Loading...
Agenda 09/13/2022 Item #17B (Resolution - PL20190000360 Seminole Trail Government Center)17.B 09/13/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Board of Zoning Appeals members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Zoning Petition - PL20190000360 Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use. Recommendation to approve a Resolution for the establishment of a conditional use to allow the development of Safety Services and related government uses as an essential service in the Conservation zoning district within the Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay (CON-ACSC/ST) pursuant to Section 2.03.09.B.1.c.2, of the Collier County Land Development Code. The property is 1.83+/- acres and is described as Lots 18 and 19 of Paolita Acres, an unrecorded subdivision, and is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) approximately 0.85 miles from Collier County's eastern boundary in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East, Collier County, Florida. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of Zoning Appeals ("Board") review the staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission ("CCPC") regarding the above -referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. The proposed development occupies more of the site than prescribed by Land Development Code standards for the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern ("ACSC"), so an Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity is under consideration as a companion item for approval by the Board of County Commissioners and Florida DEO. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is 1.83+ acres located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) approximately 0.85 miles from Collier County's eastern boundary in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East. The site is within the Conservation designation and Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) on the Future Land Use Map and is zoned Conservation zoning district and Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Special Treatment Overlay (CON-ACSC/ST). The site is not on Seminole Reservation property and therefore is subject to Collier County land use, zoning, and development standards. The petitioner requests a Conditional Use to allow an essential service facility, including safety services and related government uses. The site has been altered previously including a 2,040-square foot garage dating back to 1971. The Concept Plan submitted with the petition depicts a proposed two-story 14,712 square foot building that will offer a range of services and will be constructed to hurricane shelter standards and sized to accommodate the Tribal members in the vicinity. The Concept Plan submitted with the Conditional Use request depicts a single access point from Tamiami Trail East, generally in the same place as the existing driveway for the site. Buffers are proposed at project perimeters, and the native preserve occupies the northeast property line. A Site Development Plan (SDP-PL20190000223) has also been submitted concurrently with the Conditional Use request. It is proposed to conform to County height, setback, and buffer standards; no deviations are requested. Section 4.02.14.17 sets forth that approval of a site alteration plan or site development plan for development in the ACSC/ST district requires review by the Planning Commission and Environmental Advisory Council and approval by the Board of County Commissioners, except that the site development plan may be administratively approved if a conditional use has been approved. FISCAL IMPACT: The Conditional Use (CU) is for a safety service proposed to contribute to providing Packet Pg. 3278 17.B 09/13/2022 public services needed in the vicinity. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject property is designated Conservation as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan. The overall purpose of the Conservation Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural resources of Collier County and their associated environmental, recreational, and economic benefits. All native habitats possess ecological and physical characteristics that justify attempts to maintain these important natural resources. Barrier Islands, coastal bays, wetlands, and habitats for listed species deserve particular attention because of their ecological value and their sensitivity to perturbation. It is because of this that all proposals for development in the Conservation Designation must be subject to rigorous review to ensure that the impacts of the development do not destroy or unacceptably degrade the inherent functional values. Relevant to this petition, Conservation designated lands to allow for essential services necessary to ensure public safety. Based upon the petition proposing essential service uses capable of providing hurricane shelter as well as training, information sessions, and direct assistance on matters of security, fire safety, and personal welfare, and these uses being deemed allowed within the FLUE designation, this proposed Conditional Use may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. The subject property is also within the Big Cypress ACSC Overlay. An Agreement between the State and County is under consideration as a companion item to authorize a variance under Rule 28-25.011, F.A.C. to establish the minimum standards/maximum development to allow for reasonable use of the property to provide safety and government services, consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan and in compliance with the LDC. Transportation Element: The subject Conditional Use can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, and the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the roadway links have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project within the 5-year planning period. A condition of approval is included in the accompanying Resolution that the maximum total daily trip generation shall not exceed 25 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental Review staff have found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The project site consists of 0.70 acres of native vegetation onsite. A minimum of 0.63 acres of the preserve is required; the preserve shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: This Conditional Use petition may only be deemed consistent with the Conservation Designation of the Growth Management Plan if the companion Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida under 380.032(3), FS is fully executed. Then the Conditional Use petition will be consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC): The CCPC heard Petition CU- PL20190000360 on July 7, 2022, and they voted unanimously 6-0 to forward this petition to the Board of Zoning Appeals with a recommendation of approval. No letters of opposition have been received. As Packet Pg. 3279 09/13/2022 17.B such, this petition will be placed on Summary Agenda. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project does meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is a conditional use within the Area of Critical State Concem/Special Treatment (ACSC/ST) zoning overlay. The EAC heard Petition CU- PL20190000360 on July 7, 2022, and they voted unanimously 6-0 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Before you is a recommendation by the Planning Commission and EAC for approval of a conditional use authorizing safety services and related government uses within the Conservation zoning district and Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Special Treatment Overlay (CON-ACSC/ST). A conditional use is a use that is permitted in a particular zoning district subject to certain restrictions. All testimony given must be under oath. The attached report and recommendations of the Planning Commission are advisory only and are not binding on you. The petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that the necessary requirements have been met, and you may question the petitioner or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. In addition to meeting the necessary criteria, you may place such conditions and safeguards as you deem appropriate to allow the use, provided that there is competent, substantial evidence that these additional conditions and safeguards are necessary to promote the public health, safety, welfare, morals, order, comfort, convenience, appearance, or the general welfare of the neighborhood. As a further condition of approval of the conditional use, you may require that suitable areas for streets, public rights -of -way, schools, parks, and other public facilities be set aside, improved, and/or dedicated for public use, subject to appropriate impact fee credits. Approval or denial of the petition is by Resolution. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the Resolution approving Petition CU-PL20190000360 subject to the conditions as recommended by the CCPC and incorporated in the Resolution. Prepared by: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager Planning & Zoning Division ATTACHMENTS 1. CU-Staff Report 6-21 (PDF) 2. Resolution - 061422 (PDF) 3. Att 2 - Survey Update July 2019 (01170605xBA9D6) - Prepared (PDF) 4. [Linked]Att 3 - PL20190000360 Sem Tribe CU Meeting Package (PDF) 5. Att 4- ACSC AGREEMENT Seminole Government Center 051622 (PDF) 6. Sign Posting Affidavit Seminole Trail CU (PDF) 7. legal ad - agenda ID 22921 (PDF) Packet Pg. 3280 17.B 09/13/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.13 Doe ID: 22921 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Board of Zoning Appeals members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Zoning Petition - PL20190000360 Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use. Recommendation to approve a Resolution for the establishment of a conditional use to allow the development of Safety Services and related government uses as an essential service in the Conservation zoning district within the Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay (CON- ACSC/ST) pursuant to Section 2.03.09.B.1.c.2, of the Collier County Land Development Code. The property is 1.83+/- acres and is described as Lots 18 and 19 of Paolita Acres, an unrecorded subdivision, and is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) approximately 0.85 miles from Collier County's eastern boundary in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to Item 16A3) Meeting Date: 09/13/2022 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 08/09/2022 12:21 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 08/09/2022 12:21 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Mike Bosi Additional Reviewer Diane Lynch Growth Management Department James C French Growth Management Jeanne Marcella Transportation Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 08/10/2022 4:50 PM Completed 08/12/2022 7:56 AM Completed 08/15/2022 5:16 PM Completed 08/15/2022 10:35 PM Skipped 08/17/2022 1:44 PM Completed 08/26/2022 3:09 PM Completed 08/26/2022 3:12 PM Completed 08/26/2022 3:29 PM Completed 08/31/2022 11:37 AM Completed 09/06/2022 6:15 PM 09/13/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 3281 17.B.a Co t he- v County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY 7, 2022 SUBJECT: PL20190000360; SEMINOLE TRAIL GOVERNMENT CENTER CONDITIONAL USE (CU) PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: STOF Holdings LTD 6300 Stirling Road Hollywood, FL 33024 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent(s): Seth Behn, Esq. Lewis, Longman & Walker, PA 515 N Flagler Dr. Ste. 1500 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider establishment of a Conditional Use to allow for safety services and related government uses within the Conservation (CON) N zoning district and Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Special Treatment Overlay (ACSC- r ST), as provided in Section 2.01.03.G.2.b and Section 2.03.09.B.1.c.2 of the Collier County Land o Development Code (LDC), on +1.83 acres located at 57257 Tamiami Trail East. v GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject parcel is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 0.85 miles from the Collier/Dade County line in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East, Collier County, Florida. The property address is 57257 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Florida. (See location map on the following page) CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use June 21, 2022 Page 1 of 11 Packet Pg. 3282 17.B.a 0 CD w PROJECT LOCATI O H Dade County T Monroe County Location Map SITE LOCATION N-A C1 -5-ACSCI -ACSCI Petition Number: PL20190000360 Zoning Map N M N N Packet Pg. 3283 17.B.a PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject site is +/-1.83 acres near the southeastern limits of Collier County. The site is within the Conservation designation and Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) on the Future Land Use Map and is zoned Conservation zoning district and Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Special Treatment Overlay (CON-ACSC/ST). The site is not on Seminole Reservation property and therefore is subject to Collier County land use, zoning, and development standards. The Tribal Council, the governing body of the Seminole Tribe, requests Conditional Use approval for an essential service facility, including safety services and related government uses. The petitioner seeks to meet a growing need for access to information regarding public safety, basic medical services, community meeting space, and hurricane shelter access. The petitioner proposes this facility to help address health, safety and general welfare interests serving Tribal members whose homes are in proximity along the along Tamiami Trail. The site has been altered previously including a 2,040-square foot garage dating back to 1971. The Concept Plan submitted with the petition depicts a proposed two-story 14,712 square foot building that will offer a range of services and will be constructed to hurricane shelter standards and sized to accommodate the Tribal members in the vicinity. Main Entrance Rendering (Sheet A-900) by Bermello Ajamil & Partners dated 10-19-2018 Land Development Code Section 4.02.14 and the Florida Administrative Code establish strict design standards for development in the Big Cypress ACSC/ST Overlay district. Absent an agreement between Collier County and the state land planning agency (Florida Department of Economic Opportunity [DEO]) pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3), Florida Statutes, site alteration is limited to 10% of the site (but with a minimum allowance of 2,500 s.f.) and non -permeable surfaces cannot exceed 50% of that 10%. The proposed development occupies more of the site than prescribed by these standards, so an agreement is proposed for approval by the Board of County Commissioners and Florida DEO. The proposed agreement establishes the allowance for T N 0 N N CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use Page 3 of 11 June 21, 2022 Packet Pg. 3284 17.B.a a maximum of 50,000 square feet of site alteration, 38,000 square feet of impermeable surface, and 15,000 square feet of building floor area under air. This equates to allowing 62.38% of the property to be altered, and 76% of the altered area to be nonpermeable surfaces. The County uses the agreement to recognize the granting of a variance to allow the proposed development per Rule 28-25-011, Florida Administrative Code, which provides that local variance procedures shall apply to the Big Cypress ACSC, provided that no variance shall be granted unless such development is designed, to have minimum adverse impact on the Area's water storage capacity, surface water and estuarine fisheries consistent with Big Cypress Area regulations. The agreement is attached for information purposes only; it will be acted upon by the Board of County Commissioners when the BCC, sitting as the Board of Zoning Appeals, hears this Conditional Use petition. The Concept Plan submitted with the Conditional Use request depicts a single access point from Tamiami Trail East, generally in the same place as the existing driveway for the site. Buffers are proposed, including a 15-foot wide Type-B buffer along the southeast property line, a Type-D buffer along Tamiami Trail frontage, and a 10-foot wide Type -A buffer along the northwest property line. Native preserve occupies the northeast property line. A Site Development Plan (SDP-PL20190000223) has also been submitted concurrently with the Conditional Use request. It is proposed to conform with County height, setback, and buffer standards; no deviations are requested. Section 4.02.14.17 sets forth that approval of a site alteration plan or site development plan for development in the ACSC/ST district requires review by the Planning Commission and Environmental Advisory Council and approval by the Board of County Commissioners, except that the site development plan may be administratively approved if a conditional use has been approved. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is zoned Conservation with Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Special Treatment Overlay (CON-ACSC/ST). The majority of land in the surrounding area is part of the federal reservation lands for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Northwest: Undeveloped acreage zoned CON-ACSC/ST Northeast: Improved, zoned CON- ACSC/ST Southeast: Improved, residential, zoned CON-ACSC/ST Southwest: Undeveloped Acreage and residential across Tamiami Trail East, zoned CON- ACSC/ST T N 0 N CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use June 21, 2022 Page 4 of 11 Packet Pg. 3285 17.B.a GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Conservation as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan. The overall purpose of the Conservation Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural resources of Collier County and their associated environmental, and recreational and economic benefits. All native habitats possess ecological and physical characteristics that justify attempts to maintain these important natural resources. Barrier Islands, coastal bays, wetlands, and habitat for listed species deserve particular attention because of their ecological value and their sensitivity to perturbation. It is because of this that all proposals for development in the Conservation Designation must be subject to rigorous review to ensure that the impacts of the development do not destroy or unacceptably degrade the inherent functional values. Relevant to this petition, Conservation designated lands allow for essential services necessary to ensure public safety. Based upon the petition proposing essential service uses capable of providing hurricane shelter as well as training, information sessions and direct assistance on matters of security, fire safety, and personal welfare, and these uses being deemed allowed within the FLUE designation, this proposed Conditional Use may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. The subject property is also within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Overlay. The ACSC Regulations limit site alteration to no more than 10% of the total site size and installation of non -permeable surfaces to no more than 50% of any such area, except as provided by Agreement pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3), F.S. The Concept Plan submitted with this application proposes to alter more than 10% of the total site size. Thus an Agreement between the State and County is needed to authorize a variance under Rule 28-25.011, F.A.C. to establish the minimum standards/maximum development to allow for reasonable use of the property to provide safety and government services, consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan and in compliance with the LDC. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's February 26, 2021, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2020 Annual Update and Inventory N Reports (AUIR). T N 0 Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SPA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use June 21, 2022 Page 5 of 11 Packet Pg. 3286 17.B.a has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the Conditional Use application provided by the applicant up to 14,712 square feet of government and safety service facilities are proposed. Staff evaluated the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) which indicates that the proposed development will generate approximately +/- 25 two-way PM peak hour net trips on the adjacent road network Tamiami Trail East (US 41). According to the current 2021 AUIR, Tamiami Trail East (US 41) from State Road 29 (SR 29) to Dade County Line has a current service volume of 3,100 and a remaining capacity of approximately 1,033 north bound trips and is currently operating at LOS "C." Based on the information in the TIS provided with this petition the subject roadway links noted above have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff finds the petition in compliance with the GMP and is recommending approval with the following condition: • Transportation Planning Staff Recommended Condition of Approval: The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 25 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Review staff has 5 found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The project site consists of 0.70 acres of native vegetation onsite. A minimum of 0.63 acres of preserve is required; the preserve shall be placed o under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: This Conditional Use petition may only be deemed consistent with the Conservation Designation of the Growth Management Plan if an Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida under 380.032(3), FS is fully executed. Then the Conditional Use petition will be consistent with the GMP. • Staff Recommended Condition of Approval: The Conditional Use is not effective until the Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida under 380.032(3), FS is fully executed, and no other development orders will be approved until said execution. CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use Page 6 of 11 June 21, 2022 Packet Pg. 3287 17.B.a STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based. This evaluation is completed as part of the Zoning and Land Development Review provided below. In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the Conditional Use petition to address environmental concerns. The property is located within the Area of Critical State Concern- Conservation/Special Treatment Overlay (ACSC/ST-CON). A majority of the property has been historically cleared and used for Seminole Tribe activities since the 1970s and early 1980s. The Concept Plan provides a total of 0.68 acres of preservation; the preserve will include 0.11 acres of wetland restoration. The ACSC Agreement limits site alteration to a maximum of 50,000 square feet. The preservation requirement is being met in accordance with an ACSC Agreement per Florida Statue Section 380.032. The environmental data indicates the proposed project is in an area that has the potential to contain a variety of protected plant and animal species. The only listed species observed onsite was an American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). The proposed impacts will occur in areas that have historically been developed; therefore, any American Alligators utilizing the site will be unaffected by the proposed project. The proposed project is located within core foraging ranges for eight Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) colonies; the nearest colony is 18.6 miles from the subject property; no Wood Storks were observed on -site. The loss of wetlands on site will be required to be mitigated, which will address the loss of wood stork foraging habitat. The proposed project is located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) consultation area for Bonneted bats (Eumops floridanus). Although there are native vegetated areas present on -site, no evidence was found indicating the trees were being utilized by Bonneted Bats. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicate the N presence of Black bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP review to address garbage containment and to provide o awareness for people visiting the property. N The Environmental Data indicates the subject property falls within (FWS) Primary Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) habitat. There were no observations of panthers on -site and the telemetry data indicates Florida panthers are not present within the boundary of the proposed project. However, because of the property's location, the surrounding areas contain habitats preferred by the Florida panther (freshwater forest). Consultation with FWS to obtain panther mitigation may be required. Before approval of the first SDP/PPL, a second protected species survey of the subject property will be required to ensure construction activity will not impact listed species. The second listed species survey will primarily be focused on Bonneted Bat; however, all listed species will be evaluated for their presence within the subject property boundary. Consultation with the US Federal Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) regarding guidelines and permitting requirements will be required prior to construction. CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use Page 7 of 11 June 21, 2022 Packet Pg. 3288 17.B.a This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project does meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is a Conditional Use within the Area of Critical State Concern/Special Treatment (ACSC/ST) zoning overlay. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition, the following conditions of approval: • Environmental Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval: All outdoor lighting must be held to the minimum necessary for security and safety in accordance with state and federal guidelines for listed species. The Developer shall adhere to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Black Bear Management Plan, as applicable, at the time of PPL/SDP approval. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and recommends approval. Landscape Review: A landscape plan will be reviewed during Site Development Plan review to ensure compliance with the LDC requirements for perimeter landscape buffers and plantings. Conditional Use Findings: Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property of uses in the same district of neighborhood; and 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable: 1. Section 2.03.09, of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Conservation zoning district. The requested use for safety services and associated government services is allowed as conditional uses in the Conservation zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, conditional uses procedures, of the LDC. T 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan N (GMP). Subject to a fully executed agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida under 380.032(3), F.S., this request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and, with the conditions proposed by staff, this project will be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC). The Concept Plan and building are designed to an appropriate scale for the purpose and location. No deviations are requested. 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. a CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use Page 8 of 11 June 21, 2022 Packet Pg. 3289 17.B.a Ingress and egress to the subject property is limited to a single access point from Tamiami Trail East (US 41) as shown on the Concept Plan. The existing driveway is proposed to be widened and improved to meet FDOT standards. The Concept Plan provides for vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The relatively limited scale of the development ensures that no significant traffic impacts are anticipated. Accommodation of fire and emergency vehicle access and circulation is depicted on the Concept Plan. The TIS submitted by the petitioner indicates that the adjacent roadway network has capacity to accommodate the proposed project. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. The maximum trip generation for the Conditional Use shall not exceed 25 two-way p.m. peak -hour net trips based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. The development will be reviewed during Site Development Plan review to ensure compliance with the LDC requirements for perimeter landscape buffers and setbacks. This compliance with the compatibility standards imposed by the LDC will assist in mitigating any effects the proposed Conditional Use will have on the neighboring properties. Due to the remoteness of the site, central utility facilities are not available. In these situations, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requirements apply, and the following standard condition of approval is recommended by staff. • Staff Recommended Condition of Approval: Design of the septic system will be determined based on final building size and daily staffing and operations, in accordance o with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requirements at the time of ^! SDP. Washing of vehicles would be considered industrial waste and would need to be N reviewed by FDEP for the how disposal of this water will be handled. N 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The petitioner proposes development of an already impacted site, and the site is designed to be compatible relative to the adjacent properties. Most of the surrounding area is undeveloped, natural lands. The petitioner has indicated that the development and design of the plans was coordinated with the owner of the adjacent residential property to the east. Proposed building design is represented in the petitioner's submittal of the Main Entrance Rendering (Sheet A- 900) by Bermello Ajamil & Partners dated 10-19-2018. • Staff Recommended Condition of Approval: Architecture shall be similar to the image depicted on the Main Entrance Rendering (Sheet A-900) by Bermello Ajamil & Partners dated 10-19-2018. a CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use Page 9 of 11 June 21, 2022 Packet Pg. 3290 17.B.a HISTORICAL / ARCHEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD REVIEW: Archeological sites are identified in proximity to the subject site on Collier County's "Map of Areas of Historical/Archaeological Probability." A Phase 1 Cultural Resource Survey and Assessment was prepared by the applicant. The Assessment found that two features eligible for the Tribal Register of Historic Places and the National Register of Historic Places are: 08CR00927, Tamiami Trail (within 98 feet of the subject site), and 08CR00928, Tamiami Canal (within and along the subject site). The Assessment concluded no adverse impact by proposed development. Additionally, Land Development Code Section 2.03.07.E.2.ii outlines that activity shall immediately stop and protective procedures must be followed if, during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity, an historic or archaeological artifact, or other indicator is found. • Staff Recommended Condition of Approval: Excavation shall be monitored by a certified archeologist. In accordance with Land Development Code Section 2.03.07.E.2. ii, activity shall immediately stop and protective procedures must be followed if, during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity, an historic or archaeological artifact, or other indicator is found. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project does meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is a conditional use within the Area of Critical State Concern/Special Treatment (ACSC/ST) zoning overlay. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the petition, subject to the conditions enumerated in the Staff Recommendation on the following page for the Conditional Use. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was held on Tuesday, August 31, 2021, at 57303 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, which is immediately adjacent to the southeast of the subject site. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m., and the duration was approximately ten minutes. Twenty local residents and Tribal members attended and two people dialed into the phone line. The petitioner's representative Seth Behn, Esq. presented the background, reasons, and design for the proposed facility, noting it will support hurricane shelter needs in the area. The Concept Plan and architectural rendering were displayed and explained, and an opportunity was given for attendees to ask questions. No commitments were made by the petitioner. A NIM summary is included in Attachment C. T N 0 N CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use June 21, 2022 Page 10 of 11 Packet Pg. 3291 17.B.a COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PL20190000360 on June 8, 2022 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition CU- PL20190000360 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the three -page Concept Plan accompanying the proposed resolution and subject to the following conditions: The Conditional Use is not effective until the Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida for building within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern under 380.032(3), F.S. is fully executed, and no other development orders will be approved until said execution. 2. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 25 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 3. Architecture shall be similar to the image depicted on the Main Entrance Rendering (Sheet A-900) by Bermello Ajamil & Partners dated 10-19-2018. 4. Design of the septic system will be determined based on final building size and daily staffing and operations, in accordance with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requirements at the time of SDP. Washing of vehicles would be considered industrial waste and would need to be reviewed by FDEP for the how disposal of this water will be handled. 5. Excavation shall be monitored by a certified archeologist. In accordance with Land Development Code Section 2.03.07.E.2.ii, activity shall immediately stop and protective N procedures must be followed if, during the course of site clearing, excavation or other r construction activity, an historic or archaeological artifact, or other indicator is found. N N 6. All outdoor lighting must be held to the minimum necessary for security and safety in N accordance with state and federal guidelines for listed species. �? 7. The Developer shall adhere to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Black Bear Management Plan, as applicable, at the time of PPL/SDP approval. Attachments: 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Sketch of Boundary & Topographic Survey 3. Application/Backup Material 4. Proposed Agreement per Sec. 380.032(3), F.S. dated May 16, 2022 CU-PL20190000360; Seminole Trail Government Center Conditional Use June 21, 2022 Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg. 3292 17.B.b RESOLUTION NO.2022 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY SERVICES AND RELATED GOVERNMENT USES AS AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE IN THE CONSERVATION ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN AND SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (CON-ACSC/ST) PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.09.B.1.c.2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE PROPERTY IS 1.83f ACRES AND IS DESCRIBED AS LOTS 18 AND 19 OF PAOLITA ACRES, AN UNRECORDED SUBDIVISION, AND IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US 41) APPROXIMATELY .85 MILES FROM COLLIER COUNTY'S EASTERN BOUNDARY IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PL20190000360) WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), being the duly appointed and N constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use N to allow development of safety services and related government uses as an essential service within the Conservation Zoning District in the Area of Critical State Concern and Special c Treatment Overlay (CON-ACSC/ST) pursuant to Section 2.03.09.B.1.c.2 of the Collier County o Land Development Code, on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has made findings that the granting of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect o the public interest and the specific requirements governing the Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code; and [I 9-CPS-01942/1726976/1] 136 Tamiami Government Center (Seminole) PL20190000360 1 of 2 6/ 14/22 Packet Pg. 3293 17.B.b WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: Petition Number CU-PL20190000360 filed by Seth Behn, Esq. and Michelle Diffenderfer, Esq. of Lewis, Longman & Walker P.A. representing STOF Holdings LLC fka S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd., with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby approved for a Conditional Use to allow development of safety services and related government uses as an essential service pursuant to Subsection 2.03.09.B.1.c.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code, in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit "B" and subject to the conditions in Exhibit "C" including Architectural Renderings in Exhibit "D". Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D" are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and super -majority vote, this day of , 2022. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: N Deputy Clerk William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman N 0 N N Approved as to form and legality: N v Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Legal Description Exhibit B - Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval Exhibit D- Architectural Renderings [I9-CPS-01942/1726976/1]136 Tamiami Government Center (Seminole) PL20190000360 2 of 2 6/14/22 Packet Pg. 3294 17.B.b EXHIBIT A — Property Description Parcel No.: 01238680000 Site Address: 57257 TAMIAMI TRL E, OCHOPEE, FL 34141 TRACTS 118 AND 119 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF 4545.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF200 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN NORTHEASTERLY FOR A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90° RUN SOUTHEASTERLY FOR A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 900 RUN SOUTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 01407060_1 Page I of I Packet Pg. 3295 17.B.b y TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (EDDY) �— Z /� 1/,1 --4� _ y _ — _ / y O 0 0I n X SEMINOLE TRAIL GOVERNMENT CENTER PREPARED FOR D o SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA OCHOPEE FL MASTER CONCEPT PLAN SEE SHEET C-1038 FOR CONTINUATION Exhibit B 1 of 3 Ta- n 59351 Kimley>>)Horn - oE, AxE .ssaa.res. iac. lJJ uH�uaa� i Oq Ctlfu E..BILS R JJ�N oHt: >Es-E>s cm w.w.ciuur-uoan.<au c� Eaaaaean Packet Pg. 3296 1 17.B.b ll 4 - I mA = cn I I my ti ti I I 00 o Z ox I I A I I m I I A I p I I O I I JC Z > 10.0' SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I1R LIMITS OF PRESERVE ') I I I I I I n X SEMINOLE TRAIL GOVERNMENT CENTER PREPARED FOR SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA OCHOPEE FL SEE SHEET C-103A FOR CONTINUATION m0 Z 0 mo 01. Wo��� v' F<Tl Ozm o �� 0 Z II(L L s I o° �I �•, �\ A p.0 �n / D / m �z _ py/ c T m I i I ZO0 I I A�N I N Imo m Og _ I zz mmm �mr;i rAiA mi vmmS3 msm 0m-120 D [A I I —.. z1AA yG�Z CA I N OO Or CAf�f Z A Z O D I. 0Sk>m;omm I I.. 29A�pAm I rm n O> mmo 0' O Qy m.1�7 �rDTNmm �'1I I O i ooA mp Zmy�v�o I I Gi ;uv K>ooa y;wm Nyr 0omr� M� Z;�XX JO nZ mm WOr �p ♦1 z -V L... N O .D A O O m mm O cn o p r+ >Z I I � I � v I pp C +L ------------------------------�-- N LAND USE: CONSERVATION TO PROPERTIES ABUTTING ZONING: CONSERVATION ACSC/ST N MASTER CONCEPT PLAN Exhibit B 2of3 BERTO R HERRERA, P.E. Kimley>» Horn iu[[Y-HCBH , •55CG� AR MC. JSJ �u�wBv�RGBPH '..lii[ -" WBN G�BIFJ, [L JJi.N n �5935] • BHauc Jas-e J-RORs www..iuur-HBRH.cou� U 0000mae Cn N N Packet Pg. 3297 17.B.b n a vji CC z Z in a+ v? '^ to fl D3 ; 0O p �" 3 Z CC: p D 3 3 C 6 m 3 Z 3 j` 3 Z 3 Z o 3 3 D c_ 6 2 I/T t'f a v 3 0 3 � v o w o a as m R 3 _ O y D rm- z Z Z f D o 2�2 °, O T O O tin N F+ lWl� O_ O p o � d O O 0 O a� f c v N v o o O w � o m o. OR m A V LA N T V W+ V (JT A :I N O» N A O N F^ LA T T A o� o v O v C I N Q o D N 00 L G p 0 m o m rn R to � ;e O G) m m p = C n m C m S v z V1 rn m A C m m v NJ z ul o a 0 0 0 0 N Z z z S z C cZi O O �o N A O � z��„ -DI W N O O p v cZi v cZi cn o v cZn n n y v z O O Fn'T vm+ A m o O v v V N II � o u fO v � D a N A N N t0 A (A En En LA D D D D n m m (mn m Ln Lm 0 0 � m m Vf O w m D z zOD0 0--00�u �0OZ��CCCO0�Z=D nr- r-=ZD�UKF7 0M D�UcnK ODr OCn0-m �mO<m�DC)0 D mm XO-{r DO<Cz�nrGfrTl- U�ZJ�� ) -U Cm mn D���M r-1;Um�CnLn I�U)DZJCO ZDJ ( F— f<T1--- a)n ZJDD zr�fl O -i O D r- <= � CD 0D m=���� )>QS m< D�� OZO-{r��Z>nr��-Fri mX D-{=�r-O D m0�0 Oz --CK00 Fri mmp����z0F9C/7. =zDOOC�z�� 0rD� oz 0-r-iD< 0 m= m � � m D O z m Cn O D = m DCn n m mD m m 0 r- 0 m z -T� o Cu z -i z- tom: rm D m< m � 0 m0 z z0 m m m Z W- O v O N T m n mZ y D m LA ;0 m W --I Z � --j < O N C m cn v-<m O N .. m Z m C �' D n0 C Z cn o D W cn Z O W N n M N A N � Z O O m D;O N N D< 0 N O n N - -� N o0 q 00 w LMA n z 0 w 4' o D � Z 00 D Z m m O D n v rl z .. cn o N vmi o N z n I m (A Exhibit B 3of3 v O 7 03 C z C) O C --I r z m n SEMINOLE TRAIL oA Ems` aR motto K °°'2'9°°' Kimle »> Horn GOVERNMENT CENTER MASTER CONCEPT 03 I9 2019 AkRTOP HERRERA P.E. y O c PREPARED FOR AS L. .- Ham 'Hn .ssac.¢.us . w � NOTES P. u.ww.R. n n SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA u°u H sys -HwH. oaooeos OCHOPEE FL —D. Pn. ____ n m m m z b m Z � � r r z m m O O D v D a Packet Pg. 3298 17.B.b Exhibit C — Conditions of Approval 1. The Conditional Use is not effective until the Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida under 380.032(3), FS is fully executed, and no other development orders will be approved until said execution. 2. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 25 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 3. Architecture shall be similar to the image depicted on the Main Entrance Rendering (Sheet A-900) by Bermello Ajamil & Partners dated 10-19-2018, attached as Exhibit D. 4. Design of the septic system will be determined based on final building size and daily staffing and operations, in accordance with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requirements at the time of SDP. Washing of vehicles would be considered industrial waste and would need to be reviewed by FDEP for the how disposal of this water will be handled. 5. Excavation shall be monitored by a certified archeologist. In accordance with Land Development Code Section 2.03.07.E.2.ii, activity shall immediately stop and protective procedures must be followed if, during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity, an historic or archaeological artifact, or other indicator is found. 6. All outdoor lighting must be held to the minimum necessary for security and safety in accordance with state and federal guidelines for listed species. 7. The Developer shall adhere to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Black Bear Management Plan, as applicable, at the time of PPL/SDP approval. ['19-CPS-01942/1726975/1] Packet Pg. 3299 I 17.B.b I Exhibit D r N 0 N N >Mmcl 9 � Fcu `� o;u z Oz � j K pm A m Z �m O 8 r° £ § Y' D G') g- -r �m � o og m' 3 Packet Pg. 3300 Z - I 17.B.c I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PER TITLE SEARCH REPORT) SHEET 1 OF lIl TRACTS 118 AND 119 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, II FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TITLE SEARCH REPORT TABLE COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W CASTLE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SEARCH EFFECTIVE LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF 4545.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE APRIL 1, 2019 AT 11100 PM CONTINUE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90° RUN NORTHEASTERLY FOR A INSTRUMEN DESCRIPTION REC❑RDING AFFECT PLOTTED DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90° RUN SOUTHEASTERLY T TYPE DATA S FOR A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90° RUN SOUTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. O.R.B. LEGAL FOUND 5/8' IR❑N ROD & CAP FOUND 5/8' IR❑N ROD & CAP WARRANTY 4776, LB#6680 200.00' LB# 569 _ DEED DEED PG,1255, YES DESC, + B.C.R. SHOWN 69r 69, 6 >. +6,8 +6• T W 17 _ 88 1 9 it +69 a, D� ❑UL, GAS, + ��' TW18 00 MINERAL OR D.B. 30, NO COVERS m AGREEMENT OTHER PG,106, YES ENTIRE TW16 ' + # RESERVATION B.C.R. SITE 62 90, S y �9 5,1'x PALM TREE TRACT 118 �- 6 I y ABBREVIATIONS: HEIGHT IN FEET 6, I'D + + TW19 R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE c �• ��' I' HWY HIGHWAY SYMBOL LEGEND p + I P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT POWER POLE P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING 00 0 � TRACT 119 I CBS CONCRETE BLOCK N + C_ ANCHOR N I STRUCTURE V + WETLAND + a, N _ + i F.FL.EL. FINISHED FLOOR PALM TREE c 16 + _ Q ELEVATION m AS MARKED BY + a KIMLEY-H❑RN & ASSOC,, INC. z �TW15 ' o I GRAVEL a' CENTERLINE STRANGLER FIG r DATED JULY 2018 DRIVEWAY TW DELINEATION FLAGS c 61 + Q I SHW SEASONAL HIGH ,o L, 6>- w Q 10"-15' TREE E + 1 V) 3 I WATER LOCATION c N + � TW14-17, ' I WETLANDS + +' + + ~ I i ADDRESS: DELINEATION (7 61 + TWg EAS❑NAL HIGIt �' I TW20 57257 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST -CANOPY + 7,2' o DIAMETER IN FEET L TER MARK #2 m +� 8 0.6' TRUNK DIAMETER TW7 ` o +6'a �;_ _ _ _ SURVEYOR'S NOTES: IN INCHES o co o �� TW13 6'X CHAIN 18"-15' + �� + LINK +9 co SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS NOT ABSTRACTED BY THIS FIRM E s,9' o I TW9 . + � FENCE �" + FOR EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAY, RESERVATIONS OR in 0 l � 5,4'X7,4' + OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD, AND OWNERSHIP WAS NOT o 61 CD `� �/ 4 ATERH PUMP❑USE as m 2.1' TW2IDETERMINED. c + ' +TW10� 56,3' SCALE OF SOME FEATURES MAY BE EXAGGERATED FOR o ro i6 TW11�2' 8 56,8 CLARITY. o ip N r + + + F❑NCRETE c6 BURIED FOUNDATIONS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, IF N 3,4' 422,8' + ANY, NOT SHOWN.00 d Ip - G�5 + e� ELEVATION NOTE: o t.s' _ w Pq l CONCRETE + ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERIC�AN VERTICAL +' w Q Ln ������� DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88), SHOWN THUS:X-155 IL ' JO o . 8'_AND ARE BASED ON NGS POINT J 248, DESCRIBED AS _ z �C7 �� 0 F ° o FOLLOWS: BECHMARK DISK SET IN TOP OF CONCRETE Y ' U �F�' n 18"-15' o MONUMENT AND STAMPED J 248 1965 LOCATED ABOUT o TW22 0 14.25 MILES EAST ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 41 FROM THE N -j ¢ ? '� a 8' CD JUNCTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 94 THE DADE-COLLIER +40 8 34,0' COUNTY LINE, 0.2 MILE NORTHWEST OF HIGHWAY BRIDGE C11CD Li + '3! + 125,2' + NO. 117, 144 FEET SOUTHEAST OF A DRIVE LEDING N Q Q TW5 NORTHEAST ACROSS THE TAMIAMI CANAL, 24.5 FEET cwi 3 8' NORTHEAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE HIGHWAY, 7 n + 15' FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE SOUTHWEST EDGE OF THE L >, .+ 10' co TW23 CANAL, 1.5 FEET SOUTHEAST OF A METAL WITNESS POST, a�+9 +�11 1 ABOUT LEVEL WITH THE HIGHWAY AND SET IN THE TOP OF ;v �10 9 ++ ' A CONCRETE POST PROJECTING 0.3 FOOT. a 10' + J + 6++55' GRAVEL ROAD ELEVATION = 8.53' (NAVD88) i z a3 a4'+ i SURVEY CERTIFICATION: p = Q II- aka+ ++83 Cn + Q I v o J THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE 10"-15' I w ° w ELECTRIC SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE m LO oN co �� POST 8' WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS ❑UND 5/8" TOP OF BANK FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS JOINTLY ESTABLISHED c IRON ROD FOUND 5/8" AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, & CAP 'WATER'S 10, FENCE IR❑N ROD & CAP TW 2, 3, 4, 6, 7a, 7b, AND 8 ON TABLE A THEREOF. c LB#6680 METAL LB#6680 W4 EDGE 10' METAL POST 10' 26' NORTH THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON JULY 27th, 2019. 26' NORTH TW3 TW1 �� 6' TW25 8'­, co IL N �/ W2 & oY o Q N �TW26 �_� + w EAST LINE OF >+ + + "- � ,' 8 v \ SECTION 36, 9 TOP OF 9 8S 8, a� +5e o P. ❑ B. TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH y � 4 BANK+5,9� a' + o � r cu > + 4�'+ TW27 +2' rP'+ 2,2'+ cu RANGE 34 EAST h o 2,9' ++2,8 ti + �g + R +e i 35 �0 / + 'a o= + 200,00 + °' 6, + 2,9'+ s,�' NORTHEASTERLY Q- o +S +2,6, 6' 8, . 66' S6 e q \ RIGHT-OF-WAY a4 9- s a �' P,❑,C, \ LINE OF U.S. 6\� s 9 SOUTHEAST HIGHWAY 41 3 F9.2 9 .9 w s 8' 2s' (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) N 3' t 2, Q, 9 9 9 CORNER OF 92 GUARD 9 00- '- N 9 °' 9 r: SECTION 36, g0� 5' RAIL s9.TAMIAMI TR ILUARD RAIL 96 s9, GRAPHIC SCALE a• 5 / TOWNSHIP NCRM - + 20 40 8( Q ASPHALT 3- WA R'S s 53 SOUTH rPAVEMENTs (U.S.�7HWY 41) SET 60D NAIL EDGE 9 RANGE 34 EAST 9�9 SKETCH OF BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 1 C IN FEET INCH = 40 FEET 2 r 6/27/19 ADD SEASONAL HIGH WATER MARKS LP MR 6/27/19 ADD TITLE SEARCH REPORT TABLE LP MR RATE R E V I S I❑ N S RwN cHK. CERTIFIED TO: S.T.O.F. HOLDINGS, LTD., A I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THMVEY MEETS STANDARDS OF Q LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA I FLORDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSUANT TO SECTION 472,027, TAMIAMI GOVERNMENT CENTER, 57257 US-41 FLORDA STATUTES, DATED THIS 29th DAY OFJUNE 2018 A.D. OCHOPEE, FL. (PARCEL NUMBER: 01238680000) MARTIN P. ROSSI M[ LLERN'�'LEGG PROFESSI❑NAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE OF REGISTRATION South Florida Office: 5747 N. Andrews Way y HEWmG57O NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL THFLORIDATTHE RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATIONi LB6680 Ft. Lauderdale Florida • 33309-2364 954-436-7000•Fax: 954-436-8664 PROJECT NO E E NO DRAWN BY: LP CHECKED BY: MR www.millerlegg.com 18-00038 SH-1 V,\PROJECTS\2018\18-00038 - 57257 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST\18-00038_TS,DWG 7/11/19 by MROSSI Packet Pg. 3301 17.B.e AGREEMENT REGARDING A SEMINOLE TRIBE GOVERNMENT SERVICES BUILDING WITHIN THE BIG CYPRESS AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN UNDER SECTION 380.032(3), FLORIDA STATUTES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between Collier County ("County") and the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity ("DEO"). The County and DEO may each individually be referred to herein as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties". RECITALS WHEREAS, DEO is the state land planning agency having the power and duty to exercise general supervision of the administration and enforcement of the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act of 1972 ("Act"), which includes provisions relating to designated Areas of Critical State Concern; and WHEREAS, DEO is authorized by section 380.032(3), Florida Statutes, to enter into agreements with any landowner, developer, or governmental agency as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions and purposes of the Act or any rules promulgated thereunder; and WHEREAS, the County is a governmental agency, as defined by the Act, and a portion of the County is within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, as designated by Section 380.055, Florida Statutes, and which is regulated by Rules 28-25.001 — 28-25.016, Florida Administrative Code; and WHEREAS, the Seminole Tribe of Florida has brought to the attention of DEO and Collier County that members of the Seminole Tribe of Florida who reside and use the region in and around the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern lack ready access to information regarding governmental services including public safety and medical care, lack an emergency hurricane 01406842-2 Page 1 of 7 May 16, 2022 CAS IPacket Pg. 3302 17.B.e shelter, and lack community meeting space and cultural training facilities, among other uses ("Government Services"); and WHEREAS, DEO and Collier County recognize that there are limited properties in private ownership within or near the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern that have been previously developed and that could support a facility for the provision of Government Services to Seminole Tribe members; and WHEREAS, DEO and Collier County recognize that the Property would be difficult to develop as contemplated by the Seminole Tribe for Government Services under a strict application of the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Regulations in Rule 28-25, Florida Administrative Code; and WHEREAS, the purposes of the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act of 1972 and the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern include protection of natural resources and the environment (§§ 380.021 and 380.055, Fla. Stat., and Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-25.002); and WHEREAS, rule 28-25.011, Florida Administrative Code, provides that the use of local variance procedures shall apply to the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, provided however, that no variance shall be granted unless such development is designed, consistent with Big Cypress Area regulations, to have minimum adverse impact on the Area's water storage capacity, surface water and estuarine fisheries; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code provide that this Agreement shall serve as the variance procedure for properties within the Area of Critical State Concern, allowing the State and Collier County to ensure that the intent of the controlling statutes and rules are met; and 01406842-2 Page 2 of 7 May 16, 2022 Cp'O Packet Pg. 3303 17.B.e WHEREAS, the County finds that this Agreement provides the minimum standards making possible the reasonable use of the Property for Government Services, and that this Agreement is consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan and in compliance with the County's Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, DEO and the County desire to clarify and establish the proper application of the variance procedures in the Big Cypress Area by providing the appropriate scope of development of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, DEO and the County agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein and are essential elements hereof. 2. Area Affected. This Agreement shall apply to the Property as more specifically described on Exhibit "A". 3. Maximum Development. A development order which authorizes up to the following development on the Property ("Maximum Development") shall be an appropriate variance under Rule 28-25.011, Florida Administrative Code: Any and all land development permits for site alteration, including dredging and filling, to permit the construction of a Government Services building, allowing a maximum of 50,000 square feet of site alteration, 38,000 square feet of impermeable surface, and 15,000 square feet of building floor area under air. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no more than 62.38% of the Property acreage may be altered, and nonpermeable surfaces may only comprise up to 76% of said altered area (i.e., 47.4% of the Property acreage). 4. Variance Applicability. 01406R42-2 Page 3 of 7 May 16, 2022 L as 6 c E 0 0 W M 0 0 O 0 rn 0 N J a. a� a. a� 0 N N an N N CN o Packet Pg. 3304 17.B.e a. As it relates to DEO, this Agreement and the Maximum Development limitations provided herein, shall serve as a variance from the following regulation: i. Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-25.006(1), Site Alteration b. As it relates to the County, this Agreement and the Maximum Development limitations provided herein, shall serve as a variance from the following regulations: i. Collier County Growth Management Plan: 1. Future Land Use Element; Future Land Use Designation Description Section; V. Overlays and Special Features; A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay; 1. Site Alteration 2. Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Policy 6.2.3(2) ii. Collier County Land Development Code; Section 4.02.14(C). 5. Development Orders. Any future development order for the Property shall be rendered to DEO in accordance with section 380.07, Florida Statutes. Nothing herein limits DEO's authority to review any future development order, including any order related to the Property, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Consistent with the requirements of rule 28-25.011, F.A.C., any future development order for the Property shall require development permitted thereunder be designed to have minimum adverse impact on Big Cypress Area's water storage capacity, surface water and estuarine fisheries, and the applicant shall have the affirmative burden of establishing that the development will not have an adverse impact on such resources. 6. Preservation of Wetlands. The County shall ensure all development orders for the Property shall require, as a condition of their issuance, to the extent possible consistent with the Maximum Development permitted in paragraph 3, the preservation of any remaining wetlands on the site and 01406842-2 Page 4 of 7 May 16, 2022 C,No Packet Pg. 3305 17.B.e a stormwater control system that mimics the historic water flow, as may be allowed consistent with any applicable rules, regulations, and permit requirements. 7. Entirety of Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire and exclusive understanding and agreement among the Parties and may not be modified in any manner except by an instrument in writing and signed by the Parties to this Agreement. 8. Duplicate Originals. This Agreement may be executed in any number of originals, all of which evidence one agreement, and only one of which need be produced for any purpose. 9. Enforcement. In the event of a breach of this Agreement or failure to comply with any condition of it or if it has been based upon materially inaccurate information, DEO may enforce the County's compliance with this Agreement as provided in sections 380.07 and 380.11, Florida Statutes. 10. Scope of Authority. This Agreement is not intended to influence or determine the authority or decisions of any state or local government or agency other than the Parties in issuance of any permits or approvals that might be required by federal, state, or local laws and regulations for any development contemplated by this Agreement. 11. No Third -Party Rights. No property owner or developer shall incur any obligations or make changes in position in reliance on any terms of this Agreement. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof or agreement or provision included herein by reference shall operate or be construed as being for the benefit of any person or entity not a Party hereto, or grant a third party a right to enforce this Agreement. 12. Date of Execution. The date of execution of this Agreement shall be the date that the last party signs and acknowledges this Agreement. 01406842.2 Page 5 of 7 May 16, 2022 CPO Packet Pg. 3306 17.B.e IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties by and through their respective undersigned duly authorized representatives have executed this Agreement on the dates and year below written BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman Date: Attest: Crystal K. Kinzel, Clerk By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Assistant County Attorney FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY M. , Director Division of Community Development Date: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency, subject only to full and proper execution by the Parties. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Approved Date: 01406842-2 Page 6 of 7 May 16, 2022 a� 0 c E 0 0 c� M O O O O r 0 N J a. c 0 r as a. a� c 0 N N 6� N N GNO Packet Pg. 3307 17.B.e EXHIBIT A — Property Description Parcel No.: 01238680000 Site Address: 57257 TAMIAMI TRL E, OCHOPEE, FL 34141 TRACTS 118 AND 119 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 N WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 RUN NORTHWESTERLY a ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF 4545.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHWESTERLY G ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF200 FEET, a TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN NORTHEASTERLY FOR A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90° RUN SOUTHEASTERLY FOR A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING N TO THE RIGHT 900 RUN SOUTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CD N N N 01406842-2 Page 7 of 7 May 16, 2022 00 Packet Pg. 3308 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT Or POSTING N0110E S110U1.1) BE. RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF eOtttEIt• I Aug BBdc II BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED L7ff M WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE OLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER 01,1 00003G0 3Ga -r 2�gh � A-4 : -We Ifoo SIGNNTURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX S� &kN NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) %AIC r per, Xctf . a�` 3341 >, CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF� The forego' instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this � day of �J� I r lt° 20 by , personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. NATALIE LEWIS F Notary Public - State of Florida ®` Commission # HH 057364 orn My Comm. Expires Oct 26, 2024 Bonded through National Notary Assn. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) 1k-� Signature of Notary Public Nja-f .(,c,¢, (4,a i 5 Printed Name of Notary Public V 0 E m rn a a) r rn 0 IL _ _ N E s 0 r a Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 3309 I Packet Pg. 3310 1 17.B.g NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9..00 A.M. on September 13, 2022, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY SERVICES AND RELATED GOVERNMENT USES AS AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE IN THE CONSERVATION ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN AND SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (CON-ACSC/ST) PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.09.B.1.c.2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE PROPERTY IS 1.83s ACRES AND IS DESCRIBED AS LOTS 18 AND 19 OF PAOLITA ACRES, AN UNRECORDED SUBDIVISION, AND IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US 41) APPROXIMATELY .85 MILES FROM COLLIER COUNTY'S EASTERN BOUNDARY IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PL20190000360] d _ da > Dade R , County Pro1jOCt Loat on lF 7*1 Monroe County A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of three Q weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-countylvisitors/calendar-of- events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting, Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore; may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office BOARD OF COUNTY"COMMISSIONERS .COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COUR'T'B.COMPTROLLr;R By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-GC10928954-01 .- r N ra N CV Packet Pg. 3311 Codj�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: CONDITIONAL USE LDC Section 10.08.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑■ A CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ❑ A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER Name of Property Owner(s): APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION STOF Holdings LLC (f/k/a S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd.) Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 6300 Stirling Road city: Hollywood State: FL ZIP: 33024 Telephone: Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: FabianLefler@semtribe.com Name of Agent(s): Tara D u hy, Esq . Firm: Lewis, Longman & Walker, PA Address: 515 N Flagler Drive, Ste.15000ity: W. Palm Beach State: FL ZIP: 33401 Telephone. 561-640-0820 Cell• Fax. 561-640-0820 E-Mail Address: TDuhy@LLW-LAW.com; SBehn@LLW-LAW.com BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 5/08/2018 Page 1 of 12 Cotb�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ASSOCIATIONS 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: N/A Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: City: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION On separate page, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: 01238680000 Plat Book: NSA Page #: Section/Township/Range: 36 / 53 S / 34E Subdivision: NSA Lot: 118-119 Block: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached Size of Property: 400 ft. X 200 ft. = 80,000 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 1.83 Ac. Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 57257 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, FL 34141; On the North side of Tamiami Trail approximately 0.85 miles from Collier County's eastern boundary. 5/08/2018 Page 2 of 12 Cotb�-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning land Use N Conservation - ACSC/ST Conservation / ACSC S Conservation - ACSC/ST Conservation / ACSC E Conservation - ACSC/ST Conservation / ACSC W Conservation - ACSC/ST Conservation / ACSC If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on a separate page) Section/Township/Range: _/_/ Lot: Block: Plat Book: Page # Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Property I.D. Number: CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use as allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the Conservation Zoning district for Essential Services (type of use). Present Use of the Property: Vacant residential 5/08/2018 Page 3 of 12 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code, staff's recommendation to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. On a separate page, provide a narrative statement describing a request for a conditional use and a detailed response to the criteria listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistent with each of the criteria. a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. d. Describe the site's and the proposed use's compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? None. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑■ No ❑ Yes (If yes please provide copies.) 5/08/2018 Page 4 of 12 Cotb�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATIOP Name ofApplicant(s): STOF Holdings LLC (f/k/a S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd.) Address: 6300 Stirling Road City: Hollywood State: Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: FabianLefler( Fax: semtribe.com FL ZIP:33024 Address of Subject Property (if available): 57257 Tamiami Trail East City: Ochopee State: FL ZIP: 34141 EGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: 36 / 53S / 34E Lot: 118-119 Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: N/A Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached Check applicable system: 01238680000 rPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL i u BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name:. d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System X❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System d. Private System (Well) ❑ PROVIDE NAME X❑ Total Population to be served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily: 5/08/2018 Page 5 of 12 Cotb�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. A 900 Gallon septic tank is provided on the site. County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 5/08/2018 Page 6 of 12 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of F.S. §695. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the assigned Principal Planner, Zoning Services Department, within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 5/08/2018 Page 7 of 12 C;O er Co1.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www_.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals ❑ A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Chapter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. Requirements for Review Copies Required Not Required Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ® ❑ Cover letter briefly explaining the project 1 Pre -Application Notes 1 Affidavit of Authorizationsigned and notarized 1 ® ❑ _Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ® ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 ® ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 1 Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 Yz X 11 copy) ❑ Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required ❑ Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required ❑ 77 Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by County regulations, if required ❑ � F1 ❑ Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and character, if required ❑ El ❑ Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 1 ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 r ❑ Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1Li Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearing. ❑ D Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Li Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 1 Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans * Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ❑ * If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 5/08/2018 Page 8 of 12 CAT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.col_liergy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Planners: Indicate if the Petition needs to be routed to the followine additional rpvipwprr- ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ GMD Graphics ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Other: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Communication Towers: Mosquito Control Collier County Airport Authority Naples Airport Authority Commercial M 5/08/2018 Page 9 of 12 CAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieraov.net FEE REQUIREMENTS 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners `)( Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the a plication is filed within 9 months of pre -application meeting) `l Conditional Use Application Fee: $4,000.00 // o When filed with Rezone Petition: $1,500.00 o Additional fee for 511 and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $300.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined atJ pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Fee, if required: Methodology Review Fee: $500.00 et f IV&,&D ?Woo o Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00 ptv vpw o Major Study Review Fee: $1,500.00 CI Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Hearing Examiner or CCPC: $1,125.00 El Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the BZA, if required: $500.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The complet pplication, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 nt/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date 5/08/2018 Page 10 of 12 Cotb�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Public Participation Requirements LDC Section 10.03.06 B. or C. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code Notice for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the Hearing Examiner's receipt of the staff report and application materials in accordance with the applicable sections of the Administrative Code. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: • Date, time, and location of the hearing; • Description of the proposed land uses; and • 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date. Public Hearing for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. See Chapter 9 of the Administrative Code for the Office of the Hearing Examiner procedures. Notice for Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the advertised public hearing. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. 5/08/2018 Page 11 of 12 Cotb�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: • Date, time, and location of the hearing; • Description of the proposed land uses; and • 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing date. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Petitions Environmental Advisory Committee (EAQ The EAC shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing, if required. Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC): The CCPC shall hold at least 1 public hearing. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): The BZA shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. 5/08/2018 Page 12 of 12 Project Narrative Seminole Tribe of Florida's Government Services Building Site Development Plan and Conditional Use SDP — PL20190000223 CU — PL20190000360 I. Introduction — History of the Seminole Indians in South Florida The Seminole Tribe of Florida is a sovereign Indian Tribe with a rich and diverse heritage. The Seminoles are justly proud of their independence and self-reliance, having survived the violent assimilating forces that threatened to destroy all Indian communities in the United States. In the past one hundred years, the Seminole Tribe's industry has grown from hunting, fishing, and trapping, to selling crafts and operating roadside tourist attractions, to now owning and operating a world-renowned international hospitality brand. The challenge the Seminoles now face is how to maintain their unique culture, in the face of the pressures placed upon them by the mainstream economy and the corroding influences of popular culture. One of the most powerful tools that the Seminoles have in this modern battle is their connection to the land, where they have resided for generations. In Florida, the Seminole Tribe's engagement with the land extends far beyond the borders of the federal reservation lands that have been set aside for them. This fact is acknowledged in both Federal and State laws which describe and protect the Seminoles' rights to continue their usual and customary use and occupancy throughout the south Florida region. Those rights extend into the Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades National Park. In 1928, Tamiami Trail was completed, bisecting the Everglades and connecting the east and west coasts of Florida. During the period that followed, scores of Tribal members relocated near the Trail to sell native crafts, create tourist camps, and put on shows for the public. As a result of both this trend and their natural dispersal throughout the region, numerous "homesites" were established in proximity to Tamiami Trail, where Tribal members continue to reside. In 1974, Federal Public Law 93-440 created the Big Cypress National Preserve. The Preserve contains over 729,000 acres, and more than one-half million of those acres are located in Collier County. Members of the Seminole Tribe, Miccosukee Tribe, and "Independent" Indians live, hunt, and fish throughout the Preserve. This Federal Law recognizes the Indians' rights to continue to reside and conduct their traditional way of life in the Preserve. The Seminole Tribe maintains governmental facilities on the Big Cypress Indian Reservation and in the City of Hollywood. The Big Cypress Indian Reservation lies at the northern end of the Big Cypress National Preserve. However, there is no direct north -south link between the Reservation and Tamiami Trail, making travel to the reservation onerous for Tribal members living along the Trail. The distance to Hollywood from the Tribe member's homes along Tamiami Trail is similarly problematic. II. Need for Access to Basic Governmental Services 01406979-4 The Tribal Council, the governing body of the Seminole Tribe, has recognized a growing need to provide access to various basic governmental services to the Tribal members that live in the Tamiami Trail region. These services include ready access to information regarding public safety, basic medical services, community meeting space, and hurricane shelter access. Due to the remoteness of the homes of the Tribal members along Tamiami Trail, significant health, safety and general welfare concerns cannot be easily addressed. Beginning in the early 2000s, members of the Tribe's real estate staff began looking for property along Tamiami Trail that could support a governmental services building. This proved to be challenging, as the vast majority of the land in this region is owned by governmental entities for preservation and conservation. The difficulty is exacerbated by the sensitive and unique ecological habitat that comprises the majority of the Big Cypress National Preserve. Finally, the site needed to be large enough to support the basic government functions desired. III. Subject Property In 2012, the Seminole Tribe staff located and purchased a parcel of property on the north side of Tamiami Trail, near Collier County's eastern boundary. The property is located at 57257 Tamiami Trail, and contains approximately 1.83 acres (hereinafter, the "Subject Property"). The Subject Property was purchased from Jacqueline Glover, who owned the property since at least 1976. A REDI map aerial from 1977 attached herewith shows the site was largely cleared and developed with a home at that time. The Subject Property is owned by STOF Holdings, LLC, formerly known as S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd. The Seminole Tribe of Florida is the owner of STOF Holdings, LLC. The managers of the LLC are one in the same with the Tribal Council. The Subject Property has several advantages that made it attractive to the Seminole Tribe. In addition to remaining in private ownership, the site has been largely filled and developed since at least 1977. The Subject Property is also located in an advantageous location for the Tribe, roughly equidistant to both coasts, and central to the community that lives proximate to Tamiami Trail. A recent environmental survey of the Subject Property revealed that there are approximately 0.7 acres of wetlands remaining on the site, with the remaining +/- 1.1 acres previously cleared and filled. This cleared area permits the development of the site with only very limited impacts to existing wetlands (less than 0.3 acres.) The development proposes the restoration of .1 acres of previously impacted wetland habitat, with .407 acres being placed under a conservation easement, and an additional .065 acres of wetlands retained within the 10' conservation area setback. IV. Regulatory Authority The Subject Property lies within unincorporated Collier County and is subject to the County's Land Use and Zoning regulations. The Collier County Growth Management Plan ("GMP") indicates a future land use of "Conservation" for the Subject Property. The zoning designation is similarly Conservation ("CON"). The site is also within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State 01406979-4 2 Concern Special Treatment Overlay ("ACSC-ST"). In addition to the zoning requirements, the Collier County Land Development Code ("LDC") contains additional relevant environmental regulations regarding the use of the site. The County's Area of Critical State Concern regulations are drawn from Florida Statute and the Florida Administrative Code rules which established this protection area and the basic rules regulating development within the region. Florida Statutes Section 380.55, titled "The Big Cypress Conservation Act of 1973", established the boundaries of the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern; an area dominated by the Big Cypress National Preserve. The Preserve is almost entirely owned by state and federal agencies. Florida Administrative Code Chapter 28-25 provides the State's regulations for the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. The stated purpose under the Code is to conserve and protect the natural, environmental and economic resources and the scenic beauty of the Big Cypress area. The regulations contained therein are intended to "provide a land and water management system that will preserve water quality, provide for the optimum utilization of the limited water resources of the area, facilitate orderly and well -planned development, and protect the health, welfare, safety and quality of life of the residents of the state." (F.A.C. 28-25.002). Site development will be subject to State and Federal environmental permitting as further detailed in the Natural Resource Assessment, included in the submittal to the County. V. Proposed Development and Use As noted, the goal of the project is the development of a Governmental Services building to serve the Seminole Tribe of Florida's Tribal Members that live on or near Tamiami Trail. To that end, the Tribe assembled a development team to design a facility that will accommodate their anticipated needs in the region. In addition to meeting the Tribe's needs, the design goals include an effort to locate the development envelope within the previously developed portions of the Subject Property, to the greatest extent possible. Retention and conservation of the higher -quality wetlands on the site is also a priority, and wetland restoration is to be carried out where possible. The proposed structure is a two-story multi -function building containing office space, meeting rooms, and a larger multi -purpose room. The total square -footage under air is 14,712 square feet. The site will include 44 parking spaces. Landscaping is consistent with the County's LDC, while remaining cognizant of the important surrounding ecological environment. The LDC required buffers will be provided along the right-of-way and property boundaries. The building's architecture will meet the County's design standards, and is considerate of the low -scale context of the immediate surroundings and the natural environment. The building will allow for routine and specialized health, safety, and cultural programming. While the Tribe does not have public safety jurisdiction in this area, their programming includes training, information sessions, and direct assistance on matters of security, fire safety, and personal welfare. In addition, a variety of health and human services are regularly provided on a scheduled or as -needed basis for Tribe members. 01406979-4 3 The use of the property during business hours will typically be 4 to 7 full time Tribal Government Employees that work and coordinate the programs for Tribal members along the Trail. On a weekly basis also during business hours, additional staff or contracted professionals will utilize the building for a variety of services, including physical and mental health, counseling, safety and security programming, elder care, family support, youth groups, and cultural studies and activities. These activities would bring the utilization of the building to approximately 30-40 staff and Tribal Members seeking services. The primary use of the facility outside of business hours is for the monthly Trail Community Meeting, during which general governmental issues and items of concern to the community are discussed, and special presentations are given. These events typically have a total of 40 Tribal Members and Staff in attendance, while a maximum of 60 people was utilized for building planning purposes. The most important, albeit infrequent, proposed and designed use is as a hurricane shelter for the local Tribal members. The building will be built to hurricane standards, and a permanent generator will be located on the property. The estimated maximum Tribal population that could require localized sheltering in the foreseeable future is 100 people. The building's "Multi -Purpose Shelter Room" will meet the majority of the sheltering needs. The Florida 2018 Statewide Emergency Shelter Plan standard is 20 square feet per person for the general population. The proposed "Shelter Room" contains 1,904 square feet, giving it a maximum capacity of 95 people during a sheltering event. The 2018 Shelter Plan also recommends 60 square feet for anyone with special needs. The "Break Room" on the first floor of the building contains 549 square feet, and can thus accommodate 9 special needs members. Additional space in the building can be utilized as needed for individual situations. VI. Required Development Approvals The Subject Property will require approval of the site development plan by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. In addition, the proposed Governmental Services use is classified as a "Conditional Use" by the LDC, requiring review by the Planning Commission and final approval by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Government Services building has been located in conformity with all County dimensional standards, including height, setbacks, and lot coverage requirements. The parking provided is based upon an analysis of the function and unique nature of the use, as discussed in detail below. The development will also require relief from the Area of Critical State Concern ("ACSC") regulations, as found in the Florida Administrative Code, and reiterated in the County's LDC. VII. Area of Critical State Concern Standards under Agreement with State 014W9794 4 The State rules permit a variance from the ACSC regulations, which the County may implement through an "Agreement pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3), F.S." (Collier County Growth Management Plan, Future Land Use Element, Sec. V.A.; Collier County LDC § 4.02.14.A.) To that end, the Seminole Tribe has coordinated with the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and Collier County in the drafting of an agreement for approval by the State and County. The typical ACSC standard requires site alteration be limited to 10% of the total site size, and non -permeable areas to only occupy half of that 10%. Due to the relatively small nature of the Subject Property, the ACSC regulations would unduly restrict the Tribe's ability to develop the necessary structure. However, by arranging the proposed development almost entirely on the portions of the property that have been cleared and developed for at least 40 years, there is extremely limited loss of habitat and virtually no impact to the surrounding hydrology. Under the proposed agreement between the State and Collier County, a maximum of 50,000 square feet of site alteration is permitted (62.38% of the site), 38,000 square feet of impermeable surface (76% of the altered area, or 47.4% of the overall site area), and 15,000 square feet of building area. (These numbers slightly exceed the current site plan approval, to account for minor modifications that may occur through the permitting and construction process.) The majority of the high -quality wetlands on the site are to be preserved and placed into conservation. The development of the site is largely focused within the previously developed portions of the property. A conservation easement will be placed over the wetlands on the site, with an additional 10' setback area of undisturbed wetlands between the conservation area boundary and the developed areas of the project. The conservation area, plus setback area, contains a total of .475 acres of wetlands, of which .10 acres will consist of restored wetlands from an area previously fled. The area protected by the conservation easement will contain 17,725 sq. ft of wetlands (Al acres / 22.2% of the overall site). The conservation area setback contains 2,843 sq. ft. of wetlands (.065 acres / 3.6% of the overall site). VIII. Standards for Site Development Approval LDC Sec. 10.02.03 provides the standards of review for a Site Development request. The stated intent is to ensure compliance with the appropriate land development regulations. The review will also consider consistency with the GMP, the overall site arrangement, traffic, parking, drainage, and compatibility with the surrounding area. The plans as submitted reflect a development that meets or exceeds all dimensional requirements of the LDC. All setbacks, landscape buffers, building height, open space, and impervious requirements have been met. 014W9794 5 Development of the site has been largely confined to the portions of the Subject Property that have been previously developed since at least the mid- 1970s. The northeastern portion of the site retains its natural wetland function which will be preserved and protected, consistent with the County's regulations. Site access is from Tamiami Trail. An existing canal/swale crossing will be shifted slightly to the west to accommodate the driveway alignment with the parking layout. Stormwater is handled through an onsite chambered detention system below the vehicular circulation system, as detailed in the submitted plans and drainage report. Wells on site will provide both potable water and water for fire safety. A septic system has been designed to handle wastewater on the site. A fully enclosed dumpster is included on the property. The landscape plans are consistent with the LDC requirements and are sensitive to the surrounding ecological communities. Native material is proposed for all trees and shrubs. Foundation planting is including around the building. A Type-D buffer runs along the Tamiami Trail frontage. A Type-B buffer is provided along the east property lien and a Type -A along the west property lines, outside of the wetland preserve. The building consists of a two-story concrete structure, with a low pitched metal roof. Massing has been varied through a recessed central panel, emphasizing the entryway. An architectural shade awning structure wraps the building above the second story windows, providing visual interest and shading the windows along that course. A muted color palate and significant front setbacks insure that the building does not create an undue visual imposition along Tamiami Trail. The project also meets the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Plan goals 6.1 and 7.1. The Tamiami Government Center site is approximately 2.5 acres in size. Of the existing native vegetation onsite (0.63 acres), 0.34 acres will be preserved, and an additional 0.10 acres will be restored to cypress swamp. This 0.44 acres will be placed under a conservation easement and subject to a preserve area management plan to ensure its long-term function and protection consistent with the Objectives and Policies under Goals 6 and 7 as applicable Parking Requirement Determination Upon County review, the County staff directed applicant to apply the parking standards found in the code for "Public Buildings." The code requirement calls for: "1 per 200 square feet for administrative office area and 2 per employee of the largest shift for all other areas plus 1 per 5 prisoners based on the maximum holding capacity for any jails." Applying this standard to the development program provides a requirement of: 1,772 square feet of administrative office area = 9 spaces Maximum 10 employees at all other areas = 20 spaces 014W9794 6 Thus the site must provide 29 spaces, and the site plan as proposed provides 44 spaces. The additional spaces will be important to the Tribe during monthly community meetings and during emergency hurricane shelter operations. IX. Conditional Use Request Review The Subject Property is located in the zoning Conservation district. LDC Sec. 2.03.09.B.1.c.2. allows for a conditional use for "essential services" in this district. LDC Sec. 10.08.00.D. states that approval of a conditional use shall be reviewed to insure there are no adverse impacts to the public. Specific requirements are: 1. Consistency with the LDC and Growth Management Plan. Finding: The Subject Property has been designed to comply with the LDC and Growth Management Plan regulations. There are no variances required for the Site Development Plan, and the configuration and design have been developed with careful consideration of the surrounding properties and ecological environment. The building is designed to an appropriate scale for the location. 2. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Finding: The proposed site plan provides clear and open vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian access. The relatively limited scale of the development insures that there is no significant impact from traffic flow. Fire and emergency access and circulation have been provided for. 3. The effect the conditional use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. Finding: The proposed use and design of the site will have no negative effects on the neighboring properties. The use will generate virtually no noise, glare or odor effects. While the investment in this property for government services will increase its value, the nature of this conservation district is such that no broader economic impacts will occur. 4. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. Finding: The proposed use and design of the site is compatible with adjacent properties. The vast majority of the surrounding area is undeveloped, natural lands. The development and design of the plans was coordinated with the owner of the adjacent residential property to the east. Based upon these findings, applicant requests approval of the requested conditional use. X. Conclusion The Seminole Tribe has a long and proud history in south Florida, living and subsisting throughout the region. It is the desire of many members of the Tribe to continue to reside in the areas in and around Tamiami Trail. The Seminole Tribe seeks approval for a Governmental Services building capable of providing basic essential services, hurricane shelter, and community 01406979-4 7 information to its Tribal members in this area of Collier County. The Subject Property represents one of the few opportunities to construct the desired building in the region. The proposed design minimizes impacts to the surrounding environment while meeting the Tribe's urgent needs. 01406979-4 8 Big Cypress National Re se rve f 41 University of South Florida, County of Collier, Esri, HERE, Garmin, NGA, USGS, NPS Ir ?• � ,,� I Fes', �,' ,06 t 1Ts,! / R 446 If Z / • ( %AL- 1 �. I • } ti71. l .�.�••��• t. ��• all STOF Govt. Services Parcel • I — — — — — — University of South Florida, County of Collier, Esri, HERE, Garmin, NGA, USGS, NPS UNITED STATES FIFTYMILE BEND QUADRANGLE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1.5 MINUTE SERIES ORTHOPHOTCMAP (TOPOGRAPHIC) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY �10 Sll 5aonnn FEFr 80'52': 81 co,°Spl000n ry r30rr Sou ce'Esn, Maxar, GeoEye Earth' tar Geogra CN 41� I- .a r.. •?, DS, USDA, USGS„AeroGRID IGN ai G.1,rS e . ity,�-q0I, �rte' E I � E e�'Ea,tli5t r gar Ohl � [VIE AID ©S a ��A�U s S, HERE, Garmih, (c) QpenStreetl�Qta`� ntrlb a� ,r , n,djthe GI41%seYi' gr fiRl;, 1 Ldal U er Com�mumlty'EOH H Gar o (c n treet ! p ycommu'nrty. I: �rs1 r .'� ' '., ,� co rib rs d t3.: er-. u. ty gyp. rf I .4i� {. 441 Iwo se er a I � • ! _ " "`fir - �� • " ! �I�` ' • r .12 I - a ! 1 Eye, Earthsta"r Geogr'1p�hcs FIFTYMILE BEND, FLA. 25080-G8-OM-024 r STOF Govt. Services Parcel 1973 . Note: Location of Government Center determined by PHOTOI NS PECT ED 1984 georectifyi ng the USGS map to the current aerial for nn qq rr ii �l)'� �'pp 11 QQ �77 ((�� Collier county and indicating the Collier County Source: Esri, Max�r, MAe,4fir'tUr GeSgr �hic�, CND �iPOIF13S� SYMdS,`AeroGRID, IGN, Property Appraiser'S Parcel for the Site. and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community INSTR 4670595 OR 4776 PG 1255 RECORDED 3/20/2012 11:42 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $1,400.00 REC $18.50 CONS $200,000.00 This instrument prepared by: and return to: Eric Dorsky, Esq. 7320 Griffin Road, Suite 220 Davie, FL 33314 Parcel ID Number: 01238680000 WARRANTY DEED (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture, made this j D day of March, 2012, between Jacqueline P. Glover, a single woman, whose post office address._ is_66,1<.9-Flamingo Road, Melbourne Village, FL 32904 (hereinafter, "Grantor")- $ is Wi` dings, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, whose post office ss 630ff :Road, Hollywood, FL 33024 (hereinafter "Grantee"). Witnesseth, That said Dollars, and other good Grantee, the receipt whi the said grantee, and gl situate, lying and being County, sum of Ten ($10.00) r in hand paid by said bargained and sold to )wing described land, Tracts 118 and 119 o"6gOpk 36, Township 3� South, Range 34 East, Collier County, Florida, more patic>�*-W-desS, "lie&-4k'` follows: Commencing at the intersection or the east line of`sald. to J6 with the northeasterly R/W line of U.S. Hwy 41 run northwesterly along the northeasterly R/W line of U.S. Hwy 41 for a distance of 4545.58 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue northwesterly along said northeasterly R/W line of U.S. Hwy 41 for a distance of 200 feet, to a point; thence deflecting to the right 90' run northeasterly for a distance of 400 feet to a point; thence deflecting to the right 90' run southeasterly for a distance of 200 feet to a point; thence deflecting to the right 90' run southwesterly a distance of 400 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to taxes and assessments for 2011 and subsequent years, as well as conditions, restrictions, easements and agreements of record, if any; provided this provision shall not be deemed to impose the same; zoning and other governmental regulations. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY OF THE G"NTOR, DOES NOT ADJOIN THE HOMESTEAD OF TNF. C_RANTCIR_ ANTI Nn MF.MRFR nF f_RANTCIR'C FAMTT.V RFC nRc. *** OR 4776 PG 1256 *** And the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. In Witness Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Pri t Name: Print Nai'nF- V y r-) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF My commission expires: r: Jacqueline P. Glover IAA vn�•f`u• nwu� ,.e�yro�.d�. atoofFbrl' Comm+v.slon2 N 01695 My Comm expirsa Apr.13, before me on this _ own to me or who has PLAN OF CONVERSION FOR S.T.O.F. HOLDINGS, LTD. The following is the Plan of Conversion for S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd.: 1. The name and form of the organization before conversion is S.T.O.F. Holdings, a Florida limited partnership. 2. The name and form of the organization after conversion will be STOF Holdings LLC, a Florida limited liability company_ 3. Seminole Properties I, Inc., a Florida corporation, is the sole General Partner of S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd., and has a One Percent (1%) in the limited partnership as a whole. The Seminole Tribe of Florida, a federally recognized Indian tribe, is the sole limited partner in S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd. and has a Ninety -Nine Percent (99%) interest in the limited partnership as a whole. Following conversion, Seminole Properties I, Inc. will have a One Percent (1%) interest in the limited liability company as a whole and the Seminole Tribe of Florida will have a Ninety -Nine Percent (99%) interest in the limited liability company as a whole. 4. Management of the, limited liability company will be by a Board of Managers, as set forth in the Operating Agreement attached to this Plan of Conversion. 5. The conversion to a limited liability company shall be effective as of the date of filing of the Certificate of Conversion with the Florida Department of State. APPROVED BY: SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA Lt I Iq I JA Lo By: Marcel us W. Osceo As its Chairman SEMINOLE PROPERTIES 1, INC. W By: Marcellus W. Osceola Jr. As its President Coer Caunty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL. tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership STOF Holdings LLC (f/k/a S.T.O.F. Holdings, Ltd.) 100 An entity wholly -owned by the Seminole Tribe of Florida by and through the Tribal Council C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percents a of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net d. e. f 9. Cofer County 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the itticers, stocKnolders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired 3/10/2012 Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: Co�r County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 or AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 nt/Owner Signature Tara Duhy, Esq. Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) SDPA - 20190000223; CU - 20190000360 i, Jennifer Kolakowski (print name), as Authorized Agent (title, if applicable) of Seminole Properties I, Inc., MGR to S.T.O.F. Holdings, LLC (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerQ applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Michelle Diffenderfer, Esq; and Seth Behn, Esq. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words `as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of El physical presence or ❑online notarization this day of V�k- _ 2013 by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box, Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced _ _ as identification Notary Signature CP508-COA-00115'. 155 REV 314/2020 Ej:"NO otary PubNq'SSai:3- ME FioridW Grlbriella , arttir y G2M xpires I21202 LEWIS Attorneys at Law L LW WALKER Ilw-law.com WALKER Seminole Tribe Trail Government Services Building Neighborhood Information Meeting Report PL20190000223(SDP) / PL20190000360(CU) August 31, 2021 A neighborhood information meeting was held on August 31, 2021, following published notice. The meeting was held at 57303 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Rorida, adjacent to the subject property. Prior to the meeting, a display of the site plan and architecture was displayed for Tribal members living in the area. Approximately 20 local residents and tribal members attended. Attendees were welcome to walk the subject site. A tent was arranged for the event. A handout was provided to everyone in attendance and is attached herewith. A phone line was also opened as provided in the notice and 2 people were shown as having dialed in. Seth Behn, Esq., AICP presented the background, site plan, and architecture. Attendees were able to ask questions about the proposal. An audio recording of the presentation was prepared and is submitted herewith. 01595100-1 ,ACKSONVILLE ST. PEr9iSBURG TALLAHASSE 245 Rverside Ave. 100 Second Ave. South 315 South Calhoun S. Suite 510 Suite 501-S Suite 830 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 S. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 T: 904.353.6410 T: 727.245.0820 T: 850.222.5702 F. 904.353.7619 F. 727.290.4057 F. 850.224.9242 TAM PA 301 West Ratt St. Suite 364 Tampa, Florida 33606 T: 813.775.2331 WEST PALM BEACH 360 South Fbsemary Ave. Suite 1100 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 T: 561.640.0820 F. 561.640.8202 See Things Differently' NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by Seth Behn of Lewis, Longman, & Waler, P.A., representing the Seminole Tribe of Florida and STOF Holdings, LLC on: Tuesday, August 31St at 5:30 p.m. at 57303 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, FL 34141 The meeting is to discuss the Subject Property located at: 57257 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, FL 34141, approximately 31 miles east of the intersection of State Road 29 and Tamiami Trail (U.S. 41). SUBJECT PROPERTY AND MEETING ` LOCATION Big Cypress National Re se rve f � 1 -. �-t1 0 5 10 20 Miles i i i I i i i I University of South Florida, County of Collier, Esri, HERE, Garmin, NGA, USGS, NPS The property owner is petitioning Collier County to approve a Site Development Plan (PL20190000223) and Conditional Use (PL20190000360) to permit a Governmental Services center containing approximately 14,712 square feet on a 1.83 acre property, to include parking and wetland conservation. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and Collier County staff. You may also attend via telephone conference by dialing into: (561) 701-8540 and when prompted entering participant passcode 50557570-# If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, you can contact Seth C. Behn, Esq., AICP / Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A. 360 South Rosemary Avenue, Suite 1100 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-640-0820; SBEHNkLLW-LAW.COM 01524223-3 NBGHI30RHOODINFORMATION METING SEM I N OLE TRAI L GOVERN M ENT CENTER August 31, 2021; 5:30 p.m. Meeting Location: 57303 Tamiami Trail; Ochopee, FL34141 The Seminole Tribe of Florida is proposing to construct a 14,712 square foot Governmental Center at 57257 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Florida. This project is critical for the Tribal Members living along Tamiami Trail who have limited access to health, safety, and other governmental services. The project will also provide a critically needed hurricane shelter for the Seminole community. The project site was selected after a long and diligent search. Very few properties in the region are privately owned as the vast majority are within State and Federal preserves. The project site has the additional advantage that the majority of it had been cleared and developed for many decades, with few remaining environmental resources The site is 1.83 acres in size. The project is proposing a .407 acre conservation area comprised of preserved and restored wetlands. An additional 25' natural buffer will be retained along the border of the conservation area. The remaining site will host the building, parking, landscaping, and drainage. To utilize the site as desired, a Conditional Use is being requested from Collier County to permit "Essential Services." This use allowsthe provision supporting safety, fire, and medical servicesto the Tribal Community. The site will be constructed to the necessary standards to operate as a hurricane shelter and will have an electrical generator on the property. The property hasa"Conservation" zoning designation. Under thisdesignation, thefollowing uses are currently allowed, without a Conditional Use: 1. On privately held land only, single family dwelling units, and mobile homes where the Mobile Home Zoning Overlay exists. 2. On publicly and privately held lands only, dormitories, duplexes and other types of housing, as may be incidental to, and in support of, conservation uses. 3. Passive parks, and other passive recreational uses, including, but not limited to: a) Open space and recreational uses; b) Biking, hiking, canoeing, and nature trails; c) Equestrian paths; and d) Nature preservesand wildlife sanctuaries. 4. Habitat preservation and conservation uses. 5. Family Care Facilities and Group Care Facilities. 6. Sporting and Pecreational camps incidental to conservation useson public lands; or, on privately held lands. 7. Agricultural uses that fall within the scope of Sections 163.3162(4) and 823.14(6) Florida Statutes. 8. Oil and gas exploration subject to applicable state drilling permits and Collier County non -environmental site development plan review procedures. 01463621-2 ::1►11 AIWNgo: Tamiami Gout Center KimleyoHorn . / a ,� 40' ARCHITECT. NIEXgR 9F.stcx i3/lx %ENSl'AR � BermelLO Ajamil cusrD ST - 1a•-a o1�nr & Partners C ROOM ROOM - OFFICE 1 29F PSINK NECH MOP SINK I�SF fi<lON ELEC = ROOM OFFICE $g�SIFF�E xEw ne lrvivawevurvcl a A SF - 1568E 1075E 13a SF 2565E Iu1E aR INLPN66CPPE ELEY orv9TAIR osa 'in SF xFP Fxo1EFR� STAIR CORRIDOR nn��Evx®� GORPoUOR - T495F 1865E cuxslxllClgx Mwsm9 � AL ROOM � STORAGE n5F OFFICE 2405F OFFICE 2495F OFFICE - 2495F MULTI -PURPOSE ROOM 5495F OFFICE OFFICE ZI25F 2665F - _ - ® OWli6il SECOND FLOOR SEMIMIE TMHE OF FLORIDA TAMIAMI TPAIL OCHOPEE. FL 2 116' b PATIO - 5595E V° _x _ c. �IWe. NECH _______ ROOM 615F _ _ STORAGE 0 ELDER GYM - "' RPo00 1408E _ __ -- SERYIGE 81— 2269E 633 SF -SF MENS RR RR'{ 1249F TAIfYP 1 SF C STAIR 1]I9F MULTI -PURPOSE L SHELTER GORRIOOR RR w11 tl ROOMCONCEPTUAL DESIGN 19065E M-�LOBBY MOSF SEMINOD GOVERNMENT 5as9F tl[HE eREM BUILDING ROON5493E b a b IN �616EWP16� 1:406LOPEV _ ouvo �616EWA111� HEY PLAN 4 iYL 11 ® Plgecl Rumba 1s033001 Oete 11-21-Ti119 q e[rvcn DI FLOOR PLANS alseruD caouxo Flnoa REVISED 04-03-20 6•=,•� A-100 �OeNT Op', 2 N O *ARCH 3. \b November 16, 2021 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Big Cypress National Preserve 33100 Tamiami Trail East Ochopee, Florida 34141-9710 Collier County Collier County Government Center 3301 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, Florida 34112 Re: Seminole Trail Government Services Building To Whom it May Concern: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE The Seminole Tribe of Florida has contacted my office to share their proposal for the construction of a Government Center at 57257 Tamiami Trail, Ochopee, Florida. This property, while privately owned, falls within the boundaries of the Big Cypress National Preserve, for which I serve as Superintendent. I have reviewed the plans and architecture for the proposed structure and the proposed use. Big Cypress National Preserve is home to many tribal members, and we recognize the importance of the Tribe providing governmental services and a hurricane shelter to its members in this region. The Preserve has no objections to the proposed Government Center. Sincerely, hom ors �— Superintendent Big Cypress National Preserve THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY & RETURN TO: NAME: MICHELLE DIFFENDERFER, ESQ. LEWIS, LONGMAN & WALKER, P.A. ADDRESS: 360 S. ROSEMARYAVE. SUITE 1100 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 PARCEL I.D. # 01238680000 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR PROCESSING DATA I SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDING DATA CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT given this day of , 20 , by STOF HOLDINGS, LLC (hereinafter "STOF' or "Grantor"), whose address is 6300 STI RLI NG ROAD HOLLYWOOD, FL 33024, to Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter "Collier County" or "Grantee"). Grantor and Grantee may hereafter be collectively referred to as the "parties." WHEREAS, STOF is the owner of that certain tract of land located in Collier County, Florida described in Exhibit "A' attached hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "property"); and WHEREAS, STOF has requested approval of a Site Development Plan (County Project PL20190000223), and said plan includes a wetland preserve and wetland preserve management plan; and WHEREAS, in support of the Site Development Plan, Collier County is requiring that this Conservation Easement ("Easement") be entered into and recorded in the land records of Collier County to bind STOF; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to establish their respective rights and responsibilities relative to the use and maintenance of the conservation area described in the attached Composite Exhibit "B" (the Easement Property). NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor hereby conveys a Conservation Easement to Collier County as follows: 1. Grantor, its successors, heirs, assigns and/or transferees, hereby grants a non- exclusive easement to Collier County over and across the property described as Exhibit "B" for the purpose of conservation. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of the conservation easement. 01463364-2 2. No buildings, structures or impediments of any nature may be constructed, placed or permitted on, over or across the Easement Property. No dumping or placing of soil or other substances such as trash or unsightly or offensive materials shall be permitted on the Easement Property. There shall be no removal or destruction of trees, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic/nuisance vegetation removal. Excavation, dredging or removal of soil material, peat, rock or other material substance in such a manner as to affect the surface shall be prohibited on the Easement Property. No dikes or fencing shall be permitted on the Easement Property. There shall be no other activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control or fish and wildlife habitat conservation or preservation permitted on the Easement Property. The Easement Property shall be in no way altered from its natural or permitted state. The following exceptions apply: a. Archaeological surveys or excavations are permissible for areas designated as archaeological sites by the State or Federal governments or by Grantee; or b. Uses as permitted by Section 3.05.07.1-1 of the Collier County Land Development Code. In accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07.H.1.d, oil extraction and related processing operations are uses which are exempt from the restrictions herein and shall remain allowed uses on the lands described herein, provided it is an allowable use in the underlying zoning district. 3. Grantor, its heirs, successors or assigns shall bear the responsibility for maintaining the Easement Property, including, but not limited to, regular maintenance as may be required by any governmental agency having jurisdiction relative thereto. The Easement Property shall at all times be maintained in accordance with applicable requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4. No right of access by the general public to any part of the Easement Property is being conveyed. Collier County shall have the right to access and use of the Easement property for the purpose of making inspections; however, Collier County shall have no obligation to maintain the Easement Property, nor shall Collier County have the right to use the Easement Property for any purpose inconsistent with the terms of this Conservation Easement. 5. Grantor reserves all rights as owner of the Easement Property, including the right to engage in uses of the Easement Property that are not prohibited herein and which are not inconsistent with any County ordinance, regulation or development permit, and the intent and purposes of this Conservation Easement. 6. Grantor shall pay any and all real property taxes and assessments levied by competent authority on the property. 7. Grantor shall insert the terms and restrictions of this Conservation Easement in any subsequent deed or other legal instrument by which Grantor divests itself of any interest in the property. 01463364-2 8. All notices, consents, approvals or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly given if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party or successor in interest. 9. This Conservation Easement may be amended, altered, released or revoked only by written agreement between the parties hereto or their heirs, successors or assigns, which shall be filed in the public records of Collier County. 10. This Conservation Easement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of all present and future owners of any portion of the Property and their successors and/or assigns, it being the intention of the Grantor that this Conservation Easement be perpetual. 11. If any provisions of the Conservation Easement or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Conservation Easement shall not be affected thereby, as long as the purpose of the Conservation Easement is preserved. 12. Enforcement of the terms, provisions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement shall be at the reasonable discretion of Grantee, and any forbearance on behalf of Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach hereof by Grantor, shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver of Grantee's rights hereunder. 13. The terms and conditions of this Conservation Easement may be enforced by the Grantee by injunctive relief and other appropriate available remedies, and Grantor consents that venue of such enforcement actions shall lie exclusively in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. In any enforcement action in which the Grantee prevails, Grantee shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs in the trial and appellate courts in addition to the cost of restoring the land to the natural vegetative and hydrologic condition existing at the time of execution of this Conservation Easement or to the natural vegetative state required for a development permit. These remedies are in addition to any other remedy, fine or penalty, which may be applicable under Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes. N WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunder set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. 01463364-2 Sign, sealed and delivered in the presence of: WITNESSES: STOF HOLDINGS, LLC Printed Name: Printed Name: STATE OF FLORI DA ) COUNTY OF By: Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ❑ physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this : day of , 20 by , as of STOF HOLDINGS LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or has produced as identification My Commission Expires: Acceptance by Grantee: ATTEST: Crystal K. Kinzel, Clerk go NOTARY PUBLI C Printed Name: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLI ER COUNTY, FLORI DA Deputy Gerk William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Assistant County Attorney 01463364-2 EXHIBITA PARENT TRACT 01463364-2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PER TITLE SEARCH REPORT) SHEET I ❑F TRACTS 118 AND 119 OF SECTION 36. TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, TITLE SEARCH REPORT TABLE FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 WITH THE CASTLE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SEARCH EFFECTIVE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF 4545.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE APRIL 1, P019 AT I1i00 PM CONTINUE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY R/W UNE OF U.S. 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF INSTRUNEN RECORDING AFFECT 200 FEET, TO A PCINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN NORTHEASTERLY FOR A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN SOUTHEASTERLY T TYPE ➢ESCRIPTION DATA S PLUTTE➢ FOR A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN O.R.B. LEGAL SOUTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 40C FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. FOUND 5/8' IRON ROD & CAP FOUND 5/9' IRON ROD &CAP DEED WARRANTY 4776, YES ➢ESC. LEI20D.DD' LB# 69 DEED PG.1255, SHOWN �� qA +Qr ++QATW1{ &B. D.CA. D1IL, aAs. HI NERAL OR COVERS NOEN� AGREEMENT EITHER PG.1 6, YES RE TW16 + I RESERVATION B.C.R. SITE TRACT m � _ + WETLAND AS NARKED BY + a iTWiS La I K.SLILY IMLEY-HORN & Assoc., INC. z DATED R018 a F• TWA 4, ' TWS ASONAL HIGF; Y C TER MARK 42 +TAB TW7r 7� +fi'S' , TWI. IB' + !I T1J9 ++ * w o 5.4'X7A' cmi WATER PUMP {CD TW6 m -15' i HOUSE +TWIT ,i�IG T TW11 12' 8 m �ONCRETE 10r-15' F R? m Dunn 5/01 M IRDN ROD & CAP IWATER'S LB#6680 EDGE 26' MIRTH W4} rTW3 BANiI #+ n1 + 1 l p E.9'+t Z.S' �•+ 1�+ + 4¢v z =qC6 WSW w el w TENCE METAL P11 TWI �a TRACT 119•-� _ GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TW 20 0b' 6' CHAIN LINK+9 " FENCE'°' 2_1' 56.3' m e.R•.� if + s. CONCRETE I 8 � � Tll2i B +rTW23 + +a•+ S'6++g,y SRAVA ROAD Q, . { ELECTRIC { POST { 8'- TOP Of HANK FOUND 5/8' R©N ROD & CAP TW LB#6680 r10, 26' NCRTHi 6TW26 NTW25 P.O.B. - + TW27 +'�° I'i"+ °� 'Z +°�2DD,DD'+� ABBREVIATIONS; PALM TREE _ R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE HEIGHT IN FEET ~+ HWY HIGHWAY SYMBOL LEGEND: I P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT -C>- POWER POLE ' P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING CBS CONCRETE BLOCK F ANCHOR STRUCTURE F.FL.EL. FINISHED FLOOR PALM TREE ELEVATION rL CENTERLINE STRANGLER FIG 1 TW DELINEATION FLAGS SHW SEASONAL HIGH 10"--1 TREE WATER LOCATION � WETLANDS ADDRESS: !DELINEATION 57257 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST CANOPY DIAMETE=R IN FEET SURVEYOR'S NOTES' TRUNK ➢IAMETER IN INCHES SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS NOT ABSTRACTED BY THIS FIRM FOR EASEMENTS, RIGHT -OF -WRY, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD, AND OWNERSHIP WAS NOT TW21DETERMINED. Q9' SCALE OF SOME FEATURES MAY BE EXAGGERATED FOR CLARITY. BURIED FOUNDATIONS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN. ELEVATION NOTE: ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERIGAN VERTICAL DATUM OF IS88 IN AVD88}, SHOWN TH US: IO AND ARE BASED ON NGS PCINT J 248, 61SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BECHMARK DISK SET IN TOP OF CONCRETE o MONUMENT AND STAMPED J 248 1965 LOCATED ABOUT C5 14.25 MILES EAST ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 41 FROM THE It JUNCTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 94 THE CADE-COLLIER COUNTY LINE, 0.2 MILE NORTHWEST OF HIGHWAY BRIDGE NO. 117, 144 FEET SOUTHEAST OF A DRIVE LEDING NORTHEAST ACROSS THE TAMIAMI CANAL, 24.5 FEET NORTHEAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE HIGHWAY, 7 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE SOUTHWEST EDGE OF THE CANAL, 1.5 FEET SOUTHEAST OF A METAL WITNESS POST, ABOUT LEVEL WITH THE HIGHWAY AND SET IN THE TOP OF A CONCRETE POST PROJECTING 0.3 FOOT. ELEVATION - 8.53' (NAVD88) SURVEY CERTIFICATION: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP DR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS CINTLY ESTA13USHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7a, 7h. AND 8 ON TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON JULY 27th, 2019. a Poe RAIL 9�-TAMIAMI TR ILUARD RAIL AS rs� NCFIM WA R'Ss F4 r{ PAVEMENT.?r `U•S. HWY 41) -SET 60D NAIL EDGE +q LL,=7`i SKETCH OF BOUNDARY & TOP GRAPHIC SURVEY CERTIFIED TO, S.T.O.F. HOUDIIN(S6 LTD.. A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SEMINOLE TRIBE OF F'LORIDE TAMIAh11 GOVERNMENT CENTER, 57257 US-41 OCHOPEE, FL. (PARCEL NUMBER: 0123868000O) ADD SEASONAL LFMFR 9TITLE G RELIF /27/'ADD �ACPTABLE RESIONMR I� DRAWN BY, LPICHECKED BY- MR MR \PReJECTS\ZnID\la-000aD - 57257 TAHLMd TRAIL EAST\19- N& MILLER�� LEGG South Flonda Office: 5747 N. Andrews Way Ft. Lauderdale, Florida • =09-2364 954A3&-7000 • Fax:954-43&-9%4 www.millerlepg.mm SOUTHEAST CORNER (If SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP OUTH ANGE 34 EAST EAST LINE OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP SOUTH E RANGE 34 EAST NORTHEASTERLY I��-OF- UF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) GRAPHIC SCALE / I IN FEET I I 1 INCH = 40 FEET J 1. HEAEBY CERTIFY THAT TH IVEr NESTS STANDARDS CIF 07TCF PRAAS seFLORIDA T FeRTM BY TNF DFFARTNFNT OF AIRICULTUME AND CONSUMER SERVICES OF PROFEMENAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER SJ-17, FLORIDA ADHINISTRATIVE OWE PIRSOANT 70 SEDTION 472AEL FLCRDA STAKES• DATED THIS 29Sh DAT OF JIl1E 2LL6 AA 171v'_ 70� P L -- K TIN P. REISSI PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE Of FLORIDA REOISTRATTON 10" NOT VALID WITHOUT TIE SIGNATURE AND THE OR RAISE➢ SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICINSED SURVEYOR AN EXHI BIT B CONSERVATION TRACT 01463364-2 SHEET 1 OF 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (CONSERVATION AREA) PORTIONS OF TRACTS 118 AND 119 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF 4545.58 FEET; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90` RUN NORTH 4331'56" EAST 369.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 4628'06" WEST 45.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°32'09" WEST 50.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46024'20" WEST 54.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4331'56" WEST 22.58 FEET TO A POINT ON A 169.03 FOOT RADIUS NON —TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 37044'00" WEST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37'51'34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 111.69 FEET TO A POINT OF NON —TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 43'31'56" EAST 149.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°28'04" EAST 200.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43031'56" WEST 30.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINING 17725 SQUARE FEET (0.407 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. SITE LOCATION i ti�y�9q/C J r _ n W w ADDRESS: 57257 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR SKETCH �l DAIL I R E V I S I O N S ID"" ICRKIII DRAWN BY: LP I CHECKED BY: KL TOWNSHIP 53S—RANGE 34E—SECTION 36 LOCATION MAP N.T.S. SKETCH & DESCRIPTION CERTIFIED TO: SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA ``/ MILLER LEGG South Florida Office: 5747 N. Andrews Way Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-2364 954-436-7000 • Fax: 954-436-8664 www.milledegg.com THIS SKETCH DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH MEETS STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. DATED THIS 7th DAY OF EMBER 020 A.D. KAREN A. L PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE OF FLORIDA REGISTRATION No. 5837 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: LB6680 PROJECT HO I FILE A0- 18-00038 SD-1 SHEET 2 OF 2 GRAPHIC SCALE sR 90°0 0 0 30 60 120MEN IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET CONSERVATION / AREA / / S43'31'56"W R, ys9 30.58' 3 dl3 �5734 �.�s O \ 169, cf sr6 A �0 i p9CT J�tK P.O.B. / G9 S43'31'56"W 06 W / 22.58' 45 80' �yCT / / / �tK / ABBREVIATIONS: / R/W RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE / HWY HIGHWAY / P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING R RADIUS ol A DELTA ANGLE 90°0'O" L ARC LENGTH NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE i R �- % o F ti%o �6 p� oSTST oGTy N/`K Li 9J T 5F7 A� O oc F9ST MILLERLEGG J South Fbrida Office:5747 N.Andrews Way Certificate of Authorization L.B. 6680 THIS SKETCH DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY Ft. lauderda 6, Fbrida 33309064 954436-7000 Fax:9544368664 www mil ed egg com III SKETCH &DESCRIPTION °RO0 N0. FILE NO. 18-0"cT0038 SD-2 \PROJECTS\2018\18—OD038 — 57257 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST\18-00038_SMOVIG 12/10/20 by LPODOLSK Ifter County Growth Management Department Development Review July 20, 2020 Michelle Diffenderfer, Esq. Lewis, Longman and Walker, PA 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 1500 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Alternative Architectural Design PL20200001276, Seminole Trail Government Center Dear Ms. Diffenderfer: The Development Review Division has reviewed your request for "Alternative Architectural Design" regarding the above referenced project in accordance with LDC Section 5.05.08.G of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). This letter is to advise you of staff s findings concerning your request. The subject property is zoned CON-ACSC/ST `Special Treatment' on the Collier County's zoning map and is located at 57257 Tamiami Trail East in Collier County. Non-residential buildings and sites, as in the case of the subject project, are required to meet the requirements of LDC Section 5.05.08. However, in accordance with LDC Section 5.05.08 G.4.a.v Specific Building Type this project qualifies for an administrative determination of deviations from the Section 5.05.08 development standards. The Deviations and Alternate Compliance provision of the LDC states that upon request by the applicant, the County Manager or his designee may administratively approve a Site Development Plan application that includes an "alternative architectural design and site development plan" that may be substituted in whole or in part for a plan meeting the standards of LDC Section 5.05.08. In approving an alternative plan, the County Manager or designee must find that the proposed alternative plan accomplishes the purpose and intent of LDC Section 5.05.08. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant describes the project as follows: Proposing to construct a 14,712 sq. ft. Government Services Building and hurricane shelter for the Seminole Tribe. The project is located at the extreme Southeast corner of Collier County in the Big Cypress National Preserve. DEVIATIOREQUEST —PRIMARY FACADE TANDARDS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.05.08 D.2.b., Primary Facade Standards, the design of primary facade must include, at a minimum, two of the eleven design features listed for buildings greater than 5,000 square feet. The proposed South facade of the Building is considered primary. The applicant request seeks to allow alternative design deviations for the features required as detailed below. Development Review 9 Growth Management Department • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 ARC PL20200001276 — Seminole Trail Government Center Page 2 Reguest for deviation from the i2rimary facade standards for the Buildings East & West Primary facades: The request notes that the design of the building's South facade does not meet the stated requirements of LDC 5.05.08 and are proposing to meet or provide an alternative to LDC 5.05.08 D.2.b Primary Facade Design Features. The design of primary facades must include, at a minimum, two of the design features identified in LDC section 5.05.08 D.2.b and are proposing to meet or provide an alternative to LDC Sections 5.05.08 D.2.b Design Features. The design proposes the following: • Solar Shading covering 100 percent of each facade. An increase of 50% beyond code minimum. • The subject property is narrow and deep. The orientation of the building is sited with the short facade facing Tamiami Trail. The area of the short Primary facade is approximately 45 feet wide, one fourth the length of the secondary facade proposed to be the primary entrance to the facility and has less of a visual impact on the ROW. • The building is set back approximately 110 feet from the ROW and is screened with a 15-foot type D landscape buffer. • The building is located at the extreme Southeast corner of Collier County in the Big Cypress National Preserve. Staff comments: LDC Section 5.05.08 G.2, provides review criteria for Deviations and Alternative Compliance and states that "in approving an alternative plan, the County Manager or designee must find that the proposed alternative plan accomplishes the purpose and intent of this section. If the plan is approved through this section, the site development plan approval letter shall specifically note the deviations and the basis for their approval. " Regarding the proposed deviation to the primary fafade standards from LDC Sections 5.05.08 D.2.b, the combination of the natural landscaping, building orientation and remote location provides an alternative for the individual South primaryfagade requirements and are appropriate for the use and unique function of the building and its site context. Based on the review of the proposed alternative design and justification, staff is of the opinion that the alternative architectural design depicted in the proposed plans accomplishes the purpose and intent of LDC Sections 5,05.08 D.2.b, the Primary Facade Standards of the LDC. Please note that approved deviations are allowed only as to the specific design and plan(s) reviewed. Any modification to an approved design and plan(s) shall necessitate re -review and approval by the County Manager or his designee. Very truly Peter Shawinsky, RA Development Review Division Collier County Government T: 239.252.8523 Email: Peter.shawin kv a7collier un fl. v Development Review a Growth Management Department • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 . 239-252-2400 Seth Behn From: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 6:16 PM To: Seth Behn Cc: FinnTimothy Subject: RE Historic Preservation Board External Email Good afternoon, Yes, the HAPB had a quorum and the Oultural R-,source S.irvey was officially ratified and that approval will be incorporated into the conditional use application. Respectfully, i1 Fbymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coen C.o�.nty Exceeding expectations everyday! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division %rvey at https:// goo.gl/ eX'vgT. From: Seth Behn Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 3:57 PM To: BellowsRay Subject: Historic Preservation Board EXTEF;NAL BVIAIL Thisemail isfrom an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachmentsor clicking links. Hi Ray, I meant to ask prior to the meeting, but did the HAPB Meeting manage to have quorum last Friday? If so, wasthe Seminole Trail Government Center approval ratified? Thanks, Seth C Behn, AICP I Attorney 515 North Flagler Drive, S.iite 1500 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 sbehnQlw-law.com 1 (o) 561.640.0820 (c) 561.602.3771 vCard I Website I Bio I join usonline Kimley>>> Horn February 26, 2021 ■ Mr. Michael Sawyer Suite150 Transportation Planning 655 North Franklin Street Collier County Tampa, Florida 33602 2685 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Re: Seminole Trail Government Center Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Collier County, Florida Dear Mr. Sawyer, Pursuant to conversation with County staff on July 15, 2019 and comments received on January 21, 2021, the purpose of this letter is to document the updated Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Seminole Trail government center to be located at 57257 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) in Ochopee, Florida. A site plan is attached for reference. The existing project site is currently vacant. The Applicant is seeking approval for up to 14,712 square feet of government office building use. For the purposes of this analysis, the buildout of the development is anticipated in 2022. Access to the site is to be provided via an existing full -access connection along Tamiami Trail East (US 41). Pursuant to discussions with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) staff on February 24, 2021, the existing driveway is proposed to be widened and improved to meet FDOT standards. The correspondence with FDOT is attached for reference. Per your guidance regarding the requirements of a TIA in an email dated July 15, 2019, a trip generation analysis was conducted for the government office building land use. To appropriately address the transportation impacts related to the proposed development, the analysis was undertaken in accordance with the Collier County Guidelines and Procedures for a "Small Scale Study." Small Scale Study Project Trip Generation: The trip generation potential for the proposed development was based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, for land use code (LUC) 730 (Government Office Building). As previously discussed with County staff, the highest and most -intense independent variable will be used to estimate the proposed development's trip generation potential. The 14,712 square -foot government office building will employ up to 12 people per day. As indicated in Table 1, the proposed development is anticipated to generate 49 net, new external trips (37 entering, 12 exiting) during ■ TEL: 813 620 1460 Kimley»>Horn Page 2 the a.m. peak -hour and 25 net, new external trips (6 entering, 19 exiting) during the p.m. peak -hour. Pass -by and internal capture trips were not considered in this analysis. The proposed development is anticipated to generate fewer than 50 net, new total peak -hour trips; therefore, no significant operational or roadway impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed development per the Collier County Guidelines and Procedures for a "Small Scale Study." Table 1: Proiect Trip Generation ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NET NEW EXTERNALTRIPS Land Use LUC Scale Units' Peak -hour Equation In Out In Out Total AM T=3.34(X) 75% 25% 37 12 49 14.712 KSF PM T=1.71 (X) 25% 75% 6 19 25 Government Office Building 730 AM LN(T)=0.56*LN(X)+1.81 75% 25% 19 6 25 12 EMP PM LN(T)=0.87*LN(X)+0.18 1 20% 1 80% 2 8 10 1: The trip generation potential of the proposed development is based on the conservative estimate using the independent variable, KSF. Proiect Trip Distribution and Assignment: For the proposed government office building use, new traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development was distributed and assigned to the adjacent roadway of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) based upon Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) historical Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data for count station 030011. The distribution of project traffic is anticipated to be 50%from the east and 50% from the west along Tamiami Trail East (US 41). The FDOT AADT data attached for reference. Figure 1 illustrates the project trip distribution at the project driveway. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the a.m. and p.m. peak -hour project traffic at the project driveway. Roadway Network Link Analysis: The roadway segment capacity and existing available peak directional volume were provided in the 2020 Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR) published by Collier County. As indicated in Table 2, the directly -accessed roadway segment of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) from SR 29 to Dade County Line will not exceed 110% of the adopted service capacity with or without the addition of the proposed project trips. The 2020 peak -hour peak directional volume provided in the AUIR for US 41 was utilized as the eastbound through volume and the westbound through volume for purposes of the turn lane analysis. The 2019 AUIR indicted a growth rate of 11.76% for the roadway segment of US 41 from SR 29 to Dade County Line; therefore, the peak -hour peak directional volume was increased by 11.76% annually for two years to calculate future background volumes in the buildout year of 2022. Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the a.m. and p.m. peak -hour future traffic at the project driveway. ■ TEL: 813 620 1460 Kimley>>> Horn Table 2: Directional Roadway Segment Analysis Page 3 2020AUIR 2022Projected Minimum Minimum Peak -Hour Maximum Future Total Directional Peak Peak -Hour Peak Trip LOS Project Future Total LOS Roadway From To CCAUIR Direction Hour Service Peak Growth Growthto Direction Bank Exceeded Traffic Peak -Hour (2022) Peak- Volume to Exceeded Link ID Direction Rate** 2022 Project Capacity Ratio Volume(vph) Background (vph)* without Distribution Hour Traffic with Traffic Traffic (vac) Volume* Traffic Volume Project? Project? Tamiami Trail East Dade SR 29 97 Eastbound 1,000 190 11.76% 1.25 237 8 No 50% 25 270 0.27 No (US41) County Line *Source: Col I i er County Ann ua I Upd ate & Inventory Report/Capita I Improvement Element (2020 AUI R/CIE) **Source: Col I i er County An nua I Update & Inventory Report/Capita I Improvement Element (2019 AUI R/CIE) TEL: 813 6201460 Kimley>>> Horn Page 4 Turn Lane Review: Based upon the FDOT Access Management Guidebook, a right -turn lane may be warranted for a roadway with a speed limit of 45 miles per hour or greater if the right -turn volume is between 35 and 55 vehicles during the peak hour. No more than 19 ingress, westbound right -turns per hour are anticipated during the peak -hours; therefore, an exclusive right -turn lane is not warranted at the project driveway. Exclusive left -turn lanes are not provided in the vicinity of the development along the segment ofTamiami Trail East (US 41) and no more than 19 ingress, eastbound left -turns are anticipated during the peak -hours; therefore, an exclusive left -turn lane is not recommended at the project driveway. Conclusion Based upon the results of the analysis, the existing roadway network is anticipated to be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed Seminole Trail government center development. The maximum trip generation for the Conditional Use shall not exceed 25 two-way p.m. peak -hour net trips based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. We will follow-up to see if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Very truly yours, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Christopher Hatton, P.E. Addie Kraemer, P.E. Senior Vice -President Transportation Analyst Attachments: Conceptual Site Plan FDOT AADT Information 2019 Annual Update & Inventory Report/Capital Improvement Element 2020 Annual Update & Inventory Report/Capital Improvement Element Table 2: Roadway Segment Analysis ■ TEL: 813 620 1460 Legend Roadway Study Intersection XX% Entering Project Traffic Distribution (XX%) Exiting Project Traffic Distribution N * Site � 4 � US 4�/Tamiami •, ((5) Kimley)>> Horn ��0/db fl —O/oo >>-,,t$ »t< »$ fi—•>> fib•• —" >>f# >>t< >>t<»fi Legend Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX A.M. Peak -Hour Project Traffic N * Site I I L I � � 4 I US 4717 arni, i Trail •„ « 5> Kimley>>> Horn ofi-4-1>1/do %",A w Legend Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX P.M. Peak -Hour Project Traffic N * Site I I L � 4 I US 41/p arni, i Trail •„ « 5> Kimley>>> Horn — ofi-4-1>1/do %",A w Legend Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX A.M. Peak -Hour Future Traffic N * Site I I L I � ° � 4 I US 41�T arni, i Trail •„ « 5> Kimley>>> Horn �>L -«fi ««<f�> fly,"".0/00 w Legend Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX P.M. Peak -Hour Future Traffic N * Site I I L � 4 I US 41�T arni, i Trail •„ « 5> Kimley>>> Horn - —«fi ««<f�> fig,"".0/oo w Kraemer, Addie From: Clark, Mark <Mark.Clark@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 12:17 PM To: Kraemer, Addie Cc: Hatton, Christopher; Sansaricq, Brandon; Schaill, Leanna; DeBoy, Brian T; Bliven, Rob Subject: RE: Seminole Trail Government Center - FDOT Access Categories: External Addie, Access Management has reviewed the concept plan for this parcel and provides the following comments and concerns: This segment of US 41 has an Access Management classification of 4 with a posted speed limit of 60 mph, driveway spacing between connections is 660 feet and full median opening spacing is 2640 feet. The concept plan reflects the site being redeveloped to include a new government building, with internal site circulation and parking area. The concept plan proposes to use the existing driveway by widening it to 24' width. In evaluating the access point, while the existing location does not meet the driveway spacing standards mentioned above, the Department would consider issuing Non -conforming driveway at the existing location. The driveway will have to be design to meet FDOT's Standard Plans for driveway modifications and being design to conform to District One standards to include a 16' inbound lane , 12' outbound lane and a minimum of 35' radii for the returns. Please note the plans seem to reflect curb and gutter incorporated into the driveway design, this is not a curb and gutter section of US 41, no curbing can be introduced within FDOT's right of way. As stated, the driveway would be Non -conforming, typically cross -access is required when a Non -conforming driveway is permitted. I would expect at a minimum a cross -access easement will be required to obtain this permit, as the Department is required by law to have a means to bring non -conforming driveways up to standards when conforming access becomes available. The site would appear to fall into a category "B" permit, this category will not require a full traffic study, a simple traffic assessment should be sufficient for this review. All improvements within FDOT right of way must be designed to conform to FDOT's Standard Plans and or the Florida Design Manual. All necessary plans and or required data to review this submittal should be submitted via the One Stop Permitting site . Please note: For future reference, please note the Department measures driveway spacing from edge of pavement to edge of pavement, and median opening spacing from centerline to centerline. Per F.A.C. 14-96.003(4): "Traffic control features and devices in the right of way such as traffic signals, channelizing islands, medians, median openings, and turn lanes are operational and safety characteristics of the State Highway System and are not means of access. The Department may install, remove, or modify any present or future traffic control feature or device in the right of way to promote traffic safety in the right of way or promote efficient traffic operations on the highway. A connection permit is only issued for connections and not for any present or future traffic control devices at or near the permitted connections. The permit may describe these features and/or devices, but such description does not create any type of interest in such features." The items discussed in this email were based upon conceptual information provided to the Department at the time of this request and are subject to change pending any changes to the development plans for the property, changes to the existing state roadway system, or changes to the department's standards or specifications that could impact the development of said property. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Mark Clark Access Mazlagemelit Specialist FDOT SWIFT .S'uiiGuide Center 10041 Dazuels Parkway Fort Myers, Florida 33913 mark.clark9Mot.stale.Aus (239) 22i -1984 Office (863) 272 -3366 Cell From: Kraemer, Addie <Addie.Kraemer@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 2:42 PM To: Clark, Mark <Mark.Clark@dot.state.fl.us>; Schaill, Leanna <Leanna.Schaill@dot.state.fl.us>; DeBoy, Brian T <Brian.Deboy@dot.state.fl.us> Cc: Hatton, Christopher <Christopher.Hatton@kimley-horn.com>; Sansaricq, Brandon <brandon.sansaricq@kimley- horn.com> Subject: RE: Seminole Trail Government Center - FDOT Access Good Afternoon Mark, Thank you for beginning the review, we appreciate it! We have provided answers to your questions in green text below. We are in the final stages of review with Collier County and are anticipating acceptance of all other aspects of the site plan in the next submittal. Please see the attached aerial exhibit which shows that the site is proposing to widen and improve the existing driveway connection to access the proposed government center. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you! Addie Addie Kraemer, P.E. Kimley-Horn 1 655 North Franklin Street, Suite 150, Tampa, FL 33602 Direct: 813 635 5517 1 Mobile: 561 319 4759 Connect with us: Twitter I Linkedln I Facebook I Instagram I Kimley-Horn.com »•» fii<+t„ §»i.fD i.> —t» —" > »> < —t i.t•»> <— —fi —fi From: Clark, Mark <Mark.Clark@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Monday, February 22, 20219:26 AM To: Kraemer, Addie <Addie.Kraemer@kimlev-horn.com> Cc: Hatton, Christopher <Christopher.Hatton@kimlev-horn.com>; Sansaricq, Brandon <brandon.sansaricg@kimley- horn.com>; Schaill, Leanna <Leanna.Schaill@dot.state.fl.us>; DeBoy, Brian T <Brian.Debov@dot.state.fl.us> Subject: RE: Seminole Trail Government Center - FDOT Access Good Morning Addie, I have a few questions I hope you can help me with , as I continue this review for the parcel at 57257 Tamiami Trail in Collier County: Aerials reflect the site's existing access being utilized by the adjacent parcel to the south for close to a decade. Please provide clarification on the impacts to the existing uses of the driveway with the proposed changes. The existing driveway to the property is proposed to be improved and expanded to be 24' wide, as shown in the attached aerial exhibit. The existing buildings on the site are proposed to be demolished. We are far along in the site plan process with Collier County and due to the wetland locations and the fact that the driveway is currently existing, the site was designed utilizing the existing access point location. The driveway spacing requirements in this area is 660 feet, the parcel does not have adequate frontage to meet these requirements. Has the developer explored the potential for a joint use access location, or cross -access to an existing driveway? The existing driveway is proposed to be improved and expanded to be 24' wide. The existing driveway does not currently meet spacing criteria; however, exclusive turn lanes into the site are not warranted which is typically a main cause for the need for standard driveway spacing criteria to be met. It is intended to utilize the existing driveway to provide access to the proposed use of government center and to not have shared access between the proposed government center and the existing uses to the south. Due to the condition of the buildings to the south and the different uses between the project site (proposed government building owned by the Seminole Tribe of Florida) and the adjacent parcels (agricultural use to the south owned privately and agricultural use to the north owned by Salvation Army according to Collier County Property Appraiser), a shared access is not preferable or appropriate. 3. The proposed driveway location does not provide the best possible driveway spacing, has the developer explored relocating the access to the northern property line to achieve maximum driveway separation in this area? Due to the wetland locations and the fact that the driveway is currently existing, the site was designed utilizing the existing access point location. Any assistance you can provide will be appreciated. Miuk Cliuk Access ALmggemelit Speciidist FDOT SWIFT SuliGuide Center 10041 Daniels Parkway Fort Myers, Florida 33913 mark.clark@dot stnte.1l. us (239) 225 -1984 011ke (863) 272 -3366 Cell From: Kraemer, Addie <Addie.Kraemer@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 11:30 AM To: Clark, Mark <Mark.Clark@dot.state.fl.us>; DeBoy, Brian T <Brian.Deboy@dot.state.fl.us> Cc: Hatton, Christopher <Christopher.Hatton@kimley-horn.com>; Sansaricq, Brandon <brandon.sansaricg@kimley- horn.com> Subject: Seminole Trail Government Center - FDOT Access EXTERNAL SENDER: Use caution with links and attachments. Good Morning Mark, Hope you are doing well! We are working on a project in Collier County along US 41 to propose up to 14,712 square feet of government office building use. We received comments from Collier County on January 21, 2021 to coordinate with FDOT regarding the proposed access and drainage along US 41. The site is located at 57257 Tamiami Trail. The site is currently vacant/not in use. The proposed plan includes relocating the existing driveway to the northwest to provide full -access to the government office building. US 41 is a Class 4 roadway in this vicinity with a speed of 60 mph. We understand that spacing criteria (660' for access connections) are not met at this location; however, it is requested that the proposed driveway location is approved as turn lanes are not warranted based on the anticipated turning volumes or through volumes according to the FDOT Driveway Information Guide and the methodologies for determining the need for left -turn lanes by the NCHRP. A summary of the transportation analysis is provided below: Trip Generation: The trip generation potential for the proposed development was based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, for land use code (LUC) 730 (Government Office Building). The proposed development is anticipated to generate up to 49 net, new external trips (37 entering, 12 exiting) during the a.m. peak -hour and 25 net, new external trips (6 entering, 19 exiting) during the p.m. peak -hour. Pass -by and internal capture trips were not considered in this analysis. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment: For the proposed government office building use, new traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development was distributed and assigned to the adjacent roadway of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) based upon Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) historical Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data for count station 030011. The distribution of project traffic is anticipated to be 50% from the east and 50% from the west along Tamiami Trail East (US 41). The FDOT AADT data attached for reference. Roadway Network Link Analysis: As indicated in the attached table, the directly -accessed roadway segment of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) from SR 29 to Dade County Line will not exceed 110% of the adopted service capacity with or without the addition of the proposed project trips. Turn Lane Review: Based upon the FDOT Driveway Information Guide, a right -turn lane may be warranted for a roadway with a speed limit of 45 miles per hour or greater if the right -turn volume is between 35 and 55 vehicles during the peak hour. No more than 19 ingress, westbound right -turns per hour are anticipated during the peak -hours; therefore, an exclusive right -turn lane is not warranted at the project driveway. Exclusive left -turn lanes are not provided in the vicinity of the development along the segment of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and no more than 19 ingress, eastbound left -turns are anticipated during the peak -hours; therefore, an exclusive left -turn lane is not recommended at the project driveway. Please let us know if you have any questions or if we need to set up a call to discuss. Thank you so much! Addie Addie Kraemer, P.E. Kimley-Horn 1 655 North Franklin Street, Suite 150, Tampa, FL 33602 Direct: 813 635 5517 1 Mobile: 561 319 4759 Connect with us: Twitter I Linkedln I Facebook I Instagram I Kimley-Horn.com » » f�.<•t„ §»� 5 .> —t» _" > »> < — �.t•»> <— —fi —fi FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 0011 - US 41, 200 FT. EAST OF CR-94 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2018 ---------- 2200 ------------ C E 1100 ------------ W 1100 --------- 9.50 -------- 54.30 -------- 13.40 2017 2300 C E 1100 W 1200 9.50 54.30 14.30 2016 2500 F E 1200 W 1300 9.50 54.00 14.30 2015 2500 C E 1200 W 1300 9.50 55.10 14.30 2014 2200 C E 1100 W 1100 9.50 54.40 15.80 2013 1800 C E 900 W 900 9.50 53.70 14.60 2012 1900 C E 950 W 950 9.50 53.90 15.00 2011 2100 C E 1100 W 1000 9.50 54.40 17.70 2010 2500 C E 1300 W 1200 14.93 58.21 13.10 2009 2300 C E 1100 W 1200 17.92 56.41 13.60 2008 2200 C E 1100 W 1100 12.25 52.91 14.90 2007 2500 F E 1200 W 1300 13.73 58.83 18.00 2006 2500 C E 1200 W 1300 13.54 62.92 18.00 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergoy.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes TRANSPORTATION: PL 20190000223 P) TIS: Transportation review requires a TIS (Traffic Impact Statement) for transportation concurrency (adequacy of roadway capacity) and for trip banking (reservation of road capacity). TIS Methodology: Please submit a TIS Methodology by email to Cecilia.Varga@colliercountyfl.gov or call 239.252.2613 to discuss. LUC 730, Gross Floor Area vs. No. of Employees, choose the higher generator of the two. TIS Fees: TIS Methodology $500 TIS Scale Study TBD Supporting Data: 2018 Collier County AUIRs 10th Ed. ITE Trip Generation Manual Other: Existing access point c:ply. TIS to be shared with FDOT Turn Lane Analysis based on FDOT criteria Please contact FDOT, Jlark Clark @ {239 225 -1984 or Mark.Clark@dot.state.fl.us for access points and turn lane rec;uirements on US 41. and Brian DeBo 239 985-7807 or Brian. Deboy@dot. state fl us for ROW and drainage permitting. Attachment "F" Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts Peak 2019 2020 2019 2019 2020 2020 Traffic Hour' Peak Peak 2020 2020 2020 Counts+ 2020 w/TB Counts Trip Bank Peak Dir Hour Hour Net Percent Total Counts+ Trip Bank Counts+ L Year Year Exist Cat. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Change Change Trip Trip Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected ID# Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std * Dir Volume Volume Volume In Volume In Volume Bank Volume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient 51.0 gston Road hnperial Street Immokalee Road 6/4D 673 D N 3,000 1230 1410 180 14.63% 86 1496 1504 49.9% B 52.0 ngston Road hnmokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 1800 2220 420 23.33% 22 2242 858 72.3% C 53.0 ngston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E N 3,100 1500 1560 60 4.00 % 0 1560 1540 50.3 % B 54.0 7N. ngston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 31100 1490 1330 (160) -10.74% 50 1380 1720 44.5 % B 55.0 ngston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 687 E N 31000 1490 1820 330 22.15% 23 1843 1157 61.4% C 58.0s[ Street New Market Road SR-29 (Main Street) 2U 590 D N 900 680 650 (30) -4.41% 24 674 226 749% C 59.0 Mket Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 540 570 30 5.56% 28 598 302 66.4% C 61.0p Keais Oil Well Road hnmokalee Road 2U 626A D S 1,000 280 280 0 0.00% 211 491 509 49.1 % B 62.0 CR887 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 11000 1070 1120 50 4.671% 9 1129 (129) 112.9% F Existing Existing 63.0 CR896 Seagate Drive Cmyton Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4D 511 D E 1,7001 1030 990 (40) -3.88%1 0 990 710 58.29/6 C 64.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 61) 512 E E 2,800 1910 19501 40 2.09 % 16 1966 834 70.2% C 65.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E E 2,800 2000 2430 430 21.50%1 19 2449 351 87.5% D 2027 66.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 2910 3230 320 11.00% 20 3250 (450) 116.1% F Existing Existing 67.1 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 526 E E 31900 2980 3540 560 18.79% 17 3557 343 91.2% D 2025 2025 67.2 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road I-75 6D 628 E E 3,900 3020 3130 110 3.649/6 70 3200 700 82.1% D 68.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2160 2400 240 11.11 % 126 2526 274 90.2% D 2026 69.0 CR856 Radio Road Airport Road Livingston Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1180 1160 (20) -1.69% 57 1217 583 67.6% C 70.0 CR856 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1120 1440 320 28.57% 30 1470 330 81.7% D 71.0 CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 4D 685 D W 1,800 710 690 (20) -2.82% 130 820 980 45.6% B 72.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulevard 41) 516 D E 1,800 1030 1080 50 4.85% 125 1205 595 66.9% C 73.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road 41) 517 D E 1,800 760 8401 80 10.53%1 99 939 861 52.2% B 74.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road County Bam Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D E 11900 720 800 80 11.11% 85 885 1015 46.6% B 75.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E W 2,900 590 740 150 25.42% 172 912 1989 31.4% B 76.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 1620 1590 (30) -1.85% 0 1590 510 75.79/6 C 77.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkwav Radio Road 6D 528 E N 3,100 1960 2240 280 14.29% 54 2294 806 74.0% C 78.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3,100 1420 1480 60 4.23% 255 1735 1365 56.0% C 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake -Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,1001 980 940 (40) -4.081% 252 1192 1908 38.5% B 80.0 SR29 SR 29 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 2U 615A D N gool 140 150 10 7.14% 0 150 750 16.7 % B 81.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) I-75 2U 615A D N 900 140 150 10 7.14% 0 150 750 16.7% B 82.0 SR29 SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Road 2U 615A D N 900 140 1501 10 7.14%1 67 217 683 24.1% B 83.0 SR29 SR 29 Oil Well Road CR 29A South 2U 665A D N 900 410 420 10 2.44% 79 499 401 55.4% B 84.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South 9th Street 4D 664 D W 1,700 590 620 30 5.08% 132 752 948 44.2 % B 85.0 SR29 SR 29 9th Street CR 29A North 2U 663 D S 900 620 650 30 4.84% 74 724 176 80.49/6 D 86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D S 900 620 650 30 4.84% 68 718 182 79.8% D 87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A D S 800 380 390 10 2.63% 10 400 400 50.0% B 88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 2U 661A D S 800 750 790 40 5.331% 55 845 (45) 105.6% E 2021 Existing 91.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E 2,9001 1580 1610 30 1.90% 112 1722 1178 59.4 % C 92.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2230 2780 550 24.66% 335 3115 (215) 107.4% F 2023 Existing 93.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard 61) 572 E E 3,000 1860 19801 120 6.45%1 530 2510 1 490 83.7 % 1 D 94.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 571 E E 3,000 1470 1690 220 14.97% 357 2047 953 68.2 % C 95.1 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard Joseph Lane 6D 608 D E 3,100 1040 900 (140) -13.46% 558 1458 1642 47.0% B 95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane Greenway Road 4D 609 D E 2,000 1040 900 (140) -13.46% 275 1175 825 58.8 % C 95.3 US41 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road San Marco Drive 2U 608 D E 1,075 1040 900 (140) -13.46% 157 1057 18 98.3% D 2025 2021 96.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Mazes Drive SR 29 2U 617A D E 1,000 220 220 0 0.00% 6 226 774 22.6% B 97.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East SR 29 -10jr- Dade County Line 2U 616A D E-1 M NW8 198 802 19.81% B 98.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee Countv Line Wiggins Pass Road 6D 546 E N 31100 2110 2150 40 1.901% 57 2207 893 71.2% C 99.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road hnmokalee Road 6D 564 E N 3,100 2720 2920 200 7.35 % 541 2974 126 95.99/6 E 2024 2023 100.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North hnmokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 1 E • N 1 3,4101 1790 19501 160 8.94% 18 1968 1442 57.7% C 101.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 6D 563 E N 3,100 2250 2600 350 15.56% 10 2610 490 84.2% D 2029 102.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North GulfPark Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 562 E * N 3,410 2190 2340 150 6.85% 0 2340 1070 68.6 % C 108.0 Thomasson Drive Bayshore Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 698 D E 800 550 590 40 7.271% 70 660 140 82.5% D 109.0 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulfshore Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U/4D 524 E * E 1,540 930 1160 230 24.73% 13 1173 367 76.29/6 D 110.1 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 4D 646 D E 1,900 1480 1600 120 8.11% 14 1614 286 84.9% D 2029 110.2 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 4D/6D 666 D E 2,500 1760 1770 10 0.57% 61 1831 669 73.2% C 111.1 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 579 E E 31000 1920 2710 790 41.15% 4 2714 286 90.5 % D 2023 2023 111.2 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Road Logan Blvd. 6D 668 E E 3,000 2210 2420 210 9.50% 64 2484 516 82.8 % D 2025 112.0 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 580 E E 3,000 1640 1950 310 18.90% 133 2083 917 69.4% C 114.0 CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Bonita Beach Road Wiggins Pass Road 2U 548 D N 1,000 458 390 (68) -14.85% 33 423 577 42.3% B 115.0 CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Wiggins Pass Road 111th Avenue 2U 578 D N 1,000 458 400 (58) -12,66% 13 413 587 41.3% B 1160 Westclox Road Carson Road SR 29 2U 611 D W 800 200 220 20 10.001% 0 220 590 27.5% B 117.0 CR888 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 669 1 D I E 1,000 448 420 (28) -6.25% 27 447 553 44.7% B Attach nrut "F" Collier County 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts Peak 2018 2019 2018 2019 2019 2019 Tragic 1/7"Trip Hour' Peak Peak 2018 to 2018 to 1/7th 2019 1/^,'h 2019 Counts+ 2019 w11B Count Bank Peak Dir Hour Hour 2019 2019 Total 1/7th TB 2019 1/7' Total Counts+ 1/7th TB Counts+ L Year Year Exist Car. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Net Percent Trip 2018 Trip Trip Trip 1/T"TB Remaining Ino TB O Expected Expected 47.0 lake Trafford Road Carson Rd SR 29 2U 609 D E 800 500 460 (40) -8.00% 51 551 44 4 48 508 292 63.5% C 48.0 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 2U 587 D N 1,000 670 640 (30) -0.48% 33 703 49 19 68 708 292 70.8% C 49.0 Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 4D 588 D S 1,900 16I0 1500 (110) -6.83% 0 I610 0 0 0 1500 400 78.9% D 50.0 Logan Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 11000 570 600 30 5.26% 59 629 29 30 59 659 341 65.9% C SLO CR881 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalce Road 6/4D 673 D N 3,000 1260 1230 (30) -2.38% 61 1321 59 0 59 1289 1711 43.0% B 52.0 CR881 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 31100 1640 1800 160 9.76% 28 1669 26 0 26 1826 1274 58.9% C 53.0 CR881 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E S 3,100 1490 1500 10 0.67% 4 1494 6 0 6 1506 1594 48.6% B 54.0 CR881 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gaze Parkway 6D 690 E N 3,100 1530 1490 (40) -2.61% 46 1576 35 0 35 1525 1575 49.2% B 55.0 CR881 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 687 E N 3,000 I330 1490 160 12.03% 8 1338 32 0 32 1522 1478 50.7% B 58.0 N. 1st Street New Market Road SR-29 (Main Street) 2U 590 D N 900 630 680 50 7.94% 26 656 13 8 21 701 199 77.9% D 2028 59.0 New Market Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 590 540 (50) -8.47% 15 605 15 5 20 560 340 62.2% C 61.0 Camp Keais Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 2U 626A D S 1,000 260 280 20 7.69% 204 464 132 72 204 484 516 48.4% B 62.0 CR887 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41(Tamiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 1,000 1070 1070 0 0.00% 40 I110 29 0 29 1099 (99) 109.9% F Existin Existin 63.0 CR896 Seagate Drive Cmyton Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4D 511 D E 1,700 1060 1030 (30) -2.830% 0 1060 0 0 0 1030 670 60.6 % C 64.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodleke-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2,800 1990 1910 (80) -4.02% 6 1996 6 0 6 1916 884 68.4% C 65.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E W 2,800 1980 2000 20 1.01% 6 1986 6 0 6 2006 794 71.6% C 66.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road ShirleyStreet Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 2470 2910 440 17.81% 24 2494 24 0 24 2934 (134) 104.8% F Existing Existing 67.1 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 526 E E 3,000 26I0 2980 370 14.18% 29 2639 23 0 23 3003 (3) 100.1% F 2020 Existing 67.2 60201 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road I-75 6D 628 E E 3,000 3030 3020 (10) -0.33% 112 3142 40 0 40 3060 (60) 102.0% F Existing Existing 68.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2190 2160 (30) -1.37% 1 2191 1 0 1 2161 639 77.2% D 69.0 CR856 Radio Road Airport Road Livin star Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1180 1180 0 0.00% 3 1183 6 0 6 1186 614 65.9% C 70.0 CR856 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 I170 1120 (50) 4.27% 6 1176 27 0 27 1147 653 63.7% C 71.0 CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 4D 685 D W 1,800 640 710 70 10.94% 142 782 54 85 139 849 951 47.2% B 72.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D W 1,800 1030 1030 0 0.00% 143 1173 141 11 152 1182 618 65.7% C 73.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Bran Road 4D 517 D W 1,800 830 760 (70) -8.43% 119 949 117 11 1281 888 912 49.3% B 74.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D W 1,900 760 720 (40) -5.26% 87 847 82 18 100 820 1080 43.2% B 75.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E W 2,900 530 590 60 11.32% 170 700 88 75 163 753 2147 26.0% B 76.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 I240 1620 380 30.65% 0 1240 0 0 0 1620 480 77.1% D 77.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 528 E N 3,100 I880 1960 80 4.26% 54 1934 54 0 54 2014 1086 65.0% C 78.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3,100 I450 1420 (30) -2.07% 221 1671 241 0 241 1661 1439 53.6% C 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rat0esnakaHammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,100 950 980 30 3.16% 139 1089 220 0 220 1200 1900 38.7% B 80.0 SR29 SR29 US 41(Tamiarri Trail) CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 2U 615A D N 900 130 140 10 7.69% 0 130 0 0 0 I40 760 15.6% B 81.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 1-75 2U 615A D N 900 130 140 10 7.69% 0 130 0 0 0 I40 760 15.6% B 82.0 SR29 SR 29 1-75 Oil Well Road 2U 615A D C N 430 130 I40 10 7.69% 85 215 45 34 79 219 211 50.9% B 83.0 SR29 SR 29 Oil Well Road CR 29A South 2U 665A D C N 430 410 410 0 0.00% 84 494 39 30 69 479 (49) 111.4% F 2022 Existing 94.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South 9th Street 4D 664 DC W 525 620 590 (30) -4.84% 131 751 82 37 119 709 (184) 135.0% F Existing Existing 85.0 SR29 SR 29 90r Street CR 29A North 2U 663 DC S 783 630 620 (10) -1.59% 96 726 71 24 95 715 68 91.3a/" D 2025 86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D C S 850 630 620 (10) -1.59 % 73 703 43 23 66 686 164 80.7% D 87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A ;)C S 430 370 380 10 2.70h/o 11 381 6 4 10 390 40 90.7% D 2025 88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 2U 661A D C S 850 740 750 10 1.35 % 58 798 32 17 49 799 51 94.0% D 2023 91.0 U941 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E 2,900 1920 1580 (340) -17.71% 126 2046 137 2 IN 1719 1181 59.3% C 92.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2,460 2230 (230) -9.35% 373 2833 247 80 327 2557 343 88.2% D 2027 93.0 U941 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard 6D 572 E E 3,000 19401 1860 (80) -4.12% 632 2572 481 135 616 2476 524 82.5% D 94.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 571 E E 3,000 17001 1470 (230) -13.53% 442 2142 357 91 448 1918 1082 63.9% C 95.1 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard Joseph Lane 6D W8 D E 3,100 990 1040 50 5.05% 564 1554 550 30 580 1620 1480 52.30/6 B 95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane Greenwrey Road 4D 608 D E 2,000 990 1040 50 5.05% 146 1136 199 79 278 1318 682 65.9"/o C 95.3 U941 Tamiami Trail Fast Greenway Road San Marco Drive 2U 608 D E 1,075 990 1040 50 5.05% 85 1075 128 27 155 1195 (120) 111.2% F 2020 Existing 96.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Marco Drive SR 29 2U 617A D E 1,000 200 220 20 10.00% 0 200 6 0 6 226 774 22.6% B 1 Tamiami Trail East SIM Dade County Line 2U 616A D E 1,000 I70 190 20 11.760% 0 170 0 0 0 190 810 19.0% B 98.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 6D 546 E N 3,100 2250 2110 (140) -6.22% 67 2317 49 8 57 2167 933 69.9% C 99.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalce Road 6D 564 E N 3,100 3000 2720 (280) -9.33% 34 3034 26 8 34 2754 346 88.80/6 D 2026 I00.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E N 3,100 1920 1790 (130) -6.77%1 16 1936 15 0 15 1805 1295 58.2% C I01.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 6D 563 E N 3,100 2460 2250 (210) -8.54% 1 2461 1 0 1 2251 849 72.6% C IO2.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 562 E N 3,100 2010 21901 180 8.96%1 2 1 2012 1 0 1 2191 909 70.7% C I08.0 Thomason Drive Baysho a Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 698 D E 1 8001 5101 5501 40 1 7.94%1 109 1 619 96 4 100 650 150 81.3% D MASTER Attachment F-2019 (070319.1).xlsm M Natural Resource Assessment Tamiami Government Center Collier County, Florida January 2020 Prepared for: Seminole Tribe of Florida 043239003 January 2020 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 CA Number 00000696 445 24"' Street, Suite 200 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)794-4100 Kimley)))Horn TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 2.0 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS................................................................................................ 3.1 SOILS............................................................................................................................... 3.2 LAND COVER AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES...................................................... 3.3 WETLANDS, TIDAL WATERS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS ......................... 3.4 WILDLIFE UTILIZATION............................................................................................. 3.5 ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN ............ 3.6 HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................ 3.7 FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION.................................................................................... 4.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS................................................................................ 4.1 LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCES............................................................... 4.2 STATE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS................................................................... 4.3 FEDERAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS............................................................. 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................... ....................1 .................... 4 .................... 5 ....................6 ....................6 ....................6 ....................9 ....................9 ..................15 ..................15 ..................17 ..................17 ..................17 ..................18 .................. 20 Figure1: Project Location Map.........................................................................................................2 Figure 2: USGS 7.5-M inute Quadrangle Map.................................................................................. 3 Figure3: Wildlife Survey Transect Map ...........................................................................................5 Figure4: Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) Map............ 8 Figure5: FEM A Flood Zones M ap ................................................................................................... 16 TABLES Table 1: Potential Listed Species Occurrence 10 Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL i January 2020 APPENDICES Appendix A — FNAI Data Report (Unofficial) Appendix B — USFWS IPaC Trust Resources Report Appendix C — Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake Appendix D — SHPO Florida Master Site File Report Appendix E — UMAM Data Forms and USACE Data Sheets Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL ii January 2020 Natural Resource Assessment Technical Memorandum Tamiami Government Center Collier County, Florida 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following technical memorandum summarizes a review of readily available documentation and the results of field reconnaissance conducted at the project site. The purpose of this Natural Resource Assessment was to characterize the existing conditions of the project site relative to threatened and endangered species and their habitat, ecological communities, land cover and vegetation, wetlands, soils, hydrology, archaeological and historical resources, and floodplains. The scope of work also included a brief review of regulatory requirements, an assessment of the existing wetlands, and an evaluation of potential mitigation costs. The project site is located north of Tamiami Trail in Collier County, Florida (Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East). A site location map is attached as Figure 1. The project site has been previously developed into a religious center. A portion of the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) 7.5- Minute Perry, Florida quadrangle map depicting the location of the subject site is attached as Figure 2. Site elevations, typically mapped on the USGS quad, was not available for the project site due to the presence of wetlands within and surrounding the project site. Also shown on the USGS map is a Trail Gospel Center, which was located on the project site, and an adjacent Indian Village. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 1 January 2020 S. Taylor Wildlife Management Big Cypress Area National Preserve Project Location Miccosukee Indian Village i Service Layer Credits: © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-*V-r A " " US 41 US 41 Legend Project Limits 0 250 500 Feet Project Location Ma Kimley>>> Horn Seminole Tribe of Florida Tamiami Government Center © 2020 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 57257 US-41 445 24th Street, Suite 200, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Ocho ee FL Phone (772) 794-4100 Fax (561) 863-8175 www.kimley-hom.com 1 inch = 500 feet PROJECT NUMBER: 043239003 JANUARY2020 FIGURE 1 000101mr--1 Feet 0 500 -- —' All, _.ILIA- LIJ tiCenta r- -,ij- Wj. -ALW r• y _l�l. fir .ti _ � � � � -_ — i,►i,. All, U,. rE — �, t r1 r` _sll:` A _ all- ,,nel eZ g `_' �i11. t _ .rWl— r1�16, �►ll� �1JJa_ m —tea• h+•�+'LLLL l �1i1�- Ah— y tilt• 1I' L_ AIL w Legend Q Project Limits Y - Source: Map provided by USGS Kim ley >>> H or n USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Ma Seminole Tribe of Florida Tamiami Government Center © 2020 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 57257 US-41 445 24th Street, Suite 200, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Ochopee, FL Phone (772) 794-4100 1 inch = 650 feet PROJECT NUMBER: 043239003 JANUARY 2020 FIGURE 2 wwwkimley-horn.com 2.0 METHODOLOGY The methodology for this updated assessment included a review of the following resources: ■ Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) Biodiversity Matrix (htV://www.fnai.ora/biointro.cft) ■ Various Geographic Information System (GIS) data layers from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) [(http://legacy.myfwc.com/bba/data/default.asp)and (https://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx)] ■ USFWS IPaC Trust Resources Report (https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/) ■ U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) / Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) ■ State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Florida Master Site File (hlt2://www.flheritage.com/) ■ USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Maps (Web -based maps available from http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/mapper.html) ■ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM; Web -based maps available from http://msc.fema.govb ■ United States Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangle Maps, Land Boundary Information System (LABINS; http://www.labins.org) ■ South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) GIS data, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) MapDirect GIS ■ Collier County Land Development Code ■ Wetland delineation was conducted as part of the field reconnaissance based on the Florida unified wetland delineation methodologies in accordance with Chapter 62-340, Florida Administrative Code (FAC) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. Field visits were conducted on June 21, 2018 and June 19, 2019. The pedestrian transects walked during the June 19, 2019 site visit are shown on Figure 3. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 4 January 2020 momor= Feet 0 50 Legend Florida bonneted bat Transects (August 2019) Wildlife Transects (August 2019) QProject Limits ~' Wildlife Survey Transects Map Kimley>>> Horn Seminole Tribe of Florida Tamiami Government Center © 2020 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 57257 US-41 445 24th Street, Suite 200, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Ochopee, FL Phone (772) 794-4100 www.kimley-hom.com 1 inch = 67 feet PROJECT NUMBER: 043239003 1 JANUARY 2020 FIGURE 3 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 SOILS The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) / Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida, does not have any soil data for the project site. On -site excavation of soils found rocky fill soil in the uplands and hydric soils within the wetlands. 3.2 LAND COVER AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES Vegetative communities within the project site were identified through pedestrian transects and aerial photograph interpretation. Vegetative communities were classified according to the Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS, Florida Department of Transportation, 1999) and the FLUCFCS map was updated from the 2014 mapping (See Figure 4). A description of the upland land cover, included below, characterizes dominant vegetation observed along random pedestrian transects, and does not represent an all-inclusive vegetative inventory. The acreage provided for each land cover is approximate, based on aerial interpretation. FL UCFCS 740 —Disturbed Land (fl. 06 Ac.) This land use type is found within the previously developed sections of the project site. Historic aerial photography shows that the project site was developed prior to 1980. Vegetation found within this area is made up of sparsely distributed white top sedge (Rhynchospora colorata), torpedo grass (Panicum repens), and St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum). This area is littered with various debris across the site, including tires, oil tanks, buckets, and rocks. 3.3 WETLANDS, TIDAL WATERS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS The presence of wetlands was evaluated based on the Florida unified wetland delineation methodologies in accordance with Chapter 62-340, Florida Administrative Code (FAC) and the U.S. USACE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. These methods consider prevalence of wetland vegetation, hydric soil indicators, and wetland hydrology. Based on an assessment of the vegetative communities, hydrologic conditions, and soils observed during field reconnaissance, wetlands do occur within the proposed project site. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 6 January 2020 FLUCFCS 617 — Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (f0.12 Ac.) This land use type is located along the northern and eastern edge of the property. Vegetation consists of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), cocoplum (Chrysoblanus icaco), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), strangler fig (Ficus aurea), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera) and scattered cypress (Toxodium spp). FLUCFCS 621— Cypress (f0.58 Ac.) This land use type comprises the northwestern portion of the project site consisting almost exclusively of mature cypress trees with standing water within. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 7 January 2020 11z Legend pr 4' N. 61 J Feet 0 70 1W FLUCFCS Code: Description 617: Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (±0.12 ac.) w 621: Cypress (±0.58 ac.) ca >_ 740: Disturbed Land (±1.06 ac.) Y Source: Aerial courtesy of ESRI Florida Land Use, Cover, Forms and Classification System Ma Kimley>>> Horn Seminole Tribe of Florida Tamiami Government Center © 2020 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 57257 US-4 aI 445 24th Street, Suite 200, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Ochopee, FL Phone (772) 794-4100 www.kimley-hom.com 1 inch = 70 feet PROJECT NUMBER: 043239003 JANUARY 2020 FIGURE 4 3.4 WILDLIFE UTILIZATION Evidence of wildlife utilization observed during field reconnaissance included turkey vulture, American crow, red -shouldered hawk, lubber grasshopper, and the American alligator. 3.5 ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN A listing of species potentially occurring within the project vicinity was reviewed using the databases described in the Section 2.1 Methodology. The results of the database review are as follows: FNAI — FNAI found one documented listed species occurrence, the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) (see Appendix A — FNAI Data Report). The following listed plants were noted by FNAI as possibly occurring in the project areas (as summarized in Table 1, below): Blodgett's wild -mercury, Cuban snake -bark, few -flowered fingergrass, clamshell orchid, pineland jacquemontia, Small's flax, climbing vine fern, Florida royal palm, and Florida filmy fern. None of the above -listed plant species, or any other protected plant species, were observed during the August 2018 and August 2019 site inspections. FWC — There are no known bald eagle nests within five miles from the project site. The closest wading bird rookery is located approximately 1.7 miles northwest of the project site. There are no known listed species observations recorded by FWC within two miles from the site. USFWS Consultation Areas — The project site is within the USFWS consultation areas for the Audubon's crested caracara, Florida panther, Florida bonneted bat, and Everglade snail kite. USFWS Wood Stork Colonies — The project site is within 8 wood stork core foraging areas (CFAs): Jetport, Jetport South, L-28 Crossover North, L-28 Crossover South, L-28 Gap, Big Cypress Mitchell Landing, Cabbage Bay, and Lostmans Creek. A CFA within Collier County is 18.6 miles. USFWS IaPC Data — Several species were included in the IPaC Trust Resources Report because USFWS includes historic data. However, when comparing current conditions for the project site, it was determined that many of these species would not occur within the site (e.g. West Indian manatee, piping plover, red cockaded woodpecker, loggerhead sea turtle, and Gulf sturgeon). Therefore, these Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 9 January 2020 species are not discussed further in the document (see Appendix B — USFWS IPaC Trust Resources Report). USFWS Critical Habitat- The project site is not within any USFWS critical habitats. Based on field reconnaissance and database reviews, a listing of the state and federally listed species potentially occurring within the immediate vicinity of the project site has been compiled. Table 1 lists species that may occur and their likelihood of occurrence. Likelihood of occurrence is based on actual observation of the species, sign of the species (burrows, tracks, scat, etc.), observance of suitable habitat, or documented occurrences of the species within various databases. .1 ,TI 1 Scientific Federal State Likelihood of Common Name Comments Name Status Status Occurrence Observed On -site: No Florida panther Puma concolor E FE Observed in Proximity: No Medium coryi Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Mammals Florida bonneted Eumops floridanus E FE Observed in Proximity: No Medium bat Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Roosting and foraging Observed On -site: No Florida black Ursus americanus NL * NL * Observed in Proximity: No Low bear floridanus Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Denning and foraging Observed On -site: No West Indian Trichechus T FT Observed in Proximity: No None manatee manatus Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Red -cockaded Picoidea borealis E FE Observed in Proximity: No None woodpecker Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Everglade snail Rostrhamus E FE Observed in Proximity: No None kite sociabilis Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Birds Ammodramus Observed On -site: No Cape Sable maritimus E FE Observed in Proximity: No None seaside sparrow mariabilis Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Florida Ammodramus Observed On -site: No grasshopper savannarum E FE Observed in Proximity: No None sparrow floridanus Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 10 January 2020 Observed On -site: No Kirtland's Setophaga E FE Observed in Proximity: No None warbler kirtlandii Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Red knot Calidris canutus T FT Observed in Proximity: No None -fa Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Roseate Platalea ajaja NL ST Observed in Proximity: No Medium spoonbill Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Nesting and Foraging Observed On -site: No Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor NL ST Observed in Proximity: No Medium Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Nesting and Foraging Observed On -site: No Little blue heron Egretta caerulea NL ST Observed in Proximity: No Medium Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Nesting and Foraging Observed On -site: No Piping plover Charadrius T FT Observed in Proximity: No None melodus Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Wood stork Mycteria T FT Observed in Proximity: No Medium americana Habitat present: Marginal Habitat Type: Marginal Foraging Observed On -site: No Audubon's Polyborus plancus T FT Observed in Proximity: No Low crested caracara audubonii Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A ?Marginal foraging? Observed On -site: No Florida Athene cunicularia NL ST Observed in Proximity: No None burrowing owl floridana Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Florida sandhill Grus Canadensis NL ST Observed in Proximity: No Low crane pratensis Habitat present: Marginal Habitat Type: Marginal Foraging Observed On -site: No Bald eagle Haliaeetus NL** NL** Observed in Proximity: No Low leucocephalus Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Nesting and limited foraging Observed On -site: No Eastern indigo Drymarchon Observed in Proximity: No snake couperi T FT Habitat present: Marginal Low Habitat Type: Marginal Foraging Observed On -site: No Gopher tortoise Gopherus C ST Observed in Proximity: No None polyphemus Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: Yes Reptiles American Alligator T(S/A) FT Observed in Proximity: No High alligator mississippiensis Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Nesting and foraging Observed On -site: No American Crocodylus acutus T FT Observed in Proximity: No Medium crocodile Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: Nesting and fora mi Observed On -site: No Loggerhead sea Caretta caretta T FT Observed in Proximity: No None turtle Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 11 January 2020 Observed On -site: No Blodgett's Wild- Argythamnia C SE Observed in Proximity: No None mercury blodgettii Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Cuban Snake- Colubrina cubensis NL SE Observed in Proximity: No None bark var. floridana Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Few -flowered Digitaria C SE Observed in Proximity: No None fingergrass paucii fora Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Clamshell orchid Encyclia cochleate NL SE Observed in Proximity: No Medium Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Pineland Jacquemontia NL ST Observed in Proximity: No None jacquemontia curtissii Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Plants Small's flax Linum carteri NL SE Observed in Proximity: No None Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Climbing vine Microgramma NL SE Observed in Proximity: No None fern heterophylla Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Florida royal Roystonea elata NL SE Observed in Proximity: No Low palm Habitat present: Yes Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Florida filmy Trichomanes E FE Observed in Proximity: No None fern punctatum Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Dalea Observed On -site: No Florida prairie- carthagenensis E FE Observed in Proximity: No None clover floridana Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Garber's spurge Chamaesyce T FT Observed in Proximity: No None garberi Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Bartram's Observed On -site: No hairstreak Strymon acis E FE Observed in Proximity: No None butterfly bartrami Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Insects Florida leafwing Anaea troglodyte E FE Observed in Proximity: No None butterfly Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A Observed On -site: No Miami blue Cyclargus thomasi E FE Observed in Proximity: No None butterfly bethunebakeri Habitat present: No Habitat Type: N/A 1 Based on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species updated December 2018 available on hU://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/imperiled/. Federal Status: E — Endangered; T — Threatened; T(S/A) — Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance; C — Candidate Species; NL — Not Listed State Status: FE — Federally Endangered; FT — Federally Threatened; FT(S/A) — Federally Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance; ST — State Threatened. Note: Coordination is not required with FWC for federally listed species. *The Florida black bear is protected by F.A.C. 68A-4.009. **The bald eagle is still protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 12 January 2020 Based on the database review and field reconnaissance the following species could occur on -site or require additional evaluation, survey or permitting Florida Panther Florida panthers are located primarily in southwest Florida, south of the Caloosahatche River. The project site does fall within the Primary Zone for the panther. Based on the Florida Panther Effect Determination Key, the proposed project will qualify for a may affect determination. Coordination with the USFWS will be required and a Biological Opinion for the species will likely need to be submitted to the USFWS. Florida Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest bat species endemic to Florida. This species only occurs in south Florida (Miami -Dade, Broward, Collier, Hendry, Lee, Charlotte, Glades, Highlands, Desoto, and Polk counties). This species is known to roost in natural tree cavities and tree cavities created by woodpeckers and other species. The project site is within the USFWS consultation area for the Florida bonneted bat. No individuals were observed during field reconnaissance. A formal Florida bonneted bat roost survey was conducted on June 19, 2019. Per the USFWS Draft Protocol for Florida Bonneted Bat Roost Surveys, a survey was conducted throughout the project site and two on - site snags were observed to have cavities within the site. Both snags were then scoped with a cavity peeper camera. No bats, guano, or evidence of bats were observed within the on -site cavities. In addition to on -site natural structures, one artificial structure is present on the project site in the form of a dilapidated building. The majority of the roof structure has caved in and provided minimal habitat for the Florida bonneted bat. Regardless, the building was inspected for guano and cavities and an auditory inspection was conducted for the Florida bonneted bat chirping sounds. No guano, cavities, or chirping was observed within the building. Based on the results of the Florida bonneted bat survey, it is not anticipated that the project site is being utilized by the Florida bonneted bat. Coordination with the USFWS is recommended regarding the results of the Florida bonneted bat survey prior to site development to ensure no further surveying for the bat would be required. Wood Stork Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 13 January 2020 Although this species was not observed during field reconnaissance, there is marginal habitat for this species on -site in the forested wetlands. This habitat type could provide foraging habitat for the wood stork. Because impacts are proposed to the wetlands, mitigation will be required for the loss of wood stork habitat. However, wetland mitigation required will likely be sufficient to offset the lost wood stork habitat. Audubon's Crested Caracara Audubon's crested caracaras are long legged birds with a black crown or crest, red facial skin, white and black banded tail with a wide, dark terminal band and have black and white barring at the base of the primaries. Immature caracaras are similar in appearance but duller in color. Caracaras prefer open land including pastures and dry prairie with cabbage palm and/or live oak hammocks and shallow ponds or sloughs. Nesting occurs within cabbage palm trees or live oaks, if cabbage palms are not present. Two to three eggs are laid in late winter and typically a pair will maintain the same territory for several years. They feed on reptiles, birds, mammals and carrion. Loss of habitat from improved pastures and citrus has contributed to the species decline. Although the project is located within the USFWS consultation area, habitat is not present within the site and no individuals were observed during field reconnaissance. No further action should be required. Eastern Indigo Snake Although this species was not observed during field reconnaissance, there is some marginal habitat for this species. Based on the Eastern Indigo Snake Programmatic Effect Determination Key — South Florida (July 2017), the proposed project will qualify for a may affect, not likely to adversely affect determination if it incorporates the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake during construction because this project will impact less than 25 acres of xeric habitat and there are no gopher tortoise burrows within the site. Standard protection measures, Appendix C, include signage and educational materials made available to construction personnel. With the implementation of these standard protection measures and because impacts will not occur to more than 25 acres of indigo snake habitat, no further action is required regarding this species. Listed Plant Species The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Service's Notes on Florida's Threatened and Endangered Plants, was consulted to assess habitat requirements for listed plant species. Six (6) state - Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 14 January 2020 listed plants and three (3) federally -listed plants were noted by FNAI as possibly occurring in this area. None were observed during field reconnaissance. The site has been disturbed and there is limited suitable habitat for listed plant species. No further action will be required regarding listed plant species. 3.6 HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Kimley-Horn requested an inquiry from the Department of State, State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) Division of Historical Resources Florida Master Site File (FMSF) regarding the presence of known historical or archaeological findings within the site (see Appendix D). Data was also reviewed from the SHPO FMSF available from the Florida Geographic Data Library (http://www.fgdl.org). The FMSF indicates that there are two archeological sites, two resource groups, and one historical structure within the project vicinity. US-41 and the Tamiami Canal are both listed as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historical Places and may be impacted by development of the project site. Further coordination with SHPO and the Seminole Tribe is recommended before construction activities commence. 3.7 FLOODPLAININFORMATION The FEMA FIRM panel 1200671125D indicates that the project site is located within Zone D — areas determined to be outside of special flood hazard areas. Flood zone impacts will require floodplain compensation, which will be handled during the permitting process (see Section 4.2 State Regulatory Requirements below for more details). The FEMA flood zones are depicted in Figure S. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 15 January 2020 Feet 0 85 or-, - r, i al Legend 0 Project Limits w FEMA Flood Zone >_ Zone D: Area Located Outside Special Flood Hazard Area Y 1 \ Source: Flood zone data courtesv of FEMA FEMA Flood Zone FIRM Panel 1200671125D Ma Kimley>>> Horn Seminole Tribe of Florida Tamiami Government Center © 2020 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 57257 US-41 445 24th Street, Suite 200, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Ochopee, FL Phone (772) 794-4100 www.kimley-hom.com 1 inch = 85 feet PROJECT NUMBER: 043239003 JANUARY 2020 FIGURE 5 4.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 4.1 LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCES Based on a review of the municipal codes and ordinances for Collier County, there are environmental ordinances pertaining wetlands, wildlife habitat for rare and endangered species, and tree protection measures. In general, potential impacts to these resources are prohibited unless acceptable actions are permitted through the required agencies. A management plan must be created for all sites with listed species which potentially utilize the site. The project site falls within the Florida panther Primary zone. Collier County requires all development within primary panther zones to focus development to currently disturbed areas and avoid preferred panther habitats such as pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. Development of a management plan describing the Best Management Practices utilized during construction to avoid negative impacts to Florida panther habitat will be required. Any vegetation removal for the project will require a vegetation removal or vegetation removal and fill permit from the County. 4.2 STATE REGULATORYREQUIREMENTS Wetland and Stormwater Permitting Site development, including impacts to wetlands and surface waters, will require an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from SFWMD. A discussion of avoidance and minimization and a mitigation plan will be required. Mitigation could include on -site or off -site mitigation or purchase of mitigation bank credits. Mitigation would be required for the direct impacts as well as a negotiated secondary impact area (generally 25 feet from impact). For wetlands preserved on -site, a minimum 15-foot, average 25-foot buffer is required. If mitigation includes a purchase of mitigation bank credits, Panther Island Mitigation Bank Expansion services this area and has freshwater forested credits available for purchase. This bank has both state and federal credits available and uses the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). The forested credits are available for purchase for $95,000 per credit. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 17 January 2020 The onsite wetland systems were assessed based on the UMAM criteria and the UMAM composite score for the on -site cypress/mixed wetland hardwoods system was 0.70 (see Appendix E — UMAM Data Forms). The UMAM scores provided are subject to review and approval by the SFWMD and the mitigation cost is approximate for budgeting purposes. If SFWMD accepts this UMAM score and the anticipated 0.20 acres of wetland (based on the most current site plan) will be impacted, the functional loss of this wetland would be 0.14. Therefore, if purchasing credits at Panther Island Mitigation Bank, the cost for direct impacts only would be approximately $13,300 (0.14 x 95,000 = 13,300). This does not include secondary impacts to the wetlands, which will be determined during permitting. State Listed Species Permitting No state listed species were observed thus, no further surveying or permitting is required at this time. 4.3 FEDERAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS Section 404 Dredge and Fill Permitting Due to a direct connection to offsite cypress swamps and roadside ditches, it is our preliminary opinion that the wetlands occurring onsite will be claimed as jurisdictional by USACE. As the wetlands are under USACE jurisdiction, a permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act will be required. If all wetlands onsite are proposed to be impacted then a Standard Permit will be required, which typically takes approximately 12 months to process. A Standard Permit will require an alternatives analysis, including avoidance and minimization, in order to demonstrate that the project alternative is the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative. USACE also coordinates with USFWS and other federal agencies, as needed. Federally listed species that could be impacted by the project are discussed below and would be addressed as part of the permitting process. USACE mitigation policy prefers the use of mitigation banks or other regional mitigation areas; therefore, the mitigation plan should be confirmed by USACE before purchasing credits at a mitigation bank. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 18 January 2020 Federally Listed Species Permitting Wood storks Based on the presence of suitable foraging habitat on -site within the wetlands, impacts to wood storks would be addressed as part of the USACE dredge and fill permitting. It is anticipated that mitigation approved for the wetland impacts will be sufficient to offset lost wood stork foraging habitat. Florida panther Due to the project site being within the Focus Area for the Florida panther and it being classified as may affect by the Florida Panther Effect Determination Key, consultation with the USFWS will be required and a Biological Opinion will likely need to be prepared and submitted to the service in conjunction with the Section 404 Permit. Florida bonneted bat The project is located within the consultation area for the Florida bonneted bat and suitable habitat was found on -site. A formal Florida bonneted bat roost survey was conducted and no signs of the Florida bonneted bat were found, therefore, it is not anticipated that the project site is being utilized by the Florida bonneted bat. Consultation with USFWS is recommended prior to site development to ensure no further surveying for the bat would be required. Eastern indigo snake No additional surveys or permitting will be required for the eastern indigo snake, however the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake will need to be incorporated during construction. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 19 January 2020 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS • Based on the Florida Master Site File, two sites (eligible for the NRHP) were identified on or within the immediate vicinity of the project site. Further coordination with SHPO is anticipated. • Implementation of the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake during construction is recommended per the USFWS key. These measures consist of signage and construction crew educational materials to identify and avoid impacts to the species. • A formal Florida bonneted bat roost survey was conducted and it is not anticipated that the project site is being utilized by the Florida bonneted bat. Consultation with USFWS is recommended prior to site development to ensure no further surveying for the bat would be required. • Coordination with the USFWS will be required regarding the onsite panther habitat. A biological opinion may be required to submit to the service in conjunction with the 404 dredge and fill permit. • An ERP will be required to develop this site and mitigation will be required to offset the wetland loss. Mitigation can include on -site or off -site mitigation or purchase of mitigation bank credits. Forested credits are available from Panther Island Mitigation Bank Expansion for $95,000/credit. • It appears some wetlands on -site are connected to off -site wetlands, therefore a USACE JD is recommended to determine USACE jurisdiction. Wetlands that are jurisdictional will require a Section 404 dredge and fill permit. The wetland mitigation plan will need to be included in the Section 404 permit application. • Mitigation will be required to off -set lost wood stork foraging habitat. However, mitigation provided for wetland impacts will likely be sufficient to mitigate lost wood stork foraging habitat. Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL 20 January 2020 APPENDIX A FNAI DATA REPORT (UNOFFICIAL) Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL January 2020 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Pagel of 3 NOTE 1018 Thomasville Road nlle 2OaC Tallahassee, FL 32303 Florida Natural Areas Inventory T 850-224-8207%p Biodiversity Matrix Query Results 850-681-9364` p fax www.fnai.org UNOFFICIAL REPORT Created 7/2/2018 M1. Ar1- (Contact the FNAI Data Services Coordinator at 850.224.8207%P or VENTORY kbrinegar@fnai.fsu.edu for information on an official Standard Data Report) The Biodiversity Matrix includes only rare species and natural communities tracked by FNAI. Report for 1 Matrix Unit: 58294 UIZ It 1 Matrix Unit ID: 58294 1 Documented Element Found Descriptions DOCUMENTED - There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix Unit. DOCUMENTED -HISTORIC - There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix Unit; however the occurrence has not been observed/reported within the last twenty years. LIKELY - The species or community is known to occur in this vicinity, and is considered likely 1. documented occurrence overlaps this and adjacent Matrix Units, but the documentation isn't precise enough to indicate which of those Units the species or community is actually located in; or 2. there is a documented occurrence in the vicinity and there is suitable habitat for that species or community within this Matrix Unit. POTENTIAL - This Matrix Unit lies within the known or predicted range of the species or community based on expert knowledge and environmental variables such as climate, soils, topography, and landcover. Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Puma concolor coryi G5T1 S1 LE FE Florida Panther 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrixIGridSearch.cf n?sel_id=58294&extent=71... 7/2/2018 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Page 2 of 3 4 Likely Elements Found Global State Federal State Scientific and Common Names Rank Rank Status Listing Mvcteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Rockland hammock G2 S2 N N Rostrhamus sociabilis G4G5 S2 LE N Snail Kite Ursus americanus floridanus Florida Black Bear G5T2 S2 N N Matrix Unit ID: 58294 15 Potential Elements for Matrix Unit 58294 Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis G4T1 S1 LE FE Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow Arovthamnia blodaettii G2 S2 C E Blodgett's Wild -mercury Colubrina cubensis var. floridana G2G3T1 S1 N E Cuban Snake -bark Digitaria pauciflora G1 S1 C E Few -flowered Fingergrass Drvmarchon coupe G3 S3 LT FT Eastern Indigo Snake Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia G4T2 S2 N N Narrow -leaved Carolina Scalystem Encvclia cochleata var, triandra G4G5T2 S2 N E Clamshell Orchid Forestiera segregata var, pinetorum G4T2 S2 N N Florida Pinewood Privet Galactia pinetorum G2Q S2 N N Pineland Milkpea Jacouemontia curtissii G2 S2 N T Pineland Jacquemontia Linum carteri var. smallii G2T2 S2 N E Small's Flax Microgramma heterophylla G4G5 S2 N E Climbing Vine Fern Picoides borealis G3 S2 LE FE Red -cockaded Woodpecker Roystonea elata G2G3 S2 N E Florida Royal Palm Trichomanes punctatum ssp. floridanum G4G5T1 S1 E E Florida Filmy Fern Disclaimer The data maintained by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory represent the single most comprehensive source of information available on the locations of rare species and other significant ecological resources statewide. However, the data are not always based on comprehensive or site -specific field surveys. Therefore, this information should not be regarded as a final statement on the biological resources of the site being considered, nor should it be substituted for on -site surveys. FNAI shall not be held liable for the accuracy and completeness of these data, or opinions or conclusions drawn from these data. FNAI is not inviting reliance on these data. Inventory data are designed for the purposes of conservation planning and scientific research and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrixIGridSearch.cf n?sel_id=58294&extent=71... 7/2/2018 FNAi Biodiversity Matrix Page 3 of 3 Unofficial Report These results are considered unofficial. FNAI offers a Standard Data Request option for those needing certifiable data. http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrixIGridSearch.cf n?sel_id=58294&extent=71... 7/2/2018 APPENDIX B USFWS IPAC TRUST RESOURCES REPORT Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL January 2020 IPaC: Explore Location Page 1 of 13 IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service WaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site - specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Collier County, Florida Local office South Florida Ecological Services Field Office �. (772) 562-3909t. I� (772) 562-4288t. 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 http://fws.gov/verobeach https://ecos.fW s.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHHML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Page 2 of 13 Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following: 1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. 2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. 3. Log in (if directed to do so). 4. Provide a name and description for your project. S. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries'). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: https://ecos. fws. gov/ipac/location/O S GZ 5RJISFCHHML 5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 INC: Explore Location Page 3 of 13 Mammals NAME Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8630 Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1 763 Puma (=mountain Lion) Puma (-Felis) concolor (all subsp. except coryi) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049 West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus There is final critical habitat for this species_ Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 STATUS Endangered Endangered SAT Threatened i n e�, Birds NAME STATUS -0 o oruQlausaudubonii Threatened Audubon's Crested Caracara �No critical habitat has been de ed fpecies. htt s://ecos.fws. ov/ec /s e 25 Cape Sable Seaside arrow Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species- Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6584 Everglade Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabTs plumbeus Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/sl2ecies/7713 Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum Endangered floridanus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/32 Florida Scrub -jay Aphelocoma coerulescens Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6174 https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Page 4 of 13 Ivory -billed Woodpecker Campephilus principalis Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8230 Kirtland's Warbler Setophaga kirtlandii (= Dendroica kirtlandii) Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. htt ps://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/8078 Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/6039 Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened 114 No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/1864 0 x Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Wood Stork Mycteria americans Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this speceS. o!�; https://ecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/8477 #' Reptiles NAME 1 0STATUS American Alligator A Bator mississippiensis SAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 AI American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus Threatened There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6604 Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646 Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.aov/ecp/species/1110 https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 INC: Explore Location Page 5 of 13 Fishes NAME STATUS Atlantic Sturgeon (gulf Subspecies) Acipenser oxyrinchus Threatened (=oxyrhynchus) desotoi There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/651 Insects NAME STATUS Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis bartrami Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species- Your location is outside the 114 critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4837 00 x Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyte floridalis Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species- Your location is outside the i critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6652 Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclargus (=Hemiargus) thomasi Endangered bethunebakeri No critical habitat has been designatedthij s. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/speci 7 D\ Flowering Plant NAME d' STATUS Florida P� rae-cfover Dalea carthagenensis floridana Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. �ht ps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2300 Garber's Spurge Chamaesyce garberi Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8229 Critical habitats Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 INC: Explore Location Page 6 of 13 Migratory birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act '- and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act?. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-spec' birds-of-conservation-concern.php Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds htt ://www.fws. ov/birds/mana ement/ rolect-assessment-tools-and- i e/ conservation-measures.php % A - Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ belr'. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below_ For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA BREEDING ....................................................................... I....................... SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ...................................................................I........................ ON YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY ................................................................................. BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA .................................................................................... SOMETIME WITHIN THE ................................................................ TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A ............................................................................................... VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE ...................................................................................... DATES INSIDE WHICH THE BIRD ..................................................................................... BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE ........................................................................... RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE" https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Page 7 of 13 Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Probability of Presence Summary INDICATES THATTHE BIRD DOES ......................................................................................... NOT LIKELY BREED IN YOUR ............................................................................ PROJECT AREA.) .......................................... Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence' ) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (1) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. https://ecos. fws. gov/ipac/location/O S GZ 5RJISFCHHML 5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Page 8 of 13 No Data (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. ■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR Prairie Warbler ---- ---- --- -- BCC Rangewide (CON) ............................................. is is a Bird of ................................. Conservation Concern .............................................. BCC h h MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC till 116 Mon ---- -- ( ) t roug out its .......................................... range in the ........................ continental USA and Alaska.) ................ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to igrr ory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impafts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To'se� when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. N What does IPaC use to generate the migrator . s potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in yo#r project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle 'Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E-bird Explore Data Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 INC: Explore Location Page 9 of 13 How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year- round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list eithe the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshor a ee fro c tain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). 6- Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC specie oforangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid an imize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlanti Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal -The Portal also offers data and information about othexa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird mtc_jel results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data an alsprovide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Modelslying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird S tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. Wha'f if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Page 10 of 13 means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. �o� Foy O� CO,O� 1100, https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Page 11 of 13 Marine mammals Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected under the Endangered Species Act and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora?. The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries a [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website. The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or attempt to ..................................................................................................................................................... harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine mammals and further coordination may be necessary for ....................................................................................... project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office shown. 1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. 2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not threaten their survival in the wild. 3. NOAA Fisheries_ also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are potentially affected by activities in this location: NAME West Indian Manat� Trichechus manatus htt s://ecosAws. ov c /s edes/4469 Facilities National Wildlife Refuge lands Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION. https://ecos. fws. gov/ipac/location/O S GZ 5RJISFCHHML 5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 INC: Explore Location Page 12 of 13 Fish hatcheries THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION. Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. This location overlaps the following wetlands: FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND PF02/EM5C PSS2/1 C A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, tailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland bouncries or class9fication established through image analysis. T curacy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the u7munt and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. Data precautions https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Page 13 of 13 Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. �o� FOB CO,O� 1100, https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/OSGZ5RJISFCHFIML5ZKMI7TXZNI/resources 7/2/2018 APPENDIX C STANDARD PROTECTION MEASURES FOR THE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL January 2020 STANDARD PROTECTION MEASURES FOR THE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service August 12, 2013 The eastern indigo snake protection/education plan (Plan) below has been developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in Florida for use by applicants and their construction personnel. At least 30 days prior to any clearing/land alteration activities, the applicant shall notify the appropriate USFWS Field Office via e-mail that the Plan will be implemented as described below (North Florida Field Office: jaxregs(&fws.JZov; South Florida Field Office: verobeach(&fws.gov; Panama City Field Office: panamacity(&fws.gov). As long as the signatory of the e-mail certifies compliance with the below Plan (including use of the attached poster and brochure), no further written confirmation or "approval" from the USFWS is needed and the applicant may move forward with the project. If the applicant decides to use an eastern indigo snake protection/education plan other than the approved Plan below, written confirmation or "approval" from the USFWS that the plan is adequate must be obtained. At least 30 days prior to any clearing/land alteration activities, the applicant shall submit their unique plan for review and approval. The USFWS will respond via e- mail, typically within 30 days of receiving the plan, either concurring that the plan is adequate or requesting additional information. A concurrence e-mail from the appropriate USFWS Field Office will fulfill approval requirements. The Plan materials should consist of. 1) a combination of posters and pamphlets (see Poster Information section below); and 2) verbal educational instructions to construction personnel by supervisory or management personnel before any clearing/land alteration activities are initiated (see Pre -Construction Activities and During Construction Activities sections below). POSTER INFORMATION Posters with the following information shall be placed at strategic locations on the construction site and along any proposed access roads (a final poster for Plan compliance, to be printed on I I" x 17" or larger paper and laminated, is attached): DESCRIPTION: The eastern indigo snake is one of the largest non -venomous snakes in North America, with individuals often reaching up to 8 feet in length. They derive their name from the glossy, blue -black color of their scales above and uniformly slate blue below. Frequently, they have orange to coral reddish coloration in the throat area, yet some specimens have been reported to only have cream coloration on the throat. These snakes are not typically aggressive and will attempt to crawl away when disturbed. Though indigo snakes rarely bite, they should NOT be handled. SIMILAR SNAKES: The black racer is the only other solid black snake resembling the eastern indigo snake. However, black racers have a white or cream chin, thinner bodies, and WILL BITE if handled. LIFE HISTORY: The eastern indigo snake occurs in a wide variety of terrestrial habitat types throughout Florida. Although they have a preference for uplands, they also utilize some wetlands and agricultural areas. Eastern indigo snakes will often seek shelter inside gopher tortoise burrows and other below- and above -ground refugia, such as other animal burrows, stumps, roots, and debris piles. Females may lay from 4 - 12 white eggs as early as April through June, with young hatching in late July through October. PROTECTION UNDER FEDERAL AND STATE LAW: The eastern indigo snake is classified as a Threatened species by both the USFWS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. "Taking" of eastern indigo snakes is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act without a permit. "Take" is defined by the USFWS as an attempt to kill, harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect, or engage in any such conduct. Penalties include a maximum fine of $25,000 for civil violations and up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment for criminal offenses, if convicted. Only individuals currently authorized through an issued Incidental Take Statement in association with a USFWS Biological Opinion, or by a Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the USFWS, to handle an eastern indigo snake are allowed to do so. IF YOU SEE A LIVE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and allow the live eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site without interference; • Personnel must NOT attempt to touch or handle snake due to protected status. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Immediately notify supervisor or the applicant's designated agent, and the appropriate USFWS office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • If the snake is located in a vicinity where continuation of the clearing or construction activities will cause harm to the snake, the activities must halt until such time that a representative of the USFWS returns the call (within one day) with further guidance as to when activities may resume. IF YOU SEE A DEAD EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and immediately notify supervisor or the applicant's designated agent, and the appropriate USFWS office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Thoroughly soak the dead snake in water and then freeze the specimen. The appropriate wildlife agency will retrieve the dead snake. Telephone numbers of USFWS Florida Field Offices to be contacted if a live or dead eastern indigo snake is encountered: North Florida Field Office — (904) 731-3336 Panama City Field Office — (850) 769-0552 South Florida Field Office — (772) 562-3909 2 PRE -CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 1. The applicant or designated agent will post educational posters in the construction office and throughout the construction site, including any access roads. The posters must be clearly visible to all construction staff. A sample poster is attached. 2. Prior to the onset of construction activities, the applicant/designated agent will conduct a meeting with all construction staff (annually for multi -year projects) to discuss identification of the snake, its protected status, what to do if a snake is observed within the project area, and applicable penalties that may be imposed if state and/or federal regulations are violated. An educational brochure including color photographs of the snake will be given to each staff member in attendance and additional copies will be provided to the construction superintendent to make available in the onsite construction office (a final brochure for Plan compliance, to be printed double -sided on 8.5" x I I" paper and then properly folded, is attached). Photos of eastern indigo snakes may be accessed on USFWS and/or FWC websites. 3. Construction staff will be informed that in the event that an eastern indigo snake (live or dead) is observed on the project site during construction activities, all such activities are to cease until the established procedures are implemented according to the Plan, which includes notification of the appropriate USFWS Field Office. The contact information for the USFWS is provided on the referenced posters and brochures. DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 1. During initial site clearing activities, an onsite observer may be utilized to determine whether habitat conditions suggest a reasonable probability of an eastern indigo snake sighting (example: discovery of snake sheds, tracks, lots of refugia and cavities present in the area of clearing activities, and presence of gopher tortoises and burrows). 2. If an eastern indigo snake is discovered during gopher tortoise relocation activities (i.e. burrow excavation), the USFWS shall be contacted within one business day to obtain further guidance which may result in further project consultation. 3. Periodically during construction activities, the applicant's designated agent should visit the project area to observe the condition of the posters and Plan materials, and replace them as needed. Construction personnel should be reminded of the instructions (above) as to what is expected if any eastern indigo snakes are seen. POST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Whether or not eastern indigo snakes are observed during construction activities, a monitoring report should be submitted to the appropriate USFWS Field Office within 60 days of project completion. The report can be sent electronically to the appropriate USFWS e-mail address listed on page one of this Plan. APPENDIX D SHPO FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE REPORT Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL January 2020 This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. July 2, 2018 --Florida Master Shelby Moran Site File Kimley-Horn 445 24th St, Suite 200 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone: 772.794.4037 Email: Shelby.Moran@kimley-hom.com In response to your inquiry of July 2, 2018 the Florida Master Site File lists two archaeological sites, two resource groups, and one historic structure at the designated area of Collier County, Florida: 25°48'51.87"N, 80152'57.79"W with a quarter mile APE as shown on the corresponding map. When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Cody VanderPloeg Archaeological Data Analyst Florida Master Site File Cody.VanderPloeg@dos.myflorida.com 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph 1 850.245.6439 fax SiteFile@dos. state.fl.us Cultural Resource Search Quarter Mile APE Collier County 0 0.035 0.07 0.14 0.21 0.28 Miles July 2018 Florida Master Site File -Florida AR=2 Master 55 ==000 CN Site rMIS RG=2 File otal=4 Tota SitelD Type Site Name CR00161 AR SEMINOLE CAMP CR00292 AR NN (BICY 115) CR00927 RG US-41 CR00928 RG Tamiami Canal Cultural Resource Roster Address Page 1 of 1 Additional Info Human Remains May Be Present Linear Resource - 1 Contrib Resources Linear Resource - 1 Contrib Resources Created: 7/2/2018 SHPO Eval NR Status Eligible Eligible APPENDIX E UMAM DATA FORMS Natural Resource Assessment Collier County, FL January 2020 PART I — Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.) •<»aa4 -j> /m t$ » -P/C�<`t a$ »fi > > »> > $ »t< fD>L -fi a$ »fi t$ •L$ • -" »ftfi » t< » t<»fi > %°..» Ok, »fi %¢ > > �'p/qg<`t #- <`tG' # 4964 r„ 4<-t - •c»A > > »> > $ » t< fb>6 . f» t> fiaq tofk , »... t$ »ae «$ »fi »°/dn>... tofi -..§ f -t> , » f•» --<, Al9yg ae <» ..»f� ..»> •„ ti<-t -' $-fkLt-" »-„ fI, , p/0A) L(-t), • <- Lt.., %8//.tt»%t ' K, »<•Lt..>. -(, >A) «f'L%u ' LoA « Lt..). -fD)) <»...' »<'4t...9 °oott» °dd>...<- •Lfi, »fi' »<'Gt..2 _,•,> •<» <- <, » t-fK, Gt...' »> < »<'Gt..2 Lfb L-)- °oott» °dd>...<- t fHL..2 •..» ..x o G`t„ , S «(fi »...« •Lt..). f 5)" -(o •§ ..»" > •- )>... Lfb L•> - L.. ,%Ut< <- <, » ' »<•Lt..z > > »> > $ »t( LS) L %ot> •> o -" <' - <§ »> _,, _fu» <»...' >wLt ' Lt Lt.. -t tt , t ' — § Lt t `t° t'$ -> < »p%so -P' »•§ L•.. .0% fb» > f 4 -..x<$ <p/oo«$ ' , ••» <, » $ •ra»...' >w6t.., Lfi.'. —..z %ot> -) o _„ fV f'"Gt » » fif- %O-t«> <»fo fi<, 4-••«> Lfk-16 , —, f" L..p o/VFf t•LtG %o%o •«$ f , f§>- Lt<o JOX60/o > L' L•t »«- f"" » of-L 5) » t> Lt...' Lm t §fk•» f -5).-L %ufV'>>fiL tfil<»t»>> f%t> ...Art" <, » 5)-L<-�'» flfK§'t fD>•L<-t <- <, » fD>„ `tL. o. i->°/do •> •<, •t <, » »f, •L..»> G<`tG' Zf -o)' >wLt..z ' , 'P/qo 6N 5> •L<'' > •§ 't<L%do 0 0 t<!,o /do /� fD» > > ' L$ > LfC> » /oo$ 't„ «t'fl «» «to/cb­t> r„ i<`t "-fi N" -(o )>% •<2s<, »fi , •> <-ftP/wo » -t » fr$ Lf§ f-. X /6&-t t«<fr»t< <fiLt> -fK Lt.. q(§%et„ "-fit„ 't„ > L' t't„ Gt... t«fk »f§ , t xL< "-fi> -$ » "-), Gt...-t" »fi» fiL<»> t<p/an t<» ... •..:1'» , <• ft<-t t> D.. -t K»fit«<fW , »"'»' f '> <_„> »(Yaa) t<'O/en t<».., <• ft<-t § <»... »MaD» f •> <> »%e» <, »fi », L' <, L< Lfb fb fD» > t<Lof, » _„ <, » t> > »> > # »t< LfbL Lt.. TD>L> -t1, '§ »:1 »°ldd>... <- (Yot) > -'A/g3<`t f <§ » -' «> » Gt...'t<»t> R§ -' «> » tMp L<»...' •..:»'t%c..»> ' t..'t„ fi.z <-fi -<, »fi •fi.. —.. <-fi # Lfr..t tt<, »fi# > »%D» -fr..L tt(, )A > # 6.. # t# # t'> > »ff, »... " •..»t°/C4 -" • ..:» > <"f t<•-t f • < > »%e» . AVICIO§ - > »ff' »... -fi-(, A) •„ t> > «%o t> diit%o> ..fr 't„ > °/gq>'t„ > t»> o »<%o • ..»'» - > A, »...'t°/mi<..» mfi »§ " (<-(d > $ »fi9/ggt °/<fd-' fb... > , -« •..»fw.., •« »fi„ %) > , - »fi tt... t »fP/ggt t"', t<-fi >>w)t>>t<%t..«O/cn>... § >>»>>$»t<..t<»f> -5 t%o» •»fi Lt... flat - «ZfD> f Obe ae L PART II — Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.) •c»394-1�0160 L$ » ..9/qq<-t «$ A > > »> > $ » t( fn) 6 6$ » -fi «$ ))fi # L(-t > > ))> > $ »t( %ot..«°/*)... § > > »> > # i% -fr 60/w> »fi Lt... fl&t - «jb> f CF59 a- C » > %Apt„ -" 't..%.( fr•) L>»..-t' , L< '-((•... » ) a•cL •» "-fr<, » �,<»fr L> > »> > »... Optimal (10) Moderate 7 Minimal (4) Not Present (0) -t. X-t '> - ('$ l,' Lt... -t..'x-t •> •»> > <, Lt ""'P/dWt< — <$ L' «< > «�",p/dD)t< <— 't$ L' '»" », —„ > « -fK —„ ' —t..•K-t 9 "t> « <— ' # L't<G't $ -> < »<•Gt..ae«fl'e%u ZO fl V •..» » cGt..ae«fi'6%v ° "«t /ov-t> °/drt> ° 1C94-0/06—t 4t... L ' A 0% 89 5>) -fi «L'a§ , a •cL< > « fK -«<> •..» »<•at...•> $ »... °/drO> <, » t fK, ct... »L> < fb» •..»t<•L• ..» »- $ »t< » •, <> —' »°A<—<, »t-fK,»><»rl-)o 't<L(YcrO'1c§ fn))> >' Z$ fD»> >' L$ •> L LfK—„< » "»fl,•L..»> L<`tG• «t-'"' "fi­-$ <, » « .4t..a %,((•...t»„ L<'` »'§ $ L%(, » °/1§ S > ' , '%° n . AV'/dd§ L..t%nt( (- (, » ..»" » L $ »t( ....:F>> %tt L,O/") ) <, » ' )w t..." <, » 0% 5>) > >' L$ <, L(• > «fifi­-<(t..rt„ <, » ' )wLt... ° #CS L(»fi t" G-tt »t( # t "'-fi « 'Lt..>• L<»fi ..» <, �> L fi­- frLa)"-fi o% fD» > „ fF' <, L <, -(<„ , L<»fi fl «L • § ' �> -' ..fn>°/u§ �..1�godt< <- <, » ..»" » _ $ »t< %) , L> t-(».. .' K, +t (, )) ' »('4t... Lt.., «# 4t ..o (A Gt%N V —L( ) o%art„ L) t—(».. Y, •t <, » »<•Lt... , Ao ' L> t-' zmfi 5)) »t<' •c, •t <, » $ •n»...' »<'Lt• •, Lfi �• —. § L ` L t" t# t $ fH" »> L> §-« (%" »• "((fi,»fi'V$ ..»" »- $ »t(' 'K, 't <, » ' »(•Lt... ae 5)) -fi %sffwt( '<, CE „ » <L' <-t Gt aefi fk frL<» > »°/dW> ' »fi>> "-«t...' 'K, •t <, » 0% fn» > >' L$ # S)) > -$ » ))—('P/doo ' »fu) 5))> »t<' 'K, •t <, » »t<, A/o° -$ $ «t'<§ # •T>»...' »< Gt.., Lfi..'. —.. } fl6 f•..Lt » 4 4t... -$ » t«•> 4t°/W > »°/de» ' »fn> fn» »t( # �,fi­-••tL ' ..L' -' »" )>fi <, >>5> ' >>fix> >—$ » tG(.'» > )AW) G> ' A•• t' Ott $ §fK•» Lfo) > G L•$ »<(— ae 5)) -fi C %ofc> a > 4 -" -" » > %Aw a: #:, fn» »fl' L<-t 6> $ '<•„ 4<-t -fi $ G°/do 4> > »> > $ »t( Lfu)L> g6ffb>t< emu» »fl' L(-t L..S> <$ »t< "�°/do-fi a fi' ae fn» Y, a ..»'<L ❑ L%fig» a '<•„ L<� » 'L„ k "Lq�fi a °Ladd-fi a -f CE t >) >> ')> ..>I(» -fit ' •„ L<�t L> > »> > t »t< 65> (�> a ..» •(Ld3 "6%,_fi u fn a WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: [ t Y.$ • — »fitt »t< »t<»fi City/County:—••v>fi —(<t(§ Sampling Date: CEO al; L Applicant/Owner: 4 1— )) fr » FL State: Sampling Point: •fit ... Investigator(s): —fr �,%go» %fi %t - <q,5) f Section, Township, Range: CE ° •• —«<, , �> < Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): None Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR U Let: ° LIS L Long: L ° is L Datum: NAVD 1988 Soil Map Unit Name: • t t—' t NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No = (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No 0 Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No = Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes= No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes T=F No = —••> 4 » 4D>...<— » -• $ fit... » )AD) ate •» <— . !, »— 1. Hp-* G<»• o»> •c» �,> ..» »— »...•t <, » L > Y, �,D>••„ —<o t<» I HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum is required; check that Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks =Surface Water (Al) of one all apply) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (136) =Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) =High Water Table (A2) 0 Aquatic Fauna (B13) =Drainage Patterns (B10) =Saturation (A3) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) =Moss Trim Lines (B16) 0 Water Marks (B1) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2) 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Crayfish Burrows (C8) 0 Drift Deposits (B3) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 0 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) =Geomorphic Position (D2) = Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Thin Muck Surface (C7) =Shallow Aquitard (D3) Olnundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) = Other (Explain in Remarks) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Saturation Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches): Yes= No= Depth Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No= (inches): includes capillaryfrin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: , 'fit... Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6. 7. Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. _ 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1..'/a°>% f� 2. `t-Q, , fk(t > "/det-4,`t 3. -t> 04 t-(, `t 4.-ttp/G%t fn) )>t> ° 5. , §t%o-> -k Olm fk<,� ° 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 0 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. (A) (B) (A/B) = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: = Total Cover ❑ Dominance Testis >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, = Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH) _ Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes El No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version SOIL to the depth needed to document the indicator or Sampling Point: , 'Gt Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-6 Be 100 sandy —%°> $ e: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix ric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑. 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑. 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 15313) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No❑ • » „ » f�. > -•. •o ' »fn> ..u„ , -' »" »fi' » U ( G im-° $ G<»' °Oo»> -•• L »Lc>...<- » D>" •-<o • ..h « < i ».. ! -> > • -• $ L<»fr�. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Tamiami Government Center City/County: Collier County Sampling Date: 6/21/2018 Applicant/Owner: Seminole Tribe State: FL Sampling Point: WL 1 Investigator(s): Tori Bacheler, Frank Suarez Section, Township, Range: S36, T53 South, R 34 East Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope ( V None Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR U Lat: 25 48'51.95"N Long: -80 52'59.40"W Datum: NAVD 1988 Soil Map Unit Name: Unknown NWI classification: PF02/EM5C Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No = (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes [� No= Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �� No = Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes v �_ No = �/ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No = HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) =Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Q✓ Surface Water (Al) Q✓ Water -Stained Leaves (69) Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) =High Water Table (A2) = Aquatic Fauna (6 �=�Sparsely v13) I iDrainage Patterns (B10) =Saturation (A3) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) =Moss Trim Lines (616) = Water Marks (131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2) =Sediment Deposits (132) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Crayfish Burrows (C8) =Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) =Algal Mat or Crust (64) = Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) =Geomorphic Position (D2) =Iron Deposits (135) = Thin Muck Surface (C7) =ShallowAquitard (D3) =Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No = Depth (inches): 12 Inches �_✓ v Water Table Present? Yes I 1 No Depth (inches): 6 inches Saturation Present? Yes1-7"I No= Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No= includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Area has been experiencing higher than average rainfall. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WL 1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Taxodium distichum 55 Y OBL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Schinus terebinthifolius 5 N FACW Salix caroliniana 5 N FACU Total Number of Dominant 1 3• Species Across All Strata: (B) 4 Ficus aurea 5 N FAC Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 70 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = 1 Taxodium distichum 5 FACW species x 2 = 2• FAC species x 3 = 3• FACU species x 4 = 4• UPL species x 5 = 5. Column Totals: (A) (B) 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 = Total Cover Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑✓ Dominance Test is >50% 1 Morella cerifera 5 N FAC ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2 Serenoa repens 5 N FACU ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3 Chrysoblanus icaco 5 N FACW 4 Typha spp. 5 N OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 5. 6. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 7. Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 20 = Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Toxicodendron radicans <1 N FAC 2 Panicum repens 5 N FACW Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less g than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 4• Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6• Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7. herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody $ plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. 10. Woody vine —AII woody vines, regardless of height. 11. 12. 6 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 Hydrophytic Vegetation El = Total Cover Present? Yes NoEl Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version SOIL to the depth needed to or Sampling Point: WL 1 Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 mucky some sand mixed in 3-18 10YR 3/1 100 mucky ric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) ❑_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013) Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes No= US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version t INESSESSEEZZZZ::= Feet A%'* ' a ' r :r t t Preserve tir`�. •S r•� ,Iry 11xk - =t 4. OR UJ �k �.� I r � F �• U m U S �' `• ! 0 ti 0 Legend C Wetland Delineation Flags" Proposed Wetland Restoration (±0.10 acres) QPreserve Limits (±0.41 acres) - includes restored wetlands 'Preliminary wetland delineation conducted by Kimley-Horn in August 2018. Wetland �! W 0 Permanent Wetland Impacts (±0.29 acres) lines are subject to review and approval by ,Pro osed Demolition Limits SFWMD, USACE and Collier County. `1 L---� p Source: Aerial courtesy of ESRI Native Vegetation Preserved Ma Ki m I ey >>> H o r n Seminole Tribe of Florida Tamiami Government Center © 2022 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 57257 US-41 445 24th Street, Suite 200, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Ochopee, FL Phone (772) 794-4100 www.kimley-hom.com 1 inch = 57 feet PROJECT NUMBER: 043239003 1 FEBRUARY 2022 FIGURE 3 Preserve Area Management Plan 1.0 Introduction Kmley-Horn & Associates, Inc. scientists performed a site visit on August 2019 in order to evaluate the preserve area proposed as part of the Seminole Government Center project. The project site is located north of Tamiami Trail in Collier County, Rorida (Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East). A portion of the project site has been previously developed into a religious center. The proposed preserve encompasses approximately 0.41 acreswithin the northeastern portion of the subject property. The purpose of the site visit wasto assessthe current condition of the preserve in order to develop the Preserve Management Plan. 2.0 Existing Conditions The preserve area contains a cypress swamp community (FLUCFCS621 — Cypress Swamp) with significant coverage of a forested canopy with little to no shrubs or ground covers. The canopy contained exclusively pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens). There are no exoticswithin the cypress swamp. Another portion of the proposed preserve currently contains disturbed land (FLUCFCS740). Thisarea contains no vegetation, however it will be planted (asdescribed below) and will be included within the preserve limits. 3.0 Supplemental Planting Plan As part of the Preserve Management Plan, existing native vegetation within the proposed preserve limitswill be retained and protected. There are no existing exotic species therefore there is no proposed treatment for existing exotics. However, herbicide treatment of invasive-exoticspedes will take place if these species appear within the preserve. Supplemental plantingswill take place within the disturbed land after this area isgraded to the same elevation asthe adjacent cypressswamp. The plantingswill consist of pond cypress, which has been selected in order to mimicthe existing natural plant community onsite. Oypresswill be a minimum of 10 feet tall. In addition, although existing shrub and herbaceous groundcover is minimal throughout the cypress swamp, to prevent recruitment of exotics within the disturbed land, shrub and herbaceous groundcoverswill be planted within this area. Shrubs will include pond apple (Annona glabra) and buttonbush (Cephalantusoccidentalis). Both of these shrubs will be a minimum of 6 feet tall and spacing will be 6 feet on center. Groundcoverswill include blue hyssop (Bacopa caroliniana), sawgrass (Oadium jamaicense), and needle spikerush (Beocharisacicularis). The groundcover spedeswill be planted bareroot. Details regarding each plant species is shown on the below table. All plantswill be obtained from a local native nursery. 4.0 Preserve Management The preserve area will be protected, and its status monitored by the assigned Preserve Manager, which will be the Seminole Tribe of Rorida. Activities precluded from the preserve area include any type of development, the removal of native vegetation, dumping, and mowing. Protective signage will be placed on each side of the preserve to identify and protect it. Thiswill include a total of three signs, less than two square feet reading "Preserve Area — No Mowing or Dumping." See sign details below. Due to the preserve being adjacent to cypress swamp, no fire management activitiesor additional wildlife habitat management strategiesare recommended. The preserve will be monitored on an annual basis, or more frequently if required, to ensure it functions as intended. Following each monitoring event, a report will be prepared to include the percent coverage of native and invasive -exotic species, photographs taken from the permanent field locations, and any recent maintenance activities. The report will also address the following success criteria to be demonstrated five yearsfollowing the installation of the plant material: a) 80%vegetative coverage has been attainted within the preserve. b) Native vegetation is within the range of species diversity, density and distribution documented within reference sites or from literature references for the specific habitat types. c) Native vegetation characteristic of the habitat type are reproducing in the vegetative or seeding manner typical of the species. A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey and Assessment of the Glover Property Project, Collier County, Florida. Project 2013-050 Si?minol Ti'ib of Florida Glo.e. Pope r[y; TH PG P1.je ct e b. 2013 aSpr Glover Property APE ':'��•.: Streets ,.., .. ,.... Report 2013.050.2 A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey and Assessment of the Glover Property Project, Collier County, Florida. Project 2013-050 Authored by Shawn Keyte, Brandy Norton, M.A., R.P.A., and Maureen Mahoney, M.A., R.P.A. October 2019 Tribal Historic Preservation Office Clewiston, FL 33440 Tel: (863) 983-6549 Fax: (863) 902-1117 www.stofthpo.com Please do not distribute, duplicate, reference, or cite without the permission of the THPO. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Several members of the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) contributed to this project. First, the Seminole Tribe of Florida —Tribal Archaeology Section (STOF - TAS) would like to thank the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Paul Backhouse, THPO Director Anne Mullins, and THPO Assistant Director Juan Cancel. Research Assistant Dave Scheidecker conducted a records search of the Seminole Site Files. Architectural Historian Carrie Dilley reviewed the project for possible impacts to standing structures. The project was supervised by Tribal Archaeologist Maureen Mahoney. Fieldwork was performed by Karen Brunso and Maureen Mahoney (Archaeologists). Former Compliance Review Supervisor Bradley Mueller, Current Compliance Review Supervisor David Echeverry, and Compliance Review Specialist Victoria Menchaca offered insight regarding compliance with the STOF Cultural Resource Ordinance (CRO) and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). We also wish to acknowledge the Environmental Resource Management Department (ERMD), for providing essential help and information throughout this project. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The Glover Property project (THPO Project Number 2013-050) involves the construction of a governmental building, which includes utilities, water, sewer, cable, and internet (see Appendix 1 for site plan). According to Harvey Rambarath (STOF Planning and Development Assistant Director), no construction will occur around the canal and no new plants will be added; existing plants will remain in that area. The project is receiving funding from the Seminole Tribe of Florida, though it requires a compliance review pursuant to Section 106 of the NHPA by United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, investigations and a compliance review are also required pursuant to the STOF CRO (C-01-16). The Glover Property area of potential effect (APE) is rectangular in shape and measures at its greatest extent approximately 135 meters (432 feet) north to south by 61 meters (198 feet) east to west. The total area of the APE is 0.72 hectares (1.8 acres). The 2013-050 APE is located on the Tamiami Trail, Collier County, Florida, within Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East. The APE is bound to the north by a vacant lot, to the east by parking lots, to the south by buildings, and to the west by the Tamiami Trail. In order to investigate the Glover Property APE, the TAS completed both background archival research and a cultural resources field survey. The background archival research was undertaken so as to identify potentially significant resources or previously conducted surveys in proximity to the project's APE. This research was used to assist in the determination of an appropriate field investigation methodology. Background research identified six sites and two resource features that are located within 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) of the APE. One resource feature, 08CR00928, Tamiami Canal, overlaps the current APE. The other resource feature, 08CR00927, US-41, is within 30 meters (98 feet) of the current APE. Both resource features are eligible for the Tribal Register of Historic Places (TRHP) and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). A review of the THPO Database also shows that there are six previously completed surveys within 1,000 meters (3,28 feetl) of the APE. None of these surveys overlap the current APE. Field investigations, which included a pedestrian survey and shovel testing, recorded no new sites. However, since 08CR00928 (Tamiami Canal) and 08CR00927 (Tamiami Trail) are within the APE or within 30 meters (98 feet) of the APE, it was necessary to assess these resource features for impacts by the current undertaking. Based on this assessment, the TAS agrees with previous recommendations that both resource features are eligible for the NRHP. Additionally, the TAS recommends that both resource features are eligible for the TRHP. STOF Cultural Resource Ordinance Recommendation Based on the investigations for the Glover Property project, the TAS recommends that re- source feature 08CR00927, Tamiami Trail, and resource feature 08CR00928, Tamiami Ca- nal, are eligible for listing on the TRHP, under criterion i, a property that the Seminole peo- ple consider important to history. Based on the proposed site plan and conversations with Harvey Rambarath (STOF Planning and Development Assistant Director), neither 08CR00927 nor 08CR00928 will be impacted by the undertaking, because no construction is occurring around the canal or road. Therefore, the TAS recommends a finding of cultural resources not adversely affected. National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Recommendation Based on the investigation of the Glover Property project, the TAS recommends, in con- currence with previous findings by the SHPO, Janus Research, Inc., and Archaeological Consulting, Inc., that resource feature 08CR00927, Tamiami Trail, and resource feature, 08CR00928, Tamiami Canal are eligible for listing on the NRHP, under criteria A, Commu- nity, Planning, and Development, and C, Engineering. Based on the proposed site plan and conversations with Harvey Rambarath (STOF Planning and Development Assistant Direc- tor), neither 08CR00927 nor 08CR00928 will be impacted by the undertaking, because no construction is occurring around the canal or road. Therefore, the TAS recommends a find- ing of historic properties not adversely affected per Section 106 of the NHPA. The TAS finds no other issues of concern regarding cultural resources and recommends that the undertaking, as originally proposed in THPO Project Request Number 2013-050 be permitted to proceed. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Section 106 Compliance: Assessing Historic Properties 2 1.2.1 Criteria for Evaluation 2 1.2.2 Criteria Considerations 2 1.2.3 Integrity 3 1.3 Seminole Tribe of Florida Cultural Resource Ordinance Compliance: Assessing Cultural Resources 4 1.3.1 Criteria for Evaluation 4 2.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 2.1 Research Design 5 2.2 Archival Research 5 2.3 Architectural Analysis 9 2.4 Seminole Cultural Site Analysis 9 2.5 Archaeological Field Survey 9 2.5.1 Pedestrian Survey Methods 9 2.5.2 Shovel Test Methods 9 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXT 3.1 Environmental Context 12 3.1.1 Geomorphology and Soil Assessment 12 3.1.2 Fauna and Vegetation 13 3.2 Cultural Context 15 3.2.1 Paleoindian Period (10,000 —7500 BC) 15 3.2.2 Archaic Period (500 BC - AD 1750) 15 3.2.3 Formative Era (1000 BC —AD 1700) 16 3.2.4 Contact Period to the Seminole Wars 19 3.2.5 Seminole War Period (1816-1858 AD) 25 3.2.6 Post War Seminoles in the Everglades and Big Cypress Swamp 26 3.3 The 20th Century in the Big Cypress Swamp and Everglades 28 4.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 4.1 Archival Research Results 33 4.1.1 Probability Zones Assessment 34 li 4.2 Architectural Analysis Results 35 4.3 Archaeological Field Survey Results 35 4.3.1 Pedestrian Survey Results 35 4.3.2 Shovel Test Results 35 4.4.3 Resource Feature Results 39 4.4 Field Photographs 64 4.5 Conclusion and Recommendations 66 4.6 Unanticipated Discoveries 68 SURVEY LOG 69 FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE FORMS 71 APPENDIX 1 75 REFERENCES CITED 76 u FIGURES Figure 1. 2013 Aerial Photograph of the Glover Property APE. 6 Figure 2. Topographic Map of the Glover Property APE. 7 Figure 3. 1980 Aerial Photograph of the Glover Property APE. 8 Figure 4. Probability Zone Locations within the Glover Property APE. 11 Figure 5. USDA-NRCS Soil Survey of the Glover Property APE. 14 Figure 6. Florida Indigenous Settlements in the early 1700s. 24 Figure 7. 1930 Map of Seminole Camp Locations made by Indian Agent Roy Nash. 32 Figure 8. Shovel Test Locations within the Glover Property APE. 37 Figure 9. Location of Resource Groups Overlapping and within 30 Meters of the Glover Property APE. 38 Figure 10. Map of Resource Feature 08CR00927. 44 Figure 11. Map of Resource Feature 08CR00928. 58 TABLES Table 1. Previous Surveys within 1,000 meters (3,280 feet) of the Glover Property APE. 33 Table 2. Previously Recorded Sites and Resource Features within 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) of the Glover Property APE. 34 Table 3. Shovel Test Descriptions for the Glover Property APE. 36 w PHOTOGRAPHS Photograph 1. Captain James F. Jaudon. 45 Photograph 2. Blazing a Trail Through Swamps and Everglades. 45 Photograph 3. Tamiami Trail Blazers holding sign. Photograph 4. Barron G. Collier. 46 M Photograph 5. Seminole Indians on the courthouse steps in Everglades City during opening of the Tamiami Trail. 47 Photograph 6. Town of Everglades celebrates the opening of the Tamiami Trail. 47 Photograph 7. View down the road along canal. Photograph 8. Two cars running on the road by canal. Photograph 9. Along Tamiami Trails in the Florida Everglades. 49 Photograph 10. Seminole on the Tamiami Trail, Florida. 49 Photograph 11. Osceola's Gift Shop and Indian Village along the Tamiami Trail. 50 Photograph 12. Seminole Indian John Osceola and his daughter doing the family wash on the Tamiami Trail, 1956. 50 Photograph 13. Two Seminole women at Chestnut Billy's camp on the Tamiami Trail. 51 Photograph 14. Chestnut Billy's Mikasuki Indian Camp on the Tamiami Trail. 51 Photograph 15. Aerial view of the Tamiami Trail at Miami -Dade County, Florida. 52 Photograph 16. Seminole Indian village along the Tamiami Trail in Florida. 52 Photograph 17. A dredge at work in the Tamiami Canal, Miami Region, Florida. 59 Photograph 18. Palms along the Tamiami Canal. 59 Photograph 19. Barges on the Tamiami Canal, Tamiami Trail, Florida. 60 vii Photograph 20. Seminoles in canal bordering the Tamiami Trail, Everglades. 60 Photograph 21. Seminole woman Nellie Tommie and her son in a wooden canoe. 61 Photograph 22. Seminole Indians in the heart of the Florida Everglades. 61 Photograph 23. Seminole Indian village along Tamiami Trail in Florida. 62 Photograph 24. Indian village on the Tamiami Trail. 62 Photograph 25. Landscape view taken from the Tamiami Trail. 63 Photograph 26. General view of the APE facing north from Shovel Test 1. 64 Photograph 27. General view of the APE facing east from Shovel Test 1. 64 Photograph 28. General view of the APE facing south from Shovel Test 1. 65 Photograph 29. General view of the APE facing west from Shovel Test 1. 65 MR 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Based on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's Cultural Resource Ordinance (C-01-16), Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR Part 800.16 (d), a cultural resources survey must be completed in order to determine if cultural resources or historic properties will be impacted by a proposed undertaking (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). In order to fulfil these requirements, the Tribal Archaeology Section (TAS) conducted a Phase I cultural resource survey and assessment of the Glover Property (THPO Project Number 2013-050) project on June 4, 2013. The Area of Potential Effect (APE) as defined in 36 CFR Part 800.16(d), is "the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist." In defining the APE, the full range of possible impacts, both direct and indirect must be considered. This includes effects that may result from the introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements on a historic resources setting. The proposed Glover Property project consists of the construction of a governmental building, which includes utilities, water, sewer, cable, and internet (see Appendix 1 for site plan). According to Harvey Rambarath (STOF Planning and Development Assistant Director), no construction will occur around the canal and no new plants will be added; existing plants will remain in that area. The initial project request was submitted by Whitney Sapienza (Environmental Resources Management Department) through the Tribal Historic Preservation Office of the Seminole Tribe of Florida (STOF) and was assigned a Project Number of 2013-050 (Figure 1). The APE is rectangular in shape and measures at its greatest extent approximately 135 meters (432 feet) north to south by 61 meters (198 feet) east to west. The total area of the APE is 0.72 hectares (1.8 acres). The 2013-050 APE is located on the Tamiami Trail, Collier County, Florida, within Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East. The APE is bound to the north by a vacant lot, to the east by a parking lot, to the south by buildings, and to the west by the Tamiami Trail. 1 1.2 Section 106 Compliance: Assessing Historic Properties Cultural resources identified during this survey were evaluated to determine their NRHP eligibility. When conducting this evaluation the following factors are considered (from Na- tional Register Bulletin —How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation). 1.2.1 Criteria for Evaluation The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: a. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or b. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in or past; or c. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of con- struction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic val- ues, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or d. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. 1.2.2 Criteria Considerations Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, structures that have been moved from their orig- inal locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in na- ture, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following cat- egories: a. A religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic dis- tinction or historical importance; or b. A building or structure removed from its original location but which is primarily significant for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most im- portantly associated with a historic person or event; or c. A birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no appropriate site or building associated with his or her productive life; or 2 d. A cemetery that derives its primary importance from graves of persons of trans- cendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events; or e. A reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or f. A property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbol- ic value has invested it with its own exceptional significance; or g. A property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance. 1.2.3 Integrity Properties must also retain integrity. Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance To be listed in the National Register of Historic Places, a property must not only be shown to be significant under the National Register criteria, but it also must have integrity. The evaluation of integrity is sometimes a subjective judgment, but it must always be grounded in an understanding of a property's physical features and how they relate to its significance. Historic properties either retain integrity (this is, convey their significance) or they do not. Within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognize seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. Seven Aspects of Integrity • Location • Design • Setting • Materials • Workmanship • Feeling • Association To retain historic integrity a property will always possess several, and usually most, of the aspects. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance. Determining which of these aspects are most important to a particular property requires knowing why, where, and when the property is significant. 3 1.3 Seminole Tribe of Florida Cultural Resource Ordinance Compliance: Assessing Cultural Resources Cultural resources identified during this survey were evaluated to determine their TRHP eligibility. When conducting this evaluation the following factors are considered (from the Tribal Register of Historic Places Guide). 1.3.1 Criteria for Evaluation a. A property that is an important event in Seminole history. b. A property that is important because of a contributing person or group in Semi- nole history. c. A property that is associated with cultural practices or beliefs of the Seminole Tribe of Florida that are (a) rooted in that Community's history; (b) important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community; or (c) holds sig- nificant values and embodies the tribe's cultural identity. d. A property that is associated with human remains (e.g. burial, mortuary complex, cemetery). e. A property that is associated with other significant sites or cultural landscapes in the immediate vicinity. £ A property that is associated with a significant artifact that is unique, diagnostic, ceremonial, or funerary. g. A property that is located in a unique environmental setting for which there is few or no other examples. h. A property with architectural value that is associated with a distinct architectural style, built by a significant tribal member/ architect, displays unique craftsman- ship, age, or significant architectural features. i. A property that the Seminole people consider important to history. 4 2.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 2.1 Research Design The primary goals of the Phase I survey and assessment of the Glover Property project were: • To identify cultural resources within the APE; • To assist the STOF in preserving their cultural heritage by fulfilling the requirements of the STOF CRO; • To, in accordance with Section 106 of the NHPA, identify and evaluate the significance of any district, site, building, structure, or object that maybe be eligible for inclusion in the NRHP, and • To develop recommendations for future management of historic properties based on their significance, as appropriate. The following sections describe methods used to complete the survey and assessment of the Glover Property project, including archival research and field survey. 2.2 Archival Research The TAS conducted archival research for the Glover Property project on May 21, 2013. The research consisted of determining already known site locations, the location of previous surveys, and determining the probability level for identifying additional cultural resources within the APE. In accordance with the standards and guidelines contained in Rule 1A-46, F.A.C., resources utilized for this research included public records on file with the Florida Master Site File (FMSF), the FMSF GIS layer, the STOF - THPO GIS database (Figure 1), the Seminole Site File (SSF), the U.S. Geological Survey (Figure 2), 1980 aerial photography (Figure 3), and the USDA - NRCS soil survey (Figure 4), as well as unpublished cultural resource documents on file at the STOF - THPO. 5 Figure 1. 2013 Aerial Photograph of the Glover Property APE. 1 is � ', ,,` - �" y + • i - � � .�o.' ProJect APE 4-4 vv- Speer NINI .Y "� .'�1� .=�.f n�a ilia ire 14 t 4 Snake Dance Dance is IN 00 y . 0 125 250 500 Meters t a:�. - �••✓':�. .. e•• _. J _, �, . _ . - •+ •ear• s: ,._ .:xsc,iF�%. G l a v e t P t 0 p 0 1 t V I i N P 0 P: 0, 0 C t N u m h e r 1 0 1 3 11 5 0 1 �N�1 NlSir Glover Property APE uaia a...`�•.o... e.. Sawr.wr►1De n, �y„ Lr-.—+ S.U. ��iHitMCM1exrgtgS.Florilia Sites .. R....w i•Itw�rwwps« .. u. w.K f a Mar. G. fwnp 6A Resource Groups Laa.e,ute Svstan: Map DoW. Figure 2. Topographic Map of the Glover Property APE. 7 Figure 3. 1980 Aerial Photograph of the Glover Property APE. 2.3 Architectural Analysis An architectural analysis is conducted of the project's APE for the presence of historic structures/buildings. Archival and documentary investigations focused on those structures fifty years old or older. Historic physical integrity is determined from background research including site observations, analysis of field data, and examination of photographic documentation. This analysis is performed in consultation with an Architectural Historian. 2.4 Seminole Cultural Site Analysis A Tribal Cultural Advisory analysis is conducted of the project's APE for the presence of Seminole Cultural Sites (i.e., clan camps, medicinal plant gathering areas, etc.). This analysis is performed in consultation with Tribal advisers. 2.5 Archaeological Field Survey The archaeological field survey included pedestrian walkover and shovel test excavation across the APE. Prior to fieldwork the TAS conducted background research that highlighted cultural and environmental features of the APE, through which the TAS determined that the APE contained both moderate and low probability zones with respect to the likelihood of containing cultural resources (Figure 4). The moderate probability zone was located in the northern portion of the APE due to the presence of a cypress dome in that area and since oral histories suggest that the edges of these regions were used for cleaning animals after hunting. The low probability zone was situated in the southern portion of the APE due to previous development in that region. 2.5.1 Pedestrian Survey Methods The pedestrian survey conducted by the TAS included examination of the ground surface and of any exposed tree roots, tree falls, etc., when moving between shovel test locations. The pedestrian survey serves the dual purpose of identifying cultural material and also determining if there are elevation changes within the APE. Fluctuations in land elevation are usually associated with Tree Island hammocks which are approximately 20 to 30 centimeters (8 to 12 inches) higher than surrounding landforms. Site locations often correlate with these hammocks. 2.5.2 Shovel Test Methods As part of the moderate probability methodology, the TAS field crew excavated shovel tests at 40 meter (131 foot) intervals within the APE. Shovel tests were not excavated in areas that had standing water. No shovel tests were excavated in the low probability zone since it contained previous development and construction fill. Shovel tests measured 50 centimeters (20 inches) in diameter and were excavated to a depth of 100 centimeters (39 9 inches) below the ground surface (cmbs) unless bedrock, water, or compact marl/calcium carbonate was encountered. All excavated soils were sifted through 6 millimeter (0.25 inch) wire mesh in order to recover any cultural materials that may be present. Shovel test infor- mation was recorded using standard TAS shovel test forms which provide fields for record- ing data including soil type and color (using Munsell Soil Color Chart Notation), soil strata depth relative to the ground surface, soil disturbance types and extent, artifact content, UTM coordinates (using NAD 83), and local environmental type. All hard -copy forms and related information are stored on the Big Cypress Reservation in the THPO building in the associated project folder, and stored electronically in the THPO Database in its correspond- ing electronic project folder (2013-050). 10 - /_�'' '� . � � { �-? tom' ` , , • • r � *-'�.� . Lj �• .. � Q � wj f • r.. �I ;.III r ,r fit* ti ON �... ,V°>'�3t. ..•, -fit';+ r . k � , • � 7 ..►. f _ QTs e. 0 510 20 30 40 �, •[;� .^ ; Meters.. _ �• ••; gym• r Seminole Tribe of Florida G I a rr Pr np tv I,lt PO PN.t nLrr :613 J 01 a - Glover Property APE ��- "� - ttr• �rro � low Probabd&, n..� w+. .m•m w. tpri Maderate P obabddy Streets Figure 4. Probability Zone Locations within the Glover Property APE. 11 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXT 3.1 Environmental Context To understand and evaluate cultural resources, it is necessary to identify the larger context within which they occur. In this chapter, we present details about the local environment to provide a context to use in assessing cultural resources. 3.1.1 Geomorphology and Soil Assessment The landscape within the area of the Tamiami Trail formed due to successive layers being deposited by periods fluctuating between high and low sea levels. Low sea levels were marked by weathering and erosion. These events created the bedrock and cap rock that abounds near the Tamiami Trail. Further successive sea level changes created the marls that would produce the limestone and fill the solution holes and empty places left by the original deposits. Marl normally occurs in wet prairie plant communities, or as lenses in the organic layer. Due to the accumulation of activity that occurred ca. 5,000 BP, it is probable that the peat deposits began at that time. The date of marl deposit is particularly important since cultural material is often found under the marl. Presently, the Tamiami Trail geology can be described as consisting of undifferentiated Pleistocene/Holocene and shelly Pleistocene deposits (Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2001: Florida Geologic Stratigraphy Data, Map Series 146). The landscape of Tamiami Trail crosses through part of the Big Cypress Swamp which constitutes lands directly to the south of Lake Okeechobee. The Trail also crosses through multiple sloughs and marshes which are part of what remains of the Everglades post drainage (McVoy, et al. 2011). Prior to drainage, the Big Cypress Swamp was comprised mostly of inundated areas, though tree island hammocks did abound. These hammocks, or tree islands, generally remained dry due to the fact that they rose 20-40 centimeters (8-16 inches) above the ground surface. The hammocks normally have a "rain -drop shape with a blunt, rounded, up -gradient head and a long, drawn -out, down gradient tail" (Parker 1984: 31). The shape was presumably caused by flooding that frequently occurs in the Big Cypress Swamp. 12 The USDA-NRCS soil survey indicated that there are two soil types present within the APE: Tamiami and Holopaw Sand (Figure 5). The USDA-NRCS defines the Tamiami series as consisting of very poorly drained organic soils that are moderately deep and deep to limestone. The Holopaw series consists of deep and very deep, poorly and very poorly drained soils formed in sandy marine sediments. 3.1.2 Fauna and Vegetation Due to climate changes the landscape in the area of the Tamiami Trail has undergone numerous vegetation changes. For example, the climate of 18,000 BP consisted of a cooler, drier, and windier weather that led to a largely treeless vegetation (Griffin 2002). Over the course of the next 13,000 years, the climate become wetter. This change brought about a diversity of flora, specifically oak (Quercus virginiana ), myrtle (Quercus mrytifolias), hazelnut, birch (Betula populifolia), ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), willow (Sideroxylon sali(ifolium), cypress (Taxodium distichum), cattail (Ty pba latifolia), and elm (Ulmus Americana). By 5,000 BP, the basic modern flora was in place. This flora included some plants with tropical affinities, but for the most part, temperate species dominated and were the most abundant (Griffin 2002). The plant species consist most notably of cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), saw palmetto (Serenoa serrulata), citrus trees (Citrus aurantium), wild coffee (Pycbotria nervosa), green briar, ivy, pasture grass (Iscbnodemus variegatus), soda apple (Solanum viarum), gator flag, and the previously noted species. Normally, tree island hammocks contain palm, palmetto, oak, wild coffee, and citrus. Fauna near the Tamiami Trail included a wide variety of fish, birds, reptiles, and mammals. Griffin (2002:339-348) provides an exhaustive list of the different species. 13 Figure 5. USDA-NRCS Soil Survey Map of the Glover Property APE. 14 3.2 Cultural Context 3.2.1 Paleoindian Period (10,000-7500 BQ The first Prehistoric occupants of Florida consisted of the Paleo-Indian population (10000 BC-7500 BC). The earliest documented evidence for human occupation in South Florida comes from the Little Salt and Warm Mineral Springs sites in Sarasota County (central west Florida) where radiocarbon dates of 10000 and 8000 BC have been obtained. The Gulf Coast region's evidence for the Paleo-Indian occupations presently is limited to a few sites. Excavations at the Harney Flats Site in Hillsborough County have yielded significant data on this little known period. Many Paleo-Indian sites can be found near deep springs, small watering holes, and shallow prairie lakes. Many are today's modern flowing rivers (Milanich 1994). Proximity to water allowed access to was not only to utilize the water source, but also to be near game, including mega fauna, as a food source. An example of such activity can be seen at sites such as Little Salt Springs. After about 7500 BC glaciers melted and sea levels rose. The climate, therefore, became wetter and provided more water sources around which the Paleo -Indian groups could camp. With the appearance of more water sources for Paleo-Indian camps. Later, Paleo-Indian populations were able to transition from nomadic to semi - nomadic (Milanich 1994). Their campsites tended to be located near water sources, as well as by outcrops of chert-bearing limestone. Paleo-Indian sites can generally be identified by the presence of "lanceolate shaped projectile points and a variety of Plano -convex, steeply flaked, unifacial scrapers" (Milanich 1994). Little evidence has been uncovered for Paleo- Indian occupation of the Big Cypress Reservation. This is primarily because the majority of Paleo-Indian sites are located offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. 3.2.2 Archaic Period (7500-500 BC) Cultural development, sedentary living, and environmental changes characterized the Archaic period, which was brought on by the onset of the Holocene. Within the Archaic period there are three separate periods of cultural activity: Early (7500 BCE-5000 BC), Middle (5000 BC-1600 BC), and Late Archaic (1600 BC-500 BC). The climate was much wetter than before, but drier than the modern climate (Milanich 1995). After 5000 BC, the climate began to ameliorate, becoming more like modern conditions. By the Late Archaic period, the environment of Florida was essentially like the modern climate (Milanich 1995). The archaeological record demonstrates that as the population became less nomadic, the size of settlements increased. Decreases in large game animals and the demand of a large population caused a switch to coastal and riverine resources for a stable food supply. Depending upon the number of resources available, the people started splintering into smaller family groups and tribal bands. 15 Larger bands that had spent months collecting specific food resources as a single entity now began to divide into smaller units in order to meet demands of their growing bands. This theory is reinforced by the existence of thousands of "small camp sites" throughout Florida dating from the Archaic Period. Due to the changes in faunal populations, many of the projectile points utilized in the Paleo-Indian period were no longer produced in the Archaic period due to large scale changes in faunal population. This was primarily due to the demise of many mega fauna species at the close of the Pleistocene. The tools during the Archaic period seem to have been produced quickly and show use -wear patterns, which imply the usage of tools for mul- tiple tasks. Many bone tools also date to the Archaic period and have been extensively col- lected from Florida rivers. This again illustrates a change to water resources for both foods and tools. The specialization of tools seems to have been perfected during this time period. Pottery making emerged during the Late Archaic period. The Late Archaic peoples inhabit- ed most of Florida's coasts. Floral and faunal species changed as a result of rising sea levels and a less and climate. Hardwood forests and savannas were replaced eventually by pine forests. Seasonal exploitation of the food resources resulted from this changing environ- ment. The food resources seem to have included small game, nuts, plants, and marine and freshwater resources. Coastal resources were heavily used during the Archaic period along the Gulf of Mexico. 3.2.3 Formative Era (500 BC - AD 1750) The Formative Era in South Florida is divided into three cultural regions: Okeechobee, Ca- loosahatchee, and Glades. However, many scholars argue that these people shared similar cultural practices (Milanich 1994:77). The location of the Glover Property APE lies within the Glades cultural region. The Glades peoples occupied the Everglades throughout Hendry, Palm Beach, Broward, Dade, and Monroe counties; as well as the Big Cypress Swamp located west of the Ever- glades in Collier County; and the saltwater marshes and mangrove forests in Broward and Dade Counties (Milanich 1994). Glades people relied on both marine and terrestrial species for subsistence.; peoples of this period range widely in settlement patterns. The TAS recognizes the Glades culture as being divided into three distinct periods: Glades I (500 BC — AD 750), Glades II (750 BC — AD 1200), and Glades III (AD 1200 — 1750). These periods are distinguished by the various types of ceramics which appeared throughout the archaeological record. The Glades cultural region was associated with ce- ramics that were shaped by the coiling method. Also, bowls with incurving walls and rims were typically associated with these sites. In some cases, modeled pottery was also found in context with Glades period sites. Motifs for Glades decorative ceramics include linear and curvilinear incision and rim ticking. 16 The ceramic type Glades Tooled, which appears late in the pre-Columbian period, exhibits elaborate lip treatments, either pitched, folded or dowel impressed (Milanich; 1994). Other decorated pottery types included incised, punctuated, check stamp, and plain wares that were different from one area to the next in tempering and paste. Chert deposits have not been found within the Glades cultural region. Tools were made from imported chert, sedimentary rocks (such as limestone and sandstone), shell, or faunal bone (Milanich 1994). Tools created from sedimentary rocks and shell include: hones, abraders, hammers, plummets, picks, adzes, celts, gouges, chisels, awls, knives, scrapers, cups, and dippers. Tools made from faunal bone include: pins, awls, fads, points, perforators, as well as cutting and engraving tools. The most commonly used resources for utilitarian tools were deer bone or antler, fish spines, stingray tail spines, and shark teeth (Milanich 1994). The extensive use of faunal remains further exemplifies the versatility of the Glades people of South Florida. Glades peoples constructed earthworks along ponds, canals, rivers, borrows, ditches, and mounds. Although regional differences occurred, archaeologists argue that Glades people utilized waterways and constructed complex social groups around these environments. Within the interior of South Florida, Glades peoples inhabited the small tree islands or hammocks. These islands were inhabited for the flora, fauna, and surrounding wetland resources. Glades 1 Period (500 BC -AD 750) The Glades I period is very well represented in the Big Cypress Swamp (Widmer 1988). The Glades I period can be subdivided into: Glades IA 500 BC —AD 500: No decorated ceramics appear, but the period contains sand -tempered and Glades Plain. Glade IB 500 BC —AD 750: Includes Sanibel Incised, Fort Drum Incised and Punctuated. Ceramic decoration in south Florida was developed by AD 500 (though sand tempered plain ware continued to be used) with the inception of the Fort Drum decorated series. Glades 11 Period (AD 750-1200) This period can accurately be subdivided into three sub periods based on the frequency of decorated ceramic styles. Glades IIA AD 750-900: Includes the appearance of Key Largo Incised, Opa Locka Incised and Miami Incised. 17 Glades IIB AD 900-1100: Key Largo incised is still the majority decorated type of pottery; some incisions on rim and lip grooving; Matecumbe Incised appears as does more incurving bowls (Milanich 1994). Glades IIC AD 1100-1200: Decorated ceramics begin to cease in majority. Some ceramics have grooved lips that appear. Plantation Pitched is seen in small amounts. Glades 111 Period (AD 1200-1750) During the Glades III period, the use of incised decorations returned and trade wares become more prevalent. The emerging prevalence of trade ware reflects a sociopolitical transition. This demonstrates what scholars refer to as a pan -Florida trading network (Widmer 1988). By the end of the Glades III period, European trade goods are also introduced in the region. This time period is associated with many ethnohistorical groups such as the Tequesta, the Key Indians, and the Calusa. Glades IIIA AD 1200-1400: One particular ceramic type of this period is the Surfside Incised, which is similar to Mississippian -like wares present in the north. St. John's checked stamped also appears during this time. Although less common than other pottery types, the appearance of Safety Harbor Incised symbols and motifs can be found within this period. Glades III AD 1300-1500: This period is marked by a decrease in the decorated ceramic types. The majority of the type present is Glades tooled rims. The bodies of these vessels are undecorated with a shallow bowl appearance (Milanich 1994). 18 3.2.4 Contact Period to the Seminole Wars The first contact between the indigenous people of Florida and Europeans occurred in 1513 when Ponce de Leon arrived in Florida near present day Tampa. Documentary evi- dence written by Euro-American scholars suggests that, following this arrival, the popula- tions of Florida were decimated by warfare and pathogens to the point that not a single liv- ing person was left (Wright 1986:5). According to Wickman (1999:1), the "aboriginal inhab- itants of Florida were destroyed over the period of 1513 to 1763, the story concludes and the people known today as Seminoles are an indistinct amalgam of survivors from tribes and territories outside of.....Florida." The people that were later referred to as the Semi- noles were thought of as outsiders, originating elsewhere and coming to Florida in a series of migrations, settling on land and sites that were once occupied by now extinct people (Wright 1986:5). It is problematic for Americans to state that Florida had lost its entire pop- ulation of indigenous groups for two primary reasons. First, this glosses over large amounts of contradictory evidence from oral histories and radiocarbon dates that highlight the an- cestral claim the Seminoles have on Florida. Second, this belief means that the indigenous people who later occupied Florida could have no prior claim on the land, making the area open for settlement by the Europeans and Americans (Wickman 1999:1). Where do the Seminoles come from? In contrast to many American accounts, today's Seminole people are descendants of pre - contact groups from Florida and other southeastern populations. The people the Spanish encountered belonged to a Mississippian tradition that spanned the United States and in- cluded groups such as the Calusa, Jaega, and Tequesta, who lived on Florida's coasts. Alt- hough not encountered by the Spanish, the interior of South Florida was also populated at this time with occupants settled on tree islands throughout the Everglades. These people participated in long distance trade and created platform mounds, many of which are still visible on the landscape today. Many oral histories from modern day Seminoles highlight the connection between these people and their ancestors. For example, a recording made at the Green Corn Dance ceremony on the Brighton Reservation in 1932 features songs about the Calusa and reveals an ancestral link (Densmore 1956). The Green Corn ceremony itself suggests a link between the modern and Mississippian people since this ritual has its roots in the platform mounds that were common throughout the Mississippian period (Wickman 1999:30). Seminole Tribe member Marty Bowers was always taught that he was a part of the Calusa, the Tequesta, or the Jaega (Bowers and Brindenstine 2017:25). The belief that these ancestral groups are extinct most likely stems from the cultural changes that each were undergoing during the post -contact period. For Europeans, the Calusa, Tequesta, and other cultural groups were static and non -adaptive, and their cultural makeup could only include what was written about them upon their encounter (Wickman 1999:2). If their cul- tural makeup changed, it meant that the group simply no longer existed. In the 1800s, the United States purposefully went out of their way to make sure that the native people in 19 Florida were thought of as outsiders. In order to make use of the fertile soil within Florida, the United States simply declared all indigenous populations in that area to be part of the Creek Nation. Like other native populations at the time, the Creek were labeled as such based on the English word that merely described the environment in which the people lived. In actuality, those labeled as Creeks consisted of at least 150 different linguistic groups (Wright 1986: 2, Wickman 1999:36). These groups were then lumped together as the Creek Nation. From this linguistic group comes the phrase isti Semoli, meaning "those who camp at a distance," "one who has camped out from the regular towns," or "free people at distance fires" (Frank 2014:278). In order to classify those individuals living in Florida, as "runaways," "fugitives," and "wild people," the United States government and their Creek allies began to refer to these people as Seminole. By changing the terminology, the United States government modified how these people were viewed, primarily so that land acquisition could occur easily (Frank 2014:278). Although the term Seminole has often been thought to have derived from the Spanish term cimmarron, the meaning and essence of the term is the same and fits the United States' agenda. As this brief history suggests, the names of the people living in and using the territory of Florida were of European construct and were not created by the native populations themselves. Instead, there were a variety of groups in Florida that were once known by different names and were simply lumped into the broad category of Seminole Creek by the Europeans, the United States, and Creek allies. While these people were comprised of different groups, it is likely that they were all interconnected through lines of communication, trade, warfare, and reciprocity (Wickman 1999:72). Based on the oral histories, it is most likely that today's Seminole Tribal members are descended from both native pre -contact Floridians as well as people that the Europeans encountered in Georgia, Alabama, and other locations throughout the southeast. Although we now base a population's location on modern geographical constructs, people in the pre - contact and contact periods came and went freely across state boundaries for thousands of years. People could have been moving during this time because of warfare, trade, communications, hunting, or marriage purposes (Wickman 1999:55). For example, Seminole Tribal member Willie Johns explains "Creek people were in Florida before the fight [Creek War] and Creek leaders have always known the Everglades, they hunted and fished it for decades before the Europeans" Qohns and Brindenstine 2017:4-5). Seminole Tribal member Billy Walker, a fourth generation descendant from those who fought in the Seminole Wars, noted that his clan, Panther Clan, is an older clan and comes from those Creek people who traveled to South Florida and had children with members of the Calusa bands (Walker 2019). He explains that the Calusa "are still their people today." Furthermore, groups of indigenous people, such as the Shawnee, who now reside outside of Florida, remember the territory once serving as their home (Wickman 1999:37). One Shawnee elder in Ohio recounted in 1819 that he came from West Florida near the Suwanee River and the sea. These accounts demonstrate a stark contrast to previous research that suggests that the Seminoles are not the direct descendants of the pre -contact Florida Natives, simply because they would not have crossed modern geopolitical boundaries (Wickman 1999:11). 20 Contact Period Settlements Information regarding contact period settlements in the literature is relatively sparse. Sites in South Florida dating prior to the eighteenth century are generally labeled as being related to particular cultural groups, though archaeologists rarely make ties between these groups and the Seminole. Settlements specifically associated with the Seminoles do not emerge in the literature until the eighteenth century and their characteristics are often based on early European accounts. Archaeological evidence of occupations at sites prior to this time and continuing into the eighteenth century would potentially highlight the tie between suppos- edly culturally extinct groups and modern Seminoles. For example, one site on the Brighton Reservation shows continuous occupation from approximately 375 B.C. until at least 1630 AD and highlights that the area was used even after Spanish contact. Due to the lack of in- formation available regarding pre -eighteenth century sites and their ties to modern day Seminole, this cultural summary will primarily focus on the historical documentation of set- tlements beginning in the early 1700s. However, future archaeological work focused on this period will allow us to gain more knowledge about the changing cultures and understand how this is reflected in the settlement make up. Archaeological Evidence of Site Occupation Following Spanish Contact Investigation of contact period sites within South Florida generally focus on Spanish ac- counts of the people living there. Radiocarbon dates from sites in this region show occupa- tion of large sites until roughly 1715 AD, approximately 200 years after the Spanish made contact with this area (Thompson et al 2016). According to Worth (2013:769), the sites of Mound Key and Pineland, both important Calusa centers, continued to be occupied from the time of Spanish contact until potentially the eighteenth century. However, at Pineland, the level of occupation during these latter periods was substantially less than the pre - contact occupations. Archaeologically, the Spanish arrival is noted in the appearance of Eu- ropean cultural material, such as Spanish majolica, though most of these items were only associated with the elite (Worth 2013:777). Although cultural material from this time is clear in the archaeological record, it is not known yet how site settlement patterns and lay- out changed within this period. While the Spanish made definitive contact with those people living along the southwest Florida coasts, it is not clear how the European's arrival affected settlement choices for in- terior populations. As mentioned previously, one site, 77BR00010, on the Brighton Reser- vation has a clear radiocarbon date from 1630 AD. Two sites on the Big Cypress Reserva- tion, 77BC00056 and 77BC00116, have four dates from faunal bone that date roughly to a similar time period. Site 77BC00056, Waxy Hadjo's Landing, has three dates that range from 1570 +/- 20 AD to 1640 +/-20 AD. This site also has clear documented use within the 19th century as a trading post for Waxy Hadjo. While there are very few sites within South Florida that have known 181h century radiocarbon dates, there are numerous villages 21 and towns in northern Florida that date to that period. However, these later sites are often labeled as Creek towns without thought for any pre-existing Florida populations living within them. Settlements of the 1700s Information regarding settlements in the 1700s is relegated to north and central Florida and predominately relates to people moving from Georgia and Alabama to the Alachua savanna of Florida. According to the STOF THPO GIS Portal (a web based map showing all Semi- nole related sites throughout the world), only three sites are associated with this period (Figure 6). Towns from the early eighteenth century were generally located in oak -hickory uplands, around ponds or lakes, or on ridgelines (Weisman 1989:4). The sites have a low artifact density, contain brushed pottery, and often go undiscovered. However, some of the early sites listed as pioneer cabins may have been inaccurately labeled and were actually in- digenous homesteads from this period (personal communication, Gary Ellis, 2016). By the mid-1700s, the villages encountered by Europeans were large and permanent in na- ture. By 1774, there were a number of documented, autonomously functioning Seminole towns (Weisman 2014:396). The largest of these towns were located on the banks of the Suwanee, the hammocks of the middle St. Johns River, and on the Chocachatti Prairie near Brooksville (Weisman 2014:396) (see Figure 6). During this time, people living in these towns were matrilocal, meaning that married couples resided in domiciles near or with the wife's mother's family (Covington 1993). They traced their lineage through matrilineal de- scent, where everything, including social status and clan membership, was inherited through the mother's heredity line (Covington 1993). The towns each had roughly 20 or more habi- tations, often had outlying settlements, and contained a squareground (Weisman 1989:43). Individual domiciles would also be located around this squareground area. The square - ground in these towns was the center of both the social life and settlements of the Creek and early Seminoles (Covington 1993; Weisman 1989, 1999, 2000a, 2000b). The central squareground was typically surrounded by four pavilions, which were constructed on the north, south, east, and west sides of the square. Usage of the number four, as seen in the construction of the squareground, remained pivotal in later camps; for example, when four logs were used to build the fire. To date, the number four remains important to the Semi- nole Tribe as it is an important piece of their religious functions. This highlights that while construction styles and settlement types changed, the basic cosmographic facets remained relatively constant. Artifacts recovered from these early towns include Lamar and Chatta- hoochee Brushed pottery as well as the Leon Jefferson series, which is associated with the Florida Mission period. Other artifacts from this time period include British military but- tons, razors, and knives, as well as personal adornments, such as buckles, silver coins, and glass beads. Although the pottery is of utilitarian ware, the metal and glass objects suggest trade with Europeans during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. 22 Settlements of the Late 17th and Early 18th Centuries Towards the end of the 18th century and the beginning of the nineteenth century, there is evidence of change in settlement patterns. This new pattern was better -suited for an agro- pastoralist subsistence lifestyle in which both agriculture and livestock were important commodities. This agro-pastoralist settlement style featured domiciles that were more widely dispersed and no longer centered around a squareground. These settlements were situated to maximize the subsistence potential of the land. Ideal land would include well - drained upland soils for crops such as maize, wetlands for rice agriculture, and pasture land for horses and cattle (Covington 1993; McReynolds 1957; Milanich 1995, 1998; Weisman 1989, 1999, 2000a, 2000b). Along with more dispersed domiciles, there were also multiple outbuildings that were historically documented to have been used as corn cribs, stables, dairies, and a "physic" house, where the sacred medicines were stored, as well as large, cleared agricultural fields (Weisman 2000b:145). A similar type of structure was recorded at the Billy Bowlegs III camp on the Brighton Reservation. This structure, termed a tufto, was round in shape and was once thought to have been used to dry corn and other food, but was also used to store a family's valuables. Lorene Gopher does not remember seeing this structure at any other camp on Brighton, but stated that her grandmother Lucy had told her that she had a tufto at the camp where she grew up, though this location is unknown (Lorene Gopher, Personal Communication, August 2012). As Martha Jones explains, "all of the older camps once had these structures but they had gone out of fashion over time" (Martha Jones, Personal Communication, December 2012). It is possible that fewer people used these structures during the Seminole war period since camps during that time were constantly being moved due to prolonged warfare. 23 Figure 5. Florida Indigenous Settlements in the early 1700s (based on the STOF THPO GIS Portal). 24 3.2.5 Seminole War Period (1816 - 1858) The nineteenth century witnessed three distinct wars fought on Florida soil: the First Seminole War (1816-1818), the Second Seminole War (1835-1842), and the Third Seminole War (1855-1858). It was the second of these wars that split the Seminole people into two separate groups. This war was fought over the Removal of the Seminoles from Florida and into reservation lands in Oklahoma. While this war never actually ended (Weisman [2000a] claims it simply faded away), the Americans removed several thousand Seminoles to Oklahoma over the course of the war. Hundreds more were removed to Oklahoma at the end of the Third Seminole as well, which left only an approximate two hundred Seminole in the Florida Peninsula. Weisman (2000a:302) stated that: By 1860, approximatey200 Seminoles remained in Florida, drastically reduced from an estimated 1821 level of 3,000... Those few Indians that survived in Florida after 1838 are directly ancestral to the contemporary Seminole and Miccosukee peoples... Those deported during the war era, numbering at least 4,000, were the founding population for the federally recogni.Zed Seminole [Nation] of Oklahoma. During this time period, there was a great deal of change in Seminole culture, especially during the Second Seminole War. Prior to the Second Seminole War, settlement patterns continued to follow the plantation -style settlements. The war, however, brought a disruption to this pattern. During, as well as after, the war the Seminoles in Florida began following a settlement pattern that was more traditional. This settlement form was based on the Creek huti, which were the matrilocal residences that made up a talwa. Alexander Spoehr (1941) called these istihapo. These clan camps were centered around a square ground (MacCauley 1887; Weisman 1989, 1999). This is clearly a reversion to former traditions. One change from the older squareground pattern was that rather than utilizing framed domiciles, the use of the famous Seminole chickee gains popularity. These constructions greatly resemble the buildings that surround the actual square ground in the traditional Creek talwa settlements in that they are a thatched roof over a wooden platform (these would have been wooden benches in the construction that surrounded the talwa squareground. Another of these reversions lies in the realm of material culture. Prior to the Second Seminole War the Seminole used European and American ceramics in overwhelming percentages over their indigenous brushed form of pottery. During and after the war, however, European and American ceramics are completely lacking from Seminole archaeological sites, while Seminole brushed pottery is found in abundance (Weisman 2000a). 25 During the war we see the rise to prominence many of the miccos such as Micanopy and Coacoochee, as well as war leaders such as Asi Yahola. The tradition of changing leadership during times of war and peace persisted during this time. Scholars agree that during this time a singular authority arose among the Seminole peoples in Florida. There were several miccos operating during this time (each one associated with a specific clan), but they deferred to a paramount micco, who during the war was Micanopy (Covington 1993; MacCauley 1887; Mahon 1967; McReynolds 1957; Missall and Missall 2004; Porter 1996; Weisman 1999). This continued in Florida throughout the remainder of this temporal period. While the Green Corn Dance was practiced before and after the wars, it provided the Seminoles with a sense of group cohesion which meant a larger pool of warriors to draw from for the conflict. While there are no descriptions of the actual ceremonies that took place during the war years, it is known that "Billy Bowlegs hosted at least one... in the Big Cypress" (Weisman 1999:63). Weisman further states that there were likely to have been many more held throughout the state. Directly after the war, however, there were additions to the ceremony. They added the use of medicine bundles. This was unique among the groups of the Southeast that practiced this ceremony (Hudson 1975; Weisman 1999). According to Weisman (1999), these medicine bundles were utilized in ceremony to give warriors supernatural powers in war. The end date for the Third Seminole War is used to determine the resolution of this period in history. In March 1858, Billy Bowlegs gathered with white officials to discuss removal of the Seminoles to what is known today as Oklahoma, yet no treaty was signed (Missall and Missall 2004). While research shows that there was a period of nearly unbroken violence from 1680 to 1858, the Seminole Wars, according to historians, started in 1816 with the First Seminole War (Missall and Missall 2004). The year 1856 marks the time during the Third Seminole War when the Florida Governor increased the number of federal troops to protect the Florida settlers (Covington 1993). 3.2.6 Post War Seminoles in the Everglades and Big Cypress Swamp After the end of the Seminole Wars in 1858, the remaining indigenous populations, consisting of what are now called Seminole, Miccosukee, and Traditionalists/Independents, continued to live in isolation. They made their camps around Lake Okeechobee and in the dense thickets of the Big Cypress Swamp and the Everglades. The Seminoles that settled in the swamps used elevated areas usually containing clumps of palm or oak trees called tree island hammocks. "These tree islands offered refuge and forage for animals, as well as camp sites for Indians traversing the `glades" (Kersey Jr. 1935). 26 Camp Life Seminole camps consisted of a "number of palm -thatched open -sided houses built around the outer zone of a clearing, with a cook house in the center" (Covington 1993:205). Each family in the camp had its own house. This dwelling served as sleeping quarters, a storage place for clothes, food, bedding, and other equipment in the house. According to Covington (1993:205), the equipment included mosquito nets, sewing machine, and in some cases, lard cans, and portable phonograph and records. The members of the permanent camps cultivated small plots during the summer and hunted from temporary camps for skins and meats during the winter. These Seminole camps contained garden plots that had potatoes, squash, corn, pumpkins, and bananas. All members of a clan lived in the same camp, except the married men who, due to the matrilineal kinship organization practiced by the Tribe, had gone to live in their wives' camps (Covington 1993: 149). The only time these camps came together was for occasions such as the Green Corn Dance and the Hunting Dance. The location of the Seminole camps made it difficult for anyone other than a Seminole to find the camp. One ethnographer, Clay MacCauley (1884), wrote that he had difficulty finding the Seminole people because of the "ignorance prevailing even in Florida of the locations of the homes of the Seminole and also to the absence of routes of travel in Southern Florida." Furthermore, he explains that even when one did stumble upon Seminole camps or individual Seminoles, very few spoke English, making conversations scarce. For this reason, very few settlers, including MacCauley, reached and communicated with the Seminoles. Although reaching Seminole Camps was difficult, some ethnographers, such as MacCauley, were able to still garner information about the Seminole camps and life ways. MacCauley states: The Florida Indians are not nomads. They have fixed habitations.- settlements in well-defined districts, permanent camps, houses or wigwams which, remain from year to year the abiding places of their families, and gardens and fields which for indefinite periods are used by the same owners [1884.25]. 27 3.3 The 20th Century in the Big Cypress Swamp and Everglades The 2011, Century brought drastic changes to the Big Cypress Swamp and the Everglades region. There were plans in motion to drain the Everglades, a land boom was occurring on the east coast of Florida, and the railroad had found its way to Miami. People had been moving down the west coast of Florida as well, and trading posts started popping up to accommodate the influx of settlers. This meant that there was more access than ever before to the Everglades and Big Cypress Swamp which allowed white settlers the opportunity to hunt and fish in the same areas that the Seminoles had been using. In the early 1900s, the Seminoles continued to live their traditional way of life deep in the heart of the Big Cypress and Everglades swamps. They had several camps set up throughout the Big Cypress Swamp and Everglades. Some were permanent in the dryer areas, while others were temporary hunting and fishing camps used to process fish and game before heading back to their primary camps. They had mastered the art of travel in the swamp lands by making shallow -draft dugout canoes from cypress trees which allowed them to travel several miles outside of their immediate camp area. They used miles of paths cut through the sawgrass to access remote areas of the swamp which allowed them to find the most productive areas to gather the resources needed to survive (Kersey Jr. 1935). By the 1910s the large influx of white settlers that had moved on to the fringes of the swamp needed a place to sell and trade their goods for supplies. Small trading posts began to pop up to accommodate the needs of the local population. Places like Smallwood's Store located in Chokoloskee, on the southwest edge of the Big Cypress Swamp, became popular spots for the Seminoles to bring furs, pelts, and plumes to trade. Opening in 1906, Smallwood's Store was the main Indian trading post in the region for decades. The owner of the store, Ted Smallwood, was very accommodating to the Seminoles and over time he had earned the trust of the Seminoles. They would leave their money there and Mr. Smallwood would keep it safe until their next visit. Mr. Smallwood's daughter, Thelma, recollects what it was like having the Seminoles frequent the store in an interview with Charlton Tebeau of the Chokoloskee Bay Country newspaper: To the store the Indians brought mostly alligator hides and other skins. Father's account books show that in 1914, for example he was buying alligator hides from Miami Billy, Little Jim Dixie, Little Charlie Jumper, Little Boy Jim, Jim Tiger, Charlie Billie, Charlie Doctor and Jack Osceola. The way the account is kept shows he might have been advancing them supplies and crediting them with the hides they brought in. Seven foot hides are marked at from ninety cents to a dollar a piece. Indians kept the islanders supplied with fresh venison and wild turkeys. Sometimes they tanned deer hides and brought in the buckskin. In season 28 they might bring in such wild fruits as huckleberries. Billy Jim used to sit at his camp near the shore on the beach and carve small canoes of wood, charging from twenty-five cents to a dollar depending on the size. Father sold to the Indians hand sewing machines, sewing thread and needles, yards of calico, phonographs and records and accordions. For food he sold them mostly sugar, flour and grits. Their principle item of food was sofkee which they liked to make from coarse grits and cook for hours. Formerly, they had grown their own corn and prepared it with mortar and pestle to make the sofkee. When we first knew them they would often roast garfish or turtles or bear meat at their camp fires, but more and more as time went on they bought grits and boiled the sofkee (Kersey Jr. 1935). For the Seminoles, the trips to the trading post may have been some of the only friendly encounters with white folks they had ever had. They generally kept their distance from whites while out in the swamp, but that was becoming more and more difficult as the local population grew. By the 1920s, the Seminoles were in direct competition for resources with some of the white settlers that had also mastered the art of survival in the swamp. These new white settlers were referred to as the "Gladesmen." The Gladesmen The Gladesmen were a group of early settlers that lived on the outskirts of the Big Cypress Swamp and Everglades in pioneer homesteads. Before they were given the term Gladesmen, they were referred to as Florida Crackers. They came to Florida in the early 1800s from neighboring states like Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee, in search of fertile land to farm. It is believed that the term "Florida Cracker" originated from the practices used to herd cattle and the cracking sound their whips made. These early set- tlers relied mainly on agriculture for their livelihood by herding free range cattle left behind by the Spanish in the early 1820s (Denham 1994). In the early 1900s, white settlers, or at that time Florida Crackers had begun to move south with the understanding that the Everglades was to be drained. They planned on raising live- stock and farming the rich soil left once the water level dropped. Realizing that their new environment could provide a source of income and sustain their way of life, many aban- doned their free range cattle practices and begun to rely on the environment to survive. They lived in pioneer homesteads on the dry land and set up temporary hunting camps throughout the swamps and wetlands for hunting and fishing. Like the Seminoles, the Gladesmen traded their hides, pelts, and bird plumes at nearby trading posts, tended gar- dens at their homesteads, and were completely self-sufficient (Smith 2011). 29 The Tamiami Trail and Tourism In 1928 the first paved road through the Everglades was completed connecting the east and west coasts of Florida. The road started in Tampa and continued down the west coast, turning east at Naples, then across the Everglades in to Miami, hence the name, Tamiami Trail. The Tamiami Trail initially had a negative effect on the Seminoles because it cut across their canoe trails and impeded their traditional manner of travel (West 1998:84). However, the completion of the Tamiami Trail and Tamiami Canal led to an increase in tourism in south Florida, as well as a subsequent increase in the number of Seminole men who became owners of tourist camps and trading posts, such as Mike Osceola's Indian Village Gator Jungle (Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum website). Other Seminoles with camps along the Tamiami Trail included William McKinley Osceola, Josie Billie, Chestnut Billie, Corey Osceola, John- ny Osceola, Ingram Billie, and Robert Billie (West 1998:84). Use of these camps was a good way for the Seminoles to trade with coastal towns and the villages replaced the white - owned exhibition villages (Sturtevant and Cattelino 2004:438). The tourist camps were also important because they marked an "increased economic independence for these Native Americans separate from the white -operated attractions in the city' (West 1998:85). Semi- noles charged admission and sold patchwork clothing, dolls, sweetgrass baskets, and wood carvings (Sturtevant and Cattelino 2004:438). One of the earliest Indian owned and operat- ed tourist attractions established on the Tamiami Trail was run by Effie and Ingraham Bil- lie; Billie was a traditional councilman, doctor, and medicine bundle carrier (West 1998:82). The Tamiami Canal was also convenient for travel in dugout canoes. The Tamiami Trail also led to many Seminoles being hired as hunting guides or to being contracted to procure games for clients, because the Seminoles did not have to acquire a license to hunt and could hunt year round (West 1998:88). Those Seminoles living along the Tamiami Trail could also supplement their income through seasonal crop picking (West 1998:92). Additionally, the Tamiami Trail helped to integrate groups that were previously separated by geography, and many villages along the Tamiami Trail were used as off-season abodes for those who living in Big Cypress of the Miami -Fort Lauderdale region (West 1998:92-93). According to West (1998:85), Tamiami Trail villages were typically surrounded by an 8-foot fence made of palmetto fronds with a modest selection of crafts and clothing for sale; visi- tors entered through a chickee where an attendant collected the entrance fee. In 1930 Roy Nash made a map showing the locations of Seminole Camps located throughout Florida (Figure 7). Roy Nash was an Indian agent who visited with the Seminoles in the 1930s to try and learn more about them in order to advise the government on how to help them as- similate in to the white man's way of life. Of the camps he recorded in south Florida, sever- al of the Seminoles from those camps were regular traders at Smallwood's Store: Josie Bil- lie, Ingraham Billie, Doctor Tiger, Charlie Cypress, Charlie Tommie, and Charlie Jumper, all 30 had camps that can be found on Nash's 1930 map. There are some traditionalists that still, to this day, live along the Tamiami Trail and surrounding areas in chickees and practice tra- ditional Seminole ways. National Parks While development and settlers certainly affected the landscape of the Everglades and Big Cypress swamp, the creation of the Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve further shaped how people used and occupied this region. Everglades National Park In 1947, the National Park Service set aside 1.5 million acres of land and created the Ever- glades National Park in order to help protect the largest sub -tropical wilderness in the Unit- ed States (National Geographic 2009). Overdevelopment and draining had caused serious harm to the flora and fauna of the Everglades and altered the flow of water causing irre- versible damage. An agreement between the Miccosukee Tribe and the Federal Govern- ment allowed the Miccosukee to settle in the areas along the Tamiami Trail, and also allows both the Seminole and Miccosukee Tribes to continue to utilize the Everglades for their traditional cultural purposes. The creation of the park also helped to protect the remaining Everglades ecosystems and environment and to preserve what remains of the native land- scape that the Seminole and Miccosukee Indians call home. Big Cypress National Preserve The Big Cypress National Preserve is a 720,000-acre preserve located in southwest Florida, on the northwestern corner of the Everglades. The Big Cypress National Preserve was es- tablished in 1974, along with Big Thicket National Preserve in Texas, as the first national preserves in the National Park System (National Park Service 2018). The preserve was created to prevent development and urban sprawl from destroying the many ecosystems that make up the Big Cypress swamp. Originally, the Big Cypress swamp was supposed to part of Everglades National Park, but those that utilized the swamp for recreation or cultural practices, like the Seminole and Miccosukee Indians, didn't want Big Cypress to fall under the auspices of the National Park Service. With the creation of a na- tional preserve, those who wanted were allowed to continue accessing Big Cypress for spe- cific activities legislated by Congress for things like hunting, camping, hiking, and using rec- reational vehicles. More importantly, this allowed the Seminole and Miccosukee Indians to continue using the land for recreational and traditional cultural purposes (National Park Service 2018). 31 elxe #7 !6.�, 36 J! wa cruel" wa♦s 11 ♦rrn. our ...(.... V[.. f l lRa Iq LA J&, /AL/IR .10[Nlr � ..=A—ft rO= I I (IIRII.N ♦[We[Al bK .I lwM[(f CRn.n •i!b MQ4f..t .bIM �'['.' � 1[Mltr .�CVTR •�M fa1(R . iwh!♦H�tR /I ul>".(GMI[nNlitMr[+P:+r !T.••nww tt ClM.R JI 4u. MUT.1 �rrf/! APPROXIMATE LOCATION or PERMANENT SEMINOLE CAMPS 1930 Rf.7fR(Ir.JN7 M (l041/I • Y♦!Mf CI.vTY. 1M1�A4�'.w wy Its re/ RM! I 21. r--- Figure 7. 1930 Map of Seminole Camp Locations made by Indian Agent Roy Nash. 32 4.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 4.1 Archival Research Results The TAS reviewed the THPO GIS geodatabases which indicated that six cultural resource surveys have been previously completed within 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) of the APE (Table 1). None of these surveys overlap the Glover Property APE. Table 1. Previous Surveys within 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) of the Glover Property APE. SHPO Survey Report Title Publication Author Sponsoring #Old\New Identified Sites\ Number Date Survey Structures Historical/Architectural Survey of Florida Preser- 120 Newly 1108 Collier County, Florida 1986 vation Services Collier County Identified Sites The Big Cypress National Robert Carr, John 427 Preserve Archaeological Survey, 1978 Ehrenhard, Rob- National Park N\A Phase I, II and III, Big Cypress ert Taylor Service National Preserve, Florida The Big Cypress National 63 Previously Preserve Archaeological Survey, John Ehrenhard, National Park Recorded Sites, 1278 Season 3, Big Cypress National 1980 Robert Taylor Service 4 Newly Identified Preserve, Florida Sites The Big Cypress National John Ehrenhard, 734 Preserve Archaeological Survey, 1980 Robert Taylor, National Park N\A Season 4, Big Cypress National Service Preserve, Florida Gregory Komara A Phase One Assessment of the 10451 Proposed House Site, Big 2003 John Beriault Seminole Tribe 1 Newly Identified Cypress National Preserve, of Florida Site Collier County, Florida Cultural Resource Assessment Survey U.S. 41 Bridge Guardail 8 Previously Retrofit and Shoulder Archaeological Recorded Sites, 18271 Improvements, Collier, Florida; 2011 Consultants, Inc. FDOT District 1 46 Newly Financial Project ID NO: 417248-4 Identified Sites -52-01 33 A review of the Florida Master Site File and Seminole Site File indicates that six sites and two resource features have been discovered within 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) of the APE (Table 2). One of the resource features, CR00928, Tamiami Canal, overlaps the current APE (Figure 9). The other resource feature, CR00927, US-41, is within 30 meters (98 feet) of the current APE. This review included National Register Listed Properties, Pending National Register Nominations and National Historic Landmarks. Table 2. Previously Recorded Sites and Resource Features within 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) of the Glover Property APE. Florida Master Site File # Site Name Site Type Cultural Period Site Evaluation Not evaluated by 08CR00161 Paolitta Station Seminole 1716-present SHPO Not evaluated by 08CR00162 Seminole Camp Seminole Camp 1716-present SHPO OSCR00256 NN (BICY 115) Prehistoric Midden Glades 1-II Eligible 08CR00292 NN (BICY 203) Prehistoric Camp Site Glades Eligible NN (BICY 256)/ 08CR00377 Hunter's Hammock Seminole Camp 1716 present Eligible 08CR001148 US41 Lights on Canal Bridge Historic 1949 Ineligible 08CR00927 US-41 Historic 1928-present Eligible 08CR00928 Tamiami Canal Historic 1928-present Eligible 4.1.1 Probability Zones Assessment Based on the background information, the TAS labeled the APE as containing both moder- ate and low probability zones. The moderate probability zone was located in the northern portion of the APE due to the presence of a cypress dome in that area and since oral histo- ries suggest that the edges of these regions were used for cleaning animals after hunting. The low probability zone was situated in the southern portion of the APE due to previous development in that region. While the southern portion of the APE does contain 8CR00928, the Tamiami Canal, this is a linear, built up resource in which further shovel testing would not aid in it's assessment. Rather, the TAS completed archival research to as- sess this resource feature. 34 4.2 Architectural Analysis Results Archival and documentary architectural investigations were conducted on April 30, 2013 by Carrie Dilley (Architectural Historian, THPO). The document analysis focused on those structures fifty years old or older. Historic physical integrity was determined from back- ground research including examination of photographic documentation and previously completed field analyses. The architectural historian determined that no historic structures or buildings are present within the APE and therefore no historic structures will be impact- ed by the undertaking. 4.3 Archaeological Survey Results The fieldwork portion of the Glover Property investigations included pedestrian walkover and subsurface shovel testing components. 4.3.1 Pedestrian Survey Results The pedestrian survey revealed that the APE is located in an area of total disturbance due to the previous construction of multiple buildings, a driveway, utilities, and construction fill. Vegetation within the APE consists of melaleuca and grasses. No cultural resources were discovered during the pedestrian survey. 4.3.2 Shovel Test Results The TAS excavated 2 shovel tests as part of the 2013-050 project (Figure 8). Of these shov- el tests, both were negative for cultural material. The shovel testing revealed the presence of one stratigraphic layer within the APE (Table 3). The layers of stratigraphy consisted of brown and very dark brown sands and fill. The shovel tests ranged in depth from 20 centimeters (8 inches) below the ground surface (cmbs) to 29 cmbs (11 inches). These shovel tests were terminated prior to reaching 100 cmbs (39 inches) due to encountering water. Disturbance within the APE was total due to the previous construction of buildings. Both shovel tests were offset due to standing water. No shovel tests could be excavated in the northwestern portion of the APE due to standing water. No shovel tests could be excavated in the southern portion of the APE due to devel- opment and dense construction fill. 35 Table 3. Shovel Test Descriptions for the Glover Property APE. Shovel Test Number Stratum Designation, Munsell Number and Color Depth (cmbs) Reason for Termination Shovel Test Results I: 10YR2/2 Very Dark Brown Sand and Fill 0-20 1 Water Negative 2 I: 10YR5/3 Brown Sand 0-29 Water Negative 36 H'y - t, *j Y=� r! ys v y _ 1 •% tfi - +. r^. i, 'r OP 90 120 IS 7em-15701-e Tribe of IF,lorida G iu . i 9, uyri t y i T MP0 Pi of vbe i 20 t 3 0501 ,N- T.,k Glover ProWr1Y APE ... � �. . • . y"mow i StroaK 2013-050. NapaOw Showl Tncrc 0,4�i - LIM RIM ,,,.Iu L...sr `t • �1TMT� •. Figure 8. Shovel Test Locations within the Glover Property APE. 37 71 74 *.4s � � ,ter w, .�� tr •. � i �F Ilk •�} .� !, i ''+. � 1, .• � IT �• w � �` rah, ,� �. • '��-'•:� . � "' � � n � r ` , a�.Z�. ^!�'• 0 ,r i tom' �� .r�� t it. p • ' ,►m Meters Seminole Tribe of Florida GI•+•r = :ce t. "»r= P•o1.Ct Nanb* 2017-0501 _j Glove Prop•ry APE ��-'�=^��.'.• .:�i•�--! a MOM 4.,,,,�, �. .a... .v:aw• ann A .< 't• M.+.r•vMw.a�r fir l�,p� if Ri., Yt��J1�Ye.• Figure 9. Location of Resource Groups Overlapping and within 30 Meters of the Glover Property APE. 38 4.3.3 Resource Feature Results 08CR0O927 Resource Feature Number: 08CR00927 Resource Feature Name: Tamiami Trail Components: Historic Road Cultural -Temporal Affiliation: American 20th Century Resource Feature Type: Historic Road Quadrangle: Royal Palm Hammock, Ochopee, Burns Lake, Gator Hook Swamp, Monroe Station, Fifty Mile Bend, FL (1983), 7.5', USGS TOPO UTM Coordinates (Z17, NAD83): At central portion of resource feature - N 2862286 E 476144 Resource Feature Size and Shape: The resource feature is linear in shape and measures 101,970 meters (334,547 feet) long by 7 meters (24 feet) wide. The total area of the resource feature is 71 hectares (176 acres). Soils: Basinger, Boca, Ft. Drum, Malabar, Hallandale, Holopaw, Hilolo, Jupiter, Immokalee, Riviera, Oldsmar, Pineda, Udorthents, and Urban Land Fine Sands; Durbin and Wulfert Muck; Estero and Peckish Soils; and Kesson Muck Vegetation: Vegetation within the resource feature boundary consists of plants commonly found in the Everglades environment, which may include palm, palmetto, oak, pine, mela- leuca, wild coffee, Brazilian pepper, smilax, ivy, muscadine grape, beauty berry, grasses, Caesar's weed, and ferns. Surface Visibility: 0% due to the presence of asphalt Previous Disturbance: Disturbance within the resource feature boundary is total in places where the road has been widened and intersections and guardrails have been added. Previous Investigations In 2008, the SHPO determined that the portion of the Tamiami Trail which starts from the north boundary of Collier -Seminole State Park running eastward to CR-92 was potentially eligible for the NRHP (Figure 10). The SHPO also noted that the eligibility status possibly continued east of CR-92. Investigations by Janus Research Inc. in 2005 and 2006, as well as by Archaeological Consulting, Inc. (ACI) in 2011 and 2014 determined this portion of the Trail was eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A in the area of Community, Planning, and Development for the critical role the Trail played in the development of Florida by linking two of its major cities (Tampa and Miami), as well as for historic associations with Barron Collier and James Jaudon (Hooks 2011). Further, the Tamiami Trail is eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C in the area of Engineering for its pioneering efforts in the dredge - and -fill practices to traverse the Everglades, as well as South Florida waterway management (Hooks 2011). Based on the FMSF documents, no shovel tests have been excavated in the resource fea- ture boundary. 39 Resource Feature History ACI identified the period of significance for the Tamiami Trail as being 1913-1928 which covers the time from the initial surveys for the Tamiami Trail through its completion (Hooks 2011). In 1913, a Miami developer named James F. Jaudon (Photograph 1) came up with the idea of constructing a roadway that would cut through the Everglades and run from Miami to Fort Myers (Hooks 2011). A Tampa businessman, E.P. Dickey, suggested this route be extended to Tampa and this inspired the name "Tamiami" for this route (Hooks 2011). Surveying for the Tamiami Trail began in 1915 and was led by Seminole guides Qohnston n.d.:87-90). The total cost of this undertaking would end up costing $13 million (Hooks 2011). In 1917, twenty thousand acres of land in the Everglades was purchased by Jaudon and two other businessmen, L.T. Highleyman and R.R. McDonald, from the Internal Improvement Board (Hooks 2011). Funding was provided by J.B. McCrary Co. of Atlanta, Georgia, and the bid to begin the work of building the first paved road through the Everglades was awarded to the Morgan Paving Co. (Hooks 2011). The work encountered some difficulties in 1918, when the Morgan Paving Co. had to halt work due to fluctuations in water level as well as financial difficulties caused by World War I (Hooks 2011). However, Jaudon was not deterred and continued surveying and in 1923, he organized a motorcade, known as the "Trail Blazers," to support his claim of the viability of the Tami- ami Trail (Photographs 2-3) (Gaby 1993:63). The expedition was problematic but ultimately successful and it managed to generate enough publicity to get the Tamiami Trail completed, even though the completion was under new leadership, with new funding, and across new lands that were acquired by the state's largest landowner, millionaire tycoon Barron Gift Collier (Photograph 4) (Hooks 2011). Construction resumed under Collier, who owned over a million acres in Lee County (Hooks 2011). In 1923, Collier guaranteed the Tamiami Trail would be completed as long as that the road would be re-routed through a new coun- ty that would be established and named after him (Burnett 1988:41-44). Jaudon was not happy about the re-routing because it superseded his original Chevalier Bay tract (Hooks 2011). Collier hired D. Graham Copeland as the chief engineer of his firm, Alexander, Ramsey, & Kerr, Inc. in order to complete the Tamiami Trail (Hooks 2011). It took five years and forty thousand pounds of dynamite to remove the limestone rock which was used to support the adjacent roadway (Hooks 2011). Once the Tamiami Trail was completed on April 26, 1928, it became the only reliable east - west transportation route across South Florida (Photographs 5-8) (Taylor 2006). The Tami- ami Trail made transportation across state, as well as the transportation of goods, easier; it also encouraged settlement in the region and provided scenic views of the Everglades for travelers and tourists (Taylor 2006). Over time, changes were made to the original Tamiami Trail. For example, according to the USACE and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), in 1946, the state of Florida 40 funded the construction of several bridges so that water could pass beneath the Tamiami Trail. In 1951, these bridges were removed and culverts were placed under the road to al- low water to flow underneath the Tamiami Trail. Hooks (2011) added that 41 bridges had construction dates originating from 1941 to the mid-1950's with reconstruction dates show- ing a bridge maintenance pattern in 1949, 1956, and 1965. Reconstruction of the bridges included modifications of the original form, features, and details; the bridges were main- tained in situ and some of the bridges original components remained intact (Hooks 2011). Furthermore, the 41 bridges and one culvert are considered non-contributing resources as they replaced the wooden bridge from 1928, and, therefore do not date to the period of sig- nificance for the Tamiami Trail (Hooks 2011). The Tamiami Trail passes through Old Florida towns such as Ochopee and Carnestown. The roadsides feature views of the Everglades, as well as a few commercial establishments which support ecotourism. The Tamiami Trail also passes through areas with Native Amer- ican villages and natural preserves (Hooks 2011) (Photographs 9-10). The Tamiami Trail initially had a negative effect on the Seminoles because it cut across their canoe trails and impeded their traditional manner of travel (West 1998:84). However, the completion of the Tamiami Trail and Tamiami Canal led to an increase in tourism in south Florida, as well as a subsequent increase in the number of Seminole men who became owners of tourist camps and trading posts, such as Mike Osceola's Indian Village Gator Jungle (Ah-Tah-Thi- Ki Museum website). Other Seminoles with tourist camps along the Tamiami Trail included William McKinley Osceola, Josie Billie, Chestnut Billie, Corey Osceola, Johnny Osceola, Ingram Billie, and Robert Billie (West 1998:84) (Photographs 11-16). Use of these camps was a good way for the Seminoles to trade with coastal towns and the villages replaced the white -owned exhibition villages (Sturtevant and Cattelino 2004:438). The tourist camps were also important because they marked an "increased economic independence for these Native Americans separate from the white -operated attractions in the city" (West 1998:85). Seminoles charged admission and sold patchwork clothing, dolls, sweetgrass baskets, and wood carvings (Sturtevant and Cattelino 2004:438). One of the earliest Indian owned and operated tourist attractions established on the Tamiami Trail was run by Effie and Ingra- ham Billie; Billie was a traditional councilman, doctor, and medicine bundle carrier (West 1998:82). The Tamiami Canal was also convenient for travel in dugout canoes. The Tamiami Trail also led to many Seminoles being hired as hunting guides or to being contracted to procure games for clients, because the Seminoles did not have to acquire a license to hunt and could hunt year round (West 1998:88). Those Seminoles living along the Tamiami Trail could also supplement their income through seasonal crop picking (West 1998:92). Additionally, the Tamiami Trail helped to integrate groups that were previously separated by geography and many villages along the Tamiami Trail were used as off-season abodes for those who living in Big Cypress of the Miami -Fort Lauderdale region (West 1998:92-93). 41 According to West (1998:85), Tamiami Trail villages were typically surrounded by an 8 foot fence made of palmetto fronds with a modest selection of crafts and clothing for sale; visi- tors entered through a chickee where an attendant collected the entrance fee. According to Taylor (2006): There is a noticeable change in the character, setting, and feeling of the road at the northern boundary of the Collier -Seminole State Park, which also marks the begin- ning of the Tamiami Trail Scenic Highway and National Scenic Byway. The 50-mile Scenic Highway and Byway travels east through the Picayune Strand State Forest, the Fakahatchee Stand State Preserve, and the Big Cypress Natural Preserve. In this section, the roadway and canal travel through natural areas with scenic vistas that continue to convey a sense of the past. Within this portion of the Tamiami Trail, modem development disappears, the road narrows, and a canopy of vegetation en- gulfs the road. Outside of this area, the Tamiami Trail and Tamiami Canal "no longer convey the appear- ance, setting, or feeling of a rural road through unspoiled wilderness... modern housing de- velopments increasingly encroach into the setting, and in places, the Canal is no longer readily visible" (Taylor 2006). Resource Feature Components Historically, the Tamiami Trail was composed of shellrock and/or limestone and had no barriers flanking the road (Taylor 2006). The subtropical environment around the Tamiami Trail has been replaced in many areas by development. Today, the Tamiami Trail is approx- imately 443 kilometers (275 miles) in length and 7 meters (24 feet) wide and consists of two 4 meter (12 foot) lanes with 1 meter (2 feet) shoulders. The Tamiami Trail was initially only 6 meters (20 feet) wide, but has expanded due to the addition of shoulders and guardrails in 1968. The Tamiami Trail is now paved with asphalt and flanked with metal guardrails on both sides of the road that also separate it from the Tamiami Canal (Taylor 2006). Intersec- tions and turn lanes have been added, along with traffic lights (Taylor 2006). 42 TAS Recommendation The TAS recommends that resource feature 08CR00927, Tamiami Trail, is eligible for list- ing on the TRHP under criterion i, a property Seminole people consider important to histo- ry due to its role in shaping Seminole involvement in the tourist industry. ACI's work, along with the SHPO, recommended that a portion of resource feature 08CR00927, Tamiami Trail, is eligible for listing on the NRHP under criterion A, Community, Planning, and De- velopment, for the critical role it played in the development of Florida by linking two of its major cities, Tampa and Miami, as well as for its historical associations with Barron Collier and James Jaudon. Resource feature 08CR00927 is also eligible under criterion C in the area of engineering for its pioneering effort in dredge -and -fill practices in order to traverse the Everglades. This technique became an adopted and responsible technique that was vital to Everglades and South Florida waterway management. The portion of 08CR00927 which is eligible for listing on the NRHP stretches from the north boundary of the Collier -Seminole State Park eastward to CR-92. The TAS agrees with the above stated previous recommen- dations of ACI and the SHPO. 43 Figure 10. Map of Resource Feature 08CR00927. 44 Photograph 1. Captain James F. Jaudon. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 2. Blazing a Trail through Swamps and Everglades. Florida Memory Site. 45 Photograph 3. Tamiami Trail Blazers holding sign, Tamiami Trail, Florida. 1923. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 4. Barron G. Collier. Florida Memory Site. 46 Photograph 5. Seminole Indians on the courthouse steps in Everglades City during open- ing of the Tamiami Trail, ca 1928. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 6. Town of Everglades celebrates the opening of the Tamiami Trail, 1928. Florida Memory Site. 47 • Photograph 7. View down the road along canal, Tamiami Trail, Florida, 1927. Florida Memory Site. r-m Photograph 8. Two cars running on the road by canal, Tamiami Trail, Florida, 1927. Florida Memory Site. 48 Photograph 9. Along Tamiami Trail in the Florida Everglades, 1945. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 10. Seminole on the Tamiami Trail, Florida,192-. Florida Memory Site. 49 Photograoh 11. Osceola's Gift Shop and Indian Village along the Tamiami Trail, 195-. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 12. Seminole Indian John Osceola and his daughter doing the family wash on the Tamiami Trail, 1956. Florida Memory Site. F � r 50 Photograph 13. Two Seminole women at Chestnut Billy's camp on the Tamiami Trail, 191-. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 14. Chestnut Billy's Mikasuki Indian Camp on the Tamiami Trail. Florida Memory Site. Hc[CI '"` 'ifs � •���_ � .�'. lrI l 't�r y r 51 tiCOW 1, 7 o E�_ Photograph 15. Aerial view of the Tamiami Trail at Miami - Dade County, Florida, 1947. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 16. Seminole Indian village along the Tamiami Trail in Florida, 1954. Ah- Tah-Thi-Ki Museum Collection. 52 08CR00928 Resource Feature Number: 08CR00928 Resource Feature Name: Tamiami Canal Components: Historic Canal Cultural -Temporal Affiliation: American 20th Century Resource Feature Type: Canal Quadrangle: Royal Palm Hammock, Ochopee, Burns Lake, Gator Hook Swamp, Monroe Station, Fifty Mile Bend, FL (1983), 7.5', USGS TOPO UTM Coordinates (Z17, NAD83): At central portion of resource feature - N 2862286 E 476144 Resource Feature Size and Shape: The resource feature is linear in shape and measures 101,970 meters (334,547 feet) long by 18 meters (59 feet) wide. The total area of the re- source feature is 184 hectares (454 acres). Soils: Basinger, Boca, Ft. Drum, Malabar, Hallandale, Holopaw, Hilolo, Jupiter, Immokalee, Riviera, Oldsmar, Pineda, Udorthents, and Urban Land Fine Sands; Durbin and Wulfert Muck; Estero and Peckish Soils; and Kesson Muck Vegetation: Vegetation within the resource feature boundary consists of plants commonly found in the Everglades environment, which may include palm, palmetto, oak, pine, mela- leuca, wild coffee, Brazilian pepper, smilax, ivy, muscadine grape, beauty berry, grasses, Caesar's weed, and ferns. Surface Visibility: 0% due to the presences of water. Previous Disturbance: Disturbance within the resource feature boundary is moderate in places where dredging has occurred. Previous Investigations In 2008, the SHPO determined that the portion of the Tamiami Canal which starts from the north boundary of Collier -Seminole State Park and runs eastward to CR-92 was potentially eligible for the NRHP (Figure 11). The SHPO also noted that the eligibility status possibly continued east of CR-92. Investigations by Janus Research Inc. in 2005 and 2006, as well as by Archaeological Consulting, Inc. (ACI) in 2011 and 2014, determined this portion of the Tamiami Canal was eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A in the area of Community, Planning, and Development for the critical role the Trail played in the development of Flor- ida by linking two of its major cities (Tampa and Miami), as well as for historic associations with Barron Collier and James Jaudon (Hooks 2011). Further, the Tamiami Canal is eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C in the area of Engineering for its pioneering efforts in the dredge -and -fill practices to traverse the Everglades, as well as South Florida waterway man- agement (Hooks 2011). Based on FMSF documents, no shovel tests have been excavated in the resource feature boundary. 53 Resource Feature History ACI identified the period of significance for the Tamiami Canal as being 1913-1928 which covers the time from the initial surveys for the Tamiami Canal through its completion (Hooks 2011). The construction of the Tamiami Canal is inextricably linked to the con- struction of the Tamiami Trail. Materials dredged from the canal were used to form the roadbed of the Tamiami Trail. In 1913, a Miami developer named James F. Jaudon came up with the idea of constructing a roadway that would cut through the Everglades and run from Miami to Fort Myers (Hooks 2011). A Tampa businessman, E.P. Dickey, suggested this route be extended to Tampa and this inspired the name "Tamiami" for this route (Hooks 2011). Surveying for the Tamiami Trail began in 1915 and was led by Seminole guides Qohnston n.d.:87-90). The total cost of this undertaking would end up costing $13 million (Hooks 2011). In 1917, twenty thousand acres of land in the Everglades was purchased by Jaudon and two other businessmen, L.T. Highleyman and R.R. McDonald, from the Internal Improvement Board (Hooks 2011). Funding was provided by J.B. McCrary Co. of Atlanta, Georgia, and the bid to begin the work of building the first paved road through the Everglades was awarded to the Morgan Paving Co. (Hooks 2011). The work encountered some difficulties in 1918, when the Morgan Paving Co. had to halt work due to the environment as well as financial difficulties caused by World War I (Hooks 2011). However, Jaudon was not deterred and continued surveying and, in 1923, he organized a motorcade, known as the "Trail Blazers," to support his claim of the viability of the Tami- ami Trail (Gaby 1993:63). The expedition was problematic, but ultimately successful and it managed to generate enough publicity to get the Trail completed, even though the comple- tion was under new leadership, with new funding, and across new lands that were acquired by the state's largest landowner, millionaire tycoon Barron Gift Collier (Hooks 2011). Con- struction resumed under Collier, who owned over a million acres in Lee County (Hooks 2011). In 1923, Collier guaranteed the Tamiami Trail would be completed as long as the road was re-routed through a new county that would be established and named after him (Burnett 1988:41-44). Jaudon was not happy about the re-routing because it superseded his original Chevalier Bay tract (Hooks 2011). Collier hired engineer D. Graham Copeland as the chief engineer of his firm, Alexander, Ramsey, & Kerr, Inc. in order to complete the Tamiami Trail (Hooks 2011). It took five years and forty thousand pounds of dynamite to remove the limestone rock which was used to support the adjacent roadway (Hooks 2011). Hooks noted that "when the Trail opened on April 26, 1928, it marked the unofficial end to the pioneer period in Collier County and indeed South Florida, as the real estate boom failure precipitated a recession followed by the Great Depression" (2011). 54 Once the Tamiami Trail was completed, it became the major east -west transportation route across South Florida (Photographs 17-19) (Taylor 2006). The Tamiami Trail made trans- portation across state, as well as the transportation of goods, easier; it also encouraged set- tlement in the region and provided scenic views of the Everglades for travelers and tourists (Taylor 2006). Over time, changes were made to the original Tamiami Trail. For example, according to the USACE and FDOT, in 1946, the state of Florida funded the construction of several bridges so that water could pass beneath the Tamiami Trail. In 1951, these bridges were removed and culverts were placed under the road to allow water to flow underneath the Tamiami Trail. Hooks (2011) added that 41 bridges had construction dates originating from 1941 to the mid-1950's with reconstruction dates showing a bridge maintenance pattern in 1949, 1956, and 1965. Reconstruction of the bridges included modifications of the original form, features, and details; the bridges were maintained in situ and some of the bridges original components remained intact (Hooks 2011). Furthermore, the 41 bridges and one culvert are considered non-contributing resources as they replaced the wooden bridge from 1928, and, therefore do not date to the period of significance for the Tamiami Trail (Hooks 2011). The Tamiami Trail passes through Old Florida towns such as Ochopee and Carnestown. The roadsides feature views of the Everglades, as well as a few commercial establishments which support ecotourism. The Tamiami Trail also passes through areas with Native Amer- ican villages and natural preserves (Hooks 2011). The Tamiami Trail initially had a negative effect on the Seminoles because it cut across their canoe trails and impeded their traditional manner of travel (West 1998:84). However, the completion of the Tamiami Trail and Tami- ami Canal led to an increase in tourism in south Florida, as well as a subsequent increase in the number of Seminole men who became owners of tourist camps and trading posts, such as Mike Osceola's Indian Village Gator Jungle (Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum website). Other Seminoles with tourist camps along the Tamiami Trail included William McKinley Osceola, Josie Billie, Chestnut Billie, Corey Osceola, Johnny Osceola, Ingram Billie, and Robert Billie (West 1998:84). Use of these camps was a good way for the Seminoles to trade with coastal towns and the villages replaced the white -owned exhibition villages (Sturtevant and Catteli- no 2004:438). The tourist camps were also important because they marked an "increased economic independence for these Native Americans separate from the white -operated at- tractions in the city" (West 1998:85). Seminoles charged admission and sold patchwork clothing, dolls, sweetgrass baskets, and wood carvings (Sturtevant and Cattelino 2004:438). One of the earliest Indian owned and operated tourist attractions established on the Tami- ami Trail was run by Effie and Ingraham Billie; Billie was a traditional councilman, doctor, and medicine bundle carrier (West 1998:82). The Tamiami Canal was also convenient for travel in dugout canoes. The Tamiami Trail also led to many Seminoles being hired as hunting guides or to being contracted to procure games for clients, because the Seminoles did not have to acquire a license to hunt and could hunt year round (West 1998:88). Those Seminoles living along the 55 Tamiami Trail could also supplement their income through seasonal crop picking (West 1998:92). Additionally, the Tamiami Trail helped to integrate groups that were previously separated by geography, and many villages along the Tamiami Trail were used as off-season abodes for those who living in Big Cypress or the Miami -Fort Lauderdale region (West 1998:92-93). According to West (1998:85), Tamiami Trail villages were typically surrounded by an 8 foot fence made of palmetto fronds with a modest selection of crafts and clothing for sale; visi- tors entered through a chickee where an attendant collected the entrance fee. According to Taylor (2006): There is a noticeable change in the character, setting, and feeling of the road at the northern boundary of the Collier -Seminole State Park, which also marks the begin- ning of the Tamiami Trail Scenic Highway and National Scenic Byway. The 50-mile Scenic Highway and Byway travels east through the Picayune Strand State Forest, the Fakahatchee Stand State Preserve, and the Big Cypress Natural Preserve. In this section, the roadway and canal travel through natural areas with scenic vistas that continue to convey a sense of the past. Within this portion of the Tamiami Trail, modem development disappears, the road narrows, and a canopy of vegetation en- gulfs the road. Outside of this area, the Tamiami Trail and Tamiami Canal "no longer convey the appear- ance, setting, or feeling of a rural road through unspoiled wilderness... modern housing de- velopments increasingly encroach into the setting, and in places, the Canal is no longer readily visible" (Taylor 2006). Resource Feature Components The Tamiami Canal itself is approximately 161 kilometers (100 miles) long (Hooks 2011). Historically, the Tamiami canal was directly adjacent to the Tamiami Trail and there was no separation guardrail or berm (Hooks 2011). The original crossings over the waterways were wooden trestle bridges. These were all replaced with modern structures which are mostly concrete slab bridges (Hooks 2011). Furthermore, the Tamiami Canal has been dredged multiple times over the years, causing a gradual widening, as well as the berms to the north and south the Tamiami Trail (Hooks 2011). The berm to the north was created from the dredge spoil in the early to mid-1960's (Kenneally 2005). Today, the Tamiami Canal is 6 meters (20 feet) wide, although in places it widens with changes in vegetation along the cor- ridor (Hooks 2011). Metal guardrails have also been added along the length of the south side of the Tamiami Canal (Hooks 2011). The Tamiami Canal currently provides a naviga- ble waterway for ecotourism activities in the area (Hooks 2011). 56 TAS Recommendation The TAS recommends that resource feature 08CR00928, Tamiami Canal, is eligible for list- ing on the TRHP under criterion i, a property Seminole people consider important to histo- ry because of the increase in tourism money brought in by the Tamiami Canal. This in- crease in money helped lead Tribal members to economic independence from the U.S. gov- ernment. ACI's work, along with the SHPO, recommended that a portion of resource fea- ture 08CR00928, Tamiami Canal, is eligible for listing on the NRHP under criterion A, Community, Planning, and Development, for the critical role it played in the development of Florida by linking two of its major cities, Tampa and Miami, as well as for its historical associations with Barron Collier and James Jaudon. Resource feature 08CR00928 is also eli- gible under criterion C in the area of engineering for its pioneering effort in dredge -and -fill practices in order to traverse the Everglades. This technique became an adopted and re- sponsible technique that was vital to Everglades and South Florida waterway management. The portion of 08CR00927 which is eligible for listing on the NRHP stretches from the north boundary of the Collier -Seminole State Park eastward to CR-92. The TAS agrees with the above stated previous recommendations of ACI and the SHPO. 57 �` Al IIISh i Streets �h CR00928 Boundary =•-��_..-r....-... #� Reservation Boundary�_•- Figure 11. Map of Resource Feature 08CR00928. 58 Photograph 17. A dredge at work in the Tamiami Canal, Miami Region, Florida, 1921. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 18. Palms along the Tamiami Canal. Florida Memory Site. 59 Photograph 19. Barges on the Tamiami Canal, Tamiami Trail, Florida, 1920 or 1921. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 20. Seminoles in canal bordering the Tamiami Trail, Everglades, Florida, 192% Florida Memory Site. Semcmle lad. s In the Heart of IAe rlotodu Everglades .Adfi& Photograph 21. Seminole woman Nellie Tommie and her son in a wooden canoe, 1956. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 22. Seminole Indians in the heart of the Florida Everglades, 1938. Florida Memory Site. 61 Photograph 23. Seminole Indian village along Tamiami Trail in Florida, Tamiami Trail, Florida. Florida Memory Site. Photograph 24. Indian village on the Tamiami Trail,195-. Florida Memory Site. 62 Photograph 25. Landscape view taken from the Tamiami Trail, Everglades, Florida, 1952. Florida Memory Site. 63 I .;p low lot.; 4 PY 4.5 Conclusion and Recommendations The Glover Property project (THPO Project Number 2013-050) involves the construction of a governmental building, which includes utilities, water, sewer, cable, and internet (see Appendix 1 for site plan). According to Harvey Rambarath (STOF Planning and Development Assistant Director), no construction will occur around the canal and no new plants will be added; existing plants will remain in that area. The project is receiving funding from the Seminole Tribe of Florida, though it requires a compliance review pursuant to Section 106 of the NHPA by United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, investigations and a compliance review are also required pursuant to the STOF CRO (C-01-16). The Glover Property area of potential effect (APE) is rectangular in shape and measures at its greatest extent approximately 135 meters (432 feet) north to south by 61 meters (198 feet) east to west. The total area of the APE is 0.72 hectares (1.8 acres). The 2013-050 APE is located on the Tamiami Trail, Collier County, Florida, within Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 34 East. The APE is bound to the north by a vacant lot, to the east by parking lots, to the south by buildings, and to the west by the Tamiami Trail. In order to investigate the Glover Property APE, the TAS completed both background archival research and a cultural resources field survey. The background archival research was undertaken so as to identify potentially significant resources or previously conducted surveys in proximity to the project's APE. This research was used to assist in the determination of an appropriate field investigation methodology. Background research identified six sites and two resource features that are located within 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) of the APE. One resource feature, 08CR00928, Tamiami Canal, overlaps the current APE. The other resource feature, 08CR00927, US-41, is within 30 meters (98 feet) of the current APE. Both resource features are eligible for the Tribal Register of Historic Places (TRHP) and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). A review of the THPO Database also shows that there are six previously completed surveys within 1,000 meters (3,28 feetl) of the APE. None of these surveys overlap the current APE. Field investigations, which included a pedestrian survey and shovel testing, recorded no new sites. However, since 08CR00928 (Tamiami Canal) and 08CR00927 (Tamiami Trail) are within the APE or within 30 meters (98 feet) of the APE, it was necessary to assess these resource features for impacts by the current undertaking. Based on this assessment, the TAS agrees with previous recommendations that both resource features are eligible for the NRHP. Additionally, the TAS recommends that both resource features are eligible for the TRHP. STOF Cultural Resource Ordinance Recommendation Based on the investigations for the Glover Property project, the TAS recommends that re- source feature 08CR00927, Tamiami Trail, and resource feature 08CR00928, Tamiami Ca- nal, are eligible for listing on the TRHP, under criterion i, a property that the Seminole peo- ple consider important to history. Based on the proposed site plan and conversations with Harvey Rambarath (STOF Planning and Development Assistant Director), neither 08CR00927 nor 08CR00928 will be impacted by the undertaking, because no construction is occurring around the canal or road. Therefore, the TAS recommends a finding of cultural resources not adversely affected. National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Recommendation Based on the investigation of the Glover Property project, the TAS recommends, in con- currence with previous findings by the SHPO, Janus Research, Inc., and Archaeological Consulting, Inc., that resource feature 08CR00927, Tamiami Trail, and resource feature, 08CR00928, Tamiami Canal are eligible for listing on the NRHP, under criteria A, Commu- nity, Planning, and Development, and C, Engineering. Based on the proposed site plan and conversations with Harvey Rambarath (STOF Planning and Development Assistant Direc- tor), neither 08CR00927 nor 08CR00928 will be impacted by the undertaking, because no construction is occurring around the canal or road. Therefore, the TAS recommends a find- ing of historic properties not adversely affected, per Section 106 of the NHPA. The TAS finds no other issues of concern regarding cultural resources and recommends that the undertaking, as originally proposed in THPO Project Request Number 2013-050 be permitted to proceed. 67 4.6 Unanticipated Discoveries Should future activities in this APE uncover any archaeological remains, activity in the im- mediate area must be stopped until a professional archaeologist from the TAS can evaluate the discovery. In the event that human remains are found during construction or mainte- nance activities, the STOF maintains compliance with provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). If human remains, funerary objects, or sacred objects are discovered inadvertently, the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), Tribal Bioarchaeologist, and the Seminole Police Department must be notified immediately by telephone and all further activity ceased. Additionally, a reasonable effort must be made to leave the discovery in place. SURVEY LOG Ent D li-Msf only) Survey Log Sheet Surrey 0 (FMSF only) Florida Master Site file Version h.0 3119 Consult Girds to l" $error log Sheet for detailed instructions. Surrey Project Iname and protect phase) Report Title (noctly as an uN papal �iltriral Rey-: ::- Survey and Aaeeaement of ttLe Glover Property Project, Colliar ODunty Report Authors Ia. on title popes 1•. SI-mun Reyte 3, Maureen rtnhoney 2• Bran-ly ttc•rton 4. Publication Year 2019 Mu wr of Pees in Report (do not include so farms) $1 Publication IrlfOrtrletpn &ys ssoss, numbs n:sues, pubkshr said olv. For ands or diaper, dtep BGNdWL UN the style of .4AM*MAB*&*.l _..y: Hia[orlc Pre aervatio❑.1ttr^e, P.el;u,!t �fi1;.1i`_.:.P:. 1:1exidton, FL Supervisors of Fieldwork Gran d same as sutsor) comes N.aure-:n M honev Affifefion of Fleldworkers: Orpataiatron :armor. trbeuFkxrie Gty Clewlot-an Key Wordsf Phases (Dal use county name. a eornleen words Ike adios (vy, stnxtxro, 4uhey. 4actowrov, err.) 1, s —I. a,e. or rlo..e. 3, -- :.ver PrciNr ry 5• Tamlaml canal 7• _ Z rl!t - 4.ramsisms Tr4s1 e. B. Surrey Sponsors loorpornlon. seuerttarrtt umt, orpenuatlae, a plrson luttrrlp fiekworf l C—sp—,...... rbma nitn_le ;111< .[ i Organization Wldriz.Pkare;Fmail lal)o Joel. Allis H,$—y. MIF 0141 C:e+ilt—. PL Recorder of lap Stret r _,t :ty zr;T : r Date I og Sheet Conpleted Is this surrey or project a continuation of a previous project? ®No 13Yes: Pm,ous survey a,s lFNI&F or-r! (Aunlles (soNct ovary county r, which field :army was done: 4tuch addaunal sheet J necessary) 1. 1: 1 3. 5. 2. 4. a. USGS 1:24,000 Map Narnes!Year of Latest Revision lanech additional sheet 0 necessaryl t. Nu,m i ;"i Y: Lli c�1:L _ YIW ! 9P-3 4. AWu YM S. M" '. N;nm for E. Mars rim I 1 Fieldwork Dates- Start _ 11 bid 6-4-=01 Total Area Surveyed (u111111,.) _hectare _ ores Mulnber of Distinct Tracts or Areas 9uteyed 1 If Corridor (f'1 in one tot each) Wldtk meters ___ _'eet Length: _ kilernaters trdes 1114tatlbrtalla. 10.c1-16.2e1e rle.lr Moto %a#W.rh...1 Nrr.n.al5rw.r!a.4n,.tnylNIC a 111uu.i S1. t.4.lrjk-u 17iK112-MI ad. la 4e nor.F 4r nor C61174t.14411I,F.. M11743017, Ind S,NIe.MA—VflwW.aM, ae Page 2 Survey log Sheet Survey / Types of Survey ( tact at Pro• apa.). ®archaeological ®archtectural ®Asloricatfuchival Ddeowe assessment ❑mo-oling report DotherYYscribel: _ Dundietwoter Scope!Intensity lProcedures vel tests were excavated to probab111ty zones created by TliPO All shovel teats 1 .-� rig 1: acraan. Mndaratw protabiItty zonac axcavatad at_ ;Om intarvaIa- i Preliminary Ahthods Iseleci at many as apply to the pro.ect as a whalel ❑HondaArchtmsIGayaaldrg; [)traivrazasichhedmbir EYlaldo Photo ruchrws IGav SLAhJnot D-blary ptnar _election Was File promrty Beach D Lbbc lands Swiliv h;s at EEPI ana file corny search Dail udcr nta•nisl Dxrer idetcreel Dkeal xoperty or is. reemoz ❑ether hatmx no DIIDAe Dewmapar Iles Osoes maps or we ❑other lernots strsnp ❑iterativenach Dtnrtdihadsureav ❑Ssnban Insuarce maps ®seals, tarotogiaphy Atchaeologecal Methods (select as many as apply to the pt .•t as a ,Mvolei [Ghect here d NO arrhaeologr;al rrnthads were used. axisce Co'octicn. mmrolled lets what sonars sits Dxisce coaection. moo ruled ❑waur senors &hveel lost 1;4'sciun ❑portholo late& ❑hams test l,E 1len ❑suer tastt Dtrn.eiust 106,Xreen ❑conrN ❑ lln.el last mcrvt vd ❑test treawtlon IM least 102 col []ocher lleesrdoel: DYud eaaeaucn ipt 4=t ?a? col C17va cmetricr D of reststl'aty ❑rhs- r"e rarnnj; ❑-utna'omrs• �iedestna, snr,ev DS,de -:an :ana, ❑.ri.naw'n Dl(oxe ptrevirtrp ra9r IGPRI DtIDAH HlstoficallArchileciurel h0lethods Dselro as many as apply to the project as a whole) ❑!:heck here it NO Iistorioharchitecturel methods Yale used. mmMana pli ClItha lmmri Finals angFbir r-.v m. Dcormemal permts Diatrilseheld turmy axt�pant rtotw Dmtrre a� ocurnarlon peal property raccirds D:Capat W perm: ®ether lfatertal: !':cam:nevi THF' Aar -- Resource Significance Evaluated? ®yes ❑No �a�reaesaft: Count of Previously Recorded Resources Count of Newly Recorded Resources List Previously Recorded Site 101s with Silo file forma Completed lattaeh addliamol pages if neieessry) LW Newly Recorded Site ID#S lollac h additional paget it necessary) Site Forrns Used ❑0Ate File Paper Forms ®site Fib POF FornoR ❑mbd aaon morz Diaz rtooi= Qrkno.^t REQUIRED: Attach Map of Survey or Project Area Boundary Origin of Repo,& ❑91; ❑Pcbla (and: ❑Ui% ❑la.l: - D4caoai DCwnren ❑Arn:ativial DGrare Prcita S t-t'' ❑Eornptares Re.u.: GRA1 Type of Document: DArrleeoboical Sirysy Diaformil Archtecttaal &vAy DMarne Surmy DCO Tower ERAS ❑Atoatonrg Rt001t Dilaryiew Drennan Report ❑leih�Silo Estaeow Rspat ❑Srrxrura Dotaled Rapnt D.bra•r Kst. car Arch•a Per: E3Dn wAnalysis DAPS ❑MRA DTG ❑0mar: Oociament Destination: Plottablo ProTecta Ptetahllity: Iltifa nHMlnJle. alM[t+wats001a f1uaM Mele saefth l Dv or ll,ataaal Hessims!HA Ger Hlrp: 5n756imuln It 1,00tswe, f 41.1H 3�1.32160156) HUe I4,46.1101.1f At%eieefU.7e6.51M,fax 660245,6439.Ftmr silnitlgthinyilto—in 70 FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE FORM Lags t RESOURCE GROUP FORM 9fe w CRO 0 927 Field [late o-4-2013 ❑Ctngnd r' \ FLORIDA MASTER SITE BILE Verdsrr 5.0 1+19 Form Dale 8-2-2019 ®l (mddl Record,nil � r'm=9311ma(:,w3s ni f15Rany9,•�rl.W Fnrm lrr aAflnn3l : NOTE: Use this form to doninient districts, landscapes, building complexes and linear resources +.-: r � * it fT,� box below Cdtura� r. Do not use this form for Nollafal R•glatfr muftlple property subinlfslons (W$s) Naborrli Regster f9FSs ere feared aS SAe Fie man._ , - ,. ,air-d wrlh the tldredual resouxes inciiAoi unier the WS cover using ftre S4e F le manuscript number Check ONE box 9fat best dsscrib•s Ill Resource Group: ❑ Ifisloric district f d-gory "disficr) buldrys and I•R structures only ND archaedogri: sties ❑ Archaeological district iriRcetagory'dshcr) aratwologral sllesonly NObuldrngs or NR stnucllres ❑ Mixed district ategary'dsiic{) includes more than one type of cu•3rd resource (exennple archaeob9cal srks jm hulcing-d ❑ Building complex Ir R ca" usually'buldr+g(sr) multiple buildings or close spatial jW kmlonal association ❑ Designed historic landscape M category usually' dstncr or'slle) can includa muliple resources (see Nabona) --. -� : r, +1f3. Fyge ? for more detailed definition and an rrples is a parks, golf courses, campuses; resorts. etc I ❑ Rural historis landscape 1hR calegcry usually *drstrfc{ cr'sJte'j can mWe multiple resources and resources not for rrdly desrrled (see .NaAoiai RegWer Bukfir #30, Guideires to, EvaA.a* and Iba mrfinq RwalMdoric UrAArapes br more detaiei delnr,,,- all e.amples a g. farmsteads. Usti camps, limiter camps, rtWbonal ceremonial ales, efo ) ® Linear resource (W category =aIly'stnuct re7 Linear resources are a special I•Ige of s•urture or historic landscape and car• , :, • � u . ralwrrys. roods, elt R,-souce Group Neme Tarn iam 1 Tra i 1 /US -41 _ 1111,40e, Liming [OW on0yj P1(feclNerne Glover Property FWFSurlreyv National ReglsterCmegcrylpla.aealedornb Qulding4gI Ebinrdur. 619n:- 00. ❑ctrad LnrorRrSqurce- Typr.eiaptiwtim d:erel Orahmj Wad ❑others,:.,,-�oej p� 9�9��" Ownership Omnr� i .dt 9rai—mpoq ❑ e,,,i 9nvsN1111 �IINSN iY Fefr,f. 0:11 E3- .Ay t81',.L• ❑I,.;nl Elthit* Am— .,, D:..q(t ❑whri I• 91"w,mtrl r:... : ,.-I1 "I tool T w, vn.rn»e„� Address US-41/Tamiami Trail (Ay1T(Aw lwlnr1311w.e1 C-hopee/Carnestrmn It) WrentOlyLrnnl Wo-S Ono ❑t+'l.rn .n CournfyorGouniesldoed•btVtwi.) Collier Norte of Public Trwl it a, pf14)_ 1) Toxnshp 52s Range 298 Section 25 %seclon ❑PMl MM 03E ONE Irregular, name: 2) Toxnshp 525; Rangy 30E Sectiont-91-13— %section ❑tIA D3W ME 014E 33 T1rrinshp 53.9 Range 31E Section; r - - %wion ❑rbv a.w 03E DvE 1) Townsrlp 53s Range 32E $action•- • t.. u %seclon ❑NA MW ME ENE USGS76Maple) 1)Nam oC)}_IPEE US3SDate 1983 '1 Na1re BURNS :.ArE USGS [late 1903 plat, Aend, or Other fop onapt ume ,pnLvq nt,t wlh hnMpn) tW& .rn •I . 9atcr !x3 =.anti• 19.9 goer-. St.11.+. 1s19 whir M17. a.ad 1949 Landgrant Verbd Nsct bon o4 16putn et ldesrndon a„z rra reface nq reo naps ri9...ar.ae .t us-uan-.f ..7Trr.aI oee-i. e�-r�a�t.r . ML- ".a 1...- 1. s.t— at-j...a a .r wd II - -th- a tlia o.r.Lr 79r.en19•. P.n2e 6-rtI- r.clrued' r-;.mole 5J6 Ra.9e 33i J.a. E—rl�z 13-1e/i7-111, 21-22,24, Jf DHR USE ONLY OFFICIAL EVALUATION NR Lit Dale SW) - Appt•Brs w meal cntem for PR taring ❑,- G ❑ ant too Cab Ill HEEPEF-DaH..■radnllpttlp ❑.• . f-i - -•prto- ❑OrnerObteLAcn PRCalwelorEvalwtwn pa Oh d 0' Liar Ufbf 19 v21 ,1%E•15r113.' If•.aA+46001r mans 06dr fir R. 30..1 IaAel.a ll... )111. A O.r .Bldb l Sit : Br. 11, 9. Tr61—n FL JIM 4M ""Yll. Fa[ fh�.. W2tl1M IF.. 1lf Stl Wf1= .SbfAe.l...wfn..w .n. 71 Page 2 RESOURCE GROUP FORM saew CR00927 Construcwn Year 192 o ❑approximately ❑year Fisted it earlier ❑year Iisled or later ArchnectlDesigner 4 , : .artmen, _ Butder!*:J.n=.-rl Total number of intivldual resources included in this Resource Group k of contributing 41 # of noncontributing Time perrod(s) of significance tchooee s penodtrom the fist os Prpe m date ianpalsl. e.g rd954925) I 14W I k Aftermath 1917.1920 3 2, 13cvm Tlm«e 772i-*y?9 A ItarraI a Description (NaAwialRepshrSuit* rdApp 33-34 anath mppiemainary shoats dnsedad) ee supF'lamantal Sheens RESEARCH wriIODS (check all that apply) ®FMSF record search (siteslsurveys) ®ibrary research ®FL State Archivesoholo cdlection Ocity directory Opxeperty appraiser I tax records One vspaper files ®cuturai resource survey ®historic photos Qolher methods (specify) MlogFM—tF 14 RetefeH2J9 (yw. FNs8-"'7 llaua11t nbwl) I�FMt;Frt 14'.���1,Ik25v :H�?1 _lli_ Potentially eligible mdrvidudly for National Register of Rstcnc Places? Pctentially eligible as contrhufnr b a National Register district? Explanation of Evaluation Ir ared as X@0onw Regpar euoeen ftfA p- e649. r rq'—_,-it I h49tn pbuiltirg permts pSanborn rr�apx poccupenVowner interviews fiat maps pneighbor inlemew Oi'ublic Lands Sinvey (DEP) pintenor inspechon pHAR&'r-IAER record search &- ❑no [3maftme t inform Bran my" Qro Quniirawamlonnaeon Area(s) of Hsteric l Srgnficance (sea Na FanalRegwyer9sgNa 15, p 8 for eaiagcmes' a g -arthlamn- -ethnic harbw" 'aormn o planing s dwolopmmf, ate) I <]:mm•.tnit.y planning_ develop 3 5. 2 Rngtnawring 4 6 Accessible Documentation Not Filed with the Site He - nc►rdng field notes. enaerire rasa. photos. plena and cow mpmAarn docia"M Dacunerdiypa Photcgrophe Wreaiieporgactabn Sa enolaTibeaffbrAs Docrrneol dasaepeee FM ar aixeesbn A'a 2i Daurenttype Plaid notsa Witanngorgewsbn SermoleTntieBFbrda [kcunertaascnpion _ Fie oramsssionYs - - -------- Rt> order Name -- randy Barton Affixation SersrseleTifleeorFbride Rexrder Contactlnki,mabon 3L4]O Joel. e. .. n�, Cl.w.. _u ui 7::d67i993-eEi9 ail[^.5 g .W;i.-rc r:er.rsrir. (address I phone! far? *-"4 O PHOTOCOPY OF USGS 7 5' MAP WITH DISTRICT BOUNDARY CLEARLY MARKED Required © LARGE SCALE STREET, PLAT OR PARCEL MAP WITH RESOURCES MAPPED & LABELED Attachments © TABULATION OF ALL INCLUDED RESOURCES - T, �uUo- nan». 1-MSF #, contributing? YIN resource categccy, street address or other location infarmabon if no address © PHOTOS OF GENERAL STREETSCAPE OR VIEWS (Optional: aerial photos, views of typical resources) When submthng images they must be included in digital AND hard copy formal (pan paper graysci s accsoAia) Dgital images must be at least 16M x 12DO Pixels. 24-bit color, Ipeg or hf1 72 Par t RFS01, RC GROUP FORM stem t.'RO 0 928 FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE FeldDa;e S - 22 - 2013 OCagirtel Form Dale a- - 2 019 IN, pdale Verslim 5.9 3/19 Rbcotderft CMaul Me 1; uidF M Z11e Nrsau�re rmrp Fenn Mr aMUany lndru Q1p75 NOTE. Use this form to document districts, landscapes, building complexes and linear resources us described in he box below Cullura reTxirces contnbuing to the Resource Group show also oe documemed mdrwdualy at to Site Fie Do not use this form for National Register multiple property subldssions (MPSs) National Register WSs are freated as Sde File manuscripts and are assocated with the lndrr-AA resources Irrcluded under the IVPS cover using the Sile Fie manuscript number Cheek ONE box that best descrlbes the Resource Oroup ❑ tiistoric district (f•Ftcalegory"dstrcr) buildings and NR structures only NO archaeological sites ❑ Archaeological district (r1R calegory'dstrrrl archaeological sites only M) buildings or NR structures ❑ Mixed district J IP calegory'dislncl'J includes more than one type ofcultural resarCe (example archaeologra sites and buldr►]sl ❑ Building complex irR category usually'burtdng(sr) muitiplebuildings in dose spafeel MIknotional association ❑ Designed historic landscape l)lR categoryusualy'dstncr or'srte) can include multiple resources (see NatAonal Peg,tster f :.' - =' page 2 for more detailed definition and exarrples e g parks, golf douses, campuses, resorts, etc.) ❑ Rural historic landscape VP category usualy'dslncr or'ste) can mklde mulliple resources and resources not formally desr*d (see National,Regoter &Ab A i130, GudaAw for Evaluatvlg and Dxumentog RuraJNLstonc Landscapes br more detailed de"im and exerri les e g fam steads, fish camps, lumbercanps, traditional ceremorral sites, etc) ® Liam resource it'R category isudty'slnrture I Linear resources ore especial type of shrIure a hislonc l&Y=ape arxt cart include canals, railways. reads, etc Resource Grail Narrle T-1-1 Canal M Mille Listing (Df R orly) Prolec•tName olc per Property FAC;:SurwyN National Register Category 1piisz*cMdro9w Milli go) Ostnictini ■detncl Ml-, Mitiled i'��*:••ri Lrn'ar Resource Type to voicitlel E canal Oraitway goad E7olher (describe) OWT-erhip C�rvde•i:Hil E7pt?al icaprdll I,pr Wa rdrdrul El r lr-ncoq•dr Q'ly 13minty Enialr [36 r,l EYW,i Am—i4n Q .-.r 0w4r•:nr LOCATION r r aer tsear1�1a11a ,ilea Numoer Nodirr, 8trMU;trr+ �7nNTe.r 9ih.Crrndiv� Address US-41/TaAmia ni Trail Cdylrownlrtrm3mlbs) 0chopee/carneetown In Current0IyLinis7 Ayes Oro Qur*now? County or Colnkes (do not alorewme) Collier Name of Public Tract leg red) r) Townshp S29 Range 29E Section A %section ONMr OSW ME ONE Irregular -name: 2) Tcrwnshp 52S Range 30E Section'. a. ts» %section DM OSW ME ONE 3i Townshp 535 Range 31E Section'- "" " //4 section DIN OSW ME ONJE a) Townshp 53S Range 32E Sechon' %section ❑ m ❑sw ME ❑NE USG�3 7 5' Map(s) 1I Name OC'HCPEE UStS Date 1983 2)Name BURNS LAKE LISGSDate 1993 Plat, Aerial, or Other Vap finep4name, nopnntmor.:ewei lucairinl crow mist' G.K r ni crap taa', wnroe 6"Lza ]-ai. ►trey Mile Ilene tea) Verbal Descri�tlon of 6arTdenesloeecnplon ores' not rapier• rpere0 m.p)_ SR 90/US-41./Tamiami Tra11 post 33.604 to lade post 1e.151 Township, Range. Section Continued Township 53S, Range 33/342. Secclone 13-10/17-19. 21-22,26, 36 IW Lsl Dale I St+0 - Mpoon to morel cnlena for hR Wing Oyr6 Ebro QiroidreMrnl info Del* KEEPER -Defermriedebgibu Elv% )]io ar.eaa�ar.- Dile E]OamerObjection to (>IenaforE,-aluabon ❑a Qb a dl iaee P!a&via'N?. <ti 15 p 21 HFKE06MS. 0010 MQ016 TJ.h.—FL2231124M AY +A46 001. F A C IE 1.213.i 116 : 12r. iMal� l Em/ Seer le f;Jo. a ,Aria. Bun 73 Page 2 RESOURCE GROUP FORM Ste* CROO928 Cons3ructron Year 1928 ®approximately Elleartisled or earlier Dyearlisted orlater Archilect esigner -ar- 1. L,elaltmen_;'FLa'1 Bulder ::known Total number of rrvdvidud resources includedin this Resource Gmup: k of contributing 1 B ar rlon-conftuting 19 Time period(s) of eigrolieenCe (droop a pared hors ur lid or two in daft rarrge(o), o.g r11115-I' S) -- t nth C Ali-1-_nn 3 2. 4 Narrative Description [NdWWReoanr.S.*6n t6App 33-34 mtb(he,mWnantery d+ar9irow d) Sora 3upplasncntal .Zheer. ®FMSF record search (sitestsurveys) ®ibrary research ®FL State Archiveslphoto collection ❑city diroctory Clph appraiser! tax records ❑newspaper fies ®cutural resource survey ®historic photos pother methods (specify) Bihltograptac References (9. FN F Mrs.sc•4toifi*� phuldirg permits OSanborn maps ❑occupanbkomer irxenaew fiat maps ❑neighbor mternew ❑Public Lands Survey (DEP} ❑]nlerlor inspection pHABSIHAER record search bfenfidy urligitle individually for National Register of Historic Races? ®,es pro 0—mckdhiloaaratron rateritre/y eligitle as contributor to a National Register district? ®rts One Qwalfia"aillimu n 5#anahon of Eyeluation i pnad ore Mi6bmrRagadwBubbr 16A p. 4840. Aftom ]anger atirmd, ]naiad on sainon la drat) S— Supplemental .heete Area($) Of Hstoncel Slgnllleance tea meow* Rtpvkr lavAiOn 15. p e ra uappara. e g 'amliftewa' 'eprrac heritage' 'oamnunoy planng b dr olopnerd'. ste I f. c:,.>mmun1t.y planning r: 3evalmt;'m 3 5. 2, Ens !rent in4 4 6 ACcessitie Documentation Not Filed w1h the Site Fie - nodding Sold note& analysis rates pr ML plan andodw enpodaa docurorto DauneM rip, . f :4:.' : 11 11', a Maahnsng orgareamin Sarinde 7fte al l'knda 1 j Owtrrierd descnphon File or aecomon Ns 2 Oocrmenl tmo F 1 -. ! 1 rl t s<- Dxr art do:cnphm Recorder Name Fran td7rtan ROcCYdef Contact Information 30290 a -le Billie hw, (addrest t phone 1 lax / p+noiO MasYatro+9 orpa•i¢aten Sarrdnda Tree of Fbida rTe or:ccessan N: Affiliation Serns�eio Tribe at Flonde_^ ....._...� F_ __44i, :- Sec. ,.. ._>> ...__ _ F- L•re:.di=•-:�•:ne:a+tir.te c�:a. O PHOTOCOPY OF USGS 7.5' MAP WITH DISTRICT BOUNDARY CLEARLY NARKED Required © LARGE SCALE STREET, PLAT OR PARCEL MAP WITH RESOURCES MAPPED 8 LABELED Attachments © TABULATION OF ALL INCLUDED RESOURCES • r-ace name. FMSF 0, conr�,long) WN resource category street address or other location information A no address ® PHOTOS OF GENERAL STREETSCAPE OR VIEWS (optional: aerial photos, views of typical resmmes) When submitting images, they must be incl uded in digital AND hard copy formal Ipiar paver grrlua4 scc.w+re Dtgrtal images must be at Ieast 1600 x 1200 pixels, 24-W color, )peg or tiff 74 ADDENDUM 1: Proposed Site Plan 75 REFERENCES CITED Advasio, J.M., and Jake Page 2002 The FirstAmericans: In Pursuit of Archaeology's Greatestystey. Random House, New York. Almy, Marion, Lee Hutchinson, and Kim Hinder 2001 A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey State Road 50 PD&E Study Lake and Orange Counties, Florida. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Florida Department of Transportation, District Five by Archaeological Consultants, Inc. Copies available from Bureau of Archaeological Research, Tallahassee, Florida. Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum Website. n.d. A Timeline for Survival: 500 Years of Seminole History. https:// www.semtribe.com/STOF/history/timeline. Accessed August 20, 2019. Austin, Robert 2005 A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Proposed Oakland Development Properly, Orange County, Florida. Manuscript on file, Florida Division of Historic Resources, Bureau of Archaeological Research, Tallahassee. Bowers, Marty and Stephen Bridenstine 2017 "Bending and Not Breaking": Seminole History and the Tribal Historic Preservation Office, the Miccosukee Perspective. In We Come for Good: Archaeology and Tribal Historic Preservation at the Seminole Tribe of Florida, edited by Paul N. Backhouse, Brent R. Weisman, and Mary Beth Rosebrough, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Bullen, Ripley 1975 A Guide to the Identification of Florida Pr jectile Points. Kendall Books, Gainesville, Florida. Bullen, Ripley P., and Laurence E. Beilman 1973 The Nalcrest Site, Lake Weohyakapka, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 26:1-22. Burnett, G.M. 1988 Florida's Past, Volume 2: People and Events that Shaped the State. Pineapple Press: Sarasota, Florida. 76 Butler, David 2008 The Blueberry Site Phase I Excavation: A Case Study in Goal Oriented Public Archaeology. Report prepared for Anne Reynolds and Reynolds Fruit Company, Inc., by Earthmovers Archaeological Consultants, LLC. Copies available from Bureau of Archaeological Research, Tallahassee, Florida. Chance, Marsha 1988 The Phase I Archaeological Assessment of a Florida Gas Transmission Company Proposed Corridor Expansion Project. Report prepared for Florida Gas Transmission Company. On file, Seminole Tribe of Florida -Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Clewiston, Florida. Covington, James W. 1993 The Seminoles of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Dunbar, James S., and C. Andrew Hemmings 2004 Florida Paleo-Indian Points and Knives. In New Perspectives on the First Americans, edited by Bradley Lepper and Robson Bonnichsea. Denham, James M. 1994 The Florida Cracker Before the Civil Wat as Seen Through Traveler's Ac- counts. The Florida Historical Quarterly LXXII:453-468. Densmore, Frances 1956 Recording for the Bureau of Music, Smithsonian Institution, Bulletin No. 161, Washington DC. Ellis, Gary 2016 Personal Communication with THPO Tribal Archaeologist Maureen Ma- honey. Florida Memory Site n.d. Florida Memory Site. State Archives of Florida. Accessed August 1 and 2, 2019. Frank, Andrew 2014 Creating a Seminole Enemy: Ethnic and Racial Diversity in the Conquest of Florida. FIU Law Review, 9(2). Gaby, Donald C. 1993 The Miami River and its Tributaries. The Historical Association of South Florida: Miami. 77 Gallagher, Peter B. 2013 Blazing a Trail Through Swamps and Everglades. The Seminole Tribune. July 22, 2013. http://seminoletribune.org/blazing-a-trail-through-swamps-and- everglades/. Accessed August 1, 2019 Garbarino, Merwyn S. 1972 Brighton: A Changing Seminole Community. Hold, Rinehart and Winston Inc., New York, NY. Goodyear, Albert C., Sam B. Upchurch, Mark J. Brooks, and Nancy N. Goodyear 1983 Paleo-Indian Manifestations in the Tampa Bay Region, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist36 (1-2):40-66. Gopher, Lorene 2012 Personal Communication with THPO Tribal Archaeologist Maureen Ma- honey. Griffin, John W. 2002 Archaeology of the Eveglades.Edited by Jerald T. Milanich and James T. Miller. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida. History Miami. n.d. http://everglades.fiu.edu/reclaim/bios/jaudon.htm Accessed August 1, 2019. Hooks, Kisa 2011 US 41 Tamiami Trail Bridge Guardrail Retrofit and Shoulder Improvements. Archaeological Consultants, Inc.: Sarasota, Florida. Hudson, Charles. 1976 Southeastern Indians. University of Knoxville, Tennessee. Janus Research 2003 Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of Florida's Turnpike Mainline PD&E Study: From US 192 to SA 50 (Clermont), Orange and Osceola Counties. Report prepared for Florida Department of Transportation Turnpike Enterprise by Janus Research. Copies available from Bureau of Archaeological Research, Tallahassee, Florida. Jaudon, James Franklin 1924 Letter to the Editor of the Miami Daily News and Metropolis. July 14, 1924. James Franklin Jaudon Papers, Box 11, Folder 6. On file at the Historical Museum of Southern Florida, Miami. 78 Johns, Willie and Stephen Bridenstine 2017 "When is Enough, Enough?": Willie Johns on Seminole History and the Tribal Historic Preservation Office, the Creek Perspective. In We Come for Good: Archaeology and Tribal Historic Preservation at the Seminole Tribe of Florida, edited by Paul N. Backhouse, Brent R. Weisman, and Mary Beth Rosebrough, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Johnston, Sidney n.d. Florida's Historic Roads and Trails: NRHP. Multiple Property Document Form. Deland: Bland & Associates, Inc. Jones, Martha 2012 Personal Communication with THPO Tribal Archaeologist Maureen Mahoney. Kersey Jr., Harry A. 1935 Pelts, Plumes, and Hides: White Traders among the Seminole Indians 1870- 1930. University Press of Florida: Gainesville. 1996 An Assumption of Sovereignty: Social and Political Transformation among the Florida Seminoles 1953-1979. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska. Kenneally, Michael 2005 CRAS of US-41 from Collier Boulevard to San Marco Drive. Janus Research, Inc.: Tampa, Florida. Klein, Rebecca, Christopher Rayle, Martin Dickinson and Lucy Wayne 2006 Cultural Resource Assessment, Hull Island, Orange County, Florida. Report prepared for Land Water Consulting, Inc., by Southarc, Inc. Copies available from Bureau of Archaeological Research, Tallahassee, Florida. MacCauley, Clay 1887 The Seminole Indians of Florida. Smithsonian Institution -Bureau of Ethnology. Dodo Press. Mahon, John K. 1967 History of the Second Seminole Wlar 1835-1842. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida. McCudden, Anne C., Billy L. Cypress, W.S. Steele, and Rick Trnka 2004 Brighton Seminole Indian Reservation Jones Loop Road Improvements, Glades County, Florida. Report Prepared by the Seminole Tribe of Florida, Tribal Historic Preservation Office. On file, Seminole Tribe of Florida -Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Clewiston, Florida. 79 McReynolds, Edwin 1957 Seminoles. University of Oklahoma Press. McVoy, Christopher W., Winifred Park Said, Jaynatha Obeysekera, Joel A. Van Arman, and Thomas W. Dreschel 2011 Landscapes and Hydrology of the Predrainage Everglades. University Press of Florida: Gainesville, Florida. Milanich, Jerald T., and Charles Fairbanks 1980 Florida Archaeology. Academic Press, New York. Milanich, Jerald T. 1994 Archaeology of Pre -Columbian Florida. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida. 1995 Florida Indians and the Invasion from Europe. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida. 1998 Florida's Indians from Ancient Times to the Present. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Miller, Susan A. 2003 Coacoochee's bones: a Seminole Saga. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. Missall, John, and Mary Lou Missall 2004 The Seminole Wlars. America's Longest Indian Conflict. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida. National Geographic. 2009 Everglades National Park. November 5, 2009. www.nationalgeographic.com. Accessed August 26, 2019. National Park Service. 2018 Big Cypress. September 26, 2018. www.nps.gov. Accessed August 28, 2019. National Parks Conservation Association. n.d. Find a Park. Www.npca.org. Accessed August 28, 2019. W Parker, Garald G. 1984 Hydrology of the Predrainage System of the Everglades in Southern Florida. In Environments of South Florida: Present and Past II, edited by P J. Gleason, pp.28-37. Miami Geological Society Coral Gables. Porter, Kenneth Wiggins 1996 The Black Seminoles. History of a Freedom -Seeking People. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Sassaman, Kenneth E. 1993 Early Pottery in the Southeast- Tradition and Innovation in Cooking Technology. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Spoehr, Alexander 1941 Camp, Clan, and Kin among the Cow Creek Seminole of Florida. Field Museum of Natural History Anthropological Series 22(1):1-27. Smith, G.C. 2011 "You Just Can't Live Without It": Ethnographic Study and Evaluation of Traditional Cultural Properties of the Modern Gladesmen Culture. Compre- hensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Southern Florida. New South Associ- ates: St. Augustine, Florida. Stanford, Dennis, and Bruce Bradley 2004 The North Atlantic Ice -Edge Corridor: A Possible Palaeolithic Route to the New World. World Archaeology, 36(4): 459-478. Ste. Claire, Dana 1990 The Archaic in East Florida: Archaeological Evidence for Early Coastal Adaptations. Florida Anthropologist 43, pp 189-197. Steele, W.S. 1997 Archaeological and Historical Perspectives of the Brighton Indian Reservation. Paper presented at Florida Anthropological Society Meeting. Steele, W.S., and Robert S. Carr 1995 An Archaeological Survey of Brighton Seminole Reservation, Glades County, Florida. AHC Technical Report #116. Report prepared for the Seminole Tribe of Florida, by the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc., Miami, Florida. Steiner, Mary C. et al. 1995 Differential Burning, Recrystallization, and Fragmentation of Archaeological Bone. Journal ofArchaeological Science, 22: pp 223-237. 81 Sturtevant, William C. and Jessica R. Cattelino 2004 Florida Seminole and Miccosukee. In Handbook of North American Indi- ans, vol. 14, Southeast. Raymond D. Fogelson, vol., ed. Pp. 429-449. Wash- ington: Smithsonian Institution. Taylor, Rob 2006 CRAS of US 41 from Collier Boulevard to San Marco Drive. Janus Re- search: Tampa, Florida. Thompson, Victor D., William H. Marquardt, Alexander Cherkinsky, Amanda D. Roberts Thompson, Karen J. Walker, Lee A. Newsom, Michael Savarese 2016 From Shell Midden to Midden-Mound: The Geoarchaeology of Mound Key, an Anthropogenic Island in Southwest Florida, USA. Plos One 11(4). United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2013 Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html, accessed May 17, 2013. Walker, Billy 2019 Oral History with Justin Giles, Jack Chalfant, Shawn Keyte, and Brandy Norton. Recording on File with the Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum, Clewiston, Florida. Weisman, Brent 1989 Like Beads on a String. A Cultural History of Seminole Indians in Northern Peninsular Florida. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 1999 Unconquered People. Florida's Seminole and Miccosukee Indians. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 2000a Archaeological Perspectives on Florida Seminole Ethnogenesis. In Indians of the Greater Southeast.- Historical Archaeology and Ethnohistory, edited by Bonnie G. McEwan, pp. 299-317. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 2000b The Origins of the Seminole Plantation System and its Role in Florida's Colonial Economy. In Colonial Plantations and Economy of Florida, edited by Jane Landers. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 2014 The Background and Continued Cultural and Historical Importance of the Seminole Wars in Florida. FIU Law Review, 9(2). 82 West, Patsy 1998 The Enduring Seminoles: From Alligator Wrestling to Ecotourism. Univer- sity Press of Florida: Gainesville, Florida. Wickman, Patricia 1999 The Tree that Bends: Discourse, Power, and the Survival of the Maskoki People. University of Alabama Press, Birmingham, Alabama. Widmer, Randolph J. 1988 The Evolution of the Calusa. A Non Agricultural Chiefdom of the Soutbwest Florida Coast. University of Alabama Press, Tusculoosa, Alabama. Worth, John E. 2013 Pineland during the Spanish Period. In The Archaeology of Pineland: A Coastal Southwest Florida Site Complex, A.D. 50-1710, edited by William H. Marquardt and Karen J. Walker. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Wright, J. Leitch Jr. 1986 Creeks and Seminoles: The Destruction and Regeneration of the Musco- gulge People. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska. 83 Kimley>Morn December 3, 2020 Alberto Herrera Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 355 Alhambra Circle, Suite 1400 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Re: Seminole Trail Government Center 57257 Tamiami Trail East Ochopee, FL 34141 To whom it may concern: The existing site is located at 57257 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, FL 34141. The applicant is proposing to add a government center with underground ADS chambers as storage. To analyze the proposed site conditions for compliance with the SFWMD requirement to treat the first inch of runoff or 2.5 inches times the percentage of impervious area, the following parameters were inputted into stage storage calculations: Disturbed Area: 1.84f Acres Pervious Area = 1.08f Acres Impervious Area = 0.76t Acres October High Water Table: 6.7' NAVD IOYear-1Day Rainfall Depth = 6.00" 25Year-3Day Rainfall Depth=11.00" 100Year-3Day Rainfall Depth=14.00" Manufacturer's Specifications= See attached Based on the assumptions above and stage storage calculations attached, we are handling quality with .154 ac-ft of volume in the ADS chambers and staging our roads, berm, and FFE above the stage elevations for these storm events. We have also proposed a discharge weir into the canal to support any additional runoff. Supporting documentation is attached. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any further questions or need additional information, please contact our office at (305) 535-7742 or contact Alberto Herrera via email at alberto.herrera@kmley-hom.com Very truly yours, Ov��udunenner�d�r KIMLEY-HORN AN�% QARE*.-i, a` . ••• "•° �o voXC,° o 0(,V 57 0� Alberto Herrera i�.M STATE Off o C Senior Project M9n ©� PE License # 5935 �s ;�< O � °�� NAL g�nr7R911Ei100, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PER TITLE SEARCH REPORT) SHEET I ❑F TRACTS 118 AND 119 OF SECTION 36. TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, TITLE SEARCH REPORT TABLE FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 WITH THE CASTLE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SEARCH EFFECTIVE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY R/W LINE OF U.S. HWY 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF 4545.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE APRIL 1, P019 AT I1i00 PM CONTINUE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY R/W UNE OF U.S. 41 FOR A DISTANCE OF INSTRUNEN RECORDING AFFECT 200 FEET, TO A PCINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN NORTHEASTERLY FOR A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN SOUTHEASTERLY T TYPE ➢ESCRIPTION DATA S PLUTTE➢ FOR A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90' RUN O.R.B. LEGAL SOUTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 40C FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. FOUND 5/8' IRON ROD & CAP FOUND 5/9' IRON ROD &CAP DEED WARRANTY 4776, YES ➢ESC. LEI20D.DD' LB# 69 DEED PG.1255, SHOWN �� qA +Qr ++QATW1{ &B. D.CA. D1IL, aAs. HI NERAL OR COVERS NOEN� AGREEMENT EITHER PG.1 6, YES RE TW16 + I RESERVATION B.C.R. SITE TRACT m � _ + WETLAND AS NARKED BY + a iTWiS La I K.SLILY IMLEY-HORN & Assoc., INC. z DATED R018 a F• TWA 4, ' TWS ASONAL HIGF; Y C TER MARK 42 +TAB TW7r 7� +fi'S' , TWI. IB' + !I T1J9 ++ * w o 5.4'X7A' cmi WATER PUMP {CD TW6 m -15' i HOUSE +TWIT ,i�IG T TW11 12' 8 m �ONCRETE 10r-15' F R? m Dunn 5/01 M IRDN ROD & CAP IWATER'S LB#6680 EDGE 26' MIRTH W4} rTW3 BANiI #+ n1 + 1 l p E.9'+t Z.S' �•+ 1�+ + 4¢v z =qC6 WSW w el w TENCE METAL P11 TWI �a TRACT 119•-� _ GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TW 20 0b' 6' CHAIN LINK+9 " FENCE'°' 2_1' 56.3' m e.R•.� if + s. CONCRETE I 8 � � Tll2i B +rTW23 + +a•+ S'6++g,y SRAVA ROAD Q, . { ELECTRIC { POST { 8'- TOP Of HANK FOUND 5/8' R©N ROD & CAP TW LB#6680 r10, 26' NCRTHi 6TW26 NTW25 P.O.B. - + TW27 +'�° I'i"+ °� 'Z +°�2DD,DD'+� ABBREVIATIONS; PALM TREE _ R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE HEIGHT IN FEET ~+ HWY HIGHWAY SYMBOL LEGEND: I P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT -C>- POWER POLE ' P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING CBS CONCRETE BLOCK F ANCHOR STRUCTURE F.FL.EL. FINISHED FLOOR PALM TREE ELEVATION rL CENTERLINE STRANGLER FIG 1 TW DELINEATION FLAGS SHW SEASONAL HIGH 10"--1 TREE WATER LOCATION � WETLANDS ADDRESS: !DELINEATION 57257 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST CANOPY DIAMETE=R IN FEET SURVEYOR'S NOTES' TRUNK ➢IAMETER IN INCHES SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS NOT ABSTRACTED BY THIS FIRM FOR EASEMENTS, RIGHT -OF -WRY, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD, AND OWNERSHIP WAS NOT TW21DETERMINED. Q9' SCALE OF SOME FEATURES MAY BE EXAGGERATED FOR CLARITY. BURIED FOUNDATIONS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN. ELEVATION NOTE: ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERIGAN VERTICAL DATUM OF IS88 IN AVD88}, SHOWN TH US: IO AND ARE BASED ON NGS PCINT J 248, 61SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BECHMARK DISK SET IN TOP OF CONCRETE o MONUMENT AND STAMPED J 248 1965 LOCATED ABOUT C5 14.25 MILES EAST ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 41 FROM THE It JUNCTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 94 THE CADE-COLLIER COUNTY LINE, 0.2 MILE NORTHWEST OF HIGHWAY BRIDGE NO. 117, 144 FEET SOUTHEAST OF A DRIVE LEDING NORTHEAST ACROSS THE TAMIAMI CANAL, 24.5 FEET NORTHEAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE HIGHWAY, 7 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE SOUTHWEST EDGE OF THE CANAL, 1.5 FEET SOUTHEAST OF A METAL WITNESS POST, ABOUT LEVEL WITH THE HIGHWAY AND SET IN THE TOP OF A CONCRETE POST PROJECTING 0.3 FOOT. ELEVATION - 8.53' (NAVD88) SURVEY CERTIFICATION: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP DR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS CINTLY ESTA13USHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7a, 7h. AND 8 ON TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON JULY 27th, 2019. a Poe RAIL 9�-TAMIAMI TR ILUARD RAIL AS rs� NCFIM WA R'Ss F4 r{ PAVEMENT.?r `U•S. HWY 41) -SET 60D NAIL EDGE +q LL,=7`i SKETCH OF BOUNDARY & TOP GRAPHIC SURVEY CERTIFIED TO, S.T.O.F. HOUDIIN(S6 LTD.. A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SEMINOLE TRIBE OF F'LORIDE TAMIAh11 GOVERNMENT CENTER, 57257 US-41 OCHOPEE, FL. (PARCEL NUMBER: 0123868000O) ADD SEASONAL LFMFR 9TITLE G RELIF /27/'ADD �ACPTABLE RESIONMR I� DRAWN BY, LPICHECKED BY- MR MR \PReJECTS\ZnID\la-000aD - 57257 TAHLMd TRAIL EAST\19- N& MILLER�� LEGG South Flonda Office: 5747 N. Andrews Way Ft. Lauderdale, Florida • =09-2364 954A3&-7000 • Fax:954-43&-9%4 www.millerlepg.mm SOUTHEAST CORNER (If SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP OUTH ANGE 34 EAST EAST LINE OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP SOUTH E RANGE 34 EAST NORTHEASTERLY I��-OF- UF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) GRAPHIC SCALE / I IN FEET I I 1 INCH = 40 FEET J 1. HEAEBY CERTIFY THAT TH IVEr NESTS STANDARDS CIF 07TCF PRAAS seFLORIDA T FeRTM BY TNF DFFARTNFNT OF AIRICULTUME AND CONSUMER SERVICES OF PROFEMENAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER SJ-17, FLORIDA ADHINISTRATIVE OWE PIRSOANT 70 SEDTION 472AEL FLCRDA STAKES• DATED THIS 29Sh DAT OF JIl1E 2LL6 AA 171v'_ 70� P L -- K TIN P. REISSI PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE Of FLORIDA REOISTRATTON 10" NOT VALID WITHOUT TIE SIGNATURE AND THE OR RAISE➢ SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICINSED SURVEYOR AN