of this investigation was to locate and identify any cultural resources within the project Area of Potential Effects (APE) and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). As defined in 36 CFR Part § 800.16(d), the APE is the "geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist." Based on the scale and nature of the activities, the project has a limited potential for any indirect (visual or audible) or cumulative effects outside the immediate footprint of construction. Therefore, because of the project type and location of the proposed work, the archaeological and historical APE are limited to the existing boundaries of the project. All work was carried out in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-655, as amended), as implemented by 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties, effective August 2004), as well as Chapters 267 and 373, Florida Statutes (FS), Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code, and the Florida Coastal Management Program. All work was performed in accordance with the standards and guidelines contained in the Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual: Module 3 (FDHR 2003). The Principal Investigators meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (48 FR 44716) for archaeology, history, architecture, architectural history, or historic architecture. Background research preceded the field survey, serving to provide both an informed set of expectations concerning the kinds of cultural resources that might be anticipated to occur, and a basis for evaluating any new sites discovered. ACI 1-1 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 k TE GLADES Cora HENDRY L_ COLLIER sx. 0 20 40 �km'' MONROE Lake i,jrioiu Park Lake Trafford 0 0.25 0.5 Miles LI I 0 0.5 1 0 Kilometers E L LAN2 irei`f USn r5 [j N APE n University of South Florida, County of Collier, FDEP, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METIINASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USDA, Esri, CGiAR, USGS, University of South Florida, FDEP, Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA, NPS. 2020. Figure 1.1. Location of the Williams Farms PUD APE. ACl 1-2 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Environmental factors such as geology, topography, relative elevation, soils, vegetation, and water resources are important in determining where precontact and historic period archaeological sites are likely to be located. These variables influenced what types of resources were available for utilization in a given area. This, in turn, influenced decisions regarding settlement location and land use patterns. Because of the influence of the local environmental factors upon the indigenous inhabitants, a discussion of the effective environment is included. 2.1 Location and Setting The Williams Farms PUD APE is located in Township 46 South, Ranges 28 East and 29E, Sections 31 and 36, in Collier County, Florida (United States Geological Survey [USGS] Immokalee, Fla. 1958) (Figure 2.1). The APE is located east of Immokalee Road (CR 846) off Lake Trafford Road, approximately one-half kilometer from the eastern shore of Lake Trafford. Today, the vast majority of the Williams Farm is pasture in the northern portion of the APE with wetlands in the south and west portions of the APE (Photo 2.1 and Photo 2.2). Photo 2.1. General environmental within the APE. 2.2 Geology and Geomorphology Photo 2.2. Wetland pastures in the APE. Physiographically, the APE is located within the distal peninsular zone on the Immokalee Rise which is part of the Caloosahatchee River drainage into the Big Cypress Swamp to the south (Drew 1985). The low relief, numerous water bodies (which hold temperatures steady), and low latitude combine to create the mild subtropical climate of the region. The climatic pattern is characterized by mild, dry winters and long, wet summers. The surficial hydrology of the Big Cypress Basin is dictated by the regional climate and topography. The subtropical climate is characterized by distinct wet (May - October) and dry (November -April) seasons. Over 60% of annual precipitation falls during the wet season (Drew 1985). The near level and very gently sloping topography within the Basin results in slow sheetwash runoff. Water discharges to the Gulf of Mexico via the Ten Thousand Islands (Drew 1985), and during the wet season inundation is common to depths of between a few centimeters to more than a meter (Weeks and Bates 1998). During the dry season, water is ponded in the numerous sloughs of the area. ACl 2-1 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 32 0 APE I1 f _y Y 25 --)- f —s — a - gm- .�. t mow. .• .: �# t:as s 1 �30 .. T 47 5 Traded w � w 0.5 Miles }Copyrig0.13,National`Geographic:Society;-cubed»University of -_ 0 0.5 1 mouth Florida, County of Collier, FDEP, Esri, HERE Garmin, SafeGraph, Kilometers T Geo-Fechnologim, Inc., METUNASA, USGS. EPA. NPS. US Census Bureau, USDA. USGS immokalee Figure 2.1. Environmental setting of the APE. ACl 2-2 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 2.3 Soils and Vegetation The APE includes soils from more than one soil association group. The northern portion of the APE is part of the Holopaw-Wabasso-Winder association. Soils of this association are nearly level, poorly drained, and occur in sloughs and on flatwoods (USDA 1998). The natural vegetation of the flatwoods soils includes saw palmetto, scattered areas of south Florida slash pine, scrub cypress and cabbage palm with an understory of saw palmetto, waxmytle, sand cordgrass, pineland threeawn, and chalky bluestem. The central portion of the APE is part of the Boca Riviera -Copeland association. These soils are typically poorly drained. Vegetation includes bald cypress with an understory of pickerelweed, maidencane, and sawgrass. The southern portion of the APE falls within the Winder- Riviera-Chobee association of poorly drained soils. The vegetation associated with these soils includes Florida Willow with an understory of maidencane, fireflag, and sawgrass (USDA 1998). The specific soils found within the APE are shown on Figure 2.2 and detailed in Table 2.1. Table 2.1. Soil types within the APE USDA 1998 Soil Type and Sloe Drainage Location Immokalee fs, 0-2 Poor Flatwoods Holopaw Poor Broad low flats, poorly to well defined drainage ways, de ressional areas Pineda-Riviera Poor Low broad flats and flats on marine terraces Riviera fs, limestone substrate poor Broad flats, flatwoods, depressions Tuscawilla fs Poor Flatwoods Soils play a significant role in determining what plant and animal species are available in the region. The vegetation map of Florida depicts this area as being primarily swampy forests and pine flatwoods (Davis 1980). The soil survey of the county provides information on the soil's ability to support various wildlife habitats. These include openland, woodland, and wetland. Openland consists of cropland, pasture, meadows, and areas overgrown with grasses, herbs, shrubs, and vines. This area attracts bobwhite quail, dove, field sparrow, cottontail, red fox, armadillo, and sandhill crane. The woodland wildlife habitat consists of areas of deciduous and/or coniferous plants with associated legumes, grasses, and herbaceous plants. Wildlife attracted to these locales includes turkey, thrushes, woodpeckers, owls, squirrels, gray fox, raccoon, deer, and bobcat. The wetland habitats are open, marshy, or swampy shallow water areas. Wildlife associated with these locales includes ducks, herons, shore birds, mink, beaver, egrets, and alligator. 2.4 Paleoenvironmental Considerations The early environment of the region was different from that seen today. Sea levels were lower, the climate was arid, and fresh water was scarce. An understanding of human ecology during the earliest periods of human occupation in Florida cannot be based on observations of the modern environment because of changes in water resources, botanical communities, and faunal resources. Indigenous inhabitants adapted in response to the environmental changes taking place, which were then reflected in settlement patterns, site types, artifact forms, and subsistence economies. Due to the and conditions between 16,500 and 12,500 years ago, the perched water aquifer and potable water supplies were absent. Palynological studies conducted in Florida and Georgia suggest that between 13,000 and 5000 years ago, this area was covered with an upland vegetation community of scrub oak and prairie (Watts 1969, 1971, 1975). However, the environment was not static. Evidence recovered from the inundated Page-Ladson Site in north Florida has clearly demonstrated that there ACl 2-3 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 were two periods of low water tables and dry climatic conditions and two episodes of elevated water tables and wet conditions (Dunbar 2006). The rise of sea level reduced xeric habitats over the next several millennia. Figure 2.2. Soils within the APE. ACl 2-4 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 By 5000 years ago, a climatic event marking a brief return to Pleistocene climatic conditions induced a change toward more open vegetation. Southern pine forests replaced the oak savannas. Extensive marshes and swamps developed along the coasts and subtropical hardwood forests became established along the southern tip of Florida (Delcourt and Delcourt 1981). Northern Florida saw an increase in oak species, grasses, and sedges (Carbone 1983). At Lake Annie, in south central Florida, wax myrtle and pine dominated pollen cores. The assemblage suggests that by this time, a forest dominated by longleaf pine along with cypress swamps and bayheads existed in the area (Watts 1971, 1975). Surface water was plentiful in karst terrains and the level of the Floridan aquifer rose to 1.5 m (5 ft) above present levels. With the establishment of warmer winters and cooler summers than in the preceding early Holocene, the fire adapted pine communities prevailed. These depend on the high summer precipitation caused by the thunderstorms and the accompanying lightning strikes to spark the fires (Watts et al. 1996; Watts and Hansen 1994). The increased precipitation also resulted in the formation of the large swamp systems such as the Okefenokee and Everglades (Gleason and Stone 1994). After this time, modern floral, climatic, and environmental conditions began to be established. ACl 2-5 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 3.0 CULTURE HISTORY A discussion of the culture history is included to provide a framework within which the local historical and archaeological record can be examined. Archaeological and historic sites are not individual entities, but rather are part of once dynamic cultural systems. Thus, individual sites cannot be adequately examined or interpreted without reference to other sites and resources in the general area. In general, archaeologists summarize the culture history of a given area (i.e., an archaeological region) by outlining the sequence of archaeological cultures through time. These are defined largely in geographical terms but also reflect shared environmental and cultural factors. The project area is in the Central Peninsular Gulf Coast archaeological region, which extends from north of Tampa Bay southward to the northern portion of Charlotte Harbor (Figure 3.1) (Milanich 1994; Milanich and Fairbanks 1980). Within this zone, the Paleoindian, Archaic, Formative, and Mississippian stages have been defined based on unique sets of material culture traits such as stone tools and ceramics as well as subsistence, settlement, and burial patterns. These broad temporal units are further subdivided into culture phases or periods. W Post-500 BCE regions of precolumbian Florida 3 0 100 200 Source: Esr, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographic!?, dNfS/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, � km and the GIS User Community. 2018 _ Figure 3.1 Florida Archaeological Regions with APE marked. The local history of the region is divided into four broad periods based initially upon the major governmental powers. The first period, Colonialism, occurred during the exploration and control of Florida by the Spanish and British from around 1513 until 1821. At that time, Florida became a territory of the U.S. and 21 years later became a State (Territorial and Statehood). The Civil War and Aftermath (1861-1900) period deals with the Civil War, the period of Reconstruction following the war, and the late 1800s, when the transportation systems were dramatically increased and development throughout the state expanded. The Twentieth Century includes subperiods defined by important historic events such as the two World Wars, the Florida Land Boom of the 1920s, and the Great Depression. Each of these periods evidenced differential development and utilization of the region, thus effecting the historic site distribution. ACl 3-1 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 3.1 Paleoindian The Paleoindian stage is the earliest known cultural manifestation in Florida, dating from roughly 12,000 to 7500 BCE (Before Common Era) (Milanich 1994). Archaeological evidence for Paleoindians consists primarily of scattered finds of diagnostic lanceolate -shaped projectile points. The Florida peninsula at that time was quite different than today. In general, the climate was cooler and drier with vegetation typified by xerophytic species with scrub oak, pine, open grassy prairies, and savannas (Milanich 1994:40). When human populations were arriving in Florida, the sea levels were still as much as 40 to 60 m (130-200 ft) below present levels and coastal regions of Florida extended miles beyond present-day shorelines (Faught 2004). Thus, many sites have been inundated (Faught and Donoghue 1997). The Paleoindian period has been subdivided into three horizons based upon characteristic tool forms (Austin 2001). Traditionally, it is believed that the Clovis Horizon (10,500-9000 BCE) represents the initial occupation of Florida and is defined based upon the presence of the fluted Clovis points. These are somewhat more common in north Florida. Research suggests that Suwannee and Simpson points may be contemporary with or predate Clovis (Dunbar 2006, 2016; Stanford et al. 2005). The Suwannee Horizon (9000-8500 BCE) is the best known of the three Paleoindian horizons. The lanceolate -shaped, unfluted Simpson and Suwannee projectile points are diagnostic of this time (Bullen 1975; Daniel and Wisenbaker 1987; Purdy 1981). The Suwannee tool kit includes a variety of scrapers, adzes, spokeshaves, unifacially retouched flakes, and blade -like flakes as well as bone and ivory foreshafts, pins, awls, daggers, anvils, and abraders (Austin 2001:23). Following the Suwannee Horizon is the Late Paleoindian Horizon (8500-8000 BCE). The smaller Tallahassee, Santa Fe, and Beaver Lake projectile points have traditionally been attributed to this horizon (Milanich 1994). However, many of these points have been recovered stratigraphically from late Archaic and early Woodland period components and may not date to this period at all (Austin 2001; Farr 2006). Florida notched or pseudo -notched points, including the Union, Greenbriar, and Hardaway -like points may represent late Paleoindian types, but these types have not been recovered from datable contexts and their temporal placement remains uncertain (Dunbar 2006:410). Archaeologists hypothesize that Paleoindians lived in migratory bands and subsisted by hunting and gathering, including the now -extinct Pleistocene megafauna. In addition, they likely trapped smaller animals such as mink, muskrat, and rabbit for their fur and medium sized mammal such as deer for food as well as raw materials for bone tools (Dunbar 2016; Dunbar and Vojnovski 2007). It is likely that these nomadic hunters traveled between permanent and semipermanent sources of water, such as artesian springs, exploiting the available resources. These watering holes would have attracted the animals, thus providing food and drink. In addition to being tethered to water sources, most of the Paleoindian sites are close to quality lithic resources. The settlement pattern consisted of the establishment of semipermanent habitation areas and the movement of the resources from their sources of procurement to the residential locale by specialized task groups (Austin 2001:25). Although the Paleoindian period is generally considered to have been cooler and drier, there were major variations in the inland water tables resulting from large-scale environmental fluctuations. There have been two major theories as to why most Paleoindian materials have been recovered from inundated sites. The Oasis theory, put forth by Wilfred T. Neill, was that due to low water tables and scarcity of potable water the Paleoindians and the game animals upon which they depended clustered around the few available water holes that were associated with sinkholes (Neill 1964). Whereas Ben Waller postulated that the Paleoindians gathered around river crossings to ambush the large Pleistocene animals as they crossed the rivers (Waller 1970). This implies periods of elevated water levels. Based ACI 3-2 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 on the research along the Aucilla and Wacissa Rivers, it appears that both theories are correct, depending upon what the local environmental conditions were at that time (Dunbar 2006, 2016). As such, during the wetter periods, populations became more dispersed because the water resources were abundant and the animals that they relied on could roam over a wider range. Some of the information about this period has been derived from the underwater excavations at two inland spring sites in Sarasota County: Little Salt Spring and Warm Mineral Springs (Clausen et al. 1979). Excavation at the Harney Flats Site in Hillsborough County has provided a rich body of data concerning Paleoindian life ways. Analysis indicates that this site was used as a quarry -related base camp with special use activity areas (Daniel and Wisenbaker 1987). It has been suggested that Paleoindian settlement may not have been related as much to seasonal changes as generally postulated for the succeeding Archaic period, but instead movement was perhaps related to the scheduling of tool kit replacement, social needs, and the availability of water, among other factors (Daniel and Wisenbaker 1987:175). Investigations along the Aucilla and Wacissa Rivers, as well as other sites within the north Florida rivers, have provided important information on the Paleoindian period and how the indigenous adapted to their environmental setting (Webb 2006). Studies of the Pleistocene faunal remains from these sites clearly demonstrate the importance of these animals not for food alone, but as the raw material for their bone tool industry (Dunbar and Webb 1996). 3.2 Archaic Climatic changes occurred, resulting in the disappearance of the Pleistocene megafauna and the demise of the Paleoindian culture. The disappearance of the mammoths and mastodons resulted in a reduction of open grazing lands, and thus, the subsequent disappearance of grazers such as horse, bison, and camels. With the reduction of open habitat, the more solitary woodland browser, the white- tailed deer, replaced the herd animals (Dunbar 2006:426). The intertwined data of megafaunal extinction and cultural change suggests a rapid and significant disruption in both faunal and floral assemblages. The Bolen people represent the first culture adapted to the Holocene environment (Carter and Dunbar 2006). This included a more specialized tool kit, and the introduction of chipped stone woodworking implements. Due to a lack of excavated collections and the poor preservation of bone and other organic materials in the upland sites, our knowledge of the Early Archaic artifact assemblage is limited (Carter and Dunbar 2006; Milanich 1994). Discoveries at the Page-Ladson, Little Salt Spring, and Windover sites indicate that bone and wood tools were used (Clausen et al. 1979; Doran 2002; Webb 2006). The archaeological record suggests a diffuse yet well -scheduled pattern of exploiting both coastal and interior resources. Because water sources were much more numerous and larger than previously, the Early Archaic peoples could sustain larger populations, occupy sites for longer periods, and perform activities requiring longer occupations at a specific locale (Milanich 1994:67). Marked environmental changes, which occurred some 6500 years ago, had a profound influence upon human settlement and subsistence practices. Among the landscape alterations were rises in sea and water table levels that resulted in the creation of more available surface water. In addition to changed hydrological conditions, this period is characterized by the spread of mesic forests and the beginnings of modern vegetation communities including pine forests and cypress swamps. Humans adapted to this changing environment and regional and local differences are reflected in the archaeological record (Russo 1994a, 1994b; Sassaman 2008). The Middle Archaic archaeological record is better understood than the Early Archaic. The material culture inventory included several stemmed, broad blade projectile point types including the ACl 3-3 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Newnan, Levy, Marion, and Putnam types (Bullen 1975). Population growth, as evidenced by the increased number of Middle Archaic sites and accompanied by increased socio-cultural complexity, is assumed for this time (Milanich and Fairbanks 1980). Site types included large base camps, smaller special use campsites, quarries, and burial areas. The most common sites are the smaller campsites, which were most likely used for hunting or served as special use extractive sites for such activities as gathering nuts or other botanical materials. At quarry sites, indigenous populations mined stone for their tools. They usually roughly shaped the stone prior to transporting it to another locale for finishing. A larger artifact assemblage and a wider variety of tool forms characterize base camps. During the Late Archaic period, population increased and became more sedentary. The broad - bladed, stemmed projectile styles of the Middle Archaic continued to be made with the addition of Culbreath, Lafayette, Clay, and Westo types (Bullen 1975). A greater reliance on marine resources is indicated in coastal areas. Subsistence strategies and technologies reflect the beginnings of an adaptation to these resources. Around 4000 years ago, evidence of fired clay pottery appears in Florida. The first ceramic types, tempered with fibers (Spanish moss or palmetto), are referred to as the Orange series. Initially, it was thought that they lacked decoration until about 1700 BCE, when they were decorated with geometric designs and punctations. Research has called this ceramic chronology into question; accelerator mass spectrometry dates from a series of incised Orange sherds from the middle St. Johns River Valley have produced dates contemporaneous with the plain varieties (Sassaman 2003). Milanich (1994:86-87) suggests that while there may be little difference between Middle and Late Archaic populations, there are more Late Archaic sites, and they were primarily located near wetlands. The abundant wetland resources allowed larger settlements to be maintained. It is likely that the change in settlement patterns was related to the environmental changes. By the end of the Middle Archaic, the climate closely resembled that of today and the vegetation changed from those species which preferred moist conditions to pines and mixed forests (Watts and Hansen 1988). Sea levels rose, inundating many sites located along the shoreline. The adaptation to this environment allowed for a wider variety of resources to be exploited and a wider variation in settlement patterns. No longer were the scarce waterholes dictating the location of sites. Shellfish, fish, and other food sources were now available from coastal and freshwater wetlands resulting in an increased population size. The Late Archaic Transitional stage refers to that portion of the ceramic Archaic when sand was mixed with the fibers as a tempering agent. The same settlement and subsistence patterns were being followed. It has been suggested that during this period there was a diffusion of cultural traits because of the movement of small groups (Bullen 1959, 1965). This resulted in the appearance of several different ceramic and lithic tool traditions, and the beginning of cultural regionalism. 3.3 Formative The Formative stage is comprised of the Manasota and Weeden Island -related cultures (ca. 500 BCE to 800 CE [Common Era]). Settlement patterns consisted of permanent villages located along the coast with seasonal forays into the interior to hunt, gather, and collect those resources unavailable along the coast. Most Manasota sites are shell middens found on or near the shore where indigenous villagers had easiest access to fish and shellfish (Milanich 1994). The subsistence economy focused on the coastal exploitation of maritime resources, supplemented by hunting and gathering inland resources (Luer and Almy 1982). Investigations at the Shaw's Point, Fort Brook Midden, Yat Kitischee, and Myakkahatchee sites have provided a wealth of information on site formation, subsistence economies, and technology and their changes over time (Austin 1995; Austin et al. 1992; Luer et al. 1987; Schwadron 2002). The major villages were located along the shore with smaller sites being located up to 19-29 kilometers (km) (12-18 miles) inland. These inland sites, which probably served as seasonal ACI 3-4 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 villages or special use campsites, were often located in the pine flatwoods on elevated lands proximate to a source of freshwater where a variety of resources could be exploited (Austin and Russo 1989; Luer and Almy 1982). Hardin and Piper (1984) suggest that some of the larger inland sites may be permanent or semipermanent settlements as opposed to seasonal campsites. Manasota is characterized by a wide range of material cultural traits such as a well -developed shell and bone tool technology, sand tempered plain ceramics, and burials within shell middens (Luer and Almy 1982). Much of the shell and bone technology evolved out of the preceding Archaic period. Through time, the burial patterns became more elaborate, with burials being placed within sand burial mounds located near the villages and middens. The early burial patterns consisted of primary flexed burials in the shell middens, while later sites contained secondary burials within sand mounds. Temporal placement within the Manasota period can be determined based upon diagnostic ceramic rim and vessel forms (Luer and Almy 1982). The early forms (ca. 500 BCE to 400 CE) are characterized as flattened globular bowls with incurving rims and chamfered lips. Pot forms with rounded lips and inward curving rims were utilized from about 200 BCE until 700 CE. Deeper pot forms with straight sides and rounded lips were developed around 400 CE and continued into the Safety Harbor period. Simple bowls with outward curving rims and flattened lips were used from the end of the Late Weeden Island period (ca. 800 CE) into the Safety Harbor period. Vessel wall thickness decreased over time. The lithic assemblage of the Manasota culture was scarce along the coast especially in the more southern portions of the region where stone suitable for tool manufacture was absent. Projectile point types associated with the Manasota period include the Sarasota, Hernando, and Westo varieties (Luer and Almy 1982). Influences from the Weeden Island "heartland," located in north central Florida, probably resulted in the changes in burial practices. These influences can also be seen in the increased variety of ceremonial ceramic types through time. The secular, sand tempered ware continued to be the dominant ceramic type. Manasota evolved into what is referred to as a Weeden Island -related culture. The subsistence and settlement patterns remained consistent. Hunting and gathering of the inland and coastal resources continued. The ceramic types and other exotic artifacts present within the burial mounds indicate a widespread trade network. Ceremonialism and its expressions, such as the construction of complex burial mounds containing exotic and elaborate grave offerings, reached their greatest development during this period. Similarly, the subsistence economy, divided between maritime and terrestrial animals and perhaps horticultural products, represents the maximum effective adjustment to the environment. Many Weeden Island -related sites consist of villages with associated mounds, as well as ceremonialiburial mound sites. The presence of Weeden Island ceramic types distinguishes the artifact assemblage. These are among some of the finest ceramics in the Southeast; they are often thin, well fired, burnished, and decorated with incising, punctations, complicated stamping, and animal effigies (Milanich 1994:211). Coastal sites are marked by the presence of shell middens, indicating a continued pattern of exploitation of marine and estuarine resources. Interaction between the inland farmer -gatherers and coastal hunter - gatherers may have developed into mutually beneficial exchange systems (Kohler 1991:98). This could account for the presence of non -locally made ceramics at some of the Weeden Island -related period sites. There is no definitive evidence for horticulture in the coastal area (Milanich 1994:215). ACI 3-5 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 3.4 Ten Thousand Islands Glades I - Beginning around 500 BCE, fiber tempered and semi fiber tempered pottery of the Late Archaic period was replaced by sand tempered pottery (Glades plain). This change in tempering agent marks the beginning the Glades cultural tradition. For 700 years, sand tempered plain pottery dominated the assemblage, but from 200 CE (Common Era) and lasting until 800 CE, Gordon's Pass Incised, Sanibel Incised, and an, as of yet unclassified decorated pottery type, were the predominant decorated types (Carr and Beriault 1984; Griffin 1988). The tremendous increase in Glades I sites within the Big Cypress indicates a dramatic increase in the usage of the area during this time (Widmer 1988), and the geographic extent of the Glades I diagnostics indicates a considerable degree of interchange and interaction (Griffin 1988). Glades II - The Glades II era (800 to 1200 CE) is marked by a tremendous diversity in decorated ceramic types. Goggin (n.d.) described the decorations as being "neatly and cleanly cut and apparently made with swift cutting strokes while the clay is partially dry." Glades IIa (750-900 CE) is identified by the presence of Key Largo Incised, Opa Locka Incised, and Miami Incised. During Glades IIb (900-1100 CE), Key Largo Incised remained the primary decorated ware. The number of sites increased, and the period would appear to be one of "relative stability in technology and subsistence" (Griffin 1988:140). From ca. 1100 to 1200 CE there is conspicuous absence of decorated pottery and the number of sites drops dramatically (Griffin 1988:142). This cultural hiatus has been correlated to the Neoatlantic warm period and associated with high sea levels (Fairbridge 1984:431; Gleason et al. 1984:321). Glades III - The Glades III era begins with the reintroduction of decorated ceramics; however, the motifs and techniques are noticeably different from the previous styles. Glades IIIa (1200-1400 CE) is identified by the appearance of Surfside Incised, St. Johns Check Stamped, and Safety Harbor wares. There is an accompanying increase in bone ornaments. Then again, ca. 1400 CE, ceramic decoration ceases with the exception of tooled rim types (Griffin 1988). Griffin hypothesizes that this ceramic style might have been associated with increasing Calusa influence in the area (Griffin 1988:142). Whereas the earlier cultural periods of the Glades era are defined exclusively by the archaeological record, historical documents provide greater information, including tribal names, for the peoples of the terminal Glades III period. Much of the early historical ethnographic information is derived from the account of Hernando de Escalante Fontaneda, a Spanish captive of the Calusa (True 1944). During his 17-year captivity, Fontaneda learned of the political structure, economy, social hierarchy, and religion of the indigenous south Florida people. 3.5 Colonialism The Timucuan Indians are the historic counterparts of the Safety Harbor people. In the Tampa Bay area, they are referred to as the Tocobaga, extending from roughly Tarpon Springs southward to the Sarasota area (Bullen 1978). The Tocobaga consisted of several small chiefdoms whose leaders frequently waged war against each other. The most powerful chiefdom was Tocobaga, located at the head of Old Tampa Bay at the Safety Harbor site; other major chiefdoms included the Mococo (at the mouth of the Alafia River) and Ucita (at the mouth of the Little Manatee River) (Hann 2003). The cultural traditions of the native Floridians ended with the advent of European expeditions to the New World. The initial events, authorized by the Spanish crown in the 1500s, ushered in devastating European contact. After Ponce de Leon's landing near St. Augustine in 1513, Spanish explorations were confined to the west coast of Florida; Panfilo de Narvaez is thought to have made ACl 3-6 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 shore in 1528 in St. Petersburg and Hernando de Soto's 1539 landing is commemorated at Desoto Point on the south bank of the Manatee River. The Spaniards briefly established a fort and garrison at Tocobaga in the 1560s. In 1568, the Tocobaga killed all of the soldiers; when a Spanish supply ship arrived, the Tocobaga left, and the Spanish burned the village (Hann 2003). The area that now constitutes the State of Florida was ceded to Great Britain in 1763 after two centuries of Spanish possession. Britain governed Florida until 1783 when the Treaty of Paris returned Florida to Spain; however, Spanish influence was nominal during this second period. Prior to American settlement, portions of the Muskogean Creek, Yamassee, and Oconee tribes moved into Florida and repopulated the demographic vacuum created by the decimation of the original indigenous inhabitants. These migrating groups of Native Americans became known to English speakers as Seminole. They had an agriculturally based society, focusing upon cultivation of crops and the raising of horses and cattle. The material culture of the Seminole remained like the Creek; the dominant indigenous pottery type being Chattahoochee Brushed. British trade goods were common. Their settlement pattern included villages located near rich agricultural fields and grazing lands. Their early history can be divided into two basic periods: Colonization (1716-1767) when the initial movement of Creek towns into Florida occurred, and Enterprise (1767-1821) which was an era of prosperity under the British and Spanish rule prior to the American presence (Mahon and Weisman 1996). The Seminole formed at various times loose confederacies for mutual protection against the American Nation to the north (Tebeau 1980:72). The Seminole crossed back and forth into Georgia and Alabama conducting raids and welcoming escaped slaves. This resulted in General Andrew Jackson's invasion of Florida in 1818, which became known as the First Seminole War. 3.6 Territorial and Statehood Florida became a U.S. Territory in 1821 due in part to the First Seminole War and the signing of the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819. Andrew Jackson, named provisional governor, divided the territory into St. Johns and Escambia Counties. At that time, St. Johns County encompassed all of Florida lying east of the Suwannee River. Escambia County included the land lying to the west. The first territorial census in 1825, recorded some 5077 living east of the Suwannee River; by 1830, that number had risen to 8956 (Tebeau 1980:134). Even though the First Seminole War was fought in north Florida, the Treaty of Moultrie Creek in 1823, at the end of the war, was to affect the settlement of the entire state. The Seminole relinquished their claim to the whole peninsula in return for occupancy of an approximately four million acre reservation south of Ocala and north of Charlotte Harbor (Mahon 1985). The reservation was found to be nearly barren, with poor soils, few good hammocks, and frequently covered with water during the rainy season (Knetsch 2008:8). The treaty never satisfied the native peoples nor the incoming settlers. The inadequacy of the reservation and desperate situation of the Seminole living there plus the mounting demand of the settlers for their removal soon produced another conflict. In 1824, Cantonment (later Fort) Brooke was established on the south side of the mouth of the Hillsborough River, in what is now downtown Tampa, by Colonel George Mercer Brooke for overseeing the angered Seminole. Frontier families followed the soldiers, and the settlement of the Tampa Bay area began. This caused problems for the military as civilian settlements were not in accord with the Treaty of Moultrie Creek (Guthrie 1974:10). By 1830, the Department of War established a military reserve around Fort Brooke with boundaries extending 16 miles to the north, west and east of the fort (Chamberlin 1968:43) The 256 square mile military reservation included a guardhouse, barracks, storehouse, powder magazine, and stables. ACI 3-7 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Hillsborough County was established in 1834 by the Territorial Legislature of Florida because of the instrumental efforts of Augustus Steele, who arrived in 1832 (Piper and Piper 1982). At that time, the county reached north to Dade City and south to Charlotte Harbor, encompassing eight future counties covering an area that today comprises Pasco, Polk, Manatee, Sarasota, Desoto, Charlotte, Highlands, Hardee, Pinellas, and Hillsborough counties. The county was named for the "river which ran through it and the bay into which the river flowed" (Bruton and Bailey 1984:18; Robinson 1928:22). Due to its isolated location, Hillsborough County was slow to develop. The Tampa Bay post office was closed at this time and reestablished as "Tampa" on September 13, 1834 (Bradbury and Hallock 1962). As settlement in the area increased, so did hostilities with Native Americans. The growing threat of the Seminole to the civilians near the fort propelled them to sign a petition asking for military protection. By 1835, the Second Seminole War was underway, triggered by an attack on Major Francis Langhorne Dade as he led a company of soldiers from Fort Brooke to Fort King (now Ocala). As part of the effort to subdue hostilities in Florida, military patrols moved into the wilderness in search of any Seminole concentrations. As the Second Seminole War escalated, attacks on isolated settlers and communities became more common. To combat this, the combined service units of the army and navy converged on southwest Florida. This joint effort attempted to seal off the southern portion of the Florida peninsula from the estimated 300 Seminole remaining in the Big Cypress Swamp and Everglades (Covington 1958; Tebeau and Carson 1965). In 1837, Fort Brooke became the headquarters for the Army of the South and the main garrison for the Seminole wars. The fort also served as a haven for settlers who had to leave their farms and seek protection from the warring Seminole (Piper et al. 1982). Several other forts were established around the area during the Seminole War years. Their uses varied from military garrisons to military supply depots; others were built to protect the nearby settlers during uprisings. These included Fort Alabama (later Fort Foster), Fort Thonotosassa, and Fort Simmons (Bruton and Bailey 1984). The Second Seminole War ended in 1842 when the federal government withdrew troops from Florida. Some of the battle -weary Seminoles were "persuaded" to relocate west where the federal government had set aside land for native resettlement. However, those who wished to remain were allowed to do so but were pushed further south into the Everglades and Big Cypress Swamp, which became the last Seminole stronghold (Mahon 1985:321). In 1840, the population of Hillsborough County was 452, with 360 of those residing at Fort Brooke (HT/HCPB 1980:7). Encouraged by the passage of the Armed Occupation Act in 1842, designed to promote settlement and protect the Florida frontier, settlers moved south through Florida. The Act made available 200,000 acres outside the already developed regions south of Gainesville to the Peace River, barring coastal lands and those within a two-mile radius of a fort. It stipulated that any family or single man over 18 able to bear arms could earn title to 160 acres by erecting a habitable dwelling, cultivating at least five acres of land, and living on it for five years. During the nine months that the law was in effect, 1184 permits were issued totaling some 189,440 acres (Covington 1961:48). On March 3, 1845, the Florida was admitted to the Union as the 271}i state with Tallahassee as its capital. Ten years later, Manatee County, which at that time included the APE, was carved from portions of Hillsborough and Mosquito Counties with the village of Manatee as the county seat (Marth 1973). In 1872, W.L. Apthorp and M.H. Clay surveyed the exterior lines of Township 46 South, Range 28-29 East (State of Florida 1843c, 1843b, 1843a, 1849). No historic features were depicted on the plat or mentioned in the field notes within the Township (State of Florida 1850; 1873) (Figure 3.2). The section lines around the east, north, and west lines of Section 33 were described as 3rd rate pine and 3rd rate prairie (State of Florida 1849:335, 341, 380). ACI 3-8 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Township 465; Range 28-29E, 1873 160 o nlpb e° I6o Sec. 2. Sec, I 0 0.5 1 km Sec =. Sec 29. 1 _ I - 9.0 o Sec 31. S . 32 s 191 So � �� ` 46.oa1 � p- 3 2 1. • � N � sec. 6. L Sec. 5. a 3 /rj APE Figure 3.2. 1873 plat showing the APE. 3.7 Civil War and Aftermath On January 10, 1861, Florida followed South Carolina and Mississippi and seceded from the Union as a prelude to the American Civil War. Florida had much at stake as evidenced in a report released from Tallahassee in June of 1861. It listed the value of land in Florida as $35,127,721 and the value of the slaves at $29,024,513 (Dunn 1989:59). Although the Union blockaded the coast of Florida during the war, the interior of the state saw very little military action. Florida became one of the major contributors of beef to the Confederate government (Shofner 1995:72). Jacob Summerlin, "King of the Crackers," originally had a contract with the Confederate government to market thousands of heads a year at eight dollars per head. However, by driving his cattle to Punta Rassa and shipping them to Cuba, he received 25 dollars per head (Grismer 1946:83). To limit the supply of beef transported to the Confederate government, Union troops stationed at Ft. Myers conducted several raids into the Peace River Valley to seize cattle and destroy ranches. In response, Confederate supporters formed the First Battalion, Florida Special Cavalry, more famously known as the Confederate "Cow Cavalry," consisting of nine companies under the command of Colonel Charles J. Munnerlyn (Akerman 1976). Many local inhabitants were impacted by the unfolding events, including Jesse Knight, who had been established in Hillsborough County since 1852; Knight and his family moved to Manatee County during the war to protect his cattle from the marauding Union soldiers (McCarthy and Dame 1983). The cattlemen and the farmers in the state lived simply. The typical home was a log cabin without windows or chinking, and settlers' diets consisted largely of fried pork, corn bread, sweet potatoes, and hominy. The lack of railway transport to other states, the federal embargo, and the enclaves of Union supporters and Union troops holding key areas such as Jacksonville and Ft. Myers prevented an influx of finished materials. Thus, settlement remained limited until after the war. ACI 3-9 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Immediately following the war, the South underwent a period of Reconstruction to prepare the former Confederate states for readmission to the Union. Administered by Congress, on July 25, 1868 Florida officially regained statehood (Tebeau 1980). Congress passed the Homestead Act of 1866, enticing union loyalists and freedmen into Florida to establish farms. In most of the early settlements, development followed the earlier pattern with few settlers, one or two stores, and a lack of available overland transportation. Those communities along the coast developed a little faster due to the accessibility of coastal transportation. In 1866, the Manatee County seat was moved from the village of Manatee to Pine Level, and the community of Miakka developed along the Pine Level Road which connected the two communities. The early settlers included the Hancock, Vanderipe, and Chapman families as well as Augustus Williams, Garrett Murphy, Bill Rawls, Mr. Webb and Mr. Summeralls (Deming et al. 1989). In 1875, the first church and school building were constructed; four years later the post office was established (Bradbury and Hallock 1962:53). The Hancocks, Murphys, and Knights maintained large herds of cattle that were tended to by Peter and Marion Carlton, among others (Zilles 1976). The Crowleys moved to the area in the 1880s and John Crowley established a blacksmith shop. In 1885, they dug a drainage channel through their property to control flooding along the Myakka River (Hutchinson 2005). In addition to cattle ranching, farming and citrus production were important economic activates. Crops included rice, tomatoes, corn, and sugar cane. Florida faced a fiscal crisis involving title to public lands in the early 1880s. By Act of Congress in 1850, the federal government turned over to the states for drainage and reclamation all "swamp and overflow land." Florida received approximately 10 million acres. To manage that land and the 5,000,000 acres the state had received on entering the Union, the state legislature in 1851 created the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund. In 1855, the legislature established the actual fund (the Florida Internal Improvement Fund), in which state lands were to be held. The fund became mired in debt after the Civil War, and under state law, no land could be sold until the debt was cleared. In 1881, the Trustees started searching for a buyer capable of purchasing enough acreage to pay off the fund's debt and permit the sale of the remaining millions of acres that it controlled. Hamilton Disston, a member of a prominent Pennsylvania saw manufacturing family contracted with the State of Florida in 1881 to purchase four million acres of swamp and overflow land for one million dollars. In exchange, he promised to drain and improve the land. This transaction, known as the Disston Purchase, enabled the distribution of land subsidies to railroad companies, inducing them to begin construction of new lines throughout the state. During the early 1880s, the Florida Southern Railway acquired the old railroad charter and land grant of the Gainesville, Ocala, and Charlotte Harbor Railroad which was due to expire in 1885. To hold this charter and secure lands, immediate railroad construction was necessary. Construction started in the Bartow area of Polk County and continued southward to Punta Gorda. In November 1885, the Southern was absorbed by the Plant System, which eventually became the Atlantic Coastline Railroad (Pettengill 1952). The Jacksonville, Tampa, and Key West Railway Company was deeded the land within the APE in 1884 (State of Florida n.d.:149). With the railroad as a catalyst, the 1880s witnessed a sudden surge of buying land for speculation, agriculture, and settlement in Manatee County, which prompted the creation of Desoto County in 1887 from eastern Manatee County. The Disston Purchase, although technically legal, was extremely generous with the designation "swamp and overflow land." Grismer (1946) estimated that at least half of the acreage was "high and dry." Disston's purchase effectively removed four million acres of public lands from would be homesteaders. Settlers in the Sarasota area, most of whom had settled their land under the Homestead Act of 1862, were disgruntled with the sale of the swamp and overflowed land to Disston, which included nearly 700,000 acres in Manatee County. In response, Sarasota area residents established the ACI 3-10 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Vigilance Committee to retaliate against land speculators. In 1884, two men suspected of cooperating with the developers were murdered. The resulting trial in the county seat of Pine Level divided the county. Tax records reveal that most of the 700,000 acres in Manatee County was sold to eight companies, including three railroad companies and the Florida Mortgage & Investment Co. established by Sir Edward James Reed of Britain, which is credited with founding the town of Sarasota (Marth 1973; Tischendorf 1954). Disston had sold half of his contract to the British Florida Land and Mortgage Company in 1882 to cover the second payment on the Purchase since Disston's assets had been tied up in the drainage contract (Tischendorf 1954). In 1885, the first group of colonists from Scotland arrived in what is today Sarasota. John Hamilton Gillespie, the son of the Florida Mortgage & Investment Company's president, oversaw developing a community. Despite a downturn following the financial panic of 1893, the Great Freeze of 1894-95, and war with Spain in 1898, the community continued to develop as a winter resort advertising Sarasota's warm weather, white beaches, plentiful fishing, golf course, and blue oceans (FWP 1939; Grismer 1946; Marth 1973; Matthews 1997). 3.8 Twentieth Century The turn of the century prompted optimism and excitement about growth and development. hi 1902, the United States & West Indies Railroad & Steamship Co., a subsidiary of the Seaboard line, started laying track from Tampa through Bradenton into Sarasota. The first train arrived in March 1903, and the track was extended into Venice by 1912 (Marth 1973). In 1910, Mrs. Bertha Honore Palmer, widow of Chicago financier Potter Palmer, traveled to Sarasota accompanied by her brother Adrian Honore and her sons Potter Jr. and Honore. The quartet was so taken with the area that they established companies that would ultimately come to hold a quarter of the land in present day Sarasota County (Matthews 1997). Mrs. Palmer established a showplace estate along Little Sarasota Bay, a 30,000-acre cattle ranch, the Palmer Experimental Farms, and the Bee Ridge Farms, Bee Ridge Homesites, and Sarasota -Venice real estate ventures (Matthews 1997). In 1911, Mrs. Palmer purchased 26,000 acres east of Sarasota, in the Fruitville vicinity, which were developed into farms and modified for producing celery. The development also included road building, ditching and clearing property, expert farm supervision, and cooperative marketing facilities (FWP 1939:270). In the Miakka area, her cattle ranch was named Meadowsweet Pastures. She was ahead of her times in terms of cattle management by being one of the first to fence in her cattle, grow corn for supplemental feed, and to begin "dipping" her cattle to eliminate ticks from her herd (McCarthy and Dame 1983). The investment in infrastructure contributed to the Florida Land Boom of the early 1920s along with the growing number of tourists, greater use of the automobile, national post -First World War prosperity, and, perhaps most importantly, the promise by the state legislature never to pass state income or inheritance taxes. Growing populations necessitated more governmental facilities and in 1921 Sarasota County was formed from southern Manatee County. These halcyon days were short lived, however, and during 1926-27, the Florida real estate market collapsed. The wild land speculation that preceded the land "bust" resulted in banks finding it impossible to track loans or property values. The hurricanes of 1926 and 1928, the Mediterranean fruit fly invasion and subsequent paralysis of the citrus industry, the October 1929 stock market crash, and the onset of the Great Depression only worsened the situation. Sarasota County, along with the rest of Florida, was in a state of economic stagnation. ACI 3-11 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 To combat the economic hardships, the Murphy Act was passed in 1931. As early as 1928, landowners had stopped paying taxes on their property. The Murphy Act stated, "if taxes were delinquent, any man could pay taxes for two years on the land and get a quit claim deed on it. Then if the former owner did not claim the land for another two years the new owner could pay for two more years of taxes and get a deed that would stand up in court" (Zilles 1976:12). Much of the land in the rural areas of Sarasota County was acquired during this period. In 1933, ranchers began dipping their cattle and livestock to fight the cattle tick infestation and soon after, fencing laws were established; by 1935, the open ranges were gone (Zilles 1976). By the mid-1930s, federal programs implemented by the Roosevelt administration provided jobs for the unemployed who could work. The programs were instrumental in the construction of parks, bridges, and public buildings. The Public Works Administration was responsible for the construction of an airport hangar at Albee Field in Venice, a soft water treatment plant and municipal auditorium in Sarasota, a waterworks extension to Sarasota Heights, and the repairing and paving of a section of U.S. 41 (Wise 1995:102). In 1934, the Myakka River State Forest was formed from roughly 17,000 acres of land that originally belonged to Mrs. Potter. Over 250 men working for the Civilian Conservation Corps developed the park by building roads, bridges, pavilions, restrooms, and cabins (Grismer 1946). Following the Second World War, car ownership increased making the American public more mobile and vacations less expensive. Many of the service members stationed in the area returned with their families. This influx of young families resulted in the development of small tract homes in new subdivisions. In 1954, Arthur Frizzell sold massive tracts in Sarasota (approximately 72 square miles) and Charlotte Counties to Florida West Coast Land Development Company of Miami (Matthews 1983:150). Part of this acreage encompassed both the Myakka River and Big Slough. The General Development Corporation paid $2.5 million in 1959 for the 80,000 acres that became North Port and Port Charlotte. In the late 1950s, an inland navigation route along Florida's west coast from Tarpon Springs south to Punta Rassa was planned. The West Coast Inland Navigation District constructed the intracoastal waterway. In 1961, the Tamiami Trail, originally constructed in the 1920s, was widened to four lanes (Matthews 1983:160). During the same period, agricultural practice in the rural parts of Sarasota contended with residential development, and flooding became a frequent problem. Historic canals were excavated to reduce pasture flooding and irrigate agricultural land. The 1958 Immokalee quad map shows no significant development in the APE during this period (Figure 3.3). 3.9 APE Specifics A review of the historic Ives 1856 map (Ives 1856) showed some trails around the APE and possibly in the vicinity of Fort Simon Drum (Figure 3.4). The 1930 Roy Nash map (Nash 1930) suggests that there are no known Seminole camps in the area of the APE (Figure 3.5). The aerial photographs of the APE from 1953 and 1980, available from the Publication of Archival Library & Museum Materials (PALMM), and the 1958 Immokalee quad map were examined (USDA 1953, 1963; USGS Immokalee 1958) (Figure 3.6). They show little development within the APE at least through the mid-20th century. The northern most portion of the parcel was utilized as grove land and the northeastern boundary of the APE is partially defined by a stream feeding into the wetlands in the southern portion of the APE. There are multiple ponds and sinks in the southwest portion of the parcel and streams or tributaries in the southeast. ACI 3-12 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 N u G\i mAa ¥ nS _ -- ® � 2�-f� \ _» 3 � \� , IdL - _ At - �� ' -- _ � _I4419 z ° _era - - SAp- - - - - - «_�-- ._ ~ \ z _ ,/ o ��E _ Figure 3a.1958 quad map showing the A#£. *q 3 1a cRASWilliams FarmsPURcllrc. qmw Approximate Project Location n k F k 1 i � !. l '��� I yti fir-•—•�,w + a 01 k T { r •rsuM� a KnllN�in t �•rrf f3 . 3°R1d *,M a*/i Jf 1 q - - t Y N u•tp i, '� - w -f Rr ~.• - t 4 4. .01 � --;W- i� 4i�,�r + a t -i fix. s r i1N. a �F F.! 'k�f j'� Fr it • 'C,� ,. T t " y ; 4 P a,;.,r,• rt #prr.lu �'`�,"1r � " u a RR4"u�ti • r+r`r C-k�. - Otis .4rL i s y�1 � r • * 1'L f } � .``L` _'�e f ��...a ,y *A ; - i L b '•� �4rkWiy� -tom - 7*++"i?'�♦ 1! :{"' , -ice Ik'arr� k F�rr.-e!{��f;:�.``h� �` �.. y� �.�� s ♦ i 1 �i�;t,� � # 41 y $. 4� ell 4 ` _ � $ •; = T • � �4 : ice# '� a A r � � 4�F,3 !• + ♦ • i T_ 4.1 41 -/.j. SAS cart-; !b• 'F'k�+! ilh+. I'a Kilometers 1 - ; , . , #,' * + '„ • w Figure 3.4. Historic Ives Map of Peninsular Florida showing locations of Seminole War forts and Seminole camps. ACI 3-14 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 r� rOL U�V.A _. C, i L � It E 4L. i 0 10 20 Kilometers fip O Camp N Approximate Project Location A ruse it _ X P Ft r 5 PfA MP kh Figure 3.5. 1930 Nash survey of historic Seminole Camps in the Big Cypress Swamp. ACl 3-15 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Figure 3.6. 1953 and 1980 aerials of the APE showing a stream and unimproved construction area within the APE. ACl 3-16 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 4.0 RESEARCH CONSIDERATIONS AND METHODS 4.1 Background Research and Literature Review A review of archaeological and historical literature, records and other documents and data pertaining to the project area was conducted. The focus of this research was to ascertain the types of cultural resources known in the project area and vicinity, their temporal/cultural affiliations, site location information, and other relevant data. This included a review of sites listed in the NRHP, the Florida Master Site Files (FMSF), cultural resource survey reports, published books and articles, aerial photographs, unpublished manuscripts, and maps. In addition to the NRHP and FMSF, other information relevant to the historical research was obtained from the files of ACI. The FMSF data in this report were obtained in February 2022, which is the most recent edition. However, according to FMSF staff, input may be a month or more behind receipt of reports and site files. No individuals with knowledge of historic or prehistoric activities specific to the APE were encountered during this project; thus, no informant interviews were conducted. 4.2 Archaeological Considerations The background research indicated that two archaeological sites, 8CR000725 (Buried Tin) and 8)1065 Lake Trafford Canoes are located within the APE (Figure 4.1). Buried Tin is pre -Contact mound with pottery; however, the initial report speculated that this mound may be natural and not cultural in origin (AHC 1991). The Williamson Site 2 is a Glades Period Site (1000 BC- AD 1700) that appears as a cluster of four mounds east and west of the slough. The surveyor suggested some of the mounds may be natural, but suggested that the larger mounds, which are east of the slough, may have been man-made or modified. There are four additional sites are located within 1.6 kilometers (km) (1 mile). Two of the sites outside the APE are potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP, according to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The remainder of the sites have not been evaluated by the SHPO. Data on these sites are presented in Table 4.1 and the sites within the APE are highlighted. Table 4.1. Pr viously recorded archaeolo ical sites within the reject vicinity. FMSF# Site Name Site Type Associated Reference SHPO Cultures Evaluation Arrowhead Campsite (precontact) ; Glades, 1000 B.C.- Beriault, Potentially 8CR00828 Midden procurement site; A.D. 1700 John 2002 Eligible recontact midden 8CR00703 Williamson Precontact burial mound Glades, 1000 B.C.- Beriault, Potentially Mound 1 A.D. 1700 John 2002 Eligible 8CR00704 Williamson Precontact mound(s) Glades, 1000 B.C.- Carr, Robert Not Site 2 A.D. 1700 S. 1989 Evaluated 8CR00725 Buried Tin Precontact mound(s) Precontact with AHC 1991 Not pottery Evaluated Lake Log Boat - Historic or Caloosahatchee IIa Not 8CRO1065 Trafford prehistoric and Ilb, A.D. 500- Evaluated Canoes 1200 Campsite (precontact); Archaic, 8500 Art 8CR01066 Lake midden (precontact)• B.C.E.-1000 C.E.; Engineering Not Trafford Artifact scatter -low density Glades, 1000 2004 Evaluated (< 2 per sq meter) B.C.E.-1700 C.E. ACI 4-1 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Eleven CRAS projects have been conducted within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the APE. Table 4.2 provides details on these projects. Table 4.2. CRAS Projects Within One Mile of the APE. Survey Title Reference # New # Old # Sites Sites Florida 1108 Historical/architectural survey of Collier County, Florida Preservation 120 Services 1986 2458 An Archaeological and Historical Survey of Part of the Carr, Robert S. 2 Williamson Property, Collier County, Florida 1989 2934 Collier County Survey AHC 1991 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Lake Trafford Banguilan, Alvin 6605 Environmental Restoration Critical Project Area, Collier J. and Charles County, Florida Cantley 2000 7228 An Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Beriault, John G. 2 1 Arrowhead Parcel, Collier County, Florida 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the FPL Collier- Janus Research 11715 Orange River # 3, 230 KV Transmission Line: Segment D, 2005 1 0 Collier County 14587 Lake Trafford Critical Restoration Project - Aquascan ART Engineering, 2 0 Radar Survey Report LLC 2004 15050 Littoral Survey of Lake Trafford, Collier County Hoffinan, Kathleen S. 2008 1 0 15935 Phase 1 Cultural Resource Survey for the Esperanza Place White, Matthew 0 0 Property, Collier County, Florida 2008 Phase I Archaeological Survey Letter for Trileaf Heller, Abigail 26023 Corporation, Trileaf Project 644668 (Little League 2019 Road/FL-0128), Immokalee, Collier County, Florida Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment Survey, Lake Burns, Jason et al. 27342 Trafford Aquatic Enhancement Project, Immokalee, 2020 Collier County, Florida Based on these data, and other regional site location predictive models (ACI 1992, 1999, 2014a, 2014b; Austin 1987; Bellomo and Fuhrmeister 1991; Dickel 1991; Smith 2008) and informed expectations concerning the types of sites likely to occur within the project APE, as well as their probable environmental settings, was generated. As archaeologists have long realized, indigenous populations did not select their habitation sites and activity areas in a random fashion. Rather, many environmental factors had a direct influence upon site location selection, including soil drainage, distance to water, topography, and proximity to resources. It should be noted that the settlement pattern noted below cannot be applied to sites of the Paleoindian and Early Archaic periods, which precede the onset of modern environmental conditions. Analysis of the data for the 32 indigenous archaeological sites, with known locations in the Immokalee Rise physiographic region of Collier County that is outside of National Park Service (NPS) lands, was conducted. The NPS lands were not included as there is not a modern soil survey for that area. Historic archaeological sites and indigenous archaeological sites that were plotted "per vague verbal description" were deleted from this analysis. Although this is a small sample size, it can give us clues as to which areas were preferred. ACI 4-2 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Archaeological Site N APE f - ail .- 26 -- - - _ _ - --- 4 - _ -- 8CR00725 - -sz-- — —--_._�—---.=--- 8CR00703 - - e 8CRO1066 _ 8CR01065 „ 0 0.25 a0 5 Miles - - Copyright•© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed. mmokalee 0 Kilometers Figure 4.1. Previously recorded archaeological site within one mile of the APE. ACl 4-3 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Proximity to water is an important site location feature. Over 96% of the sites are located within 100 m (328 ft) of a water source, and only one of the sites greater than 200 m (656 ft) from a water source (Table 4.2). Ninety percent of the sites are proximate to a wetland or swamp, while three sites are associated with a lake. Table.4.2. Distribution of sites by water type and distance. <100 m (356 ft) <200 m (656 ft) <300 m (984 ft) Total Type Cnt % Cot % Cnt % Cnt % Lake 3 9.38% 0.00% 0.00% 3 9.38% Swamp/wetland 28 87.50% 0.00% 1 3.13% 29 90.63% Total 31 96.88% 0 0.00% 1 3.13% 32 100.00% Soil types and their drainage characteristics can also be used to assess the likelihood for indigenous site occurrence (Almy 1978). There are 45 soil types within this study area; of which 36 have recorded archaeological sites (Table 4.3). Many of the sites occurred on more than one soil type. This analysis only includes the four types covering the greatest acreage for each site, which totaled 352 soil type occurrences. The column "l", indicates that this soil type had the greatest area of the site, and so on down the line, so that the "4" column had the smallest site acreage. However, this analysis may not prove an accurate representation of the site distribution. While we know the percentage of sites on the various soil types, we do not have an accurate assessment as to how much of each soil type has been surveyed for archaeological sites. Table 4.3. Distribution of sites by drainage and soil types. DRAINAGE/Soil Type, % slopes % °f Area 1 2 3 4 Total % of Sites difference MODERATELY WELL DRAINED Pomello fine sand, 0-2% 0.95% 1 0 1 2.44% 1.49% Total 0.95% 1 0 1 2.44% 1.49% POORLY DRAINED Basinger fine sand, 0-2% 5.79% 0 0.00% -5.79% Boca fine sand, 0-2% 1.52% 2 2 4.88% 3.35% Ft. Drum and Malabar, high, fine sands 1.34% 0 0.00% -1.34% Hallandale and boca fine sands 0.06% 0 0.00% -0.06% Hallandale fine sand, 0-2% 0.04% 0 0.00% -0.04% Hilolo, Jupiter, and Margate fine sands 0.80% 6 6 14.63% 13.83% Holo aw fine sand, 0-2% 4.44% 2 2 4.88% 0.44% Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum is 0.25% 0 0.00% -0.25% Immokalee fine sand, 0-2% 19.19% 1 1 2.44% -16.75% Malabar fine sand, 0-2% 4.50% 4 4 9.76% 5.26% M akka fine sand, 0-2% 1.44% 0 0.00% -1.44% Oldsmar fine sand, 0-2% 12.71% 0 0.00% -12.71% Oldsmar fine sand, is 0.99% 1 1 2.44% 1.45% Pennsuco silt loam 0.06% 0 0.00% -0.06% Pineda and Riviera fine sands 3.67% 2 1 1 4 9.76% 6.08% Pineda fine sand, is 0.23% 0 0.00% -0.23% Riviera fine sand, is 0.65% 0 0.00% -0.65% Riviera, Is -Copeland fine sands 1.02% 1 1 2.44% 1.42% Tuscawilla fine sand 4.30% 2 2 4 9.76% 5.45% Wabasso fine sand, 0-2% 5.40% 2 2 4.88% -0.52% POORLY DRAINED Total 68.41% 22 4 1 0 27 65.85% -2.55% ACl 4-4 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 DRAINAGE/Soil Type, % slopes % of Area 1 2 3 4 Total % of Sites difference VERY POORLY DRAINED Boca, Riviera, Is, and Copeland fine sands, de ressional de r 7.11% 3 1 4 9.76% 2.64% Chobee, Is, and Dania mucks, der 0.21 % 0 0.00% -0.21 % Chobee, Winder, and Gator soils, der 6.94% 1 1 2 4.88% -2.06% Holo aw and Okeelanta soils, der 1.19% 0 0.00% -1.19% Winder, Riviera, Is, and Chobee soils, de r 13.13% 2 2 4 9.76% -3.38% Total 28.59% 6 4 0 0 10 24.39% -4.20% OTHER Urban land 0.01 % 0 0.00% -0.01% Urban land-Holo aw-Basin er complex 0.01% 0 0.00% -0.01% Urban land-Immokalee-Oldsmar, Is, complex 0.95% 0 0.00% -0.95% Urban land-Matlacha-Boca complex 0.02% 0 0.00% -0.02% Water 1.07% 3 3 7.32% 6.25% Total 2.05% 3 0 0 3 7.32% 5.27% Grand Total 100.00% 32 8 1 0 41 100.00% 0.00% This portion of Collier County is damp and soggy as evidenced by the fact that 68% of the soils are poorly drained and another 29% of the soils are very poorly drained. The moderately well drained soils do not even make up 1% of the area. Water and urban land underlie the remaining portion (2%) of the study area. Those soils that have a higher percentage of sites as compared to area (2% or greater) are marked in red on the table, while those that seem less likely to be used (-2% or less) are marked in blue. There are six preferred soil types; in order of preference are: Hilolo, Jupiter, and Margate fine sands; Pineda and Riviera fine sands; Tuscawilla fine sand; Malabar fine sand 0-2% slopes; Boca fine sand, 0-2% slopes; and Boca, Riviera, limestone substratum, and Copeland sands, depressional. The last soil type may have been chosen as a water hole as opposed as a camping area. There are three soils that appear to have been avoided. In order of avoidance, they area Immokalee fine sand, 0-2% slopes; Oldsmar fine sand, 0-2% slopes; and Basinger fine sand, 0-2% slopes. Soils within the APE have low correlations with sites, especially the Immokalee fine sands that characterize the northern portion of the APE. The Boca -Riviera with limestone substratum and the Winder -Riviera also have low correlations with sites. However, the APE is less that one kilometer from Lake Trafford, a large fresh water source. Additionally, there are numerous precontact habitation and burial sites within one mile (1.6km). Based on this analysis the APE is considered to be of moderate probability for the discovery of indigenous sites. 4.3 Historic/Architectural Considerations Historical background research, including a review of the FMSF and NRHP, indicated that no historic resources are located within or adjacent to the APE. The Collier County Property Appraiser data indicated no historic structures within the APE, and none were evident on the aerial photos of the area (Skinner 2022; USDA 1944, 1958, 1963, 1980). ACl 4-5 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 4.4 Field Methodology The FDHR's Module Three, Guidelines for Use by Historic Professionals, indicates that the first stage of archaeological field survey is a reconnaissance of the project area to "ground truth," or ascertain the validity of the predictive model (FDHR 2003). During this part of the survey, the researcher assesses whether the initial predictive model needs adjustment based on disturbance or conditions such as constructed features (i.e., parking lots, buildings, etc.), underground utilities, landscape alterations (i.e., ditches and swales, mined land, dredged and filled land, agricultural fields), or other constraints that may affect the archaeological potential. Additionally, these Guidelines indicate that non-systematic "judgmental" testing may be appropriate in urbanized environments where pavement, utilities, and constructed features make systematic testing unfeasible; in geographically restricted areas such as proposed pond sites; or within project areas that have limited high and moderate probability zones, but where a larger subsurface testing sample may be desired. While predictive models are useful in determining preliminary testing strategies in a broad context, it is understood that testing intervals may be altered due to conditions encountered by the field crew at the time of survey. Archaeological field survey methods consisted of surface reconnaissance combined with systematic subsurface testing. Shovel tests were placed at 25 in intervals in high probability areas near previously recorded sites, 50 in intervals in moderate probability areas, and 100 in intervals in low probability areas within the APE. An additional seven test pits were conducted judgmentally near the wetlands. All tests measured approximately 50 cm (19.6 inch) in diameter by 100 cm (39.4 inch) depth, unless impeded by water intrusion or impenetrable substrate. Soils were screened through .64 cm (1/4 inch) mesh hardware cloth. The location of all tests was recorded using the data collection application by ESRI, Collector, with a Trimble R2 with sub -meter module GNSS receiver. Historic field methodology consisted of a survey of the project APE to determine the location of all historic resources believed to be 50 years of age or older, and to ascertain if any resources within the project APE could be eligible for listing in the NRHP. If found, an in-depth study of each identified historic resource would have been conducted, photographs taken, and the information needed for the completion of FMSF forms gathered. In addition to architectural descriptions, each historic resource would have been reviewed to assess style, historic context, condition, and potential NRHP eligibility. 4.5 Unexpected Discoveries Occasionally, archaeological deposits, subsurface features or unmarked human remains are encountered during the course of development, even though the project area may have previously received a thorough and professionally adequate cultural resources assessment. Such events are rare, but they do occur. In the event that human remains are encountered during the course of development, the procedures outlined in Chapter 872, FS must be followed. However, it was not anticipated that such sites would be found during this survey. In the event such discoveries are made during the development process, all activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery will be suspended, and a professional archaeologist will be contacted to evaluate the importance of the discovery. The area will be examined by the archaeologist, who, in consultation with staff of the Florida SHPO, will determine if the discovery is significant or potentially significant. In the event the discovery is found to be not significant, the work may immediately resume. If, on the other hand, the discovery is found to be significant or potentially significant, then development activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery will continue to be suspended until such time as a mitigation plan, acceptable to SHPO, is developed and implemented. ACI 4-6 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Development activities may then resume within the discovery area, but only when conducted in accordance with the guidelines and conditions of the approved mitigation plan. 4.6 Laboratory Methods/Curation No cultural materials were recovered; therefore, no lab methods were utilized. Curation of project files (i.e., background research, field notes, photos, etc.) will be at Archaeological Consultants, Inc. in Sarasota (ACI Project No. P22022), unless the client requests otherwise. ACI 4-7 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 5.0 SURVEY RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Archaeological Results Archaeological field survey included both ground surface reconnaissance and the excavation of 81 shovel test pits (Figure 5.1). No cultural materials were collected from any shovel tests during the survey. Tests within and around the boundaries of the previously recorded sites were shovel tested at 25 m intervals. Despite the high probability testing no evidence of these sites was recovered, there was no variation in stratigraphy nor were any artifact found. The lack of evidence of 8CR00725 and 8CR00704 supports the ACH (1991) position that these may be natural mounds. The remainder of the APE was tested at 50 m and 100 m intervals based on soil type and wetland proximity. There were several notable stratigraphies within the APE. • Southeast: 0-20 centimeters below surface (cmbs) dark gray sand; 20-60 cmbs pale brown sand; 60-100 grayish brown clay (Photo 5.1). • Northeast: 0-20 cmbs dark gray sand, 20-100 cmbs gray sand (Photo 5.2). • Disturbed Southern Hammock: 0-30 cmbs dark brown sand/muck; water at 30 cmbs (Photo 5.3). • Southwest: 0-100 cmbs gray sand (Photo 5.4) • Northwest: 0-20 cmbs dark gray sand, 20-50 cmbs gray sand, 50-60 cmbs dark brown sand, 60-90 cmbs light brown sand, 90-100 cmbs gray clay (Photo 5.5) Photo 5.1. Typical stratigraphy in southeast areas of Photo 5.2. Stratigraphy in the northeast area of the the APE. APE. Photo 5.3. High water table in center of APE. + F Photo 5.4. Stratigraphy in southwest portion of the APE. ACI 5-1 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Figure 5.1. Location of shovel tests and archaeological sites within the APE. ACl 5-2 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 A reasonable and good faith effort was made per the regulation 36 CFR § 800.4(b) (1) (Advisory Council on Historic Preservation n.d.) to test all areas of the project APE. Photo 5.5. Stratigraphy in the northwest area of the APE. 5.2 Historical Results Historical background research, including a review of the FMSF and NRHP, indicated that no historic resources are located within or adjacent to the APE. The Collier County Property Appraiser data indicated no historic structures within the APE, and none were evident on the aerial photos of the area (Skinner 2022; USDA 1944, 1958, 1963, 1980). The field investigations confirmed the absence of historic resources within the APE. 5.3 Conclusions Based on the background research and survey results, including the excavation of 81 shovel tests on this 168.4-acre parcel, no evidence of the previously recorded sites was encountered, therefore no changes were made to existing site file forms. No evidence of new sites or historical resources was recovered. It is the opinion of ACI that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on any cultural resources that are listed, determined eligible, or that appear potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. ACI 5-3 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 6.0 REFERENCES CITED Almy, Maranda M. 1978 The Archaeological Potential of Soil Survey Reports. The Florida Anthropologist 31(3):75-91. 2001 The Cuban Fishing Ranchos of Southwest Florida 1600-1850s. Unpublished Honors Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville Almy, Marion M. and George M. Luer 1993 Guide to the Prehistory of Historic Spanish Point in Southwest Florida. Gulf Coast Heritage Association, Sarasota. Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) 1992 Mapping of Areas of Historical/Archaeological Probability in Collier County, Florida. Manuscript on file, Archaeological Consultants, Inc., Sarasota. 1999 Update Historic/Archaeological Probability Maps and Data Sheets for Collier County Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 2014a Cultural Resources Avoidance Model Nobles Grade 3D Seismic Survey Big Cypress National Preserve Collier County, Florida. ACI, Sarasota. 2014b Cultural Resources Predictive Model Tellus 3D Seismic Survey Collier and Hendry Counties, Florida. ACI, Sarasota. ART Engineering 2004 Lake Trafford Critical Restoration Project — Aquascan Radar Survey Report, Collier County, Florida. Manuscript on file, Division of Historical Resources, Tallahassee. Austin, Robert J. 1987 An Archaeological Site Inventory and Zone Management Plan for Lee County, Florida. Janus Research, Inc., Tampa. MS# 1561. 1995 Yat Kitischee: A Prehistoric Coastal Hamlet 100 B.C.-A.D. 1200. Manuscript on File, Janus Research, Tampa. Austin, Robert J. and M. Russo 1989 Limited Excavations at the Catfish Creek Site (8S0608), Sarasota, Florida. Manuscript on File, Janus Research, Tampa. Barron Collier Company 2007 Hogan Conceptual Master Plan (prepared by WilsonMiller) and Hogan Land Use Tabulations. December 18. Bellomo, Randy V. and Charles Fuhrmeister 1991 1992 Update of an Archaeological and Zone Management Plan for Lee County, Florida. Janus Research, Inc., Tampa. MS# 3145. Bradbury, Alford G. and E. Storey Hallock 1962 A Chronology of Florida Post Offices. Handbook 2. The Florida Federation of Stamp Clubs. ACI 6-1 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Bruton, Q. G. and D.E. Bailey 1984 Plant City: Its Origins and History. Hunter Publishing Co. Fort Lee, N.J., Hunter Publishing Co. Buchheister, Carl W. n.d. "The Acquisition and Development of the Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary, 1952-1967". http://www.corkscrew.audubon.org/InformationBuchheister.html Bullen, Ripley P. 1975 A Guide to the Identification of Florida Projectile Points. Kendall Books, Gainesville. 1978 Tocobaga Indians and the Safety Harbor Culture. In Tacachale: Essays on the Indians of Florida and Southeastern Georgia During the Historic Period, ed. J.T. Milanich and S. Proctor. Gainesville, University Press of Florida. Carbone, Victor 1983 Late Quaternary Environment in Florida and the Southeast. The Florida Anthropologist 36 (1-2):3-17. Carr, Robert S. and John G. Beriault 1984 Prehistoric Man in South Florida. In Environments of South Florida: Present and Past, Revised Edition, edited by P.J. Gleason, pp. 1-14. Miami Geological Society Memoir 2, Miami. Carter, B.C. and J. S. Dunbar 2006 Early Archaic Archaeology. First Floridians and Last mastodons: The Page-Ladson Site in the Aucilla River, ed. S.D. Webb. New York, Springer. Clausen, Carl J., A. D. Cohen, Cesare Emiliani, J. A. Holman, and J. J. Stipp 1979 Little Salt Spring, Florida: A Unique Underwater Site. Science: 203:609-614. Collier County Museum 2010a Everglade: New Directions. Collier County Museum, Naples. http://colliennuseums.com/history/everglades_ new _directions.php 2010b One Man's Vision: Barron Gift Collier. Collier County Museum, Naples. http://colliermuseums.com/history/barron_Collier.php Covington, James W. 1958 Exploring the Ten Thousand Islands: 1838. Tequesta 18:7-13. 1961 The Armed Occupation Act of 1842. Florida Historical Quarterly 40(1):41-53. Daniel, Randy and Michael Wisenbaker 1987 Harney Flats. Baywood Publishing Company, Farmingdale. Davis, George B., Leslie J. Perry, Joseph W. Kirkley 1891-1895 "The Official Military Map of the Civil War", compiled by Capt. Calvin D. Cowles, 23' Infantry. Government Printing Office, Reprinted by Fairfax Press, New York. Davis, J.H. 1980 General Map of Natural Vegetation of Florida. Collection: Circular 1980. Agriculture Experiment Station, University of Florida. ACI 6-2 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Delcourt, P. A., and H. R. Delcourt 1981 Vegetation Maps for Eastern North America: 40,000 yr. B.P. to the Present. In Geobotany II, edited by R. C. Romans. Plenum Publishing Corporation. Dickel, David N. 1991 An Archaeological Survey of Collier County, Florida. AHC Technical Report 38. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Davie. MS# 2934. Doran, Glen H. 2002 Windover, Multidisciplinary Investigations of an Early Archaic Period Cemetery. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Drew, Richard D. 1985 An Ecological Characterization of the Caloosahatchee River/Big Cypress Watershed. Electronic Version, State University System of Florida. Original Manuscript Published in 1985 by Minerals Management Services, Metairie. Electronic version available online, http://fulltext I O. fcla.edu/cgi/t/text/textidx?c=feol&idno=UF00000112&format=pdf Dunbar, James S. 2006 Pleistocene -Early Holocene Climate Change: Chronostratigraphy and Geoclimate of the Southeast US. In First Floridians and Last Mastodons: The Page-Ladson Site in the Aucilla River. Edited by S. David Webb, pp. 103-155. Springer, The Netherlands. 2016 Paleoindian Societies of the Coastal Southeast. Gainesville, University Press of Florida. Dunbar, James S. and P.K. Vojnovski 2007 Early Floridians and Late Mega -Mammals: Some Technological and Dietary Evidence from Four North Florida Paleoindian Sites. In Foragers of the Terminial Pleistocene in North America, ed. R.B. Walker and B.N. Driskell. Omaha, University of Nebraska Press. Dunn, Hampton 1989 Back Home: A History of Citrus County, Florida. Citrus County Historical Society, Inverness. 2nd edition. Fairbridge, Rhodes W. 1984 The Holocene Sea Level Record in South Florida. In Environments of South Florida: Present and Past II. Edited by Patrick J. Gleason, pp. 427-436. Miami Geological Society, Coral Gables. Farr, G. 2006 A Reevaluation of Bullen's Typology for Preceramic Projectile Points. M.A. Thesis, On File, Florida State University. Faught, M.K 2004 The Underwater Archaeology of Paleolandscapes, Apalachee Bay, Florida. American Antiquity 69(2):275-289. ACI 6-3 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Faught, M.K. and J. Donoghue 1997 Marine Inundated Archaeological Sites and Paleofluvial Systems: Examples from a Kart -controlled Continental Shelf Setting in Apalachee Bay, Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Geoarchaeology 12:417-458. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 1999 Project Development and Environmental Manual Part 2, Chapter 12, "Archaeological and Historical Resources." On file, FDOT, Tallahassee. Florida Division of Forestry 2002 www.fl-dof.com Florida Division of Historical Resources (FDHR) n.d. Florida Historical Markers Program: Sunniland Oil Field. http://dhr.dos.state.fl.usibhp/markers/markers.cf n?ID=collier, Accessed November 5, 2003. 2003 Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual. On file, Florida Division of Historical Resources, Tallahassee. Florida Natural Areas Inventory and Florida Department of Natural Resources 1990 Guide to the Natural Communities of Florida. Tallahassee. Florida Parks Service n.d. Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve. www.abfla.com/parks/Fakahatchee Strand/fakahatchee.html. Accessed November 10, 2003. Florida Preservation Services n.d. Collier County Historic Survey. Manuscript on file, Florida Preservation Services, Tallahassee. 1985 Collier County Historic Survey. Manuscript on file, Florida Division of Historical Resources, Tallahassee. Florida Preservation Services 1986 Historic/Architectural Survey of Collier County, Florida. Manuscript on File, FPS, St. Augustine. Fontaneda, Hernando d'Escalante 1944 Memoir of Do. d'Escalante Fontaneda respecting Florida. Written in Spain ca. 1575. Translated by Buckingham Smith, edited by D.O. True. University of Miami and Historical Association of Southern Florida, Miami. Gleason, Patrick and Peter Stone 1994 Age, Origin, and Landscape Evolution of the Everglades Peatland. In Everglades: The Ecosystem and It's Resotrations, ed. S.M. Davis and J.C. Ogden. St. Lucie Press Gleason, Patrick J., Arthur D. Cohen, William Smith, H. Kelly Brooks, Peter A. Stone, Robert Goodrick, and William Spackman, Jr. 1984 The Environmental Significance of Holocene Sediments from the Everglades and Saline Tidal Plain. In Environments of South Florida: Present and Past IT Edited by Patrick J. Gleason, pp. 297-351. Miami Geological Society, Coral Gables. ACI 6-4 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Goggin, John M. n.d. The Archaeology of the Glades Area, Southern Florida. Manuscript on File, Southeastern Archaeology Center, National Park Service, Tallahassee. Griffin, John W. 1988 The Archaeology of Everglades National Park: A Synthesis. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee. Grismer, Karl H. 1946 The Story of Sarasota. Florida Grower Press, Tampa. Guthrie, S.W. 1974 Land of Promise, Land of Change: An Examination of the Population of Hillsborough County, Florida. M.A. Thesis, Emory University. Hann, John 2003 Indians of Central and South Florida, 1513-1763. . University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Hutchinson, B. 2005 Flowing Along through Time. Sarasota Herald Tribune, February 27. Ives, Lieutenant J.C. 1856 Military Map of the Peninsula of Florida South of Tampa Bay. U.S. War Department, Washington D.C. 2005 Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the FPL Collier -Orange River #3 230 KV Transmission Line: Segment E, Collier County. Manuscript on file, Janus Research, Knetsch, Joe 2008 Fear and Anxiety on the Florida Frontier: Articles on the Second Seminole War. Seminole Wars Foundation. Kohler, T.A. 1991 The Demise of Weedon Island and Post-Weedon Island Cultural Stability in Non- Missippianized North Florida. In Stability, Transformation, and Variation: The Late Woodland Southeast, ed. M. Nassaney and C.R. Cobb. New York, Plenum Press. Luer, G.M. et al 1987 The Myakkahatchee Site (8SO0397), A Large Multi -Period Inland from the Shore Site in Sarasota County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 40(2):137-153. Luer, G.M. and Marion Almy 1982 A Definition of Manasota Culture. The Florida Anthropologist 35(1):34-58. Mahon, John K. 1985 History of the Second Seminole War 1835-1842. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Revised edition. Mahon, John K. and Brent Weisman 1996 Florida's Seminole and Miccosukee Peoples. In The New History of Florida, ed. Michael Gannon. Gainesville, University Press of Florida. ACl 6-5 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Marth, D. 1973 Yesterday's Sarasota. E.A. Seeman Publishing, Inc. Matthews, J.S. 1997 Journey to Centennial Sarasota. Sesquicentennial Productions, Inc. McCarthy J. and G. Dame 1983 A History of the Myakka River, Sarasota County, Florida. Manuscript on File, Sarasota County History Center, Sarasota. Milanich, Jerald T. 1994 Archaeology of Precolumbian Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. 1998 Florida's Indians from Ancient Times to the Present. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Milanich, Jerald T. and Charles H. Fairbanks 1980 Florida Archaeology. Academic Press, New York. Nash, Roy 1930 Survey of the Seminole Indians of Florida. Office of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. http://ufdc.ufl.edu/FS00000029/00001/3j. National Archives n.d. Historical Information Relating to Military Posts and Other Installations ca. 1700- 1900, Roll 2 Volumes C-E. National Archives Microfilm Publication, Microcopy No. 661. National Archives and Records Service, Washington. Neill, Wilfred T. 1964 Trilisa Pond, An Early Site in Marion County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 17:187-200. Parsons, Timothy A. 2021 Letter to Southwest Florida Water Management District, November 1. RE: DHR Project File No.: 2021-6194, Application No.: 832149, Parkview Multi -family Blount Development at Millennium Park, Sumter County. FDHR, Tallahassee. Pettengill, G.W. 1952 The Story of the Florida Railroads 1834-1903. Bulletin 1952. Manuscript on File, The Railway and Locomotive Historical Society. Piper, Harry et al 1982 Cultural Responses to Stress: Patterns Observed in American Indian Burials of the Second Seminole War. Southeastern Archaeology 1(2). Purdy, Barbara 1981 Florida's Prehistoric Stone Tool Technology. Gainesville, University Press of Florida. Robinson, E.L. 1928 History of Hillsborough County. The Record Company Printers. ACl 6-6 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Russo, Michael 1994a A Brief Introduction to the Study of Archaic Mounds in the Southeast. Southeastern Archaeology 13(2):89-92. 1994b Why We Don't Believe in Archaic Ceremonial Mounds and Why We Should: The Case from Florida. Southeastern Archaeology 13(2):93-108. Sassaman, Kenneth E. 2003 New AMS Dates on Orange Fiber -Tempered Pottery from the Middle St. John's Valley and Their Implications for Culture History in Northeast Florida. Florida Anthropologist 56(1):5-13 2008 The New Archaic, It Ain't What It Used to Be. The SAA Archaeological Record 8 (5): 6-8. Schwadron, Margo 2002 Archaeological Survey of the New Addition Lands, Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida. Manuscript on File: Southeastern Archaeology Center, National Park Service, Talahassee. Seminole Tribe of Florida n.d. "Survival in the Swamp." www.seminoletribe.com (November 11, 2003). Shofner, Jerrell H. 1995 History ofBrevard County. Brevard County Historical Commission, Stuart. Smith, Buckingham 1944 Memoir of Do. d'Escalante Fontaneda Respecting Florida. Written in Spain about the Year 1575. (English translation by Smith. Edited by David O. True). University of Miami and Historical Association of Florida, Miami. Smith, Greg C. 2008 Cultural Resources Overview and Survey Strategy: Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. New South Associates, Stone Mountain, GA. Stanford, D. et al 2005 Paleamerican Origins: Models, Evidence, and Future Directions. In Paleamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, ed. R. Bonnichsen et al. Center for the Study of the First Americans. State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection 1872 Field Notes. Volume 222. n.d. Tract Book Volume 25:48. State Mapping Office 1993 General Highway Map, Collier County, Florida. Tampa Tribune 1955 "Pioneer Florida", January 2. ACI 6-7 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Tebeau, Charlton W. 1966 Florida's Last Frontier: The History of Collier County. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables. 1971 A History of Florida. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables. Tebeau, Charlton W. and Ruby Leach Carson 1965 Florida From Indian Trail to Space Age. Southern Publishing Company, Delray Beach. Tischendorf, A.P. 1954 Florida and the British Investor 1880-1914. Florida Historical Quartertly 33(1): 120- 129. True, David O., Ed. 1944 Memoir of D. Escalante Fontaneda Respecting Florida. University of Miami and South Florida Historical Society, Miami. U.S. Census 2008 State and County QuickFacts: Collier County, Florida. Online, http://quickfacts.census.gov/gfd/states/12/12001.html. Last revised 1/2/08. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1954 Soil Survey Collier County, Florida. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. 1998 Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. United States Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangle Maps 1958a Corkscrew SE, Fla. Photorevised 1973. 1958b Corkscrew SW, Fla. Photorevised 1987. Watts, William A. 1969 A Pollen Diagram from Mud Lake, Marion County, North-Central Florida. Geological Society ofAmerica Bulletin 80:631-642. 1971 Post Glacial and Interglacial Vegetational History of Southern Georgia and Central Florida. Ecology 51:676-690. 1975 A Late Quaternary Record of Vegetation from Lake Annie, South -Central Florida. Geology 3:344-346. Watts, William and B.C.S. Hansen 1988 Environments in Florida in the Late Wisconsin and Holocene. In Wet Site Archaeology, ed B.A. Purdy. Telford, PA, Telford Press 1994 Pre -Holocene and Holocene Pollen Records of Vegetation History for the Florida Peninsula and the Climatic Implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 109:163-167. Watts, William et al 1996 Mid -Holocene Forest History of Florida and the Coastal Plain of Georgia and South Carolina. In Archaeology of the Mid -Holocene Southeast, ed. K. E. Sassaman and D.G. Anderson. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. ACI 6-8 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Webb, S.D. 2006 Mastodon Tusk Recovery. In First Floridians and Last Mastodons: The Page -Ladson Site in the Aucilla River, ed. S.D. Webb. New York, Springer. Webb, S.D. and J.S. Dunbar 2006 Carbon Dates. In First Floridians and Last Mastodons: The Page-Ladson Site in the Aucilla River, ed. S.D. Webb. New York, Springer. Weeks, Don and Christine Bates 1998 "The Big Cypress Hydrology Program." Park Science, Volume 18(1). Also www.nature.nps.gov/parksci/VoII8(1)/13weeks.htin. Widmer, Randolph J. 1988 The Evolution of the Calusa: A Non -Agricultural Chiefdom on the Southwest Florida Coast. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa and London. Zilles, J. 1976 A History of Sarasota County Agriculture Fair Association and Sarasota County Historical Society. Manuscript on File, Sarasota. ACI 6-9 CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 APPENDIX A Survey Log ACI CRAS Williams Farms PUD, Collier Co. P22022 Page 1 Ent D (FMSF only) Survey Log Sheet Survey # (FMSF only) Florida Master Site File Version 5.0 3119 Consult Guide to the Survey Log Sheet for detailed instructions. Survey Project (name and project phase) Williams Farms PUD, Phase I report Title (exactly as on title page) Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of Williams Farms Planned Urban Development (PUD), Collier County, Florida Report Authors (as on title page) 1. Maranda Kles 3. 2.Jean Louise Lammie 4. Publication Year 2022 Number of Pages in Report (do not include site forms) A 'ubllcatlon Information (Give series, number in series, publisher and city. For article or chapter, cite page numbers. Use the style of American Antiquity.) kCI (2022) Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Williams Farm in Collier County, Florida. Conducted for J.R. Evans Engineering, LLC, Estero by ACI, Sarasota. P22022 Supervisors of Fieldwork (even if same as author) Names Kles, Maranda Affiliation of Fieldworkers: organization Archaeological Consultants Inc 0 City Sarasota Key Words/Phrases (Don't use county name, or common words like archaeology, structure, survey, architecture, etc.) 1. 3. 5. 7. 2. 4. 6. 8. Survey Sponsors (corporation, government unit, organization, or person funding fieldwork) Name J.R. Evans Engineering, LLC Organization AddresslPhonaIE-mail 9351 Corkscrew Road STE 201 Estero, FL 3392E Recorder of Log Sheet Jean Louise Lammie Is this survey or project a continuation of a previous project? ❑x No ❑Yes: Date Log Sheet Completed 3-4-2022 Previous survey #s (FMSF only) Counties (select every county in which field survey was done; attach additional sheet if necessary) 1. Collier 0 3. 5. 2. 4. 6. USGS 1:24,000 Map Names/Year of Latest Revision (attach additional sheet if necessary) 1. Name IMMOKALEE Year 1958 4. Name Year 2. Name Year 5. Name Year 3. Name Year 6. Name Year Fieldwork Dates: Start 2-21-2022 End 2-24-2022 Total Area Surveyed (fill in one) hectares Number of Distinct Tracts or Areas Surveyed If Corridor (fill in one for each) Width: meters feet Length: kilometers HR6E066R0319, effective 0512016 Florida Master Site File I Div. of Historical Resources I R.A. Gray Bldg 1500 S Bronough St., Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Rule 1A-46.001, F.A.C. Phone 850.245.6440, Fax 850.245.6439, Email: SiteFile@dos.myflorida.com 168.00 acres miles Page 2 Survey Log Sheet Survey # Types of Survey (select all that apply) Oarchaeological Oarchitectural Ohistoricallarchival ❑damage assessment ❑monitoring report ❑other(describe): ❑underwater Scope/intensity/Procedures q=81;Shovei tests were placed at 25 m intervals in high probability areas near previously recorded Sites, 50 m intervals in moderate probability areas, and 100 m intervals in low probability areas within the APE. Preliminary Methods (select as many as apply to the project as a whole) ❑Florida Archives (Gray Building) ❑library research- coca/public Olocal property or tax records Oother historic maps ❑ LIDAR ❑Florida Photo Archives (Gray Building) ❑library -special collection Onewspaper files Osoils maps or data ❑other remote sensing OSite File property search OPublic Lands Survey (maps at DEP) Oliterature search Owindshield survey OSite File survey search ❑local informant(s) OSanborn Insurance maps Oaerial photography ❑other (describe): Archaeological Methods (select as many as apply to the project as a whole) ❑Check here if NO archaeological methods were used. ❑surface collection, controlled ❑shovel test -other screen size ❑block excavation (at least 2x2 m) ❑metal detector ❑surface collection, uncontrolled ❑water screen ❑soil resistivity ❑other remote sensing Oshovel test-114"screen ❑porthole tests ❑magnetometer ❑pedestrian survey ❑shovel test-118" screen ❑auger tests ❑side scan sonar ❑unknown ❑shovel test 1116"screen ❑coring ❑ground penetrating radar (GPR) ❑shovel test-unscreened ❑test excavation (at least 1 x2 m) ❑LIDAR ❑other (describe): HlstoricallArchitectural Methods (select as many as apply to the project as a whole) ❑Check here if NO historicallarchitectural methods were used. Obuilding permits Odemolition permits ❑neighbor interview [I subdivision maps Ocommercial permits Owindshield survey ❑occupant interview Otax records ❑interior documentation Olocal property records ❑occupation permits ❑unknown ❑other (describe): Resource Significance Evaluated? ❑Yes ONo Count of Previously Recorded Resources Count of Newly Recorded Resources List Previously Recorded Site ID#s with Site File Forms Completed (attach additional pages if necessary) List Newly Recorded Site ID#s (attach additional pages if necessary) Site Forms Used: ❑Site File Paper Forms OSite File PDF Forms Origin of Report: Type of Document: REQUIRED: Attach Map of Survey or Project Area Boundary ❑872 ❑Public Lands ❑UW ❑1 A32 # ❑Academic ❑Grant Project # ❑Compliance Review: CRAT # ❑Archaeological Survey ❑HistoricallArchitectural Survey ❑Marine Survey ❑Cell Tower CRAI ❑Overview ❑Excavation Report ❑Multi -Site Excavation Report ❑Structure Detailed Report ❑Desktop Analysis ❑MPS ❑MRA ❑TG ❑Other: Document Destination: Plottable Projects ❑Contract ❑Avocational ❑Monitoring Report ❑Library, Hist. or Archival Doc Plotability: 0 HRBE066110718, effective 0512016 Florida Master Site File I Div. of Historical Resources I R.A. Gray Bldg 1500 S Bronough St., Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Rule 1A-46.001, F.A.C. Phone 850.245.6440, Fax 850.245.6439, Email: SiteFile@dos.myflorida.com - APE _ T - - .r. . _ — w � ra 46 5 :7 S' Trader Par,. 1 - 0.25- = 0.5 Miles 4;M13.National`_Geographic.Society; i-cubed-University of 0 0.5 1 South Florida. County of Collier, FDEP, Esri, HERE. Garmin, SafeGraph, Kilometers 'GeoTechnologies, Inc., METI/NASA, USGS. EPA. NPS, US Census Bureau: -USDA. USGS Immokalee Williams Farm Property Township 46 South, Range 28 East, Section 36; Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Section 31 USGS Immokalee Collier County, Florida Immokalee Water & Sewer District 1020 Sanitation Road Immokalee, Florida 34142 (239)658-3630 FAX (239) 658-3634 Immokalee Water & Sewer District DATE: October 12, 2021 COLLIER COUNTY TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFICE OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT UTILITY PROVIDER 2800 N HORSESHOE DRIVE other than Collier NAPLES FL 33942 County Utilities To Whom It May Concern: This letter is certification that Immokalee Water & Sewer District, 1020 Sanitation Road, Immokalee, FL 34142 as of October 12, 2021, has the plant capacities to provide water and sewer services to the property and owner(s) of record noted below: Owner(s) of Record: JAMES E WILLIAMS JR TRUST Parcel ID/Description of Propelty: 00057320005 (96.97 acres) 00072520000 (56.86 acres) The District is modeling the existing wastewater collection system to identify improvements, if any, may be required for the approved development. Please contact me at 239-658-3630 if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, C:�= �� G��- Sarah Catala, Executive Director Immokalee Water and Sewer District 1020 Sanitation Road Immokalee, FL 34142 Phone: 239.658.3630 Mobile: 239.651.9990 Email: SarahCatalaCla iw-sd.com Web: www.iw-sd.com Excellence in Quality & Service! DEVIATION REQUESTS AND JUSTIFICATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N, which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the internal streets that include public utilities. Justification: The Wright of way will include 10' travel lanes, curb and gutter, a 5' sidewalk and significant additional area for landscaping and utilities. The cross section for the Wright of way is shown on Page 2 of the master concept plan. The design of the road is more conducing to a residential neighborhood street where travel speeds are slow. The smaller right of way adds to the character of a quiet residential street. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project where abutting an existing public roadway, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination. Justification: The proposed additional wall height is for the perimeter wall only and not for use with individual homes. Along the perimeter the wall can be designed to not impeded any lines of sight for vehicles entering or exiting the community. The additional wall height add to the privacy of the residential community and will allow the development to attract increased value homes to the Immokalee urban area, to the benefit of the entire community. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC 3.05.07 A.S. which requires that Preservation areas be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow for an access road to bisect the preservation area to connect the property to the south. Justification: The subject property is part of a larger ranch that is approximately 2,000 acres in area. The portion of the property that is proposed for development is the predominately upland area north of Camp Keais Strand. The remainder of the ranch includes portions of Camp Keais Strand and ranch land south of the Stand. The wetland areas the strand extend along the entire southern portion of the PUD, except in the location of an existing powerline/road that currently provides access to the remainder of the property. The Master Concept Plan proposes a connection to the remainder of the property in the location with the least possible impact to wetlands and the Stand in order to not landlock the remainder of the property and to provide an interconnect with future development should that be proposed in the future. The proposed road is the least impactful to the environment and therefore provides the best means of access to the remainder property. MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, AND SECTION 31, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS BASED UPON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983, 1990 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83/90) FLORIDA EAST ZONE. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES MEASURED IN FEET. COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GRID COORDINATES. DATUM BASED UPON TIES TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REAL-TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) NETWIORK. �JL•10d1U�:ZeL'AIO►�I111i�1�:1/]►/��►1�►�rl�Y/larla►�uJrrc•1►��y�l�:l�[/IN-rr�►II1P111�:arC1=.YK/1�=•Isral►Y.YIL'�9�7 3. THIS PARCEL LIES IN FLOOD ZONES AS SHOWN, ZONES ARE BASED ON FEMA F.I.R.M. MAP PANEL 12021CO140H, DATED MAY 16, 2012. FLOOD ZONE LINES SHOWN HEREON WERE SCALED FROM THE INDICATED F.I.R.M. MAP PANEL. 4. BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 882446 DATED MAY 6, 2020 AT 11:OOPM. 5. THE STREET ADDRESS IS: XXXXX LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA 34142 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 1988). ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON TIES TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REAL-TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) NETWIORK. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (SCHEDULE W' PARCEL #1 A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL #2 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THE PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING SOUTH OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 890, F/K/A STATE ROAD 850), LESS AND EXCEPT THE LANDS PLATTED AS THE SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS 'ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD - PHASE ONE", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 42, AT PAGES 94 THROUGH 111, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEARINGS REFER TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, AN 80.00 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS BEING S.87*58' 12 "E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AS SURVEYED) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE; THENCE SOUTH 00'21'38" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, 2699.05 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 890 FORMER STATE ROAD 850) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE 284.00 FEET EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 11,419.20 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01`25'30", AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88°2532" EAST 283.99 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 87°42'47" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, 504.33 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 'ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD - PHASE ONE" SUBDIVISION AS PER THE RECORD PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 42 PAGES 94 THROUGH 111 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00°3857" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 1427.20 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 16,24'48" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 557.19 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 86'3635" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 550.83 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 75° 17'53" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 681.46 FEET- THENCE SOUTH 01,15'02" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 570.23 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 42°47'04" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 128.70 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY LINE WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 89°09'18" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, 1937.47 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE SOUTH 89°06'17" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, 2652.93 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 00°26'43" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF SAID SECTION 36, 1596.83 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE NORTH 88°59'49" EAST 2653.46 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, • THENCE NORTH 00'16'34" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, 1286.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 168.028 ACRES MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, REFERENCING THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983, 2011 ADJUSTMENT (NAD 8312011). TOWNSHLP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST TITLE EXCEPTIONS 4. ANY LIEN PROVIDED BY COUNTY ORDINANCE OR BY CHAPTER 159, F.S., IN FAVOR OF ANY CITY, TOWN, VILLAGE OR PORT AUTHORITY, FOR UNPAID SERVICE CHARGES FOR SERVICES BY ANY WATER SYSTEMS, SEWER SYSTEMS OR GAS SYSTEMS SERVING THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND ANY LIEN FOR WASTE FEES IN FAVOR OF ANY COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY. "NOT A SURVEY MATTER" 5. OIL, GAS, MINERAL, OR OTHER RESERVATIONS AS SET FORTH IN DEED BY COLLIER CORPORATION RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 22, PAGE 37 PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. NO DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE AS TO THE CURRENT RECORD OWNER FOR THE INTEREST EXCEPTED HEREIN. "NOT A SURVEY MATTER" 6. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 13, PAGE 407, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. "SHOWN ON SURVEY" 7. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 2311, PAGE 1126, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. "SHOWN ON SURVEY" 8. EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 3948, PAGE 708, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. "SHOWN ON SURVEY" 9 EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 5194, PAGE 2722, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. "SHOWN ON SURVEY" 10.SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE SOLID WASTE MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT, SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 2, AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 5676, PAGE 1130, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO ANY FUTURE ACTS AND/OR ASSESSMENTS THEREOF. "NOT A SURVEY MATTER" 11.RIGHTS OF THE LESSEES UNDER UNRECORDED LEASES. "NOT A SURVEY MATTER" N N O O O O \ O I O Q) Q) Copyright W L� W U CC Y 07 O � 0 0 Y m \ o = o o U z r' M O F1 c) Q) M C) Q- `L. cn Q � � Q Q � cn m O Li N� C� emu, m O �� z .N m M V cn ) O N C Om �- L 00 C rncl- o Q o s N N 0 N O w\ U O Q 00 z 0 O O w a > > w w o Of Of co n O z un O 0 Q u� 0 Q N U r- Ln 0 z 0 0 U 0 0 0 Cr) 00 co w m w� Q Q o z a o o wo =wQ N ~ Q fY � �w0 O �Ow OQ> Q wN w 0 000 J wl Z Q>Qz U W 0 U_ Z J w C� LEGEND 10- = BENCHMARK, SET PK NAIL AND DISK - "LB 6896" A = FOUND PK NAIL - NO IDENTIFICATION = FOUND 518" REBAR - NO IDENTIFICATION 0 = SET 518" REBAR AND CAP - "LB 6896" = FOUND 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT - NO IDENTIFICATION UNLESS NOTED 0 = FOUND 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH ALUMINUM CAP - "PRM LB 1772" (C) = CALCULATED DATA (D) = LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA (M) = FIELD MEASURED DATA (P) = RECORD PLAT DATA MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, AND SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 FAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ""A = SPOT ELEVATION, NAVD 1988 ` L = WOOD UTILITY POLE r1 Clu = CONCRETE UTILITY POLE � \ S�0 0O\A, QUARTER SECTION RES AT BOOK 8PAGEL112E AND NUMEROUS PER PLAT OF Q DEEDS KE TRAFFORD ERTI S LOCATED IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST CENTER OF SECTION 36 PER PLAT OF LAKE TRAFFORD SHORES AND \J`1 NUMEROUS DEEDS IN SECTION 36 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT FOUND 47x4" CONCRETE COLLIER MONUMENT NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 31 CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD 1082980 co z 6 G� T16 Nj 20) NO S�0(\ Om � \�6 S P �O EAST QUARTER CORNER SECTION 36 `0 PER PLAT OF LAKE TRAFFORD SHORES AND NUMEROUS DEEDS IN SECTION 36 10.0' LEE COUNTY I I POINT OF BEGINNING ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE EASEMENT I I 80.0' RIGHT-OF-WAY — — — — — — — — — OFFICIALSCHEDULE B-11 ITEMDS BOOK 9NO. 9E 2722 �290'.(Lyq� 8")— SOUTH I I O� Roo IRGHTEOF-WACTION �EL NEINE LAKEECTION 31TRAFFORD ROAD 1' r 80.0' RIGHT-O-WAY m F z GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 400 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 ft. N_89°16'43" E 2342.30' - — - -—--------- - - _ _--�---_ --__ __ _ L_AI_�E ORD ROAD — — — _ S89°01'10"W 2656.90' (P) - - — _ — — — — � o ---- -----+------ q ° — — — FOUND air 3° CONCRETE MONUMENT IS OFFSET - -- /T - - - - - S89'01 '32"W 2657.97' M 1.00' SOUTH ALONG PROPERLY LINE FROM C 1 SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE �"— S 87'42 47"�E 5_0_b - M CALCULATED PROPERTY CORNER LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD I _ - — — — _ — — — TRACT R-1 (LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD) _—i Ci'— I I - - - - - - - - - - - ______ _ _N 88°45'07" E 2658.02' (C) FOUND 6 X6" DOT RIGHT-OF-WAY I T QUARTER SECTION LINE PER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION QUARTER SECTION LINE PER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EAST QUARTER CORNER SECTION 36 PER I of I I, RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 0356-250 STATE ROAD NO. 850 RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 0356-250 STATE ROAD NO. 850 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPIRATION RIGHT-OF-WAY I MONUMENT (BROKEN) 0.75' FROM CALCULATED of to LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD MAP FOR SECTION 0356-250 SR N0. 850 _PROPERTY CORNERi� � o LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD I / I N . WOOD POST FENCE RUNS 28p (ft B8) I I 2.0' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE \\ -------- --- _ --- - - - - - - I �— U _J UNPLATTED z I \ 60.00' I I I I RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP . p0 z ZONE X" l / / LATERAL DITCH _ 0 N/ / ZONE "X-SHADED" /�0' (�� l / BASE FLOOD ELEVATION LINE T16 S'Na / V Z / / 88) I ELEVATION = 27.0' (NAVD 1988) NJ G�\O\V�j C i G PC� _ O w i �� (TYPICAL) `' `\ O C� V J p ' ' LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC C COOPERATIVE EASEMENT j S0 a �6 7 UNPLATTED OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 13, PAGE 407 �j o �� o �\0\ �� _ _ _ _ _ OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK SCHEDULE B-fl l231TM 10 PAGE 1126 S\ a\\ C SCHEDULE B-11 ITEM NO. 7 Cn 00 y O J g n1�5` FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT EASEMENT p Ui �O PG VV n v OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3948, PAGE 708 (0 �� SCHEDULE B-ll ITM NO. 8 CjO/// rri rri F 0RQ P� C*lz� / O 20.0' LEE COUNTY —4- 26.0' (�� , O N,) ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE EASEMENT 88) F Q P OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5194 PAGE 2722 P SCHEDULE B-II ITEM N0. 9 .�^ 0\S`�\ \ ZONE ':4E" P\VN V I r I _ � I N I UNPLATTED ' I - UNPLATTED \ UNPLATTED l ZONE 'X-SHADED" \ /ZONE "X-SH DED i - -- - - -- -- -- N 89°00'06" E 633.58' (M) I - - - - - 24•o'(ronuD �) / ZONE "X" / ` I N 88'59'49" E 2653.46' (M) WOOD POST FENCE RUNS \ \ \ ZONE 'AH" 3.0' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE \ \ � l \ ' - - - - - - - - - - I 1 z UNPLATTED \ \ Q, ZONE "AE•' Ao SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONE "AH" 5�0 0 RP SO S\X\P 6 �0\0 UNPLATTED SOUTH QUARTER CORNER SECTION 31 UNPLATTED 1 4001 \ / c`^i r \ \ I \ ; r \\ l LAKE TRAFFORD SHORES z UNPLATTED \\ \ (VACANT) \ PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 12 mV \ \ z I N OI \\ I N01'27'30'E 3.45' (P) II \1 22.5' N I \` ) \ � N00'02'31 � 3.43' (M) I I (NAuo aa) �„ I \ I 23.0' (NAuo 'aa) /// N W59 49 E 2653.46 M I I �PC� i `— / - - n \ \ — I Z I QUARTER -QUARTER Q, p I CORNER �/ r 7b _ - - - - - - --- N \ / /' �\ FLOOD ZONE LINE O I /�-------\� - - \ \\ UNPLATTED SUBJECT PROPERTY / , \0� RP I . . S 86°36 35" E 550.83' S 86'52'40" E 550.82' (P) TRACT P-7 -- / a s ` ZONE nE° S 5 332� 681.4 6' 681.541 ------------ ZONE 'AH" \ I I 1 I 1 I I I I \ / ZONE 'AE„ � I I / \ \ S 89*06'17" W 2652.93' (M)-------------- i \ ' Za \P 0 S UNPLATTED \�jC \ 22.5' (NAVD '88) / I cr) 100.0' i i LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE EASEMENT \ OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 13, PAGE 407 I I \ \ RP ` ZONE 'AH" "j N -+ (0� 1 ` - c-) SCHEDULE B-11 ITM NO. 6 OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2311, PAGE 1126 ---Ni I �` c< Cj �` m m SCHEDULE B-II ITEM NO. 7 I \ \ JCS Ov \ S \ I FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT EASEMENT I (� / \ v v I OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3948, PAGE 708 SCHEDULE B-11 ITM NO. 8 I I ZONE 'AH" I I \ ZONE 'AH" \ l I 1 l\ I I II / I ` \\ / ' ZONE 'AH" S 89°09'18" W 1937.47' (M) SOUTHWEST CORNER SECTION 31 �ksl UNPLATTED CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA (M) RADIUS (M) ARC (M) CHORD BEARING (M) CHORD (M) Cl 1 °25'30" 11419.20' 284.00' N88°25'32 "W 283.99' S 42'47'04" E 128.70' (M) S 89'09'18" W 3018.20' (M) �A SOUTHEAST CORNER SECTION 31 CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD 1083004 A j Copyright �" N O r-9 LL_ 0 zNN w mw o= z rn C) Cn Q- `L_ m Q C7 C6 Ln rl hi ro Lu i> NCD V' Ln 00 O s z .N M M V « O CV C Cn (D m `. 00 ai W C � O Q o s N N O N O w� C) (N Q 00 � 11 o7' m 0 z- 0 0 0 w � a > > w w o Of Of N w 0 N o O a w 0 (D) n- 00 a O2 L>`\ a� O N CD O U U) Cf) N U r- LLB 0 z O cn co a_ N U o u� O o C� Q Q U o T j > Q GO 0 N O tl 00 c0 IW _j LLJ Q � o zQa Z N W O = O Q=WQ N ~ Q Q 0 W O w 0- �Q� 0 Q �wN E � Ln 0 000 J z W I QQC/) -C Q > w U_ U U J I- Z W C�