HEX Final Decision 2023-04HEX NO. 2023-04
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
February 9, 2023
PETTTInN
PETITION NO. BD-PL20220000501 - Request for a 2.75-foot boat dock extension and
boathouse from the maximum permitted protrusion of 25 percent of the width of the
waterway or 20 feet into a waterway, whichever is less, to allow construction of a boat
docking facility protruding a total of 22.75 feet into a waterway that is 91f feet wide,
pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06. The subject property is located at 231 Dolphin Cove Court
and is further described as Lot 8, Dolphin Cove, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25
East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The Petitioner is requesting a U-shaped dock, accessed by a 4-foot-wide walkway, with two boat
lifts; one to moor a 32-foot vessel that will be covered by a boathouse and a second serving two
12-foot personal watercraft. The dock facility will protrude 22.75 feet into the 91±46ot wide canal
and the required 15-foot side/riparian setbacks will be satisfied on both sides of the docking
facility.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
Page 1 of 7
5. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner's expert, public comment
and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative. There were no objections
made at the public hearing.
6. The County's Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.H. lists the criteria for dock facility
extensions. The Hearing Examiner may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a boat dock
extension request if it is determined that at least four (4) of the five (5) primary criteria, and at
least four (4) of the six (6) secondary criteria have been met.'
Primary Criteria:
Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation
to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property.
Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are
the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be
appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-
family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island
docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject property is located within an RSF-3 Zoning District that will
support a single-family dwelling, Building Permit No. PRBD20211049219, for which this
section of the LDC allows up to two boat slips. The proposed dock facility consists of a U-
shaped dock, accessed by a 4-foot-wide walkway, with two boat lifts; one to moor a 32-
foot vessel that will be covered by a boathouse and a second serving two 12 foot personal
watercraft.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or
moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish
that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s)
described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
NOT BEEN MET. The reason for this BDE request is based on the existing rip -rap
shoreline which includes a 10 foot Conservation Easement (CE) and mangroves. Water
depths within the allowed 20 feet are restrictive but are not the sole reason for this BDE
request.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an
adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. There is no marked or charted navigable channel at or adjacent to the
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 7
proposed project location. Therefore, no marked or navigable channels will be affected by
the proposed project.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the
waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the
required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. As per the Specific Purpose Survey provided by the applicant, the subject
canal width is between 91 feet and 95.2 feet, MHWL to MHWL. As per the proposed dock
plans, sheet 04 of 10, the dock facility will protrude 22.75 feet into said waterway as
measured from the most restrictive point. It can therefore be established that the proposed
dock facility will occupy 25 percent of the 91 foot waterway. Sheet 10 of said plans reveals
47feet between the proposed dockfacility and that on the opposite shore; therefore, 51.65
percent of the canal remains open for navigation.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would
not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock facility design, less the boathouse, is like the existing
docks to both the east and west; each accesses the primary (shore parallel) slip from the
west and has an ancillary (perpendicular to shore) slip on the eastern side. Additionally,
the proposed dock facility is setback 44 feet or more from each of the neighboring
side/riparian lines. There should be no interference with neighboring docks.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed
dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these
may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,
or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject property has three special conditions: a rip -rap shoreline,
protected mangroves, and a 10 foot conservation easement. Staff notes that Environmental
Planning Staff does have concerns with the subject conditions and has resolved to satisfy
those concerns at the time of permitting; therefore, they have requested a specific condition
of approval requiring removal of the rip -rap from the easement prior to their obtaining a
Certificate of Completion.
Page 3 of 7
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not
directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed docking facility design has been fully minimized and still
provides routine access to the vessels as well as provide an area for recreational activities
for fishing and storage of kayaks and paddleboards. The noted recreational area is
minimal, measuring only 8 feet by 19 feet.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's
linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject docking facility has been designed to accommodate a 32 foot
vessel, LOA, and two 12 foot PWCs with a maximum combined length of 56 feet; the
subject property's linear waterfront footage is 140± feet.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of
a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The dock facility does not encroach into side riparian setbacks that help
protect waterfront views of neighboring properties. The dock facility is consistent with
others along the waterway and abutting properties. The companion boathouse will not
exceed the allowed maximum height of 15 feet and the boathouse will be open on all four
sides.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds
are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring
properties within 200 feet of the existing dock structure.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section
5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion is
NOT APPLICABLE. The proposed project is for a single-family residential boat dock
facility. Section 5.03.06.E.11, Manatee Protection Plan, is not applicable to this boat dock
proposal.
Page 4 of 7
Standards for Boathouses.
1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen Feet.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET As per the provided Dock Plan, the boathouse is setback more than 1 S feet
from both the eastern and western side/riparian lines.
2. Maximum protrusion into the waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet,
whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway
beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. Cross Section AA indicates that despite there being a roof overhang, said
roof will not extend beyond the footprint of the proposed dock facility.
3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever
is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The tip of the uppermost portion of the roof is 1 S feet above the fixed dock.
4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. Only one boathouse is to be built on this property.
5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The boathouse will be completely open on all four sides.
6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the
principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling
unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction
of any boathouse or covered dock structure.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The roofing material and color of the proposed boathouse will match that
of the principal structure.
7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the
view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical.
Page 5 of 7
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The boathouse is located within the required side/riparian setbacks and will
be obscured by existing mangroves.
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06.1-1
of the Land Development Code to approve Petition. The Petition meets 4 out of 5 of the primary
criteria and 5 out of 6 secondary criteria, with the six criterion being not applicable. As for the
boathouse, this petition satisfies all seven of the required boathouse standards.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BDE-PL20220000501, filed by Jeff
Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. representing The Lens Family Trust, John F. and Lori -
Ann Lens, Trustees, with respect to the property described as 231 Dolphin Cove Court, further
described as Lot 8, Dolphin Cove, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier
County, Florida, for the following:
• A boathouse and a 2.75-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion
of 25 percent of the width of the waterway or 20 feet into a waterway, whichever is less,
to allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a total of 22.75 feet into a
waterway that is 91± feet wide.
Said changes are fully described in Proposed Dock Plans attached as Exhibit "A" and Specific
Purpose Survey attached as Exhibit "B" and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Proposed Dock Plans
Exhibit B — Specific Purpose Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
Lot 8, Dolphin Cove, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. The riprap located within the Conservation Easement must be removed prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Completion for the dock facility's building permit; and
Page 6 of 7
3. A Certificate of Completion for the dock facility, an accessory structure, cannot be issued
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the residence, the principal structure
on the subject property.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPF,ATA—
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT "A"
ST,ATF— C)F FLC3F,*IE:),A
SUBJECT 1 \ 4
PROPERTY
NAPLES
c
r,
o
n m
m
9 � s1
MARCO
ISLAND
GULF OF ME)OCO
Ab'TAI
PA
2 s FT.MYJR
Bg AM
8 1 g g
D
v
iQ
2GDES
CITY
TM KEY WEST
COLLIER COUNTY
SUBJECT
PROPERT
SITE ADDRESS:
<> 231 DOLPHIN COVE CT <> LATITUDE: N 26.324098
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 <> LONGITUDE: W-81.829413
NOTES:
<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
VICINITY MAP
DESIGNED: JR I.
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. 231 D O L P H I N COVE C T DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. _ _
CREATED: 10.31-22 3.
Marine &Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 21205.00 4.
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO.: 01 OF10 5.
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RYNO. 5875 -- SECTION-05 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE- 25E
r«:
TRACT"'
1
ERVATIC
� n
X-8.7 Xb.7 Xb.7
� m
MANGROVE
FRINGE LINE
_ �.
IIIII
X$4 Xb.3 ,409.3 X431 � -�' 4
-B 0 (-7.3 -- -0 X-7.3 Cb.9 X-7.0
Xb.3 :.6.6 - .5 -5.0 X.5.7
X 5.5 X-5.4 X-5.3 5.5 J-5.2 4.6
�(-3.8 .3 -2.3 -2Af
rI.
MLW = -0.5' ^4.4
MHW = +0.0'
NORTH EDGE OF MANGROVE
ROOT LINE
w_ SITE ADDRESS:
1 231 DOLPHIN COVE CT
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134
•� PROPERTY
® BOUNDARY
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. 2 3 'I
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 6434166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 IRY NO.5875
it 44,
I
2
X 3.5
w
1�
N
<Xe
>
s
0 20 40 Bo
SC�Lr 7N ��7
6w
2
X 3.5
w
1�
N
<Xe
>
s
0 20 40 Bo
SC�Lr 7N ��7
6w
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."
•
• SURVEY DATED: 01m09-22
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 140
IXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 91'
TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAND)= +0.0'
MLW NAND = -0.5'
DESIGNED: JRMJ
1F
O L P H I N C O V E C T CREATEDY R21
031-22 3.
JOB NO.: 21205,00 4,
EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET NO.: 020F10 5T,
SECTION -OS TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
•
i
'
8
0
m
-8.0
X -8.0 X
X -3.8
I
q -2.9
DECKED
OVER BOAT
LIFT
X -8.8X -8.8
oe
X -6.3 ,. Soo/ I
'-4.3 .�
3 I 34
0
9'
a
t
W,
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
1 `-- PROPERTY
1 BOUNDARY
�4.0
� / "'BOAT LIFT
X -8.4 .5
v -3.4
^4.7
MLW = -0.5'
MHW = +0.0'
5\5
N
A�._.
— --� � `ri%
L__ o +0 20 40
SC?(GE 9N ;rfET
X -8.4
NORTH EDGE OF
4MANGROVE FRINGE LINE
-7.2
v 0 X -5.7 4 X -5.3
� .0
- I TRACT "E"
10
CONSERVATION
X 3.5
NOTES:
•
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES
ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
•
ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE
REFERENCED TO MLW
•
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."
••
SURVEY DATED: 01-08.22
•
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):
140
•
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):
0
•
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):
91'
•
TIDAL DATUM:
••
MHW (NAVD)= +0.0'
•'
MLW (NAVD)= moos'
•
PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):
900
•
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):
900
•
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:
22.75'
DESIGNED: JR 1,
Tune , Ha &Associates, Inc. 2 3 'I � O L P H 1 N COVE C T �R TEDv RO-31-22 3: - -
Marine &Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 21205,00 4,
3584ExchangeAve. Naples,FL34104-3732 PROPOSED SITE - DEPTHS SHEETNO.: 030F10 s. _ _
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643=6632 RYNO- 5975 SECTION-05 TOWNSHIP— 48 S RANGE— 25 E
f
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
N
N
'PROPOSED
BOAT LIFT
— PROPOSED
BOATHOUSE
ROOF TO
HAVE AN 1811
38'
32'
N
33'
50'
34'
EXISTING
RIPRAP
PROPOSED
BOATHOUSE
(15' X 330)
NORTH EDGE OF MANGROVE
ROOT LINE
PROPOSED
BOAT LIFT
N
An..,
e-M- 0
1 � 1
s
a ro 20
RIPARIAN LINES
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE,
ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."
•
• SURVEY DATED: 01-09-22
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 140
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 91'
TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAVD)= +0.0'
-0 •• MLW (NAVD)= .5'
• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 900
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 900
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 22,75'
DESIGNED: JR 114
4w
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 231 D O L P H I N COVE C T DRAWN TEDv 11031.22 3: _
Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 21205,00 14,
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 PROPOSED SITE - DIMENSIONS SHEET NO.: 04 OF 10 15, 1 1 1 1 _
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643-6632 , , s T„FqF nRAW1Nr.9 OnR PFRMOmNnMMPZERONLY AND .RFNnT,,,,E"DEO,n"rn"�.R„r.„nN SECTION-05 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
„
a 3 +o
SCF(l� 9N SET
NOTE: ROOFING MATERIAL AND
COLOR SHALL BE THE SAME AS THAT
USED ON PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
24'
22.75 PROTRUSION FROM MHWL
BOATHOUSE
ROOF
FIXED �
DOCK 4'
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 IRY NO.5875
18"
15'
fi fi fi fi
- 'BOAT LIFT -
3'
FIXED DOCK
RIPRAP
= MHW = +0.0' NAVD
MLW = —0.5' NAVD
55
� ALL PILES TO BE WRAPPED
FROM 12" ABOVE MHWL TO
BELOW SUBSTRATE
�OLPH I N T
E C
CROSS SECTION - AA
DESIGNED:
DRAWN BY
SECTION -OS
TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
N
0
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
NO SEAGRASSES WERE
OBSERVED GROWING
WITHIN 200 FT OF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT
PROPOSED
DOCK
1 #
TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT � -� r'
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 231 DOLPHIN COVE CT
Marine & Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RV N0.5875 TM= = Aew ^a.A==^aP=a m ^o,aP^ F=^ •• ^<A= ^T^ _ =^A=^ =n^
N
�-
JUWLL
s
o f5 30 6o
SC7{L'7: 7N �EE7
TRANSECT
SEC
TION-OS TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
jai
NA
w: *�
i~ w�
. i 4
Nod1- �\01 at
'10, \\
' Nu 1 VIPt.
O ~ i
W A co i
Lam "Na
��
42
.:iJT:.Y r �rR Ii
PROPOSED N
DOCK
y
�r
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
4.
IN No
A -.
BXE� >
VNI
..;e:
0 510 f00 200
SCF(C�7N �EE7 ,
foil' .
r kf s t :k 1_AqKrTI , ""dam t'= rt` '�jh 7 #�+ 4 Ti '^
dt
_01 `t F7 1d7�Ir
t/� rrA ads y y..
t NOTE. t x` ,
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE `
NJ b
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE. ` .
IN
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 231 D O L P H I N COVE CT DESIGNED JR =
L {.., DRAWN BY' RMJ
Marme & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 31-22 3.
JOB NO.: 21205.00 4.
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 ADJACENT DOCKS SHEET NO.: OBOF 0 s.
Email: tuna@thanaples.com PhoDe:(239)643-0166 Fax:(239)643-6632 RVNO. 5875 SECTION-05 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
Ed 1�16
IF_
Ed
�: I I
Ed
,..
Ed, Ed
Ito
Ed
At
Ed
c r 0 0 f00 200
r•
EE
R P ®ttp+7@�r SCFlLZ9NrFzZ7 r
ED
re
ob
'.y
ja
2'_ x Gs t y > Y 1 ; _ N _ a +.^ ' ' fib
f
nnrk
f
fi PROPERTY
dt BOUNDARY .a
ST OVERLAY
j -
r •{- �!
Ed
WE
eE
`(^f
w1 SI � 1 ` y ; tot.
y
ilk 'f i. . IM
c'!(fy�' ^ (�' R. _'ti �,, ,ti l�[ �,� h µ1Yy' •1 M
Is
i a * ` j E r t4 u t: d
Y A
Ap
,
DESIGNED: JR 1.w
Tunell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 2 31 D O L P H I N COVE C T DRAWN 1RMJ 2 = _ -
Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 21205.0CREATED: 1205..00 4.
,
3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 EST OVERLAY SHEET NO.: 09OF10 Is.
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643-6632 RYMn] A,S*aF9F�A,�urg,p,.na„aM,mN,,,,,aonSFgnN,,,Mn,AFNOT ,h.FNnFPFOR C,.NIE.a„rMn„„gF SECTION-05 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
EXHIBIT "B"
SCALE 1" = 30'
91'+- MHW
2 TO MHW CANAL
=DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION
ADJUSTED TO
X-8.2 X-8.2 X-8.31-8.3 X-8.3 X-8.1 -82
X7.5 X-7.9 X-7.8 X-7.8 X-7.6
x-6.8
x x-4.8 rcn N89-3200-E f
RIPARIAN LINE
TRACT "E" -8.2 x
10'CONSERVATION -
EASEMENT -7.5:
ADJACENT DOC
& BOATHOUSE 11.6
LOT 9
140.00'
if 1 '- - - -1 17.3'(
20.3' --f----___A JACENT DOCK
LIII -__J I
92'+ MHW
RIPARIAN LINE TO MHW
X-7.9 X-8.0
X -7.4X -7.9X -7.6X _7.6
X-6.8 X-6A
x -ss x s.7
VY 7 "J�.-4.5 X-5241 X-4.8
1.3'CONIC
\SEAWALL CAP
(0.5' TO PANEL)
(MHW LINE
UBUTS PANEL FACE)
ADJACENT DOCK
& LIFT(ACCESS
FROM THE NORTH)
�X
26.7'
MLW LINE. ...
TOEOF
.0. ELEV.=-0,6
O OF TIE -LINE ONLY BANK)RIPRAP
T./
BANK/RIPRAP N89.2751"E
FO SPIKE
FD SPIKE 132.45' (M)
(No m m
(NO ID N) _ - _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
z X=TOP OF BANKIRIPTAP
SPOT ELEVATIONS (NAVD'88
LOT 7
W,DO
(VACANT)
W o
p
On
W, LOT 8o
On W
0
LOT 8 CONTAINS 0.37 ACRES m
m
OF LAND MORE OR LESS. >o
w
1(YU.E. N'
_m
.- `c
FIRC 5r8'
(NOID#I t
°HOBO, QHo
U` i FIR SIB• A4)FIRO
o
O, (NO ID k) -� FIR S'8"�- .--- Ci2
p,a� '-(No ID k) c
SAY
(NO ID k)
o C3 CHORp17^W
57819
31 54 lN1)
v;
CURVE TABLE ,`pm
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD DIR HOR
C1 72.42 253.97 18"2013" $87.00'13'W 72.17 U1 / FPKN&D
C2 4368 300.00 8'00'05" S78.10'21'W 3t.41 �p �i (j� (NO:OI)
C3 43.68 50.00 62°33'46- S73.32'36'E 4154 'Q\ /
C4 5206 40.00 59°38'46" N72.05'06'W 4873 `p CL DOLPHIN COVE CT
A �y
(TRACT "B")
(40' WIDE R.O.W.)
(ROADWAY, C.U.E.)
NOTES:
1 THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED
ON THE CENTERLINE OF DOLPHIN COVE COURT
AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 19 PAGE 56
OF COLLIER COUNTY, BEING SOUTH 31"07 54" EAST
2.IMPROVE MENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN
ARE NOTA PART OF THIS SURVEY.
'.SAID DESCRIBED LAND IS SUBJECT TO ALL SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, ZONING AND
RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF RECORD.
4DATE OF FIELD SURVEY JANUARY 7, 2027
5.THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE
AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR
AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS
OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR
PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES.
63UBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE
NOT EXAMINED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO STATEMENT
IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND
OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS, UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT
MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY.
TELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON NA.V.D. DATUM OF 1983.
DESCRIPTION OF BM AS FOLLOWS: SET SM SPKN&D 98004
IN Z VALLEY GUTTER AT CENTER OF LOT 8 ELEV. - 4,73'
11.THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE EXISTING
SHORELINE CONDITIONS & BAT)1YMETRIC IN RELATION THE THE.
PROPERTY LINES ARE SHOWN AS PLAT.
O.SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE WA
AS SHOWN ON FEMA MAP PANEL k
ISLAND. BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED AT N.'A
ALL FEMA INFORMATION SHOWN NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED BY THE
USER(S) OF THIS SURVEY, BEFOREANY DESIGN AND)OR
CONSTRUCTION.
10.NO TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPLIED
BY THE CLIENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE DEEDS.
EASEMENTS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS (RECORDED OR
UNRECORDED) WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE
SURVEYOR,
REVISIONS
LEGEND
O = FOUND C) IRON ROD ( SURVEYOR ID In (FIR)
Q-SET 1/Y' IRON ROD (PSM *e004)(SIRC)
. = SET 4" X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM 00004)(SCM)
nEl �- FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR ID k)(FCM)
V- BENCHMARK (FOUND OR SET) RAN- RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.WJ
O - FOUND NAIL OR PK NAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR ID k) (FPKN)
@-SET PK NAIL AND DISC (PSM #8004) (SPKN&D) FD.-FOUND
FN&TT- FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB BM -BENCHMARK
(M)- FIELD MEASUREMENT (C)- CALCULATED MEASUREMENT
P.C.P. - PERMANENT CONTROL POINT (9) C.L. CENTERLINE
P.R.M.= PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT(#) (PG) - PAGE
(P) OR (0) - PLAT OR RECORDEO(DEED) MEASUREMENT
(P8) • PLAT BOOK PL EXT - PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED
Cr.1P CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CAN-CABLETV
F-FINISHEDFLOOR U.T.S.• UNITED TELEPHONE RISER
•WELL CONIC -CONCRETE CB -CATCH BASIN OR INLET
= WATERrGATE VALVE RO P. -REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
S . SANITARY SEWER PROP -PROPERTY X- SPOT ELEVATION
OB-TOP OF BANK TOS-TOP OF SLOPE EOW-EDGE OF WATER
SOS- BOTTOM OF BANK SOS - BOTTOM OF SLOPE EO - EDGE OF
CBS -CONCRETE BLOCK& STUCCO VG•VALLEYGUTTER
ELEC.-ELECTRIC TRANS -TRANSFORMER JAC-JACUZZI
DE- DRAINAGE EASEMENT SV42- SIDEWALK EASEMENT
LBE -LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT IE - IRRIG. EASEMENT
PUE - PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT UE - UTILITY EASEMENT
LMA(E)- LAKE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT
LME • LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT A E.- ACCESS EASEMENT
MAP OF
.IFIC PURPOSE SURVEY
OF
LOT 8
OF
DOLPHIN COVE
AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 19 PAGE(S) 55-56
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
231 DOLPHIN COVE COURT
CERTIFY TO:
TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES
CERTIFICATION;
I CERTIFY THATTHIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER SJ-17,
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION
472,027. FLORIDA STATUTES.
IOTA CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR
Digltaliy signed by
Court Gregory
ON:<n=Court Gregory,
odourt Gregory
-- - - SSmeyln9 In,, ou,
mall=CgS6OD4@coMC
ast.net,-US
Date:2022.0824
07.04:15 -04'00'
COURT H. GREGORY PSM #6004
DATE 08/11/2022
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 01-07-2022
PSM # 6004
LB # 7112
C#44.
Gregory Surveying,
761 Teton Court
Naples, Florida 34104
(239)643-7845 office Date 08/11202.2
egs6004@comcast.net Job #V61BS0051M
(239)272-3707 cell Fb VB-5 Pgs 37-38