HEX Final Decision 2022-48HEX NO. 2022-48
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
October 13, 2022
PETTTInN
Petition No. VA-PL20220001686 -1411 North Alhambra Cir - Request for a 3.2-foot variance
from the 10-foot accessory structure rear yard setback required by Section 4.02.03.1) of the
Collier County Land Development Code to allow an attached swimming pool screen
enclosure to be constructed 6.8 feet from the northern property line of an existing single-
family dwelling, located within a Residential Single-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district, at
1411 N. Alhambra Circle, also described as a portion of Lot 9, Block 6, First Addition to
Naples Twin Lakes, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The applicant requests to replace a screen pool enclosure in the same footprint as it previously
existed before being destroyed by Hurricane Irma.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(2) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
5. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative. There were no objections at the public hearing.
Page 1 of 5
6. The County's Land Development Section 9.04.03 lists the criteria for variances. The Hearing
Examiner having the same authority as the Board of Zoning Appeals may grant, deny or modify
any request for a variance from the regulations or restrictions of the Collier County Land
Development Code.'
1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location,
size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the subject
property is of an a -typical shape and was initially developed prior to ownership of the
property by the existing owner/applicant. The front property line forms an arc; the
measured setbacks involving arcs differ over the years, presently the front measurement is
taken from a chord drawn between the front corners of the property.
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the
applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of
the Variance request?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the residence was
constructed in accord with Building Permit No. 840002368, issued on 0911211984 for
which a Certificate of Occupancy was issued on 0111111985. A pool was subsequently
permitted as an accessory structure and yet another permit, No. 910004415 was issued for
a screen pool cage, issued on 0413011991 and for which a Certificate of Occupancy was
issued on 0612711991; the corresponding approved site plan depicts the cage as being 15
feet from the northern property line. The current property owner/applicant purchased the
property on May 23, 2012, and was able to provide a copy of a Survey dated 04119112 that
depicts the screen enclosure having been 6.7 feet from the north property line. The
approved site plans for the listed permits appear to be consistent and therefore neither staff
nor the applicant can explain the inconsistency pertaining to the rear yard. As the prior
pool cage was destroyed by hurricane Irma and has since been completely removed this
variance request is for a new pool cage and not the replacement of a potentially legal
nonconforming structure.
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and
undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the issue at hand
was not known to the applicant when he purchased the residence, and he wants to make
use of an otherwise perfectly good pool. After considering his options and finances it is not
financially feasible for him to relocate the pool to incorporate the screen enclosure that is
necessary to protect me from biting insects that could have a negative consequence given
the applicant's weakened immune system. The financial argument and issues related to
health are valid concerns.
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 5
4. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health,
safety, and welfare?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the applicant is
only requesting the minimum variance to make the most reasonable use of the small section
of property. Due to his chronic liver and kidney disease, the screen will provide much
needed reduction of the traffic dust from Goodlette Road, reduction of insect bites and to
keep the disease -ridden vermin at bay. Although the applicant has a fence with a locked
gate around the entire back property, the enclosure would be an added level of security,
for the health, safety, and welfare for all including wildlife. All other setbacks are
maintained, and sufficient deck area is maintained for safe use of the pool; additionally,
the use of a screen pool enclosure will reduce the potential for disease spread by
mosquitoes and other insects.
S. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by
these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that by definition, a
Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site.
LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through the Variance process for any dimensional
development standard. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be
entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case -
by -case basis
6. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land
Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that replacing the pool
enclosure in the same footprint that it existed in twenty plus years before the applicant's
purchase in 2012, the variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the zoning
code. The applicant also believes the enclosure will not be injurious to his neighborhood
nor any of his neighbors. It is not detrimental to public welfare. In fact, it is an extra layer
of security and aesthetics for all, considering the rear yard of the subject property abuts
green space and parking for a multiple family housing project.
7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and
objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that there is a 6-foot
wood privacy fence along the western property enclosing the entire rear yard of the subject
property.
8. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP?
Page 3 of 5
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that approval of this
Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP with respect to density,
intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions.
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 9.04.03 of
the Land Development Code to approve Petition.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition No. VA-PL20220001686, filed by Kenneth
G. Kelly, Jr., with respect to the property described as 1411 North Alhambra Circle, also described
as a portion of Lot 9, Block 6, First Addition to Naples Twin Lakes, in Section 15, Township 49
South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, for the following:
• A 3.2-foot variance from the 10- foot accessory structure rear yard setback required by
Section 4.02.03.D of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), to allow an
attached swimming pool screen enclosure to be constructed 6.8 feet from the northern
property line of an existing single-family dwelling located within the Residential Multi-
Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district.
Said changes are fully described in the Boundary Survey attached as Exhibit "A" and are subject
to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Boundary Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
1411 North Alhambra Circle, also described as a portion of Lot 9, Block 6, First Addition to Naples
Twin Lakes, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. The applicant must satisfy permitting requirements for the issuance of Building Permit
Application No. PRBD20171146585 and obtain a Certificate of Completion once built.
Page 4 of 5
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT "A"
SURVEY SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY
FOR REPLACING POOL CAGE
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN NAVD DATUM, WERE ACOUIRED USING
GPS TECHNOLOGY AND HAVE A TOLERANCE OF ♦/— 0.4'
IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN SHOWN
WERE NOT LOCATED
NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR DESIGN
I YII N ALn AMCRA I,IK
NAPLES, FLORIDA
CERTIFIED TO :
KENNETH G. KELLY JR
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 9. BLOCK 6, FIRST ADDITION TO NAPLES TWIN LAKE, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGES 52 AND 53, PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION
OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 6:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 6;
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 6,
S49'47'13"WEST 205.12 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF EAST ALHAMBRA CIRCLE; THENCE ALONG THE
NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF EAST ALHAMBRA CIRCLE
8.44 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHWEST, RADIUS 85.00 FEET, CHORD BEARING NORTH 47'50'39"
WEST 8.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH 50'77'50" EAST 198.9E FEET TO THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 6, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 6, NORTH 89'46'38" EAST 10.00 FEET TO
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 6 AND THE PLACE
OF BEGINNING.
FIR 5/B'
NO IC I PLAT BOUNDARY
1 6' WI•
o
0
�
Z
LOT 8
BLOCK 6
FIR 5 _ NIOR 150/8' I DRIVE
NO I0/8 RIGHT OF WAY PC )
serma•W. TI.Ye• M (3
75.00' (P)
WEST
30.'
0
CENTERLINE 1 `
NORTH ALHAMBRA CIRCLE
(60' ROW)
P.O. B.
N.89'46'38"E. 216.76' (P) FIR 5/8' NE CORNER
N.8910Y4'E. 206.75 (M) 6 9 LOT 9
NO ID
WF
axe' g• WIF /
I POOL cl N REMAINDERLOT 9
�1 �Q1 /
BLOCK 6 06.5 `�,` /y
ca1,c o 09 / Joy
01411
�� •AAry �9 /
R�Es>ar �tEJ O��h
A g / \�
30.0'
THE LINES ON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTITUTE OWNERSHIP,
COPYRIGHT 2022 F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP.
PAGE 1 OF 3
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR PAGE 3 OF 3
N
M _ E
SCALE 1" a 40'
/ V Curve number 1
'�1P• ��/ / (
---
-----------
Radius- NA Da=45'00'00"
Are- 66.76
n35.21 -v2K
9� CTangrd=t=
65.06
LOT 10 Chord Brg. N.67'3000"W. (D)
/ BLOCK 8
/ Curve number 2
--------------
/ Radius= 85.00
Delta- 05'41'21" .4• w
ID Arc- 8.44
QUALITY CONTROL
BY : MEF DATE : 06/29/2022
NOTE: IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER
ON OR OFF LINES (APPROX. LOCATION ONLY)
NOT VAUD WITHOUT SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL
NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES.
FLORIDA STATUTE 5J-17.05 (3) (c): TWO SITE BENCHMARKS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING,
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION.
3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104
F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP.
NAPLES, FL 34104
NOTE'
IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS & MAPPERS —LB 6569
239-404-7129 239-250-5730
239-250-2795 239-370-1900
5J-17.052 (2) (d) (4) (IF LOCATION of
EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD.
239-370-1139
OTHER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PUT, IS
9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE 200
REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE
DRAWN BY: SVJ PARTY CHIEF: I SOSA
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
Tangent= 4.22
Chord- 8.44
Chord Brg. N.47'50'39"W. (D)
Curve number 3
Radius= 85.00
Delta- 39'18'39"
Arc- 58.32
Tangent= 30.36
Chord- 57.18
Chord Brg. N.70'20'39"W. (D)
N.7114'37'W. 57.2W (M)
MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON
STATE PLANE COORDINATES (FLORIDA EAST
ZONE) AS ACQUIRED BY USING GPS
TECHNOLOGY AND IS THE "BASIS OF
BEARINGS". MEASUREMENTS LABELED AS
(G) ARE THE CALCULATED GPS PLAT
BEARINGS.
CERTIFICATION :
I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS SURVEY VAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSBLE
CHARGE AND MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY
THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS
CHAPTER 5J1705-052, FLORIDA ADMINSTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 472027 FLORIDA STATUTES. ORAPFOC SCALE
REVISIONS
BY : __ __ SURVEY DATE : 06/28/2022
CLINTON W. nNSTXD. PE, CFN. PIS #2453 LELAND F DySARD. PIS #3859 PROJECT NO:
MARY E. FINSTAD, CFM, PSM #5901
22-85789—SPC
SURVEYSKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY PAGE 2 OF 3
NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR DESIGN
PHOTO PAGE
3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104
F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS & MAPPERS- LB 6569 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600
9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE 200
BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 PROJECT NO.
DRAWN BY: LfD PARTY CHIEF: IN4A 1 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 22-85789
PAGE 3 OF 3
83. (R) = RADIAL
84. R = RADIUS
NOT VALID WITHOUT
85. RING = ITEM DETECTED BY METAL DETECTOR BUT
PAGES
1 AND 2 OF 3
NOT RECOVERED
86. RNG= RANGE
GENERAL
NOTES
87. ROW=RIGHT-OF-WAY
ABSTRACT NOT REVIEWED
88. RR SPK = RAILROAD SPIKE
89. SAT= SATELLITE DISH
N = NORTH
90. SEC = SECTION
S = SOUTH
91. SPK&D = SET PK WITH DISC WITH LB NUMBER
92. SIR = SET 5/8" IRON ROD WITH LB NUMBER
E = EAST
93. TBM = TEMPORARY BENCHMARK
W = WEST, OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF
94. TECO= TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY
1.
° = DEGREES
95. TEL = TELEPHONE FACILITIES
2.
` = MINUTES WHEN USED IN A BEARING
96. TOB = TOP OF BANK
3.
"= SECONDS WHEN USED IN A BEARING
97. TP = TRANSMITTER PAD
4.
` = FEET WHEN USED IN A DISTANCE
98. TUE = TECHNOLOGY UTILITY EASEMENT
5.
"= INCHES WHEN USED IN A DISTANCE
99. TVR= TELEVISION RISER
6.
± _ "MORE OR LESS" OR "PLUS OR MINUS"
100. TWP= TOWNSHIP
7.
A = ARC DISTANCE
101. UE = UTILITY EASEMENT
8.
AC = ACRES
102. VF = VINYL FENCE
9.
A/C = AIR CONDITIONING PAD
103. W = WATER SERVICE
10.
AE = ACCESS EASEMENT
104. WB = WATER BOX
11.
B.E. = BUFFER EASEMENT
105. WF= WOOD FENCE
12.
BM = BENCHMARK
106. WPP= WOOD POWER POLE
13.
BOB = BASIS OF BEARING
107. WREC= WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ELECTRIC
14.
BRG = BEARING
COMPANY
15.
C# = CURVE NUMBER
108. A = DELTA OR CENTRAL ANGLE OF CURVE
16.
C = CALCULATED
109. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND IN DECIMALS
17.
CB = CATCH BASIN
THEREOF
18.
CHB = CHORD BEARING
110. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE NAVD 1988
19.
CHD = CHORD
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED
20.
CLF = CHAINLINK FENCE
111. ALL PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHOUT
21.
CM = CONCRETE MONUMENT
DIMENSIONS ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES
22.
CO = CLEAN OUT
ONLY. THAT THEY DO EXIST, BUT WERE NOT
23.
CONC = CONCRETE
NECESSARILY MEASURED IN THE FIELD.
24.
CP = CONCRETE PAD
112. NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY CLIENT
25.
CSW = CONCRETE SIDEWALK
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
26.
CTV= CABLE TV RISER
113. EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS SHOWN ARE PER
27.
CUE= COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY
RECORDED PLAT OR AS FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT
EASEMENT
114. FOUNDATION LINE BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE
28.
D = DEED
GROUND IS NOT REFLECTED
29.
DE= DRAINAGE EASEMENT
115. THIS SURVEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR
30.
DH = DRILL HOLE
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNDER ANY CONDITION
31.
DI = DROP INLET
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED
32.
ELEC= ELECTRIC
116. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR
33.
EOP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT
IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS
34.
FOR = EDGE OF ROAD
NOTED
35.
EOW = EDGE OF WATER
117. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING
36.
F= AS LABELED OR FOUND IN THE FIELD
EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND/OR OWNERSHIP
37.
F.A.C. = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN
38.
FCC = FOUND CROSS CUT
118. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS EXCEPT
39.
FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
THOSE AS DELINEATED ON THIS PLAT OF SURVEY
40.
FEMA = FEDERAL EMERGENCY
119. TIES ARE TO FIELD LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE
MANAGEMENT AGENCY
NOTED
41.
FDH = FOUND DRILL HOLE
120. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND/OR
42.
FFE = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
EASEMENTS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON SAID
43.
FH = FIRE HYDRANT
PLAT THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC
44.
FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE
RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY
45.
FIR = FOUND IRON ROD
121. FENCES MEANDER ON AND OFF LINE,
46.
FN = FOUND NAIL
APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY UNLESS STATED
47.
FND = FOUND
OTHERWISE.
48.
FPK = FOUND PK NAIL
122. THE LINES ON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTITUTE
49.
FPK&D = FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC
OWNERSHIP
50.
GTE = TELEPHONE RISER
123. THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY IS FOR TITLE
51.
ILLEG. = ILLEGIBLE LB OR PSM NUMBER
TRANSFER ONLY UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
52.
LB = LICENSED BUSINESS
124. FLORIDA STATUTE : TWO SITE BENCHMARKS ARE
53.
LBE = LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT
REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
54.
LME = LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
125. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT OR DETERMINE
55.
LP = LIGHT POLE
OWNERSHIP.
56.
M = MEASURED
126. 121. F.E.M.A. FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING: THIS DATE
57.
ME = MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
PRODUCT WAS NOT DESIGNED TO MAKE PRECISE IN/OUT
58.
MH = MANHOLE
FLOOD RISK DETERMINATIONS. THIS PRODUCT IS NOT
59.
NAVD 1988 = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL
SUITABLE FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS AND CANNOT
DATUM OF 1988
BE USED TO DETERMINE ABSOLUTE DELINEATIONS OF
60.
NGVD 1929 = NATIONAL GEODETIC
FLOOD BOUNDARIES. CALL 1-877-FEMAMAP OR EMAIL A
VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
MAP SPECIALIST AT:
61.
NO ID = NO IDENTIFYING MARKINGS
HTTP://WWW.FEMA.GOV/PLAN/PREVENT/FHM/TSD EMAP.SHT
62.
(NR) = NON -RADIAL
PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD ZONE
63.
NTS= NOT TO SCALE
DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING, PLANNING
64.
OHP= OVERHEAD POWER
AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY
65.
OHU = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION
66.
O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
127. IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 5J-17.052(2)(D)(4) - IF
67.
P = PLAT
LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
68.
PC = POINT OF CURVATURE
RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT, IS
69.
PCC = POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE
REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE
70.
PCP = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT
FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
71.
PG = PAGE
128. IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER ON OR
72.
PI = POINT OF INTERSECTION
OFF LINES (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY)
73.
PK&D = PARKER KALON NAIL AND DISC
129. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, SUCH AS FURRING
74.
PLS = PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
STRIPS, SIDING, CORNICES, STUCCO, ETC., OUTSIDE
75.
POB = POINT OF BEGINNING
THE LINE OF THE STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN TAKEN
76.
POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
INTO ACCOUNT WHEN GIVING TIES FROM THE
77.
PP = POWER POLE
STRUCTURE TO THE LOT LINES.
78.
PRC = POINT OF REVERSE CURVE
130. ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT THIS
79.
PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE
MONUMENT
SURVEY MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED OR ENLARGED IN
80.
PSM= PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND
SIZE DUE TO REPRODUCTION. THIS SHOULD BE TAKEN
MAPPER
INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN OBTAINING SCALED
81.
PU & DE = PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE
DATA.
EASEMENT
82.
PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT