CLB Minutes 09/19/2007 R
September 19, 2007
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE
CONTRACTOR LICENSING BOARD
Naples, Florida
September 19, 2007
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Contractor Licensing
Board in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in
Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with
the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Les Dickson (Absent)
Acting Chairman: Richard Joslin
Sydney Blum
Michael Boyd
Eric Guite' (Absent)
Glenn Herriman
Lee Horn (Absent)
Ann Keller
William Lewis (Absent)
ALSO PRESENT:
Patrick Neale, Attorney to the Board
Robert Zachary, Assistant County Attorney
Tom Bartoe, Licensing Compliance Officer
Michael Ossorio, Contractor Licensing Supervisor
Page 1
AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD
DATE: WEDNESDAY - SEPTEMBER 19, 2007
TIME: 9:00 A.M.
W. HARMON TURNER BUILDING
(ADMINISTRATION BUILDING)
COURTHOUSE COMPLEX
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
I. ROLL CALL
II. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS:
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
DATE: July 18, 2007
V. DISCUSSION:
VI. NEW BUSINESS:
Dora Goren - Review of experience affidavits for Floor Covering.
John Aldrich - Review of credit report.
Joseph A. lafomaro - Review of contractor related misdemeanor.
VII. OLD BUSINESS:
VIII PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Case #2007 -09
Case #2007-10
Case #2007-11
IX. REPORTS:
X. NEXT MEETING DATE:
Samuel Greenwood
d/b/a Greenwood, Inc.
Scott Perry
d/b/a A+ Air Condo & Heating of SW Florida, Inc.
Douglas Scott White
d/b/a Guardian Technologies of SW Florida
THURSDAY OCTOBER 18, 2007
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CENTER
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE, ROOMS 609-610
NAPLES, FL 34104
September 19, 2007
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Sorry for the delay, ladies and
gentlemen, but we've got a problem with the group here.
As it stands, I'd like to call to order the Collier County
Contracting Licensing Board meeting for September 19th, and advise
everyone that anyone who decides to appeal a decision of this board
will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes that testimony and evidence upon an (sic)
appeal is to be based.
With that in mind, I'd like to start with roll call starting to my
right.
MR. HERRIMAN: Glenn Herriman.
MR. BLUM: Syd Blum.
MS. KELLER: Ann Keller.
MR. JOSLIN: Richard Joslin.
MR. BOYD: Michael Boyd.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Are there any deletions or
additions to the agenda, staff?
MR. BARTOE: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Board Members.
For the record, I'm Tom Bartoe, Collier County Licensing
Compliance Officer.
Staff has one deletion. Actually it's a continuation. Case No.
2007 -11 will be continued until the October meeting. And I have no
other deletions. I don't know if Mr. Ossorio does or not.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Mr. Ossorio?
MR. OSSORIO: Good morning, Mr. Chairman. For the record,
Michael Ossorio, Collier County Contracting Licensing Supervisor.
Weare in a time constraint, so we are going to postpone Case
No. 2007-10, which is Scott Perry, doing business as A Plus Air
Conditioning and Heating of Southwest Florida.
Case 2007-09, Samuel Greenwood, d/b/a Greenwood
Incorporated, that is going to be on short notice. I will talk to the
Page 2
September 19,2007
complainants within the next few minutes. But right now we're ready
to proceed with new business.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: All right, I need a motion for
approval of the new agenda.
MR. BLUM: So moved, Blum.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Motion and seconded (sic)--
MR. HERRIMAN: Second, Herriman.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: All in favor?
MR. HERRIMAN: Aye.
MR. BLUM: Aye.
MS. KELLER: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Aye.
MR. BOYD: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Also we need approval for the
minutes dated July 18th of 2007.
MR. BLUM: So moved, Blum.
MR. JOSLIN: Second?
MS. KELLER: Second.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: All in favor?
MR. HERRIMAN: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Aye.
MR. BLUM: Aye.
MS. KELLER: Aye.
MR. BOYD: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Any opposed?
(No response.)
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Motion carries.
New business. Is there a Dora (sic) Goren here, please?
MS. GOREN: Right here.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Yes, would you please come
up to the podium.
Ms. Goren, you were here I think months or several months ago
Page 3
September 19,2007
regarding carpentry license; is that correct?
MS. GOREN: No, I was never here. I applied for an application
for a flooring contractor's license.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: All right, would you like to
explain to us your reason for being here, then?
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
MS. GOREN: I am here today because my initial licensing or
application was denied based on a -- one reference that I believe was
misunderstood by the hearing board officer, or whoever reviewed the
original application.
I have a letter here that I had sent to the board, and I think it best
describes what happened.
In regards to the above-referenced hearing, I was denied initial
licensing based on a verification of construction experience,
completed by Mr. Barry with WB Construction. As I told Mike, the
licensing reviewer, there was obviously a misunderstanding with the
conversation he and Mr. Barry had in regards to the document that Mr.
Barry signed, which was the application of verification of construction
expenence.
Me and my partner, Chad LaFlamme, who I'm still partners with,
did flooring in several of Mr. Barry's preconstruction and existing
homes several years ago. Chad has always been the contact person for
Mr. Barry, so I believe he assumed that the verification of construction
experience was for Mr. LaFlamme and not myself.
Although me and Chad have been partners for years and he's
more experienced than me, I'm an experienced flooring installer and
have been installing floors for several years.
I feel that Mike has basically discriminated against me by
denying my license based on Mr. Barry's conversation with him.
Since I am female, he assumed that I didn't do the work myself, and he
even implied that Mr. LaFlamme take the test himself and apply for
licensing instead of myself. I don't see the reason for this, since I'm
Page 4
September 19,2007
fully capable of installing flooring and I've been doing it for several
years.
Mr. Barry has contacted him since to try to explain the
misunderstanding, but it's my understanding they have not spoken.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: How many years have you
been doing flooring?
MS. GOREN: About seven years.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Seven years? How many
companies have you worked for?
MS. GOREN: Several different companies.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: As an employee of the
company?
MS. GOREN: I've been working under general contractors and
builders as a subcontractor.
MR. BLUM: I see that -- I can understand why Mr. Ossorio
flagged it from Mr. Barry's comments. I see a Mark Howell, Hunter
Tile and Marble.
MS. GOREN: Yes.
MR. BLUM: He gives you a glowing reference. Evidently that --
he says you've been seven or eight years in that -- tile installing, wood
installing and all prep work.
So to you and to Michael, does one offset the other, Michael, or
what?
MR. OSSORIO: Yeah, I have no objections of Mrs. Goren
receiving a floor covering license. I think she's missing the point why
she's here today.
Under the code, it tells you that if you are unable to make a
decision or if there is a -- falsifying any information provided herein
may subject your license to be revocations (sic).
In other words, the application, if you look on the top of Page
No.8, I guess it's Page 8 under William Berry. It says application
name. And it has her name on there. But Mr. Berry said he was
Page 5
September 19,2007
actually writing it for Chad. So that put a red flag into the system. I'm
not saying that she's not going to receive a license, it's just that it gets
forwarded to the licensing board for further review.
Anyone knows if you go to Lee County, every single applicant
goes to the licensing board. Collier County, it's up to the contracting
licensing supervisor. If it meets all criteria, everything has been
completed, I will proceed with the license.
Unfortunately, if you look at this verification of construction
experience, the applicant's name is yourself, but Mr. Berry said he
specifically wanted it for Chad. Not saying that you don't have the
expenence.
If you look on the second page it says okay, MGO, which is my
initials. But since my initial call was to Mr. Berry, this application
wasn't filled out properly, it gets forwarded to the licensing board. No
matter if you're a female, male or whatever it may be. That's what we
stated to you and that's what we stated to the building director.
MS. GOREN: Okay.
MR. OSSORIO: And I recommend this license. However, you
should explain to the board why your name wasn't put on the top and
then why did Chad assume it was for -- why did Mr. Berry assume it
was for Chad. That's what you need to explain to the licensing board.
MS. GOREN: I know that he assumed it was for Chad because
Chad is the contact person with him, or has been when we work
together. So that's probably why he assumed it was for Chad.
MR. BLUM: So do we have your assurances that you in fact
physically can do the work, do do the work, you get down on your
hands and knees, you lay the floor out, you do the thing --
MS. GOREN: Yeah.
MR. BLUM: -- you have all that competency and--
MS. GOREN: Yes, I do.
MR. BLUM: Okay, that's all I need to know.
MS. KELLER: I had a question about your credit report. I'm
Page 6
September 19,2007
having trouble understanding it. Can you talk a little bit about your
credit report?
MS. GOREN: Where would you like me to start? I've got a lot of
things on my credit that I'm paying on. I haven't been late on
anything.
MS. KELLER: I see two charge-offs, three collections.
MS. GOREN: The collection might have been medical, but
they've all been paid off. They were before, when I was 18.
MS. KELLER: And something that says high risk fraud alert,
which I've never seen before.
MS. GOREN: I've never seen that before either. And I've looked
at my credit like a month -- less than a month ago and it did not have
that on there. And I don't know why they would -- I'm not a credit
bureau, but I've never been in trouble for any fraud or ever had
anything to do with anything like that. So I don't understand what that
would mean. I'm not a credit report -- you know, I'm not experienced
at that.
MS. KELLER: Does anybody -- can anybody help me with this?
Because I can't really interpret it.
MR. BLUM: It's one of the highest alerts that they have. And it
is something to be concerned with. And were I Dara, I would
certainly want an explanation, as by law they have to provide you.
Because that sends up not one but about 15 flags for us, quite frankly.
MS. GOREN: I didn't even know that was on there. Last time I
looked at my credit, it wasn't on it.
Can you tell me what credit bureau has put that on? Because I
know there's three different credit bureaus. I mean, you would think
they would have to inform me.
MS. KELLER: It's really hard for us, because every single one
of these that we get, it looks different and has different interpretations.
And so, you know, when I looked at it last night, I --
MS. GOREN: Can I see a copy of it?
Page 7
September 19, 2007
MS. KELLER: -- I didn't really understand. This was prepared
by Mortgage Solutions.
MR. NEALE: And there's an 800 number on there that says for
any questions requiring creditor reporting services.
MS. GOREN: Mortgage Solutions.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: It appears, though, that the
mortgage people or the actual credit report came from Experian,
Transunion and Equifax, which are three of the largest. Those are the
three ones that have reported this.
MR. BLUM: But Mortgage Solutions is the one that put the high
alert on it.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Right.
MS. GOREN: They -- I don't even have any debts with them, so
I don't understand how they --
MR. BLUM: Did you apply for credit to buy a house possibly
recently?
MS. GOREN: I've been looking into refinancing, and I have
talked to Mortgage Solutions, but I've never done anything with them.
MR. BLUM: How long ago?
MS. GOREN: Within the last I would say month or month and a
half.
MR. BLUM: Okay. That coincides with our situation with the
planning industry in especially Florida. And in my experience,
something like that, Mortgage Solutions feels that this young lady's
guidelines don't meet their criteria, and for them to issue the mortgage
they think she's a high risk alert. That wouldn't bother me, just
knowing the market as I do.
MS. GOREN: Yeah, 1--
MR. BLUM: You applied for refinance and they didn't feel you
met their guidelines. And what their guidelines are, none of our -- so I
wouldn't have a problem with that.
MS. GOREN: I've applied with several other companies for
Page 8
September 19,2007
refinance too, as you will probably see on there.
MR. BLUM: Yeah, I would definitely contact them --
MS. GOREN: Okay.
MR. BLUM: -- and make them aware.
MS. GOREN: I can't believe--
MR. BLUM: That's really -- they shouldn't have placed that kind
of thing on a credit report, because it does send up flags. And if we
didn't have experience in a real estate market and especially lending
institutions, that might scare a lot of people. You need to address that.
MS. GOREN: I need to get that taken off. I'm glad you brought
that to my attention. Because I wasn't even aware that just because
you apply for something they can put something on your credit like
that.
MR. BLUM: Yes, they can. They can do it. And my suggestion
is that you might want to have an attorney write a letter. Just for some
-- you know.
MS. GOREN: Okay, thank you.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: One last thing. On this same
credit report, next page, there's another entry in here for a mortgage
that you have for $344,000? Am I reading this correctly?
MS. GOREN: Yes, probably. Yes, I have a mortgage.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: And an automobile for
$53,000?
MS. GOREN: Urn-hum. Oh, does it say 53? Because it should
be 36. Is it Infiniti Financing?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Fifty-three balance is what
they're showing. And change.
MS. GOREN: Wow. It's Infiniti?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I'm not sure exactly. It says
automobile.
MS. GOREN: I'll have to look into that.
MR. BLUM: If it's a lease, they'll show the original price. They
Page 9
September 19,2007
won't show the balance of the lease.
MS. GOREN: It's not a lease.
MR. BLUM: It's not. It should be the correct amount.
MR. HERRIMAN: Well, I think what they did is they lumped
the automobile and the recreational vehicle. Do you have a camper or
something?
MS. GOREN: I have two four-wheelers.
MR. BLUM: There you go. That's what it is then. And they're
all financed the same place?
MS. GOREN: Well, both were financed with Honda Financing,
and then my car was financed with Infiniti.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: That's what it is.
MR. BLUM: Yeah, that explains it.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: What's the pleasure of the
board? Any ideas?
MR. BLUM: Are we done with the discussion part?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: If you would like to quiz her
anymore, you can, sure.
MR. BLUM: I'd like to make a recommendation, if it's in order.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay. Help yourself.
MR. BLUM: I like this young lady's presentation, and I'm
inclined to work with her. I would suggest a period of review by the
contractor licensing office, just to kind of have an overview for a
period of time.
There are some things, even though it appears to be settled, that I
would like to have a little bit of an overview for a while.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Probation period?
MR. BLUM: Yeah.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: How long?
MR. BLUM: Six months?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Any other comments on it?
(No response.)
Page 10
September 19,2007
MR. BLUM: I'll make a motion, if nobody disagrees.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: You can see our dilemma here.
Because of the credit report that we're looking at and the falsification
of the paperwork that we got -- received already, it's a little bit iffy for
us to grant your license on those terms. But Mr. Blum has made a
suggestion and I think the board will probably be able to go along with
that for a six-month period, but you'll be monitored for sure.
MS. GOREN: Okay. So it's like six months --
MR. BLUM: Probationary period. So if Mr. Ossorio's office for
any reason feels that there's a problem resulting from the things we've
brought up today, he can shut you down.
MS. GOREN: Okay.
MR. BLUM: Without coming to us, he can just do it.
MS. GOREN: Okay. But you'll just inform me?
MR. BLUM: Mr. Ossorio's the man.
MS. GOREN: Okay.
MR. BLUM: We're going to make a decision today; we're going
to put it in his hands. That's between you and him. Keep a nice
relationship. I don't think he believes in any harassment or any
violating any of your rights. He's not that kind of guy. I think you'll
find --
MS. KELLER: I've been on this board for five years, I can tell
you that.
MR. BLUM: -- he's a very fair and even-handed kind of a guy.
We have a lot of faith in Mr. Ossorio.
MS. GOREN: Okay.
MR. BLUM: So I'll make an official recommendation then. I
recommend that we -- a motion to approve Dara Green (sic), is it?
MS. GOREN: Goren.
MR. BLUM: Goren's application with a provision for a
six-month probationary period monitored by the contracting licensingsupervISOr.
Page 11
September 19, 2007
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I'll second the motion.
I have a motion and a second on the floor. All in favor of the
motion?
MR. BLUM: Aye.
MR. HERRIMAN: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Aye.
MS. KELLER: Aye.
MR. BOYD: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Motion carries.
MS. GOREN: And I will try to get that taken off my credit
report immediately, because I think that was justly unfair for them to
do that.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Please.
And by the way, for all those listening, also the paperwork that
you're going to need to carry this through will be down at the county
at Horseshoe Drive. But all that's here right now, so you'll be able to
pick that up probably until (sic) tomorrow.
MS. GOREN: Okay. So I can just basically leave and then go
back -- come back and pick up my paperwork tomorrow in Horseshoe.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Yes, Horseshoe Drive. And
see the powers to be in there will set you up.
MS. GOREN: Okay, thank you.
MR. BLUM: Good luck.
MS. GOREN: Thank you.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Next case. Do we have a John
Aldrich here?
MR. ALDRICH: Yes, sir.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Would you please come to the
podium to be sworn in.
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Mr. Aldrich, would you like to
I guess explain the reason why you're here? Other than the fact I know
Page 12
___"___.._ ""n__"_~'___~_,_,_,~_",_,_~._~ __. '___'_'_'__'~_~'_~._'_'~'_"____'_'~__"""___'~'_.'_"_....__.,,~..,..__""_...._,"_.~.______.
September 19,2007
we're going to review your credit report.
MR. ALDRICH: Yes, sir. I'm a painting contractor that's
licensed in several counties in the state, which it's unfortunate that
there is no state-wide license for a painting contractor. Each county
has its county specific licensing.
My business was founded 15 years ago. We primarily serve the
municipal water and wastewater industry throughout the Southeast
United States.
We were very successful the first 10 years of business, but in
2004 and 2005 we experienced a lot of problems. Some problems
were foreseen, some problems were not. Over the years we've grown
up to 100 employees and got a little bit out of control as far as having
-- I'm sure you can understand, having too many people at one time.
We were hit with a bunch of -- because most of our work is
water/wastewater, a lot of it's environmentally sensitive. So the five
hurricanes within two years took a toll on our profits for those two
years.
And that same year in 2005 we were hit with a hurricane in Key
West when we were doing four, five million gallon tank interiors.
And the backlash of Wilma flooded one of the tanks and we sustained
over $350,000 of losses on that job, and we were only able to recover
$50,000 for media loss through our insurance company because we
wasn't carrying flood insurance for the job.
At that same year we got our visit from the Department of
Environmental Protection, or -- yeah, Florida FDEP at our shop, and
there was accusations that we were burying paint on our property.
And we successfully -- we successfully dealt with that, and that was a
toll on us for about $335,000, which left us in a bad position in 2005
to where we had -- we were under constraints with a consent order
from DEP to pay them off and to pay off the other -- the legal fees and
all.
And we just had so much debt in 2005 that we had to work with
Page 13
September 19,2007
the primary vendors and the secondary vendors and make priorities to
keep the business alive.
I believed in the business, because we always carried a great deal
of backlog of work. Because of dealing with water/wastewater it's a
year out for the work, so we knew we had several million dollars of
work on the books, and we knew we could recover from it. And I'm
just too stubborn and I don't believe that I should just bankrupt it
because if -- I knew that I could recover it in two years.
So mostly everything on my credit report -- everything on my
credit report on my business all relates to losses that's occurred in
2005. All of those things that's on there has been satisfied, the
vendors have been paid, and I have proof of all the thing. In other
words, either they've been paid or -- I mean, they've all been paid.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: So just I guess a silly question:
Coming from my understanding here, you have about four different
counties that you work in?
MR. ALDRICH: Actually I work throughout the state.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: So you work in a lot of
different counties.
MR. ALDRICH: Yes, sir.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: What brings you to Naples,
Florida? Collier County.
MR. ALDRICH: Quite often the City of Naples has wanted a
water -- one of my largest customers that I think you'll see in the
reference letter there is a company called Crom Corporation. Crom
Corporation builds pre-stressed concrete tanks. I have a specialty in
rehab in those tanks, so I've worked in Collier County before, and
Collier County will order us a job to come down to do -- rehab one of
their tanks.
So about 80 percent of the work I do is usually through a general
contractor, but I do have work from time to time where I'm contracted
direct from the City of Naples or Collier County.
Page 14
September 19, 2007
So, you know, I just -- I don't have our shop here. In other
words, I'm not doing business with the public. I'm not ever going to
do business with the public. You know, I'm just -- I'm here because I
rehab water tanks. Then whenever you have one, you know, I get it
done and my business goes back.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: How many employees do you
employ right now?
MR. ALDRICH: About 52.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: In the packet I see a couple of
things. Number one is a competency card from Hillsborough County
MR. ALDRICH: Yes, sir.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: -- where it shows Workmen's
Comp expired on 1/1 of'07.
MR. ALDRICH: We have a Workmen's Comp -- I can get you a
new certificate, sir.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Also I have a license from
Brevard County that expired on 8/31 of '07.
MR. ALDRICH: Well, we might have a -- this thing's been on
the docket for a few months. It might have some transit --
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: It is?
MR. ALDRICH: Yeah.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Do you know ifhe's active on
that one, current?
MR. OSSORIO: I have no idea. That's something we'll look into
when we do a review.
Mr. Chairman, the other thing I had a question on, on page
number three, that's why he was actually here. I looked at his credit
report. He is making a good faith effort.
But this one is -- unfortunately it doesn't give me a little latitude.
He -- his deposition is still pending, top of the page, number three.
Maybe Mr. Aldrich can go ahead and maybe elaborate on that.
Page 15
September 19, 2007
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Top of page number three.
MR. OSSORIO: Page number three of your --
MR. ALDRICH: Personal or business?
MR. OSSORIO: Just says page number three.
MR. BOYD: I don't have a page number three.
MR. HERRIMAN: Keep going. It's pretty deep.
MS. KELLER: Find it?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Yeah.
You're talking the credit report, correct?
MR. OSSORIO: Yeah. After the resolution.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I found it.
MR. OSSORIO: Okay. Top of the page.
MR. ALDRICH: I have two page number three. I'm sorry, I don't
have a copy of it in front of me.
MS. KELLER: Are you talking about the case? E.R.I.S.A.?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: There's two page number
threes in the packet.
MR. OSSORIO: Sorry about that. Here you go.
MR. ALDRICH: Okay. The -- we have a -- we're a union -- we
are an open shop. We're not under contract with any -- at this time
we're not under contract with the union. And when this whole 2005
thing happened, the union just basically got nervous and came in and
did an audit on the company. They have a -- when the union comes
and does an audit, they have some terminology in there that they feel
that they're due benefits for any union employees and non-union
employees.
We have an agreement inside the union agreement that said that
we have a utility work clause for six months of the employment to
where we don't have to pay fringes on that employee.
The union has agreed to come in and review all the employees
that were not union and that were union, and only the funds which
have already been paid and on the actual union members. However,
Page 16
September 19,2007
it's in their hands. That's how come it says we have an agreement that
it's stayed, because they haven't come to do any -- they were supposed
to give us a list of all the members that's active so that we can compare
that to all the people we've paid in on, so then -- you know, and they
haven't done anything.
So there's nothing -- I mean, as far as I'm concerned, the ball's in
their court on that. And it's been out for two years, almost.
So we still employ union employees, we still pay fringes and
pension on union employees, they still ship us employees, but they
just filed this to protect theirself (sic), I think.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Mr. Ossorio, what do you
make of this? Do you have a comment on this?
MR. OSSORIO: I think that this company has been hurt
financially for a couple of years. I think he does have a license
throughout most of the county. And I don't have a problem with him
working for a government agency. I believe he's stipulated the fact
that he would only contract with a government agency, not with a --
you know, a consumer.
If that's something we can do, Robert Zachary, I have no idea.
Could we hold the company only to contract with a government
agency, not with a consumer or a taxpayer?
MR. ZACHARY: I think as a condition of granting a license this
board could -- if the applicant accepts that, this board could make that
stipulation on the granting of the license.
MR. ALDRICH: Absolutely. I have no intentions of conducting
business with the homeowners, or for that matter even commercial
entities. I'm just a -- I'm a municipal contractor. Been that all my life.
MS. KELLER: Well, that kind of makes me think of the phrase,
if it doesn't kill you it will make you stronger.
Do you get insurance now for --
MR. ALDRICH: Yes, ma'am. We have $5 million of coverage.
MS. KELLER: But for the flood insurance for what you're
Page 17
September 19, 2007
working on, or after you had this --
MR. ALDRICH: Yes, we did.
MS. KELLER: -- incidence, or was it just one time? It's a
business decision, I'm not asking for --
MR. ALDRICH: Because the job was in Key West, the
deductibles, we try to get builders risk, but the deductible is a half
million dollars. So the loss was greater than -- the loss was less than
the deductible on the builders risk insurance for that job.
Yes, we've now looked into better ways of covering jobs. We
would have never thought -- we thought we had insurance for the
hurricane damage. The problem what happened, if you can picture
this, you can picture a tank the size of a football field. The job was bid
prior to the gas crunch. So we were planning on bringing the media in
from Miami to the job and disposing of it in Key Largo like
everything's supposed to be done.
Well, when the gas crunch hit the fuel went up and so therefore
the freight and the shipping to get the media from Miami to Key West
was like triple in cost. So we had to use a media called Steel Grit,
which is a media that you recycle over and over and over.
Well, what happened, the media is very expensive. On one tank
you spend about $50,000 in media. Well, the media was inside the--
we put all the media inside -- the job was ongoing. We put all the
media inside the tank, thinking that was the safest place because of
wind damage and stuff.
And what happened, the reason they covered the 48,000, because
that damage was caused to (sic) the hurricane for wind damage. But
what happened, the storm surge actually filled the tank with six foot of
water and all the media was ruined, not to mention all the media that
when the blasting was going on was on the ground and all the rust to
the floor. We spent three months chiseling andjackhammering up all
the media off the floor to get it back up to where we could sandblast to
finish the job.
Page 18
September 19, 2007
MS. KELLER: Sounds like now you know what you're doing.
MR. ALDRICH: Oh, yeah. Well, I thought--
MS. KELLER: Leave it outside. You have hurricane insurance.
MR. ALDRICH: Yes, ma'am.
MR. BLUM: In order to move this along--
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Yeah, let's move it along.
MR. BLUM: Obviously this company has made some
catastrophically bad business decisions. Some they could have
prevented and some not. And hindsight's always better than foresight.
It's obviously a company who is trying to do the right thing. I
agree with Mr. Ossorio, they are paying their debts. I'd be very
concerned if they were dealing with any kind of a consumer, even a
local subcontractor on a lesser scale.
So if we could be assured that they're only going to deal with
high-end commercial people, i.e, the city, which is going to have a lot
of oversight, or the county agency, I'd go along with Mr. Ossorio's
recommendation.
MS. KELLER: Second.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Is that in the form of a motion?
MR. BLUM: That would be in the form of a motion, should you
desire.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Also, I'd like to make just one
interjection also, that he be monitored for this situation with the union
situation that's going on now, because that's a pending case.
Something could come out of this, I'm sure, and it could probably take
hold of your business and you wouldn't be in business any longer.
MR. ALDRICH: We actually have a -- we don't have a -- we
have an agreement that we are -- we are waiting for their numbers, and
we have an agreement that we're honoring just to keep things going
with them. That's probably why they're not -- that's probably why
they haven't done anything, because we're continuing just dealing with
them and doing business with them for -- and I don't want to say I'm
Page 19
September 19,2007
an expert with union relations either, because I'm not, but I know that
the union needs guys like me that will hire and entertain their people
in Florida.
So we feel that they are wanting to work with us and do whatever
they can to continue to keeping their membership alive and people
employed. And that's -- you know, we want to work with them, but
we just don't feel it's fair if we ask for employees and they don't send
us any and we have to recruit and find our own employees that they
turn around and want us to pay $5.00 an hour in for them. You know,
we just didn't feel that was appropriate, you know, for them to ask for.
So they've agreed. And like I stated in review, that they would
only make us pay in on our long-term employees that's beyond the
probationary period, and in turn they wouldn't make us pay in only
union people they shipped us but actually aren't union members.
Because if they don't stay in the union, they're not union members and
therefore they shouldn't have benefits paid in.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay, that will work.
MR. ALDRICH: Okay, thank you.
MR. ZACHARY: Mr. Joslin --
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: You agree to the motion,
right?
MR. BLUM: Yes.
MR. ZACHARY: If! could just interject one more time, we do
have precedence for granting limited licenses, but I wanted you all to
make sure that what we're talking about is government entities,
probably some private utilities, since we have some of those. And he
said high-end commercial, I think that would open it up for shopping
centers or whatever commercial buildings there might be, so I don't
know whether you want to do that.
MR. BLUM: I have a problem with that personally. Because
you're talking about a lot of credit risk now with a high-end shopping
center with --
Page 20
September 19,2007
MR. ZACHARY: I think you're talking about--
MR. BLUM: -- private developers.
MR. ZACHARY: -- primarily utilities and government entities.
MR. BLUM: Yes.
MR. ALDRICH: That's typical to me.
MR. BLUM: That would be my thrust on it.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Would you modify the motion
MR. BLUM: Yes.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: -- to explain that?
MR. BLUM: I would modify my motion to accept this
gentleman's application, as long as his contracts are not go (sic)
beyond the scope of government agencies or public utilities. With--
MR. ZACHARY: And there are private utilities as well.
MR. BLUM: Or private utilities, yes.
And it's assuming that Mr. Ossorio will closely monitor the
operations as well.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: And we need a second?
MS. KELLER: Second. Sorry.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: We've got a motion and a
second on the floor. All in favor of the motion?
MR. HERRIMAN: Aye.
MR. BLUM: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Aye.
MS. KELLER: Aye.
MR. BOYD: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Any opposed?
(No response.)
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Motion carries.
MR. ALDRICH: Thank you.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: You're welcome, and good
luck to you.
Page 21
September 19, 2007
Once again, remember that you can't pick up any part of the
application for the license until tomorrow.
MR. ALDRICH: I can come back next week.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Yeah. Maybe later this
afternoon, but next week for sure.
MR. ALDRICH: I'm going back to Lakeland, so -- okay, thank
you.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Have a good day.
Moving right along to Joseph Iafornaro. Did I say it right?
MR. IAFORNARO: Yes, you pronounced that correctly.
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Mr. Iafornaro, could you
please explain to us why you are here today?
MR. IAFORNARO: I've applied for a Collier County carpentry
license, and it was brought to my attention that because I had a recent
contracting related misdemeanor case in the Collier court, that I had to
apply to the board.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay, that is absolutely
correct.
Would you like to explain the reasons of the case?
MR. IAFORNARO: Well, I don't really want to go into the
details of it, unless you require me to --
MR. BLUM: Yeah, we do.
MR. IAFORNARO: -- but I have satisfied the case. It's been
totally settled and released and finalized.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Correct.
According to the packet that we have here in front of us, you
were given the opportunity at one point to rectify the situation of the
case that you were taken to court for, and at that time you refused, in
which case you were taken to court and found guilty?
MR.IAFORNARO: Well, no. From advice from my attorney--
Jerry Berry's office was representing me in this case. And he
Page 22
September 19,2007
suggested that I take a plea. And as a result, the charge was a
conviction. But the -- but it was left open for a separate restitution
hearing, and that was a separate deliberation. And Michael Hopkins
was representing me on that. And it came out to a judgment of a
restitution. And then I've since settled the judgment.
MS. KELLER: You have a number of collections on your credit
report. Is there -- that just concerns me as somebody who's running a
business that there are so many even small collections that seem to
have not been dealt with.
MR.IAFORNARO: Well, I -- it's not that I can't and haven't or
don't intend to. I have been taking care of some of my small debts. In
its entirety my full debt for the last eight years or whatnot might total
$5,000.
But I currently have reasonably good credit and I have satisfied
many of my various things on my credit, and intend to rectify the rest
of my credit. I'm in the process of working on it. Not to mention the
fact that I probably incurred 15 or $20,000 worth oflegal expenses
this year.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Why were those legal
expenses necessary?
MR. IAFORNARO: Well, some of them were related to this
particular case, but not totally.
MR. BLUM: Part of our mandate is to look out for the concerns
for the citizens of Collier County. Personally I have a problem with a
contractor who has more than one or numerous collection problems
with people he's doing business with in Collier County.
MR. IAFORNARO: In may, sir?
MR. BLUM: Sure.
MR. IAFORNARO: I've never had a collection problem with
anybody who I've conducted business with in Collier County. But
more importantly --
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I have to go and ask the
Page 23
September 19,2007
question then. She said the statement. The case that you were
convicted on, was this not a contracting case where you had done
work for a homeowner and you were --
MR. IAFORNARO: As a licensed handyman.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: As a licensed handyman.
MR. IAFORNARO: Yes. Yeah, I'm a registered LLC. I'm a
licensed handyman. I have liability insurance and --
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Mr. Ossorio, can you explain
to the board members possibly what a licensed handyman is allowed
to do and the dollar value that it's placed upon per job?
MR. OSSORIO: There is a handyman exemption under Statute
489, anything under $1,000 or inconsequential work.
Collier County, we don't have a handyman license. We have
what you call a maintenance license. It is a tax -- it's called a business
receipt tax. We used to call it, quote, the occupational license.
This particular case, unfortunately this gentleman contracted with
a homeowner over at King's Lake Boulevard. And I don't want to tell
you, but obviously it was extensive work, way over $1,000, and not
considered a handyman item. And this is why he was probably
convicted.
Other than that, I have some questions about his credit, I have
some questions about his experience. You can review his experience
letters. And also, his being convicted as a misdemeanor, working
without a license, that has some bearing on it, too.
MR. BLUM: One of my questions is we're here to ostensibly
review a contract related misdemeanor; however we're now going
afield and looking at other things in the packet.
Do we only rule on the merits of this acceptance based on the
misdemeanor, or can we feel free to --
MR. NEALE: No, when an application is brought to this board,
everything within the application is within the purview of the board at
that time. Because when the contractor licensing supervisor refers it to
Page 24
September 19,2007
the board, it's for a review of the application.
MR. BLUM: Whatever field we can use.
MR. NEALE: In whole it may focus on the credit report, but
certainly everything there becomes, for lack of a better term, fair
game.
MR. BLUM: As Mrs. Keller mentioned, then, there's 18
accounts with delinquency, but there's 38 serious delinquency and
public record or collections filed.
It's been a long time since I've seen that number of situations with
one small contractor. Talk about flags.
MS. KELLER: We see some big numbers of delinquencies and,
you know, people who have filed for bankruptcy or whatever, but
these are small numbers that --
MR. BLUM: It's a lot of people.
MS. KELLER: -- need to be cleaned up. They need to be taken
seriously. And if you're going to be serious as a contractor, you have
to be serious with your personal financial situation. So that's my
feeling anyway.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I have one other item that I'm
going to bring up, only because I think this is something that the board
needs to hear. I'm not sure of how many board members are aware of
this or not.
But I'm going to go into some case law, okay, that was held in
January of '06. That was a case in which a gentleman applied for a
general contractor's license. He was convicted of a felony of a crime
that had nothing to do with construction or construction related work.
In which case then he took the crime to -- or the case to the State DPR
trying to get a license to be a general contractor. And he was denied.
After a period of time they reviewed this and found out that he
could not be denied a license because he was convicted of a crime
other than a felony that had nothing to do with contracting.
In turn they did give the man a license. However, when they did,
Page 25
September 19,2007
they came into the case law and they wrote out the actual ordinance
the way it's written. I'm going to read it to you so you understand
where we're coming from.
Except as provided in 775.16, a person whose civil rights have
been restored shall not be disqualified to practice, pursue or engage in
any occupation, trade, vocation, profession or business in which a
license permit or certificate is required to be issued by the state and of
its agencies or political subdivisions or municipalities solely because
of a prior conviction of a crime.
However, a person whose civil rights have been restored may be
denied a license, permit or certification to pursue, practice or engage
in an occupation, trade, vocation, profession or business by reason of
the prior conviction for a crime if the crime was a felony or first
degree misdemeanor and directly related to a specific occupation,
trade, vocation, profession or business for which the license, permit or
certificate is sought. Meaning --
MR. IAFORNARO: I understand that.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: You understand the term?
MR. IAFORNARO: Yes. And if I may ask something. It's not
necessarily directly related to that. I do understand what you have
read.
I realize I made a mistake by contracting maybe outside of the
scope of my license as a handyman, but nevertheless I have, you
know, many years, 20 years experience working as a carpenter. I'm an
experienced carpenter, and I'm well known and appreciated for that.
And if I may impress upon the board today that it's my intent to
and desire to abide by applying to just to achieve just that in
compliance to be formal in doing and performing, you know, as a
legitimate carpenter in Collier County.
I'd also, if I may ask, if needs be that I'm on a probationary
period, in which time I will take care of my -- what's left on my credit
report. I just haven't addressed it yet because I've been so busy with
Page 26
September 19,2007
so many other things this last couple years.
And that -- I would just ask that you allow me to try to at least
advance myself in my endeavor in good intent and good faith to
perform as a carpenter in Collier County.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I'm going to go to Mr. Ossorio.
What are your recommendations, or do you have any
recommendations that you think we should be looking at?
MR. OSSORIO: Mr. Chairman, I did talk to G.W. Harold, who's
the attorney for the State Construction Licensing Board, and I asked
some guidance through his office to find out what scenario does the
construction licensing board do. And he basically didn't really give me
that much information, only to say that yes, we could give him a
license. Yes, we can put him on probation.
However, it has been known that they usually take a back seat
and deny and say come back in a year and if you work for a carpentry
company and you establish yourself, you fix your credit, whatever it
is, and there's no other problems with working without a license and
you work with a handyman, then we can proceed with that. That's the
recommendation he actually gave me.
But I don't know what to tell you other than this gentleman had
an opportunity before the lawyers got involved. We sat down in a
meeting, we explained to him about the occupational license and the
tax and the State Statute 489, and unfortunately this gentleman
decided to go the legal route. And that's exactly what happened. He
had ample time to come up with the $4,000 two years ago, but
unfortunately he wanted to go a different way, and that's fine.
But it does concern me. I mean, if it was a crime that was
committed and it was adjudicated withheld; in other words, he was
nolo contendere, I probably would probably say let's give him some
probation. However, the judge decided on his own accord to find him
guilty, with an attorney.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: A very good attorney, I might
Page 27
September 19,2007
add.
MR. OSSORIO: There had to be some circumstantial reason
why they did that. They didn't find him -- they found him guilty.
With that, I would hate to have some homeowner come into my
office two months from now saying that this gentleman did this work
without a building permit or he did some electrical work and you
knew he was a convicted person in contracting.
So that does put a red flag in my office, and that's why the board
makes those decisions.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Right. Thank you.
MR. ZACHARY: Mr. Joslin, since it's in the packet, I think the
board should be aware, I don't know whether you've read the
settlement agreement that's --
MR. BLUM: Yes.
MR. ZACHARY: -- included in the packet. I want you to note
that restitution was awarded in the amount of$17,630 and change.
The settlement agreement was $4,000 to satisfy that restitution. But if
you read the last line on the first page, it said the lump sum of $4,000
will be paid by third party, and the defendant is of limited financial
means. If you're concerned about the public, then I think you should
take this into account, as well as that credit report.
MR. NEALE: What I'd like to do is just review for the board the
standard for financial responsibility, which the board can review. And
the standard under the Florida Administrative Code, which is
incorporated in Collier County ordinances, that the applicant must
have financial responsibility, and the financial responsibility is defined
as the ability to safeguard that the public will not sustain economic
loss resulting from the contractor's inability to pay his lawful
contractual obligations.
I would point the board to both the previous conviction for him
not paying contractual obligations, and the fact that in a sworn
statement from the settlement release restitution award, that in the
Page 28
September 19, 2007
court document it says that he's limited financial means, owns no real
properties, and that he had to have the $4,000 paid by a third party.
And I would ask that the board please review all of that in
determining whether he has adequate financial responsibility.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Got you. If you're ready, I
mean -- any other comments that we want to get into? I think it's
pretty much cut-and-dry to all, but--
MR. BLUM: I think so. But in addressing Mr. Ossorio's
comments, ordinarily I'd probably go along with the come back in a
year. To me, an additional -- let's just forget about the conviction,
okay? That was a mistake and it was he said/she said and he got his
dander up and so forth. So let's forget about that.
We still got 38 other situations to me which shows a way of
doing business that's more confrontational than anything. And that
always results in problems.
You've got to get along with your customers, you've got to work
with your customers. Just being right isn't good enough. I've been
saying that forever.
My position would be to deny this, period.
MS. KELLER: Yeah, I think I'd like to see things cleared up a
little bit and maybe if you wanted to come back -- because I don't
think the case would make me feel that, you know, you couldn't be
capable, but I would like to see some effort made before I would
consider voting for approval.
MR. HERRIMAN: Do you plan to continue your handyman
work if you don't get this license today?
MR. IAFORNARO: Absolutely. I mean, I --
MR. BLUM: The lack of any additional problems resulting from
your handyman business will go a long way the next time you come
before us.
MR. IAFORNARO: When do you suggest I come back before
you?
Page 29
September 19,2007
MR. BLUM: I'd say a year.
MS. KELLER: Don't come till it's clean.
MR. IAFORNARO: And what part of the cleanliness would you
like me to clean?
MR. BLUM: No more collections, no more liens.
MR. IAFORNARO: Just my debts?
MR. BLUM: Absolutely. We want to see a guy who really cares
about his customers. That means a lot to us. The money
notwithstanding, the credit notwithstanding --
MR. IAFORNARO: I didn't bring my list of my 500 customers,
people that I've worked for for the last 25 years. I'm 43 years old. I
may not look it, but I've worked for -- you know, I must have built
100 boat docks, renovated a dozen homes. And if you would have
liked, I could have, if you had asked and put it in your criteria --
MS. KELLER: I don't think anyone's denying your abilities.
MR. IAFORNARO: Well, no, I'm just saying, if I could just
finish --
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I don't think it's necessary that
you have to get into this, because you're only putting yourself in
deeper. Now we're talking about you building boat docks and we're
talking about things that you need licenses for besides a handyman
license.
MR. IAFORNARO: Well, no, I didn't need a license to build a
boat dock in Orlando for a private friend.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: What county are you in, sir?
You are not in Orlando. You are in Collier County.
MR. IAFORNARO: I'm talking about my 25-year history --
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I understand.
MR. IAFORNARO: -- as an honest, hard-working --
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Your history in Orlando I
couldn't care about at the moment.
MR. IAFORNARO: -- is what I'm talking about. I'm not getting
Page 30
September 19,2007
personal about your county and your criteria for that. But I'm just
saying when you suggest that I need to make my customers happy, I
didn't bring in 1,000-page reference book for you to find out more
about my history. Because if you read it, you'd find that these
thousand people that would be sitting out here would testify for
themselves, and you can analyze their testimony as well if you'd like,
they all come from pretty good histories, and they would tell you how
satisfied and how competent and how pleased they were and are to
this day with my abilities and my work.
And I respect your position, but I just wanted to put -- just ad-lib
that properly for the context. And I will take care of my credit and I
will come back before you.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay, that's--
MR. BLUM: We look forward to that.
MS. KELLER: Good.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: And I think that's probably the
best thing you could do right now.
MR. IAFORNARO: Thank you.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: So we have a motion on the
floor for denial?
MR. BLUM: Yes.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: A second?
MR. BOYD: Second, Boyd.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Boyd seconded the motion.
And a second (sic) on the floor to deny this packet for a Joseph A.
Iafornaro.
All in favor?
MR. HERRIMAN: Aye.
MR. BLUM: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Aye.
MS. KELLER: Aye.
MR. BOYD: Aye.
Page 31
September 19, 2007
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Any denials?
(No response.)
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Motion carries. Thank you.
Moving on to old business, any old business that we need to
discuss? No.
Then we'll move right into public hearings. Are we going to do
any public hearings today or no?
MR. BARTOE: I don't believe so. And I believe very shortly
we should adjourn for Ms. Keller's sake.
I just want to add that if you look at the bottom of your agenda,
next week's (sic) meeting will be on a Thursday in our building on
Horseshoe Drive, Rooms 609 and 610. Thursday, October 18th.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: A Thursday, hm.
MS. BARNETT: And it should say 9:00 a.m.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: And I assume that--
MR. BLUM: Is there a reason for that, Mr. Bartoe?
MR. BARTOE: This room is not available on the normal date,
and neither was our rooms, 609, 610, so we went one day later.
MR. BLUM: It's not because of a particular contentious calendar
that requires media attention and all those good things like last time?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: WINK won't be there, in other
words?
MR. OSSORIO: Could be. I don't know.
MR. BLUM: You remember the last time we did that, it was
more than interesting.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: All right, you want to take a
short adjournment here, just to allow Mrs. Keller to take care of her
items, or do you want to try to continue this case? Are we going to do
any case now?
MR. NEALE: I would say because Mrs. Keller, she has to head
for the airport, the board would not have a quorum when it
reconvenes, so I would say that essentially you have to adjourn the
Page 32
September 19,2007
board meeting and continue the item to the next board meeting.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay.
MR. OSSORIO: Mr. Chairman, I've --
MR. NEALE: They may already have gone, so--
MR. OSSORIO: I've talked to the respondent and they're going
to go ahead and wait till October.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay, that sounds good.
MR. NEALE: I do have a question, this is personal, but -- and I
don't know if it would be inconvenient for anyone else. Is there any
way possible to schedule the meeting next month for the 16th instead
of the 18th, to make it on Tuesday?
MR. OSSORIO: I'll call you today.
MR. NEALE: If you would.
Would that inconvenience any of the board members?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: No, not me.
MR. HERRIMAN: No, it would be more convenient for me,
because I won't be here Thursday.
MR. ZACHARY: Is the 16th a BCC meeting?
MR. NEALE: It doesn't really conflict with us, though.
MR. ZACHARY: Well, if it's up there I guess it won't. But it
might with me. But you can always find somebody else to send.
MS. KELLER: All right, someone will let us know, Mike, which
day it is?
MR. OSSORIO: We will.
MS. KELLER: Okay. Do you want our e-mails so you can
e-mail us stuff?
MR. BLUM: I gave mine to Maggie. That's the only way I do it.
MS. KELLER: Does she e-mail you then?
MR. BLUM: She e-mails me every time, yeah. It helps a lot.
MR. OSSORIO: Just give it to me after the meeting, because
we're going to be adjourned in a few minutes.
MR. NEALE: That's not a BCC date, as far as I can tell, because
Page 33
September 19,2007
it's the third Tuesday instead of the second.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: All right, with that I suppose
that we need a motion to adjourn.
MR. BLUM: So moved, Blum.
MS. KELLER: Do you want to keep our packets for us for next
week?
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Shall we keep them?
MR. BARTOE: Yeah, keep those, please.
MS. KELLER: And then you'll bring them back with the other
stuff.
MR. BLUM: We should keep them.
MR. OSSORIO: Yeah, we'll take them, because last time you
took them, you didn't bring them and then we had a problem. So we
have enough hands, we can bring them back. Especially if it's going
to be in our office, it's not a big deal.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: I only have one last comment
I'd like to make real quick about the fire situation with the
condominiums and the fire control alarm system company.
Since this is going to be carried on until October, is there a way
that we can find out if these alarms have been actually taken care and
fixed in Park Plaza and these other units that are underway are safe?
MR. OSSORIO: I think they do have permits now.
The question is, it's not about the work or the quality of work or
unsafety of it. The question is is it's a continuance process. I don't
want to get into the meat of the case, but hopefully we'll have some
mitigation issues next month.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay, but there's no safety
factor involved right not.
MR. OSSORIO: No, there's not.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Okay, that's what I was
wondering.
Motion on the floor to adjourn. Second?
Page 34
September 19,2007
MR. HERRIMAN: Second, Herriman.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Motion and a second. All in
favor?
MR. HERRIMAN: Aye.
MR. BLUM: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: Aye.
MS. KELLER: Aye.
MR. BOYD: Aye.
ACTING CHAIRMAN JOSLIN: See you next month.
******
There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:09 a.m.
COLLIER COUNTY CODE
ENFORCEMENT BOARD
RICHARD JOSLIN, ACTING CHAIRPERSON
Transcript prepared on behalf of Gregory Court Reporting Service,
Inc., by Cherie' R. Nottingham.
Page 35