The URL can be used to link to this page

CAC Agenda 02/09/2023 Re-revised2/7/23, 2:54 PM February 9, 2023 1 Collier County, FL February 9, 2023 Meeting Agenda and Notice Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) Thursday, February 9, 2023— 1:00 p.m. Collier County Board Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Third Floor, Naples, FL TO JOIN MEETING VIA ZOOM, PLEASE USE THE LINK BELOW TO REGISTER: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN u6GUZd50 hicv3KlPc5L\TQ Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions 2o23 CAC MEETING DATES I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda V. Public Comments VI. Approval of CAC Minutes January i2, 2023 VII. Staff Reports Extended Revenue Report VIII. New Business 1. ES - CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. - 2023 Hardbottom Monitoring o Proposal 2. ES - Rick Croft Enterprises, Inc. dba Texas Trailers - (2) Mobile Cargo Units o Quote IX. Old Business 1. Update - USACE Collier CSRM - m5 P.M. TIME CERTAIN 2. Update - Emergency Berm Project https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/advisory-boards-and-authorities/coastal-advisory-committee/cac-agendas/2023-cac-agendas/february-9-20... 1 /2 2/7/23, 2:54 PM February 9, 2023 1 Collier County, FL 3. Update - Tigertail Lagoon / Sand Dollar Island Ecosystem Restoration X. Announcements XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date/Location March 9, 2023 at 1:oo p.m. XIII. Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Andrew Miller at (239) 252-2922. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 33oi East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. https://www.coll iercountyfl.gov/govern ment/advisory-boards-and-authorities/coastal-advisory-committee/cac-agendas/2023-cac-agendas/february-9-20... 2/2 January 12, 2023 MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Naples, Florida, January 12, 2023 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: David Trecker VICE CHAIRMAN: Joseph Burke Steve Koziar Thomas McCann (excused) Jim Burke Robert Raymond Robert Roth Raymond Christman Erik Brechnitz ALSO PRESENT: Andy Miller, Coastal Zone Manager Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney Farron Bevard, Management Analyst I 1 January 12, 2023 Anyone in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Communications, Government & Public Affairs Division or view it online. I. Call to Order Chairman Trecker called the meeting to order at 1 p.m. II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum of eight was established. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Brechnitz moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Raymond. The motion passed unanimously, 8-0. V. Public Comments [None; public comments involving Tigertail Lagoon were heard under IX.] VI. Approval of CAC Minutes December 8, 2022 Mr. Raymond moved to approve the minutes of the December 8, 2022, meeting. Second by Koziar. The motion passed unanimously, 8-0. VIL Staff Reports Extended Revenue Report "FY22 TDT Collections Revenue Report" dated November 30, 2022. Mr. Miller reported that the first month of the year is typically our slowest. But the first data point is well above what we had budgeted. It's almost identical to last year, but a little less on the percentage above budgeted. We budgeted $1.3 million and realized $2.3 million last year, so we did almost exactly the same. Chairman Trecker called that a good start for the new fiscal year. VIIL Old Business Executive Summary - Tigertail Lagoon / Sand Dollar Island Ecosystem Restoration Request for Additional Funding Chairman Trecker reported that. • This item relates to the Tiger Tail Lagoon -Sand Dollar Island Ecosystem Restoration Project. • The CAC is being asked to approve a request for $650,400 in Tourist Development Funds to cover a project overrun. • The amount was listed in a change -order for additional sand needed to complete the protective berm on Sand Dollar Island. • After CAC approval, the request would go to the Tourist Development Council for approval and then the Board of County Commissioners, who have final authorization. • The CAC will advise the TDC, but county commissioners make the final decision. 2 January 12, 2023 • The Executive Summary in the agenda packet was prepared by the Marco Island city manager, who is asking that the request be approved. • Andy Miller, representing staff, agrees, with the proviso that it be a one-time contribution, which reflects the fact that there will be significant ongoing expenses in coming years. • It's an understatement to say that feelings ran high on this project pro and con, so we need to take time to go through this thoroughly and not look like we're rubber stamping it. • We need to take public comments, review the request, discuss it thoroughly and vote. • He asked speakers to refrain from repeating what the CAC has already heard because we've taken a lot of input, both written and what was presented at the last meeting. • He asked speakers to hold comments to three minutes. Linda Columbo, Friends of Tigertail Beach, said: • We are a non-profit organization and are celebrating our 25th year. • Our mission is to preserve and protect the Tigertail area. We've been informed about the situation and need for the project to restore the area adjacent to Sand Dollar Spit and leading into the lagoon at Tigertail Beach Park. • The approved project is in progress, but there's a need for supplemental funding of the overrun due to Hurricane Ian, which reduced the sand available in the permitted dredge template, and for increasing the sand required to build a protective berm on Sand Dollar Island, as it was designed. • Staff has recommended spending the extra cost. • This berm, as designed, will provide storm protection from the newly reopened lagoon -flow channel connecting the southern lagoon adjacent to the park with the northern gulf entrance. • This flow enhances tidal flow and water quality needed to protect the Florida Fish & Wildlife critical area, an important recreational area for residents and visitors, who enjoy bird watching, kayaking, paddleboarding and fishing. • The beach berm restores a large section of Sand Dollar Island's shoreline within the county park. • For a while, walkers couldn't enjoy the two -mile -long Sand Dollar Island coastline to the end of Sand Dollar Island. • The supplemental funds are being requested from Tourist Development Funds. We know this area is eligible for funding, according to the minutes of the December 12th Coastal Advisory Committee. Assistant Collier County Attorney Colleen Greene said that pass and inlet maintenance and lagoon maintenance are all authorized expenditures of the Tourist Development Tax. The key question is the benefit to the county, the promotion of tourism and public access. • This area is accessible from Tigertail Park, from walkers entering the Collier County south beach, as well as hotel beach accesses. • Recreational boaters use Sand Dollar Island at the northern point to gain access. • In the Friends of Tigertail Beach's eyes, this project is tourist and resident driven. The park has had over 200,000 visitors in some years. • Collier County must recognize the negative impact of not completing this project correctly. It would greatly impact tourist visits, their willingness to return and county revenue. • To not properly complete the project would be like trying to stop an open, bleeding wound with Band -aids instead of sutures. • If the berm is not built intelligently with the needed sand, it will erode more quickly and require maintenance sooner. We need to get it right the first time. January 12, 2023 Mike McNees, Marco Island City Manager, said: • Thanks to the CAC for its speed in hearing the request, which the city made recently. The CAC already has had two hearings, so he appreciates county staff's effort to get it to the CAC for a decision. • Tigertail Beach Park gets about 200,000 visitors a year, down from nearly 500,000 visitors yearly, so there's a significant tourism element. • What happens if this addition to the project isn't funded to supplement the project? Who loses out? We believe it's visitors to Tigertail Park because the lagoon will suffer. • All that part of the project is outside of the Hideaway Beach direct -benefit zone. • There are two elements that people object to. One is that it's going to cost Marco Island city taxpayers money if you approve this. That's a fabrication, a fantasy. There is no general fund money. The Hideaway Beach Tax District money is the only money that went into this ecosystem for more than 10 years. • The other opposition is about the ecosystem and that this project won't be beneficial in the long term. Every regulatory agency conducted a very extensive review process and issued permits, saying they believe this is in the best interest of the ecosystem in the long term. That's a valid reasons to push this forward to the TDC. • This is very important to Marco Island and we appreciate county staff's and the CAC's assistance. Dave Crane, Marco Island resident (not a Hideaway Beach Tax District resident) • He's in support of the proposal and called it very needed. • Mr. McNees noted that the number of tourists decreased at Tigertail Beach. That's a direct result of the area's deterioration, so kayaking and other activities aren't what they used to be. • When he moved here in 2008, he and his son used to work at Tigertail, helping people get kayaks. That's where it needs to come back, to get the people back there. • He's strongly in favor of the project and wants it done. It needs to be done right the first time. Chris Dowell, Marco Island resident (not a Hideaway Beach Tax District resident) • It was a misrepresentation that people thought money was coming from Marco Island city funds. They now know it will come from county Tourist Development Council funds. • What we're most concerned about is that we've lost bird habitat. It's been destroyed. • The project should have been looked at more toward cleaning out the lagoon, which is abominable. Ashley Jenkins, Naples city resident and local clean water advocate, said: • It's her understanding that we're moving $24 million in funds to create dunes on our beaches from the devastation incurred during Hurricane Ian, but no one has mentioned dredging sand in Naples Bay or the Gordon River. • There also hasn't been any movement to treat or test our sand or our gulf water, which she will discuss with the DEP on December 19. She was told they had no treatment protocols for our beaches or gulf. • This seems to be a large opportunity for your influence toward our governor's $3.5 billion clean environmental projects initiative. • The City of Naples has existing treatment protocols in the Parkshore area and these solutions could be applied at our local beaches. • She looks forward to having continuing conversations with CAC members individually. Chairman Trecker thanked her and said the CAC would be considering her concerns in the next 4 January 12, 2023 item, the emergency dune Project. He reported that: • He received other input that's in the agenda packet, 17 emails and many calls, many from people who didn't understand the project or had misgivings. • Many complaints were based on an erroneous assumption that they were going to be taxed, that there would be a direct tax on Marco residents. That's not being proposed. • People who spoke here made many other good points. • People on both sides of the issue feel strongly. • The summary he made from the December meeting is in the agenda packet; a few items changed since he submitted it. • The key question is: will a successful project benefit the county, promote tourism and enhance public access? The answer is clearly yes. It should promote visitors to Tigertail Beach and Sand Dollar Island, tourism and public access should somewhat improve. • We don't know the extent of the benefit, but that's true of other county projects the CAC approves TDC funds for. Nobody knows what the return on investment is going to be. • Can the county afford the $650,400 expenditure? Yes. The coffers are full, collections continue to be robust and capital reserves are high. • Marco Island residents, businesses and rental businesses contribute to the TDC funds. • Could the overrun be funded by other sources? Yes, the Hideaway Beach Tax District could pay more, the City of Marco Island has tools for raising money, and FEMA and DEP could directly provide hurricane -recovery grants. • Will additional expenditures be required? Yes. This is not a one-time expenditure. It's a dynamic system, so periodic dredging and sand restoration will be needed in the future. Additional funds will be required to comply with permit requirements. There are requirements for monitoring, so the $4.1 million charge for successfully completing this project is just the beginning. • There's no basis to turn down this request. He supports this but is troubled by allegations of water pollution. • It's a lot of money to approve for uncertain benefits. • He supports Andy's proposal for one-time funding. That sends the message that this isn't an open-ended approval. He asked other council members for their input. [That prompted questions.] Dr. Mohamed Dabees (the engineer from Humiston & Moore Engineers who designed and managed the project), answered CAC members' questions: • The sand would be placed on Sand Dollar Island, extending from the Collier County park for about I1/z miles along the middle section of Sand Dollar Island, the section marked in yellow. • $650,400 is for additional sand to be taken from the offshore borough area (the top left corner of the map). It will be placed primarily at the park shoreline, the south part of the template. That has a capacity of about 100,000 yards, but we're only asking for 60,000. • It would be placed on the southern end. • The photo shows the shoreline of Tigertail Beach Park post -hurricane. There's water and dead vegetation, but no beach, so that part will receive the 60,000 plus cubic yards. [He showed a video of the area before and what it would look like after the work]. • In addition to creating the flow channel, it will make Tigertail Lagoon a two-mile long lagoon, rather than the enclosed pond that exists now. Mr. Raymond said he's comfortable with the project. January 12, 2023 Mr. Burke said his initial concern was going back to the December meeting, that tourist tax money was going to be used to enhance a private beach, but the discussions in December and today, and the material distributed dispelled that concern, so he supports the proposal. Chairman Trecker noted that they were considering two related proposals. One is to approve it as requested, and one as proposed by Andy, that staff language be included as a one-time contribution. Mr. Burke said he'd support the one-time contribution. Mr. Brechnitz said: • The Hideaway Beach Tax District gets no special benefit from renourishing the Tigertail Lagoon, other than that they're residents of Marco Island and all residents will benefit. • Yet Hideaway Beach Tax District is paying for a significant part of the lagoon's renourishment because they think it's the right thing to do. So the notion that it's their responsibility isn't true. • The environmental issues raised during the permitting process were given hearings by all agencies. The Conservancy, the Audubon Society and others had an opportunity to present their case. Despite that, Florida Fish & Wildlife, the Army Corps of Engineers and Florida DEP all decided there was a great ecological benefit and approved it. • We are losing bird habitat at one end of the project, but by creating the berm, we're creating more bird habitat than we're taking away. Nesting birds will have more area than they had before. • The notion that county and TDC funds shouldn't be used for this project is bewildering. This is a county park. It doesn't belong to the city or Hideaway Beach Tax District. It's a lagoon next to Tigertail Beach Park, the single largest beach -access point on Marco Island. • It's a major birding and shelling area and used to be a major kayaking area until the lagoon became shallow and unmanageable for kayaks. A vendor rented kayaks for many years there. We hope to restore that by taking it back to pre -Hurricane Irma conditions, pre-2017. • This clearly is a project that's eligible for TDC dollars not just now, but forever. The notion that the responsibility ends doesn't make sense, that when we dredge Clam Pass, it's a one- time thing and our responsibility ends. • We have a $60 million balance in our reserve account. We're asking for 1 % of $60 million, so $650,400 won't jeopardize future projects the CAC and TDC consider. It's a smaller request than others we consider. • It's the county's and TDC's responsibility to make sure the park continues to be a major access point for tourists on Marco Island. • Marco Island is a significant contributor of TDC funds, about a third or more, and we ask for very little. Rarely are we here with projects that the CAC and TDC consider. • This project has merit and should be approved. He can't understand why they're having such a lengthy discussion when it's clear. Chairman Trecker asked if he supported the project. Mr. Brechnitz said he won't vote against it. Chairman Trecker asked if he supported the proviso that it be a one-time contribution. Mr. Brechnitz said the county has an obligation to maintain that lagoon. It's contiguous to a county park, so it should be their continuing responsibility. Vice Chairman Burke asked Andy if the county could support the project from a purely technical perspective. Mr. Miller said that based on the county attorney's opinion that tourist development tax dollars can be used for the project, he supports it. To the extent that the state has issued a permit that shows Gel January 12, 2023 there's a net benefit to the public, he'd be disappointed to see the lagoon get so stagnant that odors and smells make people reluctant to go there. The park would suffer dearly, so he's in support of the project and expenditure. Vice Chairman Burke said: • He looks at it from a technical and environmental perspective. • There was one person, an engineer, who the technical aspects of the project from the environmental side. As Erik indicated, the agencies that reviewed it and issued permits agreed from an environmental standpoint that it should stand on those merits. • He supports the project with the understanding that, for now, it's a one-time contribution until we understand why it's not the county's responsibility. That's a discussion we need to have. Mr. Roth said. • He's not looking at it from a technical or environmental perspective because they have a permit, it had a rigorous review and the work is proceeding under the permit. • The City Manager said 500,000 people originally went to that park, but it's now 200,000. He went there Monday and no one was there. Photos also show no one using the beach, but that may have been due to the time of day. • There used to be boat, kayak and paddleboard rentals there, but the county closed that down two years ago, as well as the concession stand, so he's not comfortable with the level of activity they claim was there. But people and tourists do go there, use the park and walk on the beach. • The sand spit boaters used to congregate on is now an 8-foot depression, a sand trap. Now that Keewaydin Island has become so overcrowded, he uncertain if boaters will be allowed to use that anymore. • He's trying to determine if this is really due to Hurricane Ian. It says the available sand was reduced by the permitted -dredge template. The majority of the material being removed is underwater. To what extent was sand lost above the template or did the bottom contour change so you're not coming up with that material. He doesn't see where the 60,000 yards was lost. Dr. Dabees said: • The majority of losses were on over -wash, the weak part of where we're constructing the berm because that part was pushed in by 100 feet landward, on average, and in its over -wash, the losses were close to 100,000 yards through erosion. • There also was build up in areas we cannot reach, including where the spit is attached to the mangrove. They are 3-4 feet high inside the mangrove. We would have been able to collect that sand before it got over -washed, but it's now inside the vegetation. • By the sand spit, 100 feet landward, the bottom is deeper. When the contractor arrived onsite, they said that wasn't what they'd bid for. They were supposed to take the sand spit and flip it in one handling. Now they have to double handle it or transport it north to south because it's more than double -handling of the material. • The hurricane impacted the site. The area in the photos didn't look that bad and this is an area that for us to anchor the berm at the beach park requires 100,000 cubic yards. That area is totally outside of Hideaway Beach Tax District's boundaries. It's part of Marco Island, an area with many vacation rental homes that offer easy access to the beach. • When people come to the beach, they don't expect to see vegetation and dry beach, so the 60,000-100,000 yards will be placed in the park shoreline at a cost of less than $11 a yard. 7 January 12, 2023 • Sand usually goes for $60-$70 a yard, so the cost of not doing it is costly. We now have a contractor that is mobilized with equipment that would enable us to add this sand, minus mobilization, at a cost that probably will never be available to us again. • The $650,400 can only buy you 10,000 yards if you truck sand into the park. We're going to put between 60,000 and 100,000 cubic yards of sand down. Mr. Roth asked if it was Hurricane Ian that reduced the sand available within the permitted dredge template. Dr. Dabees said that was correct. Mr. Roth noted that. • This board can make this determination because it's a beach facility or channel. • The board needs to make a finding that it promotes tourism. • He questioned if this was a CAC matter. It's unusual to have a one-time contribution. It should be all the time. It should go to the BCC, which has the final say. • Andy tried to mitigate some concerns by calling it a one-time contribution, which is unusual. • He's not supporting a one-time contribution because he has too many misgivings about whether the county is getting a benefit to tourism. It should be all the time or not a matter for this board. Mr. Christman said. • He didn't have enough information in December. • He has since met with Dr. Dabees to educate himself on the project. • He wanted to determine whether there was sufficient public benefit or does it overly benefit Hideaway Beach Tax District. • Is there a sufficient public benefit in terms of access to justify this project or is this only going to benefit Hideaway Beach Tax District? He's persuaded that there are public benefits from a public -access standpoint with the lagoon and the park. This will enhance that significantly. • Are there environmental benefits? That's difficult to answer conclusively. This project area has a long history and some issues involving birding and other matters started years ago. Based on permits that were granted, the review by DEP and other agencies, he concurs that the net environmental benefits are positive and that the project would be beneficial to Marco Island, the county and region. • Can we afford this? 82% of the cost is being paid for by Hideaway Beach Tax District, even with the proposed county funding. • He agrees with others' comments. Hurricane Ian may change this, but we've had trouble spending TDC money. We ended 2022 with $60 million in the reserve account, which is awkward and embarrassing. We shouldn't be throwing money at bad projects just because we have $60 million, but this is a worthwhile project and we can afford it. • Is there a possibility of FEMA reimbursement? That shouldn't determine whether we approve it, but could we submit this? Mr. Miller said he didn't know for sure if FEMA or FDEP could provide funds. They're still looking at that. The governor just provided $100 million -plus in funds to provide storm relief to various counties and we could pursue that. Mr. Christman said the point is, we can pursue that. So it's possible if we approve this project that all of the $650,400 or a portion could be reimbursed to us? Mr. Miller said it could be. r2 January 12, 2023 Mr. Christman added: • From a public policy standpoint, it's a bad idea for this to be a one-time request. We don't do this with other projects. • He was told that periodically there will be a need to come back and do lagoon work. That's true of a lot of projects along our coastline to keep the ecosystem sustainable. It's no surprise that it's every five, six or seven years this area will have to be looked at. None of us are going to be on this advisory council and the same BCC members probably won't be here. • If it comes back, we don't know what form it might take. That will be up to CAC and BCC, but for us to propose a one-time payment precedent is bad policy. • He supports the project, but not the one -year -only provision. Mr. Koziar said. • It's clear that Tigertail Beach Park is solely a county responsibility and since he's been on this committee, Tigertail Beach Park has been neglected. • He supports Mr. Christman's belief that whenever they voted on a project, he was voting on the project on a one-time basis and that it wouldn't be continuing approval. It's project by project. • We shouldn't say this is a one-time expenditure and send a signal that additional funding would not be spent in the future. • All our projects require monitoring and regulatory considerations, so he supports it. • We should remove the one-time language and make a finding that this benefits the public. Chairman Trecker said that was very helpful He noted that there wasn't adequate support to approve this as a one-time project. He asked to entertain a motion to recommend approval. He noted that the recommendation at the bottom of the Executive Summary, page 2, should read "Change Order No. 2," not No. 1. Attorney Greene agreed but said the top of the page does say No. 2. Chairman Trecker asked to entertain a motion to recommend approval of the expenditure of Tourist Development Tax Fund 195 money in the amount of $650,400 for Change Order No. 2 and to find that the expenditure promotes tourism. Mr. Roth said he changed his position because they agreed to remove the one-time language. Mr. Christman said he wanted to make the record clear that this doesn't assure that future similar requests will be approved, but it won't prevent similar requests from moving forward. Mr. Brechnitz moved to approve and recommend the expenditure of Tourist Development Tax Fund 195 funding in the amount of $650,400 for Change Order No. 2 to the City of Marco Island's contract with Ahtna Marine & Construction for the 2022 Tigertail Lagoon /Sand Dollar Island Ecosystem Restoration Project and made a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Koziar. The motion passed unanimously, 8-0. [Chairman Trecker polled each CAC member verbally and the vote was 8-0.] Chairman Trecker noted that the BCC will make the final decision. IX. New Business Executive Summary - Expenditure of Funds of a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $24,000,000 for the Construction of an Emergency Berm M January 12, 2023 Mr. Miller reported that: • We had a significant hurricane, if not two, that caused a lot of damage to the county, especially the county's beaches, and dunes, in particular. • We hope to get FEMA reimbursement for these dunes, but FEMA has a stipulation that emergency work must be completed within six months of the event, so we would typically go through three board actions and advertise for bids. That could take many months. • We're trying to expedite getting funding approved for the emergency berm in advance so the County Manager can execute contracts and get contractors on the beach building dunes. • If all goes according to plan, the dunes will be in place before FEMA's deadline, we'd be eligible for 75% reimbursement of the $24 million and would then seek additional funds from the state for the balance. Chairman Trecker noted that they're talking about berms, but it's really dune construction. Mr. Miller agreed. We had a substantial meeting with FEMA yesterday and they were in total agreement that the wording causes confusion. But we're rebuilding the dune or building an emergency dune. Someone at FEMA refuses to change the definition. Chairman Trecker said he understands that the general intent is to provide the structures behind them with some protection from a five-year storm, not a major hurricane. Mr. Miller said that's the intent. Chairman Trecker said they're talking about moving quickly to get the construction underway so the county has a chance of meeting the March 23, 2023, deadline. He was concerned they wouldn't meet it because we're starting too late, but you indicated that it's doable. Mr. Miller said the amount is about double last year's Naples Beach project, 86,000 tons. We did that from November lst to just before Thanksgiving and completed that amount in about three weeks. Although this is about double that, we want to bring on two contractors and probably two sand sources, so we're going to be scrambling, but it's physically possible to do the work. A discussion ensued with Mr. Miller and the following points were made: • APTIM originally said it would be 500,000 cubic yards but is now saying 400,000. • The county has the funds for the project. • We'd be eligible for FEMA reimbursement of 75%. • The county has obtained all easements for all beaches from Delnor Wiggins down to Gordon Pass, 18th Avenue South and down to Marco Island, but is working on some private beaches, Barefoot Beach and Port Royal. Nearly the entire Barefoot Beach is eligible for FEMA and TDC funding. • They'd start where sand is most needed, at the Naples Beach and the Park Shore Beach. • The designer started about 11/2 weeks ago and has multiple teams working on it. Early estimates are showing that Naples Beach needs about 110,000 cubic yards, so we've asked him to expedite the design for Naples Beach, knowing it will be the most significant chunk, so we need to start that early. • The second area will be Barefoot Beach, Vanderbilt Beach and Pelican Bay. • The first phase was simple beach clearance and repair and getting beaches back in shape so they could be used. • The second phase is rebuilding the dunes to provide some minimal protection for structures behind them. • The third phase, the largest, will be a major sand renourishment, bringing in huge amounts of sand to replace what was lost. That's a two- to three-year project and scheduling hasn't been January 12, 2023 decided. • The amount of sand lost on beaches is more like 500,000 cubic yards, not 400,000. • Most of the beaches are in the City of Naples. • Depending on the final design, dunes would be about 2- to 4-feet high and about 30 feet wide at the top, not including the slope, on either side, seaward and landward. We'll probably have a 6-to-1 slope, a fairly flat slope that's easily walkable. • There will be vegetation planted on the dunes, but the FEMA reimbursement is still in question. FEMA's criteria for dune planting being eligible for reimbursement is that there is a local requirement for the dunes to be planted. For example, if a city ordinance required anyone building a home and/or building a dune on the beach, the dune must be vegetated. If that's a requirement, then we may be eligible. There are other circumstances that may provide the county with relief from that requirement, but we'll have to explore those. • If the Board of County Commissioners wants the dunes, and he highly recommends that they do get planted, just stabilize them, if nothing else, we can entertain a project request through the 195 Fund. Mr. Christman said many residents asked him if it makes sense to underlay any new dunes with concrete to provide more stability and a better foundation long-term. That adds a lot more complexity in terms of cost, timing, etc. Has this been a conversation with your team, FEMA and the city? Mr. Miller said yes and no. From the outset, we thought we were going to bring in sand and there were minor discussions related to stabilization. The problem with putting structural material on a beach is permitting issues. That complicates it and adds time, so it wouldn't be feasible. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: • If the county shows it's making a good -faith effort to get it done, we hope FEMA will be flexible and allow an extension to the March 23 deadline. • Today's vote is to get the work started. • Because hauling would have a major impact during high -season in the City of Naples, Andy has been speaking with city staff weekly and they're asking City Utilities Director Bob Middleton to get preferred truck routes in place as soon as possible. • Out of $24 million, APTIM's engineering cost is $150,000-$180,000, an insignificant amount. • $60 per cubic yard is the average cost for all -in, including engineering. • 6.0 NAVD is the top elevation of the berm. • The maximum FEMA will make eligible is 6 cubic yards per lineal foot of beach. The rule is it's either a five-year storm, still -water elevation, plus wave run-up, whatever elevation that is. Any sand in that dune is eligible. The maximum we could get is 6 cubic yards per lineal foot, and our engineer essentially designed it to maximize that. • The bathymetric surveys are complete. We've surveyed every 1,000 feet and the engineer came in with that report. The sand is just the sand we lost is offshore, in between the high beach and the depth of closure, which is around 1 I feet. The sand is still in that area. If the sand is still in the sandbox, FEMA says then you haven't lost sand. For us, that's the issue. We really haven't lost any because it's still in the system. • That doesn't make it more amenable to dredging. To dredge, the sand is spread out in such a large area over 11-15 miles and it varies depending on where it might be, so dredging is more complicated permitting -wise. We don't have a permit to dredge the sand offshore. • We haven't addressed hardbottom impacts yet. We'll be doing our annual hard -bottom monitoring this summer, so that's currently unknown. 11 January 12, 2023 • Whether dune construction will extend through the central beach at Marco is unknown at this point. If so, that would impact traffic on Collier Boulevard. There is eligible dune replacement on Marco Island, particularly the southern end. • The county also has been asked by Cape Marco to help with their dunes, a temporary measure before hurricane season begins. • This is a temporary measure before hurricane season arrives and could be reimbursed by FEMA. • 75% FEMA reimbursement would total $18 million. • The county will put emergency dunes in place to provide immediate protection to beaches. • We're probably going to follow that effort up with a major renourishment similar to what we did in Vanderbilt, Naples and Pelican Bay last year. According to FDEP, if we can take advantage of the $1 million in state funds to do hurricane -recovery beach restoration, we'll build the beaches back to their permitted template and potentially realize 100% reimbursement. • The amount of sand is about 500,000 cubic yards, which was in the permitted template that we lost, so that's on the borderline between entertaining the idea of a hopper -dredge offshore or getting a BOEM lease, which allows us to dredge the sand from 30 miles offshore. We'll look at that, but 500,000 cubic yards is doable with two contractors and if you spread that project over two to four years, it's easily manageable with trucks. • It's a possibility that if there is a five-year storm the berms won't be there, but the county could take advantage of state and TDC funds if it's eligible for dune plantings. State funds are significant and the county can afford to do this. • It would be hard to add an underlying, more resistant structure to hold the berm in place due to turtles nesting and permitting issues. There also would be a lot of environmental pushback. Mr. Brechnitz recommended approving the expenditure of Tourist Development Tax funds of a not -to -exceed amount of $24, 000, 000for the construction of an emergency berm necessary for protection of upland structures left vulnerable by Hurricane Ian and made a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Raymond. The motion passed unanimously, 8-0. X. Announcements [Discussed after XI] Vice Chairman Burke asked if there were any updates from the Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. Miller said he'd have to ask Gary McAlpin and his team because they're involved with that. He asked him to email him and he'd forward it to Gary and his team. Chairman Trecker asked if Gary could make a report at the CAC meeting. Mr. Christman said he'd heard there had been developments on that and asked if it could be put on the agenda for next month. XI. Committee Member Discussion Chairman Trecker asked Mr. Roth, chairman of the CAC Water -Quality Subcommittee, if he had a subcommittee report. Mr. Roth said he did and reported that: • The subcommittee met yesterday with (Pollution Control Manager) Danette Kinaszczuk and (Principal Environmental Specialist) Rhonda Watkins and Farron Turner from Coastal Zone Management. • We feel that the first subcommittee, from 2019 to 2021, identified the three most important things the county can do to protect and improve coastal water quality, separate from what is 12 January 12, 2023 being studied and done by other organizations regarding red tide, etc. • One was to enforce fertilizer ordinances because fertilizers are a significant source of nitrogen and phosphorus, which is what's plaguing coastal waters. • The second was to improve the educational program for landscapers who apply fertilizer. Marco Island just took that initiative on to ensure everybody is on the same page. We've had laws for a while, but we've lacked enforcement. The word has gone out that landscapers will be held accountable and will be checked on proper procedures. • The third was to ensure that all new wastewater plants and expansions to existing plants be upgraded to Advanced Wastewater Treatment standards, which would remove harmful nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus. That will improve irrigation re -use water, which ends up in the canals and ocean. • Those are very valid recommendations. To add to that, the current subcommittee considered Vertical Oyster Gardens (VOGs), a public -education program the county could coordinate and administer. But we later found it would be far more complicated because someone has to collect oyster shells, string them together and make them available and that's something the county can't administer by itself. A volunteer organization would be needed to assist. • We learned that in the Rock Creek in the Brookside development already started something similar. Residents are collecting oyster shells, stringing them and hanging them from their docks, so we're going to leave that alone. • We learn a tremendous amount from Danette and Rhonda, our technical advisors, so we thought they could come before the full CAC a few times a year to provide an update on what Collier County Pollution Control is doing and what they're finding. There are many things occurring that we're not aware of. • We don't see a future purpose for our subcommittee and believe it should be disbanded because it's served its useful purpose. • If the full CAC wants us to continue, he's willing to remain involved. Chairman Trecker said he didn't think they should disband the water -quality effort. We need to keep it going in some fashion. We worked very hard to get the BCC to include it as part of our mission. He'd hate to lose that, so we need to keep it going. He's pleased they liked the prior subcommittee's recommendations. Danette was very helpful in helping us craft our recommendations. He'd like to speak to Andy and Danette to see if we can push some of those recommendations forward within the limits of the Sunshine Act. Commissioners would probably be amenable because they're not onerous or costly. Mr. Christman said. • He's happy to continue on the subcommittee, but if they want to appoint others, that's fine. • Water quality is incredibly important. We have many water -quality issues, but the frustration or dysfunction needs to be addressed: The three recommendations by the prior subcommittee were presented to the BCC and there's been no response. That was several years ago. • The VOGs idea is good, but staff doesn't have the capacity to reach out to volunteer non- profit groups and others to see if there's interest. Staff has been reduced and can't take on additional assignments. • For the subcommittee to be effective, there needs to be a conversation at the county manager or deputy county manager level to ask if they support providing a staff liaison for the CAC Water -Quality Subcommittee, so we could get the information we need and consider projects or programs that we might want to recommend for approval. That linkage isn't there now, so the staffing issue needs to be addressed. 13 January 12, 2023 Chairman Trecker reported that. • The recommendations were accepted by the BCC. • The subcommittee didn't follow up and he's sorry about that. It was accepted pro forma. What we should have done is an impressive presentation and made specific recommendations to get a yes or no vote. • He asked Attorney Greene what kind of meeting notice would be required if Andy and several others got together for such a discussion. Attorney Greene reported that: • A meeting will require notice. • A solution would be to have one more meeting of the current subcommittee so you could publicly notice the subcommittee meeting. They can work with Andy and invite Danette, if she's available. Any CAC member also could attend. • The best way to do it is by reconvening another meeting. • Two of the three members are needed for a quorum. Chairman Trecker asked the subcommittee chairman if that was acceptable. Mr. Roth said they need someone from senior management to come to the meeting to determine if any of the recommendations are feasible to pursue. Chairman Trecker said they could invite senior management and asked other subcommittee members if that was acceptable. [They said it was.] XII. Next Meeting February 9, 2023, 1 p.m. XIII. Adjournment There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chairman at 2:38 p.m. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee David Trecker, Chairman These minutes were approved by the Committee on , (check one) as presented, _ or as amended 14 Collier County Tourist Development Tax Revenue FY 23 TDT Collections Report 31-Dec-2022 Fund Reporting Fund Adopted Budget Updated Annual Forecast Budgeted YTD YTD Actual Variance to Budgeted YTD Beach Park Facilities 183 184 193 194 195 196 198 758 1,175,500 1,240,426 114,103 179,067 64,963 TDC Promotion 11,544,400 12,292,489 1,120,589 1,678,539 557,950 Non -County Museums 627,100 661,736 60,871 95,294 34,423 TDCAdmin - - 0 - - Beach Renourishment 12,799,000 13,505,918 1,242,371 1,949,120 706,749 Disaster Recovery - - 0 - - County Museums 2,000,000 2,000,000 194,136 384,327 190,192 TDC Capital 4,688,8001 4,947,773 455,131 714,396 259,265 Gross Budget 32,834,800 34,648,342 3,187,202 5,000,743 1,813,542 Less 5% Rev Res 1 (1,641,700)1 5.52% % Over/(Under) Bud 56.9% Net Budget 31,193,100 Collections Month Reported Actual Cum YTD % Budget Collected to Date % Variance FY22 Collections % Variance FY21 Collections % Variance FY20 Collections Nov 2,354,075 2,354,075 7.17% 4.59% 98.49% 68.44% Dec 2,646,668 5,000,743 15.23% -9.02% 66.799/6 27.96% Jan - 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Feb 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Mar 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Apr 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a May 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a June 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a July 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Aug Sept Oct 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Total 5,000,743 5,000,743 YTD -3.08% 80.35% 44.28% 34,648,342 Budget Comparison 5 Yr History- Cum 5 Yr History- Monthly Budgeted Collections Actual Collections Budget to Actual Variance Updated Forecast Nov Dec 4.2% 9.7% 4.2% 1,365,982 2,354,075 988,093 2,354,075 5.5% 1,821,219 2,646,668 825,448 2,646,668 Jan 18.6% 8.9% 2,919,311 - - 2,919,311 Feb 30.9% 12.3% 4,026,494 4,026,494 Mar 44.7% 13.9% 4,555,896 4,555,896 Apr 62.0% 17.2% 5,656,127 5,656,127 May 72.7% 10.7% 3,509,645 3,509,645 June 79.1% 6.5% 2,119,755 2,119,755 July 84.8% 5.7% 1,867,801 1,867,801 Aug 90.5% 5.7% 1,869,836 1,869,836 Sept 95.1% 4.6% 1,517,914 1,517,914 Oct 100.0% 4.9% 1,604,819 1,604,819 Total 100.0% 100.0% 32,834,800 5,000,743 1,813,542 34,648,342 % over/(under) budget 56.9 % 5.520/6 Tourist Development Tax Collection Curve $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 -e�aaerea caneuo: $5,000,000 $4,000,000 �A<Nal COIIeRions $3,000,000 $2,000,000 t� $1,000,000 2 0 LL ¢ ¢ ,n O Month Reported F:\OMB\TDC Revenue\TDC Update Report\2023\TDT Tax Collector Reports\02-TDC Updates December Collier County Tourist Development Tax Revenue FY 23 TDT Collections Report 31-Dec-2022 Fund Reporting Fund Adopted Budget Updated Annual Forecast Budgeted YTD YTD Actual Variance to Budgeted YTD Beach Park Facilities 183 184 193 194 195 196 198 758 1,175,500 1,240,426 114,103 179,067 64,963 TDC Promotion 11,544,400 12,292,489 1,120,589 1,678,539 557,950 Non -County Museums 627,100 661,736 60,871 95,294 34,423 TDCAdmin - 0 - - Beach Renourishment 12,799,000 13,505,918 1,242,371 1,949,120 706,749 Disaster Recovery - 0 - - County Museums 2,000,000 2,000,000 194,136 384,327 190,192 TDC Capital 4,688,800 4,947,773 455,131 714,396 259,265 Gross Budget 32,834,800 34,648,342 3,187,202 1 5,000,743 1 1,813,542 Less 5%Rev Res 1 (1,641,700)1 5.52% 1 % Over/(Under) Bud 56.9% Net Budget 31,193,1 Collections Month Reported Actual Cum YT % Budget Collected to Date % Variance FY22 Collections % Variance FY21 Collections % Variance FY20 Collections Nov Dec 2,354,075 2,646,668 2,354,075 7.17% 4.59% 98.49% 68.44°/a 27.96% 5,000,743 15.23% -9.02% 66.79% Jan - 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Feb 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Mar 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Apr 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a May 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a June 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a July 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a Aug Sept Oct 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a n/a 5,000,743 15.23% n/a n/a 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,000,743 1 15.23% Total 5,000,743 5,000,743 1 YTD 1 -3.08% 80.35% 44.28% F:\OMB\TDC Revenue\TDC Update Report\2023\TDT Tax Collector Reports\02-TDC Updates December Collier County Tourist Development Tax Revenue Budget Comparison 5 Yr History- Cum 5 Yr History- Monthly Budgeted Collections Actual Collections Budget to Actual Variance Updated Forecast Nov Dec 4.29/6 9.79/6 4.29/6 1,365,982 2,354,075 988,093 2,354,075 5.5% 1,821,219 2,646,668 825,448 2,646,668 Jan 18.6% 8.9% 2,919,311 - - 2,919,311 Feb 30.9% 12.3% 4,026,494 4,026,494 Mar 44.7% 13.9% 4,555,896 4,555,896 Apr 62.0% 17.2% 5,656,127 5,656,127 May 72.7% 10.7% 3,509,645 3,509,645 June 79.1% 6.5% 2,119,755 2,119,755 July 84.8% 5.7% 1,867,801 1,867,801 Aug 90.59/6 5.7% 1,869,836 1,869,836 Sept Oct 95.1% 4.6% 1,517,914 - - 1,517,914 1,604,819 100.0% 4.9% 1,604,819 Total 1 100.0% 100.0%1 32,834,800 1 5,000,743 1,813,542 34,648,342 oved(under) budget 56.9% 5.52% $9,000,000 Tourist Development Tax Collection Curve $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 �9udge ed Collections $5,000,000 $4,000,000 Actual Collections $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 z° o =° LL i a Month Reported F:\OMB\TDC Revenue\TDC Update Report\2023\TDT Tax Collector Reports\02-TDC Updates December EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a proposal for CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. to continue the required post -construction hardbottom monitoring for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project in summer 2023 for time and materials not to exceed $378,594.35 Tourist Development Tax funds under Contract No. 17-7188 and make a finding that this item promotes tourism (Fund 195, Project No. 90033). OBJECTIVE: To continue to conduct post -construction hardbottom monitoring of Collier County's coast as required by regulatory permits and accept a proposal dated January 20, 2023, to perform biological monitoring in 2023. CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Army Corps of Engineers require nearshore hardbottom monitoring to be performed on a yearly basis to assure that beach renourishment sand has not migrated onto the nearshore coral outcropping off the coast of Collier County. This work is required to be performed during the spring and summer of each year when underwater visibility in the Gulf of Mexico is greatest. Field work must be completed, according to permit, by September 30, 2023. Pending the results of annual inlet monitoring, should dredging be required in areas known to have seagrass habitat, CSA may also be required to perform sub aquatic vegetation surveys during the summer growing season. On May 8, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved contract 17-7188 (Item 16.A.18). On March 24, 2021, both parties mutually agreed to renew the contract for an additional 2 years. On June 17, 2022, both parties mutually agreed to extend the contract for an additional 6 months. On April 12, 2022, the BCC approved a work order for 2022 nearshore hardbottom monitoring with updated pricing. A work order will be released against the master contract identifying specific scope of work, schedule, and pricing for the summer 2023 nearshore hardbottom monitoring. The Work Order for 2023 is for a not to exceed time and material amount of $378,594.35. CSA Ocean Sciences is headquartered in Stuart, Florida and was founded in 1970. They have provided professional services to Collier County since May 2018. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item will be presented to the Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) on February 9, 2023, and the Tourist Development Council (TDC) on February 27, 2023. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. — CMG FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this work is available in the Tourist Development Tax Beach Renourishment Fund (195) project 90033. RECOMMENDATION: To approve a proposal for CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. to continue the required post -construction hardbottom monitoring for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project in summer 2023 for time and materials not to exceed $378,594.35 in Tourist Development Tax funds, under Contract No. 17-7188 and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared By: Andrew Miller, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division 0 14 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Collier County 2023 Nearshore Hardbottom Biological Monitoring and 2023 Doctors Pass and Wiggins Pass Pre -Dredging SAV Surveys Submitted to: Co ter County Collier County Coastal Zone Management Section Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division 2685 South Horseshoe Drive Unit 103 Naples, Florida 34104 Submitted By: f CSA CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 8502 SW Kansas Avenue Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: 772-219-3000 TRACE Q/ pL! SafeGulf CERTIFIED AUTHORIZED PRDVIDER The content of this document is the exclusive property of CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. It has been provided for the purpose for which it is supplied and is not for general release or disclosure. The recipient of this document should take all measures to ensure that the contents are only disclosed to those persons having a legitimate right to know. The recipient should also note that this document is provided on the express terms that it is not to be copied whole or in part or disclosed in any manner to third parties without the express authority in writing from CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. Collier County; Coastal Zone Management Section Andrew Miller, P.E. Director Collier County Coastal Zone Management Tel: 239-252-2966 Andrew.Miller(&colliercountyfl.gov CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. Lystina Kabay Project Scientist Ports, Harbors and Beaches Group Tel: 772-219-3048 1 Cell: 724-316-4225 lkabay(ib conshel£ com CSA Ref. 82025 The following version(s) of this proposal have been issued: Date Description O1 18 November 2022 Collier County 2023 NSHB Biological Monitoring JP FA and Doctors/Wiggins Pass Pre -dredge SAV Surveys 02 21 December 2022 Client -requested revisions LK FA 03 20 January 2023 Client -requested revisions: section titles LK FA 1 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. TABLE OF CONTENTS Tableof Contents........................................................................................................................................ 2 ProposalOverview...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Nearshore Hardbottom Biological Monitoring and Side -Scan Sonar Survey .................................. 4 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Scope of Work............................................................................................................................ 4 Task 1 a: Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization.................................................. 5 Task lb: Field Monitoring Survey..................................................................................................... 5 Task lc: Analysis, Reporting, and Deliverables.................................................................................. 7 Task 1 d: Contingency Field Monitoring Survey................................................................................. 8 Task le: M&E Side -Scan Sonar Survey............................................................................................. 8 1.3 Deliverables................................................................................................................................ 8 1.4 Project Schedule.......................................................................................................................... 9 2.0 Doctors Pass Pre -dredging Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Survey ................................................ 9 2.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Scope of Work.......................................................................................................................... 10 Task 2a: Administration, Travel, Mobilization and Demobilization (Doctors Pass) ......................... 10 Task 2b: Field Survey — Mapping and Qualitative Characterization (Doctors Pass) ......................... 10 Task 2c: Field Survey — Quantitative Survey (Doctors Pass)............................................................ 12 Task 2d: Analysis and Data Deliverables (Doctors Pass).................................................................. 12 2.3 Deliverables.............................................................................................................................. 12 2.4 Project Schedule........................................................................................................................ 12 3.0 Wiggins Pass Pre -dredging Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Survey ............................................. 12 3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Scope of Work.......................................................................................................................... 13 Task 3a: Administration, Travel, Mobilization and Demobilization (Wiggins Pass) ........................ 13 Task 3b: Field Survey — Mapping and Qualitative Characterization (Wiggins Pass) ........................ 13 Task 3c: Field Survey — Quantitative Survey (Wiggins Pass)........................................................... 14 Task 3d: Analysis and Data Deliverables (Wiggins Pass)................................................................. 14 3.3 Deliverables.............................................................................................................................. 14 3.4 Project Schedule........................................................................................................................ 14 4.0 HSSE Overview............................................................................................................................ 14 5.0 Rates, Resources, and Billing Schedule........................................................................................ 15 5.1 Nearshore Hardbottom Biological Monitoring and Side -Scan Sonar Survey ............................ 15 5.2 Doctors Pass Pre -Dredging SAV Survey.................................................................................. 16 5.3 Wiggins Pass Pre -Dredging SAV Survey.................................................................................. 16 2 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 5.4 Proposal Cost Summary............................................................................................................ 27 6.0 Proposal Terms............................................................................................................................. 27 7.0 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................. 29 Attachments.............................................................................................................................................. 31 Attachment A — Labor Rate Schedule..................................................................................................... A-1 Attachment B — Equipment Rate Schedule............................................................................................. B-1 Attachment C — M&E Cost Proposal for Side -Scan Survey.................................................................... C-1 3 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. PROPOSAL OVERVIEW CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. (CSA) is pleased to submit this combined proposal to Collier County for professional environmental monitoring services. The proposal presents the scope of work, level of effort, project schedules, and estimated costs and billing schedule for three efforts: (1) post -construction hardbottom biological monitoring survey for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project and Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project, including the addition of a side -scan sonar (SSS) survey of the project area (Sections 1.0 and 5.1), (2) a pre -construction submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) survey for maintenance dredging of Doctors Pass (Sections 2.0 and 5.2), and (3) a pre - construction SAV survey for maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass (Sections 3.0 and 5.3). While each effort is considered a stand-alone survey and presented as such, a combined proposal cost summary for total estimated costs to Collier County for the 2023 monitoring season is provided in Section 5.4 for convenience. Please note that this combined proposal cost summary for 2023 reflects the addition of two surveys not included in last year's proposal (2022): a SSS survey as part of the annual post -construction nearshore hardbottom biological monitoring survey and a pre -construction SAV survey for the maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass. 1.0 NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND SIDE -SCAN SONAR SURVEY 1.1 INTRODUCTION CSA is submitting this price estimate to conduct post -construction nearshore hardbottom biological monitoring for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project and Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project in summer 2023. This estimate was prepared at the request of Mr. Chris D'Arco, Project Manager, Coastal Zone Management (CZM), for a pending work order from Collier County under Professional Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring, Contract #17-7188, and is based on the scope of work for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Final Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (BMP; Revised 2018). This project will conform to all associated Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permits, which include: Collier County Beach Renourishment FDEP Permit No. 02222355-001-JC and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Permit No. SAJ-2004-08754; Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging FDEP Permit No. 0235740-001-JC and USACE Permit No SAJ-2004-09754; Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement FDEP Permit No. 0142538-001-JC; and USACE Permit No. SAJ-2004-07621. Existing SSS data for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project and Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project area date back to 2009 (CP&E, 2009). Following the observation of several segments of newly documented, exposed hardbottom across the project area in 2022 (CSA, 2022a) and a desire to update this dataset, Collier County CZM Project Manager Mr. Chris D'Arco requested that a SSS survey be conducted for the project area during the upcoming 2023 Nearshore Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Survey. As such, a price estimate and descriptions for this SSS survey are included in the following sections. 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK Tasks la through lc provide costs for mobilization, travel, and field work for a joint CSA/Collier County field team along with the associated project administration, data analysis, and reporting for the nearshore hardbottom biological monitoring survey. Task Id is provided as an optional task in the event that Collier Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. County CZM is unable to staff the field team during optimal conditions in the summer months and a field effort fully staffed by CSA personnel is required. Task le provides the total cost to conduct the SSS survey requested by Mr. D'Arco and is subcontracted to CSA's affiliate, Morgan & Eklund, Inc. (M&E) for this proposal. M&E is a professional hydrographic surveying firm with over 37 years of experience in providing services across the state of Florida. Task ]a: Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization CSA will provide project administration including oversight, coordination, and management of the 2023 nearshore hardbottom monitoring program. CSA's Project Manager will be responsible for supervising all managerial aspects of the project and will have oversight of all team personnel, including field scientists (i.e., subject matter experts), authors, editors, and technical and support staff. CSA will plan and execute project activities to meet required deadlines and/or client needs for the project. CSA will provide a three - person scientific dive team and required equipment; Collier County will provide a vessel and captain to support the survey. CSA will hold a kickoff meeting with Collier County staff to review the scope of work and confirm project logistics prior to beginning mobilization efforts for the monitoring survey. Once a notice to proceed (NTP) has been issued by Collier County, initial mobilization activities will be conducted prior to commencement of field activities. Initial mobilization activities will require approximately 1-week from issuance of the NTP and will include internal Health, Safety, Security, and Environment (HSSE) requirements, a kickoff meeting, equipment and personnel preparation, and coordination with Collier County on acceptable weather and sea state conditions. CSA will mobilize a three -person scientific dive team and required equipment during ideal sea -state and weather windows to perform surveys. Travel to and from Collier County is anticipated to take one half -day each way and includes appropriate per diem according to Class B travel. This task will also include a hotel for the first night in Naples, Florida. CSA will confirm visibility of nearshore waters with Collier County staff prior to mobilization to minimize travel back and forth during monitoring due to poor sea state and water visibility, but several mobilizations and demobilizations may be necessary to complete all tasks depending on weather and sea conditions. Therefore, Tasks lb and lc, collectively, include provision for up to three round trips for the CSA team and associated per diem for the field effort and an additional one round trip for a kick-off meeting for a total of 4 round trips. Additional trips to and from Collier County will be billed on a Time and Materials basis under the agreed upon rates, as needed, with prior approval from Collier County. Task Ib: Field Monitoring Survey CSA will provide three American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS)-certified marine biologists from our Ports and Coastal Sciences group to join the Collier County field team as subject matter experts; they will guide field activities and the data collection processes. A total of 34 permanent monitoring transects (50-m length) established in 2006 by Coastal Planning and Engineering (CP&E) during the original baseline pre -construction survey and those installed in 2018 for the Wiggins Pass nearshore hardbottom monitoring will be re -surveyed in 2023. The transects are located among five beach segments: Wiggins Pass, three transects (R-18+900, R-19+400, and R-20); Vanderbilt, seven transects (R-21+080 to R-29+700); Pelican Bay, six transects (R-31+480 to R-38+380); Park Shore, nine transects (R-43+550 to R-55); and Naples Beach, nine transects (R-58+300 to R-65) (Figure 1). The transect endpoints supplied by Collier County as listed in Table 1 of the BMP (FDEP, 2018) will be utilized to re -survey all transects. Each transect will be re -occupied by extending a 50-m tape along the transect length and aligning it with permanent markers installed on the seafloor and maintained during previous monitoring surveys. Impacts to permanent transect markers are expected due Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. to the effects of Hurricane Ian, which made landfall near the project area as a Category 4 storm in September 2022 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA], 2022). As such, the field team will take care to perform transect maintenance as needed during the 2023 field survey. Figure 1. Collier County Beach Nourishment and Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging Project areas located along the coastline near Naples, Florida. FDEP = Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Transect Monitorin Along each 50-m transect, the team will conduct line -intercept and interval sediment depth measurements, survey 11 benthic quadrats, collect coral photo quadrats, and conduct a coral census as described in the BMP. Quantitative video of each transect will be recorded at 40-cm height off the bottom at a slow 4 in min_l speed for archival purposes. A high definition (HD) video camera with video lights and two lasers mounted to converge at a point 40 cm from the camera will be used to ensure that divers maintain the appropriate height off the bottom. Sediment depth measurements will be made at 1-m intervals along the entire length of the transect with a marked stainless -steel ruler inserted up to 30 cm into the sediment. A delineation of hardbottom and sand cover will be made by meter of coverage along the transect, and the maximum height of hardbottom at the start of each transect will be recorded. A 0.5 in x 0.5 in quadrat (0.25 mz area) will be sampled at 11 individual hardbottom locations spaced every 5 in along the transect in the same locations as those established and surveyed during the pre -construction monitoring survey. Quadrats containing 100% sand (due to cover by sand) will be surveyed and included in the dataset. Within each quadrat, percent cover by major benthic taxonomic groups including macroalgae (total percent cover of the dominant species), coralline algae, turf algae, sponges, hydroids, wormrock, octocorals, stony corals, bryozoans, and tunicates will be visually estimated, as well as percent cover of various abiotic substrate types. Maximum height of the thalli will be measured for the two dominant macroalgae species in each quadrat and averaged. Within each quadrat, sediment depth will be measured at five haphazardly selected positions and the maximum vertical relief of hardbottom will be measured. Still digital photographs of each quadrat will be collected at the time of survey. Nearshore Hardbottom Edue Survevs The nearshore hardbottom edge (landward edge of hardbottom) seaward of the equilibrium -toe -of -fill (ETOF) of each beach segment will be mapped during the survey. Two divers will swim the nearshore hardbottom edge located immediately west of the ETOF, recording video of the edge and associated benthic community. The team will tow a buoy equipped with radio telemetry and a differential global positioning system (DGPS) antenna, which wirelessly transmits continuous buoy/diver positions to Hypack® hydrographic survey software on board the vessel. The HD video camera will be held at an oblique angle and filming will occur simultaneously with the DGPS buoy to allow geo-referencing. If the continuous nearshore hardbottom edge crosses east of the ETOF toward land, mapping will continue until the edge of hardbottom ends. Task Ic: Analysis, Reporting, and Deliverables Data deliverables and reports will be provided to Collier County and FDEP, with conformance to requirements and schedules set forth in the 2018-approved BMP. A comprehensive raw data deliverable will be provided on an external hard drive within 270 days of NTP issuance date and will include all video and photo data, Excel spreadsheets of quadrat data, draft GIS shapefiles, and *.pdf copies of field data sheets, as applicable. Notification of survey completion will be made by letter or email to the FDEP Joint Coastal Permit Compliance Officer. As per Contract #17-7188, nearshore hardbottom monitoring results will be compiled into a report within 270 days of NTP issuance. The report will discuss the results of the 2023 Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Survey and include comparisons with annual monitoring survey results from the 2018 (CSA, 2019a), 2019 (CSA, 2019b), 2020 (CSA, 2020), 2021 (CSA, 2022a), and 2022 (CSA, 2022b) nearshore 7 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. hardbottom monitoring reports. The 2023 monitoring report will include graphs, tables, and statistical analyses of collected data. Geo-referenced maps showing hardbottom along transects and the nearshore hardbottom edge will be included. All reports will be provided in electronic format with a hardcopy upon request. Task Id. Contingency Field Monitoring Survey Task Id, consisting of CSA vessel, operator, and four scientific divers, is also included in this cost estimate as an option for contingency. Tasks la through lc assume that the required four -person dive team will consist of three CSA AAUS divers/marine biologists and one Collier County CZM diver working from a Collier County vessel with a Collier County vessel operator. In the event that survey conditions are favorable and Collier County divers or vessel operator are unable to participate in the survey, CSA will provide additional scientific divers and a suitable survey vessel and operator, as necessary. This task comprises of a full CSA dive team including four divers, one vessel operator, CSA vessel, and all necessary equipment normally provided by Collier County, as well as travel to and from Collier County. Task le: M&E Side -Scan Sonar Survey Task le, subcontracted to M&E, is included in this cost estimate at the request of Mr. D'Arco. M&E will perform a nearshore SSS survey to map exposed hardbottom within the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project running north and south from FDEP R monuments R-18 and R-79 and extending approximately 350 in from the shoreline (Figure 1). CSA will work closely with M&E to utilize SSS survey results to aid the in situ diver -led nearshore hardbottom mapping effort as required by FDEP (Task lc). 1.3 DELIVERABLES Raw data deliverables listed below will be submitted within 45 days of completion of the survey as required by FDEP: • All video and photo data; • Excel spreadsheets of quadrat data; • Draft GIS shapefiles: pipeline corridors, nearshore hardbottom edge, and transects; and • *.pdf copies of field data sheets. Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Survey Report and deliverables listed below will be submitted within 90 days of completion of survey as required by FDEP: • Graphs, tables, statistical analyses, and results/discussion of collected data; • Geo-referenced maps showing hardbottom along transects and the nearshore hardbottom edge; • Selected qualitative imagery of transects and nearshore hardbottom edge; and • Provided in electronic format, pdf, with hardcopy on request. Results of the SSS survey will be delivered in the form of a SS mosaic and .pdf drawing mapping exposed hardbottom habitat in the project area. Deliverables will be submitted directly to Collier County within 90 days of the completion of the survey. Note that all project related tasks will be completed within 270 days of the NTP from Collier County. Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 1.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE Within 7 days of receiving the NTP from Collier County and weather permitting, CSA and M&E will mobilize the necessary equipment and travel to Naples, Florida the afternoon prior to the field surveys. The surveys will be conducted between 1 May and 30 September 2023 with the final report of the nearshore hardbottom biological monitoring, the SSS mosaic and drawing, and the conclusion of all related work within 270 days of NTP. All raw data deliverables will be compiled and delivered to FDEP within 45 days of the completion of field work with the final report to follow no later than 90 days from the completion of the nearshore hardbottom biological monitoring. Deliverables for the SSS survey will be compiled and delivered to Collier County within 90 days of the completion of the Survey. The project schedule will be updated twice per month (bi-weekly) by the Project Manager with input from Collier County and FDEP (as appropriate) to provide the status of task activities and track critical milestones and precedent activities. This bi-weekly update will identify any problems early and enable corrective action to be taken quickly. The updated schedule may be provided to Collier County on request. CSA will convene a project kickoff meeting with Collier County staff and field survey participants to ensure that all necessary personnel, field equipment, and monitoring standard operating procedures are in place prior to initiation of the survey. To minimize mobilization and travel costs, CSA will endeavor to conduct the monitoring survey in its entirety as weather permits. 2.0 DOCTORS PASS PRE -DREDGING SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION SURVEY 2.1 INTRODUCTION Maintenance dredging of Doctors Pass, located in Collier County, Florida, is authorized under FDEP Permit No. 0331817-0044JM. To fulfill the monitoring requirements for Specific Condition 1.i. of the Permit, pre- and post -construction SAV surveys are required in accordance with the approved Seagrass BMP (Chicago Bridge and Iron [CB&I], 2015) and with special consideration for the recently distributed FDEP Guidance on Surveys for Potential Impacts to SAV, dated 08 December 2020. The plan calls for the monitoring of all SAV resources within the influence of the project area before and after construction. This proposal focuses survey activities in Moorings Bay only; SAV has previously only been observed in lower Moorings Bay immediately north of the Inlet at Doctors Pass, where the tidal flood shoal forms. The maintenance dredging project is designed to remove approximately 45,000 cubic yards of sand from the navigational channels in Doctors Pass and place the dredged material in a nearshore area south of the inlet (R-58A -457 ft to R-58 +500 ft) and at Lowdermilk Park (R-60 to R 61 +816 ft). SAV patches were delineated in the dredge footprint and in the adjacent mixing zone within Moorings Bay during previous resource surveys in 2018 (CSA, 2018a,b). The dredge template has been previously permitted and dredged repeatedly. FDEP does not require mitigation or monitoring for direct impacts to SAV resources located within the previously permitted dredge footprint; however, maintenance dredging may result in secondary impacts to SAV resources within the adjacent mixing zone, including sedimentation and sediment sloughing. To determine potential secondary impacts to SAV from Doctors Pass maintenance dredging, pre- and post - construction, biological monitoring of SAV located within the mixing zone (400 ft buffer from the dredge area) is required. This pre -construction survey will determine the geographic extent, composition, and density of SAV within the project area. Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This proposal provides the scope of work and updated level of effort for a potential 2023 pre -construction SAV survey for Doctors Pass maintenance dredging. 2.2 SCOPE OF WORK The following monitoring tasks will be completed in the areas of SAV within the mixing zone of the Doctors Pass dredge template in Moorings Bay (Figure 2). FDEP will be notified when the survey will begin and when it is completed, which will take place during the SAV growing season (prior to 30 September 2023), as required in the Seagrass BMP. Task 2a: Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization (Doctors Pass) All project management, HSSE duties and requirements, internal kickoff meeting, and a single mobilization/demobilization of CSA equipment and personnel to and from our headquarters in Stuart, Florida are included in this task. This task will also include hotel and per diem for the first night in Naples, Florida. Task 2b: Field Survey — Mapping and Qualitative Characterization (Doctors Pass) This task includes labor for three CSA AAUS divers in the field and data analysis activities described below, equipment, hotel, and per diem. This proposal assumes that Collier County will provide the vessel and operator to augment the CSA survey team. In situ SAV Delineation and Oualitative Assessment Divers (or snorkelers) will visually locate the edge of the SAV patches and follow the edge of the community while towing a buoy equipped with radio telemetry and a DGPS antenna linked to a topside laptop computer running HYPACK navigational software. Positioning data will be recorded to determine the total acreage of SAV within the mixing zone. During SAV delineation, biologists will visually assess species composition, above -ground biomass, epiphyte coverage, and overall condition of each SAV patch within the mixing zone survey area. In situ Delineation Acreage Analvsis Diver track lines recorded during the in situ SAV delineation will be assessed for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) by a CSA GIS analyst and the total acreage of each SAV patch observed will be extrapolated and reported to the field team prior to the commencement of the quantitative survey. These data will determine the level of effort for the quantitative survey based on the requirements of the Seagrass BMP. 10 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Figure 2. Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging area project overview. FDEP = Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 11 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Task 2c: Field Survey — Quantitative Survey (Doctors Pass) To characterize the cover of SAV within the project area, biologists will document the Braun-Blanquet (BB) cover -abundance scores for SAV within haphazardly placed 0.25 m2 (0.5 m X 0.5 m) to 1.0 m2 (1.0 m X 1.0 m) quadrats within each SAV patch. As per the Seagrass BMP requirements, the number and size of quadrats per SAV patch will be determined based on the total acreage of each patch from the in situ SAV delineation conducted in Task 2b and will reflect 10% of the total area (acreage) if less than 1 acre. Quadrat placement will not be biased (e.g., towards the center of the patches or densest areas) but will be distributed throughout the patch to characterize the cover. A percent cover score will be reported for each SAV taxa present within the quadrats. Additionally, the total cover of all SAV taxa present within the quadrats will be reported. This task includes labor for three CSA AAUS divers, equipment, hotel, and per diem. This proposal assumes that Collier County will provide the vessel and operator to augment the CSA survey team. Task 2d: Analysis and Data Deliverables (Doctors Pass) This task includes QA/QC of all data collected, areal calculations of seagrass coverage, and preparation of the data deliverable as per the Seagrass BMP. The data deliverable will be submitted to FDEP within 45 days of completion of the survey. 2.3 DELIVERABLES Raw data deliverables listed below will be submitted within 45 days of completion of survey as required by FDEP: • All video and photo data; • Excel spreadsheets of SAV survey data; • Draft GIS shapefiles: SAV patch delineation and areas of interest; and • *.pdf copies of field data sheets. Note that all project related tasks will be completed within 270 days of the NTP from Collier County. 2.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE The survey will be completed during the SAV growing season, i.e., prior to 30 September 2023. Within 7 days of receiving the Purchase Order from Collier County and weather permitting, CSA will mobilize the necessary equipment and travel to Naples, Florida the afternoon prior to the field survey. Daily updates of survey progress will be provided to Collier County and contact with FDEP will be maintained to assure compliance with permitting based on field observations. Upon return, raw data and deliverables will be compiled for submittal to FDEP no later than 45 days following the survey. All project related tasks will be completed within 270 days of the NTP from Collier County. 3.0 WIGGINS PASS PRE -DREDGING SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION SURVEY 3.1 INTRODUCTION Maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass, located in Collier County, Florida, is authorized under FDEP Permit No. 0142538-0084C. To fulfill the monitoring requirements the Permit, pre- and post -construction SAV surveys are required with special consideration for the recently distributed FDEP Guidance on Surveys for Potential Impacts to SAV, dated 08 December 2020. The plan calls for the monitoring of all 12 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. SAV resources within the influence of the project area before and after construction. This proposal focuses survey activities in the Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel only; SAV has previously been observed on the east and west side of the Water Turkey Bay Channel from Wiggins Pass and into Water Turkey Bay (Earth Tech Environmental, 2020). To determine potential impacts to SAV from Wiggins Pass maintenance dredging, pre- and post - construction, biological monitoring of SAV located within the mixing zone (400 ft buffer from the dredge area) is required. This pre -construction survey will determine the geographic extent, composition, and density of SAV within the project area. This proposal provides the scope of work and updated level of effort for a potential 2023 pre -construction SAV Survey for Wiggins Pass maintenance dredging. 3.2 SCOPE OF WORK The following monitoring tasks will be completed in the areas of SAV within Wiggins Pass, as requested by Mr. D'Arco. FDEP will be notified when the survey will begin and when it is completed, which will take place during the SAV growing season (prior to 30 September 2023), as required in the Seagrass BMP. Task 3a: Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization (Wiggins Pass) All project management, HSSE duties and requirements, internal kickoff meeting, and a single mobilization/demobilization of CSA equipment and personnel to and from our headquarters in Stuart, Florida are included in this task. This task will also include hotel and per diem for the first night in Naples, Florida. Task 3b: Field Survey — Mapping and Qualitative Characterization (Wiggins Pass) This task includes labor for three CSA AAUS divers in the field and data analysis activities described below, equipment, hotel, and per diem. This proposal assumes that Collier County will provide the vessel and operator to augment the CSA survey team. In situ SAV Delineation and Qualitative Assessment Divers (or snorkelers) will visually locate the edge of the SAV patches and follow the edge of the community while towing a buoy equipped with radio telemetry and a DGPS antenna linked to a topside laptop computer running HYPACK navigational software. The positioning data will be recorded to determine the total acreage of SAV within the navigation channel. During SAV delineation, biologists will visually assess species composition, above -ground biomass, epiphyte coverage, and overall condition of each SAV patch within the navigation channel. In situ Delineation Acreaee Analvsis Diver track lines recorded during the in situ SAV delineation will be assessed for QA/QC by a CSA GIS analyst and the total acreage of each SAV patch observed will be extrapolated and reported to the field team prior to the commencement of the quantitative survey. These data will determine the level of effort for the quantitative survey based on the requirements of the Seagrass BMP. 13 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Task 3c: Field Survey — Quantitative Survey (Wiggins Pass) To characterize the cover of SAV within the project area, biologists will document the BB cover - abundance scores for SAV within haphazardly placed 0.25 m2 (0.5 m X 0.5 m) to 1.0 m2 (1.0 in X 1.0 m) quadrats within each SAV patch. As per the Seagrass BMP requirements, the number and size of quadrats per SAV patch will be determined based on the total acreage of each patch from the in situ SAV delineation conducted in Task 3b and will reflect 10% of the total area (acreage) if less than 1 acre. Quadrat placement will not be biased (e.g., towards the center of the patches or densest areas) but will be distributed throughout the patch to characterize the cover. A percent cover score will be reported for each SAV taxa present within quadrats. Additionally, the total cover of all SAV taxa present within the quadrats will be reported. This task includes labor for three CSA AAUS divers, equipment, hotel, and per diem. This proposal assumes that Collier County will provide the vessel and operator to augment the CSA survey team. Task 3d. Analysis and Data Deliverables (Wiggins Pass) This task includes QA/QC of all data collected, areal calculations of seagrass coverage, and preparation of the data deliverable as per the Seagrass BMP. The data deliverable will be submitted to FDEP within 45 days of completion of the survey. 3.3 DELIVERABLES Raw data deliverables listed below will be submitted within 45 days of completion of survey as required by FDEP: • All video and photo data; • Excel spreadsheets of SAV survey data; • Draft GIS shapefiles: SAV patch delineation and areas of interest; and • *.pdf copies of field data sheets. Note that all project related tasks will be completed within 270 days of the NTP from Collier County. 3.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE The survey will be completed during the SAV growing season, i.e., prior to 30 September 2023. Within 7 days of receiving the Purchase Order from Collier County and weather permitting, CSA will mobilize the necessary equipment and travel to Naples, Florida the afternoon prior to the field survey. Daily updates of survey progress will be provided to Collier County and contact with FDEP will be maintained to assure compliance with permitting based on field observations. Upon return, raw data and deliverables will be compiled for submittal to FDEP no later than 45 days following the survey. All project related tasks will be completed within 270 days of the NTP from Collier County. 4.0 HSSE OVERVIEW As a leading international marine environmental consulting firm, CSA attaches great importance to its HSSE Management System to protect human health, avoid and prevent incidents and injuries, and minimize impacts to the environment. CSA emphasizes the importance of HSSE for every activity and provides the resources, knowledge, and training necessary for staff to meet HSSE objectives, including Stop Work Authority for all staff if a safety uncertainty arises. CSA's commitment to safety is reflected in 14 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. the daily activities of its personnel as well as the personal involvement from management in support of the HSSE Management System. America`$ In recognition of this commitment to safety, CSA was the recipient of the prestigious tr !�1 CEST "America's Safest Companies Award" by EHS Today magazine (November 2019). a7 / r This corporate award honors companies that clearly demonstrate their commitment to employee safety and health, environmental management, and risk control and have been deemed America's Safest. To be considered one of America's Safest Companies, a company must demonstrate transformational EHS leadership in the form of support from management and employee involvement; innovative solutions to safety challenges; injury and illness rates significantly lower than the average for their industry; comprehensive training programs; evidence that prevention of incidents is the cornerstone of the safety process; excellent communication internally and externally about the value of safety; and a way to substantiate the benefits of the safety process. UNIVERSITY OF CSA is also a recipient of the "Sunshine State Safety Recognition Award" SOUTH FLORIDA from the University of South Florida for employee and management emphasis on safety (March 2017). The Sunshine State Safety Recognition Award serves as validation of a company's achievements and track record. OPEC�if CSA is committed to achieving standards, including: AUTHORIZED PROVIDER • Maintaining PEC Safety SafeGulf, SafeLandUSA, and H2S Clear certifications, and provides trained, professional safety personnel for offshore environmental monitoring and marine activities; • Organizational Member of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) and the Scientific Boating Safety Association (SBSA); • Utilizes a Safety and Environmental Management System (SEMS) approach to safety program administration; • CSA is implementing ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018 conformance standards; • CSA's HSSE Manager is ISO 90001:2015 Lead Auditor Certified and a PEC Learn SafeGulFSafeLand/H2S Certified Instructor; • ISNetworld Member Contractor for environmental consulting; • DISA Member; and • Low rolling Total Recordable Incident Rate of 0.0 and Experience Modifier Rate of 0.83. 5.0 RATES, RESOURCES, AND BILLING SCHEDULE 5.1 NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND SIDE -SCAN SONAR SURVEY CSA has built in conservative estimates for level of effort to decrease the likelihood of change orders or additional approvals from Collier County, and, utilizing best management practices, we anticipate being able to complete the below tasks within or under the costs provided. The project costs listed in Table 1 by task are on a Time and Materials (T&M) Not -to -Exceed basis and will be billed monthly once NTP is given for the nearshore hardbottom biological monitoring survey. The labor and equipment rates are based on the Professional Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Contract #17-7188 between CSA and Collier County in April 2018 (renewal issued March 2021). CSR's 2023 labor and equipment rate schedules are also provided in Attachments A and B, respectively, and reflect that rates that were provided to Collier County in 2021 as agreed upon in the contract renewal. Costs for the SSS survey will be billed upon completion for the total amount listed in Table 1. A breakdown of costs to complete the SSS are included in the proposal provided to CSA by M&E, which is provided in Attachment C. 15 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 5.2 DOCTORS PASS PRE -DREDGING SAV SURVEY Table 2 provides the T&M rates and estimated level of effort a stand-alone SAV survey that meets the new Guidance on Surveys for Potential Impacts to SAV (FDEP, 2020). Costs incurred will be billed at completion of the survey. If possible, CSA's project manager will work closely with the Collier County CZM project manager to combine travel and mobilization costs with the Nearshore Hardbottom monitoring, which is anticipated to be conducted concurrently. Additionally, every effort will be made to discuss the level of effort required for the quantitative survey with FDEP representatives prior to the field effort, which may result in a decreased number of days. The labor and equipment rates found in Table 2 are based on the Professional Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Contract #17-7188 between CSA and Collier County, April 2018 (renewal issued March 2021). CSA's 2023 labor and equipment rate schedules are also provided in Attachments A and B, respectively, and reflect rates that were provided to Collier County in 2021 as agreed upon in the contract renewal. 5.3 WIGGINS PASS PRE -DREDGING SAV SURVEY Table 3 provides the T&M rates and estimated level of effort a stand-alone SAV Survey in Wiggins Pass, Collier County, that meets the new Guidance on Surveys for Potential Impacts to SAV (FDEP, 2020). Costs incurred will be billed at completion of the Survey. If possible, CSA's project manager will work closely with the Collier County CZM project manager to combine travel and mobilization costs with the Nearshore Hardbottom monitoring, which is anticipated to be conducted concurrently. Additionally, every effort will be made to discuss the level of effort required for the quantitative survey with FDEP representatives prior to the field effort, which may result in a decreased number of days. The labor and equipment rates found in Table 3 are based on the Professional Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Contract #17-7188 between CSA and Collier County, April 2018 (renewal issued March 2021). CSA's 2023 labor and equipment rate schedules are also provided in Attachments A and B, respectively, and reflect rates that were provided to Collier County in 2021 as agreed upon in the contract renewal. 16 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Table 1. Estimated Cost breakdown of CSA hours, survey days, and travel by task for the Nearshore Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Survey. Task la DescriptionProject (USD) Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization $ 3Q491.25 Labor $ 25,320.39 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 96 $ 146.80 $ 14,092.80 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hour 42 $ 111.57 $ 4,685.94 PSI Standby Diver Hour 42 $ 99.83 $ 4,192.86 PM2 Hour 4 $ 184.97 $ 739.88 APM Hour 6 $ 82.21 $ 493.26 OM Hour 1 $ 202.59 $ 202.59 GISD Hour 2 $ 129.18 $ 258.36 SS1 Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 T1 Hour 4 $ 67.52 $ 270.08 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 Travel $ 3,460.86 Vehicle Rental Day (3 mob/3 dmob/ 1 meeting) 7 $ 180.00 $ 1,260.00 Fuel Gallon (4 round trips) 84 $ 5.04 $ 423.36 Lodging (arrival only) 3 persons x 3 nights 9 $ 136.50 $ 1,228.50 Meals Mobilization (lunch and dinner per diem) 3 persons x 3 days 9 $ 17.00 $ 153.00 Meals Demobilization (full day per diem) 3 persons x 3 days 9 $ 36.00 $ 324.00 Meals Kick-off Meeting (full day per diem) 2 persons x 1 days 2 $ 36.00 $ 72.00 Equipment $ 1,710.00 Diver GoPro Camera System (2 x 6 days) Day 12 $ 35.00 $ 420.00 3 mobilization Diver Digital Still Camera System (2 x 6 days) Day 12 $ 55.00 $ 660.00 and 3 demobilization Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 6 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 events Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 6 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 6 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 6 $ 30.00 $ 180.00 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Project Task lb Description Field Monitoring Survey Rates (USD) Total $ 137,990.74 Labor $ 112,210.54 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 312 $ 146.80 $ 45,801.60 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hour 312 $ 111.57 $ 34,809.84 PSI Standby Diver Hour 312 $ 99.83 $ 31,146.96 SS1 Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 Tl Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 Travel $ 18,790.20 Vehicle Rental Day 26 $ 180.00 $ 4,680.00 Fuel - Vehicle Gallon 130 $ 5.04 $ 655.20 Lodging 3 rooms x 26 nights 78 $ 136.50 $ 10,647.00 Meals (per diem) 3 persons x 26 days 78 $ 36.00 $ 2,808.00 Equipment $ 6,990.00 Diver GoPro Camera System (2 x 26 days) Day 52 $ 35.00 $ 1,820.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System (2 x 26 days) Day 52 $ 55.00 $ 2,860.00 Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 26 $ 25.00 $ 650.00 Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 26 $ 25.00 $ 650.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 26 $ 25.00 $ 650.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 12 $ 30.00 $ 360.00 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Project Task lc Description Analysis, Reporting, and Deliverables Rates 1 i $ 51,969.24 Labor $ 51,736.14 sSl Hour 46 $ 182.03 $ 8,373.38 PS3 Hour 20 $ 146.80 $ 2,936.00 PS2 Hour 206 $ 111.57 $ 22,983.42 PSI Hour 96 $ 99.83 $ 9,583.68 Tl Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 GISD Hour 16 $ 129.18 $ 2,066.88 GISA Hour 24 $ 96.88 $ 2,325.12 OM Hour 1 $ 202.59 $ 202.59 TEl Hour 12 $ 91.02 $ 1,092.24 DP Hour 24 $ 79.28 $ 1,902.72 Reimbursables $ 233.10 Digital Media Each 2 $ 78.75 $ 157.50 FedEx Each 2 $ 37.80 $ 75.60 Id 111VCo.ti.gency Field Monitoring Survey - 4 CSA Divers, Vessel, & Operator $ 32,343.74 Labor $ 24,321.74 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 45 $ 146.80 $ 6,606.00 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hour 45 $ 111.57 $ 5,020.65 PSI (Diver 3) - Field Team Hour 45 $ 99.83 $ 4,492.35 Tl Standby Diver Hour 45 $ 67.52 $ 3,038.40 T3 Vessel Operator Hour 45 $ 108.63 $ 4,888.35 SSI Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 Travel $ 3,618.00 Fuel - Truck Gallon 54 $ 5.00 $ 270.00 Fuel - Vessel Gallon 90 $ 6.00 $ 540.00 Dockage Day 3 $ 73.50 $ 220.50 Lodging 5 rooms x 3 nights 15 $ 136.50 $ 2,047.50 Meals (per diem) 5 persons x 3 days 15 $ 36.00 $ 540.00 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Project Tash Equipment Description 1 $ 4,404.00 25 ft Parker Boat w/Trailer Day 3 $ 550.00 $ 1,650.00 Truck (2 x 3 days) Day 6 $ 150.00 $ 900.00 Diver GOPro Camera System (2 x 3 days) Day 6 $ 35.00 $ 210.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System (2 x 3 days) Day 6 $ 55.00 $ 330.00 Survey Software Day 3 $ 110.00 $ 330.00 Computer Day 3 $ 70.00 $ 210.00 Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 3 $ 25.00 $ 75.00 Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 3 $ 25.00 $ 75.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 3 $ 25.00 $ 75.00 Scuba Equipment Set 4 Day 3 $ 25.00 $ 75.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 3 $ 30.00 $ 90.00 Scuba Tanks 80 cubic ft 16 tanks x 3 days 48 $ 8.00 $ 384.00 le M&E Side -Scan Sonar Survey $ 53,418.38 Cost proposal to CSA from M&E $ 50,874.65 Survey + 5% for subcontractor (see rates agreement in Attachment A $ 2,543.73 Field Survey Vessel, Equipment, and Staff (for a breakdown of costs see Attachment C Includes Survey Deliverables (side -scan sonar mosaic and .pdf drawing) TOTAL $ 306,213.35 20 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Table 2. Estimated Cost breakdown of CSA hours, survey days, and travel by task for the Doctors Pass Pre -Dredging Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Survey and Data Deliverable. Project Task 2a Description Unit Qty Rates (USD) Sub -Total Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization (Doctors Pass) Total $ 5,994.48 Labor $ 4,498.02 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 8 $ 146.80 $ 1,174.40 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hour 11 $ 111.57 $ 1,227.27 PSI Standby Diver Hour 8 $ 99.83 $ 798.64 SSl Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 T1 Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 OM Hour 2 $ 202.59 $ 405.18 GISA Hour 2 $ 96.88 $ 193.76 APM Hour 3 $ 82.21 $ 246.63 Travel $ 1,106.46 Vehicle Rental Day 2 $ 180.00 $ 360.00 Lodging (arrival only) 3 rooms x 1 night 3 $ 136.50 $ 409.50 Meals (per diem) 3 persons x 2 days 6 $ 36.00 $ 216.00 Fuel - Vehicle Day 2 $ 60.48 $ 120.96 Equipment $ 390.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System Day 2 $ 55.00 $ 110.00 1 mobilization Diver GoPro Camera System Day 2 $ 35.00 $ 70.00 and I Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 demobilization event Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 2 $ 30.00 $ 60.00 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Project Task 2b Description 1 Field Survey -Mapping and Qualitative Characterization (Doctors Pass) $ 5,678.74 Labor $ 4,750.54 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 12 $ 146.80 $ 1,761.60 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team How 12 $ 111.57 $ 1,338.84 PSI Standby Diver Hour 12 $ 99.83 $ 1,197.96 SS1 Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 T1 Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 Travel $ 733.20 Vehicle Rental Day 1 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 Lodging 3 rooms x 1 night 3 $ 136.50 $ 409.50 Meals (per diem) 3 persons x 1 days 3 $ 36.00 $ 108.00 Fuel - Vehicle Day 1 $ 35.70 $ 35.70 Equipment $ 195.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System Day 1 $ 55.00 $ 55.00 Diver GoPro Camera System Day 1 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 1 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 1 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 1 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 1 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 2c Field Survey - Quantitative Survey (Doctors Pass) $ 219358.54 Labor $ 17,645.74 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 48 $ 146.80 $ 7,046.40 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hour 48 $ 111.57 $ 5,355.36 PSI Standby Diver Hour 48 $ 99.83 $ 4,791.84 SSl Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 Tl Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 22 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Task Travel Description 7QtY $ 2,932.80 Vehicle Rental Day 4 $ 180.00 $ 720.00 Lodging 3 rooms x 4 night 12 $ 136.50 $ 1,638.00 Meals (per diem) 3 persons x 4 days 12 $ 36.00 $ 432.00 Fuel - Vehicle Day 4 $ 35.70 $ 142.80 Equipment $ 780.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System Day 4 $ 55.00 $ 220.00 Diver GoPro Camera System Day 4 $ 35.00 $ 140.00 Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 4 $ 25.00 $ 100.00 Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 4 $ 25.00 $ 100.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 4 $ 25.00 $ 100.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 4 $ 30.00 $ 120.00 Analysis and Data Deliverables oc ars ass) $ 9,424.70 Labor $ 9,424.70 SSl Hour 4 $ 182.03 $ 728.12 PS2 Hour 34 $ 111.57 $ 3,793.38 PSI Hour 32 $ 99.83 $ 3,194.56 Tl Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 GISA Hour 14 $ 96.88 $ 1,356.32 APM Hour 1 $ 82.21 $ 82.21 TOTAL $ 42,456.46 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Table 3. Estimated Cost breakdown of CSA hours, survey days, and travel by task for the Wiggins Pass Pre -Dredging Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Survey and Data Deliverable. Project Task 3a Description Unit Qty Rates (USD) Sub -Total Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization (Wiggins Pass) Total $ 5,994.48 Labor $ 4,498.02 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 8 $ 146.80 $ 1,174.40 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hour 11 $ 111.57 $ 1,227.27 PSI Standby Diver Hour 8 $ 99.83 $ 798.64 SS1 Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 Tl Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 OM Hour 2 $ 202.59 $ 405.18 GISA Hour 2 $ 96.88 $ 193.76 APM Hour 3 $ 82.21 $ 246.63 Travel $ 1,106.46 Vehicle Rental Day 2 $ 180.00 $ 360.00 Lodging (arrival only) 3 rooms x 1 night 3 $ 136.50 $ 409.50 Meals (per diem) 3 persons x 2 days 6 $ 36.00 $ 216.00 Fuel - Vehicle Day 2 $ 60.48 $ 120.96 Equipment $ 390.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System Day 2 $ 55.00 $ 110.00 1 mobilization Diver GoPro Camera System Day 2 $ 35.00 $ 70.00 and 1 Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 demobilization Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 event Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 2 $ 30.00 $ 60.00 24 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Project Task 3b Description 1 Field Survey - Mapping and Qualitative Characterization (Wiggins Pass) $ 5,678.74 Labor 7 $ 4,750.54 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 12 $ 146.80 $ 1,761.60 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hoar 12 $ 111.57 $ 1,338.84 PSI Standby Diver Hour 12 $ 99.83 $ 1,197.96 SS1 Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 Tl Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hoar 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 Travel $ 733.20 Vehicle Rental Day 1 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 Lodging 3 rooms x 1 night 3 $ 136.50 $ 409.50 Meals (per diem) 3 persons x 1 days 3 $ 36.00 $ 108.00 Fuel - Vehicle Day 1 $ 35.70 $ 35.70 Equipment $ 195.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System Day 1 $ 55.00 $ 55.00 Diver GoPro Camera System Day 1 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 1 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 1 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 1 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 1 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 3c Field Survey - Quantitative Survey (Wiggins Pass)-d 10,905.34 Labor $ 9,048.94 PS3 (Diver 1) - Field Team Hour 24 $ 146.80 $ 3,523.20 PS2 (Diver 2) - Field Team Hour 24 $ 111.57 $ 2,677.68 PSI Standby Diver Hoar 24 $ 99.83 $ 2,395.92 SS1 Hour 1 $ 182.03 $ 182.03 Tl Hoar 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hoar 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Task Description Travel 1 $ 1,466.40 Vehicle Rental Day 2 $ 180.00 $ 360.00 Lodging 3 rooms x 2 night 6 $ 136.50 $ 819.00 Meals (per diem) 3 persons x 2 days 6 $ 36.00 $ 216.00 im Fuel - Vehicle Day 2 $ 35.70 $ 71.40 Equipment $ 390.00 Diver Digital Still Camera System Day 2 $ 55.00 $ 110.00 Diver GoPro Camera System Day 2 $ 35.00 $ 70.00 Scuba Equipment Set 1 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 Scuba Equipment Set 2 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 Scuba Equipment Set 3 Day 2 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 Telemetry Survey System Day 2 $ 30.00 $ 60.00 3d Analysis and Data Deliverables (Wiggins Pass) $ 7,345.98 Labor $ 7,345.98 SS1 Hour 4 $ 182.03 $ 728.12 PS2 Hoar 26 $ 111.57 $ 2,900.82 PSI Hoar 24 $ 99.83 $ 2,395.92 Tl Hour 1 $ 67.52 $ 67.52 T2 Hour 1 $ 93.96 $ 93.96 T3 Hour 1 $ 108.63 $ 108.63 GISA Hour 10 $ 96.88 $ 968.80 APM Hour 1 $ 82.21 $ 82.21 TOTAL $ 29,924.54 26 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 5.4 PROPOSAL COST SUMMARY The total proposed cost for the Nearshore Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Survey (including the side - scan sonar survey) is estimated to be $306,213.35; the proposed cost for the Doctors Pass Pre -Dredging SAV Survey is estimated to be $42,456.46; and the proposed cost for the Wiggins Pass Pre -Dredging SAV Survey is estimated to be $29,924.54. This results in a combined proposal cost of $378,594.35. All estimated costs reflect a T&M level of effort and actual costs charged will be based on the actual number of field days spent by CSA personnel reflecting rates for labor and equipment listed in Attachments A and B, with the exception of costs provided for the SSS survey. Pricing provided for this survey includes a total cost to complete a stand-alone survey and provide deliverables listed in Sections 1.2 and 1.3. A breakdown of these costs provided by the subcontractor, M&E, is provided in Attachment C. 6.0 PROPOSAL TERMS CSA's commercial proposal price calculations were based upon our professional services contract with Collier County as well as "Project -Specific Terms," which are outlined below. If Collier County (Client) has issues with any of these items, CSA reserves the right to modify its original proposal price in order to meet any cost increase arising from any modifications requested by the Client. This proposal contains privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. CSA is certified by TRACE International Inc. and conducts business ethically and in compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, U.K. Bribery Act, and other anti -bribery legislation. CSA has implemented and strictly adheres to anti -bribery, anti -corruption, and third -party risk management corporate policies and procedures(hM2s://www.traceintemational.org/). CSA holds these standards in high regard and expects the same from its clients and subcontractors. General Terms • Consequences due to coronavirus HSSE have not been included but may result in contingency, including government -imposed quarantine, testing, and other unforeseen impacts. • All staff will conform to CSA's coronavirus mitigation protocol. Any other required protocol(s) will be reconciled via a bridging document reflecting the more conservative approach among plans. • The services described in this proposal are consistent with the Client or Regulatory Document, as well as CSR's experience providing the proposed services under both typical and atypical situations. • Quoted rates are valid for 90 days after the date of the proposal. • Any unspecified costs for third -party services will be billed at cost +5%. Project -Specific Terms • CSA will not be held responsible for any costs or delays incurred due to Government actions, decisions, or rulings when all necessary measures to address all transparent Government concerns have been taken. • Once CSA receives a formal "Notice to Proceed", a mobilization time of 1 week will be required before beginning any on -site work. 27 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. • Mobilization/demobilization includes: project management, equipment setup, travel expenses (transportation, fuel, accommodations, per diem), and labor during travel to and from project location. • Nearshore hardbottom (NSHB) field day includes: labor for three CSA AAUS divers, equipment, fuel, accommodations, and per diem. • NSHB field survey operations within three separate survey efforts, any additional costs incurred due to weather and sea conditions, vessel/equipment, CSA personnel, and/or other delays will be charged at the agreed upon Equipment and Labor Rates as T&M in Table 1. • SSS survey will be charged at the agreed upon price listed in Table 1. • Doctors Pass field survey operations within a single survey effort, any additional costs incurred due to weather and sea conditions, vessel/equipment, CSA personnel, and/or other delays will be charged at the agreed upon Equipment and Labor Rates as T&M in Table 2. • Wiggins Pass field survey operations within a single survey effort, any additional costs incurred due to weather and sea conditions, vessel/equipment, CSA personnel, and/or other delays will be charged at the agreed upon Equipment and Labor Rates as T&M in Table 3. • Tasks la through lc, 2a through 2c, and 3a through 3c assume that the following will be provided by Collier County at no cost to CSA: o Vessel and captain; o Scuba tanks; o Hypack navigation; o Transect maintenance equipment and supplies; and o A vessel log of daily activities. • NSHB Reporting - Project technical details, pertinent information necessary for the Project Description section of the report, and other requirements will be provided to CSA in a timely manner. • NSHB Deliverables - Price for preparation of deliverables is based on a single draft and final document addressing a single set of comments for each deliverable. • SS Survey Deliverables — Price for preparation of deliverables is included in the cost listed in Table 1 and based on a single delivery of results to Collier County. • Doctors Pass Deliverables - Price for preparation of deliverables is based on a single data deliverable directly to FDEP. Please note that no report is required for the pre -construction SAV surveys as per the guidelines set forth by FDEP in the permit (#0331817-004-JM). All deliverables will be provided electronically to FDEP, pricing for preparation of hard copies to Client is not included. • Wiggins Pass Deliverables - Price for preparation of deliverables is based on a single data deliverable directly to FDEP. Please note that no report is required for the pre -construction SAV surveys as per the guidelines set forth by FDEP in the permit (#0331817-004-JM). All deliverables will be provided electronically to FDEP, pricing for preparation of hard copies to Client is not included. • Any presentations and meetings will be provided at additional expense. Vessel and Client Vessel Any vessel that will carry CSA employees may be subject to a vessel inspection by CSA or its designee; failure to meet government and/or industry safety standards may result in rejection by CSA of that vessel; CSA will be held harmless for any costs and schedule change arising from rejection of any vessel failing this inspection. Prices assume that the survey vessel, whether contracted by CSA or Client, is approved by the project country authority and will provide survey navigation services, power source for integrated equipment, and deck operation assistance, as applicable. 28 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. • Price assumes 12 hours per day operations. Equipment • If any proposed equipment becomes unavailable, CSA reserves the right to substitute or replace the equipment with suitable alternatives. If substituting the equipment results in a price increase, then CSA will be required to obtain Client written approval prior to placing said equipment in service. Positioning and Geophysical • This proposal assumes that Collier County will be provide all navigation and positioning services during the field effort with the exception to the SS Survey. 7.0 LITERATURE CITED CB&I Chicago Bridge and Iron. 2015. Collier County, Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging Final Seagrass Biological Monitoring Plan for permits: Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, FDEP permit no. 0331817-004-JM. FDEP file no. 0331817-001-JC. Approved April 16, 2015. Tallahassee Florida. 5 pp. CP&E Coastal Planning and Engineering. 2009. Collier County Nearshore Sidescan Sonar Survey. Submitted to Collier County October 2009. 19 pp. CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 2018a. Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging June 2018 Pre -Dredge Seagrass Survey Report. Aug. 17, 2018.25 pp. Submitted to Collier County CZM and FDEP in fulfillment of permit required monitoring for Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Permit No. 0331817-004-JM. FDEP file no. 0331817-001-JC CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 2018b. Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging September 2018 Post -Dredge Seagrass Survey Report. Nov. 28, 2018. 25 pp. Submitted to Collier County CZM and FDEP in fulfillment of permit required monitoring for Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Permit No. 0331817-004-JM. FDEP file no. 0331817-001-JC CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 2019a. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project 2018 Hardbottom Monitoring Report. Jan. 16, 2019. 131 pp. Submitted to Collier County CZM and FDEP in fulfillment of permit required monitoring for Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Permit No. 0331817-004-JM and the Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel Expansion and Maintenance Project FDEP Permit 0142538-008-JC. CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 2019b. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project 2019 Hardbottom Monitoring Report and Supplemental Post Red Tide Survey. Nov. 25, 2019. 70 pp. Submitted to Collier County CZM and FDEP in fulfillment of permit required monitoring for Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Permit No. 0331817-004-JM and the Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel Expansion and Maintenance Project FDEP Permit 0142538-008-JC. CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 2020. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project 2020 Hardbottom Monitoring Report. Dec. 16, 2020, 140 pp. Submitted to Collier County CZM and FDEP in fulfillment of permit required monitoring for Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Permit No. 0331817-004-JM and the Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel Expansion and Maintenance Project FDEP Permit 0142538-008-JC. 29 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 2022a. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project 2022 Hardbottom Monitoring Report. in pres., 140 pp. For submittal to Collier County CZM and FDEP in fulfillment of permit required monitoring for Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Permit No. 0331817-004-JM and the Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel Expansion and Maintenance Project FDEP Permit 0142538-008-JC. CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. 2022b. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project 2021 Hardbottom Monitoring Report. Jan. 2022, 140 pp. For submittal to Collier County CZM and FDEP in fulfillment of permit required monitoring for Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Permit No. 0331817-004-JM and the Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel Expansion and Maintenance Project FDEP Permit 0142538-008-JC. Earth Tech Environmental LLC. 2020. Wiggins Pass and Water Turkey Bay Channel Maintenance Dredging Project Post -Construction Seagrass Monitoring Report. Nov. 17, 2020. FDEP permit no. 0142538-008 JC. 121 pp. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2018. Collier County, Florida Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan for permits: Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, FDEP permit no. 0331817-004-JM and Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel Expansion and Maintenance Project, FDEP permit no. 0142538-008-JC. July 2018. Tallahassee Florida. 17 pp. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2020. Guidance on Surveys for Potential Impacts to Submerged Aquatic Vegetation. December 8, 2020. Tallahassee Florida. 28 pp. NOAA. 2022. Hurricane Ian's Path of Destruction. National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. October 4, 2022. Florida. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/hunicane-ians-path-of- destruction#:-:text=Ian%20made%201andfall%20that%20day,out%20the%20island's%20power %220grid. Accessed October 19, 2022. 30 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. ATTACHMENTS 31 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. ATTACHMENT A - LABOR RATE SCHEDULE A-1 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC. (CSA) Total Labor Rate Schedule for Collier County Effective 01 January 2023 through 31 May 2024 Labor Categories Abbreviations Hourly Rate Senior Scientist 2 SS2 $ 220.20 Senior Scientist 1 SS1 $ 182.03 Project Scientist 3 PS3 $ 146.80 Project Scientist 2 PS2 $ 111.57 Project Scientist 1 PS1 $ 99.83 GIS Manager GISM $ 146.80 GIS Developer GISD $ 129.18 GIS Analyst GISA $ 96.88 GIS Technician GIST $ 85.14 Project Manager 2 PM2 $ 184.97 Project Manager 1 PM1 $ 129.18 Assistant Project Manager APM $ 82.21 Operations Manager OM $ 202.59 Operations Supervisor 2 OS2 $ 164.42 Operations Supervisor 1 OS1 $ 135.05 Technician 3 T3 $ 108.63 Technician 2 T2 $ 93.96 Technician 1 T1 $ 67.52 Technical Editor 2 TE2 $ 117.44 Technical Editor 1 TE1 $ 91.02 Document Processor DP $ 79.28 Clerical CLR $ 58.72 Field Equipment and Supplies: CSA field equipment is billed on a time -rate basis according to CSA's Field Equipment Rate Schedule (1-2). Travel and Per Diem: Billed according to Section 112.061 Florida Statutes Subcontracts and Consultants: Billed at cost plus 5%. Other Expendable Supplies, Materials, and Services: Billed at cost plus 5%. Prices are firm only when signed by an authorized company representative or when taken from current Rate Schedules. CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 8502 SW Kansas Avenue, Stuart, Florida 34997 Tel: (772) 219-3000; Fax: (772) 219-3010 e-mail: csa@conshelf.com web: www.csaocean.com 24-Hour Response Line: (844) 272-8320 REGIONAL OFFICES 11953-A FM 529, Houston, Texas 77041 Tel: (772) 219-3000 2261 Denley Road, Houma, Louisiana 70363 Tel: (772) 219-3000 ATTACHMENT B - EQUIPMENT RATE SCHEDULE Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC. FIELD EQUIPMENT RATE SCHEDULE Effective 01 January 2023 through 31 May 2024 GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTENDED DESCRIPTION PRICE 1 - NAV & COMM Survey Software Hypack Max, Hypack Lite 110 Multibeam Survey Software Hypack Hysweep 140 Computer Desktop or Laptop CPU 70 Network Storage Device - QNAP QNAP TES 110 GPS WAAS Garmin 76, 76CSX 15 GPS GNSS - high accuracy - handheld Trimble GeoXH 90 GPS DGPS - dual -antenna system Trimble SPS-461 90 GPS GNSS-GLONASS & Heading System Trimble SPS855 & SPS555H 225 GPS RTK - Sub cm accuracy Trimble R8 RTK 600 GLONASS Navigation System Applanix RTK POS MV Surfmaster SFF IP68 500 Diver Survey & Sonar System Shark Marine Navigator D11 850 USBL - System w/ beacons LinkQuest TrackLink 1500 330 USBL - High Accuaracy GyroLISBL© System w/ beacons Sonardyne Ranger 2 2,200 Telemetry Survey System Maxon 450MHz 30 HPR Motion Sensor SMC IMU-108 70 Satellite Phone- Hand Held Iridium w/o usage Iridium 9505 A 50 Satellite Phone/Internet FleetBroadband w/o usage Thrane & Thrane Sailor 150 200 2 - REMOTE SENSING Hydrophone Cetacean CR-1, C54 20 Sound Source Ocean Sonics icTalk 100 Digital Hydrophone Ocean Sonics icListen 200 Acoustic Recorder Loggerhead DSG 110 Acoustic Recorder & Signal Analyzer Develogic Sono.Vault, Sono.Vault HF 210 Pressure Sensor Array PCB Pressure Sensors W138A01 w/ line conditioners 400 Acoustic Modeling Software Navcon dBSea 143 Scientific Echosounder - 200kHz Simrad EK60 w/ deck unit - 200 kHz 550 Scientific Echosounder - 38kHz Simrad EK60 w/ deck unit - 38 kHz 750 Scientific Echosounder - 18kHz Simrad EK60 w/ deck unit - 18 kHz 1,050 Echoview Software Myriax LiveView 200 Single -Beam Echosounder - 200 kHz Ohmex Sonarmite BT 100 Single -Beam Echosounder - 12/24/200 kHz Teledyne Odom CV300 Single Beam 300 Digital Side Scan Sonar L-3 Communications Klein 3900 400 Digital Side Scan Sonar L-3 Communications Klein 3000 500 Digital Side Scan Sonar & Sub -Bottom L-3 Communications Klein 3000/3310 750 Marine Magnometer Geometrics Marine Magnometer G-822 180 Sub -Bottom System Edgetech SB216 495 Multi -Beam Scanning Sonar Kongsberg Mesotech M3 500 SonarWiz Processing System SonarWiz 6 150 ASV (Autonomous Surface Vessel) Utility Class Searobotics USV-2600 1,500 ASV (Autonomous Surface Vessel) Surveyor Class Searobotics M 1.8 1,500 3 - REMOTE IMAGING MiniROV SeaBotix LBV300-5 w/ 156m tether 950 Inspection Class ROV Saab Seaeye Falcon ROV w/ 440m tether 1,500 Towed SD Video System (30m) Aluminum sled w/ video, still, LED lights & lasers, SHIP winch, cable 400 Towed SD Video System (300m) Aluminum sled w/ video, still, P&T, LED lights & lasers, 20HP winch, cable 1,850 Towed SD Video System (3,000m/6,000m) DTS 6000V / Nexus MK E 2,000 D Subsea Video Camera DSP&L MSC 2000, Insite Pacific Aurora, Insite Pacific Nova 70 HD Subsea Video Camera Insite Pacific MiniZeus 300 Digital Still Camera System Imenco SIDS 1210 350 Seabed Camera System (6,000m) OSIL SeaCam, W&A SOLO II ARC 100 Photogrammetric Processing Software Agisoft Metashape Professional 200 Video Data Management System VisualSoft VisualArchive 150 Digital Video Recorder - SD VisualSoft VisuaIDVR Dual 200 Digital Video Recorder - HD VisualSoft VisuaIDVR-HD 300 Video & Metadata Encoder VITEC MGW Premium Encoder HD 415 1-2 (12/14/20) 1 of 4 CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC. FIELD EQUIPMENT RATE SCHEDULE Effective 1 January 2021 GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTENDED DESCRIPTION PRICE 4 - IMAGING / DIVER IMAGING Diver GoPro Camera System GoPro Hero w/ LCD display, 2x SOLA 2000 lights 35 Diver HD Video Camera System Canon XA-10, Sony HDR-HC7, Sony HDR-HC9 95 Diver Digital Still Camera System Canon G11, Canon G12, Sony A5000 55 5 - WQ & PHYS 0 & MOORINGS CTD - Optical Teledyne RDI Citadel -NV 75 CTD - Real Time only Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-49 FastCAT 100 CTD - Deep water w/ internal data logger Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-19PIus V2 w/ pump 175 Real Time CTD Kit (PDIM w/ deck unit) Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-33 80 CTD Auto Fire Module Sea -Bird Electronics AFM 40 Altimeter (6,000m) Teledyne Benthos PSA-916 20 DO Sensor Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-43 50 pH Sensor (1200m) Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-18 10 pH/ORP Sensor (Redox) Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-27 35 Turbidity Sensor Campbell Scientific OBS-3+ 15 PAR Sensor Biospherical Instruments QSP2300 25 PAR Logger w/ GPS Li-Cor LI-1500G/LI-1925A 30 Fluorometer WetLabs CDOM-FLCDRTD, WetLabs ECO-CDOM CD2000 60 Chlorophyll & Turbidity Sensor WetLabs ECO- FLNTURTD, WetLabs ECO-FLRTD 60 pH Sensor (6,000m) AMT UT-pH-EM 40 pH/ORP Sensor (Redox) (6,000m) AMT UT-RE-EM 60 Temperature & Depth Sensor Seabird Electronics SBE-39 25 Digital Pressure Sensor Seabird Electronics SBE-50 25 Depth Logger RBR Solo3 D 30 CTD - Shallow water w/ internal data logger Y51 650MDS (pH/DO/Turbidity), Hanna Instrument H19829 125 Hanna Instruments Multiparameter Probe (pH/ORP/EC/DO Hanna Instruments H19829 (pH/ORP/EC/DO) 10m 200 Turbidity Logger Campbell Scientific OBS-3a 25 Lab Turbiditimeter Hach 2100P 20 Lab Spectrophotometer Hach DR2800 30 Lab Culture Incubator Hach 153-2 Sound Velocity Profiler AML Base X2, SV- & P-Xchange 80 45 ADCP - 1 MHz Nortek AquaDopp 120 ADCP- 600kHz or 1200 kHz Teledyne RDI WHMVM 600, WHM 1200 Rowe SeaWatch 600kHz 150 ADCP - 400kHz Nortek AWAC 400kHz 230 ADCP - 300 kHz Teledyne RDI WHS 300-1-UG48 Rowe SeaWatch 300kHz 250 ADCP - 300 kHz (6,000m) Teledyne RDI WHS 300-1-UG50 260 ADCP - 75kHz w/ subsea mooring Teledyne RDI WHLS 75-1-2 350 ADCP - 55kHz w/ subsea mooring Nortek Signature55 55kHz w/ elliptical buoy 820 ADCP Bottom Mount Apple Machine & Supply Bottom Mount 25 ADCP Trawl Mount Mooring Systems MTRBM 60 ADCP Mooring Mount - Shallow water Mooring Systems In -Line Mount, Mooring Systems WH Buoy Mounts, Mooring Systems EB-F-33/FB-33-AWAC 40 ADCP Mooring Mount 1,500m Mooring Systems SB-35/FB-35-WH - 1,500m 60 Syntactic Float Mooring Systems SF-30-1,000m 50 Modular Floatation - Medium Trelleborg Micro Modular Buoy (207lbs/233lbs buoyancy) 120 Modular Floatation - Small Trelleborg Nano Modular Buoy (73lbs/76lbs buoyancy) 40 Trawl Float Mooring Systems 14" Triple Trawl Float w/ strength member-800m 10 Glass Flotation Sphere Teledyne Benthos 17" HR Glass Float - 6,000m 10 Subsurface Locator Beacon Xeos Iridium 9603-D-I, XEOS XMi-11K 40 Tide Gauge Valeport miniTide 50 Wave Gauge RBR RBRvirtuoso D 25 Acoustic Release Teledyne R12K 150 Acoustic Release Teledyne Benthos 866-A 100 Acoustic Release Deck Unit Teledyne Benthos UDB900M, UDB9400 125 Acoustic Modem LinkQuest UVM 2000 100 1-2 (12/14/20) 2 of 4 CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC. FIELD EQUIPMENT RATE SCHEDULE Effective 1 January 2021 GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTENDED DESCRIPTION PRICE 6 - SAMPLING Rosette - 6 Position (600m) Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-55 200 Rosette -12 Position (6,000m) Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-32 400 Rosette - 24 Position (6,000m) Sea -Bird Electronics SBE-32 600 Niskin Water Sampler 1.2L / 2.5L / 4.OL General Oceanics Niskin 1.2L / 2.5L / 4.OL 10 Go -Flo Water Sampler - 5L General Oceanics GoFlo SL Teflon coated 30 Go -Flo Water Sampler- 10L General Oceanics GoFlo 101-Teflon coated 40 Niskin Water Sampler - 30L General Oceanics Niskin 30L 50 Peristaltic Water Pump Geotech Environmental 900-1280 15 ROV Push Corer ROV Product Services 3" and 4" 10 ROV Box Corer Searobotics 0.25m x 0.25m 75 ROV Suction Sampler Searobotics SLRP-3 650 Mega -Corer Ocean Scientific Intl Mega -Corer 12-Core 2,500 Box Corer - Small Gray O'Hara design 0.25m x 0.25m 50 Box Corer - Medium Gray O'Hara design 0.35m x 0.35m 75 Box Corer - Large Gray O'Hara design 0.48m x 0.48m 200 Smith Mac Sediment sampler 0.30m x 0.30m 100 Van Veen Sediment Sampler - Small - Young modified 0.20m x 0.20m 25 Van Veen Sediment Sampler - Medium - Young modified 0.30m x 0.30m 35 Van Veen Sediment Sampler - Large 0.51m x 0.42m 65 Ponar / Eckman Sediment Sampler Ponar Petite 0.152m x 0.152m/2.4L, Ponar Standard 0.229 x 0.229m/8.2L Eckman 10 Sediment Sieve Station CSA OS SWS-002 100 MOCNESS 1m Biological Environmental Sampling System MOC-1 (w/ frame, sensors, controls & nets) 1,500 MOCNESS 10m Biological Environmental Sampling System MOC-10 (w/ frame, sensors, controls & nets) 2,000 Midwater Trawl System Superior Trawl 1.02 x 3.20m 650 Bongo / Neuston / Manta Net System Bongo 0.65m Neuston 1x2m, Manta 250 Ballloon Trawl Unit Terrebonne Otter Trawl 15 Triangle / Rock / Oyster Dredge Kahlsico Triangular Dredge 0.60m Benthos Rock Dredge 0.41m x 0.99m Oyster 15 OST Rock Dredge System OST 506-100-001B (2m x 0.8m) 225 Electro Fish Shocker Smith -Root 5kW pulsed DC 60 7 - DIVING Scuba Equipment Set 25 Scuba Tank 80 cubic ft 8 Acoustic Diver Recall System 20 Diver Comm. System (deck unit, masks) 200 Brownies Hooka Compressor Set 80 Dive Tank Compressor 50 8 - DECK GEAR 125 HP Slip Ring Winch w/ 6,000m coax DT Marine 3125EHLWR 2,500 75 HP Slip Ring Winch w/o cable 72480 ROV/ROTV 800 60 HP Slip Ring Winch w/ synthetic line DT Marine 3060EHLW w/ 6,000m of Unitrex HDWE 5/8" 1,500 50 HP Slip Ring Winch w/ synthetic line DT Marine 3050EHLWR w/ 3,300m or 5,000m of ????????????? 1,300 40 HP Slip Ring Winch w/o cable DT Marine 3040EHLWR 700 25 HP Slip Ring Winch w/ synthetic line or coax DT Marine 3025EHLWR w/ ??????? 800 20 HP Slip Ring Winch w/ towed video cable DT Marine 1020EHLWR w/ 1,200m of Falmat FM121108-1BF 100 5 HP Slip Ring Winch w/o cable DT Marine 305EHA 120 Pneumatic Tugger Winch w/ cable F&M Mafco HUL40 4,000Ibs 85 Hydraulic or Electric Tugger Winch Ramsey HD-P 8000, Smittybilt X20 12K Gent 25 1,500 - 3,000m Conductor Cable Tyco Electronics Single Conductor A310255, Coax A302799, A301241, 7-Conductor 7H472K, 7H42RZ 200 20 HP Gas Hydraulic Power Unit Stanley 100 1-2 (12/14/20) 3 of 4 CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC. FIELD EQUIPMENT RATE SCHEDULE Effective 1 January 2021 through May 2023 GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTENDED DESCRIPTION PRICE 8 - DECK GEAR (continued) 10T Articulating A -Frame w/ 100HP HPU New Industries 19'x15' w/ DT Marine 100HP HPU 1,700 10T Articulating A -Frame w/ 50HP HPU New Industries 19'x15' w/ DT Marine 50HP HPU 1,000 5T Articulating A -Frame w/ 15HP or 30 HP HPU New Industries 17'x8' w/ DT Marine 15HP or 30HP HPU 800 Vortex Side Pole w/ saddle FWC 301,191 200 Tow Block Campbell Specialty 36"McKissick 16" 25 Digital Cable Counter & Block Remontec DTD 20B, Measurement Technology LCI-90i 70 Dredge Pump AMT 2" 25 Honda Generator - 2kW, 5kW EU2000i, EB5000X 50 Generator - 13kW (Diesel) Voltmaster 13000 110 Light Tower w/ generator Terex AL4000 100 Gas/Electric Air Compressor 90 PSI 30 Mobile Deck Storage Container (8'x20') 8'x20' 25 Mobile Work Van (8'x20') 8'x20' 250 9 - BOATS & TRUCKS 49 ft R/V Dolphin Marine Science / Geophysical Survey Vessel 4,500 27ft Catamaran w/ trailer Trailered Marine Science / Geophysical Survey Vessel 2,400 28 ft Mako Boat w/ trailer Mako 650 25 ft Parker Boat w/ trailer Parker 550 25 ft Pontoon Boat w/ trailer Tri-Pontoon 200 Truck I Ford F250, F350, GMC Yukon, GMC Suburban 150 Longterm rates available Notes: The rates listed above apply when CSA is responsible for loss and repairs. Rate schedules are subject to revision on each 1 January. This Schedule may be updated as needed throughout the year to include the addition of new equipment. Any changes to existing prices will occur only during a 1 January revision. Prices are firm only when signed by an authorized company representative or when taken form current Rate Schedules. CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 8502 SW Kansas Ave Stuart, FL 34997 USA +1 772 219 3000 csa@conshelf.com csaocean.com U.S. REGIONAL OFFICES FLORIDA, LOUISIANA, TEXAS, CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL LOCATIONS TRINIDAD, QATAR, BRAZIL, CYPRUS, SINGAPORE, AUSTRALIA 1-2 (12/14/20) 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT C - M&E COST PROPOSAL FOR SIDE -SCAN SURVEY C-1 Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. M&E Morgan & Eklund, Inc. 4909 US Highway I Vero Beach, Florida 32967 October 17, 2022 CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. Attn: Lystina Kabay 8502 SW Kansas Avenue Stuart, FL 34997 RE: Side -scan Sonar Survey, Collier County, FL Dear Lystina: Phone: 772-388-5364 Fax: 772-388-31 65 Morgan & Eklund, Inc. (M&E) is pleased to provide you with the following proposal to furnish professional survey services for the above -referenced project. M&E will perform a nearshore side -scan sonar survey to map hardbottom between Collier County FDEP R monuments R-18 and R-79 approximately 11 miles N-S and from shore out 1500'. Work will be performed in Spring/Summer 2023. Deliverables will be a side -scan sonar mosaic and .pdf drawing. Price will be as follows: Lump Sum Fee ................................................. $ 50,875.00 As always, Morgan & Eklund, Inc. is looking forward to working with you and CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. on this project. Sincerely, David W. Coggin, PSM Vice President DWC:dmc Billing: will be invoiced upon completion of project Terms: Pay when paid CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. 1 1011712022 Cost Breakdown: M&E Side -Scan Sonar Survey Labor $ 50,874.65 $ 15,587.50 Chief Surveyor Hour 6 $ 171.00 $ 1,026.00 Assistant Project Manager Hour 2 $ 85.00 $ 170.00 Hydrographic Survey Lead Hour 41 $ 107.00 $ 4,387.00 Hydrographic Survey Lead (OT) Hour 15 $ 160.50 $ 2,407.50 Survey Instrument Person Hour 40 $ 82.00 $ 3,280.00 Survey Instrument Person (OT) Hour 15 $ 123.00 $ 1,845.00 Senior Computer Technician Hour 24 $ 103.00 $ 2,472.00 Field Equipment $ 3,040.00 Survey Vehicle Day 2 $ 150.00 $ 300.00 Odom CVM Fathometer Day 4 $ 85.00 $ 340.00 Hypack Navigation Software Day 4 $ 50.00 $ 200.00 Trimble MPS500 Marine IPS Day 4 $ 550.00 $ 2,200.00 Purchases $ 460.00 Boat Dockage Day 4 $ 115.00 $ 460.00 Leased Equipment $ 2,760.00 25' Parker Survey Boat w/Trailer Day 4 $ 690.00 $ 2,760.00 Lodging $ 2,070.00 2 Persons, 6 days Day 12 $ 172.50 $ 2,070.00 Per Diem $ 814.20 2 Persons, 6 days Day 12 $ 67.85 $ 814.20 Subcontractor* $ 2,760.00 Lump Sonographics Sum 1 $ 26,142.95 $ 26,142.95 *Sonographics $ 22,733.00 Labor $ 16,500.00 Operator/Tech (Field) Day 7 $ 1,375.00 $ 9,625.00 Operator/Tech (Office) Day 5 $ 1,375.00 $ 6,875.00 Equipment $ 4,645.00 4200 Side Scan (Mob/Demob) Day 2 $ 390.00 $ 780.00 4200 Side Scan (Field) Day 5 $ 650.00 $ 3,250.00 Processing Software Day 5 $ 123.00 $ 615.00 Expenses $ 1,588.00 Travel to Collier Day 1 $ 277.00 $ 277.00 Field Days Day 5 $ 238.00 $ 1,119.00 Travel Back Day 1 $ 121.00 $ 121.00 Expenses based on: GSA Per diem & lodging rates Collier Cty 6/23-9/23 mileage:117 miles for mob day, 117 miles for demob day, 20 miles each survey day Subcontractor Cost Plus 15% CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. 2 1011712022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an expenditure of $26,220 in Tourist Development Tax funds to Rick Croft Enterprises, Inc. dba Texas Trailers under Contract Number FSA20-EQU18.0 — Heavy Equipment (PiggyBack Contract 251) for the purchase of (2) mobile cargo trailers for the storage of equipment and supplies used for beach maintenance activities and make a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To purchase (2) mobile cargo trailers for the purpose of storage at each beach location maintained by Coastal Zone Management (CZM): • Tigertail Beach Park — 480 Hernando Drive, Marco Island, FL 34145 • Vanderbilt Beach Park —100 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, FL 34108 CONSIDERATIONS: On September 28, 2022, Hurricane Ian passed offshore of Collier County beaches producing extreme waves and storm surge that inundated not only coastal areas but some upland areas as well. CZM equipment that was located within surge zones and was transportable was moved inland prior to the storm as a preventative measure. As a result, those County assets incurred no damages. However, stationary County storage sheds permanently attached to the pavement at Vanderbilt Beach parking garage and Tigertail Beach suffered damage from the storm surge. To prevent future damages to both storage units and stored equipment, Coastal Zone Management proposes purchasing two new mobile storage units to replace the stationary sheds. Upon the threat of a storm event in the future, the mobile storage sheds will be towed to inland locations safer from flooding. The purpose of the sheds is to store tools and equipment that are used in daily operations for maintaining the beaches at the addresses noted above. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item will be presented to the Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) on February 9, 2023 and the Tourist Development Council (TDC) on February 27, 2023. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. — CMG FISCAL IMPACT: A budget amendment is required in the amount of $26,220 to reallocate funding from reserves within TDC Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Fund (195) to Hurricane Ian, Project 50280. The source of funding is the Tourist Development Tax. The current reserve budget in Fund (195) is $40,721,300. RECOMMENDATION: To approve an expenditure of $26,220 in Tourist Development Tax funds to Rick Croft Enterprises, Inc. dba Texas Trailers under Contract Number FSA20-EQU18.0 — Heavy Equipment (PiggyBack Contract 251) for the purchase of (2) mobile cargo trailers for the storage of equipment and supplies used for beach maintenance activities and make a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism. Prepared By: Andrew Miller, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division Akas Trailers Gainesville, FL 352-378-4756 Nq 5601 NW 13th Street Gainesville, FL 32653 Office 352-378-4756 Name / Address Collier County BOCC Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Naples, FL 34112 Estimate Date Estimate # 1/23/2023 8303 Item Description Qty Amount Total CARGO MATE S... Quote from Florida Sheriffs Contract # FSA20-EQU18.0 Heavy Equipment 1 10,994.00 10,994.00 Contract Specification #442 - Cargo Mate BL716TA2 - Base Trailer Delivered to the Southern District NS8524TA3 8.5 x 24 V-Nose Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 10,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear 1 900.00 900.00 Ramp Door, Spring Axles, Flat One Piece Aluiminum Roof, .030 Exterior Skin, 24" Stone Guard, LED Lighting, 3/4" Plywood Floor, 16" OC Tubing Wall Posts, 6' 9" Ht CMF1 6" Additional Height Per Linear Foot 24 24.00 576.00 CMF7 60" Extended Triple Tube Tongue 1 420.00 420.00 CMCL4 Plastic Flow Thru Side Wall Vent (Pair) 1 95.00 95.00 CMD1 Side Door Flush Lock Handle In Addition To Cambar 1 125.00 125.00 Dealer Additional trailers as specified above 1 13,110.00 13,110.00 Subtotal $26,220.00 Sales Tax (0.0%) $0.00 Total $26,220.00 C01er Caw.nty Collier County Ad min istrativeSenricesDepartment Cooperative Purchasing Request Form Procurement Services Division Instructions Allowable per BCC Procurement Ordinance Section 11.4 and the annual BCC approved list of approved cooperatives. Complete the following information and submit to purchasing with the required backup documentation. (Required backup documentation includes, but not limited to: Solicitation, Proposal, Tabulation, Proof of Advertisement, Contract) Requester Name: Mario Menendez Division: Fleet Management Vendor Name: Multiple Venders Requested Items: Heavy Equipment and Other Fleet Equipment Sponsor Agency/Contact: Florida Sheriffs Association (FSA) 850-877-2165 cpp@flsheriffs.org Contract Name and Number: FSA20-EQU18.0 Heavy Equipment Estimated Spend Amount Per Fiscal Year: $450,000.00 Award Date: 10/01/2020 Expiration Date: g/30/2023 Renewals: 2 - 1 yr options Backup Documents: Solicitation IV(l Proposal IV(l Contract ✓ Tabulation ✓ Advertisement IV(l Price List ✓ Additional Documents/Commentary: https://www.flsheriffs.org/law-enforcement-programs/cooperative-purchasing-program/bid-announcements Website of Contract: https://www.flsheriffs.org/law-enforcement-programs/purchasing/fsa20equ 18 Scope of Services in Contract: Purchase Heavy Equipment, Trailers, and Other Fleet Equipment Competitive Event: (Type and no. of solicitation) ITB Florida Sheriff Association ITB FSA20-EQU 18.0 Summary of Competition: (Number of proposals received and vendors awarded) The Florida Sheriffs Association invites interested Bidders, including Motor Vehicle Manufacturers and Dealers/Certified Representatives to submit responses in accordance with these solicitation documents. Several vendors were awarded by zone. Piggyback Clause: (Listed in solicitation or Contract): 1.09 ELIGIBLE PURCHASERS OF CONTRACT: Awarded bids, or contract prices, will be extended and guaranteed to the Florida Sheriffs Association, any unit of local government, political subdivision or agency of the State of Florida. This includes, but is not limited to counties, municipalities, sheriffs' offices, clerks, property appraisers, tax collectors, supervisors of elections, school boards or districts, water management districts, police and fire departments, emergency response units, state universities and colleges, or other state, local or regional government entities within the State of Florida. Rationale for Use: Solicitation sales volume needed price savings for the County given the number of public agencies participating; Reduced the number of staff hours and vendor dollars in putting together a response to a specific Collier County Solicitation. The Requesting Division and Procurement Services Director acknowledge that the attached contract was competitively solicited according to the Board's Procurement Ordinance 2017-08, Section 18 and that the terms and conditions of the purchase are competitive in the market and favorable to the County. Requested b : Mario Menendez q y Signature: MenendezMarlo Digitallysi.10.08 Me9:17-0Mario Date: 2020.10.08 15:29:17-04'00' Date: Division Director: Dan Croft Digitally signed by Signature: CroftDan Date: 2020.10.1314:02D23D -04'00' Date:10/13/20 Procurement Strategist: Sara Schneeberger g SchneebergerSar Digitally sirged by Sar Signature: a Data 2 20.10.150 Date: 2020.10.15 07:57:12-04'00' Date: Procurement Director Catherine Bigelow or designee: Bigelowally atheri by Signature: BigelowCatherineDigebwCathedb Date: 2020.10.15 14:38:38 -04'00' Date: Cargo Mate Trailer Options Florida Sheriff's Heavy Equipment Contract FSA20-EQU18.0 Item # 442 Texas Trailers Sales and Service "We're Behind You All The Way" Contact - Rick Croft Email - rick@texastrailersFL.com Phone - 352-378-4756 Base Model - Blazer Cargo Mate Heavy Duty 7'x16' Radius Front Cargo Trailer. GVWR - 7,000 lb. Includes, Side Door and Double Rear Doors. FRAME: Formed angle top and bottom sills; All exposed steel primed and painted; Positive lock ball coupler; Tongue jack; Safety chains - DOT rated. FLOOR/WALLS/ROOF: 3/4" plywood floor; 3/8"" plywood interior liner; .030" prefinished aluminum exterior, state colors; Smooth galvanized steel or one-piece aluminum roof; Fiberglass front cap; Extruded aluminum bottom trim; Extruded aluminum roof cove with drip rail; Double locking door on rear. AXLES: Tandem 3,500 lb. torflex axles; 15" wheels; 205 x 15 trailer rated tires; Electric brakes with breakaway switch. LIGHTING SYSTEM: Protected turn/stop/tail lights; Clearance lights; Wiring run in conduit; Heavy duty trailer plug. MISCELLANEOUS: Spare wheel and tire. Zone Cargo Mate Base Trailer Cost Western 131_716TA2 - 7x16 Heavy Duty Cargo Trailer 66" HT, Side Door, Double Rear Doors $ 10,926.00 Northern 131_716TA2 - 7x16 Heavy Duty Cargo Trailer 66" HT, Side Door, Double Rear Doors $ 10,147.00 Central 131_716TA2 - 7x16 Heavy Duty Cargo Trailer 6'6" HT, Side Door, Double Rear Doors $ 10,486.00 Southern 131_716TA2 - 7x16 Heavy Duty Cargo Trailer 6'6" HT, Side Door, Double Rear Doors $ 10,994.00 Model Code Single Axle Medium Duty Cargo Trailers NS58SA 5x8 V-Nose Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 2990 lb. GVWR - Double Rear Doors $ (5,950.00) NS610SA 6x10 V-Nose Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 2990 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (4,990.00) NS612SA 6x12 V-Nose Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 2990 Ib.GVWR- Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (4,890.00) NS712SA 7x12 V-Nose Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 2990 Ib.GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (3,890.00) Single Axle Heavy Duty Cargo Trailers BL58SA 5x8 Heavy Duty Duty Cargo Trailer 2990 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (5,870.00) BL612SA 6x12 Heavy Duty Cargo Trailer 2990 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (4,350.00) Tandem Axle Medium Duty Cargo Trailers NS612TA2 6 x12 V-Nose Medium Duty Tandem Axel Cargo Trailer 7000 lb. GVWR- Side Door - Dbl. Rear Doors $ (3,770.00) NS712TA2 7x12 V-Nose Medium Duty Tandem Axel Cargo Trailer 7000 lb. GVWR- Side Door - Dbl. Rear Doors $ (3,280.00) NS714TA2 7x14 V-Nose Medium Duty Tandem Axel Cargo Trailer 7000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Dbl. Rear Drs $ (2,885.00) NS716TA2 7x16 V-Nose Medium Duty Tandem Axel Cargo Trailer 7000# GVWR - Side Door - Dbl. Rear Drs. $ (2,610.00) NS8516TA2 8.5x20 V-Nose Medium Duty Tandem Axel Cargo Trailer 7000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp $ (580.00) NS8520TA2 8.5x20 V-Nose Medium Duty Tandem Axel Cargo Trailer 7000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp $ (290.00) Model Code Tandem Axle Medium Duty Cargo Trailers NS8516TA3 8.5 x 16 Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 10,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ (30.00) NS8520TA3 8.5 x 20 Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 10,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 500.00 NSU8524TA3 8.5 x 24 Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 10,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 900.00 NSU8524TA4 8.5 x 24 Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 12,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 1,700.00 NSU8528TA3 8.5 x 28 Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 10,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 1,300.00 NSU8528TA4 8.5 x 28 Medium Duty Cargo Trailer 12,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 2,400.00 Tandem Axle Heavy Duty Cargo Trailers BL612TA2 6 x12 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 7000# GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (2,950.00) BL714TA2 7x14 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 7,000 # GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (1,050.00) BL714TA3 7x14 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 9,990# GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ (210.00) BL716TA3 7 x 16 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 10,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ 110.00 BL820TA3 8 x 20 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 10000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ 100.00 BL824TA3 8 x 24 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 10000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ 1,700.00 BL824TA4 8 x 24 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 14,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ 2,600.00 BL828TA4 8 x 28 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 14,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Double Rear Doors $ 3,300.00 QF8516TA3 8.5X16 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer - 10,000# GVWR - Side Door, Ramp Door $ 3,500.00 QF8520TA3 8.5X20 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer - 10,000# GVWR - Side Door, Ramp Door $ 4,500.00 QF8524TA3 8.5 X 24 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer - 10,000# GVWR - Side Door, Ramp Door $ 5,200.00 QF8524TA4 8.5 X 24 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer - 12,000# GVWR - Side Door, Ramp Door $ 6,500.00 QF8528TA5 8.5 X 28 Heavy Duty Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer - 14,000# GVWR - Side Door, Ramp Door $ 6,500.00 EL8520TA2 Eliminator 8.5x20 Motorsport Style Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 7,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 4,750.00 EL8524TA3 Eliminator 8.5x24 Motorsport Style Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 10,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 6,480.00 EL8524TA5 Eliminator 8.5x24 Motorsport Style Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 14,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 9,160.00 EL8528TA5 Eliminator 8.5x28 Motorsport Style Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 14,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 10,100.00 EL8532TA5 Eliminator 8.5x32 Motorsport Style Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 14,000 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 11,100.00 ELG8434TA4 Eliminator Gooseneck 8.5 x 34' Motorsport Style Tandem Axle Cargo Trailer 14,700 lb. GVWR - Side Door - Rear Ramp Door $ 12,400.00 Delete Options Option Code Description Deduct CMSPAREDEL Delete Spare Tire On Base Trailer Credit $ (90.00) Add Options Option Code Couplers / Jacks / Frame Add CMJC1 Adjustable 2-5/16" Ball Coupler $ 205.00 CMJC2 Adjustable Pintle-Eye Coupler $ 180.00 CMJC3 Extra Heavy -Duty Tongue Jack 7,000 Cap (upgrade from standerd jack) $ 220.00 CMJC4 Sand Pad on Tongue Jack $ 20.00 CMJC5 Corner Posts Drop -Down Jacks w/ Sand Pad $ 165.00 CMJC6 Electric Tongue Jack w/ Light and 12V Battery (Tag Models Only) $ 600.00 Frame CMF1 6" Additional Height Per Linear Foot $ 24.00 CMF2 12" Additional Height Per Linear Foot $ 36.00 CMF3 Additional Wall Posts (12" O/C) Per Linear Foot $ 22.00 CMF4 Additional Floor Crossmembers (12" C/C) Per Linear Foot $ 23.00 CMF5 44" Triple Tube Tongue $ 320.00 CMF6 54" Extended Triple Tube Tongue $ 370.00 CMF7 60" Extended Triple Tube Tongue $ 420.00 CMF8 Spread Axle Configuration $ 1,475.00 Continued Doors - Ramps - Windows CMD1 Side Door Flushlock Handle in Addition to Cambar $ 125.00 CMD2 30"x15" Horizontal Radius Window w/ Slider and Screen $ 260.00 CMD3 30"x30" Radius Window w/ Slider and Screen $ 490.00 CMD4 24" Entrance Door with Cambar $ 225.00 CMDS 36" Entrance Door With Cambar $ 325.00 CMD6 36" RV Door With Window and Flush Lock $ 590.00 CMD7 Standard Duty Rear Ramp Door $ 390.00 CMD8 Medium Duty Rear Ramp Door $ 460.00 CMD9 Heavy Duty Rear Ramp Door $ 640.00 CMD10 Alum Tread Plate Gap Filler Insert to Cover Ramp Door Hine $ 180.00 CMD11 Reinforce Existing Rear Ramp Door $ 215.00 CMD12 36"x24" Baggage Dr w/ Key Lock $ 245.00 CMD14 Pull -Out Aluminum Step for Side Door $ 530.00 Exterior CMEX1 .040 Extra Heavy Duty Aluminum Exterior Skin Per. Linear Foot $ 29.00 CMEX2 8' Alum Roof Platform w/ 42" Fold Down Rail $ 2,735.00 CMEX3 Stationary Aluminum Ladder $ 625.00 CMEX4 Aluminum Ladder Rack Section Ea. $ 185.00 CMEXS Roll Up Awning 8500 Series $ 1,400.00 CMEX6 Roll Up Awning 9000 Series $ 1,825.00 CMEX7 Roll Up Electric Awning $ 3,675.00 CMEX8 Aluminum ATP Tongue Box $ 525.00 Interior and Accessories CM11 3/4" Plywood In Place Of 3/8" On Side Walls Per Linear Foot $ 20.00 CM12 2x6 Treated Yellow Pine Floor Per Linear Foot $ 70.00 CM13 Gray Marble Vinyl Floor Liner Foot $ 28.00 CM14 Rubber Tread Plate Floor Per Linear Foot $ 48.00 CM15 Rubber Round Raised Coin Floor Per Linear Foot $ 48.00 CM16 Bead Board Wall Insulation Per Linear Foot $ 38.00 CM13 R7 Wall Insulation Per. Linear Foot $ 55.00 CM17 Insulate Ceiling w/ 3/16" White Vinyl Liner $ 38.00 CM18 Insulate Ceiling w/ 3/16" White Aluminum Liner $ 59.00 CM19 Partition Wall w/ Door (Specify Door Width) Per Linear Foot $ 69.00 CM110 Kick Plate (3/4" Plywood; 12" High) Per Linear Foot $ 15.00 CM111 3/16" White Vinyl Wall Liner $ 20.00 CM112 .030 White Alum Wall Liner (Other Colors Avail) $ 65.00 CM114 Pressure Treated 3/4" Plywood In Place Of 3/4" Standard Plywood Floor Per. Linear Ft. $ 26.00 CM115 Three Place Trimmer Rack For Landscape Tools (Leave Loose For Customer To Install) $ 375.00 CM116 36" Track Pad On Lower Walls (Gray) Per. Linear Ft $ 33.00 Cabinet / Shelving CMC1 Overhead Cabinet Up To 8' Long $ 1,075.00 CMC2 Additional Length - OH Cabinets $ 160.00 CMC3 8' Base Cabinet w/ Galvanized Top $ 1,300.00 CMC4 Additional Length - Base Cabinets $ 170.00 CIVICS Stand -Up Closet $ 825.00 CMC6 Base Cabinet Shelf $ 180.00 CMC7 6 Drawer Tool Box $ 2,007.00 CMC8 Drawer In Cabinet, Ea. $ 355.00 CMCS Fixed Shelf With 3" Aluminum Lip Per LF $ 86.00 CMC10 Countertop With Rubberized Black Tuff Ply - Haircell Pattern Per LF $ 85.00 Tie Downs CMTD1 Recessed Floor -Mt 5,000 lb D-Ring Tie -Down (Installed) $ 45.00 CMTD2 Recessed Wall -Mt E-Track (Installed; Steel Frames Only) Per Linear Foot $ 24.00 CMTD3 Surface Wall -Mt E-Track (Installed) $ 13.00 CMTD4 E-Track Adapter Strap. $ 20.00 CMTDS Recessed Floor -Mt E-Track w/ Backer Plate (Installed) Per. Linear Foot $ 22.00 CMTD6 Motorcycle Wheel Chock $ 112.00 CMTD7 Condor Heavy Duty Motorcycle Wheel Chock $ 575.00 Brakes / Axles CMAB1 Electric Brakes w/ Breakaway & Battery (5' & 6' Wide Models Only) $ 470.00 CMAB2 Surge Brake System / Tandem Axle (12,000 lb & 14,000 lb G.V.W.R.) $ 1,810.00 CMAB3 UPG To Torsion Rubber Ride Axle Ea. $ 570.00 Climate Control - Vents CMCL1 15,000 BTU Roof -Mt Air Cond w/ Heat Strip $ 2,130.00 CMCL2 14"x14" Roof Vent w/ Screen $ 85.00 CMCL3 Max -Air Cover (for Open Roof -Vents When Driving) $ 140.00 CMCL4 Plastic Flow Thru Side Wall Vent (Pair) $ 95.00 Generator CMG1 Generator Slide -Out Tray (specify Gen. Dimensions) $ 540.00 CMG2 Generator Ready Package - Insulated Generator Compartment - Generator Door - CO2 Detector $ 780.00 CMG4 7,000-Watt Onan Generator $ 13,500.00 CMGS "Remote Start" for Generator (Specify Location) $ 310.00 CMG6 Auto Transfer Switch for Generator $ 325.00 CMG7 30 Gal. Fuel Cell only (8" & up I-beam) $ 1,610.00 CMG8 6500 Watt Tongue Mount Electric Start Honda Generator Package With ATP Enclosure $ 7,800.00 Electrical - 12 Volt CME121 12-Volt Battery w/ Box (Int or Ext Mounted) $ 370.00 CME122 7.5 Amp Solar Charger For Onboard Battery $ 410.00 CME123 12 VOLT LED/ 110 Volt Pkg With 30 Amp Power Center - Includes - (4) 40" LED Strip Lights, (1) Wall Switch, (2) Interior Wall Receps., (1) Exterior GFI Wall Recep., 30 Amp Motor Base Plug. $ 1,360.00 CME124 12-Volt Interior Dome Light (Additional) $ 31.00 CME125 12-Volt Interior Wall Switch $ 20.00 CME126 12-Volt Exterior Porch Light $ 39.00 CME127 LED Loading Lights $ 225.00 CME128 22" LED Interior - Exterior Flood/ Scene Light $ 360.00 CME129 40" LED Strip Light $ 175.00 CME1210 Strobe Kit Amber or White (Pair) $ 590.00 CME1211 Wire for 12-Volt Options (Stub Wire Only; Specify Location) $ 175.00 CME1212 LED Back Up Lights (Requires LED Pkg) $ 230.00 CME1213 7-Way Plug (Upgrades 4-Way Plug on 5' & 6' Wide Single Axle Models) $ 95.00 CME1214 7 Watt Solar Battery Charger $ 475.00 CMEL1 110 Volt Package W/ 30 Amp Breaker - Requires Finished Ceiling (2 - 4' Florescent Lights - (2) Interioe 120 Volt Wall Receptacles - Exterior GFI Wall Receptacle - 30 Amp Motor Base Plug $ 888.00 CMEL2 30-Amp Breaker Panel $ 270.00 CMEL3 50-Amp Breaker Panel $ 440.00 CMEL4 30- Amp Motor Base Plug $ 240.00 CMELS 50- Amp Motor Base Plug $ 290.00 CMEL6 Upgrade to 50 Amp panel w/Built in 12 Volt Converter $ 425.00 CMEL7 30 AMP Power Cord $ 140.00 CMEL8 50 AMP Power Cord $ 180.00 CMEL9 110-Volt Interior Wall Receptacle (2 Gang) $ 92.00 CMEL10 GFI Wall Receptacle (Interior/Exterior; 2 Gang) $ 122.00 CMEL11 110-Volt Interior Wall Switch $ 80.00 CMEL12 4' Double -Tube Fluorescent Light w/ Diffuser $ 245.00 Tires Upgrades / Spares CMT1 Alum Wheel w/ Center Cap, Ea. $ 200.00 CMT2 Spare Tire w/ 5 or 6 Bolt Silver Wheel $ 220.00 CMT3 ST235/85R16/E Spare Tire w/ 8 Bolt Silver Wheel $ 375.00 CMT4 Spare Tire Mt. (Int Wall Mt; No Cover) $ 90.00 CMTS Spare Tire Carrier w/ Cover (Tongue Mt) $ 115.00 CMT6 Spare Tire Compart - Under Floor (I -Beam Models Only) $ 440.00 Tag/ Title/Admin TXNEWT New Tag (Specify State, County or City) $ 225.00 TXTEMP Temp Tag $ 15.00 DISC 5% Off MSRP ON Manufacturer's Options and Models Not Listed REINITIATION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT STUDY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PRESENTATION Norfolk District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 24 January 2023 Cot er Com n y US Army Corps of Engineers 2 BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT The integrated USACE and Collier County project team requests concurrence from the Board of Commissioners to reinitiate the Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management (CSRM) feasibility study. Study Purpose: Evaluate coastal storm risk and recommend a plan that would manage risk by reducing storm -related economic damage and improving resiliency in Collier County, FL Goals Unique to Study Re -Initiation • Reengage Collier County community to address agency, stakeholder, and public comments and concerns from the first iteration of the study • Reformulate the 2021 Recommended Plan using updated information and lessons learned • Increased public coordination to promote community awareness and cooperation COLLIER COUNTY CSRM FEASIBILITY STUDY: PAST TO PRESENT )riginal Feasibility Study Oct 2018 — Oct 2021 Hurricane Draft Recommended Plan Ian Report Final Report We are here Reinitiated Feasibility Study Aug 2022 —Aug 2025 Signed Chief's Report 3 TSP Draft Report Exemption for Why are we here? 2020 2020 Additional Time Coastal storms present significant risk to the and Funding community and local economic livelihood. Collier Approved County has advocated for a beach study for years, and this study is an opportunity for Collier County to partner with USACE to determine a risk management recommendation. COLLIER COUNTY CSRM FEASIBILITY STUDY: PAST TO PRESENT Event Feasibility Cost Share Agreement signed - 3-year Feasibility 9 October 2018 Study Began Tentatively Selected Plan Milestone March 2020 Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental July 2020 Impact Statement Public Release (45-day comment period) Agency Decision Milestone December 2020 Environmental Compliance Policy Exemption Denied by September 2021 Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of the Army Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental N/A Impact Statement Public Release (30-day review) End of 3-year Feasibility Study October 2021 me and Funding Exemption Request Approved for Edd 2 August 2022 itt onal Three Years and $2.97M; Study Reinitiated The USACE and Collier County team agreed to pursue the time and funding exemption waiver during the final report review process. Therefore, the final report was never publicly released, and the 3-year study was never completed. 5 STUDY BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Study Purpose: This study is an interim response to Section 4033 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114) and the purpose is to formulate and evaluate various alternatives aimed at reducing damage and erosion caused by coastal storms and recommend a plan for congressional authorization. Cost: This study is 100% federally funded. The reinitiated study was approved for $2.97 million. Including the first iteration of the study that ended in October 2021, the total cost of the study will be $5.97 million. Schedule: The reinitiated study was approved for an additional three years and is anticipated for completion in August 2025. Non -Federal Sponsor: Collier County 9 BRIEF 2021 RECOMMENDED PLAN OVERVIEW North County 2021 Recommended Plan: The 2021 recommended plan included beach berm and dune nourishment, structural measures, and nonstructural measures including Critical Infrastructure across six Planning Areas (PAs). • Beach Berm and Dune Nourishment: Approximately 11 miles of beach and dune nourishment in PA I, PA3, and the northern portion of PA4. • Structural Measures: Four floodwalls (with gates), two surge barrier systems, and two jetties at Wiggins Pass in PA1, PA3, and PA5. Approximately 3 9, 100 buildings would have been impacted by these measures. • Nonstructural Measures: Floodproofing and elevations for a total of 778 buildings. Elevations were recommended for residential buildings in PA2, PA4, and PA6. Floodproofing was recommended for commercial buildings and Critical Infrastructure (hospitals, EMS, police, etc.) Barefoot Beach _ (RI-R9) Barefoot Beach County Preserve (R9-R16) Wiggins Pass State Park (R16-R22) Vanderbilt Beach (R22-R29) 2021 RECOMMENDED PLAN - BEACHES Park Shore Beach (R46-R58) Naples Beach (R58-79) All North County study area beaches (Planning Areas 1 — 4) will be reevaluated in the upcoming study effort. NOT included in North County Beaches: Pelican Bay (R29 — R41), Clam Pass Park (R42 - R46), and Gordon Pass Reach (R79 — R89) 8 WHAT WILL BE DIFFERENT THIS TIME? Previous Study Reinitiated Study General concerns with proposed The 2021 Recommended Plan will be structural measures related to their reformulated and reevaluated environmental impacts Concerns with the proposed beach dune and berm nourishment measure not including PA2 and full PA4 The final report, including the draft report agency and public comments with USACE responses, was never released Beach and dune nourishment will How are we be reinvestigated using updated addressing in the reinitiated study? information for all North County beaches (PA1 — PA4) Comments received and their official responses were provided to agencies. Public coordination upcoming COLLIER COUNTY CSRM FEASIBILITY STUDY: PRESENT TO FUTURE Event V V Date Time and Funding Exemption Request Approved for Additional Three Years and $2.97M; Study Reinitiated 2 August 2022 Board of Commissioners Briefing 24 January 2023 Plan Formulation Charrette, Virtual Public Meeting, and In -Person Public NEPA Scoping Meeting TBD —April 2023 Tentatively Selected Plan Milestone October 2023 Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement Public Release (45-day comment period) December 2023 Agency Decision Milestone April 2024 Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement Public Release (30-day comment period) February 2025 Signed Chief's Report — Feasibility Study Completed 2 August 2025 10 COORDINATION EFFORTS Public Engagement • Weekly coordination meetings with Collier County for general project updates and discussion • Briefings to City of Naples on January 30 and City of Marco Island on February 6 to reestablish coordination and provide opportunity for Cities to provide feedback/comments and engage in more direct discussion with USACE team. Additional briefings for other cities/town councils/community stakeholders may be scheduled • Environmental interagency meetings on regular basis o Draft report comments and formal responses were provided back to agencies o Targeted environmental sub -team meetings will occur to address environmental complianc • Virtual Public Meeting anticipated in April 2023 • In -person Plan Formulation Charrette and Public NEPA Scoping Meeting anticipated in April 2 • Interactive story map web tool will be developed Coordination with Other USACE Studies/Proiects • Miami -Dade CSRM Study (Beach) and Miami -Dade Back -Bay CSRM Study • Biscayne Bay and Southeastern Everglades Ecosystem Restoration (BBSEER) Project • Central & South Florida (C&SF) Flood Resiliency Study 11 PUBLIC COMMENT OPTIONS Email: Collier-CSRMgusace.army.mil Project Website and Documents: https://www. saj .usace. aWmil/CollierCountyC SRMFeasibilityS!gdy/ Written Comments: Environmental Analysis Section, Norfolk District 803 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510 For any accessibility issues that prevent written comments, please call (757)201-7218.