Loading...
CAC Agenda 09/30/20228/23/22, 3:37 PM September 8, 2022 1 Collier County, FL $ A 2 September 8, 2022 Meeting Agenda and Notice Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) Thursday, September 8, 2022 — 1:00 p.m. Collier County Board Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Third Floor, Naples, FL Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions 2022 CAC MEETING DATES I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda V. Public Comments VI. Approval of CAC Minutes May i2, 2022 VII. Staff Reports Extended Revenue Report VIII. New Business 1. ES 2022-2023 Tourist Development Council (TDC) Fund 195 Grant Application Requests o Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Grant Applications o TDC 2022 — 2023 Category A Grant Application — Beach Maintenance o TDC 2022 — 2023 Category A Grant Application — Pier Maintenance o Turtle Monitoring Grant Application o TDC 2022 — 2023 Grant Agreement — Collier County & City of Naples o City of Naples — Resolution 2022-14g57 2. ES 10-Year Plan Fiscal Year 2023 10-Year Plan 3. ES Fiscal Year 2023 — 2024 Resolution for LGFR Request o Resolution https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/advisory-boards-and-authorities/coastal-advisory-committee/cac-agendas/2022-cac-agenda Packet Pg. 50 8/23/22, 3:37 PM September 8, 2022 1 Collier County, FL $ A 2 o LGFR Application — FY 23-24 — Collier Beaches o LGFR Application — FY 23-24 — South Marco Beach • LGFR Application — FY 23-24 — Wiggins IX. Old Business X. Announcements XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date/Location October 13, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. XIII. Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Andrew Miller at (239) 252-2922. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 33oi East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/advisory-boards-and-authorities/coastal-advisory-committee/cac-agendas/2022-cac-agenda Packet Pg. 51 May 12, 2022 MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Naples, Florida, May 12, 2022 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and forthe County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: David Trecker VICE CHAIRMAN: Joseph Burke Steve Koziar Thomas McCann Jim Burke Robert Raymond Robert Roth Raymond Christman (absent) Erik Brechnitz (absent) ALSO PRESENT: Andy Miller, Coastal Zone Manager Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney Farron Bevard, Operations Analyst 1 Packet Pg. 52 May 12, 2022 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording. from the Communications, Government & Public Affairs Division, or view it online. I. Call to Order Chairman Trecker called the meeting to order at 1:04 p.m. II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum of seven was established. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. McCann moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously, 7-0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes March 10, 2022 Mr. McCann moved to approve the minutes of the March 10, 2022, meeting. Second by Vice Chairman Burke. Carried unanimously, 7-0. VII. Staff Reports 1. Extended Revenue Report "FY22 TDT Collections Revenue Report" dated March. 31, 2022. Mr. Miller reported that the good news is that TDT collections are well above what was budgeted and what we anticipated. For TDC dollars, we're 66% up from what was budgeted, and the 195 Fund is almost $3.5 Y million above what we had projected to this date. a M Chairman Trecker said a 66% positive variance overall and for the 195 Fund, a 66% positive variance? a That's remarkable. I guess there's no indication that collections are going to slow down? a) Q Mr. Miller said we're hitting the peak as we speak, so we should get one more good month and it should taper v off after that. But we've done very well so far, so I expect things to continue as well. , N N Chairman Trecker asked if there were any comments or questions. c of 0 Mr. Roth said he saw that it's 66% above budget, and that's phenomenal. I know last year we were also above budget. I wonder if we can tell if we have the data as to whether we are above or below where we were in actuality last year. I don't know to what extent the budget may have taken into account how successful things z were last year. Q Mr. Miller said if you can follow my mouse on the screen, you can see the variance over FY21, so we're 60% above where we were last year. Mr. Roth said in actual collections, not just budget? Mr. Miller said that was correct. Mr. Roth said that's great, amazing. 2 Packet Pg. 53 May 12, 2022 VII. New Business 1. Update on FY2022 Wiggins Pass & Doctors Pass Dredge Project Mr. Miller reported that there were two successful dredge projects with no real issues. We had some adverse weather that slowed things down a little bit, but we wound up completing Wiggins Pass first, about 65,000 yards, which is what we had planned and budgeted. Then we moved down to Doctor's Pass and it turned out there was not as much sand in the system as there was in January 2021, so instead of getting 25,000 yards, we wound up getting closer to around 15,500. Both projects went off well and we completed them before turtle season. Everyone is pleased that the passes are open for navigation, and we've had zero complaints. Chairman Trecker said that like the sand hauls, these dredgings are not pro forma. They're complex. I think they go underappreciated. You and your crew should get kudos for another very successful job. Congratulations. Mr. Miller said we appreciated you saying so. 2. Update on 2022 Annual Monitoring Reports Chairman Trecker told the Committee that they did a very thorough job, noting that the printout was heavy. There's a huge amount of useful data in there. Report — Collier Beaches Mr. Miller reported that all the beaches are in good shape, if not great shape. We just put a lot of sand on the beaches at south Naples, from Loudermilk Park south to the Pier, and we know that we filled a lot up at Vanderbilt Beach from Marker 22 down to the Ritz, and we also put about 30,000 tons at Pelican Bay, so all those beaches are going to be in great shape for at least a couple of years. Chairman Trecker asked Clam Bay Beach to the south, about Page 20. The shoreline changes and the changes in beach width. Markers R-39 and R-40 fall short, but they don't reflect the sand placement from d the Clam Pass dredging, which was done before these measurements were made. ea a Mr. Miller said that was correct. Chairman Trecker said that just walking the beach there, you can see that a lot of these shortfalls have m Im a been corrected, so that's certainly good news. (Mr. Miller agreed.) That's not reflected in here. The other a thing that caught my attention was Page 31, the southern portion of the Naples beaches. Markers 82 to 84 v and some of the areas south of that show significant erosion. I know that you're working with those folks N to come up with a plan. My understanding is that there's a beach access issue there, as there is in Pelican w Bay, and these folks are going to have to fork up the money themselves. c o� 0 Mr. Miller said that's correct. It's beyond our permit limits, which is 79, around 18th Ave South and after you get past that area, the access becomes kind of sparse until you get to 32nd, 33rd Avenues. But E there's a lot of stretch in there without any access, and again, it's beyond our permit limits. But we are in discussions with some players, some stakeholders in that area, for a potential future project. Obviously, Q they'll have to go through the permitting process and get some funding in place. But we've told them we'll be happy to entertain the idea of a project similar to what we do in Pelican Bay, which is basically a piggyback effort. Chairman Trecker said, Sure. So, no real impending issues there that you see? Mr. Miller said there were none. Chairman Trecker noted that the conclusio7 on pages 41 and 42 suggest no major projects. Packet Pg. 54 May 12, 2022 3. Mr. Miller said no major projects this year, barring a hurricane. Chairman Trecker asked: So any minor things, touch-up, small sand hauls? Mr. Miller said there are a couple places that we've had interest in possibly fixing up, some of the narrower sections. We met with Moorings Park residents this week and they have a little concern because there is a 90-foot, as opposed to 100-foot... Our monument right at the north side of their park. What we have asked is that we monitor again, which we are required to do at Doctors Pass, anyway, in October. And we'll see how the summer systems come through. If all goes as we hope, some of the sand that we've just placed at Lowdermilk and Naples Beach to the north and to the south of that area will hopefully migrate to Moorings Park Beach. If it becomes critical in October, if things haven't settled down and they've become worse, we may look at what we're referring to as a micro -project. But we'll wait until October to find out. Chairman Trecker asked if there were any comments or questions. Mr. Burke asked where the sand from the Clam Pass dredging goes. I know we don't do dredging there. Chairman Trecker said they place it north and south. Mr. Burke asked: Both sides? Chairman Trecker said yes, both sides and there's migration from the placement. It sometimes happens very rapidly there. Mr. Burke said it looks very healthy. Chairman Trecker said for the moment. Yeah, absolutely. Any questions or comments? Report — Central Marco and South Marco beaches `i Mr. Miller reported that Central Marco Beach and South Marco Beach are in similar shape to the Collier beaches. We just renourished South Marco in April of 2020 and reports all show that a good majority of that sand is still in place. Typically, we'll do South Marco Beach on a seven-year cycle, so if we did it in a 2020, we've got at least a couple more years, barring storms. Central Marco is one of the widest beaches we have in Collier County. The only issue we have on Central c m a Marco is sometimes we get a little bit, or a lot, of depression closer to the shoreline, but what happens a down there is if we get a depression, the rainwater sits in there and we get a black algae mat that v forms. We're going to keep a close eye on that this year and, hopefully, head that off as it N arises. Obviously, we can't do a whole lot of work before turtle season ends in November, so it would be N more of a monitoring effort than anything until then. c rn 0 ES - Humiston & Moore Engineers - South Marco Beach Restoration USACE Permit Application d E Mr. Miller said, as he mentioned earlier, we just renourished South Marco Beach in 2020 and our permit z 20 for that effort expired in January 2021, so this effort by Humiston & Moore is to get that permit Q reestablished for another 15 years and it'll be in time for our next planned renourishment at South Marco. The recommendation is to approve a Work Order with Humiston & Moore Engineers to provide professional support services for the application preparation of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit for the South Marco Island Beach Restoration under contract No. 18-7432 CZ, for time and materials not to exceed $34,132, and to make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Chairman Trecker asked if that work was co4nsistent with previous support work of this sort. Packet Pg. 55 May 12, 2022 Mr. Miller said it was. Chairman Trecker asked if there were any questions or comments. Vice Chairman Burke moved to approve a Work Order with Humiston & Moore Engineers to provide professional support services for the application preparation of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit for the South Marco Island Beach Restoration under contract No. 18-7432 CZ, for time and materials not to exceed $34,132, and made a finding that this item promotes tourism. The motion was seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0. 4. ES - Water Quality Subcommittee Report [Mr. Roth, Subcommitee Chairman] Vertical Oyster Gardens Video Mr. Roth said that before we get into the written summary, he wanted to make a few comments and then show the video. The committee looked at several possible things that could be done about promoting good water quality around Collier County. We focused seriously on a seagrass-restoration proposal. We had a presentation by CSA (Ocean Sciences Inc.) about a project they were involved in. And from what we saw, it doesn't seem to be something that would be practical to apply down here, at least right now. That program was for something up in North Carolina in the Outer Banks. The Department of Transportation put a bridge in. They had to mitigate the impact of taking out about 5 acres of seagrass, so they constructed a barrier in the bay between the Outer Banks and the shoreline. That was huge and after three or four years, it's starting to show some promise, but I just didn't see it being applicable to a location down here, and I can imagine what it cost. The State was paying for it. It was probably a mitigation measure that came out of their own Environmental Impact Review with the Army Corps of Engineers getting the permits for the bridge, so it didn't seem as simple as planting cuttings of seagrass and hoping they would grow. So, we zeroed in on a Vertical Oyster Garden Program and there's a video you may have already looked at. It's on the links that you had and will generate some questions that we can discuss. [The Video, How to Adopt and Install Vertical Oyster Gardens, was viewed.] Mr. Roth said this isn't for everyone, but we thought it was kind of a cool thing and it might induce a better level of public engagement, which is something that we could all use more of in terms of water quality here, and just bringing awareness to the issue. One thing that's interesting is they were talking about seawalls not providing enough surface area for oysters in this organic growth, but at least I see in Marco, a lot of people are getting their seawalls replaced with these corrugated plastic walls and the oysters and the barnacles don't adhere to those. So, they're not even having a place to get footing in the canals. That was really the notion of the program. We could see the County maybe making an initiative or getting some volunteers and community -based organizations to deal with the mechanics of something like they have in Sarasota. The initial thought was that we might form a working committee that would consist of County staff and people to help with this, to reach out, but I see we still have some more work to do as a Subcommittee on this. If this Committee thinks this is a worthwhile thing to pursue, we would try to meet with the Conservancy and Rookery Bay and see if we could get more of an interest in something like this. I'd like to hear from the committee. Chairman Trecker asked whether he was looking for concurrence from this group that you should study this further and gather more information. Mr. Roth said before we go out and say we're representatives of Collier County, we should explore if this is something we'd like to do in Collier County and talk to some of these organizations, rather than just do it. I think this Committee needs to be behind it and to whatever extent we need permission from Packet Pg. 56 May 12, 2022 anyone else to do something like that, we should seek that. Chairman Trecker asked if there was any sense that putting in these Vertical Oyster Gardens really could cut nutrient levels substantially? In other words, is there some indication whether it's really worth the trouble? Mr. Roth said probably not. I don't think you're going to see the water clear up from this effort, but I think it's public education, more so, that will begin to get people interested and businesses to donate these shells. Maybe they could market that, like "We donate to water quality efforts in Collier County," or something like that. It needs that marketing spend to get that kind of engagement because that's kind of lacking. Everybody talks about water quality. This is a way that people can actually do it, to have one on their dock. There was a program a few years ago that became very popular and it's still growing, the ocean habitats that a lot of people in canal homes have floating under their docks. They're just horizontal layers of material with space in between. The baby fish and crabs and others inhabit it. I have two under my dock and I have a ton of fish. Is that making the water better? Well, it's not making it worse, that's for sure. But it certainly got me engaged with the whole process, so that's what we're thinking. It certainly isn't going to hurt, spreading the word about water quality and efforts that people can do themselves. This is not going to pertain to people inland, living on a golf course. It's a limited focus group. But again, we're talking about water quality, not transportation or traffic. Chairman Trecker noted that the Committee is limited to coastal efforts. Mr. Roth said, right, so this is perfect. Chairman Trecker asked if the group promoting the VOGs have any sense of how many nutrients are being removed per string or per square area. Mr. Roth said the best we're going to get is each oyster is capable of 20 to 50 gallons of filtering a day. That's what the video said. It's a matter of how many oysters do you actually get to grow. Is it a failure, or is it not? But I think it's a step in the right direction. Chairman Trecker said it's clean and understandable. Mr. Roth said and it's fun. It's like having a goldfish tank. You go outside and say, `Oh, I got a new colony of oysters today' or `It's working.' That alone has a benefit. So, I'd like to hear from the Committee. Vice Chairman Burke said he thinks it checks the sustainability box. This is really non-invasive, it's not a chemical treatment, it's low-cost and it's something that's sustainable. One question I have is do we harvest these at some point? Mr. Roth said no, these are not for consumption. Vice Chairman Burke asked how long each strand would last, two years, three years? Mr. Roth said he asked that about his dock habitat and was told that at some point, it would get choked and it would end up in a dump. You're not going to be able to rehabilitate it. You're going to have to find a way to dispose of it. Vice Chairman Burke noted that they're not marketable due to a concern of contamination. What can we do with them then? Is there something else we can do with them? Mr. Roth said they could be recycled and they could make more VOGs out of them. Vice Chairman Burke said that from a sustaiinability standpoint, my druthers would be to see this Packet Pg. 57 May 12, 2022 married with FGCU. They could conduct a turbidity study because that's a good indication of water quality. Vice Chairman Burke said it's a relatively easy thing. It's just a secchi disc. It's another disk and you drop it in the water and you measure at what depth do you lose sight of that disk. Mr. Roth said but that changes, right? I have one myself. Vice Chairman Burke said at least it would track the data and it also gives us some ability to look at whether we're pushing a rope here because inland development is getting worse. We look at the data and we're not looking at days, weeks, months, but you want to collect, ideally, years of data because if you're seeing an upward trend and you're doing things to improve it, and it keeps degrading over time, that should be a wakeup call. Mr. Roth said that's for sure. But that's a bigger conversation we can have. I don't think these Vertical Oyster Gardens are going to alter that. There are bigger things that have to be done. Vice Chairman Burke said that's why he'd like to see this program married with data to see if it's going to improve water quality, and to possibly get grant money through the County, NOAA or FGCU. Maybe it could be a college project. Mr. Roth said there may be someone at the water school who is on top of this. Hopefully that data is out there and on our next step, we can find that. Mr. Koziar said he thinks the greatest benefit will probably be public awareness of water quality. When you start seeing these projects, it just reminds me of my children coming home from school with little victory garden projects, school experiments. It was a great way to get younger children involved in the water quality because public awareness is going to be very important, and that's really the key. When the various agencies are seeking funding, you have to have the public awareness. Just little things like that. On Marco Island, the City has a Burrowing Owls Program where if you put up a little fence around your yard and have a Burrowing Owls there, they'll pay you $100 a year or something. It increased public awareness about the owls and tortoise nests. Mr. McCann noted that the Subcommittee struggled to obtain the authority to get involved in water quality. It was quite a struggle. Not everybody liked the idea. Now that we have it, it seems to me that we've got to start doing something about it and this may not be a home run, but I'd love to get at least on the base path to the Coastal Advisory Committee being identified with water quality and the efforts to do it. So, whether or not it's a home run, it looks like it could certainly be successful to an extent. The Tampa video showed that and we could learn more as we go along. They said we could get in the game, so let's get in the game. Mr. Raymond said one of the objectives here was to get the community involved, but to even do that, we have to get CAC approval. Do you think we should move forward? There are plenty of things we can do, like contact Manatee County and find out in a little more detail what they've done. It's a start. It's not going to solve all problems, but it will definitely get the community and students involved. You could work through the Conservancy and maybe Rookery Bay. They have tours all the time, so I think it'd be interesting to at least get started. Mr. Burke agreed it's a start. Where do the VOGs come from? Does someone market them? Vice Chairman Burke said the Conservancy in that area is involved. Mr. Raymond said the restaurants also are involved. Mr. Roth said someone has to make them, to string the oyster shells. Q 7 Packet Pg. 58 May 12, 2022 Mr. McCann asked if they're best hung in inlets. Mr. Roth said they're for saline water, estuary water, canals. The water is perfect for it here because if you have oysters growing and barnacles, we don't get too many barnacles down on Marco, but we get a ton of oysters and they can grab on. But as I said, they're losing ground because the seawalls that are going in are all plastic now and they don't adhere to it. I think they like the concrete because they get the lime out of the cement. But at least they would get that out of the expired shells. Vice Chairman Burke said eventually they're going to grow on there once that plastic gets scuffed up a little bit. They have marine paint that's supposed to be no barnacles. Barnacle -free paint? Chairman Trecker said that as this moves forward, an objective should be that the County takes the lead and can push interest. I would like this to be headed by us. Everything sounds positive. Let's entertain a motion to approve further planning by the Water Quality Subcommittee on the use of Vertical Oyster Gardens to improve water quality in Collier County. Mr. McCann moved to approve further planning by the Water Quality Subcommittee on the use of Vertical Oyster Gardens to improve water quality in Collier County. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously, 7-0. Chairman Trecker noted that once this is formulated, the next step would be to go before the Board of County Commissions to get their concurrence on the program. It sounds like a great program. 5. Election of Officers Chairman Trecker noted that the election of officers usually occurs in May or June, but we aren't certain we will have a meeting in June. Mr. Roth said if it has the Coastal Advisory Committee's name on it, all the better. Chairman Trecker asked for nominations for Chairman and then closed the nominations before the full committee vote. Mr. Raymond moved to re-elect Chairman Trecker. Second by Vice Chairman Burke. Carried unanimously, 7-0. Chairman Trecker asked for nominations for Vice Chairman and then closed the nominations before the full vote. Mr. Burke moved to re-elect Vice Chairman Burke. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously, 7-0. IX. Old Business Chairman Trecker asked for a brief update on the U.S. Army Corps project. Mr. Miller said he didn't have much more to add that what he told the Committee at the last meeting. In October 2021, the report was on the verge of going to the chief for his signature and it was basically sidelined because of some cost issues that would have had a negative effect on the benefit -cost ratio, so the District was advised to go back and relook at the study. But since the deadline and the funds were expiring within the month, the District asked for a waiver request for a time extension and some additional funding. That is still being reviewed by headquarters. We have heard no additional information, so we're just in a wait -and -see mode. Chairman Trecker said he recalled him saying earlier that the Army Corps is weighing all the projects to see which should get priority. Packet Pg. 59 May 12, 2022 Mr. Miller said that was correct. The good news, as far as our project goes, is that the initial project involved some very controversial, expensive walls and gates that were part of the escalation of the cost of the concrete and steel work skyrocketing. So, those items were pulled from Recommended Course of Action No. 4, which is essentially a beach and dune project. So, a lot of the controversial items are no longer in the Recommended Course of Action. But again, that's still being reviewed by headquarters. Chairman Trecker noted that the waiver request started in October, so we know government is slow. Do we have any sense when we'll get an answer? Mr. Miller said it would just be a guess, so he's just waiting. Chairman Trecker noted that Gary McAlpin was involved. Does he know? Mr. Miller said he has been communication with the Army Corps, and there's no new information. Chairman Trecker noted that Vice Chairman Burke doesn't believe in this approach. Vice Chairman Burke noted that it's a step in the right direction, but it provides less protection and you haven't solved the flooding problem, so it's a risk. Chairman Trecker asked if there were any other comments or discussion. Mr. Koziar said he understood that there will be a meeting between the County and Marco Island to further resolve any permit issues with respect to Collier Creek and the City of Marco Island's permit for the dredging of the lagoon in front of Hideaway Beach. Mr. Miller said that was correct. They hope it will be an informative meeting regarding Collier Creek and its permit. We hope to get support from the City and move forward with FDEP and getting that permitted and ready for construction as quickly as we can. X. Announcements None XI. Committee Member Discussion None XII. Next Meeting June 9, 2022, 1 p.m. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chairman at 1:46 p.m. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee David Trecker, Chairman These minutes were approved by the Committee on. amended as presented, or as Packet Pg. 60 Collier County Tourist Development Tax Revenue 8.A.2 FY 22 TDT Collections Report 31-J u 1-2022 Fund Reporting Fund Adopted Budget Updated Annual Forecast Budgeted YTD YTD Actual Variance to Budgeted YTD Beach Park Facilities 183 184 193 194 195 196 198 758 1,068,600 1,633,003 904,351 1,469,118 564,767 TDC Promotion 10,313,100 16,816,515 8,727,926 14,924,401 6,196,475 Non -County Museums 570,100 871,210 482,473 781,823 299,350 TDCAdmin - 0 - Beach Renourishment 11,635,500 17,781,027 9,847,067 15,991,186 6,144,119 Disaster Recovery - 0 - - County Museums 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,692,590 2,000,000 307,410 TDC Capital 4,262,600 6,513,979 3,607,418 5,861,129 2,253,712 Gross Budget 29,849,900 45,615,733 25,261,825 41,027,657 15,765,833 Less 5 % Rev Res (1,492,500) 52.82% % Over/(Under) Bud 62.4% Net Budget 28,357,400 Collections Month Reported Actual Cum YTD % Budget Collected to Date % Variance FY21 Collections % Variance FY20 Collections % Variance FY19 Collections Nov 2,250,846 2,250,846 7.54% 89.780/6 61.059/6 130.070/6 Dec 2,908,930 5,159,776 17.29% 83.320/6 40.64% 143.14e/u Jan 4,495,951 9,655,727 32.35% 56.540/6 40.190/6 141.279/6 Feb 5,971,910 15,627,637 52.35% 68.859/6 31.529/o 101.369/6 Mar 6,470,936 22,098,574 74.03% 56.699/6 29.929/o 61.639/o Apr 8,355,492 30,454,066 102.02% 25.409/6 107.059/6 88.129/o May 4,833,893 35,287,959 118.22% 20.179/6 938.509/6 -19.91% June 3,093,200 38,381,159 128.58% 16.589/6 377.649/6 8.079/o July 2,646,499 41,027,657 137.45% 0.90% 133.629/6 44.569/o Aug - 41,027,657 137.459/6 n/a n/a n/a Sept 41,027,657 137.459/6 n/a n/a n/a Oct - 41,027,65; 137.45% n/a n/a n/a Total 41,027,657 41,027,657 YTD 40.15% 82.54% 56.73% 45,615,733 Budget Comparison 5 Yr History -Cum 5 Yr History- Monthly Budgeted Collections Actual Collections Budget to Actual Variance Updated Forecast Nov Dec 4.1% 4.1% 5.4% 1,214,583 2,250,846 1,036,263 2,250,846 9.5% 1,612,820 2,908,930 1,296,110 2,908,930 Jan 18.2% 8.7% 2,603,922 4,495,951 1,892,029 4,495,951 Feb 30.5% 12.3% 3,665,032 5,971,910 2,306,878 5,971,910 Mar 44.6% 14.1% 4,216,359 6,470,936 2,254,577 6,470,936 Apr 61.9% 17.3% 5,175,604 8,355,492 3,179,888 8,355,492 May 72.7% 10.8% 3,209,421 4,833,893 1,624,472 4,833,893 June 79.0% 6.3% 1,892,959 3,093,200 1,200,240 3,093,200 July 84.6% 5.6% 1,671,124 2,646,499 975,375 2,646,499 Aug 90.4% 5.7% 1,709,348 - - 1,709,348 Sept 94.9% 4.6% 1,371,164 1,371,164 Oct 100.0% 5.1% 1,507,563 - - 1,507,563 Total 100.0% 100.0%1 29,849,900 1 41,027,657 15,765,833 45,615,733 over/(under) budget 62.4 % Tourist Development Tax Collection Curve $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 - aag�aa cull«dens $5,000,000 �ARual Collections $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 o Month Reported N N O N tp L O E d -W d co d O r-r E E O C) O N Q R r N fg O 0 �r a F:\OMB\TDC Revenue\TDC Update Report\2022\09-TDC Updates July Packet Pg. 61 N d (ZZOZ 18 jegLueldes OOIIIW aOO AJOsinpd JBISBOO : LMZ) 101OOd epu06br OVO - ZZ•80.60 :IuGwt43Bl)v CD CO r- LO LO O O N M M o m r O ti"M ' r ' "r- w m N It CO O I ti co LO U- O\ O o o o 0 V -a a) CO LO 0 r 0 N r O M Lf) N O r- O C> V O r ti NCO CO 0 0 c N N m O O N O O N O O-MO COm L CO co i LO > > U m 0 CO CO O N O N O N ' 000 ' L~C) >- N r V o0 r O r Lf) OO N N m LL r- O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e +O- t) C O 00 O O 0 O CO O O y f- CD O N N Lf) O � N Q Lf) Lf) 0 c� 0 0 CO r lf� O O Lf) co co c c - c LO r r r? N r i- O0 t- M CO v v- M N O M I- M W U r M M r > O o O M r CO co O 0 0 co LO r Mcm 0" O 0" >- } O N ONO 0 0 ONo r CO N LL O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � O OO CO CO V rt+ w N M Lf) m 00 O CO O r- 00 Lf) Q N N C6 LO 00 G r C' N O to 6606 r O C C C r ci O L C o00 0 > U M Lf) O ti 0 0) CV) o IV +-' U) f0 O r r N O 1- N O 7 O13 lf) CD N , O , O CA I N O N c U) ce) M r r r 00 O O M r lei LO O O o\\\\\\\ \ o 0 0 4- Q Q O N CO O0 O0 I,- O U)r +' O Lf) M Lf) M ce) O N O N N O lfj Lf) Ln Ln Ln (V 0 r CO r ti r N O d m �+ N N N N O OD OD N ti ti CM ti CM ti CM } 0 O U- \ d r M LO � r r r r fM r r r r U ? a o H T- a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O 0 0 CO CO ti ti ti ti CO 0 Lf) 0 Lf) Lf) m m m r- LO Q CO r r ' Lf) ' O CO O 0) O Lf) C) OO N M cO Lf) CO O O r cO CO CO 0 Lc N M CO O[�- M 0 CD O) le N L j O Lo O Lf) m I,: 00 � m f� � f� f- f- f- f- (V m O - CO LO O O N co 0) ,Y M N Lfi r O N O O O qt 00 N 00 M N O N o N o N 0 N CD r 0 N r co E N Lf) O LO N O LO 00 r r r r >- w cm 3 r N M M Mqt 'It le LL 0 U Q O r o CO N M O O) U)CO of o0 M O U) O r O M O 0) ' O) 00 0 N 0) ' ' ' ' � 0) > O OO LO r 0 LO M M CO Lf) -a M M LO (0 00 00 j to Lo O O) � � Lo M O , co 00 00 O) 0) 0) 0) 0) m N 0) � O) T M OD O CO m V N N Lf) CO 00 � M N C l O Q O wz E v ++ a) L O N i Q O c L N O i> 7 O O) C) 0 s? Q C6 C 5 O O Z LL Q U) 0 fi U -he O +�+ c Oc + O o E a' �+ c Gii p p aai L, o a _ 01 U. z m 0 u 0 (ZZOZ 18 j0gLueld0g GOIII WOO AJOsinpd JBISBOO : LMZ) 101OOd epu06br OVO - ZZ•80.60 :IUGW143BIIV C0 O r 0 C0 N M O O CO � M M o CO O O O O";t CO N";t tM r L!) ti CO N O CO m- O m M M C0 O � I` o 04 g m O O I� I- m m O"t 0 I� CD T.- L N N LL) O CO �i M N r r r L Q U 0 fC M O O CO I- CO N O o M CO r N I- ti CO I- ti M C, +�+ N— 0 M 0 M� N M ' ' ' CO 'O a O M m m 0 o r- N O � oto = v O N CO M N r CO N O I- u W N N C r O1 j r _ a }das m > I } L c0 O r o c0 N M O O) h Ony 0 0 0� N V N C�0 0 _ COO q' to0 i fC O ++ m N 0 O 0 I� O In M M a0 O O c0 N o C 3 n f Qy N N't mO O't M N � O U � C aunf V CO CO O N N N NM CO Ln � O r N 0� LO N� CO � t0 CO C0 O O Z X N LO CO 0) 0 CO) C0 � O r M r LO CA 0)v d O 'It N CO) LO C0 LO 0) N r 0) r h 0) AeW r N r CO 0 C0 CO CO r N I- r O N O CO I- CO O 1- I- CO) O* L!) CO �b }r a O y r r C, M V o M r r r r r 0) v cr O N c m U ady O o 0 ^^ i.f. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ei I� M ,--I M 00 M l0 I� l0 ,-I O a j a e W 00 O l0 N N Lf1 00 CN Q% r _N 2 C qad } 0 LO�L 3 uef o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a-i Ln N Ln LO 01 I� O LO a1 O O U rn oo c� ri ni rn� o� o 0 0 .� m y Lo oo rn rn o o aa4 2 L AON C 0 C 0 0 C c o C 0 O N •L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L3 O O O O O O C O C Q- > U O L L >, N >, 0) U _ LO E O z0�LL N O C) O Q Q���Qcn0�o M C =( .-• V d to 7 m T v a a D U 0 m 0 i N N 0 N i 0 a v v Q D U H N c N Cl) U 0 H i 00 2 0 i LL 8.A.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the Tourist Development Council Grant application requests from the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island and Collier County for FY 2022-2023 in the amount of $4,155,100; budget these expenditures, approve an Agreement with the City of Naples; and make a finding that these expenditures promote tourism. OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of Tourist Development Fund 195 Grant application requests for FY 2022-2023 in the amount of $4,155,100. CONSIDERATIONS: To review and approve the received TDC Grant Applications as follows: FY 2022-2023 Tourist Development Council Fund 195 Grant Applications STAFF PROJECT / DESCRIPTION: REQUESTED RECOMMENDED Beach Renourishment Projects 90067 - Park Shore Beach Renourishment Program $ 200,000 $ 200,000 90069 - Clam Pass Beach Renourishment Program $ 100,000 $ 100,000 90076 - Tiger Tail Beach Access Road Expansion $ 170,000 $ 170,000 90065 - Local Government Funding Request LGFR $ 25,000 $ 25,000 80366 - USACE Feasibility Stud $ 500,000 $ 500,000 SUB -TOTAL $ 995,000 $ 995,000 Inlet Projects 80288 - Wiggins Pass Dredging $ 25,000 $ 25,000 90549 - Doctor's Pass Dredging $ 25,000 $ 25,000 88032 - Clam Pass Dredging Pelican Bay) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 90072 -Collier Creek Modeling, Jetty Rework & Channel Trainin $ 125,000 $ 125,000 SUB -TOTAL $ 425,000 $ 425,000 Regulatory 80171 - Beach Tilling - County Wide $ 30,000 $ 30,000 90033 - Near Shore Hardbottom Monitoring & Seagrass Monitoring $ 230,000 $ 230,000 90297 - Shorebird Monitoring $ 25,000 $ 25,000 90536 - City/CountyCity/County Physical Beach & Pass Monitoring $ 170,000 $ 170,000 99999 - Sea Turtle Monitoring Program - Collier Count $ 171,700 $ 171,700 SUB -TOTAL $ 626,700 $ 626,700 AM Beach Maintenance 90527 - Beach Maintenance - City of Naples $ 197,000 $ 197,000 90533 - Beach Maintenance - Collier County & Marco Island $ 506,800 $ 506,800 SUB -TOTAL $ 703,800 $ 703,800 Packet Pg. 64 8.A.2 Structures 90096 - Naples Pier Repair & Maintenance $ 200,000 $ 200,000 SUB -TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Administration 0 -Fund 195 Administration Costs r.9.90,1,9 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 5 - Fund 185 Project Management & Administration $ 817,600 $ 817,600 5 - Tax Collector Fees 2.5% $ 312,000 $ 312,000 SUB -TOTAL $ 1,204,600 $ 1,204,600 TOTAL GRANTS $ 4,155,100 $ 4,155,100 Beach Renourishment Projects: Exceptional beach experience for our residents and visitors has been at the heart of our success in the past. These projects are required to maintain that experience. Approval is recommended. Inlet Projects: Projects required to maintain the beaches, inlets, and the engineering and permitting required to support construction. Approval is recommended. Regulatory and Permit Compliance: All these items are required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit, required by law or required to maintain critical programs between required permit activities. Approval is recommended. Beach Maintenance: Beach maintenance is required along with beach renourishment to experience an exceptional experience for our visitors and residents. Collier County conducts the beach maintenance on behalf of the City of Marco Island. Approval is recommended. Structures: The City of Naples is requesting $200,000 in grant funding for the maintenance, upkeep, and safety of the Naples pier. Approval is recommended. Administration: Administrative program and project management cost to manage the beach program. Approval is recommended. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Year 2022-2023 proposed Beach Renourishment Fund (195) budget appropriates funding for these grant applications. The source of funds is the Tourist Development Tax. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the growth management plan related to this action. ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS: The Tourist Development Council (TDC) approved this item unanimously at its June 27, 2022 meeting. The Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) will review this item at its meeting on September 8, 2022. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. — CMG RECOMMENDATION: To approve the Tourist Development Council Grant application requests from the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island and Collier County for FY 2022-2023 in the amount of $4,155,100; budget these expenditures; approve an Agreement with the City of Naples; and make a finding that these expenditures promote tourism. Prepared By: Andrew Miller, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division Packet Pg. 65 STAFF PROJECT / DESCRIPTION: REQUESTED RECOMMENDED Beach Renourishment Projects ow 90067 - Park Shore Beach Renourishment Program $ 200,000 $ 200,000 90069 - Clam Pass Beach Renourishment Program $ 100,000 $ 100,000 90076 - Tiger Tail Beach Access Road Expansion $ 170,000 $ 170,000 90065 - Local Government Funding Request (LGFR) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 80366 - USACE Feasibility Study $ 500,000 1 $ 500,000 SUB-TOTALI S 995,000 1 $ 995,000 Inlet Projects 80288 - Wiggins Pass Dredging $ 25,000 $ 25,000 90549 - Doctor's Pass Dredging $ 25,000 $ 25,000 88032 - Clam Pass Dredging (Pelican Bay) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 90072 - Collier Creek Modeling, Jetty Rework & Channel Training $ 125,000 $ 1251000 SUB -TOTAL $ 425,000 $ 425,000 Regulatory 80171 - Beach Tilling - County Wide $ 30,000 $ 30,000 90033 - Near Shore Hardbottom Monitoring & Seagrass Monitoring $ 230,000 $ 230,000 90297 - Shorebird Monitoring $ 25,000 $ 25,000 90536 - City/County Physical Beach & Pass Monitoring $ 170,000 $ 170,000 99999 - Sea Turtle Monitoring Program - Collier County $ 171,700 $ 171,700 SUB-TOTALI $ 626,700 1 $ 626,700 Beach Maintenance 90527 - Beach Maintenance - City of Naples $ 197,000 $ 197,000 90533 - Beach Maintenance - Collier County & Marco Island $ 506,800 $ 506,800 SUB -TOTAL $ 703,800 $ 703,800 Structures 90096 - Naples Pier Repair & Maintenance I $ 200,000 $ 200,000 SUB-TOTALI S 200,000 1 $ 200,000 Administration 90020 - Fund 195 Administration Costs $ 75,000 $ 75,000 99195 - Fund 185 Project Management & Administration $ 817,600 $ 817,600 99195 - Tax Collector Fees (2.5%) $ 312,000 $ 312,000 SUB -TOTAL $ 1,204,600 $ 1,204,600 TOTAL GRANTS $ 4,155,100 $ 4,155,100 N N O N 00 m E m 0. m co m E E 0 v 0 a 0 0 0 a Packet Pg. 66 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Park Shore Beach Renourishment Program FY23/24 (Project No. 90067) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Engineering Services for Development of Construction Plans and Specifications (R-44 -T-54) 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $200,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. CU c as a U a U N N W O CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 67 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Park Shore Beach Renourishment Program FY23/24 (Project No. 90067) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 200,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 200,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Engineering Services TOTAL $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 68 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Clam Pass Beach Renourishment Program FY23/24 (Proiect No. 90069) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Engineering Services for Development of Construction Plans and Specifications (R-42 - R-43.5) 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $ 100,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. CU c as a U a U N N W O CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 69 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Clam Pass Beach Renourishment Program FY23/24 (Project No. 90069) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 100,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 100,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Enineerinj4 Services TOTAL $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 70 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Tiger Tail Beach Access Expansion (Project No. 90076) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: This project is to widen the access road between Tigertail Park pavilion to Tigertail beach to accommodate trucks and large construction equipment. 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $ 170,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. c as a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 71 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Tiger Tail Beach Access Expansion (Project No. 90076) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 170,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 170,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Contractual Services TOTAL $ 170,000.00 $ 170,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 72 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Local Government Funding Request (LGFR) for FDEP (Project No. 90065) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Consultant support to develop the FY24/25 LGFR Grant Applications to FDEP for partial program funding 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $25,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. CU c as a U a U N N W O CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 73 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Local Government Funding Request (LGFR) for FDEP (Project No. 90065) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 25,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 25,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Consultant Support FY24/25 LGFR $ 25,000.00 TOTAL $ $ 25,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 74 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance USACE Feasibility Study Technical Support (Proiect No. 80366) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Engineering and technical support for the USACE Feasibility Study 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $ 500,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( X ) No ( ) as lid U cu a. CU as a U a U N N W O CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 75 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) USACE Feasibility Study Technical Support (Project No. 80366) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 500,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 500,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Engineering and Technical Support $ 500,000.00 TOTAL $ $ 500,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 76 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Wiggins Pass Monitoring (Project No. 80288) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Monitoring of Wiggins Pass required by FDEP 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $25,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. c as a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 r- W E U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 77 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Wiggins Pass Monitoring (Project No. 80288) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 25,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 25,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Contractual Services TOTAL $ 25,000.00 $ $ 25,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 78 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Doctor's Pass Monitoring (Proiect No. 90549) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Monitoring of Doctor's Pass required by FDEP 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $25,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. c as a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 r- W E U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 79 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Doctor's Pass Monitoring (Proiect No. 90549) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 25,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 25,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Engineering Services TOTAL $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 80 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Clam Pass Dredging (Pelican Bay) (Proiect No. 88032) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Clam Pass Dredging 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $250,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes (X) No () as lid U cu a. c as a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 a� E U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 81 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Clam Pass Dredtin2 (Pelican Bay) (Project No. 88032) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 250,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 250,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Contractual Services TOTAL $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 82 8.A.2 1. COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Collier Creek Modeling, Jetty Rework & Channel Training (Proiect No. 90072) Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Dredging, Jetty Rework, and Permeable Groin Installation, recommended for approval. 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $125,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes (X) No () as lid U cu a. CU c as a U a U N N W O CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 83 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Collier Creek Modeling, Jetty Rework & Channel Training (Project No. 90072) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 125,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 125,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Contractual Services TOTAL $ 125,000.00 $ 125,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 84 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Beach Tilling — County Wide (Proiect No. 80171) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Beach tilling is required by FDEP permit and is performed directly prior to turtle nesting season. Tilling is paid for on a per acre basis for re -nourished beaches. Approval is recommended. 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $30,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. c as a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 85 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Beach Tilling — County Wide (Proiect No. 80171) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 30,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 30,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Contractual Services TOTAL $ 30,000.00 $ $ $ 30,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 86 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Near Shore Hardbottom Monitoring (Proiect No. 90033) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Biological Monitoring is required by FDEP permit to determine the health of the near shore hardbottom as a result of the recent renourishment. Approval is recommended 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $230,000.00 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) as lid U cu a. c as a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 r- W E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 87 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Near Shore Hardbottom Monitoring (Project No. 90033) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 230,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 230,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Engineering Fees / Consultant TOTAL $ 230,000.00 $ 230,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 88 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Shorebird Monitoring (Project No. 90297) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: v Shorebird Monitoring is required for Vanderbilt, Park Shore, as Naples, and Marco South Beaches by FDEP permit. Approval is a recommended a c as 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 a U a 6. Estimated project duration: 12 Months v N N 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $25,000.00 0 rn 0 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X) a Packet Pg. 89 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Shorebird Monitoring (Project No. 90297) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 25,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 25,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Contractual Services TOTAL $ 25,000.00 $ $ 25,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 90 8.A.2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance City/County Physical Beach and Pass Monitoring (Vanderbilt, Clam Pass Beach, Park Shore, Naples, Marco South Beaches, along with Wiggins, Doctors, Collier Creek & Caxambas Passes (Project No. 90536) Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman Details of Project- Description and Location: Physical Beach Monitoring is required by FDEP permit and future renourishment. Beaches monitored will be Vanderbilt, Clam Pass Beach, Park Shore, Naples, Marco South and the southern portion of Barefoot Beach. Passes monitored will be Wiggins, Doctors, Collier Creek and Caxambas. Approval is recommended Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 Estimated project duration: 12 Months Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $170,000.00 If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No (X ) Packet Pg. 91 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) City/County Physical Beach and Pass Monitoring (Vanderbilt, Clam Pass Beach, Park Shore, Naples, Marco South Beaches, along with Wiggins, Doctors, Collier Creek & Caxambas Passes (Proiect No. 90536) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 170,000.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 170,000.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Engineering Fees TOTAL $ 170,000.00 $ 170,000.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 92 8.A.2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Beach Cleaning/Maintenance — Collier County/Marco Island (Proiect No. 90533) Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman Details of Project- Description and Location: Maintenance of Barefoot Beach, Vanderbilt Beach, Clam Pass Beach, Park Shore Beach, and Marco Island Beach, and is recommended for approval. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 Estimated project duration: 12 Months Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $ 506,800.00 If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes (X) No ( ) Packet Pg. 93 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Beach Cleaning/Maintenance — Collier County/Marco Island (Project No. 90533) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AM NT TDC Funds Requested $ 506,800.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 506,800.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Operating Expenses TOTAL $ 506,800.00 $ 506,800.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 94 8.A.2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Fund 185 Administration Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Andrew Miller — Manager — Coastal Zone Management Address: 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.252.2922 Organization's Chief Official and Title: Board of County Commissioners (BCC) William L. McDaniel, Jr. — BCC Chairman Details of Project- Description and Location: This item funds County Staff to manage the projects, maintain the beaches, administer the program and is broken down as follows: Staff includes the CZM Manager; Operations Analyst; a Project Manager; a Field Supervisor; (2) Equipment Operators to clean and maintain the County and Marco beaches. Indirect Administrative Costs required for administrative functions like purchasing, information technology, motor pool and human resources; Current rent; Division Fiscal support; and charges for the Tax Collector are also included. Approval is recommended. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 Estimated project duration: 12 Months Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $1,204,600.00 If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes (X) No ( ) Packet Pg. 95 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application (Page 2) Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Fund 185 Administration PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 1,204,600.00 City/Taxing District Share $ - State of Florida Share $ - Federal Share $ - TOTAL $ 1,204,600.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Administration Cost 185 Project Management & Administration Tax Collector Fees (2.5%) TOTAL $ 75,000.00 $_817,600.00 $ 312,000.00 $ 1,204,600.00 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 96 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Naples Beach Maintenance (Project Title) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: City of Naples 735 81h Street South Naples, Florida 34102 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Chad Merritt, Community Services Interim Director Address: 280 Riverside Circle City Naples ST FL ZIP 34102 Phone: (239) 213-7120 FAX: (239) 213-7130 Other: cmerrittknaplesgov.com 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Jay Boodheshwar, City Manager 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: Description: This is an annual TDC funded project essential for support of maintenance on local beaches. The City is responsible for the upkeep and grooming of TDC eligible beaches within the City limits. Under this project, the City removed litter, accumulation of algae and rocks along public access beach portions of the Gulf within the City's jurisdictional limits. Funding is a benefit to both residents and tourist populations, and to the preservation of the beach, shoreline and its overall appearance and investment. This year's request includes the partial reimbursement for beach maintenance equipment operator, landscape techs, and service workers salaries. FY 23 total cost for beach maintenance personnel is $378,921 for salaries only. Requested amount of $197,000 is a decrease from last year's approved amount of $203,000. Location: Significate coordination of effort continues between the City and Collier County concerning beach maintenance. The project boundary location is from southernmost 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $197,000 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes( ) No (X ) Packet Pg. 97 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application Page 2 Naples Beach Maintenance (Project Title) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $197,000 City/Taxing District Share $ State of Florida Share $ Federal Share $ TOTAL $197,000 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Beach Maintenance Staff Salaries $197,000 $ TOTAL $197,000 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beacb Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and -agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. 's Chief Official j Date Packet Pg. 98 8.A.2 EXHIBIT A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ELIGIBILITY: Beach Maintenance activities will take place on beach area that are least 80% classified as eligible under the TDC guidelines. The project boundary location is from southernmost State -permitted beach cleaning area within the City's jurisdictional boundary to Clam Pass in Collier County. ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY: The City of Naples will be the primary recipient and lead agency for controlling and completing all aspects and activities proposed in this grant application. The City will remain the lead agency for the duration of funding and will be the sole point of contact for all matters related to this proposal. The City has the managerial and financial capability to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project described in this application. BUDGET ASSURANCES: Dual Compensation: If a City project staff member or consultant is involved simultaneously in two or more projects, the staff will not be compensated for more than 100% of their time for any such dual involvement. PROJECT LOCATION MAP: Packet Pg. 99 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Naples Pier Annualized Repair and Maintenance (Project Title) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: City of Naples 735 8t' Street South Naples, Florida 34102 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Chad Merritt, Communitv Services Interim Director Address: 280 Riverside Circle City Naples ST FL ZIP 34102 Phone: (239) 213-7120 FAX: (239) 213-7130 Other: cmerritt6rnaylesgov.com 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Jay Boodheshwar, City Manager 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: This annual TDC funded project includes labor, material, supplies and equipment for the upkeep and safety of the pier. The Naples Pier is a public access beach facility and a tourist attraction and destination. The pier structure has a shoreline erosion control and beach preservation effect. The public safety through the continued maintenance of the Naples Pier is of paramount importance. Repair and maintenance issues include the Naples Pier structure, wooden deck, railings, restrooms, concession building, shade structures, storage facilities, light fixture replacement, painting, staining, fish cleaning tables, as well as water and electrical systems and other areas related to the Naples Pier. The Pier, a historically significant structure originally constructed in 1887, serves as a public access beach facility, as a major tourist attraction and vacation destination. The Naples Pier captures non -county and local visitors as well as tourist populations from through -out the region and world. 5. Estimated project start date: October 1.2022 6. Estimated project duration: 12 months 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: $200,000 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes( ) No (X ) Packet Pg. 100 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application Page 2 Naples Pier Annualized Repair and Maintenance (Project Title) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 200,000 City/Taxing District Share $ State of Florida Share $ Federal Share $ TOTAL $ 200,000 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Labor, Repair, Maintenance, Supplies $200,000 $ $ TOTAL $ 200,000 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Sig re of Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 101 8.A.2 EXHIBIT A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ELIGIBILITY: The pier structure is no more than one-half mile from apublic beach facility, public access point, and hotel or motel facilities and is on a beach area classified as eligible. ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY: The City ofNaples will be the primary recipient and lead agency for controlling and completing all aspects and activities proposed in this grant application. The City will remain the lead agency for the duration of funding and will be the sole point of contact for all matters related to this proposal. The City has the managerial and financial capability to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project described in this application. BUDGET ASSURANCES: Dual Compensation: If a City project staff member or consultant is involved simultaneously in two or more projects, the staff will not be compensated for more than 100% of their time for any such dual involvement. Packet Pg. 102 8.A.2 N N O N O L E d f+ Q d d E E 0 U 0 a Cu Cu 0 U M M N rr d Y V R d f3 C d a1 Q U a U N N Co O O O C E t V R r Q Packet Pg. 103 8.A.2 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Collier County Sea Turtle Protection Program/Environmental Compliance Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: Collier County Parks and Recreation Department North Collier Regional Park 15000 Livingston Road Naples, FL 34109 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Name: Barry Williams, Director Address: 15000 Livingston Road City: Naples, FL, 34109 Phone: 239-252-4035 FAX: 239-514-8657 Other: 239-280-7035 3. Organization's Chief Official and "Title: Barry Williams, Director Collier County Parks and Recreation Division 4. Details of Project- Description and Location: The following activities require coastal construction permits from the State of Florida and thus a sea turtle monitoring program. I. Beach nourishment; 2. Construction, excavation or maintenance of coastal inlet and related shoals; 3. Beach cleaning and grooming activities landward of the mean high-water line. 4. Beach cleaning following a red tide or storm event. The following excerpts from current regulations (Chapter 16B-41 Rules and Procedures for Application for Coastal Construction Permits, Florida Administrative Code), provides for the scope of the permitting process and protection of marine turtles as it relates to the aforementioned activities. 1611-41.001 Scope This chapter provides the requirements and procedures for the issuance, denial, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension and revocation of coastal construction permits. In this Chapter Coastal Construction is defined as "any work or activity on or encroaching upon Packet Pg. 104 8.A.2 sovereignty lands of Florida, below the mean high-water line of any tidal water of the state, which is likely to have a material physical effect on existing coastal conditions or natural shore and inlet processes." 1613-41.0055 Protection of Marine Turtles (Florida Administrative Code) (1) In keeping with the Departments Authority to protect marine turtles pursuant to Section 370.12, Florida Statutes, any application for a permit under this Chapter for coastal construction that affects marine turtles shall be subject to the conditions and requirements for marine turtle protection as part of the permitting process. (2) The Department shall require appropriate measures to protect marine turtles and their habitat, such as: nest surveys, nest relocation, nest marking, modification of coastal construction, measures to reduce sand compaction, and short and long term monitoring to assess the impacts of the permitted coastal construction on marine turtles and their habitat. The Parks and Recreation Department, marine turtle permit holders for Collier County, monitor the following beaches for sea turtle activities as State and federal permit requirements for beach renourishment, beach raking, allowance for the use of vehicles on the beach for surveys, beach cleanup following a red tide or storm event and special events . Barefoot Beach: construction, excavation or maintenance of Wiggins Pass (only that area included within the area of influence of Wiggins Pass; 1 mile north of Pass south to Wiggins Pass); pass material disposal location (renourishment); beach cleaning following a storm event and red tide Vanderbilt Beach: beach nourishment; construction, excavation or maintenance of a coastal inlet and related shoals (Wiggins Pass and Clam Pass); beach cleaning and grooming activities landward of the mean high-water line. Park Shore: beach nourishment; construction, excavation or maintenance of a coastal inlet and related shoals (Clam Pass and Doctors Pass). Upland sand temperature studies as required by the State. City of Naples: beach nourishment; construction, excavation or maintenance of a coastal inlet and related shoals (Doctors Pass and Gordon Pass) City of Marco Island: construction, excavation or maintenance of a coastal inlet and related shoals (Big Marco Pass and Caxambas Pass); Beach nourishment; Hideaway Beach T-Groin; beach cleaning and grooming activities landward of the mean high-water Iine. The duties and associated costs of the program are as follows: 1. Administrative/permitting 2. Reconnaissance and beach zoning including installation and maintenance of DNR location reference monuments for CZM and Sheriff department 500 feet increments along 26 miles of beach 3. Daily monitoring (7 days/wk./beach -April 01-May 01 depending on renourishment schedules through Oct.31) 4. Evaluation, mapping and data entry Packet Pg. 105 8.A.2 5. Responding to sea turtle disorientations (associated with renourishment and beach profile, as required by the State) 8. Reports (Sea Turtle Protection Plan- Annual Report; special reports per each beach nourishment and T-groin units, Index Nesting Beach Reports (Vanderbilt); State Productivity Reports, Beach Compaction Reports) 9. Mobilization/demobilization- 10. Vehicle maintenance- ATV's, penetrometers, data loggers 11. Supplies- acquisition, maintenance, inventory 12. Sand studies including beach compaction, sand temperature and ground/surface water studies and associated reporting requirements 13. Dune vegetation monitoring and exotic removal 14. Nest relocation in construction areas 15. Monitoring and reporting of escarpments 16. Additional studies required as required State/Federal permits (Florida Statute Chapter 161-053 F.A.C. Chapter 62b-33) 17. Stranding reports and removal of injured, sick and dead sea turtles from all County beaches (average 50-100/yr). 18 Public awareness- news media and public speaking upon request. 19. State mandated beach lighting compliance inspections and follow-up 21. Assist with maintaining rope and posting along the dunes 22. Other duties as requested by CZM Department 23. Provide technical assistance and respond to data requests from coastal engineering consultants upon request. The purpose of this application is to obtain funds to perform the requirements of a sea turtle protection program in the specified locations. 5. Estimated project start date: October 1, 2022 6. Estimated project duration: One (1) year 7. Total TDC Tax Funds Requested: S 171,700 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes ( ) No ( X) Packet Pg. 106 8.A.2 Collier County Tourist Development Council Category "A" Grant Application Page 2 Collier County Sea Turtle Protection Program/Environmental Compliance PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested $ 171,700.00 City/Taxing District Share $ State of Florida Share $ Federal Share $ TOTAL $ 171,700.00 PROJECT EXPENSES: (Engineering, Mobilization, Contractor, Monitoring etc) Personnel and Operating S 166,500 Capital -Replacement ATV $ 5,200 TOTAL S 171,700 1 have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. "Y lel�', -,4-- &� _dys�� I Q—C 2.1. Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date Packet Pg. 107 8.A.2 2022-2023 TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE CITY OF NAPLES CATEGORY "A" CITY OF NAPLES' PROJECTS THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this/,E day of , 2022, by and between the City of Naples, ("GRANTEE") and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, ("COUNTY"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, CITY has submitted two grant applications for Tourist Development Tax Funds in the aggregate amount of Three Hundred Ninety -Seven Thousand Dollars ($397,000) for the City of Naples' Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Staff Salaries ($197,000) and for Naples Pier Repair and Maintenance ($200,000.00) for fiscal year 2022-2023 as described in Exhibit "A," Grant Applications, to this Agreement (the "Projects"); and WHEREAS, the Coastal Advisory Committee and the Tourist Development Council have reviewed the Grant Applications and made recommendations to approve funding these expenditures and have also made recommended findings that these expenditures promote tourism; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to fund the Projects with Tourist Development Tax and finds that these expenditures promote tourism. NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND PREMISES PROVIDED HEREIN AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF WORK. GRANTEE prepared detailed applications outlining the Projects to be accomplished, along with a project budgets, as part of the grant application process, attached as Exhibits "A." GRANTEE shall provide the project activities outlined in the Grant Application C Packet Pg. 108 8.A.2 within the budgeted amounts provided in the Grant Application. GRANTEE shall not be reimbursed for any expenditures not included in the Grant Application nor be reimbursed for amounts in excess of those provided in the Grant Application unless an amendment to this Agreement is entered into by GRANTEE and COUNTY. 2. PAYMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT. The aggregate maximum reimbursement under this Agreement shall be Three Hundred Ninety -Seven Thousand Dollars ($397,000). GRANTEE shall be paid in accordance with the fiscal procedures of COUNTY upon submittal of an invoice and upon verification that the services described in the invoice are completed or that goods have been received. 2.1 GRANTEE shall determine that the goods and services have been properly provided and shall submit invoices to the County Manager or his designee. The County Manager, or his designee, shall determine that the invoice payments are authorized and the goods or services covered by such invoice have been provided or performed in accordance with such authorization. The budget for each project, attached as Exhibit "B," shall constitute authorization of the expenditure described in the invoices provided that such expenditure is made in accordance with this Agreement. 2.2 Each invoice submitted by GRANTEE shall be itemized in sufficient detail for audit thereof and shall be supported by copies of corresponding vendor invoices and proof of receipt of goods or performance of the services invoiced. GRANTEE shall certify in writing that all subcontractors and vendors have been paid for work and materials from previous payments received prior to receipt of any further payments. COUNTY shall not pay GRANTEE until the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners pre -audits payment invoices in accordance with the law. [19-CZM-0026411634518l11 2 A Packet Pg. 109 8.A.2 2.3 GRANTEE shall be paid for its actual cost not to exceed the maximum amount budgeted pursuant to the attached Exhibit "B." 3. ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES. Only eligible expenditures described in Proposals will be paid by COUNTY. Any expenditures paid by COUNTY which are later deemed to be ineligible expenditures shall be repaid to COUNTY within thirty (30) days of COUNTY'S written request to repay said funds. COUNTY may request repayment of funds for a period of up to one (1) year after termination of this Agreement or any extension or renewal thereof. 4. PAYMENT REQUESTS. Payment requests for interim draws and final payment must be submitted to the County in the form of the Request for Funds form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit "C." All payments are on a reimbursement basis only after proof of paid invoices are presented to the County. County may withhold any interim draw for failure to provide the interim status report, and County shall withhold final payment until receipt of the final status report or other final report acceptable to County. All invoices and requests for payment including the final payment must be received within ninety (90) days of termination of this Agreement. Any invoices and requests for payment not received in this time frame shall be returned to the Grantee and rejected for payment. 5. INSURANCE. GRANTEE is required to submit a Certificate of Insurance naming Collier County, and its Board of County Commissioners and the Tourist Development Council as additionally insured. The insurance coverages identified in the Certificate of Insurance shall be maintained without interruption from the date of commencement of the Projects until the date of completion of all Projects required hereunder or as specified in this Agreement, whichever is longer. The Certificate of Insurance shall be issued by a company licensed in the State of [19-CZM-00264/1634518/ I J 3 Q C� Packet Pg. 110 8.A.2 Florida, with a current A.M. Best Financial rating of "Class VI" or higher, and provide General Liability Insurance for no less than the following amount: Bodily Injury Liability - $300,000 each claim per person Property Damage Liability - $300,000 each claim per person Personal Injury Liability - $300,000 each claim per person Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability — Statutory The Certificate of Insurance must be delivered to the County Manager, or his designee, within ten (10) days of execution of this Agreement by COUNTY. GRANTEE shall not commence activities which are to be funded pursuant to this Agreement until COUNTY has received the Certificate of Insurance. 6. CHOICE OF VENDORS AND FAIR DEALING. GRANTEE may select vendors or subcontractors to provide services as described in Proposal. COUNTY shall not be responsible for paying vendors and shall not be involved in the selection of subcontractors or vendors. GRANTEE agrees to disclose any relationship between GRANTEE and subcontractors and/or vendors, including, but not limited to, similar or related employees, agents, officers, directors and/or shareholders. COUNTY may, in its discretion, object to the reasonableness of the expenditures and require repayment if invoices have been paid under this Agreement for unreasonable expenditures. The reasonableness of the expenditures shall be based on industry standards. 7. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent permitted by law, GRANTEE shall hold harmless and defend COUNTY, and its agents and employees, from any and all suits and actions including attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the COUNTY by any employee of the [19-CZM-00264/1634518/1 1 4 CA(; Packet Pg. 111 8.A.2 named GRANTEE, any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed or authorized to perform work by any of them. 8. NOTICES. All notices from COUNTY to GRANTEE shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to GRANTEE at the following address: Chad Merritt, Interim Director Community Services Department City of Naples 280 Riverside Circle Naples, Florida 34102 cmerritt@naplesgov.com All notices from GRANTEE to COUNTY shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to COUNTY at the following address: Andrew Miller, Manager Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Andrew.Miller@collier-countyfl.gov GRANTEE and COUNTY may change their above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification pursuant to this section. 9. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as creating a partnership between COUNTY and GRANTEE, or its vendor or subcontractor, or to constitute GRANTEE, or its vendor or subcontractor, as an agent or employee of COUNTY. 10. TERMINATION. COUNTY or GRANTEE may cancel this Agreement with or without cause by giving thirty (30) days advance written notice of such termination pursuant to Section 8 and specifying the effective date of termination. If COUNTY terminates this Agreement, COUNTY will pay GRANTEE for all expenditures incurred, or contractual obligations incurred [19-CZM-00264/1634518/11 5 CA Packet Pg. 112 8.A.2 with subcontractors and vendors, by GRANTEE up to the effective date of the termination so long as such expenses are eligible. 11. GENERAL ACCOUNTING. GRANTEE is required to maintain complete and accurate accounting records and keep tourism tourist development tax funds in a separate checking account. All revenue related to the Agreement should be recorded, and all expenditures must be incurred within the terms of this Agreement. 12. AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS. GRANTEE shall maintain records, books, documents, papers and financial information pertaining to work performed under this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees that COUNTY, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to, and the right to examine and photocopy any pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of GRANTEE involving transactions related to this Agreement. 13. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: This Agreement is subject to the availability of Tourist Development Tax revenues. If for any reason tourist tax funds are not available to fund all or part of this Agreement, the COUNTY may upon written notice, at any time during the terms of this Agreement, and at its sole discretion, reduce or eliminate funding under this Agreement. 14. PROHIBITION OF ASSIGNMENT. GRANTEE shall not assign, convey, or transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of COUNTY. 15. TERM. This Agreement shall become effective on October 1, 2022 and shall remain effective until sixty (60) days after completion of the Project described in Exhibit "A", but no later than November 30, 2023. [19-CZM-00264/1634518/1 ] 6 CA0 Packet Pg. 113 8.A.2 16. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may only be amended in writing by mutual agreement of the parties and after recommendation by the Tourist Development Council if appropriate, i.e. pertaining to the expenditure of Tourist Development Tax. 17. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION. Any request for additional time to complete the Projects described herein, or any request for additional Tourist Development Tax funds must be made in writing and received by the County Manager or designee at least thirty (30) days prior to the end date of this Agreement as provided in Section 15, TERM. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTEE and COUNTY have each respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. IAA':. A'ii'EST: CRYSTAL Kinzel, Clerk -- ,�—, U De clerk 51 as to Chair p Approved as to form and le ity: olleen M. Greene Managing Assistant County Attorney ATTEST:.-��__; Appro3e4d- as•tq:TQTMx d. legal sufficiency: A/ , City"Attorney [19-CZM-00264/163451 8/1 J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA C' By- WilY6 L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman (corporate seal) CITY OF NAPLES V4&— Teresa Heitmann, Mayor T`1 CAV Packet Pg. 114 8.A.2 EXHIBIT "B" BUDGET — CITY OF NAPLES Naples Pier Repair and Maintenance Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Staff Salaries AGGREGATE TOTAL $200,000.00 $197,000.00 $397,000.00 [19-CZM-00264/163451811 1 ICAO Packet Pg. 115 Book 148 P Agenda Item7.A Meeting of 6/15122 RESOLUTION 2022-14857 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2022-2023 TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE CITY OF NAPLES CATEGORY "A" CITY OF NAPLES PROJECTS; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has identified needs and submitted two grant applications to the Collier County Tourist Development Council (TDC) to support activities related to the City Beach and Pier cleaning and maintenance; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Tourist Development Council (TDC) recommends to the Collier County Board of Commissioners to award grant funding to the City under its TDC Category "A" program to support City Beach and Pier cleaning and maintenance in the aggregate amount of $397,000; and WHEREAS, the funding does not require local matching funds and the acceptance of such funding will have no adverse impact on present or future operational needs; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Naples to accept the Collier County Tourist Development Council (TDC) grant funding; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the Agreement between Collier County and the City of Naples for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Category "A" City of Naples Beach cleaning and maintenance is hereby approved together with any related documentation. Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the 2022-2023 Tourist Development Tax Grant Agreement, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED IN OPEN AND REGULAR SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, THIS 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2022. a rldi L. Ro G+', C Apprmedas,#a'ari negality: A Nancy A. Stuparich, City Attorney j/� f-i�1► . Date filed with City Clerk: Teresa Lee Heitmann, ayor Packet Pg. 116 8.A.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the FY 2022-2023 10-Year Capital Planning document for Fund 195 Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance and Fund 185 Program Management and Administration and make a finding that these expenditures promote tourism. OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval for the annually updated 10-year capital planning document for the County's beach and inlet management program. CONSIDERATIONS: A 10-year capital planning document has been developed by Collier County staff to identify and balance long-term capital requirements/expenses and revenues received from the tourist development tax Fund 195 for beach renourishment and pass maintenance. This document is strictly used for planning. All grant requests and expenditure requests will be reviewed and approved by the Coastal Advisory Committee, the Tourist Development Council, and the Board of County Commissioners. Additionally, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Local Government Funding Request (LGFR) program requires that a 10-year planning document be utilized and approved for all municipalities seeking cost -share funding for Beach Management projects. Approval of this document for planning purposes satisfies the intent of this program. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact for this action. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS: this item unanimously at the June 27, 2022, meeting this item at its meeting on September 8, 2022. The Tourist Development Council (TDC) approved The Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) will review LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. — CMG RECOMMENDATION: To approve the FY 2022-2023 10-Year Capital Planning document for Fund 195 Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance and Fund 185 Program Management and Administration and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared By: Andrew Miller, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division Packet Pg. 117 (ZZOZ 18 jagwaldag aall!wwoo AjOSInpy JelseoD : L6£EZ) lalloed epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :luawyoelly 8.A.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Resolution supporting the County's applications to Florida Department of Environmental Protection for Long Range Budget Plan Requests for Beach Renourishment Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 and make a finding that these projects promote tourism. This action maintains the County's eligibility for State Cost Share Funding for future renourishment projects. OBJECTIVE: To approve a Resolution supporting the County's applications to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for Long Range budget Plan Requests for Fiscal Year 2023/2024. CONSIDERATIONS: Coastal Zone Management continues to seek funding from FDEP to augment existing tourist taxes that have been budgeted for these projects. These requests, if approved by FDEP, will provide partial funding for Collier County projects as listed below: Collier County Beach Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. b. FY 2023/2024 Beach Renourishment Design for Park Shore and Clam Pass Park 2. Marco Island Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. Wiggins Pass Dredging a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring and Tilling Approval of this Resolution is required as a condition of submittal to request long range State funding to renourish Collier County beaches and Inlet Monitoring. FISCAL IMPACT: Tourist Development Tax funds are currently available and budgeted in Beach Renourishment Fund 195 to accomplish this work. State approval will lead to future state cost share participation on these projects through FDEP grant agreement and contract. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the growth management plan related to this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. — CMG ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Coastal Advisory Committee approved the Local Government Funding Request on March 10, 2022 (7-0 vote). The Tourist Development Council approved the Local Government Funding Request on March 28, 2022 (7-0 vote). The resolution will be presented to the Coastal Advisory Committee on September 8, 2022 and the Tourist Development Committee on September 26, 2022 for a follow-up report on the status of the LGFR funding request. Packet Pg. 119 8.A.2 RECOMMENDATION: To approve a Resolution supporting the County's applications to the FDEP for Long Range Budget Plan Requests for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 and make a finding that these projects promote tourism. Prepared By: Andrew Miller, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Packet Pg. 120 8.A.2 RESOLUTION NO.22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S "FLORIDA BEACH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2023/2024 FUNDING REQUESTS" TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR LONG RANGE FUNDING REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023/2024, AGREEING TO SERVE AS THE LOCAL SPONSOR, SUPPORT PROPOSED PROJECT ACTIVITIES, AND COMMITMENT TO PROVIDING THE REQUIRED LOCAL COST SHARE. WHEREAS, Collier County's Coastal Zone Management, acting on behalf of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, has prepared Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Requests to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for long range grant funding for Fiscal Years 2023 /2024; and WHEREAS, the funding requests are to fund the following three Collier County Projects: 1. Collier County Beach Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. b. FY 2023/2024 Beach Renourishment Design for Park Shore and Clam Pass Park 2. Marco Island Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. 3. Wiggins Pass Dredging a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring and Tilling 1 Packet Pg. 121 8.A.2 WHEREAS, the timely maintenance and restoration of these high quality and readily accessible public recreational beaches is critical to preserve their value and viability, and to provide a boost to both the environment and the economy of Collier County tourism, including hotels, restaurants and related commercial activities; and WHEREAS, the role of the County government in maintaining and restoring beaches is appropriate and crucial; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners supports these three funding requests and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request for Fiscal Years 2023/2024; and and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to serve as the Local Sponsor; WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is able and committed to providing the required Local Cost Share; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to support proposed project activities; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners supports funding contained in previously approved funding contracts, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has enacted the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended, which commits funding to beach renourishment, beach maintenance, and beach park facilities. 2 Packet Pg. 122 8.A.2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The Board supports the Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Reques prepared for submittal to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for long range funding fc Fiscal Years 2023/2024, and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request; 2. The Board of County Commissioners is willing to serve as the Local Sponsor and suppo the maintenance and renourishment projects. The Collier County's Coastal Zone Management has the sta dedicated to provide Project Management and Administrative support; and, 3. The Board of County Commissioners is committed to providing the required Local Co Share. The required funds have been committed through the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 9, 60, as amended. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote favoring same this day of September, 2022. DATE: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK As Deputy Clerk By: William L. McDaniel, Jr., CHAIRMAN A owed as to form and legality: Colleen M. Greene Managing Assistant County Attorney Packet Pg. 123 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION 8.A.2 Local Sponsor Collier County - Growth Management Department - Coastal Zone Management Federal ID Number (FEID) 59-60000558 Primary Contact Name Andrew Miller Title Manager Mailing Address Line 1 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Mailing Address Line 2 City [Naples Zip Code 34104 Telephone Number (239)-252-2922, c (239) Email Address Andrew.Miller@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Contact Information PART II: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that all information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Local Sponsor Electronic or scanned signatures accepted. Printed Name Andrew Miller Date Packet Pg. 124 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. Project Name: (as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan) lier County Beach Renourishment 2. Project Description: Include county, location with reference to DEP range monuments, brief project history, and description of proposed activities. The project includes the periodic nourishment and monitoring of the Collier County beaches (Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples), maintenance dredging of Doctors Pass as a sand source for Naples Beach and erosion control structures adjacent to Doctors Pass f( sand retention. The project area is located between Florida FDEP reference monuments R-22+300 and R-79, and includes three "reaches": Vanderbilt Beach, Park Shore, and Naples. Pelican Bay will be constructed by the County on a reimbursable basis and is not considered as part of the project area. Vegetation will be planned for select locations in the project area, and plans will be developed as needed. Dune growth will be encouraged through planting and maintaining dune vegetation. Dunes will be restore( to pre -storm conditions when damaged. A 2017 permit modification was approved by FDEP for the Park Shore segment (FDEP Permit 0331817-001-JC) to extend the northern reach limit from R-43+500 to R-42 in order to incorporate the Clam Pass Park disposal area that is permitted under the Cla U Pass maintenance dredging permits into the County's beach nourishment program. Between 2017 and 2020 approximately 38,000 a cubic material was placed from Clam Pass onto the beaches on either side of the inlet and an additional 20,000 cy was placed by truck haul in the newly permitted segment. Clam Pass Beach was regraded on both the north and south side in April and Decembe 2020. The beach on the south side of the pass was nourished as part of the 2019 Park Shore Nourishment Project. a U Park Shore Beach was nourished with approximately 130,000 cubic yards of sand as part of the 2019 truck -haul project. v Naples Beach, not nourished as part of the 2016 or 2019 truck haul projects, received approximately 30,000 cubic yards of sand N dredged from Doctors Pass in 2018 placed in the nearshore. The majority of the sand was placed near Lowdermilk Park and the c balance placed near the south jetty at Doctors Pass. The reach from the Doctors Pass south jetty to R-60 was nourished with sand it CD c late 2020. CD Currently, the permit design is to maintain a 100 ft. wide beach in Vanderbilt and Naples Beaches and an 85 ft. wide beach in Park z Shore, with a 6-year project design life. The beaches have been nourished in 2005/2006 with an offshore sand source and from an 5 upland sand source using truck haul methods in 2013, 2014, 2016, 2019 and 2020. Q The County dredged Doctors Pass in spring 2018 and placed 18,200 cubic yards of sand within the nearshore disposal areas on Naples Beach. A total of 105,000 tons (70,000 cy) was placed on Naples south of R-60+800 in November 2021. Packet Pg. 125 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 3. Use of Requested Program Funds: Provide a brief description of tasks to be completed in each requested phase (Feasibility, Design, Construction, Monitoring, or USACE Multiphase). Indicate which tasks are cost reimbursement from previous fiscal years. 4. Map: Provide as an attachment. The map(s) of the project area must be formatted at a minimum of 1" = 200' scale and include a compass rose and legend. Map elements must include: M 1. Project boundary: DEP reference monuments and shoreline designated as critically eroded 2. Eligibility: Indicate lengths of eligible shoreline based on criteria outlined in Chapter 6213-36.007, F.A.C. a. Beach access locations: indicate primary or secondary access, and include the shoreline length, number and location of auto parking spaces, mass transit stops, bike parking spaces, and public restroom facilities within 1 /4 mile walking distance d of each access b. Public lodging establishments: include the length fronting the project shoreline, and include the length of street -side frontage for lodging within 1 /4 mile walking distance of a secondary beach access location Q 3. Recreational benefits: Comprehensive list of current land use designations of properties fronting the project shoreline V 4. Value of upland property: Include one -quarter mile buffer and provide a comprehensive list of the values of properties v (data from ,year 2021) that are enclosed or intersected by the buffer. The 2021 property value tax roll data and ArcGIS , shapefiles can be obtained from the Department of Revenue website: https:Hfloridarevenue.com/property/Pages/ N DataPortal RequestAssessmentRolIGISData.aspx. See Guidance Document for more information. c The total Just Values for project areas areas follows: Vanderbilt - $2,481,547,514 Naples- $5,263,216,953 Park Shore - $5,657,649,160 C These values do not include JV's for GIs identified gaps in the ECL data along the project shorelines. 5. Project length: Total restored project length (in feet) of the critically eroded area R-22+300 to R-30.5=14,996 ft, R-42 to R-54 E (as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan). +400=12,976 ft, Doctors Pass to R-79=19,340 r Q Packet Pg. 126 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 6. Eligibility: Required for all beach projects pursuant to Chapter 6213-36.007, F.A.C. Provide as a separate attachment, if needed. • Location/Access Name: Use the official name of the park or road that is associated with the public access. • DEP Reference Monument: Use the DEP monument that is closest to the main public access location. N • Type of Access: Indicate Primary or Secondary beach access in accordance with the definitions in Chapter 6213-36, F.A.C. N • Width of Access/Frontage: The length of the legal boundary (in feet) of the public access or lodging along the beach project shoreline. For public lodging establishments that do not front the beach, indicate the street -side length of the legal property boundary (in feet) that is used as the main access to the establishment. • Number of Eligible Units: A unit is defined as one automobile parking space, one rental unit in a public lodging establishment, o m mass transit stop, or four bicycle parking spots. • Additional Width from Eligible Units: Total distance (feet) added to the Width of Access/Frontage. If there are multiple types of eligibility units used for this calculation, show the calculation separately for each. • Total Eligible Shoreline: Sum of the Width of Access/Frontage and Additional Width from Eligible Units columns. Eligible shorelir 'E cannot overlap. E • Website Link for DBPR License: Provide the link to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) website for �j proof of licensure for any public lodging establishments used for eligibility or the Recreational Benefits ranking criteria. �+ 0 Location/ DEP Reference Type of Access Width of Access/ Number of Additional Width from Total Eligible Website Lin -0 Q for DBPR Access Name Monument Frontage (ft) Eligible Units g Eligible Units Shoreline (ft) License y See Attached 0 v r, r M M N d Y V fC d f� C d 07 a U Q U N N W O CD O a: C N E t V fC a+ Q Packet Pg. 127 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 7. Schedule and Budget: Provide as a separate attachment, if needed. Clearly indicate project phase: Feasibility (F), Design (D), Construction (C), Monitoring (M), or USACE Multiphase (USACE). Include the year of post -construction monitoring in the descriptior N • Cost Reimbursement: Specify eligible costs incurred during the three years prior to the current application's fiscal year that are N not in a current DEP agreement and have not been reimbursed (this includes fiscal years 20/21, 21 /22, and 22/23). Eligible cost - will be added to the current funding request. • Current and Future Costs: Specify eligible costs for the current application's fiscal year that are not in a current DEP agreement E and have not been reimbursed as well as the estimated costs for the next 4 years. Note: If Construction costs are requested in tl Q. current fiscal year, then the Year 1 Post -Construction Monitoring costs will be added to the current funding request. N m Fiscal Project Phase Description Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost a� Total Cost Year E E 0 20/21 See Attached U 0 20/21 y Q 20/21 N 0 U 21 /22 r� r M M 21 /22 d Y 21 /22 M d C 22/23 d Q U 22/23 Q U N N 22/23 00 0 ai 0 23/24 a� E t 23/24 cva r Q 23/24 24/25 24/25 24/25 Packet Pg. 128 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application Fiscal Year Project Phase Description Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost Total Cost 25/26 25/26 25/26 26/27 26/27 26/27 27/28 27/28 27/28 8. Tourism -related impacts: Criteria is calculated by the Department using 2021 data. For reference, tax data can be obtained fron the Department of Revenue website: https://floridarevenue.com/taxes/pages/colts from 7 2003.aspx. See Guidance Docume for more information. C, Current funding request includes construction and year one post -construction monitoring C, Project is managed by two or more counties Additional comments Local Option Sales Tax Collection July 2020 through May 2021 = $82,690,624 Tourist Development Tax July 2020 through Jan 2021 = $10,364,311 (incomplete data on website) Line 39 of Form 10 June 2020 through end of May 2021 = $49,797,493 9. Federal involvement: The documentation to verify authorization, federal cost share percentage, and status of funding award must be provided with the application materials for the award of points. Is the project Federally authorized by the USACE? No Authorization Year: Expiration Year: Does this project have a signed USACE Chief's report or Civil Works Congressional authorization for the No requested phase? m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N 00 0 CD 0 r_ W E t U 2 r Q USACE federal cost share percentage for this project (excluding FCCE): Packet Pg. 129 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application Select all that apply for the requested project phase(s) and include documentation with application materials. C Executed USACE project agreement C Included in USACE work plan C Approved FEMA Project Worksheet C Included in Congressional Appropriations Act C Other documentation: 10. Storm damage reduction benefits: Criteria is calculated by the Department. What is the volume (cy) of advanced nourishment lost since the last sand placement event of _2 880 CY (N. Park Shore) a beach restoration or nourishment project as measured above the Mean High Water -6,330 CY (Park Shore) contour? Data should be consistent with the annual post -construction monitoring reports. For restoration projects, what is the historical erosion rate? 0.61 foot/year 11. Cost effectiveness: Criteria is calculated by the Department. A project design analysis and supporting documentation must be provided with the application materials for the award of points. See Guidance Document for more information. What is the proposed sand placement volume (cy)? What is the nourishment interval (years)? Select all that apply for the current project funding request: 165,000 CY 5 C Enhanced longevity: Propose structural or design components that could extend the beach nourishment interval C Dune addition: Incorporate new or enhanced dune structures or new or existing dune restoration and revegetation projects (' Innovative technology: Propose innovative technologies designed to reduce project costs C Regionalization: Two or more local sponsors manage projects together or projects propose regional sediment management strategies to conserve sand resources or reduce project costs Additional comments for storm damage reduction benefits and cost effectiveness m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 12. Previous state commitment Has the Department previously reviewed, approved, and cost -shared on a feasibility or design phase for this project? Yes Has the current proposed project phase(s) received a partial state appropriation within 3 years of phase completion? No Additional comments 13. Accessible beach area: Criteria is calculated by the Department. Provide additional information for consideration. Describe the landward and seaward edge of the accessible beach width Provide the project boundaries (R-monuments) Provide citations of reference sources 14. Recreational benefits: Provide the percentage of linear footage within the project boundaries which is zoned recreational or open space; for commercial use; or to allow for public lodging establishment, or the equivalent. Provide additional documentation and DBPR website link in a separate attachment, if needed. 8.A.2 Park Shore: Using the 2014 MHW the beach area was calculated to be 370,532 sq. ft. However, in some areas the ECL is front of the MHW. • Vanderbilt: R-22+300 to R-30.5 = 14,996 feet • Park Shore: R-42 to R-54+400 = 12,976 feet • Naples: Doctors Pass to R-79 = 19,340 feet p Collier County, Florida Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan for Permits Collier County Beach Nourishment Project (FDEP Permit No. 033187-004- JM) and Wiggins Pass Navigation Channel Expansion and Maintenance Prniart (FnFP Permit fVn ir) 0 15. Mitigation of inlet effects: Criteria is calculated by the Department. Additional comments 16. Successive unfunded requests Is the current proposed project phase(s) a successive, unfunded request? If so, how many years of successive request(s) is the current application? Does the successive request add the construction phase? No Packet Pg. 131 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 17. Environmental habitat enhancement: Criteria is calculated by the Department. See Guidance Document for more informatioi Is the project within a designated critical habitat area for threatened or endangered species that is subject No to extensive shoreline armoring? Is the project within a non -designated area where extensive shoreline armoring threatens the habitat of No threatened or endangered species? If yes to either of the above, does the project exceed best management practices to incorporate turtle - friendly designs and management strategies to protect resources or benefit critical habitat preservation? Provide an explanation and supporting documentation for the strategies which exceed best management practices 18. Readiness to construct Does the project have an active state permit? Yes Permit number 0331817-001-JC Authorization date Expiration date Oct. 2, 2015 Oct. 2, 2030 Does the project have an active federal permit? Yes Permit number FSAJ-2003-12405 Authorization date April 6, 2016 Expiration date April 6, 2031 Have all necesssary easements been acquired for the upcoming or proposed construction phase? Yes Has the necessary local funding been secured for the proposed project? If so, provide a copy of the Yes draft Resolution. The signed Resolution is due by October 5, 2022. Is an Erosion Control Line established along the project length? Additional comments for readiness to construct Yes m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 r_ W E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 132 1 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application Provide additional information and comments below or attach supporting documents. Packet Pg. 133 1 (ZZOZ 18 a0qua0;deS 0011!W O:D AJOSIApd Ie}seoo : LMZ) 10310ed epu06V WO - ZZ-90.60 :}uGwt4oe;;d N Q 06 (ZZOZ 18 aagwoldeS OO;;iu WOE AJOsinp)y Ie;seOo : L4££Z) 10313ed epua6V WO - ZZ-90.60 :}uowt4oe;;d Ln Q Ln N• Ln M1• V) fn- ao (A� � ca �a a Co a) N U- — a)Q) ci U = m CO 0 ^ ++ Y V 0 00 0 0 0 M � L.� L m Ln a c a 00 aJ LD v rn N _U m U_ LLJ U_ 00 J = N J Co a E n EL�U-i E Ou Ou Ln Ov U LU N Q N 00 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q N ro Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q N U z r- Z z Z z Z z Z z z z z z Z z VL Lu Z z Z z Z z z z z Z z z z z z z c U c 00 C Ll Y O CJ N CuN LJ_ U U U -i U rl J — — — cu L.i) M -1 ro r, LU-0 rn LJ_ 'i fV -0 y O Ln O lD O l0 3 c-_ LL = 't � -' E E Ln LU Ln 3 3 3 06 06 Ln Y W CL N O W O O O O O O O O O O O O fu O O O O O O � O O O O � bl) ID N N m lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD M N lD lD lD lD lD lD ^� M V lD lD lD lD ") w ai L O O O s CL Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q CL C O Y O 00 (6 O O O f6 c6 f6 c6 O O O O O O O O O (6 m 2 2 " c6 O O C O f6 (6 m O O O O V NC O N N n lD N N UJ N Co Z Z Z Z Z lD n N UJ N m N lD LD N M w N Z Z Co CD -M lfl M lD G 'O Lf1 > fy > > > > nj > > > > > Ln > > OA "O - O O O O O O O O O O O O v a 3 N W N d CL m V Z _ Y LO O r-i1ry O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O N O O O O N ti O O O O N N p Ln Ln� � m .� " N O Y 0 � C N OA to Y 0 O � O Y LL � NN M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'a \ N O) Q) lD lD lD LD lD lD lD LD lD LD lD LD lD lD cy lD lD lD l0 lD LD lD LD lD LD lD LD lD LD lD l0 3 " v u V Q w O N (0 f6 (0 f6 (0 f6 (0 f6 [6 f6 (0 f6 (0 f6 (0 /6 i f6 (0 f6 (6 f6 (0 f6 (0 N bA bA bA Q- -0 7 -O C: C C C C C C C C C C C C C -O C C C C C C C C: C C C C C C: C U 7 O D_ O O U N O V N O U w O V N O U w O V N O U w O V N O U w O V N O U w O V N O U w O u N 7 D_ O J O U w O V N O U w O V N O U w O V N O U w .� O_ O U N O V N O U w O V N O U w O V N O U w O u N Vl V) Vl V1 V) V1 V) VJ V) V1 V) V1 V) V) V) V1 V) V1 V) V1 V) V) V) V) V7 V) V7 Vl V1 C Ol Ol rl M Ln V Un Ln lD V) n Ln W Lf) Lf) O Ln L.f) N L.f) M Lf) � Lf) V) L.() Lf1 Ln Ln Lq O L!) l0 lD CO lD � l0 lD lD n lD W lD 'D n O r, n r-I n ^ N ^ ^ r ^ V) r, ^ to ^ n W o0 C O K 0: lD C" lfl D: lD cC lD C lD C lD w C I� L r, n n rY n n n n n n n CL CL cr C oC oC C C w 1= C cr CC U/ T O O Y " Q E f0 L U O_ O O 0 (D Z > Q Z Z Z Z Z > V) V) V1 VI V1 VI V1 VI V1 V) Vl U1 Vl V) Vl V) Vl V) Vl Vl (6 U1 N N Q N 2 N U1 > Q w N w N UJ N (V L \ C m _ N > > Y t6 > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > U N > > > > > Q > Q U > Q > Q > Q > Q > Q > Q > Q - > Q Z Q J Q Q Q Q Q i ++ Q Q Q Q Q W Q Q Q Q f6 t VI « f0 0 > r, �'' lD 4 i" � U/ �"� fV m � U) N -Co r, 00 O) O �--I N M Lf) lD I� W > V 3 O Q O m N U O ci c-I 00 ci c-I c-I ci c-I ci c-I Q rj N J v J s z = s ao CO 01 W LU (ZZOZ 18 jegLueldes OOIIIW OO tiosinpV JBISBOO : LMZ) 10100d epu06V OVO - ZZ-90.60 :IuGwt43Bl)v y O O O 0 O 0 p 0 O O p O 0 O O O Op O O O y FWUs��`ss'Go�l-�� c o o p 0 p 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 v, 0 o M V'1 O O 00 kn M �t `p ,� kn N kn p d\ \O V rnW 69 cl n ab9 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 CO i O C> O CD p O O O O O p O U o 00 _ 69 b9 69 69 b9 69 69 69 69 O U i O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9s Qq sus Qq srn C�3 ct R •v� y O .� v O U y .� cd a '� O P. '� bq t4 bq bA bA bA bA to to to r v cu A Z A Q.) cn U 'A Q> C/] •y O O O V] V] a O V] V] V] V1 cd O cd ct m Pr cd U 'O cl -O cl O cd P, A to m N ,� to cd .V-I bA U bA to A to �•, bi) cd bb U bb O 9b p P1 CG •i, P� y CQ p Ga al A pa 7U-r Cq y Cq o Cq A � Z O by � O U cd —L, � m cd � O � U cd .� cad •m Cd •v' m p•m N �' y i.w y rn W S-I �r cd Py O O xy O U O CdLt cd A z V U sl W P� ct da Qt O O O tZ O O to to O ,tOj U 9b U U 9b O O O O O O O U U U u U U a ,It cn 1.0 r 00 O1 O N M N N N N N N M M M M Cd N N N N N N N N rq N N N N N N pM M O O O O O N O N O O M O O N N N N N N N N N N 8.A.2 RESOLUTION NO.22 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S "FLORIDA BEACH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2023/2024 FUNDING REQUESTS" TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR LONG RANGE FUNDING REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023/2024, AGREEING TO SERVE AS THE LOCAL SPONSOR, SUPPORT PROPOSED PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND COMMITMENT TO PROVIDING THE REQUIRED LOCAL COST SHARE. WHEREAS, Collier County's Coastal Zone Management, acting on behalf of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, has prepared Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Requests to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for long range grant funding for Fiscal Years 2023 /2024; and WHEREAS, the funding requests are to fund the following three Collier County Projects: 1. Collier County Beach Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. b. FY 2023/2024 Beach Renourishment Design for Park Shore and Clam Pass Park 2. Marco Island Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle 1 Packet Pg. 137 8.A.2 Monitoring and Tilling. Wiggins Pass Dredging a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring and Tilling 2 Packet Pg. 138 8.A.2 WHEREAS, the timely maintenance and restoration of these high quality and readily accessible public recreational beaches is critical to preserve their value and viability, and to provide a boost to both the environment and the economy of Collier County tourism, including hotels, restaurants and related commercial activities; and WHEREAS , the role of the County government in maintaining and restoring beaches is appropriate and crucial; and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners supports these three funding requests and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request for Fiscal Years 2023/2024; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to serve as the Local Sponsor; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is able and committed to providing the required Local Cost Share; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to support proposed project activities; and WHEREAS: the Board of County Commissioners supports funding contained in previously approved funding contracts, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has enacted the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended, which commits funding to beach renourishment, beach maintenance and beach park facilities. 3 Packet Pg. 139 8.A.2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The Board supports the Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Requests prepared for submittal to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for long range funding for Fiscal Years 2023/2024, and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request; 2. The Board of County Commissioners is willing to serve as the Local Sponsor and support the maintenance and renourishment projects. The Collier County's Coastal Zone Management has the staff dedicated to provide Project Management and Administrative support; and, 3. The Board of County Commissioners is committed to providing the required Local Cost Share. The required funds have been committed through the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this _ day of , 2022. DATE: ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK As Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Penny Taylor, CHAIRMAN Colleen M. Greene Managing Assistant County Attorney 4 Packet Pg. 140 1 R (ZZOZ 18 jegwa;dag aa;llwWOO ti°slnpy le;seOD : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8mtj3B V I ' I ' I ' I I ' I ' I ' I � 1� c O N O ui LL _ c U N • s E j C uFu F IV I I 0 I 1 CL I y — f I d {J' 'Al ' I ig ORO- E > N c I c I J N I I II I I I m ti I E m � UJ V O E N O N w "O Oi i _ y T v j �U t o N p p� 7 0 N O O U am m c a�v� w �avm°Juvm `pE E—fir ° V L I H y N U V n U y U y Oo0 d0 cwp:5 � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Z ri N n'1 N a I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I (ZZOZ 18 jagwaldag aa;;lW WOO tioslnpy lelSeOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3ea V lu (M 41 13 �1 U- v C r u m C g L � 5�o� m U sMmP m V) U c tD 0 u Z U p J I E rn o w E� N 3w �'o `o o w v W " o E,v o o o w v o w n Z>. -a. m �uv j Y E o N o 0 dd O D cao'mca�iv�i a v m a, u v o E ErL ov w N > C mO m:5 m Z N ni 0 O f V (ZZOZ •8.lagwa;dag aa;;!ulWOO tiosinpy lelSeOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3ea V N a I x I i — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — E rnm o w E m � �� v_ 3w o `o wo u " o E •v E o w v�o, w v v s,_ 0 j Y m E O N o 0 0 D cao'mca'oiv�i 0avma�uv� a,E E� o ov n aUi N w > ate+ mmr., � Z N 0 0 f u (ZZOZ 19 jegwa;dag aa;;iwWOD tiOSIAPV lejSeoo : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3eaay v i -FIR M f • t + •s CA �. LL 1 (U u M I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O U I X I C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ZZOZ 'S jegwa;dag aa;;iww0D tiOs!npy Je3seoO : L6££6 4ON3ed epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :auawg3e;;y IL L v y �rr- LL a � g m V (B Cameo I' I (3) 0) 112,E O V) f f a a, (n $ o fu z m y I U U I t I I o o u_ I � I O I � I v I a _ I C of o w Y r` U w M 4. -ffi E U 0 a�11 ��. J� a a U- C_ I,C J L _------------- IL fa 1Z 2 o I � I m� u v 03 I a u T I I ,u o > > I I I I N a a aoo I I � v o. I o I T .� E > u ui 1B m I 9 a s in F I C m 'o I I I J N I I --Z E I rn 2 v E u� " I m m w Lu 1.3 ' ELF u rn� oN -EE n� • i I > N 30 Ci$ j N 4-0 O U i _ o v° w o0 � am m e a�iv�i x I am_v E�°'m C7 iil v N u u n U N mi O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Z .-+ N t•'1 (ZZOZ 18 jagwaldag aa;;iwWOO tiOSIAPV le;seOo : L6££Z) 4ON3ed epua6y OVO ZZ'80'60 luawgoeaay N � Q �T � - - - - ' ' - - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - �� R 14 _rn u a. I � U a--+ I � Ol���^ o W U') f 0 i fp Q > 41 QU O� M x I O u Z m U p I IOL N zz I _ 1 I le a I v I � a ? c O I o LU V I (El. a rn m E M ; M LL w w N N w U yp. cjl 1 n ® J 1 O c N — I u v co _ O I I a J I o 0 1 N a 1- I I 1 I 1 I I 1 E I I o LT I I o E > m I - m inm E C o, I c G1 c JN I I I I I I I v (U} o E m � J� I v op m EON 0O00 0 �% C a N C N U N •i� 1 O m E N N V C7f I ul �y°juun�U`y N Z N r (ZZOZ 18 jagwaldag aa;;iwWOO tiosinpy Ie;seOD : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :au8wg3ea V V — IM I17L N t I.0 IL IIE 17 I57 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O U K I I C7 i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I - - - - - - - - - i L � m U sMm� 0 u Z U p J I h, v E rn o w E' m � N o `o o w V " o E,v E 1° vry a o w o, O j Y m E E O N 0 o O D cao'mca�iv�i a v m E u v `o,E E�rL ov ii1 u vv av `w a r A Y O�OCO Z N n'1 (ZZOZ •8 jagwa;da8 aallll WOO AJoslnpy le3seoO : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3ea V f•n 4%1 .'I 0. t 1 I D I pi I I1 IN IC IV Ifu I� I I I � � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O u K I I (7 ---------------------------------- v E rn � w v E m � o `o o o Lu E•v E +° vN o a, U v �_ Z� m uciYm� O N 0 0 0 0 a ao' p m v m E u v 10 `o,E E�ItI10 ov a ommodom£� Z N n (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;dag aa;;lwwoo AjOSInpy JejSeoo : L6££Z) lalloed epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :auawgoea V O U I X I (D i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c g L � v u m U aLLM° ro F= ) 0) � v V) Uru N 0 u Z U J I w a 0 0 w V U w m E m c u° f 0 0 I , a o V N w a L 'E > n ii E � m C o d- n f y c o � N J N E O y E O 10 � o `O O W U N O t E° E '°mu 0 o 2 v 2 o w U v v �_ Z ,.n v 'c U v O E N 3 O O O V O ca°'mca�iv�i c a v m u v `o E E�r L ov uvvuunM v`w w > ate+ co Co � Z N M 0 0 f u (ZZOZ 18 jagwaldag aalliwwoo AjOSInpy Jelseoo : L6££Z) lalloed epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :luawgoelly M 7 V I 71 �I lL r- vl uVI � I � I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ I ID 0_1 ILL I a) IC IL IJE I � 1� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o I k I I ---------------------------------- I L � v m U z V) f U c' `� 8 a� ra a > O U z m' UJ ,o 4 o a O O w lk E rn 2 v E m � �, � v_ 3 w �'o `o o Ln W U N O t Ev p °vo 0 o v�o, w V v Q y Z� v 'c c U v O >, Y m E N 3 E p O O V O o ca°'mca�iv�i m E u v a,E E�rL ov iil ��uun� v`> w > O ccd O cc i Z N n', a Y A a (ZZOZ •8 jagwa;da8 8033!WWOO AJosinpy Ie;seOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3ea V ls I a 'r m , n ® Z v a c O O uj Uc w m E H � m c O U f a a_ LU LU I , u a ti N W a �T L 'E > n Li E 2 ti C o n f y c of o J N E m � `o o Lu U N O t E ° E 0 o w v o In .� Z� -am �uv > Y m d 1�0 �-> N 3 o E o O O n 00 cao'mca�iv�i 2 o v m E u v o E E-rL ov ill u vvi u u n U N w v > O m d O M i Z N n'1 Mil I1 (ZZOZ l8 jagwaldag aa;;lwWOO tioslnpy Ie;seOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :au8wg3ea V _ '• 7 � •.� 70 Y I M.. O O U !t X O i N r a v m rn A � S L a L � v P m m E a8�^ Cm a) 6 11 NE z w V) f U c `n 8 Q1 >✓ (D Q > O U Z m' UJ ,N �o v E O y E O 0 �Z, � 3w �'o `oLn o w U " o E° E 0 ZL N m� E O N 0 0 0 D cao'mca-W a v m w u v `o E E—It ov u u n U N w v >• O m d 0 ME Z N ni (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;da8 aa33iwwoo AjOSInpy le;seoo : LMZ) ;aAoed epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :auawyoea V E o, r, a N Y J U rn C= �? i d L � C m U s dLLM o C m w�� z (v V) f U0)`� 8 a� a > O U z m' UJ ,N 4N o a 0 O w V U E m E c 0 u° f a a 0 0 I � a N W a m a� oLn E —> L � � Y w c � C c, n f y c of o` J N v E rn o w E m �s m v_ 3w �'o `o o w U " o 2-54- �cFua` O >, Y m E o N 00 O O D e tic, m e N U 4 a v m w u v B � o a,E Eov n U N w > v C m � 8 d O m.5 � (ZZOZ '8 aagwa;des aa;;iwWOO tiosinpy 1e3seoD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3eaay v N w O O U !t X (9 i a` c 0 0 w` m u V � m E c 0 u f 0 0 LL LL I , ai V 0_ N W 0 C N EO. O > > o E w LT c .. c CA JO N E rn 2 v E m � 3 v �'o `o O W U N O L N E EO wO w V Oi u a n Z.0 C C u a)-0 6 O j Y m E O N O O O D ca°'mca�iv�i c a v m u v `o,E E�r L ov uvvuunM v`w w > aO+ cc Co � O Z N n 0 0 V (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;dag aa;;iwWOO tiosinpy JejSeoo : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ'80.60 :auawy3ea V Lo N o _v w x (7 i Oil IM a ui y L M u m U s o T. 8 O U z m' U p J o a` c 0 0 w` m u u c m E O c 0 u f w w 0 0 I , M u `m o_ N W a C N o. O o E w LT c � y c o` J N v E O O y E 10 � o `o o o w u ^ o E N E `O d O, w u v Z s_ L C C u a)O j Y m -0 N 3 - ? (,up O O N O @ u 'o a v m v 5E ErL ov ii1 aOuvvuun� v`> v r m + m�m..�— O Z .-+ N n'1 (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;da8 8033il WOO tiosinpy le;seOD : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wy3ea V to N NI� a ui y I� I i I I I I I I O u 4-X 75 VI u O LL O g a Cho° m U fLL° M o ) o :3 (V F uo � $ 8 N f �G = Uu a O J , N 4N o y v E o y E� m � �'o `o o o w U ^ o E ° E 0 O w �O-0Oi w U V �_ r Z L -0 W Y m d m N 3 w E 0 0, o 0 -0 ao' c QO, v'o 5E ErL ov v O co-0 0 a m i 10 Z N n'1 N Q (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;dag aa;;lwwoo AjOSInpy JejSeoo : LM6 ;aAoed epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :auawyoeaay r- N --------------------------- I 1 I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I (ZZOZ 19 jegwaldag aa;;lwWOO tioslnpy le;seOo : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3eaay I � I I I I I I I I I I I . I _ I o u w 'x I 75 y I (D i 1 i I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C g � w= CC HE � f 8 N �c f = U u a O m J o y v E O O N E 10 N ; 3 w � 0' `o o w U " o E`v o +oaf) `O O w �O -0 a, w v v _ u A O j Y m E E O O 0 0 00 �aO1mca�iU� 2 a v m E u v A rnE E—It ov ill u vvi CM aUi N C m-88 a8 m :E A Z N M (ZZOZ 19 jegwa;dag aa33iwwoo AjOSInpy le;seoo : LMZ) ;aAoed epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :auawgoeaay N Q y v E O O O y E O 10 N � 0' `0 0 Ln w U w " o u Qj rn Z L C C u N O j Y m d O O 0 0 0 D ca°'mca�iv�i 0 a v m E u v 2 E ErL ov uvvcu�n� au> a0+ co cc � O Z .-+ N M (ZZOZ '8.lagwa;dag aa;;iwWOD tiOSIAPV JOISCOO : LM6 MOLd epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :auawg3eaay I � rn I I_ u � ly I I I I II I I I I I I , , , � I I I I I I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I � , I I I I I I I I O u w 'x 3 � I - - - (D f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I - - - - - - - - 0 v a` c 0 0 u` U c m E to � 0 c 0 u F a a u 0 u u u , v E O O N E 10 � 3 w � 0' `0 0 - Ln w U u ^ o E N EO '�-' N N O` O w -0 T w U -0 Qj 01 , '� Z ' C C U b mO (u 3 E 0 0 0 o 0 va01�Uv S a v m v `o r E E�L ov ill u n U > v O m-0 0 a m i 10 Z N n (ZZOZ r8.lagwa;dag aa;;iwWOO tiosinpy JOISCOO : LM6 PA39d epu86y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3ea V do �I I I I I •�' w C o u w 'x C C g w2 m E w SLLM o o � QJ (3) U c' $ 8 N V) �c f = U a J m 44\1 1 o N Q C 0 O W u U � N Y E 0 0 0 uo f 0- LU o u 0 � I c E a 0 �n > V � S v CD N C C N rn i c p� c N N J v E rn o v E m � w U ^ o E N EO N W m cao'mcwU�i 0 a v m E u v `o E E-rL ov iil uvvuun� aOv`> ma�m..,- v r + �� O Z .-+ N t.'1 (ZZOZ'8 jagwa;dag 80331wWOO tiosinpy Je3seoO : LM6 PA39d epu06V OVO - ZZ•80.60 :auawyaeaay N N f0 a o I I ui �3 g `T a Co I o♦ '��� V a C " m (M M 1 (3) f U c Q) �c f = U u a J m o (ZZOZ '8.lagwa;dag aa;;iwWOD tiosinpy JOISCOO : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :auawg3ea V 0 m Q 0 0 w m 1 v E rnm o w E m � ; � v_ 3 w �'o `o o w U " o E .v o ,m_, a) o w v -0 o, w U Q , y O j m m E Eo�oo�o a ca ycW a v m E u v m `o E E-rL ov ii1 uvvuun� v`> w > N a (ZZOZ 19 jegwa;dag aa;;iwWOO ti0slnpy le;se0o : L6££Z) 4ON3ed epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :au8wg3eaay v � I =1 u I m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I L- I Iv IJ I Ic 1= Iv I� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i O u I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w X 5 (D i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ v a` c 0 .N 0 w` U � w 7'n E J 01 c 0 a a U 0 w i I N n O E m 5 d f C C ut V a N r CDccm J y E rn m ° v C c v JO O O Ln w U ^ o E N EO '�-' N N `O O w T w U Zv m �uv V O j m m E m 0 E n c O N 0 0 0 D vaa'�camiv� �avmvu?�'�' `o E E-rL ov 1%1 U u u n N a r A ate+ cc a�m+J— (ZZOZ'8.lagwa;dag aa;;iwWOD tiosinpy JOISCOO : LM6 MOLd epua6y OVO - ZZ'80'60 :auawg3BjjV i IN Iv I� 1� ly I IV IA I� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l ALI ' O U .x 75 v a` 0 0 .N 0 w` u c m E 0 0 0 V F a a u 0 p w I E n 0 > > v LL E 2 c a in f C N V a N N r cm 40, co J v E O y E 10 � �'o `o o ou w u ^ o E N p N N `O T 2 D -am C C u N V O j Y m E m 0 E n c O N 0, 0 D vu� cavm�u?�'�' `5E E�rL ov uvvuun� v`> v aO+ m�m+Jr — O Z N M 0 0 V a m Y G a (ZZOZ'8 jagwa;da8 803311uwo'J AJoslnpy JOISCOO : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8mtj3B V to to N t IC� ,: IA I I I I I I IM Iv I� I� Iw Ic lu Im I� I I I I I I I I I I I . - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O u 4-X 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I - - - - - - - - bli v E rn o v E �s m m 'v_ 3w �o `o o -U w u ^ o E N EE '�-' N N O` O 4- m0 T V om j Y m E E c'c O N o 0 O D e a rn m c w u 4 a v m m u v `o E E-rL ov uvvuuI v`w m r m ate+ cc m ..� - Z N n'1 (ZZOZ I8 jagwa;dag aa;;iwWOO tiosinpy le;seOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :au8wy3ea V r` to ml a ui y I , I + I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I O U w 'x 3 � I I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ c 4 U d g � M CC m U C CD �2LLm CLnv � L9 O pi — U c $ o U N �-0p ' O U > U m' O J c o y E rn ° v E a0 m s v_ 3 o `o o w U " o Ev o :°a0N U ai rn 6 .� Z V c C U N om j co w m- 0 E g n c O N'o O O D cao+mcwU�i = a v m m u v m `o r E E-L ov uvvuun� v`> m r A mE>jaq _deS _;_JAjO mqJOIS mo&M z m39d ePUOBVino-m#e a8WIj3B m N _§ § iT ! k\e§ m � § U E� 2 k k \ u§> 0 . § [2 E E \ , �\ /) ) 0 \ d k as 22, }�.*(i(2 c ,') -E § (#�'o>,J= )\fatly$ !ea# eEE-It = ;fasem \ A c a cowo:6 2` R ¥ mE>jeq _©sue >_oAJO+PV _eOo&Mzm39d BPUOBVmo-m#ea_tj3B m \A \ � . , • /� — .\: 1" . , , � � � � �3 �| ! ]LL c _ 55 6 ® ) - \ ; { . CL :t cm . -® �§ \ \ , _ , ]0 ' U§d � E _ %F4 � �2 ol E . E , )\ . &§ ] k�. (ZZOZ'8 jagwa;dag 80331wwoO tioslnpy Ie;seOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wy3ea V I-, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .ui I w I I o� iL e� N Im I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I O U w 'K I � y I C7 g I I I y v E rn o w E m 3w � 0 `o o wU w Ego E ° EO N N wO �O d Oj U 1.3 to '� m W mud m N E w a v m E u ?� U oEE - rmov 1 -� vvi � u n � u v C cc -0 � a� m i 10 Z N n'1 (ZZOZ'8 jagwaldag aa;;iW WOD tiosinpy Je3seoO : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :au8wg3ea V ____ ________I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i O U w 'x I 3 y I I I I I j6, m c 4 UL � m U E ch f' g �2LLm rm U-) U c o " N � _ ' O U > U m' O J o y v E O y E m 3 w o `o o w U w ;; o E E + N N 2O w �O d T U v v o,- d � O HO O 3.3. 0 O R �ao'mca�iow U� 2 a v m E u v `5E EL ov U1 u vvi u u m U N an,v > O m A d 0 m i Z N ni U1 (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;dag 0044lwwoO tioslnpy ie;seOD : LMZ) ;aA3ed epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wy3ea V - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- "Me1 1 cl I I I I I [ • Uu «� d � I e. 1 I . • I � N j I I I � I UUNN � _ � I I - I a'= •� M I rn iL lu I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O U I w 'K I 3 y I I ---------------------------------I C u a c �mcn :3 +� U c Qi a� 0 u U > U p J E C f W v Q 0 o w` Q a Y a o v V1 U c Do rn ; m 0 0 0LU V u u y a 0 a a F w � cl I J � N lJ L•J 1' E rn o w E m �2� � 3w �'o `o o Ln W U N O, V O E ° EEo O j Y m E O N 00 0 0 0 cao'mca�iv�i 2 a v m r E u v a,E E�L ov ill u vvi u u n U N O In, O m i� Z N ti mE>jaq _deS _;_JAjO +qJOIS BO,<M6m3ed BPUOBVmo-m#e a8WIj3B m �. o/ mak- \� _§ � ! �j\\co � Ln § ƒ3�/ ( o � UE2 0 ; \J(1) U u - § (% E E , )\ k) ) 0 o k a 3 4— /±.*(f(3 m7�)i\f§ (#C)�>,00 \\army$ !@±# Jƒy{_=s= § faseR2%( ]2323a:5 0 R w (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;dag 80331wWOO ti0sinpy Je3se0O : LM6 ;aA3ed epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :IUawyaea V v r` I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------------------------------------------' I i � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I 9 I I m I I I _ � v-i u I lu Y mw";�Irl atllGIOZ I I I I .,I �I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I O U w 'x � � I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c U a c a`6i � m in ::3 (1) +� U c 0)�"a U U > U 0 J v E rn : v N C C v 00 O O w U w " o E p +� 0)N 0 0 v O j Y m E ca°'mca�iv�i a v m E u v 2EE—. ov uvvW6�n� aU> ate+ m-08a�m:5 �0 Z N M N a (ZZOZ '8.Iagwa;dag aa;;iwwoD ti0sinpy JOISCOO : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :auawg3ea V - -- - -- - ------ - - - - -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------, I I V I I /1 1 of 1 � I rn I IiL C C I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I • YL. ,/ C g 4 m u E m 0) Cm � < d 'T U c N a� -0 C .O U > U p J y y E m O y E ' 0 N 3w � 0' `0 0 w U w ^ o E N EO w O 4= a Z ,- C C U N Eo j rm, E �-> N 3 E o o o 0 0 �a01mca�iV'� a , m u v o m Eve m ov Vl Y Q) N 0 m d m i Z N n'1 Im IL v m rn 0 O f V 0 \ o mEijaq _deS _;_qAJO+q _eOo&Mzm39d ePUOBVino-m#e a8mtj3B m $� _§ § / ! mo m Ln vE� ; u k � k \ U§> 0 (2 E E , )\ k' ) 0 \ d k a - s 0 Y, *f(( .)E&§( ,#0 SO )\f2tly2 !ea# e[y{_�s= ;faseA)%( a ==a23a£a (ZZOZ l8 jagwa;dag aa;;iwWOO tiosinpy Ie;seOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3ea V o v w K C9 i C g m ch C m (n :3 U C: 0) 70 — — C U U > U p J v E O O y E 10 N �'o `o o wV w '; Co E ,v o 0 o w v�o, w U 43 Y, , = -=mv O j Y m E p aO p 00 ca yca� 2 a v m E u v `o E E— It ov uvvuun� v`> w > O Z .-+ N n'1 -+ a ui y j Y O U FL a 0 0 f u (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;dag 0044!W WOO tiosinpy le;seOD : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :au8wy3ea V t PR o v w .X c 'c 4C g g� m U C ch �2LLm r rm U-) U c o u N � -0' O U > U m' O J o v E c 0 f a W O y v E rn� ° w E� m � � 0' `o o Ln w V W ^ u o E N E a o w v-0o, Z� -am ` mu v V j Y E 1CD0 3 E o O o o p vaa'�ca�iV•o 2avmEuv'�' rnE Ercc -0L ov ill u vvi u u n� U N v r m Z N t.'1 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION 8.A.2 Local Sponsor Collier County - Growth Management Department - Coastal Zone Management Federal ID Number (FEID) 59-60000558 Primary Contact Name Andrew Miller Title Manager Mailing Address Line 1 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Mailing Address Line 2 City [Naples Zip Code 134104 Telephone Number (239)-252-2922, c (239) Email Address Andrew.Miller@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Contact Information PART II: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that all information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Local Sponsor MillerAndrew Date: 022.0ed 14:37: 8-04'00' g p Date: 2022.07.30 14:37:48-04'00' Electronic or scanned signatures accepted. Printed Name Andrew Miller Date Packet Pg. 179 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. Project Name: (as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan) h Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project 2. Project Description: Include county, location with reference to DEP range monuments, brief project history, and description of proposed activities. The South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline of Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments from reference monument R-144 to R-148+600 (G-4). This project ha! an approximate design beach width of 100 ft. from the baseline and is nourished on an approximate 6 to 7-year interval. The project's borrow area is the Caxambas Pass Borrow Area with upland sand mines permitted as supplemental sand sources. This project includes yearly physical beach monitoring, beach tilling, and environmental monitoring as required by FDEP and USA( permits. In 2013, Collier County placed approximately 77,800 cubic yards of beach compatible material to restore approximately 2,300 feet along South Marco Island (400 feet south of R-146 to G-4). The beach fill was within the 2005 permitted project limits. The main goi of the project were to restore storm protection, natural resource habitats, and recreational beach areas to offset the storm damage caused by Tropical Storm Fay in 2008. Additionally, the structural repair of five existing erosion control structures was completed it 2013/14. he South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project was then renourished through truck haul methods in November of 2016 witl pproximately 13,200 cubic yards of beach compatible material to offset storm damages caused by Tropical Storm Debby. 1010111 ately 80,000 cy of dredged material from Caxambas Pass was placed in the South Marco Island Beach project area in Mar( m U M a. c m a U Q U N N 00 0 ai 0 a� E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 180 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 3. Use of Requested Program Funds: Provide a brief description of tasks to be completed in each requested phase (Feasibility, Design, Construction, Monitoring, or USACE Multiphase). Indicate which tasks are cost reimbursement from previous fiscal years. 4. Map: Provide as an attachment. The map(s) of the project area must be formatted at a minimum of 1" = 200' scale and include a compass rose and legend. Map elements must include: M 1. Project boundary: DEP reference monuments and shoreline designated as critically eroded 2. Eligibility: Indicate lengths of eligible shoreline based on criteria outlined in Chapter 6213-36.007, F.A.C. a. Beach access locations: indicate primary or secondary access, and include the shoreline length, number and location of auto parking spaces, mass transit stops, bike parking spaces, and public restroom facilities within 1 /4 mile walking distance d of each access b. Public lodging establishments: include the length fronting the project shoreline, and include the length of street -side frontage for lodging within 1 /4 mile walking distance of a secondary beach access location Q 3. Recreational benefits: Comprehensive list of current land use designations of properties fronting the project shoreline V 4. Value of upland property: Include one -quarter mile buffer and provide a comprehensive list of the values of properties v (data from ,year 2021) that are enclosed or intersected by the buffer. The 2021 property value tax roll data and ArcGIS , shapefiles can be obtained from the Department of Revenue website: https:Hfloridarevenue.com/property/Pages/ N DataPortal RequestAssessmentRolIGISData.aspx. See Guidance Document for more information. c CD 0 5. Project length: Total restored project length (in feet) of the critically eroded area Permitted project from R144 to R 148+600 (G (as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan). 4730 ft. Critically eroded R 144 to R 148 4130f r Y Q Packet Pg. 181 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 6. Eligibility: Required for all beach projects pursuant to Chapter 6213-36.007, F.A.C. Provide as a separate attachment, if needed. • Location/Access Name: Use the official name of the park or road that is associated with the public access. • DEP Reference Monument: Use the DEP monument that is closest to the main public access location. N • Type of Access: Indicate Primary or Secondary beach access in accordance with the definitions in Chapter 6213-36, F.A.C. N • Width of Access/Frontage: The length of the legal boundary (in feet) of the public access or lodging along the beach project shoreline. For public lodging establishments that do not front the beach, indicate the street -side length of the legal property boundary (in feet) that is used as the main access to the establishment. • Number of Eligible Units: A unit is defined as one automobile parking space, one rental unit in a public lodging establishment, o m mass transit stop, or four bicycle parking spots. • Additional Width from Eligible Units: Total distance (feet) added to the Width of Access/Frontage. If there are multiple types of eligibility units used for this calculation, show the calculation separately for each. • Total Eligible Shoreline: Sum of the Width of Access/Frontage and Additional Width from Eligible Units columns. Eligible shorelir 'E cannot overlap. E • Website Link for DBPR License: Provide the link to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) website for �j proof of licensure for any public lodging establishments used for eligibility or the Recreational Benefits ranking criteria. �+ 0 Location/ DEP Reference Type of Access Width of Access/ Number of Additional Width from Total Eligible Website Lin -0 Q for DBPR Access Name Monument Frontage (ft) Eligible Units g Eligible Units Shoreline (ft) License y Surf Club of R-144 Primary 297 44 0 297 https:// v Marco www.myflorii Hilton Marco R-144 Primary500 320 0 500 www•myflob M Island Beach license.com/ Marriott Crystal R-144.2 Primary 362 71 0 362 ttps:// Y Shores y www.myflorii u Swallow Ave R-148 Secondary 20 72 1860 1880 d N/A c m a� a U Q U N N W O CD O a: C N E t V fC a+ Q Packet Pg. 182 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 7. Schedule and Budget: Provide as a separate attachment, if needed. Clearly indicate project phase: Feasibility (F), Design (D), Construction (C), Monitoring (M), or USACE Multiphase (USACE). Include the year of post -construction monitoring in the descriptior N • Cost Reimbursement: Specify eligible costs incurred during the three years prior to the current application's fiscal year that are N not in a current DEP agreement and have not been reimbursed (this includes fiscal years 20/21, 21 /22, and 22/23). Eligible cost - will be added to the current funding request. • Current and Future Costs: Specify eligible costs for the current application's fiscal year that are not in a current DEP agreement E and have not been reimbursed as well as the estimated costs for the next 4 years. Note: If Construction costs are requested in tl Q. current fiscal year, then the Year 1 Post -Construction Monitoring costs will be added to the current funding request. N m Fiscal Project Phase Description Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost a� Total Cost Year E E 0 20/21 U 0 20/21 y Q 20/21 N 0 U 21 /22 r� r M M 21 /22 d Y 21 /22 M d C d 22/23 Q U 22/23 Q U 22/23 N N 00 0 ai 0 23/24 Monitoring Physical, Turtle, Tilling 0 28,900 78,400 107,300 y E 23/24 t cva r Q 23/24 24/25 Design Engineering Design, P&S 0 30,400 82,400 112,800 24/25 Monitoring Physical, Turtle, Tilling 0 29,800 80,700 110,500 24/25 Packet Pg. 183 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application Fiscal Year Project Phase Description Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost Total Cost 25/26 Construction Beach Nourishment and Services 0 608,400 1,646,600 2,255,000 25/26 Monitoring Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling 0 33,100 89,400 122,500 25/26 26/27 Monitoring Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling 0 34,000 92,200 126,200 26/27 26/27 27/28 Monitoring Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling 0 35,100 94,900 130,000 27/28 27/28 8. Tourism -related impacts: Criteria is calculated by the Department using 2021 data. For reference, tax data can be obtained fron the Department of Revenue website: https://floridarevenue.com/taxes/pages/colts from 7 2003.aspx. See Guidance Docume for more information. C, Current funding request includes construction and year one post -construction monitoring C, Project is managed by two or more counties Additional comments As only monitoring funds are requested, only items 1-7 are included in this application. 9. Federal involvement: The documentation to verify authorization, federal cost share percentage, and status of funding award must be provided with the application materials for the award of points. Is the project Federally authorized by the USACE? No Authorization Year: Expiration Year: Does this project have a signed USACE Chief's report or Civil Works Congressional authorization for the No requested phase? m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N 00 0 CD 0 r_ W E t U 2 r Q USACE federal cost share percentage for this project (excluding FCCE): Packet Pg. 184 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application Select all that apply for the requested project phase(s) and include documentation with application materials. C Executed USACE project agreement C Included in USACE work plan C Approved FEMA Project Worksheet C Included in Congressional Appropriations Act C Other documentation: 10. Storm damage reduction benefits: Criteria is calculated by the Department. What is the volume (cy) of advanced nourishment lost since the last sand placement event of a beach restoration or nourishment project as measured above the Mean High Water contour? Data should be consistent with the annual post -construction monitoring reports. For restoration projects, what is the historical erosion rate? 11. Cost effectiveness: Criteria is calculated by the Department. A project design analysis and supporting documentation must be provided with the application materials for the award of points. See Guidance Document for more information. What is the proposed sand placement volume (cy)? What is the nourishment interval (years)? Select all that apply for the current project funding request: C Enhanced longevity: Propose structural or design components that could extend the beach nourishment interval C Dune addition: Incorporate new or enhanced dune structures or new or existing dune restoration and revegetation projects C Innovative technology: Propose innovative technologies designed to reduce project costs C Regionalization: Two or more local sponsors manage projects together or projects propose regional sediment management strategies to conserve sand resources or reduce project costs Additional comments for storm damage reduction benefits and cost effectiveness m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 12. Previous state commitment 8.A.2 Has the Department previously reviewed, approved, and cost -shared on a feasibility or design phase for this project?C Has the current proposed project phase(s) received a partial state appropriation within 3 years of phase completion?C Additional comments 13. Accessible beach area: Criteria is calculated by the Department. Provide additional information for consideration. Describe the landward and seaward edge of the accessible beach width Provide the project boundaries (R-monuments) Provide citations of reference sources 14. Recreational benefits: Provide the percentage of linear footage within the project boundaries which is zoned recreational or open space; for commercial use; or to allow for public lodging establishment, or the equivalent. Provide additional documentation and DBPR website link in a separate attachment, if needed. 15. Mitigation of inlet effects: Criteria is calculated by the Department. Additional comments 16. Successive unfunded requests Is the current proposed project phase(s) a successive, unfunded request? If so, how many years of successive request(s) is the current application? Does the successive request add the construction phase? Packet Pg. 186 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application 17. Environmental habitat enhancement: Criteria is calculated by the Department. See Guidance Document for more informatioi Is the project within a designated critical habitat area for threatened or endangered species that is subject to extensive shoreline armoring? Is the project within a non -designated area where extensive shoreline armoring threatens the habitat of threatened or endangered species? If yes to either of the above, does the project exceed best management practices to incorporate turtle - friendly designs and management strategies to protect resources or benefit critical habitat preservation? Provide an explanation and supporting documentation for the strategies which exceed best management practices 18. Readiness to construct Does the project have an active state permit? Permit number Authorization date Expiration date Does the project have an active federal permit? Permit number Authorization date Expiration date Have all necesssary easements been acquired for the upcoming or proposed construction phase? Has the necessary local funding been secured for the proposed project? If so, provide a copy of the draft Resolution. The signed Resolution is due by October 5, 2022. Is an Erosion Control Line established along the project length? Additional comments for readiness to construct m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 r_ W E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 187 1 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Beach Projects Application Provide additional information and comments below or attach supporting documents. Packet Pg. 188 1 N Q 06 (ZZOZ 18 a0qua0;deS 0011!W O:D AJOSIApd Ie}seoo : L4££Z) 10310ed epu06V WO - ZZ-90.60 :}uGwt4oe;;d P' W Ef3 6F3 bF3 NEf� b9 b9 69 Qj00 � 0000 000 0000 ON1 C', O b[} 64 b9 — GOS yg bF3 O O O O O O O ;.+ r..0 r/1 O O O a1 oc 00 p M M M sn b9 5o4 69 b9 59 r � 69 b9 4,oq b9 b9 b9 6�} bA to to bA bA bJ) , y un tb bA O .. CtCn U Q U _lz _lz Q ,s. ,s. !:.� CA CA CA V1 C/1 7 tb N N N N tb N N N y t � � 4 4 4- cn cn 03 03 ct ct C13 c 03 m ap o aQ �n aA tin o tin bn O O •cn O 0 0 O O O •cn O 4-1 O O U U O i.r O O O O O O O O O N OM M N N N N N N M O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N (ZZOZ 18 jagwa;dag 0044lwWOO AJOslnpy le;se0D : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wy3ea V 0 N C1 Q 6 �---- - v e = Y iT a i m U OMmCID P o Q) 3 a2 f i O > Q) C)o N x O U m' U J , N 41\ o Ott rn iL I� I � ' I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I O •x I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - m a` c 0 0 w m u m E in = m c 0 U f a a w � I H T 0 T .0 E W lL N C LL E v u 2 C C n c N rn � rn � J V N d c cm as y E E� N C c w O t N O, w u E2 o °vo o w u -a a, M.w v s,_ c c u v o iYm� m 0 E n c E O N O O D vao'�ca�iu� `o,E E-It ov ill vuM u v C co co 6 Z N M (ZZOZ 19 jegwa;dag aa;;iwWOD tiOSIAPV lejSe0o : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :au8wg3eaay JI v a _ > 01 Y a. I � R' "4 • I � � O � j v�i U u 6 Q) 0 _ 1• I• . _ I .., U U 4 m i I A � F — I pjIooqI � - -y .. I Gr7 o tl 04 ''i. ��►•cl'�' New 3 !-•+ •�� co W 1.11 L 1 - 0• _LU L +fin �• Q 'UI � N� •p oc LU E I �•/-�• `•/./ I I E .Y w O m I I u E 2 to O N I I I I I � . c y rn I I I � N d I I I c as I I I y y OE 01 m � v v ti C M O w 1n O O t N 6 N I e° E mu0 o w v�o TAG E nC I E ONE Oz 7Q u O �J W O -T 2 O U c I. y �u w w- K I o'ma"Em vA /� v V H -� °�' u V n u y N Z N M � I I I I I I I (ZZOZ I8 jagwa;dag 0044lwWOO tiosinpy JOISCOO : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :au8wg3BjjV m c �� ■+ � a Y t g-- LL ly c U 2: 0 0_ LU m LV 1 1 � U O' U1 c 1 I I I 0 N N y I I I I a N � N I 1 I I C caI cm .j I v E m v E u� " I o o 0 L LU �' ti o E,v EO ate+ NN O w v�o+ w U ai �^ •�" N c Y U a Z m W [O E> N p p 7 v O U O N O 0 ; ao e a�U w w m c a v va E u v V H Y °N' U V n U y Uaj y Z N ni u 0 Ol U (ZZOZ 18 jagwaldag aa;;IW WOO tiOSIAPV lejSeOo : LMZ) PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ•80.60 :auawg3eaay M N C1 a . J t r \ ``1 I O iL d m u u S gLLn o O f r O p) o t A M O > 75 CO 1 i OJ Cn i U O , R _t� w I •_ m oo W f 1 I z o I� o y I o t I W u I � I ♦ � Iv u (. I E (U fw v c u d r u° 01.7 W W W m �E LL G i I � w I •I c 1 0 II I N I I 01 I c I I y rn I I I as I I I I I I I .v, o O P m ti = I a v c ME 0 O O V LnW 'L"=o E,N w y �N • +�. I o o v o? of ], W U .n v�Y Va ED � N C � n �+ N ) w O v T 4. �avmvua_�� /3 41 I rnEE-t, ov u u n� U N ZI co a 0 CQ :s.+ (ZZOZ '8.lagwa;dag aa;;lwWOD tioslnpy lelSeOD : LM6 PA39d epua6y OVO - ZZ-80.60 :auawg3eaay v 01 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •d Ise {� '11AW � . . cl a v d C � L � mho fvLL o 8 U c O Q) V) > O U U 0 m' �o C E c O d w y y E E O 10 � `o o w U � E ° E +° a° N 0 Zm C C U e, V O j Y m d I p O O N O cao'mcwv�i 5EE-t V1 Y vvi u M N 0 m d co : Z N M RESOLUTION NO.22 - 8.A.2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S "FLORIDA BEACH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2023/2024 FUNDING REQUESTS" TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR LONG RANGE FUNDING REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023/2024, AGREEING TO SERVE AS THE LOCAL SPONSOR, SUPPORT PROPOSED PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND COMMITMENT TO PROVIDING THE REQUIRED LOCAL COST SHARE. WHEREAS, Collier County's Coastal Zone Management, acting on behalf of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, has prepared Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Requests to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for long range grant funding for Fiscal Years 2023 /2024; and WHEREAS, the funding requests are to fund the following three Collier County Projects: 1. Collier County Beach Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. 2. Marco Island Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. b. Engineering, Design, Plans and Specifications and Pre -Construction 3. Wiggins Pass Dredging a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring and Tilling 01 Packet Pg. 195 WHEREAS, the timely maintenance and restoration of these high quality and readily© accessible public recreational beaches is critical to preserve their value and viability, and to provide a boost to both the environment and the economy of Collier County tourism, including hotels, restaurants and related commercial activities; and WHEREAS , the role of the County government in maintaining and restoring beaches is appropriate and crucial; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners supports these three funding requests and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request for Fiscal Years 2023/2024; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to serve as the Local Sponsor; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is able and committed to providing the required Local Cost Share; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to support proposed project activities; and WHEREAS: the Board of County Commissioners supports funding contained in previously approved funding contracts, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has enacted the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended, which commits funding to beach renourishment, beach maintenance and beach park facilities. 2 Packet Pg. 196 8.A.2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The Board supports the Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Requests prepared for submittal to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for long range funding for Fiscal Years 2023/2024, and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request; 2. The Board of County Commissioners is willing to serve as the Local Sponsor and support the maintenance and renourishment projects. The Collier County's Coastal Zone Management has the staff dedicated to provide Project Management and Administrative support; and, 3. The Board of County Commissioners is committed to providing the required Local Cost Share. The required funds have been committed through the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this _ day of 12022. DATE: ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK As Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Penny Taylor, CHAIRMAN Colleen M. Greene Managing Assistant County Attorney 3 Packet Pg. 197 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION 8.A.2 Local Sponsor Collier County - Growth Management Department - Coastal Zone Management Section Federal ID Number (FEID) 59-6000558 Primary Contact Name Andrew Miller Title [Manager Mailing Address Line 1 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Mailing Address Line 2 City [Naples Zip Code 34104 Telephone Number (239)-252-2922, c (239) Email Address Andrew.Miller@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Contact Information PART II: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that all information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Local Sponsor MillerAndrew Date: 022.0ed 14:39: 1 -04'00' g p Date: 2022.07.30 14:39:21-04'00' Electronic or scanned signatures accepted. Printed Name Andrew Miller Date Packet Pg. 198 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. Project Name: As listed in the Inlet Management Plan (IMP) or Strategic Beach Management Plan (SBMP) ggins Pass Inlet Management 2. Project Description: Include county, location with reference to DEP range monuments, brief project history, and description of proposed activities. The Wiggins Pass Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline in Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments R-16 and R-17 and the project is adjacent to approximately 2,300 feet of critically eroded Gu shoreline. The dredge sites are located within Wiggins Pass, South and North Channels and the Gulf of Mexico. The nearshore and beach disposal sites are located north of the inlet, between DEP Reference monuments R-12 to R-15.5, and south of the inlet, between R-18 and R-20. The ebb shoal disposal area is located offshore of Wiggins Pass, approximately 300-1,000 feet north of the authorized inlet channel. ie project permits also includes the periodic maintenance dredging of 4,700 feet of the Water Turkey Bay navigational channel to e design depth of -5.0 feet MLW, with 0.5 foot over -depth allowance, for a maximum allowable dredge depth of -5.5 feet. The annel widths range from approximately 90 feet to 140 feet. The initial phase of the latest Inlet Management Plan Study was implemented in 2013 by dredging approximately 107,000 cy for maintenance dredging and initial realignment of the channel. Per the Inlet Management Plan study, Wiggins Pass is currently dredged at regular intervals of approximately 4 years to maintain navigable depths for recreational boaters, with optional interim dredging events every two years to address shoaling across the navigation inlet gulf entrance. In 2015, an interim maintenance dredging project excavated 13,000 cy to clear the shoal across the main inlet entrance channel. Material was placed in the ebb sho, disposal area north of the channel and within the flood shoal disposal. FDEP finalized the inlet management plan in April 2018. In Spring 2018, dredging of 100,000 cy with disposal split 2/3 of the total volume (67%) to the north and 1/3 of the total volume (33%) to the south to maintain the navigation of the inlet, refine and reinforce the alignment begun with the 2013 project. Dredgin of Wiggins Pass was concurrent with the dredging of Doctors Pass as a means for sharing of common costs, such as mobilization to reduce costs. In March 2020 the County conducted a small interim dredging project which removed approximately 21,400 cy from Wiggins Pass and 26,650 cy from Water Turkey Bay with placement in the nearshore zone north of Wiggins Pass along Barefoot Beach from FDEF reference monument R-12 to R-14. Due to storms since this project completion, the County is considering an emergency dredging project to remove shoals that impede navigation. Wiggins Pass was dredged between January 26, 2022 and March 10, 2022 with tl- removal of 66,033 cy with 65,043 cy available for pay. Approximately 21, 413 cubic yards was placed north of the inlet on the beach and in the nearshore of Barefoot Beach and 16,747 cy was placed south of the inlet on the beach and in the nearshore near Delnor- Wiggins State Park. m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N W 0 ai 0 r_ CD E z U M r Q Packet Pg. 199 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application 3. Use of Requested Program Funds: Provide a brief description of tasks to be completed in each requested phase (Feasibility, Design, Construction, or Monitoring). Indicate which tasks are cost reimbursement from previous fiscal years. Monitoring: Funds are requested for Environmental & Physical Monitoring, and Tilling 4. Map: Provide as an attachment. • Format: The project area must be formatted at a minimum of 1" = 200' scale and include a compass rose and legend. • Required elements: Project boundary, DEP reference monuments, shoreline designated as critically eroded, area of inlet influence, and permitted sand bypassing placement area M N 5. Project length: Total restored project boundary (in feet) as listed in the IMP or SBMP. 10,560 feet lid 6. Schedule and Budget: Provide as a separate attachment, if needed. Clearly indicate project phase: Feasibility (F), Design (D), OM Construction (C), or Monitoring (M). Include the year of post -construction monitoring in the description. d • Cost Reimbursement: Specify eligible costs incurred during the three years prior to the current application's fiscal year that are c not in a current DEP agreement and have not been reimbursed (this includes fiscal years 20/21, 21/22, and 22/23). Eligible cost: a� will be added to the current funding request. Q • Current and Future Costs: Specify eligible costs for the current application's fiscal year that are not in a current DEP agreement Q and have not been reimbursed as well as the estimated costs for the next 4 years. Note: If Construction costs are requested in tl C) current fiscal year, then the Year 1 Post -Construction Monitoring costs will be added to the current funding request. N N W Fiscal c Project Phase Description Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost Total Cost m Year 20/21 See Attachment E t U 20/21 r Q 20/21 21/22 21/22 21/22 Packet Pg. 200 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application Fiscal Project Phase Description Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost Total Cost Year i c 22/23 c c c 22/23 22/23 t a a 23/24 23/24 23/24 24/25 24/25 ' c c c 24/25 , c 25/26 25/26 ' 25/26 c c c c 26/27 i a 26/27 26/27 27/28 27/28 27/28 Packet Pg. 201 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application 7. Sand reaching the inlet Provide the estimated annual quantity (cubic yards) of beach quality sand reaching the updrift boundary of the improved jetty or inlet channel: 8. Severity of erosion Provide the annual bypassing objective (cubic yards/year) adopted by the IMP or SBMP or as determined by a Department -approved study: 9. Balancing the sediment budget Provide the current annual average of bypassed material (cubic yards) since the adoption of a bypass objective: Provide a brief description of when the last sediment budget engineering analysis was completed for the inlet and area of inlet influence. Discuss any proposals to update the sediment budget. Beause only monitoring funds are being requested in FY 23/24. only items 1-6 have been included with this application. Packet Pg. 202 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application Historical bypassing volumes: In the table below, provide the annual bypassing volumes (cubic yards/year), for the previous ten years (from the last calendar year or the most recent calculation). Attach additional documentation as needed. Year Quantity Bypassed (cy) - Sand Transfer Plant Quantity Bypassed (cy) - Dredging Dredge Location Placement or Disposal Ar 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total per method Total bypass volume Years since IMP adoption Annual average bypass Bypass objective m lid U M d c m a� a U Q U N N W 0 CD 0 C W E z U 2 r Q Percentage of bypass objective: Packet Pg. 203 8.A.2 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application 10. Increased bypassing and cost-effectiveness Provide the estimated increase in annual bypassing of sand (cubic yards/year) proposed for the project: Provide the estimated shortfall of annual bypassing of sand (cubic yards/year) within the inlet system: Is the proposed project requesting construction phase funds for a major inlet management project component? If yes, and for the award of points for the cost-effectiveness of using inlet sand criteria, provide an opinion of probable cost per unit volume of the inlet and all other sand sources, certified by a licensed professional engineer. 11. Inlet Management Plans Select all that apply: Existing IMP: The proposed project has an existing IMP or completed Inlet Management Study that has been approved by the Department. Updated IMP: The Department has received and approved an update to an existing IMP in the C form of a current Inlet Management Study/sediment budget analysis within the previous five years, or there is an update proposed to an existing IMP in the current application. C New IMP: A new inlet management study is proposed for submission to the Department for an adoption in an IMP. 12. Enhanced longevity of proximate beach nourishment projects Annualized beach nourishment volume of proximate beach nourishment project: 13. Active permits Does the project have an active state permit? Permit number: Authorization date: Expiration date: Does the project have an active federal permit? Permit number: Authorization date: Expiration date: m U M a. c m a� a U Q U N N CO 0 CD 0 a� E t U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 204 Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Inlet Projects Application 14. Federal funds available Does the proposed project have federal funds available? If so, provide supporting documentation. 15. Secured local funds Has the necessary local funding been secured for the proposed project? If so, provide a copy of the draft Resolution. The signed Resolution is due by October 5, 2022. Additional comments 8.A.2 (ZZOZ 18 jegLueldes OOIIIW OO AJosinpd JBISBOO : LMZ) 101OBd epu06br OVO - ZZ-80.60 :IuGwt43Bl)v R O O O o v o R dssi�dsifl�iflvjds� 0 F O VL 0 O C 0 o 0 0 � u r% vNi v`ni O �E r v�i O N v�i vMi v�i M a69 b9 � b9 69 � 69 b9 69 � CO p coy, O � R V� vNi 69 in H9 O 69 h 69 N v6i 69 in b9 vcci 69 OM 6�9 O U i 0 0 �s 0 vq 0 US o 59 0 vs 0 sus 0 �s 0 s9 0 V� w U c U 0 U 0 0 � ... � on � on on on cn on on on on on F U P. a❑ ,� a a p a� a� a a p a a a� a Pr C. V� Pr b 0.i x 0.i Ci. W b O O O O O 2 N O O O O O U U U U V V V N V A Q O V U U U U a L N O N O N O N Cl 00 N O 01 N O O M O M O N M O M M O V M Cl R 0 N M N 7 N V'1 N �O N l� N 00 N O� N O N N N N M N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N M O N M O N M O NL M O O N a Y V m a 8.A.2 RESOLUTION NO.22 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S "FLORIDA BEACH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2023/2024 FUNDING REQUESTS" TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR LONG RANGE FUNDING REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023/2024, AGREEING TO SERVE AS THE LOCAL SPONSOR, SUPPORT PROPOSED PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND COMMITMENT TO PROVIDING THE REQUIRED LOCAL COST SHARE. WHEREAS, Collier County's Coastal Zone Management, acting on behalf of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, has prepared Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Requests to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for long range grant funding for Fiscal Years 2023 /2024; and WHEREAS, the funding requests are to fund the following three Collier County Projects: 1. Collier County Beach Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle Monitoring and Tilling. b. FY 2023/2024 Beach Renourishment Design for Park Shore and Clam Pass Park 2. Marco Island Nourishment a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring, Turtle 1 Packet Pg. 207 8.A.2 Monitoring and Tilling. Wiggins Pass Dredging a. FY 2023/2024 Environmental Monitoring, Physical Monitoring and Tilling 2 Packet Pg. 208 8.A.2 WHEREAS, the timely maintenance and restoration of these high quality and readily accessible public recreational beaches is critical to preserve their value and viability, and to provide a boost to both the environment and the economy of Collier County tourism, including hotels, restaurants and related commercial activities; and WHEREAS , the role of the County government in maintaining and restoring beaches is appropriate and crucial; and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners supports these three funding requests and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request for Fiscal Years 2023/2024; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to serve as the Local Sponsor; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is able and committed to providing the required Local Cost Share; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to support proposed project activities; and WHEREAS: the Board of County Commissioners supports funding contained in previously approved funding contracts, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has enacted the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended, which commits funding to beach renourishment, beach maintenance and beach park facilities. 3 Packet Pg. 209 8.A.2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The Board supports the Florida Beach Management Program 2023/2024 Funding Requests prepared for submittal to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for long range funding for Fiscal Years 2023/2024, and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request; 2. The Board of County Commissioners is willing to serve as the Local Sponsor and support the maintenance and renourishment projects. The Collier County's Coastal Zone Management has the staff dedicated to provide Project Management and Administrative support; and, 3. The Board of County Commissioners is committed to providing the required Local Cost Share. The required funds have been committed through the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this _ day of , 2022. DATE: ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK As Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Penny Taylor, CHAIRMAN Colleen M. Greene Managing Assistant County Attorney 4 Packet Pg. 210 (ZZOZ 18 aaquie4dag 00441W OO AJosinpbr jejseo3 : L6££Z) N Q 06 }aMOed epu86y OVO - ZZ'80'60 m U V�1 � m � � � c U c N O U U p J a` c 0 o W N n � N O V o d v U .- iz y c E s O o U F0 jp V W W 3 0 in d W W I , NN O � N N � O W d N L E E v EV o w w u O C �� Ui c s E E _�z v° c n 0 a c o E 2.� yZub w NI mEo a Z N v ZE -------- 17 .0m (ZZOZ `8 aaquaa;daS aa;;iu WOO AJOSIAPV le;SEOO N Q � I i I L4££Z) ;aMaed epua6y OVO - I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I //JII I I I I I I I ' I _ I l w 'x I Li c� I I I I I ;uauayae;;�y Fv <qA ZZ'80'60 m U V�1 � m � Da)c U c N O U U p J NN N N � p N 2 p w V w u, O 0v N c IV s -�z'o cn 0y v 2 i- u E y w NI mEpm Z N N Q 06 _ _ a_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ M I .. IZ I� w I (ZZOZ `8 aagweldag 0011!W OO AJosinpd le4Seoo : L6££Z) 10310ed epu86br M :;uawgoelly 70 w I I m LLrPin o a'= < z a ,L f U C L (B > L f m' U U ° I � J u �S � a I o I � a I I I a II N N I O I m v E 1 F I I I I I I I I I I I I Q2Jp �ooa� �U il!q!apu e'� z '1 U = m a N T O N c m a o m � d W 0 LL N z 0 3 0 0 (ZZOZ 18 aagwe4dag 00441W aOO AJOsinpbr le}seOo : LLUZ) leMoed epueBV OV:D - ZZ'80'60 m U V�1 � m � � � c U c N O U U p J 81 , NN O � N N � O W d u N EV O w w n O N n v mo w w a o 'v QEvcC N c 'o y c n 0 a o w o N U v E y w01 m E o m 0 Z V N Q 06 ______________________________ __________________._____I in rn (ZZOZ `8 aagweldaS aa};iu WOO AJOSinpbr jejseo3 I I I I I I I I I I I I � Q I o� O I I O I I I I I - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o 4nlw595 �U Illgiapue� a, U m?a o v � = a o m U LLUZ) leMoed epueBV 3,y3 - I I I I I I I I I I I I ZZ'80'60 m U V�1 � m � � � c U c N O U U p J 0 N N N � O w d m w E 1 p w > V w �n O N N � d N W w mo a o 'v o m c C N c v y c n 0 a O N o N U i y u w NI mEOm Z V rn (ZZOZ 18 a0qua9jdeS 00411W O:D fdOSInpd le4se0:: L4££Z) 10313ed ePUGBV OVO - I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ZZ'80'60 m U V�1 � m � � � c U c � N 75 U U 0 J O N O � N N � O2 O Ln w d m Evv w � V N � o N om W w a o 'v Q"� v c C E N c v0 c m 0 a c o o N U v E i y w NI mEO a May 12, 2022 8.A.3 MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Naples, Florida, May 12, 2022 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and forthe County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F," 3`d Floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: David Trecker VICE CHAIRMAN: Joseph Burke Steve Koziar Thomas McCann Jim Burke Robert Raymond Robert Roth Raymond Christman (absent) Erik Brechnitz (absent) ALSO PRESENT: Andy Miller, Coastal Zone Manager Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney Farron Bevard, Operations Analyst Packet Pg. 217 May 12, 2022 8.A.3 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Communications, Government & Public Affairs Division, or view it online. I. Call to Order Chairman Trecker called the meeting to order at 1.04 p.m. II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum of seven was established. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. McCann moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously, 7-0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes March 10, 2022 Mr. McCann moved to approve the minutes of the March 10, 2022, meeting. Second by Vice Chairman Burke. Carried unanimously, 7-0. VII. Staff Reports 1. Extended Revenue Report "FY22 TDT Collections Revenue Report" dated March. 31, 2022. Mr. Miller reported that the good news is that TDT collections are well above what was budgeted and what we anticipated. For TDC dollars, we're 66% up from what was budgeted, and the 195 Fund is almost $3.5 million above what we had projected to this date. Chairman Trecker said a 66% positive variance overal I and for the 195 Fund, a 66% positive variance? That's remarkable. I guess there's no indication that collections are going to slow down? Mr. Miller said we're hitting the peak as we speak, so we should get one more good month and it should taper off after that. But we've done very well so far, so 1 expect things to continue as well. Chairman Trecker asked if there were any comments or questions. Mr. Roth said he saw that it's 66% above budget, and that's phenomenal. I know last year we were also above budget. I wonder if we can tell if we have the data as to whether we are above or below where we were in actuality last year. I don't know to what extent the budget may have taken into account how successful things were last year. Mr. Miller said if you can follow my mouse on the screen, you can see the variance over FY21, so we're 60% above where we were last year. Mr. Roth said in actual collections, not just budget? Mr. Miller said that was correct. Mr. Roth said that's great, amazing. 2 Packet Pg. 218 May 12, 2022 8.A.3 V1I. New Business 1. Update on FY2022 Wiggins Pass & Doctors Pass Dredge Project Mr. Miller reported that there were two successful dredge projects with no real issues. We had some adverse weather that slowed things down a little bit, but we wound up completing Wiggins Pass first, about 65,000 yards, which is what we had planned and budgeted. Then we moved down to Doctor's Pass and it turned out there was not as much sand in the system as there was in January 2021, so instead of getting 25,000 yards, we wound up getting closer to around 15,500. Both projects went off well and we completed them before turtle season. Everyone is pleased that the passes are open for navigation, and we've had zero complaints. Chairman Trecker said that like the sand hauls, these dredgings are not pro forma. They're complex. I think they go underappreciated. You and your crew should get kudos for another very successful job. Congratulations. Mr. Miller said we appreciated you saying so. 2. Update on 2022 Annual Monitoring Reports Chairman Trecker told the Committee that they did a very thorough job, noting that the printout was heavy. There's a huge amount of useful data in there. Report — Collier Beaches Mr. Miller reported that all the beaches are in good shape, if not great shape. We just put a lot of sand on the beaches at south Naples, from Loudermilk Park south to the Pier, and we know that we filled a lot up at Vanderbilt Beach from Marker 22 down to the Ritz, and we also put about 30,000 tons at Pelican Bay, so all those beaches are going to be in great shape for at least a couple of years. Chairman Trecker asked Clam Bay Beach to the south, about Page 20. The shoreline changes and the changes in beach width. Markers R-39 and R-40 fall short, but they don't reflect the sand placement from the Clam Pass dredging, which was done before these measurements were made. Mr. Miller said that was correct. Chairman Trecker said that just walking the beach there, you can see that a lot of these shortfalls have been corrected, so that's certainly good news. (Mr. Miller agreed.) That's not reflected in here. The other thing that caught my attention was Page 31, the southern portion of the Naples beaches. Markers 82 to 84 and some of the areas south of that show significant erosion. I know that you're working with those folks to come up with a plan. My understanding is that there's a beach access issue there, as there is in Pelican Bay, and these folks are going to have to fork up the money themselves. Mr. Miller said that's correct. It's beyond our permit limits, which is 79, around 18th Ave South and after you get past that area, the access becomes kind of sparse until you get to 32"d, 33rd Avenues. But there's a lot of stretch in there without any access, and again, it's beyond our permit limits. But we are in discussions with some players, some stakeholders in that area, for a potential future project. Obviously, they'll have to go through the permitting process and get some funding in place. But we've told them we'll be happy to entertain the idea of a project similar to what we do in Pelican Bay, which is basically a piggyback effort. Chairman Trecker said, Sure. So, no real impending issues there that you see? Mr. Miller said there were none. Chairman Trecker noted that the conclusiorts on pages 41 and 42 suggest no major projects. Packet Pg. 219 May 12, 2022 8.A.3 Mr. Miller said no major projects this year, barring a hurricane. Chairman Trecker asked: So any minor things, touch-up, small sand hauls? Mr. Miller said there are a couple places that we've had interest in possibly fixing up, some of the narrower sections. We met with Moorings Park residents this week and they have a little concern because there is a 90-foot, as opposed to 100-foot... Our monument right at the north side of their park. What we have asked is that we monitor again, which we are required to do at Doctors Pass, anyway, in October. And we'll see how the summer systems come through. If all goes as we hope, some of the sand that we've just placed at Lowdermilk and Naples Beach to the north and to the south of that area will hopefully migrate to Moorings Park Beach. If it becomes critical in October, if things haven't settled down and they've become worse, we may look at what we're referring to as a micro -project. But we'll wait until October to find out. Chairman Trecker asked if there were any comments or questions. Mr. Burke asked where the sand from the Clam Pass dredging goes. I know we don't do dredging there. Chairman Trecker said they place it north and south. Mr. Burke asked: Both sides? Chairman Trecker said yes, both sides and there's migration from the placement. It sometimes happens very rapidly there. Mr. Burke said it looks very healthy. Chairman Trecker said for the moment. Yeah, absolutely. Any questions or comments? Report — Central Marco and South Marco beaches Mr. Miller reported that Central Marco Beach and South Marco Beach are in similar shape to the Collier beaches. We just renourished South Marco in April of 2020 and reports all show that a good majority of that sand is still in place. Typically, we'll do South Marco Beach on a seven-year cycle, so if we did it in 2020, we've got at least a couple more years, barring storms. Central Marco is one of the widest beaches we have in Collier County. The only issue we have on Central Marco is sometimes we get a little bit, or a lot, of depression closer to the shoreline, but what happens down there is if we get a depression, the rainwater sits in there and we get a black algae mat that forms. We're going to keep a close eye on that this year and, hopefully, head that off as it arises. Obviously, we can't do a whole lot of work before turtle season ends in November, so it would be more of a monitoring effort than anything until then. 3. ES - Humiston & Moore Engineers - South Marco Beach Restoration USACE Permit Application Mr. Miller said, as he mentioned earlier, we just renourished South Marco Beach in 2020 and our permit for that effort expired in January 2021, so this effort by Humiston & Moore is to get that permit reestablished for another 15 years and it'll be in time for our next planned renourishment at South Marco. The recommendation is to approve a Work Order with Humiston & Moore Engineers to provide professional support services for the application preparation of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit for the South Marco Island Beach Restoration under contract No. 18-7432 CZ, for time and materials not to exceed $34,132, and to make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Chairman Trecker asked if that work was c4 sistent with previous support work of this sort. Packet Pg. 220 8.A.3 May 12, 2022 Mr. Miller said it was. Chairman Treeker asked if there were any questions or comments. Vice Chairman Burke moved to approve a Work Order with Humiston & Moore Engineers to provide professional support services for the application preparation of the U.S Army Corps of Engineers Permit for the South Marco Island Beach Restoration under contract No. 18-7432 CZ, for time and materials not to exceed $34,132, and made a finding that this item promotes tourism. The motion was seconded. The motion carried unanimously, 7-0 4. ES - Water Quality Subcommittee Report IMr. Roth, Subcommitee Chairman Vertical Oyster Gardens Video Mr. Roth said that before we get into the written summary, he wanted to make a few comments and then show the video. The committee looked at several possible things that could be done about promoting good water quality around Collier County. We focused seriously on a seagrass-restoration proposal. We had a presentation by CSA (Ocean Sciences Inc.) about a project they were involved in. And from what we saw, it doesn't seem to be something that would be practical to apply down here, at least right now. That program was for something up in North Carolina in the Outer Banks. The Department of Transportation put a bridge in. They had to mitigate the impact of taking out about 5 acres of seagrass, so they constructed a barrier in the bay between the Outer Banks and the shoreline. That was huge and after three or four years, it's starting to show some promise, but I just didn't see it being applicable to a location down here, and I can imagine what it cost. The State was paying for it. It was probably a mitigation measure that came out of their own Environmental Impact Review with the Army Corps of Engineers getting the permits for the bridge, so it didn't seem as simple as planting cuttings of seagrass and hoping they would grow. So, we zeroed in on a Vertical Oyster Garden Program and there's a video you may have already looked at. It's on the links that you had and will generate some questions that we can discuss. [The Video. How to Adopt and Install Vertical Oyster Gardens, was viewed.] Mr. Roth said this isn't for everyone, but we thought it was kind of a cool thing and it might induce a better level of public engagement, which is something that we could all use more of in terms of water quality here, and just bringing awareness to the issue. One thing that's interesting is they were talking about seawalls not providing enough surface area for oysters in this organic growth, but at least I see in Marco, a lot of people are getting their seawalls replaced with these corrugated plastic walls and the oysters and the barnacles don't adhere to those. So, they're not even having a place to get footing in the canals. That was really the notion of the program. We could see the County maybe making an initiative or getting some volunteers and community -based organizations to deal with the mechanics of something like they have in Sarasota. The initial thought was that we might form a working committee that would consist of County staff and people to help with this, to reach out, but I see we still have some more work to do as a Subcommittee on this. If this Committee thinks this is a worthwhile thing to pursue, we would try to meet with the Conservancy and Rookery Bay and see if we could get more of an interest in something like this. I'd like to hear from the committee. Chairman Trecker asked whether he was looking for concurrence from this group that you should study this further and gather more information. Mr. Roth said before we go out and say we're representatives of Collier County, we should explore if this is something we'd like to do in Collier County and talk to some of these organizations, rather than just do it. I think this Committee needs to be behind it and to whatever extent we need permission from Packet Pg. 221 8.A.3 May 12, 2022 anyone else to do something like that, we should seek that. Chairman Trecker asked if there was any sense that putting in these Vertical Oyster Gardens really could cut nutrient levels substantially? In other words, is there some indication whether it's really worth the trouble? Mr. Roth said probably not. I don't think you're going to see the water clear up from this effort, but I think it's public education, more so, that will begin to get people interested and businesses to donate these shells. Maybe they could market that, like "We donate to water quality efforts in Collier County," or something like that. It needs that marketing spend to get that kind of engagement because that's kind of lacking. Everybody talks about water quality. This is a way that people can actually do it, to have one on their dock. There was a program a few years ago that became very popular and it's still growing, the ocean habitats that a lot of people in canal homes have floating under their docks. They're just horizontal layers of material with space in between. The baby fish and crabs and others inhabit it. I have two under my dock and I have a ton of fish. is that making the water better? Well, it's not making it worse that's for sure. But it certainly got me engaged with the whole process, so that's what we're thinking. It certainly isn't going to hurt, spreading the word about water quality and efforts that people can do themselves. This is not going to pertain to people inland, living on a golf course. It's a limited focus group. But again, we're talking about water quality, not transportation or traffic. Chairman Trecker noted that the Committee is limited to coastal efforts. Mr. Roth said, right, so this is perfect. Chairman Trecker asked if the group promoting the VOGs have any sense of how many nutrients are being removed per string or per square area. Mr. Roth said the best we're going to get is each oyster is capable of 20 to 50 gallons of filtering a day. That's what the video said. It's a matter of how many oysters do you actually get to grow. Is it a failure, or is it not? But I think it's a step in the right direction. Chairman Trecker said it's clean and understandable. Mr. Roth said and it's fun. It's like having a goldfish tank. You go outside and say, `Oh, I got a new colony of oysters today' or `It's working.' That alone has a benefit. So, I'd like to hear from the Committee. Vice Chairman Burke said he thinks it checks the sustainability box. This is really non-invasive, it's not a chemical treatment, it's low-cost and it's something that's sustainable. One question I have is do we harvest these at some point? Mr. Roth said no, these are not for consumption. Vice Chairman Burke asked how long each strand would last, two years, three years? Mr. Roth said he asked that about his dock habitat and was told that at some point, it would get choked and it would end up in a dump. You're not going to be able to rehabilitate it. You're going to have to find a way to dispose of it. Vice Chairman Burke noted that they're not marketable due to a concern of contamination. What can we do with them then? Is there something else we can do with them? Mr. Roth said they could be recycled and they could make more VOGs out of them. Vice Chairman Burke said that from a sustainability standpoint, my druthers would be to see this Packet Pg. 222 8.A.3 May 12, 2022 married with FGCU. They could conduct a turbidity study because that's a good indication of water quality. Vice Chairman Burke said it's a relatively easy thing. It's just a secchi disc. It's another disk and you drop it in the water and you measure at what depth do you lose sight of that disk. Mr. Roth said but that changes, right? I have one myself. Vice Chairman Burke said at least it would track the data and it also gives us some ability to look at whether we're pushing a rope here because inland development is getting worse. We look at the data and we're not looking at days, weeks, months, but you want to collect, ideally, years of data because if you're seeing an upward trend and you're doing things to improve it, and it keeps degrading over time, that should be a wakeup call. Mr. Roth said that's for sure. But that's a bigger conversation we can have. I don't think these Vertical Oyster Gardens are going to alter that. There are bigger things that have to be done. Vice Chairman Burke said that's why he'd like to see this program married with data to see if it's going to improve water quality, and to possibly get grant money through the County, NOAA or FGCU. Maybe it could be a college project. Mr. Roth said there may be someone at the water school who is on top of this. Hopefully that data is out there and on our next step, we can find that. Mr. Koziar said he thinks the greatest benefit will probably be public awareness of water quality. When you start seeing these projects, it just reminds me of my children coming home from school with little victory garden projects, school experiments. It was a great way to get younger children involved in the water quality because public awareness is going to be very important, and that's really the key. When the various agencies are seeking funding, you have to have the public awareness. Just little things like that. On Marco Island, the City has a Burrowing Owls Program where if you put up a little fence around your yard and have a Burrowing Owls there, they'll pay you $100 a year or something. It increased public awareness about the owls and tortoise nests. Mr. McCann noted that the Subcommittee struggled to obtain the authority to get involved in water quality. It was quite a struggle. Not everybody liked the idea. Now that we have it, it seems to me that we've got to start doing something about it and this may not be a home run, but I'd love to get at least on the base path to the Coastal Advisory Committee being identified with water quality and the efforts to do it. So, whether or not it's a home run, it looks like it could certainly be successful to an extent. The Tampa video showed that and we could learn more as we go along. They said we could get in the game, so let's get in the game. Mr. Raymond said one of the objectives here was to get the community involved, but to even do that, we have to get CAC approval. Do you think we should move forward? There are plenty of things we can do, like contact Manatee County and find out in a little more detail what they've done. It's a start. It's not going to solve all problems, but it will definitely get the community and students involved. You could work through the Conservancy and maybe Rookery Bay. They have tours all the time, so I think it'd be interesting to at least get started. Mr. Burke agreed it's a start. Where do the VOGs come from? Does someone market them? Vice Chairman Burke said the Conservancy in that area is involved. Mr. Raymond said the restaurants also are involved. Mr. Roth said someone has to make them, to string the oyster shells. 7 Packet Pg. 223 May 12, 2022 8.A.3 Mr. McCann asked if they're best hung in inlets. Mr. Roth said they're for saline water, estuary water, canals. The water is perfect for it here because if you have oysters growing and barnacles, we don't get too many barnacles down on Marco, but we get a ton of oysters and they can grab on. But as I said, they're losing ground because the seawalls that are going in are all plastic now and they don't adhere to it. I think they like the concrete because they get the lime out of the cement. But at least they would get that out of the expired shells. Vice Chairman Burke said eventually they're going to grow on there once that plastic gets scuffed up a little bit. They have marine paint that's supposed to be no barnacles. Barnacle -free paint? Chairman Trecker said that as this moves forward, an objective should be that the County takes the lead and can push interest. I would like this to be headed by us. Everything sounds positive. Let's entertain a motion to approve further planning by the Water Quality Subcommittee on the use of Vertical Oyster Gardens to improve water quality in Collier County. Mr. McCann moved to approve further planning by the Water Quality Subcommittee on the use of Vertical Oyster Gardens to improve water quality in Collier County. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously, 7-0. Chairman Trecker noted that once this is formulated, the next step would be to go before the Board of County Commissions to get their concurrence on the program. It sounds like a great program. 5. Election of Officers Chairman Trecker noted that the election of officers usually occurs in May or June, but we aren't certain we will have a meeting in June. Mr. Roth said if it has the Coastal Advisory Committee's name on it, all the better. Chairman Trecker asked for nominations for Chairman and then closed the nominations before the full committee vote. Mr. Raymond moved to re-elect Chairman Trecker. Second by Vice Chairman Burke. Carried unanimously, 7-0. Chairman Trecker asked for nominations for Vice Chairman and then closed the nominations before the full vote. Mr. Burke moved to re-elect Vice Chairman Burke. Second by Mr. Ravmond. Carried unanimously, 7-0. IX. Old Business Chairman Trecker asked for a brief update on the U.S. Army Corps project. Mr. Miller said he didn't have much more to add that what he told the Committee at the last meeting. In October 2021, the report was on the verge of going to the chief for his signature and it was basically sidelined because of some cost issues that would have had a negative effect on the benefit -cost ratio, so the District was advised to go back and relook at the study. But since the deadline and the funds were expiring within the month, the District asked for a waiver request for a time extension and some additional funding. That is still being reviewed by headquarters. We have heard no additional information, so we're just in a wait -and -see mode. Chairman Trecker said he recalled him saying earlier that the Army Corps is weighing all the projects to see which should get priority. Packet Pg. 224 8.A.3 May 12, 2022 Mr. Miller said that was correct. The good news, as far as our project goes, is that the initial project involved some very controversial, expensive walls and gates that were part of the escalation of the cost of the concrete and steel work skyrocketing. So, those items were pulled from Recommended Course of Action No. 4, which is essentially a beach and dune project. So, a lot of the controversial items are no longer in the Recommended Course of Action. But again, that's still being reviewed by headquarters. Chairman Trecker noted that the waiver request started in October, so we know government is slow. Do we have any sense when we'll get an answer? Mr. Miller said it would just be a guess, so he's just waiting. Chairman Trecker noted that Gary McAlpin was involved. Does he know? Mr. Miller said he has been communication with the Army Corps, and there's no new information. Chairman Trecker noted that Vice Chairman Burke doesn't believe in this approach. Vice Chairman Burke noted that it's a step in the right direction, but it provides less protection and you haven't solved the flooding problem, so it's a risk. Chairman Trecker asked if there were any other comments or discussion. Mr. Koziar said he understood that there will be a meeting between the County and Marco Island to further resolve any permit issues with respect to Collier Creek and the City of Marco Island's permit for the dredging of the lagoon in front of Hideaway Beach. Mr, Miller said that was correct. They hope it will be an informative meeting regarding Collier Creek and its permit. We hope to get support from the City and move forward with FDEP and getting that permitted and ready for construction as quickly as we can. X. Announcements None XI. Committee Member Discussion None XII. Next Meeting June 9, 2022, 1 p.m. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chairman at 1:46 p.m. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee David cker, Chairman These minutes were approved by the Committee on 1 Y rj c , as presented, or as amended 9 Packet Pg. 225