Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 2/14/2023 Item #17A (The Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development to change the affordable housing income levels from at or below 60%)
17.A 02/ 14/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 07-34, as amended, the Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development to change the affordable housing income levels from at or below 60% of area median income to up to and including 120% of area median income; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 100f acres, is located on the north side of State Road 29, just east of Village Oaks Elementary School, and approximately two miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and County Road 846 in Sections 12 and 13, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220003938] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners ("Board") review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), a Habitat for Humanity project, was approved for 400 residential dwelling units on a 100± acre property or 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) in 2007. (See Attachment B-Ordinance 2007-34.) The PUD includes a commitment that all units will be sold to households earning at or below 60% of the area median income (AMI). The PUD was not subject to an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement as the PUD density is well below the maximum permissible density of 8 DU/A. The petitioner proposes to increase the maximum threshold of 60% AMI ($61,300) to 120% AMI ($113,160) to broaden the range of people who can be served by affordable housing (See Attachment "E" to see specific income limits associated with percentage of AMI and household size). The petitioner is also incorporating a recent insubstantial Master Plan change that relocated an amenity center and two scrivener's errors that were approved in 2008 and 2010 into the PUD Ordinance. (See Attachment A -Proposed Ordinance.) FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Amendment (PUDA) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUDA is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUDA and the subject petition is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard Petition PUDA-PL20220003938, Kaicasa RPUD on January 5, 2023, and voted 5-0 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. There have been no letters of opposition received, therefore this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District for a project known as Kaicasa, a Residential Planned Unit Development. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Packet Pg. 1513 17.A 02/ 14/2023 Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider Conformity of the proposed PUD Amendment with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Amendment be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Amendment result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Packet Pg. 1514 17.A 02/ 14/2023 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD Amendment on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD Amendment request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for Petition PUDA-PL20220003938, Kaicasa RPUD. Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report 12-2-22A (PDF) 2. Attachment A -Proposed PUD Ordinance - 010623 (PDF) 3. Attachment B-Ordinance 07-34 (PDF) 4. Attachment C-NIM Summary 11-22-22 (PDF) 5. [Linked] Attachment D-Application 1-3-23 (PDF) 6. Attachment "E" Collier Income -Rents - 2022 (XLSX) 7. legal ad - agenda ID 24282 (PDF) Packet Pg. 1515 17.A 02/14/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.A Doe ID: 24282 Item Summary: This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 07-34, as amended, the Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development to change the affordable housing income levels from at or below 60% of area median income to up to and including 120% of area median income; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 100f acres, is located on the north side of State Road 29, just east of Village Oaks Elementary School, and approximately two miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and County Road 846 in Sections 12 and 13, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220003938] Meeting Date: 02/14/2023 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 01/06/2023 1:33 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 01/06/2023 1:33 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Mike Bosi Division Director Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Diane Lynch Growth Management Department James C French Growth Management Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Ed Finn CMO Completed Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 01/09/2023 8:37 AM Completed 01/10/2023 9:03 AM Completed 01/10/2023 2:26 PM Completed 01/10/2023 7:53 PM Completed 01/27/2023 4:42 PM Completed 01/30/2023 9:22 AM Completed 01/30/2023 9:26 AM Completed 02/01/2023 9:11 AM 02/02/2023 6:10 PM Completed 02/08/2023 10:26 AM 02/14/2023 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1516 17.A.1 TO: FROM: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: i Co ii -r County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION JANUARY 5, 2023 PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Owner: Agent: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Amanda Martin, AICP c/o Lisa Lefkow Johnson Engineering, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34113 Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider amending Ordinance No. 07-34, as amended, the Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development to change the affordable housing income levels from at or below 60% of area median income to up to and including 120% of area median income, and providing an effective date. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 100± acres, is located along the north side of State Road 29, just east of Village Oaks Elementary School, and approximately 2 miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and County Road 846, in Section 12 and 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD Page 1 of 10 December 2, 2022 Packet Pg. 1517 Wand BSB31BN - 8£6£000ZZOZ-ld - u014118d 6UIUOZ : Z8ZVZ) `dZZ-Z-Z� :podau }Ie}$ :}uauayoelid 0 F � J p � 4 0 U. 3 a M a W 0 0 R a ,I r i■ i i. iW Wte • ■ Q 2 0) C_ -C 0 N 0 0 N N 0 J a. N z C> 0} Lf C 0 J PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD Page 2 of 10 December 2, 2022 17.A.1 GGLL#le w+4 HOLO##Qis. LTu Cii TeYE ,ram hPl BVFFR — R � — LME I Fp' TYPE 'A'' I I R I 9LIF3�8 I I I HIGH CZL., RE5 1.1E AG XxtCF ' I R% I R + —w r R x L IV TWE -a• I I OufPER I I +MEERVE ' I i G7LL�ER C9VHTY I 14CUSNO FARWOORKER-A 1 YA4rY4i IT r� 1•L4E 'g' 4 I I Y rPR y I I zir .� -2t AC I I R r R I I %i I HIL1H RE91DIEhTUY 7O FYPE 'R' WAFM D 125- 250' MW SCALE' 1' - = HO-DflC& LTO AbMD LAW USE KEY t>�SInFNiW4L ITiI 'Sim Pum1YT, NIYCMd ar -r.p Fe m7& - sera LA 4fn nupwx -UrAftmi� {'Qnurrpn %r -Open Smarr -N[W Mryyrr rdj Wen -r41 La1 Receeueon �SrEF L.�GEr+IB PAEaEm AMk OMkreh YVMdjVLfhT AFWL — RRQiSur�aaar IM�IK-0F�iSY fEtu,ClMrmx.,c ouc�cr,},.ygw Lllt AMAOMPw DMNCLAWWKAIw PROOJECTIAND ME REBEMA11ALUSEAIREA L.AKr 4.0l� AiG= PRGWRVE' w. re AC; ROALLSMO W 12 fs 8 x lOTI.LNET rRfAM ICO. WOACx M' RWC1JSJAMA 25.'AACx W14IM MNW-M tFlAGQ0 x} d>41.1pA1= 4M LWFEW10D AC. - i k*M 12E)t ACRE Mr.? MASTER FLANMM 1. ofW�lhdl M t*& tli.l rl PMM M Wtk i— I;,j u pLbyg sv.r� [h hum;*�a,o-"6pi . 1-d plr.,�Nrua ialH aw emar Yidnlpr Ef{} gp-p , h I,[5xLlxd Ww I it WO mak, pn [YrD 3c mrrMda,d w.cepr[L b l !.T'Mkohln1mh"aFdra%waisshenikdm.�I or�60•ai4 �. the �i uA %l�hlw,� O'r 111 lMo-a`arR4-Am ie pi;.b RuE #9 itLE he � � xlA Jae FkA& Zkp*ty o�ii TPVA— J. WM&the ILA►RFM.%60 .a w—apm F. LUI6e rk.r..0 r�r-ner +'bok de,i+OpsA[L A miniocn r{a Y4�[ VrEttulQp dwI b� lMLLYd ar.rM. q W,lr�ld P•ex,w ud ,plYd ;re,elrx�m ..;.�•�;.,;,. �1th Culllsl Cap [end ?k In7R•rm raLk 9Rx'�, SiRi4ia 71 " } CDC Uu,B PARTWMSMP ]t ., l,F IrffE9lli�kidlid. 'A 6MWM OF 30.0 ACKS VkL ICE DDJW.AWD FOR TK Py,fpg DF ffi£$E V 1 CAN TRACTS LW THE PRAL DEMM ANO PLJITWG. EAr49EME7yT A LMIMUM OF 24.11 ACRES 5 FrECURFD PER THE LDC riAln%% WEXIAT5M FhC1EWB1 N REWIRLIJCn7 ON %TL LUHIiE81pEMiV; Revised. June 22, 2022 2350 WANFOR6 L1,L*rT i A RC D 434-0333 ENGINEERING E`a #S AIL& 05 COT 7MG 28p ilE{i 1i-4y-2F 9' -00 F.JH161F Q PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD December 2, 2022 Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 1519 17.A.1 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Kaicasa PUD, a Habitat for Humanity project, was approved for 400 residential dwelling units on a 100± acre property or 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) in 2007. (See Attachment B-Ordinance 2007-34.) The PUD includes a commitment that all units will be sold to households earning at or below 60% of the area median income (AMI). The PUD was not subject to an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement as the PUD density is well below the maximum permissible density of 8 DU/A. The petitioner proposes to increase the maximum threshold of 60% AMI to 120% AMI to broaden the range of people who can be served by affordable housing. The petitioner is also incorporating a recent insubstantial Master Plan change that relocated an amenity center and two scrivener's errors that were approved in 2008 and 2010 into the PUD Ordinance. (See Attachment A -Proposed Ordinance.) SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Vacant land with a zoning designation of Agriculture -Mobile Home Overlay (A -MHO) East: Vacant land with a zoning designation of Agriculture -Mobile Home Overlay (A -MHO) South: State Road 29, a two-lane Principal Arterial road, and then Vacant land with a zoning designation of Agriculture -Mobile Home Overlay (A -MHO) West: Farmworker's Village, a residential development with a zoning designation of Residential Multi -family (RMF-6) and Residential Single-family (RSF-4) PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD December 2, 2022 Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 1520 17.A.1 AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.02.13 B.S., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the Collier County Planning Commission's (CCPC) recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD December 2, 2022 Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 1521 17.A.1 for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Zoning and Land Development Review: Zoning staff has reviewed the petition and recommends approval of the proposed PUD Amendment. As previously stated, the PUD includes a commitment that all units will be sold to households earning at or below 60% of the area median income (AMI). The petitioner proposes to increase the maximum threshold of 60% AMI to 120% AMI to broaden the range of people who can be served by affordable housing. Housing Review: Housing staff has reviewed this petition and has no objections to modifying and increasing the income targeting from 60% to 120% of AMI. The income targeting under the original PUD was provided voluntarily by Habitat and was not in exchange for additional density. Therefore, housing staff recommends approval of the proposed PUD Amendment. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.S., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map, and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as undeveloped lands to the north, east, and south. Land to the west is developed with residential land uses. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD December 2, 2022 Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 1522 17.A.1 At the time the subject property was rezoned to a PUD, it was deemed to be of sufficient size and did not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change this finding. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to increase the maximum threshold of 60% AMI to 120% AMI to broaden the range of people who can be served by affordable housing. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD Amendment will have no impact on living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed PUD Amendment will have no impact on traffic. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The overall drainage system is in place. The proposed PUD Amendment will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Amendment will have no impact on light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed PUD Amendment will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD December 2, 2022 Page 7 of 10 Packet Pg. 1523 17.A.1 The proposed PUD Amendment will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed PUD Amendment will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed Amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed PUD Amendment will not change the existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed PUD Amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change the existing land use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change the degree of site alteration which would be required. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change the impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD December 2, 2022 Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 1524 17.A.1 To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change the type and pattern of development. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has found this petition consistent with the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change the previous finding that the landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. This PUD Amendment will not change the project's compatibility, both internally and externally. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project remains unchanged and meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change the previous finding of adequate available public and private improvements and facilities. PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD December 2, 2022 Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 1525 17.A.1 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change the previous finding of the ability of the subject property and surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed PUD Amendment broadens the income levels served and meets the public purpose by providing a range of housing ownership opportunities at affordable levels to serve the community. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on November 21, 2022, at Lipman Family Farms Conference Room, located at 306 East Main Street, Immokalee, Florida. A supportive future resident attended the meeting along with the Agent's team, the Applicant, and county staff. For further information, see attached Attachment C NIM Summary. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on December 2, 2022 RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA- PL20220003938, Kaicasa RPUD to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B: Ordinance 2007-34 Attachment C: NIM Summary Attachment D: Application PUDR-PL20220003938, KAICASA RPUD Page 10 of 10 December 2, 2022 Packet Pg. 1526 17.A.2 ORDINANCE NO.2023 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07-34, AS AMENDED, THE KAICASA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO CHANGE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME LEVELS FROM AT OR BELOW 60% OF AREA MEDIAN INCOME TO UP TO AND INCLUDING 120% OF AREA MEDIAN INCOME; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 100f ACRES, IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROAD 29, JUST EAST OF VILLAGE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 29 AND COUNTY ROAD 846 IN SECTIONS 12 AND 13, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20220003938] WHEREAS, on March 27, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 07-34, which established the Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, the PUD was amended by Ordinance Nos. 08-15 and 10-35 and administrative minor master plan change in PL20220004449; and WHEREAS, Amanda Martin, AICP, of Johnson Engineering, Inc. representing Habitat for Humanity, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance 07-34, the Kaicasa PUD, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Amendment to Section 5.4, Schedule of Development/Monitoring Report and Sunset Provision, of the Planned Unit Development Document, attached to Ordinance No. 07-34, as amended, Kaicasa PUD. Section 5.4, Schedule of Development/Monitoring Report and Sunset Provision, attached to Ordinance No. 07-34, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: [22-CPS-02273/1762964/ 1160 Kaicasa /PL20220003938 Text added is underlined; text deleted is struGk thFough. 1 of 3 1 /6/23 Packet Pg. 1527 17.A.2 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION &A. All of the dwelling units constructed within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be committed to occupancy by income restricted households ° earning up to and includin lg 20% of the median aiiatial househeld ineeme Area Median Income (AMI) in Collier County at the time of construction. Covenants and restrictions shall be applied to all of the dwelling units within the Kaicasa RPUD to ensure affordability of all dwelling units for a period of at least €fifteen thirty 0-54 (30) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). As part of the annual PUD monitoring reportthe developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of the affordability commitment. E.B. By the time building permits for 100 residential units are issued, the developer shall have constructed at least one playground area in the location shown on the RPUD Master Plan. SECTION TWO: Addition of Section 5.9, Miscellaneous, to the Planned Unit Development Document, attached to Ordinance No. 07-34, as amended, Kaicasa PUD. Section 5.9, Miscellaneous, is hereby added to the PUD document attached to Ordinance No. 07-34, as amended, as follows: 5.9 MISCELLANEOUS "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F S issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create anrights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. [22-CPS-02273/1762964/1160 Kaicasa /PL20220003938 Text added is underlined; text deleted is stFaGk through. 2 of 3 1 /6/23 Packet Pg. 1528 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 12023. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Un Rick LoCastro, Chairman [22-CPS-02273 / 1762964/ 1160 Kaicasa /PL20220003938 Text added is underlined; text deleted is struck through. 3 of 3 1 /6/23 Packet Pg. 1529 17.A.3 61$g101172j3a /� "� 3 N -, Q0 0 ti o ti, �Ol28=f�9ZSZb2���1, ORDINANCE NO. 07- 34 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURE WITH MOBILE -HOME OVERLAY (A -MHO) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS KAICASA (RPUD) LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROAD 29, JUST EAST OF VILLAGE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND APPROXIMATELY 2 MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 29 AND COUNTY ROAD 846, IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 100± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Laura Spurgeon, AICP of JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC., representing HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 12, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agriculture Mobile -Home Overlay (A -MHO) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District known as Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development in accordance with the RPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. Packet Pg. 1530 17.A.3 SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this J 7 day of 0 6- r ?- L L , 2007. ATTEST: '5.6' y DWIGHT�'-BRO ,CLERK Wpu+ Clerk o�.�'�y to Cher 1 t ewn Approyed aR` IfotPn and legal sufficiency Marjori . Student -Stirling Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: J ES COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This ordinance til with thl 5ecr terry of S ate'stOffice the and acknowledgemenj,of tho film received ifiis _ der, of k' Z f) oea„�y erk Packet Pg. 1531 17.A.3 Community Development and Environmental Services Division KAICASA RPUD /1 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE KAICASA RPUD, A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 PREPARED BY: JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FL 34112 DATE REVIEWD BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL Exhibit "A" Packet Pg. 1532 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 0 M LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES 0 0 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE jj o N N O SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP & DESCRIPTION I -I through I-2 N J a SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT II-1 through II-2 p SECTION III RESIDENTIAL AREAS III -I through D1-3 r a0 am SECTION IV PRESERVE AREAS IV-1 through IV -I c 0 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS V-1 through V-3 N N 0 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS VI-1 N It M ti O d U C IC C L le W E Q E U fC Q Packet Pg. 1533 17.A.3 LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT I Location Map EXHIBIT 2 RPUD Master Plan TABLE 1 Project Land Use Tracts Page II-1 TABLE 2 Development Standards Page I11-2 Packet Pg. 1534 17.A.3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The subject property consists of 100+ acres of property in Collier County, Florida, and will be developed as a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to be known as the Kaicasa RPUD. The property is located within the Immokalee Planning Community. The proposed development will consist of up to 400 residential dwelling units in the form of single-family attached or detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex, or multifamily housing. The proposed development will be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for the following reasons. 1. The subject property is within the Immokalee Urban Area, as depicted on the countywide Future Land Use Map, and is designated High Residential District on the Immokalee Area Master Plan (TAMP) Future Land Use Map. According to the IAMP, the purpose of the High Residential District is to provide for a district of high density residential development. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi -family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. A density less than or equal to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. The proposed residential development is consistent with the parameters described in the IAMP for the High Residential District, and satisfies Objective 1I.1 of the IAMP. 2. The proposed road and sidewalk system for the project provides for movement of pedestrians, motorized, and non -motorized vehicles consistent with Objective VI.I of the IAMP. In accordance with GMP Future Land Use Element Policy 7.3, location of a proposed interconnection point with the adjacent Farmworkers Village property is shown (FLUE) on the master plan. 3. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. The proposed residential project will be consistent with the only existing adjoining development which is the Farmworker's Village residential project to the west. The Immokalee Future Land Use Map designates property to the north, east and west as High Residential and property to the south as Low Residential. The proposed development will be consistent with all these designations for future use of surrounding properties. 4. The project development shall comply with stormwater quality and quantity standards described in the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. The site is designed to include preserved native vegetation, consistent with Goal IV of the IAMP. 5. The projected density of 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) is in compliance with the IAMP based on the following relationships to required criteria: Density per High Residential designation on Immokalee Future Land Use Map 8 DU/A Affordable housing density bonus 8 DU/A (100% are for low income households) Permitted density 16 DU/A PROPOSED DENSITY 4 DUTA 400 units on 100+ acres (gross acreage for residential use) 6. The provision of affordable housing in this development is consistent with Goal I of the Housing Element of the GMP and Goal III of the IAMP by creating affordable housing for residents of Collier County, including low and moderate income persons, rural residents, and farmworkers. The proposed project increases the number of affordable housing units to meet the housing needs of the County which is consistent with Objective 1 of the Housing Element. 7. All final Iocal development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance in accordance with Policy IL 1.2 of the IAMP. ii Packet Pg. 1535 17.A.3 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Kaicasa RPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property, being 100+ acres, is described as: That portion of referenced parcel 8 in Section 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, and that portion of referenced parcel 8 in Section 12, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, described in O.R. Book 2153, Page 1901, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 4" by 4" concrete monument found marking the Southwest comer of said Section 12; thence North 02°13'13" West along the West line of Southwest 1/4 of said Section 12, a distance of 2670.91 feet to a 4" x 4" concrete monument found marking the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 12; thence North 02°13'27" West along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 12 , a distance of 179.09 feet' thence departing said West line, North 87°46'47" East a distance of 1235.30 feet; thence South 02"13'13" East along a line 1235.30 feet East of and parallel with the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 12 a distance of 4193.59 feet to the Northerly maintained right-of-way line of State Road No. 29; thence North 45°03'20" West along said Northerly line a distance of 730.92 feet; thence North 44°55'22" West to an intersection with the Westerly line of said Section 13, a distance of 1088.66 feet; thence North 02°19'02" West along said Westerly line, a distance of 7.56 feet to the point of beginning LESS AND EXCEPT THEREFROM all right, title and interest of the Grantor, if any, in and to the oil, gas and minerals of every kind or character located in, on or under, or that may be produced from said property. A site location map is provided as EXHIBIT 1. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the ownership of: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Section 12, Township 47 South, Range 29 East and at the northwest corner of Section 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East. The project entrance is along the north side of State Road 29, just east of Village Oaks Elementary School, and approximately 2 miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and County Road 846. B. The zoning classification of the subject property prior to the date of this approved RPUD Document was A -MHO, Rural Agricultural with Mobile Home Overlay. I-1 Packet Pg. 1536 17.A.3 1.5. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The project site is located within the South Florida Water Management District. The natural drainage of the site is in a south and southeasterly direction, to the S.R. 29 canal along the project's southern border. The canal, in turn, discharges into the Fakahatchee Strand Preserve. The application includes a water management report and plan. Water management for the proposed project is planned to utilize existing wetland features with added capacity in lakes. Elevations within the project site range from 21 to 29 feet above mean sea level. Most of the site, however, has an elevation within 25 to 27 feet. The entire site is in Flood Zone A according to Firm Map Panel Number 150 (12021CO150G) dated November 17, 2005. The soil types on the site include Chobee, Winder, and Gator soils, depressional (approximately 28 percent), and Wabasso fine sand (approximately 72 percent). Soil characteristics were derived from the USDA/NRCS Soil Survey for Collier County, Florida. 1.6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is a residential neighborhood of 400 single-family attached or detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex, or multifamily dwelling units designed with attention to natural site features. The project includes residential areas, streets, water management features, preserve areas and a recreation area. The site shall be designed, permitted and developed in phases through estimated buildout in 2009. 1.7. SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development Ordinance." I-2 Packet Pg. 1537 17.A.3 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project relationships. 2.2. GENERAL Regulations for development of the Kaicasa RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document, RPUD- Residential Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and GMP in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. 2.3. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. The project Master Plan, including layout of streets and use of land for the various tracts, is illustrated graphically by EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan. There shall be residential land use tracts, plus necessary water management Iakes, street rights -of -way, the general configuration of which is also illustrated by EXHIBIT 2. TABLE I Project Land Use TYPE UNITS ACREAGE Residential Single-family attached or 400 DU 48.05 ACRES detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex, or multifamily dwelling units Lakes 9.02 ACRES Preserve Preserves (minimum. 24.1 acres) including upland buffers 30.18 ACRES Roadsi fight -of -Way 12.75 ACRES 100.00 TOTAL ACRES B. Areas illustrated as lakes on EXHIBIT 2 shall be constructed as Iakes, or upon approval, parts thereof may be constructed as shallow, intermittent wet and dry depressions for water retention purposes. Such lakes and intermittent wet and dry areas shall be in the same general configuration and contain the same general acreage as shown by EXHIBIT 2. Minor modification to all tracts, lakes or other boundary may be permitted at the time of plat or site development plan approval, subject to the provisions of the LDC or as otherwise permitted by this RPUD Document- C. In addition to tracts shown on EXHIBIT 2, such easements as necessary (utility, private, or semi-public) shall be established within or along the various tracts as may be necessary. II-1 Packet Pg. 1538 17.A.3 2.4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USE A maximum of 400 residential dwelling units shall be constructed in the total project area. The gross project area is 100+ acres. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre. 2.5. RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan, constitutes the required RPUD development plan. Subsequent to or concurrent with RPUD approval, a site development plan and/or subdivision plat shall be submitted for the project. II-2 Packet Pg. 1539 17.A.3 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN 3.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for areas designated as residential tracts on EXHIBIT 2. 3.2. MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum of 400 dwelling units shall be allowed within the Kaicasa RPUD. 3.3. USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: (1) Single-family detached dwelling units (A building which contains only one dwelling unit and is intended, designed, used and occupied by no more than one family); (2) Zero lot line dwelling units (A single-family attached or detached dwelling structure on individually platted lots which provides a side yard on one side of the dwelling and no yard on the other); (3) Two-family dwelling units (A single, freestanding conventional building intended, designed, used and occupied as two dwelling units attached by a common wall or roof, but wherein each unit is located on a separate lot under separate ownership); (4) Duplex dwelling units (A single, freestanding, conventional building on a single lot, which contains only two dwelling units and is intended, designed, used and occupied as two dwelling units under single ownership, or where each dwelling unit is separately owned or leased but the lot is held under common ownership); (5) Single-family attached dwelling units; (6) Multi -family dwelling units. B. Accessory Uses: (1) Customary accessory uses and structures, including private garages. (2) Common recreation amenities and play areas. 3.4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (See Table II) A. GENERAL: All setbacks shall be in relation to the lot boundaries, except as otherwise provided (See Table ll, Schedule of Development Standards). B. BUILDING HEIGHT: Building height shall be measured from the finished first floor elevation to the highest point of the roof surface of a flat or Bermuda roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof and to the mean height level between eaves and ridge of gable, hip, and gambrel roofs. C. GARAGE REQUIREMENT: A minimum of a single car garage is required for each dwelling unit. III -I Packet Pg. 1540 17.A.3 TABLE 2 Development Standards for Residential Areas Single- Zero Two- Duplex -- unit is Single -Family Multi -family Family Lot Family fee simple, lot Attached Detached Line fee is common simple ownership lot PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES n mum Lot Area 3,000 s.f. 3,000 3,000 s.f. 7,000 s.f. 1,700 s.f. 9,000 s.f s. f. Minimum Lot Width' 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 70 feet 17 feet 90 feet Minimum Floor Area 900 s.f. 900 s.f. 900 s.f. 900 s.f. 900 s.f. 750 s.f. Front Yard Setback 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side Yard Setback' 5 feet 0 feet or 0 feet or 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet Rear Yard Setback 4 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Preserve Setbacks 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories Minimum Distance 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Between Principal Structures ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front Yard Setback S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. Side Yard Setback S.P& S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. Rear Yard Setback 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet (Accessory) Preserve Setback6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories Minimum Distance 0 feet or 10 0 feet or 0 feet or 0 feet or 10 feet 0 feet or 10 feet 0 feet or 10 Between Principal and feet 10 feet 10 feet feet Accessory Structures' ' On cul de sac lots and lots on the inside part of a curved street, minimum lot width may be reduced by 25%. 2 A minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk to the garage must be provided, or 23 feet from edge of pavement where no sidewalk is provided, except that side loaded garages may be 20 feet from property line if the applicant demonstrates that 2 vehicles can be adequately parked on a driveway without overhanging onto the sidewalk. ' For fee simple lots created as single family attached, zero lot line, or two family housing units, no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure, and the required side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall of the principal structure. A minimum 10 foot separation between principal structures shall be maintained. 4 For lots adjacent to a lake, 0 feet from the lake maintenance easement. No structures are permitted in the required 20 foot lake maintenance easement. 5 Preserve setback for principal structures also applies to under roof attached structures part of the primary structure. ' Preserve setback requirements of 10 feet for accessory structures also apply to any site alteration, although fill may approved to be placed within 10 feet of the upland preserve but may not be approved to be placed within 10 feet of a wetland preserve, unless it can be demonstrated that it will not negatively impact that wetland. 7 Attached accessory lanais or roofed screened areas qualify for 0-foot separation. Detached accessory structures require a minimum of a 10-foot separation. III-2 Packet Pg. 1541 17.A.3 Development Standards Notes: S.P.S.: Same as Principal Structure Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the deg-]: ament standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. III-3 Packet Pg. 1542 17.A.3 SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA 4.1. PURPOSE The purpose is to preserve and protect native vegetation and naturally functioning habitat such as wetlands in a natural or enhanced state. The Master Plan shows up to 30.18 acres of preserved native vegetation, a minimum of which 30.0 acres will be delineated as preserve tracts in final design and platting. This satisfies the LDC minimum requirement of 25%, or 24.11 acres, to be dedicated as preserve area in the Kaicasa RPUD. 4.2. USES PERMITTED No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following, subject to regional state and federal permits, when required: A. Principal Uses: (1) Open spaces/nature preserves; (2) Water management structures; (3) Boardwalks subject to appropriate approvals by permitting agencies, however such structures shall not reduce the retained native vegetation below the minimum required. IV-1 Packet Pg. 1543 17.A.3 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments related to development of the Kaicasa RPUD. 5.2. GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with final subdivision plats and all applicable state and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD. The developer, its successor or assigns shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, its successor or assigns shall follow the Master Plan and the regulations of the RPUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor or assigns in title shall be subject to any commitments within this Document. 5.3. RPUD MASTER PLAN A. EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan application. Amendments may be made subject to the provisions of the LDC. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 5.4. SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION A. The structures within the Kaicasa RPUD is proposed to be constructed beginning in mid 2007 with completion in 2004. The Kaicasa RPUD shall be subject to the PUD Sunset Provisions of the LDC. B. All of the dwelling units constructed within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be committed to occupancy by income restricted households at or below 60% of the median annual household income in Collier County at the time of construction. Covenants and restrictions shall be applied to all of the dwelling units within the Kaicasa RPUD to ensure affordability of all dwelling units for a period of at least fifteen (15) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). C. By the time building permits for 100 residential units are issued, the developer shall have constructed at least one playground area in the location shown on the RPUD Master Plan. V-1 Packet Pg. 1544 17.A.3 5.5. TRANSPORTATION A. The minimum right-of-way width for local streets within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be 50 feet, and street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a 20-foot radius (face of curb) for all internal streets and a 35-foot radius for intersections at the project entrance. Tangents shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets. B. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier County LDC. C. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at the development main access point. Access lighting shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first permanent certificate of occupancy (CO). D. Access points, including both driveways and proposed streets, shown on the RPUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on the Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property frontage. All such access issues shall be approved or denied during the review of required subsequent site plan or final plat submissions. All such access points shall be consistent with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Res. No. 01-247), as it may be amended from time to time, and with the Collier County Long Range Transportation Plan. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment is to be processed. E. In accordance with GMP, Future Land Use Element, Policy 7.3, location of a proposed interconnection point with the adjacent Farmworkers Village property is shown on the Master Plan, F. Site -related improvements (as opposed to system -related improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first CO. G. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No_ 01-247), as it may be amended, and the LDC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. H. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right-in/right-out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its successor in title, or assignee. 1. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer, and Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. J. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of any existing County right-of-way or easement, compensating right-of-way shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. 5.G. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A. The Kaicasa RPUD conceptual surface water management system is described in the Water Management Report, which has been included in the RPUD rezone application materials. Water management V--2 Packet Pg. 1545 17.A.3 infrastructure will be owned, operated and maintained by the developer until conveyed to the property owner association. B. A 100 foot wide drainage and maintenance easement, along the southern property line to encompass the existing canal and provide maintenance access along the northern bank, shall be conveyed to Collier County prior to issuance of the first CO. 5.7. UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by the developer. Potable water and sanitary sewer facilities constructed within the platted rights -of -way or within dedicated utility easements shall be conveyed to the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. B. Upon completion of the utility facilities, they shall be tested to ensure they meet the Immokalee Water and Sewer District construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. C. All customers connecting to the potable water and sanitary sewer system shall be customers of Immokalee Water and Sewer District. 5.8. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Kaicasa RPUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) regarding potential impacts to protected species on -site. A habitat management plan for protected species, including bear and panther, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to final construction plan approval. B. Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of the GMP shall be set aside as preserve areas. All preserve areas shall be identified as separate tracts and be protected by a permanent conservation easement to prohibit further development. All preserve areas shall be designated as preserve tracts on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation easements shall be dedicated on the plat to the Kaicasa homeowners' association, or like entity, for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. V-3 Packet Pg. 1546 17.A.3 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06,01.0 (also Construction Standards Manual as revised in Supp. 17, 03-55) which requires minimurn local street right-of-way width of 60 feet. Section 5.5.A. of the RPUD Document states, "The minimum right-of-way width for local streets within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be 50 feet." This deviation is justified because of the small-scale setting of the neighborhood. This addresses concerns that a larger road right-of-way is conducive to higher speeds, and physical design of the broader road right-of-way becomes less articulated and does not relate to the neighborhood scale. A 50-foot right-of-way for a residential street can successfully facilitate movement of the vehicular, pedestrian and bike traffic while accommodating all utility and drainage needs. The 50-foot right-of-way accomplishes traffic calming to provide a safer transportation system within the community. This dimension for a neighborhood right-of-way accommodates all the standard roadway functions so that the development is compact, and open spaces can be concentrated in areas of the property for enhanced environmental quality. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02, which requires construction of 5-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of local streets. One 5-foot wide sidewalk is proposed on one side of the street within those portions of Kaicasa RPUD where there are no lots, where lots exist on only one side of the street. In all other areas, sidewalks would be placed on both sides of the street. This facilitates pedestrian mobility while limiting the extent of impacts created by sidewalks on both sides of the streets. The proposed sidewalks serve the purpose of connecting residents within the neighborhood to on -site destinations as well as off -site to Farmworker's Village. This deviation will not adversely impact pedestrian mobility for the project, and will reduce wetland impacts and reduce impervious areas for better water quality and storm attenuation. Deviation #3 seeks relief from the Construction Standards Manual as revised in Supp. 17, 03-55, which requires tangents for all streets between reverse curves, unless otherwise approved by the community development and environmental services division administrator. Section 5.5.A of the RPUD Document states, "Tangents shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets." This deviation is justified because it is consistent with the Code provision for administrative discretion. The streets within the Kaicasa RPUD are not at a traffic capacity or speed level to require tangents between reverse curves. The site is designed with straight section curves and no super -elevated curves. With a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, the design promotes traffic calming. VAT-1 Packet Pg. 1547 i .T 1 Immokalee _.. Airport 219 ,. C;�NQYiNI'XCIA uj I A1� h itv 3,.ei B° g: 0 1,2w 2:5m 5.0m Katmw w �� Ex"m Luca" MA m heaffATY off a*. a ] 1GNFERIN6F"GW FOR t-fOWN 43"333I oR r rasa Iqu m w Noon ? "x (a39►sMAM 1 fllai 7 m tlitH7.M krM e.-I Q EXHIBIT I Packet Pg. 1548 17.A.3 COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTD 10' TYPE "A" A -MHO BUFFER R — RICH RESIDENTIAL 10' TYPE "A'� 2SAAC R I }� I I 10 TYPE "A" BUFFER I I I BUFFER �I _ 7 .— L-- J. — — — / f / R I HIGH LAKE d RESIDENTIAL I 1.48. AC _ I - 'PRESERVE ' \ \ TO \ LOT 0 125' 25p' 500' R\ \ SCALE: 1 — 500' I \ \ �1 f R 1 a*- i 4 10' TYPE '0" I R I t BUFFER RriF&RVE - I 4 COLLIER COUNTYHOUSINGAUTHORRY FARMWORKER'S VILLAGE l R9FJ L A — R TYPEn B. BgFF E FFER to p A -MHO N 20' TYPE t BUFFER O 1 \ \ LAKEZ} } 1 \ \ ♦ xz1-Ar' I I R N \\\ \\ I I \ \ \\ \ \ R \\ I I "D + \ \ \ \ `R \ \ \\ f \ \ > /TOT LOT C � \ SILVER STRAND III - PARTNERSHIP A -MHO PRESERVE COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTD A -MHO LAND USE KEY RESIDENTIAL (R) -Sirgta Family, Attached or Detached -Two Famiky - Zero tot Line -Duplex -Multflamlly -Common Area -Open Space, Water Maneeernent Areas -701 Lot Recreation Area LEGEND PRESERVE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT AREA RPUD BOUNDARY RuGHT.OF-WAY pU0 ADJACENT ZOMNG CLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENI LAND USE CIASSIFICAT{ON PROJECT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL USE AREA 48,05ACi LAKE 9.02 ACt PRESERVE* 3018 ACt ROADSIROW 12.75 ACx TOTAL NET ACREAGE 100.110 ACt IMPERVIOUSARPA 23.50AC3 MINIMUM OPEN SPACE(60%) 60.00 AC:* 400 UNITSFIOD AC. = 4 UNITS PER ACRE RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: I.Open space shall include active end passive mcroalion areas such as playgrounds, gulf cou-4 beach fmntago, waterways legoum, good plains, nature trails and other sumil}ar open spas.., including areas set aside far proserv.tioa ofnaliw vsVladoil & landscaped areas. 2. The RPUD master pleas eh.ell be c9oWered coeoepkW in nature. 3. The total number ordwclling units is limited to a mpxlmwn of 4DO units 4. The design and permitting of all improvements within the, dghRatLway of Sr.m Rood 29 .hail be in accmdancn with the Florid. Department of'Transpodallon Mqultemcnts. 5. Within the Knscau RPUD, a 60a: minimum! open IPWc shall beaohteved overibe Whole devCloprttVPL A minimum 25% napve vegan tion shall be renamed onsite to i.clado watlund preserves and upland prcat:rves in aecordirwo Wilk collier Courtly Lead Doveloptn"I Code. CDC LAND INVESTMENTS. INC. A -MHO iA MINIMUM OF 30.0 ACRES WILL BE DELINEATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVE 100' CANAL TRACTS IN THE FINAL DESIGN AND PLATTING. EASEMENT A MINIMUM OF 24.11 ACRES IS REQUIRED PER THE LDC NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENT ON SITE. LOW RESIDENTIAL \ NAPL S.COURT NAPLES, FLORIDAFLOR}34112 PHONE (239) 434-0333 FA E N G I N EERING E.Bx0842 }dt434-9320 LEL 0642 KAICASA RPUD MASTER PLAN ATE PROJECT NO, I FILE NO. SCALE SHEET OCT 2006 20055195 12-47-29 1" + 500' 1 EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 2 Packet Pg. 1549 17.A.3 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2007-34 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 27th day of March, 2007, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 3rd day of April, 2007. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and''Clerk Ex-officio to .ofj. County Commigsi ers P4' y: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Packet Pg. 1550 17.A.4 Kaicasa RPUD PUD Amendment PDI-PL20220003938 Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Date: Monday, November 21, 2022 Time: 5:30 pm Location: Lipmans's Conference Room , 306 E. Main St. Immokalee, FL 34142 Attendees: Amanda Martin and Kaitlyn Zindle (Johnson Engineering, Inc.) Lisa Lefkow, Mara Foley and Wilna Cariany (Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc.) Nancy Gundlach (Collier County Growth Management) See attached sign -in sheets for public attendees. Meeting Summary: The meeting started at approximately 5:30 p.m. One additional attendee was present and inquired about homeownership qualifications (sign -in sheet attached). Amanda Martin introduced herself and the applicant representatives, Reverend Lisa Lefkow, Mara Foley and Wilna Cariany of Habitatfor Humanity of Collier County, Inc. She also noted that Nancy Gundlach, the Collier County Planning reviewer was in attendance and the meeting was being recorded. She explained the requirement for a Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) is to discuss the two proposed changes for the previously approved Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). She gave background on the location of the Kaicasa RPUD and the 2007 RPUD approval noting that no bonus density was received although affordability commitments were made in the PUD document. There is no request to change the previously approved Master Plan, density or uses. Since the initial approval in 2007, not only has Habitat for Humanity adjusted their policies, but the economy and goals for the Immokalee community has changed overall. Ms. Martin explained that the first request is to revise the income levels served from at or below 60% of median household income to serve up to and including 120% area median income (AMI). This change will bring the PUD commitment up to date with current policy of Habitat for Humanity, which is to provide home -ownership opportunities that are affordable for a mix of income levels. This request aligns with the recently adopted Immokalee Area Master Plan Housing Goal 4.2.3 which aims to "Provide a mix of housing types and price points to allow for safe, high -quality dwelling unit options in Immokalee." The second request is to increase affordability commitment from a period of at least fifteen (15) to thirty (30) years from the date of CO (certificate of occupancy). By extending the timeframe it will ensure the long-term affordability for homeowners. A participant asked how the proposed changes impact his application process. The applicant's representative inquired about the participants income level and estimated that his income level falls within the 60% AMI level, which meets the proposed income level affordability commitments. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:40. Page 1 Packet Pg. 1551 17.A.6 Income Calcuation Collier County (Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island MSA) Median 98600 Income Li 1 2 3 30 19,850 22,650 25,500 50 33,050 37,750 42,450 80 52,850 60,400 67,950 120 79,320 90,600 101,880 140 92,540 105,700 118,860 90 59,409 67,896 76,383 100 66,010 75,440 84,870 110 72,611 82,984 93,357 Packet Pg. 1552 17.A.6 mit by Number of Persons in Household 4 5 6 7 8 28,300 32,470 37,190 41,910 46,630 47,150 50,950 54,700 58,500 62,250 75,450 81,500 87,550 93,600 99,600 113,160 12 2, 280 131,280 140,400 149,400 132,020 142,660 153,160 163,800 174,300 84,870 91,660 98,449 105,239 112,028 94,300 101,844 109,388 116,932 124,476 103,730 112,028 120,327 128,625 136,924 Rent Limii 0 1 496 531 826 885 1,321 1,415 1,983 2,124 2,313 2,478 1,487 1,593 1,652 1,770 1,817 1,947 Packet Pg. 1553 17.A.6 : by Number of Bedrooms in Unit 2 3 4 5 637 759 929 1,106 1,061 1,226 1,367 1,509 1,698 1,961 2,188 2,415 2,547 2,943 3,282 3,622 2,971 3,433 3,829 4,226 1,910 2,207 2,461 2,716 2,122 2,452 2,734 3,018 2,334 2,697 3,007 3,320 Packet Pg. 1554 17.A.7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE' Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners JBCC) at 9-00 A.M. on February 14, 2023, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07-34, AS AMENDED„THE KAICASA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO CHANGE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME LEVELS FROM AT OR BELOW 60% OF AREA MEDIAN INCOME TO UP TO AND INCLUDING 120% OF AREA MEDIAN INCOME; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 100t ACRES, IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROAD 29, JUST EAST OF VILLAGE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 29 AND COUNTY ROAD 846 IN SECTIONS 12 AND 13, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL202200039381 r i . 1 17Y M; CR 848 E 41 Project LocatiQti l-'A j t �) A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/ calendar -of -events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICK LOCASTRO, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Merline Forgue, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) NC-OCI1010592-01 `Z 7 rw in M Z 14 n Q eo C) M 0 0 0 N N O N J d 0 a as O N N 00 N 04 eo N 1* N 0 R C O R R O C d E t v R .r .r Q Packet Pg. 1555 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑■ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. Name of Property Owner(s): APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Name of Applicant if different than owner: c/o Lisa Lefkow Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail E City: Naples State: FL Telephone: 239-775-0036 Cell: E-Mail Address: Ilefkow@habitatcollier.org Name of Agent: Amanda Martin, AICP Firm: Johnson Engineering, Inc. Address: 2350 Stanford Court Telephone: (239) 461-2487 city: Naples Cell: (239) 200-7383 E-Mail Address: amartin@johnsoneng.com Fax: ZIP: 34113 State: FL ZIP: 34112 Fax: Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 t,EZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: RPUD Zoning district(s) to the RPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property. Residential construction underway Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential Original PUD Name: Kaicasa RPUD Ordinance No.: 2007-34, 2008-15 (scrivener's error) and 2010-35 (scrivener's error) PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 11LL 47s 29E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: See attachment Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00137521009 and 00137241004 Size of Property: 11300.0 ft. x 3,346.4 ft. = 4,350,337 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 2306 SR 29 PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑ Commercial ❑■ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: +/-100 ❑ Industrial March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N A -MHO High Residential (Immokalee) - Vacant Ag S A -MHO Low Residential (Immokalee) - Vacant Ag E A -MHO High Residential (Immokalee) - Vacant Ag W RSF-4/RMF-6 High Residential (Immokalee) - Farmworker's Village If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: 92and13 47 29E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00137521009 and 00137241004 Metes & Bounds Description: See attachment ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Immokalee CRA Mailing Address: 750 South Fifth Street City: Immokalee State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Zip: 34142 Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Name of Applicant(s): Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Utilities not applicable to this request City: State: ZIP: Cell: Address of Subject Property (If available): City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Fax: TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily: If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N/A Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. N/A Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Kaicasa RPUD (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate 'oh"oon&sM "a,h"legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit velopment and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with /afl terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Ow r Owner Lisa Lefkow IT Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fore oing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical presence or❑online notarization this day of 7 }' 202_1 by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Lisa Leikow Lccb erson(slNotary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me ❑Has produced a current drivers licens "�a:> NORMALALIBERTE - []Has produced s identification. MY COMMISSION # GG 212836 , EXPIRES: August 29, 2022 .`�`... Notary Signature: .P` Bonded Thru Notafy Public Underwriters — -- March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑■ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 ❑ Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 ❑ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 1 0 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 0 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ 0 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ 0 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ 0 Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ 0 Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %2" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ 0 ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 0 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ 0 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ❑ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ElConservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ I City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: 4SSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ❑ Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 --,I/ Ciffier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. 2 2- Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date Amanda Martin Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 8 Community Development and Environmental Services Division KAICASA RPUD M RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE KAICASA RPUD, A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 PREPARED BY: JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FL 34112 DATE REVIEWD BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-34 AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL 2008-15 and 2010-35 (Scrivener's errors) Exhibit "A" mike-tkrettglris text deleted Underline is text added SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments related to development of the Kaicasa RPUD. 5.2. GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with final subdivision plats and all applicable state and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD. The developer, its successor or assigns shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, its successor or assigns shall follow the Master Plan and the regulations of the RPUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor or assigns in title shall be subject to any commitments within this Document. 5.3. RPUD MASTER PLAN A. EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan application. Amendments may be made subject to the provisions of the LDC. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 5.4. SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENTIMONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION BA. All of the dwelling units constructed within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be committed to occupancy by income restricted households ° earning up to and including 120% of the median am+ual household ineeme Area Median Income (AMII in Collier County at the time of construction. Covenants and restrictions shall be applied to all of the dwelling units within the Kaicasa RPUD to ensure affordability of all dwelling units for a period of at least fifteen thirty (N04-5) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). As hart of the annual PUD monitoring report the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of this affordability commitment. E$. By the time building permits for 100 residential units are issued, the developer shall have constructed at least one playground area in the location shown on the RPUD Master Plan. v-1 B. A 100 foot wide drainage and maintenance easement, along the southern property line to encompass the existing canal and provide maintenance access along the northern bank, shall be conveyed to Collier County prior to issuance of the first CO. C. Base flood elevation approval shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and submitted to the County prior to the approval of any subsequent final development order. such as site development plans/construction plans. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) 5.7. UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by the developer. Potable water and sanitary sewer facilities constructed within the platted rights -of -way or within dedicated utility easements shall be conveyed to the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. B. Upon completion of the utility facilities, they shall be tested to ensure they meet the Immokalee Water and Sewer District construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. C. All customers connecting to the potable water and sanitary sewer system shall be customers of Immokalee Water and Sewer District. 5.8. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Kaicasa RPUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) regarding potential impacts to protected species on -site. A habitat management plan for protected species, including bear and panther, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to final construction plan approval. B. Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of the GMP shall be set aside as preserve areas. All preserve areas shall be identified as separate tracts and be protected by a permanent conservation easement to prohibit further development. All preserve areas shall be designated as preserve tracts on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation easements shall be dedicated on the plat to the Kaicasa homeowners' association, or like entity, for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. C. The applicant shall incorporate the "Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake" (Service 2002) into any County development orders authorizing any land clearing or construction activities. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) D. Compensation for impacts to wood stork and Florida panther habitats must be addressed as part of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Review Permit (ERP) process and the United States Army Corns of Engineers (USACE) permitting process jn consultation with the Florida Wildlife Service prior to site development plans/construction plans approval. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08 15) E. The applicant must include an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project during review of the first site development plan or first set of construction plans. This will be accomplished by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its predevelopment condition. This analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by federal and state water quality agencies. County review and approval of this analysis shall be required prior to construction plans/site development plan approval. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) F. The applicant shall be required to submit a full five-day wildlife survey_ at the time construction plans/site development plan are submitted. The survey must be less than one year old at the time of submittal. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) G. All preserve areas shall be evaluated at the time construction plans/site development plans are reviewed to ensure that such areas are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. V-3 I COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTU tO' TYPE "A- A-hsHO BUFFER 2SA'AF 10' TYPE "A" - I I R 4 f� BUFFER I I I L-- — — .— _ l / f / R HIGH I - LAKE d RESIDENTIAL I _ 1.48. AC 1 'PRESERVE ' 1 ` TO LOT ti � \ R \ \ I R\ \ R I I \ \ �1 1 R 10' TYPE 'D" ( - R 1 l BUFFER I '> P.AESERVE COLLIER COUNTY I - HOUSING AUTHORfTY FARMWORKER'S VILLAGE T \ OT 1 TYPE "B" I I I \ \ a FFER f ( 1 1 it LID i 1 \ ♦ - LAKE2'..:. ( I \ R \\ ( I - zD• TYPE "D \ R ♦ \ \ 1 o BUFFER \ \ c \ \ \ ! w \ SILVER STRAND 111 �O v PARTNERSHIP PRESERVE I Cb 100' CANAL n a EASEMENT m In LOW AESIDENTIAL ` O ry 7 HItlH ftEBIOENTiAL 10 TYPE 'A" BUFFER RI 0 125' 2�50' Ir5000' SCALE; — 500' COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS,LTO A -MHO LAND USE KEY RESIDENTIAL (R) -SV91a Family, Attached or Detached -Tam Family - Zero Lot Line -Duplex -Mullilamily -Common Area -Open Space -Water Management Areas -Tot Lot Recreation Area LEGEND PRESERVE ARFA WATER MANAGEMENT AREA RPUD BOUNDARY W RiGhj'.oF WAY PUD ADJACENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION PROJECTI.AND USE RESIDENTIAL USE AREA 48,95ACt LAKE 9.02 ACt PRESERVE' 30.18 ACt ROADSIROW 12.75 ACt TOTAL NET ACREAGE 100.00 ACt IMPERVIOUS AREA 23.50 ACt MINIMUM OPEN SPACE(60%6 B0.00 ACt 400 UNITS/100 AC, = 4 UNITS PER ACRE RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: I, Open apace rhall include aciive and passive recreation areas arch as playgttitio h, golf —r-sm, beach fmmego, waterways Iggoum, flood Plains, nahae trails Lmlotber 91iiiWar open ap—, including area set aside for pi —lion of nalivo vsgclatlon londscopcd arms. 2. T1rc RPUD mutLr plop shall be considered coacepttWl in nature. 3, the total number of dwelling units is limih:d to a MMIMum of 400 units 4. The dEsign and permining ofgll impmvements w€thin rho righRaFWay of Slam Road 29 shall be io accordonca with the Florida Depenmerit ofTramporialiun raqutremmts. 5. Within iha l[,dwa RPUD, a 61)Y. minimum open spgee alWll lx achtavnd over the whole development A minimum 25Y, native vegetation shall be rcuafxd a mite io include watland Wwn as and upland presmves ie atcordgpca with CoIg W Caunty Lard Developmem Code CDC LAND INVESTMENTS. INC. A -MHO •A MWIMUM OF 311.0 ACRES N4LL BE DEUNEATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVE TRACTS IN THE FINAL DESIGN AND PLATTING, A MINIMUM OF 24.11 ACRES IS REQUIRED PER THE LDC NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENT ON SITE, 2350 STANFORD COURT KAICASA RPUD NAPL,ES, FLORIDA 34112 MASTER PLAN PHONE FAX (23 39) 434 9320 ENGINEERIN G E-B. #842 L.B. 0642 DATE PROJECT NO, FILE ND. SCAiE SitE OCT 2006 2{7055i95 12-47-29 1" - 500' 1 EXHIBIT 2 (Approved Master Plan on 07/25/22 per PMC-PL20220004449) EXHIBIT 2 COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTD a-MHG 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER LAND USE KEY — —R— — — HIGH ftESIDENTUL RESIDENTIAL(R) r — h -Single Family, ARechad er LAKES R I I Detached 234 AG IO' TYPE ' I 10 TYPE 'A" -Two Fatuity BUFFER - _ I I I� BUFFER I� -Zero l.ot Line -Duplex — — — — Mu Nlamlly ( R -Common Area -Open Spaea HIGH LAKE4 -Water Manag MAroaa RESIDENTIA! 1,48 AC -Tat Lot AI- ion Area I PRESERVE I To LEGEND 1LOT \ P ERVEAPEA 0 125' 250' 50500' AtER MANACEMENTARE SCALE,`--- SOD, R_la.1.ARV \ \ R ` ` I I`R I `1 1 R 1 // II 10' TYPE 'D" I I BUFFER I I I PRESERVE I COLUER COONTY HOUSING AUTHORRY FARMWORKER'S VILLAGE I R "B... i TYPE FFER l n UO 1 \ ♦ - LAKIE2 I c \ \ I f R \ l \ I 20' TYPE "D t BUFFER :,,i.R TOT \ \ / LOT SILVER STRAND 111R0:.. \• \ / PARTNERSHIP PRESERVE Y- a.MHO 'pTr�. I h 100' CANAL EASEMENT rn / LOW gE$IDENTIAL 0 MIQ +t'j\Mj 2350 S, FLORIDAI-RCOURT D CO NAPEESA URT PHONE (239) 434-0313 NGINEERING FAXII 4ILS. 060 E.B. /'642 I. LB. �1642 — RIGnY-OP-wwY PUD PDJACENT ZONAVGClASS61GiroN LUC ADJAC—IL-PIJ ECUlaWFI.At PROJECT LAND USE COLLIER LAND RESIDENTIAL USE AREA 48,p5AGE HOLDINGS. LTD LAKE 9.02 ACE A -MHO PRESERVE' 70.18AC! ROADSIROW 12.75 ACx TOTAL NET ACREAGE f00.OD ACS IMPERVIDUSAREA 23.BOACd MINIMUM OPEN SPACE(60M( 6000 AC3 400 UNITS1100 AC. = 4 UNITS PER ACRE RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: L Oprn spaca dull include mlive end passive mcrmtion ereW aueN ei Plxygmunda, gulf eeunex, beach fmmegp, wakrweyf lagaum, OwJ P6im, neNm trails end mMr 91M19u open aPuc+, inpludmg attaa s<I nido Car prerervatbn of mlivp vegchd44 Iandacaped auras. 2.7Lu RPUD msamr plop dullbe casnidvW conmpaml in nasmc. 3. The -Nl number ofdwallmg anib ie Ismdwl N a maximum of400 units \C_,d and pcao+ctutugetation —IbeseLueC_,I Coda COC LAND INVESTMENTS. INC. A -MHO EXHIBIT 2 aA MINIMUM OF 30_D CRES WILL BE DELINEATED FOR THE kRPOSE OF PRESERVE TRACTS IN THE FINAL D GN AND PLATTING. A MINIMUM OF 24.11 AC IS REOUIREO PER THE LDC NATIVE VEGETA ETENTIDN REOUIREMENT ON SITE. KAICASA RPUD MASTER PLAN 17E PROJECT N0. RLE NO. SCAUC SLEET OCT 2006 20055i95 12-47-29 i" SOD' EXHIBIT EXHIBIT 2 Kaicasa RPUD List of Ownership and Corporation Parties ATTACHMENT 1 Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. See attached SunBiz report for registered agent/officer details. Percentage of Ownership 100% of Folio #s 00137521009 00137241004 Kaicasa - List of Ownership and Corporation Partiesffe-TIRWhI;� August 2022 Page 1 of 1 E NE N G�N G 9/1/22, 2:56 PM Detail by Entity Name DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS mi offlriul awe of Florida websile Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Not For Profit Corporation HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. Filing Information Document Number 742136 FEI/EIN Number 59-1834379 Date Filed 03/20/1978 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 11/05/1999 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 11145 TAMIAMI TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Mailing Address 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Registered Agent Name & Address Cunningham, John 1070 S Collier Blvd #401 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Name Changed: 02/03/2017 Address Changed: 02/25/2022 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title Chair Person Flynn -Fox, Kathleen https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=HABITATF... 1 /3 9/1 /22, 2:56 PM Detail by Entity Name 4851 Bonita Bay Blvd #603 Bonita Springs„ FL 34134 Title CEO LEFKOW, LISA REV. 1490 NOTTINGHAM DR NAPLES, FL 34109 Title Vice President & CFO KACOS, DEAN 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2022 02/25/2022 2022 07/22/2022 2022 08/17/2022 Document Images 08/17/2022 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/22/2022 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/25/2022 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/26/2021 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/27/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/01/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/29/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08/29/2017 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/01/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2015 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/25/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/25/2011 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/2010 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/26/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/25/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/09/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/20/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/02/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=HABITATF... 2/3 9/1/22, 2:56 PM Detail by Entity Name 02/06/2001 --ANNUAL REPORT 03/06/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT 11/05/1999 -- Amendment 03/11/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT 02/04/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT 11/26/1997 -- Name Change 01/31/1997 --ANNUAL REPORT 01/24/1996 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=l nitial&search N ameOrder=HAB ITATF... 3/3 DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 12 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 4" BY 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 02'13'13" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12, A DISTANCE OF 2670.91 FEET TO A 4" BY 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 02'13'27" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1 / 4 OF SAID SECTION 12, A DISTANCE OF 179.09 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 87'46'47" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1235.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'13'13" EAST ALONG A LINE 1235.30 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 A DISTANCE OF 4193.59 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MAINTAINED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD NO. 29; THENCE NORTH 45'03'20" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 730.92 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44'55'22" WEST TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 1088.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02'19'02" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 7.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE GRANTOR, IF ANY, IN AND TO THE OIL, GAS AND MINERALS OF EVERY KIND OR CHARACTER LOCATED IN, ON OR UNDER, OR THAT MAY BE PRODUCED FROM SAID PROPERTY. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Co er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the Q C. ercentage UT sucn imeresl: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the CI L. I ILdb'C UI ]LUL.R UVVI ICU Uy CGL.I 1. Name and Address % of Ownership Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 100% (Not -for -profit corporation) If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ►ercentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Colr County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired 12/1 0/04 Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Kaicasa RPUD (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development (R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate '°"ns°nEngi—rl°9Inc. (A—ndsM-fin) , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and ad commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with a terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Ow r Owner Lisa Lefkow CEO of Habitat 4. manity of Collier County, Inc. Printed Name / Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fore oing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical presence or[]online notarization this day of >) 20L7, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Lisa Lefkow 520e I rson(q Notary Public must check appiicable box: Are personally known to me F7Has produced a current drivers license--, ; '�*"Y? ' PJORMALALICFRTE o. R� ®Has produced s identification. _,; MYCOMMiSSiON#GG212836 o _ EXPIRES: August 29, 2022 Notary Signature: f,; ; Bonded Thru Rotary nublic Unde(writers v � — ---- March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Kaicasa RPUD (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development (R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate '°"nsonEngi—rl°9Inc. (A—ndsM-fin) , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and ad commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with a terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Ow r Owner Lisa Lefkow CEO of Habit t f r Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fore oing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical presence or[]online notarization this day of >) 20L7, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Lisa Lefkow 520e I rson(q Notary Public must check appiicable box: Are personally known to me F7Has produced a current drivers license--, ; '�*"Y? ' PJORMALALICFRTE o. R� ®Has produced s identification. _,; MYCOMMiSSiON#GG212836 o _ EXPIRES: August 29, 2022 Notary Signature: «,; ; Bonded Thru Hokary Public Unde(wrilers v � — ---- March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20220003938 1 Lisa Le&ow (print name), as Chief Executive officer (title, If applicable) ofHabitat for HumanilyofCollier County, Inc. (company,lfa plicable),swear oraffirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 Q applicantcontract purchaserand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Johnson Engineering, Inc. (Amanda Martin) to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes.- • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa c stated in it are true. -1��S gn ture Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means ofysicalrpresence or ❑ online not ation this .20- day of „V , 202Z, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) U�u ( moos^' Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: I Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identification. Notary Signature CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 ,2o.g.?pg,• NORMA Lr1LIBERTE MY COMMISSION C,G 272035 P� EXPIRES: August 29,2022 Bonded ihn: Notarf'ub!ic Underwriters Coo ler County Public Services Department Community & Human Services Division CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED REVIEW Name of Development: Kaicasa RPUD Applicant/Agent: Johnson Engineering. Inc. (Amanda Martin, AICP) Email: amartin@johnsoneng.com Size of Property: �)-100 acres Proposed Use: Res,derdial Total Number of Residential Units Planned: 400 Number of Affordable Housing Units Planned: 400 # Rental # Owner Current % of Affordable Units: 100% Address/Location: 2306 sR 29 Phone: 239-200-7383 Area Median Income (AMI) Target 120%-140% GAP Income 80%- 120% Moderate Income 50%- 80% Low Income 30%-50% Very -Low Income 0%- 30% Extremely -Low Income % Other Threshold to qualify: 20% All 400 units will be owner occupied and committed to occupancy by income restricted households earning up to and including 120% AMI. Permit Number, If available: Ord. 42007-24, 2018-15 (scrivener's error) and 2010-25 (scriveners enor) PL20220003938 Proposed Land Use Restriction: Q PUD Restriction or AHDB Agreement ( Developer Agreement © Impact Fee Deferral Agreement © Grant Restriction Other: I hereby certify that the above -described project meets the definition of providing affordable housing in Collier County and as such is entitled to participate in the County's "Expedited Review Procedures of Affordable Housing" as described in Resolution No. 2018-40. By: By: & Human Services Division Owner/ This Certification must be submitted to the Growttt.M'a plan revisions, within nine months of date of issuance. Date: Date: 2 Lzo2y- Department with your permit application package, or Community & Human Services Division - 3339 Tamiami Trai East, Suite 211 • Naples, Flonda 341125361 239-252-CARE (2273) • 239-252-CAFE (2233) • 239-252-4230 (RSVP) • xwwcolliergov.nehhumanservices co'LLier c014nty Growth Management Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the address listed below. This form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to the pre -application meeting. Please allow 3 business days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below. Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type). ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use Permit) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIN (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑✓ OTHER PUD Amendment (PUDA) LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) 13 47 29 THAT PORTION OF REFERENCED PARCEL 8 IN SECTION 13 DESC IN OR 2153 PG 1901 and 12 47 29 THAT PORTION C FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00137521009and 00137241004 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 2306 SR 29 • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-of-way • SURVEY (copy — only needed for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Kaicasa PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL # PL20220003938 Addressing Checklist (Rev 12/2021) PUD-2005- Page 1 of 2 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov co'LLier county Growth Management Department Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application, indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: DEmail ❑Personally picked up Applicant Name: Amanda Martin / Johnson Engineering, Inc. Phone: (239) 200-7383 Email: amartin(@iohnsonene.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00137521009 and 00137241004 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Updated by: Date: Date: 6/2/2022 IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR A NEW FORM SUBMITTED. Addressing Checklist (Rev 12/2021) Page 2 of 2 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov STATE OF FLORIDA CMOsrr • Allufa rirr .+'^^"a. Sao Off 3 Gulf Mei-ii O J go m Lo c NOTES: 03 These Drawings are for Permitting Purposes only and are NOT intended for construction use. COLLIER COUNTY m DRIVING DIRECTIONS: N.T.S. L Project location is on the Northeast side of o SR 29 f2 mi. South of the Immokalee i Airport. Kaieasa Property IL Luau„ Collier County, Florida ENGINEERING • Oar. mmoms ORJOO awo� 4)I - ALLV Muff 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34116 PHONE (239) 334-0333 FAX (239) 334-9320 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 Immokalee STREET MAP N.T.S. Form Workers Village `rp cog PROJECT LOCATION VICINffY AERIAL N.T.S. SEC 12,13 — TSP 47S — RGE 29E LATITUDE 26'24'03", LONGITUDE 81'22'59" LOCATION MAP ATE RO,ECT NO. FILE NO. SCALE SWEET 06/24/05 1 20055195 12-47-29 N.T.S. F gure 1 Kaicasa RPUD PUD Amendment Narrative of Request Request Habitat for Humanity of Collier County is requesting an amendment to the Kaicasa RPUD Ordinance 07-34 as amended. The purpose of the request is to revise the income levels served as described in PUD Section 5.4.B from at or below 60% of median household income to serve up to and including 120% area median income (AMI). Additionally, the covenants and restrictions to ensure affordability of all dwelling units is being increased from a period of at least fifteen (15) to thirty (30) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). The Kaicasa PUD was originally approved by Ordinance 2007-34. Two amendments were both for correcting scriveners errors (Ordinance 2008-15 and Ordinance 2010-35). A minor change to the Master Plan was also approved through PMC-PL20220004449. These approved changes are codified in the PUD document as part of this amendment. The proposed request will bring the PUD commitment up to date with current policy of Habitat for Humanity, which is to provide housing that is affordable for a mix of income levels. The mission of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County remains to serve households who have limited or no options for home ownership, and the adjustment from a maximum threshold of 60% AMI to 120% AMI will broaden the range of those who can be served by the Kaicasa development. This development will be the largest ever developed by Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, and the ability to expand those served while maintaining a commitment to affordability will fulfill the needs and objectives of the Immokalee community. This amendment aligns with the recently adopted Immokalee Area Master Plan, which includes Housing Goal 4.2.3 establishing a goal to "Provide a mix of housing types and price points to allow for safe, high -quality dwelling unit options in Immokalee." This amendment will allow up to 400 housing units at a mix of price points to increase the housing inventory in Immokalee serving households with income at many levels below and including up to 120% AMI. By extending the timeframe for the commitment from 15 years to 30 years, this will avail even more community members of the opportunity for homeownership. The PUD is approved for a maximum of 400 units, equating to 4 dwelling units per acre. The approved density is a maximum of 4 du/ac, well below the density allowed by the Immokalee Future Land Use designation of High Residential, which is maximum density of 8 du/ac. The PUD includes a commitment that all units will be sold to households earning at or below 60% of the area median income (AMI), however this project was not subject to an affordable housing density bonus agreement and not subject to requirements of Section 2.06.00 governing density bonuses for affordable housing. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1 identifies the criteria for determining if a PUD change is substantial, insubstantial or minor. Each criteria is listed below, and a response is included to demonstrate this request meets criteria for an insubstantial change, however the nature of the request to alter an affordability commitment renders it a PUD Amendment. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Request Narrative August2022 Page 1of3 ENENGINEENE RING a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No change is proposed to the PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No change is proposed to the number of dwelling units, land use or height of buildings in the previously approved PUD. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No change is proposed to preservation, conservation recreation or open space areas in the previously approved PUD. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No change is proposed to the location or size of areas used for nonresidential uses in the previously approved PUD. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; The proposed request is limited to revising the income levels served and will not increase impacts of the development related to traffic generation, circulation or other public facilities. f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; The proposed request is limited to revising the income levels served and will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; The proposed request is limited to revising the income levels served, which has no effect on stormwater retention or discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; The proposed request is limited to revising the income levels served, which will not impact abutting land uses. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Request Narrative j =Rhr z August2022 Page 2of3 ENGNGINEEEERING i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; The proposed request is limited to revising the income levels served, and does not modify the previously approved density or land uses. The previously adopted Ordinance 2007-34 (amended by Ordinance 2008-15 and 2010-35 for scrivener's errors) adheres to the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. The approved density is a maximum of 4 du/ac, well below the density allowed by the Immokalee Future Land Use designation of High Residential, which is maximum density of 8 du/ac. The provision of affordable housing in this development is consistent with Goal 1 of the Housing Element of the GMP and Goal 4.2.3 of the IAMP by creating an affordable mix of housing for residents of Collier County. The proposed road and sidewalk system for the project provides for movement of pedestrians, motorized, and non -motorized vehicles consistent with Objective 3.3 of the TAMP. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. The Kaicasa PUD is consistent with the existing adjoining Farmworker's Village residential project to the west. The Immokalee Future Land Use Map designates property to the north, east and west as High Residential and property to the south as Low Residential. The project development shall comply with stormwater quality and quantity standards described in the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. The site is designed to include preserved native vegetation, consistent with Goal IV of the IAMP. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or The PUD is not a development of regional impact (DRI). k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. The proposed request meets criteria for an insubstantial change, however the nature of the request to alter an affordability commitment renders it a PUD Amendment. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Request Narrative j =Rhr z August2022 Page 3of3 ENGNGINEEEERING Kaicasa RPUD PUD Amendment PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.13) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The proposed changes relate to revising the income levels served and codifying the conditions identified in scrivener's error Ordinance 2008-15 (stormwater and environmental condition language). This does not impact the type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. An Affidavit of Unified Control is included with this application. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) The proposed changes relate to revising the income levels served and codifying the conditions identified in scrivener's error Ordinance 2008-15 (stormwater and environmental condition language). This does not impact the type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34. The proposed development will be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Specifically, the provision of affordable housing in this development is consistent with Goal 1 of the Housing Element of the GMP and Goal 4.2.3 of the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan by creating an affordable mix of housing for residents of Collier County. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Rezone Considerations j�.T i August2022 Page 1of2 ENGINEERING d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. This change will not impact the internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements as currently approved. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. No change is proposed to open space, which has been deemed adequate as approved by Ord. 2007- 34 and PPL CDPAR12767 (pending PL20220000198). f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Facilities are available for development of the site, which is being designed, permitted and developed in three phases. Approval of the PPL (PPL CDPAR12767 (pending PL20220000198) was issued on September 13, 2021. Phase I, consisting of 123 units, is under construction and is anticipated to be completed by early 2023. 9. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Surrounding land areas are available for potential expansion, however expansion is not proposed at this time. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served and meet the public purpose of providing a range of housing ownership opportunities at affordable levels to serve the community. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Rezone Considerations j =Ihr z August2022 Page 2of2 ENGINEERING Kaicasa RPUD PUD Amendment Rezone Criteria (LDC Section 10.02.08.F) 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed changes relate to revising the income levels served and codifying the conditions identified in scrivener's error Ordinance 2008-15 (stormwater and environmental condition language). This does not impact the type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34. The proposed development will be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The subject property is within the Immokalee Urban Area and is designated High Residential District on the Immokalee Area Master Plan (TAMP) Future Land Use Map which allows a high density residential development. A density of four (4) dwelling units per gross acre is adopted in Ordinance 2007-34 and is consistent with the parameters described in the IAMP for the High Residential District. The provision of affordable housing in this development is consistent with Goal 1 of the Housing Element of the GMP and Goal 4.2.3 of the IAMP by creating an affordable mix of housing for residents of Collier County. The proposed road and sidewalk system for the project provides for movement of pedestrians, motorized, and non -motorized vehicles consistent with Objective 3.3 of the TAMP. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. The Kaicasa PUD is consistent with the existing adjoining Farmworker's Village residential project to the west. The Immokalee Future Land Use Map designates property to the north, east and west as High Residential and property to the south as Low Residential. The project development shall comply with stormwater quality and quantity standards described in the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. The site is designed to include preserved native vegetation, consistent with Goal IV of the TAMP. 2. The existing land uses pattern. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. This does not impact the type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The Kaicasa RPUD was previously adopted in Ordinance 2007-34 and the proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. The proposed changes do not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Rezone Considerations August2022 Page 1of3 ENENGINEENE RING 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions in the neighborhood. The Kaicasa RPUD was previously adopted in Ordinance 2007-34. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served and no boundary changes are proposed. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The recently updated and adopted Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Housing Goal 4.2.3 asks to "Provide a mix of housing types and price points to allow for safe, high -quality dwelling unit options in Immokalee." The proposed amendment supports this goal by providing housing for a broader range of income levels. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. This does not impact the type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34 and no changes are proposed that would impact traffic activity or public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. This does not impact the type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34 and no changes are proposed that would impact drainage. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served and no changes are proposed to reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served and no changes are proposed that would adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. 14. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served and will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Rezone Considerations j MIII Z August2022 Page 2of3 ENGINEERING 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The adopted PUD did not utilize any bonus density provisions. The income level restrictions were voluntarily included in the PUD to support the mission of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. The proposed change to broaden the income levels served is supported by the updated Immokalee Redevelopment Plan and does not grant special privileges to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons whythe property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served and no changes are proposed to the existing zoning designation. 44. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. This does not impact the scale, type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The residential use and PUD District was previously adopted in 2007-34. The proposed changes relate to broadening the income levels served. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The PUD District was previously adopted in 2007-34 and the proposed changes relate to revising the income levels served and codifying the conditions identified in scrivener's error Ordinance 2008-15 (stormwater and environmental condition language). 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, Art. II, as amended.] The proposed changes relate to revising the income levels served and codifying the conditions identified in scrivener's error Ordinance 2008-15 (stormwater and environmental condition language). This does not impact the type and pattern of development as previously adopted in 2007-34. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC. Kaicasa RPUD Amendment Rezone Considerations August2022 Page 3of3 ENGINEERING Amanda Martin From: LaRowJacob <Jacob.LaRow@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 10:38 AM To: Amanda Martin; GundlachNancy Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Amanda - Yes. Please accept the following comments below. Affordable Housing: Staff has no objections to the request to modify and increase the income targeting from 60% to 120% of AML The income targeting under the original PUD was provided voluntarily by Habitat and was not in exchange for additional density or other public good. Sincerely, Jacob La Row Director — Economic Development and Housing Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FI 34104 239-252-1202 Please note new number Jacob.LaRow@colliercountyfl.gov Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. From: Amanda Martin <ab@johnsoneng.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 10:17 AM To: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jake, Have all of your comments/questions been adequately addressed? Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. i 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com 0 AICP CERTIFIED From: Gundlach Nancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 9:11 AM To: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Cc: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Hi Amanda, I am remembering to copy you on the email below. Respectfully, Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov From: GundlachNancy Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 9:10 AM To: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Hi Jacob, ►a The Kaicasa PUD did not receive a density bonus in exchange for the provision of Affordable Housing. It appears the provision of Affordable Housing is voluntary. (This is a Habitat for Humanity project.) I copied the page below from the original 2007 Ordinance for reference: STATEMENT OFCOMPL1ANCE The subject property consists of 1{10+ acres of property irr Collier County, Florida, and will be developed as a Residential Planted Unit Devr1opment (RPUD) to be known as the Kaicasa RPUD. The property is located within the Immokalee Kuming Commnity_ The proposed development will consist ofap to 400 residential dwelling units in the farm of single-family ahached or detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex, or mutrifarruly hourft. The proposed development will be in tornpltan,ce with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the Collier County Crrow[h Manmgcrncnt Plan (GMP) fur the followiq reasons: 1. The subject property is within the lmrrrokalee Urban Area, as depicted on the countywide Future Land Use Map, and is designated Bigh Residential District on the ]ramkalee Arta Mastcr Plan (]AMP) Future Land Use Map. According to the IAMP, the purpose of the High Residential District is to provide for a district of high deruity residential development, Residential dwellings shall be limited to muhi-fanti.ly stmctvrrs and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided [hey are compatible with the district. A densily less than or equal to sigh[ (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. The proposed residential development is consistent with the paramelers described in the ]AMP for the High RcsideatW District, and satisfies Objective II.I of the LAMP_ 2. The proposed road and sidewalk system for the project provides for movement of pedestrians, motorized, and nvn-motorised vshitles consistent with Objective V1.1 of [hc IAMP- In accordance with GMP Futurc Land Use Elenunt Policy 7.3, location of a proposed interconnection point with the adjacent Farmworkers Village property h shown (FLUE) on the master plan. 3 The project developrnem is comTatible and r owlerrtrntary to existing and fixture surrounding land uses as MgUired in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. The proposed residential project will be consistent with the only existing adjoining develorprnmt which is the Farrnworl er's Village residential project to the. west. The Immkalte Futurc sand khw Map designates property to the north, cast and west as I figh Residential and property to the south as Law Residential_ The proposed development will be wnsi.stv-nt with all these designations for future use of surroutxling propertied, 4. Me project developmnt shall complywith stwmwater quality and quantity standards describcd in the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element, The site is designed to inclrtde prescT-vcd native vegetation, consisent with Croal IV of the ]AMP. 5_ The projected density of 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) is iri compliant• with the LAMP based on the following relationships to required criteria-. Density per IIigh Residential designation on lltmxokaiee Future land Use Map 8 DUTA Affordable Musing density bonus 8 DUrA (100% are for low income hau,seholds) Pernvtted density 16 DUTA PROPOSED DENSITY 4 DU/A 400 units on 100-r acres (gross acreage for residential. use) 6. The provision of affordable housing in this development is consistent with € foal I of the Housing Elerneni of the k.iW and Goal III of the LAMP by treat* affordable housing for residents of Collier County, including Law and moderate income persons, rural residents, and f irmworkcrs, The pr posed project increases the nurnbef of affordable housing units to meet tiw housing nerds of the County which is consistent wilb Objective l of the Housi tit Element_ 7. All final local tleveloplr m orders for this project are subject to tht Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance in aceardaftce with Policy II.1.2 of the IAMF_ Respectfully, Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@colIiercountyfI gov From: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@col liercountvfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 4:02 PM To: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Good Afternoon Nancy - I had a conversation with Amanda this afternoon regarding this project. I had question for you to which the answer would likely influence my comments. To your knowledge, will the request by the applicant to raise the ceiling of income targeting from 60% of AMI to 120% of AMI for assisted households in the PUD represent a reneging of any regulatory, zoning or other land use relief that had been provided to the Developer in exchange for providing housing at that original range of housing affordability? Or, to put it context of relief seen more frequently today — Was there a grant of additional density (or other special exceptions) not otherwise available to the applicant but for the provision of delivering owner -occupied housing at the low income thresholds? Thank you! Sincerely, Jacob LaRow Director — Economic Development and Housing Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FI 34104 239-252-1202 Please note new number Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfLgov C;O*er 014-Kty Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. From: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 2:36 PM To: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Cc: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Are you available now? Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com xt�Je of C"e,[r +� 3 I AICP CEWFIFIED From: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 10:12 AM To: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Cc: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Amanda - I'll have time this afternoon. Sincerely, Jacob LaRow Director —Economic Development and Housing Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FI 34104 239-252-1202 Please note new number Jacob.LaRow@colIiercountyfl.gov Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. From: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 10:08 AM To: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Cc: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jacob, Can we set up a time to review this project and answer any questions you may have? I'm available most of the day tomorrow. Thank you. Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com AICR CERTIFIED From: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2022 11:16 AM To: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Amanda, Please see attached. Sincerely, Jacob La Row Director — Economic Development and Housing Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FI 34104 239-252-2399 N Jacob. La Row@ col Iiercountyfl.gov O*P,r 014-xiy Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. To improve our services and technical assistance to our clients, vendors or subrecipients, we ask that you provide us feedback on our services to your organization by completing the short survey contained at the following links: Affordable Housi Internal Partners From: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 10:33 To: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jacob, Hope you had a nice long weekend. Are you able to sign and return the attached form today? Thank you! Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com 7 C - AICP CERTIFIED From: Amanda Martin Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2022 1:39 PM To: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form 8 Jacob, Attached is the signed form, ready for your signature. Thank you! Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com pf rt Ff{r AICP CERTIFIED From: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2022 9:29 AM To: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Amanda - Thank you for your time this morning to share details and the intent to modify the PUD bringing the income targeting inline with the limits indicated on the review form. I'm great with the form as is, please have the appropriate party sign and return to me and I'll get this out ASAP. Sincerely, Jacob LaRow Director —Economic Development and Housing Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FI 34104 239-252-2399 Jacob. LaRow@colIiercountyfLgov Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. To improve our services and technical assistance to our clients, vendors or subrecipients, we ask that you provide us feedback on our services to your organization by completing the short survey contained at the following links: Affordable Housing Internal Partners From: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 15:32 To: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form EXTERNAL ENTAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jacob, For flexibility, the applicant is requesting for all 400 units to be owner occupied and committed to occupancy by income restricted households earning up to and including 120% AMI. I have that as a note on the draft form attached. If that is acceptable to you, I will have the applicant/owner sign the form. Attached are the approved ordinances per your request. Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com 7 C AICR CERTIFIED From: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 9:14 AM To: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Cc: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Amanda- io I've revised the Expedited Review Form, slightly. I've entered in most of the information on your original submittal on the form attached. Can you confirm, sign and return? I didn't enter the owner/renter information as it was left blank, please complete. Also, can you provide the referenced Ordinances, permits, etc? Thanks! Sincerely, Jacob La Row Director — Economic Development and Housing Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FI 34104 239-252-2399 Jacob.LaRow@colIiercountyfl.gov C,-O*e,-r C�0"-Kty Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. To improve our services and technical assistance to our clients, vendors or subrecipients, we ask that you provide us feedback on our services to your organization by completing the short survey contained at the following links: Affordable Housi Internal Partners From: Amanda Martin <ab@Iohnsoneng.com> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 11:42 To: LaRowJacob <Jacob.LaRow@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: FW: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jacob, Please find attached the expedited review form for P1-20220003938. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County is requesting an amendment to the voluntary affordable housing commitments in the Kaicasa RPUD Ordinance 07-34 (as amended). The purpose of the request is to revise the income levels served as described in PUD Section 5.4.13 from at or below 60% of median household income to serve up to and including 120% area median income (AMI). A PUD Amendment package will be submitted upon your review and approval of the attached Expedited Review Form. Please reach out to me if you have any questions. Thank you. 11 Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com 4 k ; ,%,.)I wI IL Ffr AICP CERTIFIED From: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 7:47 AM To: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Hi Amanda, Please submit a completed Expedited Review Form that has been signed by Jacob LaRow. Respectfully, //a rey Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov From: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 3:19 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.goy>; GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. 12 Thank you Tom. Do I email the completed form to Mr. La Row for approval prior to application submittal? Thank you. Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com 0 ArcP CERTIFIED From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 3:43 PM To: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com>; GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form Hi Amanda, See attached requested Expedited Review form. It is located in our Housing Department. Here is a link to other info you may need: https://www.colliercountvfl.gov/our-county/advanced-components/search?q=expedited Let me know if you need anything else. Operations Analyst - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning mot ier fovlftt Exceeding Expectations Everyday 13 From: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 3:26 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Kaicasa - Expedited Review Form EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thomas and Nancy, The Kaicasa PUDA application package is coming together. I was unable to locate the "Certificate of Affordable Housing Expedited Review" form online. Can you email the form to me? Thank you. Amanda Martin, AICP Senior Planner Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: (239) 461.2487 Cell: (239) 200.7383 amartin@iohnsoneng.com `'A c `f MICE CERTIFIED Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 14 SINCE 1946 0 ENGINEERING August 15, 2022 Collier County Government Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: No Impact Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Request Kaicasa (PUDA) PL #20220003938 To Whom It May Concern: The Kaicasa RPUD Ordinance is being amended to correct the household income level requirement to be consistent with the Habitat for Humanity policies. This amendment does not change the density or intensity and therefore, no additional traffic impacts are anticipated. The applicant requests a TIS waiver for the referenced PUDA application. LMH: j lc: 20225042-001 Sincerely, JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Leah M. Holmes, P.E. P.E. No. 85359 2350 Stanford Court ■ Naples, FL 34112 (239) 434-0333 0 www.JohnsonEn ing eerieg com dr— . Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PD I Date and Time: Wednesday 6/29/22 at 3 : 00 Assigned Planner: Nancy Gundlach Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Kaicasa (PDI) PL#: 20220003938 137241004 & 137521009 Property ID #: Current Zoning: PUD - Kaicasa Project Address: City: Immokalee State: FL Zip: 34142 Applicant: Amanda Martin - Johnson Engineering,Inc. Agent Name: Amanda Martin Phone: 239-334-0046 2122 Johnson St. Fort Myers FL Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Property Owner: Habitat 33901 Zip: for Humanity of Collier County Inc. Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: LIT vi. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page I 1 of 5 Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliercountvfl.qov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 a'1,�-' i ,A) (r — �'A-wL �! -�C.c av � 1., � c: �. � �i � 1 •i .� /,�,�P lci�f F©,+� /� (��l��T ) + 4A 6,�� 6'�l b ,1 � rn �,yk �.,,T a k: U Al/ .4,7 _ �' ,�l'G'�iC �.+. T ,yLr c-� ";` Jhr¢ .e 7�i � �.�vG�-e To `�.� e i ►� C/�,2 � OG �c,%� F11.1 L4 JL L) ti kk fLc:- 'A L.. — (10L111 Lb �� - ✓UU Ew vI (Lo ,v nw ¢ T L �),4- k+A. PQ Q, i A-0 � If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton�naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland(cDnaplesgov.com Robin Singer RSingertcDnaplesgov.com Erica Martin emartin _naplesgoy.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN K 1` Cis q eL Z o 1 Z90c�' 3 9 From: GundlachNancy G ,vr KJ 6 A/ 0 i' S Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 10:38 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? From: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 11:41 AM To: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Yes, Nancy. We will need to process this as a PUDA, the adjustment of the AMI is a policy decision that requires Board approval. mike From: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach colliercountvfl gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 11:37 AM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountvfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountvfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau colliercountvfl gov> Subject: RE: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Hi all, Just following up, have we determined whether Kaicasa can be processed as a PDI? Respectfully, /r&r- 60 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov From: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 9:51 AM To: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows @colliercountvfl.gov>; GundlachNancy <Nancv.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountvfl gov> Subject: RE: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Anytime before 11:30 am or after lunch. ;�-62 4, 1 5.0. SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENTlMfZ ITORINC REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION A. T7te structures within the Katcasa RPUD is proposed to be constructed beginning to mid 2007 with comph;tion to 1W9. The Kaicass RPUD shall be subject to the PUD Sunset Provisions of the LDC, a, All of the dwelling units constructed within the Kawasa RPUD shall be conntutied to occupancy by income restricted households at or below 6094 of the mcdtan annual household income in Collier County at the time of consttuchon. Covenants and restrictions shall he applied to all of the dwelling units within the Katcasa RPUD to ensure affordability of all dwelling units for a period of at least fifteen { 15) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO)- c By the time budding permits for 100 residential arils are issued, the devclopor shall have constructed at least one playground area in the location shown on the RPUD Master Plan Do you know when they got their first C.O? The PUD became effective April 4th, 2007; just over 15 years ago. t t WL Asktov--CLcIzo MAv1.90%1&0 Ass%StGtvlt Couvlt� Attorm O f f%ee of the Covw tl AttorKt. 2200 North rforseskoe Drive, SkLte 301 Napl,es, J=L 34104 (239) 252-9773 From: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 9:24 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov>; GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.eov>; CrotteauKathynell<Kathynell.Crotteau@coiliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Heidi, I've attached the PUD for the Kaicasa PUD, which is entitled at 4 units per acre, but also has Developer commitment that all the units are at or below 60% of AMI. This is a very odd arrangement as they do not have a density bonus and are eligible for 8 units an acre at market rate, but the PUD still has the commitment for income restriction (Its owned by Habitat). They want to go through the PDI process to adjust the income restriction to 120% of AMI. The question is can the HEX decided this request or should we require a full PUD-A? Can we get together and discuss? Thanks, mike From: BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 2:55 PM To: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Hi Nancy, I checked the Administrative Code and the PDI criteria contained in the LDC and I could not find any provision that would require the proposed change to be processed as a PUDA. I have copied Mike to see if he concurs. Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coilier CoH-n.ty Exceeding expectations, every day! TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT'. From: GundlachNancy <Nancv.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 10:20 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Hi Ray, QiwP. ;3 0 We had a PDI preapplication meeting for Kaicasa PUD. The petitioner proposes to change the AMI for income - restricted housing from 60% to 120%. (Please see attachment). The PUD is not using any Affordable Housing Density to achieve its density and was originally approved in 2007. The petition falls within the parameters for being processed as a PDI. However, a concern was expressed that anybody who has income -restricted housing approved by the BCC could then turn around and then file a PDI to remove it. Can we still process Kaicasa PUD as a PDI? Please confirm. Respectfully, /l/ lw 60 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancv.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.eov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. ThomasClarkeVEN �e4_1 C4- ,a r (It -211Z-2-OCV3'j/ 36 From: GundlachNancy Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 10:39 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? From: GundlachNancy Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 12:19 PM To:'Amanda Martin' <ab@johnsoneng.com> Subject: FW: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Hi Amanda, We have confirmed that due to the AMI provision, the proposed changes to the Kaicasa PUD must be processed as a PUD Amendment (PUDA). It will be heard by the CCPC/BCC instead of the HEX. Respectfully, /V Cly Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov From: BosiMichael <Michael.Boni@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 11:41 AM To: GundlachNancy <Nancv.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows @colIiercountyfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Yes, Nancy. We will need to process this as a PUDA, the adjustment of the AMI is a policy decision that requires Board approval. mike From: GundlachNancy <Nancv.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 11:37 AM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountvfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@ coIliercountyfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Change to Affordable Housing Commitment - Is it still a PDI? Hi all, �46-a J. A - ` - Just following up, have we determined whether Kaicasa can be processed as a PDI? Respectfully, /Vaacy Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach(@colliercountvfl.gov ds request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. µfe`✓ PU v aD Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. N69 ';�. 4 'ET L ThomasClarkeVEN �a > C fin- -- Pt- Z U z 2-6603(l3e From: GundlachNancy Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 10:39 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: Kaicasa PUDA - Enviro Doc's Needed? From: BrownCraig <Craig.Brown @col liercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2022 3:48 PM To: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Amanda Martin <ab@johnsoneng.com> Subject: RE: Kaicasa PUDA - Enviro Doc's Needed? Hi Nancy, The change will not require any environmental data. Thanks HI Amanda!! Craig Brown Principal Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2022 3:06 PM To: BrownCraig <Craig.Brown @colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Amanda Martin <ab@iohnsoneng.com> Subject: Kaicasa PUDA - Enviro Doc's Needed? HI Craig, The Kaicasa PUD is being amended to only change an Affordable Housing commitment. Are any of the following Environmental Documents listed below required to be submitted? Pt --e- 0�. 0- &, Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.0( Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmi Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordina project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Inclu( copies of previous survevs. Please confirm. Respectfully, 1&ey Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountvfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. ?A(,,, a, 0, °7 2 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Gj,l— sry. t i �GcG 111U C>� -,-- _ 1�17a9-Ch 2 n o v %j2�,+.s�Un=�",�-7i©,� -- ��L� �w�.e•-cam `�,.a �'�h. iJ€TzS - ��-�e 3 3 �U b !� i (ky L 1 6 I� ! uJ �Cr' f- t6/ rl I. Z ?.°" ,Y {� 5 •' �' v'�1 r� I L i�� (a << ti T4-G6 (3 �.� (ZO L+ �9 S z L` U,�r�tc T 4L 2, - Z 3 V - em A L J ftCv3LA (loU4,r, c, v ii �' WL di- -- C jt ti � s7`I -2 a. 43.r'C Pr ,� cp�� ►� 1 C �IJGC,-1 C' C. CoC: w"h/ F 1. Ci-o C� �,;�7`/TG-1 &" I h Ct,c. S Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer. • Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliereov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. Comp Planning: Pre-App Meeting for PL20220003938 — Kaicasa (PDI). The subject site is parcel # 00137241004 and 00137521009 and are designated Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, High Residential Subdistrict on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map of the Immokalee Area Master Plan of the GMP. This subject site is zoned Kaicasa Planned Unit Development Zoning District. According to the Property Appraiser's website, the two parcels equal 100 acres and are owned by Habitat for Humanity. This RPUD was previously approved for a maximum of 400 DUs on the 100 Acres (4DUs/A). No change is proposed for the density or intensity and therefore remains consistent with the GMP. The applicant is requesting to amend the most recently amended Kaicasa RPUD Ordinance, by correcting Scrivener's errors and adjusting household income levels to be consistent with Habitat for Humanity policies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning 6-29-2022 Disclaimer., Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Meeting Notes rp(6,e 3. A Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 1 ofi 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 3:14 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; GundlachNancy Subject: Kaicasa Pre App Meeting Notes /pU00 Thomas, Please provide the following pre app meeting notes: For this petition request please provide a letter of no impact TIS Waiver; (separate letter on letterhead requesting the waiver based on no transportation impact changes). Please let us know of any questions -concerns. Respectfully, Michael Sawyer Project Manager Transportation Management Services Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael. sawyer(a,col liercountyfl.g_o_v Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 1:17 PM To: GundlachNancy Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20220003938 - Kaicasa (-PP<(J:wbA) Follow Up Flag: Follow up 111 Flag Status: Flagged I have nothing for this pre -application meeting. Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. Beard(a)C011ierCountvFL.aov Phone: (239)-252-5782 1;'�PROUDIY sVMIG`'114 ';M vSINCE V Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. T�v 6 _,e '�>, C Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20220003938 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov 2" Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Sue Faulkner GMP - Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Rachel Hansen GMP —Comprehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel. hansen@colliercountyfLgov Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf GMP —Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@colliercountyfLgov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 cover County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 rich ard.orth@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Eric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric. Ortman@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Michael Sawyer GMP, Comp Planning Manager Transportation Planning 252-2708 252-2926 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 1 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information! Name Representing Representing Phone's, Email •//ii 4,4,' /-4�1N i�ii �'('^ y� y V�iilrLSc:s. j rld U (fl 24, Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 Kaicasa (PDI) — PL20220003938 ----Nancy Gundlach © Participants (14) — ❑ X G, Find a participant thomas clarke (Host, me) AB © CormacGiblin Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner Cb 12392694328 Alexander Sho:,,:alter 7ru.4-i-.AAxrK — % f Christiebetancouri — ea4- Derek D. Perry, County Attorney's Office CA 0 EricOrtman f Jacob LaRow - Collier County, FL 7 %` ftFFOrLoL� l�Gus�wL J Lisa Lefkow - .d4t3i7-/�-T Fun- WL4—fA4 � saG,,vyermichael r �% Sue Faulkner Jared Brovm PL2O22O003938— Kaicasa (QDU /- Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. r: Nancv Gundlach Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Amanda Martin (239) 461-2487 • Agent to list for PL# Amanda Martin • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Habitat for Humanity of Collier County • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Request to adjust household income levels • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): No change to the approved density. • Details about Project: REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Amanda Martin Title: Planner III Email: amartin@johnsoneng.com Phone: (239) 461-2487 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-6866 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the C. iercentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage oT stocK owned ny each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net Q e f. 9. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the �I I IL.CI �, JLUUM IUIUCI J, UCI ICI lUdl ICJ, UI PC31 LI ICI �. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers. if a corporation. partnership. or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 cower county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 or I AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION I Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PVD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 1�4menclment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1Er Li Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1Li Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ ffy- Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study — �,2c vr��� �Ce7tQR vF ,Uv a.-dnPhc7 - S=� AAAC�S 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1Ef Electronic copy of all required documents 113 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ �/ l� Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ �/ U ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE 91LUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Tf, Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ELF—] Other: I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION I Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 �11"," ❑ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre D to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre L' PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre f- Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ❑ Transportation Review Fees: ® Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. ® Minor Study Review: $750.00 ® Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliersov.net ❑ Legal Advertising Fees: C C: $1,125.00 ACC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5ch and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 1$�101112y3�� 6�,�2Cz9Z 9Z ORDINANCE NO. 07- 34 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURE WITH MOBILE -HOME OVERLAY (A -MHO) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS KAICASA (RPUD) LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROAD 29, JUST EAST OF VILLAGE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND APPROXIMATELY 2 MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 29 AND COUNTY ROAD 846, IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 100:E ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. s f.., t--- r: 0, _ 7- Fri k.:o WHEREAS, Laura Spurgeon, AICP of JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC., representing HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 12, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agriculture Mobile -Home Overlay (A -MHO) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District known as Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development in accordance with the RPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. 1 SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this �J day of 0? G_ � z , 2007. ATTEST:.�y . �,�� DWIGHT- �. BROCLERK ^w . „ ,3 , D pu .`CIerk ��;� a� t4, Chairman Approyeand legal sufficiency Marjori . Student -Stirling Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: iAK4ES COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This ordinonck, fit- iwith ft Sec r tary of S ate s Office the �day ofa' , and acknowledgement of that film received this _ r day of 2 Community Development and Environmental Services Division KAICASA RPUD F.1 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE KAICASA RPUD, A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 11145 Tan-�iami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 PREPARED BY: JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FL 34112 DATE REVIEWD BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL Exhibit "A" TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES i STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP & DESCRIPTION I-1 through I-2 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT II-1 through II-2 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL AREAS III -I through I11-3 SECTION IV PRESERVE AREAS IV -I through IV-1 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS V-I through V-3 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS VI -I LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT I Location Map EXHIBIT 2 RPUD Master Plan TABLE i Project Land Use Tracts Page II-1 TABLE 2 Development Standards Page 111-2 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The subject property consists of 100+ acres of property in Collier County, Florida, and will be developed as a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to be known as the Kaicasa RPUD. The property is located within the Immokalee Planning Community. The proposed development will consist of up to 400 residential dwelling units in the form of single-family attached or detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex, or multifamily housing. The proposed development will be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the Immokalee Urban Area, as depicted on the countywide Future Land Use Map, and is designated High Residential District on the Immokalee Area Master Plan (TAMP) Future Land Use Map. According to the IAMP, the purpose of the High Residential District is to provide for a district of high density residential development. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi -family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. A density less than or equal to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. The proposed residential development is consistent with the parameters described in the IAMP for the High Residential District, and satisfies Objective II.1 of the IAMP. 2. The proposed road and sidewalk system for the project provides for movement of pedestrians, motorized, and non -motorized vehicles consistent with Objective VI.1 of the IAMP. In accordance with GMP Future Land Use Element Policy 7.3, location of a proposed interconnection point with the adjacent Fammworkers Village property is shown (FLUE) on the master plan. 3. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. The proposed residential project will be consistent with the only existing adjoining development which is the Farmworker's Village residential project to the west. The Immokalee Future Land Use Map designates property to the north, east and west as High Residential and property to the south as Low Residential. The proposed development will be consistent with all these designations for future use of surrounding properties. 4. The project development shall comply with stormwater quality and quantity standards described in the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. The site is designed to include preserved native vegetation, consistent with Goal IV of the IAMP. 5. The projected density of 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) is in compliance with the IAMP based on the following relationships to required criteria: Density per High Residential designation on Immokalee Future Land Use Map 8 DU/A Affordable housing density bonus 8 DU/A (100% are for low income households) Permitted density 16 DU/A PROPOSED DENSITY 4 DU/A 400 units on 100+ acres (gross acreage for residential use) 6. The provision of affordable housing in this development is consistent with Goal 1 of the Housing Element of the CiMP and Goal III of the TAMP by creating affordable housing for residents of Collier County, including low and moderate income persons, rural residents, and farmworkers. The proposed project increases the number of affordable housing units to meet the housing needs of the County which is consistent with Objective 1 of the Housing Element. 7. All final Iocal development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance in accordance with Policy IT1.2 of the IAMP. ii SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Kaicasa RPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property, being 100+ acres, is described as: That portion of referenced parcel 8 in Section 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, and that portion of referenced parcel 8 in Section 12, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, described in O.R. Book 2153, Page 1901, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 4" by 4" concrete monument found marking the Southwest corner of said Section 12. thence North 02°13'13" West along the West line of Southwest 1/4 of said Section 12, a distance of 2670.91 feet to a 4" x 4" concrete monument found marking the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 12; thence North 02°13'27" West along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 12 , a distance of 179.09 feet' thence departing said West line, North 87046'47" East a distance of 1235.30 feet; thence South 02°13'13" East along a line 1235.30 feet East of and parallel with the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 12 a distance of 4193.59 feet to the Northerly maintained right-of-way line of State Road No. 29; thence North 45°03'20" West along said Northerly line a distance of 730.92 feet; thence North 44°55'22" West to an intersection with the Westerly line of said Section 13, a distance of 1088.66 feet; thence North 02°19'02" West along said Westerly line, a distance of 7.56 feet to the point of beginning LESS AND EXCEPT THEREFROM all right, title and interest of the Grantor, if any, in and to the oil, gas and minerals of every kind or character located in, on or under, or that may be produced from said property. A site location map is provided as EXHIBIT 1. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the ownership of: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Section 12, Township 47 South, Range 29 East and at the northwest corner of Section 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East. The project entrance is along the north side of State Road 29, just east of Village Oaks Elementary School, and approximately 2 miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and County Road 846. B. The zoning classification of the subject property prior to the date of this approved RPUD Document was A -MHO, Rural Agricultural with Mobile Home Overlay. I-1 1.5. PHYSICAL. DESCRIPTION The project site is located within the South Florida Water Management District. The natural drainage of the site is in a south and southeasterly direction, to the S.R. 29 canal along the project's southern border. The canal, in turn, discharges into the Fakahatchee Strand Preserve. The application includes a water management report and plan. Water management for the proposed project is planned to utilize existing wetland features with added capacity in lakes. Elevations within the project site range from 21 to 29 feet above mean sea level. Most of the site, however, has an elevation within 25 to 27 feet. The entire site is in Flood Zone A according to Firm Map Panel Number 150 (12021CO150G) dated November 17, 2005. The soil types on the site include Chobee, Winder, and Gator soils, depressional (approximately 28 percent), and Wabasso fine sand (approximately 72 percent). Soil characteristics were derived from the USDA/NRCS Soil Survey for Collier County, Florida. 1.6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is a residential neighborhood of 400 single-family attached or detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex, or multifamily dwelling units designed with attention to natural site features. The project includes residential areas, streets, water management features, preserve areas and a recreation area. The site shall be designed, permitted and developed in phases through estimated buildout in 2009. 1.7. SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development Ordinance." 2-2 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project relationships. 2.2. GENERAL Regulations for development of the Kaicasa RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document, RPUD- Residential Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and GMP in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. 2.3. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. The project Master Plan, including layout of streets and use of land for the various tracts, is illustrated graphically by EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan. There shall be residential land use tracts, plus necessary water management lakes, street rights -of -way, the general configuration of which is also illustrated by EXHIBIT 2. TABLE 1 Project Land Use TYPE UNITS ACREAGE Residential Single-family attached or 400 DU 48.05 ACRES detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex, or multifamily dwelling units Lakes 9.02 ACRES Preserve Preserves (minimum 24.1 acres) including upland buffers 30.18 ACRES Roadsi fight -of -Way 12.75 ACRES 100.00 TOTAL ACRES B. Areas illustrated as lakes on EXHIBIT 2 shall be constructed as lakes, or upon approval, parts thereof may be constructed as shallow, intermittent wet and dry depressions for water retention purposes. Such lakes and intermittent wet and dry areas shall be in the same general configuration and contain the same general acreage as shown by EXHIBIT 2. Minor modification to all tracts, lakes or other boundary may be permitted at the time of plat or site development plan approval, subject to the provisions of the LDC or as otherwise permitted by this RPUD Document. C. In addition to tracts shown on EXHIBIT 2, such easements as necessary (utility, private, or semi-public) shall be established within or along the various tracts as may be necessary. 2.4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USE A maximum of 400 residential dwelling units shall be constructed in the total project area. The gross project area is 100+ acres. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre. 2.5. RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan, constitutes the required RPUD development plan. Subsequent to or concurrent with RPUD approval, a site development plan and/or subdivision plat shall be submitted for the project. II-2 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN 3.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for areas designated as residential tracts on EXHIBIT 2. 3.2. MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum of 400 dwelling units shall be allowed within the Kaicasa RPUD. 3.3. USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: (1) Single-family detached dwelling units (A building which contains only one dwelling unit and is intended, designed, used and occupied by no more than one family); (2) Zero lot line dwelling units (A single-family attached or detached dwelling structure on individually platted lots which provides a side yard on one side of the dwelling and no yard on the other); (3) Two-family dwelling units (A single, freestanding conventional building intended, designed, used and occupied as two dwelling units attached by a common wall or roof, but wherein each unit is located on a separate lot under separate ownership); (4) Duplex dwelling units (A single, freestanding, conventional building on a single lot, which contains only two dwelling units and is intended, designed, used and occupied as two dwelling units under single ownership, or where each dwelling unit is separately owned or leased but the lot is held under common ownership); (5) Single-family attached dwelling units; (6) Multi -family dwelling units. $. Accessory Uses: (1) Customary accessory uses and structures, including private garages. (2) Common recreation amenities and play areas. 3.4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (See Table II) A. GENERAL: All setbacks shall be in relation to the lot boundaries, except as otherwise provided (See Table II, Schedule of Development Standards). B. BUILDING HEIGHT: Building height shall be measured from the finished first floor elevation to the highest point of the roof surface of a flat or Bermuda roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof and to the mean height level between eaves and ridge of gable, hip, and gambrel roofs. C. GARAGE REQUIREMENT: A minimum of a single car garage is required for each dwelling unit. TABLE 2 Development Standards for Residential Areas Single- Zero Two- Duplex — unit is Single -Family Multi -family Family Lot Family fee simple, lot Attached Detached Line fee is common simple ownership lot PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES nimum Lot Area 3,000 s.f. 3,000 3,000 s.f. 7,000 s.f. 1,700 s.f. 9,000 s.f. s.f Minimum Lot Width' 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 70 feet 17 feet 90 feet Minimum Floor Area 900 s.f 900 s.f. 900 s.f. 900 s.f. 900 s.f. 750 s.f. Front Yard Setback 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side Yard Setback' 5 feet 0 feet or 0 feet or 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet Rear Yard Setback 4 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Preserve Setbacks 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories Minimum Distance 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Between Principal Structures ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front Yard Setback S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. Side Yard Setback S.P,S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. Rear Yard Setback 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet (Accessory) Preserve Setback6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories Minimum Distance 0 feet or 10 0 feet or 0 feet or 0 feet or 10 feet 0 feet or 10 feet 0 feet or 10 Between Principal and feet 10 feet 10 feet feet Accessory Structures' On cul de sac lots and lots on the inside part of a curved street, minimum lot width may be reduced by 25%. 2 A minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk to the garage must be provided, or 23 feet from edge of pavement where no sidewalk is provided, except that side loaded garages may be 20 feet from property line if the applicant demonstrates that 2 vehicles can be adequately parked on a driveway without overhanging onto the sidewalk. 3 For fee simple lots created as single family attached, zero lot line, or two family housing units, no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure, and the required side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall of the principal structure. A minimum 10 foot separation between principal structures shall be maintained. 4 For lots adjacent to a lake, 0 feet from the lake maintenance easement. No structures are permitted in the required 20 foot lake maintenance easement. 5 Preserve setback for principal structures also applies to under roof attached structures part of the primary structure. b Preserve setback requirements of 10 feet for accessory structures also apply to any site alteration, although fill may approved to be placed within 10 feet of the upland preserve but may not be approved to be placed within 10 feet of a wetland preserve, unless it can be demonstrated that it will not negatively impact that wetland. 7 Attached accessory lanais or roofed screened areas qualify for 0-foot separation. Detached accessory structures require a minimum of a 10-foot separation. 111-2 Development Standards Notes: S.P.S.: Same as Principal Structure Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the deg :,1:,ment standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA 4.1. PURPOSE The purpose is to preserve and protect native vegetation and naturally functioning habitat such as wetlands in a natural or enhanced state. The Master Plan shows up to 30.18 acres of preserved native vegetation, a minimum of which 30.0 acres will be delineated as preserve tracts in final design and platting. This satisfies the LDC minimum requirement of 25%, or 24.11 acres, to be dedicated as preserve area in the Kaicasa RPUD. 4.2. USES PERMITTED No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following, subject to regional state and federal permits, when required: A. Principal Uses: (1) Open spaces/nature preserves; (2) Water management structures; (3) Boardwalks subject to appropriate approvals by permitting agencies, however such structures shall not reduce the retained native vegetation below the minimum required. TV-1 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments related to development of the Kaicasa RPUD. 5.2. GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with final subdivision plats and all applicable state and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD. The developer, its successor or assigns shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, its successor or assigns shall follow the Master Plan and the regulations of the RPUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor or assigns in title shall be subject to any commitments within this Document. 5.3. RPUD MASTER PLAN A. EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan application. Amendments may be made subject to the provisions of the LDC. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 5.4. SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENTIMONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION A. The structures within the Kaicasa RPUD is proposed to be constructed beginning in mid 2007 with completion in 2004. The Kaicasa RPUD shall be subject to the PUD Sunset Provisions of the LDC. B. All of the dwelling units constructed within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be committed to occupancy by income restricted households at or below 60% of the median annual household income in Collier County at the time of construction. Covenants and restrictions shall be applied to all of the dwelling units within the Kaicasa RPUD to ensure affordability of all dwelling units for a period of at least fifteen (15) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). C. By the time building permits for 100 residential units are issued, the developer shall have constructed at least one playground area in the location shown on the RPUD Master Plan. V-1 5.5. TRANSPORTATION A. The minimum right-of-way width for local streets within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be 50 feet, and street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a 20-foot radius (face of curb) for all internal streets and a 35-foot radius for intersections at the project entrance. Tangents shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets. B. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier County LDC. C. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at the development main access point. Access lighting shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first permanent certificate of occupancy (CO). D. Access points, including both driveways and proposed streets, shown on the RPUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on the Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property frontage. All such access issues shall be approved or denied during the review of required subsequent site plan or final plat submissions. All such access points shall be consistent with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Res. No. 01-247), as it may be amended from time to time, and with the Collier County Long Range Transportation Plan. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment is to be processed. E. In accordance with GMP, Future Land Use Element, Policy 7.3, location of a proposed interconnection point with the adjacent Farmworkers Village property is shown on the Master Plan. F. Site -related improvements (as opposed to system -related improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first CO. G. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No_ 01-247), as it may be amended, and the LDC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. H. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right-in/right-out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its successor in title, or assignee. 1. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer, and Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of any existing County right-of-way or easement, compensating right-of-way shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. 5.6. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A. The Kaicasa RPUD conceptual surface water management system is described in the Water Management Report, which has been included in the RPUD rezone application materials. Water management V-2 infrastructure will be owned, operated and maintained by the developer until conveyed to the property owner association. B. A 100 foot wide drainage and maintenance easement, along the southern property line to encompass the existing canal and provide maintenance access along the northern bank, shall be conveyed to Collier County prior to issuance of the first CO. 5.7. UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by the developer. Potable water and sanitary sewer facilities constructed within the platted rights -of -way or within dedicated utility easements shall be conveyed to the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. B. Upon completion of the utility facilities, they shall be tested to ensure they meet the Immokalee Water and Sewer District construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. C. All customers connecting to the potable water and sanitary sewer system shall be customers of Immokalee Water and Sewer District. 5.8. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Kaicasa RPUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) regarding potential impacts to protected species on -site. A habitat management plan for protected species, including bear and panther, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to final construction plan approval. B. Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of the GMP shall be set aside as preserve areas. All preserve areas shall be identified as separate tracts and be protected by a permanent conservation easement to prohibit further development. All preserve areas shall be designated as preserve tracts on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation easements shall be dedicated on the plat to the Kaicasa homeowners' association, or like entity, for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. V-3 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6,06.01.0 (also Construction Standards Manual as revised in Supp. 17, 03-55) which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet. Section 5.5.A. of the RPUD Document states, "The minimum right-of-way width for local streets within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be 50 feet." This deviation is justified because of the small-scale setting of the neighborhood. This addresses concerns that a larger road right-of-way is conducive to higher speeds, and physical design of the broader road right-of-way becomes less articulated and does not relate to the neighborhood scale. A 50-foot right-of-way for a residential street can successfully facilitate movement of the vehicular, pedestrian and bike traffic while accommodating all utility and drainage needs. The 50-foot right-of-way accomplishes traffic calming to provide a safer transportation system within the community. This dimension for a neighborhood right-of-way accommodates all the standard roadway functions so that the development is compact, and open spaces can be concentrated in areas of the property for enhanced environmental quality. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02, which requires construction of 5-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of local streets. One 5-foot wide sidewalk is proposed on one side of the street within those portions of Kaicasa RPUD where there are no lots, where lots exist on only one side of the street. In all other areas, sidewalks would be placed on both sides of the street. This facilitates pedestrian mobility while limiting the extent of impacts created by sidewalks on both sides of the streets. The proposed sidewalks serve the purpose of connecting residents within the neighborhood to on -site destinations as well as off -site to Farmworker's Village. This deviation will not adversely impact pedestrian mobility for the project, and will reduce wetland impacts and reduce impervious areas for better water quality and storm attenuation. Deviation #3 seeks relief from the Construction Standards Manual as revised in Supp. 17, 03-55, which requires tangents for all streets between reverse curves, unless otherwise approved by the community development and environmental services division administrator. Section 5.5.A of the RPUD Document states, "Tangents shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets." This deviation is justified because it is consistent with the Code provision for administrative discretion. The streets within the Kaicasa RPUD are not at a traffic capacity or speed level to require tangents between reverse curves. The site is designed with straight section curves and no super -elevated curves. With a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, the design promotes traffic calming. VI-1 ff J `" 4 �C� � CIS .,,........,_ � ! ✓ Immokalee _.. Airport SR 29 _ CR 846 e. BELL OR OVOROCKaR U) a 1,2w z5m 5,000 Feet €OVOK a MAWTAT Nwhm Fa 34"22 FQZ HaJMFlNfTY 3 IENGINFERING onr Rarer*>•a gut Ma +a�N FtoxrWa (�yf349 1� its xr ss.a7.71 is Mw�w ION EXHIBIT 1 COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTD 10' TYPE "A" A"MHO BUFFER - — .—R— — — — HIGH RESIDENTIAL 10' TYPE 'A" 254'AC' I - I I R } } 10 TYPE 'A" BUFFER I I I BUFFER RI / -- L -- J- — — — � r � R FE4-NTIAL] ..LAKE4 I - 1.48. AC 1 'PRESERVE ' \ TO LOT 0 125' 250' 500' R\ \ - - - - SCALE: 1 500' I \ \ 7.+11•AC. . I \ \ R I r \\ r+ R ----' �\ - �� f / R 4 4 I I COLLIER LAND 10' TYPE 'D" I R I l HOLDINGS, LTD BUFFER I PRESERVE �_.. . COLLIER COUNTYHOUSING AUTHORITY FARMWORKER'S - VILLAGE ` ... . n ` X1. TYPE "B" E FFER c � _RUD) O p MHO N A- 20' TYPE o BUFFER , \\\ \\ I I \ \ R \\ } } \�R \ \ \\ 1 /TOT LOT SILVER STRAND III �O `w PARTNERSHP A-IL1H0 Ap PRESERVE , 100' CANAi EASEMENT LOW RESIDENTIAL LAND USE KEY RESIDENTLAL (R) -Single Family, Attached or Detached -Two Family - Zero Lot Line -Duple): -Multtfamily -CDmmon Area -Open Space �Waler Management Areas -Tol Lot Recreation Area LEGEND PRE5ERVEAREA WATER MANAGEMENTAREA -- RPUD DOUNDARY — RlOMY-OF-WAY PUD ADJACENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION PROJECT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL USE AREA 48,05ACt LAKE %02 ACt PRESERVE' 30.18 ACt ROADSlROW 12.75 ACx TOTAL NET ACREAGE 100,W ACt IMPERVIOUSAREA 23.50AC3 MINIMUM OPEN SPACE(80%A 8000 AC* 400 UNITSMOO AC, = 4 UNITS PER. ACRE RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: I.Open space shalt include naive and Passive recreation arras such as playgrounds, golf con"", beach fmntago, waterways Ilgoum, flood plains, nature trails uW other snmil}u open aPseea, including aecus set aside for preservation ofnolive vegriation & landscaped omas. 2. The RPUD master pion "I be reslsidcad conceptual in nature. 3. The local number of dwelling units is lirailed to a mealmum of 4OO unilL 4. The design and permining of all improvements within Ibs righFa&way of Sata Rood 29 shall be is accordancn with the Florida Department ofTransportatlon raqulremems. 5. Within the Ifaicass RPUD, a 60Ye mirtmum open spoor Ihall be ochined over the whole devcLopmrnL A minimum 25% native vegatalion shall be retained of -site to include watland preserves and upland pmWrvrn in anxordanea with C0IHw Counry Land Development Code. CDC LAND INVESTMENTS. INC- A -MHO J •A MINIMUM OF 30-0 ACRES WILL BE DELINEATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVE TRACTS fN THE FINAL DESIGN AMD PLATTING, A MINIMUM OF 24.11 ACRES IS REQUIRED PER THE LDC NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENT ON SITE. 2.350 STANFORD COURT KAICASA RPUD NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 MASTER PLAN PHONE (239) 434-0333 £ N G I N E RING E.BX/642 )dt4L.0.4j1642 DATE PROJECT MO. FILE NO. SCALE SHiET OCT 2006 2D055195 12-47-29 1' - 500' EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 2 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2007-34 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 27th day of March, 2007, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 3rd day of April, 2007. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and"Ciierk Ex-officio to, 9a ofi County Commit:�si'iers y: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk ORDINANCE NO.OS- 15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS-:', AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND' DEVELOPMENT CODE, OR ITS SUCCESSOR, BY;,:: PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-34, THE KAICASA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED `ter _T UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD} TO CORRECT ,.�,,. SCRIVENERS ERRORS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. `; m 4 ' WHEREAS, on March 27, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 07-34 establishing the Kaicasa RPUD; and WHEREAS, following said action adopting Ordinance No. 07-34, it was determined that the Kaicasa RPUD Document, as transmitted to the Department of State, omitted a provision that was otherwise intended and made part of the public hearing and therefore constitutes a scrivener's error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AMENDMENT TO SUBSECTION 5.6., ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT," OF ORDINANCE NO.07-34, THE KAICASA RPUD. Subsection 5.6., Stormwater Management, of Ordinance No. 07-34, the Kaicasa RPUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.6. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A. The Kaicasa RPUD conceptual surface water management system is described in the Water Management Report, which has been included in the RPUD rezone application materials. Water management infrastructure will be owned, operated and maintained by the developer until conveyed to the property owner association. B. A 100 foot wide drainage and maintenance easement, along the southern property line to encompass the existing canal and provide maintenance access along the north bank shall be conveyed to Collier County prior to issuance of the first CO. C. Base flood elevation approval shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA) and submitted to the County 12rior to the approval of any subsequent final development order, such as site development plans/construction nlans. Page 1 of 3 SECTION TWO: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AMENDMENT TO SUBSECTION 5.8., ENTITLED "ENVIRONMENTAL," OF ORDINANCE NO. 07-34, THE KAICASA RPUD. Subsection 5.8., Environmental, of Ordinance No. 07-34, the Kaicasa RPUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.8. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Kaicasa RPUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendation of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) regarding potential impact to protected species on site. A Habitat management plan for protected species, including bear and panther, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to final construction plan approval. B. Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of the GMP shall be set aside as preserve areas. All preserve areas shall be identified as separate tracts and be protected by a permanent conservation easement to prohibit further development. All preserve areas shall be designated as preserve tracts on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation easements shall be dedicated on the plat to the Kaicasa homeowner's association, or like entity, for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. C. The applicant shall inca orate the "Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indio Snake" Service 2002 into any County development orders authorizing any land clearing or construction activities. D. Compensation for impacts to wood stork and Florida panther habitats must be addressed as part of the South Florida Water Management District „(SFWMD) Environmental_ Review Permit (FRP) process and the United States Army Corps of Engineers USAGEPermitting process in consultation with the Florida Wildlife Service prior to site developmentplans/construction plans approval. E. The a licant must include an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project during review of the first site develo ment plan or first set of construction plans, This will be accomplished by evaluating water qualit loadings expected from the project(post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater mana ement controls compared with water quality loadings of the Droject area as it exists in its predevelopment condition. This anal sis shall be performed using methodologies approved b federal and state water quality agencies. County review and a roval of this analysis shall be required prior to constructionplans/site development plan approval. F. The a licant shall be required to submit a full five-day wildlife survev at the time constructionplans/site development plan are submitted. The survey must be less than one year old at the time of submittal. G. All preserve areas shall be evaluated at the time constructionplans/site development plans are reviewed to ensure that such areas are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Page 2 of 3 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners of'Collier County, Florida, this day of (AWA , 2008. ATT'E.,)'I": D'W1. HT%E BROOK, .CLERK By: Att"t� + to pity Clerk signatu'! oal ■ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO TY, FL IDA By: V TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN ir Mar orU M. Student -Stirling 'J Assistant County Attorney Page 3 of 3 This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office the -3L* day of � and acknowledgement of that fiiin received this I day, of By Depu erk STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2008-15 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 25th day of March 2008, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 27th day of March 2008. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Cl�rk Ex-officio tp'Board of County Commissioners_ By:Martha Verg , Deputy Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 10- 3 5 ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04- 41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, OR ITS SUCCESSOR, BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-34, AS AMENDED, THE KAICASA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on March 27, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance Number 07-34 establishing the Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD); and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance Number 08-15, which Ordinance corrected certain scrivener's errors in Ordinance Number 07-34; and WHEREAS, following said action of adopting Ordinance Number 07-34 and Ordinance Number 08-15, it was determined that the Kaicasa RPUD Document, as amended,~and as_ transmitted to the Department of State, omitted a provision that was otherwise intended and made part of the public hearing and therefore constitutes a scrivener's error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AMENDMENT TO'THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-34, AS AMENDED, THE KAICASA RPUD. The Title of Ordinance Number 07-34, as amended, the Kaicasa RPUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 07-34 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURE WITH MOBILE - HOME OVERLAY (A -MHO) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS KAICASA (RPUD) LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROAD 29, JUST EAST OF VILLAGE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND APPROXIMATELY 2 MILES EAST OF THE Words underlined are added; words strickenn are deleted INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 29 AND COUNTY ROAD 846, IN SECTIONS 12 AND 13, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 100 +/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SECTION TWO: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AMENDMENT TO SECTION ONE OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-34, AS AMENDED, THE KAICASA RPUD. Section One of Ordinance Number 07-34, as amended, the Kaicasa RPUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agriculture Mobile -Home Overlay (A -MHO) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District known as Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development in accordance with the RPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by ma.o 't vote by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of, 2010. ATTEST: D (;ffT 1;.,,BROCK, CLERK •�, y .,si y`.r1 Attsst^+►�' Ap to form and 1 ciency: S en ' AssisWCounty AticnR V.15'i° BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY. FRED W. COYLE, CHA][RMAN This ordinance filed with the Secretory of State' Office the day of . ., ?�� and ocknowledgemer'A pf that filingrec iyed this pL`t day of o.Q _ c1wc Words underlined are added; words s#r-ieken thfeuo are deleted STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2010-35 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 14th day of September, 2010, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 16th day of September, 2010. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to Board of County Commissioners gt# Uf CQU By: Teresa Pal Deputy Clzk rya ► ,, �� AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Signature of State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this K day of ,rn l , 2010 by .4,j,J4 A1,6e- T t J , who is personally known to me, ft�v�� _ •tom _ f (Signature Notary ublic) Printed Name of Notary, G:1rIIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NIM Oct2010.Doc (Notary Seal) LISA J. BAUGHMAN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA NO. GG982187 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG, 09, 2024 BARRON COLLIER P'SHIP LLLP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY # 200 NAPLES, FL 34105--- 3227 COLLIER CNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1800 FARM WORKER WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 5544 COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS LTD 999 VANDERBILT BEACH RD #507 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 MULLINS, JOY L 2475 STATE ROAD 29 S IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 9734 091.8/091.56 AIGAV Dane aiglfedwoo WW L9 x WIJJ 9Z ILwjo} ap 911anbi13 09L8/0945® AJaAV ullm 9lglfedW03 „8/9 Z x „L azls lagel BARRON COLLIER P'SHIP LLLP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY # 200 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 3227 Duplicate COLLIER CNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1800 FARM WORKER WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 5544 Duplicate HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113--- 7753 SILVER STRAND III PARTNERSHIP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 3227 CDC LAND INVESTMENTS INC 999 VANDERBILT BEACH RD #507 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1800 FARM WORKER WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 5544 Duplicate HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113--- 7753 Duplicate SILVER STRAND III PARTNERSHIP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34105--- 3227 Duplicate label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 November 4, 2022 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. has submitted petition PL20220003938 to Collier County for a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Amendment for the following described property: The Kaicasa RPUD is approximately 100 acres bordering on the east side of Farmworkers Village, on the north side of State Road 29, approximately 2 miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and County Road 846 and located in portions of Section 12 and 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East. The property owner is petitioning Collier County to amend the Kaicasa RPUD to revise the income levels served by the development as described in Ordinance 07-34 Section 5.4.6 to serve households with income up to and including 120% of the area median income (AMI). Additionally, the covenants and restrictions to ensure affordability of all dwelling units is being increased from a period of at least fifteen (15) to thirty (30) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). [PL20220003938] A Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunityto become fully aware of the petition and to give you an opportunity to ask questions and provide comments. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on: Monday, November 21, 2022 at Lipman Family Farms Conference Room 306 E. Main Street, Immokalee, FL 34142 If you have questions prior to the meeting or if you want to participate remotely, please contact Amanda Martin at (239) 461-2487 or amartin@johnsoneng.com. Sincerely, JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Amanda Martin, AICP amartin@iohnsoneng.com (239) 461-2487 City Final Publication Date Naples 11 /5/2022 State Ad Number FL GC10971492 ZIP Code Publication 34113-7753 Naples Daily News Your Name Market Marita Froimson Naples Email Address Delivery Method mfroimson@gannett.com Both Number of Affidavits Needed 1 Customer Email ab@johnsoneng.com Customer Name Habitat For Humanity Collier Development Customer Phone Number (239) 775-0036 Customer Address 11145 Tamiami TRL E Naples, FL 34113-7753 Account Number (If Known) 532217 Name Habitat For Humanity Collier Development Street 11145 Tamiami TRL E SaPlICS 43F[1113 NrWS PART OrTHE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLLIER DEV 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113-7753 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee courdies of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 11/5/2022 Subscribed and sworn to before on NOVEMBER 5TH, 2022 VZO.. Z2 otary, to of WI, ounty of Br My commissi e fires: PUBLICATION COST: $1,008.00 AD No: GC10971492 CUSTOMER NO: 532217 PO#: 10-19-22 NIM AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD W/ MAP 3X9.95 NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public StatC of Wisconsin PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting hosted by Habitat for Humanity of Collier County,lnc. on: Monday, November 21 at 5:30 p.m. at Lipman Family Farms Conference Room 306 E. Main Street, Immokalee, FL 34142 Subject Property: The Kaicasa Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) is approximately 100 acres bordering on the east side of Farmworkers Village, on the north side of State Road 29, approximately 2 miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and County Road 846 and located in portions of Sections 12 & 13, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. ,,� w: are sr•a` � �-�F,a{orl, �:�_ ..._.-__..�i�. ef"e•...r.._..._.._...__,,...._...... _...�. r fT Project Site f The .property owner is petitioning Collier County to amend the Kaicasa RPUD to revise the income levels served by the development as described in Ordinance 07-34 Section 5.4.13 to serve households with income up to and including 120% of the area median income (AMI). Additionally, the covenants and restrictions to ensure affordability of all dwelling units is being increased from a period of at least fifteen (15) to thirty (30) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). [PL20220003938] WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer. If you have questions prior to the meeting or if you want to participate remotely, please contact Amanda Martin at (239) 461-2487 or amartin@johnsoneng.com. NO-, AN70111.A Kaicasa RPUD PUD Amendment PDI-PL20220003938 Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Date: Monday, November 21, 2022 Time: 5:30 pm Location: Lipmans's Conference Room , 306 E. Main St. Immokalee, FL 34142 Attendees: Amanda Martin and Kaitlyn Zindle (Johnson Engineering, Inc.) Lisa Lefkow, Mara Foley and Wilna Cariany (Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc.) Nancy Gundlach (Collier County Growth Management) See attached sign -in sheets for public attendees. Meeting Summary: The meeting started at approximately 5:30 p.m. One additional attendee was present and inquired about homeownership qualifications (sign -in sheet attached). Amanda Martin introduced herself and the applicant representatives, Reverend Lisa Lefkow, Mara Foley and Wilna Cariany of Habitatfor Humanity of Collier County, Inc. She also noted that Nancy Gundlach, the Collier County Planning reviewer was in attendance and the meeting was being recorded. She explained the requirement for a Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) is to discuss the two proposed changes for the previously approved Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). She gave background on the location of the Kaicasa RPUD and the 2007 RPUD approval noting that no bonus density was received although affordability commitments were made in the PUD document. There is no request to change the previously approved Master Plan, density or uses. Since the initial approval in 2007, not only has Habitat for Humanity adjusted their policies, but the economy and goals for the Immokalee community has changed overall. Ms. Martin explained that the first request is to revise the income levels served from at or below 60% of median household income to serve up to and including 120% area median income (AMI). This change will bring the PUD commitment up to date with current policy of Habitat for Humanity, which is to provide home -ownership opportunities that are affordable for a mix of income levels. This request aligns with the recently adopted Immokalee Area Master Plan Housing Goal 4.2.3 which aims to "Provide a mix of housing types and price points to allow for safe, high -quality dwelling unit options in Immokalee." The second request is to increase affordability commitment from a period of at least fifteen (15) to thirty (30) years from the date of CO (certificate of occupancy). By extending the timeframe it will ensure the long-term affordability for homeowners. A participant asked how the proposed changes impact his application process. The applicant's representative inquired about the participants income level and estimated that his income level falls within the 60% AMI level, which meets the proposed income level affordability commitments. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:40. Page 1 Kaicasa PUDA Neighborhood Information Meeting November 21 s+, 2022 1 Lipmans's Conference Room 1 5:30 PM Sian In Sheet Name- Print Address Email lea � � � ,�tis/rr l=G ��I/y� a, v o ,c 13 2. :+ 7 I+ L 3. (o D CaJ Wca T ( Ck Y1 �af 6, 5.� 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. H. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. ASA RPUD AMENDMENT PL20220003938 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING November 21, 2022 Amanda Martin, AICP Lisa Lefkow Mara Foley TEAM Johnson Engineering, Habitat for Humanity Inc. of Collier Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. County, Inc. I rl�� U-4 f LOCATION • Previously approved Ordinance 2007-34 PROJECT LOCATION No bonus density • No requested changes to the Master Plan, density or uses REQUEST INCOME LEVELS SERVED BA. All of the dw ellinc, tulits co17-qti-ticted within the Kaicasa RPLTD shall be committed to occupancy by income restficted households at rye-lo arnuig up to and including 1 01-o of the mediaii aiAmal heuse �e Area Median Income (AM!) in Coltier County at the time of construction. Covenants and restfictions shall be applied to all of the dwelling nits within the Kaicasa 1 PLTD to ensure affordability of all dwelling units for a period of ai least fiftee tftu-t � dears fio � the date of iss at�ce of a certificate of occupancy c tart of the annual PUD monitoring retort the developer will include an annual rQport that pi-ovide.s the progress and monitoHn2 of this affordability commitment. REQUEST =FORDABILITY COMMITMENT BA. All of the Cl ellit cl MiTS c011stt-ttcted within the Kaicasa 1 PLTD shall be committed to occupancy by income restficted households at :F below 60 mig Lip To and includhig 1 ? % of the median . am+nal h useliaM �e Area Median hicome ( N-1I) in Collier Cotuity at the time of construction. Covenants and restrictions shall be applied to all of the dwelliYiD; WETS withal the Kaicasa RPUD to ensure affordability of all dwelling snits for a period of at least f eet this 04-5years fiom the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). As hart of the atrtlual PUD monitoring tLegot-t the developer will include an annual rQport that provides the progress and monitoHn2 of this affordabilitv commitment, THANK YOU Amanda Martin, AICP amartin(d)johnsoneng.com County Staff: Nancy Gundlach, AICP Nancy.Gundlach(Cbcol I iercountyfl.gov 8 Community Development and Environmental Services Division KAICASA RPUD M RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE KAICASA RPUD, A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 PREPARED BY: JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FL 34112 DATE REVIEWD BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-34 AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL 2008-15 and 2010-35 (Scrivener's errors) Exhibit "A" mike-tkrettglris text deleted Underline is text added SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments related to development of the Kaicasa RPUD. 5.2. GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with final subdivision plats and all applicable state and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD. The developer, its successor or assigns shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, its successor or assigns shall follow the Master Plan and the regulations of the RPUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor or assigns in title shall be subject to any commitments within this Document. 5.3. RPUD MASTER PLAN A. EXHIBIT 2, RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan application. Amendments may be made subject to the provisions of the LDC. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 5.4. SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENTIMONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION BA. All of the dwelling units constructed within the Kaicasa RPUD shall be committed to occupancy by income restricted households ° earning up to and including 120% of the median am+ual household ineeme Area Median Income (AMII in Collier County at the time of construction. Covenants and restrictions shall be applied to all of the dwelling units within the Kaicasa RPUD to ensure affordability of all dwelling units for a period of at least fifteen thirty (N04-5) years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO). As hart of the annual PUD monitoring report the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of this affordability commitment. E$. By the time building permits for 100 residential units are issued, the developer shall have constructed at least one playground area in the location shown on the RPUD Master Plan. v-1 B. A 100 foot wide drainage and maintenance easement, along the southern property line to encompass the existing canal and provide maintenance access along the northern bank, shall be conveyed to Collier County prior to issuance of the first CO. C. Base flood elevation approval shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and submitted to the County prior to the approval of any subsequent final development order. such as site development plans/construction plans. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) 5.7. UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by the developer. Potable water and sanitary sewer facilities constructed within the platted rights -of -way or within dedicated utility easements shall be conveyed to the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. B. Upon completion of the utility facilities, they shall be tested to ensure they meet the Immokalee Water and Sewer District construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. C. All customers connecting to the potable water and sanitary sewer system shall be customers of Immokalee Water and Sewer District. 5.8. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Kaicasa RPUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) regarding potential impacts to protected species on -site. A habitat management plan for protected species, including bear and panther, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to final construction plan approval. B. Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of the GMP shall be set aside as preserve areas. All preserve areas shall be identified as separate tracts and be protected by a permanent conservation easement to prohibit further development. All preserve areas shall be designated as preserve tracts on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation easements shall be dedicated on the plat to the Kaicasa homeowners' association, or like entity, for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. C. The applicant shall incorporate the "Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake" (Service 2002) into any County development orders authorizing any land clearing or construction activities. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) D. Compensation for impacts to wood stork and Florida panther habitats must be addressed as part of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Review Permit (ERP) process and the United States Army Corns of Engineers (USACE) permitting process jn consultation with the Florida Wildlife Service prior to site development plans/construction plans approval. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08 15) E. The applicant must include an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project during review of the first site development plan or first set of construction plans. This will be accomplished by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its predevelopment condition. This analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by federal and state water quality agencies. County review and approval of this analysis shall be required prior to construction plans/site development plan approval. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) F. The applicant shall be required to submit a full five-day wildlife survey_ at the time construction plans/site development plan are submitted. The survey must be less than one year old at the time of submittal. (Scrivener's error Ordinance 08-15) G. All preserve areas shall be evaluated at the time construction plans/site development plans are reviewed to ensure that such areas are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. V-3 I COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTU tO' TYPE "A- A-hsHO BUFFER 2SA'AF 10' TYPE "A" - I I R 4 f� BUFFER I I I L-- — — .— _ l / f / R HIGH I - LAKE d RESIDENTIAL I _ 1.48. AC 1 'PRESERVE ' 1 ` TO LOT ti � \ R \ \ I R\ \ R I I \ \ �1 1 R 10' TYPE 'D" ( - R 1 l BUFFER I '> P.AESERVE COLLIER COUNTY I - HOUSING AUTHORfTY FARMWORKER'S VILLAGE T \ OT 1 TYPE "B" I I I \ \ a FFER f ( 1 1 it LID i 1 \ ♦ - LAKE2'..:. ( I \ R \\ ( I - zD• TYPE "D \ R ♦ \ \ 1 o BUFFER \ \ c \ \ \ ! w \ SILVER STRAND 111 �O v PARTNERSHIP PRESERVE I Cb 100' CANAL n a EASEMENT m In LOW AESIDENTIAL ` O ry 7 HItlH ftEBIOENTiAL 10 TYPE 'A" BUFFER RI 0 125' 2�50' Ir5000' SCALE; — 500' COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS,LTO A -MHO LAND USE KEY RESIDENTIAL (R) -SV91a Family, Attached or Detached -Tam Family - Zero Lot Line -Duplex -Mullilamily -Common Area -Open Space -Water Management Areas -Tot Lot Recreation Area LEGEND PRESERVE ARFA WATER MANAGEMENT AREA RPUD BOUNDARY W RiGhj'.oF WAY PUD ADJACENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION PROJECTI.AND USE RESIDENTIAL USE AREA 48,95ACt LAKE 9.02 ACt PRESERVE' 30.18 ACt ROADSIROW 12.75 ACt TOTAL NET ACREAGE 100.00 ACt IMPERVIOUS AREA 23.50 ACt MINIMUM OPEN SPACE(60%6 B0.00 ACt 400 UNITS/100 AC, = 4 UNITS PER ACRE RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: I, Open apace rhall include aciive and passive recreation areas arch as playgttitio h, golf —r-sm, beach fmmego, waterways Iggoum, flood Plains, nahae trails Lmlotber 91iiiWar open ap—, including area set aside for pi —lion of nalivo vsgclatlon londscopcd arms. 2. T1rc RPUD mutLr plop shall be considered coacepttWl in nature. 3, the total number of dwelling units is limih:d to a MMIMum of 400 units 4. The dEsign and permining ofgll impmvements w€thin rho righRaFWay of Slam Road 29 shall be io accordonca with the Florida Depenmerit ofTramporialiun raqutremmts. 5. Within iha l[,dwa RPUD, a 61)Y. minimum open spgee alWll lx achtavnd over the whole development A minimum 25Y, native vegetation shall be rcuafxd a mite io include watland Wwn as and upland presmves ie atcordgpca with CoIg W Caunty Lard Developmem Code CDC LAND INVESTMENTS. INC. A -MHO •A MWIMUM OF 311.0 ACRES N4LL BE DEUNEATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVE TRACTS IN THE FINAL DESIGN AND PLATTING, A MINIMUM OF 24.11 ACRES IS REQUIRED PER THE LDC NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENT ON SITE, 2350 STANFORD COURT KAICASA RPUD NAPL,ES, FLORIDA 34112 MASTER PLAN PHONE FAX (23 39) 434 9320 ENGINEERIN G E-B. #842 L.B. 0642 DATE PROJECT NO, FILE ND. SCAiE SitE OCT 2006 2{7055i95 12-47-29 1" - 500' 1 EXHIBIT 2 (Approved Master Plan on 07/25/22 per PMC-PL20220004449) EXHIBIT 2 COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTD a-MHG 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER LAND USE KEY — —R— — — HIGH ftESIDENTUL RESIDENTIAL(R) r — h -Single Family, ARechad er LAKES R I I Detached 234 AG IO' TYPE ' I 10 TYPE 'A" -Two Fatuity BUFFER - _ I I I� BUFFER I� -Zero l.ot Line -Duplex — — — — Mu Nlamlly ( R -Common Area -Open Spaea HIGH LAKE4 -Water Manag MAroaa RESIDENTIA! 1,48 AC -Tat Lot AI- ion Area I PRESERVE I To LEGEND 1LOT \ P ERVEAPEA 0 125' 250' 50500' AtER MANACEMENTARE SCALE,`--- SOD, R_la.1.ARV \ \ R ` ` I I`R I `1 1 R 1 // II 10' TYPE 'D" I I BUFFER I I I PRESERVE I COLUER COONTY HOUSING AUTHORRY FARMWORKER'S VILLAGE I R "B... i TYPE FFER l n UO 1 \ ♦ - LAKIE2 I c \ \ I f R \ l \ I 20' TYPE "D t BUFFER :,,i.R TOT \ \ / LOT SILVER STRAND 111R0:.. \• \ / PARTNERSHIP PRESERVE Y- a.MHO 'pTr�. I h 100' CANAL EASEMENT rn / LOW gE$IDENTIAL 0 MIQ +t'j\Mj 2350 S, FLORIDAI-RCOURT D CO NAPEESA URT PHONE (239) 434-0313 NGINEERING FAXII 4ILS. 060 E.B. /'642 I. LB. �1642 — RIGnY-OP-wwY PUD PDJACENT ZONAVGClASS61GiroN LUC ADJAC—IL-PIJ ECUlaWFI.At PROJECT LAND USE COLLIER LAND RESIDENTIAL USE AREA 48,p5AGE HOLDINGS. LTD LAKE 9.02 ACE A -MHO PRESERVE' 70.18AC! ROADSIROW 12.75 ACx TOTAL NET ACREAGE f00.OD ACS IMPERVIDUSAREA 23.BOACd MINIMUM OPEN SPACE(60M( 6000 AC3 400 UNITS1100 AC. = 4 UNITS PER ACRE RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: L Oprn spaca dull include mlive end passive mcrmtion ereW aueN ei Plxygmunda, gulf eeunex, beach fmmegp, wakrweyf lagaum, OwJ P6im, neNm trails end mMr 91M19u open aPuc+, inpludmg attaa s<I nido Car prerervatbn of mlivp vegchd44 Iandacaped auras. 2.7Lu RPUD msamr plop dullbe casnidvW conmpaml in nasmc. 3. The -Nl number ofdwallmg anib ie Ismdwl N a maximum of400 units \C_,d and pcao+ctutugetation —IbeseLueC_,I Coda COC LAND INVESTMENTS. INC. A -MHO EXHIBIT 2 aA MINIMUM OF 30_D CRES WILL BE DELINEATED FOR THE kRPOSE OF PRESERVE TRACTS IN THE FINAL D GN AND PLATTING. A MINIMUM OF 24.11 AC IS REOUIREO PER THE LDC NATIVE VEGETA ETENTIDN REOUIREMENT ON SITE. KAICASA RPUD MASTER PLAN 17E PROJECT N0. RLE NO. SCAUC SLEET OCT 2006 20055i95 12-47-29 i" SOD' EXHIBIT EXHIBIT 2 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED AM 7*\) PA MAIM / V WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER Q - na,� Ir SIGNATUIR 11 WANT OR AGENT Amanda Martin, ATOP NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) 2122 Johnson Street STREET OR P.O. BOX Fort Mvers. FL 33901 CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this— day of 20-22,by &&,fDft MfilMN personally known to me or who Aroduced __%-7 as identification and who did/did not take an oath. I, ' CHRISTMA K GRAY /I►�fl Commission # HH 004378 Signature of Notary Public s.9. r, ExphsAugust 22, 2024 ,o's�;gP•' &MWTMu7myFain kuwenaes04.9667019 My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Ml /U Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 '� � � " L- � =�� ' I� r #� rr. i, . � . • � � ' • � • � � J y � ��a�j � !'T J ` � f % i i� - ,e � x/�� J '. '' T (' u � J � p .��tic �, r _ � p � J �� j� �F I� � � ', J e� �, _ � _ \ �� r��r , �� 5 � � 1i : _ I � `� �;� ,_ is i ` �1 i/-. ' l l _� � � ,/ �, err ��``l�.� ,;`''���1 _ -,� � _ ,� / f, 1` �, ��` �.''` � :_ ,� o _ r � _ / H . t t � i � r _ �. . i_ y � -% 1�I �/ f � � t_ �� , ' ;,,� � �-, �=� J� � f � ��1� i >>�,� � � ��� t ��� �� r % � f � i j 4 J f i t �. lei 1 � �9'y�� I j'.�,"t ��?` ��: '�� �' .. � \ 1 I 1^ � /l ., �\ �G '� t y_ . AI- �\�,' AN k A !lo N V Ale AA or Li AV y{ rI 7iL-�ii Iy:1�Ie\:�I�[ei�[� o rfP^ 4dPb _of f Ij - 1 , r Jx ei tp� .ai% i dr • i t f 1 ~ � wia J v a o �'r a. AN �All a 3 , � A��dyyf r loor z to ` 1��jft + P _ a x \ > ten; Na I kI ;;E! �s . „j y Al t '\� -ANc _ .. �._lkAN �A- 44 F4? \ +r \\ �� ' — -� F ie IN ]IN�� ,_.AI 19 OIL IN ZA IN N AL AIR v NA,A r e G @ k fAAAAF \ � _ �� IN IV WN AN AS, A AL *%�� I II4 \ IANAN .. _ F1��1�y t 'r / Is 11 AI ��' \