HEX Final Decision 2022-49HEX NO. 2022-49
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
October 13, 2022
PETITION.
Petition No. BDE-PL20220003152 -1521 Gordon River Ln - Request for a 2-foot boat dock
extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100
feet in width, to allow for the widening of the internal portion of an existing U-shaped dock
and the addition of a 60 square foot floating dock that will protrude a total of 22 feet into a
waterway that is 1224: feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06. The subject property is
located at 1521 Gordon River Lane and is further described as Lot 19, Nature Pointe, in
Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The petitioner is requesting to remedy a protrusion issue by means of the subject boat dock
extension; the modifications being proposed are to shave off interior portions of the U-shaped dock
to allow for the mooring of a wider vessel and to add a 5-foot by 12-foot floating dock to the north
side.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FTNDTNGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
I The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
Page 1 of 6
5. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative. There were no objections made at the public hearing.
6. The County's Land Development Section 5.03.06.H. lists the criteria for dock facility
extensions. The Hearing Examiner may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a boat dock
extension request if it is determined that at least four (4) of the five (5) primary criteria, and at
least four (4) of the six (6) secondary criteria have been met.'
Primary Criteria:
Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation
to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property.
Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are
the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be
appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-
family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island
docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The subject property is located within the residential development area of a
Planned Unit Development (PUD). Section 2.03.B.1 specifically calls out private boat
docks as a permitted accessory use to single-family dwellings; however, no development
criteria are provided therefore we default to the Land Development Code (LDC). LDC
Section 5.03.06H. La. indicates the typical number of slips for a single-family use should
be no more than two. The petitioner desires to construct a dock facility with a single slip
with a floating dock for recreational use.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or
moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish
that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s)
described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. At the 20 foot protrusion line when taken from the platted property line there
are just not sufficient water depths to accommodate the dock and average vessel beam
width of 10 feet. The dock has been brought into the shoreline as much as possible and the
outer walkway of the dock has been minimized down to less than 2 feet wide is smaller than
what is recommended for safe routine access to the vessel but that is what is existing.
Overall, there are insufficient water depths to moor a vessel or provide safe access to the
docking facility within the 20- foot protrusion mark for the average -sized vessels in today's
boat market.
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 6
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an
adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock facility will only protrude 22 feet from the platted
property line and 18 feet from the Mean High -Water Line (MHWL) into the subject
waterway that is approximately 122f feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire
waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact
thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility allows adequate space for navigation
as there will be no docks constructed along the opposite shore.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the
waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the
required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock facility will protrude 22 feet from the platted property
line and 18 feet from the MHWL into the subject waterway that is approximately 122± feet
wide from MHWL to MHWL thus the dock will occupy 14.75 percent of the waterway which
leaves 85.25 percent open for navigation.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would
not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The primary dockfacility has been in place since 2001, the only addition is
a 60-square foot floating dock to the north which has been located 15 feet from the
side/riparian line as required. Said dock will not extend any further south than it already
does and is 21 feet from the south side/riparian line.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed
dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these
may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,
or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The proposed dock facility was primarily governed by the County guidelines
and the approved PUD for the River Reach. The one special condition for the property
which is not unique is the fact that the property line is the most restrictive and therefore
there is approximately 4 feet of the dock that is not even over the water being landward of
Page 3 of 6
the MHWL. Additionally, with a rip -rap shoreline, the dock and associated boatlift/slip
must protrude further out into the waterway to avoid being located over rock. These factors
again are not unique for just this property but are part of the design criteria one must
consider when proposing a dock design.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not
directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dockfacility has been minimized in order to meet the County
dock building guidelines, the approved PUD, and be constructed within the 25% width of
the waterway. The proposed/existing dock design is consistent with the other existing dock
along the subject shoreline some of which have been approved for BDEs in the past.
Additionally, the design does provide adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while
still allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle access and
storage on the dock.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's
linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
NOT BEEN MET. The subject property has 80 feet of water/canal frontage, and the
proposed dock facility has been designed to moor a single 30 foot vessel which equates to
37.5 percent of said waterfrontage.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of
a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. There should be no greater impact to views than that which previously
existed as a result of the previously permitted dock facility which has been in place since
2001.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds
are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring
properties within 200 feet of the existing dock structure
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section
5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
Page 4 of 6
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion is
NOT APPLICABLE. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do
not apply to single-family dockfacilities exceptfor those within the seawalled basin of Port
of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands.
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06.H
of the Land Development Code to approve Petition. The Petition meets 5 out of 5 of the primary
criteria and 5 out of 6 secondary criteria, with one criterion being not applicable.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BDE-PL20220003152, filed by Jeff
Rogers, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. representing Florida 4 Figs, LLC, with respect to the
property described as 1521 Gordon River Lane, further described as Lot 19, Nature Pointe, in
Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida, for the following:
• A 2-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for
waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow for the widening of the internal portion
of a U-shaped boat docking facility protruding a total of 22 feet into a waterway that is
122± feet wide, for the benefit of the subject property.
Said changes are fully described in the Site and Dock Plans attached as Exhibit "A" and Boundary
Survey attached as Exhibit `B" and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Site and Dock Plans
Exhibit B — Boundary Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
1521 Gordon River Lane, further described as Lot 19, Nature Pointe, in Section 35, Township 49
South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
Page 5 of 6
2. The applicant must re -activate Building Permit No. PRBD20210626117 and obtain a
Certificate of Completion upon finishing construction.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT "A"
STATE OF FLORIDA
SUBJECT
MIAMI
CITY Mr-T VVCJ I ---
COLLIER COUNTY
SITE ADDRESS:
<> 1521 GORDON RIVER LN <> LATITUDE: N 21
NAPLES, FL 34104 <> LONGITUDE: W -E
NOTES:
<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPI
AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION I.
4•-�}ti � r
y' �- i�f� - r�
VICINITY MAP
COIIU'N-rT- AERIAL
DESIGNED JR
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 1521 G O R D O N R I V E R L N DRAWN BY, ;
Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO.' 22070 14.
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO.: 01 OF 07 15
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RYN0.5871 SECTION-35 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-25E
122' MHW TO MHW
RIPARIAN
LINE
XISTING
RIPRAP
�1 [�TIA�•. lii� I
N
■
OX E
S i
o 30 6o
SC?{CE9N�EE�f
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
SITE ADDRESS:
1521 GORDON RIVER LN
NAPLES, FL 34104 `
MHWL _'0001>
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
• ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: -COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC.-
SURVEY DATED: 04.2141
• • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 80'
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 384
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APP)O: 122'
• TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAVDO ♦0.4V
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED: R
'1521 GORDON RIVER LN �EATED 0�&�
Marine &Environmental Consulting -
EXISTING CONDITIONS JOBNO.:
02 OF _
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO. 020E 07 15
Email: tima(wthanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RYNO. 58775 SECTION-35 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-25E
EXISTING
DOCK
4
RIPARIAN
r !
112.6' I
ao I
TI MHWL
N
-L I
I
W-
�tl d
�� E
� aw S
0 8 r6 32
SCAa 9N 17=
oon��oTv
NOTES:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
• ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: 'COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, MC. -
SURVEY DATED: 04.2141
• « APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 1.
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 384
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 12Z
• TIDAL DATUM:
« MHW (NAVD)= +O.M'
MLW (NAVD)= -1.G3'
• « PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)384
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF) 384
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE. 1.
DESIGNED JR
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 1521 GORDON RIVER L N DY RRAWNBRW
Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO 22070 4
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SHEET NO 03OF07 11
Email: tuna[a.thanaples.com Phone: ;239) 643-0166 Fax:(239)643-0632 RYNO.w.15 SECTION-35 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-25E
22' PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE
18' PROTRUSION FROM MHWL
„s �
MHW +0.44' (NAVD '88)_
MLW -1 63' (NAVD '88)
0 2 4 8
S'CFiCE 9N�E�7
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING BOAT LIFT
EXISTING DOCK
EXISTING RIPRAP
DESIGNED JR 11
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. 1521 GORDON RIVER L N CRWo" M162 12
Marine & Environmental Consulting
Jos No. 22070 14
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 CROSS SECTION SHEET NO Da OF 07 15
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone:(239)643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RYNO. s87s law SECTION-35 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-25E
110, ---,
NO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGI WITHIN 200 FT OF THE IN
1t)L PROPOSED PROJECTS
H 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I Mw
30 60
a
TRANSECT SC71cE9N�EE?
g
s
m
p I I I I I I I I I I I I—T-
�
g I ( PROPERTY
m BOUNDARY
� I
o (I 1 I ( I I I ( I (
w N `
p
m
c ;0 I
< I
MHWL
—
I
y
1 I I I I ( I I I I I -
i
t TYPICAL DIVE TRMSECT
DESIGNED: JR
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 1521 GORDON RIVER L N AWN BY R �u ;: _
Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO 22070 4
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY SHEET NO 05OF07 s
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RY NO. S87S SECTION- 35 TOWNSHIP- 49 S RANGE- 25 E
N
g
■
21' S
o foo 200 400
SC.'4CE?N�EE7
25'-=
30' —
27'! I
31' I 1
1'—
I
27' I
21' I
25'--
I I
24,
W II
PROPOSED DOCK
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
NOTE:
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.
DESIGNED JR I I
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. 1521 GORDON RIVER L N EATEo* W 62;
Marine & Environmental Consulting
ADJACENT DOCKS JOB NO 06OF
,� •� 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO oc of 07 15
Email: tuna@thanaplescom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax:(239)643-6632 RrNo.se75 SECTION-35 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-25E
N
S
a � 36o0
r � � I
SCAa 9N'FFE7
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
122' MHW TO MHW --I
22'
SITE ADDRESS:
1521 GORDON RIVER LN
() I NAPLES, FL 34104
OHWL
— — AL —
o4 it 6 "'�
DESIGNED JR
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 1521 G O R D O N R I V E R L N EATED: ,MI&22
Marine & Environmental Consulting
roe No.: 7070
s
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 WIDTH OF WATERWAY SHEET NO.: 07OF07 5
Email: tun a[§thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RV No.5575 SECTION-35 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-25E
EXHIBIT "B"
SHOWN DIMENSIONS TO THE DOCK AREE
TAKEN FROM THE PROPERTY LINE (MOST RESTRICTIVE)
NOTE: IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES NOT
SHOWN ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY.
BOUNDARY INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY CLIENT.
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH I BEARING
L1 22.78 I 800'532M
L2 16A0 I S47'13VM
L3 1 30.59 1 887'W'49�IV
SCALE 1 • = 30 CURVE TABLE
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS TA AtiGI.E 4�C1
38.12 5000 13'40 212'
RIPARIAN LINE BOTTOM LOT 18
OF RIPRAP
TOP
�F RIPRM �9•��5•E
122'MNW I' w
M KWLINE To MHw - a
(AS SHOT ON
1 175 WIDE
I DRAINAGE CANAL EASEMENT
(O.R.121, PAGE 165)
GORDON RIVER
1 175 —
FLOATING
DOCK
22.0' I
I
I
WOOD DOCK/\ /
& METAL LIFT
— I
TRACT •C"
D.E.
RIPARUN 11N
I I I
).4'
1 0
88B'16.0(P)
498'E
I I I
11822' (►Q
I
KIWI I
I• 1pw RmEMENT8
NOT SHOWN)
1,1E
Igl$P
I
LOT 19
I I M Hw LINE
I (AS SHOT ON
I I amrm l)
10' U.E AND
SIDEWALK EASEMENT
EASEMENT
I t PLATTED
10 U.E
BOUNDARY LINE
EASEMENT Ir
N891063M
pOoq
100-W (P)
2S D.E.
N8 11frw
B0.B8'LOT
m)
20
P
I
I
I
i
Z w
Wr—yV
CDC)3�.5
Z
M IMVAN°N0
x I
ppoq Z
J v
FDDH
p WALK
paD.I
NOTES:
1.THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED
ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OUTRIGGER LANE
AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 20 PAGE 21
OF COLLIER COUNTY BEING NCRTH ODD S7 23' EAST
2.IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN
ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY
).SAID DESCRIBED LAND IS SUBJECT TO ALL SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS. ZONING AND
RIGHTS,OF• WAY OF RECORD
(DATE OF FIELD SURVEY APRIL 21. 2021
s.THI3 SUm/EY MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE
AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR
AND MAPPER ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS
OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR
PARTIES WRITTEN
IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT CONSENT
OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES
&SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE
NOT EXAMINED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO STATEMENT
IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND
OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS. UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT
MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY.
7 CLEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON NAVD. DATUM OF IM.
DESCRIPTION OF BENCHMARK IS AS FOLLOWS FPKND11M
IN CONC WALK BETWEEN RESTS 1e75 & 1651 GORDON RIVER LN
& THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE EXWNG AND
PROPOSED DOCK STRUCTURES WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROPERTY PROPERTY LINES ARE SHOWN AS PLAT
B.SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE' ' AS
INDICATED ON PENA FLOOD ZONE MAP PANEL NO
DATED BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED AT WA
10-40 TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
HAS BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPLIED
BY THE CLIENT IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE DEEDS.
EASEMENTS. OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS (RECORDED OR
UNRECORDED) WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE
SURVEYOR
11 TIME LAND DESCTUPTION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON THE
INSTRUMENT OF RECORD
REPOSITIONED PROPOSED DOCK
DATE OF REVISION 06-22-2021
REPOSITIONED PROPOSED DOCK
DATE OF REVISION 08.16-2021
REDESIGNED PROPOSED DOCKIFLOAT
DATE OF REVISION 12-21-2021
ASBUILT SURVEY (FINAL DOCK LOCATIONS)
DATE OF REVISION 03-01-2022
LEGEND
O • FOUND 0 IRON ROD ( SURVEYOR D 0) (FIR)
Q • SET Ifr IRON ROD (PSM &&ODIXSIRC)
7 • SET 4' X 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM 15004XSCMI
O • FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR D &XFCM)
40•BENCHMARK(FOUNDORSETI RAN• RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.WJ
Q • FOUND NAIL OR PK MAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR ID 9) (FPKN)
*-SET PK NALAND DISC (PSM SM)(SPKN&D) FD.•FOUND
FN&TT • FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB SM • BENCHMARK
(PC.P.I.�PERMANENTT CO CALCULATED
OL POINT(9) CCENTERLINE MEASUREMENT
PAM. • PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (5) (PO) • PAGE
(P) OR (D) • PLAT OR RECORDED(DEED) MEASUREMENT
(PO) • PLAT BOOK PL EXT • PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED
CARP- CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CATV•CABLE TV
•FINISHED FLOOR U.T.S- UNITED TELEPHONE RISER
• WELL CONC • CONCRETE CB • CATCH BASIN OR INLET
• WATERIGATE VALVE R.0 P. • REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
S•SANITARYSEWER PROP•PROPERTY X•SPOTELEVATION
• TOP OF BANK TOS • TOP OF SLOPE EOW • EDGE OF WATER
SOS • BOTTOM OF BARK SOS • BOTTOM OF SLOPE EO • EDGE OF
CBS•CONCRETE BLOCK & STUCCO VG • VALLEY GUTTER
ELEC • ELECTRIC TRANS • TRANSFORMER JAC • JACUZZJ
DE. DRAINAGE EASEMENT SWE•SIDEWALK EASEMENT
LBE • LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT IE • BRRIG. EASEMENT
PUE • PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT UE • UTLITY EASEMEN-
LMN(E)• LAKE IA TENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT
LME • LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT A.E.• A�.i ESS EASEMENT
MAP OF
BOUNDARY SURVEY
(PROPOSED DOCK SITE PLAN)
LOT 19
OF
NATURE POINTE
AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 20 PAGE(S) 20-22
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
1521 GORDON RIVER LANE
1521 OUTRIGGER LANE (BY PLAT)
CERTIFY TO:
COLLIER SEAWALL & DOCK LLC
CERTIFICATION:
I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. PURSUANT TO SECTION
472.027. FLORIDA STATUTES.
NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE. ZONING. EASEMENTSOR
FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES
SIGN=r
COURT H. GREGORY PSM #6004
DATE 0310212022
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 04-21-2021
LB #7112
PSM # 6004
CC.G.S.
Court Gregory Surveying, Inc.
761 Teton Court
Naples, Flonda 34104
(239)643-7845 office Date 03/022022
cgs6004@wmcast.nel Job 0EN10219A
(239)272.3707 Cell Fb EN1.6 Pg 80