Loading...
AHAC Agenda 04/18/2023Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) AGENDA Growth Management Community Development Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Steve Hruby, Chair Mary Waller, Member John Harney, Member Jennifer Faron, Vice Chair Gary Hains, Member April 18, 2023, 8:30 A.M. AHAC Members Commissioner Chris Hall, Member Jessica Brinkert, Member Arol Buntzman, Member Todd Lyon, Member Paul Shea, Member COLLIER COUNTY STAFF Jamie French, Department Head, GMD Michael Bosi, Director, Planning & Zoning Jaime Cook, Director, Development Review Cormac Giblin, Interim Director, Economic Development and Housing Sarah Harrington, Manager, Environmental Services Julie Chardon, Operations Support Specialist II, Operations & Regulatory Management NOTE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. ALL REGISTERED SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. DURING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION, COMMITTEE MEMBERS MAY ASK DIRECT QUESTIONS TO INDIVIDUALS. PLEASE WAIT TO BE RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND STATE YOUR NAME AND AFFILIATION FOR THE RECORD BEFORE COMMENTING. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE. 1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND STAFF 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES a. Approval of today's agenda b. Approval of March 21, 2023, AHAC meeting minutes 4. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND PRESENTATION a. Committee Vacancies- 2 applications 5. PUBLIC COMMENT a. Persons wishing to speak must register prior to speaking. All registered speakers will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the time is adjusted by the Chairman. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS a. Subcommittee Recap - J. Harney i. AHAC- Work Plan Overview b. BCC Initiatives vs Live Local Act — M. Bosi C. Golden Gate Golf Course Development Update — C. Giblin d. Haven GMPA and PUD — proposed BCC Date 5/23/23 — C. Giblin 7. STAFF AND COMMITTEE GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 8. NEW BUSINESS 9. ADJOURN 10. NEXT AHAC MEETING DATE AND LOCATION: May 16th, 2023, 8:30A.M. at Conference Room 609/610 - Growth Management Community Development Department March 21, 2023 MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, March 21, 2023 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management Department Building, Conference Room #609/610, 2800 Horseshoe Drive North, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Chairman: Steve Hruby Vice Chairman: Jennifer Faron Jessica Brinkert (excused) Arol Buntzman (via Zoom) Gary Hains Commissioner Chris Hall John Harney Todd Lyon Paul Shea Mary Waller County Staff Members Present: Cormac Giblin, Interim Director, Economic Development & Housing Mike Bosi, Director, Planning & Zoning Derek Perry, Assistant County Attorney, County Attorney's Office Kelly Green, Accountant, Economic Development & Housing March 21, 2023 Any persons in need of a verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording from the Collier County Growth Management Department. 1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acting Chairman Hruby called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. 2. ROLL CALL OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND STAFF Mr. Giblin said Mr. Buntzman was joining via Zoom and asked for a vote to allow participation, noting that he can vote, but it can't count toward a quorum. Ms. Waller made a motion to allow Mr. Buntzman to participate in the meeting via Zoom. The motion was seconded The motion passed unanimously, 8-0, Mr. Buntzman abstainer) Ms. Green conducted the roll call. A quorum of eight was present in the boardroom (not including Mr. Buntzman). Acting Chairman Hruby told the committee: • He wanted to discuss what has occurred in the AHAC over the past roughly 30 days. • He and Ms. Waller have been on this committee for a long time. • We need to think about where we've come from and where we want to go as a committee. • We used to meet in this room years ago and no one would listen to us. We couldn't get any press or the Board of County Commissioners to listen. It was impossible to get somebody to join us when we needed to replace a member. • We just had 11 applicants for the last round, so we've received attention and the quality of applicants is high quality people. This is a wonderful board. • He's optimistic about where we're going compared to where we were 10-12 years ago and where we are now. • The turning point was when the ULI report got published. Not only did the housing crisis get greater, but the report offered a road map for how we could begin to solve the problems. • He's optimistic about what happened in the past five or seven years and where we're going in the future. • This is a slow process. He spoke to a lot of groups around the city — community groups, philanthropic groups, business groups — and they understand the problem. • Our affordable housing crisis made national news last month in Bloomberg business news and about 20% of that article had to do with what happened to us last month. This is good and bad. The exposure helped and we know the community and nation know the problem. The bad news is that the nation knows and that affects our ability to attract businesses and tourism to Collier County. If workers aren't able to live here, we're not going to get services and we're going to end up losing our market share and become a has-been community. • We need to solve the problem. Our obligation is to advise Commissioner Hall and commissioners on best practices and what we can do. • We need to keep it on the level of policy, how the county and government interfaces and performs public -private partnerships with the public sector to make things happen. That includes policy, regulation, subsidizing and filling a gap, whether it's money, land or other resources. • Government needs to be the gap filler to provide things that the private sector needs to make things happen. That's our role. 0► March 21, 2023 What's happened over the past few months since we moved to the Growth Management Department has been very positive and we're going in the right direction. We need to let the public know that things are happening and we are doing something. It's a slow process and it will take time. Development doesn't happen overnight. What we do in the next two months may take three years to come to fruition and people need to understand that. 3. APROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES a. Approval of today's agenda Ms. Waller said she wanted to add a discussion about the Housing Trust Fund to the agenda. Mr. Giblin said that could be added as 6.b. Ms. Waller made a motion to approve the agenda, as amended. The motion was seconded The motion passed unanimously, 9-0. b. Approval of February 15, 2023, AHAC meeting minutes Ms. Waller made a motion to approve the February 15, 2023, meeting minutes. The motion was seconded The motion passed unanimously, 9-0. Chairman Hruby told the AHAC. • We need to discuss the new chair and the member vacancy advertisement. • This week, he and Cormac spent an hour or more on how to put this agenda together and what the issues were. • We need a replacement for Joe Trachtenberg's chairman position. • I was vice chair and am now sitting in the chair position as my obligation. • He and Cormac discussed this and there's no regulation or code about how we elect officers here. By tradition, we do it every January I" and Joe was re-elected then. • There are three options: You can let the vice chair assume the chairmanship, so I would become your chair and we would nominate a new vice chair to replace me. The second option is we can wait until we fill the two positions available and then conduct new elections. The third is we can have new elections today and elect a chair and vice chair, even though we're just two months into this cycle. • It's up to the committee's discretion. • He opened it up for discussion. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • It would be unfair to put new applicants in that role, so we should take a vote now. • Acting Chairman Hruby said he's served in his role for years, is passionate about it and would take the chairman role if they supported that. • They can vote him in as chair and vote in a vice chair. Commissioner Hall made a motion to elect Acting Chairman Hruby as chairman. Second by Mr. Shea. The motion passed unanimously, 9-0. Chairman Hruby asked for nominations for vice chair. Commissioner Hall made a motion to elect Ms Faron as vice chair. The motion was seconded The motion passed unanimously, 9-0. March 21, 2023 4. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND PRESENTATION a. CoFuture LLC Presentation by Stephen LaMelza Commissioner Hall said he met with them in his office two weeks ago and they brought some good ideas, so he asked them to present them to the AHAC this morning because he considers what they said viable solutions in the short-term. [Mr. LaMelza detailed a PowerPoint presentation and PDF document.] Mr. LaMelza told the AHAC. • He's a mechanical engineer from Purdue University. • His father has always been a developer. They want to solve the affordable housing crisis. • They developed a panelization product, construct all their steel studs and cut out middlemen to drive the cost down using superior quality material, such as insulated wall panels, steel studs, a TPO-style roof to create a low -maintenance, affordable home. • Our goal is to utilize manufacturing industry standards, tolerances and premium materials to facilitate builders to solve Florida's affordable housing crisis. • He's a panelization manufacturer, so he can do this for many builders, but now we're using his father as a developer to build roughly 1,500 units in Arcadia. • We have the reach to go about 250 miles from our facility to subsidize Collier County. • Our vision is to deliver a premium product to builders that will decrease the labor time in assembling a home by using built -to -specification steel wall panels so homes can be erected in one day. • It's essentially the Henry Ford assembly -line model. Instead of the product moving, the crews will move. He has one crew that does framing, one for roofing, another siding. • After 36 days, you're turning out a unit turnkey in one single day. • Our mission is to solve the epidemic of increased housing prices by providing a quality and affordable time -saving product • The inflation rates increasing, the median value of a single family home is skyrocketing, but wages are pretty stagnant, so developers can't keep up and provide affordable housing to those who need it, the firemen, the teachers, the low-income workers. • They'll never build equity in their product. We want to provide an opportunity to do that. • In his competitor analysis, steel has greater tensile strength and needs fewer studs than wood. We're not building out of block. Steel doesn't warp, shrink or rot, it's hurricane termite, mold and fire resistant and it's all recyclable, so it's a green product. • Wood is not resistant to the elements, so you have about 20% scrap when you're building with wood versus our product. • We are using 2-3% scrap, so when we built this unit in Punta Gorda, he didn't have a Dumpster onsite. He used his 8-foot bed in the back of his truck for a Dumpster and that was mainly drywall, nothing else. • The development is set up next to the Walmart distribution plant and that's where his facility was before Hurricane Ian, but we're building a new one. • This land is zoned for residential, commercial and industrial, and it's a $37.5 million approved CD. • We're building 419 units in Phase 1 and the back half is the remaining units, with a community center, condos and duplexes. Initially, we're targeting single-family homes. • CoFuture is a premium manufacturer utilizing the latest technology to manufacture prefabricated steel wall panels. We do all our cold roll forming and manufacture everything in house using all American -made steel. 4 March 21, 2023 The problem with the current inflation, the shortage of craftsmen and household income is that it's nearly impossible for the working class to afford a quality home or raise a family in a safe place. Our vision and solution is to minimize the cost and production of the final home construction to make affordable homes a reality, stronger, better and faster. We have a Vimeo with three videos that shows our proof of concept. Mr. LaMelza described the building process and noted that the unit he was showing was built in a day and survived Hurricane Ian. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • Once finished, the dimensions are 69 feet, 6 inches by 27 feet, with four units per acre. • They'd like to do modular in the future. • They eventually want to turn on water and electricity the same day. • This unit in Punta Gorda has a $302,000 sale price to the end user. • Everything is tiled, impact -rated glass, open -floor concept and there are foam ceilings. • We have 411 acres in Arcadia, Desoto County, but want to expand to Collier County. • It's impossible to find land at a number that makes any sense. • This is the highest -rated galvanized, so you could build these houses on the beach. There are 27,000 screws so they never come apart. • Even if it's hot outside, the air conditioning doesn't go on even in the late afternoon. It's the same with the garage, where temperatures are maintained in the 70s, so that helps the people buying a home with the cost of utility bills and maintenance. If it's cold outside, it stays 70 degrees inside. • There's no maintenance other than painting the front door and garage door. • There is no penetration in the roof. • The exterior siding is guaranteed "no -fade" for 30 years, so you don't have to paint it. The roof reflects the heat rays of the sun, so you get a cooler roof. The roof has a pitch, but you don't see that because the gutter runs along the side and is extended away from the house, so you never get any water going into the house. • From a land -use perspective, Mr. Bosi said four units per acre is pretty common. That's what our future land -use map would allocate. The task is finding a parcel to build on. • The rezoning would not be difficult to obtain here. • Habitat for Humanity can't build four per acre anymore because land is too expensive, so we're building six units per acre. • Wiring and rough plumbing for CoFuture takes one day. The subs get the work done. We expect to be able to build two per day. • They can provide new renderings and just hired a new engineering firm and added a foot to the homes. • We're building a new state-of-the-art warehouse that should be done within the next seven months. We're doing all the land permitting now. • We're in now at the highest cost for steel but it's starting to come down slightly. If it comes down and we're able to reduce that price, we'd reduce it for the end buyer. • We want to encourage developers like you who want to come here and build affordable housing. We'll do whatever we can do to help you find land and go in the right direction. b. Update on Proposed State Legislation, Michael Puchalla, executive director of the Collier Community Land Trust and HELP Mr. Puchalla detailed the status of House Bill 627, the Live Local Act. 0 It passed the Senate. He heard the House attorney's analysis and doesn't know if it will March 21, 2023 pass. There may be revisions. • There was an update last night and it now heads to the Ways & Means Committee on March 23, then the House floor. • A lot has to do with funding for the Florida Housing Finance Corp., additional money for sale. You can offset some of your corporate income tax, potential sales tax, by investing in affordable housing, and you do that at the state level. • They're looking to generate more than $100,000 million for affordable housing. • It's competitive. Money will be available to support affordable housing. That will dramatically increase because of this bill and have more benefits. • It will provide multi -family and quality mixed -use developments of at least 40% affordable units for up to 40 years. • Land -use changes and comprehensive land -use amendments will enable the county and developers to do more than they can now. • It removes the authority of local governments to adopt or maintain laws, ordinances, rules or other measures that would have the effect of imposing controls on rents. • It specifies requirements and restrictions on counties in approving housing developments. • It authorizes local governments to adopt ordinances to provide an ad valorem tax exemption for portions of property used to provide affordable housing. • It revises the total amount of community contribution tax credits that may be granted for projects. • It provides a sales tax exemption for building materials used in the construction of affordable housing units. • It authorizes the department to make information available to corporations to administer the Live Local Program. • It prohibits the deduction of a General Revenue Fund service charge on documentary stamp tax proceeds. • It provides appropriations. • For the Land Trust, land can be leased for 99 years for low-income housing. It adds value to the Land Trust model. • It's giving corporate entities an opportunity to invest in the sale program, the state Apartment Incentive Loan Program, which is somewhat unprecedented. They're giving additional tax credits. • You can offset some of your corporate income tax/potential sales tax by investing in affordable housing. You do that at the state level. • They're looking to generate up to another $100 million for the sale program. • The GAP funding sale program can be a very beneficial program. It's somewhat competitive, but the amount of increase in that is substantial. That doesn't necessarily impact the local community, but the dollars available to help support affordable housing are going to dramatically increase because of this bill. • It's set for a roughly 10-year period. They're going to fund an extra $150 million per year for 10 years into the sale program out of general revenue. • Rather than raiding the Sadowski (Housing Trust) Fund, which we've heard about for years, they're putting more money in, so it's a significant investment. • This will make the landscape for affordable developers more advantageous. They're going to have some benefits they haven't had as far as impact to local government. • The big impacts are on multifamily -rental developments, land -use and density. There are some commitments. They're preempting some of what local governments can do, so we need to be aware that if this doesn't change, this will probably become law. • The bill preempts counties on zoning, density and height. A county must authorize multifamily and qualifying mixed -use residential developments as allowable uses in any area zoned for commercial or mixed -use if at least 40% of the units will be affordable for r%l March 21, 2023 at least 30 years and serves income up to 120% of AMI. • There's some backlash on that because if we're only doing 40%, it could probably go a little further. • It states that the county may not require a zoning land -use change, a special exception, conditional -use approval, variance or a comprehensive -plan amendment for such development. If this remains, it somewhat handcuffs what the community can do and will open the door for affordable -housing developers to look at areas they can't do that now. • The bill provides that land owned entirely by a non-profit that's leased for at least 99 years for the purpose of, and used to provide, affordable housing for extremely low, very low, low- or moderate -income persons or families is exempt from ad valorem taxation. • That adds value to the Land Trust model as we try to support developers who want to build affordable housing. • There's a missing middle -tax exemption that was key to this. Developers who are going to commit at least 70 units for affordability for households making up to 80%, or up to 120% of AMI, can get a 75% property tax exemption on up to 120 units. • This will be administered through Florida Housing Finance Corporation. • If a builder wants to take advantage of this, they must fill out a Florida Housing application and basically swear they're going to keep these units affordable. • There are stiff penalties if they're found to have not complied with the terms. • To receive the tax exemption, a property owner must submit an application to the county Property Appraiser by March 1st, accompanied by a certification notice from Florida Housing Finance Corp., so they're going to build a process into this to help local governments work through it. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • Commissioner Hall asked if there was a time limit on the ad valorem relief, or is it in perpetuity? • Mr. Puchalla said it's not specified here, but it must remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years. His assumption is that after the 30-year expiration, it's going to become market rate, then at that point you're going to lose the exemption. This still needs to be defined. • Mr. Harney said he'd like him to speak to Mr. Bosi about how that affects development. • Mr. Giblin and Mr. Puchalla agreed the county is ahead of the curve. • Mr. Harney asked if there was anything in the county that doesn't work with this. Mr. Bosi told the AHAC. • Mr. Puchalla described mostly the finance side, which doesn't involve the Growth Management Plan going to the BCC on March 28. • We're considering a proposal involving commercially zoned property that sits along the East Trail or the non -Activity Centers. The properties would be eligible to be converted to residential development for affordable housing without a need for a public hearing. • Michael noted that if a developer acquired property and was proposing 40% at 120% AMI, there wouldn't be a rezoning process. • There are pros and cons, but the Board of County Commissioners would be preempted by the state, which would require the county to allow that to move forward by right. Commissioner Hall said that means that if this passes the House and becomes law, anybody can come in and build. They could go to Third Street and they have the right to build the highest building within a mile and the highest density in the county and all they'd have to do is provide 40% affordability, so they could build 400 affordable units and 600 market rate units and you'd have a tower downtown by right. He spoke with Senate President Passidomo and mentioned that to her. It didn't matter. It passed hours later. About 99% of the bill is amazing. It gets government 7 March 21, 2023 out of the way and allows positive things to happen, but the preemptions have the potential to be very bad for our community. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • There are always unintended consequences for anything you do and that's a scary one. • There wasn't a lot of opposition from the Senate or House, which passed it unanimously. • The Senate's first committee passed it 18-3, so three people had concerns. • We'll monitor how it progresses. • We publicize a list of lands available for affordable housing and this adds more, but with a specification on what needs to be done. • The bill requires counties and municipalities to produce their real -property inventory lists by October 1, 2023, and every three years thereafter. • That list must be made available on a county or municipal website and counties and municipalities must include real property owned by dependent special districts within their boundaries. • There are some best practices that they put forward that counties and municipalities are encouraged to adopt in creating surplus land programs. They include establishing eligibility criteria for the receipt or purchase of surplus land by developers, which sounds like our surtax program, so we're ahead of the curve. • They're going to encourage making the process for requesting surplus lands publicly available and ensuring long-term affordability through ground leases, which sounds like Land Trust, by retaining the right of first refusal to purchase property that would otherwise be sold or offered at market rate. • It also says the Florida Housing Finance Corporation is working with the Florida Housing Coalition, so the coalition, through its catalyst program, is offering to help local governments. • If this passes and new restrictions are placed on local governments, they're encouraging us to connect with the catalyst program through the Florida Housing Coalition to get technical advice on making sure everything is correctly done. • The financing for developers enables them to understand what they can apply for and what kind of increases in incentives they could gain from the program. • It's optimistic that Collier County is ahead of the game. • Commissioner Hall said the BCC is full force ahead for March 28. • Mr. Puchalla is open to exploring housing opportunities. The future may be in new technologies that speed up that timeline. But the land is the big piece. • We need to check to see if there are lands the state owns in Collier. It could be donated and they could work through the Land Trust to find models that work. • A lot involves multifamily, but we still need to focus on single-family homeownership. C. Collier Housing Trends, Shimberg Report (J. Harney Request) Mr. Giblin said Committee Member Harney asked that we include this as an informational backup to today's meeting. It was prepared in December 2022 by the Shimberg Center at the University of Florida and has more of the same eye -popping statistics about the current state of housing affordability in Collier County. Mr. Harney said this is important information and it's more dire now after the hurricane. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • This changes the number we have frequently talked about, a deficit of 10,000 units. This states there were 11,000 at that time (pre -hurricane). • This is a very widely respected organization that prepares these. 12 March 21, 2023 The statistics are sound and very well documented. This report is used all the time, even in private industry. It's universally accepted. The Shimberg Center at USF is mandated by the state legislature to be the affordable - housing data source for use in local government planning. d. 2022 Annual AHAC Report Review (J. Harney Request) Mr. Harney said it's important for us to take another look back at what we'd planned for this year because we made these plans last summer and we now have new members. This is primarily for information. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • The timeline is to work on this over the summer. • It goes to the BCC for approval in the fall. • It's submitted to the state in November or December. • This isn't the final product, but an annual work plan and tactical part of a strategic plan. • Some are required items by the state and some will be resolved at the BCC's March 28 meeting. • We'll have three meetings over the summer. • This gets us working on goals and implementation. • We need to take a fresh look at initiatives. A good example is guest-house rentals. The report says there was no appetite for that, but things changed and we're now looking into it. • We're looking to staff to highlight issues we should be addressing, changes in trends. • The Planning Commission voted unanimously last week to forward the Rural -Fringe Mixed -Use District Transfer -Development Rights rules, which is a very big change. • Mr. Harney asked that this be put on the calendar for the Board of County Commissioners to look at because they're the next step. This would allow developers to build hundreds, possibly thousands, of affordable units in the Rural -Fringe area, an area that hasn't been developed. It could be developed as villages to be self-contained communities, rather than driving back and forth to a developed area. • It's important because those villages are going to develop into self-sustaining small entities. Now is the time to ensure we have some affordability in those villages before we end up with the same problem in the east. • The plan that Mike and Growth Management staff developed encourages commercial development there to a much greater extent than other things that have happened recently. Mr. Bosi told the AHAC. • That item is scheduled for the BCC's April 20 agenda. • Not only does it increase the density, which is .2 units an acre, you can get up to 12.2 units an acre if you're dedicated it to affordable housing. • It does not require the consumption of Transferred Development Rights. The TDR is not required. • Obtaining TDRs because of assembly can be costly and can put the brakes on an affordable housing project. We removed that restriction. We recognize the public benefit. • The village concept is still our aspiration, but we've put language in that says an affordable -housing project could have standard loan commercial and not have to meet all the design requirements, the green -space requirements, the additional aspects of cost for developing a full-blown village, so sustainability can be attained, but at a much M March 21, 2023 lower price in terms of being able to support a public and commercial center in close proximity or within the community that is being proposed for affordable housing. That's an allowance that has been suggested as part of those amendments. Chairman Hruby said they can start that in June. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT Peter Goodin, of Spanish Oaks Lane in Naples, told the AHAC: • He noticed they didn't have a for -profit investor on the AHAC so he wanted to bring some issues to their attention. • Over the last year, taxes went up 24% on his investment properties while taxes on his home dropped 1%. We're passing that increase on to our renters just to tread water. • Insurance rates are skyrocketing and with just those three things, that would push the one vacant house he has up by $300 a month in rent. • Landlords get a lot of flak over affordable housing, but all this is pushing landlords into the seasonal and vacation rental market. • Golden Gate Estates has often been held up as a problem when it was conceived. There was nothing there and now there's a sudden transition between high -density and low -density, and the result is that in certain cases, affordable -housing folks would like to turn high -density or low -density Golden Gate Estates zoning into high -density as a means of solving the affordable housing problem. This effectively makes the estates into a land bank for high -density units. • His suggestion to the AHAC and BCC is to consider revising the ADU rules for the Estates because letting homeowners make a decision on whether to put a rental unit behind their house at the same rules for square -footage proportions is a little more consistent with the neighborhood. He believes most Estates secondary roads aren't near capacity. • Prefab houses might work, as we heard from CoFuture. Commissioner McDaniel has indicated he might support that for the Urban Estates currently, and for the Eastern Estates after infrastructure catches up with its abilities to support that. • He doesn't know if the state or commissioners would agree to this. It's in the commissioners' hands. Mr. Harney asked Mr. Bosi about the rules for ADUs. Mr. Bosi said they need to get an answer on whether it affects a homestead exemption and speak to residents in Logan Woods and Oakes Estates about their opinion of that, then present it to the AHAC and then ask the BCC. We need the opinions of the largest residential areas. We're thinking about not just targeting the two largest areas. Mr. Giblin said he and Jamie had a conversation with an apartment developer who opened his books to them. On one unit he was renting for $2,500, and his ongoing monthly costs for management were $1,400 monthly, including insurance, taxes, staff, repairs and maintenance, more than half the rent cost. It's the soft costs, not the actual unit, principal or interest of the actual development. It was eye opening to all of us to see what those numbers were as we continue to ask developers to hit those price points. Chairman Hruby said that's interesting because the belief is that landlords are gouging. Those three elements have caused an impact not only on apartments, but some businesses. Seeing what's going on is helpful. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS a. Subcommittee Recaps March 21, 2023 [Mr. Giblin passed out an outline of the discussions at both subcommittee meetings.] i. AHAC Strategic Plan Subcommittee Meeting (fka Bylaws Subcommittee) Mr. Giblin provided a summary of what occurred. • This began as the Bylaws Subcommittee and morphed into the Strategic Planning Subcommittee to set high-level goals of what the AHAC would focus its work on for the upcoming year or five years. • Through discussion and by looking at previous local housing assistance plans like those we heard earlier on the agenda, the subcommittee said these are what we consider important for the subcommittee to focus on in the future. • They created a matrix to specify roles in each of these, such as AHAC, Growth Management, the Development Service Advisory Committee, or the Board of County Commissioners. • This is a working list of 14 items the subcommittee came up with to focus their production of a strategic plan, which dovetails into the Local Housing Assistance Plan we're required to do over the summer. • He asked Mr. Harney, the subcommittee's chair, if he had anything more. Mr. Harney told the AHAC: • Maybe this page could be updated monthly for us. • Often, after we've worked on something and it makes its way through county processes, we don't know who has it next or when they'll be talking about it. That would be helpful for the AHAC. • It's critical because we now have Jennifer working with the DSAC and Paul is on the Planning Commission. We have those linkages, but we're not getting all this information back to where we can all see it, do something about it and provide support for what we're trying to do in those meetings. • It would be helpful to know the status and when they're discussing it next. • He wants to consolidate all that so everyone can see them together and use it as an ongoing document going forward. Vice Chair Faron told the AHAC. • She didn't envision this as the final product. It's an annual work plan they can add to. • Because we're not defining our goals, strategies and tactics, this is the tactical part of a strategic plan and gets us working on issues. • She's from the private sector, which says, "Plan your work and work your plan." • A plan needs definitive things, such as: Where are we now? What is the next step? Who's responsible? Who are the sponsors? Who's the staff liaison? What's the timing for the next step? Where are we with respect to the recommendation piece that goes to the BCC? • This doesn't say where we are at any point in time. This report can morph into more so someone could pick it up and see what we're working on and where we are. • This could be a report card we could give the BCC to show what we've been doing and that they can expect AHAC recommendations. • We're fortunate to have a BCC liaison here. We need to utilize this position better. We need to come up with three things Commissioner Hall could be thinking about with respect to the AHAC when he's with colleagues and constituents and draw on feedback from him and others to inform what happens here. • This document needs time frames, who is responsible for each item, etc. That would allow us to track it and update it monthly. 11 March 21, 2023 Chairman Hruby said this is a good summary of the AHAC's tasks. Mr. Harney said we should spend time on this at another meeting. 1. Affordable Housing Commitment Tracking Report Mr. Giblin reported that. • The Affordable Housing Commitment Tracking Report spreadsheet came out of the subcommittee to track projects once approved or while they're in the approval stage. • This is first draft is a little confusing and hard to read. • Jamie French tasked our Growth Management IT department to go into its CityView portal and spit out all projects that include affordable -housing commitments or those that are proposed and this is the result. • There are about 70 projects in our Commitment Tracking System or CityView now pending approvals and hearings. • Mr. French wanted to provide this to you to show you we have the data. It's up to us to make it more manageable, readable and understandable. This is a work -in -progress. • CityView is where our planning and permitting projects are. It's our building software. • CTS is a Commitment -Tracking System. Once a development is approved, all the development's commitments are put into a separate system for annual monitoring and tracking through the Commitment Tracking System. Chairman Hruby said when he looks at it, his eyes glaze over. The AHAC needs to know the number of units, how many units are affordable and how many units are non -affordable. What's the duration? Is it a 15-year, 20-year or 30-year commitment? Where are we in that commitment phase? We need to have some idea about the implications of each of those developments. The narrative and history is interesting, but he wants statistics. Mr. Giblin said that a few weeks ago, he sent Commissioner Hall a list taken from these sources that showed the number of units and the time frame. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • It's important for the AHAC members to attend Neighborhood Information Meetings. We can divvy them up. • Mr. Shea said the Planning Commission gets a list of NIMs with dates. Mr. Bosi could mail that to everyone. • Mr. Bosi said the list includes NIM and HEX (hearing examiner) dates. • The idea is for members to go to meetings to listen to concerns. • They should have an elevator pitch on what the AHAC does and what the county's housing problems are so they can advocate for affordable housing. • We should have a consistent, uniform message, whether we're having dinner with a politician or going to homeowner association meetings. • It doesn't have to be so much about the need, but about what we're doing and what they can be doing to help the situation. • When projects are under review, it could take a year before they go to the Planning Commission. It depends on how many resubmissions a developer needs to make to answer all staff comments. ii. AHAC Surtax Subcommittee Meeting Mr. Giblin provided a summary of the subcommittee's report. • Based on the feedback at the previous subcommittee meeting and the previous full 12 March 21, 2023 AHAC meeting, there's a strong desire and direction from the subcommittee to look at this in totality, not only the components of the land acquisition, but also in terms of development activity. • We need to sponsor and develop a tool for evaluating both of those at the same time surtax dollars are looked at for spending. • This was presented to the subcommittee two weeks ago and with just a few minor tweaks, they voted to move this on to the full committee. • Our timeline since that meeting has been accelerated. After that meeting, the County Manager's Office directed us to bring this to the Board of County Commissioners for adoption at the next meeting, March 28. We'd planned on bringing this to the Surtax Committee first, then the BCC, but that changed. • It's on the consent agenda for next Tuesday's BCC meeting. It won't be pulled off the consent agenda unless someone wants to talk about it further. Once it's approved by the BCC, it'll move on and become practice. • Because it's in the BCC's agenda system, there have been comments from division directors, the County Manager's Office and County Attorney's Office. • The first change was to the scoring matrix, page 1. The County Manager's Office didn't feel it was necessary to award points to just for submitting a cover letter, so their recommendation is to make that a zero -point required submission and to add to the two extra points to the Property & Business Plan, so those would be 0 and 45. • The next change is on page 2 under item number 5, the fifth bullet -point down. There was some discussion by the Surtax Subcommittee about this item, as well as the County Manager's suggestion. The bullet now reads, "A requirement that 100% of the units built to be affordable (subject to change based on individual project priorities) ... • Then there's a reference to the state statute that says, "But in no circumstance may there be less than 30% affordable units, in accordance with state statute." • There was additional discussion by the subcommittee and some committee members thought that it should not be 100% affordable. Some thought it should be a sliding scale based on what percentage of the overall development is affordable, so that's the percentage of surtax dollars that will contribute. If you have a $100 million property that you're proposing to be 60% affordable, the surtax would contribute 60% of the purchase price. • The committee needs to discuss this recommendation. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • Ms. Waller was against it being 100% affordable. • Commissioner Hall said if we want 100% affordable, a sliding scale is a good way to accomplish that. • Mr. Giblin said there could be legal challenges because if you're buying one parcel of property, the statute requires that the county maintain title to that property if it's being purchased with surtax money. • A developer who's paying 40% may not agree to that, or their bank might not. • How do you divide out 40% of the property and subdivide it? That puts affordable housing on one side of the street and non -affordable housing and the other side, so there's an unintended consequence. That legal land -use issue needs to be addressed. • That could create a non -starter for developers. They may not want to put all their land into a land trust. It could end up with non -responsiveness. • If these dollars are so valuable for affordable housing, maybe we should covet them and not allow any market -rate housing to be developed using surtax dollars. The flip side is maybe you want mixed -income or other communities. • What are the key features we want? What's the leverage we're getting out of it? 13 March 21, 2023 • We're setting ourselves up for something that might not attract developers, or we could end up spending a lot of money and getting few housing units. • There's a concern about this percentage, the implications of it. The decision would be up to a selection committee. If a developer came in with more affordable housing, the project would get a more heavily weighted score, more favorable to getting funding. • Can we say we encourage 100%, but no less than 30%? • There's still a legal land -use issue about how you put this project into a land trust when there's only a portion of the land being used for affordable housing. • How do we account for different levels of affordable housing? • There's a weighted scoring criteria. The level of affordability is one of those criteria. • A developer would push that up to the limits of 60% because there's better cash now. • The County Attorney's Office put a legal disclaimer at the end: "The Board of County Commissioners may use all, part or none of these recommendations for future acquisitions." Ms. Waller made a motion to accept the Surtax Subcommittee report and forward it as a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Second by Mr. Harney. The motion passed unanimously, 8-0. b. Discussion on the Housing Trust Fund Ms. Waller said she added this to the agenda because when she was at the grant ranking and review, she wanted to know why the Housing Trust Fund money wasn't part of the money we were distributing. They said that when the AHAC was moved to this building, it's under a new umbrella and that money was transferred here. According to the policies and procedures that were put together under the Housing Trust Fund, it was supposed to have been operated the other way. Do we need to relook at the Housing Trust Fund to get that money in place so we can start giving it out to developers who come in? There were people who would have benefited from that money if it had been in the pool that we were distributing at the review. Mr. Giblin said he didn't know why CHS didn't include awards from the Housing Trust Fund in its annual grant -application cycle, as they historically have done. When housing policy functions were brought to Growth Management, the split was that funding, awards, application review and monitoring stayed at CHS. The policy piece came here. We're talking about a strategic -plan surtax policy. For example, this surtax policy that we're developing now, when it's time to review proposals, that's a CHS function. He's not sure where the dollars are, but he's been working with the new finance director and those functions and dollars should stay at CHS, or they should be given back. If it's not in CityView and we don't accept an electronic payment, it's not a Growth Management function and we're staying at the LDC, GMP and policy level. This is an ongoing discussion between CHS and Growth Management to get that formalized and back on track. Ms. Waller said when there's another call for grants for that money, that's something staff can work on to get that pool of money put back in that pot, so when there's a qualified candidate, we can award that money and get some rental properties going. Mr. Giblin said he agreed 100%. We'll work with CHS. That was mentioned at one of the last subcommittee meetings to have them start that. Even though the AHAC now falls under GMD, there are crossover items that would be good to have CHS representation on, as well. 7. STAFF AND COMMITTEE GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS (None) 14 March 21, 2023 8. NEW BUSINESS Commissioner Hall said while meeting with Michael Puchalla, he brought up a state statute that was HB 1339, which says that by statute, the Board of County Commissioners can approve an affordable -housing project on lands that aren't zoned currently for that use without having to go through the rezoning process. It's never been used by Collier County, so he'd like to see the committee quickly review it and make a recommendation to the BCC that we implement that statute. We have people here who could greatly benefit from that and it would expedite the process and make it run smoothly. It's a state statute, so there's nothing to get approved, but an AHAC recommendation would carry weight. Chairman Hruby said we're all aware of that statute. We've had discussions and individually, he and Michael talked about it and the Land Trust focused on that. That's a very good suggestion. If we make a recommendation to him, he can take it back to other commissioners to see if we can implement something. He's talked to developers who would love to implement that. They're looking at properties and noted that we've never done that before. We should be the first. Mr. Shea said he also brought it up. Mr. Giblin noted that it was passed by the state a year or two ago and was seen as a silver bullet to combat NIMBYism. It basically says that if a developer meets certain affordability criteria, they can build affordable housing on a piece of land, no matter what the Growth - Management Plan, Land -Development Code or PUD says it should be. It bypasses the public approval process. It probably should be used with caution and not every time. It's something we're aware of and we're looking at properties that might benefit from it. Chairman Hruby noted that there are a lot of properties on the East Trail or Pine Ridge — bulldozer bait — that don't have NIMBY implications and would benefit. We could put that on the agenda for next month. He asked that FIB 1339 be put on the agenda for discussion. A discussion ensued about the next subcommittee meeting and Mr. Giblin said he'd look at the calendar and room availability and send options for meeting dates. Ms. Waller noted that they had two presentations a month ago. Nothing was done or said. Do we make a recommendation to the BCC that we think this is a great project? We need to do more than listen to people talk. Chairman Hruby said he believed that on the McDowell presentation, we made that recommendation. We said this is interesting and it looked like something that staff and the BCC should be taking a look at and considering. Mr. Giblin said there are two types of presentations. The ones you're referring to, such as today's and last month's presentations, were just public presentations. They wanted to share their good news with you about what they're doing. Their purpose might be to garner interest and support. A committee member might visit their project and generate community buzz. If a development was seeking your actual recommendation and support, we would put them on as a discussion item. As Steve said, affordable housing developments in the past, like McDowell or an apartment complex, are looking for approvals at the Planning Commission and then the Board of County Commissioners. Sometimes, they elect to come to the AHAC first to make a presentation and get a recommendation. That would then be part of the record as it moves 15 March 21, 2023 through the public process. You haven't seen one of those in a while, but when it's appropriate, the ARAC makes a recommendation that's passed on as part of the public record. 9. ADJOURN Ms. Waller made a motion to adjourn. Second by Commissioner Hall. The motion passed unanimously, 8-0. 10. NEXT MEETING DATE 8:30 a.m. April 18, 2023 Conference Room 609/610 Growth Management Community Development Department There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the chairman at 10:24 a.m. These minutes were a (check on as presentea A , or as amenaea IV AHAC Meeting April 18', 2023 8:30 a.m. Sign -In Sheet - Page 2 Signature Name E-Mail Address (If e-mail has changed, please cross out and make changes) Organization Represented �? G� ���✓G ew 6QrcoB �� Al4i l %✓cc o7 G, X'LlwfC�CF2 C f ti CY�ac-�[n(� eaUS� C�1�� EJ1 /C� ke6�c_ fiN M45, . AAA � a, _TSA�4 C, O 1r A Ucq' C 11 cl 6 JrJ /VHa w" � r I vC t Q, �Gi 4 011n�� G — o�4 0?,V, i �� ► 1� oC7 ��i Jf'iLA e DMVY\ •CINN 672 614 113 Agenda Item No. Agenda Item Topic (For Public Comment, list topic) Meeting Date: Name: 1�-� �C Address: Representing/Petitioner: C cc L.:--t Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT iS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF -PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS, PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF -PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM, PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS —.PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 3/15/2023 10:01:29 AM. Name: Hannah R Roberts Home Phone: 239-287-3385 Home Address: 1611 Hickory Road City: Naples Zip Code: 34108 Phone Numbers Business: 239-287-3385 E-Mail Address: rhannahroberts6ll@gmail.com Board or Committee: Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Category: Employer in the Area Place of Employment: Soave Real Estate Group How long have you lived in Collier County: more than 15 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (anv level felonv or first degree misdemeanor only)? Nol Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list vour communitv activities and positions held: )Associate Leadership Collier - Class of '23 Florida Bar Association - Member Baby Basics of Collier County) Site Manaize Education: High School - Community School of Naples College - BS Business Administration - University of Missou Graduate - Masters Business Administration - University of Missouri Graduate - Juris Doctorate -I Universitv of Missouri Experience / Background I am a Development Associate for Soave Real Estate Group. I manage and support various aspects o new and ongoing real estate development projects for the company, including land acquisition, project valuation, construction, and turnover/operations. Soave Real Estate Group —the real estate operating arm of Soave Enterprises — is recognized as a leader in the real estate industry. The group has a broad portfolio of holdings, including commercial, industrial, luxury and residential properties. Our local portfolio includes communities such as The Dunes, Moraya Bay, and Kalea Bay, as well as the Floridian Club, and The Club at Kalea Bay. I earned my B.S. in Business Administration from University of Missouri in 2015. 1 went on to receive my M.B.A. and Juris Doctorate from the university as well. I was admitted as a member of the Florida Bar in July of 2019, and ultimately returned to Naples to work for Soave Real (Estate Group after previously completing an internship with the company in 2018. A lifelong resident ofj (Collier County, I am passionate about our community and its most vulnerable residents. I volunteer with Baby Basics of Collier County, a 501c3 non-profit, 100% volunteer -based organization that provides and distributes diapers to babies of working, low-income families of Collier and Bonita Springs. I serve as a site manager for the organization, assisting with monthly diaper distributions in Golden Gate City and administrative efforts. Through the support of Soave Real Estate Group, I have also been able to organize various fundraisers, including a community -wide school supplies drive for Grace Place for Families and Children and an employee -relief fund in the wake of Hurricane Ian. I believe that my position and involvement in the construction and development industry, coupled with my legal education, give me a unique and informed perspective on affordable housing, the need for it in our community, and the challenges associated with building it. I hope to have the opportunity to serve on the AHAC and have an input on a huge issue affecting the future of Collier County's growth. Board of County Commissioners 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Name: Home Address: Business Phone: Board or Committee Applied for: E-mail address: Home Phone: Zip Code: Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District, Developer, environmentalist, layperson, etc. How long have you lived in Collier County: How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: Have you ever been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? Yes No If yes, explain: Place of Employment: Do you or your employer do business with the County? Yes No If yes, explain: Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or recommendations made by this advisory board? Yes No If yes, explain: NOTE: All advisory board members must update theirprofile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes No Do you currently hold public office? Yes No If so, what is that office? Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Yes No If yes, please list the committees/boards: Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: Education: Experience: Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent. This application should be forwarded to WandaRodrieuez(i ,colliergounet or by mail or in person to Wanda Rodriguez, County Attorney's Office, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #800, Naples, FL 34112. Thank you for volunteering to serve the citizens of Collier County. Susan J. (Sue) Ryan 7112 Lemuria Circle Unit 304 Naples, FL 34109 (239) 537-5828 sue@sueryan.solutions https://www.linkedin.com/in/suearmstrongryan/ Results -oriented enthusiastic leader combining strategy, business development, strategic relationship, and communication expertise to organizations in highly competitive markets. Consistent track record of successfully delivering long-term brand growth and value. Certified coach for emerging and high potential leaders. * Profitable Business Growth * Strategic Account Executive * Complex Negotiation Expert * Best -Selling Author & Industry Expert Sue Ryan Solutions - Naples, FL Founder * Strategic Problem Solver * Change and Transition Strategist * Mutually Successful Relationship Builder * Keynote and inspirational speaker 2002 to Present At Sue Ryan Solutions we specialize in helping organizations, teams, and individuals thrive during times of change. We teach our clients to create their culture poised to face the challenges of change with resilience and right action in the direction of their goals. Whether you are facing change due to external factors such as market shifts, technology innovation, economic changes - or setting your sights on growth and expansion - understanding the dynamics and psychology of change enhances your ability for success. Our mission is to empower and embolden leaders to maximize the opportunities and potential change will bring. • Certified executive coach and trainer for leaders and emerging leaders committed to business growth and next -level leadership, certified MILD and STLI-360 assessments • International best-selling author of Our Journey of Love, 5 Steps to Navigate Your Caregiving Journey, supporting family caregivers through tumultuous life and relationship changes • Co-author/subject matter expert of two International best-selling books Shine Volume 4 and Rock Your Business, - lessons, stories, and strategies for entrepreneurs to maximize their success • TEDx speaker, Professional keynote, industry expert, workshop, and subject matter expert speaker • Creator of the caregiving in business program: Leadership C.A.R.E.S.r"" — Guiding businesses through the global crisis in family caregiving • Creator of the leadership program: Leadership Through the Dimensions of Changer"' - moving leaders successfully through change, with clarity and confidence, to what's next for them and those they lead • Creator of the family caregiving program and online course: The Caregiver's Journey - tips, insights, and strategies supporting caregivers positively navigating their entire caregiving journey PeopleSoft - Atlanta, GA Sales Director - Strategic Accounts 1997 to 2000 Recruited to PeopleSoft as the industry expert in financial services and healthcare to aggressively grow our presence in these strategic industries. Responsible for major strategic account sales and relationships, as well as strategic industry partnerships. • Expertise in financial services and healthcare industries - developing strategies, streamlining industry acceptance, and speeding industry market share growth • Strategic account experience navigating complex opportunities resulting in annual recognition of top -tier performance, exceeding PeopleSoft goals for software and service revenue, with a 100% client retention rate Page 1 Susan J. Ryan Resume, continued PeopleSoft - continued Sales Director - Strategic Accounts Atlanta, GA 1997 to 2000 • Completed sales in forecasted timeframes through successful complex negotiations including international/multi-entity/multi-partner relationships • Developed and supported mutually successful strategic relationships, increasing predictable results, reducing opportunity timeframes, lowering costs of acquisition and growth Management Science America (MSA) / Dun & Bradstreet Software (DBS) Major Account Executive Atlanta, GA 1981 to 1996 Sales Representative: Selected as sales representative for geographic territory sales to private sector companies across industries. Became recognized as the 'go to' industry expert in financial services and healthcare. Promoted to Major Account Executive, focusing on these industries nationally. • Greater than 80% client retention rate • Annually earned recognition of top-level performance, exceeding sales and service goals • Recognized as top earning sales representative globally • Earned largest single sale in company history at more than $4M; multiple sales exceeding $1M Pre -Sales Consultant: Originally hired into MSA as a systems analyst designing financial solutions. Was promoted as subject matter and industry expert for the global sales team responsible for financial and materials management sales for IBM and Burroughs solutions to new and existing domestic and global clients from mid -size to Fortune 10. Industries included healthcare, financial services, insurance, manufacturing, media, utility, information services and technology. • In partnership with one regional healthcare sales representative, sold a global record -setting 26 suites of financial software in one year. Sold software suites in healthcare and financial services in the same year with all other territory sales representatives. • Beginning with the second year as a pre -sales consultant, annually earned recognition for top -tier performance, exceeding all revenue goals and targets • Twice recognized as #1 global pre -sales consultant • Awarded most outstanding presentation of company message in competition with the more than 150 members of the global sales teams • Selected for the team developing and training pre -sales solution and strategy through - and post - MSA/DBS merger Southern New Hampshire University: 2016 William Woods College- May 1976 • M.A. in Communications, New Media & Marketing • B.S. in Business Menttium: 2011- current • Volunteer mentor to female leaders and emerging leaders Leadership Collier - current • Transformational leadership experience to become effective community leader for our better future. Page 2 Susan J. (Sue) Ryan Founder and Inspirationalist Sue Ryan Solutions Sue's mission is to empower and embolden individuals to maximize the opportunities and potential change will bring. As a speaker, change strategist, author, executive coach, caregiving coach and mentor, she lives this through two passions of her purpose. She guides and inspires leaders and emerging leaders committed to business growth and next -level leadership to be great leaders of themselves and others. She guides non- professional caregivers to become confident, balanced, and supported in all phases of their caregiving journey. Sue specializes in helping individuals and teams thrive during times of change. Working with them to clarify, align, develop, and implement solutions in highly competitive markets, while creating their culture poised to face the challenges of change with resilience and right action in the direction of their goals, they successfully deliver long-term brand growth and value. Whether change is due to external factors such as market shifts, technology innovation, economic changes - or setting their sights on growth and expansion - understanding the dynamics and psychology of change enhances their ability for success. Sue delivers these through her signature offerings Intentionally Navigating Transitions - Leadership Through the Dimensions of Changer', The Prodigy Zone'. Leadership C.A.R.E.S.T'. and The Caregiver'sJourney. Sue's corporate career of more than 30 years was in enterprise application software sales to companies across industries including Healthcare, Financial Services, Information Technology, Manufacturing, Hospitality, and Utilities. She was responsible for ensuring individuals were poised for change and their organizations were positioned for predictable success. While her performance was consistently recognized in the top tier, her most satisfying achievement was her nearly 100% client retention rate. Sue has been in roles of family caregiving support for more than forty years. She's moved from feeling frustrated, overwhelmed, and yes - sometimes frightened - to confident, balanced, and supported, navigating the transitions in her life, her care receivers, and those who support them on their journey. As a speaker, coach, author, educator, and mentor, she shares the lessons, tips, and strategies she's learned to help others positively navigate their caregiving journeys. Sue has been a volunteer mentor of emerging leaders for Menttium since 2011. Sue volunteers in the children's ministry of Gulf Community Church, is a member of the Blue Zone's Engagement Committee, and a passionate technology educator for seniors. Sue is a member of the International Coaching Federation. Through her coaching, Sue earned the John Mattone Platinum -Elite Executive Coach ranking. She brings her more than 40 years experience as a non-professional caregiver for family and loved ones to her volunteer work as a speaker and Community Educator for The Alzheimer's Association, as well as a speaker and volunteer for AlzAuthors. She has authored or co-authored three International best-selling books. Two are in the field of business. Her non-professional caregiving book is Our Journey of Love, 5 Steps to Navigate Your Caregiving Journey. She created the online course The Caregiver's Journey to support caregivers through their entire caregiving journey. Sue recently gave her first TEDx talk. Next stop, the TED platform. Sue's life motto: "Go confidently in the direction of your dreams! Live the life you've imagined." Henry David Thoreau Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee 2023 Annual Work Plan - DRAFT As of April 7, 2023 Section 420.9076(4) of the Florida Statutes states, in part, that the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC)'s work is to "recommend, specific actions or initiatives to encourage or facilitate affordable housing while protecting the ability of the property to appreciate in value. The recommendations may include modifications or repeal of existing policies, procedures, ordinances, regulations or plan provisions; the creation of exceptions applicable to affordable housing; or the adoption or new policies, regulations, ordinances or plan provisions. " The Collier County AHAC believes it's mission includes the responsibilities assigned to it by Florida Statute 420.9076(4) as well as other permissible activities such as the promotion and review of affordable housing plans, programs and incentives. This mission is accomplished through the creation of an annual work plan that defines and guides AHAC's efforts and support of the Board of County Commissioners (BCC.) AHAC's efforts are broadly categorized as encompassing 3 main activities: Promote, Recommend and Review plans, programs and incentives in support of the development and preservation of affordable housing. Current Status as of AHAC Sponsor GMD Staff Liaison April 18, 2023 Next Steps Timeline for Completion promote- AHAC will seek to promote substantive and impactful policies and program through active participation and engagement in the community. Promote support by the community for projects under consideration at Neighborhood Information 1 Meetings. All TBD Ongoing Next meeting dates: TBD Ongoing Promote publication on websites (which ones?) of incentives available to developers of affordable/workforce 2 housing. 1 of 3 4/12/2023 Current Status as of AHAC Sponsor GMD Staff Liaison April 18, 2023 Next Steps Timeline for Completion Promote understanding of local employer needs and 3 plans for workforce housing. Promote construction of workforce housing by positively engaging developers in official and 4 unofficial communications Recommend - AHAC will encourage and positively support the consideration of policies, plans and programs by the BCC that will encourage the development and preservation of affordable housing Recommend and approve updates to the required annual Housing Incentives 1 IStrategy report. Changes were approved by the BCC on March Recommend approval of LDC 28, 2023, with Review and approval by the 2 changes All revisions. State of FL and X. TBD Recommend approval of RF MUD Transfer of 3 Development Right changes Recommend approvals for Accessory Dwelling Units 4 (ADUs) Recommend approval for a non -voting member of the Development Services 5 Advisory Committee (DSAC) Recommend approval for a non -voting member of the 6 Planning Commission 2 of 3 4/12/2023 Current Status as of AHAC Sponsor GMD Staff Liaison April 18, 2023 Next Steps Timeline for Completion Recommend consideration of new affordable housing 7 projects Recommend consideration of changes to impact fee policies to promote construction of more 8 affordable units. Recommend consideration of changes to parking requirements for affordable 9 housing projects. Review - AHAC will review its work by evaluating the number of newly completed and ongoing projects to build affordable housing and incorporate those findings into its future work plans. Review on a quarterly basis 1 the list of ongoing projects Review on a quarterly basis the number of available and 2 occupied rental units Review impact of affordable housing projects that have been completed and are open and make recommendations on any changes to plans, programs and incentives that will improve outcomes in the 3 future 3 of 3 4/12/2023 HOUSING INITIATIVES Growth Management Plan Amendment/ L20210000660 4N16, Board of County Commissioners * r 4W r • March 28 2023 f t • G'6gle.E rt Urban Land Institute Community Housing Plan • March 2016, the BCC directed staff to develop a cohesive, inclusive plan to meet housing affordability needs of the entire county. • July 2016, the 35 members stakeholder group began meeting to research and discuss options that could be utilized in Collier county to encourage the development of housing that is affordable. • January 2017, the Urban land Institute (ULI) was engaged to conduct an Advisory Services Panel to conduct an in-depth investigation into the issue of housing affordability in the Collier County community and provided suggested solutions to deter a future crisis. • October 2017, the BCC reviewed and accepted the CHP and made recommendations to move forward. • February 2018, the suggested solutions were presented to the BCC for consideration and action, staff began implementation of recommendations. Residential Housing included in future county land acquisitions Approved 2/27/2018 New Demand Methodology Implemented 2/27/2018 Increase Advocacy of the Sadowski Act Trust Fund Approved 2/27/2018 Concurrent expedited Review Process Approved 2/27/2018 Impact Fee Deferral Program Amendment Adopted Ordinance 2/12/2019 New Affordable Housing Definition Implemented 2/12/2019 Affordable Housing Density Bonus Amendment Implemented 2/12/2019 Community Land Trust Awarded RFP 10/2019 Marketing/Public Relations/Communication Plan Awarded RFP 10/2019 Local Housing Trust Fund Re-established 6/2020 Regulatory Relief for Affordable Housing Applications Implemented 2/9/2021 Government Wages (BCC approved increases 1/25/2022) Not adopted at time of CHIP approval Minimum Wage (Florida voters approved 11/3/2020) Not adopted at time of CHIP approval Streamlined Commercial to Residential Conversions In Process Incentivize Mixed Income Housing in Future Redevelopment Activity Centers In Process Create Strategic Opportunity Sites In Process Increase Density in CRA and along transit corridor In Process 7 Member BCC Not adopted at time of CHIP approval Simple Majority for AH Zoning Not adopted at time of CHIP approval Rental of Guest houses/ADU Not adopted at time of CHIP approval Hire Community Outreach Coordinator Not adopted at time of CHIP approval Hire Housing Counselor Not adopted at time of CHIP approval Linkage Fee Nexus Study Declined 4/24/2018 Mixed Income Housing Incentive—Inclusionary Zoning Declined 10/9/2018 SB 102 Live Local Act —Passed by Senate (40-0) and House (103-6)— Signed by Governor Require counties and municipalities to authorize multifamily and mixed -use residential as allowable uses in any area zoned for commercial or mixed -use if at least 40 percent of the residential units in a proposed multifamily rental development are, for a period of at least 30 years, affordable as defined in s.420.004, F. S.; )(120 AMI) Prohibits a county or municipality from requiring the proposed multifamily development to get a zoning or land use change, special exception, conditional use approval, variance, or comprehensive plan amendment for the building height, zoning, and densities; Prohibit a county or municipality from restricting the density of a proposed development authorized under these subsections below the highest allowed density on county unincorporated land or land within the municipality respectively, where residential development is allowed (92 units per acre); Prohibit a county or municipality from restricting the height of a proposed development authorized under these subsections below the highest currently allowed height for commercial or residential development in its jurisdiction within 1 mile of the proposed development or three stories, whichever is higher; Co'Llier County Ft25E I R25E R2 2012-2025 FUTURE LAND USE MAP Cdlier County Florida 6ETAI LS OF THE RLSA OVERLAY AREA ARE SHOWN ON THE FUTURE LANE USE MALP TITLE G' 'COLLIER OOUNiY RURAL B AGRICULTURAL AREA ASSESSI IE HT STEWhfiOSHIP OVERLAY hMP' Ulk R 22E R29E It l J R25E I R26E R27E I R28E R 30E RSiE R32E R33E R34E I ,T R29E I R38E R31E I R32E R33E R34E Provision Epe istin Pro osed Subdistrict Title is 1107M. ELVA- • • Applicable Subdistricts LDC Reference Affordable Housing Density Bonus Eligible Zoning Development Standards Maximum Density & Affordability Maximum Portion of Project as Residential Provision I Total # Parcels CMU, Commercial Mixed Use (C-1— C-3) CMU, Commercial Mixed Use (C-4 & C-51 SUMS C-4 and C-5 deemed "Consistent by Policv" Total # I Max. DUs Acres DU Increase Over Existing GMP --- CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL by RIGHT SUBDISTRICT -00MMM � all 1!� � a y.� t Ism win F1. _ T Ai REM 4 L agend All o �m� Per commercial zoning district on the parcel except C-4 capped at 50 feet height All DUs must be Housing that is Affordable — commitment by Agreement required 16 DU/A (URF, UCF, UR) Comparative analysis required to demonstrate proposed residential project has same or less impacts than highest intensity commercial use allowed (vehicle trips, water & wastewater) Within boundaries of East Naples Community Development Plan (generally, along US 41 East corridor and north to approximately Davis Blvd., and 1 mile east of Collier Blvd. west to the CRA boundary), and Downtown Commercial Center Subdistrict in Golden Gate City Sub - Element (most of the Golden Gate Parkway corridor except for the Mixed Use Activity Center) Conversion of • Max. DUs W7Us Increase Over Existing GMP c,) c t- In a In 5.11 n a ■ s MIXED USE b INTERCNANG ACTIVITY CENTER INDEX MAP 1I I G 1n N. 11 Str C AMENOEO - JANUMT 7], ZOOS cocao• Nzoos-as) AMENDED - JUNE 7. 2005 (Or& Nn. 7005-25) AYEIADW - oCfQKA 14. 200E tarn Na 2006-52) AMENDED - SEPIELMR M 2011 (Ora N.. 2011-26) AAKRDED - JUNE 11 2617 1Wd No. 20173� 0 a ma ILI -MMU PO I I O-E. L main No HEM MINE 11-11WOM. 141 a SUR all! in 0 r,84131MM"M MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER/INTERCHANGE ACTIVITY CENTER SUBDISTRICT Eligible Density (DU/A) 16//25 per Mixed -Income Housing Program 1.5/2.5 with TDRs//25 per Mixed -Income HP 4 except per DRS (AHDB of 12 du/a) and B/GTRO)//25 per Mixed -Income Housing Program 16//25 per Mixed -Income Housing Program 4 except B/GTRO//25 per Mixed -Income HP 1.5/2.5 with TDRs//25 per Mixed -Income HP 16//25 per Mixed -Income Housing Program 1.5/2.5 with TDRs//25 per Mixed -Income HP 104 370 9,248 4,789 pti 4 � rn s Ro 1MMOKALEE RD E IMM0KA IEE RD z I :"4 ow..., o.rr •wow awr.. ar • S1 IRINE RIDGE RO EXT x DAVIS BtV❑ 175 m w } h 1 U Q L n T q��q�fT O T4AffAMf 1E,' ' r�� Vacant Properties within ram BT C0Yi11ty - Artenal Road Urban Area of FLUE. GGAMP and TAMP (10 acres and up fronting arterial Road) Growth Management Department Vacant Properves in Urfa•nArea A Operations a Regulatory (10 aeries and up fronting wtenal road) i4�77 Management Dion Urban Area of FLUE. GGAMP Miles and IAMP Map Dace: &12r-lm 0 1.6 3 6 STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY SITES (SOS) SUBDISTRICT ProjectMinimum Access Requirement Arterial Road ZoningRequired PUD Required Qualified Target Industry Businesses (QTIB) and Housing that is Affordable Optional Uses Support commercial uses (C-1 thru C-3) and market rate housing Density10/25 DU/A — based on total site acreage DensityBase density: 4 DU/A. Additional density (up to 25): requires Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement. Affordability requirement: min. 20% of DUs at Low and/or Very Low income levels. Density bonus is doubled when dedicated for Low or Very Low income levels. Mixed Use RequirementsQTIB: min. 40%/max. 80% Residential: min. 20%/max. 60% Support commercial: max. of 20% Other provisions Compatibility, integration of uses, ensure percentage thresholds are met 7 181 2,714 408 a -1 n� w_t—s , GR eJ[ E P i DY IWR fE p W-dW Sww RD p� ^w~aaw eLYDw SON -Ow ILY1 E 'R 5 LML 4T{ Y a �d CAP-T County Tryi M M] Growth Management Dep.ft n t u.arn wea: �r�cwx: u»rn Rr:acrra Furor, linen 0 Op-6.nsE Reg.Wt y C--s crapea'WML u.0 Et!!rw 0=1 n00-1 t.';•:. Mdnagement Division uqr Rmx _ ldip D7:e. _: 1 _ TRANSIENT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT SUBDISTRICT UCF & URF in FLUE; Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict in GGCS-E; Commercial Mixed -Use Subdistrict & Recreational Tourist Subdistrict in IAMP 13 DU/A max. 12 DU/A max. 25 DU/A Multi -Family only Per those in proposed LDCA; compact and pedestrian oriented TOD, Transit 60 1,121 14,579 (market rate 8,847 Oriented only) 28,037 (with 15,385 Development affordable housing) 10 Housing Initiative Totals 301 1,121 14,579 (market rate only) 28,037 (with affordable housing) 1,770 27,549 (market) 41,007 (with affordable) 8,847 15,385 Notes: 1. DU = dwelling units. 14,22 1 2. All provisions are applicable to Future Land Use Element; TOD is applicable to Immokalee Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan's Golden Gate City Sub -Element as well. 20,764 3. For TOD, 22 parcels (37%) and 966.7 acres (86%) are in Immokalee. 4. Aggregation of parcels could potentially increase the acreage of SOS and TOD. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition PL20210000660 and direct staff totransmittal to the Department of Economic Oppertunity. Co'Llier County Transmittal to the DEO & Other State Agencies Collier County Planning Commission Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners Adoption Hearing Compliance Finding by the State Questions? r� Recommendation b Neighborhoods, Inc., Items 11B & 11C) I1W4O[NII11WAA/ ''UJ lu/_XI A' approve First Amendment to Developer Agreement with Rural to develop Housing at the former Golden Gate Golf Course. (Companion to OBJECTIVE: To modify the Developer Agreement so that it coincides with the Ground Lease negotiated in present market conditions for the development of Essential Services Housing at the former Golden Gate Golf Course. CONSIDERATIONS: On December 13, 2019, the County publicly advertised ITN No. 20-7698. On June 9, 2020, the Board selected Rural Neighborhoods, Inc. (Rural Neighborhoods), and directed staff to begin negotiations. On November 10, 2020, the Board approved the negotiated Developer Agreement. The proposed amendment: 1) Removes 1.64 acres of greenway from the leased area; and 2) Clarifies unit breakdown in Exhibit B; and 3) Clarifies construction timeline. Leased Premises in Exhibit "A" The area to be used by Rural Neighborhoods is proposed to be reduced by 1.64 acres (25 acres to 23.36 acres) to remove the greenway. This reduction will result in County maintenance of the greenway as part of the golf course. This increased cost to the County is nominal. Unit Breakdown in Exhibit `B" Rural Neighborhoods will build at least 350 units as originally set forth in the Developer Agreement. The ESP units will continue to be rented as originally approved with priority given to two tiers of Essential Service Personnel. Tier 1 will include individuals who work in the Healthcare, Education, and Emergency Services sectors; Tier 2 will include Government employees. The following table illustrates the rent levels and number of units, as proposed to be amended that will be targeted within this development. EXHIBIT B 'nit Totals and T�-pes N�Lr rnurn Number of Umts Maximum lumber of Units (011•erall) 350 ( .`erail) 372 T et Number of Ser4or Units 100 Tamet Number of Sena or Urnts ZW120 Target Number of Essential 250 Target Number of Essential J�W252 Services Units ser4.ices Units Note: Five percent (5YO of &,mor andFssenrial Services units shall he targeted to persons considered to be veterans. Income and Rent Tal'geting (Goals) Seniors Income Target Rent Percent Minimum # Maximum # Note: Developer may elect AMI Level Set -Aside of Units of Units to use IRS §42 Inconte- Averaging as a set -aside election in 4% or 9% 3028% 3028% 10% 10 NSA 12 60% 60% 90% 90 N/A108 Housing Credit transactions. Its election enables income levels to be set -aside between 60% - 80%AMI, balanced by units set -aside beloiv 60%. Essential Services Income Target Rent Percent Set- Minimum # Maximum # Note: All units shall be AMI Level Aside of Units of Units rented with priority given to Essential Service 6050% 60°�50% 8416-9% 20-22 24-22 Personnel employees. 80% 80% 259% 11% 63-29 7-5 28 ESP Occupational i 0001/0 8"0 57-OA I-42 1,74 120% 100% O9/s-80% 0-200 0202 Preferences include: Tier 1: Healthcare, g 0 4-"0 2-5 39 Education and Emergency Services Tier 2: - Government Schedule of Milestones The amendment updates the schedule of milestones as follows: Milestone Deadline Provide a Construction Timeline Within 60 days of the effective date of the amendment. Secure Project Funding Allocation Up to 12 Months from the latter of the effective date of the Lease or the effective date of final approval of land use as evidenced by PUD approval. Deadlines may be extended at the discretion of the County Manager or designee up to six months, without the necessity of obtaining approval of the Board of County Commissioners. FISCAL IMPACT: The County's investment into this project is roughly $5.5 million considering the cost of the land and zoning work required for the property. As provided when the Developer Agreement was approved on November 10, 2020, funding for the acquisition of the land, approximately $5.5 million, for the Long -Term ground lease is planned to come from the Infrastructure Sales Surtax Fund. Rent and related revenue generated from the project will first cover the developer's debt service for capital construction, operating costs, and reserves. Should there be excess funds generated by the project, these funds will be allocated back to the County's Local Affordable Housing Trust Fund and a housing trust fund at the Community Foundation based on a pro rata share from the initial investment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Providing land for the development of housing that is affordable assists the County in addressing some of the goals and objectives of the Housing Element in the Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality and requires a majority vote for Board action. -JAK RECOMMENDATION: To approve First Amendment to Developer Agreement with Rural Neighborhoods, Inc., to develop Housing at the former Golden Gate Golf Course. Prepared By: Cormac Giblin, Interim Economic Development & Housing Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve Collier County Standard Form Long -Term Ground Lease with Rural Neighborhoods, Inc., to develop Housing at the former Golden Gate Golf Course. OBJECTIVE: To implement the Developer Agreement in furtherance of the development of Essential Services Housing at the former Golden Gate Golf Course. CONSIDERATIONS: On December 13, 2019, the County publicly advertised ITN No. 20-7698. On June 9, 2020, the Board selected Rural Neighborhoods, Inc. (Rural Neighborhoods), and directed staff to begin negotiations. On November 10, 2020, the Board approved the negotiated Developer Agreement. A companion item to this item is an amendment to the Developer Agreement. The Collier County Standard Form Long -Term Ground Lease ("Lease") is consistent with the developer agreement, as amended. Notable terms: 1) Nominal rent 99- year term lease of 23.36 acres at former Golden Gate Golf Course. 2) Development to be phased with Rural Neighborhoods required to submit plans, specifications and building to County for approval. 3) Rural Neighborhoods to provide a timeline of anticipated schedule for each Phase to County. 4) Rural Neighborhoods may terminate Lease if cannot secure a financial commitment for the initial phase within 12 months from the latter of the effective date of Lease or the effective date of the PUD approval. 5) Rural Neighborhoods is required to diligently pursue construction and complete construction within 30 months from the commencement of construction. Deadlines may be extended at the discretion of the County Manager or designee up to six months, without the necessity of obtaining approval of the Board of County Commissioners. Unit Breakdown in Exhibit `B" Rural Neighborhoods will build at least 350 units as originally set forth in the Developer Agreement. The ESP units will continue to be rented as originally approved with priority given to two tiers of Essential Service Personnel. Tier 1 will include individuals who work in the Healthcare, Education, and Emergency Services sectors; Tier 2 will include Government employees. FISCAL IMPACT: The County's investment into this project is currently $5.5 million considering the cost of the land and zoning work required for the property. As provided when the Developer Agreement was approved on November 10, 2020, funding for the acquisition of the land, approximately $5.5 million, for the Long -Term ground lease is planned to come from the Infrastructure Sales Sur -Tax Fund. In addition, at the Board's prior direction, staff is continuing to evaluate the appropriate combination of impact fee incentive programs to offset the impact fee assessments for the project. These include the Collier County Impact Fee Deferral Program and Revolving Payment Program, and Section 163.31801 (11), Florida Statues, pertaining to impact fees for Affordable Housing. Staff will work with the County Attorney on the appropriate instrument and approval process for future Board consideration. Rent and related revenue generated from the project will first cover the developer's debt service for capital construction, operating costs, and reserves. Should there be excess funds generated by the project, these funds will be allocated back to the County's Local Affordable Housing Trust Fund and a housing trust fund at the Community Foundation based on a pro-rata share from the initial investment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Providing land for the development of housing that is affordable assists the County in addressing some of the goals and objectives of the Housing Element in the Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality and requires a majority vote for Board action. -JAK RECOMMENDATION: To approve Collier County Standard Form Long -Term Ground Lease with Rural Neighborhoods, Inc., to develop Housing at the former Golden Gate Golf Course. Prepared By: Cormac Giblin, Interim Director Economic Development and Housing Division 1 W4 OLIN I A' Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign a State Housing Initiative Partnership Sponsor Agreement between Collier County and Rural Neighborhoods, Incorporated in the amount of $1,500,000 for new construction of rental housing units at the Golden Gate Golf Course, and authorize the County Manager or designee to execute any and all SHIP -related restrictions for this property in accordance with this agreement and project. (SHIP Grant Fund 791) (Companion to Items 11A & 1111) OBJECTIVE: To continue to promote affordable housing strategies for very low-, low-, and moderate -income persons through the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP). CONSIDERATIONS: The William E. Sadowski Affordable Housing Act provides funding to local communities to promote and advance affordable housing initiatives. The County has established its SHIP Program in accordance with sections 420.907-.9079, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 67-37, Florida Administrative Code. Funds are generated through documentary stamp tax on real estate transactions. Under the SHIP Program, Collier County and the City of Naples receive funds from the State of Florida through the Florida Housing Finance Corporation to undertake eligible activities. On April 26, 2022, (Agenda Item #16D3), the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted the SHIP 2022-2025 Local Housing Assistance Plan (LHAP). This LHAP includes the Rental Development Strategy. The Rental Development strategy allows the County to use SHIP funds to support for -profit or non-profit organizations to construct new rental units within Collier County for income -eligible renters. This SHIP strategy is designed to support landlords/owners who have site control of land to build single-family, multifamily, or mobile/manufactured rental units on scattered sites or within a rental complex. Annually, the Community and Human Services (CHS) staff advertise an application cycle to secure organizations to implement SHIP strategies. The application cycle was from January 6, 2022, through February 11, 2022. CHS received a total of thirty (30) applications and four (4) were for SHIP -eligible projects. On March 10 and 11, 2022, the Review and Ranking committee met to review all applications. The committee selected Rural Neighborhoods -Golden Gate Golf Course Housing project for award. This project was one of the highest-ranking projects and received full funding. The agreement with Rural Neighborhoods will support permits fee, pre -development, and construction costs to support fifty (50) SHIP -assisted units within the two -hundred and fifty-two (252) unit development. Rural Neighborhoods will provide twenty-two (22) Very Low -Income and twenty-eight (28) Low -Income units. The property will be income and rent -restricted for thirty (30) years to ensure long-term affordability. The Rural Neighborhoods will be responsible for providing/executing a Land Use Restriction Agreement, Promissory Note, and Mortgage for an affordability period in favor of Collier County, pursuant to the FY 2022-2025 approved LHAP. Because the County is the project landowner, SHIP required restrictions for the property may need to be executed by the County, potentially in conjunction with the Sponsor, for this agreement and project to be in compliance with County and SHIP policies and Florida Statutes. Therefore, staff is requesting that the Board authorize the County Manager or designee to execute any and all SHIP related restrictions for this property in accordance with this agreement and project. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $1,500,000 are available in SHIP Grant Fund (791), Project 33807. The proposed action does not have any impact on the General Fund. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved for form and legality and requires a majority vote for Board approval. -DDP GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Acceptance of these agreements will allow the County to expand affordable housing opportunities for its citizens and further the goals of the Housing Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: To approve and authorize the Chairman to sign a State Housing Initiative Partnership Sponsor Agreement between Collier County and Rural Neighborhoods, Incorporated in the amount of $1,500,000 for new construction of rental housing units at the Golden Gate Golf Course, and authorize the County Manager or designee to execute any and all SHIP -related restrictions for this property in accordance with this agreement and project. Prepared By: Lisa N. Carr, Senior Grants Coordinator, Community and Human Services Division ORDINANCE NO.2023- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REZONING THE CARLISLE NAPLES AND THE SOUTHERLY ADJACENT PARCEL TO ALLOW GROUP CARE, CARE UNITS, NURSING HOMES, ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES, AND CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES USES WITH A MAXIMUM 0.65 FLOOR AREA RATIO AND UP TO 336 MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO A MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO BE KNOWN AS THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD ON 27.78f ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE AND AIRPORT ROAD IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION 96-405, A CONDITIONAL USE ESTABLISHING THE GROUP CARE FACILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PL20220001042) WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, of Hole Mantes, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing SRG CN FL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Johnson Development Associates, Inc., a South Carolina corporation, Charles E. Herring, Todd W. Ward, Whitley S. Ward, John E. Crimmel, Jr., as Attorney -in -Fact for Sharon T. Crimmel, as Trustee of the Sharon T. Crimmel Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1987, Cynthia Crimmel, as Successor Trustee of the John E. Crimmel [22-CPS-02259/1775506/1162 The Haven at North Naples MPIID Page 1 of 3 PL20220001042 3/13/2023 CAO Declaration of Trust dated October 2,. 1987, and Susan W. Wright, Trustee of the Susan W. Wright Revocable Trust U/A/D May 15, 2019, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) for a 27.78t acre parcel to be known as The Haven at North Naples MPUD in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Repeal of Conditional Use Resolution. Resolution No. 96-405, a conditional use for a group care facility is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2023-_ becomes effective. [22-CPS-02259/1775506/1162 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 2 of 3 PL20220001042 3/132023 C.9 O PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Derek D. Perry NM Assistant County Attorney A) Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit D — Legal Description Exhibit E — Deviations Exhibit F — Developer Commitments 2023. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Rick LoCastro, Chairman [22-CPS-02259/1775506/11 62 The Haven at North Naples WUD Page 3 of 3 PL20220001042 3/13/2023 70 EXHIBIT A THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES Regulations for development of the MPUD shall be in accordance with the content of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the MPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. I. Tract A Permitted Uses A. Principal Permitted Uses. 1. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to § 429.02 F.S. and Ch. 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to Ch. 651 F.S. and Ch. 690-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC Section 5.05.04 at a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.65 for Principal/Accessory Buildings. 2. Any other commercial or professional use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or HEX, pursuant to the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, subject to I.A.I. above, including, but not limited to: 1. Indoor Accessory Uses including the following: Administrative Offices; Housekeeping; Public Restrooms; Coat Room; Main Dining Room; Private dining; Central Kitchen; Library; Game/Card Rooms; Business Center; Billiards Room; Arts Studio; Beauty/Barber Shop; Resident Social Director's Office; Receiving Room; Nurse Practitioner's Office; Auditorium; Exercise Studio; Physical Therapy; Physician Office; Locker Room and Showers; Massage/Spa Therapy; Beauty Salon (AL & SNF); Exercise Physiologist Office; Resident Services Director's Office; Resident Services Staffs Office; Sales and Marketing. The aforementioned uses are only available to residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor Accessory Uses including the following: Parking facilities; covered loading dock; guard house; outdoor recreational facilities such as swimming pool and deck and similar facility; walking trails; signs and water management facilities; hardscape, [22-CPS-02259/1777114/11133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 1 of 1 I PL20220001042 3/132023 ('S 9 O seating, trellis and decks; lawn games — croquet, badminton and lawn bowling; deck and trellis; putting greens; courtyard, garden and landscaping; maintenance building. II. Tract B Permitted Uses A. Principal Permitted Uses 1. Multi -family dwelling units, not to exceed 336 total dwelling units (12.10 dwelling units per gross acre). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, including, but not limited to: 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents (and their guests) of Tract B, such as swimming pools, fitness centers, dining facilities, sports courts, and clubhouse/recreation buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to multi -family units, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, signage, entry gates and gatehouse, administrative offices, and similar structures. 3. Additional and/or offsite puking for Tract A. 4. Temporary sales facilities may be permitted. [22-CPS-02259/1777114/I] 133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 2 of 11 PL20220001042 3/13/2023 a7 O EXHIBIT B HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for the uses within Haven at North Naples MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TRACT B TRACT CLUBHOUSE/ TRACTA MULTI -FAMILY RECREATION CROUP CARE, ETC. BUILDINGS' PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MIN. LOT AREA 10 Ac. N/A l0 Ac. MIN. LOT WNTH 150' N/A 150' MIN. FLOOR AREA 1 700 S.F./DU N/A N/A MINIMUM YARDS MEASURED FROM THE PUD BOUNDARY NORTH, ADJ TO ORANGE BLOSSOM DR. FRONT YARD N/A N/A 307 NORTH, ADJ TO AG ZONED PARCEL SIDE YARD 20' 20' N/A SOUTH SIDE YARD 30' 30' N/A EAST FRONT YARD 30' 30' 30' WEST YARD 50" 50' 30' MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK° 25' 25' 25' MIN. LAKE SETBACK' 0' 0' 0' OF THE ZONED/OF THE ZONED OF THE ZONED MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDING HEIGHT BUILDING HEIGHT BUILDING HEIGHT OR STRUCTURES OR AS REQ. BY FIRE OR AS REQ. BY FIRE AS REQ. BY FIRE CODE, WHICHEVER CODE, WHICHEVER CODE, WHICHEVER IS IS GREATER I IS GREATER I GREATER MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT ZONED 55' NTE 4 STORIES 35' NTE 2 STORIES 40' MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT ACTUAL 60' 42' 45' MAX. FAR GROUP HOUSING N/A N/A 0.65 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MEASURED FROM THE PUD BOUNDARY NORTH, ADJ TO ORANGE BLOSSOM DR. FRONT YARD N/A N/A SPS NORTH, AD] TO AG ZONED PARCEL SIDE YARD SPS SPS N/A SOUTH SIDE YARD SPS SPS N/A EAST FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS WEST REAR YARD SPS' SPS SPS MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK' 10, 10, to, MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES SPS SPS SPS MAX. HEIGHT ZONED 20' 20 20' MAX. HEIGHT ACTUAL 25' 25' 25' SPS = Same as Principal Structures; NTE = not to exceed; S.F. = square feet; BH = building height. Faomo es, I. If clubhouse/recreation buildings are located within a multi -family building, the required setbacks shall be the same as multi -family. 2. These setbacks shall be applicable if the preserve is located on -site. 3. Measured to the lake maintenance easement. 4. Single -story garages (NTE 20' in height) and trash enclosures shall be setback no less than 30'. [22-CPS-02259/1777114/11133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 3 of 11 PL20220001042 3/132023 O0 .J TABLE II: PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS Direction Buffer Tvue North, adjacent to Orange Blossom Dr. 20' Type D North, adjacent to A zoned property 10' Enhanced Type A South 10' Type A East, adjacent to Airport Pulling Road 20' Type D East, adjacent to CPUD and A zoned parcels 10' Type A West, within Tract A 10' Type A West, within Tract B 15' Enhanced Type B [22-CPS-02259/1777114/11133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 4 of 11 PL20220001042 3/13/2023 OVO 15VS EMEMO£ tso'unulr FPSEMENT Oq.GZre.PG. R6a3 CURRENT/PROPOSED ZONING: A/MPUO O:R.=7 PG. i'1J t6A, FASEMEM ZONINGA 0.P.3em, PG.Ts0 aP 1^4s. Pc. JHI USE: COLLIER C0UNIY LIBRARY CURRENT/PROPOSED FLU DESIGNATION: URBAN O R.zmz Pcn HEADQUARTERS BRANCH I RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT I AIRPORT CARLISLE MIXED USE — — — — SUBDISTRICT ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE I PROPOSED LAND USE SUMMARY i, i TRACT A: 13.21 AC. RIGHTTURN 0NLY(Exisling, --- 20'TYPE'D"LBE __ ZONING CPUD(ITALIAN AMERICAN CLUBHOUSE) > v..m o I TRACTS: 14.5]AC. TOTAL 27.78 AC. CPUisIM Uss only) ma' FvnLenseMeHt/ USE: ITALIAN AMERICAN 1 O.R. Tzw, PG. N1R CLUB NAPLES I A LANDSCAPE BUFFERS !� v I ZONING PUD NORTH: ADJACENT TO ORANGE BLOSSOM DR.: 20'TYPE D 1DTYPE W WE Q I I (LONGVIEW CENTER) NORTH: ADJACENTTO A ZONED PROPERTY 10'ENHANCED TYPEA � U TRACT A �� 100' FE4LESWOR.Ml.PG. I USE: RETAIL NURSERY c SOUTH: 10'TYPEA EAST: ADJACENT TO AIRPORT PULLING ROAD TYPE D G EAST: ADJACENT TO CPUD 3 AZONED PARCELS IU TYPE VULLH ZONING F WEST: WITHIN TRACT A 1V TYPE O Z w ui USE: UNDEVELOPED O WEST: WITHIN TRACT B. 15' ENHANCED TYPE B u 0 O Q 10' TYPE W LEE g OPEN SPACE M In w w MIN. REQUIREDIPROVIDED'. 30%=B.33 AC. ENHANCED ? yN loavval =_�_= 10'TYPE A' LEE NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVED Z o EAGBJENT ------------ --dbM1v4L EGMT T I MINIMUM REOUIREDIPROVIDED(25%): 0.39 AC. N 0R 201, M. G.R. 2414.PG. 1Ns PURSUANT TO LIDO SEC. 3.05.07A.M.. THE DEVELOPER SHALL MRIGATE THE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT OFFSR`E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DONATE x1.56 AC. (x0.39 ts.a EBMT o.R 4S.PG. 33B9 AC x 4) TO COLLIER COUNTY 0R TO ANOTHER t0".... GOVERNMENT AGENCY. 0. O.P.i3i6. PG. SNi ZONING PUD (SUNSHINE 1g.a TEMP. ESTMREDOe-(=o====________ O.R. Noy PG. 03W ZONING MAXIMUMB: OEN VILLAGE) °�--- ------- —-------- —�� - - ___ ____ Lio,M.PG,BFJAEW (NAPLES VIEW) VIEW ITYANTENSITV TRACT B: DENSITY 336 MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS STORMWATER 00..tx0. Pc. u4t I USE: SINGLE FAMILY TRACTa:IWENSITV(EXISTINGALF):MAXIMUMFMOFO.65 MANAGEMENT LAKE �15 ENHANCED TYPE'B'LBE RIGHT I RESIDENTIAL TRACT B TU DEvunoNs ONLY eDEVIATION --- IT ENHANCED TYPE 'B' WE 2O TYPE 'D"USE 35' -- I(GROUP HOUSING) SEEKS RELIEF FROM UDC SEC.S.OS.O4.D.I, GROUP HOUSING. WHICH STATES THE I IT TYPE"A" lg,ORAM1WCEUTILPYIM , MAX. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) FOR ALFIGROUP HOUSING ESMT. O.R, WB vG 11..A L..lq $HALL NOT EXCEED 0.45, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR ZONING RSF-1 I MAXIMUM FAR OF 0.0 USE: SINGLE FAMILY EMERGENCY 1� 1S' DRARIAGE ESMT. ZONING PUD ADEVIATION 2(BUFFER REQUIREMENTS) SEEKS RELIEF RESIDENTIAL VEHICLES ONLY Oa3E]0. vG n.vMGELBJOB (LONE OAK) FR0M LIDO SECTION 4.00.02- BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, USE: OFFICE TABLE 2.4, WHICH REQUIRES A ISWIDE, TYPE 36'IMGREANEGRESS ESMT-. PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE THE PROPOSED oO iesl, vG�sss li BFAR CREEKDPIVE __ 1 MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT IS ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL USES TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR A 10' FOOT _ —----- WIDE TYPE A PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN ZONING PUD (BEAR CREEK) USE: I THESE USES. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL I -INDICATESLANDSLAPE BUFFER AREAS THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES m mmp 0 EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN O Page 5 of I I Gr EXHIBIT D THE HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PARCEL NO.00238040007) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 2°14'00" WEST 1049.41', THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST I/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, SOUTH 89°51'42" WEST 100.07TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 31 AND THE PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED;. THENCE CONTINUING PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, SOUTH 89-51'42" WEST 1250.68' TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 1°57'50" WEST 347.75; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 89-51'42" EAST 1249.04' TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROUTE 31; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 2°14'00" EAST 347.75' TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; BEING A PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1.4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PARCEL NO.00238240001) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, NORTH 02 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 1397.16 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 100.02 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD (CR. 31) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 602.51 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, 646.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 972.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 584.37 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, 660.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 660.26 FEET TO THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, 311.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. [22-CPS-02259/1777114/11 133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 6 of 11 PL20220001042 3/13/2023 OA. EXHIBIT E HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation 1 (Group Housing) seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.13.1, Group Housing, which states the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for ALF/Group Housing shall not exceed 0.45, to instead allow for a maximum FAR of 0.65. Deviation 2 (Buffer Requirements) seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 — Buffer Requirements, Table 2.4, which requires a 15' wide, Type B perimeter landscape buffer where the proposed multi- family development is adjacent to commercial uses to instead allow for an enhanced, 10' foot wide Type A perimeter landscape buffer. [22-CPS-02259/1777114/1] 133 'Me Haven at North Naples WUD Page 7 of 11 O PL20220001042 3/13/2023 Q V EXHIBIT F HAVEN AT NORTH NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The purpose of this section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. I. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for MPUD monitoring until close-out of the MPUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all MPUD commitments until close-out of the MPUD. At the time of this MPUD approval, the Managing Entity is Johnson Development Associates, Inc. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell offtracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the MPUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of MPUD commitments. B. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. Development of the subject property shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections and parts of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan (SDP), excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. D. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. [22-CPS-02259/1777114/11133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 8 of 11 PL20220001042 3/13/2023 Q, U II. TRANSPORTATION: A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the MPUD shall not exceed 343 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. The multi -family project in Tract B shall not have access to Orange Blossom Drive through Tract A. III. PLANNING: A. The developer of any group housing, including a retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to compliance with LDC Section 5.05.04 (with the exception of the deviation granted from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.I to allow a maximum FAR of 0.65), and subject to the following operational standards for the units in the group housing, including, but not limited to, independent living units, assisted living units, or skilled nursing units: Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing cue unit: i. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; ii. There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; iii. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents' needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; iv. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; v. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; vi. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; vii. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bus. vii. Group housing for seniors shall be constructed to have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site in the event of a hurricane. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that are required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities ("State Requirements for Educational Facilities, 122-CPS-02259/1777114/11133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 9 of 11 PL20220001042 3/13/2023 PO 2014") and shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up generator for a period of no less than 96 hours. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. The minimum required native preservation is f0.39 Ac. (25% of 1.55 Ac.). Pursuant to LDC Sec. 3.05.07.11.11, the developer will mitigate the preservation requirement off -site or via payment -in -lieu. If mitigated off -site, the developer shall donate f1.56 Ac. (f0.39 Ac x 4) to Collier County or to another government agency. B. A listed species management plan will be provided for Eastern Indigo Snake and Big Cypress Fox Squirrel, as well as any other listed species found on -site at the time of development approval. The management plan will address how listed species will be protected, including the listed plant species observed within the development footprint. V. AFFORDABLE HOUSING A. To achieve the 336 dwelling units, the MPUD shall commit to the following: 38 units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and an additional 38 units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the AMI for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. B. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units. Of the income restricted units, including rent data for rented units, and homestead data for owner -occupied units, in a format approved by Collier County Community and Human Services Division. Developer agrees to annual on -site monitoring by the County. VI. OTHER A. Enhancements to the northern perimeter buffer within Tract B shall consist of shrubs a minimum of ten gallons in size, four feet in height, spaced a maximum of four feet on center at the time of planting. B. Enhancements to the western perimeter buffer within Tract B shall consist of a concrete block and stucco wall eight feet in height. The required landscape buffer plantings will be located on the western portion of the wall. C. With respect to the perimeter landscape buffer along the south property line, where said buffer incudes a portion the Collier County Drainage Easement (OR 2870 PG 11): [22-CPS-02259/1777114/11 133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 10 of 1 I PL20220001042 3/13/2023 CPO i. No required landscape buffer plantings shall be located within the portion of the buffer that is encumbered by the County's Drainage Easement; and ii. Prior to Site Development Plan (SDP) submittal, the developer shall coordinate with the Collier County Landscape Architect to identify the types of plantings that will meet the LDC requirements for this buffer, while reducing root impacts and/or excessive growth of such plantings on the infrastructure (pipe(s)) located in said Drainage Easement. [22-CPS-02259/1777114/11 133 The Haven at North Naples MPUD Page 11 of 11 PL20220001042 3/132023 CAO