The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 12/13/2022 Item #16A13 (Wilson Boulevard Widening Project)12/13/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the selection committee's ranking, authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., related to Request for Professional Services ("RPS") No. 22-8006 for "Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening," and direct staff to bring a proposed agreement back for the Board's consideration at a future meeting. OBJECTIVE: To approve the selection committee's ranking of RPS No. 22-8006 and authorize staff to negotiate an agreement to engage professional design services for the Wilson Boulevard Widening project. CONSIDERATIONS: Wilson Boulevard (from Golden Gate Boulevard (CR 876) to Immokalee Road (CR 846)) is currently a two-lane undivided roadway with two -foot -wide shoulders approximately 3.7 miles in length. The proposed project will widen the facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. Proposed typical roadway features will include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path and bike lanes, enhanced bus stops, median and drainage improvements, limited landscaping, and potential lighting. Additional project elements include replacement of the existing bridge over the Cypress Canal, widening or replacement of the bridge box culvert over the Cocohatchee Canal, changes to access along the project corridor, and coordination of utility relocations. The County plans to perform Right -of -Way acquisition along Wilson Boulevard as needed. The retained engineering consultant will use the approved concepts in a planning study completed for the County entitled the "Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study" as the basis for the design, unless otherwise directed by the County. A study of the existing utility well houses west of Wilson Boulevard has been completed for the Collier County Public Utilities Department and is included in the appendix of the Corridor Study. On June 9, 2022, the Procurement Services Division posted RPS No. 22-8006, Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening. The County received three proposals by the July 28, 2022, submission deadline, which were all found to be responsive and responsible. A selection committee met on August 26, 2022, scored the proposals, and shortlisted all three firms to provide presentations. On October 26, 2022, the selection committee convened for presentations and ranked the firms as follows: Firm Names Final Ranking Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1 Kimley Horn and Associates Inc. 2 Atkins North America Inc. 3 Staff is recommending that the Board approve the selection committee's ranking and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top -ranked firm, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a qualified firm that has designed numerous road and bridge projects in Collier County over the past 20 years. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. has recently completed design services for Collier County's Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and has completed the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Planning Study for this project. Their civil engineering/survey subconsultant, Johnson Engineering, is a qualified local engineering firm with extensive experience working on Collier County projects. If staff is unable to reach a proposed agreement with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., staff will continue negotiating with the remaining firms in ranked order, until a proposed agreement can be brought back for the Board's consideration at a future meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item does not result in a direct fiscal impact; however, the source of funding Packet Pg. 698 12/13/2022 for the future contract (subject to board approval at a subsequent meeting) will be Road Impact Fees/ and or Gas Taxes. Approval of this item will not have an impact on operational and maintenance costs; however, the completed project can be expected to have the following operational and maintenance impacts: minimal to no maintenance costs are expected to be incurred within the first five to seven years of service for the new roadway features, and will be absorbed into the regular maintenance schedule thereafter; and the new stormwater features will require minimal maintenance that will be absorbed into the regular maintenance schedule resulting in minimal cost impact. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for Board approval.-SRT GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management impact. RECOMMENDATION: To approve the selection committee's ranking, authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., related to RPS No. 22-8006 for "Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening," and in the event that an agreement cannot be reached with that firm, to continue negotiating with the remaining firms in ranked order, so that a proposed agreement can be brought to the Board for consideration at a future meeting. Prepared by: Dennis F. McCoy, PE, Senior Project Manager, Transportation Engineering Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. [Linked]22-8006 Solicitation (PDF) 2. [Linked]Jacobs Engineering Group Inc Proposal (PDF) 3.22-8006 Final Ranking (PDF) 4.22-8006 NORA fully executed (PDF) Packet Pg. 699 16.A.13 12/13/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.A.13 Doc ID: 23784 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the selection committee's ranking, authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., related to Request for Professional Services ("RPS") No. 22-8006 for "Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening," and direct staff to bring a proposed agreement back for the Board's consideration at a future meeting. Meeting Date: 12/13/2022 Prepared by: Title: Project Manager — Transportation Engineering Name: Dennis McCoy 11/04/2022 8:46 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Transportation Eng — Transportation Engineering Name: Jay Ahmad 11/04/2022 8:46 AM Approved By: Review: Transportation Engineering Marlene Messam Additional Reviewer Completed 11/04/2022 9:02 AM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Transportation Management Services Department Completed 11/04/2022 10:11 AM Procurement Services Ana Reynoso Level 1 Purchasing Gatekeeper Completed 11/04/2022 10:21 AM Procurement Services Sandra Herrera Additional Reviewer Completed 11/08/2022 2:06 PM Transportation Engineering Jay Ahmad Additional Reviewer Completed 11/08/2022 2:20 PM Growth Management Department Lisa Taylor Additional Reviewer Completed 11/09/2022 9:14 AM Growth Management Operations Support Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Completed 11/10/2022 5:48 PM Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Completed 11/14/2022 11:02 AM Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation Completed 11/14/2022 12:13 PM County Attorney's Office Scott Teach Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 11/16/2022 1:20 PM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 11/16/2022 1:45 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 11/16/2022 4:11 PM Office of Management and Budget Christopher Johnson Additional Reviewer Completed 11/28/2022 8:13 AM County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/05/2022 2:56 PM Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 12/13/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 700 16.A.13.c Collier County Procurement Services Division RPS #: 22-8006 Title: Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening Selection Committee Final Ranking Lorraine Dennis Selection Name of Firm Robert Bosch Alicia Abbott Total Committee Final Ranking Tie Lantz McCoy Final Rank Breaker Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. l 1 1 1 4 1.0000 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. 3 31 21 21 10 1 2.0000 1 2 Atkins North America Inc. 1 21 21 31 31 10 1 2.0000 1 3 Procurement Professional Leeann Charles Date 10/26/22 Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 701 DocuSign Envelope ID: 87219FBF-7D28-4604-A1A3-C70002030C14 �.� 16.A.13.d Co�LTer County Procurement Services Division Notice of Recommended Award Solicitation: 22-8006 Title: Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening Due Date and Time: July 28, 2022 at 3:00 PM Respondents: Company Name City County State Final Ranking Responsive/Responsible Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Naples Collier County FL 1 YES/YES Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. Fort Myers Lee County FL 2 YES/YES Atkins North America Inc, Fort Myers Lee County FL 3 YES/YES Utilized Local Vendor Preference: Yes No On June 9, 2022 the Procurement Services Division released notices for Request for Professional Services (RPS) No. 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening. The County notified twenty thousand, three hundred and thirty-eight (20,338) Firms, sixty-nine (69) firms viewed the RPS information, and three (3) proposals were received by the due date of July 28, 2022. All three proposers were found to be responsive and responsible. Per CCNA, Fla. Stat. the evaluation criteria included ability of professional personnel; past performance/ references; project approach, willingness to meet time and budget requirements; and recent, current, and projected workloads of the firm. A minimum of three references were requested from clients of projects with a similar size for which the firm provided services similar in scope and complexity within the past five years. The Selection Committee convened on August 26, 2022 and as described in step 1 of the solicitation documents, the committee scored each of the proposals and shortlisted the top three (3) firms to move to step 2 in the order listed below: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Atkins North America Inc. Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. On October 26, 2022 the Selection Committee reconvened for step 2, presentations and final ranking. The firms were ranked as follows: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ranked as 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. ranked as 2 Atkins North America Inc. ranked as 3 The final ranking resulted in a tie between Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc, and Atkins North America Inc. Pursuant to the Solicitation documents and Collier County Procurement Manual, the tie was resolved. Packet Pg. 702 DocuSign Envelope ID: 87219FBF-7D28-4604-A1A3-C70002030C14 16.A.13.d Staff is recommending negotiations with the top ranked firm, Jacobs Engineering Inc. Contract Driven M Purchase Order Driven 0 Required Signatures Project Manager: ao5i°° Procurement Strategist:'clv� � 10/31/2022 Procurement Services Director: Sandra Herrera 10/31/2022 Date Packet Pg. 703 Coliier County COUNTY MANAGER OPERATIONS Procurement Services Division COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS) In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055 Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act IIle) 0 DESIGN SERVICES FOR WILSON BLVD WIDENING RPS NO.: 22-8006 LEEANN CHARLES, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 TELEPHONE: (239) 252-4270 Leeann.Charleskcolliercountyfl.gov (Email) This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format (rev 8/16/17). Any alterations to this document made by the Consultant may be grounds for rejection of proposal, cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County Government. SOLICITATION PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL 22-8006 SERVICES S NUMBER: PROJECT TITLE: Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening RPS OPENING July 12th 2022 at 3:00pm DAY/DATE/TIME: PLACE OF RPS OPENING: Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2 Naples, FL 34112 All proposals shall be submitted online via the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System: https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/ INTRODUCTION As requested by the Transportation Engineering Division (hereinafter, the "Division"), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Procurement Services Division (hereinafter, "County") has issued this Request for Professional Services (hereinafter, "RPS") with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Consultant, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Specifications or Scope of Work stated. BACKGROUND The purpose of this background is to describe the scope of work and responsibilities of the Design Firm in connection with the preparation of the Request for Professional Services Proposal package for the design and preparation of a complete set of construction plans and special provisions, if necessary, for the proposed corridor widening and improvements identified herein. Wilson Boulevard (from Golden Gate Boulevard ([CR] 876) to Immokalee Road (CR 846) is currently a two-lane undivided roadway with two -foot -wide shoulders approximately 3.7 miles in length. The proposed project will widen the facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. Proposed typical roadway features will include addition of sidewalks, shared -use path and bike lanes, enhancing bus stops, median and drainage improvements, limited landscaping, and potential lighting. Additional project elements include replacement of the existing bridge over the Cypress Canal, widening or replacement of the bridge box culvert over the Cocohatchee Canal, changes to access along the project corridor, and coordination of utility relocations The County plans to perform Right -of -Way (ROW) acquisition along Wilson Boulevard as needed. For reference purposes Vanderbilt Beach Road Design (Roadway, Signing and Pavement, Signals and Lighting) plans are attached. A Planning Study entitled "Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study" has been completed for Collier County. The study is to be used as a reference along with the approved concepts as a basis for the design. A study of the existing well houses west of Wilson Boulevard has been completed for the Collier County Public Utilities Department and is included in the appendix of the Corridor Study. TERM OF CONTRACT County reserves the right to modify this scope during negotiations for budgetary reasons. The contract term, if an award is made, will commence on the date of the Notice to Proceed and end upon acceptance and approval of the final payment. Prices shall remain firm for the initial term of this contract. Surcharges will not be accepted in conjunction with this contract, and such charges should be incorporated into the pricing structure. DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK 1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the COUNTY in connection with the design and preparation of a complete set of construction contract documents and incidental engineering services, as necessary, for improvements to the transportation facility described herein. Major work mix includes: • 0023 Bridge — Replace and Add Lanes • 0032 Bridge Demolition • 0213 Add Lanes & Reconstruct • 1053 Wetland Mitigation / Restoration • 0715 Traffic Engineering Study Major work groups include: • 3.2 Major Highway Design • 4.1.2 Minor Bridge Design Minor work groups include: • 6.1 Traffic Engineering Studies • 6.3.1 ITS Analysis & Design • 7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking & Channelization • 7.2 Lighting • 7.3 Signalization • 8.1 Control Surveying • 8.2 Design, Right of Way Construction Surveying • 8.4 Right of Way Mapping • 9.1 Soil Exploration • 9.2 Geotechnical Classification Lab Testing • 9.3 Highway Materials Testing • 9.4 Foundation Studies 0 9.5 Geotechnical Specialty Lab Testing • 15.0 Landscape Architect. The Firms submitting as the PRIME CONSULTANT at a minimum must be pre -qualified through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in the following work groups: • Group 3 - Highway Design — Roadway: 3.2 Major Highway Design. Also, at a minimum, the PRIME CONSULTANT or its SUBCONSULTANT(s) must be pre - qualified through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in the following work groups: • Group 4 - Highway Design — Bridges: 4.1.2 Minor Bridge Design • Group 6 — Traffic Engineering Studies • Group 7 — Traffic Operations Design • Group 8 — Surveying and Mapping • Group 9 — Soil Exploration, Material Testing, and Foundations • Group 15 — Landscape Architect. Known alternative construction contracting methods include: N/A. The general objective is for the CONSULTANT to prepare a set of contract documents, including plans, specifications, supporting engineering analysis, calculations, and other technical documents in accordance with FDOT and COUNTY policy, procedures, and requirements. These Contract documents will be used by the contractor to build the project and test the project components. These Contract documents will be used by the COUNTY or its Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) representatives for inspection and final acceptance of the project. The CONSULTANT shall follow a system engineering process to ensure that all required project components are included in the development of the Contract Documents and the project can be built as designed and to specifications. The Scope of Services establishes which items of work in the FDOT 2018 Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance (FloridaGreenbook), 2022 FDOT Design Manual (FDM), Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) (updated September 7,2021) and other pertinent manuals are specifically prescribed to accomplish the work included in this contract and also indicate which items of work will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT and/or the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be aware that certain modifications and/or improvements to the original concepts may be required as a project is developed. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate these refinements into the design and consider such refinements to be an anticipated and integral part of the work. These changes shall not be a basis for any supplemental fee request(s). The CONSULTANT shall demonstrate good project management practices while working on this project. These include communication with the COUNTY and others as necessary, management of time and resources, and documentation. The CONSULTANT shall set up and maintain a contract file in accordance with COUNTY procedures throughout the design of the project. The CONSULTANT is expected to know the laws and rules governing their professions and is expected to provide services in accordance with current regulations, codes and ordinances, and recognized standards applicable to such professional services. The CONSULTANT shall provide qualified technical and professional personnel to perform to COUNTY standards and procedures the duties and responsibilities assigned under the terms of this agreement. The CONSULTANT shall minimize the COUNTY's need to apply its own resources to assignments authorized by the COUNTY to the maximum extent. The COUNTY will provide contract administration, management services, and technical reviews of all work associated with developing and preparing contract documents, including Construction documents. The COUNTY's technical reviews are for high-level conformance and are not meant to be comprehensive reviews. The CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for all work performed and work products developed under this Scope of Services. The COUNTY may provide job -specific information and/or functions as outlined in this contract, if favorable. It is imperative that all signal, roadway lighting, signing, and pavement marking designs be reviewed and approved by Collier County Traffic Operations at each project phase. Additionally, the designer shall adhere to the latest Collier County Traffic Operations specifications to minimize redesign. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The CONSULTANT shall investigate the status of the project and become familiar with concepts and commitments (typical sections, alignments, etc.) developed from prior studies and/or activities. A Planning Study entitled "Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study" has been completed by Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. for Collier County. The CONSULTANT shall use the approved concepts as a basis for the design unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY. In addition, Jacobs Engineering Group prepared a Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment report of the existing well houses and raw water main located west of Wilson Boulevard for the Collier County Public Utilities Engineering and Project Management Division (EPMD). It is included in the appendix of the Corridor Study (Appendix H Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum). Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard (CR876) and Immokalee Road (CR 846) is a two-lane undivided roadway with two -foot -wide shoulders. The segment length is approximately 3.7 miles. The project proposes urbanizing this Wilson Boulevard segment to a four -lane divided roadway. The proposed typical roadway features will include curbing and gutters, sidewalks, a shared -use path, on -street bike lanes, bus stop enhancements, medians, drainage improvements, limited landscaping, and corridor or intersection lighting. Additional project elements include replacing the existing bridge over the Cypress Canal, widening or replacing the existing bridge box culvert over the Cocohatchee Canal, access management changes along the project corridor, and coordinating utility relocations. Also, the project will require Right -of -Way (ROW) acquisition to incorporate the proposed improvements. 2.1 Project General and Roadway (Activities 3, 4, and 5) Public Involvement: See Public Involvement Scope, Section 3.1 Other Agency Presentations/Meetings: See Public Involvement Scope, Section 3.1 Joint Project Agreements: N/A. Specification Package Preparation: See Specifications Package Preparation, Section 3.3 Value Engineering: An independent CONSULTANT will conduct Value Engineering/Independent Peer Review services for this project. Please review Section 3.5 for details. Risk Assessment Workshop: N/A. Plan Type: Plan/Profile. The CONSULTANT shall provide all plans and details necessary for the project's construction described herein. The CONSULTANT is expected to follow all design criteria and processes provided in the 2018 FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance (commonly known as the Florida Greenbook). Additional criteria from the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way Collier County, Florida, and the Collier County Urban Land Development Code (CCULDC) should also be utilized. In addition, the FDOT Design Manual (FDM) criteria and the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide should be considered for best practice. The COUNTY must approve deviations from the criteria and processes provided in the FDM in writing. Typical Section: The CONSULTANT shall develop and submit a signed and sealed Typical Section Package. The design controls and criteria will be based on the Corridor Study Report adopted on January 25, 2022. Any deviations from these criteria must be approved in writing by the COUNTY. Pavement Design: The CONSULTANT shall provide all pavement designs required for the project. The CONSULTANT shall submit a signed and sealed Pavement Design Package for COUNTY approval before the 30% plan submittal. Pavement Type Selection Report(s): N/A. Cross Slope: The CONSULTANT shall evaluate any necessary modifications to cross slopes of existing pavement to be retained as part of this project. Access Management Classification: The CONSULTANT shall review the proposed access management changes in the Corridor Study adopted on January 25, 2022, and ensure that these changes meet best access management practices. Any deviations from the Collier County 2013 Resolution 13-257 Table 1 applied to the project shall be coordinated with the COUNTY's Project Manager for review and approval. Transit Route Features: Three Collier Area Transit (CAT) routes use this Wilson Boulevard segment; CAT Route 19 from Golden Gate Estates to Immokalee, CAT route 22 (Immokalee Circulator), and CAT Route 28 Golden Gate Estates from Oil Well to Immokalee. Therefore, there are six existing transit bus stops and one Collier County Public Schools (CCPS) bus stop within the project limits. The CONSULTANT must coordinate with Collier County Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancements (PTNE) as the project will impact transit operations and locations. Major Intersections/Interchanges: o Golden Gate Blvd (CR876) o Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR862) and, o Immokalee Road (CR 846). Minor Intersections: o 10th Ave. NW/loth Ave. NE o 12th Ave NW/12th Ave NE o 14th Ave NW/14th Ave NE o 16th Ave NW/ 16th Ave NE o Jung Blvd. W/Jung Blvd E o 18th Ave NW/18th Ave NE o 20th Ave NW/20th Ave NE o 22nd Ave NW/22nd Ave NE o 24th Ave NW/24th Ave NE Roadway Alternative Analysis: N/A. Level of TTCP: The CONSULTANT shall provide Temporary Traffic Control Plans as required. Special considerations shall be given to the surrounding residents and business access points. It is anticipated that the project will require Level II Plans. Temporary Lighting: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary lighting designs necessary for the project (when/if required). Temporary Signals: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary signal designs necessary for the project (when/if required). Temporary Drainage: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary drainage designs necessary for the project (when/if required). Design Variations/Exceptions: Not anticipated Back of Sidewalk Profiles: CONSULTANT shall perform all engineering analysis for the project, even if it is not included in the delivered plans. Selective Clearing and Grubbing (approximately 15 acres): CONSULTANT will provide the initial assessment, inventory, and disposition of the existing vegetation impacted by the proposed roadway improvements so that the limits of the clearing and grubbing can be determined. Landscaping: CONSULTANT will design irrigation and electrical conduit locations per direction from Collier Count Landscape Department. In addition, any special landscape Median Fill will be specified per direction from Collier County Landscape Department. 2.2 Drainage (Activities 6a and 6b) System Type: The stormwater system will be designed to meet the permitting requirements of all permitting agencies. Stormwater system design will consider best management practices. For this project, it is expected that stormwater management may utilize a closed system, lateral ditches, ponds, etc., or a combination of all. Floodplain compensation may be part of the solution within or outside the existing right-of-way. The design/coordination of all off -site ponds is part of this Scope of Services. 2.3 Utilities Coordination (Activity 7) The CONSULTANT is responsible for certifying that all necessary arrangements for utility work on this project have been made and will not conflict with the physical construction schedule. In addition, the CONSULTANT should coordinate with COUNTY personnel to coordinate transmittals to Utility Companies and meet production schedules. The CONSULTANT shall ensure FDOT standards, policies, procedures, practices, and design criteria are followed concerning utility coordination. The CONSULTANT may employ more than one individual or utility engineering consultant to provide utility coordination and engineering design expertise. The CONSULTANT shall identify a dedicated person responsible for managing all utility coordination activities. This person shall be contractually referred to as the Utility Coordination Manager and shall be identified in the CONSULTANT proposal. The Utility Coordination Manager shall be required to satisfactorily demonstrate to the COUNTY's Project Manager that they have the following knowledge, skills, and expertise: ■ A minimum of 4 years of experience performing utility coordination in accordance with FDOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards, policies, and procedures. ■ A thorough knowledge of the FDOT plans production and District utility coordination processes. ■ A thorough knowledge of FDOT agreements, standards, policies, and procedures. The Utility Coordination Manager shall be responsible for managing all utility coordination, including the following: ■ Assuring that Utility Coordination and accommodation are in accordance with the COUNTY, FDOT, FHWA, and AASHTO standards, policies, procedures, and design criteria. ■ Assisting the Engineer of Record (EOR) in identifying all existing utilities and coordinating any new installations. Assisting the FOR with resolving utility conflicts. ■ Scheduling and performing utility coordination meetings, keeping and distributing minutes/action items of all utility meetings, and ensuring expedient follow-up on all unresolved issues. ■ Distributing all plans, conflict matrixes, and changes to affected utility owners and ensuring this information is properly coordinated and documented. ■ Identify and coordinate the completion of any COUNTY or utility owner agreement required for reimbursement or accommodation of the utility facilities associated with the project. ■ Review and certify to the COUNTY Project Manager that all Utility Work Schedules are correct and in accordance with the COUNTY's standards, policies, and procedures. ■ Prepare, review, and process all utility -related reimbursable paperwork, including betterment and salvage determination. The CONSULTANT's utility coordination work shall be performed and directed by the Utility Coordination Manager identified and approved by COUNTY's Project Manager. Any proposed change of the approved Utility Coordination Manager shall be subject to review and approval by COUNTY's Project Manager prior to making any change in this contract. Anticipated utilities include: 0 Florida Power and Light • Century Link/Lumen • Summit Broadband, Inc. • TECO Peoples Gas • City of Naples Water • City of Naples Utilities • Collier County -Road Maintenance • Collier County PUD • Collier County IT • Collier County Traffic Operations Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD) is completing a separate design that will relocate the existing raw water main from its existing location adjacent to Wilson Blvd and place the raw water main approximately five (5) feet inside the new westerly right of way. Further, additional improvements to the existing well house/vault piping will need to be completed to connect to the relocated raw water main along with electrical conduit & conductor improvements. CCWSD may also include in this utility design, installing a new force main on the east side of Wilson Blvd from Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard. It is the County's intension to incorporate the utility construction plans and bidding documents with the roadway widening construction plans and bidding documents at the time of bidding the project. Requests by Collier County Utilities for utility design upgrades of pipelines such as the additional or increased capacity of water, sanitary sewer, reclaimed water is not part of this scope and will be considered Additional Services. 2.4 Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances (Activity 8) The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with all appropriate regulatory agencies to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: Individual Environmental Resource Permit (SFWMD) National Discharge Pollutant Elimination System General Permit (FDEP) Section 404 Individual Permit (FDEP) The CONSULTANT is responsible for the identifying and applying for all necessary permits for the project. The CONSULTANT is responsible for all permit coordination and revisions necessary to obtain the required permits. The CONSULTANT shall obtain COUNTY review of the plans and application before submitting to the permitting agencies and assist the COUNTY in developing the permitting strategy for the project. All application and processing fees associated with permitting activities shall be paid for by the COUNTY directly to each applicable agency. The COUNTY will direct use of mitigation banks as required. 2.5 Structures (Activities 9 — 18) Bridge(s): 034032- Proposed replacement bridge over Cypress Canal: 120 ft. length by 100 ft. width, four, 11-ft travel lanes, 22-ft wide median, 6.5' bike lanes each side, 10-ft shared use pathway, 6-ft sidewalk. 034056- Bridge Box Culvert over the Cocohatchee Canal north of Immokalee Road is to be widened or replaced. Type of Bridge Structure Work: BDR Short Span Concrete Medium Span Concrete Retaining Walls: N/A. Noise Barrier Walls: N/A. Miscellaneous: Mast Arm signalization structures (as needed) and special lighting foundations (optional, if required), 2.6 Signing and Pavement Markings (Activities 19 & 20) The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for all signing and pavement markings required for the project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY's Traffic Operations Section to maintain COUNTY's sign asset database integrity. Contractor to follow Traffic Operations Signing and Pavement Markings special provision details, including using a 2.5" x 2.5" galvanized metal square tubular signpost. 2.7 Signalization (Activities 21 & 22) Intersections: Existing Signalized Intersections: Golden Gate Blvd (CR876), Immokalee Road (CR846), and Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR862). Traffic Data Collection: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY's Transportation Planning and Traffic Operations sections to see if existing traffic volume counts are available for Wilson Blvd from Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Road. Traffic Studies: The CONSULTANT shall perform a traffic study at the intersections of Golden Gate Blvd, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Immokalee Road. The purpose of the traffic study is to provide the intersection configuration needed for proper operations for the projected traffic volumes. Count Stations: Two count stations. (Between Golden Gate Blvd. and VBR, and between VBR and Immokalee Road) Traffic Monitoring Sites: TBD. 2.8 Lighting (Activities 23 & 24) The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for all lighting required for the project. The CONSULTANT will analyze the luminescence needs for the project and provide recommendations for street lighting compatible with a four -lane configuration for Wilson Blvd. Services include providing a lighting justification report and a lighting design analysis report (as required). 2.9 Landscape (Activities 25 & 26) Landscape Irrigation or Planting Plans is NOT included as part of this Project. The level of Landscaping required includes proposed conduits and sleeves for future landscaping areas and adding architectural pavers in designated medians locations. The CONSULTANT shall provide adequate landscape topsoil within the medians for future COUNTY use and "Base Level of Landscaping" per Collier County Landscape Beautification Master Plan. Outdoor Advertising: N/A 2.10 Survey (Activity 27) Design Survey: All survey is required for this project, including a detailed topographic and control survey covering the project limits from south of Golden Gate Blvd to the north of Immokalee Road, including all access points within Collier County existing ROW. Boring Layout: Boring locations will be provided for proposed mast arms along Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Blvd., and VBR and the proposed bridge/culvert foundations. Subsurface Utility Exploration: Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) per the American Society of Civil Engineers accepted guidelines for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data using Quality Level "A" at any proposed mast arm foundations in an area two (2) times the proposed drilled shaft diameter prior to the final design. Additional SUE locations TBD at the bridge #034032 location and proposed lighting & drainage locations. A quantity of 50 underground locates (Vvh's) is anticipated for this project and is included in this Scope of Services. Right of Way Survey: All Right of Way survey is required for this project from Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Road. Vegetation Survey: The design plans will identify mature trees and palms greater than 4" diameter at breast height within the construction limits. Where existing trees are in groups, they will not be individually designated but shown as a group. 2.11 Photogrammetry (Activity 28) - NA In accordance with FDOT Photogrammetry Handbook and adequate coverage to provide data as defined below in Section 2.12 Mapping. 2.12 Mapping (Activity 29) Control Survey Map: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Control Survey Maps necessary for the project. Right of Way Map: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Right of Way Maps and Technical Memorandums for the right of way acquisitions necessary for the project. Boundary Surveys for right-of-way acquisition. Legal Descriptions: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Legal Descriptions necessary for the project. Maintenance Map: N/A Miscellaneous Items: N/A 2.13 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR (Activity 30) — N/A. 2.14 Architecture (Activity 31) — N/A. 2.15 Noise Barriers (Activity 32) N/A(see also 18.20 to 18.26) 2.16 Intelligent Transportation Systems (Activities 33 & 34) — As requested. 2.17 Geotechnical (Activity 35) The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all necessary geotechnical activities associated with/required for this project. Types of boring anticipated include roadway, structures, storm pipe, ponds, lighting, and signals. 2.18 3D Modeling (Activity 36)- N/A. 2.19 Project Schedule The anticipated design schedule for the project is 550 calendar days from the date of Notice to Proceed (NTP). The targeted total contract schedule is 1,520 calendar days from the issuance of the NTP. This will consist of a design phase (550 days), a bid phase (180 days) and a post design phase (790 days). A separate NTP will be issued for the post design services phase. Within ten (10) days after the NTP is issued, and prior to the CONSULTANT beginning work, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed project activity/event schedule in Microsoft Project for COUNTY and CONSULTANT to meet the completion date for design. The schedule shall indicate each milestone activity/event that is included in the scope of work and, at a minimum, submission dates for 30% plans, 60% plans, 90% plans, Final plan, and SFWMD submittal packages. In addition, the schedule shall allow for a minimum of 21 calendar days for COUNTY reviews of the 30% plans, 60% plans, 90% plans, and Final plans. All fees and price proposals are to be based on a contract schedule of 1520 days for final construction contract documents and post -design services. In no event shall the contract deadline exceed 1520 calendar days from the date of initial Notice to Proceed. Periodically, throughout the life of the contract, the project schedule shall be reviewed and, with the COUNTY's approval, adjusted as necessary to incorporate changes in the Scope of Services and progress to date. The approved schedule and schedule status report and progress shall be submitted with the monthly progress report and invoice. 2.20 Submittals The CONSULTANT shall furnish construction contract documents as required by the COUNTY to control adequately control, coordinate adequately, and approve the work concepts. The COUNTY prefers to use the Bluebeam Revu software platform to expedite the design reviews. The CONSULTANT shall set up studio project collaboration sessions in Bluebeam at each phase submittal if the CONSULTANT is accustomed to and uses this platform. The CONSULTANT shall manage the marked -up documents so that comments can be tracked and are easily organized for hard copy printouts. If the CONSULTANT does not use Bluebeam, a File Transfer server should be used to submit deliverables in Adobe PDF format. Documents that do not exceed 25 MGB can be transmitted via email. All submitted documents shall be digitally signed and sealed in accordance with applicable Florida Statutes. All documents shall be developed and submitted in accordance with the edition of the Greenbook/FDM effective at issuance of the Notice to Proceed unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY in writing. Each submittal shall include one (1) digital copy of all documents required for the submittal as defined herein. Method of delivery must be preapproved by the COUNTY. In addition to the delivery of the files produced during the course of project development, the COUNTY requires the inclusion of Engineering Data files (prepared by or for the CONSULTANT) for critical geometrics in the design. These can include the alignments, profiles, cross sections, surfaces, etcetera. Critical roadway geometric items, such as the centerlines and profiles of the proposed mainline, side streets, special ditches, and utilities, must be included. These Engineering Data files are considered "Project Documents" as defined in the contract and shall be provided when requested by the COUNTY. All Engineering Data files shall be compatible with the Bentley MicroStation platform. Drawings files shall be provided in most current versions of a fully functional MicroStation V8i (.dgn) and plotted to an Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format to facilitate review and digital delivery. In addition, specifications shall be provided in pdf. The comment and review process for all deliverables for this Contract shall utilize Bluebeam Studio Sessions. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for setup Bluebeam Session for soliciting COUNTY's comments on each submittal. The CONSULTANT's Bluebeam setup shall include comment tracking and response mechanism. The CONSULTANT shall provide Session access to COUNTY's staff (and other independent Consultants) as identified by COUNTY's Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall respond to each comment until comment is placed marked with a "CLOSED" status by the Reviewer. The CONSULTANT shall maintain copies of all Session files and submit them to COUNTY as supplementary files to the Final Deliverable. Use of Bluebeam Sessions for submittal reviews (including setup, upload, and maintain comment records) is considered as part of the design approval process; subsequently, no separate payment shall be made for Bluebeam Sessions. The CONSULTANT shall furnish one draft and one final copy of each report, including cost estimates in size 8.5" x 11 ". The final reports shall be signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record, a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Florida. Each engineering plan sheet shall be size 11" x 17". After the 90% phase comments are resolved, the CONSULTANT shall furnish a camera-ready set of plans, specifications, and the bid schedule to the COUNTY for bidding. All engineering data necessary to recreate proposed surface models includes horizontal and vertical alignments, terrain models, roadway corridors, templates, and superelevation definitions. All Microstation resource files necessary to reproduce drawing files include linestyles, color tables, fonts, cell libraries, pen tables, etc. 2.21 Provisions for Work All work shall be prepared with English units in accordance with the latest editions of standards and requirements utilized by the COUNTY, which include, but are not limited to, publications such as: General Title 29, Part 1910, Standard 1910.1001, Code of Federal Regulations (29 C.F.R. 1910.1001) — Asbestos Standard for Industry, U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 C.F.R. 1926.1101 — Asbestos Standard for Construction, OSHA 40 C.F.R. 61, Subpart M - National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart E — Asbestos -Containing Materials in Schools, EPA 40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart G — Asbestos Worker Protection, EPA Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards for Accessible Design AASHTO — A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System AASHTO — Roadside Design Guide AASHTO — Roadway Lighting Design Guide AASHTO — A Policy for Geometric Design of Highways and Streets AASHTO — Highway Safety Manual Rule Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), Standards of Practice for Professional Surveyors and Mappers Chapter 469, Florida Statutes (F.S.) — Asbestos Abatement Rule Chapter 62-257, F.A.C., Asbestos Program Rule Chapter 62-302, F.A.C., Surface Water Quality Standards Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.) Chapters 20, 120, 215, 455, Florida Statutes (F.S.) — Florida COUNTY of Business & Professional Regulations Rules Florida COUNTY of Environmental Protection Rules FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual FDOT Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) Manual FDOT Standard Plans FDOT Flexible Pavement Design Manual FDOT - Florida Roundabout Guide FDOT Handbook for Preparation of Specifications Package FDOT Standard Plans Instructions FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways ("Florida Greenbook") FDOT Materials Manual FDOT Pavement Type Selection Manual FDOT Design Manual FDOT Procedures and Policies FDOT Procurement Procedure 001-375-030, Compensation for CONSULTANT Travel Time on Professional Services Agreements FDOT Project Development and EnvironmentManual FDOT Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook FDOT Public Involvement Handbook FDOT Rigid Pavement Design Manual FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction FDOT Utility Accommodation Manual Manual on Speed Zoning for Highways, Roads, and Streets in Florida Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) - Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) FHWA — National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672, Roundabouts: An Informational Guide FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) and Guideline Handbook Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Standard Manatee Construction Conditions 2005 Florida Statutes (F.S.) Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning Model Guide Specifications — Asbestos Abatement and Management in Buildings, National Institute for Building Sciences (NIBS) Quality Assurance Guidelines Safety Standards Any special instructions from the COUNTY Roadway FDOT — Florida Intersection Design Guide FDOT - Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook FDOT - Quality/Level of Service Handbook Florida's Level of Service Standards and Highway Capacity Analysis for the SHS Transportation Research Board (TRB) - Highway Capacity Manual Permits Chapter 373, F.S. — Water Resources US Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Programs Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Protected Wildlife Permits Bridge Permit Application Guide, COMDTPUB P16591.3C Building Permit Drainage FDOT Bridge Hydraulics Handbook FDOT Culvert Handbook FDOT Drainage Manual FDOT Erosion and Sediment Control Manual FDOT Exfiltration Handbook FDOT Hydrology Handbook FDOT Open Channel Handbook FDOT Optional Pipe Materials Handbook FDOT Storm Drain Handbook FDOT Stormwater Management Facility Handbook FDOT Temporary Drainage Handbook FDOT Drainage Connection Permit Handbook FDOT Bridge Scour Manual Survey and Mapping All applicable Florida Statutes and Administrative Codes Applicable Rules, Guidelines Codes and authorities of other Municipal, COUNTY, State and Federal Agencies. FDOT Aerial Surveying Standards for Transportation Projects Topic 550-020-002 FDOT Right of Way Mapping Handbook FDOT Surveying Procedure Topic 550-030-101 Florida COUNTY of Transportation Right of Way Procedures Manual Florida COUNTY of Transportation Surveying Handbook Right of Way Mapping Procedure 550-030-015 Traffic Engineering and Operations and ITS AASHTO - An Information Guide for Highway Lighting AASHTO - Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities FHWA Standard Highway Signs Manual FDOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) FDOT Median Handbook FDOT Traffic Engineering Manual National Electric Safety Code National Electrical Code Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Florida's Turnpike Plans Preparation and Practices Handbook (TPPPH) Florida's Turnpike Lane Closure Policy Florida's Turnpike Drainage Manual Supplement Rigid Pavement Design Guide for Toll Locations with Electronic Toll Collection Flexible Pavement Design Guide for Toll Locations with Electronic Toll Collection Florida's Turnpike General Tolling Requirements (GTR) Additional Florida's Turnpike Enterprise standards, guides, and policies for design and construction can be found on the FTE Design Website: http://design.floridastumDike.com Traffic Monitoring American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Manual of Steel Construction, referred to as "AISC Specifications" American National Standards Institute (ANSI) RP-8-00 Recommended Practice for Roadway Lighting AASHTO AWS D1.1/ANSI Structural Welding Code — Steel AASHTO D1.5/AWS D1.5 Bridge Welding Code FHWA Traffic Detector Handbook FDOT General Interest Roadway Data Procedure FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide FDOT's Traffic/Polling Equipment Procedures Structures AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications and Interims AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications and Interims AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals, and Interims. AASHT0/-AWS-D1. 5M/D1.5: An American National Standard Bridge Welding Code AASHTO Guide Specifications for Structural Design of Sound Barriers AASHTO Manual for Condition Evaluation and Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) of Highway Bridges FDOT Bridge Load Rating Manual FDOT Structures Manual FDOT Structures Design Bulletins (available on FDOT Structures web site only) Geotechnical FHWA Checklist and Guidelines for Review of Geotechnical Reports and Preliminary Specifications Manual of Florida Sampling and Testing Methods Soils and Foundation Handbook Landscape Architecture Florida COUNTY of Agriculture and Consumer Services Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants Architectural Building Codes Florida Building Code: Building Fuel Gas Mechanical Plumbing Existing Building Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Rule Chapter 60D, F.A.C., Division of Building Construction Chapter 553, F.S. — Building Construction Standards ANSI Al 17.1 2003 Accessible and Usable Building and Facilities Titles II and III, Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), Public Law 101-336; and the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) Architectural — Fire Codes and Rules National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) - Life Safety Code NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code NFPA 10 - Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers NFPA 11 - Standard for Low -Expansion Foam Systems NFPA I IA - Standard for High- and Medium -Expansion Foam Systems NFPA 12 - Standard for Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems NFPA 13 - Installation of Sprinkler Systems NFPA 30 - Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code NFPA 54 - National Gas Fuel Code NFPA 58 - LP -Gas Code Florida Fire Prevention Code as adopted by the State Fire Marshal — Consult with the Florida State Fire Marshal's office for other frequently used codes. Architectural — Extinguishing Systems NFPA 10 - Fire Extinguishers NFPA 13 - Sprinkler NFPA 14 - Standpipe and Hose System NFPA 17 - Dry Chemical NFPA 20 - Centrifugal Fire Pump NFPA 24 - Private Fire Service Mains NFPA 200 - Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems Architectural — Detection and Fire Alarm Systems NFPA 70 - Electrical Code NFPA 72 - Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Local Protective Signaling Systems NFPA 72E - Automatic Fire Detectors NFPA 72G - Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Notification Appliances NFPA 72H -Testing Procedures for Remote Station and Proprietary Systems NFPA 74 - Household Fire Warning Equipment NFPA 75 - Protection of Electronic Computer Equipment Architectural — Mechanical Systems NFPA 90A - Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems NFPA 92A - Smoke Control Systems NFPA 96 - Removal of Smoke and Grease -Laden Vapors from Commercial Cooking Equipment NFPA 204M - Smoke and Heating Venting Architectural — Miscellaneous Systems NFPA 45 - Laboratories Using Chemicals NFPA 80 - Fire Doors and Windows NFPA 88A - Parking Structures NFPA 105- Smoke and Draft -control Door Assemblies NFPA 110 - Emergency and Standby Power Systems NFPA 220 - Types of Building Construction NFPA 241 - Safeguard Construction, Alteration, and Operations Rule Chapter 69A-47, F.A.C., Uniform Fire Safety For Elevators Rule Chapter 69A-51, F.A.C., Boiler Safety Architectural — Energy Conservation Rule Chapter 60D-4, F.A.C., Rules For Construction and Leasing of State Buildings To Insure Energy Conservation. Section 255.255, F.S., Life -Cycle Costs Architectural — Elevators Rule Chapter 61C-5, F.A.C., Florida Elevator Safety Code ASME A-17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators Architectural — Floodplain Management Criteria Section 255.25, F.S., Approval Required Prior to Construction or Lease of Buildings Rules of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Architectural — Other Rule Chapter 64E-6, F.A.C., Standards for On Site Sewage Disposal Systems (Septic Tanks) Rule Chapter 62-600, F.A.C., Domestic Wastewater Facilities Rule Chapter 62-761, F.A.C., Underground Storage Tank Systems American Concrete Institute American Institute of Architects - Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice American Society for Testing and Materials - ASTM Standards Brick Institute of America DMS - Standards for Design of State Facilities Florida Concrete Products Association FDOT — ADA/Accessibility Procedure FDOT — Building Code Compliance Procedure FDOT — Design Build Procurement and Administration LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System National Concrete Masonry Association National Electrical Code Portland Cement Association - Concrete Masonry Handbook United State Green Building Council (USGBC) 2.22 Services to be Performed by the COUNTY When appropriate and /or available, the COUNTY will provide project data including: Numbers for field books. Preliminary Horizontal Network Control. Access for the CONSULTANT to utilize the COUNTY's Information Technology Resources. All COUNTY agreements with Utility Agency Owner (UAO). All certifications necessary for project letting. Building Construction Permit Coordination (Turnpike) All information that may come to the COUNTY pertaining to future improvements. All future information that may come to the COUNTY during the term of the CONSULTANT's Agreement, which in the opinion of the COUNTY is necessary for the prosecution of the work. Available traffic and planning data. All approved utility relocations. Project utility certification to the COUNTY's Central Office. Any necessary title searches. Engineering standards review services. All available information in the possession of the COUNTY pertaining to utility companies whose facilities may be affected by the proposed construction. All future information that may come to the COUNTY pertaining to subdivision plans so that the CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing right of way. Systems traffic for Projected Design Year, with K, D, and T factors. Previously constructed Highway Beautification or Landscape Construction Plans Landscape Opportunity Plan(s) Existing right of way maps. Existing cross slope data for all RRR projects. Existing pavement evaluation report for all RRR projects. PD&E Documents Design Reports Letters of authorization designating the CONSULTANT as an agent of the COUNTY in accordance with F.S. 337.274. Phase reviews of plans and engineering documents. Regarding Environmental Permitting Services: Approved Permit Document when available. Approval of all contacts with environmental agencies. General philosophies and guidelines of the COUNTY to be used in the fulfillment of this contract. Objectives, constraints, budgetary limitations, and time constraints will be completely defined by the Project Manager. Appropriate signatures on application forms. 3 PROJECT COMMON AND PROJECT GENERAL TASKS Project Common Tasks Project Common Tasks, as listed below, are work efforts that are applicable to many project activities, 4 (Roadway Analysis) through 36 (31) Modeling). These tasks are to be included in the project scope in each applicable activity when the described work is to be performed by the CONSULTANT. Project Research: The CONSULTANT shall perform research of existing PUD and DRI documents for developments adjacent to the project for commitments regarding Right-of-way, Stormwater Management, Roadway Improvements, or any other commitments involving the interests of the COUNTY. Project Research: The CONSULTANT shall research existing engineering Studies, PUD, and DRI documents for developments adjacent to the project for commitments regarding Right-of-way, Stormwater Management, Roadway Improvements, or any other commitments involving the interests of the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall anticipate up to ten (10) PUD's or DRI's approved by the COUNTY to be incorporated into the plans before Phase IV plans submittal stage of the contract. Cost Estimates: The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for producing an opinion of probable construction cost estimate and reviewing and updating the cost estimate at project milestones — Phase I (30%), II (60%), III (90%), and IV (100% or final) including the bid schedule. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for inputting the pay items and quantities into a Summary of Pay Items sheet with all required Plans submittals as required. Technical Special Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall provide Technical Special Provisions for all items of work not covered by the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and the workbook of implemented modifications. A Technical Special Provision shall not modify the Standard Specifications and implement modifications in any way. The Technical Special Provisions shall describe work, materials, equipment, and specific requirements, method of measurement, and basis of payment. Proposed Technical Special Provisions will be submitted to the COUNTY's Project Manager for review and approval before incorporating into the contract documents. The Technical Special Provisions will be reviewed for suitability in accordance with the Handbook for Preparation of Specification Packages. The COUNTY's Project Manager will provide the Technical Special Provisions to the County Attorney's Office for review and comment. All comments will be returned to the CONSULTANT for correction and resolution. Final Technical Special Provisions shall be digitally signed and sealed in accordance with applicable Florida Statutes Supplemental Terms and Conditions (Exhibit I): The CONSULTANT shall provide Supplemental Terms and Conditions (STC) as required by the project. Supplemental Terms and Conditions are defined as follows: A Supplemental Term and Condition shall not modify the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction in any way but shall provide instructions to the contractor regarding the contract documents that are not covered by the FDOT's Standard Specification and are not classified as a Technical Special Provision. STCs are project specific and related to the COUNTY's general procedures and practices and take precedence over any conflicting terms in the order of contract documents. Field Reviews: The CONSULTANT shall make as many trips to the project site as required to obtain necessary data for all elements of the project. Technical Meetings: The CONSULTANT shall attend all technical meetings necessary to execute the Scope of Services of this contract. This includes meetings with the COUNTY and FDOT or other Agency staff, between disciplines and CONSULTANT'S, such as access management meetings, pavement design meetings, local governments, progress review meetings (phase review), and miscellaneous meetings. The CONSULTANT shall prepare, and submit to the COUNTY' S Project Manager for review, the meeting minutes for all meetings attended by them. The meeting minutes are due within five (5) working days of attending the meeting. Quality Assurance/Quality Control: It is the intention of the COUNTY that design CONSULTANTS, including their subconsultant(s), are held responsible for their work, including plans review. The purpose of CONSULTANT plan reviews is to ensure that CONSULTANT plans follow the plan preparation procedures outlined in the FDOT Design Manual, that state and federal design criteria are followed with the FDOT concept, and that the CONSULTANT submittals are complete. All subconsultant document submittals shall be submitted by the subconsultant directly to the CONSULTANT for their independent Quality Assurance/Quality Control review and subsequent submittal to the COUNTY. It is the CONSULTANT'S responsibility to independently and continually QC their plans and other deliverables. The CONSULTANT should regularly communicate with the COUNTY's Design Project Manager to discuss and resolve issues or solicit opinions from those within designated areas of expertise. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and coordination of all surveys, designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT and their subconsultant(s) under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all maps, design drawings, specifications, and other documentation prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan shall be one specifically designed for this project. The CONSULTANT shall submit a Quality Control Plan for approval within twenty (20) business days of the written Notice to Proceed. It shall be signed by the CONSULTANT's Project Manager and the CONSULTANT QC Manager. The Quality Control Plan shall include the names of the CONSULTANT's staff that will perform the quality control reviews. The Quality Control reviewer shall be a Florida Licensed Professional Engineer fully prequalified under F.A.C. 14-75 in the reviewed work type. A marked -up set of prints from a Quality Control Review indicating the reviewers for each component (structures, roadway, drainage, signals, geotechnical, signing and marking, lighting, landscape, surveys, etc.) and a written resolution of comments on a point -by - point basis will be required, if requested by the COUNTY, with each phase submittal. The responsible Professional Engineer, Landscape Architect, or Professional Surveyor & Mapper who performed the Quality Control review will sign a statement certifying that the review was conducted and met the required specifications. The CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct all errors or deficiencies in the designs, maps, drawings, specifications, and/or other products and services. Independent Peer Review: When directed by the COUNTY, a subconsultant may perform Independent Peer Reviews. Independent Peer Review and a Constructability/Biddability Review for design Phase Plans document submittals are required on this project. These separate reviews shall be completed by someone who has not worked on the plan component that is being reviewed. These could include but are not limited to a separate office under the Prime's umbrella, a subconsultant that is qualified in the work group being reviewed, or a CEI. It does not include persons who have knowledge of the day-to-day design efforts. The ConstructabilityBiddability Review shall be performed by a person with experience working on COUNTY construction projects (CEI, Contractor, etc.). The Independent Peer Review for design Phase Plans submittals shall ensure the plans meet the FDM, the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways ("Florida Greenbook"), Standard Plans, and FDOT CADD Manual. The ConstructabilityBiddability Review shall ensure the project can be constructed and paid for as designed. Constructability/Biddability Reviews should be conducted prior to the 90% and Final submittals, using the FDOT Phase Review Checklist (Guidance Document 1-1-A) from the Construction Project Administration Manual (CPAM) as a minimum guideline. The CONSULTANT shall submit this checklist and the "marked -up" set of plans during this review and review comments and comment responses from any previous ConstructabilityBiddability reviews. These items will be reviewed by COUNTY's Project Manager. Supervision: The CONSULTANT shall supervise all technical design activities. Coordination: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with all project disciplines to produce a final set of construction documents. Project General Tasks Project General Tasks, described in Sections 3.1 through 3.14 below, represent work efforts that are applicable to the project and not to any one or more specific project activity. The work described in these tasks shall be performed by the CONSULTANT when included in the project scope. 3.1 Public Involvement The CONSULTANT shall prepare for and attend (1) public meeting, after the 60% Phase plan submittal as directed by the COUNTY. Public involvement includes communicating to all interested persons, groups, and government organizations information regarding the development of the project. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the COUNTY drafts of all Public Involvement documents (i.e., newsletters, property owner letters, advertisements, etc.) associated with the following tasks for review and approval at least five (5) business days prior to printing and / or distribution. The public need will heavily influence the construction schedule, construction phasing, and maintenance of traffic. The CONSULTANT shall develop collaborative project solutions to maintain necessary public access during construction. The public meetings will be scheduled after the 60% submittals. The goal of the public meeting will be to introduce the design phase of the project to the public and receive feedback. The CONSULTANT shall process the public information received, discuss the results, and integrate the needs of the public into the project if requested by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT should be mindful of economic feasibility and the needs of the project defined herein when incorporating changes. The CONSULTANT will be expected to develop and provide all necessary exhibits for the public meetings. Collect Public Input — This activity occurs throughout the life of the project, requiring the CONSULTANT to maintain files, newspaper clippings, letters, emails, and any record of direct contact before, during, and after the Public Workshops. Input will be gathered during the Public Workshops, or by other methods, such as personal contact, letters, surveys, visits, phone calls, website comments in response to or following said meeting. Comments and Coordination Report — A comments and coordination report shall be prepared, containing documentation of the public participation accomplished throughout the design period. This report should summarize and respond to the comments received from the public involvement workshops, agency coordination, etc. 3.1.1 Public Involvement Plan At the onset, the CONSULTANT will prepare a written Public Involvement Plan outlining each element of the public involvement projects. The plan shall be updated and amended through the contract and indicate the basic public involvement approach to be taken with the project. It will list the contact persons, media officials, and agencies as well as the means that will be used to involve them in the process. The Public Involvement Plan will be submitted to the COUNTY for approval. 3.1.2 Notifications Upon receipt of the COUNTY's written approval of the Public Involvement Plan, letters shall be prepared and mailed by the CONSULTANT to local government elected officials. The letters shall be consistent with the Public Involvement Plan, introducing the CONSULTANT and informing officials of the project. Additional contacts shall be maintained throughout the study process as designated in the Public Involvement Plan. 3.1.3 Preparing Mailing Lists At the beginning of the project, The CONSULTANT shall identify all impacted property owners and tenants (within a minimum of 300 feet of the project corridor) The CONSULTANT will develop and maintain a computerized database of contacts, beginning with a list of those notified in the Kickoff Notification Process, Public officials, community service organizations, environmental agencies, local and regional transportation officials, and special interest groups shall be identified by the CONSULTANT as those individuals or groups to be affected by the project. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a mailing list of all such entities and shall update the mailing list as needed during the life of the project. 3.1.4 Median Modification Letters The CONSULTANT shall prepare a median modification letter to be sent to property owners along the corridor. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a sketch of each proposed median modification for inclusion in the letter. The letters will be sent on COUNTY letterhead. 3.1.5 Driveway Modification Letters The CONSULTANT shall prepare a driveway modification letter to be sent to property owners along the corridor. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a sketch of each proposed driveway modification for inclusion in the letter. The letters will be sent on COUNTY letterhead. 3.1.6 Newsletters If requested by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT shall prepare newsletters for distribution to elected officials, public officials, property owners along the corridor and other interested parties. The letters will be sent by the CONSULTANT. 3.1.7 Renderings and Fly-Throughs The CONSULTANT shall prepare renderings and fly-throughs for use in public meetings. 3.1.8 PowerPoint Presentations If requested by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT shall prepare PowerPoint presentations for use in public meetings. 3.1.9 Public Meeting Preparations The CONSULTANT shall prepare the necessary materials for use in one public meeting. The COUNTY will investigate potential meeting sites to advise the CONSULTANT on their suitability. The COUNTY will pay all costs for meeting site rents and insurance. 3.1.10 Public Meeting Attendance and Follow-up The CONSULTANT shall attend the public meeting, assist with meeting setup and take down. The CONSULTANT shall also prepare a summary of the public meeting that includes all copies of all materials shown or provided at the public meeting. The summary shall also include a listing of all written comments made during or after the meeting and responses to those written comments. The CONSULTANT will attend the meetings with an appropriate number of personnel to assist the COUNTY'S Project Manager. The CONSULTANT should anticipate one public information meetings during the design process. 3.1.11 Other Agency Meetings In addition to the scheduled public meetings, the CONSULTANT may be required to participate in meetings with local governing authorities and/or Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The CONSULTANT's participation may include, but not be limited to, presentations during the meeting, note taking, and summarizing the meeting in a memo to the file. It is estimated for this project there will be two (2) meetings with local governing authorities and/or MPOs during the design. 3.1.12 Web Site CONSULTANT will provide Public Involvement Graphics to COUNTY for the COUNTY Website. 3.2 Joint Project Agreements — N/A 3.3 Specifications Package Preparation The CONSULTANT shall prepare and provide a specifications package for those specifications NOT considered FDOT Standard Specifications (ex. Lighting, Traffic Signals etc.). The specifications package shall address all items and areas of work and include any Mandatory Specifications, Modified Special Provisions, and Technical Special Provisions. The specifications package must be submitted for review to the COUNTY's Project Manager at least 30 days prior to the 90% plans submittal. This submittal does not require signing and sealing and shall be coordinated through the COUNTY's Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY on the submittal requirements, but at a minimum shall consist of (1) the complete specifications package, (2) a copy of the marked -up workbook used to prepare the package, and (3) a copy of the final project plans. The final submittal of the specifications package must occur at least 10 working days prior to the Final/100% plan submittal. This submittal shall be signed, dated, and sealed in accordance with applicable Florida Statutes. 3.4 Contract Maintenance and Project Documentation Contract maintenance includes project management effort for complete setup and maintenance of files, electronic folders, and documents, developing technical monthly progress reports and schedule updates. Project documentation includes the compilation and delivery of final documents, reports or calculations that support the development of the contract plans; includes uploading files to an FTP server. 3.5 Value Engineering (Multi -Discipline Team) Review — CONSULTANT will prepare for and participate in a Value Engineering Review of the Plans after the 30% Plans Submittal. 3.6 Prime Consultant Project Manager Meetings Includes only the Prime Consultant Project Manager's time for travel and attendance at Activity Technical Meetings and other meetings listed in the meeting summary for Task 3.6 on tab 3 Project General Task of the staff hour forms. Staff hours for other personnel attending Activity Technical Meetings are included in the meeting task for that specific Activity. 3.7 Plans Update The effort needed for Plans Update services will vary from project to project, depending on size and complexity of the project and the duration of time spent "on the shelf." Specific services will be negotiated as necessary as a contract amendment. 3.8 Post Design Services Post Design Services may include, but are not limited to, meetings, construction assistance, plans revisions, shop drawing review, survey services, as -built drawings, and load ratings. Post Design Services are not intended for instances of CONSULTANT errors and/or omissions. All CONSULTANT contact with the Contractor shall be made through the COUNTY'S Construction Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall not contact the Contractor directly unless there is a possible immediate threat to public health and/or safely. The COUNTY'S Construction Project Manager must be contacted immediately thereafter. The COUNTY CEI is responsible for confirming that all quality control testing and requirements of the approved Quality Control Plan have been executed and the results are satisfactory per the design requirements. The CONSULTANT shall visit the construction site at key phases of the project to verify as -built conditions. This will require the CONSULTANT to coordinate with the COUNTY'S Project Manager during construction and attend construction meetings as required or requested by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY'S Project Manager during the Quality Control submittal/review to establish the anticipated stages of construction. The CONSULTANT must notify the COUNTY'S Project Manager of any design related issues as soon as possible. It is important that all significant changes made during construction be documented by the CONTRACTOR in the final as -built plans. The CONTRACTOR shall markup sheets requiring minor (non -engineering analysis) as -built changes and show those changes on the Final Signed and Sealed As -Built Signature Sheet(s). Major changes resulting in issuance of revised contract documents must also be included in the as -built package and recorded appropriately on the Final Signed and Sealed As -built Signature Sheet(s). CONSULTANT will provide PDFs of Plans to CONTRACTOR for preparation of As -Built Drawings by CONTRACTOR. Any changes proposed by the Contractor must be signed and sealed by the Contractor's FOR and approved by the Engineer. This may be a Cost Savings Initiative Proposal (CSIP) redesign or an original design of certain components including Shop Drawings. All original documents obtained by the CONSULTANT will be turned over to the COUNTY at the end of the project or upon request by the COUNTY. All documents obtained for inclusion in the Final As -Built Documents Package must be Quality Control reviewed by the CONSULTANT to ensure correctness and legibility. The CONSULTANT shall contact the COUNTY if any deficiencies are identified. The Final As -Built Documents Package Certification(s) must be digitally signed and sealed by the CEI Consultant Quality assurance material testing will be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR. 3.9 Digital Delivery The CONSULTANT shall deliver final contract plans and documents in digital format (PDF and CAD). The final contract plans, and documents shall be digitally signed, and sealed files delivered to the COUNTY on acceptable electronic media, as determined by the COUNTY. Deliverables shall be provided in both pdf and CADD formats. 3.10 Risk Management The CONSULTANT shall identify potential risks associated with design and construction of the project. Risks may include but not be limited to environmental conditions, public opposition, economic conditions, material costs, right of way costs, utility involvement, permitting delays, loss of key personnel, etc. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the COUNTY a Risk Management Plan following the procedures outlined in FDOT's Project Management Handbook, Chapter 19, preceding the development of 30% design plans. 3.11 Railroad, Transit and/or Airport Coordination —N/A 3.11.1 Aeronautical Evaluation — N/A 3.12 Landscape and Existing Vegetation Coordination Coordinate with the COUNTY' S Project Manager to ensure preservation and protection of existing vegetation. Relocation of existing vegetation may be necessary in some cases. Space for proposed landscape should be preserved and conflicts with drainage, utilities, ITS, and signage should be minimized. Coordination with the COUNTY'S Landscape Architect (Pamela.Lulich@colliercountyfl.gov) may be necessary as defined in 4.12. 3.13 Transit Coordination The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY's Project Manager and Transit Coordinator to include any features needed by the Collier Area Transit (CAT). 3.14 Other Project General Tasks The CONSULTANT shall assist the COUNTY during the construction bidding phase of the project including, but not limited to, attending the pre -bid meeting, addressing addendum, evaluating bids and bidders, and providing written letters of recommendation. 4 ROADWAY ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Roadway Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 4.1 Typical Section Package The CONSULTANT shall submit a Typical Section Package for review before the 30% plans submittal as described in Section 2.0. Minor modifications (if required) shall be incorporated and resubmitted for final approval by the COUNTY. 4.2 Pavement Type Selection Report - N/A 4.3 Pavement Design Package The CONSULTANT shall provide a Pavement Design Package for review and approval before the 60% plans submittal date. 4.4 Cross -Slope Correction The CONSULTANT shall investigate any existing pavement to be retained within the project limits and include any required correction of existing cross -slopes. in the design. Cross slope information will be collected at 100' intervals. After the analysis of the cross slopes a recommendation will be provided as part of the Design Report (Section 4.15). The CONSULTANT will coordinate with Collier County Maintenance to help identify any known locations which may be deficient. 4.5 HorizontalNertical Master Design Files The CONSULTANT shall design the geometrics using the most appropriate design standards. Proper consideration shall be given to the design traffic volumes, design speed, capacity and levels of service, functional classification, adjacent land use, design consistency and driver expectancy, aesthetics, existing vegetation to be preserved, pedestrian and bicycle concerns, ADA requirements, Safe Mobility For Life Program, access management, and scope of work. The CONSULTANT shall also develop utility conflict information to be provided to the project Utility Coordinator in the format requested by the COUNTY. 4.6 Access Management The CONSULTANT shall incorporate access management standards for the project as appropriate. The CONSULTANT shall review adopted access management standards and the existing access conditions (signalized intersection spacing, median opening spacing, and connection spacing). New Median openings and altered existing accesses shall be shown on plan sheets and submitted with supporting documentation for review with the first plans submittal. The COUNTY shall provide access management classification information to be used by the CONSULTANT. 4.7 Roundabout Evaluation — N/A 4.8 Roundabout Final Design Analysis — N/A 4.9 Cross Section Design Files The CONSULTANT shall establish and develop cross section design files in accordance with the FDOT CADD manual. The CONSULTANT shall establish and develop cross section design files in accordance with the applicable FDOT CADD manual sections for the Bentley Microstation platform. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with all utility owners to obtain the location of subsurface facilities. All utilities' existing locations and proposed relocations shall be shown on the cross sections. Includes all work required to establish and utilize intelligent/automated methods for creating cross sections including determining the locations for which all cross sections will be shown, existing and proposed features, cross section refinement, placement of utilities and drainage, soil boxes, R/W lines, earthwork calculations, and other required labeling. 4.10 Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP) Analysis The CONSULTANT shall design a safe and effective TTCP to move vehicular and pedestrian traffic during all phases of construction. The design shall include construction phasing of temporary and permanent roadways ingress and egress to existing property owners and businesses, routing, signing and pavement markings, and detour quantity tabulations, roadway pavement, drainage structures, ditches, front slopes, back slopes, drop offs within clear zone, transit stops, and traffic monitoring sites. Special consideration shall be given to the construction of the drainage system when developing the construction phases. Positive drainage must always be maintained. The design shall include construction phasing of roadways to accommodate the construction or relocation of utilities when the contract includes Joint Project Agreements (JPAs). It is anticipated that the plans will be Level II Traffic Control Plans. The CONSULTANT shall investigate the need for temporary traffic signals, temporary lighting, alternate detour roads, and the use of materials such as sheet piling in the analysis. The Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a certified designer who has completed training as required by the FDOT. Before proceeding with the Traffic Control Plan, the CONSULTANT shall meet with the appropriate COUNTY personnel. The purpose of this meeting is to provide information to the CONSULTANT that will better coordinate the Preliminary and Final TTCP efforts. The CONSULTANT shall consider the local impact of any lane closures or alternate routes. When the need to close a road is identified during this analysis, the CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY's Project Manager as soon as possible. Proposed road closings must be reviewed and approved by the COUNTY. Diligence shall be used to minimize negative impacts by appropriate specifications, recommendations, or plans development. Local impacts to consider will be local events, holidays, peak seasons, detour route deterioration and other eventualities. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for obtaining local authorities' permission to use detour routes, not on state highways. 4.11 Master TTCP Design Files The CONSULTANT shall develop master TTCP files (Level II) showing each phase of the TTCP. This includes all work necessary for designing lane configurations, diversions, lane shifts, signing and pavement markings, temporary traffic control devices, and temporary pedestrian ways. 4.12 Selective Clearing and Grubbing a. Selective Clearing and Grubbing of Existing Vegetation Field Assessment The CONSULTANT shall review information from the COUNTY and conduct a project field assessment of existing vegetation. The field assessment visit is to be attended by the COUNTY'S Project Manager or approved COUNTY representative. The CONSULTANT will provide a condition assessment of the existing vegetation and determine its viability. The CONSULTANT will tag individual trees for location by the surveyor. The deliverable for this item is an Excel Matrix identifying the location, tag number, genus and species, size (DBH for trees, clear trunk height for palms) and condition rating. Coordinate with the surveyor to have trees and vegetation surveyed, per tasks 27.28 or 27.29. The Field Assessments(s) result will determine the course of action for Selective Clearing and Grubbing Plans. The Field Assessments(s) result will determine the course of action for Selective Clearing and Grubbing and the extent of the Vegetation Survey under Task 2.10. b. Selective Clearing and Grubbing Site Inventory Analysis of Existing Vegetation and Cross - Discipline Coordination (OPTIONAL SERVICES) The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY'S Public Utility, Stormwater, and Traffic Operation to ensure that preservation of existing vegetation is coordinated between all disciplines. Coordinate with the COUNTY'S Project Manager. Based on the field assessment, the CONSULTANT may be required to do a site inventory analysis of existing vegetation, opportunities for preservation and protection of existing vegetation, relocation options, and selective removal of nuisance and/or non -nuisance vegetation. Coordinate with surveyor to have trees and vegetation tagged and surveyed, per tasks 27.28 or 27.29. c. Selective Clearing and Grubbing- Existing Vegetation Maintenance Report The CONSULTANT shall include in the plans' instructions for the care and maintenance of the plant preservation areas, and selective clearing and grubbing areas throughout the construction period. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with the Collier County Landscape Architect to ensure that the intent of the plant preservation areas is in alignment with future highway landscape plans. The CONSULTANT should be knowledgeable in arboricultural practices to the extent that they are able to deliver detailed and informed Selective Clearing and Grubbing Plans. 4.13 Tree Disposition/Relocation Plans- N/A 4.14 Design Variations and Exceptions -N/A 4.15 Design Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare all applicable report(s) as listed in the Project Description section of this scope. The CONSULTANT shall submit to the COUNTY design notes, data, and calculations to document the design conclusions reached during the development of the contract plans. The design notes, data, and computations shall be recorded on size 8'/2"xI V sheets, fully titled, numbered, dated, indexed, and signed by the designer and the checker. Computer output forms and other oversized sheets shall be folded to 8%2"xI V size. The data shall be in a hardback folder for submittal to the COUNTY. Digital copies of all paper submittals above shall be provided in pdf or Microsoft Word format. 4.16 Quantities The CONSULTANT shall develop accurate quantities and the supporting documentation, including construction days when required. 4.17 Cost Estimate The CONSULTANT shall provide the Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost at each submittal phase. The Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost shall be updated and adjusted at each submittal to be maintained up to and including final bid documents submittal. 4.18 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall provide Technical Special Provisions for all items of work not covered by the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and recurring special provisions. Standard Specifications, recurring special provisions, and supplemental specifications should not be modified unless necessary to control project -specific requirements. All modifications to other sections must be justified to the COUNTY to be included in the project's specifications package as Technical Special Provisions. The Technical Special Provisions shall describe work, materials, equipment and specific requirements, method of measurement, and basis of payment. These provisions shall be submitted electronically (PDF's). 4.19 Other Roadway Analyses This scope item is considered an Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, scope and fee will be negotiated at that time and will be implemented via Change Order. When applicable, the staff -hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. 4.20 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall include and be available to attend a plans -in -hand field review with the COUNTY at the 60% and 90% submittals. Field reviews will be conducted upon completion of COUNTY reviews of plans submitted by the CONSULTANT for each submittal period. The anticipated format for these meetings will be an in -office review of COUNTY comments in the morning, followed by an afternoon field visit to areas of concern at the project site. This item also includes all trips required to obtain necessary data for all elements of the roadway analysis identified in this scope of work. 4.21 Monitor Existing Structures The CONSULTANT shall perform field observations to visually identify existing structures within the project limits that may require settlement, vibration or groundwater monitoring by the contractor during construction according to FDM Chapter 307. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with and assist the geotechnical engineer and/or structural engineer in identifying those structures and developing mitigation strategies (when applicable). The CONSULTANT shall identify the necessary pay items to be included in the bid documents to monitor existing structures. 4.22 Technical Meetings Includes; meetings with the COUNTY or other Agency staff, between disciplines and CONSULTANTS, such as access management meetings, pavement design meetings, progress review meetings (phase review), road safety audit and miscellaneous meetings necessary for all elements of the roadway analysis identified in this scope of work. 4.23 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of all surveys, designs, drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. 4.24 Independent Peer Review Please see Section 3.0. 4.25 Supervision Includes all efforts required to supervise all technical design activities. 4.26 Coordination Includes all efforts to coordinate all elements of the roadway analysis to produce a final set of construction documents. 5 ROADWAY PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare Roadway, Drainage, TTCP, Utility Adjustment Sheets, plan sheets, notes, and details as shown in the FDM Summary of Phase Submittals Table 301.2.2. The plans shall include the following sheets necessary to convey the intent and scope of the project for the purposes of construction. 5.1 Key Sheet 5.2 Summary of Pay Items Including Quantity Input Drainage map Sheets 5.3 Typical Section Sheets 5.3.1 Typical Sections 5.3.2 Typical Section Details 5.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 5.5 Summary of Quantities Sheets 5.5.1 Summary of Drainage Structures Sheets 5.5.2 Optional Material Tabulation Sheet 5.6 Project Layout 5.7 Plan/Profile Sheet 5.8 Profile Sheet — N/A 5.9 Plan Sheet — N/A 5.10 Special Profile 5.11 Back -of -Sidewalk Profile Sheet 5.12 Interchange Layout Sheet — N/A 5.13 Ramp Terminal Details (Plan View) — N/A 5.14 Intersection Layout Details 5.14.1 Drainage Structure Sheets 5.14.2 Stormwater Facilities Sheets 5.15 Special Details 5.16 Cross -Section Pattern Sheets 5.17 Roadway Soil Survey Sheets 5.18 Cross Sections 5.19 Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets 5.20 Temporary Traffic Control Cross Section Sheets 5.21 Temporary Traffic Control Detail Sheets 5.22 Utility Adjustment Sheets 5.23 Selective Clearing and Grubbing Sheets 5.23.1 Selective Clearing and Grubbing 5.23.2 Selective Clearing and Grubbing Details 5.24 Tree Disposition Plan Sheets- N/A 5.24.1 Tree Disposition Plan Sheets -N/A 5.24.2 Tree Disposition Plan Tables and Schedules — N/A 5.25 Project Control Sheets 5.26 Environmental Detail Sheets — N/A 5.27 Utility Verification Sheets (SUE Data) 5.28 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 5.29 Supervision 6 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Drainage Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. The CONSULTANT shall make drainage design recommendations to the COUNTY for the type of drainage system that should be used for the project, i.e., closed -drainage system and/or open roadside ditches. Once the drainage system is accepted and approved by the SFWMD and the Notice of Intent to Permit from SFWMD is received, any changes to the system requested by the COUNTY shall be considered as Additional Services. The CONSULTANT is responsible for designing a drainage and stormwater management system that complies with the requirements of the appropriate regulatory agencies (SFWMD) and the FDOT's Drainage Manual. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate fully with the appropriate permitting agencies and COUNTY staff. All activities and submittals should be coordinated through the COUNTY's Project Manager. The work will include the engineering analyses for any or all the following: 6.1 Drainage Analysis 6.1.1 Drainage Map Hydrology The CONSULTANT shall create a (pre -and/or post -condition) working drainage basin map to be used in defining the system hydrology. This map shall incorporate drainage basin boundaries, existing survey and/or LiDAR, and field observations, as necessary, to define the system. Basin delineations shall also include any existing collection systems in a logical manner to aid in the development of the hydraulic model. Include coordination hours needed to convey drainage hydrologic features onto produced drainage maps. Examine all adjacent property outfall points to determine whether accommodations for offsite drainage must be incorporated into the project drainage system. 6.1.2 Base Clearance Calculations The CONSULTANT shall analyze, determine, and document high water elevations per basin which will be used to set roadway profile grade and roadway materials. Determine surface water elevations at cross drains, floodplains, outfalls and adjacent stormwater ponds. Determine groundwater elevations at intervals between the above -mentioned surface waters. Document findings in a Drainage Report. 6.1.3 Pond Siting Analysis and Report Evaluate pond sites using a preliminary hydrologic analysis. Document the results and coordination for all the project's pond site analyses. The Drainage Manual provides specific documentation requirements. 6.1.4 Design of Cross Drains 6.1.5 Design of Ditches Design roadway conveyance. This task includes capacity calculations, longitudinal grade adjustments, flow changes, additional adjustments for ditch convergences, selection of suitable channel lining, design of side drainpipes, and documentation. (Design of linear stormwater management facilities in separate task.) 6.1.6 Design of Stormwater Management Facility (Offsite or Infield Pond) Design stormwater management facilities to meet requirements for stormwater quality treatment, attenuation and aesthetics. Develop proposed pond layout (contributing drainage basin, shape, contours, slopes, volumes, tie-ins, aesthetics, etc.), perform routing, pollutant/nutrient loading calculations, recovery calculations, design the outlet control structure and buoyancy calculations for pond liners when necessary. 6.1.7 Design of Stormwater Management Facility (Roadside Treatment Swales and Linear Ponds) -NA The CONSULTANT shall design stormwater management facilities to meet stormwater quality treatment, attenuation, and aesthetics requirements. Develop proposed pond layout (contributing drainage basin, shape, contours, slopes, volumes, tie-ins, aesthetics, etc.), perform routing, pollutant/nutrient loading calculations, recovery calculations, and design the outlet control structure. Document the design in a Drainage Report. 6.1.8 Design of Floodplain Compensation Determine floodplain encroachments, coordinate with regulatory agencies, and develop proposed compensation area layout (shape, contours, slopes, volumes, etc.). Document the design following the requirements of the regulatory agency. 6.1.9 Design of Storm Drains Delineate contributing drainage areas, determine runoff, inlet locations, and spread. Calculate hydraulic losses (friction, utility conflict, and, if necessary, minor losses). Determine design tailwater and, if necessary, outlet scour protection. 6.1.10 Optional Culvert Material Determine acceptable options for pipe materials using the Culvert Service Life Estimator. 6.1.11 French Drain Systems —N/A 6.1.11 a Existing French Drain Systems — N/A 6.1.12 Drainage Wells — N/A 6.1.13 Drainage Design Documentation Report Compile drainage design documentation into report format. Include documentation for all the drainage design tasks and associated meetings and decisions. 6.1.14 Bridge Hydraulic Report Calculate hydrology, hydraulics, deck drainage, scour, and appropriate countermeasures. Prepare report and the information for the Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheet. 6.1.15 Temporary Drainage Analysis Evaluate and address drainage to adequately drain the road and maintain existing offsite drainage during all construction phases. Provide documentation. 6.1.16 Cost Estimate Prepare cost estimates for the drainage components, except bridges and earthwork for stormwater management and flood compensation sites. 6.1.17 Technical Special Provisions / Modified Special Provisions 6.1.18 Hydroplaning Analysis — N/A 6.1.19 Existing Permit Analysis Data gathering including desktop analysis of local, state, and federal Drainage permits. 6.1.20 Other Drainage Analysis Includes all efforts for a drainage task not covered by an existing defined task. 6.1.21 Noise Barrier Evaluation — N/A 6.1.22 Field Reviews 6.1.23 Technical Meetings Meetings with COUNTY staff, regulatory agencies, local governments such as meetings with the Water Management District, FDEP, etc. 6.1.24 Environmental Look -Around Meetings Convene a meeting with COUNTY staff, regulatory agencies, local governments, and other stakeholders to explore watershed -wide stormwater needs and alternative permitting approaches. 6.1.25 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 6.1.26 Independent Peer Review 6.1.27 Supervision 6.1.28 Coordination 6.2 DRAINAGE PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare Drainage plan sheets, notes, and details. The plans shall include the following sheets necessary to convey the intent and scope of the project for the purposes of construction. 6.2.1 Drainage Map 6.2.2 Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheets 6.2.3 Summary of Drainage Structures 6.2.4 Optional Pipe/Culvert Material 6.2.5 Drainage Structure Sheet(s) (Per Structure) 6.2.6 Miscellaneous Drainage Detail Sheets 6.2.7 Lateral Ditch Plan/Profile 6.2.8 Lateral Ditch Cross Sections 6.2.9 Retention/Detention Pond Detail Sheet(s) 6.2.10 Retention Pond Cross Sections 6.2.11 Erosion Control Plan Sheet(s) 6.2.12 SWPPP Sheet(s) 6.2.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 6.2.14 Supervision 7 UTILITIES The CONSULTANT shall identify utility facilities and secure agreements, utility work schedules, and plans from the Utility Agency Owners (UAO), ensuring all conflicts between utility facilities and the COUNTY's construction project are addressed. The CONSULTANT shall follow FDOT and COUNTY standards, policies, procedures and design criteria. COUNTY standards are located at: http://www.collier og vnet/your-government/divisions- s-z/water/utilities-standards-manual 7.1 Utility Kickoff Meeting Before any contact with the UAO(s), the CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY Project Manager to receive guidance, as may be required, to assure that all necessary coordination will be accomplished in accordance with COUNTY procedures. CONSULTANT shall bring a copy of the design project work schedule reflecting utility activities. 7.2 Identify Existing Utility Agency Owner(s) The CONSULTANT shall identify all utilities within and adjacent to the project limits that may be impacted by the project. 7.3 Make Utility Contacts First Contact: The CONSULTANT shall send letters and two sets of plans to each utility, one set for the utility office and one set to the COUNTY Offices as required by the District. Includes contact by phone for meeting coordination. Request type, size, location, easements, and relocation costs if reimbursement is claimed. Request the voltage level for power lines in the project area. Send UAO requests for reimbursement to COUNTY for a legal opinion. Include the meeting schedule (if applicable) and the design schedule. Include typical meeting agenda. If scheduling a meeting, give 3 weeks advance notice. Second Contact: At a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the meeting, the CONSULTANT shall transmit two complete sets of 60% plans and the utility conflict information (when applicable and in the format requested by the COUNTY) to each UAO having facilities located within the project limits, and one set to the COUNTY Offices as required by the COUNTY Project Manager. Third Contact: Identify agreements and assemble packages. The CONSULTANT shall send agreements, letters, the utility conflict information (when applicable and in the format requested by the COUNTY) and one set of plans to the UAO(s) including all component sets, one set for the utility office, one set to construction and maintenance if required. Include the design schedule. Not all projects will have all contacts as described above. 7.4 Exception Processing The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for transmitting/coordinating the appropriate design reports, including, but not limited to, the Preliminary Engineering Report and the Project Scope to each UAO to identify any condition that may require a Utility Exception. The CONSULTANT shall identify and communicate to the UAO any facilities in conflict with their location or project schedule. The CONSULTANT shall assist with processing design exceptions involving Utilities with the UAO and the COUNTY. Assist with processing per the UAM. 7.5 Preliminary Utility Meeting The CONSULTANT shall schedule (time and place), notify participants, and conduct a preliminary utility meeting with all UAO(s) having facilities located within the project limits to present the project, review the current design schedule, evaluate the utility information collected, provide follow-up information on compensable property rights from the COUNTY Legal Office, discuss the utility work by highway contractor option with each utility, and discuss any future design issues that may impact utilities. This is also an opportunity for the UAO(s) to present proposed facilities. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes and distribute a copy to all attendees. 7.6 Individual/Field Meetings The CONSULTANT shall meet with each UAO as necessary, separately or together, throughout the project design duration to provide guidance in the interpretation of plans, review changes to the plans and schedules, standard or selective clearing and grubbing work, and assist in the development of the UAO(s) plans and work schedules. In addition, the CONSULTANT is responsible for motivating the UAO to complete and return the necessary documents after each Utility Contact or Meeting. 7.7 Collect and Review Plans and Data from UAO(s) The CONSULTANT shall review utility -marked plans and data individually as they are received for content. Ensure information from the UAO (utility type, material, and size) is sent to the designer for inclusion in the plans. Forward all requests for utility reimbursement and supporting documentation to the COUNTY. 7.8 Subordination of Easements Coordination — N/A 7.9 Utility Design Meeting The CONSULTANT shall schedule (time and place), notify participants, and conduct a Utility meeting with all affected UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall be prepared to discuss impacts to existing trees/vegetation and proposed landscape, drainage, traffic signalization, temporary traffic control plans (TTCP) (construction phasing), review the current design schedule and letting date, evaluate the utility information collected, provide follow-up information on compensable property rights from COUNTY Legal Office, discuss with each UAO the utility work by highway contractor option, discuss any future design issues that may impact utilities, etc., to the extent that they may affect existing or proposed utility facilities with particular emphasis on drainage and TTCP with each UAO. This meeting shall assist the UAOs in identifying and resolving conflicts between utilities and proposed construction before completion of the plans, including utility adjustment details. Also, to work with the UAOs to recommend potential resolution between known utility conflicts with proposed construction plans as may be deemed practical by the UAO. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings and distribute a copy to all attendees within three days. See Task 4.5 (HorizontalNertical Master Design File) and Task 4.9 (Cross Section Design Files) for utility conflict location identification and adjustments. 7.10 Review Utility Markups & Work Schedules and Processing of Schedules & Agreements The CONSULTANT shall review utility marked -up plans and work schedules as they are received for content and coordinate review with the designer. Send color markups and schedules to the appropriate COUNTY office(s) such as survey, geotechnical, drainage, structures, lighting, roadway, signals, utilities, landscape architecture, municipalities, maintaining agency, and COUNTY Traffic Operations for review and comment. Coordinate with the COUNTY for execution. Distribute Executed Final Documents. Prepare Work Order for UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY PUD the programming of necessary Work Program funds. 7.11 Utility Coordination/Follow-up The CONSULTANT shall provide utility coordination and follow-up. This includes follow-up, interpreting plans, and assisting the UAOs with the completion of their work schedules and agreements. Includes phone calls, face-to-face meetings, etc., to motivate and ensure the UAO(s) complete and return the required documents in accordance with the project schedule. In addition, ensure the resolution of all known conflicts. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings and distribute a copy to all attendees. This task can be applied to all phases of the project. 7.12 Utility Constructability Review The CONSULTANT shall review utility schedules against construction contract time and phasing for compatibility. ; (Cross Section Design Files) for utility conflict identification and adjustments. 7.13 Additional Utility Services The CONSULTANT shall provide additional utility services. The CONSULTANT shall, via soft - dig, potholing, or other non-destructive method, physically obtain the horizontal and vertical location, size, type, material, and condition, of all underground utilities within and surrounding all proposed foundations for signal poles, light poles, retaining walls, piles, culverts, or other critical locations where foundation construction is proposed, or as directed by the COUNTY'S Construction Project Manager. A quantity of 50 underground locates (Vvh's) are anticipated for this project and is included in this Scope of Services This scope item is considered an Additional/Optional service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, a Notice to Proceed will be issued to execute the work 7.14 Processing Utility Work by Highway Contractor (UWHC) This includes coordination of utility design effort between the COUNTY and the UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall conduct additional coordination meetings, prepare and process the agreements, review tabulation of quantities, perform UWHC constructability and biddability review, review pay items, cost estimates, and Technical Special Provisions (TSP) or Modified Special Provision (MSP) prepared by the UAO. This does not include utility the utility design effort. This item will be added as a supplemental agreement when the need is identified. 7.15 Contract Plans to UAO(s) The CONSULTANT shall transmit the contract plans as processed for letting to the UAO(s). Transmittals to UAO(s) may be by certified mail, return receipt requested. 7.16 Certification/Close-Out This includes hours for transmitting utility files to the COUNTY and preparation of the Utility Certification Letter. The CONSULTANT shall certify to the COUNTY Project Manager the following: All utility negotiations (Full execution of each agreement, approved Utility Work Schedules, Technical Special Provisions or Modified Special Provisions written, etc.) have been completed with arrangements made for utility work to be undertaken and completed as required for proper coordination with the physical construction schedule. OR An on -site inspection was made, and no utility work will be involved. OR Plans were sent to the Utility Companies/Agencies and no utility work is required. OR A No Response letter on COUNTY letter, delivered to the UAO via certified mail, return receipt requested, documenting all failed attempts to obtain RGBs, UWS or No Conflict letter from any non -responsive UAO. 7.17 Other Utilities This scope item is considered an Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, the scope and fee will be negotiated at the time. They will be implemented via Change Order or Contract Amendment. When applicable, the staff -hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY Project Manager and other appropriate COUNTY personnel in advance of all scheduled meetings with the regulatory agencies to allow a COUNTY representative to attend. The CONSULTANT shall copy the COUNTY Project Manager on all permit -related correspondence and meetings. The CONSULTANT shall use current regulatory guidelines and policies for all permits required as identified in Section 2.4. 8.1 Preliminary Project Research The CONSULTANT shall perform preliminary project research and be responsible for regulatory agency coordination to assure those design efforts are properly directed toward permit requirements. The research shall include but should not be limited to a review of the project's Corridor Study. The CONSULTANT shall research any existing easements or other restrictions that may exist both within or adjacent to the proposed project boundary. Project research may include but should not be limited to reviewing available federal, state, and local permit files and databases; and local government information, including COUNTY and property appraiser data. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall determine if any Sovereign Submerged Lands easements need to be modified or acquired. Any applicable information will be shown on the plans as appropriate. 8.2 Field Work 8.2.1 Pond Site Alternatives: The CONSULTANT shall review alternative pond sites as directed by the COUNTY, and information shall be included in the Pond Siting Report. 8.2.2 Establish Wetland Jurisdictional Lines and Assessments The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for, but not limited to, the following activities: Determine landward extent of wetlands and other surface waters as detailed in Rule Chapter 62- 340, F.A.C., as ratified in Section 373.4211, F.S..; and Rule Chapter 62-331, F.A.0 and the State 404 Program Applicants Handbook. Collect all data and information necessary to determine the jurisdictional boundaries of wetlands and other surface waters as defined by the rules or regulations of each permitting agency processing a COUNTY permit application for the project. Where reasonable and applicable, set seasonal high-water levels in adjacent wetlands with biological indicators. Obtain a jurisdictional determination as defined by the rules or regulations of each permitting agency processing a COUNTY permit application for the project. Prepare aerial maps showing the jurisdictional boundaries of wetlands and other surface waters. Aerial maps shall be reproducible, of a scale of 1" = 400'or more detailed and be recent photography. The maps shall show the jurisdictional boundaries of each agency. Photocopies of aerials are not acceptable. When necessary, a wetland -specific survey will be prepared by a registered surveyor and mapper. All surveyed jurisdictional boundaries are to be tied to the project's baseline of survey. Prepare a written assessment of the current condition and functional value of the wetlands and other surface waters. Prepare data in tabular form, which includes the ID number for each wetland (and other surface water, if necessary) impacted, size of wetland to be impacted, type of impact, and identify any wetland (by ID number and size) within the project limits that will not be impacted by the project. Prepare appropriate agency forms to obtain required permits. Forms may include but are not limited to the USACE "Wetland Determination Data Form — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region"; the USACE "Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form"; Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method forms and/or project -specific data forms. 8.2.3 Species Surveys: The CONSULTANT shall conduct wildlife surveys as defined by rules or regulations of any permitting agency or commenting agency that is processing a COUNTY permit. 8.3 Agency Verification of Wetland Data The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for verifying wetland and other surface water data identified in Section 8.2 and coordinating regulatory agency field reviews, including finalizing assessments and jurisdictional determinations with applicable agencies. 8.4 Complete and Submit All Required Permit Applications The CONSULTANT shall collect all the data and information necessary to prepare the permit applications and obtain the environmental permits required to construct the project as identified in the Project Description and as described in 8.4.1, 8.4.2, and 8.12 (Other Permits). The CONSULTANT shall prepare each permit application in accordance with the rules and/or regulations of the regulatory agency responsible for issuing a specific permit and/or authorization to perform work. The permit application packages must be approved by the COUNTY prior to submittal to regulatory agencies. The CONSULTANT will submit all permit applications, as directed by the COUNTY, and be responsible for payment of all permit and public noticing fees. 8.4.1 Complete and Submit all Required Wetland Permit Applications: The CONSULTANT shall prepare, complete, and submit required wetland permit (i.e., ERP, Section 404) application packages to the appropriate regulatory agencies. This includes, but is not limited to, applications submitted to WMDs and/or DEP and USACE. The application package may include but is not limited to attachments (i.e. project location map, aerials, affidavit of ownership, pictures, additional technical analysis, etc.), a cover letter with project description, and completion of applicable agency forms. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall prepare and respond to agency Requests for Additional Information (RAIs), including necessary revisions to the application package. The COUNTY must approve all responses and completed application packages prior to submittal to the regulatory agencies. Geotechnical permitting should also be prepared, submitted, and obtained. 8.4.2 Complete and Submit all Required Species Permit Applications: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the appropriate permitting agencies, including the US Fish and Wildlife Service and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. In support of agency consultation, the CONSULTANT shall provide supporting documentation, including project location map, aerials, affidavit of ownership, pictures, additional technical analysis, etc. The CONSULTANT shall also prepare, complete, and submit required species permit applications to the appropriate agencies. This includes federal and state -protected species permit application packages as required. The work includes completion of application package (i.e. project location map, aerials, affidavit of ownership, pictures, additional technical analysis, etc.), cover letter with project description, and completion of applicable forms. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall respond to agency RAIs, including necessary revisions to the application package. All responses and completed applications must be approved by the COUNTY prior to submittal to the regulatory agency. 8.5 Coordinate and Review Dredge and Fill Sketches The CONSULTANT shall review Dredge and Fill Detail sheets to ensure the information on the sketch(es) meets the regulatory agencies' requirements and are appropriate for environmental permit application submittal and acquisition. The CONSULTANT will also provide environmental data/information as needed to support the preparation of the Dredge and Fill sketches. 8.6 Prepare USCG Permit Application — N/A 8.7 Prepare Water Management District or Local Water Control District Right of Way Occupancy Permit Application The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the preparation of the ROW Occupancy permit application in accordance with the regulatory agency requirements. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for acquiring the ROW Occupancy permit. 8.8 Prepare Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) Permit Application — N/A 8.9 Prepare USACE Section 408 Application to Alter a Civil Works Project — N/A 8.10 Compensatory Mitigation Plan If impacts cannot be avoided, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY appropriate mitigation to offset impacts. Mitigation will be summarized as part of the Environmental Resource Permit and Section 404 permit applications. The COUNTY will direct the CONSULTANT to investigate the mitigation options that meet federal and state requirements in accordance with section 373.4137, F.S. Below are mitigation options: Purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank Payment to DEP/WMD for mitigation services Monetary participation in offsite regional mitigation plans Creation/restoration of wetlands on public lands or on the right of way purchased by the COUNTY or on existing COUNTY right of way As an Optional Service, in the event that physical creation or restoration is the only feasible alternative to offset wetland impacts, the CONSULTANT shall collect all the data and information necessary to prepare mitigation plans acceptable to all permitting agencies and commenting agencies who are processing or reviewing a permit application for a COUNTY project. Prior to selection of a final creation/restoration mitigation site, the CONSULTANT will provide the following services in the development of a mitigation plan: Preliminary jurisdictional determination for each proposed site Selection of alternative sites Coordination of alternative sites with the COUNTY/all environmental agencies Written narrative listing potential sites with justifications for both recommended and non - recommended sites. 8.11 Mitigation Coordination and Meetings The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY personnel prior to approaching any environmental permitting or commenting agencies. Once a mitigation plan has been reviewed and approved by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT will be responsible for coordinating the proposed mitigation plan with the environmental agencies. The CONSULTANT will provide mitigation information needed to update the COUNTY Project Manager. 8.12 Other Environmental Permits This scope item is considered Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is deemed necessary and requested by the COUNTY, the scope and fee will be negotiated at that time and implemented via Change Order. When applicable, the staff -hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. 8.13 Technical Support to the COUNTY for Environmental Clearances and Re-evaluations — N/A 8.14 Preparation of Environmental Clearances and Re-evaluations (use when CONSULTANT prepares all documents associated with a re-evaluation) — N/A 8.15 Contamination Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall prepare Contamination Screening Evaluation for the project limits, including stormwater ponds and floodplain compensation sites as described in Part 2, Chapter 20, of the PD&E Manual. The appropriate level of analysis and deliverable type will be approved by the COUNTY's Project Manager. The draft Level, 1 Contamination Screening Evaluation document, shall be submitted to the COUNTY's Project Manager for review and final approval. A Level I Contamination Screening Evaluation Report will provide the project impacts, conclusions and recommendations, figures, tables, and appendices. The CONSULTANT shall provide Level II assessment services. If contamination is identified within the limits of construction, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY Project Manager to properly mark identified contamination areas in the plans and develop specifications as appropriate. 8.16 Asbestos Survey - N/A 8.17 Technical Meetings 8.18 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 8.19 Supervision 8.20 Coordination STRUCTURES - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS TASKS AND DRAWINGS The CONSULTANT shall analyze, design, and develop contract documents for all structures in accordance with applicable provisions as defined in Section 2.19, Provisions for Work. Individual tasks identified in Sections 9 through 18 are defined in the Staff Hour Estimation Handbook and within the provision defined in Section 2. 20, Provisions for Work. Contract documents shall display economical solutions for the given conditions. The CONSULTANT shall provide Design Documentation to the COUNTY with each submittal consisting of structural design calculations and other supporting documentation developed during the development of the plans. The design calculations submitted shall adequately address the complete design of all structural elements. These calculations shall be neatly and logically presented on digital media or, at the COUNTY's request, on 8 'h"xI 1" paper, and all sheets shall be numbered. The final design calculations shall be signed and sealed by a Florida -licensed professional engineer. A cover sheet indexing the contents of the calculations shall be included, and the engineer shall sign and seal that sheet. All computer programs and parameters used in the design calculations shall include sufficient backup information to facilitate the review task. 9.1 Key Sheet and Index of Drawings 9.2 Project Layout 9.3 General Notes and Bid Item Notes 9.4 Miscellaneous Common Details 9.5 Incorporate Report of Core Borings 9.6 Standard Plans- Bridges 9.7 Existing Bridge Plans — if available 9.8 Assemble Plan Summary Boxes and Quantities 9.9 Cost Estimate 9.10 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 9.11 Field Reviews 9.12 Technical Meetings 9.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 9.14 Independent Peer Review 9.15 Supervision 9.16 Coordination 10 STRUCTURES - BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REPORT The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Bridge Development Report (BDR). The BDR shall be submitted as part of the Phase I Roadway Submittal, General Requirements. General Requirements 10.1 Bridge Geometry 10.2 Ship Impact Data Collection -NA 10.3 Ship Impact Criteria -NA Superstructure Alternatives 10.4 Short -Span Concrete 10.5 Medium -Span Concrete 10.6 Long Span Concrete -NA 10.7 Structural Steel -NA Foundation and Substructure Alternatives 10.8 Pier/Bent 10.9 Shallow Foundations / GRS Abutments 10.10 Deep Foundations Movable Span - NA 10.11 Data Collection and Design Criteria 10.12 Movable Span Geometrics and Clearances 10.13 Deck System Evaluation 10.14 Framing Plan Development 10.15 Main Girder Preliminary Design 10.16 Conceptual Span Balance/Counterweight 10.17 Support System Development 10.18 Drive Power Calculations 10.19 Drive System Development 10.20 Power and Control Development 10.21 Conceptual Pier Design 10.22 Foundation Analysis (FL PIER) 10.23 Tender Visibility Study Other BDR Issues 10.24 Aesthetics 10.25 TTCP/Staged Construction Requirements 10.26 Constructability Requirements 10.27 Load Rating for Damaged/Widened Structures 10.28 Quantity and Cost Estimates 10.29 Quantity and Cost Estimates - Movable Span -NA 10.30 Wall Type Justification Report Preparation 10.31 Exhibits 10.32 Exhibits - Movable Span -NA 10.33 Report Preparation 10.34 Report Preparation - Movable Span -NA 10.35 BDR Submittal Package Preliminary Plans (To be included as an appendix to the BDR) 1. General Notes Sheet(s) 2. Plan and Elevation Sheets 3. Construction Staging 4. Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheet 5. Superstructure Typical Section Sheets 6. Framing Plan 7. Substructure Section Sheets 8. Report of Core Borings 9. Preliminary Foundation Layouts 10. Wall Layout Sheets 11. Existing Bridge Plans — If available for Bridge Nos. 034056 and 034032 Preliminary Geotechnical investigations Report shall be included as part of the BDR preparation. 11 STRUCTURES - TEMPORARY BRIDGE - NA 12 STRUCTURES - SHORT SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for Short Span Concrete Bridge(s) at the location(s) specified in Section 2.5. General Layout Design and Plans 12.1 Overall Bridge Final Geometry 12.2 Expansion/Contraction Analysis 12.3 General Plan and Elevation 12.4 Construction Staging 12.5 Approach Slab Plan and Details 12.6 Miscellaneous Details End Bent Design and Plans 12.7 End Bent Geometry 12.8 End Bent Structural Design 12.9 End Bent Plan and Elevation 12.10 End Bent Details Intermediate Bent Design and Plans 12.11 Bent Geometry 12.12 Bent Stability Analysis 12.13 Bent Structural Design 12.14 Bent Plan and Elevation 12.15 Bent Details Miscellaneous Substructure Design and Plans 12.16 Foundation Layout Superstructure Design and Plans 12.17 Finish Grade Elevation Calculation 12.18 Finish Grade Elevations Cast -In -Place Slab Bridges 12.19 Bridge Deck Design 12.20 Superstructure Plan 12.21 Superstructure Sections and Details Prestressed Slab Unit Bridges 12.22 Prestressed Slab Unit Design 12.23 Prestressed Slab Unit Layout 12.24 Prestressed Slab Unit Details and Schedule 12.25 Deck Topping Reinforcing Layout 12.26 Superstructure Sections and Details Reinforcing Bar Lists 12.27 Preparation of Reinforcing Bar List Load Rating 12.28 Load Rating 13 STRUCTURES - MEDIUM SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for Medium Span Concrete Bridge(s) at the location(s) specified in Section 2.5. General Layout Design and Plans 13.1 Overall Bridge Final Geometry 13.2 Expansion/Contraction Analysis 13.3 General Plan and Elevation 13.4 Construction Staging 13.5 Approach Slab Plan and Details 13.6 Miscellaneous Details End Bent Design and Plans 13.7 End Bent Geometry 13.8 Wingwall Design and Geometry 13.9 End Bent Structural Design 13.10 End Bent Plan and Elevation 13.11 End Bent Details Intermediate Bent Design and Plans 13.12 Bent Geometry 13.13 Bent Stability Analysis 13.14 Bent Structural Design 13.15 Bent Plan and Elevation 13.16 Bent Details Pier Design and Plans 13.17 Pier Geometry 13.18 Pier Stability Analysis 13.19 Pier Structural Design 13.20 Pier Plan and Elevation 13.21 Pier Details Miscellaneous Substructure Design and Plans 13.22 Foundation Layout Superstructure Deck Design and Plans 13.23 Finish Grade Elevation (FGE) Calculation 13.24 Finish Grade Elevations 13.25 Bridge Deck Design 13.26 Bridge Deck Reinforcing and Concrete Quantities 13.27 Diaphragm Design 13.28 Superstructure Plan 13.29 Superstructure Section 13.30 Miscellaneous Superstructure Details Reinforcing Bar Lists 13.31 Preparation of Reinforcing Bar List Continuous Concrete Girder Design 13.32 Section Properties 13.33 Material Properties 13.34 Construction Sequence 13.35 Tendon Layouts 13.36 Live Load Analysis 13.37 Temperature Gradient 13.38 Time Dependent Analysis 13.39 Stress Summary 13.40 Ultimate Moments 13.41 Ultimate Shear 13.42 Construction Loading 13.43 Framing Plan 13.44 Girder Elevation, including Grouting Plan and Vent Locations 13.45 Girder Details 13.46 Erection Sequence 13.47 Splice Details 13.48 Girder Deflections and Camber Simple Span Concrete Design 13.49 Prestressed Beam 13.50 Prestressed Beam Schedules 13.51 Framing Plan Beam Stability 13.52 Beam/Girder Stability Bearing 13.53 Bearing Pad and Bearing Plate Design 13.54 Bearing Pad and Bearing Plate Details Load Rating 13.55 Load Ratings 14 STRUCTURES - STRUCTURAL STEEL BRIDGE — N/A 15 STRUCTURES - SEGMENTAL CONCRETE BRIDGE — N/A 16 STRUCTURES - MOVABLE SPAN — N/A 17 STRUCTURES - RETAINING WALLS — if required The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for Retaining Wall(s) as specified in Section 2.5. General Requirements 17.1 Key Sheet 17.2 Horizontal Wall Geometry Permanent Proprietary Walls 17.3 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.4 Semi -Standard Drawings 17.5 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 17.6 Details Temporary Proprietary Walls 17.7 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.8 Semi -Standard Drawings 17.9 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 17.10 Details Cast -In -Place Retaining Walls 17.11 Design 17.12 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.13 General Notes 17.14 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 17.15 Sections and Details 17.16 Reinforcing Bar List Other Retaining Walls and Bulkheads 17.17 Design 17.18 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.19 General Notes, Tables and Miscellaneous Details 17.20 Wall Plan and Elevations 17.21 Details 18 STRUCTURES -MISCELLANEOUS The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for Miscellaneous Structure(s) as specified in Section 2.5. Concrete Box Culverts 18.1 Concrete Box Culverts- 18.2 Concrete Box Culverts Extensions 18.3 Concrete Box Culvert Data Table Plan Sheets 18.4 Concrete Box Culvert Special Details Plan Sheets Strain Poles -NA 18.5 Steel Strain Poles 18.6 Concrete Strain Poles 18.7 Strain Pole Data Table Plan Sheets 18.8 Strain Pole Special Details Plan Sheets Mast Arms 18.9 Mast Arms - Includes design of FDOT standard mast arm assemblies per FDOT Index for each location identified under Activity 23. 18.10 Mast Arms Data Table Plan Sheets 18.11 Mast Arms Special Details Plan Sheets if required Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structure -NA 18.12 Cantilever Sign Structures 18.13 Overhead Span Sign Structures 18.14 Special (Long Span) Overhead Sign Structures 18.15 Monotube Overhead Sign Structure 18.16 Bridge Mounted Signs (Attached to Superstructure) 18.17 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structures Data Table Plan Sheets 18.18 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structures Special Details Plan Sheets High Mast Lighting -NA 18.19 Non -Standard High Mast Lighting Structures 18.20 High Mast Lighting Special Details Plan Sheets Noise Barrier Walls (Ground Mount) -NA 18.21 Horizontal Wall Geometry 18.22 Vertical Wall Geometry 18.23 Summary of Quantities — Aesthetic Requirements 18.24 Control Drawings 18.25 Design of Noise Barrier Walls Covered by Standards 18.26 Design of Noise Barrier Walls not Covered by Standards 18.27 Aesthetic Details Special Structures 18.28 Fender System 18.29 Fender System Access 18.30 Special Structures as needed 18.31 Other Structures -NA 18.32 Condition Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles -NA 18.33 Condition Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures and High Mast Light Poles (No As built or Design Plans Available) -NA 18.34 Analytical Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles- NA 18.35 Ancillary Structures Report -NA 19 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Signing and Pavement Markings Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 19.1 Traffic Data Analysis The CONSULTANT shall review the approved typical section package and proposed geometric design alignment to identify proposed sign placements and roadway markings. Perform queue analysis. 19.2 No Passing Zone Study — N/A 19.3 Reference and Master Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Signing & Marking Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 19.4 Multi -Post Sign Support Calculations The CONSULTANT shall determine the appropriate column size from the COUNTY's Multi - Post Sign Program(s). 19.5 Sign Panel Design Analysis Establish sign layout, letter size, and series for non-standard signs. 19.6 Sign Lighting/Electrical Calculations — N/A 19.7 Quantities 19.8 Cost Estimate 19.9 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 19.10 Other Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis 19.11 Field Reviews 19.12 Technical Meetings 19.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 19.14 Independent Peer Review 19.15 Supervision 19.16 Coordination 20 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Signing and Pavement Marking Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums that includes the following. 20.1 Key Sheet 20.2 Summary of Pay Items Including Quantity Input 20.3 Tabulation of Quantities 20.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 20.5 Project Layout 20.6 Plan Sheet 20.7 Typical Details 20.8 Guide Sign Work Sheet(s) 20.9 Traffic Monitoring Site — as required 20.10 Cross Sections 20.11 Special Service Point Details — as required 20.12 Special Details 20.13 Interim Standards 20.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications, and other services prepared as a part of the contract. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation, or it may be specifically designed for this project. 20.15 Supervision 21 SIGNALIZATION ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Signalization Analysis Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 21.1 Traffic Data Collection— as required The CONSULTANT shall perform all effort required for traffic data collection, including crash reports, 24 hr. machine counts, 8 hr. turning movement counts, 7-day machine counts, and speed & delay studies. 21.2 Traffic Data Analysis The CONSULTANT shall determine signal operation plan, intersection geometry, local signal timings, pre-emption phasing & timings, forecasting traffic, and intersection analysis run. 21.3 Signal Warrant Study- N/A 21.4 Systems Timings The CONSULTANT shall assist the COUNTY staff with determining proper coordination timing plans including splits, force offs, offsets, and preparation of Time Space Diagram. Timings will be performed by the COUNTY. 21.5 Reference and Master Signalization Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Signalization Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 21.6 Reference and Master Interconnect Communication Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Interconnect Communication Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 21.7 Overhead Street Name Sign Design The CONSULTANT shall design Signal Mounted Overhead Street Name signs. 21.8 Pole Elevation Analysis 21.9 Traffic Signal Operation Report — N/A 2 1. 10 Quantities 21.11 Cost Estimate 21.12 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall meet the latest version of the Collier County Signalization Technical Special Provisions. 21.13 Other Signalization Analysis The CONSULTANT is required to incorporate into the project the following elements: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Cameras (as necessary) — the specification for these devices can be found on Collier County's website at http://www.collier og v.net/your-govemment/divisions-s- z/traffic-operations/traffic-technical-special-provisions Vehicle Detection (Inductive loops); web address for these specifications is above. Queue Analysis — Determine auxiliary lanes capacity Any additional Technical Special Provisions (must be approved by Traffic Operations Engineers) 21.14 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall collect information from the maintaining agencies and conduct a field review. The review should include, but is not limited to, the following: Existing Signal and Pedestrian Phasing Controller Make, Model, Capabilities, and Condition/Age Condition of Signal Structure(s) Type of Detection as Compared with Current District Standards Interconnect Media Controller Timing Data 21.15 Technical Meetings 21.16 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications, and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The CONSULTANT may utilize the Quality Control Plan as part of their normal operation, or it may be specifically designed for this project. 21.17 Independent Peer Review 21.18 Supervision 21.19 Coordination 22 SIGNALIZATION PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Signalization Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums, which includes the following: 22.1 Key Sheet 22.2 Summary of Pay Items Including Designer Interface Quantity Input 22.3 Tabulation of Quantities 22.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 22.5 Plan Sheet 22.6 Interconnect Plans 22.7 Traffic Monitoring Site — as required 22.8 Guide Sign Worksheet 22.9 Special Details 22.10 Special Service Point Details — as required 22.11 Mast Arm/Monotube Tabulation Sheet 22.12 Strain Pole Schedule — N/A 22.13 TTCP Signal (Temporary) 22.14 Temporary Detection Sheet 22.15 Utility Conflict Sheet 22.16 Interim Standards 22.17 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications, and other services prepared as a part of the contract. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their regular operation, or it may be specifically designed for this project. 22.18 Supervision 23 LIGHTING ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Lighting Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 23.1 Lighting Justification Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Lighting Justification Report. The report shall be submitted under a separate cover with the 30% plans submittal, titled Lighting Justification Report. The report shall provide analyses for mainlines and arterial roads and shall include all backup data such that the report stands on its own. Back-up data shall include current ADTs, general crash data average cost from the Florida Highway Safety Improvement Manual, crash details data from the last three years, and preliminary lighting calculations. The report shall address warrants to determine if lighting warrants are met and shall include a benefit -cost analysis to determine if lighting is justified. The report shall include calculations for the night -to -day crash ratio as well as a table summarizing the day -time and the night-time crashes. The report shall follow the procedures outlined in the FDOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) manual, which utilize ADT, Three Year Crash Data, night/day crash ratio, percentage of night ADT, etc. 23.2 Lighting Design Analysis Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Lighting Design Analysis Report. The report shall be submitted under a separate cover with the 60% plans submittal. The report shall provide analyses for each signalized intersection lighting design and each typical section of the mainline and arterial roads. Each lighting calculation shall be properly identified as to the area that it covers. The report shall include the Lighting Design Criteria that will be used. For projects with corridor lighting, the report shall include the evaluation of at least three lighting design alternatives. The report shall provide a recommendation on the alternative to use. Each alternative shall be properly described; the alternatives shall consider different pole heights, lamp wattage, and arm lengths. Each alternative shall be provided with a cost estimate that includes initial cost in addition to operations and maintenance cost for one year. After approval of the preliminary report, the CONSULTANT shall submit a revised report for each submittal. The Lighting Design Analysis Report shall include: Lighting Calculations Structural calculations for special conventional pole concrete foundations if required Letter to the power company requesting service Power company confirmation letter on the requested services Voltage drop calculations Load analysis calculations for each branch circuit 23.3 Voltage Drop Calculations The CONSULTANT shall submit voltage drop calculations showing the equation or equations used along with the number of luminaries per circuit, the length of each circuit, the size conductor or conductors used and their ohm resistance values. The voltage drop incurred on each circuit (total volts and percentage of drop) shall be calculated, and all work necessary to calculate the voltage drop values for each circuit should be presented in such a manner as to be duplicated by the COUNTY. The Voltage Drop Calculations shall be submitted as part of the Lighting Design Analysis Report. 23.4 FDEP Coordination and Report — N/A 23.5 Reference and Master Design Files The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Lighting Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 23.6 Temporary Lighting — N/A, by the CONTRACTOR, if required 23.7 Design Documentation - N/A; included in LDAR 23.8 Quantities 23.9 Cost Estimate 23.10 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 23.11 Other Lighting Analysis — N/A 23.12 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall collect information from the maintaining agencies and conduct a field review. The review should include but is not limited to the following: Existing Lighting Equipment Load Center, Capabilities, and Condition/Age Condition of Lighting Structure(s) Verification of horizontal clearances Verification of breakaway requirements 23.13 Technical Meetings 23.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 23.15 Independent Peer Review 23.16 Supervision 23.17 Coordination 24 LIGHTING PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Lighting Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 24.1 Key Sheet 24.2 Summary of Pay Item Sheet Including Designer Interface Quantity Input 24.3 Tabulation of Quantities 24.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 24.5 Pole Data, Legend & Criteria 24.6 Service Point Details 24.7 Project Layout 24.8 Plan Sheet 24.9 Special Details 24.10 Temporary Lighting Data and Details — N/A 24.11 Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets — N/A 24.12 Interim Standards — N/A 24.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications, and other services prepared as a part of the contract. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their regular operation, or it may be specifically designed for this project. 24.14 Supervision 25 LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Landscape Architecture Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 25.1 Data Collection All research required to collect data necessary to complete the initial design analysis. Includes identifying local ordinances and collection of other project data as defined in the "Collier County Best Management Practices for Landscape Design and Permitting within the Right -of -Way" (as approved by the Board September 28, 2016). 25.2 Site Inventory and Analysis for Proposed Landscape Includes identification of opportunities and constraints for the proposed landscape project based on existing site conditions. Identify available planting areas for nursery landscape material. Provide a summary of analysis. 25.2a Selective Clearing and Grubbing Site Inventory — (see 4.12) 25.2b Inventory and Analysis — (see 4.12) 25.2c Vegetation Disposition Plan- Mainline -N/A (see 4.12) 25.3 Planting Design — N/A 25.3a Conceptual Planting Design N/A 25.3b Final Planting Design — N/A 25.4 Irrigation Design — NA/ 25.4a Conceptual Irrigation Design N/A 25.4b Final Irrigation Design — N/A 25.5 Hardscape Design Landscape/Irrigation Plans are not included in this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT shall provide "base level of landscaping" in the roadway plans as follows: electrical and irrigation sleeving, clean median backfill with landscape quality soil, non -mountable Type F curbing and brick pavers at the median ends. Specification and references in "Landscape and Irrigation Specifications for Beautification Improvements" are found in the Collier County's Right of Way Manual. Plans will be reviewed by Collier County Landscape Design and Maintenance Staff. 25.6 Roll Plots Task includes any roll plots for the project to aid in developing plans (landscape opportunity, disposition, site inventory and analysis, etc.) 25.7 Cost Estimates 25.8 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 25.9 Inspection Services Services may include: on -site inspection, construction, observation, monitoring, supervision, and any reporting requirements. 25.10 Other Landscape Services — N/A 25.11 Outdoor Advertising — N/A 25.12 Field Reviews 25.13 Technical Meetings / Public Meetings 25.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 25.15 Independent Peer Review 25.16 Supervision 25.17 Project Coordination 25.18 Interdisciplinary Coordination 26 LANDSCAPE PLANS The CONSULTANT shall include landscape features as included in this scope of services on the roadway plan sheets and detail sheets 26.1 Key Sheet — N/A 26.2 Tabulation of Quantities and Plant Schedule — N/A 26.3 General Notes — N/A 26.4 Tree and Vegetation Protection and Relocation Plans and Tree Disposition Plans - N/A 26.5 Planting Plans for Linear Roadway Projects — N/A 26.6 Planting Plans (Interchanges and Toll Plazas) — N/A 26.7 Planting Details and Notes — N/A 26.8 Irrigation Plans for Linear Roadway Project — N/A 26.9 Irrigation Plans for Interchange and Toll Plazas — N/A 26.10 Irrigation Details and Notes — N/A 26.11 Hardscape Plans — N/A 26.12 Hardscape Details and Notes 26.13 Landscape Maintenance Plan — N/A 26.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 26.15 Supervision WA 0 EY11 RLTA The CONSULTANT shall perform survey tasks in accordance with all applicable statutes, manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memoranda. The CONSULTANT shall submit all survey notes and computations to document the surveys. All field survey work shall be recorded in approved media and submitted to the COUNTY. Field books submitted to the COUNTY must be of an approved type. The field books shall be certified by the surveyor in responsible charge of work being performed before the final product is submitted. The survey notes shall include documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or site visits. All like work (such as bench lines, reference points, etc.) shall be recorded contiguously. The COUNTY may not accept field survey radial locations of section corners, platted subdivision lot and block corners, alignment control points, alignment control reference points and certified section corner references. The COUNTY may instead require that these points be surveyed by true line, traverse or parallel offset or Global Positioning Systems (GPS) procedures 27.1 Horizontal Project Control (HPC) Establish or recover HPC, for the purpose of establishing horizontal control on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System or datum approved by the COUNTY Project Manager; may include primary or secondary control points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and preparation of forms. 27.2 Vertical Project Control (VPC) Establish or recover VPC, for the purpose of establishing vertical control on datum approved by the COUNTY Project Manager; may include primary or secondary vertical control points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and preparation of forms. 27.3 Alignment and/or Existing Right of Way (R/W) Lines Establish, recover or re-establish project alignment. Also includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports for identifying mainline, offset, or secondary alignments. Depict alignment and/or existing R/W lines (in required format) per COUNTY R/W Maps, platted or dedicated rights of way. 27.4 Aerial Targets- NA Place, locate, and maintain required aerial targets and/or photo identifiable points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. Placement of the targets will be at the discretion of the aerial firm. 27.5 Reference Points Reference Horizontal Project Control (HPC) points, project alignment, vertical control points, section, 1/4 section, center of section corners and General Land Office (G.L.O.) corners as required. 27.6 Topography/Digital Terrain Model (DTM) (3D) -NA Locate all above ground features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data for the purpose of creating a DTM with sufficient density. Shoot all break lines, high and low points. Effort includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.7 Planimetric (2D) Locate all above ground features and improvements. Deliver in appropriate electronic format. Effort includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.8 Roadway Cross Sections/Profiles-NA Perform cross sections or profiles. May include analysis and processing of all field -collected data for comparison with DTM. 27.9 Side Street Surveys Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 27.10 Underground Utilities Designation includes 2-dimensional collection of existing utilities and selected 3-dimensional verification as needed for designation. Location includes non-destructive excavation to determine size, type and location of existing utility, as necessary for final 3-dimensional verification. Survey includes collection of data on points as needed for designates and locates. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and delivery of all appropriate electronic files. The CONSULTANT shall SUE all locations that include new underground infrastructure or earthwork excavation (i.e. drilled shafts, bridge piles, strain poles, mast arms, miscellaneous foundations, drainage structures, pipe culverts, new ditches, etc.). The expectation is for the CONSULTANT to know exactly where all existing underground utilities and infrastructure are located in areas that work will be performed to properly design for any new underground infrastructure or earthwork excavation that will be constructed on the project. The CONSULTANT's approach to practicing SUE shall be consistent with the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Standard (Cl/ASCE 38-02) entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data" as follows: •Identify utility owners that have facilities on, or may be affected by, the project limits. Contact these utility owners (face to face meetings recommended) and provide them with information about the proposed project and schedule periodic follow-up meetings. (ASCE Quality Level D). -Review all information that can be obtained and plot on utility composite drawing (CADD file to be furnished). (ASCE Quality Level D). -Make field observations to identify visible above -ground utility features. Provide all information in field sketches so surveyor can prepare a complete survey and plot a rectilinear grid. (ASCE Quality Level C) -Use appropriate surface geophysical methods (i.e., pipe and cable locators, terrain conductivity methods, resistively measurements, metal detectors, Ground Penetrating Radar, etc.) to designate existing subsurface utilities or to trace a particular utility system. This provides two-dimensional horizontal information. Place paint marks on the ground. Place identification flags or stakes on the paint marks or coding on the pavement and survey to project controls. Depict resulting information via computer aided design and drafting (CADD). Provide notes and sketches to designer of record and/or on -site engineer. Non-tonable (non-metallic) utilities will be discussed at this time with the designer of record and/or on -site engineer. (ASCE Quality Level B). -Meet with designer of record and/or on -site engineer to determine utility conflicts and ASCE Quality Level A test hole locations. -Expose selected subsurface utilities to obtain three-dimensional information. Use minimally intrusive excavation methods, such as vacuum excavation and Air -Lance. Depict resulting information. Resolve differences between all information gathered. Provide test hole data sheets (THDS) to designer of record and/or on -site engineer. All test holes are to be back -filled as described below. (ASCE Quality Level A). On completion, test holes shall be restored to the following: a. Backfilled with in -kind material b. Placed backfill using proper techniques c. Restored pavement with in -kind material d. Restored areas outside of pavement to pre -excavation conditions -Collect and store utility location and condition information in a database for asset management. Provide a detailed report of utility locations, depths, size, type, etc. All information shall be provided in the format preapproved by the COUNTY. 27.11 Outfall Survey Locate all above ground features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data for the purpose of a DTM. Survey with sufficient density of shots. Shoot all break lines, high and low points. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.12 Drainage Survey Locate underground data (XYZ, pipe size, type, condition and flow line) that relates to above ground data. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.13 Bridge Survey (Minor/Major) Locate required above ground features and improvements for the limits of the bridge. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.14 Channel Survey Locate all topographic features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, maps, and/or reports. 27.15 Pond Site Survey Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 27.16 Mitigation Survey -NA Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 27.17 Jurisdiction Line Survey -NA Perform field location (2-dimensional) of jurisdiction limits as defined by respective authorities, also includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, preparation of reports. 27.18 Geotechnical Support Perform 3-dimensional (X,Y,Z) field location, or stakeout, of boring sites established by geotechnical engineer. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data and/or reports. 27.19 Sectional/Grant Survey -NA Perform field location/placement of section corners, 1/4 section corners, and fractional corners where pertinent. Includes analysis and processing of all field -collected data and/or reports. 27.20 Subdivision Location — N/A 27.21 Maintained R/W Perform field location (2-dimensional) of maintained R/W limits as defined by respective authorities, if needed. Also includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, preparation of reports. 27.22 Boundary Survey Perform boundary survey as defined by FDOT and COUNTY standards. Includes analysis and processing of all field -collected data, preparation of reports. 27.23 Water Boundary Survey Perform Mean High Water, Ordinary High Water and Safe Upland Line surveys as required by FDOT and COUNTY standards. 27.24 Right of Way Staking, Parcel / Right of Way Line Perform field staking and calculations of existing/proposed R/W lines for on -site review purposes. 27.25 Right of Way Monumentation Set R/W monumentation as depicted on final R/W maps for corridor and water retention areas. 27.26 Line Cutting Perform all efforts required to clear vegetation from the line of sight. 27.27 Work Zone Safety Provide work zone as required by FDOT standards. 27.28 Vegetation Survey Locate vegetation within the project limits. 27.29 Tree Survey Locate individual trees or palms within the project limits. 27.30 Miscellaneous Surveys Refer to tasks of this document, as applicable, to perform surveys not described herein. The percent for Supplemental will be determined at negotiations. This item can only be used if authorized in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. 27.31 Supplemental Surveys Supplemental survey days and hours are to be approved in advance by COUNTY Project Manager. Refer to tasks of this document, as applicable, to perform surveys not described herein. 27.32 Document Research Perform research of documentation to support field and office efforts involving surveying and mapping. 27.33 Field Review Perform verification of the field conditions as related to the collected survey data. 27.34 Technical Meetings Attend meetings as required and negotiated by the Surveying and Mapping COUNTY. 27.35 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Establish and implement a QA/QC plan. Also includes subconsultant review, response to comments and any resolution meetings if required, preparation of submittals for review, etc. 27.36 Supervision Perform all activities required to supervise and coordinate project. These activities must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. or their delegate as approved by the COUNTY Project Manager. 27.37 Coordination Coordinate survey activities with other disciplines. These activities must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. or their delegate as approved by the COUNTY Project Manager. 28 PHOTOGRAMMETRY-NA 29 MAPPING The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the preparation of control survey maps, right of way maps, maintenance maps, sketches, other miscellaneous survey maps, and legal descriptions as required for this project in accordance with all applicable COUNTY Manuals, Procedures, Handbooks, District specific requirements, and Florida Statutes. All maps, surveys and legal descriptions will be prepared under the direction of a Florida Professional Surveyor and Mapper (PSM) to COUNTY size and format requirements utilizing COUNTY approved software and will be designed to provide a high degree of uniformity and maximum readability. The CONSULTANT will submit maps, legal descriptions, quality assurance check prints, checklists, electronic media files and any other documents as required for this project to the COUNTY for review at stages of completion as negotiated. Master CADD File 29.1 Alignment 29.2 Section and 1/4 Section Lines 29.3 Subdivisions / Property Lines 29.4 Existing Right of Way 29.5 Topography 29.6 Parent Tract Properties and Existing Easements 29.7 Proposed Right of Way Requirements The ENGINEER OF RECORD (EOR) will provide the proposed requirements. The PSM is responsible for calculating the final geometry. Notification of Final Right of Way Requirements along with the purpose and duration of all easements will be specified in writing. 29.8 Limits of Construction The limits of construction DGN file as provided by the FOR will be imported or referenced to the master CADD file. Additional labeling will be added as required. The PSM is required to advise the FOR of any noted discrepancies between the limits of construction line and the existing/proposed right of way lines, and for making adjustments as needed when a resolution is determined. 29.9 Jurisdictional/Agency Lines These lines may include, but are not limited to, jurisdictional, wetland, water boundaries, and COUNTY limit lines. Sheet Files 29.10 Control Survey Cover Sheet 29.11 Control Survey Key Sheet 29.12 Control Survey Detail Sheet 29.13 Right of Way Map Cover Sheet 29.14 Right of Way Map Key Sheet 29.15 Right of Way Map Detail Sheet 29.16 Maintenance Map Cover Sheet 29.17 Maintenance Map Key Sheet 29.18 Maintenance Map Detail Sheet 29.19 Reference Point Sheet This sheet(s) will be included with the Control Survey Map, Right of Way Map and Maintenance Map. 29.20 Project Control Sheet This sheet depicts the baseline, the benchmarks, the primary and secondary control points and their reference points including the type of material used for each point, their XYZ coordinates, scale factors and convergence angles. This sheet(s) may be included with the Control Survey Map, Right of Way Map and Maintenance Map. 29.21 Table of Ownerships Sheet Miscellaneous Surveys and Sketches 29.22 Parcel Sketches 29.23 TIITF Sketches 29.24 Other Specific Purpose Survey(s) 29.25 Boundary Survey(s) Map 29.26 Right of Way Monumentation Map 29.27 Title Search Map 29.28 Title Search Report 29.29 Legal Descriptions 29.30 Final Map/Plans Comparison The PSM will perform a comparison of the final right of way maps with the available construction plans to review the correctness of the type of parcel to be acquired and the stations/offsets to the required right of way. The PSM will coordinate with the FOR to resolve any conflicts or discrepancies and provide documentation of the review. 29.31 Field Reviews 29.32 Technical Meetings 29.33 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 29.34 Supervision 29.35 Coordination 29.36 Supplemental Mapping This task is to cover efforts resulting from major design and/or development changes after 60% map development that affect the right of way requirements/parent tract property lines and may include any number of tasks. Request and approval to utilize the Supplemental Mapping hours will be in writing and approved by the COUNTY Project Manager prior to any work being done under this task. 30 TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LIDAR — N/A The CONSULTANT shall perform Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR tasks in accordance with all applicable statutes, manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memoranda. In addition to the maps and LiDAR products, the CONSULTANT shall submit all computations and reports to support the mapping. This will include documentation of all decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations, and site visits. 30.1 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Mission Planning Research and prepare materials necessary for the successful execution of the Mobile LiDAR Mission. This includes but is not limited to route and safety planning, GPS /data acquisition scheduling, weather reports, and site terrain research. 30.2 Project Control Point Coordination All efforts necessary to coordinate the proper placement of project ground control i.e. base stations, transformation control points, and validation points, supporting the Mobile LiDAR survey. 30.3 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Mobilization Prepare the LiDAR sensor and vehicle for project data collection and get specialized personnel and equipment on site. 30.4 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Mission Perform site calibrations of LiDAR sensor and collect laser survey data, including any simultaneous base station GPS occupations and operation of any necessary safety equipment. 30.5 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Processing Download and post process collected measurement data from Mobile LiDAR vehicle sensors, and any base stations occupied during mission. Analyze Mobile LiDAR measurement points and scan route overlaps. Separate any large point cloud data sets into manageable file sizes with corresponding indexes. 30.6 Terrestrial Mobile Photography Processing Process, reference, and name digital photographic imagery files collected during Mobile LiDAR mission. 30.7 Transformation / Adjustment Adjust LiDAR point cloud data to Project Control points. Create point cloud data file(s) in approved digital format. Prepare required reports of precision and accuracy achieved. If this task is performed by separate firm, or is the final product to be delivered, include effort for Survey Report. 30.8 Classification / Editing Identify and attribute (classify) point cloud data into requested groups. Classify or remove erroneous points. 30.9 Specific Surface Reporting Prepare reports, data and/or graphics of specific surface details such as, but not limited to pavement rutting, bridge structure clearance to roadway surface. 3 0. 10 Topographic (3D) Mapping Produce three dimensional (3D) topographic survey map(s) from collected Mobile LiDAR data. This includes final preparation of Construction Information Management (CIM) deliverable, if applicable. 30.11 Topographic (2D) Planimetric Mapping Produce two dimensional (2D) planimetric map(s) from collected Mobile LiDAR data. 30.12 CADD Edits Perform final edit of graphics for delivery of required CADD files. This includes final presentation of CIM deliverable, if applicable. 30.13 Data Merging Merge Mobile LiDAR survey and mapping files, with other field survey files, and data from other sources. 30.14 Miscellaneous Other tasks not specifically addressed in this document. 30.15 Field Reviews Perform on site review of maps. 30.16 Technical Meetings Attend meetings as required. 30.17 Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Establish and implement a QA/QC plan. 30.18 Supervision Supervise all Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR activities. This task must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. 30.19 Coordination Coordinate with all elements of the project to produce a final product. 31 ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT — N/A 32 NOISE BARRIERS IMPACT DESIGN ASSESSMENT IN THE DESIGN PHASE -NA If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the County, scope and fee will be negotiated at that time and will be implemented via Change Order. When applicable, the staff hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. The noise analysis shall be performed in accordance with the FDOT's Noise Policy (Part 2, Chapter 17 of the FDOT's PD&E Manual) and the FDOT's Traffic Noise Modeling and Analysis Guidelines. The noise analysis and noise abatement evaluation shall be performed by or supervised/reviewed by a person(s) who has attended the FDOT's Traffic Noise Analysis training course or has attended and successfully completed the National Highway Institute's Highway Traffic Noise Course (FHWA-NHI-142051). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) approved noise model, the Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Version 2.5 (or most current version) shall be used for the noise analysis, unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY. 32.1 Noise Analysis 32.2 Noise Barrier Evaluation The CONSULTANT will present the data along with recommendations to the COUNTY for selection of the noise barrier's locations, barriers heights and lengths to be incorporated into the design plans. These recommendations shall consider the noise barrier feasibility and reasonableness. An evaluation of proposed noise barriers will be performed to identify any engineering conflicts or constraints. The CONSULTANT will be responsible for documenting any resolutions to engineering conflicts or issues that require modification to or preclude construction of a noise barrier. At a minimum, the engineering review will consider the following: Right of way needs including access rights (air, light, view, ingress/egress, outdoor advertising conflicts) Limited access issues Necessary construction and maintenance easements Safety issues (e.g., line of sight) Maintenance issues Structural and vegetative restrictions within easement Utility conflicts Drainage issues Environmental issues Other criteria as applicable The CONSULTANT shall re -analyze noise barrier(s) for feasibility and reasonableness and re- establish barrier height and length if design constraints require alteration in a barrier's location or dimensions. After reestablishing the recommended height and length of the barrier(s), the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with design engineers, the COUNTY Project Manager District Planning and the Environmental Office to include the barrier(s) on the design plans. In addition, the CONSULTANT will present a memo to the COUNTY Project Manager and FDOT containing a recommendation for selection of the barrier height and length to be carried forward for public input. This recommendation shall consider amount of noise reduction provided, engineering constraints and cost (reasonableness). In addition, the CONSULTANT will also consider the overall visual appearance in relation to the existing and proposed site conditions. This includes smoothing the profile along the top of a noise barrier to the extent possible while minimizing any loss in the amount of noise reduction provided and extending the ends of a noise barrier to cover additional receivers. Extending the ends of a noise barrier will not exceed the cost criteria and will only be performed when it is appropriate and in the public interest. 32.3 Public Involvement If noise barriers are determined to be feasible and cost reasonable, the CONSULTANT shall carry out the public involvement and surveys necessary to report to the COUNTY whether or not the majority of the impacted and/or benefited receptors desire the construction of a noise barrier. Input shall also be obtained from the public regarding barrier aesthetics (color and texture) on one or both sides of the barrier. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordinating with local government officials. a minimum, the following tasks shall be completed by the CONSULTANT for public involvement purposes: Identification of impacted and/or benefited property owners Identification of renters and non -residing property owners (for a property that may be rented) Preparation of a mailing list (property owners, renters and non -residing property owners) Preparation of a summary package (including an information letter, aerial showing the noise barrier location and a survey form to document the recipient's position to be sent to property owners, and occupants/non-residing property owners informing them of the proposed noise barrier If necessary, preparation of additional mailings and/or door-to-door/telephone surveys until a majority decision is obtained or until directed by the District Noise Specialist and the COUNTY Project Manager Tallying of survey results Noise barrier aesthetics coordination Public meetings coordination (including arranging the meeting location, advertisements, displays, etc.) Responding to public inquiries on an individual basis in coordination with the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall bring to the attention of the COUNTY unforeseen conditions and issues which are relevant to the project decision. Other than noise barrier length, height and location, the CONSULTANT shall abstain from indicating preferences for any of the barrier options prior to or during contact with the property owners unless specifically requested to do so by the COUNTY. Following the public involvement process, the CONSULTANT shall produce a final noise barrier recommendation that identifies the starting and ending points for all noise barriers, the top elevation(s), and the aesthetic elements to be provided (e.g. — color, texture, graphics). 32.4 Outdoor Advertising Identification The CONSULTANT shall identify potential noise barriers that may block the view of an existing lawfully erected sign that is governed by and conforms to state and federal requirements for land use, size, height and spacing consistent with the requirements of Florida Statute (FS) 479.25 and the FDOT Noise Policy (Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual). The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY's Project Manager of a potential noise barrier(s) that may affect the visibility of a legally permitted outdoor advertising sign. Resolution of the potential conflict shall be documented in the NSR and included in the environmental document. 32.5 Noise Study Report (NSR) Addendum The results of noise barrier evaluations performed by the CONSULTANT shall be documented in the NSR Addendum (in accordance with Chapter 264 of the FDOT Design Manual (FDM)) and shall include the results of the computer modeling (electronically), public involvement activities and final noise abatement commitments. 32.6 Technical Meetings Prior to proceeding with the noise barrier analysis, the CONSULTANT shall discuss and coordinate with the appropriate District Environrental Management Office staff and the COUNTY Project Manager. The purpose of this discussion will be for the COUNTY to provide the CONSULTANT with all pertinent project information and to confirm the methodologies to be used to conduct the noise analysis. This meeting is mandatory and should occur after the Notice to Proceed is given to the CONSULTANT. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to undertake the necessary action (i.e. phone calls, meetings, correspondence, etc. to ensure that COUNTY Project Manager and the District Environmental Management Office staff is kept informed of the noise analysis efforts so that these tasks are accomplished in a manner that will enhance the overall success of the project. 32.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control QA/QC reviews will be performed for all NSR Addendums submitted to the COUNTY. Documentation of the QA/QC will be provided to the District Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that the noise barrier(s) location(s), length, height and aesthetics as shown on the final design plans are consistent with the results of the noise barrier evaluation and recommendation documented in the original NSR and/or the NSR Addendum. 32.8 Supervision 32.9 Coordination 33 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Intelligent Transportations System (ITS) Analysis Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, existing ITS standard operating procedures, strategic plans, Florida's SEMP guidelines, National and regional ITS architectures, and current design memoranda. ITS work includes the application of sensor, computer, electronics and communication technologies and management strategies, in an integrated manner, to improve the safety and efficiency of the surface transportation system. ITS includes, but is not limited to, Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS), Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS), Advanced Rural Transportation Systems (ARTS), Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS), Advanced Highway Systems (AHS), Commercial Vehicle Operation (CVO) and Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) Systems. In instances where the CONSULTANT performs analysis or prepares the design packages for the deployment of ITS, the CONSULTANT will not be allowed to compete as a proposing firm or participate as a subconsultant to a proposing firm during subsequent advertisements involving work performed under this contract. 33.1 ITS Analysis The CONSULTANT shall review the approved preliminary engineering report, typical section package, traffic technical memorandum and proposed geometric design alignment to identify impacts to existing ITS components (if applicable) and proposed ITS field device placements. The CONSULTANT shall review all related District ITS plans and documentation for the project corridor to ensure all cited ITS elements are included in this project, and develop a Concept of Operations (ConOps), Project Systems Engineering Management Plan (PSEMP), RTVM, and other documents as necessary for conformance with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements. The CONSULTANT shall use applicable COUNTY and FDOT requirements and guidelines, including, but not limited to, the FDM, Standard Plans, and Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction in the design of ITS. CCTV camera system shall provide 100 percent coverage of all mainline lanes, entrance and exit ramps, interchanges (includes view of crossing arterials), blind spots (such as those caused due to existing and proposed bridges, existing and proposed signage, vegetation, and horizontal and vertical curvatures). Cameras shall be spaced to meet the Project requirements, guidance from the ConOps, and as approved by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall provide a recommendation for additional CCTV cameras to extend coverage for the extent of the project limits. Vehicle detection devices shall be spaced as required to meet the Project requirements (speed, volume, and occupancy detection), guidance from the ConOps and as approved by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall review the existing TMC Operations and develop additional incident management service requirements as necessary to support during the Construction Phase of the Project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY and the District's Traffic Operations ITS Office for additional information regarding existing Incident Management and TMC Operational Procedures (If desired by the COUNTY or District). All ITS devices shall be compatible with the latest version of the National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol (NTCIP) and compatible with SunGuide software platform. The CONSULTANT shall design the project such that all ITS field devices and ancillary components comply with FDOT's Approved Product List (APL) and are supported within the SunGuide software or other software approved by the COUNTY. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Camera Assembly. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design and exact field locations for the camera assemblies. The camera subsystem shall provide overlapping coverage to overcome visual blockage. Camera assemblies may include a camera lowering device (CLD). The camera subsystem shall be designed to provide additional benefits such as the monitoring of DMS operations and security surveillance of critical infrastructure elements. A stand-alone DMS confirmation camera shall be designed and installed to support TMC operations to verb and confirm the posted DMS messages (if desired by the COUNTY). The position, height, and design of each camera pole shall be finalized during the design phase of the project. Each site shall be designed for overall monitoring capability, as well as designed to provide safe and effective maintenance conditions. The camera assembly deployment shall be designed to provide fields of view that give the required corridor coverage. The CONSULTANT shall determine the camera location by performing a videography study at each proposed camera site. The study shall include video at the proposed camera location and elevation with respect to the roadway elevation. The CONSULTANT shall identify the final number and locations of the camera assemblies based on the videography study. The camera system design shall ensure that the video quality is not degraded due to wind or vibration. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the poles and foundations to minimize the potential for vibration. The CONSULTANT shall prepare cross section plan sheets showing details of horizontal and vertical clearances of the proposed equipment with identified utilities. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the grounding and lightning protection system based on FDOT criteria. The CCTV camera assembly shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Supplemental Specification 682. Vehicle Detection Subsystem The CONSULTANT shall select vehicle detection technology to meet the Project needs, ConOps requirements, and as approved by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of a non -intrusive vehicle detection subsystem for the roadway facilities. The detectors shall be positioned near other ITS field device infrastructure including the fiber-optic splice vaults when feasible to reduce cost. Final detection station locations shall be based on a number of location variables identified during the design phase. The vehicle detection subsystem shall collect and process volume, speed and occupancy data on a lane -by -lane basis for the corridor mainlines, in both directions of travel. The data will be used by the TMC for functions including detecting incidents, determining travel times, estimating traffic conditions for dissemination to travelers, sharing information with other agencies, and data archiving for transportation planning and historical data analysis. The vehicle detection subsystem shall allow for connectivity to the TMC. Vehicle detectors must meet the Project requirements under all environmental and traffic conditions expected for the corridors. The detection system shall produce accurate volume, speed and occupancy data for all corridor traffic operation conditions. The CONSULTANT design must limit the likelihood of occlusions, other blocking of vehicles and adjacent lanes detection that degrade the detection system performance below specified accuracy. Design the system so that signs, walls, guardrails, and other physical elements do not degrade detection performance. The system shall allow remote configuration, calibration, monitoring, and diagnostic of real-time traffic activities from a remote location, such as the TMC, using the FDOT SunGuide central software and software provided by the detection system vendor. The CONSULTANT shall determine the exact location of the field devices to meet the desired coverage and functional requirements of vehicle detectors. The detector and associated cabinet locations shall be identified by the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will coordinate and perform a detailed site survey with a factory trained and certified representative of the detection system manufacturer being proposed in their design. The site survey must confirm that the design does not exceed the operational capabilities of the proposed detection technology or device. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of a vehicle detection system that allows travel times to be automatically calculated for roadway facilities. The travel time system may utilize a variety of vehicle detection systems, including loop, video, microwave, wireless magnetometer, and Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) systems. The system shall utilize the project communications backbone in order to collect and distribute travel time data to the TMCs. When utilizing transponders, they will be read by AVI reader equipment placed at checkpoints along the roadway. As a transponder passes a checkpoint, its data shall be acquired by the AVI system. The AVI system shall automatically add the time, date, transponder reading antenna number, and the antenna location to the transponder identification code and store the data. Systems that rely upon transponders shall utilize supplemental toll tag readers placed at appropriate existing device locations as applicable, as well as interchanges and at intermediate locations throughout the project as required to provide the required coverage to satisfy travel time measurement requirements. Using the designed communications, the transponder information shall be forwarded to the TMC for further processing. The vehicle detection system utilized shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 660. Dynamic Message Sign Subsystem -NA The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the DMS subsystem for the roadway facilities. The position of each DMS shall be finalized during the design phase of the project. The CONSULTANT shall select DMS technology, type, and display to meet the Project requirements and ConOps requirements. The CONSULTANT shall locate the DMS to satisfy the required sign functionality and to provide the required visibility of the signs. The project communications system shall enable full control of the DMS from the TMC facilities. All DMS hardware, software and related infrastructure components shall be fully compatible with SunGuide software. All DMS shall include a dedicated confirmation camera that allows for visual verification of the messages posted on the DMS by a TMC Operator (if desired by the District). The CONSULTANT shall design support structures to accommodate the specified DMS to meet the design functional, operational, and maintenance requirements. The DMS shall be designed in accordance with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Supplemental Specification 700. All Highway Signing, including Dynamic Message Signs, shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 700. Roadway Weather Information Systems (RWIS)-NA The CONSULTANT shall develop Technical Special Provisions or Modified Special Provisions for RWIS based upon the unique needs of the project. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that, each RWIS site consists of a remote processing unit (RPU), communication hardware, and determine the site -specific components as required from below: Fog/Smoke Detection sensor; Classifying Precipitation; Precipitation Occurrence Sensor; Air Temperature/Relative Humidity Sensor; Wind Speed and Direction Sensor; RWIS Tower/Pole Structure, foundation, base, and cabinet with electrical service, and lightning protection & grounding assembly; and, Communication hardware. The RWIS subsystem shall include all hardware, software, and licenses to operate, including SQL database for the TMC and RWIS Central Hardware for TMC. 33.2 Communications The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the development of a communications plan to determine the optimal communications medium for the project corridor. The plan shall be developed prior to submittal of Phase I plans. The plan shall identify communications media alternatives and provide a cost estimate that includes initial, operations and maintenance cost for the life cycle of the communications network. The plan shall ensure that video, voice, and data will be communicated in real-time between center -to -field and center -to -center (C2C) nodes as applicable. The communications system design must utilize non-proprietary, open -architecture, standards -based, robust, scalable, and proven technology. The communication plan analysis shall address communication and connections between field devices, communications and connections between field devices and the TMC, center -to -center communications between TMCs, and any other communication links or connections required to meet project goals. The plan must include bandwidth analysis and recommendations, needs assessment, and provide recommendations regarding minimum requirements, media, network devices, protocols, network topology, communication redundancy, future needs, spare capacity, and any communications or data sharing with other agencies. After approval of the plan, the CONSULTANT shall submit a revised plan including a detailed design analysis for each submittal. The CONSULTANT's communications design shall include multiple redundant paths for each location, which allows for automatic switching of communications path onto a secondary path, if the primary path is impacted (if desired by the District). The communications system components shall be in accordance with Sections 630, 633, and 635 of the latest FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (online edition). 33.3 Grounding and Lightning Protection The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for a complete and reliable grounding and lightning protection design to provide personnel and equipment protection against faults, surge currents and lightning transients. The grounding and lightning protection system shall be designed in accordance with the latest version of the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 620. 33.4 Power Subsystem The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for an electrical design in accordance with all NEC requirements. No solar power should be utilized as a power solution for the Project unless otherwise approved by the COUNTY. To enhance power reliability, the CONSULTANT shall design a power distribution and backup system consisting of, at a minimum, underground power conduits and conductors, transformers, generators, automatic transfer switches, UPS, and all associated equipment. The power backup system shall supply electrical power in event of commercial power supply failure for all system components. Power equipment shall be installed in areas to avoid wet locations. All connections and equipment shall be protected from moisture and water intrusion. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that vandal resistant mechanisms for all electrical infrastructure shall be included as part of the Design. The CONSULTANT shall submit the power system design and voltage drop calculations for the power distribution system as part of phase II, III, and IV design submittals. The CONSULTANT shall conduct a short circuit and protection coordination study for the designed power system and document the study as part of the power system design report. 33.5 Voltage Drop Calculations The electrical design shall address allowable voltage drops per the NEC. The CONSULTANT shall submit voltage drop calculations for any electrical circuit providing power to the ITS field devices beyond the electric utility service point. The calculations shall document the length of each circuit, its load, the size conductor or conductors used, and their ohm resistance values and the required voltages from the service point to the respective ITS devices to maintain voltage drops with allowable limits. The voltage drop incurred on each circuit (total volts and percentage of drop) shall be calculated, and all work necessary to calculate the voltage drop values for each circuit should be presented in such a manner as to be duplicated by the District. Load analysis calculations shall be submitted. All voltage drop calculations shall allow for future expansion of ITS infrastructure, if identified in the Project ConOps. 33.6 Design Documentation The CONSULTANT shall submit a Design Documentation Book with each plan submittal under separate cover and not part of the roadway documentation book. At a minimum, the design documentation book shall include: Computation books for all applicable items on plans. Phase submittal checklist. Three-way quantity check list Structural calculations for all structures Voltage drop calculations. Load analysis calculations. 33.7 Existing ITS The CONSULTANT shall research any required legacy system or system components that may be impacted by new work, such as: existing communications; existing types, numbers, locations, models, manufacturers, and age of ITS devices; as -built plans; existing operating software; existing center -to -field devices; and C2C communications and capabilities. 33.8 Queue Analysis The CONSULTANT shall perform a queue analysis at high volume interchanges and high frequency conflict / crash locations to determine optimal placement of DMS using project forecasted traffic volumes. This analysis shall be performed prior to submittal of the Phase I plans. The CONSULTANT shall perform other traffic engineering analysis as necessary to ensure that the DMS locations are selected based on optimum message delivery to the motorists. 33.9 Reference and Master ITS Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the ITS design file to include all necessary design elements and the reference files for topo, R/W roadway, utilities files, etc. This effort includes the design and layout of proposed ITS devices, including but not limited to: CCTV / Detection poles, DMS, detection devices, advanced traffic controllers, conduit, cabinet -related pull boxes, service points, fiber optic sizing, and communications hubs. All existing ITS infrastructure shall be referenced to the new ITS plan sheets (if applicable). 3 3. 10 Reference and Master Communications Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the communication design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files as well as reference files of topo, R/W, roadway, utilities files, existing ITS communications infrastructure, etc. This effort includes design and layout of proposed communications conduit, cabinet, pull boxes, splice boxes, standard route markers, communications plan overview, fiber optic splicing, connections, communications hubs, etc. 33.11 Pole Elevation Analysis The CONSULTANT shall evaluate pole elevation requirements and design pole heights to meet the Project requirements including field of view; elimination of occlusion; site access for maintenance vehicles and personnel; access to pole mounted equipment, such as CCTV cameras, traffic detectors, and cabinets; and probability of lightning strike. 33.12 Sign Panel Design Analysis The CONSULTANT shall design all ITS signing in conjunction with the Roadway Master Signing. This includes any static sign panel that includes changeable message elements. Arterial full size DMS shall not be co -located with other static signs. 33.13 Quantities The CONSULTANT shall include all work required to determine the quantities for all items, including ITS structures and devices, interconnect, and infrastructure (such as conduits, pull boxes, splice boxes, fusion splices, splice enclosures, etc.). This work effort shall include generating accurate quantities for computing the engineer's estimate as required by the District. Use digital submittal of plans as required by the COUNTY. 33.14 Cost Estimate The CONSULTANT shall prepare an engineer's cost estimate for the project using historical data from the FDOT or from other Industry sources. The CONSULTANT shall also load the pay items and quantities into AASHTOWare Project Preconstruction for generating the Summary of Pay Items and the FDOT's in-house estimates. 33.15 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall develop Technical Special Provisions (TSP) and Modified Special Provisions (MSP) for the specific items or conditions of the project that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard Specifications, Supplemental Specifications and Special Provisions. 33.16 Other ITS Analyses — N/A 33.17 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall conduct a field review for the required phase submittals. The review shall identify necessary data for all elements of the project including, but not limited to, the following: Existing ITS Field Devices as compared with the latest FDOT standards and COUNTY requirements Device Make, Model, Capabilities, Condition / Age, Existence of SunGuide Software Driver Condition of Structure(s), cabinets, and other above -ground infrastructure and devices Type of Detection as Compared with Current COUNTY Standards Underground Infrastructure Proximity of other utilities Traffic Operations Any other field reconnaissance as necessary to develop a complete ITS design package 33.18 Technical Meetings The CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as necessary support the project. 33.19 Quality Assurance / Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of designs, drawings, specifications, and other services and work furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications, and other documentation prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation or may be one specifically designed for this project. The CONSULTANT shall utilize the District's quality control checklist. The responsible Professional Engineer that performed the Quality Control review shall sign a statement certifying that the review was conducted. The CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct all errors or deficiencies in their works. 33.20 Supervision The CONSULTANT shall provide all efforts required to supervise all technical design activities. 33.21 Coordination The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with Survey, Geotech, Drainage, Structures, Lighting, Roadway Design, Utilities, municipalities, maintaining agencies and Traffic Operations to produce a final set of construction contract documents and to ensure that a high degree of accuracy for the design plans is achieved. 34 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of ITS Plans in accordance with the FDOT Design Manual that includes the following: 34.1 Key Sheet The CONSULTANT shall prepare the key sheet in accordance with the latest format depicted in the FDOT Design Manual, MUTCD, Standard Specs, and Standard Plans. 34.2 Summary of Pay Items Including Designer Interface Quantity Input The CONSULTANT shall include quantity input into Designer Interface and create the CADD generated sheet. 34.3 Tabulation of Quantities The CONSULTANT shall place pay item numbers, descriptions, quantities and grand totals on the tabulation sheet(s) and provide updating of the tabulation of quantities sheets during the design period. 34.4 General Notes / Pay Item Notes The CONSULTANT shall include all pertinent general notes and pay item notes as deemed fit and as established by the District. 34.5 Project Layout The CONSULTANT shall prepare plan sheet(s) with an overview of the entire project that include stations and offsets, project limits, intersection locations, devices, device identification using SunGuide nomenclature, and plan sheet coverage. 34.6 Typical and Special Details The CONSULTANT shall prepare typical and / or special details for conditions in the project not addressed by the COUNTY's Standard Plans for Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Utility Operations on the State Highway System. The CONSULTANT shall prepare special details not addressed by FDOT Standard Plans, including block diagrams, hub cabinets, wiring diagrams, solar power service, and special mounting details. 34.7 Plan Sheet The CONSULTANT shall prepare the ITS plan sheets utilizing the Design file to include all necessary information related to the project design elements and all associated reference files. The plan sheets shall include general and pay item notes and pay items. The plans shall depict the location of pull boxes, splice boxes, conduit runs and device locations with setbacks from the travel way. Devices shall be located by station and offset. 34.8 ITS Communications Plans The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for the communications network. These plans shall consist of block diagrams, splicing diagrams, port assignments, wiring diagrams, and all other information necessary to convey the design concept to the contractor. These plans shall be included in the ITS plan set and be prepared in a manner consistent with immediately adjacent ITS project installations (planned or installed). The communication system shall be an open -architecture, non-proprietary, real-time, multimedia communications network. The communication system design must be compatible and completely interoperable with the existing systems. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for preparing plans to preserve communications connectivity during construction The CONSULTANT's design shall include protecting and maintaining the existing ITS infrastructure. For locations where existing ITS infrastructure is impacted, the CONSULTANT's design shall include mitigation to minimize the downtime of existing system as per the District's requirements. The CONSULTANT is responsible for the design of the communication infrastructure and its integration with the COUNTY's communication system. Additionally, the CONSULTANT shall determine the most cost effective, best performing, communication connectivity option. The communication system must allow command and control as well as data and video transmission between the field devices and the TMC. Conduit paths shall be selected to provide a continuous duct system on one side of the road unless otherwise requested by the FDOT. The various components of ITS deployment will be located on both sides of the freeway and therefore under pavement bore and lateral conduits will be necessary to access equipment locations. The CONSULTANT shall produce fiber optic cable splicing diagrams to show the connectivity of the fiber optic cable from its termini at field devices to the TMC. The diagrams shall denote new and existing fiber routes, splices, and terminations involved in the work. The diagrams shall identify cables by size, tube color / number and stand colors / numbers. All cables shall be identified either by numbering system identified either by numbering system identified on the plans or by bounding devices. The diagrams shall denote the types of connectors in the patch panels. 34.9 Fiber Optic Splice Diagrams The CONSULTANT shall produce fiber optic cable splicing diagrams to show the connectivity of the fiber optic cable from its termini at field devices to the TMC. The diagrams shall denote new and existing fiber routes, splices, and terminations involved in the work. The diagrams shall identify cables by size, tube color / number and stand colors / numbers. All cables shall be identified either by numbering system identified either by numbering system identified on the plans or by bounding devices. The diagrams shall denote the types of connectors in the patch panels. 34.10 Grounding and Lightning Protection Plans The CONSULTANT shall include efforts to design a complete and reliable lightning protection design for each pole and associated devices, ITS device installation, as well as device cabinets and communications hubs, etc. if not already addressed in the FDOT's Standard Plans for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System. 34.11 Cross Sections The CONSULTANT shall prepare cross sections for ITS devices. 34.12 Guide Sign Work Sheet(s) The CONSULTANT shall prepare the guide sign work sheets to include all necessary information related to the design of the static and dynamic message signs in the project corridor. 34.13 Special Service Point Details The CONSULTANT shall design any special service point and electrical distribution system beyond the electric utility company's service point. The plan shall depict with pay items, general and plan notes the locations of transformers, switches, disconnects, conduits, pull boxes and power conductors. The plans shall identify the location of underground and overhead service points with identifying pole and transformer numbers. 34.14 Strain Pole Schedule The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the schedule detail chart for concrete or steel strain poles in the plan set. 34.15 Overhead / Cantilever Sign Structure For overhead truss and cantilever mounted devices, the CONSULTANT shall evaluate pertinent data and information to develop the layout for locating and mounting devices to the horizontal element of the structure and coordinate the design of the structures with the roadway and structural engineers. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for determining the overhead/cantilever structure requirements for proper installation of the DMS, viewing angle and site distance requirement as per Chapter 2e — Guide Signs -Freeways and Expressways in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Florida COUNTY of Transportation FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and all other applicable manuals and guidelines as per governing regulations. 34.16 Other Overhead Sign Structures (Long Span, Monotube, etc.) For other overhead sign structures, the CONSULTANT shall evaluate pertinent data and information to develop layout for locating and mounting device to the horizontal element of the structure and coordinate the design of the structures with the roadway and structural engineers. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for determining the requirements for other type of structures (long span, monotube, etc.) used as part of the project for proper installation of the DMS, viewing angle and site distance requirement as per Chapter 2e — Guide Signs -Freeways and Expressways in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Florida COUNTY of Transportation FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and all other applicable manuals and guidelines as per governing regulations. 34.17 Temporary Traffic Control Plans The CONSULTANT shall prepare Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCP) to minimize impact to traffic during the construction of ITS field devices and associated communications infrastructure that will be deployed along the project corridor. The TTCP shall strive to maintain and sustain center -to -field device connectivity and operability to the ITS field devices previously deployed along the project corridor. The TTCP effort shall consider and mitigate the impacts of the project's various construction phases so as to sustain center -to -field devices connectivity and operability, maintaining operational quality as a minimum at the level provided prior to construction start and minimizing down time as much as possible. The CONSULTANT shall develop the TTCP sheets for the project, providing temporary communications as necessary, notes, details, and direction applicable to the ITS elements and associated communications for inclusion in the TTCP. The CONSULTANT shall review the existing TMC Operations and develop additional incident management service requirements as necessary to support during the Construction Phase of the Project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with District's Traffic Operations ITS Office for additional information regarding existing Incident Management and TMC Operational Procedures. 34.18 Interim Standards The CONSULTANT shall adhere to all COUNTY's Interim Standards for ITS applications. 34.19 GIS Data and Asset Management Requirements The CONSULTANT is responsible for providing Geographic Information System (GIS), spatial data, for the ITS components design. This information is required to integrate ITS components to the SunGuide software. A coordinate point compatible with the Florida State Plane System or FDOT's current coordinate plane system shall be collected for all ITS components part of the Project design. All GIS information provided shall be compatible with the FDOT's ITS FM asset management software. The information shall be transferred to the as -built plans and submitted to the COUNTY in electronic format along with the as -built plans. The Global Positioning System (GPS) unit shall be provided by the CONSULTANT and used to collect data with a minimum accuracy of three (3) meters when differentially corrected. The CONSULTANT shall collect spatial data points and physical address location for: DMS location (mainline and arterial) Vehicle detection pole location CCTV camera pole location Ground mounted cabinets Fiber optic cable path (fiber backbone) Communications hubs Standard route markers Lateral fiber optic cable connections Lateral power cable connections Pull boxes (power and fiber) Splice boxes Power drops (service point and cable path) 34.20 Quality Assurance / Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall utilize the District's quality control checklist for traffic design drawings in addition to the QC effort described in section three. 35 GEOTECHNICAL The CONSULTANT shall, for each project, be responsible for a complete geotechnical investigation. All work performed by the CONSULTANT shall be in accordance with COUNTY standards, or as otherwise directed by the District Geotechnical Engineer. The District Geotechnical Engineer will make interpretations and changes regarding geotechnical standards, policies and procedures and provide guidance to the CONSULTANT. Before beginning each phase of investigation and after the Notice to Proceed is given, the CONSULTANT shall submit an investigation plan for approval and meet with the COUNTY Project Manager to review the project scope and FDOT and COUNTY requirements. The investigation plan shall include, but not be limited to, the proposed boring locations and depths, and all existing geotechnical information from available sources to generally describe the surface and subsurface conditions of the project site. Additional meetings may be required to plan any additional field efforts, review plans, resolve plans/report comments, resolve responses to comments, and/or any other meetings necessary to facilitate the project. The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY in adequate time to schedule a representative to attend all related meetings and field activities. A subsoil investigation plan shall be submitted to the COUNTY for approval prior to site investigation. Muck and cap rock conditions are typical to Southwest Florida. Not encountering muck and cap rock is outside the norm in Collier County. The presence of both must be identified and quantified in the soils report for the project. To do this may require additional hand holes in muck and deeper drill holes to penetrate the cap rock and identify the soil layers below than was originally shown in the investigation plan. The Soils Report shall contain a signed statement by the Geotechnical Engineer that they have walked the project site and verified to the best of their ability that information provided in the report is representative of what the surface conditions and vegetation suggest would exist below. Where cap rock is expected to be encountered in the installation of stormwater pipe and other structures, the pay items "Rock Trench Excavation" and "muck removal" (if encountered) shall be provided. All Geotechnical work shall meet the minimum requirements of the FDOT Soils and Foundations Handbook. 35.1 Document Collection and Review CONSULTANT will review printed literature including topographic maps, COUNTY agricultural maps, aerial photography (including historic photos), ground water resources, geology bulletins, potentiometric maps, pile driving records, historic construction records and other geotechnical related resources. Prior to field reconnaissance, CONSULTANT shall review U.S.G.S., S.C.S. and potentiometric maps, and identify areas with problematic soil and groundwater conditions. The CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing including but not limited to the following: 0 Roadway auger borings every 100 feet to a depth of 6 feet. ■ LBR sampling and testing at 3 per mile. ■ Pavement core sampling and testing at 1 sample per 1,000 feet. ■ Corrosion series testing at sample per abundant stratum per 1,000 feet ■ Buried storm sewer system SPT borings to a depth of 20 feet every 500 feet ■ SPT borings on all corners of intersection for all new signals and/or mast arm to a depth of 25 feet. ■ Two corrosion series tests at each intersection location ■ Two SPT borings to a depth of 25 feet at each wet detention pond location ■ Two borehole permeability tests at each wet detention pond location ■ Piezometer installations at 1 per pond for Seasonal High Groundwater Level (SHGWL) determinations ■ Exfiltration test per 500 feet of exfiltration trench If required by the COUNTY Project Manager, a preliminary roadway exploration shall be performed before the 30% plans submittal. The preliminary roadway exploration will be performed, and results provided to the Engineer of Record to assist in setting roadway grades and locating potential problem areas. The preliminary roadway exploration shall be performed as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing as required by project needs and as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. All laboratory testing and classification will be performed in accordance with applicable FDOT standards, ASTM Standards or AASHTO Standards, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. 35.2 Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan Develop a detailed boring location plan. Meet with COUNTY Project Manager for boring plan approval. If the drilling program expects to encounter artesian conditions, the CONSULTANT shall submit a methodology(s) for plugging the borehole to the COUNTY for approval prior to commencing with the boring program. 35.3 Stake Borings/Utility Clearance Stake borings and obtain utility clearance. Perform two corrosion series tests at each intersection location. 35.4 Muck Probing Probe standing water and surficial muck in a detailed pattern sufficient for determining removal limits to be shown in the Plans. 35.5 Coordinate and Develop TTCP for Field Investigation Coordinate and develop Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP). All work zone traffic control will be performed in accordance with the FDOT's Standard Plans Index 102 series. 35.6 Drilling Access Permits Obtain all State, COUNTY, and Water Management District permits for performing geotechnical borings, as needed. 35.7 Property Clearances Notify property tenants in person of drilling and field activities, if applicable. Written notification to property owners/tenants is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for assembling a list of all property owners where access is required for conducting geotechnical investigations. A standardized letter shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT for review and approval by the COUNTY prior to notifying affected property owners. 35.8 Groundwater Monitoring Monitor groundwater, using piezometers. 35.9 LBR / Resilient Modulus Sampling Collect appropriate samples for Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) testing. Deliver Resilient Modulus samples to a location as directed by the COUNTY. 35.10 Coordination of Field Work Coordinate all field work required to provide geotechnical data for the project. 35.11 Soil and Rock Classification — Roadway Refine soil profiles recorded in the field, based on results of laboratory testing. 35.12 Design LBR Determine design LBR values from the 90% and mean methods when LBR testing is required by the COUNTY. 35.13 Laboratory Data Tabulate laboratory test results for inclusion in the geotechnical report, the report of tests sheet (Roadway Soil Survey Sheet), and for any necessary calculations and analyses. 35.14 Seasonal High -Water Table Review the encountered ground water levels and estimate seasonal high ground water levels. Estimate seasonal low ground water levels, if requested. 35.15 Parameters for Water Retention Areas Calculate parameters for water retention areas, exfiltration trenches, and/or swales. 35.16 Delineate Limits of Unsuitable Material Delineate limits of unsuitable material(s) in both horizontal and vertical directions. Assist the Engineer of Record with detailing these limits on the cross -sections. If requested, prepare a plan view of the limits of unsuitable material. 35.17 Electronic Files for Cross -Sections Create electronic files of boring data for cross -sections. 35.18 Embankment Settlement and Stability Estimate the total magnitude and time rate of embankment settlements. Calculate the factor of safety against slope stability failure. 35.19 Monitor Existing Structures Coordinate with FOR and structural engineer (when applicable) to identify and develop mitigation strategies for sensitive structures and facilities which require special considerations for settlement, vibration and/or groundwater monitoring by the contractor during construction. When there is risk of damage to the structure or facility, provide recommendations in the geotechnical report addressing project specific needs and coordinate those locations with the EOR. See PPM Volume I Chapter 34 and Chapter 9 of the Soils and Foundations Handbook. 35.20 Stormwater Volume Recovery and/or Background Seepage Analysis Perform stormwater volume recovery analysis in consultation with the EOR. 35.21 Geotechnical Recommendations Provide geotechnical recommendations regarding the proposed roadway construction project including the following: description of the site/alignment, design recommendations and discussion of any special considerations (i.e., removal of unsuitable material, consolidation of weak soils, estimated settlement time/amount, groundwater control, high groundwater conditions relative to pavement base, etc.) Evaluate and recommend types of geosynthetics and properties for various applications, as required. 35.22 Pavement Condition Survey and Pavement Evaluation Report If a pavement evaluation is performed, submit the report in accordance with Section 3.2 of the Materials Manual: Flexible Pavement Coring and Evaluation. Enter all core information into the Pavement Coring and Reporting (PCR) system. 35.23 Preliminary Roadway Report If a preliminary roadway investigation is performed, submit a preliminary roadway report before the Phase I plans submittal. The purpose of the preliminary roadway report will be to assist in setting road grades and locating potential problems. Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. A report of tests sheet that summarizes the laboratory test results, the soil stratification (i.e. soils grouped into layers of similar materials) and construction recommendations relative to Standard Plans Indices 120-001 and 120-002. The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis. An appendix that contains stratified soil boring profiles, laboratory test data sheets, sample embankment settlement and stability calculations, design LBR calculation/graphs, and other pertinent calculations. The CONSULTANT will respond in writing to any changes and/or comments from the COUNTY and submit any responses and revised reports. 35.24 Final Report The Final Roadway Report shall include the following: Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. A report of tests sheet that summarizes the laboratory test results, the soil stratification (i.e. soils grouped into layers of similar materials) and construction recommendations relative to Standard Plans Indices 120-001 and 120-002. The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis. An appendix that contains stratified soil boring profiles, laboratory test data sheets, sample embankment settlement and stability calculations, design LBR calculation/graphs, and other pertinent calculations. The CONSULTANT will respond in writing to any changes and/or comments from the COUNTY and submit any responses and revised reports. 35.25 Auger Boring Drafting The auger borings shall be every 100 feet to a depth of 6 feet. 35.26 SPT Boring Drafting Draft SPT borings as directed by the COUNTY. Structures The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordination of all geotechnical related fieldwork activities. The CONSULTANT shall retain all samples until acceptance of 100% plans. Rock cores shall be retained as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing as required by needs of project and as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. All laboratory testing and classification will be performed in accordance with applicable FDOT standards, ASTM Standards or AASHTO Standards, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. The staff hour tasks for high embankment fills and structural foundations for bridges, box culverts, walls, high -mast lighting, overhead signs, mast arm signals, strain poles, buildings, and other structures include the following: 35.27 Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan Develop a detailed boring location plan. Meet with THE COUNTY Project Manager for boring plan approval. If the drilling program expects to encounter artesian conditions, the CONSULTANT shall submit a methodology(s) for plugging the borehole to the COUNTY for approval prior to commencing with the boring program. 35.28 Stake Borings/Utility Clearance Stake borings and obtain utility clearance. 35.29 Coordinate and Develop TTCP for Field Investigation Coordinate and develop TTCP plan. All work zone traffic control will be performed in accordance with the FDOT's Standard Plans Index 102 series. 35.30 Drilling Access Permits Obtain all State, COUNTY, and Water Management District permits for performing geotechnical borings, as needed. 35.31 Property Clearances Notify property tenants in person of drilling and field activities, if applicable. Written notification to property owners/tenants is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. 35.32 Collection of Corrosion Samples Collect corrosion samples for determination of environmental classifications. 35.33 Coordination of Field Work Coordinate all field work required to provide geotechnical data for the project. 35.34 Soil and Rock Classification — Structures Soil profiles recorded in the field should be refined based on the results of laboratory testing. 35.35 Tabulation of Laboratory Data Laboratory test results should be tabulated for inclusion in the geotechnical report and for the necessary calculations and analyses. 35.36 Estimate Design Groundwater Level for Structures Review encountered groundwater levels, estimate seasonal high groundwater levels, and evaluate groundwater levels for structure design. 35.37 Selection of Foundation Alternatives (BDR) Evaluation and selection of foundation alternative, including the following: GRS-IBS Spread footings Prestressed concrete piling - various sizes Steel H- piles Steel pipe piles Drilled shafts Foundation analyses shall be performed using approved FDOT methods. Assist in selection of the most economical, feasible foundation alternative. 35.38 Detailed Analysis of Selected Foundation Alternate(s) — N/A 3 5.3 9 Bridge Construction and Testing Recommendations — N/A 35.40 Lateral Load Analysis (Optional) - N/A 35.41 Walls Provide the design soil profile(s), which include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil engineering properties required by the Engineer of Record for conventional wall analyses and recommendations. Review wall design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. Evaluate the external stability of conventional retaining walls and retained earth wall systems. For retained earth wall systems, calculate and provide minimum soil reinforcement lengths versus wall heights, and soil parameters assumed in analysis. Estimate differential and total (long term and short term) settlements. Provide wall construction recommendations. 35.42 Sheet Pile Wall Analysis (Optional) — N/A 35.43 Design Soil Parameters for Signs, Signals, and Strain Poles and Geotechnical Recommendations Provide the design soil profile(s) that include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil properties required by the Engineer of Record for foundation design. Review design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. 35.44 Box Culvert Analysis — (Bridge Culvert over Cocohatchee Canal, Bridge No. 34056) • Provide the design soil profile(s) that include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil properties required by the Engineer of Record for foundation design. Review design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. • Provide lateral earth pressure coefficients. • Provide preliminary box culvert construction and design recommendations. • Estimate differential and total (long term and short term) settlements. • Evaluate wingwall stability. 35.45 Preliminary Report — BDR The preliminary structures report shall contain the following discussions as appropriate for the assigned project: Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. Summary of structure background data, S.C.S., U.S.G.S., geologic and potentiometric data. The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis). Recommendations for foundation installation, or other site preparation soils -related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary. Any special provisions required for construction that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard specification. An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, engineering analysis, notes/sample calculations, sheets showing ultimate bearing capacity curves versus elevation for piles and drilled shafts, a complete FHWA check list, pile driving records (if available), and any other pertinent information. 35.46 Final Report - Bridge and Associated Walls — N/A 35.47 Final Reports - Signs, Signals The final reports shall include the following: Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. Summary of structure background data, S.C.S., U.S.G.S., geologic and potentiometric data. The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis). Recommendations for foundation installation, or other site preparation soils -related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary. Any special provisions required for construction that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard specification. An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, engineering analysis, notes/sample calculations, sheets showing ultimate bearing capacity curves versus elevation for piles and drilled shafts, a complete FHWA check list, pile driving records (if available), and any other pertinent information. Final reports will incorporate comments from the COUNTY and contain any additional field or laboratory test results, recommended foundation alternatives along with design parameters and special provisions for the contract plans. These reports will be submitted to the COUNTY Project Manager for review prior to project completion. After review by the COUNTY, the reports will be submitted to the COUNTY Project Manager in final form and will include the following: All original plan sheets (11" x 17") One set of all plan and specification documents, in electronic format, according to COUNTY requirements All reference and support documentation used in preparation of contract plans package The final reports, special provisions, as well as record prints, will be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Florida. Draft the detailed boring/sounding standard sheet, including environmental classification, results of laboratory testing, and specialized construction requirements, for inclusion in final plans. 35.48 SPT Boring Drafting Prepare a complete set of drawings to include all SPT borings, auger borings and other pertinent soils information in the plans. Include these drawings in the Final Geotechnical Report. Draft borings, location map, S.C.S. map and U.S.D.A. map as directed by the COUNTY. Soil symbols must be consistent with those presented in the latest Florida Department of Transportation Soils and Foundations Handbook. 35.49 Other Geotechnical Other geotechnical effort specifically required for the project as determined by the COUNTY and will be considered Optional Services,if requested by the COUNTY. 35.50 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 35.51 Field Reviews Identify and note surface soil and rock conditions, surface water conditions and locations, and preliminary utility conflicts. Observe and note nearby structures and foundation types. 35.52 Technical Meetings 35.53 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 35.54 Supervision 35.55 Coordination 36 3D MODELING — N/A 37 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 37.1 Liaison Office The COUNTY and the CONSULTANT will designate a Liaison Office and a Project Manager who shall be the representative of their respective organizations for the Project. While it is expected the CONSULTANT shall seek and receive advice from various state, regional, and local agencies, the final direction on all matters of this project remain with the COUNTY Project Manager. 37.2 Key Personnel The CONSULTANT's work shall be performed and directed by the key personnel identified in the proposal presentations by the CONSULTANT. Any changes in the indicated personnel shall be subject to review and approval by COUNTY. 37.3 Progress Reporting The CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY as required and shall provide a written monthly progress report that describes the work performed on each task along with approved schedule and schedule status. The Project Manager will make judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has been accomplished by comparing the reported percent complete against actual work accomplished. 37.4 Correspondence Copies of all written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically to this contract shall be provided to the COUNTY for their records within one (1) week of the receipt or mailing of said correspondence. 37.5 Professional Endorsement The CONSULTANT shall have a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Florida sign and seal all reports, documents, Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions, and plans as required by FDOT and COUNTY standards. 37.6 Computer Automation The project will be developed utilizing Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) systems. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to meet the requirements in the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT shall submit final documents and files as described therein or as amended by this Scope of Services 37.7 Coordination with Other CONSULTANTs The CONSULTANT is to coordinate his work with any and all adjacent and integral consultants so as to effect complete and homogenous plans and specifications for the project(s) described herein. 37.8 Optional Services At the COUNTY's option, the CONSULTANT may be requested to provide optional services. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, scope and fee will be negotiated at that time and will be implemented via Change Order. When applicable, the staff hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination Additional services may be authorized by Change Order or supplemental amendment in accordance with the County's Procurement Policy. The additional services may include other Services as required. 38 INVOICING LIMITS Payment for the work accomplished shall be in accordance with Method of Compensation of this contract. Invoices shall be submitted to the COUNTY, in a format prescribed by the COUNTY. The COUNTY Project Manager and the CONSULTANT shall monitor the cumulative invoiced billings to ensure the reasonableness of the billings compared to the project schedule and the work accomplished and accepted by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall provide a list of key events and the associated total percentage of work considered to be complete at each event. This list shall be used to control invoicing. Payments will not be made that exceed the percentage of work for any event until those events have occurred and the results are acceptable to the COUNTY RESPONSE FORMAT AND SCORING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTLIST: Proposals must be assembled, at minimum, in the order of the Evaluation Criteria listed or your proposal may be deemed non -responsive Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points 1. Ability of Professional Personnel 20 Points 2. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 5 Points 3. Past Performance 25 Points 4. Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 20 Points 5. Location 10 Points 6. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 20 Points TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points For complete explanation of each evaluation criteria, please see the file titled "RPS Instructions" included with this advertisement. VENDOR CHECKLIST ***Vendor should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed (please see, Vendor Check List)**** 7 UTILITIES A- 109 - DESIGN SERVICES FOR WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING - RPS NO.. 22-8006 ww n. r i 1 F� icy '3a � ,-� �y � ■, M aa: - �' . stele • • • • • i July 28, 2022 Leeann Charles, Procurement Strategist Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2 Naples, FL 34112 Subject: Request for Professional Services - Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening - RPS No. 22-8006 Our team members have already evaluated the project and identified recommended improvements to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. These recommendations will maximize operational efficiency, improve constructability, minimize impacts, reduce costs, and expedite permitting! Dear Selection Committee Members: To successfully complete the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design, the Collier County Transportation Engineering Division (County) needs to partner with a proven, local team of consultants with a comprehensive understanding of required roadway design elements, bicycle and pedestrian needs, CAT infrastructure, existing and proposed site conditions, proposed development, access management, constructability issues, needed utility relocations, drainage requirements, and "Critical Path" schedule items such as Permitting and ROW acquisition. Jacobs is that team! As documented in the Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, the widening of Wilson Boulevard is a key component of the County's future plans to improve the overall traffic network and system connectivity in Golden Gate Estates and the eastern Collier County area. Wilson Boulevard will be the first four -lane north -south roadway east of Collier Boulevard and will improve mobility and connectivity along the corridor and within the area. The future Wilson Boulevard will need to accommodate more than 18,000 (AADT) vehicles once the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBRX) is constructed (per latest Florida Department of Transportation [FDOT] District 1 Traffic Model). This design project should not only consider the soon to be constructed intersection of VBRX along its corridor, but also the future Randall Boulevard Phase II (Fly -Over) intersection project and Wilson Boulevard Extension Corridor Project. For example, because of the future Fly- Over's impacts to the Wilson Boulevard and Immokalee Road intersection, there are potential opportunities and constraints that need to be evaluated to improve traffic operations and safety, maintain access and minimize costs. It's crucial that the County's consultant team understands the complexities associated with these intertwining projects, as well as the many associated design, permitting, and construction challenges. Because of our direct project experience with not only the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Blvd Widening Impact Study, but also the Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study and the VBRX study and design, Jacobs has an exceptional understanding of this project's unique needs and is ready to help the County deliver this project efficiently and effectively. Our team, led by Project Manager (PM) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, has full access to all the staff resources required to deliver the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design. Bill has 34 years of transportation planning, design, and construction experience and has managed or coordinated 13 of our firm's major Collier County roadway projects and 15 general service Contracts. Bill will be your primary point of contact, and he'll leverage his experience delivering County projects with aggressive schedules and stakeholder coordination challenges to lead our talented, multi -firm team in advancing the design to construction while minimizing County effort. Your staff knows Bill as a proactive client service manager who has been 100% dedicated to Collier County for the last 24 years. Bill combines the best of planning, design, and construction —a combination that is hard to match. He meets all the stated requirements in your Request for Professional Services (RPS), including knowledge and experience with current construction and regulatory conditions, good communication skills with a strong commitment to team collaboration, and successful delivery of contract documents in accordance with FDOT and County policies, procedures, and requirements. Colleen Ross, PE, will be Bill's Deputy PM and lead the project's community outreach. Colleen was the Deputy PM and Environmental lead for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and has comprehensive experience coordinating similar projects. The Jacobs team is certified with FDOT in all required Service Categories and pre -qualified with FDOT in the required work groups for this project. Supporting Jacobs on this project are five subconsultants that bring specialized expertise and recent, relevant experience working with both Jacobs and the County: Johnson Engineering, Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS), Environmental Science Associates (ESA), Archaeological & Historical Conservancy (AHC), and Ardaman & Associates. Jacobs has previously worked with each of these firms, and they are a perfect complement to our team from both a professional and personal perspective. These firms bring specialized skills and relevant knowledge of both the County and the project area. • `�j r ESA ENGINEERING CAPITAL Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants Our team's understanding of the history behind this project and the planned development within the area means no time or money is wasted re-evaluating or pursing alternatives that have already been deemed non -feasible or that don't conform to the needs and desires of the County and many project stakeholders. 0063t000002EkAyAAh Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page i Our team's previous and current experience within the project area is extensive (See Project Exhibit 3-2 in Section 3): ■ Jacobs (PM Bill Gramer) completed the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study with survey support from Johnson Engineering, geotechnical support from Ardaman. (Reference Score: 100) ■ Jacobs (PM Diana Francois) completed the Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Blvd Widening Impact Study (Reference Score: 100) ■ Jacobs (PM Bill Gramer) completed the VBRX Design with geotechnical support from Ardaman & Associates, cultural resources support from Archaeological & Historical Conservancy, noise support from ESA, design support from Capital and Environmental Support from Johnson) (Reference Score: 100) ■ Jacobs (PM Bill Gramer) completed the Randall Boulevard Corridor Study with noise support from ESA, cultural resources support from Archaeological & Historical Conservancy, and Environmental Support from Johnson. (Reference Score 98) ■ Jacobs (PM Tara Jones) completed the Randall Boulevard at Immokalee Road PD&E Study - FDOT District 1 (with natural resources support from ESA, cultural resources support from Archaeological & Historical Conservancy) Our team has also conducted comprehensive field work and data collection (i.e., GIS survey, utility information, field photos, and aerial photos) to prepare for this proposal. We've reviewed all relevant project documentation and researched project issues, including access management, drainage, right-of-way and easements, developer agreements, and required permits. Our team's two decades of previous work within the Wilson Boulevard Widening project area and our extensive preparation for this proposal provides us with unique knowledge of the project area, allowing us to proactively address all critical path elements of this project. During the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Jacobs refined the design concepts numerous times to incorporate input from the County's traffic, planning, design and construction departments, as well as input from Collier Area Transit (CAT). Our previous project experience will save you both time and money, and our history with Golden Gate Estates residents and businesses will result in a more successful public outreach and project approval. Our team will ensure this project is designed properly, so that it is constructible, and functions safely and efficiently. Our Public Involvement Plan will pick up where it left off at the corridor study and continue to build consensus from the local residential community and other stakeholders. Our team offers world-renowned planning, engineering, and construction expertise, a strong local presence, a multi -disciplinary in-house team, and directly applicable local experience. Unique features that set Jacobs apart Jacobs is uniquely positioned to deliver this project on time and within budget, with your goals in mind. ,;acobs Our team members are committed to serving you on the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design project throughout the duration of this contract. We look forward to continuing to partner with the County and help you achieve your goals and visions for our community. If you have any questions or require additional information, contact me at 239.860.4922 or Bill.Gramera jacobs.com. Our team stands ready to begin work immediately! Sincerely, JACOBS Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Project Manager Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page ii Table of Contents 1-1 Evaluation Criteria No.1 Ability of Professional Personnel 2-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 2 Certified Minority Business Enterprise 3-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 3 Past Performance 4-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 4 Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 5-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 5 Location 6-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 6 Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm A-1 Appendix A Required Forms B-1 Appendix B Addenda C-1 Appendix C Licenses D-1 Appendix D Resumes Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page iii y a , « y\ & >: :N��: -: tngtoday. �acobsReinvenbg tomorrow. Since 1977, Collier County (County) has consistently relied upon our team to provide planning, design, permitting, and construction management services on a multitude of roadway, utility, site -civil and permitting projects. Our long-term partnership has helped our Naples -based staff develop a thorough understanding of local conditions, existing infrastructure, County requirements, Agency criteria, and stakeholder concerns. We have more than 30 years of experience delivering projects in the County, and we are familiar with your organization and preferred project delivery process. Our Naples team understands the critical elements necessary to successfully deliver the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design project and ensure that it complies with all applicable design standards. We are certified with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in all required service categories and pre -qualified in the required work groups for this project. Our current workload is such that this project aligns perfectly with our team's availability. The core team from our Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Project, which finished design in March 2022, is ready to transition to this project. In addition, several of our major projects currently under design will be reaching their final plan delivery milestones during Q1 of 2023—right when the Wilson Boulevard project will begin design. Our Subconsultant Partners We have assembled a team of trusted subconsultant partners to deliver this project. Leveraging our proven track record of collaborating to deliver County projects and drawing on each firm's unique strengths, we will identify cost -feasible and technically sound solutions for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design with a focus on solutions that will gain agency and public consensus quickly. Jacobs has worked with each of these firms on numerous Collier County Transportation projects. Johnson Engineering, Inc. will provide all required survey/SUE/right- of-way (ROW) services and assist with utility and environmental tasks. ENGINEERING Johnson Engineering provides a wide variety of engineering services for transportation design, utility improvements, environmental permitting, land development, land planning, landscape architecture, and construction observation and inspection. Their surveying and mapping group specializes in subsurface utility location and mapping or subsurface utility exploration (SUE), transportation surveying, hydrographic surveying, and geographic information systems (GIS). Johnson Engineering has provided services on many projects in the County, including work on Livingston Road. Jacobs and Johnson Engineering have worked together on many varied projects throughout Florida, including County projects. We recently worked together on the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study, Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening, and Collier 111 Projects. Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS) will provide support for data collection, maintenance of traffic (MOT), and public outreach. CCS brings local knowledge CAPITAL and relationships with a variety of Southwest Florida stakeholders, including Collier County, Collier MPO, Lee County, Lee County MPO, FDOT District One, and the City of Bonita Springs. CCS has worked side -by -side with our Naples -based staff on multiple projects, including many County General Services Contracts, FDOT LAP projects, and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening. CCS is a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) firm based in Collier County, and its founderAdam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC, has direct experience on County roadways, including Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier Boulevard, Immokalee Road, Oil Well Road, and Tree Farm Road. SA Environmental Science Associates (ESA) will conduct noise studies Efor this proiect. An environmental consulting and planning firm J committed to sustainability principles, ESA brings more than 50 years of experience in all aspects of project planning, environmental assessment, natural resource management, and regulatory compliance. ESA has 30 years of experience in the Florida transportation industry, including conducting noise studies for surface transportation projects. ESA staff have helped clients with traffic noise -related policy and guidance document development, peer reviews, and development and instruction of traffic noise training courses. ESA staff have received formal training in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA's) Traffic Noise Model (TNM) and Highway Traffic Noise Analysis from the National Highway Institute and are FDOT-certified to perform traffic noise studies. ESA has provided Noise Studies for numerous Jacobs Collier County projects including Collier Blvd 1, Collier Blvd 11, Collier Blvd 111, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. ESA team members conducting noise studies Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-1 Archaeological and Historical Conservancy (AHC) will provide archaeological ` and historical services. AHC is a Florida not -for -profit corporation that has been active since 1985. They have provided pivotal leadership documenting and assessing historical, archaeological, and architectural sites throughout Southwest Florida. AHC has helped developers and property owners meet local and state historic preservation requirements and worked with the local government to develop historic preservation ordinances and County- and city-wide surveys. They have conducted surveys in Collier, Broward, Martin, Monroe, and Palm Beach counties, including over 500 assessments 1985. Specifically, AHC has conducted archaeological assessments in Collier County since 1988. These have included private parcels, national parks, preserves, and road ROW projects, including the CR846 (Immokolee) Road Widening, Livingston Road Expansion, Collier Boulevard Widening and Vanderbilt Road Extension. �'U Ardaman &Associates, Inc. Ardaman & Associates, Inc. (Ardaman) will provide geotechnical M me o o d services. They prepared the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report for the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Widening Study and have direct knowledge of the project area. They bring extensive experience in Florida's transportation infrastructure, including geotechnical engineering on hundreds of transportation projects ranging from full design of complex interchanges and high-level marine bridge structures to small County roadway widening projects and Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies. Ardaman has continually provided geotechnical services in Southwest Florida since 1974. Their staff understand and are experienced implementing current FDOT and local County design standards and methodologies. Ardaman has provided geotechnical services for numerous Jacobs, Collier County, and FDOT projects —many managed by our team members —including the Collier Boulevard (CR 951), Gotor Canal Bridge, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Alligator Alley Collier County Toll Plaza, and North Collier Boulevard from Jolley Bridge to San Marco Road Phase 11 projects. A truly integrated team of professionals brings broad -based skills and experience to meet all project requirements The key personnel that have committed to working on this project bring a broad base of technical expertise and familiarity with the County and FDOT standards. Our entire survey, geotechnical, design, permitting, and production team is local, accessible, and available to meet with County staff as needed. Our team organization structure is presented in Exhibit 1-1 on the following page. As shown in our organization chart, many of the members of our proposed team were directly involved in either the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study and/or Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study. This experience will allow our team to streamline the delivery of the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project. Our team understands the critical path of this project and will focus efforts and decision making on keeping the associated tasks on schedule. Our Dedicated Team of Experts EXHIBIT 1-1 Team Organizational Chart e KEY QA/QC - ROADWAY ,i�r Ken Wooten, PI PROJECT MANAGER DEPUTY PM * Bill Gramer, PE, AICP* * Colleen Ross, PE PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE Bill Beddow, PE * Worked on the Wilson Blvd Corridor Study QA/QC - STRUCTUF Velvet Bridges, MSCE QA/QC - DRAINAGE/ PERMITTING Danh Lee, PE Technical Leads GEOTECHNICAL & LABORATORY TESTING 'i2r Curt Basnett, PE '�r Ivan Sokolic, PE '�r Cory Schulte, El ROADWAY DESIGN Eric Bridges, PE STRUCTURAL DESIGN i�7 Randy Mock, PE DRAINAGE * Angela Shepard, PE PERMITTING/ENVIRONMENTAL * Rick Gorsira UTILITIES * Mike Dickey, PE ■ HIGHWAY & ROADWAY * Bill Gramer, PE, AICP* i7 Kevin Heldorfer ti7 Nick De Ciccio, PE STRUCTURES & BRIDGES * Lev Zilberman, PE Chris Braden, PE DRAINAGE/PERMITTING * Darren Dyer, PE Tatiana Alvarez, PE 'i�7 Felicia Kirby, El 'i�7 Kristen Bridges Kim Arnold, PG ■ ENVIRONMENTAL * Felicia Kirby, El Jennifer Korn, PhD, CWB ■ Laura Herrero, CSE ■ Greg Thomas, AE ■ UTILITY DESIGN/ CONSTRUCTION * Kevin Heldorfer Jared Brown, PE ■ * Billy Saum, PE ■ SUE Mark Texter, PSM* ■ MOT WELL HOUSE VAULT * Bill Gramer, PE, AICP* DESIGN MODIFICATION Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC* ♦ COORDINATION * Kevin Heldorfer * Diana Francois, PE * Tao Fu, PE SIGNING, MARKING & LIGHTING & CHANNELIZATION SIGNALIZAT10N Milagros Cepeda DeeAngela Tjikueni, PE Milagros Cepeda ITS * Tom Ross, PE NOISE STUDY I Ernest Sackey, PE, CVP Mike Mulbarger E3 Ryan Horstman E3 ROW MAPPING %7 Guy Adams, PSM ■ CONTROL SURVEYING '� Ray Dechert ■ *Guy Adams, PSM ■ '�r Kevin Heldorfer * Ray Dechert ■ FOUNDATION STUDIES TRAFFIC DATA & MODELING * Curt Basnett, PE Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC* * Ivan Sokolic, PE ♦ Fritznel Saint Louis * Robert Grubel DEVELOPER/ ADJACENT PROJECT COMMUNITY OUTREACH COORDINATION * Colleen Ross, PE * Bill Gramer, PE, AICP* * Tara Jones, PE * Tom Ross, PE * Vanessa Davis GRAPHICS Steve Godin ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL David Dishman Robert Carr • * Nathan Lunsford, El Ryan Franklin, PhD 0 Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC* ♦ John Beriault • ■ Johnson Engineering Capital Consulting Solutions ❑ Environmental Science Associates (ESA) • Archaeological and Historical Conservancy (AHC) Ardaman & Associates *Advanced MOT -certified Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening i RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-3 MEET YOUR KEY STAFF Brief overviews of select team members and their unique qualifications to serve you are provided below. Full resumes for key staff are included in Appendix D. BILL Gramer, PE, AICP Jacobs Project Manager/Highway and Roadway/MOT Bill has more than 34 years of experience managing and coordinating a wide range of planning and engineering assignments. He routinely manages and coordinates multi -firm team efforts and provides insight into local conditions, clients, and agencies. Bill is well known to the County as a proactive manager who has been 100 percent dedicated to Collier County for more than 24 years, including serving as project manager and roadway task lead for all of our teams' major Collier County roadway projects and 15 General Services Contracts. Bill successfully led the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, giving him unmatched insight into this project. COLLEEN Ross, PE Jacobs Deputy PM/Community Outreach Colleen brings 9 years of experience delivering various major transportation projects and over 14 years of engineering experience. She specializes in project coordination, NEPA and PD&E study and compliance, corridor planning, and planning and design public outreach. Colleen was Deputy Project Manager and Environmental Lead on the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, giving her in-depth knowledge of the project and its surroundings. KEN Wooten, PE Is QA/QC — Roadway Ken has more than 20 years of experience designing roadways, managing multidisciplinary design projects, and conducting PD&E studies. He specializes in roadway design and planning for highway facilities, including interstate highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and urban and rural arterial roads. He has managed multiple roadway and intersection design projects throughout Florida, including milling and resurfacing. Ken has experience performing quality control reviews of design and concept plans and has served as a quality manager responsible for project's overall quality control on multiple projects. Ken brings extensive design experience, served as 0A/0CManager on numerous Collier County Roadway projects and was a key team member on the County's Oil Well Road project. VELVET Bridges, PE, MSCE Jacobs QA/QC — Structures Velvet has 33 years of experience in the design of concrete bridges, ship impact, structural modeling, and quality control. Her experience also includes preliminary and final design of major bridge structures in concrete, including grade separations and water crossing, post -tensioned segmental concrete and long -span cable -stayed types. Velvet has substantial experience in the construction phase of many projects, inspection, load rating, and rehabilitation of new and existing bridges. DANH Lee, PE Jacobs QA/QC — Drainage/Permitting Danh has over 20 years of experience preparing transportation and drainage design and developing plans for major and minor roadways, expressways, and interstate highways, including major multi -level interchanges. He has successfully procured numerous surface water and environmental permits for clients across Florida, including permits from St. Johns River Water Management District, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Danh brings in-depth knowledge of drainage needs and considerations along the project corridor, having served as Drainage OC Lead for the Pond Siting Report as part of the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study. ERIC Bridges, PE Jacobs 4 Roadway Design Task Lead Eric brings over 9 years of roadway and highway geometric design experience, 1 including plans production, quantity estimates, analyzing design criteria, and GIS mapping related to Crash Analysis Reporting Systems (CARS). Eric is proficient in AutoCAD, Microstation, FDOT SS10, FDOT ORD, Corridor and 3-D Modeling, drainage software ASAD, and AGi32, a simulation tool for designing lighting projects. Eric is skilled in verifying compliance with FDOT standards and AASHTO standards and specifications. Eric assisted with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening projects. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-4 KEY STAFF, CONT. RANDY Mock, PE Jacobs Structural Design Task Lead Randy brings over 40 years of civil and structural engineering experience on transportation projects throughout Florida. His background includes bridge, interchange, highway, and marine structure design, and he brings best practices and lessons learned from numerous highway and interchange projects throughout Florida. Randy will leverage this extensive engineering experience to deliver high quality structural design solutions, tailored to meet your objectives. Randy provided QA/QC and/or design services on every bridge and structural assignment our firm has done for Collier County. ANGELA Shepard, PE 11 Jacobs Drainage Task Lead Angela has over 13 years of experience in roadway and drainage, including stormwater management facilities, culvert, ditch, and storm drainage design. Her experience spans multiple water management districts. In coordination with the FDOT Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) Office and FDOT Drainage Technical Advisory Committee, Angela developed custom application resources for FDOT Connect Drainage in OpenRoads Designer on the Bentley MicroStation CADD platform, training materials, and course curriculum. She has organized and taught several training sessions on new drainage workflows throughout Florida. Angela served as Drainage Lead on the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and assisted with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. RICK Gorsira Jacobs Permitting/Environmental Rick has over 40 years of experience in ecological assessments, stormwater, surface water, groundwater, wetland delineation, sediment sampling design, and wildlife assessments. He has expertise monitoring wellfield withdrawal impacts on wetland hydrology and other water supply projects. Rick has managed numerous projects involving National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting and environmental compliance, and he brings extensive experience in aerial photo interpretation, hydroperiod assessments, water supply and reuse water recharge applications, and Environmental Resource Program permitting for water supply projects throughout Florida. Rick assisted with the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project and Collier Boulevard Widening project(s). MIKE Dickey, PE Utilities Task Lead E N G I N E E R I N G Mike has 25 years of experience on utility projects, including planning and distribution and collection systems. Mike's experience includes working for a local utility contractor, giving him an in-depth understanding of how engineering designs are translated from paper to pipes in the ground. This experience has also honed Mike's ability to develop designs that emphasize constructibility. Mike has been the project manager and engineer of record for many water and wastewater utility projects in Southwest Florida. TOM Ross, PE Jacobs Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Analysis and Design Lead Tom has more than 32 years of experience in transportation planning, traffic operations, and design. He specializes in travel demand forecasting, project traffic reports, interchange justification or modification reports, preliminary engineering, PD&E studies, traffic operations analysis, master planning, access management, traffic signal design, signal timing, adaptive traffic signal systems, signing and pavement marking plans, and intelligent transportation systems throughout Florida. Tom managed two cycles of the FDOT District 1 General Transportation Planning Consultant contract and three cycles of their District - Wide Systems Contract and brings deep familiarity with FDOT standards. Tom was the lead traffic engineer and assisted with the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier Boulevard Widening projects) and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening project and serves Collier County as needed to perform reviews of traffic impact reports (100+ to date) and DRIs and develop guidelines for traffic impact studies. ERNEST Sackey, PE 11 Jacobs ITS Analysis and Design Ernest is an experienced ITS and traffic engineer with specialized expertise Ain the design, maintenance, and operations of ITS and tolling systems, traffic operations centers, traffic signal systems, connected and autonomous vehicle systems, and smart systems. Ernest specializes in ITS device specification and placement, field deployment of ITS, electrical and telecommunications design, and highway design. Ernest was the Senior ITS Engineer for the development of Florida's Turnpike Enterprise SunTrax Test Facility in Polk County. He is a certified Connected Vehicle Professional with 18 years of experience on projects in Florida, Virginia, Georgia, and Maryland. Ernest has more than 14 years of experience related to planning and design for a wide range of transportation improvement projects throughout Florida and has assisted our team on many Collier county projects. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-5 KEY STAFF, CONT. iLMARK Texter, PSM SUE Lead ENGENGI® Mark brings 36 years of land surveying experience ranging from a rodman on a survey crew to the owner of a land surveying business, with an emphasis on construction surveying. Mark has worked extensively on roadways, construction sites, and numerous boundary surveys ranging from one -quarter acre lots to 10,000-acre tracts as well as our subsurface utility exploration (SUE) projects. Having provided SUE services for more than 20 years, our firm recently acquired the newest line of Vermeer's high -capacity, 4-wheel drive, diesel truck -mounted vacuum excavation to perform SUE services. Mark has performed SUEservices on many projects, including Vanderbilt Drive in Collier County. JENNIFER Korn, PhD, CWB Environmental ENGINEERING Jennifer is a wildlife biologist with 19 years of experience working with protected species, including the federally endangered Florida panther, and coordinating with federal and state agencies, non -governmental organizations, and private landowners. She has given close to 100 outreach presentations to both professional organizations and the public on land management and living with panthers. Jennifer provides wildlife surveys, GIS analyses, habitat management plans, vegetation mapping, and wetland jurisdictional determinations for her clients. LAURA Herrero, CSE Environmental E N G I N E E R I N G Laura has 28 years of experience and is the director of Johnson Engineering's environmental consulting team. As a Certified Senior Ecologist, Laura has led environmental and permitting efforts on many private and public sector projects. She has also provided expert witness testimony on ecological issues related to Collier and Lee County zoning cases. Laura has worked on several County projects near Wilson Boulevard, including the Randall Boulevard Corridor Study, and is currently assisting the Jacobs team with two Collier County roadway projects: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and Collier Boulevard 11L GUY Adams, PSM �' ROW Mapping ENGINEERING Guy's professional experience spans more than four decades. He draws on his vast field experience to lead projects, including boundary and topographic surveys, platting, hydrographic surveys, sketch, and legal descriptions. Guy performed ROW mapping on the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study, giving him in-depth knowledge of the project corridor and Golden Gate Estates area. ADAM Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC MOT/Traffic Data Collection/Graphics CAPITAL Adam is the managing member of CCS, a Naples -based MBE, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) firm. Prior to founding CCS in 2017, Adam worked for Jacobs in their Naples office. This established professional and personal relationship results in seamless integration of CCS and Jacobs resources. Adam has worked side -by -side with Bill Gramer and the entire Naples -based Jacobs team on many projects in Collier County, such as the County's General Services Contracts, Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier Boulevard, Immokolee Road, Oil Well Road, and Tree Farm Road. DARREN Dyer, PE Jacobs Drainage/Permitting Darren's experience includes drainage design, environmental permitting, and plans production for infrastructure projects in South Florida. He is experienced preparing preliminary design, final design, and post -design and brings design - build experience as owner's representative. His Florida -specific drainage and permitting experience will add tremendous value to this project. Darren assisted the Jacobs team on recent Collier County roadway projects including the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier Boulevard Widening and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening project. MIKE Mulbarger r PSA Noise Study Mike has over 20 years of experience providing technical analysis, project management, and field support on environmental assessments for clients across Florida with a focus in noise studies. He is formally trained in the FHWA Traffic Noise Model and Highway Traffic Noise Analysis from the National Highway Institute. Mike is FDOT-certified to perform traffic noise analysis and is a past appointed member of the ADC40 Committee on Transportation -Related Noise and Vibration of the Transportation Research Board and FDOT Noise Task Team. Mike is deeply familiar with traffic noise studies in Collier County, having conducted numerous design -phase traffic noise studies for County roadway improvement projects, including Collier Boulevard from US-41 to Davis Boulevard, Collier Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Green, Vanderbilt Beach Road from Airport -Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard, and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension from Collier Boulevard to Desoto Boulevard.. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-6 Redundant technical resources to support our task leads keep your project on schedule and within budget Collier Wilson Blvd Team Member Role do Experience Study Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Project Manager J ✓ Colleen Ross, PE Deputy Project Manager ✓ ✓ Ken Wooten, PE QA/QC —Roadway ✓ ✓ Velvet Bridges, PE MSCE QA/OC —Structures Danh Lee, PE QA/QC—Drainage/Permitting J ✓ Eric Bridges, PE Roadway Design Lead ✓ Randy Mock, PE Structural Design Lead ✓ ✓ Angela Shepard, PE Drainage Lead J ✓ Rick Gorsira Permitting/Environmental ✓ ✓ Lead Geotechnical & Curt Basnett, PE Laboratory Testing; ✓ ✓ Foundation Studies Highway & Roadway; Utility Kevin Heldorfer Design/Construction; MOT, ✓ ✓ c ROW Mapping cio, PE Highway & Roadway ✓ ✓ an PE Structures &Bridges ✓ ✓ n, PE kDarren Structures &Bridges J r, PE Drainage/Permittingarez, PE Drainage/Permitting ✓ Felicia Kirby, El Drainage/Permitting; ✓ ✓ Environmental Kristen Bridges Drainage/Permitting J ✓ Signing, Marking & Milagros Cepeda Channelization; Lighting & ✓ Signalization Tom Ross, PE ITS; Developer/Adjacent ✓ ✓ Project Coordination Ernest Sackey, PE, CVP ITS ✓ Aaron Johnson, PE ITS ✓ Steve Godin Graphics J Collier Wilson Blvd Team Member Role do Experience Study David Dishman Graphics J Nathan Lunsford, El Graphics ✓ ✓ Diana Francois, PE Well House Vault Design ✓ ✓ Modification Coordination Ln c Tao Fu PE Well House Vault Design ✓ ✓ a Modification Coordination DeeAngela Tjikueni, PE Lighting & Signalization J obert Grubel Traffic Data &Modeling ✓ ✓ f araJones, PE Community Outreachanessa Davis Community Outreachike Dickey PE Utilities Lead J ✓ Kim Arnold, PG Drainage/Permitting ✓ (Dewatering Permits) z Jennifer Korn, PhD, CWB Environmental ✓ W Laura Herrero, CSE Environmental ✓ z a Greg Thomas, AE Environmental J W Jared Brown, PE Utility Design/Construction ✓ o Billy Saum, PE Utility Design/Construction ✓ ✓ c Mark Texter, PSM SUE ✓ Guy Adams, PSM ROW Mapping; Control ✓ ✓ Surveying Ray Dechert ROW Mapping; Control Surveying J ✓ Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP MOT, Graphics ✓ Fritznel Saint Louis Traffic Data & Modeling ✓ a Mike Mulbarger Noise Study ✓ Ryan Horstman Noise Study Robert Carr Archaeological/Historical J aRyan Franklin, PhD Archaeological/Historical John Beriault Archaeological/Historical za Ivan Sokolic, PE Geotechnical & Lab Testing; ✓ ✓ c Foundation Studies a Cory Schulte, El Geotechnical & Lab Testing ✓ ✓ Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-7 Our team members know Collier County and understand every aspect of the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design project Your Wilson Boulevard Widening Design team must effectively engage the right technical expertise and relevant experience to seamlessly advance the design to construction. This requires a team with knowledge of the project's technical complexities, including associated well infrastructure, and institutional knowledge of the various project components, including existing and future traffic, urban roadway typical section, bicycle and pedestrian needs, CAT infrastructure, existing and future development, access management, environmental impacts, bridge requirements, utility relocations, and project stakeholders. As the team who delivered the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study, we are confident that we have the technical expertise, local, relevant experience, and established relationships to deliver this project in a streamlined, timely, and cost-effective manner. We will capitalize on our previous design project experience to provide implementable, cost-effective solutions that protect environmentally sensitive resources and build consensus by re-engaging the multiple stakeholders we collaborated with during the study. The refinements made to the proposed project during the corridor study will allow our team to immediately move into design without unnecessary re -work. Team will Focus on Critical Project Elements Our experience conducting the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Widening Study allows us to hit the ground running on this project. We already have a deep understanding of the project's challenges, particularly with utilities, well infrastructure, and drainage, giving us a head start on refining the conceptual design and expediting permitting to get this project into construction on time and with potential cost savings for the County. Our task leads will focus on the following "CRITICAL PATH" project components: 1. ROW needs for the widening and associated stormwater treatment facilities as well as relocated 24 Inch RWM —Allow 12 Month Schedule for ROW acquisition (From Sketch and Description) 2. SFWMD ERP, FDEP Permit, SFWMD Dewatering Permit, SFWMD ROW Permit(s) —Allow 9-12 Month Schedule for Permit(s) These two Critical Path Items will require early resolution of the following design components: • Roadway Typical Section — Final Refinement to Typical Section, Turn lane requirements, access management Bicycle and Pedestrian Access • Drainage Basin and Pond Location Refinement — Proximity to well sites (> 100 Ft per SFWMD Criteria), conveyance and discharge locations • Environmental Surveys (including Wetland, T&E Species, etc.) —Surveys, Coordination and Field Reviews with Agencies • Wilson Bridge replacement over the Cypress Canal and Wilson culvert replacement for CocohatcheeCanal—Required Typical Section, Clearances, Phasing • Access management for existing and planned developments at the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard intersection — Estates Shopping Center (ORD 21-40) • Utility easements required for the raw water main relocation and well site improvements — Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Well House and Infrastructure Improvements • Constructability, construction phasing, and MOT —Traffic requirements, adjacent residential requirements (access, safety, etc.) Roadway Design Our team members have already performed preliminary engineering analyses for the corridor and associated intersection improvements. There are a number of constraints along the project corridor, including the residential properties and driveways, non-residential properties, and County water supply production wells and associated infrastructure. To minimize impacts as much as possible, during the study we evaluated multiple typical section options at 5-foot incremental shifts to find the optimal typical section and roadway alignment. Our team already understands the complexities and needs of the project, and we're ready to serve you again. Our team has worked on nearly every major roadway in the County over the past two decades, including numerous projects within the area and will use the knowledge gained by that history to successfully deliver this project. Drainage Drainage is a major issue for this project, as flooding occurs along the roadway and adjacent properties during heavy rain events. The County water wells constrain the location of stormwater pond sites (> 100 foot clearance), making drainage solutions more complicated. In addition, the major flooding on the corridor's side streets that occurs during normal rain events will need to be addressed. We understand the existing drainage conditions along the corridor and already developed solutions. We are experienced in all aspects of drainage design required for Wilson Boulevard. We have planned and designed closed and open drainage systems on more than 100 miles of roadways for Collier County, including over 30 pond systems. ROW Acquisition Our preliminary analyses included an evaluation of ROW requirements. For Wilson Boulevard a minimum of 202 parcels will be impacted, not including the tapers to north/south, pond sites or potential side street impacts. In addition, Temporary Construction Easements will also be required for the majority of these parcels with residential or commercial access for driveway connections. We understand the ROW acquisition needs and additional easements required for the roadway expansion, well house infrastructure, and stormwater pond sites. Our experience assisting the County through the ROW acquisition and the settlement process is unmatched. Our recent project experience with Vanderbilt Beach Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-8 Road Extension project included ROW acquisition, full property takes, and easement acquisition for more than 320+ parcels. We also provided expert witness services and helped the County navigate legal challenges from property owners. Jacobs will capitalize on this experience while managing ROW and easement needs during the design to reduce potential legal challenges. Traffic Because of our experience managing the Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, as well as traffic studies associated with the Wilson — Boulevard Corridor Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Corridor Study, and Randall Boulevard Corridor Study projects, our team is already familiar with - 4 the traffic needs in the area. We will a perform traffic analyses at the intersections of Golden Gate Boulevard, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Immokalee Road to provide the appropriate intersection configurations that meet future traffic operation demands. Our traffic experience involves analyzing intersection control evaluation and traffic signal physical and operational requirements to optimize efficiency and safety, signal warrant and interconnection analyses, and final design plans, specifications, cost estimates, and construction contract documents. Our team has performed this type of work for cities, counties, and FOOT. Construction We have significant County experience on construction projects where we performed constructability and biddability reviews of our or other firms design plans. Our team includes licensed Florida contractors and inspectors who possess the critical local knowledge to serve the County, including construction phase and construction engineering and inspection experience on roadway, bridge, and sidewalk projects. Community/Business Coordination The surrounding land along the project corridor is primarily residential, so continuing the public outreach program we started with the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study will be a critical component to gaining consensus. Based on our experience with the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, the major public concerns with this project include ROW acquisition, pedestrian and bicycle safety, lighting, access management changes, flooding, and general aesthetics. We have successfully prepared for and held more than 100 Public Meetings, HOA Meetings, One on Ones, etc. (formal and informal) and worked with numerous stakeholders on other County projects in the area, including Vanderbilt Beach Road, Oil Well Road, Immokalee Road, and Randall Boulevard. We're Ready to Bring the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project to Life, Keeping in Mind Community Feedback from the Corridor Study Wilson REALLYneeds improvements for bicycles and pedestrians." r Golden Gate Estates residents need desperately an improvement on the roads. Every day traffic is congested." Please add sidewalks and bike lanes! This is a great corridor for walking and biking, but needs to be much safer." r Wilson bridge [flooded] my property 5 times over last 10 years ever since Immokalee Road was widened back in 2008." r The proposed changes would make the road much safer for bikers and pedestrians. / try to ride my bike as often as possible for exercise and to save money on gas." Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-9 Permitting and Regulatory Experience in Southwest Florida Because of our experience in Collier County and particularly the Golden Gate Estates area, we have valuable insight on latest agency concerns and processes, which allows us to streamline the application and review process and expedite wherever feasible. Potential permitting issues for this project include requirements for a wildlife shelf under the bridge over the Cypress Canal, wetland impact mitigation, panther habitat mitigation (secondary impacts), and impacts to other listed species. Based on our experience with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBRX) project, a Florida bonneted bat survey may/will be required. We have successfully worked with the SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP and prepared permitting plans that meet state and federal guidelines. Exhibit 1-2 demonstrates our team's experience with regulatory agencies (including those with jurisdiction in Collier County). EXHIBIT 1-2 Permitting Experience FEDERAL Our team has a proven track record of successfully working with local, Environmental Species and regional, state, and federal permitting and regulatory agencies. Performed 3 � c+ � Cr aCU COLLIER COUNTY PROJECTS ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ UJ ✓ ✓ W ✓ Q1� ✓ Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Collier Boulevard I (Golden Gate to Immokalee) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Collier Boulevard II (U.S. 41 to Davis) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Collier Boulevard III (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Blvd) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Vanderbilt Beach Road 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Immokalee Road Widening ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tree Farm Road Phase II ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pine Ridge Road Widening 1/11 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Palm River Bridge Replacement ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ OR Well Road ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ North Road Realignment ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 1-10 Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. While Jacobs does not maintain minority business status, we have teamed with Capital Consulting Solutions (CSS), a Naples -based MBE firm who has worked closely with our team and Collier County for many years. Jacobs is not a Certified Minority Business Enterprise (MBE). However, people are the heart of our business, and inclusion is one of our core values. We have an unparalleled focus on inclusion, and we have earned a positive reputation for assisting and protecting the interests of minority -owned businesses to promote competition and encourage free market opportunities for MBEs on our contracts both locally and globally. Along with building a team that does quality work, we involve MBE firms as team members who deliver significant and meaningful project assignments. Jacobs assigns our MBE partners work that will challenge and grow their technical capabilities and capacity. We believe that building diverse teams helps us unlock greater potential for ourselves, our clients, and our communities. Jacobs has an outstanding reputation for equal employment and workforce development. We've been recognized nationally with more than 30 awards for MBE/Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) contracting since 1999, including the Small Business Administration Dwight Eisenhower Award for Excellence and the Frances Perkins Vanguard Award —two of the most prestigious national awards. We've also received recognition throughout the state of Florida that includes exceeding our commitment to FOOT, where we have received an "A" rating for our DBE partnerships. Our industry leadership in mentoring MBE/DBE firms is something we pride ourselves on. V Minority Busines,, Certifiention Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC Is certified under the provisions of 287 and 295.187, Florida Statutes, for a period from: 06/29/2021 06/29/2023 4 1��meN a su,� 41,,,uI.IkP+imen�of Mvnwrmen�serv,u+ ss„wm�wknm MANAGEMEN For this project, we have teamed with Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS), a Naples -based MBE firm, to provide MOT, graphics, data collection, CAPITAL drone photography, and constructability review support. CCS is also a certified DBE/SBE firm. CCS is pre -qualified by FOOT in Group 3: Highway Design— Roadway, Group 6: Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies, Group 7: Traffic Operations Design, Group 10: Construction Engineering Inspection, and Group 13: Planning. Prior to founding CCS in 2017, the firm's principal, Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC, worked for Jacobs in the firm's Naples office. Adam worked side -by -side with Project Manager Bill Gramer and the entire Jacobs Naples -based staff on a daily basis. They collaborated on many projects in Collier County, including County's general services contracts, Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier Boulevard, Immokalee Road, Oil Well Road, and Tree Farm Road. This established working and personal relationship will mean seamless integration of the resources of CCS and Jacobs team members. FDOT BK,c WARD — GREATERORNNDO COUNTY��t AVIATION AUTHORITY ®:";:on°ir°T,O„ �— Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Certificate of Eligibility CAPITAL CONSULTING SOLUTIONS LLC MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF 49 CFR, PART 26 APPROVED NAICS CODES: 238990,541330,541340,541990 Samuel Febres (Sammy) Small Nosiness Deve(opmenf Manager Florida Department of Transportation HI. A_.H\Tampa WAirporttional � R Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 2-1 min ON Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. Our proposed project team has extensive experience on Wilson Boulevard and in the surrounding areas. We also have a demonstrated record of successful performance on many similar roadway projects in the County. Many of our team members played key roles in delivering the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study. Our team members have provided services for or within the County and have a valuable understanding of local conditions, priorities, regulations, and agencies and your preferred project delivery methods and quality standards. We bring technical expertise and professional experience from our work on these projects, which will help us efficiently address the key challenges that affect project success. As illustrated in Exhibit 3-1, our proposed team members routinely work together to deliver roadway improvement projects for the County and other Florida clients. Our team's long history of collaborating on similar projects provides you with a proven, integrated approach to successfully complete your project —on time and within budget. Unparalleled Knowledge of Collier County We bring an acute understanding of this project and existing conditions in the area that we've developed over decades of planning, studies, design, and construction management experience on County projects. In addition to delivering more than a dozen major roadway designs for Collier County, our team has completed hundreds of projects under general services contract assignments. Our task order work has consisted of transportation planning, traffic impact study reviews, developer contribution agreement reviews, roadway planning, roadway designs, complete streets, roundabouts, intersection designs, transit designs (bus shelter design, bus stop design),100 miles of sidewalks and bike lanes, 40 miles of pathways, boardwalk designs, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) surveys for 400+ County facilities, grant writing (i.e., Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery [TIGER], Safe Routes to Schools, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program [EECBG]), bridge designs, box culvert designs, pedestrian bridges, weir structural evaluations, 100+ miles of utility designs, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permitting, drainage design, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitting, environmental surveys (i.e., threatened and endangered species, wetlands, contamination), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permitting, consultant peer reviews, pavement evaluations (1,000+ miles), site and civil plans, architectural designs, facilities designs (i.e., electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC]), landfill design (i.e., master planning), construction engineering and inspection, and emergency response services. Jacobs has partnered with Collier County over the last 20 years to plan, design, and construct 15 roadway projects within the County requiring services directly related to the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design. Understanding the 20+ years of successful planning and design that has been completed to date and is still ongoing will allow the Jacobs team to deliver this project effectively and efficiently. EXHIBIT 3-1 A Decade of Experience Working Together Our team members have more than a decade of experience partnering on projects for the County, particularly in the Golden Gate Estates area, resulting in a truly integrated approach to the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design Project. ■ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study ■ Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension ■ Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Corridor Study ■ Collier Boulevard Widening Phase I, II, and III ■ Tree Farm Road Phase II ■ Oil Well Road Widening ■ Immokalee Road Randal Boulevard PD&E Study (FDOT) ■ Randall Boulevard Corridor Study (County) ■ Palm River Boulevard over Palm River Canal Bridge Replacement ■ Immokalee Road 4-Lane Widening ■ Immokalee Road 6-Lane Widening ■ Collier County Tree Farm Road Phase II ■ Collier County LAP Funded Golden Gate Collector Sidewalk Design and Post Design Services ■ Collier County LAP Funded Sunshine Boulevard Sidewalk and Pedestrian Bridge Design Jacobs E NE GAi t `iN G CAPITAL r ESA 1 Ardaman & Associates, Inc. _ Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-1 Past/Current Project Experience Within Project Area EXHIBIT 3-2 Experience Within Project Area =sue Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-2 The Jacobs Team Experience Within and/or Near the Project Corridor WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING CORRIDOR STUDY, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed:2022 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Colleen Ross, Diana Francois, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Tara Jones, Kevin Heldorfer, Guy Adams, Rick Gorsira, Vanessa Davis Under this study, our team evaluated alternatives to widen Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles) from a two-lane undivided roadway to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. We evaluated alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also included the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility, and bus stop enhancements. Additional project elements included changes to access at the intersections, drainage system upgrades, bridge replacement, utility relocation, and acquisition of right-of-way (ROW). As the prime consultant, our team performed access management, alternatives, drainage and pond siting, utilities, environmental, and ROW analyses; prepared a preliminary bridge type selection report; conducted a public involvement meeting; and prepared cost estimates. TAMIAMI WELLFIELD WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING IMPACT STUDY, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed:2022 ■ Key Team Members: Diana Francois, Bill Gramer, Bill Beddow, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford, Tao Fu, Tony Malone, Vanessa Davis Under this study, our team evaluated the impact of widening Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road on a critical 24-inch diameter raw water pipeline and associated raw water wells which account for 15 percent of the County raw water production. The team evaluated alternatives to relocate the raw water main and required modifications to 12 raw water wells. As the prime consultant, the Jacobs team developed conceptual level plans for the required piping, mechanical, electrical and communication improvements for each of the affected wells. They developed siting and drainage improvement plans, analyzed access challenges and developed a high level cost estimate for the recommended improvements. VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXTENSION, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed:2022 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Colleen Ross, Ken Wooten, Tom Ross, Adam Ahmad, DeeAngela Tjikueni, Nick De Ciccio, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford, Kevin Heldorfer, Rick Gorsira Jacobs managed design for the widening of Vanderbilt Beach Road, a new 7-mile road from east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to 16th Street Northeast. We led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic (MOT), structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. The project includes relocating a 2-mile section of the Cypress Canal to the south of the roadway and three new bridges at Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, and Orange Tree Canal. Minor improvements to existing intersecting streets will be included at Weber Boulevard, Danbury Boulevard, Massey Street, Douglas Street, Wilson Boulevard, 8th Street Northeast, 16th Street Northeast and a new intersection will be constructed to Greyhawk Trail for the Golf Club of The Everglades. Our team provided stormwater design for 16 drainage basins, including 11 wet detention ponds and 5 dry detention ponds to treat water quality prior to discharge to the canals. The project included continuous coordination with SFWMD conceptual Environmental Resource Program and construction permits. The project also included utility relocation and wastewater, potable, and raw water main design. The project included ROW acquisition of over 300 parcels comprising 314 acres. We conducted an environmental assessment, developing innovative approaches to wetland delineations and Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System mapping using a mobile data collection platform. The project included a listed species assessment and surveys as well as wetland and other surface water impacts. Jacobs successfully coordinated mitigation credits for the County to purchase from mitigation banks to address impacts to both Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-3 wetlands and the Florida panther. An environmental resource permit was issued by SFWMD in 2021 with a single request for additional information. We coordinated with USACE and FDEP and obtained a state 404 permit. IMMOKALEE ROAD AT RANDALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION PD&E STUDY, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: FOOT District 1, Florida ■ Completed:2019 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Colleen Ross, Tara Jones, Nick De Ciccio, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1 initiated a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) study to evaluate proposed improvements at the intersection of Immokalee Road (County Road 846) and Randall Boulevard in Collier County, Florida. Intersection capacity improvements are needed to accommodate the projected future traffic demand. The proposed project will improve future intersection operations and result in enhanced mobility and safety. Additionally, intersection improvements will increase regional transportation network connectivity, reduce crashes, improve operations on existing evacuation routes, and expand multi -modal access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic in the area. We prepared an initial alternatives technical memorandum to document the need for the project, developed intersection improvement alternatives, and conducted a preliminary comparative evaluation based on engineering constraints, environmental effects, and preliminary cost estimates. Proposed alternatives include at -grade alternatives and grade -separated alternatives to increase the intersection capacity. RANDALL BOULEVARD AND OIL WELL ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed:2019 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Colleen Ross, Tara Jones, Tom Ross, Nick De Ciccio, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford Jacobs performed this environmental and engineering study to evaluate potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road in Collier County. The improvements included development of an east -west corridor to reduce congestion, improve traffic flow, and accommodate future travel demand through 2045. We evaluated potential improvements to Randall Boulevard, Oil Well Road, Desoto Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard and potential corridors on a new alignment. We developed alternatives and comparatively evaluated the social and environmental effects and overall cost of each option. The study considered traffic operation improvements such as roundabouts, grade separated overpasses, frontage roadways, access management, and new traffic signal locations for the recommended alternative. The study process blended preliminary engineering, environmental impact assessments, public outreach, and agency coordination. Our team led public involvement, data collection and projections, corridor alternatives development, evaluation methodology and criteria development, corridor alternatives analysis and ranking, and selection of a preferred corridor alternative. VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD DESIGN (AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD TO COLLIER BOULEVARD), Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed:2007 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Ken Wooten, Tom Ross, Kevin Heldorfer, Adam Ahmad, Bill Beddow Jacobs managed the widening of 5.5 miles of an existing two-lane roadway to a six -lane, urban, divided roadway. Our team payed substantial attention to public concerns about local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. We led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. IMMOKALEE ROAD -COLLIER BOULEVARD ,4a INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS —FUTURE SPUI, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida �+ ■ Completed:2017 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Ken Wooten, Tom Ross, Kevin Heldorfer, Adam Ahmad, DeeAngela Tjikueni, Bill Beddow, Lev Zilberman, Rick Gorsira The project consisted of improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard intersection to provide additional capacity (triple -lefts) and extend Collier Boulevard north by about a half -mile. Our team provided roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-4 design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, Cocohatchee Canal Relocation (USACE NW permitting), prefabricated bridge crossing of Cocohatchee Canal, CR 951 box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design (36-inch water main, 30-inch water main (42-inch by 540-linear-foot directional drill), 16-inch force main, and 24-inch reclaimed water main), and coordinating transmission and distribution line relocation with Florida Power & Light (FPL). We led permitting with SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP; designed a boat ramp; and coordinated with adjacent developments such as NCH Hospital and CVS. The SFWMD permit included onsite treatment and attenuation and compensatory storage within the adjacent development to minimize costs and maximize treatment. Jacobs' Immokalee Road -Collier Boulevard Intersection design has been constructed in pieces to accommodate traffic needs and construction budgets. However, we designed the intersection to eventually accommodate a single point urban interchange (SPUI) at this location, with Immokalee Road passing over Collier Boulevard. IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed: September 2021 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Colleen Ross, Tom Ross, Kevin Heldorfer, Nick De Ciccio, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford, Vanessa Davis Jacobs conducted a congestion analysis for future (5-year and 20-year) conditions along a 2.3-mile segment of Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, including nine intersections. Our team obtained traffic counts, evaluated surrounding land use, and projected traffic forecasts along the corridor and at the intersections for existing (2019), 2025, and 2040 conditions. Due to the severe congestion projected and limited ROW available, we performed an alternatives analysis to evaluate both conventional and innovative alternatives at each of the intersections. The corridor was modeled in SYNCHRO software by Trafficware to conduct the analysis for delay, volume to capacity ratio, and level of service for existing and future conditions under the no -build and build scenarios. Types of innovative improvements evaluated at each of the nine intersections using the FDOT's Intersection Control Evaluation process and evaluated intersection types included a continuous -flow intersection (CFI), jug handle, SPUI, restricted crossing U-turn (R-CUT), diverging diamond interchange (DDI), median U-turn (MUT), and Continuous Green-T, as applicable. We prepared concepts for the recommended improvements at each intersection and along the corridor. Concepts with innovative solutions included: • SPUI at Livingston Road • A CFI at Strand Boulevard and Juliet Boulevard • A DDI at the 1-75 interchange • A CFI and SPUI at Logan Boulevard We prepared a video presentation, including animation for a CFI and DDI, and used it for public involvement activities. We also conducted a public meeting (virtual due to COVID-19 restrictions), and coordinated meetings with stakeholders such as homeowners associations (HOAs), business owners, Fire District, FDOT, Collier County Sheriff's Department, and social media. VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXTENSION CORRIDOR STUDY, Collier County, Florida It�:R� �l w' ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed:2006 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Ken Wooten, Tom _F. Ross, Kevin Heldorfer, Adam Ahmad, Bill Beddow We completed a corridor study to determine the feasibility of extending Vanderbilt Beach Road east into the Golden Gate Estates area. The corridor study limits were from Collier Boulevard (CR 951) east to Desoto Boulevard, a length of about 10 miles. The initial objective was to identify the existing and future transportation demands along the potential Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension corridor. We conducted extensive ROW investigations to determine potential impacts of 15 different corridor alternatives. Coordination with County ROW staff and community development was required to create a database of potential future impacts. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-5 OIL WELL ROAD WIDENING, Collier County, Florida ■ Client: Collier County, Florida ■ Completed:2012 ■ Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Ken Wooten, Randy Mock, Tom Ross, Kevin Heldorfer, Lev Zilberman Jacobs led design and permitting for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road. The project involved widening a two-lane rural section to a four -lane and six -lane urban section. We led extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. The permitting effort included drainage and environmental impacts as well as wildlife crossings for endangered species such as the Florida Panther. Our team prepared a bridge design report and design and plans for three bridge replacements, two box culvert extensions, and miscellaneous structures. All three bridge replacements involved three -span American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Type II beam superstructures on conventional pile bents. The bridge lengths are 132 feet,135 feet, and 150 feet, respectively. We designed the foundation and coordinated all the other aspects of the design, including quality assurance. Our team also performed load rating using load and resistance factor rating for box culvert classified as bridge culvert. Jacobs Collier County Roadway Design and Planning Experience Includes: We managed the design to widen Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes, converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the 1-75 interchange. A unique aspect of the project was redesigning "ems northbound on and off -ramps to accommodate dual left turn lanes. We provided complete roadway design and permitting services, signal design, roadway lighting, landscaping, traffic studies, and services during construction. We managed the widening of 4 miles of the existing four -lane, urban divided roadway. Tasks included public involvement, roadway design, r ^� drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), MOT, structural - design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Phase I (Green to Golden Gate Boulevard) has been constructed. Phase II (Main Golden Gate Canal to Green Boulevard) is currently at 60% Design and will be completed mid- 2023. Our team conducted a bridge location study to evaluate four potential bridge locations to replace the existing bridge at 251h Avenue Southwest, which will be removed to accommodate the Collier Boulevard Roadway Widening Project. We developed alternatives; evaluated existing and future traffic demand, traffic operational needs, access management requirements, multimodal needs, and physical and environmental constraints; and led a public involvement meeting. We managed development of design plans and specifications for widening the existing four -lane roadway to a six -lane facility, including four major intersections, as part of a roadway capacity improvements project for a 7-mile segment. We coordinated SFWMD, USACE and FDEP permits. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-6 Our team managed the widening design of existing two-lane roadway to a six -lane, urban divided roadway along a three-mile corridor. This project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. We led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), MOT, structural design, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. We managed the design of an 8.1-mile widening from two to six lanes (initial construction of four), converting the existing rural section • = to an urban section. Our team provided complete roadway design, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), and drainage design. We led design for the half -mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This two- lane roadway section links four roadways with a new roundabout. The new two-lane roadway includes sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes, and a new roundabout. The project included water main and force main design and permitting. Our design used three adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. We prepared design plans in MicroStation, conducted public involvement meetings, prepared permitting packages (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), and performed field calculations. Our team managed design to replace the existing 4-span precast slab Palm River Bridge, constructed in 1960 over the Palm River Canal, and reconstruct roadway approaches to accommodate the new structure while improving safety and adopting current FDOT standards. The - roadway design will enhance the safety on the intersections by improving the existing signing and pavement markings. The bridge development report investigated a 3-span (21.5 feet-27.5 feet-21.5 feet) precast Florida Slab Beam structure as well as a cast -in -place flat slab structure on conventional pile bents. Deterioration of existing timber piling was a major factor in the decision to replace the existing structure, so our team implemented a detour option instead of cutting the existing bridge and phased construction to eliminate potential risks and expedite work. Vibration and settlement monitoring was a key consideration due to proximity of residences. The recommended structure will use a cast -in -place superstructure upon careful constructability review with potential contractors, given the moderate span lengths and relatively short bridge length. The bridge typical section carries 11-foot traffic lane, 5.5-foot shoulders and raised 6.5-foot sidewalks on both sides. We implemented ADA requirements in the design. We conducted a comprehensive analysis to determine the type, design, and location of proposed future improvements to Collier Boulevard from U.S. 41 to Immokalee Road, a distance of approximately 15 miles. As part of the study, we developed and analyzed various typical sections and roadway geometry and evaluated drainage and utility adjustment requirements, site constraints, preliminary environmental, and right-of-way requirements for a six -lane urban divided section with bike lanes, sidewalks, and stormwater management facilities. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-7 References Client reference forms for projects similar in nature to the scope of the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design project can be found on the following pages. 1 Project Name Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study Client Collier County Score 100 2 Tamiami WeRfield Wilson Blvd. Widening Impact Study Collier County 100 3 Immokalee Road/Collier Boulevard Intersection Improvements Collier County 99 4 Palm River Bridge Replacement Collier County 100 5 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design (Collier Boulevard to 161h Street NE) Collier County 100 6 Josie Billie Highway Improvements Seminole Tribe of Florida 100 7 Randall Corridor Study Collier County 98 3. Past Performance Reference Form #1: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study �o��. Admintsrabve Services DepaMleM Proarement seMaes D'rvis'ron Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQU/RED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening Reference Questionnaire for Jacobs En¢ineerin¢ (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name:Trinity Scott— Department Head Company: Collier County Transportation Management Services (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Department (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiuel again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored 110" Project Description: Wilson Blvd. Corridor Study Completion Date: Project Budget: $375,750 Project Number of Days: Item Criteria Score must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 Client: Collier County Relevance: Our role: Prime Size: 3.2 miles Key personnel: Bill Gramer; Colleen Ross; Diana Francois; Nathan Lunsford; Felicia Kirby; Tara Jones; Kevin Heldorfer; Guy Adams; Rick Gorsira; Vanessa Davis Project description and services provided On this study, our team evaluated alternatives to widen Wilson Boulevard from a 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway with curb and gutter from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). The study involved evaluating alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also included adding sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility and bus stop enhancements. Additional project elements included changes to access at the intersections, drainage system upgrades, replacement of the existing bridge, utility relocation, and right-of-way acquisition. As the prime consultant, our team provided access management analysis, alternatives ✓ Comprehensive study to provide recommendations for the proposed project ✓ Unmatched understanding of project site and design constraints ✓ In-depth understanding of utility impacts analysis, preliminary bridge type selection report, drainage and pond siting analysis, utility analysis, environmental analysis, right-of-way analysis, a public involvement meeting, and cost estimates. Jacobs' experience conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study gives us unique insight into the Wilson Boulevard widening design. We have considered multiple scenarios in depth and bring unmatched project site knowledge that will allow us to accelerate project kickoff. Key subconsultants and delivery partners ✓ Johnson Engineering - Survey ✓ Ardaman & Associates, Inc. - Geotechnical Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-9 Intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Blvd Feedback from public meeting participants: Bill Gramer with Collier County staff during the Tomiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study field meeting rThank you for your help and continued help with being proactive in these growth demand problems! I strongly believe this departments) [is] the most productive and best results producing department in all of Collier County areas of responsibilities." Proper well house driveway access along Wilson Boulevard for utility and maintenance vehicles must be incorporated into design Very informative meeting,• Hoping to be kept in the loop as the project develops." Project Manager Bill Gramer interfacing with members of the community at the Wilson Boulevard Members of the community interacting with renderings at the Wilson Boulevard Widening Widening Corridor Study public meeting Corridor Study public meeting Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-10 Jacobs Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road "Y+ 3 ab 4 _ n { January 2022 Come-r Cou"ty Growth Management Department s� Cover page of Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study report Wilson Boulevard Widening VUBLIC INFORMATION FACTSHEET Collier County is c,ndudi,g the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for wid- ning Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane (existing) to a four -lane roadway with — antl gutter, fmm Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). This study Involves the evaluation of alt,m,tiv, alignments to improve mobility, enhance safely, and accommodate future tramc volumes, while avoiding or min- zingimpacts b mecommunity antl natural environment The Recommended Alternative will be presented to the Collier County Board of County Com W.... nem (BCC) In late 2021 or eedv 2022 Mr eomovel. Purpose and Need+ � wid,ning of Wilson Boulevard Is needed to improve safety, t-, flow, network is the Golden Gate Estates area as follow Immokalee Road whicM1 can no longer be widened, ezperiences significant congestion; Golden Gate _ Boulevard is polity constrained to four lanes and '- saped.d..s congestion Vandaftft Beach Road(VBR) Extension which will -- ss Wilson Boulevard between 10th Avenue NW and 121h Avenue NW, will help relieve congestion along Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boule- v.rd Travelers will use Wilson Boulevard to access VBR Extension, and therafare more trafic is anbdp..d on Wilson Boulevard Wilson Boulevard will also act as a parallel traffic reliever In Collier Boulevard a the west Wilson Boulevard will b. the first 4-lane roadway east of Collier Boulevard; there are no other 4-lane nosh -south roadways east of Collier Boulevard today Proposed Typical Section proposed ryPiwl section includes 2, 11-n-wide travel lama in each tliredion. Atltlilional project lmprove- Atatobeconsideredmclaa mar moaea aria mnlfimoaal mdfifiea eacn as: ddition of a 10-ft-wide shared -use pathway na.os ww.. long me east ads Addition or s-n-wide Study Schedule dedicated bike lanes ade.rd to m. nosh- 3 i antl south -bound travel £ f ■ lanes i i, Addition of a 8-n-wide 999 IIa sidewalk on the west I I Ee 1 Addition of bus stop puss at me ei et ng b tops ismproyementa'n_��[ �... ,.....� m�� Dranag. upgrades to.... J're pq v1 me overarl wal .... tar lethea Near4-1a e b Idge ova u.e..�•.aro- the Cypress Canal .1_1e..1,j -.,.,,e...,a-0 Dpae this project include lighting? The project proposes lighting improvements at the Intersections along Wilson Boulevard to ,at FDOT crite- ia. There Is a survey and comment form online and available as handouts at tonight's meeting for feedback on whether you would prefer Ilghting along the ddra projed condor or at the Intersections (or cross streets) only. It looks like you will be impacting my property. Will I be compensated? TM1e Collier County Right of Way Acquisition Section of the County Growth Management Deparinu nt will con - tad -la dad property owners when the right-of-way phase for the pctb rojeeginsrs .PeonnelfromtheCoun- ty Right of Way Acquisition Section are here at tonight's meeting to answer your questions abaut me process far handling project impacts to residences. Nil a noise study be Included in this project? All impacs are reviewed in the ,amen of the needed improvement, including noise. A noise study will be performed during the tlesign phase; M1owaver, noise walls are not anticipated based on the proximity of the road and the access required to me numerous tlriveways antl cross streets along me project condor. What ere the ch.n... t. access maaagemeat? The proposed typical section includes a r,lead 22-foot-wide median. Therefore, U-turn accommodations are proposed at each intersection, similar to Golden Gate Boulevard. Left-turn—ly and right -turn -only lanes re also proposed at each intersection along W Ison Boulevard. Between Golden Gate Boulevard and 101h Avenue NW, U-turn a=..,d,ti,n. ere proposed approximately every 0.3 miles since there are no inter- sedionslcross streets along mis segment. What are the next steps for the project? After me receipt of all public comments, the project wh opts and documents will be updated to reflect pub- lic input, and the finalized recommendations will be submitted to the BCC for approval. Once approved, the Corridor Study planning phase of the project is complete. The ned phases that follow are the project tlesign, right-of-way acquishan, and constmcd- TM1e County's Five-year Work Program includes trading for the design and right-of-way acqulsitlon phases beginning In Fiscal Year 2022, and funding for the condructlon phase in Fiscal Year 2024. Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Factsheet Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-11 Reference Form #2: Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study SI Administrative Services Department Pmwrement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACHREOUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs En ineerin (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Grainer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Tom Sivert, PE Company: Collier County Public Utilities (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Engineering and Project Management Division (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email:Tom.Sivert@colliercoun I. ov> FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5376 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firn/indivdival again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored "0." Project Description: Tamiami Wellfield/Wilson Blvd. Completion Date: January 2022 Widening Impact Study Project Budget: Design $96,514 Project Number of Days: 150 Item Criteria Score must be corn leted 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; 10 invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS SivertTo Digitallysigned by SivertTom Date: 2022.06.23 m 11:35:08-04'00' Size: 2.3 miles of water main relocation and 9 well sites Gramer, Bill Beddow, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Tao Fu, Tony Malone, Vanessa oject description and services provided cobs performed an impact assessment the Wilson Boulevard widening on the isting County well houses, vaults, and sociated infrastructure on the west side the roadway. Our evaluation included commendations to allow facilities to remain lerational and accessible after the proposed adway widening was implemented. The nd civil impacts to avoid conflicts with xisting infrastructure by raising the proposed roadway approximately 3 feet higher, such as driveway relocation in accordance with Critical project component with the Wilson Boulevard Widening design Evaluated raw water main relocation requirements due to roadway widening Evaluated well site improvements to accommodate roadway widening the truck crane service radius. The project included conceptual level sketches with the recommended improvements for discharge piping relocation from the well houses and vaults, blow -off valve relocation, electrical and fiber replacement, utility easements required, and the crossing at the Cypress Canal in accordance with SFWMD criteria. Project was completed approximately $12K under budget! Key subconsultants and delivery partners ✓ N/A Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-12 Jacobs team members assessing the existing well equipment Bill Gromer discussing with Collier County staff solutions for Well House 14 and its proximity to a The existing electrical and mechanical components were assessed as part of the Impact Study The crane outrigger footprint is being measured to incorporate a proper well house driveway residential driveway access design for access management along Wilson Boulevard Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-13 3. Past Performance Reference Form #3: Immokalee Road/Collier Boulevard Intersection Improvements ^Co= C___l Y Administrative Services Department Pr—t 5—oN�s Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs En ineerin (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Granter, PE, MCP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Laurie Beard— Projet Manager Company: Collier County PUD Monitoring GMD (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satiated (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdival again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored "0." Project Description: Immokalee Road/Collier Boulevard Completion Date: Dec 2017 Intersection Improvements Project Budget: Design $625,000/Const. $7.75M Project Number of Days: Item Criteria Score must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, foal invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 99 Client: Collier County Our role: Prime Size: One-half mile extension Key personnel: Bill Gramer, Ken Wooten, Tom Ross, Bhushan Godbole, Kevin Heldorfer, Adam Ahmad, DeeAngela Tjikueni, Bill Beddow, Lev Zilberman, Rick Gorsira Project description and services provided Jacobs designed improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard Intersection to provide additional capacity (triple -lefts) and extend Collier Blvd north by about a half mile. Our work included roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, Cocohatchee Canal Relocation (USACE NW permitting), prefabricated bridge crossing of Cocohatchee Canal, CR 951 box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design (36-inch water main, 30-inch water main [42-inch by 540-linear- foot directional drill],16-inch force main, 24-inch reclaimed water main), coordination with FPL for transmission and distribution line relocation, boat ramp design, and coordination with adjacent developments including NCH Hospital and CVS. Permits Relevance: ✓ Next adjacent major intersection west of Wilson Boulevard and Immokalee Road intersection ✓ Experience designing and coordinating permitting for improvements crossing the Cocohatchee Canal included SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP. The SFWMD permit included onsite treatment and attenuation and compensatory storage within adjacent development to minimize costs and maximize treatment. During the past 10 years, the Immokalee Road -Collier Boulevard Intersection has been designed (by Jacobs) and constructed in pieces to accommodate traffic needs and construction budgets. However, we designed the intersection to eventually accommodate a single point urban interchange at this location, with Immokalee Road passing over Collier Boulevard. Key subconsultants and delivery partners ✓ RWA Consulting, Inc. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-14 Directional drill under Collier Boulevard Placement of CON/SPAN I �s p Interim Collier Boulevard and Immohalee Road intersection Completed Collier Boulevard and Immohalee Road intersection Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-15 3. Past Performance Reference Form #4: Palm River Bridge Replacement DocuSign Envelope ID: 3571436A-5DBA-424A-8787-4C694B2FB736 c-11L cmtnty AdminWrative Services Department Procurements__D'r. _ Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACHREOU/RED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs En �neerin (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Name: Mario A. Puente, PE-CGC, Senior Project Manager. Company: Collier County Transportation Engineering (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdival again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored "0." Project Description: Palm River Blvd. Over Palm River Completion Date: August Canal Bridge Replacement Project Budget: $560,680 Project Number of Days: Item Criteria Score must be coin leted 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minhnize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Qualityof work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 10o Coo�esie�.a ey: M uvie C QB3.- t WO1MteC9351B3... Client: Collier County Relevance: Our role: Prime Size: 11 -foot traffic lane, 5.5-foot shoulders, and raised 6.5-foot sidewalks Key personnel: Bill Gramer, Bhushan Godbole, Nick De Ciccio Project description and services provided Jacobs designed the Palm River Bridge Replacement, which involves replacement of the existing 4-span precast slab bridge constructed in 1960 over the Palm River Canal and reconstruction of roadway approaches to accommodate the new structure while improving safety and adopting current FDOT standards. The roadway design will enhance safety on the Palm River Boulevard intersections of Palm View Drive and Coral Vine Drive by improving existing signing and pavement markings. The Bridge Development Report investigated a 3-span (21.5-27.5'-21.5') precast Florida Slab Beam structure and a cast -in -place flat slab structure on conventional pile bents. Deterioration of existing timber piling was a major factor in the decision to replace the existing structure, so our team implemented a detour option instead of cutting the existing bridge and phased construction to eliminate ✓ Bridge design within canal system and SFWMD design parameters ✓ Experience coordinating on permitting with FDEP/ACOE and SFWMD on environmental and bridge criteria ✓ In-depth knowledge working on Bridge Development and Bridge Hydraulic Reporting potential risks and expedite work. Vibration and settlement monitoring was a key consideration due to proximity of residences in the project vicinity. After careful constructability review with potential contractors, our team recommended a structure that uses a cast -in -place superstructure given the moderate span lengths and relatively short bridge length. The bridge typical section carries an 11-foot traffic lane, 5.5-foot shoulders, and raised 6.5-foot sidewalks on both sides. We implemented Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements in the design to accommodate the pedestrian sidewalk. The constructed cost for the bridge and roadway is estimated at $1.7 million. Key subconsultants and delivery partners ✓ Johnson Engineering ✓ Forge Engineering Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-16 Palm River Bridge (Bridge No. 034046) prior to construction Aerial drone photo of the completed Palm River Bridge (Bridge No. 034046) Jacobs providing Post -Design Services for the Palm River Bridge construction Palm River Bridge utilizes a 3-span (21.5 feet-27.5 feet-21.5 feet) and cast -in -place superstructure Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-17 Reference Form #5: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design (Collier Boulevard to 16t" Street NE) DocuSign Envelope ID: 22C1F878-E2C8-47B5-BFB2-6CB1874782B2 c-11L cmtnty AdminWrative Services Department Procurements__D'r. _ Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACHREOU/RED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs En �neerin (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Name: Mario A. Puente, PE-CGC, Senior Project Manager. Company: Collier County Transportation Engineering (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdival again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored "0." Project Description: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Completion Date: Design March 2022 (Collier Blvd. to 161 Street N.E.) Project Budget: $5,667,445 Project Number of Days: Item Criteria Score must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 CMdvia Q Ptu.K& BW1Aat8G935a83 . v(��I � ELM_#=min L ��fIIIIII.I��' E-IHII1f!11kid, - >at� I��iia:��6�llf5a!� • Client: Collier County Our role: Prime Size: 7 miles of roadway and 314 acres Key personnel: Bill Gramer; Colleen Ross; Ken Wooten; Tom Ross; Adam Ahmad, DeeAngela Tjikueni, Nick De Ciccio; Felicia Kirby; Nathan Lunsford; Kevin Heldorfer; Rick Gorsira Relevance: ✓ Creates a new intersection with Wilson Boulevard within the project limits ✓ In-depth knowledge of the Golden Project description and services provided The Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) Extension project involves widening and designing a new 7-mile road from east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to 16th Street Northeast. Our team - �"�'^ " ROAIXYAY RUNS a <OxSr. 1(rx Sr. FO. co— co— RRaecr eAnaceR: 100% SUBMfTTAI Gate Estates area conditions, including hydrology and permitting with FDEP/ ACOE and SFWMD on environmental and bridge criteria, wetland mitigation, and canal relocation ✓ Bridge design within canal system and SFWMD design parameters ✓ Experience working with the County for ROW acquisition and the settlement process ✓ Familiarity with Golden Gate Estates area residents' concerns developed over numerous public involvement meetings led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, traffic maintenance, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-18 The project involves relocating a 2-mile section of the Cypress Canal to a location south of the roadway and included three new bridges at Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, and Orange Tree Canal. Our design includes minor improvements to existing intersecting streets at Weber Boulevard, Danbury Boulevard, Massey Street, Douglas Street, Wilson Boulevard, 8th Street Northeast, and 16th Street Northeast and a new intersection to Greyhawk Trail for the Golf Club of The Everglades. We provided stormwater management at 16 drainage basins, including 11 wet detention ponds and 5 dry detention ponds to treat water quality prior to discharge to the canals. We coordinated regularly with SFWMD on the conceptual ERP permit and construction permit. We also provided utility relocation and design for wastewater, potable, and raw water mains. The project included ROW acquisition with over 276 parcels across 314 acres. Jacobs prepared an environmental assessment, developed innovative approaches to wetland delineations, and performed FLUCCS mapping using a mobile data collection platform. We prepared a listed species assessment, conducted surveys, and assessed wetland and other surface water impacts. We coordinated mitigation credits for the County to help them purchase from mitigation banks from impacts to both wetlands and the Florida panther. An environmental resource permit was issued by SFWMD in 2021 with a single request for additional information (RAI). We coordinated with USACOE and FDEP and obtained a state 404 permit. Key subconsultants and delivery partners ✓ Ardaman & Associates, Inc. ✓ Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. ✓ Capital Consulting Solutions ✓ Johnson Engineering, Inc ✓ RWA Engineering Pathway Westbound Lanes Median Eastbound Lanes Typical section of Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension: Segment No. 1 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-19 Reference Form #6: Josie Billie Highway Improvements Collie^= C;_u Iy Administrative Services DepaN ent Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REOU/RED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening Reference Questionnaire for: (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Name: Fabian Lefler —Director Capital Projects Company: Seminole Tribe of Florida (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdival again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored 110" Project Description: Josie Billie Highway Improvements Completion Date: 2018 Project Budget: $300,000 Project Number of Days: Item Criteria Score must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 Client: Seminole Tribe of Florida Our role: Prime Size: 5.8 miles Key personnel: Bill Gramer, Adam Ahmad Project description and services provided The Josie Billie Highway Improvements Project included the reconstruction of 5.8 miles of Josie Billie Highway. Major components of the project included mobilization, MOT, clearing, earthwork, milling, resurfacing, shoulder reconstruction, installation of guardrail, and signing and marking. The reconstruction project added these improvements along Josie Billie Highway to mitigate its design deficiencies and improve overall safety. Relevance: ✓ Maintenance of traffic (MOT) expertise ✓ Roadway design Key subconsultants and delivery partners ✓ Capital Consulting Solutions Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-20 3. Past Performance 11 Jacobs AMC% V-15 3. Past Performance Reference Form #7: Randall Boulevard and OR Well Road Corridor Study Cowty Adminsrafive Services DeparaneM Procurement Services DN Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REOUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs Engineering (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Grainer, PE, AICP. (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Trinity Scott — Department Head Company: Collier County Transportation Management Services (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Department (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov FAX: Telephone: 239.252.6064 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdival again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored 110." Project Description: Randall Boulevard Corridor Study Completion Date: 2019 Project Budget: Design: $662,496 Project Number of Days: 1065 Item Criteria Score must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10+ 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 8 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 98 Client: Collier County Our role: Prime Size: 5.3 miles Key personnel: Bill Gramer, Colleen Ross, Tara Jones Project description and services provided Jacobs evaluated potential improvements to Randall Boulevard, Oil Well Road, DeSoto Boulevard, and Everglades Boulevard and potential corridors on a new alignment. Our study evaluated widening the 5.3 mile stretch of Randall Boulevard from an existing 2-lane facility to a 4-lane or 6-lane facility based on traffic needs. Our study included public involvement, data collection and projections, corridor alternatives development, evaluation methodology and criteria development, corridor alternatives analysis and ranking, and selection of a preferred corridor alternative. We documented these elements individually in report form and prepared an Relevance: ✓ Unique knowledge of the operational and safety complexities of intertwining the Wilson Boulevard and Immokalee Road intersection design with the improvements at the Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road intersection ✓ In-depth understanding of Golden Gate Estates area stakeholders Executive Summary Report that included an overview of the corridor study findings and recommendations. We held three public meetings, giving us an in- depth understanding of Golden Gate Estates area residents' concerns and questions. Key subconsultants and delivery partners ✓ Johnson Engineering, Inc. — Natural Resources Evaluation ✓ Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. — Archaeological, Historical and Cultural Assessment ✓ Environmental Science Associates (ESA) — Noise Study Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-22 The existing Randall Boulevard and Immohalee Road intersection The existing Randall Boulevard and Immohalee Road intersection Plan view of proposed conceptual layout for the Randall Boulevard Flyover North Collier Fire Rescue District - Station #10 is a short distance from the intersection; EMS access management was a focus point during the study Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 3-23 EVALUATION CRITERIA NO.4 Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements _ 3102 rh..l, ram, ti 7 - ■ Project Approach Our technical approach is based on a comprehensive understanding of required roadway design elements, bicycle and pedestrian needs, CAT infrastructure, existing and proposed site conditions, proposed development, access management, constructability issues, utility relocations, drainage requirements, and "Critical Path" schedule items, as defined in Section 1. The following sections further describe the design elements of our project approach and key considerations. Roadway Design The existing Wilson Boulevard runs within a 100-foot ROW easement. To satisfy the project's purpose and need and design criteria, Jacobs identified the need fora 165 feet ROW, with additional Wilson Boulevard Construction Typical Section (Looking North) easements adjacent to Well Houses/Vaults. Because of the multiple constraints along the corridor, including the existing well infrastructure and proximity of residential structures to the roadway, our approach recommends ROW/easement from both sides of the road (30 feet to the west and 35 feet to the east). The proposed "Urban" typical section will require a "saw -tooth" profile (0.30% +/-). To accommodate cross slope and the base clearance requirements between the roadway base layer and seasonal high-water table, and to facilitate stormwater hydraulics, the vertical profile will change significantly (increasing approximately 2 to 3.5 feet - varies). The vertical alignment will be optimized to avoid the existing County production wells and provide smooth transitions to cross streets. The CAT Bus Stop locations will be modified to improve multimodal access along the corridor. Relocating to proposed right turn locations will improve safety and operations. The Wilson Boulevard improvements north of Immokalee Road will be required to transition the roadway from a 4-lane facility back down to two lanes. The roadway improvements, including the box culvert widening/replacement north of Immokalee Road, will need to consider the ultimate footprint of the future Fly -Over project at Randall Boulevard to minimize throw away in the future. This will be coordinated with the County early in the design process to ensure impacts are identified and ROW needs are determined. Access management will accommodate the adjacent residential driveways, businesses, and future developments along the corridor. For proper traffic operations and accommodation of residential and commercial properties, Jacobs proposes three U-turns between Golden Gate Boulevard and 10th Avenues NE/NW, with U-turn accommodations (additional pavement) to achieve a proper turning radius. The two gas station driveways at the northeast corner of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard do not meet the current design criteria spacing requirements. In addition, the proposed Estates Shopping Center at NW corner of Golden Gate Blvd and Wilson will require new access management considerations. Jacobs will assist the County in coordinating with the property owners to identify access alternatives. Structures This project includes the replacement of existing Bridge #034032 over the Cypress Canal, and modification of Bridge Culvert #034056 over the Cocohatchee Canal, as well as design of miscellaneous structures. The structural designs will be in accordance with FDOT design standards and guidelines. Jacobs project: Bessent Road Bridge Replacement, Jacksonville, FL. Florida Slab Beam superstructure on conventional pile bents. The existing Bridge #034032 cannot be widened. The replacement solutions should be cost effective while addressing temporary traffic control, hydraulics, adjacent driveway transitions, SFWMD compliance, and wildlife accommodations. The optimal bridge length and low member elevation will be determined during the bridge hydraulics evaluation in conjunction with the anticipated future widening of Cypress Canal, and documented in the Bridge Hydraulics Report. A preliminary bridge layout was prepared during the Corridor Study and coordinated with SFWMD. Because substructures should not be located mid -canal, the design will be a 1- or 3-span configurations. The replacement bridge type will be determined during the Bridge Development Report (BDR) phase. However, we anticipate probable structure types to be investigated are Cast -in -Place (CIP) flat slabs, Florida Slab Beams (FSBs) with composite topping, Florida I -Beams (FIBS), and AASHTO Type II beams. We believe superstructures such as CIP flat slab or FSBs with composite topping provide inherent advantages. For substructures, we recommend using conventional CIP bent caps on prestressed concrete piles. The existing Bridge Culvert #034056 requires at a minimum widening to the west to accommodate the additional roadway width. Our goal will be to maximize the reuse of existing culvert which could result in $1.0 M cost reduction. However, the future fly -over from Randall Blvd will require this box culvert to be relocated. Consideration should be given to acquiring the necessary ROW now and relocating the culvert and small section of canal with this project. Maintenance of Traffic Development of MOT plans must incorporate regional and local traffic needs to safely direct traffic through the work zone. MOT will consider transitions at the major intersections including Immokalee Road, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Golden Gate Boulevard, signage, signalization, etc. A key consideration for this project's MOT is the significant change in the roadway's new vertical profile. Phased construction will be required. Phase 1 will keep the existing Wilson Boulevard travel lanes open to traffic while the two new lanes are constructed to the west. The vertical change between the existing travel lanes and the newly constructed lanes will be too steep for drivers to cross. Therefore, the intersections/cross streets will remain open with proper sloping, for drivers to access safely through the construction zone to their driveways. Phase 2 shifts traffic to the two new travel lanes while the existing travel lanes are reconstructed. Again, cross streets/intersections will be opened to access safely through the construction zone to their driveways. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 4-1 The bridge proposed � �I��- 1AWAI JW2""��6 in two phas s. The benefit of using the precast s 11 type superstructure with a short span, is that crane placement and material delivery are not anticipated to generate any special access needs. Construction access • Construct west half of new bridge • Maintain traffic on existing bridge can be accommodated within the existing ROW, and primarily from the bridge ends. The unimpeded, safe movement of emergency vehicles and school bus traffic will be a special concern. There Move traffic to new bridge are three Collier Area Transit (CAT) routes (19 22 and r r •opentremo a is to bridge •Open traffic to both sides of bridge 28), six bus stops, and a school bus stop shelter located on the west side of Wilson Boulevard, approximately Mob 600 feet south of the intersection with Golden Gate Boulevard. We will coordinate directly with the r Collier County Public Schools Board and CAT on the • Construct east half of new bridge construction sequencing. Bridge phasing Some night-time operations may be necessary to minimize traffic impacts and enable the contractor to complete the work as quickly as possible. The use of black base may be recommended in some areas to reduce construction time. Drainage Because of the length of the project, flat topography, conveyance feasibility limitations, and hydraulic gradient concerns, dividing onsite basins into multiple segments that drain to multiple stormwater ponds along the project is required. Six to Seven ponds are anticipated for the corridor. Our team has already explored innovative stormwater treatment strategies including combining wet and dry detention ponds to meet SFWMD water quantity and water quality criteria including dry pre-treatment and nutrient removal requirements for North Golden Gate Sub -Basin (WBID 32785) which is impaired for dissolved oxygen, with total nitrogen as the causative pollutant. Ponds must be located a minimum of 100 Feet from Well heads (SFWMD Criteria). During the study, Jacobs ranked pond sites based on a variety of factors including design criteria, production well locations, private well locations, available parcel area, proximity to outfall, and basin limits. It is imperative that the Final pond siting effort begin at NTP, as it is the most critical path for this project. Keeping in mind that permitting the stormwater ponds and associated impacts could take close to a year, pond siting must be completed early in the project to meet your 18-month design schedule. Additionally, ROW acquisition of the pond site parcels could also take up to a year after Sketch and Descriptions are prepared. Runoff from Wilson Boulevard would drain to a closed storm sewer system along curb and gutter to convey to the proposed pond sites for water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation. The existing roadway ditches will be relocated to the edges of the typical section to maintain existing offsite drainage patterns. The ditches will also maintain the hydraulic connections to the existing side street ditches. Based on our field reviews, the existing side street ditches are not properly conveying water to the canal system, and some of the side streets lack conveyance at the outfalls due to years of sediment build up. The project is anticipated to impact approximately 44 acres of 100-year floodplain, where no net encroachment is required. While the roadway improvements will reduce floodplain storage, our preliminary analysis demonstrates that the stormwater ponds and roadside swales will provide enough storage compensation to satisfy SFWMD requirements. Surveying and Right -of -Way During the study, our team set survey control and completed the initial topographic survey. As a result, final design survey and Sketch and Descriptions preparation can begin early in the design process. Surveying and ROW mapping are also critical path elements for this project. Sketch and Descriptions survey of the corridor and pond site parcels is needed to inform the ROW acquisition process. ROW acquisition, which can take up to a year to complete, cannot begin until pond sites are selected, and the Sketch and Descriptions are complete. We understand the critical paths of this project and will begin working with Robert Bosch/ROW Department early in the project to coordinate pond sites and survey results. This early coordination will allow us to complete the design in 18 months. Coordination with SFWMD will be required during the design phase for additional property needs associated with the bridge replacement over the Cypress Canal, particularly if SFWMD requires a boat ramp. Additional utility easements west of the proposed ROW at the County water production well sites are required to accommodate the improvements needed as a result of the roadway widening project. Utilities During the study, Jacobs identified 10 utility agency owners (UAOs) within the study area. Major utilities include overhead electric (FP&L), County production wells and associated infrastructure (24 inch RWM), and a gas line (TECO). This project was designed to avoid significant impacts to the County production well infrastructure. The Wilson Blvd Well House and Infrastructure project will relocate the County 24-inch raw water main to the proposed western ROW line. The TECO gas line should be relocated to the east, under or immediately adjacent to the pathway to avoid conflicts with pond outfall piping. The FP&L overhead electric will need to be relocated to the proposed eastern ROW line. The County would like the power distribution lines to the production well sites to be relocated underground to avoid overhead clearance conflicts when cranes service the well sites. Jacobs will coordinate with FP&L. The existing aerial pipe crossing over the Cypress Canal will be relocated to the west and be subaqueous (directional drilling). Johnson Engineering will perform subsurface utility exploration to better identify utility locations. Physical utility locates (pot -holing) will be done immediately in certain critical areas to ensure proper location identification. Advance utility notification letters will be sent to the utility companies immediately upon NTP. Through early identification and resolution of potential conflicts, we will be able to reduce impacts to the design schedule. Upon NTP, letters will be distributed to local utilities informing them of the project. Once prepared, 30% plans will be sent to the utility companies, so they can confirm the location of their utilities, modify locations shown on the plans, and provide desired locations for relocations and future planned utilities. A utility meeting will be held shortly thereafter to discuss potential conflicts and give UAOs Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 4-2 sufficient time to begin planning their redesigns (if necessary). Utility meetings will be held again after 60% submittal and utility work schedules will be requested prior to finalizing bid plans. Signing and Pavement Marking/Signals Signing and pavement markings and signal plans will be designed to comply with the requirements established in the latest FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards and the FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The principle of positive vehicular guidance and consistency of sign messages will be followed when performing the signing and pavement marking design. Roadside signs will conform to Elder User Guidelines. In addition, signal interconnect will coordinate all signals within the corridor to Vanderbilt Beach Road. Environmental Impacts Wetland impacts and threatened and endangered (T&E) species impacts are anticipated. Because this is already a developed corridor, the majority of wetland impacts are primarily associated with the pond sites needed. Jacobs performed field reviews to determine which undeveloped parcels had substantial wetlands to inform preliminary pond siting decisions. Therefore, we can anticipate UMAM scoring of impacted parcels to efficiently estimate mitigation costs. Other surface water impacts (minimal and temporary) are anticipated with both the bridge replacement/widening at Cypress Canal and extending the culvert widening/ replacement at the Cocohatchee Canal. Review of T&E species and habitat within the project area and particularly the pond sites, indicates the following have a high potential of occurrence: Florida panther, Florida bonneted bat, wood stork, big cypress fox squirrel, and ghost orchid. The project limits north of the Cypress Canal falls within the Panther Habitat Secondary Zone and will require mitigation. A Florida Bonneted Bat Acoustic/Roost Survey will likely be required by USFWS at pond sites with potential roosting habitat. As soon as pond sites are determined, Jacobs will coordinate with the agencies to expedite any requirements. Because Bridge #034032 is on the edge of Panther Habitat Secondary Zone, wildlife shelf accommodations may be required for panther and other species crossings. Additionally, the existing Bridge #034032 will be tested for asbestos, lead paint, and creosote, and appropriate mitigation will be recommended based on the results. Permitting Early coordination with the permitting agencies is also a critical path for this project, in order to meet the 18-month schedule. Anticipated permits include an Individual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) through SFWMD, SFWMD ROW Permit(s) (Bridge, Box Culvert and Sub -aqueous RWM crossing), and a Section 404 Individual Permit through FDEP. The ERP and Section 404 Program review will be submitted as ajoint application to SFWMD and FDEP for determinations of wetlands, other surface waters, and listed species impacts. We can streamline the process of coordinating with US Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the mitigation banks on contract with the County, since we are aware of the requirements and concerns of permitting agencies, and just successfully performed this process on VBRX. Jacobs will present the project at a monthly County/SFWMD coordination meeting early in the project. A pre -application meeting with SFWMD will be requested prior to the 30% milestone to discuss concepts for conveyance and treatment. This coordination provides the design team agency feedback prior to establishing the ultimate drainage design, expediting the design process and acquisition of parcel takes for stormwater ponds. The SFWMD permit is anticipated to take between 6 and 8 months. FDEP permit is anticipated to take between 9 to 12 months and is a critical path for the project. In order to meet the 18-month project schedule, Jacobs will prepare a set of 60% Permitting Plans within 8 months of NTP. Coordination This project must be well -coordinated from the start. Coordination of the design effort with County staff, SFWMD, FDEP, utilities, residential properties, and commercial businesses is essential for a successful project. Effective project coordination is the key to avoiding delays and completing the project on schedule. Our existing public involvement program will continue into the design phase at project kickoff, by updating our existing mailing lists, County website, and setting up early coordination meetings with key stakeholders. Our outreach will also include coordinating a public meeting when design plans are 60% complete. By establishing lines of communication, updating project information regularly on the County website, and maintaining an open dialogue, our team will promote public understanding and acceptance of the project, allowing it to move forward on schedule. Project Schedule Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, Project Manager and Deputy Project Manager Colleen Ross PE, will schedule and coordinate project activities. Changes will inevitably occur during the course of a project that could affect the schedule. When this happens, Bill will work with the County's project manager to manage the change, with the least impact on project schedule and budget. Exhibit 4-1 identifies target milestones and critical path items for this project. Schedule monitoring will consist of bi-weekly reviews of the schedule with specific focus on Critical Path elements. A working schedule will be maintained that documents performance to date vs. target and predicts future events. Good schedule control means expediting completion of the project. We will conduct team meetings on a regular basis to discuss key project milestones or any arising challenges. We will meet with each subconsultant bi-weekly to review the as -planned schedule and for a "look - ahead" review to ensure that we stay on schedule. Previous vrojeci Client Collier County JcneaULe verTormance Example Project Schedule Performance Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study Completed On Schedule Collier County Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Blvd Impact Study Completed On Schedule Collier County Palm River Bridge Replacement Completed On Schedule Collier County Immokalee Rd/Collier Blvd Intersection Completed On Schedule Seminole Tribe Josie Billie Highway Design Completed On Schedule Collier County Randall Blvd Corridor Study Completed On Schedule FDOT Immokalee Rd/Randall Blvd PD&E Study Completed On Schedule Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 4-3 EXHIBIT 4-1 Project Schedule Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Collier County Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening RPS No. 22-8006 July 28, 2022 ID Task Name Start Finish Qtr 1, 2023 Qtr 2, 2023 Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Qtr 2, 2024 Qtr 3, 2024 Dec Jan Feb I Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Improvements (550 day schedule) Mon 2/6/23 Fri 8/9/24 2 Notice to Proceed Mon 2/6/23 Mon 2/6/23 ►♦ 2/6 3 Coordination with Adjacent Projects Mon 2/6/23 Fri 8/9/24 4 On -Site Design Team Field Review(s) Mon 2/6/23 Fri 2/10/23_`S"`' `- 5 Design Workshop No. 1 (Refinement of Conceptual Design Decisions) (1/2 day event) Mon 2/13/23 Fri 2/17/23 6 Design Survey - Phase I Mon 2/20/23 Fri 4/14/23 tiaF zT4 7 Geotechnical Exploration and Report- Phase I Mon 2/20/23 Fri 4/14/23 ' A • d} z 8 Drainage Basin Delineation & Pond Siting Report Refinement Mon 2/20/23 Fri 4/28/23 1 w -- - _ 4/14 --- snslN z «iz�9 Notice to �,g 10 Prepare Typiclty al Section &es / Coordinate Pavemennt DesigntPackalge House Project Fri Mon/14/23 Fri 4/17/23 Fri 6/9%/33 1 1 0 0 POND POND 11 Prepare Bridge Development Report (BDR) & Bridge Hydraulics Report (BHR) Mon 4/17/23 Fri 6/9/23 SITE SITE 12 Phase I: 30% Submittal Mon 3/6/23 Fri 7/28/23 / ' 1 z 1 z z 13 Prepare 30%Plans Mon 3/6/23 Fri 6/23/23 ► 1 POND POND SITE 3-114 Design CA/QC Mon 6/26/23 Fri 7/7/23 SITE 2 3 � i 15 Identify ROW needs for Roadway, Drainage &Utility Infrastructure Mon 5/1/23 Fri 6/9/23 Permitting: "CRITICAL PATH" Early submittal of permits will depend on the final drainage 16 Phase 130% Submittal Fri 7/7/23 Fri 7/7/23 ; 7/7 basin delineation and pond siting as well as, environmental field reviews and impact 17 County Review (3 weeks) Mon 7/10/23 Fri 7/28/23 Exiatingt00'ROW Easement concurrence with permitting agencies. Schedule allows 12 months for permit acquisition. 18 Right -of -Way Acquisition Phase Mon 6/12/23 Fri 8/9/24 19 Prepare Sketch & Descriptions (Including County Review) Mon 6/12/23 Fri 8/4/23 - 20 ROW Acquisitions Process (12 months) Mon 8/7/23 Fri 8/9/24 g 21 Permitting Phase Mon 6/12/23 Fri 8/9/24 22 Prepare & Submit Permit Applications (with 60% "Permit" Plans) Mon 6/12/23 Fri 8/4/23 Existing 50'ROW Existing 50' ROWS R,o., 1s5 ROW 23 SFWMD ERP Permit Process (Estimated 6 - 9 months) Mon 8/7/23 Fri 5/10/24 24 FDEP 404 Permit Process (Estimated 9 - 12 months) Mon 8/7/23 Fri 8/9/24 25 Phase II: 60% Submittal Mon 7/31/23 Fri 12/1/23 NOTE: Project Critical Path shown in RED 26 Prepare 60% Plans (Roadway, Drainage, Bridge(s), etc...) Mon 7/31/23 Fri 10/27/23 $, 27 Design QA/QC - Constructability Review Mon 10/30/23 Fri 11/10/23 28 Phase 11 60%Submittal /Schedule Public Meeting & Utility Pre -Design Conference Fri 11/10/23 Fri 11/10/23 b. ♦�11/10 P,ogoa.E'80' ROW Pro ... ed 85' ROW _ 29 County Review (3 weeks) Mon 11/13/23 Fri 12/1/23 30 Phase III: 90%Submittal Mon 12/4/23 Fri 3/22/24 31 Prepare 90% Plans & Draft Specification - Perform Phase II Survey & Geotech Exploration (Ponds) Mon 12/4/23 Fri 2/9/24 32 Design CA/QC - Constructability & Bidability Review Mon 2/12/24 Fri 2/23/24 �•� " _ j-' 1 33 Phase III 90%Submittal &County Review (3 weeks) Mon 2/26/24 Fri 3/15/24 T 34 Utility Coordination Meeting - Utility Companies Provide "Draft" Utility Work Schedules Mon 3/18/24 Fri 3/22/24 35 Phase IV: 100% Submittal Mon 3/18/24 Fri 6/14/24 1 1 ; Right -of -Way: "CRITICAL PATH" 36 Prepare 100% Plans & Design QA/QC Mon 3/18/24 Fri 5/24/24 1 Early identification of ROW needs for 1 1 roadway, drainage, & utilities will 37 Phase IV 100% Submittal & County Review (3 weeks) Mon 5/27/24 Fri 6/14/24"-'� • __— - - i- allow 12 months for Sketch & 38 Bid Plans Submittal Mon 6/17/24 Fri 8/9/24 Description and ROW Acquisitions �1 39 Incorporate County Review comments - Utility Companies Provide "Final" Utility Work Schedules Mon 6/17/24 Fri 8/9/24 (Approx. 216 Parcels, 141 TCE's for ®` ® , rim driveways, and 8 well house/ vault 4 8 9 0 Issue Bid Plans, Specification, Quantities & Cost Estimates Fri 8/9/24 Fri 8/9/24 easements.) ♦� / RIPS No. 22-8006 Task Summary Inactive Milestone Duration -only Start -only L External Milestone Manual Progress July 28, 2022 Split . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary Rollup Finish -only J Deadline Milestone ♦ Inactive Task Manual Task I I Manual Summary ii External Tasks Progress Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 4-4 Demonstrated success managing costs on past County projects Cost Control We will focus on two critical areas: on -time decision making and top-quality, committed project staffing. Specific strategies we will implement to control project design and construction costs include: • Conduct task -specific workshops with County staff to discuss and evaluate project elements. Early integration of County staff into the design process will allow us to evaluate deliverables during development as opposed to milestone submittals thereby minimizing surprises and reducing late changes. • Weekly internal team meetings to discuss tasks requiring additional manpower, items ready for quality review, and the most efficient approaches to upcoming work tasks. • Close and early coordination with project stakeholders to avoid negative project image by agencies or public. • Establishing construction cost estimates based on current FDOT Data and adjusting data based on local bidding environment, refining those estimates as design proceeds. • Quality control, spearheaded by QA/QC team members to provide input throughout the project. Past Performance on Similar Projects Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study Budget $375,000 Completed On Budget Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Blvd Impact Study $96,514 Completed Under Budget Palm River Bridge $560,680 Completed Under Budget Immokalee Rd/Collier Blvd Intersection $625,000 Completed On Budget Josie Billie Highway Design $300,000 Completed On Budget Randall Blvd Corridor Study $662,496 Completed On Budget Immokalee Rd/Randall Blvd PD&E Study 1,000,000 Completed On Budget Minimization of Change Orders We work closely with County staff during scope and fee development to ensure all required services are considered. This minimizes the need for change orders during project execution which can be cumbersome and delay project schedules. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) At Jacobs, quality is more than a service we provide. Quality is a critical piece of successful project delivery. Our Quality Control Process is guided by the principle that all team members are responsible for quality. As part of our Quality Control Process, we assign senior reviewers who are independent of the project and have the experience to provide concentrated, rigorous reviews throughout the project. Our senior reviewers are subject matter experts in roadway, structures, and drainage, and were selected due to their successful completion of similar design projects. Formal quality control reviews are performed prior to draft and final deliverables. These reviews concentrate on issues of consistency, completeness, clarity, coordination, constructibility (when applicable), and cost effectiveness. Quality assurance reviews are performed to assure the deliverables will, on completion, conform to the specified requirements and meet your expectations. Adjacent Project Coordination Currently, there are multiple projects adjacent to the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project that will require coordination due to their potential effect on geometrics, access, ROW, drainage, and permitting. Our team will coordinate closely and often with these projects to ensure the latest plan sets are incorporated into the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design plans, to minimize impacts to this project as well as the adjacent projects and avoid future throw away costs. Adjacent Projects Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Project Construction (2022-2025) Wilson Boulevard Extension Planning Phase 2022 (Corridor Study) Tamiami Well Field Improvements RPS 22-8011: Design (2023- 2024) Estates Shopping Development (CPUD) Site Development (Ord. 21-40) Randall Blvd/Immokalee Rd Intersection Improvements I Phase I Design (8/22 Start) ZONING: E, ESTATES -. LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN .� ZONING E ESTATES _ y LAND USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 16' WIDE TYPED' LANDSC=PE BUFF y PRESERVE' 1 PRESERVE �16 WIDE B LANDSCAPETYPE BUFFER 4—+ MINIMUM 6-FOOT • - RETAIL IDEPE'D' WIDE 20' WIDE TYPE'D' LANDTPBUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION BUFFER l 'TRACT A (SEE NOTE #2) I �I ?? TRACT C TRACT B GH RETAIL 28'WIDE TYPED — ISTFa .AR-`w.�.4'u • -�.n AN15.g9A9E•x:. A.,F w. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 o, m �o 0 IA ni �c EXISTING A COUNTY y' WELL 0= G y� PROPOSED GA CONVENIENCE OZO zOz ._cam Page 4-5 Project Understanding EXHIBIT 4-2 Wilson Boulevard — South t._ 1 t �'. Urvo uscsrvrar�senirrt[s zox �� af T_ gl rauty oscav[ r z r i PRESERVEF —� PRESERVE ..... j $1 PRESERVE J wEw rsEExo�4 � TRACT A TRACT C TRACT B i Transition back to 2-lanes south of GG Blvd The existing access to 7-Eleven gas station Proposed "Estates Shopping Center" (CPUD) The existing drainage swales along Wilson The existing well systems must remain provides safe and efficient residential and should be modified to meet current access on the northwest corner of Wilson Blvd and Blvd reach capacity and fail during a moder- operational during construction. commercial access. Example: Provides longer management criteria. A potential paved GG Blvd will require coordination for ROW, ate rainstorm. Improvements to the drainage Coordination with the Wellfield Project for U-turn lane for vehicles exiting Walgreens access road in the rear has been discussed access management, offsite drainage, and conveyance along Wilson Blvd and along side construction phasing, access management, south, wanting to travel northbound on with the County, and will be discussed with will require roadway improvements along GG streets - which outfall to the adjacent canals - and site/civil improvements such as drainage As part of the Wilson Blvd Wellfield Utility work order Jacobs delivered for Collier County, extensive analyses of the well houses were performed. Several 3D and 2D sketches were presented to the county showing effective solutions that maintain operability and address drainage concerns. Access across the Cypress Canal must be maintained during new bridge construction. The new bridge will be built in two phases to maintain access for existing vehicular, bike/ped, CAT, and CCPS bus traffic and most importantly EMS along the corridor. Bridge closure/detours will not be allowed. This homeowner's leach field will need to be relocated as a result of the widening of Wilson Blvd. Since Well 32 is adjacent to the property, the new leach field will need to meet setback standards from the county well and the homeowner's private well. This house's entire front yard and driveway are still flooded 2 days after a moderate rainstorm. The proposed closed drainage system (with dry/wet ponds) for Wilson Blvd will help allevi- ate flooding and will improve conveyance adja- cent to properties. The ponds will also help provide compensatory storage needed for flood plain impacts due to roadway widening. The VBRX project will be under construction from September 2022 - September 2025. Coordination with this project will be re- quired. Modifications to the VBRX/Wilson Blvd intersection transitions (north/south) may be required to facilitate future construc- tion and minimize future throw -away costs. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 4-6 Project Understanding EXHIBIT 4-3 Wilson Boulevard - North Bus stop improvements will be designed for The existing CAT Bus System has 2 routes There are existing drainage conveyance issues Improvements to drainage conveyance out both CAT and CCPS. Jacobs will coordinate (19 & 28) along Wilson Blvd. Coordination along the side streets that drain to the Cork- falls into the Corkscrew Canal (east of Wilson with PTNE & CCPS staff to identify specific with PTNE staff during the Corridor Study screw Canal. This photo shows the flooding that Blvd) will require a SFWMD ROW permit. site improvement/facilities for each bus stop. resulted in the existing CAT stops at 14th AVE remains at a homeowner's driveway after a Improvements are recommended at all side Bus stop pads and bike racks will be being relocated to the VBRX intersection. moderate rainstorm. Side street drainage ditch streets to ensure proper stormwater pr Well Vault 37 is the northernmost well of the system along Wilson Blvd. Relocation of the 24-inch RWM line will begin here. The "pig launcher" is located at this well. ivicied at side streets for scnOOL chitaren. maintenance/improvements are needed. coLLection and conv%, ance to the canaLS. -�" 3 C0 nect�tuo new wnn ` 3 3 3 3 3 z ,, a z c z z z z oC z µ. 3WLUJ a a CIO� a h��u3:1 . aaUJ a d 00 l ;'IAI O N d W r Well House 34 r r N ry N O N i W II Vault 37 o s .. - - - - - - . � r Y � � • � � ` "4- 1f%a.'�"ia}. t s: __ t f OAP IL '�4 � � ., � '_ � � O � - m c UJ W W W w W' W W W "= W z z C F.- . r z z r� z z V J z a a m a` ` a a a a zaLLI a Maintaining vehicle access is essential during construction. MOT during construction must also consider the heavy truck traffic as well as emergency vehicle access. This requires a phased bridge construction over the Cypress Canal. The intersection geometry for Wilson Blvd at the Immokalee Rd Intersection was developed by Jacobs and County staff during corridor workshop meetings. The No. 2 northbound through lane transitions to a dual right -turn lane configuration to improve intersection operations. The proposed Wilson Blvd/Immokalee Rd in- The existing box culvert which conveys the tersection improvements will replace the ex- Cocohatchee Canal under Wilson Blvd will isting span wire signalization with 4 mast require extensions/replacement (TBD) to arms. The proposed Wilson Blvd/Golden accomodate the Wilson Blvd improvements Gate Blvd intersection will also require north of Immokalee Rd. signal and intersection capacity modification to improve operations. Coordination during design with the future Randall Blvd flyover concept will be required to ensure any improvements to Wilson Blvd and the box culvert north of Immokalee Rd considers the future impacts of the flyover footprint. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 4-7 Jacobs Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. This is a significant benefit of our team that will become even more valuable once the project proceeds from design to construction! Local Team Members Within Minutes of County Offices and the Project Site Meeting the unique requirements of this critical project means providing the County with skilled, highly responsive personnel who are based locally and bring superior technical capabilities and project management experience. Our Naples office, located less than 7 miles from the County offices and less than 25 minutes to the project site, is the principal and coordinating office for this contract. When needed we will draw on the technical expertise of staff from our other Florida offices, who bring recent and relevant experience providing services on Collier County transportation planning, design, and construction; Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization; and FOOT District 1 projects. Two of our subconsultant team members, Johnson Engineering and Capital Consulting Services, are also in Collier County, a short drive from our Naples office. Ardaman & Associates' main office is located in Lee County. Environmental Science Associates will provide services from their Tampa offices, and AHC team members will provide services from their office in Davie, Florida. See Exhibit 5-1 below. EXHIBIT 5-1 Proximity of Our Team Approach to Management and Execution of Work Project Manager, Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, will lead day-to-day management and coordination. Bill has the authority and resources to deliver all services that may be required throughout preparation of the design plans and construction documents and all related tasks required for this project. Bill has over 34 years of experience on a wide variety of transportation and transit projects, including planning, traffic, roadway, drainage, utility, environmental, minor local roadways, major urban arterials, state routes, and interstate highways. Bill has expertise in project management, roadway and transit studies and design, bicycle and pedestrian plans (including designing over 100 miles of sidewalks, pathways, and bicycle lanes), design -build criteria packages, underground utility design and relocations, Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies, and community outreach. He has managed more than 40 public involvement meetings and over 100 project stakeholder meetings. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 5-1 Project Stakeholders Communication Process Coordination between our team members, County staff, the public, and affected business owners must be consistent and continuous to successfully bring the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design project to reality. Bill's recent Collier County experience and specific experience on Wilson Boulevard makes him the best resource to lead and coordinate the various tasks required to complete this project on schedule and within budget. He will meet face-to-face with our subconsultant partners regularly, making sure we take a fully integrated team approach to this project. Our sophisticated computer network allows us to transfer documents and share project files and information between our Naples office and other Jacobs offices quickly and cost-effectively. Through Microsoft Teams or Zoom, we can easily host teleconferences and review meetings with County staff and remote team staff. Bill applies proven methods to successfully manage communication, people, and resources. Efficient communication between our team and the County is essential to establishing project goals and performance standards early in the project. We'll communicate continuously with your staff in written format (i.e., email, memos, and letters) as official direction to avoid misinterpretations. Proactive communication with the County, traveling public, and affected business owners will also help identify issues and concerns that need to be resolved early. Project Kickoff, Planning, and Operations Upon Notice to proceed, we will hold a project kickoff meeting withal[ team members and County staff outlining the path forward. Bill Gramer is responsible for day-to-day coordination, holding regular staff meetings and issuing frequent action item reports to document required actions. As Deputy Project Manager, Colleen Ross, PE will work with task managers to ensure project elements are well coordinated and receive a proper QA/QC prior to delivering milestones to the County. We will submit technical memoranda and monthly progress reports to County staff for review as the project progresses. Using technical memoranda and monthly progress reports has proven effective in achieving an orderly flow of work on past projects. This approach provides concise, detailed data and the ability to track action items and the record of decisions made. Project -Specific Work Plan We understand the importance of developing a detailed, task -specific work plan for this project that provides the appropriate level of management, reporting, and communication. Bill will meet with County staff once work is authorized to proceed. At this meeting, we'll establish clear lines of communication and review and finalize the project work plan. Planning is crucial to project success. A quality work plan defines all roles and responsibilities and describes how team knowledge and skills will be used to meet the project requirements. Development of the work plan is essential because it helps the team work together efficiently. Effective instruction in the work plan eliminates cost overruns, schedule slippages, and ineffective personnel assignments while promoting quality results. • OJacksonville vTallahassee O • Pensacola Gainesville Q Daytona Beach Orlando O ;zs Cape Canaveral Cocoa OMelbourne Tampa O JACOBS' OFFICES IN FLORIDA 0 Palm Beach Gardens 0 West Palm Beach Bonita Springs • Fort Lauderdale Naples • Miami Bill Gramer has assisted Collier County since 2002 on more than 15 projects within the project area (see Exhibit 3-1 in Section 3). In addition, many of the staff and subconsultants chosen for this project have contributed to the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study. This unparalleled experience will prove invaluable for this complex project, expediting project delivery and avoiding rework resulting from pursuing previously vetted and dismissed alternatives. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 5-2 EVALUATION CRITERIA NO.6 Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 31 Wilson e d • Available Resources and Current and Projected Workload Our team members have served Collier County on dozens of major projects in the last 30 years, and we're ready to partner with you again on this project. We fully understand the scope of services requirements and have the resources to begin work immediately. Our team thoroughly understands the processes required to accurately complete the tasks outlined in Section 4 (Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements), and we commit to making the resources available to deliver the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design project on time and within budget. Commitment of Key Team Members Our team members were selected for their proven experience delivering similar projects for Collier County and for other Southwest Florida clients, reputation for providing top-quality service, and ability to commit to this project for its duration. Collier County has been a priority client for Jacobs for the last 20+ years, as many of our staff Our current workload is such that this project aligns perfectly with our team's availability. The core team from our Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Project, which finished design in March 2022, is ready to transition to this project. In addition, several of our major projects currently under design will be reaching their final plan delivery milestones during Q1 of 2023—right when the Wilson Boulevard project will begin design. Jacobs' unique staffing structure will allow our management team to allocate staff to support the early project requirements, such as roadway design refinement and drainage modeling, while other hey technical staff will be made available for later project stages. Our Jacobs team has a proven recipe that has repeatedly delivered successful projects for Collier County. members are County residents. Your success is our success, and we are fully committed to making the place where we live and work the best it can be. As members of the Naples community, our team has a vested interest in quickly and efficiently completing projects that help our County meet its transportation infrastructure goals. Availability of Key Team Members We analyzed our existing projects and projected work, as well as that of our subconsultant partners, and can assure the County that we have the depth of staff needed to begin work immediately. Our team is composed of qualified planners, engineers, scientists, and construction phase personnel, and we're supported by an extensive pool of firm -wide resources who are available to provide services to the County. Exhibit 6-1 and Exhibit 6-2 on the following pages show key team members' availability to support this project. Our team is fully committed to providing the County quality deliverables for the duration of this contract. Project Manager, Bill Gramer, working in collaboration with our Naples -based team members, will ensure that appropriate staff is available to meet any project needs the County may request at any time under this contract. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 6-1 Our team has been carefully crafted to make sure there are overlaps in all disciplines, which means no gaps in experience, knowledge, or availability. As shown in Exhibit 6-1, the Jacobs team has excess availability for the duration of this project. The staff, project roles, current commitments, availability, and requirements for this project are detailed below. EXHIBIT 6-1 Average Staff Availability for Key Personnel (February 2023 to August 2024) TEAM MEMBER ROLE COMMITT Bill Beddow, PE Principal -in -Charge 50% 50% r Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Project Manager 40% 60% �r Colleen Ross, PE Deputy Project Manager 40% 60% w * Ken Wooten, PE QA/QC — Roadway 40% 60% a Velvet Bridges, PE, MSCE QA/QC — Structures 40% 60% * Danh Lee, PE QA/QC — Drainage/Permitting 50% 50% Eric Bridges, PE Roadway Design Lead 30% 70% a * Randy Mock, PE Structural Design Lead 60% 40% Y z Angela Shepard, PE Drainage Lead 50% 50% i�r Rick Gorsira Permitting/Environmental Lead 30% 70% * Mike Dickey, PE ■ Utilities Lead 50% 50% ,�r Curt Basnett, PE Geotechnical & Laboratory Testing 50% 50% r Ivan Sokolic, PE ♦ Geotechnical & Laboratory Testing 50% 50% * Cory Schulte, El ♦ Geotechnical & Laboratory Testing 50% 50% Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Highway & Roadway 40% 60% * Kevin Heldorfer Highway & Roadway 40% 60% * Nick De Ciccio, PE Highway & Roadway 50% 50% U< Lev Zilberman, PE Structures & Bridges 40% 60% a Chris Braden, PE Structures & Bridges 50% 50% *Darren Dyer, PE Drainage/Permitting 50% 50% Tatiana Alvarez, PE Drainage/Permitting 50% 50% Felicia Kirby, El Drainage/Permitting 40% 60% IS * Kristen Bridges Drainage/Permitting 50% 50% Kim Arnold, PG ■ Drainage/Permitting (Dewatering Permits) 50% 50% *Felicia Kirby, El Environmental 40% 60% Jennifer Korn, PhD, CWB ■ Environmental 30% 70% Laura Herrero, CSE ■ Environmental 60% 40% LU Y * Worked on the Wilson Blvd Corridor Study ■ Johnson CCS ❑ ESA Ardaman • AHC Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 6-2 EXHIBIT 6-1 Average Staff Availability for Key Personnel (February 2023 to August 2024), cont. TEAM MEMBER as, AE ■ ROLE Environmental COMMITTEJD�LE 50% 50% ldorfer Utility Design/Construction 40% 60% n, PE ■ Utility Design/Construction 50% 50% PE ■ FAdamAhmad, Utility Design/Construction 50% 50% r, PSM ■ SUE 50% 50% mer, PE, AICP MOT 40% 60% mad, PE, AICP, CGC ♦ MOT 50% 50% * Kevin Heldorfer MOT 40% 60% Cepeda Signing, Marking & Channelization 50% 50% #Milros * Tom Ross, PE ITS 60% 40% Ernest Sackey, PE, CVP ITS 60% 40% Aaron Johnson PE ITS 60% 40% * Guy Adams, PSM ■ ROW Mapping 30% 70% a Uj Ray Dechert ■ ROW Mapping 30% 70% J 'i�r Kevin Heldorfer ROW Mapping 40% 60% i�r Curt Basnett, PE Foundation Studies 50% 50% LU * Ivan Sokolic, PE ♦ Foundation Studies 50% 50% �r Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Developer/Adjacent Project Coordination 40% 60% * Tom Ross, PE Developer/Adjacent Project Coordination 60% 40% Steve Godin Graphics 30% 70% David Dishman Graphics 50% 50% 'i�r Nathan Lunsford, El Graphics 50% 50% Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC ♦ Graphics 50% 50% * Diana Francois, PE Well House Vault Design Modification Coordination 50% 50% * Tao Fu, PE Well House Vault Design Modification Coordination 50% 50% Tjikueni, PE Lighting & Signalization 60% 40% Irman epeda Lighting & Signalization 50% 50% arger o Noise Study Noise Study 50% 50% o 50% 50% } Y Worked on the Wilson Blvd Corridor Study ■Johnson CCS ❑ESA Ardaman • AHC Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 6-3 EXHIBIT 6-1 Average Staff Availability for Key Personnel (February 2023 to August 2024), cont. TEAM MEMBER AVG.PERCENT ROLE 0 COMMITTEJD�LE * Guy Adams, PSM ■ — Control Surveying 30% 70% * Ray Dechert ■ Control Surveying 30% 70% Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC ♦ Traffic Data & Modeling 50% 50% a Fritznel Saint Louis ♦ Traffic Data & Modeling 30% 70% P �z Robert Grubel Traffic Data & Modeling 60% 40% J u * Colleen Ross, PE Community Outreach 40% 60% r Tara Jones, PE Community Outreach 60% 40% UJI * Vanessa Davis Community Outreach 30% 70% Robert Carr • Archaeological/Historical 50% 50% Ryan Franklin, PhD • Archaeological/Historical 50% 50% John Beriault• Archaeological/Historical 50% 50% LU Y * Worked on the Wilson Blvd Corridor Study ■ Johnson CCS ❑ ESA Ardaman • AHC As you can see from Exhibit 6-2, the current and projected commitments of our project management staff, task leads, and technical staff are such that this project is critical to our team's future workload. Our project management staff and task leads average more than 50 percent availability for all disciplines, bolstering our team's efficient and effective coordination and project delivery. EXHIBIT 6-2 Average Staff Availability for Key Personnel (February 2023 to August 2024) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40 30% 20% 10% 0% Bill Bill Colleen Ken Velvet Danh Lee, Eric Randy Angela Rick Mike Beddow, Gramer, Ross, PE Wooten, Bridges, PE Bridges, Mock, PE Shepard, Gorsira Dickey, PE PE, AICP PE PE, MSCE PE PE PE ■Committed ■Available Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 6-4 EXHIBIT 6-3 Resource Loaded Project Schedule ■ Project Management ■ Lighting ■ Public Involvement 16 14 12 10 ru 4 2 RESOURCE LOADED PROJECT SCHEDULE ■ Roadway ■ Drainage Utilities ■ Environmental Surveys ■ Structures ■ Permitting ■ Traffic Design ■ Signing and Marking ® Geotechnical ■ Survey SUE ■ Archaeological 0 Feb-23 Mar-23 Apr-23 May-23 Jun-23 0 Jul-23 ■ Signals ■ Maintenance of Traffic ■ Noise Aug-23 Sep-23 Oct-23 Nov-23 Dec-23 Jan-24 Feb-24 Mar-24 Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24 MONTH - YEAR Jul-24 Aug-24 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page 6-5 Jacobs Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. colter County Adminstative Services Depadinent ProouremeM Services Dltision Vendor Check List IMPORTANT: Please review carefully and submit with your Proposal/Bid. AB applicable documents shall be submitted electronically through BidSync. Vendor should checkoff each of the following items: ® General Bid Instructions has been acknowledged and accepted. ® Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions have been acknowledged and accepted. ® Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement ® Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification ® Proof of status from Division of Corporations - Florida Department of State (If work performed in the State) - http://dos.myflorida.com/sunbiz/ should be attached with your submittal. ® Vendor MUST be emolled in the E-Verify - https://www.e-verify.gov/ at the time of submission of the proposaWid. ® Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification MUST be signed and attached with your submittal or you MAY be DEEMED NON -RESPONSIVE ® E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding or Company Profile page should be attached with your submittal. ® Form 4: Certification for Claiming Status as a Local Business, if applicable, has been executed and returned. Collier or Lee County Business Tax Receipt should be attached with your submittal to be considered. ® Form 5: Reference Questionnaires form must be utilized for each requested reference and included with your submittal, id applicable to the solicitation. ❑ Form 6: Grant Provisions and Assurances package in its entirety, it applicable, are executed and should be included with your submittal. All forms must be executed, or you MAY be DEEMED NON -RESPONSIVE. Not applicable ® Vendor W-9 Form. ® Vendor acknowledges Insurance Requirements and is prepared to produce the required insurance certificate(s) within five (5) days of the County's issuance of a Notice of Recommend Award. ® The Bid Schedule has been completed and attached with your submittal, applicable to bids. ® Copies of all requested licenses and/or certifications to complete the requirements of the project. ® All addenda have been signed and attached, or you MAY be DEEMED NON -RESPONSIVE. ® County's IT Technical Architecture Requirements has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. ® Any and all supplemental requirements and terms has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. cow a Adminatrahve Services DeparsneM Procurement Services DO, — Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Vendor declares that this response is made without connection or arrangement with any other person and this proposal is in every respect fair and made in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The Vendor hereby declares the instructions, purchase order terms and conditions, requirements, and specifications/scope of work of this solicitation have been fully examined and accepted. The Vendor agrees, if this solicitation submittal is accepted by Collier County, to accept a Purchase Order as a form of a formal contract or to execute a Collier County formal contract for purposes of establishing a contractual relationship between the Vendor and Collier County, for the performance of all requirements to which this solicitation pertains. The Vendor states that the submitted is based upon the documents listed by the above referenced solicitation. The Vendor agrees to comply with the requirements in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications denoted herein and according to the pricing submitted as a part of the Vendor's bids. Further, the Vendor agrees that if awarded a contract for these goods and/or services, the Vendor will not be eligible to compete, submit a proposal, be awarded, or perform as a sub -vendor for any future associated work that is a result of this awarded contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this 22 day of July , 2022 in the County of Collier , in the State of Florida Finn's Legal Name: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Address: 9010 Strada Stell Court, Unit 108 City, State, Zip Code: Naples, FL 34109 Florida Certificate of P13217 Authority Document Number Federal Tax 98-4081636 Identification Number *CCR # or CAGE Code 3T810 *Only if Grant Funded Telephone: 239.596.1715 Email: Ellpenn.PaattterrrsoonnAiaiaaccobs.com Signature by: C. ArW, k.9. / duaceor-' Ellen B. Patterson (Typed and written) Title: Vice President Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-1 Additional Contact Information Send payments to: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (required if different from Company time used as payee above) Contact name: Bill Grainer, PE, AICP Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Telephone: Project Manager 800 Market Street, Lockbox 18713F St. Louis, MO 63150-8713 239.860.4922 Email: Bill.Gramer(a),iacobs.com Office servicing Collier Naples, FL County to place orders (required if different from above) Contact name: Bill Grainer, PE, AICP Title: Project Manager Address: 9010 Stmda Steil Court, Unit 108 City, State, ZIP Naples, FL 34109 Telephone: 239.860.4922 Email: Bill.Gramerna.iacobs.com Coder County AdmirdsWm Serrims Departrnent Prowremem Senn— Division Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification Affidavit The Vendor certifies that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, the past and current work on any Collier County project affiliated with this solicitation does not pose an organizational conflict as described by one of the three categories below: Biased ground rules — The firm has not set the "ground rules" for affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above (e.g., writing a procurement's statement of work, specifications, or performing systems engineering and technical direction for the procurement) which appears to skew the competition in favor of my firm. Impaired objectivity — The firm has not performed work on an affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above to evaluate proposals / past performance of itself or a competitor, which calls into question the contractor's ability to render impartial advice to the government. Unequal access to information —The firm has not had access to nonpublic information as part of its performance of a Collier County project identified above which may have provided the contractor (or an affiliate) with an unfair competitive advantage in current or future solicitations and contracts. In addition to this signed affidavit, the contractor / vendor must provide the following: 1. All documents produced as a result of the work completed in the past or currently being worked on for the above- mentioned project; and, 2. Indicate if the information produced was obtained as a matter of public (in the "sunshine") or through non-public (not in the "sunshine") conversation (s), meeting(s), document(s) and/or other means. Failure to disclose all material or having an organizational conflict in one or more of the three categories above be identified, may result in the disqualification for future solicitations affiliated with the above referenced project(s). By the signature below, the firm (employees, officers and/or agents) certifies, and hereby discloses, that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, all relevant facts concerning past, present, or currently planned interest or activity (financial, contractual, organizational, or otherwise) which relates to the project identified above has been fully disclosed and does not pose an organizational conflict. ��N STACEY R081N LESSER Notary Public State of Flonda s Commkslan N GG 301592 F,o My Comm. Expires Apr 1, 2013 Bonded through National Notary Assn. State of Florida County of Broward Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ,,)Company Name L .c-Cih. �- �GEGCW Signature Ellen B. Patterson, Vice President Print Name and Title The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ® physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this 22 day of July _ (month), 2022 (year), by Stacey Robin Lesser �twW J^(�n�,a'�'m'�e "1o'f Berson acknowledging). �t R (Signature Notary Public) Stacey Robin Lesser (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Personally Known OR Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-2 co��y � se� Procurement Services Division Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification This Affidavit is required and should be signed, by an authorized principal of the firm and submitted with formal solicitation submittals. Further, Vendors are required to be enrolled in the E-Verify program (htms,//www.e-verify.gov/) at the time of the submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid. Acceptable evidence of your enrollment consists of a copy of the properly completed E- Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company which will be produced at the time of the submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid or within five (5) day of the County's Notice of Recommend Award FAILURE TO EXECUTE THIS AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION AND SUBMIT WITH VENDOR'S PROPOSAL/BED MAY DEEM THE VENDOR'S AS NON -RESPONSIVE. Collier County will not intentionally award County contracts to any Vendor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provision contained in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324 a(e) Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). Collier County may consider the employment by any Vendor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A (e) of the INA. Such Violation by the recipient of the Employment Provisions contained in Section 274A (e) of the INA shall be grounds for unilateral termination of the contract by Collier County. Vendor attests that they are fully compliant with all applicable immigration laws (specifically to the 1986 Immigration Act and subsequent Amendment(s), that it is aware of and in compliance with the requirements set forth in Florida Statutes §448.095, and agrees to comply with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding with E-Verify and to provide proof of enrollment in The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify), operated by the Department of Homeland Security in partnership with the Social Security Administration at the time of submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid. STAU ROBINLESSER Notary Fabli, -State of Florida ion # GG 303592 My Comm. CommissExpires ADr 11 2023 aonde0 through National NotaryAsm. State of Florida County of Broward Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Company Name Signature Ellen B. Patterson, Vice President Print Name and Title The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 0 physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this 22 day of July (month), 2022 (year), by Stacey Robin Lesser time of person acknowledging). (Signature of Notary Public) Stacey Robin Lesser (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Personally I{nown OR Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced Verity Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number. 885319 THE E-VERIFY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR EMPLOYERS USING A WEB SERVICES E-VERIFY EMPLOYER AGENT ARTICLE 1 PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY The parties to this agreement are the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (Employer), and the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent. The purpose of this agreement is to set forth terms and conditions which the Employer and the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent will follow while participating in E-Verify. E-Verify is a program that electronically confirms an employee's eligibility to work in the United States after completion of Form 1-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (Form 1-9). This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) explains certain features of the E-Verify program and describes specific responsibilities of the Employer, the E-Verify Employer Agent, the Social Security Administration (SSA), and DHS. References in this MOU to the Employer include the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when acting on behalf of the Employer. For purposes of this MOU, the E-Verify browser refers to the website that provides direct access to the E-Verify system: hfos://e-verify uscis -gov/emo/. You may access E-Verify directly free of charge via the E-Verify, browser. Authority for the E-Verify program is found in Title IV, Subtitle A, of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, as amended (6 U.S.C. § 1324a note). The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 22.18, "Employment Eligibility Verification" and Executive Order 12989, as amended, provide authority for Federal contractors and subcontractors (Federal contractor) to use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of certain employees working on Federal contracts. ARTICLE II RESPONSIBILITIES A. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER For purposes of this MOU, references to the Employer include the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when acting on behalf of the Employer. 1. By enrolling in E-Verify and signing the applicable MOU, the Employer asserts that it is a legitimate company which intends to use E-Verify for legitimate purposes only and in accordance with the laws, regulations and DHS policies and procedures relating to the use of E-Verify. Page 1 of 25 E-Verity, MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Venty Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-3 E-Verify Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 2. The Employer agrees to display the following notices supplied by DHS (though the Web Services E Verify Employer Agent) in a prominent place that is clearly visible to prospective employees and all employees who are to be verified through the system: a. Notice of E-Verify Participation b. Notice of Right to Work 3. The Employer agrees to provide to the SSA and DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Employer representatives to be contacted about E-Verify. The Employer also agrees to keep such information current by providing updated information to SSA and DHS whenever the representatives' contact information changes. 4. The Employer agrees to become familiar with and comply with the most recent version of the E-Verify User Manual. The Employer will obtain the E-Verify User Manual from the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, and will be notified by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when a new version of the E-Verify User Manual becomes available. 5. The Employer agrees to comply with current Form 1-9 procedures, with two exceptions a. If an employee presents a "List B" identity document, the Employer agrees to only accept "List B" documents that contain a photo. (List B documents identified in 8 C.F.R. 274a.2(b)(1)(8)) can be presented during the Form 1-9 process to establish identity.) If an employee objects to the photo requirement for religious reasons, the Employer should contact E-Verify at 888.464-4218. b. If an employee presents a DHS Form 1-551 (Permanent Resident Card), Form 1-766 (Employment Authorization Document), or U.S. Passport or Passport Card to complete Form 1-9, the Employer agrees to make a photocopy of the document and to retain the photocopy with the employee's Form 1-9. The Employer will use the photocopy to verify the photo and to assist DHS with its review of photo mismatches that employees contest. DHS may in the future designate other documents that activate the photo screening tool. Note: Subject only to the exceptions noted previously in this paragraph, employees still retain the right to present any List A, or List B and List C, document(s) to complete the Form 1-9. 6. The Employer agrees to record the case verification number on the employee's Form 1-9 or to print the screen containing the case verification number and attach it to the employee's Form 1-9. 7. The Employer agrees that, although it participates in E-Verify, the Employer has a responsibility to complete, retain, and make available for inspection Forms 1-9 that relate to its employees, or from other requirements of applicable regulations or laws, including the obligation to comply with the antidiscrimination requirements of section 274E of the INA with respect to Form 1-9 procedures. a. The following modified requirements are the only exceptions to an Employer's obligation to not employ unauthorized workers and comply with the anti -discrimination provision of the INA: (1) List B identity documents must have photos, as described in paragraph 6 above; (2) When an Employer confirms the identity and employment eligibility of newly hired employee using E-Verify procedures, the Employer establishes a rebuttable presumption that it has not violated section 274A(a)(1)(A) of Page 2 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01113 E-Verify { Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) with respect to the hiring of that employee; (3) If the Employer receives a final nonconfirmation for an employee, but continues to employ that person, the Employer must notify DHS and the Employer is subject to a civil money penalty between $550 and $1,100 for each failure to notify DHS of continued employment following a final nonconfirmation; (4) If the Employer continues to employ an employee after receiving a final nonconfirmation, then the Employer is subject to a rebuttable presumption that it has knowingly employed an unauthorized alien in violation of section 274A(a)(1)(A); and (5) no E-Verify participant is civilly or criminally liable under any law for any action taken in good faith based on information provided through the E-Verify. b. DHS reserves the right to conduct Form 1-9 compliance inspections, as well as any other enforcement or compliance activity authorized by law, including site visits, to ensure proper use of E-Verify. 8. The Employer is strictly prohibited from creating an E-Verify case before the employee has been hired, meaning that a firm offer of employment was extended and accepted and Form 1-9 was completed. The Employer agrees to create an E-Verify case for new employees within three Employer business days after each employee has been hired (after both Sections 1 and 2 of Form 1-9 have been completed), and to complete as many steps of the E-Verify process as are necessary according to the E-Verify User Manual. If E-Verify is temporarily unavailable, the three-day time period will be extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Employer's attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries during the period of unavailability. 9. The Employer agrees not to use E-Verify for pre -employment screening of job applicants, in support of any unlawful employment practice, or for any other use that this MOU or the E-Verify User Manual does not authorize. 10. The Employer must use E-Verify (through its Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent) for all new employees. The Employer will not verify selectively and will not verify employees hired before the effective date of this MOU. Employers who are Federal contractors may qualify for exceptions to this requirement as described in Article II.B of this MOU. 11. The Employer agrees to follow appropriate procedures (see Article III below) regarding tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee's E-Verify case. The Employer agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. Further, when employees contest a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer must take additional steps (see Article 111.13 below) to contact DHS with information necessary to resolve the challenge. 12. The Employer agrees not to take any adverse action against an employee based upon the employee's perceived employment eligibility status while SSA or DHS is processing the verification request unless the Employer obtains knowledge (as defined in 8 C.F.R. § 274a.1(1)) that the employee is not work authorized. The Employer understands that an initial inability of the SSA or DHS automated Page 3 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01113 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-4 Verify Company to Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 verification system to verify work authorization, a tentative nonconfirmation, a case in continuance (indicating the need for additional time for the government to resolve a case), or the finding of a photo mismatch, does not establish, and should not be interpreted as, evidence that the employee is not work authorized. In any of such cases, the employee must be provided a full and fair opportunity to contest the finding, and if he or she does so, the employee may not be terminated or suffer any adverse employment consequences based upon the employee's perceived employment eligibility status (including denying, reducing, or extending work hours, delaying or preventing training, requiring an employee to work in poorer conditions, withholding pay, refusing to assign the employee to a Federal contract or other assignment, or otherwise assuming that he or she is unauthorized to work) until and unless secondary verification by SSA or DHS has been completed and a final nonconfirmation has been issued. If the employee does not choose to contest a tentative nonconfirmation or a photo mismatch or if a secondary verification is completed and a final nonconfirmation is issued, then the Employer can find the employee is not work authorized and terminate the employee's employment. Employers or employees with questions about a final nonconfirmation may call E-Verify at 1-888-464- 4218 (customer service) or 1-888-897-7781 (worker hotline). 13. The Employer agrees to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and section 274B of the INA as applicable by not discriminating unlawfully against any individual in hiring, firing, employment eligibility verification, or recruitment or referral practices because of his or her national origin or citizenship status, or by committing discriminatory documentary practices. The Employer understands that such illegal practices can include selective verification or use of E-Verify except as provided in part D below, or discharging or refusing to hire employees because they appear or sound "foreign" or have received tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer further understands that any violation of the immigration -related unfair employment practices provisions in section 274B of the INA could subject the Employer to civil penalties, back pay awards, and other sanctions, and violations of Title VI could subject the Employer to back pay awards, compensatory and punitive damages. Violations of either section 274B of the INA or Title VII may also lead to the termination of its participation in E-Verify. If the Employer has any questions relating to the anti -discrimination provision, it should contact OSC at 1-800-255-8155 or 1-800-237-2515 (TOO). 14. The Employer agrees that it will use the information it receives from E-Verify (through its Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent) only to confirm the employment eligibility of employees as authorized by this MOU. The Employer agrees that it will safeguard this information, and means of access to it (such as Personal Identification Numbers and passwords), to ensure that it is not used for any other purpose and as necessary to protect its confidentiality, including ensuring that it is not disseminated to any person other than employees of the Employer who are authorized to perform the Employers responsibilities under this MOU, except for such dissemination as may be authorized in advance by SSA or DHS for legitimate purposes. 15. The Employer agrees to notify DHS immediately in the event of a breach of personal information. Breaches are defined as loss of control or unauthorized access to E-Verify personal data. All suspected or confirmed breaches should be reported by calling 1-888-464-4218 or via email at E-VerifVCddhs.gOV. Please use "Privacy Incident — Password" in the subject line of your email when sending a breach report to E-Verify. 16. The Employer acknowledges that the information it receives from SSA through its Web Services Page 4 of 25 E-Vent' MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 rz -Verify Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: $85319 E-Verify Employer Agent is governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(1) and (3)) and the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)). Any person who obtains this information under false pretenses or uses it for any purpose other than as provided for in this MOU may be subject to criminal penalties. 17. The Employer agrees to cooperate with DHS and SSA in their compliance monitoring and evaluation of E-Verify, which includes permitting DHS, SSA, their contractors and other agents, upon reasonable notice, to review Forms 1-9 and other employment records and to interview it and its employees regarding the Employer's use of E-Verify, and to respond in a prompt and accurate manner to DHS requests for information relating to their participation in E-Verify. 18. The Employer shall not make any false or unauthorized claims or references about its participation in E-Verify on its website, in advertising materials, or other media. The Employer shall not describe its services as federally -approved, federally -certified, or federally -recognized, or use language with a similar intent on its website or other materials provided to the public. Entering into this MOU does not mean that E-Verify endorses or authorizes your E-Verify services and any claim to that effect is false. 19. The Employer shall not state in its website or other public documents that any language used therein has been provided or approved by DHS, USCIS or the Verification Division, without first obtaining the prior written consent of DHS. 20. The Employer agrees that E-Verify trademarks and logos may be used only under license by DHS/USCIS (see M-795 (Web)) and, other than pursuant to the specific terms of such license, may not be used in any manner that might imply that the Employer's services, products, websites, or publications are sponsored by, endorsed by, licensed by, or affiliated with DHS, USCIS, or E-Verify. 21. The Employer understands that if it uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Employer may be subject to appropriate legal action and termination of its participation in E-Verify according to this MOU. B. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE WEB SERVICES E-VERIFY EMPLOYER AGENT 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to complete its Web Services interface no later than six months after the date the Web Services User signs this MOU. E-Verify considers your interface to be complete once it has been built pursuant to the Interface Control Agreement (ICA), submitted to E-Verify for testing, and approved for system access. 2. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to perform sufficient maintenance on the Web Services interface in accordance with the requirements listed in the ICA- These requirements include, but are not limited to, updating the Web Services interface to ensure that any updates or enhancements are incorporated no later than six months after the issuance of an ICA. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents should be aware that this will require the investment of time and resources. Compliance with the requirements of the ICA must be carried out to the satisfaction of DHS and or its assignees. 3. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide to SSA and/or DHS the names, titles, addresses, e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers of the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent representative who will access information, as well as ensure cooperation, communication, and Page 5 of 25 E-Vent' MOU for Employers Using a Web services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-5 E-VeriFy Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 coordination with E-Verify. In addition, Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must provide to SSA and/or DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of its clients and their staff who will access information through E-Verify. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must ensure the contact information is updated with SSA and DHS whenever the points of contact change. 4. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to become familiar with and comply with the E-Verify User Manual and provide a copy of the most current version of the manual to the Employer so that the Employer can become familiar with and comply with E-Verify policy and procedures. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to obtain a revised E-Verify User Manual as it becomes available and to provide a copy of the revised version to the Employer no later than 30 days after the manual becomes available. 5. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any person accessing E-Verify on its behalf is trained on the most recent E-Verify policy and procedures. 6. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any of its representatives who will perform employment verification cases will complete the E-Verify Tutorial before that individual initiates any cases. a. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that all of its representatives will take the refresher tutorials initiated by E-Verify as a condition of continued use of E-Verify, including any tutorials for Federal contractors, if any of the Employers represented by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is a Federal contractor. b. Failure to complete a refresher tutorial will prevent the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and Employer from continued use of E-Verify. 7. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to grant E-Verify access only to current employees who need E-Verify access. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must promptly terminate an employee's E-Verify access if the employee is separated from the company or no longer needs access to E-Verify. 8. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to obtain the necessary equipment to use E- Verify as required by the E-Verify rules and regulations as modified from time to time. 9. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to, consistent with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, commit sufficient personnel and resources to meet the requirements of this MOU. 10. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide its clients with training on E-Verify processes, policies, and procedures. The E-Verify Employer Agent also agrees to provide its clients with ongoing E-Verify training as needed. E-Verify is not responsible for providing training to clients of E-Verify Employer Agents. 11. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide the Employer with the notices described in Article 11.3.2 below. 12. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to create E-Verify cases for the Employer it represents in accordance with the E-Verify Manual, the E-Verify Web -Based Tutorial and all other Page 6 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Venry Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 VeriFy Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company to Number: 885319 published E-Verify rules and procedures. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent will create E-Verify cases using information provided by the Employer and will immediately communicate the response back to the Employer. If E-Verify is temporarily unavailable, the three-day time period will be extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries on behalf of the Employer during the period of unavailability. If, however, the Web Services interface is unavailable due to no fault of E-Verify, then the three-day time period is not extended. In such a case, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must use the E-Verify browser during the outage. 13. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to ensure that all notices, referral letters and any other materials otherwise including instructions regarding tentative nonconfirmations, will be consistent with the most current E-Verify tentative nonconfirmation notices and referral letters, which are available on E-Verify's website. 14. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any system or interface it develops will follow the steps for creating E-Verify cases and processing tentative nonconfirmations, as laid out in the ICA, this MOU and the User Manual, including but not limited to allowing an employer to close an invalid case where appropriate, allowing an employer to refer a tentative nonconfirmation only when an employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation (no automatic referrals), and referring a tentative nonconfirmation to the appropriate agency at the time the employer prints the referral letter and provides the letter to the employee. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that any failure to make its system or interface consistent with proper E-Verify procedures can result in DHS terminating the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's agreement and access with or without notice. 15. When the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent receives notice from a client company that it has received a contract with the FAR clause, then the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must update the company's E-Verify profile within 30 days of the contract award date. 16. If data is transmitted between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and its client, then the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to protect personally identifiable information during transmission to and from the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent. 17. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to notify DHS immediately in the event of a breach of personal information. Breaches are defined as loss of control or unauthorized access to E-Verify personal data. All suspected or confirmed breaches should be reported by calling 1-888A64- 4218 or via email at E-Verifv apdhs.gov. Please use "Privacy Incident — Password" in the subject line of your email when sending a breach report to E-Verify. 18. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to fully cooperate with DHS and SSA in their compliance monitoring and evaluation of E-Verify, including permitting DHS, SSA, their contractors and other agents, upon reasonable notice, to review Forms 1-9, employment records, and all records pertaining to the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's use of E-Verify, and to interview it and its employees regarding the use of E-Verify, and to respond in a timely and accurate manner to DHS requests for information relating to their participation in E-Verify. a. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to cooperate with DHS if DHS requests Page 7 of 25 &'Venty, MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Venfy Employer Agent I Revision Dale O6/01113 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RIDS No. 22-8006 Page A-6 E-Verify * -'r, Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 information about the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's interface, including requests by DHS to view the actual interface operated by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent as well as related business documents. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate for DHS the functionality of its interface to E-Verify upon request. b. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate, if requested by DHS, that it has provided training to its clients that meets E-Verify standards. Training programs must provide a focused study of the topics covered in the E-Verify User Manual and pertinent Supplemental Guides. Furthermore, training programs and materials must be updated as E-Verify changes occur. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is encouraged to incorporate information from existing E-Verify materials, including the Enrollment Quick Reference Guide, the E-Verify Employer Agent Client Handbook (formerly known as the Designated Agent Client Handbook), and existing tutorials and manuals into their training program. E-Verify also encourages the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent to supervise first-time use of the E-Verify browser or Web Services interface by its staff and Employer clients as part of any training program. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to submit its training program materials to DHS for review upon request. Failure to provide adequate training could, in some instances, lead to penalties as described in Article V.F.1. of this MOU. 19. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not make any false or unauthorized claims or references about its participation in E-Verify on its website, in advertising materials, or other media. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not describe its services as federally -approved, federally -certified, or federally -recognized, or use language with a similar intent on its website or other materials provided to the public. Entering into this MOU does not mean that E-Verify endorses or authorizes your Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent services and any claim to that effect is false. 20. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not slate in its website or other public documents that any language used therein has been provided or approved by DHS, USCIS or the Verification Division, without first obtaining the prior written consent of DHS. 21. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that E-Verify trademarks and logos may be used only under license by DHS/USCIS (see M-795 (Web)) and, other than pursuant to the specific terms of such license, may not be used in any manner that might imply that the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's services, products, websites, or publications are sponsored by, endorsed by, licensed by, or affiliated with DHS, USCIS, or E-Verify. 22. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that if it uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may be subject to appropriate legal action and termination of its participation in E-Verify according to this MOU. C. RESPONSIBILITIES OF FEDERAL CONTRACTORS The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall ensure that the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and the Employers it represents carry out the following responsibilities if the Employer is a Federal contractor or becomes a federal contractor. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent should instruct the client to keep the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent informed about any changes or updates related to federal contracts. It is the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's Page 8 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Usrng a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 E-Verify0 111*0.�11 Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 responsibility to ensure that its clients are in compliance with all E-Verify policies and procedures 1. If the Employer is a Federal contractor with the FAR E-Verify clause subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR, it will become familiar with and comply with the most current version of the E-Verify User Manual for Federal Contractors as well as the E-Verify Supplemental Guide for Federal Contractors. 2. In addition to the responsibilities of every employer outlined in this MOU, the Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR it must verify the employment eligibility of any "employee assigned to the contract" (as defined in FAR 22.1801). Once an employee has been verified through E-Verify by the Employer, the Employer may not reverify the employee through E-Verify. a. An Employer that is not enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor at the time of a contract award must enroll as a Federal contractor in the E-Verify program within 30 calendar days of contract award and, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to verify employment eligibility of new hires using E-Verify. The Employer must verify those employees who are working in the United States, whether or not they are assigned to the contract. Once the Employer begins verifying new hires, such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the hire date. Once enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor, the Employer must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee's assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. b. Employers enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 days or more at the time of a contract award must use E-Verify to begin verification of employment eligibility for new hires of the Employer who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract, within three business days after the date of hire. If the Employer is enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 calendar days or less at the time of contract award, the Employer must, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to use E-Verify to initiate verification of new hires of the contractor who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract. Such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the date of hire. An Employer enrolled as a Federal contractor in E-Verify must begin verification of each employee assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after date of contract award or within 30 days after assignment to the contract, whichever is later. c. Federal contractors that are institutions of higher education (as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), state or local governments, governments of Federally recognized Indian tribes, or sureties performing under a takeover agreement entered into with a Federal agency under a performance bond may choose to only verify new and existing employees assigned to the Federal contract. Such Federal contractors may, however, elect to verify all new hires, and/or all existing employees hired after November 6, 1986. Employers in this category must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee's assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. d. Upon enrollment, Employers who are Federal contractors may elect to verify employment eligibility of all existing employees working in the United States who were hired after November 6, 1986, instead of verifying only those employees assigned to a covered Federal contract. After enrollment, Employers must elect to verify existing staff following DHS procedures and begin Page 9 of 25 E•Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web services E-Venfy Employer Agent I Revision Dale 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-7 VeriFy Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 685319 E-Verify verification of all existing employees within 180 days after the election. e. The Employer may use a previously completed Form 1-9 as the basis for creating an E-Verify case for an employee assigned to a contract as long as: i. That Form 1-9 is complete (including the SSN) and complies with Article II.A.6, ii. The employee's work authorization has not expired, and iii. The Employer has reviewed the information reflected in the Form 1-9 either in person or in communications with the employee to ensure that the employee's Section 1, Form 1-9 attestation has not changed (including, but not limited to, a lawful permanent resident alien having become a naturalized U.S. citizen). f. The Employer shall complete a new Form 1-9 consistent with Article II.A.6 or update the previous Form 1-9 to provide the necessary information if: i. The Employer cannot determine that Form 1-9 complies with Article II.A.6, ii. The employee's basis for work authorization as attested in Section 1 has expired or changed.or iii. The Form 1-9 contains no SSN or is otherwise incomplete. Note: If Section 1 of Form 1-9 is otherwise valid and up-to-date and the form otherwise complies with Article II.C.5, but reflects documentation (such as a U.S. passport or Form 1-551) that expired after completing Form 1-9, the Employer shall not require the production of additional documentation, or use the photo screening tool described in Article II.A.5, subject to any additional or superseding instructions that may be provided on this subject in the E-Verify User Manual. g. The Employer agrees not to require a second verification using E-Verify of any assigned employee who has previously been verified as a newly hired employee under this MOU or to authorize verification of any existing employee by any Employer that is not a Federal contractor based on this Article. 3. The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, its compliance with this MOU is a performance requirement under the terms of the Federal contract or subcontract, and the Employer consents to the release of information relating to compliance with its verification responsibilities under this MOU to contracting officers or other officials authorized to review the Employer's compliance with Federal contracting requirements. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF SSA 1. SSA agrees to allow DHS to compare data provided by the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) against SSA's database. SSA sends DHS confirmation that the data sent either matches or does not match the information in SSA's database. 2. SSA agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) through E-Verify procedures. SSA also agrees to limit access to such information, as is appropriate by law, to individuals responsible for the verification of Social Security numbers or responsible for evaluation of E-Verify or such other persons or entities who may be authorized by SSA as governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a), the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)), and SSA regulations (20 CFR Part 401). Page 10 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06101/13 r VeriFy a V.."51 Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 3. SSA agrees to provide case results from its database within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. E-Verify provides the information to the E-Verify Employer Agent. 4. SSA agrees to update SSA records as necessary if the employee who contests the SSA tentative nonconffrmation visits an SSA field office and provides the required evidence. If the employee visits an SSA field office within the eight Federal Government work days from the date of referral to SSA, SSA agrees to update SSA records, if appropriate, within the eight -day period unless SSA determines that more than eight days may be necessary. In such cases, SSA will provide additional instructions to the employee. If the employee does not visit SSA in the time allowed, E-Verify may provide a final nonconffrmation to the E-Verify Employer Agent. Note: If an Employer experiences technical problems, or has a policy question, the employer should contact E-Verify at 1-888-464-4218. E. RESPONSIBILITIES OF DHS 1. DHS agrees to provide the Employer with selected data from DHS databases to enable the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) to conduct, to the extent authorized by this MOU: a. Automated verification checks on alien employees by electronic means, and b. Photo verification checks (when available) on employees. 2. DHS agrees to assist the E-Verify Employer Agent with operational problems associated with its participation in E-Verify. DHS agrees to provide the E-Verify Employer Agent names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of DHS representatives to be contacted during the E-Verify process. 3. DHS agrees to provide to the E-Verify Employer Agent with access to E-Verify training materials as well as an E-Verify User Manual that contain instructions on E-Verify policies, procedures, and requirements for both SSA and DHS, including restrictions on the use of E-Verify. 4. DHS agrees to train E-Verify Employer Agents on all important changes made to E-Verify through the use of mandatory refresher tutorials and updates to the E-Verify User Manual. Even without changes to E-Verify, DHS reserves the right to require E-Verify Employer Agents to take mandatory refresher tutorials. 5. DHS agrees to provide to the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) a notice, which indicates the Employer's participation in E-Verify. DHS also agrees to provide to the Employer anti- discrimination notices issued by the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration -Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice. 6. DHS agrees to issue each of the E-Verify Employer Agent's E-Verify users a unique user identification number and password that permits them to log in to E-Verify. 7. DHS agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides (through the E-Verify Employer Agent), and to limit access to such information to individuals responsible for the verification process, for evaluation of E-Verify, or to such other persons or entities as may be authorized by applicable law. Information will be used only to verify the accuracy of Social Security numbers and employment eligibility, to enforce the INA and Federal criminal laws, and to administer Federal contracting Page 11 of 25 E-Venry MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RIDS No. 22-8006 Page A-8 E-Verify Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company to Number: 885319 requirements. 8. DHS agrees to provide a means of automated verification that provides (in conjunction with SSA verification procedures) confirmation or tentative nonconfirmation of employees' employment eligibility within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. 9 DHS agrees to provide a means of secondary verification (including updating DHS records) for employees who contest DHS tentative nonconfirmations and photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmations. This provides final confirmation or nonconfirmation of the employees' employment eligibility within 10 Federal Government work days of the date of referral to DHS, unless DHS determines that more than 10 days may be necessary. In such cases, DHS will provide additional verification instructions. ARTICLE III REFERRAL OF INDIVIDUALS TO SSA AND DHS A. REFERRAL TO SSA 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by SSA, the Employer must print the notice as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee's E-Verify case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee's response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. After a tentative nonconfirmation, the Employer will refer employees to SSA field offices only as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must record the case verification number, review the employee information submitted to E-Verify to identify any errors, and find out whether the employee contests the tentative nonconfirmation. The Employer will transmit the Social Security number, or any other corrected employee information that SSA requests, to SSA for verification again if this review indicates a need to do so. 4. The Employer will instruct the employee to visit an SSA office within eight Federal Government work days. SSA will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 5. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. 6. The Employer agrees not to ask the employee to obtain a printout from the Social Security Page 12 of 25 E-Venry MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Dale 06/01/13 Verify a { Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 Administration number database (the Numident) or other written verification of the SSN from the SSA. B. REFERRAL TO DHS 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee's E-Verify case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee's response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. The Employer agrees to refer individuals to DHS only when the employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation. 4. If the employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer will instruct the employee to contact DHS through its toll -free hotline (as found on the referral letter) within eight Federal Government work days. 5. If the Employer finds a photo mismatch, the Employer must provide the photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmation notice and follow the instructions outlined in paragraph 1 of this section for tentative nonconfirmations, generally. 6. The Employer agrees that if an employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer will send a copy of the employee's Form 1-551, Form 1-766, U.S. Passport, or passport card to DHS for review by: a. Scanning and uploading the document, or b. Sending a photocopy of the document by express mail (furnished and paid for by the employer). 7. The Employer understands that if it cannot determine whether there is a photo match/mismatch, the Employer must forward the employee's documentation to DHS as described in the preceding paragraph. The Employer agrees to resolve the case as specified by the DHS representative who will determine the photo match or mismatch. 8. DHS will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 9. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. Page 13 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Dale 06/01/13 a Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-9 E-VeriFy Company to Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 ARTICLE IV SERVICE PROVISIONS A. NO SERVICE FEES 1. SSA and DHS will not charge the Employer or the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent for verification services performed under this MOU. The Employer is responsible for providing equipment needed to make inquiries. To access E-Verify, an Employer will need a personal computer with Internet access. ARTICLE V SYSTEM SECURITY AND MAINTENANCE A. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Software developed by Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must comply with federally - mandated information security policies and industry security standards to include but not limited to: a. Public Law 107-347, "E-Government Act of 2002, Title III, Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA)," December 2002. b. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum (M-10-15), "FY 2010 Reporting Instructions for the Federal Information Security Management Act and Agency Privacy Management," April 2010, c. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) and Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS). d. International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) 27002, Information Technology — Security Techniques — Code of Practice for Information Security Management. 2. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to update its Web Services interface to reflect system enhancements within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services User of the system update. The Web Services User will receive notice from DHS in the form of an Interface Control Agreement (ICA). The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to institute changes to its interface as identified in the ICA, including all functionality identified and all data elements detailed therein. 3. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate progress of its efforts to update its Web Services interface if and when DHS requests such progress reports. 4. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent acknowledges that if its system enhancements are not completed to the satisfaction of DHS or its assignees within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services User of the system update, then the Web Services User's E-Verify account may be suspended, and support for previous releases of E-Verify may no longer be available to the Web Services User. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent also acknowledges that DHS may suspend the Web Services User's account after the six-month period has elapsed. 5. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to incorporate error handling logic into its Page 14 of 25 E.Venfy MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 VeriFy 0 e' "r Company 10 Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 development or software to accommodate and act in a timely fashion should an error code be returned 6. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to complete the technical requirements testing which is confirmed upon receiving approval of test data and connectivity between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS. 7. DHS will not reimburse any Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or software developer who has expended resources in the development or maintenance of a Web Services interface if that party is unable, or becomes unable, to meet any of the requirements set forth in this MOU. S. Housing, development, infrastructure, maintenance, and testing of the Web Services applications may take place outside the United States and its territories, but testing must be conducted to ensure that the code is correct and secure. 9. If the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent includes an electronic Form 1-9 as part of its interface, then it must comply with the standards for electronic retention of Form 1-9 found in 8 CFR 274a.2(e). B. INFORMATION SECURITY REQUIREMENTS Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents performing verification services under this MOU must ensure that information that is shared between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS is appropriately protected comparable to the protection provided when the information is within the DHS environment [OMB Circular A-130 Appendix III]. To achieve this level of information security, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to institute the following procedures: 1. Conduct periodic assessments of risk, including the magnitude of harm that could result from the unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information and information systems that support the operations and assets of the DHS, SSA, and the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and its clients; 2. Develop policies and procedures that are based on risk assessments, cost-effectively reduce information security risks to an acceptable level, and ensure that information security is addressed throughout the life cycle of each organizational information system; 3. Implement subordinate plans for providing adequate information security for networks, facilities, information systems, or groups of information systems, as appropriate; 4. Conduct security awareness training to inform the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's personnel (including contractors and other users of information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization) of the information security risks associated with their activities and their responsibilities in complying with organizational policies and procedures designed to reduce these risks, 5. Develop periodic testing and evaluation of the effectiveness of information security policies, procedures, practices, and security controls to be performed with a frequency depending on risk, but no less than once per year; Page 15 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Dale 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-10 Veri . _- Company 10 Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 6. Develop a process for planning, implementing, evaluating, and documenting remedial actions to address any deficiencies in the information security policies, procedures, and practices of the organization; 7. Implement procedures for detecting, reporting, and responding to security incidents; 8. Create plans and procedures to ensure continuity of operations for information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization; 9. In information -sharing environments, the information owner is responsible for establishing the rules for appropriate use and protection of the subject information and retains that responsibility even when the information is shared with or provided to other organizations [NIST SP 800-37). 10. DHS reserves the right to restrict Web Services calls from certain IP addresses. 11. DHS reserves the right to audit the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's application. 12, Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents and Software Developers agree to cooperate willingly with the DHS assessment of information security and privacy practices used by the company to develop and maintain the software. C. DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS 1. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must practice proper Internet security; this means using HTTP over SSL/TLS (also known as HTTPS) when accessing DHS information resources such as E-Verify [NIST SP 800-95]. Internet security practices like this are necessary because Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), which provides a basic messaging framework on which Web Services can be built, allows messages to be viewed or modified by attackers as messages traverse the Internet and is not independently designed with all the necessary security protocols for E-Verify use. 2. In accordance with DHS standards, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to appropriately protect the information shared under this MOU against loss, theft, misuse, unauthorized access, and improper disclosure, copying use, modification or deletion. 3. Any data transmission requiring encryption shall comply with the following standards: • Products using FIPS 197 Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithms with at least 256- bit encryption that has been validated under HIPS 140-2. • NSA Type 2 or Type 1 encryption. 4. User ID Management (Set Standard): All information exchanged between the parties under this MOU will be done only through authorized Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent representatives identified above. 5. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to use the E-Verify browser instead of its own interface if it has not yet upgraded its interface to comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) system changes. In addition, Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents whose interfaces do not support Page 16 of 25 E-Verity MOU for Employers Using a Web services E-Verify Employer Agent; Revision Date 06101/13 E-Ved 1W . Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 the Form 1-9 from 2/2/2009 or 6/7/2009 should also use the E-Verify browser until the system upgrade is completed. 6. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to use the E-Verify browser instead of its own interface if it has not completed updates to its system within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent of the system update. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent can resume use of its interface once it is up-to-date, unless the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent has been suspended or terminated from continued use of the system. D. COMMUNICATIONS 1. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents and Software Developers agree to develop an electronic system that is not subject to any agreement that would restrict access to and use of by an agency of the United Stales. 2. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop effective controls to ensure the integrity, accuracy and reliability of its electronic system. 3. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop an inspection and quality assurance program that regularly, at least once per year, evaluates the electronic system, and includes periodic checks of electronically stored information. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to share the results of its regular inspection and quality assurance program with DHS upon request. 4. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop an electronic system with the ability to produce legible copies of applicable notices, letters, etc. 5. All information exchanged between the parties under this MOU will be in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, including but not limited to, information security guidelines of the sending party with respect to any information that is deemed Personally Identifiable Information (PII), including but not limited to the employee or applicant's Social Security number, alien number, date of birth, or other information that may be used to identify the individual. 6. Suspected and confirmed information security breaches must be reported to DHS according to Article II.A.17. Reporting such breaches does not relieve the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent from further requirements as directed by state and local law. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is subject to applicable state laws regarding data protection and incident reporting in addition to the requirements herein. E. SOFTWARE DEVELOPER RESTRICTIONS 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that if it develops a Web Services interface and sells such interface, then it can be held liable for any misuse by the company that purchases the interface. It is the responsibility of the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent to ensure that its interface is used in accordance with E-Verify policies and procedures. 2. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide software updates to each client who purchases its software. Because of the frequency Web Services updates, an ongoing relationship between the software developer and the client is necessary. Page 17 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-11 VeriFy �: M Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 3. DHS reserves the right to terminate the access of any software developer with or without notice who creates or uses an interface that does not comply with E-Verify procedures. 4. Web Services Software Developers pursuing software development independent of serving clients as a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent are not eligible to receive an ICA. At this time, E-Verify does not permit Web Services software development without also being a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or Web Services Employer F. PENALTIES 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any failure on its part to comply with the terms of the MOU may result in account suspension, termination, or other adverse action. 2. DHS is not liable for any financial losses to Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, its clients, or any other party as a result of your account suspension or termination. ARTICLE VI MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION A. MODIFICATION 1. This MOU is effective upon the signature of all parties and shall continue in effect for as long as the SSA and DHS operates the E-Verify program unless modified in writing by the mutual consent of all parties. 2. Any and all E-Verify system enhancements by DHS or SSA, including but not limited to E-Verify checking against additional data sources and instituting new verification policies or procedures, will be covered under this MOU and will not cause the need for a supplemental MOU that outlines these changes. B. TERMINATION 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may terminate this MOU and its participation in E-Verify at any time upon 30 days prior written notice to the other parties. In addition, any Employer represented by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may voluntarily terminate its MOU upon giving DHS 30 days' written notice. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may not refuse to terminate the Employer based upon an outstanding bill for verification services. 2. Notwithstanding Article V, part A of this MOU, DHS may terminate this MOU, and thereby the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent's participation in E-Verify, with or without notice at any time if deemed necessary because of the requirements of law or policy, or upon a determination by SSA or DHS that there has been a breach of system integrity or security by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or Employer, or a failure on the part of either party to comply with established E-Verify procedures and/or legal requirements. The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, termination of this MOU by any party for any reason may negatively affect the performance of its contractual responsibilities. Similarly, the Employer understands that if it is in a state where E-Verify is mandatory, termination of this by any party MOU may negatively affect the Employer's business. Page 18 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Dale 06/01/13 E VeriFy - V,1 Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 3. A Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent for an Employer that is a Federal contractor may terminate this MOU when the Federal contract that requires its participation in E-Verify is terminated or completed. In such cases, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must provide written notice to DHS. If the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent fails to provide such notice, then that Employer will remain an E-Verify participant, will remain bound by the terms of this MOU that apply to non -Federal contractor participants, and will be required to use the E-Verify procedures to verify the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees. 4. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that E-Verify is not liable for any losses, financial or otherwise, if the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer is terminated from E-Verify. ARTICLE VII PARTIES A. Some or all SSA and DHS responsibilities under this MOU may be performed by contractor(s), and SSA and DHS may adjust verification responsibilities between each other as necessary. By separate agreement with DHS, SSA has agreed to perform its responsibilities as described in this MOU. B. Nothing in this MOU is intended, or should be construed, to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any third party against the United States, its agencies, officers, or employees, or against the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, its agents, officers, or employees. C. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may not assign, directly or indirectly, whether by operation of law, change of control or merger, all or any part of its rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of DHS, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Any attempt to sublicense, assign, or transfer any of the rights, duties, or obligations herein is void. D. Each party shall be solely responsible for defending any claim or action against it arising out of or related to E-Verify or this MOU, whether civil or criminal, and for any liability wherefrom, including (but not limited to) any dispute between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer and any other person or entity regarding the applicability of Section 403(d) of IIRIRA to any action taken or allegedly taken by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer. E. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that its participation in E-Verify is not confidential information and may be disclosed as authorized or required by law and DHS or SSA policy, including but not limited to, Congressional oversight, E-Verify publicity and media inquiries, determinations of compliance with Federal contractual requirements, and responses to inquiries under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). F. The individuals whose signatures appear below represent that they are authorized to enter into this MOU on behalf of the Employer, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS respectively. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that any inaccurate statement, representation, data or other information provided to DHS may subject the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, as the case may be, its subcontractors, its employees, or its representatives to: (1) prosecution for false statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or; (2) immediate termination of its MOU and/or; (3) possible debarment or suspension. Page 19 of 25 E-Venfy MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-12 E-VeriFy Company ID Number. 11557 Client Company ID Number. BB5319 G. The foregoing constitutes the full agreement on this subject between OHS, the Employer, and the E-Verify Employer Agent. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (Employer) hereby designates and appoints HireRight, Inc. (v26) (E-Verify Employer Agent) including its officers and employees, as the E-Verify Employer Agent for the purpose of carrying out (Employer) responsibilities under the MOU between the Employer, the E-Verify Employer Agent, and DHS. If you have any questions, contact E-Verify at 1-888-464-4216. Page 20 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E Verify Employer Agent I Revision Dale 06101n3 r VeriFy Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 8p5319 Approved by: Employer Jacobs Engineering Group Inc Name (Please Type or Print) Title -3uti-C TCy` VPr 1l w^N^ Reaowce= 8tws�tiiS � i{'�Ojs. Sign re � � ql---- Dale 6 /I a zofs Verify mplo t HireRight, Inc. (M) Name (Please Type or Print) Me Kathleen Magelssen Signature Date Electronically Signed 06/10/2015 Department of Homeland Security — Verification Division Name (Please Type or Print) Tine ignature Date Page 21 of 25 E-VentyMOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-13 Verify Company lD Number. 115s, Clienl ComWnylDNumbm, 655719 Approved by: mployer J- Eq .Ma Gnav bw ame,Pease Type or Print) - ale 3'lif 7cln'rd.� B�oW- Upr It....^w. Reaowo.s Bcaa4ii5 a. al N�OTS. lgr re ate 6 �t a 1 z17r5 -Verify mpl0 t Hire3k}�l inc (v26) Name (Please Type or Print) Kamleen Title - . - ignature ate Ele:.bonically s'— M1012015 epadment of Homeland security - Verincation D)Wvision Name (Please Type o• Prirt) II if. M� n ure P r a v �'�" K1 _LQkl .5 Pepe 210125 E v,nly ra0tl 1p E„ ""s y,V s wrd Smlm E Vmlry Emdoyei Aaenl I eevblm Del, o6o,13 VeriFy 4% �.�� . Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number. 805319 Information Required for the E-Verify Program Information relating to your Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc Company Name 155 North Lake Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 Company Facility Address 125 Broadway Ave Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Company Alternate Address County or Parish LOS ANGELES Employer Identification Number 954061636 North American Industry Sal Classification Systems Code Parent Company umber of Employees 10,000 and over umber of Sites Verified for 625 Page 22 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verily Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-14 Verify Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 Are you verifying for more than 1 site? If yes, please provide the number of sites verified for in each State: CALIFORNIA 88 site(s) SOUTH CAROLINA 12 site(s) ALASKA 3 site(s) SOUTH DAKOTA 1 sile(s) VIRGINIA 16 site(s) TENNESSEE 16site(s) WASHINGTON 22 site(s) TEXAS 81 site(s) ALABAMA 6 site(s) UTAH 6 site(s) WISCONSIN 7 site(s) ARKANSAS 3 site(s) WEST VIRGINIA 6 site(s) ARIZONA 7 site(s) WYOMING 2 site(s) COLORADO 26 site(s) CONNECTICUT 5 site(s) GIST OF COL 17 site(s) DELAWARE 2 site(s) FLORIDA 33 site(s) GEORGIA 37 site(s) GUAM 1 site(s) HAWAII 2 site(s) IOWA 6 site(s) IDAHO 1 site(s) ILLINOIS 16 site(s) INDIANA 6 site(s) KANSAS 4 site(s) KENTUCKY 8 site(s) LOUISIANA 31 site(s) MASSACHUSETTS 10 site(s) MARYLAND 16 site(s) MAINE 2 site(s) MICHIGAN 6 site(s) MINNESOTA 4 site(s) MISSOURI 3 site(s) MISSISSIPPI 3 site(s) MONTANA 2 site(s) NORTH CAROLINA 8 site(s) NORTH DAKOTA 1 site(s) NEBRASKA 3 site(s) NEW HAMPSHIRE 1 site(s) NEW JERSEY 9 site(s) NEW MEXICO 4 site(s) NEVADA 9 site(s) NEW YORK 27 site(s) OHIO 17 site(s) OKLAHOMA 4 site(s) OREGON 3 site(s) PENNSYLVANIA 20 site(s) PUERTO RICO 3 site(s) RHODE ISLAND 1 site(s) Page 23 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01113 Verify Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 885319 Information relating to the Program Administrator(s) for your Company on policy questions or operational problems: Name Donna King Phone Number (865) 220 - 4985 Fax Number Email Address Donna. King@jambs.mm Page 24 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06101113 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-15 Verify Company ID Number: 11557 Client Company ID Number: 895319 Page intentionally left blank Page 25 of 25 E-Verity MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 06/01/13 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-16 C; erCounty Administrative Services Deparsnent Procurement Services Division Form 4: Vendor Submittal -Local Vendor Preference Certification (Check Appropriate Boxes Below) State of Florida (Select County if Vendor is described as a Local Business) ® Collier County ❑ Lee County Vendor affirms that it is a local business as defined by the Procurement Ordinance of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Regulations Thereto. As defined in Section Fifteen of the Collier County Procurement Ordinance: Local business means the vendor has a current Business Tax Receipt issued by the Collier County Tax Collector prior to bid or proposal submission to do business within Collier County, and that identifies the business with a permanent physical business address located within the limits of Collier County from which the vendor's staff operates and performs business in an area zoned for the conduct of such business. A Post Office Box or a facility that receives mail, or a non -permanent structure such as a construction trailer, storage shed, or other non -permanent structure shall not be used for the purpose of establishing said physical address. In addition to the foregoing, a vendor shall not be considered a "local business" unless it contributes to the economic development and well-being of Collier County in a verifiable and measurable way. This may include, but not be limited to, the retention and expansion of employment opportunities, support and increase to the County's tax base, and residency of employees and principals of the business within Collier County. Vendors shall affurn in writing their compliance with the foregoing at the time of submitting their bid or proposal to be eligible for consideration as a "local business" under this section. A vendor who misrepresents the Local Preference status of its firm in a proposal or bid submitted to the County will lose the privilege to claim Local Preference status for a period of up to one year under this section. Vendor must complete the following information Year Business Established in ®Collier County or ❑ Lee County: 2004 Number of Employees (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers): 58,115 Number of Employees Living h1 ® Collier County or ® Lee (Including Owners) or Corporate Officers): Collier: 25; Lee: 30 If requested by the County, Vendor will be required to provide documentation substantiating the information given in this certification. Failure to do so will result in vendor's submission being deemed not applicable. Sign and Date Certification: Under Penalties of Periurv. I certify that the information shown on this form is correct to my kxi—ledize. Company Name: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Date: 7/22/22 Address in Collier or Lee County: 9010 Straits Stell Court, Unit 108, Naples, FL 34109 Signature: (?I Pai� Title: Vice President Form W-9 Request for Taxpayer Give Form to the (opt,. October 201M Identification Number and Certification requester. Do not d meTrmetay send to the IRS. 10==Dapalmenl w Rererae sl ► Oo to www.Us.Dor/FORnW9 far instnxdons and the latest inforn atop. �— 1 Nome (as shown on your kaomer Im return). Name Is mWited on INs Ift do rot leave this one dank. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. 2 Business mme'tHmegeNed entity name, it dllferenl 1— above 3 Check sppropnaie box for leoerdl tax clasanicetkln of the person whose rerne Is wished on line 1. Check only one of the following seven boxes. A Exemptions (coax apply edy to cadaln entitles, riot Individuals; see r-� Usdo 0 ❑ Indlvltluae pmpnghn C Corporation ❑ S Ccrporaan ❑ Partnership ❑ TnnUenate 1.1-11phs on page 3): raj single -member LLC Exanexpayeecode0lantl p 'U ❑ Limited liability company. Enter the tax ctassftkatlon(C•C corporation, S.S corporation. P.PeMarshlp)► 'd 2 Note: Check the appropriate box In the arts above for the tax classif Ion of the single -member owner. Do MI check Exemption from FATCA rep,Vng LLC If lne LLC le chests ld as a sl gb-me opertI.0 that b dbragorded from the owner unksts Ilia owner of Ins LLC le nolher LLC that is not disregarded from the owner for U.S. federal tax paos pes. Oth—lse, a sths4 m mber LLC that coa W anyl a IS b disegarded from the owner shad check the appropriate box for Ina tax clastifllan of IN owner. otter (see Inslraa ons) ► 11none ms®.e„wnwanmar w. ust y5 Address (number.street. aro apt. or$Un10 no.) See Instructions, Requester's name and scones(opWral) 7999 BRYAN STREET e elate, ZIP coo DALLAS, TXX 75207 T Let account hunter(s) hoe (optional) MOTIN Taxpayer Identification Number MN) Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. The TIN provided must match the name given on tine 1 to avoid I �! ..... nunwr j—�TI _TI�jI backup wllhh. ors r or individuals,etorrdie egard d nerallyentity, your see the foral ctrosecurity number1. let&. Hgwever, fora � -m J�I�I�L. I resident alien, sole proprietor, disregarded is d entity, see the litre, tfor Pan 1, later. Far other entities, it is your employer Identification number (EIN). If you do not have a number, see How to get a TIN, Wier. or Note: If the account is In more than one time, see the instructions for line 1. Also see What Name end I Employer ka ificral.. number Number To Cube the Asquester for guidelines on whose number to enter. 7-'-1 i.I I I 1 .1 1 A Under penalties of perjury, I certify that: 1. The number shown on this form Is my Correct taxpayer Identification number (or 1 am walling for a number to be issued to me); and 2. 1 am not subject to backup withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all Interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding; and 3. 1 am a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person (defined below); and 4. The FATCA code(s) entered on this form Of any) Indicating that I am exempt from FATCA mooning is correct. Certification instructions. You must aaea out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have faded to report all interest and dividends on your tax rerun. For real estate transactions, item 2 does not apply. For mortgage Interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, contributions to an individual retirement arrangement (IRA), and generally, payments other than interest and dvii ou are not required to sign the certification, but you must provide you correct TIN. See the Instructions for Part 11. later. SignI ptlwM June 28, 2021 Hotel U.S.us_ae__n"► General Ins ns • Form 1090-DIV (dividends, including those from stocks or mutual funds) Section references are t m internal Revenue Code unless otherwise . Fortin 1099•MISC (various types of Income, prizes, awards, or gross noted. Future developments. For the Wiest Information about developments related to Form W-9 and its instructions, such as legislation enacted after they were published, go to wwwJnrgw1FomrW9. Purpose of Form An individual or entity (Fonm W-9 requester) who is required to file an information return with the IRS must obtain your correct taxpayer Identification number(TIN) which may be your social security number ISSN), Individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN), adoption taxpayer Identification number (ATIN), or employer Identification number (EIN), to report on an information return the amount paid to you, or other amount reportable on an Information return. Examples of information returns include, but are not limited to, the following, • Form IC99-INT finterest earned or paid) Cat, No. 10231X proceeds) • Form 1099-8 (stock or mutual fund sets and certain other transactions by brokers) • Form 1099-S (proceeds from real estate transactions) • Form 1099-K (merchant card and third party network transactions) • Form 1098 (home mortgage interest), 109E-E (student (can interest), 1098-T (tuition) • Form 1099-C (canceled debt) • Form 1099-A (acquisition or abandonment of secured property) Use Form W-9 ordy if you are a U.S. person (including a resident alien), to provide your correct TIN. if yw do not return Form W-9 to the requester with a TIN, you might be subject to backup withholding. See What is backup withholding, late, Form W-9 (Rev. 10.2016) Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-17 Jacobs acknowledges the Insurance and Bonding Requirements document provided as part of the bid solicitation package. Below is an example of our standard Certificate of Liability Insurance, which can be finalized and provided to the County upon award. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 06/17/220222 Y' THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer ri hts to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsements . PRODUCER LIC #0437153 1-212-948-1306 Harsh Risk & Insurance Service, CIRTS_Supportojacobs.c 633 W. Fifth Street Lo9 Angeles, CA 90071 IIN.NT T PHONE FAX N o'1-212-948-1306 E-MAIL ADORERS: INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE — INSURERA: ACE AMER INS CO 22667 INSURED Jacob, Engineering Group Inc. C/O Global Riek Maadgement 1000 NiIBhire Blvd., Suite 1140 Los Angeles, CA 90017 INSURERS INSURER C INSURERS: INSURER E: INSURER F: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. IFF LTR TYPEOFINSURANCE POLICY NUMBER MMDDVIYY M LICY EXP LIMBS A X COMMERCIAL GENERALUABIUTY CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR X CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY HDO G72496176 07/01/22 07/01/23 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 PREMSES EaoAMAGE TO �a6r m $ 500,000 MEDEXP(Any.. Perron) $ 5,000 PERSONAL&ADVINJURY $ 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: X POLICY jRT 71 DOC OTHER' GENERALAGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS -COMPIOP ADS $ 2,000,000 $ A q OBI%LIABILITY XUTO ANY ALTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY ISA H25568230 07/01/22 07/01/23 CEOMBBIINOEEDISINGLE LIMIT g 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY(" M) $ BODILY INJURY (Per a.ddant) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE P.—deni $ E UMBRELLALIAB EXCESS IJAB OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ A A A MRKEISCOMPENRATION AND EMPLOYERSLIABILITY YIN ANYPROPRIETOWPARTNEWEXECUTIVE [N] OFFIC (M..dI ry I. NHREXCLUDE07 IOES-11-EON OF OPERATIONS below MIA SCP C68914619 (WI) WLR C6891453A (ADS) WCD C68914577 (ON)- 07/01/22 17/01/22 07/01/22 07/01/23 07/01/23 07/01/23 X STATUTE ER' - El, EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASEEAEMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 A PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY EON 021655065 013 07/01/22 07/01/23 PER CLAIM/PER AGG 5,000,000 DESCRIPDONOFOPERATIONSIWWIONSIVEHICLES (ACORD101,A0dI1i.n.IRemarks S.NedNle,mayb.a8e.be0lf....pa.i..qui.dI RE: EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE ONLY. +THIS IS A SAMPLE CERTIFICATE ONLY*. THE ACTUAL CERTIFICATE FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS NEGOTIATED IN THE FINAL CONTRACT, CONSISTENT WITH POLICY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 1999 Bryan Street, Snit, 1200 AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATNE Dallas, TX 75201 `,3—yyJ.➢7_ USA V ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Cart Renewal 65805032 SUPPLEMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DATE O6/17/2022 NAME OF INSURED: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Additional Description of ODeraticns/Remarks from Pane 1: Additional Information: -$2,000,000 SIR FOR STATE OF: OHIO SUPP (05104) Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page A-18 Jacobs Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. C01t County Email: Leeann.Charles(cdcolliercountvfl.gov Telephone: (239) 252-4270 Procurement Services Division Addendum 1 Date: June 17, 2022 From: Leeann Charles, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum #1, 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening The following changes are made to the above -mentioned Collier County solicitation: Change. To upload revised Solicitation. If you require additional information, please post a question on our BidSync (www.bidsvnc.com) bidding platform under the solicitation for this project. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. Ellen B. Patterson, Vice President 7/22/22 (Signature) Date Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Name of Firm) COLLIe'Y' County Email: Leeann.CharlesAcolliercountvfl.gov Telephone: (239)252-4270 Procurement Services Division Addendum 2 Date: July 1, 2022 From: Leeann Charles, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum #2, 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening The following changes are made to the above -mentioned Collier County solicitation: Change. Extend the Q & A deadline and Bid due date. QUESTION & ANSWER DEADLINE: PM July 12, 2022 AT 5:00 PM OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: July 19, 2022 AT 3:00 PM If you require additional information, please post a question on our BidSync (www.bidsvnc.com) bidding platform under the solicitation for this project. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. Ellen B. Patterson, Vice President 7/22/22 (Signature) Date Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Name of Firm) Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page B-1 Co ler County Email: Leeann.Charles(&,colliercountvfl.eov Telephone: (239) 252-4270 Procurement Services Division Addendum 3 Date: July 13, 2022 From: Leeann Charles, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum #3, 22-8006 Design Services for Wilson Blvd Widening The following changes are made to the above -mentioned Collier County solicitation: Change 1. Upload CAD Files for "Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor Study" • Alignment File • Design File • Survey File. Change 2. Upload CAD Files for "Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension project" • Drainage File • Design File • Signing and Pavement Markings File • Alignment File • Ponds Design File Change 3. Extend the Q & A deadline and Bid due date. QUESTION & ANSWER DEADLINE: PM July 19, 2022 AT 5:00 PM OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: nM July 28, 2022 AT 3:00 PM If you require additional information, please post a question on our BidSync (www.bidsync.coml bidding platform under the solicitation for this project. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. Ellen B. Patterson, Vice President 7/22/22 (Signature) IDate Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Name of Firm) Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page B-2 Jacobs Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. Collier County Business Tax License — Engineering Business COLLIER COUNTY BUSINESS TAX BUSINESS TAX NUMBER: 220847 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR - 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES FLORIDA 34104 - (239( 252-2477 VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT: www.colliertaxcdlecar.com THIS RECEIPT EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 DISPLAY AT PLACE OF BUSINESS FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. LOCATION: 9010 STRADA STELL CT#108 ZONED: COMM / PUD ♦ ` FAILURE TO DO SO IS CONTRARY TO LOCAL LAWS. BUSINESS PHONE: 214-583-8441 STATE OR COUNTY LIC #: 2822 w; LEGAL FORM O Corporation 2 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC �._ JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC 9191 JAMAICA ST ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 CLASSIFICATION: ENGINEERING BUSINESS �.A -THIS TAX IS NON -REFUNDABLE - CLASSIFICATION CODE: 03600101 -, ^^�" DATE 10/13/2021 - - --- - -`.J AMOUNT 30.00 This document is a business tax only. This is not certification that licensee is qualified. RECEIPT 502-22-00180738 It does not permit the licensee to violate any existing regulatory zoning laws of the state, county, or cities 77 QQ�� 7J nor does it exempt the licensee from any other taxes or permits that may be required by law. 1�Ob ylOriGfC ?�P/t Collier County Business Tax License — Administrative COLLIER COUNTY BUSINESS TAX BUSINESS TAX NUMBER: 033232 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR - 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES FLORIDA 34104 - (239) 252-2477 VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT: w .colliertaxcdledor.com THIS RECEIPT EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 DISPLAY AT PLACE OF BUSINESS FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. LOCATION: 9010 STRADA STELL CT #108 ` R FAILURE TO DO SO IS CONTRARY TO LOCAL LAWS. ZONED: COMM / PUD V`�O� BUSINESS PHONE: 596-1715 GALFORM v2 CH2M HILL, INC STATE OR COUNTY LIC #: ' •O -Corporation CH2M HILL, INC ATTN: TAX DEPT. 9191 JAMACIA ST ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 CLASSIFICATION: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE -THIS TAX IS NON-REFUNDABLE- CLASSIFICATIONCODE: 03606401 • :° O� DATE 10/13/2021 AMOUNT 30.00 This document is a business tax only. This is not certification that licensee is qualified. ` RECEIPT 502-22-00180750 It does not permit the licensee to violate any existing regulatory zoning laws of the state, coun�or alias y �• AA nor does h exempt the licensee from any other taxes or permits that may be required by law.O�Os'Ire%6i�LwP/G State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. is a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on February 12, 1987. The document number of this corporation is P13217. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2022, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 13, 2022, and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Thirteenth day ofJanuary, 2022 Secretary of State Tracking Number: 9012666043CC To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page C-1 6/27/22, 8:22 PM DBPR - JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC., Registry THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION labon HOME CONTACT US MY ACC(- orap&rnnntolfe= ONLINE SERVICES LICENSEE DETAILS 9:21:53 PM 6/27/2022 Apply for a License Verify a Licensee View Food & Lodging Inspections File a Complaint Continuing Education Course Search View Application Status Find Exam Information Unlicensed Activity Search AB&T Delinquent Invoice & Activity List Search Licensee Information Name: JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. (Primary Name) Main Address: 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS Texas 90017 License Mailing: 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS TX 75201 County: OUT OF STATE License Location: 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS TX 75201 County: OUT OF STATE License Information License Type: Registry Rank: Registry License Number: 2822 Status: Current Licensure Date: 05/21/1979 Expires: Special Qualification Effective Qualifications Alternate Names View Related License Information View License Complaint ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2601 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee FL 32399 :: Email: Customer Contact Center :: Customer Contact Center: 850.487.1395 The State of Flonda is an AA/EEO employer. Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida. Privacy Statement Under Florida law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public -records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact the office by phone or by traditional mail. If you have any questions, please contact 850.487.1395. *Pursuant to Section 455.275(1), Florida Statutes, effective October 1, 2012, licensees licensed under Chapter 455, F.S. must https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetaii.asp?SID=&id=06e137b7dod93e7d86f7664ccdaad3ea 1/2 6/27/22, 7:05 PM DBPR - GRAMER, WILLIAM J., Professional Engineer THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ^ rWedr.-r lauun HOME CONTACT US MY ACCOUNT ONLINE SERVICES LICENSEE DETAILS 8:04:45 PM 6/27/2022 Licensee Information Apply for a License Name: GRAMER, WILLIAM J. (Primary Name) Verify a Licensee Main Address: 2229 CAMPESTRE TERRACE NAPLES Florida 34119 View Food & Lodging Inspections County: COLLIER File a Complaint Continuing Education Course License Information Search License Type: Professional Engineer View Application Status Rank: Prof Engineer License Number: 59090 Find Exam Information Status: Current,Active Unlicensed Activity Search Licensure Date: 10/23/2002 AB&T Delinquent Invoice &Activity Expires: 02/28/2023 List Search Special Qualification Effective Qualifications Civil 10/23/2002 Alternate Names View Related License Information View License Complaint ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2601 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee FL 32399 :: Email: Customer Contact Center :: Customer Contact Center: 850.487.1395 The Stale of Florida is an AA/EEO employer. Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida. Privacy Statement Under Florida law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public -records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact the office by phone or by traditional mail. If you have any questions, please contact 850 487.1395. "Pursuant to Section 455.275(l), Florida Statutes, effective October 1, 2012, licensees licensed under Chapter 455. F.S. must provide the Department with an email address if they have one. The emails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email atltlresses are public record. If you do not wish to supply a personal address, please provide the Department with an email address which can be matle available to the public. Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https:/Aw .myfoddalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=D1 D545FDF67F448DD3F5DB65B26D3526 IB7 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page C-2 7:55:23 AM 611112021 Data Contained In Search Results Is Current As Of 06/11/2021 07:53 AM. Search Results Please see our glossary of terms for an explanation of the license status shown in these search results. For additional information, including any complaints or discipline, click on the name. Name License License Type Name Number/ Status/Expires Type Rank Registry JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP Primary 2822 Current INC. Registry License Location Address*: 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Main Address*: 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 90017 Mailing Address*: 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Continuing Education Provider JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 46 CEP Current Current - Approved INC Approved O /31/2021 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREETTAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 2032 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREET TAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 1984 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREET TAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 1952 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREETTAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 1987 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREETTAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 2021 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREETTAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP,. Primary 2017 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREETTAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 1983 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREETTAMPA, FL 80112 Engineers CE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, Primary 1950 Current Course INC. Course 05/31/2017 Main Address*: 201 N. FRANKLIN STREETTAMPA, FL 80112 Page Iof5 00000 * denotes Main Address - This address is the Primary Address on file. Mailing Address - This is the address where the mail associated with a particular license will be sent (if different from the Main or License Location addresses). License Location Address - This is the address where the place of business is physically located. 2601 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee FL 32399 :: Email: Customer Contact Center :: Customer Contact Center: 850.487.1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer. Copyright 2007-2010 Slate of Florida. Privacy Statement Under Florida law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public -records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact the office by phone or by treditional mail. If you have any questions, please contact 850.487.1395. *Pursuant to Section 455.275(1), Florida Statutes, effective October 1, 2012, licensees licensed under Chapter 455, F.S. must pro,,de the Department with an email atltlress if they have one. The emails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email adtlresses are public record. If you do not wish to supply a personal address, please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page C-3 Jacobs SunBiz Profile 6/17/22, 11:28 AM Detail by Entity Name DIVISION or COnrOR—ONs bt�/t1D,v aj .........1,�1 m� oI frhd 1rur uj R-idn wrbsfrr Department of State / Division of Corp radon / Search Records / Sar& y Entity / Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. Filing Information Document Number P13217 FEI/EIN Number 95-4081636 Date Filed 02/12/1987 State DE Status ACTIVE Last Event AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 02/26/1990 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Changed: 04/05/2018 'ling Address MANISHA GADHAVE, JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD 12B EMPIRE TOWER CLOUD CITY CAMPUS NAVI MUMBAI 400 708 IN Changed: 02/05/2020 RegisteredAgent Name 8 Address CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 1200 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD PLANTATION, FL 33324 Name Changed: 06/30/1992 Address Changed: 06/30/1992 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title President https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder-JACOBSE... 1 /5 6/17/22, 11:28 AM Detail by Entity Name PRAGADA, ROBERTV 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Title Treasurer CARLIN, MICHAEL 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Title Secretary JOHNSON, JUSTIN 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Title VP BUNDERSON, MICHAEL 155 NORTH LAKE AVENUE PASADENA, CA 91101 Title VP MEINHART, TOM 10 TENTH STREET SUITE 1400 ATLANTA, GA 30309 Title Authorized Representative KIRBY, DANIEL 200 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE SUITE 900 ORLANDO, FL 32801 Title Authorized Representative STEJSKAL, DAVID 25 West Cedar Street Suite 350 Pensacola, FL 32502 Title VP NEIN, BRETT 1100 N. GLEBE RD,5TH FLOOR ARLINGTON, VA 22201 Title VP JONES, KEITH B 46 LIBERTY INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY MCDONOUGH, GA 30253 https://search.sun biz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/Search ResultDetail?inq ui rytype=EntityName&d imctionType=Initial&search NameOrder-JACOBSE... 2/5 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page C-4 6117122, 11:28 AM Detail by Entity Name Title VP PATTERSON, ELLEN 550W, CYPRESS CREEK ROAD FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309 Title VP HOOPER, CORY 200 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE SUITE 900 ORLANDO, FL 32801 Title VP WATSON, KATUS 5401 W. Kennedy Blvd Ste 300 TAMPA, FL 33609 Title VP UCHIL, VINAY 10 TENTH STREET SUITE 1400 ATLANTA, GA 30309 Title Director DEMETRIOU, STEVEN J 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Title President BERRYMAN, KEVIN C 1999 BRYAN STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Title VP ASHMAN, DAVID 5401 W. Kennedy Blvd Ste 300 Tampa, FL 33609 Title VP Lazaro, Alberto 3150 SW 38 Avenue Miami, FL 33146 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityNameBd imctionType=Initial&seamhNameOrder--JACOBSE... 3/5 6/17/22, 11:28 AM https:A 2021 01/14/2021 2021 06/07/2021 2022 01/13/2022 Document Images Detail by Entity Name 01/13/2022—ANNUAL REPORT Mew Image in PDF format 09/28/2021 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF formal 06/07/2021 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 01/14/2021 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 02/05/2020 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 02/08/2019 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF formal 09/26/2018 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 05/21/2018 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/18/2018 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/08/2018 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/05/2018 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 08/11/2017— AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF fonnat 01/19/2017 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 05/17/2016 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/28/2016—ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04117/2015—ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF fonnat 05/28/2014 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04115/2014 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 01127/2014 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 03105/2013 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 07110/2012—ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 02109/2012 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF fonnat 09/30/2011 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 06/30/2011 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 02/08/2011 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 03/31/2010 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF fonnat 11/0512009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/28/2009 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF fonnat 04/02/2008 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/26/2007 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 05/02/2008 —ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/03/2005 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/2]/2004 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 05/02/2003 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/1]/2002—ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 05/03/2001 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format OS/03/2000—ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 05/08/1999 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew Image In PDF format 04/30/1998 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/25/1997 —ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 04/23/1996 — ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF format 3earch.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityNameBd imctionType=Initial&seamhNameOrder--JACOBSE... 4/5 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page C-5 11 Jacobs 6/17/22, 11:28 AM Detail by Entity Name 05/01/1995-ANNUAL REPORT Mew image in PDF tonnat https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorpomtionSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquiryVpe=EntityName&dimctionType=Initial&searchNameOrder--JACOBSE... 5/5 Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page C-6 Jacobs Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. TEAM MEMBER RESUMES — KEY PERSONNEL Bill Gramer, PE, AICP PROJECT MANAGER/DEVELOPER AND ADJACENT PROJECT COORDINATION/HIGHWAY AND ROADWAY/MOT (JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Bill brings more than 35 years of experience managing and QUALIFICATIONS coordinating a wide variety of transportation and transit BS, Civil Engineering, projects, including planning, traffic, roadway, drainage, Polytechnic utility, environmental, small local roadways, major urban University, NY arterials, state routes, and interstate highways. He has managed or coordinated 45 different general service REGISTRATIONS/ contracts for clients throughout Florida, including Collier CERTIFICATIONS County. Bill has expertise in project management, roadway Professional and transit studies and design, bicycle and pedestrian Engineer: plans (including experience designing over 100 miles FL (#49117) of sidewalks, pathways, and bicycle lanes), design -build Certified Planner: criteria packages, underground utility design/relocations, AICP (#314390) Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies, and community outreach. He has also managed over 40 public YEARS OF involvement meetings and over 100 project stakeholder EXPERIENCE meetings. 35 Selected Projects Project Manager. Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Jacobs conducted a study to evaluate potential roadway corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road in northern Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects, and the overall cost of each option. The project also included adding sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes and enhancing the existing bus stops. As PM, Bill managed the alternatives analysis to determine the best -suited alignment for Wilson Boulevard, which considered impacts to residential and commercial properties and impacts to the existing County production wells along the project corridor. Bill managed several successful workshops with the County regarding a left, center, and right alignment and the associated impacts, as well as additional ROW required. Bill managed an extensive public involvement process, which included a public meeting, social media engagement, mailer/newsletter, the project website, and an online survey with several public -friendly exhibits to portray project alternatives, such as complex 3D designs and renderings to show design features of the recommended alternative. Bill successfully presented the results of the study and recommendation for approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Project Manager. Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study, Collier County, FL. Bill managed a congestion analysis for future (5-year and 20-year) conditions along an approximately 2.3-mile segment along Immokalee Road from of Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, including nine intersections. Jacobs obtained traffic counts, evaluated surrounding land use, and projected traffic forecasts along the corridor and at the intersections for existing (2019), 2025, and 2040 conditions. Due to the severe congestion projected and limited right-of-way (ROW) available, the team performed an alternatives analysis evaluating both conventional and innovative alternatives at each of the intersections. The team modeled the corridor in SYNCHRO software by Trafficware to conduct the analysis for delay, volume to capacity ratio, and level of service for existing and future conditions for the no -build and build scenarios. Types of innovative improvements evaluated at each of the nine intersections included a continuous flow intersection (CFI), jug handle, single point urban interchange (SPUI), restricted crossing U-Turn (R-CUT), diverging diamond interchange (DDI), median U-turn (MUT), and Continuous Green-T. The team prepared concepts for the recommended improvements at each intersection and along the corridor. Concepts with innovative solutions included: — SPUI at Livingston Road — CFI at Strand Boulevard and Juliet Boulevard Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-1 Continued: Bill Gramer, PE, AICP — DDI at the 1-75 interchange — CFI and SPUI at Logan Boulevard • Project Manager. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design, Collier County, FL. Bill is managing the design of a new 7-mile, six -lane roadway from Collier Boulevard to 16th St. NE. Providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic (MOT), structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. • Project Manager. Collier-Immokalee Intersection Improvements Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed intersection improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard Intersection, which will provide additional capacity to the intersection and extend Collier Boulevard north by about a half mile. The intersection improvements were planned and designed to accommodate a future SPUI at this intersection. Services included roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, canal relocation, pre -fabricated bridge crossing of canal, box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design, coordination with FPL for relocation of transmission and distribution lines, and permitting. • Project Manager. Tree Farm Road Phase II Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed the design for the half -mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This two-lane roadway section links four roadways with a new roundabout. Design included a new two-lane new roadway with sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes, and a new roundabout. He managed water main and force main design and permitting. The project used three adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. • Project Manager. Collier Boulevard III — Phase I (Golden Gate Boulevard to Green Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed the widening of 2 miles of the existing four -lane, urban, divided roadway. Managed a multi -firm team providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. • Project Manager. Collier Boulevard III — Phase II (Golden Gate Canal to Green Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed the widening of 2 miles of the existing four - lane, urban, divided roadway. His responsibilities included managing a multi -firm team providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. This project is currently on hold at 60%. • Project Manager/Coordinator. Collier Boulevard II (US 41 to Davis Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Bill coordinated and managed this design project involving roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment from US 41 to Davis Boulevard. Managed preparation of design plans and specifications for widening the existing four -lane roadway to a six - lane facility, including four major intersections. Permits included the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Project Coordinator. Oil Well Road Widening and Reconstruction, Collier County, FL. Bill coordinated design and permitting for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road. The project involved widening a two-lane rural section to a four -lane and -six lane urban section. The project included extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. The permitting included drainage and environmental impacts as well as wildlife crossings for endangered species such as the Florida Panther. Our team prepared a bridge design report and design and plans for three bridge replacements, two box culvert extensions, and miscellaneous structures. Project Manager. Collier Boulevard I (Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) project that involved widening three miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six -lane, urban, divided roadway from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. He led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, MOT, structural design, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Permits included SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP. Project Manager. Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport -Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed the widening of 5.5 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six -lane, urban, divided roadway. The project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. Project Manager. Immokalee Road (Collier Boulevard to 43rd Avenue NE) Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed this design project that involved the 8.1-mile widening of Immokalee Road from two to six lanes. He managed complete roadway design, permitting services, drainage design, wetland mitigation, water and force main design, signal design, roadway lighting, traffic studies, and services during construction. Project Manager. Pine Ridge Road (Airport- Pulling Road to Logan Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Managed this design project involving widening Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes and converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the 1-75 interchange. One unique aspect of the project was the redesign of the northbound on- and off -ramps to accommodate dual left -turn lanes. Project Manager/Coordinator. Webber Street (McIntosh Road to Cattleman Road) Design, Sarasota County, FL. Bill managed and coordinated design for this two-mile, four -lane divided collector roadway including bicycle lanes, a grassed center median with streetscaping, retaining Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-2 Continued: Bill Gramer, PE, AICP walls, a 200-foot bridge (Phillippi Creek), major crossroad culverts, privacy walls for residences, intersection improvements, traffic control devices, a closed storm drain system to serve the roadway, stormwater system to intercept runoff from private properties adjacent to the roadway, pond design compensation for filling within the 100-year flood plain, and facilities for mitigation of environmental and neighborhood impacts. Project Manager. Pine Street (Dearborn St. to US41) Design, Sarasota County, FL. Bill managed new roadway design for as a six -lane divided arterial with a majority of the alignment using a rural section. Led preparation of preliminary and final design drawings, geotechnical investigations, obtaining environmental and drainage permits, traffic signal design, preparation of right -of- way plans, and surveying. The project was developed in stages, with the first 3,000-foot section designed to 100% plans. The project involved extensive wetland mitigation along with mitigation for the Florida Scrub Jay. Transportation Planning Project Experience Project Manager. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, Collier County, FL. Bill managed this project with the Collier MPO to complete the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan update identifying implementable projects through 2045. The update includes developing a land use alternative and socioeconomic data for 2045; analyzing modeling results; recommending alternative projects; developing costs for these projects; refining goals, objectives, policies, and performance measures; evaluating potential projects; developing a Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan; and completing long-range transportation plan (LRTP) documentation. The team initiated a virtual public engagement program to reach out the stakeholders, agency representatives, elected officials, and the community during the update. Project Manager. Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. Bill managed an environmental and engineering study to evaluate potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road in Collier County. The purpose was to develop an east -west corridor to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow and accommodate future travel demand through 2045. He led evaluation of potential improvements to existing Randall Boulevard, Oil Well Road, Desoto Boulevard, and Everglades Boulevard, as well as potential corridors on a new alignment. Bill managed development of alternatives and a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects and the overall cost of each option. The study considered traffic operation improvements including roundabouts, grade -separated overpasses, frontage roadways, access management, and new traffic signal locations for the recommended alternative. The study blended preliminary engineering, environmental impact assessments, public outreach and agency coordination. Managed public involvement, data collection and projections, development of corridor alternatives, development of evaluation methodology and criteria, analysis and ranking of corridor alternatives, and selection of a preferred corridor alternative. Project Coordinator. Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection PD&E Study, Collier County, FL. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1 initiated a PD&E study to evaluate proposed improvements at the intersection of Immokalee Road (County Road [CR] 846) and Randall Boulevard in Collier County. These intersection capacity improvements are needed to accommodate projected future traffic demand. The proposed project will improve future intersection operations and result in enhanced mobility and safety. Intersection improvements will also increase regional transportation network connectivity, reduce crashes, improve operations on existing evacuation routes, and expand multi -modal access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic in the area. The team prepared an initial alternatives technical memorandum to document the need for the project, develop intersection improvement alternatives, and conduct a preliminary comparative evaluation based on engineering constraints, environmental effects, and preliminary cost estimates. Proposed alternatives include at -grade alternatives and grade -separated alternatives to increase the intersection capacity. • Project Manager. Collier Boulevard Alignment Study, Collier County, FL. Bill managed a comprehensive analysis to determine the type, design, and location of proposed future improvements to Collier Boulevard (CR 951) from US 41 to Immokalee Road, approximately 15 miles. The team developed and analyzed various typical sections and roadway geometry and evaluated drainage and utility adjustment requirements, site constraints, and preliminary environmental and ROW requirements for a six -lane urban divided section with bike lanes, sidewalks, and stormwater management facilities. • Project Manager. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. Bill managed a corridor study to investigate the feasibility of extending Vanderbilt Beach Road by approximately 10 miles. The initial objective of the study was to identify existing and future transportation demands along the fast-growing extension corridor. That led to creation of conceptual new alignment alternatives that would potentially relieve existing congestion and accommodate future traffic volumes. He led evaluation of alternatives for their traffic impacts, cost-effectiveness, impacts to area businesses and residents, environmental impacts, and consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Bill managed extensive ROW investigations to determine potential impacts of 15 different corridor alternatives. • Project Manager. Miscellaneous Planning Services, Collier County, FL. Bill led the efforts for a variety of transportation planning and engineering services for the Collier MPO and Collier County Planning Department under Jacobs (then CH2M's) general services contracts spanning from 2004 to the present. Services have included roadway planning and conceptual designs, intersection improvement concept development, grant application preparation, project cost estimate development, and coordination with FDOT 1 for proposed improvements. • Project Manager. Old US 41 Redevelopment Complete Streets Concepts, City of Bonita Springs, FL. Bill managed conceptual roadway and stormwater designs for Old US 41 from Bonita Beach Road to W. Terry Street. Evaluated alternatives for roadway, bike lanes, pathways, sidewalks, access management, and stormwater improvements. The concepts included roundabout designs at Pennsylvania Avenue and W. Terry Street. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-3 Continued: Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Sidewalk/Pathway Project Experience Project Manager. Golden Gate Collector Sidewalks and Sunshine Boulevard Sidewalks and Pedestrian Bridge Local Agency Program (LAP) Projects, Collier County, FL. Bill managed design and final design document preparation for constructing a 6-foot sidewalk on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway. He led County coordination, quantities and engineer's estimate of cost preparation, utility coordination, and post -design services. Design complies with FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards ("Florida Green Book" criteria). Senior Advisor. Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study, Collier MPO, Collier County, FL. Bill advised a study that sought to develop a prioritized list of sidewalk and pedestrian amenity projects to promote and enhance walkability, bicycle use, transit use, and social equity throughout the community. The study used field data collection, community engagement, quantitative and qualitative technical analyses, and best practices to develop and validate prioritized recommendations for a more walkable, safer, and healthier community. When implemented, the recommendations will result in a community where mobility options, safety, social engagement, and a "sense of place" are the foundation of the neighborhood. Project Manager. Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant Application — Immokalee Complete Streets, Collier County Planning, Collier County, FL. Bill managed preparation of a TIGER grant application for the Immokalee Complete Street. He managed preparation of grant application, exhibits, estimates, benefit -cost analysis, and all required documentation. Project was successful and resulted in a $13,132,691 grant. Project Manager. Complete Streets Design -Build Criteria Package for TIGER Grant Application, Lee County MPO, Lee County, FL. Bill managed the conceptual design for the 11 planned projects listed in the Complete Streets Initiative TIGER Grant application. He led preparation of conceptual plans and typical sections that defined project features such as sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes, shoulders; quantities and project estimates; conceptual design; and construction schedule. • Project Manager. Safe Routes to School Grant Application, Collier County, FL. Bill helped the County develop a successful Safe Routes to School Grants for Eden Elementary. Prepared conceptual roadway plans, typical sections location maps, existing condition map, student location map, and proof of ROW and analyzed crash data and traffic data. Evaluated field conditions with representatives from FDOT and Collier County. They received $717,071 through Safe Routes to School Funding under the requirements of the Local Agency Program (LAP). • Project Manager. Safe Routes to School Grant Application, Collier County, FL. Bill helped the County develop a successful Safe Routes to School Grants (Shadowlawn Elementary). Prepared conceptual roadway plans, typical sections location maps, existing condition map, student location map, proof of right-of-way, and analyzed crash data and traffic data. He also evaluated field conditions with representatives from FDOT and Collier County. They received $851,459 through Safe Routes to School Funding under LAP requirements. • Project Manager. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Surveys, Collier County, FL. Bill is managing physical surveys of 363 various County structures located on 127 sites (over 2.1 million square feet). The surveys include a report of findings regarding ADA compliance and a statement of probable construction cost for remediation of any ADA items found out of compliance. Transit Project Experience Project Manager. FTA 5339 Fiscal Year 2015 and 2016 Bus Stop Improvements, FDOT. Florida. Bill managed design and preparation of final design documentation for nine bus stops throughout Collier County. The project ensured all federal guidelines as outlined in the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Transportation Facilities are met per code and added bus shelters for each site. Bus stops meet the latest design standards as detailed in the 2012 Florida Accessibility Code (Florida Building Code, Chapter 11). He managed preparation of itemized quantities and engineer's opinion of probable cost, preparation of bid -form and RFP bid -package, plan quality assurance and quality control (GA/QC), and services during construction. Project Manager. Bus Shelter Planning and Design, Collier County, FL. Bill managed various services related to the planning and design of two new bus shelters for their Collier Area Transit bus system. The work involved assisting the Alternative Transportation Modes staff in developing and evaluating various bus shelter alternatives to improve the existing bus shelters' passenger comfort and convenience (e.g., standing areas, seating, protection from sun and rain, and information). He prepared a bus shelter alternatives technical memorandum and bus shelter amenities survey questionnaire. He also prepared for and attended the Public Transit Ad Hoc Advisory Committee meetings. Project Manager. Bus Shelter Design to Achieve ADA Compliance, Collier County, FL. Bill managed preparation of plans, details, quantities, specifications, cost estimates, and bidding and services during construction for site modifications required to bring 50 bus stops located along the state highway system in Collier County up to ADA compliance. Designed bus stops to meet federal guidelines as outlined in the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Transportation Facilities. Site/Civil Project Experience • Project Coordinator. Gordon River Water Quality Park, Collier County, FL. Bill was directly involved in the creation of this 50-acre constructed treatment wetland and public park. Project involves a rare consortium of government agencies and municipalities thatjoined together to design and build a constructed wetland facility that will provide flood attenuation and stormwater treatment for a two -square -mile urban watershed. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-4 Colleen Ross, PE lik DEPUTY PM/COMMUNITY OUTREACH ( JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Colleen brings 15 years of engineering experience with QUALIFICATIONS nearly 9 years of experience delivering various major MS, Environmental transportation projects. She specializes in project Engineering Sciences, coordination, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) University of Central and PD&E study and compliance, corridor planning, rail Florida, 1995 and transit, and transportation planning studies. Her BS, Environmental primary tasks include report documentation, and she brings Engineering, expertise in data collection of existing and future conditions, University of Central analyses of data, and PD&E/NEPA documentation. Colleen Florida, 1991 is responsible for coordinating with all disciplines during transportation studies to confirm all potential impacts are REGISTRATIONS/ documented and accurate. As Deputy Project Manager, CERTIFICATIONS Colleen will support PM Bill Gramer with managing the Professional project from start to finish, with a focus on quality, schedule, Engineer: Florida and budget. (License #54081) Selected Projects MEMBERSHIPS/ Environmental Lead. Wilson Boulevard Widening AFFILIATIONS Corridor Study, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Member, WTS Central Jacobs conducted a study to evaluate potential roadway Florida Chapter corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard from YEARS OF Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road in northern EXPERIENCE Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated widening 15 Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects, and the overall cost of each option. The project also included the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes and enhancement of existing bus stops. As Environmental Lead, Colleen was responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completing a preliminary engineering report, and coordinating the supporting documents. She also assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project. Deputy PM. Districtwide PD&E Consultant Services, FDOT District 6. Miami, FL. The team provides professional PD&E services with task work orders ranging from collecting data, scoping reports, staff hour estimates and scope development, miscellaneous plan reviews, Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) coordination, and PD&E management support and technical guidance. The general scope of services includes project planning, preliminary engineering, environmental studies, and implementation of the ETDM process. As Deputy PM, Colleen helps manage various work orders including in-house PD&E studies, on -call services, miscellaneous reviews, preparation of Statewide Acceleration Transformation (SWAT) documents, and scoping efforts. Environmental Task Lead. SR 414 Expressway Extension PD&E Study, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX). Orlando, FL. This PD&E study evaluated alternatives within existing ROW for the extension of the SR 414 Expressway from US 441 to SR 434. The project addresses an existing bottleneck between the terminus of the 14 Ultimate Maitland Blvd improvement and the SR 414 John Land Apopka Expressway (approximately 2.3 miles). Solutions include adding four elevated tolled lanes to SR 414 to accommodate through trips while maintaining the existing four lanes on the SR 414 (owned and operated by FDOT) and providing multimodal improvements. As Environmental Task Lead, Colleen was responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completing the Project Environmental Impact Report (PEIR), coordinating supporting environmental documents (e.g., Natural Resources Evaluation [NRE] report, Sociocultural Effects Evaluation [SCE] report). Assisted in writing the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER). Challenges included an aggressive schedule, highly constrained corridor, and dual agency coordination. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-5 Continued: Colleen Ross, PE Environmental Task Lead. Colonial Parkway PD&E Study, FOOT and Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (FTE). Orlando, FL. This PD&E study evaluated alternative improvements for the widening of a seven -mile segment of SR 50/East Colonial Drive between Woodbury Road and SR 520 and the inclusion of limited access general toll lanes within the corridor. Project included a major east -west arterial serving central Florida that is heavily impacted by population growth and tourism. Solutions included widening existing SR 50 up to six lanes for local trips and adding four tolled lanes within the SR 50 R/W to accommodate through trips and aid in emergency evacuation. As Environmental Task Lead, Colleen evaluated social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various improvement alternatives; completed the State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), and coordinated supporting environmental documents (e.g., NRE and SCE reports). She acted as the project safety coordinator and helped develop the project Health and Safety Plan. Challenges included impacts to multiple businesses including potential relocations, an aggressive schedule, and a highly constrained corridor. Project Coordinator. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Update, Collier MPO. Collier County, FL. Developed a 2045 LRTP pursuant to federal guidelines by December 2020. The purpose of this plan update is to advance a 20-year planning horizon and to adopt a cost -feasible plan that encourages and promotes a safe and efficient, multi -modal transportation system that addresses the future year transportation demands. Results of the LRTP process are intended to serve the overall mobility needs of the area while also being cost-effective and consistent with national, state, and local goals and objectives. As Project Coordinator, Colleen was responsible for coordinating the development of LRTP document, assisting with development of supporting documents for the LRTP, coordinating with subconsultants on schedule and needs, and coordinating subconsultant contracts. Challenges included reconciling two different socioeconomic data: University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research as required by FDOT District One and the County Interactive Growth Model as a separate analysis for Collier MPO, and incorporating two new target performance measures for all LRTP Updates: Automated Connected Electric Vehicle Shared (ACES) and Resiliency. Environmental Lead. Immokalee Rd (CR 846) at Randall Blvd Intersection PD&E Study, FOOT District One. Collier County, FL. This PD&E study included evaluation of alternative improvements for the widening of the intersection at Immokalee Boulevard and Randall Boulevard and widening Randall Boulevard from two to four lanes. Project includes a major east -west arterial with a connection to 1-75 in unincorporated Collier County. Solutions included an interim at -grade widening as well as an ultimate grade -separated (flyover) at the intersection. As Environmental Lead, Colleen was responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various improvement alternatives, completing the Type 2 Categorical Exclusion in the FDOT SWEPT Tool, coordination of supporting environmental documents (i.e., NRE, Noise Study, and Level 1 Contamination Screening Evaluation Reports), and assisted in the documentation of the Locations Hydraulic Report and the Pond Siting Report. She acted as the project safety coordinator and assisted in development of the project Health and Safety Plan. Assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project including the meeting summary reports. Challenges included panther habitat in the study area and two project holds by FDOT which required scope clarifications due to changes in the PD&E Manual during the project delays. Environmental Lead. Downtown Lakeland Pedestrian Crossings PD&E Study, FOOT District One. Lakeland (Polk County), FL. This PD&E study evaluated bicycle and pedestrian crossings at the intersections of the CSX Railroad with Kentucky Avenue and New York Avenue (approximately four blocks apart). Solutions included grade -separated concepts (bridges over CSX right-of-way) to enhance bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, access, and mobility. As Environmental Lead, Colleen evaluated social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various improvement alternatives, completed the Non -Major State Action document, and coordinated supporting environmental documents. Assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project including the meeting summary reports. Challenges included coordinating with CSX Transportation for a permit to enter the CSX Railroad Right of Way for survey needs, coordination with City of Lakeland for access to City property for geotechnical investigation, and coordination with the City of Lakeland on vision and concepts for the crossings. Environmental Lead. Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. This study evaluated potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road in northern Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated potential improvements to existing roadway facilities as well as potential corridors on a new alignment. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects and the overall cost of each option. As Environmental Lead, Colleen was responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completion of a Corridor Study Report, and coordination of the supporting documents. She assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project and coordinated with multiple subconsultants. Challenges included panther habitat in the study area and documentation of rapidly changing approved development in the area. Environmental Coordinator.)-4/Poinciana Parkway Connector PD&E Study, FOOT District 5.Osceola and Polk Counties, FL. This project involves alternate corridor evaluation report (ACER) preparation, public involvement and agency coordination, environmental documentation, and various management duties in anticipation of an Environmental Impact Statement. The study evaluates an enhanced connection from the northern terminus of the Poinciana Parkway at US 17/92 and C.R. 54 to Interstate 4 or the Central Polk Parkway, approximately four to six miles in length. Colleen helped evaluate social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives. The US Fish and Wildlife Service ETDM Coordinator stated that they were putting the project in dispute, which required additional coordination. • Environmental Lead. Osceola Parkway Extension Concept, Feasibility, and Mobility Study; Central Florida Expressway Authority. Osceola County, FL. This study evaluated extending Osceola Parkway eastward to the Northeast Connector Expressway to provide additional Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-6 Continued: Colleen Ross, PE east -west capacity between SR 417 and US 192 along the Orange and Osceola County line to relieve congestion on both roadways and on the surrounding local roadway network. Specifically, the study evaluated current and future transportation demands, developed and evaluated a range of mobility options, and analyzed feasible alignments that could then be carried forward to a PD&E study. Colleen was the Environmental Lead responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various mobility options; preparing a Concept, Feasibility and Mobility Study Report; and coordinating supporting documents and disciplines. She assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project and coordinated with multiple subconsultants. Challenges included avoidance of minimization of FWC-managed land and intense public opposition to the project. Environmental Task Coordinator. Florida's Turnpike (HEFT/SR 821) Interchange at NW 17Oth Street PD&E Study, Private Client. Miami -Dade County, FL. This PD&E study evaluated alternatives including No Build and a DDI concept for a new interchange at NW 170th Street on Florida's Turnpike (HEFT/SR 821). Solutions included a new DDI on HEFT/SR 821, a new six -lane NW 170th Street with bike lanes and sidewalks, a new roadway drainage system, and relocation of the Golden Glades Canal. As Environmental Task Coordinator, Colleen assisted in evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements; prepared a SEIR document; and coordinated of the supporting environmental documents. She assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project including the meeting summary reports. Colleen acted as the project safety coordinator and helped develop the project Health and Safety Plan. Challenges included determining the project effects while the design and PD&E study re-evaluation of the HEFT/SR 821 widening at this location was ongoing concurrently. Project Coordinator. Southeast Regional Rail Plan Study, Southeast Region US, Federal Railroad Administration. Washington, DC. This was a multi -state network planning study for high-performance rail in the southeastern US. Led by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) in partnership with stakeholders from across the region, the study presents a long-term vision for intercity passenger rail in the region. The study examined the potential for high- performance rail to create a framework for developing intercity passenger rail connections over the next 40 years. As Project Coordinator, Colleen was responsible for drafting the Stakeholder Engagement Plan to coordinate multiple state leaders, including planning organizations and Departments of Transportation leaders in the southeast as well as national stakeholders such as Amtrak; helping draft the Baseline Conditions and Market Assessment Report of the Megaregions and Core Based Statistical Areas within the study area; and assisting with coordination, preparation of materials, and drafting meeting summaries for five stakeholder workshops in various cities across the southeastern US. Challenges included the introduction of CONNECT, a new FRA sketch planning tool that estimates ridership, revenue, cost, and other performance indicators of high-performance rail corridors in a regional network; coordinating with various state DOT planning leads on stakeholder workshop locations and needs; developing workshop strategies to engage stakeholders on their state needs; and a limited budget. • *Client Manager. Miller Enterprises, Inc. Crescent City, FL. Miller Enterprises, Inc. owned and operated over 115 Handy Way Convenience Stores throughout Central and North Florida, many of which have gasoline retail facilities. Colleen oversaw activities at each of the active cleanup sites and communicated necessary information to Miller on cleanup progress and status. • *Remediation Engineer. Chevron #52202 Remedial Action, FDEP. Longwood, Seminole County, FL. This was a remedial action modification to upgrade a pump -and -treat system to an in -situ air sparging/soil vapor extraction system for petroleum contamination. As Remediation Engineer, Colleen drafted the Remedial Action Plan and was the oversight engineer during construction activities. She contracted the operation activities of the site with FDEP to operate this system under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Pay for Performance program. • *Remediation Engineer. Handy Way #2817 Remedial Action, FDEP. Orlando, Orange County, FL. This was a remedial action of petroleum contamination. Activities included conducting an in -situ air sparging pilot study and implementing this data to a full-scale system design. Design specifications included compressor selection, soil vapor extraction, filter pack design, and well screen selection. As Remediation Engineer, Colleen drafted the Remedial Action Plan and was the oversight engineer during construction activities. Petroleum contamination levels were reduced by over 90% during the first year of operation. • *Remediation Engineer. City of Winter Park Garage Remedial Action, FDEP. Winter Park, Orange County, FL. This was a remedial action modification to upgrade a pump -and -treat system to an in -situ air sparging and soil vapor extraction system for petroleum contamination (both gasoline and diesel fuels). Colleen helped draft the Remedial Action Plan and was the oversight engineer during construction activities. Activities included conducting an in -situ air sparging pilot study and implementing this data to a full-scale system design. • *Remediation Engineer. Handy Way #1064 Remedial Action, DeLand, FDEP. Volusia County, FL. This was a remedial action of petroleum contamination. As Remediation Engineer, Colleen was responsible for engineering design specifications, including writing a proposal to conduct a bioremediation pilot study and conduct additional site assessment. • *Remediation Engineer. Handy Way #3331 Remedial Action, FDEP. Silver Springs, Marion County, FL. This remedial action for petroleum contamination included the dual -phase extraction. Colleen authored the Remedial Action Plan including remediation engineering design and specifications. Specifications included pump selection (dual -phase extraction), total dynamic head calculations, filter pack design, and well screen selection; soil vapor extraction; diffused aeration; vapor phase carbon usage rates; and ambient air quality impact analyses. • *Remediation Engineer. Dodge's Store Remedial Action, FDEP, Winter Garden, Orange County, FL. This was a remedial action for petroleum contamination and included the dual -phase extraction. As Remediation Engineer, Colleen authored the Remedial Action Plan including remediation engineering design and specifications. Engineering design specifications included pump selection (dual -phase extraction), total dynamic head calculations, filter pack design, and well screen selection; soil vapor extraction; diffused aeration; vapor phase carbon usage rates; and ambient air quality impact analyses. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-7 Continued: Colleen Ross, PE *Remediation Engineer. MacDill Air Force Base Remedial Action, USACE. Tampa, FL. This project involved pilot testing of an in -situ air sparging and soil vapor extraction to treat petroleum contaminated soils and groundwater. As Remediation Engineer, Colleen was involved in the operation of a 72-hour in -situ air sparging pilot test and soil vapor extraction pilot test. She helped develop the Pilot Test Report, which included a summary of the pilot test data and recommendations for remedial action. • *Remediation Engineer. Westinghouse Nuclear Plant Remedial Action, USACE. Columbia, SC. This project involved pilot testing of an in -situ air sparging and soil vapor extraction to treat soils and groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents. As Remediation Engineer, Colleen was involved in the operation of a 24-hour in -situ air sparging pilot test and soil vapor extraction pilot test. *Experience completed with another firm. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-8 Ken Wooten, PE QA/QC — ROADWAY (JACOBS ) ilk EDUCATION/ Ken has 24 years of roadway design and project QUALIFICATIONS management experience on multidisciplinary design BS, Environmental projects and PD&E studies. He specializes in roadway design Engineering, and planning for highway facilities, including interstate University of Florida, highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and 1997 urban and rural arterial roads. Ken brings comprehensive experience on transportation projects throughout Florida for REGISTRATIONS/ FOOT and other clients, including Collier County. He led the CERTIFICATIONS roadway design for Collier County's Oil Well Road project. Professional Ken's previous experience with Collier County and specific Engineer: Florida expertise in FDOT plan production requirements, including (License #58817) quantities, specifications, and electronic delivery, will add YEARS OF tremendous value to his role leading QA/QC for this project. EXPERIENCE Selected Projects 24 • Quality Manager. Carillon Intersection Improvements, City of St. Petersburg, FL. The project involved the development of proposed intersection alternatives at two intersections in St. Petersburg. The preferred alternatives included a roundabout at the intersection of Carillon Parkway with Tower Place and Echelon City Center and a signalized intersection at the intersection of Fountain Parkway with Echelon City Center and Baycreek Lane. In Phase 2, the team prepared design for the preferred alternatives. Roundabout design analyses included fastest path and design vehicle simulation. • Quality Manager. SR 655/Recker Highway Construct a Bridge Spanning CSX RR Track in Polk County, FDOT District 1, FL. Ken was Quality Manager for a grade separation project to replace the existing CSX at -grade railroad crossing at SR 655/Recker Highway. Potential conflicts and crash potential will be eliminated with an overpass over the railroad for SR 655/Recker Highway and adjacent cross -streets. The proposed bridge will span from CSX ROW line to CSX ROW line and requires CSX coordination and approval. Improvements to US 92 include reconstruction of the SR 655/Recker Highway/US 92 intersection with high polymer asphalt pavement and milling and resurfacing to the east to Kelly Lane, where a U-turn movement is to be installed to mitigate driveway closures along SR 655/ Recker Highway, north of the CSX railroad crossing. Thornhill Road will be realigned to accommodate the grade separation along SR 655/Recker Highway. Quality Manager. SR 580/West Busch Boulevard Corridor Study, FDOT District 7. Hillsborough County, FL. This was a corridor study for West Busch Boulevard (SR 580) from North Dale Mabry Highway to North Nebraska Avenue in Hillsborough County. The outcome of the study will be a Corridor Alternatives and Strategies Report outlining the vision for short-term and long-term improvements within the corridor to meet the mobility and connectivity needs of all users, regardless of their transportation mode of choice. Ken reviewed all documents for conformance with the project Quality Management Plan. Quality Manager. SR 580/West Busch Boulevard Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation (RRR), FDOT District 7. Tampa, FL. Jacobs is providing RRR design services for 1.3 miles of SR West Busch Boulevard (SR 580) from east of Armenia Avenue to west of Florida Avenue. Ken serves as Quality Manager and reviews all documents for conformance with the project Quality Management Plan. QC Reviewer. Beachline East (SR 528) Expressway PD&E Study, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise. Orange and Brevard Counties, FL. This PD&E Study evaluated the proposed Beachline widening to eight lanes from SR 520 to SR 524 (Industry Road). The PD&E Study includes overlapping design (milling and resurfacing) for critical roadway segments, feasibility evaluation of a potential service plaza, multimodal accommodations for rail and transit facilities, and extensive environmental resources within the study area. As QC Reviewer, Ken was responsible for reviewing the engineering documents and concept plans. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-9 Continued: Ken Wooten, PE Technical Resource/Roadway/MOT. Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) and FOOT District 5.Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. This was a design project for a new 25-mile section of the Wekiva Parkway for CFX and FOOT. Jacobs managed six design teams in the delivery of five roadway and three toll facility projects with a constructed value of $550M and provided comprehensive reviews of all necessary design submittals for CFX. Jacobs provided contractual support services for negotiations and contract administration, ensuring all contracts were audit -compliant for CFX, and helped CFX with the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan application process through the Federal Highway Administration through final loan approval. We coordinated with the public involvement consultant and the CFX public involvement officer. Jacobs also provided technical reviews and environmental compliance for the design of the FDOT's nine design sections required as part of the Wekiva Parkway corridor. Ken provided technical reviews on roadway and MOT plans. Project Manager. US 41/SR 45/Broad Street Improvements, FDOT District 7. Hernando County, FL. This project involved the milling and resurfacing of the asphalt pavement and correcting cross slope to meet current design criteria for 4.76 miles of roadway. The existing typical section is a two-lane rural section with deficient cross slope and vertical curves. Project also includes correcting super -elevation rate and super -elevation transitions, developing two separate pavement designs to account for varying cracking and rutting depths, replacing existing cracked concrete ditch pavement, designing signing and pavement marking upgrades to improve the safety at the intersection of US 41 and CR 481/Snow Memorial Highway, and processing design variations for deficient design features. Project Manager. Harney Road and Williams Road Intersection Improvements Design, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil Contract. Hillsborough County, FL. Ken managed a wide range of engineering services for this intersection safety improvements design project. The primary improvements included new traffic signals with the incorporation of pedestrian facilities and bicycle lanes within the project limits. Ken managed the project involved design for the relocation of two Hillsborough County force mains and coordination with multiple private utilities. Project Manager. Himes Avenue and Kirby Street Intersection Improvements Design, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil Contract. Hillsborough County, FL. This project included milling and resurfacing of existing pavement, widening for the turn lane, adding paved shoulders, adding sidewalks, drainage improvements, permitting, utility coordination, and surveying and mapping. Ken managed this design project, which added a southbound left turn lane on a two-lane rural facility. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-10 Velvet Bridges, PE, MSCE QA/QC — STRUCTURES ( JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Velvet has 33 years of experience providing concrete bridge QUALIFICATIONS design, ship impact, structural modeling, and quality MS, Civil Engineering, control. Her experience includes preparing preliminary and University of South final design of major concrete bridge structures, including Florida, 1991 grade separations and water crossing, post -tensioned BS, Civil Engineering, segmental concrete, and long -span cable -stayed types. University of South Velvet has substantial experience providing services in Florida, 1989 projects' construction phases, including inspection, load rating, and rehabilitation of new and existing bridges. REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Selected Projects Professional EOR. 1-4 Ultimate Improvement Project, FDOT District Engineer: FL 5 (Design Builder SGL Constructors Design Build Joint (#52061); AZ Venture). Orange County, FL. Velvet prepared design of (#33653); OH a curved arch steel cable pedestrian bridge over 1-4 at (#73384); CA Maitland Boulevard. 1-4 is often called the backbone of (#77494); MN Florida transportation system. The bridge is situated over (#48751); GA ten lanes of 1-4 as well as seven lanes of off/on ramps. (#46992); PR The simple span bridge is 600 feet long with a 12-foot- (#28464); TN wide deck curved in -plan. The steel arch rib is 708 feet (#126487) long. This design -built project is based on LRFD. Structural Engineer: EOR. Miami Intermodal Center-Earlington Heights UT (3083617-2202) Guideway Structures (MIC-EHT), Miami Dade Transit. Dade County, FL. Velvet served as FOR for the final design YEARS OF of 13 segmental box girder bridges by balanced cantilever EXPERIENCE method of construction. The MIC-EHT connector consists 33 of a 2.4-mile extension to the elevated, heavy -rail Metrorail line from Earlington Heights Station at NW 22nd Avenue and NW 41 st Street to the Miami Intermodal Center near Miami International Airport. This $230M extension has numerous challenges involving long -span segmental concrete box girder design over the Miami River, an active tri-rail freight corridor, and a major expressway (SR112). The project included a four -level station integrated with a bus terminal plaza and a pedestrian overpass which connects the station to the airport's rental car facility and automated people mover station. The design -bid project was based on LRFD. • EOR. SR408/SR417 Ultimate Interchange Improvements (Project 253F), Orlando - Orange County Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL. Velvet served as FOR for the final design of three curved precast spliced U-Beam Flyover Ramps (maximum span of 200'-0"). This type of structure has been successfully used in other states but is new to Florida. The method of construction consists of temporary supports at the splice sections using post -tensioning. The design -bid project was based on LRFD. • Lead Design Engineer. SR 826/SR 836 (Palmetto Expressway/Dolphin Expressway) Interchange, FDOT District 6. Miami -Dade County, FL. The SR 826/SR 836 Interchange is the second largest highway project in Florida. It is a four -level interchange in the heart of Miami -Dade County adjacent to the Miami International Airport. The project includes reconstruction of two miles of SR 826 and three miles of SR 836 to provide five lanes in each direction. The project also includes the introduction of roads along SR 836 and construction of 51 bridges, including eight segmental bridges. Velvet prepared final design of three precast segmental box girder highway bridges (maximum span of 240 feet). The design assumed a balanced cantilever method of erection. This design -bid project was based on LRFD. • Design Engineer. Thomas B. Manuel Bridge, FDOT Turnpike Authority. Martin County, FL. Velvet designed the superstructure of a multi -span precast/prestressed Florida Bulb-T 78 Beam northbound bridge addition over the St. Lucie Canal. This design -build project was based on LRFD. • Design Engineer. SR 55 (US 19) over Countryside Blvd. and SR 55 (US 19) over SR 580, FDOT District 7. Pinellas County, FL. Velvet was responsible for the independent design of the cast -in -place multi cell box girders. She performed the load rating analysis of both bridges using FDOT's established procedure. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-11 Continued: Velvet Bridges, PE Design Engineer. Acosta Main River Bridge, FDOT District 2. Duval County, FL. Velvet performed the calculations necessary for a required crane permit for the Jacksonville Express Skyway system. She determined the maximum allowable crane loads in the bridge by performing a longitudinal and transverse analysis of a five -span cast -in -place concrete box girder erected in balanced cantilever with a 630-foot main span and cast -in -place concrete box girder approaches erected on falsework. This entailed structural loading to carry light rail transit. Design Engineer. Old Sunshine Skyway Bridge over Tampa Bay, FOOT District 7. Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties, FL. Velvet prepared design to upgrade the northbound and southbound approach spans of the existing bridge concrete deck for recreational fishing piers. • Independent Technical Peer Review. Interchange Plan Review, Orlando -Orange County Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL. Velvet conducted the independent technical peer review of a co -consultant's design (Parsons & BS) of curved precast spliced U-beam flyover ramps for the SR 417 Boggy Creek Road Interchange. The design -build project was based on LRFD. • Construction Shop Drawings Reviewer. Miami Intermodal Center-Earlington Heights Guideway Structures, Miami Dade Transit. Dade County, FL. Velvet provided construction support, including reviewing shop drawing and assisting the contractor during construction of the pre -cast segmental box girder segments by balanced cantilever method. This design -bid project was based on LRFD. Independent Technical Peer Reviewer. SR 826/SR 836 (Palmetto Expressway/Dolphin Expressway) Interchange, FDOT District 6. Dade County, FL. Velvet provided construction support through shop drawing reviews and independent peer review of the pre -cast segmental box girder box girder segments by balanced cantilever method of construction. This design - build project was based on LRFD. Independent Technical Peer Reviewer. Major Structures Plan Review, FDOT Districts 2 and D4. St. Johns, Broward and Volusia Counties, FL. Velvet was responsible for the independent design review of segmental alternates for the Hallandale Beach Blvd; Broward County and Broadway Bridge; Volusia County, Florida. The method of construction consisted of span -by - span erection. Under the same contract an independent design review was performed for the SR-312 Bridge over Matanzas River; St. Johns County, Florida. Independent Technical Peer Reviewer. Major Structures Plan Review, FDOT Districts 4, 5 and 6. Martin, Volusia and Dade County, FL. Velvet was responsible for the independent design review of segmental alternates for the Mac Arthur Causeway Bridge; Dade County, Roosevelt Boulevard Bridge Replacement, Martin County and Seabreeze Bridge; Volusia County, Florida. The method of construction consisted of balanced cantilever erection over intercoastal waterway. Under the same contract an independent ship impact study was performed for the Merrill Barber Bridge. • Bridge Inspection. Evaluation of Existing Bridges, FDOT Districts 4 and 5. Broward, Palm Beach and Osceola Counties, FL. Velvet was responsible for the production Bridge Rating Reports for concrete bridges after performing bridge inspection evaluations. • Bridge Research. Epoxy Coated Rebar Study, Key West Bridges. FDOT District 6. Monroe County, FL. Velvet was responsible for the evaluation of Corrosion of Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete Key West Bridges. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-12 Danh Lee, PE QA/QC - DRAINAGE/PERMITTING ( JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Danh has over 20 years of experience preparing QUALIFICATIONS transportation and drainage design and developing BSCE, Civil plans for major and minor roadways, expressways, Engineering, and interstate highways, including major multi -level University of Central interchanges. His project experience includes planning, Florida preliminary design, and final design, including stormwater management and environmental permitting education. REGISTRATIONS/ His permitting experience includes procuring surface CERTIFICATIONS water and environmental permits from St. Johns River Professional Water Management District, SFWMD, Southwest Florida Engineer: Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), FDEP, USACE, and (#68228) EPA. Danh brings in-depth knowledge of drainage needs FDOT, LRE Certified and considerations along the project corridor from his FDOT, CES Certified experience serving as the Drainage QC Lead for the Pond Siting Report portion of the Wilson Boulevard YEARS OF Corridor Study. EXPERIENCE Selected Projects 20 Drainage QC Lead. Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Jacobs conducted a study to evaluate potential roadway corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road in northern Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects, and the overall cost of each option. The project also included the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes and bus stop enhancements. Danh served as Drainage QC Lead for the Pond Siting Report. Drainage Engineer. I-4/SR 408 Interim Interchange, Central Florida Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL. Danh designed the storm sewer pipe network system and prepared the Storm Water Pollution Prevention plan. The interchange improvements will widen 1-4 and SR 408 from six to eight lanes and redesign the existing facility to a four -level interchange. This project represents a joint undertaking between the Orlando -Orange CFX and FOOT District 5. Drainage Engineer.1-75 Widening, FDOT District 5. Sumter County, FL. This project involved preparing final design and construction documents for widening 1-75 from south of CR 470 to south of Florida's Turnpike. The project scope was limited to developing 60% plans and supporting documents to a stage far enough to identify ROW requirements, prepare final ROW maps, and obtain environmental permits. This project also includes analysis of a single -point interchange at CR 470. Senior Drainage Engineer. SR 40 Improvements, FDOT District 5. Marion County, FL. This project included improvements to SR 40 at three locations. Location A was the 1-75 Interchange, Location B was the SW 27th Avenue Intersection, and Location C was NW 52nd Avenue to East of 1-75. Location A involves widening SR 40 to provide for two left -turn lanes onto the northbound and southbound 1-75 on -ramps, including widening these ramps. Location B involves improvements to the intersection to provide dual left -turn lanes in all directions. Location C involves milling and resurfacing SR 40 and adding sidewalk and dedicated bike lanes on both sides. The scope of services for all three locations also involves signing and pavement marking, signalization, environmental permitting, geotechnical investigation, and design survey. Locations A and B also involved lighting and ROW mapping. Drainage Engineer. General Consultant, FDOT District 5. FL. Danh conducted a drainage plan review during this contract to assist FDOT with the final design review to implement the design/build/maintain contract for the 61-mile commuter rail transit project, SunRail project, which will run from DeLand to Poinciana in Central Florida. Danh reviewed final drainage design plans for the track corridor and all stations including all site civil design reviews for 12 commuter rail stations, including 6 with park -and -ride and similar facilities. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-13 Continued: Danh Lee, PE Lead Drainage Engineer. SR 50 from Sumter/Lake County Line to CR 33, FOOT District 5. Lake County, FL. As Lead Drainage Engineer, Danh prepared drainage design for both primary and secondary systems and permitting for the SR 50 widening project. This project consisted of reconstruction of 4 miles of a two-lane major arterial roadway to a four -lane divided roadway. About half the project length is rural with a 65 mph design speed and the other half is urban with a 45 mph design speed. The project includes a roundabout at Tuscanooga Road, relocation of the CR 33 intersection, a shared use path, and an emergency access only signalized intersection. Lead Drainage Engineer. SR 408 and SR 417 Ultimate Interchange Improvements, Central Florida Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL. As Lead Drainage Engineer, Danh prepared drainage design of both primary and secondary systems for the SR 408 and SR 417 Interchange. The project included interchange movements to and from SR 417 south of the interchange and improvements to SR 417 extending south over Econlockhatchee Trail and Lake Underhill Road. The interchange includes five new ramp structures, two of which are high-level multiple -span curved structures using prestressed concrete U beams —one of the first of this beam type used in Florida. Senior Drainage Engineer. SR 528 Widening, FOOT District S. Brevard County, FL. This project included development of final design and preparation of construction documents, permits, and specifications for the five -mile SR 528 widening from east of SR 3 to Port Canaveral Interchange. As Senior Drainage Engineer, Danh prepared drainage design and specifications. This project will add one express lane in each direction separated by a four -foot buffer from the general use lanes and a 12-foot multi -use trail along the north side of SR 528. This project involves three interchanges at Banana River Drive, SR 401, and George King Boulevard and replacement of five twin bridges at Sykes Creek, Banana River Drive, Banana River Relief, Banana River, and SR 401. Drainage Engineer. SR 429 Wekiva Parkway Section 7A, FOOT District 5. Seminole, FL. Danh developed stormwater pond design, cross drain design, ditch design, and special gutter profiles to complete SR 429 Wekiva Parkway corridor and interchange. The design for this project includes design and preparation of final construction plans and permits for approximately 3.5 miles of an Urban Expressway (SR 429 Wekiva Parkway) with adjacent frontage roads, from east of River Oaks Circle to Orange Blvd (CR 431) in Seminole County. This project involves five roundabouts and seven bridges. Lead Drainage Engineer. Viera Interchange PD&E Study, FDOT Dristrict 5. Brevard County, FL. This was a PD&E study for Viera Boulevard, a two- and four -lane arterial from Power Line Road to US 1, including a four -lane overpass of 1-95. Brevard County built the overpass in 2007 as the first phase of a new interchange with 1-95. As part of the Viera DRI, FDOT recognized the potential for increased traffic congestion at the Fiske Boulevard interchange to the north and the Wickham Road interchange to the south, as well as on Fiske Boulevard. This led to a proportionate share agreement with FDOT in which The Viera Company (TVC) is committed to funding the PD&E Study, final design, and permitting and construction phases of the project. As a funding partner and primary landowner, TVC is a major project stakeholder, requiring an additional level of coordination. Services provided on this contract include preliminary engineering, constructability and MOT, cost estimates, traffic operations, interchange concepts, structural, drainage, floodplains, geotechnical, threatened and endangered species, wetlands, and public involvement. Drainage Designer. 1-4 Ultimate Design, Section 4, FOOT District 5. Orange County, FL. Danh designed the storm sewer pipe network system for the final design of 1-4 from south of Orange Blossom Trail to south of Ivanhoe Boulevard. This reconstruction project improves four miles of 1-4 to six general use lanes and four HOV express lanes. The project also includes roadway improvements along two miles of SR 408. The project has major interchanges along 1-4 at OBT, Kaley and Michigan, SR 408, and SR 50. SR 408 and 1-4 is a complex four -level interchange with extensive ramp reconstruction. Senior Drainage Engineer. SR 869/Sawgrass Expressway (from N of Atlantic Blvd. to SR 7) Widening from 6 to 10 lanes, Reconstruct/Rehabilitate interchanges at Sample Rd., Coral Ridge Dr. & University Dr., FTE. Broward County, FL. This project includes roadway widening, modification of the stormwater management systems, signing, structures, ITS, and lighting. Danh is responsible for both primary and secondary drainage design, including Sample Road and University Drive. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-14 Eric Bridges, PE ROADWAY DESIGN/SINGING, MARKING AND CHANNELIZATION (JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Eric brings over nine years of roadway and highway QUALIFICATIONS geometric design experience, including plans production, BS, Civil Engineering, quantity estimates, analyzing design criteria, and Florida State geographic information system (GIS) mapping for Crash University, 2016 Analysis Reporting Systems (CARS). He's proficient in AutoCAD, MicroStation, FOOT SS10, FOOT OpenRoads REGISTRATIONS/ Designer (ORD), corridor and 3D modeling, drainage CERTIFICATIONS software ASAD, and A032, a simulation tool for designing Professional lighting projects. He's skilled at verifying compliance Engineer: Florida with FDOT and American Association of State Highway (89649) and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards and YEARS OF specifications. EXPERIENCE Selected Projects 9 • 3D Modeling Lead. Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport - Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard) Design, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Jacobs is currently managing the widening of 5.5 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six -lane, urban divided roadway, including addressing public concerns about access, circulation, traffic demands, businesses and residential impacts, and aesthetics. Eric led 3D roadway corridor modeling. • 3D Modeling Lead. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Jacobs managed design of a new 7-mile, six -lane roadway from Collier Boulevard to 16th St. NE, including leading public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Eric led 3D roadway corridor modeling. • Project Manager and Engineer of Record (EOR). SR 804/E Ocean Avenue from SR S/US 1 to SR Al A/N Ocean Boulevard, FDOT District 4. Palm Beach County, Florida. Eric is the project manager and FOR on this project for roadway and signing and pavement marking (S&PM). The intent of this project is to mill and resurface SR 804 and E Ocean Avenue from SR 5 and US 1 to SR Al and N Ocean Boulevard. The project involves reconstructing curb ramps, sidewalk, S&PM, relocating pedestrian push button due to being out of FOOT compliance, and replacing signal loops damaged from milling operations. This project is in the initial engineering stages. • EOR. SR-806/Atlantic Avenue from west SR 7/US 441 to East of Lyons Road, FDOT District 4. Palm Beach County, FL. The completed highway improvements include reconstructing the existing two-lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided roadway while maintaining availability for the ultimate six -lane section. Eric created a 3D modeled corridor, aiding in design decisions, Computer -Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) production and preparing plans for submittal. • Lead Project Engineer. Recker Highway at CSX (Railroad Overpass), FDOT D1. Polk County, FL. As Lead Project Engineer, Eric prepared roadway design in ORD for the Recker Highway at CSX railroad overpass to relieve traffic congestion and delay, especially for truck traffic, and improve safety. The project will provide an unimpeded direct link from US 92 to Recker Highway near Thornhill Road, eliminating the significant delay for trucks and automobiles during train crossing events. Eric led 3D model development, horizontal and vertical geometry design, super -elevation and reverse crown transitions design, geometric and grading design of intersecting side streets and driveways including establishing required construction easements and ROW takes based off the 3D model tie -downs, and geometric design of curb and gutter barrier walls along the shared -use path. • Lead Roadway Engineer. SR 826/Palmetto Expressway from East of NW 32nd Ave to West of NW 17th Ave, FDOT District 6. Miami -Dade County, FL. Improvements include reconstruction of the mainline to provide three general purpose lanes and two express lanes with four -foot buffer and express lane marker separation and addition of one auxiliary lane between interchanges in each direction. At the easternmost Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-15 Continued: Eric Bridges, PE project limits, the express lanes will transition from two lanes to one with a connection to the planned direct connect ramp to 1-95 Express at the GGI. Reconstruction of existing pedestrian bridge west of NW 27th Ave and Frontage Road and intersection improvements at NW 27th Avenue and NW 22nd Avenue including a SPUI for NW 27th Avenue. Eric was responsible for preparing roadway design, coordinating with other disciplines, and developing the 3D model. • Lighting and Signing and Pavement Marking Plans Engineer. SR 869 / Sawgrass Expressway (from north of Atlantic Blvd to SR 7), Florida's Turnpike Enterprise. Coral Springs, FL. Eric helped develop roadway lighting and prepare plans for the reconstruction of SR 869 Sawgrass Expressway, including a DDI at Sample Road. • Engineer. US-1 Milling and Resurfacing from Hypoluxo Rd. to Waterway Dr., FDOT D4. Palm Beach County, Florida. Eric helped produce plans for roadway, temporary traffic control plans (TTCP), and S&PM. This project included improvements to sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, signalization, curb return widening, and S&PM. • Engineer. Gateway Blvd and 1-95 Interchange Improvements, FDOT D4. Palm Beach County, Florida. Eric helped produce plans for roadway, TTCP, and S&PM. This project included improvements to pedestrian ramps, pedestrian signalization, traffic • Roadway Engineer. Snake Creek High Level Bridge Feasibility Study, FDOT District 6. Monroe County, FL. Conducted a corridor study along SR 5, US 1, and Overseas Highway near the Snake Creek Bridge analyzing existing conditions, identifying recurring congestion, and evaluating the need for a fixed span bridge based on future travel demand. Eric was involved throughout the study and developed conceptual design plans to identify issues associated with replacing the drawbridge with a fixed span bridge. • Design/CADD. SR 77 — Multilane Reconstruction, FDOT District 3. Chipley, FL. Eric provided design and CADD support for the widening of SR 77 from two to four lanes from north of the entrance of Sunny Hills Boulevard to south of Ben Road. This 4.2-mile segment includes widening reconstruction, ROW requirements, median opening design, drainage work, stormwater retention ponds, and minor utility relocations from the design side. • Design/CADD. SR 8 (1-10) Group 14-07, FDOT D3. Gadsden and Leon Counties, FL. Eric provided design and CADD production. The project included milling and resurfacing two miles of SR 8 from west of SR 10 (US 90) to the Leon County line including the interchange on/off ramps at SR 10 in Gadsden County. Also milling and resurfacing of 1-mile of SR 8 (1-10) from the Gadsden County line to the six -lane section in Leon County. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-16 Randy Mock, PE -` STRUCTURAL DESIGN LEAD ( JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Randy brings over 40 years of experience providing civil QUALIFICATIONS and structural engineering services on transportation BS, Civil Engineering, projects throughout Florida. His background includes University of South expertise in bridges, interchanges, highways, and marine Florida structure design, and he brings best practices and lessons learned from those numerous highway and bridge projects REGISTRATIONS/ throughout Florida. Randy will leverage this comprehensive CERTIFICATIONS engineering experience to deliver high -quality structural Professional design solutions tailored to meet your objectives. Engineer: Florida (License #32015), Selected Projects Georgia EOR. SR 91/Turnpike Widening from Osceola Parkway Certified Bridge to SR 528/Orlando South, Turnpike Enterprise. Orange Inspector County, FL. Randy served as FOR for the replacement of SR 91 over CSX Railroad and Central Florida Parkway. YEARS OF The bridge is single span, 102 linear feet by 154 feet EXPERIENCE wide. Construction consists of cast -in -place deck, Florida 44 1 Beams, cast -in -place substructure, prestressed concrete pile foundations, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls, temporary critical walls, and phased construction. Randy also served as FOR for Wetherbee Pier Protection and quality control for Orange Avenue Bridges over SR 91 and Taft -Vineland Bridges over SR 91. Structural efforts included concept selections, final designs and professional services during construction. • EOR. SR 15 (US 17) Bridge Over Dunns Creek, FDOT District 2. Putman County, FL. Randy served as FOR for final design of this 2,808 linear feet fixed, high- level bridge. The navigable bridge crossing consists of prestressed concrete foundations, cast -in -place substructures, vessel impact resistant water -born piers, Florida I Beams, cast -in -place deck, MSE walls, other walls, and all other ancillary bridge items. He also provided services during construction. Project Manager and EOR. Jones Road Over Six Mile Creek Bridge Replacement, FDOT District 2, Duval County, FL. Randy provided project management, conceptual design, and final design. Construction consists of three -span continuous cast -in -place superstructure, cast -in -place substructure, and prestressed concrete pile foundations. The project also included all ancillary needs, such as concepts, structures, roadway, permitting, public involvement, drainage, MOT, and services during construction. Project Manager and EOR. Bessent Road Bridge Replacement Over West Branch, FOOT District 2, Duval County, FL. Randy was responsible for project management, conceptual design, and final design for the four -span Florida Slab Beam (FSB) bridge replacement. He coordinated with FOOT District 2 and the Central Office with development of the new FSB Developmental Standard and this demonstration project. The project included all ancillary needs, such as concepts, structures, roadway, permitting, public involvement, drainage, MOT, and services during construction. Senior Bridge Engineer and EOR. 1-4 (Memorial Boulevard to U.S. 98) Design/ Build, FDOT District One. Polk County, FL. Structures consisted of four two -span continuous steel plate girder bridges with spans of approximately 252 feet each, one bridge consisting of 158-foot, 78-inch Florida Bulb Tees, MSE walls, top/ down walls, temporary critical walls, and other miscellaneous structures. As Senior Bridge Engineer and EOR, Randy was responsible for leading the bridge design and construction services for the widening of a 3-mile section of 1-4 near Lakeland from four lanes to six lanes. Structural QC. Palm River Boulevard Bridge Replacement Over Palm River Canal, Collier County Growth Management Department. Collier County, FL. The Palm River bridge consists of three -span continuous cast -in -place superstructure, cast -in -place substructure, and prestressed concrete pile foundations. Randy provided QC for concept reports, superstructure, substructure, foundations, plans, calculations, and quantities. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-17 Continued: Randy Mock, PE • Structural QC. Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) Extension over Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal and Orange Tree Canal, Collier County Growth Management Department. Collier County, FL. These three bridges consists of three -span continuous cast -in -place superstructure, cast -in - place substructure, and prestressed concrete pile foundations. QC efforts included concept reports, superstructure, substructure, foundations, plans, calculations, and quantities. Project Manager and EOR. Vilano Bridge Replacement, FOOT District Two. St. Johns County, FL. Randy provided project management and FOR services for the preparation of permit applications, structural design, and professional services during construction for the new SR Al bridge over the Intracoastal Waterway at Vilano Beach. This 3,838-LF fixed, high-level bridge replaced a 1946 vintage vertical lift bridge. Particular features include the following: 150 long spans of continuous post tensioned bulb tee girders; aesthetically treated arch type piers; marine fenders; temporary fenders for special navigation needs during construction; and ship impact resistant piers. This bridge received an ACI award of excellence. Randy worked closely with the US Coast Guard on this project due to unique navigation constraints during construction and channel realignment. • Project Manager and EOR.1-295 from SR 202 to St. Johns Bluff Road, FOOT District Two. Duval County, FL. Randy served as Project Manager, EOR, and designer of a 4.5-mile section of SR 9A from J. T. Butler Boulevard to St. Johns Bluff Road. The bridges consisted of seven dual locations with AASHTO beams, simple span steel plate girders, and continuous steel plate girders. The project also included roadway, permitting, retaining walls, and lighting. • Project Manager. Replacement Bridges, City of Jacksonville. Jacksonville, FL. Randy managed and provided structural engineering services for four replacement bridges of various construction types. All sites included approach roadways, permitting, and retaining walls. • Structural QA Officer. Seminole Expressway/SR 417 Widening, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise. Seminole County, FL. Randy oversaw QA/QC to widen the existing four -lane SR 417 to six lanes in order to accommodate a future eight -lane section. Structural work included preliminary design for the widening of 11 bridges at six locations and the replacement of three bridges at two locations. Construction types included pre -stressed concrete beams, steel plate girders, foundations, temporary and permanent walls, and new piles behind existing MSE walls. Structures QC.1-75 (SR 93) at Florida's Turnpike—Wildwood Interchange (MP 309) Design - Build RFP, Phase 1(30%) Roadway Plans, 45% Drainage and Bridge Concept Reports, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise. Sumter County, FL. Randy provided QC reviews for all the project structural efforts, which included three bridge concept reports, MSE walls, settle issues, and structural portions of the design -build RFP. The bridges consisted of two braided ramps with curved steel plate girders and straddle piers, and one single -span plate girder bridge. • Senior Structural Reviews. Wekiva Parkway (SR 429), CFX Owner's Representative. Orange County, FL. These new sections (202, 203, 204, 205, and 206) of Wekiva Parkway extend from US 441 to CR 46 and contain 40 bridges. Bridge types consisted of Florida I Beams, post -tensioned concrete box girders, steel plate girders, and steel box girders. As Senior Structural Reviewer, Randy reviewed proposals, procurement, concepts, final designs, services during construction, and the cost savings initiative proposals. • Contract Manager, Project Manager, and Design Engineer. Miscellaneous Waterfront Contract, City of Jacksonville. Jacksonville, FL. The Miscellaneous Waterfront Contract was a six -year, task -oriented contract with the City of Jacksonville. All projects were waterfront or marine -related and consisted of needs such as dredging, condition inspections, facility inventory, civil design, bulkheads, and other structural design activities. • Project Manager and Structural Engineer. Northbank Riverwalk Emergency Repairs, City of Jacksonville Public Works Department. Jacksonville, FL. This was a task under the City of Jacksonville Miscellaneous Waterfront Contract. The project consisted of inspection, emergency repairs, and permanent repairs to the failing Coastline Drive Bridge. Randy provided project management, condition inspections, 24-hour site surveillance, design, construction engineering, and other construction services. • Project Manager. Southside Boulevard/Baymeadows Road Intersection Design, Jacksonville Transportation Authority. Jacksonville, FL. Randy provided project management and bridge design services for improvements to this major urban intersection in southeast Jacksonville. The project involved planning and preliminary engineering of alternate interchange configurations, final design, and post -design services. The team also provided MOT, public involvement, utilities, right-of-way administration, and coordination with an ongoing widening of Southside Boulevard. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-18 Angela Shepard, PE DRAINAGE (JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Angela has over 13 years of experience in roadway and QUALIFICATIONS drainage design, including stormwater management BS, Civil Engineering, facilities, culvert, ditch, and storm drain design. Her University of North experience includes working as a drainage engineer Florida on the Pond Siting Report for Collier County's Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, giving her an in-depth REGISTRATIONS/ understanding of local conditions and County goals and CERTIFICATIONS preferences. Professional Engineer: Florida Selected Projects (#74658) Project Drainage Engineer. Wilson Boulevard Widening YEARS OF Corridor Study, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Jacobs EXPERIENCE conducted a study to evaluate potential roadway corridor 13 improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road in northern Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects, and the overall cost of each option. The project also included the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, bike lanes, and bus stop enhancements. As Project Drainage Engineer, Angela was responsible for preparing the Pond Siting Report, which included the identification and evaluation of 18 potential pond sites to accommodate proposed roadway improvements along Wilson Boulevard. • Drainage EOR. CSX Bridge Replacement over 1-4, FDOT District 1. Lakeland, FL. Final design of a new rail bridge over 1-4, which will replace the existing rail bridge (Bridge No. 160173). The existing bridge is a four -span structure that does not accommodate the new 1-4 Ultimate typical section. The new bridge will be constructed adjacent to (to the west of) the existing bridge to accommodate for both the wider 1-4 Ultimate footprint and future double -tracking of the CSX railroad alignment while giving sufficient room for construction and demolition without significant impacts to both the motoring public and the active rail line. The new bridge will consider current interstate highway vertical clearance requirements and plan for additional clearance for the future multimodal envelope in the median of 1-4 and accommodate potential, future high-speed rail. GEC Drainage Support. Wekiva Parkway Section 8 Design -Build RFP and Plans Review, FDOT District 5. Seminole County, FL. As part of the ongoing services provided to FDOT District Five, Angela developed and coordinated with FDOT District Five staff to revise language in FDOT's boilerplate RFP for the Wekiva Parkway Section 8, from Orange Boulevard to east of Rinehart Road. Angela's responsibilities include drainage discipline reviews of ATCs, technical proposals, and design -build plans and serving as lead ERC reviewer. Drainage Engineer. SR 50 from Sumter/Lake County Line to CR 33, FDOT District S. Lake County, FL. This project consisted of reconstruction of four miles of a two- lane major arterial roadway to a four -lane divided roadway. Approximately half the project length is rural with 65 mph design speed and half urban with 45 mph design speed. Project includes a roundabout at Tuscanooga Road, relocation of the CR 33 intersection, a shared use path, and an emergency access only signalized intersection. Angela supported the drainage design team on storm drain and ditch conveyance systems with calculations and plans preparation. Roadway Review Assistant. Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant Review, Central Florida Expressway Authority. Orange and Lake Counties, FL. Angela assisted in the Corridor Consultant Review of five design projects along approximately 10 miles of Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-19 Continued: Angela Shepard, PE Wekiva Parkway, a limited access toll facility through sensitive environmental and public lands. Review included roadway design, comp -book quantities, and engineer's cost estimates. • Drainage Support. FOOT Connect Drainage Resources for Bentley's Subsurface Utility Design and Analysis (SUDA), FOOT CADD Office. Tallahassee, FL. Angela supported overall review, configuration and resource development for FDOT Connect workspace in conjunction with Bentley's SUDA software, part of the OpenRoads for 3D modeling platform. • Senior Project Drainage Engineer. SR 518 (Eau Gallie Blvd) Intersection Improvements at Mosswood Dr, FOOT District 5. Brevard County, FL. Angela performed storm drain design to accommodate proposed widening to accommodate a new left turn lane at the Mosswood Dr intersection along a quarter mile of SR 518. • Senior Project Drainage Engineer. SR 527 (S Orange Ave) from SR 482/Sand Lake Road To Prince Street, FOOT District 5.Orange County, FL. Angela supported preliminary drainage study to identify future drainage improvements needed along corridor. She coordinated with District staff for adjacent development drainage connection permit requirements. Angela prepared preliminary storm drain design to accommodate proposed RRR improvements, including sidewalk and intersection improvements. • Senior Project Drainage Engineer. SunTrax — 60% plans, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise. Polk County, FL. Angela performed drainage calculations for conveyance facilities serving the SunTrax testing facility for autonomous and connected vehicles. The plans development is part of a pilot project for FTE using 3D modeling for the entire site, including over 60 alignments. • Senior Project Drainage Engineer. Curryville Road Storm Repair, Seminole County Public Works Department, Engineering Division. Seminole County, FL. Angela prepared permitting and drainage design for the bridge culvert replacement at the Curryville Road crossing of Robert's Branch. • Deputy Project Manager. Seminole County Stormwater Master Plan, Seminole County Public Works. Seminole County, FL. As part of the GEC services provided to Seminole County Engineering, Angela co -led assessment of the County's stormwater needs as documented in completed studies for the purpose of developing a prioritized list of projects and study updates. The task included project identification, validation, evaluation, and prioritization and coordination efforts with County and City staff. • GEC Drainage Reviewer.1-295 from Buckman Bridge to 1-95 Design Build, FOOT District 2. Jacksonville, FL. Angela performed plans and calculations reviews, provided comments, and participated in comment resolution during drainage design and construction. • Project Drainage Engineer.1-295 from Buckman Bridge to 1-95, RFP Concept Plans, FOOT District 2. Jacksonville, FL. Angela performed RFP concept drainage design for the widening of four miles of a three -lane to a five -lane interstate. Drainage design elements included culvert extensions, pond design, ditch and storm sewer design. She provided drainage discipline plans review of the design -build firm's submittals. • Project Drainage Engineer. US 17 Final Design, FOOT District 2. Putnam County, FL. Angela prepared the drainage design for the widening of 4 miles of two-lane rural roadway to a four -lane high speed urban roadway. Drainage design elements include storm drains, ditches, culvert replacement, wet and dry pond design and routing. • Project Drainage Engineer. SR 200 (SRA1A) Final Design, FOOT District 2. Nassau County, FL. Angela prepared the drainage design for the widening of 3 miles of four -lane rural roadway to a six -lane high speed urban roadway and DDI interchange at 1-95. Drainage design elements include storm drains, ditches, culvert extensions, pond design and routing. • Project Manager. Seminole County Engineering GEC Services, Seminole County Public Works Department, Engineering Division. Seminole County, FL. As part of the GEC services provided to Seminole County Engineering, Angela conducted quality control plan reviews, performed project validation, and developed project schedules. She provided drainage design support for in-house design projects. • Staff Engineer. West Bay Parkway Extension Corridor Feasibility Study, FOOT District 3. Bay County, FL. Angela conducted the land suitability mapping analysis for the proposed extension of West Bay Parkway from State Road 77 (S.R. 88) to S.R. 75 (US 231) in Bay County, Florida. The analysis identified constraints and opportunities due to the presence of sensitive natural, physical and sociocultural features within the project study area. Results were used to develop initial corridors and estimate potential impacts. • QA Auditor (Design/Build, Design). Central Florida Commuter Rail Transit Project Phase 2 South, FDOT District 5.Osceola County, FL. As part of services provided for the Quality Assurance Program Plan for design submittals prepared by the design -build firm, Angela verified implementation and compliance with all aspects of the QA system, prepared written checklists, performed audits, and documented results. She verified that follow-up actions were performed, including performing a re -audit of deficient areas. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-20 Rick Gorsira PERMITTING/ENVIRONMENTAL (JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ Rick is experienced in ecological assessments, stormwater, QUALIFICATIONS surface water, groundwater, wetland delineation, sediment BS, Zoology, sampling design, and wildlife assessments. He specializes University of Florida in monitoring wellfield withdrawal impacts on wetland hydrology and other water supply projects. Rick has REGISTRATIONS/ extensive experience in aerial photo -interpretation, CERTIFICATIONS hydroperiod assessments, water supply and reuse water Wetland Delineator recharge applications, and Environmental Resource Program (provisional): (ERP) permitting of water supply projects throughout US Army Corps Florida. Rick has successfully delivered several projects for of Engineers, Collier County, including the Pine Ridge Road Improvements Jacksonville District, project and Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension project. Florida Selected Projects YEARS OF EXPERIENCE Lead Scientist. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, 39 Collier County. Collier County, FL. This project involved permitting and design of a new road from Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to 16th Street NE in Collier County, Florida, including expansion of an existing two-lane road. The proposed right-of-way width was 200 feet for a total length of seven miles. Proposed canal improvements included the relocation of Cypress Canal at two locations and two new bridges over Cypress Canal and one bridge over Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, and Orange Tree Canal each for the proposed roadway. As Lead Scientist, Rick coordinated the acquisition of wetland mitigation credits from existing wetland banks and panther habitat units to offset impacts to habitats. Task Manager. Pine Ridge Road Improvements, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Rick served as Task Manager on the permitting of Pine Ridge Road (CR 896), an existing four -lane, divided roadway in Collier County. Collier County contracted our team for design services to improve this section of roadway, from Airport Pulling Road to Logan Boulevard, from a four -lane, rural roadway to a six -lane divided urban section. As Task Manager, Rick was responsible for wetland assessments, endangered and threatened species surveys, and permitting for this roadway. He submitted permit applications for the proposed widening including a Management and Storage of Surface Waters (MSSW) stormwater management permit, wetland resource permit, FOOT permit, Collier County well drilling and vegetative removal permit, and SFWMD Big Cypress Basin Board ROW Use Permit. Rick submitted permit applications upon the completion of 65% design drawings. Rick worked closely with the engineering team by reducing impacts to wetlands so no mitigation would be required for the roadway construction. Ecologist. Paradise Run 50-mgd Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Technology Demonstration Project, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). FL. Jacobs supervised ecological field site reconnaissance to support planning and conceptual design of the Paradise Run ASR Demonstration System, which is proposed as a 10-well, 50-mgd surface water storage facility on the Kissimmee River/C-38just downstream of S-65E. Information was needed to assess potential ecological impacts on wetlands associated with the proposed constructed wetland system to serve as an initial pretreatment prior to water storage in the upper and middle Floridan aquifer in stacked ASR wells. Rick participated in field surveys to confirm the presence of threatened and endangered wildlife species within the project site footprint. Project Scientist/Quality Control Analyst. Wellfield, City of Fort Myers. Fort Myers, FL. Jacobs conducted a study for the City's wellfield to assess operational effects of the shallow wells on the surrounding wetland communities and hydrology. This wellfield was augmented with surface water from the Caloosahatchee River, which was pumped to infiltration galleries within the wellfield. The wellfield operation has since been modified to deeper artesian and Floridan aquifer sources to accommodate Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-21 Continued: Rick Gorsira the growing demand on the water supply. Monitoring demonstrated that augmentation of the wellfield has limited the extent of hydrological impact and has resulted in positive impacts on the forested wetlands within the wellfield. Project Manager. Water Use Permit Monitoring, Bonita Springs Utilities. Bonita Springs, FL. Rick managed the monitoring of a wetland habitat to assess the impact of water withdrawals of two wellfields as part of a Consumptive Use Permit. Rick led biannual assessments of vegetation and hydrologic response to operation of the wells located in the Tamiami aquifer. Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method assessments were performed on a biannual basis to determine effects of wellfield operation during the dry and wet seasons. The team successfully negotiated with the SFWMD to reduce monitoring requirements, resulting in significant cost savings to the client. Senior Scientist/Ecologist. Compliance Monitoring Program, Tampa Bay Water Bill Young Regional Water Supply Reservoir. Hillsborough County, FL. Rick served as a senior scientist and ecologist supporting a semiannual habitat monitoring program for the construction of the Tampa Bay Regional Reservoir. A total of 12 transects were established within floodplain wetlands of adjacent creeks to assess baseline conditions. Based on the current monitoring data, operational effects from the reservoir were determined during system operation. The monitoring stations were established with the goal of assessing the potential hydrological effects on the nearby vegetation communities and downstream habitats. Project Scientist. Freedom Park Stormwater Storage, City of Naples. Collier County, FL. Rick served as Project Scientist for the off line stormwater storage for the Freedom Park in Collier County. He conducted wetland delineation of freshwater forested wetland and listed species survey and prepared an onsite wetland mitigation design and plan. He submitted an ERP application and coordinated with SFWMD, USACE, and FWC for ERP review. The ERP application included the park development including educational facility, wetland enhancement, and treatment wetlands. He conducted gopher tortoise surveys and coordinated with FWC for an incidental take permit for 16 gopher tortoise burrows. Project Manager. Stormwater Canal Sediment Removal, Pinellas County. Pinellas County, FL. Rick managed permitting services for the removal of accumulated sediment in the stormwater outfall canals at 16 locations within the County. He managed ecological studies of the stormwater canals to assess impacts to wetlands, listed species, and water quality, especially receiving waters to assess impacts from proposed sediment removal. Under his leadership, the team developed innovative strategies for permitting which resulted in channel geometry improvements and slope stabilization to reduce sediment load and reduce future maintenance within these stormwater canals in Pinellas County. Lead Scientist. Northwest Five Watershed Management Plan Update, Hillsborough County. Hillsborough County, FL. Rick worked with the team to conduct field investigations for devising best management practices (BMPs) for Northwest Five Watersheds, which included Rocky Brushy, Sweetwater/Lower Sweetwater, Double Branch, and Brooker Creek. Conducted assessments post -summer floods to respond to citizen concerns and investigate potential impediments to stormwater conveyance. As a result of these investigations, Hillsborough County requested development of a comprehensive sediment management plan. The team used a statistical approach to identify and optimize sediment management in the watersheds. The overall goal was to reduce sediment management by targeting specific areas, reducing upstream flooding in the watershed. Lead Scientist. Crews Lake Natural Systems Restoration, Pasco County. Pasco County, FL. The team prepared a plan of study for the Crews Lake Natural Systems Restoration project, which will use hydrologically -altered wetlands in Crews Lake to receive Pasco County reclaimed water for storage of wet -weather flow, as allowed under the Wetlands Application Rule, Ch. 62 611, FAC. Baseline monitoring requirements will involve water and sediment quality, biological community composition, and hydrologic characterization for one year as required in the rule. Project Manager. McKay Creek Sediment Analysis and Nutrient Reduction Credit, Pinellas County, FL. Rick managed a sediment assessment within McKay Creek to evaluate the potential to receive reduction credits towards the total maximum daily load (TMDL) based on the sediment nitrogen load to the estuarine segment of the creek, and characterized sediments to determine disposal options and provide information to contractors for sediment removal with equipment. Project Manager. Kissimmee Lakes Littoral Zone, SFWMD. Osceola County, FL. Rick managed a littoral zone study of the four Kissimmee River headwater lakes (Cypress, Hatchineha, Kissimmee, and Tiger). The study was designed to document littoral zone vegetative community conditions as a baseline for future monitoring of ecological response to the proposed implementation of the Headwaters Revitalization Water Regulation schedule. Species level vegetation cover of the littoral zone and FLUCCS cover of the upland transects were recorded on a PC tablet with a database application. Airboat access and use of innovative field data documentation technologies were an essential element of this project. The team analyzed transect and quadrat replication to make sure the statistical power of the data was adequate to support future monitoring efforts of change in vegetation community characteristics. Project Scientist/Quality Control Analyst. Ave Maria Reclaimed Water System Wetland Storage Project, Collier County. Collier County, FL. The team conducted routine monitoring of the water quality, vegetation, soils, fish, invertebrate, wildlife, and surface and groundwater water levels of hydrologically impacted cypress and marsh wetlands near Immokalee. Rick's responsibilities included field platform maintenance, well sampling, logistics planning, water quality sampling and quality control review, vegetation and wildlife data collection, office data base input and quality control review, analysis, and report preparation. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-22 Mike Dickey, PE UTILITIES ( JOHNSON ENGINEERING ) EDUCATION/ Mike brings extensive experience delivering utility projects QUALIFICATIONS and currently serves as Director of Johnson Engineering's BS Civil Engineering utilities market group. His project experience includes (1997), University master planning, hydraulic modeling, and designing water of South Florida distribution systems, wastewater collection systems, irrigation systems, and pumping facilities. Mike's experience REGISTRATIONS/ also includes working for a local utility contractor, which CERTIFICATIONS gave him a unique perspective of how the utilities he designs Professional today come together in the field. With both utility design Engineer: FL and construction experience, Mike has a comprehensive (License No. 60057) understanding of the entire utility development process YEARS OF from planning through design, permitting, and construction. EXPERIENCE He knows how to develop a design that works both in theory 25 and in practice. Selected Projects Project Manager. Northeast Service Area Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), IQ and Potable Booster Pump Stations, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Johnson Engineering is a member of a design -build team that is constructing an interim wastewater treatment plant, potable water pumping and storage facilities, irrigation water facilities, and pipeline infrastructure for Collier County. The interim WWTP will have a capacity of 1.5 MGD and will serve Collier County's Northeast Service Area. Mike managed surveying, site development plans, pipeline design, electrical design, development of a groundwater monitoring plan, and permitting assistance. The project is expected to be completed in 2021 at a cost of approximately $75 million. Project Manager. 91 st and 92nd Street Water Main Replacement, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Mike managed design of the replacement of approximately 10,000 linear feet of 12-inch and 8-inch water main in Collier County along 91 st and 92nd street located within the Naples Park area. Key design elements included identifying an alignment within congested rights of way that would accomplish project goals while minimizing impacts to the existing residents and allow the existing asbestos cement water main to remain in service during construction. Design also included provisions to remove the entire AC water main once the new system was in service. Mike managed survey, design, permitting, and bidding services. Project Manager. Vanderbilt Cut -de -Sacs Water Main Replacement, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Mike served as Project Manager for the replacement design of approximately 16,000 linear feet of 8-inch and 4-inch water main in Collier County along Vanderbilt Drive and finger streets between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Immokalee Road. Key design elements included identifying an alignment within congested rights of way that would accomplish project goals while minimizing impacts to the existing residents and allow the existing asbestos cement water main to remain in service during construction. Design also included provisions to remove the entire AC water main once the new system was in service. Mike managed the survey, design, permitting and bidding services. Project Manager. Field Data Collection, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Mike is managing ongoing services for Collier County to determine wastewater system pressure and flow conditions. Work includes installing pressure transducers at various locations on the force main system to record pressure and installing low pressure data collectors in lift station wet wells to monitor water levels over an extended period of time. Using known geometry of wet well and supervisory control and data acquisition information provided by Collier County, flow rates can be determined along with corresponding pressures. This is similar to performing multiple pumps downs over an extended period of time and allows for a higher level of confidence in comparison to a single pump down performed one moment in time. This information can be used to determine force main connection head, force main system and lift station deficiencies and potential for infiltration and inflow in the wastewater collection system. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-23 Continued: Mike Dickey, PE • Project Manager. Heritage Bay Master Pump Station, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Mike managed design of a Master Pumps Station capable of conveying a peak flow of approximately 2,700 gpm from the Heritage Bay development and serving as a re -pump for various stations along the CR 951 corridor in Collier County. • Project Manager. South Conveyance 30" Water Main, Lee County. Lee County, FL. Mike managed the design and permitting of 13,000 linear feet of pipeline. This project required FDOT permitting to cross 1-75. Mike managed preparation of multiple design alternatives including directional drilling before deciding on ajack and bore crossing for 1-75. Design Services for Wilson Boulevard Widening I RPS No. 22-8006 Page D-24 Jacobs Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow.