The URL can be used to link to this page

CCLAAC Agenda 08/31/202226.A.2 AGENDA CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 3, 2022, 1:00 P.M. Commission Boardroom N W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F"), Third Floor c N M All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak. Individuals who would like to participate in person must complete and submit a speaker form. Members of the public who would like to participate remotely, 3 should register HERE to fill out the online speaker registration form. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy Q and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. Individuals who register online will ' receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Summer Araque at (239) 252-2979 or email to: E ConservationCollier@colliercountyfl.gov E 0 U 1. Roll Call N A. Approval of CCLAAC Members attending the meeting remotely Q 2. Approval of Agenda c r 3. Approval of July 6, 2022, Meeting Minutes N a 4. Coordinator Communications a A. Committee Member application(s) J B. Introduce new staff C. BCC Items 00 M N D. Miscellaneous Items N 5. Old Business N N A. Acquisition Cycle 10 Purchase Agreements ri 1. Panther Walk parcels 0 a a. Aguilar b. Behnke c. Burns d. Joyce, D & J Naples Investors, LLC (2 pacrels) e. Ortega — Guasb f. Pena g. Thommen h. Wright i. Zhuang B. Acquisition Cycle 10 Updates 6. Subcommittee Reports A. Lands Evaluation & Management — Chair, Bill Poteet — last meeting April 21, 2022; meeting to be scheduled for August/September to address request by BCC to evaluate preserves B. Outreach — Chair, Brittany Patterson -Weber — last meeting February 15, 2022 C. Ordinance Policy and Rules — Chair, Michele Lenhard - last meeting June 1, 2022 Packet Pg. 287 26.A.2 7. New Business A. Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) reviews 1. S & B Properties - Marco Island TPMA 2. South Terra Corp - Marco Island TPMA N N 3. VanCleave - Rivers Road Preserve TPMA N 4. County Barn Land Trust - County Barn Road TPMA N 5. Dr. Robert H. Gore III TPMA 3 6. Panther Walk TPMA Q 7. HHH Ranch TPMA w 8. Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub TPMA r E E B. Upcoming ISCs scheduled for September and October ci L C. Acquisition Cycle 11A Property Summary, Public Comments, and Ranking The Committee will be taking Public Comments in advance of the Ranking. Public speakers may speak on any or all of the properties on the Cycle IIA Property list: Q c 0 1. H C& J S Adams Trust u .3 2. Caracara Prairie Preserve Project (1 owner) a a 3. County Barn Land Trust 4. Dr. Robert H Gore II Preserve Project (4 owners) J 5. HHH Ranch - Section 33 (4 owners) c M 6. Marco Island Parcels (4 owners) 7. Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub (1 owner) cm 8. Panther Walk Preserve Project (4 owners) N n; 9. Rivers Road Preserve Project (1 owner) r 10. Multi -parcel Projects - Winchester Head and Red Maple Swamp Q 11. Preserve Expansion parcels - Panther Walk and Dr. Robert H. Gore III M 12. Re -rank properties from Cycle 10 B-list aD Per Ordinance 2019-03 and the Ranking Procedure: 1. We will rank properties A, B, or C. 2. Will prioritize the A properties with a 1, 2, or 3. 3. Then vote on the overall ranking results. a� a� 8. Chair and Committee Member Comments 9. Public General Comments U a 10. Staff Comments J U U 11. Next Meeting - September 7, 2022 12. Adjourn aD E Committee Members: Please notify Summer Araque at 252-2979 no later than noon Monday, August 1, 2022, Q if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on an agenda item. Packet Pg. 288 July 6, 2022 26.A.3 MINUTES OF THE CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Naples, Florida, July 6, 2022 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3`1 Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN VICE CIIAIRMAN Bill Poteet Michele Lenhard Gary Bromley Brittany Patterson -Weber David Corban Karyn Allman Ron Clark Rhys Watkins (Vacancy) ALSO PRESENT: Summer Araque, Conservation Collier Program Coordinator Sally Ashkar, Assistant County Attorney Mitchell Barazowksi, Environmental Specialist Melissa Hennig, Environmental Specialist Packet Pg. 2 9771 26.A.3 July 6, 2022 1. Roll Call Chairman Potect called the meeting to order at 1:00P.M. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established with 8 Members present in the Boardroom. Rhys Watkins wa.s ivelcomed as a nen, Member of the Committee. A. Approval of CCLAAC Members attending the meeting remotely All Members were personally in attendance. 2. Approval of Agenda Ms. Letdrard proved to approve the Agenrlrr. Second by Ails. Pattersonr-YVeber. Carried unanimously 8-0. 3. Approval of Meeting Minutes A. June 1, 2022, Regular CCLAAC Ms. Lenhard moved to approve the mirtrttes of the June 1, 2022 subject to the following change. ® Paragraph 2 line 6 - froze ".Rich Blonna, Marco Island City Council noted the property was taken of the market..." to "Rich Blonna, Marco Island City Council noted the property was taken off the market..." Second by Yls. Patterson-YVeber•. Ctrr�ried unrrrtirrrorrsly 8 - 0. B. June 13, 2022, Special CCLAAC Ms. Lenhard proved to approve the minutes of the June 13, 2022 as presented Second by 1Vls. Patterson -Weber. Carried unanimously 8 - 0. 4. Old Business A. Acquisition Cycle 10 Update 1. Moody -- Agreement for Sale & Purchase Ms. Araque presented the Executive Summary "Approve an Agreementfor Sale and Purchase for 59.79 acres tinder• the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program, al a cost not to exceed $51, 700 (j1�Ioody-Crcrivfor°d) " for consideration. Ms. Patterson -Weber moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioner's approve an Agreementfor Sale and Purchase for 59.79 acres under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program, at a cost not to exceed $514,700 (Moody-Crawvford). Second by Ms. Lenhard. Carried unanimously 8 - 0. 2. Hussey - Agreement for Sale and Purchase Ms. Araque presented the Executive Summary "Approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase for approximately 256 acres under the Conserwiti.on Collier Land Acquisition Prograrn, at a cost not to exceed $2, 091, 000 (HH11 - Hussey) " for consideration. Ms. Lenhard proved to recommend the Board of County Con trnissioners approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase approximately 256 acres under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program, at a cost not to exceed $2,091,000 (HHH - Husse)). " Second by Ms. Patterson -Weber. Carried unanimously 8 -- 0. 3. Updates N N O N ri ar 3 al N N O N t0 21 2 Packet Pg. 290 26.A.3 July 6, 2022 Ms. Araque reported 13 landowners in the Panther Walk Preserve Target Protection Area Have accepted the County's offer to purchase their parcels and the Purchase and Sale agreements will be brought forth to the Committee at the appropriate time. During Committee discussions .it was noted Staff will; Bring forth budget updates at the time of the quarterly ranking so the Committee is aware of the status of the program's funds available for purchase of lands. Investigate the feasibility of utilizing remote participation for Subcommittee meetings to facilitate attendance by Members and the public. B. Acquisition Cycle 11 Updates Ms. Araque reported 32 applications have been received to date, Mainly in relation to the program's Target Protection Areas. 5. New Business A. Donation from Geddes Levenson and Alex Rubinsteyn through the South Florida Wildlands Association (time cerfain after 3.B.) Matthew Schwartz of the South Florida Wildlands Association introduced AIex Rubinsteyn who was providing a donation through the Wildlands Association to Conservation Collier. Mr. Rubinsteyn addressed the Committee noting $6,000 was raised via gifts during his wedding to Geddes Levenson with the intention of donating the funds to the program for acquisition of a parcel in the Rivers Road Preserve 'farget Protection Area. The concept arose from their dedication to protection of wildlife in southern Florida including the Florida Panther. He hopes the activity will spur other individuals, organizations, etc.to provide future donations to the program. The Committee thanked the parties for their consideration. B. Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) reviews 1. Hugh Starnes — Caracara Prairie Preserve TPA Ms. Hennig presented the "Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Prograrn In.ilial Screening Report for• the Starnes Parcel is in the nor-thtivest portion of Collier Coa w)t PT in Section 19, Toivns•hip 40, Rcinge 28 and Connnission District S " for consideration. She noted the property received a score of 105 out of 400. Speaker Hugh Starnes noted the property has been utilized by Alico, Inc. as a trailer site for workers. There is also a cattle pen on site for use by those operating the cattle lease on Caracara Prairie Preserve. IIe hopes those activities may continue if the parcel is obtained by the County. There is a drainage easement for the ditch on the property which provides stormwater relief for Corkscrew Road. Ms. Araque reported she would investigate the feasibility of the existing uses remaining active after acquisition by the County. 2. Adams Trust Mr. Barazowlcsi presented the "Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Pr°ogr•ain Initial Screening Report for the H C ce JSAdcons Trust" for consideration. IIe noted the parcel is N N O N CM a� al N N O N t0 A Packet Pg. 291 26.A.3 July 6, 2022 4.34 acres and located northeast of Alligator Flag Preserve and the property received a score of 105 out of 400. i N O 3. Annecy[Barfield — Marco Island TPA `V vi Ms. Hennig presented the "Conservation Collier Land .Acquisition Program Initial Screening Report for the Ilfareo Island Target AllailingArea ,4nnecy/I34rrfeld Parcels" for consideration. She noted the property received a score of 207 out of 400 and the City of Marco Island and a many residents support acquisition of the parcels. ,Speakers Rosemary Tolliver, Audubon Eagle Watch noted the parcels are still on the open market and c have been the site of Bald Eagle fledglings this year. v Stefan Bolsen, Real Estate Broker for the properties noted the parcels are still for sale. A c party interested in purchasing the lots backed out due to the environmental requirements associated with the property. The landowner .is still interested in selling them to the County for a preservation purposes. A fence was installed along the roadway to help prevent the Gopher c Tortoises from entering the streets. Rich Blonna, Marco Island City Council noted the property provides great opportunities for passive recreation and walking paths. FIe expressed concern the property did not score higher a for recreation and vulnerability. _ Brad Cornell, Audubon of the Western Everglades reported numerous volunteers assisted with the installation of the fence which is an indication of the public support for acquisition of the property. Recent surveys on the island indicate a large population with occupation of 2,700 M burrows and a population estimate of 1,375 tortoises. He recoinniended the Australian Pines on remain until a native species has taken their place to ensure the eagles continue to utilize the site N CD during the transition. N Meredith Budd, Florida Wildlife Federation stressed the importance of the Marco Island co properties and their Gopher Tortoise habitat. The habitat conflicts with urban land uses as they 3 are generally comprised of sandy soils and upland vegetation. Ms. Henning noted the development of the scoring criteria are a tool used by the program, and not the sole item used for determining the ranking of a parcel being considered for acquisition. 4. Chestnut — Marco Island 'TPA Ms. Hennig presented the "Conservation Collier Land Acduisilion Prograin Initial Screening Report for the Marco Islaml Target Hailing Area - Chestnut Parcel " for consideration. She noted the property is located on Inlet Dr. approximately 0.6 miles north of Otter Mound Preserve, is 0.53 acres in size and received a score of 253 out of 400. Speakers Rich Blonna, Marco Island City Council noted the parcel may have the potential for Gopher Tortoise relocation. Brad Cornell, Audubon of the Southern Everglades noted there are studies which arc ongoing or been completed on the island for the Gopher Tortoise including tracking and census counts. Once concern of relocating Marco Island tortoises to central Florida locations is the high mortality rate for the species due to the different environnienta.l characteristic of the area. 4 Packet Pg. 292 26.A.3 Judy 6, 2022 During Committee discussion it was noted there is the potential for expansion of the area should the parcel be acquired as there are vacant lots abutting the property. N N O C. ISC reviews N ri 1. S & B Properties — Marco Island TPA N Mr. Barazowksi presented the " 1llarco Island Target 1lllailingArea Initial Crilerict Screening � Forma" for the above referenced parcel, The property is located on Inlet Dr. approximately 0.2 a miles northeast of Otter Mound Preserve. ' The property satisfies 3 Initial Screening C'rileria. Ms. Patterson -Weber ntovedfor the application to move,forivard in the acquisition process and for Staff to prepare rrn Initial Criteria Screening Report. Second b}, Ms. Allman. Carried fill an.inlotrsly 8 — 0. 2. South Terra Corp — Marco Island TPA Mr. Barazowksi presented the "iVfarco Island Target Mailing Area Initial Criteria Screening Foram" for the above referenced pareel. The property is located on Caxambas Dr., with the Cycle 10 A -list Agua Colima parcel on its northwest border and is approximately 0.2 miles east of Otter Mound Preserve. The propert}) satisfies 4 Initial Screening Criteria. Sl eaker o Rich Blonna, Marco Island City of Council noted the parcel is adjacent to the Agua Colina N parcel and provides water access and historical/archeological opportunities. N N O N Ms. Lenhard moved for the application to move forward in the acquisition process and for co Staff to prepture an Initial Criteria Screening Report. Second by Als. Patterson-iYeber. 21 Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 3. VanCleave — Rivers Roars Preserve TPA Mr. Barazowksi presented the "Rivers Road Preserve Target rlltailing Area Initial Crilerict Screening Forma" for the above referenced parcel. The property is located ore Rivers Road directly across the street from River's Road Preserve. The property satisfies 3 Initial Screening Criteria. Ms. Patterson -Weber moved.for the application to move for3vard in the acquisition process and for Staff to prepare an Initial Criteria. Screening Report. Second by Ms. Allman. Carried unanirnouslj, 8 --- 0. 4. County Barn Land Trust — County Barn Road TPA Ms. Hennig presented the "County Barn Target Protection Area Initial Criteria Screening Forma" for the above referenced parcel. The property is located off County Barn Rd.,_just north of Collier County's fleet Complex. There .is access to the property for maintenance activities and the infestation of non-native species is primarily confined to the understory vegetation. The properly satisfies 4 Initial Screening Criteria. Packet Pg. 293 26.A.3 July 6, 2022 Ms. Paterson -Weber moved,for the application to move forward in the acquisition process and for Staff to prepare an Initial Criteria Screening Report. Second by Ms. Allman. Carriedc unanimously 8 0. M Target_ Protection Mailing Area Reviews ' a� Ms. Hennig reported the Screening Forms and Reports for the parcels in the Target Protection a Mailing Areas will be combined to reduce redundant reporting and presentations given the plant communities and topography are similar throughout the areas, the surrounding development is minimal, and the parcels are adjacent to each other. However, the parcels will be individually ranked by the Committee at time of consideration. c 5. Dr. Robert 1-1. Gore IH TPA — 3 parcels Ms. Hennig presented the "Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve Target Protection kktiling Area (IT111A) Initial Criteria Screening Fbrni" for the above referenced parcels. The properties are in North Golden Gate Estates just north of 1-75, south of 36th Ave. SE, and between the Fakaunion canal and the old Harley Davidson Test 'track. The properties satisfy S Initial Screening Criteria. Ms. Lenharrd moved for the application to move forward in the acquisition process and for Staff to prepare an Initial Criteria Screening Report. Second by Mr. Bromley. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 6. Panther Walk TPA — 3 parcels Ms. Hennig presented the "Panther Walk Preserve Target Protection Illfailing Area (TP1 M) N Initial Cr•rteri(r Screening Forr)r" for the above referenced parcels. The properties are in North N Golden Gate Estates just south of Immokalee Rd., west of Everglades Blvd., and just south of co 56th Ave. NE. The screening includes the entire 272 parcels (532.4 acres) in the TPMA. 2' The properlies satisfy 5 Initial Screening Criteria. � Als. Lenhard moved for the application to move forward in the acquisition process and for Staff to prepare arr I7riiial Criteria Screening Report. Second by Ms. I'rrttersorr-Weiler. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 7. HIIH Ranch TPA -- 3 parcels Ms. Hennig presented the "HHH Ranch Target Protection iWailing Area (I'Ph1A). Initial Criteria Screening Forraz" for the above referenced parcels. The properties are located just north of 1-75 adjacent to the I-1I1H Ranch A -list parcels from Cycle 10. The ISC covers the entirety of the TPMA for the HHI I Ranch Area. The properties satisfy 5 Initial Screening Criteria. Mr. Corban moved for° the application to move forward in the acquisition process and for Staff to prepare an Initial Criteria Screening Report. Second by Mr. Clark. Carried urranimorrsly 8 — 0. 8. Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub TPA -- I pax -eel 6 Packet Pg. 294 26.A.3 July 6, 2022 Ms. Lennie presented the "NGGE Serub Target Proteclion rllfailingArea ("I'P11IIA) Initial Criteria Screening Forrn " for the above re f-erenced parcel. The property is in North Golden N Gate Estates south of Immokalee Rd., east of Everglades Blvd., and between 54th Ave. NE and c 48th Ave. NE. The ISC covers the entirety of the 'I'PMA. M The propmrt), satisfies 3 Initia! Screeni.'ng Criteria. a� Mr. Corban stover!f r the application to rrrove for ward in the acquisition process rand.for Q Staff to prepare an Initial Criteria Screening Report. Second by Mr. Corbin. Carrier! ' as unanimously 8 -- 0. G. Coordinator Communications A. BCC Items Ms. Araque noted the BCC will be considering the following items at upcoming meetings: ® The Pepper Ranch Camp Post Agreement in July. o The Moody property acquisition in. July and the Hussey property in July or August. • The accelerated acquisition process in September (based on direction from upper management). Ms. Lenhard expressed concern on the delay for the BCC considering the accelerated acquisition process given the status of the real estate market and the expedited way the Committee seeks to address the issue. She recommended they be notified on the Committee's concerns in delaying review of the proposal given the item was moved forward based on their advice. Others noted the BCC is busy with many items including budgetary matters and a new County Manager just initiated work so it would be beneficial to allow them to dictate the timing of the process. N 0 N Ms. Lenhard moved to notify the Board of County Conanissioners the Committee is disappointed tD 21 with the decision to delay Itearing of the proposal to etpedite the ranking process. The concern 0 is the delay inhibit. the process for accelerated acquisitions and the itent should be heard in July. Second by Mr. Bromley. Motion failed 3 "yes" 4 "no. Clrrrirntrarx Poteet, Mr. Cor•brut, Ails. � Patterson -!Veber and 11r. Watkins voted "no." Ms. Allman abstained. c B. Miscellaneous Items 1. CCLAAC Meeting Date .July 5, 2023 —Move to a different day/date? Ms. Araque she will be circulating a poll to the Members to determine the date the meeting should be hold. 2. Vacancy hosted Ms. Araque reported Mr. Secf resigned from the Committee and the vacant seat will be advertised in accordance with County policy. 7. Subcommittee Reports A. Lands Evaluation & Management — Chair, Bill Poteet — last meeting April 21, 2022; meeting to he scheduled for August/September to address request by BCC to evaluate preserves. Also, need to schedule one for December or January for upcoming acquisitions. Noted Packet Pg. 295 26.A.3 July 6, 2022 B. Outreach ---- Chair, Brittany Patterson -Weber --- Last.Meeting Februaiy 15, 2022 Noted N N O C. Ordinance Policy and Rules ---- Chair, Michele Lenhard- last meeting June 1, 2022 `V ri Noted I., ar Chair Committee Member Comments a None ' 9. Public General Comments Brad Cornell, Audubon of the Western Everglades noted the accelerated acquisition process is utilized by Lee 2020 as parcels become available in the CREW Water & Land Trust they move directly to the purchase stage. He commended the Committee on the expedited manner they dealt with the accelerated purchase proposal and related quarterly ranking concept. He agreed with Ms. Lenhard on the urgency the BCC should consider the proposal, especially given the current real estate market. He recommended any interested individual should contact their District Commissioner on the need to expedite the process as proposed by the Committee. 10. Staff Comments a Ms. Hennig recognized the Committee for their efforts. _ Ms. Araque thanked Ms. Hennig for her efforts in the applications and Noted moving forward one meeting packet will be made available at the meeting for public information purposes; if a Member needs one, they should notify Staff the Monday before the meeting and it will be provided upon M request. N N 11. Next Meeting Date 04 August 3, 2022 co 21 0 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 3:08P.M. Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee William Poteet, Cl; man These minutes approved by the Board/Committee. on �` 2, 2, as presented or as amended N®R Packet Pg. 2 6 26.A.4 Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 5/11/2022 8:47:34 PM. Name: Bernard F. Gallagher Jr Home Phone: 112398109370 Home Address: 11110 Partridge Circle Apt. 101 City: Naples Zip Code: 34104 Phone Numbers Business: E-Mail Address: Bernie901 comcast.net Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Not indicated Place of Employment: Retired How long have you lived in Collier County: more than 15 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guiltv of a criminal offense (anv level felonv or first degree misdemeanor only)? Nol Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or Packet Pg. 297 26.A.4 recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: None Education: Graduated with an AA degree from Montgomery Junior College in Maryland. Graduated with a BS degree from the University of Maryland in Business Administration. Before I retired - held a SRA appraisal designation from the Appraisal Institute and was a state certified general appraiser in bot Florida & Maryland. Do not hold any appraisal designations now. Experience / Background Former Appraiser & Review Appraiser for the National Park Service and the Department of Interior. Appraised and/or reviewed thousands of parcels for acquisition within the boundaries of Big Cypress and East Everglades. Also did some appraisal reviews for Fish & Wildlife in the Florida Keys. Packet Pg. 298 26.A.4 Applicants cl O Applicant Name: Bernard F Gallagher Jr M Representation of Interests. Please explain your relationship with and business interests 3 relating to the following topics. a Environmental and Conservation: Worked with DOI reviewing and/or doing appraisals in several southern states. ® Axricultural and Business. None Educational: Attended and completed many appraisal classes. At one time was designated SRA. Also a Commercial Real Estate Appraiser in 2 states. General Civic and Citizen: None Individual Member Expertise, Knowledge or Interest: Please elaborate on any experience, knowledge or interest you have in the following subjects. Ecology None Conservation: Helped with Collier County beach clean-up ® Real Estate or Land Acquisition: Worked a short period of time at VA in St. Pete as a Realty Specialist. Worked longer at VA Central Office as a Realty Specialist. s Land ApRraisal: Mast of my Federal working career was involved in appraisals and/or appraisal reviews. ® Land Management: None Eco-Tourism: None ® Environmental Education: Completed a class on hazardous waste materials in Texas while with NPS in Naples, FL. Packet Pg. 299 26.A.5 Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 5/16/2022 12:43:25 PM. Name: ohn R. Courtright Home Phone: 239-248-5224 Home Address: 12124 Evergreen Lake Court City: Naples Zip Code: 34112 Phone Numbers Business: E-Mail Address: I -osscourt mail.com Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Not indicated Place of Employment: Retired How long have you lived in Collier County: more than 15 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guiltv of a criminal offense (anv level felonv or first degree misdemeanor only)? Nol Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or Packet Pg. 300 26.A.5 recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? Yes Paradis Coast Blueway Committee/ Dept.of Parks and recreation Barry Williams Please list your community activities and positions held: School Advisory Council- chairman (1990s) Volunteer: CREW Land & Trust, U.S.Fish & Wildlife Service (assist turtle project), Collier County (various agencies) Boy Scout Troop 2 Committee Chairman 2000s. St. Paul's Episcopal Jr. Warden (2000s) Friends of Panther Refuge: V.P. 2020s Education: Attended Barry College: Public Administration Experience / Background (Retired Miami Dade Firefighter/paramedic.) Packet Pg. 301 26.A.5 Applicant Supplemental Information Applicant Name: John Courtright Representation of Interests: Please explain your relationship with and business interests relating to the following topics. • Environmental and Conservation: Longtime volunteer with multiple Environmental & Conservation entities. Volunteer with: Corkscrew Regional Ecological Watershed (CREW), Florida Fish& Wildlife Commission (FWC), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Friends of Florida Panther Refuge, PaddleFlorida, Collier County Department of Recreation (Blueway), Conservation Collier • Agricultural and Business: I am a member of OF IFAS Collier County advisory committee. • FrlucatinnaI- Have served on school advisory committees in the past. • General Civic and Citizen: Volunteer with Collier County. Was involved with Boy Scouts in the past: served as Committee Chair. Served as Junior Warden for St. Paul's Episcopal Church Individual Member Expertise, Knowledge or Interest: Please elaborate on any experience, knowledge or interest you have in the following subjects. • Ecology: Volunteer with USFWS assisting with seasonal turtle program in the Ten Thousand Islands N.W.R. (8 years). • Conservation: Assist several agencies with special projects. Recently was involved in a 5-year study of grassland sparrows (for FWC). • Real Estate or Land Acquisition: No experience, but have a keen interest in the process of determining and obtaining key lands in Collier County for conservation, ecology, and recreation. • Land Appraisal: No experience Packet Pg. 302 26.A.5 • Land Management: Assist multiple agencies with land projects such as removal of invasives and trail maintenance N 0 N • Eco-Tourism: Member of Florida Society for Ethical Ecotourism (FL SEE) and served on board assisting with Eco-tourism providers credentialling. Worked with Collier County Recreation Department on a task force to highlight water trails (Blueway). Q • Environmental Education: Volunteer with PaddleFlorida, a non-profit that sponsors paddling trips highlighting the five Florida water districts. Member of Florida Paddling Trails Assn. (FPTA) and perform "trail angel" activities in this district. 00 0 M N Packet Pg. 303 26.A.6 Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 5/19/2022 10:10:19 AM. Name: ILouise M Cromwell Home Phone: 240-204-2505 Home Address: 11930 Gulf Shore Blvd. N. #E202 City: Naples Zip Code: 34102-1632 Phone Numbers Business: E-Mail Address: )uisecromwell@gmail.com Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Not indicated Place of Employment: Retired attorney How long have you lived in Collier County: 5-10I How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: 6-9 Have you been convicted or found guiltv of a criminal offense (anv level felonv or first degree misdemeanor only)? Nol Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or recommendations made by this advisory board? No Packet Pg. 304 26.A.6 Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: Member -Florida Bar (1970 to present) (Retired Status); Member -District of Columbia Bar (1974 tc present); League of Women Voters of Collier County (Member -Environmental Affairs Committee) Naples Botanical Garden (Volunteer); Greater Naples Leadership, La Villa Riviera of Naples, Inc. (Community Association), Chair -Garden Committee. Education: Duke University (B.A. 1966; J.D. 1969), Graduate Courses in Garden Design, George Washingto University, (1997-2002),I Experience / Background Following my graduation from Duke Law School in 1969 1 became a staff attorney for Florida Rural Legal Services based in Ft. Myers but also serving Immokalee. Our clients were primarily migrant farmworkers. In 1974 1 moved to Washington DC where I was an Associate Attorney with Steptoe & (Johnson and later Partner with Shaw Pittman Potts & Trowbridge (now Pillsbury Winthrop Shawl lPittman). My specialty was commercial real estate transactions and finance, primarily representing) )developers, banks and tenant corporations. My work involved detailed review of large amounts of data,) (spotting and reducing risks, clarifying imprecise language to avoid costly misunderstandings, facilitating) agreement among very intelligent, tough and often rather strong-willed professionals, ensuring compliance with the law, and closing transactions under demanding deadlines. During the 1990's I also had the opportunity to serve on the boards of two publicly traded companies: FTP Software (NASDAQ) land Crestline Capital, Inc. (New York Stock Exchange), a Marriott spinoff which invested in hotel) (properties. In each case I served on the Governance Committees and focused on ethical and compliance issues. I benefitted from the experience of working as a team with other board members, the company executives and staff. Gardening has been a lifelong pleasure for me. Most of my gardening was done in Zone 7 in a city garden in Washington, DC, although I was able to experiment with a larger landscape (3 )acres) in suburban Maryland after my retirement. I also earned graduate credits over a five year period) lin the Garden Design Masters Program at George Washington University. They offered a year long series) on woody plant identification taught at various public gardens in the DC area and design courses which were offered at night. Some time ago, the Board at my low-rise 32-unit condominium community in )Naples (La Villa Riviera), asked me to redesign our very outdated landscaping. Over the next 15 years,) lmy neighbor Pat Campbell and I worked to educate ourselves on gardening in a semi -tropical climate) land to create gardens that are both environmentally sound and pleasing to our unit owners. This has) been a truly rewarding hands-on experience that has taught me a great deal, not only about native plants and Zone 10 conditions, but about harmonious community living. Packet Pg. 305 26.A.6 DrewKathlene From: BrownAraqueSummer Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 1:43 PM To: DrewKathlene Subject: FW: Supplemental Questions - Louise Cromwell Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged See below from Louise. From: Louise Cromwell <louisecromwell@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2022 7:51 AM To: BrownAraqueSummer <Summer.Araque@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Supplemental Questions EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Land Acquisition Advisory Board Conservation Collier Applicant Supplemental Information Applicant Name: Louise M. Cromwell Representation of Interests: Please explain your relationship with and business interests relating to the following topics: Environmental and Conservation: I am a member of the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, the Naples Botanical Garden, Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary, the Audubon Society, and the Naples Native Plant Society. In Washington, DC, I am a member of the Potomac Riverkeeper Network and the Audubon Naturalist Society. Agricultural and Business: None. I am fully retired from the practice of law. Educational: Duke University (B.A. 1966; J.D. 1969), Graduate Courses in Landscape Design, George Washington University, (1997-2002). 1 participate in a Great Decisions Discussion Group sponsored by the Naples Council on World Affairs. General Civic and Citizen: I am a member of the League of Women Voters of Collier County (Environmental Affairs Committee) and Greater Naples Leadership. I have been the Chair of the Packet Pg. 306 26.A.6 Garden Committee of my Naples condominium community, La Villa Riviera, for over 15 years and am active in the design and care of our gardens. I can think of no more important civic duty than working to combat climate change caused by human activity and preserving habitat for our native plants and animals. I think the mission of Conservation Collier is of great importance. If my interests and skill set would enable me to be an effective member of the Land Acquisition Advisory Board, I would be honored to serve. While I generally spend about seven months a year in Collier County, I am certainly willing to commit to returning to Naples for regular year-round monthly meetings. I also anticipate that there will be many materials to review, as well as time spent learning about the activities and objectives of the Board. Individual Member Expertise, Knowledge or Interest: Please elaborate on any experience, knowledge or interest you have in the following subjects: Ecology: Gardening has been a lifelong pleasure for me. Much of my gardening was done in Zone 7 in a small residential garden in Washington, DC, although I was able to experiment with a larger landscape (3 acres) in suburban Maryland after my retirement. I also earned graduate credits over a five-year period in the Landscape Design Program at George Washington University. Some time ago, the Board at my low-rise 32-unit condominium community in Naples (La Villa Riviera), asked me to redesign our very outdated landscaping. Over the next 15 years, a neighbor and I worked to educate ourselves on gardening in a semi -tropical climate and to create gardens that are both environmentally sound and pleasing to our unit owners. This has been a truly rewarding hands-on experience that has taught me a great deal, not only about native plants and Zone 9b/10a conditions, but about harmonious community living. Of course, gardens aren't just for looking pretty and soothing the soul. Climate change and habitat loss are more important concerns. I am a great admirer of Doug Tallamy and his Homegrown National Park movement. We all try to do our bit, however small. I design and maintain a shrub and perennial "beautification" garden at the entrance to the Newark Street Community Garden in Washington, DC. This community garden on public land managed by the DC Parks & Recreation Department has over 220 fenced plots worked by individual gardeners, mostly devoted to vegetables. Everything is organic. We maintain 6 actively turned compost bins for the use of our gardeners. In accordance with Tallamy's principles, I am working to incorporate at least 70% native shrubs and perennials in the area assigned to me. Conservation: My passion for the outdoors began with my childhood as a tree -climbing, crawfish - catching tomboy and continues to this day. I am an avid birder and spend many happy hours roaming the public areas of Collier County. Of course, it's not just about the birds. Without a healthy ecosystem, we would have no birds. I live within 5 minutes of Freedom Park and bird there at least two or three times a week. As you know, Freedom Park is a tiny miracle: a built and natural filter marsh, a wildlife habitat, an urban recreation area, and, especially with the new 2 N N O N M a E E 0 U 0 An Q 0 .3 a Q _ CU J 00 0 M Packet Pg. 307 26.A.6 weirs and canal improvements, a stormwater management star. Even on the quietest day for wildlife, Freedom Park never disappoints; there is always at least one treasure to discover. Most recently, twin baby Barred Owls have appeared. Of course, Otter Mound is a favorite haunt for birders, especially during fall and spring migration. I N saw my first Caracaras and Sandhill Crane babies at Pepper Ranch. Greater Naples Leadership N recently did a "Done in a Day" volunteer project to publicize the Conservation Collier trails. I v wrote the report for the walk my GNL Class took on the Greenway. I was even lucky enough to get to visit the Railhead Scrub Preserve once several years ago, on a private tour with the Naples a Native Plant Society. I look forward to exploring the Gore property. I have always enjoyed the Conservation Collier venues, but the early days of the pandemic made E me even more grateful for these treasures. My son and his wife and my two grandchildren, then 5 ci and 9, arrived in Naples on March 18, 2020, the day all the beaches were closed to the public, to 0 "shelter while the pandemic passed." How naive we were. They stayed for six weeks. We spent every single morning hiking the Conservation Collier and CREW venues when all the other parks = were shutting down. They really were a lifesaver. 1 realize that recreation is certainly not the only goal for acquisition of Conservation Collier .3 a a preserves, nor should it be, but if citizens have an opportunity to experience at least a few of these venues personally it builds support for the program. The recent referendum continuing the J acquisition program is a demonstration of the taxpayers' approval of the way their money has co 0 been spent. N Birding has also given me the opportunity to understand how a single individual acting as a tiny part of a very large movement can make a difference for our ecology. The last time I checked, eBird, which is operated by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, had 782,497 participating eBirders worldwide who have together submitted 67,278,492 complete checklists reporting 10,634 species. On April 26, 2022, the Tuesday morning birding group in which I participate at the Naples Botanical Garden reported 42 species and 201 individuals over a three-hour period. I try to submit complete checklists every time I bird as an individual. Freedom Park usually yields 25 to 30 species in about an hour and a half. eBird transforms statistics from the global birding community into a powerful resource for research, conservation and education. Real Estate or Land Acquisition: Following my graduation from Duke Law School in 1969 1 became a staff attorney for Florida Rural Legal Services based in Ft. Myers but also serving Immokalee. Our clients were primarily migrant farmworkers. In 1974 1 moved to Washington DC where I was an Associate Attorney with Steptoe & Johnson and later a Partner with Shaw Pittman Potts & Trowbridge (now Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman). My specialty was commercial real estate transactions and finance, primarily representing developers, banks and tenant corporations. 3 Packet Pg. 308 26.A.6 My work involved reviewing large amounts of data; spotting and reducing risks; preparing legal memoranda, contracts, loan documents, leases, etc.; clarifying imprecise language to avoid costly misunderstandings; facilitating agreement among very intelligent, tough and often rather strong- willed professionals; ensuring compliance with the law; and closing transactions under demanding deadlines. During the 1990's I also had the opportunity to serve on the boards of two publicly traded companies: FTP Software (NASDAQ) and Crestline Capital, Inc. (New York Stock Exchange), a Marriott spinoff which invested in hotel properties. In each case I served on the Governance Committees and focused on ethical and compliance issues. I benefited from the experience of working as a team with other board members, the company executives and staff. Land Appraisal: None. Land Management: None. Eco-Tourism: None as an operator, but I am an enthusiastic participant in such adventures. Most recently I enjoyed a two week-long small group birding expedition to Costa Rica. Past trips have included a trip to Utah to explore national parks and to Cape May, New Jersey, to view the fall migration of birds. I am booked on a pelagic birding boat trip to Dry Tortugas next spring. Environmental Education: None as a teacher. Lifelong continuing education as an adult Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 4 Packet Pg. 309 CCLAAC 26.A.7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase for 1.14 acres under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program, at a cost not to exceed $30,600 (Johnson). OBJECTIVE: Request approval of the attached Agreement for Sale and Purchase (Agreement) between the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and Timothy R. Johnson & Jenett Johnson (Seller). CONSIDERATIONS: The Seller's property contains 1.14 acres and is located within is located within Section 30, Township 47 South, Range 28 East near the Conservation Collier's Panther Walk Preserve. The Panther Walk Preserve is located within the Horsepen Strand in North Golden Gate Estates, and acquisition of this parcel serves to further complete the protection of environmentally sensitive lands within the Horsepen Strand. The approved Conservation Collier Purchasing Policy (Resolution 2007-300) requires if the estimated value of the property is less than $500,000.00, one appraisal report will be obtained, and the Offer Amount will be equal to the appraised value. In accordance with the Purchasing Policy, the purchase price of $30,000 was based upon one (1) independent, state -certified general real estate appraisal firm. The total cost to obtain appraisals for 21 parcels in this area was $3,700. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of acquisition will not exceed $30,600 ($30,000 for the property, and approximately $600 for the title commitment, title policy, and recording of documents). The funds will be withdrawn from the Conservation Collier Trust Fund (172). As of September 13, 2022, property costs for Conservation Collier properties, including this property and those under contract, total $111,754,447. Estimated costs of maintenance in perpetuity for this and all Cycle 10 A -list properties have been considered by the CCLAAC and have been incorporated into the Conservation Collier Long Term Financial Management Plan that will ensure management of all Conservation Collier Preserves in perpetuity. The average annual per acre maintenance cost for the first 5 years (initial maintenance costs) is $245/acre including exotic vegetation removal. After initial restoration, the average maintenance costs by Conservation Collier are approximately $150 per acre. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Fee simple acquisition of conservation lands is consistent with and supports Policy 1.3.1(e) in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. - RTT RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the CCLAAC: 1. Approve the attached Agreement; and 2. Recommend to the Board approval and authorization for the Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Board. PREPARED BY: Cindy M. Erb, SR/WA, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist, Real Property Management, Department of Facilities Management CCLAAC - Johnson I Packet Pg. 310 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between TIMOTHY R. JOHNSON & JENETT JOHNSON, his wife, whose address is 4106 Autumnwood Drive, Arlington, TX 76016-4228, (hereinafter referred to as "Seller"), and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose address is 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102, Naples, FL 34112, (hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of that certain parcel of real property (hereinafter referred to as "Property"), located in Collier County, State of Florida, and being more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. WHEREAS, Purchaser is desirous of purchasing the Property, subject to the conditions and other agreements hereinafter set forth, and Seller is agreeable to such sale and to such conditions and agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, and for and in consideration of the premises and the respective undertakings of the parties hereinafter set forth and the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1.01 In consideration of the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Seiler shall sell to Purchaser and Purchaser shall purchase from Seller the Property, described in Exhibit "A". 11. PAYMENT OF PURCHASE PRICE 2.01 The purchase price (the "Purchase Price") for the Property shall be Thirty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 dollars ($30,000.00), (U.S. Currency) payable at time of closing. Ill. CLOSING 3.01 The Closing (THE "CLOSING DATE", "DATE OF CLOSING", OR "CLOSING") of the transaction shall be held on or before two hundred and forty (240) days following execution of this Agreement by the Purchaser, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. The Closing shall be held at the Collier County Attorney's Office, Administration Building, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. The procedure to be followed by the parties in connection with the Closing shall be as follows: 3.011 Seller shall convey a marketable title free of any liens, encumbrances, a exceptions, or qualifications. Marketable title shall be determined according to 1 0 Packet Pg. 311 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 3884556CO07 26.A.7 applicable title standards adopted by the Florida Bar and in accordance with law. At the Closing, the Seller shall cause to be delivered to the Purchaser the items specified herein and the following documents and instruments duly executed and acknowledged, in recordable form- 3.0111 Warranty Deed in favor of Purchaser conveying title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than: (a) The lien for current taxes and assessments. (b) Such other easements, restrictions or conditions of record. 3.0112 Combined Purchaser -Seller closing statement. 3.0113 A "Gap," Tax Proration, Owner's and Non -Foreign Affidavit," as required by Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code and as required by the title insurance underwriter in order to insure the "gap" and issue the policy contemplated by the title insurance commitment. 3.0114 A W-9 Form, "Request for Taxpayer Identification and Certification" as required by the Internal Revenue Service, 3.012 At the Closing, the Purchaser, or its assignee, shall cause to be delivered to the Seller the following: 3.0121 A negotiable instrument (County Warrant) in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. No funds shall be disbursed to Seller until the Title Company verifies that the state of the title to the Property has not changed adversely since the date of the last endorsement to the commitment, referenced in Section 4.011 thereto, and the Title Company is irrevocably committed to pay the Purchase Price to Seller and to issue the Owner's title policy to Purchaser in accordance with the commitment immediately after the recording of the deed. 3.0122 Funds payable to the Seller representing the cash payment due at Closing in accordance with Article Ill hereof, shall be subject to adjustment for prorations as hereinafter set forth. 3.02 Each party shall be responsible for payment of its own attorney's fees. Seller, at its sole cost and expense, shall pay at Closing all documentary stamp taxes due relating to the recording of the Warranty Deed, in accordance with Chapter 201.01, Florida Statutes, and the cost of recording any instruments necessary to clear Seller's title to the Property. The cost of the Owner's Form B Title Policy, issued pursuant to the Commitment provided for in Section 4.011 below, shall be paid by Purchaser. The cost of the title commitment shall also be paid by Purchaser. 3.03 Purchaser shall pay for the cost of Property taxes shall be prorated based allowance made for maximum allowable applicable exemptions and paid by Seiler. recording the Warranty Deed. Real on the current year's tax with due discount, homestead and any other If Closing occurs at a date which the Packet Pg. 312 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 current year's millage is not fixed, taxes will be prorated based upon such prior year's millage. IV. REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 4.01 Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties or at such other time as specified within this Article, Purchaser and/or Seller, as the case may be, shall perform the following within the times stated, which shall be conditions precedent to the Closing; 4,011 Within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof, Purchaser shall obtain as evidence of title an ALTA Commitment for an Owner's Title Insurance Policy (ALTA Form B-1970) covering the Property, together with hard copies of all exceptions shown thereon. Purchaser shall have thirty (30) days, following receipt of the title insurance commitment, to notify Seller in writing of any objection to title other than liens evidencing monetary obligations, if any, which obligations shall be paid at closing. If the title commitment contains exceptions that make the title unmarketable, Purchaser shall deliver to the Seller written notice of its intention to waive the applicable contingencies or to terminate this Agreement. 4.012 If Purchaser shall fail to advise the Seller in writing of any such objections in Seller's title in the manner herein required by this Agreement, the title shall be deemed acceptable. Upon notification of Purchaser's objection to title, Seller shall have thirty (30) days to remedy any defects in order to convey good and marketable title, except for liens or monetary obligations which will be satisfied at Closing. Seller, at its sole expense, shall use its best efforts to make such title good and marketable. In the event Seller is unable to cure said objections within said time period, Purchaser, by providing written notice to Seller within seven (7) days after expiration of said thirty (30) day period, may accept title as it then is, waiving any objection: or Purchaser may terminate the Agreement. A failure by Purchaser to give such written notice of termination within the time period provided herein shall be deemed an election by Purchaser to accept the exceptions to title as shown in the title commitment. 4-013 Seller agrees to furnish any existing surveys of the Property in Seller's possession to Purchaser within 10 (ten) days of the effective date of this Agreement. Purchaser shall have the option, at its own expense, to obtain a current survey of the Property prepared by a surveyor licensed by the State of Florida. No adjustments to the Purchase Price shall be made based upon any change to the total acreage referenced in Exhibit "A," unless the difference in acreage revealed by survey exceeds 5% of the overall acreage. If the survey provided by Seller or obtained by Purchaser, as certified by a registered Florida surveyor, shows: (a) an encroachment onto the property, or (b) that an improvement located on the Property projects onto lands of others, or (c) lack of legal access to a public roadway, the Purchaser shall notify the Seller in writing of such encroachment, projection, or lack of legal access, and Seller shall have the option of curing said encroachment or projection, or obtaining legal access to the Property from a public roadway, within sixty (60) days of receipt of said written notice from Purchaser. Purchaser shall have ninety (90) O Packet Pg. 313 CONSERVATION COLLIER 26.A.7 TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 days from the effective date of this Agreement to notify Seller of any such objections. Should Seller elect not to or be unable to remove the encroachment, projection, or provide legal access to the property within said sixty (60) day period, Purchaser, by providing written notice to Seller within seven (7) days after expiration of said sixty (60) day period, may accept the Property as it then is, waiving any objection to the encroachment, or projection, or lack of legal access, or Purchaser may terminate the Agreement. A failure by Purchaser to give such written notice of termination within the time period provided herein shall be deemed an election by Purchaser to accept the Property with the encroachment, or projection, or lack of legal access. V. INSPECTION PERIOD 5.01 Purchaser shall have one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of this Agreement, ("Inspection Period"), to determine through appropriate investigation that- 1 . Soil tests and engineering studies indicate that the Property can be developed without any abnormal demucking, soil stabilization or foundations. 2. There are no abnormal drainage or environmental requirements to the development of the Property. 3. The Property is in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws and the Property is free from any pollution or contamination. 4. The Property can be utilized for its intended use and purpose in the Conservation Collier program. 5.02 If Purchaser is not satisfied, for any reason whatsoever, with the results of any investigation, Purchaser shall deliver to Seller prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period, written notice of its intention to waive the applicable contingencies or to terminate this Agreement. If Purchaser fails to notify the Seller in writing of its specific objections as provided herein within the Inspection Period, it shall be deemed that the Purchaser is satisfied with the results of its investigations and the contingencies of this Article V shall be deemed waived. In the event Purchaser elects to terminate this Agreement because of the right of inspection, Purchaser shall deliver to Seller copies of all engineering reports and environmental and soil testing results commissioned by Purchaser with respect to the Property. 5.03 Purchaser and its agents, employees and servants shall, at their own risk and o expense, have the right to go upon the Property for the purpose of surveying and conducting site analyses, soil borings and all other necessary investigation. a Purchaser shall, in performing such tests, use due care. Seller shall be notified by Purchaser no less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to said inspection of the a LO Property. E VI. INSPECTION 6.01 Seller acknowledges that the Purchaser, or its authorized agents, shall have a the right to inspect the Property at any time prior to the Closing. 4 Q Packet Pg. 314 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 VI1. POSSESSION 7.01 Purchaser shall be entitled to full possession of the Property at Closing. 8.01 Ad valorem taxes next due and payable, after closing on the Property, shall be prorated at Closing based upon the gross amount of 2021 taxes, and shall be paid by Seller. IX. TERMINATION AND REMEDIES 9.01 If Seller shall have failed to perform any of the covenants and/or agreements contained herein which are to be performed by Seller, within ten (10) days of written notification of such failure, Purchaser may, at its option, terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination to Seller. Purchaser shall have the right to seek and enforce all rights and remedies available at law or in equity to a contract vendee, including the right to seek specific performance of this Agreement. 9.02 The parties acknowledge that the remedies described herein and in the other provisions of this Agreement provide mutually satisfactory and sufficient remedies to each of the parties and take into account the peculiar risks and expenses of each of the parties. X. SELLER'S AND PURCHASER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 10.01 Seller and Purchaser represent and warrant the following: 10.011 Seller and Purchaser have full right and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement and to undertake all actions and to perform all tasks required of each hereunder. Seller is not presently the subject of a pending, threatened or contemplated bankruptcy proceeding. 10.012 Seller has full right, power, and authority to own and operate the Property, and to execute, deliver, and perform its obligations under this Agreement and the instruments executed in connection herewith, and to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. All necessary authorizations and approvals have been obtained authorizing Seller and Purchaser to execute and consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. At Closing, certified copies of such approvals shall be delivered to Purchaser and/or Seller, if necessary. 10.013 The warranties set forth in this paragraph shall be true on the date of this Agreement and as of the date of Closing. Purchaser's acceptance of a deed to the said Property shall not be deemed to be full performance and discharge of every agreement and obligation on the part of the Seller to be performed pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 0 Packet Pg. 315 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 10.014 Seller represents that it has no knowledge of any actions, suits, claims, proceedings, litigation or investigations pending or threatened against Seller, at law, equity or in arbitration before or by any federal, state, municipal or other governmental instrumentality that relate to this agreement or any other property that could, if continued, adversely affect Seller's ability to sell the Property to Purchaser according to the terms of this Agreement. 10.015 No party or person other than Purchaser has any right or option to acquire the Property or any portion thereof. 10.016 Until the date fixed for Closing, so long as this Agreement remains in force and effect, Seller shall not encumber or convey any portion of the Property or any rights therein, nor enter into any agreements granting any person or entity any rights with respect to the Property or any part thereof, without first obtaining the written consent of Purchaser to such conveyance, encumbrance, or agreement which consent may be withheld by Purchaser for any reason whatsoever. 10.017 Seller represents that there are no incinerators, septic tanks or cesspools on the Property; all waste, if any, is discharged into a public sanitary sewer system; Seller represents that they have (it has) no knowledge that any pollutants are or have been discharged from the Property, directly or indirectly into any body of water. Seller represents the Property has not been used for the production, handling, storage, transportation, manufacture or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, as such terms are defined in applicable laws and regulations, or any other activity that would have toxic results, and no such hazardous or toxic substances are currently used in connection with the operation of the Property, and there is no proceeding or inquiry by any authority with respect thereto. Seller represents that they have (it has) no knowledge that there is ground water contamination on the Property or potential of ground water contamination from neighboring properties. Seller represents no storage tanks for gasoline or any other substances are or were located on the Property at any time during or prior to Seller's ownership thereof. Seller represents none of the Property has been used as a sanitary landfill. 10.018 Seller has no knowledge that the Property and Seller's operations concerning the Property are in violation of any applicable Federal, State or li local statute, law or regulation, or of any notice from any governmental body has been served upon Seller claiming any violation of any law, ordinance, code o or regulation or requiring or calling attention to the need for any work, repairs, construction, alterations or installation on or in connection with the Property in a order to comply with any laws, ordinances, codes or regulation with which ' Seller has not complied. q r 10.019 There are no unrecorded restrictions, easements or rights of way (other than existing zoning regulations) that restrict or affect the use of the Property, and there are no maintenance, construction, advertising, management, r leasing, employment, service or other contracts affecting the Property. Q Packet Pg. 316 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 38845560007 26.A.7 10.020 Seller has no knowledge that there are any suits, actions or arbitration, bond issuances or proposals therefor, proposals for public improvement assessments, pay -back agreements, paving agreements, road expansion or improvement agreements, utility moratoriums, use moratoriums, improvement moratoriums, administrative or other proceedings or governmental investigations or requirements, formal or informal, existing or pending or threatened which affects the Property or which adversely affects Seller's ability to perform hereunder; nor is there any other charge or expense upon or related to the Property which has not been disclosed to Purchaser in writing prior to the effective date of this Agreement. 10.021 Seller acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser is entering into this Agreement based upon Seller's representations stated above and on the understanding that Seller will not cause the zoning or physical condition of the Property to change from its existing state on the effective date of this Agreement up to and including the Date of Closing. Therefore, Seller agrees not to enter into any contracts or agreements pertaining to or affecting the Property and not to do any act or omit to perform any act which would change the zoning or physical condition of the Property or the governmental ordinances or laws governing same. Seller also agrees to notify Purchaser promptly of any change in the facts contained in the foregoing representations and of any notice or proposed change in the zoning, or any other action or notice, that may be proposed or promulgated by any third parties or any governmental authorities having jurisdiction of the development of the property which may restrict or change any other condition of the Property. 10.022 At the Closing, Seller shall deliver to Purchaser a statement (hereinafter called the "Closing Representative Statement") reasserting the foregoing representations as of the Date of Closing, which provisions shall survive the Closing. 10.023 Seller represents, warrants and agrees to indemnify, reimburse, defend and hold Purchaser harmless from any and all costs (including attorney's fees) asserted against, imposed on or incurred by Purchaser, directly or indirectly, pursuant to or in connection with the application of any federal, state, local or common law relating to pollution or protection of the environment which shall be in accordance with, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq., ("CERCLA" or "Superfund"), which was amended and upgraded by the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"), including any amendments or successor in function to these acts. This provision and the rights of Purchaser, hereunder, shall survive Closing and are not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 10.024 Any loss and/or damage to the Property between the date of this Agreement and the date of Closing shall be Seller's sole risk and expense. Packet Pg. 317 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 388455600D7 26.A.7 XI. NOTICES 11.01 Any notice, request, demand, instruction or other communication to be given to either party hereunder shall be in writing, sent by facsimile with automated confirmation of receipt, or by registered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to Purchaser: Summer Araque, Coordinator Conservation Collier Program Collier County Parks and Recreation Division Public Services Department Golden Gate Community Park 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd. Naples, Florida 34116 With a copy to: Cindy M. Erb, SRIWA, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist Collier County Real Property Management 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102 Naples. Florida 34112 Telephone number: 239-252-8917 Fax number: 239-252-8876 If to Seller: Timothy & Jenett Johnson 4106 Autumnwood Drive Arlington, TX 76016-4228 Telephone number: 817-676-4047 Fax number: NIA 11.02 The addressees and numbers for the purpose of this Article may be changed by either party by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein. For the purpose of changing such addresses or addressees only, unless and until such written notice is received, the last addressee and respective address stated herein shall be deemed to continue in effect for all purposes. XII. REAL ESTATE BROKERS 12.01 Any and all brokerage commissions or fees shall be the sole responsibility of the Seller. Seller shall indemnify Purchaser and hold Purchaser harmless from and against any claim or liability for commission or fees to any broker or any other person or party claiming to have been engaged by Seller as a real estate broker, salesman or representative, in connection with this Agreement Seller agrees to pay any and all commissions or fees at closing pursuant to the terms of a separate agreement, if any. XIII. MISCELLANEOU 13.01 This Agreement may be executed in any manner of counterparts which together shall constitute the agreement of the parties. Packet Pg. 318 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 13.02 This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors, successor trustee, and assignees whenever the context so requires or admits. 13.03 Any amendment to this Agreement shall not bind any of the parties hereof unless such amendment is in writing and executed and dated by Purchaser and Seller. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be binding upon Purchaser and Seller as soon as it has been executed by both parties. 13.04 Captions and section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only; in no way do they define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provisions hereof. 13.05 All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or number as the context or the use thereof may require. 13.06 No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to which it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as to such provision or a waiver as to any other provision. 13.07 If any date specified in this Agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, then the date to which such reference is made shall be extended to the next succeeding business day. 13.08 Seller is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 13.09 If the Seller holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the Property before Property held in such capacity is conveyed to Collier County. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.) 13.10 This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. XIV, ENTIRE AGREEMENT 14.01 This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain the entire a agreement between the parties, and no promise, representation, warranty or a Packet Pg. 319 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICAT{ON NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 covenant not included in this Agreement or any such referenced agreements has been or is being relied upon by either party. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing and executed and dated by both Purchaser and Seller. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed below. Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC: AS TO PURCHASER: ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and lega4ity Ronald T. Tomasko, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., Chairman Packet Pg. 320 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 AS TO SELLER: I.7I19:191 WITNESSES: r (Printed Name) (Printed Name) � ktllp�_ TIMOTHY WJOON (Si� ature) JENETT JOHNS N (Fkinted Name) , " ( ature) (Printed Name) Packet Pg. 321 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 26.A.7 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 38845560007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF TRACT NO. 68, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 42, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 1.14 acres Packet Pg. 322 CCLAAC 26.A.7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase for 2.73 acres under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program, at a cost not to exceed $63,800 (Sanchez Trust). OBJECTIVE: Request approval of the attached Agreement for Sale and Purchase (Agreement) between the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and Peter S. Sanchez and Nilsa E. Sanchez, as Co -Trustees of the Peter S. Sanchez and Nilsa E. Sanchez Revocable Living Trust, dated July 21, 2015 (Seller). CONSIDERATIONS: The Seller's property contains 2.73 acres and is located within is located within Section 30, Township 47 South, Range 28 East near the Conservation Collier's Panther Walk Preserve. The Panther Walk Preserve is located within the Horsepen Strand in North Golden Gate Estates, and acquisition of this parcel serves to further complete the protection of environmentally sensitive lands within the Horsepen Strand. The approved Conservation Collier Purchasing Policy (Resolution 2007-300) requires if the estimated value of the property is less than $500,000.00, one appraisal report will be obtained, and the Offer Amount will be equal to the appraised value. In accordance with the Purchasing Policy, the purchase price of $63,000 was based upon one (1) independent, state -certified general real estate appraisal firm. The total cost to obtain appraisals for 21 parcels in this area was $3,700. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of acquisition will not exceed $63,800 ($63,000 for the property, and approximately $800 for the title commitment, title policy, and recording of documents). The funds will be withdrawn from the Conservation Collier Trust Fund (172). As of September 13, 2022, property costs for Conservation Collier properties, including this property and those under contract, total $111,754,447. Estimated costs of maintenance in perpetuity for this and all Cycle 10 A -list properties have been considered by the CCLAAC and have been incorporated into the Conservation Collier Long Term Financial Management Plan that will ensure management of all Conservation Collier Preserves in perpetuity. The average annual per acre maintenance cost for the first 5 years (initial maintenance costs) is $245/acre including exotic vegetation removal. After initial restoration, the average maintenance costs by Conservation Collier are approximately $150 per acre. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Fee simple acquisition of conservation lands is consistent with and supports Policy 1.3.1(e) in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. - RTT RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the CCLAAC: Approve the attached Agreement; and 2. Recommend to the Board approval and authorization for the Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Board. PREPARED BY: Cindy M. Erb, SR/WA, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist, Real Property Management, Department of Facilities Management CCLAAC — Sanchez Trust I Packet Pg. 323 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between PETER S. SANCHEZ AND NILSA E. SANCHEZ, AS CO -TRUSTEES OF THE PETER S. SANCHEZ AND NILSA E. SANCHEZ REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, DATED JULY 21, 2015, whose address is 9174 SW 81st Court, Ocala, FL 34481, (hereinafter referred to as "Seller"), and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose address is 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102, Naples, FL 34112, (hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of that certain parcel of real property (hereinafter referred to as "Property"), located in Collier County, State of Florida, and being more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. WHEREAS, Purchaser is desirous of purchasing the Property, subject to the conditions and other agreements hereinafter set forth, and Seller is agreeable to such sale and to such conditions and agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, and for and in consideration of the premises and the respective undertakings of the parties hereinafter set forth and the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1.01 In consideration of the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Seller shall sell to Purchaser and Purchaser shall purchase from Seller the Property, described in Exhibit "A". II. PAYMENT OF PURCHASE PRICE 2.01 The purchase price (the "Purchase Price") for the Property shall be Sixty - Three Thousand Dollars and 00/100 dollars ($63,000.00), (U.S. Currency) payable at time of closing. III. CLOSING 3.01 The Closing (THE "CLOSING DATE", "DATE OF CLOSING", OR "CLOSING") of the transaction shall be held on or before two hundred and forty (240) days following execution of this Agreement by the Purchaser, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. The Closing shall be held at the Collier County Attorney's Office, Administration Building, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. The procedure to be followed by the parties in connection with the Closing shall be as follows: 1 Packet Pg. 324 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 3.011 Seller shall convey a marketable title free of any liens, encumbrances, exceptions, or qualifications. Marketable title shall be determined according to applicable title standards adopted by the Florida Bar and in accordance with law. At the Closing, the Seller shall cause to be delivered to the Purchaser the items specified herein and the following documents and instruments duly executed and acknowledged, in recordable form: 3.0111 Warranty Deed in favor of Purchaser conveying title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than: (a) The lien for current taxes and assessments. (b) Such other easements, restrictions or conditions of record. 3.0112 Combined Purchaser -Seller closing statement. 3.0113 A "Gap," Tax Proration, Owner's and Non -Foreign Affidavit," as required by Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code and as required by the title insurance underwriter in order to insure the "gap" and issue the policy contemplated by the title insurance commitment. 3.0114 A W-9 Form, "Request for Taxpayer Identification and Certification" as required by the Internal Revenue Service. 3.012 At the Closing, the Purchaser, or its assignee, shall cause to be delivered to the Seller the following: 3.0121 A negotiable instrument (County Warrant) in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. No funds shall be disbursed to Seller until the Title Company verifies that the state of the title to the Property has not changed adversely since the date of the last endorsement to the commitment, referenced in Section 4.011 thereto, and the Title Company is irrevocably committed to pay the Purchase Price to Seller and to issue the Owner's title policy to Purchaser in accordance with the commitment immediately after the recording of the deed. 3.0122 Funds payable to the Seller representing the cash payment due at Closing in accordance with Article III hereof, shall be subject to adjustment for prorations as hereinafter set forth. 3.02 Each party shall be responsible for payment of its own attorney's fees. Seller, at its sole cost and expense, shall pay at Closing all documentary stamp taxes due relating to the recording of the Warranty Deed, in accordance with Chapter 201.01, Florida Statutes, and the cost of recording any instruments necessary to clear Seller's title to the Property. The cost of the Owner's Form B Title Policy, issued pursuant to the Commitment provided for in Section 4.011 below, shall be paid by Purchaser. The cost of the title commitment shall also be paid by Purchaser. Packet Pg. 325 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 3.03 Purchaser shall pay for the cost of recording the Warranty Deed. Real Property taxes shall be prorated based on the current year's tax with due allowance made for maximum allowable discount, homestead and any other applicable exemptions and paid by Seller. If Closing occurs at a date which the current year's millage is not fixed, taxes will be prorated based upon such prior year's millage. IV. REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 4.01 Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties or at such other time as specified within this Article, Purchaser and/or Seller, as the case may be, shall perform the following within the times stated, which shall be conditions precedent to the Closing; 4.011 Within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof, Purchaser shall obtain as evidence of title an ALTA Commitment for an Owner's Title Insurance Policy (ALTA Form B-1970) covering the Property, together with hard copies of all exceptions shown thereon. Purchaser shall have thirty (30) days, following receipt of the title insurance commitment, to notify Seller in writing of any objection to title other than liens evidencing monetary obligations, if any, which obligations shall be paid at closing. If the title commitment contains exceptions that make the title unmarketable, Purchaser shall deliver to the Seller written notice of its intention to waive the applicable contingencies or to terminate this Agreement. 4.012 If Purchaser shall fail to advise the Seller in writing of any such objections in Seller's title in the manner herein required by this Agreement, the title shall be deemed acceptable. Upon notification of Purchaser's objection to title, Seller shall have thirty (30) days to remedy any defects in order to convey good and marketable title, except for liens or monetary obligations which will be satisfied at Closing. Seller, at its sole expense, shall use its best efforts to make such title good and marketable. In the event Seller is unable to cure said objections within said time period, Purchaser, by providing written notice to Seller within seven (7) days after expiration of said thirty (30) day period, may accept title as it then is, waiving any objection; or Purchaser may terminate the Agreement. A failure by Purchaser to give such written notice of termination within the time period provided herein shall be deemed an election by Purchaser to accept the exceptions to title as shown in the title commitment. 4.013 Seller agrees to furnish any existing surveys of the Property in Seller's possession to Purchaser within 10 (ten) days of the effective date of this Agreement. Purchaser shall have the option, at its own expense, to obtain a current survey of the Property prepared by a surveyor licensed by the State of Florida. No adjustments to the Purchase Price shall be made based upon any change to the total acreage referenced in Exhibit "A," unless the difference in acreage revealed by survey exceeds 5% of the overall acreage. If the survey provided by Seller or obtained by Purchaser, as certified by a registered 3 Packet Pg. 326 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 Florida surveyor, shows: (a) an encroachment onto the property; or (b) that an improvement located on the Property projects onto lands of others, or (c) lack of legal access to a public roadway, the Purchaser shall notify the Seller in writing of such encroachment, projection, or lack of legal access, and Seller shall have the option of curing said encroachment or projection, or obtaining legal access to the Property from a public roadway, within sixty (60) days of receipt of said written notice from Purchaser. Purchaser shall have ninety (90) days from the effective date of this Agreement to notify Seller of any such objections. Should Seller elect not to or be unable to remove the encroachment, projection, or provide legal access to the property within said sixty (60) day period, Purchaser, by providing written notice to Seller within seven (7) days after expiration of said sixty (60) day period, may accept the Property as it then is, waiving any objection to the encroachment, or projection, or lack of legal access, or Purchaser may terminate the Agreement. A failure by Purchaser to give such written notice of termination within the time period provided herein shall be deemed an election by Purchaser to accept the Property with the encroachment, or projection, or lack of legal access. V. INSPECTION PERIOD 5.01 Purchaser shall have one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of this Agreement, ("Inspection Period"), to determine through appropriate investigation that: 1. Soil tests and engineering studies indicate that the Property can be developed without any abnormal demucking, soil stabilization or foundations. 2. There are no abnormal drainage or environmental requirements to the development of the Property. 3. The Property is in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws and the Property is free from any pollution or contamination. 4. The Property can be utilized for its intended use and purpose in the Conservation Collier program. 5.02 If Purchaser is not satisfied, for any reason whatsoever, with the results of any investigation, Purchaser shall deliver to Seller prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period, written notice of its intention to waive the applicable contingencies or to terminate this Agreement. If Purchaser fails to notify the Seller in writing of its specific objections as provided herein within the Inspection Period, it shall be deemed that the Purchaser is satisfied with the results of its investigations and the contingencies of this Article V shall be deemed waived. In the event Purchaser elects to terminate this Agreement because of the right of inspection, Purchaser shall deliver to Seller copies of all engineering reports and environmental and soil testing results commissioned by Purchaser with respect to the Property. 5.03 Purchaser and its agents, employees and servants shall, at their own risk and expense, have the right to go upon the Property for the purpose of surveying and 4 Packet Pg. 327 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 conducting site analyses, soil borings and all other necessary investigation. Purchaser shall, in performing such tests, use due care. Seller shall be notified by Purchaser no less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to said inspection of the Property. VI. INSPECTION 6.01 Seller acknowledges that the Purchaser, or its authorized agents, shall have the right to inspect the Property at any time prior to the Closing. VII. POSSESSION 7.01 Purchaser shall be entitled to full possession of the Property at Closing. VIII. PRORATIONS 8.01 Ad valorem taxes next due and payable, after closing on the Property, shall be prorated at Closing based upon the gross amount of 2021 taxes, and shall be paid by Seller. IX. TERMINATION AND REMEDIES 9.01 If Seller shall have failed to perform any of the covenants and/or agreements contained herein which are to be performed by Seller, within ten (10) days of written notification of such failure, Purchaser may, at its option, terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination to Seller. Purchaser shall have the right to seek and enforce all rights and remedies available at law or in equity to a contract vendee, including the right to seek specific performance of this Agreement. 9.02 The parties acknowledge that the remedies described herein and in the other provisions of this Agreement provide mutually satisfactory and sufficient remedies to each of the parties and take into account the peculiar risks and expenses of each of the parties. X. SELLER'S AND PURCHASER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 10.01 Seller and Purchaser represent and warrant the following: 10.011 Seller and Purchaser have full right and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement and to undertake all actions and to perform all tasks required of each hereunder. Seller is not presently the subject of a pending, threatened or contemplated bankruptcy proceeding. 10.012 Seller has full right, power, and authority to own and operate the Property, and to execute, deliver, and perform its obligations under this Agreement and the instruments executed in connection herewith, and to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. All necessary 5 Packet Pg. 328 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 authorizations and approvals have been obtained authorizing Seller and Purchaser to execute and consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. At Closing, certified copies of such approvals shall be delivered to Purchaser and/or Seller, if necessary. 10.013 The warranties set forth in this paragraph shall be true on the date of this Agreement and as of the date of Closing. Purchaser's acceptance of a deed to the said Property shall not be deemed to be full performance and discharge of every agreement and obligation on the part of the Seller to be performed pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 10.014 Seller represents that it has no knowledge of any actions, suits, claims, proceedings, litigation or investigations pending or threatened against Seller, at law, equity or in arbitration before or by any federal, state, municipal or other governmental instrumentality that relate to this agreement or any other property that could, if continued, adversely affect Seller's ability to sell the Property to Purchaser according to the terms of this Agreement. 10.015 No party or person other than Purchaser has any right or option to acquire the Property or any portion thereof. 10.016 Until the date fixed for Closing, so long as this Agreement remains in force and effect, Seller shall not encumber or convey any portion of the Property or any rights therein, nor enter into any agreements granting any person or entity any rights with respect to the Property or any part thereof, without first obtaining the written consent of Purchaser to such conveyance, encumbrance, or agreement which consent may be withheld by Purchaser for any reason whatsoever. 10.017 Seller represents that there are no incinerators, septic tanks or cesspools on the Property; all waste, if any, is discharged into a public sanitary sewer system; Seller represents that they have (it has) no knowledge that any pollutants are or have been discharged from the Property, directly or indirectly into any body of water. Seller represents the Property has not been used for the production, handling, storage, transportation, manufacture or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, as such terms are defined in applicable laws and regulations, or any other activity that would have toxic results, and no such hazardous or toxic substances are currently used in connection with the operation of the Property, and there is no proceeding or inquiry by any authority with respect thereto. Seller represents that they have (it has) no knowledge that there is ground water contamination on the Property or potential of ground water contamination from neighboring properties. Seller represents no storage tanks for gasoline or any other substances are or were located on the Property at any time during or prior to Seller's ownership thereof. Seller represents none of the Property has been used as a sanitary landfill. 6 Packet Pg. 329 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 10.018 Seller has no knowledge that the Property and Seller's operations concerning the Property are in violation of any applicable Federal, State or local statute, law or regulation, or of any notice from any governmental body has been served upon Seller claiming any violation of any law, ordinance, code or regulation or requiring or calling attention to the need for any work, repairs, construction, alterations or installation on or in connection with the Property in order to comply with any laws, ordinances, codes or regulation with which Seller has not complied. 10.019 There are no unrecorded restrictions, easements or rights of way (other than existing zoning regulations) that restrict or affect the use of the Property, and there are no maintenance, construction, advertising, management, leasing, employment, service or other contracts affecting the Property. 10.020 Seller has no knowledge that there are any suits, actions or arbitration, bond issuances or proposals therefor, proposals for public improvement assessments, pay -back agreements, paving agreements, road expansion or improvement agreements, utility moratoriums, use moratoriums, improvement moratoriums, administrative or other proceedings or governmental investigations or requirements, formal or informal, existing or pending or threatened which affects the Property or which adversely affects Seller's ability to perform hereunder; nor is there any other charge or expense upon or related to the Property which has not been disclosed to Purchaser in writing prior to the effective date of this Agreement. 10.021 Seller acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser is entering into this Agreement based upon Seller's representations stated above and on the understanding that Seller will not cause the zoning or physical condition of the Property to change from its existing state on the effective date of this Agreement up to and including the Date of Closing. Therefore, Seller agrees not to enter into any contracts or agreements pertaining to or affecting the Property and not to do any act or omit to perform any act which would change the zoning or physical condition of the Property or the governmental ordinances or laws governing same. Seller also agrees to notify Purchaser promptly of any change in the facts contained in the foregoing representations and of any notice or proposed change in the zoning, or any other action or notice, that may be proposed or promulgated by any third parties or any governmental authorities having jurisdiction of the development of the property which may restrict or change any other condition of the Property. 10.022 At the Closing, Seller shall deliver to Purchaser a statement (hereinafter called the "Closing Representative Statement") reasserting the foregoing representations as of the Date of Closing, which provisions shall survive the Closing. 10.023 Seller represents, warrants and agrees to indemnify, reimburse, defend and hold Purchaser harmless from any and all costs (including attorney's fees) asserted against, imposed on or incurred by Purchaser, directly or indirectly, Packet Pg. 330 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 pursuant to or in connection with the application of any federal, state, local or common law relating to pollution or protection of the environment which shall be in accordance with, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq., ("CERCLA" or "Superfund"), which was amended and upgraded by the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"), including any amendments or successor in function to these acts. This provision and the rights of Purchaser, hereunder, shall survive Closing and are not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 10.024 Any loss and/or damage to the Property between the date of this Agreement and the date of Closing shall be Seller's sole risk and expense. XI. NOTICES 11.01 Any notice, request, demand, instruction or other communication to be given to either party hereunder shall be in writing, sent by facsimile with automated confirmation of receipt, or by registered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to Purchaser: Summer Araque, Coordinator Conservation Collier Program Collier County Parks and Recreation Division Public Services Department Golden Gate Community Park 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd. Naples, Florida 34116 With a copy to: Cindy M. Erb, SR/WA, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist Collier County Real Property Management 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102 Naples, Florida 34112 Telephone number: 239-252-8917 Fax number: 239-252-8876 If to Seller: Peter S. Sanchez and Nilsa E. Sanchez Revocable Living Trust 9174 SW 81 Court Ocala, FL 34481 Telephone number: 305-582-9878 Fax number: N/A 11.02 The addressees and numbers for the purpose of this Article may be changed by either party by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein. For the purpose of changing such addresses or addressees only, unless and until such written notice is received, the last addressee and respective address stated herein shall be deemed to continue in effect for all purposes. 8 1 () Packet Pg. 331 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 XII. REAL ESTATE BROKERS 12.01 Any and all brokerage commissions or fees shall be the sole responsibility of the Seller. Seller shall indemnify Purchaser and hold Purchaser harmless from and against any claim or liability for commission or fees to any broker or any other person or party claiming to have been engaged by Seller as a real estate broker, salesman or representative, in connection with this Agreement. Seller agrees to pay any and all commissions or fees at closing pursuant to the terms of a separate agreement, if any. XIII. MISCELLANEOUS 13.01 This Agreement may be executed in any manner of counterparts which together shall constitute the agreement of the parties. 13.02 This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors, successor trustee, and assignees whenever the context so requires or admits. 13.03 Any amendment to this Agreement shall not bind any of the parties hereof unless such amendment is in writing and executed and dated by Purchaser and Seller. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be binding upon Purchaser and Seller as soon as it has been executed by both parties. 13.04 Captions and section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only; in no way do they define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provisions hereof. 13.05 All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or number as the context or the use thereof may require. 13.06 No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to which it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as to such provision or a waiver as to any other provision. 13.07 If any date specified in this Agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, then the date to which such reference is made shall be extended to the next succeeding business day. 13.08 Seller is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 9 Packet Pg. 332 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 26.A.7 13.09 If the Seller holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the Property before Property held in such capacity is conveyed to Collier County. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.) 13.10 This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. XIV. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 14.01 This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain the entire agreement between the parties, and no promise, representation, warranty or covenant not included in this Agreement or any such referenced agreements has been or is being relied upon by either party. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing and executed and dated by both Purchaser and Seller. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed below. Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC: AS TO PURCHASER: ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Ronald T. Tomasko, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 10 WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., Chairman E t Packet Pg. 333 26.A.7 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 AS TO SELLER: DATED: —7 -7,/I,�L WITNESSES: (Sgnature (Printed ame) C>?-C— (Printed Name) } - _ l �� ignature) ct— (Printed Name) BY: Cl� ` PETER S. SANCHEZ AS CO- RUSTEE OF THE PETER S. SANCHEZ AND NILSA E. SANCHEZ REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, DATED JULY 21, 2015 BY: NILSA E. S NEZ\AS CO- TRUSTEE OF THE PETER S. SANCHEZ AND NILSA E. SANCHEZ REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, DATED JULY 21, 2015 11 GY.0 Packet Pg. 334 CONSERVATION COLLIER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39143120009 26.A.7 EXHIBIT "A" IIs] noIIIa[..29101a00]"If if� 011 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE EAST 180 FEET OF TRACT 32, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 47, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE(S) 32, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 2.73 acres Packet Pg. 335 26.A.9 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report S & 6 Properties 0. E. Gliles Owner Name: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 (0.50 acres) Staff Report Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 223/400 180 160 160 140 120 100 80 80 80 80 80 62 60 43 39 40 20 0 1- Ecological 2 - Human 3 - Restoration 4- Value Value and Vulnerability Management ■Awarded Points ❑Possible Points Packet Pg. 336 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview.........................................................................................................5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................8 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays....................................................9 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)...................................................... 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................12 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 12 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure 6 — Coastal scrub transitioning into maritime hammock .............................................. 15 Figure 7 — Southern boundary of parcel — coastal scrub transitioning into maritime hammock ................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected........................................................................................... 16 Figure 8 — Active gopher tortoise burrow in NE corner of property ........................................ 16 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 17 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness........................................................................... 18 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 11- CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 20 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 21 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 22 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 23 2 Packet Pg. 337 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 Figure 14 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 23 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 24 Figure 15 - Cultural/ Aesthetic Attribute Photo 1.................................................................... 24 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 25 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 25 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 25 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 25 Figure16 —Zoning ................................................................................................................... 26 Figure17 —Future Land Use.................................................................................................... 26 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 27 4. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................27 Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 27 5. Potential for Matching Funds.............................................................................................................. 27 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 28 7. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................34 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions ...................................... 38 3 Packet Pg. 338 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 1. Introduction Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 4 Packet Pg. 339 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 2. Summary of Property BARBAROSA CT else ORLEA NS CT N'�wAIl CT Annec y Barfield BEGONIA CT GALLEONAVE F, GALLEON CT MEDEIRACT m J a q q Q U p O Q ALMERIA CT MACAO CT O U Q O 2 7 S U N WINTERBERRYDR O )I-TS—Cj V� N �n nl OP ...CDR �CO cu, Jm MCI LVA! NtF CT a RMSAS CT O� m NpG S Cr C,_ . ti SiioR�s Cj' Qw 0 Chestnut ?gyp DEVON 26.A.9 Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 Legend - Application Received Cycle 10 parcel Ober Mound Preserve CON ATION LLIER y Co , County a w J Z O Ds GT �yY v� d stir' RO S & B Properties of Marco Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview o \z � ADDI ON CT m z OSCE.LA m �S INLET DR Agua Colina 0 I South Terra Corp 0 A 0.5 1 Miles 5 Packet Pg. 340 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.015 0.03 Miles S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC CONWMATION �y LLIER Co1ii-er County QW Figure 2 - Porcel Close-up N N O N M r N 7 7 Packet Pg. 341 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 Characteristic Value Comments Name S & B Properties S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number 58104160005 Address: 841 Scott Dr., Marco Island Target Protection Urban Marco Island Target Mailing Area Cycle 11 Area Size 0.50 acres Section, Township, and Range 517, Twn 52, R26 Zoning RSF-3, Residential RSF-3 maximum density is 3 units per gross acre Category/TDRs Single Family FEMA Flood Map X is Low flood risk and over most of the parcel; a small X and AE portion is AE - high -risk area having at least a 1/ annual Category chance of flooding Existing structures None Adjoining Residential, Single family residences to the north, east, and south and properties Undeveloped, roadway (Scott Dr.) to the west — with single family and their Uses roadway residences to the west of Scott Dr. Development Plans Submitted None Known Property None known Irregularities Other County Dept None Parcel is within unincorporated Collier Interest N N 0 N ri r N 7 Packet Pg. 342 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 200 160 150 100 50 43 0 1 - Ecological Value Total Score: 223/400 Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 80 80 80 80 62 39 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration 4 - Vulnerability and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 43 160 27% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 16 53 30% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 27 27 100% 1.3 - Water Resources 0 27 0% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 0 53 0% 2 - Human Values 39 80 48% 2.1 - Recreation 6 34 17% 2.2 - Accessibility 26 34 75% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 7 11 63% 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 55 55 100% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 23 23 100% 3.4 - Assistance 2 2 100% 4 - Vulnerability 62 80 78% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 58 58 100% 4.2 - Development Plans 4 22 20% Total 223 400 56% 8 Packet Pg. 343 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire the property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for the S & B Properties parcel, which has an initial valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject property and that appraisal report will determine the actual value of the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** S & B Properties of Marco 841 Scott Dr. 0.50 $203,207 $403,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the S & B Properties parcel was obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in June 2022. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcel is zoned Residential Single-Family-3. The maximum building density is 3 units per gross acre. 0 Packet Pg. 344 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Criteria 1: Native Habitats Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? YES Order of preference as follows: i. Hardwood hammocks No ii. Xeric oak scrub No iii. Coastal strand No iv. Native beach No V. Xeric pine No vi. Riverine Oak No vii. High marsh (saline) No viii. Tidal freshwater marsh No ix. Other native habitats YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 1: The parcel consists of Shrub / Brushland with the primary species being bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). Criteria 2: Human Social Values Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 2: This parcel is in the Urban Target Protection Area on Marco Island and has access from a public road. The parcel provides wildlife viewing and greenspace in a developed area. The parcel is too small to accommodate extensive trails but can be enjoyed from the sidewalk/road. Criteria 3: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? NO Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 3: The parcel does not significantly protect water resources. Criteria 4: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 4: The parcel contains many active gopher tortoise burrows. 10 Packet Pg. 345 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 Criteria 5: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? No Is this property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? No Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 5: There are no known conservation lands adjacent to this parcel. It abuts homes on the north, east, and south and a road to the west. 11 N N O N M N 7 Packet Pg. 346 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 The parcel consists primarily of dense bracken fern with muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), and some balsampear (Momordica charantia) mixed throughout. The parcel o appears to have been cleared and re -vegetated with bracken fern. Native trees and shrubs present 04 include gumbo limbo (Bursera simaruba), coastalplain staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa), sea grape ri y (Coccoloba uvifera), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), and cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto). Several large strangler figs (Ficus aurea) were also present along the eastern boundary. Air potato, and a in some instances bracken fern, was growing over and into all these trees and shrubs. as A large stand of Brazilian pepper exists within the southwest corner of the parcel. Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Hoopvine Trichostigma octandrum State Endangered n/a 12 Packet Pg. 347 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.125 0.25 Miles S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Priority 1 (highest) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Noturol Communities CONJ SEiRVATION COLLIE Ca er Couxty 13 Packet Pg. 348 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 T 0 0.0325 0.065 Miles S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC Land Cover Residential, Med. Density - 2-5 Dwelling Units/AC Transportation Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System El CONS AV ATION C LLIER Ga er C`.ouxty 14 Packet Pg. 349 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco a Figure 6 — View of parcel looking east Figure 7 — Strangler figs along eastern boundary Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 15 N N O N M r N 7 7 Packet Pg. 350 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities Multiple active gopher tortoise burrows were observed on the parcel. Strangler figs and seagrape on the parcel would also provide cover and forage for wildlife. Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Mode of Detection Gopherus Active burrow observed Gopher tortoise Threatened n/A polyphemus during site visit Figure 8 —Active gopher tortoise burrow on south side of parcel Figure 9 —Active gopher tortoise burrow in middle of parcel 16 N N O N ri N 7 3 Packet Pg. 351 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 26.A.9 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) CON rE-RVATION COLLIER Co ier Cauxty 17 N N O N M r to 7 i� 3 Packet Pg. 352 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.125 Miles S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC VALUE 1 species 2-4 species 5-6 species 7 species 8-13 species Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness 0.25 CONJ SEiRVATION COLLIE Ca er Couxty b. 18 Packet Pg. 353 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 3.1.3 Water Resources Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 The parcel does not significantly protect water resources, beyond adding very minimally to the surficial aquifer. The parcel and adjacent properties are comprised entirely of uplands. No wetlands exist on site, and the parcel is not within a wellfield protection zone. Soils data is based on the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida (USDA/NRCS, 1990). Mapped soils on this parcel show the majority of the site to be Paola Fine Sand, 1 to 8 pct slopes — an excessively drained soil found on coastal dunes on Marco Island. Soils along the western edge are mapped as Urban Land —Aquents Complex, Organic Substratum - consisting of materials that have been dug from different areas in the county and spread over muck soils for coastal urban development. 19 Packet Pg. 354 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.0325 0.065 Miles S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST Priority 2 - Priority 3 Priority 4 CONSE-rtvATION Priority 5 COLLIER Priority 6 C:a er C`.ouxty b: Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 20 Packet Pg. 355 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.0325 0.065 Miles S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC Soil Type PAOLA FINE SAND, 1 TO 8 POT SLOPES URBAN LAND-AQUENTS COMPLEX, ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey CONS-E-11-ATION C LLIER Ca er Comity 21 Packet Pg. 356 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco tr t, Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.0325 0.065 Miles S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC LIDAR Value High : 104.644 Low: -4.11745 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Mop CONUMATION LLIER Co or County 22 Packet Pg. 357 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity This parcel does not provide connectivity to other conservation lands. It is surrounded by Single -Family residences to the north, east, and south and a paved road (Scott Dr.) to the west. It is approximately 0.2 miles northeast of Otter Mound Preserve. 0 LU w J _Z OLDS GT O -7 �90 C9, ,jj � �P \�O ADDISON CT m z n -HElGNTS CT —� O U X til I I::.± S INLET DR F I 0 0.4 Miles - S & B PROPERTIES OF MARCO LLC Otter Mound Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Conservation Areas Figure 14 - Conservation Lands 0.8 CON ATION LLIER C_ ev CoHnty 23 Packet Pg. 358 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 3.2 Human Values Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 3.2.1 Recreation This parcel is bordered by a road along its entire western edge. Birdwatching and photography would be encouraged from the road right of way. Providing access to the parcel with a short trail would not be recommended due to the small size of the parcel and the sensitivity and density of the vegetation. 3.2.2 Accessibility The parcel would be visible from a public road. No pedestrian or vehicular access onto the parcel would be recommended. The parcel is within walking distance of many residences and street parking is available. Creating parking within the parcel would also not be recommended because of its small size, native vegetation, and wildlife utilization. If this parcel is acquired along with other parcels in the area, Conservation Collier will coordinate with the City of Marco Island regarding parking. Depending on location, the City of Marco Island has offered to assist in providing off-street parking on pervious material and the installation of signage consistent with the City's Land Development Codes. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement This parcel is in the Urban Target Protection Area on Marco Island and has access from a public road. The parcel provides wildlife viewing and greenspace in a neighborhood where nearly every lot is developed. The parcel is too small to accommodate trails but can be enjoyed from the side of the road Archaeological Site 8CR107 appears to encompass the entire subject parcel. The Caxambas Point Shell Midden (8CR107) is characterized as an extensive multi -component black -earth and shell midden site covering most of the Caxambas area, which dates to the Late Archaic Period (4950-2700 B.P.) and the Glades I Period (2700-1200 B.P.). Figure 15 — View of parcel and gopher tortoise burrow from Scott Dr. 24 N N O N ri N 7 Packet Pg. 359 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 3.3 Restoration and Management Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Approximately 25% of the parcel is covered with invasive vegetation — air potato throughout and Brazilian pepper along the north side. 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire The parcel contains bracken fern and tropical hardwood hammock trees, which would not be burned 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security No site security issues appear to exist within the parcel. Educational signage regarding the importance of the parcel for native wildlife could be installed to discourage trespass and littering. 3.3.3 Assistance Assistance with gopher tortoise monitoring on this parcel will be provided by the Audubon of the Western Everglades. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned RSF-3, Residential Single Family. Residential Single Family Districts are intended to be single-family residential areas of low density. Permitted uses include single-family dwellings, family care facilities (subject to the Land Development Code), and public parks and open space. The Future Land Use of the parcel is Low Density Residential — 0-4 units per acre. The lot is vulnerable to development for a home. 25 Packet Pg. 360 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco ZONING MAP CITY OF •' • ISLAND Legend a City L Ars CF, Rec/OperJGC/ST -.-� O—by Dixtrirts VC, Rec/Opcn/CC/ST ------- 5pe WTr Ia t P, Rec/Open/GC/5T O Parcels FUD, PU D Zoning RMF 12, AIu1tlI ® C-1/T', Commercial RMF. 16I O C•1, Crmlmercfal . RMF-6, PIu1b+amdy ® C•3, Commercial O RSF-2, Single Famlll - C-4, Commercial O RSF-3, SingIe Family C-a, Commercial o 111, 1,1 Family - A, Rec/Open/CCfSF RT, Resldenrisl Tourlsl Q CON, Rec/Opea/CC(ST O S &TIProperties ofI4 r T, C SCALE 1:1?,gNl 0 0.25 B.5 1 Md. dSCIAMEF Both the CNy o<Marco lsfartdantl U.a Olr 0 rtre CdW County Piopany AyP.aieer diyJa,m.any lanildy b� Ilte nfixmahon proe,ded Mren aritl do nel wairenl tlee ay or mnpetmew d 0.is irAame4m. Ap alaslpm,is brretereriw any. 2dtn9 i, r,( e dnenvYneat renew sne svLjeelm—ge. Figure 16 —Zoning CITY OF MARCO ISLAND FUTURE LAND USE MAP L840 { 1a;o FUTURE LAND USE LEGEND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL F—] VILLAGE COMMERCIAL 04 UNITS PER ACRE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - "UNITS PER ACRE HIGHDENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOWN CENTER I MIRED USE UNITS P 016 ACRE HEAVYCOMMERCIAL -RESORT I RESIDENTIAL 0-16 UNITS PER ACRE 0-26 HOTEUMOTEL UNITS PRESERVATION I CONSERVATION-Pnvale COMMUNITY FACILITY PRESERVATION l CONSERVATION - PUbic PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT S & B Properties Marco LLC N na.m�msw, oa me Gtyd .lamed rh_WM PUD edu�RDa�i�„�„m. rnacuQe aes+analeamNe IIY= FLUIupecweaaaopamid_aYd Mawl9emCamPehenw* dne��.mmmP",I, rwae�amm mm uw arp-eb y,P.nh,ra_aramed pan in - A ertw ai mr rme: rural app .1 eY G.,-1 osrzt 1 hwu Rr+":ea: mum, Figure 17 —Future Land Use Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 ov 26 Packet Pg. 361 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 3.4.2 Development Plans The parcel is not currently planned for development; however, its location near developed residential lots along a roadway makes it vulnerable to development. Although the gopher tortoises present on the parcel would make development cost prohibitive, development is still possible. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff has no Acquisition Considerations at this time. However, if the Advisory Committee has Considerations expressed during the review of the ICSR and/or the Ranking meeting, staff will carry those forward in the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners. 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Initial Annual Comments Element Cost Recurring Cost Invasive Vegetation $2,000 $500 Initial cost based on costs at Otter Mound Preserve Removal Native planting $4,000 Signage $5,000 $100 Educational signage and signage denoting the property as Conservation Collier preserve TOTAL $11,000 $600 If acquired staff would recommend replacement of some areas of bracken fern with other native species that are more desirable forage for gopher tortoise. Mature maritime hammock trees exist on the east boundary of the parcel which could be a foundation for possible restoration/creation of a maritime hammock community within the parcel. 6. Potential for Matching Funds The primary partnering agencies for conservation acquisitions, and those identified in the ordinance are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and The Florida Forever Program. The following highlights potential for partnering funds, as communicated by agency staff. Florida Communities Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program: The FCT Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program provides grant funds to local governments and nonprofit organizations to acquire conservation lands, urban open spaces, parks and greenways. Application for this program is typically made for pre -acquired sites up to two years from the time of acquisition. The Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program assists the Department of Environmental Protection in helping communities meet the challenges of growth, supporting viable community development and protecting natural resources and open space. The program receives 21 percent Florida Forever appropriation. 27 N N O N ri r N a� Packet Pg. 362 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 Florida Forever Program: Staff has been advised that the Florida Forever Program is concentrating on funding parcels already included on its ranked priority list. This parcel is not inside a Florida Forever priority project boundary. Additionally, the Conservation Collier Program has not been successful in partnering with the Florida Forever Program due to conflicting acquisition policies and issues regarding joint title between the programs. Additional Funding Sources: There are no additional funding sources known at this time. 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: S & B Properties of Marco Target Protection Mailing Area: Marco Island Fol io(s): 58104160005 Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points AwardedPercentage Points 1 - Ecological Value 160 43 27 2 - Human Value 80 39 48 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100 4 - Vulnerability 80 62 78 TOTAL SCORE 400 223 56 1 -ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible AwardedComments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 60 1.1.1- Priority natural communities (Select highest score) Contains a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Native trees Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal found in Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal 100 hammock Berm, 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - and coastal Maritime Hammock) upland, but no communities b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic Flatwoods) 60 c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 shrub / b. Parcel has S 2 CLC native plant communities 10 10 brushland 28 Packet Pg. 363 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 c. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 10 hoopvine d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 40 air potato; Brazilian pepper c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 100 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 gopher tortoise b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 20 high density of burrows b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 0 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 29 N N O N ri N 7 Packet Pg. 364 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 C. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 0 1.4.1- Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is >_ 300 acres 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 160 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 43 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 20 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 e. Equestrian 20 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 90 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) 30 Packet Pg. 365 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 25 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 adjacent to Scott Dr. d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 135 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 39 Possible Awarded 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Comments Points Points 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 120 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) Need to consider replacing100 a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 some bracken fern with other species 31 Packet Pg. 366 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to 75 restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore 50 and maintain native plant communities (>65%) d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting 25 necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire 20 20 dependent plant communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is 0 incompatible with prescribed fire 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 50 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 20 (Please describe) c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please 5 describe) d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 5 3.4.1- Management assistance by other entity Audubon of Western a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 5 Everglades gopher tortoise monitoring b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 175 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded 80 80 Points/Possible Points*80) Possible Awarded 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Comments Points Points 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 130 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or 100 100 commercial 32 N N O N ri N 7 Packet Pg. 367 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 C. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 10 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi -unit residential development 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 140 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 62 33 N N O N ri N 7 Packet Pg. 368 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco 8. Additional Site Photos y �9 A Y rrt Hoopvine surrounded by air potato and bracken fern Gumbo limbo and sea grape covered in air potato Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 34 Packet Pg. 369 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco m. R RR Brazilian pepper on north side of parcel Sabal palms within parcel 77N Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 35 Packet Pg. 370 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco View of parcel looking north — large covered mass is a gumbo limbo Strangler fig and air potato Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 36 N N O N M r N 7 3 Packet Pg. 371 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Drone photos of parcel Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 37 N N O N M r N 7 3 Packet Pg. 372 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58104160005 Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Date: August 3, 2022 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida N GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife N Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for r N acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative a, of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 a categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. y Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Fieure 4 - CLIP4 Prioritv Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Fieure 9. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Ma This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. 38 Packet Pg. 373 26.A.9 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: S & B Properties of Marco Folio Number: 58104160005 Date: August 3, 2022 Figure 17: CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in N the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department 0 N Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for y potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be a regulated under this section. 39 Packet Pg. 374 26.A.10 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report South Terra Corp 11 C - 1 Owner Name: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 (0.56 acres) Staff Report Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 253/400 200 160 150 100 72 80 80 80 62 80 50 39 0 1 - Ecological 2 - Human 3 - Restoration 4 - Vulnerability Value Value and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Packet Pg. 375 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview.........................................................................................................5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................8 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays....................................................9 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)...................................................... 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................12 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 12 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure 6 — Coastal scrub transitioning into maritime hammock .............................................. 15 Figure 7 — Southern boundary of parcel — coastal scrub transitioning into maritime hammock ................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected........................................................................................... 16 Figure 8 — Active gopher tortoise burrow in NE corner of property ........................................ 16 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 17 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness........................................................................... 18 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 20 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 21 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 22 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 23 2 Packet Pg. 376 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 Figure 14 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 23 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 24 Figure 15 - Cultural/ Aesthetic Attribute Photo 1.................................................................... 24 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 25 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 25 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 25 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 25 Figure16 —Zoning ................................................................................................................... 26 Figure17 —Future Land Use.................................................................................................... 26 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 27 4. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................27 Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 27 5. Potential for Matching Funds.............................................................................................................. 27 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 28 7. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................34 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions ...................................... 37 3 Packet Pg. 377 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp 1. Introduction Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 4 Packet Pg. 378 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp 2. Summary of Property BARBAROSA CT else ORLEA NS CT N'�wAIl CT Annec y Barfield BEGONIA CT GALLEONAVE F, GALLEON CT MEDEIRACT m J a q q Q U p O Q ALMERIA CT MACAO CT U U Q O 2 7 S U N WINTERBERRYDR O )I-TS—Cj V� N �n nl OP ...CDR �CO cu, Jm MCI LVA! NtF CT a RMSAS CT O� m NpG S CT C,_ . ti SiioRs O' Qw 0 Chestnut ?gyp DEVON 26.A.10 Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 Legend - Application Received Cycle 10 parcel Ober Mound Preserve CON ATION LLIER y Co , County a w J Z O Ds GT v� d stir' RO S & B Properties of Marco Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview o \z � ADDI ON CT m z OSCE.LA m �S INLET DR Agua Colina 0 I South Terra Corp 0 A 0.5 1 Miles 5 Packet Pg. 379 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.0125 0.025 AM SOUTH TERRA CORP CONWMATION �yy LLIER Collier County =_ Figure 2 - Porcel Close-up N N O N M N 7 IM 3 Packet Pg. 380 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 Characteristic Value Comments Name South Terra Corp Folio Number 58105440009 Address: 1125 Caxambas Dr., Marco Island Target Protection Urban Marco Island Target Mailing Area Cycle 11 Area Size 0.56 acres Section, Township, and Range S17, Twn 52, R26 Zoning RSF-3, Residential RSF-3 maximum density is 3 units per gross acre Category/TDRs Single Family FEMA Flood Map X is Low flood risk and over most of the parcel; a small X and AE portion is AE - high -risk area having at least a 1/ annual Category chance of flooding Existing structures None Adjoining properties Undeveloped, Undeveloped property to the north and south, canal to the west, and roadway (Caxambas Dr.) to the east — with a and their Uses roadway, canal single family residence to the east of Scott Dr. Development Plans Submitted None Known Property Known The Caxambas Point Shell Midden archaeological site Irregularities archaeological site (8CR107) encompasses the entire subject parcel. Other County Dept None Parcel is within unincorporated Collier Interest 2 Packet Pg. 381 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 253/400 180 160 160 140 120 100 80 80 80 80 80 72 62 60 39 40 20 0 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and 4 - Vulnerability Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1- Ecological Value 72 160 45% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 40 53 75% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 27 27 100% 1.3 - Water Resources 5 27 20% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 0 53 0% 2 - Human Values 39 80 48% 2.1 - Recreation 6 34 17% 2.2 - Accessibility 26 34 75% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 7 11 63% 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 55 55 100% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 23 23 100% 3.3 - Assistance 2 2 100% 4 - Vulnerability 62 80 78% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 58 58 100% 4.2 - Development Plans 4 22 20% Total 253 400 63% n. Packet Pg. 382 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire the property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, two appraisals are required for the South Terra Corp property which has an initial valuation greater than $500,000; 2 independent Real Estate Appraisers will value the subject property and the average of the two appraisal reports will determine the actual value of the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** South Terra Corp 1125 Caxambas Dr. 0.56 $674,268 $1,975,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the South Terra Corp parcel was obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in July 2022. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcel is zoned Residential Single-Family-3. The maximum building density is 3 units per gross acre. 0 Packet Pg. 383 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Criteria 1: Native Habitats Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? YES Order of preference as follows: i. ii. Hardwood hammocks Xeric oak scrub No YES iii. Coastal strand No iv. Native beach No V. Xeric pine No vi. Riverine Oak No vii. High marsh (saline) No viii. Tidal freshwater marsh No ix. Other native habitats No Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 1: Approximately half the parcel consists of vegetation consistent with Coastal Oak Scrub. Criteria 2: Human Social Values Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 2: This parcel is in the Urban Target Protection Area on Marco Island and has access from a public road. The parcel provides wildlife viewing and greenspace in a developed area. The parcel is too small to accommodate extensive trails but can be enjoyed from the road. Additionally, there are significant cultural features in this area of Marco Island. There is evidence of a shell midden dating back 1500 years which is of importance both aesthetically and culturally to Collier County. Criteria 3: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? NO Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 3: The parcel does not significantly protect water resources. Criteria 4: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? YES 10 Packet Pg. 384 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 4: The parcel contains many active gopher tortoise burrows. Criteria 5: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands N through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? No N M Is this property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? No a Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 5: There are no known conservation lands adjacent to this parcel. It abuts undeveloped land to the north and south, a canal to the west, and a roadway (Caxambas Dr.) to the east. 11 Packet Pg. 385 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 The northern half of the parcel consists primarily of disturbed coastal scrub, containing sand live oak N (Quercus geminata) and pricklypear (Opuntia mesacantha). Cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto), Gumbo N limbo (Bursera simaruba), wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa), American beautyberry (Callicarpa M americana), tough bully (Sideroxylon tenax), and thick coinvine (Dalbergia ecastaphyllum) are also present. The southern half of the parcel is cleared with a few small, scattered oaks and cabbage palms. a Exotic plants present include Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), guineagrass (Urochloa maxima), Mother-in-law's tongue (Dracaena hyacinthoides), and life plant (Kalanchoe pinnata). Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Giant wild pine Tillandsia utriculata State Endangered n/a Cardinal air plant Tillandsia fasciculata State Endangered n/a 12 Packet Pg. 386 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 o� q� 16, 5 ,� ADDISON CT T- fl F w J _Z LU I 0 0.15 0.3 Miles SOUTH TERRA CORP CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Priority 1 (highest) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Noturol Communities CONJ SEiRVATION COLLIE Ca er Couxty b. 13 Packet Pg. 387 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp 1 0 0.0225 Miles SOUTH TERRA CORP Land Cover Cultural - Estuarine Residential, Med. Density - 2-5 Dwelling Units/AC Transportation Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 0.045 N N O N M to 7 7 21 CONSEIY ATION C LLIER Ca er Couxty .: V"', � aef' 14 Packet Pg. 388 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Figure 6 — Coostol scrub Figure 7— Cleared southern half of property Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 15 Packet Pg. 389 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities Multiple active gopher tortoise burrows were observed on the parcel. Native plant communities on the parcel would also provide cover and forage for wildlife. Table S — Listed Wildlife Detected Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Mode of Detection Gopherus Active burrow observed Gopher tortoise Threatened n/A polyphemus during site visit Figure 8 —Active gopher tortoise burrow on south side of parcel 16 N N O N M a� Packet Pg. 390 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp R A O Cis , m.k yy 26.A.10 Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 F 4 ,cY J fff Yn4 . � ri I` 0 0.05 0.1 Miles Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) 17 Packet Pg. 391 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 0� q� e9 s0 5 + OAP? ADD ISON CT F w J _Z l� I, 0 0.15 0.3 Miles SOUTH TERRA CORP VALUE 1 species 2-4 species 5-6 species 7 species 8-13 species Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness CONJSEiRVATION COLLIER Collier County 18 Packet Pg. 392 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.3 Water Resources The parcel does not significantly protect water resources, beyond adding very minimally to the surficial aquifer. The parcel and adjacent properties are comprised entirely of uplands. No wetlands exist on site, and the parcel is not within a wellfield protection zone. However, the parcel is adjacent to the canal, so conservation of the property in lieu of a house would benefit water quality. N Soils data is based on the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida (USDA/NRCS, 1990). Mapped soils 0 M on this parcel show the majority of the site to be Urban Land — Aquents Complex, Organic Substratum - consisting of materials that have been dug from different areas in the county and spread over muck soils for coastal urban development. Soils along the eastern edge are mapped as Paola Fine Sand, 1 to 8 pct a slopes — an excessively drained soil found on coastal dunes on Marco Island. 19 Packet Pg. 393 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 I 0 0.0275 0.055 Miles SOUTH TERRA CORP Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST _M Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 CONSE-R ATION Priority 5 �, � COMER Priority 6 Cotlter County b. Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 20 Packet Pg. 394 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp T 1 , 0 0.0225 Miles SOUTH TERRA CORP Soil Type PAOLA FINE SAND, 1 TO 8 POT SLOPES URBAN LAND-AQUENTS COMPLEX, ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM - WATER Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 0.045 CONSEfY ATION C LLIER Ca er Comity .:�. 21 Packet Pg. 395 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.0225 0.045 Miles SOUTH TERRA CORP LIDAR Value High : 104.644 Low: -4.11745 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Mop CON .Eft:: ATION C LLIER Co ev County 22 Packet Pg. 396 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity This parcel does not provide connectivity to other conservation lands. It is surrounded by undeveloped land to the north and south, a canal to the west, and a paved road (Caxambas Dr.) to the east. It is approximately 0.2 miles east of Otter Mound Preserve. a 0 w J Z OLDS GT O `Y- P z LUDLOW RD "C'LVAlNECT 41 O ,27 jz :�E ADDISON CT CIO m rn 2 n HEIGHTS CT n U ti S INLET DR AL I 0 0.4 0.8 Miles - SOUTH TERRA CORP " Otter Mound Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Conservation Areas dlt4tw CONS-E-RVATION F COLLIER Ca ev County V Figure 14 - Conservation Lands 23 Packet Pg. 397 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp 3.2 Human Values Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 3.2.1 Recreation This parcel is bordered by a road along its entire eastern edge. Birdwatching and photography would be encouraged from the road right of way. Providing access to the parcel with a short trail would not be recommended due to the small size of the parcel and the sensitivity of the vegetation and gopher tortoise burrows. 3.2.2 Accessibility The parcel would be visible from a public road. No pedestrian or vehicular access onto the parcel would be recommended. The parcel is within walking distance of many residences and street parking is available. Creating parking within the parcel would also not be recommended because of its small size, native vegetation, and wildlife utilization. If this parcel is acquired along with other parcels in the area, Conservation Collier will coordinate with the City of Marco Island regarding parking. Depending on location, the City of Marco Island has offered to assist in providing off-street parking on pervious material and the installation of signage consistent with the City's Land Development Codes. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement This parcel is in the Urban Target Protection Area on Marco Island and has access from a public road. The parcel provides wildlife viewing and greenspace in a neighborhood where nearly every lot is developed. The parcel is too small to accommodate trails but can be enjoyed from the side of the road Archaeological Site 8CR107 encompasses the entire subject parcel. The Caxambas Point Shell Midden (8CR107) is characterized as an extensive multi -component black -earth and shell midden site covering most of the Caxambas area, which dates to the Late Archaic Period (4950-2700 B.P.) and the Glades I Period (2700-1200 B.P.). Additionally, significant prehistoric and historic cultural resources were uncovered within the adjacent property to the north of this parcel. It is highly likely that significant cultural resources also exist on the South Terra Corp parcel. Figure 15 — View of parcel looking north 24 Packet Pg. 398 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Approximately 25% of the parcel is covered with invasive vegetation — 50% of the vegetated portion Brazilian pepper and mother -in-laws tongue is quite thick in some areas. 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire Prescribed fire would not be a necessary component of managing this parcel. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security No site security issues appear to exist within the parcel apart from minimal littering. Educational signage regarding the importance of the parcel for native wildlife could be installed to discourage trespass and littering. 3.3.3 Assistance Assistance with gopher tortoise monitoring on this parcel will be provided by the Audubon of the Western Everglades. N N 0 N M a� 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned RSF-3, Residential Single Family. Residential Single Family Districts are intended to be single-family residential areas of low density. Permitted uses include single-family dwellings, family care facilities (subject to the Land Development Code), and public parks and open space. The Future Land Use of the parcel is Low Density Residential — 0-4 units per acre. The lot is vulnerable to development for a home. 25 Packet Pg. 399 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Legend O (11y limit, CF. Rec/C'PeWGC/5T ---- Orrerlay Districts C+C. Rae/Open/Cfi/ST ------- Sp[ w]Tmatrnmt . F. Rec/OPep/GC/ST I� P.Cds PUP, FM ZOntng . 11INP-I2, Muld-Family ® C-I/T. Comm ,M l R1aIF-16, Muid-Family. o C-1, Commercial . RMF-6, MWU-Famtly C.3. CBnunelcial a RSF-2, Singlc Family . C-S, Commercial O RSF-T, Stngle Family 0 C.S, CBm y dm o ASF-y Single Family - A, Ref/OPeu/GC/SF - RT, Residential Tourist o CON, Rec/OP.VGC/ST O South Tears Corp SCArE 1:12,OIm 0 0.25 0.5 1 MOea DISCLAIMER Boil taa CI ofMww II tp Olrim ofte Co%v Cowry PmpwWAplxaiew AIe JeYn my mh,I V b, um neenrafm poriara harem end m ale auaaacy or mrip%Ib�¢®d Ms uJtrSNBon. N+rfam�6an slvwn h br ratwwiw Wy 2.mnp niamnem t omeMh, uW w renew anu autism m mange. Figure 16 — Zoning CITY OF MARCO ISLAND FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE LEGEND F7LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE COMMERCIAL 04 UNITS PER ACRE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL Q6 UNITS PERACRE pEN53TY RCSIpEN73AL TOWN CENTER I MIXED USE -HIGH 0-16 UNITS PER ACRE HEAVYCOMMERCIAL -RESORT I RESIDENTIAL .6 HOTELI OTEL U Q26 HOTEVMOTELUNITS PRESERVATION f CONSERVATION - Ptivale COMMUNITY FACILITY PRESERVATION f CONSERVATION - Public PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT South Terra Corp N a a neaMa�sl aPwMasP�o regesern eriztirg Rennes Una Oereloprtenn. The P11p'e cnlne Clys FLUMapeteaea aoopeon Of r°- l A A n,a[ea �QtyM �cbraere _ was mn dam vgnu�e�e grLowm „anaga,eb,tt punio ¢n¢q sl tlw 4meAlhe�4nal aparwal. N AeaPma ar c7 cwnal: oarztnnm MaP Rcnaea', Or1TT/Z00) Figure 17 —Future Land Use Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 4 26 Packet Pg. 400 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 3.4.2 Development Plans The parcel is not currently planned for development; however, its location near developed residential lots along a roadway makes it vulnerable to development. Although the gopher tortoises present on the parcel would make development cost prohibitive, development is still possible. N 4. Acquisition Considerations N Staff has no Acquisition Considerations at this time. However, if the Advisory Committee has N Considerations expressed during the review of the ICSR and/or the Ranking meeting, staff will carry those forward in the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners. a 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Initial Annual Comments Element Cost Recurring Cost Invasive Vegetation $2,000 $500 Initial cost based on costs at Otter Mound Preserve Removal Native planting $4,000 Signage $5,000 $100 Educational signage and signage denoting the property as Conservation Collier preserve TOTAL $11,000 $600 If acquired staff would recommend planting the southern half of the parcel with native species that are desirable forage for gopher tortoise. 6. Potential for Matching Funds The primary partnering agencies for conservation acquisitions, and those identified in the ordinance are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and The Florida Forever Program. The following highlights potential for partnering funds, as communicated by agency staff. Florida Communities Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program: The FCT Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program provides grant funds to local governments and nonprofit organizations to acquire conservation lands, urban open spaces, parks and greenways. Application for this program is typically made for pre -acquired sites up to two years from the time of acquisition. The Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program assists the Department of Environmental Protection in helping communities meet the challenges of growth, supporting viable community development and protecting natural resources and open space. The program receives 21 percent Florida Forever appropriation. Florida Forever Program: Staff has been advised that the Florida Forever Program is concentrating on funding parcels already included on its ranked priority list. This parcel is not inside a Florida Forever priority project boundary. Additionally, the Conservation Collier Program has not been successful in 27 Packet Pg. 401 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 partnering with the Florida Forever Program due to conflicting acquisition policies and issues regarding joint title between the programs. Additional Funding Sources: There are no additional funding sources known at this time. 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: South Terra Corp Target Protection Mailing Area: Marco Island Fol io(s): 58105440009 Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points AwardedPercentage Points 1 - Ecological Value 160 72 45 2 - Human Value 80 39 48 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100 4 - Vulnerability 80 62 78 TOTAL SCORE 400 253 63 1 -ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible AwardedComments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 150 1.1.1- Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal NW portion Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal 100 100 is coastal Berm, 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - scrub Maritime Hammock) b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic Flatwoods) 60 c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 coastal b. Parcel has S 2 CLC native plant communities 10 10 scrub; remnant hammock c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 28 Packet Pg. 402 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 C. Parcel has S 2 CLC listed plant species 10 Tillandsia fasciculata and utriculata d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 100 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 gopher tortoise b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 20 large gopher tortoise population b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 20 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 29 N N O N ai am Z4 Packet Pg. 403 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 0 1.4.1- Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is >_ 300 acres 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 270 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 72 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 20 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 e. Equestrian 20 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 90 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 30 N N 0 N M a� 2 Packet Pg. 404 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 25 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 135 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 39 Possible Awarded 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Comments Points Points 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 120 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) Will also a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to need to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 100 plant cleared area b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 31 2 Packet Pg. 405 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting 25 necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire 20 20 dependent plant communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is 0 incompatible with prescribed fire 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 50 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 20 (Please describe) c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please 5 describe) d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 5 3.3.1- Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 5 AWE gopher tort b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 175 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded 80 80 Points/Possible Points*80) 4 -VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible AwardedComments Points Points 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 130 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 32 N N 0 N M a� Packet Pg. 406 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 10 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi -unit residential development 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 140 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 62 33 N N 0 N ai am Packet Pg. 407 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp 8. Additional Site Photos Tough bully Prickly pear Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 34 Packet Pg. 408 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Coinvine with Brazilian pepper in background Guineagrass Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 35 N N O N M N 7 IM 3 Packet Pg. 409 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 58105440009 Owner Names: South Terra Corp Date: August 3, 2022 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida N GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife N M Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for N acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 a categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Fieure 4 - CLIP4 Prioritv Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Fieure 9. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Ma This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. 37 Packet Pg. 411 26.A.10 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: South Terra Corp Folio Number: 58105440009 Date: August 3, 2022 Figure 17: CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in N N the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department M Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be a regulated under this section. a) 38 Packet Pg. 412 26.A.11 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report Van Cleave Parcel -1 F1' ;: 1.1iles Owner Name: Matthew VanCleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Size: 0.5 acre Staff Report Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 173/400 200 150 160 100 80 80 64 80 50 41 36 32 0 1 - Ecological 2 - Human Value 3-Restoration 4-Vulnerability Value and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Packet Pg. 413 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview.........................................................................................................5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................9 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays....................................................9 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)...................................................... 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................12 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure 6 — Swamp fern and cabbage palm under Brazilian pepper ......................................... 15 Figure 7 —Wild coffee, cabbage palm, and java plum.............................................................. 15 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 16 Table 4 — Listed Wildlife Detected........................................................................................... 16 Figure 8 — Typical view of understory...................................................................................... 16 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 17 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness........................................................................... 18 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 20 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 21 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 22 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 23 Figure14 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 23 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 24 2 Packet Pg. 414 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 24 Figure 15 — Large laurel oak on eastern edge of parcel........................................................... 24 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 25 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 25 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 25 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 25 Figure16—Zoning................................................................................................................... 26 Figure17—Zoning Overlay...................................................................................................... 27 Figure18 — Future Land Use................................................................................................... 28 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 29 4. Acquisition Considerations................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 19 - Debris including bucket, flower pots, glass and plastic bottles, empty quart oil containers andChristmas lights.............................................................................................................................. 30 Figure20 - Old Septic Tank.................................................................................................................... 30 5. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................31 Table 5 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 31 6. Potential for Matching Funds..............................................................................................................31 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 32 8. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................38 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions......................................41 3 Packet Pg. 415 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave 1. Introduction Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 4 N N O N v Packet Pg. 416 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave 2. Summary of Property U) U) O Q S L) W SUNDANCE ST CANNON BLVD DRAGON Lei VanCleave Offer Accepted Rivers Road Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 IMMOKALEE RD RAMSEY ST 7) G 0.5 Miles O C r 0 m O CANNON BLVD KEPI ISLAND RD 1 CON E-R ATION LLIER C liter C01414cy � r S N N O N M r rn 3 3 Q N N r E E O U 21, N Q C O r .N v Q C R J 00 0 M N d R N U c ca N U M Q ti r C d E t V R r r Q Packet Pg. 417 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Miles VanCleave EW Rivers Road Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 2 - Porcel Close-up El CONIMWATION QW.LLIER Collier Cvicer"Ity Packet Pg. 418 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 Characteristic Value Comments Name Van Cleave Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number 00218840007 Address: 2065 Rivers Rd., Naples Target Protection RFMUD Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Receiving Area Size 0.50 acres Section, Township, and Range 530, Twn 48, R27 Zoning AMHO-RFMUD- 1 unit per acre with TDR credits and 0.2 units per acre (1 Category/TDRs Receiving unit per 5 acres) without TDR credits. 1% annual chance of shallow flooding, usually in the form FEMA Flood Map of a pond, with an average depth ranging from 1 to 3 feet. Category AH These areas have a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. Existing structures None Adjoining Residential, Single family residences to the south and west, properties Undeveloped, undeveloped parcel to the north, unpaved road (Rivers Rd.) and their Uses roadway, preserve to the east — with Rivers Road Preserve east of Rivers Rd. Development Plans Submitted None Known Property Septic tank and Old septic tank and well associated with trailer that had Irregularities well present been removed; some debris Other County Dept Interest None N N 0 N v r 3 El Packet Pg. 419 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 173/400 180 160 160 140 120 100 80 80 80 80 64 60 41 40 36 32 20 0 1- Ecological 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration 4 - Vulnerability Value and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 41 160 26% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 3 53 5% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 19 27 70% 1.3 - Water Resources 7 27 25% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 13 53 25% 2 - Human Values 36 80 45% 2.1 - Recreation 11 34 33% 2.2 - Accessibility 20 34 58% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 4 11 38% 3 - Restoration and Management 32 80 40% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 23 55 42% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 9 23 40% 3.4 - Assistance 0 2 0% 4 - Vulnerability 64 80 81% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 58 58 100% 4.2 - Development Plans 7 22 30% Total 173 400 43% n. Packet Pg. 420 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, N utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or N comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information r solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. a If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire the property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for the Van Cleave parcel, which has an initial valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject property and that appraisal report will determine the actual value of the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** Matthew Van Cleave 2065 Rivers Rd. 0.50 $25,000 $35,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the Van Cleave parcel was obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in July 2022. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcel is zoned Agricultural with Mobile Home Overlay (A -MHO) but is Receiving Land within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD). The maximum building density is 1 dwelling unit per acre with redemption of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) credits and 0.2 units per acre (1 unit per 5 acres) without redemption of TDR credits. 0 Packet Pg. 421 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Criteria 1: Native Habitats Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: NO i. Hardwood hammocks No ii. Xeric oak scrub No iii. Coastal strand No iv. Native beach No V. Xeric pine No vi. Riverine Oak No vii. High marsh (saline) No viii. Tidal freshwater marsh No ix. Other native habitats No Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 1: The parcel consists primarily of Brazilian pepper with some scattered native and other exotic species Criteria 2: Human Social Values Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 2: This parcel has access from and can be viewed from a public road, with a large laurel oak adjacent to road. Trails on the parcel could be incorporated into existing Rivers Road Preserve trails. Criteria 3: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? NO Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 3: Although the eastern edge of the property does hold some water after rain events, the parcel does not significantly protect water resources. Criteria 4: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 4: The parcel is adjacent to Rivers Road Preserve and is most likely utilized by the Florida panther. 10 Packet Pg. 422 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Criteria 5: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? YES Is this property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? No Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 5: There are no known conservation lands adjacent to this parcel. It abuts homes on the west and north, a road to the east, and undeveloped land to the south. 11 N N O N v r El Packet Pg. 423 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities Although the southeastern half of the parcel is mapped as hydric pine flatwoods, it consists primarily of mature Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), containing scattered native plants and other exotics. The canopy contains some scattered cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto) and cypress (Taxodium distichum), N c with one red maple (Acer rubrum), one pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), and one large laurel oak N v (Quercus laurifolia) along the eastern edge. Other plants observed in the midstory and groundcover include cabbage palm, wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa), myrsine (Myrsine cubana), swamp fern a (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum), shoestring fern (Vittoria lineata), golden polypody (Phlebodium , aureum), St. Johns wort (Hypericum sp.), and St. Augustingrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum). m Brazilian pepper covers over 75% of the parcel. Other non-native plant species present include java plum (Syzygium cumini), caesarweed (Urena lobata), bamboo and grapefruit (Citrus x aurantium). No listed plant species were observed. 12 Packet Pg. 424 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Miles Van Cleave CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Priority 1 (highest) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities El CONSEA ATION COLLIER Goer County 13 Packet Pg. 425 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Miles Van Cleave Land Cover Hydric Pine Flatwoods Other Hardwood Wetlands Residential, Low Density Transportation Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System El CONJC SEiRVATION OLLIER Ca ev Ceuxty b. 14 Packet Pg. 426 �v 45,y�� r� IV, 17 °mot• < sr NA g 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities No wildlife was observed within the parcel; however, a swallowtail kite (Elanoides forficatus) was present above the parcel. Florida panther and Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) are commonly observed in the properties surrounding the parcel. Table 4 — Listed Wildlife Detected Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Mode of Detection Puma concolor Game camera on Florida panther Endangered Endangered coryi adjacent parcels Figure 8 — Typical view of understory 16 N N O N v El Packet Pg. 428 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave SIESTA BAY D R EN� IAVE Uj 26.A.11 Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 � o a GO O m w ❑ Q N�Ct'�7CT �'� z U) Rj Of Y o AKSCN 0 - U 1MMOKALEE RD w Q O NO NAME LN c r v L o m v N �0 rYPRESS DR CANNON BLVD CALUSq PINES DR M . AL KEF v a a.a 1 2 Miles Van Cleave (� Bald Eagle Nests Florida Panther Mortality Q Florida Panther Telemetry Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) I CON E-12�ATION COLLIER C:o er Couyety 17 Packet Pg. 429 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Van Cleave VALUE 1 species 2-4 species 5-6 species 7 species 8-13 species Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness � I N N O N v r to 7 7 El CON ATION LLIER C,.o er C.oxxty RK Packet Pg. 430 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.3 Water Resources The parcel does not significantly protect water resources, beyond adding very minimally to the surficial aquifer. The parcel and adjacent properties are comprised nearly entirely of uplands. Wetlands exist on the very eastern edge, where water occasionally accumulates during the rainy season. Soils data is based on the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida (USDA/NRCS, 1990). Mapped soils on this parcel show the entire site to be non-hydric Boca Fine Sand fine sand — a poorly drained soil found on flatwoods. 19 N N O N v r El Packet Pg. 431 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 26.A.11 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Van Cleave Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST Priority 2 - Priority 3 Priority 4 [ Priority 5 [ Priority 6 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones N N O N v r N 7 7 El CON R ATION LLIER ,4 20 Packet Pg. 432 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Van Cleave Soil Type BOCA FINE SAND Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey ti I N N O N v r to 7 i� 7 El CON ,R ATION LLIER Co er Couxty 21 Packet Pg. 433 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Van Cleave LIDAR Value High : 104.644 Low: -4.11745 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Mop N N O N v r N 7 7 CONSEitWATION ��,, COLLIER Cotirer County «',. 22 Packet Pg. 434 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity This parcel expands the Rivers Road Preserve which protects a wildlife corridor that connects the Golden Gate Estates to the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed. This corridor is utilized by a variety of animals including umbrella species such Florida panther and black bear. 0 0 0 Z z N SIESTA BAY DR m v O w o tiQ ZCl) 04 J m LU _ V } m o Lij r 1 m O ¢ 3 i� IMMOKALEE RD 3 r= J 24THAVE NWUj Q m 0 0 NO NAME LN N � r r O R � 22ND AVE NWU Mo 0 Cf m �E0 x X CYPRESS DR CALUA O PINES T 20TH AVE NW (=) 0 X au l� 7 0 �r o 0 18TH AVE NW U) MINGO DR JUNG BLVD W 16THAVE NW r- KERI ISLAND RD p r .N NSHADY LN 4TH AVE NW a m Q 12THAVE NW 4 Cl) J -j SANBORNAVE 0 10TH AVE NW LL w CD M O VANDERBILT BEACH RD d 0 0.5 1 2 m Miles V Van Cleave Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve > Conservation Areas U M Q ti r c e-ONUMATION d LLIER E t COS` , -Y rC a+ a+ Q Figure 14 - Conservation Lands 23 Packet Pg. 435 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 3.2 Human Values 3.2.1 Recreation This parcel is bordered by a road along its entire eastern edge. Birdwatching and photography would be encouraged from the road right of way and a short trail for hikers and horseback riders through the parcel that connects to existing Rivers Road Preserve trails could be possible. 3.2.2 Accessibility The parcel would be visible from a public road. Year-round access would be available. Creating parking within the parcel would not be necessary because a Rivers Road Preserve parking area already exists less than 750 feet to the south. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement This parcel has access and is visible from an unpaved road and has a large laurel oak visible from the road. The parcel would expand Rivers Road Preserve in an area of the County that is rapidly developing. Figure 15 — Large laurel oak on eastern edge of parcel 24 N N 0 N v r Packet Pg. 436 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Over 75% of the parcel is covered with invasive vegetation — primarily Brazilian pepper. Other non- native, invasive plants are scattered throughout the parcel including java plum and caesarweed. Non- native bamboo and a grapefruit tree were also observed in the northeast and southwest corners of the N parcel, respectively. N v r 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire N 3 Once the Brazilian pepper is removed from the parcel, prescribed fire would be beneficial but unlikely a due to its small size and proximity to homes. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security No site security issues appear to exist within the parcel. A septic tank associated with a trailer no longer on the parcel would need to be removed/crushed and the well associated with the trailer located and capped (if not capped already). Scattered debris piles will also need to be removed. Historically, dumping occurred within the parcels along Rivers Road. The scattered debris does not appear recent but appears to be associated with this historic dumping. 3.3.3 Assistance Assistance from other agencies or organizations is not anticipated. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned A -MHO but is Receiving Land within the RFMUD. The maximum building density is 1 dwelling unit per acre with redemption of TDR credits and 0.2 units per acre (1 unit per 5 acres) without redemption of TDR credits. The area around this parcel is rapidly developing, as the urban area expands eastward. Although many species of plants and wildlife can thrive in low -density residential environments, undeveloped patches of habitat serve as crucial refugia 25 Packet Pg. 437 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Miles Van Cleave Zoning General A -MHO Figure 16 —Zoning N N O N v r N 7 7 El CON ATION 26 Packet Pg. 438 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Miles Van Cleave Zoning Overlay RFMUO-RECEIVING Figure 17—Zoning Overlay N N O N M a+ N 7 7 El CONSERVATION C LLIER Ca ier County �-:�'. 27 Packet Pg. 439 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 Van Cleave Future Land Use Agricultural 1 Rural Designation RF-Receiving Figure 18 — Future Land Use N N O N v r N 7 7 CON ATION LLIER co iev Gounty . 28 Packet Pg. 440 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 3.4.2 Development Plans The parcel is not currently planned for development; however, its location within receiving lands and near developed residential lots along a roadway makes it vulnerable to development. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following items may not have significantly affected the scoring but are worth noting. A septic tank associated with a trailer no longer on the parcel would need to be removed/crushed and the well associated with the trailer located and capped (if not capped already). Minor dumping was also uncovered during the site visit to the property. This scattered debris will also need to be removed Historically, dumping occurred within the parcels along Rivers Road. The scattered debris does not appear recent but appears to be associated with this historic dumping. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment would be recommended as part of the due diligence associated with acquiring this parcel, and staff recommends that the old septic tank be remediated by the seller. Staff does not believe the septic tank and debris should preclude this parcel from acquisition as these issues can be remediated. The area around this parcel is rapidly developing, as the urban area expands eastward, and acquiring this parcel would increase the size of Rivers Road Preserve. 29 N N O N v r El Packet Pg. 441 %4 31% A�.ATNih li��tg'�'� .-��'ir��'V�, � b��f1, d,.,` %' y� L,�.i1Qv.4 �h•a -r �, Y A• M-4 � � �� ♦ 3 s � � � /'� 'f Y �� tl fie. U ' �� , � � .0 , a► V� •U .�ra �a '�` �ii� 7r // �, /,J r �� \ `e. .►SOL v 4 ��.• ii::� I , 4 `% ;.•,( -" •�...:` `' �- +-. •. �� mod-. �'�. _ r _I;-x, J M 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 5 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Initial Annual Comments Element Cost Recurring Cost Invasive Vegetation $5,000 $1,000 Initial assumes cut and remove based on previous costs Removal Septic Tank $1,000 n/a Would be difficult to remediate prior to exotic plant removal Remediation Signage $500 $100 Educational signage and signage denoting the property as Conservation Collier preserve TOTAL $6,500 $1,100 6. Potential for Matching Funds The primary partnering agencies for conservation acquisitions, and those identified in the ordinance are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and The Florida Forever Program. The following highlights potential for partnering funds, as communicated by agency staff. Florida Communities Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program: The FCT Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program provides grant funds to local governments and nonprofit organizations to acquire conservation lands, urban open spaces, parks and greenways. Application for this program is typically made for pre -acquired sites up to two years from the time of acquisition. The Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program assists the Department of Environmental Protection in helping communities meet the challenges of growth, supporting viable community development and protecting natural resources and open space. The program receives 21 percent Florida Forever appropriation. Florida Forever Program: Staff has been advised that the Florida Forever Program is concentrating on funding parcels already included on its ranked priority list. This parcel is not inside a Florida Forever priority project boundary. Additionally, the Conservation Collier Program has not been successful in partnering with the Florida Forever Program due to conflicting acquisition policies and issues regarding joint title between the programs. Additional Funding Sources: There are no additional funding sources known at this time. 31 N N 0 N v 3 a� El Packet Pg. 443 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 Property Name: Van Cleave Target Protection Mailing Area: Rivers Road Preserve Folio(s): 00218840007 Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points AwardedPercentage Points 1 - Ecological Value 160 41 26 2 - Human Value 80 36 45 3 - Restoration and Management 80 32 40 4 - Vulnerability 80 64 81 TOTAL SCORE 400 173 43 1 -ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible AwardedComments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 10 1.1.1- Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal 100 Berm, 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) Brazilian b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine pepper with Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic Flatwoods) 60 remnant Cabbage Palm community c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 b. Parcel has S 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 0 Brazilian pepper 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 c. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 32 N N O N v r N 3 a� El Packet Pg. 444 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 No listed d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 0 plants observed 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 Primarily BP, e. >_75% infestation 10 10 some java plum, and bamboo 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 70 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 Florida b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 60 panther in area c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please adjacent to describe) 10 10 Rivers Road Preserve c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 25 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 33 N N O N v 3 a� 3 El Packet Pg. 445 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 15 eastern edge of parcel e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 eastern edge of parcel holds water c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 50 1.4.1 - Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is >_ 300 acres 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 0 0.5 acres 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 50 Rivers Road Preserve b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 155 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 41 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 40 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 e. Equestrian 20 20 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 70 34 N N O N v 3 a� El Packet Pg. 446 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 20 c. Street parking available 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 15 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 5 Large laurel oak near road b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 adjacent to Rivers Road d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 125 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 36 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 50 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 35 N N 0 N v r a� El Packet Pg. 447 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 Native seed source prevalent and C. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore adjacent, so50 and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 re -planting not anticipated after exotic treatment d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 25 e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire 20 dependent plant communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is Single family incompatible with prescribed fire 0 0 homes to N and W 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 20 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 Septic tank will need to b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted be removed (Please describe) 20 20 or crushed. Some garbage piles need to be removed c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 5 d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 0 3.4.1 - Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 70 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded 80 32 Points/Possible Points*80) 36 N N 0 N v r a� El Packet Pg. 448 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 130 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or RFMUD- commercial 100 100 Receiving b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 C. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 15 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWM and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 Many multi- d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or residential multi -unit residential development 5 5 developments within 1 mile VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 145 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 64 37 N N O N cl a� 3 El Packet Pg. 449 a x� or. i` i � xr �i F Atcal l Nk 'Z 4 � t• t �ce' ilA w s �, r r 4CAS. e 4 •� •y;- / 0.4 as�a- iJ tip! 'FV, L ;,i Y � r''35 lj1„ �kIlk � .' �'� � 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00218840007 Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Date: August 3, 2022 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife N 0 Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for N v acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative N of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for a natural resource conservation. Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Fieure 4 - CLIP4 Prioritv Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Fieure 9. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Ma This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. 41 Packet Pg. 453 26.A.11 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Names: Matthew Van Cleave Folio Number: 00218840007 Date: August 3, 2022 Figure 17: CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department iz c Staff. The public water sapply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWM for M potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as v, protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. a 42 Packet Pg. 454 26.A.12 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report County Barn Trust Parcel Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 (5.0 acres) Staff Report Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 200/400 180 160 160 140 120 100 80 80 80 80 ui' 57 60 60 40 20 16 0 1 - Ecological 2 - Human Value 3-Restoration 4-Vulnerability Value and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Packet Pg. 455 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview.........................................................................................................5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................9 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays....................................................9 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)...................................................... 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................12 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 12 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure 6 — Slash pine with melaleuca and earleaf acacia......................................................... 15 Figure 7 —Typical understory on western half of parcel......................................................... 15 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 — Potential Listed Wildlife........................................................................................... 16 Figure 8 — Typical view of understory...................................................................................... 16 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 17 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness........................................................................... 18 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 20 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 21 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 22 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 23 Figure 14 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 23 2 Packet Pg. 456 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 24 Figure 15 —View inside middle of parcel................................................................................. 24 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 25 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 25 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 25 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 25 Figure16 —Zoning ................................................................................................................... 26 Figure17 — Future Land Use................................................................................................... 27 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 28 4. Acquisition Considerations................................................................................................................... 28 5. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................29 Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 29 6. Potential for Matching Funds.............................................................................................................. 29 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 30 8. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................36 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions......................................40 3 Packet Pg. 457 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust 1. Introduction Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 4 Packet Pg. 458 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust 2. Summary of Property WILMAR LN COPE CREWS RD WENDY LN LANDSDALELNITJ z z 1> Z (n in J co Z D u❑i DUU UU D Zl J z w CU °o 0 i WHITAKER RD ��R ROYAL WOOD BLVD CRANBROOK WAY O C, m MAPLEWOOD LN m KNOTWOOD LN �A0 !2 m IVYWOOD LN z a 9sy, N �y GLENWOOD LN M m O,L z O"` DRIFTWOOD LN O Zd APPLETREELN O U i County Barn Land Trust Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 Z q b r m Go ADKINSAVE ❑ POLLY AVE EVERETT S HOLLOW DR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD 0.5 Miles Y T U) SEPMOX, PARKERS HAMMOCK RD PARKERS HAMMOCK RD 1 CON ATION LLIER Co*e-r County 5 Packet Pg. 459 Vw- I, HIM a-. iLiLpY" VA tow Aliv 0 5w� ' •'�:. y� ��y .� r 'fit 'G.� v -: ,� i`� � '" _ 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 Characteristic Value Comments Name County Barn Land Trust Folio Number 00406600509 Target Protection Urban Within the County Barn Target Protection Mailing Area Area Size 5.0 acres Section, Township, and Range Sec 8, Twn 50, R 26 Zoning Estates - CU 1 unit per 2.25 acres — Conditional Use for a church Category/TDRs 1% annual chance of shallow flooding, usually in the FEMA Flood Map form of a pond, with an average depth ranging from 1 Category AFi to 3 feet. These areas have a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. Existing structures None observed Adjoining Undeveloped PUD, Undeveloped PUD to the north, religious development properties Institutional, and to the west, Collier County Fleet complex to the south, and their Uses Conservation Easement and Conservation Easement to the east Development Plans Submitted None Known Property No road access 30' access easement exists to on northern portion and Irregularities to County Barn Road Other County Dept None known Interest N N O N M a� Packet Pg. 461 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 200/400 180 160 160 140 120 100 80 80 80 80 67 57 60 60 40 2 16 0 0 1 - Ecological 2 - Human Value 3-Restoration 4-Vulnerability Value and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 67 160 42% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 27 53 50% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 19 27 70% 1.3 - Water Resources 8 27 30% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 13 53 25% 2 - Human Values 16 80 20% 2.1 - Recreation 6 34 17% 2.2 - Accessibility 10 34 29% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 0 11 0% 3 - Restoration and Management 57 80 71% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 34 55 63% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 23 23 100% 3.3 - Assistance 0 2 0% 4 - Vulnerability 60 80 75% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 58 58 100% 4.2 - Development Plans 2 22 10% Total 200 400 50% n. Packet Pg. 462 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire the property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for the County Barn Land Trust parcel, which has an initial valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject property and that appraisal report will determine the actual value of the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** County Barn Land Trust No site address 5.0 $350,000 $432,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the County Barn Land Trust parcel was obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in July 2022. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcel is zoned Estates which allows 1 unit per 2.25 acres and has a Conditional Use that would allow the development of a church on the parcel. 0 Packet Pg. 463 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Criteria 1: Native Habitats Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: YES i. Hardwood hammocks No ii. Xeric oak scrub No iii. Coastal strand No iv. Native beach No V. Xeric pine No vi. Riverine Oak No vii. High marsh (saline) No viii. Tidal freshwater marsh No ix. Other native habitats YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 1: The parcel contains hydric pine flatwoods. Criteria 2: Human Social Values Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? NO Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 2: This parcel is within the Urban area but is not visible or accessible from a public road. Criteria 3: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 3: The parcel contains wetlands, holds water during the wet season, and adds in flood control of nearby properties. Criteria 4: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 4: The parcel is adjacent to private conservation lands to the east and contains habitat that could support the Big Cypress fox squirrel. 10 Packet Pg. 464 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 Criteria 5: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? YES N N O Is this property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? No N cli Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 5: The parcel is adjacent to private conservation lands on ; its east side and provides and enhances an area of undeveloped land within a section of the Q County that is rapidly being developed. 11 Packet Pg. 465 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities N The parcel is comprised of hydric pine flatwoods containing exotics at an approximate 50% density. The o canopy consists primarily of slash pine (Pinus ellioti) with some cypress (Taxodium distichum), dahoon M holly (Ilex cassine), swamp bay (Persea palustris), and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia). Mid -story and groundcover vegetation includes myrsine (Myrsine cubana), cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto), coco plum (Chrysobalanus icaco) wax myrtle (Morelia cerifera), wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa), saw palmetto Q (Serenoa repens), swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum), sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) is the densest along the northern boundary. Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) are the most prevalent exotic species in the canopy. Other exotic plant species present include java plum (Syzygium cumini), downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), and old-world climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum), Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Cardinal airplant Tillandsia fasciculata Endangered n/a 12 Packet Pg. 466 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust LL County Barn Land Trust CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Priority 1 (highest) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Noturol Communities 0.05 Miles Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 0.1 N N O N M N 7 C1 7 CONJ SEiRVATION COLLIE Ca er Couxty b. 13 Packet Pg. 467 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 Miles County Barn Land Trust Land Cover Commercial and Services Cypress Hydric Pine Flatwoods Institutional Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System N N O N cM N 7 C1 7 CONJ SEiRVATION COLLIE Collier County 14 Packet Pg. 468 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities Red -bellied woodpeckers (Melanerpes carolinus) were detected within the parcel, and an osprey (Pandion haliaetus) was present above the parcel. Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), and Big Cypress fox squirrel are commonly observed in the properties surrounding the parcel, and Florida panther telemetry points from 2013, 2014, and 2015 were captured on adjacent properties. Although a female panther and kittens were recently photographed within the Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve approximately 1.5 miles SE of this parcel, it is unlikely that Florida panthers will continue to inhabit this quickly developing region of the County. Table 5 — Potential Listed Wildlife Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Mode of Detection Big Cypress Fox Sciurus niger Threatened N/A Observed on other Squirrel avicennia properties in the area Florida panther Puma concolor Endangered Endangered Telemetry points on coryi adjacent parcels Figure 8 — Typical view of understory 16 N N 0 N M a� Packet Pg. 470 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 Miles Figure 9 - Wildlife Spotiol Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) N N O N M N 7 a1 7 El 17 Packet Pg. 471 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 0 0.075 0.15 Miles County Barn Land Trust VALUE 1 species - 2-4 species 5-6 species i 7 species 8-13 species Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness N N O N M to 7 C1 7 CON ,R ATION MER Co er Couxty 18 Packet Pg. 472 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust 3.1.3 Water Resources Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 The parcel adds only very minimally to the surficial aquifer, but is comprised of 100% wetlands and holds water during the rainy season, aiding in flood attenuation for surrounding properties and providing habitat for wetland species. Soils data is based on the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida (USDA/NRCS, 1990). Mapped soils on this parcel show the site consists primarily of hydric Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum — a poorly drained soil found in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. 19 Packet Pg. 473 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 Miles County Barn Land Trust Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 � Priority 6 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones • �, 20 N N O N M N 7 C1 7 Packet Pg. 474 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 Miles County Barn Land Trust Soil Type BOCA FINE SAND PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE `` SUBSTRATUM URBAN LAND Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey N N O N M r to 7 7 El CONJSEiRVATION C LL1ER Ca er Couxty b, 21 Packet Pg. 475 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust n County Barn Land Trust LIDAR Value High : 104.644 Low :-4.11745 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Mop 0.05 Miles Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 0.1 r , LA 22 Packet Pg. 476 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity This parcel expands the Conservation Easements and undeveloped parcels to the east.. FOXHOUND GLE DR m DAVIS BLVD i z l • (!i � � �I � � -G < m "a r Y Of w �y y Q co MA ITR NO CIR N �U J 0 4 Fr�y I- F a co m �? r F to BUCKINGHAM I U L) LN O Q O g J COPE LN ( m WILMARLN a > Z u> J m CY CREWS RD W Z Z < z Y � z � 0 CHARLEMAGNE BLVD Z w 0 w WHITAKER RD CYNTHIA LN�— N MARSEILI F- DR - o m O Z, O O Q � m � OC z O T otia� COTTONWOOD LN APPLETREELN ( �, 0.5 1 Miles County Barn Land Trust rattlesnake Hammock Preserve Conservation Areas Figure 14 - Conservation Lands ADKINSAVE POLLY AVE EVERETT ST Y — OW DR PARKERS HAMMOCK RD PARKERS HAMMOCK RD 011 CON .'-RdATION # C LLIEIt CiU [1-, C---ty 23 Packet Pg. 477 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust 3.2 Human Values Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 3.2.1 Recreation This parcel is not accessible to a road, but an access easement does exist on the north side west to County Barn Road. A trail could be created to the parcel from the road. Only passive natural resource - based recreation such as hiking, photography, and birdwatching would be possible on the parcel. 3.2.2 Accessibility Seasonal access during the dry season would be available on the parcel. Major improvements and wetland impacts would be necessary to provide on -site parking, including improvements to approximately 650 feet of access easement from County Barn Road to the parcel. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement This parcel is not visible from a public road and is difficult to access. It does not contain any noteworthy features that would make it aesthetically or culturally significant. Figure 15 — View inside middle of parcel 24 Packet Pg. 478 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Approximately 50% of the parcel is covered with invasive vegetation — primarily melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and Brazilian pepper. Other non-native, invasive plants are scattered throughout the parcel including java plum, downy rose myrtle, and old-world climbing fern. The densest Brazilian pepper exists along the southern boundary 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire Although prescribed fire would be beneficial within this parcel, it is unlikely due to its small size and urban location. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security No site security issues appear to exist within the parcel. 3.3.3 Assistance Assistance from other agencies or organizations is not anticipated. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned Estates but also contains a Zoning Exception and is identified as P.U.E., CU. The maximum building density in Estates lots is 1 dwelling unit per 2.25 acres. Although many species of plants and wildlife can thrive in low -density residential environments, undeveloped patches of habitat serve as crucial refugia. 25 Packet Pg. 479 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600S09 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 Miles County Barn Land Trust Zoning General E P PUD RPUD Figure 16 —Zoning N N O N M to 7 C1 7 CONS-E-RWATION C� LLIER Co ier County' 26 Packet Pg. 480 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 aIII rM County Barn Land Trust Future Land Use Residential Density Bands Urban Residential Subdistrict Figure 17— Future Land Use CONSL-RVATION C LLILR C.oi[6r C.ouxty Wr ,. 27 N N O N M to 7 Cl 7 Packet Pg. 481 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 3.4.2 Development Plans The parcel is not currently planned for development. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following items may not have significantly affected the scoring but are worth noting. The area around this parcel is rapidly developing and acquiring this parcel would increase the size of adjacent protected land within this area of the County. Although many species of plants and wildlife can thrive in low -density residential environments, undeveloped patches of habitat serve as crucial refugia. Acquisition of this parcel would be primarily for habitat preservation, not public access. 28 N N O N M Packet Pg. 482 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Element Initial Cost Annual Recurring Cost Comments Invasive Vegetation $5,000 $1,000 Initial assumes treat in place based on previous costs Removal TOTAL $5,000 $1,000 A parking lot would not be recommended, as impacts to the preserve would outweigh the benefits of having a parking lot. 6. Potential for Matching Funds The primary partnering agencies for conservation acquisitions, and those identified in the ordinance are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and The Florida Forever Program. The following highlights potential for partnering funds, as communicated by agency staff. Florida Communities Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program: The FCT Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program provides grant funds to local governments and nonprofit organizations to acquire conservation lands, urban open spaces, parks and greenways. Application for this program is typically made for pre -acquired sites up to two years from the time of acquisition. The Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program assists the Department of Environmental Protection in helping communities meet the challenges of growth, supporting viable community development and protecting natural resources and open space. The program receives 21 percent Florida Forever appropriation. Florida Forever Program: Staff has been advised that the Florida Forever Program is concentrating on funding parcels already included on its ranked priority list. This parcel is not inside a Florida Forever priority project boundary. Additionally, the Conservation Collier Program has not been successful in partnering with the Florida Forever Program due to conflicting acquisition policies and issues regarding joint title between the programs. Additional Funding Sources: There are no additional funding sources known at this time. 29 N N O N ri a� Packet Pg. 483 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 Property Name: County Barn Land Trust Target Protection Mailing Area: County Barn Folio(s): 00406600509 Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points AwardedPercentage Points 1 - Ecological Value 160 67 42 2 - Human Value 80 16 20 3 - Restoration and Management 80 57 71 4 - Vulnerability 80 60 75 TOTAL SCORE 400 200 50 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 100 1.1.1- Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal 100 Berm, 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Hydric pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic Flatwoods) 60 60 flatwoods c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 b. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 10 Hydric pine flatwoods c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 c. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) 30 N N O N ri a� Packet Pg. 484 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 Melaleuca, C. 25 - 50% infestation 30 30 BP, earleaf, Java Plum, lygodium d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 70 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 Florida panther, Big b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 60 Cypress fox squirrel nearby c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 Very little b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please vegetated describe) 10 10 cover left in this area c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 30 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) 31 N N 0 N ri a� Packet Pg. 485 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 0 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 50 1.4.1- Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is > 300 acres 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 50 CE on east side b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 250 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 67 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1- RECREATION 120 20 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 e. Equestrian 20 32 N N O N ri a� Packet Pg. 486 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 35 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year round 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 0 easement to access parcel 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 0 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 55 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 16 Possible Awarded 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Comments Points Points 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 75 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) 33 N N O N M a� Packet Pg. 487 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to 25-50% restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 75 coverage C. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 25 e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire 20 dependent plant communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is 0 0 location not conducive to incompatible with prescribed fire fire 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 50 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) some a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 50 scattered litter present b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 20 (Please describe) c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 5 d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 0 3.3.1- Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 125 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded 80 57 Points/Possible Points*80) Possible Awarded 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Comments Points Points 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 130 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or 100 100 commercial b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 34 N N 0 N ri a� Packet Pg. 488 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, 25 Agriculture c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship 5 Area d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 5 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has-been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP 15 application has been submitted c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or 5 5 multi -unit residential development VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 135 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 60 35 N N 0 N ri a� Packet Pg. 489 i i fr a ki J t 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Cardinal air plant on slash pine Brazilian pepper on south side of property Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 Cardinal air plant on cypress 37 Packet Pg. 491 � S > r 1� - a, � 1 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Wheelbarrow on western boundary Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 Typical understory on western half South side of property as viewed from County Fleet complex N N O N M N 7 C1 7 39 Packet Pg. 493 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Number: 00406600509 Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Date: August 3, 2022 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a N CD collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida N GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife N Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for a, acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative Q of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. c Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Fieure 4 - CLIP4 Prioritv Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Fieure 9. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Ma This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. 40 Packet Pg. 494 26.A.12 Initial Criteria Screening Report Owner Name: County Barn Land Trust Folio Number: 00406600509 Date: August 3, 2022 Figure 17: CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. 41 N N O N ri Packet Pg. 495 26.A.13 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report Gore TPMA 0 0.5 1 Miles Dr Robert H. Gore Preserve TPMA Conservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending Appraisal Pending Application Received 1 - Berman Trust (1.14 ac) 2 - Trigouaa (1.14 ac) 3 - Perez (1.17 ac) 4 - Mack (2.27 act CON�ATION LLIER G,i!-fur G�unLl' Target Protection Area Parcels and Acreage: 167 parcels (424.18 ac) Application Parcel Owner: Berman Trust (41508680004), Trigoura (41507440009), Perez (415606000006), Mack (415057560002) Staff Report: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 262/400 o 200 12 60 5480 48 80 40 80 0 100 MRf ] 1 - Ecological 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration 4 - Vulnerability Value and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Packet Pg. 496 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview.........................................................................................................5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................9 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays....................................................9 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)................................. 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................11 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 11 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure6 — Cypress/Tupelo....................................................................................................... 15 Figure 7 — Mixed Wetland Hardwoods.................................................................................... 15 Figure 8 — Mixed Shrub/Scrub Wetlands................................................................................. 16 Figure 9 —Transportation ........................................................................................................ 16 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 17 Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Species............................................................................................. 17 Figure 10 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................. 18 Figure 11- CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness........................................................................... 19 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 12 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 21 Figure 13 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 22 Figure 14 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 23 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 24 Packet Pg. 497 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 Figure 15 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 25 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 26 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 26 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 26 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 27 Figure 16—Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve Hiking Trail........................................................... 27 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 27 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 27 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 27 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 27 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 27 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 28 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 28 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 28 Figure17—Zoning................................................................................................................... 29 Figure18—Future Land Use.................................................................................................... 30 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 31 4. Acquisition Considerations..................................................................................................................31 5. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................31 Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 31 5. Potential for Matching Funds.............................................................................................................. 31 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 32 7. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................38 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions......................................40 Packet Pg. 498 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 1. Introduction The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board re -authorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. Packet Pg. 499 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 2. Summary of Property 0 0.5 1 Miles Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPMA Conservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending Appraisal Pending Application Received 1 - Berman Trust (1.14 ac) 2 - Trigoura (1.14 ac) 3 - Perez (1.17 ac) 4 - Mack (2.27 ac) Figure 1 - Porcel Location Overview CONS-E-R VAT 1 O N COLLIER Cai r County Packet Pg. 500 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 0 0.5 1 Miles Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA Conservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending Appraisal Pending Application Received 1 - Berman Trust 2 - Trigoura 3 - Perez 4 - Mack Figure 2 - Parcel Close-up CON ATION LLIER Co er County Packet Pg. 501 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 Characteristic Value Comments Name Multiple Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number 167 Parcels Target Protection Gore Area Size 424.18 total acres Section, Township, 533, T49S, R28E Section 33, Township 495, Range 28E and Range Zoning Category/TDRs E Estates AH, with some AH and AE- Area close to water hazard that has a one FEMA Flood Map small areas AE and percent chance of experiencing shallow flooding between Category X500 one and three feet each year. X500 — low flood risk Existing structures none TPA parcels are adjacent to existing Dr. Robert H. Gore III Conservation, Preserve parcels, Cypress Cove Landkeepers parcel, limited Adjoining properties Residential, residential inholdings, Desoto Blvd and i-75, and bordered and their Uses Easement and on the east by conservation easement and the Florida roadway Panther National Wildlife Refuge and south by Picayune Strand State Forest. Development Plans Submitted None Known Property None known Irregularities Other County Dept None known Interest N N 0 N r� am 2 a a� L ,O V 2 0 W Packet Pg. 502 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack 180 160 140 120 100 EY9: 60 40 20 0 160 1 - Ecological Value Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 262/400 80 80 54 48 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary 80 40 4 - Vulnerability Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1- Ecological Value 120 160 75% 1.1-Vegetative Communities 32 53 60% 1.2- Wildlife Communities 24 27 90% 1.3 - Water Resources 11 27 40% 1.4- Ecosystem Connectivity 53 53 100% 2 - Human Values 54 80 689,o' 2.1- Recreation 23 34 67% 2.2 - Acce ss i b i I i ty 27 34 79% 2.3-Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 4 11 38% 3 - Restoration and Management 48 80 60% 3.1-Vegetation Management 23 55 42% 3.2- Remediation and Site Security 23 23 100% 3.4 - Assistance 2 2 100% 4- Vulnerability 40 80 50•/0 4.1-Zoning and Land Use 33 58 58% 4.2- Development Plans 71 221 30% Total 2621 4001 669,16 Q Packet Pg. 503 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparable used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire this property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for each of the Gore parcels, which have an initial valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject properties and that appraisal report will determine the actual value of the subject properties. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed Value Estimated Value Berman Trust No address 1.14 $10,545 $24,000 Trigoura No address 1.14 $10,545 $24,000 Perez No address 1.17 $7,254 $25,000 Mack No address 2.27 $20,998 $53,000 TOTAL 5.72 $49,342 $126,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the Gore parcels were obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in July 2022. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcels arezoned Estates which allows 1 unit per 2.25 acres. N N O N a� a a� 0 0 x as 0 W Packet Pg. 504 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Criteria 1: Native Habitats Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: i. Hardwood hammocks No ii. Xeric oak scrub No iii. Coastal strand No iv. Native beach No V. Xeric pine No vi. Riverine Oak No vii. High marsh (saline) No viii. Tidal freshwater marsh No ix. Other native habitats Yes Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 1: Other native habitats include Cypress, Cypress- Mixed Hardwoods, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods, Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland, Pine Flatwood. Criteria 2: Human Social Values Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 2: These parcels are in North Golden Gate Estates. They have access from four public roads: Desoto Blvd., 38th Ave. SE, 40th Ave. SE and 42nd Ave. SE. Desoto is paved road, both 38th Ave. SE and 40th Ave. SE are unpaved but passable by vehicle. Forty-second Ave. SE, which runs north of 1-75, is not passable by vehicle. The southern -most parcels abut the 1-75 canal and are within the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 1-75 right of way but are not visible from 1-75. Properties could accommodate seasonal outdoor recreation with some clearing for trails. Criteria 3: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 3: Hydric soils exist on just over 81% of the parcels; wetland indicators noted and numerous wetland dependent plants species noted. Criteria 4: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 4: FWC telemetry shows use by panthers. Habitat for Florida bonneted bats and Everglades snail kites. Packet Pg. 505 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 Criteria 5: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Yes Is this property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? No Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 5: Parcels will enhance the Dr. Robert Gore III Preserve. Parcels are within a historic wetland that connects with the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) to the east; however, they are separated by Desoto and the old Harley Davidson Test Track. Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF) is located across 1-75 to the south and Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve to the SE across I-75. Wildlife edges under Miller and FakaUnion canals connect to PSSF. MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ❑Yes ❑No The property satisfies 5 initial screening criteria 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities Characterization of Plant Communities present: Native plant communities that make up the TPA parcels as indicated through the Cooperative Land Cover Classification System and ground and aerial observations include: Cypress, Cypress- Mixed Hardwoods, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods, Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland, Pine Flatwood. Ground Cover: Ground cover species observed bidens (Bidens alba), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum L.), morning- glory (Ipomoea sagittata Poir), sweet acacia (Vachellia farnesiana) and various epiphytic ferns Midstory: Midstory species included beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), marlberry (Ardesia escallonioides), wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa and P. sulzneri), myrsine (Myrsine floridana), Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), pond apple (Annona glabra), and buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis). Canopy: The canopy for most of the parcels consists of, in order of abundance, a mix of cypress (Taxodium distichum) cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto), red maple (Acer rubrum), bay (Persea sp.), and slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Laurel oak (Quercus Iaurifolia) were also observed in various areas. In depressional areas, pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana) was observed. As a result of historic efforts to develop the Golden Gate Estates and habitat alterations that reduced the hydroperiod, some parcels within the TPA have transitioned to pine flatwoods with upland vegetation in the understory. In general, the condition of the on -site native plant communities varied from moderate to poor as a result of the consistent infestation level throughout each community type by invasive, exotic plant species. The native plant communities found throughout the TPA, while heavily impacted by exotics feature mature native trees and a diverse midstory and understory where native plants species occur. Because of this persistence of a rich diversity Packet Pg. 506 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 of native plant species throughout the impacted communities found within the preserve, restoration forecasts are optimistic following intensive efforts to kill and remove the exotic plant species dominating the landscape. Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Butterfly orchid Encyclia tempensis CE n/a Twisted airplant Tillandsia flexuosa T n/a common wild pine Tillandsia fasciculata T n/a reflexed wild pine Tillandsia balbisiana T n/a giant air plant Tillandsia utriculata E n/a N N O N M a� Z74 M a F- a� L ,O V 2 0 W Packet Pg. 507 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA uwner Names: Berman 1 rust, 1 rigoura, verez, ivlacK 24THAVE SE 24THAVE S_E 26TH AVE SE 26TH AVE�SE 28TH AVE SE 28TH AVE SE 30TH AVE SE 30TH AVE SE Cn O `n (n 32ND AVE SE 32ND AVE SE m w O O O J (n 34TH AVE SE 34TH AVE SE o w w 36TH AVE 36TH AVE SE 8. AAUEE SE ,I 1 38TH AVE SEA� I 1 4TAV_ _,E,S.E 4 42ND AVE SE 3 75 48TH AVE SE 48TH AVE SE Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 0 0.5 1 Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA Conservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending Appraisal Pending Q Application Received CLIP4 Priority Natural 1 - Berman Trust Communities 2 - Trigoura 3 - Perez Priority 1 (highest) 4 - Mack Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities 2 Miles 175 1-75 Packet Pg. 508 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 0 0.5 1 Miles Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland Conservation Collier Preserve Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Donation Rural Open -- Offer Pending Rural Structures '. Appraisal Pending Strand Swamp Q Application Received Transportation Land Cover Wet Flatwoods Basin Marsh Wet Prairie Canal Cypress Cypress/Tupelo(inci Cy1Tu mixed) Cons ATION Dome Swamp 1 - Berman Trust MER Low Intensity Urban 2 - Trigoura Co er Coxxty Mesic Hammock 3 - Perez Mixed Hardwood Coniferous Swamis Mack Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System Packet Pg. 509 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Figure 6 — Cypress/Tupelo Figure 7 — Mixed Wetlond Hardwoods Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 N N O N M N 3 Im 3 Z74 M a F- a� L ,O V 2 0 W Packet Pg. 510 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Figure 8 — Mixed Shrub/Scrub Wetlands Figure 9 — Transportation st 3, 2022 N N O N M N 3 Im 3 Z74 M a F- a� L ,O V 2 0 w Packet Pg. 511 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities As a result of this regional connectivity, Florida panther, Florida black bear, wild turkey, white-tailed deer, spotted skunk, bobcat, grey fox, red-headed woodpeckers, and coyote are commonly sighted on the wildlife cameras located throughout the existing Gore Preserve lands. As the parcels within the Gore TPA are adjacent or in close proximity to the acquired lands, it is reasonable that the TPA parcels would provide similar habitat for species observed on preserve lands. Table 5 details imperiled species that are likely found or have been observed utilizing the parcels within the Gore TPA. Figure 10 provides a reference to the intensive utilization of the TPA by the Federally Endangered Florida panther. Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Species Common Name Scientific Name Status Observation Documented American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis FT (S/A) Yes Audobon's crested caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT Within 2 miles Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST No Cassius blue butterfly Leptotes cassius theonus FT (S/A) No Ceraunus blue butterfly Hemiargus ceraunus antibubastus FT (S/A) No Eastern indigo snake Dymarchon corais couperi FT No Everglade snail kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus FE Within 3 miles Everglades mink Neovison vison evergladensis ST Within 10 miles Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE Within 5 miles Florida panther Puma Felis concolor coryi SE Yes Florida sandhill crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Yes Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Within 2 miles Little blue heron Egretta caerulea ST Yes Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE Within 5 miles Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Yes Sherman's short -tailed shrew Blarina shermani ST No Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor ST Yes Wood stork Mycteria americana FT Yes FE= Federally Endangered, FT= Federally Threatened, FT (S/A) = Federally Threatened for Similar Appearance, SE= State Endangered, ST = State Threatened, N N O N M a� Z74 M a F_ a� `0 x a� 0 W Packet Pg. 512 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 A A A Q A 00 � LIL z�, 0 A L, 0 5 0� 0 Q 36TTHHH AVE SE 0 A Q Q 5 �QO 0 0 0� 0�� 0� 0 0 36THAVE 7 � 0 0 O C o Cn o 2 Q 0 40THAVE SE Q 4 0 0 'LL 0 3 0 0 A a 0 42ND AVE SE / Z�\ 175 175 1-75 Q 0 0.5 1 Miles - Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA Conservation Collier Preserve Florida Panther Telemetry Florida Panther Mortality Donation Offer Pending Q Appraisal Pending Application Received 1 - Berman Trust 2 - Trigoura 3 - Perez CON rvATI ON pLLI E R t 4 - Mack ca e� coanty �; A �.S Figure 10 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) N N O N M N 3 Q m E 0 U N a 0 N .3 Q c J ti O O M N Q d H 0 2 a� 0 L C U LO ti C N t V 2 r Q Packet Pg. 513 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA 26.A.13 Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 JWner Names: Berman I rust, I rlgoura, f erez, ivlacK uaie: August J, LULL ■ �■� ■ 9 ■ 36,TH AVE SE h j ■o I 3 L■ � 38THAVE SE + M LU ■ 1- a l A 2 ■ 4flTHAVE SE r �� 4 ■ �i 3 42ND AVEISE � M i 175 1-75 175 0 0.5 Miles I Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA QConservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending 1 - Berman Trust Appraisal Pending 2 - Trigoura Q Application Received 3 - Perez 4 - Mack VALUE 1 species 2-4 species 5-6 species 7 species 8-13 species Figure 11 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness CO • MI F, • r Packet Pg. 514 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.3 Water Resources This parcel provides moderate recharge of the surficial aquifer. Surface water pooling and storage throughout the wet season are observed in the depressional cypress sloughs, roadside swales, and seasonal ponds that make up the wetlands throughout the TPA. Changes to the regional hydrology through the installation of roadways, swales, and the Faka-Union canal have facilitated a significant infestation of the native plant communities by exotic, invasive plant species. As a result of these hydrologic manipulations, areas noted on the map as freshwater forested wetlands have been observed to remain dry throughout the wet season. Wetland dependent wildlife species such as wood stork, little blue heron, and roseate spoonbill have been observed utilizing the seasonally flooded wetlands throughout the TPA. Soils data is based on the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida (USDA/NRCS, 1990). Mapped soils on this parcel show the TPA to be comprised of 67% Boca and Hallandale Fine Sand. These soils are hydric, very poorly drained and found in depressions, swamps, and marshes. Typical vegetation includes wax myrtle and maidencane. 33% of the area is comprised of Boca, Riviera depressional soils. These soils are hydric, very poorly drained and found in depressions, swamps, and marshes. Typical vegetation includes cypress, pickerel weed, and alligator flag. Packet Pg. 515 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 36TH AVE SE 175 T 1 Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA Mk Priority 3 © Conservation Collier Preserve F— 1 Priority 4 Donation 0 Priority 5 Offer Pending Priority 6 Appraisal Pending Application Received Wellfield Protection Zones 1 - Berman Trust 2 - Trigoura 1-YEAR 3 - Perez 2-YEAR 4 - Mack 5-YEAR _ = 20-Y EAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST Priority 2 0.5 Miles Figure 12 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 2 CONS€ ATION LLIER Collier Couroity .'•=�'� Packet Pg. 516 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 0 0.5 1 Miles Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA .-_ = = 20-YEAR Conservation Collier Preserve Soil Type Donation BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE Offer Pending SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, Appraisal Pending DEPRESSIONAL ® Application Received CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR Wellfield Protection Zones SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL 1-YEAR HALLANDALE AND BOCA FINE 2-YEAR SANDS 5-YEAR HALLANDALE FINE SAND rman Trust 2 - Trigoura 3 - Perez 4 - Mack Figure 13 - Collier County Soil Survey CON ATION MER Co er CMHty Packet Pg. 517 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA JWner Names: Berman I rust, I rlgoura, I erez, IvlacK Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 36THAVE SE uaie: Hugust s, LULL _ r 38TH AVE SE cn o 0O m �LU 2 40T i AVE SE 4 3 42ND AVE SE 175 1-75 175 0 0.5 1 Miles Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA Q Conservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending 1 - Berman Trust Appraisal Pending 2 - Trigoura Application Received 3 - Perez pp LIDAR 4 - Mack Value High : 104.644 Low :-4.11745 COZY ATION LLIER Co er IZMHty Figure 14 LIDAR Elevation Map Q Packet Pg. 518 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity The parcels within the Gore TPA provide habitat and dispersal corridors for a significant number of imperiled and common wildlife species. The TPA parcels are located within 1 mile of the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, Picyaune Strand State Forest and Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, as well as the low -density c development of the Northern Golden Gate Estates residential area. A wildlife crossing exists beneath i-75 which `" provides connectivity between the Gore TPA and Picayune Strand State Forest. y a� Q Z74 M a H a� L ,O V 2 0 W Packet Pg. 519 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack 26.A.13 Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 32ND AVE SE 32ND AVE SE 34THAVE SE 34THAVE SE 36TH AVE SE 36TH AVE SE 1 38TH AVE SE 38TH AVE SE 0 40THAVE SE 40THAVE SE m O H O 42ND AVE SE �2� Q 175 175 1-75 _ 48TH AVE SE 48TH AVE SE O 50TH AVE SE 50TH AVE SE ❑ cn U m Z 52ND AVE SE BERSON BLVD LU 53RD AVE SE /1 0 0.5 1 2 Miles M a Wild life_Crossing_Locations_in_Florida Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve in - Conservation Collier Preserve Donation 1 Offer Pending Appraisal Pending - Application Received Conservation Lands Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Picayune Strand State Forest CON TION LLIER CA, County Figure 15 - Conservation Lands Packet Pg. 520 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack 3.2 Human Values Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 3.2.1 Recreation Acquisition of the parcels within the Gore TPA would be an expansion of the existing Conservation Collier Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve. The Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve currently provides 1.5 miles of hiking trails with conceptual plans for expansion in the coming years dependent on acquisitions. Overall, it is important to note that adding onto the preserve will provide additional acreage that will not be developed and in turn will be available for wildlife utilization. The addition of trails and site improvements to these parcels will be evaluated and reviewed. Potential public use opportunities for the parcels within the TPA include: Hiking: Some of the parcels could be incorporated into the preserve trail system. Nature Photography: These properties provide opportunities for nature photography. Birdwatching: Parcels will provide opportunities for birdwatching and are included in an annual Christmas Bird Count Route. Kayaking/Canoeing: The parcels do not provide opportunities for kayaking or canoeing. However, the preserve as a whole may have such opportunities in the future along the canal as budgeting and permitting consideration allow. Swimming: This property does not provide opportunities for swimming. Hunting: Hunting opportunities will be assessed with each management plan update to the preserve. The limited acreage and existing private inholdings indicate that hunting would not be a compatible land use at this time. Fishing: Acquisition of TPA parcels may provide opportunities for fishing in the future along the canal as budgeting and permitting consideration allow. 3.2.2 Accessibility Additional passive recreational hiking trails may be considered for incorporation on the parcels within the Gore TPA. Parcels within the TPA are accessible via Desoto Blvd, 401h Ave SE, 381h Ave SE, and 361h Ave SE. Packet Pg. 521 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement The TPA parcels are visible along Desoto Blvd and would contribute to preserving the natural aesthetics of the Golden Gate Estates. Figure 16 — Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve Hiking Troil 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Approximately 50-65% of the plant communities within the TPA parcels are infested with invasive vegetation — primarily Brazilian pepper. Other species of concern include lantana, mission grass, cogon grass, and Boston fern. 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire The TPA parcels contain fire dependent communities that have experienced decades of fire suppression and hydrologic changes that have resulted in a significant dry down of wetland habitats. The TPA parcels and surrounding areas have significant wildfire risk and would be unlikely candidates for maintenance through controlled burning until significant fuel reduction took place within the parcels and surrounding private lands. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security Parcels within the Gore TPA experience occasional ATV trespass issues and some illegal dumping in the road right of ways. Consideration must be made to preventing ATV trespass if incorporating public use opportunities onto acquisition parcels. Packet Pg. 522 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 3.3.3 Assistance The FWC Invasive Plant Management Section (IPMS) has provided funding assistance for exotic vegetation removal within the Gore TPMA in the past. Opportunities exist for additional funding assistance to offset initial exotic removal costs. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is Zoned as Estates. Estates zoning provides lands for low density residential development in a semi - rural to rural environment, with limited agricultural activities. In addition to low density residential density with limited agricultural activities, the E district is also designed to accommodate as Conditional Uses, Development that provides services for and is compatible with the low density residential, semi -rural and rural character of the E district. Packet Pg. 523 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA JWner Names: Berman I rust, I rlgoura, f erez, IvlacK 42N� 38TH AVE SE 0 0 . 175 175 J 0 0.5 Miles r. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA onservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending Appraisal Pending Application Received Zoning General A-MHO-RLSAO E PUD-RLSAO Figure 17—Zoning Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 uaie: Hugust s, LULL 1-75 CON E- ATION LUER Packet Pg. 524 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA JWner Names: Berman 1 rust, 1 rlgoura, I erez, IylacK 36THAVE SE Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 uaie: Hugust s, LULL 1 38TH AVE SE (D J m� O H � 4 _ a, 40T�H AVE SE 3 Ir 0 0.5 Miles Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPA Q Conservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending Appraisal Pending Q Application Received Future Land Use Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District/RLSA Estates Desingation - Rural Industrial District Ad Figure 18 —Future Land Use 1-75 1 CON ATION WEIR cA., c..hty Packet Pg. 525 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 3.4.2 Development Plans The parcels within the Gore TPA are within an area being rapidly targeted for development for clearing and new home construction. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following does not affect the scoring. The following are items that will be addressed in the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners if this property moves forward for ranking. Examples: Removal of debris, property survey for parcels, parcels need to be divided, contamination (Phase I & 11 testing needed) Gore Preserve TPA No additional acquisition considerations were noted during the review and site visit for this parcel. Trash and dumping concerns will be reviewed and highlighted on a parcel -by -parcel basis as applications are received. 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Annual Management Initial Recurring Comments Element Cost Cost Acquired lands within the Gore TPA would be treated on an Invasive $500 per annual basis and acreage incorporated into the existing Vegetation $250 per acre preserve maintenance to reduce acreage cost. Initial per Removal acre acre cost will be higher for newly acquired parcels and should reduce over time with continued maintenance Trail Construction $5000 $100 If public access trails are incorporated into acquisition and Signage parcels TOTAL $217,090 $106,145 5. Potential for Matching Funds The primary partnering agencies for conservation acquisitions, and those identified in the ordinance are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and The Florida Forever Program. The following highlights potential for partnering funds, as communicated by agency staff. Florida Communities Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program: The FCT Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program provides grant funds to local governments and nonprofit organizations to acquire conservation lands, urban open spaces, parks and greenways. Application for this program is typically made for pre -acquired sites up to two years from the time of acquisition. The Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program assists the Department of Environmental Protection in helping communities meet the challenges of growth, supporting viable community development and protecting natural resources and open space. The program receives 21 percent Florida Forever appropriation. Packet Pg. 526 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 Florida Forever Program: Staff has been advised that the Florida Forever Program is concentrating on funding parcels already included on its ranked priority list. This parcel is not inside a Florida Forever priority project boundary. Additionally, the Conservation Collier Program has not been successful in partnering with the Florida Forever Program due to conflicting acquisition policies and issues regarding joint title between the programs. 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: Gore TPA Target Protection Mailing Area: Gore Folio(s): 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006, 415057560002 Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points Awarded Points percentage 1- Ecological Value 160 120 75 2 - Human Value 80 54 68 3 - Restoration and Management 80 48 60 4 - Vulnerability 80 40 50 TOTAL SCORE 400 262 66 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 120 1.1.1 - Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal Berm, 100 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) Mesic flatwoods in areas where Wetland b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Hardwoods Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311- Mesic Flatwoods) 60 60 have transitioned from hydrologic changes c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) N N O N r� m m E E 0 U 0 N a c 0 :r .y .3 Q c J ti Go O M N Q a H a) L 0 x t= a� 0 0 U LO Q ti c a� E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 527 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 20 b. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 20 c. Parcel has 5 2 CLC listed plant species 10 d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 90 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 10 adjacent to Gore Preserve c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 40 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 20 Faka Union Canal N N O N r� a� Z4 m m E E 0 U 0 N a 0 :r .y .3 Q c J ti Go 0 M N Q a F- a) `0 x a� 0 L 0 U LO Q ti c a� E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 528 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 200 1.4.1 - Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is > 300 acres 150 150 424.18 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 50 Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 450 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 120 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 80 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 b. Fishing 20 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 20 e. Equestrian 20 20 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 95 N N O N M a� m m E E 0 U 0 N a c 0 N .3 Q c J ti Go 0 C) N Q a F_ a) L 0 x a� 0 L C U LO Q ti c a� E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 529 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 15 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 5 Mature cypress and pine b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 adjacent to Desoto Blvd d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 190 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 54 Possible Awarded 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Comments Points Points 3.1 -VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 50 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore 100 and maintain native plant communities (<30%) N N 0 N a� Z4 m m E 0 U 0 N a c 0 :r y .3 Q c 0 J ti 0 0 C) N Q M a F_ a� `0 x t= a� 0 L 0 U LO Q ti c a� E z U r Q Packet Pg. 530 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 High invasive density but C. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore 50 equally high50 native seed and maintain native plant communities (>65%) source and diversity intermixed. d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 25 e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire dependent plant 20 communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is Fire unlikely incompatible with prescribed fire 0 0 to be safely contained 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 50 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) ATV trespass a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 50 and minimal potential dumping b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 20 (Please describe) c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 5 d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 5 3.4.1 - Management assistance by other entity Cypress Cove a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 5 Landkeeper assistance possible b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 105 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded 80 48 Points/Possible Points*80) N N O N r� a� m m E E 0 U 0 N a c 0 :r y .3 Q c J ti 0 0 M N Q M a a� L 0 x a� 0 L 0 U LO Q ti c a� E z r Q Packet Pg. 531 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 75 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 50 Estates d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 15 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi- unit residential development 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 90 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 40 N N O N a� 2 m m E E 0 U 0 N a c 0 y .3 Q c cc J ti Go O M N Q a F_ a) L ,0 V x t= a� 0 L C U LO Q ti c a� E t v 2 r Q Packet Pg. 532 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack 7. Additional Site Photos Mature Cypress within Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Faka-Union canal with opportunities for enhance public access amenities Date: August 3, 2022 N N O N M N 3 3 Z74 M a F- a� L ,O V 2 0 W Packet Pg. 533 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Date: August 3, 2022 Typical site conditions of wetland hardwood communities that have transitioned to mesic flatwood. N N O N M r-+ N 7 IM 3 Z74 Packet Pg. 534 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Date: August 3, 2022 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify N statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a N collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for a acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative ' as of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for E natural resource conservation. o Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, MA sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, a upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities a are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, c based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential _J Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. 00 Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very N High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. Q This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC a� Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for 0 the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from = water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. o W Figure 11. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Map c` This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. Packet Pg. 535 26.A.13 Initial Criteria Screening Report- Gore TPA Owner Names: Berman Trust, Trigoura, Perez, Mack Folio Number: 41508680004, 41507440009, 415606000006,415057560002 Figure 12: CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones Date: August 3, 2022 High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. N N 0 N a� ,74 M a F- as L ,O V 2 0 W Packet Pg. 536 26.A.14 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report Panther Walk TPMA Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Pan€her Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve cycle 10 [_ 11 Target Protection Area Parcels and Acreage: 262 parcels (513.07 ac) Applied Parcel Owner(s): Berman Trust (39155120000), McGinnis (39150600004), Repola (38848960002), Vaz (38845280002), and Scalley (38846640007) Staff Report Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 272/400 200 160 150 11 100 80 64 80 80 58 50 33 0 1 - Ecological 2 - Human 3 - Restoration 4- Value Value and Vulnerability Management ■Awarded Points ❑Possible Points Packet Pg. 537 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview, 1— Berrman Trust, 2 — McGinnis, 3 — Burns, 4 — Vaz, 5 - Scalley ... 5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................9 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)................................. 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................12 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 12 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure 6 — Palmetto prairie/scrub (left) and scrubby pine flatwoods (right) ........................... 15 Figure 7 — Depressional wetland and transitional habitats ..................................................... 15 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected........................................................................................... 16 Figure 8 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 17 Figure 9 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness............................................................................. 18 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 10 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 20 Figure 11 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 21 Figure 12 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 22 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 23 Figure13 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 24 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 25 2 N N O N M a� Q m m E 0 U 0 N Q c 0 A U Q c 0 J ti 0 0 M N Packet Pg. 538 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date:8/3/2022 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 25 Figure 14 — Off -road trail leading through palmetto scrub ..................................................... 25 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 26 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 26 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 26 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 26 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 29 4. Acquisition Considerations..................................................................................................................29 5. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................29 Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 29 5. Potential for Matching Funds.............................................................................................................. 29 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 29 7. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................34 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions ...................................... 39 3 N N O N M a� Q m m r E E 0 U 0 N a 0 r 2 .3 s Q c �a J ti 00 0 M N Packet Pg. 539 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 1. Introduction The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 4 Packet Pg. 540 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley 2. Summary of Property z J Z Lu ry LL D PLATT RD z r z Date:8/3/2022 IMMOKALEE RD 72NDAVE NE 58TH AVE 54TH AVE NE 0 0.5 1 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 1p 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve W z F S r 0 oil CON ATION LLIER Go r C.ounty Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview, 1 — Berman Trust, 2 — McGinnis, 3 — Repola Braffman, 4 — Vaz, 5 - Scalley 5 Packet Pg. 541 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 L 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area 16. Panther Walk Preserve Figure 2 - Parcel Close-up N N O N M N 7 7 CON51RATION C LLIER CIO ev Coia.nty rr , Packet Pg. 542 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Characteristic Value Comments Name Multiple Berman Trust, McGinnis, Burns, Vaz, and Scalley Folio Number 262 parcels Target Protection Northern Golden Area Gate Estates Scrub Size 513.07 total acres 262 parcels ranging between 1.14 and 7.62 acres Section, Township, and Range S31, Twn 47, R28 Zoning Category/TDRs E Estates Existing structures None Adjoining properties Residential Low -density, single-family homes and their Uses Development Plans Submitted None Known Property None known Irregularities Other County Dept None known Interest N N O N ai a� El Packet Pg. 543 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Total Score: 272/400 180 160 160 140 117 120 100 80 80 80 80 64 58 60 40 33 20 0 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and 4 - Vulnerability Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 117 160 73% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 40 53 75% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 21 27 80% 1.3 - Water Resources 16 27 60% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 40 53 75% 2 - Human Values 33 80 41% 2.1 - Recreation 6 34 17% 2.2 - Accessibility 23 34 67% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 4 11 38% 3 - Restoration and Management 64 80 80% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 55 55 100% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 9 23 40% 3.3 - Assistance 0 2 0% 4 - Vulnerability 58 80 72% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 56 58 96% 4.2 - Development Plans 2 22 10% Total 272 400 68% n. Packet Pg. 544 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire this property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for each of the Panther Walk parcels, which have an initial valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject properties and that appraisal report will determine the actual value of the subject properties. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** R.F. Berman Revocable Trust No address 1.17 $19,013 $47,000 Patricia E McGinnis No address 1.14 $18,525 $45,000 Andrea Repola Braffman No address 1.14 $14,051 $45,000 Maurice and Alinda Vaz No address 1.59 $19,597 $70,000 William J and Martha Scalley No address 1.14 $16,530 $45,000 TOTAL 6.18 $87,716 $252,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the Panther Walk parcels were obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in July 2022. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcels arezoned Estates which allows 1 unit per 2.25 acres. 0 Packet Pg. 545 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Location Description: Panther Walk Preserve Target Protection Area. Properties are located in North Golden Gate Estates just south of Immokalee Rd., west of Everglades Blvd., and just south of 561h Ave. NE. Property Description Owner Address and/or Folio Acreage Multiple (see map) Multiple (see map) 272 parcels; 532.4 ac. Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Does the property contain native plant communities? If yes, are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities present on the property? (Ord. 2002-63, Sec 10(1)(a) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): Cypress, Marshes, Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Mesic Flatwoods Ordinance Plant Community Corresponding Priority Natural Community (Florida Cooperative Land Cover System) Presence Tropical Hardwood Hammock Upland Hardwood Forest ❑ Xeric Oak Scrub Scrub ❑ Coastal Strand Coastal Upland ❑ Native Beach Coastal Upland ❑ Xeric Pine Scrub/Pine Flatwood ❑ Riverine Oak - ❑ High Marsh (Saline) Coastal Wetland ❑ Tidal Freshwater Marsh Coastal Wetland ❑ Other Native Habitats 2. Does the property offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(b) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): These properties may be accessed from several roads between 56th Ave NE and— 72th Ave NE off Everglades Boulevard North. The parcels offer land -based opportunities for natural resource -based recreation consistent with the goals of this program, including but not limited to, environmental education, hiking, and nature photography. Several of these parcels are adjacent to Estates Elementary School 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(c) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): 10 Packet Pg. 546 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date:8/3/2022 Hydric soils exist on just over 71% of the parcels. These properties are within the Horse Pen Strand and most contain wetlands, therefore providing habitat for wetland dependent species. These properties contribute moderately to the aquifer. The presence of hydrologic indicators on most of the properties, such as cypress knees, buttressed trunks, and open marshes, indicates that most of the properties contain surface water for at least part of the year. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(d) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): a Listed plant and animal species have been documented within the Panther Walk Preserve. These parcels all fall within the same wetland system as the Preserve. The native plant communities present within these parcels provide additional habitat for a suite of upland and wetland dependent species and wildlife including the Florida panther and black bear 4. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): Parcels will enhance the Panther Walk Preserve. The parcels all fall within the Horsepen Strand which flows south from Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) owned by the South Florida Water Management District and Audubon Florida. Any qualified land which meets at least two of the above criteria and has matching funds available and/or which Conservation Collier funds availability would leverage a significantly higher funding rank in another acquisition program. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? Yes ❑ No ❑ If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds significantly increase the rank or funding priority of the parcel for the other agency's acquisition program? Yes ❑ No ❑ MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ❑Yes ❑No The properties satisfy 5 initial screening criteria 11 Packet Pg. 547 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities Cypress strand forest: This habitat is dominated by mature cypress growing in deep water. The midstory is comprised of strangler fig and coastal plain willow. The understory is comprised of swamp fern, alligator flag, and other submerged and emergent vegetation. Numerous species of rare epiphytes are found is these forests. Cypress/mixed hardwood forests: This habitat is found along the margins of the cypress strand forest and freshwater marshes. The canopy is comprised of cypress, laurel oak, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The midstory is comprised of myrsine, dahoon holly, wax myrtle, and Brazilian pepper. The understory can be sparse or dense and comprised of swamp fern, saw grass, and sedges. Oak/Pine hammock: This habitat is dominated by laurel oak, slash pine, and cabbage palms. The midstory consists of myrsine and saw palmetto. The understory consists of ferns, muscadine, and greenbriers. Freshwater marsh: The deepest portions of these marshes are dominated by coastal plain willow with either pickerel weed or alligator flag. The shallower areas are comprised of lance leaf arrowhead and sedges which give way to grasses and ferns around the perimeter. Wet prairie: These transitional habitats are found between wetter areas such as cypress strands or marshes and drier areas such as hammocks and flatwoods. They dominated by grasses and sedges with a wide variety of small herbaceous species. Pine flatwoods: This habitat is dominated by slash pines with little midstory. The understory is comprised of saw palmetto, rusty lyonia, and grasses. Flatwoods present show both hydric and mesic qualities within a single parcel. Flatwoods are listed as a priority natural community in our region by the Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project. Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Hand fern Cheiroglossa palmata State Endangered Not Listed Stiff -leaved wild -pine, Cardinal airplant Tillandsia fasciculata State Endangered Not Listed Fuzzy-wuzzy air plant Tillandsia pruinosa State Endangered Not Listed Giant air plant Tillandsia utriculata State Endangered Not Listed Reflexed wild -pine, Northern needleleaf Tillandsia balbisiana State Threatened Not Listed 12 Packet Pg. 548 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve Cycle 10 1 11 CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Priority 1 (highest) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities N N O N M N 7 7 El CpN ATIQN LLIER Coen County `"8 13 Packet Pg. 549 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System Land Cover - Canal - Cultural - Lacustrine - Cypress - CypresslTupelc(incl CylTu mixed) Extractive Fallow Cropland - Hydric Pine Flatwoods - Improved Pasture - Institutional - Irrigated Cropland Isolated Freshwater Swamp - Low Intensity urban Marshes - Mesic Flatwoods - Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland - Ornamentals - Palmetto Prairie Quarry Pond - Residential, Low Density - Rural Open - Rural open Pine - Rural Structures Sand & Gravel Pits - Scrub - Scrubby Flatwoods - Shrub and Brushland Transportation - Tree Nurseries i - unimprovedMoodland Pasture _urban Open Land 0 0.5 1 2 Miles ii Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area 6.— Panther Walk Preserve Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System CONS ATIQN LLIER Go ier County 14 Packet Pg. 550 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Figure 6 — Cypress strand forest Figure 7— Wet prairie situated between pine flatwood and mixed wetland hardwood communities N N O N M fA 3 7 El 15 Packet Pg. 551 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities The biological value of these parcels is primarilythe result of containing high integrity habitats ranging from upland pine flatwoods to deep cypress strand forests. These parcels were disturbed in the past but have had decades to mature into communities that are well adapted to their current environment. These high -quality habitats provide the basis for a thriving food chain for both terrestrial and aquatic species from invertebrates to the largest predators. Black bear scat was found on several parcels and Florida panthers are well documented within the adjacent Panther Walk Preserve. Although not detected during the site visit, American alligators are known to utilize the strand. Numerous river otters were observed crossing the roads. These parcels provide habitat for several species of listed birds which have all been documented in the immediate area including wood storks, little blue herons, Florida sandhill cranes, Audubon's crested caracaras, and snail kites. Wetlands of varying depth provide foraging habitats nearly year-round. Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected State Federal Common Name Scientific Name Mode of Detection Status Status Little blue heron Egretta caerulea Threatened n/a Observed on site visit Florida sandhill Antigone canadensis Threatened Observed on site visit crane pratensis Crested Caracara Caracara cheriway Threatened Threatened Rostrhamus sociabilis Everglades Snail Kite Endangered Endangered plumbeus Trail camera on Panther Florida panther Puma concolor coryi Endangered Endangered Walk Preserve 16 Packet Pg. 552 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Bald Eagle Nests Q Florida Panther Mortality Florida Panther Telemetry • Black Bear Telemetry Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 0 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve Figure 8 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) N N O N M N 7 7 CCINJbWATION FjJWLL C p er CountyI" 17 Packet Pg. 553 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 0 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve VALUE - 1 species 2-4 species 0 5-5 species 0 7 species 8-13 species Figure 9 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness N N O N M N 7 7 21 CON ATIQN LLIER CA 7BY County IN Packet Pg. 554 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.3 Water Resources These parcels fall within or are adjacent to the northern reaches of the Horsepen Strand. Strands are a type of forested swamp that form slow flowing, linear drainage channels across flatlands with high water tables. The Horsepen Strand begins at Immokalee Rd in the Northern Golden Gate Estates and flows south into the North Belle Meade area located north of 1-75. These parcels protect water resources significantly. They provide recharge capacity for the Surficial Aquifer. Properties in this area are subject to frequent flooding. These parcels provide critical flood water attenuation as more land is cleared and filled for development. Wetland vegetation on these parcels slows down the flow of water and filters out nutrients and sediments before it reaches the canals which flow into the gulf. The parcels also provide high quality habitat for wetland dependent species, especially wading birds. 19 Packet Pg. 555 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves - Priority 3 Cycle Priority 4 10 F_ , Priority 5 0 11 r-] Priority 6 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST Priority 2 Figure 10 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones CON ATION LLIER Goer County 20 Packet Pg. 556 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Co Ilier_Cou nty_So il_S urvey COMPNAME BASINGER FINE SAND BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW AND OKEELANTA SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW RNE SAND IMMOKALEF FINE SAND MALABAR FINE SAND MYAKKA FINE SAND OLDSMAR FINE SAND - OLDSMAR FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM - PINEDAAND RIVIERA FINE SANDS - RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM - COPELAND FINE SAND - WABASSO FINE SAND Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve Figure 11 - Collier County Soil Survey W CpN ATION LLIER Co Fer County 21 Packet Pg. 557 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 I--] 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve LIDAR 2020 Value - - High : 104.644 — Low :-4.11745 Figure 12 LIDAR Elevation Mop CONSE ATION C LLI ER Co ter C.nunty 22 Packet Pg. 558 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity These parcels are connected to the existing Panther Walk Preserve. The low -density nature of development in this neighborhood allows wildlife to move relatively unimpeded across the landscape and north into the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (Figure 13). A protected corridor is necessary to preserve wildlife's freedom of movement through this rapidly developing landscape. These parcels N protect the highly diverse Horsepen Strand, expand the Panther Walk Preserve, and provide the backbone for a N cli potential north -south corridor as well as necessary refugia for "urban" wildlife. a� a 23 Packet Pg. 559 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 13 - Conservation Lands N N O N M a+ N 7 7 El CON ATION LUER Co �eC- County ' = 24 Packet Pg. 560 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 3.2 Human Values 3.2.1 Recreation These parcels provide seasonal opportunity for passive nature -based recreation such as hiking and wildlife watching. Once a contiguous string of parcels is acquired an up to two-mile trail may be installed. c N 3.2.2 Accessibility "' Street parking is available along 56t"-72nd Ave NE. Parcels within the strand may only be seasonally accessible while those along the perimeter may be dry year-round. Visitors from the surrounding a neighborhood and Estates Elementary can walk or cycle to the trailhead. ' 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement These parcels provide green space in a rapidly developing area and mature habitats found on these parcels provide aesthetically pleasing areas to visit. Figure 14 — Mature cypress strand forest and marsh 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Invasive vegetation is primarily found along the roadside swales but is intermixed throughout some parcels. Infestation rates range from less than 5% to 30%. Invasive vegetation is interspersed in such a way that replanting is not necessary once removed. Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and old-world climbing fern are the 25 Packet Pg. 561 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 predominant species. Low infestation rates, low seed source, and ease of access should reduce management costs significantly. 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire Most parcels within this TPMA are wetlands which do not require prescribed fire maintenance. Some of the surrounding flatwoods would benefit from reintroduction of prescribed fire. These flatwoods are compatible with prescribed fire during the wet season. Fire breaks may need to be installed to protect nearby homes. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security There are some off -road vehicle trails crossing the parcels. Historically, attempts to prevent off-roader trespass have been ineffective, expensive, and have resulted in additional vegetation damage as trespassers have cut new trails to circumvent the installed barriers. Instead of total prevention, the best method to mitigate further damage may be to attempt to restrict off-roaders to already established trails. 3.3.3 Assistance Assistance is not predicted. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned Estates. This zoning allows for one single family home and one guest house per 2.25 acres. The future land use designation for this parcel is Estates. The wetland nature of these parcels makes them undesirable for development. 26 Packet Pg. 562 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles = Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 EL 11 N Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area 11- Panther Walk Preserve Zoning General A -MHO A-MHO-RLSAO CPUD E F_ MPUD Figure 15 —Zoning N N O N M fA 3 7 El CON ATION pp LUER 27 Packet Pg. 563 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Conservation Collier Preserves Cycle 10 0 11 Panther Walk Preserve Expansion Area Panther Walk Preserve Future Land Use Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District/RLSA Estates Desingation RF-Neutral RF-Receiving Figure 16 —Future Land Use CON ATION LLIER Co ev Couxty 28 Packet Pg. 564 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date:8/3/2022 3.4.2 Development Plans Individual parcels within this area being rapidly developed. This patchy development threatens the ability to preserve contiguous swaths of habitat. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following does not affect the scoring. The following are items that will be addressed in the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners if this property moves forward for ranking. Staff recommend purchasing all parcels regardless of their proximity to the Panther Walk Preserve. This will allow for maximum flexibility in creating a contiguous corridor in the future and preserve the high -quality habitats observed. Although the matrix of undeveloped and partially developed lots in the Estates is compatible with many species, protected pockets of high -quality habitat provide necessary refugia and foraging grounds to complete the more secretive portions of their lifecycles. Even if not directly connected to a wildlife corridor or preserve, these refugia allow species to persist in increasingly developed landscapes. 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Initial Cost Annual Comments Element Recurring Cost $200/acre initial, $100/acre recurring. Low overall Invasive Vegetation $102600.00 ,,300.00 $51 costs are predicted due to the low infestation levels Removal and high accessibility. 513 acres total, not all parcels will be acquired simultaneously Trail Installation and $5,000.00 $1,000.00 Hand cutting trails Maintenance Interpretive Signage $1,000.00 $0.00 Total $108,600.00 $53,200.00 5. Potential for Matching Funds There are no known matching funds or partnership opportunities for acquisition in this area. 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 150 1.1.1- Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal Berm, 1630 100 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) 29 N N O N ai a� i, Packet Pg. 565 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic Flatwoods) 60 60 Hydric Pine Flatwoods c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 20 b. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 c. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 80 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c. CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 60 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) 30 N N O N CD i, Packet Pg. 566 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 ISO 1.4.1- Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is >_ 300 acres 150 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 440 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 117 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 20 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 e. Equestrian 20 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 31 N N O N ai a� Gl Packet Pg. 567 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 80 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year-round 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 15 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 115 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 33 Possible Awarded 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Comments Points Points 3.1- VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 120 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 100 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 32 N N O N M a� Gl Packet Pg. 568 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>6S%) 50 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary 25 to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire dependent plant 20 20 communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is incompatible 0 with prescribed fire 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 20 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please 20 20 describe) c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please 5 describe) d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 0 3.4.1 - Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 140 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded 80 64 Points/Possible Points*80) 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 125 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 33 2 Packet Pg. 569 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 5 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi -unit residential development 5 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 130 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 58 7. Additional Site Photos Wide off -road vehicle trail ringing freshwater marsh on 70t" Ave NE 34 N N O N M a� Gl Packet Pg. 570 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Horsepen Strand looking north from 601h Ave NE. Note lighter green cypress foliage in center surrounded by darker pines and oak Melaleuca infestation in transitional habitat zone on Repola parcel off 62"d Ave NE N N O N M fA 3 7 El 35 Packet Pg. 571 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date:8/3/2022 a :0 ROAD m Ni _ 4 r F s CORKSCREW ROAD a' 1MMOKALEE RDlCR 846 - �e . r. S 1. .. .� • ..� _ E. LI STSN «�.- CR�581OIL WELL RD r� t IMM LEE: RDIOR 848 _ a Sr" ES7 ROA �' -• •. _ _ 41 ?r" ,5 % .N �..rAa PI ERID ERD , •4 -- OPYEW �_... BLVD NALES° I I o � f 4� r q _ �< g PROJECT BOUNDARY - 21135 25 AC. +l a_ 0, .._. anage. NONE 0 1 2 3 9 5 6 7 1 B r0 map Scale, 12—p Milos This mep and all data mn[alned wi h,, ere eapplied R es is wiN na - Blvl°gwel Fes¢areM1 Ass¢°la[ec ¢Xpresaly 01•chma Location Map ioingkeal R,73 reh :iysonatex v¢va ibility fa tlamages ar IiabllRy tram any clarrrt 1ha. may apse P_ S.va Rtta C'nnicv Nlyd aere,mme ti Horsepen Strand Conservation Area 906 ma aeer m°n mep ara 7 " oma may meen me ph Vi 37 needa'Tnis mep was net creelea as acrvey ¢au nor ano�ld 2 be 61 fi94E.:7k U7N7 s¢d a ml1. It R [M1• —r, re,v°n.2glq t° °Nate pr°pa . -y Collier County Florida ,�a x'binl°giaibrcar com tiara, p-epa,aa bya pcenaed a�reer°r, wn..•.....a da law. u f Horsepen Strand Conservation Area N N O N M fA 3 Q d E O U N Q C 0 N .3 U a C J ti 00 O M N 36 Packet Pg. 572 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Left: State endangered giant air plant (Tillandsia utriculata) Center: State endangered hand fern (Cheiroglossa palmata) Right: State endangered fuzzy-wuzzy air plants (Tillandsia pruinosa) Potential Listed Wildlife Species Date:8/3/2022 AAA 1, , Common Name Scientific Name Status Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE Everglade snail kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus FE Wood stork Mycteria americana FT Audubon's crested caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT Mangrove fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor ST Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST American alligator Alligator mississippiensis FT (S/A) Status: FE=Federally Endangered, FT=Federally Threatened, FT (S/A)=Federally Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance, SE=State Endangered, ST=State Threatened, CE= Commercially Exploited 37 Packet Pg. 573 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 Non -Listed Wildlife Species Observed Species Scientific Name nine -banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus eastern gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis raccoon Procyon lotor North American river otter Lontra canadensis white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus black bear Ursus americanus cat Felis catus black racer Coluber constrictor chicken turtle Deirochelys reticularia southern leopard frog Lithobates sphenocephalus queen butterfly Danaus gilippus great blue heron Ardea herodias great egret Ardea alba green heron Butorides virescens American bittern Botaurus lentiginosus white ibis Eudocimus albus belted kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon anhinga Anhinga anhinga black -bellied whistling -ducks Dendrocygna autumnalis wild turkey Meleagris gallopavo red -shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus black vulture Coragyps atratus turkey vulture Cathartes aura American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos blue jay Cyanocitta cristata red -bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus downy woodpecker Dryobates pubescens yellow -bellied sapsucker Sphyrapicus varius pine warbler Setophaga pinus northern parula Setophaga americana blue -gray gnat catcher Polioptila caerulea northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis mourning dove Zenaida macroura common ground dove Columbina passerina northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis 38 Gl Packet Pg. 574 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a N collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida c N GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife M Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 a categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Fieure 4 - CLIP4 Prioritv Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Fieure 9. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Ma This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. Figure 17: CLIP4 Aauifer Recharge Prioritv and Wellfield Protection Zones 39 Packet Pg. 575 26.A.14 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Panther Walk TPMA Owner Name(S): Berman Trust, McGinnis, Repola, Vaz, and Scalley Date: 8/3/2022 High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department N 0 Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for N potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as N protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be a� regulated under this section. a 40 Packet Pg. 576 26.A.15 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report H H H Ranch TPMA Miles Target Protection Area Parcels and Acreage: 41 parcels (319.34 ac) Applied Parcel Owner(s), Acreage, and Folios: Sponseller (5.06ac, 00344200003), Scotti Trust (9.09ac, 00344120002), Guitierrez (4.88ac, 00344400007), Geren Revocable Trust (9.11ac, 00343800006) Staff Report Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 221/400 200 160 12 150 100 50 60 80 80 80 30 _ n JI 0 1-Ecological 2-Human 3 - 4- Value Value Restoration Vulnerability and Management ■Awarded Points ❑Possible Points i Packet Pg. 577 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1-Parcel Location Overview, 1— Berman Trust, 2 —McGinnis, 3— Repola Braffman, 4 — Vaz, 5 - ScaI I ey.......................................................................................................................................................5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................9 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)................................. 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................12 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 12 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure 6 — Cypress strand forest.............................................................................................. 15 Figure 7 — Wet prairie situated between pine flatwood and mixed wetland hardwood communities............................................................................................................................ 15 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected........................................................................................... 16 Figure 8 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 17 Figure 9 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness............................................................................. 18 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 10 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 20 Figure 11 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 21 Figure 12 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 22 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 23 Figure 13 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 24 2 Packet Pg. 578 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 25 Figure 14 — Mature cypress strand forest and marsh............................................................. 25 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 26 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 26 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 26 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 26 Figure15 - Zoning.................................................................................................................... 28 Figure16 - Zoning Overlays..................................................................................................... 29 Figure17 — Future Land Use................................................................................................... 30 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 31 4. Acquisition Considerations..................................................................................................................31 5. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................31 Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 31 5. Potential for Matching Funds.............................................................................................................. 31 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 31 7. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................38 Table 8: Potential Listed Wildlife Species................................................................................ 38 Table 9: Non -Listed Wildlife Species Observed ............................ Error! Bookmark not defined. APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions......................................38 3 Packet Pg. 579 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust 1. Introduction Date: 8/3/2022 The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 4 N N O N ri N 7 Packet Pg. 580 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 2. Summary of Property Miles Cycle 10 0 °11 HHH Ranch Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview, 1- Sponseller, 2 - Scotti Trust, 3 - Guitierrez, 4 - Geren Revocable Trust 5 N N O N v r N 7 Q1 3 Packet Pg. 581 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 i►•nM Cycle 10 E7 11 HHH Ranch Figure 2 - Parcel Close-up N N O N M r N 7 7 zo CONI&KATION LLIER Co � C_C __ty Packet Pg. 582 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Characteristic Value Comments Name Multiple Folio Number Multiple 00344200003, 00344120002, 00344400007, 00343800006 Target Protection Area HHH Ranch Size 319.34-acres total 41 parcels ranging from 2.08-40.04-acres Section, Township, and 533, Twn 49, R27 Range Zoning Category/TDRs A Agricultural Existing structures None Parcels to the north are agricultural but will be mined in Adjoining properties Agriculture, future. Parcels to east are owned by county and may be and their Uses Conservation developed for a variety of uses. Development Plans Submitted None Known Property None known Irregularities Other County Dept Yes Wilson corridor extension Interest N N O N M r N ZI Packet Pg. 583 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 160 1 - Ecological Value Total Score: 221/400 80 80 80 60 30 9 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and 4 - Vulnerability Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Date: 8/3/2022 Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1- Ecological Value 123 160 77% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 32 53 60% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 27 27 100% 1.3 - Water Resources 11 27 40% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 53 53 100 2 - Human Values 60 80 75% 2.1 - Recreation 34 34 100% 2.2 - Accessibility 23 34 67% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 3 11 25% 3 - Restoration and Management 30 80 37% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 21 55 38% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 9 23 40% 3.3 - Assistance 0 2 0% 4 - Vulnerability 9 80 11% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 2 58 4% 4.2 - Development Plans 7 22 30% Total 221 400 55% Packet Pg. 584 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally N desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, N utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or r N comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions a and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire this property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for the HHH Ranch area parcel, which has an initial valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject property and that appraisal report will determine the actual value of the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** Robert C and Bernie Sponseller No address 5.0 $47,000 Mary A Scotti Trust 8.74 $61,000 Michael A Guitierrez 4.88 $44,000 Michael Geren Revocable Trust 7.84 $55,000 TOTAL 26.46 $207,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the parcels was obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in July 2022. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. These parcels are within in Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay (RFMUO) Sending overlay with a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA), and approximately half are covered with a North Belle Meade Overlay. 9 Packet Pg. 585 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Location Description: HHH Ranch Target Protection Mailing Area (TPMA). Properties are located just north of I- 75 adjacent to the HHH Ranch A -list parcels from Cycle 10. Property Description Owner Address and/or Folio Acreage Multiple (see map) Multiple (see map) 41 parcels; 319.34 ac. This ISC covers the entirety of the TPMA for the HHH Ranch Area. If an ICSR is recommended to go before the CCLAAC in August 2022, the ICSR will also cover the entire TPMA. The map provided includes three (3) recent applications. If more applications are received, the parcels will be identified in the August 2022 ICSR. Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Does the property contain native plant communities? If yes, are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities present on the property? (Ord. 2002-63, Sec 10(1)(a) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): Hydric pine flatwoods, Mixed shrub wetland, Cypress, Mesic pine flatwoods Ordinance Plant Community Corresponding Priority Natural Community (Florida Cooperative Land Cover System) Presence Tropical Hardwood Hammock Upland Hardwood Forest ❑ Xeric Oak Scrub Scrub ❑ Coastal Strand Coastal Upland ❑ Native Beach Coastal Upland ❑ Xeric Pine Scrub/Pine Flatwood ❑ Riverine Oak - ❑ High Marsh (Saline) Coastal Wetland ❑ Tidal Freshwater Marsh Coastal Wetland ❑ Other Native Habitats 2. Does the property offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(b) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): There is potential access in the future as there is currently no public right of way to access the properties. The County Manager's agency recently acquired the 960 acres to the west and Conservation Collier will soon acquire the adjacent 256 acres. 10 Packet Pg. 586 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(c) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): N Hydric soils exist on just over 87% of the parcels and wetland plant communities are found throughout the c parcels. N rS r Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(d) Q Yes ❑ No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): FWC Species Richness Maps show potential for 4-7 species to utilize the properties including federally endangered Florida panther, red -cockaded woodpecker, Florida bonneted bat, and state -threatened Florida gopher tortoise and Big Cypress fox squirrel. Panther telemetry (from 1986-2020) shows consistent utilization of the site by radio -collared individuals. The property is included within known historic nesting/foraging habitat for endangered red -cockaded woodpeckers and a red -cockaded woodpecker was observed by Conservation Collier staff on the adjacent A -list parcels. 3. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) Yes ❑ No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): These parcels are adjacent to the 256 acres HHH Ranch parcels, which will soon be acquired by Conservation Collier. These parcels also contribute to an important wildlife corridor connecting species from the Florida Panther Refuge, Golden Gate Rural Estates, Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve, as well as the Picayune Strand State Forest and Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve to the south through wildlife underpasses under 1-75. Currently there is habitat connectivity between this site and the Conservation Collier Nancy Payton Preserve. This property provides an ecological link to the northern range expansion goals of the Red - Cockaded Woodpecker Recovery Plan. Any qualified land which meets at least two of the above criteria and has matching funds available and/or which Conservation Collier funds availability would leverage a significantly higher funding rank in another acquisition program. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? Yes ❑ No ❑ If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds significantly increase the rank or funding priority of the parcel for the other agency's acquisition program? Yes ❑ No ❑ MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ❑Yes ❑No The properties satisfy 5 initial screening criteria 11 Packet Pg. 587 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities HHH parcels contain a variety of vegetative communities displaying varied successional states and overlap of species. The early successional state is primarily the result of a wildfire that recently passed through the area, N o causing severe canopy and mid -story mortality. The overlap of species between plant communities can be partly N contributed to an altered hydroperiod caused by the 1-75 canal drainage. ri w The major plant communities present are hydric flatwoods (CLIP Priority II Natural Community), mesic flatwoods a (CLIP Priority 11 Natural Community), and cypress/cabbage. Due to wildfire, the seasonally drier mesic flatwoods , had a significant thermal thinning of the slash pine (Pinus elliotti var. densa) canopy. Areas where the Florida r slash pine canopy was removed by fire are dominated by a cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto) midstory, now acting as the overstory; this cabbage palm midstory already existed before the wildfire. The mesic flatwoods c groundcover is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), grasses and U herbaceous plants, and bare patches of sand. Hydric flatwoods seemed to be less severely impacted by wildfire, as mature Florida slash pine still form a scattered canopy in the lower, wetter areas. The hydric flatwood midstory is dominated by cabbage palm and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). Ground cover in the hydric flatwoods is composed of scattered saw palmetto and small wax myrtle, along with grasses, sedges, and herbaceous plants. The cypress/cabbage plant community had a mix of cypress (Taxodium spp.) and Florida slash pine overstory before the wildfire occurred. Most of the slash pine trees were lost in the fire. Most cypress trees were top killed; they are resprouting from the base but are only a few feet tall. The midstory in this plant community is dominated by cabbage palms, now acting as the canopy. The cypress/cabbage groundcover is dominated by saw palmetto, grasses, sedges, and herbaceous plants. Invasive plants encountered include cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), Caesar weed (Urena lobata), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), rattlebox (Crotalaria spp.), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), and shrubby false buttonwood (Spermacoce verticillata). Cogon grass, Caesar weed, Brazilian pepper, and rattlebox are restricted to the drier upland sites, while melaleuca is present in wet and dry areas. There are large stands of top -killed melaleuca saplings that are resprouting from the base. The shrubby false buttonwood appears in disturbed, cleared areas and has begun to spread into the drier mesic flatwoods. Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Giant air plant Tillandsia utriculata State Endangered Not Listed 12 Packet Pg. 588 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Noturol Communities CA 7BY County N N O N M r N 7 7 zo 13 Packet Pg. 589 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Cycle 10 0 11 HHH Ranch Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System Land Cover Canal �1 Cypress Cypress/Tupelo(incl Cy/Tu mixed) Glades Marsh Hydric Pine Flatwoods Mesic Flatwoods Miles Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland Palmetto Prairie Rural Open ® Rural Structures Shrub and Brushland Strand Swamp Transportation Wet Flatwoods Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System CON41&WATION LLIER Co Fer County v 14 Packet Pg. 590 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Figure 6 — Cypress and slash pine forest that has been subjected to stand replacing wildfire Figure 7 —Good condition hydric pine flatwood N N O N M r N 7 3 El 15 Packet Pg. 591 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities CLIP4 Species Richness Maps show potential for 5-10 focal species to utilize the properties including federally endangered Florida panther, red -cockaded woodpecker, Florida bonneted bat, and state -threatened Florida gopher tortoise and Big Cypress fox squirrel. Panther telemetry (from 1986-2020) shows consistent utilization of the site by radio -collared individuals, most recently a breeding female with kittens. FWC panther road mortality data along Interstate 75 indicates there is movement of Florida panther between the property and the Picayune N No Strand State Forest, with the most recent road mortalities between the site and the state forest occurring in March N ri 2020. The property is included within known historic nesting/foraging habitat for endangered red -cockaded w woodpeckers. There has been agricultural clearing including logging of cypress and pine within the property. Site inspection indicates recruitment of young pines is occurring within the logged area. The presence of six -lined racer a runners (Cnemidophorus sexlineatus) indicates a scrubby component to some of the mesic flatwoods. 0) Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Mode of Detection Red -cockaded Picoides borealis Endangered Endangered Observed on site visit Woodpecker Florida Panther Puma concolar coryi Endangered Endangered FWC Telemetry 16 Packet Pg. 592 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust 26.A.15 Date:8/3/2022 ■ �� ` ■ 1`11*7IIm ■ �� 4 M1 ■ low ■AI : ■■P 1■ m BLACK8 ORN1RD +1 175 ■ 175 ■=ova *-.m -E:p Ur n Figure 9 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness 0.5 Miles 1 CON CA 7BY County TIQN LLIER 18 Packet Pg. 594 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.3 Water Resources The mixed scrub/shrub wetlands, cypress, and hydric pine flatwoods hold shallow surface water during the wet season. These wet areas provide seasonal habitat for wetland dependent species, especially wading birds. These areas contain depressional soils, primarily Riviera fine sand with limestone substratum. These parcels do not provide significant aquifer recharge capacity, but the northern areas protect the 20-year wellfield protection zone. N N O N ZI 19 Packet Pg. 595 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date:8/3/2022 - -------------------------------------------------------------- - -- - - r� BLACKBURN RD 0 0.5 Miles Cycle Priority 5 10 Priority 6 0 11 HHH Ranch Wellfield Protection Zones - = 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge i Priority 1- HIGHEST - Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 10 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 175 N N O N M N 7 tm 7 zo C_ONSHWATION LLIER 20 Packet Pg. 596 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Cycle 10 0 11 HHH Ranch BOCA FINE SAND BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, DEPRESSIONAL HALLANDALE FINE SAND HOLOPAWAND OKEELANTA SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM Figure 11 - Collier County Soil Survey Miles MALABAR FINE SAND OLDSMAR FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM CON ATION � LLIER Co Fer County v 21 Packet Pg. 597 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 0 0.5 1 Miles Cycle 10 0 11 HHH Ranch LIDAR 2020 Value - High: 104.644 Low: -4-11745 Figure 12 LIDAR Elevation Mop 175 N N O N M r N 7 3 CONSE ATION C LLI ER Co ter C.nunty 22 Packet Pg. 598 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity These parcels directly connect to a large block of conservation easements to the east, the Picayune Strand State Forest via wildlife underpasses to the south, and to the remaining undeveloped portions of the Golden Gate Estates to the north and west. Telemetry data show Florida panther use this area to cross between the Nancy Payton Preserve in the Golden Gate Estates and larger conservation areas to the south and the east. These parcels also provide an ecological link to the northern range expansion goals of the Red -Cockaded Woodpecker Recovery N No Plan. Protecting habitat on both sides of 1-75 may provide opportunities to install additional wildlife crossings. Nc i r N 7 3 Q 23 Packet Pg. 599 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Cycle 10 0 11 HHH Ranch Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 13 - Conservation Lands N N O N M r fn 7 i� 7 CONS ATION LLIER Co feC, County :, �� 24 Packet Pg. 600 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3.2 Human Values 3.2.1 Recreation These parcels provide year-round access for a wide variety of recreational activities including but not limited to hunting, fishing, equestrian, cycling, hiking. The open landscape provides excellent opportunities for wildlife watching. There is an established trail network on site with minimal N alteration could provide miles of hiking trails. N ri r 3.2.2 Accessibility Currently the site is accessed through a gate on Blackburn Rd which is closed to the public. Future development a on the adjoining counting owned parcel on the western border as well as the proposed Wilson corridor , extension may provide easy paved access. r 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement E These parcels currently provide green space along 1-75. c Figure 14 — Flooded hydric pine flatwoods 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Invasive vegetation infestation rates are higher in the Cycle 11 than the Cycle 10 parcels. Invasive plants encountered include cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), Caesar weed (Urena lobata), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), rattlebox (Crotalaria spp.), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), and shrubby false buttonwood (Spermacoce verticillata). Melaleuca seedlings infest large swaths of wetland habitat. The disturbed nature of the site makes it vulnerable to additional infestations, especially cogon grass. 25 Packet Pg. 601 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire Despite a recent history of stand replacing wildfire, these parcels would still benefit from regular prescribed burning. The proximity to 1-75 limits, but not bar, the application of prescribed fire. Although native, the high density of cabbage palms creates an obstacle to restoration by overcrowding more desirable species and creating fuel loads that other species cannot tolerate when burned. When occurring at i sufficient density, cabbage palms burn at high temperatures that kill the overstory trees. This reduction N in canopy cover creates desirable conditions for cabbage palm recruitment which in turn increases M intensity of subsequent fires. Cabbage palms will have to be chemically or mechanically thinned and r then burned on a short return interval in order the restore the slash pine and cypress canopy. Existing a� a trails, right of ways, and bulldozer lines may be utilized as fire breaks. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security This site requires major canopy rehabilitation in the form of replanting due to past wildfires, logging, grazing, clearing, and off-roading. Invasive species and cabbage palms will need to be controlled before planting occurs. There are numerous off -road vehicle trails crossing the parcels primarily around the perimeter and leading to private inholdings. One individual is currently residing on the Cycle 10 parcels but is scheduled to leave with his belongings before closing. The remoteness of the parcels and existing perimeter barbwire fencing limits trespass. Most off -road traffic within the parcels is suspected to be done by those accessing private inholdings within the TPMA. There have been reports of poaching on the parcels in the recent past. 3.3.3 Assistance Assistance is not predicted. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use These parcels are within in Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay (RFMUO) Sending overlay with a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA), and approximately half are covered with a North Belle Meade Overlay LDC section 2.03.08.A provide the description of Sending Lands: RFMU sending lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species. RFMU sending lands are the principal target for preservation and conservation. Density may be transferred from RFMU sending lands as provided in section 2.03.07 D.4.c. All NRPAs within the RFMU district are also RFMU sending lands. LDC section 2.03.08.13 provide the description of NRPAs: The purpose and intent of the Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay District (NRPA) is to: protect endangered or potentially endangered species by directing incompatible land uses away from their habitats; to identify large, connected, intact, and relatively unfragmented habitats, which may be important for these listed species; and to support State and Federal agencies' efforts to protect endangered or potentially endangered species and their habitats. NRPAs may include major wetland systems and regional flow -ways. These lands generally should be the focus of any federal, state, County, 26 Packet Pg. 602 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 or private acquisition efforts. Accordingly, allowable land uses, vegetation preservation standards, development standards, and listed species protection criteria within NRPAs set forth herein are more restrictive than would otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district and shall to be applicable in addition to any standards that apply tin the underlying zoning district. 27 Packet Pg. 603 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Cycle 10 0 11 HHH Ranch Zoning General 0 A Figure 15 - Zoning N N O N M r fn 7 i� 7 zo CON ATION rA LLIER Co feC, County � �� Packet Pg. 604 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Cycle 10 0 11 HHH Ranch Zoning Overlay RFMUO-NBMO-RECEIVING RFMUO-NBMO-SENDING RFMUO-NRPA-NBMO-SENDING RFMUO-NRPA-SENDING Figure 16 - Zoning Overlays N N O N M r N 7 tsf 3 El CON ATION LUER Co fer County =_ . 29 Packet Pg. 605 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Cycle 10 0 11 HHH Ranch Future Land Use _Agricultural / Rural Designation RF-Receiving RF-Sending Figure 17 — Future Land Use zo CONJUWATION � LLIER Co ter County v = " - 30 Packet Pg. 606 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3.4.2 Development Plans Zoning favor conservation within the TPMA, however the Wilson Corridor Extension may be aligned through the property. Once the corridor is constructed surrounding lands may transition from agricultural to more intensive forms of use. N 4. Acquisition Considerations N Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this ri r property. The following does not affect the scoring. The following are items that will be addressed in the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners if this property moves forward for ranking. a Wilson Corridor Extension may be aligned through property. Transportation will be expected to follow the Exceptional Benefits Ordinance (2006-58) regarding any roadway alignment if the property is acquired by Conservation Collier. 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Initial Annual Comments Element Cost Recurring Cost Invasive Vegetation $127,600 $47,000 $400/acre initial, $150/acre recurring. 319-acres Removal Cabbage Palm $127,600 N/A $400/acre Treatment $70/1000 slash pine seedlings, $225/1000 cypress Native Plant $22,175 $0.00 seedlings. $1/tree installation. 15000 pines, 5000 Installation cypress Trail/Firebreak Installation and $5,000.00 $1,000.00 Connecting established trails and installing firebreaks Maintenance along property boundaries Interpretive Signage $1,000.00 $0.00 Total $283,375 $48,000 5. Potential for Matching Funds There are no known matching funds or partnership opportunities for acquisition in this area. 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: HHH Ranch Target Protection Mailing Area: HHH Ranch Folio(s): Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points Awarded Points percentage 1- Ecological Value 160 123 77 2 - Human Value 80 60 75 31 Packet Pg. 607 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 3 - Restoration and Management 80 30 37 4 - Vulnerability 80 9 11 TOTAL SCORE 400 221 55 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 120 1.1.1- Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach 100 Dune, 1620 - Coastal Berm, 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric and Mesic Pine Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic 60 60 Flatwoods Flatwoods) c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Mesic a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Flatwoods, Cypress, Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant 20 20 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage communities) Palm, Glades Marsh, Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetlands, b. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 c. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 10 Tillandsia utriculata 32 N N 0 N ri r N 7 El Packet Pg. 608 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 100 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 Red -cockaded Woodpecker, Florida Panther b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c. CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 20 Protects foraging habitat for RCW b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 40 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 33 N N 0 N M r N ZI Packet Pg. 609 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 200 1.4.1 - Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is >_ 300 acres 150 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 50 Conservation easements to the east, PSSF to the south b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 460 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 123 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 120 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 20 b. Fishing 20 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 20 d. Biking 20 20 e. Equestrian 20 20 34 N N O N ri r N 7 El Packet Pg. 610 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 80 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 20 Paved access may become available once Wilson Corridor extension is completed d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 10 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 C. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 Improves aesthetics from 1-75 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 35 El Packet Pg. 611 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 210 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 60 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 45 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities 25 25 (>65%) e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire 20 20 dependent plant communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is 0 incompatible with prescribed fire 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 20 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues 20 20 ATV trespass issues predicted (Please describe) predicted c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 5 (Please describe) d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not 0 feasible 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 0 3.4.1 - Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 0 36 N N 0 N M N 7 El Packet Pg. 612 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 65 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 30 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 5 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 75 acres c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 15 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi -unit residential development 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 20 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 9 37 N N O N ri N 7 El Packet Pg. 613 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 7. Additional Site Photos Hussey Parcels Site Visit Photos 4/21/2021 Representative habitat photos taken on Cycle 10 parcels N N O N v r N 7 Q1 3 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a Mza Packet Pg. 614 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 N categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for N natural resource conservation. "' r N 7 Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. a Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Figure 9. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Map This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. Figure 17: CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in 39 Packet Pg. 615 26.A.15 Initial Criteria Screening Report — HHH TPMA Owner Name(S): Sponseller, Scotti Trust, Guitierrez, Geren Revocable Trust Date: 8/3/2022 the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. N 0 N El 40 Packet Pg. 616 26.A.16 Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub TPMA NGGE Scrub TPMA [� Dombrowiski Parcel �— CONSE� A710N Cp Ctl El Go Con cy {- LLL Target Protection Area Parcels and Acreage: 41 parcels (103.73ac) Applied Parcel Owner(s): Barbara Dombrowiski Folio Number(s) and Acreage: 38666520006 (1.14ac) Staff Report Date: August 3, 2022 Total Score: 267/400 200 160 100 50 80 0 93 6480 6080 el 1 - Ecological 2 - Human 3 - Restoration 4- Value Value and Vulnerability Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Packet Pg. 617 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview.........................................................................................................5 Figure2 - Parcel Close-up.........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................7 Table 1— Summary of Property Information.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score....................................................................................................8 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.....................................................................................8 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates..............................................................9 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value................................................................................................9 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10)................................. 10 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................12 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 12 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities........................................................................ 13 Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 14 Figure 6 — Palmetto prairie/scrub (left) and scrubby pine flatwoods (right) ........................... 15 Figure 7 — Depressional wetland and transitional habitats ..................................................... 15 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 — Listed Wildlife Detected........................................................................................... 16 Figure 8 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 17 Figure 9 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness............................................................................. 18 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 10 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 20 Figure 11 - Collier County Soil Survey...................................................................................... 21 Figure 12 LIDAR Elevation Map............................................................................................... 22 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity........................................................................................................ 23 Figure 13 - Conservation Lands............................................................................................... 24 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 25 2 N N O N M N 7 Q d m r E E 0 U 0 a r_ 0 r N s Q c R J 00 0 M N Packet Pg. 618 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................................... 25 Figure 14 — Off -road trail leading through palmetto scrub ..................................................... 25 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................................ 26 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................................. 26 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................................. 26 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................................. 26 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................................... 29 4. Acquisition Considerations..................................................................................................................29 5. Management Needs and Costs..............................................................................................................29 Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 29 5. Potential for Matching Funds.............................................................................................................. 29 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form......................................................................................................... 29 7. Additional Site Photos.........................................................................................................................35 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions ...................................... 37 3 Packet Pg. 619 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 1. Introduction The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program in its 11th acquisition cycle to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 4 Packet Pg. 620 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 2. Summary of Property Miles NGGE Scrub TPMA Dombrowiski Parcel Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview N N O N M a+ N 7 7 Packet Pg. 621 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Figure 2 - Parcel Close-up N N O N M N 7 7 Packet Pg. 622 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Characteristic Value Comments Name Dombrowiski Barbara Dombrowiski Folio Number 38666520006 Target Protection Northern Golden Area Gate Estates Scrub Size 1.14 acres Section, Township, and Range S5, Twn 48, R28 Zoning Category/TDRs E Estates Existing structures None Adjoining properties Residential Low -density, single-family homes and their Uses Development Plans Submitted None Known Property None known Irregularities Other County Dept None known Interest N N O N M r N a� 2 Packet Pg. 623 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Total Score: 267/400 180 160 160 140 120 100 93 80 80 80 80 64 60 60 50 40 20 0 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and 4 - Vulnerability Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 93 160 58% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 45 53 85% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 11 27 40% 1.3 - Water Resources 11 27 40% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 27 53 50% 2 - Human Values 50 80 63% 2.1 - Recreation 17 34 50% 2.2 - Accessibility 30 34 88% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 3 11 25% 3 - Restoration and Management 64 80 80% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 55 55 100% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 9 23 40% 3.3 - Assistance 0 2 0% 4 - Vulnerability 60 80 75% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 56 58 96% 4.2 - Development Plans 4 22 20% Total 267 400 67% Packet Pg. 624 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire this property, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for the Dombrowiski parcel, which has an initial valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject property and that appraisal report will determine the actual value of the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** Barbara Dombrowiski No address 1.14 $15,732 $38,000 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the Dombrowiski parcel will be obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department before ranking. 9 Packet Pg. 625 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10) Location Description: NGGE Scrub Target Protection Mailing Area (TPMA). Properties are located in North Golden Gate Estates south of Immokalee Rd., east of Everglades Blvd., and between 541h Ave. NE and 481h Ave. NE. Property Description Owner Address and/or Folio Acreage Multiple (see map) Multiple (see map) 41 parcels; 103.7 ac. This ISC covers the entirety of the TPMA for the NGGE Scrub Area. If an ICSR is recommended to go before the CCLAAC in August 2022, the ICSR will also cover the entire TPMA. The map provided includes one (1) recent application. If more applications are received, the parcels will be identified in the August 2022 ICSR. Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Does the property contain native plant communities? If yes, are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities present on the property? (Ord. 2002-63, Sec 10(1)(a) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): Scrubby Flatwoods, Mixed Shrub Wetland, Cypress Ordinance Plant Community Corresponding Priority Natural Community (Florida Cooperative Land Cover System) Presence Tropical Hardwood Hammock Upland Hardwood Forest ❑ Xeric Oak Scrub Scrub ❑ Coastal Strand Coastal Upland ❑ Native Beach Coastal Upland ❑ Xeric Pine Scrub/Pine Flatwood Riverine Oak - ❑ High Marsh (Saline) Coastal Wetland ❑ Tidal Freshwater Marsh Coastal Wetland ❑ Other Native Habitats 2. Does the property offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(b) Yes ® No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): These properties may be accessed from several roads between 541h Ave NE and— 501h Ave NE off Everglades Boulevard North. The parcels offer land -based opportunities for natural resource -based recreation consistent with the goals of this program, including but not limited to, environmental education, hiking, and nature photography. 10 N N O N M r 3 a� Packet Pg. 626 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(c) Yes ❑ No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): N The parcels contribute minimally to aquifer recharge and only a few small area of wetlands occur on a few of N the parcels. cai r Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(d) Q Yes ❑ No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): w r The native plant communities present within these parcels provide habitat for a suite of upland dependent E species and wildlife including the gopher tortoise, Florida panther, and black bear. o 3. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) Yes ❑ No ❑ (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): Parcels are not adjacent to conservation lands and do not provide an ecological link to conservation lands. Any qualified land which meets at least two of the above criteria and has matching funds available and/or which Conservation Collier funds availability would leverage a significantly higher funding rank in another acquisition program. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? Yes ❑ No ❑ If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds significantly increase the rank or funding priority of the parcel for the other agency's acquisition program? Yes ❑ No ❑ MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ❑Yes ❑No The properties satisfy 3 initial screening criteria 11 Packet Pg. 627 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities The properties contain three major vegetative communities with considerable overlap of species. The N primary community is scrubby flatwoods. This community is characterized by a sparse canopy of N Florida slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. densa) which skew towards younger age classes. The midstory is M r notably absent, minus the occasional winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). The understory and a� groundcover is comprised of clumps of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), dwarf live oak (Quercus a minima), muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), various grasses, and patches of bare sand. The second most common community present was palmetto prairie/scrub. This community lacks a canopy or midstory and was characterized by large patches of low (<3ft) saw palmetto with interspersed rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea), dwarf live oak, and grasses. Saw palmetto on these properties have historically been roller chopped by the Florida Forest Service as part of their fuel reduction practices. The scrubby flatwoods and palmetto scrub on these parcels have been identified the Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project as Priority 1 Natural Communities (Figure 4). There is one depressional wetland which is ringed by cypress (Taxodium sp.), coastal plain willow (Salix caroliniana), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), and dominated by pickerel weed (Pontedaria cordata) in the deepest portions. The transitional zone between the wetland and scrubby flatwood includes areas of hydric pine flatwood and wet prairie communities. Additional species found in these areas include laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto) and various sedges and grasses. The upland communities hadve distinctly low invasive plant infestations, primarily single Brazilian peppers (Schinus terebinthifolius) and small patches of cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica) but the transitional areas between wet and dry have a high infestation of mature melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquefolia). *The Dombrowiski parcel contains the deepest parts of the wetland. Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Cardinal airplant Tillandsia fasciculata State Threatened n/a 12 Packet Pg. 628 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski 54TH AVE NE I h 0 0.125 0.25 NGGE Scrub TPMA 0 Dombrowiski Parcel CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities W Priority 1 (highest) L Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4 - CLIP4 Priority Noturol Communities AVE r Miles 0.5 Folio Number: 38666520006 Date:8/3/2022 w z 0.75 CON ATIOH LLIER 13 Packet Pg. 629 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 NGGE Scrub TPMA Dombrowiski Parcel Land Cover Canal Cultural - Lacustrine Cypress High Intensity Urban Hydric Pine Flatwoods Marshes Mesic Flatwoods Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland Palmetto Prairie Residential, Low Density Rural Open Scrubby Flatwoods Miles Shrub and Brushland Transportation Urban Open Land Figure 5 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System CpN ATION � LLIER Co Fer County v 14 Packet Pg. 630 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Figure 6 — Palmetto prairie/scrub (left) and scrubby pine flatwoods (right) Figure 7 — Depressional wetland and transitional habitats N N O N M a+ N 7 7 15 Packet Pg. 631 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities The scrubby pine flatwoods on site provide potential habitat for listed species such as the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), red -cockaded woodpecker (Leuconotopicus borealis), and Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Although not documented on the parcel Florida panther are known to frequent the nearby Panther Walk Preserve (approximately one mile northwest) and are assumed present on the parcel. Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), coyote (Canis latrans), bobcat (Lynx rufus), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and threatened Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) have been reported on the property by a resident on 52nd Ave NE. This site provides nesting habitat for the migratory swallow-tailed kite (Elanoides fortificatus), bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus), wild turkey (Meleagris gallipavo), and endangered crested caracara (Caracara cheriway), among a diversity of other resident breeding bird species. The wetlands on site, including the roadside swale, provide habitat for many wading birds including threatened wood storks (Mycteria americana) and little blue herons (Egretta caerulea). Table S — Listed Wildlife Detected Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Mode of Detection Big Cypress fox Sciurus niger Threatened n/a Observed by neighbor squirrel avicennia 16 N N O N ri r N 7 Packet Pg. 632 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub Florida Panther Mortality Florida Panther Telemetry Black Bear Telemetry Figure 8 - Wildlife Spotiol Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) N N O N M to 7 7 CON aFsWAT10N F4jWLL1ER Co fer County 17 Packet Pg. 633 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Figure 9 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness CA 7BY County N N O N M N 7 Im 7 10 Packet Pg. 634 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.3 Water Resources Aside from the wetland found on the Dombrowiski parcel, these properties do not strongly contribute to aquifer recharge or protect wellfields in the area. They have non-hydric soils and are drained by roadside swales and the Faka-Union Canal which runs along the eastern boundary. Some onsite water attenuation occurs during periods of heavy rain but there are few wetland indicators which suggests a short hydroperiod. The wetter portions of these parcels contain depressional soils with Boca, Riviera, limestone substratum and Copeland fine sands. The depressional wetland and swales provide habitat for aquatic species and wading birds that prey on them. 19 Packet Pg. 635 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666S20006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 0 0.125 NGGE Scrub TPMA 0 Dombrowiski Parcel Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST Priority 2 Priority 3 0 Priority 4 Q Priority 5 0 Priority 6 JA 54TH AVE NE 54TH AVE NE 52NDAVE 0.25 Miles 0.5 Figure 10 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 0.75 CONLEWATION LLIER Goer County 20 Packet Pg. 636 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles 0 Dombrowiski Parcel NGGE Scrub TPMA BASINGER FINE SAND BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAWAND OKEELANTASOILS, DEPRESSIONAL IMMOKALEE FINE SAND hkL MALABAR FINE SAND OLDSMAR FINE SAND Figure 11 - Collier County Soil Survey N N O N M N 7 7 CONLEWATION LLIER Goer County - 21 Packet Pg. 637 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Dombrowiski Parcel NGGE Scrub TPMA LIDAR 2020 Value - High : 104.644 Low :-4.11745 Figure 12 LIDAR Elevation Mop N N O N M a+ N 7 i� 7 CONSE ATION C LLI ER Co ter C.nunty 22 Packet Pg. 638 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity These parcels are not directly connected to any designated conservation areas, however the low - density nature of development in this neighborhood allows wildlife to move relatively unimpeded across the landscape (Figure 13). Although there are no black bear telemetry points recorded near the parcels, neighbors have reported seeing them (Figure 8). Florida panthers have been repeatedly N documented at the Panther Walk Preserve approximately one mile to the northwest. N 23 Packet Pg. 639 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles �J Cycle 11 Parcels 1 Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub Conservation Collier Preserves Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 13 - Conservation Lands N N O N M a+ N 7 7 CON ATION LUER Co fer County '= 24 Packet Pg. 640 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3.2 Human Values 3.2.1 Recreation Unlike most preserves in the area, these parcels provide opportunity to create trails that are dry year- round. A network of ATV trails crisscrosses the parcels and with minimal adjustments can be converted to thousands of feet of hiking and mountain biking loops. Visitors can access the Faka-Union Canal to fish from the eastern parcels. *The Dombrowiski parcel is primarily wetland and is only seasonably suitable for recreation. 3.2.2 Accessibility Street parking is available along 48t"-52nd Ave NE. These parcels are accessible to pedestrians and cyclists coming from the surrounding neighborhood. The majority of these parcels are high elevation and accessible for recreation year-round. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement The open landscape and unique habitat present on these parcels has a distinct aesthetic that will appeal to visitors who are accustomed to hiking in denser woodlands. Figure 14 — Off -road trail leading through palmetto scrub 25 N N O N M r N a� 3 Packet Pg. 641 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Approximately 10-20% of the parcel is covered with invasive vegetation — primarily melaleuca surrounding the wetland and some scattered Brazilian pepper and cogon grass. *The Dombrowiski parcel is approximately 40% infested 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire The parcel contains fire dependent communities and is compatible with prescribed burning. Fuel reduction via roller chopping by the Florida Forest Service has protected these communities from woody encroachment, invasive species infestations, and saw palmetto and cabbage palm overgrowth Reintroduction of fire would consume roller chopped debris, which in turn would promote increase diversity and promote germination of scrubby plant species. Established off -road trails are bare mineral soil and may serve as effective fire breaks. N N O N M r N 7 a� 2 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security There are numerous off -road vehicle trails crossing the parcels. Historically, attempts to prevent off- roader trespass have been ineffective, expensive, and have resulted in additional vegetation damage as trespassers have cut new trails to circumvent the installed barriers. Instead of total prevention, the best method to mitigate further damage may be to attempt to restrict off-roaders to already established trails. 3.3.3 Assistance Based on past investments in fuel reduction, it is like that the Florida Forest Service would assist with prescribed burning on the parcel. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned Estates. This zoning allows for one single family home and one guest house per 2.25 acres. The future land use designation for this parcel is Estates. The upland nature of these parcels makes them especially desirable for development. 26 Packet Pg. 642 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub Zoning General E Figure 15 —Zoning N N O N M N 7 7 CONS ATION LLIER Co fer County * 27 Packet Pg. 643 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Miles Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub Future Land Use Estates Desingation Figure 16 —Future Land Use N N O N M a+ N 7 7 CON ATION LLIER Co fer County '= 28 Packet Pg. 644 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 3.4.2 Development Plans Individual parcels within this area being rapidly developed. This patchy development threatens the ability to preserve contiguous swaths of habitat. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following does not affect the scoring. The following are items that will be addressed in the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners if this property moves forward for ranking. None 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 6 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Initial Cost Annual Comments Element Recurring Cost $350/acre initial, $150/acre recurring. Low overall Invasive Vegetation $35,000.00 $15,000.00 costs are predicted due to the low infestation levels Removal and high accessibility Native Plant $5000.00 , $0.00 Strategically planted trees to influence the path of off - Installation road vehicles Trail/Firebreak Installation and $5,000.00 $1,000.00 Connecting established trails and installing firebreaks Maintenance along property boundaries Interpretive Signage $1,000.00 $0.00 Total $46,000.00 $16,000.00 5. Potential for Matching Funds There are no known matching funds or partnership opportunities for acquisition in this area. 6. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub Target Protection Mailing Area: Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub Folio(s): Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points Awarded Points percentage 1- Ecological Value 160 93 58 2 - Human Value 80 50 63 3 - Restoration and Management 80 64 80 4 - Vulnerability 80 60 75 TOTAL SCORE 400 267 67 29 Packet Pg. 645 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 170 1.1.1 - Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, scrubby 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal Berm, 1630 100 100 flatwoods - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311- Mesic Flatwoods) 60 c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) scrubby a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land flatwoods, Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 20 cypress, palmetto prairie b. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 c. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 10 Tillandsia fasciculata d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 40 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 30 N N 0 N ri N 7 a� 2 Packet Pg. 646 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 40 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 100 1.4.1 - Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is >_ 300 acres 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 100 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 350 31 N N 0 N M a� Packet Pg. 647 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 1 160 93 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 60 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 20 e. Equestrian 20 20 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 105 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year-round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 10 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 32 N N 0 N M r N 7 2 Packet Pg. 648 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 175 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 50 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 120 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 100 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 25 e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire dependent plant 20 20 communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is incompatible with prescribed fire 0 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 20 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please ATV describe) 20 20 trespass c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 5 d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 0 3.3.1- Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 140 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 64 33 N N O N ri N a� i Packet Pg. 649 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 4.1- ZONING AND LAND USE 130 125 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 10 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi -unit residential development 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 135 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 60 34 N N 0 N ri N a� Packet Pg. 650 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 7. Additional Site Photos Saw palmetto, dwarf live oak, and slash pine community Roller chopped saw palmetto N N O N M a+ N 7 7 35 Packet Pg. 651 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Saw palmetto prairie/scrub and scrubby flatwoods Scrubby pine flatwoods with development N N O N M a+ N 7 7 36 Packet Pg. 652 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Wetlands from within the Dombrowiski parcel APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions N N O N M a+ N 7 7 This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Fieure 4 - CLIP4 Prioritv Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential 37 Packet Pg. 653 26.A.16 Initial Criteria Screening Report — Northern Golden Gate Estates TPMA Folio Number: 38666520006 Owner Name(S): Dombrowiski Date: 8/3/2022 Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC N o Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for N M the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many a conservation lands) data. Figure 9. Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Map as r E This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because o SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat Q was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the c entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat 0 models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in s the model is 13. Figure 17: CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. 38 Packet Pg. 654 Conservation Collier Cycle 11 B Property Applications 26.A.17 Property Name Size (ac) Description INDIVIDUAL PARCELS - Non TPMA Owl Hammock (Collier Land Holdings / CDC Land Investments) 7,378.00 Southeast of Immokalee, east of SR29; RLSA-Area of Critic State Concern -Special Treatment Overlay; within proposed Habitat Conservation Plan area Frank / Hothersail 178.78 Adjacent to Picayune Strand State Forest Brewer 14.78 Northeast of Red Maple Swamp Preserve; swallowtail kite nesting and roosting in parcels Rudolph Brothers Ltd 10.00 Camp Keais Strand TPMA PRESERVE PROJECTS & TARGET AREAS Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve Project 20.55 Weir Trust 2.27 1 parcel east of Desoto Blvd. and south of 40th Ave. SE Dibala Wood Trust 18.28 3 parcel east of Desoto Blvd. and south of 40th Ave. SE McIlvane Marsh Project 15.46 Connection Investors Group LLC 5.00 In -holding adjacent to west parcel Relevant Radio Inc. 10.46 In -holding adjacent to east parcel North Belle Meade TPMA 12.50 Hoffman 12.50 Pepper Ranch Preserve Project 59.00 English Trust 59.00 Between Pepper Ranch and Lake Trafford; south of Moody Shell Island Preserve Project 18.50 Dredge Management Assoc LLC 48.50 New owner of Cycle 10 Magdalener Cycle 11B Applications TOTAL 7,707.57 Notes: A "Preserve Project" is an expansion of an existing Conservation Collier Preserve. This property list contains properties with applications submitted. These properties have not yet been reviewed by Conservation Collier staff or CCLAAC members. They will be reviewed by the CCLAAC in September and October 202. CCLAAC ranking of qualified properties on this list will occur in November 2022. c 0 2 a U Q c 0 J ti Go 0 M N Packet Pg. 655 Zr ua3je; aq ll!m uoi;oe ou - aouaaajaa aol ZZ-Z-8 pappd) suoi;eoilddV A:padOJd -8 L L 013AO - 8'L :;uauayoelIV J T `LO a . U 00 U W o � U U � Ln � N Z a Q Oj U m m L!') O6 „ L LO 0 a+ 41 U Y O N d1p CV �� V O V) � N co OR O N OR E CD N m L M a� a� O f6 0- CO L N f0 = d N a U N U f6 O Q p Q O U Q v _ con 0 0 O c W O m m O = (D s LL 0 :E !1,� eti Wai U U� j � N Cl) v «O m r- oo rn U J N o N ED Z r J .. (ZZOZ `£;snBnV - 0844ivaua03 tiosinpd uoi;isinboV pue- : L80£Z) sdew 91OA3 - 3•L :;uOw ell J ti V N� CO M O �: C CO N N i> co 7 U U O to d m U U M CD M O +Vd QVf6 NU E OO M LO Lm a) U J•-OOO OLNU O i M OL UNO O_ Q� C� ` -MOU D N — U O N O �?: V � Q O 0-(n a)r M > OF C = N t L Q N °� U V Ur U U U Q Q m O U O (Q] C VUi N O N _O � N O X- U O N Q C7 N >C O N = O U N N O T T (/i m 0 0 (n O N = M Z Q > L i Q C N i C N 06 7 7 U U i U — C C i� M� N �� i Lo: O� r-� (6 W OL O �� N CC L O 07 QC) V)Co _ O J � U 9 U) o N 0 I (ZZOZ `£ }snBnV - aall!w aoo AiOSInpV uoi}isinb3V pue-1 : L80£Z) sdew 6 013AO - O•L :;uauayoe};dco 00 N N 7 0- U H d N M Lo lL _M U U ) U U i i i to N Q N U N Co Co f6 O i J Q N ._ O V fA fA fA fA O fA U U O (0 N mfA 'O (n N = V Ov ? O O_ C -O O N 0 0 0 U U � O E m f>p O O_ Q O� i� U O O CO (p N N O m d7 T Lo C O C C O O C O O O f6 a Q U E > O O 2 .� (n M Q N U O� O �' U !L vl w O O (6 O C vi vi vi vi vi Cu O _ �_ t Q N oij U U -O U U = O- Q j m O O lL E E N c N U i y C i O X m O U U U E O E E O O E O O U O >, U >+ cn mrn 0 (Ao tL °' °' _� M LO Z Q U > Q c N c mm °� U U U U U U U i 1- N � i M Mom. N LO i Lo�. CO N f� � O co Q O �� N � C L O 0)U C Q (n Q V �L U) 0 .N .E E /0 V 0 L a. Q r r c.i V M o � N 0 �ZZOZ `£;snBnV - aa;;ivauao3 tiosinpd uoi;isinboV pue� : L80£Z) sdew �� OPA3 - 3-L :;uauayoelly Q Q QWN � O N CO N N p O N N O coN 7 n- U U ... ,_ V U m d _M m co U N m a) O Q = fA m Q O O a N U O E E U m -O m O � U 2- O O i O co m O_ N•' O d N L O fA N � Y CO m m �i = U � ` Q C C v m fA O CO fC p C U O m OL mm to Q NCO i� m O UO U) fA O m (6�M.O-„ Op a U ,O O O m: E O O > O O (q a I U7 �� :)O > mN U O � m N2�? �U J N Q O� u) E ° 2 a 06 m� 2 V LlJ �� U am U = " a m f6 c O man- m j 0 0 O = 'm m m m 3 x- U m m m C7 E coo = L a C706 ° U �y L O U U (/) m O (/) O O N = m >� > i i m Q N N c U O N m m ' c N 0 0 V/ o O U O T U U U NC M� c � Cl) Cn� CON Q �� W Q O) �� N N �QUU)U)Q � 9 o N 0 Conservation Collier Cycle 11A Active Acquisition List to be ranked by CCLAAC 26.A.19 Property Name Size (ac) Estimated Value Estimated Value per acre Staff Proposed List Category Staff Comments INDIVIDUAL PARCELS - Non TPMA H C & J S Adams Trust 4.34 $18,000 $4,147 C Difficult to access, very low vulembility and small size TPMA PRESERVE PROJECTS & TARGET AREAS Caracara Prairie Preserve Project 4.54 $54,500 Hugh Starnes 4.54 $54,500 $12,004 A Allows close access to Caracara Prairie Preserve from District public parking lot County Barn Road Area 5.00 $432,000 County Barn Land Trust Parcel 5.00 $432,000 $869400 A Difficult to access and small size, but adjacent to CE in rapidly developing area Dr. Robert H. Gore HI Preserve Project 5.72 $126,000 Pedro Perez 1.17 $259000 $219368 A Expansion of existing preserve in Golden Gate Estates R F Berman Trust 1.14 $249000 $219053 A Delsina Trigoura 1.14 $24,000 $21,053 A Donna Colon & Patricia Mack 2.27 $53,000 $23,348 A HHH Ranch (Section 33) Area 26.46 $2079000 Robert Sponseller 5.00 $479000 $99400 A High ecological value Mary Scotti 8.74 $619000 $69979 A Jonathan Geren 7.84 $55,000 $79015 A Michael Gutierrez 4.88 $44,000 $99016 A Marco Island Parcels 3.721 $5,611,000 Annecy Marco LLC 2.13 $29783,000 $1,3069573 A High listed wildlife value and vulnerable to development Diane Chestnut 0.53 $450,000 $849,057 A South Terra Corp 0.56 $19975,000 $3,526,786 A S & B Properties of Marco LLC 0.50 $403,000 $806,000 A Northern Golden Gate Estates Scrub Area 1.14 $389000 Barbara Dombrowiski 1.14 $389000 $339333 B Small size; B-list in case adjacent parcels apply Panther Walk Preserve Project 6.18 $2529000 Andrea Repola 1.14 $45,000 $39,474 A Preservation of Horsepen Strand R F Berman Rev Trust 1.17 $47,000 $40,171 A Maurice J Vaz 1.59 $70,000 $44,025 A Patricia McGinnis 1.14 $45,000 $39,474 A William J and Martha Scalley 1.14 $459000 $39,474 A Rivers Road Preserve Project 0.50 $359000 Matthew Van Cleave 0.50 $35,000 $70,000 A Adjacent to Rivers Rd - high risk £or development RECOMMEDED FOR RANKING SUBTOTAL 57.60 $6,773,500 Red Maple Swamp (NGGE Unit 53) Multi -parcel Project (remaining) 69.40 $867,500 $12,500 A Winchester Head Multi -parcel Project (remaining) 69.00 $1,138,500 $16,500 A Multi -Parcel Projects Total 138.40 $2,0069000 Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve area - Preserve expansion parcels* Panther Walk Preserve area - Preserve expansion parcels* 120.30 33.60 $29649,968 $1,3709107 $22,028 $409777 A A parcels in these areas would only be acquired if budget remains after all other properties acquired. Preserve ex ansion parcels total 153.90 $4 020,076 CYCLE 10 B-LIST FOR RECONSIDERATION Agua Colina - Marco Island 0.63 $1,427,000 $2,2659100 A A -list if south Tema Corp is also A -list Big Hammock -Area II (Barron Collier Partnership) 744.2 $1,116,300 $1,400 C Permanent SSA Agreement on this property. Once SSA Agreement isextuingished sta£fwould recommend acquisition. Sanitation & Bethune Rd Parcels (Barron Collier Partnership) 370.00 $3,900,000 $10,500 B More due diligence needed before providing a recommendation. Phase 1 on order. Cycle 10 B-LIST TOTAL 19114.831 $6,443,3001 $5,800 Note: a "Preserve Project" is an expansion of an existing Conservation Collier Preserve. *Preserve expansion parcel acquisition is based on budget availability. N N O N M N 7 Im 7 E�q a Packet Pg. 660 CD N QN N N � (Y) a-+ D bA El `£;snfnd - 0011! WOO fdOSInpV uoi;isinbo�y pue-1 : L80£Z) sisAlBuV 6uDIJOM L4 OIOAO - O•L :;uGwt43BIIV Q V O C O O O O O O O O O O O O N O .1 N n M O 'o 0 O m C LO I� V3 O H3 Ln r H3 V> O 7 V> O (O (A O N EA O EA O EA O N N O W m O EA V N V N O M O N (fl M O Vj m y E c fA fA 64 K3 o a m v L �_ .2 O O Q M V W O O O O O M N O o u� O O M (O M o O O O O � O M r 7 O V) W u� � W Q4 1 M � to 64 O (O fA (o fA to to N m _ Q o I e3 t» » of » 0 F C U r_ C O O O O o O o O o O N O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o Lo N O O m U O x O (O O uO D) N M m O O N O N O N (p N N O (O 7 W ^ V OJ l0 O N E U » » » » » ea » va » » » a » ev WO x W d a m (j i 'O U V O c o 7 (o N O N t` (p O M O O O co (p N lD O o (D O M M ("5 a (D O o O O o ll� N o lA (d N O N O Lo O N r m m E V3 W EH N V3 ui ER (vj A lo M V3 EA ER EA EA N EA V EA H3 N fA W d O) m N_ V M V V (ti V O O lti N I- uo O M N O N O (D It -I O O u-, O V O N cD O Lo O O ol O O � OM N O O O M N -t M O o Qy N CM') r U O O Lo o o O O N O r O O W O 7 O m O N O O o N N M O QOi OM O V i-q H3 _ y m 0 O F U (A O O CD N O O N N (D N No N o N 4-11lA N N N N (D N I- N r N 7 N (D N I--N N t` N N N l0 N a) O V m N M O (D O 7 D) m to V (D N (D N (D O (D coV to (D (D to (D to O 7 W lD n 7 O N (D C 3 7 (n C a m E O N V (D O I� co O f� O O o O V V N M O W V N I� O N m 4 C 3 V oo ID 7 M M W W (fl O M (D (D oo (fl W N C Vi C 'f O) 2 (D (D M (o M an M 7 M O ID M M (D M M N O M 7 ID M M m M _ i J rn m o(� O a3) rV^ r (D r N -ItM N M M n I N r r 00 N O -f O m U J W fA N y m 1 J :_. C N m V -:5 C a O 0 Co y N N o J 2 N O m a � .tm a) o a) � c/) J o m m J o i E a) - E m H 'c -D E m o Z. c a m m (� E m L U F m m a> o U) m0' 2 g m m c a m C LL u) L 2 O L C C m N LL LL❑ N C L o U T m ❑ O O N 2 .0 m Q 2 E N m D y a L .6 DO _U x C U) D r N m .O m IL .... C O m N Q O LL m U U m C Uo o o a m LL m m x- o n m j C m =_ N O C w N C O L E Ft O ❑ 06> > C w O (n C U) C m m o E x U c d o f LL a m J = C m m 3 o O = F U m y m Z m 2—E m N U lii Q U a Co J ❑ m U C � a U C d U o a�i d Q d '6 m m C m E �2 m m d E LL z75 N d m m U mm a s E m E E mo o o O m ¢ m` LL Q a m 0 m 3 am x °` O a Y a m Y Q a E x r . m o � , x m n m m r m m ° N U (n o° m v m r m a _ E E m y otS x o w O � g o U x L) J c i 0 = 2 z a � of� _ o a in rn ao N m Co - aa;;iu WOO AJOSIApbr uoi;isinbod pue- : L80£Z) sis�(Ieud 6uiIaoM �� OJOAO - 3-L :;U8wt43e;;d N N N NN `. CD d N � � On 0 c o LO oLLI G t°1 0 IVC d O m w � � 0 Q-`J �° ata G` ac'a ♦�` e > i �� G� Qip1 �C O N G°Jo P a�Ge a�a" ♦Q ♦`'♦ C�`J co tG G0 N ♦ 5 mac � a a N yeet``oyo � �GrQ' OQ�oQ G0♦♦`ec. a 5 > ♦y♦a'� a�"O ip1e � d co ° �� ♦Q air P at°o T C V 0 N < O c y��i 0�� Q 0 v N W C ♦ate re 5 o o` r' U C.)N M ata Cbo ��Jw tea, rey o05 u ♦`'♦a eG 5`a� ♦5 o H Cl) N +Q. ♦y♦ d Cl) Q�°,o a�a� t� $N N Q jb; c�♦o off. a ♦Q ,pc cv Q o a� O d` a 0 ata �0 e i � G N v ,pe��. Oapa ♦y0a� d N e♦y U � G `'ot Jae Qaj U to N 0& �a N >_ N ♦* o � +� u O u 0c r c +r Q m Q O � i N i d d Q) r O O O M O O O O O O LO N N O u U IL 20 `£;snfnd - aa;;iu WOO AJOSIApbr uoi;lsinbod pue-1 : L80£Z) sisAIeud BUPIJOM 6� OIDA3 - 3•L :;u8wt43epv i A CD 40 CD CD CD Q Q CD le N O coo (D le N r r T T G\ems Jao e� r cl- o e iole o��aiG yet `ey aaQie Qi Qe� 0 �o Q� \y\a AS' o)" �a�a o Paa�y �aiG 0aio r7 eon ti6 4t�°Jo .�G \y\acaPiea Baia° � oaa o �a a iQ G° iao go y'�c ear \1`a aca, G,ce Qi�\ \y\ ace ae\ yam` aia° �aiao 5�a� i aia oea� i ey a�\e �a e\Qi a � r eat Pie Q,ai 1`J�, \ei•• G GO��a 1`eaa� e ioe Q�aii°� y`c�Q1 yti ye \y ce Aare e ie Qaiae iQa� Q e G° ata e\y aia r�o 0o Q is aiaa Q�e'� �aii �+Q• Qa iea ee`a a�a a� io a \ ear 5 boK, Qio� ceye eke � \o ae Q-° Piea ar Co N Q N N co 0 N [V m Z3 W I 20 v 0 u c O N c O u `£;snfnd - aa;;iu WOO AJOSIApbr uoi;isinbod pue-1 : L80£Z) sisAIeud BUPIJOM 6� OIDA3 - 3-L :;u8wt43upv i zi 0A �a e Paa�y G° . e°�\ �1 5 tea Qt°� �. �G4t Q-°a ate `fie Qtpi tGe\y �,A �Q toe\ Qa OR o G r eV e`er o t°� at` aAe ��1` Gee eye ce 0 t Q'Qt09 at`° teye � y � aQ ey Q.o ma > e°A ate° Q•�� a 2 CIO at` � ta setrt°� they �y �r to to o � �Ci at°o ° a at O° J� at`e`y I`e Q �atGO tea e tp1 G at`a ��GtJ Q eyet� a t°,e t Qteyet yr�Q1 aorta �`` met Gata G°te SlIq e .et c ° G°`\ o�ej`� Q- ea tto °t` �t Qt �a att Q-a� tea ce�y � a r 0 a'a 5 000 CD CD M N CD O 1O co LCD CO N QN N �p O N [V m Z3 W I 20 v 0 u c 0 v c 0 u `£;snfnd - aa;;iu WOO AJOSIApbr uoi;lsinbad pue-1 : L80£Z) SISAIeud 6UPPOM 6� OJOAO - 3•L :;u8wt43epv zi CD co Monosson co IMonson co Monson MMENSE co co LO SENSE SENSE SENSE SEEMS :MEN co soon loss CD co MEN co OEM loolsomm CD co Monosson CD co loommoss CD co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M I- W LO It M N T- Jao red �a Pte tole oor eyQt et at O QaGe� G t Oaa Q Q- a . e •�o `y`a� �tJy� Qtp1 tca�o at°° a'�y ye�e o��e •.Q1 �` Pa Qte tole tyr G� G°te atGe tQa� �. Q e 5 �Oa �Q too Sao Ot g�a fat at° yet eal G°p tt°o Q-e OG� a' �.� Pte e�5 ata �a as ato Q 0�Ab r� pro e e G°O� Oe 4P 0 K4 ak`�`a��o Qteyea� 00,E G'`\e�a � et�a`� Oates e`Qta�e tir ea ca o t a GG� �eaa a t°o met 0 a ey G 011, CL` \ao Qt tG �y ��O GOcQ \a�a, �etta at�e5 `' �aAG a r ee�� °fir `y\ao G �ea at°° Ora Qtp1e �` tea' tie at°° y`a t` Qteye to to Ga LO CD CD a m �a a `g;snfnd - aa;;lu WOO AJOSInpV uoi;lslnboV pue-1 : LSOCZ) slsAleuV 6uiMaoM 1, alOA0 - :D•L :;uewLj3ej4v _0 z v 0 U c O L v O U 0 u ca L m m Y C m w CoCD CD CD CD CD CD CD I- (O LO Iq M N O CD i`' QaZ` et G° ii Oa a11" Pie aim °*5 , Jy� o � a O`�.Z. SPaa Qioe° eG�a� ♦`ei ,. ea e o1 G°♦ 1` acor Qiee e is ie Q io1e tea. a°a ai 1`' to Ge♦ �` 5 G .? o •e e �e ear Qa oI iG Q-° �O 41 e♦Qi Qa 0 a� aia �tQ '•'�`a'` lea ♦'�`� a�a �` �. Lei �.a ec, re5 i°-3 e �a eke Oo�'p a� �a♦ Qiee i aia Oai G° �G Qa��r Gi��Q, aPiea aiG �. a 00 Q"oa °♦�� °� Ae G 5 G♦ea G na a Q��'OQioQ i� e Jam o ♦at. G° r� aiG ♦e a y4t �eiia �a♦� 0 5 ion aiG ,�a'a J'�• ♦�` ♦y♦a yer' e�� aiG0 aQie Gre >G 0 CIO tea, oA ro Q' aia e♦a•C� O iG �a `E;snfnd - aa;;lu WOO AJOSInpV uoi;lslnboV pue-1 : L80EZ) slsAleuV 6uiMaoM 1, alOA0 - :D•L :;uewLj3ej4v _0 i A v O U c O N c O U �+Q xy Q0� Qa i�O� oQa� aQo ipt toO .+, oo 65£$ saj�oQ`aa 0V a ``, o ro \ ��Q�•a CL \oaG o �� o 0g9$ o C.) ; o0 059$ . b,� � � • pj � 999$ �� 0 000` l $ G `o�` Quo a e O �. � �� 'VI W LV0` �$ 5a �a i� a G as NNE v a�a as Go o�Q G v G gP Ja c � � o`j G o��a Eti8` 4$ - 1`G E o 5 4- io a Qio J0 cn a w a W SL 4 `£$ a\a 5 ey ,ac �L5`E$ lac `yNeV `a� 0 O G 0� iG�a v 000`V$ 0 QA,oG aiG o c � 000`V$ �a �0aa c�oG 000`B$ G0 aA O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6q O O O (::O O O O O LO O LO O Lf) O LO Et} 6q f) Efl Gq Efl fi-? - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O•L :}uewt43e;}d M. Le la t" cl A M V U U T Y O 00 � � (6 3 C O_ O O c O �q'°m l+ N a Ln O a) ° m a ❑ 0 0v U °� =5 O (n rn = > N � u r U Q ti O O O m n > � w O O O O O O / O u N ••C U N N Cd Sti N N bA O _N O N 6RWD -a °U 4; O >1 WD O � ii � � y 3•r N � � ~ N t o 0 -6 0O O O cd O c � bq n � � � o OU 00 O X! U O U O y 69 N m "O U ;0 N N 4 O H 9 u O N O O� �"+ O r 4 U N O0 y0 N .o N N N U ° "O N O cd � — �3 o uo V w � cd O O U _ 0 U N o •- 4--- U i--, COC CA N E. m •C"" N O v'en 0 O it .ti N H N U N~ to y O Q CA ^� O O 3 N V y v' u O Qr O O O o C aN 00 a1 a. V m a. MW LM V U U - aa};iu WOO i(aosinpd uoi;isinb3V pue-1 : L80EZ) pauigwoo saiaewwng A:padoad - 6-�3-L :;uauayoejjv I 0 mwPL m w w COLLIER BLVD _ w a m E ¢ O N J N Q U W 0 c c .` Q o o m co is o u c - U U o o L I U U U O 1 1 V M N Lo (11 0 M M o w MW U U U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d U Q N N N O N M U ri vl O "> c � W U a a� o 0 03 a 03 cd U ;5 — O o � A� Ei E0 xi o 00 a, ,y c m ; c 0 c - aw o C) coo E o oo o 00 m c 'N O7 0 N rn ❑ Q) Ol � 0 u 10 Y C 0 Ul " a 'm^ m w o = "a j N Q N ■ ID u O j O ID w> ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 lD N O 00 tD -0 N N � �". cd O O O O y y O 4� 4UD _bo CD � ° U U ao o cd U N cp to r., N 69 "C tw� _ O moo x > oo ON U ° N _ UD Ln U O'er Q i �69 U N 12. N o °' m O W > W°O uo �-' ° a0 � UD W 'a o �' o 0 U o.5 A.� �D �.� cql ,erg3 yi� iA c p ^� N Z p •+^"+CZ • O �� s. � �� D � _T � w C4.1 .�'r Ct �,� UB UD O Cd 0 ��Uw on > cl, on�� O `O A� � a� a Q a� ' o � � � -WD C °� �� 'i. A a o o 4.W a x a �w �,� U U a O a? as • • • • • • • • 0 ti CD 6 a d V m a N d N MW A V U U - aa};iu WOO i(aosinpd uoi;isinb3V pue-1 : L80EZ) pauigwoo saiaewwnS A:padoad - 6-M-L :;uauayoe;}d rc; 0 cr W Q U Y K 0 U 0 M a SN2lO�:i - - - N M. Le t" U U U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O•L :}uewt43e;}d o 00 N c O 0L O C v o v O\ o O �^ ° a N m v ❑ L v� a O 00 c U 1° O a V a) }' -70 U O 7 rl � OM W c-I ■ 00 O 00 O O Ln N c ILn N ti CD a1 a d V m a MW LM Id uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Aljadoad - g-M-L :}uOwt43eRV a tt x U x u x w r w c3 � z w lz d HIAaNVS � � y cc j � L cc d111B13SFif1S w F = 4Jt�9# iV9kiV94j1NV P I QO Al9aDA-VhoJ G� a NZ N3M]3kl; UNlSYV51AY � cr v z Q W o ' � � s � a 4�4 NbdB AINM-) O °e (1 LLI w 2 LO � } v o o lai a�+vilaarl J c LLJ SnaalO A��IU7��k! � ¢ v1 f4h 0A79 VZ�31RIb - O -'w 3i 6NtyAi GAR 4 � OA�B 3NV^{ S°JF1171 x AVAh S�)NtM ❑hlfl 117NMH G4 MOLOKAI � �6.13�3NL139 W CO) I - CO d d Y V R d - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d M M 3 N U N U CA o U Cd "a U U U Y o 0 v 0 5 v }' 0 0 0 0 a 0 N v v N m � Co v aJ O 00 c 'n —R v 0 Q LO N ci w > H 0 0 0 0 0 O Ln i N r- ti CD 6 a d V m a M M U a U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O-L :}uewt43e;}d a. 4.1 O °U O N cz O U ct N 3-i 3-y � U N _N O N M O n O macz 12.4.1 O O bA N Cdxi '� O U m ° a° UD mW o 0 bo O -C U O U O Q O rA ¢, O N O N ~ y � �bA Q. � N O ,s 0 .. UD ° o �+ O '" N O � V � U Q, t 6 U o LO ti CD 6 a d V m a I 26.A.21 I CCLAAC Conservation Collier Property Summary Cycle 11A Parcels Near Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve August 3, 2022 Dr. Robert H. Gore Preserve TPMA conservation Collier Preserve Donation Offer Pending Appraisal Pending Application Received 1 - Berman Trust (1.14 ac) 2 - Trigoura (1.14 ac) 3 - Perez (1.17 ac) 4 - Mack (2.27 ac) 0.5 'I M!Ies :COLLIER e3 Cou34ty l . Packet Pg. 676 1 - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d M M s G ,e V U U g�y� was {F� E:�J� � > c o c d o c '2 w N O co o c ra ti � m m z c m O d N �^ � ❑ v � o 6 Cc:.r N ? > o 6 N O v N V � m O m ti w > ti � O O O O O O u1 O u1 N c-I a -I a� O °ct t03 0 o o m o 03 ° CA Obn U o� > o 0 cn w .� v c,3 a j ^ �� w y cOC ct 4 > �, U cd °ct>, bA o ... O U 4- U O Q. bA U m o ° .o. U o o U• U o> O w to ro. as y "� 00 04 m to to bA . .o m - cd a, O o bp U o bD ° N v U N ° a N v 0 -- ri �" ° ¢ >, to C/) w u c o °a'a ° waa C4 > to o O bbb O O O O N C-)4 x ti ti CD 6 a d V m IL - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d M U N P o Ncd bQ CAOD A bA 0 N t O N O UD O N CE M rx" W N >� M N cd N U U y v S" S N U 4S N cis O n O O "". O "a m 4" C) y0 U N m C4 N a -� �-4 �xo0 a N u x 0� O O U lu o Z M a o o C, a � °' o v1 U m -� o ro U O Q. O ° U Q o Q. , �, y •� U . g! o C,3 o cqs o P, .a on Q p oo uA� 4. o o °s.' o a�i .00 to M N— y 0 N Ci M �� a� ci bA C�3 cz: O cUi� O N M -a " v G V V V H P. • G� to u U o Coo Coo c� one �� U C Q Q 0 a 6 U a o 0 0 0 0 U U co ti CD 6 a. d v R a. I 26.A.21 I CCLAAC Conservation Collier Property Summary Cycle 11A Parcels Near HHH Ranch August 3, 2022 Application Received 1 - Sponseller (5.0 ac) 2 - Scotti Trust (8.74 ac) 3 - Gutierriz (4.88 ac) 4 - Geren Trust (7.84 ac) N N O N v r N 7 t� 7 El CON ATION LLIER CACT County b Packet Pg. 679 1 N d N - aa};iu WOO i(aosinpd uoi;isinb3V pue-1 : L80EZ) pauigwoo saiaewwng A:padoad - 6-�3•L :;uauayoejjv M M U cd 03I V N CMS V C� U a o � ° MMM � N C� a I M O M U O� O O O M oc r— ,a N 6�4 0 U Z, o c � v m � a C � O_ C C a N 0 O 00 m E D 41 0 M 00 M ) C 0 0 m N ❑ v 4J � L Q m CO In 00 C0 C d m v - N Q U_ tD � OJ OV f0 > � w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 V N O 00 CO V N r-1 c-1 c-1 e-1 -4 0 � �Q 0 CE 69 C�$ O Qp U -cl wti > cct bo �+ > N p G> it bo O . - N Z a:cC ;, N L"i U -- O a -Z �b�A "O^ o 4�o U _ _ . O .� �oct N Q t, 69 4EO 0 Cd O O N O c O O o a 0-0 M y.� N o a v W° `�-d M it Uj N55 N 0 z u C,3 ylu rn cd to U 0 C7 lu C,: r"d Ino -� cz ° `� o .� o 0 o .� �' °ioa��A��o� om y v e o 6+ cd O� x CC O C y �' Pr O O to -� to Os: N Cd to Cd 0 Cd N '> ^ 0 �o M cd = U WD to O ;3 $�- 0 c O V cno /� O " N roj p S o O N G� C�3 t o to + to roj N n d 1211 0 00 CD Cb a d V m a - 00}}ivauao0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6o-L :}uewt43e;}d a m gill m ` C N .O L N m O o m a m y N SOOTT OR � 3 w E INLET OR Q af�lMMVH ao L () 3lNI S r o caa5 � o, z " 'o ¢ z a 3 u dbye _ h O tt 0 157IHOWS f i w 0) a d r m a. O N M M Le U U U - 00}}ivauao0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d PE! .o 0 o O c� oz > m o O�" U o Q 0 o 0 u m o �c oU x • T O W � N C a � v v C c y 00 E c OC m ° a° w co m �w z � m a° N ❑ N L O 0) N c i O In 0 a �00c m -o E v = 3 N Q O1 O i t0 � N u h0 M 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00 w V N O 00 10 d' N Q ° W o _ Q O o 0 a > o E >1- a cd ct ;3 _m M 03 y b C ° 0 � c°i Con o� ° Z :: o `A o 4--' 4-o roj O � o ' cUi j a U � W o o ,� Z U y N MGM >> ZA a O O � ^Cd ~ •4mm� b°A CQ V 0 'Gun Ln -d a °' A nn 4 � Q a o o o •� s. U ct ... s°� ej r- ,w�N�n� • • • • • • • • • • • N 00 CD a1 a. i V m a. a mWtUoD AJomnpVuq mnb Vpue-1 :LSOCZ pemgwo s NemwnS Aaedod-6�O- :4uemt43e n¥ g ! j \\> 0 »&o k�� ■ E @ 0 = 7 L) \ � \ » \„ _, { \ Le u � ; 0 ) a �\ _ G 2 f a \ a - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d M M W, U U U • � o 0 v N C v C O c N N a 0 O 00 00 � a)O O h0a m M 00 0) c I1 1 N m ao v � 3 � @ N O o > U 00 C o ul) m a m E -a _ � m :3 x v � N 3 0 _U UO v Ulu N > W rl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W l0 S N O W to IZT N rl ci c-I c-I c-I O O O ;y Ln U r.., O 4 -4 ° C -C sus Oa3 _o �9 U C4 U �'� '� U O y bq cd O a) cn to r^ cti 4) U O ct -. cd O ct CA cm � �" r. bA m U � 4,,tj O o O O O 0 0 O tb U y N cn N Q" U o a) ; O o °�� >� ° � ( O .- 0 E - N1a�O� aI un N O m C7 O cd a) ii O '� w N '� 0 bA sU aM .O c, 6� � U� r. O � V- O U O >1 U C C ej CA el C ej U o • • • • • • • • • • • • 00 CD a1 a. d U R a. N Q N Q U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O-L :}uewt43e;}dLO �I 00 a m � as QJ V O 111 W C ` C N 0 L R O o a m N (n SCO DR w ++ m C MV �4R L9 INLET OR Q MfC lMMVH - � �06 q4 a4131N1 � S ' aOVWNYaO � __ b0 �7NlM g ua�000 o � x `g g p di � on w 1D NNISH3d -'� LO N O 0 N CD 0) a d m a. - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uol;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) poulgwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d M M U U U A O 00 N � N lD C N C a-1 O C C � 0 O Cl) N 00 i 0 -6 m o C pp c V) M � v O a N ❑ a1 � a U oho cn cm _ > a N O to U � jro Q O w > O O O O O O Lr) O Lr) N c-I c-I O U N � O O 0 �oc O U p a> O M N U a N M t O Vl W U y r O �O Z O `+ N u > CGyO& �sL cd m � � c� C3 p 4- 2 O � y c6 M � m to �' O = N � aj � c� a�i iw o . o o x o - mo o o �,o� cl °w ° ¢'O o •� UU �o;3 �yo fn i Z � ° � IL) ° �, s9 -� wo'on a~ O � �° a O Z 3 V� •� ° a v � W `� ai �" Np O a a1 Q O yam. Q• Pr O N +4 N A- 3 O O y U �+ O W m N cn y �� w a � o U U o `� o c c ar �°. o �; alaM C-) u aW Ss. A� Ei E0 xi 00 CD a1 a d V m a t - aa}}ivauao0 AGosinpd uol;isinboV pue� : L80£Z) poulgwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6o-L :}uewt43e;}d l �I '00 I a m c a g p w o UC V fl. gillC o m O � a m Q1 � N SCOTT OR 3 w E INLET OR Q Mfo,MMHH - U YJ �06 `— — \� an i3lNt S 1J xe o g aa� g � WK m 2 ti U ti H I K 0 o' '� t� a 7�LLri SppD 157IHOWS p 1'J lti db� 5�\pJj ��P 0� 10 NNISH3d V O N CID a d m N Q U M U U U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O'L :}uewt43e;}d 0 co @ O aj � y y i 0 0 O O Y 6 E a 00 \ O (6 I ` � 0 W C CL N m L ❑ L- O o c f6 ,n c U00 0 t/) = > Ln v �1 L u Q 0 N k ti O � m rn w > 0 0 0 0 0 o N -4 o n c-rl U v) ,� 4- bA cd O c�3 ; ��- 4� to N 3 C7, Q.oCd d ;� U4� > 14 N c N v U ci N N c > O .Z ,� mQ N . Z m 1=4 142 Wy° a� �" a o 0 o co U v o � a� it OU DC 00 y �" �O �" O w nn i� 3 M Z m -o o Z Z A a: a O O 8 U � N W 6 � � � U � Q.)� � y � � � C': wu, � m � N�. w > as 4.4 W N a� 4, o� o i�Uw ai >cl a o u A �;w .% c oU > 5= w.0 0 M cq ... c� Q O c� P" O O '- iOr U p ... Ja x ak a o � U "s 1423 � x 00 00 CD 6 a m V m IL MW w V U U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O-L :}uewt43e;}d Me an 00 w d r+ d Y V R d N Q N M M t" it U U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O-L :}uewt43e;}d Me N N O c� larm N 03 9 N 0 o (° ti on aoi N Ct o 0 0 0 0 ;3 O o N y cd c4 O CA ct zolm�C: a, z cti O o �ct M � - to �� O •��" U +- N v� N r N y it o O �+ V cd N y moo.., E �— a `p N N O o � Z U Cl kn + O U N o 00 ' OF v o v o o -- m v N ID 8rw On v O m w o N n O 4J c Q Wo E j N C U �' m = a (/) m > N � O � `O � O � o °' Q � 3 ■ ti w > N 00 O 00 O CD Ln N -1 cl y O v� O O O '� • -Ct +� C C4 o 0 •° w� CIO o O O 4� uo *� O U OU ct O 0 w O r - ,s ct OCt N O Sti cn N N coo N U cd cd �"� N O O U O O0 •.�. a«O a sue- y U'� o cdU�O N a o cd CIO 3•r I--1 N cd -C ram+ N cdo Z UD N � U C,3 UD .r U � N � MC�3 '60 it O rA Cm 0 v O a • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 CD 6 a d m a I 26.A.21 I CCLAAC Conservation Collier Property Summary Cycle 11A Parcels Near Panther Walk Preserve August 3, 2022 N N O N M r N 7 01 7 El T` 0 0.5 1 CoiLier County Miles Packet Pg. 691 1 M M U U U - aa}}iu tUO0 AGosinpd uoi;isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) pouigwoo saijewwng Apedoad - 6-6O•L :}uewt43e;}d U � U U o � O � OCIO O cd °as cd d �/ bA v CA 00 0fn m y0 in. �n in o u cq moo.'° o a CV a W A� Ei Ei xi • O 0o cn � N > C O o o z- a)0 E 2 p oo v -0 m p N ro m c o v � o O E a c 00 cn m > 4- N f6 !O .o 3 0 v r o > w > O O O O O O Ln O Ul N c-I c-I O U Ci bIJ O U .� ° °'"E Ct U 03 Q O 4 ct ct 0 U 3 " 03 N U > 69 > u cud —0 N O ct 03 O U bA U 03 x c,3 U m up Ln Wj cct03Cn Ra " M �+ U G� •" ° v� N O O ) � O O z ct O O -C w� CA 04 U O a> O v U O6 p U ~— OU >, UUO� �wN �n�� In, � �-0 • • • • • • • • • • N 0 to 6) d r+ d Y V R d N d N MW U U U R P a W Y - aa};iu WOO AJOSIApd uoi;isinb3V pue-1 : L80EZ) pauigwoo saiaewwng A:padoad - 6-M-L :;uauayoe;}d 7 m 2 O a o z u ¢ w MIUL DER DR U LU Y W U7 R 8 1S SlIWH31a , z L. c U, 0 Q 0 0 O w M N Q N Z O uoi;isinb3V pue- : 180£Z) sIG3.aed uoisuedx3 anaasa.ad - 4 M'L :;uauayoeUV a ti j c t0 (B v N � I , L O C\j co U) U N a N } (6 I� Ln m ULO LO (B = Q � Ocm 6 O U •U O (D O C + a U x O 0- 0 < a. Jell 111111111111101 LnU) o� WE - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 06 eloA3 saiaewwnS Aj.IadOJd - UO-L :;uawLi M Le IF'. U U U Y 00 v N r_ a o c ar a OOp -0 N \ O O v— N GO M OO O Lr) 0 L O00 C � N Y E •0 C/i rn = > d _ m H 3 75CD a U_ O 7 W > c-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w lD �t N O w to 'T N Q @ coo � � � N � r'a � SFi • VJ 4-4 � 03 ° �, U >ct O c� -a o ct Cd ct > o � • � i W � � vl ,� z oCd >cl wm o >, aC,3cd :� >: y U o O R c 00 0 U� C7 o 0 Cl 'C ° o c C cz !, r.. a�i U a kn (A'2 .2 o r Zcz o W o In 3WD o :o w a sue. o O N C,3 It ycd �V �,�� o 0-0 Vl rA U OdU A�Nv�d d x . 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . rl 00 m CD Cb a. d V m a. - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 04 ajoA3 saiaewwnS AljGdOJd - UO-L :;uauay M Le ai ,e U U U N 'o od Rl I rm rm 124 u L9 U U U - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 06 aloA3 saiaewwnS Aj.IadOJd - UO-L :;uawLi Y 00 6 O � Y � p O o O o v a 00 v to u' c N � o d N ❑ O c U 0 (n _ > C N O 3 Q o QD un v ■ 0 3 o � o � " > w ON O O 000 ADD ,- I -i q -i -1 O c l 000 ADD � �n .. 7d yg a Con U 4--, > O n _Ocd cn ° 0 N ° cn cicn o cn A C) to. y f� cncd in. � P, .1 —u _ N en cd Qn o • • • • • • • • C� oO o W o O O y o� a� 3 o~U o anM uU � N O O U o°-' cq v o (~ tn O UQ.I N M O I� CIO 3-4 o �H o�� 0 N - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 06 aloA3 saiaewwnS Aj.IadOJd - UO-L :;uawLi I rm rm u 24 U cz U U ct U z. U U O O M U •� a O CIO 41. ;:s 0 o o � o'd to cd Q� 0 � O O O U N N 4: un w. a� N 'm N 0 bA c bA U Gn CA ct en O � � Qj O O N 03 w P3 .�: Cd Ncz:clN ^ c N it IU-I CIO u cd .y O O = En r.. cd N cd ;:s p t4 N O 4 a u Q� to O — tit U 3 O 0 C7 0 0 N r 0 PO Coo O N 15,1 N V rn 5 � bA ,O fir" cd ON w o �. en � o vs o = bAyHA- °8 � g .6 2 ' 4� �" �. to O ti a d m a I Le - aa};iu WOO i(aosinpd uoi;isinb3V pue-1 : L80EZ) Is!-l-El 04 ajoA3 saiaewwng A:Padoad - UO-L :;uawq c; �L Q% IOL J CL L V (D r_ CL 4D u C 0 L L N d 7 co m 4] co q� � L S6 C] � C r 7 W Q` Q1 a CL CL J 0 U.0 N O ti a d V m a - aa};iu WOO i(aosinpd uoi;isinb3V pue-1 : L80EZ) Is!-l-El 04 ajoA3 saiaewwng A:Padoad - UO-L :;uawq a� o w m E CD m O m b m Ji 2 4 J Q W N z �� v W z � a L a AEI U N O M a v =co o � U � Vd, S M. - aa};iu WOO i(aosinpd uoi;isinb3V pue-1 : L80EZ) Is!-l-El 04 ajoA3 saiaewwng A:Padoad - UO-L :;uawq Z v v a` Y t U V 2 O' � � v a) d J S - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 06 aloA3 saiaewwnS AjjgdOJd - UO-L :;uawLi M No U U U a W A w V c � C o o ' v 00 9 o�v A� 1 ` Ln m N m N OU � E m i ^ N a� m p 0 L o� w� 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m 0 to 1-ci aQ •.. N �y 4" o03 � a ��69 M .. �" 0 y C N V +�- m —CdN -C U cd U O � s p s, i yU sU. -O th O U 'C y Ncn U N O � O x ,� X C cC ccl c� C1. _O U c QO P� i 4 O c c� .0 v� L: N O yrn O n �. -- 14CI bA . cC 1.0 U -"'. sue. r. VI bA 0 p0. O O n� O 4° >� O N cn a ice. 'C '� cd v 4� cC c� N cd N � �+ O ' i. � , v v ,_, � O Q" „3 � e� °•• � C p � ,� v� 88 x0 O O C bA �D cn y yO t y 00 cZp �� cC34 t �U y U 4� C Lrn y O � -C O O U O 'CW13 4. lu Z i0i M •v �" C". " .. •" i] O �. N p O y tr (73 (~ �U". a U Co on4°,O a u a aEidUEi xa x x as U O aN�i . . . . . . . . . . . . . M - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 06 aloA3 saiaewwnS Aj.IadOJd - UO-L :;uawLi No ON O in,o � • � cd O . .� un ~ � y F- un Q O � N N ro �00� a: a U Cd C W V O N � � N � 3U•i '3 N N O O �bA 5 O z" cd,un M ' CA CA O O 00 •y � cd O � � � ~ cd ~ ul to`no b ° oCA o 000 .-0 O N O O U 4: un� a: 7a M 0 r = 0 un 0 •� N O U � In, N O x- N N C c�: o U U >,o� 0 0 a� U N � O O 7� ti aj N 4-1 r� OD o$151,'L ,,' •"O O+ � r.., blip �, � w O 't tit � y Z � Ln `tip •� ° � M Ua w O O O 0� 0 0 '� •ti GC N w e�C L It y O M N O'C •rQlzN' r-I N 0 ti tj O a.)C O "O O ti N O O 04 mo M o) i � Q O +, w � o, o o 20 4" O C4 N -14 t O cn O a" CU,3 � � b4 �' O 's" •� 4 4 w � v U 4 O Ct N N m U O s M WD o +' O 0 A o bO U > O p c,3 �' O4.1 N O bq N O O+ O y N cd O un cn cd a: C.)4- O O 0 4'. N y O m U C13 x M ,O C� N >ct ct3 U O O +--' N ct m cn 4.1 r 4. N O o � � N O 0 ci c N O '0 O ^- > N UD Ln •- X CA O V 0 ct Ct O oO an un O rA N O V CA U > � � � F- m COO 0 0 O OC U O � � O U N czs N U cd N O U ;" -. cd U •a a: ii rA w It U yC�3 U 4-4 cUj 0 V o O O 0 i. s: +�- , � Coo CL QM 4.5 5 3 Ix A a � � � ,� 2 0 0 ml M - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 06 aloA3 saiaewwnS AjjgdOJd - UO-L :;uawLi No cd 0 N P M ti O ti a d V m a - aa}}iu tUO3 tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L80£Z) Is!-1-8 06 aloA3 saiaewwnS AljadOJd - UO-L :;uauay N Q CD N �r C� MW o� U� = ' LM C C] W IL J J � J �L J � C L r j CV i p G7 N �a c� L CL co c a 0 = � J 0 L C � o CL LO L .� c 0 0 m `m 0 00 O ti Cb d r+ d Y V R d J W CDw N N Co N -1 N to N Ui N •P N W N N N -� N O 1 w 1 00 1 -1 m Ch a W N a i CD 'o Cb W N b z v n C) 3 v"'t rye CO ` l C d n Cp r b ,�, Ln P Q. rt Cn z O r�i� d fOb 4. v r: O y R CO � y rp 'J :. m ro rn Co Fr CA C C ffR y n ..r fR7 6 .R. O W .y iJ. O y .n+y� :Q O O e Cn H 7(A "L 'i? a) - GO C O tn• �" O ,^�S y R O C C7 mC y N• N V1 U1 Vr }�. •F- .6= '1 y v F-. r+ r+ ►+ Ut Vi Ut i-+ �1 00 00 �I O ,F tJ _ _ r �1 O C Vt 4-- W A 1-0 4"'+ J A 4o A O G1 W W IJ 00 .P A© a, -I A �] 1.] p O A ds. :1 ;s7 10% b9 'A ;n 6rf u) '-` �Q {,q N -I VI yy ff?- 69 69 b9 A b9 J 69 4� 6H A 114 Ul 69 w 6S W .0. O -I A VI 00 Q, r 69 .P 6n th 6A G1 CA 4P N G En Ut bH N 69 N 64 N r N u W 4+ W Fls W L6 to F!1 o c o c c "v c c o c o 0 0 0 0 o a c o c o c o o "V1 '(A o v c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o C5 o 0 0 trJ w � y )� r 6H FA VI) 6A Ln 0000 LAado tj 4n � FA Col)bg 6A cm9 m W A �A W W O N .P C 6A 64 65 6A N N N N 00 +A O ".w W Ct ON v7 dr J G" V' W r- �• .- O\ N a.. m m J+ C CG} O -I O ul C3 O �D is W o O tN � O r- 41 0 00 U1 �1 . + •.+ �I o 4� ui C+ V G 00 w W 00 O da J f� `d Aaaa � c ,C ct Q G C n C 9 G P+ — N w o N f rm lj 74 O �y o �n s rD o v R rc n= epw Ora 26.A.25 0 7 O 1 N M O O N Packet Pg. 769 -;� � .p 41 A W W W W Co W W W W 1 4 W Cri P W N O CO Co W Cn w W N TQ Co k HCD �° m c ro m 1 i" m H w 7 ti 4 n 7.a•C� N ro g _Z1Co P7 SU ' 9 G A (tea �? f, .`Z rL C k C] w Q �, �� ro �a Cl- L4 Q 7 y PrO W U7 k Q 4 f9 m o � .r W 4� C A O� 'JI 'I� •� n 0 rb P7 -a a w :d; 6n 1A 1� es USfb s ^, i.> Ut o i � o "- 0 'N c O Rio O ••• N o �3 a, i- C W CC-j C.ti J 4�n W f e CN s9 .P. ui ul ro • o 0 0 o c o in "v� vj c o o C- c 00 C O O O O O C y � f Eo� tl- FA be M m Ul G0 Vt G �t �1 4 V� 'JI C u4y1 p C A 00 ON � 00 O O O .A. P y M = o > 'r > 9 S' G CI- ' R n > � > LE > po — G a d CD a z ro CL n y A— � ucl o 26.A.25 0 73 to CD 4,I O 7 C? O 9D m N N O N Cl N 7 7 El Packet Pg. 710 � i y R° ro c d � � c. b `•� sn Ft o o a m rt Cn FC 7� o to`�eo � m o y o v C C CD rp CS m vs n. eD w eD ' H g in. n w 0 D py n M C 0 K 0 H r r K (�0 !� to la O H b y In H �' n•! l�9 v ro 17 i'ti H R. iv Ci O n N A f�9 VOi Qn •_.: 00 A� i-+ I--i Vl r �+ �-+ �..+ th Vl f1l i-+ J Oo 00 �1 O A N �+ N i-1 J O G Ul Vl W v A A tO J A 00 A A 1= O� W W N 00 A A O O% J A A J N O d A A A N iA N A sue+ � iA N w A A 6A bA bA 6A fA FA 6A �O V ON Fig 6A 1.6 f.A 6A EA r.A EA 6H 66 bo A A J A A Ul W W O +l Ul 0o r A Ul ON A P Un N N N N W W (A Ul ►+ � � Vl Vl C J Vl N 00 00 W Ul O W r A Ul r — I; 1 W A .A Ul N N A A JUl oo A 0 0 O O O O O Q o o C 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O d 4 O f!l O O. O d O d O P O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d O o G o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O G O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O d P o O O W N Gm EA (A GA 69 bA 6A 0000 Ul 0000 W FA 66 6A FA 69 UA .hj W W A A W W O N A O EA 6A 6s 6A N N N N 00 r+ G6 rC V K do �O A O �0 W Q, 01 �O ON \0 V 1 0% �o W r r �+ ON N A eo f9 A A O �-+ A W O -I O t!� 0 0 1.0 A W O O W A O "l 0. J J N J J W O 00 Ul J W+ F+ -4 O A Ul Ul Ot O O A A A Ul r A W O Cr)J W 01 Ut \0 O 00 W W 00 O A J i-} b i d7> Y 0 p O w ry ! O. b w v' g x by a CJ b? C7 �• 'pc3' O pEr 0 DID o 'Z• � a' F < N W ii C] GJ • N n O a ` C w co M. Ci CD n � m w C m q C . 5 `� w ov M o o tG m O p G p C_ N Packet Pg. 713 E d �5 26.A.25 N N 0 N M 0 U U) C 0 U 1 _ 71 L C > p ypj y R 0 q C W W Ob 4.7 p C .c � � � •� o p a o � E n •� � � R bU �.' Q �r+ i 're •-i _ -] uo Yam. Q Q U E CU �y�•y O > Q J 4 W LU 0- as a a 7 v Q b 00� m Q �n 0 Q a a R 0 o zy a o Q Q` u G4 ao o O o N n b w in 69 56 666 6n Gn 6n s 'Tr N Uq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0© o ao \o a o o a a a Vl W In o 17 *y o a a G vi iri ri � oo � o; o o vi vi o 0 6A 6A r oo o �D M o �n oo a\ ri �O P 1 r' r M 16 6A H9 69 69 64 N9 69 U4 +A a 11) o to 0 �o 0 V 0 o Tt o M a '4q C Cl M n CA o O M o0 ri 0 vi b V) C7 o o W a " 0 •�+ u a v e� z ram! y L vai •k Cd •k /Wy •O /�� i1 0 O = o a �ii�"!III 1=6p F5 ai o ='L oj 3 a x °�� d Ir W N u q i O 3 CA G17t % a J a A a a4 a u u N N O N M N 3 3 El Packet Pg. 714 � � n n' Od tv O � y '+ h i Z 0 O r i t W O N t i' N O O G O O n ¢ A M y �. io P C y e 7G a w W n r 7 M 0 0rA m CFl C. m CDO 4z k • n � o m ts J m y p1 m y ��„ -' C�7 Y CL [�7 v` roc `yr m' y z•q '� z CD' ci e U) Vi r > p� n o -� o1 z JEJ ram- N m 0 o (A t© w o 0 0 0 0 69 69 b4 69 60) 6+a gyp. , N N Gn O� Al fR 0 O O bi N N 69 .P !h 4 v A pb Ch O �7 O A 00 O\ -fto 0 rsa 69 s9 :+ cr9 Q J G !h tfl O J N O O O J GO O O O ao n ;�- ;;- a a � >. �cn > 0. O Y C EL= R n ^ o W l ti y O � c c c c c ...� a »s Q 0 K rp na' -oy w r N O N N Packet Pg. 715 l ti y O � c c c c c ...� a »s Q 0 K rp na' -oy w r N O N N Packet Pg. 715 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 3 7 El Packet Pg. 716 ru o ° rL ° UA t! R C 6 :7 F.s rt m Q. Do C v n r1 O Cr tv n 0 CL CrJ � `9 m �-• .-� .-• .+ O� �+ + d d p N W � J 00 lil G1 F.i H+ .- ..• Ch f!1 f!i � dm .P s9 vi :1 J A 00 da S� (h O fh CT (h W w J N OD 00 00 4a -1 A O C A 0, N J .P A J N O O A d- 1A En <� ' 4A on 4A " 14 N , �A y) �A y 4A 4o9 N) V/ (A N 6A bA 4 4� 1 L1 FA V) 4A EP. N 6A 6A 4A 6A A 41 W 4A Er 6A :0A A J A J 4A. Ul V, N W 00 W 00 C W J GA O W W h+ Z .P LA v1 4- d th N N N N Ct W N N Eh A Vl A DD 0 Vl O Lh '0 p 0 0 0 0 C O O , d O O C d C] C .1 d _�1 O d d 0 J� 0 c O O Ch V7 d 0 p 0 p 0 0 0 4 o 0 p O p O p 0 p 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O d C o O p O o C p O p O o O o O O O d O d p o O o O p O [�7 y 4A W 4A 39 GPI 609 v 3 EA b9 69 0000 CA 0o0 W 6A 6A GA vA 6A Q6 W W 4a .p W W O N A O bA 6A 6A I e N N_ N_ N 00 N 4A A rp 3 O V^ j4a O ��'] 1 C� V W -+ - da x, O 4� W Cs -A d VA 0 0 �D i= IN C O W A O �+ K Q. J J N J �] W W O o 00 %A --IW J .•+ •.• Jt J tiD p O .La CO 'J7 w r� W C1 ao © d d is A J � b y O U1 qo� o � a 0 r0 Co N " n CO G C, O O � 0 h7 Cn a tz, n n coo h C U4 � C N ry l I ep ° () VI CUQ o v o 0 26.A.25 O ZT W m w 0 C) O m' N N O N ai 3 Q o w ca N N N Packet Pg. 717 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 3 7 El Packet Pg. 718 0 � j in CD CD c y ~ to to so S CD x �j to b L" O O 'Md G rA a' n G o o roCD "� •d rno a ��qy rod} .d b :� vlT1i 4 `� C b DO Z G of bd foo1 m �A so p id r y C-4 o ep°' °*�� tea* r��• H `C ran• N � A� � i� � .�•� i� N p � � '�` m �. N � r�i� ��C1 rA Vt A A A in (A !h i -� -1 00 00 � o .� [•. A A 10 1 -4 A I oo A P I=ICPNIW W N loo A I A OI C% �1 1A 1 A� IN G o A A A w N iA 6A w 605 60 A -1 ON fA 6N Y3 fh b 9 H9 En A fA w A A fig rA 69 A A J A A ut W W O .3 (h 0o w p th O% A N W N N W W Ui Ch w (h (h O J (h N 00 00 W (h Q W w th - -4 J W A PL o0 Q Q Q p 0 0 O O C 0 0 0 4 o Q Q O d 0 0 0 p 0 O G (h (h O O Q Q O O O O o C O d O G O Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 p 6 O Q 6 O Q a Q Q c o 0 o Q e o 0 0 0 0 o Q Q o 0 0 0 o a o o a d Q V. C � W H9 6A 6A fA fA 6A W fh 0000 W b9 6) 6A W bA fig M m W W A A W W O N .P. O Le rin 6A 6A N N N N 00 Sn fC r0 W (T ON yo ON ro 1 ON %a W w r1 w tT N D. A w O +1 Q [h Q O �O A W Q Q W A C -9 m -4 -4 W O 00 (h -4 w w -4 O A lJt Sh Q+ Q O ~p C]+ A .b, Sft w A W O Ch -4 W o*� th �c d 00 W W go to \ t0 (S. o a C (D � w_ o• �? 'b p. O p G p p ti O M w g w o � o � w N tm A. o P rn w d O d ate' W) CD Yj \ o �d S N N O N M 3 3 i, Packet Pg. 719 0] z n� bta � n ro� bd b m v �d o a• �' o Cn � ►e � � � 't7 w O ',� R. raw 0fb ro 1 x -IV M a v gr C , �. yro H b a Ga w w C p a ro R! q 4CD on a0-4E o m CO Cl Cr o o rn 'i o oo O o� %0 e, is is O ON Ul in O IN 11 VI ro tJ N IO CDO 00 th 0- O N W +] m A O 0• 00 +I 69 E09 �O O rtJ1 th O O �O �O Q1 06 r 1 4J 1fi ytl� • O O O O O O © O O I•+ b UI W 411 O O O O O O CA �1 Do b O O O O O N 6A A 6i9 Yi EA V9 N (A O A O N p O rffAJ1 4�1 rrIA+ Q a�� a > v 10 n P. y � � is �, �• � � "'d �*• b �. � � taD' o w �• G C: thin '"3 a Cl p w a roEl G S p pyd Ixs �k3 w_ r_r y m �a ro '� Q C❑ tji y CC Cd `; �. E' a n 7y a �yy > �. p a o o C�1 Crl `� �•' .G m rL W. G� N Kn rt C� m w 0 0 CD N N O N M N 3 �I 3 El Co w N O Packet Pg. 720 26.A.25 0 a v s CD m m m d O C. r. y .. t7 RD ffD7 O O rD +n ro o 0 ryaCD C. CD y y '*art &D ��v� �o deb rineD .�...}} 3.xCD v1 w . � s w 3 CDf° G} w 'a y m Y o ti Co w �' t" -oe a �" ro m rw, Cn ro -3 m c•i C17 � N• r+ ..� r- ••• .+ C. ..� �• O O C N W � �] 0D U1 N CT N �+ i.+ r+ 'Jl U1 !i A .4 A w v 1D J Ot) •W 4a d 01 W W t4 W .P •A O tT -1 4F- 4�- J N O d A A �7 Ln 64 6A ~` b9 N�+�p, A O O 69 6q 9A 69 69 N 6n 69 A �o A J ;:PS69 69 In fn N 69 ld3 fag 69 69 69 64 is i� J da .0 Ut N W W O W J Ul O W W �•+ VI U1 tT 4w J O 1 th W N N is UK O. N N A .C. 00 /9 rb �h W a J V e 00 Oo ut •F � .P O O UI VI O CL O O p O P 0 O O O O C d 0 0 0 0 O O d 0 0 0 4 O O O O O 0 d 0 d 0 0 0 0 O 0 C7 O C O C^ p d p 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 p 0 0 0 p 0 Q O 0 O 0 p 0 p 0 P 0 O O O O P O O • H4 W 69 W 64 A 69 4- 69 W 69 W 0000 O Ul N 0000 A W P 69 69 69 69 6A tJ 69 N b9 N 69 N Vd 00 f 6) Z t�9~ tp y J .P J A N Vt J rt J A W W C7 O 00 O% UI J J W r tT r fit�d J O O is OO Ul W W W % t]0O O O .H �l nb o � 9 > > > > > > > >�� a c� Qom o C. ro � � g .i � � � C7 •� ✓ [o �' C7 y b� Uo U3 b m� D a � •< _. fR e m " � c � n 3 c R C EV fm a v uc _ 17t � �1J y C•� rt O 4n od o O Packet Pg. 721 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 3 7 El Packet Pg. 722 26.A.25 0 N . 2Y CDO• O O T ID �, i6 pCb 'p' � b rD S ' � '� Qt UJ to rn 'd C' ry m 4i p � "C CL y fD G 1•j .9 p S �f•9� 3 8 '7 o y, Z m o trJ � ro r. ^ CL M � z rD m t7 a n � o G < •� :3 1n y C V Itn 1 J !S < o 2 to C7 a' ro n r Z ro r ut 0 ro Cr7 ti .•F N N �_ � _� � �• N 00 O Li CS O W 00 *N -1 J b9 W W C C C O UI VI G O V O\ 00 �] W 11 J� O G O O C 'n.. 0 C th to �V7 O C? Q' O O C. ON O O O C O O O O O O O\ 00 O OCA O O O O N � � A EA 69 fA �.. SH CD IV rt CD N C d C C C A 8©0 C+ J 00 O O O n� a a 4 o Qft ao BCD V)> ro c 5 no n O 4 ip w C Pl 0. 7 N O Ln ii7 pt S C O {%j Ln M- c2° ac 3 o F El C c' 6 o hi trl o • O /r� \/ �l 7�R P > � n 0 n� .� QR •*,PO 00 C a Co W N N O N Cl N 7 El N O N N Packet Pg. 723 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 7 7 El Packet Pg. 724 26.A.25 0 CD m � o o � a+ ➢ '� �. 0 eb w .6 a- rn' rA t7 a c o ro N G� cr'o c Q b ['7 7J Np b ^ 5 b N A 7y "mod C� � O o G C" �' O. :0CD n y A p :7 0'9� a eD 17 CD � W O ai sCD Cr CD CL C C .S G• 'H t9 a. Ln 51 A� A �. '= 7G •� eb M co 0 CP N , .-. i-. r.. r r @� .-�• O O O N W 7111 �I GD U1 BN1 N r-+ r r �-lr U�`- - f�+ •� ' r-i th •-•.-+ '+ �•+ (A Vi N J 00 Oo �] Vt '_ r 4� O W W N w .P A O C� -j4� A -] N O CD i Q D c a o 6s EA C 5' <' N b 5A Fn TA({3 fA N V) 69 A U^ 4� --A69 69 FA 6A EnV3 4n � En A � F/3 EA 69 O y (D •� _ .P �l .P A 'Jr W W O �l ut 00 i. Vt CN A O LA N N N t.� W W Ch Vr r Vt Ut d 1 UI N 06 OD W VI O W i� 'Ji r +i : 1 W •P i� Uf N N A .F 00 C? :.: -� Vt C!r d d 0 0 O O O © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O d O O O O O p O 0 0 O O O CS 0 0 C O =Ic=l C 1= 1= O O d O O O O C - •a O � J FA 6A En 6A b9 6A DO CA 00 W EA 6A 6A 6A 69 6A W W A .P W W d N A 0 6A 6A 69 69 N N N N 07 69 r�-r 00 rA �4 A o �C W Oti G� V b - 7 CY 1-0W ••• t-+ •1 c� �'' M -] O 00 CA -1 A 6 V {D nED y as �a➢➢➢ o� ➢➢➢➢ ➢a➢➢ ➢➢➢➢ ➢ n ,q o o a.Cn `< dEp 6 O � CC iv � � • � Curl n � w % n rt 3 w ` n rno < ro p N" w c n ,a ry N a N pq�_ O w ro W q E ro v 00 V v y 0 9 v W o Q � d ➢ W Qa w o a' � a Go w N O N N Packet Pg. 725 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 7 7 El Packet Pg. 726 26.A.25 0 N o n� > n b� by ; �0 w W rtr n CD n T D a ro a Cb c S w' ro Ica m. a ru to .� C7ill `U m CD �' c v y G n 2' c o o � H o ° a o ro p R r p r ro p � � A Cu :tuW Q ¢ c fl _ .+ 4. J O '� O CA W W W N d W op C\ %Z. CT IZD CA -A d t= A7 f7 W O N W d O d O O O O O O @ W ko� �••..� m N p 00 O y O N W J T 4 O O 4J 00 91 J J 69 W 109 W y O O Vi �A O C V^ O� 00 J W Ji V, fD rt tp Vn ih o o a 0 0 o c a -i o0 0 0 o a e o C � �.. as {fj O {{i N ce.. M o �.Pd.LA N J 4 O O G Q 4il. 000 GJ'1 N O N N J OO C O b ryr O pl C1y Y Y A Y Y Y m 6on CD G. Uo• � � � a -� ry C b rt UO Y -a D °� o ff n' =' r' n y G n. • rjo C o O Irl m ti (9 'D ?. ry O T V/ C.rr Ma 1 T4 O Y n •� a ov y f9 W. o� W N O N N Packet Pg. 727 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 7 7 El Packet Pg. 728 26.A.25 0 z � a �, '� , • o a� Fp n CO r� b Cl CD CL n n n � 70 rp a ro rbI w o to -1 W Y Rm m ni, 4 ro a m a rni tJ o ``, ° m' -3ro ir CD ~'fit S'bn Y y R n � �: rD n N n n C d 0 a 0 d .0 o M •* ^ V] �, n � ro .+ �+ .+ �•• .• G1 ,••• O O O N W A -7 00 (h CNi N r+ �• LIB It A A W VA CA EA EA --a G0 00 -4 O 4, N N 00 A 4- O ON- -4 4= EA 6F3 EA C R fA fA .. b9 N Ji Ef3 C 9 W) EA 6A b9 En bA 6A N (A 6F A V" A -.1 CN EA to En EA N Ef3 EA to Efi — -&I A 69 bA v9 � y A A �1 da .P. Ui W W O �l Ul CO .r 4i Cis C1 4�- O Ut N N N N W W Ul ro vi 0 ?i 0 O 0 �] p Ut p N p OD p 00 C W C Ut O O C W G -+ ,p. O Vi O `.. O J O �l W O A O i+ C rJe O G N G N G A Ut .p. th 0o C CL C O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 C1 G G G O O G G O Q O O O O C O O O b9 I 649 6A EA IS 69 EA W Ul 0000 w 604 609 6A b9 EA b9 rn f�L W W .4a A W W O N A O FA fA FA N N N N 00 ty OY r1 �1 N J �1 W O 00 th J _C — -4 C i U1 C, O O A A A to A W C CT �] W C1 �J1 W O 00 W W 00 O J n� aaaa� a �a�y yaaa C6 ro C o x m d a a CFO, rjo w n u N - ry C 2 y G ro n N .7r N rt C `N-` w rCc h7 0� CD -u a a n- ro n n o a i CL n uq t.� O G W N O N N Packet Pg. 729 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 3 7 El Packet Pg. 730 N o fV2 � v •d o ? � o � `' � �' b 07 k rlp '•v .7 s "` ecs fD �1 rye fC .Y .%: !L '� © ; r7 0 N O 0 � � ru rCo W � �"`L ro o- CD o' o' a c- ^a CD b C tt 'z7 fD `p C s 0 O .� C z Q eD ry � n n n e m m v ro ti7 rrua L'] m e t9 v 73 ro Da x. vrotD Y iv O n q, rD o w m n ro y V, S, y rDro 4 0 " j p �/�• in _ kCD LQ z n o r� a _ r J J iJl W N W G1 T t p� o c0 O O� �O G� (++ .ta O �1:. 0� Vi (h W O N W O O d d O O O Q Q a z V w to V" 00 r�r O W GC Q =% � J J 69 W fA W C y O O VI ih O O V C� 00 --1 W JI JI ro fC o o a o o o s "vI in o o n 0 o d d a J oD o 0 0 0 o d Cy O is N :: � ro FA ifi i rD 00 A O �] �] C !l� th O rD Q•, O O O p N N J 00 nb y o rn n a > y a O 3 -v icy !2 -u b > C R _ _, G C = (a 0 m ro Cr CD a P. F �bn toga n o a � ro � m r!q © C 26.A.25 0 D in v 0 m n 0 t� N N O N M 3 _ Q 00 W N Q N N d E 0 U 0 N a 0 N u Q C R J ti O O M N Packet Pg. 731 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 3 7 El Packet Pg. 732 0 w � 2 o o R o b O C ti m a W Qo m n C ti roton b r CL m m ft ro .� y y Ch c C. n ro 0 �7 :? rD tv o rs rL CD U7 r! A C M1i-y O f'SD O � 'S G G `7 � O ,y "�. CJ O ,•r 'r {� � � y '.S ..l ry7 3 r `% .V'•' r ..E f0 f� f^ O ro y 'yt Ci ryr. p C G 0 cn' r-I O p tr .( '•! o ?� �90 G� .� � p {� C 17 y N fC � r r •+ d, >•+ r O O G N W A � 1 GO Cn N O� N ►+ w+ �+ Ve Vr t!� A i� ,A ems-, y � C11 r s+ VI VI C1 Ell W W �1 N GO O? 00 J A O O �f+ Oti N -44P + J O O VI fh P I EN A 69 6A fH rr 6A 69 ~' b9 1" 1 In Lori 6A 6A 69 6A 6A N 6A 6R 4� V 4> --Ib9 6A 6A 69 N b9 b9 69 b9 A ,L. 64 GA V) C y UI CI( O .P �3 A UI ',A N W 00 W O O W J (n (h O 00 W r r .P A. th UI C\ r •P J O J (A W N d N .L� N UI N N W N W N (h UI A -• ccro m C O 0 0 0 O 4 G O Q C O G O d O 0 0 0 0 0 0 �P 4 G ul O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 d O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O d O o G 0 O 0 G o O d Q o O 0 G 0 G o O d O o O d O d O d O d f 6A W 6A W 69 A 6A A 69 W 69 W 00 O (A N 00 4F- W d 6s b9 69 65 609 N yA N fi9 N bA N U9 00 6A i � �• �O ti0 •P Q �O W O\ O. rD u 1 01 W r — _ CN C -4 O (A 0 0 �O A W C C Li A O �' ••( Q �1 J N J J W O 00 W J r r J O A Vl Ul C\ 4-- •P fA r .Fi W o D1 J W ch s ti0 o 00 W W C* o �l nb y O 6n aaaaa u yyay ayaa aaaa a a n o b 0. 6J QO J A� vryi O p" Ep, 0. Q D D y E ra C G � 'O rc '��' " UQ fnCD m G Q 3 C9 O z m nbn ova a (, Qn o a y"°q W C C c Packet Pg. 733 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 3 7 El Packet Pg. 734 26.A.25 0 N b y k � Z ''� � ''� � � O ra .�7' C irof C � Q c�. rD •� ro In � rp o �' � a in r�o c• � c o n. � � '� � '� � G . 2- rip r�.I -4 ry L�7 � � y n b ti C Cli �- to A. vro •wi i M' ' � ' :zs _ z CQ y rL ro to z 4 0 Z3 Q rNL A O Q .-• J V Cl1 W _ N W C� � r/r � �' � OD d C �D Oti W �Fa d �. O� VI '✓k w a N w d C o o a o 0 o c 0 ' W b9 - fag N a < !" ., :- J 6,9 y C f0 N �D 00 4 O W O O 00 J b9 V'i C y N d d N J 4� O W Cl J W w r' m 2 0 0 0 o 0 vl 0 VI 0 o 0 o - 10 a o oo UI "vl w ih n JI C C? C Q J O C1 O C C O o �w O O O C Ch J 00 d d d d d cg � y � O boq N 69 FR T y bR 64 4� p N N J 00 0 0 0 n� r as n a a a a TQ o o � rrq I �. n rwo W e cu I—r rD p m m c� m o ra ° > m �' rrm 7a D � y � n o 0 a o n o v � ro ua o c a OD 1 w 1 N O N N Packet Pg. 735 26.A.25 N N O N M a+ N 3 7 El Packet Pg. 736