Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 5/23/2023 Item # 9B (Ordinance - Rezoning The Haven at North Naples)
9.B 05/23/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex-parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a rezoning Ordinance for The Haven at North Naples MPUD to allow The Carlisle Assisted Living Facility (group care, care units, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and continuing care retirement communities) with a maximum 0.65 Floor Area Ratio and up to 336 multi -family dwelling units, of which 76 will be rent restricted as affordable, on 27.78+/- acres located southwest of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (PUDZ-PL20220001042) (Companion to item 9A) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above - referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD Rezone (PUDZ) petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The property is 27.78+/- acres located in the southwest quadrant of the Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road intersection. The Carlisle Naples senior living facility is constructed on 17.78 acres at property address 6903 Airport Road North, currently zoned Rural Agricultural (A). Conditional Use approval was granted for the group care use by Resolution 96-405. The proposed MPUD includes an undeveloped 10-acre tract abutting The Carlisle Naples immediately to the south. The petitioner is requesting that the Board approve the rezoning of these properties from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to MPUD- ST/W-4 to be known as The Haven at North Naples MPUD. Conditions of Resolution 96-405 are incorporated as commitments in the MPUD, and a deviation is requested to increase the maximum Floor Area Ratio for Tract A (The Carlisle Naples) from 0.45 to 0.65. With the adoption of these provisions in the MPUD, repeal of Resolution 96-405 is also proposed. The petitioner proposes a Master Plan with two Tracts: - Tract A is 13.21 acres occupied by The Carlisle Naples, a 371,133-square foot senior group housing facility. Proposed maximum zoned height is 40 feet; maximum actual height is 45 feet. - Tract B is 14.57 acres partially occupied by The Carlisle Naples entrance drive and gatehouse. Additional off -site parking for The Carlisle is also proposed, plus a multifamily project with 336 dwelling units. Proposed maximum zoned height is 55 feet (not to exceed 4 stories) and maximum actual height is 60 feet. The proposed density is 12.1 dwelling units per gross acre or 23.06 dwelling units on Tract B alone. The companion Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment (PL20220001043) must be approved and become effective before the rezoning may be found consistent with the GMP. The petitioner proposes to commit 76 units, or 22.6% of the proposed multifamily units on Tract B, as affordable housing. Specifically, 38 units are proposed to be rented to households with income up to and including 100% of the Area Median Income (AMI) and 38 units are to be rented to households with income up to and including 80% of the AMI for Collier County. Details of the affordable housing commitment are provided in Section V of Exhibit F, included in the attached Draft Ordinance. The Development Commitments (PUD Exhibit F, Development Commitments) include that this affordability restriction will remain in place for thirty (30) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limit adjustments may be made annually according to the most recent income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or otherwise by the County. The developer will report annually on the occupancy of income -restricted units as part of the PUD monitoring requirements and the County may monitor on -site and inspect business records relating to affordable housing monitoring and Packet Pg. 49 05/23/2023 9.B compliance. The applicant will satisfy the native preservation requirements off -site with a +1.56-acres of off -site mitigation or with payment in lieu of the LDC. The Master Plan indicates that open space will be 30% of the total site area or 8.33 acres. Considering the single-family homes to the west, the petitioner agreed at the CCPC hearing to provide a minimum setback of 130 feet for multifamily buildings to the rear (western) property line of Tract B. The petitioner clarified in the documentation provided after the CCPC meeting that the 130-foot setback is not intended to apply to single -story garages (not to exceed 20 feet in height) and trash enclosures, which shall be setback no less than 30 feet. The petitioner also has committed to plantings placed on the external side of a concrete block and stucco wall eight feet in height along the western perimeter of Tract B. Two deviations are requested: Deviation 1 is to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.65 instead of 0.45 for Tract A (The Carlisle Naples), and Deviation 2 is to allow an enhanced 10-foot-wide Type A buffer instead of the required 15-foot-wide Type B buffer along the Tract B northern border. FISCAL IMPACT: The rezoning by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by the application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Comprehensive Planning staff identifies that the subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. Maximum eligible residential density is determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre, except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. There is a companion GMP Amendment (PL20220001043) that provides for the requested density. The MPUD rezoning may only be found consistent with the GMP if the GMP Amendment is approved and becomes effective. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard Petition PUDZ-PL20220001042, The Haven at North Naples MPUD, on April 6, 2023, and voted 4-2 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval, subject to three conditions: (1) increasing the rear setback for Tract B to 130 feet (PUD Exhibit B, Table I), (2) including reference to the access connection for emergency vehicles only to the south (PUD Exhibit F.II.C.), and (3) indicating a seven-day pre -notice for affordable housing compliance inspections (PUD Exhibit F.V.C.). All CCPC-recommended conditions have been incorporated in the Ordinance that accompanies this Executive Summary. Commissioner Shea dissented based on the project being too dense and too tall for the neighborhood; Commissioner Schumacher dissented based on the density in relation to the amount of affordable housing provided and recognized the input of the surrounding neighborhood representatives. Packet Pg. 50 9.B 05/23/2023 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site -specific rezone to a Mixed Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for a project which will be known as The Haven at North Naples MPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezoning is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. Criteria for PUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed MPUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with MPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed MPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested MPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions Packet Pg. 51 9.B 05/23/2023 on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air in adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed MPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the MPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. DDP RECOMMENDATION: Approve Petition PUDZ- PL20220001042, The Haven at North Naples MPUD, subject to approval by the BCC of the companion GMPA-PL20220001043 and with an effective date linked to the effective date of the companion GMP Amendment petition. Packet Pg. 52 9.B 05/23/2023 Prepared by: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Growth Management Community Development Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1.03-21 The Haven at North Naples PUDZ Staff Report (PDF) 2.Ordinance - 041123 (PDF) 3. Att B - Letters of Support (PDF) 4. [LINKED] Att C - The Haven at North Naples MPUD CCPC Backup (PDF) 5. Att D - (PL-20220001042) NIM Documents (PDF) 6. Att E -Letters of Objection (PDF) 7. Public Hearing Signs and Affidavit (3-21-2023) (PDF) 8. legal ad - agenda IDs 25274 & 25295 (PDF) Packet Pg. 53 9.B 05/23/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.B Doe ID: 25295 Item Summary: *** This item to be heard no sooner than 10:00 AM. *** This item requires that ex-parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a rezoning Ordinance for The Haven at North Naples MPUD to allow The Carlisle Assisted Living Facility (group care, care units, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and continuing care retirement communities) with a maximum 0.65 Floor Area Ratio and up to 336 multi -family dwelling units, of which 76 will be rent restricted as affordable, on 27.78+/- acres located southwest of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (PUDZ-PL20220001042) (Companion to item 9A) Meeting Date: 05/23/2023 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 04/ 18/2023 5:10 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 04/ 18/2023 5:10 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 04/19/2023 10:37 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 04/19/2023 5:28 PM Growth Management and Community Development Department Diane Lynch Growth Management DepartmentCompleted 04/21/2023 4:50 PM County Attorney's Office Derek D. Perry Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 05/05/2023 4:31 PM Growth Management and Community Development Department James C French Growth Management Completed 05/16/2023 1:21 PM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 05/16/2023 2:14 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 05/16/2023 2:51 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 05/17/2023 1:11 PM County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 05/17/2023 4:40 PM Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 05/23/2023 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 54 9.B.1 CZ; o1[�iCC* r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: APRIL 6, 2023 SUBJECT: THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD, PUDZ-PL20220001042 (Companion to GMPA-PL20220001043) PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owners: SRG CN FL, LLC c/o Harbert Management Corp 200 Crescent Court, Suite 440 Dallas, TX 75201 Applicants/Contract Purchasers: Johnson Development Associates, Inc. 100 Dunbar St. Spartanburg, SC 29306 Charles E. Herring, Todd W. Ward, Whitley S. Ward, John E. Crimmel, Jr., as Attorney -in -Fact for Sharon T. Crimmel, as Trustee of the Sharon T. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, Cynthia Crimmel, as Successor Trustee of the John E. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, and Susan W. Wright, Trustee of the Susan W. Wright Revocable Trust U/A/D May 15, 2019 2171 Forrest Lane Naples, FL 34102 Agent(s): Robert J Mulhere, FAICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Hole Montes, Inc Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34110 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission consider an application to rezone 27.78+ acres from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District with Special Treatment Overlay Zone (ST/W-4) to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) for The Haven at North Naples MPUD with ST/W-4 to allow for the development of 336 multifamily dwelling units in addition to the existing group housing facility, The Carlisle Naples, with a Floor Area Ratio of 0.65. A total of 76 units, or 22.6% of all units, are to be dedicated as affordable units. A Future Land Use Map change is requested in the companion Growth Management Plan Amendment PL20220001043 to amend the FLUM designation of the subject site from Urban Residential subdistrict to Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 1 of 18 21 March 2023 Packet Pg. 55 - UOIIIIad OUIUOZ : 56ZGZ) :podajj:ULjS Zand seldeN 4PoN }e UGABH 041 4Z-Co :jUGWLjoejJV - §� a x ... WY - c fi •'Y �J 4 rY r4'sF 0 J^ Li k - � U tj ,y x a 0 ❑ � m aW p.,. A � i o d 3 G❑ Tannin U rl P[i Ly 1p Q . C 09 a •p � U � �� !v ❑ G7 Wilton DR � m u d � a L L L ❑ ar a Yarherr. L L U ^p .0 L u R d0 I Y a,H• Hd AIil[pond C1R o uut+ 3a•-1 d � aA E N N It CD _ C) CD CD N N C) N J IL v Z 0 l.l.. Q [6 O U J 9.B.1 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The request is for rezoning 27.78+/- acres of property near the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Pulling Road. The property is partially developed with The Carlisle Naples Senior Living Community ("The Carlisle"), which was originally approved as a group care facility conditional use on 17.8 acres zoned Rural Agricultural (A) by Resolution 96-405 (see Attachment B). The proposed rezoning from A to MPUD is proposed to contain The Carlisle Naples group housing facility as it exists, and an addition of 336 dwelling units. Seventy-six of the proposed dwelling units, or 22.6% of the proposed dwelling units, are dedicated as affordable housing. Specifically, 38 units are proposed to be rented to households with income up to and including 100% of the Area Median Income (AMI) and 38 units are to be rented to households with income up to and including 80% of the AMI for Collier County. Details of the affordable housing commitment are provided in Section V of Exhibit F included with the attached Draft Ordinance. The PUD Master Plan (provided on the following page) depicts two tracts: • Tract A, 13.21 acres - occupied by The Carlisle Naples, a 371,133-square foot senior group housing facility with access to Orange Blossom Drive and through Tract B to Airport Pulling Road; • Tract B, 14.57 acres - ten acres of which is undeveloped, and the remainder is currently used for The Carlisle Naples entrance drive, gatehouse, and water management along Airport Pulling Road. On Tract B, The Carlisle Naples entrance drive and gatehouse will remain, and additional off -site parking for The Carlisle is also proposed, plus a multifamily project with 336 dwelling units. Access is limited to the existing entry point along Airport Pulling Road, and an additional right -out only access point, plus an emergency vehicle access to the adjoining property to the south (Bear Creek Apartments) through an existing access easement. Residents of Tract B will not have access to Tract A or Orange Blossom Drive. The only change proposed to Tract A is a restriction that the existing access point along Orange Blossom Drive will be right turn only for existing Carlisle related use only. The Carlisle facility and the residential apartment complex will have separate controlled/gated access points, restricting internal connectivity between the apartments and The Carlisle. To relieve parking demand at The Carlisle, the petitioner requests that additional parking for The Carlisle be allowed as an accessory use on Tract B. The proposed gross density across the entire PUD is 336 units / 27.78 acres = 12.1 dwelling units per gross acre. The net density on Tract B is 336 units / 14.57 acres = 23.06 dwelling units per acre. Maximum building height is proposed to be 40 feet zoned / 45 feet actual for the group care facility and 55 feet, 4 stories zoned / 60 feet actual for the multifamily residential use. Two deviations are requested. Deviation 1 is to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.65 instead of 0.45 for Tract A (The Carlisle). Deviation 2 is to allow an enhanced 10-foot wide Type A buffer instead of the required 15-foot wide Type B buffer along the Tract B northern border. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 3 of 18 March 21, 2023 Packet Pg. 57 - U011118d 6UIUOZ : 56ZGZ) :podajj:1ejS Zand saldeN 4PoN }e UGAeH 041 4Z-£0 :}UGWLj3ejJV � a Z ° i p ❑ W}F a o LL Z ZWWin a O� m wwF a}} 0ErQ5'w/6 0 0. z d Z¢ fJf r l c OLL 4 zw Nz o �g o 0LL wv~ia0 Y�m� Qm ¢� ..a clu�f m yw'R z LL LU 0- LL � _ � mN LLF cZ pW W LiEIY+IK _Jj UO� W!K LUUj F- w LL �- 0 aU >a> a ❑Ow2 W � 2K0 W_❑ F I-o 1LLi ❑ n U MwSa I- X Y$i�� Lou�W Ww w �U 0` C7a © a o�KZZ ❑¢ W (7�d ZmLLIxU� m rj)rr Z� w e ,�ZOQ > mz¢❑ wm0 zo �a �Z¢z �O u���p0 �gjLL a. �LLR � y-,9 ¢ I } m O O W Q I ❑ f V= �' J~ 4 Z~ I L N_ �. d¢ U ❑ g c Y L7 w¢ a cW7❑ F-¢�w c4i mwxax0 �FZ �� dm¢LU`F-u�z :3 a Z p� Zw d'W WOoIL=F 0��0 �c:IW�W�g Vf Z 7c~j �z 0❑o�n p w7criww2 z rn =O dmmgZ_� Co 0o m0r� WO �a0 w�X nOL w 06 w u>Oa 4U¢m ❑ aawa00� �toI}L 00� - W�dLL00� fw UJO p WF-0 OODU O Z❑0=woz Z�F +2 26- 7Zd'UWVJ% O O Om ❑ UU LLZ <F-~99 d �w(J ��� �q �LL m0=pw�� z ¢^U �V wd2 l-� p 4��r❑�a Nc012� ��KU0 iv�Va❑"� ' JH V cW;Kz W-w o0 Q=OZ w w F m Q�� ¢ O VW7 J J Q Q(fj Z a a¢U ❑ r'r^ aa'oFFU c9�F�F0w ❑0i Z Fn �LL--Ww Q w ¢aI� ¢a w z�-uj0W 0 ¢ g0� rUaLW (L(D U Z ZZH Qm� U .. .. C]C77r ?ya0 ��QgrF:4 Om¢ U�Zp W WWrn FF y=S= ¢....mom W7��m�C1 r�FF H 2uw i w�—�~ul fin. K Q ❑0 d U�� ❑HHHrrHHz i�rq� W U ¢ to n Wm�_H wrn mom O F Z[L'a'�y(n fn fqW Ir—LL,QLL K7 � p0 Q ❑Omm-�i❑W - > 0w� � ��O 000¢¢WWa� ¢?Bmu. w ❑ X m¢wD0—z pp� U Uxfq IL FFF gzz(n 02 z2n.m0¢C7 2FF ❑ ®-�f11� �LLFamU3F — W = r > X rl7 A Fm ¢ p.-.W LIJ Q p �ZK Ow_QQ_ zg ICU �cw)z w�W BOLL o ' W O yJ z W (ip y�y =Z .. ±ra! Z a� W J¢a D0� ONO DN<zLLj� Z N a ow a a Y d xs z J F a� rry AIRPORT PULLING ROAD o ,r 0 A od Lu- 1 'w`Wm , 55 �, ` ■■ WZ W c \\ ■ {-� C) i I � y¢ n a- w m I I 40 N K ` Fm2K J I� 4S ® lob ii o w i` CC ❑�Qd o O W W c° ii MG CC {j IfI m 7UZZ n ZW m w ii wo h ra4 j� ❑ a m Q zo a - I Q U Z m O Z ❑ Q i r i i w j U' U¢J N7 UW I ii ao U cd ai I Ll1 ; ¢�m Ipl z��U IN lii za Q �_� °I I m� 0 Cn ZWII! Iw (n Q}} iii oLL I' wIi 3a w - s ZOW �I ONm m I, �O aqN w{II YF m zo I o� mI I LU z 0C � D ¢7 w, III �� °o a'i wW a N w m Ufn Li J Ci I III W. W §:- W 2 I t --- if. _ _--_ -- - -__ _ _ OWO -� W m m Co I��~ w I m J Q W \I W a li W d� w0 m zm Q IU ❑ Y,..Q m ~ c w LU K0 ZILEL { w u, c� w Q z z W u awc ° 7 Z a W LL ¢ z a = W LU _ lu N an d I— awv w W �i 'a LL NILI Wa wM I �O ~ ocwocc �m wa�w0 i ~ cnz w& I 00 0 'n � W Z W W } c �Y z F- R a 1V1iW]G1SBN I z ¢ F- I LL¢ a a a a II All �wzW=rgO�m AON332zoo�z3lsriuvo) cndb JNINOZ -1 w Z - O d jNOI z-u] F ��� I U Z lilt OWW �rcrcd CoQ (Of oddo z O r N PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 4 of 18 9.B.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding the subject site, which is zoned A, Rural Agricultural with an approved group care facility conditional use on 17.8 acres (see Attachment B for conditional use Resolution 96-405). North: Across Orange Blossom Drive is the Collier County Library Headquarters zoned A, Rural Agricultural with conditional use approval (Resolution 03-175). East: Immediately east is the Italian American Club zoned CPUD and approved by Ord. 09- 46, which allows an additional 34,000 square feet of commercial/office use; vacant land zoned A, Rural Agricultural subject to pending GMPA-PL20220003494 and PUDZ- PL20220000533 for Lutgert Medical Center commercial and self -storage facilities; across Airport Pulling Road are the Walden Oaks commercial/office and residential uses of the Lone Oak PUD, the Windward Isle single family subdivision approved as Naples View RPUD, and the Longview Center PUD which currently includes a plant nursery and church, approved by Ordinance No. 19-43 for 15 dwelling units, 73,500 square feet of retail, 70,000 square feet of office, and 58,000 square feet of institutional use. South: Immediately south is Bear Creek Apartments, an affordable multifamily residential development with 120 dwellings (14 units per acre) approved by Ordinance No. 92-20 as the Bear Creek PUD. West: Immediately west of the property are single family lots zoned RSF-1, the Il Regalo single family subdivision approved as The Carlisle Regency RPUD, and a stormwater management lake that is subject to a sunsetted PUD known as Sunshine Village PUD. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 5 of 18 Packet Pg. 59 9.B.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The 27.78+/- acre subject site is Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. Maximum eligible residential density is determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre, except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. The proposed density is 12.1 dwelling units per gross acre, or 23.06 dwelling units per acre on the residential Tract B. Since the petitioner is requesting 336 dwelling units, this PUD Rezoning petition may only be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan if the companion GMP Amendment (PL20220001043) is approved and goes into effect, and the uses and intensities in this PUD align with those in the GMPA. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the petitioner's December 2, 2022, Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then current 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR); the staff also utilized the current 2022 AUIR in this report. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted aspart of the traffic impact statement that addresses theproject's significant impacts on all roadways. " PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 6 of 18 Packet Pg. 60 9.B.1 Staff finding: The staff has evaluated the TIS submitted with the petition and has found that the proposed Haven at North Naples MPUD will add an additional +/- 165 PM peak hour two-way trips on the adjacent roadway network. The proposed development will share the existing access on Airport -Pulling Road with The Carlisle assisted living facility which is included in applicable sections of the TIS analysis. Consistency evaluation for this petition is limited to the additional trips generated by The Haven multifamily development only. The additional trips will impact the following roadway network links: Link # 2.2 Roadway Airport Link Location Orange 2021 AUIR LOS C 2022 AUIR Existing LOS C P.M. Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction 3,000/North 2021 AUIR Remaining Capacity 865 2022 AUIR Remaining Capacity 765 PM Peak Hour Peak Direction Project Volume NB/58 Pulling Blossom Road Drive to Pine Ridge Road 2.1 Airport Orange C D 3,000/North 857 707 NB/23 Pulling Blossom Road Drive to Vanderbilt Beach Road 142.0 Orange Goodlette B B 1,320/West 804 707 WB/2 Blossom Frank Road to Drive Airport Pulling Road 143.0 Orange Airport C C 1,000/West 437 347 WB/3 Blossom Pulling Road Drive to Livingston Road Staff notes that the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed Haven at North Naples MPUD development. Additionally, the project is located within the North West Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) which currently operates with 94.0% of the lane miles meeting the minimum required standards. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan within the 5-year planning period, and the Transportation Planning staff recommends approval of the request. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 1.55 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.39 acres (25%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. The petitioner is seeking to satisfy the native vegetation preservation requirement through off -site preservation of a 1.56+/- acre off -site mitigation parcel. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 7 of 18 March 21, 2023 Packet Pg. 61 9.B.1 consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition cannot be approved until the companion GMPA is adopted and goes into effect. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." Drainage: Stormwater Management Section staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The required preserve is 0.39 acres (25% of 1.55 acres of native vegetation); the Master Plan illustrates the minimum PUD preserve requirement will be addressed offsite in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07.11.11. No listed animal or plant species were observed on the property; however, the property has the potential to contain habitat for several listed species, including the Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) and Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia). An updated listed species survey and management plan will have to be included at time of site development plan (SDP) and/or plat (PPL) to address how listed species will be protected on -site. The property is in Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones (ST/W-4) and must address ground water protection in accordance with LDC Section 3.06.12. Due to the proximity of this property to drinking water wells, Pollution Prevention Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be provided at time of PPL or SDP review for those land uses which have the potential to cause impacts to drinking water. Environmental Services staff recommend approval of the proposed petition. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Landscape Review: The petitioner is seeking a deviation from the required 15-foot wide Type B landscape buffer where the entry drive within Tract B is adjacent to vacant land zoned A, Rural Agricultural subject to pending GMPA-PL20220003494 and PUDZ-PL20220000533 for the proposed Lutgert Medical Center commercial and self -storage facilities to instead allow for an enhanced 10-foot wide Type A perimeter landscape buffer. See Deviation Discussion below. Zoning Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses relative to intensity and compatibility. The proposed multifamily residential use is generally consistent with the PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 8 of 18 March 21, 2023 Packet Pg. 62 9.B.1 surrounding context, which is characterized by a mix of activities and approved uses that are institutional, commercial, and residential in nature. Per the Development Standards Table in Exhibit B included in the Draft Ordinance, maximum zoned building height for the multifamily project is 55 feet (not to exceed 4 stories) and maximum actual height is 60 feet. Minimum setbacks are proposed to be 30 feet along Airport Pulling Road and 50 feet from single family properties to the rear. The petitioner submitted two letters of support from property owners to the rear of the project site dated October 28, 2022. These letters recognize the project will include five story buildings and much greater setbacks (see Attachment B): • Orsie Anthony's letter of support recognizes the project will include a five story building that is 130 feet from Mr. Anthony's property line. • Sylvester Cotton's letter of support recognizes the project will include a five story building that is 130 feet from Mr. Cotton's property line. Staff supports that the petitioner has since reduced the maximum building height to four stories as indicated in the Development Standards Table in Exhibit B included in the Draft Ordinance. Sta recommends a condition of approval to update the Development Standards Table in Exhibit B to reflect the greater rear setback of 130 feet. The proposed density of 12.1 units per gross acre is in keeping with development densities in the project vicinity, however the "net" density calculated on the Multifamily Tract only of 23.06 dwelling units per net acre is higher than the densities approved in the vicinity, as displayed below. Maximum Total Density Building Max. Building Name (PUD) Total Acres Dwellings (DU/AC) Height (Zoned) Height (Actual) The Haven (proposed) 13.21 ac (A) Tract A+B = 12.1 Tract A: 40 ft. Tract A: 45 ft. Tract A Group housing 14.57 ac (B) 336 units Tract B = 23.06 Tract B: 55 ft. / Tract B: 60 ft. Tract B Multifamily 4 stories Bear Creek 8.57 ac 120 units 14.00 38 ft n/a ORD. 92-20 Keystone Place (The Oasis Apartments) 34.00 ac 406 units 11.94 3 stories n/a ORD. 87-72 Longview Center ORD. 19-43 North+South = North: 55 ft. / approved for 15 dwelling 9.68 ac (N) 0.75 3 stories North: 62 ft. units, 73,500 square feet of 9.04 ac (S) 15 units South = 1.65 South: 40 ft. / retail, 70,000 square feet of 3 floors including South: n/a office, and 58,000 square 1" floor parking feet of institutional use Naples View (Windward Isle) 11.32 ac 33 units 2.90 35 ft. 40 ft. ORD. 12-22 & HEX 14-15 Lone Oak 2.0 ac Comm.+ Res. _ ORD. 87-76 & (commercial) 604 units 6.32 30 ft. / 3 stories n/a ORD. 89-30 93.5 ac (res.) Res. = 6.46 PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 9 of 18 March 21, 2023 Packet Pg. 63 9.B.1 A commitment to affordable housing has been made in Section V of Exhibit F included with the attached Draft Ordinance. Of the 336 proposed dwelling units, a total of 76 units, or 22.6% of all units, are committed to be affordable for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. 38 units are to be rented to households with income up to and including 100% of the Area Median Income (AMI), and 38 units are to be rented to households with income up to and including 80% of the AMI for Collier County. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08." (Zoning Division staff responses in non -bold). 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Zoning Division staff has reviewed the request and finds that the 27.78+ acre project, which proposes 336 dwelling units of which 76 are committed to be affordable housing units, together with the existing ALF facility, is compatible with the existing and approved commercial, institutional and multifamily uses in the area. The staff analysis section of this staff report summarizes the findings of suitability relative to the land, traffic, and infrastructure. The location is in an urbanized area, and the intersection of Airport Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive is characterized by a mix of activities that are institutional, commercial, and residential in nature, making it suitable for the addition of more housing options, including some that are affordable. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the [GMPJ. Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. Staff finds that the proposed amendment will be consistent with the GMP upon adoption of the companion GMP Amendment (GMPA- PL20220001043) to designate the site within the Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 10 of 18 Packet Pg. 64 9.B.1 Staff finds that the proposed project will be compatible with the mix of commercial, institutional, and residential development that is existing and approved within the surrounding area. The Carlisle Naples facility is proposed to remain as it is currently developed. The maximum building height for the proposed multi -family project is four stories as indicated in the Development Standards Table in Exhibit B included in the Draft Ordinance, and letters of support submitted by the petitioner describe the proposed buildings as 130 feet from the property line of single family homes to the rear. Staff recommends a condition of approval to update the Development Standards Table in Exhibit B to reflect the treater rear setback of 130 feet. This greater rear setback provides for appropriate separation to protect adjoining single family parcels. A commitment is made in Section VI of Exhibit F included with the attached Draft Ordinance to provide an enhanced western Tract B perimeter buffer, including a concrete block and stucco wall eight feet in height with plantings on the western portion of the wall. The petitioner seeks a deviation from the northern perimeter buffer within Tract B abutting future commercial uses to allow a 10-foot wide Type A buffer rather than a 15-foot Type B, while proposing will include enhanced landscaping consisting of shrubs. Relative to internal and external compatibility, the two tracts will not have internal buffering and they will not connect, except for off -site parking for The Carlisle proposed on Tract B. A commitment is in Section II of Exhibit F included with the attached Draft Ordinance that the multi- family project in Tract B shall not have access to Orange Blossom Drive through Tract A. An "Emergency Vehicles Only" interconnection is provided at the south property line of Tract B where there is a recorded 24-foot wide ingress/egress easement. Buffering to the south along the Bear Creek Apartments will be a 10-foot wide Type A buffer. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The Master Plan indicates that open space will be 30% of the total site area, or 8.33 acres. Proposed permitted accessory uses on Tract B may include recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents of Tract B, or customary accessory uses and structures to multi -family which may include passive open space uses and structures such as gazebos, fountains, trellises, and similar structures. Outdoor accessory uses for Tract A include open space uses and structures such as swimming pools and deck, walking trails, hardscape, seating, trellis and desks, lawn games, putting greens, courtyards, garden and landscaping. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The development must comply with all applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 11 of 18 Packet Pg. 65 9.B.1 The property is proposed to accommodate 336 dwelling units and an existing 371,000+/- square foot existing ALF use. The PUD boundary will likely not be further expanded due to existing development to the west and south and existing public roadway to the east and north. The property to the north of Tract B is currently used for overflow parking, and is subject to pending GMPA- PL20220003494 and PUDZ-PL20220000533 for the proposed Lutgert Medical Center commercial and self -storage facilities. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Two deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC) are requested in connection with this rezone petition. See page 16 of this staff report for discussion of the deviations. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the (FLUM) and other elements of the GMP. They have found the proposed The Haven at North Naples MPUD to be consistent with the GMP, subject to adoption of the companion GMP Amendment (GMPA-PL20220001043). 2. The existing land use pattern. The proposed Haven at North Naples MPUD is located in an urbanized portion of the County adjacent to Airport Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive. The property is also proximate to existing and approved urban levels of development, and major destinations including regional shopping along Naples Boulevard and schools and the library are also in the general vicinity. The property is south of a designated Mixed -Use Activity Center, Activity Center #11, located at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport Pulling Road and is specifically intended for concentrated commercial and mixed -use development due to access to the arterial roadway network and available public services. Abutting the subject site to the east, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Pulling Road, the Italian American Club has a Future Land Use Designation of Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict. This subdistrict allows for existing institutional uses, future institutional uses, medical and general office, adult and child day care, personal and business services, and similar uses. Also, the Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict located to the east across Airport Pulling Road and corresponding Longview Center PUD is approved by Ordinance No. 19-43 for 15 dwelling units, 73,500 square feet of retail, 70,000 square feet of office, and 58,000 square feet of institutional use. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 12 of 18 Packet Pg. 66 9.B.1 The proposed addition of residential uses on property adjacent to the existing Carlisle Naples will be compatible with the surrounding land use pattern; however, the proposed density is not supported by the Growth Management Plan. As such, this PUD petition may only be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan if the companion GMPA (PL20220001043) is approved and goes into effect and the uses and intensities in this PUD align with those in the GMPA. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The properties to the west, south, and east of the subject property are zoned PUD and allow for residential, commercial, and institutional uses. The proposed location for the MPUD will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The MPUD boundary follows the existing boundary of the parcels. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not specifically necessary but is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. The petitioner believes the rezoning is necessary to accommodate the construction of a facility that will meet a market need of the surrounding community and provide multi -family residential market rate and affordable housing units. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change is not likely to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed buffers and development standards are established with consideration of compatibility with neighboring properties. Staff recommends a condition of approval to update the Development Standards Table in Exhibit B to reflect the greater rear setback of 130 feet. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project. The development must comply with all applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The PUDZ request is not anticipated to create a stormwater management problem in the area; PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 13 of 18 March 21, 2023 Packet Pg. 67 9.B.1 provided an environmental resource permit that adequately addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, on -site stormwater treatment, attenuation storage, flood plain compensation and maintenance is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated that this MPUD will reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed rezoning from A to MPUD to allow 336 residential units along with the existing ALF facility is not likely to deter development activity or improvement of surrounding properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed GMP Amendment (PL20220001043) is approved, that will constitute a public policy statement supporting that the development parameters are found to be appropriate, and the zoning action would subsequently be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as amended. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed density cannot be achieved without amending the Growth Management Plan and rezoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. Per the definition of density in the Density Rating System of the FLUE and in LDC Section 4.07.02.D.I., residential densities permittable in PUDs are calculated on acreage that excludes areas designated for commercial, industrial, or other land use having an established equivalent residential density in the LDC. For the subject project, this calculation yields a density based on PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 14 of 18 March 21, 2023 Packet Pg. 68 9.B.1 the Tract B area of 23.06 units per acre. Through the companion GMPA request, the petitioner proposes the calculation of density for this project to be based on the combined area of The Carlisle (Tract A) and the residential area (Tract B). As proposed, the project density based on the entire PUD area (Tract A + Tract B) equates to 12.1 units per acre. It is staff s opinion that the density of Tract B (23.06 units per acre) may be out of scale with the current needs of the neighborhood. Surrounding properties have been approved at lower densities. For instance, Bear Creek PUD to the south was approved in 1992 for a maximum of 120 dwelling units, or 14 units per acre. Carlisle Regency RPUD to the west was approved for a maximum of 35 units, or 2.99 units per acre. The County does have a need for housing that is affordable. The proposed rezoning would yield 76 units affordable to households with incomes at the 80% and 100% AMI levels, plus 260 market rate units. The density of 23.06 units per acre on Tract B significantly exceeds the scale of densities in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed density reaches levels of density that could be found within Activity Centers. The Orange Blossom Drive/Airport Pulling Road intersection is not a designated Activity Center, however it has very similar characteristics to other Activity Centers in the county considering the mix of development types and access to major transportation corridors. Additionally, the Airport Road corridor is served by Collier Area Transit Route 12 which connects to points as far south as the Government Complex and points as far north as Creekside which offers a Lee -Collier transit system link. Major destinations including regional shopping along Naples Boulevard and schools and the library are also in the general vicinity. Given these factors, higher density and intensity development may be justified at this node/intersection if the companion GMP Amendment is approved. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP, subject to adoption of the companion GMP Amendment (PL20220001043). Staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the MPUD would require considerable site alteration. This project will undergo evaluation relative to all applicable federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and subsequently as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 15 of 18 March 21, 2023 Packet Pg. 69 9.B.1 Public facility capacities have been reviewed as part of this application process. The development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION The petitioner is seeking two deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are restated below, directly from PUD Exhibit E included with the attached Draft Ordinance. The petitioner's rationale is restated, along with the staff recommendation below. Proposed Deviation # 1: (Group Housing - FAR) Seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1, Group Housing, which states the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for ALF/Group Housing shall not exceed 0.45, to instead allow for a maximum FAR of 0.65. Petitioner's Justification: "The LDC Limits the FAR for ALFs to 0.45; however, on numerous occasions, through the PUD process, a deviation has been granted to allow higher ALF typically of 0.60, but on occasion higher than that. The Carlisle was approved through a Conditional Use (CU-96-405). At that time the Zoning Ordnance did not include an FAR for ALFs as the means of regulating intensity for ALFs, and none was applied to the Carlisle. As part of our submittal, we are adding +/- 10 acres of additional land to the 17.78-acre existing Carlisle site, and then establishing two development tracts. Tract A (13.21 acres) contains the existing Carlisle facilities and Tract B (14.57 Acres) will be the location of the multi -family apartments, as well as a shared entry (from Airport) and additional parking to support the Carlisle (as they are currently leasing apportion of the Italian American Club for employee parking). The Carlisle is 3 71,13 3 s.f. in total building area. The current parcel (17.78 acres) is 774,496.80 total square feet in size (17.78 x 43,560). Applying the LDC maximum 0.45 FAR for an ALF yields a maximum square footage allowed of 348,523.56 square feet. The Carlisle, at 371,133 gross s.f., exceeds the maximum LDC allowable FAR of 0.45 (348,523.56 square feet) by 22,609.44 s.f. The Carlisle is deemed to be legal nonconforming in this respect. Using the proposed 13.21-acre size for the Carlisle (Tract A) yields a total square footage of 575,427.60 s.f. Applying the requested 0.65 FAR yields a maximum gross building area of 374,027.94. The gross floor area of the Carlisle is 371,133 s.f., which is a FAR of 0.645. If approved, the requested rezoning will rescind the approved Conditional Use permitting the Carlisle Naples, the existing ALF on Tract A. A maximum FAR of 0.65 will allow for the existing Carlisle Naples to continue operations. The FAR use will be limited to Tract A. The MPUD limits Tract B to multi -family residential." PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 16 of 18 Packet Pg. 70 9.B.1 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL, finding that this request to increase the maximum floor area ratio on Tract A for the existing ALF is in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3. The petitioner's justification clarifies that no additional intensification will occur, the adjustment to the ratio is based on the adjusted land area used for the calculation. Therefore, "the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Proposed Deviation # 2: (Buffer Requirements) Seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, Table 2.4, which requires a 15' wide, Type B perimeter buffer where the proposed multi -family development is adjacent to commercial uses to instead allow for an enhanced 10' wide Type A perimeter landscape buffer. Petitioner's Justification: "This deviation applies to the northern portion of Tract B. The parcel to the north of Tract B is vacant and zoned Agricultural; however, the property is used by the adjacent Italian American Club for overflow parking. The overflow parking is considered a commercial use, necessitating the Type B landscape buffer requirement when typically, a Type A perimeter buffer would be required (multifamily residential is adjacent to a vacant, agriculturally zoned property). Moreover, this parcel will most likely be used for commercial purposes in the future. The portion of Tract B adjacent to the AG parcel will be developed with an access road, parking, and entrance features (such a fountains, a gatehouse, landscaping, etc.). The proposed Type A buffer will be enhanced with shrubs a minimum of ten gallons in size, four feet in height, spaced a maximum of four feet on center at the time of planting. The enhanced buffer will provide attractive, appropriate landscaping and will not result in a negative impact to the surrounding area." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL, finding that this request to reduce the landscape buffer is appropriate in the context of the limited proposed site features in the vicinity of this property line. The adjacent parcel is vacant land zoned A, Rural Agricultural, subject to pending GMPA-PL20220003494 and PUDZ-PL20220000533 for the proposed Lutgert Medical Center commercial and self -storage facilities. Because the petitioner proposes to enhance the buffer with shrubs, it can be found that "the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" per LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., and that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations" per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The petitioner conducted a NIM on Monday, September 26, 2002 at Collier County Public Library, 2385 Orange Blossom Drive. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at 7:20 p.m. Approximately 153 members of the public attended. Extensive questions were asked and concerns were raised regarding traffic, access, design, and affordable housing units. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment D. PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 17 of 18 Packet Pg. 71 9.B.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's office on March 14, 2023. RECOMMENDATION: There is a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) petition, PL20220001043. The MPUD may only be found consistent with the GMP if the GMPA is approved and becomes effective. Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition PUDZ- PL20220001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to revision to the Development Standards Table in Exhibit B to reflect the rear setback of 130 feet, and with an effective date linked to the effective date of the companion GMP Amendment petition. Attachments: A) Draft Ordinance B) Letters of Support C) Application/Backup Materials D) NIM Documentation PUDZ-PL2022001042 The Haven at North Naples MPUD March 21, 2023 Page 18 of 18 Packet Pg. 72 9.B.2 ORDINANCE NO.2023- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REZONING THE CARLISLE NAPLES AND THE SOUTHERLY ADJACENT PARCEL TO ALLOW GROUP CARE, CARE UNITS, NURSING HOMES, ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES, AND CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES USES WITH A MAXIMUM 0.65 FLOOR AREA RATIO AND UP TO 336 MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO A MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO BE KNOWN AS THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD ON 27.78t ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE AND AIRPORT ROAD IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION 96-405, A CONDITIONAL USE ESTABLISHING THE GROUP CARE FACILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PL20220001042) WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing SRG CN FL, LLC, a E Delaware limited liability company, Johnson Development Associates, Inc., a South Carolina r corporation, Charles E. Herring, Todd W. Ward, Whitley S. Ward, John E. Crimmel, Jr., as Q Attorney -in -Fact for Sharon T. Crimmel, as Trustee of the Sharon T. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, Cynthia Crimmel, as Successor Trustee of the John E. Crimmel [22-CPS-02259/1784092/1] 176 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 1 of 3 PL20220001042 g 4/ 11 /23 Packet Pg. 73 9.B.2 Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, and Susan W. Wright, Trustee of the Susan W. Wright Revocable Trust U/A/D May 15, 2019, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) for a 27.78± acre parcel to be known as The Haven at North Naples MPUD in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Repeal of Conditional Use Resolution. Resolution No. 96-405, a conditional use for a group care facility is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2023- becomes effective. [22-CPS-02259/1784092/1] 176 The Haven at North Naples MPUD PL20220001042 Page 2 of 3 4/11/23 Packet Pg. 74 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2023. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: ,_A\ '� Derek D. Perry 'A� 0 Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit D — Legal Description Exhibit E — Deviations Exhibit F — Developer Commitments [22-CPS-02259/1784092/1]176 The Haven at North Naples MPUD PL20220001042 4/11/23 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA M. Page 3 of 3 Rick LoCastro, Chairman M N O d V C C L 0 C d E t U fC r Q Packet Pg. 75 9.B.2 EXHIBIT A THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES Regulations for development of the MPUD shall be in accordance with the content of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the MPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. I. Tract A Permitted Uses A. Principal Permitted Uses. 1. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to § 429.02 F.S. and Ch. 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to Ch. 651 F.S. and Ch. 690-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC Section 5.05.04 at a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.65 for Principal/Accessory Buildings. 2. Any other commercial or professional use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or HEX, pursuant to the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, subject to I.A.1. above, including, but not limited to: 1. Indoor Accessory Uses including the following: Administrative Offices; Housekeeping; Public Restrooms; Coat Room; Main Dining Room; Private dining; Central Kitchen; Library; Game/Card Rooms; Business Center; Billiards Room; Arts Studio; Beauty/Barber Shop; Resident Social Director's Office; Receiving Room; Nurse Practitioner's Office; Auditorium; Exercise Studio; Physical Therapy; Physician Office; Locker Room and Showers; Massage/Spa Therapy; Beauty Salon (AL & SNF); Exercise Physiologist Office; Resident Services Director's Office; Resident Services Staff s Office; Sales and Marketing. The aforementioned uses are only available to residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor Accessory Uses including the following: Parking facilities; covered loading dock; guard house; outdoor recreational facilities such as swimming pool and deck and similar facility; walking trails; signs and water management facilities; hardscape, Page 1 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 76 9.B.2 seating, trellis and decks; lawn games — croquet, badminton and lawn bowling; deck and trellis; putting greens; courtyard, garden and landscaping; maintenance building. II. Tract B Permitted Uses A. Principal Permitted Uses 1. Multi -family dwelling units, not to exceed 336 total dwelling units (12.10 dwelling units per gross acre). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, including, but not limited to: 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents (and their guests) of Tract B, such as swimming pools, fitness centers, dining facilities, sports courts, and clubhouse/recreation buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to multi -family units, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, signage, entry gates and gatehouse, administrative offices, and similar structures. 3. Additional and/or offsite parking for Tract A. 4. Temporary sales facilities may be permitted. Page 2 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 77 9.B.2 EXHIBIT B HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for the uses within Haven at North Naples MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TRACT B TRACT B CLUBHOUSE/ TRACT A MULTI -FAMILY RECREATION GROUP CARE, ETC. BUILDINGS' PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MIN. LOT AREA 10 Ac. N/A 10 Ac. MIN. LOT WIDTH 150' N/A 150' MIN. FLOOR AREA 700 S.F./DU N/A N/A MINIMUM YARDS MEASURED FROM THE PUD BOUNDARY NORTH, ADJ TO ORANGE N/A N/A 30' BLOSSOM DR. FRONT YARD NORTH, ADJ TO AG ZONED 20' 20' N/A PARCEL SIDE YARD SOUTH SIDE YARD 30' 30' N/A EAST FRONT YARD 30' 30' 30' WEST REAR YARD 13014 130' 30' MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK' 25' 25' 25' MIN. LAKE SETBACK' 0' 0' 0' /z OF THE ZONED '/z OF THE ZONED '/z OF THE ZONED MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDING HEIGHT BUILDING HEIGHT BUILDING HEIGHT OR STRUCTURES OR AS REQ. BY FIRE OR AS REQ. BY FIRE AS REQ. BY FIRE CODE, WHICHEVER CODE, WHICHEVER CODE, WHICHEVER IS IS GREATER IS GREATER GREATER MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 55' NTE 4 STORIES 35' NTE 2 STORIES 40' ZONED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 60' 42' 45' ACTUAL MAX. FAR GROUP HOUSING N/A N/A 0.65 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (MEASURED FROM THE PUD BOUNDARY) NORTH, ADJ TO ORANGE N/A N/A SPS BLOSSOM DR.(FRONT YARD NORTH, ADJ TO AG ZONED SPS SPS N/A PARCEL SIDE YARD SOUTH SIDE YARD SPS SPS N/A EAST (FRONT YARD) SPS SPS SPS WEST REAR YARD SPS4 SPS SPS MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK' 10' 10, 10, MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN SPS SPS SPS STRUCTURES MAX. HEIGHT ZONED 20' 20' 20' MAX. HEIGHT ACTUAL 25' 25' 25' SPS = Same as Principal Structures; NTE = not to exceed; S.F. = square feet; BH = building height. Footnotes: 1. If clubhouse/recreation buildings are located within a multi -family building, the required setbacks shall be the same as multi -family. 2. These setbacks shall be applicable if the preserve is located on -site. 3. Measured to the lake maintenance easement. 4. Single -story garages (NTE 20' in height) and trash enclosures shall be setback no less than 30'. Page 3 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 78 9.B.2 TABLE II: PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS Direction Buffer Type North, adjacent to Orange Blossom Dr. 20' Type D North, adjacent to A zoned property 10' Enhanced Type A South 10' Type A East, adjacent to Airport Pulling Road 20' Type D East, adjacent to CPUD and A zoned parcels 10' Type A West, within Tract A I 10' Type A West, within Tract B 1 15' Enhanced T e B c 0 a� a a� c r- 0 N LO 0 N �fJ N M N O t� C C L 0 c Cd G i V y.i Q Page 4 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 79 N m jldUN 4V0N III? uaneH 841 ZVOWOOZZOZld - u011148d 6u1uoZ : 56ZGZ) £Z66ti0 - a0ueu1p,110 :}uGm40e;jd d Q ON�"� a Wco Qo b o tNzLm O C�YiLC- ❑ 0< w wF O �z a IL wX w�: Q WV W ZK� Z C¢ 2 C07 WQ 0 aOZ w J W Q �W UO daW LmLQU n Q� .U a=OW,1 W,a w YWm�ZIra� O W FZa�WA4 �w ❑a 00 Od o O ¢ ❑Q w JQ w Q❑ LLi U�m d 2 z0 W m °�Qz ogom 7O �O❑ o U��F-- w�gw 2L �U ud d L7a 2' } m0 SOW ¢ II W dNw2 o ❑ N xF Jf- w `~r•a¢d' J LL Q zOILm LL Z. ¢ pr W tJJOm 'z g C9 Z mQ QI� �' C5" F¢�z o z� cC�ts w M � ❑0=20 W❑ow0> C7 F- Jz U1x<Z ❑mQIL W Z 1 m1LZ,n ¢ J a y ❑' Ow<O ww Z �I dZ Dpoin O m— ln�f- mSr =2 F CLN W Sw En SU 2, Wp ILSr7 Lu LL'- wwz 'Z p0 �LL`m �Zar ON m ❑ LL2' ❑F- Tn W' ON CCd000 ❑_ 00< QUFF ] Q-' �Ua'aO} daWWOOU R w[QLxLI Z '��v OV oS wo❑a a w LL4LU< W ¢ 0) cwoo 7 ULi w~� OODU O LLZF--�� 3 �'OmxW�W � X7 06 L7❑w W nzwuwm2 mOx❑ ��� _U ❑ ''Z O a Om a2 ❑� z' ddCj LuF OwwdZZ�� '❑ 1= Ww'�~wwC7 ¢-JW0J< myz LL �aXUO NVUzp❑WW no a CCJ F a¢U -i N ul`'7 : m QU Y ww Z Z w,W dQpo W Q O Q w O Z UaF FUW W Z ❑0Z Z Z,6 Q w m Q100FLQL Zw x a} J Om m 4ww Z Q Z ZZF l ❑ 0 r M1 U7 QdFFON FFU U Q Q ❑❑ w0 W W Q H O Z �� W j m¢ O Q C j 0 Q� J N W W} j U J W 2 W W 7 CCp❑ UU Q ¢ Q Ud'1 OHHH �� Zw` F ? 7=Jm�w m J �~ ~ O U¢ ~ Q Ij wLL J� ❑ m J-�( ~/ wg-�Fw W J- J w m F- a ❑ CC m m 2W❑ O F CC D 2 2~ m m w. zOOOQQ Ww LLZ �ZZmWWO� x dz .,:L, ?� Q�[[ W p :N QJ�m� 13� 2 p�QW 20�2 — 00 cl' O ULL'm LL. FFF Z�avYOQC7 `OFF ❑ �LLFa 2U�F _ W J Qzly ❑WQF Z� dQU a_LL — mUz �%'wzLLJw OOLL G7mJw �(w WO zw¢ zJZO 19 m 2z6i N(D OZW� w� 00? W c� a /co o -cod w0 ❑d a W m amLL' J 3 OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD nb � 0 ❑ z � a1� CFO `nw GO OO ' III m w }�dy ❑�C� 0 w ®w raO; iu~7i IIllIIIIi i 7 :Lc 7u7 mm Z WZ r0. I I n Q a I W2WW 0 o4 CC > --m g J Z)Qa W]w N \\ ` 1 [C 1 1 p�U ❑ dDQZ `v Zp m a ii ap m III M� j w 0 L I r}Z UZ_m � Z ❑- 1 N II EL rr, FIn ZUFU Im LL O= UW ili a� Q Qa olll W C77m IU) Zww Iw co Q III o� zo Ld SQ ZOw W Day Z) zo t Po �� LU YF QKF O ¢p o wr �J III oD �I ` W w NW¢ m u�ll a'U -� = o Ij m l l i 0_ W J 00 LlJ i O Q I - w w--_---�_ Ji W} LLI = Q - `- Ir. -=--r.=.=_J t- -. m II�'I ,II m m m j ry� li II NN ❑Q V cm �� ¢ m w W� LL III I,w�\ w W rL I YJ wa UJ m 1 Q a a Z Z w m Z 7 ..-_ j W m w ❑ o 11 w 0 w� ZO O I W m U ❑ LU �w i� N Ir W o LLI a w W 2 (L a we Z w i a cL N m N O CY F LL W N w 4i }II`�I1 LY ual w �C7 I o c w0 bd 0 n� w l Q� w } o ca t- Y I J z / R'D IVI1N3aISMJ I z a I LL¢ a W � = !U . llI V=1 ]-19NIS =3sn I cn � � z cc LU °a a s I O m lAON3O32� ❑ 2 U o w Q o zD '� msll�f3) and-6 ONINOZ I a j CLLf Z z y �nw� U C7 Q O�W z LuZ Nwfy 0000 Z 2 2 71 O r N s � G 2 Cf C Z W in Z a. 0- Q z 2 W 2 F- 0 00 6 a L) m a Page 5 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) 9.B.2 EXHIBIT D THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PARCEL NO. 00238040007) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 2°14'00" WEST 1049.41', THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, SOUTH 89°51'42" WEST 100.07' TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 31 AND THE PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, SOUTH 89°51'42" WEST 1250.68' TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 1°57'50" WEST 347.75'; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 89-51,42" EAST 1249.04' TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROUTE 31; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 2° 14'00" EAST 347.75' TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; BEING A PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1.4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PARCEL NO.00238240001) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 02 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 1397.16 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 100.02 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD (C.R. 31) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 602.51 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 646.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 972.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 584.37 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, 660.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 660.26 FEET TO THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, 311.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 6 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 81 9.B.2 EXHIBIT E HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation 1 (Group Housing) seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1, Group Housing, which states the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for ALF/Group Housing shall not exceed 0.45, to instead allow for a maximum FAR of 0.65. Deviation 2 (Buffer Requirements) seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 — Buffer Requirements, Table 2.4, which requires a 15' wide, Type B perimeter landscape buffer where the proposed multi- family development is adjacent to commercial uses to instead allow for an enhanced, 10' foot wide Type A perimeter landscape buffer. Page 7 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 82 9.B.2 EXHIBIT F HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The purpose of this section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. I. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for MPUD monitoring until close-out of the MPUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all MPUD commitments until close-out of the MPUD. At the time of this MPUD approval, the Managing Entity is Johnson Development Associates, Inc. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the MPUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of MPUD commitments. B. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. Development of the subject property shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections and parts of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan (SDP), excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. D. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Page 8 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 83 9.B.2 IL TRANSPORTATION: A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the MPUD shall not exceed 343 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. The multi -family project in Tract B shall not have access to Orange Blossom Drive through Tract A. C. At time of SDP, an access connection shall be provided by owner to Bear Creek Drive, limited to emergency vehicles only, at the location depicted on the PUD Master Plan utilizing the 24' wide ingress/egress easement (OR BK 1891, PG 1565). III. PLANNING: A. The developer of any group housing, including a retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to compliance with LDC Section 5.05.04 (with the exception of the deviation granted from LDC Section 5.05.04.D. I to allow a maximum FAR of 0.65), and subject to the following operational standards for the units in the group housing, including, but not limited to, independent living units, assisted living units, or skilled nursing units: Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: i. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; ii. There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; iii. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents' needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; iv. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; v. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; vi. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; vii. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. Page 9 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 84 9.B.2 viii. Group housing for seniors shall be constructed to have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site in the event of a hurricane. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that are required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities ("State Requirements for Educational Facilities, 2014") and shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up generator for a period of no less than 96 hours. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. The minimum required native preservation is f0.39 Ac. (25% of 1.55 Ac.). Pursuant to LDC Sec. 3.05.07.H.1.f., the developer will mitigate the preservation requirement off -site or via payment -in -lieu. If mitigated off -site, the developer shall donate ±1.56 Ac. (±0.39 Ac x 4) to Collier County or to another government agency. B. A listed species management plan will be provided for Eastern Indigo Snake and Big Cypress Fox Squirrel, as well as any other listed species found on -site at the time of development approval. The management plan will address how listed species will be protected, including the listed plant species observed within the development footprint. V. AFFORDABLE HOUSING A. To achieve the 336 dwelling units, the MPUD shall commit to the following: 38 units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and an additional 38 units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the AMI for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. B. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units, including rent data for rented units, in a format approved by Collier County Community and Human Services Division. Developer agrees to annual on -site monitoring by the County. C. The County at any time may inspect the business records of the owner and/or managing entity relating to affordable housing monitoring and compliance, by providing a minimum of 7 calendar days advance notice. VI. OTHER A. Enhancements to the northern perimeter buffer within Tract B shall consist of shrubs a minimum of ten gallons in size, four feet in height, spaced a maximum of four feet on center at the time of planting. Page 10 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 85 9.B.2 B. Enhancements to the western perimeter buffer within Tract B shall consist of a concrete block and stucco wall eight feet in height. The required landscape buffer plantings will be located on the western portion of the wall. C. With respect to the perimeter landscape buffer along the south property line, where said buffer incudes a portion the Collier County Drainage Easement (OR 2870 PG 11): i. No required landscape buffer plantings shall be located within the portion of the buffer that is encumbered by the County's Drainage Easement; and ii. Prior to Site Development Plan (SDP) submittal, the developer shall coordinate with the Collier County Landscape Architect to identify the types of plantings that will meet the LDC requirements for this buffer, while reducing root impacts and/or excessive growth of such plantings on the infrastructure (pipe(s)) located in said Drainage Easement. Page 11 of 11 The Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) v3 (4-14-2023) Packet Pg. 86 9.B.3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 03F7BA30-BC1B-428F-8340-50A9DE430262 JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. Parr of ThelohnsonGrouh October 28, 2022 Mr. Sylvester Cotton 2337 Anthony Court Naples, Florida 34109 RE: Proposed Haven of North Naples Development Multifamily Residential Apartment Project Dear Mr. Cotton, As you know, we are in the process of applying for approvals for the development of a new multifamily project immediately east of your home on Anthony Court. The project is planned to have up to 336 residential units in buildings that are in close proximity to your personal residence. The building closest to your home will be a five -story building and is approximately 440' from your home and about 130' from the property line. Most of the buildings in the planned development will be five -story buildings. We will be providing a new fence with landscaping as a buffer between the new development and your home as required by Collier County. Please sign IAow if you support of our proposed development. r Cotton Thank you, Kerryann Wilson Regional Director of Florida, Multifamily Division Attachments: preliminary site plan, aerial photo 1130 OuNBAR STREET, Su1TE 400 Pp 90x 3524 664.585.2000 864.594.59913 SPARTANRURO. SO 293O6 SPARTA"uRC.. SC 29302 WWW.JOHNSONDEVELOPMENT.NET Packet Pg. 87 4:PoN W uaneH a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - u011148d 6UIUOZ : 56NZ) :poddng jo sja;18-1 - 8 jjV :;uauiyoe;ley co co 6 a w �a a 9.B.3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 61789DF3-3BC7-4AAO-ADCI-FEA22EEA29B5 JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. Part ofThejohnsonC rouup October 28, 2022 Mr. Orsie Anthony 2373 Anthony Court Naples, Florida 34109 RE: Proposed Haven of North Naples Development Multifamily Residential Apartment Project Dear Mr. Anthony, As you know, we are in the process of applying for approvals for the development of a new multifamily project immediately east of your home on Anthony Court. The project is planned to have up to 336 residential units in buildings that are in close proximity to your personal residence. The building closest to your home will be a five -story building and is approximately 280' from your home and about 130' from the property line. Most of the buildings in the planned development will be five -story buildings. We will be providing a new fence with landscaping as a buffer between the new development and your home as required by Collier County. Please sign below if you support of our proposed development. Mr. Orsie Anthony Thank you, C......... iiu,"', ,ry I t VYi?r�U In (Plkhla. Kerryann Wilson Regional Director of Florida, Multifamily Division Attachments: preliminary site plan, aerial photo 100 DUNBAR STREET. 6UITE 400 PO OUX 3524 S64.Sa S.2000 E64.594.5999 SPARTANBURG. SO 29306 SPARTANBURU. SO 29302 WWW. JOHN SONOEVELDPMENT. NET Packet Pg. 89 IA IV to go 9.B.5 (PL-20220001042) NIM DOCUMENTS Packet Pg. 90 9.B.5 NIM SUMMARY Haven at North Naples MPUD (PL-20220001042) Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL-20220001043) Monday, September 26, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County Public Library Headquarters, Sugden Theater 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL 34109 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Haven at North Naples MPUD (f/k/a The Grove MPUD (PL-20220001042) —The property is zoned A — Agricultural. This is a request to rezone the property to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65. 2. Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL-20220001043) — The land use designation is currently Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. This is a request for a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to create the Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Attendees On behalf of Applicants: Blake Basye, Johnson Development Associates, Inc. (Applicant) Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman Yovanovich Koester, PA Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, Inc. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Tim Hall, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Kevin Dowty, PE, Hole Montes, Inc. County Staff: Raymond Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services One hundred fifty-three members of the public attended. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the property owner, the other consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history and overview of the project. The following comments/questions were raised by the members of the public in attendance: Page 1 of 3 HA2022\2022026\WP\NIM\NIM Summary (11-18-2022) rjm.docx Packet Pg. 91 9.B.5 Traffic Concerns were raised regarding the traffic the proposed development would generate, especially on Orange Blossom Drive and related to additional u-turn movements from traffic exiting the project southbound on Airport Road and u-turning to proceed northbound. Additional questions were asked about the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) and how the trips are calculated. Mr. Trebilcock explained how the traffic analysis is developed, in accordance with Collier County requirements. There were concerns expressed about Orange Blossom Drive being expanded to four lanes in the future; however, this is highly unlikely as Collier County has specific policies in place not to expand Orange Blossom. Access Questions were asked regarding the access points for the proposed project. There two existing access points: an egress only right turn onto Orange Blossom Drive; and an ingress/egress to Airport -Pulling Road. The access to Orange Blossom Drive will remain in place and provides will continue to only provide egress (to Orange Blossom) for the Carlisle. The proposed multifamily development in Tract B will not have access to the aforementioned egress. The applicant has committed that the access to Orange Blossom will not be accessible to development in Tract B. An additional egress only right turn onto Airport -Pulling Road is proposed to help alleviate traffic exiting the proposed multi -family development. There will be no connection Yarberry Lane or Anthony Court. Design Questions were asked regarding the design of the project. The zoned building height requested is 60', not to exceed five stories. Parking will be located along the reconfigured, Airport -Pulling Road access and within the proposed development, to support of the Carlisle, which is presently leasing space for parking form the Italian American Club. The proposed development will be designed to meet the parking space requirements in the Land Development code. There is no expansion of the Carlisle proposed. Carlisle. The proposed development will be designed to utilize underground storage chambers to hold stormwater, which will connect to the existing stormwater and outfall system. Although it is too early in the process to provide specific details, based on current market trends the developer estimates that 50% of the units will be one bedroom, 40% two bedrooms, and 10% three bedrooms. Affordable Housing Units Questions were raised regarding the proposed affordable housing units. The rent for these units will be calculated using Collier County affordable housing formulas, which are based on the annual median income (AMI) for Collier County. An Affordable Housing Density Bonus agreement will be drafted as part of this application process and go to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. If approved, as part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units, in a format approved by Collier County staff. The developer will also agree to annual on - Page 2 of 3 HA2022\2022026\WP\N1M\NIM Summary (11-18-2022) rjm.doex Packet Pg. 92 9.B.5 site monitoring by the County. The income percentages proposed for the affordable housing units will allow for teachers and firefighters to qualify (also referend to as workforce housing). Misc. Due to attendance, questions were asked regarding a second NIM at a later date. Mr. Mulhere offered to hold a second session that night. There was no interest from the members of the public in a second session that night. The team also offered to meet with representatives of the various HOA's. Questions were asked about the developer trying to purchase parcels to the west. The developer looked at that option with the understanding that there would be no access there, but there is no contract to purchase those properties. This project does not include those properties. Questions were asked about the application process and timing. The first review is complete. We anticipate another substantive review, and another minor review after that. We expect to be scheduled for hearing with the Collier County Planning Commission in February or March 2023; and the Board of County Commissioners about a month after that. Questions were asked about other Johnson Development projects in Collier County. Lago Apartments, located at the northeastern intersection of Radio Road and Livingston Road is a Johnson Development property. The meeting concluded at approximately 7:20 PM. Page 3 of 3 H:\2022\2022026\WP\NIM\NIM Summary (11-18-2022) rjm.doex Packet Pg. 93 9.B.5 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature of Applicanf STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 26" day of September 2022 by means of 'physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP. President/CEO of Hole Montes_,_Inc., who is personally known to me "r or who has produced as identification. A&UMUOA 4 Signal ofNotary Public �A Vi1L C�LtYL E Printed'Name of Notary (Notary Seal) STEPHANIE KARO]Fiorlda? Notary Public - State ofCommission N GG 96My Comm. Expires Mar Bonded through National Not H:U022L20220261WP\N1MWfidavit of Compliance (9-26-2022).doe Packet Pg. 94 9.B.5 The public Is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert ,1. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A, on behalf of the applicant at the following time and location: Monday, September 26, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County Public Library Headquarters, Sugden Theater" 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, Florida 34109 *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. The following companion applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management: 1. Haven at North Naples MPUD (f/k/a The Grove MPUD (PL20220001042) — The property is zoned A — Agricultural, This is a request to rezone the property to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65, 2. Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL-20220001043) — The land use designation is currently Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. This is a request for a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSG MPA) to create the Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65. The subject property is 27.78t acres and located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section 2, Township 49, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. Location Map Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict ►eoEaNvs Haven at North Naples MPUD WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and Collier County staff. Zoom is being provided as an option to those electing not to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to paiticipate via Zoom or view a video of the met Ling, please u1 nail us at NeighborhoodMeeting@hmeng.corn and we will send a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeeting@ hmeno.com. Please reference Haven at North Naples MPUD! Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict in subject line. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000, email: bobmulhere@hmeng.com Packet Pg. 95 9.B.5 IRM HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS PLANTJERS • SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way • Naples, Florida 34110 • Phone 239.254.2000 - Fax: 239.254.2099 September 9, 2022 Re: Haven at North Naples (flkla The Grove) MPUD (PL-20220001142) Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL-20220001043) HM File No. 2022.026 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant, have filed the following formal companion applications with Collier County Growth Management Department: 1. Haven at North Naples MPUD (Vk/a The Grove MPUD (PL-20220001042) — The property is zoned A — Agricultural. This is a request to rezone the property to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65. 2. Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL-20220001043) — The land use designation is currently Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. This is a request for a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to create the Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65. The subject property is 27.78t acres and located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section 2, Township 49S, Range 25E, Collier County, Florida. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, September 26, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier County Public Library Headquarters, Sugden Theater* 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, Florida 341.09. .Zoom is being provided as an option to those electing not to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeighborhoodMeeting@—hmene.com and we will send a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMecting@hmeng.com. Please reference Haven at North Naples MPUD/Airport Carlisle MU Subdistrict in subject line. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP President/CEO RJMlsek *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. Naples • Fort Myers Packet Pg. 96 09G9/09G90 108Ad Danz algljzdwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z jzuJJof ap atlad413 09 G8/09 G90 AJaAd gjIM alglied woo „9/9 Z x „ j azis lagzl 6626 YARBARRY LAND TRUST 6630 YARBERRY LAND TRUST 2670 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH 2670 AIRPORT ROAD S NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 AIRPORT PULLING WINDWARD ISLE HOA % PRECEDENT HOSPITALITY & PROPERTY MGMT 300A EXECUTIVE # 260 CLEARWATER, FL 33762 --- 0 ALMAGUER, LIENYS ESTEBAN DIAZ 7242 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 ANTHONY, ORSIE 2373 ANTHONY CT NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6812 BARTOLEC, BRIAN SHANNON LEE BARTOLEC 682S IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6818 BOHYER FIR, GARY A & JUDITH BOHYER FAMILY TRUST UTD 12/23/2010 7287 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 I BOUCHARD, ISABELLA 7263 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 3,1109 --- 0 CAPES, DANIEL K & LARA W 7226 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 1771 CCP HOMES LLC S46 94TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 333S TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 AIRPORT PULLING WINDWARD ISLE AIRPORT PULLING WINDWARD ISLE HOA HOA PRECEDENT HOSPITALITY & - % PRECEDENT HOSPITALITY & PROPERTY MGMT PROPERTY MGMT 300A EXECUTIVE # 260 300A EXECUTIVE # 260 CLEARWATER, FL 33762 --- 0 CLEARWATER, FL 33762 --- 0 ANTHONY, AUDREY A ANTHONY, CORETTA S SS9 14TH ST N 9604 LAKE HUGH DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 3429 I GOTHA, FL 34734---0 AVERY SO, HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC % PEGASUS PROP MANAGEMENT 8840TERRENE CT# 102 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 3413S --- 0 BEHLE, EGON 6892 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 BORSENIK, DALE H ELLEN M NOWACKI 6820 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6807 BRISSON, GREGORY A & CAREY L 6877 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6818 CCK INVESTMENTS LLC 6461 SANDALWOOD LANE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 CHAPMAN, MICHAEL 6900 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 288S HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 �I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery °5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 BARTH, JEFFREY JOHN JAMIE ANN BARTH 68731L REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 BISCARDI, JOSEPH & CHRISTINE A 6886 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---6807 BOTSKO, MARLA 6901 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 BURMEISTER, TODD & KATHLEEN 6481 AUTUMN WOODS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 CCK INVESTMENTS LLC 6461 SANDALWOOD LANE NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY %CENTURYLINK ATTN:PROPERTY TAX DEPT 102S ELDORADO BLVD BROOMFIELD, CO 80021 --- 0 COLLIER COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC 6710 LONE OAK BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6834 Packet Pg. 97 09G9/09G90 AJaAV oaAB olglJedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z tewiof op gmPit] 09!G2/09 Gge AnAd ql!m olgltedwoo „gig Z x,,) ozls legel CONNOLLY, DONALD J & DONNA COTTON, SYLVESTER 8057 SAN VISTA CIRCLE 2337 ANTHONY CT NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES; FL 34109--- 6812 DELRE, RONALD A MICHELE CIBER 6829 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6818 DOONEY JR, THOMAS 6861 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---6818 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N # 8 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 7300 FOLZ II, JOHN P DEENA FOLZ 7118 N BARNSBURY LAND NAPLES, FL 34109--- 1980 G & N ALTHAUS FAMILY TRUST 7327 MILL POND CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 HEINRICH FAMILY REVTRUST 7199 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 HETRICK, NORMAJ 844 WOODMONT RD ANNAPOLIS, MO 21401 --- 0 JAYARAMAN, BARANI R JEYANTHI ETHIRAJAN 7335 MILL POND CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 LAM, HIEU T LYNN H LE 7114 BARNSBURY LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DENICOLA, THOMAS & LILLIAN 6885 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6818 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC %AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N # 8 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 7300 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGTENT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N # 8 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 7300 FULCHER JR, GENE & ANDREA 7215 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 1772 GLICK, LAWRENCE F & DEBORAH Z 6841 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 HERRING ET AL, CHARLES E JOHN E CRIMMELTRUST SHARON T CRIMMELTRUST WHITLEY S WARD 2171 FORREST LN NAPLES, FL 34102---0 IL REGALO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC MOORE PROPERTY MG MT LLC 5603 NAPLES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109---0 KAMINSKI, PAUL 6823 MANGROVE AVE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 LANGELOH, JAMES & TINA 6817 IL REGALO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 DONNA JEAN MORAN REV TRUST 6857 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6818 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N # 8 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 7300 FLA SUCCESS LLC 28 SHERWOOD GATE OYSTER BAY, NY 11771 --- 0 FURLAN, RAFAELSANDINI VALERIA STADLER 6836 II REGALO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 GUNTHER, CURTIS & MELINDA 6828 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6807 HERRMANN, MICHAEL & MARY L 6815 MANGROVE AVE NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6822 IL REGALO HOMEOWNERS MOORE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 5603 NAPLES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109---0 KELLUM, GLENDA H & A NEAL 6905 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES., FL 34109 --- 0 LARRY A MCCOMMON REV TRUST 6889 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---6818 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery @5160/81160 Packet Pg. 98 Em Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery °5160/8160 09l.8/0919® AJaAV oaAB alggedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z leuJJo} ap al1@0113 09G8/09 LSo AJaAV yflm alglfedwoo „g/S Z x „ j azls lagei LENNOX, JAMES B & DIANE P LIBERTY LAND TRUST 7110 BARNSBURY LN 6865 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 016�D UIKOVIC, SAFEDIN SUZANA UIKOVIC 6897 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 LUTGERT IVIED CENTER LLC LYNN TR, LOIS M & L LAVERY REV TRUST 4850 TAMIAMIA TRAIL N CHILDREN OF A D REECE TRUST 309 NEAPOLITAN WAY SUITE 200 1730 W BELFAST ST NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34103 0 MESA, AZ 85201--- 6138 I MCNARY, JAMES K & MARY B i MCNELIS, DEENA METJAHIE, EDITA 69360 FAIR OAKS LANE 6822 MANGROVE AVE ! 16 JEAN PLACE COVINGTONQMA, LA 70434---0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 SYOSSET, NY 11791 --- 0 M(CHAELI SANTI LIVING TRUST MICHAELJ SHERMAN IRREVTRUST MODES, CHARISSA 6821 IL REGALO CIRCLE % FRANCES SHERMAN % 6849 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 6897 GRENADIER BLVD # 1401 NAPLES, FL 34109 6818 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 i it MONROE, DOUGLAS S & CINDY S MORGNER, TIMOTHY R MORSTEIN, CARLA & STEPHEN 6819 MANGROVE AVE MICHELLE L MORGNER 7231 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 6869 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---1772 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 i NAPLES ITALIAN-AMERICAN CLUB i _ 1 NASH, JO ELLEN OASIS NAPLES APARTMENTS LLC FOUNDATION INC 7279 MILL POND CIR 300 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 7035-7037 AIRPORT RD N NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 STE 245 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 1709 ATTN THOMAS MILLER j � EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 --- 0 ORTSAC INVESTMENTS MF 22 LLC I i i PALMER, ADAM & JENNIFER PETTI, MARK D & KIMBERLY J 1314 E LAS OLAS BLVD #1111 6833 IL REGALO CIR 6845 IL REGALO CIRCLE FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6818 ( NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 PULLING SR ET AL JOHN A R L & R C HOFBAUER TRUST REITER, LISA ANN JOHN A PULLING JR TRUST 3634 SUNRISE DR 7239 MILL POND CIR MARSHA FORD PULLING TRUST SEBRING, FL 33872 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 1772 FINCH FIRST 2012 IRREV TRUST 13524 CORONADO DR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 REYES, CRISTOBAL i ROTHCOAST PROPERTIES LLC ROTHCOAST PROPERTIES LLC 7210 MILL POND CIR 328 CARLTON PLACE 328 CARLTON PLACE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 I i i NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 SANTANGELO, JENNA SEYEZ, PETER F & BARBARA D SLOAN, ALAN & RENEE 6826 MANGROVE AVE 7247 MILLPOND CIR 7196 MILL POND CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ® Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 99 SRG CN FL LLC HARBERT MANAGEMENT CORP 200 CRESCENT CT SUITE 440 DALLAS, TX 75201 --- 0 TOOMEY, SHARON 7218 MILL POND CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 1771 WALCOTT, MICHAEL W JENNIFER C WALCOTT 7204 MILL POND CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 0918/09190 AJ9AV oaAe algi}edwoo ww Lg x ww qZ }ew)of ap all@Rbi}g 0918/0915®fJaAV qj!m algl}edwoo „g/g Z x „[ azls label TEDER,JORDAN E 14230 WILD TIMBER CT ESTERO, FL 33928 --- 0 WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDG COMMONS AREA ASSOCIATION INC SUNBURST MGMT CORP PO BOX 110339 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 106 YARBERRY, MARY LOUISE 6634 YARBERRY LN NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6820 TOP HAT IMPORTED LLC 6780 N AIRPORT RD NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 WALDEN OAKS OF NAPLES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 6755 LONE OAK BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6815 WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDG COMMONS AREA ASSOCIATION INC SUNBURST MGMT CORP PO BOX 110339 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 106 9.B.5 o v TEDER, KEVIN G 6814 MANGROVE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 ULIZIO, MICHAEL & WENDI 6893 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 6818 i i WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDG COMMONS AREA ASSOCIATION INC SUNBURST MGMT CORP ' PO BOX 110339 NAPLES, FL 34108---106 i i WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDGS COMMONS AREA ASSOCIATION INC SUNBURST MGMT CORP j PO BOX 110339 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 106 i I Airport Pulling Windward Isle Walden Oaks of Naples Homeowners' Assoc., Inc. Homeowners Assoc., Inc. c/o Precedent Hospitality & Property Mgmt. c/o Ability Management 3001 Executive Drive Suite 260 6736 Lone Oak Blvd Clearwater, FL 33762 Naples, FI 34109 �I lil it i i i t i it t i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 100 9.B.5 Stwo PART OFTHB USA TODAY NErrWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HOLE MONTES ASSOCIATES INC 950 ENCORE WAY NAPLES, Ft. 34110 ATTN STEPHANIE KAROL Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Dally News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published In said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News Is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 9/9/2022 Subscribed and sworn to before on September 9th, 2022 4A, Notary, State of WI, County of Brown My commission expires: PUBLICATION COST: $1,008.00 KATHLEEN ALLEN AD No:GC10939808 Notary Public CUSTOMER NO: 530712 State of Wisconsin POH: PUBLIC NOTICE AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD W MAP Packet Pg. 101 9.B.5 The public Is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEQ of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D, Yovanovic.h, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant at the following time and location: Monday, September 26, 2022 at 5.30 p.m. Collier County Public Library Headquarters, Sugden Theater' 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, Florida 34109 *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. The following companion applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management: 1. Haven at North Naples MPUD (f/k/a The Grove MPUD (PL20220001042) — The property is zoned A _ Agricultural. This is a request to rezone the property to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development. (MPUD) to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65. 2. Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL-2022000.1043) — The land use designation is currently Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. This is a request: for a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to create the Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units with some affordable housing and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65, The subject property is 27.78t acres and located in the southwest quadrant of the Intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section 2, Township 49, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. A Location Map it t Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict FtdLBMQNTE$i Haven at North. Naples MPUD WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and Collier County staff. Zoom is being provided as an option to those electing not to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate. via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, Please ornail u. ; at.NeighborhoodMeetinq@hmenci.com and we will send a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeeting@ hmeng.com. Please reference Haven at North Naples MPUD/ Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict in subject line. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, Inc. 95.0 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000, email: bobmulhere@hmeng.com Packet Pg. 102 m CA a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y EP C � C R1 N O 73 cu @ � C � N � @� � Qj 3 CL ❑ C N L u ❑ ❑. (vra `❑ 71 E � w C O m m 0 0 0 a x v +� CL ❑ y m ju -0 -0 ro ' °) Ln m� CvwLA ❑ N C it C O C V @ Y N a v 42 ro��ro ,t.In� a E E EL N V O L +L+ N to a ,C C C 6 f0 Ei m ` N prop a aQj d M. a - a. a� IS y @ u 4 O ❑ C h a � ❑ v C C (1 CL ❑ @ fp @ � U N G m E � � r U u 0o ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y �JJ + I' PP rl C C M ��, ❑ t ;L- ,`- m -p Nl N L U1 O N u ^J ❑ ++ r E 3 c, o c m ,u E is E ❑ o E o o a ❑ f6 O ++ Ln i `a 'ten Z, ❑ N C U Eon V G s+ V f0 ' a O O ru 7• •C f4 3 Ol 19 tll N r m°n p ai Si 0 ❑. E E C N L Q L hoo=o a �l ❑ Q 7 7 ❑ 5 N ❑ G C ❑ w ❑ C N y� N o a ❑ v 0 ❑ ._ N � u N _ G fL ❑ [0 m N N Y (n cu `1 ❑ -❑ Ql C cu G � E � r u R� le 0 d m Y V R d 0o ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoejjv C " C @ ❑ t w �. u '❑ f0 h 7� N C m 7 CD �O C o NU o Ev e _'04� C ❑ r CA '3 p ❑ E 0 N Y Ln w ❑ a r WJ3w 0 E ❑ w CD C ❑ CV a v o at -13 N Uj C) fa N @ ❑ ❑ N j--j y�� t i iT7 x N 7 T ❑ Wj P� 64 U ❑ Y 7 Ql a,)4 Q, 7 �O u , ❑ N o { co @ w ICI okra w al Y N Li a�54 w v° en o �I 'a m a ,,u o rC �, on v a ❑ C0 a a, c O N �I u '- ` 00. N d J N r rL y C G7 0. ❑ `m @ `XJ N o N } a v w S m E ❑ _r_, r U In 0 d m Y V R d 0o ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad BuluOZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y d Jr C N C �. f6 u N N � m � C N W ^1 o ��U o E�,v oCA N_ N s ,^ a � x v m +� C o O1 N u E I•.�� r-q CD -0 E O N iI9 �7 l N L a0 W off-' y rc a� �4.x N 01 3 '1 HN L VI LT+ oyc U) �Tm. �� W �m❑(tj c) w U Eootw H R. 7 ,� V v� V ai 3 y c ra IUD o V . 'fl C � i1i !may � o a a CLEE� V1 L ❑ Ol G1 JE +L+ O �"0B E Z ] m y Vi O �! r rl % 0 C a�+ 6 V ❑ c 00. ❑ N y ❑ a u L is � w N � V y a CL C cu Q i }y ❑ ru n% �Q vi G N 7 Ln � � u E v o� c a, E ❑ to 0 d m Y V R d 0o ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad BuluOZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y � v ° rp i ❑ t w u aal his C � 7- O H tJl � Q �mv H N c m C7 ❑ v 3 [`i a C N di Ln ° m m �I� O � Ln L u E `1 0 E ❑ o 0 a �oo0 CL O m a m a Un m ro a m LO ) o" P-4 Wp4N U. room 0 a 't57 C ° C ❑ E u a��rN c oQW W Q c moCL x�aA pL 7 C C =0•mo p C d V i ru U m v � ❑ „IV u U ° C ❑ P-I v d 7'• = u 7 u 9 F,y ❑ t6 m OQ 4n ° NN � R � U a 12 w w C N C � L U 0o ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y C Q1 C Y 4 w � f0 ❑ C y 67 7 L � N U v' Q � a 0c vau� o 0 N CO C p 6 O 81 t W + nt N m @ a v � in L n B N +• m a w E o o n4 0. 7 0 y C C � y tm a _ u p C O R F E Q y Q] 4+ Y tw G C C C OD M D i3 SO w y u j ❑ a c ca �, 'ro ID rc C u � ❑ D C N V a r C 0 L1 L = V y V y c O1 ❑ 6 M y ❑ NN � v a U v � v � C � C 00 0 d m Y V R d a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y �� F = 0] _ M ❑ t ro � � C y 41 ❑ � N U E L G tf r v w ro s � 3 LL fl C N t Y ❑ �E°w Mom[ C ❑ G❑ ° O 91 -C N A! C_ 0 r m 0 N m ro p -�_� �_ci O ro Q ❑ w = �ic 0 C Ir U @ov o to u G m 7 OJ a. 7 w � a 0 m 0 _ m (u O G Q ¢, E Q qj qj bA ❑ _ C by [G ° m "U 40 r- � � rGn a 7 y V 7 ❑ 0 C 7 u T co L) c u m ❑ ❑ C 3 +. 4 D '2 S ❑ 7 Y y ❑ 3 wu to U IA CL G • q`1 CL ❑ m ro N d N 7 m � u � O1 v G (LE 7 G O ❑ F L U c) 0 d m Y V R d 0o ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad BuluOZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y 'd{ 0 0 0 N N O CD N �o. > rCn � ` rU) va A� I� H c� a � hml UrO Z Vl o z Z 0 C �] C t!aj 10 4 � a � C N 0 7 p N U � � N Q7 [0 }+ n0 o H O N �wu-13 G c p o 0 �t my y v) S9 m p X- m caow I`osho -U 8 M 1 L=] 3 w t ro m aci = m ti r'u t; m , v p ai : o ar=E� �E�v Y a W i+ � = o C bo [o -0m4-v m m Q 3 j U 7 ti E tZ m G ra C Cr O u O o N a 3 -0 N V ` 4 v ❑ T H � u �n — M CL = ai a ❑ r`o m w � � u .4 aj ar+ al C y E a 0 0o ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y I r G � C r r o w to N � � yr v• 4 � CL a C N ❑ al � p1 W u a 0 0 C O p OO ❑ Q� vro ry m o v 73 s `p M p 61 N N c v mLh $ N C £ 3 0 u � � � tLo O Y 7 41 CL d r u- V � W t U w � tit ru m t; G7 f+ U W a a c C d E a. N C C N L � 7 �o=I-- C da m G 16CU4=� �0 3 y u Ll V 0 _ H a u `- i w u v T N :6 u N 7 C Q; C, Q m N N y u b �1 m 7+ � � Y r� G d r 4 H J-- u m ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;d ■i c � � 'ro u ❑ ul In v � y M ❑ N U _E CL ❑ C �i P N ❑ ra a] d u E - n a C C C �Qoa a) t Ol i+ CL Y @ y 10 -0 xs 131 0 ❑ x ¢:3 r u C N - @ u N 3 C C bA In 16 OJ � f0 al +• � ,m ❑ N C O ` CLE p. H E a w u 0 W i+ � C to ❑ C � @ 4= hA G 7 = p •� C ❑ ' C V � ❑ ❑ V � G N � 7 8 N ❑ N fl b L p p N 73 u a CL C cu Q' ❑ IA WVf 7 @ V r yam- @ Or�+1 C Ol C M � r u v cn � l � m L64. N � v '� LA n1 tr- 4� v] iTl` � � A N NJ 1 v� • R � V W cc Z , "'I q o L N a 0 m a m ci a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y C7 W 0 0 FBI A 0 0 �I V H YIL�J C � C cv C @ � � � C � � U a � m m � r E m a ❑ c t Y v N ❑ 5-E E °w [7 3 C C Fuoo0 CL r � co ul cc_42 ❑ ❑ +' W C b� 7- t ❑ "j E04� u C Y 3 ❑ E N n w u yam„ X � ❑ 7 T N C G I h b N N �m�� v o E v E s. _n L ❑ L 41 N t o _ tlo ro 0 u j rc G U Ql ❑ u ❑ C ❑ N n '2 ❑ C u v 7 NZ u N = 73 cu m ❑ fp w N o m n i4 tl] •� a F v C w E a � 0 u a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;d ►a �i G N G M p t ❑ 47 v L N T m � � N Q) :3 `a c E m a t E 3 a o � N = Y ❑ m O u m `m E L a E O p E p a Q v C m m yal 7 f0 -0 a r Z, ❑°' U E o r .15 v !� 7 ..� Y 0 E o] 'd 7 _ u V n to W P N C 2 �1 " • E w C d N icy Cq ❑ C C G w m Q v m y ro �. 10 U.0 ro ❑. 3 ❑ a C 7 ci v >, V ❑ � C , ❑ L] L U N � U N C m a ❑ m Co no nn � � V -a 41 arl C N r ❑ � 0 U Jlk L Q ■ V7 W rL m n'� U J N h of -o 4 Vtij] 1 ' J l� a m V m a a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;d F= rai I 41 C M ❑ L❑.i � ra N N � � Y C v a E 3 rL t N Y ❑ v cu a m u E L v E Co C ❑ C p ❑ ❑ vm v �_ ❑ a is t a m ❑ N � E a Q to C} C @ Y � -0 CL QI = C V � ❑ 7 N C C 40 N Q _ 2 C. E D. N L 0 S 41 ; G4 ❑ C C C W rc p a m w rLa >- a hp i U P ❑ 3 } V ❑ � C ❑ 3 U i � [7 d T � � V N 7 G cu R. ❑ m m N � ` V N C .e ❑ U J a pl a J u u; S t a N t%r\ 4� a G 1 J C� Q1 L (-�F- LO a m m a a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;d W z 0 0 A 0 0 F•"I w WE a a1 C ro aC. O t m y ` 7 p N E U N C -13 •p Q1 m y= A E rx 0 C vi t Y Q ayi a1 u E Q E ❑ o C Q m w IO E000 cu ai �s �G f0 y N @ @ SO -C; a r w 'a m H. } y w E Ny C v W 7 5 N 2' Q C GO t Q m a m Eoo� uV�_ Q C' 0 U L 0 = N Y @ V w 7 N m�� ra s y C 9} Nw d � Y y C C C hQq 'm ❑ v L rt, 41 U �a ; V T i Q C � Y u O y � C 7 Q L 7 +' Q N o "Q aj .L,w N A u CL � v � ❑ @ ro N b h 7 @ y U i o � ,c a ❑ a1 E 0 H 0 U cn KD 11I i 4 N J � U �x N a tv 2 a m m a a41 ZVOWOOZZOZId - uol;I;ad 6uiuoZ : 96Z5Z) s;uawnooa WIN (ZVUOOOZZOZ--jd) - a uv :;uauayoe;;'y r C N C +' ❑ N L w. Q rt] y Q C p N U y w i� ❑ a 'tl p 2 t �y -16 ❑ N 07 R N OJ u E L O o 0 � � C Q Q. C O C CD WW 0 rhy h �I v a c is CA CD W a ru ITU N C 7 Q ai wad 2=m� W a ❑ a � W 7 a u Vl N L rj ITj Imo+ t•rl Icy 47 w 3 43 � 10 b0 � N E a Imo[ l ❑ m w `� CA� I�'�I � O '� ❑ C y � N ❑ ❑ C 3 s+ U ❑ � C ❑ N i C a 4 ❑ N ❑ F ry V cli � 11 N Z a CL di I� o m ro N C � � ❑ VI 7 LF) R V -13 i wP � G O1 C v E O 0 U — �� --L--L— — — — —L — --L--L--] 9.B.6 LauraDeJohnVEN From: BosiMichael Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 4:35 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN; GiblinCormac; HarringtonSarah Cc: Ashton Heidi; PerryDerek Subject: FW: PUD language -affordable housing units For your review from Ms. Flagg related to the Haven MPUD request. Thanks, mike From: Diane Flagg <diane.flagg@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 4:14 PM To: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Linda Penniman <Ispenniman@gmail.com> Subject: PUD language -affordable housing units EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mike, Linda Penniman and I met with the County Manager in regard to PUD language and the request by developers for additional density based on the provision of affordable housing units. As discussed previously, the current PUD language utilized is either unenforceable or incomplete. For example, the 30 year commitment does not 'run with the land'. If the development is sold, an encumbrance on the land for affordable units does not exist. Additionally, there is no specificity on type of unit (lbedroom, 2 bedroom) etc. The County Manager asked us to develop draft language for use by all future PUD's starting with the Haven. Fli c One of our attorneys in the group has suggested the following language for the PUD's since 2.06.01 D. 1 allows the application process outlining the affordable housing commitment and specifications to be completed in conjunction with the PUD process. This thereby avoids the extra step of a pre -application process. O 0 When you get a minute, please review the proposed language and advise whether there is any reason this shouldn't be the standard PUD language if a developer proposes to provide affordable housing units. J Except as expressly so provided and cited as being excluded or not applicable in this PUD ordinance all w provisions of the Land Development Code, including but not limited to section 2.06 relative to affordable a housing density bonuses, and of any other County ordinances or regulations are and shall be applicable to the development approved by this PUD ordinance. E Thanks so much, a Diane.Flagg@att.net 239.784.5580 Packet Pg. 118 9.B.6 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 119 pn bu County staff advised that they will recommend approval of `The Haven' because of the affordable housing commitment. County staff revised `The Haven's" proposed GMPA and MPUD Ordinance to include other LDC regulations, however County staff DID NOT revise the GMPA or MPUD Ordinance to include the affordable housing regulation, LDC 2.06; arguably the most essential regulation. Shouldn't this be a decision by the County Commissioners? `The Haven' proposed MPUD Ordinance exempts the developer from the Commissioner's 11 page regulation for affordable housing, LDC 2.06, and substitutes 2 paragraphs that are incomplete and/or unenforceable. The Haven proposed MPUD Ordinance commitment for affordable housing excludes the total number of affordable housing units categorized by: Household income level ® Number of bedrooms (one -bedroom, two -bedroom, three bedrooms etc). A recent presentation by the Community Foundation indicated the greatest need was affordable housing for families o Rental units ® Owner -occupied units The Haven proposed MPUD Ordinance commitment for affordable housing also excludes: m Process for annual income verification and certification Price and conditions under which an owner -occupied unit will be sold ® A lien instrument to be recorded with the Clerk of Courts if an affordable unit is sold within 30 years. ® The ratio of number of bedrooms per affordable housing unit shall be equal to the ratio of number of bedrooms per residential unit for entire development An agreement that constitutes the covenants, restrictions, and conditions which run with the land and shall be binding upon the property and everyone having any interest therein at any time and from time to time. o Recordation of the agreement in the official records of Collier County, Florida, subsequent to the recordation of the grant deed pursuant to which the developer acquires fee simple title to the property. Random inspections to verify occupancy in accordance with the commitment. Process for violations e.g. affordable unit rented at full market rate Process for criminal enforcement Process for civil enforcement Packet Pg. 120 9.B.6 The Haven proposes to build 336 multi -family dwelling units on 14.57 acres; Tract B. This is a density of 23.06 dwelling units per acre. The Carlisle Naples is a senior independent and assisted living facility and is located on Tract A. The Commissioner's Growth Management Plan: Y The property owner, by right, is entitled to 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. ® If the Commissioners, by a super -majority vote, agree to change the Zoning, the property owner is eligible for a MAXIMUM of 4 dwelling units per acre or 59 units. ® If the developer provides affordable housing units, the property owner is eligible for a MAXIMUM of 10 dwelling units per acre or 146 units. `The Haven' Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) proposes to exempt the development from the Commissioner's Growth Management Plan. `The Haven" Mixed - Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Ordinance proposes to exempt the development from the Commissioner's Land Development Code (LDC) regulations. It is allowable IF 4 of 5 Commissioners agree, but is it wise considering the far-reaching and deleterious impact on the residents, infrastructure, and those who need affordable workforce housing? The residents of the Orange Blossom Alliance, representing more than 3000 households, request the County Commissioners DENY The Haven At North Naples proposed GMPA and MPUD Ordinance. Packet Pg. 121 9.B.6 LauraDeJohnVEN From: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 10:56 AM To: LauraDeJohnVEN Cc: Tony Kinnear; Melinda Gunther, Diane Flagg; Ann Renner Subject: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) & Lutgert Medical Building Attachments: Lutgert Medical Building- NaplesDailyNews Neighborhood Information Meeting.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Laura, the leaders from the Orange Blossom/Airport Rd. Alliance are set to meet with the staff tomorrow, Thursday, 2/16 at 2:00 PM. Please confirm who we will be meeting with. In addition to getting updates on The Haven project, would it be possible to get an update/timing/site plan/renderings on the proposed rezoning for the Lutgert Medical Building, which is on the adjacent parcel. See the attached notice for March 1st neighborhood information meeting. The residents of the Orange Blossom/Airport Rd Corridor need to understand and are VERY CONCERED about the potential impact of BOTH of these complexes, which are both much larger than the neighboring buildings and are being proposed in an already densely populated and highly congested area. We already have 1,680 signatures on a petition opposing the Haven project which all residents of the area believe is an inappropriate size (336 units on 10 acres) and is a tipping point project which will set a new precedent for much larger buildings than exist today and will just worsen the overall congestion, road safety, school overcrowding, emergency services of the area. For the Haven at North Naples Rezoning Request, we would like to discuss the following: • Timetable for this going to the Planning Commission & County Commissioners. • Can we get a time certain status for the discussion of this project at the commissioners meeting? • Review of current site plan, renderings and density for this project. • Review the current plan for reworking Airport Rd to accommodate the large increase in traffic for the ingress/egress for both the Haven and the Lutgert Medical Building. • Issues the staff is still reviewing with regard to this project. • Review the staff's thoughts on the compatibility/suitability of this much larger project with the neighboring lower height and lower density buildings. • Review and discuss the developer's application for the density bonus for the affordable housing component required per the land development code. • Review and discuss the developer's plan for underground water storage for this complex. Thank you for your time tomorrow. We will be able to share this information with the concerned residents of the nearby 15 residential communities along Orange Blossom and Airport Rd. Let me know if you have any questions. Dave Packet Pg. 122 9.B.6 Dave Renner Premier Sotheby's International Realty 4300 Gulf Shore Blvd. N., Suite 1001 Naples, FL 34103 c 239.784.5552 1 Venetian Village Office dave.renner@premiersir.com Renners2.com Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram From: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 4:25 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@col liercountyfl.gov> Cc: Tony Kinnear <tkinnear@gmail.com>; Melinda Gunther <melinda.gunther@premiersir.com>; Diane Flagg <diane.flagg@att.net>; Ann Renner <annrenner.naples@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) Thank You, we look forward to meeting you there. Dave Renner Premier Sotheby's International Realty 4300 Gulf Shore Blvd. N., Suite 1001 Naples, FL 34103 c 239.784.5552 1 Venetian Village Office dave.renner@premiersir.com Renners2.com Follow us on Facebook Follow us of Instagram From: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 4:22 PM To: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Subject: RE: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) Yes, confirmed for Thurs. Feb 16 at 2:00, in -person meeting at Collier County Growth Management building on 2800 North Horseshoe Rd - Conference Room C. Laura Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239) 252-5587 laura.dejohn0colliercountyfl.gov Packet Pg. 123 9.B.6 From: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 4:20 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Laura, please confirm we are set for our meeting on Thursday, Feb. 16t" at 2:00 PM. Thanks. Dave Renner Premier Sotheby's International Realty 4300 Gulf Shore Blvd. N., Suite 1001 Naples, FL 34103 c 239.784.5552 1 Venetian Village Office dave.renner@premiersir.com Renners2.com Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Instaaram From: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 2:57 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Ann Renner <annrenner.naples@gmail.com>; Tony Kinnear <tkinnear@gmail.com>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountvfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountvfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountvfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountvfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) Laura, Thursday, February 16t" at 2:00 PM is perfect. Thank you for confirming. We can meet in person at your office. We appreciate your time during this very busy time for all. Dave Dave Renner Premier Sotheby's International Realty 4300 Gulf Shore Blvd. N., Suite 1001 Naples, FL 34103 c 239.784.5552 1 Venetian Village Office dave.renner@premiersir.com Renners2.com Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Instaaram From: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2023 9:59 AM To: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Packet Pg. 124 9.B.6 Cc: Ann Renner <annrenner.naples@gmail.com>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) Dave, Here are some available times for meeting, let us know your preference: Wednesday, Feb. 15 at 9:00 or 10:00 Thursday, Feb. 16 at 2:00 or later Would you like the meeting to be in a conference room at the Growth Management office (2800 North Horseshoe Drive), or virtual (Zoom)? Thank you, Laura Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239) 252-5587 laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov From: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 1:14 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Ann Renner <annrenner.naples@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Laura, thanks for getting back to me. If we could meet sometime in person during the week of February 13th, that would be great. I will confirm schedules, but here are the probable attendees from the Orange Blossom Alliance Leadership Team: Dave Renner- dave.renner(a)premiersir.com Tony Kinnear- tkinnear@gmail.com Melinda Gunther- melinda.gunther@premiersir.com Ann Renner- annrenner.naples gmail.com Please provide a day and time that would work for you. Dave Renner Premier Sotheby's International Realty 4300 Gulf Shore Blvd. N., Suite 1001 Naples, FL 34103 c 239.784.5552 1 Venetian Village Office dave.renner@premiersir.com Renners2.com Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Instaaram Packet Pg. 125 9.B.6 From: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 3:45 PM To: Dave Renner <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Cc: annrenner.naples@gmail.com <annrenner.naples@gmail.com>; tkinnear@gmail.com <tkinnear@gmail.com>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountvfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountvfl.gov>; MarcellaJeanne <Jeanne.Marcella@colliercountvfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colIiercountyfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: RE: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) Mr. Renner, I left you a voicemail to follow up on the meeting you requested with Growth Management staff to discuss planning related questions associated with the referenced project that is under review. I'll assist with coordinating this meeting with the help of Thomas Clarke in the Zoning Division. For starters, please let us know who you anticipate to attend with their contact info, and if you'd prefer a zoom/virtual meeting or in -person meeting? Thanks, Laura Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239) 252-5587 laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov From: LauraDeJohnVEN Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 5:18 PM To:'dave.renner@premiersir.com' <dave.renner@premiersir.com> Cc:'annrenner.naples@gmail.com'<annrenner.naples@gmail.com>;'tkinnear@gmail.com' <tkinnear@gmail.com>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountvfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountvfl.gov>; MarcellaJeanne <Jeanne.Marcella@colliercountvfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colIiercountyfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Haven at North Naples (GMPA-PL20220001043 & PUDZ-PL20220001042) Mr. Renner, Trinity Scott advised that you're interested in meeting with Growth Management staff to discuss planning related questions associated with the referenced project that is under review. I will assist with coordinating this meeting with the help of Thomas Clarke in the Zoning Division. For starters, please let us know who you anticipate to attend with their contact info, and if you'd prefer a zoom/virtual meeting or in -person meeting? Thanks, Laura Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Packet Pg. 126 9.B.6 Desk: (239) 252-5587 laura.dejohn0colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 127 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petition of the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirements of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petition or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s). NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP, PRESIDENT/CEO WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERTY NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL-20220001042 & PL-20220001043. IGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore WaV STREET OR P.O. BOX Naples, FL 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The tore going instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 21st day of March 2023, by means of physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, w o ia4amwaal1y �nt me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Yi►v' .. 57`EPHANIE KAROL J ai ✓ �ii�i � °• Notary Public State of Florida Commission N GG 965d3� Signatu e of Notary Public My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 202� Bonded through National Notary Assn. y om Isslon TzTpife-!37 Printed Name of Notary Public (Stamp with serial number) Packet Pg. 128 a41 ZVOLOOOZZOZld - uol;!;ad BuluOZ : 96Z5Z) (£ZOZ-LZ-£);!^ep!JIV pue su6lg 6ulaeeH a!!gnd :;uawgoelly L t � C CD 0 � C Cli N o o Wct n. CD 0 0 '� N -0 c �� �_. �- O CD r � CDCD ` N of Q N � J U O CL CO 1 cCS CV Ucor Z °- Cl SC L N d QD Q CM v_ ul c Z C Q U o Ow Q� o J QD00 cn N QQ� N m = — CV cz o CDmv rn N T_ Cb a m �a a ti m ci a41 ZVOLOOOZZOZld - u011ROd BuluOZ: SUSZ) (£ZOZ-LZ-£);!nep!IIV pue SUBIS 6ulaeaH a!!gnd :;uawLj3ejjv �i UJ M d N5 O 0 � �Q O CON, O pO O N N J z O a �U H. ZCL E5 mayr CL m ii. - (n J W Z = TW Of i O Z J f ) Q W t � Q �w U w0 Q a 31 ra UM V y,� U Ol a W G O W a t- = o 1= m v U] N ~ c U `n N a��iE a°i C N 0 C3 M N X U CO r Y L N c a c m L O CU N {Z c E E O U o c N `ui :3 ° N O O U Ln U Q N O U c coz N 0 co v 9.B.8 X5 any a5a95 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on May 23, 2023, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tarn ami Trail East, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES BY ADDING THE AIRPORT CARLISLE MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT TO THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW GROUP CARE, CARE UNITS, NURSING HOMES, ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES, AND CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES USES WITH A MAXIMUM FOR AREA RATIO OF 0.65, AND UP TO OFF WHICH 76 WALL ELY UI E RENT RESTRICTED AS AFFOR ABLTTHE SBJECT PROPERDWELLING TY S LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE AND AIRPORT ROAD IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 27.78x ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.(PL202200gt043j AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REZONING THE CARLISLE NAPLES AND THE SOUTHERLY ADJACENT PARCEL TO ALLOW GROUP CARE, CARE UNITS, NURSING HOMES, ASSISTED LIMING FACILITIES, AND CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES USES WITH A MAXIMUM 0.65 FLOOR AREA RATIO AND UP TO 336 MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/li TO A MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO BE KNOWN AS THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD ON'27.78x ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE AND AIRPORT ROAD IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION 96-405, A CONDITIONAL USE ESTABLISHING THE GROUP CARE FACILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1PL2D2200D10421 Location Copies of the proposed Ordinances are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager Prior to presentation of the agenda Rem to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any Rem. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the hoard will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the Opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event(meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercourV govlour-county/visdors/calendar-of-everts after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the.pumic meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote particip0on is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the maeft, plem call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig6coliiercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Beard will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal' is based. If you are a person with a.disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trai) East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICK LOCASTRO, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Marito Vergars, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Packet Pg. 131 THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28D0 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl eov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Rezone to PUD (PUDZ) Date and Time: Tuesday 3/15/22 at 3:OOPM Companron GMPA- Airport ar is e Resr Su ist.PL Assigned Planner: Laura DeJohn Engineering Manager (for PP and —) I Project Information Project Name: The Grove (PODZ) PL#: 20220001042 238090007 & Property lD#: 238290001 Current Zoning: Agricultural Project Address: 6903AirportRd NCih,; Naples State: NJ Zip: 39109 Applicant: Paula McMichael, AICP, VP -Hole Montes, Inc. Agent Name: Paula McMichael, AICP, VP Phone: 231-211-2018 Agent/Firm Address: _950 Encore Way gty;Naples State: FL 2i 39110 Herring ET AL, Charles E John E Crimmel Trust 9Haron Property Owner:_Crimmel Trust Whit lev Ward-Parcel#00238090007 SRG CN FL LLC%Harbert Management Corp Parcel#00238290001 Please provide the following, if applicable: L Total Acreage: 27.76 H. Proposed # of Residential Units: 298 +/- iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number•. RES 1996-905 vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 1 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www colliercountvFl a v (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/i6/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally anew Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note -link is his:/hvrvv✓ cDlliercountvR Oov/Home/ShowDocumentv1d-75093 ZaNIN c. Md(<S — CoMO GANp+INL p 4QLrc (d7Y LrTl�a-S It Site is whhin the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities antl Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send i[ (by emalli to [he four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. -along wlth a request that they send usaletter pr mall of "no objection"to the petition. Bob Mitldleton RMitltlleton�naolesgov com Allyson Holland AMH II tl� e I Rabin Singer RS' (� I Edca Martin Disclaimer: Information providetl bystaflto applicant tludng the Pre -Application Meefing is based on the best available data at the time o/ the meeting and may not fully in/orm the applicant o/ issues that Could arise during the process. The Atlministretive Code and LOC dictates the regulations which ell applications must satis/y. Any checklists provided ofrequiretl data Ior an application may riot (ally outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility fo provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 Thom Fro Sent: To: C<: Subjer Attache Thomas, here are zoning notes for the pre-app for PL20220001042 -The Grove (PUDZ): • APPIi 27.7E • Eithe Court • Eithei • Apple Canis • PUDI prop< Consi how t • Exper • PUD Inforr Laura Dejohn, A/CP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239j 252-5587 Laura dejohnCcdcolliercounivn gov ----Original Appointment ---- From: Pre -Application Meetings <PreApplicationMeetii Sent: Thursday, February 24, 20223:Og PM To: Pre -Application Meetings; LauraDelohnVEN; KlopfP paulamcmichael@hmeng.com; ellensummers@hmeng bretb@me.com; bbasye@johnsondevelopment.net; Ar BeardLaurle; BeddowShar; BosiMichael; Brad Jackson; I ChachereKatherine; Cooklaime; CritchfieldHoward; Crc EstradaMaria; Faulkner5ue; FeyEric; FinnTimothy; Fore: GossellnLiz; GrantKimberley; GundlachNancy; HansenR JohnHouldsworthVEN; JohnsonErir, Kellylohn; KurtzGei MargaritaAcevedoVEN; MastrobertoThomas;MCKenna RESOLUTION-18- 40 RECITALS WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to increase the amount of affordable housing to its workers and residents, encourage the retention of affordable -workforce housing in the County, encourage the location of residences in proximiTy to employment centers, reduce commute times to places of employment, and provide businesses with access to a pool of employees within the County; and WHEREAS, the Board has formally expressed its commitment to affordable- housing by adoption of certain Goals, Objectives and Policies in the CounTy's Growth Management Plan (GMP); and WHEREAS, the intent of Goal I of the GMP's Housing Element is to create an adequate supply of safe, decent, sanitary, and affordable housing for all residents of Collier County; and WHEREAS, Objective 1 of the GMP's Housing Element states that the County will seek to "Provide new affordable housing units in order [o meet the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very -]ow, low, moderate and gap incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and -worker housing in Tura] Collier Co- and WHEREAS, in order to address the housing needs of low, moderate, and gap income persons by encouraging the more efficient production of affordable housing, GMP Policy 2.5 requires the County and the City of Naples to review its existing permit process system in an effort to reduce the processing time and cost [IBGRC-W fibl l l J926t9/1 � of affordable housin. WI IEREAS, Commissioners thro procedures for expel qualified projects to WHEREAS, expedited review pro serving families with the progam consiste County. NOW, THE] Commissioners of C 1. This R 2. The foregoing Recitals are adopted as We and incorporated as part of this Resolution. 3. The Board of County Commissioners' affordable housing expedited review policy, as amended, is adopted for immediate use, as follows: A. Purpose/Scope: The purpose of this Progam is to establish procedures to allow for expedited reviews of all development orders qualifying as affordable housing so as to create more affordable housing and comply with State law. The expedited review process for qualified development orders is no[ intended to otherwise modify or alter existing procedural standards for reviewing development orders, including those that do not qualify for affordable housing. B. App1a1': These procedures apply to the review of all qualified development orders for new and expanding development in Collier County proposing to construct affordable housing. In order to qualify for the expedited review process, the applicant fora proposed development ordermust: I. Specifically request affordable housing expedited review project I l scac-O W 61 / 13936]9111 status as part 1 163.3164 (7), those for I Development limited building, and 1 2. Construct an affordable housing project [hat contains a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the total number of approved units as approved affordable housing in the 140% or below of household medium income category;and 3. Include a certificate issued by the Collier County Community and Human Services Division stating that the affordable housing project has qualified for expedited review status by meeting the criteria as outlined in this Resolution. C. Affordable Ha using Expedited Review Procedures. Pt developn process, County demons,, that dem review p, 2. Affordable Pre- applicationmeeting. A pre -application meeting is required prior to a development order application being submitted under this expedited review process. 3 Submittal of affordable expedited review Development Order Application. Once qualified, an application for a development order, including an approved copy of the certificate of affordable housing for expedited review issued [ IB-0RC-00661l13936]9/1I �,i-s-. a.R• 4 by Collier County CommuniTy and Human Services, must be submitted to the County for expedited review within nine (9) months from date of issuance of the certificate. If not timely submitted, [he applicant must apply to be re -qualified as set forth above. 4. Affordable housing expedited review lime line for application sufficiency. Complete development order application submittal packages, once time - stamped by the Growth Management Department will receive an expedited sufficiency review as set forth below. a. The Growth Management Department, will review the submittal package and determine it to be "complete" oc "incomplete" after sufficiency review. b. To be considered "complete" an application submittal package for a Zoning, Engineering and/or Environmental Section type petition must inciude the following: all items checked off on pre -application meeting notes (i.e., application and review fees, addressing checklist, and any additional information requested and noted during the pre -application meeting, and any other information noted as a required). To be considered "complete" an application submittal package for the Building Permit Section must include all items checked off on the application checklist noted as required (i.e. survey, truss drawings, energy calculations, and any other information noted asrequired). c. An application package deemed "incomplete" will not be accepted and will be returned to the applicant noting the deficiencies and the applicant will be directed to reapply. With each subsequent submittal, the Growth Management Department will determine an application package to be "complete" or "incomplete" after sufficiency review d. Once an application package is deemed "complete" it will have all necessary data entered into the computer project -tracking program noting the project as an "affordable housing" and an expedited review route sheet will be completed, attached, and [he application package distributed for staffreview within three (3) business days from sufficiency review to determine submittal as "complete". I1 &GRC-00661/I192679/11 P,6ea.r+,s ,�. Expedited review times jot aJjardable projects. Review of any development order with an expedited review status will be completed and the appropriate staff reports and approvals completed within one hundred and twenty (120) business days for petition types such as Rezone and/or Conditional Use requests, sixty (60) business days for petition types such as Subdivision Plats and/or Site Development Plan requests, or seventy-five (75) days for residential Building Permit requests from date of distribution for staff review. b. To ensure that expedited review applications move through the review process in a timely manner, all re -submittal packages and plan corrections must be provided to the County by the applicant within fifteen (15) business days measured from the date of staffs review comment letter created at the end of each review cycle. As such, the County's complete 120/60/75 business day review timeframes will not include any time when the County is waiting for the applicant to re -submit plan corrections based on staffs review comment letter. c. In order to meet the complete expedited review period noted in paragraph 5. a and b. above, review staff must complete their reviews for affordable housing applications within fifteen (151 business days from the distribution date of submittal package for planning petitions (i.e. PUD Rezones or Conditional Use), seven (7) business days from the distribution date of submittal package for site -related petitionsSubdivision Plats or Site Development Plans), or twenty- . (25) business days from the distribution date of submittal package for Building Permits. d. Resubmittal packages, additional information and/or corrected plans will be reviewed order the same submittal procedures until all of the assigned review departments have approved the development order and final approval is granted by the County Manager or his designee. e. Once an application fora development order has been rejected twice by County staff, the applicants or agents must attend a mandatory project review meeting to be held with all County review departments yet to approve the application. The purpose of such a project review meeting will be to reach resolution and allow the [18-GRC-006fi1/13936]9/I� II application to proceed to public hearings. f. Once all departments have completed reviews for a development order such as but not limited to a site development plan or building permit resulting in an approved status the final approval process shall be completed within three (3) business days (i.e. final typing ot'pemtit or approval letter for site development plan). proj limi pmj the 1 gua, day ATTEST: DWIGk E. BROCK, CLERK BY !J C Attest as 10 ChaltfRBIID`puq�lerk signature only. Approved as to form and legality: Iennife?Belpedio �� \� � Assistant County Atto ey ICY' �� BOARD OF O Y CO NERS COLLIE O T By: A DREW SOLIS,CHAIRMAN IIB�(iRC�006611IJ926]9i1J I '��� ,2, /f _7 ThomasClarkeVEN From: KlopfParker Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 4:01 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App RESEARCH for The Grove (PUDZ) - PL20220001042 &Companion GMPA-Airport Cadisle Residential Subdistdct-PL20220001043 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Camp Planning Pre-app notes: Parker Klopf Collie Senio 2g00 Naple Direr Parke Visit r Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htto://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Under Florida Law, a -mail atldmsses are public records. If you do not want your a -mat address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this offce by telephone or in writing. Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis forthe purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, It Is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: htt s• /www colliercountvfl eov/home/shawdocument�id-69624 Zoning Certificate applications can he found here: hops//www colliercountvfl eov/vour-eovernment/divisions-f- LePerations-reeulatorv-manaeement/zonine-or-land-use-application/zonine other land use applications. From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfi.gov> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 3:20 PM t� t �73G¢ oZ.tz, Cow y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLEB, FLORIDA 34104 www colliercountvfl eo (239) 2a2-2400 Meeting Notes Ter r7 rnTt�ti—(1Ik�1a �� -Ss Eun� A 3 4 �ult Mn..— wt, -�.ni !�¢,vnS-S FruM��A7rnnbH i iM, 3B1-3R.? GNV12uv µewTM1L- `M�f+b �,�n — S pru qt+- r9-wD checK[es7t c�.�, Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff IO applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully rm the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The 'Any- nee— Code and LOC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 3 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 2:45 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: The Grove PUDZ pre app meeting notes Thomas, I will not be a meeting with Please check 1 methodology Please also ac Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by email required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed _ two-way PM peak hour net trips based an the use codes in [he ITE Monual on trip generotion rates in effect a[the timeofapplicationforSDP/SOPA orsubdivision platapprova 'so provide interconnection commitment using standard language: "Vehicular and Pedestrian interconnection will be provided to the to allow access to all connection points with consistent with the conceptual PUD Master Plan, . The final location of the access point will be coordinated with the adjacent property owner and across -access easement with maintenance responsibility will be provided at time of the first Site Development Plan or Plat. The connection and supporting infrastructure will be constructed to the property line by the developer or successors or assigns prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy including all connections to the existing development according to the cross access agreement. Also provide developer commitment to pay fair share of planned intersection improvements for Airport Pulling -Orange Blossom. Staff will provide language used for similar zoning requests once imparts are known with your TIS. Respectfully, Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail adtlress released in response to a public records request, tle not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this o%ce by telephone or in writing. ThomasClarkeVEN From: LauraDelohnVEN Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2 70: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: Beard Laurie Subject: FW: Pre -Application I (GMPA) Attachments: Transportation-PUD Thomars,/please add to the pre app notes for todaWs meeting. Thanks! From: Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 3:27 PM To: LauraDelohnVEN daura.Delohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20220003042 -The Grove (PUDZ) Companion PL20220001043 (GMPA) PUD Monitoring pre-app notes are attached. Laurie Bet Project Ms Please note PUD Monitor 28D0 N. Harr Naples, FL 3 La�rle.eeara Phone: (239) oou�ia Under Florida Law, a -mail atldresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail atldress released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to [his entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. P�- I.6 . � . Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre4pp Notes Transportation Planning "The maximum total daily hour net trips based on the time of application for SDI Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC, PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the out of the PUD, and this en close-out of the PUD. At Company Name Here. SI commitments to a successc needs to be approved for Managing Entity will be rel staff, and the successor em off tracts, the Managing acknowledgement of the c owner's agreement to cot Managing Entity shall not closed -out, then the Manal of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.0. any way create any rights c agency and does not create applicant fails to obtain rec agency or undertakes actin All other applicable state o development " Developer Commitments: trip gem use code '/SDPA t tse code; Managit [iTy shall the time Could th r entity, � legal sul eased of ity shall EntiTy ommitm tply wit be reliev ing Enti t2(5)F.5 n the pat any liabi uisite ap is that re federal ThomasClarkeV EN From: OrthRichai Sent: Wednesdx To: ThomasCl: Subject: RE: Zoninc Carlisle Re Thomas, Please include the following comment to the PUDZ. • Please submit a stormwa[er management plan that identifies all drainage easements on the property. • Identify the general flow path to [he Airport Pulling Canal. The current development uses a 12" RCP outfall pipe under Airport Pulling Road, other outfall options to cross Airport Pulling Road exist and should be identified in a general narrative stormwater management plan forthe proposed new development. Sincerely, Rick Orth Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drlve, S[e 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-262-6092, Cellular 239-276-3085 RichardOrth(aCollierGov Net From: ThomasClarkeVEN <7homas.Clarke@cDlliercountyFl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 6:44 PM To: TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.ggv> Cc: LauraDelohnVEN<Wura.Delohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zoning Pre-App NOTES for The Grove (PUDZ) - PL20220001042 &Companion GMPA-Airport Carlisle Residential Subdistrict-P L20220001043 Hi Guys, Any Pre-App notes for The Grove (PUDZ), pre-app was last Tuesday? Thanks, Tom operntons Wooly:e - zoning olvision 2800 North Norushce Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-262-2626 Tell us,7ho�w we are doing by taking our2gning Division Survey at htto://bit.ly/CollierZon'ng Escreding Expecfallom Everytloy Thol From Sent: To: Subjt Atta< Here nasClai at: hments: are my n 1. Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide FLUCFCS aerial map of the subject property please include the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland hahitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been mei. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 2. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear, and Florida Bonneted Ba[ as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to Inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conduRed in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 3. Provide amoun utility plan w submit :alcul and r d dra press tans d. 4. Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (COME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. 5. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. 6. Indicate how the project design minimizes Impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite). 7. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. 8. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed s[ormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements ofthe Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 9. The proposed project occurs in a Wellfield Protection Overlay Zone. Please provide an illustration to show the projects location in relation to the Wellfield Protection Overlay. Please address that the proposed uses will comply with LDC 3.06.00. Please Check off $2500 Environmental Data Fee. Craig Brown Senior Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How afe we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! coma mdat onHe rown eILCn :mom a.Cas rA.Ra IOrtf hkan empt rDelc iabo( Pre-/ Ict-PL \ftel re, I20( 1ui ill a 2oC e kr Clark Mari Idi <Hi acolli >tteau acolli� tro@c iney@ @toll acolli� 'ton@ hnVEl �COIRf Epp RE 20220 Hoot !iew logo tl ml so d o10 pow EVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyFl.gov> h 14, 2022 320 PM .idi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BeardLaurie <Laurie.Bean frcountyfl.gov>; Cooklaime Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gf @colliercountyFl.gov>; PerryDerek cDerek.Perry@colliercaf �rcountyFl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyf alliertountyFl.gov>; ImpactFees clmpactFees@colliercounty colliercountyFl.gov>; MoscaMichele <MicWe.Mosca@collie ercountyfl.gov>; HansenRachel <RacheLHansen@tolliercou rcountyfl.gav>; SawyerMichael <MichaeLSawyer@colliercc colliercountyFl.gov> I <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyFl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker. rcountyFl.gov> iEARCH for The Grove (PUDZ) - PL20220001042 & Compani 103043 All, the attached Zoning Pre-App Research ft L2. !eting(s) are tomorrow Tuesday. 3/16/22 iscuss the COmDanion GMPA-Airport Carl 13. f you have any questions. +a" 3.�.a. Environmental Data Checklist Project Name I 1--1 -11 The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LI 1. Provide the EIS fee if— or CU. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENV Environmrntal Data. Environmrntal Data Submittal Requ academic credentials and experience in the area of rnviror Academic credentials and experirnce shall be a bachelor's at least two years of ecological or biological professional revision dates on resubmitmis. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classificafion Systrn (S final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be veril (SFWMD) or Florida Deparhnrnt of Environmental Prc plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide a on the FLUCFCS map [he location of all high quality we 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within d wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by approval. Where functionality scores have not been vex reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with St 4. SDP or 1.1 plat construction plans with impacts to five of potential water quality impacts of the project by evalu (post development conditions considering the propose compazed with water quality loadings of the project arc analysis shall be performed using methodologies approves demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosph 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into p met. 6. Where native vegeta[Ion is retained on site, provide a top provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes id. plans, include this information on the site plans. 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and fc communities similaz to those existing on site. The survey recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conser Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced envirorunrntal consultant indicates that the 1Jrelihood of li FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey ti or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical Additional survey time may be required if listed species az 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and --in, plans in ai species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat rt FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the I species and their habitats. Identify tfie loc— of listed location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the I0 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where oft -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. I4. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. I5. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or I,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to I2 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. I6. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? 27. PUD master plan or P—DP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the — document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.0.6 O.I.E. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.0507. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Chech Project Name Pj.2uizoao/U 1. Ls the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.0: 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLC identfyin9 upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Cod FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify [he location of all preserves and label each as ": Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreal amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated o and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3: Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum wi, Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include a113 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.06.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 2S from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similaz activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berth azound wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the OMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf— provide soil sampling/groundwaterraonitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC ]0.02.I3.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 ] I. [fthe PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION —DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC —see I-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the re:r states "subjecr ro LDC section related to Allowable uses wirhla Courory required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Namre rails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC reuirements. 3. Stomrwater only when in accordance wiqth the LDC. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10A2.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of [he project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they aze provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GRONlTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Www.colliercountvfl.eov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 2U220001U42 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Ma le Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 evedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Trans ortation Plannin 252-2361 stechen.baluch@c011iercountyfl.gov MSM/Deputy fire Marshal - ❑ Shar A.Beddow Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@ nfire.or ❑ Ra Bellows Zoning, Plannin Mana er 252-2463 raymond.6ellows@calliercoun O Beard PUD Monitorin 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercoun .gov ,� /Laurie L9 Crai Brown Enviranmemal S ecialis[ 252-2548 crai .brown@colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Mana in Asst Coun Attorne 252-8773 heidi.ashtan@colliercoun I. ov ❑ Thomas Clarke Zonin O erations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyR.gov ❑ Lamle Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 laime.cook@colliercoun ov ❑ Gabriela Castro Zonin Princi al Planner 252-0211 abriela.castro@calliercoun . ov ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 demeo@northcollie�re.cam ❑ w iF �`~% UHIi Plannin 2523WZ eric.fey@calliercoun[ I. OV ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zonin Princi al Planner 252-4312 timoth .finn@colliercoun ❑ Sue Faulkner GMP-Com rehensive Plannin 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercoun ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael. ibbons@colliercount I. ov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. En ineerin Stormwater 252-2434 storm. ewirtz@colliercoun ov Development Review -Planning —/ Bf Cormac Giblin, AICP Mana er 252-5095 Cormac. iblin@colliercoun . ov ❑ Na Gundlach, AICP Zonin Princi al Planner 252-2484 undlach@colliercount .gov ❑ Rachel Hansen GMP—Com rehensive Plannin 252-1142 RacheLhansen@colliercoun I. ov ❑ Richard Hendedon Zoning Princi al Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlon @colliercoun I. ov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineerin Suhdivision 252-5757 'ohn.houldsworth@colliercoun I. Ov ❑ Alicia Humphries Ri ht-Of-Wa Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anita Jenkins Planning &Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita: enkins@colliercoun ov ❑ John Kell Zonin Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kell @colliercoun I. ov Cfk�Parker Klo f GMP—Com rehensive Plannin 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercoun . ov ❑ Tro Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.cam ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 Blintz@northcallierfire.com ❑ DianeL nch O erations Anal st 252-8243 diane.l nch@colliercoun I. ov ❑ Thomas Mas[roberta Greater Na Les Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercoun ❑ lack McKenna, P.E. En ineerin Services 252-2911 'ack.mckenna@colliercountyFl.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 14 of 5 Con�rw y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 vnvw.colliercountvR.gov (2391252-2400 ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director- IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercoun ov ❑ Michele Mos<a AICP Ca ital Pro ea Plannin 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercoun . ov ❑ ichard Orth Stormwater Plannin 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercoun Edc Ortman Zonin Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercoun .av Derek Pe Assistant Coun Attome 252-80fi6 Derek. er @colliermun ❑ Brandi Pollard Utill Impactfees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@mlliermunt ov ❑ Todd Rl all North Collier Fire 697-9227 td all@narthcollieTire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, Development Review P.E. Princi al Pro'ect Mana er 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliermun I. ov ❑ lames Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Plannin Mana er 252-2708 'ames.saho@colliercountyFl. ov C�' Michael Sawyer a° Trans ortatlon Plannin 252-2926 michael.sa er@mlliercoun ❑ Co Schmidt, AICP Cam rehensive Plannin 252-2944 mrby.schmidt@colliercountyFl. ovv ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Peter Shawlnsk Architectural Review 252-8623 tershawinsk @colliercountyFl.gov Mark Tem leton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.temple[on@colliercountyFl.gov ❑ Dannie Thomas Client Services Su ervimr 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliermun ❑ lessiw Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasca@colliercountyFl. ovov ❑ ion Walsh, P.E. Buildin Review 252-2962 onathan.walsh@colliercoun v ❑ Klrsten Wilkie Environmental Review Mana er Z62-6618 kirsten.wilkie@colliercoun I.gov ❑ Christine Willoughb Develo ment Review-Zonin 252-6748 chris[ine.willoughby@colliercoun CYDaniel Zunzune ui North Collier Fire 252-2310 DanIel.Zunzune ul@colliercoun .ovv Additional Attendee [nntart Information• Name Representing-7 Phone Email %L{111Li Qi, TO$4/ ���v y7 GONiii.p Sac A7mrhe0 Corl"4'eiTn.Fw Q uLht+.e l�vCe M°��o3 �n1 rC(Z(t fl/or/ ..uNd. C L LAw uh MOH kah,k.� Ld Updated 1/12/2021 Page I S of S ^ �Q� ����� Appl�mnr/Agen[moy also sendstte [V_l^l V plans or ronceprual plonsfor review In advance iJdesired. Grawth Management Department Zoning Division PL20220001042-TheGrove(PUDZ) Planner: Laura..I.hn STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app requert Paula McMichael, AICP, Vice President —Hale Mantes, Inc. 239-284-2018 • Agent to list for PLq Paula McMichael, AICP, Vice President —Hole Mantes, Inc. • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Herring, et al, Charles E., John Crimmel Trust, Sharon Crimmel Trust, Whitley Ward —Parcel ID: 00238040007 SRG CN FL, LLC—Portion of Parcel No. 00238240001 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) A PUD rezone [o allow multi -family residential development (298±units). The subject properties (Folio Nos: 00238040007 and a portion of 00238240001, totaling approx. l5 acres) are located on the west side of Airport Road North, south of Orange Blossom Drive, zoned A -Agriculture. Companion item to Airport{arlisle Residential Suhdistrict. • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that aPP1Y)� Please see above. • Details about Project: Please see above. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Paula McMichael, AICP Title: Vice President Email: Paulamcmichael@hmeng.com Phone: 239-2542018 Cancellation/Reschedule Requerts: Contact Connie Thomas{Ilent Services Supervisor Consuela.ThomasCalcolliercountvfl.cov Phone: 239-252-2473 Creetetl Aprll 5, 301] Loo[lon: G:\GOES Dlanning Services\Cument\Zoning Staff Information W Zang Denson• 2W0 Nah Hasarpe Ddie• Naples. Florida 3g109.239-252-2N0•wwx.cdfagw.ne! Conn y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 39109 www.colliercountv.eov (239) 252-2900 FA%: 1239) 252-6358 Fi I Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code n PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Daument is available online at htt : /www.colliercountvFl.eov/Home/ShawDocumen[�id=76983. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED COPIES REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of amendment Is necessary 1 J�� Elwhy Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 Pro a Ownershi Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressine Checklist 1 Warranty Deeds) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 El Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Curren[ Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included 1 ❑ on aerial. Statement of Utility Provisions 1 �. Lj Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC seRion 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with ❑ ❑ project planner at time of public hearings. Usted or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include 1 ® ❑ copies of previous surveys. Traffic Impact Study CQ(�,ecT+G�Tim: aF 1'40S gu,R'.'- 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all re wired documents 1 Completed ExhihitsA-F(see below for additional information)' ❑ -f;; ❑ Ust of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Col -, County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountv.eov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239( 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 814" x 11" copy ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Maser Plan 24"x36"—Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru &underlined 1 El Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requlremeM 'The fallowing exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.ji.c.,thg applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation &Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROl7TED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School Dia[riR (Residential Componentsl:Amy ❑ Conservancy of SWF❑Nichole Johnson Lockheart Utilities En ineerin : Eriefe 7'W.,n,�Fe� 2Ewc Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams Director Emer envy Mana ement: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Ci o(Naples: Robin Singer, Plannin Director Other: Ci of Na les Utilities Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00' plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: an $8,000.00` plus $2-5 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $1,011.11. plus $25.00 acre or fraction of an acre ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: �nlcrhoA+2eot 7y eM.F�� i'o STi+FF o Methodology Review: $500.00 'Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 Mazcb 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Con.�Y..C`o_u�n y COLLIER COUNTY G GROWTH MANAGE www.colliermunty Legal Aj�l o/d B ❑ Schoolc o M1 0 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time ojapplica[ion submission and those fees are set forth by [he Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notifi[atlon mailers forApplirn[ions headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior [o hearing. All checks payable ta: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant forthis petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this suhmittal package. understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. 'Additional fee for the 5"' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Dace Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 (PL-20220001042) CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED REVIEW CER7 The G Name of Development: Airpoi ApplicanUAgent: RODert Mulh 239A3i3535, ryovanou Email: Size of Property: 2].1a acres Proposed Ilse: ALF/CCRC 8 Mun'rfamiry residential Total Number of Residential Units Planned: 33a Number of Affordable Housing Unify Planned: 76 # Ranfal #Owner Area Median Income (AMI(Target 120%-140% GAP Income 38 80%-120% Moderate Income 38 50% -a0% Low Income 30% -50% Very -Low Income 0%- 30% Ertremely-Low Income CuneM % of Affordable Units: 22.9 Threshold to qualify: 20Y. Permit Number, 'rf available: Proposed Land Use Restriction: X 1 hereby certify that the abovedescdbed project meals the definigon of provitling afforable housing in Collier County and as such is enOtled 10 participate in the Counry's "Expedited Review Procetlures of Affordable Housing" as described in Resolution No. 2076-00. LaRowJacob pave°,oz�o,�zs sy: one: Community &Human Seryices Division Bu' deN lhvner/ Developerl Contractor This Cenifica0on must ba submitted to the Growth Management Depanment with your permit application package, or plan revisions, within nine months of date of issuance Cammuuty 8 Human Services Divldan • 3339 Tamiemi Trail East, SdN 211 • Napks, Florida 347125381 P39-252LARE [2273) • 23&252CRFE (2233j• 239.252-4230 (RSVP) • avra.cdtiergov.neMuneneervices (PL-20220001042) PUM APPLICATION co 'er county wd 40�A+ A, uuaat+L nuenwi+"'^"�ywsrs� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 2S2-63S8 ;Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PLID Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F,, Ch, 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch, 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10,02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Todd Ward & SRG CN FL, LLC &Charles Herring, John Crimmel Trt, Sharon Crimmel Trt ,Whitley Ward, Name of Property Owner(s): Sharon Wright Name of Applicant if different than owner: Johnson Development Associates, Inc. Address: 100 Dunbar Street city: Spartanburg State: SC ZIP: 29306 Telephone: 239-675-1750 E-Mail Address: bretjb@me.com Cell: N/A Name of Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO* Firm: Hole Montes, Inc. Address: 950 Encore Way 239 254 2000 City: N/ Telephone: - - _ Cell: E-Mail Address: bobmulhere@hmeng.com Naples Fax: N/A State: FL ZIP: 34110 Fax: 239-254-2099 Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. *Name of Agent: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Firm: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34103 Phone/Fax:239-435-3535,239-435-1218 Email:ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 Cott r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HOR5ESHOE DRIVE NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: AG w/CU (Res. 96-405) Group Care Facility Zoning district(s) to the PUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Partially developed with senior living community Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Multi -family residential Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No.: N/A PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 02 lass 25E Lot: N/A Block: N/A Subdivision: N/A Metes & Bounds Description: See Boundary Survey Plat Book: N/A Page #: N/A Property I.D. Number: 00238240001 & 00238040007 Size of Property: __ ft. x _ ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 27.78± Address/ General Location of Subject Property: SW quadrant of the intersection of Airport Rd. and Orange Blossom Dr. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 cof Kle�'T bounty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Agricultural with CU Orange Blossom Dr, Collier County Library -Headquarters S PUD (Bear Creek); Multi -family residential Multi -family Residential E A —Ag, CPUD (Italian Americ Club), RPUD (Naples Vlew), PUD (Lone Oak)' Italian Americ Club, Vacant, Airport Rd„ SF Residential, Office Uses, Retail Nursery W RSF-1, RPUD (The Carlisle), PUD (Sunshine Village) S-F residential, stormwater management lake * PUD (Longview Center) If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: _J_J Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS, Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www,colIiergov.net/]ndex.aspx?page=774, Name of Homeowner Association: Airport Pulling Windward Isle Homeowners' Assoc., Inc. Mailing Address: c/o Precedent Hosp & Property Managment City: Clearwater State: FL ZIP: 33762 3001 Executive Drive, Suite 260 Name of Homeowner Association: Walden Oaks of Naples Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: c/o Ability Management* City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 * 6736 Lone Oak Blvd. Name of Homeowner Association: II Regalo Homeowners' Association, Inc, Mailing Address: c/o Moore Property Management** City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 ** 5603 Naples Blvd. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercou nty.gov CoAer County EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria, On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. see Evaluation Criteria a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 Y' lYr�t`_- co"��'ler C011{'lty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes ❑ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING, OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 c-A' County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HOR6E3HOE DRIVE GROWiH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLE6, FLORIOA 34104 www.calliermunN.Eov (239) 262-2400 FAx: (239) 252-6368 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REgUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Johnson Development Associates, Inc. address: 100 Dunbar Street city Spart�nbu g state: SC ZIP: 29306 Telephone: 239-675-1750 Cell: N/A Fax: N/A E-Mail address: bretjb@me.com Address of Subject Property (If available): Airport Road North city: Naples state: FL Zip: 3410902 'PROPERTY INFORMATION' section/Township/Range: 049S /25E Lot: N/A Block: N/A subdivision: N/A Metes & BoDnds Description: See Boundary Survey Plat Book: _Page #: _Property I.D. Number: 00238240001 & 00238040007 TYPEOF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TOBE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utilitysystem .❑ b. City Utility system ❑ a Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: N. County water Reclametlon FadlRy d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. septic System ❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVILE TO BE pROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System x❑ b. City Utility system ❑ c. Franchised Utility system ❑ Provide Name: N. County Water Treatment System d. Private system (Well) ❑ Total Population to 6e Served: 336 multi -family residential units; 350 bed ALF providing 3 meals per day Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: zzs,tsz GPD Average Daily: 773,977 GPD B. $ewer -Peak: 323 GPM Average Daily: t24,265 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service Is expected to be required: ALF Is ewsnn9 end ronnecmd to wat�r.yalem. vnntar zoz3 ror mmo-famly realdac6ai. March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 C0 I1By C014"ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colhercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 2S2-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacityto serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Co�l�er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coillercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX; (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as The Carlisle Naples 6903 Airport Rd. N., Naples, FL 34109 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in EXhiibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for mixed -use planned unit development ( MPUD PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Mulhf6-Ya-novmh,andDavie. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives.of the property and as such, these Individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property In the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but Is not limited, to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtaln zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used In conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold In whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to and recorded by Collier County, 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the. Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent ownersthat all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant Is 1n force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any partof the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms; coA ion and safeguards of the planned unit development. er Owner SRG oN FL. LLC, Tr t Johns , Aulhorized Person Printed Name Printed,Name STATE OF ='R`$ COUNTY OF-r— 00AICS The foregoing instrumept was acknowleged before me by means of 16hysical presence oranline notarization this ath day of September O 20 22 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) SRG CN FL, LLC, Trent Johnson, Authorized Person Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license ®Has produced as Identification. =44ARIEMCMULLENULLENalic*XASNotarySlgnature.. _...._. i 5i1March 4, 2020 6, 202 e 8 of 11 Cod y county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Parcel 0 00238040M7, Sac 2 Twp 49 R 25, Colter County, Florida 3009. Approximately 9.98 acres -vacant. (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto, The property described herein Is the subject of en application for PU0 planned unit development (PUD PUD) zoning. We hereby designateJohnsonoe„etoparantA� legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these Individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuftof development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan Including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant In connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative Identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even If the property Is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be Incorporated Into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent ownersthat all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with thoseterms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant Is In force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all arms, conditions' hd safeguards of the planned unit development. 0 ?r Owner ar b 'firer. '!V r Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foreg ing instrument was acknowieged before me by means of ' physical presence or®online notarization this t�n` day of S 7 20Z, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) I) Erie n E Ive 1/1Q S .ch per5on(s) Notary Pubf e ust check applicable box: Are personally known,t me �DEBRAK BLACKWELL r]Has produced a curren drivers tic YJse =Ai ' f., []Has prod_ uced / s identiFlcptfon: ,r a MYCOMMISSI0H#HHi5Ui36 it;0taEIKP1REEJ3: August Bo0ded11wNoWryi?tbtloU2rdarwrt(ars Notary Signature: March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 T-1, e County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www, colliercounty,gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (739) 252-2400 FAXI (239) 2S2 6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Pemel 900238040007, sect TIP 49 R 25, Collier Ceunly rlodde 34109 App-ft.tes 9.98 acres-vacsnl --" (Street address and City, state and Zip Code) and legally described In ExhlbitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an applltation for PUD PUD planned unit development ( PUD) zoning_ We hereby designate John1-D—I.P—iAssoc. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individdals are authorized to legally bind 2I1 owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist In the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remaln the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be g6ided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project; 1. The property will be developed and used In conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed'to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein Is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even ifthe property Is subsequently sold in whole or In part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to and recorded by Collier County, 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to Comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for inthe planned unit development process will constitute a violation ofthe Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated Into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide noilce to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is In force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equltable relief as necessary to compel compliance, The County will not Issue permits, certlficates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing constructjPrInte y until the project is brou into comp' with all teems, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit ent. Owner Printed Name me Cv� STATE OF-F- p{LD}-- QY- a coo v COUNTY OF roW i;-R--_ L,\ r C )Lclvv c S �r'�p The foregoing Instrum nt was aeknowleged hefore me by means ofhysical presence orda off`Z y (pq) [online notarizatlon this 4 s2Tt��20 �? b rimed name o1 owner or ua' � � G Such persons) N t ry Public most check applicable box: 9Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license GILOL 'L1 tj j. r, � ( �� ( � I i { � 2� OFFICIAL STAMP Has produced as Identification. COLETfE M YOUNG NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Signature _J- 1 � COMMISSION NO. 989042 March 4, 2020 IdY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY2, M Page 8 of 1i. clkw minty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT vaurw.collleroounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 2524400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonlyknownas Pamal#002,18040897, Sao 2Twp 49 R25. Golllar County, Florida Soo8. Appro rrmjaly 9.98 ache -vacant (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described In EXbibitA attached hereto. The property described herein Is the subject of an application for Puo planned unit development (Puo PUD) zoning. We hereby designate?ora ,c6alnprieia"6 legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives ofthe property and as such, these Individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners ofthe property In the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority Includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agentsto assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will he guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: L The property will be developed and used In conformity with theapproved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made atthe time of approval of the master plan, even If the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requlrements, conditions, or safeguards provided for In the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code, 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated Into :covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant Is In force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project Is brought Into compliance with all terms, co Itlons and safeguar s of the planned unit development. � Owner Printed Name as Attorney -in -Fact for Printed Name Sharon Crimmel STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fore Ing instrumenb v acknowle ed before me b means of g 9 g y ysi presence or(�onilne not'tization this day of + a .r&.7,Fbyjprintednameofownerorqualifier) t »Uj�rn ,r(nhn. /r, r,°tniti Su persons) Not'a . Pu he must check applicab box: . `. a..ea..r.: ae.....' ✓QA a persolially kn /tO me 0E8RAK BLACKWEIl (Has produced arrt drivers licen a }� J ,, :� MY Cf1ti1Ai15810N # NH 156138 ❑Has produced t as tffjc i3n. F 1. g,qupu ,20 Notary5ignat . March 4, 20 Page 8 of 11 LIMITED DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BY THIS LIMITED DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, I, SHARON T. CRIMMEL, individually and as trustee of the Sharon E. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, resident of Naples, Collier County, Florida, appoint my son, JOHN E. CRIMMEL, JR., as my attorney -in -fact for the limited purposes contained herein. This durable power of attorney shall not be affected by any physical or mental disability that I may suffer except as provided by statute, and shall be exercisable from this date. All acts done by my attorney -in -fact pursuant to ttris power shall bind me, my heirs, devisees and personal representatives. This power of attorney is nondelegable. I grant unto my attorney -in -fact full power and authority to negotiate the sale and conveyance of the following described property on such terms and conditions as my attorney -in -fact may deem proper: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25, East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of said Section 2, North 2'14'00" West 1049.41 feet; thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89°51'42" West 100.07 feet to the West right of way line of State Road 31 and the Place o f Beginning of the parcel herein described: thence continuing parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89°51'42" West 1250.68 feet to the West line of the East 112 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2; thence along said West line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North 1 °57'50" West 347.75'; thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North 89051'42" East 1249.04 feet to the West right of way line of State Road 31; thence along said West right of way line, South 2014'00" East 347.75 feel to the Place of Beginning, being apart of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. I hereby revoke any and all limited powers of attorney previously made by me, authorizing any person to do any act relative to the above described property. At] rights, powers, and authority of said attorney -in -fact to exercise any and all of the rights and powers herein granted shall conurience and be in full force and effect thereafter until the earlier of (i) one year from the date of executing this power of attorney; or (ii) the filing of a revocation of this power of attorney in the Public Records of Collies County, Florida, 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Limited Durable Power of Attorney at Naples, Florida, this 21-4 day of September, 2020. Signed and delivered as to both in our presence: SHARON T. CRIMiv1EL Type or l7ri t name of Witness No. l Type or print name of Witness No. 2 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acicnowled9cd before nie this day of September, 2020, by SHARON T. CRIMMEL, individually and as trustee of the Sharon E. Crimtnel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, by means of E?p—fiysical presence or ❑ online notarization, who Q-is personally luiown to me or ❑ has produced a driver's license as identification, and who did take an oath. NOTARY PUBLIC: Sign /� Print 0-4- r,�NATALI EOUENAS State of Florida at Large NotaryPublicPubllc- Stateo(Fiorlda ConlmisSion 9 GG 185828 My Commission Expires: Minh I e , 2a 22 My Comm. Explres Mai 16. 2M Bonded through National Notary Assn, cow county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonlyknown as Parcel it 00238040007, Sea 2 Twp 49 R25, Colder County, nodda 34109. Ap m*wteiy9,93acres-vauW. (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described In ExhlbitA attached hereto. The property described herein Is the subject of an application for Puo planned unit development (Puo PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Johnson oevelopmantAsaac: legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these Individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop, This authority Includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly In the pursuit of development ofthe project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant In connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2, The legal representative Identified herein Is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval ofthe master plan, even ifthe property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County, 3, A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for In the planned unit development process will constitute a violation ofthe Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be Incorporated Into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant Is In force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance, The County will not Issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part ofthe planned unit developmentand the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project Is brought Into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner 14-t4 c Printed Name Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER ^^}} ,t The forego,) g Instrument .was a cknowleged'before me by means of ysical presence oUonllne notar(zatlon this v— day of . Jam' 2023�by (printed name of owner or qualifier( W h , I- le.. r Suc persons) Not v Publicmust check applicable box: ClArewsonally.known't6 me Has produced a current drivers i a6h. Has produced f as Identification. ff J D 1 LEO J. SALVATOiiI I Notary Signature; { t MyCOMMISSION 0HH050632 } March 4,2020 'ti+r. �; EXPIRES: November2ll,202G N .Fn OondedThruWaNPQNF604-- 't��er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliemcu rity.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as P"calk00238040007, See 2Twp49R25,Collier County, Flodda34108, AppmAmetely 9,98 acres -vacant, (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described In ExhlbltA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Puo planned unit development Puo PUD) zoning. We hereby designateJohhsorioavelgpmsniApsoc, , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these Individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property In the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority Includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist In the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly In the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used In conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein Is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even If the property Is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be Incorporated Into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners thatall development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant Is In force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance, The County will not Issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all ter c n itions a dafeg.' rds of the planned unit development, Owner Owner n GY Printed Name �Epd- * Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing ari rument was acknowleged before me by means of physical esence prElprillne notarization this _ day of — 20 Zy (printed name of owner or qualifier) I pJL1 f1% r�l aS ch person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: jAre personally known to me Ras produced a current drivers license as produced as Identification, .� D. RAK WCKWE11 Notary Signature: COMMiSSiON#HH150136 8 March 4, 2020 s+t o 1gT�68lid9dTiYu ,)itguilt28;2026 1 F .. �' t Ce -'6, coanq COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.cnlilercounry.gnv 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly i(nown as _Parcel # 00238040007, Ssc2Twp 40 R25, Golder County, Flodde 34109, �pprox4ntdnly 0.08 (street address and CRY, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibltA attached hereto, The property described herein is the subject of an application for Pun _ , planned unit development (Puo pUD) zoning, We hereby designate'i't1n onUnvolnpmonlnna'H' , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these Individuals are authorixed to legally bind all owners of the property In the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop, This authority includes, but Is not limited to, the hiring and authorizntlon of agents to assist In the preparation of applicatlons, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site, These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property wlll be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning, 1 The legal representative identified herein Is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made atthe time of approval of the master plan, even if the property Is subsequently sold In whole or In part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to and recorded by Collier County, B. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for In the planned unit development process will constitute a violation ofthe Land Development Code, 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be Incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide noteeto subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with thoseterms and conditions, 5. So long as this covenant Is In force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project Is brought Into compliance with %all terms, conditions and //safeguards of the planned unit development - Owner Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The lomi,con ; instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ('�plryslc tl presence nt ntllne notarizatlon this day of ull1kU.NVT 20 2�, by (printed name of owner or gnalificrl_� ''uyli pri'.un(;) Plni�r�r l'uldit nwst check applicable box: — [[An Lu raucdly knn,vit rn ot„ CHas produced a current drivers license _ ]Has produced as Identification, tar y ,: r Notary Signature;t ;;; ; "' �' Julie M. Wolfe �. 1, lj. ;l 1 �- �, hh(A Pilldkl l Slato r'l Qiin March 4, 2020 ;9v.e F''.Plrf)GA(A11_( 1.+ Page 8 of 11 PARCEL NO, 00238040007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 2°14'00" WEST 1049.41', THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, SOUTH 89°51'42" WEST 100.07' TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 31 AND THE PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, SOUTH 89°51'42" WEST 1250.68' TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 1°57'50" WEST 347.75'; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 89°51'42" EAST 1249.04, TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROUTE 31; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 2°14'00" EAST 347.75' TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; BEING A PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1.4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL NO. 00238240001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 02 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 1397.16 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 100.02 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD (C.R. 31) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 602.51 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 646.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 972.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 584.37 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, 660.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 660.26 FEET TO THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, 311.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Cor County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch.`3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to Pl)D- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone_ Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http:llwww.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES OF REQUIRED REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3,08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings, ❑ ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ x❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 ir' t Co rer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 2S2-2400 FAX: (239) 252-63S8 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %Z" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if the PUD El El El Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ x❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 1 ❑ x❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: [3 Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ® Exhibit B: Development Standards N Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1, of the Administrative Code El Exhibit D: Legal Description N Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each M Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDCsubsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey FO-1 Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Z Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 Z PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre 2� Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 N Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ® Transportation Review Fees: N Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 g Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 COLLIER COUNtt GOVERNMEM 280p NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34304 ww.colliercountv.gov (239) 252-2400 FA%: (239) 282-6388 Legal Advertis a CCPC:. ❑ School Concul o Mitiga coordi Fire Lode Plons those � es are s Neighborhood to hearing. All I As the authoriz checklist is inc submittal Infon Ing Fel i1,128 i00.00 Tency :ion Fe ration gevr e[)ortl Uotificc hecksl adages laded I nation "Additionaljeef the 5dsubsequentre-submittal willbe accessed at20%afthe originaljee. S�gnalure of Petitioner or Agent pate Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, PresidenUCEO Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) AFFIDAVITS OF AUTHORIZATION AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) r�- applicable)of �oHesoe oenor under oath, that I am the (chr 1. I have full author the referenced { application and tl 2. All answers to th attached hereto; 3. I have authorae� for the purpose r 4. The property w restrictions impo b. We/I au[hor¢e a in any matters re `Notes • Il the applicant is a torpor • if ttre applicant is a Llmife� typicalty be signed by the • ll the applicant is a partner • lI the applicant is a limiter partner" of fhe nametl parts • I/the applicant u a trust, tl • In each instance, first deh use Ne appmpdafe /ormat Untler penalties of perjury, 1 tleclare that 1 Aave read the foregoln® ATfitlavR of Authorization and that the facts�n i�rue. � SlyynaWre Date JOHNSON DEVELOPMENI'ASSOCIATES, INC. STATE OF FkBRIBA�' •�"`� COUNTY OF �� The foregoing instnrmenl was acknowk!ged before me by means m physical presence or ❑online notanration tliis tley of na 20,=, Dy (pnnletl name of owner or quellfier) rm.a Such persons) Notary Publk must check applipble box ❑R Are personally known to me p.� ❑ Has producetl a cunem tldvers license �.1"aao'(URI�v'r//�b� ❑ Has Protlucetl de 0 =pSif 1�`0.0.' ,j�T(� 4 Notary SlgiyTure: � J J = ICOMMIS$fONi c` i EXPIRES / N0�04f0(Y1032 f�Pr inn CAR��sF CP00{OA-001r51r55 REV N<n030 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) I, mm�•n..•• (print name), as mm�m r•� (title, if applicahle)of saocn a.uc (company, Ifa licable), swearor affirm under oath, That I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant0contmct pumhaser�and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and Me Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplemenhary matter attached hereto and matle a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours far the purpose of investigating and evaluating Me request made through this application; and [hat 4. The property will be transferred, wnveyed, soltl or subdividetl subject to [he conditions and restrictions imposed by the approvetl action. 5. Well authorize we•n Rw�•a, mrn•mvo..�•wm..w noe tc act as ourlmy representative in any matters regaNing this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • 1/the applicant u a corporation, then it is usually executetl by the carp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limded Liability Company (L.L. C.) or Limited Company (L. C.J, Men the documents should typically be signetl by the Company's'Managing Member." • ll the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behal/ of the partnership. • H the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identi/ietl as the "geneal partner' of the named partnership. • 1/the applicant is a trust, Men they must include the trustee's name and the words 'as trustee". • In each instance, grsf determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, crorporete, trust, partnership, and then use the appmpriafe /ormaf for that ownership. Under penakies of pet the facts stated in It ai STATE OF EIARIBA � COUNTY OF GBLi1ER Th foregoin InsirumenL �aay a �e�yyoL Such persons) Notary Pu Q[ Are personally known I ❑ Has produced a curter ❑ Has produced Notary Signature: CPWa-COA-Oe I1SIS5 REl'3/il2a3a 9/9/22, 3:18 PM Detail by Entity Name DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Sj �Jt t fiit11 rif q.+L" - ,,„r�°' ",�»-m�,L:�'• <..T,, ,..a �tr It . Irt<< 'JI'� =-1pi s./.. � �.:.:f: Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by_Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Foreign Limited Liability Company SRG CN FL, LLC Filing Information Document Number M21000010223 FEI/EIN Number 87-2057908 Date Filed 08/06/2021 State DE Status ACTIVE Principal Address 2100 THIRD AVE. NORTH, STE. 600 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203 Mailing Address 2100 THIRD AVE. NORTH, STE. 600 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203 Registered Agent Name & Address CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 1201 HAYS STREET TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-2525 Authorized Person(q) Detail Name & Address Title AP JOHNSON,TRENT 200 CRESENT CT., STE. 440 DALLAS, TX 75201 Title AP LANDRUM, BRIAN 200 CRESENT CT., STE. 440 DALLAS, TX 75201 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2022 03/16/2022 Document Images 03/16/2022 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08/06/2021 -- Foreign Limited View image in PDF format https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResu]tDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=lnitial&searchNameOrder=SRGCNFL:.. 1 /2 FOR PETITION NUMBERS(&) I, appllcable) o _ under oath, that 1. I ha the aPF 2. All etta 3. I hE for A. ThE reel 5. We In a 'Notes: • If the applicer • If the epplical typlcelty be sn • If the applicer • If the applica partneP of the • I/the appl�ar • In each instal use the apprc AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION PL-20220001042 & PL-20220001043 Untler penalties of perjury, I declare that I have reatl the foregoing Affitlavl[ of Authorization and that the f�a'c/�t'�s sta/t)etl1ln It are tr e. gnature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing I Wlnent was acknowleged before ma by means of [physical pYeaence or ❑online notarizegon this Rr A day of 1y/_�.�ua r y , 20�Z, by (pdnled name of owner or qualifier) rhnr I e f i G n-i n r ,,S_uc/h ger9on(s)Notary�Pub�lic moat chetic appllcable box: fL Nro personally known to j ❑ Has protluced a tune ere license °'Nh„ OEBRA R. BIACRWELL Hes d � r� ' fM00tlM139�ONNHH 1W178 ❑ pro ucetl We catlo� �1. PJlPIREb:Augual JB, JOJ6 Notary SlgnaWra "'BoMedllxuN Pu011a W4armWn CPaa-COA-Oa11511N5 RCV J/42020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMB -- S(S) PL2b220001042 & PL-20220001043 tiwt•w,� 41e)of � r ( An a)„as'� f ✓"�� (title under oath, chat I am the (choose one) owner a on omparly, If applicable), swear or affirm {�plfcant contract purohaserFland that: t. I have full authority to secure the approvl(s) requested and to timpose covenants and restrictions on he referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this applic tlon and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3, 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evafuating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions restrictions Imposed by the anoroved action and 5. Well authorizey7ohnson Development Associates, Inc. in any matters regarding this petition including throughFl2 aabove, to act as our/my representative *Notes: e If the applicant Is a corporation, then if is usually exelcuted by the corp. pros. or v, pros, e if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L b.) or Limited Company (L.C,), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member, " a If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and he Identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership, irthe applicant is a trust then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee In each instance, first determiira the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use tine appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, i declare that I e read the fac stated in it are tr Signature STATE OF FLA COUNTY OF GOL-L Eft. �c C1ri�.t(_rt�:Gt 5 the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that D to foregoing Instrument was aoknowleged before me by me ns of physical presen e or �{oM(ne, notarir_atio this day of c? 1 v u(s� 2p �,�by (printed name of oyvner or q alirier) G Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 0 Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license Q LoL 'Li q i q � 1+ �( Has produced as Identification, Notary Signature:�� CPW-COA.00I I 511 55 REV 3/4/2020 , COL.ETTME M Y4t1M NOTARY PUSLiC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. SSgp42 tviY CCMNIISSION EXP►RES DULY 2 2P23 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) I, rgnl a,n Jnhp E Crr,mrnol. it i applic 61e�cf- 5ha under oath, that I am the (choose one) owne 1. I have full authority to secure th the referenced property as a n application antl the Land Develc 2. All answers tc the questions In 1 attached hereto antl matle a par 3. I have authorized the staff of C for Ne purpose of Investigating I 4. The property will be transferr restrictlons Imposed by the appr 5. Well authorae Johnson nave in any matters regarding mis pal `Notes • I/the applicant is a corporatbn, then it is u • I/ the applicant is a Limited Liability Coml typically be signed 6y the Company's "Mai • //the applicant /s a partnership, then typlci • I/ the applicant is a limited partnership, t partner' of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must In • In each Instance, first determine the appl use the appropriate /ormat /orfhaf owners Under penalties of perJury, I declare that I have reatl the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that /the/,,T�/cts st/a/t/e/d/in i/tare true. / //!�•/bIA. L' `jj��j n-Fact Z• •�° LfJ Z2_ l� Slgna ure Lor Sharon Crimmel Dat STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing m t was acknowleged before me by means of physi�alyresenoe or f'lonlihe nclanzelion Ihle �dey of ,20?=by (printetl name o}owner orquell(ler) ('illl�a,nl7nhn� it✓irruM�.ii✓� ,S�u/ch persons) Notary Pub cmdsl check applicable box: `LJ' Are personally know to me Has protluced a rrenl tlnvers Ilea ❑ Has predueed � Iden ' -'' Notary Slgnat L( ^^�J MYCOMMISSION/NN tOply9 - ':;t ,V^� adxaa n,In kS' �1 W ua126, 1026 1'plpl CFOB-CM-OaIISnSS - �YaWoUMerM1dNO tl RRV ]142g2a 499 LIMITED DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BY THIS LIMITED DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, 1, SHARON T. CRIMMEL, individually and as trustee of the Sharon E; Crimniel Declaration of Trust dated October 2 1987 resident of Naples, Collier County, Florida, appoint my son, JOHN E. CRIMMEL, JR,,�as my attorney -in -fact for the limited purposes contained herein, This durable power of attorney shall not be affected by any physical or mental disability that I may suffer except as provided by statute, and shall be exercisable fi•om this date. All acts done by my attorney -in -fact pursuant to this power shall bind me, my heirs, devisees and personal representatives. This power of attorney is nondelegable. 1 grant unto my attorney -in -fact full power and authority to negotiate the sale and conveyance of the following described property on such terms and conditions as my attorney -in -fact may deem proper: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25, East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of said Section 2 North 2'14'00" West 1049.41 feet; thence parallel with the North line of the South I/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89°51'42" West 100.07 feet to the West right of way line of State Road 31 and the Place of Beginning of the parcel herein described: thence continuing parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89°5I'42" West 1250,68 feet to the West line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2; thence along said West line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North 1 °57'50" West 347.75 , thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North 89°5 P42" East 1249.04 feet to the West right of way line of State Road 31; thence along said West right of way line, South 2°14'00" East 347.75 feet to the Place of Beginning; being a part of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. I hereby revolve any and all limited powers of attorney previously made by me, authorizing any person to do any act relative to the above described property, All rights, powers, and authority of said attorney -in -fact to exercise any and all of tile rights and powers herein granted shall coinrnence and be in full force and effect thereafter until the earlier of (i) one year from the date of executing this power of attorney', or (ii) the filing of a revocation of this power of attorney in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Limited Durable Power of Attorney at Naples, Florida, this 3,-4 day of September, 2020. Signed and delivered as to both in our presence: AlLower. CR1MM1 L N c'-*6_[t e O u-e —c- s Type or pri t name of Witness No. 1 C,� Ut2r �r Gp as)MAfj Type or print name of Witness No. 2 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acluiowledged before me this4 day of September, 2020, by 81 ARON T. CRIMMEL, individually and as trustee of the Sharon E. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, by means of 9—Physical presence or ❑ online notarization, who Qm personally lal,own to me or 0 has produced a driver's license as identification, and who did take an oath. NOTARY PUBLIC; Sigii.� rint rJc-4c. NATALIE DUENAS F State of at Large Notary Public -State of Florida Florida ;t, Commission 9GG 185828 My Commission Expires; t0u`0-% I b t 2a 22 My Comm. Expires Mar 16, 2022 Bonded through National Notary Assn. �VRet�,t+ r AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUNBERS(SJ eL-zazz000lo42 E 2L-2o22aoa1o43 I, applicable) of untler oath, that I a 1. I have die re, appiia 2. All an: attach 3. I have for the 4. The F resMc 5. We/I e in any 'Notes • //the applicant l: • If (he applicant i typically be signe • If the applcant 1: • 11 the applicant i partneY' of the nl • If the applicant YE • In each Instance use the approprt, Untler penalties of perjury, I declare that I have reatl the foregoing Affidavit of AuthorhnSon antl that the facts stated in it are [rue. cj Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER C%OB-COA-OOlIS155 REV 3/d12020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S)__ PL-2o2200o104z s Pr.-zOzz00o1043 I, /A�JOf Wa��� (print name), as (title, if applicable) of (company, If a Ilcable), swear or aKnn under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner appllcaniQcontrect purchaser and that: 1. I have full authorhy to secure the approvel(s) requested antl to Impose covenants and resbictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions In Uis application and any sketches, date or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a pad of this application ere honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County [o enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved actlen. 5. We/I authodze `TO�son Development Associates, Inc. to act as our/my repreaentatiVe in any matters regarding This petition Inclutling i ihreugh 2 above. 'Notes: • 1/the applicant is a corporation, then It is usually executed 6y the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limtted Liability Company (LLC.) or Lrmded Company (LC.), then the documents shoo/d typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member" • 1(the applicant is a partnership, then typically a padner can sign on behalf oI me partnership. • 1/the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified es the 'general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name end the words °as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the epplMsnt's status, e.g., indlvldual, crorpomfe, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format /orthaf ownership. Untler penalties of perjury, I tleclare that I have read the foregoing AfNdavit of Authorization and that the tetra stated in it are�Vt(�\�`\�e. E""' ' a ate STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Th bregeing I W raves acknowleged before me by means of [�ihysicel�a Bence o ❑ Ifne notarization this JY day of �h� 20�, by (pdnlad name o/owner or qualifier) /y.rd( )'I(�1 rv/ , �Su/cyr5 moots) Notary Public oat check applicable box: CI Are pemanally knoV:m tp e ❑ Has produced a tune drivers license ❑ Has produced 0 anti 'tlo Natery Signature: 4 � 'Ny�"?r*- 0[aRgKa 93Ef,'Ix"s'sordo�i�a,2016 amaxr' crave-con-pousrss nevvgnpza AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) _ Susan Wright PL-20220001042 & PL-202.2.0001043 Susan Wright rin#name , as I' -- - --- -- — - {p ) _ _ (title, if applicable) of _ (company, if a 7 Iicabia), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one owner ]applicantDcontract purchrasrroand that: t _ I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County In accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Johnson E evelopment Associates, Inc :{to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 thrangh 2 above. *Notes; • if the applicant is a corporation, then It is usually executed by the core, pros, or v, pros. • if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member," • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. = if the applicant is a trust, then they most Include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate rormat for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In It are true. nattrie .____r2 4 401A-i)l - Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER T e fnrr>.gnpty.ln4lntment was acknowleged before me by means of C t l,iiy tr:�i xcs �rrc;r or ❑ online-. notarization this day of � prt!.A,Y 292Z, by (printed name of owner orqualifier),U a ! Xr(�prsnn(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: e 1mrsonilly known tome El Has produced a current drivers license ElHas produced as Identiilcation, 1 j Notary Signature: Julio M. W01fo Nolaty Pubi6., Slsio of Ohl I rvfiy r;oinnd�. �iah t:Sµlrr:ri �r(ptl�)' Cl'UTA-COA-OQ 1151 t 55 REV 3/4/2020 THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORMS Jol�naon Development Associates, Inc. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HOR9E6HOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 ww.collier¢ov.net 1239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6398 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the entaee of such interest: Name and Address %of Ownership N/A b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION list the officers and stockholders end the oercentaee of stock owned by each: Name and Address %of Ownership N/A c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE list the beneficiaries of the trust with the enta¢e nF interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Created 9/28/2017 Page t of 3 Co�e�n�y COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLE6, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 262-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6368 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address I %of Ownership N/A e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, Including the officers. stockholders. beneficiaries. or oartners: Name and Address %of Ownership Johnson Development Associates, Inc., 700 Dunbar Sf., Spananburg, SC 29308 George D. Johnson, Jr, 2D09 Revocable Trust 100 Dunbar SL, Spartanburg, SC 29308 50% GD Johnson III Revocable Trust UAD 1/23/1], 1g0 Dunbar SL, Spartanburg, SC 29306 25% SJ Sheniron Revocable Trust UDA 9/13/19, 1 W Dunbar 51., Spartanburg, SC 29306 25% Pleaee note that George D sohnaon, Sr., ® Sohneon III Date of Contract: s SS Shannon are Bole beneficiaries of each respective trust If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g, Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option tG buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GRONRH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliier¢ay.net )239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6368 Date of option: Date option terminates: _ Anticipated closing date: Any petklon Requirement Individually � immediately As the author Included in th in the delay c The complete Agent/Owns Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President $CEO Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Property Ownership Disclosure I, Trent Johnson have reviewed the information maintained by Harbert Management Corporation regarding direct and indirect beneficiaries and equitable interest holders for the owner of the Property, SRG CN FL, LLC ("Owner"). In conjunction with the Property Ownership Disclosure form for this project, please note the following as of the date of this attachment, to the best of my knowledge following such review: • No one individual person has a director indirect interest of more than 5% in Owner, unless disclosed by name in an attached document. Owner is indirectly controlled by Harbert Management Corporation ("HMU), an Alabama corporation, which is controlled by its board of directors. HMC's affiliated SEC registered investment adviser, Harbert Fund Advisors, Inc. ("HFA "), serves as the investment manager to Harbert Seniors Housing II, LLC (and its members), which is an indirect controlling parent of Owner and itself indirectly controlled by HMC. A copy of HFA's current written disclosure statement discussing Company's business operations, services, and fees is available upon written request, or available for download at www. adviserinfo. sec. gov/firm/110577. • None of the officers or employees of Owner who are involved with the day-to-day operation and management of the Property are County employees or elected officials. • None of the officers or employees of Owner who are involved with the day-to-day operation and management of the Property is a close relative of a County employee or County elected official. The foregoing information is to the best of my knowledge and offered solely in my capacity as an authorized representative of Owner, and not personally. 2/28/2023 DATE [22-C M P-0113 2/1763327/11 EAST\197286330.2 4853-6815-8798.4 SRG CN FL, In Trent John Authorized PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS AND OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGES OWNER OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGE Whitley S. Ward 25% 2171 Forrest Lane Naples, FL 34102 Cynthia E. Crimmel, Successor Trustee of the 25% John E. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 3, 1987 2171 Forrest Lane Naples, FL 34102 Sharon Crimmel, as Trustee of The Sharon 25% Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 3, 1987 c/o Captain John Crimmel 2682 Outrigger Lane Naples, FL 34104 Charles E. Herring 1/12" 392 7th Avenue S Naples, FL 34102 Todd W. Ward 1/12" 846 93rd Avenue N Naples, FL 34108 Susan W. Wright, Trustee of the Susan W. 1/12" Wright Revocable Trust U/A May 15, 2019 5867 Miller Run Back Road Lucasville, OH 45648 Prolaw: 703616 Cynthia E. Crimmel, Charles E. Herring Susan W. Wright, Trurtee Successor TrusteeM 392 T" Ave. South Susan W. Wright Rev TRT of John E. CrimmelNaples, FL 34102 586] Miller Run Back RE Declaration of trust8.333% Wcasvie, DH 45648 2o9rvw Lone Street 8.333% Dundee, OR 97116 25% COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliieregv.net (239) 262-2400 FAX: (239) 262-6368 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: anv petition mq 0.equlre tslor individually or wl immediately It sw As the authorized included in this sul In the delay of pro The completed ep Agent/Owner SlF AFFIF co-ed to have retition types ar th a Trustee, Cc h change occurs agent/applicant �mittal package. I :essing this petit rlicatlon, ail regr nature Agent/Owner ame (please print) Created 9/28/2017 page 3 of 3 Co�n`9 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROIMH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLE6, FLORIDA 34104 www.colllergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAx: (239) 262-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Dbclosure, will nat be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition tYPes ere located on the associated application form. Any<hange In ownership whether IndlvlduallY or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-hglding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior tq the pe0tlon's final public hearing. As [he authorized agent/applicant for this peil[lon, I attest [hat all of [he Information Indicated on This checklist is included in this submFttal package.) understandthatfailuretq Include all necessary submktal infartnation may resuh In [he delay of processing this petition. the completed application, all required submktal matedals, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Hgrteshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 �1/. ent/Own Signature as At orney-in-Fact for Sharon Date �t Cximmel 1 nnialn � n f �n mn�l ,T . Agent/ ner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 page 3 of 3 n. Co Nt County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.calliernov net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 Date of option: Date option terminates: _ or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form, Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately If such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is Included in this submittal package. i understand that failure to include all necessary submittal Information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN! Business Center 2800 Narth Horseshoe Drive Napl s, FL 34104 Agent wner5ignature Dat Y� t � 4AgeOwner Name e (pieasetprr print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 LIMITED DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BY THIS LIMITED DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, I, SHARON T. CRIMN4EL, individually and as trustee of the Sharon E. Crimniel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, resident of Naples, Collier County, Florida, appoint my son, JOHN E. CIUMMEL, JR., as my attorney -in -fact for the limited purposes contained herein. This durable power of attorney shall not be affected by any physical or mental disability that 1 may suffer except as provided by statute, and shall be exercisable from this date. All acts done by niy attorney-iu-fact pursuant to this power shall bind me, my heirs, devisees and personal representatives. This power of attorney is nondelegable, t grant unto my attorney -in -fact full power and authority to negotiate the sale and conveyance of the following described property on such terms and conditions as my attorney-in-faet may deem proper: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25, East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of said Section 2, North 2°1.4'00" West 1049.41 feet; thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89°51'42" West 100,07 feet to the West right of way line of State Road 31 and the Place ofBeginning of the parcel herein described; thence continuing parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89'51'42" West 1250.68 feet to the West line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2; thence along said West line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North 1 °57'50" West 347.75'; thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North 89°5 P42" East 1249.04 feet to the West right of way line of State Road 31; thence along said West right of way line, South 2'14'00" East 347.75 feet to the Place of Beginning; being a part of the Fast 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 bast, Collier County, Florida. I hereby revolve any and all limited powers of attorney previously made by me, authorizing any person to do any act relative to the above described property. All tights, powers, and authority of said attorney -in -fact to exercise any and all of the rights and powers herein granted shall commence and be in Hill force and effect thereafter until the earlier of (i) one year from the date of executing this power of attorney, or (ii) the filing of a revocation of this power of attorney in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Limited Durable Power of Attorney at Naples, Florida, this 3c-4 day of September, 2020. Signed and delivered as to both in out, presence: N c, E-cL,jj e O v-e —, -t Z;=7= Lt -W --'-J Ga OD MA'J Type or print name of Witness No. 2 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 'file foregoing instrument was acluiowledged before me this `-"" clay of September, 2020, by SHARON T. CRIMMEL, individually and as t;•ustee of the Sharon E. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, by means of QVbysical presence or ❑ online notarization, who 0-is- personally known to me or ❑ has produced a driver's license as identification, and who did take an oath. NOTARY PUBLIC: Sign Print kk-4c- 6-c .DL.rer o,, NA7ALIE QUENAS .- -, No . State of Florida at Large Commission 9 GG 185828 i �, a 2 "Z p Mum h 2 My Commission Expires: t My Comm. Expires Mar 16, 2022 Bonded through National Notary Assn. :i R . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLESS FLORIDA 34104 www colliereov net (239) 252-2400 FA%: (239) 252-fi358 Date of option: Dale option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIPlNFORMATION Any pi RequRi individi immed As the Include in the d The completed application, all required submit Growl 281 Agent/Owner 5 gnature Agem/Owner Name (please Odnt) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLEB�FL0RIOA 34104 wwwxolliereov.net (239( 252-2400 FA%: (239) 252-6388 Date of option; Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: Y P< qulrc lividi medl the. ludei he d ent/ �nUl Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Www,coil Iergoy.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: coil fi `Y C014-ftty 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 or =._ - AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form, Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately If such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing, As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist Is included in this submittal package. I understand thatfailure to Include all necessary submittal Information may result In the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department -11 ATTN., Business Center i 2800 North Horseshoe Drive -(A41 vY1,4 � � 1�Q Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Sigii✓r birf, Agent/Owner Name (plea.SV print) Created 9/28/2017 J Date Page 3 of 3 (PL-20220001042) INSTR 5731735 OR 5645 PG 3462 RECORDED 6/26/2019 10:45 AM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0.70 REC $27.00 CONS $1.00 PREPARED BY, RECORD AND RETURN TO: Joshua D. Howard Johnson Oliver & Howard LPA Post Office Box 15.05 Portsmouth, Obi 'A .6 _ `( WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY-DEEPWARRANTY-DEEP made this 15th day ofMay, 2019, between Susan W. Wright and Christopher A. Wright; -liar, usband, whose address is 5867 Millers Run Back Run Road, Lucasville, Ohio 45648, herein er called the "Grantors", and Susan W. Wright, Trustee, Susan W. Wright Revocable Trust U/A ` fty �, ' 5, 2019, whose address is 5867 Millers Run Back Run Road, I,ucasville, Ohio 45648, here �t filled the "Grantee". WITNESSETH: That the Gram good and valuable considerations to the C hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, barg Grantee, and her successors and assigns being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: An undivided one -twelfth interest Commencing at the Southeast corner 25 East, Collier County, Florida: in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other .and paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is ise and release, convey and confirm unto the pllowing described land, situate, lying and described property: ownship 49 South, Range Thence along the East line of said Section 2, No 20.44' 00" West 1049.41', thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of ,z oiheast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89' 51' 42" West l(Q: -the West right of way line of State Road 31 and the PLACE OF BEGINNINQ` t e,. parcel herein described; thence continuing parallel with the North line of° 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89' 51' a2`' 1250.68' to the West line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2'ri' e along said West line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North` 1' 50" West 347.75'; thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of t`! - Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, North 890 51' 42" East 1249.04' to the West right of way line of State Route 31; thence along said West right of way line, South 20 14' 00" East 347.75' to the PLACE OF BEGINNING; being a part of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, containing 9.97 acres, more or less. Generally known as 6869 Airport Road, Naples, Florida 34109. OR 5645 PG 3463 Parcel No. 00238040007. This Deed is made subject to the lien of every mortgage of record in said County given to secure the payment of money and remaining unreleased at the date of delivery here f, and to real estate taxes, zoning and use restrictions imposed by goverripte . tauthority, restrictions and easements common to the subdivision, and outstan rx`i ,g,"kg�s and mineral interests of record, if any. rsein�K,LV • e property conveyed to Grantor, Susan W, Wright, by deed dated December 20 . E8, from Charles E. Herring as Trustee of The Herring Family Trust, dated De&i6er'7, 2016, recorded in Official Records Book 5583, Page 1265, Instrument No. 5651.5.97 P. blic Records of Collier County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH ',. and: the singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise apf , 111k. TO HAVE AND TO THIS CONVEYANCE IS Restrictions, reservations 2. Taxes and assessments for the 3. Applicable zoning and other in fee simple forever. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: of record, if any. Grantors further covenant with the Grantee that't&'� authority to convey the property and Grantors warrant tk Grantors and will defend the title against the lawful claims c under Grantors. The subject property is not the homestead pr of Grantors' family, nor is the property contiguous to property of Grantors' family. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have signed and year first above written. Signed in the Presence of: joshua D. and Amy C. gand -2- years. ons. have good right and lawful the property for any acts of suns claiming by, through or rtGrantors or any member fir' y:Qraptors or any member the day and Susan W. Wright Christopher A. WxJkW *** OR 5645 PG 3464 *** STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF SCIOTO, SS: BEFORE ME, a Notary Public, in and for said County and State, personally appeared the above named Susan W. Wright and Christopher A. Wright, who acknowledged that they did sign the foregoing instrument and that the same is their free act and deed, and are personally known to me. IN TES':I QN WHEREOF,1 have hereunto set my hand and official seal this 15thday of May RY PtlATTOR g ST?t"1'E MY COQM w EXPIR C�` SECTION -3- INSTR 5651597 OR 5583 PG 1265 E-RECORDED 12/20/2018 2:38 PM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0.70 REC $27.00 INDX $1.00 CONS $10.00 Prepared (without opinioi Joseph L. Lindsay, Esq. Lindsay & Allen, PLLC 13I80 Livingston,. R oad, 4 Naples, FL 341:99% . THIS TRUSTEE',' Charles E. I-3erring as ' ("Grantor"), to the folio share: (I) Charles E. Hen Naples, Florida 341.02, (2, Avenue North, Naples, FI office address is 5867 Mil WITNESSETH, tf Trust, dated December 7, valuable consideration in I conveys, and confirms un forever all of the right, t situated in Collier County, rwriva: Legal Description: An undivided 25% interest in the property,``ds�fbc.,d in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Physical Address: 6869 Airport Road North, Naples, FL 34109 Parcel I.D. No.: 00238040007 TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. THIS CONVEYANCE IS SUBJECT TO ALL -OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Restrictions, reservations and casements of record, if any; 2. Taxes and assessments for the current and subsequent years; and 3. Applicable zoning and other governmental regulations. Grantor hereby covenants to and with Grantee that Charles E. Herring presently serves as the sole Trustee under The Herring Family Trust, dated December 7, 2016, that the said Trust is OR 5583 PG 1266 in full force and effect, that the said Trustee is empowered by the said Trust to enter into this deed, and that all things preliminary to and in and about this conveyance and the laws of the State of Florida have been followed and complied with in all respects. Grantor further covenants with the Grantee that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to convey,tl said property and Grantor warrants the title to the property for any acts of Grantor and wj:l,,' e, nil the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor. Tne r;. jcct property is not the homestead property of the Grantor or any member of Grantor's farri'�,i' the property contiguous to property resided on by Grantor or any member of Grantor stfariS .,,Joan S. Herring died on February 19, 2017. IN WITNESS above written. GRANTOR: F, the Grantor has hereunto set its hands the day and year first Charles E. Herring as Trustee'6f Th+ Family Trust, dated December 7, 20 392 7th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER WITNESSES TO GRANTOR: -- Name:�' Address: y� p , �_-L The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before i Charles E. Herring as Trustee of The Herring Family Trust, dt take an oath. and who is personally known to me or did produce as identification, Name: Notary Publ' State of December ?!1, 2018 by ember 7, 2016, who did *** OR 5583 PG 1267 *** EXHIBIT A Commencing at the Southeast corner »f Section 2, Township 49 South, Range. 25 East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East lina of said Section 2, North 26 '14' 00" West 1049.411, thonca parallel with tha North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 896 51' 42" West 100,07! to the West Right of. Way Xine of Stata Road'31.end the PLACE OF BEGINNING of tha parcel herb n described; thence continuing parallel with the North line of the South;:1'/,2, �f�.the Northeast 1/4 of the thee 4 of said Section 2, South 890 51!<4�250.b8' to the West a�Rh� 2 of the Southeast 1/4 of saidl4cti 2;., thence along as 1{s na o t 1/2 of the. Southaast, 1/4 of said. ' et , North 1°• 57' eat 347.75'; t parallel with tha North line of tji outh, 1/2 of the or 4 of the Sou ee t 1/4 of said Section 2, North 89°I.,I ,1'.�42.",:i+�at 1249. 4' o We of W 1 ne of State Road 31; thence alolig sa�d'Peb� Righ o W lin th'2 .14' !' at 347.75' to the PLACE OF BEGINNING- .bgng a Epee ou heset 114 of Section`2, Township Jo Sodi ; RgAge 25 t, Co 1 or C n o d ; ontsining•9.97.ecrea more or lies. (�^ This Deed is made `bjact to the lien of every mortgage of racord in said, County Riyen to secufa' h..,.ent of Nonay,and remaining unraleesed at the date of delivary hereof, and t. . state taxes; zoning and usa restrictions imposad by governmental authorit j es r tions and easements common to the subdivision; end outstanding oil, ass ait interests of record, if any. 3 INSTR 5394640 OR 5385 PG 1608 E-RECORDED 4/21/2017 8:55 AM PAGES DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0.70 AEC $27.00 INDX $2.00 Prepared (without opinion) by and return to: Joseph L. Lindsay, Esq. Lindsay & Allen, PLLC 13180 Livingston , oad, Suite 206 Naples, FL SPECf `><, "114IIS DEED is made thigh", known as Joan S. Ward, joined by h Herring and Joan S. Herring as ea-' 2016, whose post office address is power and authority to protect, cc dispose of the property hereinafter di NTY DEED TO TRUSTEE Hof 4Jcr, 2016, by Joan S. Herring, formerly i ycd Charles E. Herring ("Grantor"), an Cl r s y E. r g 1 he Herring Famil'Trust, dated li A .Rnue South, Naples, Florida 34102, with full IIv:,1' 4se, encumber and otherwise manage and WI"TNESSCTII, that Grantor, for and iir''si1. lion of the sum of $10,00, and other ,,. good and valuable consideration in hand paid 15y the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alicns' ,. , na ps releases, conveys and confirms unto Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, administPiitfSr§,"',cassigns forever all of the right, title, and interest Of Grantor in the following described lids » din Collier County, Florida: Legal Description: An undivided 25% interest in the propel "'described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. r , Physical Address: 6869 Airport Road North, Naples, Fl, 34109 Parcel I.D. No.: 00238040007 a TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditantents thereto belonging Or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the saute in fee simple forever. THIS CONVEYANCE, IS SUBJECTTO ALL OF THI? FOLLOWING: 1. Restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any; 2. Taxes and assessments for the current and subsequent years; and 3. Applicable zoning and other governmental regulations. OR 5385 PG 1609 GRANTOR 1-IERE13Y COVENANTS with Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the Property in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the Property and hereby warrants the title to the Property and will defend same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor, The subject property is not the homestead property of the Grantor or any member of Grantor's family nor is the property contiguous to,.pr 9p !y resided on by Grantor or any member of Grantor's family. 1N WI11S IEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hands the day and year first above written. GRANTOR: Joan S. Herring 392 7th Avenue South Naples, Florida 34102 Charles E. Herring 392 7th Avenue South Naples, Florida 34102 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY Of COLLIER WITNESSES TO BOTH GRANTORS: Name: Address: Name; ,,h0dress: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged be S. Herring and Charles E. Herring, each of whom is 1;1. T> t-- as identification and (SEAT.,) N0Q(1,i��i a ; a Ps 09, c�'' o►so :',k NFF907902 ,d 4 '�y0i, . d'y y3 • O , SiAt���;� \0�,� Notary Public, N4uesu4ar-1, 2016 by Joan nown to me or did produce m did take an oath. of *** OR 5385 PG 1610 *** EXHIBIT A Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; thence slang the East line of said Saction 2, North 2° 14' 00" West 1049.41' thence parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89' 51' 42" WeaK 100.07' to thG,r1V*6 t Right of Way line of State Road 31 and the PLACE OF AEGINNING of the parcelth. sin described: thence continuing parallel with the North line of the Sou kt''1/ `$' the Northeast 1/4 of the $oathesst 1/4 of said Section 2, South 89° 51 u2''W 1250.65' to the Wast 11'a �cj, 11c" � y1'-2 of the Southeast 1/4 of anidS �9)} •2r. thence slang sa �I�CoTb�IfnQ'o'N1�cyF,,���t 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of AA d,i`s4�tian`2, North 11 57' Vast 347.7511 Ehlip4\,parollal with the North line ;Ehh�..Sou h 1/2 of the oras�l 4 of the Soulb as t 1/4 of said Section 2, North 89p,5.1t 2i!'list 1249. 4' tolkhe Ia 'Rig h aE W •y 1 no of State Road 31; thence along said•�. c7st Righ of W in TSB th 2 1,4' 0011 at 347,75' to the PLACE OF DEGINNINCI`teing a pn� a h eu heast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 49 S' th, Range 25 Ea t, Co 1 er C n t1e d i ontaining.9,97 acres meee or leas. •,. <„ram. This Deed is mp'd/xubjert to tha lien of every mortgage of record in said County given to sec&e pay •ant of money and remaining unreleased at the date of delivery hereof, and E`o 01, state taxes; zoning and use restrictions imposed Gy governmental authority raxLr ctiona and easemonta common to the subdivisioni and outstending oil, gna,aritlni,dr intereata of record, if any. Best Available Image INSTR 5342794 OR 5341 PG 583 E-RECORDED 12/7j2016 4:16 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0.70 REC $27.00 INDX $2.00 Prepared (without opinion) by and return to: Joseph L. Lindsay, Esq. Lindsay & Allen, PLLC 13180 Livingston Road, Naples, FL 34,.109;'%.. .., Suite 206 SPECS ; WARRANTYDEEDTO TRUSTEE THIS DEED is made this. <; .�ly. of er, 2016, by Joan S. Herring, formerly known as Joan S. Ward, joined by h h .pd Charles E; Herring ('Grantor" ), an C ar s E. Herring and Joan S. Herring as co-T, s ;f The Herring Family Trust, dated T2a 2016, whose post office address is`'7t;;' venue South, Naples, Florida 34102, with full power and authority to protect' .'' lease, encumber and otherwise manage and cone�,, , dispose of the property hereinafter describe t� ("atee"). WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and good and valuable consideration in hand p� acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, unto Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, a title, and interest of Grantor in the following c Legal Description: An undivided 25% interest in the hereto and incorporated herein. Physical Address: 6869 Airport Road North, Naples, FL 34 Parcel I.D. No.: 00238040007 TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. of the sum of $10.00, and other the receipt Of which is hereby releases, conveys and confirms d assigns forever all of the right, dated in Collier County, Florida: K described in Exhibit A attached TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. THIS CONVEYANCE IS SUBJECT TO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any; 2. Taxes and assessments for the current and subsequent years; and 3. .Applicable zoning and other governmental regulations. OR 5341 PG 584 GRANTOR HEREBY COVENANTS with Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the Property in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the Property and hereby warrants the title to the Property and will defend same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor. The subject property is not the homestead property of the Grantor or any member of Grantor's family nor is the property contiguous to propey resided on by Grantor or any member of Grantor's family. IN WITI�$$` W above written. Joan S. Herring 392 7th Avenue South Naples, Florida 34102 Charles E. Herring 392 7th Avenue South Naples, Florida 34102 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER , the Grantor has hereunto set its hands the day and year first WITNESSES TO BOTH GRANTORS: Name: Address: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged bd S. Herring and Charles E. Herring, each of whom is �L . as identification and (SEAL) �������unu'un,� J`O```�Sl NOq �� �PGU9,?pjy�m: _fit; a►�e ;*± yo ;#FF907902� 'ice "99 °°&h �a� L1��; • pQ �� Name: Notary Public, s r -l_, 2016 by Joan known to me or did produce om did take an oath. *** OR 5341 PG 585 *** EXHIBIT A Commepcing at the Southeast corner of Section 2,. Township 49 South, Range• 25'Eset'. Collier County, Florida; 'thence eldng the East line•of said Section 2, North 2°, 141•00" Waet 1049.41' thence parallel with the North line of•the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4.of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section2, South 89° 51' 42" Weat 100.07! to the West 'Right of. Wey Jine of State Road'31,and• the PLACE OF BEGINNING. of the Par f;VIZN1250.68' in described: thence continuing•perellel with the North line of the South,-4.the Northeast 1/4 of the bees 4 of edid Sdction 2,.South 896 , to the West 2 of the •Southwest 1/4 o£.- said. Sect' 2� thence along so 4j9 no o t .1/2 of the. Southeast• 1/4 of'esid'';. �`�` oI . ', North 1°• 57' eat 347.151; parallel with•the North line of h¢^"$o t •1'/2 of the or 4 of the Sou as t 1/4 of eaid Section 2,: North 89:.'..l!.::4• pa et 1249. 4' o We of'W 1 ne of State Rood 311 thence ei, "'dtW�at Righ o W in th 2 .14' !' at 347.75' to the PLACE ON` BEG NNZNC. .1tgging a pa h ou }iaest 114.df Sedtion12, Township 49.Sou k r m�igo 25 Ea t, Co 1'er C n o d ; dnteining•9.97,ecfep- more' or •leas. This Deed is made, bject.to the lien of every mortgega of -record in.se3d• County given' to see r. the payment of money and remaining unreleased at the date of delivery hereof, and•to'r ei estate t.xeai zoning and use restrictions imposed by governmental euthorit ;' aet�;ctiona end.easaments'common•to the subdivision; . and'outstend�ng oil,'gae,;e d..�mir@1 interests of record; if any. r•' Best Available Image 0 t.i•3 f.� / p 10t !tt •� �t n S6 1 � 5 8 ©oust C"tT MEMM OR BOOK 001960 PACE Fora pttl,l WI►1lRAM'1' UMI UT NO itDndSHARON T. CR1MMtt TlsWORNwI. day 19, bet"" Toslaal list C.ef s MZMkrw1, 03a* of Coliwe, same of no". t:imw e. aa! SItARONi T. CRiMMCt., an T"MM elf at, Sf1ARON T. CRIMMCi. MCI ARATM OF IMM 4MW 0C 2, IM, -Moos port office addroa is 676 IrWAM kW tans. Naples. PiaWa Mr 3J940. tfrrNee+. nip WRNP,551: f'ii, Ilia ON tlrsaw, for and is corlsiderso" of the MM of TIN UOLW► eOh Odw good and valu" eeaeWerstiona to sold Gets". In Mad MW by oW ( M00, the receipt -� f is Ilmlly aekato-ledjad. Me paMad, bertdeted esd aaW to dw mid Oraawm, sad OroeMee•e wceaeon is trtrt rd aaMlrr foravN, dna (all wM/ deredbW toad, aitasae, lying sad being in Collier County, Plaids, wwit: ex: N w An undivided 259 interest in and ter 'be propeety. rn Comm"Wini%u the Southesot comer of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier Cnunty;:t"icifi ,& thence along Uwe Bast line of sold Section 2, North 2° 14' 00' Wen 1049.41', penes pin �wittt the North tine of the Sou111 1/2 of the Northeast 111 of the Southeast 1J4 of mid sect!' .7�'�5090-INNINO 51' 42. West 100.M' to the Wert Right of Way line of State Road 31 and the P �Cof the panel heroin described; thence continuingparoliei with theNorthlinenikA l/2 of the Northeast i/4 of the Southeast 114 of mid Section 2, South 99. $1. 42' Weal' lAl to the Wet Line of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2; thence along mid Wet line of the Halt 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of mid section 2, r North 1. 37' 50' Wet•°347., V., thence pudlel with the North line of the South 1/2 of the ! Northeast 1/4 of the Siva 1/4 of said Section 2, Noah 89.$1' 42' East 1249.04' to 11e Wet N o Rigbi of Way line of Su�oad ai; thence along mid West Right of Way line, South 2° 14' 00' O v Hann 347.75' to the PLACE OF SINNING; being a part of the Past It2 of the Southeast 1/4 M of Section 2, Township 49 StM(th{t nge 23 East, Collier County, Florida; containing 9.97 acres ts� more or less. w 1,:+ �. O c.a SUBJECT TO restrictions, rcaerV�( `` eammats of record, and taxes for year 1992 and subsequent yore, Prior Instrument recorded in O.R. Booi¢r1350,. ige 2178, Folio 00239040007. •t' Grantor warrants that this is not homestead p.. 1< .jut her homestead property Is located at 676 f Fountainhead Lane, Nsplea, Florida 33940. And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the 1i0wtd'.�°.,'11�land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persona whomsoever. '';'•`'✓ Trustee heroin (or the successor trustee) is granted full Power3n� thority to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise to rnsnage and dispose of the real proportyktesc ' herein as set forth in Florida Statutes Section 699.071. Ij ;/'"� n I pf Trust referred to above ahail Upon the death of the trustee, the successor trustee under the � l�t� , be JOHN E. CRIMMHL, and upon a reconWion in the Public Records oF''Calligl`County, Florida of a death C3 C,y er � r—n cm O IG� tV M m t" This dyed xas prepared without le8at opinion by and, after reeordln8, should ben rerarntd rPyr, ' Breen [Jk, Attorneys, Smut 106, 3033 Riviera Drive, Naples, Florida 33940; Tdephonr: 813.649-7778. 6der,¢m!r. Tax N. i A-1 lames/� Les Clpi, �, C• ly • .• 1�58 8�1585 OR BOOK PAGE oatttdritaM of tlse treraY: tti/lt a tRe MM inMdit+dl 1latroia ewsli be iersrd l,etd try the asnaaau► uaaY ■tdnw tlYe tom! !vet s ! 4� ht+tYelw V • Mjme•' star/-ammIY•• as UW fee N d1 / �• Y WNW ft"fta. ,� CI► W WRtiCVffi[f1 NItiK rAW, Otsmo e b s berrnrtb ne GmWe's b0 d the day sal yew frnl atrots wrirtrts, r Of pelf ..r.. of Witnar llNo. I rr C= M co STATE OF pLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instratnea( 5HARON T. CRIMMM, who mod who did mks an Qath. t .' T acknowledged before me this ZV,* day of4mosow, IM, by sliv ka"m to ms or wbo has produced a driver's license as identification NOTARY PUBLIC; �i ` BARBARA E. BROWNEt-1- �r ,�� 97�3 of Florida at Lugs pWARY fUWICt +Skf! 0t -1 30, I At LARJi MY CAAi#AISS'014 EXPIRAS JUL't 70997 CDtlN1iSa10D Eapirea. UONOtD tHBU AOENT'S NOTARY 8S0K4RA61 This deed was prepared without legal opinion by and, aJhr recording, should be returned to' 4mex di ZJk. Attorneys, Suite 106, 3033 Rivisra Drive, Naples, Florida 31SM0,• Telephone, 813-649-7778, s <r �ibcr609 And varil' d µk,Ult: t fN�Y, flOR1KP COL1ocoUN ORID/t�jaME Records #11,f5, lftl A-2 JAWS C. GII E9 'Lrm 0 1.1 8 i. 5 7 2 1908 HAY 20 ,AM 10: 16 COLLIER COUNTY RECORDED PRfJt 'rRUSTrJD ' DOCiNT - iND-.----THIS INDENTURE; made'thia 9 day of May 19 @$_, by BARNETr BANKS TRUST COMPANY; N.A:, as Trustae, hereinaftercalled the "Grantor",' to. o Whitley, S.'Ward', an Undivided 25% Interest as Tenant -in -Common, Joan S.•Ward, an ;:0 0 Undivided 25% Intereat as. Tenant -in -Common, John E. Crimmel, an Undivided 25% Interest as Tenant -in -Common; Sharon T: Crimmel., an Undivided 25% Interest aq� o, Tenant -in -Common hereinafter called the "Grantee (M cWn cn whose post office address is: Suite No. 304 900 6th Avenue, South Naples, Florida 33940 WITNESSETH, that Grantor, in consideration of. the sum'of ,Ten Dollars ,ell. sell. and other. good, and valuable considerations in hand paid; doe's hereby.grantell. and convey unto .Gran`• ee, the*following described real.property, situate,' tying and Cj being in _ Colli''o�? ty, Florida, together with the V tenements and appurtenances thereunto belongih -wit: b" r Commencing at the Sat1hL\ corner -of Section 2, Township 49 South, .Range. 25 East, M. Collier County, Flor}:d t3,h dice along the East line of said Section 2, North 2°• 14' 00", West 1049.41'', t c�} parallel with the North line of the South 1/2, of the ' Northeast '1/4,of'the So6ast 1/4 .of said Section. 2, South 890 51' 42" West 100.07! ' to the West 'Ri Right of.Wa 11rtegelE State Road 31.and the PLACE OF BEGINNING of the g y parcel herein described: 'Lgncontinuing parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of. the Northeast 1,'.f ,the Southeast 1/4 of aaid Section 2, South 89°_ 51,' 42" West.1250.68' to the,.A'*'e of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of - said Section 2; thence along S'pX,cl W$at line of the East 1/2 of the. Southeaat 1/4 of said section.2','North 1 57 "59-CV1�ts, 347.151; thence parallel with -the North line of the South 1/2 of the NortHe; t 4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2,' North 890 51'' 42" East 1249.04' to't e:>47 d Right of Way line of State Road 31; ;thence along sai:d'Weat Right of Way.ljtie uth'2° 14" 00!' East'347.75' to the PLACE OF BEGINNING; being a part of th2,�'� ju�st}2 'of the Southeast 1/4 of Section `2, z Township 49. South; Range 25 East, Coll idL. G n..y, Florida; containing,9.97,acres• ' more or •less. "` Co \` OON M.✓ 04 A a' ReceiVad $. SSr' �ocu eMary Stamp Ta-X Received $ / G�15g"fntangibta Personal Property Tax COLLIE, OUNTY CLERK OF U TS' 'BY -;DX TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple and to the proper uae,and benefit, forever of said Grantee This Deed is made subject, to the lien of every.mortgage of record in.said. County 'given to secure the'paymant of money 'and remaining unreleaaed at the date of, and to.real estate taxes; zoning and use restrictions imposed of delivery hereauthority; restrictions and.easements common to the subdivision; by governmental of, . and outstanding oil, gas ono.mineral interests of record, if any. 4 �; .a....u,.tw.,r.r,.n..a.n.,.n'r:v,.t•.ar,.rramrv..,c..,nanaurccaantrrcr..M.aa:r..anrs.aall.w::+,..t:Fh`::)i1c:Lf..+A"twit'+:+iv':nr.+.�i....................... ............ ....... _...,...... ,-.. .:..:. , .. „ ... Q0135D OOZ179, OR. BOOK' PAGE IN WITNESS WHEREOF,, Grantor has caused 1ta corporate seal to be, hereto affixed.,' and.has caused its name to be signed`to these presents 'by one of its Vice.Pre'sidenta and attested by one of its -Trust Officers, the day and year 'first above written. ATTEST: BARNETT'BANKS TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Trustee Trust Officer Vice•President ' (CORPORATE SEAL) ;. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence•o£i ,,� a STATE OF: FLORIDA •),` r i COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing.ibst rument was acknowledged -Wore me thi "'dl y 'of May , 19_I by Charles N. StrauQhan as V1 P.dent.of BARNETT BANKS TRUST COMPANY, on behalf of the corporation, as',.Tr_-ustee,'and, by Paul.E. Roadman as Trust Officer of BARN PUBLIC • l�i_O�i J� Xf�s frre� ' NOTARY PUBLIC State of. Florida NOTARY PUDLIC, srAxs OF FLORIDA. My 'Commision'Expires: nrY cunrauaturl EXPIRs>,OCT. Ina 1991. OONUL'U THnU nUTFnY PUnWC UNUCaMiTC110, '•.7 ISM• ; . This deed prepared by; BARNET.T'BANKS TRUST COMPANY, N. A. P. 0. BOX 413008 NAPLES, FLO91DA 33941, 813-263-5596 Recordod ind Vcri(iod In 011iml 17eeords of COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID, JAMES C. GILES, CLERK INSTR 6144068 OR 6027 PG 1932 E-RECORDED 10/15/2021 4:25 PM PAGES 4 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $710,500.00 REC $35.50 CONS $101,5005000.00 ' r t This Instrumen,,f-Irep"'ared 11y: Jonathan Byron,_ E. . Barack Ferrazzand'Kirhbapm 200 West Madison Street= `Suite C1' o IL 60606 & Nagelberg LLP 3900 After Recording Return ta: Retta A. Faulkner Harbert Management Corporation 2100 Yd Avenue North, Suite 600 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Property Folio Number: 0023824001 SPECIAL This Special Warranty Deed made and'"exec Ventas Carlisle, LLC, a Delaware limited liability cofr Suite 3300, Chicago, IL 60654, hereinafter called the limited liability company whose office address is ( Crescent Court, Suite 440, Dallas, Texas 75201, herei 28 day of September, 2021, by )se address is 353 N. Clark Street, o SRG CN FL, LLC, a Delaware i; Management Corporation, 200 ph the grantee: (Wherever used herein the term "grantor" and grantee" include't11 the parties to this instrument, singular and plural, the heirs, legal represi 6,iikes, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns, wherever the cO114Px1`s6'-admits or requires.) s Witnesseth: That.the said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum: �f`S 10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these,pre�ents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the grantee all thkt ertain land situate in Collier County, State of Florida, viz: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Together with all the elements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. 4840-2573-1824.2 OR 6027 PG 1933 And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that it is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that it has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, that it hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said grantor, EXCEPT that this conveyance is SUBJECT TO: (1) all covenants,,conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights, casements, encumbrances, liens and other matters 6fjrc�bj-4 as of the date hereof; (ii) all matters which would be revealed in an accurate survey or inspection of the Property, and (iii) all laws, ordinances and governmental rules, regulations and ii�stfterians affecting the Property. IN W1TNE5S"WI- F EOF, the grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its corporate�seal o be hereunto affixed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year, first written above. [Rennainder of page inlentionally left blank; signature page follows] 4940-2573.18242 OR 6027 PG 1934 Name: A f -�,x &� (i1z k (print) STATE OF COUNTY OF`e�,, ♦ AZ The foregoing iiTsstrum tva gckn�wledg bE �X}Qn p as5r e T �� en4s Realty, Limited Partnership, a Delaware limiter Delaware limited liability company. jfH She as identification. llalii F1111 /f!)),) o` Gherry )r/� = PUg�ho�' _ FA7 LAV VENTAS CARLISLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By. Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, its sole member By: Ventas Inc., a Delaware corporation, its general partner me this 4:�? day of Delaware corporaton V nership, on behalf of Ventas Carlisle, LLC, a so xtally known to rne)or has produced Sign Print 4r-z7�7 L� State of at My Comrnission'Expi Ss: Grantor's signature page to Special Warranty heed KENTUCKY NOTARY ID# KYNP1220t COMMISSION EXPIRES September 05.2Q2b Kil *** OR 6027 PG 1935 *** Exhibit A Legal Description COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EASTA COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECT�N'i2 NtORTH 02°57'30" WEST, 1397.16 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE -SOUTH 89°08'26" WEST, 100.02 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPOpiC P, .ttiLLING ROAD (C.R. 31) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN -:I SCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89008'26" WEST, 602.51 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89"08'26" WEST, 646.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02°41'03" WEST, 97 550 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE; THENCE LONG SAID LINE NORTH 89012'27" EAST, 584,37 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID 6E SOUTH 02°56'50"- EAST, 660.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89"12'27" EAST, 660.26 FEDr TO THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 02°58'50" EAST, 311.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING:_ Exhibit A -I 4840.2573-1824 2 THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Cotier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 28OUNORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES FLORIDA 341O4 (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252'5724 Tr Please complete the following and email to GK8D_Addnauoing@ooUiergov.ned or fax tothe Operations Division at 238-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above oddneou. Form must..be. signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 daVs; for processin . Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FDUD NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) El BL(Blasting Permit) El SDP (Site Development Plan) 8D(Boat Dock Extension) El SDPA (SDP Amendment) Cornivo|/CimuuPermit R SDP|(Insubstantial Change toSDP) CU(Conditional Use) El SIP (Site Improvement Plan) EXP(Excavation Permit) S|P|(Insubstantial Change toSIP) FP(Final Plat SNR(Street Name Change) El LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) GNC(Street Name Change —Unp|otted) PNC(Project Name Change) TDR ofDevelopment Rights) PPL(Plans & Plat Review) VA (Variance) PGP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) Rn PUD Rezone R VRGFP(Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) L] RZ(Standard Rezone) [] OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy ofiengthy description maybe attached) Section 2.Township 40G.Range 25E FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00238040007&00238240001 STREET ADDRESS orADDRESSES (as applicable, ifalready assigned) " LOCATION MAP must beattached showing exact location ofproject/site inrelation tonearest public road right- of-way " SURVEY (copy -needed only for unp|ott*dproperties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP_- orARcxPL# Core -ter Coa u.^ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMEM 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLE9, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliier¢ov.net (2391252-2400 FA% (239) 292-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: � Email ❑ Pax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Paula McMichael, AICP/Stephanie Karol, Permitting Coordinator/Hole Montes, Inc Phone: 239-254- 8 EmailrFax: stephaniekarol@hmeng.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00238040001 Folio Number 00238240001 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number t�/jo, Approved by: JC�� Date: 3/14/2022 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 619f2o1] Page 2 of 2 (PL-20220001042) THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) NARRATIVE AND EVALUATION CRITERIA Haven at North Naples MPUD Rezone Narrative Statement, LDC Evaluation Criteria & GMP Consistency I. Introduction The subject property is comprised of ±27.78 acres and located in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The property has frontage along the south side of Orange Blossom Drive, west of Airport Pulling Road, and frontage on Airport Pulling Road, approximately 645 feet south of Orange Blossom Drive. The property is currently zoned Agricultural, with 17.8 acres including an approved Conditional Use (Res. 1996-405) for a Group Care Facility. The property is designated Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). There is a companion SSGMPA application. The property is partially developed with The Carlisle Naples, a senior living community. There is existing access to Orange Blossom Drive and Airport -Pulling Road via Carlisle Court. The zoning and existing land uses on the surrounding lands is as follows: North: A — Agricultural with a CU; Orange Blossom Dr., then Collier County Library — Headquarters Branch. South: PUD (Bear Creek); multi -family residential. East: CPUD (Italian -American Club), A — Agricultural, RPUD (Naples View), PUD (Lone Oak); Italian American Club, vacant, Airport Rd., single family residential, office uses. West: RPUD (Carlisle Regency), PUD (Sunshine Village), RSF-1; single-family residential, stormwater management lake. The applicant intends to rezone the property from its current Agricultural zoning designation to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) consistent with a companion Small - Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA — PL20220001043) establishing a new subdistrict. The MPUD rezone and GMPA seek to allow for 336 multi -family dwelling units and establish a maximum FAR of 0.65 to allow for The Carlisle Naples (existing memory care/assisted living facility). II. History of Property A portion of the subject site (17.8 acres) includes an existing memory care/assisted living facility (The Carlisle Naples), that was approved through the conditional use process in 1990 (Resolution 96-405). The remaining portion of the subject site is undeveloped. III. LDC Evaluation Criteria A. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Page 1 of 7 HA2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 12-7-2022).doex The subject property currently includes 17.8 acres of an existing assisted living facility (ALF), and 10 acres of vacant land, all within the Agricultural zoning district. The proposed new residential uses for the MPUD rezone will be compatible with the surrounding uses, which include multi -family development to the south, single-family residential to the west, a community facility and library/government services facility to the north and separated from additional single-family residential by Airport Pulling Rd. to the east. To the north of the proposed multi -family development, the existing ALF on the site is three stories in height with a building area of 371,133 square feet. The Bear Creek PUD (Ord. 92-020) is adjacent to the south and permits 120 dwelling units (±14 DU/acre) and a maximum building height of 38 ft./three stories. The property to the south of the Bear Creek PUD is zoned PUD (Keystone Place, Ord. 87-72). The Keystone Place PUD permits 406 dwelling units (±12 DU/acre) and a maximum building height of three stories. The development directly surrounding the property creates a transition to the density and building height of the proposed multi -family development. The project is separated from development to the east by Airport -Pulling Road; and only adjacent to one single-family residence to the west. The subject property has an existing connection to minor arterial roadway Airport Pulling Rd, and an egress only connection to major collector Orange Blossom Dr., which exclusively serves the Carlisle. The existing connection to Airport Pulling Rd. is a right in/right out/left in. There is not a left out at this access, so northbound vehicles make a right out and then make a u turn to be able to head north. The project will provide an additional point of egress to Airport Pulling Rd, which will help disburse additional vehicles trips on a minor arterial roadway (Airport Pulling Rd) to relieve the SB left at Lone Oak Dr for U turning vehicles. The project proposes to use the interconnect to Bear Creek Apartments to the south as a means of emergency/fire access, since this existing connection ties into a double loaded parking area and would not be a good through way for vehicular traffic. The proposed access plan will minimize the need for traffic signals. There is an existing CAT stop along Route 12 on the western side of Airport Pulling Rd. within walking distance of the property (±300 ft). Further, there will be direct access to water, sewer, and other utilities, further establishing this site is well -suited for the addition of residential units and in conjunction with the existing ALF. The application materials will demonstrate adequate capacity on the adjacent roadway network, and available public utilities. B. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. Page 2 of 7 H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 12-7-2022).doex The property is under the ownership of a single entity as evidenced by the ownership documents provided by with MPUD rezone application. Arrangements will be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such facilities that are not provided or maintained at public expense through an association. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -District, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub - District, policy or other provision.) 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict. A companion GMPA application has been submitted to create a new subdistrict to ensure compliance between the GMP and the MPUD zoning. Assuming the proposed GMPA is approved, the MPUD will be consistent with all applicable GMP Goals, Objections and Policies. 2. Compliance with additional GMP provisions. Policy 5.3 — All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan... The subject site is designated Urban Mixed Use District. The requested density is typical for Urban areas in Collier County. A companion GMPA application has been submitted to create a new subdistrict to ensure compliance between the GMP and the MPUD zoning. Assuming the proposed GMPA is approved, the MPUD will be consistent with all applicable GMP Goals, Objections and Policies. Policy 5.6 — New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, and effective October 18, 2004, as amended.) The proposed residential uses and established ALF will be compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses that include a single- and multi- family development. The multi -family buildings will be oriented to provide an increased setback from the single-family property adjacent to the southwest. In addition to orienting the buildings to create separation, the existing residence is setback an additional ± 140 ft. from the property boundary. The western portion of Tract B will be utilized for garages and open space/stormwater management (above and/or below ground). In the eastern portion of Tract B, residential development across Airport Rd. N. in Windward Isle is setback±247 ft. from the property boundary. In addition to increased setbacks, the project will implement sufficient buffering and screening from the existing single-family uses that are adjacent to the subject site. Page 3 of 7 H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 12-7-2022).docx Policy 7.1 - The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The subject property has an existing connection to minor arterial roadway Airport Pulling Rd, and major collector Orange Blossom Dr. serving the existing ALF. No traffic from the multi -family portion of the project will have access to Orange Blossom Dr. The project will provide an additional point of egress to Airport Pulling Rd. to serve the multi -family portion of the project, as well as an emergency access only interconnection to the south via an existing access easement with Bear Creek. Policy 7.2 - The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. As demonstrated by the Transportation Impact Study (TIS) submitted with this application, the property will be developed in a manner that will help decrease additional congestion on nearby collector or arterial roadways as we plan to utilize existing access where practical. The subject property has an existing connection to minor arterial roadway Airport Pulling Rd, and major collector Orange Blossom Dr. serving the existing ALF. The existing connection is a right in/right out/left in. There is not a left out at this access, so northbound vehicles make a right out and then snake a u turn to be able to head north. The project will provide an additional point of egress to Airport Pulling Rd, to serve the multi -family portion of the project which will help disburse additional vehicles trips on a minor arterial roadway (Airport Pulling Rd) to relieve the SB left at Lone Oak Dr for U turning vehicles. The project proposes to use the interconnect to Bear Creek Apartments to the south as a means of emergency/fire access, since this existing connection ties into a double loaded parking area and would not be a good through way for vehicular traffic. The proposed access plan will minimize the need for traffic signals. There is an existing CAT stop along Route 12 on the western side of Airport Pulling Rd. within walking distance of the property (f300 ft). To reduce the project's impact and prevent additional usage on Orange Blossom Dr., the proposed multi -family development will not connect to the existing right - turn only point of egress to Orange Blossom Dr. This egress will continue to be used by the existing ALF/CCRC only. The existing access to Airport Pulling Rd. will remain, and an additional egress only access point is proposed in the southeastern portion of the property. This southern exit will help prevent additional traffic from using the southbound left turn lane that provides access to Lone Oak for U-turns, helping to mitigate impacts to adjacent Page 4 of 7 H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 12-7-2022).doex communities. Details of design for the access and interconnection will be more specifically addressed at time of site development permitting. Policy 7.3 - All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The MPUD Master Plan illustrates existing access to Airport Pulling Rd and Orange Blossom Dr. and proposes an additional point of egress to Airport Pulling Rd., to serve the multi -family portion of the project providing connections to the surrounding area. The project will utilize the existing ingress/egress easement to the south to provide an access point for emergency services. The easement provides for connection to an access drive within the Bear Creek double loaded parking lot, which would not be a desirable throughway for a full interconnection. The internal Bear Creek sidewalk system only provides access from parking to the buildings and does not connect to Airport Pulling Rd. N., resulting in no expansion to the existing pedestrian network. Policy 7.4 - The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The MPUD establishes the existing ALF use and additional multi -family residential dwelling units in an area where there is a mix of single- and multi- family residential developments, and civic facilities (nearby library), creating a blend of densities in the urban area. 3. Compliance with CCME. Policy 6.1.1 - For the County's Urban Designated Area ... as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation standards and criteria... Non -Coastal High Hazard Area Residential and Mixed Use Development Equal to or greater than 20 ac. 25% The proposed MPUD rezoning will meet the required minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards. Approximately 1.55 acres is considered native vegetation. The minimum required native preservation is t0.39 Ac. (25% of 1.55 Ac.). Pursuant to LDC Sec. 3.05.07.H.1.£, the developer will mitigate the preservation requirement off -site or via payment -in -lieu. If mitigated off -site, the developer shall donate ±1.56 Ac. (±0.39 Ac x 4) to Collier County or to another government agency. Page 5 of 7 H12022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 12-7-2022).docx Objective 7.1 - Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) No listed species or signs of thereof were identified on the property due to the poor quality of the habitat. D. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The property is currently zoned Agricultural and abuts properties that allow for various residential uses. The proposed uses are compatible with the existing zoning and the surrounding properties and will provide for adequate screening and buffering from the surrounding properties. Increased setbacks for the multi -family portion of the project are proposed to further ensure compatibility with adjacent uses. E. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed MPUD will provide adequate usable open space. F. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The County charges impact fees (or similar fees) to ensure that there is funding to make any necessary capacity improvements related to sewer and water services, roads, public schools, government buildings including jails, regional and community parks, EMS, libraries, and law enforcement. The developer will be responsible for the cost of any site -related improvements, including but not limited to access improvements and conveyance related improvements to the water and/or sewer distribution system. There will be a requirement to demonstrate "concurrency" at the time of future subdivision plats or Site Development Plan(s) for this project. (The concurrency process ensures that the County has the capacity for Category "A" public facilities and services at the time that project related impacts will affect (require) such services and facilities.) Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in the various elements of the Collier County GMP, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. Page 6 of 7 H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 12-7-2022).docx G. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. There are no issues that would limit the ability of the subject property or the surrounding areas to accommodate this project. H. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The MPUD conforms to the LDC regulations, or contains deviations there from, where appropriate. Page 7 of 7 H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 12-7-2022).doex THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) REZONE CRITERIA THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD REZONE CRITERIA 10.02.08.F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and accommodations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08.E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed change is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) goals, objectives, and policies; and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and the goals, objectives, and policies as applicable, of the Growth Management Plan. There is a concurrent application to create the Airport Carlisle Mixed Use Subdistrict. 2. The existing land uses pattern. The proposed rezone is compatible with the existing land use pattern. Property to the north, across Orange Blossom Drive, is zoned A- Agricultural with an approved Conditional Use and is developed with a Collier County Library. Property to the south is zoned PUD (Bear Creek) and is developed with multi -family residential. Property to the east is zoned A — Agricultural and undeveloped, and CPUD (Italian -American Clubhouse) and developed with the Italian American Club Naples; and across Airport Rd., zoned RPUD (Naples View) and PUD (Lone Oak), and developed with single-family residential and office uses. Property to the west is zoned RPUD (Carlisle Regency), PUD (Sunshine Village), and RSF-1, and developed with single-family residential and a stormwater management lake. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. This rezoning will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions in the neighborhood. Existing boundaries were not illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions in the neighborhood. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Changing conditions do not make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary; however changing conditions do make the proposed amendment desirable and appropriate. Market conditions at the present time make it feasible to allow for viable multi -family residential development and while continuing to provide senior housing. HA2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\3rd ResubmittakRezone Criteria (rev 2-3-2023).doex 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The development standards proposed ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The site will be designed to meet all County and SFWMD requirements. No drainage problems will be created. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development standards and perimeter landscape buffers assure the proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUD7\3rd ResubmittaMezone Criteria (rev 2-3-2023).docx The existing zoning does not allow for the proposed density, which will further meet and address, to a significantly greater degree, the County's housing needs. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance; however, the AG zoning does not result in the highest and best use of the property. The site is designated Urban Residential Subdistrict, and there are sufficient public facilities to support the proposed intensity and residential density. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use; however, the proposed development is the highest and best use of this property as it is within urban Collier County, adjacent to residential development and property with existing zoning that permits multi -family residential, and there are sufficient public facilities to serve the site. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification is typical of and not different from any other similar development in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, Art. II, as amended.] There is availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to serve the project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC. HA2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\3rd Resubm i ttal \Rezone Criteria (rev 2-3-2023).docx THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) DEVIATIONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD DEVIATIONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS Deviation 1 (Group Housing) seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1, Group Housing, which states the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for ALF/Group Housing shall not exceed 0.45, to instead allow for a maximum FAR of 0.65. Justification: The LDC Limits the FAR for ALFs to 0.45, however, on numerous occasions, through the PUD process, a deviation has been granted to allow higher ALF typically of 0.60, but on occasion higher than that. The Carlisle was approved through a Conditional Use (CU-96-405). At that time the Zoning Ordnance did not include an FAR for ALFs as the means of regulating intensity for ALFs, and none was applied to the Carlisle. As part of our submittal, we are adding +/-10 acres of additional land to the 17.78-acre existing Carlisle site, and then establishing two development tracts. TractA (13.21 acres) contains the existing Carlisle facilities and Tract B (14.57Acres) will be the location of the multi family apartments, as well as a shared entry (from Airport) and additional parking to support the Carlisle (as they are currently leasing apportion of the Italian American Club for employee parking). Specirc of the FAR Deviation Request The Carlisle is 371,133 s f. in total building area. The current parcel (I Z 78 acres) is 774,496.80 total square feet in size (17.78 x 43,560). Applying the LDC maximum 0.45 FAR for an ALFyields a maximum square footage allowed of 348,523.56 square feet. The Carlisle, at 371,133 gross sf., exceeds the maximum LDC allowable FAR of 0.45 (348,523.56 square feet) by 22,609.44 sf. The Carlisle is deemed to be legal nonconforming in this respect. Using the proposed 13.21-acre size for the Carlisle (Tract A) yields a total square footage of 575,427.60 sf. Applying the requested 0.65 FAR yields a maximum gross building area of 374,027.94. The gross floor area of the Carlisle is 371,133 sf., which is a FAR of 0.645. If approved, the requested rezoning will rescind the approved Conditional Use permitting the Carlisle Naples, the existing ALF on Tract A. A maximum FAR of 0.65 will allow for the existing Carlisle Naples to continue operations. The FAR use will be limited to Tract A. The MPUD limits Tract B to multi family residential. Deviation 2 (Buffer Requirements) seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 — Buffer Requirements, Table 2.4, which requires a 15' wide, Type B perimeter landscape buffer where the proposed multi -family development is adjacent to commercial uses to instead allow for an enhanced, 10' foot wide Type A perimeter landscape buffer. Page 1 of 2 HA2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\3rd Resubmittal\Deviations and Justifications (rev 2-3-2023).docx Justification: This deviation applies to the northern portion of Tract B. The parcel to the north of Tract B is vacant and zoned Agricultural, however, the property is used by the adjacent Italian American Club for overflow parking. The overflow parking is considered a commercial use, necessitating the Type B landscape buffer requirement when typically, a Type A perimeter buffer would be required (multifamily residential is adjacent to a vacant, agriculturally zoned property). Moreover, this parcel will most likely be used for commercial purposes in the future. The portion of Tract B adjacent to the AG parcel will be developed with an access road, parking, and entrance features (such a fountains, a gatehouse, landscaping, etc.). The proposed Type A buffer will be enhanced with shrubs a minimum of ten gallons in size, four feet in height, spaced a maximum of four feet on center at the time ofplanting. The enhanced buffer will provide attractive, appropriate landscaping and will not result in a negative impact to the surrounding area. Page 2 of 2 H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\3rd Resubmittal\Deviations and Justifications (rev 2-3-2023).docx THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) BOUNDARY SURVEYS ------------ oin Iu:'a �,,- CARLISLE SRG CN FL, LLC THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) MASTER PLAN ONLY (ExiaBng, CeBisla use only) �Wytn OK N ZONING PUD (SUNSHINE VILLAGE) USE: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LAKE ZONING RSF-1 USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONINGA —� USE: COLLIER COUNtt LIBRARY HEADQUARTERS BRANCH ORANGE BLOSSOM DRNE I _= ZONING CPUD (ITALIAN v I ,,,,.,.m - _= AMERICAN CLUBHOUSE) USE ITALIAN AMERICAN I A CLUB NAPLES I � o.a FPeLESMro.a. z4sl, Po.aaz � _ I ZONING PUD I (LONGVIEW CENTER) c I USE: RETAIL NURSERY ZONINGA I I"I USE UNDEVELOPED I o \'LBE ENHANCED I G.R.2414.PG. tsw]_ 1 G.fta3ae.PG. rz2a4 to.v TEmP. sizes ZONING RPUO LoA sm Pc 14s1 I USE: SINGLE FAMILY REBIDENTIAL a^ LBE TRACT B TURrr 20'ttPE'D"LBE ONLY 'B'LBE M '.'A' LBE smT. G.ft. rzeTo. Po tt. PnaCELeos(al I MPuo susolsrRlcr ADJACENFTI AOOJACEMTO TYPE A JJACENT TO. CENT TO WHIN TRACT VITHIN TRACT 'ACE �DIRE0IPRO\ VEGETATION A REpUIREOII NI'TO LOC a'. 11TIGATE THE E. THE DEVEL 36 MULTFFAMILV DWELLING UNITS (EXISTING ALF): MAXIMUM FAR OF 0.66 ]UP HOUSINGI SEEKS RELIEF FROM MAXIMUM FAR OF O.fiS ZONING PUD lip oz28>O Pots PAacEL m66 DEVIATION 2(BUFFER REQUIREMENTS) SEEKS RELIEF ��_��-11! (LONE OAK) FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02-BUFFER REpUIREMENTS, III �-�-1 USE OFFICE TABLE 2.4, WHICH REpUIRESAIS'WIDE, TYPEB L ��"'/ I ERIMETER LANOBCAPE BUFFER WHERE THE PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IS ADJACENTTO 3565 �Ii gCBEEK COMMERCIAL USEB TO INSTEAD ALLOW FORA 10' FOOT i` B_ ��/ I WIDE TYPEA PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER BERNEEN tUD (BEAR CREEK)USE: I I THESE USES. FAMILY RESIDENTIAL �-INDICATEB LANOSGAPE BUFFER AREAS JRTH ®'° � EXHIBIT C ®" ••• �� � MASTER PLAN THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES FOLIO #'s 00238040007 & 00238240001 NAPLEs, FLORIDA 34109 Prepared by ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine &Environmental Consultine PHONE: 239-643-016G WWW.THANAPLES.COM Table of Contents 2 Exie-g Conditions Pr— 2.1 FLUCFCS Codes and E 2.2 Vegetation Association 2.2.1 Multi-Famil} 2.2.2 190 -Open Land - 2.2.3 422 -Brazilian PeI 2.2.4 427E2 Live Oak (E. 2.2.5 437 Australian Pin 2.1.6 111 E1-1 Acacia 22.7 513 -Ditch - 0.40 / 22.8 520-Lake-1.99F 2.2.11 814 - Roadway an 2.3 Wetlands &Other Surf 2.3.1 Wetland Seasonal 2.3.2 Jurisdictional Stab 2.4 Listed Plant and — 2.5 Historical / Archaeology, 2.6 Soils ............................... 2.6.1 3 - Malabar Fine S 2.6.2 20 - Ft. Drum and 2.6.3 32 -Urban Land.. 3 Proposed Conditions (Post 3.1 Proposed Project......... 32 Project Summary 3.3 Impacts to Wetlands _. 3.3.1 Direct; Permanent 3.3.2 Temporary Impac 3.3.3 Secondary Impact 3.3.4 Cumulative Impac 3.4 Minimization of Impac 3.5 Project Impacts to Lind 3.6 Project Impacts to Hist ve l.p.......................................................................................... 2 abitatDescriptions............................................................................2 :....................................... --........... ...................... ................ ...............3 Residential (high density) -13.10 Acres.......................................3 1.. Acres...........................................................................................3 per-1.62 Acres.................................................................................3 <otics "-"" -1.55 Acres............................................................3 A.....................................................................................4 Acres........................................................................................4 .cres...................................................................................................... 5 ...................................................................................................... 5 3 Sidewalk - 0.91................................................................................5 aceWaters...........................................................................................5 High -Water Table & Hydroperiod..................................................6 is of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters ...................................... 6 dSpecies.............................................................................................6 ;ical Resources....................................................................................7 .............................................................................................................. 7 md....................................................................................................... 7 Malabar, High, Fine Sands...............................................................9 ............................................................................................................10 -Development).................................................................................11 ............................................................................................................11 Impacts.............................................................................................11 s..........................................................................................................11 to Wetlands and Water Resources .. ...............11 is to Wetlands and Water Resources ............................................ 12 ts......................................................................................................... 12 �d Species........................................................................................... 12 ,rical / Archaeological Resources ................................................. 19 3.7 Native Habitat..........................................................................................................................14 3.8 Wellfield Protection.................................................................................................................14 4 Wetland Mitigation Program........................................................................................................15 4.1 Mitigation Summary................................................................................................................15 Appendix A: Exhibits Appendix B: Listed Species Survey The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL 1 INTRODUCTION The properties consist of approximately 27.94 acres in Collier County. The project is located immediately to the west of Airport Road and approximately 1.25 miles north of Pine Ridge Road. The northeast third of the proposed project will occur on. an existing developed parcel that contains stormwater facilities and an access road into an existing residential community. The properties are bordered to the south by multi -family residences, and to the west by a pond and single-family residence. The remaining two thirds of the project site is a former agricultural property that has been fallow for more than 30 years and has recolonized with predominately exotic vegetation. The properties can be identified by folio #'s 00238040007 and 00238240001. There have been no prior federal or state environmental permits authorized for this property that we are aware of. The proposed development includes the construction of an apartment complex. The apartments will vary from 1-bedroom to 3-bedroom units. The proposed project will consist of multiple multifamily residential buildings along with additional residential improvements and infrastructure. It will be developed in association with the existing Carlisle development which makes up approximately 13.10 of the project's 27.94 acres. This document provides information concerning the proposed The Groves project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It will be submitted to Collier County in support of a local development order made by the applicant. It will also be submitted to the South Florida Water Management District in support of an Environmental Resource Permit request. `The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PRE -DEVELOPMENT 2.1 FLUCFCS CODES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown in Table 1 below and Exhibit 2 (FLUCFCS Map). The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual was used to classify all of the vegetative communities occurring within the site boundaries. The attached FLUCFCS exhibit on Sheet 2 shows the subject property, its vegetative cover, and depicts the approximate limits of the wetland and upland areas. A general description is provided below in Table 1 along with any site -specific nuances that may be relevant to the assessment. Table 1: FLUCFCS code and description of commuiui e found within theproject site FLUCCS DESCRIPTION Upland Acres Wetland / OSW Acres 134 Multifamily Residential (high density) 1.3.10 190 Open Land 1.84 422 Brazilian Pepper 1.62 427E2 Live Oak (Exotics 25% to 50%) 1.55 437 Australian Pines 0.15 439 Other Hardwoods (Earleaf Acacia) 6.38 513 Ditch 0.40 520 Lake 1.99 814 Roadway and Sidewalk 0.91 Sub Totals 25.55 2.39 Total 27.94 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL 2.2 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS 2.2.1 134 — Multi -Family Residential (high density) —13.10 Acres The developed portion of the site is composed of residential building with associated roads, parking, and recreational facilities. The entire area has been disturbed due to prior development and the only vegetation present is landscaping material scattered along the perimeter and around the building and parking areas. This portion of the project area will remain relatively undisturbed except for minor parking and stormwater management improvements. 2.2.2 190 — Open Land — 1.84 Acres The open land community is bordered by two manmade lakes, roads, and sidewalks. The entire area has been disturbed due to prior development. 2.2.3 422 — Brazilian Pepper —1.62 Acres The Brazilian pepper community is an upland community of these small, shrub -like trees that are often established along borrow -pits, levees, dikes, and in old, disturbed fields. Brazilian Pepper is an aggressive invader of Florida's plant communities. A list of species observed in the Brazilian Pepper community can be found below in Table 2. This habitat was located along the eastern portion of the project site immediately adjacent to Airport Road. This may have been a lower hydric area in the past but exhibited no hydric indicators at the time of the field investigations for this report. Table 2: Ve etation observed within the Brazilian Pepper community on -site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata/ Substrata Wetland Status Est. % Coverage Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M, G FAC 5 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M FAC 80 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M FAC 5 Carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides G FAC 2 C = Canopy M = Mid -story G = Groundcover V = Vine OBL = Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPL = Upland 2.2.4 427E2 Live Oak (Exotics 25 % -50%) — 1.55 Acres The live oak community is an upland temperate hammock, this forest community is one in which live oak is either pure or predominant. The principal associates of this cover type include sweetgum, magnolia, holly, and laurel oak. This area does qualify as native habitat under the Collier County Land Development Code and preserve requirements for the project will be based The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL on this habitat acreage. This habitat was located mostly central to the project site on a slightly elevated portion of the property. Table 3_ Vevetation observed within the Live Oaks (Exotic 25 %-50 %) community on -site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata/ Substrata Wetland Status Est. % Coverage Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M FAC 30 Live oak Quercus virginiana C UPL 50 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C FAC 1.0 Carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides M, G FAC 5 Java plum Syzygiunz cumini C FAC 5 C = Canopy M = Mid -story G = Groundcover V = Vine OBL = Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPL = Upland 2.2.5 437 Australian Pines - 0.15 Acres The Australian pine community is an upland community common on disturbed sites, forming dense thickets, and is frequently planted as wind breaks and soil stabilizers. Contrary to its name, Australian pine is a hardwood. This species exhibits needle -like leaves and a characteristic cone shaped crown structure. This habitat was located at the south edge of the project site adjacent to the lake to the south. TahlP 4• Veoetatinn 0hser7)ed Mifhin thn Australian Pines rnmmunitil on -site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata/ Substrata Wetland Status Est. % Coverage Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia C FAC 100 C = Canopy M = Mid -story G = Groun.dcover V = Vine OBL = Obligate Welland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPL = Upland 2.2.6 439 Earleaf Acacia - 6.38 Acres The Other Hardwoods community is a disturbed upland community in which earleaf acacia is the dominant species observed. Ground cover is limited due to the dense canopy and thick duff layer of leaves found on the ground. The habitat comprises the majority of the project area throughout the southern two thirds of the project site. TAhlP 5• llvavtatin" nhsvr7)Pri vnthin the Farleaf Araria rnmmunitu on -site - Common Name Scientific Name Strata/ Substrata Wetland Status Est. % Coverage Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M FAC 80 Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C, M FAC 5 Coco plum Chrysobalanus icaco M FACW 10 Date palm Phoenix spp 4 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL Cabba e alm Sabal palmetto C FAC 15 Carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides M, G FAC 5 Blue mistflower Conoclinium coelestinum M, G FAC 5 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M FAC 25 C = Canopy M = Mid -story G = Groundcover V = Vine OBL = Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPL = Upland 2.2.7 51.3 - Ditch - 0.40 Acres There are two existing ditches within the property boundaries which appear to be a part of the prior agricultural use of the site. The ditches have transitioned to disturbed communities but do not appear to hold water for any extended period of time. They were dry at the time of the field investigations. 'Table 5- Vnavtatinn nh.svr77vd mithin the Ditch rnmmunittl nn-,Site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata/ Substrata Wetland Status Est. % Coverage Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M FAC 50 Coco plum Chrysobalanus icaco M FACW 5 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C FAC 20 Carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides M, G FAC 5 Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia G FAC 10 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M FAC 15 C = Canopy M = Mid -story G = Groundcover V = Vine OBL = Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPI, = Upland 2.2.8 520 - Lake - 1.99 Acres There are two existing manmade lakes encompassing the northeast portion of the parcel. The two lakes account for 1.99 acres. 2.2.9 814 - Roadway and Sidewalk - 0.91 There are existing roadways and sidewalks located on the property that will undergo construction activities and improvements. 2.3 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified THA staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the FDEP and the State 404 Program (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) were followed in determining whether an area could be considered a wetland or 5 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. The wetlands definitions in Chapter 62-340.200(19), F.A.C. and 33CFR 328.3 state that wetlands are those areas "inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils." The methodologies used to delineate a wetland boundary as described in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. use a series of tests in order to determine the presence of a wetland. In order to be considered a wetland, a property must have two of three of the following characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators. These characteristics are defined in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Since the FDEP assumed portions of the federal 404 permitting program, any wetlands that are determined to be jurisdictional to the state are also considered jurisdictional under the 404 program unless the applicant can prove to FDEP's satisfaction that they are not. 2.3.1 Wetland Seasonal High -Water Table & Hydroperiod There was no indication of surficial water anywhere on the project site except for within the three stormwater ponds on the northern parcel. The ditches had no water marks and also had evidence of burrowing animals (armadillo and rabbit) which would not have been present if the ditches were regularly inundated. 2.3.2 jurisdictional Status of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters The wetland or other surface water boundaries established are assumed to be jurisdictional with the State permitting agency per their delineation guidelines. The wetland delineation is shown on the attached FLUCFCS exhibits. As depicted, the proposed project is in upland habitats aside from the ditches and manmade lakes. No jurisdictional wetlands were present on the site. 2.4 LISTED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted within the project area by THA biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Appendix A. The Threatened & Endangered Species report describes the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project area during the course of the referenced survey. A few listed animal species, in addition to those documented, have the potential to occur in certain habitats present on -site. These species include but are not limited to the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus), Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus), and red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). The probability of these I The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL animals utilizing suitable habitats ranges from moderate to very low depending on the particular species. It is improbable that any of these species currently reside or nest on -site. The surrounding developments and major roadway adjacent to the site affect animal movement to the point that the site offers only minimal value to local transient wildlife (mainly birds). The surrounding development and roadways have isolated this property and made travel to it by terrestrial wildlife difficult. Additionally, the dense infestation by invasive vegetation has also depressed the value of the property as viable wildlife habitat. 2.5 HISTORICAL/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES There were no known historical or archaeological resources located on -site. Given that the entire property has been impacted in the past by agricultural activities and development, it is unlikely that any archaeological or historical resource is present. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 2.6 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS,1998) there are three (3) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. One of the types of soil found on the property is hydric. The attached exhibit provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub- sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information from the Collier County Soils Survey is provided below about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it's typical location in the landscape on a county -wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: 2.6.1 3 — Malabar Fine Sand This nearly level, poorly drained soil is in sloughs and poorly defined drainage ways. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 10 to 250 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is dark gray fine sand about 2 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 15 inches. The subsoil extends to a depth of about 72 inches; the upper part is brownish yellow and yellow fine sand, the middle part is very pale brown and light gray fine sand, the lower part is grayish brown, mottled, sand clay loam. The substratum is light gray fine sand with 10 percent shell fragments to a depth of about 80 inches. 7 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL In 95 percent of areas mapped as Malabar fine sand, Malabar soil and soils of similar characteristics make up 75 to 99 percent of the map unit. The characteristics of Pineda and Riviera soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this map unit are small areas of Basinger, Boca and Oldsmar soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about l to 25 percent of the unit. The permeability of this soil is slow to very slow. The available water capacity is low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high-water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 3 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 12 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow moving water for periods of about 7 to 30 days. Natural vegetation consists of scattered south Florida slashpine, cypress, cabbage palm, sawpalmetto, waxmyrtle, pineland threeawn and chalky bluestem. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and doughtiness. With good water -control measures and soil -improving measures, the soil can be made suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet seasons and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, the soil is moderately suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to planting provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high-water table. A good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or grass -clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular application of fertilizers and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. This soil is well suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, chalky bluestem and bluejoint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Malabar soil is in the Slough range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of the high-water table. To overcome this limitation, building sites and septic tank absorption fields should be mounded. This soil also has severe limitation for recreational development because of wetness and sand texture. Problems associated with wetness can be corrected by providing adequate drainage and drainage outlets to control the high-water table. The sandy texture limitation can be overcome by adding suitable topsoil or by resurfacing the area. This Malabar soil is in capability subclass IVw. The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL 2.6.2 20 — Ft. Drum and Malabar, High, Fine Sands These nearly level, poorly drained soils are on ridges boarding sloughs. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and ranges from 10 to 200 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the Ft. Drum soil has a surface layer of very dark grayish brown fine sand about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is fine sand to a depth of about 20 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray, and the lower part is light gray. The substratum is fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches; the upper part is brownish yellow; the middle part is white and the lower part is brown. "Typically, the Malabar high soil has a surface of dark gray fine sand about 2 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 15 inches. The subsoil extends to a depth of about 72 inches; the upper part is brownish yellow and yellow fine sand, the middle part is very pale brown and light gray fine sand, the lower part is grayish brown, mottled, sandy clay loam. The substratum is light gray fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Areas mapped can consist entirely of Ft. Drum soil, Malabar soil, or any combination of the two soils. The two soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs and soils characteristics. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this unit are small areas of Basinger, Holopaw and Pineda soil on slough landscape positions. These soils make up about 0 to 18 percent of the unit. The permeability of the Ft. Drum soil is rapid. The permeability of the Malabar soil is slow. The available water capacity of these soils is low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high-water table is between 6 to 18 inches of the surface for I to 6 months. In other months; the water table is below 18 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Rarely is it above the surface. Natural vegetation consists mostly of south Florida slash pine, saw palmetto, live oak, cabbage palm, wax myrtle, chalky bluestem, creeping bluestem, low panicum and pincland threeawn. These soils are poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and doughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are followed. With good water control and soil improving measures, these soils can be made suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet seasons and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry season. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, these soils are well suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to planting provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high-water table. A good grass over crop between the trees helps to protect the soils from blowing when the trees are young. With good water control management, these soils are well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL panglograss, bahiagrass, and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or grass -clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizers and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. These soils are moderately suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage is creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn and chalky bluestem. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. The Ft. Drum and Malabar soils are in the Flatwoods range site. These soils arc moderately suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage is creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn and chalky bluestem. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. The Ft. Drum and Malabar soils are in the Flatwoods range site. These soils have severe limitations for most urban uses because of wetness. if these soils are used as septic tank absorption fields, they should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high-water table. For recreational uses, these soils also have severe limitations because of wetness, but with proper drainage to remove excess surface water during wet periods, many of these limitations can be overcome. Ft. Drum and Malabar soils are in capability subclass 1Vw. 2.6.3 32 — Urban Land Urban land consists of areas that are 75 percent or more covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, shopping -centers, highways, industrial areas, airports, and other urban structures. Small areas of undisturbed soils are mostly lawns, vacant lots, playgrounds, and green areas. The original soil in some areas have been altered by filling, grading, and shaping. Urban land is nearly level except for some parking areas that are sloped to drain off water. Individual areas are usually rectangular in shape and range from 10 to 1200 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Soils included in this unit are small areas of Boca, Hallandale, lmmokalee and Myakka soils with less than 1.2 inches of fill material spread over the surface. These soils make up about 25 percent or less of the unit. The depth of the water table varies with the amount of fill material and the extent of artificial drainage within any mapped area. Urban land will remain in its present use; therefore, no other uses are rated. This map unit has not been assigned a capability class 10 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL 3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS POST-DFVELOPMENT) 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project will impact two existing manmade lakes and two ditches located on site. None of these impact areas are natural wetlands. The ditches have been disturbed due to prior agricultural activities and while they may hold some water in high rainfall conditions, they do not appear to hold water for any extended periods. The communities mentioned above are isolated from any other wetlands or other surface waters and have been created as a result of anthropogenic activities. The remaining project area is uplands, which accounts for approximately 91 percent of the project site. 3.2 PROJECT SUMMARY "The 27.94-acre site consists of 25.55 acres of uplands and 2.39 acres of other surface waters. There are no natural wetland areas present. All vegetated areas on site have been impacted either by nuisance and exotic vegetation, or as a result of past disturbances, clearing, and surrounding development. The ditches that bisect the property contain no surface waters and very minimal to no evidence of prolonged hydrology. The ditches appear to be old agricultural ditches that have been recolonized by invasive and nuisance vegetation. The proposed project is the construction of an apartment complex and associated activities including road improvements and parking. The proposed project will impact 2.39 acres of other surface waters during construction activities (See Sheet 5 of the environmental figures). 3.3 IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 3.3.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Development of the proposed project will not impact any natural wetland areas. The impacts to the other surface waters will be compensated for through the construction of other surface water features that will serve the new proposed project. No loss of wetland habitat will result from the proposed project 3.3.2 Temporary Impacts No temporary impacts are expected with this development. There are no adjacent or on -site natural wetland habitats present that could be impacted by the project. 3.3.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources Prior to construction commencement all construction areas will be enclosed with siltation - prevention devices, which will remain in place until the construction is completed. This will 11 'The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL prevent flow of turbid waters off of the project site. 'There are no adjacent or on -site wetlands to be impacted, so protections will be put in place to protect adjacent waters and storm water features from siltation. 3.3.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources There will be no wetland impacts associated with the project so no cumulative impact within the basin or surrounding areas. 3.4 MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS As outlined in Section 10.2.1..2 of the ERP Applicant's Handbook (vol 1), "The Agency will not require the applicant to implement practicable design modifications to reduce or eliminate impacts when: a. The ecological value of the functions provided by the area of wetland or other surface water to be adversely affected is low, based on a site -specific analysis using the factors in section 10.2.2.3, below, and the proposed mitigation will provide greater long term ecological value than the area of wetland or other surface water to be adversely affected, or b. The applicant proposes mitigation that implements all or part of a plan that provides regional ecological value and that provides greater long term ecological value than the area of wetland or other surface water to be adversely affected." As stated above, there are no wetland impacts associated with the proposed project. Impacts to other surface water areas will be replaced through the construction of a new stormwater management system for the proposed project. 3.5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was originally conducted on the project site by THA biologists on May 24, 2022. Several listed animal species, in addition to those documented, have the potential to occur in certain habitats present on -site. These species include but are not limited to the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus), Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus), and red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. The following subsections provide an assessment of the proposed project's potential impacts to various listed animal species. The species addressed include those observed on or in close proximity to the subject property as well as certain species that could potentially occur on the site or on nearby off -site parcels. 12 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus There are no suitable nesting or roosting trees located on -site. The eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act but instead under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No impacts to bald eagles will result from the proposed project. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) No gopher tortoises were observed during the initial site survey. One potential gopher tortoise burrow was identified but had been collapsed for some time so was not occupied. The dense exotic canopy and root systems throughout the majority of the project area does not provide suitable habitat for gopher tortoises. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corals couperi) No eastern indigo snakes have been observed on -site, and the majority of the project area does not provide much in the way of suitable habitat for indigo snakes. There were several armadillo burrows located which could provide an underground refuge for indigo snakes but there is very little habitat support in terms of foraging potential. Considering their elusive nature, large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that indigo snakes could occasionally occupy portions of the project area though the intervening roads and developments make this possibility unlikely. The contractors on -site will be made aware of and will be required to follow the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake developed by the USFWS. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumovs floridanus The Florida bonneted bat utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for roosting and foraging. No cavities or other potential roosting sites were located within the proposed development areas that would be suitable for bonneted bat roosting. No adverse effect to the bonneted bat is expected Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel has not been observed on -site; however, they have been known to utilize habitats such as cypress, cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and pine flatwoods. Additionally, they are often found in suburban habitats including golf courses, and residential park areas. The area surrounding the project site is primarily commercial and residential development. There are no suitable preferred habitats on -site either so the likelihood of fox squirrels being present on the site are minimal. Little to no effect to the Big Cypress fox squirrel is expected. Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Red -cockaded woodpeckers were not observed during the initial site survey. The red -cockaded woodpecker utilizes southern slash pine flatwoods as nesting and foraging habitat in south 13 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL Florida. There are no pine trees on the property that would provide nesting or foraging opportunities so no adverse effect to the red -cockaded woodpecker is expected. 3.6 PROJECT IMPACTS TO HISTORICAL/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES There are no known historical or archaeological resources located within the vicinity of the project. 3.7 NATIVE HABITAT The Collier County Land Development Code requires preservation of a percentage of existing native habitat on all new project proposals. The percentage of preserve required depends on the location of the project within the County, and the extent of existing native habitat that exists on the property. For this project, the preserve requirement is 25% of the native habitat. The Live oak community is the only habitat on the site that meets the County definition of native. The live oak habitat is approximately 1.55 acres in size so will be required to preserve at least 0.39 acre of habitat somewhere on the site. Prior to final approvals, it is required that this preserve area and protective measures must be identified on the site plans. 3.8 WELLFIELD PROTECTION The project is located within the wellfield protection zone W-4 for the Naples Coastal Ridge Wellfield. Collier County Land Development Code (3.06) requires protections of these wellfield areas. As a residential project, there should not be any generation or storage of large quantities of hazardous products or hazardous waste. The project will be compliant with all South Florida Water Management District requirements related to the stormwater management on the project site and as such, should be consistent with the County protection requirements as well. 14 The Haven at North Naples Environmental Supplement Naples, FL 4 WETLAND MITIGATION PROGRAM There is no mitigation requirement as the only impacts will be to surface water areas within the manmade lakes. The ditches do not contain any surface water indicators and will likewise not require any wetland mitigation. 4.1 MITIGATION SUMMARY The proposed development will impact 2.29 acres of surface waters. There are no temporary, secondary, or cumulative impacts associated with this project. No wetland mitigation will be required. 15 STATE OF F—RIDA COLLIER COUNTY VICINITY MAP unnioe rvnriss. vi anus ��oucrtuoe: wai.nosa� COUNTY AERIAL �c�azes, i¢c.HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES LOCATION MAP � � t9p -190 —. Y f� '—w�awlalnal 51] 1 d22 2 dUl L�,� 51� � 623 y 43] 4- "{ ke. �. 5, r 32 m; r< ww �.Ls X I V ' M �, 3� � ��� y '� �7 �� i tt ©® 32 1 7 �1: - 6 ® .. - N ............... F 0 HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES SITEPLAN rnaMlles - GOLDEN GATE SUBJECT PROPERTY is - WELLFIELD ,, ins-a� � Rn• 9 a 2F tt COASTAL RIDGE i VJ� WELLFIFI.D ieT GOLDEN GATE CITY WELLFIELD Legend — O POLLVTION CONTROL WELLFIELOG - ��i „rell, Hall B Assaioteil "�- „lL� Moeine6 Fmlmnmenld(unsuquig JOHNSON DEV-AIRPORT RD WEI,LF�i.D MAP NT6FOP-695 RAN6E•25E THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS & LISTED SPECIES SURVEY The Haven at North Naples: VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS (FLUCFCS) AND LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Prepared By: T L, HALL ASSOCSOC IATES, INC.. 1 Marine Rc Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 Updated August 2022 The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 1. INTRODUCTION Johnson Development (applicant) seeks to develop an apartment complex west of Airport Rd that will be associated with the existing Carlisle community. The proposed project is a multi -family residential development with associated amenities and infrastructure. There have been no prior federal or state environmental permits authorized for the undeveloped portion of the proposed project. Permits have been issued for the existing development. The project will be required to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as well go under review for Collier County approvals that would allow for construction to start. The properties consist of approximately 27.94 acres in Collier County. The project is located immediately to the west of Airport Road and approximately 1.25 miles north of Pine Ridge Road. The northeast third of the proposed project will occur on an existing developed parcel that contains stormwater facilities and an access road into an existing residential community. The properties are bordered to the south by multi -family residences, and to the west by a pond and single-family residence. The remaining two thirds of the project site is a former agricultural property that has been fallow for more than 30 years and has recolonized with predominately exotic vegetation. The properties can be identified by folio #'s 00238040007 and 00238240001. This report documents the results of the habitat mapping and listed species/wildlife surveys conducted by Turrell, Hall and Associates (THA). In reviewing this report, the reader should refer to the various Figures attached to this report. The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 2. EXISTING VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS, LAND FORMS, & LAND USES (FLUCFCS) 2.1 METHODOLO These observations were recorded during the meandering pedestrian transects across the lands documenting vegetation community characteristics as well as recording location points where any listed species observations were made. The methods and class descriptions found in the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual (FDOT, 1999) were generally followed when delineating areas and assigning areas to an appropriate FLUCFCS category (class) or "code". Level III classifications were generally employed. Certain modifications and/or additions were made to the FLUCFCS class definitions and numeric codes presented in this manual in order to better describe and differentiate both plant communities and land uses. Since an emphasis was placed on plant communities and the type and quality of habitats formed by these communities, the vegetation association present was given more weight than the prevailing land use in some cases. The sections that follow list and describe the FLUCFCS categories mapped within the project lands and in other adjacent lands. Major FLUCFCS categories are presented first. The FLUCFCS code number for each category is indicated followed by the brief name (description) of the category. Alphabet modifiers have also been added to differentiate the different polygons that have the same FLUCFCS codes. If applicable, plants common to each significant vegetation stratum present are indicated. A general description of the FLUCFCS category is then provided together with any nuances specific to the project site that are worthy of mention. Following the major categories, additional FLUCFCS category modifiers may also be included. For example, the major FLUCFCS category of 411 (pine flatwoods) might be modified by using the suffix code "E4". In this example, a FLUCFCS E4 would indicate a pine flatwoods which has exotic plants present which form a cover ranging from 75 to 100 percent (the "E4" modifier). Modifiers are used when the effects of disturbance or exotic species have significantly altered common characteristics of a major FLUCFCS class. One should note that the standard FLUCFCS system labels certain groups of vegetation associations (FLUCFCS categories) as "uplands" and others as "wetlands". In assigning FLUCFCS categories, THA uses the FLUCFCS category which best describes the dominant vegetation association, generally without regard to whether the FLUCFCS system considers the community as an "upland" or "wetland". 2.2 MATOR FLUCFCS CATEGORIES Figure 2 illustrates the FLUCFCS map polygons present on the project lands. A FLUCFCS map unit is a unique area (or polygon) mapped using either a major FLUCFCS category code only (ex., FLUCFCS 621), a major FLUCFCS category code together with a unique identifier (ex., FLUCFCS 621(A)), or a major FLUCFCS category code together with one or more modifiers (ex., FLUCFCS 621 E2). Table 1 lists each of the FLUCFCS map unit codes present on the property and total acreage encompassed by each unique FLUCFCS type. The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 In certain instances, the most appropriate major FLUCFCS code to assign to an area may be a code that generally implies the area is an upland or otherwise does not seem to indicate the area may be a wetland. There are cases where the particular area may indeed classify as a wetland, however. When this occurs and there is no proper existing wetland FLUCFCS code available, the best fitting FLUCFCS code is assigned but is also given a suffix of "H" indicating hydric conditions are present and the area likely classifies as a wetland. For example, there can be actively managed areas within larger fallow fields (FLUCFCS 216) that are depressions. Some of these depressions can have wetland characteristics and may have several wetland plant species present. Such depressions would be mapped as FLUCFCS 216 H indicating these areas are part of a fallow field but have hydric characteristics. Table 1. Existing FLUCFCS categories present on the Airport Road property. FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Description Acres % of Total Property 134 Multi -Family Residential 9high density) 13.10 46.9 190 Open Land 1.84 6.6 422 Brazilian Pepper 1.62 5.8 427E2 Live Oak (Exotics 25% to 50%) 1.55 5.5 437 Australian Pines 0.15 0.5 439 Earleaf Acacia 6.38 22.8 513 Ditch 0.40 1.5 520 Lake 1.99 7.1 814 Roadway and Sidewalk 0.91 3.3 TOTAL ACRES 27.94 Of the total 27.94 acres contained within the property boundary, 91.4% classify as uplands (25.55 ac.) and 8.6% classify as surface waters (2.39 ac.). There are no wetlands present on the site. The following sub -sections describe each major FLUCFCS category mapped on the project lands. Modifiers attached to these categories are described separately. One should read both the major FLUCFCS categories and their modifiers to understand the FLUCFCS map units present. 134: Multi -family Residential-13.10Acres Comments: This area has undergone past clearing and construction activities and is currently developed as an existing residential complex. 190: Open Land -1.84 Acres Comments: This area has undergone past clearing and construction activities and surrounds the stormwater ponds and access drive into the existing residential complex. 422 Brazilian Pepper -1.62 Acres Canopy - Brazilian pepper, earleaf acacia, cabbage palm, Laurel oak, and java plum Subcanopy - earleaf acacia, Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 Ground Cover - sword fern, carrotwood Comments: The Brazilian pepper community is an upland community of these small, shrub -like trees that are often established along borrow -pits, levees, dikes, and in old, disturbed fields. Brazilian Pepper is an aggressive invader of Florida's plant communities. 427E2: Live Oak (Exotics 25% to 50%) -1.55 acres Canopy -earleaf acacia, cabbage palm, live oak, java plum Subcanopy - earleaf acacia and carrotwood Comments: The canopy and midstory are comprised of earleaf acacia, live oak, and cabbage palm. Exotics exceed 25 percent. With the dense layer of leaves found in the canopy, limited ground coverage is present. 437. Australian Pines -0.15 Acres Canopy - Australian pine Comments: The Australian pine community is an upland community common on disturbed sites, forming dense thickets, and is frequently planted as wind breaks and soil stabilizers. The plant exhibits allelopathic qualities which limits groundcover. 439: Earleaf Acacia - 6.38 Acres Canopy -earleaf acacia, cabbage palm, live oak, Brazilian pepper Subcanopy - earleaf acacia, coco plum, blue mistflower, and carrotwood Ground Cover - carrotwood, blue mistflower Comments: The canopy and midstory are primarily comprised of earleaf acacia and cabbage palm. With the dense layer of leaves found in the canopy, limited ground coverage is present. 513: Ditch - 0.40 Acres Canopy -earleaf acacia, cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper Subcanopy - earleaf acacia, Brazilian pepper, coco plum, blue mistflower, and carrotwood Ground Cover - carrotwood, blue mistflower Comments: The canopy and midstory are primarily comprised of earleaf acacia and cabbage palm. The ditches appear to be old agriculture ditches. The two ditches are isolated from other wetlands or other surface waters. 520: Lake-1.99 Acres Comments: There are two existing manmade lakes present on site that are found in the northeast portion of the proposed project area. 814: Roadway and Sidewalk- 0.91 Acres Comments: There are existing roadways and sidewalks present on site that were constructed for the retirement homes and miscellaneous residences found on the property. The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 3. LISTED SPECIES SURVEYS Wildlife and listed species surveys were conducted by THA on the project lands. As used herein, the term "listed animal species" refers to those animals listed as endangered or threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as well as those animal species listed as species of special concern by the FWC. The term "listed plant species" refers to those plants listed as endangered or threatened by the FWS. Several animal species listed by FWC are also classified (listed) by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as wetland dependent species. THA's wildlife/listed species surveys were supplemented by research concerning listed species. The following subsections document these efforts and the results of these efforts. 3.1 DATABASE RESEARCH Prior to field investigations, aerial photos, soils maps, and prior mapping for the Airport Rd. properties were reviewed to identify the various vegetation associations potentially present on and adjacent to project lands. Various publications and databases were reviewed to determine listed plant and wildlife species which could occur and those that had been previously documented on or near the project lands as well as to gather information concerning listed species (see listed references in Section 4). Based on the habitat types identified, existing knowledge of the project area, contacts with other consultants, and review of publications and databases, a preliminary list of listed plant and animal species with the potential to occur within or near the project lands was determined. 3.2 FIELD BIOTIC SURVEY METHODOLOGY A series of transects were walked to search for any evidence of listed species utilization of the proposed project. The field surveys consisted of biologists walking a series of meandering paths through the various habitats found on the project lands. The methodology follows that of the "Meandering Strip Census" survey as described in the Collier County approved methodologies. Space between transect lines was generally established at 100 feet apart in a north/south orientation. Observers were equipped with compass, aerials, wildlife and plant identification books and notes, binoculars, field notebooks, and hand-held GPS units. Between the transect lines, observers walk a meandering path crisscrossing the transect strip (See Exhibit 4). The frequency and distance between the meanders is determined by the density of the vegetation. Meanders are walked in an east/west pattern and in forested areas they are walked twice in opposite directions to aid in the search for tree cavities that could support Florida bonneted bat roosting. Along the transects, the biologists periodically stopped, looked for wildlife and signs of wildlife, looked for listed plant species in appropriate habitats, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The approximate location of observed listed wildlife and plant species and their numbers were mapped on aerials and recorded in field notebooks as were signs of listed wildlife species that were noted. Any listed species sighting locations are also documented with the handheld GPS unit. In the same fashion, observed non -listed wildlife species encountered or signs of such species were also recorded. Tree cavities and nests observed within or adjacent to the project boundary were also documented with the The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 handheld GPS unit. The field survey methodologies utilized on the project lands were consistent with Collier County methodology and generally consistent with those prescribed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Table 2: Survev time Frames Survey Survey Total Survey Date Staff Weather Conditions Survey Time Period Man -Hours 05/24/2022 TH, MO Clear and Calm. Low 73' High 0700 -1000 6 Cloudy to overcast, Light rain. 06/09/2022 TH Low 79' High 85' 1600 - 1800 2 Cloudy. Heavy rain ended 07/07/2022 TH survey Low 76' High 93' 1500-1800 3 Total Survey Man -Hours 11 The surveys were performed by the following THA personnel: Tim Hall Education: B.S. in Forest Resources and Conservation, M.S. in Wildlife Ecology from University of Florida. Experience: 32 years as an environmental consultant with emphasis on listed species surveys and management plans, environmental impact analyses and assessments, wetland delineation, environmental permitting, and various other environmental topics. Megan O'Connor Education: B.S. in Environmental Science from Nova Southeastern University. Experience: 3 years as a professional environmental consultant with emphasis on ecological assessments, wildlife surveys, and environmental permitting. 2 2 RFgTTT Tq 3.3.1 Research Results The review conducted of the various existing databases concerning documented listed species (FWC, FWS, IPAC, FNAI) did not reveal records of any listed plant or animal species documented on the project lands. THA's review of these existing databases included searching records for documented listed species occurring within approximately 1,000 feet of the subject property boundary. There were no records of any listed plant species occurring in the query area. The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 3.3.2 Listed Animal Species Observed Several different animal species were observed during the course of THA's wildlife/listed species surveys. Various songbirds were observed during the site survey. Armadillo burrows were observed along the edges of the ditches. Table 3 provides a listing of all the wildlife (animal) species observed on the Airport Rd. properties during the course of THA's surveys. 3.3.3 Listed Animal Species Which Have the Potential to Occur but Were Not Observed Although not observed on the project lands during the listed species surveys, additional state and/or federally listed faunal species could potentially occur on the Airport Rd. properties or on lands adjacent to the property. Based on habitats present within these areas, land uses, species observed near the project during biotic surveys, habitats present in the general area, review of various sources of information previously, and personal experience of project biologists, assessments were made as to the probability of occurrence of other listed species on the project lands. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) (BCFS) is considered a threatened species by the FWC and is classified as a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. BCFS typically reside in pine flatwoods and mixed pine and cypress forests and prefer mature forests that are open and "park -like" (e.g., have a scattered subcanopy and a ground cover not dominated by woody species or vines). BCFS can also be found in melaleuca infested forests provided some desirable habitat remains in the general area and can also forage areas containing hardwoods such as oaks and cabbage palms. No BCFS were observed during the course of any of the on -site investigations. The habitat has been overrun with exotics to densities which make the site generally unsuitable for BCFS utilization. Additional survey efforts will be undertaken prior to any clearing work to ensure that no BCFS use is occurring on the site. There is a very limited possibility that BCFS may occasionally forage in semi -appropriate habitats. Florida Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridana) is listed as Endangered by FWS and FWC Bonneted bats roost in tree cavities, roof overhangs, bridges, rock crevices and other similar sites. The property was thoroughly inspected during the field surveys for any dead snags or cavities within trees on or adjacent to the site. No signs of current or past roosting activity were observed and no other evidence of bonneted bats was seen. Gopher Tortoise The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is listed as a Threatened Species by the FWC and as a candidate species by the FWS. A single collapsed (potential) gopher tortoise burrow was observed on the property, however, no additional evidence of gopher tortoises was observed on the Airport Rd. properties or on adjacent lands. Several other burrows were also observed but were determined to be armadillo burrows (one in use by a rabbit). Gopher tortoises prefer upland habitats, particularly xeric scrub communities and higher The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 elevation pine flatwoods. They can also be found in disturbed upland areas including fallow and abandoned agricultural fields, open urban lands, perimeters of active crop fields, and pastures. It is deemed unlikely that this species currently resides on the Airport Rd. properties as the majority of the site does not provide suitable habitat for gopher tortoises and is overrun with dense exotics and heavy surficial root systems. Eastern Indigo Snake The eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corgis couperi) is listed as Threatened by FWS and FWC. Generally, this species lives and hunts in a wide variety of habitats and its territory can cover large areas. They can be associated with gopher tortoise burrows (as a commensal) and favor pine flatwoods, palmetto prairies, and scrub habitats as well as wetland edges. They are relatively reclusive in nature and observations in the wild are rather rare. There is a low to moderate probability that one or more eastern indigo snakes may occasionally utilize different habitats present in the project lands. Indigo snakes could theoretically reside on the property; however, chances seem remote. Red -cockaded Woodpecker The red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) is listed as Endangered. Red -cockaded woodpeckers were not observed during the initial site survey. The red -cockaded woodpecker utilizes southern slash pine flatwoods as nesting and foraging habitat in south Florida. Red - cockaded woodpeckers have unique nesting behaviors and nest in self-made cavities in live pine trees. There were no pine trees located on the property and likewise no evidence of any RCW cavities or cavity construction in living pines was observed. Listed Wading Birds Various listed wading birds though not observed on -site could theoretically visit the pond shorelines within the project lands for foraging. Little blue herons (Egretta caerula) and tricolor herons (Egretta tricolor) are two species with a moderate probability of foraging along the stormwater pond shorelines. Such birds are opportunistic feeders and travel substantial distances to find potential foraging areas. It is unlikely that any of the mentioned species' nest on the Airport Rd. properties or on adjacent land as it is not suitable habitat. No impacts to any listed species are expected as a result of the project. 3.3.4 Listed Animal General Wildlife Observations During the biotic surveys conducted on the project lands, biologists recorded sightings and signs of non -listed wildlife in addition to listed species. Table 2 contains all wildlife observed on the project lands. No signs of larger mammals, such as bobcat, feral dog, and white-tailed deer, were observed on the Airport Rd. properties. Other mammal sign observed on the Airport Rd. properties included raccoon tracks and armadillo burrows along the ditches. Observations of non -listed bird species were widely scattered and low in number and were The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 particularly infrequent in the densest exotic areas. Although several species of non -listed birds are indicated in Table 5, the actual number of individuals and number of species observed during any given period of wildlife observations was typically low. 3.3.5 Listed Plant Species No listed plant species were observed on the project lands during the course of the listed species/wildlife surveys conducted and a review of pertinent databases concerning listed plant species found no records of such plants occurring on project lands or within 5,000 feet of these lands. Considering these points, it seems highly improbable that any plant species currently listed by FWS may be present on project lands. The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 4. REFERENCES Chafin, L.G. 2000. Field guide to the rare plants of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Deyrup, Mark and R. Franz (ed.). 1994. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume IV, invertebrates. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 1999. Florida land use, cover, and forms classification system. FDOT, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2014. Florida panther telemetry data, 2/23/1981 through 7/24/2014 - G1S database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida panther mortality data, 2/13/1972 through 12/31/2015 - G1S database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida black bear nuisance report data,1980 through 2014 - G1S database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida's waterbird colony locator. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http:// https:/ /www.arcgis.com/ apps/ mapviewer/index.html?webmap=5fl6b8ba3ffe4d01b7d2cdd3f 743f5b5 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2018. Florida's endangered species, threatened species, and species of special concern - official lists. FWC, Tallahassee, Florida. FWC. 2019. Species Conservation Measures and Permitting Guidelines. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/species-guidelines/ FWC. 2020. FWC bald eagle nesting activity; data for 2000 through 2017. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: https: / / geodata.myfwc.com/ datasets/ eb20bf44aeea44a8ab4a47cd4329c6b6_5/ explore Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFC). 1988. Wildlife methodology guidelines for section 18.1) of the Application for Development Approval. GFC, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2014. Species and natural communities tracking list for Collier County, Florida. FNAI, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http:/ /www.fi-iai.org/ trackinglist.cfm Gilbert, C.R. 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume II, fishes. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Hipes, D., D.R. Jackson, K. NeSmith, D. Printiss, and K. Brandt. 2000. Field guide to the rare animals The Haven at North Naples Listed Species Survey August 2022 of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Humphrey, Stephen R. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume 1, Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Johnson, and K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation 130,118-133. Moler, Paul E. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume 111, amphibians and reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Morrison, Joan L. 2001. Recommended management practices and survey protocols for Audubon s crested caracara (Caracara cheriway audubonii) in Florida. Technical Report No. 18. FWC, Bureau of Wildlife Diversity Conservation, Tallahassee, FL. Multi -Species/ Ecosystem Recovery Implementation Team (MERIT) for South Florida, Florida Panther Subteam. 2002. Landscape conservation strategy for the Florida panther in south Florida. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. Rodgers, J.A, H.W. Kale, and H.T. Smith (ed.). 1996. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, birds. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. The Florida atlas of breeding sites for herons and their allies. Nongame wildlife program technical report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL. South Florida Water Management District. June, 2005. Basis of review for environmental resource permit applications within the South Florida Water Management District - Table 4.2.7-1: Listed wildlife species that are aquatic or wetland dependent and that use upland habitats for nesting or denning. SFWMD, West Palm Beach, Florida. Stys, Beth. 1993. Ecology and habitat protection needs of the Southeastern American kestrel on large- scale development sites in Florida. Nongame Wildlife Technical Report #13. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida multi -species recovery plan. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Habitat management guidelines for Audubon s crested caracara in central and southern Florida. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Federally listed and candidate species in Collier County, Florida, Vero Beach, FL. Available online: http://www.fws.gov/verobeach/ (Accessed June, 2015). Ward, Daniel B. (ed.). 1991. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, plants. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. APPENDIX 1 MAIN�� Appendix 1: Tables Table 1. Existing FLUCFCS categories present on the Airport Rd. properties. FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Description Acres % of Total Property 134 Multi -family Residential (high density) 13.10 46.9 190 Open Land 1.84 6.6 422 Brazilian Pepper 1.62 5.8 427E2 Live Oak (Exotics 25% to 50%) 1.55 5.5 437 Australian Pines 0.15 0.5 439 Earleaf Acacia 6.38 22.8 513 Ditch 0.40 1.5 520 Lake 1.99 7.1 814 Roadway and Sidewalk 0.91 3.3 TOTAL ACRES 27.94 Table 2: Survey time Frames Survey Survey Total Survey Date Staff Weather Conditions Survey Time Period Man -Hours 05/24/2022 TH, MO CIear and Ca 73' High 0700 -1.000 6 82Low Cloudy to overcast, Light rain. 06/ 09/ 2022 TH L o w 79' High 85' 1600 -1800 2 Cloudy. Heavy rain ended 07/07/2022 TH survey Low 76' High 93' 1500 -1800 3 Total Survey Man -Hours 11 Appendix 1: Tables Table 3. Wildlife species observed on the Airport Rd. properties and/or within off -site adjacent areas. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS FWC FWS SFWMD BIRDS Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis - - - Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis - - - Northern mockingbird Mims polyglottos - - - Boat -tailed grackle Quiscalits major - - - Blue jay C1 anocitta cristata -- -- MAMMALS Raccoon Procy on lotor - - - Armadillo Dasi us noaemcinctus - - - FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service SFWMD = South Florida Water Management District E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T (S/A) = Threatened (due to similarity of appearance to crocodile) WDS = Wetland dependent species -- = Not Listed * = Indicates species not directly observed but signs of the species (i.e. scat, tracks, etc.) were documented. Note: This table is based on species the results of listed species/wildlife surveys conducted by THA, Inc. Appendix 1: Tables Table 4. Animal species listed by FWS and FWC that were not observed on -site but could utilize or reside on the Airport Rd. properties, along with their relative probability of occurrence. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS PROBABILITY O OCCURRENCE FWS FWC REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Moderate Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus - T Low / Very Low BIRDS Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis - E Very Low Little blue heron Egretta caerulea Moderate Tri color heron Egretta tricolor Moderate MAMMALS Big Cypress fox squirrel rusniger avicennia - T Low Florida black bear +Ucrlstus americanus floridanus _ Low FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened -- = Not Listed Probability of Occurrence = Relative probability of indicated species inhabiting or utilizing the sites as based on the following scale: Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Very Low. A rating of "none" indicates it is highly unlikely that the species may inhabit or utilize the area (no probability). THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT The Haven at North Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ) Prepared for: Johnson Development Associates, Inc. 100 Dunbar Street Spartanburg, SC 29306 Phone: 864-594-6740 Collier County, Florida 12/02/2022 Prepared Trebilcoc 2800 Dau Naples, F Phone: 7 Email: n1 <Const is Bou6 L 3410� 39-56fi rehilco Collier Countv Tra nsoortation Methodoloav Fee*-$500.00 Fee Collier Countv Transportation Review Fee* -Major Studv-$1.500.00 Fee Note -'to be collected at time of firs[ submittal Naven at North Naples—PUDZ—TIS—December 2022 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. ``�.;�pN J:"TpFe�•,,, Digitally signed by Norman Pe*T' �b eNiie. G,•,; Trehilcock This item has been electronically signetl antl sealetl �_�:' No arir '•.Y+.F= by Norman J. Trehilcock, P.E., State of Florida DN: c=US, St=Florida, l=Naples, license 4T116, using a SHA-i euthenticagon cotle. _ * = o=Norman Trehilcock, Printetl copies of this tlocumeM are not consitlered %9'•. STATE or ?wc cn=Norman Trehilcock signetl antl sealed, antl the SHA-1 authenticatlen ��'�� cme must be veriged on any eieMronic copies. '•,,Py`•.<.on>.vry �° email=ntrebilco<k@trebilcock.biz 'o, s1pNA�Et,a,� Date: 2022.12.0215:15:39-OS'00' 7ebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE '.ion No. 47116 :onsulting Solutions, PA Boulevard, Suite 200 f4104 ert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trehilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 2 xowmotwurthwonles—ruoz—ro—oe,enberzozz Table f Contents Project Description ............................................................. ThpGeneration----------------------. Trip Distribution and Assignment ....................................... Background Traffic .............................................................. ExishngandFutureRoadvvayNetvvork----------. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis.. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis ............................................ Improvement Analysis ........................................................ Mitigation ofImpact ........................................................... Appendices --------------------4 --------------------5 --------------------6 ____________________g -------------------.lO -------------------.lO -------------------.l] -------------------.l3 -------------------.l3 Appendix /tProject K4aster5heP|an------------------------_-----l4 Appendix 8:Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) .................................................. l6 AppendixC: |TETrip Generation Calculations and Land Use Code Descriptions ........................ ]6 Appendix D:F5UTM5Model Distribution .................................................................................... 4] AppendixE: Collier County Transportation Element Northwest TCMA and Hurricane Evacuation Haven at North Naples—PUOZ—TIS-0ecember2022 Proje, The Haver Orange BII County, F6 Refer to Fi I" q !Al Pr i mo Haven at North Naples (Project Location) r il W, il '1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 4 Haven of North Naples — PUDZ — Tl5 — December 2022 access on Airport Road. An emergency only cross -access for exit only through the Bear Creek community is also proposed. The proposed development parameters are illustrated in Table 1. Table 1 ITE — Development Land Use Designation Development Land Use — [SIC Codes] ITE LUC — Land Use Size (ITE variable) The Haven at Townhomes — [Not Applicable] 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low - 336 (dwelling units) North Naples Rise) Carlisle Assisted Living Facility— [Not 254—Assisted Living 371,000 (square feet) Applicable] 350 (beds) Traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated generally based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 111h Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. In agreement with ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designation is illustrated in Table 1. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of a Site Development Plan or Development Order application to determine turn lane requirements, as more accurate parameters become available. A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on June 6, 2022, via email (ref. Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)). Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version, is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations and Land Use Code Descriptions. Based on ITE recommendations and Collier County Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) guidelines, no reductions for internal capture or pass -by trips have been taken into consideration. Trip generation comparison for assisted living facility can be found in Appendix C. Square footage was determined to be the highest trip generator for the Carlisle Development. The trip generation associated with the proposed build -out conditions is summarized in Tables 2A and 213. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 5 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 Table 2A Project Trip Generation — Build -out Conditions — Average Weekday Daily Two -Way ITE Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Volume Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Multifamily Housing (Low- 2,229 30 97 127 104 61 165 Rise) Table 2B Operational Trip Generation — Build -out Conditions — Average Weekday Daily Two -Way ITE Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Volume Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Multifamily Housing (Low- 2,229 30 97 127 104 61 165 Rise) Assisted Living Facility 1,554 106 35 141 57 121 178 Total 3,783 136 132 268 161 182 343 In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment The project traffic distribution pattern was estimated using the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model (FSUTMS). Traffic generated by the proposed development is assigned to the roadway segments perthe distribution provided in the FSUTMS Model. The model overview of the distribution forthe project can be found in Appendix D. Due to the limitations of the program, the model was not able to accurately represent the exit for the Carlisle onto Orange Blossom Drive as an exit only. As such, 67% of traffic from the Carlisle on Orange Blossom Dr is not accurate and it would be expected that 75% of the Carlisle traffic will use the link of Airport Rd from the project access to Orange Blossom Dr, which currently shows 0% on the model. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 16 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 The peak direction associated with the peak hour for the analyzed roadway segments is taken from the currently adopted Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR). The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3 and it is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Proposed Development —Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Collier Distribution of Project PM Peak Hour Project Vol. ili Roadway Link County Roadway Link Location Traffic Link No. Enter Exit Airport Road 2.2 Orange Blossom Drive to 43.8% SB — 46 NB — 27 Project Access Airport Road 2.2 Project Access to Pine 56.2% NB - 58 SB - 34 Ridge Road Airport Road 2.1 Vanderbilt Beach Road 38 1% SB — 40 NB —23 to Orange Blossom Drive Orange Blossom 1420 . Goodlette-Frank Road to 2.6% EB - 3 WB - 2 Drive Airport Road Orange Blossom 143.0 Airport Road to 3 2% WB - 3 EB 2 Drive Livingston Road Note(s): 1) Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 7 Haven at North Naples—PUDZ—TIS—Decem6er2022 Figure 2 —Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution by �� r Percentage T� kq � 3.2 2.6% ,k ' ■ 'ter 56.2% r Project Trip �' 1 v _ Distribution by . t � � � r i PM Peak Hour I t� EB: 2 W8:2 ''WB:3 • - - l 1'� NB: 27 � SB: 34 i I I r r . 1 •-. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 8 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 i . • 1' 1' M Average background traffic growth rates are estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from peak hour peak direction volume (estimated from 2008 through 2021), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) volume plus the trip bank volume. The higher of the two determinations is to be used in the Roadway Link Level of Service analysis. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2027. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2021- 2027) 2027 Projected 2027 Projected 2021 AUIR Pk Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Pk Hr, Peak Dir CC Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Volume Growth Factor w/out Project Bank w/out Project ID # (trips/hr) Rate (��/yr) ill (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Trip Growth Factor (2) Bank (3) Orange Blossom Airport Road 2.2 Drive to Project 2,060 2.0% 1.1262 2,320 75 2,135 Access Airport Road 2.2 Project Access to 2,060 2.0% 1.1262 2,320 75 2,135 Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Airport Road 2.1 Road to Orange 2,100 2.0% 1.1262 2,365 43 2,143 Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Orange 142.0 Road to Airport 490 2.0% 1.1262 552 26 516 Blossom Drive Road Orange Airport Road to 143.0 490 2.0% 1.1262 552 73 563 Blossom Drive Livingston Road Note(s): 1) Annual Growth Rate — Historical Growth Rate or 2% minimum. 2) Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate)6. 2027 Projected Volume = 2021 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. 3) 2027 Projected Volume = 2021 AUIR Volume + Trip Bank. The projected 2027 Peak Hour— Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 9 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TlS — December 2022 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2021 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC 2021 Peak 2027 Peak AUIR Roadway Link 2021 2021 Min. Dir, Peak Hr 2027 2027 Min. Dir, Peak Hr Roadway Link Roadway Standard Roadway Standard Link ID Location Capacity Capacity # Condition LOS Volume Condition LOS Volume Orange Blossom Airport Road 2.2 Drive to Project 6D E 3,000 6D E 3,000 Access Airport Road 2.2 Project Access to 6D E 3,000 6D E 3,000 Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Airport Road 2.1 Road to Orange 6D E 3,000 6D E 3,000 Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Orange 142.0 Road to Airport 2D D 1,320 2D D 1,320 Blossom Drive Road Orange Airport Road to 143.0 2U D 1,000 2U D 1,000 Blossom Drive Livingston Road Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which are evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon year 2027. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 without the project at 2027 future build -out conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the surrounding roadway network. The analyzed roadway segments are not located within the Collier County's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). In addition, the proposed development is not situated within the County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCEA's and TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2027 Roadway Min LOS Min LOS CC AUIR 2027 Peak Link Peak 2027 Peak % Vol exceeded exceeded Roadway Link Link ID Roadway Link Dir, Peak Hr Dir, Peak Dir, Peak Hr Capacity without with # Location Capacity Hr (Project Volume Impact by Project? Project? Volume Vol Added) w/Project (2) Project Yes/No Yes/No Orange Blossom Airport Road 2.2 Drive to Project 3,000 NB — 27 2,347 0.9% No No Access Project Access Airport Road 2.2 to Pine Ridge 3,000 NB — 58 2,378 2.0% No No Road Vanderbilt Airport Road 2.1 Beach Road to 3,000 NB — 23 2,388 0.8% No No Orange Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Orange 142.0 Road to Airport 1,320 WB — 2 554 0.2% No No Blossom Drive Road Orange 143.0 Airport Road to 1,000 WB-3 566 0.3% No No Blossom Drive Livingston Road Note(s): 1) Refer to Table 3 from this report. 2) 2027 Projected Volume = 2027 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. As illustrated in Collier County LDC Chapter 6.02.02 — M.2, once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS significance criterion, the development's impacts are not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. Policy 5.1 of the Collier County Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) states that "the County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — T1S — December 2022 an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved." The analyzed roadway links are located within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCMAs designation is provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). In agreement with Policy 5.7 of the Transportation Element, the TCMA concurrency is measured on a system -wide basis such that each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards. Based on the information contained in 2021 AUIR, the Northwest TCMA percent lane miles meeting standard is 97.2%. As illustrated in the Policy 5.8, transportation mitigation may be required when the proposed development will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1% of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of the GMP Transportation Element. As illustrated in Policy 5.8(d) — Transportation Element, no impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. It is noted that Airport Road are Collier County designated hurricane evacuation routes as depicted in Collier County Transportation Element — Map TR - 7. For details refer to Appendix D. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Access to the site is proposed as an interconnect with the existing Carlisle entrance on Airport Rd. The existing configuration is a right-in/right-out and a directional left -in. A right -out only access is proposed between the existing Carlisle entrance and Bear Creek entrance along Airport Rd. An emergency cross access for exiting vehicles only through Bear Creek is also proposed, although no exiting vehicles will be distributed there. The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways-40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; (b) multi- lane divided roadways— right -turn lanes shall always be provided; and (c) when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left -turn lanes. Airport Road is a 6-lane, divided facility with a posted speed limit within the vicinity of the project of 45 mph. Orange Blossom Drive is a 2-lane, divided facility west of Airport Rd and a 2-lane, undivided facility east of Airport Rd. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TlS — December 2022 Airport Road — Main Site Access The project proposed entrance has an existing direct connection to Airport Rd. Based on the County's multi -lane criteria, a dedicated southbound right -turn lane and a dedicated northbound left -turn lane are warranted at the site access location. The existing connection has a right turn lane and a directional left turn lane. Airport Road — Exit Only The developer proposes a right -out only exit between the access for the Carlisle and Bear Creek. With this access, the left -turn lane at Lone Oak Blvd will be channelized to prevent anyone exiting the property from this exit to use that turn lane. All traffic trying to go northbound must travel to the southbound left turn lane servicing the Hyundai Dealership development to make a U-turn, decreasing the impact on the constrained left -turn lane at Lone Oak Blvd. Bear Creek Cross Access — Emergency Exit Only The developer proposes a cross -access with Bear Creek to be used as an emergency egress from the property. No traffic will be expected to normally use this egress point. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points —turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Improvement Analysis Based on the results illustrated within this traffic analysis, the proposed project is not a significant traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. None of the analyzed links are projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2027 build -out conditions. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of a Site Development Plan or Development Order application to determine turn lane requirements, as more accurate parameters become available. The southbound left -turn lane at Lone Oak Blvd will be channelized to prevent the vehicles exiting at the proposed exit -only on Airport Rd is recommended to minimize the impact on this turn lane. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 13 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ— TlS — December 2022 W1111cal Ib 1 • • lyralif Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Ga�w � LMUIENMPROPosF➢ZOMN(tA,MPMD —__ __ __ ZONINGA - I I MWEMNROPOBEO Fw �eIDW.TION: URBMI oxx,M. w, us COLLIER COUNIYLINiARY J REBIODENTI�suaO SlNIciINRPORTGRUSIE MxE0 u8F O,amw, w.w NEADWARTERS BRANCH sua Ism ORANGE BLOBSOM DRNE pROPosaO uxOu �� I TRACFA: 9�1� �IOHT TURN �-�I ZONING CpUO (ITALIAN L •..•� TRACER: O (Edetlnp) 28'rYPE 9'LBEJ y`'= AMERICAN CLUBHOUSE) 1 2 I " • TOi�TI�]RAC o iaxnro II USE:ITALIAN AMERICAN d egg e. LLUB WIPLEB 1 � WnxsnMCENTTOORANCE eIossON ML: XfrYPEO O TYPE•A"LRE e j, Fpu Nsrto.a.lea. Po. u�� F� 1 hONGVIIEW CENTER) ��iD ITALIAN AMERICPN CLI@HWBEC0.O TRP.CTA use RETAIL NURSERY :tb TVPEA ExrroIXURroar puwNG RonD: mTTRE G zorvwaA g �DRJ �Z USE UNGEVELOPEO I PROPERTY. wNleM seuuGBE 9Mu BEsr:ae'oF W c.�-Mv g __ ,o irPE A LB I aPEN s nmRwl NMu�� n, aei. ay.w __ LB ve '.Po.' I MIN. REOURE OF898%=8.94 AL. I PNALU I�TgATE mEEPRFS S.0 nnONTHE OELELOPER REpUIREMENT — - - �eanMTOA u w OFFSRE, mE DEVELOPER a�NNLOOGTE:1,56 AG IeB:9 ea�TM LIGE�OUNTYOR TDANOTHEH ZONING WGISUNSHINE r, vme same ZONING RPUD E _ �s.vTsur.e +M (.yV ILLAGEI .•--— — ------- __ � ' __ " (MAPLES VIEV✓) USE STORMWATER aq vm w�,w�im o wl USE: SINGLE FAMILY _DENS TY:RNe DTI-FAMI vowEUING UNIie MANAGEMENT LAKE �,e'ENHANCEDTVPER LRE . HT 1 RE810FNTULL INreN31ry IIXISTINGa,rI: MAAMUM FAR OFO,ef iTR4CT B�� L AnoNs sEN v �--- «+,cGRGwHGuslNClsEExs PSLIEF FRDM,nL --- TTPE�P"LBET awn nncctaeaHry sEC. G,,G�PHOUSNO. WHICH SiAmSTfE MAx:F�'AREa no7O a�F��LDaWDtFPGHouSING zarvwc RSF-, ,o � .na jro, sHUL IXEEDo..a. USE: SINGLE FAMILY soxuwrf ssNr ZIXiING PUD MAeeMUMFAR OF R.88 RESIDEMIAL oxmm.ro,,. Prnveema (LONE ONU �OEVIARON T(IONa Ee �OeI FFER REOUIREiE�LIEF I UBE: MtLTIFAMILY OM LCC 9E - u N,s. N Haas eeNLroir6�lI1� '///'# RESDENNAL TPSlE 2e,WMICH REOUBESAI6 WIDE, TYPEB I I ETER LANDSCAPE RIIFFERWHERE THE PROrosEo . IL_- �� i , ULTi+AMLLY OEVELOOME��I9AGJPCENT iG ZLMiINGPUD (BEAR PARK)USE I I IMETER UND9CPPE BUFTiR aETWEEN MULTIfAMLV REBIDENTML E9E u9E9. - INOI GTEe lANDBCAPE B,eFFER MEAs THEIMVEN AT NORTH � e �v'S.L"^ EXHIBIT C ���" Haven of North Noples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 .. , 1 i'1 1 • '' Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 Haven a[ North Naples—PUDZ—i15—December 2022 INITL4L MEETING CHECISIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheei to easmx that no fmponmt elemrnts are orerlooked Crou ant the itemsthat do not apple, or Nl9 (vat applicable). Dm: 7sme 6. 2022 Time: NIA Location N/A— Via Email People Attendiv: Name. Organization. and Telephone Nmnbers i) Nelson Galemo. Collis Cmmn Growth Management Oni 2) Miehael5awas. Ca0ier County Growth hanagement Divis 3) Novmv hebikods. 7C5 4) Haiku Martin. TCS Smdv Preparers Preparer's Name and 7iile: Nomam Trebilcod. AICP. PTOE PE Organvatioa TrebikorJc n.�adsm• Soktiws. PA Addms: 2500 Danis Blvd Sm[e 200.Naples. FL 34104 ph 239-252-5738 Rniewer(sl: Resiewei s Name R Title: Nelsw Galemo. PE Organization & Telephone Nsm,6c. Growth Manseement Dixisiov ph 239-252-2613 Apptinvr. Appliant's Name: Johnson Development Associates. Inc_ Address: 100 Dsmbaz Srteet Spartanburg_ SC 29306 Telephone Nimabex: 86i594-5740 Proposed Dn'elopment: Name: The Grove PUD Rezone Lacatiov: Southwest comsofAvport-PdlineRd and OnaeeBlossomlk (refs to Fie.l) Lavdtlu Type: Assiskdliviog Fadity and Multitamih� Homme TIE Cade #. LUC 254—Amsted Living' LUC 220 — Mdtifamily Housing(Low-Rise) Desmptios The TIS is to eshbiish the teffic as dated with the proposed PUDZ apphCatioa. I'h PUD ismapased to have a shared access w-eh the Carlisle. The developer Proposes 340 multi5mily (low-rise) dweRmgm_in. Page I of 9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1J Haven at North NaPtes—PU!)Z—i15—December 2022 Zomn Eaisring A - A¢riculnne Comprehensive play recommendation:yo cLao¢e Requerted: Allow decelopmem Findines oftM Shdytype: Si peak hour trim The TIS will ¢nmena. s Rwdwar critmon The aoahzed Conrnnm Policy 5 4 and AvportRoadi 1®t of45 rap: Oaw¢e Blossc posted speed h Roadway Lm1 is desi®ated a The report ail and collector r The TIS shall' Fyt1—ProjettL«ationMap A For vary-ShNy: Proien is located within the Ivocthwest TCMA. rated taoiect net new traffic vohme ureacer than 100 PM 2-way aiv watifies for a Maim TTS. e AM -PM «ak Gam trip ¢erxntipn. vaf5c distrthutron and ¢e test and roadwry Imk arch• " . amlvsis — Gazed on PM Peak Hom weekday traffic — 2%.R%Jd'i. meat is 1«ated within tLe Comdr's desi�ated hanspomtion xnt Areas RCNAsI. The TCMAs' deli®atrom are prodded m ce Translwrtavon Element of the Growth Dlmaeement Play aced as a minor anerial_ 6-lam diaided madwav with a posted speed • is desi�ated az a ma or collector 2-lam divided made e�with a D ®L. ran¢e Blossom Druz from Atrpmt Road to Goodlette-Frank Road named roadway. rat the impact the proposed proiea will haax w desi®ated arterial aem xith Collier CawN TIS Guidelims and Procedures. Paee' of 9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 18 Haven a[ North Naples-PUDZ-TIS- December2022 Sib out Cs Ca des No Ivb eriYht-IN �vided ovto 2013-�57. A lication s will bemm azsbv mtaz arto_m. Stock Isye: (ifnot vet incseax, openhosw smsly) SmallSule 775 ❑ Minor TlS ❑ SmdcArca: Boundaries: Eazt-Aizpok Pulline Rd: Nokh-Osanee Blossom Dr Ad&tional mtersectiom tv be awl}a3 N!A BvOd-out Year 2027 Planing HosssonYear 2027 Analysis Tone Pxiod(s): Covcsmevcy-PAS Pea]; Hour.Operational-AM and Phf Peak Hom- Fatme Off -Site Developments: N/A Sousce of Tsip Genentiw Rates: TIE l l° Editov Redncdons fa Trio Genenkon Rates: None IylA Pass-T}•osps (PS11)): N/A hkemal hips: NIA Traysk vse: NfA Other N!A Horizon Tear Roadway Netwarklmprvs-ements: 2027 Afrthodalom�- & 9ssnmptbns: Non -site taffic estimates: Co1Brr Courts• ha&c eo®ts and 2021 Al)Bl 5ke-mp geoerartaa OTISS-HE 11ds Edition Trip dishsbutiom FSDTMS Model-refto Fi. Tsa(6c assigmvmt methad)aaiee trip�e�mflov with 6ackerowd svosvds Traffic gon�th sate: hisrosical,RowOa mte ar 29: minimsm< Ting movemm[ assi�ment Pro ect Access - Evgneer s estimate -refer to Fie.3_ Page 3 of 9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 19 Haven at North Noples—PUOZ—TIS—Oecem6er 2022 Fi_. 2 — Projrct Irip Disttibotion Project Trip � i • � � t � 7 i` Distribution for _ � � � The Grove by Percenta e ae.ix V T � r i F' .3—Project 7nroip¢ Uoremepts w. rw y .� vMc.e�r ov nx E..tSo<I r� r � • � �JI 5tl) Gattub: �5Ni Mi e0Y I MF 50 ]tl . Pag, of9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 20 Haven at North Naples—PUDZ—TIS—December 202Z Special Feamn Accidevls locati Sigh[ dista¢ce: j Queumg'N.!A Access lacatio¢ 7ra�c w¢troL Sigval system Is Oo-site pazling Dam S¢mces' C Bau maps�NlA Poor study repo Attess poll y ¢ Re��ew process &equueme¢b' F Miscellaneous: SmaLL Scale Stud}• —No Fee Mma study-E750.00 Majm study-alsoo.00 Medrodolog}•Fee f5o0.00 S Luludes 0 mtasections Additional Ntersections - 5500 00 each AllJrrs nd¢ bragrrcdro dying Mr MrdrdWnpr amrempandmurt erpnd ro Tranzoorraven prior�o evrrianopan lAr PYAndon- sfcNAnTeFs NOrvu.Aat TYLV]LL¢DGV2. Study Prepnrer Irormav Trebdsmck Reviewers) Apptivmt Paee ^ of 9 Trebllmck Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 21 Naven of North Naples-PUDZ-TIS-December 2022 Collier Could iraffie Impmt StaW Aeziew Fre Sehedide Fees will be paid maemmaRy u the dm�dopmem procred;: MetisdolaRy Amiew, Anal.-,i: Auiew; and Sufficimry Reviews. Feu far adtitional mrem� a mhx oPtiovl unirez ve zlzo pamidedbelow- $f ethodeloso Review - $300 Fre btetiodology Review iorludu miew of a mbmined methodobgy ztvemmr, ivclalivE review of mbvdmedtrip generatiane;emve(z), dismbation azzieamenS avdmiew ofa "Small Seale Study' deteamivuoa writtm appmvaL'eommeot-, on a pmpozed methoddoEy mtemm[ aM waittm confirmation o£ a rcmbmitted mmhd methodoloEy mtmw, and ove mreti� in Callix Cpwh. ifneeded '$mall $tale $mdr' Aeaier-P'o dddirioval Fee (Ivdadu owe sv�rimrz resaew) Upm approval of tlw metiodology review, tlx app4caa may mbmit the xWv. 'fhe miew mchdu: a cv detvminatim, site inymtion avd confirmation of the study mmpr.'^..with tip gmentioa du-hrbmon udmavm® tbreshold complimce "l. Imor Smdr Redevs " - $730 Fre (Includes eve mffurmrr nriesrl Review o£fhe mhmiOM t<affic avlyssz melodez- optionil fold vivt to site, a of pip gmencan dishrbntioa sal azzi�meor, mw.meney deimminatiw, cmfirmatim of commuted i�roa�mmt, rnim• of tra&c cope dun wllxned•'azs®bled mim� of o8-;ite imprm�emeat widrin the zifLf-wf-way, aeziew of sirt access avd mrnlatioa avd PrePamtion and renew of `sv$umc}'` cammeNzlgne:4m:, "{laior Studr Renew-'- 51,300 Fre (Lcludes eww ivtersertiov aeilsdz and iwo a�rim reriewzl Rniewofthe mbmittedtraffic maly�s ivrlvdes: fieldvisit ro site, mofiamatian of trip Emmauec special trip Emenum avdrm viP lenSt6 ztody, duerbotion avd vsi�mmt, m dehnmivtion mvfizmatirm of co�imd impom-mmt, m of traffic vah�e dm eolleded'sszwhled miew of traffm Powth analysis, review of off -site roadway apentiovs and capaciry analyi:, resieee of sue access and armlmoa neigibmdmod traffic irmvsirm issoez, avy nary impmsmentpmymals sal associated cat e.�timazc, aodpaepv-ation and miew ofvp to two romds of"sa&cievcy" rvmmm¢'gnstimz and•'ez recommended mvLeonz of appmvaL °•Addidoval iet nov Review°-%00 Fee ihe..riew�otadditienalmw:emon;:halt m<lnda tse same paa�eters a; owlrona mdw nfaia Study Review' avd shall apply to each mterection abmw th 6zt mo iNerxctiaa; mchaded mthe Db]m Study Reaiew" {ddidooal SvEfir4ncr Reviews'-5300 Fee Additional sv6rcien yaenewsbevvvdthozeminally inelvdedintieaPPooPriata zmdYz6aRnyuve the additimilFee primto the eompletim oftlw reeiew_ Pace 6 of 9 Trebilcock Consuhing Solutions, PA Page � 22 Haven of North Noples—PUDZ—TIS— December 2022 Appendix A: Trip Generation ITE 1 Vh Edition Page 7 of 9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 23 Haven of North Naples—PU02—TIS—Uecembec2022 LUC ?SJ Assisted Liv iue—Ilia Geaeratioa Comoaeisoa ... .qa. .mw Page 8 of 9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PP P a g e Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 LOMOU;* bare W*00*V [AM Peak H*w PM hek H*w rittry Wt EftUV EA EAUY jWt 254. 4.6~1 LIV,.# UrbarklSuburbl la�j Sc- Ft. AS;A 6731 674 91 3C 5C VX R*(1'j(1'W C r C f, G C Ire-wral C C C C C C C C C Fun- zas-tr• 67; 6711 92 31 5C D Howh,,S K*w41*0 V-)t Gmato W Trac ft jG4maral 340 DWf,00,8 Wits JIM 1127 31 97 195 5; Rtducdor, 1j r. C Irfafral C1) E C ram -by C C C 4 C ( ri'1-SqSAv IIN 1127 31 T. 1135 5; TC424 19W 101 1 A :_27 155 1 T.W Redoglian C C Tg"t lnwnAl C ToW PA*o-by J CI C [Uud 1201 IL 12 155 is, Paze 9 of 9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 25 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ—TiS — December 2022 ITE 1 Generation Calculations1` Land Use Code Descriptions Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 26 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 Land Use: 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Description Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have two or three floors (levels). Various configurations fit this description, including walkup apartment, mansion apartment, and stacked townhouse. - A walkup apartment typically is two or three floors in height with dwelling units that are accessed by a single or multiple entrances with stairways and hallways. - A mansion apartment is a single structure that contains several apartments within what appears to be a single-family dwelling unit. - A fourplex is a single two-story structure with two matching dwelling units on the ground and second floors. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided through a central entry and stairway. • A stacked townhouse Is designed to match the external appearance of a townhouse. But, unlike a townhouse dwelling unit that only shares walls with an adjoining unit, the stacked townhouse units share both floors and walls. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided through a central entry and stairway. Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), affordable housing (Land Use 223), and off -campus student apartment (low-rise) (Land Use 225) are related land uses. Land Use Subcategory Data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: (1) not close to rail transit and (2) close to rail transit. A site is considered close to rail transit if the walking distance between the residential site entrance and the closest rail transit station entrance is % mile or less. Additional Data For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the iTETripGen web app or the trip 252 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 27 Haven at North Naples - PUDZ - TlS - December 2022 generation resource page on the ITE webslte (hops://www.lte:org/technlcal resources/topics/trip: and parkin -generation. For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. it is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are ►►ke* correlated to the trips generated by a res►dentia► site. To assist In future analysis, trip generation studies of all multifamily housing should attempt to obtain Information on occupancy rate and on the mix of residential unit sizes (►.e., number of units by number of bedrooms at the site complex). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in British Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Washington. Source Numbers 188, 204, 237, 300, 305, 306, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 525, 530, 579, 583, 638, 864, 866, 896, 901, 903, 904, 936, 939, 944, 946, 947, 948, 963, 964, 966, 967,1012,1013,1014,1036,1047,1056, 1071,1076 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 253 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 128 Haven at North Naples-PUDZ-i15-December2022 Land Use: 254 Assisted Living Desuiptio An assisted 9ersignt ar physical r but does no social and p The comple located sep Assisted ra s of the dromiciliary e-wnicr care retiren Additlonal Oata The technical appendices provide suppordrg information on timeof-day distrmutions for this land use. Tne appendices can be aaessed through ehher the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the I7E website (https/lwww.he.ag/lepMical-resources/topics/trip- and-p rk g-9 neration/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 7990s, the 2000s, and the 2070s in Connecticut, New Jersey, New Vorir. Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. Source Nlilt76ra 244, 573, 587, 611, 725, 876, 877, 912, 7016, 1029 ,aM General Ur4eN9uburbanaM eural (Lantl Uses 000-399) as Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 29 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 Haven at North Naples PUD — Trip Generation — Average Weekday Project Information Project Name: Haven at North Naples No: Date: 8/25/2022 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use ` size Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit (General Urban/Suburban) 336 Dwelling Units 1115 1114 30 97 104 61 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 1115 1114 30 97 104 61 Total 1115 1114 30 97 104 61 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totallnternai 0 0 0 0 0 01 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 1115 1114 30 97 104 61 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 30 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Weekday Project Name: Haven at North Naples No: Date: 8J25J2022 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 220 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 336 Weekday Best Fit (LIN) Housing (Low -Rise) - T = 6A I (X)+75.31 Not Close to Rail Transit (General Urban'Suburban) FE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 1115 1114 2229 50% 50% ExternalTrips 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 31 Haven at North Naples—PUDZ—TIS—December2@2 PERIOD SETTING Analysts Neme: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Haven at North Naples No: Da[e: &25I2022 Clry: State/Province: 21PIPoaMl Cotle: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Nama: Etlltion: Tnp Generedon Manuel, 11N Ed Land Uae Indepentlant Slxe Tlme Period McNotl Entry Exit Total v.Hame 220-Mulgfemiy Dwellirg Units s3Elal Weaktlay, Peek Bast Frt (LIN) 3g 9] 12T Housing (Low-Risel- Hour of Adjacent T=031 (X)i22.85 24% ]8% No[ Close to Rail Street TrelPo Transit (Gerrerel Orie Haur UrbaN3uburben) Between ]end 9 (07 indicates sae out of range. a.m. ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Ad7acant Stmt TreMc, One Hour Between ]and 9 a.m. Landuse No tlevietrons from tfr. McNads No tleviations hom ITE. F�Remel Trips 220-MulMamily Housing (Low-Rise)-NotCbse to Rail Transit (GeneralUNeNSUWmen) ITE tloes rat recommend a pertiwlar passby%far Nis case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 32 Haven at North Naples—PUDZ—TIS—Oecember2@2 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Nema: PM Peak Hgur Project Name: Haven et North Naples No: Date. BI252622 city: State/Province: 21plPoatal Cotle: Country: Client Name: Anelyet's Nama: Etlltlon: Trip Generation Manual, llN Etl Lentl Uae Intlepentlenl Size Time Perlotl McNotl Entry Ezit TOGI Variable 22g-Multtlamiy Dwelling Un3s _,���I Weektlay, Peak Best PR (LIN) i6a 61 165 Housing (Low -Rise)- Hour of Adjacent T=643 (%)«20.55 63% 3T% Nat Close to Rail Street TreR , Trensit (Generel One Hour Urban/Suburban) BeNraen 4 antl 6 p m. 1g7 indicates size out of range. ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weektlay, Peak Hour of Atllacent Street Trefic, One Xosr Between 4 antl 6 p.m. Lantluse No deviations from ITE_ McNatls No deviations fmmlTE. Exmmai Taps 220-MUltifamiiy Housing lLow-Rise)-Not Close to Reli Trensk (Genwal UrbenlSubuNen) ITE does not recommentl a particular pess-0y%fw Nis case. Solutions, PA Page � 33 Haven a[North Naples—PUDZ—i15—Uecember2022 The Carlisle Trip Generation Compai Prol.n ldormatlan Prnlezt Nama: Grlisle Nn: pace: crtv: State/Province: Zip/Portal Coda: Ceunlry: Client Name: Analyzt'z Nam¢: Edition: rip Generation A Trebllcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 34 Hoven at North Naples-FUUZ-TIS-December 2022 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Weektlay Pro)eet Name: Carlisle No: Date: sr3lzo2s city: statelProvince: LplPostal cone: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Etlition: Trip Genemtbn Manual, 11tl1 EO LarrO Use Intlepentlent Size Time Perlotl McNotl Entry Fait Total Wnable 254-Assisletl LNYg Bells a;,tl;��� VleektlaY Average d551+i d551+1 91d�1 (General 26 50Y. 509e UNaVSuburban) 256-Assisletl livkig- 10W Sq. FL GFA 3T11o� Weektlay Average Pif+1 T7H+1 t5,y1+) 1 (General 4.19 SSG Sp% Urt1aNSufwNan) (g) mtlicales size oul or range. (I) intlirates small sample sCe, use mrefuity. ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Yieektlay Lantluse No OevlaOi Mcltlotls No Oehab Fxiemal Taps 254-Assr. fTE does r 254-Asa'. frE (Ices r Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 135 Haven at North Naples- PUDZ-TIS-December 2022 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Carlisle Nc: Dare: 6ranazz city: statelPromnce: LpIPosWI cone: Country: Client Name: Anarys['s Name: Etlkion: Thp Genemtbn Manual, 11fi etl was use mtlepencent size rmei vaname 254-Assktea Living Betls 3„p:ei Week UrWJSuburoan) Street arer Berore zsa-Assistetl uvmq- loon sq. D. cPA a�1m� week 1 (Geneal Hours uroamsutwroan) street rnte k aemwe Io) maicaces size out orange. p) mtlloles smao sample sae, use cnemiy. ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weektlay, Peak Hou. wntluse No r Metlrotls No r Fxtemal Trips 25a RE 25a NE Trebllrock Consuking Solutions, PA Page 36 Haven at Nor[h Naples-PUDZ-i15-Decemher 2022 PERIOD SETTING Anal Proi Bme Stan cou Ana Lantl Use IntleperMent Siu Time Perlotl Nethotl Envy Ezit Total VaaaCle 254-Asslsletl Llving Betls 3a0i°:i Weekasy, Peak Aveage 33 51 84 (General Four of Atljacent 0.24 39% 6t% UNan/Sulwn»n) Street T2111c, One Hout Between 4 arM 6 p.m. 25d-Assistetl living- t0005q_FL GFA 3]Ito� Weekday, Peak Average :.]":' 121�'" I]8i'' 1 (Gene21 Hour of AtlJacent 0.48 32% 68% UNaNSuliwban) Street TraR , Orle Hour Between 4 arM 6 p.m. (0) Ina©tes sae alit of ange. (I) In0lcates small sample sze, use carefulty. VNektlay, Peak !lour Larltluse rvoa Ltematls Ho a. Fxtemal Tnps 254- ITE 0 254- rrE a m M; As A RE DEVIATION DETAILS PA Page 3] Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 Operational Trip Generation for Shared Entrance — Average Weekday Project Information Project Name: Haven at North Naples Operations No: Date: 8/25/2022 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour' Entry, Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit (General Urban/Suburban) 336 Dwelling Units 1133 1132 32 102 108 63 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 1133 1132 32 102 108 63 254 - Assisted Living (General Urban/Suburban) 3711000 Sq. Ft. GFA 777 777 106 35 57 121 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 777 777 106 35 57 12 Total 1910 1909 138 137 165 18 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 Totallnternal 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 1910 1909 138 137 165 184 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 38 Haven a[ North Noples—PUDZ-715—December 2022 PERIOD SETTING Anaysi Project Date: StaG/P Counlr Analys' lana � zzo-m Housln Not G[ Tfansa ua>Nv. 25d -P (eerier UNan/ joj inai I I I inai RE DEVIATION DETAILS YYaekUay Larduse No aeNatlons ha Mamas no-Mulmamiyi me chosen mem EtlertW Taps 720-MulUtamflyl f1E aces not [ec[ 2W-Ass5te0 LF fTE aces MS fen Trebilco<k ConSUlting Solutions, PA Page 39 Haven of Narth Naples—PUDZ—TIS—December 2622 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Haven al North Naples No: Dpcvaf s Date: u252022 City: StatelProvince: ZiplPostal Code: Country: Client Nama: Analyst's Name: EtlNion: Thp Generation Manual, 11d1 EO lantl Use Intlepentlent Size Time Pariotl MCNad Entry Exit Total Variable 220-Mulkfamly Dwelling Untts 336�0� Weektlay, Peak Average 32 102 13d Housing (Law4215e)- Hourof Atljamrt 04 24% 76% Nol Gose to Rail Street Tralttc, Transtt (General One Hour UfbmVSNJUfbarl) Between 7 and 9 254-Assisted LNirg 1W0 S¢FL GFA 371fo1 Weekday, Peak Average 106111 g5t11 1411r1 (General Hour of Adlacent g_38 76% 25b UrbaNSubuman) Street Tmlk4 One Hae Bekvicen ] arM 9 (DJ inmuntes sue cuter range. a m. (I i intlitates Small sample she, use rareNWy Weekday, Peak! Lantluse I Mettwds Fs[emal ThPs St ill dt rg eet t E. slog Aver sing ientl, (� ieM TTE DEVIATION DETAILS I-ama l av-F ge) B Lower I pargi IU r parGi on rp� ula bar fa Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 40 Haven a[ North Naples—PUDZ—TIS—December 2022 Analysts Name: PM Pei ProjeM Name: Haven. operotF Date: 82520 s[atelProvince: Country: Analyst's Name: Lana uze maepenaenl Variable 2zD-Munaamry Dwenmg unn Housing (Low-Wse)- Nol Cbse to Rall Trdnsll (General UmaNSuboman) 254-Assislea Living 1000 Sq. R (General umanrsuamtan) Ibl Inmcates see oN of range. (I � IrWicales small sample size. use c PERIOD SETTING EXTERNAL TRIPS LarW Use Paaemal Pass-0y% Passby Trips Nonyass-0y � mps Y10-Mu11Ramlty Haaing lLow-Wse) m D o ni 256-Assinea Lmng 1]B p D 1]8 Solutions, PA Page � 41 Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TlS — December 2022 FSUTS Model Distribution Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 142 d�,�o �-� �.,_..�, Haven at North Naples — PUDZ — TIS — December 2022 1 1 1 Collier County Transportation Element Northwest TC A and Hurricane Evacuation Routes Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 144 0��. Northwest Tranaportatlon Concurrency ,,.,,,,,e„�,,,,,,,,a �af�..�--� Management Area (TCMA) (PL-20220001042) SCHOOL IMPACT STATEMENT Collier County School District 4�gtrict Schooj� School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new yresitlentlal project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of eFr�'I �aI the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional 1 � documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Collier Cour Department at 239-377-0267. Please check of application request (one only): [X] School Capacity Review [ ]Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, I. Project Information: Project Name: The Grove PUD Municipality: Collier County Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00238240001 and 00236040007 Location/Address of subject property: South of the SW quadrant of the intersection of Airport Road and Omnae Blossom Drive. Closest Major Intersection: Airport Road and Oranae Blossom Drive. II. Ownership/Agent Information: Applicant Name(s): Johnson Development Associates Inc AgentlContact Person: Robert J. "here. FAICP. PresidenVCEO/Hole Montes. Inc (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the Distdd will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 850 Encore Way. Naples. FL 34110 Telephone#: 239-254-2018 Fax: 239-254-2099 Email bobmulherelrDhmena.com I hereby certify the statements anNor information contained In this application with any attachments submittetl herewith are rue and cor ct to the best of my knowledge. Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Data irr rrevolnmm�nf Infnrmnfinn Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Urban— Mixed Ux District, Proposed Land Ux Designation: Airport Carlisle Mixed Urban Residential Subdistdct Use Subdistrict Current Zoning: A —Agricultural with a Condhional Use Proposed Zoning: MPUD (Res. 1996-405) allowing for a group care facility Pro ect Acrea e: 27.78t MF Total Units Current) Allowed b T e: Total Units Pro osed h T e: 334 Is this a hosed ro'ect: No If es lease com lete a e 2 of this a lication. Dateftime stamp: THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD (PL-20220001042) RESOLUTION 96-405 CONDITIONS RESOLUTION 96-405 CONDITIONS The Planning & Technical Services Manager may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional sue application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91- 102). Response: Any major changes to the site plan of The Carlisle Naples will continue to be required to go through the SDP process. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy arterial level street lighting shall be installed at project entrances. Response: Completed. Project entrances at Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive in accordance with the County's Access Management Plan shall be established to allow residents the option of accessing either Airport Road or Orange Blossom Drive. The Orange Blossom Drive entrance way shall be established at the time of Certificate of Occupancy is requested for the final building phase. Response: Completed. 4. The applicant shall be required, under the provisions of Ordinance 93-64, to provide a southbound right turn lane from Airport Road into the project. Compensating right-of-way shall be required as a consequence of the installation of this turn lane. In addition, the existing sidewalk along Airport Road shall be reconstructed to a location and grade which will facilitate storm water runoff. These improvements will be made when requested by Collier County. Response: Completed. 5. As part of the Airport Road six -lane project, Orange Blossom Drive will be reconfigured to four lanes from Airport Road west to the Animal Control driveway. In addition, a new driveway entrance to serve the Italian -American Club will be located across from the Animal Control driveway. There will be a median opening at this location. Any proposed future access from this project into Orange Blossom Drive shall be required to take these proposed changes into consideration and shall be consistent with the County's then -current Access Management Policy. H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\Resubmittal\Resolution 96-405 Conditions (9-8-2022).doex Response: Completed. 6. The applicant shall be required to provide evidence of adequate drainage outfall and sufficient capacity for the project at the time of final site development approval. Response: Completed. 7. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic -free) plan for the site shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. Response: Completed. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall be presented prior to final site development plan approval. Response: Completed. H:\2022\2022026\WP\PUDZ\Resubmittal\Resolution 96-405 Conditions (9-8-2022).doex RESOLUTION 96-`40!i A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE: ESTABLISHMENT OF A GROUP CARE FACILITY CONDITIONAL USE 1116" IN THE "A" RURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.2.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY FRONTING ON THE WEST SIDE OF AIRPORT ROAD LOCATED IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulationa as are necessary for the i protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a Comprehensive zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of i Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the d•ily appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of Conditional Use 1116n of Section 2.2.2.3 in an "A" Rural Agricultural zoning district for a group care facility on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all •applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that: SEP - 31996 The petition filed by Bruce E. Tyson ASLA, of Wilson Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. representing Stuart Marcus as Trustee, or Assignee, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Uses 1116" of Section 2.2.2.3 of the "A" zoning district for a group care facility in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C") and subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planning & Technical Services Manager may approve minor changes in the location, sitting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land Development code (Ordinance No. 91-102). 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy arterial level street lighting shall be installed at project entrances. 4 3. Project entrances at Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive in accordance with the County's Access Management Plan shall be established to allow residents the option of accessing either Airport Road or Orange Blossom Drive. The Orange Blossom Drive entrance way shall be established at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for the final building phase. 4. The applicant shall be required, under the provisions of Ordinance 93-64, to provide a southbound right turn lama from Airport Road into the project. Compensating right-of-way shall be required as a consequence of the installation of this turn lane. In addition, the existing sidewalk along Airport Road shall be reconstructed to a location and Grade which will facilitate storm water runoff. These improvements will be made when requested by Collier County. 5. As part of the Airport Road six -lane project, Orange Blossom Drive will be reconfigured to four lanes from Airport Road west to the Animal Control driveway. In addition, a new driveway entrance: to serve the Italian - American Club will be located across from the Animal Control driveway. There will be a median opening at this location. Any proposed future access from this project onto Orange Blossom Drive shall be required to take these proposed changes into consideration and shall be consistent with the County's then -current Access Management Policy. SEP - 31996 6. The applicant shall be required to provide evidence of adequate drainage outfall and sufficient capacity for the project at the time of final site development approval. 7. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic -free) plan for the site shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/ construction plan approval. 8. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), and South Florida water Management District (SFWMD) shall be presented prior to final site development plan approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. Commissioner Mac'Kie offered the foregoing Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner Hancock and upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: Commissioner Mac'Kie, Commissioner Hancock, Commissioner Constantine,, NAYS: Commissioner Matthews,. and Commissioner Norris ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: ABSTENTION: Done this 3rd . — day of September _, 1996. ATTEST: DF IGHT E. BROCK,' CLERK AA VED AS TO -'FORM AND LEG t:SUFFICIENL�i _ n Z MARJORIE M. STUDENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY CU-96-10 RESOLUTION/17327 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA C. NORRIS,,-CHAIRMAN SEP - 31996 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-96-10 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.2.2.3.16 of the Land Devlopment Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes ✓ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,. -glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within istrict Yes No Based on the above findings, this co oval use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) {show d e recommended for approval DATE: � CHAIRMAN: FINDING OF FACT CHAIRMAN/17330 EXHIBIT "A" BOOB LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2. TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH. RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 NORTH 02057'30' WEST 1397.14 FEETs THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 89'08'26' WEST 100.02 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD (C.R. 31) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBEDs THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89.08'26' WEST 602.51 FEETt THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89.08'26' WEST 646.53 FEETs THENCE NORTH 02'41'03" WEST 972.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE, THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89.12*27" EAST 584.37 FEETs THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 02156'50' EAST 660.18 FEET, THENCE NORTH @9'12'27" EAST 660.26 FEET TO THE SAID NEST RIGHT OF WAY L,NE OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD$ THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 02.56'50` EAST 311.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNINGS CONTAINING 17.8 ACRES MORE OR LESS, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. l BOOK 000 r."•c .� i M i Cl.. W x..sr LMO use suiniLSY WK v surm 10 10 r �tG 10 PROPOSED ACLF 15 116 00 OR 86 LOU* A - On^ MA yr( ♦a(A 17.0 K 17r4IJ,a Aa(A ra.i K i b11i[ AalC/1 r.a K W r.rra,c Lf K L"t �t 0Kx I tVr'ttri ! rorr wtc IMa t T.0K wren)" awn awu KkwTr 16.6 wra,/KK CO wt +. our Frwr,,, Malf'. t.r.rU rAwe0crcrr WE$ J..c SNOv0 fRtYSTM►tJ rvar0aca a.o w,r K wDWKO 10 rcct 1M+tt7 atowtr.mn tu.wo ruarun rcwrtnro. i.or ta,arc rKpacl w art ra MCAtt • vau.Ki c+nca me can me "0"*ry r, .ar 01 y -+uaw6 O CKOSI 9rAKft.O T 0-1 O N CO KK:a MY Yn0 Obdrat a1017 ro v( C t w "vo 0iav+t w M rv�vec. . - Onm I. - onw W aVttR tx.ia' un r�� ur o rca r_. { ao�no Kttss aC1 wiLSON MILLER BARTON do PEEK INC. Plorrrdnp . t Londseops kch4f[1Wr Division � t•�.�r fr+w 4�A.••.r t....r rr,o. f....w rrww rr��+ i E- Z ~ ER VJ 1 oZ t} U } L�1 .r J rr fnn6lt�' avb- r •rr r ae.a r fr 4• +na iR (PL-20220001042) CocuSgn Envelope ID:61]B90F3-38C]-0Me-ABCt-FEA22EEA29B5 JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. rattnfnepna:oecmnp October 28, 2022 Mr. Orsie Anthony 2373 Anthony Court Naples, Florida 34109 RE: Proposed Haven of North Naples Development Multifamily Residential Apartment Project Dear Mr. Anthony, Ple/asle�s�ign below if you/s/up//p�/ort ofnour�proposed development. LPL-A.A�1A Ili(i�... Mr.OrsieAnthony �CJ Thank you, I , vn nN U. Pkl uu,. Kerryann Wilson Regional Director of Florida, Multifamily Division Attachments: preliminary site plan, aerial photo pocueign Envelope In: 03F1BA30.BC1Bi2aF-B3A0-SOA9nE4302fi2 JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. Tarr ormejonn.:ancmap October 28, 2022 Mr. Sylvester Cotton 2337 Anthony Court Naples, Florida 34109 RE: Proposed Haven of North Naples Development Multifamily Residential Apartment Project Dear N As you projec7 resider to you from tl We wil home; Please sjgn gcjow ifyou support of our proposed development `MF. SyIO�ster Cotton � � (/ G Thank you, I�r wrlArau. (Ah(snN. Kerryann Wilson Regional Director of Florida, Multifamily Division Attachmenss: preliminary site plan, aerial photo