The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 01/24/2023 Item #17D (Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No.82-49, the Shadowwood PUD))17.D 01 /24/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 82-49, the Shadowwood Planned Unit Development (PUD), by amending the master plan to add a potential roadway interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane Residential Planned Unit Development to the north which if approved, will replace the roadway connection to Polly Avenue; by adding roadway, signage, and model home deviations and by revising developer commitments. The subject property consisting of 77.99E acres is part of the 168.10E acre PUD located at the Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake - Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (This is a companion to items 17A and 17C) [PL20210001253] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above - referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property consists of 77.99+/- acres and is part of the 168.10-acre PUD located at Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake -Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. This petitioner seeks to amend ShadowWood PUD, approved via Ordinance #82-49, by amending the master plan to add a potential roadway interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane Residential Planned Unit Development to the north which will replace the roadway connection to Polly Avenue, if constructed; by adding roadway, signage, and model home deviations and by revising developer commitments. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Amendment (PUDA) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by Staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject site is identified as an Urban Designation, Urban Mixed - Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. The ±168.1-acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved via Ord. #82-49 and subsequently amended with Ordinance #08-43. As amended, ShadowWood allows a total maximum of 574 residential units at a maximum density of 3.4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) - (574 DUs - 168.1 Acres = 3.415 DU/A = 3.4 DU/A). According to the FLUE, "within the Urban designated areas, a base density of four residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though is not an entitlement." The applicant owns 78 (Tract E) of the 168.1 acres. Although Tract `E' was always intended for residential uses (multi -family), it remains undeveloped to date. In preparation for developing this tract, the petitioner is requesting to modify the Master Plan to add an interconnection from Tract `E' to the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD to the north as well as add deviations and additional developer commitments. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed changes to the Packet Pg. 1242 17.D 01/24/2023 ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD) may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five-year AUIR planning period unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occurs: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses theproject's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the documents provided with this petition there are no additional residential units proposed with this request. There is a revision to the access points including the addition of an interconnection to the proposed companion petition Sandy Lane RPUD-PL20200001208. The TIS provided with the Sandy Lane PUD request indicates there will be +/-38 PM peak hour, two-way trips using this proposed interconnection which connects to Santa Barbara to the west. The +/-38 trips are already included as part of the transportation impacts and development rights for ShadowWood PUD. This request remains consistent with the GMP as no additional transportation impacts are proposed, and there remains capacity on the adjacent arterial and collector roadways within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be inconsistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (COME). The proposed changes do not affect any of the listed species or native vegetation preservation requirements of the GMP; however, the deviation request to not install littoral plantings is not consistent with CCME Policy 6.1.7. (3). It should be noted that during the November 17, 2022, CCPC meeting the applicant provided language amending this deviation and was accepted and approved by staff. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDA-PL20210001253 on November 17, 2022, and by a vote of 4 to 0 recommended to forward this Packet Pg. 1243 17.D 01/24/2023 petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with the required changes to the PUD as explained below. The CCPC approval was unanimous. There is one letter of opposition; however, this person did not attend the meeting. As such, this petition will be placed on Summary Agenda. The required changes and additions to be added to the PUD by the CCPC include: Section V - In Section 5.9.B, adding WING SOUTH AIRPARK to the second line of the disclosure Section VI - Amending Deviation 6 language, "to instead not require a Littoral Shelf Planting Area (LSPA), as defined in LDC Section 3.05.10., but to require two rows of native grasses around the entire perimeter of the stormwater lakes(s) within Tract E at the control elevation The changes were accepted by staff, and these revisions were added to the Ordinance. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing Shadowwood PUD (Ordinance No. 82-49, as amended). The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? Packet Pg. 1244 17.D 01 /24/2023 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC) Packet Pg. 1245 17.D 01/24/2023 RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approves the request for Petition PUDA-PL20210001253, ShadowWood PUD. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report - ShadowWood PUDA (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Revised Ordinance - 1-5-23 (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment B - Back-up Materials (PDF) 4. Attachment C - Hearing Advertising Signs (PDF) 5. legal ad - agenda ID 23684 (PDF) Packet Pg. 1246 17.D 01 /24/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.13 Doc ID: 23684 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 82-49, the Shadowwood Planned Unit Development (PUD), by amending the master plan to add a potential roadway interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane Residential Planned Unit Development to the north which if approved, will replace the roadway connection to Polly Avenue; by adding roadway, signage and model home deviations and by revising developer commitments. The subject property consisting of 77.991: acres is part of the 168.101: acre PUD located at the Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake -Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (This is a companion to items 17B and 17C) [PL20210001253] Meeting Date: 01/24/2023 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 11/22/2022 2:32 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/22/2022 2:32 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 11/22/2022 3:58 PM Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 11/22/2022 5:00 PM Diane Lynch Growth Management Department Completed 12/08/2022 4:16 PM James C French Growth Management Completed 12/09/2022 7:20 PM Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 01/05/2023 3:34 PM Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 01/05/2023 3:53 PM Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 01/11/2023 3:57 PM Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 01/12/2023 6:29 PM Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 01/18/2023 2:55 PM 01 /24/2023 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1247 17.D.1 Coffiev County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20210001253 SHADOWWOOD COMPANION ITEM: PUDZ-PL20200001208 SANDY LANE RPUD PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENTS: Owner/Applicant: Agents: Naples Associates VI, LLLP Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP 1250 Airport Road S Hole Montes, Inc. Naples, FL 34104 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 82-49, as amended, the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 77.99+/- acres and is part of the 168.10-acre PUD located at Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake - Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map, page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petitioner seeks to amend ShadowWood PUD, approved via Ordinance #82-49, by amending the master plan to add a potential roadway interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane Residential Planned Unit Development to the north which if approved, will replace the roadway connection to Polly Avenue; by adding roadway, signage and model home deviations and by revising developer commitments. PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 1 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Gl a Packet Pg. 1248 Xv (Dc <. 0 co D 00 O N) Co C o N O N N V7 O W N v Q O O d a W �s7 - Rattl snake am PROJECT LOCATION Location Map y RD #i oaWLFCLUB PUD US r-FPUD I f f f l PLCSS`rtrj.` B"LES LAKE +•-rcezxxr::<re^_rr �fj pp e L6 He. I mat .a � G�14p 8IElN rl .;L SLCC%s�"t1 w� ��►a�rH� Petition Number: PL20210001253 Zoning Map Packet Pg. 1249 17.D.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Because this petition is amending the ShadowWood PUD Document, this section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the entire ShadowWood PUD area. North: Developed residential, with a current zoning designation of Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD (1.43 DU/AC), which is approved for a golf course and single and multiple family dwelling units. Preserve area, with a current zoning designation of Agriculture. It should be noted that the property to the northwest is the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD (5.62 DU/AC), which will be proposed to have single and multi- family residential. East: Preserve area, with a current zoning designation of LASIP Conservation Area (CFPUD), which is approved for restoration, protection and preservation of native vegetative communities and wildlife habitat, and stormwater management; vacant area with sparse vegetation, with a current zoning designation of Naples Lakes Country Club PUD (1.67 DU/AC), which is approved for single, multifamily, commercial, office, and recreational uses South: Rattlesnake Hammock Road, a six -lane arterial roadway, and then developed multi- family, with a current zoning designation of Lely Resort PUD (3.1 DU/AC), which is approved for single, multi -family, commercial, professional, educational, cultural, recreational, and conservation uses West: Developed residential, with current zoning designations of Residential Multi-Family- 6 District (RMF-6), Residential Single Family-3 District (RSF-3), and Agriculture (A) with an ST overlay Intentionally blank PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 3 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1250 17.D.1 I I i TRACT E i L* t is * %L ir u� L� t;s .. a- x 't Aerial (Prepared by Hole Montes) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land -use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 4 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Q 0 I.L O 2O O V! I M LO N T_ O O O N O N J d 00 W M Q d O O 0 c� L U) O N w U) c aD E M U 2 Q Packet Pg. 1251 17.D.1 Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. The f 168.1-acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved via Ord. #82- 49 and subsequently amended with Ordinance #08-43. As amended, ShadowWood allows a total maximum of 574 residential units at a maximum density of 3.4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) — (574 DUs - 168.1 Acres = 3.415 DU/A = 3.4 DU/A). According to the FLUE, "within the Urban designated areas a base density of four residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though is not an entitlement." The applicant owns 78 (Tract E) of the 168.1 acres. Although Tract `E' was always intended for residential uses (multi -family), it remains undeveloped to date. In preparation for developing this tract, the petitioner is requesting to modify the Master Plan to add an interconnection from Tract `E' to the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD to the north as well as add deviations and additional developer commitments. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed changes to the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD) may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the projece's significant impacts on all roadways. " PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 5 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Gl 0 a 0 0 3 0 U) 0 Q. a� M W c as E c� r a Packet Pg. 1252 17.D.1 Staff finding: According to the documents provided with this petition there are no additional residential units proposed with this request. There is a revision to the access points including the addition of an interconnection to the proposed companion petition Sandy Lane RPUD- PL20200001208. The TIS provided with the Sandy Lane PUD request indicates there will be +/- 38 PM peak hour, two-way trips using this proposed interconnection which connects to Santa Barbara to the west. The +/-38 trips are already included as part of the transportation impacts and development rights for ShadowWood PUD. This request remains consistent with the GMP as no additional transportation impacts are proposed, and there remains capacity on the adjacent arterial and collector roadways within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be inconsistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposed changes do not affect any of the listed species or native vegetation preservation requirements of the GMP; however, the deviation request to not install littoral plantings is not consistent with CCME Policy 6.1.7. (3). STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The proposed PUD changes will not affect any of the preservation requirements of the PUD document; Ordinance 82-49 (amendments Ordinance 2008-43 and Ordinance 20-17). A minimum of 3.8 acres of native vegetation will be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. Landscape Review: The buffer types labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the Land Development Code. The applicant has requested a deviation to allow for no buffer along the portion of the North boundary abutting Sandy Lane PUD if a specific type of unified development is proposed. See deviation 3. PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 6 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1253 17.D.1 Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the areas surrounding the project. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Developer commitments are listed in "SECTION V" of the PUD document under the "5.7 UTILITIES" section. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. Zoning Services Review: In 1982, the property was rezoned from Agriculture District (A-2), Residential Single Family-4 District (RSF-4), and General Commercial District (C-4) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) via Ordinance 82-49 allowing for 569 residential units at a maximum density of 3.6 residential units per gross acre and creating the following five tracts: • Tracts A & E - 113.3 acres of multifamily residential. • Tract B - 3.7 acres of single family. • Tract C - a private air park district encompassing 37.8 acres that allows an airport runway, airport hangars, airport administration building, and other airport accessory uses. • Tract D - 10.3 acres for commercial uses. In 2008, there was a PUD Amendment memorialized via Ordinance 08-43 increasing the acreage for Tract B to 5.68, increasing the acreage for the private air park district to 46.1 acres, and deleting Tract D. The total number of maximum residential units increased to 574 units at a maximum density of 3.4 units per gross acre. In June 2020, there was a PUD Amendment memorialized via Ordinance 20-17 that redesignated 4+/- acres of land from Tract C, private air park district, to Tract E, residential development; by adding the development standards for Tract E; by amending the master plan to add 2 access points to provide ingress and egress to Tract E including access to Polly Avenue and Whitaker Road; by removing a requirement that all access roads to the PUD are private roads; and by revising developer commitments. In November 2021, the petitioner applied to amend the master plan to add a potential roadway interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane Residential Planned Unit Development to the north which will replace the roadway connection to Polly Avenue, if constructed; by adding roadway, signage and model home deviations and by revising developer commitments. Tract E (as depicted on the Master Plan) is ±77.98 acres and located east of Polly Avenue, in the northern portion of the PUD. This PUDA proposes to add a potential interconnection with the Sandy Lane RPUD to the north of Tract E, to clarify and add development commitments, and to add five deviations specific to Tract E. This amendment request will not place an additional burden on the surrounding area, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water and other utilities. This amendment request seeks to modify the Master Plan by adding a potential interconnection with the Sandy Lane RPUD to the north of Tract E. The additional interconnection will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area. The new interconnection will better serve the residents within both the ShadowWood PUD and the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD, as well as the surrounding community. The proposed interconnection will be PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 7 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1254 17.D.1 a resident -only connection and will allow residents of ShadowWood Tract E to access Santa Barbara Blvd through the Sandy Lane RPUD Should the interconnection to the Sandy Lane RPUD be built, the approved connection to Polly Avenue will either be removed or not constructed, reducing traffic into the surrounding community. Policies 7.1-7.3 are further supported with the proposed amendment by providing an interconnection that will allow residents within the ShadowWood PUD to access Santa Barbara Blvd through the Sandy Lane RPUD. The additional potential access to the development to the north will allow for a greater dispersal of traffic and provide motorists within the development more options. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The PUD already receives potable water and wastewater services from the CCWSD. A water distribution main is readily available at Skyway Drive, a wastewater transmission main is readily available along Sunset Boulevard, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed PUD as amended. A private wastewater collection system would also be accessible at Skyway Drive provided an easement were granted by Wing South, Inc., the adjacent property owner. Water and wastewater mains are available within the areas surrounding the project. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Developer commitments are listed in "SECTION V" of the PUD document under the "5.7 UTILITIES" section. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of Tract E of the PUD. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 8 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1255 17.D.1 4. 5. 6. 7. relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on page 5. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report, the buffers labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC. And since deviation 3 only applies in the event that a unified development of single-family dwellings that spans from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane PUD to the North is proposed, staff is of the opinion that the applicant has demonstrated internal and external compatibility. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. No deviation from the required usable open space is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Water and wastewater mains are available within the areas surrounding the project. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Developer commitments are listed in "SECTION V" of the PUD document under the "5.7 UTILITIES" section. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Water and wastewater mains are available within the areas surrounding the project. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Developer commitments are listed in "SECTION V" of the PUD document under the "5.7 UTILITIES" section. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 9 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 i, a Packet Pg. 1256 17.D.1 owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. All future development proposed on the ShadowWood PUD would have to comply to the LDC and other applicable codes. The petitioner is requesting seven additional deviations to the LDC. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.17 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the (FLUM) and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is currently zoned PUD and would remain as such. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. This petition does not propose any change to the boundaries of the PUD. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary; however, it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to include the access points, proposed uses and development standards that are specific to the subject parcel. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 10 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 i, a Packet Pg. 1257 17.D.1 The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create adverse drainage impacts in the area; provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project are addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The amending of the master plan to add a potential roadway interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane Residential Planned Unit Development to the north which will replace the roadway connection to Polly Avenue, if constructed; by adding roadway, signage and model home deviations and by revising developer commitments is not anticipated to serve as a deterrent to the improvement of the adjacent property. PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 11 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1258 17.D.1 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed uses cannot be achieved without amending the PUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff s opinion that the proposed uses, associated development standards, and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 12 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1259 17.D.1 of the rezoning process, and staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) will be minimized. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. It is to be determined at the public hearings DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The PUD was approved via Ordinance 82-49 without any deviations whereas Ordinance 20-17 approved Deviation #1 of the PUD document. The petitioner is now seeking seven additional deviations that are specific to Tract E. The new proposed deviations has been directly extracted from the proposed PUD ordinance. The petitioner's justification and staff analysis/recommendation for this deviation are listed below. Deviation #1: (Buffer Requirements) — Was previously approved by Ordinance 2020-17. Slight modification that strikes the "applicability of buffer requirements," language. Staff has no issue with this strikethrough. Deviation #2: (Right -of -Way) "Deviation # 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.0l.N, which requires a minimum 60-foot right-of- way width for local roads, to allow that private roadways shall have a minimum 50-foot right-of-way width per Exhibit C-1, Tract E, Cross Section." Petitioners Justification: This deviation has been granted for many projects where the roads will remain private. There is adequate width in a SO foot right-of-way for a private, local road to allow for all necessary utilities, sidewalks, and travel lanes. A cross-section has been provided in support of this deviation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.13.51, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation #3: (Buffer Requirements) "Deviation # 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, Table 2.4, which requires each property to provide a buffer, to allow for no landscape buffer between Shadowwood PUD Tract E and the development to the north, provided the properties have a roadway connection as shown on the Master Plan and are developed by the same developer as a unified development, entirely with single-family dwellings, submitted under one PPL. PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 13 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Gl a Packet Pg. 1260 Petitioners Justification: If Shadowwood PUD Tract E and the development to the north (proposed Sandy Lane RPUD) are developed as one continuous development, there is no potential incompatibility between the sites as they will be part of one, unified development with consistent architecture and landscaping. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation #4: (Model Homes) "Deviation # 4 requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.04.04.B.5.c., which provides that a maximum of five model homes, or a number corresponding to ten percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted, approved development, shall be permitted prior to final plat approval, to allow for up to 16 model homes and a sales center to be permitted in Tract E of the RPUD. Each time the developer applies for a model building permit, it shall be required to inform the County how many model homes have been permitted." Petitioners Justification: The experience of the developer is that given the maximum number of dwelling units and the variety of housing types, a larger number of model homes is supported. This has been approved for a number of PUDs. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation #5A: (On Premise Directional Sign) "Deviation # 5A requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.06.02.B.5.a On Premise Directional Sign, which allows on -premises directional signs be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of roadway, paved surface, or back of curb, to allow a setback of five feet from a roadway or platted easement, excluding public roadways, providing it does not result in public safety concerns or obscure visibility of the motoring traffic, as determined by the County Manager or designee. Petitioners Justification: This deviation will allow flexibility in locating the directional signs to be sure that they are clearly visible while maintaining public safety. PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 14 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 EI a Packet Pg. 1261 17.D.1 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation #513: (On Premise Directional Sign) "Deviation # 5B requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.06.02.B.5.c.i On Premise Directional Sign, which allows one on -premise directional sign with a maximum area of 24 square feet and a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow all directional signs to a maximum area of 24 square feet and maximum height of 8 feet." Petitioners Justification: The PUD will be comprised of a number of sub -communities and this deviation will allow residents and guests to more easily navigate the neighborhood. The signs will only be visible to residents and visitors to the community. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is CD approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, N finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that a "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.13.51, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviationco is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Q 0 Deviation 6: (Littoral Shelf Planting Area) "Deviation # 6 requests relief from LDC Sec. 3.05.10 Littoral Shelf Planting Area (LSPA), Paragraph 0 0 3 A.l.b. which requires that 7 percent of the total area of a lake, measured at the control elevation, be 0 provided as LSPA, to instead allow 0 percent. Petitioners Justification: Shadowwood Tract E is located to the west of the Wing South Airpark, a L private runway. While not an airport and not subject to the Airport Authority or the FAA, the applicant has been approached by members of Wing South Airpark requesting that littoral areas be avoided if a00 W possible to reduce the risk of attracting wildlife, specifically birds, to the air strip. This is consistent with the guidance of LDC Sec. 4.02.06, Standards for Development within the Airport Overlay (APO), y Paragraph N. Airport land use restrictions, subparagraph 7, which is specific to landfills but specifies c that "The landfill operator must incorporate bird management techniques or other practices to E minimize bird hazards to airborne aircraft. "It is also consistent with technical guidance from the FAA ("Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports, A Manual for Airport Personnel, " July 2005) and the a USDA ("Wildlife at Airports, " Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series, February 2017). As stated in the FAA Advisory Circular Sec. 2.3.2, in order "to facilitate the control of hazardous wildlife, the FAA recommends the use of steep -sided, rip -rap or concrete lined, narrow, linear -shaped PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 15 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1262 17.D.1 water detention basins. " and `All vegetation in or around detention basins that provide food or cover for hazardous wildlife should be eliminated. " Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Environmental staff recommends the DENIAL of the deviation request. The applicant has requested to reduce the required littoral planting area required by LDC Section 3.05.10.A.1.b. from seven percent to zero percent littoral plantings. Littoral plantings are a beneficial component for stormwater management systems that aid in the improvement of water quality by trapping sediment and absorbing excess nutrients. The applicant has not provided evidence to support a claim that removal of the required littoral plantings from the stormwater ponds will reduce wildlife (birds) from the area. The technical guidance from the FAA does establish standards for reducing wildlife conflicts for aircraft. However, the location of the airstrip adjacent to conservation areas to the east make it improbable that reducing the littoral requirement will result in a significant reduction in wildlife presences in relation to the airstrip. Additionally, a reduction in the required littoral planting area is not consistent with the Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) of Growth Management Plan, specifically Policy 6.1.7 (1) which states; "Wet detention ponds within the Urban Designated area shall have a littoral shelf with an area equal to 2.5 % of the ponds surface area measured at the control elevation and be planted with native aquatic vegetation. Therefore, ES Staff does not support the deviation request to allow the construction of stormwater ponds without the installation of littoral plants. Deviation 7: (Dead End Streets) "Deviation # 7 requests relief from LDC Section 6.06.01 Street System Requirements, Paragraph J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to instead allow dead -ends on internal roadways provided the dead-end portion of the street does not exceed 150 feet." Petitioners Justification: Only a small number of lots will be accessed from the internal dead-end roadways, and a full cul-de-sac is not necessary in order to provide safe access to these lots or to protect public health, safety, and welfare. The project must still comply with the Fire Code, and turnaround sufficient for the turn radius of emergency vehicles is being provided. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." APRIL 20, 2022 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on April 20, 2022, at New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall — Room 211, located at 7675 Davis Boulevard, in Naples. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at 6:30 p.m. The applicant's agent explained the request for PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 16 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1263 17.D.1 the proposed rezone and that a second NIM was needed as the developer is adding seven parcels into the PUD and the ShadowWood PUD to the south is proposing to interconnect into the Sandy Lane PUD. The agent explained that this second NIM for Sandy Lane would also stand as the official NIM for the Shadow Wood PUDA as they are companion petitions. Paula McMichael, the agent, gave a PowerPoint presentation. She explained that Sandy Lane PUD is 640 units and ShadowWood PUD would provide an interconnection into the proposed Sandy Lane PUD. She then opened the meeting to the public which had the following concerns: deviations for ShadowWood, wildlife, any change in the type of homes being offered, powerlines abutting Sandy Lane, dirt road near the Boys and Girls Club, the clearing of Tract E in ShadowWood, barriers for the Sandy Lane development, any possibility that the developer would not build single family homes, the square footage and how large the lots are, ingress/egress points, the possibility of moving the recreation center closer to Santa Barbara Blvd, proposed density, number of homes, zero lot lines, chain -link or masonry wall near the runway in ShadowWood, Tract E detailed plan, berm and wall for east side of Tract E and south of Tract E in ShadowWood, blasting from Taormina, animals, the airpark, and the main entrance at Country Crews Rd. The agent and her team had answered and addressed all concerns at the meeting. Paula McMichael had said that the deviations for ShadowWood are for a public roadway, signs, buffers, and a model home. Shane Johnson of Passarella and Associates explained that any nesting of birds will be dealt with prior to construction and the deer would need to find another place to forage. In regard to ShadowWood — Tract E, Paula said that this was already approved for 364 residential units and is intended for single family homes and been approved for vegetative clearance. GL homes had explained that most traffic would exit through Sandy Lane via Whitaker and onto Santa Barbara Blvd. Paula also explained that the developer could build multifamily but as of now its single family. GL homes did not know the square footage or how large the lots will be and further explained that the recreation center would not move from its proposed location and that it was strategically located closer to ShadowWood and in the middle of the Sandy Lane RPUD. GL Homes said that the homes will range from 400 to 600 thousand. In regard to blasting, this will be commenced per County ordinances and that people will be notified when blasting occurs. A commitment occurred for ShadowWood which was the developer will install a 6-foot-high wall on top of a 4-foot-high berm within the landscape buffer along the eastern and southern boundaries of Tract E adjacent to Wing South Airpark to buffer the homes in Tract E from noise, odors, dust, and other airport -related conditions associated with airpark operations. This commitment was added to the Ordinance for this petition Section 5.9.C. Another commitment also occurred for Sandy Lane RPUD which GL Homes had committed to constructing single family detached units only along the eastern border of the proposed Sandy Lane PUD. This commitment was added to the Ordinance for the Sandy Lane RPUD petition to Exhibit C — Master Plan, note 3, This Tract will be developed as single family detached units only. The NIM summary, PowerPoint presentation, and sign -in sheet are included in the CCPC backup materials. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is requesting a deviation to allow storm water ponds to be constructed without the planting of littoral plants as required by LDC PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 17 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Packet Pg. 1264 17.D.1 Section 3.05.10. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on October 20, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval but not Deviation 6 for zero littoral plants. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) Application/Backup Materials PUDA-PL20210001253; ShadowWood Page 18 of 18 Revised: October 20, 2022 Gl Q Packet Pg. 1265 17.D.2 ORDINANCE NO.2023- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-49, AS AMENDED, THE SHADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN TO ADD A POTENTIAL ROADWAY INTERCONNECTION FROM TRACT E TO THE PROPOSED SANDY LANE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH WHICH IF APPROVED, WILL REPLACE THE ROADWAY CONNECTION TO POLLY AVENUE; BY ADDING ROADWAY, SIGNAGE AND MODEL HOME DEVIATIONS AND BY REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 77.99f ACRES IS PART OF THE 168.10± ACRE PUD LOCATED AT THE WING SOUTH AIR PARK, EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD BETWEEN DAVIS BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD, IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20210001253] WHEREAS, on July 13, 1982, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 82-49, which created the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development ("MPUD"); and WHEREAS, the PUD was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 08-43 and Ordinance No. 20-17; and WHEREAS, Naples Associates VI, LLLP, represented by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP and Paula N.C. McMichael, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 82-49, as amended, is hereby amended in accordance with the revised PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein. [21-CPS-02169/1762547/11116 ShadowWood PUDA \ PL20210001253 Pagel of 2 1/4/23 Packet Pg. 1266 17.D.2 SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - PUD Document [21-CPS-02169/1762547/1 ] 116 ShadowWood PUDA \ PL20210001253 Page 2 of 2 1 /4/23 2023. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Rick LoCastro, Chairman Packet Pg. 1267 17.D.2 SHADOW WOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Located in Section 16 Township 50 South, Range 26 East PREPARED BY: WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. 1383 Airport Road North Naples, FL 33924 REVISED BY: Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES 2800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REVISED BY: HAGAN ENGINEERING' 1250 N. Tamiami Trail, Ste. 203B Naples, FL 34102 REVISED BY: HOLE MONTES, INC. 950 Encore WU Naples, FL 34110 Page 1 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words smuek Mooeugh are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1268 17.D.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION 11 STATEMENT OF INTENT SECTION III PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TRACTS A & E MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACT B - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACT C - PRIVATE AIR PARK DISTRICT SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS SECTION V1 DEVIATIONS Page 2 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words smmek tltreug4 are deletions H12021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx PAGE 4-422_3 34 45 36-13 14-4-718 4-919 Q a 0 0 3 0 0 t Cn M Ln N 0 0 0 N 0 N J d v 0 0 M Packet Pg. 1269 17.D.2 SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of The Rookery, Ltd., 706 5th Avenue South, Naples, Florida to develop ±168.1 acres of land located in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this proposal development shall hence forth be known as ShadowWood. The development of ShadowWood as a Planned Unit Development will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The residential development with associated recreational and private aviational facilities will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and other applicable documents for the following reasons. The subject property has the necessary rating points to determine availability of adequate community facilities and services. 2. The project development is compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. 3. The subject property will provide a vegetative buffer between the property and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the surrounding vacant lands, and the single-family residential units to the west. 4. The development shall consist primarily of multi -family residential clusters and shall thereby provide more common open space. 5. The development shall utilize natural systems for water management such as the cypress, willow, lower wetland areas, and natural drainage courses. 6. The development shall promote the maintenance of the residential neighborhood and be aesthetically pleasing and functionally efficient. 7. The number of egress and ingress points shall be limited to minimize the impact upon the traffic flow along Rattlesnake Hammock Road. 8. The development is complementary to and consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. 9. The land may be used more efficiently and made more desirable resulting in a smaller network of utilities and streets with consequent lower construction and future maintenance costs. Page 3 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words sowehkremgl4 are deletions H12021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1270 17.D.2 10. Through proper planning and good uniform development control, the development shall protect property values and meet the general public welfare and safety of the citizens of Collier County. 11. The project will enable and encourage compatibility with the natural amenities of the environmental as well as preserve and enhance present advantages. 12. The application of the development plan will permit flexibility and feature amenities and excellence in the form of variations in siting, mixed land uses and varied dwelling types, as well as adaptation to and conservation of the topography and other natural characteristics of the land. 13. With proper uniform quality large scale development, the project may best serve the public interest with alternate mixed land uses. Page 4 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words smuek tlpomg�4 are deletions HA\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 12T,71 17.D.2 SECTION 11 STATEMENT OF INTENT It is the property owner's intention to continue the development of a single and multi -family residential project with recreational, commercial, and aviational facilities, and other support facilities required of a development surrounding a private air park community. The project was initiated in the early 1970's with the development of single-family residential condominium lots with common facilities. As part of the same property, it is the intent of The Rookery, Ltd. to continue to develop a condominium complex consisting of cluster villages; multi -family residential units; single family residential lots; and varied dwelling unit types. The units shall be centered around major points such as the air park, lakes, pine and cypress trees, common open space, and areas of unique vegetation. There may be recreational benefits consisting of jogging trails, para courses, private swimming pools, neighborhood parks, tennis courts, and the unique feature of a private airpark. Residents of this project shall be afforded the opportunity to own private airplanes and a single family residential or condominium unit with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and commercial services among a natural scenic environmental setting. The residential development of low-rise multi -family and single family units shall demonstrate a quality way of life for its residents that will be eminently desirable, esthetically pleasing, and environmentally sound. Page 5 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words stpuekc Areugh are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1272 17.D.2 SECTION III PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3.1. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP: The subject property is currently under the control of The Rookery, Ltd.706 5th Avenue South, Naples. Florida 33940. 3.2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The subject property is described as follows: The east '/2 of the east '/2 and; the north '/2 of the northwest '/4 of the northeast '/4; the southeast '/4 of the northwest '/4 of the northeast '/4 and; all being in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. ALSO LESS the south fifty (50) feet for road right-of-way and any easement right-of-way of public record. LESS WING SOUTH AIR PARK PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT 1, a Condominium, according to the Declaration of Condominium recorded in Official Record Book 476, pages 304 to 305, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as amended. Page 6 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words Hugh are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1273 17.D.2 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4.1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for development of the property identified on the Master Development Plan. It is the intent of the project sponsor to develop multi -family and single-family residences in a low profile silhouette with ample common open space associated with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and commercial services. 4.2. PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS: For the purposes of gross residential land use area, the subject property is f 168.1 acres. The project plan including street layout and land uses is illustrated in Exhibit "B", PUD Master Plan. The project shall consist of four land use tracts of general area and configuration as shown in Exhibit "B". Tracts A & E Residential t117.65 Acres Tract B — Single Family Residential ± 5.68 Acres Tract C — Private Air Park District ± 41.78 Acres Entrance Drive f 3.0 Acres Total Area f 168.1 Acres Assuming favorable economic and market conditions, it is the project sponsor's intent to complete development of the property within six years. The total maximum residential units will be 574 units at a maximum density of 3.4 units per gross acre. 4.3 TRACTS A & E RESIDENTIAL A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to indicate the land regulations for the areas designated on PUD Master Plan as Tracts A and E, Residential. B. Tract A - Permitted Uses and Structures: No buildings or structures, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Multi -Family Residences. Page 7 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words si4we% Aoe etegkr are deletions H:\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1274 17.D.2 b. Common open space, recreational facilities and water management facilities. C. Nine hole golf course with the typical facilities of a private country Club. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a. Customary accessory uses and structures. b. Signs as permitted at time of permit application. C. Airplane hangars and tie downs. d. Private road, pedestrian and bicycle paths, boardwalks and cross- walks, jogging and nature appreciation trails, or other similar facilities constructed for purposes of access to or passage through the common areas. e. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage. C. Tract E - Permitted Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Single family detached dwellings; b. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; C. Two-family and duplex dwellings, d. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence; e. Multi -family dwellings; f. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. 2. Accessory Uses: Page 8 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words sirmek fhFeWh are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Q 0 D IL 0 0 3 0 z Cn M LO N_ O 0 o_ N O N J IL w to M N Packet Pg. 1275 17. D.2 Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: a. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; b. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; C. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. D. Tracts A and E - Maximum Dwelling Units: A maximum of 558 residential dwelling units. E. Tract A — Minimum Yard Requirements for Principal Structures: 1. Depth from property boundary line (35) feet. 2. Depth from edge of all private paved roads (25) feet. 3. Minimum distance between any two (2) principal structures on the same parcel shall be fifteen (15) feet. 4. Minimum distance between a development phase, or condo - minimum tract line and any principal structure shall be seven and one-half (7.5) feet. F. Tract A- Minimum yard Requirements for Accessory Structures: As required by the Collier County Zoning Ordinance. G. Tract A - Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures: 900 Square feet for each dwelling unit. H. Tract A- Maximum Height of Principal Structure: Three (3) living stories above one story of parking with a maximum height of forty-five (45) feet. In order to comply with the minimum flood elevation requirements, the maximum height of a structure shall be measured from the minimum base flood elevation required by the Flood Elevation Ordinance. Tract E Development Standards: Page 9 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words so-uelegk are deletions H12021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1276 17.D.2 TABLE I TRACT E RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE- SINGLE- TOWNHOMES MULTI- AMENITIES FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY (6) DETACHED ATTACHED DWELLING & SINGLE- FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Min. Lot Area 1,600 sf 1.600 sf 1,100 SF 1 acre N/A Min. I_,ot Width 32' 32' 18' 150, N/A Min. Front Yard 12' (1) 12' (1) 17' (1) 20' or''/2 BH, 15' 23'(5) 23' (5) whichever is greater Min. Side Yard 5' (2) 0' or 10' (2) 0' or 5' (2)(4) % BH (4) 5' or `/z BH, whichever is greater Min. Rear Yard 5' or 20'from 5' or 20'from 5' or 20'from 15' or'h BH, 5' or % BH, alley (3) alley (3) alley (3) whichever is whichever is greater greater Min. Distance 10, 10, 10, '/2 SBH % SBH between structures Max. Zoned 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' Bldg. Height Min. Floor Area 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 900 sf 900 sf N/A Max. Actual 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' Bldg. Height Preserve Setback 2.5' 25' 25' 25' 25' ACCESSORY S'I'RIJCTIJRES Min. front Yard SPS SPS SPS SPS 12' Min. Side Yard SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Min. Rear Yard 5' f2j SPS 7 SPS L7 5' SPS Preserve Setback 10, 10, 10, 10, 10' Max. Zoned SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Bldg. Height Max. Actual SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Bldg. Height SPS: Same as Principal Structure BH: Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights N/A; Not Applicable Page 10 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words s'u� are deletions H:\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1277 17.D.2 Notes: (1): Front yard setbacks shall be measured from Right -of -Way line and shall allow a 2-foot separation from the structure to the Public Utility Easement. (2): If side yard setback is 0 feet on one side, the other side yard shall be 10 feet for a total building separation of 10 feet. (3): Alley setbacks shall be measured from the easement line. Parking may be accessed from alleys at the rear of the property provided there is a 5-foot clearance from the vehicle to the edge of the pavement. (4): Multi -family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1, below. (5): Garages shall be located at minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk, except for side load garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth shall be provided to avoid vehicles from being parked across a portion or all of the referenced sidewalk. (6): Amenities must maintain a 100-foot (100') separation from all external boundaries of Tract E. (7): For lots whose rear lot lines abut a lake or water management tract open space tract or buffer tract, the minimum rear setback for a screen enclosure shall be 0 ft. and the minimum rear setback for a pool shall be 3 ft. PROPERTY 15 ' MIN. -- LINE SETBACKEnn7i I I Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks Page 11 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words stpuek-tkreugk are deletions HA2021 \2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1278 17.D.2 J. Minimum Off -Street Parking: Two (2) parking spaces per residential unit with a minimum of 1.5 parking spaces/unit paved and .5 parking space/unit reserved for paving at a time deemed to be appropriate by the County. K. Limitation On Signs: As permitted by the zoning ordinance in effect at time of application for building permit or as permitted by deviations in Section VI. 4.4. TRACT B: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to set forth the development plan and land regulations for the areas designated on PUD Master Plan as Tract B, Single Family Residential. B. Permitted Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Single Family Residences. b. Common open space & water management facilities. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a. Customary accessory uses and structures. b. Recreational uses and facilities. C. Airplane hangars or tie downs. C. Maximum Dwelling Units: A maximum of 16 residential dwelling units may be constructed. D. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard - 25 feet 2. Side Yard- 7.5 feet 3. Rear Yard - 25 feet 4. Accessory structure as required by current zoning ordinance. E. Minimum Lot Width: 100 feet. F. Minimum Lot Area: 12,000 square feet. Page 12 of 22 Words underlined are additions, words gmuek h4o;eWh are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1279 17.D.2 G. Minimum floor Area of Principal Structure: 1,200 square feet exclusive of patio, garage, and/or airplane hanger. H. Maximum Height of Principal Structures: Three (3) stories above the finish grade of lot or from the minimum base flood elevation required by the flood elevation ordinance. Off -Street Parking Requirements: Two (2) spaces, at least one of which shall be located within the permitted building area. J. Landscaping and Buffer: All buildings, enclosures, or other structures constructed for purposes of maintenance, shall have appropriate screening and landscaping. 4.5. TRACT C: PRIVATE AIR PARK DISTRICT: A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to indicate the development plan and land regulations for the areas designated on the PUD Master Plan as Tract "C", Private Air Park District. B. Development Plan: 1. The primary purpose of this Tract will be to provide the necessary aviational support facilities to accommodate a private airport. These areas shall be utilized only in accordance with the provisions necessary to maintain and operate the private air park. 2. Except in areas to be used for water impoundment and principal or accessory use areas, all natural trees and other vegetation as buffer shall be protected and preserved so long as such plant life shall not interfere with the control of airspace within 700 feet from the end of the primary runway surface. Page 13 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words stPtel 64oceugh are deletions HA2021 \2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1280 17.D.2 C. Uses Permitted: No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Pennitted Principal Uses and Structures: Qp M IL a. Airport runway and administration building. c 0 b. Airport hangers, T-hangers, and Airplane tie downs. 3 0 c. Aviational fueling and service shop. s Cn d. Aviational maintenance and service shop. LO N O e. Water management facilities. c N f. Any other similar aviational support facilities that may be necessary or N compatible with the operations of a.private air park. a qe w 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: M N a. Accessory uses customarily associated with the uses permitted in this N district. LO b. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage. c. Signs as permitted at time of permit application. D. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Setback from edge of primary runway surface - 100 feet. 2. Other structures must conform with setbacks of the abutting properties land use regulations; however, they may not be placed within fifty (50) feet of the primary runway surface. E. Control of Airspace: The control of the airspace within 700 feet from the ends of the primary runway surface shall be adhered to by the project sponsor. The control shall be of such a nature as to prevent any airport hazards from being grown, erected, or otherwise placed within a glide path of 20:1 from the ends of the primary runway surface. Page 14 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words smue%tkoez are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1281 17.D.2 SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for development of the project 5.2 PUD MASTER PLAN: A. The PUD Master Plan is an illustrative preliminary development plan. B. The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood as flexible so that, the final design may satisfy the project and comply with all applicable requirements. C. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. D. Minor design changes shall be permitted subject to staff approval. E. Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structure, locations of all improved facilities, and location and treatment of buffer areas. F. Areas illustrated as "lakes" shall be constructed lakes, or upon approval, parts thereof may be green areas in which as much natural foliage as practical shall be preserved. Such areas, lakes and/or natural green areas, shall be of general area and configuration as shown on the Master Plan. G. Wetland subzones "A-1, A-2, A-3, C-1, E-1 and E-2" (Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soli & Peek, Inc. Drawing File No. RZ-59, Sheet 2 of 2), are illustrative sub zones and will be conserved as much as practicable as storm water management/open space areas. These areas will be flagged for protection, prior to development. These areas have been amended by PMC-PL20210000383 as to Tract E on the Master Plan into one preserve totaling 2 acres and located along) the western boundary as depicted on the Master Plan. H. Tract E access will be limited to one connection at Polly Avenue and one connection at Whitaker Road. However, the connection at Polly Avenue will not be constructed or will be removed and terminated should the potential interconnection to the development to the north become available. 5.43. WATER MANAGEMENT: A. Detailed water management construction plans shall be submitted to and approved Page 15 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words so-mek Apewgk are deletions HA2021\2021015\wP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx. Packet Pg. 1282 17.D.2 by the County Engineer prior to commencement of any construction. B. Appropriate easements to be granted to Collier County for maintenance of perimeter swale system. C. Any physical improvements that directly impact the components of the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Program (LASIP) will comply with the LASIP permit and will not adversely impact flow/conveyance. 5.-54. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: Such arrangement and agreements as necessary shall be made with an approved solid waste disposal service to provide for solid waste collection service to all areas of the project. 5.65. RECREATION FACILITIES: A minimum of two swimming pools and one tennis/ball court shall be constructed by the project sponsor. Additional recreational facilities may be constructed by the future residents of this project. 5.-76. TRAFFIC: A. The project sponsor will provide to the appropriate governmental agency, an additional right-of-way of 17.5 feet along the south property boundary line for future road widening of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. B. The project sponsor agrees to construct a right and left turn storage lane on Rattlesnake Hammock Road for traffic entering ShadowWood and to pay for his proportionate share of the costs of a traffic signal at the project entrance when required by the appropriate governmental agency. C. A sidewalk shall be constructed on one side of the main entrance road into the project. D. The maximum total trip generation for Tract E shall not exceed 187 two-way PM peak hour trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. E. Prior to developer turnover to a homeowner's or condominium association, the developer shall pay to County up to $60,000 for the County's design costs for traffic calming initiated by the owner's under the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program and County's installation costs, or up to $60,000 for County - initiated traffic calming including but not limited to striping, signage and speed tables on any of the roadways used to access Santa Barbara. This commitment will terminate upon issuance of the 273rd certificate of occupancy for Tract E if no traffic calming measures have been initiated by owners in the neighborhood or by County. Page 16 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words strttekthreWh are deletions HA2021\2021015MP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1283 17.D.2 F. Should the potential roadway interconnection to the development to the north as shown on the Master Plan be utilized, the owner, its successors or assigns of this PUD will pay the fair share cost of signalization and intersection improvements on Santa Barbara Boulevard, if warranted. The fair share payment will be made at time of request by Collier County. If a traffic signal is not warranted, as determined by Collier County Transportation's staff, the owner's obligation for its proportionate fair share of the cost of the traffic signal shall end upon the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy submitted by the developer or its successor. 5.?. UTILITIES: A. A central water supply system shall be made available to all areas of the project. The water supply source for the project shall be the County system. B. All areas of the project shall be served by a central wastewater collection system and by an existing off -site wastewater treatment plant. The existing plant shall be expanded as may be needed to meet the anticipated demands. Plans and DEP permit applications for the sewage treatment plant shall be submitted to the Utility Division. C. The project sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable County laws and ordinances governing utility provisions and facilities. D. Telephone, power and T.V. cable service shall be made available to all residential areas. All such utility lines shall be installed underground. E. The developer of Tract E shall provide water main stub -outs at any project vehicular connection to the public roadway system and to the PUD boundary to the north at the potential roadway interconnection shown on the Master Plan. The required stub -outs shall be a minimum size of 8 inches, and shall be located within the platted road right-of-way, and shall be established within a County Utility Easement (CUE) to be dedicated to the Collier County Water -Sewer District (District). The CUEs shall be shown on any final subdivision plat and shall be conveyed in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance ( Ord. 04-31 as amended) at no cost to the County or District, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, prior to or concurrent with preliminary acceptance of utilities. 5.98. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. A listed species survey shall be included in submittal materials associated with the next occurring development order request (i.e.: PPL or SDP) for Tract E. The required survey must be less than 12 months old for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those found on site (LDC 3.04.00). The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Page 17 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words sirueklh?eug# are deletions HA2021 \2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1284 17.D.2 5.4-09 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REQUIREMENTS: A. The development of Tract E will be done so as to have no impact on the taxiway or runway uses in Tract C of the PUD. B. Future residents in Tract E will be notified of the existing airpark operations and associated noise issues prior to purchase in written form. Specifically, the homeowners association documents for Tract E will contain the following disclosure in bold print: WING SOUTH AIRPARK. It is disclosed to each Owner of a Lot in the Community that the Communily is adjacent to WING SOUTH AIRPARK, an existing airpark with operations nearby. The airpark may operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and Owners of Lots in the Community may b�ject to noise, odors, dust and other airport related conditions. Declarant does not represent, warrant or guarantee whatsoever how and to what extent the air traffic noise, odors, dust, other airport related conditions and/or the operation of the airpark will affect the Community and/or the use and enjoyment thereof, and Declarant shall have absolutely no liability whatsoever therefor. The homeowners association documents will be recorded in the public records of Collier County prior to the recording of the first plat for Tract E and prior to the closing of the first home in Tract E. Each purchase contract for a home in Tract E must include a disclosure in substantially the same form as the disclosure in the homeowners association documents, and the deed conveying title to the purchaser of each home in Tract E must state that the conveyance is subject to the homeowners association documents for the community. C. . The developer will install a 6-foot high wall on top of a 4-foot high berm within the landscape buffer along the eastern and southern boundaries of Tract E adjacent to Wing South Airpark to buffer the homes in Tract E from noise, odors, dust, and other airport -related conditions associated with airpark operations. 5.10 PUD MONITORING A. One entity_(hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring, as it relates to the development of Tract E, until close-out of the PUD, and this entity_ shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments related to Tract E until close-out of the RPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Naples Associates VI, LLLP. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the RPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved Page 18 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words sttwek Area. are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-2021 000 1253) (11-18-2022).docx. Q 0 a 0 0 3 0 s M N O 0 0 N 0 N J a w to M N M N W a Packet Pg. 1285 17.D.2 of its responsibility under this Section. When the RPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a countv does not in any create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the counjy for Q issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a a violation of state or federal law. -0 0 0 C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of � the development. 0 o Page 19 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words smuek ApAeegkr are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx- CU M LO N O O O r N O N J IL v CO c� M N M N A Ei C E L V fC r r Q r-+ C d E L V R a Packet Pg. 1286 17.D.2 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.A., , which requires a landscape buffer along the eastern PUD boundary associated with the private airstrip to allow no buffer. Given the adjacent, offsite preserve abutting the easterly PUD boundary, no landscape buffer is required. DEVIATIONS 2-6 SPECIFIC TO TRACT E Deviation # 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.0 LN, which requires a minimum 60-foot right-of-way width for local roads, to allow that private roadways shall have a minimum 50-foot right -of -wad per Exhibit C-1, Tract E, Cross Section. Deviation # 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, Table 2.4, which requires each property to provide a buffer, to allow for no landscape buffer between Shadowwood PUD Tract E and the development to the north, provided the properties have a roadway connection as shown on the Master Plan and are developed by the same developer as a unified development, entirely with single- family dwellings, submitted under one PPL. Deviation # 4 requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.04.04.B.5.c., which provides that a maximum of five model homes, or a number correspondingto o ten percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted, approved development, shall be permitted prior to final plat approval, to allow for up to 16 model homes and a sales center to be permitted in Tract E of the RPUD. Each time the developer applies for a model building permit, it shall be required to inform the County how many model homes have been permitted. Deviation # 5A requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.06.02.B.5.a On Premise Directional Sign, which allows on -premises directional signs be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of roadway, paved surface, or back of curb, to allow a setback of five feet from a roadwayplatted easement, excluding_ public roadways, providing it does not result in public safety concerns or obscure visibility of the motoring traffic, as determined by the County Manager or designee. Deviation # 5B requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.06.02.B.5.c.i On Premise Directional Sign, which allows one on -premise directional sign with a maximum area of 24 square feet and a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow all directional signs to a maximum area of 24 square feet and maximum height of 8 feet. Deviation # 6 requests relief from LDC Sec. 3.05.10 Littoral Shelf Planting Area (LSPA), Paragraph A.l.b. which requires that 7 percent of the total area of a lake, measured at the control elevation, be provided as LSPA, to instead not require a LSPA, as defined in Section 3.05.1 Q., but to require two rows of native grasses around the entire perimeter of the stormwater. lake(s) within Tract E at the control elevation. Deviation # 7 requests relief from LDC Section 6.06.01 Street System Requirements, Paragraph J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to instead allow dead -ends on internal roadways provided the dead-end portion of the street does not exceed 150 feet. Page 20 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words ..'--.�� are deletions HA2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx. Q 0 a 0 0 3 0 z Cn M LO N O O 0 N O N J IL le w to M N M N W �71 c m E Q c d E z a Packet Pg. 1287 17.D.2 PUD DWATERFORD Z ESTATES —1 D CD D a) OJ a v � A o ym mT rn A 0 RPUD ONYX NORTH PROPOSED © SANDY LANE RPUD 0 800 A 10' MIN. TYPE 'A* FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE'B' FOR MF SCALE IN FEET POTENTIAL INTERCONNECTION ---fA 11-1 3 A 10' MIN. TYPE'Ir 4 BUFFER U _ PUD NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB 10' MIN. TYPE 'A' FOR SF 16 MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF LANDSCAPE BUFFER SUBJECT g TO CONDITION 5.9.C. SUBJECT TOI"o�,E� TRACT E CONDITION 5.2.H. I I (TBD.SOPIPPL) 2 4 PRESERVE 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 2.0 AC. 5 6 15' MIN. TYPE'B" FOR MF A P EL am o :. 660 10' MIN. TYPE'A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE 'B" FOR MF 0 LEGEND H — — EXISTIOTMALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 3.05.07.8) 1 PUD DEVIATION PRESERVE SE773ACK5 PRINCI PAL STRUCTURES 25 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10FEET SHADOWW-OOD SUBDIVIS—IONS PO SHADOWWOOD PAGE p 19 78-79 N i SHADOWWOOD VILLAS 23 8687 e4' 2 REPLATOF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 95-99 A 15' MIN. TYPES' BUFFER 16 MIN. TYPE 'B' BUFFER -. 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER PUD HOMES OF A a ISLANDIA i TCO FPUD LASIP NSERVATION AREA NJ (�L RSF-4 193 ' PUD NAPLESLAKES COUNTRY CLUB TRACT C I& MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER RSF-4 W WO SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS 7� 3 3� ( A 1 n I l !TI II 3 WING SOUTH AIRPARK EXT 61 20-21 ,: 2' RSF-3 z REc n SHADOW PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY DESCRIPTION ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS TRACTA- RESIDENTIAL 39.67± 194 TRACT[ - RESIDENTIAL 77.98± 364 TRACT 9 5.68± 16 TRACTC-SINGLE-FAMILY 41.78± N/A RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE DRIVE 3.00± N/A TOTALS 168.1± 574 GROSSDENSITY 3.41UNITS/ACRE PRESERVE 3.8ACRES±PERRZ-S9 P LAKE RMF-6 TRACT A 29 MIN. TYPE "D' _ — — — — — 2 BUFFER RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD— PUD LELY RESORT i PUD COLLEGE PARK REVISIONS 950 Encore Way 11127/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW Naples, FL. 34110 12/02/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW ! RL Phane: (239) 254-2�0 9) 25 -2 1/17120 REV. PER COUNTY PLANNER Florida of 06111/20 REV. PER CCBBC O x/easaax�ale2lASRaeexKn Authorizalion No.1 T72 02/18/21 REV. PRESERVE AREA /0/21 REV. NORTHERN ACCESS UPHAGAN ENGINEERING 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 20313 Naples, Flerfde 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 SHADOWWOOD PUD MASTER PLAN 07 07/02/21 REV. NORTHERN ACCESS 01/07/22 ADD DEVIATION NOTE 22 DD BUFFER CONDITION OW4/22 D SANDY LANE RPUD NOTE DATE 01 /2020 E N0. 2021-015 SCALE As Shown ISEET 1 OF 1 07/2 REVISED BUFFER CONDITION Page 21 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words st+-tek Aila h are deletions H:A2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\Post CCPC\Shadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx- Packet Pg. 1288 _n a 0 C > R/W LII z < m �> _(It X 0� Wo 0 t-< . � 9 "! 0 Ct V) 0 (7) m p a m E:_ -oil NO >_ rn:n 0 M (A m _;U 0 r 0 z CZ of Z> > M 0 0 0 0 CD I 0 WMLO rn (A ;0 z 2 L (Yo 0 F4 R/W LINE z vav a-ftd Tmd "-CWW pm-\pWM\&-W 2-Mb. 2 CLIENT, NAPLES ASSOCIATES VI, LLLP. -0 Bulb 7. NW. %r1dQ. 34104 zm- Fm 230-206-OM SHADOWWOOD PUD -TRACT E MDWWW W. DW�. PM FLO 000 Ibb- WW A—d.10.. UZ nMft ROBAU & Assocum i�s D NO I M If AlOWNWn NW.30M EXHIBIT C-1 CROSS SECTION P110JECT I SHEET NUMBER; 21-00-002 NUMBER: 1 OF 1 Page 22 of 22 Words underlined are additions; words smmek Apeugh are deletions H12021 \20210I5\WP\PUDA\Post CCIPOShadowwood PUD (PL-20210001253) (11-18-2022).docx. 0 Packet Pg. 1289 17. D.4 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petition of the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirements of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petition or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s). NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP, PRESIDENT/CEO, WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERTY NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL-20200001208 & PL-20210001253. SIGNATURE OF APPL TOR AGENT Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way STREET OR P.O. BOX Naples, FL 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The forP oing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 31stday of October 2022, by means of . physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, who ispersonally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. -- - - STEPHANIE KAi20� ��.' +,jj,�j ( � Notary Public • State of Floridi Signaturof Notary Public Commission M GG 9i5�39 tt '�oFn4� My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 a r ry Assn. Printed Name of Notary Public (Stamp with serial number) Packet Pg. 1290 • ram:101, ��+.{t ./•y '` ,� -t r•' ;�.T'"!'IAc: �,.•C,,4.,�:(/;f _ �^��,`f t .i °- v t.t•_ "� I `� :�;° ir1 'j,'~� v'.. 1. y> � ✓�S�_ I y' f`�1 rt� , «` .I�,i 4 � f � > _� 'yj1Vc� ''L� A(.� Y d � �� ^JO��, yq'�";111di '� �!i:, I>.�l'-"• Y.:K+�C'. S �s.� t l" '�'' � �� 54-t tip �,... 1 7`.'�'�v(�\ ' / j Owl. rVr" h / -1 .�,fo � � •j , 4 t ; 1 • . tl g }t 1!C. NOTICE SANDY LANE RPUD: PETITION NO, PUDZ.PL-20200001208 & .253 Board Of •Commissioners' Chambers Ic Third Floor, Collier County Government Center ;�• _ �{.,ice � f3299 Tamiami� • � •� •`�; - .�, R ,• t I fir*. Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner- 239-252-4312 41 ra Stk � ;1.�" ,y� •, /r v ; ��4 •' � � - J~ � ,r .�.rJ1.. �I-'ti v`�-:df S'.y ''�. t '• ' .7 ��-'. Y•: fi. a:1,t., .•! r �,eyt t - +Cw j�[Ri ` rlt Y.,��w'1-iL' _j.•h ��. ...� �� '•!� _ •+ �.� .1. •.. .;� '�-!*ems ; �, i-;'�' .�i �, ., � � r t..:• � - l , - � } �'^• j a :. (! �s. h •. 'y � � _ liZ.� -€' • �..�_.x - t,' r _i�� -t: h t M 4,w •.. '.f� ` •N'S '4rt ty s : ♦ * T'� , �' C `i, 'lyY��y�..aii►,w_1 : �.3�.i,f,.i� 1.., ti ... foy •.A• `� �. .'r. � c %L � �,�3�. �� ro.� R '�'� y; � � 1 ��-.� .; ,�,,w�� r , . - - w� �, � � � � �,. a.' �"',it~ far. � �• � � � r . ,.�,, �,� +, • s ",� �� • '�� ` � ;�;�*fir/ �} #":�Ca� ,y�-'�_ r_,� �r ,� � � D � � I ,1l� " ` e � - r -►3; "'�5". Y 3 �i .4V @• .�' ` �= ,• o... � {,�' ^•tip IN toll \r' ry •� "i 1 'if! *ki yf\!•%... 11'` ••y,' ` 1\-',i�$}j.'b,1ay�y. ,��.,1. ��®'y`T 1 qw If It ( eft kv 14 PUBLIC HEARING NOTOC SANDY LANE RPUD: PETITION NO, PUOZ PETITION NO. PUDA-PWD21000251 iir Board of County Cornmissioners'Chambers Third Floor, Collier COLInty Government Center 3299 Tatniarni Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 Tirnothy Finn, AlCP. Principal Planner; 239-252-4312 IL '��-Yr�is i �' "� ' ;: -`' ''' . -,� �� ,rt• Lei. I 1 ��. y� 5 � - .. 1' * .� try f�••/ , PUBLIC HEARING • � J r SANDY LANE RPLID:• •PUDZ.PL-202000012 Board of County Commissioners' Chamb •` , :.tom � 1! Third Floor, Collier County Government Cc �• Naples, TiM or �'r� t, 17.D.4 ` `.a. 0 r.� f O J O R 1 � M PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE N i r 1 0 SA14DY LANE RPUD: PETITION NO PUDZ-PL-20200001208 & 0 0 SHADOVMOOD PUD AMENDMENT' PETITION NO. PUDA-PL-20210001253 N CCPC: NOVEMBER 17, 2022 - 9:00 a.m. J BCC: JANUARY 24, 2023 - 9:00 a.m. IL Board of County Commissioners' Chambers Third Floor. Collier County Government Center co 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 ca Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner: 239-252-4312 a► •r - -� ♦. S7�'. '�R, a'i� i• .� I' >r. r► '� .� R �..,. �.;.. :!MAr•. :�'� f�.-•.tis- � , ,+� � � i .� n-. it �1. � 4:- � f► ��. yl y4.lY.' * :!s. � k� � '�yh�T' f : ice~ � ~ �'�1^•:i�' 'A � ice'. �� a ��\� � ?i tr a:p`�[,+�c' � +�+ °v ,,Y ;r - ..J `.:V ��,�� f. •�• 1 e - r*• ♦ ..!. :i .+�`, C•. ,�a. •T r,/ ��,�', � ��;`�, 1~ f .r:jr ,.�'��Y �`,,f�1; ��\�'�!T`- Q ` 'n1jfy� �i Y 1.�.\ \i� ��.. -y�li �.r �,:�';k �. ,:• - C t-- ♦.`' _� .A:�-�.'1�1 �1 Ay- /.yii r:17�C .� T'•''1.~\�• ,}`�'%N. ri.. `r�•i ti' iii•�}Qr�!�;{ "\�i�` t ,,�p.1 ��' 10 j�� .: �1�i"�•.� *i . !'x/��'�it„w,��Ji� i�,�.y{ r.`�,�•�� a,ia:,�?� .*u�t�` ^ 7ty,. � �',� .. ='� .i:'y�';•`,�il ' t;c,�p �''�� L.�. �. '*�:. lNN. � t '� 1.%.. n :'u�. �t~ �,wi .; . T '1 1� i.. "�� ' L 'y E 5 iT'!+i�'; _ L Packet Pg. 1295 •m s tol10 : .yµ r M `a ~' .. � !� a :� � (. � �•' ' • ,�•� � �s+T' '.ta ' ��- f •,�.. Y' .r..Y '., 1 .: �' _ + r 1, 'i Syyy D� . 1'a•'. .� ✓ 1G r,!y 91. �. 'p Y S \ I - ,� I,� \ -�j .. + aq �, -`!' 1�•1 J� , ♦_ if; ,t t I _'�+�NI• �' % 1.'r �ti j �r r".:} 1 ~ i i �I�;��i,��`t S��r i �r "Y�.s •� — �, � �.�� '; t f � ' t �1�1� i /r f �r � �7, 7l• •�'\ � � _. � f,� •� ... '-�— �� •1 � � i� !,,y �,w �. �..� ^�. �� / • �(4' +'. �, ":IV,� t .4 � I yF{r>r i'�. �C +��;f {{ �� iti;f� ��i 1 �� I� l � � i' : Cry, v� h �\ li .. � � r��11 �t ��..:1 � �:`.�..,�� . a3b�� 17.D.5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on January 24, 2023, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-49, AS AMENDED, THE SHADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN TO ADD A POTENTIAL ROADWAY. INTERCONNECTION FROM TRACT E TO THE PROPOSED SANDY LANE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH WHICH IF APPROVED, WILL REPLACE THE ROADWAY CONNECTION TO POLLY AVENUE; BY ADDING ROADWAY, SIGNAGE AND MODEL HOME DEVIATIONS AND BY REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 77.993 ACRES IS PART OF THE 168.10s ACRE PUD LOCATED AT THE WING SOUTH AIR PARK, EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD BETWEEN DAVIS BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD, IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20210001253] Davis BLVD 91 0007 O c � V m, W m 10 t�1 is Project Location Rattlesnake Hammock RQ '>+ Sabal Palm RD A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing, All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at (239) 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAI RICK LOCASTRO, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Martha Vergara/Merline Forgue, Deputy Clerks (SEAL) L 0 a 0 0 0 s 0 M N_ O O O N O N J a 00 co M 00 O M N Im C tv M tt3 d w C d E s V M Q N6GC109981WO1 Packet Pg. 1297 Collier County .,.._..� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROUVTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.�ov Assigned Planner: 2800 NOR">•H HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Date and Tirne: Tim Finn P UDA Tuesday Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): 6/15,/21 Project information Project Name: Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) PL#: 20210001253 Property ID #: 0 0 418 6 4 0 0 0 7 Current Zonin g Project Address: City: Napl e s at 9 : 0 0 AM - SKYPE PUD State; FL Zip; 3 4112 Applicant: Pau 1 a NC McMichael , AI CP , VP P 1 ann i ng Svc . Ho 1 e Mont e s Inc . Agent Name: F' au 1 a NC McMi chae 1 Phone: 239-254-2018 Agent/Firm Address: 950 Encore Way City: Naples State: Property Owner: Naples Associates VI LLLP Please provide the following, if applicable: ... iii. v. Total Acreage: Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: FL Zip:34110 If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2�21 Page � 1 of 5 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GR0INTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coll iercountvf I.�av Meeting Notes t :: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORiDA 34104 �239) 252-2400 As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — fink is httpS://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 �r �, � -.� Tc �7�-c.,�. J ....... t u Zt � -- � i l�:�i. If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. -along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton�naplesgov.con� Allyson Holland AMHoltand��naplesgov.co�7� Robin Singer RSinger(a�naplesgov.com Erica Martin emartin(a�naplesgov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Adminisfrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 2 of 5 J er County Growth Management Department April 23, 2021 Ms. Paula McMichael, Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 AICP ��nin.� �er�rice� ��+ction RE: PMC-PL202100003 83, Minor Change to the Shadowwood PUD Master Plan. Dear Ms. McMichael: In your application, you have asked staff to consider a proposed PUD Minor Change {PMC) to the above referenced PUD Master Plan pursuant to Section Land Development Code (LDC). The preserve areas totaling 2.0 acres within into one preserve area boundary as depicted Attached). proposed PMC seeks to comb 10.02.13.E.3 of the ine three separate Tract "E" of the currently approved Master Plan totaling 2.0 acres and to be located along the western property n the revised PUD Master Plan dated February 18, 2021 (See I have reviewed the amended PUD Master Plan and have determined that the proposed minor refinements are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and with the applicable criteria contained in the LDC for minor changes to an approved Master Plan. You may wish to have this letter recorded in the official records of Collier permanent record of the approval. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, -: 1 /-' .i � , �� Raymor�d Bellows, Zoning Manager Planning��& Zoning Division —Growth Management Department cc: Correspondence file Laurie Beard, PUD Monitoring County as a .�:��E a� 843 and 20� 17, is located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock approximately uarters of f mile eastSanta Barbara Boulevardl Range 16, i Colher County, Flon*da. The e e wwood PUD is 168. 10 acres, and allows for single and nulti4amily residential, and . private air is i � � � � • � a � � � • � � a is Surroundingand Use Map (FLUM), land uses to Tract E include residential development4 the orth south, east, • i west. There is an parceleast • CFPUD (LASIP onservation Area); and an undeveloped parcel to the north zoned A � Agricultural. ,orthernportion of the PUD. There are ted Master • totaling ±2-0 acres. This is a request for a minor amendment to the Master Plan to configure the preserves .. provide one, conuous j` acres ` i reserve adjacent to the westem roperty boundary. • • wi 11 increase Land Development ...ode LDC 3.05.07.A.5), which encourages preservation areas to emphasize the largest oil 0 ontiruous area • fresult in • • ftive vege• • if !f ManagementLne reqiesiea amenctment is compatible with ad acent land uses has no impacts external to the ite, and is consistent with the provisions of the LDC and Growth H:1202I12fl2 l {}1 S�Wiy1,PA�CIRet�uest and. Jusfficatic�n (3-2-2Q2 i }.dc�x E v vi N 0 N C) r 3 Y A O N r TT CD O 2 g a 0 D a WATERFORD ESTATES NORTH o � soo SCALE- IN FEET 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF 10' MIN. TYPE "D" BUFFER NARLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB 2324 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF 623' 'ATRACT E Ingress,'Egr (TSD at SDPIPPL) APRESERVE 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 2.0 AC. 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR NIF Ao P EL A D 6.06 v � ST 660 m 0 NON ST Cn � 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF KINi AVENUE 5 132' 500 No ONYX LEGEND — — EXISTING SIDEWALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 3.05.07.B) 1> PUD DEVIATION PRESERVE SETBACKS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 25FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 FEET SHADOWWOOD SUBDIVISIONS PB PAGE SHADOWWOOD 19 78r79 � SHADOWWOOD VILLAS 23 86.87 2 REPLAT OF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 95-99 3 WING SOUTH AlRPARKEXT 61 2&21 SHADOW PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY DESCRIPTION ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS TRACTA -RESIDENTIAL 39.67± 194 TRACT E - RESIDENTIAL 77.98± 364 TRACT B 5.68± 16 TRACT C -SINGLE-FAMILY 41.7& N/A RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE DRIVE 3.00± N/A TOTALS 16&l± 574 GROSS DENSITY 3.41 UNITS/ACRE PRESERVE 3.8ACRE5±PER RZ-59 REVISIONS 9/2/19 REVISED PER RAI #3 10/23/19 REVISED PER RAI #4 10/28/19 REVISED PER ENVIR. STAFF 11/25/19 REVISED PER PLANNING STAFF 11/27/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 12/02/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 1/17/20 REV, PER COUNTY PLANNER 06/11/20 REV. PER CCBBC 02/18/21 IREV. PRESERVE AREA HOMES OF ISLANDIA LASIP CONSERVATIOPJ AREA. 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15'MIN.TYPE"B"FORMF 16'� RSF-4 193 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER -. 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER RSF-4 WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS 3 2 3 REC IZ p �( LAKE TRACT A 20' MIN. TYPE "D" Z BUFFER -- -----,__,---------- RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD PUD LELY RESORT 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 Phone: (239} 254-2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization No.1772 I�'7 ENGINEERING 1250 TAMIAti11 TRAIL NORTH, STE. 203E Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 PUD MAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER COLLEGE PARK SHAD0INWUOD PUDA PL 20190000259 SHADOWWOOD PUD M ASTER PLAN E PROJECT N0. SCALE SHEEP 01 /2020 2019-240 As Shown 1 OF 1 � 1 ♦: t � !i COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.�ov Meeting Notes /� �• �, Ti�.� - /`�� X� f r �-- 5.��. ,4- .� � 5-.�-�_ 2800 NORTH HOR MAPLES, FLORIDA (239) 252-2400 SESHOE 34104 DRIVE �.� �,�M�- �v�� s �N Ph�� •,� V' � �Lv �� ;� .� �1 r!- L — 41-�q-�c, �� w,� � - �� F��i�-�,�- d � �tE. �-- t .�-� �.t. 3 . �,. Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer.• Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2�21 Page � 3 of 5 i nomast iamevEN From: FeyEric Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 1:35 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting PL20210001253 - Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) Tom, These are my notes for the subject pre -application meeting. The concurrent PUDZ application submitted for PL20200001208 Sandy Lane RPUD presents an opportunity for interconnection of the water distribution systems. Please include a commitment to provide a water main stub -out to the DUD boundary at the potential roadway interconnection shown on the master plan. The water main shall be a minimum size of 8 inches and shall be located in the platted road right-of-way. A County Utility Easement (CUE) for the stub -out shall be shown on any final subdivision plat and shall be conveyed to the Collier County Water -Sewer District (District) in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance at no cost to the County or District, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, prior to or concurrent with final acceptance of utilities. If the adjacent project is developed first, then this project should connect to any stub -out provided. Please coordinate commitment language to this effect with the County Attorney's Office and Public Utilities staff. Respectf u I ly, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager Public Utilifies Engineering & Projecf lulanagerr�ent Division Continuous lmpravement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 "H ow ARE WE DOING?" Please click here far our Customer Service Survey -----Original Appointment----- CDS-C <CDS-C@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, May 24, 20214:24 PM To: CDS-C; paulamcmichael@hmeng.com; jeremiechastain@hmeng.com; stephaniekarol@hmeng.com; Richard.arkin@glhomes.com; Kevin.ratterree@glhomes.com; John.asher@glhomes.com; ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz; cmalaescu@trebilcock.biz; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart -Taylor; AnthonyDavid; ArnoldMichelles AshkarSally; AshtonHeidi; BeardLaurie, BeddowShar; Brad Jackson; BrownCraig; BullertBenjamin; CascioGeorge; CastroGabriela; ChachereKatherine; ChurchWilliam; ColeTabatha; CookJaime; CrotteauKathynell; Daniel Zunzunegui; David Ogilvie; Deleon0mar; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FinnTimothys ForesterDebrah; GewirtzStorm; GibbonsMichael; GiblinCormac; GosselinLiz; GrantKimberley; GundlachNancy; HumphriesAlicia; JacobLisa; JenkinsAnita; John HouldsworthVEN; JohnsonEric; KellyJohn; KurtzGerald; LauraDeJohnVEN; LevyMichael; LintzSean; LulichPamela; LynchDiane; MargaritaAcevedoVEN; MastrobertoThomass McKennaJack; McLeanMatthew; MedinaJosephine; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; NicholsonJoanna; NuteMelissa; OrthRichard; PadronAilyn; PajerCraig; PattersonAmy; a ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 8:36 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Notes for Shadowwood PUD (PUDA - P120210001253 Thomas, Please provide the following pre app meeting notes: For this petition request please provide a letter of no additional transportation impacts TIS Waiver; (separate letter on letterhead requesting the waiver based on deminimis transportation impacts and the proposed access changes to interconnect with the Sandy Lane PUD). Provide any additional -related TIS information based on the proposed Sandy Land PUD which will now be interconnected to this PUD (specifically the signal warrant discussed at the pre app). Please also update the current construction unit count related to the NTMP transportation developer commitment. Please let us know of any questions -concerns. Respectfully, �'Iiel��el Sawyer Principal Planner Grotivth Management Department TI'c111SpOriatlOtl Pl�illniTlg 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sa�vve coil i ercouzitti�t� . Gov From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 1:49 PM To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Notes for Shadowwood PUD (PUDA - P120210001253 Hey Mike, I am sure you were double booked on June 15, but could you review the above PUDA Pre-App which has to do with interconnections and Sandy Lane PUD? Thanks To m Operations Coordinator -Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZonin� 1 �� ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:18 AM To: FinnTimothy co ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre Application Meeting PL20210001253 - Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) PUD Monitoring Pre-app notes: Please include in the amendment the following language: "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff. and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." "Pursuant to Section 12�.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." 7"hank you. Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. Beard 6EDCol IierCountvFL.aov Phone: (239)-252-5782 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Subject: TempletonMark Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8:57 AM ThomasClarkeVEN PL20210001253 - Shadowwood PU D (PU DA) Hi Thomas, For my review on the above amendment, I'll just be looking to make sure the perimeter buffers are labeled on the updated Master Plan. Respectfully, Mark Templeton, RLA Principal Planner/Landscape Review CoHnty Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day! Nt7TE: Email Address Nas Changed 2300 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2475 flow are we doings Please CLICK HERE to fill out a customer Survey. We appreciate yourFeedback! Disclaimer- this email is �1ot to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of�any perl�lit, pIa», project, oi� deviatio�l from the Land Development Code. Under Florida La�v, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do riot want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do ��ot send e(ectrOnic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. YhomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: BosiMichael Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:10 AM AshtonHeidi KlatzkowJeff; JenkinsAnita; BellowsRay; YhomasClarkeVEN; FinnTimothy RE: Pre-App Research for Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) - PL20210001253, SKYPE Meeting on Tuesday 6/15/2021 at 9:00 AM Thanks Heidi, I rely upon your instincts, but it's proposed as a PUDA and as such it has to go to the CCPC and BCC. I guess your point is that they are proposing two interconnection point changes within the request and therefore it could be processed as_a PDI and go before the HEX. We will maintain the stance that this be processed as a PUDA and follow_ the required CCPC and BCC hearing path. Thanks, mike From: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:00 AM To: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; YhomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Pre-App Research for Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) - PL20210001253, SKYPE Meeting on Tuesday 6/15/2021 at 9:00 AM Mike, Because ofi the lengthy discussion on the access point proposed to be changed at the CCPC during the last PUDA, it is my recommendation that you schedule this amendment for the CCPC and BCC. Your call. Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 Frorn: YhomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyf�ov> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 1:16 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.�ov>; Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Crai�.Brown@colliercountyfl.�ov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.�ov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.�ov_>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.�ov_>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.�ov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.�ov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.�ov>; PollardBrandi <Brandi.Pollard@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.�ov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.�ov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.�ov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.Rov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@coll�ercountyfl.Rov>; YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows _ colliercountyfl.�ov> ThomasCiarkevEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 10:12 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App Research for Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) - PL20210001253, SKYPE Meeting on Tuesday 6/15/2021 at 9:00 AM There are no Environmental issues with this one. There are no data or fees needed on this one. I'm going to provide you the notes for all of the pre-apps from last week this AM. Let me know if you have any questions. Craig Brov�rn Senior Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 1:16 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfLgov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown @colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliei rcountyfl•gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@collercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; PollardBrandi <Brandi.Pollard@colliercountyfLgov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre -Ann Research for Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) - PL20210001253, SKYPE Meeting on Tuesday 6/15/2021 at 9:00 AM Good Afternoon All, Please review the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for Shadowwood PUD PL20210001253. The virtual meeting is scheduled for Tuesda Join Skype Meetin Trouble Joining? Try Skype Web App 6/15/2021 at 9:00 AM- SKYPE Meetin ��o[l�e-r County a;:.se �'�V�.��r. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.�av (239) 252-2400 Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov _ � Matt McLean, P.E. Development REview Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov l� Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov �� Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Tran:pit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Derek Perry Assistant Courty Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov Brandi Pollard Utility impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com Development Review `� Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov �� James Sabo, AICP Zoning Princi��al Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov � Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov �_ � Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov �' Peter Shawinsky Architectur�il Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov LfY Mark Templeton Landsca e Review p 252-2475 mark.tem leton colliercount fl. ov p @ Y g Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica �'elasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Freview 252-2962 Jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov �- Kirsten Wilkie Environmental REview Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review -Zoning 252-5748 Christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov C�Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email �� '•��" y;Lwt j Iz �jyLC�Gcr� {� . �1 Cn r✓ � �e � � �� . . /L � 1 Iri � C h � � :t 1� � �' (y- �, , ; � �,, ..., _ ....- � ,v CJ L � (� -.� t ,r. c�'C u- N4� c �'T� � � �. .�,v �. �1. � �C ►vfi�� ,ti, Updated 1/12/2021 Page (5 of 5 �S CoLfier County �.: ./'— _ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GR0INTFI MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 341�4 www.colliercountyfl.�ov �239� 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20210001253 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com '� Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov �� Ray Bellows I�; '`� Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 Craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov -1' Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Managing Asst. County Heidi Ashton Cicko Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑'' Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov Jackie De la Osa North Collier Fire 252-2312 jdelaosa@northcollierfire.com �_I Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com �, ��'� Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov '�`'� Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov .� Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov �_. Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov Structural/Residential Plan ❑ Michael Gibbons Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyf{.gov Development Review -Planning Cormac Giblin, AICP Mana er g 252-5095 Cormac. iblin colliercount fl. ov g @ y g ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principa( Planner 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov �� John Ho�.Jldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 John.houldsworth@colliercountyfi.gov '� Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov r ' Anita Jenkins Planning &Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov �' �, John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov �__� Parker Klopf Zoning Senior Planner 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com n Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com r� �J Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov �' Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 4 of 5 ___ _, Applicontplgent may also send site plans or conceptual plans Jul review in advance if desired. Zoning Division PL20210001253 - Shadowwood PUD lruuml Planner- Tim Finn Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Jeremy Frantz,(Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc. 239-254-2018 • Agent to list for PL# • Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc. 2391ow254-2018 • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Naples Associates VI LLLP Suite 400 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) This is a request to amend the Shadowwood PUD, approved by Ordinance 82-49, and subsequently amended by Ordinances 081oo43 and 20-17. The PUD is generally located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive approximately three quarters of a mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Shadowwood PUD is 1168.10 acres, and allows for single and multi- family residential, and a private air park. The requested amendment would remove one interconnection to the west as shown on the Master Plan and add an interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD to the north. The Sandy Lane RPUD is currently under review, PL20200001208. • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that aPPIY)� • Details about Project: REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Title: Vice President Email: paulamcmichael@hmeng.com Phone: 239-254-2018 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-6866 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive •Naples, Florida 34104.234.252-2400 • umk{.colGergov.net Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, percentage of stock owned by each: list the officers and stockholders and the Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries percentage of interest: Created 9/28/2017 of the trust with the Name and AddressOwnership Page 1 of 3 Collier CoHnty --�� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.co!lier�ov.net (239) 252-240Q FAX: �239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or • ficers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier�ov.net Date of option: .., ,.: .. -_ , y= � �. C.o � � e� �ou�.t �. _ � 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form, Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included �n this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name {please print) Created 0/28/2017 Date Page3of3 -- _;� Col��er County COLLIER COUNT1( GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercou nty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at htt �:1ww�uv.colliercauntvfl.�ov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment rs necessary 1 Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ,❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deeds) 1 .� ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 .� ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 � ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ �". Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearir�gs. ❑ ❑ [� Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 �❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ -� Checklist continues on next page March 4. 2020 Page9of11 .�U L L IU U %mA K rL COLLIER COUNT1( GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercou ntv.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239j 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11 copy LO ❑ Original Amending PUD the document/ordinance, PUD and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if D � ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ,� *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit Co. Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsectionapplicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 69U-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District Lockheart (Residential Components): Amy ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey 41 Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other:; rc El City of Naples Utilities El Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION � Pre -Application Meeting: $500-00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre C PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 C Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $11000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 00)tWor County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co l i i e rco u nty. gov Legal Advertising Fees: ,X'CCPC: $1,125.00 � BCC: $500600 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5£'' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20°° of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date Marc}14, 2420 Page 11 of 11 m A IS jaw mm COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.cofliercaunty,gov 2$04 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPES, FL.ORIDA 341Q4 {239} 252-2400 FAX: {239} 252-6358 App�i�atior� for � Publ'c tiear�ng for PUD f�ezo�e,"Amendment io PUD or - PIDD to �IJD Reo�� :`_ PETITION No PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED To be completed by staff PUD Rezone {PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.1� E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone {PUDR): LDC subsection 1Q.Q2.13 A.-F. Name of Propert Owners : Naples Associates VI, LLLP v (� Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 1600 Sawgrass Corp Pkwy City: Sunrise State: FL 33323 ZIP. Telephone: 954-753-1730 cell: N/A N/A Fax. E-Mail Address: Richard.arkinC�glhomes.com Name of Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President &Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, V. President* Firm: Hole Montes, Inc. Address: 950 Encore VVay Cit Naples state; F�- zIP: 34110 v Tele hone: 239-254-2000 Cell: N/A Fax: 239-254�-2099 p E-Mail Address: paulamcmichael@hmeng.com *Name Firm: o f Agent Coleman, Richard D. Yovanovich Yovanovi.ch, Esquire & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34103 Phone/Fax:239-435-3535,239-435-1218 Email:ryovanovich�cyklawfirm.com March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GR011UTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,colliercounty.gow _ __ __� `R C .. .,_ �. - =- f 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239} 252-2400 FAX: (239} 252-6358 __ -, � E � iJ SST' _ ._ : _ . _ .. _ _ _ _ _ This application is requesting a rezone from: PUD zonin districts . g {} Puy Zoning districts) to the Present Use of the Pro ert : Vacant/undeveloped, residential, air park p Y Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the pro ert Residential, air park p Y Original PUD Name: Shadowwood PUD � • - �• PROPERTY INFORIUI�TION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: ® If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and ® The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section%Township/Range: 16 J 5os J 26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes &Bounds Descri tion: Bee attached Boundary Survey p Plat Book: Page #: Property l.D. Number: 0041$640007 Size of Pro ert : 2,325 ft. x 3,160 ft. - 7,323,750 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 168,10 p Y Address/ General location of Subject Property: North side of Rattlesnake Hammock Dr., approximately three quarters of a mile east of Santa Barbara Blvd. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Q■ Residential ❑ C ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: unity Facilities ❑ Industrial March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co l l i e rco u nty.goWIN V 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Zoning Land Use N A, Agriculture & PUD Undeveloped & Residential S Rattlesnake Hammock Road, PUD Single -Family Residential E PUD, CFPUD Residential, & Conservation Area w A, Agriculture, RSF-3, RMF-6 Single -Family Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: _J�/ Lot. Block. Subdivision. Metes &Bounds DescriptiIt on: Property I.D. Number: T DNS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association{s� that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary, Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.asi3x?page.774. Name of Homeowner Association: Naples Heritage Galf &Country Glub, Inc. Mailing Address: 185Q Heritage Club Way City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34112 Name of Homeowner Association: Naples Lakes Coun#ry Club Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Mailing Address: 4784 Naples Lakes Blvd. City+ Naples State: F� Zip; 34112 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 Co�l�e� County CQLLIER COUNTY GC3VERNMENT GROINTN MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u nty.gov 2800 NORTFI HORSESHOE DRIVE N�PLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239} 252-2400 FAX: (239} 252-635� . _. - _ ._ .� ,,. _ _. _, - _ - _ _ ., _ _ ._ ,; - ,.._. _ _ i�, Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria, on a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the reione request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. See attached evaluation Criteria a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or Other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.} d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2Q20 Page 4 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u nty. gov 2800 ,NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239} 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Ef so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ Na if so please provide copies. PMC- PL2 0210 0 0 03 8 3 .:. __ _.. } _ _ .._ - - --: _... _._ - - - This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting �NIM�, pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 1�.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the N1M procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Cade requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign�sj after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s� immediately. ._ -- ._ .-RcD�NG-�-��R: �.`M�TM�T _ _ ._: _ _ .. .. _� �. _, . _. Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name} at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue arocessinE or otherwise actively pursue the rezonine. amendment or change, far a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shalt be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Name of Applicant(s): ev County NET APPZICABLE 28QQ NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UT1LfTY PROVISIONS 1=0R PUD REZONE REQUEST Address: City: State: Telephone: Cell: Fax: E�Mail Address: Address of Subject Property (If available): State: Section/Township/Range: _f_J Lat: Black: Subdivision: Metes &Bounds Description: ZIP: Plat Baok: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System d. Package Treatment Plant e. Septic System Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b, City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System d. Private System (Well) C?T APPLICABLE N Provide Name: (GPD Capacity): Provide Name: ZIP: Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daify Demands: A. Water -Peak: Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily: If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 Coi(ier Coxnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Narrative statement: Provide a brief and 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is locafied within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. NOT APPLICABLE Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of �.1 Collier Coxnty :� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 wvwv.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (Z39) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property corn monly known as Folio #: 0041 s640007 Naples, FL 34112 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for PUD planned unit development (PUD PUDJ zoning. We hereby designateP-'�'°'`��"°'�p�'"�°'°'°�a.Y°�^°Y�h legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring a nd authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. C� The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner N. Maria Menendez. Vice President of Naples VI Printed Name General PartneroiNaplesAssociates Vl, LLLP STATE OF FLORIDA Owner Printed Name COUNTY OF '�� '�� BROWARD S� The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of x[�physical presence or[�online notarization this day of October , 20 21 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) N, Maria Menendez, Vice President or Naples VI Corporation Such persons) Notary Public must check applicable box: Ix Are personally known to me IJ]Has produced a current drivers license OHas produced � as identif�E�tion. _ Notary Sign dQ... ,..,,. • �,,�hY ri�1; .. KANDIDA RINKER JOLLAY :,: Comrnlsslon #i GG 3Q5725 :�; �.- , E�;°=� Expires July 13, 2023 '-%,��r�f� ;;; � 6nndo�l Thru Troy F�In Insurnncn ti�4-3fl5-7fl I!1 March 4, 2020 � �J Page 8 of 11 oK 161 PG 30i.4 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIEI'2 COUNTY, FLORIDA. DESCRI PT10N COUNTY, FLO ALL THAT PART RANGE 26 EAST, FOLLOVVS: T OF SECTION 16, TOV'IINSHIP 5Q SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER iT 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 5Q SOUT'I-�, LINTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COIUiI�l9ENCING AT THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16t`:Nt OF THE PARCEi. HEREIN D T CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH 89°2005" WEST 630,02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ED; THENCE SOUTH 00° 14' 25" EAST 170.00 FEET; HENCE SOUTH 27 3538EAS 4-:-BEET; THENCE SOUTH as°14` 25" EAST 1:r�" �� 3 fT L:I I , THENCE NORTH 89'45'35" FAST 1 .0►r:'Dq I* E4 ; THENCE SOUTH 22002'30" EAST 10 1=4eve, TO THE Wat EST LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIVtIAY EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN V911:::: 9, .,WAGE 301, COLLIER GtJUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THE im ta`.` II ; AID WEST LINE SOUTH 00014' 25" EAST 1263.56 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WI: a :..TH PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN CONDO: ` t Iuat PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE. 46, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FL lC3 lJ" T ENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) DESCRIBED COURSES. 1) SOUTH 89045'35" WEST 193.02 FEET;to 2} NORTH 62051'11" WEST 141.69 FEET; r;. �, 3) SOUTH 620121 4) SOUTH 5) NORTH 15" WEST 108.47 FEET 89°45' 35" VVE$T 50�.OQ FEET ; (0° 14' 25" WEST 16.52 FEET, fi)SOUTH 89°45'35" WEST 132.69 FEET TO THE WEST LI>, SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE N THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALO EAST 677.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PAFtC�L AND EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1i2 OF 13'25" VILEST 2a28.59 FEET TO NC)RTH LINE SOUTH 89020'05" 1 f EIN DESCRIBED, THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4} OF THE NORTHWEST C�1�-E-!C�": �4�tTER {1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER {114) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 5�`. '''?. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE SOUTHERLY AND THE WES ' # �.Y'_. a. ;FEET THEREOF FOR. ROAD RIGHT-OF�WAY PURPOSES: AN D THE NORTHEAST ONE�QUARTER (1�4) OF THE NORThfVUEST ONE -QUARTER {1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE^QUARTER (1/4} OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; i'HE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4} OF 'THE NORTHVIIEST ONE -QUARTER {1l4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOVIlNSW1P 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORiDA; 'nA OR 5817 PG 3015 ww AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COIUIMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SEG7'iON 16, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTl. N 16, NORTH 89"20'05" WEST 260.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL-';{ �N DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG' O.R. 593, PAGE 30t� , OIL 0° 4'25" EAST' 780.0 THENCE NORTH 22°02'3Q,,,', THENCE SOUTH 8904511 THENCE NORTH 00014'25" W THENCE NORTH 27°35'38" VV THENCE NORTH 00°14'25" LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TA�tIVVAY EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN R COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SOUTH THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH: BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HE � a�.7�► FEET, 0,00 FEET, 1 ' O.OD FEET; 4. ,94 FEET, 170.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTICIN 16, .INYSyUTH 89°�2 �I E CRIBEDv m4 t .•.A .. r!•' ny 0'-05" EAST 370.00 FEET TtJ THE POINT OF tit �i 14 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coiliercounty.gov ,.:, _ . .. -: -: . ._:. �-. - - : _z. �.. _. _ - •'' - -' � y ��nai :��tt�l-,� u�r��ht h��kl��# ��r.. ,_. _ . �q _ _ _ _ -� :: P�J #�� ,� Cif, C�� t,;the `A�r��si _ _ __ _ .: _._- _ �� _ ,� _ t, - �A�e�den t�- UD ..�.�f `,` _� - q _ _- �h� D, _ PU �� . �PU a one h . , .�. e� the 2800 NORTH HORSE5HOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 {239) 252-2400 FAX: t239} 252-6358 - - -_ _� l��nosra�v� rr��;�is��:�re :tee = _ _ _ - ��e - - _ The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals wild not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at htta://www.colliercountvfl.�av/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. _ _ - _ _ _.. _: - C� F -_ :i� C�'T' . . .. :.. �:REc�li1�EI�TS_ , :: : : �. _ � ��ED ;. _ .: .,. :: __ . -COPIES '._ : _ RElJ6E .: Cover Fetter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of 1 x wh amendment is ne essar v � v Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version} 1 Pre -application meeting Hates 1 [� Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1. Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ Warranty Deeds} 1 � [] List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey - see Ray Bellows email 1 x� Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included 1 � ❑ an aerial. Statement of Utility Provisions Not Applicable � Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 NSA 1 ❑ C] Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with ❑ ❑ 0 project planner at time of public hearings. Not Applicable Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include co ies of revious surve s. Not Applicable p p y 1 ❑ x Traffic Impact Study See TIS Waiver Request 1 Cj ❑ Historical Survey Not Applicable 1 ❑ o School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable Not Applicable � ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information}+ ❑ ❑ 0 List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this d current is e fro o separat m Exhibit E} Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 341,04 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy � ❑ [� Original PUD Amendin the g document/ordinance, and Master Plan PUD 24" x 36" —Only if � 0 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru &underlined 1 0 Copy of Official Interpretation and%or Zoning Verification 1 [� �] *If located in tmmokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ❑ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification far each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU_�Rural Fringe Mixed Use1 Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.}i.c.,che applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500fnr information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation &Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Garry Williams (Director] Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ ❑ ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ❑ ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: �ASSOCI�4TED; FEES FOFB APPLICI�TION � - � Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 � PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre CIA PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre � PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre � Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 �[� Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting,: $2,500.00 �A Listed or Protected Species Review (when an E15 is not required): $1,000.00 �A Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 ,,' -�;;� i,.;�e. �.rer •.:�;: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GR011UTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: i� CCPC: $1,125.00 � BCC: $500.00 N71A School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the St" and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. �i�nature or reiitioner or Hgent Printed named of signing party ��e Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 fl ��nir�;� ��rvi�e� ��i�t� April 23, 2021 Ms. Paula McMichael, AICP Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore V�ay Naples, FL 34110 RE: PMC-PL202100003 83, Minor Change to the Shadowwood PUD Master Plan Dear Ms. McMichael: In your application, you have asked staff to consider a proposed PUD Minor Change (PMC) to the above referenced PUD Master Plan pursuant to Section 10.02.13.E.3 of the Land Development Cade (LDC). The proposed PMC seeks to combine three separate preserve areas totaling 2.0 acres within Tract "E" of the cu�Tently approved Master Plan into one preserve area totaling 2.0 acres and to be located along the western property boundary as depicted in the revised PUD Master Plan dated February 18, 2021 (See Attached}. I have reviewed the amended PUD Master Plan and have determined that the proposed minor refinements are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and with the applicable criteria contained in the LDC for minor changes to an approved Master Plan. You may wish to have this letter recor permanent record of the approval. ded in the official records of Collier County as a If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ___ � jri __ _ Ra mo� 1 ellows Zonin Mana er y �, � g g Planning &Zoning Division —Growth Management Department cc: Correspondence file Laurie Beard, PUD Monitoring WA LILMaWiIWL" � Kum i 1 MiTJ FIVOkMr 843 and 2047, is located on r north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive approximately luarters f mile r• of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Secti on ! Township 50 South, Range limill r i ` s i PUD is 168.acres, s allows for single and s nulti4amifly residential, and . private a park. and Use Map (FLUM). • Agricultural. land uses to Tract E include residential development to the lorth, south, east, and west. There is an undeveloped parcel to the east zoned CFPUD (LASIP ...onservation Area)'* and an undeveloped parcel to the north zoned A three,orthern portion of the PUD. There are separate s i preserve areas depicted_Master n Tract E totaling ±2.0 acres. This is a request for a minor amendment to the Master Plan to ft .. i g _ the preserves to provide one,, contiguous 0 acres preserve adjacent to the western reconfigurationroperty boundary. This and Development f!` '` encourages preservation ar_, largest �r t� r r r • irienament a 'i wim a.` i uses, has no iscts external Managementite, and is consistent with the provisions of the LDC and Growth H:`202I12021015�WP1PMC1Requ�st and Justificatit�n (3-2-2t�21).docx O 0 WATERFORD ESTATES NORTH 0 800 SCALE IN FEET 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB am isso 16 ,s 2324& A 10' MIN. TYPE "D" W 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF BUFFER L 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF r 623' Ingre76vO6 (TBD PPL) A C Q � 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF m> P EL 6A D � -� -n ST 660 m O NON ST O Im 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF L -NON ONYX MENOMONIE LEGEND - - EXISTING SIDEWALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 3.05.D7.6) 10 PUD DEVIATION PRESERVE SETBACKS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 25 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 FEET SHADOWWOOD SUBDIVISIONS PB PAGE SHADOWWOOD 19 78-79 ke SHADOWWOOD VILLAS 23 86r87 REPLAT OF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 95-99 3 i WING SOUTH AI RPARK EXT 61 20-21 SHADOW PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY DESCRIPTION ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS TRACTA - RESIDENTIAL 39.67± 194 TRACT E - RESIDENTIAL 77.98± 364 TRACT B 5.68± 16 TRACTC-SINGLE-FAMILY 4L78± N/A RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE DRIVE TOTALS GROSS DENSITY PRESERVE 3.00± 168.1t 3.41 UNITS/ACRE 3.8 ACRES± PER RZ-59 REVISIONS 912119 REVISED PER RAI #3 10/23/19 REVISED PER RAI #4 10/28/19 REVISED PER ENVIR, STAFF 11/25/19 REVISED PER PLANNING STAFF 11/27/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 12/02/19 REV, PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 1/17/20 REV, PER COUNTY PLANNER 06/11/20 IREV, PER CCBBC 02/18/21 IREV, PRESERVE AREA N/A 574 3t"�'S I LKL�iFf n-�ii1 r'S I R;;t�Sl SP.iF1C� Ln TOM TRACT E PRESERVE 2.0 AC. 16 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER -� 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER RSF-3 rn it r3 HOMES OF ISLANDIA LASIP CONSERVATION AREA 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF 1 500' 40 RS F-4 193 RSF-4 WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS 3 ;0 i r I m P P 3 �r 2 =- REC 9,de r2 p ALAKE TRACT A 20' MIN. TYPE "D" iz BUFFER- mmmmmmmm — — RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD PUD LELY RESORT 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 Phone: (239) 254~2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization No.1772 FLNGAN ENGINEERING 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 203E Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 0 PUD NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 16 15 NOON 2 222 COLLEGE PARK SHADOWWOOD P U DA PL 20190000259 DATE 01 /2020 PUD MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 2019-240 As Shown SHEET 1 OF 1 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL-20210001253 l� N. Marta Menendez (print name), aS vice President (title, If applicable} Of Naples VI Corporation, general partner of Naples Associates VI, LLLP (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals} requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3.. !have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. J. WeII authorlZe Paula �AcMichael, AICP, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP &Richard Yovanovich, Esq. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core, pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant Is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C,) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should fypically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a (rust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee': • In each insfance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the -facts stated in it are true. natur STATE OF FLORIDA ' COUNTY OF �A+-L-I�-t? BROWARD 1 �J 1 Z� � Z�21 Date The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of x❑ physical presence or ❑online notarization this � October 21 N. Maria Menendez, as Vice President of Na les VI Co �., �S day of , 20 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) p m� Such persons) Notary Public must check applicable box: [� Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has prod Notary Sign CP108-COA-OO115�155 REV 3/4/2020 ��''"" ''' KANDIDA RINKER JOLLAY ��wr� 1 ':�� Cornmisslon#GG345725 �'• - , �'�' Explr©s July 13, 2023 a�: ��'�;;;;%; ;,�''� I]ondnJ Tliru Troy Faln Inouranco 000.385-7018 � jj. � i° �..� Department of State /Division of Corporations /Search Records 1 Search by Enti y Name .e �. _ � ., r" � ar- ♦ � � � 1 � Filing Information Document Number FEUEIN Number Date Filed State Status Principal Address � 1111111 • 85-2678109 07/24/2020 FL ACTIVE 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PKWY STE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 Mailing Address 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PKWY STE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 Registered Agent Name &Address HELFMAN, STEVEN M 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PKWY STE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 General Partner Detail Name &Address NAPLES Vl CORPORATION 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PKWY STE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 Report Year 2021 Document Images Filed Date 04i28/2021 04/28/2021 -- ANNUAL REPORT 07/24/2020 -- Domestic LP View image in PDF format View image in PDF format DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS / 1 luPa ` T c y Department of State /Division of Corporations I Search Records I Search by Entity Name 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PARKWAY, SUITE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 Title VP, T Menendez, N. Maria 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PARKWAY, SUITE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 Title VP Arkin, Richard A. 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PARKWAY, SUITE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 Title S Helfman, Steven M. 1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PARKWAY, SUITE 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 Annual Reports Report Year 2021 Document Images Filed Date 04/26/2021 04/26/2021 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/22/2020 -- Domestic Profit _ . _ _ ..-- - -- - - ----- --- - -- ------ --_ __,_. I View image in PDF format Florida Ucparcrnent of State, C�ivision of Corporations COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Co her County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM Thisrequired form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the, responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership toot property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: c. If the property is in the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRfVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Naples VI Corporation, general partner 99% Sapphire American Holdings Corporation, limited partner 1 % 1600 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Suite 400, Sunrise FL 33312 for both entities If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officersstockholders, beneficiari , es, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, {ist all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired 9/14/2020 Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierRov.net Date of option: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX66 (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required #o have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/O re � Date N. Maria Menendez, Vice President of Naples VI Corporation, General Partner of Naples Associates V1, LLLP Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 ENSTR 5925145 OR iPG JUU8 ZLERK OF 'COURT )• ! $49,000.00 1 ZONS $71,0001000n0l) This instrument prepared by and after recording, return to: Naples Associates VI, �Li.P 1600 Sawgress Corporate Parkway, Suite 400 Sunrise, Florida 33323 Attn: Clayton M. Ratliff, Esq. 1020, by S.D. CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INCIIII a Florida corporation, as General Partner of THE VING SOUTH DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limi• partnership a Ida 34102, to NAPLES hose mailing address is 2150 Goodlette Road North, 611 Floor, Naples, Flon Florida limi•liability limited partnership ("Grantee"), whose mailing ddress is 1600 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Suite 400, Sunrise, Florida 33323, Wherever used herein, "Grantoe' and "Grantee" shall include all of the parties to this instrument and their successors he terms •. 1NtTLI ice SETH: •l1ranted, bargained • sold, and by these presents does grant, bargain .. • sell, to Grantee, anll Drantee's heirs, successors and assigns fbrever, the following property located in Collier County, Rod& the "Property"), ! • ,overnmental authority,• • but • limited i all applicable building, • use and nvironmental ordinances • regulations; •• • • (c) easements, conditions, restrictions, limitations assignsnd reservations of record, if any, but this reference shall not operate to reimpose same. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors and • • GRANTOR hereby warrants the title to the Property and will defend the same against the lawful oR 5817 PG 3009 .r kv IN WiTNE33 WHEREOi:, C3rantor has executed this Special Warranty Deed as of the day and year first above written. Witnessed by: Print Name: I �✓r°-lei Print Name: Y. ..-. STATE OF MlCH�GAN ) � ss: COUNTY OF`` S.D. GORP+C7RATIC7N OF NAPLES, INC., a Florida corporation, as General Partner of THE UVl4G SOUTH DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership M, BuckelI President f The fioi+e9oir79 ir�strulrtertt was ackr1+�W1UUVeci before me y 1�neans Vf 1. sical presery e or C online notarization, this .,..fday of September 2,020, by Robert M. Suckel, as President of S.D. CCRPORAT'ION OF NAPLES, INC., a Florida corporation, as General Partner of THE WING SOUTH DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIPPOf a Florida limjted partnership, on behalf of said entities. He is ersonall known to me or has produced ..�,.� a ��°� ` - * as identification 71 Name: << s..t My commission expires: .2 Notary Public, State of Commission No. ., Donrea R. Mason Notary Public [Notarial% eal] Presque Isle County, I ` Y Carnrnllon Elr rim n" r � .r A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 16, TOV1lNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. DESCRtF'TION OF PART' OF SECTICIN 1�, TOV'IINSHiP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALL THAT PART OF THE EAST 1�2 01= THE EAST 112 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, NORTH 89020'05" WEST 630.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 00°14' 25" EAST 170.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27035'38" EAST 456.94 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 00"14' 25" EAST 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'45'35" EAST 120.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 22°02'30" EAST 107.70 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 593, PAGE 301, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 00014' 25" EAST 1263656 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WING SOUTH PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT 111", ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 46, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE OLLOWING SIX (6) DESCRIBED COURSES. NORTH 62051 ' .69 • SOUTH • • 15 of WEST • SOUTH.47 FEET, WEST 500.00 NORTHil' • .52 FEET; • SOUTH 89`45135" WEST 132.69 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF EAST 112 • i r EAST 1/2 .. AID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 00'13'25" WEST 2028.59 FEET TO HE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89*2010511 AST 677.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED, OLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE SOUTHERLY AND THE WESTERLT 30 FEET OR ROAD RIGHTOF—WAY PURPOSES: " . • � , - y . • � sir • � � . - J • • • • . , J k** OR 5817 PG 3011 *** lwf LL THAT PART OF • . TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE • - COUNTY, LORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST Ct'�RNER �JF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, NORTH 89020'05" VVEST 260.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 593, PAGE 300, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SOUTH 0014'25" EAST 780.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 22°02'30" WEST 107.70 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89°45"35" WEST 120.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00°14'25" WEST 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27035'38" WEST 456.94 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00°14'25" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89020'-05" EAST 370.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPl.ES, FLORI DA 34104 (239 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting. please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU {Conditional Use) ❑SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP} [] FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change _ Unplatted) ❑ PNC {Project Name Change} ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans &Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP {Vegetation Removal &Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ {Standard Rezone} ❑OTHER PUDA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) Section 16, Township 50, Range 26 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 0041$640007 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties} CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (ifapplicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev, 6/9/2017 Page ') of 2 pier County COl.�IER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,coiliergov�net 280a NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPI.ES, FI.ORIDA 34104 (239j 252-2400 FAX (239j 2S2�-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium d indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: [■] Email ❑ Fax ❑ (ifi application; Personally picked up Applicant Name: Paula McMichael, Vice President, Stephanie Karol, Permitting Coordinator Phone: 239-254-2018 Email/Fax: stephaniekarolC�hmeng.com Signature On Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00418640007 . �: Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: pate; 06/15/2021 Updated by: Date: ._.. Rev, 6/9/2017 � � � � � � � � Page 2 of 2 i j { t t 1 c { Y' � i i i i i � 1 f r I 0 V. It toot At lL to I .. .1 'WL'>l:r.Ri�• _ ....-.��.-...awor I „>....�++�,I�,yw,pn,�e,P _- --.•1+'aertil�+�i-mow 1 .to►ter i•r .. r, >v�A. .I,�. w- ..1�Nt ty,•t Fr'n lam"Irv. IAr / Fdo too tto ! kill +`y�1ti� fr•..�Vv�f v. ` l'Pt` '-,Bol SI.✓^ VA do i'Y: x,. ,,• 1 `L �,t v�i- - rZ a ^w ✓ <y `, N C ``yt -t P-yri ,' h \i `��'7, ttIoo bItt 5 .'i..� 5 •y l Jx yr, _. r , % �,r ,A11• > 7. ,� .yw 1 ter,•. ,> 1 .'y .?. ' '?' • T •+'0 y "`til�y..Mo, ,"„1V4`�tir. .•it'f�.: tom. %.a< 1►'. S,.%�Tt 1 - �i t Vi V • 'tom � . �i► Y t l '� ? r� ~ ., ki t t to 3 r.*1 V l�' ✓-3• 3it ATT Hlitj w I two, It It tol Of aft tool got i `oV4 Als — -Iri ,rr a V IF r so w IF . r I ZIPs u' It �. I AL wr 1 �+ Iop It tb , Ira P 3 a. ^ f to I. Pot*9 dro its Itr . Ja,D ; v { L. • r✓f '1' �7r -I isooviIII it. up W, MMMWMWM- `tow Ilt! If r �?It to POP A, ka Atli a Ile do. } i �f%i� 3'� •. !v tire. r •. .v a� ;.'` tic of I oil did 4 lit, i,. 5; 1• toot000t It 1 •'a'n.ak�j. 1a'1-� tif:�t��,� s•'- ai�Y �� • a>�. to fir✓+� Y�y \ ti,� +r•+ , r .. - - .+!'b' �y f''6�t.� w` 'T T .�>,i�.i:y. •a�'''ti•e _4'?. tc wil Aw it t too, 44111, it jy I.04 tot, for ? Art o At 1 rt r ^oe-,&111 It ,r Wit If I lot ow o It to oll Ida to oproo ld,g.C•t Ito qF _ IF IT low III tot It if wr foll, It toll It I It Art Co..y , It 1 , air`+'• . t r ` 1 loop f I riot it WOW 67 1 It lo, or C `A _AM 1- 7 Fit VMS,1L7r LjL' !' ' '_ Ra t �It ob- AL - . 1 'iVYV C'rr , • i l 1 1 1 � A' Narrative Statement, LDC Evaluation Criteria, and GMP Consistency I. History and Narrative The Sliadowwood PUD, approved by Ordinance 82-49, and subsequently amended by Ordinances 0843 and 2047, is located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive approximately three quarters of a mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The ShadowWood PUD is �168.10 acres, and allows for single and multi -family residential, and a private air park. The property is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Surrounding land uses to Tract E include residential development to the north, south, east, and west. There is an undeveloped parcel to the east zoned CFPUD (LASIP Conservation Area); and an undeveloped parcel to the north zoned A — Agricultural. Tract E (as depicted on the Master Plan) is �77.98 acres and located. east of Polly Avenue, in the northern portion of the PUD. This PUDA proposes to add a potential interconnection with the Sandy Lane RPUD to the north of Tract E, to clarify and add development commitments, and to add five deviations specific to Tract E. II. LDC Evaluation Criteria A. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. This amendment request will not place an additional burden on the surrounding area, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water and other utilities. This amendment request seeks to modify the Master Plan by adding a potential interconnection with the Sandy Lane RPUD to the north of Tract E. The additional interconnection will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area. The new interconnection will better serve the residents within both the Shadowwood PUD and the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD, as well as the surrounding community. The proposed interconnection will be a resident -only connection and will allow residents of Shadowwood Tract E to access Santa Barbara Blvd through the Sandy Lane RPUD Should the interconnection to the Sandy Lane RPUD be built, the approved connection to Polly Avenue will either be removed or not constructed, reducing traffic into the surrounding community. B. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they Page 1 of 4 H:\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 6-22-2022).docx may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The property is under the ownership of a single entity as evidenc unified control provided with this application. ed by the evidence of C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -District, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub - District, policy or other provision.) 1. Compliance with additional GMP provisions. Policy 5.4 —New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 0441, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended.) The scope of this amendment will not impact the previously determined compatibility of the PUD land uses with the surrounding land uses. No new land uses are proposed. Policy 7.1 -The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code, Policy 7.2 -The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Policies 7.1-7.3 are further supported with. the proposed amendment by providing an interconnection that will allow residents within the Shadowvvood PUD to access Santa Barbara Blvd through the Sandy Lane RPUD. The additional potential access to the development to the north will allow for a greater dispersal of traffic and provide motorists within the development more options. Page 2 of 4 H:\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 6-22-2022).docx Policy 7.4 -The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The proposed amendment to the PUD Master all will not impact this policy. D. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed amendment to the PUD Master Plan will not impact the compatibility of proposed uses, as no change in uses are proposed at this time. E. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as propos development. ed to serve the The PUD will provide adequate usable open space and no changes to open space is proposed. F. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The county charges impact fees (or similar fees) to ensure that there is funding to make any necessary capacity improvements related to sewer and water services, roads, public schools, government buildings including jails, regional and community parks, EMS, libraries, and law enforcement. The developer will be responsible for the cost of any site -related improvements, including but not limited to access improvements and conveyance related improvements to the water and/or sewer distribution system. There will be a requirement to demonstrate "concurrency" at the time of future subdivision plats or Site Development Plans) for this project. (The concurrency process ensures that the County has the capacity for Category "A" public facilities and services at the time that project related impacts will affect (require) such services and facilities.) Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in the various elements of the Collier County GMP, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. G. The ability expansion. of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate There are no issues that would limit the ability of the subject property or the surrounding areas to accommodate this project. H. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications Page 3 of 4 H:\2021\2021015\wP\PUDA\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 6-22-2022).docx of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The PUD conforms to the LDC regulations, or contains deviations therefrom, where appropriate. Page 4 of 4 H:\2021\2021415\WP\PUDA\2nd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 6-22-2022).docx p , F DEVIATIONS and JUSTIFICATIONS Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.A., which requires a landscape buffer along the eastern PUD boundary associated with the private airstrip to allow no buffer. Given the adj acent, offsite preserve abutting the easterly PUD boundary, no landscape buffer is required. Justification: This deviation was previously approved. Deviation # 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.O1.N, which requires a minimum 60-foot right -of --way width for local roads, to allow that private roadways shall have a minimum 50400t right -of --way width per Exhibit C-1, Tract E, Cross Section, Justification: This deviation has been granted for many projects where the roads will remain private. There is adequate width in a SO foot right-of-way for a private, local road to allow for all necessary utilities, sidewalks, and travel lanes. Across -section has been provided in support of this deviation. Deviation # 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, Table 2.4, which requires each property to provide a buffer, to allow for no landscape buffer between Shadowwood PUD Tract E and the development to the north, provided the properties have a roadway connection as shown on the Master Plan and are developed by the same developer as a unified development, entirely with single-family dwellings, submitted under one PPL. Justification: If Shadowwood PUD Tract E and the development to the north (proposed Sandy Lane RPUD) are developed as one continuous development, there is no potential incompatibility between the sites as they will be part of one, unified development with consistent architecture and landscaping. Deviation # 4 requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.04.04.B.S.c., which provides that a maximum of five model homes, or a number corresponding to ten percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted, approved development, shall be permitted prior to final plat approval, to allow for up to 16 model homes and a sales center to be permitted in Tract E of the RPUD. Each time the developer applies for a model building permit, it shall be required to inform the County how many model homes have been permitted.. Justification: The experience of the developer is that given the maximum number of dwelling units and the variety of housing types, a larger number of model homes is supported. This has been approved for a number of PUDs. Page 1 of 3 H:\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\3rd Resubmitta]\Deviation &Justification (rev 8-12-2022).docx Deviation # SA requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.06.02.B.S.a On Premise Directional Sign, which allows on -premises directional signs be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of roadway, paved surface, or back of curb, to allow a setback of five feet from a roadway or platted easement, excluding public roadways, providing it does not result in public safety concerns or obscure visibility of the motoring traffic, as determined by the County Manager or designee. Justification: This deviation will allow flexibility in locating the directional signs to be sure that they are clearly visible while maintaining public safety. Deviation # SB requests relief from LDC Sec. 5.06.02.B.S.c.i On Premise Directional Sign, which Rows one on premise directional sign with a maximum area of 24 square feet and a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow all directional signs to a maximum area of 24 square feet and maximum height of 8 feet. Justification: The PUD will be comprised of a number of sub -communities and this deviation will allow residents and guests to more easily navigate the neighborhood. The signs will only be visible to residents and visitors to the community. Deviation # 6 requests relief from LDC Sec. 3.05.10 Littoral Shelf Planting Area (LSPA), Paragraph A. Lb. which requires that 7 percent of the total area of a lake, measured at the control elevation, be provided as LSPA, to instead allow 0 percent. Justification: Shadowwood Tract E is located to the west of the Wing South Airpark, a private runway. While not an airport and not subject to the AirportAuthority or the FAA, the applicant has been approached by members of Wing South Airpark requesting that littoral areas be avoided if possible to reduce the risk of attracting wildlife, specifically birds, to the air strip. This is consistent with the guidance of LDC Sec. 4.02.06, Standards for Development within the Airport Overlay (APO), Paragraph N. Airport land use restrictions, subparagraph 7, which is specific to landfills but specifies that "The landfill operator must incorporate bird management techniques or other practices to minimize bird hazards to airborne aircraft. "It is also consistent with technical guidance from the FAA ("Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports, A Manual for Airport Personnel," July 2005) and the USDA ("Wildlife at Airports," Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series, February 2017). As stated in the FAA Advisory Circular, Sec. 2.3.2, in order "to facilitate the control of hazardous wildlife, the FAA recommends the use of steep -sided, rip -rap or concrete lined, narrow, linear -shaped water detention basins." and All vegetation in or around detention basins that provide food or cover, for hazardous wildlife should be eliminated. " Page 2 of 3 H:\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\3rd Resubmittal\Deviation &Justification (rev 8-12-2022).docx Deviation it 7 requests relief from LDC Section 6.06.01 Street System Requirements, Paragraph J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to instead allow dead -ends on internal roadways provided the dead-end portion of the street does not exceed 150 feet. Justification: Only a small number of lots will be accessed from the internal dead-end roadways, and a full cul-de-sac is not necessary in order to provide safe access to these lots or to protect public health, safety, and welfare. The project must still comply with the Fire Code, and turnaround sufficient for the turn radius of emergency vehicles is being provided. Page 3 of 3 H:\2021\2021015\WP\PUDA\3rd Resubmittal\Deviation & Justification (rev 8-12-2022).docx Stephanie Karol From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hi Paula, BellowsRay � Ray,Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Friday, october 8, 2021 1:53 PM Paula McMichael FinnTimothy FVV: Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) - PL20210001253 -survey Survey (Shadowwood) 09.14.2020.pdf The attached boundary survey can be used for the above referenced application since nothing has changed since it was last used. Respectfully, �� Raymond v. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division -Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.635� Exceeding expectations, every day. Tel! us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey of https._.://aoo.al/eXjvgT. From: Paula McMichael <PaulaMcMichael�hmeng.com> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2021 1:25 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows�colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Shadowwood PUD (PUDA) - P1.20210001253 -survey E` .:�� 'Ql H i Ray, Are olc with us submitting the attached boundary survey for the above referenced application. Nothing has changed since when this was done about a year ago. Thank you, Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President, Planning Services 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Main Line: (239} 254-2000 Facsimile: �239} 254-2099 paulamcmichael�hmeng.ca . _ ...... iti ` ��T .. �. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. GRAPLuc scALE o ,ao fat .m t a •===1 1 taeb - WO K FOUND 1" PIPE NORTH 1/4 CORNER SEC-t r .............- i/ (NO (D) Se8'24'16;.DO' (P) s6s'sYIJt (((777a.t4' (AI l FWND 4ir4' --- --- •.r ^� CONCRETE MONUMENT W (NO 10) 0.2Go N ' N o h40 j� 6' CtWNLBIK wr n -. QO FENCE a NW 114 c NW 114 -- •-.• - n n NE 114 - b9 b FOUND 4 x4" Z Z CONCRETE MONUMENT (NO 10) In In. NN ' h O �g .�..c"`.._ ALSO FDtXiO BROKEN . - 2 N89"2 J 29 653 Bs' C) CONCRETE MONUMENT a N N a � I N89"?2'w w &AU.53' (M) rw PERPETUAL. MON-VICLUShE' - N DRMMAG& ACCESS ANDee m m 6' f1WNLMK MQNTE'6AII EA;E'IIENU' I a - O.R. 5209 P0. 1210 ,- - FOUND 5/8' - FOUND AWL I I ( n 10 : REE AR (NO ID) t +DISK STAMPED ... AB8-LB J664 Z SET 5/8'' 1b POLING 5/B' I :'�REBAR at - REBAR (NO"r0) .' STAMPED LH 7705 ND 5/8" I ADK/MS AM (IMPFiOVm) 4 ('3 _ V �i RE84R (NO ID) T CORNER FALLS I $89.42xQ4w Jr �' (P) SW4Z C 40W 19c3 ' (P) , IN WATER l SW42 13iV 500"J8. "(M) S89'37'16wW 1930 ' (M) NOTHING FOUND - FOUND 5/B" NOTHING SET i POUND at RE9AR A CAP STAMPED . - :... .. •V l ALSO FOUND - A98 LB 3664 LINE TABLE - - .. t• l 5/8" REBAR BENT ALSO FOUND' UN£ DEARINC DISTANCE STAMPED S 0.tJ5, W"0.B3' S/8" Rl M t CAP( F-043, Lt (P) N62.55'091V 141.69' I N 0.23' E 0.64' - I ( I 55' Z57DAME DRANIAGE ACCESS t MAINTENANCE-__•' - 11(M) N6T55'0A V 141.76' - EAS£MENT' (PER O.R. 5209 L2(P) S62'09$221Y 108.47If I I I PG. 1209) l2(M) S6T08'40^* 108.52' l I• FOUND 5/8" L3(P) NOO"17'S6iV 16.48' REBAR (NO lD) - - - - -� - - - LJ(M) Nt7tT17*491V 16.52' - - - L4(P) S59*421`I 132,690 - L4(M) S89'4219"W d^ S89 24'J8e>: 2324.60' (M) U POINT 6E BEWd>WC sas"25'141� 2324.48' (v) SW2040SI: 6773Y a) � (7RAcr e7 s�z0'osZ 877.2Y (D) 4 NIV25741V 37aaa• (D) Nar254.194w T93a.49' (S) AMI_ ser25'7eT 3a4,00 (P), _--_ Nffr25J9w 19J0.49• (Y- ---� v�$ --e nr " - - N _ - - ' W ' xf ! _y- B SET 5/8 DRMHMeE �UCCESS ANDAND:: )- FOUND 4 OONCRETE MONUdIiIT tA= .; RESAR At CAP AWNIDANC£ FASEktOQ ,qNo. 25DWE VIAo (ILLEGIBLE) STAMPED 7705 (PER- OR.552O9 PG. 11204) - �r ib. _ _ ' AMPALB NOWN.... SHADOWWOOD NE i14 PU NW 114 I r NE 114 REBAR 4.-CAP . STAMPED &WKSENG 1It/1 / d IVCtl+( Kt.NtJ !Mi' KWED N89"2� saw s2 ss• N89'23'441V 623 3i (M) SE 1 /4 N . - TRACT E"� n i SHADOWWOOD: NW 114 su arena E nor �o Nz TIT7 PUD Si2 NE 1/4 2 vY4dY: ..19• Tel . - \I PERPETUAL,�ioN-EXLYUSVE-"' < DRIIAAI ACCESS AND" 14 M4NTGANCE EASEMENT TOP OF a NK f FARM Ale. 2MIlAheE at I'10 tp -' (PER OR 5209 PQ--1210) (( I o o PARCEL 10 `~ �► 00416640007 P � ,4• WIRE- T•n FOUND 4"s4" ; ONCR£TE MONUMENT "'.. PENCEsET.-5STAMPED REW 7705t GP I PENC0,51 E EAST 1/4 iNonfrNG CORNER FOUND, NOTHING SET 1 Fr.AI DES[RiPTfaN P£TT TTTLF GOMMI7M�Nf NO.'8613259 NBgS A PARCfc Of LAND LYING II SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 1. Last day of field work is August 25th, 2020 (date o survey). SOUTIL RANG£ 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY• FLORIDA 2. Bearings shown hereon am based on the West rim or the NE 114 of Section 16 of QfSC>bPiION OF' PART OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUIil, Township 50 South, Range 26 fast according to the Pict thereof, as located in Stota Plane RANCX 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA coordinate system Florida East Zone, NAD 83. 2011 adjustment, being NOO'17'321Y Rotated hTMn Pint b1O^'ng xindow w CO1^'te^"d°ckw{se 00'a6'ta' ALL THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 Or THE EAST 112 OF 3. No easement scorch or abstracting was done by the surveyor and note should be taken that SECRON 16, TONNSMP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER this property is subject to any facts that may be revealed with a full and accurate title COUYfY; FI.OfaW AND BDA4 MORE PAR77CVLARLY DESCRIBED search. Unless otherwise inckcated oil easements shown hereon are based on plot am based FOLLOWS: or, plat and that tills commitment prepared by Chicago Tito Insurance Company bearing order LOMYDICAIG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION number 5613259 and a commitment date of August 21. 2020 at II.W P.A1, and (hot the 1Q 7HfEltCE ALONG TIE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 160 description therein Is the same as the description shown on the survey. Described Parcels am IJORJH 8r20'QS" WEST 5J0.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF Contiguous. (TEGIINING OF THL PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBES): THENCE 4. The intended use of Buis survwy is to serve as an onaysis toot for due dX9soce purposes. SOUTH 00'7425" LAST 170,00 FEET; 5. Only above ground, visible and apparent improvements wam located. Irrigation equipment was iNENC£ SOUTH I7W35038" EAST 456.94 I=; not taken Into account on this survey. THENCE SOtIiTf O71425" EAST 110.00 FEE'T, 6. Foundations and overhangs am not token into account on this survey. THENCE NORTH 8945 J5" EAST 120.00 FEET, 7. Rear tie dimensions shorn are to the property lino. Building ties reflect distances to the 1HETvCE SOUDf 12'02J(T' EAST 107.70 FEET TO THE WEST finish surface of the structure and may not be rejawentotive of foundations or primary LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TA WY EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN walls. O.R. 593 PACE J01, COLDER CDUNTY PUULAC RECORDS 8. No environmental study, audit or determinations wart mode in this survey. Any COLLIER COUNTY, FLDRIDI THENCE ALONG S40 WEST LINE environmental conditions that may be depicted on this survey ore the result of simple saURf OP1423" EAST 1253.56 FEET TD THE NORTHERLY observation and not the resuk of a scientific analysis. LtN£ OF MNC SOUTH PRIMATE VILLAS t1101i 1" ACCORDIIO 70 9. No other persons or entities other than thou listed as exclusive users may rely on this PUT IHER£OF AS RECORDED IN mf4DOdnblUAI PLAT BOOK <, survey. PAGE 46, CO(L£R COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS COLDER 10, AN dimensions am in feat and decimals (hemI unleu otherwise noted, COLNIIY, FTaFaDt THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE ftXLOW'INC SIX (5) DESCRIBED COURSES: It. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. i) SOUTH (tr45 J5" WEST 193.02 FEEr•- 12. Property falls in flood lone :i£" base flood elevation 9'0 as shown hereon, according to the Federal Ernergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Number 2) NORRf 6751*110 WEST /41.69 FEET- 12021C0602H, Community Number 120067, Panel 0602. Sufrrr H, dated May 16, 2a12. J) SONH 6711'I5' W£St 10ti <7 FEET: 13, According to Collier County loom mop viewer posted o. this property zoned 4) 35, W£57 500.00 fE'ET,� 2.01,coffiergay.net a PUD� Per Ca6isr land Development Code in Section 4.02.01, Table 2.21 setbacks tTm as 5) NORTH 00'1425' WEST 16.52 FEET,- fakoWs: 6) SOUTH 8945435" WEST 132.69 FEET TO THE WEST LANE Zoning information is provided for informational purposes only and is subject to variances SECTION 16- OF THI£ FAST t/2 OF T7ff FitS7 1/1 OF SAID SEC fore making rovfdad to the survey" 9 any p rveyor consult count codas be and ache conditions not Y 1HENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 00'1325" *EST decisions regarding setbaAts. MI standard setback criteria is subject to interpretation. 2o2d.59 FEET ro THE NORTH LAC OF SAID SECTION 16m 14, Property contains 7498 acres (3.396,906 square feet) more or less. THENCE AtONrr SAID NORTH LIVE satilm 89'20•a5" EAST 75. Property is and duo to rock o1 via67r1y through the site, improvements that 6771J FEET ro THE PONT OF BEr,.AWIfO OF THE PARCEL artort may exist, aim not apparent may exist NtREw 15. Property is alkeeNy, adjacent to the Poty Aventer, Whitaker Pood and Adkins Avenue right of ways. AND THE NORTTIW£ST ONE-O mfrft (114) Or THE NORTHW£5T 17. This survey meets those standards contained in Chapter S.h17. Florida Adminions ive Code, Florida ONf-Ot1ARIFR (r14) OF THE NORTHEAST GNE-0UAII Statutes, (1/r) OF sECTK7N f6. roWNSMP 50 SMITH, RANGE 25 EAST, catiER COUNTR: FLORIOk LESS THE SOUTHERLY AND ifrE WES7ERiY Jt1 FEET DIREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURP0.5ES Applicable Items from Chicago Title Insurance AVD Company Order Number: 8613259 lilt N13RTHFAST ONEOLwtTER (114) OF THE NORTHMESr Schedule 6-lt Exceptions QYE-OU4R7ER (114) or THE NORTHEAST ONE-OUARTER (I/4) OF SEC1)ON 14 TOWNSHIP So SOUTH, RANGE 26 E4ST. Izx.LCR COIAVrY. FLORII a aa, an and A Ant r.sovo6ons set far" rn hero Deed nvm the Board of Edacatbn of the State of narde recorded in Deed 6dok 1 nee Erb. Now The coverage of ang ALTA 9-M. 9.1-M 9.2-6, 9.3-06 or ,trtD simAnr endamornerd aNahad to Ves poky w not opolkable to the wegef:on. Notc he cord reservations homn were rehoased in OfGcid term Lug-._ _09 Mae zs7_ - ganM o Nature ant Pretteha 7H£ SOLI7HEASf ONE-OCYRJER (1/<) OF THE NORTHWEST QNE-QUARTER (t14) OF THE NaffrWAST OAC-QUARTER 6. krlenUwmry Dwrsted IEv TOWN99P 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 7, terms, C*wwwntk eereliaw and other mends contained kn as Agrwernnsnt of Fur"sr Aserxawe by That EAST: COLDER COUNTR: FLORCO: RaoNry, Ltd recorded in atriciat ffintords awk 937 Free 11115 A Portion Subject to shown ax AND ALL 11Mi PART" OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 30 SOUDC RANGE d k,t.rtioray Deleted T6 6ASY COLIIER COUNTY FLORIDA AND BEING MORE 9. Non-ExclueNe Emwmwa ry unify purpewes Vented to Who South Amork Private Allow, hC rwmrthd F 071clof PAROCUTARLY DESCRIBED As FOLLOWS: Reeards &I IZSI91Ie 1i4 - Matte! in Nature Nat Pk)tI CW7MENCaIG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAD SEC77ON l0. Toni. eo.rantr• condUorw and a~ matters contained in the Sanwrwd Arwrwrts attached OF EudklWw 16, it1ENC£ ALONG T74E NORM LAC OF SAID SECTION 15, C and D to Ike kAtru rnent recorded in 00 Id Records Book 064, Pogo 51, includIng the rsdprocd oeownnenh N0R1H 8r-20'-QS" WEST 260.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF M forth awrn 9anket N rwdure, nat ydtabrs. BEGMAINK' TH£ PARCEL HERON DESCRIBED: 17ffHCE ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY 1 t. Moreienesy Dented FASEIfENT AS DESCRIBED BI O.R. 59J PAGE JM COWER 12 Eesonw4s for dmi;I oocev and mdntmance vexled ;n Wv r Covnb by "e Onim of Tokip recorded in rA(Rf7Y PUBLIC RECORDS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORMA SOUTH nor;d RA•+.. �- Rook _xw erase 1200 and 0f7Te(d Recnnfx Book SB0Pnne 744n- Platted O'-r4'-25' FAST 780,00 FEET, oofrO ter" k, d me Booty or county CNo %* oca d Gounfito Non Na. 20rwitt /S Awakhx THENCE NORM 22-02'-30' NEST 107.70 fE1:T, tr D" lto Fhvdq rogorG+wC Solid Waste fAei;e+pal Soiree !fit UNL Sam'et pxMet Na. 1, reeor0ed h orte B 1H/ENCE SOUTH 84'-r5 =J5" WEST 120.00 FIrre Beak S314 Face 776. and mwalutiens in [aria•.! Rea•-•" Reds 9552 Pona t76T Are Orr c,r Rec..,.da Rook 567E Peer 112n 8bwkst to Nature Nat Plattab4. THENCE NORM OR-14'-25" WEST 110.00 FEET,• THENCE NORTH 1r-JS'-38' WEST 456.94 FELT• THENCE NORM 00'-14'-25" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE NaRM 11NE QF' SAID SECTION 160 THENCE ALONG SAO NORTH UNf SOUTH 89'-20'-OS' EAST J70.00 FEET To nE POINT OF bEC1NNPK. OF THE PARCEL HERON DESCRIBED. dBBBEb8II4di (M) MEtSURED (C) er CALCVUTcD DOG/ er DOCUMENT NUMBER EL ELEVAT70N OFFlCAL RECORDS BOOK PC. � PAGE ORMNAGE AREA MAINTENANCE EASEMENT CB >< CONDOMINIUM BOOK C£RTBTED CORNER RECORD 15' WiDE TEMPORARY 40' W1DE TEMPORARY I CONSiRUC7TON : CONSTRUC710N �.. EASEMENT (PER O.R. EASEMENT (PER O.R. o m 5209 PG. 1212) /' - - cwj 3209 PG. 1213) m "I f I r -T------L---� ---- -----1 -------- ® l-'-----)=---------------------------------=------- --. 5m TOP OF -I SANK TOP OF -- .BANK IMPROVEMENTS INDICATE APPARENT (a PHYSII GRAPHIC SCATS -- _ +m It >W HIIS,i SKYWAY DR. 1 feel 50 tL SL�FACE LE[•END ASPHALT ® UM£ RtH:K uNElYPE LEGEND PLAT BOUNDARY ---- SECHON LINE00 1. REMOVED SStMNY DAYS lv1N0 TRUST l//OfR DECLARATION OF LAND TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 15. 2018" FROM CERTTF1CATtONS PER L7�15 FArxV1.; CkfM 1/14/19 2. REVISED REIaSrON NOTE T AND ADD F(/0" 70 TRACT �" s/t400WiV170D AND A/RPARK NORTH SHADOWWVOD PER CL1aJT.- 3/2712019 3. UPDATE SURVEY; R.Y., FS 208, PG 15, WO 120-<91, ate/2s/zozo. 4. ADDRESS CLIENT COMMENTS, R.Y., 0911112020. cvitR�FrM QJ CONCRETE POWER POLE y%' WDOD POWER POE£ EIp WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT ® CABLE RtSER ® TELEPHONE RlSETi -,T SIGN HFADWi4LL ® GRATE lf4t£f DRAINAC£ MANHOLE For the Frcrusivr Use Dh. C.L Acquisitions Corporation Ctieago 1TBe hsuroneb Company Gaen6eq Trourig, PA NaplDavid J. es Assorjcfes N, LLLP}, o Florida Gmitad IwfahYy IrrsTed parfrterahip. David J. H att Digitally signed by David Y J. Hyatt PSM #5834 PSM #5834 ' 15:100�04 la Florida License No. 5834 I, Not valid with the signature and anginal seal of the FTorfdo Licensed Professiarw/ Surveyor and Mapper Cartificota of Authorization 17705. Stephanie Karol From: Blanco, Pedro (FAA) <Pedro.Blanco@faa.gov> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 4:12 PM To: John Asher Cc: Paula McMichael; Ritchey, Krystal (FAA); Green, Peter M (FAA) Subject: RE: Collier County Zoning Issue - Elimination of Littoral Planting Shelves to Avoid Bird Conflicts You don't often get email from pedro.blanco@faa.gov. Learn whY this is important Good afternoon, Mr. Asher: Thanks for your correspondence and patience. While we agree with your statement about the avoidance of wildlife hazards on or near airports such as manmade ponds, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has no jurisdiction over privately owned / private -use airports, which mainly requires conformance with 14 CR Part 157, Notice of Construction, Alteration, Activation and Deactivation. However, it is important to understand that FAA's main objective within our mission is SAFETY; therefore, we strongly recommend for any airport to adhere to FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5200-33C -Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or near Airports. As stated in this document, the recommendations of this AC are also applicable to land -use planners, operators of non -certificated airports, and developers of projects, facilities, and activities on or near airports. As an option, you may want to contact the FDOT Central Office for other State requirements, if any. Here is their main website https://www.fdot.govaviation default.shtm. Best regards, Pedro Blanco FAA Orlando ADO 407-487-7230 From: John Asher <John.Asher@glhomes.com> Sent: Friday, May 27I 2022 3:40 PM To: Ritchey, Krystal (FAA) <Krystal.Ritchey@faa.gov>; Blanco, Pedro (FAA) <Pedro,Blanco @faa.gov>; Green, Peter M (FAA) <peter.m.green@faa.gov> Cc: Paula McMichael <paulamcmichael@hmeng.com> Subject: RE: Collier County Zoning Issue-EliminationofLittoral Planting Shelves to Avoid Bird Conflicts Krystal, Pedro and/or Peter, Please see my email below. We desperately need correspondence from the FFA indicating that constructing littoral planting shelves (flat la{<e banks) and installing aquatic plants that will attract bird and other wildlife in residential lakes next to airports is a bad idea. Can you help? John Asher, PE 239-293-4220 From: John Asher Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 4:46 PM To: krvstal.ritche faa. ov; edro.blanco faa.gove peter.rn green_@faa.gov Cc: Paula McMichael <paulamcmichaeltc Hmeng.com> Subject: Collier County Zoning Issue - Elimination of Littoral Planting Shelves to Avoid Bird Conflicts I'm not sure who to address this request to so I have included all the contact information I could find for Naples, Collier County. We are in the process of amending a zoning approval for a project in Collier County (Naples), Florida. The project is located immediately west and adjacent to the private airstrip referred to a Wing South Airpark. FA37 WING SOUTH AI RPARK ADDIS 122.9 - 18N 36S -130 CYPRESS VOR 4.6 DESIGNATOR FA37 108.6 FREQUENCY. Based on concerns expressed by the pilots and residents of Wing South we are trying to eliminate the requirement to install littoral planting shelves in the lakes so that there is less chance of attracting birds and the potential for bird — plane collision. This should be a simple and obvious request to approve, but one of the environmental reviewers has indicated that he will not support the request because there is other property designated a "preserve" surrounding the airpark, so our littoral areas won't make that much difference. I have attached an aerial site plan showing our site and the proposed lakes (in blue) in relation to the airpark property, highlighted in yellow. Would it be possible to provide a letter from the FAA recommending that anything that can be done to avoid attracting wildlife and specifically birds to the vicinity of planes and an airstrip should be approved unequivocally. There may be surrounding wetlands and lakes that can attract birds, but why take a chance and make a potential problem worse? As a professional engineer it is our duty to protect the health safety and welfare of the public, so not trying to eliminate the littoral planting shelves will be a horrible ethical misstep. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. John Asher, PE 239-293-4220 r� U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or near Airports 1 Purpose. ircu Date: 02/21 /2020 Initiated By: AAS-300 AC No: 150/5200-33C Change: This Advisory Circular (AC) provides guidance on certain land uses that have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public -use airports. It also discusses airport development projects (including airport construction, expansion, and renovation) affecting aircraft movement near hazardous wildlife attractants. Appendix provides definitions of terms used in this AC. 2 Cancellation. This AC cancels AC 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or near Airports, dated August 28, 2007. 3 Application. The Federal. Aviation Administration recommends the guidance in this AC for land uses that have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public -use airports. This AC does not constitute a regulation, is not mandatory, and is not legally binding in its own right. It will not be relied upon as a separate basis by the FAA for affirmative enforcement action or other administrative penalty. Conformity with this AC is voluntary, and nonconformity will not affect rights and obligations under existing statutes and regulations, except as follows: l . Airports that hold Airport Operating Certificates issued under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139, Certification of Airports, Subpart D, may use the standards, practices and recommendations contained in this AC as one, but not the only, acceptable means of compliance with the wildlife hazard management requirements of Part 139. 2. The FAA recommends the guidance in this AC for airports that receive funding under Federal grant assistance programs, including the Airport Improvement Program. See Grant Assurance #34. 2/2 l /2020 AC 150/5200-33C 3 . The FAA recommends the guidance in this AC for prof ects funded by the Passenger Facility Charge program. See PFC Assurance #9. 4. The FAA recommends the guidance in this AC for land -use planners and developers of projects, facilities, and activities on or near airports. 4 Principal Changes. Changes are marked with vertical bars in the margin. Change in this AC include: 1. Clarification by the FAA that non -certificated airports are recommended to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (Assessment) or a Wildlife Hazard Site Visit (Site Visit); 2. Table 1, Ranking of Hazardous Species, has been moved to Advisory Circular 150/5200-32, Reporting Wildlife Aircraft Strikes (5/31/2013); 3. Consolidation and reorganization of discussion. on land uses of concern; and updated procedures for evaluation and mitigation. Discussion addresses off -airport hazardous wildlife attractants, followed by discussion of on -airport attractants. It also clarifies language regarding the applicability of the AC. 5 Background. 1. Information about the risks posed to aircraft by certain wildlife species has increased a great deal in recent years. Improved reporting, studies, documentation, and statistics clearly show that aircraft collisions with birds and other wildlife are a serious economic and public safety problem. While many species of wildlife can pose a risk' to aircraft safety, they are not equally hazardous2. These hazard rankings can help focus hazardous wildlife management efforts on those species or groups that represent the greatest risk to safe air and ground operations in the airport environment. Used in conjunction with a site -specific Assessment that will determine the relative abundance and use patterns of wildlife species, these rankings combined with a systematic risk analysis can help airport operators better understand the general threat level (and consequences) of certain wildlife species. Also, the rankings can assist with the creation of a "high risk" list of hazardous species that warrant immediate attention. 2. Most public -use airports have large tracts of open, undeveloped land that provide added margins of safety and. noise mitigation. These areas can also present potential hazards to aviation if they encourage wildlife to enter an airport's approach or departure airspace or aircraft operations area. Constructed or natural areas such as 1 Risk is the relationship between the severity and probability of a threat. It is the product of hazard level and abundance in the critical airspace, and is thus defined as the probability of a damaging strike with a given species. 2 Hazardous wildlife are species of wildlife (birds, mammals, reptiles), including feral and domesticated animals, not under control that may pose a direct hazard to aviation (i.e., strike risk to aircraft) or an indirect hazard such as an attractant to other wildlife that pose a strike hazard or are causing structural damage to airport facilities (e.g., burrowing, nesting, perching). 00 11 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C poorly drained locations, detention/retention ponds, roosting habitats on buildings, landscaping, odor -causing rotting organic matter (putrescible waste) disposal operations, wastewater treatment plants, agricultural or aquaculture activities, surface mining, wetlands, or some conservation -based land uses can provide wildlife with ideal locations for feeding, loafing, reproduction, and escape. Even small facilities, such as fast food restaurants, taxicab staging areas, rental car facilities, aircraft viewing areas, and public parks, can produce substantial attractions for hazardous wildlife. 3. During the past century, wildlife -aircraft strikes have resulted in the loss of hundreds of lives worldwide, as well as billions of dollars in aircraft damage. Hazardous wildlife attractants on and near airports can jeopardize future airport expansion, making proper community land -use planning essential. This AC provides airport operators and those parties with whom they cooperate with the guidance they need to assess and address potentially hazardous wildlife attractants when locating new facilities and implementing certain land -use practices on or near public -use airports. 6 Memorandum of Agreement Between Federal Resource Agencies. The FAA, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and wildlife Service, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture - wildlife Services signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to acknowledge their respective missions in protecting aviation from wildlife hazards. Through the MOA, the agencies established procedures necessary to coordinate their missions to address more effectively existing and future environmental conditions contributing to collisions between wildlife and aircraft (wiIdlife strikes) throughout the United States. These efforts are intended to minimize wildlife risks to aviation and human safety while protecting the Nation's valuable environmental resources. 7 Feedback on this AC. If you have suggestions for improving this AC, you may use the Advisory Circular Feedback form at the end of this AC. Director of Airport Safety and Standards 111 2/21 /2020 CONTENTS Paragraph AC 150/, 'UU-J3C Chapter 1. General Separation Criteria for Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or NearAirports.........................................................................................................1 1 1.1 Introductlon................................................................................................................. 1-1 ' 1-1 1.2 Airports Serving Piston -Powered Alrcraft............................................................... 1 ' 1-2 .3 Airports Serving Turbine -Powered Aircraft............................................................ 1.4 Protection of Approach, Departure, and Circling Airspace. .................................. 1-2 Chapter 2. Land -Use Practices on or Near Airports that Potentially Attract Hazardous Wildlife. 31 x a a K a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 a a a is a a a a a a 0 a 0 K a a a 2wal 2.1 General......................................................................................................................... 2-1 ' 2-2 2.2 Waste Disposal Operations........................................................................................ 2.3 Water Management Facilities. 24 2.4 Wetlands......................................................................................................................2-8 2.5 Dredge Spoil Containment Areas............................................................................ 2-10 2.6 Agricultural Activities.............................................................................................. 2-10 2.7 Aquaculture...............................................................................................................242 2.8 Golf Courses, Landscaping, Structures and Other Land -Use Considerations... 244 2.9 Habitat for State and Federally -Listed Species on Airports.. ............................... 246 2.10 Synergistic Effects of Surrounding Land Uses ....................................................... 247 Chapter 3. Procedures for Wildlife Hazard Management by Operators of Public - Use Airports and Conditions for Non -Certificated Airports to Conduct Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Wildlife Hazard Site Visits ........................................ 3-1 3.1 Introduction ..... .. ..... .. .. .. .. .... . 34 3.2 Coordination with Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologists ........................................ 3-1 3.3 Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports: A Manual For Airport Personnel..... 3-1 3.4 Wildlife Hazard Site Visits and Wildlife Hazard Assessments. 3-2 3.5 Wildlife Hazard Management Plan..... 0000000000000 3-2 3.6 Local Coordination..................................................................................................... 3-3 3.7 Operational Notifications of Wildlife Hazards......................................................... 3-3 3.8 Federal and State Depredation Permits.................................................................... 3-4 iv 2/21 /2020 AC 15 0/5200-3 3 C Chapter 4. Recommended Procedures for the FAA, Airport Operators and Other Government Entities Regarding Off -A irport Attractants ................................... 4-1 4.1 FAA Notification and Review of Proposed Land -Use Practice Changes in the Vicinity of Public -Use Air4 ports.................................................................................. -1 4.2 Waste Management Facilities.................................................................................... 4 2 4.3 Other Land -Use Practice Changes. 4-3 4.4 Coordination to Prevent Creation of New Off -Airport Hazardous Wildlife Attractants................................................................................................................... 44 4.5 Coordination on Existing Off -Airport Hazardous Wildlife Attractants. .............. 4-5 4.6 Prompt Remedial Action............................................................................................ 4-5 4.7 FAA Assistance. 4-5 Appendix A. Definitions of Terms Used in this Advisory Circular ........................ A-1 Appendix B. Additional Resources.......................................................................... B-1 u 2/21 /2020 Page Intentionally Blank Vl AC 1 S 0/5200-3 3 C 2/Z I /2020 1.1 Introduction. AC 150/5200-33C Airport operators should maintain an appropriate environment for the safe and efficient operation of aircraft, which entails mitigating wildlife strike hazards by fencing, modifying the landscape in order to deter wildlife or by hazing or removing wildlife hazardous to aircraft from congregating on airports. When considering proposed land uses, operators and sponsors of airports certificated under Part 139, local planners, and developers must take into account whether the proposed land uses, including new development projects, will increase wildlife hazards. Land -use practices that attract or sustain hazardous wildlife populations on or near airports, specifically those listed in Chapter 2, can significantly increase the potential for wildlife strikes. 1.1.2 The FAA urges regulatory agencies and planning and zoning agencies to evaluate proposed new land uses within the separation criteria and prevent the creation of land uses that attract or sustain hazardous wildlife within the separation distances. 1.1.3 The FAA recommends the use of minimum separation criteria outlined below for land -use practices that attract hazardous wildlife to the vicinity of airports. Please note that FAA criteria include land uses that cause movement of hazardous wildlife onto, into, or across the airport's approach or departure airspace or aircraft operations area. (See the discussion of the synergistic effects of surrounding land uses in Paragraph 2.8 of this AC.). For the purpose of evaluating distance criteria, the delineation of the aircraft operations area may also consider future airport development plans depicted on the Airport Layout Plan (e.g., planned runway extension). The separation distances are based on (1) flight patterns and performance criteria of piston -powered aircraft and turbine -powered aircraft, (2) the altitude at which most strikes happen (78 percent occur under 1,000 feet and 90 percent occur under 3,000 feet above ground level), and (3) National Transportation Safety Board recommendations. 1.2 Airports Serving Piston -Powered Aircraft. Airports that do not sell Jet -A fuel normally serve piston -powered aircraft. Notwithstanding more stringent requirements for specific land uses, the FAA recommends a separation distance of 5,000 feet from these airports for any of the hazardous wildlife attractants discussed in Chapter 2 or for new airport development projects meant to accommodate aircraft movement. This distance is to be maintained between the closest point of the airport's aircraft operations area and the hazardous wildlife attractant. Figure 1 depicts an example of the 5,000400t separation distance measured from the nearest aircraft operations area. 1-1 2/21/2020 1.3 1.4 AC I U/5200-33C Airports Serving Turbine -Powered Aircraft. For airports serving turbine -powered aircraft, the FAA recommends a separation distance of 10,000 feet from these airports for any of the hazardous wildlife attractants discussed in Chapter 2 or for new airport development projects meant to accommodate aircraft movement. This distance is to be maintained between the closest point of the airport's aircraft operations area and the hazardous wildlife attractant. Figure 1 depicts an example of the 10,000-foot separation distance from the nearest aircraft movement areas. Protection of Approach, Departure, and Circling Airspace. For all airports, the FAA recommends a distance of 5 miles between the closest point of the airport's aircraft operations area and the hazardous wildlife attractant. Special attention should be given to hazardous wildlife attractants that could cause hazardous wildlife movement into or across the approach or departure airspace. Figure 1 depicts an example of the 5-mile separation distance measured from the nearest aircraft operations area. 1-2 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C Figure 1. Example of recommended separation distances described in Chapter 1 within which hazardous wildlife attractants should be avoided, eliminated, or mitigated. + + 41 + + + + + + + : -� J• w W V• W W J J V 4 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J 4 V W W W W W W W W W V V Y Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J V Y W W W V W W W + W W •V W W W� �•�' W W J �J V V W W W W W W W W W W W rW V V l• Y W W W W `Y W r' rr 1 4 W W + W f �� '�W W W W W W +'d .y W W W 4 ` J 4 Y W W W W W W V• V V 4 V 4 W ,.r V• W V• V• W ..�'' W W W W •V •V W J J `4 Y W '` •Y W W V• W W W %I l • 4 W I W W W� .-rV 1� W W W W W J 4 � W W �W W W W W W W W W W� W w i W � W W w W W W� W W v~'• � w v v Y v + + + + I + ,. + + .� + + +` + + + + + 4 V W I W W W W TSxOt�i'f W W W W I W W W + + + I+ + + Y V W I W W I W W W IW W I W W W + + I + �i• + + + 10 i• + •i�t + Y V W ( W W I W W W W W I W W W • W W WI W tY W Air W W I V V I 4 4 W Y 4 4 Y V Y W V' W \`1 t W W P ERIME?E R A W W W � �W W it W J W V' I V J I 4 'V • V W W \ 1 W W �V• V• V' � W I W W W •V + + + ```+ + `+ + + + + +o + + i ` + + + + + + + + + 4 + +• I• + + + + + •II + + + 4 Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J Y Y W J J J 4 Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J .1 4* 4 W V V V y W W W W W W W 4 V W W W W W W W •Y i- W W W i .Y -`� -^"{'� -•"O �- 4 M W W W W W W L� •V W W- �• -�- Z' - �r -� - 3- � 1 Y V W r W � V• W W W W W W W W + + + + y J Y Y + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + J J Y + W W V• W W W W W '�• W W ,+' iERIME I GR. L 11 V V W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W V V V Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J V O k W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J V y 6 W W W W W W W W W W W W W 'NI W W W W W W y W W v v v v W w yr PERIMETER A: For airports serving piston -powered aircraft, it is recommended hazardous wildlife attractants be 5,000 feet from the nearest aircraft operations area. PERIMETER B: For airports serving turbine -powered aircraft, it is recommended hazardous wildlife attractants be 10,000 feet from the nearest aircraft operations area. PERIMETER C : Recommended for all airports, 5-mile range to protect approac circling airspace. 1-3 h, d eparture and 2/21 /2020 Page Intentionally Blank 1-4 AC 150/5200-33C 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C CHAPTER Z. LAND -USE PRACTICES ON OR NEAR AIRPORTS THAT POTENTIALLY ATTRACT HAZARDOUS WILDLIFE 2.1 General. 2.1.1 Many types of vegetation, habitats and land use practices can provide an attractant to animals that pose a risk to aviation safety. Hazardous wildlife use the natural or artificial habitats on or near an airport for food, water or cover. The wildlife species and the size of the populations attracted to the airport environment vary considerably, depending on several factors, including land -use practices on or near the airport. In addition to the specific considerations outlined below, airport operators should refer to Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports manual, prepared by FAA and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) staff. (This manual is available in English, Spanish, and French). This manual, as well as other helpful resources can be viewed and downloaded free of charge from the Wildlife Strike Resources section of the FAA's wildlife hazard mitigation web site: ttp,//www.FAA.gov/a*rports/allport safety/wildlife). 2.1.1.1 The USDA /Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) / Wildlife Services developed a new publication series on wildlife damage management and is available online. The Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series highlights wildlife species or groups of wildlife species that cause damage to agriculture, property and natural resources, and/or ipact aviation and human health and safety. he publicati mTons can be found at: httas://www.aphis.usda.Yov/aphis/ourfocus/wildlifedamage/sa reports/ct wildlife+damage+management+technical+series. Additional resources have been provided by the USDA /APHIS /Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC) at: h s://v�►Twvv.aahis.usda.�ov/aphis/ourfocus/wildlifedama�e/pro c/sa publications/ct research atewa .The NWRC Research Gateway contains research articles, reports, factsheets, technical notes, data and other materials on wildlife hazard mitigation, risk reduction, animal ecology, habitats, and advanced technologies and methodologies. 2.1.2 This section discusses land -use practices having the potential to attract hazardous wildlife and threaten aviation safety. The FAA has determined that the land uses listed below are generally not compatible with safe airport operations when they are located within the separation distances provided in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. As a reminder, these types of land uses or facilities often require permits from the appropriate permitting agency. The FAA may work with the permitting agency to include conditions for monitoring and mitigation measures, if necessary. Ultimately, the permtttee is responsible for compliance to these conditions and the permitting agency is responsible for tracking compliance. 2-1 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C 2.2 Waste Disposal Operations. Municipal solid waste landfills (municipal landfills) are known to attract large numbers of hazardous wildlife, particularly birds. Because of this, these operations, when located within the separations identified in the siting criteria in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4, are considered incompatible with safe airport operations. 2.2.1 Sitin 2.2.1.1 for New Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Subject to AIR 21. Section 503 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21 st Century (P. L. 106-181) (AIR 21), 49 U.S.C. § 44718(d), prohibits the construction or establishment of a new municipal landfill within 6 miles of certain public -use airports. Before these prohibitions apply, both the airport and the landfill must meet the very specific conditions described below. These restrictions do not apply to airports or landfills located within the state of Alaska. 2.2.1.2 The airport must (1) have received a Federal grants) under 49 U.S.C. § 47101, et. seq.; (2) be under control of a public agency; (3) serve some scheduled air carrier operations conducted in aircraft with less than 60 seats; and (4) have total annual enplanements consisting of at least 51 percent of scheduled air carrier enplanements conducted in aircraft with less than 60 passenger seats. 2.2.1.3 The proposed municipal landfill must (1) be within 6 miles of the airport, as measured from airport property line to the landfill property line, and (2) have started construction or establishment on or after April 5, 2001. Section 44718(d) only limits the construction or establishment of some new landfills. It does not limit the expansion, either vertical or horizontal, of existing landfills. 22.1.4 Regarding existing municipal landfills and lateral expansions of landfills, 40 CFR § 258.10 requires owners or operators of a landfill units located 2.2.2 Sitin within the separation distances provided in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 to demonstrate that the unit is designed and operated so that it does not pose a bird hazard to aircraft. To accomplish this, follow the instructions provided in Paragraphs 3.2 and 3.3, document the wildlife monitoring and mitigation procedures that are cooperatively developed, and place this d©cumentation in the operating permit of the facility. f(lr NPw Mlln1C'111A] Landfills Not Subiect to AIR 21. If an airport and a municipal landfill do not meet the criteria of § 44718(d), then FAA recommends against locating the landfill within the separation distances identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. In determining this distance separation, measurements should be made from the closest point of the airport property boundary to the closest point of the landfill property boundary. 2-2 2/21/2020 AC 1 )U/5200-33C Considerations for Existing Waste Disposal Facilities Within the Limits of Separation Crlterla* The FAA recommends against airport development prof ects that Would increase the number of aircraft operations or accommodate larger or faster aircraft near landfill operations located within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. In addition, in accordance with 40 CFR § 25 8.10, owners or operators of existing landfill units that are located within the separations listed in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 must demonstrate that the unit is designed and operated so it does not pose a bird hazard to aircraft. (See Paragraph 4.3.2 of this AC for a discussion of this demonstration requirement.) 2.2.4 Enclosed Trash Transfer Stations. Enclosed waste -handling facilities that receive garbage behind closed doors; process it via compaction, incineration, or similar manner; and remove all residue by enclosed vehicles generally are compatible with safe airport operations, provided they are constructed and operated properly and are not located on airport property or within the Runway Protection Zone. These facilities should not handle or store putrescible waste outside or in a partially enclosed structure accessible to hazardous wildlife. Trash transfer facilities that are open on one or more sides; or store uncovered quantities of municipal solid waste outside even if only for a short time; or use semi -trailers that leak or have trash clinging to the outside; or do not control odors by ventilation and filtration systems (odor masking is not acceptable) do not meet the FAA's definition of fully enclosed trash transfer stations. The FAA considers fully enclosed waste -handling facilities constructed or operated incorrectly incompatible with safe airport operations if they are located closer than the separation distances specified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. 2.2.5 Composting O Lions on or near Airport Property_. Composting operations that accept only yard waste (e.g., leaves, lawn clippings, or branches) generally do not attract hazardous wildlife. Sewage sludge, Woodchips, and similar material are not municipal solid wastes and may be used as compost bulking agents. The compost, however, must never include food or other municipal solid waste. Composting operations should not be located on airport property unless effective, risk - reducing mitigations are in place. Off -airport property composting operations should be located no closer than the greater of the following distances: 1,200 feet from any aircraft operations area or the distance called for by airport design requirements (see AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design). This spacing should prevent material, personnel, or equipment from penetrating any Object Free Area, Obstacle Free Zone, Threshold Siting Surface, or Clearway. Airport operators should monitor composting operations located in proximity to the airport to ensure that steam or thermal rise does not adversely affect air traffic. Underwater Waste Discharges. The FAA recommends against the underwater discharge of any food waste (e.g., fish processing offal) within the separations identified in Paragraphs 12 through 1.4 because it could attract scavenging hazardous wildlife. 2-3 2/21/2020 AC 150/5Zuu- C RecUling Centers. Recycling centers that accept previously sorted non-food items, such as glass, newspaper, cardboard, aluminum, electronic, and household wastes such as paint, batteries, and oil, are, in most cases, not attractive to hazardous wildlife and are acceptable. Construction and Demolition Debris Facilities. 2.2.8.1 Construction. and demolition landfills generally do not attract hazardous wildlife and are acceptable if maintained in an orderly manner, admit no putrescible waste, and are not co -located with other waste disposal operations. However, construction and demolition landfills have similar visual and operational characteristics to putrescible waste disposal sites. When co -located with putrescible waste disposal operations, construction and demolition landfills are more likely to attract hazardous wildlife because of the similarities between these disposal facilities. 2.2.8.2 Therefore, a construction and demolition landfill co -located with another waste disposal operation should be located outside of the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. Airport operators should be aware that on -site storage of construction and maintenance debris, as well as out -of -service aircraft or aircraft components, may provide an attractant for hazardous species (e.g., nesting or perching locations). The FAA recommends these on -site areas be monitored and/or mitigated, if necessary. Fly Ash Disposal. 2.2.9.1 The incinerated residue from resource recovery power/heat-generating facilities that are fired by municipal solid waste, coal, or wood is generally not a wildlife attractant because it no longer contains putrescible matter. Landfills accepting only fly ash are generally not considered to be wildlife attractants and are acceptable as long as they admit no putrescible waste of any kind, and are not co -located with other disposal operations that attract hazardous wildlife. Since varying degrees of waste consumption are associated with general incineration (not resource recovery power/heat-generating facilities), the FAA considers the ash from general incinerators a regular waste disposal by-product and, therefore, a hazardous wildlife attractant if disposed of within the separation criteria outlined in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. 'Water Management Facilities. Drinking water intake and. treatment facilities, storm water and wastewater treatment facilities, associated retention and settling ponds, ponds built for recreational use, ponds 24 2/21 /2020 AC 10O200-3 3 C and fountains for ornamental purposes, and ponds that result from mining activities often attract large numbers of potentially hazardous wildlife. Development of new open water facilities within the separation criteria identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 should be avoided to prevent wildlife attractants. If necessary, land -use developers and airport operators may need to develop management plans, in compliance with local and state regulations, to support the operation of storm water management facilities on or near all public -use airports to ensure a safe airport environment. The FAA recommends these plans be developed in consultation with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist3, to minimize hazardous wildlife attractants. 2.3.1 Existin Stormwater Management Facilities. 2.3.1.1 On -airport stormwater management facilities allow the quick removal of surface water, including discharges related to aircraft deicing, from impervious surfaces, such as pavement and terminal/hangar building roofs. Existing on -airport detention ponds collect stormwater, protect water quality, and control runoff. Because they slowly release water after storms, they may create standing bodies of water that can attract hazardous wildlife. Where the airport has developed a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, Part 139 regulations require the immediate correction of any wildlife hazards arising from existing stormwater facilities located on or near airports using appropriate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques. Airport operators should develop measures to minimize hazardous wildlife attraction in consultation with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist. 2.3.1.2 Where possible, airport operators should modify stormwater detention ponds to allow a maximum 48-hour detention period for the design storm. The combination of open water and vegetation is particularly attractive to waterfowl and other hazardous wildlife. Water management facilities holding water longer than 48 hours should be maintained in a manner that keeps them free of both emergent and submergent vegetation. The FAA recommends that airport operators avoid or remove retention ponds and detention ponds featuring dead storage to eliminate standing water. Detention basins should remain totally dry between rainfalls. Where constant flow of water is anticipated through the basin, or where any portion of the basin bottom may remain wet, the detention facility should include a concrete or paved pad and/or ditch/swale in the bottom to prevent vegetation that may provide nesting habitat. Drainage basins with a concrete or paved pad should be maintained to prevent or remove any sediment build-up to prevent vegetation growth. When it is not possible to drain a large detention pond. completely, airport operators may use physical barriers, such as bird balls, Wire grids, pillows, 3 See Advisory Circular 150/5200-36, Qualifzcations for Wildlife Biologist Conducting Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Training Curriculums for Airport Personnel Involved in Controlling Wildlife Hazards on Airports. 2-5 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200- 33C or netting, to deter birds and other hazardous wildlife. When physical barriers are proposed, airport operators must evaluate their use, effectiveness and maintenance requirements. Airport operators must also ensure physical barriers will not adversely affect water rescue. Before installing any physical barriers over detention ponds on Part 139 airports, airport operators must get approval from the appropriate FAA Regional Airports Division Office. 2.3.1.4 The FAA recommends that airport operators encourage off -airport stormwater treatment facility operators to incorporate appropriate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques into stormwater treatment facility operating practices when their facility is located within the separation criteria specified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. 2.3.2 New Stormwater Management Facilities. The FAA recommends that storm water management systems located within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 be designed and operated so as not to create above -ground standing water. Stormwater detention ponds should be designed, engineered, constructed, and maintained for a maximum 48—hour detention period after the design storm and to remain completely dry between storms. To facilitate the control of hazardous wildlife, the FAA recommends the use of steep - sided, rip -rap or concrete lined, narrow, linear -shaped water detention basins. When it is not possible to place these ponds away from an airport's aircraft operations area (but still on airport property), airport operators may use physical barriers, such as bird balls, wire grids, floating covers, vegetation barriers (bottom liners), or netting, to prevent access of hazardous wildlife to open water and minimize aircraft -wildlife interactions. Caution is advised when nets or wire grids are used for deterring birds from attractants. Mesh size should be < 5 cm (2") to avoid entangling and killing birds and should not be made of a monofilament material. Grids installed above and across water to deter hazardous birds (e.g., waterfowl, cormorants, etc.) are different than using a small mesh covering but also provides an effective deterrent. Grid material, size, pattern and height above water may differ on a case -by -case basis. When physical barriers are used, airport operators must evaluate their use and ensure they will not adversely affect water rescue. Before installing any physical barriers over detention ponds on Part 139 airports, a review by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist should be conducted, prior to approval from the appropriate FAA Regional Airports Division Office. All vegetation in or around detention basins that provide food or cover for hazardous wildlife should be eliminated. If soil conditions and other requirements allow, the FAA encourages the use of underground storm water infiltration systems because they are less attractive to wildlife. 2.3.3 Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities. 203 03 01 The FAA recommends that airport operators immediately correct any wildlife hazards arising from existing wastewater treatment facilities located on or near the airport. 2-6 2/21 /2020 AC 150/5200-33 C 2.3.3.2 Where required, a wildlife management plan will outline appropriate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques. Accordingly, airport operators should encourage wastewater treatment facility operators to incorporate measures, developed in consultation with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist, to minimize hazardous wildlife attractants. Airport operators should also encourage those wastewater treatment facility operators to incorporate these mitigation techniques into their standard operating practices. In addition, airport operators should consider the existence of wastewater treatment facilities when evaluating proposed sites for new airport development projects and avoid such sites when practicable. 2.3.4 New Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The FAA recommends against the construction. of new wastewater treatment facilities or associated settling ponds within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. Appendix 1 defines wastewater treatment facility as "any devices and/or systems used to store, treat, recycle, or reclaim municipal sewage or liquid industrial wastes." The definition includes any pretreatment involving the reduction or elimination of pollutants prior to introducing such pollutants into a treatment facility. When a wastewater treatment facility is proposed within the separation criteria, the airport operator, project proponent, and local jurisdiction should discuss the proposed prof ect location with regard to its location near the airport and the separation distances identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. If possible, a more suitable location for the proposed facility should be identified. If no other suitable location exists, FAA recommends that the proposed facility plans be reviewed by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist to identify measures to avoid or reduce the facility's potential to attract hazardous wildlife. If appropriate measures cannot be incorporated to reduce potential wildlife hazards, airport operators should document their opposition in a letter to the local jurisdiction. Artificial Marshes. In warmer climates, wastewater treatment facilities sometimes employ artificial marshes and. use submergent and emergent aquatic vegetation as natural filters. These artificial marshes may be used by some species of flocking birds, such as blackbirds and waterfowl, for breeding or roosting activities. The FAA recommends against establishing artificial marshes within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. 2.3.6 Wastewater Discharge and Sludge Disposal. The FAA recommends careful consideration regarding the discharge of wastewater or biosolids (i.e., secondarily treated sewage sludge) on airport property. Such discharges might improve soil moisture and quality on unpaved areas and lead to improved turf growth. Depending on the airfield plant communities and habitats present, this can be an attractive food source for many species of animals or, conversely, could result in limited attractiveness to hazardous wildlife. Also, improved turf requires more frequent mowing and could attract geese. Airports should improve their turf with the goal of a monoculture of turf that is least attractive to wildlife. Wastewater or biosolids 2-7 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C applications might assist in achieving this goal. Caution should be exercised when discharges saturate airfield areas adjacent to paved surfaces. The resultant soft, muddy conditions could restrict or prevent emergency vehicles from reaching accident sites in a timely manner. 2.4 Wetlands. Wetlands provide a variety of functions and can be regulated by local, state, and Federal laws. Wetlands can. be attractive to many types of wildlife, including many which rank high on the list of hazardous wildlife species (Table 1 - AC 150/5200-32). Some types of wetlands are not as attractive to wildlife as others and they should be viewed on a case -by -case basis to determi rene the likelihood of proposed wetlands increasing :)cation, the numbers of hazardous wildlife at the airport. Factors such as size, shape, lcanopy cover and vegetative composition among other things should be considered when determining compatibility. Note: If questions exist as to whether an area qualifies as a wetland, contact the District Office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or a wetland consultant qualified to delineate wetlands. 2.4.1 Existin Wetlands on or near Airport Property. If wetlands are located on or near airport property, airport operators should. be alert to any wildlife use or habitat changes in these areas that could affect safe aircraft operations. At public -use airports, the FAA recommends immediately correcting, in cooperation with local, state, and Federal regulatory agencies, any wildlife hazards arising from existing wetlands located on or near airports within 5 miles of the aircraft operations area. Where required, a wildlife management plan will outline appropriate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques. Accordingly, airport operators should develop measures to minimize hazardous wildlife attraction in consultation with a FAA Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist. New A ort Development. Whenever possible, the FAA recommends locating new airports using the separations from wetlands identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. Where alternative sites are not practicable, or when airport operators are expanding an existing airport into or near wetlands, a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist, in coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the state wildlife management agency should evaluate the wildlife hazards and prepare a wildlife management plan that indicates methods of minimizing the hazards. 2.4.3 Mitigation for Wetland Impacts from Airport Projects. Wetland mitigation may be necessary when unavoidable wetland disturbances result from. new airport development projects or projects required to correct wildlife hazards from wetlands. Wetland mitigation must be designed so it does not create a wildlife hazard. The FAA recommends that wetland mitigation projects that may attract hazardous wildlife be sited outside of the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. 2-8 2/21 /2020 AC 150/:)Zuu 33C 2.4.3.1 onsite Mitigation of Wetland Functions. Wetland mitigation/conservation easements must not inhibit the airport operator's ability to effectively control hazardous wildlife on or near the mitigation site or effectively maintain other aspects of safe airport operations. Enhancing such mitigation areas to attract hazardous wI dlifink must be avoided. The FAA will review any onsite mitigation proposals to determine compatibility with safe airport operations and grant assurance compliance. Early coordination with the FAA is encouraged for any proposal to use airport land for wetland mitigation. A Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist should evaluate any wetland mitigation projects that are needed to protect unique wetland functions and that must be located in the separation criteria in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 before the mitigation is implemented. A wildlife management plan should be developed to reduce the wildlife hazards. 2.4.3.2 Offsite Mitigation of Wetland Functions. 2.4.3.2.1 The FAA recommends that wetland mitigation projects that may attract hazardous wildlife be sited outside of the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 unless they provide unique functions that must remain onsite (see 2.4.3.1). Agencies that regulate impacts to or around wetlands recognize that it may be necessary to split wetland functions in mitigation schemes. Therefore, regulatory agencies may, under certain circumstances, allow portions of mitigation to take place in different locations. 2.4.3.2.2 The FAA encourages landowners or communities supporting the restoration or enhancement of wetlands to do so only after critically analyzing how those activities would affect aviation safety. To do so, landowners or communities should contact the affected airport sponsor, FAA, and/or a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist. Those parties should work cooperatively to develop restoration or enhancement plans that would not worsen existing wildlife hazards or create such hazards. See Paragraphs 4.1.1 — 4.1.3 for land -use modifications evaluation criteria. 2.4.3.2.4 If parties develop a mutually acceptable restoration or enhancement plan, the landowner or community proposing the restoration or enhancement must monitor the restored or enhanced site. This monitoring must verify that efforts have not worsened or created hazardous wildlife attraction or activity. If such attraction or activity occurs, the landowner or community should work with the airport sponsor, or a Biologist to reduce the hazard to aviation. 2-9 Qualified Airport Wildlife 2/21/2020 At, 150/5200-33C 2.4.3.3 Mitigation Banking. Wetland mitigation banking is the creation or restoration of wetlands in order to provide mitigation credits that can be used to offset permitted wetland losses. Mitigation banking benefits wetland resources by providing advance replacement for permitted wetland losses; consolidating small projects into larger, better -designed and managed units; and encouraging integration of wetland mitigation projects with watershed planning. This last benefit is most helpful for airport projects, as wetland impacts mitigated outside of the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 can still be located within the same watershed. Wetland mitigation banks meeting the separation. criteria offer an ecologically sound approach to mitigation in these situations. Airport operators should work with local watershed management agencies or oA ganizations to develop mitigation banking for wetland impacts on airport property. 2.5 Dredge Spoil Containment Areas. The FAA recommends against locating dredge spoil containment areas (also known as Confined Disposal Facilities) within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 if the containment area or the spoils contain material that would attract hazardous wildlife. Proposals for new dredge spoil containment areas located within the separation distances should be reviewed on a case -by -case basis to determine the likelihood of resulting in an increase in hazardous wildlife. The FAA recommends that airport sponsors work with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist and/or the FAA to review proposals for dredge spoil containment areas located within separation criteria. 2.6 Agricultural Activities. Many agricultural crops can attract hazardous wildlife and should not be planted within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. Corn, wheat, and other small grains in particular should be avoided. If the airport has no financial alternative to agricultural crops to produce the income necessary to maintain the viability of the airport, then the airport should consider growing crops that hold little food value for hazardous wildlife, such as grass hay. Attractiveness to hazardous wildlife species during all phases of production, from planting through harvest and fallow periods, should be considered when contemplating the use of airport property for agricultural production. Where agriculture is present, crop residue (e.g., waste grain) should not be left in the field following harvest. Also, airports should consult AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design, to ensure that agricultural crops do not create airfield obstructions or other safety hazards. Before planning or initiating any agricultural practices on airport property, operators should get approval from the appropriate FAA regional Airports Division Office and demonstrate that the additional cost of wildlife control and potential accidents is offset by revenue generated by agricultural leases. Annual review of the Airport Certification Manual by the Certification Inspector does not constitute approval and is insufficient to meet this requirement. 2-10 2/21/2020 At. 150/5200-33C 2.6.1 Livestock Production. Confined livestock operations (i.e., feedlots, dairy operations, hog or chicken production facilities, or egg laying operations) often attract flocking birds, such as blackbirds, starlings, or pigeons that pose a hazard to aviation. Therefore, the FAA recommends against such facilities within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. The airport operator should be aware of any wildlife hazards that appear to be attracted to off -site livestock operations and consider working with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist to identify reasonable and feasible measures that may be proposed to landowners to reduce the attractiveness of the site to the potentially hazardous wildlife species. 2.6.1.1 In exceptional circumstances, and following FAA review and approval, livestock may be grazed on airport property as long as they are off the airfield and separated behind fencing where they cannot pose a hazard to aircraft. The livestock should be fed and watered as far away from the airfield and approach/departure space as possible because the feed and water may attract birds. The wildlife management plan should include monitoring and wildlife mitigation for any areas where the livestock and their feed/water is located in case a wildlife hazard is detected. Airports without wildlife management plans should equally consider monitoring and mitigation protocols to identify and address any wildlife hazards associated with livestock and their feeding operations. 2.6.2 Alternative Uses of Agricultural Land. 2.60201 Habitat modification both on and surrounding an airfield is one of the best and most economical long term mitigation strategies to decrease risk that wildlife pose to flight safety. Alternative land uses (e.g., solar and biofuel) at airports could help mitigate many of the challenges for the airport operator, developers, and conservationists. However, careful planning must first determine that proposed alternative energy production at airports does not create wildlife attractants or other hazards. Some airports are surrounded by vast areas of farmed land within the distances specified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. Seasonal uses of agricultural land for activities such as hunting can create a hazardous wildlife situation. In some areas, farmers will rent their land for hunting purposes. Rice farmers, among others, flood their land to attract waterfowl or for conservation efforts. This is often done during waterfowl hunting season to obtain. additional revenue by renting out duck blinds. The waterfowl hunters then use decoys and call in hundreds, if not thousands, of birds, creating a threat to aircraft safety. It is recommended that a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist review, in coordination with local farmers and producers, these types of seasonal land uses and incorporate mitigating measures into the wildlife management plan, when possible. 2-11 2/21 /2020 2.7.1 AC 1 So/520o-33C Aquaculture. Aquaculture is the breeding, rearing, and harvesting of fish, shellfish, and plants in all types of water environments including ponds, rivers, lakes, and the ocean. Aquaculture is used to produce food fish, sport fish, bait fish, ornamental fish, and to support restoration activities. Aquacultured species are grown in a range of facilities including tanks, cages, ponds, and raceways. When an aquaculture facility is proposed within the separation criteria, the airport operator, project proponent, and local jurisdiction should discuss the proposed project location with regard to its attraction to hazardous species, location near the airport and the separation distances identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. If a facility is identified as a possible significant attraction, a more suitable location for the proposed facility should be identified. If no other suitable location exists, it is recommended that the proposed facility plans be reviewed by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist to identify measures to avoid or reduce the facility's potential to attract hazardous wildlife. Freshwater Aquaculture. 2.7.1.1 Freshwater aquaculture activities (e.g., catfish, tilapia, trout or bass production) are typically conducted outside of fully enclosed buildings in constructed ponds or tanks and are inherently attractive to a wide variety of birds and therefore pose a significant risk to airport safety when within the separation distances specified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. Freshwater aquaculture should only be considered if extensive mitigation measures have been incorporated to eliminate attraction to hazardous birds. Examples of such mitigation include: 1. Netting or other material to exclude hazardous birds (e.g., eagles, osprey, gulls, cormorants); 2. Acoustic hazing including pyrotechnics, propane cannons, directional sonic/hailing devices and other similar technologies; 3. Feeding procedure cleanliness, exclusion techniques prohibiting birds from. perching or accessing food; efficiency of feeding operation procedures that reduce fish food attraction to hazardous birds; 4. Operation procedure efficiency transferring live fish. to and from enclosures or removal of dead fish; maintenance and upkeep of facility; 5. Monitoring, mitigation and communication protocols with nearby airports as a proactive safety feature in response to specific hazardous species in the event they are identified at the facility in unacceptable numbers. Marine Aquaculture. Marine aquaculture (Mariculture) refers to the culturing of species that live in the ocean. When appropriately managed and mitigated as necessary, mariculture facilities do not pose a significant risk to airport safety. 2-12 2/21 /2020 Finush Mariculture. AC I U/5zuu- C 2.7.2.1.1 u . S . finfish mariculture primarily produces salmon and steelhead trout as well as lesser amounts of cod, moi, yellowtail, barramundi, seabass, and seabream. Maricultures use rigid and non -rigid enclosures (e.g., cages) at the surface or submerged in the water column. These enclosures may be fully enclosed, or be open at the top or covered with netted material to negate losses from depredation by birds or other predators. Different facilities employ different designs and operational protocols. 2.7.2.1.2 While mariculture operations typically do not pose a significant attractant to hazardous birds, design and operational features can be incorporated as permit conditions to mitigate attraction and effectively reduce this risk. Examples of such mitigation include: 1. Fully enclosed cages using netting or other material to exclude hazardous birds (e.g., gulls, cormorants, pelicans) and to insure retention of fish; 2. Submerged. enclosures to reduce attraction to hazardous birds; 3. Feed barge cleanliness, exclusion techniques prohibiting birds from perching or accessing food; efficiency of feeding operation procedures that reduce fish food attraction to hazardous birds; 4. Operation procedure efficiency transferring live fish to and from enclosures or removal of dead fish; maintenance and upkeep of facility; 5. Monitoring, mitigation and communication protocols with nearby airports as a proactive safety feature in response to specific hazardous species in the event they are identified at the facility in unacceptable numbers. 2.7.2.2 Shellfish Mariculture. U.S. shellfish mariculture primarily produces oysters, clams, mussels, lobster and shrimp. Shellfish may be grown directly on the bottom, in submerged cages or bags, or on suspended lines. These types of mariculture operations do not typically present a significant attractant to hazardous birds. For those operations that are found to pose a significant risk, design and operation features that diminish possible attraction to hazardous bird species (e.g., reducing areas for perching or feeding) can effectively reduce this risk. Plant Mariculture. 2.7.2.3.1 Microalgae, also referred to as phytoplankton, microphytes, or planktonic algae constitute the majority of cultivated algae. Macroalgae, commonly known as seaweed, also have many commercial and industrial uses. 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C 2.7.2.3.2 While few commercial seaweed farms exist, the sector is growing. These types of mariculture operations do not typically present an attractant to hazardous birds. 2.8 Golf Courses, Landscaping, Structures and Other Land -Use Considerations. 2.8.1 Golf Courses. The large grassy areas and open. water found on most golf courses are attractive to hazardous wildlife, particularly Canada geese and some species of gulls. These species can pose a threat to aviation safety. If golf courses are located on or near airport property, airport operators should be alert to any wildlife use or habitat changes in these areas that could affect safe aircraft operations. Accordingly, airport operators should develop, at a minimum, onsite measures to minimize hazardous wildlife attraction in consultation with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist. Existing golf courses located within these separations that have been documented to attract hazardous wildlife are encouraged to develop a program to reduce the attractiveness of the sites to species that are hazardous to aviation safety. The FAA recommends against construction of new golf courses within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 if determined that the new facility would create a significant wildlife hazard attractant by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist. Airport operators should ensure these golf courses are monitored on a continuing basis for the presence of hazardous wildlife. If hazardous wildlife is detected, corrective actions should be immediately implemented. 2.8.2 Landscaping and Landscape Maintenance. 2086201 Depending on its geographic location, landscaping can attract hazardous wildlife. The FAA recommends that airport operators approach landscaping with caution. and. confine it to airport areas not associated with aircraft movements. Vegetation that produces seeds, fruits, or berries, or that provides dense roosting or nesting cover should not be used. Airports should develop a landscape plan to include approved and prohibited plants. The landscape plan should consider the watering needs of mature plants. A Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist should review all landscaping plans. Airport operators should also monitor all landscaped areas on a continuing basis for the presence of hazardous wildlife. If hazardous wildlife is detected, corrective actions should be immediately implemented. Turf grass areas on airporis have the potential. to be highly attractive to a variety of hazardous wildlife species. Research conducted by the USDA Wildlife Services' National Wildlife Research Center has shown that no one airfield vegetation management regimen will deter all species of hazardous wildlife in all situations. The composition and. height of airfield grasslands should be properly managed to reduce their attractiveness to hazardous wildlife. In many situations, an intermediate height, monoculture turf grass might be most favorable. In cooperation with a 2-14 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist, airport operators should develop airport turf grass management plans on a prescription basis, including cultivar selection during reseeding efforts, that is specific to the airport's geographic location, climatic conditions, and the type of hazardous wildlife likely to frequent the airport. Airport operators should ensure that plant varieties attractive to hazardous wildlife are not used on the airport. Disturbed areas or areas in need of re - vegetating should not be planted with seed mixtures containing millet or any other large -seed producing grass. For airport property already planted with seed mixtures containing millet, rye grass, or other large -seed producing grasses, the FAA recommends disking, plowing, or another suitable agricultural practice to prevent plant maturation and seed head production. Plantings should follow the specific recommendations for grass management and seed and plant selection made by the State University Cooperative Extension Service, the local office of Wildlife Services, or a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist. Airport operators should also consider developing and implementing a preferred/prohibited plant species list, reviewed by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist, which has been designed for the geographic location to reduce the attractiveness to hazardous wildlife for landscaping airport property. 2.8.3 Structures. 2.8.3.1 Certain structures attract birds for loafing and nesting. Flat rooftops can be attractive to many species of gulls for nesting, hangars provide roosting / nesting opportunities for rock doves, towers, light posts and navigation aids can provide loafing / hunting perches for raptors and aircraft can provide loafing / nesting sites for European starlings, blackbirds and other species. These structures should be monitored and mitigated, if located on - site. Off -site structural attractions may require additional coordination to effectively mitigate their use by hazardous species. 2.8.3.2 Cellular communications towers are becoming increasingly more attractive to large birds (e.g., osprey, eagles, herons, vultures) for nesting and rearing their young. This problem is a growing concern because once the young fledge from nests built on manmade structures they are more likely to return to these kinds of sites to reproduce in future years. Other Hazardous Wildlife Attractants. Other land uses (e.g., conservation easements, parks, wildlife management areas) or activities not addressed in this AC may have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife. Regardless of the source of the attraction, when hazardous wildlife is noted on a public - use airport, each certificate holder must take prompt remedial action(s) to protect aviation safety and all non -certificated airports should take prompt remedial action(s) to protect aviation safety. 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C 2.9 Habitat for State and Federally Listed Species on Airports. An airport's air operations area is an artificial environment that has been created and maintained for aircraft operations. Because an aircraft operations area can be markedly different from the surrounding native landscapes, it may attract wildlife species that do not normally occur, or that occur only in low numbers in the area. Some of the grassland species attracted to an airport's aircraft operations area are at the edge of their natural ranges, but are attracted to habitat features found in the airport environment. Also, some wildlife species may occur on the airport in higher numbers than occur naturally in the region because the airport offers habitat features the species prefer. Some of these wildlife species are Federal or state -listed threatened and endangered species or have been designated by state resource agencies as species of special concern. 2.9.1 State -Listed Species I�abitat Concerns. 2.9.1.1 Many state wildlife agencies have requested that airport operators facilitate and encourage habitat on airports for state -listed threatened and endangered species or species of special concern. Airport operators should exercise caution in adopting new management techniques because they may increase wildlife hazards and be inconsistent with safe airport operations. Managing the on -airport environment to facilitate or encourage the presence of hazardous wildlife species can create conditions that are incompatible with, or pose a threat to, aviation safety. 2.9.1.2 Not all state -listed threatened and endangered species or species of concern pose a direct threat to aviation safety. However, these species may pose an indirect threat and be hazardous because they attract other wildlife species or support prey species attractive to other species that are directly hazardous. Also, the habitat management practices that benefit these state - listed threatened and endangered species and species of special concern may attract other hazardous wildlife species. On -airport habitat and wildlife management practices designed to benefit wildlife that directly or indirectly create safety hazard where none existed before are incompatible with safe airport operations. Federally Listed Species Habitat Concerns. 20902.1 The FAA supports efforts to protect threatened and endangered species, as a matter of principle and consistent with the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The FAA must balance these requirements with our requirements and mission to maintain a safe and efficient airport system. Requests to enhance or create habitat for threatened and endangered species often conflict with the safety of the traveling public and may place the protected species at risk of mortality by aircraft collisions. The FAA does not support the creation, conservation or enhancement of habitat or refuges to attract endangered species on airports. If endangered species are present on an airport, specific obligations may apply under the Endangered 2-16 2/21 /2020 AC 1, 0/5200-3 3 C Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. and the airport operator should contact the Airports District Office Environmental Protection Specialist. 2.9.2.2 The designation of critical habitat for listed species under the Endangered Species Act on airport lands may be an incompatible land use in conflict with the intended and dedicated purpose of airport lands and may limit or preclude the ability of the airport to develop new infrastructure and growth capacity to meet future air carrier service demand. In addition, depending on the listed species (primarily but not limited to avian species), the designation of critical habitat within the separation distances provided in paragraphs 1.2 - 1.4 can represent a hazardous wildlife attractant in conflict with 14 CFR Part 139.337. 2.10 Synergistic Effects of Surrounding Land Uses. There may be circumstances where two or more different land uses would not, by themselves, be considered hazardous wildlife attractants or are located outside of the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 but collectively may create a wildlife corridor directly through the airport and/or surrounding airspace. An example involves a lake located outside of the separation criteria on the east side of an airport and a large hayfield on the west side of an airport. These two land uses, taken together, could create a flyway for Canada geese directly across the airspace of the airport. Airport operators must consider the entire surrounding landscape and community when developing the wildlife management plan. 2/21 /2020 Page Intentionally Blank AC 150/5200-33C 2/21/2020 AC I U/5200-33C CHAPTER 3. PROCEDURES FOR WILDLIFE HAZARD MANAGEMENT BY OPERATORS OF PUBLIC -USE AIRPORTS AND CONDITIONS FOR NON -CERTIFICATED AIRPORTS TO CONDUCT WILDLIFE HAZARD ASSESSMENTS AND WILDLIFE HAZARD SITE VISITS 3.1 Introduction. In recognition of the increased risk of serious aircraft damage or the loss of human life that can result from a wildlife strike, the FAA recommends all airports conduct a Wildlife Hazard Site Visit or Wildlife Hazard Assessment unless otherwise mandated after an initial triggering events defined in Part 139 Section 139.337. After the airport has completed the site visit or assessment and implemented a wildlife management pIan, investigations should be conducted following subsequent triggering events to determine if the original assessment and plan adequately address the situation or if conditions have changed that would warrant an update to the plan. In this section, airports that are certificated under 14 C.F.R. § 139.337 are referred to as "certificated airports" and all others are referred to as "non -certificated airports." When a statement refers to both certificated and non -certificated airports, "airport" or "all airports" is used. 3.2 Coordination with Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologists. Hazardous wildlife management is a complex discipline and conditions vary widely across the United States. Therefore, only airport wildlife biologists meeting the qualification requirements in Advisory Circular 150/5200-36, Qualifications for Wildlife Biologist Conducting Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Training Curriculums for Airport Personnel Involved in Controlling Wildlife Hazards on Airports, can conduct Site Visits and Assessments. Airports must maintain documentation that the Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist meets the qualification requirements in Advisory Circular 150/5200-36. 3.3 Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports: A Manual For Airport Personnel. 3.3.1 The Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports manual, prepared by FAA and USDA Wildlife Services staff, contains a compilation of information to assist airport personnel in the development, implementation, and evaluation of wildlife management plans at airports. The manual includes specific information on the nature of wildlife strikes, legal authority, regulations, wildlife management techniques, Assessments, Plans, and sources of help and information. The manual is available in three languages: English, Spanish, and French. It can be viewed and downloaded free of charge from the FAA's wildlife hazard mitigation web site: htti)s://www.faa.gov/al!ports/ai!port safety/wildlife. This manual only provides a starting point for addressing wildlife hazard issues at airports. FAA recommends that airports consult with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologists to assist with development of a wildlife management plan and the implementation of management actions by airport personnel. 3-1 2/Z 1 /2020 AC 150/5200-33C 3.3.2 There are many other resources complementary to this manual for use in developing and implementing wildlife management plans. Several are listed in the manual's bibliography or on the FAA Wildlife Mitigation website: https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport safety/wildlife 3.4 Wildlife Hazard Site Visits and Wildlife Hazard Assessments. 3.4.1 Operators of certificated airports are encouraged to conduct an initial assessment regardless of whether the airport has experienced one of the triggering events. Doing so would allow the airport to take proactive action and mitigate the wildlife risk before experiencing an incident. All other airports are encouraged to conduct an assessment or site visit (as defined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-38) conducted by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist (as defined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-36). Part 139 certificated airports are currently required to ensure that an assessment is conducted consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 139.337. 3.4.2 The intent of a site visit is to provide an abbreviated analysis of an airport's wildlife hazards and to provide timely information that allows the airport to expedite the mitigation of these hazards. The FAA also recommends that airports conduct an assessment or site visit as soon as practicable in order to identify any immediate wI ldlife hazards and/or mitigation measures. 3.4.3 Non -certificated airports should submit the results of the site visit or assessment to the FAA for review. The FAA will review the submitted site visit or assessment and make a recommendation regarding the development of a wildlife management plan. A wildlife management plan can be developed based on a site visit and will be required if the non -certificated airport is going to request federal grants for the purpose of mitigating wildlife hazards. 3.5 Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. 3.5.1 The FAA will consider the results of the assessment, along with the aeronautical activity at the airport and the views of the airport operator and airport users, in determining whether a wildlife management plan is needed for certificated airports, or recommended for non -certificated airports. If the FAA determines that a wildlife management plan is needed for a certificated airport, the airport operator must formulate a plan, using the assessment as its basis and submit to the FAA for approval. If the FAA recommends that anon- certificated airport develop a plan, either an assessment or a site visit can be used as the basis for the wildlife management plan. Airports should consult AC 150/5200-38, Protocol for the Conduct and Review of Wildlife Hazard Site Visits, Wildlife Hazard Assessments, and Wildlife Hazard Management Plans, for further information on preparation and implementation requirements for their wildlife management plan. 3 -2 2/21 /2020 AC 150/5200-33C 3.5.3 The goal of an airport's wildlife management plan is to minimize the risk to aviation safety, airport structures or equipment, or human health posed by populations of hazardous wildlife on and around the airport. For wildlife management plans to effectively reduce wildlife hazards on and near airports, accurate and consistent wildlife strike reporting is essential. Airports should consult AC 150/5200-32, Reporting Wildlife Ai�c�aft Strikes, for further information on responsibilities and recommendations concerning wildlife strikes. 3.5.4 The wildlife management plan. must identify hazardous wildlife attractants on or near the airport and the appropriate wildlife management techniques to minimize the wildlife hazard. It must also prioritize the management measures. 3.6 Local Coordination. The FAA recommends establishing a Wildlife Hazards Working Group to facilitate the communication, cooperation, and coordination of the airport and its surrounding community necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the wildlife management plan. The cooperation of the airport community is essential to prevent incompatible development in the airport vicinity. Whether on or off the airport, input from all involved parties must be considered when a potentially hazardous wildlife attractant is being proposed. Based on available resources, airport operators should undertake public education activities with the local planning agencies because some activities in the vicinity of an airport, while harmless under normal conditions, can attract wildlife and present a danger to aircraft (see Paragraphs 4.5 to 4.8). For example, if public trails are planned near wetlands or in parks adjoining airport property, the public should know that feeding birds and other wildlife in the area may pose a risk to aircraft. 3.7 Operational Notifications of Wildlife Hazards. 3.7.1 Operational notifications include active correspondence addressing wildlife issues on or near an airport, notifications and alerts. If an existing land -use practice creates a wildlife hazard and the land -use practice or wildlife hazard cannot be immediately eliminated, airport operators must issue a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) and. encourage the land owner or manager to take steps to control the wildlife hazard and minimize further attraction.. Permanent attractions that cannot be eliminated or mitigated may be noted in the Airport/Facility Directory. NOTAMS and Airport/Facility Directory notifications are not appropriate for short-term or immediate advisories that can be relayed via Pilot Reports, direct air traffic control. voice communications, or temporary Automated Terminal Advisory System alerts. Care should be given to avoid the continual broadcast of general warnings for extended periods of time. General warnings such as "birds in the vicinity of the aerodrome" offer little timely information to aid pilots and eventually may be ignored if not updated. 3.7.2 The Automated Terminal Advisory System (ATIS) is a continuous broadcast of recorded aeronautical information for aerodromes and their immediate surroundings. ATIS broadcasts contain essential information, such as current weather information, 3-3 2/21/2020 AC I U/5200-33C active runways, available approaches, wildlife hazards and any other information required by the pilots. They indicate significant (moderate or severe) wildlife activity, as reported by an approved agency that presents temporary hazards on the ATIS broadcast. Pilots take notice of available ATIS broadcasts before contacting the local control unit, which reduces the controllers' workload and relieves frequency congestion. The recording is updated in fixed intervals or when there is a significant change in the information. Although ATIS broadcasts involving wildlife should be timely and specific, pilots do not need to know species -specific information. General descriptive information detailing size and number of animals, locations and timing of occurrence provides useful, actionable information for pilots. 3.7.3 A pilot report (PIREP) is reported by a pilot to indicate encounters of hazardous weather (e.g., icing or turbulence) and hazardous wildlife. Pilot reports are short-lived warnings providing immediate information on pilot observations that are transmitted in real-time to air traffic control. Large animals near active surfaces, soaring vultures and raptors within approach/ departure corridors and waterfowl such as geese feeding in grassy areas next to runways are all examples of pilot reports generated by pilots. 3.8 Federal. and State Depredation Permits. The FAA recommends that airports maintain federal and state depredation permits to allow mitigation and/ or removal of hazardous species. All protected species require special permits for lethal mitigation or capture and relocation procedures. Similarly, endangered or threatened species mitigation also requires special permits. The FAA recommends that airports work closely with a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist during the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service consultation and permitting process. The following Orders can help airports reduce risks from hazardous species by allowing private citizens to control hazardous species off airport properties without the need for a Federal depredation permit. Standing D predation Orders. 3.8.1.1 Federal law allows people to protect themselves and their property from damage caused by migratory birds. Provided no effort is made to kill or capture the birds, a depredation permit is not required to merely scare or herd depredating migratory birds other than endangered or threatened species or bald or golden eagles (50 CFR 21.41). 3.8.1.2 In addition, certain species of migratory birds may be mitigated without a federal permit under specific circumstances, many of which relate to agricultural situations. The following Standing Depredation Orders have applicability near airports: • 50 CFR § 21.49- Control Order for Resident Canada Geese at Airports anA Military Airfields. • 50 CFR § 21.50- Depredation Order for Resident Canada Geese Nests and Eggs. 34 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C 50 CFR § 21.4J - Depredation Order for Blackbirds, Cowbirds, Crows, Grackles, and Magpies. 50 CFR § 21.54 - Control Order for Muscovy Ducks in the United States. • 50 CFR § 21.55 -Control Order for Invasive Migratory Birds in Hawaii. 3-5 2/21/2020 Page Intentionally Blank 3-6 AC 150/520o-33C 2/21/2020 AC I U/5zuu- C - - . -UL • 1ago 1 4.1 FAA Notification and Review of Proposed Land -Use Practice Changes in the Vicinity of Public -Use Airports. For projects that are located within 5 miles of the airport's aircraft operations area, the FAA may review development plans, proposed land -use changes, operational changes, major federal actions or wetland mitigation plans to determine if such changes increase risk to airport safety by attracting hazardous wildlife on and around airports. The FAA is not a permitting agency for land use modifications that occur off airport properties, therefore, such reviews are typically initiated by state or federal permitting agencies seeking FAA input on new or revised permits. Each of the land uses listed in Chapter 2 of this AC has the potential to pose a risk to airport operations when they are located within the separation distances provided in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. 4.1.2 Off -site land use modifications near airports may include an assessment of risk. for facilities and land -use changes and, if necessary, mitigation strategies that may reduce rA to an acceptable level. However, the FAA recognizes that individual facilities or land -use modifications may present a range of attractants to different species, resulting in varying levels of risk. Therefore, the FAA considers each proposal on a case -by -case basis. 4.1.3 The FAA analyzes each land -use modification or new facility proposal prior to its establishment or any significant planned. changes to design or operations that may increase the risk level. As part of a review, the FAA considers several factors that include, but are not limited to: l . Type of attractant; 2 . Size of attractant; 3. Location/distance of attractant from airport; 4. Design (e.g., construction, material, mitigation techniques employed into design); 5. Operation (e.g., cleanliness, constancy/ volume of use, seasonality, time of day); 6. Monitoring protocols (e.g., frequency, documentation, evaluation, species identification and number thresholds that trigger actions of communication or mitigation, baseline wildlife data); 7. Mitigation protocols (e.g., responsibilities, methods, intensity, pre -determined objectives, documentation, evaluation); and. 8. Communication protocols to airport and/ or air traffic control tower; The review of these factors may result in FAA recommended additions or modifications to a conditional use permit that allows the permitting agency to track compliance with the permtttee obligations. Such conditions placed within a permit 4-1 2/21 /2020 AC I D u/5200-3 3 C may involve a comprehensive outline and recognition of Individuals responsible for monitoring, communication, and mitigation measures if certain action thresholds are met. Action thresholds are defined in this instance as those pre -determined parameters (e.g., number, location, behavior, time of day) of specific hazardous species that would trigger a mitigation response. Additionally, baseline data should be used to determine the effect, if any, on wildlife populations at the proposed off -site location and/or at the airport. 4.1.5 Baseline data may need to be collected, depending on the existence of useful data and timeline for site modification. If, after taking into account the factors above, FAA determines that a facility poses a significant risk to airport safety, FAA will object to its establishment or renewal. 4.1.6 For projects that are located within 5 miles of the airport's aircraft operations area, the FAA Airport District Office may review development plans, proposed land -use changes, operational changes, major federal actions or wetland mitigation plans to determine if such changes present potential wildlife hazards to aircraft operations. The FAA considers sensitive airport areas as those that lie under or next to approach or departure airspace. This brief examination should indicate if further investigation is warranted. 4.1.7 Where a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist has conducted a further study to evaluate a site's compatibility with airport operations, the FAA may use the study results to make a determination. 4.2 Waste Management Facilities. 4.2.1 Notification of New/Expanded Project Proposal. 40201.1 49 U.S.C. § 44718(d), prohibits the construction or establishment of new municipal landfills within 6 miles of certain public -use airports, when both the airport and the landfill meet specific conditions. See Paragraph 2.2 of this guidance for a more detailed discussion of these restrictions. 4.2.1.2 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires any landfill operator proposing a new or expanded waste disposal operation within 5 miles of a runway end to notify the appropriate FAA Regional Airports Division Office and the airport operator of the proposal. See 40 CFR § 258, Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, Section 258.10, Airport Safety. The EPA also requires owners or operators of new landfill units, or lateral expansions of existing MSWLF landfill units, that are located within 10,000 feet of any airport runway end used by turbine -powered aircraft, or within 5,000 feet of any airport runway end used. only by piston -type aircraft, to demonstrate successfully that such units are not hazards to aircraft. (See 4.3.2 below.) 2/21 /2020 AC I U/5200-3 3 C 42.1.3 When new or expanded municipal landfills are being proposed near airports, landfill operators must notify the airport operator and the FAA of the proposal as early as possible pursuant to 40 CFR § 258. 4.2.1.4 The FAA discourages the development of waste disposal and other facilities, discussed in Chapter 2, located within the separation criteria specified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. To show that a waste -handling facility sited within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4 does not attract hazardous wildlife and does not threaten aviation, the developer must establish the facility will not handle putrescible material other than that as outlined in 2.2.4. The FAA recommends against any facility other than those outlined in 2.2.4 (enclosed transfer stations). The FAA, will use this information to determine if the facility will be a hazard to aviation. 4.3 Other Land-TJse Practice Changes. 4.3.1 The FAA encourages operators of public -use airports who become aware of proposed land use practice changes that may attract hazardous wildlife within 5 miles of their airports to notify their assigned Airport Certification Safety Inspector or Airports District Office Program Manager. The FAA also encourages proponents of such land use changes to notify the FAA as early in the planning process as possible. Advanced notice affords the FAA an opportunity (1) to evaluate the effect of a particular land - use change on aviation safety and (2) to support efforts by the airport sponsor to restrict the use of land next to or near the airport to uses that are compatible with the airport. 4.3.2 The airport operator, project proponent, or land -use operator may use FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction. or Alteration, or other suitable documents similar to FAA. Form 7460- l to notify the appropriate FAA Regional Airports Division Office. Project proponents can contact the appropriate FAA. Regional Airports Division Office for assistance with the notification process prior to submitting Form 7460-1. 4.3.3 It is helpful if the notification includes a 15-minute quadrangle map of the area identifying the location of the proposed activity. The land -use operator or project proponent should also forward specific details of the proposed land -use change or operational change or expansion. In the case of solid waste landfills, the information should include the type of waste to be handled, how the waste will be processed, and final disposal methods. 4.3.4 Airports that have Received Federal Assistance. Airports that have received. Federal assistance are required under their grant assurances to take appropriate actions to restrict the use of land next to or near the airport to uses that are compatible with normal airport operations. See Grant Assurance 21. The FAA recommends that airport operators oppose off -airport land -use changes or practices, to 4-3 2/21 /2020 AC 150/5200-3 3 C the extent practicable, within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4, which may attract hazardous wildlife. Failure to do so may lead to noncompliance with applicable grant assurances. The FAA will not approve the placement of airport development projects pertaining to aircraft movement in the vicinity of hazardous wildlife attractants without appropriate mitigating measures. Increasing the intensity of wildlife control efforts is not a substitute for preventing, eliminating or reducing a proposed wildlife hazard. Airport operators should identify hazardous wildlife attractants and any associated wildlife hazards during any planning process for airport development projects. 4.4 Coordination to Prevent Creation of Nevi Off -Airport Hazardous Wildlife Attractants. Airport operators should work with local and regional planning and zoning boards to be aware of proposed land -use changes, or modification of existing land uses, that could create hazardous wildlife attractants within the separations identified in Paragraphs 1.2 through 1.4. Pay particular attention to proposed land uses involving creation or expansion of wastewater treatment facilities, development of wetland mitigation sites, or development or expansion of dredge spoil containment areas. At the very least, it is recommended that airport operators are on the notification list of the local planning board or equivalent review entity for all. communities located within 5 miles of the airport, so they will receive notification of any proposed project and have the opportunity to review it for attractiveness to hazardous wildlife. This may be accomplished through one or more of the following: 4.4.1 Site -specific Criteria. The airport should establish site -specific criteria for assessment of land uses attractive to hazardous wildlife and locations that would be of concern based on wildlife strikes and on wildlife abundance and activity at the airport and in the local area. These criteria may be more selective, but should not be less restrictive than this guidance. 4.4.2 Outreach. Airports should actively seek to provide educational information and/ or provide input regarding local development, natural resource modification or wildlife -related concerns that affect wildlife hazards and safe air travel. 4.4.2.1 External Outreach. Airport operators and a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist should consider outreach to local planning and zoning organizations on land uses of concern or to local organizations responsible for natural resource management (including wildlife, wetlands, and parks.) Airports should also consider developing and distributing position letters and educational materials on airport -specific concerns regarding wildlife hazards, wildlife activity and attraction. Finally, airports should provide formal comments on local procedures, laws, ordinances, plans, and regulatory actions such as permits related to land uses of concern. 44 2/21/2020 4.5 4.6 AC 150/5200-33C Internal Outreach. Airports should consider developing and distributing position letters and educational materials on airport -specific concerns regarding species identification and mitigation procedures, wildlife hazards, wildlife activity and attraction to employees and personnel with access to the aircraft operations area. Coordination on Existing Off -Airport ]Eazardous Wildlife Attractants. Airports are encouraged to work with landowners and managers to cooperatively develop procedures to monitor and manage hazardous wildlife attraction. If applicable, these procedures may include: 1. Conducting a wildlife hazard site visit by a wildlife biologist meeting the qualification requirements of Advisory Circular 150/5200-36, Qualifications for Wildlife Biologist Conducting Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Training Curriculums for Airport Personnel Involved in Controlling Wildlife Hazards on Airports 2. Conducting regular, standardized, wildlife monitoring surveys;4 3. Establishing threshold numbers of wildlife which would trigger certain actions and/or communications; 4. Establishment of procedures to deter or remove hazardous wildlife. Prompt Remedial Action. For attractants found on and off airport property, and with landowner or manager cooperation, Part 139 certificated airports must take immediate action In accordance wiA, their Airport Certification Manual and the requirements of Part 139.337, to alleviate wildlife hazards whenever they are detected. It is also recommended that non - certificated airports take immediate action to alleviate wildlife hazards whenever they are detected. In addition, airports should take prompt action to identify the source of attraction and cooperatively develop procedures to mitigate and monitor the attractant. For Part 139 Certificated airports, immediate actions are required in accordance with 139.337(a). FAA Assistance. If there is a question on the implementation of any of the guidance in this section, contact the FAA Regional Airports Division for assistance. 4 Recommended survey protocols can be found in AC 150/5200-38, Protocol for the Conduct and Review of Wildlife Hazard Site Visits, Wildlife Hazard Assessments, and Wildlife Hazard Management Plans, and Devault, T.L., B.F. Blackwell, and J.L. Belant, eds. 2013. Wildlife in Airport Environments: Preventing "tilt Aircraft Collisions through Science -Based Management. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA. 181 pp. 4-5 2/21/2020 4.7.1 Airport Documentation Procedures. AC I U/5zuu- C Airports should document on -site and off -site wildlife attractants as part of their "Wildlife Hazard Management Plan Annual Review," "Wildlife Hazard Management Plan Review Following a Triggering Event," and the airport's Continual Monitoring Annual Report (as outlined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-38). As a best management practice, airports may choose to keep a log to track contacts from landowners or managers, permitting agencies, or other entities concerning land uses near the airport. 4-6 2/21 /2020 AC 10/5200-33C A.l General. This appendix provides definitions of terms used throughout this AC. 1. Air operations area. Any area of an airport used or intended to be used for landing, takeoff, or surface maneuvering of aircraft. An air operations area includes such paved areas or unpaved areas that are used or intended to be used for the unobstructed movement of aircraft in addition to its associated runway, taxiways, or apron. 2. Airport operator. The operator (private or public) or sponsor of a public -use airport. 3. Approach or departure airspace. The airspace, within 5 statute miles of an airport, through which aircraft move during landing or takeoff. 4. Bird balls. l-Iigh-density plastic floating balls that can be used. to cover ponds and prevent birds from using the sites. 5. Certificate holder. The holder of an Airport Operating Certificate issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 139. 6. Construct a new municipal landfill. To begin to excavate, grade land, or raise structures to prepare a municipal solid waste landfill as permitted by the appropriate regulatory or permitting agency. 7. Detention ponds. Storm water management ponds that hold storm water for short periods of time, a few hours to a few days. 8. Establish a new municipal landfill. When the first load of putrescible waste is received on -site for placement in a prepared municipal solid waste landfill. 9. Fly ash. The fine, sand -like residue resulting from the complete incineration of an organic fuel source. Fly ash typically results from the combustion of coal or waste used to operate a power generating plant. 10. General aviation aircraft. Any civil aviation aircraft operating under 14 CFR Part 91. 11. Hazardous wildlife. Species of wildlife (birds, mammals, reptiles), including feral anal domesticated animals, not under control that may pose a direct hazard to ike risk to aircraft) or an indi aviation (i.e., strrect hazard such as an attractant to other wildlife that pose a strike hazard or are causing structural damage to airport facilities (e.g., burrowing, nesting, perching). 12. Municipal Landfill. A publicly or privately owned discrete area of land or an excavation. that receives household waste and that is not a land. application unit, surface impoundment, injection well, or waste pile, as those terms are defined under 40 CFR § 257.2. A municipal. landfill may receive other types wastes, such as commercial solid waste, non -hazardous sludge, small -quantity generator waste, and A-1 2/21/2020 AC 150/5200-33C industrial solid waste, as defined under 40 CFR § 258.2. A municipal landfill can consist of either astand-alone unit or several cells that receive household waste. 13. New municipal landfill. A municipal solid waste landfill that was established or constructed after April 5, 2001. 14. Piston -powered aircraft. Fixed -wing aircraft powered by piston engines. 15. Piston -use airport. Any airport that does not sell Jet -A fuel for fixed -wing powered aircraft, aircraft, and primarily serves fixed -wing, piston -powered aircraft. Incidental use of the airport by turbine -powered, fixed -wing aircraft would not affect this designation. However, such aircraft should not be based at the airport. 16. Public agency. A state or political subdivision of astate, atax-supported organization, or an Indian tribe or pueblo (49 U.S.C. § 47102(19)). 17. Public airport. An airport used or intended to be used for public purposes that is under the control of a public agency; and of which the area used or intended to be used for landing, taking off, or surface maneuvering of aircraft is publicly owned (49 U.S.C. § 47102(20)). 18. Public -use airport. An airport used or intended to be used for public purposes where the area used or intended to be used for landing, taking off, or surface maneuvering of aircraft may be under the control of a public agency or privately owned and used for public purposes (49 U.S.C. § 47102(21)). 19. Putrescible waste. Solid waste that contains organic matter capable of being decomposed by micro-organisms and of such a character and proportion as to be capable of attracting or providing food for birds (40 CFR §257.3-8)0 20. Putrescible-waste disposal operation. Landfills, garbage dumps, underwater waste discharges, or similar facilities where activities include processing, burying, storing, or otherwise disposing of putrescible material, trash, and refuse. 21. Retention ponds. Storm water management ponds that hold water for more than 48 hours. 22. Risk. Risk is the relationship between the severity and probability of a threat. It is the product of hazard level and abundance in the critical airspace, and is thus defined as the probability of a damaging strike with a given species. 23. Runway protection zone. An area off the runway end to enhance the protection of people and property on the ground (see AC 150/5300-13). The dimensions of this zone vary with the airport design, aircraft, type of operation, and visibility minimum. 24. Scheduled air carrier operation. Any common carriage passenger -carrying operation for compensation or hire conducted by an air carrier or commercial operator for which the air carrier, commercial operator, or their representative offers in advance the departure location, departure time, and arrival location. It does not include any operation that is conducted as a supplemental operation under 14 CFR Part 119 or as a public charter operation under 14 CFR Part 3 80 (14 CFR § 119.3) 0 A-2 2/21 /2020 AC I U/5200-33C 25. Sewage sludge. Any solid, semi -solid, or liquid residue generated during the treatment of domestic sewage in a treatment works. Sewage sludge includes, but is not limited to, domestic septage; scum or solids removed in primary, secondary, or advanced wastewater treatment process; and a material derived from sewage sludge. Sewage does not include ash generated during the firing of sewage sludge in a sewage sludge incinerator or grit and screenings generated during preliminary treatment of domestic sewage in a treatment works. (40 CFR § 257.2) 26. Sludge. Any solid., semi -solid, or liquid waste generated form. a municipal, commercial or industrial wastewater treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility or any other such waste having similar characteristics and effect. (40 CFR § 257.2). 27. Solid waste. Any garbage, refuse, sludge, from a waste treatment plant, water supply treatment plant or air pollution control facility and other discarded material, including, solid liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and agricultural operations, and from community activities, but does not include solid or dissolved materials in domestic sewage, or solid or dissolved material in irrigation return flows or industrial discharges which are point sources subject to permits under section 402 of the Clean Water Act, or source, special nuclear, or by product material as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.(40 CFR § 257.2). 28. Turbine -powered aircraft. Aircraft powered by turbine engines including turbojets and turboprops but excluding turbo -shaft rotary -wing aircraft. 29. Turbine -use airport. Any airport that sells fuel for fixed -wing turbine -powered aircraft. 3 0. Wastewater treatment facility. Any devices and/or systems used to store, treat, recycle, or reclaim municipal sewage or liquid industrial wastes, including publicly owned treatment works, as defined by Section 212 of the Clean Water Act. This definition includes any pretreatment involving the reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater prior to or in lieu of discharging or otherwise introducing such pollutants into a publicly owned treatment system. (See 40 CFR § 403.3 (q), 31. Wildlife. Any wild animal, including without limitation any wild. mammal, bird, reptile, fish, amphibian, mollusk, crustacean, arthropod, coelenterate, or other invertebrate, including any part, product, egg, or offspring thereof. 50 CFR § 10.12. As used in this AC, wildlife includes feral animals and domestic animals out of the control of their owners (14 CFR Part 139, Certification of Airports). 32. Wildlife attractants. Any human. -made structure, land -use practice, or human - made or natural geographic feature that can attract or sustain hazardous wildlife within the landing or departure airspace or the airport' s aircraft operations area. These attractants can include architectural features, landscaping, waste disposal sites, wastewater treatment facilities, agricultural or aquaculture activities, surface mining, or wetlands. A-3 2/21 /2020 AC 1 )U/5200-33C 33. Wildlife hazard. A potential for a damaging aircraft collision with wildlife on or near an airport. 34. Wildlife strike. A wildlife strike is deemed to have occurred when: a. A strike between wildlife and aircraft has been witnessed; b. Evidence or damage from. a strike has been identified on an aircraft; c. Bird or other wildlife remains, whether in whole or in part, are found: i. within 250 feet of a runway centerline or within 1,000 feet of a runway end unless another reason for the animal's death is identified or suspected, unless another reason for the animal's death is identified or, ii. On a taxiway or anywhere else on or off airport that there is reason to believe was the result of a strike with an aircraft. d. The presence of birds or other wildlife on or off the airport had a significant negative effect on a flight (i.e., aborted takeoff, aborted landing, high-speed emergency stop, aircraft left pavement area to avoid collision with animal). 2/21 /2020 AC 150/5200-3 3 C APPENDIX B. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES B.l Regulations • l 4 CFR § 139.337, Wildlife Hazard Management • 40 CFR § 258, CNiteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills B.2 Advisory Circulars • AC 150/5200-32, Reporting Wildlife Aircraft Strikes AC 150/5200-33, Hazard Wildlife Attractants on o� Neap Ai�po�ts • AC 150/5200-34, Construction or Establishment of New Landfills Near Public Airports • AC 150/5200-36, Qualifications for Wildlife Biologist Conducting Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Training Curriculums for Airport Personnel Involved in Controlling Wildlife Hazards on Airports • AC 150/5200-38, Protocol for the Conduct and Review of Wildlife Hazard Site Visits, Wildlife Hazard Assessments, and Wildlife Hazard Management Plans • AC 150/5220-25, Airport Avian Radar Systems • AC 150/5210-24, Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Management B.3 Certification Alerts • Certalert No. 97-09, Wildlife Hazard Management Plan Outline (11/17/1997) • Certalert No. 98-05, Grasses Attractive To Hazardous Wildlife (9/21/1998) • Certalert No. 06-07, Requests by State Wildlife Agencies to Facilitate and Encourage Habitat fog State Listed Threatened and Endangered Species and Species of Special Concern on Airports (11/21/2006) • CertalertNo. 13-01, Federal and State Depredation Permit Assistance (1/30/2013) • Certalert No.14-O 1, Seasonal Mitigation of Hazardous Species at Airports.* Attention to Snowy Owls (2/26/2014) • Certalert No. 16-03, Recommended Wildlife Exclusion Fencing (8/2016) B-1 2/21/2020 B.4 Airport Cooperative Research Program Reports AC 150/5200-33C These, and other wildlife /aviation reports, are available from the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies (TRB) at http://www.trb.org/Publ ications/Publ ications.aspx. • ACRP Research Report 198: Wetland Mitigation, Volume 2, A Guidebook for Airports (2019) • ACRP Synthesis 92: Airport Waste Management and Recycling Practices (2018) • ACRP Research Report 174: Guidebook and Primer (2018) • ACRP Report 122: Innovative Airport Responses to Threatened /Endangered Species (2015) • ACRP Report 125: Balancing Airport Stormwater and Bird Hazard Management (2015) • ACRP Report 145: Applying an SMS Approach to Wildlife Hazard Management (2015) • ACRP Synthesis 39 Report: Airport Wildlife Population Management (2013) • ACRP Synthesis 52 Report: Habitat Management to Deter Wildlife at Airports (2014) • ACRP Synthesis 23 Report: Bird Harassment, Repellent, and Deterrent Techniques for Use on and Near Airports (2011) • ACRP Report 32: Guidebook for Addressing Aircraft/Wildlife Hazards at General Aviation Airports (2010) B.5 Manuals • Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports - A Manual for Airport Personnel (2005) B.6 Orders • 50 CFR § 21.49, Control Order for Resident Canada Geese at Airports and Military Airfields • 50 CFR § 21.50, Depredation Order for Resident Canada Geese Nests and Eggs • 50 CFR § 21.43) Depredation Order for Blackbirds, Cowbirds, Crows, Grackles, and Magpies • 50 CFR § 21.54, Control Order for Muscovy Ducks in the United States • 50 CFR § 21.55, Control Order for Invasive Migratory Birds in Hawaii B -2 Advisory Circular Feedback If you find an error in this AC, have recommendations for improving it, or have suggestions for new items/subjects to be added, you may let us know by (1) mailing this form to Manager, Airport Safety and Operations Division, Federal Aviation Administration ATTN: AAS-300, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington DC 20591 or (2) faxing it to the attention of AAS-300 at (202) 267-5257. Subject: AC 150/5200-33C Please check all app�op�iate lzne items: Date ❑ An error (procedural or typographical) has been noted in paragraph on page ❑ Recommend. paragraph on page ❑ In a future change to this AC, please cover the following subject: (Briefly describe what you want added.) ❑ Other comments: be changed as follows: ❑ I would like to discuss the above. Please contact me at (phone number, email address). Submitted by: Date: MIL3 %A Wrmil%B W L" LIM -a Now 3 1 E a 0 N N O N Do N 3 .0 0 N T' W 0 Z rL w V) ammm 0 PUD WATERFORD ESTATES A C mD � m D �7 m p AUKINS AVENUE RPUD ONYX NORTH SCALE IN FEET LEGEND - -EXISTING SIDEWALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 3.05.07.B) 10 PUD DEVIATION PRESERVE SETBACKS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 25 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 FEET PROPOSED SANDY LANE RPUD 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF POTENTIAL INTERCONNECTION SHADOWWOOD SUBDIVISIONS A 10 MIN. TYPE "D" C,,� BUFFER01 SUBJECT TO CONDITION 5.2.H, 0 623' NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB � 324' 1660 10' IN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' IN, TYPE "B" FOR MF LANDSCAPE BUFFER SUBJECT TO CONDITION 5.9.C. TRACT E Ingress/Egre I� (TBD at SDP/PPL) I 01 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF I 15 MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF o A CD P EL 6A 6.06Alt ST 660 zz NON ST c��l c m 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF PB PAGE SHADOWWOOD 19 78-79 � SHADOWWOOD VILLAS 23 86-87 REPLAT OF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 95-99 31 WING SOUTH Al RPARK EXT 61 20-21 SHADOW PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY DESCRIPTION ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS TRACTA -RESIDENTIAL 39.67± 194 TRACT E - RESIDENTIAL 77.98± 364 TRACT B 5.68± 16 TRACTC-SINGLE-FAMILY 41.78± N/A RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE DRIVE 3.00± N/A TOTA LS 168.1± 574 GROSS DENSITY 3.41 UN ITS/ACRE PRESERVE 3.8ACRES±PER RZ-59 REVISIONS 11/27/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 12/02/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 1/17/20 REV. PER COUNTY PLANNER 06/11/20 REV. PER CCBBC 02/18/21 REV. PRESERVE AREA 06/04/21 REV. NORTHERN ACCESS 07/02/21 REV. NORTHERN ACCESS 01/07/22 ADD DEVIATION NOTE 03/29/22 ADD BUFFER CONDITION 05/24/22 ADD SANDY LANE RPUD NOTE 07/28/22 REVISED BUFFER CONDITION HOLE MONTES ENo11E:.ES I LUIDSC�PE ?kCHTEC i S I F7.�lUI�iS I SURIfY()RS 0 0 PRESERVE 2.o AC. O 6 16 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER PARKERS HAMMOCK R RSF-3 z cn z HOMES OF ISLANDIA LASIP CONSERVATION AREA i i 193' 0 !RSF-4 PUD NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER RSF-4 WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS REC�, � BUFFER 2 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD PUD LELY RESORT 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 Phone: (239) 254-2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization No.1772 ENGINEERING 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 203B Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 1� 115 — — COLLEGE PARK SHADOWWOOD PUD MASTER PLAN DATE PROJECT N0. SCALE SHEET 01 /2020 2021-015 As Shown 1 OF 1 t \1We We _ 'IV��•� S 40310 ON 1 Aft, We r > v., ¢" lies Y_ -•. 1No - OWN v � ��l \• _r A:J. .-Z....-. N I ON N AN Joe �- IN. w , + Now""� / i + /tAN ! 1, I 11 RESERVE MPU . 4 �# Volume OF IF NIL pow I N Vol --yIt VNIF op f Vol fr. to IV INN - :''^i +'r•, �.rCj art i �17+'� • Ir No NN Nor? No - Well Ner off — No I— — _ qrr+...�� _ — It p C a jJ NON w ell COMMON PROPERTY LINE pow- r AND SANDY LANE PUD I Nor WIN tow"% - I �1 We NN It A Wool AN No IF or MAN No N All of MA WNVA 1 1 t iIN ! " No NINO INN A INN We r Off 4W Now, mold 0 No IN NINO ;Fee till ` e tid ' ~[: `'- y ''►i♦\�'`+�f:.�•- \ IF .. �. _ .. ... i ..y t .y10 -� New,ON ive oe Vol S . Not AN iI� Wide I We IF IN l 4a+. Ait r .t . i -4VW �_ r No F OWN wp NIX,; Nd r,• r I' 1. INN WIN OWN .olo��totioi. - lit o 4N WIN NINA It WIN to IN 41 We oI 11 NIL NINO Never lb? Joe. tar AN iN Now 0 Ne We ".�yn No WeImpol a for .x,i op U0 yp to No 14 solo r f^lea 0 to No ot FAAA AV I A [=.',I � � f * �q��•�,' N '.t! 1 TrepilcocK planning •engineering October 19, 2021 Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department 2685 Horseshoe Drive S, Suite 103 Naples, FL34104 P 239025262926 1 E Michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: ShadowWood PUDA Letter of No Additional Transportation Impacts -TIS Waiver DearMr. Sawyer: We are providing this Letter of No Additional Transportation Impacts -TIS Waiver for the ShadowWood PUDA. The project is located east of Santa Barbara Boulevard and north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Ordinance No. 20-17 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County in June of 2020. The ordinance identified two points of access for the development: off Whitaker Road and off Polly Avenue. Figure 1 shows the approximate location of the two approved access points. Figure 1: Ordinance 20-17 Approved Access Points Lo Jack � - F,r�: ;t 5Q°'° r 1 Haven�Q � s Y G Wing So h Airpark Adkate Ave aWw ^s A �d Gol/ Club - 51mm u, E+ara!e �t - Calusa Palrns Nursery Shadowwood tea. �t unary Club ManorCare Health vices at Lely Pal 25% �.44, IL Rattlesnake = Hammock s 9 Rattfes�aka Hammock Road Inspira ApartrnernsFlorida f HQA Laar1 Specialists o: Sierra College Paris E Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA • 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 •Naples, FL 34104 Phone 239.566.9551 • www.trebilcock.biz Shadow Wood PUDA Letter of No Additional Transportation Impacts -TIS Waiver October 19, 2021 Page 2 of 3 The ordinance included a trip cap of 187 two-way PM peak hour trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. No change is proposed to the trip cap. The developer, Naples Associates VI, LLLP, is interested in changing the Polly Avenue access to an interconnection with the proposed Sandy Lane PUD, This is schematically shown in Figure 2. Traffic that was projected to utilize the Polly Avenue access will now utilize the Sandy Lane Interconnect. Figure 2: Proposed Shadow Wood —Sandy Lane Interconnect Haven ag��o Ram go Woo a! Golf y Club Calusa Lo Jack 40% VWM&kes Red ,b a a a PMr Ara 0°!0 a Ari;ns I�ve untry Club ManorCare Health ices at Lely Pal Ilk Sandy Lang Iinterconnect 20° —�— 80% i Ty7 Wing South Airpark A4k.�a J4.s Shadowwood Rattlesnake Hammock o Rattlesnake Hammock R ad Inspira Apartments 9 HC}A Loan Spec Ste' Florida Sierra t College Park A The net result of this change is a reduction in traffic volume on Whitaker Road, between Polly Avenue and Santa Barbara Boulevard, from 100% of the Shadow Wood traffic to 80% of the traffic. The traffic generated by the interconnect has been taken into consideration in the TIS for the proposed Sandy Lane development titled "Sandy Lane Assemblage Residential Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ)", prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA, dated 2/19/2021, so no change is needed to that TIS. A signal warrant analysis was prepared for the intersection of Country Road (Crews Road) and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Refer to the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis for Sandy Lane Assemblage prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA, dated 7/29/2021. The traffic associated with the interconnect was included in that analysis, so no modification of the signal warrant analysis is needed. The conclusions in the signal warrant analysis are unchanged with the interconnect. Shadow Wood PUDA Letter of No Additional Transportation Impacts - TIS Waiver October 19, 2021 Page 3of3 As noted above, there are no additional transportation impacts associated with deleting the access to Polly Avenue and adding the interconnect with the Sandy Lane PUD. The impacts are de minimis and as a result, we are requesting a TIS waiver for this change. If you have questions, we are available to discuss our findings with you. Sincerely, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA f � i I r.. / t / / " •' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE PA IL 0 Mill lillill I1 1 • �'iN E 60 'Wor .OMMISSIONE1� ! M FLORIDA E LMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER; •• AMENDED, HADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), TO DESIGNATE ACRES • i FROM TRACT i'RIVATEt. PARKDISTRICT,OTRACTRESIDENTIAL i OPMENT; BY ADDING THE DEVELOPMENT OTANit r iR R,CT E* BY AMENDING THE MASTER 'LAN TO ADD i POINTS TO PROVIDEAND TRACTGRESS TO i I POLLY MOVING,REQUIREMENT ALL ACCESS • i 10 THE i ARE PRIVATE ROADS; iEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ACRES PART r ACRE i LOCATED AT WING SOUTH AIR PARK, EAST OF SANTA t'. A'• BOULEVARD DAVISBOULEVARD AND RANGEE LORIDA,''111 r ` i ` I • � E � � � � � � O ` � r ` ` � � ' r S Hagan Engineering, LLC and Clyde Quinby of Clyde C. Quinby Realty, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PI..�D. COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COLI��TY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification, [l9-CPS-01866/1527066/I ] 167 ShadowWood PUDA � PL20190000259 3/4/20 SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this �� day of _ JuNe Zo2o. ATTEST ` • Q . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRSTA 6 KIN . _ �4;CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • j .r it By: ===,mi0 Clerk Approved as to form and legality: err H idi Ashton-Cicko '�'`'� Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - PUD Document [19-CPS-01866/1527066/1 ] 167 ShadowWood PUDA � PL20190000259 3/4/20 Page 2 of 2 Burt L. Saunders, Chairman This ordinvnCe filed wifih the Se ry of tc��e's C)�f ice the ay of and ocknowledgern riV thor fi(in received his ---- — day of . L Ry Deputy ` �t s Mr• • Naples,FL33924 i r r r ' � •i�li .s• a•s it !• � � i ". :`- . • '! � � !' `i • - .•!'• A PAGE 5ECTION I 1-2 SECTION II • 0 SECTIOIrI IV i A A � ► t - _ A l t i i A i A JILIIIII If 1,47 i �` A i A PRIVATE iA AIR PARK A! DISTRICT SECTIfJN V SECTION VI SECTION I The purpose of this section is to express the intent of The Rookery, Ltd., 706 Sth Avenue South, Naples, Florida to develop ± 168.1 acres of land located in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this proposal development shall hence forth be known as ShadowWood, !' AL i� i .•i iii s � . -i �` i! �• i i ` i. ti. and if i i i . i Comprehensive iii. developmentassociated recreational. ! . . . i • i fi i ii regulations i Comprehensive s ! Use Element and other applicable di i following ` s i 1. The subject property has the necessary rating points to determine availability of adequate community facilities and services. 2. The project development is compatible with and complimentary to the surrounding land uses. 3 . The subject property will provide a vegetative buffer between. the property and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the surrounding vacant lands, and the single family residential units to the west. 4. The development shall consist primarily of multi -family residential clusters and shall thereby provide snore common open space. 5. The development shall utilize natural systems for water management such as the cypress, willow, lower wetland areas, and natural drainage courses. 6. The development shall promote the maintenance of the residential neighborhood and be aesthetically pleasing and functionally efficient. -1- 7. The number of egress and ingress points shall be limited to minimize the impact upon the traffic flow along Rattlesnake I�ammock l�.oad. $. The development is complimentary to and consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. 9. The land may be used more efficiently, and made more desirable resulting in a smaller network of utilities and streets with consequent lower construction and future maintenance costs. l l . T`he project Will enable and encourage compatibility With the natural amenities of the environmental as well. as preserve and enhance present advantages. 1 Z. The application of the development plan will permit flexibility and feature amenities and excellence in the form of variations in siting, mixed land uses and varied dwelling types, as well as adaptation to and conservation of the topography and other natural characteristics of the land, 13. With. proper uniform quality large scale development, the project may best serve the public interest With alternate mixed land uses. -�- SECTION II STATEMENT OF INTENT It is the property owner's intention to continue the development. of a single and multi -family residential prof ect with recreational, commercial, and aviational facilities, and other support facilities required of a development surroundin g initiated in the early 1970's with the develoizem with common facilities. a private a ir park community . The project was t of single family residential condominium lots As part of the same property, it is the intent of The Rookery, Ltd. to continue to develop a condominium complex consisting of cluster villages; multi -family residential units; single family residential lots; and varied dwelling unit types. The units shall be centered around major points such as the air park, lakes, pine and cypress trees, common open space, and areas of unique vegetation. There may be recreational benefits consisting of jogging trails, para courses, private swimming pools, neighborhood parks, tennis courts, and the unique feature of a private airpark. Residents of this project shall be afforded the opportunity to own private airplanes and a single family residential or condominium unit with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and commercial services among a natural scenic environmental setting. The residential development of low-rise multi -family and single family units shall demonstrate a quality way of life for its residents that will be eminently desirable, esthetically pleasing, and environmentally sound. -3- • 3.1. PROPERTY O�J7'�ERSI-IIP: The subject property is currently under the control of The Rookery, Ltd. 706 5th Avenue South, Naples, Florida 33940. 3.2. LECAL DESCRIPTION: The subject property is described as follows: The east 1 /2 of the east 1 /2 and; the north l /2 of the northwest 1 /4 of the northeast 1 /4; the southeast 1 /4 of the northwest 1 /4 of the northeast 1 /4 and; all being in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. ALSO LESS the south fifty (50) feet for road right-of-way and any easement right-of-way of public record. LESS WING SOUTH AIR PARK PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT 1, a Condominium, according to the Declaration of Condominium recorded in Official Record Boob 476, pages 304 to 350, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as amended. -4- SECTION Iv 4.1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to set forth. the regulations for development of the property identii ed on the Master Development Plan. It is the intent of the project sponsor to develop multifamily and single family residences in a low profile silhouette with ample common open space associated with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and commercial services. For the purposes �e project plan of gross residential land use area, the subject property is � 168.1 acres. i ncluding street layout and land uses is illustrated in Exhibit "B", PUD Master Plan. The project shall consist of � four land configuration as shown in Exhibit it Tracts A & E-��-� Residential Tracts B - Single Family Residential Tract C - Private Air Parr District Entrance Drive use tracts of general area and �� 117.65 Acres 5.68 Acres 41.78 Acres 3.0 Acres 168.09 1 Acres Assuming favorable economic anal market conditions, it is the project sponsor's intent to complete development of the property within six years. The total maximum residential. units will be 574 units at a maximum density of 3.4 units per gross acre. i A. Purpose: i - - r Master Plan / Tracts • i E, ! • •. i rr Residential ILILLIILJ $. Tract A -Permitted Uses and Structures: No buildings or structures, or part thereof, shall be used, in whole or part, for other than the following: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Multi -Family Residences. b. Common open. space, recreational facilities and water management facilities. c. Nine hole golf course with the typical facilities of a private country club. 2. Permitted Accessory tTses and Structures: a. Customary accessory uses and structures. b. Signs as permitted at tithe of permit application. c. Airplane hangers and tie downs. d. Private road, pedestrian and bicycle paths, boardwalks and cross- walks, jogging and nature appreciation trails, or other similar facilities constructed for purposes of access to or passage through the common areas. e. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage. • i l . Permitted. Principal Uses and Structures: c. Two-family and d for fee simple co the residence; hed dwellir��s; lex dwellings, 'i i • i • • • " •-i R, w Multi. -family dwellin Anv f_I to) Ulm o ther Accessory Uses: ce In rinciDai use which. _ is com dated wi ►arable in nature with the as determined by the BZA, Pc�nry �� end structures customarily associated with _the permitted Accesso uses and structures customarily associated with principal fitted in this land use tract, incl00111 uding swimming pools, spas, docks,.. l,nat hn»�P� qnd screen enclosures. recreational faWOMMOTE cilities desi b. Model 14, and model home centers including offices for protect adrninistration_constructon, sales and marketing; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar u�eC intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their gists. PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_06/11/20 Words n{��'� ��rn� are deleted; words underlined are added. D. Tracts A and E -Maximum Dwelling Units: A maximum of S 5 8 residential dwelling units. �E. Tract A —Minimum Yard Requirements far Principal Structures: 1. Depth from property boundary line (35) feet. 2. Depth from edge of all private paved roads (25) feet. 3. Minimum distance between any two (2) principal structures on the same parcel shall be fifteen (15) feet. 4. Minimum distance between a development phase, or condominium tract line and any principal structure shall be seven and one-half (7.5) feet. �F. Tract. A —Minimum Yard Requirements for Accessory Structures: As required. by the Collier County zoning Ordinance. �G. Tract A —Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures: 900 Square feet for each dwelling unit. �I-I. Tract A —Maximum Height of Principal Structure: Three (3) living stories above one story of parking with a maximum height of forty- five (45) feet. In order to comply with the minimum flood elevation requirements, the maximum height of a structure shall be measured from the 'III base flood elevation required by the Flood Elevation Ordinance. _g_ I. Tract E Develoizment Standards: TABLE I — TRACT E RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE- SINGLE- TOWNHOMES MULTI- AMENITIES FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY DETACHED ATTACHED DWELLING & SIN GL& FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Min. Lot Area 1,600 sf 1,600 sf 14,100 SF 1 acre N/A Min. Lot width 32' 32' 18' 150' N/A Min. Front Yard 12' 1 12' 20', or '/2 BH, 15' 23' S 23'(S whichever is eater. Min. Side Yard 5' 0' or 10' (2) 0' or 5 (2)(4) 1/2/ BH4� 5, or'/z BH, whichever is reater. Min. Rear Yard 5', or .. S', or 20' from 5 % or 20' from 15' or 1/2 BH, 5, or '/2 BHA from alley (,3� all a1�(31 whichever is whichever is eater. greater. Min. Distance 10' 10' 10' `12 SBH `/2 SBH between structures Max. Zoned 3 5' 3 5' 3 5' 3 5' 3 5' Bldg. Height Min. Floor Area 1000 sf 1000 sf 900 sf 900 sf N/A Max. Actual 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' Bldg. Height Preserve Setback 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Min Front Yard SPS SPS SPS SPS 12' Min. Side Yard SPS .SPS SPS SPS SPS Min. Rear Yard 5' SPS SPS 5' SPS Preserve Setback 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Max. Zoned Bld . Hei ht SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Max. Actual Bldg. Height SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Prl BH: Building Heiht SBH: Sum of Buildr. N/A: Nat Applicable _y_ Front • i setbacksshall be measured fromRight�Of�Way line and shall allow a 246ot separation Easement,from the structure to the Public Utilily If side vard setback is 0 feet on one i` r i shall be 1 feet forr total buildium separation Alley setbacksshallbe measured from• i` accessed from alleys at `! • i •i` i • i`i d ii `s • • i i•` ! is � Id NFU} the ground floor exterior wallLas lon depicted in Figure 1, below. M'1MV� ked across 1 Vre._ORffw0i - - - inimum I5-foot buildi 23 feet fron t in depth s 'the sidewalk, except for side to idel to avoid vehicles from bei Amenities must maintain a 1 o0-foot �_1.00'� separation from all external boundaries of T Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks - l o- i `ii11 .�f ••� � i� i. i � i ". ;.�• . ` i` _ -! i ! i` `i i•'� J. Minimum off -Street Parking: Two (2) parking spaces per residential unit with a minimum of 1.5 spaces/unit paved and .5 parking space/unit reserved for paving at a time to be appropriate by the County. �K. Llmltatlon on Slgns: As permitted by the zoning ordinance in effect at time of application for building permit. 4.4. TR:ACT B: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to set forth the development plan and land regulations for the areas designated on PUD Master Plan as Tract B, Single Family Residential. B. Permitted Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Single Family Residences. b. Common open space & water management facilities. 2. Permitted Accessary Uses and Structures: a. Customary accessory uses and structures. b. Recreational uses and facilities. c. Airplane hangars or tie downs. C . Maximum Dwelling Units A maximum of 16 residential. dwelling units may be constructed. D. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front 'Ward - 25 feet 2. Side Yard - 7.5 feet 3. Rear Yard - 25 feet 4. Accessory structure as required by current zoning ordinance. -11- I. J. Minimum Lot width: 100 feet. Minimum Lot Area: 12,000 square feet. Minimum floor Area of Principal St�ucture: 11/Iaxrnum Height of Principal Structures: Three (3) stories above the finish grade of lot or from the minimum base flood elevation required by the flood elevation ordinance. off -Street Parking Requirements Two (2) spaces, at least one of which shall be located within the building area. Landscaping and Buffer: permitted All buildings, enclosures, or other structures constructed for purposes of maintenance, shall have appropriate screening and landscaping. 4.5. TR:ACT C: PRIVATE AIR PARK. DISTRICT: A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to indicate the development plan and Land regulations far the areas designated on the PUD Master Plan as Tract "C", Private Air Park District. B. Development Plan: l . The primary purpose of this Tract will be to provide the necessary aviational support facilities to accommodate a private airport. These areas shall be utilized onl y in accordance with the provisions necessary to maintain and operate the private air park. 2. Except in areas to be used for water impoundment and principal. or accessory use areas, all. natural. trees and. other vegetation as buffer shall be protected and preserved so long as such plant life shall not interfere with the control of airspace within 700 feet from the end of the primary runway surface. -12- C. Uses Permitted: 1�T0 building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Airport runway and administration building. c. Aviational fueling and service shop. d. Aviational maintenance and service shop. e. Water management facilities. f. Any other similar aviational support. facilities that maybe necessary or compatible with the operations of a private air park. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a. Accessory uses customarily associated with the uses district. permitted in this b. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage. c. Signs as permitted at dine of permit application. D. Minimum. Yard Requirements: l . Setback from edge of primary runway surface - l00 feet. 2. Other structures must conform with setbacks of the abutting properties land use regulations; however, they may not be placed within fifty (50) feet of the primary runway surface. E. Control of Airspace: The control of the airspace within 700 feet from the ends of the primary runway surface shall be adhered to by the project sponsor. The control shall be of such a nature as to prevent any airport hazards from being grown, erected, or otherwise placed within a glide path of 20:1 from the ends of the primary runway surface. -13- s SECTION v GENEp:AL DE'VELOPMENT COMITMEI�TTS 5.1 PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for development of the project 5.2 P.U.D. MASTER PLAN: The PUD Master Plan is an illustrative preliminary development plan. The design criteria and layout ill flexible so that the final design may applicable requirements. ustrated on the Master Plan shall satisfy the project and be understood as comply with all All necessary easements,. dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. D. Minor design changes shall. be permitted subject to staff approval. E. Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structure, locations of all improved facilities, and location and treatment of buffer areas. CF. Areas illustrated as "lakes" shall be constructed lakes, or upon approval,. parts thereof nlay be green areas in which as much natural foliage as practical shall be preserved. Such areas, lakes and/or natural green areas, shall be of general area and configuration as shown on the Master Plan, Gam. Wetland subzones "A- l , A-2, A-3, �3►--� C- l , E-1 and E-2" (Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll &Peek, Ine. Drawing File 1�To. 1�:.�-59, Sheet 2 of 2), are illustrative sub zones and will be conserved as much as practicable as storm water management/open space areas. These areas will be flagged for protection, prior to development. -14- and. will not adver�ely 5.5. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL. Traci V. access will he limited to one connection at Polly Avenue and one connection at Whitaker Road. 5.4. WATER IIANAGEMENT. A. Detailed water management construction plans shall be submitted to and approved by the County Engineer prior to commencement of any construction. B. Appropriate easements to be granted to Collier County for maintenance of perimeter swale system. Al�;� physical ilnprovelnents that directly impact the components of the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Program (LASIP) will comply with the .LASIP permit impact flow/conveya,_ nce. Such arrangement and agreements as necessary shall be made with. an approved solid waste disposal service to provide for solid waste collection service to all areas of the project. S.d REC�:EATION FACILITIES A minimum of �n-ee two swimming pools and �1�=ee one tennisd�;�ll courts shall be constructed oy the project sponsor. Additional recreational facilities may be constructed by the future residents of this project. 5.7 TRAFFIC A. The project sponsor will provide to the appropriate governmental agency, an additional right -of --way of 17.5 feet along the south property boundary line for future road widening of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. B. The project sponsor agrees to construct a right and left turn storage lame on Rattlesnake Hammock Road for traffic entering ShadowWood and to pay for his proportionate share of the costs of a traffic signal at the project entrance when required by the appropriate governmental agency. C. A sidewalk shall be constructed on one side of the main entrance road into the project. -15- The maximum total trip generation for Tract E shall not exceed 187 two-way P peak hour trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Prior to Bevel r condominium association, the ►er shall pay to County up to $uvivvv for the County'6 design costs for ;alminia initiated by the owner's under the Collier County Neighborhood • - ! r •I I-! Traffic management Pro Aram and County' s installation costs, or up to for County -initiated traffic calminiz including but not limited to stripin ! commitment will terminate u n.issuance of the 273th certificate of occupanc for Tract E if no traffic calming measures have been initiated by owners in the Pa MaparaTIMMITE 5.8 UTILITIES A. A central water supply system shall be made available to all areas of the project. The water supply source for the project shall be the County system. B. All areas of the project shall be served by a central wastewater collection system and by an existing offsite wastewater treatment plant. The existing plant shall be expanded as may be needed to meet the anticipated demands. Plans and D.E.R. permit applications for the sewage treatment plant shall be submitted to the Utility Division. C. The project sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable County laws and ordinances governing utility provisions and facilities. D. Telephone, power and T.V. cable service shall be made available to all. residential areas. All such utility lines shall. be installed underground. E. The developer of Tract E shall provide water main stub -outs at any project vehicular connection to the public roadway system The required stub -outs shall be a minimum size of 8 inches and shall be located within the road ri ht-of-wa and shall be established within a County Utility Easement (CUE) to be dedicated to the �.-..� 1,�s+ ■ r„sa4i ��/ ntot' �L�lSl�t 1 liC�ir•11�t (Tlictrir�tl Thp CT TF_c Phall hP �'hnwn can a n v f�nal 1ylSlon I Ttilities an Standards d P the County or District, to concurrent with �prelimin; Mier Co unty rocedurime Cardinance ,Card. 04-31 as amended} at no cost free andclear of all liens and encumbrances, r to or prio acceptance of utilities. -16- S .9 ErTVIRO A listed species survey shall be included in submittal materials associated with the for next occurring development order request (i.e.: PPL or SDP%% TrE act . The required survey must be less than 12 months old for listed species known to inhabit biological communitiessimilar to those found on site (LDC 3.04.00). The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC and the U.S. Fish A Wildlife Servi(USFWS . AI�:D �F CCU runway uses in Tract C of the PUD. B. Future residents in Tract E wiC associated noise issues Drior to be notif ied of the existi� urchase in written form. e taxiway or ' 1 `fill ` .•• •••' �� i. l M � ". :. . !_ - .! � • !- -� , .t�"! SECTION VI Deviation #1 seeps relief from LDC Section 4.0 02.A.,Aplicablit of buffer requirements, associated with the arivate which requires a landsc airstrip1 to allow no buffer. Given the adiacent, offsite preserve abutting the easterly Pt1D boundarv. no landscape buffer is required. WATERFORD ESTATES D � rnp a ONYX NORTH SCALE IN FEET LEGEND - -EXISTING SIDEWALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 10S.07.13) OPUD DEVIATION PRESERVE SETBACKS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 25 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 FEET 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF 10' MIN. TYPE "D" � CO,4 BUFFER U? SHADOWWOOD SUBDIVISIONS PB PAGE SHADOWWOOD 19 78-79 21 SHADOWWOOD VILLAS 23 86-87 31 REPLAT OF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 95-99 4 WING SOUTH AIRPARK EXT 61 20-21 623' Ingress/Egr s (TBD at SDP/PPL) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB 2324 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' IN. TYPE "B" FOR MF I I � �O 10' MIN, TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF 70066CL 0 PARCEL 16A O qqr 6,06 ACRES v ST 660 NON s T c 10' MIN, TYPE "A" FOR SF— 15' MIN, TYPE "B" FOR MF 65 ' 16 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER -� 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER PARKERS HAh1MOCK F RSF-3 PARK �p (2 AC.t) HOMES OF ISLANDIA LASIP CONSERVATION AREA O W 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF Cp o� 132' 500' 193 0 RSF4 PUD NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB RSF-4 WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS REC�� SHADOW PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY TRACT A DESCRIPTION ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS R n A C_� TRACTA-RESIDENTIAL 39.67± 194 '�/' I 20' MIN. TYPE "D" TRACT E - RESIDENTIAL 77.98± 364 BUFFER TRACT B 5.68± 16 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD TRACT C -SIN GLE-FAMILY 41.7$± N/A RESIDENTIAL PUD ENTRANCE DRIVE 3.00± NJA LELY RESORT TOTALS 168.1± 574 GROSS DENSITY 3.41 UNITS/ACRE PRESERVE REVISIONS 9/2/19 (REVISED PER RAI #3 3.8 ACRESf PER RZ-59 10/23/19 REVISED PER RAI #4 10/28/19 REVISED PER ENVIR. STAFF 11/25/19 REVISED PER PLANNING STAFF 11/27/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 12/02/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 1/17/20 REV. PER COUNTY PLANNER 06/11/20 REV. PER CCBBC 1✓NGINE E RING 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 203E Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER is 1s 21 „ COLL EGE PARK SHADOVVWOOD PUDA PL 20190000259 SHADOWWOOD PUD MASTER PLAN DATE PROJECT N0. SCALE SHEET O1 /2020 2019-240 As Shown 1 OF 1 Governor June 17, 2020 Ms. Ann P. Jennejohn, Bl'�iR Senior Deputy Clerk Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court k Comptroller of Collier County 3329 Tamiami Trail E, Suite #401 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Ms. Jennejohn: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.6b, electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance Sincerely, Ernest L. Reduick .Program Administrator LAUREL M. LEE Secretary of State Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your No. 20-17, which was fileu in this office on June 1'7, 2020. NIM SU IVIMAR.Y SANDY LANE RPUDZ (PL-20200001208) & S]EIADO*XYWOOD PUDA (PL-20210001253) Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall - Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104 The NIM vvas held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Sandy Lane RPUD (PL-20200001208). The subject site is approx. 114.56� acres and is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd., approximately one-half mile south of Davis Blvd, in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. The property is currently zoned A- Agricultural. The applicant proposes to rezone the property to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow the construction of 640 dwelling units (single-family and multifamily) for a gross density of 5.59 units/acre. The primary entry into the site is proposed to connect directly to Santa Barbara, with.a secondary, resident --only entrance to Country Road, 2. Shadowwood PIJDA (PL-20210001253). The subject site is approx. 16$.10� acres, and allows for single and multifamily residential, and a private air park. The applicant owns Tract E of the PUD, totaling approx. 78 acres. The PUD is generally located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive approximately three quarters of a mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The requested amendment would add an interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD to the north as well as add deviations and additional developer commitments. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Attendees: On behalf of Applicants: Richard Arkin, GL Homes (Applicant) John Asher, GL Homes (Applicant) Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman Yovanovich Koester Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, Inc. Paula McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning, Hole Montes, Inc. Shane Johnson, Passarella & Associates, Inc. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA County Staff: Ray B ellovvs, Planr�.ng Manager, Zoning Services Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Approximately 50 members of the public attended. Page 1 of 3 H:\2020\2020028A\WP\PUDZ\2nd I�1IM\NIM Summary (5-13-2022).docx I irs. McMichael started the presentation by introducing herself, the applicant, the other consultants, and county staff. She explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history and overview of the project. The following commentslquestions were raised by the members of the public in attendance: Proposed Deviations The new deviations request relief from internal sign development standards; private right -of --way width requirements, to allow no buffer between the Sandy Lane RPUD and Shadowwood PUD if developed by the same developer as one, unified community; and to allow for an increased number of model homes. Lane RPUD Native Vegetation and Wildlife There are four preserve areas within the RPUD. Wildlife surveys were completed during the environmental analysis and no nesting Swallowtail Kites were observed. Additional wildlife surveying will be done prior to construction. If any listed species are observed, mitigation will be determined during the permitting process. Proposed Development within Sandy Lane RPUD Additional acreage has been added to the Sandy Lane RPUD, but no changes to the density or residential product have been proposed after the first NIM. At this time, the applicant plans to develop single -story, single family attached and detached dwelling units. The exact size of the units is unknown at this time. The RPUD allows for a maximum height of 35 feet. Multi -family dwelling units are permitted by the RPUD, but there is no intention to develop the property with multifamily units at this time. In the unlikely event that multi -family development is proposed, the required changes to the site plan would likely require an amendment and be subject to the public hearing process. Mr. Asher committed that the eastern portion of the Sandy Lane RPUD, adj acent to Naples Heritage, will only be developed with single-family attached and detached dwelling units. Proposed Amenities All amenities for the Sandy Lane RPUD and Shadov►jwood PUD will be located at the recreation site within the Sandy Lane RPUD as shown on the Master Plan. The applicant anticipates providing the same types of residential amenities that are found in similar communities throughout Collier County. Vegetation Clearing within Naples Heritage This request will not affect existing vegetation within Naples Heritage. The existing powerline easement on the western boundary of Naples Heritage will remain. Residents of Naples Heritage who attended were concerned about tree clearing that had occurred; however, it was determined Page Z of 3 H:\2020\2020028A\WP\PUDz\2nd NIM\NIM Summary (5-13-2022),docx that the trees cleared were adjacent to Taormina RPUD, not the Sandy Lane or Shadowwood projects. Proposed Development within Shadowwood PUD Shadowwwood zoning was previously approved and has existing permits, including vegetation clearing permit for Tract E. If the requested amendment is approved, primary access to Tract E will be to Santa Barbara Blvd. via a connection to the Sandy Lane RPUD, and a secondary access point to Whitaker Rd. The connection to Polly Ave. will be eliminated. Shadowwoo_dL__andscape Buffers ad_�acent to Air Park The developer will install a 6-foot-high wall on top of an �4-foot high berm within the landscape buffer along the eastern boundary of Tract E to buffer the proposed dwelling units from the adjacent air park. There will be a fence within the buffer the to the south. M1S C. Will there be blasting during construction? We do not know at this time. If necessary, blasting will be completed pursuant applicable County standards. Are the proposed lots zero lot line? Not at this time, the minimum lot size proposed is 3,500 square feet. The meeting concluded at approximately 6: 3 0 PM. Page 3 of 3 H:\2020\2020028A1WP\PiJDZ\2nd NIM\NIM Summary (5-13-2022).docx HOLE MONTES ASSOCIATES 1NC 950 ENCORE WAY #200 NAPLES, FL 34110 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN t4 lb PART O #i►• #• Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier Cl" Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has either paid nor promi nsed any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 414/2022 Subscribed and sworn to before on April 4th, 2022 otary, State of nt�i o PUBLICATION COST: �1,008.00 AD NO: GCI0858134 CUSTOMER NO: 530712 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD 3XI0 �IANCY NEYRMAN rotary Public Stake of Wisconsin - :._--- The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Paula N. C. McMichael, A1CP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant at the following time and location: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall - Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104 The following two (2) formal applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management: Sandy Lane RPUD (PL-20200001208). The subject site is approx. 114.56± acres and is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd., approximately one-half mile south of Davis Blvd, in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. The property is currently zoned A -Agricultural. The applicant proposes to rezone the property to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow the construction of 640 dwelling units (single-family and multifamily) for a gross density of 5.59 units/acre. The primary entry into the site is proposed to connect directly to Santa Barbara, with a secondary, resident -only entrance to Country Road. Shadowwood PUDA (PL-20210001253}. The subject site is approx. 168.10± acres, and allows for single and multi -family residential, and a private air park. The applicant owns Tract E of the PUD, totaling approx. 78 acres. The PUD is generally located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Road approximately three quarters of a mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The requested amendment would add an interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD to the north as well as add deviations and additional developer commitments. �ii.�M!{}►tiT��3 heft/..+x.,.r�)�a'ai\..a.tsf.:l�r; Location Map �and� i.ane RPUD? ShadOWWOOO PUD WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and Collier County staff. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NelghborhoodMeetlng@hmeng. corn and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeetingChmeng.com. Please reference Sandy Lane RPUD and Shadowwood PUDA in subject line. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Servicescccc Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 1 fill I Am a�, 1 11 gig,1 i 1 I ***p�eas� be rxdviseol**� The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. if you do not want your a -mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. !' l � � i 1 � i f - �- ,, �. The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your a -mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address � t�" �� t �� r f � „� � �. �` � �� (t � i � i � �} � �, � U cif.? 6�' t .i�i � �C� �...► �j�'� ri �� 3"i � (,_� ��u�i .� � �`l `� �f „� 9 �C � � �, � f'� � y� � ! � � � �! �� C ;'� 8 The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida taw, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip t:MA all Address VO it Fc, ZA co Woof Move . --- HIMME f • / f �• C f dam"'` 3 wed 12 �..D Now r-� "70 N row ilcwo�ole Aj � Vo'.J '/�Fe^/�� ! 1�I{ 3 M ✓ f c�I ♦ r" 1 V c lave 4 \IC4 ***�Gcase be aolv�sed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. if you do not want your a -mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, state Zip E-Mail Address ENGI�;EEr�S • PL.k«IdERS • SURII�YGRS • 950 Encore Way lb Naples, Florida 34110 ® Phone 239.254.2000 ® Fax: 239,254.2099 April 4, 2022 Re: Sandy Lane RPUD (PUDZ-PL20200001208) & Shadowwood PUDA (PL so 20210001253) HM File No. 2020.028A & 2021.015 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, V J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., ice President of Hole Monies, Inc., Robert and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of ColemanYovanovich and Koester. P.A. on behalf of the applicant, have (2) formal applications to Collier County Growth Management: , d thfoll filee owitwo ng Sandy Lane RPUD (PL-20200001208). The subject site is approx. 114.56� acres and is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd., approximately one-half mile south of Davis Blvd, in S ection 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East.. The property is currently zoned A -Agricultural. The applicant proposes to rezone the property to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow the construction of 640 dwelling units (single-family and multifamily) for a gross density of 5.59 units/acre. The primary entry into the site is proposed to connect directly to Santa Barbara, with a secondary, resident -only entrance to Country Road, Shadowwood PUDA (PL-20210001253). The subject site is approx. 168.10� acres, and allows for single and multifamily residential, and a private air park. The applicant owns Tract E of the PUD, totaling approx. 78 acres. The PUD is generally located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive approximately three quarters of a mile east Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, F of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in lorida. The requested amendment would add an interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Sandy Lane RPUD to the north as well as add deviations and additional developer cm omitments. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an oppo�ty to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. at New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall - Room 211, 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34104. If you are unable to attend the meeting the meeting, please email us at Neighb and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of hoo You may also email any comments or questions to Nei reference Sandy Lane RPUD and Shadowwood PUDA Very truly yours, HOLE ®NTES, INC. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President, Plan.n.ing Services PNCM/sek .com and we will send you a link. hborhoodMeetin�( in the subject line. .com. Please Naples � Fort I'�yers I hereby certify that pursuant to %irdinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are VP 1 0 hereby made a part of this Affidavit . (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA C OZTNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this Mtn by means Presid AICP, Vice T of April 2022 physical presence or online notarization, by Paula N. C. McMichael, nt of Hole Montes, Inc., who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. signature of Notary Public Now (Notary Seal) ame of Notary r f�"'•.. STEPHI�NIE iU��OL '; Notnry Public -State of Florid `� Commission �.GG 9b5a34 ., My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 Bonded through National Notary Assn, H:12020\2020028A�wP�I'UDZ12nd TfIMlAffidavit of Compliance (4-7-2022).doc The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Paula N. . McN[ichae(, AIGP, ice President of Hole Mantes, Ind., Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Mantes, inc., and Richard D. -'Yovanovich Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich -and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant at`the following time and location. vVednesday, April 201 2022 1*30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, L®oture Hall -- Room 211, - 7675 Davis Boulevard, Napl6s, FL 34104 The following two (2) formal applications have been made to Colder County Growth Management: ' Sandy Lane RPUDIK- 2020ooa1205}. The, subject site is approx. 114.561: acres and is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd., approximately one-half mile south of Davis Blvd, in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 Fast. The property is currently zoned A -Agricultural., The applicant proposes to Orezone the property.to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow wthe construction of 640 dwelling units (single4amily and rnultifarnily) for a gross density of 15.59 anits/acre. The primary entry into the site 'ts proposed to. connect directly to Santa Barbara',=inrith a secondary, resident -only entrance to Country Raad. Shadowwood PUDA, (PL-2021000112§3). The 'subject site is. approx. 168A 0± acres, to and allows for single and multi -family residential, and a private air park. The applicant awns Tract E of the PUD, totaling approx. 78 acres. The PUD is generally located on the north side of Rattlesnake' Hammock Road approximately three quarters, of a mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South,. Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. 'The requested amendment would add an interconnection from Tract E to the proposed Bandy Lane RPUD to the north as well as add deviations and additional developer commitments. t .Sanhddy,Lane RUD Sandy Lane PUD do L.cii� U . WE VALUE `iCOUR [i�PUT . Business and property owners, residents and visitors are ,welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and Collier County staff. We wIt ill be adhering* to social distancing protocols during the meeting. if you -would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and ,.wo[ Id like `to participate ,.via©om or view a video of the meeting, please email us at 'NeUghborhoodMeeting hrnengE cam and we will send you a linl4. You may also email any cornments or questions to Neighborhood Meetin_a@hmenc .com. % Please . reference Sandy Lane RP D► and Shadowwabd PUDA in subject line. Paula N. C. McMichael AICP Vice President Planningi M1 Services, � Hole Montes, inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phonei 239-254-2000 Z 7685 COLONIAL CT REALTY TRUST 53 FRENCH STREET HINGHAM, MA 02043---0 AMRHElN, CHERYL L D 3969 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2926 BARRY M KLEIN REV TRUST EST 7739 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 BI N NS, TERESA EI LEEN ALLISON JOAN GORNEY 2548 SEYCHELLES DR #805 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BOND, EDWARD ELIOTT CAROL ANNE BOND 2555 SEYCHELLES DR #406 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BOUCHARD, BRUCE & SANDRA o COBBLESTONE LN ANDOVER, MA ' 01810---6308 BUCKLEY JR, ROBIN D & SUSAN 0 6378 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2952 ! f 09L9/095®A.19AV NAP algijPdwoo ww Zgx ww SZluwjojap a11anbi13 09 �9/095®)C1aAV gjim @g1'edwoo «9/9 Z x „� azis laqul . i ALCINE, ELSON i I LIDEJA SAGESSE ; 3381 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112--2942 I 'i ATENCIO, RODOLFO , 4119 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ii I i CALVERT A M0RGAN JR REV TRUST GAYE W MORGAN REV TRUST 2 BRENDLE LN GREENVILLE, DE 19807---0 CASH MAN, DAVI D MATTH EW ROBERTA A CASH MAN 7771 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 CHESSER REVOCABLE TRUST 2855 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---2747 , BETANCOURT, KRISTINA JOHN P OSULLIVAN 38 SILAS WOODS RD MANORVILLE, NY 11949---0 BOISSONNEAULT, BART 215NPINE ST CHARLOTTE, NC 28202---0 BONIFACE, MARISA 85 SADDLE CLUB RD EDGARTOWN, MA 02539---0 BRIEM, JAMES 225 STH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---0 BURR, MARK 2990 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---2714 CARR, LAURA KATHLEEN 4048 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ,I I. I , . CASSITY, BRENDON T & RACHEL i 6069 LUCAYA WAY i NAPLES, FL 34113---0 CHESSER REVOCABLE TRUST ; 2855 SUNSET BLVD I i NAPLES, FL 34112---2747 I I ,I I I' I � ' label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81',60 Dinette de format 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Avery @5160/8160 ALTERNATIVE PROPERTiES LLC 1534 MOCCASIN TRAIL BENTON HARBOR, MI 49022---0 AYCOCK, STEWART CAMPBELL 2555 SEYCHELLES DR #403 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BIG ISLAND DEV OF NAPLES INC 4601 ENTERPRISE AVE SUITE 1 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 - BOLTON, PETER G TRACY L EDMONDSON 3904 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2925 BOTTEICHER, JAMES & LORI 2665 SEYCHELLES CIR #1903 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BRYSON, JENNIFER 3660 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BURRIS, JOHN M & CATHY A 7764 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 CARUSO, ALLYN J & ALYSAN M 873 9TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---0 CHARLES D COLVIN LIVING TRUST .6242 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2952 CH EVA, I RI NA M ELISSA 2555 SEYCHELLES DR #407 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 CHRISTTH�E KING ORTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC 3400 RAD I 0 ROAD UNIT 107 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY' TRANSPORTA-(�10N RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT -OF -WA 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 091,8/091.9®Raany oanE algl��du�oo uau� Lg x uau� 5Z �eu�ao� ap a��anbi�3 09��'3/09l•5®�aan'd u�IM aigl��du�oo «g/5 z x «�. axis �aq�e� i I i CLARK, DENNIS & DIANA � 2665 SEYCH ELLES CI R #1908 i � NAPLES, FL 34112---0 i i i i COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY � 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVES � :. � ; NAPLES, FL 34104---0 i . ' �� ., I;i � _ COLLIER CNTY . i� � TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY � i ' ' 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVES ! NAPLES, FL 34104---0 � ' (i� :i i �. CLARK, GRIFFIN WAYNE HARLEY DEE HERREN 2543 SEYCHELLES DR #606 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT -OF --WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 ;i' 1�. �i COLLIER CNTY i I COLLIER CNTY Y ' � � TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY '. � ( TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY � ° 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVES : � ; 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S i� � NAPLES, FL 34104---0 � I NAPLES, FL 34104---0 �i i i '� (;� ji. '�� COLLIER CNTY i � COLLIER COUNTY � i � ' TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY i i ' 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST � ; ' 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVES ' i � SUITE 101 � NAPLES, FL 34104---0 ; i ' NAPLES, FL 34112---0 � � j I, � i ,I � COLLIER COUNTY ASSOC LLC ; � � COLLIER COUNTY ASSOC LLC � � 5403 W EST G RAY ST i ' S403 W EST G RAY ST ' � �• TAMPA, FL 33609---0 TAMPA, FL 33609---0 i ' . .il ►i .�, �i � '� �i, I�� I �►' _ �' �� ''. COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC , i , COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC i ; 5403 W EST G RAY ST ; i � 54D3 W EST G RAY ST ' � ' TAMPA, FL 33609---0 � � TAMPA, FL 33069---0 I i � � . i� ��i � �i� �ii . �i. �i� �i !�I � _'�. _ COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC � i � COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC ; � •� (' � 5403 W EST G RAY ST 5403 WEST GRAY ST � ' I i. •�. TAMPA. FL 33609---0 � ' TAMPA, FL 33609---0 � i, �i ,i ��: i� ;i �, � �;, :� �i: iii �i, COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC � � � COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC , 5403 WEST GRAY ST ` ; � 5403 WEST GRAY ST ' i , .,, i TAMPA, FL 33609---0 � � � TAMPA, FL 33609---0 , � • 'i' '� .� � .;, i i, � � �. ,� _ ; COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC i COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC ' i 5403 W EST G RAY ST 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 � � TAMPA, FL 33609---0 ! �: , i i . �i � � ,� i � � � i � i ,� � �� label size 1" X 2 5/8" compatible with Avery °5160/81!60 �� ; . ►� � �+;,,'„�++� �� fnrm�� mm v F7 mm r�mnatihio avAr+ ©vArr� ®�iFfl/R9Ff COLLIER COUNTY ASSOC LLC 5403 W EST G RAY ST TAMPA, FL 3360�---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 W G RAY ST TAMPA, FI_ 33609---0 CO LLI E R CO U NTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 W EST G RAY ST TAMPA, FL 3360y---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATE5 LLC 5403 WEST GRAY S7� TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 W EST G RAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 i COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 CURCIO REVOCABLE TRUST 1 HARVEST LANE i KINNELON, NJ 07405---3301 i DALEY, AN N E 4144 SKYWAY DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112-4 DEMPSEY, BARBARA ELIZABETH 2549 SEYCHELLES DR #504 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 DOROTHY L HARRY LIV TRUST 4084 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2924 EBY, DAN A & KAREN L EBY, CLINTON A=& JENNA MARIE 6150 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2966 ESCH, THOMAS J & TAMARA SUE JAMES WARREN ESCH 4138 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2928 09 L8/09 �So AA9AV oaAI? alclil dwoo Lino lg x ww 9Z j*eWjoj op a119nbl13 091�8/09l q@ , JaAV gjim algljudwoo ,,2/q Z x ,j azls laqul i COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 , I . I ' I .I i II ii II i i COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC S403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY STREET TAMPA, FL 33609---0 DAH LE N J R, TIMOTHY DANIELLE M DAHLEN 8 CEDARFIELD LN WESTHAMPTON, NY 11977---0 DECOLA, CAROL A 18 PURITAN DR BEDFORD, NH 03110---0 D E N N E, BETTY M 7752 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2734 I DOUGLAS S BARLETT REV TRUST I I 4109 SKYWAY DR I NAPLES, FL 34112---2922 �I i I� ,i EITEL CO- TR, CHARLES D EITEL. CO� TR, MARY H THE MARY H EITEL REV/LIV/TR UTD 5/20/02 7779 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 ESTEFANO, RODOLFO MA.RIANO CATERINE JIMENEZ 2573 SEYCHELLES DR #107 1 I� i I COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 WEST GRAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 CUCCHI TR, GAIL P R/L/T/D 10-8- 85 54265 BURGUNDY PT SHELBY TOWNSHIP, MI 48316---1508 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 I I . I i I i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible With Avery 05160/81160 G+in�oi-ia rio fnrm�t �F mm v R7 mm rmm�atihlA a�ra� D,��Ani ®�1 Ff11R1 Ff� DALESSAN D RO, DAVI D A CLAUDIA P DALESSANDRO 956 MARBLEHEAD DR NAPLES, FL 34104---0 DELTA GULF LLC 1400 VILLAGE SQUARE BLVD #3 P M B #80012 TA! LAHASSEE, FL 32312---0 DEY, KEVIN & NANCY 3939 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 DUBAY, ELIZABETH ANNE 25SS SEYCHELLES DR #401 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ELLIN JR, ROGER E & KIM 3875 30TH AVENUE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 FAIRCHILD, BRIAN K MARY L FAIRCHILD 800 S. WALNUT ST ROCHESTER, IL 62563---0 09 LO/09 G50Aa9Ab oaAE elglludwoo ww Lg x ww gZ lEwiol ap allanbl13 09L8/09L5®,AaaAV glim algiludwoo ►,9/g Zx,, ozls laqul FALLING WATERS MASTER ASSO INC FALLING WATERS MASTER ASSOC CAMBRIDGE PROPERTY MGT SWFL % CAMBRIDGE PROPERTY MGT SWFL 2335 TAMIAMI TR N., STE 402 2335 TAMIAMI TR N., STE 402 NAPLES, FL 34103--0 NAPLES, FL• 34103aftsompswoo FOGEL FAMILY LIVING TRUST 3963 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2902 GEROY, TODD G & KERRY M 6266 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ► GIORDANO, FRANCIS & MARIA 38 SUMMIT RIDGE I . WATERTOtiMN, CT 06 795---0 GUSTAVUS, MICHAEL J &• LORI R 931 OLIVE CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---0 o ow HACKER Ili, JOSEPH F &. KAREN W 7680 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 r HARRY M LEAGUE JR GEED /TRUST 1701. ROSE HILL DRIVE ARLINGTON HTS, IL 60004---3549 HANUER, BO &wERIKA 8474 DEERVI*EW RD PIEDMONT, SD. S7769---0 I , HERNANDEZ, ANGELJ & RAQUEL 6199 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112--=2967 HIGHLAND PROP.01 LEE & COLLIER 525. 50ILL STREET NA[SLES, FL 341090oft--0 FRANQUIN FAMILY REVOCTRUST 7759 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 GIB�EAULT MAZUR REV TRUST 2573 SEYCHELLES DR #106 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 GONZALEZ, JAIDER 3012 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 341:12---0 GUTIERREZ, JOSE JUDAS ANTONIO AMADO�R VEGA 2542 SEYCHELLES DR #705 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 HAHN, MITCHELL SCOTT SHARON LEE HAHN 17231 RED FOX TRAIL CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44023----0 HARRY M LEAGUE JR DEED/TRUST 1701 ROSE HILL DRIVE ARLINGTON-HTS, IL 60004--�3549 HELMEN III., HARRY WILLIAM 183 SPRING OAKS LN RUCKERSVI LLE, VA 22968---0 i ► i :I i i FEINBERG, ALBERT S & ANDREA M 7775 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 GENOVESE, ROCCO 4024 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2925 GIBISCH, GLEN J 5925 LYMAN AVE DOWNERS4 GROVE, IL 60516---0 GREENWOOD TR, LOUISE N LOUISE N GREEWOOD 1984TRUST 7767 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 GUTZMAN, DANA A & GLORIA 2665 SEYCHELLES CIR #1904 NAPLES, FL 341 12---0 It o HARRISON, SCOTT L DELANA DECKER. HARRISON 7649 S EATON WAY, LITTLETON�, CO 80128---04 HART, STEVEN GEORGE 6251 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 HERNANDEZ, ANGEL NORBERTO HERNANDEZ S2106FLEMING S1to NAPLES; FL' 34113---0 HESS, ERIC i HIGHLAND PROP OF LEE & COLLIER CHRISTINE SCHWETZ all ; J 5.25 SOLL S T REET 2542 SEYCHELLES DR #701 NAPLES; FL 34109---0 NAPLES, FL 341.12:---0 • I it HIPWELL, HOBY E 7 760 NAPLES HERiTAG` DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2734 ► ► I I I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery °5160/8�,60 ttP HP fnrmat 25 rnm x R7 mm rmmnatihlP aver. Avery ®�16f1/816n HJORTAAS, ERIK S SUZANNE HAWKINS 40515KYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 341.12—•--2926 HOFFMAN, DAVID G & DEBRA 47273 AUTU MON PARK CT NOVI, MI ' 48375---0 HUDAK, CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH HUDAK III 4108 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 INDIVERI, VINCENT J & CAROL A 7755 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 JAYNE, MELISSA 6267 WHITAKER *RD NAPLES, OFL 34112---2986 JOAN B WISDOM REV TRUST 7707 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 KEN.NETH F STEENBERG AND ANNE M STEENBERG TRUST 101 FAIRFIELD ROAD HAVERTOWN, PA 19083---0 KNIESPECK, DEE 3919 SKYWAY DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112---0 KULBACKI, WALTER & CATHERINE 7677 COLONIAL COURT NAPLES, FL 34114 2 - 0 LEE, MICHAEL C & DEBORAH A 6120 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 3411.2---2966 LEFFLER, JOHN M & N11CHELLE 2573 SEYCHELLES DR #101 00 NAPLES, FL 34112- 09 �9/09 �5® AJany oaAP alq*ljadwoo ww ,fig x ww 5Z junol ap 91.anb113 09 L8/09 �5® Aj9AV ujim algijPdwoo ,9/9 Z x «� azls laqul i I I HOLDER; STEVEN R 4096 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112- =2924 I I HUDSON, DOUGLAS W I 4072 SKYWAY DR I I NAPLES, FL 34112---0 i I JAMOIE P JANKOWSK10 REV TRUST 2542 SEYCHELLES DR #702 NAPLES, Fl- 34112---0 JEF,FRIES, LOCHLAND D & KELLY A 3952 SKYWAY DR NAPLES; FL 34112--=2925 • JOSEPHINE C ROGAN REV TRUST 7703 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112--2738 KIELBASA, ROBERT SUZANNE R GINOUVES 50 LONG SHORE RD PORTSMOUTH, RI 02871---0 KOSANKE, EDWARD & TERESA 3903 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2902 LAU RA GAY LIVING TRUST 8259 PARKSTONE PL#305 NAPLES, FL 34i.20---0 LEE, MICHAEL C & DEBORAH A 6120 WHITAKER RD ' II , !NAPLES, FL 34112----2966 11 � I' ' i� LEONARD EST, JEFFREY % MARY ANGELIC GANGOY PR I I I THOMAS G LEONARD 7681 COLONIAL CT I, NAPLES, FL 34112---0 I i I � I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 Etio'uette de format 25 mnx 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 HOLMES, ROGER & ANITA 4093 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2922 IACINO, LEEANN WALTER FRANKLIN JO.HNSON 2548 SEYCHELLES DR #803 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 JANE E MARKELL REV TRUST 75 MILLAND DR MILL VALLEY, CA 94941---4910 JENNINGS, ROBERT JOHN JOHANNA JENNINGS 2549 SEYCHELLES#501 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 KASANIC, DONALD G KIMBERLY ANN KASANIC 22045 RIVER RIDGE TRAIL FARMINGTON, MI 48335- 0 KIRKEGAARD, TORI KIRSTIN 2555 SEYCHELLES DR #408 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 KUEHNE, DAVID M & MELISSA A PO BOX 3744 EDGAFT'OWN, MA 02539---0 LAWRENCE REVOCABLE TRUST 7673 COLONIAL CT NAPLES, FL 34112---0 LEE, M]CHAE!. C & DEBORAH A 6120 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2966 LER04YI A TH'OMAS & V!PGIN1A 3965 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 N LESHINGER, GREGORY GIOVANNA DIBENEDETTO 25113 SEYCHELLES DR #608 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 LYTLE, RICHARIac ELAINE MARIE 3892 SKYWAY DR NAPLES; FL 34112---2925 I MARGARET A KUKAWIN.SKI TRUST 52837 KARON DR MACOMB, MI 480642---5643 MCLEAN,LAWRENCE Ai\!DP►EVV MYUNG J00 PARK 2525 COUNTRY CLUB DR TITUSVI LLE, FL 32 7 80---0 MENONNA QUINN, DEMISE EDWARD J QUINN 2549 SEYCHELLES DR #507 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 MUELLER TR, ANN R!1 HERBERTJ MU.ELLERTR. ANN M M.UELLER RESTATED TR 7483 SHAKER RUN LN WEST CHESTER, O,H 45069— 6300 MYRRE, MAP,K FRANCIS MARGARET M LEONE 2543 SEYCHELLES DR #607 NAPLES, FL 3411 2---0 NADHi1/II, RAMIZ CATH T R I N E CAW LEY 2549 SEYCHELLES DR.#508 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 091.9/09 ® A19AV oaAP algljadwoo ww Zq x ww 53 1ewiol ap a11anb113 09 �9/09 L9® RaaAV gpjim algijudwoo «8/5 Z x L azis laqul LEWIS, PHILLIP D & BARBARA G 7726 NAPLES HERITAGE DR i i NAPLES, FL 34112---2734 i I I MADISON, MICHAEL G 2136 LONGBOAT DR I NAPLES, FL 34104---0 II NAPLES HERITAGE CNIN'ITY DEV DIST 210 N UNIVERSITY DR STE 702 CORAL SPR[NGS, F`� 33G71---0 NAPLES HERITAGE CMMTY DEV DIST 210 N UNIVERSITY DR STE 702 CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071---0 � e i i I MCCANN, DENNIS E & JUDITH A , 7723 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 I �I I .I I' MCS LLC 7816TH STREET SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 i I f , MESSURI,MOLLIE BRIDGET 2573 SEYCHELLES DR #104 ' ' .NAPLES., FL 34112---0 I i I ' MURPHY, MORG.AN f 6293 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2987 i MYRTLE ANN ROSE TRUST 479 PEPPERWOOD CT I MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---0 i I I. I NAPLES ASSOCIATES VI LLLP • 1600 SAWGRASSe COR P -PKWY j SUITE 400 I SUNRISE, FI." 333216--0 ' LOUGHLIN, PATRICK & LISA 1975 OLITTLE J 0 H N LANE ALLENTOWN, PA 18103---0 MARASCO, ALFONSO JACQUELI N E A MARASCO 9S371 SKYLANE DR NAPLERVILLE, IL 60564---0 MCFARLAND, DAMES D CAT HERINE M MCFARLAND 7695 NAPLES HERITAGE DRIVE NAPLES, .FL 34112---0 IVIENDEZ; JOi�NATAN P, DENI;SE GAUTREAUX MENDEZ 952 SW 144 PL M I A M I, FL 331 `' 4-----0 IVIOHRBACHER, DALE �� JACC�UELiNE •4025 SKY1A►',4Y DR # ?3 NAPLES, FL* 34112---2926 MYERS TR, ROY D 3874 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 341120- 2920 MYRTLE ANN ROSE TRUST 65 S BARRI•NG1�t�N RD S BAf RINGTON, IL 60010---0 NAP DES CLUB ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATIGN IRIC ASSET RECOVERY GROUP 2520 CORAL WAY #2515 CORAL GABLES, FL 33145-4--0 NAPLES HERITAGE CMMTY DEV DIST 210 !V UNIVERSITY DRSTE 702 • CORAI. SPRINGS, Fl. 3307�.•-0 I I NAPLES HERITAGE CM(�ATY DEV DIST., NAPLES HERITAGE COMPAUNITY 210 N UNIVERSITY DR STE 702 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CORAL SPRINGS, FL 3.3071---7320 i % INFRAMARK LLC 5911 COUNTRY LAKES DR FORT MYERS, FL 33905---0 I + � I i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25.mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 i I' I� l) I _ NAPLES HERI'TAGE'CMMTY DEV DIST 210 N UNIVERSITY DR STE 702 li CORAL SPRINGS, FL' 33071---0 NAPLES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT % I N FRAMARK LLC 5911 COUNTRY LAKES DR FORT MYERS, FL 33905---0 NASH EST, GENEVA 6234 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2966 NEALCOMMUNITIES ON THE BRADEN RIVER LLC 5800 LAKEWOOC RANCH BLVD N SARASOTA, FL 34240----0 NEAL COMMUNIT"IE'S ON THE BRADEN RIVER -LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD N ! SARASOTA, FL 34240---0 i NEAL COMMUNITIES ON THE BRADEN RIVER LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD ,N SARASOTA, FL 34240---0 I PACELLA, JOSEPH A & LAURA A 2549 SEYCHELLES DR #503 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ( i i ' PAPPS, FRANCIS L.& JENNIFER C 3964 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 POZO, GLIVIO ' LAURIE SCHLINDER POZO 1417 CH ESAP EAKE AVE #206 NAPLES; FL 34102---0 i RHODES, ELIZABETH A 3150 P&OLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2753 ROBERI D WHITE TRUST SALLY F VVH ITE TRUST 7 691 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 09 �9/09 ��® wand oaAP aplEdwoo ww Z9 x ww 5Z jewjof op altariblt3 09 L8/09 Lg@ AJOAV ql]M alglludwoo <<8/9 Z x «� azls laqul i I NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB INC 8150 HERITAGE CLUB WAY ! , NAPLES, FL 34112---7703 I i NASTASI, AGOSTINO 2875 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---2747 I; I I I II I NEAL COMMUNITIES ON THE _ BRADEN RIVER LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD N SARASOTA, FL 34240---0 I • I I , NEAL COMMUNITIES ON THE BRADEN RIVER LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD N SARASOTA, FL 34240---0 i I IIII I� III I II I; I OLMSTED, MARK ALAN , DIANE MARIE OLMSTED 2543 SEYCHELLES DR #605 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 PACIOTTi, MARCELO RACHMAN 2542 SEYCHELLES DR #707 II NAPLES, FL 34112---0 I I i i I PAUL ONTHANK & ELIZABETH A. � (i ONTHAN K FAMILY 2021 TRUST , 7727 NAPLES HERITAGE DR I I I i NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ,I� I I, I I; I; j PRICE, JEFFREY ALAN l i i . ' ALLISON MARIE PRICE . i 4519 STI LLWATER CI R i ERIE, PA 16506---0 • I s RILEY, DIANE L 7699 NAPLES HERITAGE DR . _ �dAP LES, FL' ' 34112---7754 BOSS, ROBERT & EVA I . NAPLES LKS COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 NEAL COMMUNITIES UN THE BRADEN RIVER LLC �800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD N SARASOTA, FL • 34240---0 NEALCOMMUNITIESON THE BRADEN RIVER LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD N SARASOTA, FL 34240—�-0 NEAL COMMUNITIES ON THE BRADEN RIVER LLC 58C0 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD N SARASOTA, FL 34240---0 OLSEN, MAUREEN 2542 SEYCHELI—ES DR #t703 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 PAP P, R�N DALL A 9326 S PLEASANT AVE CHIC \GO, IL 60643---0 PEGGY HUGHES RUSLANDER TRUST 7683 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---7754 4C37 SKYWAY DR •' I. 1�IAPLES,.FL 34112----2926 ; ! , I' Ali label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 06160/8160 REBELLO, SHARAL 2573 SEYCHELLES D R #108 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 RIPBERGER, JUDY 7740 NAPLES HERITAGE DP► NAPLES, FL 34112---�0 . SAr✓iMONS, MICHAEL RHONDA HALEY 4036 SKYWAY D R NAPLES, FL 34112---0 SANCHEZ, JUAN & MARLENE C 4165 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2943 SCHWENK, JOHN P• 3976 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 SHAW, KEN N ETH L & BARBARA H 4120 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 341.12---29?4 09 ],9/09 G�® RJaAV oaAP aplEdwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z jpwJaj ap apanbl13 09 [8/09 I.9® AJaAV LIJIM.alglludwoo ,2/9 x ,L azis laqI SANTANA, MAYRA ; . 3411 POLLY AVE I NAPLES, FL 34112---2942 I i i SEYCHELLES 103 LLC 1364 S MASON RD i SAINT LOUIS, MO 63131---0 I I SKYWAY LLC 2004 PORTS 0 CALL DR I 'I.PLANOjTX 75075---0 SOWALSKY, JOHN W & MARGARETA , i SPARACINO, CHRISTOPHER 3927 SKYWAY DR.• j f GALINA SPARACINO NAPLES, FL 34112---29.02 i 6368 ADKINS AVE *STETSON, DAVID B & LISA M 3947 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 T EWMEY, BARBARA A 2548 SEYCHELLES DR #801 NAPLES, FL 3411.2---0 TNT PRICE ST LLC 140EHILOST NAPLES, FL 34113---8663 TRACI G SMITH FAMILY TRUST 150 3RD AVE S #700 NASHVILLE, TN 37201---0 TYLER-BIGGS RESIDENTIAL T RUST 2542 SEYCHELLES DR #708 NAPLES, FL 34112---3018 VICENTE, BEA10RIZ L 2548 SEYCHELLES DR #808 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 �111 Ix ' NAPLES,FL 34112---2952 IIII �►i "li � ` I STETSON, DAViD B & LISA M 3947 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112-•--2902 THOMPSON, GRANVILLE R & JUDY ^ � ! 7722 [MAPLES HERITAGE DR i NAPLES; FL 34112---2734 ,I I I�I . TOM CHRIS•TIAN REV TRUST ! I 3928 SKYWAY DR I ! •I i ,i• it .I i Etiq'uet NAPLES, FL 34112---0' . II !i• I I TRACY HARTMAN DESC*TRUST .I 4045 SKYWAY DR ! ' NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ' . i , TYRONE,.JOSEPH ANDREW ' JESSICA, M TYRONE 30506 CEASAR PARK DR WESLEY CHAPEL, FL 33543---0 , li Viva 11, STANLEY J & JESSICA I 3967 SKYWAY DR = i . I NAPLES, FL 34112----0 I, i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 to de format25 mm x67 mm compatible avecAvery °a16018160 SCHOOLEY, JASON P & LAURIE M 3323 POLLY AVE NAPLES,•FL 34112---0 SHAMAS, MATTH EW M 235 E RIVER DR #903 EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108---0 SMITH, PHILIP G & BERYL C 7693 COLONIAL CT NAPLES, FL 34112---0 STANFORD, SANDRA 2543 SEYCHELLES DR #601 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 SULLIVAN, MICHAELTHOMAS KATHLEEN CONNELLY SULLIVAN 7719 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 THOMPSON, MICHAEL & MARIE PO BOX 185 GOODLAND, FL 34140---185 TOWNSEND, JANICE 2573 SEYCHELLES DR #105 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 TURK; FREED G & JUNE D 7.730 MAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2734 UNA RICKETTS LIVING TRUST 7751 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2738 VRANAS, DONNA 18640 WESTPOINT DR TINLEY PARK, IL 60477---0 WALZ, CHARLES E & LINDA L 2826 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 WHIPPLE, EUGENE BLAIR PHILLIP STILES WHIPPLE 30340 N DARRELL RD MCHENRY, IL 60051---7202 WHITAKER LAND HOLDINGS LLC B&Z ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP 1332QOSW 128TH ST MIAMI, FL 33186---0 • WING SOUTH INC 4130 SKYWAY DR NAPLES; FL 3 4112---2901 09 LS/09 L9® Aj9AV oaAP olgljudwoo ww Zq x Loin qZ jBwjof op att9n1bij3 09,L9/09 [9®/CaaAV ulim elgilb,dwoo <<8/9 Z x j azis laqul WARREN,'RUFFORD & BETTY 0 I 7694 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---7752 { I I ; i I I • I I. WHITAKER LAND HOLDINGS LLC . % B&Z ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP 13320 SW 128TH ST MIAMI, FL 33186---0 WIER.NASZ, JUSTIN J ' CHRISITNE E WIERNASZ 2543 SEYCHELLES DR #603 NAPLES, FL 341127-0 .I ,I .I �I WOODS JR, WI.LLIAM HARCOU�R T DONNA E SIMON 7748 NAPLES HERITAGE DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 . j, I I II. il' 'I I MCDONA,LD, DOUGLAS J& YVONNE I � i: YUKANTAKITWITHYA INC MELBOURNE HOUSE i HANGER SE38 CROWBOROUGH RD i , GLOUCESTER AIRPORT NUTLEY TN22 3HY UNITED KINGDOM i I CHELTENHAM GLS1 6SP ENGLAND II. it il I` East Naples Civic &Commerce, Inc. 8595 Collier Blvd., Suite 107-49 Naples, FL 34114 WASKO, KAREN BARBARA 2543 SEYCHELLES DR #604 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 WHITAKER LAND HOLDINGS LLC B&Z ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP 13320 SW 128TH ST MIAMI, FL 33186---0, WILLIS, PAUL & LAUREN 6184 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 WS16 LLC 8951 BONITA BEACH RD SE BOX 525-300 BONITASPRINGS, FL 34135---0 , Naples Heritage Golf &Country Club Homeowners Association 8762 Naples Heritage Drive Napl es, FL 34112 Seychelles Master Condominium Seychelles � • Condominium Assoc., lnc. I ! Association, Inc. 27180 Ba Landiri Drive Ste. 4 27180 Bay Landing Drive, Ste. 4 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 I I . ij i I I� �I Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Seychelles II Condominium Assoc., lnc. � . � 27180 Bay Landing Drive, Ste. 4 � � � � j Bonita Springs, FL 34135 ' I i I I ► ; • Ili I I I I I I I I I I ; I I i i i I. I I I. l I .I l; { 11i I i I. I I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avecAvery°5160/8160 i lrII r IF McMI*chae ai:< ane nsoj"LJL Norman Trebl*l ole MUAOP�ntes .► is ww + ,{� '� a'.•a 1� i ' iw►i�ii�' ,•'<� if —"'�. .AND , • AAA mifissmont, A AAA A Ofop A It Ife all POW .. w 1- r�lot 7+• • .11i, 1 , — _ � AMP r^ 110 !T_—• Add-�. , �.`rr ,. � LIM-',/ >�. Sand LaneagA, OP: 44 rw y�, 1:11,1;1•.11wffdp_, ANO _ ; �� RPUD ,, 1 be OO — A \4 • .1 •� All it A i AAL A IWAAL 1. 1 OW $ 1. .4 MIND fir IMP '•r • v , .fit -- � • =1± '_-_...op 1 ✓a'� + Ad JAI!MEAN o -. fat , Ir • it r„ f . >,A A A•. Atom • - .� - 1 •` J It +- _ TRACT E AN A �r " •?s •• .. w ....! .. '4+tip- •fir+ ,tat•...— -.—.• . y * — _' � ?N . - •_.may • . 1 flew w .. Is All Owl • ° Z ♦ • �•'�•.67, ham 11 11.-� .'Ir{.�)+ 1M, _^ AOM r, ,r • 1 AA A ..Ott, 7A f A-r- f - II ••• 49 4• IAAYr.Y11 7 As* Ad • •..• y....Ott • • _ _�' I Id to ! ' ti •i./ • •.• •n• i — t ) f • ti •_ Al tr' Air t • • ♦ = If. •AMA 4 Owl I A 1-6 low + ► i IMP raw i 1 • • • .1 '• . 1 • • •'� • • R • r Yirtvwa is • • J Ofty VIA - r•- �. is : MIA_ -'it It low Wood LM m URBAN DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Urban Residential Subdistrict Residential Density Bands Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict COMMERCIAL MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Livingston Road /Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Collier Blvd Community Facility Subdistrict Industrial District Davis -Radio Commercial Subdistrict Conservation Designation OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES — — — Coastal High Hazard Area �• • 1119 nn� ��un�wa nn+w+wA wuw,+ ls. n -� �� I I I 1 � I � I 1 • � • 10'TYPE'A' ZONING: I i 1' LANDSCAPE BUFFER TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD r _ _ J - - R Im „u i , — — — — — -- — — - ---- ----- — — -- - In p PROJECT SUMMARY: I 1 _ R 20 1. K .�.r 1- C.ONCFPTiIAI LAND IISE RRFAKDO'AN. ZONING: AIAINT. E EMENT I, Residential (Tract-R) 41.38 At.+ RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD -� j Lakes (Trae-L) 11.42 Ac.t Preserve Area (Tract-P) 18.60 Ae.d: R Recleatlon Alea (RS) 6.41 A.' m TvxE-A WTYPAPe __ R Open Spgce and Landscape Ba'fers ITB3 Ac.t ._ .. - DUFFER I -- _--- - R '.! Right -of -'!!ay 18.92 Ac.f ! 1• — —_ - - - - - TOTAL 114,66 Act rvPEw IIT TYPE w'y - { R R III n ASSUMES SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE4TIAL DEVELOPMENT. OSCAPLANDSCAPE BUFFER [ - '�1 IF DEVELOPED WITH MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. A FER . ZONING: AGRICULTURAL II 15 TYPE R LANDSCAPE BUFFER WILL BE REQUIRED. Sto.mwater PPM I ZONING: Sine exne.a BlM. P R _R_ _ _ _ �uRESA PE 0 MAXIMUM NUVBER OF DWELLING UNITS = 640 .111CCLTURAL 1 '� B'83.'t`' j 11+ R ( -� - _ -i- ` PRESERVES CAN BE USED TO MEET LDC REQUIRED _ I I I• _ 1 I LtN DSCAPE BUFFER IN ACCOR(M.•NCE WITH DEVELOPER PRIMARY ENTRY _ R +-I R ZONING: R COMMITMENT S.0 P K I R, NAPLES HERITAGE 3. DEVIATIONS: I PreGOLF B COUNTRY CLUB PUD t ,+ II Please see Schedule of Deviatiars. serye t col III, __ I•. - 4. DENSITY' 4 1 ��- 3 - - 5.59 UNIT PER ACRE N 1Ii LANM E•D ZONING: 5. 8'FN SPACE tAND5C.4; PE BUFFER jII AGRICULTURAL 2oTrpEa I -=�'� OPEN SPACE REQUIRED &PROVIDED' 60% - 68.74 Ac i urrvPP.-A � LANDSCAPE -- ; W I III IAN.ICAPF AUFR R R CCNCEPTNAL OPE11 SPACE CALCULATICN - - III FE_ I Fan p— y J �-�: < Land Lean Attaa2. (DrercartnBe) D.{Aerea)-4 to TYPEV' _.. "• - - --. - -.- - 2' I I H.m.mcl (R) at.da 40 1650 ' LANDSCAPE BUFFER —� Lak- (L; 11 42 11 11-12 20 LAKE1 ' _MAIa So NT. USCM£NT I .. n -erl�L 'Itl• 11i51 20 R. mi. rAn . () 1641 140 1256 ! —7 ._... �. I 6,17 A c, ecra re (5) '..� _, } anon Srgtt and L4nd<,Pa Hy"nrA 17 al 100 12.54 I SECONDARY EN71tY 43 R R1shr-ot-war 78.92 15 2.84 - RESILIENT ONLY) F, Fr?.,- III n4 Rn • COIAvlIIrA]IO -- _ - CPEN SPACE ACERAMM ARE CCNC[PNAL ONLY AND ARE SUDECT TO (Ed' CHANCE RASE ON FINAL DE9CN A MBaVUM OF 0.S/811.74 ACRE; + i4Y SHALL EE PR0110E1 { ili R R iZONING! I IIFTYPE A' '-'- - ------ BUFFERt - P 5. NATIvryl7.OTATI.y AGRICULTURAL i DSCAPE _ ..------ _ w REQUIRED 25% of 66.66 Ac. - 16.67 Ac-- R I 3 2.2a Ac. PROVIDED 18.60 AC. I ea voHrowvAv j l R R I FrfkD ZONING: 9.63 P Residential (R) Ac. AGRICULTURAL 3 R a0' Lakes (L) r�Presorva Area (P) Right -Way :'I I 40.0ORAINAOEEASEMENT 311•DDRAINAGE•ACCESS 1 A Interconnectlon' — Recreation Site (Rs) O.R. BOON 109t. PAGE 1108 AND kMINTENNiCE EASEMENT' I i ZONING: IrI OR BOON 5019. PAGE 3187 la TYPET' SHADOW WOOD PUO 1 I -LANDSCAPE I _ Existing Asphalt Road e0.0 ZONING: waNraF2.vAY AGRICULTURAL I = Existing Gravel Road _ I AiIG C2 Il .02, f70 Fn4Fn man.r,n Wa,n °P. EXHIBIT C SANDY LANE RPUD r PI.. (a�1�e�BBD ®� A.iFr°im MASTER PLAN �zozoozB tsar 1 N e. - PUD WAT EttF UFiD r.srarEs RPUD �TJ'rX �URTI 1 n 900 SE:ALk IN FE:(:'I' LEGEND — — ExISTING SIDEWALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 3.05.07.8) PUD DEVIATION v PRESERVE SETBACKS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 15FEEr ACCCSSORYSTRUCTIIAE� 1DFCET Pua PUD HOMES OF 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SFB/+, ISLANDIA U 15' MIN. TYPE "' FOR MF NAPLES 3 . HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB POTENTIAL INTERCONNC-CTION A 10' P.tIN TYPE 'D" BUFFER SUBJECT TO CONDITION 5.2.H. 2324" 1b"" 10' A11N. TYPE 'A' FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B' FOR MF 1 / LANDSCAPE BUFFER SUB.IECT n TO CONDITION 5.9.C. (TBD d 80PNPL( 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FUR SF--� 15' MIN. TYPE "B' FOR hiF A y FL .A fi,DN ST C� 10' MIN TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN, TYPE "B" FOR MF P 0 SHADOWWCFOD SUBDIVISIONS PB vAciE 5HAl70VIWaol3 14 la 19 1 SHADOMMOD VIt1AS 23 FX87 Z REPLAT OF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 9SAm WING S"HAIRPARKExT 61 20•21 SHADOW PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY IP110N ACNEAGE pWELUNG UNITS 1RACTA-RESIDENTIAL 39.61t 194 TRACT E • RESIDE.NTIAt 77.58t 364 TRACT TRAfT R 5, 68t I C•SINGLE•FAMIIY 41.781 RESIDfNT!At LNT iANC' DRIVE in DT TAts 168.1t GROSS DENSITY 3,41UN$T5/ACRE QjSCR PHLS[RVE .i.RACHtStPLHRc a4 REVISIONS 10l28119 REVISED PER ENVIR. STAFF 11/2fi/19 REVISED PER PLANNING STAFF 11l27/19 REV. PEP, LANDSCAPE REVIEW 12/02/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW Ofif11t20 REV, PFR CCBBC 02/18121 REV. PRESERVE AREA DEVIATI n TRACT E —� YPRESERVE V 10 AG. 15' htlN. TYPE'B' BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE'B' BUFFER � 15' htlN, TYPE 'B" BUFFER RMF-6 CFPUD IASIP CONSE }tVATION AREA ti 0 N c.i 10' MIN. T"YPE'A' FOR SF 15' MIN, TYPE "B' FOR MF RSF-4 193 TRACT C RSF-4 IH AtRPAAK V'I�IAS t' a }I NAP TRACT P F' �' PU D COON TRY CLUB I a� P LAKE n TRACT A T� W 20' MIN. TYPE 'D' s BUFFER RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD PUD LE.LY RESORT 950 Encor© Way NDples, FL. 34110 Phone_(239)254-2000 Florida Curtifirato of Authorization No. 1T72 HAGAN ENGINEERING t2S0 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH. STE. 203@ Napbs, Florida 34102 Phorw (239) 851�6239 15' h11N. TYPE "B' BUFFER COLLEGE PARK PUD SHADOWWOOD PUD MASTER PLAN 01/2020 2019-240 As Shown` 1 OF ! ... ��.'; ' :. i ^x '.. :.. -._ _ 41 _ .I ... •. _. ... r,_' . ... �...,�. :�...s "�' i �. - - t. - 'Y > _:ry ''-i'- � �`'l"... i� v i Traffic The Shadowwood PUDA creates no additional transportation impact over what i*s currently approved. The maximum trip generation for the Sandy Lane RPUD shall not exceed 419 two-way, PM peak hour net trips. Table 2A Project Trip Generation — Average Weekday Daily Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Sizells way Volume Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Single -Family Detached 200 du 1 '967 p 37 110 147 1L� 73 198 Housing Multi -Family Housing 440 du 3 286 45 1-',--)o 195 139 82 221 (Low Rise) TOTAL 51253 �2 2�0 �42 264 �.99 419 Note: (1) du = dwelling units . � f ... . jj .. ..- t.. 7;4 _ _.... is .� .r � - , .� -.., , -::•_. ..i: " :'. ,V4, �}'~ c. t '. -, a.__ -.._.- �. t•. td.. .., .[ai. w: ..• .'. •: .. .S l�..�a W 4�, ...4 .�. ,y. �i .f J ..• ) � � .C= Questions?