The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 12/13/2022 Item # 9B (Ordinance - Rezoning Petition- PL20210002449)9.B 12/13/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure to be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district, to allow up to 13 single family dwelling units with a maximum density of up to 2.45+/- dwelling units per acre on property located at 5715 Maple Lane, west of the Myrtle Cove Acres Unit 1 Subdivision, north of Maple Lane, and southwest of Tamiami Trail East, in Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (PL20210002449) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) recommendations and render a decision regarding the rezoning petition. CONSIDERATIONS: The request is to rezone 5.3+/- acres from the Rural Agriculture (A) zoning district to the Residential Single -Family District-4 (RSF-4) zoning district. The property is an unplatted parcel identified as Folio Number 00439520009, located on the north side of Maple Lane, west of the Myrtle Cove Acres Subdivision approximately 1.25 miles west of Tamiami Trail East. This is a conventional rezoning request to the RSF-4 zoning district, which is established in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.02.A, and is intended: ... to provide lands primarily for single-family residences. These districts are intended to be single- family residential areas of low density. The nature of the use of the property is the same in all these districts. Variation among the RSF-1, RSF-2, RSF-3, RSF-4, RSF-5, and RSF-6 districts is in requirements for density, lot area, lot width, yards, height, floor area, lot coverage, parking, landscaping, and signs.... The maximum density permissible in the residential single-family (RSF) districts and the urban mixed -use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in the RSF district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future land use element. The site has been used as a landscape nursery and operates under the name Emerald Landscaping. Operation of the property as a commercial landscape business will be discontinued as a result of the rezoning. The Future Land Use Map Designation is Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, and Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. In order to develop the site at the allowable density of up to 3 dwellings per acre (16 units) in the Urban Coastal Fringe land use category within the Coastal High Hazard Area in accordance with the GMP, rezoning is necessary. Conditions of approval are proposed to address compatibility, limiting the density to 2.45 dwellings per acre, or 13 dwelling units. The complete staff analysis for this petition is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by the application of ad valorem tax rates, and Packet Pg. 61 12/13/2022 9.B that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Given the location in the Coastal High Hazard Area, the Density Rating System of the GMP allows for 3 dwelling units per acre, which equates to a maximum of 16 dwelling units. The proposed single-family subdivision limited to a maximum of 13 single-family units is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The Rezone can also be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan and with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC held a public hearing on the petition on November 3, 2022. Six members of the public spoke with objections and concerns about drainage, traffic, safety, compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, and impact on neighborhood character. The CCPC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the rezoning with conditions, subject to stipulations discussed during the hearing, which were to refine the wording of conditions to restrict any type of connectivity between the property and Raintree Lane and to specify that traffic calming is an activity that may be implemented through the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) process. The proposed updates to the conditions have been incorporated into the proposed ordinance. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Petitioner is requesting a rezone to the RSF-4 Zoning District. The attached staff report, and recommendations of the Planning Commission are advisory only and are not binding on you. All testimony given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed rezoning is consistent with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question Petitioner or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. Should you consider denying the rezone, to assure that that your decision is not later found to be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for Straight Rezones Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map, and the Growth Management Plan elements? 2. Will the proposed rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? Would the proposed rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 4. Are the existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change? 5. Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary? 6. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 7. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise, affect public safety? 8. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 9. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? Packet Pg. 62 9.B 12/13/2022 10. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? it. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 12. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? 13. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning? 14. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County? 15. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. What is the impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended? 18. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to this rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners deems important in protecting public health, safety, and welfare? This item has been approved as to form and legality, and it requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (DDP) RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the Ordinance approving the rezoning to RSF-4 subject to the conditions as recommended by the CCPC and incorporated in the Ordinance. Prepared by: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. ddp.nb.Maple Lane RZ-Staff Report (PDF) 2. Att A - Ordinance 11-07-22 (PDF) 3. Att B - Myrtle Cove Acres 1 - PB 3 PG 38 (PDF) 4. [LINKED] Att C - NIM Documents & Transcript (PDF) 5. [LINKED] Att D - PL20210002449 CCPC Backup Packet (PDF) 6. Att E - Correspondence thru 11-8 (PDF) 7. Affidavit Sign Posting (PDF) 8. hearing date updated - Sign Photo 10132022 (PDF) 9. legal ad - agenda ID 23873 (PDF) Packet Pg. 63 9.B 12/13/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.B Doc ID: 23873 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district, to allow up to 13 single family dwelling units with a maximum density of up to 2.45+/- dwelling units per acre on property located at 5715 Maple Lane, west of the Myrtle Cove Acres Unit 1 Subdivision, north of Maple Lane, and southwest of Tamiami Trail East, in Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Zoning Petition RZ-PL20210002449) Meeting Date: 12/13/2022 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 11/08/2022 5:15 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/08/2022 5:15 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Growth Management Department Zoning Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Mike Bosi Division Director Diane Lynch Growth Management Department Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer James C French Growth Management Derek D. Perry Level 2 Attorney Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 11/10/2022 3:34 PM Completed 11/17/2022 1:46 PM Completed 11/17/2022 3:39 PM Completed 11/23/2022 3:56 PM Completed 12/02/2022 9:20 AM Completed 12/02/2022 9:49 AM Completed 12/02/2022 12:37 PM Completed 12/02/2022 1:09 PM Completed 12/07/2022 11:39 AM 12/13/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 64 9.B.1 Co flier County STAFF REPORT o N N TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION J FROM: DIVISION OF PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT a GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LO HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2022 n SUBJECT: PL20210002449; 5175 MAPLE LANE REZONE N 0 0 0 PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner(s): Wolfgang Gilles C/O German Services, Inc. 3960 Radio Road, Suite #208 Naples, FL 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent(s): D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Naples, FL 34102 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a rezone of the subject +/-5.3 acre site from the Rural Agriculture (A) zoning district to the Residential Single - Family District-4 (RSF-4) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The property is +/-5.3 acres (Parcel No. 00439520009) located on the north side of Maple Lane, approximately 1.25 miles west of Tamiami Trail East, in Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 October 18, 2022 Page 1 of 13 Packet Pg. 65 9.B.1 0 m v �(D N r CD a) N 7 N CD 70 CD N 0 D m r N 0 N 0 0 0 N A W x a ti DR PROJECT ¢Q ♦ o� LOCATION F-Raintreel' t 3 WAY e rery C ress L 1 M rtle LN C I 4FP FRI A� Location Map WENTWORTH ss 0 ESTATES D SITE NLOCATIOON"� Petition Number: PL20210002449 MICEU I PUD o c O p � WNi E fAWLE FRR 0 �D CS) I o Q o Zoning Map 1 0 1 n 10 a� a LO r` LO rn N O O O N O N J a c 0 a C 0 N M r- 00 M N 0 Q NN� 1.6 N a� c J tZ f0 I Packet Pg. 66 9.B.1 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is a +/-5.3 acre parcel located at 5175 Maple Lane, approximately 1.25 miles west of Tamiami Trail East, and zoned Rural Agriculture (A). It is currently an active landscape nursery and operates under the name Emerald Landscaping. The requested action is to rezone the property to the Residential Single -Family District-4 (RSF-4) zoning district to develop up to 13 single family dwellings. The Future Land Use Map Designation is Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. A conceptual lot layout is proposed, depicting 13 single family lots, see below for the Conceptual Site Plan, also included with the Draft Ordinance as Exhibit A-1. Q m 2 X W PROPERTY I I . DE PROPERTY IIII II TRACT'6' I I LINE ++IIII I Itl 75 �11 I I Il1EI 15C a 6 a Illll 1� I 1 1 l � 1 III I 41 I LI y1 1 1 w —I IT I I I ' Ex. 35' r 7. `Ps ) NAINT. ESMT. 4 3 �2� II I J J L_ _ {TYP) J EX. 8 E —--TRACT'R'-— IIII 7 I ppIII j� L1. sI 9�s71 I II 0711 12 13-II 30 8 I SCALE: 1" = 100' PROPERTY MAPLE LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN REVISED September 20, 2022 -1 l II II II II II II LINE MIN. LOT SIZE 70' BY 125 {TYP) ®GradyMinor rmnnn,:. ianor.:wennnueclx The Conceptual Site Plan depicts the development standards of the RSF-4 Zoning District as listed in LDC Section 4.02.01 will be met or exceeded. See below for development standards applicable to the RSF-4 Zoning District. Zoning District Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Area (linear feet) Coverage (square feet) RSF-3 10,000 Corner lot Interior lot None 95 80 RSF-4 7,500 75 70 None 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 October 18, 2022 Page 3 of 13 Packet Pg. 67 9.B.1 Zoning Minimum Minimum Side Yard (feet) Minimum Rear district Front Yard Yard (feet) (feet) RSF-3 Waterfront Non -waterfront 30 10 7.5 25 RSF-4 10 7.57M SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject parcel: North & South: Residential (Treviso Bay), zoned Wentworth Estates MPUD (Ord. No. 03-51, as amended) (across Maple Lane to the south is preservation area). To the northeast is The Miceli PUD which was approved for 17 multifamily units and commercial development in 1992 (Ord. No. 92- 62) but is currently undeveloped. East: Single Family Residential (Myrtle Cove Acres Subdivision), zoned Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) West: Single Family home, zoned Rural Agricultural District (A) 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 4 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 68 9.B.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): This 5.3 acre site is proposed for 13 single family dwelling units. The connection will be from local roads to US 41. It is designated as Urban, Urban Mixed o Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and zoned A, Rural Agricultural. The applicant requests rezoning from A to RSF-4. W c Given the location in the Coastal High Hazard Area, the Density Rating System of the GMP allows for 3 dwelling units per acre, which equates to a maximum of 16 dwelling units. The proposed single-family subdivision limited to a maximum of 13 single family units is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. r LO Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states, "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " According to the Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) dated June 24, 2022 (revised), provided with this petition; with the proposed Maple Lane Residential Development generating a total of +/-15 PM peak hour two-way trips on the following roadway segments with the listed capacities according to the current 2021 AUIR: 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 5 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 69 9.B.1 Roadway Link/ID Current Peak 2021 2021 Hour Peak AUIR AUIR Direction Service LOS Remaining Volume/Peak Capacity Direction Tamiami Trail Rattlesnake Hammock 3,000/East D 628 East (US-41) Road to Triangle Boulevard/93.0 Note: The proposed development has a de minimis (less than 1%) impact on the adjacent roadway segment. Based on the 2021 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed new trips for this development within the 5-year planning period. Additionally, the proposed development represents a de minimis impact on the adjacent road network. Therefore, the subject Rezone can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental staff evaluated the petition, and the request is found consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the COME. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff finds the subject petition may only be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan based upon the applications satisfaction of the Future Land Use, Transportation and Conservation and Coastal Management Elements of the GMP. Staff concludes that this petition is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. This evaluation is completed as part of the Zoning and Land Development Review provided below. Drainage: The project's surface water management system will be designed to a 25-year/3-day storm event. Condition of approval #2 requires the design to discharge south of the County's drainage control structure as shown in the applicant's Conceptual Water Management Plan (Exhibit A-2 of the attached Draft Ordinance), subject to final review and approval by County Stormwater Staff at time of SDP or subdivision plat review. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The property has been historically maintained cleared of native vegetation. Therefore, the Master Plan does not show a preserve because no minimum preservation is required. The previous land activities 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 6 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 70 9.B.1 (landscaping nursery) involving the use and or storage of hazardous material will require soil/ground water testing at the time of SDP and/or PPL to meet the requirements of LDC Section 3.08.00.A.4.d. No listed animal species were observed on the property. However, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP review. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this development with the following conditions of approval: • No project access via Raintree Lane; access will be via Maple Lane only (Condition #1) • maximum total daily trip generation not to exceed 15 two-way PM peak hour net trips (Condition #4) • developer will participate with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) if the program is activated and will pay proportionate fair share costs associated with improvements that are determined through the NTMP process (Condition #8). Utility Review: The petitioner's "Statement of Utility Provisions" indicates water service and sewage disposal will be provided by the Collier County utility system. Conditions of approval #5, 6, and 7 are recommended to address utility capacity and service at time of development permitting. ZoninQ Review: The current zoning is A -Rural Agricultural, which permits one dwelling unit to be constructed. The rezoning is necessary in order to develop the site at the density allowable per the GMP. The land use pattern in the local area consists of single family residential. The property is located in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, within the Coastal High Hazard Area, which allows for density of 3 dwelling units per acre, or up to 16 dwelling units on the +/-5.3-acre property. The proposed rezoning from Rural Agricultural (A) to the RSF-4 zoning district will permit development of up to 16 dwellings; however, the applicant commits to limit the maximum number of single-family units on the property to 13 dwellings. 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 7 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 71 9.B.1 The Myrtle Cove Acres neighborhood to the east is zoned RSF-4, although it is notable that the subdivision was platted with lot widths of 100 feet, exceeding the minimum of 75 feet. The Subdivision Plat shown below is also provided as Attachment B. UNIT N91 MYRTLE COVE ACRES A 5UVINISION OF PART OF 51 OF 5ECTIoN 2a T50S.. RUE WEST OF TAWMI TRAIL COLLIER COUNTY,FLORI DA Scale: '-W. Jwy, 1955 e oa �Pr ni �•� hn R... r.+r erg' PLAT 600K 3. dAAE 39 1 ssl� DESCRI-61 nED—Illu nCk NOW�E J6..e e.T APVRWAa9 nc To the north and west is the Wentworth Estates MPUD which is also developed with single family homes. To the northeast is The Miceli PUD which was approved for 17 dwelling units and commercial development on +/-8.7 acres that are currently undeveloped. Staff has evaluated the proposed use related to density and compatibility and concluded that the proposed rezoning to RSF-4, subject to the proposed conditions limiting to maximum of 13 dwellings, is consistent with the surrounding land use pattern and Future Land Use Element of the GMP. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.081 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses are provided following each criterion): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 October 18, 2022 Page 8 of 13 Packet Pg. 72 9.B.1 The subject property is within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict as designated on the County FLUM. The existing zoning of the property is Rural Agricultural (A), which allows a maximum density of 1 unit per 5 acres per the Land Development Code. Because the property is located in the Coastal High Hazard Area and subject to the density rating system of the FLUE, the requested rezoning to Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) will allow the property to develop at up to 3 units per acre (16 total dwellings), however the recommended condition of approval #2 further limits the site to a maximum of 13 single family dwelling units. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined that the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The proposed rezoning is compatible with the existing land use pattern in this area, which is low density residential. Property to the north includes residential dwellings within the Wentworth Estates MPUD, known as Treviso Bay. Property to the east is zoned RSF-4 and developed with single-family residences (note that the Myrtle Cove Acres subdivision was platted with lot widths of 100 feet, exceeding the minimum lot width of 75 feet). A single family home zoned Rural Agricultural (A) is located to the west. The proposed single-family subdivision as depicted in Exhibit A-1 attached to the Draft Ordinance will be in keeping with the land use patterns in the area. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed rezoning will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property to the east is also zoned RSF-4. The intent of the proposed RSF-4 zoning district is to permit a single-family home subdivision, which is similar to other single- family subdivisions in the surrounding area. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundary is logically drawn. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezoning from Rural Agricultural (A) to RSF-4 is not necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Development of the site will be required to meet site design standards of the LDC to ensure no adverse impact to living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak a� 0 N N aD J aD a M LO T LO 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 9 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 73 9.B.1 volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed development at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. The project's development must also comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations and operational improvements when development approvals are sought at time of Site Development Plan (SDP) or Plat review. Ingress and egress to the subject property will utilize access Maple Lane as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, included with the Draft Ordinance as Exhibit A-1. Additional operational impacts for the facility will be reviewed at time of Plat or SDP. The TIS submitted by the applicant indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period as noted above and not adversely impact further the surrounding roadway network. Recommended condition of approval #8 is that the developer will participate with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) if the program is activated by the neighboring property owners and will pay proportionate fair share of costs associated with improvements that are determined through the NTMP process. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. To address drainage associated with the proposed development, recommended condition of approval #3 is that the project's surface water management system be designed to a 25 year/3- day storm event and will be discharged south of the County's drainage control structure as shown in the Conceptual Water Management Plan attached to the Draft Ordinance as Exhibit A-2, subject to final review and approval by County Stormwater Staff at time of SDP or subdivision plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed rezone from A to RSF-4 would not reduce light and air to adjacent areas Development of the site will need to meet all site design standards set forth in the LDC. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market forces. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacentproperty in accordance with existing regulations. The rezoning is not anticipated to be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Q C 0 N N a� c J Q R 2 L0 T LO 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 10 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 74 9.B.1 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed rezoning, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to relate to public welfare because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The minimum lot size for the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district is 5 acres, which allows one single-family home to be constructed. Operation of the property as a commercial landscape business will be discontinued as a result of the rezoning. In order to develop the site at the allowable density permitted in the Urban Coastal Fringe land use category within the Coastal High Hazard Area in accordance with the GMP, the rezoning is necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The proposed rezoning to the RSF-4 zoning district has been conditioned as outlined in the Draft Ordinance to be in scale with the needs of the neighborhood and the County. The Growth Management Plan allows for density to accommodate up to 16 single family lots; however, condition of approval #2 limits the site to 13 single family dwellings. The Conceptual Site Plan, included with the Draft Ordinance as Exhibit A-1, is in scale with the surrounding area. 15. Whether is k it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the use proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The previous land activities (landscaping nursery) involving the use and or storage of hazardous material will require soil/ground water testing at the time of SDP and/or PPL to meet the requirements of LDC Section 3.08.00.A.4.d. Future development anticipated by the rezoning will require evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the development review process. c 0 N N aD J _(D Q M 2 LO T LO 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 11 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 75 9.B.1 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. Q c 0 The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable W goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. J 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. LO T To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. LO NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on February 23, 2022, at South Regional Library, Meeting Room A, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at 7:01 p.m. Approximately 34 participants attended in person as well as 4 ZOOM participants. The applicant's representative presented the proposed rezoning to convert the property from Agriculture to RSF-4 to allow for development of up to 16 single family homes at a density of 3 units per acre, consistent with the surrounding community. The agent described and displayed a concept plan with 13 lots with a hammerhead roadway design, noting the design or total number of lots was not finalized. Attendees expressed concerns about traffic, access, drainage, intensification, and incompatibility. The owner of property immediately west of the subject site asked questions about setbacks and vegetative screening due to privacy concerns. A property owner noted that the zoning designation of RSF-4 applies to Myrtle Cove Acres, however the lots were platted larger and wider (100 feet in width) than the minimum 70-foot width of the LDC, thus compatibility would be better afforded with an RSF-3 designation. Drainage issues and flooding problems were described by residents of the Myrtle Cove Acres subdivision. Comments and questions were raised about the current stormwater management conditions, the existing canal, the existing 50-foot drainage easement across the property, and the operation of County stormwater facilities in the area. Residents requested restricting access to the property to eliminate any connection to Raintree Lane. Concern was expressed about the volume and speed of new traffic along Maple Lane. Residents noted Maple Lane is a narrow road and swales inundate with stormwater constricting the ability for two cars to pass. Residents noted that the safety of school children walking or waiting for the bus needs to be addressed, as well as constrictions resulting from vehicles parking 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 12 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 76 9.B.1 in the Tamiami Court right-of-way. The impact of construction traffic on Maple Lane was also a concern. A copy of the NIM transcript is provided as Attachment C to this Staff Report. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC): This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's office on October 4, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward petition RZ- PL20210002449 Maple Lane Rezone to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval, subject to the eight conditions listed in the attached Draft Ordinance, Exhibit A. Attachments: A. Draft Ordinance B. Myrtle Cove Acres Subdivision (Plat Book 3, Page 38) C. NIM Documents and Transcript D. Application/Backup Material 5175 Maple Lane Rezone, PL20210002449 Page 13 of 13 October 18, 2022 Packet Pg. 77 9.B.2 ORDINANCE NO.2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-4 (RSF-4) ZONING DISTRICT, TO ALLOW UP TO 13 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF UP TO 2.45+/- DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5175 MAPLE LANE, WEST OF THE MYRTLE COVE ACRES UNIT 1 SUBDIVISION, NORTH OF MAPLE LANE, AND SOUTHWEST OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.3+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20210002449] WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property more particularly described in Exhibit B, located in Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier a County, Florida, is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Single a Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District to allow up to 13 single family dwelling units with a E maximum density of up to 2.45+/- dwelling units per acre for a 5.3+/- acre project, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit A. Exhibits A, A-1, A-2, B, and C are attached hereto and Q incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. [21-CPS-02183/1744106/2] Page 1 of 2 5175 Maple Lane / PL2021000244 Packet Pg. 78 9.B.2 SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 13th day of December 2022. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Derek D. Perry Assistant County Attorney 1 Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval Exhibit A-1: Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit A-2: Conceptual Water Management Plan Exhibit B: Legal Description Exhibit C: Location Map BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA in William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman [21-CPS-02183/1744106/2] Page 2 of 2 5175 Maple Lane / PL2021000244 Packet Pg. 79 9.B.2 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Raintree Lane west of Tamiami Court shall not connect to nor provide any direct or indirect access, construction or otherwise, to the subject property whatsoever. as c 2. A maximum of 13 single family lots may be developed on the property, arranged N substantially consistent with the lot layout shown in Exhibit A-1. 3. The project's surface water management system will be designed to a 25 year/3-day storm _J event and will be designed to discharge south of the County's drainage control structure as Q. tu shown in the Conceptual Water Management Plan (Exhibit A-2), subject to final review and M approval by County Stormwater Staff at time of SDP or subdivision plat review. ti LO 4. The maximum total daily trip generation for this project shall not exceed 15 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect o at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. c 5. A County Utility Easement (CUE) will be provided to cover the existing water main and service pipeline along the southern boundary of the property and will be shown on any final subdivision plat. If the CUE is not dedicated to the County by plat, a deed of utility easement must be conveyed in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (04-31, as amended) at no cost to the County or District for the existing water main and service pipeline. 6. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review, as determined by the County Manager or designee. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades, as determined by the County Manager or designee. 7. At time of SDP or subdivision plat review, a pump station report must be completed to confirm downstream wastewater system capacity. The developer shall correct any reported deficiency by commitment or agreement, at the discretion of the County Manager or designee. Developer will participate with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP), including traffic calming, if the program is activated and will pay proportionate fair share of costs associated with improvements that are determined through the NTMP process. [21-CPS-02183/1744106/2] Page 1 of 1 5175 Maple Lane / PL2021000244 Packet Pg. 80 PROPERTY LINE DE II BUFFER PER LQC III TRACT 'B' II i -1 }5 I� I r� �Ex. 50 � 0E17E I, _ - ,I L 7 I 1 1 \ \I \ II I �fc — r EX. 65' I /.5' (ITP) — gip' I MAINT, ESMT- I 3 li 2 1 -—TRACT'R'— - ,2_ —LA I I �11 I -- --�-� WII I,I �L �1I 30 iA.w• C L I F.. 1 ' (TYP) I Q 7.5 9 III (ryyrp�8 I � l I N ,,rrrn nrn, PROPERTY LINE 0 so, 100' SCALE: 1" = 100' MAPLE LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN REVISED September 20, 2022 EX. 60' AE PROPERTY LINE MIN. LOT SIZE 70' BY 125' (TYP) MGradyMinor r Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors Zoners • Landscape Arditects n.FrvQyt!lnnr i nm Packet P97,78171 9. B.2 N Q M� W 2 X w rl 1 1 WATER ill I MANAGEMENT l , AREA rJ Z1ilA � p ! 4 1� `o p 6 Xit I to - — - - -—TRACT'R'— - W �.I— li l I 7 III I !I 1 ! U I►II 4 8 ! 9 10 ti So' 100' SCALE: 1" = 100' 11 MAPLE LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN REVISED September 20, 2022 2 12 ® GradyMinor ; Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors Planners • Landscape Architects as c �a J d ti 0) iT le N O O O N 0 N J a 0 CD a a� c M ti 00 M N N I rl- v C M C 'a O a a CD E u r Q Packet Pg. 82 9.B.2 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5957 PAGES 219-220 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TRACT NO. 10, UNRECORDED ADDITION TO MYRTLE COVE ACRES IN THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, RUN NORTH 87'16'20" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION OF A SECTION FOR 4,505.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LANDS HEREBY CONVEYED, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING CONTINUE NORTH 87'16'20" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 357.93 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 3D, WHICH CORNER IS ALSO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID UNIT NO. 1, MYRTLE COVE ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 38, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 2'45'40 " WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID UNIT NO. 1, MYRTLE COVE ACRES FOR 677.05 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87'28'30" WEST FOR 329.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE THROUGH THE POINT OF BEGINNING PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30; THENCE RUN NORTH 0 21 '40" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 673.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 50 FEET AND THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF; SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES 50 FEET WIDE OVER AND ALONG THA T CERTAIN ROADWA Y EASEMENT DESCRIBED AND CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED IN OR BOOK 87, PAGES 267 AND 268, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COON T Y, FLORIDA. 0 N d N J LO L0 [21-CPS-02183/1744106/2] Page 1 of 1 5175 Maple Lane / PL2021000244 Packet Pg. 83 .�i t1 PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT C LOCATION MAP LN r Cypress LNI Nhvrtle LN Location Map f d 0 N d C cc J CD 0. ea u� ti Ln CD N O O O_ N O N J a 0 CD _ N M 00 N N ti O d t� C C L 0 Q Q CD E s 0 Q [21-CPS-02183 / 1744106/2 ] 5175 Maple Lane / PL2021000244 Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 84 (County N ti k 5'KI5util.EoSeme"-% �i�u LTA -B, 23.a41 �o"r� 5-1 �o INSERT STANDARD 5TREET END Scale: V'= 50' NOTE, P.R.M.'s are 4'K4"924'Concrete Monuments,or45c4'K66'Concrete Poets, both chord and arc distances are shown an curved lines with bearings tti chords. bearings are calculated -From an assumed bearing o+ N 39'04'L1/on 1- of poving of Tarn;ami Trail. All lot lines marked with Steel pins unless monuments indidoted. I hereby Certify that this plat of MYRTLE COVE ACRES, UNIT No.l is a true ond correct representation of a recent survey made and platted under my direction and that permanent reference monurnen--s (P.R.M.'s) have been set'm accordance with the. provisions o� Section 7, Chapter 10275 Laws of Florida,Acts of 1925. Reg. Land Sur yor Fl a. Certif i c ate No,35t 1.4` UNIT No I MYRTL COVE ACT�,�S A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF S# OF SECTION 29, T.50S.9 R.26E. WEST OF TAMIAMI TRAIL COLLIER COUNTY,,FLORIDA Scale e I "= 200' DE SCRI PTION All that Part of the south {'half(51) of Sec+ion 29,T.505.,R26E. lying south -:nd wes+4 the Tamiornl Troi1(5tateRoad No.90) except t}gat Parcel marked "Not Included in this Plat"pre— viousl g conveyed to Griffin bu deed recorded in peed Book 4 a+ Page 158 of the public records oar Coilier County, July, 1955 DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS 4ha-t Myrtle Cove, Inc. a corporotion under the rows of Florida, the owner ofthe here- on described lands hascausedthisplatofLINITNo.IMYRTLECOVE ACRES to be made and does hereby dedicateto the perpetual use of+he public all stree-hs,roods, Jones and/or courtsshown hereon. IN WITNE55 WHEREOF Myrtle Cove,lnc . has causedthis dedica- ti on to be signed in its name by ifs vice-presidentand its corporate 5eol to be af-Fixed,attes+ed by)ts secretarythiS---�-thdayofJuly, A. D. 1955• MYRTLE COVE,INC. i (r, ViCe-Ptesider,# 1 Attest . Secretary ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFCOLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFYtha+ onthis day, before me personally appeared RobertL.Wa)ker-and Jame.sL,.Wciker,respectively VicepresieJentand 5ecretaryof'MyrtreCove,Inc. ,a Corporation underthelaws JFlorlda, to me known fo bethe persons described in and who executed+hefare- goin9 dedicotionandthey ocknowledgedtheexecuti,onthereofto be their free act and deed as such officers,fortheuses and purposes therein mentioned) and tha+they affixed thereto the official seal ofsaid Corporation andthatsaid dedication isthegctarid deedof said corporation. WITNE55 my hand and official seal at Naples, said Countyond State,this 5 'day o-FJu1y,A.D-I955. Notary Public,,Sfa eoF Florida at large My Commi ssion exp1re5 ma-Y It 19-69 PLAT BOOK 3, IAA Chi E APPROVALS This Flat approved }his 5tb clay of d u, A.D. 1955 in open rnect- in9 of the board of County Commissioners of er Cbunty orida. Approved: r Chairman - ) HEREBYCERT'IFYthatthis plotof UNITNo.I,MYRTLE COVE ACRES has been examined by meand from my examination 1 fi nd that sai d platcomplies in form withthe requirementsof Chapter 10275,Lows ofFIorida,Acts of 1925. ✓4z,4Q I FURTHER CERTIFYthot said plat was fiiedinr recora! at_-rt. -this day o{JuIQ JulA. 0. 1955 and duly recpr;d.ed in Plat SooK , on Page o{ the pu blicrecords o{`CoI ierCoun- ty, Florida. , CIerkof Cr�I'ItCourt,�pand foF Collier Couniy,r1a. Packet Pg. 85 ' 9.B.6 TO: Collier County Planning Commission and/or Collier County Board of Commissioners SUBJECT: PETITION:PL20210002449 —5175 MAPLE LANE REZONE We hope to communicate our concerns regarding the proposed rezoning of agricultural land at the end of Maple Lane in Naples Florida. We purchased property on Maple Lane with the knowledge there would be no subdivision at the end of the street. Our intention was to raise our two young daughters in a neighborhood similar to our childhood homes. This was a decision based on assessment of both quality of life and safety. This proposed subdivision will change the fundamentals of our neighborhood. This comment is based both on our experience living in our home for 5 years and our attendance at Grady Minor's disappointing neighborhood information session. We understand the motivation and necessity for more housing in Collier County; but this current proposal has bad taste and lacks grace. Frankly, we are insulted by the lack of engagement Grady Minor and their client has had with our community. The proposed development is a poor match for this community and deteriorates our quality of life. Most importantly, our neighborhood has long-standing safety issues that do not add to our confidence in Collier County's ability to manage a SAFE rezoning and subdivision process. Vehicle/pedestrian safety and water management are serious existing issues that have not been adequately considered in this proposed development. If approved, this rezoning changes the conditions in which our family signed up to live. We expect Collier County to maintain or elevate our neighborhood's safety, not detract from it. As parents of a young family, we feel responsible for communicating our safety concerns and expect a similar level of diligence from our government in addressing these issues. We hope that the re -zoning proposal will be revised to better reflect Collier County's commitment to safety and quality of life. You are welcome to contact us to discuss this topic. Sincerely Myrtle Cove Estate Property Owners and Full Time Naples Residents Dr. Mitchell Ryan Lucas and Dr. Keira Justine Lucas October 28th 2022 1-239-351-0207 5248 Maple Lane Naples, FL 34113 a� _ 0 N d a� CU J a M 2 LO r Packet Pg. 86 9.B.6 LauraDeJohnVEN From: Sent: To: Subject: YoungbloodAndrew Thursday, November 3, 2022 1:06 PM LauraDeJohnVEN FW: Maple Lane Laura, I sent this to Ray and Bosi, and forgot to CC you. This guy was registered online for today's CCPC, but did no register to speak. He changed his mind after public comments were closed by the Chair. I told him he is welcome to attend the 12/13 BCC to have his concerns addressed at that time. Andrew Youngblood, MBA Operations Analyst Zoning Division o -w-r 014ftt 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Direct Line - 239.252.1042 and rew.Youngblood(a_colliercountyfl.gov From: David Jamison <dave@rainbowmortgageinc.com> Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 11:13 AM To: YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Maple Lane EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Mr Youngblood, I am a home owner on Maple Lane. I wanted to raise a concern about the road deterioration of Maple Lane with all the construction trucks that will be on the road during the process. I would like to propose the developer to redo the road once the construction is done. The road is not built to handle these types of vehicles. Just my thoughts. Your Friend in the Mortgage Business, David Jamison Rainbow Mortgage, Inc. 3300 Edinborough Way, Suite 550 Edina, MN55435 00 r a Packet Pg. 87 9.B.6 Ph: 952-405-2090 Fax. 952-658-1944 www.RainbowMortgaagelnc.com Click on Link to Apply now! www.rainbowmortgageinc.com David Jamison NMLS # 277794 Rainbow Mortgage NAILS # 345827 UWM TOP 1% Imagine how good you'll feel when you introduce the people you care about to a person you really trust. Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee. The information may also be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction, or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. if you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments, if any. E-mail is covered by the Electronics Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. m O N d N C J N R LO r L 6) N O O 0 N O N J d c O r m d c O N CO) ti 0 M N 0 r 3 t a+ d V C N C O N d L L O U W Q r C d E t v r a z Packet Pg. 88 November 2, 2022 Dear Sirs: Enclosed please find five (5) pages totaling to 85 signatures of a petition signed by Myrtle Cove Acres homeowners, property owners, taxpayers and/or registered voters opposing the petition number PL20210002449- 5175 Maple Lane Rezone. Additionally, please find copies of letters from: Dr. Mitchell Ryan and Dr. Keira Justine Lucas Carl and Karen Tisone Gale Jamison Susan Heitmann Steven and Brenda Pricer Stefan Petron Nycole Grodin and Ghunter Berky Kubra Akyuz It is my understanding that additional property owners, who are currently out of state, also oppose the petition number PL20210002449- 5175 Maple Lane Rezone and will attempt to sign the petition when they return to the state. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on 239 200-6342 or at the address below. Thank you. Sincerely, Kubra Akyuz 5259 Maple Lane Naples, FL 34113 as 0 N d a� c J N Q R 2 LO Packet Pg. 89 We, the residents of Myrtle Cove Acres, petition the Planning and Zoning Commission vote against petition number P120210002449- 5175 Maple Lane Rezone. Myrtle Cove Acres is an established neighborhood with older rain swells that tends to flood with heavy rain. Some of our residents even experiences flooding in their homes. A major increase in the number of houses can cause increase flooding and devastating loses in the future. Additionally, the neighborhood has tight roads and currently two vehicles at the same time cannot pass. Increase in traffic will make it extremely difficult to enter and exit the neighborhood for current and future resident of Myrtle Cove Acres. We as the residents of Myrtle Cove Acres, do not want our quiet and safe neighborhood to grow by tb homes. The major growth within the neighborhood changes the esthetics, it may lead to increase in crime. We are all against a major change however, the residents of Myrtle Cove Acres are open to discussing reduced number of homes for this petition. We, the residents of Myrtle Cove Acres demand that the Planning and Zoning Commission to vote against petition number P1202I0002-449- 1175 Maple Lane Rezone. Signature Full Name Email - Mailing Address Telepbone Addr w aC� b ttiv1 _atsyuZl Sa A.t,�%� tx. 92A-2m- t �h`1AA_bf_ "a+I- ;-�ag1e� -�C _3yIG 6c31kZ - Kloz.rirN k%Ab &"UZ914� 5a6+ M�QIe Lx\ a R-ate} A .tt [�gttrx;_l,S1a1+i...A7u l�s� _�.{..2gll3 .p$4�. _ 01* 5464 Al A W- -1 Am azI l � A . �rl�rnuil•aDrl...r.-_�eb—f-�-�1113. _.____�_c._�... __.. I -Or MAJ is Lw. ".%��! �"17 Sf L� • I �h'f�}C 1`-'r %.5� �� ✓�� -►�� t��j/ 7��f� 2fa `� $ ! �.' G%�� _ _ 52.n3 tA"le bAtG � `rGCY+'A �► i'�tY �kRrt'Gl-GIY�'1u�o`��iiai.� a3q_�itR "�st7 - - --f - � n pY 1uY allCvt ow F-I "-+rail ,mQW41 I-CRvt 3a•38 i % /7'1�tUttll Gug tnl,�tclo,�,l� sPz� Z �aa � aQ �`` �Q 3q -cod-0�4 U CuaAt o 530$ cy p( -L3a- %71,-t ' 139) 330.5.Z l0 13V330-r.Z to Packet Pg. 90 9.B.6 5Il.1 na�J,,ct Lw. Z3�1-1'Jsygb►�i amck�C%bo 14M c- CN �� Clfl.1SL�Yru�i ��c,o,.�tzsusa ��-iMc„�,�2�11 �3°1-teOl-i�R4 r�1�P�„r, �m�� yn��,e�� SzzN�itntr�t,✓ Z3R-Ga Z; r a7.31 i ',7s . / �5 t �Arnl °Qi °`t�orl 3 " ��' / � Svi12 i ; SuY,e � mA.l• c-`�^- Jq CA,'lcart.-h5ONO- � MR ' TIS�� rrw�l.ls�.5�,s �"� 3►�4-2Z3M9�� ytrGS �Hu Sz$� Mf1P1 ,�i al - � Ao 117Au��3mFfi-�z,+r. 0 tiP1 S� �-� 34+�3 375-3770 �;ehn G-.J1 S S2II TALI •�- b,6y v 'swan,,kM ► C4.. 70 t mZ)o Lc Q `��r�o J u 7►��lne� ob�li � s 5 �SaC rem L� �3�-a�� -oa3 � $z. 6 t4s 141 C 57_�o g rv;t Ln .eJ../�` �1A N A.(� 1�5 rF L 3't4+3 2� y -- 5� •� _ ><�,�c-t Packet Pg. 91 L-,L4CcL4 Kxlevm lQ }52"►k maptEln ¢a Zlaq �p2.; (urn -1 UDm . ltN Aql s FL -;LA 1-6 _.. h�Ia ��+Lo 'SoRY A4 Id[.a.,6 La3537�= Di ar)(A -�� 1135 04 R0 Fle rD l-one N_ § F+-"IS 4 bu ca SjC:b a y d 52�a it ' �r,t tr {'3ps Z3`1 StS'2�rg I S� a �1akr Le Wt IrR1hPL' 1cl$ sZ2tE �iirll Pry -" Tel N-VV,._ � _ �_.__.��n.��.,•ra.,..�,c,�-�Qc+.oTau�s��20��,��{��'�7�5�7I j 1A , 1-4 Cite. z ;Sz7--1JL wwc - -- j r et . Packet Pg. 92 9.B.6 �- � o�-fav i� [o(jOG �u�cl.co- GGrti �iG�d�GJ /il. 5i" Ro.:�ce Lam. Z3�-175�1o1�i �C'CIGI,6rt�il �Pc�a�stz3Vs0 ��s�hnr�e�l� -7-Y t of-�taq ��! 1f7 phc Lblr, Y„ti.n, . 5:22-y44Af11,Z/ Z3g Gri LPoN.1.ri�, w, Is � �o`� �q cn 5:M 1+14etl 3/41-3i�-6�6a �> (/SvrlQ I iSunC /ha.l t tom- 1��` CAv'ZL- tarl•ttgon� Jt��SM t�f 3i4'2L3-96`D� nsQt-f5 &D�nw.t.z� tjie:��NH11v,6 SiSS Mfffit- �4 81 SZ11 M.f�-�h s ;_`1GtrStpT (e � I � S� C� reJ Jr��( •( M• -Sa!C 4wq'Fme(, IN V S%$`j_ S"704 tray lei tvn't 5311 �� 7`0 �,� � r►��o� e s�4 � c y�R�s�,(� 0739-� � �G Lc Qq J U?Q qAe-�6�6,,els S�gaC re Lid �3�-a�� a3 l 57-�6 CWJ01C4s41 t..3`�a; `fg5`� Szpr�s� Ln /FL y-- Packet Pg. 93 9.B.6 m c O N d C Cu J (D Q R 2 LO I- T" LO O) N O O O N O N J d C O r r d d C O N Q Packet Pg. 94 9.B.6 TO-. Collier County Planning Commission and/or Collier County Board of Commissioners SUBJECT: PETITION: PL2021 0002449 —5175 MAPLE LANE REZONE. We hope to communicate our concerns regarding the proposed rezoning of agricultural land at the end of Maple Lane in Naples Florida. We purchased property on Maple Lane with the knowledge there would be no subdivision at the end of the street. Our intention was to raise our two young daughters in a neighborhood similar to our childhood homes. This was a decision based on assessment of both quality of life and safety. This proposed subdivision will change the fundamentals of our neighborhood. This comment is based both on our experience living in our home for 5 years and our attendance at Grady Minor's disappointing neighborhood information session. We understand the motivation and necessity for more housing in Collier County; but this current proposal has bad taste and lacks grace. Frankly, we are insulted by the lack of engagement Grady Minor and their client has had with our community. The proposed development is a poor match for this community and deteriorates our quality of life. Most importantly, our neighborhood has long-standing safety issues that do not add to our confidence in Collier County's ability to manage a SAFE rezoning and subdivision process. Vehicle/pedestrian safety and water management are serious existing issues that have not been adequately considered in this proposed development. If approved, this rezoning changes the conditions in which our family signed up to live. We expect Collier County to maintain or elevate our neighborhood's safety, not detract from it. As parents of a young family, we feel responsible for communicating our safety concerns and expect a similar level of diligence from our government in i addressing these issues. We hope that the re -zoning proposal will be revised to better reflect Collier County's commitment to safety and quality of life. You are welcome to contact us to discuss this topic. Sincerely Myrtle Cove Estate Property Owners and Full Time Naples Residents Dr. Mitchell Ryan Lucas and Dr. Keira Justine Lucas October 28m 2022 1-239-381-0207 5248 Maple Lane Naples, FL 34113 K&ir^a. L4tcew m c 0 N d a� c CU J aD a M 2 LO ti Packet Pg. 95 9.B.6 1 October 29, 2022 To Whom It May Concern: Our property is located at 5302 Maple Lane, Naples, FLorida 34113. We have learned that 5175 Maple Lane located in our neighborhood has presented a plan to establish 16 single family homes on that same street petition number PL20210002449. We have tremendous concerns about (1) The negative impact this project will have on the storm management in our neighborhood. Our street currently has the old storm water system so with every heavy storm we get heavy flooding in our back yard and front swale. Flooding in our neighborhood is already a serious issue. Such a huge increase in the number houses will cause more intense flooding and enormous financial loses in our future. (2) Also, we have a major concern with 16 homes being built will negatively impact the traffic in this neighborhood. Our street, Maple lane is an extremely narrow road and with the addition of 16 homes will make it very difficult for current and future residents to enter and exit the street. The petition owner did not provide a second road option nor does he have a better option as he should have an alternative exit/entry to this proposed developement due to the future of dangerrous/congested traffic. This plot is zoned as agriculture and for it to be rezoned with a density greater than our neighborhood is currently... we believe is very wrong as well as the other neighbors believe this too. We plead and urge the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as the Collier County Board of Commissioners to reject petition number PL20210002449 for the good of our neighborhood, community and future. Thank you for your time and help in this serious matter. Sincerely yours, Steven and Brenda Pricer 5302 Maple Lane, Naples, FL 34113 239-595-2864 Packet Pg. 96 9.B.6 To whom it may concern, I have become aware of the a development of 16 new homes located at 6175 Maple Lane. This neighborhood is not equipped for such a growth in properties With a narrow road way, potential flooding, loss of a quiet and safe surroundings for our children to play, tranquility located in this established neighborhood, and the risk of endangering the wild life plus stray cats we feed. With this development, we as a neighborhood will be losing the main reason we ail bought at this location. We all enjoy this established neighborhood and do not want unnecessary growth here. It will just hurt us and all the reasons listed above why we do not want this development to take place. Please leave us alone. Sincerely, Susan Heitmann 5240 Maple Lane, Napies, FL 34113 239-785-0619 m 0 N d m c J N cv r- r LO Packet Pg. 97 9.B.6 October 21, 2022 To whom It May Concern, My property is located on 5259 Malle Ln Naples I have recently learned that 5175 Maple in has d p tv Presented a plan to establish 16 singlehomes on that same street petition number family PL20210002449. I have impact such a project will have on great concerns about (1) the negative storm water management My street currently has old stone water system with every bad storm I get flooding both in my house and in my backyard Flooding in my neighborhood is already a J major issue it was even featured on wink news. Such a major increase in the number of houses N will cause increase flooding and devastating loses in the future. Pictures of the flooding and CL Wink news article will provide along with this totter. (2) Additionally, major increase in number of homes will natively impact the traffic in the neighborhood. The street has a very narrow road and addition of 16 more homes will make it impossible for current and future residents to enter LO and exit the street. The petition owner did not provide a second road option nor does he have a r good resolution to additional traffic. I cherish our land and our neighborhood for many reasons, first and foremost because of peace and quiet. Addition of 16 single family homes would significantly detract from the peaceful, safe and quiet character of our neighborhood My understanding is that the property in question is currently zoned as agriculture and a zone changing would have to be made by the Planning and Zoning commission before construction can begin. I also understand that ground for denying a request for such request include impact on abutters and others in the neighborhood who would be impacted. Per the petition circulated too document concerns and objection to the zone change and built of 16 single family homes, a large number of concerned citizens oppose to the zone change and the entire project. I urge the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as Collier County Board of Commissioners to reject petition number PL20210002449 for the sake of our neighborhood and community. R Fspectfidly JKubra AkyUZ 5259 Maple In Naples, FL 34113 Tel: 239-200-6342 Please see the link below for proof of flooding for Kubra Akyuz: https://www.winknews.com/2022/06/04/home-floods-in-collier-amid-rains-from-potential-tropical- system/ Packet Pg. 98 9.B.6 Gale Jamison SZg3 Maple LN Naples, MN 34113 October 28, 2022 RE: Petition a PL20210002449- 5175 Maple Lane Rezoning from Agricultural Zoning District to RSF-4 Zoning to allow for establishment of 16 single family residential dwelling units. To Whom It May Concern: As a new owner of a home on the street that would be directly affected by this development, I have many concerns - I. Flooding- is there a plan for flood water mitigation to keep the neighborhood safe from hurricane and heavy rain waters? The street currently has an old storm water system which is prone to flooding. What are the consequences of additional homes in this area? We believe a study should be done before additional building. Also, as a requirement, a minimum two -million -dollar flood fund established by the developer held in trust for 10 years for current owners living on Maple Lane. This fund would be used for any Flood related issues. 2- Traffic issues- the addition of 16 homes is adding an additional neighborhood within a neighborhood! To get to these additional homes, you would need to travel through my neighborhood. Currently the roadway does not allow for even two cars to pass at the same time without one moving over to the side of the road. Imaging the traffic situation with the additional school busses, garbage trucks, delivery trucks, and construction vehicles (probably lasting years). Heavy trucks and construction equipment will surely have tremendous wear and tear on the roads. I would propose that the developer be required to widen the road and add speed bumps to control the traffic. 3. Assessments and loss of existing property- a development of this kind will likely require modifications resulting in assessments to current owners' and possibly loss of land. I am concerned that the current residents will have to bear the brunt of any expense/loss. For example, the necessity to widen the road will take away from owners' property. I would propose that all assessments be paid by the developer. Current owners should not have to pay for any upgrades and should be generously compensated for any lass of land resulting from this project. 4. Noise- We currently have a very quiet neighborhood, and the addition of more homes will change that. The increased traffic and years of construction would affect the peacefulness of our neighborhood. 5. What type of homes are going to be built in the area and how long is this prdject expected to take? Vie want to ensure that our property values are protected. When I purchased this home in August, I was unaware of a possible development. Had I known, my decision to purchase may have been different. I urge the planning and Zoning Commission as well as the Collier County Board of Commissioners to reject petition number PL20210002449 for the sake of this peaceful neighborhood and its residents. Sincerely, Gale Jamison 612-730-3808 Packet Pg. 99 November I st 2022 Subject: 5175 Maple Lane To whom it may concern, We have a property on Maple Lane and we were made aware that the Proprietor of 5175 Maple Lane has presented a plan for a 16 single family home , petition number PL20210002449. We are greatly concerned by this project because of the storm water management_ Our neighborhood is on an old storm water management system. Every big storm we have impacts our backyard with a surplus of water. Not only do we get water in our backyard but other neighbors also get water in their backyard and some of them even in their house. We are also greatly concerned by the influx of cars entering and exiting our residential area this project would mean. Our roads are narrow and there is only one way in and out. This petitioner doesn't give an option to ease this surplus of cars. We have a quiet neighborhood, this project will impact this fact and we fear that the safety in our streets will be impacted as well. In order for this project to be accepted a zoning change will have to be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The 5175 Maple lane is currently zoned as an agriculture area. We also understand that grounds for denying these requests includes impact on abutters and others in the neighborhood who would be impacted. We feel this project would have a negative impact on storm water management and the peacefulness of our residential area_ We urge the Planning and Zoning Conunission and the Collier County Board of Commissioner to deny the PL20210002449 petition for our neighborhood and community. Nycole Grondin and Gunther Berky 5251 Maple Lane Naples, Florida, 34113 Mailing address 85 Domaine du Marais Chambord, Qc, Canada GOW 100 m 0 N d m c c� J N M 2 r LO Packet Pg. 100 9.B.6 0 map- R 2Co _ 20292 W T-L Corgi c,� gl op i S la(-es-rs o oti SZ98 M Ap4e Lo , �JP Oe, kt V eec_sct,.rrX-f glee. ¢ yi4Ai 51-75 MAP\e W 'OAS pRESp-l-liE c P�R4 -To es;� ��;SH lfa �,vjr,)e fw�; lY 4tar�ES. �� '�.�t-� tv U►��9, P�a��l000a`#�i�3 curs �►r K�,e olc S,4tth v.�PYw�d Vict[c+.r¢�! tt; iS V� LAP job iSSOC -�Z)p aue ri2i6�a�t+ars� iN 'Tµ SO r�lu'nP�re tuSrcS w..tll Go cs - 2. �rea�'� c �� -��te ��r 6� t'�o�i-Za�C� - I ►� e s�ee-r �I� �►�� K�5 � .. v Z N; �IZR : P-oPdl Rp'CJ P J CA "—e' L ISO ,uo t M t t s i I >,n F1v 4;, tS AG -{fie CJ >CCZ UJ'f fk�+d -�UTQ r cc uV-oq, T*e R-p-�IEC a QF,-t T crI O?J n, rs- �nr,ou>aA - r,n -rWD �A Q` ;7Uiti #i�Gi�44 s 2 C` C.0 t o '-A 4 1 4\-tT . � �S p�C-4o I 1 SZSS MA? -E "j / pvolj�/ Packet Pg. 101 9.B.6 r Carl and Karen Tisone 5275 Maple Lane Naples, PL. 34113 October 31, 2022 To Whom It May Concern: We are writing to let you know that we share the concerns expressed by many of our neighbors regarding Petition number PL20210002449, requesting permission to build 16 single family homes at the end of Maple Lane. This is not a "plot in my backyard" (NIMBY) objection, but rather based on the increased traffic on a street which is already too narrow for the existing residents, and more importantly, the potential worsening of the flooding which occurs after many of our rainy season storms. The current drainage system is inadequate tc handle normal precipitation pattems and typically results in flooding of neighborhood yards and, in many cases. the homes themselves. We believe any new development in the immediate vicinity should be required to include substantial upgrades to the drainage system. We suggest that opposition to the proposed development could be reduced by any substantive plan to improve drainage and to widen Maple Lane to a more comfortable level for both existing and new residents. Without such a plan, we must object strenuously to approval of this project. Thank you for your serious consideration. Sincerely, 1/7 Carl and Karen Tisone m c 0 N d C R J Q R 2 LO ti LO Packet Pg. 102 9.B.6 LauraDeJohnVEN From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Everyone, SawyerMichael Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:07 PM ScottTrinity; BellowsRay; LauraDeJohnVEN MarcellaJeanne RE: Myrtle Cove Acres I called and talked with Ms. Dangle to discuss her concerns noting that we are in the early stages of our review and will be considering a number of potential developer comments to address some of the neighborhood concerns coming out of the NIM. I let her know she will also have the opportunity to voice her concerns at the CCPC as well as the BCC hearings. She thanked me for reaching out to discuss the issues. Respectfully, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael. sawyerkcolliercountyfl. gov From: ScottTrinity <Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:17 PM To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: MarcellaJeanne <Jeanne.Marcella @colliercountyfLgov> Subject: FW: Myrtle Cove Acres FYI Respectfully, Trinity Scott, Department Head Transportation Management Services Department 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 252-6064 Trinity. Scottkcolliercount�fl..gov m 0 N d N c J N a R LO r L Packet Pg. 103 9.B.6 From: Stephanie Dangler <stephaniespestcontrol@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 1:23 PM To: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay < Ray. Bel lows@colt iercountvfl.gov>; ScottTrinity <Trinity.Scott@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: Re: Myrtle Cove Acres EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon, My Name is Stephanie Dangler I live on Cypress lane, with my husband who has been here for 38 years. I attended the meeting last wednesday at the library regarding our neighborhood Myrtle cove acres. I believe we need to be heard but in an orderly manner. We Are all not happy about the proposed plan.For many reasons I would like to voice my opinions and points and would appreciate being heard.To start I do realize it is inevitable eventually I understand money, growth and development will happen. But in the same breath our community is old and definitely not prepared for this at all. . Of course the obvious, water, run off , drainage , Elevation levels of our homes, flooding and so on. We are all acre and half acre lots which is nice. The chance of foundation cracks which some have suffered from prior developing from the blasting. and of course one of my biggest concerns is traffic. Our streets cannot handle two vehicles passing, Garbage days are nightmares. no sidewalks, no lighting. The most major issue is the Advanced auto A commercial building at the end of my street NO turn lane, They enter and exit on our street. There is no stop sign exiting. We take our life in our own hands to turn it into our development. My son is one of many vehicles that were rear ended. Anddd.. the other entrance on Raintree, a golf cart commercial building along with another commercial building on the other corner being built AGAIN NO turn lane. And you're gonna bring dump trucks in both entrances with no turn lane. We cannot get out as it is, let alone cross to the center to do a U turn. Very dangerous I noticed sunshine Blvd Back side of Treviso Turn Lane and a light. And of course Treviso thas a turn lane and a light. Are we not speaking loud enough or have enough money, Sorry the number of fatalities should not be a requirement But let's add 16 more houses and more traffic. Those numbers may be where they need to be. Unfortunately I'm sorry it's just my opinion. I really do appreciate your time. I am looking forward to hearing from you. Have a Great Day! Stephanie dangler 239-450-1304 On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:18 AM BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colIiercountyfl.gov> wrote: Stephanie, I am the head of the zoning department, focus is on land use. Trinity Scott is our Transportation Department Head. Mike Sent from my iPhone On Feb 25, 2022, at 1:05 PM, Stephanie Dangler <stephaniespestcontrol@gmail.com> wrote: EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you very much is he head of traffic I would like to put an email together Thank You, m 0 N m m c J a� a r L a) v N 0 0 0 N 0 N J d m a a� c 0 N CO) ti 0 M N 0 r r L t d :i m c 0 a m L L 0 U w a r c m E t U 2 r a Packet Pg. 104 9.B.6 Stephanie Dangler/CPO Owner/Pres. Stephanie's Pest Control Inc. 239-450-1304 Now Keller's Pest Control On Feb 25, 2022, at 12:41 PM, BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: m 0 N d Do you want the contact information for Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Division Director? If so, his contact information is as follows: c J N * Phone:252-1006 * E-mail: Michael. Bosi@colIiercountyfl.gov<maiIto: Michael. Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> LO r LO Ray v N Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager c Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section N Growth Management Department J Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 a [cid:image001.png@01D82A44.AB3157B0] Exceeding expectations, every day! m a Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eX*vgT. a� c 0 N CO) ti 00 M From: Stephanie Dangler<stephaniespestcontrol@gmail.com> N Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:45 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov> r Subject: Myrtle Cove Acres m c EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when '00 c opening attachments or clicking links. 0 Good Morning, L We met on Wednesday at the meeting regarding the proposed plans in Myrtle cove Acres may I please have mike o bellows information please v w Thank you, a Stephanie Dangler r c 239-450-1304 5301 Cypress Lane 2 r a Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?Linkld=550986> for Windows 3 Packet Pg. 105 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. m 0 N d N C fC J N R LO r L Packet Pg. 106 9.B.6 LauraDeJohnVEN From: BellowsRay Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 12:33 PM To: tiarra.arthur@gmail.com Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN; SawyerMichael Subject: FW: NIM for Myrtle Cove Rezone Attachments: TrafficVideo.mp4 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon, I will follow-up with the County's Project Planner (Laura DeJohn) for this rezone application to see if the applicant has a timeline to provide a resubmittal to address staff concerns. It should be noted that Laura and I will also be coordinating with the review team to see what can be done to address the concerns (water management and Traffic) mentioned during the NIM. I have also copied Mike Sawyer on this e-mail so he can view the attached video that depicts the traffic on the local roads that is generated outside of normal traffic hours due to rear access they have to Tamiami Court as well as both entrances/exit points to US 41. He will be able to verify if the applicant's Traffic Impact Study appropriately address the existing and projected traffic in this community. Lastly, you are correct, the applicant is required to submit a written summary of the NIM and any commitments that have been made to the assigned planner. Laura will be coordinating with the applicant to obtain the audio and/or video and written transcript that will become part of the record and presented to the Planning Commission and the BCC. Staff will also verify what are the applicable code provisions to help address the concerns raised at the NIM. Please let me know if I can be of any other assistance. R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coi leer Coi4"LY Exceeding expectations, every day! TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eX*vgT. From: Tiarra Arthur <tiarra.arthur@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 11:40 AM m 0 N d N c J N R LO r L a) N O 0 o_ N O N J a c 0 as a c 0 N CO) ti 00 M N r 3 as c as c 0 a m L `o U w a c m E r a Packet Pg. 107 To: David Wallace <naturedave@msn.com>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: NIM for Myrtle Cove Rezone EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Mr. Bellows, Thank you for managing the NIM that occurred on Wednesday. r_ 0 N d I was interested in knowing if Grady Minor {D.Wayne Arnold} has addressed the NIM - It is unclear how many days they have to address their commitments on p. 227 of the Administrative Code for Land Development and when we will expect the sign to be posted? (I copied what I read below - but maybe you can provide more details). J a� Specifically the commitments to the water management/drainage that the entire neighborhood is concerned about, the a ' invasion of privacy issues on the adjacent properties(perpendicular homes overlooking into Mr/Mrs Wilson and Mr/Mrs Arthur), impact on protected species in the area, erosion of roads, management of residential ditches from each street, Ln pump station on Tamiami Court/Maple Lane, safety concerns for impacting of families including sidewalks/proper o v lighting and traffic/road increases onto and from Tamiami Court/Maple/Rain Tree/Cypress Lane. N 0 0 0 **I have attached a video that was actually taken that night on Wednesday upon our return from the NIM. The traffic N assessment that was done is not taking into consideration the businesses that simultaneously use our small J neighborhood roads for their benefit outside of normal traffic hours due to rear access they have to Tamiami Court as a well as both entrances/exit points to US 41. {Autozone, Elks Lodge, Leal's Tire & Wheels, Affordable Carts, and the new o building expansion attached to Leal's). With that being said, the current construction that is already underway with the business development at Raintree will definitely increase the volume hence our concern the traffic assessment was m a biased. A recent publication from Gulfshore Business is stating that a Kava Bar will be going into that plaza and the hours c of operation will be until tam. c 0 N Thank you Ray for your positivity and thoughtful words during the NIM - we all appreciate your dedication to this r, project. M N 00 r r 3 L t d Taken from Collier County Land Development Code - Chapter 8 - Public Notice section B c 1. After a NIM is completed, the applicant will submit a written summary of the NIM and any commitments that have 0 been made to the assigned planner. L These commitments will: o • Become part of the record of the proceedings; v • Be included in the staff report for any subsequent review and approval bodies; and w • Be considered for inclusion in the conditions of approval of any applicable development order. a r c m E Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. r a Packet Pg. 108 9.B.7 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter S E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER QOt—NVY LAND DEVELOPMPZ�T, CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) �,� yrf/`U W V 3800 Via Del Rey SIGNATURE 6F APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me September 22, 2022, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Plannine Technician for O. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me or- Whe-pfedueed as identiAeatien and who 4idMid not take an oath. zPAY � .. GARIN J. DWYER *. t_ MY COMMISSION # GG 982361 = f .4, EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 EOgF ° Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) 7 Signature of NolyfTublic Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public Q Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 109 a Packet Pg. 110 Packet ., ,r a3'&)3 9.B.9 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a.public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on December 13, 2022, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiaml Trail East, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS tOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-4 (RSF-4) ZONING DISTRICT, TO ALLOW UP TO 13 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF UP TO 2.45+/- DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5175 MAPLE LANE, WEST OF THE MYRTLE COVE -ACRES UNIT 1 SUBDIVISION, NORTH OF MAPLE LANE, AND SOUTHWEST OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.3+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20210002449] A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at (239) 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: /s/ Merline Forgue, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-OCIO975970 Of O Z 0 D Z O m m M N N O N N Z a r M H a a Z m 1 Packet Pg. 112 1 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (PL20210002449) Application and Supporting Documents October 20, 2022 CCPC Hearing ® GradyMinor Civf] Fngfneem • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects December 20, 2021 Ms. Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (PL20210002449), Submittal 1 Dear Ms. DeJohn: An application for Public Hearing for a Rezone for properties located at 5175 Maple Lane is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to rezone the 5.3+/- acre parcel from the Agricultural Zoning District to the RSF-4 Zoning District to allow a maximum of 16 single family residential dwelling units. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Standard Rezone Application 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre-app Notes 5. Addressing Checklist 6. Affidavit of Authorization 7. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 8. General Warranty Deed 9. Boundary Survey 10. Recorded Easements 11. Location Map 12. Environmental Data Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 • Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 • LB 0005151 • LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Ms. Laura DeJohn, AICP RE: 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (PL20210002449), Submittal 1 December 20, 2021 Page 2 of 2 13. Traffic Impact Study Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Wolfgang Gilles GradyMinor File (MLRZ-21) Cotlie" r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STANDARD REZONE APPLICATION LDC Section 10.02.08 Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Wolfgang Gilles Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: C/O German Services 3960 Radio Road City: Naples Telephone: 239-213-8614 Cell: E-Mail Address: Jhgnaples@comcast.net Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Firm: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey Telephone: 239-947-1144 Cell: State: FL ZIP: 34104 Fax: City: Bonita Springs state: FL E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Fax: ZIP: 34134 Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is inadequate, attach on separate page: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 30 50 26 Lot: N.A- Block: N.A. Subdivision: Myrtle Cove Extension (unrecorded) Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: 00439520009 09/28/2017 Page 1 of 8 C otlie* Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Size of Property: 357+/- ft. x 677+/- ft. = 230,868+/- Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 5.3+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 5175 Maple Lane ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Treviso Bay PUD Water management area S Treviso Bay PUD ROW, Canal and conservation area E RSF-4 Residential W A Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Section/Township/Range: N.A. / N.A. / N.A. Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: N.A. Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: N.A. REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: A Zoning district(s) to the RSF-4 Present Use of the Property: Residential Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the subject property: Residentia zoning district(s). Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 09/28/217 Page 2 of 8 C otlie* Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ASSOCIATIONS Requirement: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: N.A. Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: City: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.02.08, staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, please provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) when necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 09/28/217 Page 3 of 8 C otlie* Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, art. II], as amended]. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. 09/28/217 Page 4 of 8 C otlie* Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST APPI irANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Wolfgang Gilles Address: C/O German Services 3960 Radio Road City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34104 Telephone: 239-213-8614 Cell: E-Mail Address: jhgnaples@comcast.net Address of Subject Property (If available): 5175 Maples Lane City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34113 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: 30 / 50 / 26 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: Fax: 00439520009 Metes &Bounds Description: See Boundary Survey included with submittal 1 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name:. d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: 16 single family residential dwelling units Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 7280 gpd B. Sewer -Peak: 6000 gpd Average Daily: 5600 gpd Average Daily: 4000 gpd 09/28/217 Page 5 of 8 C Coke* Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 2022 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N.A. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. N.A. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. I PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 09/28/217 Page 6 of 8 Cotl ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Standard Rezone Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre -Application meeting notes 1 ✓ Project Narrative 1 ✓ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Utility Provisions Statement with sketches 1 ✓ ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey Conceptual Site Plan 1 �/ Architectural Rendering ❑ List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 �/ Warranty Deeds 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous 1 Elsurveys Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ❑ ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Statement, with applicable fees 1 School Impact Analysis Application — residential projects only 1 ✓ Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 ✓ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement If located in RFMU (Rural Frinee Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." 09/28/217 Page 7 of 8 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: Bays hore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Other: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting will be required) Rezone Petition (regular): $6,000.00 plus $25.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 5t" and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $750.00 Listed/Protected Species Survey: $1,000.00 Estimated Legal Advertising: o CCPC- $1,125.00 o BCC- $500.00 Transportation Fee: o Methodology Review: $500.00 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) School Concurrency Review: If required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 D. Waye D. Wayne Arnold Datleally 021.12.13sinedy14: 516n05'00'Id Agent/Owner Signature D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 12/13/2021 Date Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 09/28/217 Page 8 of 8 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (PL20210002449) Conditions of Approval 1. No project access via Raintree Lane. Access will be via Maple Lane. 2. A maximum of 13 single family lots may be developed on the property. 3. The project's surface water management system will be designed to a 25 year/3-day storm event and will be designed to discharge south of the County's drainage control structure. Please see conceptual Water Management Plan Exhibit. 4. The maximum total daily trip generation for this project shall not exceed 15 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. July 12, 2022 ® GradyMinor Page 1 of 1 Conditions of Approval-r2.docx Chit Emgfneers • band Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-] 144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com I I I \ I \ \ I \ ` I \ ` I \ \I \ \I \ r � I \ 1 I I I\ I I \ \ I I \ II I \ \ I \ I I 1 I I II I II L_ I I ° I CS-1 -- ----- - - ----- ----- I -- I I I I I ---------- ------�--I—T I I I I OUT FALL STRUCTURE k WATER MANAGEMENT AREA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I II II I II w Q ZE- Z 1 1 I I I I I II II II v a a • I I I i I I I II II I N S >- N I I I I I I I I I I IIwm w 1 1 I I I I II II I 1 1 I I I I I I II I I EX. DE I I — — — loo,I 1 1 I I I II II I I I - - - - - - - - - - - TRACT 'R' - - - - - - - - - � I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I Lu z I I II I I I I I I aI l II I I I TRACT 'A' I I a 1 I I I I 9 10 11 12 13 li li I I I I I i li I I I '� I I I ► I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I ', I I I � I I - - - - - - - - - - - — I I i I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4- MAPLE LANE GradyMinor 4 CONCEPT WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 0 15' 30' 60' Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors Q 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' Planners • Landscape Architects wwiv, Grnd,yMinor. com a- N N O N 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (PL20210002449) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC section 10.02.08, staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. NarrativA- The applicant is proposing to rezone a 5.3+/- acre parcel of land from A, Agriculture to the RSF- 4 zoning district. The rezoning to RSF-4 is logical as it is the adjacent zoning district and will result in single family residential development at a scale consistent with other property located on Maple Lane. No more than 16 units will be developed on the property. No deviations or variance from the RSF-4 zoning district are necessary in order to the develop the proposed single-family residences. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan. The property is located in the Urban Mixed Use Residential District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Collier County Future Land Use Map. This subdistrict permits residential development not to exceed a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre. However, because the property is located in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), the Future Land Use Element density rating system restricts density to a maximum of 3 du/ac. The proposed conventional rezoning to the RSF-4 zoning district would permit a maximum of 16 dwelling units at the maximum three (3) unit per acre density. The applicant has limited the application to a maximum of 16 single family residential dwelling units; therefore, the density is consistent with that permitted in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and CHHA. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.3 requires all rezonings to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The proposed rezoning to the RSF-4 zoning district is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The property is located in the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map. The property is also located within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The property is eligible for up to 3 dwelling units per acre because of the CHHA designation. The 5.3+/- acre property is eligible to obtain a maximum of 16 dwelling units (5.3x3=15.9 (16) and is consistent with the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and CHHA density. Policy 5.6 indicates that new development shall be compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed RSF-4 zoning designation permits single family dwelling units. Surrounding properties to the north, east and south are also single-family homes and also zoned RSF-4. The property immediately to the west is a 5+/- agriculturally zoned parcel and has been developed with a single-family residence. The proposed single-family homes March 30, 2022 W Grady.N inor Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx Page 1 of 5 CIvII Engineers • band Svrvcyors • 111annces • Landscape Archttccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com are compatible with the surrounding properties and are complementary in that the agriculturally zoned property has been most recently utilized as a construction debris and landscape nursery operation. The proposed single-family use is complementary to the surrounding single-family homes. Policies 7.1-7.4 encourage development to provide interconnected streets in order to reduce congestion on nearby collector streets. The subject property has legal access to Maple Lane and is not contiguous to any other local or collector street. Because the properties immediately to the east and west are developed with individual homes, it is not feasible to provide an interconnection at these locations. To the north is the gated Treviso Bay community and the subject property is separated from the community by the County's LASIP canal system. Crossing this canal is not feasible and accessing a separate gated community is not possible. Due to the sized of the project, there are no opportunities for multiple dwelling unit types. The resulting subdivision will have sidewalks on both sides of the local street. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1 requires projects greater than 2.5 acres in size, when located within the CHHA, to provide a minimum of 25% native vegetation preservation. The site was cleared decades ago and utilized for a commercial/wholesale nursery. The site has scattered native trees which appear to have been planted in support of the nursery operation. Because there is no native vegetative community on the property and was previously cleared, the project is exempt from the native vegetation standard. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property is an active landscape nursery and operates under the name, Emerald Landscaping. The site has been utilized for the landscape nursery business since the early 1980's. The property immediately to the east is zoned RSF-4, and the pattern of development along Maple Lane is single family dwelling units, consistent with that proposed. Property to the south across Maple Lane is a preservation area that is part of the Treviso Bay PUD. Land to the north is a man-made lake, also part of the Treviso Bay PUD. Land immediately to the west is an agriculturally zoned property and is developed with a single-family residence and outbuilding. The proposed RSF-4 zoning which permits single family dwellings is consistent with the nearby development pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The rezoning to RSF-4 does not create an isolated district. The adjacent property to the east is also zoned RSF-4. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. March 30, 2022 Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx Page 2 of 5 The existing zoning district boundaries are not illogically drawn; however, the property is within the Urban designated area of Collier County and permits conversion of agriculturally zoned land to urban intensities as proposed by the RSF-4 zoning district. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) when necessary. In order to develop the site as a residential subdivision consistent with the Future Land Use Element, a rezoning is required. It is increasingly difficult to find undeveloped sites suitable for smaller residential subdivisions. The RSF-4 zoning district is consistent with the surrounding land use pattern. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The zoning change to the RSF-4 zoning district will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood. The area has urban infrastructure including water and sewer available. The resulting subdivision will have a maximum of 16 single family homes and will be of similar scale to other development which has been developed in the Maple Lane area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. A traffic analysis has been prepared in support of the application and concludes that no level of service impacts result from the development of up to 16 single family residences. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Development of the site for up to 16 single family residences will not create any drainage problems. The property will need to obtain a permit from the South Florida Water Management District, and the site will be developed with an on -site surface water management system and water discharges from the site will occur at the County's regulated basin discharge rate. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development of the site with the proposed single-family residences will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. March 30, 2022 Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx Page 3 of 5 Development of the site with residential dwelling units consistent with other residential dwellings in the area will not adversely impact property values in the area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Development of the site with single family residences will not be a deterrent to improvement or development of other property in the area. Discontinuing use of the site as a commercial landscape nursery and development of a small residential subdivision will have a positive impact for the surrounding area. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Approval of a rezoning to the RSF-4 zoning district does not constitute granting of a special privilege to the owner. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the LDC criteria for rezoning property. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning is A, Agriculture. In order to develop the site at urban density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the rezoning is required. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed change is in scale with the surrounding property. Developed property to the west along Maple Lane is also zoned RSF-4. The proposed 16 lot single family subdivision is in keeping with the scale of surrounding properties. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other sites in Collier County that would support the proposed 16 lot subdivision; however, the site does have potable water and sewer service available and is a logical conversion of the existing agricultural use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. March 30, 2022 Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx Page 4 of 5 The site is well -suited for conversion to a residential subdivision. The stie has been altered over time for use as a commercial landscape nursery operation. Much of the site has been previously cleared; therefore, no extensive site work will be required. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, art. II], as amended]. The development of up to 16 homes under the proposed RSF-4 zoning will not have any negative impacts with regard to availability of public facilities and Level of Service Standards. The County has no level of service capacity issues for water or sewer treatment, and there are no roadway deficiencies associated with the proposed zoning change. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The rezoning of the site is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and it will result in a use comparable to existing residential development in the surrounding area. March 30, 2022 Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx Page 5 of 5 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Rezone (RZ) DateandTime: Wednesday 10/13/21 - 1:30 PM -SKYPE Assigned Planner: Laura DeJohn Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ ) PL#: 20210002449 PropertylD#: 00439520009 Current Zoning: Agricultural (A) Project Address: 5175 Maple LaneCity; Naples State: FL Zip: 34113 Applicant: Sharon Umpenhour Agent Name: D . Wayne Arnold, AICP Phone: 947-1144 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Naples FL 34134 Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Wolfgang Giles Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 5.32 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 1 of 5 CoT:r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and vour associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note —link is https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 6_e_ p2A. emxlC N0774& L'he:c k/-)s r d 4 61'L P i r14a), ,,,, J' l./J�LrI/G if i�iLR/�� !T�% �i �!%CAN 7QcaZ Q11iliLiL 1Vv4 E�'S 75 oC If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(d,)naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland (a)naplesgov corn Robin Singer RSinger(a)naolesgov.corn Erica Martin emartin(cDnaDlesgov.com Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: LauraDeJohnVEN Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 5:26 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre app notes: 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ or PUDZ) - PL20210002449 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Agent intends to rezone from A to RSF-4 (same district as adjoining Myrtle Cove Acres subdivision). Applicant may opt to rezone from A to RPUD if deviations are needed. Both application forms/checklists are provided for pre-app purposes. Agent will determine access to property and provide proof of legal access. Maximum density in CHHA / Urban Coastal Fringe to be determined with comp planning staff. To address compatibility with Myrtle Cove Acres, show the proposed lot layout and any proposed buffer(s). Provide this information in time for the Neighborhood Info Meeting. NIM is required, followed by CCPC and BCC hearings. Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239) 252-5587 laura.dejohnCa colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. PA(9- E: a. 4. ThomasClarkeVEN From: FaulknerSue Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 5:58 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN; SaboJames Subject: PL20210002449 Pre-app for Maple Lane RZ Attachments: FW GIS Determination-GSD-20400 5175.pdf, PL20210002449 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ).pdf, CHHA Map Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Hi Thomas, Here are pre-app notes for the pre-app meeting for Maple Lane PL20210002449. CCJ�.i�nd JR.e�a�.,rnrn C�Jue e�au.�c�rw.c, Jti�ui�u.� C Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Sue.Faulkner@colliercountvfl.gov phone:239-252-5715; E-fax:239-252-2838 �A r "'tA V'WWER Mom MIX v w Website: www.colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Motto: "To exceed expectations." Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. _?1.1 6�'a . R l Corer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliereov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. Comp Planning: Pre-app meeting was held at 1:30 PM on October 13, 2021. PL20210002449 — Maple Lane Rezone (RZ). The subject site (parcel # 439520009) is 5.32 acres and is currently partially developed. The subject site adjoins Wentworth Estates, east of Tamiami Trail Eastbound. The Future Land Use Element designates this site as Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict as shown on Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The Urban Coastal Fringe would allow up to a maximum of 4 DUs/acre. However; the site is also designated to lie within the CHHA, Coastal High Hazard Area, which reduces the density to only be allowed 3 DUs/acre. Staff has attached an email with a map confirming that the subject site is within the CHHA and text message from Collier County GIS. Also attached is the There appears to be constraint on a road connection to Tamiami Trail East (US41). The applicant wishes to do a conventional rezone from A, Agricultural Zoning District to RSF-4 Zoning District. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sue Faulkner, Comprehensive Planning Principal Planner 10/14/2021 Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. "q, G, a. Updated 7/24/2018 Page I 2Fef'5 Beth Yang commented: ■ RAT Parcel#439520009 O 41 ,.- 0 ''ROOKERY BAY L ,NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE w IM 7 PA L-, 2., 3, * 3. I Property is within CHHA. on GSD-20400. Would you be able to determine if 5175 Maple Lane, Naples- Folio Number00439520009 is located within or outside of the CHHA. We have a Pre-App meeting scheduled for next week. Would you be able to determine if 5175 Maple Lane, Naples- Folio Number00439520009 is located within or outside of the CHHA. We have a Pre-App meeting scheduled for next week. See Michele's concern below: email from Michele: For your awareness, the subject rezone may or may not qualify for RSF-4 zoning. The property is within the "generalized" boundary of the Coastal High Hazzard Area (CHHA) on the FLUM. Staff will likely need GIS assistance to determine if the property is located within or outside of the CHHA. Properties within the CHHA are subject to a reduction in density of 1 DU/A. Further, it's unclear from the pre -application meeting information if the applicant is proposing an AH bonus to increase density from 3 DU/A to 4 DU/A, if the property is located within the CHHA. Respectfully, Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner If you have questions about or would like to see the full details of the request please use the 'View Request' link below. There you will be able to see all of the request's details and submit comments to the team. Jason Regula changed the status to Waiting for customer. View request • Turn off this request's notifications This is shared with Thomas Clarke, Michele Mosca, William Fowler, and 2 other people. This email was automatically generated. Please do not respond directly to this email. Powered by Jira Service Desk Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. '? , 3, , ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 4:38 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App RESEARCH for 5175 Maple Lane Rezone(RZ) - PL20210002449- Wednesday 10/13/21 at 1:30PM - SKYPE Attachments: Straight Rezone checklist.doc Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas, Here are my notes for this rezone. Without a MCP Rezone without a Master Concept Plan, I only need a FLUCFCS Map of the property the rest can be provided at Development order time. Check the box for FLUCFCS Map only. (No fee) ES Staff will conduct a site visit at the first submittal to determine if a listed species survey will be needed for the SDP. With a MCP If a Master Concept Plan is provided the preservation requirement will be 25% of the native vegetation. A tree survey may be needed to calculate the preservation requirement if native trees are present onsite. ES Staff will conduct a site visit at the first submittal to determine if a listed species survey will be needed. The property appears to have been cleared of some vegetation please provide a narrative to explain the clearing ie permitted or cleared historically, no preservation is required add a note to the master concept plan "No Preservation required." Craig Brown Senior Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@ col liercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 12:03 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beardl-aurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown @colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@col liercountyfl.gov>; CastroGabriela <Gabrie Ia. Castro@ col liercountyfl.gov>; MedinaJosephine <Josephine.Medina @colliercountyfl.gov>; MoscaMichele <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard Straight Rezone Checklist 144. Is project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties. (i.e. CON, ST, PUD, RLSA designation, RFMU district, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05- 2.03.08; 4.08.00) land use Compliance 147. Comply with specific requirements per SSA stewardship easement. (LDC 4.08.06) �,'A compliance 148. Comply with specific requirements per SRA development document/master plan. (LDC 4.08.07) MC4' 203. Submit a current aerial photograph and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay or vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation. (LDC 10.08.00.B.6) hl_UCC'S ac, ,1 �� 150. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). preserves labeled 151. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-1); 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). preserve calculation 204. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H. Le. 154. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) preserve selection 208. Provide the justification for proposing a created preserve versus retaining existing native vegetation. (LDC 3.05.07.H.l.e.i) 210. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross - sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) preserve setback 211. Provide the location, maintenance plan, and type of habitat of any proposed off -site preservation/mitigation. (LDC 3.05.07.F.4) 115. Wetland line shall be approved by SFWMD and delineated on the site plan. Provide wetland permits from the applicable agencies. (LDC 3.05.07.17; 10.02.03.B.1 j.) wetland line 128. Wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall provide an assessment of the value and function of the onsite wetlands (WRAP score). Direct impacts of development shall be directed away from high quality wetlands. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3.a) wetland assessment 127. Wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system being utilized by listed species, serving as wildlife corridors and existing wetland flow ways shall be preserved onsite, even if by doing so exceeds the required preservation acreage. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3.b-c) wetland impacts 212. Wetland preserves within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall have a vegetated (existing or planted) upland buffer located landward from the approved jurisdictional line. Provide planting plan and plant list if supplemental planting is required. (LDC 3.05.07.17.3.f) wetland buffer 126. All direct impacts to wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall be mitigated. Provide a mitigation assessment. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3-4) wetland mitigation 130. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and the ACSC. If wetland impacts are proposed, provide a map identifying the wetland assessment scores of each wetland on -site. The preservation requirement shall be met first with wetlands with a score of 0.65 or greater (based on SFWMD methods). Provide agency approved wetland score documentation. (LDC 4.08.05.M.1.) RLSA wetland assessment 129. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and the ACSC. Wetlands being utilized by listed species or serving as wildlife corridors shall be preserved onsite, even if by doing so exceeds the required preservation acreage. (LDC 4.08.08.H.2.) RLSA wetlands 213. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and the ACSC. Wetland preserves shall have a vegetated (existing or planted) upland buffer located landward from the approved jurisdictional line. Provide planting plan and plant list for supplemental planting. (LDC 4.08.08.H.7.) RLSA buffer 131. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside ofMs, HSAs, WRAs and the ACSC. Direct impacts to wetlands, shall be mitigated for. Provide a mitigation assessment. The wetland functional score of the mitigation must equal or exceed that of the impacted wetlands. Demonstrate that there's no net loss of wetland functions. Priority shall be given to mitigation within FSAs and HSAs. These mitigation requirements must be satisfied prior to site plan approval. (LDC 4.08.08.H.8-9.) RLSA mitigation 153. Provide a complete and sufficient EIS (and the review fee) identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 10.02.02) EIS required 152. Provide a wildlife survey and include the species specific wildlife habitat management plan on the site plan. The management plan shall include a monitoring program for sites larger than 10 acres. (LDC 3.04.00) species survey & management Additional Comments: Stipulations for approval (Conditions) ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Thomas, AshtonHeidi Wednesday, October 13, 2021 1:57 PM ThomasClarkeVEN LauraDeJohnVEN RE: Pre-App RESEARCH for 5175 Maple Lane Rezone(RZ) - PL20210002449- Wednesday 10/13/21 at 1:30PM - SKYPE Follow up Completed Please add to the pre-app notes: Please provide copies of the easements that demonstrate legal access from US 41 to the subject property. Thank you! ht WL Aslhtov.-CLcleo MawagLK,g ,4ssLstawt Cokwt� AttorKt O f fice Of the Cokwtd ,4ttorwed 2200 North htorseshoe DyWe, sk%te 3o2 Naples, FL 341.04 (239) 252-9773 From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 12:03 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beard Laurie <Lau rie.Bea rd @col liercou ntyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@ colliercountyfl.gov>; OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@colliercountyfl.gov>; MedinaJosephine <Josephine.Medina @colliercountyfl.gov>; MoscaMichele <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; PollarclBrandi <Brandi.Pollard @colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; ColeTabatha <Tabatha.Cole@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov>; YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@col►iercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre-App RESEARCH for 5175 Maple Lane Rezone(RZ) - PL20210002449- Wednesday 10/13/21 at 1:30PM - SKYPE Good Morning All, Please review the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for 5175 Maple Lane Rezone(RZ) - PL20210002449. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes gw — S.-.- EmA4L- � ' - i�,�r, 3 4 CGr4IL S — lVc�t`rt5 Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 1:46 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: Pre app for Maple Lane Rezone Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas, Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist as well as methodology on the next page with a note that methodology will be by email to staff. Please also add the following notes: Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting bar email required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of Rezone/PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Respectfully, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawyer(nacolliercountyfl.ov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. ThomasClarkeVEN From: OrthRichard Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 12:20 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting 5175 PL20210002449 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ) La u ra, Yes, I reviewed this project and am familiar with the property as it relates to stormwater. Please include the following comments to the pre -application notes. 1) Please provide a stormwater management plan that identifies the stormwater discharge rate and outfall location. 2) No encroachment into the LASIP stormwater management easements will be allowed. 3) The project is located within the Lely Manor Canal Basin with a discharge rate of 0.06 cfs/ac. 4) Please contact me at 239-252-5092 or rchard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov with any stormwater related questions. Rick Orth Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Ste 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-252-5092, Cellular 239-276-3085 RicharclOrth@CollierGov.Net From: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 8:16 AM To: OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting 5175 PL20210002449 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ) Rick, We had a pre app yesterday for a rezone to allow a potential single family subdivision on the 5 acre parcel shown below. I just wanted to check in with you to ask if you want to add any comments to the pre-app notes because this is close to County LASIP.... If you want to email any comments, we can include. If not, that's fine. Thanks, Laura Planner: Laura DeJohn Fire District: Greater Naples Fire .......................................................................................... �("iE 3,R, ThomasClarkeVEN From: FeyEric Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2021 10:03 AM To: jhgnaples@comcast.net Cc: Utility Planning; WasteWaterEngineering Subject: Maple Lane - Sewer Attachments: Maple LN.pdf Jim, The attached sewer as -built shows that the terminal manhole on Maple Lane is 8 feet deep. So, you should not have any issue extending gravity service to your project. The sewer on Maple Lane discharges to a county pump station (300.21), as shown in the GIS screen shot below: ? 7 -" 520 7521 Raintree,'''_ s LN wSystemValve_�0015 16 — n 5202 5216 520a mi" M 5224 VIA l` 9 1 5210 5227 1:1 17 5ystemValve_0015620 wSystteein alve_U020950 ' 4 8"� .rGM 7�19- . .P, ' w sMarthal �O�3 Q3975 Maple t..N - w5; ste,„Valve 0035023 1200 �520 -621 G L 1 As discussed, you will need to send an email to Wastewater Engineering (WasteWaterEngineering colliercountyfl.gov) requesting confirmation of downstream wastewater collection system capacity. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager Co 1ee-r C014nty Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous Improvement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survev ThomasClarkeVEN From: FeyEric Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 5:28 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting 5175 PL20210002449 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ) Attachments: Maple Lane - Sewer; RE: Myrtle Cove Acres - Water Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas, Please attach my attached correspondence to the pre -application meeting notes. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager CO 7eY C0144 .ty Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous Improvement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey -----Original Appointment ----- From: Pre -Application Meetings <PreApplicationMeetings@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 20214:04 PM To: Pre -Application Meetings; Sharon Umpenhour; LauraDeJohnVEN; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart -Taylor; AnthonyDavid; ArnoldMichelle; AshkarSally; AshtonHeidi; Beard Laurie; BeddowShar; BosiMichael; Brad Jackson; BrownCraig; BullertBenjamin; CascioGeorge; CastroGabriela; ChachereKatherine; ColeTabatha; CookJaime; CrotteauKathynell; Daniel Zunzunegui; David Ogilvie; DeleonOmar; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FinnTimothy; ForesterDebrah; GewirtzStorm; GibbonsMichael; GiblinCormac; GosselinLiz; GrantKimberley; GundlachNancy; HumphriesAlicia; JacobLisa; JenkinsAnita; JohnHouldsworthVEN; JohnsonEric; KellyJohn; KurtzGerald; LevyMichael; LintzSean; LulichPamela; LynchDiane; MargaritaAcevedoVEN; MastrobertoThomas; McKennaJack; McLeanMatthew; MedinaJosephine; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; NicholsonJoanna; NuteMelissa; OrthRichard; OrtmanEric; PadronAilyn; PajerCraig; PattersonAmy; PerryDerek; PochmaraNatalie; PollarclBrandi; RodriguezWanda; RoeDavid; RosenblumBrett; SaboJames; Saieva Charity; Santa barbaraGino; SawyerMichael; SchmidtCorby; ScottTami; Sean Lintz; Shar Beddow; ShawinskyPeter; Shawn Hanson; SheaBarbara; ShowalterAlexander; SimmonsLinda; StrainMark; SweetChad; TempletonMark; ThomasClarkeVEN; ThomasConsuela; VargaCecilia; WalshJonathan; WilkieKirsten; WilloughbyChristine; ZunzuneguiDaniel Subject: Pre Application Meeting 5175 PL20210002449 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ) e, 3. ThomasClarkeVEN From: LibbyPamela Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2021 2:30 PM To: FeyEric; jhgnaples@comcast.net Cc: Utility Planning Subject: RE: Myrtle Cove Acres - Water Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed We confirmed the 6" main ends at Valve 35023 and then just a 2" service goes towards 5151 Maple Lane. We cannot find any additional as-builts for this extension — it might have just been in-house at some point years ago that the main was extended. Respectfully, Pamela Libby Water Distribution Manager (239) 253-0215 Collier County From: FeyEric Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:58 AM To: jhgnaples@comcast.net Cc: LibbyPamela ; Utility Planning Subject: Myrtle Cove Acres - Water Jim, The attached record drawing for the 6" asbestos cement (AC) water main on Maple Lane shows a termination at the cul- de-sac, but our GIS shows the main extending along the north side of the private drive to serve 5151 Maple LN: �. 5151 517 u �— vSystemValve 001562" v- 1 'NSyst F` f Map�.L� '�w5ystemValve=0035023 ff --_._ 5200 5208 r. _r I am unable to find a record drawing for the water main extension. So, I am copying Water Distribution Manager Pam Libby to see if she can provide this to you. I will send you the sewer record drawing separately. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. N ThomasClarkeVEN From: TempletonMark Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 2:55 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: PL20210002449 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ) Thomas, Below are my comments for the above pre-app. Landscape: Label buffers on the master plan. North labeled as "per LDC'; 10' Type A buffers along the other 3 sides. Respectfully, Mark Templeton, RLA Principal Planner/Landscape Review C;O 7eY C014nty Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day! NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2475 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this email is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -�R'_ --,,>,i�' Cover County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20210002449 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard @coiliercountyfLgov IV Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov �� ►' Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@ col liercountyfLgov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov / P Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aIicia.humph ries@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf Zoning Senior Planner 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ omas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 CoTer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov AJ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Josie Medina Comp Plan -Principal Planner 252-2306 Josephine.Medina@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov Eric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Michael Sawyer Comp Planning Manager Transportation Planning 252-2708 252-2926 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov kr Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email 4&X*L k . Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 CbAc cofvy County Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20210002449 — 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (RZ) Planner: Laura DeJohn Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Umpenhour • Agent to list for PL# D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) 00439520009 — Wolfgang Giles • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone) Rezone • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): • Details about Project: Rezone from the Agricultural Zoning District to RSF-4 Zoning District. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Sharon Umpenhour Title: Senior Planning Technician Email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Phone: 239-947-1144 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas -Client Services Supervisor Consuela.Thomas(@colliercountyfl.gov Phone:239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zonng Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drove • Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 • www.colkergov.net cower County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the n. C. ercenLaKe Ui sucn interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership I If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the lercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the e1Le11Laxe vi 1111.eresL: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net e f 9. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the eneral and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the [! 'I IIt.CI J, JIUl,R11U1 UCI --�, UCI ICI ILIdl ICJ, UI Pdl tl ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of Date subject property acquired �, U1 11 Uhl. Name and Address ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 CoTer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net Date of option: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 (j�ilU�✓ � The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre -Application meeting notes 1 Project Narrative 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Utility Provisions Statement with sketches 1 ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey 1 Conceptual Site Plan --hC 1 Architectural Rendering List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Warranty Deeds 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Listed Species Survey; less an 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 1 ❑ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ❑ ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Traffic Impact Statement, with applicable fees—&4zecl-en #,r.Scan i7T11-L— 1 School Impact Analysis Application — residential projects only 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." 09/28/217 Page 7 of 8 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 l7rY'r Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be ro eu d o the following additional reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ I Other: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting will be required) Rezone Petition (regular): $6,000.00 plus $25.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 51h and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $750.00 ❑ Listed/Protected Species Survey: $1,000.00 Estimated Legal Advertising: o CCPC- $1,125.00 o BCC- $500.00 Transportation Fee: "7'3yF'"'a'� -re sT�Fr— Methodology Review: $500.00 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) School Concurrency Review: If required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 09/28/217 Page 8 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercou nty.gov Co*,r County 0PT1vx-, J. ecluirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- h. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code men ment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/`ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑, Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. .— �� P�.¢ /�;?'�/Uct ❑ ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study — Fps C''t4' cY-°4 4-rrni.zor: �;u ,lraL- 1 [� ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ �{ �I ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Coe.r County -0000 aP_11 01101_� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT- 6 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov � �e,C (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 R , /7_ S R i Conceptual Master Site Plan 2 Wl" - py- ❑ ❑ Original `PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ® ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification If C(I(a 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses —�r Exhibit B: Development Standards ,ff // � Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code � Exhibit D: Legal Description t < Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each 'S,/ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ I City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: 01 City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 >� PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 `1 Transportation Review Fees: Methodology Review: $500.00—Ke4r,411140 6-f`e""- Tv S;Ate *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. 01 o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Cot?, County a a 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5t' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD—Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) 0 CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) S30, T50, R26 (see attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00439520009 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 5175 Maple Lane • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 s Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: E Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Phone: 239-947-1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00439520009 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number O�� / / 10/19/2021 Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BF UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 5175 Site Zone Parcel No 00439520009 Address MAPLE LN Site City NAPLES *Note 34113 *Disclaimer Map No. Strap No. Section Town hip Range Acres *Estimated 51330 1 000100 003 5B30 30 1 50 1 26 1 5.32 30 50 26 FROM N COR OF S1/2 SEC RUN E ALG N LI OF S1/2 4505.99FT TO POB, CON E 357.93FT TO NE COR OF S1/2 OF SEC ALSO N COR OF MYRTLET COVE ACRES, UNIT 1 S ALG W LI MYRTLE COVE UNIT 1 677.05FT, W 329.47FT, N 673.75FT TO POB Millage Area O 17 1 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code O 169 - ORNAMENTALS, MISC AGRICULTURAL 1 4.889 1 6.5335 1 11.4225 Latest Sales History 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subiect to Change) Date Book -Page Amount 08/25/21 6006-3092 $ 675,000 04/09/21 5957-219 $ 0 10/31/19 5698-3756 $ 0 07/05/06 4066-568 $ 0 09/11/02 3107-1950 $ 335,000 06/10/02 3052-2323 $ 0 06/20/94 1959-1196 $ 0 03/01/73 515-855 $ 0 +� Land Value Improved Value $ 585,200 $ 99,692 (_) Market Value $ 684,892 (-) 10% Cap $ 239,292 (_) Assessed Value $ 445,600 (_) School Taxable Value $ 604,110 (_) Taxable Value $ 364.818 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site 5175 Site Zone Parcel No 00439520009 Address MAPLE LN Site City NAPLES *Note 34113 *Disclaimer Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20210002449 1, W011gangGllles (print name), as NA (title, if applicable) of N.A. (company, If a plicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner=✓ applicant=contract purchaserr9and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 55, Well authorize O. Grady Minor& Assodates, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the Corp, pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the facts stated 'n it are true. Signature the foregoing Affidavit of Artthoriaation and 4hat STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or day of #QPXJ&-n 20 21 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Wolfgang Gilles Suc erson(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me C1 Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced ®� as identification. Notary Signature: Date ®online notarization this �'lpYCommleslontl 0980531 S pIfes August Ill, 2024 <added ft Troy Fain 9gatence80 W7019 �. • CP\08-COA-00115�155 I2EY 3/42020 C o i e* r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address % of Ownership Wolfgang Gilles, C/O German Services, 3960 Radio Rd, #208 100 Naples, FL 34104 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership 1►A_11 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership ( Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 C o i e* r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the aanaral anal/nr limitarl nartnarc- Name and Address I % of Ownership N.A. e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the c� I I IL.CI J, JLUL.RI IUIUCI J, UCI ICI IL.IQI ICJ, UI PCII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: N.A. lid f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers. if a comoration. DartnershiD. or trust: [* Name and Address N.A. Date subject property acquired 08/2021 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 C o i e* r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Wayne D. Wayne Arnold Datle,tally 20sined2g11.08y1D1: 520 05'00'Id Agent/Owner Signature D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) 11 /08/2021 Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 INSTR 6122523 OR 6006 PG 3092 E-RECORDED 9/2/2021 9:47 AM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $4,725.00 REC $27.00 CONS $675,000.00 This instrument prepared by: James A. Pilon, Esq. Siesky & Pilon - James A. Pilon, P.A. 2800 Davis Blvd, Suite 205 Naples, FL 34104 Consideration: $675,000.00 General Warranty Deed Made this l�day of August, 2021 by Peter Iaconelli and Robin Iaconelli, husband and wife, individually add as Trustees of the Peter Iaconelli Revocable Trust, dated February 26,199$;• se host office address is 129 3rd Street, Naples, FL 34113, hereinafter called the grantor, to Wo ,jfeafig Gilles, whose post office address is c/o German Services, 3960 Radio Road, Unit 208,`aples, FL 34104, hereinafter called the grantee (Whenever used herein tie term "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of E tions) WITNESSETH: that the grantor, fbf' ($10.00), and other valuable considerai grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises,`: certain land situated in Collier County, See attached Exhibit "A" Parcel ID Number: 00439520009 Together with all the tenements, in anywise appertaining. consideration of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars eceipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby s,`` conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the gv said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful alihl said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said lar encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to 12/31/2020 and su restrictions, reservations of record common to the subdivision. thereto belonging or is lawfully seized of to sell and convey 11 defend the same -e eof all OR 6006 PG 3093 In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed Witness #1 Print Name in Our Presence: as to both 1CGrau Ratntre- Z Print Name State of Florida County of Collier Peter Iaconelli, individually and as Trustee of the Peter Iaconelli Revocable Trust, dated February 26,1998 M- Me M. I , M. 0 4 M i Iaconelli, individually and as Trustee of the Iaconelli Revocable Trust, dated February 98 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means- [ ] online notarization, this day of August, 2021 by Pets Iaconelli, individually and as Trustees of the Peter Iaconelli Revocabl 1998 who are [K-] personally known to me or who have [ ] produced as identification.. E 0 Notary Public State of Flonda ? Gregory A PerrinoMy Commission GG 161664 a Expires 1112612021 (Notary Seal or Stamp) Notary'Public i Print Name: Caa My Commission FA sical presence or .li and Robin lated February 26, *** OR 6006 PG 3094 *** TRACT NO. SECTION 30 CONCRETE SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP THE NORTH LINE OF SA BEGINNING OF THE LAI Exhibit A TION TO MYRTLE COVE ACRES IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM A THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF RANGE 26 EAST, RUN NORTH 87016'20" EAST ALONG )N OF A SECTION FOR 4,505.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF Y CONVEYED; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING CONTINUE NORTH 87016'20" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 357.93 FEET MORE OR O HE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, WHICH CORNER IS Also I IE 4ORTHWEST CORNER OF UNIT NO. 1, MYRTLE COVE ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE P T THEREOF, OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 3 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER C TY� FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 2°45'40" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOU 12 F SECTION 30 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID UNIT NO. 1, MYRTLE COVE ACRES FOR 67�, 5 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87-28-30" WEST FOR 329.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO AN ERS-ECTION WITH A LINE THROUGH THE POINT OF BEGINNING PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST I& OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30; THENCE RUN NORTH 0121'40" EAST ALONG SA PARALLEL LINE FOR 673.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AN EASEME T'FOk DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER AND ACCROSS THE NORTH 50 FEET AND THE EAST 3 FT , i REOF; SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPO- 60 FEET WIDE OVER AND ALONG THAT CERTAIN ROADWAY EASEMENT AS DESCRIBE NO CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED IN OR BOOK 87, PAGES 267 AND 268, OF THE PUBLC RCQRDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. rn�e•�yc=;: ,; y..M..N•!�:a.w^as,n.aluu.*s,•»s�ucev,�r.rrv�r.•,.r,.. .nnwe.rws:w.+wr•� `no'57 ZUT '`;�,-`.�H1S.yV,ARR•'►NTY: aJ1i�D•'•Made unde.�cecatedthe �8tit, day at.Jui�s''".A.•,l)._�19(ehlsy.'= ". _ 14*RT�1.+z- COVE,• INC: _ T a.eorpvr$tioo existing under: the laws of- The State oflncrida; ead�hsivin9 iti.prittieipal, p3acb;;of.bu'siness. $t.633,•.;9th Street Nor*.. Naples, flbridi► h6rei'rutrbr csllad liie.;::a:= 8 VERIOR �1�RDENB.'..INCOiiP01<iAT>�D.;:a:Florida Corparatiosi,':=;.:;^;-; ;�, �whascpcgtoffioe-k�ss.:is:_560 Moorii7g:.Lina_Dr}ve.=;=°Napl�s;_�F'1orida; ,hereina�ffsr addrt=. t�:;;t;alad tlid'grantee:" ; »� ;:-.(Wheraver'used'herein -the •terms "graator'!'and "grantor"iziclude `•' the psrUea'to-thir'instrument.aiidthe.heirs .legal representativq's, :'.:;==' and ase'gne:afiedividualA, attdthe successors and -ass! ns of-''-' ,'.: . • •. • � corporations. ): : r.:.�:;..'';k�r WITNESSET[I; Thtit,:tha ranter,. for, -and in coiistderatiort of 9 _ 10:00)..and othdk valuable eO"deraticids :'receipt w}icaeot.is towlodRad, by.'tliese-::praveuts ;dDell. `&rant, :bu`rgaiitt;'. stsll.:alien,fi r""emiec.';,are.lease; ; =.00itveY, and confirm. unto tlic`ralntoc,, all that:certaln:itattd rituals in• Collier,. o:`parrs} of land lying in, the Southwest q[tartCr SW 1-/'4)- df,Scctf' Tow fiship• 50�.South', . it3nge 26 East+ which tract or, pargel••is described s►d fo114s:''•: 5 J •feot'.p .(as measured bri aerpendicuiar_) of said: siiu :thwost.`. • ,: •'::> ::-. .:s. ..:qusiter (SW:1•/4); SUBJECT town•eaaement:for`the"exeavatiorr; coPatrnt<'•c;;'�"�•'!• ti.op;and':iriaintenance •af dridnage facilities'over aod. along the wcst.60-.fret tgdreot And o'vcr•.'and along the north 66 feet thereof; containing 92. ae'i;es:'.'' ::::;:• _' :exclusive of::sald drainage eaaen}ents; -TOGETHER with an:easement::(oY,:.- :• " roadway purposes extending frdm the.erist line of the herein,•desc'ribed ac;a to Maple Lane as shown on the plat of -Unit No. I. mykie t;gve Ac'ras; ',:r000rdcd in- Plat Book 3•ot•page.'36'of the public'raccrdu. of Colliar:.Criur}ty;',:;��. ' `' ``� `eaid'oascment being that part'of`.thu south half {S 1/•2) of Sec"ion'3t1 ani3 ;that. part of Lots.. l:artd 2 1n •Block E :of MyrLie Cove Acres, l.yigg wi#hin:;3Q:: ;feet eac} vide-c;f•0-to.following dosc.xibed Brae:. Frotq the. quarter -'section corner onflje• wart;line'of;e,sid `: :.� :`• .30-run-61..:87• lfi'PO" E. along the east arid, west quxjter section liue•of,said.sec,tian.'for 1:;•598:`95 fre£;'th'ent:e:run.S:. 002V41 P1.W. -. t- ,paralldl with th-e .west iine'of said: Section'3d,• .and 1,:597. 57'fe'et. (as meaeu�ed;on ar peipendict,lar) .eait of said wenc iinn, for b63..4�4?: :•;feevto the pent of beginning of. said cenjcr line.: From said point - . of bag,'inning:r�pn N-.•.87. 8'30" T:. for. 3; M.47 feet to'a J5161nl off•. east line'of, said'Section30. which point is 667.05 feet south. =' Mqh Said east ime from the `quarter section corner on acid .lineI� '.:': 'and:'whidh•pointis. point of eury lure; thence rite northe'.., rly alt�ng.theacgf;atirxve;:to.thin.leftof'raaici4.24:.]t3.lcet:fcir.l0b::87,..�:-:;- - !�" = Ic4Vto. a paint'of rep+arse.cu'rvaturc;aNencr:.ru,i.iiorthaast�rly +• ' southeasterty'along ;the.a rp.of tr curvo'to.the'tight cif radius 245. 1$ •; ",,� feat 'for:.l.l9.Z3 fort to a•_point on the ccnte.r. linu.cif •sditi Map! r:L:anc ___ ...:`:said poitiC.bciug.i3.04-foot.ivc9t uloitg.ss,aid•centcr-line from a - .- - 'prolohgation of tlic'line•dividYdg Lo(s41ind 3 df Block E of stud, ' ;= Unit xNo. 1,' Myrtle Gove Acres. - All Bearings herdinabova mentioned are cal' olatcd'fronl thusu ahow-.; said ' plat of, Unit No, 1; Myrtle Cove Acres. SUBjE:CT•ALS6 to taxes for-u.ie yeay.1961;•an oil lease to Humble Oil & ;ft[:Pining Company dated July 1; 195Z anti reggrdod August 6; .1952 in De-ed Book 2'9 at page 385', Public Records of Collier. County, Florida,,.as affegt4d- �,by 1n;'assigniiient �of'c:verridi:riq r;y'aIty dated �7uIy 1;' 1952 and;r'eco.rded .''August 20, 1953 in Deed Book 29 at page 341' of said Pantie itecbrds;.and' .:reservations and easerrients of. record.'' 87 eAa268 TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditamento and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining, :.-T0.HA-V-EL7.:AND TO HOLD,' the some in fcc simple forever. 7 AND th4'�gFdhtor 'hereby'covenaints'with said grantee that it is lawfully seized of said* - land-inefou simple; -that it has good 'right and lawful authority to -sell and v�.`conv.ysaid'ja:oid;* that it hereby fully warrants the title io'said land and will dofd3nd C.- same agadn'it,thc lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has caused those ',C4 rp6+ presents to be executodi in itsname. and its corporate ogal 007. to be hereunto afffskod, by its proper officers thureunto duly author4zud, Lhe day and year first above writtdn. /* MYRTLE COVE, INC. Ves.I:..Wa-ljkcr,- Secretary. Signed; 'sealed and delivered In the By: he- 7--1 isiance of:- Forrest Walker; President 16' �Y 'T ID U14 ER T.Y OF .'COLLIER CERTIFY that on this day, before me. an officer duly authorized. 76ounty aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared -:'-Forrest Wal kew and James L.':Walker -W,011'known-16"hi!q� to be the President and Secretary respqcY �tivel of the corporation named as granto r in the f6regoing deed, aidthat they severally ackn6wtedged execut- ihg the _sarneL ln.,the presence of two subscZlbing witnesses freely and voluntarily _..under author tj? �1uly vested in them by said corporation and that the seal affixed. corporate seal of said corporatidn. WITNESS':rriy hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this L :ZB'th:lr -day :of June A, D. lib 1. ram— tEC :.rn THIS INa:RiMUT PRBPAAED SY1 'P%M 110919 Ire gleams III Voc RI.Acmd LL, 11ALRSA, 1AscuL a EosaL 4225 trseidential court INp _ 5 �TA FWt eippers, Mild& 33111 iflrlblF MAO &1(e ta+em To Esc Nampa, Rd41 X"2 ROAD 1MINTANARgs A415MM"T or AGRZIMM m. made this -ALL day of �_, 19� i , by and watwoon the undersigned part as, here na er refarre"d�co as the ^Property Owners.° WHEREAS, t4+e Proper ners own and possess certain properties located in //ice County, Florida. which proper ti s Shutt a certain existing roadway known as , bhii is use by y t." Property Mins;s tor ingress and eyreae..to 0'I their properties, horeinafter referred to an the "Roadway°i and -'- WHEREAS, many Tortgage lenders and financial institution* v C-1 require an agreemaAL providing for the maintenance of such ,.e W en"AvAva. rhinh era ,.aithar awnM nor a lni.ainad by E.ha County. in order to mr"o mer"gage losns sncurel p_r the adjoining properties and the Property Owners des.re to enter this so mnintsnanre earpeement in nrAer to !reduce snc•h lendere t" make tho$e loanas and MHEREAB, the Property Ounere consider the continued preservation and maintenance of the roadway to be beneficial to the use and enjoyment of their property and desire to provide r that the mutual and reciprocal duties and obligations regarding .,r is the maintenance and upkeep of the roadway be shared by all the P.- 9 respective Property owners and their respective heirs, Lr) 4-) successors, assigns and successors in title to all or. part of the *•- t5 property having the use and enjoyment of the roodwayl J J HOW 'THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of TEN (01:.00) o DOLLARS, the Mutual promises contained Loarsin and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which is ++•?t'eby dackn4wlodgad, thn Parties agras as f.allowa: 1. $ubi or owner@$ The parties and respective properties thsn w ich ere subject to the terms and condition■ of thief agreement are set forth in s schedule attached hereto 69 ExhiLlit "A". 2, O on tion of Roadwsyt The roe waY hich is the subject of this agreement a commonly mown ae , an improved roadway which is r,eithet owr, For ma ni to ned by shy utate, county or other governmental agency, 3. eta ndsd of asintenancet The roadway shall be maintained in muri% a±nnA•f on an ko ha wwaai,le uv a 4LASW&I4' SL'tazobi2o without undue difficulty. Thi roadway shall be mainkained with the same typo and quality surface as that covering the roadway at the tiffs of this agreement and ill the event of destruction of the roadway by flood or other disaster, the roadway shall be replaced and restored to its otiginal condition, This agreement shall, how4vo r, in no way require the Property Owners to iaprove or up-- grado the oondition of the Roadway to a quality auperior to its r.enAirinn an the date of this Agreement. i Nan,r+nne 1s"RVA41e mmintaesnes, env and eii deeieione regarding a cord t on anon entent arcs` of the roadway shall be made by the majority of the Property owners attending such itastinge of the Property Owners as may be called from time to time. Property Csrnate' meetings may be called by any Property Vwud• VY Y�VViNauy rY each Property Owner. The notice shall include the tiaw, date, n1sna nr rho westinn Anti shall xt.ata the items to be discussed at -, =K CA TEL Nu . l 813 489 4605 Apr 13.86 8 *.28 P .03 w �.�.. �..... w..r.r �.,w wlor • Nrwr4 aathO�iaiaa • aaotAer progesty owner or a legal representative to -ttand ar*? •"ific meeting and to vote at such meotift on their bshalf� afsanes of a Prensrty owner at iparson auth2r `2a t seat a the Meokld4. &AY Broparty Chvntr ewy give a proxy authorising ena.td+ec 7raport7; owner or a iaaal representative to at_tsnd any specific meeting and to vote at auoti meeting on this` bsns3f• Absenoy of • property Owner or po_rlon authorised to ropres•mt a Property owner st a meeting shall oonstit t'n clotted L the Property Waez,z right t0 Vote at any grope.. a4• So 114trilffitiono , The contribution oY each Proper y naz a any s n ananae xor4 required on the roadway shall be oosputed on a pro -rat& basis net on thi front footage of the respective Property ownex's property adjoinirg the oa3,tay. 6. catian AL m►areeaehQi Thim agreesent shall be perpetual mwasMant and covenant running with the land and no pant of the Les of the property o>: any party nextco shall pass or be vested in any other party without suoh conveyance bein(i subject to .fie terms of this agrees®^e¢. In the avant, however, that the cesponsibility for the care and Vai iL thernce of the ,Political sub ivi ionis s this agreementby any ushallobsoaae null and void. 7 . ,lints+ b n tteWa. ro `$ The terms �esnd Cpr o the na Lao of maid m agrvertert tiatwAen tits parti�cs h9zatc relating to the dutlet cold 7� P412ya�.A c.uw aPwr,... 5....�... A _ agreement shall not be subject to change or modification unlese by a written instrument executed with too same .orm31ity as tt" agreement. ml. Partial lt!_ya}ldlty' In the event that. any provisions of this agresaent are hold contrary to or invalid under the laws of ny caontrv. state or other jurisdiction, such illegality or Invalidity shall not effect any other proviaioc+■ herein, all of which shall continue in full force and a€fect. 9. torne ' Peest In the event of any cntrovut Ofors , claim or die?ute between the parties hereto, arising o to ibis aireor+'s�t: or the hrwenh thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover froet the losing party reasonauie expenses, ettorney'd '.ecs and 10. sindia sffe ti This agreement shall bind and inure to tht bane t o t e respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties herstu+ Furthermore, this agreement shall be fully enforceable by any mortgage" and rely9 ng mortgage loan against property adjoining w Roadwayon this agreement in making suoh loAn. IN WITNESS NHRMF,the ipiretiabovehave hem dnnto set their hands and seals the day and year I'� i � •man ,i ._. .. �.. i LY DEVEL _ �El)SORATIO ✓ 2 eca eana Aar 13.98 8t29 P.04 WATN or COUMPr or V U' ruses 1 edumn or COLIter f 0l tapp __zsE' day of -UU 1/BB, before ue eoravaally appertr --- ' John J. Aaaa:li. Vice President. LILY DEVRLOTIODrr CDRtMTTOx to sa kne'"' who executed sad known to INto be the individual defarihW lR and the llgreas�aet ca ca as that they executed the eaeoutad the soma. and, Ehoy disc a4knaal a to � to ja e'ITUMS WHRAMOY, I have hereunto sat my hand, and !!loiA17% eaal at said County and Btate, CA on the day and y.-Ar abays.itgon. My Commission expireat 4 J J STATA lei �ncu®.ei 1 C01iNTY of 1�11/�4i/jst. 1 i On tt:ia ':7 Fear "/er/41r, cc to CD to ae known, AA4 u<r. co Ae to ben the individual described l;e xrd Who executed the foregoing Agreement and they did emknowlodgm to me that they aYecuted the sans. rN MlTpipp NNameop, I have hereunto set my hand and offivW'...,. sea] at Bald County and State, on the ay and year Above writC � � MY co i gttpiresr M PUBLIC 3 x ink eTATR orCOUWY Or On this poesonall.y appaara`Z day of , 1401, bafora tie tt► me known- sad known to me to be the Individual described in and who executed the foregoing Agreement and they did sOknowledge to ws that they executed the same. . IN NITHass MHuzor, I have hereunto set my hand and official feel At Said County and State, on the day and year above written. my *omission expiresi arr"M Or COUNTY or On this day of peufosally as,oearad BMW U9L C t- s q.r <x a 19aC • w.. who executed the t sgtQ as to be a eing h9ressant&Ad lth yu dldaacknowledg•Sto Y nd NO that they ex"ut(A the Assn. �` weal cNsaid CeSSa �n�dritI h4von thins iad ORY band and official " Y year above written. Mr oasaiaaton expirsaoFOUIC---�-y- , p:M_1 'aO rOIINry. ROaaM -A 3181695 OR: 3288 PG: 1753 RICORDID in OPPICIAL WORDS of COLLIIR COMM, It Ibis instrument was prepared 05/12/2003 at 09MAl1 DNIGIT 1. BROCK, CLIRI without opinion of title by RIC 111 37.50 and after Recording Return to: Itta: William J. Dempaey CHIPPI PAS3IDONO IT AL Chef y Passidomo Wilson & Johnson, LLP 821 STB AVI S #201 821 Fifth Avenue South KAPLIS PL 34102 Naples, Florida 34102 (239)261-9300 This Amended and Restated Road Maintenance Agreement ("Agreement") is made this -Z day of Am It—, 2003 (the "1✓ffectf a Date"), by and between Peter Iaconelli and Robin L. Iaconelli, husband and wife (the "Iaconellis'", and Ted Wusehke and Patricia Wuschke, husband and wife (the "Wuschkes") their respective successo d/Or assigns, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Owners," or individually as the "Owner," and by rely evclopment Corporation, a Texas corporation ("Lely"). WHEREAS, the laconellis own and pipssess certain real property located in Collier County, Florida, described in attached Exhibit "A," incorporated herein by reference (the "Iaconeili Property"), and the Wuschkes own and possess certain real propertycate&n Collier County, Florida, described in attached Exhibit "B," incorporated herein by reference (the ske Property"); and µ sh%;operty (collectively the "Properties") abut WHEREAS, the Iaconelli Property and the Wit a portion of that certain roadway known as Maple Lane iieally described and graphically depicted in attached Exhibit "C," incorporated herein by reference (th0�'Rtaadway"), which Roadway is used by the Owners for ingress and egress to the Properties; WHEREAS, Lely, together with Robert H. White and Charlotte C. White (the "Whites"), executed that certain Road Maintenance Agreement dated April 21, 1988, and recorded in Official Records Book 1345, Page 1917, of the Collier County Public Records (the "1988 "' ment") with respect to the 4 Roadway; and WHEREAS, Lely, the Wuschkes, as successors in interest to the des, and the Iaconellis, as 11 successors in interest to and assigns of Lely, wish to amend and restate the 1988 A " x' _ ent by substituting this Agreement therefor. NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt ofwhich is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, and further agree as follows: 1. Amendment and Restatement: The 1988 Agreement is hereby cancelled and rendered null and void, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement substituted for the terms thereof. 2. $elcm of L&ly Development C2= anon: Owners hereby agree and acknowledge that the Iaconellis have assumed all obligations of Lely under the 1988 Agreement and this Agreement, and that Page 1 of 4 OR: 3288 PG: 1754 Lely, its successors and/or assigns, are hereby fully released from the terms and obligations thereof. 3. Standard of Maintenance: The Roadway shall be maintained by the Owners with the same type and quality surface as that covering the Roadway on the Effective Date, and in the event of destruction of the Roadway by flood or other disaster, the Roadway shall be replaced and restored to its original condition. This Agreement shall, however, in no way require the Owners to improve or upgrade the condition of the Roadway to a quality superior to its condition on the Effective Date. 4. Decisions Regarding Maintenance: Any and all decisions regarding maintenance of the Roadway shall be -ache by written agreement signed by the Iaconellis and the Wuschkes. Either Owner may request that maintenance nae be performed on the Roadway by submitting the request in writing to the other Owner, together w#th a ,rttten description and estimate of the expense of such maintenance provided by a licensed contractQt uit,of any Owner to respond to a written request for maintenance within Ten (10) days shall be deemed anapoval of the requested maintenance. 5. Contributions Toward Maintenance: The Owners shall contribute to the costs of maintaining the Roadway in equal pfo-rats one-half (1 /2) shares. G. Duration of Agrgqmcilf This Agreement shall automatically terminate and become null and void upon the earlier to occur of the fafowing: 1) recordation in the Collier County Public Records of an affidavit sworn by an Owner attesting:that uch Owner no longer utilizes the Roadway for means of access to such Owner's portion of the Propeies;,,4;2) recordation in the Collier County Public Records of an affidavit sworn by an Owner attesting that thel responsibility for the care and maintenance of the Roadway has been assumed by any county,, nunnicipality or other political subdivision, or by any homeowner's association.` 7. Notice: All notices, consents, deman s�requ.,sts, approvals, waivers, payments, deliveries, and communications required hereunder shall be deemed Cove been duly given upon hand delivery to: If to Iaconellis: Peter and Robin laconet' 188 Price Street" Naples, Florida 34113 If to Wuschkes: Ted and Patricia Wuschke <' 5151 Maple Lane Naples, Florida 34113 or to such other address or addresses as may be designated by written notice toihe other party in conformity herewith. 8. Entire ement: This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto relating to the duties and obligations herein assumed. The terms and provisions of this agreement shall not be subject to change or modification unless by a written instrument executed with the same formality as this agreement. 9. partial Invalidity: In the event that any provisions of this agreement are held contrary to or invalid under the laws of any country, state or other jurisdiction, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provisions herein, all of which shall continue in full force and effect. 10. Attorneys Fee: In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties Page 2 of 4 OR: 3288 PG: 1755 hereto arising out of or relating to this agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, attorneys fees and costs. 11. Binding Effect: This agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit ofthe respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. WITNESSES- e it Witness # 2 Witn s # 1 W(16e;s # 2 Wi 1 Witness # 2 STATE OF FL - A COUNTY OF CC LU (;A — T Y: Development Corporation, a Texas as President I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly4"UWh6riz""W in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared peter taconelll an& obin Iaconelli, husband and wife who are personally known to me or who have produced as identification. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the Coup and State last aforesaid this Z day ofAs 11 _ 2003. --� (SEAL) wum,MpcoEu, :. MY COAIMI6SION ! ee olew fa, ZU Public Signature Printed Name My Commission expires: Page 3 of 4 OR: 3288 PG: 1756 STATE OF FLO ll�� COUNTY OF J�,('�' I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, ersonally appeared Ted Wuschke and Patricia Wuschke, husband And wife, who ersonally known o me or who have produced as identification. n ITNESS atid.ar �-} (SEAL) I�r Ca�rMtM official seal in the 30.E STATE OF FLORIDA ' COUNTY OF A01-4. t I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this c County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, Development Corporation, a Texas corpora to me. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the �1( , 2003. NAMA:cons aMwg � 14 TWA troor� (SEAL) WW No*g1r oo �w �a"w F.\wpd=XRmULYDHVN.efy 4ka\Rcd MriMmna Aveme Q wPd Printed Name — My Commission expires: this d y of _ 3uAe- 30, QOO6 me, an officer duly authorized in the State and appeared Luke de Lange, as President of Lely talfofthe corporation, who is personally known aforesaid thisday of Nota blic Stgnatu Printed Name e / j My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 File No.: 202070017 OR; 3288 PG; 1757 EXHIBIT "A" TRACT NO. 10, UNRECORDED ADDITION TO MYRTLE COVE ACRES IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/z OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, , E� 26 EAST, RUN NORTH 87016720" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF skIv'� CTION OF A SECTION FOR 4,505.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINMN ' qr ..THE LANDS HEREBY CONVEYED; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING COtmou NORTH 87016720" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 357.93 FE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION `' 0; WHICH CORNER IS ALSO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF UNIT NO. 1, MYRTLE COVE ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOT f3, PAGE 38, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE -RUN SOUTH 2045'40" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH '/z SECTION 30 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID U,l NO. 1, MYRTLE COVE 5`11FOR 677.05 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87028'30" WEST FOR 329.47 FEETMORE OR LESS TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE THROUGH THE POINT QF�BEGINNING PARALLEL WTTH SAID WEST LINE OF THE SOUTH '/: OF SECTI 3 THENCE RUN NORTH 0°21'40" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 673. , , FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SUB CT TO AN EASEMENT FOR DRM A0E PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE NOR 50 FEET AND THE EAST - " THEREOF; SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR -ROD AY PURPOSES 60 FEET WIDE OVER AND ALONG THAT CERTAIN ROADWEASEMENT AS DESCRIBED AND CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED IN OR BOOK'7, PAGES 267 AND 268, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, f Llb OR: 3288 PG: 1758 Exhibit "B" Tract No. 9 of Unrecorded Addition to Myrtle Cove Acres, in the South '/2 of Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as: From aner .e monument marking the Northwest corner of the South ''/Z of Section 30, Townp,outh, Range 26 East, run North 87 degrees 16' 20" East along the North line 66aWfraction of a section for 4182.93 feet to the Point of Beginning of the lands here' escr bed. From said Point of Beginning continue North 87 degrees 16' 20" East along said North line for 323.06,fe�t; -ihence run South 0 degrees 21' 40" West, parallel with the West line of said fractioi of a section for 673.75 feet; thence run South 87 degrees 28' 30" West for 323 feet; th cerun North 0 degrees 21' 40" East parallel with said West line for 672.61 feet topeloipt of Beginning. FAwpdocs\KE\LELYDEVgxty Lakes\Wuschke.iegaI.descr.wpd 6 wilsonmillee New Directions In Planning. Deign 3 Engineenng OR: 3288 PG: 1759 Legal Description All that part of Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East and part of Lot 1, Block "E", Myrtle Cove Acres, Unit No. 1, Plat Book 3, Page 38, Collier County, Florida Lely Lakes easement for Amended Road Maintenance Agreement All that part of eetion 0, Township 50 South, Range 26 East and part of Lot 1, Block "Ell, Myrtle Cone Acres, t No. 1, Plat Book 3, page 38, Collier County, Florida and being more particularly described as _follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of said Section 30; Thence along the east line of sal Section 30, North 02°45'35" East 1899.90 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence leaving said line Sduth 87°26'4I" West 500.00 feet; thence North 02°45'35" East 01,feet to a point on the south line of that land described in Official Records Book 105, paZ !9 594; thence North 02°45'35" East I thence North 87°26'41" East 500:0mfeet to a point on the east line of said Section 30 and the west line of said Lot 1, Block "E"; ' thence North 81027' 11" East 78.39 fee thence North 42°44'47" East 39.73 feect ti a ba "E" and Lot 25, Block "F', Myrtle Cove A thence along the easterly line of said Lot 1 alb t Lane southeasterly 68.47 feet along the arc of a northeast having a radius of 60.00 feet through a subtended by a chord which bears South 32° 19" comer of said Lots 1 and 2, Block "E' ; thence leaving said line South 81 *27' 11" West 1 Certificate of authorization #LB-43. Subject to easements and restrictions of record; WR SON MILLER, INC. Itgostered Engineers and Land Surveyors y common comer of said Lot 1, Block No. 1; the westerly right-of-way of Maple angential circular curve concave to the %l angle of 65°23' 17" and being ;agt 64.82 feet to the northerly common the Point of Beginning. D3 24 F. Date nIl r. mmuncy, rr.71ri w 2D-77 --"Not valid unless embossed with the Professional's seal. : N9599-002-X02 GCS00 asw�w,n�o, rr. as rew "" map/as fort Myers Sarasota ramps Tallahassee Panama City #sack 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 A(Wk s, Fkrda 34105 941-6494W W 941-643-5716 www:wlAr onftlermn WifsonMWeOnc. — Fl LIC.I [C-0000170 in OR: 3288 PG: 1760� y W N 0 a d = A 040 < N cry O< od 1_ A t=y m L Y (WA O <m W o� too 01 N < • N N W < S Z < i-' ""' CL Cuj m O � m <WCD � C m 0) N N C 01 < � N O 0 <Z< x •- a. •WN mma le < N O �UJ C m - N h -1i - - - - - - -- j - 1 r a•Ts'1 'E soo-0� 1f1i== 0I1"A11DE A N S' $ 'E i, 'a2C.00 t M,`31• IIf 79.39 39.73 o I I I W< .BL�CK -F-I I W' �< 241 r I A OF PROPOSED R P INT\O,F BEGINNING 1 BROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEiENT. f� _ 1 `�` L•u.0 � I I i i•Tp.sl - - - - - WWII" U-82 MAPLE LANE A,�, ©2I f f1•ii' » w 1 f 1 BLOCK -E'1 I 1 1 1 1 2 I I I I 1 t 1 I ---------------' 31 f I I 30 I5• D.E. O.R. BOOK 1154. PAGE 1797. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ' SE C.QRNEUTT- CHON30. 1 COLII FL9B19/►., ACTiVITr INITIALWO2 Ap�M• 'gypRESEARCH �3 • -. .7 0, • DO,F1ELD YDIIK/GREY CII9EF Wes •'aRrEi0R5 •PLANTERS • ENflIROwETAt CONWLTANTS C'� r-! 1 `-'GLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • TRANSMIATION �TANIS AFT D LTM I `'- YyiL>i0N�110FESCHECKED Br. .JPM , F,�00 O/IiLtT kWE AT AINPORT ROAD. UnIE 200 4 FIELD GOOK/PACE /.. ��*;_ RAftU. "IDA 3A10S CMI N9-OM FAK C2361 f13-S71p CP3 IN1MM ROAD MAIN ACIIEEM' 00/03 eat• I'll -for GENERAL NOTEST II p/oKwM9 A1[ 10 /!IT IM 9R1NIL9 ilk. tlNd0 = E 010iR0 1! r = 't' 0 6. 1ME. L•109 LSIMIL T• i10p)!T MfTANOI r M. o ►.as. N01 "M wwr OF 0E mus. 31 &-" irRwm NSW-W-IIIP. O E/0I1109 An 0/9S 00 TW NEOT LIE IF 9[fi I" n Em IIppIN 011•arar am. 01 3a ATTSOMPOW0 ME LW& E21wrIIw. i W NY i!V 1 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET ,s•• MOT A StOWET 000 f M i �OY� m I OWN& 1� UNIT ss e-m I w 1 2D-" • 27TOO 1021 24-14t-03 10607 AIM / 27709-27 % �; 9 COLLIER COUNTY i!0 I G�68 �1001 15 I989 sEP -7 PM3: I OR BOOK PAGE RECORDED UTILITY EASEM= East Naples Sewer Project Page/Line - 11/16 & 17 (Comiercial Properties) INT THIS EASEMENT, granted this _(� day of % 1989, by IND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES SOUTHWEST, INC., a Florida corporation, as GRANTOR, to the COLLIER C=M WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic with the by-l!o BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLoRIDA, as the Ex-Officio 310U Governing Board, its successors and assigns, as GRANTEE. WITNESSE�'I-I: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations paid by the GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRAND E, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, nonexclusive easement, 1;i5 s�� and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain utility facil, including but not limited to water, sewer, and power lines on the "fb11i ing described lands being located in Collier County, Florida, to wit.,,` See attached Exhibit "A" which is inrorated herein by reference. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the'tRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above writ��, f WITNESSES: COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES SOUTHWEST, INC., a Florida co ration10.0 arm° x e� BY: 1 .wee/President G (CORPORATE SEAL) .� STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowldged ,Y before me by David Green President i of COMMERCE PROPERTIES SOUTHWEST, INC., a Florida corporati:gh1- , /' n , behalf of the corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal this llth day of z-,-A`r ust 1989. (NC7TARIAL SFAQ .r { Prepared by: (Or11131h �• Cuyler, Esquit� offin Of the f ;Ur1 1't"`:' ^iiiftirilE;Y ( _ m N Public my Co ,;arySPubl, Na orfsfcri 7 29 91 My CeaimWion Crpires July 29, 1991 6Ond4d Thru Twy Fain • Imurance Inc. Received $ a o7 d documentary Stamp Tax Received $ -I/� Class "C" Int&n(7,ihla 1-Personal Property Tax COLLI�QNTYRK URTS BY O.0 r6 8 10 1 1 6 Ld O LL'7 O � N O N 10' DRAINAGE z EASEMENT 3tZ' a' s e-Y-25-30 w W CORNER OF MYRTLE7MVE ACRES UNIT 1 WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SEC. 29 T-50—S. R-26—E 11 N 890 38'-10' W 128.04 100.' 100.' 100.' 25 024 23 In*22 21 BLOCK "F" 100.' 100.' 1i. u : ea4e R 60.00' 102.49' ' CD- 84.31' CB- N ,N': cc PIPELINE old.. 30' so' ROAD cc EASEMENT O In EASEMENT L() 2 I O.R. 87 r- PG.267-268 146.08 1:' 60' R/W MAP N 89 -3 µ MYRT .m.OVE UNIT NC.,.IJ Pa. BLOCK. ,,E" `j:3 'in4 ;l 00.100.'- 890 -38' 10" W :RES PG. 38 ,5 100.' N I 0 25 50 100 SCAT£ N FEET WEST LINE OF MYRTLEICOVE ACRES UMT V01 I I REVISION DATE FILE NO. ENSS 339 WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. DFW3N BY DATE SMB 11-19-88 ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & LAND SURVEYORS 1383 AIRPORT ROAD • 5576.2 NAPLES, FLORIDA 33942 F :. PROPOSED PIPELINE EASEMENT Legal Description All that part of a road easement as described In O.R. 87 pages 267-268 as recorded in Collier County Public Records. Colllef County. Florida, lying Northerly of the described centerilne of said easement, and lying in Lot 1. Block E. Myrtle Cove Aces Unit No. 1, P.B. 3 Pg. 38. Collier County Public Records. Collier County. Florida. Containing 0.075 acres more or less. Bearings shown hereon refer to the Plat of Myrtle Cove Aces Unit No. 1. Plat Book 3 at page 38. Collier County Public Records. Collier County. Florida. Subject to easements. reservations and restrictions of record. WILSON. MILLER, BARTON. SOLL & PEEK. INC. Reg. E gI and L d Surveyors BY 1 h, ' Wilbur M. Christiansen, Jr.. P.L.S. State of Fla. 12765 ' * NOT A SURVEY * SKETCH OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PIPELINE EASEMENT PART OF LOT 1 81.00X E MTLE COVE ACRES UNIT NO 1 P8 3 PC 3a PART OF SECTION 29 T-W-S R- 28-E COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA PLATE NO. 10 PAGEAJNE 11/16 (County N ti k 5'KI5util.EoSeme"-% �i�u LTA -B, 23.a41 �o'.r� 5-1 �o INSERT STANDARD 5TREET END Scale: V'= 50' NOTE, P.R.M.'s are 4'K4"924'Concrete Monuments,or45c4'K66'Concrete Poets. both chord and arc distances are shown an curved lines with bearings tti chords. bearings are calculated -From an assumed bearing o+ N 39'04'L1/on 1- of poving of Tarn;ami Trail. All lot lines marked with Steel pins unless monuments indidoted. I hereby Certify that this plat of MYRTLE COVE ACRES, UNIT No.l is a true ond correct representation of a recent survey made and platted under my direction and that permanent reference monurnen--s (P.R.M.'s) have been set'm accordance with the. provisions o� Section 7, Chapter 10275 Laws of Florida,Acts of 1925. Reg. Land Sur yor Fl a. Certif i c ate No.35t 1.4` UNIT No MYRTL COVE ACT�,�S A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF S# OF SECTION 29, T.50S.9 R.26E. WEST OF TAMIAMI TRAIL COLLIER COUNTY,,FLORIDA Scale e I "= 200' DE SCRI PTION All that Part of the south {'half(51) of Sec+ion 29,T.505.,R26E. lying south -:nd wes+4 the Tamiornl Troi1(5tateRoad No.90) except t}gat Parcel marked "Not Included in this Plat"pre— viousl g conveyed to Griffin bu deed recorded in peed Book 4 a+ Page 158 of the public records oar Coilier County, July, 1955 DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS 4ha-t Myrtle Cove, Inc. a corporotion under the rows of Florida, the owner ofthe here- on described lands hascausedthisplatofLINITNo.IMYRTLECOVE ACRES to be made and does hereby dedicateto the perpetual use of+he public all stree-hs,roods, Jones and/or courtsshown hereon. IN WITNE55 WHEREOF Myrtle Cove,lnc . has causedthis dedica- ti on to be signed in its name by ifs vice-presidentand its corporate 5eol to be af-Fixed,attes+ed by)ts secretarythiS---�-thdayofJuly, A. D. 1955• MYRTLE COVE,INC. i (r, ViCe-Ptesider,# 1 Attest . Secretary ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFCOLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFYtha+ onthis day, before me personally appeared RobertL.Wa)ker-and Jame.sL,.Wciker,respectively VicepresieJentand 5ecretaryof'MyrtreCove,Inc. ,a Corporation underthelaws JFlorlda, to me known fo bethe persons described in and who executed+hefare- goin9 dedicotionandthey ocknowledgedtheexecuti,onthereofto be their free act and deed as such officers,fortheuses and purposes therein mentioned) and tha+they affixed thereto the official seal ofsaid Corporation andthatsaid dedication isthegctarid deedof said corporation. WITNE55 my hand and official seal at Naples, said Countyond State,this 5 'day o-FJu1y,A.D-I955. Notary Public,,Sfa eoF Florida at large My Commi ssion exp1re5 ma-Y It 19-69 PLAT BOOK 3, IAAChiE APPROVALS This Flat approved }his 5tb clay of d u, A.D. 1955 in open rnect- in9 of the board of County Commissioners of er Cbunty orida. Approved: r Chairman - ) HEREBYCERT'IFYthatthis plotof UNITNo.I,MYRTLE COVE ACRES has been examined by meand from my examination 1 fi nd that sai d platcomplies in form withthe requirementsof Chapter 10275,Lows ofFIorida,Acts of 1925. ✓4z,4Q I FURTHER CERTIFYthot said plat was fiiedinr recora! at_-rt. -this day o{JuIQ JulA. 0. 1955 and duly recpr;d.ed in Plat SooK , on Page o{ the pu blicrecords o{`CoI ierCoun- ty, Florida. , CIerkof Cr�I'ItCourt,�pand foF Collier Couniy,r1a. 5175 Maple Lane Location Map N W S 0 GradyMinor 410 205 0 410 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petition PL20210002449 — 5175 Maple Lane Rezone I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy --of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. Sharon Umpeiihour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this February 4, 2022 by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician, who is personally known to me. L2 - (Signature of Notary ublic) '"Y"" CARINJ.DWYER AA MY COMMISSION # GG 982367 �/'TK I AJ � I Jr AJ N ' + .o�A`•` EXPIRES: May 14, 2U24 l ,nF Py,.••• Rnevlwi Thni lJMsn, C,,ldiw ix..e.......u_._ Printed Name of Notary GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITION: PL20210002449 — 5175 Maple Lane Rezone In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a neighborhood meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Wolfgang Gilles (Applicant) will be held February 23, 2022, 5:30 pm at South Regional Library, Meeting Room A, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113. Wolfgang Gilles has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a rezone from the Agricultural Zoning District to the RSF-4 Zoning District to allow a maximum of 16 single family residential dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of 5.3± acres and is located at 5175 Maple Lane in Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. SCAN g X4 ME r Raintree LN'�` Maple LN rpress LN SUBJECT s PROPERTY s Project Location Map If you have questions or comments, contact Sharon Umpenhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or phone: 239-947-1144. For project information or to register to participate remotely* go to, gradyminor.com/Planning. Any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The applicant and GradyMinor are not responsible for technical issues. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 • Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 • LB 0005151 • LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA(. Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20210002449 I Buffer: 500' 1 Date: 6/6/2022 1 Site Location: 00439520009 NAME? NAME2 NAMES NAME4 NAMES NAME FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE 11140 TAMIAMI LLC 4980 TAMIAMI TRAIL N # 201 NAPLES, FL 34103--0 29 5026 COMM NELY CNR BLK D UNIT 1 MYRTLE COVE ACRES, N 39 DEG W 247.15FT ALG A LI 150FT MEAS ON A PERP FROM & PARA TO 00439360308 U 9364 VERCELLI CT LAND TRUST 2670 AIRPORT RD S NAPLES, FL 34112--0 VERCELLI LOT 30 79904071344 U 9372 VERCELLI COURT LAND TRUST 2670 AIRPORT ROAD S NAPLES, FL 34112--0 VERCELLI LOT 32 79904071386 U 9487 NAPOLI LANE LAND TRUST 52 LAWRENCE DRIVE #M601 LOWELL, MA 01854-- 0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 18-101 26149201142 U AHASIC, GARY JUDY AHASIC 9472 NAPOLI LN NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 13 79904071001 U ALAMPI FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP 8200 SARATOGA DR APT 403 NAPLES, FL 34113--3039 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 6-202 26149200240 U ARMSTRONG, PHILIP B & DIANA R 46 BALMORAL DR PITTSTOWN, NJ 08867--5181 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 16-101 26149200981 U ARTHUR, ALLEN M TIARRA ARTHUR 5203 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8549 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 25 & BLK F LOT 1 , LESS N 30FT OF W 95 60785600008 U AUGUSTINO A INGOGLIA REV TRUST 9116 NAPOLI CT APT 102 NAPLES, FL 34113--7797 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 13-102 26149200761 U AYALA, EDUARDO MACARIO AYALA 5217 TRAMMEL ST NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 1 60783320005 U BARGER, STEPHEN M & KATHLEEN L 9464 NAPOLI LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 15 79904071043 U BARTLETT FAMILY LIV TRUST 9122 NAPOLI CT#201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 12-201 26149200703 U BENNETT JR, WM M & ANGELA N 5224 RAINTREE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8521 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 4 60784720002 U BISHOP, DAVID R & LAURA H 220 BRECKENRIDGE DR AURORA, IL 60504--5255 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 13-201 26149200787 U BRUEN, JOYCE A & EDWARD E 180 W OLIVE ST ELMHURST, IL 60126 --3909 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 6-102 26149200208 U BUNEGAR, JAMES G VICKI R CARNEY 9368 VERCELLI CT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 31 79904071360 U CANNON, SYLVIA M 5210 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113--7710 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK C LOT 2 60782360008 U CAROL K TOBIN DEC OF REV TRUST 9495 NAPOLI LANE #201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 20-201 26149201346 U CARRIE RUDMAN DEC OF TRUST 243 W FREMONT AVE ELMHURST, IL 60126 --0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 32-102 26149202280 U CIABURRO, ANTHONY & SANDRA L 9487 NAPOLI LN #102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 18-102 26149201168 U CI RILLO, PETER R EVELYN L LEBA 9476 NAPOLI LN #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 32-202 26149202329 U CLIFFORD L HIGGS REV TRUST EUGENE N HIGGS MARK ECK 441 COX SAWMILL RD HENDERSON, MD 21640-1218 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 2 60784640001 U COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E W 30FT OF LOT 31 PER ORDER OF TAKING DESC IN OR 4349 PG 2820, AND W 3OFT LOT 1 BLK A, AND W 30FT 60784520105 U CORRADO, PRECIOUS J & NATHAN 5224 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8522 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 4 60783440008 U COSTANZO, GARY P & LEAH B 3186 OLD MILL DR CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44223-- 0 VERCELLI REPLAT LOT 35 79904072343 U CUNNINGHAM, DANIEL & CHARLOTTE 31 79TH ST BROOKLYN, NY 11209-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 12-101 26149200664 U CYPRESS -ENCLAVE LLC 568 9TH ST S STE 258 NAPLES, FL 34102--6620 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK C LOT 1 OR 1500 PG 952 60782320006 U DADIAN, PAUL & SHERI 6 N 265 JAMES CT MEDINAH, IL 60157--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 15-101 26149200907 U DARREL TANTONELLI REV TRUST JANET M ANTONELLI REV TRUST 424 SHADOW CREEK DR PALOS HEIGHTS, IL 60463-0 VERCELLI LOT 27 79904071289 U DCDH REALTY TRUST 18 BEAVER DAM RD N EASTON, MA 02356--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 29-201 26149202060 U DEGASPERIS, RONALD & ROSE 9484 NAPOLI LN #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 30-202 26149202167 U DEPEPPE, BARRY & LISA 2061 STAVE BELMAR, NJ 07719--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 12-202 26149200729 U DESTEFANO, EUGENE & DOROTHY 283 HURLEY AVENUE -- KINGSTON, NY 124010 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 30-101 26149202109 U DINIZO, RALPH LINDA DINIZO 227 JEFFERSON AVE WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 6-201 26149200224 U DONALD W ORT TRUST 6559 OLD SINGAPORE TRL SAUGATUCK, MI 49453--8410 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 18-201 26149201194 U EDWARDS JR, ESTHEL B MARY T EDWARDS 5205 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113--7709 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 30 OR 1277 PG 2352 60784480009 U EMERSON JR, RICHARD & RHONDA 93 RIDGE RD PORTLAND, ME 04103-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 10-201 26149200541 U ERDMAN, MICHAEL F & MICHELLE W 9484 NAPOLI LANE #102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 30-102 26149202125 U FAILLA, CHARLENE & VINCENT 14 LINDA CT MONTVILLE, NJ 07045-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 27-102 26149201883 U FEDERICI, JOSEPH R & ALICE 3416 SANDY PLACE TOMS RIVER, NJ 08753--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 27-201 26149201906 U FIORANI, GERALD & VICTORIA 7100 RED FOX RUN WASHINGTON, MI 48094-0 VERCELLI LOT 29 79904071328 U FRIEDMAN, NANCY C 9483 NAPOLI LN #102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 17-102 26149201087 U FRUITERMAN, MARK L & STAGY H 723 WALDENS POND RD ALBANY, NY 12203--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 10-101 26149200509 U GALLANT REVOCABLE TRUST 9491 NAPOLI LANE #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 19-202 26149201281 U GARCIA JR, RAFAEL 5201 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113--7709 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 31 OR 712 PG 628, LESS W 30FT PER ORDER OF TAKING DESC IN OR 4349 PG 2820 60784520008 U GARCIA, ANTONIO EVA SANTOYO GARCIA 5235 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8549 MYRTLE COVE ACRES, UNIT 1, W1Y2 OF LOT 21 60785440103 U GILLES, WOLFGANG % GERMAN SERVICES 3960 RADIO ROAD UNIT 208 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 30 5026 FROM NW CDR OF S1/2 SEC RUN E ALG N U OF S1/2 4505.99FT TO POB, CONT E 357.93FT TO HE CDR OF Si/2 OF 00439520009 U GOMEZ, DIEGO NAZARIO GOMEZ 5217 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 28 + W 33FT LOT 27 60784400005 U GOMEZ, NAZARIO 5229 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 27, LESS W 33FT OR 1124 PG 1539 60784360006 U GRACHUS, GLENN M CASSIDY C WEBER 5211 MAPLE LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 24 60785560009 U GRAFFEO, VICTORIA A 9130 NAPOLI CT#102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 10-102 26149200525 U GREGG N BEDELL REV TRUST 9332 VERCELLI COURT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 22 79904071182 U GREGORY WILLIAM MARRA TRUST DIANE JOAN GILBERT TRUST 9114 PRIMA WAY #201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 15-201 26149200949 U GULISH, MICHAEL J & JUDITH S 7 AJELIOS FARM ROAD SEYMOUR, CT 06483-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 8-201 26149200389 U HALEY, BARRY MAUREEN SULLIVAN 9476 NAPOLI LN #201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 32-201 26149202303 U HANEIN CHAGOURY & FULLER FAM REVOCABLE TRUST 1051NTERPROMONTRY RD GREAT FALLS, VA 22066--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 14-201 26149200868 U HEISE, ARTHUR G & ANNEMARIE 9380 VERCELLI CT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI REPLAT LOT 34 79904072327 U HENDRICKSON, JONATHAN KRISTIN HENDRICKSON 5232 MAPLE LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 5 OR 776 PG 407 60783480000 U HOSPOD, THOMAS F LESLIE CARTWRIGHT 6 MEAGANS WAY HAVERHILL, MA 01832-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 8-102 26149200363 U HUDELL, JOHN G 5211 RAINTREE LN NAPLES, FL 34113-4628 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK G LOT 2 60785700005 U ISON, DAVID C 5227 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 22 60785480008 U JAMES & DIANE MACIOCE LV TRUST 19224 SHERWOOD GREEN WAY GAITHERSBURG, MD 20879- 0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 24-102 26149201647 U JAMES E R/L TRUST TERRI L RUSSELL R/L TRUST 3205 DUNE LN STEVENSVILLE, MI 49127--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 29-101 26149202028 U JAMES T KENYON REV TRUST 9480 NAPOLI LN #102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 31-102 26149202206 U JAY, MICHELLE S FRANCISCO PEREZ VILLAFANA 5216 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8522 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 3 60783400006 U JENKINS, STEVEN PANAGIOTA PAPPAS JENKINS 9490 NAPOLI LN #102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 29-102 26149202044 U JODY LOU WIETHOFF R/L TRUST 9483 NAPOLI LN #201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 17-201 26149201100 U JOSEPH J RACZ FAM REV TRUST 9487 NAPOLI LANE #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 18-202 26149201207 U JUDY W COOLBAUGH REV TRUST 9126 NAPOLI CT#201 NAPLES, FL 34113--8050 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 11-201 26149200622 U KAM INSKI, EUGENE EILEEN DUFF 9498 NAPOLI LANE #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 27-202 26149201922 U KENNETH D HINTLIAN TRUST 78 WAINWRIGHT RD #95 WINCHESTER, MA 01890--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 23-101 26149201540 U KIRK, ALEX ELIZABETH KNIGHTS 9112 NAPOLI CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 14-202 26149200884 U KLEGI N, MICHELE & TIMOTHY 9491 NAPOLI LN #101 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 19-101 26149201223 U KNICKLE, H NORMAN MARY SOTTELLA KNICKLE 6101 WESTERN AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20015--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 6-101 26149200185 U LACROIX, ROBERT L LARAINE BERGMANN 9116 NAPOLI CT#202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 13-202 26149200800 U LEE R SARDELLA REV TRUST MARY JO SARDELLA REV TRUST 75 STEEPLEVIEW DRIVE HAMPDEN, MA 01036-- 0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 25-102 26149201728 U LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT 6 MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966--0 VERCELLI TRACT FD-1 LESS THAT .44AC PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4232 PG 2706, LESS THOSE PORT .86AC & .91AC AS DESC IN OR 79904070109 U LENTINE, STEPHEN M & JOSEPHINE 9 WINDSONG LN WINCHESTER, MA 01890--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 16-202 26149201045 U LINDA D BERTANI REV TRUST JOHN A BERTANI REV TRUST 300 HARPER RD W SOUTHOLD, NY 11971-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 17-101 26149201061 U LIPAROTO, LEONARDO J & JULIE 43048 E HURON RIVER DRIVE BELLEVILLE, MI 48111-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 21-101 26149201388 U LOERA, ARTURO & BRENDA B 7910 BROOKSIDE GLEN DRIVE TINLEY PARK, IL 60487--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 24-201 26149201663 U LORA, CARLOS 5208 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8522 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 2 60783360007 U LUEDTKE, BRENDA C 5227 RAINTREE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8547 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK G LOT 4 60785760003 U MADSEN JR, THOMAS J 4 LAUREL LANE CHESTER, NJ 07930-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 11-102 26149200606 U MAROTTA, ANTHONY J & LINDAA 3 WRENFIELD DR SEWELL, NJ 08080--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 22-201 26149201508 U MARTIN JR, ROBERT JOHN JODI LEA MARTIN 9119 NAPOLI CT#102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 7-102 26149200282 U MARTIN, JEFFREV 5055 EXECUTIVE PARK DR ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 14-101 26149200826 U MARY MYLES TRUST 9122 NAPOLI COURT#102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 12-102 26149200680 U MCQUADE, MICHAEL F BERNADETTE MCQUADE 9511 NAPOLI LANE #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 24-202 26149201689 U MELANOPHY, MICHAEL J & KELLY 34 DRIFTWAY RD DANBURY, CT 06811--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 4-201 26149200062 U MELLO, GLENN G & MARGUERITE M 76 PEMBROKE ST SEABROOK, NH 03874-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 22-202 26149201524 U MEURER, PETER LENORE MEURER 9499 NAPOLI LN #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 21-202 26149201443 U MICHAEL C MAHONEY TRUST 9116 NAPOLI CT#101 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 13-101 26149200745 U MICHAEL P SPYRIDAKIS REV TRUST LEE K SPYRIDAKIS REV TRUST 9127 NAPOLI CT#201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 9-201 26149200460 U MILLER, STEVEN E & ANNE F 13 ATWELL RIDGE CAZENOVIA, NY 13035--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 24-101 26149201621 U MILLER, WILLIAM T LORNA J SAGNESS 9465 FOX CREEK LN MASON, OH 45040--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 19-102 26149201249 U MIRANDA, MARIA J 5239 MAPLE LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F PORT LOT 21 DESC: COMM SW CNR LOT 21, E50FT TO POB: CONT ESOFT, N75FT, W50FT, S75FT TO POB 60785400004 U MIRANDA, MARIA J 5239 MAPLE LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 21 LESS PARCEL DESC IN OR 1943 PG 1778, LESS WI/2 OF LOT 21 60785440006 U MYRTLE COVE INC PO BOX 517 --0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F UNIT 1 N 30FT OF W 95FT LOT 1 60784600009 U NAPOLI 2822 LLC 9731 ACQUA COURT#533 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 28-202 26149202002 U NARKE, JOHN J & MARGARET A 213 PINNACLE PEAK LANE WEATHERFORD, TX 76087--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 9-202 26149200486 U NEFF JR, HOWARD V JOAN E SEMENSI 9336 VERCELLI COURT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 23 79904071205 U POUst_500.x1s NEUKUM, JOSEPH JAMES BARBARA FINE NEUKUM 9107 NAPOLI CT#202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 4-202 26149200088 U NOBIL, STEVEN M & LAURAA 200 CHISHOLM COURT AURORA, OH 44202--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 32-101 26149202264 U PACITTI, JAMES A & DOROTHYA 5116 EAGLE TRACE TRAIL AUSTIN, TX 78730-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 20-102 26149201320 U PALAZZOLO, ANTONIO 329 CLUBHOUSE DR BLOOMINGDALE, IL 60108--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 7-101 26149200266 U PASS TR, PAMELA TRUST NUMBER 10 EST 9517 GULF SHORE DR APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34108--2037 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK G W + S 30FT OF W 85.38FT 60785680002 U PERRIN, THOMAS R & CAROLE S 9507 NAPOLI LANE #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--7792 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 23-202 26149201605 U PETRONE, ANTHONY & ANNETTE 9340 VERCELLI CT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 24 79904071221 U PETRY, JOSEPH W & LYNN P 13541 OSPREY POINT DRIVE JACKSONVILLE, FL 34224- 0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 16-102 26149201003 U PICCIONE, MARIO & FRANCA LIDIA 6530 ROMA TERRACE DRIVE HE ADA, MI 49301--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 5-102 26149200127 U PIVOVAR, NICOLINA 9499 NAPOLI LANE #102 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 21-102 26149201401 U POTEET, DANE A & PATRICIA N 10989 WINDJAMMER CT INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 28-102 26149201964 U PRINCIPE JR, VINCENT P 5218 CYPRESS LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK C LOT 3 60782370001 U PUSATERI, JOHN M & DEBOAA 52 LONG SANDS RD CTR OSSIPEE, NH 03814--0 VERCELLI LOT 26 79904071263 U QUIGG, JOHN & ROSEMARIE 6 HEWLETT DRIVE EAST WILLISTON, NY 11596--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 23-102 26149201566 U RAVEN SECURITIES INC PO BOX 23259 BELLEVILLE, IL 62223--0 29 5026 ALL THAT PART SEC 29 DESC AS FOLL: COMM AT NE'LY MOST CNR BLK D MYRTLE COVE ACRES UNIT 1, ALG SWLY 00439080002 U REGAS , LAWRENCE A & KRISTINE M 3044 BROSSMAN STREET NAPERVILLE, IL 60564-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 20-101 26149201304 U RI MBEY, ROBERT A & KAREN J 9111 NAPOLI COURT #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 5-202 26149200169 U RINKER, NANCY DAVID MANIERRE 5219 RAINTREE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8547 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK G LOT 3 60785720001 U ROBERTS TR, P MAPLE LANE TRUST 5219 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 23 60785520007 U ROSSI' CHRISTOPHER SUZANNE MOLINET ROSSI 9376 VERCELLI CT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 33 79904071409 U SAPERSTEIN, MARC & HELENE 463 TENNENT ROAD MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751-- 0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 8-202 26149200402 U SCHACHNER, THOMAS JOSEPH DIANE C SCHACHNER 317 BLUE RUN ROAD CHESWICK, PA 15024--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 23-201 26149201582 U SERGIO GIANGRANDE LIV TRUST 25630 AVE CHATEAUX OAK BROOK, IL 60523--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 14-102 26149200842 U SEVERS, AZELIA M 603 LINCOLN DR MACOMB, IL 61455--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 28-201 26149201980 U SHANDA, LAWRENCE P & BETH A 9130 NAPOLI CT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 10-202 26149200567 U SHERLOCK, MICHAEL & MARIBETH 17148 ACORN RIDGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 11-202 26149200648 U SHERREN, HENRY J & SARAH A EDWARD Q SETO ERMINIA CLAUDIO PO BOX 137 COOPERSBURG, PA 18036--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 27-101 26149201867 U SIRAVO, MARIE E JOSEPH FRANCIS SIRAVO JR 9344 VERCELLI CT NAPLES, FL 34113--0 VERCELLI LOT 25 79904071247 U SNOOK, GREGORY I & RUTH ANN 19419 PEARL DR HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742-0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 9-101 26149200428 U SPILLANE, JOHN J 9118 PRIMA WAY i{201 NAPLES, FL 34113--7775 COACH HOMES AT TREVISO BAY AP ABE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 16-201 26149201029 U STEVE GRAPSAS GTR TRUST 1947 DEWS STREET GLENVIEW, IL 60025--0 COACH HOMES AT TREVISO BAY AP ABE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 22-102 26149201485 U SUN, XIAOFAN QIN MA 1852E 40TH TERRACE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 25-101 26149201702 U SWANFARM LLC 45 CEDAR CREEK ROAD COLCHESTER, VT 05446--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 25-201 26149201744 U SZYMANSKI, BRIAN A KIMBERLY A SZYMANSKI 2681 HASTINGS CT GURNEE, IL 60031--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 26-101 26149201786 U THORN, KENNETH H & DAWN L 9491 NAPOLI LN #201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 19-201 26149201265 U TOBIN, ROB FIT T & JOAN G 9111 NAPOLI CT#101 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 5-101 26149200101 U TORTO, JEFFREY B & DEBORAH A 22 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MELROSE, MA 02176—A COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 7-201 26149200305 U TRABERT, MARK J & LOUANN 52 EMMA WAY EAST AMHERST, NY 14051--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 9-102 26149200444 U TREVENA, JAMES M & LAURA S 9484 NAPOLI LN #201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 30-201 26149202141 U TREVISO BAY PROPERTY OWNERS MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 9800 TREVISO BAY BLVD NAPLES, FL 34113--0 PIACERE-PAVIA TRACT FD-3 LESS BELLA FIRENZE 66748001240 U TSAVARIS, MICHAEL A & MARY C 30 CARLETON AVENUE BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 15-202 26149200965 U TZONEV, TZVETOMIR & TXVETELINA 5209 CYPRESS LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK E LOT 29 60784440007 U UGIANSKY, ROBERT L 11600 QUARTERFIELD RD ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21042-0 COACH HOMES AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 8-101 26149200347 U URCZYK, JEFFEREY & LOIS 3501 SENATE COURT VALENCIA, PA 16059--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 4-101 26149200020 U VACHON, DENNIS J & DOREEN 4350 GAIL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34104--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 5 60784760004 U VAN HOY, ME IN E & LAUREN E 9503 NAPOLI LN #101 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 22-101 26149201469 U VANIER, DENNIS P BEVERLY R NYE 9119 NAPOLI CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 7-202 26149200321 U VIVI NETTO, ANTHONY & LISA 1163 SAGAMORE AVE #65 PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801--D COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 28-101 26149201948 U WENTWORTH ESTATES CDD 2301 NORTHEAST 37TH ST FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33308--0 PIACERE-PAVIA TRACT P-10 66748002029 U WENTWORTH ESTATES CDD 2301 NORTHEAST 37TH ST FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33308--0 VERCELLI TRACT L-3 79904070646 U WETZEL GAIL BIAS & CATHLEEN ELLEN BIAS REV TRUST 9111 NAPOLI CT#201 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 5-201 26149200143 U WILLIAM BENNETT CARPENTRY INC 5224 RAINTREE LANE NAPLES, FL 34113--8521 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK F LOT 3 60784680003 U WILLIAMS, RICKIE JOHN PATRICIA LYNNE WILLIAMS 9502 NAPOLI LN #202 NAPLES, FL 34113--0 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 26-202 26149201841 U WILSON, TROY MICHAEL LEANDRA J PORTER-W ILSON 5151 MAPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--8548 30 50 26 COM NW CDR OF S112, E A N LI OF Si/2 4182.93FT TO POB, CONT E 323.06FT, S 673.75FT, W 323FT, N 672.61 FT 00439640002 U WISSNER, KENNETH I & CARRIE A 9480 NAPOLI LN #101 NAPLES, FL 34113--8119 COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 31-101 26149202183 U ZAEHRINGER, CHARICE PRESTON ANDREW ZAEHRINGER 5203 RAINTREE LN NAPLES, FL 34113--0 MYRTLE COVE ACRES BLK G LOT 1 LESS W t S 30FT OF W 85.38FT LOT 1 60785640000 U 2015 GALANT PROPERTY TRUST 15 KINGSWOOD RD OAKVILLE L6K 2E2 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 31-202 26149202248 F DURST, DANIEL JOHN KAREN ANN LOUISE DURST 8 MARYHEATHER CRESCENT FREELTON LOR 1KO CANADA COACH HOMES AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 25-202 26149201760 F HAGGSTROM, INGEMAR & FAT MA NASBY ALLE 65 TABY 183 55 SWEDEN COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY AP ABE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 11-101 26149200583 F HENRIKSSON ET AL, THOMAS HJORTRONVAGEN 6 SODERTALJE 15252 SWEDEN COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY AP ABE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 15-102 26149200923 F HIGGINS, MARTIN 2151 MARGOT STREET OAKVILLE L6H 3M5 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY AP ABE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 17-202 26149201126 F JOHNSTON, ARTHUR & MARLENE 10 VISTA GARDENS ALISTON L9R OH3 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY AP ABE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 26-102 26149201809 F KOMOROWSKI FLORIDA TRUST 39 LAUREL AVENUE ETOBICOKE M9B 4T1 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY AP ABE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 20-202 26149201362 F MALKIEWICZ, STAN & EVA 18 WISHING WELL CT KLEINBURG LOJ 1CO CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 4-102 26149200046 F MILES, CATHERINE A & PETER H 2O4-300 RANDALL ST OAKVILLE LGJ OG2 CANADA VERCELLI LOT 21 79904071166 F MO RE KEITH D & CAROLYN 181NGLEVIEW DRIVE CALEDON L7C 1P3 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 31-201 26149202222 F RIEGL, GRID 5873 BAGLEY AVE LASALLE N9H 2K6 CANADA VERCELLI LOT 28 79904071302 F ROBINSON, PH ILIP COLEMAN CHRISTINA ROBINSON 455 BELL RD BINBROOK L0R iC0 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 29-202 26149202086 F VI LA NOVA INC 250 WINCOTT DRIVE UNIT 18508 ETOBICOKE M9R 2R5 CANADA VERCELLI LOT 14 79904071027 F ffZ EMILY A 104 GUMMING CT ANCASTER L9G iV3 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 21-201 26149201427 F ZIZZO, EMILY A 104 GUMMING CT ANCASTER L9G iV3 CANADA COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM BLDG 26-201 26149201825 F COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM COACH HOMES I AT TREVISO BAY A PHASE CONDOMINIUM hrdyaresl_Id: 26149200004 79904070248 POLIst_500.rJs 4:3aitu Tcruts PARTOF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Q GRADY MINOR ASSOCIATES PA 3800 VIA DEL REY BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 2l4/2022 Subscribed and sworn to before on February 4th, 2022 PUBLICATION COST: $932.40 AD NO: GC10820454 CUSTOMER NO: 531419 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD W/ MAP 3 X9.25 NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public State of Wisconsin NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITION: PL20210002449 - 5175 Maple Lane Rezone In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a neighborhood meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Wolfgang Gilles (Applicant) will be held February 23, 2022, 5:30 pm at South Regional Library, Meeting Room A, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113. Wolfgang Gilles has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a rezone from the Agricultural Zoning District to the RSF-4 Zoning District to allow a maximum of 16 single family residential dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of 5.3± acres and is located at 5175 Maple Lane in Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Raintres LH Maple N Cypress LN SUBJECT � PROPERTY R�r s If you have questions or comments, contact Sharon Umpenhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or phone: 239-947-1144. For project information or to register to participate remotely* go to, gradyminor.com/Planning. Any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The applicant and GradyMinor are not responsible for technical issues. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. nD-GCJ082 a -oi NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20210002449 — 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***�iease be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency, If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: �s� ! k Z—lr�V EMAIL: To ��(�� L�wt�►4S • N� / -_5 a�5:.�11 �� /L 4' S I' as PHONE: NAME: D e a ri i 'e MCI EMAIL: ADDRESS* `' � r e- S s PHONE: - 3 , " " 2 e: - Z 7 S t✓ NAME: KgAw y()VV1EMAIL: r e rj S!0 1 Oc Ft,eo;., ADDRESS: r Z y0 V) fy_Ct (QVV— PHONE: Z 3 q 23 /VO4 , � 3`( r� 3 l NAME: ~ EMAIL: �,� h� _I JeCN1 h,`n e ),e r jt Su �' r°a f�C• �r �rtv ADDRESS: �b ga"A lret L' PHONE: 131 g5-D , g Z 'i 3 3 NAME: EMAIL:Y q (y ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: I11 pe EMAIL: ADDRESS-�-� � �' p �^e 5 S PHONT $ 269 NAME: 65kEMAIL: ADDRESS: �Z in � ' � PHONE: � q � NAME: EMAIL: 10 ADDR, �Q'Y�Y� ko, PHONE:q' 7-7 NIM Sign -in Sheet 02/23/2022 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20210002449 — 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY 'kense be no(V�seof*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: f[ ��f% � EMAIL: 1 �l}jF �l l�� S jl ii / 1 i P lit LI !1 n � L 1 !" �/ % � V L� `f �' `✓ i ADDRESS: L PHA E , bA4 NA E: , _ a 1. y -1 . EMAIL: ADDRESS: LJ 5 SC U.`L� PHONE:. 000fto rIAP (� r[ � [J 3g11 NAME: J tiZS::k_nnC RnLb i hS EMAIL:SOZAVIY)LC K C pg ohs?� C Uv� ADDRESS.5la �y � � � PHONE: Jft� av _0QWN1 j,;-_qb'Ip NAME: ' EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: lm-U I J Zti EMAIL: ADDRESS: �,—n (/n PHONE: NAME: ce ,,, /� �C MAIL: LJ S 6 ADDRESS: cl r1 % +�v HONE: 4-� Q % k-Li _ r2 .1 dam! NAME: Z a U 4c V1[poet a 1,13 ADDRESS:{ - EMAIL: a�a�a�t PHONE: r 7 y C0We44y—, F-Lf, � --3z(.6 N I M Sign -in Sheet 02/23/2022 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20210002449 - 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***�iease be aolvised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: i�& [W i �M .,i� EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: ADDRESS: EMAIL: —t/ k PHONE: 0)_W1 i P/-P1 ?I i }/, iYln rl �%I NAME: �' EMAIL: ADDRESS: C^� 'f]-,I_�PHONE: 7 �� NAME: EMAIL: r,,yAJ ULL 19_1)ELL(:F— rplimfc_. cam ADDRESS: 6--Z f I 8 PHONE: 2-3 p„ 3 3( --Q314 NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: 2J vLAI NPHONE: / ! NAME: K e r q L" ut EMAIL: 1, �1U m y ,5�0 ADDRESS: S��,k�S n�� L PHONE: Ssq C� rn�A'u NAME: t\ /� , �1�e 1\ UA �_ a � EMAIL: ry- , �l L Ch �� 2 Cc, �-G\ ADDRESS: "�, ai \ �I L n' PHONE:-- 1' �SD NIM Sign -in Sheet 02/23/2022 Cjc�kc� fi � a� s MAP le Ll �a51 jU ct p (C_ LYi ��c61e�g�-6 0�C� Q ,caM m)ccx, (�� Kbvv, , C�\��l v z 23G -200 b3!Z Sri Sc� �jof lc- Ln Sa�� Palle l,n 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (PL20210002449) February 23, 2022 NIM - Zoom Participants First Name Last Name Email Address Jim Kenyon kenyon1524@yahoo.com 9480 NAPOLI LN, APT 102 Steve Barger bargpet@gmail.com 9464 Napoli Ln Michael Delate mdelate@gradyminor.com 3800 via del Rey Bonita springs Diane Lynch diane.lynch @colliercountyfLgov 2800 N Horseshoe Dr PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Speaker: Good evening, everybody. We're gonna get the meeting started. My name's Wayne Arnold I'm a planner with Q. Grady Minor and Associates. And with me tonight, Jim Banks, our traffic engineer. Sharon Umpenhour is with our firm; she's recording the meeting and running the presentation. And then, we have Mike Delate, one of our civil engineers who's participating by Zoom. He was not feeling well tonight so, he'll be speaking to you from the computer, if we have any questions for him. So, all I ask is that we talk one at a time. We have to record the meeting for the county so, if we could be courteous to each other and speak one at a time. We're gonna do a short presentation and then have question and answer. If we could get you to speak into the microphone so we can make sure the recording equipment picks up on it. We have to provide a transcript of the meeting to Collier County Government as part of our requirement. So, with that, I'm gonna get started with a short presentation. So, do you wanna activate that for me? [00:01:00] So, the subject property, you're probably familiar with, it's on the end of Maple Lane. And it's to the west of US 41. It's a little over 5 acres, it's about 5.3 acres. Its curb is zoned agriculture and we're in the process to rezone that to RSF-4 Zoning, which is consistent with the balance of the zoning along all of the streets Raintree, Maple, Cypress, etcetera. And that process takes us through a review process by Collier County Government. We're required to hold this neighborhood information meeting after we receive comments back from the county and then hold the meeting. We share our ideas with you, listen the feedback. Staff s here at the back. I should've mentioned Laura DeJohn and Ray Bellows, who are your county government. And they're involved in the review of this application. So, they're here to take some notes and listen in to what's said as well. So anyway, we're in the process of rezoning the nursery property. [00:02:01] For up to 16 single family homes, which is the density of three units per acre, which is consistent with the density with the rest of the community. I'm assuming most of you all live in the notice area along one of the streets. So, you're familiar obviously with the property and the location. So again, we're required in order to convert from agriculture. It's a rezone application. We'll have this neighborhood information meeting. We'll make resubmittals back to the county that'll eventually get scheduled for planning commission, and then ultimately the Board of County Commissioners. Page 1 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript We don't have hearing dates established yet, but that would be the process that we go through. And I have some contact information at the end or if anybody wants a copy of the presentation, Sharon's contact information is at the end slide. You can get that information, or her business cards are here, and you can email her if you have any issue. Whatever information you like. So again, the RSF-4 Zoning allows for single family homes and that's what we would be proposing to put there. [00:03:00] The maximum density is 16 units over the entire 5.3 acres. Development standards for RSF-4 requires 75 foot and 70-foot lots, depending on whether or not you're a corner lot. It's got minimum requirements for one- and two-story buildings and then established pretty standard building setbacks. Twenty-five feet front, 7 '/2 feet to the side yard and rear yard's 25 feet. Those are the standards that we would be subject to. We've developed a small conceptual plan. This is not necessarily the final plan. This depicts 13 lots, and this allows us to put single-family lots that meet the minimum standards. We've got a couple water management tracts. We're still looking into the water management details. We might be able to get one more lot on here. We probably can't reach the maximum 16. But that's the concept. It would be a hammerhead design is what that's called. Female Speaker: Are you taking questions after the presentation? [00:04:001 Speaker: Yes, ma'am. After the presentation. Female Speaker: Okay, I will need to address — Speaker: Okay. We'll take your question. Absolutely. So, it's essentially a cul-de-sac design with a hammerhead at the bottom that accesses Maple Lane. And we have lots that are along that, it'll be a plat that's a road tract. So, we would be required to plat this property in order to sell individual lots for sale. So again, the surrounding zoning, you can see that we have, obviously Treviso Bay is to the west and to the north and south. But to the east, it's primarily RSF- 4 Zoning, which is the zoning district that we're requesting. So, we believe we're consistent with the surrounding zoning. We're consistent with the growth management plan. And we think it's a very compatible project to convert the Page 2 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript commercial nursery into a small housing development. So, here's our contact information. The contact information for Q. Grady Minor and Associates. [00:05:01 ] There's Sharon's email address and phone number. There's a link to our planning department webpage that has this presentation available on it. Or if you'd like to call or email Sharon, she can make sure you get a copy of that presentation or any of the materials we've submitted to Collier County Government. So, that's a brief presentation of where we are. And I'd be happy to answer questions if you have them. And all I'd ask is that we speak into the microphone for the questions so everybody can hear, and we can get it on record. So, if you wanna come forward with any of your questions, one at a time, that would be great. Yes, sir? Gary: Yeah, what's the setback — Ray Bellows: State your name, please. Gary: Gary Mahathat (sp). What's the setback on the back of the lots that back up to the pond? There's landscaping there now, is that gonna be taken down or is there certain amount of property that's gonna remain... [00:06:00] Wayne: Right now, you're talking about the pond to the north, that's in Treviso Bay? Gary: Yes. Wayne: Yeah, there's a 50-foot drainage easement that separates us from that lake. And there's some vegetation. I honestly don't know what that vegetation is, if it's exotic vegetation, we have to remove it. If it's native vegetation, I'm sure we can work that out with part of the required buffer that we have for the project. Gary: So, is there potential that that would be taken down and the lots that would be on that northern most part would be opened up to the pond? Wayne: So, on the left of the screen here, you can see there's an existing 50-foot drainage easement that separates us. The county was actually just out there this week doing some maintenance on the canal. I don't know if any of the vegetation was impacted this week. But we are required to remove any exotic vegetation that Page 3 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript exists. And we obviously would try to leave anything we could between the lot lines. But I don't believe that we're going to be allowed to do anything on this drainage easement. [00:06:59] Gary: So, you're not gonna be selling those lots as lake view lots? Or you don't know? Wayne: I don't know, but they're not gonna be lots today [inaudible] [00:07:071 today. Gary: Yeah. Okay. Speaker: All right. Thank you. Yes, ma'am? Can you come forward please and be on the microphone? Heather: Absolutely. Personally, I just had a quick recommendation. Since you went through those slides very quickly and I didn't — Ray Bellows: Can you state your name, please? Heather: Heather Dawn Loki. And what I was saying is, when I was going through the laws, or as you were going through your slide show, some people were having questions that were popping in their head and switch to another one. Is it possible that you could just start back from the first one and then ask if anyone has a question based on what, are there eight slides? And that might be a little easier. Wayne: I think it would be more efficient if people just asked the questions that they have and for me to go back through the presentation. I'm happy to go back or forward as we need to, but I would prefer to answer questions as people have them, other than go through the presentation again. Heather: All right. [00:08:00] Wayne: Yes, ma'am? Tiara: Tiara Arthur. Can you go to the lot of the design aspect right now? I would like to mention that all of these neighbors, right here on this lot are not perpendicular with each other but are perpendicular with my property. And my husband's property, that we have two. So, Lot Design 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, we will have an immediate Page 4 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript access to our backyard. That's an invasion of privacy and I'm sure on Lots 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8 will also be an invasion of my other neighbors that, we're very concerned about that aspect. The second question that I have is the water management issue that we have on Raintree and Maple Lane with flooding. It is extremely crucial with many of the people here having homes that have been established in this neighborhood and it was never taken care of with the southwest or the management plan that goes on the perimeter of our neighborhood. [00:09:06] I'm very concerned with that. Wayne: Okay. Yeah, that's why we have an engineer that's part of the design team. And just so you know — Tiara: So, what're the answers to that? I know you have an engineer, but what're those answers? Yes. Wayne: Okay. If I can answer you, I certainly will. Tiara: Please. Speaker: Okay. So, with regard to your first comment about having immediate neighbors, there's an existing 30-foot drainage easement that separates you from the nearest home. That to the top of the page, it's a 30-foot drainage easement that runs north and south and then it becomes a 50-foot drainage easement that runs east -west. So, those lots are separated from you by a canal, this 30- foot-wide easement area. Male Speaker: What? Nah. Tiara: Okay. Hang on. So, I just wanna make sure that that is containment of your water. Wayne: That is an existing county canal. Tiara: Okay. That is not actually in existence. This is actually residential owned and managed. [00:10:00] And we have proof of all of these communications with the district, that it is not actually managed by the county at all. Wayne: Okay. I'd be happy to look at any of that information. You haven't provided it to me. Page 5 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Tiara: I think you need to do your due diligence first before stating that that 30-foot easement is something that will be taken care of, because it is not. Wayne: It's an existing, recorded drainage easement. Tiara: Not by the original — after they did the modifications. [Crosstalk] Speaker: They've [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:10:23]. Tiara: After they did the modifications to the storm water drain, it was forgotten about. Avia: [Inaudible]. Wayne: Hang on. We have to get you on the microphone. Tiara: Do you wanna state your name? Avia: [Inaudible]. Tiara: Well, you have to state your name, because this is your property. Male Speaker: [Inaudible]. Avia: This is [inaudible] neighborhood. It's three times a year, 16 inch the water in my house, inside. Tiara: Already. Avia: With the city coming — Sharon: Microphone, please. Wayne: Can you speak closer to the microphone, please? Avia: [Inaudible] [00:11:00]. [00:11:001 Speaker: That's okay, we're just not picking you up on the microphone. Avia: Is the city coming my house, is everything put in there [inaudible] [00:11:081 is nothing good. Yes. I don't need even more waters coming in my house. Page 6 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: Right. Avia: I have three houses, the same street. Wayne: Okay. Well, let me have Mike Delate. Mike, can you hear us, Mike? Avia: [Inaudible]. Sixteen water, inside the house. Mike: [Inaudible] can hear you [inaudible]. Sharon: Oh, it's coming out. Speaker: So, Mike, the questions is really about water management and the canal easement that's on our east property line and on the north property line and what we're going to do with our water management. You might just try to speak up really loud and I'll try to repeat whatever is not audible to the audience. Mike: [Inaudible]. Sharon: It's coming out the again. Female Speaker: It's unintelligible. Speaker: Yeah, Mike. We're not picking you up. [00:12:001 Female Speaker: Who is Mike? Speaker: This is Mike Delate, he's a professional engineer for our firm that's doing the subdivision. Female Speaker: [Inaudible] [00:12:07]? Mike: Almost. Wayne: That's a little better Mike, but we're still having trouble picking you up. Try again. Male Speaker: Why don't we have him call your phone, then you can hold your phone up to the microphone. Yeah. Speaker: Do you think you just have a problem Page 7 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Sharon: Mike, can you hear us? Mike: I can hear you, Sharon. Sharon: Okay, here. Yep. Speaker: Okay. Try to talk again loud enough so we can pick you up. Mike: Yeah, [inaudible]. Wayne: Yeah, it's not gonna be audible. You wanna try to call into my cellphone and I'll try to play it. Okay. Any other questions besides drainage at the moment, I can take that. Audience: Yes. [Crosstalk] [00:13:001 Wayne: [Inaudible — crosstalk] one at a time, please. Please, we have to record this. We can't have outbursts in the audience, please. Katy: Good evening, my name is Katy Esquival [inaudible — crosstalk] I live on Raintree Lane. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: [Inaudible — crosstalk]. Katy: What is your plan for ingress and egress for the roughly 26 cars that're gonna be using this one access road to come and go from the neighborhood? Wayne: Yes, our legal access is Maple Lane, just as the nursery has used for years. And it's a public road. Katy: It certainly is, but the nursery did not have 26-plus vehicles coming and going all day every day down Maple Lane. Female Speaker: Yes. Katy: In addition to the fact that you and I both know that as soon as this is built, you're gonna put in an access road using Raintree, because this is gonna be too congested and it's not sufficient to have the traffic be coming in and out of this project. Page 8 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: Why don't, Jim you wanna just address the traffic and what you analyzed and what your findings were? How about that? [00:14:001 Jim: For the record, Jim Banks. Yeah, we analyzed the potential 16 homes to be located at this site. Katy: Right, I'm aware of that. Jim: And 16 homes will generate 18 two-way trips during peak hour. That's typical of a 16-home subdivision will generate 18 two-way trips in peak hour. There are — Katy: Eighteen vehicles making two-way trips? Jim: Eighteen vehicle trips in and out. If you were to stand by your mailbox, you would see about one vehicle every three minutes, drive by — Katy: Actually, I don't. Jim: Well, if you'll let me respond to you, then you can respond to me. Katy: Certainly. Jim: Okay. So, this is how we do it. We analyzed it and we're gonna have an additional one vehicle, every three minutes on Maple Lane because the 16 additional homes on that street. Currently there's what? Twenty-five to 30 homes on Maple Lane? Male Speaker: It's a dead end. [00:14:591 Jim: Currently, there's 25 to 30 single family homes on Maple Lane. We're talking about adding an additional 15 homes. You're implying that additional 15 homes will generate significantly more traffic than what is [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:15:13] — [Crosstalk] Katy: Yes. Jim: How can there be more traffic generated from the 15 homes than the 25 homes that're already — Page 9 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Katy: That's not the reason, it's at the end of the street. And because it's going to be insufficient. Jim: Okay. Katy: Excuse me, please go back. Jim: Okay, so I'll acknowledge your comment and we will address it accordingly at the time of the hearing. Katy: I have a Ring camera. I can watch the cars that come up and down Raintree Lane and I can assure you, as much as I'm standing here with breath in my body, that there is not a car that drives by every three minutes. In addition to the fact that all of my neighbors who live on Maple Lane, this is going to be to increase their traffic minimally, by a third. [00:15:591 By having all of these units at the end of their street. That is gonna fundamentally change the neighborhood, as well as Maple Lane. And once you realize that Maple Lane is insufficient to provide enough ingress and egress for these units, you're then gonna wanna open up Raintree Lane to provide an alternate means of ingress and egress for this property. Jim: There's no plan to access Raintree. Katy: As we sit here today. Female: As of right now. As of right now. But watch. Katy: Oh, you think it's funny because you don't live here. Why don't I start driving [00:16:321 25 cars up and down your road and you can see how much [inaudible]. Jim: Ma'am, I live on a two-lane street. It's 1 mile long. There are 60 homes on that street. That's the street I live on. Katy: That's great, we don't. Female Speaker: We didn't buy on that. We didn't buy there. Female Speaker: We like our neighborhood just the way it is. Female Speaker: We all bought our neighborhood the way it is [inaudible]. Wayne: Excuse me. We're gonna talk one at a time. We're not gonna yell Page 10 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript at each other, we're gonna have a dialogue. I'm gonna answer your questions. Female Speaker: We're speaking. Wayne: We can agree to disagree on things too. [00:17:00] Female Speaker: We have to talk about the [inaudible]. Wayne: Ma'am. Ma'am. Please. [Crosstalk] Katy: That is not including the traffic. Wayne: You're out of order. Ma'am. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: [Inaudible]. Jim: I think we're done. I think [inaudible] [00:17:121. Katy: This is also in addition to the fact that Raintree and Maple all flow currently, with the existing construction that is on those units. On those streets. The addition of this project going to further create additional flooding. It is not being property managed now and this is only gonna make it worse. Because you and I both know the elevation of these units is gonna be substantially higher than both Raintree and Maple and we are all gonna be having significantly more flooding problems. Wayne: Okay. Katy: So, unless your property owner is willing to insure my home for the inevitable flooding, I can't imagine why you would think this would be a benefit to our neighborhood. Instead of a nursery. Instead of a nursery. Why is this even being added? Wayne: Ma'am, I'm not going to debate you. [00:18:001 I am not going to debate either one of you. Female Speaker: [Inaudible]. Page 11 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: I'm going to listen to your questions. Katy: I'm asking questions. Wayne: And I'm trying to give you — Katy: There's a lot of questions you're not answering, though. Wayne: Okay, I can't come prepared because I don't know what questions [inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Katy: It's not like [inaudible] my previous question. Speaker: And I'm telling you I have our engineer right here on the phone to answer your questions. I'm try to make sure you're being heard. Female Speaker: We could make a meeting — Wayne: Ma'am, would you mind sitting down? Female Speaker: No, she shouldn't. She still has a comment, she should stay. Speaker: We'll come back to you. We're gonna have the question [inaudible] [00:18:341 she asked about [inaudible]. Female Speaker: Wow. Katy: I already asked my question on water management. The next question that I have for traffic is in result to directly affecting us is the current project that's happening on 41 that will indirectly affect our neighborhood as well. With the traffic that's also already occurring from the AutoZone, the tire dealership, the golf carts. [00:19:00] It's not an accurate description of what you're deciding for us. Jim: Okay, acknowledged. Thank you. Suzanne: My name is Suzanne Robbins. I don't know if you've walked down Myrtle Lane, but it's a very narrow road. Those cars have to stop and swerve around mailboxes. You can't pass. Jim: Okay. Suzanne: And you walk a dog, you've gotta be clear over. So then, the traffic Page 12 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript coming out of Myrtle has got to go on Tamiami court out to 41, because that's the only street that they can do a left. Female Speaker: Yep. Suzanne: Already, right now because of Season. They need a light there. I can't get out. Male Speaker: That's right. Jim: Thank you. Female Speaker: And being afraid of being rear ended. Of getting into our traffic. Wayne: Ma'am, please. You're [inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Tiara: Sir, this is a very serious issue. Wayne: I understand that. Tiara: I am [inaudible] [00:19:37]. Male Speaker: If she's gonna hijack the meeting, we need to [inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Tiara: Female Speaker: Wayne: Tiara: [00:20:02] Wayne: [Crosstalk] I am [inaudible] my voice up. Absolutely. Ma'am. You'll have an opportunity to ask another question. I'd like to be fair to everybody in the room and let other people ask a question — I would be very neighborly if everybody involved that has questions. One at a time [inaudible — crosstalk]. Page 13 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Tiara: [Inaudible — crosstalk] to ask these. Speaker: And what I'm gonna do is ask Mike Delate if he can try to describe our water management design. And let's see if we can bring that up and let everybody [inaudible]. Mike, can you [inaudible]? Try to go ahead. Mike: Can everybody hear me? Tiara: Not at all, no. [Crosstalk] Wayne: Mike: Female Speaker: Speaker: Tiara: Male Speaker: Mike: Tiara: Speaker: Tiara: Wayne: Tiara: Wayne: [00:21:00] Why don't you say it a little bit, I'll try to repeat what you're saying. [Inaudible] . [Inaudible] [00:20:29] . Okay, so the question — Mike, let me just go back. So, Mike Delate our civil engineer is saying that there are land development requirements for drainage. There's also Southwest Florida Water Management criteria that he will be designing to. So, it's not in progress though? Wow. [Inaudible] storage. [Inaudible]. Okay, so — You're trying to prove something that hasn't been actually been thought of yet. Ma'am, please. I've asked you numerous times. Is that not the truth. We are in the first stage of zoning the piece of property. Page 14 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Tiara: I feel like this should be already thought out. Wayne: Hang on. Laura DeJohn from the county? Let me let Laura interject here. Female Speaker: Yes, I think [inaudible]. Laura: This is just a quick explanation. I'm Laura John, I'm here on behalf of Collier County. We do the review of this application, as you've been told with the first round of submittal, the county makes comments. This meeting gets held. All of this information has to be reported. And we have to be able to display to the next level of decision makers, that's the planning commission and the board of county commissioners that this meeting happened. And we need to have a clear record of what is said, and by whom. That is why you've been told over and over again to please, try to bring the volume down, bring the energy down. Have your chance when your name is called, or you are called. [00:22:00] To speak into the microphone, stating your name. And then the county commissioners will understand what happened at this meeting. Otherwise, it will be garbled and unclear and your voices will not be heard. Wayne: Ma'am, I have an idea — Avia: Okay, my name is Avia [inaudible] [00:22:191. Okay? The two of you do not [inaudible]? This is [inaudible]? Laura: Yes. [Inaudible]. Avia: Yes. Put in the work order. Three times it's six inches and coming the water. Laura: Yes. Avia: My guest house is flooded. Laura: Yes. Avia: [Inaudible] two times at my house. For instance, [inaudible]. Laura: Okay. Avia: [Inaudible]. Laura: So, it's on record that you have concerns about flooding. Page 15 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Avia: Yeah, it is [inaudible]. Male Speaker: [Inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Avia: [Inaudible — crosstalk] [00:22:43]. Wayne: Excuse me. [Inaudible — crosstalk] Male Speaker: concern as well. [00:22:581 Laura: So, does everyone have a clear message that, it's only going to work if you, one at a time, speak into the microphone, please. Thank you. Wayne: And let me just say, so Mike Delate is still on the line and Mike, can you just describe what we're going to be doing on -site for water management, so we don't impact the neighboring property owners? Mike: [Inaudible]? Wayne: Yes. Mike: So, we have to contain a [inaudible]. Katy: We can't hear it. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: Tell him to speak closer to the microphone. Wayne: So, we're required to contain a 25-year, three day storm event on site. Female: How many inches of water is that? Wayne: Mike, do you know how many inches that is? Mike: It's roughly [inaudible]. Page 16 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: It's roughly 11 inches of rain. Mike: [Inaudible] . Wayne: So, right. And as much as we have not started the engineering design to the water management district yet. This is the first step in the process, to rezone property. It's not uncommon that we go through the zoning process and then we establish all the engineering details. The property, as zoned today, it's zoned agriculture with agricultural buildings there. [00:24:001 Nobody gets a say about it other than the review staff at the county to make sure it complies with the water management criteria, the setbacks and things like that. That's what happens once we rezone this to RSF-4 and the homes get designed to contain the water management system. [Crosstalk] Katy: When do you mean it's rezoned? Wayne: Ma'am, do you mind? Please, I don't like the interruptions. [Crosstalk] Katy: No, you're assuming that it's gonna go through. You're saying it as if it's a fact and the purpose of this is — Wayne: Ma'am, I'm not going to debate you at this meeting. This is an informational meeting. This is not a public hearing. Katy: You're saying, when it's rezoned. Wayne: Yes. I'm saying, when it's rezoned. It's in the urban area it qualifies for three units a neighbor. What we're asking for is consistent with that. We have water and sewer available at the site. Yes, it makes sense for 16 units to be on the site. Male Speaker: [Inaudible]. Speaker: Yes, sir. Please. Dean: Okay, my name's Dean Brunner. Can we go back to your concept plan? Female Speaker: Can I [inaudible] up a little bit? I can't hear anything. Page 17 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript [00:25:001 Dean: It's hard for me to see, but is that 7.5 feet from the lot lines between each house? Wayne: Yes, that's the minimum required set back. Dean: If you look at the overall neighborhood, I believe it's a lot more than that between the houses. Okay, so you're putting these houses much closer together. 2.) Can we go back to the overall neighborhood plan? Wayne: You wanna see that one or you wanna — Dean: Yeah, that — that's fine. Wayne: Okay. Dean: Okay, now over on Cypress, on I guess it's the east side of Cypress, those lots are 1 acre lots. On the other side of Cypress, they're at least a half an acre probably. Okay? And if you're on the cul-de-sac, it's a lot bigger. [00:25:551 Okay now, my question is, if that property gets rezoned for 16 units, the property next door to him, which is vacant now, what keeps him from getting his rezoned for 16 [inaudible — crosstalk]? [Crosstalk] Katy: It's not vacant. Wayne: Yeah, that parcel's not vacant. There's structures on it that's agricultural zoned as well. They would have to come back through the same process that we're going through to change the zoning. Dean: Yeah, well there are structures on the property you wanna rezone, too. So, the point is, if that could be used as an argument, well they got this rezoning, why can't I get it? So, we're talking a potential maybe of 32 new homes, right? Female Speaker: Yep. Wayne: No. We're talking about 16 — Page 18 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript [Crosstalk] Katy: Yes, we are. Yes, we are. Dean: Now, can we go back another one. Now, Mr. Delate, is he here? Speaker: Mr. Dotes? Dean: Yeah. Speaker: I'm not sure that that is — Dean: It's that guy with the — [Crosstalk] Katy: The overgrown property? Yes, he's not present. Of course. Dean: Do you know what he paid for this lot? Speaker: I do not know. Dean: I heard it was — [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: That's on the books. [00:27:00] [Inaudible — crosstalk] [00:27:001. Wayne: Ma'am, I'm not gonna take these. I'm gonna ask you to leave the room. [Crosstalk] Katy: You know it's the truth. Wayne: I'm gonna ask you to leave the room because you can't keep interrupting people. [Crosstalk] Katy: You don't see it? I better leave in handcuffs then. Dean: I heard he bought the property in August. Page 19 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: Okay. Dean: Okay, which is just less than a half year ago. Now, what would it be worth with the rezoning? Wayne: I don't know. Dean: Wouldn't be $600,000.00 now, what would you think? Wayne: I have no idea. Dean: Well, you're not giving me a lot of answers. Wayne: I don't have an answer for the cost. I don't know the pricing of the homes [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:27:281. [Crosstalk] Dean: Well, does he plan to develop or is he gonna resell it? Wayne: I think he intends to develop the property, yes. Dean: Where's he live? Wayne: I don't know where he lives. Dean: He doesn't live here. Or he doesn't live on this neighborhood. Wayne: No, he doesn't. Dean: So, he's not affected by it? Wayne: Well, he made a land investment, obviously. Dean: Well, I mean, we all get land investments. We wanna keep ours, our value. Katy: Yes. Right. Dean: Okay? We don't want multi -family or maybe single residence, but when you put them that close together, it's the same zone basically. [00:28:011 Wayne: It's the exact same zoning that's on the rest of the street. Page 20 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Female Speaker: Yeah. Wayne: That's the answer that I can give you. Dean: Does that include roadways and easements and stuff like that? I think if you look at the houses on the rest of the community, I think there's a lot more room around them. Wayne: And there may be, given the age and they were constructed years ago, maybe they were. Dean: There's new houses being built that're beautiful that seem to have bigger yards and more easement and [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:28:281. [Crosstalk] Wayne: Well, at the end of the day, these could too. If you remember, I said this is a conceptual layout to the site. It's not a design, it's not in for subdivisional agreement with the county. Those are the minimum standards that the county accepts for that as the language. Dean: Okay. Last question. Now, I've dealt with this on my other properties. After [inaudible] that, and you say 11 inches of water, it's hard for me to believe that it's that much, because I've heard after a half an inch, it's anybody's water. But if it is 11 inches, what happens? Are they gonna build a lake on it, to hold it? [00:29:001 Wayne: On that conceptual plan that we have? Dean: Yeah. What's that lake? Wayne: What we designed, it's called Tract B. It's designed to be a detention area, it's not a wet pond, per say. But it's designed to be a dry detention area. Dean: Dry? And that's gonna hold 11 inches of water? Wayne: It will be designed to contain the 25 year 3 day storm event with a discharge rate that the county finds acceptable [inaudible] now. We're surrounded on two sides by drainage easements. Page 21 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Dean: Yeah. No, on the Maple [inaudible] traveling? Wayne: I believe Mike, if you can hear me, are we discharging to the north, do you know, or to the west? North and west? Mike: Well, [inaudible] [00:29:391 but whatever [inaudible] construction. Wayne: Right. It's probably going to be the northeast corner; we're discharging that water both west and south. Dean: Well, I know that — can you go back to the main [inaudible] [00:29:481 I'm sorry. Okay, now [inaudible]. [00:29:59] Okay, so I built on the west side of Cypress Lane, after you have a lot of rain. Not so much towards the east, but on the west end, those houses, those lots will be flooded. Now, maybe they haven't gone into the house, but those lots are flooded. And I would imagine the same thing happens on Maple and Raintree, but I definitely know it's on Cypress, because I've lived on Cypress. So, if you're gonna be dumping into that cut out. See, all those run into that canal that runs on the western side of that development, okay? There's a canal that goes there and turns and it goes back out. This is going to back up that canal much quicker and it's gonna slow drainage on Cypress and it's probably on Maple and Raintree also. So, there is an issue there. Just because you're allowed to dump it in the canal, doesn't mean you don't affect the homes all [inaudible]. [00:31:02] Wayne: No, no. That's why the water management district, they look for impact that go beyond our site. We have to design it to accept water that's coming onto our site today. And designed from a criteria that they have in their, we call it basis of review. Dean: Well, I mean this sounds nice but in reality, it backs up. Wayne: Okay. Well, we appreciate that and we're gonna have to look at that issue when we get to our engineering design. Thank you. Yes, ma'am? Leandra: Yes, my name is Leandra Wilson. Hello, Mike Delate. Your name was Mr. Banks? And you work with? Page 22 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: Jim Banks. He owns his own transportation engineer company in town. Leandra: Okay. Wayne: JMB Transportation. Leandra: Was the name of that company on those slides? Wayne: Yes. Leandra: Okay. So, you did a feasibility study for all three streets basically there, as far as adding ours into the neighborhood? Jim: I did not look at your specific streets. [00:31:561 I looked at the capacity on US-41 to see if there was capacity to accept the additional traffic of the 16 residence. The reason we did not do an assessment of the traffic demands on Maple or any of those other residential streets is because the traffic volumes — Wayne: Talk louder. Jim: The traffic volumes are fairly low on those streets today. And so, the additional 16, 18 trips an hour would not degrade the capacity of those roads. Leandra: If you don't live there, that's not your neighborhood. Okay, thank you for your information. Another thing is, have you been in our neighborhoods, in the streets? Wayne: I have. I've lived here for over 30 years. Leandra: But I mean recently, have you been in our neighborhood and have you had to pull over to the side to let cars pass. So, streets are an issue with extra cars there. and I think it's very important that the city hears our concerns, with Collier County Planning. If we wanted to live in a neighborhood where our neighbors were 7 %2 feet away, we would've bought in a neighborhood where our neighbors were 7 '/z feet away. [00:33:01 ] We've purchased here long before this gentleman bought this property for a reason. We live in the opposite 5 acres next to the stated property where you're wanting to add in up to 16 homes. And there is a severe water, flooding issue. And I can't imagine by the time they bring in all the fill for all of those new homes, how Page 23 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript that's gonna affect us next door, let alone all the neighbors down the road when the water retains in the ditches. So, but like I said, I just really wanted to make sure the county is hearing us. Do we, as citizens, on Raintree, Maple and Cypress have any impact in regards to your planning? Do you take our voices into consideration in any of this? [00:34:001 And please, in further detail, if you could tell us the staff, what goes through within the city, or the county, I would appreciate it. Thanks. Laura: Okay, Laura DeJohn, on behalf of Collier County. The first question was, I remember the second one. The first one was, so will the neighbor's voices be factored into the evaluation. So, yes. there's a set of criteria that all rezoning applications must be compared against. The land volume code is what dictates how re - zonings get evaluated. Staff only gives a recommendation; we don't get to make a final decision. The recommendations prepared in comparison to those rezoning criteria go to the planning commission. The planning commission is a volunteer group appointed by the board of county commissioners. [00:35:00] And there's seven members. They consider all the merits of the application; they consider the staff recommendation based on this criteria I mentioned. And they listen to the recording of this meeting. And we summarize the discussion that occurs at this meeting. They make a recommendation. And their vote and recommendation goes to the board of county commissioners. The board of county commissioners is the five -member board that you all elect. And they make the final decision, based on it. Leandra: Leandra Wilson again. Can we have the names of that planning committee, that we could provide information to on our own? Wayne: You can. Yes, they're available on the county website. Leandra: Okay. Wayne: Laura can provide their contact information. They regularly get emails on projects, so they're accustomed to that. Leandra: Yes, I would like to have the names or to know where to find those. [00:36:00] Page 24 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Female Speaker: Yeah. Wayne: Thank you. Yes, ma'am? Kat: Kat Corey. Wayne: Hi. Kat: I'm from the Perez J. Household. I've worked in the housing and housing — Wayne: Can you speak a just little closer to that, please? Thank you. Kat: I've worked in the housing and housing related fields for my entire Naples career. And basically, people are pretty upset, you can tell. The concerns are valid. While you say you've done the study, doing studies and actually living somewhere are different. And you know that, because I can do a study in your neighborhood, but it doesn't mean it's actually what's really going on with the nitty gritty. Traffic on Maple Lane is pretty tight. Getting two cars by is pretty hard. And exiting our community is relatively dangerous, I think everyone can agree to the type of Treviso Bay accident prone. You're crossing three lanes of traffic. [00:36:561 And with 16 homes, average of two cars per home, you're looking at, at least 32 additional vehicles. My house has four. And many other people in this community have a minimum of four vehicles. Your kids need them to get to school, etcetera. So, while your numbers are okay, they're not really factual because you're not there living it every day, in and out. Another thing, water goes from the top of the street to the bottom of the street, per the watershed. So, when you build a new community and the property is at 5 feet above right now, according to Collier County Code. They are not 5 feet above. So, this 5-foot wall is now gonna block and their single-family home will be a swimming pool. So, I really, you guys really need to take all of this into consideration because we have massive water issues back there. We flood with a rainstorm every, what's the one again in May [inaudible]. But anyway, these are facts that we need to take into consideration. [00:38:04 ] No emotion, just facts. Wayne: And we do. Kat: Yeah. Page 25 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: And I appreciate your comments. We do. Jim's traffic analysis is based on the county criteria that they require all projects to be analyzed against our water management design then we evaluate it by Collier County and the water management district. We have to take into consideration what's storable, considerations that're going on with the street. So, I'm not sure that [inaudible] [00:38:211 we won't have that negative impact that you all perceive, and we all believe this, we hear this on many different projects when we're rezoning properties because you all have the same concerns that many of your other neighbors in other parts of the community do. A lot of questions about flooding. Excuse us. Can we be quiet there, please? So, you're expressing concerns that we hear from other people around the community. So, we're accustomed to dealing with those and we certainly will be required to deal with those when we get into the design of the project. Yes, sir? Charlie: Okay, so I'm Charlie Wilson. I live on the 5 acres next to that 5 acres. [00:39:001 So, like everyone else has said, there's places in the road where we have to pull over and let other people pass. I mean, the mailboxes are so close. And then, all three streets that they wanna turn left onto 41, they have to take a right and go all the way out by the Advance Auto Parts to take a left. And then, the way that's situated, we have to wait for numerous cars every day to do a U- turn to get into Naples Manor right now. I never have thought the thing made any sense; I don't know who came up with that. But so, that's one concern. So, I wanna know what you're gonna do about access to 41 and what you're gonna do with Maple Lane. Because Maple Lane isn't designed for this. This is old houses. My house was built in ' 67. [00:40:001 And it's low. And a lot of these houses are low. And then, the road was built a long time ago too, and not made for today's modern codes. Another thing is, you see on my property, you see the red square outline, bottom left corner. So, the county, in all their wisdom, put a pump station in there after they closed the creek off that went through Treviso Bay out to the salt water because they were shutting all the freshwater runoff out. So, they put that pump station in. It's got a 19-inch pump, supposed to be pumping into this cypress head, just below my property, it's underneath. And then there's another pipe, 24-inch pipe that goes underneath, Page 26 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript what's that, Parsimony Port, underneath all those houses, into that cypress head. Which would be to the left, off of the page. Wayne: Right. Charlie: They haven't ran that one time. We get hurricanes, everything else. We're flooded out. [00:41:00] And the water, there's nowhere for it to go. That's why it's so backed up all these ditches, because they won't use that pump, they never have. It's never worked right. I think there's a problem with Treviso Bay probably complaining about it, too. Would be my theory. But on my property, when I built that building back there to the left of the A, I had to get an engineer. My water can't run off into that canal. Wayne: Yeah. Charlie: Like everybody else's. And there's no reason why that other 5 acres, when you put in these houses, should have that drainage access to these canals. The way they do it all over town now, everybody has to retain their own water. Wayne: That's not exactly how the water management design works. Almost every site has off -site discharge, it's at a very low, controlled rate. The county sets a discharge rate for every basin that they're in. Have you all talked to the county at all about your road situation where it stands? Charlie: Yeah. [00:42:00] Female Speaker: Yes. [Crosstalk] Wayne: I'm not trying to be argumentative with you at all, I'm just asking because they are a public works project and I think the county needs to be aware of your concerns because the county is the only people that can fix a county road or a county drainage system. [Crosstalk] Charlie: From my perspective, I've never gotten a formal answer from anybody who works with the county. Any time, in any of my Page 27 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript dealings. When I complained about them never running the pump station and there's nowhere for the water to go, the canal's at capacity. Then they tell me oh well, we had to do that for tree huggers, so that's where the water recycler starts. Wayne: Yeah. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Yes, sir? Gary: Gary Mahathat again. Your preliminary design. [00:43:00] I would expect any developer would do this; you're maximizing the site for the most amount of units that you can get in there, according to the requirements. Therefore, 16 sites. Isn't it also possible, because of water retention requirements, that when this goes before the city and the county, that they may say hey, you need more water retention than what you've shown, therefore you may have to reduce 16 sites down to 11 or 12, isn't that — Because this is all a preliminary. Wayne: It's all a preliminary design. Yes, sir. Gary: Right. So, the water retention again, would that be the upper righthand corner of that yellow area? Wayne: On this plan, on the upper lefthand corner that's labeled, Tract B. That was a preliminary design [inaudible] [00:43:511 retention system. Gary: Right, but on that other plan, I'm just trying to visualize it. It's the upper righthand corner or the right for the retention area? [Crosstalk] Wayne: Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Gary: Okay. [00:44:00] So, I don't know, I'm thinking for the people that live there. That's what you're concerned about the most is the water runoff and the water retention. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: Yeah, we flooded — yes. Gary: It's possible that they might have to reduce the number of sites, so we might be getting all excited too early. Page 28 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: Yeah, next year. Appreciate it. Anybody else who hasn't spoken? Yes, sir? Ryan: It's Ryan Young, live on Raintree Lane. Just have a couple of questions about the whole thing and thank you guys for being here again. So, first thing, I did a pretty decent examination of all the documents and everything. One of which was the traffic study. And I'm a scientist by training, so I look at data in a certain way and I was fairly surprised to see that the traffic was not studied on the streets that would be impacted by it the most. [00:44:581 Focusing on the traffic flow from the street to US-41 is equivalent to me catching fish in the Gulf of Mexico and trying to figure out the carrying capacity of that pond on this thing. Which doesn't really align, so I would request that the county get a more robust study that takes a little finer look at what we're dealing with here. So, my question No. 1 is, are you gonna look closer at the traffic that's gonna impact this community specifically, or are we basing this whole thing off of US-41? Wayne: Jim, answer what the TIS requirements are. Tell them what the county requires you to look at. Jim: Well, the traffic congestion requirements, we've met that. We've satisfied that. Based on some of your comments, I probably will do a little additional investigation. I'm not gonna tell you today at what depth we're gonna do because I can tell you, if we go out there and we collect traffic counts on those streets, Maple and Raintree. The volumes are gonna be very, very low. [00:46:00] There's just not a lot of traffic on those streets. So, we're gonna show, we go out and collect this data, we're gonna take it to the county commissioners at the hearing, the people that make the decision of whether to approve this. And they're gonna say, currently the traffic volume on these streets is this, which we all know they're gonna be low. And we're gonna add an additional 18 trips. It doesn't cause me, from a capacity standpoint, a concern that we are overloading the streets. Now, I understand about the streets that you say you have to drive around. I live on a street too where when garbage cans are out on the street, we have to stop and let their neighbors pass, as I explained, I live on a two-lane local road, with 60 homes on it. So, I know exactly what that's like. And so, I understand that. And so, yes. We will probably do additional information. But the traffic study that you reviewed does meet the county's standard of what we're required Page 29 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript to provide. Ryan: Thank you for that. And as scientist myself, I don't usually make assumptions about things. [00:47:01 ] I try to look at the data and let the data tell the story, so I hope we can do that here on these streets and maybe be surprised at what the problem with traffic is right now and what this could add to it. So, that was my first question. Another gentleman mentioned zoning. We're going to RS-4, is what we're trying to go for. I know the community is currently zoned RS-4 and I spoke with the county at length about that. And just looking at the lost in the RS-4 zone right now, they're more congruent with an RS-3. And I don't know if that's gonna impact it too much, but I think that might be something to look into, just because our frontage is 100 feet, there's three lots in the entire community that fall underneath that. And they're all under 10,000 square feet, which would make the minimum distance between your house, or those houses a little bit more, as an RS-3. [00:47:591 So, can the county consider rezoning to RSF-4, it might be more congruent with the community and the feel of it without changing the whole entire place and reducing values and things like that, to go RSF-3 instead. So, just something that I was thinking of, that I wanna mention on the record. Wayne: Okay. Point taken, okay. Ryan: Yep. And then, just another thing that I had here. We're talking about the drainage, and I know the study, the designs haven't been completed yet. But I know that according to the historical case, we're not allowed to increase the burden on cross -stream neighborhoods, with any of the right of ways or the surrogate tenants. So, that being said, those conveyance systems are already exceeding what they're supposed to do. [00:48:581 So, you guys might not have the answer to this but are they prepared to make off -site improvements, so that the current — I'm losing the word for it. The easements. The current easements are they gonna make off -site improvements to the easements upstream, so that they're not increasing the burden on those easements, such as the drainage system, the roads. The roads aren't wide enough to have this many cars. There's no sidewalks. There's a lot of people and kids that walk Page 30 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript around this community. So, are they planning to put in sidewalks, widen the roads a little bit, fix all the drainage. Maybe put sewers in. There's a lot of dollars that might go into that. But is that something that's on the plate because in order to build this here and not exceed the threshold, is that something that the company's prepared to do? Wayne: Well, I would say that is a lot. Normally off -site improvements are not necessarily required, especially for a project of this scale. [00:50:011 Treviso Bay for instance, is a large development and regional impact, it was required to do off -site impacts because they truly had off -site impacts. I don't think it's necessary for what we're proposing. I understand your comments. We can't exacerbate problems downstream with regard to drainage and things like that. I don't think we have the capability to go rebuild a county road. Ryan: Okay, just checking. Because I know that is a thing and I'm just trying to get a grasp on it. Wayne: Yeah, a common off -site impact that we're required to do would be a turn lane, for instance that Jim and the county designs. So, if you had intersection improvements that're required which are done in county right of way per say. But I don't see that happening here for the low volume of traffic that we're generally — Ryan: Swales, sewers? Wayne: Well, we'll start with water and sewer availability. So, we'll be connecting to water and sewer, is my understanding. Ryan: I'm talking more about the surface water drainage. Wayne: Oh, surface water drainage. Ryan: Yeah. Wayne: I mean, the project probably will have internal swell systems, etcetera to convey our own water. So, I don't think we're gonna go back and redo swells along Maple Lane or Raintree Lane or any of those. [00:51:021 Ryan: Okay. So, that's being said, that that isn't going to impact the [inaudible] [00:51:091 at all? It's not gonna increase the burden on Page 31 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript them? So, that's the current thought? Wayne: Right. Well, no. That's part of the requirement. Obviously, that's part of the county basis of reviewing the water management district. Ryan: Okay, that's still underway, right? Wayne: We haven't started that process yet. This is the very first stage of getting the property. We don't know if we can put 16 houses here, because the county hasn't told us we can. Ryan: Okay. Yeah. In reading the permit, I'm so sorry to interrupt, I saw that it was rejected under water management because of the Crutchfield Sebring Realty Co. case. And not putting increased pressure on the adjacent community. So, I know that's underway, I just wanted to put that here on the record in front of everybody. And the only other thing is, this was just in passing. Me and Troy were just talking about going into business and potentially putting a bunch of chicken coops and maybe raising some pigs on the adjacent 5-acre lot. [00:52:07] So, I don't know how that's gonna impact the project at all but it's 5 acres in agricultural so, it might be able to hold a lot of poultry. And we would be able to do pretty well with it so, I just wanna give you guys a heads up. Wayne: Thank you. Ryan: Thank you guys. Wayne: Yes, sir? David: Hi, my name is David Wallace and I'm new here, I've only been here 10 years. And I can see here, you've got a impact statement on cars, which I think is low. But I think that things that you miss are, we have a whole thing of carts down at Raintree. Basically, that road is blocked every single day, Monday through Friday, with large trucks coming in every day and offloading. [00:53:011 And leaving absolutely one really small way that you have to get around the truck. In order to get into this area and access Tammy Amity Court or Raintree or Maple or Cypress. That's an everyday thing. I don't think it's being counted. We've got no lights. The kids mostly play in yards, but they have bicycles. And how this is all gonna come in. How're you going to say it doesn't impact the Page 32 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript car thing, but the kids are there, no lights and really tight, tight spaces. Are you counting Amazon? They're there three, four times a day and it goes back and forth. And no, there are no roads that in the day, you don't get blocked off and have to go around and it's close, really close. And I think you have to take this into consideration as well as 18 cars, which is certainly low. [00:54:03] But okay, if you went with that really, you have to count the other things that do happen here on a daily basis. The car thing is every, single day and it's tractor trailers. Wayne: Thank you, sir. Yes, ma'am. Katy: Hi, My name's Katy Escobel. I have a couple of questions. You represent the property owner? Wayne: Yes, ma'am. Katy: What is the property owner's intent, with respect to his relationship with the surrounding neighborhood? Wayne: I'm not sure I understand your question. Katy: Does the property owner want to have an amiable relationship with the surrounding neighborhood, or does the property owner care? Wayne: Well, I'm sure he wants the people he sells the lot to, a home to, to certainly be a part of the community. Katy: So, can you help me understand why only some homes in the surrounding community received notice of this meeting. [00:55:02] And not all of the homes that would be impacted? Wayne: Yes. There's a 500-foot notice requirement from our property boundary and then we have to notify any established HOAs that the county has on record. Katy: So, but if you're saying that the property owner, I mean from what I hear you saying, the property owner wants to have a good relationship. Wouldn't you agree that by providing notice to the entire community, that would communicate that the property owner cares about what our opinions are, about the impact of his project on our neighborhood? Wayne: Ma'am, we provided the required legal notice with the county, we Page 33 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript do it for every project and I've done hundreds of these. Katy: That's not what I'm asking. Wayne: But the question is answered by, we provided a legal notice. Katy: So, you're saying he'll do the bare minimum, but nothing beyond? Wayne: Ma'am, it's a legal notice requirement. There's also a legal ad placed in the newspaper that anybody looks up legal ads can see. [00:56:00] Katy: And some of us work and have jobs, so we don't sit around reading legal notices. Don't you think it would be much easier and a sign of good will, if the property owner were to offer notice of, as this plan unfolds, to the entire neighborhood, to everyone. It's not gonna cost much money. It would certainly be a sign of good will. What's the hang up besides the fact that maybe, the owner doesn't want us to know what they're intending on doing. Wayne: Well, I'm glad you got the notice and that you're present. Katy: Well, that's because of the activism of this community. So, my other question is this, you have mentioned several studies. What exactly are the studies that've been completed so far? Wayne: Well, you've heard Mr. Banks describe his traffic analysis, that was one of the single requirements. Katy: Right. You've done traffic. Wayne: We've done an environmental assessment of the site, which looks at the bugs and bunny aspect. Katy: Sure. Wayne: And those are the two required studies that are required as part of this rezoning application. [00:57:00] Katy: And who pays for those studies? Wayne: The property developer pays for those. Katy: So, the studies are paid for by the person who has a vested interest Page 34 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript in having the studies done straight, that the project will not have a negative impact on the surrounding community? Wayne: The property owner pays for those studies; they're evaluated by Collier County to the standards that they have in the land development code. Katy: Wouldn't you agree though, that they're biased? Wayne: No ma'am, I don't. Jim Banks is a certified traffic engineer. He has to put his professional license on the line for every traffic study that he does. He's not gonna jeopardize his traffic analysis to say, this generates X number of trips compared to something else. The county's got its own person that reviews the traffic analysis. They look at the studies and they analyze his report. They may ask him for comments, they may ask him for changes. They may say Jim, you made a clerical error here, you need to fix it. Katy: Well, he hasn't studied those specifically, Raintree and Maple. I think you established earlier — Wayne: Ma'am, this has been answered several times. [Crosstalk] Katy: No, it actually hasn't. Wayne: Yes, it has. The traffic analysis was prepared to meet Collier County standards. [00:58:03] It does not require that we analyze every street [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:58:051. [Crosstalk] Katy: Forgive me for being dunce, I'm simply trying to understand what specific streets were analyzed in conducting that analysis. Forgive me for being a dumb blonde. Female Speaker: US-41. Wayne: US-41 was the street that was analyzed because that's where we intersect, and we'll put our traffic onto that minor [inaudible] road. Katy: So, you would agree with me that Raintree, Maple and Cypress were not studied? Page 35 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: They were not specifically analyzed as far as Jim Banks's traffic map. Jim: Yeah. Katy: So, I'm correct, that those three streets were not studied. The specific impact of this project on the traffic on those streets was not studied? Wayne: That's correct. Katy: Okay. All right. Female Speaker: What about the [inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Katy: Okay, so my other question is, there is a commercial, a hybrid commercial and residential development that's going up at the corner of Tammy Amity — excuse me, of Raintree and US-41. [00:59:02] Has there been any type of study, or will there be any type of study that discusses the impact of that, coupled with this project, on the traffic on Raintree, Maple and Cypress? Wayne: Their study, they would have had to prepare a traffic analysis as part of their project review and approval. I don't know anything about that project in terms of the details, but they would have to provide the same type of traffic analysis to the county that we have. Katy: No, my question is whether this project that we're all here on, has also considered that new hybrid commercial -residential property and the impacts of the traffic on all of our streets from both that project, as well as this proposed project. Jim: We considered the impacts of all pending developments, in and around the area. [01:00:001 Katy: On 41 ? Jim: As to the impacts onto US-41, that's correct. Katy: All right. So, on behalf of everyone here, I would like to ask you one question. Are you willing to give notice of future meetings, Page 36 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript future plans, to the entire community? Female Speaker: Of Myrtle Cove and that includes Cypress, Maple, Raintree and the fourth distance street that is [inaudible — crosstalk] [01:00:341 land from Myrtle. [Crosstalk] Katy: I know it's not legally required. But what I'm saying is, can this property owner, and you as his representative, do the right thing? Is this something you're willing to do, yes, or no? Wayne: The next opportunity for a meeting that we have is the Collier County Planning Commission. The county provides the notice for those meetings. Katy: How does the county provide notice? Wayne: The county sends out mail notices to everybody, I think Ray, correct me if I'm wrong, was it 500 feet? [01:01:011 Katy: Right, but you're not — Wayne: Ma'am, I'm not in control of noticing the county planning — Katy: No -no -no -no -no. I'm not asking you to be in control of noticing a county meeting. I am asking if you, as a representative of the property owner, are willing to give notice to this entire community because it's the right thing to do. Yes, or no? Wayne: No, because I have no idea what you're asking me to notice. I'm holding this public meeting in accordance with the county standards tonight. Do you want me to hold another meeting and notice more people, is that what you're asking? Katy: No, what I'm asking is, when this project goes to the county commission or goes to the county planning board, instead of giving notice to just the bare minimum of people within 500 feet, are you willing to give notice to everyone in our neighborhood? Wayne: That's a question you're gonna have to ask the county because I don't provide — Katy: I'm not asking — Page 37 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Sharon: The zoning sign will go up on the property. Katy: I'm asking you. Wayne: No ma'am, I won't be providing that notice for the planning commission hearing. [01:02:00] Katy: Okay. Laura: Laura John, on behalf of Collier County. The difference when it comes to the time of the planning commission, is that there is also a sign posted on the property. That is the method by which this 32 square foot sign lets those in the surrounding area know that a meeting is going to take place. [Inaudible — crosstalk] [01:02:241. [Crosstalk] Katy: But my point is that just because something is legal — Male Speaker: You're talking about the dead end, right? Wayne: Excuse me. Please. I'm gonna stop the meeting if we can't have some order, please. Katy: My point is, just because something is legal, doesn't mean it's a good idea. It's legal to smoke, it doesn't mean it's a good idea. Male Speaker: [Inaudible] [01:02:48] Im Ray Bellow the [inaudible] manager for the county. Katy: Hi, Brian. Speaker: [Inaudible]. Female Speaker: What was the name again? Ray: I do see a lot of concern — Ray Bellows. I'm the zoning manager for the county. Female Speaker: Thank you. Ray: And thank you for coming out because as a county official, I don't know what's going on in your individual community. Page 38 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript [01:03:031 So, we hold these meetings so I can find out. My team can find out. I have at least 15 people who will be working on this. Fire department folks. Storm water management, transportation, landscaping. Our team gets together, we review their information to make sure it's consistent with our codes. We want to hear from you. And we're hearing a lot of concerns. Some of them sound like they're pre-existing concerns about how the property was originally developed, water management, it wasn't the same as it is now. So, it's a change, we try to make things better. And the newer developments will be better, because there are codes requiring it. Traffic, if we have a real issue with that, we'll see what we can do, based on what our codes allow us to do that makes a condition of approval. [01:04:01 ] Sometimes, there are rules that can help us. Sometimes there's just not and we can't force them to do it. But I just wanna note, I'll give you my phone number and you can call us, and we can show you, our plans. And be more [inaudible]. Female speaker: Email and — okay. Ray: Yes. Female Speaker: How did [inaudible] [01:04:19]? Ray: No. Female Speaker: [Inaudible]. Ray: My email is Ray, R-A-Y, Bellows, B-E-L-L-O-W-S [inaudible] FL dot [inaudible]. Female Speaker: Could you repeat slower? Give me one minute. Okay, it's Ray, R- A-Y. Dot Bellows, B-E-L-L-O-W-S. At Collier County, FL dot gov. Katy: And last, my 8-year-old son would like to speak briefly. His name is John Escobel and he's 8 years old and he lived on Raintree Lane. [01:05:011 Wayne: Hi, John. Page 39 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript John: I just wanted to say that I know that there will be turns on this, so when you do those turns, the trucks that will be coming in and out of this. Won't they be damaging the property to other people that live on Maple Lane or Cypress or Raintree lane? Katy: I think he's talking about the construction vehicles that will be coming in and out to construct this wonderful project that you're proposing. Wayne: Yeah. So, every project obviously will have construction and the county requires to file a construction management type plan with them. So, they establish hours of operation for us, and we may have to do traffic control devices and things like that, but that's yet to be determined. It's obviously designed to be as least impactful to the community as it can be. [01:06:001 Katy: Given the current proposed site plan, how many trucks would be coming in and out of that site on a daily basis and what roads would be used for ingress and egress for the construction vehicles? Wayne: I don't have an estimate of what that might be, ma'am. Katy: What road could be used for ingress and egress for the construction vehicles? Wayne: Well, there are only two roads with access to US-41, that's gonna be either Cypress or Raintree. Katy: So, you would agree with me that the developer will be using both Raintree and Maple in order to access the property for the purposes of construction? Wayne: Absolutely. Katy: Folks, I think we all know what this is gonna happen. Our children are not gonna be able to use the roadways anymore. The neighborhood is gonna be fundamentally changed. We bought our property in order to get away from this type of thing, so that our child could ride his bike down the street and not get run over by a car or by construction vehicles. [01:06:59] And I hope that the German investor who has bought this property and only cares about the bottom line carefully considers, the impact that this is gonna have on the people here and the people Page 40 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript who are not here. Because there are just as many people here as who are not. So, double or triple that number and those are the number of people that're gonna be impacted. And when someone gets hit by a car, when there are personal injuries. When there is damage to property, when there's increased theft. That's on him. Wayne: Has anyone who has not spoken like to speak on something other than drainage or traffic, because I think I got that. Katy: Here you go. Would you like to go? Male Speaker: Yes. Part of what she was asking for was a little bit of transparency. And putting a 30-foot sign at the end of a road, at the beginning of the dirt road, which is certainly blocked off at Raintree. [Crosstalk] Katy: [Inaudible] [01:07:58] just us. [01:07:591 Male Speaker: If we supplied you with stamps, would you actually do something and put the letter in there? If you want, we can supply you with addresses. But that you can get from the county. Wayne: We have the addresses and again, the requirement that the county has is for the planning commission hearing. I don't advertise those meetings; the county advertises for those public hearings. I don't have control over them, sir. I'm sorry. Male Speaker: Okay. Wayne: Yes, ma'am. Tiara: Using this visual, just as a representation, I just wanna state that every person on here only has one rear neighbor. Correct? Wayne: I'm not sure what you're asking me. Tiara: For the whole, they have one rear neighbor and an adjacent neighbor. That's on either side of them, correct? Wayne: Yes, it appears so, sure. Tiara: So, on your plan, and I know I mentioned this. Page 41 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript [01:08:571 How can privacy be adequately provided with the plan that you guys are presenting? Because that is an invasion of privacy. Wayne: Well, the county has property requirements with a subdivision — Tiara: You stated that and then the county gentleman stated that there is going to be landscaping provided? What will that entail? Wayne: Hang on one second. I'm hearing a lot of background noise. Can we talk one at a time, sir? We're having trouble hearing, do you mind? Thank you. Tiara: Because currently, that property has borders of plants that surround the entire perimeter. If those are reduced and we are seeing neighbors on their porch, eight of them as a fact, on our side of the property, that is a very big concern as everybody here only has a certain amount. Wayne: Okay. We'll appreciate that and like I said, we do have buffer requirements — Tiara: I see landscaping though, you said that the county, that was a plan in action that had already been discovered or looked at? Wayne: No. No, they have not. Tiara: Well, Ray Bellows just said landscaping. Wayne: They have a landscape reviewer. [01:10:001 The landscape reviewer will make sure that whatever we do, they don't have a specific plan they're evaluating. They're looking at whether or not our RSF-4 Zoning should go next to RSF-4 Zoning on this piece of property. They will condition that we have to meet all the minimum standards for the land development [inaudible — crosstalk] [01:10:141. [Crosstalk] Tiara: And for the gentleman with the investment property of these homes, what solution or buffer for sound, for visuals, what is that going to entail? Wayne: And I don't know the answer for you tonight. But I'm glad you're here to share with me that's your concern because I can go back and talk to the owner and try to [inaudible — crosstalk]. Page 42 of 55 [Crosstalk] Tiara: Wayne: Ryan: Wayne: Ryan: [01:11:001 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Privacy is a very big issue when I'm expected to have eight new ones peering over into a yard that has two children in it. I understand. Thank you. So, we're gonna try to wrap up. So, if you have a couple more questions. Sure, thanks for letting me up again. Sure. One question. So, I've just learned that there is a construction road that's gonna come from Raintree into Cypress, is that correct? Wayne: No, sir. I didn't say that. Raintree and Cypress are the only two streets that access US-41, which means those two streets would be utilized for construction vehicles to get to the site. Ryan: So, oh. You mean coming off — Wayne: At US-41. Yes, sir. Ryan: And then turning on Tammy Amity Court and then down Maple? Wayne: Yes, sir. Ryan: Oh, okay. So, that answers that question for me. Other question, I did review the environmental assessment. I'm in that field, so I know that they can be quick and dirty. So, that's the required thing, I know that. But I have seen it documented, kestrel go over towards, black bear, bald eagle [inaudible] [01:11:401 and possibly [inaudible]. Right adjacent to that site, there's a lot of bald eagles around. I did search for a nest recently, there's one in the Treviso Bay PUD [inaudible] that you probably already know about. Wayne: Correct. Ryan: But definitely, all those other things have been frequenting the neighborhood. [01:12:001 We, okay? Wayne: [Inaudible] the lights, but we're gonna get those readjusted. Page 43 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Ryan: Okay. So, just noting the presence of all those animals. And I've identified them myself all along, right to the back of the property. Kestrel is very common, actually. And bald eagle and all that stuff. And so, it might be valuable for the county to request another environmental assessment or another third party one, just to make sure, especially with all the black bear sighting and reports from inside the neighborhood. Just because while it's not good quality habitat, it's still frequented as an area and that's a concern for me, especially because me Troy are gonna have a gigantic chicken operation. Wayne: Good luck. Ryan: Thank you. Wayne: Thank you. Yes, sir. Bill: Bill Bennet, from Raintree Lane. Two questions. Sharon: Can you speak up, please? Wayne: Can you speak up just a little? Bill: Yeah, most of my questions have been answered. [01:13:001 But how about sewer? On the end of Maple Lane, actually the beginning of Maple Lane and Tammy Amity Court, I believe there's a lift station. We had a bad storm that requires trucks to be brought in to pull the sewage out. What type of studies have been done for the sewage? Wayne: Not much. The county has shared with us the GIS network showing us the size of the utility lines they're allowing us to add to. But we haven't done — Bill: Could you get an engineering firm out to do a study to make sure that it's not gonna create a problem for us? Wayne: We will at later stage, as part of the subdivisional design and the engineering design. This is very, we're changing from agriculture to RSF-4, that's in the county's mind of what we're doing. Bill: Okay, thank you. Back to the road study, does the county require one of many road studies or just one study that you individually pick? Page 44 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: The county requires us to do a traffic impact statement per their guidelines, for the zoning application. We're required to do another one as part of the subdivision design. [01:13:59] Bill: Is this your option of how you do that study or does the county? Wayne: No, the county has a guideline that we're required to adhere to. Bill: Okay. I think everyone else got the questions. Wayne: Okay, thanks. Yes, sir? John: Hi, I'm John Escobel and I have one question, so I understand clearly. Can you let me know where the traffic is gonna be going if you start this construction? Is it Raintree and both those streets? Wayne: So on the aerial photograph, Raintree and Cypress are the only two streets that access US-41, where obviously the construction vehicles would be coming from. John: So, you're saying you're coming in and out of Raintree and Maple? Wayne: Raintree, Maple or Cypress to Maple. I don't think we know yet. Jim, do you have any idea? Jim: Do you have a red yeah, pointer? [Crosstalk] Wayne: Pointer? Male Speaker: I think the question is, how much Raintree — [01:15:011 Female Speaker: Yeah. Female Speaker: Where's the bridge the vehicles can — Jim: So, hang on, I'll answer the question you asked. It's gonna be a common point of ingress and egress. Construction traffic. Page 45 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: It's right here. Jim: Oh, okay. It will either enter in off of Raintree, come down Tammy Amity Court, down Maple Lane. Or if they're coming down from the south or traveling to the south, it would just be the reverse of that. So, these will be the two — John: Can you hear him? Jim: Two common routes that'll be used by the construction traffic. John: One more time, I'm sorry. Jim: So, if they're coming to and from the north, they would most likely use the Raintree entrance, turn left on Tamiami Court or turn back right out to head back out. And then that way [inaudible] [01:15:511. Or if they're heading to or from the south, they would use Cypress Lane, turn on Tamiami Court and then make a lane. [01:16:011 There is no reason why construction traffic would use this section of Raintree lane as a connect to the property. Nor would they use this segment of Cypress lane, because it does not connect to the property. Katy: [Inaudible] Raintree absolutely connects to the property. Jim: There is no access from the end of Raintree to this property. There will not be access to that property. It will be on the orient. Wayne: Yes, sir? Any other questions? John: That's all I wanted to ask. Wayne: Thank you. Yes, sir? Casey: My name is Casey Winter. I have a question about the process of building. Do you know approximately how long it would take to build to 10 to 16 homes that may eventually go here? Wayne: Well, I don't know exactly but typically, what you would do on a subdivision of that size, you come in and develop your site work and prep all the lots and the individual homes would be constructed as the lot would be required. [01:16:591 So, that process of the construction phase is probably six months once they start, to do the lot prep I would think. And then after that it's individual home construction. Page 46 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Casey: It could go on for 10 years? Wayne: Could be. Jim: But there could be down period in that, too. They might build a home, there might not be activity for six months. Casey: Okay. Thank you very much. Wayne: Thank you. Yes, sir? Rick: Hi, Rick Bodine. I live on Raintree Lane. Been there for 30 years. My main concerns and information I wanna give to our neighbors is that this is one of the oldest PUDs on east trail, Myrtle Cove. So, I'm curious as to what amendments have been made to that before this rezone request, because I believe that's the procedure. You would have to get a PUD amendment before you can change zoning within the PUD. And then the other factors which we've talked about, the drainage. What, this is gonna be considered a new development, so you're gonna have to have compensating storage on that parcel. [01:18:021 And from what I'm seeing on your coverage, you'll probably be required to have at least 30% open space. But based on the houses and the roadway you have; you have no room for any compensated storage on the lot. So, where would that be coming from? It has to be coming from the same basin. So, I'm just wondering how they're gonna take care of that. Wayne: Yeah, and again, we have not gotten into the detailed engineering design, that's a conceptual drawing. And to answer your first point, your property is not part of the PUD. You're in conventional RSF- 4 Zoning, or if you're farther south, it's RSF-6 Zoning, you're part of a subdivision that was platted and the lots were created and sold. Rick: Right. Wayne: You're not parcel planning and development. Treviso Bay for instance, to your west is part of the planning. Rick: Right. Well, basically before PUDs is when it was developed. So literally, all we're missing in our subdivision is a homeowner's association. [01:19:OO1 Where once you have one of those, then you might as well be a Page 47 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript PUD. Wayne: And you all can form one. Any subdivision can certainly do that. Rick: Right. Sure, sure. That's the main information thing that you can have more notifications, more communications with the county if we go that route. Katy: Probably the bare minimum. Rick: And well, that's what I mean, we would have more input. But I think that's the main thing. The way it's written in the parcel right now, the way they're developing the 16 lots, they can't compensate the flood plane storage for that 5 acres with their plans. So, I don't see how it's gonna pass. Thanks. Wayne: Sure, thank you. Yes, sir? Dean: Yeah, my name's Dean Brunner. On the south side of Cypress, on those lots, there's a canal that runs out of Maples Manor and that water goes through and hooks up to that canal. [01:20:03] That runs north and south to the west of Myrtle Cove. Okay, now you got that water coming in from Maple and then you talk about you're gonna hold the 11 inches of water? Well, if you get 11 inches of water on that property, you're getting 11 inches of water everywhere. So, from that point, that canal that's adjacent to your proposed property, where does that water run out? Wayne: I'm not sure exactly. Probably, it's discharging nowhere today. It's probably not discharging anywhere because there's no water management system on the site today. Male Speaker: That's because it's percolated. Dean: The point is, it's not going somewhere, it's gonna back up. Wayne: Oh, we're required to discharge it from the site. We have not designed the water management system, I thought I made that clear. Dean: But you're adding to the water, the problem? Wayne: Well, part of the reason the county created it's Lely area stormwater project was to help flows from not just this area, but elsewhere to the east and that project, the pump station that was referenced is part of that project. Page 48 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript [01:21:031 If it's not operating properly or the county's not operating it properly, I certainly encourage you to tell the county that you think they've got an operational problem. Female Speaker: We have. Dean: Now, as far the — [Crosstalk] Katy: Your [inaudible — crosstalk] [01:21:18] you should tell the same thing. Dean: County said they'll put a sign on the property. Why can't they just put a sign off of 41 so people in that neighborhood can see it [inaudible] . Wayne: Laura's here, she's listening. I don't know if the county can go post signage that's not according to the land development code. But they're here taking notes. So, it's duly noted. I don't think they can commit to you tonight to do that. Dean: Well, I know in other properties I own, I've seen county signs 400 and 500 feet away from where they're working. [01:21:59] And you can notify them. Some of us don't get the newspaper anymore. So, it would be nice if they put the sign out where people could see it. Another thing is, now your traffic control stuff, that's fine. But have you tried getting on 41 and going south off of Raintree or Cypress during the season? Jiro: You mean turning out right onto US-41? Dean: No, to go west on 41 or go northwest. Yes. Jim: Yeah, you have the option of either turning left out at — Dean: [Inaudible]. Jim: Oh, sorry. Jim Banks again. So, you have the option of turning left out — Dean: I know how to get out [inaudible]. But I'm just saying, it's hard to do because there's no light there. There isn't any proposal [inaudible] for a light on Raintree or maybe on Cypress? Page 49 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Jim: There's no proposal for it. Dean: Okay, I didn't think there was. The thing is, if you wanna go northwest off of Raintree, you gotta make a right and make a U- turn off of 41. [01:23:011 That place where you make the U-turn is the same spot where you exit off of Cypress. So, you've got diverging traffic there. You can sit at Cypress for quite a while if you wanna go into Naples. Jim: Right, or you can turn right on Cypress and go down and make a U-turn. Dean: At the light. Yeah, yeah. Jim: My street dumps out on 951 and that's what I have to do. My parents come to visit me, I tell them, don't try to turn left out, you go down to make a right turn and you make the U-turn at the signal. It's the safest move. Dean: [Inaudible] [01:23:35] property. What size properties are they? Jim: I'm sorry? Wayne: He lives in Golden Gate Estates. Dean: Golden Gate, your properties are 2 '/2 acres, right? Wayne: Not all of it. Jim: Yeah. Dean: So, it's a lot less condensed than we're talking about. All right. Wayne: Okay. Thank you. Yes, sir. We're gonna try to wrap this up so we can be out of here by 7:00, okay? Heather: My name is Heather Leudke, for the record. I'm gonna try to keep this short and sweet, maybe about four questions. I'm not sure if the first one would pertain to traffic or not. [01:24:051 But I'm not talking about vehicles, the only thing I have a quick question about is, within your research, is that only vehicles that you count or is it pedestrians and golf carts and something like that? Or is it just simply vehicles that you're counting on? Page 50 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript Wayne: It's vehicles that're counted. Heather: Just vehicles, okay. All right, I'm not sure if this would be for county, traffic or maybe even public safety but, I also have two children in the neighborhood and right there at the beginning of Maple Lane is where they pick up all of our elementary children. Female Speaker: Bus stop. Heather: And right now, if it rains, they have to stand in the water before they even get on the bus. And so, if that's supposed to be the main in and out, or so you stated, for construction and traffic, how do we protect our children when we're waiting for the bus? Female Speaker: Exactly. Wayne: Jim, you wanna answer that? I mean, we've gone over this a lot. Jim: Well, I mean, I acknowledge your comment. [01:25:001 And I'm not trying to say this to be inflammatory but, you're talking about conditions in numerous residential neighborhoods. It's the same situation on my street. Heather: Well, we manage just fine now, but will this [inaudible — crosstalk] [01:25:141. [Crosstalk] Jim: I know, but your implication is, is that somehow the people that live in these homes aren't gonna drive careful like the rest of you all do and it's threatening your children because — Heather: Well, [inaudible] families is totally different. [Inaudible] I'm not sure. The next question I have would be, maybe this is for the county. As a neighborhood, is there any possible way that we have a chance of even stopping this zoning, or are we all just here wasting our time? Female Speaker: Yep [inaudible] [01:25:571. [01:26:00] Wayne: [Inaudible] like Laura said earlier, staff reviews the — Heather: I asked the county, I'm sorry. Wayne: Ma'am, this is my meeting. The county is here as a courtesy Page 51 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript [inaudible — crosstalk] this is our informational meeting. [Crosstalk] Heather: Well, we're here. Oh, I thought [inaudible]. Wayne: No, no. We take input. [Inaudible — crosstalk] ma'am. Ma'am. Sir. Ma'am. [Crosstalk] Heather: [Inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Katy: [Inaudible — crosstalk] hearing. Male Speaker: You are required by law to hold this meeting. Wayne: And we are holding the meeting, sir. And I'd appreciate no interruptions from the audience [inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Male Speaker: [Inaudible — crosstalk]. Ray: For the record, Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager. What can I answer? Heather: The question was, as a neighborhood or the communities, and even though one street wasn't actually here, we're Myrtle Cove neighbors. As a subdivision or community, is there anything we can do, legally or whatever to stop the rezoning? Ray: Well, the county has created a process and part of the process includes what we call this neighborhood information meeting. [01:27:04] We also have a land development code that has rules and regulations and every project that comes in for a rezone has to comply with those rules and regulations or we will reject it and say, you don't comply. Now, they may agree to disagree with staff, and we take it to the planning commission. Our interpretation of this particular code or provision says X, Y and Z and they say, this is why we think it should be something else. The planning commission is an advisory board that will make the recommendation to the board of county commissioners and then Page 52 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript both will decide who's right, staff or the applicant. So, there are projects that are denied at the board or the county commission level. Usually, there's a lot of opposition that help drive their opinion, but they aren't governing the way staff is. We look at the code exactly as it is written and make sure that they meet the code. The planning commission is an advisory board. They listen to a wider range of things. [01:28:001 Compatibility is one of the things that can drive a decision to not support a rezone application. The planning commission will make a recommendation. That will be put in a report, given to the board of county commissioner. And please, attend the planning commission and board because [inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: We will [inaudible — crosstalk]. Ray: And it's been a great hearing from you, because now I understand the concerns of the community more and when Laura and I get together we'll talk. We'll bring our team together and we'll make a plan, how we think the project complies or doesn't comply. How compatible is it or isn't it. And we'll try to address all your concerns and please, give us a call, give me a call. We can go into more detail but sometimes it's so hard in this time. Female Speaker: Email is probably better. Ray: Yeah, emails. I get tons of calls and emails. A lot of things happening in the county. Female Speaker: Yeah. Ray: But we're here to help. Really, we are. And petitions do get denied. [01:29:001 Most of them get approved, quite frankly because at some point, the process is designed to make their process comply with our rules and regulations. Female Speaker: Correct. Thank you, sir. Female Speaker: Thank you, Ray. Heather: Thank you. Leandra: Leandra Wilson again. One more question, I have one picture I Page 53 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript have, the street. So, the results from this meeting are typed out on a transcript, do I understand this correctly? Wayne: Correct. Leandra: And sent to the planning board. Wayne: Yes, ma'am. Leandra: And they read through the script, all of our concerns, all of the details and things we've talked about. And they'll take that into consideration before holding the next meeting in regards to this project? Wayne: The planning commission will be the next meeting with regard to the project. Leandra: Okay. Wayne: And they will be provided a transcript of the meeting. Leandra: Okay. Wayne: It'll be an audio recording that's also submitted to them and some people wanna listen to it and they'll listen instead. [01:30:00] Leandra: Okay, good. Wayne: Reading the transcript, but then the transcript will be provided and the backup material for the application. Leandra: Okay. That's what I wanted to know, what the next step was. Thank you. Wayne: Thank you. Yes, sir? Bill: Bill Bennet, one last question. Back to road density, does the county require you to determine how many accidents might happen in a period of time if they give you a location, of the study? Jim: We can only base accidents based on historical crash data. I can't forecast future crashes. I do not know what that — Bill: The reason I ask that is, I'm sure all of us have been in a situation Page 54 of 55 PL20210002449, 5175 Maple Lane Rezone February 23, 2022 NIM Transcript where we're sitting at a stop sign and as people stack up behind us, we tend to make the risks. We get nervous and we pull out. [Crosstalk] Jim: The county has crash record at those intersections, I can tell you that. Historical crash records. Wayne: Thank you. Well, I think everybody for coming out. We're gonna go ahead and close the meeting tonight and appreciate your input. You've got our contact information. [01:31:01] We have Ray Bellows' contact information. Feel free to ask us, we'll give you the presentation [inaudible — crosstalk]. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: [Inaudible — crosstalk] additional contact information — [End of Audio] Duration: 91 minutes Page 55 of 55 PETITION. PL20210002449 - 5175 MAPLE LANE REZONE February 23, 2022 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found on our website: MA", SCAN �7 .'ME • www.gradyminor.com/Planning GradyMinor INTRODUCTION PROJECT TEAM: • Wolfgang Gilles - Applicant • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Michael Delate, P.E., Civil Engineer - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer - JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist - Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. *Please note, all information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. 2 0 offiffo "I, w4i i #~ tAN 4t k � PROJECT INFORMATION Site Location: 5175 Maple Lane Site Acreage: 5.3+/- Acres Future Land Use (FLU) Designation: Urban Mixed Use Residential District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict Current Zoning: A, Agricultural Proposed Zoning: RSF-4, Residential Single -Family District Existing Use: Landscape Nursery Proposed Use: Single Family Residential 0 PROPOSED REQUEST This application proposes to rezone the 5.3+/- acre parcel Agricultural Zoning District to the RSF-4 Zoning District to maximum of 16 single family residential dwelling units. from the allow a 5 LOT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Minimum Lot Area: 7,500 square feet Minimum Lot Width: Corner Lot - 75 feet, Interior Lot - 70 feet Maximum Building Height: 35 feet Minimum Floor Area: 1-story - 800 feet, 2 story - 1,200 feet Minimum Setbacks: Front Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: 25 feet 7.5 feet 25 feet 0 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN .ly 1 k ET UEl C:E 4 Y f I I I I , I ; — — — — — — — — — — I I I I " I I I I TIi,4CT 'B' I I I I 5' —4 � T PROPERTY LINE , r DE I I I l 1 1 11 III I l 7 � I r f i i i e l i t I I I 1 I I I .I —--- 11 + " TRACT'A' PROPERTY I + I � I I I I Lr I J I + 3 MIN. LOT SIZE WBY15' 3 -- YRACT'R'----- - -- - -�� s I fI I I I f 10 I f I L I J I L t 11 t t 12 t j 13 I T 5' .5'T-5' 7.5' I I II 21 ---ii J L —J _ I s I I ADJACENT ZONING 91 CONCLUSION Documents and information can be found online: Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found on our website: www.gradyminor.com/Planning • Gradyminor.com/Planning • Collier County GMD Public Portal: cvportal.colliercountyfl.aov/CityViewWeb Next Steps • Hearing sign(s) posted on property advertising Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioner (BCC) hearing dates. • CCPC - TBD • BCC - TBD Contact: • Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or 239.947.1 144 extension 1249 • Collier County Staff: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner; Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov or (239) 252-4312 0 5175 MAPLE LANE LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Collier County, Florida DECEMBER 2021 Prepared By: Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 68t' Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 (239) 263 - 2687 marcoe@prodigy.net I Introduction / Purpose This report is an account of a Listed Species Survey recently performed on a 5.3 acre tract called Maple Lane. Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report of any potential listed species utilizing the site that may be at risk due to possible future development actions. This survey and report are based on fieldwork performed during November- December 2021. II Site Description Maple Lane consists of approximately 5.3 acres and is located in Section 30, Township 50, Range 26; Collier County, Florida. This parcel is approximately 2 miles south of the intersection of US 41 (Tamiami Trail) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road on the west side of US 41. This parcel is located almost to the end of Maple Lane. The site is bordered by a canal and single family homes. There is a canal along the northern and southern boundaries. To the east and west are single family homes. This parcel was a commercial landscaping operation. The site has remnant buildings and planted trees. See Exhibit # 1 - Location. Map This site is cleared of any native habitat. There are some mature trees on site. There are planted live oaks in rows and some scattered throughout. The site has a few Slash pines and some cypress along the northern property line. There are some large Banyan, Java plum trees ad a variety of palms. The availability of good functional habitat has been greatly reduced. The following habitats are found onsite. See Exhibit 42 - FLUCCS Map CODE HABITAT 240 / 740 Nursey/Disturbed TOTAL SITE = 5.3 ac. III Listed Species Surve ACREAGE 5.3 acres Upland The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in November - December 2021. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. These transects were ground - located and walked by compass bearing. Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 -1800) time periods were chosen to survey these transects. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. IV Results & Discussions November 24,30 December 1, 2021 Nice clear sky, low 80's Listed Flora Several Tillandsia s . were seen on site on planted live oaks Refer to Exhibit # 3 - Cumulative Plant List Listed Fauna A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit # 4 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion: Taking into account the location of the parcel, any State and Federal listed species that could be found on or around the site include: Gopher Tortoise This site does not offer some suitable habitat for Gopher tortoise. Specific attention was given looking along the face of any spoil material mounds. However, no signs or burrows were identified on the subject parcel. Big Cypress Fox Squirrels The area is known as potential fox squirrel habitat. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed foraging and/or inhabit ting the subject parcel. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida. Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. The proposed project is not anticipated to adversely affect the Florida Bonneted Bat. This site has no viable roosting habitat on site. Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. Conclusions Transects were walked on straight compass bearings along a grid spaced at approximately 20 yards apart for the entire parcel. Other transects were primarily meandering transects through areas of prime habitat. All transects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours. The project site does not have any native habitats. The site does have a few trees and palms scattered throughout. The majority of the site was cleared and utilized commercially as a landscaping company. There are some native trees. There are a few scattered Slash pines and some cypress located along the northern boundary. Most of the site is cleared and was utilized to grow landscaping plants and equipment. Some remnants of these planted trees primarily oaks still exist. Some of the planted oaks have some epiphytic vegetation such as Spanish moss and Tillandsia spp. on them. Since this site has no native habitat the utilization by wildlife is limited. Wildlife was limited to a few birds traversing the site. During this survey No Listed Species were observed. Threatened, Endanijered and Species of Special Concern Species Present Absent Suspected Black bear x Florida panther x Everglades mink x Big Cypress Fox squirrel x Bonneted Bat x Indigo snake x American alligator x Gopher tortoise x Gopher Frog x Southeastern American kestrel x Red -Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay x Wood stork x Snail kite x Bald eagle x Limpkin x Osprey x White ibis x Tricolored heron x Snowy egret x Reddish egret x Little blue heron x Threatened, Endangered and Species of Special Concern Species Present Absent Suspected Black bear x Florida panther x Everglades mink x Big Cypress Fox squirrel x Bonneted Bat x Indigo snake x American alligator x Gopher tortoise x Gopher Frog x Southeastern American kestrel x Red -Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay x Wood stork x Snail kite x Bald eagle x Limpkin x Osprey x White ibis x Tricolored heron x Snowy egret x Reddish egret x Little blue heron x El��AGNOUAAVECOPE LSLNSET 8 r WiLMAR Lli _ I}1TES OR' c- AF80 SU CREVYS Kd z m C c WHITAKER i q C" SR1t g nsPIULLYsAV., da ga.d� ern' ANY C? . 0 N Ot,. N.. U ol ta q} ROSE AVE �, m RAT•TI.ESNAKE HAMR�IOCK 4 w 3 y Q a7_ CL zn,q o , cl y6 _ fl ..D " p4-�G- Efi4iLlA CT �4 � �p'�. -.kY� . � AW Y R6 , . SEQUTA{WAY CSS1CSgR CAY CT t.', ♦ . mQ p�'� _ R.�QY - , HAWTHOANE TER U �'t O v�i; 0y�. �.- SNEAi3'CT AWAY. _ '^MYFTLELN �'P :.txSt-IENEiVDOAS-ICIft p�.Ep,KhS�s . A+� t;ILY CT ST nA r 'CAP«Titp - � N pST T ,�S r A SST FULLERiN $F4 B �--- cy [y f loop go y4r Doi y�r FLUCCS MAP Labels Drawing �+ Points Drawing v Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing ` Selected Custom Parcels Streets MapWise County Boundaries r Parcel Outlines 0 62 124 186 tt Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS Cade - Description Common Name, Scientific Name Indicator status 240 / 740 DISTURBED Upland This site has been cleared and was utilized as a landscaping company. There is a large warehouse, mobile home, and a home. The site also has some planted landscaping plants. There are some planted live oak trees. In addition, there are a few Slash pines and some cypress located along the northern property line. There is also a variety of large exotics such as Java Plum and Banyan trees. The site also has a variety of palms. There is no native habitat onsite. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Banyan Ficus benghalensis Exotic Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic java plum Syzygium cumini Exotic Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic areca palm Dypsis lutescens Exotic queen palm, Syagrus romanzoffiana Exotic Strangler fig Ficus aurea FAC Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Mexican clover Richardia grandiflora Exotic Air potato Dioscorea bulbifera Exotic Bahia grass Paspalum notatum UPL Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- Flat sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW Castor bean Ricinus communis FAC VINES grape vine Vitus spp. Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia Greenbrier Smilax spp. Epiphytic Plants On Planted Landscape Live oak trees Stiff - leaved Tillandsia fasiculata FDA/C Recurved T. balbisiana FDA/T Spanish moss T. usneoides NEIGHBORIG PROPERTIES 111- Single Family Home 510- Canal INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAQ, Upland (UPL) WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Amphibian & Reptiles: Brown anole Birds: Dove- mourning Mockingbird Red belly woodpecker Crow, American Bluej ay Cardinal Vultue, Black Mammals: S- pecies Anolis sagrei Zenaida macroura Mimus pol lye ottos Melanerpes carolinus Coryus brachyrhynchos Cyanocitta cristata Richmondena cardinalis Coraaps atratus Raccoon Procyon lotor Status Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 321 ] 681h Street SW, Naples, Florida 34105 PROJECT 2157 MAPLE LANE DESCRIPTION Telephone (239) 263-2687 marcoe@prodigy.net 5175 Maple Lane consists of approximately 5.3 acres and is located in Section 30, Township 50, Range 26; Collier County, Florida. This parcel is approximately 2 miles south of the intersection of US 41 (Tamiami Trail) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road on the west side of US 41. This parcel is located almost to the end of Maple Lane. The site is bordered by a canal and single family homes. There is a drainage canal along the northern and southern boundaries. To the east and west are single family homes_ This parcel was a commercial landscaping operation. The site has remnant buildings and some planted trees. This site has been cleared and was utilized as a landscaping company. There is a large warehouse, mobile home, and a home on site. Permits were obtained for a residence in 1962. Additional permits were obtained in 1976 (76-2044) and again in 1980 (80-4133). The site is entirely impacted. The site has no native habitat on site. The site does have some planted landscaping plants. There are some planted live oak trees in rows. There are a few Slash pines and some cypress located along the northern property line. There is also a variety of large exotics such as Brazilian pepper, Java Plum and Banyan trees. The site also has a variety of palms. There is no native habitat onsite. LOCATION MAPS z MAGNOLIA°AVE i SUNSET 8 --. COPE LN SUN r. WILMAR LN mt 3*-.- - z ARBOR LAYOF KE91G; �` '-----�". - n.Sj§ '. !!Bt a 5.10 a ` ' ' CLUB ESTATES QR'' I jq y4 c"�^'" GREWS ROT A �C Z TAKER RIP Q ;4 a: RIPx� YC 8 PO' LY,AVE y >'.,,SO - to GT k� a 'CoJo-r: �z x' ' SF1+W t: - iNOHAWKP4m. pF'1' m a R05E AVE , = ma RATTLESNAKEE HAMMOCK �=g�� 6p ._ � Ojt an z as paE_m w a4s'�v 96p F xr a afl11 a y „ �a � AMITY RU - nx �'" I�EtiUTA WAY ' c? CAYCT a a u - yP Cigss - OR 1,0 <2 1 0-1 FS - -)L +Y fl 55 4Y vWAWTHORNETERF rG- .pipPLELIJ. v s, SHeNE1�IROAH CIR ",w F.•,lu J ,ovq•©� gQ cnp%S-V n sT e �°Z. m=Il n 'ems, IJ S . - r...M °'1• FULLER LN h It PRICE5T f9 i Q�f R ,�` "^ Off' Off .. •N -.S � ,. �� $,. DOW ' SEQUTA WAY r !� gyp .r D rt-- p. { N f01 1. � Rr t Lti RAINTREE LN AVELLI�4. C1q _ r- '�•..-[AAPLE.LN rS' -{`ct• ..Q �, _ - - ... -. � ,gyp,. �, .. s' . �CYPRESSLN f L s 3 a sr I a 4 q ,.45 'e„�.. CI i 'P ST'2 tF!! Z! ;p �lelgmsr � G' LOCATION Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected custom Parcels Streets MapWise y��" County Boundaries f'V Parcel Outlines ot f RAtwjl 0 62 124 186 rt Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. Ali rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 5175 Site Zone Parcel No 00439520009 Address MAPLE LN Site City NAPLES *Note 34113 *Disclaimer Name / Address GILLES, WOLFGANG % GERMAN SERVICES 3960 RADIO ROAD UNIT 208 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34104 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B30 000100 003 5B30 30 50 26 5.32 30 50 26 FROM NW COR OF S1/2 SEC RUN E ALG N LI OF 51/2 4505.99FT TO Legal POB, CONT E 357.93FT TO NE COR OF S1/2 OF SEC ALSO NW COR OF MYRTLE COVE ACRES, UNIT 1 S ALG W LI MYRTLE COVE UNIT 1 677.05FT, W 329.47FT, N .673.75 FT TO POB Millage Area 0 7 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code. 69 - ORNAMENTALS, MISC AGRICULTURAL 4.889 6.5293 11.4183 Latest Sales History 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 585,200 08/25/21 6006-3092 $ 675,000 {+) Improved Value $ 99,692 04/09/21 5957-219 $ 0 {-) Market Value $ 684,892 10/31/19 5698-3756 $ 0 {-) 10% Ca 07/05/06 4066-568 $ 0 P $ 239,292 09/11/02 3107-1950 $ 335,000 t-) Agriculture $ 80,782 06/10/02 3052-2323 $ 0 {_} Assessed Value $ 364,818 06/20/94 1959-1196 $ 0 {_} School Taxable Value $ 604,110 03/01/73 515-855 $ 0 (_) Taxable Value $ 364,818 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Site Parcel No 00439520009 Address ' S 175 MAPLE LN Site Zone Site City. NAPLES *Note 34113 *Disclaimer Name / Address GILLES, WOLFGANG % GERMAN SERVICES 3960 RADIO ROAD UNIT 208 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34104 Permits (Provided for reference purposes only. *Full Disclaimer. ) Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 0 COUNTY PRBD20170519793 06/14/17 ROOF 1977 COUNTY 76-2044 12/30/77 1981 COUNTY 80-4133 09/17/80 Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code Units # Year Description Area Adj 10 ACREAGE 1 Built Area 20 ACREAGE 3.57 10 1962 RESIDENTIAL 1186 1596 30 0.75 20 1977 ALUM CARPORT 312 312 30 1981 METAL -WOOD 2880 2880 FRAME Owner and Property Description GILLFS, WOLFGANG Owner Name: % GERMAN SERVICES 3960 RADIO ROAD UNIT 208 Mailing Address: NAPLFS FL 34104 USA Site Address: 5175 MAPLE LN NAPLES FL 34113 Subdivision: ACREAGE HEADER County: COLLIER Land Use Code: 69 Land Use Desc: Ornamentals, misc agricultural Land Use FDOR 69 Code: Land Use FDOR Ornamentals, misc agricultural Desc: Zoning: Acres. 5.16 PIN: 00439520009 PIN2: 439520009 ALTKEY: 000100 003 51330 Last Data Update: 11/12/2021 Legal Description (not official) Parcel Map 30 50 26 FROM NW COR OF S112 SEC RUN E ALG N Li OF S112 4505.99FT TO POB, CONT E 357.93FT TO NE COR OF S112 OF SEC ALSO NW COR OF MYRTLE Building Summary 2021 Certified Values Actual Year Built: 1962 Land: $585,200 Effect. Year Built: Land Agricultural: $320,074 Living SgFt: 4066 Building: $0 Total SgFt: Misc: $0 Adjusted SgFt: 4476 Just Value: $684,892 Beds: Assessed Value: $364,818 Baths: Stories: 1 Num. of Buildings: Recent Sales Sale Date Book/Page Docnum Price Instrument Qualified Vac. or Grantor Impr. 2021-08-25 6006/3092 $675,000 2021-04-09 5957/219 $0 2019-10-31 5698 13756 $0 2006-07-05 4066/568 $0 2002-09-11 3107 1 1950 $335,000 Sunbiz Corporate Data Title Name Addressl city State Zip Code Map Layer Stats Soils Component MUIO Map Unit Name Component Hydric Hydric Percent Name Pct Grp of Total 27 HOLOPAW FINE SAND HOLOPAW 92 YES Alf] 7.6 URBAN LAND- 34 IMMOKALEE-OLDSMAR, URBAN LAND 45 UNRANKED 92.2 LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, COMPLEX 54 JUPITER-BOCA JUPITER 60 YES AID 0.4 COMPLEX TOTAL ACRES Land Cover 2019 (includes wetlands) LUCODE Description WMD YEAR Percent of Total 1110 Fixed Single Family Units SF 2017- 91 2019 1210 Fixed Single Family Units SF 2017 6 2019 4340 Upland Mixed Coniferous I Hardwood SF 2017 3 2019 TOTAL ACRES Future Land Use Acres 0.39 4.76 0.02 5.16 Acres 4.72 0.29 0.15 5.16 FLU Code Description Jurisdiction County Percent Acres of Total Urban Coastal UNINCORPORATED COLLIER 100.8 5.2 Fringe Subdistrict TOTAL ACRES 5.16 City Limits City name County Percent of Total Acres TOTAL ACRES 5.16 Census Demographics Census Tract 12021010803 FLUCCS MAP - VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS MAP Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets MapWise County Boundaries Parcel Outlines 6 62 124 186 ft Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content, laser assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppiiers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. CURRENT AERIAL Write a description for your map. 6��jLegend s Legend Legend FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS Code - Description Common Name Scientific Name Indicator status 240 / 740 DISTURBED Upland This site has been cleared and was utilized as a landscaping company. There is a large warehouse, mobile home, and a home. The site also has some planted landscaping plants. There are some planted live oak trees. In addition, there are a few Slash pines and some cypress located along the northern property line. There is also a variety of large exotics such as Java Plum and Banyan trees. The site also has a variety of palms. There is no native habitat onsite. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Banyan Ficus benghalensis Exotic Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic java plum Syzygium cumini Exotic Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic areca palm Dypsis lutescens Exotic queen palm Syagrus romanzoff ana Exotic Strangler fig Ficus aurea FAC Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Mexican clover Richardia grandiflora Exotic Air potato Dioscorea bulbifera Exotic Bahia grass Paspalum notatum UPL Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- Flat sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW Castor bean Ricinus communis FAC VINES grape vine Vitus spp. Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia Greenbrier Smilax spp. Epiphytic Plants On Planted Landscape Live oak trees Stiff - leaved Tillandsia fasiculata FDA/C Recurved T. balbisiana FDAJT Spanish moss T. usneoides NEIGHBORIG PROPERTIES 111- Single Family Home 510- Canal INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAQ, Upland (UPL) SOIL MAPS : COLLIER COUN'ZTY SOIL LEGEND REVISED 1/90 H. YAM?kTAKI �D�rc H 2 3 H a .7 8 1 1 H 1 1 1G H 17 n 18 za 21 H 22 H 23 H 25 H 27 h 28 29 h 31 32 33 3a 35 36 37 38 H p 4 H 4-3 ?5 H ag H a g H 50 H- 52 H 53 H 54 H HOLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM M_� i ABAR FS. CHOEEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND DANIA MUCKS DEPRESSIONAL r-LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM-COPELAND FS TMMOKALEE FS MYARKA FS OLDSMAR FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM z HALLANDALE FS PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 5 PO.MELLO FS OLDSMAR FS EASTNGER FS RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM FT. DRUM- AND MALABA HIGH-- FS BOCA PS CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW AND OKEELANTA SOILS DEPRESSIONAL BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUAST.thATUM AND FS DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW FS PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS WABASSO FS HILOLO LIMMSTONE SUBSTRATUM, JUPITER AND MARGATE SOILS URBAN LAND URBAN LAND HOLOPAW BASINGER COMPLEX URBAN LAND IMOKALEE OLDSMAR LTMESTONE' SUBSTRATUM COMPLEX URBAN "Z'Ni] AQUENTS COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM UDORTHENTS SHAPED `'r SCAW i LLA FS URBAN LAND MATLACHA LIMESTON-E SUBSTRATUM BOCA COMPLEX SA`r'ELLITE FS DURBIN AND WULFERT MUCKS URBAN LAND SATELLITE CQMpLEX C�LIAVERAL BEAM ES ASSOCIATION TkIi-bER, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRAZ� AND CROBEE SOJ`LS DEPRESSTONAL PAOLA FS (1-8 perceaa.t slope) EEMSUCCO SOIL (marl prai.je) HALLANDALE AND BOCA FS (slough) k 'OCHOPEE FSL, PRAIRIE (Marl) OCHOFEE FEL KESSON MUCK FREOUM7TLY FLOODED ESTERO AND pECKISH SOILS FREpUENTLy FLOODED J-t7PI TER BOCA COMPLE.; BASINGER FS, OaCPL�19W4LLY-FLOODED - HISTORICAL AERIALS AERIAL 1995 Selected Custam Parcels County Boundaries N Parcel Outlines 0 62 124 186 ft Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. s AERIAL 2004 :.-. ...� Selected Custom Parcels County Boundaries N Parcel Outlines j_ 0 62 124 185 ft Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting From such use. r�2004 AERIAL her Legend 9xr -JN si' F Il s ate• f.� v DocuSign Envelope ID: DF59lC9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B3OE4 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSP❑RTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Maple Lane Residential (Collier County, Florida) December 18, 2021 Revised June 24, 2022 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500. 00 TIS (Small -Scale Study) Review Fee =$0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATI13N ENGINEERING, 4711 7Ti-i Avmmur- SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTWORIZAT1ON No. 27B3Q WIAB PROJECT NO. 21 E391 6) INC. JAM FLOi DocuSign�edd by: �A'91t-Ld IyR"41 E519D679D23E47F... 6, �Q .tom. of 2-+•ZOZ7- NK�. V DATE DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 2 Scope of Project 3 Table A — Proposed Land Use 3 Figure 1- Project Location & E+C Road Classification 3.1 Mater Concept Plan 3.2 Project Generated Traffic 4 Table B — Site -Generated Trips 4 Table 1 - Proposed Land Use Trips Computations 4.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 5 Project Traffic Distribution 5 Area of Significant Impact 5 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 5.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 5.2 2020 thru 2026 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 6 Table 3 - 2020 & 2026 Link Volumes 6.1 Table 4 - 2026 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 6.2 Appendix — TIS Methodology 7 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that Maple Lane Residential will not have a significant or negative impact upon the surrounding road network. In fact, the project will have a de minimis impact on the adjacent road network (i.e., less than a 1 % impact on any road's adopted capacity standard). It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of impact, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed 13 single-family dwelling units. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Because Maple Lane Residential will not cause any transportation deficiencies to occur, the Developer will not be required to fund any off -site roadway improvements/mitigation, other than the payment of road impact fees, which will be used to fund a portion of the costs of area -wide improvements as established by Collier County's CIE and Long -Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). More specifically, the Developer will be required to pay for the project's portion of "consumed" capacity via payment of road impact fees. As set forth by Collier County's Impact Fee Ordinance, the fees are a pro rata assessment towards the funding of area -wide transportation improvements in order to support new growth. The amount of road impact fees paid per type of land use are determined via a "consumption -based impact fee approach", in which new development is charged based upon the proportion of vehicle -miles of travel (VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. The cost of consumed lane mile is based upon current roadway construction costs within Collier County. Therefore, the payment of road impact fees is the project's pro rata share of funding transportation improvements that are deemed necessary to support the demands generated by new growth. Site Access Conditions The project will have direct full access at the terminus of Maple Lane, which provides the project access to U.S. 41 via other intersecting local streets. Maple Lane is a two-lane local low speed road, and the site will have access at its terminus. Therefore, ingress turn lanes at the site's access will not be necessary. Methodology On October 15, 2021, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. A copy of the TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M10). 9 DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 Scope of Project Maple Lane Residential is a proposed small-scale single-family residential development that will consist of 13 single-family dwelling units. The site is located at the terminus of Maple Lane, within Collier County, Florida. Maple Lane is a two-lane local road that will provide the project access to U.S. 41 via other intersecting local streets. Table A Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Size Single -Family 13 Units DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-DO86-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B3OE4 rlar a's W< S — % f 5 Ma natla Pond Dr a rha EnterpriseAre A nua i No Airport"h.- vwe I � Ave Devonshire Bh — Redle >ioad Rn Rend , Davie Baufevartl Naplee Airport �__—(Zra — � 0Are/uleyafd�—__Gletlea BNd—------__—,.—_--— —~� I I Harrison Rd q \ $10 I NORTH Guilford Rd I �I 'r \ ftattlas a� _ _ock Thamassen Drive \ RmnGee Lane \ Gr Maple Lane Was of Cdlier Proaervs lane 1 , P unfits Street der m 0 0 LEGEND \ INTERSTATE HIGHWAY a1111111111111111P an 6—LANE ARTERIAL 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR _ — — _ _ m \ r 2—LANE ARTERIAL \ r 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL Toner Aaad Henderson Creak RAIL ROAD TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERINpo ING. ` Atan� otae Rand Maple Lane Residential Project Location & FIGURE I October 15, 2021 Roadway Classification W N T? seas M�r=�7 1 I •} 1` � 1 I I I \I 51 11 1 4`t I I 51 S II 5 1 nn.,m. uc I I 1 1 y 1 l 5 1 1 I 4 � 1 t_L_______ ! 1 A _1 j_ _ j 1 --7 II j j i I f I 4 WN,Lo =E I I I I I 1 8 CN9 11I I I I I j II L `1 1 A I I 1 i I 7 7 j j I I II I I A A A A A I I 1 II l I I I I L__-- J MT II.a!1. � ---_-7 1 1 11 I 1 1 I I I I I E 1 I 10 I I I 12 I I 13 I i i i II j 41e 44 I I j j jj i i I I 9 1 I I I I l I I 11 tom~ j II i i' L---- J — -- 1— ---J I—---J L --J I .I I og emaun ins �— I IV I 1 1 I I II I I I i t I I ' I 1 I I I II I I j I I II I i I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I II I II I 1 1 I I I I 1 I ! I 1 MAPLE LANE ® Gra.dyMinor , CONCEPT PLAN 1 1 0 0 0 c cc) 3 m 0 m 0 m DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, l l th Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses were relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use code Single - Family (LUC 210) was most appropriate in estimating the site -generated trips. As estimated, the project will generate 12 vph and 15 vph during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table B Net New Trips Generated Daily ADT AM Peak Hour h PM Peak Hour h New Trips 154 12 15 The report concludes that the project will generate less than 50 net new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "less than 50 trips", which is defined as a small-scale study. 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Maple Lane Residential Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 210 Single -Family Detached Housing 13 Units Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 210 Daily Traffic (ADT) = AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peals Hour (vph) _ Trip Generation Equation Ln(T) = 0.92Ln(X)+2.68 = Ln(T) = 0.91Ln(X)+0.12 = 26% Enter/ 74% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.94Ln(X)+0.27 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter Exit 154 ADT 12 vph 3 / 9 vph 15 vph 9 / 6 vph 4.1 DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 Existing + Committed Road Network Figure l and Table 2 provide a detail of the surrounding E + C road network. Table 2 depicts the minimum level of service performance standards and capacity for the roads within the project's area of impact. There are no planned transportation improvement projects within the project's area of impact. Project Traffic Distribution The project's traffic was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, location of surrounding businesses and commercial centers, as well as recreational attractions. Figure 2 and Table 2 provide a detail. of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Table 2 also depicts the project traffic assignment by volume. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in Table 2. DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 r A rporL fhopepeot Huples Airport =8 Bo—rd—�— Horti9an qd E 8 Guilford fld Drive I 5 Magnolia Pond Or I i� Oevoeehire Blvd Radio Roatl �TT 71m Boulevard / a =rie fd— — — — — — — — — — — — — . —f --_ I V Isles of Colller preserve E � $I NORTH N.T.S. 50/ c I 5�►Rattleeno�e mom—oa---�------ �— ` \\ Rol ydree at y � Maple Lone �p fl price $treeL � 4` 'r0 �l LEGEND Dom- Project Traffic Distribution %MTRANSPORTATION ENSINEERINC,, INC. Maple Lane Residential October 15. 2021 r. g \ o \ N e r Hentlerean Creak \ T�Dp Toner Rood Mantes Rood Project -Generated I FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution S. t Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 35.0 County Road 951 36.1 72.0 Rattlesnake Ham. 92.0 E. Tamiami Trail 93.a 93. b 94.0 95.1 Rattlesnake to Tarriami Trail Tamiami Trail to Wal-Mart Tamiami Trail to Charlemange Airport Rd to Rattlesnake Rattlesnake to Maple Ln Maple Ln to Triangle Triangle to G.R. 951 C.R. 951 to Joseph Lane 0 0 c U) m m TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT o 0 n 0 co 9 Entering 6 Exiting o CD rn N N LOS Service Project Project o PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project w Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significal o Class LOS v(_ phpd] % Dist. v�phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact W 6D E 3200 20.0% 2 S 1 N 2% 0.06% NO 6D D 2500 5.0% 0 N 0 S 2% 0.02% co NO o m 4D D 1800 5% 0 w 0 E 2% 0.03% NO 6D E 2900 65% 6 E 4 w 2% 0.20% NO 6D E 3000 70% 6 E 4 W 2% 0.21 % NO 6D E 3000 30% 3 W 2 E 2% 0.09% NO 6D E 3000 40% 4 W 2 E 2% 0.12% NO 6D D 3100 1% 0 w 0 E 2% 0.00% NO DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 2020 thru 2026 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2020 thru 2026 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used.. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were derived from the 2020 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2026 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2020 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2026 vested trips 'Y' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2026 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2020 thru 2026 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. Co 93.a E. Tamiami Trail 93.b TABLE 3 2020 & 2026 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2026 2026 Peak Hour 2020 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips tvphpd) DiR AUIR vt phpd) y{ phpol ivphpd Rattlesnake to Maple Ln 1980 E 2.00% 2230 530 2510 Maple Ln to Triangle 1980 E 2.00% 2230 530 2510 0 0 c Cn 0 m 0 m 0 CD -. 93.a E. Tamiami Trail 93. b 1% i TABLE 4 2026 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2026 2026 2020 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir v h d LOS vi uhncfl Dir LOS {vphpd} Rattlesnake to Maple Lr 1980 D 2510 E D Maple Ln to Triangle 1980 D 2510 E D 3 2026 Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir Dir (vph) Dir v{ phpd) v( phpd) E 4 W 2516 3000 W 2 E 2512 3000 0 0 c m m 0 0 0 n I u 2026 2026 0 Build -Out co Build-Ou rn Peak Hour Peak Hoi N PK Direction PK Direct! v!c Ratio LOS n 0.84 D 0.84 w D o w cn w m w 0 m DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 APPENDIX Support Documents DocuSign Envelope ID: DF59lC9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B3OE4 %TMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODOLOGY Maple Lane Residential (Collier County, Florida) October 15, 2021 CountTIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500. 00 TIS (Small -Scale Study) Review Fee =$0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 CCRTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 (JMB PRl7JECT No. 2 1119 1 4) JAME$^ BANKS, P.E. DATE FLOR A REG. No. 43860 207-t DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 APPENDIX A IMTIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:8-B-2021 Time: Location: Collier Coqnjy Government Offices(North Horseshoe Drive People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: James M Banks P.E. President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering,Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Na les Florida 34119 239 -919- 2767 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sa er Collier County Transportation Division Applicant• Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Maple Lan Residential Location: At the terminus of Maple Lane Land Use Type: Single -Family ITE Code 4: LUC 210 Proposed number of development units: 20 dwelling units Other: Description: Zoning: Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached C:lUsersymbswlDeskloplCQLL1EM210914ARaple LanclMelhodologyRepo .dac M1 DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-DO86-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B3OE4 Study Typed Small -Scale TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Based u on the Coun 's 2% 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Year(s): 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual i Oth Edition see Table I Reductions in Trio Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: Collier Count 's 5-year CIE. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment (See Table 2 & Fide 2) Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method whichever is greater. C1U. aooibsWDeskloplCOLLIERl2io9l4 Maplo LanalMethodofagyRspwtdoc M3 DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing; Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee X Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will he agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must he paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant C;tUsa Vmb$WW&skNptcoUIERI210914Mapfetanetn7etl[oWlogyReport.obr M+ DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-DO86-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B3OE4 Ave NaOA Airport ProPSOnet Xf Raplee Airport a -- � �-1---- Isles of Collier Preserve I 5 Mo nal€o Pand Or else. a Oawoneh€ra 9 —d--dd--------R---..r ' 100 Gale 6oul.. s `� —� I I m �I NORTH EE $ N.T.S. ` tftWesena==mock IN ;�L�� Rolnties Lana ` Mop. Lane S �• Lane J// LEGEND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY eew� reeee� 5—LANE ARTERIAL SENIOR 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — 2—LANE ARTERIAL 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD i fOTHANSFORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Maple Lane Residential October 15, 2021 a Q taxer Rana Henderson Creek � Manatee R-od Project Location & FIGURE 'I Roadway Classification r'S DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Maple Lane Residential Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 21.0 Single -Family Detached Housing 20 Units Land Use Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter Exit LUC 210 Daily Traffic (ADT) = Ln(T) = 0.92Ln(X)+2.71= 237 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.71(X)+ 4.80 = 25% Enter/ 75% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.96Ln(X)+0.20 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = 19 vph 5 / 14 vph 22 vph 14 / 8 vph DocuSign Envelope ID: DF591C9F-D086-4226-8DF3-C3D3353B30E4 r Airport Propspectt Noplea AirpoH Hw.rwn Rtl LLlword Rd /\ DrWe [else of Celper Preserve I �♦ I 5 Llo olio Pond Dr I I � oev«ul,lrp el� —___—_ Davis 9001erartl w XJ —�- ro _� I NORTH N.T.S. 8 I I % \ C 5o- �--�^�Ratfkmnoke Hornmuck — �—_ i �0 g� RainkreeLane`` �V �� I Maple Lone I a Lane S a x� Q PrSceStm-t LEGEND D�_ Project Traffic Distribution JMTRAN9PORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Maple Lane Residential October 15, 2021 Q � o Hendsrwn Croek ♦ l� Tower Road Manatee Rood Project -Generated FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution MI Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpo) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph)= 35.0 County Road 951 Rattlesnake to Tamiami Trail 36.1 Tamiami Trail to Wal-Mart 72.0 Rattlesnake Ham 92.0 E. Tamiami-frail 93. a 93.h 94.0 95.1 Tamiami Trail to Charlemange Airport Rd to Rattlesnake Rattlesnake to Maple Ln Maple Ln to Triangle Triangle to C.R. 951 C.R. 951 to Joseph Lane 0 0 c U) 0 m 0 m 0 TABLE 2 CD PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT o n 0 14 Entering 0 8 Exiting CD rn a N N LOS Service Project Project OD o PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project 0 Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significar o Class LOS (vphpol % Dist. (nh d) Pk Dir (vphi ❑iR Standard Impact Impact 6D E 3200 20.0% 3 s 2 N 2% 0.09% w NO w 6D D 2500 5.0% 1 N 0 5 2% 0.03% NO m a 4D D 1800 5% 1 w 0 E 2% 0.04% NO 6D E 2900 65% 9 E 5 W 2% 0.31 % NO 6D E 3000 70% 10 E 6 W 2% 0.33% NO 6D E 3000 30% 4 w 2 E 2% 0.14% NO 6D E 3000 40% 6 W 3 E 2% 0.19% NO 6D D 3100 1% 0 w 0 E 2% 0.00% NO 93.a 93.b TABLE 3 2020 & 2026 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Bate Method 2026 2026 Peak Hour 2020 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips fvphpol DiR AUIR v( phpol v[ phpd) v( phpd) E. Tamiami Trail Rattlesnake to Maple Ln 1980 E 2.00% 2230 530 2510 Maple Ln tc Triangle 1980 E 2.00% 2230 530 2510 0 0 c Cn 0 m 0 m 0 a CD -. 93.a E. Tamiami trail 93. b d TABLE 4 2026 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2026 2026 2026 2026 2020 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction v h d LOS v[ Ahpd) Dir LOS v( phpol Dir (vph) Dir (vphpd) tvphpd) v/c Ratio Rattfesnake to Maple Ln 1980 D 2510 E D E 6 W 2520 3000 0,84 Maple Ln to Triangle 1980 D 2510 E D 4 W - E 2512 3000 0.84 0 0 0 c m m 0 0 0 0 2026 CRO' rn Build-Oi P, N Peak Ho PK Direct mp! LOS w D w 0 D W W W W 0 m .�$trict School � o ZCollier Cou�'�� Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [�] type of application request (one only): mSchool Capacity Review ❑ Exemption Letter OConcurrency Determination 0 Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, I. Project Information: Project Name: 5175 Maple Lane Rezone Municipality: Collier Coun Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00439520009 Location/Address of subject property: 5175 Maple Lane, Naples, FL 34113 (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: Maple Lane and Tamiami Court II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): Wolfqanq Gilles Agent/Contact Person: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Telephone#: 239-947-1144 Fax: Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Email warnold(gradyminor.coi I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. D. Wayni 0 G i �g a rn Owner or Authorized Agent Signature ly signed by D. Wayne Arnold 2021.12.20 15:12:59-05'00' III. Development Information December 20, 2021 Date Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Fringe Proposed Land Use Designation: Residential Current Zoning:A - Agricultural Proposed Zoning:RSF-4 Project Acreage: Unit Type: SF IMF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: 1 Total Units Proposed by Type: 16 Is this a phased project: Yes o No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp: Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site 5175 Site Zone Parcel No 00439520009 Address MAPLE LN Site City NAPLES *Note 34113 *Disclaimer Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. I I EX. DE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROPERTY LINE 0 1 1 1 1 I I 1 ' I I I EX. 50' DE I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I it I I it I I it I I I I I I I I II I I I I I 0 15' 30' 60' SCALE- 1" = 30' PROPERTY LINE 'I�I - 'Il II °I 1 TRACT 'B' °II ll 1 � n rn-nF 25' ' I — I I I I I I I � J I 30' I I \ I \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ ` I \ \I \ \I \ r � 1 \ 1 I I 1\ I I \ I I \\ I II \\ \ I \ I \ I I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L-- I--II-----�--- I _ II I I I PER LDCLO N N F- F I I I II 7.5' I 30 I I I I II [7.5'[7.5 ' 7.5' 7.5' I I I I I I oo I II I I I I I C 3 I I 2 I I I ICI l i m '1 I I EX. 35' MIN. LOT SIZE I I I I I 'I MAINT. ESMT. , I 70' BY 125' I II II II II 1 (TYP) I I I I I L— J I II I EX. 60' AE C) i I I I PROPERTY LINE I ' I I I I I I \CT'R' - - - - - - - - - - - I I 1 I I II I I I I II I I I o M o I oo II I I II II I C --1 F- � F- -� I II I LU II m 1 I III W , I I �, l a II 12 I I 13 I 10 C) II I 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' I I 1 30' 1 I II I I �I I I I —N —N NLn —N —N BUFFER PER LDC PROPERTY LINE 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I of M W X W BUFFER - N i i 4 MAPLE LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN REVISED: 7/12/2022 GradyMinorl Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors Planners • Landscape Architects wwiv, Grnd,yMinor. com W z O N W W z a J W J Q Ln N I N CD z_ z z Q J I O / z z z n n 5175 Maple Lane Rezone (PL20210002449) Conceptual Water Management Plan The conceptual water management plan consists of dry detention area on the northeast part of the site. This area will collect stormwater from the entire site. The stormwater will be treated and attenuated for water quality and the 25 yr. 3-day storm event. Discharge will be to the south to the county canal through a control structure in the detention area. The design will include a perimeter berm to contain the 25 yr. storm event. Discharge will be away from the Maple Ln properties. There will be no encroachment into the Drainage Easements. April20, 2022 ® GradyMinor Page 1 of 1 Conceptual Water Management Plan. docx Cis ii Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com I I I \ I \ \ I \ ` I \ ` I \ \I \ \I \ r � I \ 1 I I I\ I I \ \ I I \ II I \ \ I \ I I 1 I I II I II L_ I I ° I CS-1 -- ----- - - ----- ----- I -- I I I I I ---------- ------�--I—T I I I I OUT FALL STRUCTURE k WATER MANAGEMENT AREA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I II II I II w Q ZE- Z 1 1 I I I I I II II II v a a • I I I i I I I II II I N S >- N I I I I I I I I I I IIwm w 1 1 I I I I II II I 1 1 I I I I I I II I I EX. DE I I — — — loo,I 1 1 I I I II II I I I - - - - - - - - - - - TRACT 'R' - - - - - - - - - � I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I Lu z I I II I I I I I I aI l II I I I TRACT 'A' I I a 1 I I I I 9 10 11 12 13 li li I I I I I i li I I I '� I I I ► I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I ', I I I � I I - - - - - - - - - - - — I I i I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4- MAPLE LANE GradyMinor 4 CONCEPT WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 0 15' 30' 60' Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors Q 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' Planners • Landscape Architects wwiv, Grnd,yMinor. com a- N N O N COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME: 5175 Maple Lane Rezone LOCATION: (Common Description) 5175 Maple Lane SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: Proposed rezone of a 5.3+/- acre parcel from the Agricultural Zoning District to the RSF-4 Zoning District to allow a maximum of 16 single family residential dwelling units. The applicant requests a waiver from conducting an archeological assessment due to the prior development which has occurred on -site. No excavation activities are proposed at this time. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Wolfgang Gilles Mailing Address: C/O German Services 3960 Radio Road, Naples, Florida34104 Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 Phone: 239-213-8614 FAX: E-Mail: jhgnaples(d),comcast.net B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Mailing Address: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 FAX: 239.947.0375 E-Mail: wamold(kgradyminor.com C. Name of owner(s) of property: Same as Applicant Mailing Address: Phone: ( E-Mail: FAX: Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk's Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: Myrtle Cove Extension (unrecorded) Plat Book N.A. Page N.A. Unit N.A. Block N.A. Lot N.A. Section 30 Township 50 S Range 26 E 2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 B. Property dimensions: Area: 230,868+ square feet, or 5.3+/- acres Width along roadway: 357± feet (Maple Lane) Depth: 677+/- feet C. Present use of property: Residential and lawn maintenance D. Present zoning classification: A, Agricultural SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. 1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Photo shows existing structures and equipment 2. Historical Land Use Description: Single family residence. 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: Improved property, sparce vegetation, parcel has been disturbed. 4. Other: No excavation activities are proposed for the site. None of the structures are historic in nature and improvements have been constructed onsite since late 1960s. B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any parry aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any parry aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 3 SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 t/2" x 14") folder. Signature of Applicant or Agent D. WMe Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: ❑ Approved on: LE ❑ Approved with Conditions on: By: (see attached) ❑ Denied on: (see attached) A, - Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 5175 Maple Lane Location Map irk 1110011113 Maple Legend q SUBJECT PROPERTY N W+ E S . PA GradyMinor Civil Engineers - Land Surveyors - Planners - Landscape Architects 110 55 0 110 Feet RNG 26 I RNG 27 18 17 1 &P^15 14 R555 0 13 18 17 CR7. CR551� RATTLESNAKE —HAMMOCK ROAD �s19 20 21 22 cn7ae 24 19 20 30 29 28 27 26 29 30 2 _a3oo' SUBJECT PROPERTY 0 R„I i I 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 .c +� Q'��f Ls.. f� # 1T� / d / • 9YF/Y /�' �4C /i/ ryk% 9 /� / 73 / ✓ Y S - ( 3�%% � S /i p�' /r,�wT/��.k �W 3 /i'�, i� ,I I I' • • 1 1� 1 1 •� � I • I • • This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at CompliancePermits@dos.MyFlorida.com for project review information. March 30, 2022 Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician G!`adyMinor Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 In response to your request on March 30, 2022, the Florida Master Site File lists no cultural resources recorded at the designated parcel found in Section 30, Township 50S, Range 26E, Collier County. When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at CompliancePermits(a�dos.MyFlorida.com. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Eman M. Vovsi, Ph.D. Florida Master Site File Eman.Vovsi(a,DOS.MyFlorida.com 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph 1 850.245.6439 fax I SiteFile@dos. state.fl.us RECORD DRAWINGS 04-92 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SOUTH SERVICE'AREA REVISION DESCRIP710N No. DATE WASTEWATER COLLECTION FACILITIES DESIGNED BY DATE JKM AUG., 1989 DRAWN BY DAIS GTL AUG., 1989 CHECKED BY DATE CJP AUG., 1989 VERTICAL SCALE HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 M 2$ 1 " = A 0r HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES, IN-C. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS ` . µ NAPLES - FORT MYERS _ BONITA SPRINGS 1, 1j" W THESE RECORD DRANANGS SNOW THE WORK COMPLETED DURING CONTRACT #3 CONSTRUCTION. THEY ARE BASED UPON DATA FURNISH® BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE ENGINEER. RAINTREE LANE STA 10+ 00 TO STA 15+ 00 DATE D1#AWING NO. 2579--1 6S PROJECT NO. 87.41 REFERENCE NO. 1�0--2.9-71 I SHEET NO. 103 OF 122 RECORD DR I AWNGS 04-92 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SOUTH SERVICE AREA REM90N DESCRtPMON NO. DATE WASTEWATER COLLECTION FACILITIES DESIGNED BY DATE 7,9 JKM AUG., 1989 a 9] DRAWN BY DATE GTL AUG., 1989 CHECKED BY DATE Cip AUG.,;L 989 VERTICAL SCALE HORIZONTAL SCALE SCALE of 1 29 1 " 1 = 'wl THESE RECORD DRAWINGS SHOW THE WORK COMPLETED DURING DRAWING NO. REFERENCE NO. CONTRACT #3 CONSTRUCTION. THEY ARE BASED UPON DATA FURNISHED BY THE MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACTOR TO THE ENGINEER. 2579-104 10-30-72 RA'mNG N 'y �s� s 5 9_ I NJ 0 * HOLE9 2 7 1 72 MAPLE LANE p 0 CT ron PR=OJECT NO. SHEET NO. ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 05: r$ , "" NAPLES - FORT MYERS - BONITA SPRINGS STA 0+00 TO STA. 11+00 87.41 104 OF 122 DATE