Loading...
Agenda 10/25/2022 Item #17D (Ordinance - To have BCC review the staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the CCPC render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and affordable housing agreement)10/25/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex-parte disclosure to be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District known as Waterford Estates PUD to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the project to be known as Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD, to allow construction of up to 216 multi-family dwelling units with an affordable housing agreement on property located at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Whitaker Road in Sections 9 and 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 21.57± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance Number 91-31, the Waterford Estates Planned Unit Development; and by providing an effective date. [PL20210003155] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review the staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above-referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and affordable housing agreement, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Whitaker Road in Sections 9 and 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and consists of ±21.57 acres. The petitioner is requesting that the Board consider an application to rezone four, currently vacant parcels - one zoned Rural Agricultural (A) and three zoned Waterford Estates PUD - to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the project to be known as the S anta Barbara - Whitaker RPUD, to allow construction of up to 216 residential multi-family dwelling units with an affordable housing agreement (See Attachment 3). The overall density of the project will be approximately ten (10) dwelling units per acre. The property is under the sole ownership of Greystar Development East, LLC. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Rezone (PUDZ) in and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build-out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUDZ and the subject petition can be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL20210003155 on September 15, 2022, and by a unanimous vote of 7 to 0 recommended forwarding the petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. The approval includes an Affordabl e Housing Agreement (Attachment 3) and Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) approval. The recommended approval also includes approval of one deviation from LDC §3.05.07.A.5 to allow preserve areas between parcels to not be interconnected and to be located in areas consistent with the Master Plan. There was no opposition to this 17.D Packet Pg. 1894 10/25/2022 petition. As such, this petition will be placed on Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: As to the rezone: This is a site-specific rezone from one Rural Agricultural parcel and three PUD parcels to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezoning is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for RPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions which will assist you in making a determination of approval or denial. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justifie d as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and future land use map, and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment 17.D Packet Pg. 1895 10/25/2022 necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies , letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney’s Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. As to the affordable housing agreement: The Agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form and legality, and it requires a majority vote for Board approval. If the rezone does not have enough votes for Board approval, the agreement will be withdrawn. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and Affordable Housing Agreement and recommends that the Board approve the appl icant’s request to 17.D Packet Pg. 1896 10/25/2022 rezone to the RPUD zoning district and approve the Affordable Housing Agreement. Prepared by: Eric Ortman, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (PDF) 2. Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (PDF) 3. Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (PDF) 4. [Linked] Attachment 4 Application and Backup Materials (PDF) 5. Attachment 5 Sign Postings (PDF) 6. Attachment 6 Legal Ad (PDF) 17.D Packet Pg. 1897 10/25/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.D Doc ID: 23436 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District known as Waterford Estates PUD to a Res idential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the project to be known as Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD, to allow construction of up to 216 multi-family dwelling units with an affordable housing agreement on property located at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Whitaker Road in Sections 9 and 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 21.57± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance Number 91-31 , the Waterford Estates Planned Unit Development; and by providing an effective date. [PL20210003155] Meeting Date: 10/25/2022 Prepared by: Title: Principal Planner – Zoning Name: Eric Ortman 09/20/2022 2:10 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/20/2022 2:10 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 09/22/2022 2:31 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 09/22/2022 4:56 PM Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Growth Management Department Completed 09/27/2022 4:34 PM Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation Skipped 09/22/2022 5:16 PM Growth Management Department James C French Growth Management Completed 10/11/2022 12:27 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 10/17/2022 8:32 AM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 10/17/2022 8:40 AM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 10/17/2022 10:31 AM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 10/17/2022 4:24 PM County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 10/19/2022 2:54 PM Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 10/25/2022 9:00 AM 17.D Packet Pg. 1898 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20210003155; SANTA BARBARA – WHITAKER RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENTS: Owner: Applicant: SB Terra, LLC Greystar Development East, LLC 1333 3rd Ave. S., Suite 505 788 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 201 Naples, FL 34102 Fort Lauderdale, FL. 33301 Agent: Paula McMichael, AICP Hole Montes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone four, currently vacant parcels – one zoned Agricultural and three zoned PUD – to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to be known as the Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD. The RPUD will have a maximum of 216 multi-family residential dwelling units including 43 units (20% of total) of affordable housing at 50%-80% of AMI (>50 to ≤80). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The ±21.57-acre subject property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately 1.2 miles south of Davis Boulevard, and roughly bisected, east to west, by Whitaker Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Page 2 contains a site location map; page 3 contains the most recent proposed master plan. 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1899 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 2 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1900 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 3 Master Plan – Exhibit C from Submittal 4 . 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1901 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 4 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The RPUD rezone will convert four undeveloped parcels which are shown in the graphic to the right. Parcel #1, bifurcated by Whitaker Rd., is zoned Agricultural. Parcels #2, #3, and #4 are part of the Waterford Estates PUD which was never developed. The water retention pond shown immediately south of the subject property is also part of Waterford Estates though not included in this petition. Permitted uses for the new PUD will include multi-family dwelling units and any other use which is comparable in nature as determined by the Hearing Examiner (HEX) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). Accessory uses will include uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted use as well as temporary construction and administrative offices during the development phase. The applicant is seeking a maximum of 216 multi-family residential dwelling units which equates to approximately 10 dwelling units per acre (DU/ac) which is below the maximum potential entitlement of 230 units. (See page six – GMP Consistency – for a brief description of how the density was determined.) Intentionally Blank 2 1 3 Subject Property 1 4 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1902 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 5 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Agricultural (A) - Single-Family Residential; Conditional Use (CU) for church (HEX 19-05) South: Agricultural (A) - Single-Family Residential, Onyx PUD East: Agricultural (A) - Single-Family Residential West: Estates (E), Residential Multi-Family (RMF-6), Youth Haven PUD Collier County Zoning Map 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1903 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 6 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject ±21.57-acre site is designated Urban Mixed- Use, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM); and is zoned Agricultural (A) and PUD. The purpose of the subdistrict is to “provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated”. The FLUE Density Rating System permits a base density of 4 DU/Ac in the Urban Residential Subdistrict (86 units); 4.6 acres are in a residential density band entitling an additional 14 units. In addition, the applicant is requesting an affordable housing density bonus of 6 DU/ac by restricting 20 percent (20%) of the units to residents making greater than 50 percent (50%) but no more than 80 percent (80%) of the Area Median Income (AMI). If the maximum affordable housing density bonus of 6 DU/ac is awarded this would permit 230 dwelling units to be built which is 14 more units than the developer is seeking (86.3 +13.8+129.4 =229.51). The requested density is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s January 14, 2022 Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 113 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segment of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following roadway links: 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1904 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 7 Link/Roadway Link 2021 AUIR LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Trips 2021 Remaining Capacity 79.0/Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard to Whitaker Road/project B 890/South 42/NB 1,948 79.0/Santa Barbara Boulevard Whitaker Road/project to Rattlesnake Hammock Road B 890/South 57/SB 1,948 Based on the TIS and the 2021 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 15.94 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 3.99 acres (25%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. GMP Conclusion: With the affordable housing agreement, the Planned Unit Development Rezone petition may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to a RPUD shall include a Master Site Plan for development; a list of permitted and accessory uses; development standards; any requested deviations along with justifications; and developer commitments. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (commonly referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The Planning Commission uses these criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The required preserve is 3.99 acres (25% of 15.94 acres), the master concept plan provides for 7.03 acres of preservation. The Master Concept plan illustrates four separate areas of preservation. No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicate the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1905 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 8 PPL or SDP review. A Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumpos floridana) survey confirmed no tree cavities were occupied by the bonneted bat; additional observations will be needed prior to approval of an SDP, PPL or Early Work Authorization. Additionally, Butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis), Northern needle-leaf (Tillandsia balbisiana), and Stiff-leafed wild-pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), listed as less rare plants, have been observed on the property and will be protected in accordance with LDC 3.04.03. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-ways. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. The developer has committed to providing an 8” minimum diameter water main along the south side of Whitaker Road, between Sunset Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard for future water distribution system connections. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Landscape Review: Staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the LDC and recommends approval of this project. The buffer types labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the Land Development Code. Stormwater Review: Stormwater staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Zoning Services Review: This petition includes four contiguous parcels which comprise ±21.57 acres. One (#00420400002) is currently zoned Agricultural (A); the other three (#00409400007, #00419720007, and #00422200006) are part of the Waterford Estates PUD, Ordinance No. 91-31. Ordinance 91-31 has not been amended. All four parcels remain undeveloped. The proposed RPUD rezone seeks to permit a maximum of up to 216 multi-family dwelling units which equates to a density of roughly 10 DU/ac. The land contained in this petition is designated Urban Mixed-Use, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Per the Density Rating System, the Urban Residential Subdistrict permits a base density of 4 DU/ac. Through an affordable housing agreement with Collier County, the applicant has received a density bonus of 6 DU/ac. The agreement will restrict 20 percent (20%) of the units to residents making greater than 50 percent (50%) but no more than 80 percent (80%) of the Area Median Income (AMI) and will yield 43 units of affordable housing. The requested density is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property is adjacent to two local roads – Sunset Boulevard and Whitaker Road. Along these two roads, the multi-family dwelling units will have 85-foot front yard setbacks to mitigate visual impact on people living along these two roads. This setback is noticeably greater than front yard setbacks of surrounding properties. At 25-feet, the front yard setback along Santa Barbara is in line with adjacent properties. In the location of one multi-family building, the applicant has been 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1906 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 9 granted a reduction to 20 feet which allows the petitioner to not have to make multiple adjustments to the layout of other buildings in the project. A 20-foot Type D landscape buffer will be at the external boundary of the PUD on its easter and western borders which will further reduce the project’s visual impact. The property abuts a water retention pond at its southern border; the landscape buffer here has been reduced to 10 feet. The northern 300 feet of the subject property will remain in preserve with no additional buffer needed. Any visual intrusion of the maximum 45-foot high, three-story buildings (maximum actual height not to exceed 52 feet) on the neighboring properties will be offset by the large 85-foot front yard setbacks on Whitaker and Sunset and the 20-foot Type D buffers. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the Planning Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. A water main is available along Sunset Boulevard and wastewater mains are available along Sunset Boulevard and Whitaker Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. The development’s stormwater will outfall into the Santa Barbara Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road area LASIP Stormwater Management System. Stormwater management details will be evaluated at the time of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) and County Site Development Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Future Land Use Designation of the subject property is Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The purpose of the subdistrict is to “provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The proposed RPUD will result in a multi-family development with a higher density than the current density in the surrounding area but below the maximum potential density 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1907 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 10 permitted by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The proposed petition will develop land that is currently vacant in an area that is mostly surrounded by residential development thereby, in keeping with FLUE Policy 5.5, not contributing to urban sprawl. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report. The petition may only be found consistent with the GMP if the GMPA companion item is approved and is in effect. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The northern 300 feet of the subject property will remain as preserve; the subject borders a stormwater retention pond on its southern border. The residential development project is compatible with the land uses of the surrounding area which is largely residential. A large portion of the western boundary of the project along Santa Barbara will remain in preserve. Areas along the western boundary (Santa Barbara) have front yard setbacks in keeping with those of neighboring properties. Principal uses on the eastern boundary (Sunset) have large, 85-foot front yard setbacks providing visual relief for residents along Sunset. The external boundary of the project has a 20-foot Type D buffer except along its southern border where the buffer is reduced to 10 feet as the property abuts a stormwater retention pond. The surrounding area is largely residential. While the majority is at a lower density, the density sought by the petitioner is consistent with that allowed by the FLUE. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least 60% of the gross area for usable open space (LDC 4.07.02.G.1). No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance will be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. A water main is available along Sunset Boulevard and wastewater mains are available along 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1908 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 11 Sunset Boulevard and Whitaker Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. A water main is available along Sunset Boulevard and wastewater mains are available along Sunset Boulevard and Whitaker Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. One deviation is proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. See the deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 16. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08.E shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings when applicable”. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The Planned Unit Development Rezone petition may only be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan if the companion GMPA is approved and is in effect. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed petition is surrounded by residential development and is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1909 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 12 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning map on page two of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries and coincide with the GMP subdistrict boundaries. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. Current market conditions make residential multi-family development economically viable for a developer. The existing permitted uses on the subject property do not allow for multi- family dwellings. The proposed rezone, while not required, is necessary to construct a multi-family residential development. The requested action is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD is consistent with the GMP and meets the requirements of the Land Development Code. Large front yard setbacks along Whitaker and Sunset will minimize the visual impact of homes along these two roads. A landscape buffer encircles the entire PUD. The northern border of the project will have a 300-foot buffer (preserve); on the southern border the PUD abuts a water retention area, and a 10-foot buffer is being used. Along Sunset and Santa Barbara (east and west borders), there will be a 20-foot Type D buffer and/or preserves significantly deeper than 20 feet. As Collier County continues to grow development is spreading eastward. The area surrounding the project area is transitioning from agriculturally zoned land to residential single- and multi-family and PUDs with densities ranging from 3DU/ac to 10 DU/ac. As proposed the project will not negatively impact living conditions in the neighborhood. ‘ 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP is consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUDZ request is not anticipated to create stormwater management problems in the area; provided an environmental resource permit that addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1910 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 13 management of importing stormwater flows, on-site stormwater treatment, and attenuation storage is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Principal structures in the proposed PUD have a maximum zoned height of 45 feet, not to exceed three stories. The maximum zoned height in all zones surrounding the subject property is 35 feet. For this project, the front setbacks for principal structures are 85 feet on Sunset Blvd. and Whitaker Rd. and 25 feet along Santa Barbara. These setbacks help to offset the higher building height so that light will not be seriously reduced for the surrounding properties. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Location is a major component of house valuations. Currently, the Naples area is highly desirable as a place to live. The dwelling units will be built to current development standards creating an attractive overall development. Property values are affected by many factors which may be external to the subject property. There is a subjective factor in determining property values which may include external factors to the subject property. Given these factors, it seems a reasonable conclusion that the project will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed project is confined to the specific parcels of land and is compatible with the GMP and should not impact the development of adjacent properties. Roughly half of the adjacent properties are undeveloped; the other half is comprised of PUDs or single-family homes on agriculturally zoned lands. The basic premise underlying the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan which is the guiding land use document for the County. Implementation of the Growth Management Plan is in the publics’ interest. The proposed development standards are comparable with the development standards for surrounding properties. The project will provide 43 units of affordable housing. In return for this provision, the developer is being granted an increase in the density of the overall project. This “affordable housing density bonus” is available 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1911 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 14 to all developments. Given these factors, the proposed development does not grant any special privilege to the project that is not available for any similar projects. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The property could be developed in accordance with the current zoning. However, there are legitimate reasons for developing the property as proposed. The County needs more moderately priced housing compared with the average value of homes. This project will provide that as well as 43 units of affordable housing. The proposed project represents a higher and better use of the land that is consistent with its Urban Residential Subdistrict designation and is further supported by the presence of sufficient public facilities 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. Assuming adoption of the companion GMPA, the project will be consistent with the GMP and therefore be in the publics’ interest. While on the upper end of the range of densities in the surrounding area, the project will help to fulfill a Countywide need for more moderately priced housing. It is staff’s opinion the proposed uses, development standards, and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There are other adequate sites within the County that currently would permit the proposed project without the need for rezoning. The developer has selected this site as it is consistent with the GMP; has sufficient public facilities; is close to other zoning districts that permit multi-family housing; represents a higher and better use of the land than what it is currently zoned for and is economically viable. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. All the land contained in this petition is undeveloped. Any development that occurs after the adoption of the newly formed PUD will require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services is consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1912 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 15 Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) will be minimized. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board of County Commissioners during the advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one deviation requesting relief from LDC §3.05.07.A.5. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1 (Preservation interconnectivity). Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5, which establishes the preservation site location criteria, “Preservation area shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors.” The applicant is requesting a deviation to allow the preserve areas between parcels to not be interconnected and located in areas consistent with the Master Site Plan. Petitioner’s Justification: The minimum required native preservation is 3.99 (25% of 15.94 acres of existing native vegetation). There are four preserve areas proposed, as shown in the Master Concept Plan. The northern preserve area is 4.56 acres and consists of 1.08 acres of Melaleuca and 3.48 acres of Pine/ Oak/Cypress. Although the portion of the preserve containing Melaleuca does not contribute to the project's required native vegetation for the purposes of this application, that area will be cleared and restored during site development. Once restored, the northern preserve area acreage will exceed what is required. There are three other non-contiguous preserve acres totaling 2.43 acres: one north of Whitaker; and two south of Whitaker. The preserve areas will be enhanced through the removal of exotic vegetation, and, where needed, supplemental plantings will be installed to provide additional cover by native vegetation. These areas preserve existing wetlands, provide additional buffering and screening of Santa Barbara Blvd., and provide a more aesthetically pleasing view for the proposed units. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Environmental staff recommends the APPROVAL of the deviation request. The preservation areas proposed, looking at the Master Concept Plan from north to south, are separated by a dedicated drainage easement (O.R. BOOK 5109 PAGE 3087), Whitaker Road, and a proposed stormwater lake. ES Staff is in support of protecting wetlands where possible to increase the preservation of critical habitat, which also stores and improves water quality. The selected preservation areas are sensitive wetlands that are isolated and do not interconnect, which prevents the required interconnectivity for the preserved areas required by LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5.; therefore, ES Staff supports the deviation request to allow the preservation areas to not be contiguous. Per LDC Section 3.05.07.F.3.f.ii, the Wetland Preservation Areas will be required to have a 25-foot vegetative buffer. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM at 5:30 p.m. on April 6, 202 at the New Hope Ministries church located at 7675 Davis Boulevard in Naples. The meeting was attended by eight residents and ended at approximately 5:50 p.m. 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1913 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 16 Bob Mulhere introduced the project which is entitled to 230 units based on the base density allowance of four units per acre, 14 units resulting from 4.6 acres being in a residential density band, and 129 units of affordable housing based on 20 percent (20%) of the units at 50-80 percent of the Average Median Income (AMI) which is approximately $85,000. The project is asking for 216 units or 10 units per acre. The traffic analysis shows that 113 p.m. peak-hour trips will be generated by the project. There will be site improvements on Santa Barbara to facilitate getting in and out of the development, but they haven’t gotten that far in the process yet. Hopes to get to Planning Commission during the summer and the BCC in the fall. Ana Penrajo, representing the applicant, Greystar Development East, noted that Greystar is a privately held company and is the largest apartment owner/operator in the United States. Greystar has a captive general contractor who works only for Greystar. All their projects have a clubhouse and multiple amenities. She showed several projects that they have completed in southwest Florida and a three-story concept architectural rendering of the Santa-Barbara Whitaker project. There were only two questions asked. The first asked why there wasn’t any signage posted for the meeting. Bod stated, as required, letters were sent out to people within 500 feet of the project and a newspaper ad was run. Signs will be posted for both the Planning Commission and BCC. Ms. Penrajo answered the second question by stating that Greystar sometimes retained ownership of the project and sometimes sold the project. No commitments were discussed at this NIM meeting. A copy of the NIM materials is included in Attachment 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is requesting a deviation to allow the preservation areas to not be contiguous as required by LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on April 22, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition PUDZ-PL20210003155 subject to the affordable housing agreement. Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance (081222) 2. Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement 3. Application and Backup Materials 4. Advertising and Signage 17.D.1 Packet Pg. 1914 Attachment: Attachment 1 CCPC Staff Report (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1915 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1916 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1917 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1918 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1919 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1920 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1921 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1922 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1923 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1924 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.2 Packet Pg. 1925 Attachment: Attachment 2 Proposed Ordinance - 091922 (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 1 of 30 This space for recording AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AND IMPOSING COVENANTS AND RESTRI CTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the. day of, by and between Greystar Development East, LLC (the "Developer'') and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (the "Commission"), collectively, the "Parties". RECITALS; A. The Developer owns a tract of real property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein (The "Property''). It is the Developer's intent to construct a maximum of 216 residential units (the "Units") at a density of 10 units per gross acre on the Property. The gross acreage of Property is 21.57 acres. The number of affordable Units constructed by Developer shall be 43, representing 20% percent Of the total number of residential Units approved in the development. B. In order to construct the Units, the Developer must obtain a density bonus from the Commission for the Property as provided for as Land Development Code (LDC) § 2.06.00 et seq., which density bonus can only be granted by the Commission and utilized by the Developer in accordance with the strict limitations and applicability of said provisions. C. The Commission is willing to grant a density bonus to the Developer authorizing the construction of 130 bonus Units on the Property, if the Developer agrees to 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1926 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 2 of 30 construct affordable housing Units as specified in this Agreement and in accordance with LDC Section 2.06.00 et seq. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the approval and grant of the density bonus of 6 units per acre requested by the Developer and the benefits conferred thereby on the P roperty, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby ackn owledged, the Developer and the Commission hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Developer Agreements. The Developer hereby agrees to provide following affordable housing units in accordance with this Agreement and as specified in Exhibits A through G attached hereto and incorporated herein: a. Forty-three (43) of the 216 units will be provided for those earning ow between 50 and 80 percent of Collier County’s area median income (AMI). b. All affordable units will be rentals. c. The units will include multi-family units with a variety of bedroom types. d. No affordable housing unit in the development shall be rented to a tenant whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this division as a low- or very-low-income household. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager or designee for approval. Tenant incom e verification and certification shall be repeated annually to assure continued eligibility. If, upon annual recertification, a household’s income is determined to exceed 80% and below 120% of the applicable Area Median Income limit for Collier County the unit shall be determined to be in compliance with this agreement so long as the following conditions exist for the applicable unit and household: Household’s with income certified 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1927 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 3 of 30 between 80% and 90% of AMI will be charged the rent at the current 80% rent level; households earning between 90% and 100% will be charged 90% rents; households; households earning between 100% and 110% will be charged 100% rents; and households earning between 110% and 120% shall be charged 110% rents. If household income of any tenant occupying an affordable unit exceeds 120% of AMI, that unit will no longer qualify as an affordable unit and the developer shall offer the next vacant designated market rate unit to a qualified household to meet the minimum of forty-three (43) affordable units. e. Any rent charged for an affordable housing units rented to a low-income household will not exceed the amount published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation for Collier County adjusted by income level, family size, and number of bedrooms, and updated annually. f. The following provisions shall be applicable to the affordable Units: (1) Defined terms: For purposes of this Agreement, "Phasing" shall mean: (a) the phased construction of buildings or structures in separate and distinct stages as shown on a PUD master plan, subdivision master plan or site development plan; or (b) in developments where phased construction is not depicted on a PUD master plan, subdivision master plan or site development plan, the construction of buildings or structures in a clearly defined series of starts and finishes that are separate and distinct within the development. (2) Median Income. For the purposes of this Agreement, the median income of the area as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shall be the then current median income for the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size as shown on the tables attached hereto as Exhibit C , which Exhibit shall be adjusted from time to time in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event that HUD ceases to publish an established median income as aforesaid, 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1928 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 4 of 30 the Parties hereto shall mutually agree to another reasonable and comparable method of computing adjustments in median income. (3) Eligibility and Qualification of Renter. Family income eligibility is a three-step process: 1) submittal of an application by a prospective Renter; 2) verification of family housing unit provided under the affordable housing density bonus program prior to being qualified at the appropriate level of income (very low, low, moderate or gap income) in accordance with this Section; 3) certification of eligible Owner by the Community and Human Services Division. The Developer shall be responsible for qualifying Renters by accepting applications, verifying income and obtaining income certification for all affordable units in the subject development. All applications, forms and other documentation required by this Agreement shall be provided to Community and Human Services Division. Qualification by the Developer of any persons as an eligible Renter family shall be subject to review and approval in accordance with the monitoring and enforcement program in LDC§§ 2.06.05 and 2.06.06, respectively. (a) Application. A potential renter shall apply to the developer, owner, manager, or agent to qualify as a lowincome family for the purpose of renting and occupying an affordable housing unit pursuant to the affordable housing density bonus program. The Preliminary Application for affordable housing unit shall be provided to Collier County Community and Human Services Division as shown in Exhibit D, attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference herein. (b) Income Verification and Certification. No affordable housing unit in the development shall be rented whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this Agreement and LDC§ 2.06.05. (c) Income Verification. The Developer shall obtain written verification from the potential occupant (including the entire household) to verify all regular sources of income 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1929 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 5 of 30 (including the entire household). The most recent year's federal income tax return for the potential occupants (including the entire household) may be used for the purpose of income verification, attached to the affordable housing applicant Income Verification form, including a statement to release information, occupant verification of the return, and a signature block with the date of application. The verification shall be valid for up to one hundred eighty (180) days prior to occupancy. Upon expiration of the 180-day period, the information may be verbally updated from the original sources for an additional 30 days, provided it has been documented by the person preparing the original verification. After this time, a new verification form must be completed. The affordable housing Applicant Income Verification form shall be provided to the Community and Human Services Division as shown in Exhibit E, attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference herein. (d) Income Certification. Upon receipt of the Preliminary Application for an affordable housing unit and Applicant Income Verification form, the Developer shall require that an income certificat ion form be executed by the potential occupant (including the entire household) prior to occupancy of the affordable housing unit by the occupant. Income certification shall assure that the potential occupant has an appropriate household income which qualifies the potential occupant as eligible to occupy an affordable housing unit under the affordable housing density bonus program. The Affordable Housing Applicant Income Certification form shall be provided by the Community and Human Services Division as shown in Exhibit F , is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference herein. 3.Random Inspections. Random inspection of files containing required documentation to verify occupancy in accordance with this Agreement and LDC§ 2.06.00, may be conducted by the Community and Human Services Division upon reasonable notice. 4. Annual Progress and Monitoring Report. The Developer shall provide the Community and Human Services Division an annual progress and monitoring report 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1930 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 6 of 30 regarding the delivery of affordable housing units throughout the period of their construction and occupancy. The annual progress and monitoring report shall, at a minimum, provide any information reasonably required to ensure compliance with LDC § 2.06.00, or subsequent amendments thereto. The report shall be filed on or before September 30 of each year and the report shall be submitted by the Developer to the Community and Human Services Division. Failure to complete and submit the monitoring report to the Community and Human Services Division within sixty (60) days from the due date shall result in a penalty of up to fifty dollars ($50.00) per day unless a written extension not to exceed thirty (30) days is requested prior to expiration of the sixty (60) day submission deadline. No more than one such extension may be granted in a single year. 5. Occupancy Restrictions. No affordable unit in any building or structure on the Property shall be occupied by the Developer, any person related to or affiliated with the Developer, or by a resident manager. 6. Density Bonus. The Commission hereby acknowledges that the Developer has met all required conditions to qualify for a density bonus, in addition to the base residential density of 4 units per acre, and is therefore granted a density bonus of 6 density bonus units per acre, for a total density (total = density bonus units per acre X gross acreage) of 10 units/ac, pursuant to LDC § 2.06.00 The Commission further agrees that the Developer may construct thereon·, in the aggregate a maximum number of 216 units on the Property provided the Developer is able to secure building permit(s) from Collier County. 7. Commission Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, the Commission acting through the Community and Human Services Division or its successor(s) covenants and agrees to prepare and make available to the Developer any general information that it possesses regarding income limitations and restrictions which are applicable to the affordable Unit. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1931 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 7 of 30 8. Violations and Enforcement. It shall be a violation of this Agreement and LDC § 2.06.00 to sell or occupy, or attempt to sell or occupy, an affordable housing unit provided under the affordable housing density bonus program except as specifically permitted by the terms of this Agreement; or to knowingly give false or misleading information with respect to any information required or requested by the Community and Human Services Division or by any other persons pursuant to the authority which is delegated to them by LDC § 2.06.00. Collier County or its designee shall have full power to enforce the terms of this Agreement. The method of enforcement for a breach or violation of this Agreement shall be at the option of the Commission by criminal enforcement pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.69, Florida Statutes, or by civil enforcement as allowed by law. 9. Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the Developer fails to maintain the affordable units in accordance with this Agreement or LDC § 2.06.00, as amended, at the option of the Commission, building permits or certificates of occupancy, as applicable, may be withheld for any future planned or otherwise approved unit located or to be located upon the Property until the entire project is in full compliance with this Agreement and with LDC§ 2.06.00, as amended. 10. Assignment by Commission. The Commission may assign all or part of its obligations under this Agreement to any other public agency having jurisdiction over the Property provided that it gives the Developer thirty (30) days advance written notice thereof. The Developer may not assign, delegate or otherwise transfer all or part of its duties, obligations, or promises under this Agreement to any successor in interest to the Property without the express written consent of the Commission, which consent may be withheld for any reason whatsoever. Any attempt to assign the duties, obligations, or promises under this Agreement to any successor in interest to the Property without the express written consent of the Commission as required by this Section shall be void ab initio. 11. Severability. If any section, phrase, sentence or portion of this Agreement is 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1932 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 8 of 30 for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and all other provisions shall remain effective and binding on the Parties. 12. Notice. Any notices desired or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall either be personally delivered or shall be sent by mail, postage prepaid, to the Parties at the following addresses: To the Commission: Collier County Community and Human Services 3339 E Tamiami Trail Building H, Suite 211 Naples, Florida 34112 To the Developer: Greystar Development East, LLC 788 E. Las Olas Blvd., Ste. 201 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 With copy to: Richard Yovanovich, Esq. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 Any Party may change the address to which notices are to be sent by notifying the other Party of such new address in the manner set forth above. 13. Authority to Monitor. The Parties hereto acknowledge that the CollierCounty Community and Human Services Division or its designee, shall have the authority to monitor and enforce the Developer's obligations hereunder. 14. Indemnify. The Developer hereby agrees to protect, defend,_ indemnify and hold Collier County and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all claims, penalties, damages, losses and expenses, professional fees, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments arising out of any claim, willful misconduct or negligent act, error or omission, or liability of any kind made by Developer, its agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1933 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 9 of 30 15. Covenants. The Developer agrees that all of its obligations hereunder shall constitute covenants, restrictions, and conditions which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the Property and against every person then having any ownership interest at any time and from time to time until this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Section 13 below. However, the Parties agree that if Developer transfers or conveys the Property to another person or entity, Developer shall have no further obli gation hereunder and any person seeking to enforce the terms hereof shall look solely to Developer's successor in interest for the performance of said obligations. 16. Recording. This Agreement shall be recorded at County's expense in the official records of Collier County, Florida. 17. Entire Agreement. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties hereto and shall inure to and be binding upon their respective heirs, successors, and assigns. 18. Termination. Each affordable housing unit shall be restricted to remain and be maintained as the required affordable housing as provided in the LDC §2.06.04. 19. Modification. This Agreement shall be modified or amended only by the written agreement of both Parties. 20. Discrimination. (a) The Developer agrees that neither it nor its agents shall discriminate against any owner/renters or potential owner/renters because of said owners/renters race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or handicap. (b) When the Developer advertises, sells or maintains the affordable housing unit, it must advertise sell, and maintain the same in a non-discriminatory manner and shall make available any relevant information to any person who is interested in purchasing such affordable housing unit. (c) The Developer agrees to be responsible for payment of any real estate commissions and fees for which it is liable in the purchase and sale of affordable units. (d) The affordable housing units shall be intermixed with, and not segregated from, the market rate dwelling units in the development. The square footage, construction and design of the 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1934 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 10 of 30 affordable, and gap housing units shall be the same as market rate dwelling units in the development. All physical amenities in the dwelling units, as described in item number seven (7) of the Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus, Exhibit G , shall be the same for market rate units and affordable units. For developments where construction takes place in more than one phase, all physical amenities as described in item number seven (7) of the Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus, Exhibit G , shall be the same in both the market rate units and the affordable units in each phase. Units in a subsequent phase may contain different amenities than units in a previous phase so long as the amenities for market rate units and affordable units are the same within each phase and provided that in no event may a market rate unit or affordable unit in any phase contain physical amenities less than those described in the Developer Application. 21. Phasing. The percentage of affordable housing units to which the Developer has committed for the total development shall be maintained in each phase and shall be constructed as part of each phase of the development on the Property. Developer commits to 20 percent affordable housing units for this project, with 20% percent of the units in each phase consisting of affordable units. 22. Disclosure. The developer shall not disclose to persons, other than the potential buyer, renter, or lender of the particular affordable housing unit or units, which units in the development are designated as affordable housing units. 23. Consistency. This Agreement and authorized development shall be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and land development regulations of Collier County that are in effect at the time of development. Subsequently adopted laws and policies shall apply to this Agreement and to the development to the extent that they are not in conflict with the number, type of affordable housing units and the amount of affordable housing density bonus approved for the development. 24. Affordable Housing Density Bonus Development Agreement. This Agreement is a distinct and separate agreement from "development agreements" as defined by Section 163.3220, Fla. Stat., as amended. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1935 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO 25. Preapplication. Developer has executed and submitted to the Development Services Department the Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit G and incorporated by reference herein. 26. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 27. Further Assurances. The Parties hereto shall execute and deliver, in recordable form if necessary, any and all documents, certificates , instruments, and agreements which may be reasonably required in order to effectuate the intent of the Agreement. Such documents shall include but not be limited to any document requested by the Developer to exhibit that this Agreement has terminated in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 13 above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: ___________ _ Deputy Clerk Witnesses: Wi?ness Printed Name: Se<'c(\\D Cl'<..v-€..., ~Adee Witness A {i' J-/ J Printed Name: fft/5 f1 /,,(CJd [22-SOC-00 939/1742650/I] 9/7 /22 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _____________ _ Chairman GREYST AR DEVELOPMENT EAST, LLC A .PE LIMITED LIABILITY CO. ~- By:~~~ 7 / Printed Name: Le..,,,c, sJro"'e,..bv.r,.,., r Title: \Jru..-'Pnc,;.,~c...,t 11 of30 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1936 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 12 of 30 Approved as to form and legality: Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Legal Description Exhibit B - Affordable Housing Units/Base Monthly Rents Exhibit C - Income and Rent Level Exhibit D - Preliminary Application for Affordable Housing Unit Exhibit E - Applicant Income Verification Exhibit F - Applicant Income Certification Exhibit G -Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT PARCEL 118, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4342, PAGE 3969, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH THIRTY (30) FEET AND 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1937 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 13 of 30 THE EAST THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY. PARCEL 3: THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH THIRTY (30) FEET AND LESS PARCEL 116, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4342, PAGE 3969, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE NORTH THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF AND LESS PARCEL 114, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. B OOK 4342, PAGE 3969, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR IDA. PARCEL 4: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE NORTH THIRTY (30) FEET AND 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1938 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650 /1] 917122 14 of30 THE EAST THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1939 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 15 of 30 EXHIBIT B NU MBER O F AFFORD ABL E HOUSING UNITS/MONTHLY BASE RENTS NUMBER OF UNITS BASE RENT Single Multi Single Multi Family Family Family Family LOW INCOME (50%-80% MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom _ 22 _$885 - $1,415 2 Bedroom _ 21 _$1,061 - $1,698 3 Bedroom _ 4 Bedroom TOTAL 43 (1) Base residential density allowed in this development ±_units/acre. (2) Gross acreage 21.57 (3) Maximum number of affordable housing density bonus units allowed in this development pursuant to LDC Section 2.06.00. 43 units. (4) Gross residential density of this development (including affordable housing density bonus units) 10 units/acre. (5) Percentage of affordable housing units pledged by the developer (as a percent of the total number units in the development) 20% 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1940 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 16 of 30 EXHIBIT C INCOME AND RENT LEVELS FOR THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME Pursuant LDC Section 1.08.02 , moderate income is 80% to 120% of the median income, low income is 50% to 80% of the median income and very low income is less than 50% of the median income. Collier County 2022 Median Income - $98,600 Number of Members in Household 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 50% 33,050 37,750 42,450 47,150 50,950 54,700 58,500 62,250 80% 52,850 60,400 67,950 75,450 81,500 57,550 93,600 99,600 120% 79,320 90,600 101,800 113,160 122,280 131,280 140,400 149,400 140% 92,540 105,700 118,860 132,020 142,660 153,160 163,800 174,300 Rental Rates based on # Bedrooms ONE BEDROOM UNIT TWO BEDROOM UNIT THREE BEDROOM UNIT FOUR BEDROOM UNIT 50% $885 $1,061 $1,226 $1,367 80% $1,415 $1,698 $1,961 $2,188 120% $2,124 $2,547 $2,943 $3,282 140% $2,478 $2,971 $3,433 $3,829 UTILITY ALLOWANCES ONE B/R TWO B/R THREE B/R FOUR B/R LOCATION UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT Naples and Coastal Collier County 71.00 91.00 128.00 156.00 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1941 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 17 of 30 Immokalee and East of Everglades Blvd. 67.00 106.00 148.00 173.00 Golden Gate 96.00 144.00 186.00 211.00 YOU MUST DEDUCT UTILITIES TO CALCULATE NET RENTS. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1942 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 18 of 30 EXHIBIT D PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR AFFORDABLE- HOUSING UNIT Date Occupancy Desired: Date of Application: Amt. Of Sec. Deposit: Your Name: Race/National Origin: Handicap: Yes Co-Tenant Name Race/National Origin: Handicap: Yes No No Present Address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. Name of Landlord How Long at this Address: Landlord’s Address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. If you have resided at your present address less than 3 years, please state previous address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. Name of Previous Landlord Street City State Zip Telephone No. APPLICANT: Present Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Present Employer: Job Title Gross Salary: Hourly $_ Weekly $ Every 2 Weeks $ Monthly $ Social Security Number Birth Date Previous Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Previous Employer CO-TENANT: Job Title Present Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Present Employer: Job Title 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1943 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 19 of 30 Gross Salary: Hourly $_ Weekly $ Every 2 Weeks $ Monthly $ Social Security Number Birth Date Previous Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Previous Employer Job Title 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1944 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 20 of 30 NAMES OF ALL WHO WILL OCCUPY APARTMENT BIRTH DATE SEX AGE SOCIAL SECURITY 1. 2. 3. PERSONAL REFERENCES (Not Relatives) 1. Name: Known: 2. Name: Known: Address: Address: How Long How Long 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1945 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 21 of 30 EXHIBIT E AFFORDABLE- HOUSING APPLICANT INCOME VERIFICATION Date: Applicant’s Name: Social Security Number Co-Tenant’s Name: : Social Security Number Present Address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. I hereby make application for a single family unit at . I hereby declare and reveal all of my sources of income. I am aware that to leave out, omit or fail to report my assets or forms of income from pensions, stocks, bonds, real property rent, sale or ownership is a fraudulent act punishable by law. Knowingly falsifying information on this form is cause for refusal of occupancy. I hereby certify that this will be my permanent residence and that I have no other assisted housing. I understand that this information is for the purpose of computing my annual income to determine my qualification to buy an affordable housing unit. I understand that I am not required to surrender my ownership or rights or claimed property, pensions or capital gains, etc. Applicant Co-Occupant Amount Frequency Amount Frequency Received of Pay Received of Pay Wages/Salary $ Bonuses $ Tips $ Commissions $ Interest Income $ Trust Fund Income $ Unemployment $ Workman’s Compensati on $ Welfare $ Food Stamps $ Social Security $ Social Security Disability $ Supplemental SSI $ Family Assistance $ Child Support $ Veterans Benefits $ Widows Benefits $ 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1946 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 22 of 30 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1947 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 23 of 30 Union Pension $ Self-Employment Business, Silent Partner, etc. $ Private Insurance Pension $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME $ $ THE VERIFICATION HERE REQUESTED MAY TAKE THE FORM OF THE MOST RECENT YEAR’S INCOME TAX RETURN FOR EACH OCCUPANT WHO HAS FILED AND WILL OCCUPY THE AFFORDABLE UNIT. THE SAME MUST BE EXECUTED FOR EACH OCCUPANT OF THE HOUSEHOLD WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME. FAILURE TO REPORT ALL SOURCES OF HOUS EHOLD INCOME WILL RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION FOR TENANCY IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1948 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 24 of 30 EXHIBIT F AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPLICANT INCOME CERTIFICATION APPLICANT: Present Employer: Job Title: Address: Street City State Zip I, , hereby authorize the release of information requested (Applicant) on this certification form. Signature of Applicant 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1949 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 25 of 30 STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing was acknowledged before me by . Who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Witness my hand and official seal this day of , 20 . (notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1950 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 26 of 30 EMPLOYER CERTIFICATION Applicant’s Gross Annual Income or Rate or Pay: $ . Number of Hours Worked (Weekly): . Frequency of Pay: . Amount of Bonuses, Tips, or other Compensation Received: $ $ Monthly Annually Supervisor STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing was acknowledged before me by . Who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1951 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 27 of 30 Witness my hand and official seal this day of , 20 . (notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: THE CERTIFICATION HERE REQUESTED MAY TAKE THE FORM OF THE MOST RECENT YEAR’S INCOME TAX RETURN FOR EACH OCCUPANT WHO HAS FILED AND WILL OCCUPY THE AFFORDABLE UNIT. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1952 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 28 of 30 Exhibit G DEVELOPER APPLICATION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS Pursuant to LDC § 2.06.01 please complete this form and submit it with any accompanying documentation to the Community Development & Environmental Services Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. A copy must also be provided to the Collier County Housing and Human Services Department. All items requested must be provided. 1. Please state what zoning districts are proposed by the applicant, if any, on the property and the acreage of each; RPUD (21.57 Ac.) 2. Has an application for rezoning been requested in conjunction with the affordable housing Density bonus? X Yes No If yes, state date of application 1/18/2022 and if the request has been approved, state the Ordinance number N/A. 3. Gross density of the proposed development. 216 Gross acreage of the proposed development. 21.57 Ac. 4. Are affordable housing density bonus units sought in conjunction with an application for a planned unit development (PUD)? X Yes No. If yes, please state name and location of the PUD and any other identifying information. Santa Barbara-Whitaker RPUD 5. Name of applicant Greystar Development East, LLC Name of land developer if not the same as Applicant: N/A 6. Please complete the following tables as they apply to the proposed development. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1953 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 29 of 30 TABLE I Total Number of Units in Development Type of Owner Unit Rental Occupied Efficiency One Bedroom 72 Two Bedroom 108 Three Bedroom 36 Other Bedroom TOTAL 216 TABLE II Number of Affordable Housing Units Total Number of Proposed Use for Affordable-Work- Density Bonus Units force Units in Development Owner Owner Rental Occupied Rental Occupied 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1954 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 30 of 30 GAP INCOME 120-140% MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Other TOTAL In accordance with LDC Section 2.06.03.D. – All owner occupied MODERATE INCOME 80-120% MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Other TOTAL In accordance with LDC Section 2.06.03.D. – All owner- occupied LOW INCOME 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1955 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 31 of 30 50-80% MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 22 2 Bedroom 21 3 Bedroom Other TOTAL 43 _ VERY LOW INCOME 50% OR LESS MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Other TOTAL _ _ 7. Please provide a physical description of the affordable units by type of unit (very low income, low income, moderate, income, gap income) and by number of bedrooms. Include in your description, for example, the square footage of each type of unit, floor coverings used throughout the unit (carpeting, tile, vinyl flooring); window treatments; appliances provided such 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1956 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO [22-SOC-00939/1742650/1] 9/7/22 32 of 30 as washer/dryer, dishwasher, stove, refrigerator; bathroom amenities, such as ceiling exhaust fans; and any other amenities as applicable. Attach additional pages as Exhibit “D” if needed. There will be no difference between market rate units and affordable units. We anticipate Class A rental finishes including a mix of vinyl and carpet flooring, kitchen island with pendant lighting, stainless steel cooking appliances, washer/dryer, ceiling fans, and standard bathroom amenities with a mix of showers and tubs. 8. Please supply any other information which would reasonably be needed to address this request for an affordable housing density bonus for this development. Attach additional pages if needed. 17.D.3 Packet Pg. 1957 Attachment: Attachment 3 Santa Barbara Whitaker AHDBA revised (10-12-2022) (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ)CAO 17.D.5 Packet Pg. 1958 Attachment: Attachment 5 Sign Postings (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.5 Packet Pg. 1959 Attachment: Attachment 5 Sign Postings (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.5 Packet Pg. 1960 Attachment: Attachment 5 Sign Postings (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.5 Packet Pg. 1961 Attachment: Attachment 5 Sign Postings (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.5 Packet Pg. 1962 Attachment: Attachment 5 Sign Postings (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) 17.D.6 Packet Pg. 1963 Attachment: Attachment 6 Legal Ad (23436 : Santa Barbara Whitaker PUDZ) Co��ler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.co11 iercou ntvfl.eov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDR - (From A and PUD to RPUD ) Date and Time: Wednesday 12 / 2 9 / 21 at 1 : 3 0 PM Assigned Planner: Eric Ortman Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD (PUDR) PL#: 20210003155 Property ID #: See Addressing Current Zoning: A and PUD Theckilst attached Project Address: City: Naples State: FL Zip; 3 4112 Applicant: Robert J Mulhe re , FAI CP ,President /CEO (Waterford Estates PUD) Agent Name: Robert J Mu the re Phone: 254 018 Agent/Firm Address: 950 Encore Wa City: Naples state: FL Zip: 34110 Property Owner: Whitaker Land Holdings LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 21 + / - ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 1 of 5 Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual pions for review in advance if desired. Zoning Division PL20210003155 —Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD(PUDZI Planner: Eric Orman Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO 239-254-2018 • Agent to list for PL# Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Whitaker Land Holdings, LLC — 00409400007,00420400002, 0041972A00071 00422200006 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: Rezone, etc.) A rezone from A and PUD to RPUD for 216 MF units (total 21± acres). • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks zany that apply) A rezone from A and PUD to RPUD for 216 MF units (total 21± acres). • Details about Project: A rezone from A and PUD to RPUD far 216 MF units (total 21±acres). REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Title: President/CEO — Hole Montes, Inc. Emaii: bobmulhere@hmeng.com Phone: 239-254-2018 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas -Client Services Supervisor Consuela.Thomas@colliercountvfl.cTov Created April 5, 2017 Phone: 239-252-2473 Location: G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning Derision • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive •Naples, Florida 3�104.239-252-2400 • ��rr.�rf.coliiergov.net „1 ,,-��._.___ �. _�.....� � . _ _ ..� --_a y ,�.. - i `` �� �� 0 �� �- �O cat• . fi- 5'BK 0 it 0 �.� '4 AF4 ti' �-- � � �� � - '� 1 I �� =- D �, � �_ D” I °J I � iv i ' D �� �' ax� I{ m - � �x �i � (� la rx I�'�V i � i y �� . 1 I� '.�l 11; �� � ,fr o�- �� �. �:,. C� � � �v {OT 0 0 ��8 bf Ib b r� � fiA�..:. - - - _ 1{f' �� �- f ��11�1�Il� i_ r. �l��l[� 1� _' Est. _ _ _'_i � t0 tia fd9'ZO'13l' 36f 95' ��� s�e�• `� :,o.. �. i .� • • _. �.- �� �_ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net :r County ,,._ _ 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: j239� 252-6358 PRC)PERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, percentage of stock owned by each: list the officers and stockholders and the Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 t'... r -��� � i� 'i ' (,✓DI. �eY �✓01�1.1'Lt y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239} 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Co��ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 280o NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 COLDER COUNTY GOV�RNtNENT GROWTH MANAGEMENYDEPARTMENT �n Ww,coIIIerc'ounty,gov 2800 tVORTN. HOpS�Sl1O6DR111� NAPLES,'FLORIDA 84104 (239� 252-Z4(l0.FAXa (239) 25Z-6358 �t]VENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The. undersigned do hereby swear: oraffirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as F61L10 ft 0.0408.46060710042040000210641072AO007 & 00422200000 NAPLE9; F.34112 (Street address and'City, State and Zip0Codej and legally described to ExhlbltA attathad hereto, The property described herein Is the subJect of an application for Reel�enilal planned unit development ( RBDiden11°� PUD) zoning. We� hereby desighate ' 0�"Et°pA� 'T►LLO legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the prop ertiy and as such, these individuals are authorize:d to legally bind 2116owners of the property int the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop, This authority includes,, but is not ilmited to, the hiring a nd authorization of agents to, assTst'In the preparatlon of'applicetions, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site, These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or, amended covenant of unified co trot iS.delivered to Coliler County,. The undersighed recogni2e the foilowtng and will be guided accordingly tn. the pursuit of development. of tihe protect; �.. The property will be developed and used In conformity with the approved master plan Including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connectlon with the planned unit development rezonlntg. 2. The Iegal representative Identified herein Is responsible *for compliance with. all terms; conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval .of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently Sold in whole or In part, unless and until a: new or amended. covenant o� unlfled'controi is delivered to and recorded by collier County, 3, A departure from the provisl6hs. of the approved plans or a� failure to comply with any re.qutrements; conditions, or safeguards providedforinthe planned unit development process will cohstltute*a violation of the Land Development Code. d. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants grid restrictions which run with the land so as to provide.notlee to subsequent.owners that all development activity within the planned unit develop.merit tinust°be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So Fong as this covenant is in force, Collier County can; upon the discoveryof noncompliance with the term!, safeguards, and conditions -of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance, The County will not*tssue permits, certiflcates, or'llcenses to *occupy or use any part of the planned unit deveiopmp,Vand the -county may stop o.ngo)ng construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all ter < bnditlons a safeguards of the lanced unit develb meet► rn , nd g P p POpNA, Pritlfed Narne Owner Printed Name r STATE OF FLt3RIDA cou NTY o t= �� The foregoing instrument was aeknowieged before me by.means of physical presence orjoriline notarization this day of 2Lf-.by (printed name of owner or qua Ifiar) ,CARUO zAMP00NA, !Uf©R 5 . h personas} Notary ublic must check applicable bolt: Are personally kn4own tome Has produced a current drivers license . 13Nas produced f1dentitficatlon%, Notary Seal Notary Signature; March 4, 2020 TARAN,ARMS'rRONO MY COMMISSION � Gt3.345048 EXPIRES: October 11, �023 Eonded ThN N01PY Publio Underwriters Page $ of 11 i LEGAL DESCRI PTI ON PARCEL 1: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT PARCEL 1.18, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4342, PAGE 3969, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PARCEL 2: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESSTHESOUTH THIRTY (30) FEETAND THE EAST THI RTY (30) FEET TH EREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RI GHT-OF-WAY, PARCEL 3: THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH THIRTY (30) FEETAND LESS PARCEL 116, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4342, PAGE 3969, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE NORTH THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF AND LESS PARCEL 114, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4342 PAGE 3969, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PARCEL 4: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST �./4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESSTHE NORTH THIRTY (30) FEETAND THE EAST THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. 1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.co I l i e rco u nty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone. Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up4o-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http:l/www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. # OF REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of 1 (� D why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 El ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 El ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 El ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 � ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included 1 ❑ ❑ on aerial. Statement of Utility Provisions Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. Traffic Impact Study f„� L, ��� 6z ��C�tcTcA PUP �NuM4L Historical Survey School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 1 El n 0 O u 0 March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Co per County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u nty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 341Q4 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Original Amending PUD the document/ordinance, and Master Plan PUD 24" x 36" —Only if D D D Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru &underlined 1 ❑ ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ❑ *lf located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: D D Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C; Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receivin Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c.,the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500fnr information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation &Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams {Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FUR APPLICATION ���. ��' Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre UD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre L� PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Cc� mprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Copier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239} 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Q�CC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5rh and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 Date Page 11 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252=6358 To be completed by staff U PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA)e LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. Name of Property Owner(s): SB Terra, LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: Greystar Development East, LLC Address: 788 E. Las Olas Blvd., Ste. 201 City: Fort Lauderdale State: FL Zip: 33301 -Mail address: ana.pedrajo@greystar.com Name of A ent: Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President g Firm: Hole Montes, Inc. F Address: C 0 1 jagual "11 of city: Naples state: L zIP: 34110 :-Mail Address: paulamcmichaelC�hmeng.com e aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 Co�[�er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov This application is requesting a rezone from: RPUD Zoning district(s). 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Ag and PUD Zoning districts) to the Present Use of the Property: Vacant/undeveloped Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: 216 Multi -Family Dwelling Units Orig final PUD Name: Waterford Estates PUD Ordinance No.: 91-31 On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application. • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting, and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 9 &16 50S j 26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes &Bounds Description: See Survey : Page # Property I.D. Number: 00409400007,00420400002,0041972A0007,00422200006 Size of Propert 1,638.72 ft. x 563 ft. _ 922,600.8o Tota 1 Sq. Ft. Acres: 21 .57± Y Address/ General Location of Subject Property: The northeast & southeast corners of the intersection of Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker Road PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q*6 ❑ Commercial ❑� Residential ❑Community Facilities ❑Industrial Mixed Use ❑ Other: March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coll iercou nty.gov 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Zoning Land Use N A (with approved CU 2019-5) Undeveloped, CU-Church S A, Waterford Estates PUD CC Stormwater Management Lake E A SF Residential, Agricultural Operations, Undeveloped W RMF-6, Estates Santa Barbara Blvd, ROW, Undeveloped If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal descrIN iption of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: �_/, Lot: Plat Book: ivision: Block: Subd Page #: Metes &Bounds Description: Property I.D. Number: Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(sj that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found On the Board of County Commissioner's website at http: www. co I l i e rgov. n et/ I n d ex. a s px? age =774. Name of Homeowner Association: East Naples Civic Association Mailing Address: PMB #49, 8595 Collier Blvd., Ste, 107 City; Naples State: FL Zlp; 34114 Name of Homeowner Association: Royal Wood Master Association Mailing Address: 4300 Royal Wood Blvd. City; Naples Name of Homeowner Association: State: FL ZI p; 34112 Mailing Address: City: State: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: Name of Homeowner Association: ZIP: State: ZIP: Mailing Address: City: State: March 4, 2020 ZIP: Page 3 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. See attached Evaluation Criteria a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 I ley County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u nty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes FN] No if so please provide copies. This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. vertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board o County Commissioners. Base on the - . •. - - • . • .. - . . - Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify named at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the )rdinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply 10 necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co l l i e rco u nty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS Name of A licant s : Greystar Development East, LLC pp tee� Address: pit 788 E. Las Olas Blvd., Ste. 201 Fort Lauderdale State: FL ZIP: 33301 Y of T305-906-0264 N/A :-Mail Address: ana.pedrajo@greysta elephone: r.com Fax: N/A address of subject Property (if available): Santa Barbara Blvd/Whitaker Road cit •Naples Y• Section/Townshi Ran e: Lot: Block: state: FL ZIP: 34112 Subdivision: Metes &Bounds Descri tion: See Survey p 9"M men Property I.D. Number: Check applicable system: a. County Utility System X❑ b. City Utility System ❑ c. Franchised Utility System ❑ d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ e, Septic System 00409400007,00420400002,0041972A0007100422200006 Collier County Water -Sewer District's (CCWSD) regional WTP Provide Name: (GPD Capacity): 50.0 Check applicable system: aI County Utility System Q b. City Utility System ❑ c. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Collier County Water -Sewer District's (CCWSD) regional WTP Total Population to be Served: 216 dwelling units x 2.5 people per unit = 540 people Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 98,280 GPD Average Daily: 751600 GPD Be Sewer -Peak: Average GPM Average Daily: 54,000 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: March 2024 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 Co�[�e� County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Narrative statement: Provide a brief and 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. See attached. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. N/A Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Kimley>>>Horn Utility Narrative Statement The proposed sanitary sewer system will consist of a gravity sewer main system with a series of manholes and laterals to service the proposed multifamily units and club house. The gravity system will be connected to a downstream onsite public lift station located on the northern parcel that will connect to the existing 30- inch force main along Whitaker Road by a public force main. Potable water is not currently available to the proposed site. It is our understanding that potable water will be made available by proposed watermain extensions from the surrounding developments. As part of the proposed project improvements, an 8-inch watermain extension will be required along Whitaker between Sunset Boulevard and the west side of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The proposed watermain system will consist of a water main system being serviced by a public master meter assembly. Due to the site configuration and how the site is split into two different parcels bisected by Whitaker Road, the potential for two master meter assembly's is likely: one servicing each development. All water services, fire services, and fire hydrants will be connected to the onsite watermain system. Connections are anticipated to connect to the newly installed 10-inch watermain along Sunset Blvd. being completed by Christ of King development north of the subject site. See attached service availability letter and schematic water and sewer layout for the project. Further refinement of this plan will be coordinated with the utility department during the design stage. 1 i ley>)) Horn ENGINEER'S DRAINAGE STATEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project includes construction of +/-216-unit multifamily apartment units located on +/- 21.57 acres of primarily vacant land including both uplands and wetlands. The site is situated at the northeast and southeast corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Whitaker Road and is bounded by Sunset Boulevard to the east, in Collier County, Florida. The proposed improvements will include six (6) three story multi -family apartment buildings, cone -story clubhouse, surface parking, and associated drainage infrastructure including two ponds. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project area is located at the northeast and southeast corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Whitaker Road in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Historically the site is located within the Rookery Bay Watershed and contains existing on -site wetlands that discharge to the adjacent waterway to the north and to the existing surface water management area to the south with a discharge rate of 0.06 cfs/acre. The majority of the existing drainage for the project area runoff is captured via wetlands and other forms of surface storage that sheet flows and discharges to the adjacent waterways, surface water management areas, and adjacent roadways. In addition, the surface water runoff along Whitaker Road and Sunset Boulevard are being handled by a series of swales and drainage inlets that convey the stormwater drainage along Whitaker Road to the west of the property. Santa Barbara Boulevard stormwater management system consists of a series of drainage inlets and conveyance pipes that ultimately discharge to the existing waterway to the north and the existing stormwater management area to the south. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The project site is a +I-21.57-acre development with +/-14.54-acre of developable land for the proposed multi -family development that includes six (6) multi -family apartment units and associated stormwater infrastructure. The project includes +/-2.69 AC stormwater management areas and existing acre of wetlands to address the impacts of the existing floodplain due to development. The proposed stormwater management area on the northern property will ultimately discharge to the existing water way to the north and the proposed stormwater management area on the southern property will ultimately connect to the existing infrastructure along Santa Barbara Boulevard and discharge to the existing stormwater management area to the south. Runoff from the multi -family development is imiey>>)Norn collected in the surface water management system via storm pipes and will convey this runoff to the proposed on -site wet detention ponds. The proposed ponds will be used to provide the required treafiment and attenuation based on South Florida Water Management District and Collier County requirements. The proposed development will have no adverse stormwater impacts to the surrounding properties and will follow the design standards set forth by Collier County and South Florida Water Management District. Dgtany �Ignea Dy Sinn EDrahvni ON. CN�ina EDrahiml, S i n a E b ra h i m i O=IQAfLEY ORNANDOASSOCIA ES�a]C=U52 031e. 20 n-05.20 15:2 3 5 &04 W Sina Ebrahimi, P.F. Florida Registration # 82332 Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 1412 Jackson St, Suite 2 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Phone: 239-271-2650 Registry No. 696 t Oocvm•nl, lorrlla •iln lnr c�+cnl. ❑nd Eriyir p�rtrnlr� Warn, o CIt inalrum.nt al trtJcr, ) RirYrr Morn an! Alreoaln. tnC sntl W •iNGI IiC�.tr to Km rT Han ctC A. iac:olrz lee Z ncn 0 � =Dmz m h —I 0 D M�o° DZO Zm50 o z lip 0 c�mz� F=co�w0 o C�CO3 mm cn��Nm* � m � � D z�m>rn �0�=mx rnyW��K X z r M K D cn—ImD mz cn - co -A S U) m D S z 0�= 0 X f�1G�C� y O� O'mDr� i j GNy m —l=qm 0 ci'�m -j m o zm� mZ� rcn- �Oco gmgh DXDD m�mz n O � Z�Z"U coo° < co h llln �N m SS 7 �� C r g L I IN U �U U � e ss ss ss ss ss - �� r m 1J'j J 15 SS 55 y-••— SS T............T .... !I I m O n rn O oDz D Oz� m �D rn D Dcn• C A CO �� ss ss ss ss —.-- Sr z —� ° �•v/— M M M M M M � � 1 ( I W Zm �� I I DD I -��C( �P v I Z(D >cu D om ( �amommomp rliZ I X• OCR I I ; r Ii iln m z r i oca 1 o (A �- m m O '^ -- - m ,� r„ - n � I m oo m I I I O> En v z L D< — G? I 1 1 I m _ I, I i D I � � j I m l cn m � O o •- `a`� \\� I I �0DIz C j -� Sm D D I G z m Z rn f m O (' I D n ��oo co '` I ( r 0 m I C7 oZmo z 1 I I —hl�� �0 I cn 1 m m ? J D 7 I m;u0 m> �m D 0�0 Z7� h m h < r I M D rl m m -0 0 F. _ _ -- — - - - - - — — -- 1 _......._....... ... ........ ...... _4.0.. — — SANTA BARBARA - m WHITAKER RPUD � PREPARED FOR m GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT ou EAST, LLC COLLIER COUNTY FL PROPOSED UTILITY LAYOUT EXHIBIT KHA PROJECT I IJCENSCD PRDFEMIOtULll­ 145202007 DATE 1/13/22 — SCALE AS SHOIYN DESIGNED BY JTN DRAHII BY FAA CHECKED BY SE DATE: Kimley>>> Horn = 2022 KD.IIE'(-HOfiN AND ASS'OCIAlE9, INS 1412 JACKSON STREET, 5111E Z FOiT MYERS, FL 3J901 PMGNE 2J9-271-2650 FAX 941-379-4J52 TfRTf.KIM1Y n RN.COLi CA 00000695 REVI SI OtJ S DATE 8Y Oocvm•nl, lorrlla •iln lnr c�+cnl. ❑nd Eriyir p�rtrnlr� Warn, o CIt inalrum.nt al trtJcr, ) RirYrr Morn an! Alreoaln. tnC sntl W •iNGI IiC�.tr to Km rT Han ctC A. iac:olrz lee Z ncn 0 � =Dmz m h —I 0 D M�o° DZO Zm50 o z lip 0 c�mz� F=co�w0 o C�CO3 mm cn��Nm* � m � � D z�m>rn �0�=mx rnyW��K X z r M K D cn—ImD mz cn - co -A S U) m D S z 0�= 0 X f�1G�C� y O� O'mDr� i j GNy m —l=qm 0 ci'�m -j m o zm� mZ� rcn- �Oco gmgh DXDD m�mz n O � Z�Z"U coo° < co h llln �N m SS 7 �� C r g L I IN U �U U � e ss ss ss ss ss - �� r m 1J'j J 15 SS 55 y-••— SS T............T .... !I I m O n rn O oDz D Oz� m �D rn D Dcn• C A CO �� ss ss ss ss —.-- Sr z —� ° �•v/— M M M M M M � � 1 ( I W Zm �� I I DD I -��C( �P v I Z(D >cu D om ( �amommomp rliZ I X• OCR I I ; r Ii iln m z r i oca 1 o (A �- m m O '^ -- - m ,� r„ - n � I m oo m I I I O> En v z L D< — G? I 1 1 I m _ I, I i D I � � j I m l cn m � O o •- `a`� \\� I I �0DIz C j -� Sm D D I G z m Z rn f m O (' I D n ��oo co '` I ( r 0 m I C7 oZmo z 1 I I —hl�� �0 I cn 1 m m ? J D 7 I m;u0 m> �m D 0�0 Z7� h m h < r I M D rl m m -0 0 F. _ _ -- — - - - - - — — -- 1 _......._....... ... ........ ...... _4.0.. — — SANTA BARBARA - m WHITAKER RPUD � PREPARED FOR m GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT ou EAST, LLC COLLIER COUNTY FL PROPOSED UTILITY LAYOUT EXHIBIT KHA PROJECT I IJCENSCD PRDFEMIOtULll­ 145202007 DATE 1/13/22 — SCALE AS SHOIYN DESIGNED BY JTN DRAHII BY FAA CHECKED BY SE DATE: Kimley>>> Horn = 2022 KD.IIE'(-HOfiN AND ASS'OCIAlE9, INS 1412 JACKSON STREET, 5111E Z FOiT MYERS, FL 3J901 PMGNE 2J9-271-2650 FAX 941-379-4J52 TfRTf.KIM1Y n RN.COLi CA 00000695 REVI SI OtJ S DATE 8Y Co`ffier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercou nty.gov PUD Rezone= Ch. 3 Go 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment D 7 Ch., 3 Go 2 of the Administrative Code r e t e the Administrative 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX; (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. RE UIREMENT'S F COPIES RE UIRE NET REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of whyamendment is necessary Y 1 El a Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 ❑ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 C] ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ 0 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Fx] ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 El ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ FX1 ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Fx I ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 El 1:1 Historical Survey 1 ❑ El School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 El ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 [❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ ❑ [� ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is sep Exhibit arate from t E) Fx] F] Checklist continues on next page March 43 2020 Page 9 of 11 V I I I a P N� m2ma 0 1 U COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ [] Original Amending PUD the document/ordinance, and Master Plan PUD 24" x 36" — Only if Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: U 0 0 C� C Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit Ea.List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)1.c.,the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components); Amy Lockheart F] Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District. ❑ ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ❑ ❑ ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ® Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre /APUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre �I/APUD Amendment: $6,,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 d Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 N7/Alisted or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 � Transportation Review Fees: � Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: � CCPC: $11125.00 � BCC: $500-00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to. Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CE� Printed named of signing party 5-24-2022 Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED REVIEW Name of Development: Santa Barbara &Whitaker RPUD Address/Location: See attached Parcel ID #'s Applicant /Agent: Robert Mulhere &Rich Yovanovich Phone /Email: _(239) 254-2026 / bobmulherei (239) 435-3535 / ryovanovich� Size of Property: 21.57 acres Proposed Use: multi -family residential hmeng.com klawfirm.com Total Number Residential Units Planned: 216 Number of Affordable Housing Units Planned: Rental Rental Rental 44 Rental Rental ied Owner Occup Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied 121 % -140% AMI 81% - 120% AMI 51% - 80% AMI 50% or less AMI ON 30% or less AMI - GAP Income - Moderate Income - Low Income seVery Low Income ow Low Income Permit Number, if available: Proposed Land Use Restriction: x - PUD Restriction or AHDB Agreement - Developer Agreement -Impact Fee Deferral Agreement WINNOW - Grant Restriction - Other: 1 hereby certify that the above described project meets the definition of providing affordable Housing in Collier County and as such is entitled to participate in the County's "Expedited Review Procedures of Affordable Housing" as described in the Collier County Administrative Code through Resolution No. 201840. Digitally signed by La RowJ aCo,,b` LaRowJacob f� Date* 2022.01.20 gy. 20:26:47-05'00' Date: Comp 4inity pnd Human Services Division 1i20i2022 Date: As As a A r/ Developer/ Contractor iths of date of issuance, Community &Human Services Division• 3339 Tamiami Tail. East, Suite_211 • Naples, Florida 34112-53�i1 239-252-CARE �2273} � 239-252-CAFE (2233� • 239-2524230 �R11P} i nor.colliergo�r.nel'lhumanseruices • • LOX, • • • Property I D #'s Folio Number: 00409400007 Name: SIB TERRA, LLC Street# & Name: NO SITE ADDRESS Folio Number: 00419720007 Name: SIB TERRA, LLC Street# & Name: 6050 WHITAKER ROAD Folio Number: 00420400002 Name: SIB TERRA, LLC Street# & Name: NO SITE ADDRESS Folio Number: 00422200006 Name: SB TERRA, LLC Street# & Name: NO SITE ADDRESS iii l LEWIS STONEBtJRNER (print name applicable) of GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT EAST, LLC under oath, that I am the Dose one) owner �� aS VICE PRESIDENT (title, if (company, If a licable), swear or affirm ljcantcontract purchaser and that: � . I have full authorjty to secure the approvals} requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true, 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Vile/I authorize ROBERT MULHERE, PAULA MCMICHAEL & RICHARD YOVANOVICH to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. '�lVoteS: ® If the applicant i a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core, pres. or v. pres. 0 If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.G.), then the documents should (ypically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • tf the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. ® If the applicant is a limited partnersh o then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. ® If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" ® In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the ap propn'ate format for that ownership. The foregoing in t�ument was acknowleged before me by means of � day of �� _ , 20�, , by (painted name of owner or Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ..... Are personally known t0 me 13,.Has I se produced a current driver s Has produced Notary Signature: CP\O8-COA'00115\155 RE'V 3/4/2020 yya as identification. physical�aresence or� online. ,_notarization this qualifier} MYRtAM GAiVOT.A �Not� y pubiic 5t�te of Florida Comm# GG984030 Expires 5/4/2024 ACTION BY V'VRITTEN CONSENT OF 'THE GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT EAST, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company The undersigned, constituting the sole Member of Greystar Development East, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company"), acting in accordance with the provisions of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act and the Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Company dated September 4, 2019, as amended (the "LLC Agreement"), hereby consents to each of the following actions and adopts all of the following resolutions, effective as of January 31, 2020 (the "Effective Date"}. Each capitalized but undefined term whatever used in this Consent shall have the meaning for that term set forth in the LLC Agreement. A�i�►d�i'riti�+�.h��� cif �i��:;I�-�ri d�n:f�. V�►THEREAS, the sole Member has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company to appoint each of the following persons as a Vice President of the Company to serve until their respective successors shall be duly elected or appointed, __ . , _ .. ___ __ . ,unless ,he_ or .she.res_gris,_is., removed, from_ office, or is ,otherwise dis ualif ed from servin . ... .. _ , as a Vice President of the Company: John Clarkson Ben Liebetrau John Roberson Lewis Stoneburner Gary Kerr Matt warren THEF�EFOF�E EE IT RESOLVED, that each of the persons listed immediately above is hereby elected and appointed as a Vice President of the Company, to serve until such time as their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. RESOLVED FURTHER, that each of the persons above have accepted their appointments as a Vice President of the Company, and have agreed to serve until their resignation or removal or until their successors are duly elected and qualif ed. The current officers of the Company, as of the Effective Date, are set forth on .��-��i�►.I�t �. attached hereto, and such �l��bf :A.,, replaces in full the officers listed in Section 7 of� the LLC . ... Agreement. RESOLVED F�CJRTHER; that the officers of the Company, and each acting alone, shall be, and hereby is authorized to take, or cause to be taken on behalf of the Company, any and all actions necessary or appropriate that are normally associated with such office, including without limitation, execution and/or filing of all certificates, documents, and other instruments necessary or appropriate, and to contract for, negotiate on behalf of, and otherwise represent the interests of the Company. The off cers shall perform any and all other acts or activities customary or incident to the day-to-day management of the Company's business, property and affairs. . General Authorization P;.ESOLVED, that the officers of the Company, and each acting alone, is hereby authorized and directed to take all other actions as may be in his or her judgment necessary, proper, or advisable to carry out and comply with the purposes and intent of the foregoing resolutions; and that all the actions of the officers consistent with the purposes and intent of these resolutions of the Company that are are in all respects hereby approved, ratified, confirmed, and adopted as the actions of the Company. IN 'WITNESS '�►�HET:EOF, the undersigned sole Member has executed this 'Written Consent as of the Effective Date. S C)LE MEMBE�t: Greystar Development, LLC a Delaware limited. lj-'�I�ity� company _. _.,,_ . B�- --.. y• Name: Scott Wise Title: Vice President Exhibit A List of Officers (as of January 3I, 2020) Robert A. Faith —President William C. Maddux -- Vice President J. Derek Ramsey —Vice President Scott Wise —Vice President Ashley Reggie --Vice President Cliff Nash —Vice President Todd Wigfield —Vice President Julie Skolnicki --Vice President John Clarkson -- Vice President Ben Liebetrau —Vice President John Roberson —Vice President Lewis Stoneburner —Vice President Cary Kerr --Vice President Matt �t�Varren --Vice President AIFFIIaAV'IT C)F AUThIt�R1�ATI+C�[� FC�►R P�TI`rION iVUM8�R5{S� P� ��1�c�s��5 �.._.� - CARGO ZAMPOGNA applicable} of ssTE�a�n, ��c under oath, that I am the (choose one) c�wn (print name), as ��,�,� {title, If {company, If ap lcable�, swear or affirm 'r applicant �confiract purchaser and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval{s) requested and to impose crwenants and restrictions on the referenced properly as a result of any action approved by the County in acpordance with this application and the Land t�eveloptnent Code; 2. All answers to the questions In this application ar�d any sketches, data nr other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; �. I have authorized the staff of Goilier Co�r�ty #o enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that �. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the .approved action. Jr. �%efl authorize noes �+�a��isflN CiiR�CTOR, GR�SvSTAF� DEVEI.CIPMENT EAST, �.�.c to act aS ourfmy representative in any matier� regarding this petiti©n including �1 through 2 above. `Notes: • if the appllcattt is a corporation, Then It is usually executed by the core. pres. or tr, pt�s. ® lr the appllcant is a Limited t.icbility Company (L.C.. C`.� ot- Limited Company (L.+C. j, then the doeurnents should typicglly be signed by tha Company's `Managing lVlcrn►t�er,,, if the applicant is a ,partnership, then typically a partnar can sign an behalf of the partnership. Ir the applicant is a /united partrtershlp, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the- named partnership. if the applicant is a trust, Then they rr�ust include the trustee's Warne and the words "as trusteeA • /n each instance, �rsf dete�rnr"ne the appftoanf'S staftrs, e.g., it�d'ividual, corporate, trusl�, partnership, and then use the appropriate �orrnat for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authori�atlon and that the facts stated 1t�t �t are -true. ! "" .. • • r � a •:. • • +� r .•M ..• c •• .� ' • - � • a Has produced a current drivers iic�nse [� INas produced N©tart' Signature; +CP144-COA tlbi�S1155 �tEV 3/4i�Qz© s identification. nce or '�-, TARA N. AR�+ISTRUNG '��� MY COMMISS�OiV # GG 3450d8 �►;; E�tPtRES: C�clpber 1t, 2023 bonded Thn1 Notary Pub11c �lnderwrilets ..,. ___ �r'�zation this COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier�ov.net Greystar Development East, LLC 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, F�ORI DA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as � tenancy in ►ell as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A b. If the property is owned by a C�RPORATIC}N, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Created 9/28/2�17 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier�ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLC►RIDA 34104 (239j 252-2400 FAX: (239j 252-5358 d. If the property is in the name Of a GENERAL or LIMITED P general and/or limited partners: TN_ERSHIP, list the Warne of the Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f. Name and Address % of Ownership Contract Purchaser: Greystar Development East, �.LC 100% 788 E. Las Olas Blvd., Ste. 201, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Robert A. Faith (directly or indirectly), 465 Meeting Street, Suite 500, Charleston, SC 29403 68% Other individuals (directly or indirectly), each owning less than S%, and, to the knowledge of the 32% individuals is a government employee or an elected official (or their respective spouses] for or within Date of Contract: 12/8/21 If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ leased: Term of lease Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Ct�ILIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GRa'WTH' NtAIVAGEM�NT DEPARTMENT www.coilier�ov.net __ 28a0:NCiRTH HORSESHOE DRIVE IVAPLES, FIORIDA 34�t?4 (239� 252-24�� FI�C: (239� 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: _ , Qr Anticipated closing date: .:-, .. .. �� �: UNERSHlP INFQ�.MATIONi . � :.( , �� . .. .. ,. Any petition requited to have Property ownership Disclosure, wit! not be accepted. without this form. Requirements for petition types acre located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually � or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier Coun tY imr�nediatety if such change occurs prior to the petition's final�public heating. As the.authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest�that all of the information indicated on fihis checklist is included in this submittal�package. l understand that failure to Include all necessary submittal information ma result in the delay of processing�this petition. The completed�application, all required submittal�materials, and. fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department A1TN; Business Center 2800=North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Date Lewis Stonebumer, VIce�President, Greystar�Developmeht.East, LLC Agent/owner Name (please printj Created �/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 t SB Terra, LLC COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.Colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPILES, FLORIDA 34104 �239) 252=2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A b. If the property is owned by a CaRP�RAT QN, percentage of stock owned by each: list the officers and stockholders and the Name and Address % of ownership N/A c. If the property is in the percentage of interest: name Of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Co��er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT � 2$0� NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPI.ES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collier�ov.net (239j 252-2400 FA�C: �239� 252-6358 f. C� If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: ________ Name and Address % of Ownership SB Terra, LLC 1333 3rd Ave. South, Ste. 505, Naples, FL 34102 Carlo Zampogna, MGR 100% If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired 11-30-2021 Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option t0 buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 C4l��.IER COUNTY C01lERIV.M�NT ��Rt�WTH NIANAGEM�N1' DEPARTMENT ,www,� colli_er�ov.net Date of option � w����r��....... 2800 .Nt�RTH WOR5E5H4E� �DR1VE NAPlES, FLCiR1DA 3�1�4 �23'9j Z52-24.00 FAX; t2�gj 252�6358 Gate op�cian �terminates�:� �� or Anticipated, closing date: AF�IRIUI' pRQRERTY OWNERSHIQ INFORMATION Aiiy petition required ta� have Property Ownership bis�losure, r�iill not. be- accepted v�rithout� this form. Regiaiirements#or petition types are located on .the:associated �applica�ion for�ri. Any cha�ge�in� owner` hip whether. intlividualty or with a Trustee, company or :other interest -holding pariy,� iriust be disclosed to Coili�r bounty immediatelyif�such change oc�u�rs prior to�the petitionts final public hearing. As the authorized agerit�applicant for this petition; I attest that all .of the information indicated.:on-this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include:al) necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this "petition. The :completed .app�lic.ation, .all re.quire+d submittal �rrtaterials,. and. fees shall, be submitted to: Grovirth� Management Departrnen.t �ATfN:� Business Center �2800 North Horseshoe Drive � Naples,. FL 341�04 Agentf r Sigure- wrier Nam �e r. r� (�,t. �� Created 9%�28�201,7 � Page.3.��of COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252�2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD Addressing a)colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed bu Addressing personnel prior to pre-applicat an, meetinq„_�please allow 3 days for processlnq. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOL10 NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 mon#hs will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit} ❑ BD {Boat Dock Extension} ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit � CU (Conditional Use) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit} ❑ FP {Final Plat ❑ LLA {Lot Line Adjus#ment} ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ PPL (Plans &Plat Review) ❑ PSP {Preliminary Subdivision Plat) � PUD Rezone ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone} ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) Q SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal &Site Fill Permit) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) Section 9, Township 50S, Range 26E FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00409400007,00419720007,00420400002,00422200006 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way � SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (ifapplicablej SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL# Rev. 619/2017 Page 1 of 2 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,collier�;ov.net Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, indicate whether proposed or existing Please Return Approved Checklist By: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239j 252-2400 FAX (239j 252-5724 � Email ❑ Fax ❑ (if application; Personally picked up Applicant Name: Paula McMichael, AICPIStephanie Karol, Permitting Coordinator/Mole Montes, Inc Phone: 239-254-2018 EmaillFax: stephaniekarol h meng, com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the operations Division. FOR STAPF USE ONLY . �- Folio Number o041��2000� Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Updated by: 00420400002 00422200006 Date: 12/23/2021 Date: Rev, 6/912017 Page 2 of 2 INSTR 6167120 • ' 6049 .1942 LERK OF • �• @ ! $30,800.00 ! • 40011! /i f Prepared by: ELIZABETH BLANCO, ESQ. 13318 SW 128 STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186 RETURN TO: GREY STREET TITLE CORP 711 5ni AVE, SOt1TK #200 NAPLES, FL 34102 .N \4ee t f OF to IF It IF This Special W' <ra,IF I I3oldings, LLC, a Florida .. r it Street, Miami, FL 33186 head whose address is '3IIIIII � 3 � ••0 ! SPECIAL WA DE )eed made this day of November, 2g21, BETV��EEN VYhitaker Land % is c/oB & Z Services Corp, 13320 SW 128 lability Company, whose address I. t e "Gr��ntor," SB Terra, LLC, a Florida limited liability company Al romo hereinafter called the "Grantee(s) �d grantee include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal re resentatives, and assigns of indiviu S. and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) p . 4.. ,:, - . a �r.. �` galled �-- .5 9 (Whenever used herein the terms 'ir Witnesseth that said , for and in�:�c�ins:% . � ,ration of the sum TEN AND NO/10q DOLLARS ($10.00) and F. • other good and valuable considerations tali saw, �x��Mor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby g -' grantee, and grantees heirs and assigns forever, the acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sdti,e said grant g g followin described land, situate, lying and b .ti n Ilier County,Florida, to -wit: g Y g ft `f Parcel One: The East %Z of the Northwest '/4 of the;., orb Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,Frr * thirty (30) feet thereof reserved for road right-of-way. described within an Order of Taking recorded in Offcill Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel T`vc�: The East '/z of the Southwest 1A4 of the Nc Township 5 0 South, Range 26 East, Co11 ier C ounty, F: Feet and the East thirty (30) feet for road right-of-way; And Pest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16, t ess the South thirty (30) feet and the East tIng, therefrom those applicable lands as c'r Book 5109, Page 3087, of the Public '4.: -= ``.- , . V to IF _ , �ti thwest '/4 of Section 16, from the North thirty (30) The East '/z of the Northwest '/4 of the Southwest '/4 of the Northwest '/a�o eC Collier Count Florida, reserving therefrom the'*.,,: -�t�t: South Range 26 Fast , y, .... .:, ion 16, Township 50 ir�y (30) feet and the South thirty (30) feet for road right-of-way. Parcel Three: The South '/2 of the Southwest 1/4of the Southwest 1/4 of the So`°- ::v` '!, Section 9, 26 East Collier County, Florida. Excepting therefr� tIF % `, applicable lands Township 50 South, Range tY as described within in an Order of Taking recorded in Off cial Records Book 4342, Pig a _3�969, of the Public Records of Collier Coun ty,Florida. ~ Parcel Four: The West '/z of the NW '/4 of the NW `/4 of the NW 1/4, less the South 30 feet thereof; D the West % of the SW '/4 of the NW '/4 of the NW '/4, less the North 30 feet thereof; AND the West AN , all in Section 16 Township 50 '/z of the NW '/4 of the SW '/4 of the NW A, less the South 30 feet thereof, a p Range 26 East Collier County, Florida. Excepting therefrom those applicable lands as described South, g Y . ' Within the Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 4342, Page 3969, and in Official Records wit g Book 5109, Page 308'7, both of the Public Records of Collier County, Flo41 rida. tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining Together with all the . To Haire ani3 to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. k** OR 6049 PG 1943 *** f And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under grantors, ;. Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered i Witn�s�s,Name: State of Flo County of r rids rliami- sence: (' V IiAak ,/ •, Whitaker Land Holdings, LI��a Florida Limited Liability Compare By�: & Soleil Z S ervi David Brady, President The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before,• . oIsline notarization, this day of November, 2021 by. Florida Corporation, Sole Manager of, Whitaker Land Holdings [ ] is/are personally known or [x] has/have produced a driver's lii [Seal] Notary Publ�t -State of Florida �r ' ; r `�t� p Cornmfss�on � NN 429721 r �:j My Comm Expires Aug 6, 2024 Fended through National Notary Assn, means of [x] physical presence or [� �dy, President, B & Z Services Corp, a Florida Limited Li identification. Notary lii�=. Print N •'��� (Commission ability Company who t y ", ` •. .� ♦ _ let ...w '-j R •' a - .' - .---fig -.. _ - - - - - - - - -) �j.�.'•�C,�•.�•.Y♦ •'.{:.+r•f..;T� .t•C ����`\';.�' .•Y��.Y�* ♦al ter a-S' ''�`• . • ' i 4 1 �' - at L •4 �" i . , , '�' "I: ,•.• , ` • IWArEy,• • t i! i •d► . 1. 'r-'�-'•i • 7r OF ' fir. AV ff I Map _ • - •, � �y1�►yt • - - I Vie Eta, MA 7 A� ,` 9 i V•aor y+a ..� •'.� , !tom ' w 'a Oft 16 -��` •!%i aft IV A do iTlaw r it _4 + i, ena L S 1 0 It it X+ • ` '7 at mil.• �• w t "a qsa im lianavot find j• t ---- s tt ,It a AGO Poll lit Ole vis all I AV a OP Ila Oak avator F so 410116 WIN r 10 Or take of VIA a mot V all A aaa to - .- �.. -, . • w-r, • . - - ..�...... .. �.�,.... 0 a " - Oh l ;:,� i sall, "16 a to Ila Sonata at *0 all A I at IDIOM •t�'.4 494 at It or Joe 1 44 a oI . •� �_ Ob ♦ r elf 4100tr0 0 • ' ► . 40 Asia oa Pat audit Aat 4vND AI # t �.10 �" i _ _.•. — t I I • I OF 1 . •me ONION at IyI W "NOW f _- __ __ _ 4&VO i ti'fe 01W j _+ RWar v- Or do i e ; .b .t =�_:. ti See � ,� t �'i� . MY 46 i ! v •�s �" l w • _ at `tA + , all fa .i tit .�. ` �«' ( _ ota -t �� s ' y r ' .. ref'• •. • 1 •�y, ! . , IL In �. r '"' ► Of All to w ,l ire' Vow it All, W ' �.r ' r 1 -' v J. .. ry i.� .. !fa tall two Vals *--"4Ok map Poll 2 ! It as to %a or See in Seat 1110 of MIND • I. s' 111110 �. ...R y t { � _�. NoI lop,w � ' �'^ +r�� wi am vIma IIS � ` saw - 7 f � iwr lb� v 0 It •est _~� }" T • ! Via tr r' Jf M l� Jw �S ..�i fae OIL �1. wit! i•+•t ! - it .~i .. So + t� ti 71 ry 1t t Jam! on a.. j �� at a kla t ONION at i fi s �J 4W'! 'WNW avp an w V w ► tea Seek ift Santa so took, an Met See 8 look a• t:• wIla IRS -•:. +f`. f .+ . t, APP It lifd// ," a • r - .'� •� �a ' • L ` '. !' 1 1 s't�' '1►at' 4 '�. :� I'! Aw t }: two 1 �.:., � • -� f . k • , % IV : -.'! It R + • � � 1 r � ' � ', >! !fir• a ` IW • - ♦ i "y • _ or 41b do -past r ice! ','• ' ' � J r' �� . » •��, ; r'� t ��' { ,,.p _Soo.. ft � r v too alai 16 IF so Abwdb am ANSI 484ti��� ' lk� 'I - ,� a -�•NO gs' `• •• •e •4�*' .• +4 t + ,A :',. �: •!t : bid 1.. ""' ♦k 14 i♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ , REZONE CRITERIA 10.02.08.F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and accommodations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08.E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed change is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUEI goals, objectives, and policies; and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) 2. The existing land uses pattern. and the goals The proposed rezone is compatible with the existing land use pattern. Property to the north is zoned A- Agricultural with an approved Conditional Use permitting a church and is undeveloped. The proposed development includes a preserve along the northern boundary. Property to the south is zoned A — Agricultural and PUD (Waterford Estates) and is developed with a Collier County Stormwater Management Lake. Property to the east, across Sunset Blvd., is zoned A — Agricultural and partially developed with single-family residences and agricultural operations. The proposed development includes an enhanced Type D buffer and a proposed setback of 90 ft. to the east. The remaining property to the east is undeveloped. Property to the west, across Santa Barbara Blvd., is RMF-6 — Residential Multi-Family-6 District and is undeveloped. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. This rezoning will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries conditions in the neighborhood. Existing boundaries were not illogically neighborhood. are illogically drawn in relation to i exsting drawn in relation to existing conditions in the 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 11 Changing conditions do not snake the passage of the proposed amendment necessary; however changing conditions do make the proposed amendment desirable and appropriate. Market conditions at the present time make it feasible to allow for viable multi -family residential development. H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\Rezone Criteria (1-18-2022).docx 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The development standards proposed ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses or otherwise affect public safety. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The site will be designed problems will be created. to meet all County and SFWMD requirements. No drainage Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development standards and perimeter landscape buffers assure the proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not lien deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Of special privilege to an The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\Rezone Criteria (1-18-2022).docx The existing zoning does not allow for the proposed density, which will further meet and address, to a significantly greater degree, the County's housing needs. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance; however, the AG zoning does not result in the highest and best use of the property. The site is designated Urban Residential Subdistrict, and there are sufficient public facilities to support the proposed residential density. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use; however, the proposed development is the highest and best use of this property as it is within urban Collier County, adjacent to residential development and property with existing zoning that permits multi -family residential, and there are sufficient public facilities to serve the site. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property and. the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification is typical of and not different from any other similar development in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, Art. II, as amended.] There is availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and Implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to serve the project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC. H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\Rezone Criteria (1-18-2022).docx SANTA BARBAR.A — WTITAKER RPTJD EVALUATION CRITERIA per LDC SEC. 10.02.13.B.5 A. The suitability VW area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. This is a request for a rezone to RPUD to allow for a total of 216minti-family residential dwelling units (±10 dwelling units per acre (DU/ac)). The proposed RPUD is consistent with all applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies of the County's Growth Management Plan (GMP). The subject site is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The site has access to County provided central water and sewer and all other urban public services. The site is suitable for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic access, drainage, sewer, water and other utilities, and public services, and there are no limitations regarding the physical characteristics of the land that would limit its suitability for what is existing and proposed. The requested density of ± 10 DU/ac was calculated using a base density of 4 DT/ac and requesting an Affordable Housing Density Bonus of up to 6 DU/ac as permitted by LDC 2.06.03, which allows a bonus of 6 un/acre as a min. of 20 percent of the units will be restricted to residents making >50% to <_80% of the area median income. B. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. Evidence of unified control is provided with this application. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -District, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -District, policy or other provision.) I. Urban Residential Subdistrict The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The RPUD will result in multifamily development in urban Collier County on a site that can connect to existing public facilities; and is consistent with all applicable GMP Goals, Objectives and Policies. Please see the compliance narrative below. Page 1 of 4 H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\3rd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 7-12-2022).docx II. Compliance with additional GMP provisions. Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan... The subject site is designated Urban Mixed I Urban Residential Subdistrict. The requested density is typical for Urban areas in Collier County. Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map, requiring that any additions to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. The subject site and. adjacent parcels are designated. Llrban Residential Subdistrict. The proposed, development discourages sprawl as it is adjacent to the east to residential development. Wastewater service is available to serve the site. Potable water service is anticipated to be readily available to the project via a proposed water main along the west side of Sunset Boulevard per the approved plans for adjacent development to the north. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The proposed uses are compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses, which include residential development. Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The site has access to an existing connection to Santa Barbara Boulevard (a collector road) via Whitaker Road, a local road that bisects the project. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Page 2 of 4 H:\2021\2021162\wP\PUDZ\3rd Resubmittai\Evaluation Criteria (rev 7-12-2022).docx The site has both a primary and secondary entry in compliance with this policy. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The development will connect into the surrounding neighborhood through the existing local street network. Policy 7.4: The County shall communities with a blend of range of housing prices and type 1 encourage new developments to provide walkable densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a s. The development connects to the existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the Santa Barbara Blvd. right -of --way that serve the surrounding area. The proposed multi -family residential development helps Collier County achieve a blend of densities, and a range of housing prices and types. Policy 7.5: The County shall encourage mixed -use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This Policy shall be implemented through provisions in specific Subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. Not applicable. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element notes that all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five-year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. There i s no s i projected to p gnificant impact associated with a roadway segment already operating and/or Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element interconnection of local streets between movement throughout the road network. shall require, developments wherever feasible, the to facilitate convenient The development will connect with the surrounding neighborhood. through the existing local street network. D. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Page 3 of 4 H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\3rd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 7-12-2022).docx The RPUD, allowing residential uses, is compatible with the surrounding land uses, which are predominantly residential. The site has been designed with preserve areas abutting property to the north and significant preserves along the west (Santa Barbara) and will provide significant setbacks for principal structures to the east (Sunset). The property is abutted on the south by a stormwater management lake. Land uses adjacent to this RPUD include: North: Undeveloped; with an approved Conditional LJse for a Church. South: Collier County Stormwater Management Lake. East: Agricultural; single-family residential. West: Santa Barbara Boulevard; undeveloped. E. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as development, proposed to serve the The RPUD provides adequate usable open space in accordance with LDC Sec. 4.07.02.G. F. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the a available improvements and facilities, both public and private. dequacy of Wastewater service is readily available to serve the project. Potable water is currently not readily available to serve the site, however, water service is anticipated to be readily available via a proposed water main along the west side of Sunset Boulevard per the approved plans for a church being constructed to the north. If this water main extension is not complete, the developer of the proposed development will extend the water main to serve the site. G. The ability expansion. of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate There are no issues that would limit the ability of the subject property or the surrounding areas to accommodate the expansion. H. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The RPUD conforms to the LDC regulations, or contains deviations there from, where appropriate. Page 4 of 4 H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\3rd Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 7-12-2022).docx Deviation 1 (Preservation Standards) requests relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5, Preservation Standards, which requires that preservation areas shall he interconnected within the site, to allow preservation areas that are not interconnected as shown on the Master Concept Plan. Justification: The minimum required native preservation is �i.99 (25% of f15.94 acres of existing native vegetation). There are four preserve areas proposed, as shown on the Master Concept Plan. The northern preserve area is f4.56 acres and consists of t1.08 acres of Melaleuca and ±3.48 acres of Pine/Oak/Cypress. Although the portion of the preserve containing Melaleuca does not contribute to the projects required native vegetation for the purposes of this application, that area will be cleared and restored during site development. Once restored, the northern preserve area acreage will exceed what is required. There are three non-contiguous preserve areas totaling ±2.43 acres: one north of Whitaker; and two south of Whitaker. The preserve areas will be enhanced through the removal of exotic vegetation, and, where needed, supplemental plantings will be installed to provide additional cover by native vegetation. These areas preserve existing wetlands, provide additional buffering and screening of Santa Barbara Blvd., and provide a more aesthetically pleasing view for the proposed units. Page 1 of 1 H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\2nd Resubmittal\Deviation and Justification (rev 5-24-2022).docx January 2022 Prepared For: G�eysta� Development East, LLC. 465 Meeting Street, Suite S00 Charleston, South Carolina 29403 (305) 906-0264 Prepared By: Passa�ella � Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 Project No. 21GGG3696 • Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Env1 ro n m e ntal D at a Author . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 V e g etat 1 o n D e S Cr 1pt l o n S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ListedSpecies Survey....................................................................................................................4 Native Vegetation Preservation.....................................................................................................4 References......................................................................................................................................6 11 Exhibit 1. Proj ect Location Map.........................................................................................E 1- l Exh lb It 2 . Aerl al W1th B ou n dary......................................................................................... Exhibit 3 . Aerial with FLUCFC S anal Wetlands Map ........................................................ E3 -1 Exhibit 4. Native Vegetation Map...................................................................................... E4-1 Exhibit 5 . Listed Species Survey........................................................................................ ES-1 111 Table l . Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages............................................4 iv INTRODUCTION The following environmental data report is provided in support of the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) application for Santa Barbara Whitaker RPUD (Project). The Environmental Data Report was prepared in accordance with the Collier County Environmental Data Report submittal requirements outlined in Chapter 3.08.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The 21.59� acre Project site is located in Section. 9 and 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Exhibit 1). More specifically, the Project is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately 1.0 mile north of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard (Exhibit 2). The Project is bordered to the north by undeveloped, forested land; to the south by a stormwater management pond; to the east by low density single-family residential development; and to the west by Santa Barbara Boulevard. The Project site is comprised mainly of undeveloped, forested uplands and wetlands that have been invaded to various degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus teNebinthifolia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auNiculifoNmis), and Australian pine ((.1asuarina equisetifolia). The following Environmental Data Report includes details regarding the author of this report, vegetation descriptions for the various ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AUTHOR habitats on -site, results of the listed species survey This Environmental Data Report was prepared by environmental credential and experience requirements Report, per Section 3.08.00 of the Collier County LDC. Bethany Brosious. She satisfies for preparing the Environmental the Data Ms. Brosious is an Ecologist with PAI, with over 15 years of consulting experience in the environmental industry. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Animal Sciences from the University of Florida and a Master of Science degree in Environmental Science from Florida Gulf Coast University. VEGETATION DESCRIPTIONS The existing vegetative communities on the property include forested uplands and wetlands with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The vegetation associations for the property were delineated using December 2020 Collier County rectified color aerials (Scale: 1" = 200') and groundtruthing conducted in January 2022. These delineations were classified based on the nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) Levels III and IV (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). Level IV FLUCFCS was utilized 1 to denote disturbance, and "E" codes were used to identify levels of exotic species invasion (e.g., melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and Brazilian pepper). AutoCAD Map 3D 2022 software was used to determine the acreage of each mapped polygon, produce summaries, and generate the final FLUCFCS map (Exhibit 3). A total of 11 vegetative associations and land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified on the Project site. The dominant habitat type on the Project site is Pine/Oak/Cypress, Disturbed (50 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3), accounting for 24.5 percent of the property (5.28± acres). Exotic vegetation documented on -site includes, but is not limited to, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and Australian pine. The degree of exotic infestation ranges from 25 to nearly 100 percent cover. The Project contains 6.99� acres of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and/or State 404 jurisdictional wetlands and 0.37± acre of SFWMD other surface waters and State 404 waters (Exhibits 3 and 4). The jurisdictional wetlands identified by FLUCFCS code include: 1.08� acres of Melaleuca, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 4241), 0.63± acre of Pine/Oak/Cypress, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2) (2549% Exotics), and 5.28± acres of Pine/Oak/Cypress, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3) (50-75% Exotics). The on -site wetlands contain a large amount of exotic vegetation including Brazilian pepper, earleaf acacia, and melaleuca. The OSW/Waters habitat on -site is comprised of a 0.37� acre roadside ditch and is identified as Ditch/Canal (FLUCFCS Code 514). The following is a description of each FLUCFCS classification. Pine Flatwoods, DisturbedExotics LUCFCS Code 4119 E2 The canopy of this upland habitat is primarily slash pine (Pinus elliottii) with scattered live oak (Quercus virginiana), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). The sub -canopy is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) with myrsine (Myrsine cubana), cabbage palm, and cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco) throughout. Earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper are also found scattered throughout the sub - canopy. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto and includes pennyroyal (Piloblephis Nigida), greenbrier (Smilax-spp.), muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron Nadicans). Pine, Disturbed (2549% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E2) The canopy of this upland habitat is comprised of widely scattered slash pine with earleaf acacia, melaleuca, cabbage palm, and live oak. The sub -canopy is composed of melaleuca, earleaf acacia, Brazilian pepper, cocoplum, live oak, and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia). The ground cover is mostly open but includes live oak, muscadine grapevine, greenbrier, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. 2 Pine Disturbed (50-%5% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3 This habitat type is similar to Pine, Disturbed (2549% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E2) with higher densities of melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia. Pine, Disturbed (76-100%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E4) This habitat type is similar to Pine, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3) with higher densities of melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia. Melaleuca, I-�vdric (FLUCFCS Code 4241) This wetland habitat type is dominated by melaleuca with widely scattered slash pine and earleaf acacia. The sub -canopy is also dominated by melaleuca and includes scattered myrsine, wax myrtle (Morella ceNifera), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is mostly bare, with a limited amount of swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatunz). Mixed Exotics (FLUCFCS Code 439 This habitat type has a canopy that is primarily open with scattered Java plum (Syzygium cumini), earleaf acacia, and an occasional cabbage palm. The sub -canopy is dominated by Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is mostly bare, with scattered Brazilian pepper and wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa). Ditch/Canal (FLUCFCS Code 514 This habitat type consists of an excavated ditch that bisects the northern portion of the Project site. The canopy is open. The sub -canopy is primarily open but includes Carolina willow (Salix calloliniana) and Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peNuviana). Emergent vegetation in the ditch included torpedograss (Panicum repens), creeping primrosewillow (Ludwigia repens), spadeleaf (Centella asiatica), and turkey tangle fogfruit (Phyla nodiflora). Pine/Oak/C�press, DisturbedExotics LUCFCS Code 6249 E2 The canopy. of this wetland habitat consists primarily of slash pine anal bald cypress, and includes cabbage palm, melaleuca, and laurel oak. The sub -canopy includes slash pine, bald cypress, cabbage palm, dahoon holly, cocoplum, myrsine, melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is dominated by swamp fern, with scattered cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. Pine/Oak/Cvpress, Disturbed (50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3) This habitat type is similar to Pine/Oak/Cypress, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2) with higher densities of melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia. Spoil Berm (FLUCFCS Code 743 This land use consists of a spoil berm located along an on -site ditch. Road/Trail (FLUCFCS Code 814 This land use type consists of roadways and the associated Right -of --Ways. 3 LISTED SPECIES SURVEY A listed plant and wildlife species survey was conducted by PAI on the Project site on January 8, 2022. No listed wildlife species were documented during the survey. Scattered occurrences of three listed plant species, stiff -leaved wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), inflated wild pine (Tillandsia balbisiana), and butterfly orchid (Encycha tampensis) were observed during the listed species survey. The stiff -leaved wild pine is listed. as endangered. and inflated wild pine is listed as threatened by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) respectively, and the butterfly orchid is listed as commercially exploited. All three species are included on the Collier County "Less Rare Plant List." None of the species documented on -site are federally listed. The listed species survey methodology and results are provided as Exhibit 5. NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVATION The 21.59� acre Project site is comprised of 15.94� acres of native vegetation. Areas comprised of melaleuca or other mixed exotics, along with the on -site ditch, berm, and roadway, were classified as non-native vegetation and have been excluded from the native vegetation calculation (Exhibit 4). Section 3.05.07.B.1 of the Collier County LDC requires the retention and preservation of 25 percent of the on -site native vegetation for a residential development in the non -coastal high hazard area, which for this Project equates to a 3.99� acre preserve requirement (i.e., 15.94� acres of native vegetation x 0.25 = 3.99� acres of required native vegetation preserve) (E�ibit 4). Table 1 provides a summary of the native vegetation communities on -site and the native vegetation preservation calculation. Table 1. Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages FLLTCFCS Code Description Native Vegetatlon Acreage Non -Native . egetatlon Acrea e 4119 E2 Pine Flatwood, Disturbed 2549% Exotics 2073 - 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed (2549% Exotics) 1.76 - 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 4.67 - 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed 76400% Exotics 0.87 - 4241 Melaleuca, H dric - 1.0 8 439 Mixed Exotics - 3.40 514 Ditch/Canal - 0037 6249 E2 Pine/Oak/Cypress, Disturbed 2549% Exotics 0.63 - 6249 E3 Pine/Oak/Cypress, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 5.28 - 743 Spoil Berm - 0.17 Table 1. (Continued) ELI7CFCS Native Non -Native Code Description Vegetation Vegetation Acreage Acrea e 814 Road/Trail - 0.63 Total ( 15.94 I 5.65 Minimum Retained Native Vegetation Requirement 3.99 lative Vegetation Acreage, 15.94E Acres x 25 Percent) The applicant proposes to preserve and enhance 3.99� acres of native vegetation in the northern. portion of the Project site. In addition, the applicant proposes to preserve other wetland habitat located throughout the Project site; however, these areas will not be utilized to satisfy the Collier County native vegetation preservation requirement. Please see the Master Concept Plan for the location of the on -site preserve areas. The proposed location of the Collier County native vegetation preservation area allows for habitat connectivity to the undeveloped land located to the north and east of the Proj ect. Enhancement activities within the preserve areas will include the removal of exotic vegetation and supplemental plantings of native vegetation where needed. The Project site contained. no xeric scrub, dune, strand, hardwood hammocks, wetlands with a Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure score of at least 0.65, or upland habitat that serves as a buffer to high quality wetlands. The location of the native vegetation preservation area was selected to be consistent with Section 3 005.07.A..) of the Collier County LIDC as well as to provide connectivity to undeveloped land to the north and east of the Proj ect. As previously noted, these areas will also be enhanced through exotic vegetation removal and supplemental planting of native vegetation. This activity will improve the quality of habitats on - site and off -site through the elimination of exotic and nuisance species seed sources. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT CONSISTENCY The Project as proposed is consistent with the Policies in Objective 6.1 and 7.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME), for the following reasons: • The Project will preserve and enhance a minimum of 25 percent of the native vegetation on -site. The preserve will be protected in perpetuity with a conservation. easement prohibiting future development. • Selection of preservation area is consistent with the criteria listed in Policy 6.1.1 and the preserve provides connectivity to off -site habitat to the north and east. • A habitat management and exotic vegetation. removal and maintenance plan will be required. at the time of Site Development/Construction Plan submittal. The preserve area 5 shall be required to be maintained free of Category I and II invasive exotic defined by the Florida Invasive Species Council (f.k.a. Exotic Pest Plant (EPPC)). plants as Council The requirement for submittal of appropriate environmental data pursuant to Policy has been satisfied. • Jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in Policies 6.2.1 and. 6.2.2. Agency permits will be required at the time of Site Development/Construction Plan submittal. • In accordance with CCME Policy 7.1.4, prof ect development will comply with applicable federal and/or state permitting requirements regarding listed species protection. REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Second Edition. 0 27TH AVE SUV = �: `s 1 0 '— _' , • It 29TH AV, E''SW ! ><� = r--' - -. �: �� tILu U) 3 Z =31 ST AVE SW MARKL-EY/AV,E i EVERL'O�AV',E —� 171 WASHBURN AVE' LL Juj :am LL - �w� : �w ;a J Im �r rNEWMAN'DR 1 , 7:- SABAL PALM RD c P is l IIAA At F. I ,a(I a `lr w ' o od- Ad o -V Jdl I r° �T r •-;�FF '�'' -.; ,r- f� '. 1' ,'r'� �#r' 4 .u.f ` I' 'C,r• -� .�.:C:�. �•,Jr,�i"aMv� y�. >',4110 .� •t,i++ f,� -may- SrAd 41'•• -i.• 1i • Cft - r f, -. e^ +. :t` ♦ • 1, ..1:, _ ,,`�1 •,� h �•P�>ry Y^ ! i'' j.•�J,� .�i 1•• •� j/le� +g AS Tif I k'ir -! . • �T i F♦yr i _ tl'� _ j �u y� -y I r Z_� „a+ `''� ,It •�" A If IJ '� i r hr Sql d r r 1.11 !- �. �. • i{ { r'�rly s. "�7.�� r ei♦�, I AV` . - Y•r t►'.„' �> `y'e'C �` + • it rSO yyW, _ `y dd A ►AN h::t� •� s +Zt. T ;� p 6i +"a old by , E",�.t�•r ` '► 1 lAA .' ii�. KAi � '.._`A. t r , � ft i � r1T -•f FF •,ll 3�,iys is�.,�• 9 q Ad s.' � v� }�j:� M •r� �Ay.AArd M-{/�1r � orb' '�,� •' .` `� , _ ;, "•>.1 ,� '4 Y 1 good �� [11. f.d a .- �••.I �'� - a '' r••+Ii ~ �T. mg A - 1 -..w '.yam +'" 4% r al at 0 Adif• fyAgo I jr - rY sf.. 1 4'�iok r.T ' .r v .'. r� q, �;d,I' < 4 } w r7Im 'i + ` `7',A ' V • . .i} .lam i% t iFcR • i ,s1 v M r-� ..: r�M074' '��6 1 %vg ' \ ; IL A Y 406 0 Ad woroAM 0 I T ' . ', a .k .. L j , ~ 'Lor F . J At I i L' 4d 1�13 -`i iif''No S Jt • I AFAIN s I ice:;. od- Ad Ad I Ad A !. f ,r :: t Ad i 'c '' Agreadool{;« , tom'. a 'wr/• : Y••r� rFItra e G> vrz Add ., +, .J�.� rt - I I _Sr r r. ; - t a, t • • 1«• t • + " ` ' 1" ilbl �f.. "` I a - - w, N ja . .arq� 1 7�i R ... c Y � 1.1 cI * I -g- TAI IL "Ad VIA ,i'Ift R..� i Add.. , v of r + ' r i' :>:L'Pj 3•_i y !, -9Y�"_'y III me of jfagd� a I Good gdew good Air �:., T ,7- .,•„ r•% ly4•11aw t Afta %I 0 o:' I.Itr' f~ eae":s •v - Ada WJ `d . P• r I r i• r ��ry �apl','0 -_ I 1��C3_�f{-,?.+°��j`�7I • •• �of dod,y , „/� Ylyc : D, ,.`',;.D, , dop •rt ••� r '�WAK 't. •Ad �' ifdo-T. �',� i FAA > do -�e. j`�'116 /j*}� _ Y•J IV K Ad P11 Oft- r_ li'� J,y�I r �Ad l - ' 1.D�Vj --- 10 1 1 do +'�� ij a� �G •: N, Y" C f.:, c�.�, �,s .A '.. iw o fi' FIT♦ � '!Kim.: 7 j �.' ' i rol �'« . �.?•� idt ry' ., 4. ad a 'did f.fat' 91' r 1 tY• �., • 1 • 1 �'r •• h L -• Y ,r..,� ` - Ad 4 y,b ` Ad I .. I. 0.0 14 F. yA AL < - r'Ado i I: l� r � � ' �� ` 1 I .ai �j01�:eQ��l tr�` i )$ ��'4T � � �, 4fi � "' }ram'. �} yI or � Ip7 Pir.. pi 1XIF it Moodo d dot ' Y 0 Ad� • I go AtT _ '! go ~I xd. 'f 7 i _ s Add 401I r ..,y <' 6' fit+. .+�_ r ^ r' XF dd� I AWN If I I At So A r _ 1 •"ham 9 . T'^ 4 j� � y i if•. ov f• • ,.' C- � p A A 14 redodP A, 2wl:o . r 'cam: , ' rd% wr ._ _ �• AM ; ' ' Y !��S�y64 l��` s j�•r - a ,li►- Sir A' Ad , rr . { or Ago I�ii.{_'.;,��.��' : �� - ..- AL .fi�rl� rr,•� ��' �, .•, I�l ..�'{of I A.� 'Ko , y, y t�4 Add tAs' ago IL #.J 11 � _ do MA& .. .. '. OT ' may' '� 7'. Ad .i t •:A Jog #M."f � " III f'~' r. r. -'SQr' i J• S.1 OPIL �j,pt, P`f `tf !a. o 1q y IL �• a• , i �iAN oft 0 '�."jt'ii�� p'Fli i�.. Tr ' <a•'. c. ♦. . 11 t�-A k"r. ' 's7r�" rfo y,`. {by.,.µ A IF -_,,f- o ` ��- , •;S AV 11 - :"' ,I{•' '�s•;ry%l -a�i r 'fit - :: AM �'r-,a .1t•i� do _ 1!,, -y s .&F I a AV Ad XisFI)m 1 4 a IF 11 Ago A a A;;-N a I 414'r4 a . � rig. �.Stl ,f I A 4 11 tjF aw VIA A : tl!rl, WWO Y16 f, tii�.f ,sue' I Is Ad, I VddVbkj wo le �,Kr dd, �p jl - `'t .III I 6 tS& A� I 7oAd�.L -do qa 1 JgplMf�y'-�" {tirr'% �,y. AV I '-:"'�� .'C�a" '' 114yt�,� r.. r•iJ,n�' �4+goo�, . Al I f . •.1t ' ;� f "•'. do (1, ` .'!Zi `'�Y •' -��i 'w �ySr: �'! �Y :t - .3'j� 4 yye�' '1 i "�. �• ,ice ft g j r` IF A AM od� I III, +f-. ' Add A .l �' I- A-1'.1 �i1 A '�' i�` e8r .,yd! oram . 1 7- .'C. - dogdog Ad 04*11 MITI, I :it •I{�`'No WFraid a, ITAKERjRD. ";' ' �,f+w ; NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII , Ad,` s:A. • s. r ­­AAAAAd i Ad 4 I I I Add �. i t� 1 i •� i `�% �;.,1 mod! 1 .. 'Ni do I �- 'of to ,. L '�.. 7 y ad MA isI AdIIIA y �.1�'� i i " y� ; iR �1'��'t�rf ry y %i ;�� 7a ,° :.' ��yl, r� r�1y,� I., {� ig�aftqd 3>�'0.� ,1 - �$LA i4A� I 0 }bra!JA I 4L tolp Ad fto A I ;Idg a pq ; CA t` 0 I" A Z .a�l • w �s yof ad Age 1 aa�p tAn - a ,• ~ ,.' �JV t'Sa. t r (A ` `,r It,1 ,_ r7 arJ-'�MI.�',•; • s tiytAIP'S.^aw f •'r-•Y"' �� -"rI FAA . 2w If JAI fro- AAI .w _ A�.5" �r'v.. '"�' 'SP 1. 71 s ?".! tom''i .•,•t f'r:.. - - JIddry 0 do J ��}y}r,,�6, 1 y, �P0 rF�JF'a a7rifirzuhL t+� t c.Y. x f Aft agodgm a op1t� .Kx ���� 1a1 .aI K}•y .y7' `M.r, ��r� Q „o I ,I �r add rx;wL ado I4 9•Ir a ±� M JAR .9. �!' lIr/�•'�.•Y .u4r'1'^-�k• •Y ,>• �s. �AgopvvJJ"�! +�`Tr"`j '.'f �'y �1 o jI Ad A ► �`� "IA • ;,�',+r]woo 0% s -%: ,' _�l '.4 � I1. 7gov lip iv 0 �j >sµ . �l .,, , a t � �AV 3 . '•+ k11? !tom {'TWO For r• 7r IT $ {�":'•'i N. a to It �3 �r ♦ r• .1• 2 "al IN go A A FAA to r'4 '. ♦III , ,,•aAd , .r. ,114 }�.�^-'if' \. f �. _w d� � '�• "��R �► t. =� I _Fr � door �,'rj�•}a* � r �� ' ���r�lT� .+ r � �•� .�( N (kov� 'fiJ ,�)'1 ,t , - y••� •�F3.�'' r s y,�. ••'I -� ,, rt �f • Lr'�- }^y,• 17 •4 a0l41 . ,► -.2 +•', �, � � y' ` s . r� } Ah itA �1�' ��a `JYjSd 4 j' �> �' � a , � i � o r� .S T I = Add. Ad .. 1 to Jam. A. ; itord Ago... •> r'� "' . a- K},,� Syr+�� -'J4/�ad ItVa �� yr ° # .� �! , b-.: "�'� S� s't •, ,rf` �. $;! _ > r Ai or `( I of V 16 Ad I f;ff ' ,s to ~' Potato Via - .,''', r 41`AL - , 'K''•.,• 'r- .,i� ,4 ' Al -7. .l.1, IA d r IL y� . lw•,,���' ��� V -1 A .. t -1. Food L " " .-'•l t o • � yet jr ' or �1 p •��iy ,`. ,�/y:' .lyi►: , 1 �4' ,_ �.,� j ,AI_ -•♦ Ad I �kw 4�>r�'}'t'�P'..A' � .� I WIN A, I ' I S'� •''n '•f 'R' 0o yi;p ♦TrF•,,,� /.I,. t •�,•. "eC¢I{ YF � ;f • r„ V , q' .Sep Y '_ �;�1 �y' �1 71'- .. �Ij/kL ?eT p�vr •dotodko ffrr l yb I - "'" i • _A of 116, It •,�•;A logo Ad r It r1-Is .+ f 4�-.%4eu.,o 0 Awl,rFrd•Ar � ♦ �O'ia.&yy� 1 'a� ' •+�do &.may% f(� Ford 11, aft" AL I * doo r / ' , food ,jam '. ` s: > �. + AV 1� _ ,' �'' r, 1wr .; yr r M , �, �+ t go ,, VA :.,; ,fig, . k .Iop Food ass AN c OJA .1 •'L Y + jo,"ll III N was- Jt vOF, a o r i. eyeA. f . r0 • i -v, dialso �� At I,d „ ? iad ' ]I•:T� -mil C w _ �) i, N _ .. i% I ` � rota too a ' go 'r WN ♦ - ifs I ears .f�i�► A A i .04, Xa i � • ' N•.: . !' ;1P94 � ON Add 4.wl I, A. 00 I I I I I !V .adl Aft Agal s � ; abo,s mg,' INC A 7� 1. ° � raga to y, A IS W 161 so I gof figh. 4 M OF I 9 -, *w.4,. A` - wo 4 4 4 .1 A at ;r I MY .a e� ^� 4 Im III�rFAA'If " ti- . 'Moot" - !ter%YS+� ad )Add ` .I ft 1 AV)p Alto qA do I I! 4 .-v ; X A. A so all._ It a do III 00 IV vit '•4gr� L f -; :goome J .� :t AI1, M a ft.. rd ,O • 0 iY Ir 6*1 , Ad A Ad It q y K ' Ag •A. I ♦�,.. r J a -I Voodoo 19 '4� yet{ i a f M. AM • V '' AgAddF-4 - I Adi yp . �-:r - - ,,,,� , Y..ff le I 1 illr. • X. 1f., I.1. fly J .16.•!. ' +�Ci7 iI ♦ 1 X qi� off do or ew'se4:0 AMA re So rift� p� '.dW..[� •rid# I� r+. ••�l . \ I 1 ,Zdwitir 1•a. 44 �` } F ! r •y1 i lI• Or + ►, .mati►7 UN fj7{TjAt I ft •- �/ r .1 )f It AkM �~ • lk NOW ox it s y M fs; • tp If it ' R�' .• I,,k .1 • r �ii ` If sly a sob OL Ilk ld do 11 •t� ' .fir �fiwr If IfIi" 'al A a* "If x ;w:.' r �; "�1�;p- a? ' 1 v • •;�t , •t'' •`, ''♦}-ty Lam, �(• ,•M••►ti•� .r�f��� T�.Met IV .fir• •4 c Ain Olb jr IIV� ALI ad Nk w_ ► • ♦ • ♦ • f ♦ • �� f • f • ♦ f ► ♦ f • J Q♦ If IN 40 0 Of • ► f ♦ • f•J CO • or ♦ • f ♦ • Z) ` ♦ ► • • • ► ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • +' ► ♦ f • ♦ ♦ • ♦ ► • r- ♦ ♦ ► • • • s • ► ♦ ► . • + `l If J • • • ♦ f ► ♦ • • ► ► CL f ► ► ♦ ♦ ► to • • + • • + • • f ► If + +� + ♦ • f ♦ r ► ► • rj Q ♦ • ♦ ♦ a co op ob 0 r s • `D • r + ► ► ♦- C f • • ♦ • f op 0 op PL � 1 J saIII I Wool • x r£• :., t- _Off y � iy t ♦ � • ' Y 1r- r U �r r� to r r u ♦ #LL qF *t' !'•4.�t ♦ ♦ ► • ► + RA YA sb It op op IF I� 4 PC AA Vat It A ..,?yet " ! �. f' .: { • • F �..� ,r ,4 �• � r � � �� A .. r :/` ••�f�.•r,.t. �•�tiy' If � ± Lt•�r•` =�.. '1 If IN T f, Q + } fr �1 Opt {�•. -3• jr4; ,' �. , ' i'1� �t . t ti 3 • 'i�'rf _t r j t ' /. r .• ^' I ra A r J 1Y l 1 . •} , t Y +r, „ � '!rr yL ♦ � ..y w ot it L of a Opt Lot j" Z T IF I - �.40 Is 4 "i W 3 p, '1 I j1%No IF . � Sol L � 1 J saIII I Wool • x r£• :., t- _Off y � iy t ♦ � • ' Y 1r- r U �r r� to r r u ♦ #LL qF *t' !'•4.�t ♦ ♦ ► • ► + RA YA sb It op op IF I� 4 PC AA Vat It A ..,?yet " ! �. f' .: { • • F �..� ,r ,4 �• � r � � �� A .. r :/` ••�f�.•r,.t. �•�tiy' If � ± Lt•�r•` =�.. '1 If IN T f, Q + } fr �1 Opt {�•. -3• jr4; ,' �. , ' i'1� �t . t ti 3 • 'i�'rf _t r j t ' /. r .• ^' I ra A r J 1Y l 1 . •} , t Y +r, „ � '!rr yL ♦ � ..y w ot it L of a Opt Lot j" Z T IF I - �.40 Is 4 "i W 3 p, '1 I j1%No IF . � Sol L Fee Few 41 if v OF 4 Fit 0 Jim, 6 IS ell et •� �t F� Y LL .1 Y% f. r ^' ' all IF I IF bet 0 POO .�. It iAr . of be A 04 A*t: kt� Lets 31 IF I "bWe it �, `♦bie,! ♦*Z 4 Few, • a 1 a9 Noe I I it IMF art Wi I. at ova Foot 1 %6 Feb I all r vIs Wei Al N M• rrx r~ via PI Fit .t OF .+'•. Itilk : �r ^.-sty(: {.. t41 ' 'Few x'` OF A We, 1 yl ��, p.Mj' 1, •finF .'®Y+ *,F . ; } ' w•IL tit IF OFF IF • �•. t}rbe It Fiji, 44 OFFor • ► a ;.� a ► • f i ► a a + a a� Q a ► ♦ r a a a + ♦ N♦ • + + • ♦ + ♦ IF IF at IF a ♦ ► + to at Jr ro be • a + + a ► i + ► ♦� S + ♦ + • ♦ + +1 IF It + p Flo • OF ♦ + W u ♦ f ► ♦ + ► ► P Feet ♦ • • a ♦ • + + + N c9 + + f + FIZ + + • OF IF a ► a a + ► ♦ ♦ a at+t + Q • • IF It + to + • ♦ ► f a + I ► > i a • f f ► • ♦ if • It ♦ It f p at lF • r f -♦ OF at • ♦ • + � i f • + + + + • a ♦ s \ • + ♦ at It a • ♦ a • a it + ♦ ► List ♦ + • + + nj ' ♦ + f + + + + f a VlWL :2 'a �� -•s••_ .�.ie IF P Q M u 1 Q e�i ao 0 M a ♦ • ♦ + ♦ • + i f ♦ + + ♦ • + of + + J a • • a ♦ + + • + a + ► • + + Ft to �. • "s I Moll IF bit be 0 Np lot gr-` ,,03OF �Mr r ' 3 ?OVA :► f Abu -Ali I Lot All API Wit of Fee be Wait ► a� ri, OF MI _ •. sty WiFF..'1 ;t �t'<<g.!%jr+ ` - .. f fIF POP L.� ` t411, ♦ 1� � r �► IF few - N W u CJ in r o a' 4 1 CD � JFIT o L NJL' aF •r W S 1 P •a S N �~ .. f r ♦f +; W o, Q 0% ti in ,o FIN, +� W S o• j M N t1 +1 W•*r ♦ ♦ i a ow 41140 • ♦ ► 11J .) + • + + W List • + + ♦ + + f It Q i • + + ♦ O• Q + + + + + + ♦ 4NbJ M ♦ + IF N to + a + • • + a • .o I + + + + .o + a OF + + ► ► 0 ► + + ► + a 0 + + • + • r + a + •Will • ..be f ;• ''* • !& .•.{ • •1st X '/ 0•1"0 . . } "A n �. sr; �+' 1r•.. •• n; I L teat It let I IF .. vFee. '.ty� .4 ; r, be b\Ta' - �`� 1 ^ ~6. ,''♦ 4,t We 0 ova Five I bible Well c fee -F r ♦, ,. Fee CV, ,y�, ff ���}be �-,arrrf'•*� f� .%q a': ja.r.f�`s.,�j'• Zit be 61 Ith I Fri r IF IF fie,e, New lot tS IF 4 op r' ►� P �,F "E �� `y Far • ' ? '•ry ♦. i !�••. •'�,. .. ►. ' sti ° T ?�I'. :,•d� ;r •.`} RJSOL + tpit .M '' a4 thA } - Y yt� j' sti S�, •1.•,,,'i� ` I♦Z yFAR +413W OFF I lt •tiy.(� '�►• be be ii• j ' 1 `fir m i ' t ; a+: �. i We ISO „ ' VI i bo! We 4 fit _sY�(� ♦ t/ .•. •,to v Wil GG IF, Io aliel '_+ • ♦jp,R .v� woee IF e it Ft • .yam:tel_'a v,.,';;♦i Feel a t..' rti�rr r r•: 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the Associates, Inc. on January 5, January 2022 results of the listed species survey 2020 for the Santa Barbara Whitaker conducted by Passarella RPUD (Project). The 21.97� acre Project site is located in Sections 9 and 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Appendix A). More specifically, the Project is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately 1.0 mile north of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard (Appendix B). The Project is bordered to the north by undeveloped, forested land; to the south by a stormwater management pond; to the east by low density single-family residential development; and to the west by Santa Barbara Boulevard. The Project site is comprised mainly of undeveloped, forested uplands and wetlands that have been invaded to various degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca (Melaleuca quinqueneNvia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and Australian pine (..1asuarina equisetifolia). 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW AND FIELD SURVEY METHODOLOGY A literature review and field survey were conducted to determine if the Project site was being utilized by state and/or federally listed species as identified by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern. In addition, the property was surveyed for plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) Li d the USFWS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited and for plant species that are included on the Collier County Rare and Less Rare Plants lists (Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.04.03). 2.1 Literature Review The literature review involved an examination of available information on listed species in the Project's geographical region. The literature sources reviewed included the FWCC's Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (2021); Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991); National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007); Landscape -Scale Conservation for the Florida Panther (Kautz et al. 2006); the Audubon eagle watch database of bald eagle (Hallaeetus leucocephalus) nest locations and database information from the USFWS; and the FWCC for telemetry locations of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), bald eagle, red- cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), (Mycteria ameNicana)) in Collier County. and wading bird rookeries (e.g., wood stork The FWCC, USFWS, and Audubon Eaglewatch database information is updated on a periodic basis and is current through different dates, depending on the species. The database information that was reviewed is current through the noted dates for the following species: Florida panther telemetry — June 2021; bald eagle nest locations — 2021; and red -cockaded woodpecker locations — 2021. 2.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted during daylight hours by qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects across the Project site. Transects were spaced to ensure that sufficient visual coverage of ground and flora was obtained. Approximate transect locations and spacing are shown on Appendix C. At regular intervals, the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The survey was conducted with the aid of 8x or 1 Ox power binoculars. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Literature Review According to the FWCC and Audubon Eagle Watch databases, the closest documented bald eagle nest is located approximately 2.2 miles southeast of the Project site (Appendix D). The Project is located outside of the USFWS designated 660400t buffer zone for bald eagle nests. The bald eagle is not a listed species but is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. According to the FWCC database, the closest red -cockaded woodpecker location was documented 0.89� mile northwest of the Project site (Appendix E). This location, along with the others documented west of County Road 951 (a.k.a. Collier Boulevard), are considered relic or historic locations as there are no currently known active cavity trees west of Collier Boulevard. The red -cockaded woodpecker is a state and federally listed endangered species. According to the FWCC database, the Project falls within the core foraging area (CFA) of one recorded wood stork colony (Appendix F). Colony No. 619018 is located approximately 17.9 miles northeast of the Project site. The wetlands on the Project site provide limited foraging potential for wood storks due to their dense canopy and exotic species coverage. The wood stork is a state and federally listed threatened species. No Florida panther telemetry is located on -site (Appendix D), and the Project is located outside of the USFWS Florida panther Primary and Secondary Zones (Appendix G). The Florida panther is a state and federally endangered species. The Project site is located within the USFWS Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floNidanus) consultation area (Appendix H). The Florida bonneted bat is a state and federally listed endangered species. 3.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted on January survey were as follows: mostly cloudy skies ranged from the mid-60s to mid-70s. 5, 2022. Weather with light winds, conditions during the and temperatures that No listed. wildlife species were documented on -site during the listed species survey. Stiff -leaved wild penes (Tillandsia fasciculata), inflated wild penes (Tzllandsia balbisiana), and butterfly orchids (Encycha tampensis) were documented scattered throughout the Project limits. The FDACS lists the stiff -leaved wild pine as endangered, the inflated wild pine as threatened, and the butterfly orchid as commercially exploited. Stiff -leaved wild pine, inflated wild pine, and butterfly orchid are included on the "Less Rare Plant" list per the Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03. Although the plants are protected at the state and local levels of government, they are rather ubiquitous to Southwest Florida. None of the plant species observed are federally listed. 4.0 SUMMARY The literature search and review of agency databases found no documented occurrences for listed species on the Proj ect site. The Proj ect site is not located within the vicinity of an active bald eagle nest and is located within one documented wood stork colony CFA. The Project site is located within the USFWS consultation area for the Florida bonneted bat. A field survey for listed species was conducted. on January 5, 2022. No listed wildlife species were documented on -site during the survey. Scattered occurrences of stiff -leaved wild. pines, inflated wild pines, and butterfly orchids were documented throughout the Project limits. 5.0 REFERENCES Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2021. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. Official Lists, Bureau of Non -Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. autz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor K, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough`? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 118-133 Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical R chniceport No. 10. FGm lorida ae anresat d Fh Wer Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. N C c c c c a 1 i c wLor-h - "& r_ILL I i ,."fir t • YFI " i , III I I OFF \ON' 1 ��- E '�. •I *7 fwj 4 �' ad - "40"�;G- ft Gooll 4 ?4 {1oft -W . al id , • d 1 ILL ,# `? •` 11 t'Ad I +, 5 :Xe'L .r ; - ad-. �} ( W 1 yyt ijt7� .f°` S "' IL ". r + 'Lt G t. E . II 't P ll �7e '+� .. L. %,•,,, ! ,' 'a A IF Vs. ,?� •Y t V,to Ad ol 4 did IL OF &J, Da 11 Y:dog+� • a Goo ; ,yi�low UpAilload -law It It c ' 71 r,i+:„- or I "ice h� Mf�i r tt,, Alm _ T d•: } I LUFF M r, _ `� tt . `=' I' mr;Is,. Fr' � r SY ' � L a 1.I A �. , �ep ILI f yy ,� . + to "It IF •wo � M♦ppv UP I 7 r' . a IF a.At It r ! III ill III to' Pe A+I16 04 IftC'f" �1�mill ��! q bf�5 is AV Vol i- val 11 41 -ill war' ,- 0 Am^ y 4 " t - wood I t - - - J rUs �Flows w : I+J /�� jam' f y..L,..44 y�-�f' , • •t * 7T ���4� PS I+ + ';, fm 7 1t _ -. •� . •lam i{_ ^'1 IF III r M -�. I • r • •a' '� IR�j ; I �. IF ;A0 ,. , _ t b VFW�i -�. 1 I 'C.r` r•,: m f yY,�>� r AV 0 I�,t ` r W ,I. ,. + :•`s. W •dIr '•� . ,! pI,�ILL t �• � � f It•�+r"r yIF I f �' .. , iitr :' � u • � , )O mt` •�? ; � -y01 • - .Y ..fir •3:� Ado,� �-j'��r4. r tir i • . �+� '_�. ,�, x � F..._ � : , . o- .� Ir IF '�Y fir• �' Vol a to 40 10 IF �� �_r' . ter W !. st i' iY } V . �'Y7' �t } , r1S v t' T'm a �yi1 -w: a , 'sf F it s y f+�r gry _ $+ r - cb eft ill �AAk I..tom 4 , 4«. r'3' ',L .`�gf r Yi• `" �p ♦ - • Ao -.tR Syr Y r ~ �,: `•'. Old a •,Ad A ��I - y ]• .. j :A , p -•r +f. ' �.. 1,1 5.� -• is ? h b -7 ,'y> r �, f • �`v IV . _.Ti'_ �'y »^ �ri�• ''m }•�� 'Tsw,�, � %,' ^�:.r �t le .t .a.+•. y,. r, q i,C�t +Y y ., x i->Ad I it415. ,y�wit�:�. i. '`�ydal..�- y�.� IF _ �m'�t] J •+"' - t" �';}' i* .•,,,,ixL pwd I •LUJIF do 'T 3' s .r. .fi' "•4 �' IF j alf7 7: I ` `t ` {m t • i' I•,:, ",� or 7 y + �11 t l : ' �Ad 'i �,p r AM I Ass as OFFIG ". 11,r fit.,., sof7• i'SY,,,��. py ::•., • .� p � } ' ;"�yV!'.� •i'�1'. 'h�•!4 ,.I. , .i',: * - �{� ; FF c } I Up „� r :A,F ,gym ,�, R: I C Is - f A } .-�yrt• al gJ ._ I W, ;i7► -.i d- - �� �' ,/�Ar : y- G.f .��11� .I7,., I r' J, - f�or . ''•i. Y •Imp r OPAPq,, • t •tm sr ''ti:" r� ;l 4: , IF T • '�"�' }. ySN �- •, + :� s. ' I' .. food { u. !ks r�; 4 *1 r � jnM', .pit r,` �.i 4 as rj ��" � ,i L, r-.` .s; "� .:.'T. �i"i. �}8•-tl •f x.- t•` LOU 4�•+:' j '-0W _ do qql • �}y '�^'., '�•�.•_. �74Uold a ,tl .. jf`V r_ >IV. t ri-n� � Qt"-�: t 0 It tC• tJ•� .7 't� At µ - , •. y �t l OF 'd�y� t IP '�. "1►+:I-it MLO ...y. �fy �'4 •.. 'y�� •.'t{4` T y`.X I �d y1 '.Cr ,w +3 � 7 poill �� � .r •, i ,jt ► s i ��r ` r+yY- r7 i�t nib i. �'m°' `-. ' pit Ulf-6 .1�1 1 ./, I r0ld IF ILL Up id � �• �� 1'd 4 •• . jh � •I . m -► + - ,/f_ .t1 i -•W ,,; t_,.-, +1111.-ti fld-.11,. IT ,z `�ji y� TFdo 1 _ 7r r� ` V a , ow 'r'- ew' III P am •4WLT.k Jzjf, 6, I i�f, jk.) yb R�Up a �X .� , vell Us Oi _�'^` y .ir} �1�'_�t.•44 III It � it , If do 49 war I; 0 dow, I I A q;?i:G f I a dr, VOL 1''v t " a .r toddifto►a.y� 4 ^' r �/y y - 1� 4, 41 ! y +. 6 , '" . ,• �Y�} M A ad ' s •3( � . +i rxTs t �'ow ,► :i. ' : s �* J fa ��ayppAd I •, al lod °yri M r• !kow L �Rrr mod, : ILL •,'� , -�� Sf qff ��}(� of Vy r".f' 4 y� p�Up al v9-Aldi Go ;, • �m ,• +t• . .r-. F "` "dowj V +V `T1 w i "e • j •a - -!'� a ; rc Al'.T�' ,•I� - •J •� i fit:. ► ti +C' ' a 7 .� c yt f y1, ''� 6" �:4 As?i y m t . is ' ' t Fifw`a ktr � •' Or do , - J y7k9 ",�•� y s t i i j. - ' " Y:.GO ' • - v ° '... •F wor t`..::� II * 0 t �. ,r `. _ .BT-- ^•t + _ _ ,a ' y-.'t'n!" "rAr e'y�Jn�WldwA •v., ••' 'y./C_ '"1� T lif ��` _ ; ,Y`,f�i'• � 7� ,y . .,q• It 1 , Y 1' •r m. ! __ j �+ i �.. -;Ldl `� �'. . a� IF I • .. '. �+`• - ' ' • 4 1 t •�I tjrm! It I V. 1 4:"GooALI I IF 4A . i". .M %ft �„ +-�t .-. J r..- '} • .• %&^ • "41.� ;'a. IF A If •J',/ Q ', iI, + 1jr. .. •r.1,C` yAl t' `t. 9'' t III 4; "y At, Up I 11 } f �rY . -' 7�00 .3 s'ya �-0► .60 iJ I ,.,emu, �08w al L LIC�� �f:..; ,y: c' s fts, Or�� AiI Yl.�' 4j ;d~ ♦ m • �T -� r� ii .7. r.. >r� 11, v FI Us " ,�,tj' ,�1 , . r.��•��•• �`� v ,,,�,� ,•yAM. .• j }III�'-�• y ;j -�> { ft,_ I� �'f" • . ♦K y �- r y. , .� rY'�'• �ti OF ., `►li, "+ , �r• i 'C;�a.t 1. 0�✓:: .r-;�f -`� {'` =k •'..t�jj�� N ,t ��,•��.. •t i -,Z �.y' •■,} rr_��[�' t- `T �'f J! V '.. f."IF to low p•rdVOL � 1 ary V1 V 1:;t t4 Al ram~ -?�yam. LIFIF .arr `: ..`%� .j Us = AL 0 I ti?Ito. ;++yy� _V , t _ m: 4 all �,( ifl'-`•��'♦ "7tMd, Go ay��1,�"ALL +id l �� {tom Y. a..,dir>�.%.t ir' aftiN• rad so _9 a+•k Ldd�7 <+ �,•+ ' "I at ' 10 %.l*W%4 % _ '&•rI e�t, Yr� - _ 6. 'Xill* 0 � .o, som r h,ji+' �'71 Y � � � �`=�AM ;yi4. m- .�''0 al = 11 " -�ob f 0 UP Los -T '.m Y �; _ ' xl jnV-F �1n y '+ ILLIF.�. r `'A :: ; _ S Id.4 ftimIF F .� �`. Y` .�yl `G Y k�F+ ,a r ►isir , - j�y j tL ! t7G �,,ALL -y .q'. - A7•.,l� ., + l t,{w , ,%,i•. < Y 'j "4• +�• , FF - .ti iF�'l.,_ti•� •tom T K a• - tP if '�'' F 4 r4-r !' Y..ao 1. r �'- • �.Q�jyo 4 f I � s '�_'1 _ s F. I ft + ; Italia,w�' 'j ► ad f►t� `_ ' lr ,*FF Y �j • ti', " �a ,r'AL =t ! it Wr Fl,.' F F III ��,a = y : .�' I I i � III. ,#r`�t :"=trf -..;, ..+' ' Id `t;- .J ram. i_iO..,t y.'!� •t ^'�.fi C:- ;'.'�.°;? ,floarit �Vpft ie Ill ems . � �+ � 41 as "got7� low, � s+-•va `IO yal ' 7{: � 4� i -•„ - • • • �- P. �' W At +• 40 1'+ ,' `m�g,. '_^gp 46 • 1 1poodo }r '-(jam -ealmo I"A IV -.4, f Up did }- a I oll•j i • x <• ,.yam Tay - .- y `, /' •' '� �r '•J- "� -UP A tc �+ty Ngood I W�•,t I11 r• ��Foor ,. t - =,IN tt r+°�- y 'c•. X y ": .T••-at 0 FF. 1. PULL 4� lot:64,04r4 V we 41i. IF V ;O%f' 0 I � I A I C I is � �, 'fi` Up 1 + t t�I oAd sm OIL + R +f ft As • .:.t+t f s g# %" ti C-.�' ,;:.r,, r► _ rj ,,, ;. •fit y`t VOL ,..Aft, `�.t�� ��.1' • ] d T � FPF- I` s . or .� ic,•.�,..Sw t6 OF,f :'?fir"� '' r - ` ;'�'''�t� t� "�jr�i:`.' r'� ' i1w +!ILL .-xi .v ''y' I ;r IL U. ad ;p I fix. 5r' rif �lFs~ f".. I. Oka& �r7,Y.IF FF a�AI%`' ril rr' �r do ' ,, • o'. ;, '.�. r� +. ,.1 . -t. •, "� I& III ,r. to a••-�. ,�" .Iir I "ar , .r- �all am. I.,0 de,,���� .+ 'r Val p tdo rt y2 ''-i" _ •�:, 4 4 ;. At #y 0 OF �! ; did ,_ad FF >. . k ry ,% 1 p_ON •a ►' • r:r 1epRCd AV Vol I �,, ;-Id •• yti .'' +R 4 Up `addem •tjor�' �, a �r V y I.g , ¢.• j r NO •��7T" r �. .4 I .d Y' y ? 't IF f / + � ,l�i�t�g10 iiC . e'� Jt ,$ri. ,y �,�i '0. �i � i r � Ad t t-" I, . + y1�r. ���Fi. + 'a` _ � y"�'� F offir A, zt Id -Rt0' a irC7'.j�A' '♦ 1 dow . FULL Or Ar IV Firod OF Its- t� < lir wt' - ii/± t. �.'°4V ". N •• ,vr r * k - ' J �••,• - # - •7 wr 1 v' tj111 / ' pi .Y • t - p 1 ., � +}fc �.L ..J IFF :, r' Y r ,� � f ""+ Y - µ �jF 'Ami } `* � >al .•l �Y " V7�t,, •• ,,_r " +F •�10 It I `j1 ' .tr . t .'fry `'' . LL OF .''FA. `"'r` of 4 OF IW�f lit PLIL y. •+`S ?:R. Y.ad" .J't` 'b1 v Ml• •• _ l•i] `✓+.� ,.Awar ~old'i' `'�' .S' s AIL VI Aff 0 ow p I *Up IN I k♦ ate+!' t _ t h! i*' `'�f?•"'�Or ., WHITAKERIRD '� rNGINGO (�» . PVIV" :1 f N t or IWOMMM y .� , a. ��',I to E i z'- ACS v . •GY i _ f i ic. +y�V, ow''�•Y3 Ad I+', .. ! - " A0 VOL If I y ✓wit ' mr. •e. ,� .9 'i4 ''' yE. �^'1� Y•'' �j T••1 �y �'� a Ad tUp ''er" - •�(_ ��.-t14 lift tl to OF I 1 Ilk ol So 'Y.. imi>: I•'..C•it 11 `7-i A s '' .V •li Vit r, y, . �•. `a C . i 3. III , ��y,,# t77, y •(r�� .i r,���PslrIi T 37� �+ a'' +l x 6 y+ , - AL O `ap; %'fit► r 'ry' • . .: Tri4 ,w •r� it I+,trY VA7 4 4 a I I � 4 t-its +' VIA 1 %0* i `t`t £ .+ - +�� it04 .. _ y xt 11,r ,I� 'fit •' ,~T ♦- • _ �, ��yjy.. Up 6* 1 ad GO of ryyjj�� .a'^/ '' 6 e,{�' + tom• Art l� t'04 4 - mmik* 1� 'YW jv R. •V� U t_ r r . . r' _ ,1 �S 'J a ,F. ' Y 1 Q.�yy t,'• T'". 7 _rK�i4 1y''�,-} ) Y,%• r F 4 �: i,p I ` - .. ]Mr r • .%JJJJJJ••••MM, ����'''" Y �y_ly,.�,, Ad )� + ,. 7("il , �I',•V V. r ' VAL it or. 4 .' .didi. j, I fp . 1 :yy.,,.jIt _ Lot,Q' f y'GI ! . c' i� 0I +.] ; t J!"o -3 ems � y Is '•, pv ��, le ` I I s � rY a t�` ra Yt � Sa 7 a • 'I rd�A'+ • � ' Iti tr ow 110 It AN:. lot )a Is I I, UL 0 war - �,;f.�.Ct` x'Ltr �•''f®.+,t�`-°v All, Up •0 IF st Ifv LF,,r10 ,� ?i'�i �:-3t'• '`t�G6'r` .`s,' ; ; , - r- 1.yA�yl�'1fi07 'S' �" �r w[. • W hy,U.ZV it* Ii ; .� �t�T' 1 r. „`,' at •`[ •.. , `!� t,, ' # y1•'�r � o � ,�:n,�,}�°�` - iiii _ f. - � ':..• •' - vy_ .Oft, IUp I do , IMM,v 3if '� L 6, fk,•v .dds, ` '�' •> - t-� ,. � tl .lS�rM +,lid ., Ir AV 44ff4A7ft- do ,A Fit 'W: , IC �At� aer ; , W". IL i1AL `.- �i ate, • • 'IF to I 14 .y, � t � '� it; I •�9�p = "• ..Y. ity*-,,� ,� '7fif• "� it t Y'.'a,. ,'t3�e r 1 $ . v ?� {�,,, it 9y - ri.l - y • Tt'. r>+ 6 Lot Ar L 0 , - - A 014 , * 0 a I t4 - It I Is I IF I r or j. y '.tiN iy r0 to1 K. �' f►� ,y�was YtS� .^.r�ysad ys,+.q ;~.M, i..s 'Ga L j � kV A f �. It a .: di �vR�7�as I �p�yT+ i t ♦' •g;i�'%y„"ire`' i�i"iial t j� : Up 4 tiAds y FIVA dial ,, 310 a F y ,� , .,- s �` t • •ir t r 1'=ice .r�r m* Vt •. �' fir., ' t 7!t _=t.ad I r . - LOP + ' 1.�:tt v, 1_ �ff q 4:.�"' i 11G 6,_V 'S4 SOP j ot , A. �'+�a ` • 4, !r "r I.. 00000 I f I wad n 11 i f ` ,.a# . Vie. d -' i ''i r £. rR .R _ e a - r.fr +�.1all, •y ♦try �r .a��.'we ti.}.f.� 1 ' i ♦: r� '10 ifs 1 at ltf1 r•� ��, ,.via J La y' T �,y •\ - Fk `' 'a^} No 'R .rt :Im I . AW JIMMONOW"71 ma" ri N t4i a 4 1 • ..It Mail? arm • r . w Ile Or �• i �• IF .�� ••�•� .�a•� •.mil a✓� ��- �tr �• !�': y� •tr Mot 'r -.al " ql�aj` -1�'i _Ni I1T- r �?�F r> ? .. • 'r• / * " a +.1• >. 11 . A ' •' 11 >'► , t ,�L /F� .�i+. _ j •r J .�• r r i .r F.� w► y � �► ar�"'firIt " ii '� - 1' x• .r•rril �.r. �r �.. �..r. �� �� err.. •rrr� • .�� ' s. } 2- a. _S y., r:f. .lIt am .� IMP I It Job I, ML 00 It ame i" w _ r # `:r = • •, a ,;,• .,•tom:; ;jt1 Or tat, r opoly ` + ay * t .._ Rt .I% • ����r- • ti • I. .b1 ' • v- Or -, - , .. �,1i r 40 ,� ;a IF AWN It ir all (pact am 0I .... i.. Wit'!' �...� �..•-I .�.. �...�• . +....w �� �..,.,•, • • .�..�. • • -' 3 '� '"^w'i1Ru.'""g"•t-'1R- •„fir'• '�i ., �• 1 - - �.. ' A ,r `� a. �- hit t�,.� ..•tdo IS m" Yw� 'p • .� a �' - '•y► , 1 r' mi ,wl,w ••�� �.� • i ' _ , r �e 1�- ^.. r�s.- . ..mow. ��i -nr t JL �f 1 1 � e IF � ~ J. r r #*M I• ; � A a to f i` s' f 40 mar ¢ r rAL 400 E jarr;od •� 1 , 111110000101111 rIL ram' .• f Sitar w Jodi maw foe ' /• -' akam e mat%,� fi t !! ,� i' 14 y, r. �� =a •; a ,`} iR s� d me ti� �� �� .�� �� .ram•. __ • Sri ..,ft A %!kj, : �S .I ArrA AND•!T•.i�/ if �F . • e �-- '� INT frA1"wi. r_W4AJfItO. r It4*err IFLNr It M►" F - t r • ➢ . o ' ♦� '� ' •' • •'� ,ram 7 rw' •�_f f aa rA or 1 ay' fAr s r i Tr irk /�': it ,:va . �..+. .n.,�r .. •ten �� �� .r�r as v- �[• , •�+• . • : - ,. o motr o IMft ...�. r_ �... .ate .,a. .,t•r.. •a..r . m ' M R • iY .t j r,;w, War Icy Iw ap CII r`+1 111 fo I a WI! It i". Lo Ilk "al ar to 'At :t top /ISO 9'F 1 as a z O U O � Z � O F— W H W Q Q W W ~_ UO W IL Z J pa W c~n s w W F- 0 W z Q Z J .W_I Q Q Q CD CL m Q Q U Q W p O p U W m LL. Cy is F"I U i �t1I W z Y Z O o — r Wz O N U U r Q FAO CAW O U W Q�< Um IN ALL W W U W Q w N W � J w(n < W U W U �QF-W M zaa? wCL Z ~ o G) o W o F- >- N o 0 (n r _ O QOQz WO~ OLL L C// ONN wuz pLLJ ON o W W T /� U) LL W� 1h o�w Vj W W WC) ~W� YC0W m w �i W ~wz a: U) U W Z U W W H (D00_W ZOO two_ oz WLLU)� 0.�Q w�� C�7 • �� a • - � .r �, • � oaf a, a � a� • a • • as a. •` a � a � a' • a • 04w 046a • • a • I � • a �. a � � • !' a a � a �a a ya? a a• a, •�•� a • •a •• a • •• • as • • a. • a s • a as • a a a • �� as !� • aa,aa a 46 a a as • a' as �a • a a a a a ? a . a a' • a as a 4 a a' a a N N a � �. •� a. a ataa s i a� a a •! a s aaa a a• w N w N w ���' �'ems,' r\-f � .r ¢ a a a s a a • a s a s a a a a �> a a a a 44' a a a© a. aaa a. a, a a a �, a a a a i a;a �11, a aa, as a' a OWa a �! as a aa' as a 41 a a� a a a a a-. a* ita• a a s a a a a a a s a a, a B f' a a aaa a {� a P4 C] a' a• a a �a �a, �i �a� aaas a �a , a' a a afa! 6 a a aa �+ i aea a s a as va a s ap�� aa� a0 �Q aaiaa a a 00 !a 6 ale, aha ' �� a %a of O'a a�0 l� aa a Cwa 0)� a a a s a 04 a a a a a a a a11' a a s a' �'a a a' a, a � a �S 0a a a F� a a m a0 Is a a a 4) aaa a v aaa a a ? Y a t %t% a a a a a� as aa' a a /a f, a s 41 a Offa a s a as f a m a® a s a a a it a is a a, %, a a a a s aaa a a a s a a. a •a �a a a. a a 41 a a ,, a as �a a a s ilea a a a � a' a aif' a ff a a D F� W, ' a a to a •LE an�e V�Va�Ve y1Nys ___ Y U O Q W a a a, a Z a' a a Cn a W a J Y 0.....M] NNV9 k1Nnoo d p H Q � a 0 0Ole �a rTl a o -f O LL Q - LIVINGSTON RD BLVD- -- '�-+ ONI�n(1d�123Od2AIV ....................... ., I 1......................... .......i.._ {Q 3?AOHSJ\V8 Ur)) n - �IAV-A31S� GOODLETTE FRANK"R 2cy ..............................._...._ _ _ a 0 a • • • • a a WV I2:99:6 � ZZOZOXW'dV(AJ-NOIlV00�-S31J3d$-Q-XI4N3dd�J\S3af101�\$$�-AlNf10�-a311�0�\IZOZ\SI`J\969SOOOIZ\IZOZ\ r Gulf of Mexico LEGEND :: ::::::::::::O :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::E.:::440a4a:0aA:0::4a4a4404::A:4a4 .. •• Id •• 1 a I 1 1. . •. a a I I I•• • I• • I I••. I. I I• I I a I• I I• I I• 1 10 I• 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I y• : ' : : : ' 2 ' : ' : : : : • ' : I ' : I I : • : : '% • : : : : ' 2 I I ' • : : ' • • : : ' ' ' ' ' : ' : : I : : : : ' : ' : : ' : : • : : : 1 1 ' : : : ' : ' : :I: : I : : : : I , 44::4::4::4:::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I.::::::::::00a60a::::::a::::•'•::::::: `v 7 N 1 •51i Y.Li Lil i•ir Iw r • �r1.�1wt low 1• �•� � �� v� r.�� r• 1� � � • .•• •••.•..•..•... • •. •.. ••• .I. • a •••••• ::4a::a44444::4:::::::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::. .•••••••••••••••••...••••.••.••.....•..•........................•.....•...••.••••..••.•.,.••.••.•••. .......•........•...•....••.......•...•....••.••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. •••i••••••.••••. ::::4a4aa4:::::404a:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Ir a90::::;:::::::::::::::•i•::::::::::Aa S •.....••....••....•..••......•..••.•...•....•..••..•••..•....••.•..••••••••••••••••..:I:•••••.•••••. ::::::::•:•::aaa0aa::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::: :a::a:008a00:a::•a4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::4I044004a440::::::04 Miles ..........•.••.•...•..........•..•..••.•....••••••.•.•••...•.••.•.••.•••••I••••••••••.•;•I••••.••.••.••.•. •.•••.••.••.••.••.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•............•.•••••..•...•.•.•.••..•.••.••....•;•.•••......•...•••• 1 . • I . I . • . I . • • I • I I I , • I . • • • • • I , • I . I • • • • I I • I • , I • • I . I I I • I • . I • • . I I,I I I I . . • • • , • I I . .....••.•.•......•........•......•.•••...••••••••••••••••••••I••. •. ..••••I•••••••..••...•••..... --- - I-------- — ......:: ::.....:—�--'-- .. . ------------------------ :::::::` :at:::::� :::::::::::::00ga0a.�;::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::aa::IN:::::::0a00a6:::::::: ..•..•. i a 0 0 4 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 40 0 0 No O 6 0 0 0 0 V 0 a 0 O % Im IF 0 0 9 v & 1? 0 0 0 a w a do 0 & a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 a a •••••••••••...•..•.••.••.•••.••.•::...•..••.••.••.•..•..•.••.••..••I•••••••.•••I•••••••.••••••••••••••••. Ip ....... ....•.••.••.••.•••.•.•.•••••••...:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1.••••.•.••....••.•••••.••• ••••04 .I..... ••••••• .'••••'•••••••.••••••j••.•.••..•....••..•..•...•.......•.••..•....•.•••.•••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••. ::::::&9::::::11 I:I::0&•::::::*It I::::::::::::0:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::4ava4"::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•••. Ar ::::::0a:::::::::I:::00a0&o::::::::::::::0p:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::404004::::::... • : : ::: III 0 :i: ::: : ::: : : : : : : : : : : : ::: : . : . . :: :: . .: •'1• : .::: :: : :: ::: : :: : ::. : : . : ::: A 4 ::::: : : :::::::::::::: : : : :::: : ::::: : : : ::: ::::: : . . : : : : : ::: ::::: : : : : : : : : : . • ..•.....•....••..•............................................................••.•........•.....•._......•.••...........•..•..•.•.••••••.••.......•.... :•.•••.••.•.••.•..•.•::•••••••.••.•••••••••:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••..•..•.....•....•..•...•.••....••.....••••.••.•..••.•..••.••.••.•••••. ..•....................................................................................•.•._•..•..•.......•....•...••..•.......•..•..••.••.••....•. .....•..............4_....................•...•..•....••.............•..............•.................................................•....••..•.••.. ...••.•..•............•...•.....•........•..........•..............................................•...................•..•..••....•.....•..•..••.••_ ::::::::::::::::::: :::::a4a044 or ::: —::::::®:::::::::::::::...-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::nftIII ::::::::SASS:::::::: ....•.............. ••••••••••••••..•........•::•..•...........:f.........................•..............•.......••.•........•..•..•••••.••••. No I • . • • I • . • I • I • • 1 • . • • I • • I 1 • I • v I I 1 • • • 1 I . • 1 1 • I • • 1 • I • • , . I I • . . • • • 1 . I . • . I . I . • . . • I . I I • • I • • I I I . • • 1 • • I • • • • , • I • I 1 . • . 1 . ::::::::::::::::::: v: .0::::::::::::®::::®::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: III _ d:%do440 ::::::::::Ift• No :40&4to 4••.•::::::::::::::::::::::::....::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::a4Oa40:::::::::::: :::::::::aaa%%a:::® to %a4%a%::::®::::...: "dV"4... .....................::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::0aaa40::::::::: ...........•.•.....•..•.:F:•.•••.....••..•.....•.....•...••.•........_................................................•.. • • J_J 1 • • .-1_l_t_ l_}..1..4A'A III .1.A.,1_1_.1_l.l_.1-1_l__I.t -.-I • I • • • • • • • I I • • • • • • • • I I • • • • • • • • • I • I • • • • • I • • r • • • • • • I I No --- ' ' ' I ' : ' ' t t • I t ' I 1 . 1 1 •' 1 : M I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I • • : • • • • • • I • • % • • : : • : • • . ; I • I • • No 0 IF • • I • I • • • • • ' 1 I . • • • I • • I ' I 1 ' • I I I I t I I . . • . • • . ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PROJECT LOCATION ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: NO :::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: II `1 . .......•........... .........•..•...........•...........•........ .....•..•..•.............. \'�•:::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::'::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::04&444:::'::44 " ::::::::::':::::0a00 ::::049009:::::::::::::::: It .\. •. A ..�O\:••.•••••....... ®..•.•...........•....••..•.•..•..•....•...............••..•.......••.••.••••••• ••••••••••••••••••...•••:. No V No S,••••••••••••I•No '••.••••....•...•.••..•....••....•....•....•..•...•....•.•..•.•...•..••.•..••..•.•. •••...•••••••••••••••••••. At I 'i1.' I • I I • • . . . I • . I • • I • • • • I , . • . . , . . . . . • • . I I I . . I I . • . . • . . . . • • • • . • • • • . • • I • • • I • I I • • I . pit :`:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: 41• a::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::00&0V0a000Va::::::::::::::::::: at 0 :::=::a4aa40:::::::::::::: •:::::''t••:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::0aaaaw:::::::::::: •::::::a0paa0aap*&aaapa60a0 to 1) L ^IfJV �� ••••••&Nom4a•.•I.••••...•.••...••••.•.•.•...••...••..•..r..•....•..••..•.••.••.•..••.•.. .......••.•••••.•••••.••••. Y ~ S '.� . •%7�. . • . . . . • . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . • • • . . . . • . • . . . . . • . • • . • . . • • • • . . • • . . . • • • • • . • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • took \' 10 III NI�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::: 0d0:a:a4aa:::a:aA:a4044Q4A \ •" INNV� v NNII •:• " I. 1. 1 1: •; ' I . I,.. I. I I I I t I I t. I I I I. I I. I. / I I I I I 1 I I I I I . I I I I I 1 I: :. I 1 1 I I / I I I I I . I I I 11 I I I. 1 I: 1• # I` I` (� Y I •'• "'••:••;^� :•:'''• I.• I■• I• I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 " I I I. 1 v• t I. 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1/ I I I 1 I I I I 1 I• I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1• I 1 I 1 I I I I I• 1/ I ' `. { � 1 S t ' • • . • • • . • • • •� • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . . • . . I . . • . . • • • • • . . . . . . . . . • . . I . . • . . . . . . • . . . • • . . . •S L �' tONI It 0 4 It No 4 SANTA BARBARA WHITAKER RPUD RCW LOCATION Q RCW CONSULTAT ION AREA r, i` % ��� ,,I .-� - ::::.:::::::: *�• • SASS � ::::::::::::::.::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: + : : �..�---',�` • SASS::... _:_ __� :.. ..... • .................. ......................... . •�� � y ��-�'r`�`-�'�L •�./' I �_:.:: � ::: • • •.::::::::::::: � SASS::: � SASS: � � :::::::: ::::::::::: � : � : � :: : 5 � .�t•�.,,�LY,fWr'1 G`•Q����`" . 1 .. 1 1 • 1 ,_•-::-� �...,�... I I .. .. I : I .. . • I , I .. ' V � � � 1 . I 1 I • . all 1 1 . 1 . . . . . I : I . . 04 I I . I . . . . . . . . . .[ . , grom �� '( j III � ,�`IN :•40:a:44 ::: •.:::::4:Aa:0::::: SASS:':::::a:04a': �',`� +, +�C�n.f-� w•.C� SASS::: :: ::: :::^.1::: ::: ::: ' :: : ::: :: ::: ::: ::: SASS . LLL S 5 : "t.,,� . . c6:� Notto a % o" % NO c Q NNI 0 � f % ti�l i1. C S �a. �)\ r s� �r rNo � '' a a 4& 4 4 0 4 4: S ASS : a a 0 0 a w• too •Y • 0 O V 0 V 0 :: : NOTES: ! a ow � . °j1h ft \',Is�4 i �F '�k yjb e at � Na"'1 ::SASS:::. : ::::" IN 0 ::.; :SASS u at NO N s �a air � �-� ���\ t4, ... • . • • .. • . • •�•. • • as ,aam"ItIoNto RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER, LOCATION IS �� � ,`� ,� T;. ��! .. ; ::: :: ::: ; :0 a IN IA -ERE .ACQUIRED FROM THE FWCC ON C r A SEPTEMBEP 2021. 5 � a_c - � A}20 �'�" - y-l' •'SASS::•::a0 1 I"I l�Lw� Na % .': ) ,tow r- 7 V sh OF i vf!�P` : : : : : : : : RED -COCKADED �rI00DPECKER�� ,���11 �r, �,� ���' rf� CONSULTATION AREA WAS ACQUIRED ma`s r, a ;, s ,, A 11 rh ' . OM THE USF��1S ON SE TEMB R 2021. �l"� l 1 � � ! �4 ' -a 4%7 ;v �f f�`— FR P E���_at > ��1``,` �� ` ±^�7 �, Wit` � It 1 "No�. IN 4 r .� x APPENDIX E. RCW CONSULTATION AREA WITH LOCATIONS SANTA BARBARA WHITAKER RPUD DRAWN BY P.F., R.F. REVISED DATE 01/11/22 OI/11/22 DATE PASSARELLA ��,:-I X 1) U) w_ � z tr (D U) w Jo Q Q U � 1 a z z Q W w Z < Q W J Q o m w w Q o 0o p U z O w Oa\ O _ U; 0 M C) �7 co 1 S 4 ((, N W i Y i l CIS SIV3)aI dWVO or z w GPO 1 co t a a n�9 O 0 n�9 "I"ID9 O V p w U)O a� d C bpar SUN ,S4F11NaB- L,U.D E RD� GUNNERY at Q > zp J co � LLJ wOU LLI � J Q THE ELINE AVE 40 w a. J z > �6 Q Q r� n ZL J O r-- Y m U)Md 02�1�W--J1 z O J i �]I}iNIMnf �2 'l E OAKS PKWY dp , .. Q �O wrwaa at JG' J J U L\v `NGS-�O�l RD 1 S ti VANDERBILT DR p � p a z w w O r Q p o 0 CL Q m O � � O w QAIRPORT -PULLING RD -fa8 �INV21J 7 Wd SZ LS 6 N7 ZZOZ/71/I - aXW W9 81 aNd—S31a3�00a—�a01$—OOOM—�—XI4N3ddrJ\S3anJl�\$$1 xtNno�—a�i��o�\IZOZ\S19\969����IZ\IZOZ\ f c Gutf PROJECT LOCATION M@XICO a- n�,%% � 3 LEGEND SANTA BARBARA WHITAKER RPUD PANTHER FOCUS AREA FLORIDA PANTHER ZONES 0 PRIMARY ZONE 0 SECONDARY ZONE N NOTES dj �z=`Lid- � �� ,} ti�r--�.--�� ••�-'�, ��-t`! `'�G DRAWN BY DATE P.F., R.F. 01/11/22 APPENDIX G. PANTHER ZONES WITH PANTHER FOCUS AREA REVIEWED BY DATE SANTA BARBARA WHITAKER RPUD B.B. 01/11/22 REVISED DATE PANTHER FOCUS AREA WAS ACQUIRED FROM THE USFWS FTP SITE MARCH 2O07. PANTHER ZONES WERE ACQUIRED FROM THE USFWS WEBSITE ON SEPTEMBER 2021 AND ARE CURRENT TO 2017, 77 a ac I O I I u < 2 F F `c L a a LL 3 oo ft �:4....� :::::: : : : :: :: :: I : :Ll� :::::: . :. :. :. : . :: :. :. :. : . :. :. ::.. : a. aa. &. a.. :ra . .... ::.....::...:......_.:.......:.:...:::........:......:.....:..........00.........:..::.::....._::.:::::.:::.:::&1 Sa Qdd:ML Ow 7 11! ANAM& do %a&w6 101111' so~ do soft M 4 � � - - - ? ..........•.......•.....•.•.• At I oo Iar :::::::: ::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::: :::: :: : :: :::::: :::::::::::: ::::::: ::: : :::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : :::: 'I . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : �r.�...... ..•...•........••.....•.. .......................•...•...•..•.......•.....•.........•...............••....•............................................ ::: ' I : :: 0a0::::00::09a0::::00':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::a0aaa00a0aa6a0:00..:.:::a0::0:::::::::::aa00 ........••..•.........•.•.............•............_...•.........•...........................•..............•..•. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .• . • . . . • . • • . . . . . . . ... . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • • . • • • . • . . . . • . . . . . . _ . • • . • . . . . .IF. . :. . . .II . . . . .`1I . . • . . . . . • . . . . _ . . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . • . .I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • _ . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IIF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . PROJECT LOCATION 9 ; :. ' .. ..... .................. ... ................ . ................. goo Gulf.................. ............... .. . . . . . . . of �-..;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::� :� .� •:=. :� �:�. �: .=:� .�. �:�. �:�. �: .�:� Mexico : .• 0aaaa0aaaa vaaaII ::::::::::::::::aaaaa :::::::: jaIF.. .I :::::::::::::. 9:::::::::::::::::::::::::::0 I`J '......................... .�:� a::::::::::::::::::::::::::.41 :::::::::::: Oa I �, I L 0 0 .% a * � vy 4 1 It a a a a a D a 0 a 0 0 a 0 9 a a a 0 a a a a a 0 0 a 4 a 0 6-10. % a 0 a 0 a 4 IN 0 0 a a a IN a 0 4 a a 4 a a 0 9 4 0 a 0 0 11 a a 9 9 4 ...••..•......•..........•..�.................................... .... .. .. .. .. .... .... .. .. .. . LEGEND::::::::::'.a0aaaaa0000a:::::::.''::::00009000a00a00aa0000a000:: , . , . . , , . . . . . , , ■ . . ■ , , . . . . . . , . . , 11.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . I� SANTA BARBARA WHITAKER RPUD .. �:. .:::::::::::::::::::::::::'.: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .. FLORIDA BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION AREA �_•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„_,,,,,:;,,,,,,,,,,,,��•.,_,,,;,,,,,,;;;,;,; �•� � �• •� i 0 n a 0 0 a a 0 r 0 * aFLORIDA BONNETED BAT CRITICAL HABITAT 0 :: a :: 0 :: 11 :::::::. ' ::::::::::::: . ..__ __ ---_.. .__ _ __...�. . .....•...................... ................... .......... 4k—.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ':' �,l NIP ��% �::::J:w ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ��4L. .......ws......•.............................. .. . . a a a j ( 0 0 a 0 a 0 IF 0 * 0 * 0 0 9 a a & a 0 0 0 a 0-41 � a a a m a `� tin . , ( .. r 1F. .. .,� *• , . 0A'le a . ... .. ...... ... ... ... ... . .. . ' ' ... .. . ... ... . . 09 0 1 2 3 �r� • : ,�' I :,na i ;.o,r-.cam. .:::a0aaa*a::aaaaaa00aa:a aaa4'.:::::0*aa090000000909a:a9aa0a.. — a9:T:.% .. Miles • ••..:6:.4. `= 0a4aa0a0aa006a 0a0600aa 0a9a00::0a000090900a000aa9aaa90 000110 ::: NOTES: ; ::.'S,.. %- ;;:9 I::.. :0::.::.: 0' a09ea0::::::::::::00:9044:040040::.0..:..::.: 00a04:0*::.::.. ...aa ...,.: t� ... ,. .... :......... :.. .. .... .. ............, .. .,..,......: ..,.. '. FLORIDA BONNETED BAT CONSULT4TION :: ...:.. ,�� 0._,... %..:� `.: Sti . S .'j: " ::::::::: :::::...::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: 0 AREA WAS ACQUIRED FROM THE USFWS I : � : ' : a" : ' : 9 0 a a ' : 0 0 a a 0 9 : a r' b` . • • � .::::::.00�............. ....... .................:::::: : ON SEPTEMBER 2021. . �...: ....... ;� �e.,�`� ....... ........ .... �t ' ....... ........................ . FLORIDA. BONNETED BAT CRITICAL :�: ....: ::�. ..! .ry...: ep a & ,ja t � ..0' 0a00aaaa0a6'' :::. '::'::: ::::::600a0000004004a040 •y . . �. . .1• • ./. ' 1 .�"� ..f.. Y .f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . HABITAT WAS ACQUIRED FROM THE �;r rY,. ,�,.��.-4 .:y : �,_ J . rr.. J " , ', r:: :..::: ' . : " :: ::::::::::::::::::::::: : USFWS ON SEPTEMBER 202E z ':�::. j: kk: ( a:�.. o r�:: r k�,%-� � a• .�•::::: ''IF a ::: ::::::::::::::::::::: f4: 9l� : : 4�y1'.8 & 9 :. K ... � �' a . .. S a.: IF � p .... ... ........................ 0 . it : . . 45:. .. ... I...,& ....:b •.: . .... ............................. I � DRAWN BY APPENDIX H. FLORIDA BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION P.F., R.F. AREA AND PROPOSED CRITICAL H:A.BITAT MAP REVIEWED BY B.B. REVISED DATE 01/11/22 DATE O1/11/22 DATE PASSARELLA Consulting �au1o�'"` & S S O C IAT E S iI n cd C)CO N $ � � a) m ct bn '�p rp Q) m U W ice' U P=4 o CO R p bn TS 4-i : a r -� ,O � u� p-, � F4 Q� (33 o � �m . cz�� o � .a � � O a) ;.4 DO CZ 4-4 co �. O bD 1:1 5=4 o bn Q Q) N cd cz W (3) O cop a) C+2 w (3) r a) � bn a) ZS O Q) - Milt Fox N CO ri N Q O r-I M Ln M 00 N LO Ln 00 N 00 LO Cfl CO M M 00 LO 00 U (6 LL +� N >_ N >, L ++ di U U co U m d0' J (6 4) 00 O ca � — 00 N N N v 3 3 N ai O O O O O 4r O O O p p >` O Z Z Z Cn U) = 2 O � o 70 o N cd -' oo �M � r a) c� `04 D w 0 '� 3 bn c� U Dco cc .II cd�� mmi rm4. CO z c o Q cam.) � c •—� � o �, CZ bn 'Q to co bn t~ . o s~ a) cd cd ,L U C� CO Q) bn CO U W bn O -� C) N � C� U r-, sa +� a) +� U U a) O CLi O •� Cn 00 a) +5 (� 4) O O p . � �-•� pp Q) M , Q � U rCi O Isis u U U N Jessica Tice Ashley Hockenberry m O a p � � 00 co O OMMI 4WD O cd a) Cd 4=D r U •� zS "o ' Z bn � t-+ W O r bn a) cd - + a) a) r� • .�-� 1 + U >13Cd U Cd r' �p � a) 4M'D �•�ao�a)��bio >1 HNC) ) cd � U �+ a) i cd cd cl) cd "'a ,f] TS i U O L � hD 'd ry'i cCi {w�y, p co Q a) a �i -i � A � 'a u1 ; -i � a' Q' rj)CO cd m cd kiwwi,, r"� 4-1 r cz W U +q) --i . rt bn +� O Q) < CZSa U Cd �+ cz CZi s a) o O a ; ) .p ,-Z p O CObA � cz Q CZ i rQ cdU a) 0 m U 0� PTO + 00 '� � U � N --i bn .bio a) �' O _' cd —' O U w.ow czr.8, r 3 �wc��4� cd a)p� ��� F-� U cd F-i CD 0 Q) rm + V cd ,C+=4—, -4=' i cn � �' � o � O a)bm a; cd 'a O 41 ;WA�+ to �� -� cz r.. i i a) +� w i i ObM4 +� by a) a), CZ�' cd p of CZ � i L y' ,i ;j CZ a) i Q) i 0 cz Q cd <- i� Z �. (n 4a O Qa 4=mdlCZ ;M4 adi . rpq a �-4 v Q �' o '' u o ram' o .n a �' O a) a) rd � p co bn a, cid mac.) 41J Pit CO 4p�q isCZ CZ cz � cz O O cd cd s i b) U � cd •�+ v • �' a) a) CZ a) a; s~ ! , , bn c� u� a� +� Cr a� `° C) t!) f.0 W ' o� a) i o zo a) CZ ao bn CZ a bA V CD o O (i) V a) +' Gcd•— �-, cd 4mD 4mZ r� cd a) r iu W cd U by : + • ,-� rod s�, cd a asD, 4.5 O ' a) i o .� a) a) +-1 • .i +mj a) i � to . rt u� O U a) 4mm U4.1 cd cd <Q bDN +' o �a) a) d�o� d�o o rdo ��ai O • ai cd o cd r-1 O•� �.�, bn i+D .� o 3 U a) o O cd o o r� a) N �'' cd p p � � CZ �+ a) N . ra �. bA cz o 0 o -� >, ,a; a) a) Cd � 70 p 3 cd [� 'd Q) O O Cd prt �' Q co i O :o �icdcd ocm)cd o 0� Pr., c � o� oa� o o�:i p p s� o a) U. mo �Q <Q cd . rt cd cd ;m, O ;•+ cd Q., 4 D Ashley Hockenberry Charles Towne m � a) cz cd � U O U U i•,, <s� + 4.1 `� rQ o U r!] bo O� +, +' r rd U CZ¢, cd cd O a) p (a) a) 9 � � a) •� CZ .� r, � F+ 05 PM R i cd a.) E-+ ,Q a ; d a�i p, �a� CO Q Cd co pc� 4] Cd r] rl) � U H 'it . co a) CZL) CZ o z� os N d pa i�o�d co o bn c�2 '� co;mq � ;M4 zr4 "-tlipa4--D C), �� U��� ��� 4M,4cf) N r N L .0 O -INJ 0 t!) CL V �CD 0 O O +' o�clikA t� m � a � w � � W Lin U U D D z v v .�" O O CL O O 0 F" U U un V) U U cu : O O ct � u ..0 3 U U U C6 C6 � 4=J a O 0 U U 4� O O � C m O 0 Ql Ql 0 OU cc 0 n Lo � 0 O ■N ■ Poo CD, (aLn \ O co 0 CalCL CB 0 � Ln U O O ]L ^ LL V 4 O u V O O N W � � a � w L rA :rA ct 0 �., t �- . 0 . U o CD CD H Ln Ln MU G.� � O U � � rNMENIMMI o -u a O Ln 0 N ca ' POO h!J in Ql E 0 cri o N m _O _N.'_' O � Qj ■,-r O (DM� Ln OW �L^�` CL7n , V V 0c m .� nLnll W 0 ~ V rPo$ 0 �4. I VAN %a ww�. :� r cc O O > Ln Ol a) V ��-+ cn Ql Q0 Q0 1- Ln QD N rl Ln m I I I O Oo o Ql f� CD V U m rl to N to Ln o0 ■ 0 d (U L W U Ol lD 0) Lz, > G) O CB M M Lr) (a) Ql m r- i r� Ln Cj) rn (�D U 4 N N N E„ M O U U) UO) u u ■ b0 , N C: Ln c: Ln �+ L U C6 U U L U L Cu U O v Q) (a)U v d- m � M 00 + � I QD +-+ c./ } to �D M O r�i O U �o L QD L- L U zt U ■ v O rn �:. U rn -cn- c /) O o It O O O O O O O N ca m c10 c6 m • W uo bmo bn U O t] 0 N Ln lD N Ln QD M QD m rn rn o E p U CD 0 U a O CD Gp~p� L Q) �NCDmq U co~ I Q) > (� ~ C�CDO CO � m Q) co N- 0 O L ~ ConCO (D C 00 N O +� Lo 01 (D L — O � 0 CD m 00 L CD Mc� CD Q) � M Q) CD 00 � = m V W a' co U. ti 0 W c CL _1 O O C U L L � �■1 m Q v V m cm Pr'7.kk w F Y'1 Ste ik'.��i+k.n•w wi � w i I J J J vj LL LL L . O O c6 m c� a) N a) N W M u mu uc n O C C: L C O O O � O) G) G� 00 00 O w � rl rl N LL LL LL G� Ca Ca C� � 4.) � -F� Ln +-+ CD CD (A � M 00 cz (a)V? O -tn- U L U L U •c O O c Q) v E" L LL LL L H cn rn M n n n �I boo W tw • a, =3 :3 Q Ql Ql .Q Ql �o U cn 4— 00 O 4— rl rl N jj)m Ln Ln 4=J '3 0 0 0 cn cn Ln a o 0 0 N N O O Ln O rn M t w bio E O E c o O co "M LMM - j CO _— a) U m con CD 1 O U b4 p� C� �+ C� QCY ) p� Mimi O Ln U) CD -00 Ln H � (D L f-- O O � V APO y i� V E 0 U cu u +� Ln Ln �Ln Q .� � V N U m (D Ln 00 � N M Lo N N CD c'n Q> m I :3 N o 00 O V} cI) O O v 00 I V Ln U� m N N CD d- '} Q0 Q O Ln rn y N w rn m m VI 4j c6 _ _ w D C C: U U M U M M U U U Ct3 C( r-1 U �; cn 00 CDQ Ln G) L r--i N r-I 00 '� CD Ln LIJ m� lD O L O � O O c/? m t/� O � v CD F" � N r� � Ln� m 00 ONO � O m L L Ln U M U U M U U M U `I m + + + • N o L L m N 0o rn O O O O O O 00 (9) O 4=J r-i c-1 `+ 4 4+ km� � r-I r-i N .� U U U U U U cu 3 C6 m m m m m 4.1 � 4J aJ Q) U •� Ql Ln CT Ln al Ol 00 00 C71 lD CD a N 4jn- 4 -c!) cn tr} to W pt N Lr) O Ln O N O d O L O N O O Ln O .,..� � (�D dl h.�0 hA bA hA t�fJ h!� tip C1A U O U OU V� co O CDU O co OLm� CO CIO cr) COU � CO U� U Q c�I`d" U) � NO 5 co CU D_ 4-r C� OOcO M O d-0� 0ON C.� F-- �Oco O m O U U~ co � m 0�0 � U co CO L E coLo I CU (D cn .� � W O cYj (0 O OI O (ll •P �C'7OO Cll COO .Q QJ �•r+•� O C to n (0 —J—O > O to CA O 00 L c X 70 M 00 X Co > cn V I� O r(10' C j N L ca D_ : L1._ LLCY Cll ~ a. U) .0 N E U cn cn Q) _ c U > O (i' w V m 1 r f �1 ri ta.4 0 a_ N u V U) L U T V m m CL' ~ 00 U +� U W V M U� U c +� p w w o W U cn m m U C U LL D D U) U U i CD � � >� Ln U Q Q N ' O O O p U U U U Ln cn `n un •� 'a U U U U L n + L n .� OU 00 N � �D c n -cn cn O o O o o � 4 O Ln Ln Ln 3 m N �D M O r� O O O O O O � c6 ca r6 � ca O O O Ln O N m LIi rn m E CO p p co E OU E CO M N �- OU O -�f" U U (D �� CD (D 4--i 00LO (D I U C.— N (a O 0CD N CO 0» uj C U � +� d' N mq . (6 CO ], U CD CO � C p U) �0�cn ISO �� m�00 c6 — co 0o co OD 00 O J C ••00 O 000o0� 00 V N o f o m X 3 LL .� \ r'- O a, D_ C V) U �•+ CD Qm O Q W W V p co m rir , O II E s 1 U C CB wo 0� C31 E • — RPM*'~ rn U '� . a O � M O LL 3 0 U O O cfn O O tl� M U ClA N CV �- N N m U m ca M U m U � O70 70 O O O U 0 0 U) L L O I 4- J I 00 Q Q� >' O ' U � � tu° �i O L Q4ftL U +� U U O •,•� U . U L V U O U +J 0 0 4=J U U cn L Ln E U Q m O o v o (00 4�j o 4�, E r- O O N o'CV V U U 4- cO C = C O (n co r. � F 70 — CD O U Cll � � O L ��ap� N� O .�.� X Q L m � (� O m X Z� Co C6 �..+ WIMEMJ O U C) L CY (D CO U Ur O � Cll }' CO C ca L o (a C6 a.. d- > U)U) O w N O Cn I— E +J i E w O O V m :3 E cr c•n W ow - , ii O O L U W CI3 L D z Cll 0 0 C13 C �_ U O CL Q • � a U 0 0 3 U_ U_ .O ...0 � U U � CD . LA j(6 N N Py iO~ W W 9: O J . O J U0 U06 a� CIO A � � E L 0 �C: LOco fz 0 CO N LO OU p \Un Cn Oco LO LO LO p O �cocoLo� �-? O� U C\J U� 4mJ M CD 1 CmO N— C I E 1CO co O ►•� V3 (D N ,� < 1 �LO --, 1 cu l..l �a co com +, 4=J L- Lo O U � 00 N Ca U co O co M ~ 4-1 I � co C V w (D m �, CD0 m U� cu 0o o LO o c cn � Q V 4=J ca � V = 9 L 1 t � J • bn L L L L L e O O _O O O r.y ..- cu U (z U Ri U U O Om O Q' s= O Q. ' L O O CL E Q U E Q U E 0.. U E Q. U E Q CIO U 061 3 0 0 0 0 0 �o CO �a Lon tz O_ -O co Q � ca � M CU ca M ctS � (� N N N N N W W W W W O Mimi U0 U0 U0 U0 U06 a� c o c O o o Co U U L c o E N U) p �O z U p O N N co C O U O N N L aU co0 �O oC0 �d�N o C acz O q r 00 N L Uj U N C_ L i C Ln v b1J W o >- a� U �' o > 0 o p c Q ono �m> 1 Q L U 70 Q��i j i a CO C oLo 0) � o 00 � U -o CO E N c CO � � � 00 Ct 1 � a��� � Uo o c� a ) �CO �j U o � cZ co CD LO N N o N Q aj 3 u cn �^ (A •L � ,� •L Q u C� =L L.'�'' can _ (/) .Q J 0 }, � V w V Q Q V w Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for edch new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact.. the Facilities Management Department at 2.39-377-0267. Please check [�] type of application request (one only): [�.] School Capacity Review [ ]Exemption letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, 1. Project Information: Project Name: Santa Barbara Whitaker RPUD Municipality: Collier County Parcel !D#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels}: Location/Address of subject property: Whitaker Road, Closest Major Intersection: S 11. Ownership/Agent Information: Applicant Names}: Agent/Contact Parson: Paula N.0McMichael, AICP, Vice PresidentlPlann ng Servicesl�101� Montes. Inc. (Please Hate that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: Telephone#: 2390 Fax: Email bate/time stamp: ena. Date a • - - -•s sue: ., _ .'.. NO- ON Or AMP • ' NOW NO mr Or Or Or Orp, INNOr Vie* 044 Or ft v +re MAW, AmIll0 � 1117" of test ir , tom• r •.t ,r IN le ON Orr, gimew v 0 ON No qp NO NO All. twor ,.: r vr Or {AN Or I ,VIM IN fit *, mg or N wimemar MINE mike a IN Of+a dog All, VON 0 •NO ? iSOWN't Or NO ame'.0morgeolso (%S ;4 Or ml An 0 to 16 INS A NOW NO 41111, Or win Or - ,K r NO ' • " ' Ali -., . ,,. Wad j, 010 do NI I It Or It • .. Nor t `� ' Nor 4 If IN 0 �f OWN 9 NO Ilk 10 NO r gm t NO d IN 1 ON rm I got 16 NO Or ON Sol am 80 0, Or ON ON All Or Or a NO )IF Alp film NO e ►' i Ne Nor • *. dot • all€ •� ,'r •I ON , R 4 t, .L . ' '. • , d► we f a _ 1 s �i �f o _ sNOW Node gle: :ire • low low Nor ANA OWN 6 14 9 •«• , • 'NIr - • rt �• j Of IV, on NO MOO dw • , ra • ' y , r I AgoIt 71 t d ' , ',. MNOW y,, , 'jj me �• I j�. L . r r it �' „ + ��44 t' �1 ,} h • ,w I •_.r 1 .Y • • 0 tid A VIM It dk Or Mal 1 •%, —?':"ice f,} _ i _.,r`" i %, . ~ i 0 ON f If a — r" , lgoo , i � 'It.�.-• !' 14'i tail -- Pr iA• + now ` •Vlew Well •� -.�.._NO If NOW •� �., ..fS�i �'� s ` .,sor t. �. Mm SC on I pas It OF - r �'r •r �.is ■■� 1f _p "�"' •�f>tIt el moom war am I ! i7 • ,ice. Saw AM Vt MOO;i tip low _ moo re 10, � IF I WIN No ON ft OL so am AM moo Ple 4110 IL a "ll mom A IN OR M So AN N VON Air to Masan" 9 later AL oil t�4 +� ' .• �• ,egs +ti■ 11�t 1 'y ~fit " •� � �.+ � 4 AV vp At WIN, r114 •NM I low \ ! . or'•� �r1• r ` ' tY IL WOO'er A r+ 1, ■ . WIN SON r Nor TO NO- I . 1V' _ ` 1 ev r L 'roll • it , _ fi�rr. =� NO r • ` NO. No Ar 2 i[`Nor SOL 46 No 4ew Oda ON Or 0 OIL Cos Its. No el w ON Or t lot - of A Ago, IL vat �` ILA 1 ,*. ~1 '. „ilk i �•i �!* County Public Ufilities Department Engineering &Project Management Division December 27, 2021 Paige Alsten Pai Kimley-Horn 8201 Peters Road, Suite 2200 Plantation, FL 33324 Subject: Project: Parcel #: Dear Paige: e.Alsten Water and Wastewater Service Availability Greystar (Waterford Estates PUD) 00409400007,00419720007,00420400002,00422200006 VIA: E-MAI L kimley-horn.com The subject project is in the service areas of the Collier County Water -Sewer District's (CCWSD) regional WTP and South County Water Reclamation Facility. Connections to the CCWSD's water and wastewater systems may be permitted only in the locations referenced herein, or in a superseding utility service availability letter, and only after the GMD Development Review Division's approval of hydraulic calculations prepared by the Developer's Engineer of Record in accordance with the Design Criteria found in Section 1 of the Collier County Water -Sewer District Utilities Standards Manual. Adequate capacity for this project is not guaranteed until the project receives a commitment for service. Water service is anticipated to be readily available to the project via a proposed 10" water main along the west side of Sunset Boulevard per the approved plans for PL20210001893 Christ the King Church (CNST). The pre -construction meeting for this project was held on 11/19/2021. If the developers who permitted this water main extension do not complete the project, then extension of the District's off -site water distribution system will be necessary. The County and the District shall bear no responsibility, fiscally or otherwise (time and schedule), for such extensions. Before service commences, facilities extended to the District's off -site utility systems must be dedicated to and accepted by the District at the developer's sole expense. The closest existing District water infrastructure is an existing 10" dead-end water main terminating at the northeast corner of the intersection of Adkins Avenue and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The next closest option is an existing 8" dead-end water main terminating east of the entrance to Youth Haven, at 5867 Whitaker Rd. Pursuant to Ord. 18-63, section 4.04, the water main must be extended to the west right-of-way line of Santa Barbara Boulevard when the eastern parcels of the Youth Haven PUD are developed. PL20170004466 Memory Care Cottages (SDP) was approved on 10/15/2019 and includes the water main extension on sheet C-15 of the plans by Pigeon -Roberts &Associates, LLC date,4/2019 (see attached). Apre-construction 4V Public Utilities Engineering &Project Management Division • 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 •Naples, Florida 34112-5361 •239-252-4285 •FAX 239-252-5378 meeting has not yet been held for this project. In both cases, the water main extension would be more than 200 feet from the property line. As such, connection would be encouraged but not required. Potable water source pressure shall be verified by the results of a fire flow test not older than six months, in accordance with subsection 2.2.1, paragraph A. Unless served by a master meter, the project shall include two independent connections to the water distribution system, as required per subsection 2.2.2 of the Design Criteria. Potable water is available for domestic use, fire protectionand irrigation, subject to the provisions of LDC 4.03.08 C, the Collier County Irrigation , Ordinance (2015-27), and other applicable rules and regulations. Wastewater service is readily available to the project via an existing 30" force main along Whitaker Road and Sunset Boulevard. Connection to the existing 4" force main along Sunset Boulevard, north of Whitaker Road, is unauthorized due to limited capacity. Please contact the Wastewater Engineering Section (WasteWaterEn ineerin2(@colliercountVfl.gov) to confirm downstream wastewater transmission system capacity and force main connection pressure. See the attached GIS screen shot for approximate existing utility locations. Record drawings for subdivision improvements can be requested by emailing the GIVID Records Room infrastructure within Bryan. Feir�colliercoun colliercoun County tvfl.Rov). right-of-way can Record drawings for CCWS D be requested by emailing Bryan utility Feir A preliminary utility plan must be reviewed and discussed at apre-submittal conference with representatives of the Public Utilities Department and the Growth Management Department, as required by Sec. 134-58, paragraph (b)(2) of the Code of Ordinances. This conference may be conducted by email at the discretion of the Public Utilities Department. Please contact Joanna Nicholson (Joanna. Nicholson @colliercountVf I gov) for assistance with this requirement. If YOU have any questions, you may contact me at (239) 252-1037 or Eric.Fe� Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E., Principal Project Manager co I l i e rco u n tyf I. Gov. CC: Steve Messner, Division Director —Water, PUD/WD; Beth Johnssen, Division Director — Wastewater, PUD/WWD; Ben Bullert, Principal Project Manager — Water, PUD/EPM D; Dan Roman, Principal Project Manager — Wastewater, PUD/EPMD; Brett Rosenblum, Principal Project Manager, GMD/DRD; Joanna Nicholson, Site Plans Reviewer, GMD/DRD; Utility Planning Section; Justin Napolitano <Justin.Napolitano@kimley. horn.com> - } - _ - - - - - 1 ---- - - y „ -- - - - - - - - - - ( �, - a. ALL I'Llk pip" LAW Am I ALL ILAS A- ,, ,�„a, r r, -mot ;,�� LIL AA r x' At Al pat III 'AApppp� AM IN ul Al Allow, III I l ► - Low III L' I pop al I'Ll AS apA All re At 6 LIMA All? IF ALL r Joe WIN ,'` a Alt mill As AL mA LA All 1 _a • ph,- ,- �� .'� III Im ` =,;ALI plAw All pop u AI to ALI Air IF I Ir All al r All I _ + T '1 t ILL r 11"- •. '' , - L _ 'y'i lei / - _ _, - - ILL pp� aims _ _ _ e _ _ -- LA -- A _ . � _ ..— . � _ t a - 3 R'F �. > LA I poll unS El A .;r_ I jc ,Cal- All - � r r=1 0 yCw - iI IRA pp L, PILI W AI .r - - AI pr I AM Ba rb�a r ,BLVD FEW= 3nd �01 J _ LAW FTIN ILL eL _ OD fi 1 1 wl �4 PA 1,► j Ap pI- � — �• , —R• iT AMAMI IL All It Al ml All i✓ ', A VIA iAm AL I �- F All SAMOA v 1 All ` ,� r- - I III ppow cot am IV) MAL C; 0 � tp V Vs 7 rr' —'-i _ I' - LL '', ;� CAI. _ U li 0 MID . ii, All It MD! ll_ ' i ' % � AM 1� pump 14 _i - _ . . If i I r AI �'V'1I 0 :_ iu n:p o_ci do, ALL ALL It It *14 Wi All a: dip ow p _ i }ALI- .4. - ALI . '� - - _ . - y -1- , 1rt , :s- '�,:' r IRA P Vcin 1 r/N wmroa66epmm :a�sgaM SBW-ZSE Wz) : d LLOL/91/rO 0ddrn ONY u0A3A8nS 03SN3on V Ao apa ow As GMKW xvo ainnes ♦L99roH oou+all +U �+d11 � xo(onm5 PwI+++IoM VOIu03d V d0 1V3S ONY MH Ll" SEW b `S 5 B 35 Pad 4 8 a7f�818601 LLoi/9L/Lo S J5 — 6 l N0I1V�1�112130 33S a+ awao 6ulddeW j 6uptuns IeUO§SaJad 9 En 'ON LLY 1DKInY Ornn ION � yro rgtna+ :aw A+�wt 98®9 H1 'ON NOt1VZINON1f1Y !0 31V�IilLU3J a :01 031311830 "" 'DNI'1bIlddS030 0NUS09VG r�N Wa e991z nSd 'u3111H •0 G1VN00 �q pajodaad dow 5i� axa o�rw »v �nroa M - 1 0 dJ Occ Q:i Q �t a 4 o O N 4 >, m p X ti cu m C) En Ln 2 2 4� V w = g a a ohs 10 W o atd a� o�Y IRE 8 13 Ln Gla U) Z OVc N yxv O ts Rat N CIO) _ v1 I ( Vf jQ uj Q n 2911 ^dozy ko 40/l18 I 13SN(1S rnz \Ln Rlti rzx o g �ut mot _ g dnle VaVBdVB VINVsCP ��'Sa-ii $i8 alit a�'�aa rr�TW i L4J 2 �C s O a R Lzt g R= �(x $ % ag W^ � (x m o u _ I: ai d � N H ^4 �u C ,.-. a d ^i �0 v/N warai66eP• M SMISEl6E2? tav04d N3ddym 0Nv NOA3ws 035N30n aooeepu SEikEI�'S64dg fl83$P�'UV 9eIM81B60t uemewr :nveaeunolt ♦L99roN etwan ro�� Addon �atenns pugngoJd V01WU V JO 1V35 ONY oe tna ZLOZ/CO/l0 38MYN05 3N1 InON1M1 OnvA ION ae �� 6UIddeW iR 6UaNnS Ieu*s9)OJd 9699 91 'ON NOUVZ18ORinY 30 31YOt3Ul M S09-6l NOUVOi31183O 335 "�e 'e aretawr eor Ol 031�I1a3� NN 'DNI 1VUVdS039 ONIlSOM OOt ' 1 4M0 E991L WSd 'a3rl►Y ''J OlYN00 q p»odajd dow siyl u. i.vrn ' 7M% e�wveo rJU eYM'f7 w � V) o x- a� a t� i� r '°° �r �f1lltOfJ3YNtD � USY —t'-- J�It ... " ,.. ,.. ,�.., ..... .2 Rig tr e j bbit }IIl ♦ , , , , , ,� ' ♦ yd > ♦ , V �i tl Sa ' ♦ " ♦NNI , xin ww L•E iii bb .inn .ticwn. �e t I ? b b a t 1 '' L ♦ , , ♦ I♦I ♦ ♦ * , ♦ Oj i y Q I I fi 1t I; b� oil O oil! I C 4 1 r !g!s rig fk wig �1 It 1 t7tlYA�H't0/ ,tams � I "t t >I tlq % �41 , ibaR S5 Ilk Ills �b °I-- Joy o" ust: SU5l u 1 ro"" "— V/N 9m'02WWnWA :34pm SB09-ZSE (6EZ) :au04d NOO11lV�• aw SEtbE'H'S�5 �oA 3s pn 4XA 0IO9 TBWt 6ulddeW)R 6uAatinS leuOlssaJOld m.'DNI'IVLIVdS03J ONllSOM•� IjIlN33 33S °N031311M30 u L9LS'oN "US31� '0IJ 0•ddon ; XAP"WS puoltt•tad N3ddV{Y ONV !!OA? 03SN30I1 w mans txra srurtoit VOINOU V 30 IUV3S ONV LZOZ/CO/l0 3Mn1VNO5 3H1 1nm m OnVA ION tiro wmhs lxro A3%" 9699 91 'ON NOUVZI80RInV 30 31VODUH3O 09 ,t 7A0't±GGtL �y$d '2l311IW '9 O1VN00 :A9 paAOdaad dow s141 a w- a U x s� a ---------------------- ,} 50 91JT 343solpro .II N1 Aa� m vQ� _ r� �m o 4'. y 99.67� N'y t I I PIP v a 4 up►Ly1 o Ail ry ' g z ,,� • w tl w ? tn to CN I a W too Z u En o o z 0 N N tl 11 N N :40 4 ry I NCH V. h— ryry ," I Wyecc +o I �zo i ,� n ,et �19 ltr.lrt:i%oN . �t; Adtn o\NLn o Edbad y �� ��Ou�i =� ;k 0 ir T a 1� b SOU ;^ b 2LF ' •• ..� ROM fdldtD791 s,si _D • �e � °iaytl��nci �g.t kt �ngq L' < ��_y0 add^tl�u nK1R$o �=i� € rj 3 "try^' q v % RRhh^ ogqrt1tppoa�pp>1rpp aq, appr,er gqeooegy�yp p�ypb% b u i a "k a g V H O O O N g b Vii gVE3 J0 V +vH Anis SOS-6l NOI1V0U11030 3363 Ol 031311830 /N w00b0*6ep6n.vAM *WXI M SMZSE (6EZ) MOW tDLSroN N�Ci 'oU NAM ? �►^L^S P�fsNioAd N3ddYM ONV NOA3AA!ln1S O35N3on SElbt 1�'s�9 dS ¢1Aoe D�tl 47�9 �0818b01 "• �X" VOINOl! V 30 lY3S ONV tLOt/fo/to waYNO5 3N1 inomM anYA ION cso bulddeW � W.AamnS leuOlssaJold ,Yp � _ IM A,,,,,� 9699 Ol 'ON NOUV2ppNlnV 30 31VOIJUMM 'DNI'lbIlbdS030 ONIlS09VO -,, at �";°„�„ MSd �a3„1M •9 OWN00 �q p��odaad dow s,41 a_ 6 w v is i1� s=1 U 9 x s[ a d< R Cy soh • �5 -III, -- III, -------------- VIVA --------- III, -----------------1--4,IV ---------- -_.. QWAMOB 1?SNfiS 01 1 011YA31_nl_0 13sNns My 'AI _ n ,9641r9 Alt OMS L (0) .9L'fr9 AL9;roA0s U �- ppp� Ad h 1— w► . g � w ctn �+z , aQ�a ti oINV 2 2pp y► OWN OU ut� a W^ QV� ? o itW W o n ,os'�r9 o 3 ot,9o.00N �� L&II to Ln � z g ;r. : .wry g dOw N � CL cc Ln Ok U H O 1 �e Q Lu a w a�r 4 5 , 55 I 4 0 (01 .9rrtr 3 sl,ol.WN $ e�J6 l k 3.Lss1.o0N 1 6 (nl ,BC-rtr 3Sl•01.00N \ i sic et rxuJ 1 _ aA _ (J),L0:1IC 3.51,0l.00N 0 ti n. QmocZN� Q co Z 'i CS 1 323 O .. � ten{ ^ n ♦y OI h h OO � 1q� ^ fy�{ O pOoi to 0)o,.or Y,.v N & bhpp �.pp_ �npppp N N v1 v1 In U5 N N N ���3���9g � u d u n B " 19 ' g a� u� uEl 7EuE'I A� a 't:17UN0NV 7Nt A• OLW)S]Y ]W SiN01L TH ONV IO AtY34011J 1VOT 7Nl 7W t731'OMAO t rm MIL/ONV OmLO mli1•' SIMi'"ww SONLMbW gvil7 O W N0�530'1WrttD]1MONV 7 01i 'SJ UNOW VS" 1 0 % 1NOf y 11 e VOId ld 'STldbN �1V 031VO01 8Vi 9N01 andj 'SXMVLS VOAOOL M VUOV O OW A19 06UM WWI ]Nl AS 03NLUUW SW SOUS I i I 0 u.J I Z LL Q on 0��0' U z NUJ Iw r` Q CL W }L I F- 0 W o m Too I w I Uim i I U. wm c I aw mimp I oU U (j) I I z � 0 J IW L—amino ----- moms, •— -----------------------=fk}i�3-�}b'fH----; • T Z W� I Z W WO 0 Z cv Q J ��� _. Z Z) Q <�aa Q uj00 �z wOwOW W0(D iiiiij pW U0 < E CEO CL < 0 cj u? Z >C�Z�� Zp �wz0� X W � m W z 0 00 O UOU Zv�zll o -I Z Q O Z 0 Q �uwCL Q�W w Z_ p W< COww Z n N tY 0 � I LL I�� wm CL I a <t N co I J I I I I I I I I Y J m JNINNVId hnDIIIH3W u44L A OC69 ��ll H:DdV ssiff vowov 'awn figs uIns ta>roo v�rt Ms os'" 9680000VV VSN 40NI 'S10311N08V VSI^I Z J OU N MONO Q JO KM xu a AKI" ns ww DHOWW Q CM D iY U W ODmW W LL oiiiim m uJ 0 O Q000 LL w O 0 w LL uw n. zW Oooz Uj Zz000 o �-�0W Z j Cn w 45a�'J m O �Q D Z LL W-i_O wUW U) omm crW z000 CL o¢w w W a ,w = N Z � m z Z boom N � -- ------------------ I'iiii,ep . . .' 0 0 4 0 0 .¢'� , 00 a) %,L..0 ''e0 . , . . . , . . . . . . . . w // � . . 10 CL j '.' i• % . : Y 0 m i"niinoi jov , 0 :JNINOZ Q M =�UW O�mof WU.aa �w 0vio F�w0 O O wU¢�Ji i=a - W O .= 'Zw �Oc= g zY0 U3 Z000 CLO HOW w Q J ' Z) 0 IL i wUWO (1) O—C)0 aoo ' 0 Q w w 0 Ni Z O Q W 0 J- Z 00(,)0 Q Q Q Q 0`tgolCie) ..rn Ot*�nj0 n u II i U) w j W Ww < mLL �- U U EL F. H U � U H E- o g " a w cr o: J H 0 a N to 0 Wool m a)u N 0 �� �v N 0 °' "Orm a- 4Z o m (D CO ma v oCUCO �� ��Cc 0 0 3 � a00 0 L. U) im w 0 c CL C: 0 o o Q CC ;U fQ N ^� to N LL O CL lic c N M 0 c1o0w110 ci 0 j to 'a >�agoj0 a� U a' c 0 2 c 0 N O p U 0 N N .�.= a 011 O N viiiiiiiiin L1_ a 4.aiiiiiiiiiO c -a no O ma cD, coUQw o CN J taw 4�'S ftfiiiiir O N i C O -a m •� C ommtown a 3 0 C: .a N N N NEC Iiiiiop Ec Ec a c�nUcL c"-v c o L 0 j C= Eui�°a'�¢ xcin>E°'Em N_Iiiimm JCL 202 442 41 z 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 v 0 a u 0 N w J Q O .. Y Q O O O O m � � Z � � � �� 1qM '{��-. � � � LL. � � ' � �� � _ � . i �� ��_ '' a !� ���r1,� ui � 1Li1 lir 3� � �, ,� '/� Y � �� V i�i r � � � ,a� �� � � � -�- .� �, � ,� � � _ �b Z W � � W W = J z fA W � � �- Q � Q J W Q � W ~ � � W Q � W W � C� (A U � � oZS Z � > Q � � d. W Y n- � 00 � Q ° � U � � � � � � � • �� • Y Q Y J Q �-- Z W w } Q m J J Q Z O ' � � � ` � 1 v1 i � �� O _� '�' _. � d __ . � � � ` } ; �� -� � �1 � � �Ca � � � ! � .>_, � � ...,�. �� � s� I,, ----� �,,-.- ,- a �, . �, - - c� ,� T . � � � }� z .� � � � �, J �. � �\ � f' 0 �� ��.� � � �� �, rt `�• � �� t3 � °�` .� __ � ., i j C, i" d ,C r- � m .4d1;.SC .. _�� .� � ..� _� � _ � d. OIC w .C?.� � {� � ri _.,,,, , � � � JpY�v� � _•� �� ' U g '�' , � m 1 � , - � .. w .. � � — .� � O Z O U U J � a Q Q � Z } �j Z w� O U (!� J Q F- Q w w W J J a. J 0 Z U r O Q W a Z ��0.6 2zoz Za gory �,�ao�dd zsr��zoz Prepared for: Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239.254.2000 1I a LMWAim�•��[iii'�1 Collier County, Florida 03/03/2022 Prepared by: Trebilcocl< Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.566.9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD — Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2U2 1 4P A P� � a P� I A r dF V I certify that this Traffic Addendum has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, P.E., State of Florida license 47116, using a SHA4 authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA4 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. `�Q�`.• �GENS. Cl�% No 47116 •'.� r 0�.•. STATE OF •:: 411Aft OR X 11,111101 Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida, 1=Naples, o=Norman Iebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebi Icock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2022.03.17 16:25:35-04'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Napies, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page �2 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD — Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2022 ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................................. 5 TripDistribution and Assignment................................................................................................................. 5 BackgroundTraffic........................................................................................................................................ 6 Existing and Future Roadway Network...... goes@* 0@06600001 4860040age 6 Project Traffic Impacts —Roadway Link Analysis.......................................................................................... 7 7 Conclusions................................................................................................................................................... Appendix A: Whitaker Road —Traffic Count Exhibits................................................................................... 8 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 3 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD —Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March zuzz Project vescription The Santa Barbara and Whitaker project is a proposed residential development located east of Santa Barbara Boulevard and on both sides of Whitaker Road, in Collier County, Florida. The approximate location of the subject site is illustrated in Figure 1. M Figure 1—Project Location Map at dt��.S�iF« Crntrr,�rty R�Cio R40 t d cou r yside coV" • �eac. M Coc,�ry� � w t � Irljfe�etlie lf�RsrApCl1 Rd y S.hocl f , Proposed Project 1RtapIf3 A�:1tIRi�t:is � aaRtltrwi+el�wM*roc► R1 Physicians Regional -Copier Blvd In support of this project, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) was submitted on January 14, 2022. The TIS documented the transportation impacts associated with the proposed zoning application. The purpose of this Traffic Addendum is to document transportation impacts on Whitaker Road which is not a Level of Service monitored facility by Collier County. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 4 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD — Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2022 Table 2 illustrates the trip generation calculated for the project in the submitted TIS. Trip Generation —Build-out Conditions —Average Weekday Multifamily Housing 108 dwelling units 730 11 34 45 36 21 57 (Low -Rise) Parcel B Multifamily Housing 108 dwelling units 730 11 34 45 35 21 56 (Low -Rise) The level of service analysis of Whitaker Road is presented externaltrafficgenerated by the project (refer to Iable 2). based on projected PM peak hour net The project peak hour assignment for Whitaker Road is depicted in Table 3. We assume 100% of the traffic will be on Whitaker Rd per the TIS. Whitaker Road —Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour Roadway Link y CC AUIR Link ID # Roadway Link Location y Distribution of Project Traffic PM Peak Hr Project Traffic Volume Enter . Exit Whitaker Rd* N/A Santa Barbara Blvd to Project 100% EB — 71 WB — 42 Note(s): * Not a Collier County monitored roadway; N/A =Not Applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 5 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD —Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2022 As illustrated in the 2021 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), Whitaker Road is not a level of service monitored facility. To support the roadway capacity analysis, 72-hour segment volume counts were conducted on Whitaker Road segment directly accessed by the project. Collected traffic data was adjusted to peak season conditions using the FDOT Peak Season Factor Category Report for Collier County. For more details, see Appendix A: Whitaker Road — Traffic Count Exhibits. We have also included peak hour traffic from the Shaddowwood PUD Tract E, which has a peak allowed trip rate of 187 pm peak hour trips per the approved Ordinance 2020-017. This volume equates to 118 entering trips (EB) and 69 exiting trips (WB). We have added these trips to the background traffic as well. Table 4 illustrates the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the future horizon year 2026. Table 4 Whitaker Road — Background Traffic without Project (2022 - 2026) 7PkHr, Projected 2026 Projected 2022 Pk Hr, Projected Peak Dir Pk Hr, Peak Dir CC Pk Dir Traffic Background Background RoadwayLink AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank ID # Volume Rate s (p/) tri hr w/out Project s (trips/hr) (%/yr) (trip/hr) Trip c1� Growth Factor Bank (3)(5) (2)(5) Whitaker Rd t4) N/A Santa Barbara 25 (4) 2.00% 1.0824 145 N/A 143 Blvd to Project Note(s): (1) Annual Growth Rate — 2021 AUIR for 2008-2021 peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes, or 2%minimum. (2) Growth Factor = (1 +Annual Growth Rate)4. 2026 Projected Volume = 2022 Volume x Growth Factor = 27 trips. (3) 2026 Projected Volume = 2022 Volume +Trip Bank. = 25. (4) Traffic counts illustrated in Appendix As PSCF = 1; Annual growth factor = 2%. (5) Shadowwood PUD Tract E EB Peak Hr Trips = 118 and are added to growth (27) and trip bank (25) numbers. The projected 2026 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable: N/A = Not Applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing and future roadway conditions for Whitaker Rd are illustrated in Table 5. Table 5 Whitaker Road —Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Location Capacity•. Conditions • • • • • iVolume Volume Whitaker Santa Barbara '• • to Project Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS =Level of Service. *Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Operational characteristics are assumed similar to Link # 144.0, Shadowlawn Drive, as illustrated in the 2021 AUIR. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 6 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD — Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2022 The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% A the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Table 6 illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on Whitaker Road. Based on the data illustrated on Table 6, Whitaker Road is significantly impacted by the project traffic. The analyzed roadway segment is not projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project traffic at 2026 future build -out conditions. Whitaker Road —Roadway Link Level of Service (LOSS —With Project in the Year 2026 2026 Roadway 2026 Peak Min LOS Min LOS cc Peak r r exceeded RoadCapacity Peak Hr r '-. • - without with Link Link • •Impact Capacity I (Pr• . • - • •- r • Volume odd - • - • Project Whitaker Santa Barbara Blvd • to' • • Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2026 Projected Volume = 2026 background (refer to Table 4) +Project Volume Added. � 1 1 The concurrency analysis has determined that Whitaker Road is significantly impacted by the project traffic. The analyzed roadway segment is not projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project traffic at 2026 future build -out conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 7 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker KPUD — Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2022 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 8 Sunset Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD - Traffic Addendum Whitaker KO Analysis - March 2022 2020 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 0300 COLLIER COUNTYWIDE WEEK DATES SF MOCF: 0.87 PSCF -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * 1 01/01/2020 - 01/04/2020 0.92 1.06 * 2 01/05/2020 - 01/11/2020 0.87 1.00 * 3 01/12/2020 - 01/18/2020 0.81 0.93 * 4 01 19 2020 - 01 25 2020 0.80 0.92 * 5 01 26 2020 - 02/01/2020 0.79 0.91 6 02/02/2020 - 02/08J2020 0.77 0_89 * 7 02/09/2020 - 02/15/2020 0.76 0.87 * 8 02/16/2020 - 02/22/2020 0.81 0.93 * 9 02/23/2020 - 02/29/2020 0.85 0.98 *10 03/01/2020 - 03/07/2020 0.90 1.03 *11 03/08/2020 - 03/14/2020 0.94 1.08 *12 03/15/2020 - 03/21/2020 0.99 1.14 *13 03/22/2020 - 03/28/2020 1.14 1.31 14 03/29/2020 - 04/04/2020 1.29 1.48 l5 04/05/2020 - 04/11/2020 1.44 1.66 16 04/12/2020 - 04/18/2020 1.59 1.83 17 04/19/2020 - 04/25/2020 1.48 1.70 18 04/26/2020 - 05/02/2020 1.37 1.57 19 05/03/2020 - 05/09/2020 1.25 1.44 20 05/10/2020 - 05/16/2020 1.14 1.31 21 05/17/2020 - 05/23/2020 1.13 1.30 22 05/24/2020 - 05/30/2020 1.12 1.29 23 05/31/2020 - 06/06/2020 1.11 1.28 24 06/07/2020 - 06/13/2020 1.10 1.26 25 06/14/2020 - 06/20/2020 1.08 1.24 26 06/21/2020 - 06/27/2020 1.09 1.25 27 06/28/2020 - 07/04/2020 1.09 1.25 28 07/05/2020 - 07/11/2020 1.09 1.25 29 07/12/2020 - 07/18/2020 1.09 1.25 30 07/19/2020 - 07/25/2020 1.07 1.23 31 07/26/2020 - 08/01/2020 loos 1.21 32 08/02/2020 - 08/08/2020 1.03 1.18 33 08/09/2020 - 08/15/2020 1.01 1.16 34 08/16/2020 - 08/22/2020 1.01 1.16 35 08/23/2020 - 08/29/2020 1.01 1.16 36 08/30/2020 - 09/05/2020 1.01 1.16 37 09/06/2020 - 09/12/2020 1.02 1.17 38 09/13/2020 - 09/19/2020 1.02 1.17 39 09/20/2020 - 09/26/2020 1.03 1.18 40 09/27/2020 - 10/03/2020 1.03 1.18 41 10/04/2020 - 10/10/2020 l.04 1.20 42 10/11/2020 - 10/17/2020 1.05 1.21 43 10/18/2020 - 10/24/2020 1.04 1.20 44 10/25/2020 - 10/31/2020 1.04 1.20 45 11/01/2020 - 11/07/2020 1.04 1.20 46 11/08/2020 - 11/14/2020 1.03 1.18 47 11/15/2020 - 11/21/2020 l.03 1.18 48 11/22/2020 - 11/28/2020 1.00 1.15 49 11/29/2020 - 12/05/2020 0.98 1.13 50 12/06/2020 - 12/12/2020 0.9s 1.09 51 12/13/2020 - 12/19/2020 0.92 1.06 52 12/20/2020 - 12/26/2020 0.87 1.00 53 12/27/2020 - 12/31/2020 0.81 0.93 * PEAK SEASON 27-FEB-2021 10:29:51 830UPD 1_0300_PKSEASON.T�T Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P age � 10 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD — Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2022 Trebilcock CansulI/ng SolUtiens 1 2800 Daw/s Boulevard, Suite 200 Site Code: Santa Barbara Blvd Naples FL 34104 Station ID: 29736 Location 2: Whitaker Rd Serial Number: 29736 Latitude: Yes Longitude: Yes 1/25/2022 West, Right East, Right Combined 1126/22 West, Right East, Right Combined Time Tue A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Wed A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. 12:00 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 3 0 3 0 6 12:15 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 7 12:30 0 3 0 4 0 7 0 2 0 6 0 8 12:45 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 01:00 0 3 1 5 1 8 1 3 0 5 1 8 01:15 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 3 01:30 0 3 0 0 0 3 1 2 1 4 2 6 01:45 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 4 0 5 02:00 0 3 0 3 0 6 0 6 0 4 0 10 02:15 0 4 0 5 0 9 0 9 0 7 0 16 02:30 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 9 02:45 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 6 1 3 1 9 03:00 1 3 0 5 1 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 03:15 0 3 0 6 0 9 0 1 0 6 0 7 03:30 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 3 0 3 0 6 03:45 0 4 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 04:00 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 04:15 0 2 1 8 1 10 0 1 1 5 1 6 04:30 2 6 0 4 2 10 0 1 0 3 0 4 04:45 1 3 0 4 1 7 2 6 1 8 3 14 05:00 1 3 1 6 2 9 1 5 0 7 1 12 05:15 1 1 1 8 2 9 2 4 0 3 2 7 05:30 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 4 1 3 1 7 05:45 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 1 1 2 1 3 06:00 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 06:15 2 3 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 2 0 3 06:30 1 6 2 2 3 8 1 7 0 2 1 9 06:45 3 5 1 3 4 8 6 1 1 2 7 3 07:00 1 1 0 2 1 3 1 2 0 2 1 4 07:15 4 2 2 2 6 4 4 2 1 2 5 4 07:30 4 2 0 1 4 3 5 0 2 2 7 2 07:45 4 2 1 2 5 4 6 3 2 4 8 7 08:00 2 2 3 0 5 2 1 1 3 1 4 2 08:15 5 1 3 1 8 2 5 1 4 1 9 2 08:30 7 0 1 1 8 1 3 3 1 9 4 12 08:45 4 1 0 1 4 2 1 2 2 0 3 2 09:00 0 0 2 2 2 2 6 1 6 2 12 3 09:15 3 0 4 0 7 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 09:30 3 3 4 1 7 4 6 2 1 0 7 2 09:45 3 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 10:00 2 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 10:15 2 0 2 2 4 2 3 0 4 1 7 1 10:30 3 1 0 0 3 1 2 1 0 1 2 2 10:45 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 0 1 2 3 2 11:00 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 2 1 6 1 11:15 3 1 2 0 5 1 2 0 4 0 6 0 11:30 4 0 1 5 5 5 3 0 2 0 5 0 11:45 1 2 3 0 4 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 Total 73 92 45 105 118 197 72 107 52 128 124 235 Day Total 165 150 315 179 180 359 % Total 23.2% 2962% 1443% 33.3% 20.1% 2988% 1405% 3507% Peak 07:45 06:00 09:00 04:15 07:45 04:15 07:30 02:00 08:15 04:15 07:30 02:00 Volume 18 15 11 22 26 36 17 26 13 23 28 44 Peak Factor 06643 00625 00688 0.688 00813 00900 04708 0.722 00542 0.719 04778 00688 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page �11 Santa Barbara Blvd and Whitaker RPUD — Traffic Addendum —Whitaker Rd Analysis — March 2U2 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions 2 2800 Da vis Boulevard, Suite 200 Site Code: Santa Barbara Blvd Naples FL 34104 Station ID: 29736 Location 2: Whitaker Rd Serial Number: 29736 Latitude: Yes Lonaitude: Yes 1/27/2022 West, Right East, Right Combined 1/28l22 West, Right East, Right Combined Time Thu A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Fri A.M. POW A.M. POW A.M. P.M. 12:00 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 2 1 3 1 5 1 0 * 1 0 12:30 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 * 0 0 0 12:45 0 3 1 0 1 3 2 * 1 * 3 0 01:00 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 * 0 0 0 01:15 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1 * 1 0 01:30 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 * 0 * 0 0 01:45 0 3 0 3 0 6 0 * 0 0 0 02:00 0 6 0 5 0 11 0 * 0 0 0 02:15 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 3 0 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 * 0 0 0 03:00 0 4 0 3 0 7 0 * 1 1 0 03:15 0 4 0 8 0 12 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 * 0 * 0 0 03:45 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 * 0 0 04:00 0 4 0 6 0 10 0 fi 0 * 0 0 04:15 0 7 1 4 1 11 0 0 0 0 04:30 4 5 0 12 4 17 0 * 1 1 0 04:45 0 3 0 3 0 6 2 * 0 * 2 0 05:00 1 5 1 7 2 12 0 1 * 1 0 05:15 1 1 0 4 1 5 1 0 1 0 05:30 0 7 0 3 0 10 1 * 1 A 2 0 05:45 1 5 0 0 1 5 1 * 1 * 2 0 06*00 1 1 2 8 3 9 2 1 3 0 06:15 0 0 1 5 1 5 1 * 0 1 0 06:30 3 1 0 1 3 2 3 0 3 0 06:45 3 4 0 3 3 7 1 0 1 0 07:00 3 3 0 3 3 6 4 2 6 0 07:15 4 5 3 5 7 10 7 3 10 0 07:30 4 1 5 0 9 1 5 * 2 7 0 07:45 7 0 3 3 10 3 3 4 * 7 0 08:00 4 4 7 3 11 7 4 * 6 10 0 08:15 4 1 1 0 5 1 4 1 * 5 0 08*30 6 0 1 1 7 1 1 * 1 * 2 0 08:45 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 * 2 5 0 09:00 1 2 4 1 5 3 4 2 6 0 09:15 1 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 5 1 3 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 09:45 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 * 0 * 0 0 10:00 2 1 2 0 4 1 * * 0 0 10:15 2 0 1 0 3 0 * * 0 0 10:30 2 0 0 1 2 1 * * 0 0 10:45 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 11:00 2 1 1 0 3 1 A A 0 0 11:15 2 2 2 0 4 2 0 0 11:30 1 0 1 2 2 2 * 0 0 11:45 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 Total 73 111 1 51 1201 124 231 50 01 31 01 81 0 Day Total 184 171 355 50 31 81 % Total 20.6% 31.3% 14.4% 33.8% 61.7% 0.0% 3803% 090% Peak 07:45 04:15 07:15 04:15 07:15 04:15 070000 07:15 07:15 Volume 21 20 18 26 37 46 19 15 34 Peak Factor 0,750 0,714 0,643 0,542 0,841 00676 0.679 0,625 0.850 ADT ADT:328 AADT:328 AM PEAK HOUR -PEAK DIRECTION -AVERAGE 3 DAY (TUE, WED, THU) _ (18+17+21)13 = 19 TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR -PEAK DIRECTION -AVERAGE 3 DAY (TUE, WED, THU) _ (22+26+26)/3 = 25 TRIPS Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 12 Owr In! - M%d#]M Prepared for: Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239.254.2000 �ma Collier Coun r plaHHI"9*GH91HGUFIHV Collier County, Florida 01/14/2022 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: Email: 239.566.9551 ntrebilcock@trebi Icock. biz Transportation Methodolo Fee — $ 500.00* Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Maior Study Fee — $1,500.00* Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 KII ILWuNINJ IIWwA, NIMI I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, P.E., State of Florida license 47116, using a SHA-I authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA4 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. ►►111111111/ .� • . ,� GENs. s,o' pQ;••�F' O� .•04 No 47116 O•..• STATE OF •'44: A O s.< �O . ���•' R� ..,.• �ONAL0%0:0 �,,1111► Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida, 1=Naples, o=Norman Iebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2022.01.14 15:42:33-05'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 2 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development— Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................................. 6 Trip Distribution and Assignment................................................................................................................. 8 BackgroundTraffic......................................................................................................................................10 Existing and Future Roadway Network.......................................................................................................10 Project Traffic Impacts —Roadway Link Analysis........................................................................................11 SiteAccess Analysis.....................................................................................................................................12 ImprovementAnalysis................................................................................................................................14 Mitigationof Impact...................................................................................................................................14 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan........................................................................................................15 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting).................................................................17 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations........................................................................................... 24 Appendix D: Transportation Element Map TR - 3.....................................................................................31 Appendix E: Access Management Policy —Table 1................................................................................... 33 AppendixF: Turning Movements Exhibits. a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a 0 a a a a a 0 a 0 a a a a a a a 0 a a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 6 a 0 a a a a a 0 a a a a a a 0 a 0 0 a a 0 0 a a 0 0 a a a a 8 a a a a a a a a a a 3 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 3 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January zuzz Project Description The Santa Barbara and Whitaker project is a proposed residential development located east of Santa Barbara Boulevard and on both sides of Whitaker Road, in Collier County, Florida. The approximate location of the subject site is illustrated in Figure 1. The proposed master site plan is illustrated in Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. :awa % Redo Rd Country CiU:i iz,Sut*r Adet... � )sA,Ae Square' 4 a Figure 1—Project Location Map at 8er: e Commons garSo Rd ;ouniry'side,Golf �R Country Cluj .1 is + ! cr o � cr A !744r� !r ' it) Freigri'. , ; is Rattlesnake Hammock Rd �lix rlt a oppe t._. � , py 61yd a1 Antj:L�E ,,.. . Proposed P ro j ect z Nap 1Nalmart��upercenter Fob'_ . _- K Nap Cotl�il' _ Fe u (nspira Apartments Rattlesnake H�tttock Rd 0 Physicians Regional Collier Blvd The subject project site is currently vacant. The property consists of 2 parcels: Parcel A —located on the north side of Whital�er Road and Parcel B —located on the south side of Whitaker Road. The development team (RPUD). requests to rezone the property to Residential Planned Unit Development Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 4 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 The purpose of this traffic report is to document the transportation impacts proposed zoning application which requests to allow development of up to 216 units (du): Parcel A-108 du, and Parcel B-108 du. associated with the multifamily dwelling This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines and Procedures. The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11t" Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. In agreement with the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations are illustrated in Table 1. Table 1 Land Use [SIC Code in brackets] ITE Land Use Code Total Size Parcel A Residential Multifamily #220 — Multifamily Housing Low -Rise) 108 dwelling units [ Applicable] licable ] Parcel B Residential Multifamily Applicable] #220 —Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 108 dwelling units [Not Total Development 216 dwelling units In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting the proposed residential uses, subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. For the purposes of this analysis, the traffic planning horizon year is assumed to be 2026. A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on December 15, 2021, via email. For details refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting]. Each parcel will have one full movement connection to Whitaker Road and one emergency access only on Sunset Boulevard. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 5 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version) is used to evaluate the projected trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and/or rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations, Residential Traffic Comparison Residential Multifamily component —The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides three unique land use codes that describe Multifamily Housing. Based on the number of levels (floors) provided, these are illustrated as follow: LUC 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise), LUC 221 — Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) and LUC 222 — Multifamily Housing (High -Rise). The LUC 220 —Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) represents a conservative high estimate and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. Conceptually, the project proposes 3-story buildings which are classified based on ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition standards as Low -Rise buildings (LUC 220). The common residential recreation amenities are considered passive incidental to the proposed residential use and are not included in the trip generation analysis. Internal Trip Capture The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Per ITE recommendations and Collier County TIS Guidelines and consideredfor this analysis. Pass -by Trips Procedures , internal capture is not The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass -by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass -by trips are not deducted for operational turn lane analysis (all external traffic is accounted for). Per ITE recommendations and Collier County TIS Guidelines and consideredforthis analysis. Trip Generation Projections Procedures, pass -by capture is not The estimated trip generation associated with the proposed development build -out scenario is illustrated in Table 2. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix C. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 6 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Table 2 Trip Generation — Build -out Conditions — Average Weekday Size Weekday (2-way) Parcel A AM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total PM Peak Hour Enter I Exit I Total Multifamily Housing 108 dwelling units 730 11 34 45 36 21 57 (Low -Rise) Parcel B Multifamily Housing 108 dwelling units 730 11 34 45 35 21 56 (Low -Rise) Based on the traffic data depicted in Table 2, the estimated net increase in external trips generated by the proposed zoning request is 113 PM peak hour two-way trips. Collier County's Concurrency Management System is intended to ensure that there is adequate roadway capacity available to serve current and future development. Transportation Concurrency is a measure of the capacity of the roadway system to support the adopted level of service for vehicular traffic. As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For County facilities, the level of service standard is measured on a peak hour basis. In agreement with the Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. The surrounding roadway network concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour net external traffic generated by the project (refer to Table 2). The site access analysis is evaluated based on projected external traffic during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (refer to Table 2). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 7 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 The traffic generated by the development is assigned to the adjacent roadway network based on the knowledge of the area, the existing transportation network, the location of the subject project, engineering judgment and consistent with the transportation methodology (Appendix B). The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour CC PM Peak Hr Project Roadway y Link AUIR Link ID # Roadway link Location y Distribution of Project Traffic Traffic Vol.* Enter Exit Whitaker Rd** N/A Santa Barbara Blvd to Project 100% EB — 71 WB — 42 Santa Barbara Blvd 79.0 Whitaker Rd to CountryRd NB 100% Exit SB 50% Enter+50% Exit NB SB 42 — ; — 57 Santa Barbara Blvd 79.0 Country Rd to Davis Blvd 50% SB — 36 NB — 21 Santa Barbara Blvd 79.0 Whitaker Hammock Rd to Rattlesnake Rd 50% NB — 35 SB — 21 Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations; peak hour, peak direction per 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report. "Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 18 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January zuzz Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour wawa P.adc Rd • LEMY0 N Cc�Intrt � / 0 k Freight &k -e iix Supe A:a �krifpp { . � :]i CC `-�i r:i � s.v:- rrri ice• P�4 Ad Protect Traffic Distribution by Percentage -��3C�1r1� ivai w 4 4 j Walrnart Supercenler .g Country i.; 15% 20°� �eacrA Co Vr� tray SChx�l �► �rption 5% 50% CL r $ VVvhitaker Rd to Country Rd J NB - 100% Exit 000000 SE - 50% Enter + 50% Exit s f n ` = �• Vl maker Rd 100% . flori 17 O0/0 20% 11 Natfufs0(* Rd insp ments p,dtlnnmk* jisimn xk Rd %'� rr' 10% Physicians Regional Collier Blvd << ` J �`�� � ,� `mod � `� • � 1 .- •. Redo Rd 4? Project Traffic Distribution by PNt Peak Hour � psdo Rd r SB 7; NB 4 Co�ntryside.G,: ' Q Gauntry CI��- l e?�MfA CO god VVB 6; EB 11 f Cr m SB36:NB21 V VVB14;EB8 .�4 Vtfiitaker Rd to Country Rd f a Alt r �•, Whitaker Rd W842: EB71 t SB 21; � r >, WB 9; EB 14 WB 14; :EBJ8 ;enmock Rd I n sl en�utv+er a Hmr"" Cck tir �'1r' rtt Physicians Reg,%no. JSB 4; NB Collier P'Vfl Lely 'y► St i Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 9 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 The existing 2021 traffic conditions are extracted from the 2021 AUIR. Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures recommendation of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate evaluated based on the annual peak hour, peak direction traffic volume (estimated from 2008 through 2021 as illustrated in AUIR), whichever is Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2021 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project, illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the future horizon year 2026. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2021- 2026) 2026 Projected 2026 Projected 2021 AUIR Projected Pk Hr Peak Dir Cc Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Back round Pk Hr, Peak Dir ' g Background RoadwayLink AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank ID # Volume Rate s tri hr w/out Project ( p / ) tri s/hr tri s hr % r * Growth ( p ) Trip ( p / ) ( /Y) Bank*** Factor** Santa 7980 Whitaker Rd to 890 4.00% 1.2167 11083 262 1,152 Barbara Blvd Country Rd Santa 79 0 Country Rd to 890 4.00% 1.2167 11083 262 1,152 Barbara Blvd Davis Blvd Whitaker Rd to Santa 7900 Rattlesnake 890 4.00% 1.2167 11083 262 1,152 Barbara Blvd Hammock Rd Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate —estimated for 2008-2021 peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes, or 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1 +Annual Growth Rate)5. 2026 Projected Volume = 2021 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. *** 2026 Projected Volume = 2021 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2026 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2021 AUIR. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 10 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic impact Statement —January 2022 As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County Five -Year Work Program (FY2022- FY2026), the evaluated roadway segments (Livingston Road) are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out (2026 planning horizon year). The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC 2021 2021 2021 Peak 2026 2026 2026 Peak Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Roadway Standard Dir, Peak Hr Roadway Standard Dir, Peak Hr Link Link Location . , y Capacity . , y Capacity ID # Conditions LOS Volume Conditions LOS Volume Santa 7900 Whitaker Rd to 6D E 31100 (SB) 6D E 31100 (SB) Barbara Blvd Country Rd Santa 7900 Country Rd to 6D E 31100 (SB) 6D E 31100 (SB) Barbara Blvd Davis Blvd Santa Whitaker Rd to Barbara Blvd 79.0 Rattlesnake 6D E 31100 (SB) 6D E 31100 (SB) Hammock Rd Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = bevel of Service. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2026 future build -out conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the area roadway network. As illustrated in Collier County LDC Chapter 6.02.02 — M. 2, once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS significance criterion, the development's impacts are not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 11 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2026 2026 Roadway2026 Peak % Min LOS Min LOS CC Volume Peak Dir, Link, Peak Dir, Peak exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link peak Hr Dir, Peak Hr Hr Volume Capacity without with Link Link Location Impact . Capacity (Project Vol w/Project Pro"ect? Project? ID # Volume Added)* ** by Yes/No Yes/No Project Santa Whitaker Rd to Barbara 79.0 31100 (SB) SB — 57 1,209 1.8% No No Blvd Country Rd Santa Country Rd to Barbara 79.0 31100 (SB) SB — 36 11188 1.2% No No Blvd Davis Blvd Santa Whitaker Rd to Barbara 79.0 Rattlesnake 31100 (SB) SB — 21 11173 0.7% No No Blvd Hammock Rd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2026 Projected Volume = 2026 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume Added. The proposed development is not located within the Collier County's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). In addition, the proposed development is not situated within the Countys designated Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCEA's and TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Policy 5.1 of the Collier County Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) states that "the County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved." Site Access Analysis The project proposes one full connection to Whitaker Road and one emergency access only on Sunset Boulevard for each parcel. For more details refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page �12 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Traffic Evaluation The site access is evaluated based on projected external traffic during the weekday AM and PM peak hour. The project estimated traffic is illustrated in Table 2 and Appendix Co. ITE Trip Generation Calculations of this report. Collier County's roadway network is comprised of State, County, City and privately maintained roadways. Roadways are generally classified as Arterial, Collector, or Local. Access management is the design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257, as amended. The Whitaker Road segment from Santa Barbara Road to Sunset Boulevard is the roadway segment accessed directly by the project. This roadway segment is not a Collier County monitored facility for concurrency purposes. The Whitaker Road segment from Santa Barbara Road to Sunset Boulevard is currently awest-east 2- lane undivided roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 30 mph in the vicinity of the project. As illustrated in the Collier County Capital Improvement Element —Transportation Element Map TR - 3 (Federal Functional Classification/Urban Boundaries — Collier County), the subject Whitaker Road segment is not designated as an arterial or collector facility. Refer to Appendix D: Transportation Element Map TR - 3. As such, for the purposes of this report, Whitaker Road segment is classified as a local roadway with a Class 7 designation. A review of Collier County Access Management Policy guidelines shows that for a Class 7 roadway, the established access management criteria are as follow: 125 feet minimum connection spacing; 330 feet directional median opening; 440 feet full median opening; and 1,320 feet (0.25 mi) signal spacing. Refer to Appendix E: Access Management Policy — Tablel. Based on our review of the proposed connection spacing, the proposed accesses exceed the adopted minimum connection spacing standards for a Class 7 roadway. Turn lane warrants Required turn lane improvements are considered site related. As illustrated in the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Right -Of -Way, Section Ill, if existing County ROW is utilized for these improvements, compensating ROW must be provided. The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; (b) multi -lane divided roadways — right -turn lanes shall always be provided; and (c) when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left -turn lanes. The assignment of the AM and PM peak hour trips anticipated at the proposed site access locations is depicted in Appendix F: Turning Movements Exhibits. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 13 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 The projected volume making a left -turn into the Parcel A site is expected to be 11 vehicles per hour (vph) and 36 vph during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively (refer to Appendix F). As such, a dedicated eastbound left -turn lane is warranted at the Parcel A access location based on the volume threshold criterion. The projected volume making aright -turn into the Parcel B site is expected to be 11 vph and 35 vph during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively (refer to Appendix F). As such, a dedicated eastbound right -turn lane is not warranted at the Parcel B access location based on the volume threshold criterion. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine traffic operational requirements, as more accurate parameters will be made available. The concurrency analysis determined that the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed RPUD development shall not exceed 113 two- way PM peak hour net new trips, based on the land use codes in the IE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Based upon the results of the turn lane analysis performed within this report, turn lane improvements are warranted at the proposed Parcel A access locations. In order to promote low travelling speeds in a residential environment and to promote traffic calming and safety, the developer may elect to provide a mini -roundabout at project main access location. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine traffic operational requirements, as more accurate parameters will be made available. In addition, the project will integrate into the existing road network thereby providing interconnection. The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 14 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development— Traffic lmpact Statement —January 2022 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 15 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development— Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 e , .. '-ntl -;.r r_,119 :ti:li.n . �:;�..e_inY a:•-+r mlal•ea,•1 <I tirt -tw.,u� Mtn x^a --H1•nrt, xnl .rs+nM .-_ s:rt H�1 �_Jl i?�Y JIl .1: :..1E1J�d �tl- �l i:iii rr 1.W _C ,L'__t3,_ IYJJI Jl _Us �,aL IM1'•l Jt:/U.I �N+:�:YW Yn it iGJ S•'^,:atkt I51_d �.'! NL JJS-M.'1'J,1t'JkM .! _ N •1:J fAV J.1 :G-t Y J tlL...tJ c'Q:2iC11� 'S31d�iN ; and? 2�S)sIV11HNi V JVS2JVS ViNVS sci� til L\t _KY*!o103i 1 HONV M Y:. ^:OYSCJv'P3VSA J CHOW w Op 0W 'Z_LL 10 <CL Z_ J I [ pOm 'z W f<--CL dU� z CrIx LLCLd ��W 0LL � ONE WO�$`L <�UPj` 0Zm tU Q�rr� U 0 W LL z w > U. a05 ! 11 cUC g / d >w �mw om 11 U ► U. Wm°U I �UWQ) u 11 A I <F � z��o w Z I� �� r •�\ ' ' 1 I Q ;i ;�: w a w— - u - m I d,3 UM J pm! mLL en cu CL no �-- ( zo wz ! 11 1 E—C zVT �-4 02 iiHAA-----• N - I1 LL a w 11 I 1 i of NFU' d�cn 11 U Q � ;I N°z <t LL w U .c m 1.1 tL CO m Uj w I m w0 I / � 1 �acUw z °°mom W ! I o a o o IL M qdL* is 1 it I I �f <tE ".z�0 a� Z0 1 p —00 M zd � N J � Z�ZmLIL 'I LL �LLc0 > i vio©�� U) wmw0J U�O0'd� K Q o a H W oz0'Zat o ir, O Z =awzO V U M q 0 X LJ CO W Qow� oWUo° Z Lul 0 'i .00 <C w w �UjQXW w z w W a N X w W z 5 m w �- J 1 �---------- i _--•-- --- Q U W t!) tY W UJ Llj z �n Q Z zz I q CD 1 Uj 1 l ''1 1 ' , ��nlinolded :JNINflZ QQUQ mo�c WYa �z �wJLL ma� � �LL tY F a N J h O m � (D Wmo�a� mE�sEs's w` -off CL 3 (D v 0M Em-`a Q c o p °Uaraca� a'NT3a' M �O id N m o utM rn M r� o Cr v� 7 � E Cd c V Cl C Q d) EN > �U.c C�a . ii L=; �¢ y E EN � N a W d 0 44 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 16 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 17 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date: December 15, 2021 Location: N/A —Via Email Time : N/A People Attending; Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers ichael Sawyer. Collier County Growth M NormanTrebilcock, TCS Ciprian Malaescu, TCS Study Preparers Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 David Boulevard, ph 239-566-9551 Review er(s� : Reviewer's Name &Title: Michael Sawyer, Project Organization: Collier Coun , Transportation Plannin Telephone Number: 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Hole Montes, Inc. Address: 950 Encore Way, Naples, F134110 Telephone Number: 239-254-2000 Proposed Development: Name: Santa Barbara and Whitaker RPUD Location: Project consists of 2 parcels (Parcel A Whitaker Road and east of Santa Barbara Boulev Land Use Type: Residential ITE Code #: LUC 220 — Multifamily Housin Description: The proposed Traffic Impact Ste and Whitaker RPUD protect. The applicant it Division Suite 200 i n Collier 'Low -Rise refer to ct a residential Bevel consisting of 216 multifamily dwelling units (du) — Parcel A 108 du and Parcel B_ 1.08 du. ill provide an affordable housing com Page 1 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page (18 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Wawa CoUntr f' s ings�e Squa 1 t CL Ar .J ' Figure 1— Project Location Nlap CIA In . /tYMI T/K T.Y /V} Rd . Rd . 4' el � n ZOnln Existing: Varies Comprehensive plan recommendation: RPUD Requested: approval for new development Rabo Proposed Project y wr Ins Apartments 9 41F "f Physicians Regional � Collier Blvd ,y Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study type: Since projected net external AM or PIVI project traffic is greater than 100 two-way peak hour trips, this study qualities for a Major TIS — significant roadway and/or operational impacts. Proposed TIS IA7111 include trip generation, traffic_ _distribution and assignments, siM*ficance test (based on 20/0l2%/3°lo criterion 10140 Page 2 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 19 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 The report will provide existing LOS and document the impact the proposed change will have on designated arterial and collector roads. Roadway concurrency analysis — based on estir The TIS shall be consistent with Collier Cn"nfv TIS Guidelines and Procedures. Trip Generation — ITE Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11 Edition. net external PM traffic. rates are not considered based on ITE and Collier �u.idelines recommendations. Site Access — Evaluate access restrictions based on current Access Management Policy. The analyzed roadway segments are not located within the Collier County's Transportation Concurrencv Exception Area (TCEA). In addition, the proposed development is not situated within the 's designated Transportation Concurrenc 's and TCMA's designations are provided i Growth Manaelement — Collier Study Type: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: South: Whitaker Road; West: Santa Barbara Boulevard Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Build Out Year: 2026 Planning Horizon Year: 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): AM and PM Peak Hour as Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Tri Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass -by trips: N/A Internal trips: N/A Transit use: N/A Other: N/A �licable Generation Manual, 11t' Edition Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County Traffic Counts and 2021 AUIR Site -trip generation: OTISS —ITE 11 Edition Trip distribution method: Engineer's Estimate 0 Traffic assignment method: project tripgeneration with bac Traffic growth rate: historical grov�th. rate or 2%minimum wth Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 20 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Turning movements: Projected traffic will access the parcels via Whitaker Road: Parcel A 50% to/from west and Parcel B 50% to/from west. We V L tAilfiJ countr�, Figu1•e 2 — Project Trip Dist�•ibu�ion by Per•centag� Project Traffic i Distrbution by Percentage caj & 15% 4w leacrif CMY hot ,, .ram � ♦ a � - M�naA� Mararngc« s � • i 20`'io � Absorption 5°�. n � w U Whitaker Rd to Country Rd N8 - 100"i6 Exit SB - 50% Enter + 50% Exit r > Vlthitaker Rd 1t�!`'/y '� �—^S�M�I1i5 pystrs x•.et�. •tr: a fiG F, Ix _. +�4p 42 A Physicians Regional ! - Collier Blvd Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 21 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic impact. ratement —January 2022 Special Features: (from preliminary stud�T or prior experience) Accidents locations. N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location &configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location &progression needs: N/A inn -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: Colli Base neaps: N/A Prior shady reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A I�liscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 al or Study - $1, Soo.00 liethodology Fee $500 Includes o intersections Additional Intersections - $Soo.O� each N �Il fees will be agreed to during tJte xifethodologtif meeting and must be paid to �'ransportation prier to oursgs�-c�f, f'on the application. 1 Study Preparer—Nonnan Trebilcoc Revieu=er(s) Applicant Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 22 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees mill be paid incrementally as Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. also provided below. r for additional or otheroptional services are Methodology Review - $54U Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Calker County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review} Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $754 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off -site improvements within the right -of= -way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Maior Study Review" - $1,5U0 Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency detertnination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembledreview of traffic growth analysis, revi , ew of off -site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $504 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the `2�Iajor Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "NUjor Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $504 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require a Fee prior to the completion of I Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 23 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 24 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Multifamily Housing (Low - Rise) Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have two or three floors (levels). Various configurations fit this description, including walkup apartment, mansion apartment, and stacked townhouse. • A walkup apartment typically is two or three floors in height with dwelling units that are accessed by a single or multiple entrances with stairways and hallways. • A mansion apartment is a single structure that contains several apartments within what appears to be asingle-family dwelling unit. • A fourplex is a single two-story structure with two matching dwelling units on the ground and second floors. Access #o the individual units is typically internal to the structure Cl" provided through a central entry and stairway. • A stacked townhouse is designed to match the external appearance of a townhouse. But, unlike a townhouse dwelling unit #hat only shares wa!!s with an adjoining unit, the stacked tawnhause units share both floors and walls. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided through a central entry and stairway. Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise} (Land Use 222}, affordable housing (Land Use 223}, and off -campus student apartment (low-rise} (Land Use 225} are related land uses. Land Use Subcategory Data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: (7 }not close to rail transit and (2} close to rail transit. A site is considered close to rail transit if the walking distance between the residential site entrance and the closest rail transit station entrance is'h mile or less. Additional Data For the three sites far which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. or the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip 252 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition -Volume 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Santa Barbara and Whitaker -Residential Planned Unit Development - Traffic Impact Statement -January 2022 generation resource page on the ITE website (htt�s:/I.www:ite:orb/technical.resourceslto�ics/trip: and.parkina. Generation/J. For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. It is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the trips generated by a residential site. To assist in future analysis, trip generation studies of all multifamily housing should attempt to obtain information on occupancy rate and on the mix of residential unit sizes (i.e., number of units by number of bedrooms at the site complex). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in British Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Washington. SQur�e Numbers 188, 204, 237, 300, 305, 306, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 525, 530, 579, 583, 638, 864, 866, 896, 901, 903, 904, 936, 939, 944, 946, 947, 948, 963, 964, 966, 9671 1012, 1013, 1014,1036, 1047, 1056, 1071, 1076 General UrbanlSuburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399j 253 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 26 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 x a r� O o O O O u v W W � x l O O O t m O O O co w CL L+J tV tV W N O O Cl Cy O© O ty ;t huh h Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 27 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 E roject Name • _ f ..IU �1512021 No City: ZplPostal Code; Client Name: Ed#ion: Land Use Independent size lime Penod variable 220 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 216 Weekday Housing (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit (General Urban/Suburban) I I� 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Best Fit (Lll�l) T = 6.41 kAfxp 0 f i f s i r FARM { 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) • C C f � i i • r i i i• •. f •. f i • f f f.'+.. • r r i Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 28 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 • a ject Name PERIOD SETTING • D 1512021 City: Zostal Code. Client Name. Edition. • • • i�nd Use Independent size Time Period Method Entry Exi# Total Variable 220 Multifamily Dwelling Units 216 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LIN) 22 68 90 Housing (Low -Rise) - Hour of Adjacent T = 031 (X)+22.85 24% 76% Not Close to Rail street Traffic, Transit (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 7 and 9 a.m. 22t3 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise} 22i3 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise} Methods 22 % [a i Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 29 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name : PM Peak Hour Project Name : Santa Barbara and Whitaker No RPUD Date. 12/15/2021 City: StatelProvince. Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name. Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 220 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 216 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LIN) 71 42 113 Housing (Low -Rise) - Hour of Adjacent T = 0.43 (X)+20.55 63% 37% Not Close to Rail Street Traffic, Transit (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 4 and 6 porn. Land Use Entry Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 220 - Multifamily Housing (Law -Rise) 0 % 71 0 % 42 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use Extemai Trips Pass-by°la Pass�y Trips Nan -pass -by Trips 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 113 0 0 113 Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, {)ne Hour Between 4 and f p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. ITE does not rin.*vrisimend Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 30 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 31 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 N a N CA u1 U a J 2cc CO W W W ❑ � 2 Q LO N O } Q J a Q U W W Z LL) J J W F- -J Roo LL a cc:N , r- Cuj C w w p O p 'CC o � z Q z O z Z O O 2 2 J W J i cr cLLI o ',1NC10� HJtf38 Wlbd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / T a ❑ z O ❑ W N Z a O W S F— O O N O O N a W O } O Z m d W }Z W F- } Z CL p W O WN W v ❑� cc 0 > O w ❑ a cc N U crz a OQ OU um � Q DCL 7- Q z 'S =O t7 =Q J � a_ Q W lWi. Q i 1 ■ C KINno:) 3QbaiuyviW illNnOJ GIIVM08*a 1 --- �.rrrrword... ■ .. ■ . �■.uu■r■■urwr■wr.� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i 1 r r r r r r 1 r r r r r 1 r r f f f r r r r r r r , r. r. O'• v X , LSJ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P age � 32 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 :11:11 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 33 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 cu N C CD N j000 UN 'U O �c CL W .E N 0 > _ _ O •" C v- ' ►_ c.. tU C , to L z c) () � cn a ro c M cno o _ c 0 o v c y +- LN�aCL QQarL � �cu v zr(oz�Zc� p ` •c c ' C O -p `t7 j� c c p 43 co (UU r a p c,.) C p ,.r CL a� O N Jc E v c �0000 ` >> ~ �= O Q CD cM M {NV N LO M&MO M�0 U 1 N -C C z a 0 0 CD C> coE cm d • � cc (D co co N .a E AMJ .c C c v � 0 CL CL � N Q cn E N x -a c ' E c c ai o M B (n :> a, (nco F— cn cn 'O "0 �D O U C C la) 70� U j .D y C CL- C di Q :D o ro s cn O � 70 L .� a) CD W ON o N WO -Q m Q .c •� > o %c CL � � 0 u- � CL cis vaQ�Q o00 0 ch i cn Q / n U) E LL �►• Vi C N o N cn q(t LO (D f*%P Z Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 34 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 35 Santa Barbara and Whitaker —Residential Planned Unit Development— Traffic Impact Statement —January 2022 WSG,,.7 FM Naples v FN NTS 1'1RGI-FM Q aox� W°0�111vd �4hitake Rd 0 Youth Haven Couxry Rd Project Turning Movements Map by Percentage Cry��WsY WSGL•FM NaFles� vRGi•i:M WhTtsit.r fld youth Have+j �`rsty Cw a�,b,aor W+ W►utats Rd a)aOEM 0 Jack Country Rd O 1�}1Chnst the K+ng Presbytetw Church 15 I L � 0 Jlk Rd ChurcLe h �!1t15t the King Presbytenan I N a v a t9 gIParc I A_ ri: 1 G I n I I I AM 11;PM 36 ,: ,48i�er fld AM11;PM35G1 t S d H W O L � m � 4 d a C 4Yft�r Fd ;i!� CAM 34;PM 21) I (AM34;PM21) � o V I ��iM Art 9 Wt,ttekr� Rd ad�:�x xYp Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 36 NIM SUMMARY Santa Barbara — Whitaker RPUD (PL-20210003155) Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall — Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104 The NIM was held for the above referenced petition. The petition is described as follows: Santa Barbara — Whitaker RPUDZ (PL-20210003155) The applicant proposes to rezone the property to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow for a total of 216 multifamily residential dwelling units (±10 dwelling units per acre) with some affordable housing. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. On behalf of Applicants: Ana Pedrajo, Greystar DeIp v Richard Yovanovich Es elopment East, LLC (Applicant) q., Coleman Yovanovich Koester Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Mantes Inc. Ciprian Malaescu, EI, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Sina Ebrahimi, PE, Kimley Horn County Staff: Eric unman, AIUr Principal Planner, Zoning Services Fifteen members of the public attended. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, the property owner, the other the process for approval, and provided a brief history and overview of the project. Mrs. Pedrajo provided an overview of Greystar Development and examples of got Greyspro tar Development jects p. The following corrunents/questions were raised by the members of the public in attendance: Public Hearin and Notification A question was raised regarding the public hearing and notification process. A letter was sent to property owners within 500' of the project notifying them of the NIM, and an ad was placed in the Naples Daily News. Public hearings are advertised by the county via a sign posted on the property and an ad in the Naples Daily News. General/ZVlisc. A question was asked. regarding Greystar Developments plans for the property; specifically, if they will keep the property or sell once the entitlement process is complete. Mrs. Pedraj o explained that it is too early in the process to know. Greystar Development both develops and manages their H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\NIM\NIM Page 1 of 2 Summary (4-7-2022).docx properties, so if the property is sold in the future Greystar will typically continue to manage the development. A question was asked regarding the number of units proposed and the size of the property. The applicant is requesting 216 units. The property is ±21.57 acres. The meeting concluded at approximately 5 : 5 0 PM. Page of H:\2021\2021162\wP\PUDZ\NIM\NIM Summary (4-7-2022).docx :. t � t'"! HOLES MONTES ASSOCIATES INC 950 ENCORE VVAY #200 NAPhES, FL 34110 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF 1NISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN I�i L��-lI,� - , PART �I~ 7H� t�5 rOnAY rani Published Daily Naples, FL 34'110 Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personal{y appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of th.e Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Co,{tier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;. that the attached copy of tie advertising was published in sa(d newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier Gounty, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mai{ matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, o.r corpo:ration any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper, 3/2't /2022 . ..... . ....................... Subscribed and sworn to before on March 21 st, 2022 :���, i��� '. Poi, PUBLICATION COST: $1,008.00 AD NO: GC10848667 � �� CUSTOMER NO: 530712 PO#: PL20�10003155 AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD W/ MAP 3X10 h _......... _ ....._ ....I too m4 _....__._................. __ 1...... _................_ ........._ .... . .... I...... I .......,. .....:................00 I'll ._I..._._ . :..........:..&..::: _........ The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. CO McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., -and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant at :the following time: and location: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall - Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104 The following formal application has been made to Callier County Growth Management: Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD (PL--20210003155) The applicant proposes to rezone the property to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to. allow for a total of 216 multifamily, residential dwelling units (±10 dwelling units per acre) with some affordable .housing. There are two primary entries into the site from Whitaker Road, with two secondary, emergency access only entrances to Sunset Boulevard. Th•e subject site is t21.57 acres and located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd. and to the west of Sunset Blvd. and is bisected by Whitaker Rd. in Sections 9 & 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. The property is currently zoned A -- Agricultural and PUD (Waterford Estates). too ei e: z pee Whitaker Rd m rr u m t c M, LA Rattlesnake Hammock Rd PERMISSION i^ Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD Location Map HOLEMONTES3 Business and property owners, residents and visitors- are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and Collier County staff. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting, If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at Neighba;rhoodMioeting hen ei .corn:;and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to ei @hffleto I Please reference Santa Barbara -- Whitaker RPUD in subject line. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Monies, Inc, 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 ,�' r CJ c� �� co �. 0 L .... U U O 'a L U L U .... ..t1 tv i� N Q� c/') tli Q� T3 'CS tcs CU O .� .� L U fa U O a-� cn N L (1'I O U N t� U :� 0 .� �° a� U .� C ..... U cU U ca N tl) U (� r r...� L 0 V] ca '� �2, C .� 0 O S.. O ?� O tII cn U N '�i � O Cll C1A C{i z... � � � � z. T3 U CU fCi � `� QJ ..� � O `�-" O O O O t17 1,,, O � O O � p� �!. �— S2 .S� O cnN � � �� ._., � O � � � O � � O O „� ..., � -O 't3 cv Q„ 4 .� � � 'c� � � L 1 � � O Q� "� � :v � � � � � �„ '� c� -- �n s� �.,,, ._ c� � :� � � � �� a� � � o �, o �,, � � � � � � o U 'i3 +� ttf O O � N � o • �- ono � � '� '� U � cll .� � � � CU � � � � � v 4J U �"' .� I'a I V / � /�� �� FYI ...� ..�2 ^' O N .... � �. >, � � c5 a� � '—' v � � as � ,�, � � c� � a� l� O � O O 'c� S�. j'�-� � !� � U � � � V J � � {U � � � �O � � O O Q.. aA O � cn f0 O ro � , � � T3 hA � � O- O � � � 'a ,� �„ ,� ' � � � � o � � o U � � � � U � z.. tt3 � U O O O .S2 � U O � � � O ca ct3 C '+"' "" � O '� � � Q.. � � O .� � .� �- tU }. v'� tU L- � •� � +�, O -O � � O � � O � U � `t3 ,,.0 O � O � O c� ..O „� � � � y- � '"' �'S O � O � c�i� 4-- O .� � ..... � �. � � � I""' ca 0 March 21, 2022 Re: Santa Barbara -Whitaker (PL-20210003155) HM File No. 2021.162 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant, have filed a Residential . Planned Unit Development (RPUD) application to Collier County Growth Management The subject site is �21.57 acres and located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd. and to the west of Sunset Blvd. and is bisected by Whitaker Rd. in Sections 9 & 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. The property is currently zoned A — Agricultural and PUD (Waterford Estates). The applicant proposes to rezone the property to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow for a total of 216 multifamily residential dwelling units 10 dwelling units per acre) with some affordable housing. There are two primary entries into the site from Whitaker Road, with two secondary, emergency access only entrances to Sunset Boulevard. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 6, 1022 at 5:30 p.m. at New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall - Room 211, 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34104. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeighborhoodMeetin gh may also email any coJmm%W or questions to reference Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD in su Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President, Planning Services PNCM/sek meng. com and we will send you a link. You Nei�hborhoodMeetin�(hmPl a�en .com. ease bj ect line. H:\2021\2021162\Vi�P\PUDZ\NIM1Property Owner Letter (3-21-2022),docx Naples � Far'r Myer I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Cade, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appeasing on the latest tax rolls of Collies County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. Signature of Applicant) � � • �. � � �� �. The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 21 St day of March 2022 by means of physical presence or online notarization, by Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., who is personally known to me �, or who has produced Signature of Notary Public f �� ,_ �.�� � �� Printed Name of Notary as identification. (Notary Seal) �� �- , . .: .�, t ? • . •. ..�._ ,.�.. �� � ,, �r � � ,: . � H:\2021\2021162\WP\PUDZ\NIM\Affidavit of Compliance (3-21-2022).doc ARMANTROUTJR, FREDDIE E TAMMY S ARMAMTROUT 3499 SUNSET BLVD MAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S MAPLES, FL 34104---0 09 �$109 �5®nanny oan� a�gi��au�ao �u�u �g x �uuJ 9z ��uJaa� ap a��anni�� 091�8/09 i•5G �C�any ��inn aigi��du�oo «8/9 Z x �� � azis laq�i ! ' i BURR, MARK 2990 SUNSET BLVD � ► ! MAPLES, FL 34112---2714 � �� � � �, !, �:� - ;� �l ,� �� I ,, ;� I COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY � 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVES � i MAPLES, FL 34104---0 � COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S MAPLES, FL 34104---0 ,- COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 W EST G RAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 �� ELBA DEVELOPMENT CORP 600 5TH AVE S STE 207 NAPI_ES, FL 3410?---6642 ; � GONZALEZ, JA1DtR 3012 SUNSET BLVD NAPL.E�S, FL 341�12---0 LAKE &WETLAND MANAGEMENT-WE,ST � ! COAST INC ;� 13721. JET PORT C01�1MERCE PKWY i UNIT 5 FT MYERS, FL 33�13�--0 i i _ _i LEE, MICHAEL C & DEBORAH �A 6120 WHITAKER RD MAPLES, FL '34112---2966 ,. MEYEr�. TR, ULRIKE A ERIK H MEYER MAF; T INA MEYER l�1TD 12/13/76 41555 GLC?CA MOR,A ST HARRISON T WP, M! 4�$045---145�� ' RiPPI�JGER, DEMISE L 3645 ROYAL WOOD BLVD MAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 W EST G RAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 DAN D QUINN REV TRUST 1895 TARPON RD MAPLES, FL 3410?_---0 FALLING WATERS MASTER ASSOC CAMBRIDGE PROPERTY MGi SWFL 2335 TAMIAMI TR N., STE 402 MAPLES, FL 34103---0 GONZALEZ, MADERLINE 6066 ADKINS AVE MAPLES, FL 34112---2979 LEE, MICHAEL C & DEBORAH A 6120 WHITAKER RD MAPLES, FL 34a.12---2966 MEMORY CARE COTTAGES OF MAPLES 1 SOUTH WALKER DR SUITE 3000 CHICAGO, IL 60606---0 fJANMEMAN, RICHARD J 3651 SUNSET BLVD, MAPLES, FL 34112---295 7 ROGER L LEMLEY DEC OF TRUST JETTA C LEMLEY DEC OF TRUST ►i �. COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S MAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER COUNTY ASSOCIATES LLC 5403 W EST G RAY ST TAMPA, FL 33609---0 DIPAOLO TR, PAUL & ANNETTE DIPAOLO FAMILY TRUST UTD 12/23/02 3601 ROYAL WOOD BLVD MAPLES, FL 34112---8838 '� FERN, RAYMOND J & YOLANDA D '� 3623 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAP LES, FL 34112---8838 KNOT COLD LLC 12 CRESCENT AVE WINDHAM, ME 04062---U LEE, MICHAEL C & DEBORAH A 6120 WHITAKER RD MAPLES, FL 34112---2966 �� MEMORY CAR�c COTTAGES OF MAPLES LP 1 SOUTH WACKER DR #3000 �i, CH I CAG 0, I L 60606---0 . �; i i 1 1429 SAN MARC(�S BLVD ! MAPLES, FL 34104---0 I ; � !► (�, ; . _. label size �i" �c 2 5/8" compatible wish Avery °5� 60/8`i�60 �tigi�ette de format 25 mm x �7 mm compatible avec Avery °5160181 �® PRICE, RICHARD W & ANITA L 3579 ROYAL WOOD BLVD MAPLES, FL 34112---$855 ROYAL WOOD MA,STrR ASSOC INC 4300 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLF�, FL 34112----0 I r, 1 1429 SAN MARC(�S BLVD ! MAPLES, FL 34104---0 I ; � !► (�, ; . _. label size �i" �c 2 5/8" compatible wish Avery °5� 60/8`i�60 �tigi�ette de format 25 mm x �7 mm compatible avec Avery °5160181 �® PRICE, RICHARD W & ANITA L 3579 ROYAL WOOD BLVD MAPLES, FL 34112---$855 ROYAL WOOD MA,STrR ASSOC INC 4300 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLF�, FL 34112----0 I r, • ROYAL WO00 MASTER ASSOC INC 4300 ROYAL WOOD BLVD ' NAPLES, FL 34112---8824 WHITAKER LAND HOLDINGS LLC B$cZ ASSET MANAGEMENT COR 13320 SW �_28TH ST . MIAMI, FL 33186---0 East Naples Civic &Commerce, Inc. 5595 Collier Blvd., Suite 107-49 Naples �,L 34114-3556 i 09 �8/09 ��®many aan� aigit�ou�oo uuLu �g x u!�u 5Z ��u�aol ap a��an�oi�� 09I�8/09 �5®zany �utinn aigil��u�ao «9/g Z x «� azis laq�l I • ! �' VIGILIO, JOHN ERIK � 67B RIVERSIDE AVE • , NORWALK, CT 06850---0 � �, �' �� �j �� � I� � i � WHITAKER LAND HOLDINGS LLC P � ! ► % B&Z ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP ! 13320 SW 128TH ST MIAMI, FL 33186---0 J Jil - � i i i ,I �• ,• � � �- - � � - �' ,r �� �� ,, i �� �� � � �� 11 � � �� �, I �� • � I � _ � � label size 1" x 2 5/�" compatible witi� Avery �5� 60I8���a Etiquette de format 25 mm x �7 mm compatible aver Avery °�� 6Q/8i 69 WHITAKER LAND HOLDINGS LLC B&Z ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP 13320 SVU 128TH ST MIAMI, FL 33186---0 ... Co[Ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col I iercou ntvfl.�ov Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 As of 10/16/2017 a!I Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for ali applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Mote — link is httgs://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 �'�,�v r � --- Ca �� P f ���ti.� / p .� �-- �-�' �'2.- 1�L13 i � f ` � �Lc- � Y� �- i L- iV � i''�-S iL� i � �e S� 1''�Lv�-S i � �� � �-- ��''c� t n .3 �-cr Lv� e n- — .��-.�.-- �r�-i � c'_� .�,, r �-i� �L�h �e r� Diu M �A-�->� �- L �x �-.✓ ��: r�-��c ��T� � �,�-, L ,G"�y If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. -along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(a7naplesgoy.cam Allyson Holland AMHolland�naplesgov.com Robin Singer RSinger(c�naplesgov.com Erica Martin emartin(a�naplesgov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available dafa at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required dafa. Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 2 of 5 Pre-app Notes RPUD/PUDZ PL20210003155 Santa Barbara Whitaker —Eric Ortman Ord. 91-31 formed the Waterford Estates PUD which remains undeveloped. The PUD contains four parcels; the applicant is proposing make a new PUD from three of the four original PUD's parcel and add to agriculturally zoned parcels immediately to the west. The fourth parcel of the original PUD is now a water retention pond for Santa Barbara, is owned by the County, and is zoned both Ag and Applicant proposes to build 216 multi -family units with roughly half of the units north and south of Whitaker. Buildings will be three stories. Bethany Brosious is working the vegetation and wetland portion of the project. The proposal includes ±21 acres which equates to a density of a little more than 10 units/acre. Applicant notes that he does not want to own the retention pond. Discussion over correct process —RPUD, PUDZ, repeal and replace, or something else. Nothing decided. Applicant to meet with Ray B. and Mike B. to discuss further. Applicant does not want to amend original ordinance as it is from 1991. Noted that the Sandy Land proposal is in a waiting pattern as the applicant for that project is still working on vacation issues. There may also be lingering ROW issues, particularly along Sunset. Applicant proposes to do the amount of affordable housing necessary to be able to build 216 units. Very broad discussion about level of affordable housing with nothing concrete noted. To achieve a density bonus of 6 units per acre, and based on 2.06.03, would require 20% AH at the 50- 80 range and 40% AH at the 80-120 range. Doing this would likely avoid the need for a GMPA. Collier County Growth ManaEement Department Principal Planner Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Direct line: (239) 252-1032 Eric.Ortma_n@colliercountvfl.�ov ThomasClarkeVEN From: OrtmanEric Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 11:56 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre-app notes for Santa Barbara Whitaker Attachments: Pre-app notes Eric Ortman.docx; pre app attendees.docx mat � 1�;r Vi.��'Z`s�•�f -- �: ,... - .� .�....,r-a...,..... - .... Collier Count Growth Management Department Principal Planner, Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Direct line: (239) 252-1032 Eric.Ortman_�colliercountvfl.�ov Visit our Webiste at: WWW.COLLlER000NTYFL.GOV Tell ins how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htt ://bit.ly/CollierZonin�. Under Florida Lat�v, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want ya��r e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do no# send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone Or in writing. information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis far the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: https://www.colliercountyfl.�ov/home/showdocument?id=69624 _...---- Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: https://www.colliercountyfl.�ov/your-government/divisions-f- r/operations-regulatory-management/zoning-or-land-use-application/zoning-other-land-use-applications . ThomasClarkeVEN From: KlopfParker Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 4:18 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: SaboJames Subject: RE: Pre-App RESERCH for PL20210003155 —Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD(PUDR) virtual meeting tomorrow Wednesday 12/29 at 1:30PM Comp Plan Notes for PL20210003155 —Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD(PUDR): The subject properties are located within the Urban Residential subdistrict which supports residential development on these properties. The Urban residential subdistrict has a base density allowance of 4 units per acre which would allow a maximum of approximately 86 units over the approximately 21 acre site. The applicant has stated that they are seeking 216 units on this site and plan to achieve that through the affordable housing density bonus. Comprehensive planning staff determined that a Growth Management Plan Amendment �GMPA) will not be required to achieve the proposed 216 units as long as the project meets the requirements of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance located in Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code. Parker Klopf Collier County Growth Management Department Senior Planner 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Direct line: (239) 252-2471 Parker.klopfCa�colliercountvfl.�ov Visit our Webiste at: WWW.COLLIER000NTYFL.GOV Tell. irs how we aye doing by taking oz�j� Zoning Division Survey at h ://bit.ly/GollierZonin . Under 1=lorida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-rnai! address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: https:J/www.colliercountyfl.�ov/home/showdocument?id=69624 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: https: r/operations-reeulatorv-mana�emen www.col l ie rcou ntvf I . zo n i n�-o r-I a n d-use-a ov/your-government/divisions-f- lication/zoning-other-land-use-applications . From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 5:23 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BeardLaurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <�aime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell �7 C�� • ThomasClarkeVEN From: RomanDaniel Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 9:51 AM To: BullertBenjamin; ThomasClarkeVEN; FeyEric; CDS-C; OrtmanEric Cc: ChmelikTom Subject: RE: Pre -Application Meeting - PL20210001631-Whitaker Properties (RZ) Tom, Comments for wastewater are still valid as well. Respectfully, Daniel J. Raman, PE, PMP Principal Project Manager 0 P��li� �l�ilit�e,� Dep�rtr��er�t Engineering &Project Management Division "Continuous Improvement" 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112-5361 Phone: 239-252-6214 Cell: 239-580-9380 www.colliercountyfl.�ov ��xow AR.E WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Surve From: BullertBenjamin <Benjamin.Bullert@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 9:49 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; CDS-C <CDS- C@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: ChmelikTom <Tom.Chmelik@colliercountyfl.gov>; RomanDaniel <Daniel.Roman@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Pre -Application Meeting - PL20210001631-Whitaker Properties (RZ) Tom, Eric's Pre-App comments below regarding potable v��ater service still apply. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you. Benjamin (Ben) N. Bullert, P.E. Principal Project Manager CoHnty Public Utilities Department Engineering and Project Management Division 1 "Continuous Improvement" rc 3339 Tamiami Trail East I Suite 303 I Naples, r 34112-5361 Office: (239) 252-2583 I Cell: (239) 877-6339 xowzE wE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke� � co I I i e rcou ntyf I .�ov> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 9:39 AM To: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfI gov>; CDS-C <CDS-C( <Eric.Ortman@colliercountvfl.�ov> CcChmelikTom <Tom.ChmelikC«�colli ercoun : RomanDaniel <Daniel.Roman co I I i e rco u ntvfl colliercount l.�ov>; OrtmanEric BullertBen jamin <Benjamin.Bullert� Subject: RE: Pre -Application Meeting - PL20210001631-Whitaker Properties (RZ) Good Morning all, colliercount There is a new petition for the above project and the Zoning Pre-App is today at 1:30pm. PL20210003155-Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD(PUDR). I attached the current Research for today's Pre-App. Not sure if Eric Fey is in today and I was hoping someone from Public utilities would be able to attend. Below are the notes I received back in July From Eric Fey for PL20210001631. Today's Pre-App is basically the same but with a new Applicant (Hole Montes). I am guessing not much has changed, just need someone from Utilities to indicate if Eric's Pre-App notes , Thanks To m below still apply. ?�oHsa.� �a.7ke Operations Analyst -Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htt bit.l C;a ieir C:;o &4 ti tN' Exceeding Expectations Everyday -----Original Appointment----- From: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@collierco_untyfl.�ov> /CollierZonin; Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2021 2:07 PM To: CDS-C; FinnTimothy; ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: ChmelikTom; BullertBenjamin; RomanDaniel Subject: Tentative: Pre -Application Meeting - PL20210001631-Whitaker Properties (RZ) When: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Via Teleconference/Skype - GMD Conference Room C - Planner: Timothy Finn 2 Tim, I am unable to attend this pre -application meeting, I am providing the below screen shot from our GIS utility may for the applicant's/agent's benefit: r ii . ry .. .;.. ,.�-^-6 _ »-''*� � - y _ Y �','7 �� .-(�I \/ 1 � t-� 7 `1 y�y��. �• i � - -r~� �-'� ✓i. '�w- , +�,i.. '�' -� '" ♦ +: �.'� r• ��t'r•?-�Not 4'' to j.�+ }i IN r� � fi'.� Yd't.•., jT.a.r AN A a Nei .IV fit, �.. ;�•MIAMI YSAINT _ _ 1.�1'. •�"` , tfij c SJ'M*, '041Oc' , ILL ILL IN l • r'f ... .;- Pride WAY y W -'r,N _ _w fl IN ftv OR Opportunit CiR +R Zoning: RM F �b = j- t y -� - ., All fry= , .� PU r ,� rr iOt NIPPON �. j 0. y - - �:IOANNINA t", r i INN �,o� - r Xr- O k a VA. VON Nip SAN -VILLIN IN I!LVFNFL� 1 Bill viANINL IN l IF AGAIN AM i * 4I cANN A, a ANN « AA 4 -' ,_ .. LAW AS NIL N: r, �Alt Or ILL All F'NA oil I I. R' Lc n i n g: T VON D `:�It, At Alt At ALL L . * TAIL Ili Per ce' IN I Now 0 �- 005 AMA r tea: r r.1 501 5 y— f �•i r IN v -I..—=PANAMANIAN — . ~ awat— � anin FEUD �0 _ 1 �- il NNVL ALL CROP IN, NWIN ON III R t �. WIN .t% IN �:AN The subject property 1s marked with the red star. r. esnin� Potable water service is not readily available at this time. The developer would have to extend a County water main to the property from the existing 8" water main on Whitaker Road, west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, or from the existing 10" water main at the northeast corner of the Santa Barbara/Adkins intersection, unless already extended by another developer. The applicant/agent should be aware of the following projects and may want to negotiate an agreement with the developers as to fair share contribution toward water main extensions: • PL20180001697 Christ the King Presbyterian Church (CU) • PL20200001208 Sandy Ln RPUD (PUDZ) • PL20210001045 ShadowWood Phase I (PPL} A utilities commitment documenting the requisite water main extension should be included in the PUD document. Wastewater service is readily available via the existing 4" force main along Sunset Boulevard or, if the existing 4" force main is found to have insufficient hydraulic capacity, via the existing 30" transmission force main along Whitaker Road. Thomas, Please include this email in the pre -application meeting notes. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager Public Utilities Engineering &Project Management Division Continuous Improvement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 ��xow ARE WE DOING?�- Please click here for our Customer Servi rve Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone ar in writing. 0 ThomasuamevEN From: SantabarbaraGino Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 2:09 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: OrtmanEric Subject: PL20210003155 - Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD (PUDZ) Attachments: PL20210003155 - Santa Barbara - Whitaker RPUD (PUDZ) .pdf; ResidentialRates0330.pdf, FUTUREResidentialRates0330.pdf Good afternoon Thomas and Eric, Please find attached the meeting notes for Impact Fees for PL2o210003155 -Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD (PUDZ) If you should have any questions or need any additional information please feel free to contact me, thank you. Gino Santabarbara, PMP Principal Planner Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees &Program Management Division 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252,2925 Gino.Sontabarbara@CollierCountyFL.gov Under Floridae-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. PL20210003155 Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD (PUDZ) Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coIHergov.net Impact Fees - COA a 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (23 )) 252-2400 Meeting No�eg lication and aDD fee required. No 33% estimated impact fees due for SDP a transportation royal. All impact fees will be assessed and collected on the building permits) based on proposed Multi -Family and number of floors at rates in effect at time of building permit a lication. See attached schedule for current rates, please note new impact rates will take effect March 30, 2022. Water and Sewer —Water and Sewer impact fees will be assessed based on unit livin area siz meter size. shed schedule for Greater Naples fire impact fee -Residential = $0.22 per sq ft, Commercial = $0.26 per sq ft. See attached schedules Fire impact fees are due at building permit issuance, remaining impact fees due prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. F- r+ Z C N tr. N vt �y X m oC m r, P-1 r, r. �z `7 h tr, C `^, C L ►.7 -•^• x \:. .•• v; CT C• .-• x N `T CT x t+ 6C tri iw^ V% ia5 6/: r!i 'f lf: f rfi r/i :f' Cf-.• Vf ff: f O r^ r^, vi r, r Cr J: t! t! !• Ef. /: rf tf fZ (r; (Al V: tr• (�;• rfl C c c o c'J N N N N N N CY CV C'J (` I rJ CV fJ N X o✓ oC X x .:c :.0 X JC JC or x ✓' OC r^: f^, rrl rr� r; M r^, r^l r. r^; •^, r''1 r'i � ri r: 3 ^; CV v, v : : CJ v, CV V r r- :c r. M Q r, tr, tr, . . N r`4 N N N CA f'^ r•^; N N N rJ N N r t, :,�• (f (f' b,G tf• faF f�1 tf: �' 65 (sc' bF_• SF• � '�' z nr CJ '7 'r N CJ N N CJ CJ n! — !` v, /J ff. Ff,• 'f: (f.• W Ff.• ( f.{ 6F• 6r 7 cc x DC tr vi tr, tr, � V• , tr, �^ Ff-• FA W tr4 C*&r 6f V- t/% (� fj• ifi 5f• £�• '•f Er, Z f G z X T V tii tric ✓\ J J J y M lr, J r r �' (f• FP, (f: ({ Gf bon �Orl EA tf bra ff, ff• '. Ef? V4 6� ..J J WT -r �r r'J N N l^1 Y_' h 'J_• DC Ef� Ef• 69 V! tr . bF fiG bS tf: 6i ' Cori (+`i fi (r i v, N V', tf, "'C: .;G ir; V', V, (r7 tri 5 .� r r '"• ` � � r` � r` r` rj c�j r C' l (!: bF• FinF{ Ef b5 65 bp", if. b•9 if.• fh r f J C tr. O tro r J ON r 1 tr, ►i -r WT f'J N N C-J N C'l f'J rV rJ r,i C' 1 M ('J r. Z WT r C'J N rV N CV C1l C'J N rl r 4 r'1 oC r.l x DC tr, tr; V; en v, v� tr, -- -- v kri Ir, tr4 Ln v r) r� -t -t -r "t -t 't :J3 ran (! Vi (!• [T t1% U J. v J one) 7fi `� .x. .ter. ^J ... .... 1^3 C [c cr WT WT rl., .ter ..., c _ Ind I C C CZ � J J l r cz C r -) " 'I CJ U U U •� •� _I I .� L L r^r ,b htf i C., O Cz; V1 o ' — J f /1 W �i N ('J C'J N N Z �Wy LL W cq Lr Cii cq `� 11 %C O M X: � O U rtjj Q f. '�' C4 L G 7 G N� ti L 0 � U t✓-, v W r J ifr = '• rr--1 U U J M.r_ E-� c� a rW Lr G - d a J L-7 3 J f h Z � r+; t h w'; tom; rr ram: rr t � N h �✓ r� Orr F , V: Eon Vr s' v: (A V, V) V, Eaoci 60�1 `t cF cf Cr) r C� M, r+ . r rr; r + rr� r^i r^r r^, rr, rr} rr, r`, re, Cr, / rV. vl V r r, rt (jr V. C!. rae'. V- C!- [!• i!.• CV rV CV rV rJ N CV rJ CV N N `, rl N E-- :.c x x x x x r x x x oc. :i- x Cam+ rri M ram, r', fr'l rr, C^ rrl Cfl r••': ^ _ f^. ('•'. r� (l fF• tf V 69 tf ff• V 6F,• rj-. Cr:• !• 1 r+ 4 fJ C I N h rC' rr..J, `. U` WT r`^ M, ,... ..., �,CA cr r� h h r'i rj rr V' V., V' V•• Vi cf: fF ! �' v: I 1 at rl r, r''1 rl rJ r', rJ rd rd rJ (!. V1 :f.' rl, r! ff.• !f.• LI' l!: 1• 'r T V.^ V, V; Y_ I,c C`l rV rJ r) CV rJ N O V- ff.• 64 L..S 6F• b4 f.F Er� 6f• bore t rar;• fT (i L U r. x �c• oc :r Gc r rr, V r�, zo:— 1 V C T ^ �• II / r _ (YC VF (r4 ff- (.f- 64 tvr7 (A CA tf,• V: 1 i— � f z C tr x :�. M r^, r^, M, r` ^ WT .... (f: rJc. 6.S Ef,• CA. 6f Ef,• r}i CfM ur7 '�? _ � M O v N N x :4 cc X x oc r� rl h h f 1 N N rV CV r4 N Dc h x x f1? 6S Ef.•tf. C*s E/ a rV- Vi 4f: f rn Sf3 E{i 6.0 br? Ef• b5 b5 Ef Ff Ef? f• fa4 r Coo oc U^ rV.• (!,r,� rA Ff: ra --T --t -t -t -t <r f N h z v rl N rJ rJ N rI rJ rJ N M r•l M r: wt M, 7 ram', fry, M Cam, C .^i di i% N rl rJ fl N c4 � ✓ '.G G, f J N — -- •-- -- -- -- N N � N rr, f' Vol (f' 'j' V• C/: f;• is; V, L. _ rJ rJ rJ r1 rd rJ rJ Y_' rl Y co: `, Lr V, V, V, V, Vi Mi V, V, vl V, V: V, V; M M r, Cr;' Cr..— •1 U ra N u L v I off r c Vi v:• C 114 •C L Lr twoFit •1 LIMCZ ^ v J J =f •.j .y C C i J a/ W�.// e✓- �: C o o C Q Q � Q L:i C L— �a� )POejv r ^ pet W N :t+ 'r w ... FEN rl r1 N N (/] r- r l rA N N U Q w % L e, C C C _. U •T.. W x cq Ccli U L mommomommolowwwNdmi A i.. ^ r4 r, [� C�•"• y bfT '� f�Y � 5 Q rj r� +' C3 — f J M L _O U u Lim W o � ✓ L L E'" p U I�1 rr✓_l 1�1 a h Ce) — 3 � w Q Lz h h G rJ iti N L J Cn ~ C rJ r� Cri . _ fV rJ (Al Cori t,. yrrl � T i� V rr 1.. � � T t f^ �rl rfi Vi N) CJ .V. u Ca Q L C N W L C i y I 1 � L H U � � u U i C/2 � U = V J J J r- T C :off per u t C: o �. �' COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.�ov ._. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239j 252-2400 Meeting Notes i.�- � � lam_ �_ J �-- iM�- t L � �/� �D_.� �[ � .I i� � ram..: Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicanf during the Pre Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 3 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Thomas, SawyerMichael Wednesday, December 29, 2021 2:05 PM ThomasClarkeVEN; OrtmanEric SangerCorene; Norman Trebilcock Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD pre app Follow up Completed Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist (agent and staff have already completed the methodology meeting. Please also add the following notes: Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting has been completed, please note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Please also note that the project will integrate into the existing road network thereby providing interconnection. ITE 11t" edition and 2021 AUIR will be used. Respectf u I ly, ��Iic�li���l �a��vver Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawyer(a�colliercountyfl.�ov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 ��G� �.a. ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 1:46 PM To: OrthRichard Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL202100031 SS -Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD (PUDZ) Attachments: Transportation-PUD monitoring pre app handout 2020.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Pre-app notes are attached. Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. Beard(a�CollierCountvFL Phone: (239)-252-5782 Under Fiarida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want your e-mail address released in response t0 a public records request, da not send electronic mai! to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 �,�.j,.z 3 .a, 6. Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum fiotal daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." l�7iscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022{5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant falls to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Subject: TempletonMark Tuesday, January 04, 2022 5:01 PM ThomasClarkeVEN 2021000315 5 Hi Thomas, Below are the landscape notes for this one: Landscape: Label the LBE's on the master plan. Respectfully, Mark Templeton, RLA Principal Planner/Landscape Review � • . � Development Review Division Exceeding Expectatlons, Every Day! NOTE: EmQii Address Has Chcxnged 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2475 Haw are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this email is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. i ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 1:55 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App RESERCH for PL20210003155 —Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD(PUDR) virtual meeting tomorrow Wednesday 12/29 at 1:30PM Attachments: PUDZ-PUDA checklist FOR REVIEWERS 2-2017.doc; Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Here are my notes for this one: 1. Please provide Enviro property please include nmental Data: Please provide FLUCFCS aerial the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts map of the subject and indicate which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met, Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 2. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear, and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 3. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). (25% preservation required.) Label the Master plan with a note that the preservation is to be addressed off -site and provide the calculation in the packet submitted. 4. Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. 5. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. (The preservation Requirement is 25%). 6. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite). 7. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. i �r} i-� 3 . � ; l 8. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the projects compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) Please Check off $2500 Environmental Data Fee. Craig Brawn Senior Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. Now are we dair�g? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkeVEfV <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 5:23 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown @colIiercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@colliercountyfl.gov>; ImpactFees <ImpactFees@colliercountyfl.gov>; MoscaMichele <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; HansenRachel <Rachel.Hansen@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov>; FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @coiliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre-App RESERCH for PL20210003155 — Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD(PUDR) virtual meeting tomorrow Wednesday 12/29 at 1:3013M Good Afternoon All, Please review the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for PL20210003155 —Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD(PUDR). The virtual meeting is tomorrow Wednesda Let me know if you have any questions. Thank You, ....................................................................................... Join Sk e Meetin Brid e Call Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist_(non-RFMU) Project Name -per- Z�z!600 4� 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents 924). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H. l .b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, f be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.14) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. Ifthe PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION —DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC —see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allotivable uses tivitliin Cozrniy required pYeserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. 3to1I11Water only when in accordance with the LDC. PQ Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07, MUlat preservedwill be on ` ! s Example.* A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species inc I luding but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed bird The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the p r0i ect. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: Environmental Data Checklist Project Name � ZvLC9c�v,�%55 The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC IS 3.08.00 1. Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identif}% on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (;FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.020060 r project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide for s legend aof the FLUCFCS Codes i - Aerials and overlay s- legibleatthe scale acreagep 'ded. Provide calculations for the rovi of native vegetation required to be retainedon-site.Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, the demonstrate criteriaeserve tion pursuantto 3.05.07 s been applicable, this report an aerial showingi boundaries along any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abuttin i Include2. *ect on s separate site plan, the01 boundary s the adesignations •nd overlays `r the 1 ACSC ST and Include this informationfinalSDP plat construction • r 13. 11171o,ere off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed. in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable licable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shorelill remain fully functional ne development. must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project wifor its intended use after asix-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. mere applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special TM Treatment Overlay Zones (WR-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk • s ' r '• s s s ! rl"Lav 11 'WrIL lallky"L31401 •pplications such as standard and PUD` i and i' s separatesite plan e • p with the reject boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. Management quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02, 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with. each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information neces compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LOU 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) sary to evaluate the project's a. Provide overall. description of project with respect to environmental anal water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and. the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. Indicate how the project design minimizes imp acts as mitigation for impacts to listed species. to listed. species. Describe the measures that are proposed 25. PUD zoning and CtJ petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) nor to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. document, pCopies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? 2 / . PUD master plan or PPL/SUP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. S✓ � �.✓O���eY �Otit.�f�l.t �._:.:: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.�ov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20210003155 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑' Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov curie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov ` Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ eidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov �, Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maggie OeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov .- ��' Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov '� Sue Faulkner GMP -Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov '._J Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov _ �_! Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov �__ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Rachel Hansen GMP —Comprehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel.hansen@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov `.—! John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov L! Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov Anita Jenkins Planning &Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf GMP —Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowsl<i@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 4 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.eov :r County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Ll Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 rchard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑''� s Eric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colliercount flov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brand i.pollard @coiliercountyfLgov Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. 2 James Sabo, AICP Development Review Principal Project Manager GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2905 252-2708 brett.rosenbium@colliercountyfl.gov james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov C�lMichael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ID Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@coil iercountyfLgov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov .j Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 Jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov L Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov El Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email Vt ,k.� •�l-c C -A a <<� LC�.� WOO (toe 5 e4v Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 5 of 5