The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/28/2022 Item #17B (Ordinance - Ord. Amending Ord. 2004-41 for AmeriSite CB MPUD PL20210001103)06/28/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve Ordinance number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as the AmeriSite CB MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 303 multifamily dwelling units of which 68 units will qualify as affordable housing, up to 70,000 square feet of commercial shopping center uses, and up to 85,000 square feet of mini -warehouse self -storage uses; and truck leasing and gas station uses shall not be allowed. The subject property is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1000 feet north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 18.95E acres; providing for repeal of Resolution No. 14-152, a conditional use for indoor self -storage and Ordinance No. 14-28, a rezone to General Commercial (C-4); and by providing an effective date. (This is a companion item to Accela# 22380) [PL20210001103] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staffs findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1000 feet north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 18.95+/- acres. The petitioner is requesting that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) consider an application to rezone property from the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as Amerisite CB MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 303 multi- family dwelling units of which 68 units will qualify as affordable housing, up to 70,000 square feet of commercial shopping center uses, and up to 85,000 square feet of mini -warehouse self -storage uses; and truck leasing and gas station uses shall not be allowed. The subject property is comprised of three parcels and is owned by Amerisite LLC. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Rezone (PUDZ) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject +18.95-acre site is designated Urban, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict (MUAC #7 - Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard) and is also within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map; and zoned C-4 (General Commercial) with use limitations (Ord. No. 2014-28). The MUAC Packet Pg. 1815 06/28/2022 allows the full array of commercial uses (C-1 thru C-5), and the URF allows an eligible base density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre (28 dwelling units) and a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre (48 dwelling units) with the acquisition and redemption of Transfer of Development Rights Credits. The applicant is requesting approval of up to 303 multi -family (apartment or owner -occupied) dwelling units (16 DU/A). Additionally, the applicant is requesting to expand the commercial uses currently allowed on the Amerisite parcels to include gasoline service station (prohibited by Ord. No. 2014-28) and truck rental with up to 40 trucks. The proposed density is inconsistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The two commercial uses noted above are consistent with uses allowed in the Mixed -Use Activity Center. However, the Board of County Commissioners accepted the East Naples Community Development Plan (ENCDP) in October 2020, which identifies gasoline service station use and outdoor storage uses (i.e., 40 trucks) as undesirable uses. There is a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) petition, PL20210001104, that provides for the requested density. Therefore, the MPUD may only be found consistent with the GMP if the GMPA is approved and becomes effective. Regarding the ENCDP, the CCPC and BCC may determine the appropriateness of the requested uses which are not consistent with the vision expressed in that Plan. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's November 27, 2021, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. d. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the PUD provided with the proposed rezoning the applicant is requesting a maximum of 303 multi -family residential dwelling units, 70,000 square feet of gross commercial floor Packet Pg. 1816 06/28/2022 area, 85,000 square feet of mini -warehouse and 40 rental trucks.[Note the rental truck use has been removed] The TIS provided indicated a current zoning development scenario that is based on the approved plans for "Amerimed Center", dated March of 2006. The Amerimed Center consisted of 189,500 square feet of Commercial C-4 uses. Staff evaluated the TIS and agrees that this scenario present a reasonable trip count based on existing zoning designation. The proposed new mixed -use development represents a potential (161) reduction in the number of PM peak hour trips. Specifically, the TIS indicates that the proposed development will generate approximately +/-493 two-way PM peak hour net trips on the adjacent road network. According to the current 2021 AUIR, Collier Boulevard (CR 951) from Davis Boulevard to Rattlesnake Hammock Road has a current service volume of 3,000 and a remaining capacity of approximately 417 north bound trips and is currently operating at LOS "D". There is a projected trip bank expected deficiency in 2031(1). Rattlesnake Hammock Road from Collier Boulevard to Santa Barbara Boulevard has a current service volume of 2,900 and a remaining capacity of approximately 1,949 west bound trips and is currently operating at a LOS `B". 1. Staff notes that Collier Boulevard from Davis to Green Boulevard are in the 5-year work program as funded design -build improvements which include improvements to the I-75 interchange and the 6 expansion of the remaining 4-lane portion of Collier Boulevard. It is anticipated that these improvements will improve the capacity of Collier Boulevard noted above and adjacent to the proposed development. Based on the information in the TIS provided with this petition the subject links noted above have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, Transportation planning staff finds the petition in compliance with the GMP and recommends approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (COME). The project site consists of .40 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.40 acres of preservation will be provided either through on -site preservation of the native vegetation or through an off -site mitigation payment. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the GMP, unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrent with the PUD and the uses and intensities align. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL20210001103 on June 2, 2022, and by a vote of 6 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with required changes to the PUD as explained below. The CCPC approval was unanimous. There was some opposition to the self -storage use (SIC 4225); however, the use was approved via Resolution 14-152 in 2014. As such, this petition will be placed on Summary Agenda. The required changes and additions to be added to the PUD by the CCPC include: Exhibit A - List of Permitted Uses: • Removal of the uses - Use #37 (Gasoline service stations - SIC 5541), Use #86 (Truck rental and leasing - SIC 7513), Use #65 (Outdoor advertising services - SIC 7312) • Deleting the following SIC Codes - 5499, 8099, 8069, 8059, and 5998 • Adding the following language "Adult oriented sales and rentals prohibited" Exhibit C - Site Plan: • Add an illustration "Potential interconnection to the north if [Amerisite MPUD] developed as commercial" Packet Pg. 1817 06/28/2022 Exhibit F - List of Developer Commitments: • 34 units at or below 100% the AMI • 34 units at or below 80% the AMI • The restriction on the affordable units shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30) years from the date of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy • 40% of the total 303 will be one bedroom • The first 18 units above the base density of twenty-eight (28) units must be through the acquisition and redemption of Transfer of Development Credits • The restriction on the affordable units shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30) years from the date of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy • As part of the annual PUD monitoring report the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units. (Typical commitment for monitoring the AH units.) The changes were accepted by staff, and these revisions were added to the Ordinance. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site -specific rezone to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Zoning District. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for MPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed MPUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with MPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified Packet Pg. 1818 06/28/2022 as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed MPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested MPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed MPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.Il], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the MPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate Packet Pg. 1819 06/28/2022 to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. ( ) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant's request to rezone to the MPUD zoning district; subject to approval of the companion GMPA. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report - AmeriSite CB MPUD (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Revised Ordinance 6-7-22 (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment B - Application -Backup Materials (PDF) 4. Attachment C - Hearing Advertising Sign (PDF) 5. legal ad - agenda IDs 22380 & 21816 (PDF) Packet Pg. 1820 06/28/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.B Doc ID: 21816 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve Ordinance number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as the AmeriSite CB MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 303 multifamily dwelling units of which 68 units will qualify as affordable housing, up to 70,000 square feet of commercial shopping center uses, and up to 85,000 square feet of mini -warehouse self -storage uses; and truck leasing and gas station uses shall not be allowed. The subject property is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1000 feet north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 18.95f acres; providing for repeal of Resolution No. 14-152, a conditional use for indoor self storage and Ordinance No. 14-28, a rezone to General Commercial (C-4); and by providing an effective date. (This is a companion item to Accela# 22380) [PL20210001103] Meeting Date: 06/28/2022 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 06/08/2022 9:22 AM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 06/08/2022 9:22 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Growth Management Department Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Diane Lynch Growth Management Department Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Mike Bosi Transportation James C French Growth Management Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Office of Management and Budget Laura Wells Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 06/09/2022 10:49 AM Completed 06/09/2022 5:12 PM Completed 06/10/2022 7:37 AM Skipped 06/10/2022 7:38 AM Completed 06/12/2022 2:23 PM Completed 06/15/2022 9:08 AM Completed 06/15/2022 9:14 AM Completed 06/15/2022 2:54 PM Completed 06/17/2022 1:24 PM Packet Pg. 1821 17.B 06/28/2022 County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 06/21/2022 4:31 PM 06/28/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1822 17.B.1 Coifie_ r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 2, 2022 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20210001103; AMERISITE CB MPUD COMPANION ITEM: PL20210001104; MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER #7 (GMPA) OWNER/AGENTS: Owner/Applicant: Peter Sulick, MGRM Amerisite, LLC 1801 Gulfshore Blvd. N., #803 Naples, FL 34102 Agents: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President Paula N.C. McMichael, AICP Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as Amerisite CB MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 303 multi -family dwelling units, up to 70,000 square feet of commercial shopping center uses, up to 85,000 square feet of mini -warehouse self -storage uses and up to 40 trucks for lease. The subject property is comprised of three parcels and is owned by Amerisite LLC. PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Revised: April 26, 2022 Page 1 of 15 Packet Pg. 1823 17.B.1 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1000 feet north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 18.95+/- acres (see location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The MPUD rezone and the companion GMPA seek to maintain the uses permitted by the existing C-4 district and add truck rental and leasing, a gas station, and to permit 303 multi -family residential dwelling units. Intentionally blank PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 2 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1824 �a-0 m C <. 0 C' N a� D Iry � o r cD n C 0 v cc I PROJECT LOCATION '3f� f uni DR Pal io TER`- f ,a P facia TER 5 � Russ C. t p6miku CT - Ilg CV-. atm Lucelfu TER 5 J �I 4 Johns RD Y4 ti Kam ,� Ca11e Can s Arnitv RD + CT t Location Map Freedom Cl m ® DRI pekverance A O FIRST ASSY. YINST- EDU- 8 REHAB- 61i1snp r 1` MPUDI `r Milano^ g C B 5 SITE ® A P U D LOCATION �m ' - --El O RD'S ® Y 3a g G PU D _4 awn _p_Bette*1hfA4'®_—� GCODTURN CENTER MP arL MPUD HAMMOCK PARK MI CDMIAERCE CENTER MCMULLEN asw I m — HACIENDA M A C S LAKES DRI. PDI MPUD 1FAG1G •: �• TFLSC- Petition plumber: PL20210001103 Zoning Map Packet Pg. 1825 17.B.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of AmeriSite CB MPUD: North: Undeveloped land with a zoning designation of Agricultural (A) District East: Developed with Florida Power & Light (FPL) utilities with a zoning designation of Agricultural (A) District South: Undeveloped land with a zoning designation of Good Turn Center MPUD which is approved for commercial uses and a skilled nursing care facility West: Collier Boulevard, a six -lane arterial roadway, and then developed with commercial and a golf course with a current zoning designation of Naples Country Club (1.67 DU/AC) which is approved for residential, golf course, and commercial, commercial, and office uses Aerial Photo (Hole Montes, Inc.) PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 4 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1826 17.B.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject +18.95-acre site is designated Urban, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict (MUAC #7 — Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard) and is also within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map; and zoned C-4 (General Commercial) with use limitations (Ord. No. 2014- 28). The MUAC allows the full array of commercial uses (C-1 thru C-5), and the URF allows an eligible base density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre (28 dwelling units) and a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre (48 dwelling units) with the acquisition and redemption of Transfer of Development Rights Credits. The applicant is requesting approval of up to 303 multi -family (apartment or owner -occupied) dwelling units (16 DU/A). Additionally, the applicant is requesting to expand the commercial uses currently allowed on the Amerisite parcels to include gasoline service station (prohibited by Ord. No. 2014-28) and truck rental with up to forty trucks. The proposed density is inconsistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The two commercial uses noted above are consistent with uses allowed in the Mixed -Use Activity Center. However, the Board of County Commissioners accepted the East Naples Community Development Plan (ENCDP) in October 2020, which identifies gasoline service station use and outdoor storage uses (i.e., forty trucks) as undesirable uses. There is a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) petition, PL20210001104, that provides for the requested density. Therefore, the MPUD may only be found consistent with the GMP if the GMPA is approved and becomes effective. Regarding the ENCDP, the CCPC and BCC may determine the appropriateness of the requested uses which are not consistent with the vision expressed in that Plan. Transportation Element: : In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's November 27, 2021, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 5 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1827 17.B.1 segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the PUD provided with the proposed rezoning the applicant is requesting a maximum of 303 multi -family residential dwelling units, 70,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area, 85,000 square feet of mini -warehouse and forty rental trucks. The TIS provided indicated a current zoning development scenario that is based on the approved plans for "Amerimed Center," dated March of 2006. The Amerimed Center consisted of 189,500 square feet of Commercial C-4 uses. Staff evaluated the TIS and agrees that this scenario present a reasonable trip count based on existing zoning designation. The proposed new mixed -use development represents a potential (161) reduction in the number of PM peak hour trips. Specifically, the TIS indicates that the proposed development will generate approximately +/-493 two-way PM peak hour net trips on the adjacent road network. According to the current 2021 AUIR, Collier Boulevard (CR 951) from Davis Boulevard to Rattlesnake Hammock Road has a current service volume of 3,000 and a remaining capacity of approximately 417 north bound trips and is currently operating at LOS "D". There is a projected trip bank expected deficiency in 2031(1). Rattlesnake Hammock Road from Collier Boulevard to Santa Barbara Boulevard has a current service volume of 2,900 and a remaining capacity of approximately 1,949 west bound trips and is currently operating at a LOS "B". 1. Staff notes that Collier Boulevard from Davis to Green Boulevard are in the 5-year work program as funded design -build improvements which include improvements to the I-75 interchange and the six expansion of the remaining 4-lane portion of Collier Boulevard. It is anticipated that these improvements will improve the capacity of Collier Boulevard noted above and adjacent to the proposed development. Based on the information in the TIS provided with this petition the subject links noted above have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, Transportation planning staff finds the petition in compliance with the GMP and recommends approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 6 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1828 17.B.1 (CCME). The project site consists of .40 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.40 acres of preservation will be provided either through on -site preservation of the native vegetation or through an off -site mitigation payment. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the GMP, unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrent with the PUD and the uses and intensities align. STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or to amend MPUDs shall be in the form of a MPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The MPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUDZ petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD preserve requirement is 0.40 acres, which meets the minimum preservation requirement. The preservation will be met either through on -site preservation of 0.40 acres or by a monetary donation, utilizing the off -site mitigation alternative in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.f.vi. The property contains an active bald eagle's nest which will require a bald eagle management plan as part of the review for the site development plan and/or plat. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are readily available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent Collier Boulevard right-of-way along the west side of the property. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Adequate downstream wastewater system capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review through a thorough engineering analysis, which will be discussed at a mandatory pre -submittal conference with representatives from the Public Utilities Engineering and Project Management Division and the Growth Management Development Review Division. Any improvements to the Collier County Water -Sewer District's wastewater transmission system necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the Collier County Water -Sewer District at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 7 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1829 17.B.1 Landscape Review: Staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the LDC and recommends approval of this project. The buffer types labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the Land Development Code. Stormwater Review: Stormwater staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Zoninz Services Review: The property was previously zoned C-3 (parcel 00418200007) and C-5 (parcels 00418600001 and 00417720009) and were collectively rezoned to C-4 in 2014 via Ordinance 14-28. The property was also subject to a GMPA to reconfigure the boundary and increase the size of the northeast quadrant of Activity Center #7 by 9.24 acres, subsequently including the entire property within the Activity Center #7 (Ordinance 2014-27). In 2014, the property was also approved for a Conditional Use to allow for indoor air-conditioned self -storage buildings (Resolution 2014-152). The Conditional Use has not yet been developed. The 19-acre property is zoned C-4, and allows for a variety of general commercial uses, along with the approved conditional use for an indoor air-conditioned self -storage facility. The proposed PUD rezone seeks to permit a mix of multi -family residential and commercial uses. The property is located within Mixed Use Activity Center #7, which is comprised of approximately 197.5 acres around the intersection of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Activity Center #7 includes a variety of Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) that allow for various uses that include commercial, hotel, office, residential, and assisted living facilities. The adjacent zoning to the south, The Good Turn Center MPUD, permits up to 100,000 square feet of commercial land uses and skilled nursing care facilities with a maximum of two hundred units (21 dwelling units per acre). The Hammock Park MPUD, located south of The Good Turn MPUD at the intersection of C.R 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, permits a mix of commercial uses and up to 265 multi -family dwelling units. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD is a 2,262-acre project located at the southeast corner of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road and extends east of the subject property. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD permits up to 327,500 square feet of retail commercial area, 70,000 square feet of business park or education facility, and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units consisting of a variety of housing types. Companion item to this petition (GMPA-PL20210001104; Mixed Use Activity Center #7) will seek to amend this mixed -use activity center to allow 303 multi -family dwelling units. The proposed MPUD includes commercial uses in the underlying zoning district and two additional commercial uses that are not currently permitted within the underlying zoning district. The two additional commercial uses are gasoline service stations, and truck rental and leasing, without drivers. Staff does not support Commercial Use #86 "truck rental and leasing, without drivers" with a maximum number of rental trucks on -site that will not exceed forty trucks. This is a C-5 use which is too intensive for this area and does not align with the vision of the East Naples Community Development Plan. Moreover, it should also be noted that Commercial Use # 37, Gasoline service stations, was a prohibited use per Ordinance 14-28 as there was opposition to adding this use into the rezone petition. Staff still remains firm on not adding this use into this proposed MPUD. As such, staff recommends approval of this petition with Commercial Use #37, Gasoline Service stations and Commercial Use #86 truck rental and leasing, without drivers" use PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 8 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1830 17.B.1 with a maximum number of rental trucks on -site that will not exceed forty trucks; being deleted from the PUD document. CONCURRENT PETITION AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY On December 16, 2021, staff had conducted a pre -application meeting for Latigo Apartments - (SDP) PL20210002987 for a 303-unit apartment complex. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water transmission and wastewater transmission mains are readily available along Collier Boulevard at the western boundary of the PUD, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed project. The development's stormwater will outfall directly into the adjacent Henderson Canal. Stormwater management details will be evaluated at time of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) and County Site Development Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report and may only be found consistent with the GMP if the GMPA is approved and becomes effective. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 9 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1831 17.B.1 As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The MPUD is required to provide at least 30% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Pursuant to Sec. 134-57(a) of the Collier County Code of Ordinances, availability of potable water and wastewater services must be verified in writing by the CCWSD prior to submittal of construction documents. No public utility facility adequacy issues are anticipated at this time. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner, and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. One deviation is proposed in connection with this request to rezone to MPUD. See deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 14. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report, and PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 10 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1832 17.B.1 recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the GMP, unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrent with the PUD and the uses and intensities align. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size and therefore will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries and coincide with the GMP subdistrict boundaries. The zoning map on page 3 of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject parcel. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed under the current zoning classification. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the GMP, unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrent with the PUD and the uses and intensities align. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 11 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1833 17.B.1 i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUDZ request is not anticipated to create stormwater management problems in the area; provided an environmental resource permit that addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, management of importing stormwater flows, on -site stormwater treatment, and attenuation storage is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The current zoning designation of General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District includes a maximum allowable height for principal uses of seventy-five feet. The proposed MPUD includes a maximum allowable height of multi -family residential and commercial buildings of fifty feet zoned and fifty-seven feet actual. The proposed MPUD also eliminates the potential for numerous manufacturing and commercial uses that could impact light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties to the north, east, and south are not developed and the property to the west is developed. The basic premise underlying all the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 12 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1834 17.B.1 Because the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed uses and development standards are not permitted, according to the existing classification. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 13 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1835 17.B.1 with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (ALF/Group Housing) "Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1, which states the maximum floor area ratio for ALF/Group Housing shall not exceed 0.45, to instead allow for a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6." Petitioner's Justification: This deviation is requested to allow for more floor area for group housing projects, as these projects proved a significant range of recreational amenities, which when provided within the building increase the total square footage of the structure, thus increasing the FAR. Newer group housing projects also provide for larger interior living spaces, necessitating a larger FAR. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on October 14, 2021 at the Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting Room B, located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway in Naples. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:35 p.m. and ended at 6:00 p.m. The applicant's agent explained the request for the proposed PUD Rezone. Paula McMichael, the agent, conducted a PowerPoint presentation and gave a detailed explanation of the project. The meeting was then opened to attendees for questions. The concerns from the public were: • What could be constructed? The agent responded that the rezone intends to permit C-4 uses with the addition of gas stations, self -storage, truck rentals, and residential multi -family. • Which development scenario was most likely to be built? The agents' consultants indicated the 303-unit multi -family was most likely to be constructed. • Would the housing component be market rate and be either condominiums or apartments? Answer: The contact purchaser indicated the intent is to provide market rate rental apartments. PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 14 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1836 17.B.1 No commitments were discussed at this NIM meeting. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment B. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is within the 330- and 660-foot bald eagle nest protection zones. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on April 22, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition PUDZ-PL20210001103 subject to the following conditions of approval and subject to approval of the GMPA: 1. In PUD document, Exhibit A: • Commercial Use #37, Gasoline service stations (5541, subject to LDC section 5.05.05) — Delete this use as this was a prohibited use per Ordinance 14-28. • Commercial Use #86, Commercial Use #86 truck rental and leasing, without drivers" use with a maximum number of rental trucks on -site that will not exceed forty trucks. Delete this use as this is too intensive and does not align with the vision of the East Naples Community Development Plan. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) Application/Backup Materials PUDZ-PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD Page 15 of 15 Revised: April 26, 2022 Packet Pg. 1837 17.B.2 ORDINANCE NO.2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE AMERISITE CB MPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 303 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS OF WHICH 68 UNITS WILL QUALIFY AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING, UP TO 70,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER USES, AND UP TO 85,000 SQUARE FEET OF MINI -WAREHOUSE SELF -STORAGE USES; AND TRUCK LEASING AND GAS STATION USES SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 18.95f ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 14-152, A CONDITIONAL USE FOR INDOOR SELF STORAGE AND ORDINANCE NO. 14-28, A REZONE TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4); AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20210001103] WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP and Paula N.C. McMichael, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Amerisite, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: [21-CPS-02123/1724861/1]138 Amerisite / PL20210001103 Pagel of 3 6/7/22 Packet Pg. 1838 17. B.2 SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 14, Township 50, Range 26, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the 18.95+/- acre project to be known as the Amerisite CB MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 303 residential dwelling units of which 68 units will qualify as affordable housing, up to 70,000 square feet of commercial shopping center uses, and up to 85,000 square feet of mini -warehouse self -storage uses; and truck leasing and gas station uses will not be allowed, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Resolution No. 14-152, a conditional use for indoor self -storage and Ordinance No. 14- 28, a rezone to general commercial (C-4) are hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2022- becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 52022. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA an , Deputy Clerk William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman [21-CPS-02123/1724861/1]138 Amerisite / PL20210001103 Page 2 of 3 6/7/22 Packet Pg. 1839 17.B.2 Approved as to form and legality: � v Heidi Ashton-Cicko b Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A: Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: Requested Deviations from LDC Exhibit F: Developer Commitments [21-CPS-02123/1724861 /1 ] 138 Amerisite / PL20210001103 Page 3 of 3 6/7/22 Packet Pg. 1840 17.B.2 EXHIBIT A AMERISITE CB MPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES: The PUD may be developed as commercial, residential, or a mixture of residential and commercial uses. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part, within the Amerisite CB MPUD, for other than the following: TRACT MU - MIXED- USE DEVELOPMENT I. Principal Uses A. Multi -family residential units not to exceed 303 total units. B. Commercial Uses, not to exceed 70,000 sq. ft. of commercial shopping center and 85,000 sq. ft. of self -storage (mini -warehouse), and excluding gas stations and truck rentals. 1. Accounting (8721). 2. Adjustment and collection services (7322). 3. Advertising agencies (7311). 4. Advertising -miscellaneous (7319). 5. Agricultural services (0783). 6. Amusement and recreation services, indoor (limited to 7991 physical fitness facilities, gyms, yoga, karate, dance instruction and similar indoor fitness facilities). 7. Apparel and accessory stores (5611-5699). 8. Architectural services (8712). 9. Auditing (8721). 10. Banks, credit Unions and trusts (6011-6099). 11. Barber shops (7241, except for barber schools). 12. Beauty shops (7231, except for beauty schools). 13. Bookkeeping services (8721). 14. Business associations (8611). 15. Business consulting services (8748). 16. Business credit institutions (6153-6159). 17. Carpet and upholstery cleaning (7217). 18. Child day care services (8351). 19. Churches. 20. Commercial art and graphic design (7336). 21. Commercial photography (7335). 22. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers). 23. Computer programming, data processing and other services (7371-7379). Page 1 of 15 HA2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1841 17.B.2 24. Computer and computer software stores (5734). 25. Credit reporting services (7323). 26. Dance studios, schools and halls, indoor (7911). 27. Department stores (5311), not to exceed 20,000 gross square feet of leasable floor area. 28. Direct mail advertising services (7331). 29. Drug stores (5912). 30. Eating and drinking establishments (5812 and 5813) excluding bottle clubs. All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption are subject to the locational requirements of LDC section 5.05.01. 31. Engineering services (8711). 32. Essential services, subject to section 2.01.03 33. Facilities support management services (8744). 34. Federal and federally -sponsored credit agencies (6111). 35. Food stores (groups 5411-5461). 36. Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners (7212). 37. Glass stores (5231). 38. General merchandise stores (5331-5399), not to exceed 20,000 gross square feet of leasable floor area. 39. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to §429.02 F.S. and ch. 59A-36 F.A.C.; independent living units; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to ch. 651 F.S. and ch. 690-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC section 5.05.04 40. Hardware stores (5251). 41. Health services, miscellaneous (8092). 42. Health services, offices and clinics (8011-8049). 43. Home furniture and furnishings stores (5712-5719). 44. Hospitals (8062). 45. Hotels and motels (7011, 7021 and 7041) when located within an activity center. 46. Household appliance stores (5722). 47. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (6311-6399, 6411). 48. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (0781). 49. Laundries and dry-cleaning, coin operated - self-service (7215). 50. Laundry and garment services, miscellaneous (7219). 51. Legal services (8111). 52. Libraries (8231). 53. Management services (8741, 8742). 54. Medical and dental laboratories (8071 and 8072). 55. Medical equipment rental and leasing (7352). 56. Membership organizations, miscellaneous (8699). 57. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (7997). Page 2 of 15 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINALAOCX Packet Pg. 1842 17.B.2 58. Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents (6162). 59. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, air-conditioned, indoor, mini- and self -storage warehousing only). 60. Museums and art galleries (8412). 61. Musical instrument stores (5736). 62. News syndicates (7383). 63. Nursing and professional care facilities (8051-8052). 64. Paint stores (5231). 65. Personnel supply services (7361 & 7363). 66. Photocopying and duplicating services (7334). 67. Photographic studios, portrait (7221). 68. Physical fitness facilities (7991). 69. Professional membership organizations (8621). 70. Public relations services (8743). 71. Radio, television and consumer electronics stores (5731), not to exceed 20,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. 72. Radio, television and publishers advertising representatives (7313). 73. Real Estate (6512, 6531-6552). 74. Record and prerecorded tape stores (5735). 75. Religious organizations (8661). 76. Research, development and testing services (8731-8734). 77. Retail - miscellaneous (5921-5963, 5992-5995, 5999). 78. Secretarial and court reporting services (7338). 79. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (6211-6289). 80. Security systems services (7382). 81. Surveying services (8713). 82. Tax return preparation services (7291). 83. Travel agencies (4724, no other transportation services). 84. United States Postal Service (4311, except major distribution center). 85. Veterinary services (0741 & 0742, excluding outside kenneling). 86. Wallpaper stores (5231). 87. Watch, clock and jewelry repair (7631). 88. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner of the Board of Zoning Appeals, by the process outlined in the LDC. II. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, including, but not limited to: Page 3 of 15 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite C13 MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1843 17.B.2 A. Residential Accessory Uses: 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents of the PUD, such as swimming pools, fitness centers, dining facilities, sports courts, and recreation/amenity buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, signage, entry gates and gatehouse, and similar structures. 3. Temporary sales facilities may be permitted. B. Commercial Accessory Uses: 1. One caretaker's residences, subject to LDC Section 5.03.05. 2. Temporary display of merchandise during business hours provided it does not adversely affect pedestrian or vehicular traffic or public hearing or safety as determined by the County. Merchandise storage and display is prohibited within front yards adjacent to public rights of way, unless permitted through a temporary use permit for a special event. 3. Customary accessory uses and structures to commercial development, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, and similar structures. III.Amplified Sound: The use of amplified sound shall be limited to 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM. TRACT P — PRESERVE A. Permitted Uses and Structures: 1. Passive recreation areas. 2. Water management facilities in wetlands and water management structures. 3. Mitigation areas. 4. Boardwalks and trails. 5. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. Page 4 of 15 HA2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1844 17.B.2 EXHIBIT B AMERISITE CB MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for residential and commercial land uses within the Amerisite CB MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TARIN T. RF.CTTIFNTIAI, & COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MULTI -FAMILY CLUBHOUSE/ RECREATION BUILDINGS COMMERCIAL' PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MIN. LOT AREA N/A N/A 10,000 S.F. MIN. LOT WIDTH N/A N/A 100 FEET MIN. FLOOR AREA 700 S.F./D.U. N/A 700 S.F. MINIMUM YARDS EXTERNAL — MEASURED FROM THE PUD BOUNDARY NORTH PROPERTY LINE 35' 35' 35' SOUTH PROPERTY LINE 50% OF BH, NO LESS THAN 15' 50% OF BH, NO LESS THAN 15' 50% OF BH, NO LESS THAN 15' EAST PROPERTY LINE 170' 170' 170' WEST PROPERTY LINE 100 30' 50% OF BH, NO LESS THAN 25' MINIMUM YARDS INTERNAL- MEASURED FROM INTERNAL LOT LINES MIN. FRONT YARD 10 FEET4 10 FEET4 15 FEET MIN. SIDE YARD 15 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET MIN. REAR YARD 15 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. LAKE SETBACK 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FEET or''/2 Sum of BH, whichever is greater 10 FEET 20 FEET or''/2 Sum of BH, whichever is greater MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT ZONED/ACTUAL 50'/57' 35'/42' 50'/57'Z,s MAX. FAR (ALF/GROUP HOUSING N/A N/A 0.6 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MIN. FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS MIN. SIDE YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN. REAR YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES' 10 FEET 10 FEET SPS Page 5 of 15 H12021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1845 17.B.2 CLUBHOUSE/ MULTI -FAMILY RECREATION COMMERCIAL' BUILDINGS MAX. HEIGHT ZONED 35'/42' SPS SPS & ACTUAL I I _F SPS = Same as Principal Structures; NTE = not to exceed; S.P. = square feet; isn = ouuuing licigtit. Footnotes: 1. Indoor air -conditional self -storage buildings may be only permitted within 100 feet of the property line adjacent to Collier Boulevard if the building (s) is not visible from Collier Boulevard. Office space accessory and incidental to the use of indoor air-conditioned self -storage, if located in a separate building, is not subject to this distance limitation. 2. Retail uses shall be limited to a maximum zoned height of 35 feet. 3. Group care facilities and hotels/motels are permitted a maximum zoned height of 75 feet. 4. Front yards for parcels abutting a street or internal driveway shall be measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). 5. Minimum distance between accessory structures or between accessory structures and principal structures. II. Design Standards A. Architectural Theme. i. All buildings, signage, landscaping, and visible architectural infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified. Said unified architectural theme shall include: similar architectural design and use of similar materials throughout all of the buildings, signs, and fences/walls to be erected on the subject parcel. ii. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the subject site. An architectural plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for the Site Development Plan approval demonstrating compliance with these standards. B. Unified Design Theme. The project will be developed, whether through a platted subdivision or through a Site Development Plan, with the following: i. Shared access from Collier Boulevard; ii. Shared stormwater management design; and iii. Lighting designed and shielded to prevent spillage or glare on adjacent parcels. iv. Common architectural, landscaping, and signage design theme. C. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be in accordance with LDC section 4.06.00. The required landscape buffer along the northern property line shall be 10 feet wide with LDC Type "B" Buffer plantings. Page 6 of 15 HA2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCI'Mmerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1846 17.B.2 D. Indoor self -storage (SIC 4225) — Access to indoor air-conditioned self -storage buildings, including any roll -up doors, shall only be allowed on the east side of the building, or on any other side of the building where such access is not visible from Collier Boulevard. Outdoor storage is prohibited. Page 7 of 15 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amedsite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1847 17.B.2 M M z a r a x I�LNQ USE SUMMARY NAM YE�€TA_LQi9-Ah.4 �i i..$�AS€ __........... (lescr_; iptton Acreage Percant Existing Native Vegetation 0.40 Acres NOTES: Mixed Use (Trail 1g60 97.9% MinimumO05iteNativeVegetatbn 0A0Acres 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT MAY BE FULFILLED OFF -SITE. Preservation R uirements FPreserve ffratt P) 0.40 2.1% Minimum Open Space Requirement I --- -- Total: L4--- S00% 5.69 Acres Mated Use 19 x 30% 11 �I POTENTIAL INTERCONNECTION IF THE AMERISITE CB MPUD IS DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL ZONING: A � USES 1236.88' (M) _1_ 20_WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT (OR 3927, PG 3199) — _ _ — --------- -- _2 {�0 _WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT -r- --- - -—_r_ --- - 15' UTILITY j 10' WIDE TYPE "B" LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT, (OR3927 I i COUNTY WELL SITE PG 3199) 1 10' WIDE TYPE "A" I j LANDSCAPE BUFFER _ 100 170' = 11 RSON ECANAL TRACT „P, F.P.L. EASEMENT CREEK PRESERVE:, RIGHT-OF-WAY I I RIGHT-OF-WAY (OR 3129, PG 2240) 1 I I POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA ; _--__ - COLLIER COUNTY 20' WIDE TYPE "D" , F P.L. EASEMENT TEMPORARY --LANDSCAPE BUFFER (OR 1018, PG 1022), CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT I PATHWAY TRACT "MU' ; INTERCONNECTION MIXED USE / 1 PATHWAY % I ; INTERCONNECTION 40' X 50' UTILITY' EASEMENT I I (OR3927 PG 3199) i / COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO BE DETERMINED WELL SITE _ J AT TIME OF SDP POTENTIAL Zoning: Good Turn Center - MPUD INTERCONNECTION Q Iani��kdT,1t• n o SCALE: 1' = 50' Packet Pg. 1 871 17.B.2 EXHIBIT D AMERISITE CB MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 (TAX PARCEL NO. 00416800001) A PORTION, PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COLLIER IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWED: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY AS LOCATED IN THE WEST 100 FEET OF SAID PARCEL, LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY. PARCEL 2 (TAX PARCEL NO. 00418200007) A PORTION, PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COLLIER IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BEING ORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, OF SAID SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY AS LOCATED IN THE WEST 100 FEET OF SAID PARCEL, LYING AND BEING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3 (TAX PARCEL NO. 00417720009) A PORTION, PARCEL OF TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COLLIER, STATE OF FLORIDA, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY AS LOCATED IN THE WEST 100 FEET OF SAID PARCEL, LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 827,640 SQUARE FEET OR 19.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Page 9 of 15 HA2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amensite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1849 17.B.2 EXHIBIT E AMERISITE CB MPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation 1: Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1, which states the maximum floor area ratio for ALF/Group Housing shall not exceed 0.45, to instead allow for a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. Page 10 of 15 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1850 17.B.2 EXHIBIT F AMERISITE CB MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The purpose of this section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. I. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this MPUD approval, the Managing Entity is Amerisite, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. Development of the subject property shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections and parts of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan (SDP), excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. D. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Page 11 of 15 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\PostCCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1851 17.B.2 II. TRANSPORTATION: A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 493 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. Vehicular and Pedestrian interconnection will be provided to the south to allow access to all connection points with The Good Turn PUD, consistent with the conceptual PUD Master Plan and subject to an agreement that the developer of the Good Turn PUD shares in the cost of the existing bridge. The final location of the access point will be coordinated with the adjacent property owner and a cross -access easement, or an access easement to the public for public use without responsibility of maintenance by Collier County, will be provided at time of the first Site Development Plan or Plat. The connection and supporting infrastructure will be constructed to the property line by the developer or successors or assigns prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy. The interconnections shall remain open to the public. III. PLANNING: A. The developer, its successor or assignee, shall provide to any prospective resident an actual and recorded notice with respect to the noise that is associated with the Swamp Buggy Races located at 8250 Collier Boulevard, Naples, Florida, within the Florida Sports Park (within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD) as it relates to the location of this MPUD. The notice shall disclose that the Florida Sports Park and Swamp Buggy operations regularly generate traffic, and noise which may be heard on the subject_property, both during the day and into the evening, including, but not limited to, noise from swamp buggy racing, tractor pulls, festivals, and music concerts. This statement must be presented to the resident prior to entering into any contract. Within 120 days of approval of this rezone, the owner shall record in the public records of Collier County a notice of proximity to the Florida Sports Park and Swamp Buggy grounds. The notice shall disclose that the Florida Sports Park and Swamp Buggy operations regularly generate noise which can be heard on the Collier Boulevard Commercial property, both during the day and into the evening, including but not limited to, noise from swamp buggy racing, tractor pulls, festivals, and music concerts. The legal description of the property subject to this rezone shall be attached to the notice. B. The developer of any group housing, including a retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to the following operational standards for the units in the group housing, including, but not limited to, independent living units, assisted living units, or skilled nursing units: Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing Page 12 of 15 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1852 17.B.2 units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: i. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; ii. There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; iii. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents' needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; iv. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; v. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; vi. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; vii. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. viii. Group housing for seniors shall be constructed to have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site in the event of a hurricane. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that are required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities ("State Requirements for Educational Facilities, 2014") and shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up generator for a period of no less than 96 hours. C. The sale or rental of adult oriented books, videos, tapes, or other material in conjunction with any permitted use is prohibited. D. A minimum of 40 percent of the 303 dwelling units will be one -bedroom units. IV. UTILITIES: A. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. Page 13 of 15 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\PostCCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1853 17.B.2 V. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. At time of development review, a Black Bear Management Plan will be required. B. At time of development review, a Bald Eagle Management Plan may be required. VI. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: A. The developer shall provide, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a residential development, a new, quiet -running extended run-time towable 45kw (minimum -kw) generator per Emergency Management's specifications. The towable generation will be a one -tome developer contribution based on the number of units permitted at time of SDP to meet the hurricane mitigation impact for evacuation concerns. The generator specifications must be pre -approved by the Department of Emergency Management as the County has certain interoperable standards and required safety options. VII. AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITMENTS A. Of the 303 multifamily dwelling units, the project shall comply with the following: 2) Thirty-four units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and thirty-four units will rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the AMI for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. AMI rent limit adjustments will be made on an annual basis according to the most recent Collier County approved Table of Rental Rates. 2) a. Thirty-four units will be sold to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and thirty- four units will be sold to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 100% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy and sold to households that qualify for the designated income thresholds. Prior to sale of any of the 68 units, the owner and developer will record a restrictive covenant in the public records of Collier County identifying the affordable units and the income threshold pertaining to each unit. The covenant will state that each unit will be initially sold and subsequently sold to qualifying households for a period of 30 years of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each unit. It will also state that at least 30 days prior to the sale of any unit, the County's Community and Human Services Division will be notified in writing and provided documents for income verification and certification on forms acceptable to Collier County. The closing on the sale may occur after the County confirms that the household qualifies for the designated income thresholds. Page 14 of 15 HA2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1854 17.B.2 b. All deeds for the 68 affordable units will reference the restrictive covenant, identify the official record book and page number of the recorded restrictive covenant, and contain the following statement: "This property is to be conveyed and occupied in accordance with Exhibit F, Section VI1, Affordable Housing Commitments, Paragraph 2) of Ord. No. , the Amerisite CB MPUD, and the Declaration of Restrictive Covenant recorded in Official Records Book Page of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Notice of any subsequent conveyance or other transfer of rights of this property is required to be given to the Collier County Community and Human Services Division, its successors or assigns, 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 211, Naples, FL 34112. This requirement shall run with the land and be contained within all future conveyance documents for a period of thirty (30) years form the date of issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for this property." B. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units. VIII. DENSITY CALCULATION AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) CREDITS A. To achieve the maximum allowable density of 303 units: The first 18 units above the base density of a total of 28 units requires redemption of TDR Credits from qualified Sending Lands. B. A density calculation and TDR Credit tracking sheet shall be submitted with each Site Development Plan ( SDP) and/ or plat for the redemption of TDR Credits needed for the project. Page 15 of 15 HA2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) (6-7-2022) FINAL.docx Packet Pg. 1855 17. B.4 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petition of the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirements of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petition or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s). NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED PAULA N. C. MCMICHAEL, AICP, WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERTY NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL-20210001103 and PL-20210001104. 4 Hole Montes, Inc.. 950 Encore Way SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP. Vice President Naples, FL 34110 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 12th day of May 2022, by means of physical presence or online notarization, by Paula N.C. McMichael, who is personally kno n to me'`_ or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. ]Assni. STEPHANIE KARNotary Public • State Signatureof Notary Public Commission N GG 9My Comm. Expires Manded throu h National N'-"J�V�+' `I e�� 1 Printed Name of Notary Public (Stamp with serial number) Packet Pg. 1856 N 0 IL 0 IL 2 m 0 d CO) m E Q to 00 N C T Co 0 C N .- N Q Im C �L d x Packet Pg. 1857 2a3 17.B.5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . NOTICE'OF INTENT,TOI CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commisslorers (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. +� ..on June28,2022, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami x' "Trall, Naples, FL, to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER SUBDISTRICT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AHD ACT Min CENTER 07 MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES TO ALLOW UP TO 3D3 MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENT OR OWNER -OCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS OF WHICH 68 UNITS WILL ra QUALIFY AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE AMERISITE CB MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN ADDITION TO UP TO 70M SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER DEVELOPMENT AND UP TO 85,000 SQUARE FEET OF MINI - WAREHOUSE SELF -STORAGE; AND TRUCK LEASING AND GAS: STATION USES SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED; AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTION AMENDMENT. TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY iS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF t8.95* ACRES. [PL2021o001104] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDiN6 ORDMiANCE NUMBER 200441, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING.ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE AMERISITE CB MPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 303 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS OF WHICH 68 UNITS WILL QUALIFY AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING; UP TO 70,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER USES AND UP TO 85,000 SQUARE FEET OF MINI -WAREHOUSE SELF -STORAGE g: USES; AND TRUCK LEASING AND GAS STATION USES SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY110DO FEET NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COt1NIY, FiARIDA, CONSISTING OF 18.952 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NO.14-152. A CONDITIONAL USE FOR INDOOR SELF STORAGE AND ORDINANCE NO.14-2B, A REZONE TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4); AND BY PROVIDING ANlEE-QAAa<E.[Pl�ZQ210001t03] Hacienda Lakes: PKWY ym Project 60irt'l Rattlesnake Hagnmock RD — Copies of the proposed Ordinances are on file with the Clerk to the Board end are available for inspection. All Interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. ' NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda Rem to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/ our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional Information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercounty8.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. ff you are a person witha disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trall East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening w, devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COuMY, FLORK)A WIWAM L MCDANIEL, JR., CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Ann Jenne]ahn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-CCIOB95T9g-a1 2 a r- m tQ Z m N 0 C :t7 C Z m N 0 N N m a Packet Pg. 1858 :OLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE 1VWW.00IIiercountyfI.jzo400 Assigned Planner: Tim Finn Project intormation Project Name: AmerSite CB MPUD (PUDZ PL#; 20210001103 416800001, 417720009 C-4 Activity Property I®#: 418200007 Current Zoning: y Center 7 Blvd. Project Address: 8552 Collier City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34114 Applicant: Paula N . C . McMichael, AICP, VP Planning Svc . Hole Montes, Inc . Agent Name: Paula N.C. McMichael Phone: 239-254-2018 Agent/Firm Address: 950 Encore Way City: Naples State; FL Zips 34110 property Owner;Amerisite LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Tota I Acreage; 19 + / - ii. Proposed'# of Residential Units: 303 iii. Proposed ';Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/P!.#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page E 1 of S • • MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT vwwocoffiercountyfLigov As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning TIM 1 1I q i! .in AURSESAUE • 11 Meeting - eeNotes 77 R' f +in,! ! - • •! • "M ITSS �• • 0 If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning bepartments. Then, if the petitian is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the. four persons below in their Utilities and. Planning Depts. -along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddieton0nanlesoov.com Disclaimer.' Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre Application lt�eeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative bode and LQC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 I omasuarkeVEN From: FinnTimothy Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Thomas, Wednesday, June O2, 2b21 10:22 AM ThomasClarkeVEN Pre-App - PL20210001103 - AmenSite CB MPUD (PUDZ)' PUD Template.docx Follow up Flagged The only pre-app note I have is to follow the PUD Template attached to this email. `' Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Phone: 239.252.4312 2/09/20 }7: Ndples Florida 34104 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey ot:http:l/bitJyLCoIHerZoning. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records.. Ifiyou do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do'not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 i I ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2021 9*23 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN, FinnTimothy, MedinaJosephine, FaulknerSue Subject: AmeriSite MPUD Pre App Notes Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas, notes apply for both GMPA and PUD as applicable, Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist as well as methodology on the next page with a note that methodology will be .by email to staff: Please also add the following notes: il required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by ema will be collected at time of PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip Limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Also provide interconnection commitment to the north and south using standard language: "Vehicular and Pedestrian interconnection will be provided to the to allow access to all connection points with ,consistent with the conceptual PUD Master Plan, The final location of the access point will be coordinated with the adjacent property owner and a cross -access easement will be provided at time of the first Site Development Plan or Plat. The connection and supporting infrastructure will be constructed to the property line by the developer or successors or assigns prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy. The interconnections shall remain open to the public," Thanks, M ichael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 ., Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this. entity, Instead, .contact this office by #elephone or in writing. 1 ThomasClarkeVEN From: MedinaJosephine Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 202.1 4:08 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: FaulknerSue,• FinnTimothy Subject: PL20210001103 - Amensite CB MPUD (PUDZ) Pre-app notes Attachments: PL20210001103 - Pre-app AmeriSite CB MPUD (PUDZ) Comp Planning .docx Tom, Please see`atta%0 V; Comp planning pre-app comments for PL20210 for the delay on this. Respectfully, Principal Planner Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Office: (239) 252-2306 Josephine.Medina@colliercoi ntvtl.�ov )3;—AmerISifie CB MPUD (PUDZ�0 Really sorry Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing, i r� •� �. �, • .�t COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net z; � 1 � � t � .., �r s . � � � � •-• '�� .•..•. .�..4agr.rag_[_.vv wv v®«vva.«�.. pgvve..`..vl■.VP..«►/✓s.wvvmvVvd�iidf9i. �w�s WFPY... +• Comp Planning: PL20210001103 - ArneriSite CB MPUD {PUDZ). The subject site (parcel number #'s 00418200007, 00416800001, 00417720009) is ±18.95 acres and designated Urban Designation, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and _ _ _.. located within Mixed Use Activity Center #7 as shown on Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plain. The applicant is proposing C-4 commercial uses, along with one conditional use (self -storage) as currently approved and one C-5 use (truck rental), and/or about 304 apartment or condo units at 16 DU/A. DUs within a newly created Subdistrict (by the companion GMPA) in the FLUE. The Proposed commercial uses being proposed are consistent. with the: FLUE for this portion of MUAC #7. Residential uses are permitted in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict at a low transitional density of no more than 2.5 DU/A —with 1 of the DUs being. allowed from the use of TDR credits.. Currently the applicants' request is not consistent with the Future land Use Element (�LUEj. For the applicant to be consistent with the .FLUE and achieve a density of approximately 16 DUJA, the applicant is proposing the companion GMPA (PL20210001104) to create a new subdistrict. The GMPA must be approved prior tothe approval of the PUDA. Please address .FLUE Policies 5.6, 7.1-7.4. Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre�,4pplication Meeting is based on the best available data at the tirrre of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during. the process. The Adminisfrative Code and LDC dictates the .regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required .data. Updated 7/24/2018 • . 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239�252-2526 From: FinnTimothy <Tiimothy.Finn @colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday,; May 19, 20211:24 PM To. Shar Beddow <sbeddow@gnfire.org> Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting PL20210001103 AmeriSite CB MPUD (PUDZ) Thank you Shar Thomas: Please include in the preapp notes. The preapp for this is June 2 From: Shar Beddow <sbeddow@gnfire.org> Sent: Wednesday,; May 19, 202111*48 AM I _ I_..... To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn _ colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting PL20210001103 - AmeriSite CB MPUD (PUDZ) Mr. Finn, I do not know if I will be able to attend the following meeting so would you Sincerely, Shar Beddow Shar A. Beddow, MSM Deputy Fire Marshal, Fire & Life Safety Section Greater Naples Fire Rescue District 2700 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 (239) 241-1422 or (239) 774-2800 ext 2107 or Cell (239) 920-3659 www.greaternaplesfire.org Proud owner of an NFPA 13D fire sprinklered home.Please click on the: link below for a brief survey. s � �t Professionalism. Compassion please include my notes for this site. Information contained in this email pursuant to Florida Statute 119, is subject to a public records release. This email, .including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients) and may contain legally privileged arrd/or confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended reciplent(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of original message. 2 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier�ov.net 2800 NGRTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 t239j 252-2400 Greater Naples Fire District (GNFD) Pre-app :notes by Shar Beddow, Deputy Fire Marshal at ��, C, `.�.� Sbeddow��nfire.o� 1) Cover sheet, please provide the following per the 7th Edition of the FL Fire Prevention Code: The occupancy type, the occupant load, the: construction type, total square footage, sprinkler intent. This is in addition to the Florida Building Code information on plans. 2) Flow test results from GNFD within last 6 months. Directions https://ccfdin.com/flow- test-request/ Contact GNFD at FLS,�nfire.orR for scheduling or ques#ions. 3) If -fire sprinkler system will be installed, show point of -service and appurtenances, PIV, backf(ow, FDC. 4) Site shall reflect fire access (fire road) from public access throughout site with minimum dimensions of width of 20', height of 13'6", load access of 42 tons, and approved turn around dimensions for fire access roads which end measuring over 150'. In addition, the road shall reflect location in respect to 50' of the entry point/exterior door (door can be opened from exterior) and the furthest point of the building is within 150' if unsprinklered and 450' if sprinkler. If utilizing parking areas, identify those in your fire access plans. 5) Reflect location of existing fire hydrants and proposed addition/relocation of new hydrants within 12' of fire access road. 6) Turning radius of fire access lane is to be concentric and concurrent 25' inside and 49' outside throughout the 90 degree turns and reflected on the autocad plans. co�LIER eouNTlr GovERNMEIVT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT wrww. co I l i e rco u nty�l .gov ,. ,�. � �, .�� Updated 1/12/2�21 Page � 3 of 5 omasuarKeTtrl Sent: To. Subject. Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Thomas, BrownCraig Wednesday, June 02, 2021 11:40 AM ThomasClarkeVEN RE: Pre-App Research for AmenSite CB MPUD (PUDZ) - PL20210001103 Tomorrow Wednesday 6/2/21 at 9*00 AM via SKYPE Plus -Companion GMPA PL20210001104 PUDZ-PUDA checklist FOR REVIEWERS 2-2017.doc Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc Follow up Flagged Here. are my notes,for this one: GMPA Please provide narrative of justification to address Growth Management Plan Conservation Coastal Management ement Objectives and Policies. Policy 6.1.1 and Objective 7.1. (ALSO include this narrative with the PUD petition). This is for the PUD: 2. 3. Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide FLUCFCS. aerial map of the subject property please include the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate which FLU CFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. in a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. An eagle nest is present on the property just south of the subject property, which will require conditions to address protection for the eagle. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Bonneted bat, Black Bear Panther zones ect. EXHIBITS) be sure to include Black Bear and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d- e). (15% present preservation required.) Label the Master plan with a note that the preservation is to be addressed off-siteiand provide the calculation in the packet submitted. 1 4. 5. 6. 7. Please address now the proposed Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Explain now the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and species as required in the CCME. (The preservation Requirement is 15%). minimizes impacts to listed Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite). Provide narrative to address the history, permits, historical aerials to justify the clearing of the vegetation on the property. Check the boxes for FLUCFCS Map and Environmental Data. FEE $2500.00 thanks Development Review Division 239) ,; We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkevEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 20215:45 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@ coil iercountyfl.gov>; Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard @colliercountyfl. gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@coiliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>t FeyEric <Eric.Fey@coiliercountyfl.gov>* JosephitisErin <Erin. Joseph itls@col liercountyfl.gov>, OrthRichard.<Rlchard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov> PollardBrandi <Brandi.Pollard@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>, TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>, YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@colliercountyfl.gov>, BeilowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@col Iiercountyfl.gov> MedinaJosephine <Josephine.Medina@colt iercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre- no Research for AmeriSite CB MPUD (PUDZ) - PL20210001103 Tomorrow Wednesday 6/2/21 at 900 AM via SKYPE Plus -Companion GMPA - PL20210001104 Importance: High Good Afternoon All, Sorry about the late notice folks, been one of those days. Please review the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for Ameri PL20210001103. Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (non- MU) Project Name rw �► 0l* Af Z 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2903.05-2.03.08; 4.08,00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly ..identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations {LDC 3.05.07.13-13; 3.05.07.F; 3.05,07.14.1.&0. Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained. preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b: Preserve Width P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include. ah 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures. shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New S. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so waYranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - I 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GIVIPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13,A.2) Master Plan Contents-P62b 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION —DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC —see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to !LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves.: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. t PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: Environmental Data Checklist Project Name The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 l . Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on'resubmittals. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS:map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality ified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order wetlands must have their functionality scores ver approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water,quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site,. provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations' within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from. listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcels) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and MUM* 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community .types of all. upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other:,, natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil. and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first. development. order submittal. for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf `courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in', the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard' Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain .fully functional. for its intended use after asix-inch rise. in -sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Vellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WR.M-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive VVRM-STs and will comply with the WR.M-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk. Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the .proposed stormwater management system. and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14, 22, For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and. for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LOU and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 fJ The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of protect with respect. to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the. project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? 27. PUD master plan or PPLISDP site plan notes. Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used a the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) From: Beard Laurie Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2021 9:11 AM To: FinnTimothy Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre Application Meeting PL20210001103 - AmeriSite CB MPUD (PUDZ) Attachments: Transportation-PUD monitoring pre app handout 2020.docx PUD Monitoring pre-app notes attached. Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Laurie.Beard aC7CollierCountvFL.aov Phone: (239)-252-5782 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records, If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in Writing. 1 Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD 1Vlonitoring "One entity {hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. the PUD i . Ws closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125,022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not. in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement. of the development." i � i � � ' � � ► � � • • • • � � «11 N' �'' � �' ,�� Marne Review Discipline Ph®ne Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 Stephen.baluch@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfLgov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@.colliercountyfLgov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 Craig.brown@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations. Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko ' Managing Asst. County Attorne 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfLgov C�Thomas Clarke .Zoning Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime,cook@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Jackie De la Osa North Collier Fire 252-2312 jdelaosa@northcollierfire.com ❑ Mag ie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfLgov Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercount Lgov Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfLgav ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl'.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E.' Engineerin Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfLgov �, ,/ l�}' Cormac Giblin, AICP: Development Review -Planning Mana er 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Princi al Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundiach@colliercount fLgov ❑ Richard Henderlon Zoning Princi a) Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfLgov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineerin Subdivision 252-5757 'ohn.houldsworth@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right-Of-Wa Permitting 252-232b alicia.humphries@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Anita Jenkins Planning &.Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfLgov ❑ John Keliy Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Parker Klopf Zoning Senior Planner 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfLgov (=1 Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane L nch Operations Anal st 252-8243 diane.tynch@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfLgov Updated 1/12/2021 ,, .. ., ,. ,., , ,, ,�� ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 'ack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Develo merit Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capita( Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfGgov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@collercountyfl.gov Derek Perry Assistant Count. Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 Brett.rasenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ ames Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net .Michael Saw er Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 Corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ eter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templetan@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Su ervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercount fl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Buildin Review 252-2962 Jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie�colliercountyfl.gav ❑ Christine. Willou hby Development Review -Zoning 252-5748 Christine.willaughby@colliercountyfl.gov Daniel Zunzune ui North Collier Fire 252-2310 DanieLZunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov �as�u- ht�0��+w Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email GG�✓ �k�ra�tQ.�.� �. /y1v t� 1��jklC� ,�.G- t � t Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 5 of 5 PL20210001103 Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. i - .• Irleparifflem Zoning• Amer site C6 MPUD (PU Planner -Tim Finn Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc. 239-254-2018 • __ .Agent to list. for PL# Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Mantes, Inc. 239-254-2018 • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Amerisite, LLC (Folio #s: 0041.8200007, 00416800001, 00417720009) • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Rezone approx. 19 acres from C-4 to MPUD for property within Mixed Use Activity Center #7 to allow C-4 commercial uses, along with one conditional use (self -storage) as currently approved and one C-5 use (truck rental), and/or up to 16 un/ac for a max. of 303 dwelling units. • Please. list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks. (any thaf applYja See above. • Details about Project: See above Name: Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Title: Vice President Email: paulamcmichael@hmeng.com Phone: 239-254-2018 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercauntVfl Phone: 239-25Z-6866 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collier og v.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a If the property is owned fee simple by an -INDIVIDUAL I tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: i� Name and. Address. % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, percentage of stock owned by each. list the. officers and stockholders and the Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the percentage of interest: Created 9J28J2017 name of a TRUSTEE, list. the beneficiaries of the trust with the Name and Address % of Ownership Page 1 of 3 COLLIER' COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 Nt)RTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX40 (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT fOR PURCHASE, with an individual. or individuals,. a Corporation,. Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve addifiional parties, Fist all individuals or Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28J2017 Page 2 of 3 • * � ,. .� � .,. .. Date of option: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 �239j 252-2400 FAX: (239j 252.6358 Date option terminates:. , or Anticipated closing date: Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this 'farm. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding. party, must beA disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package.. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please printy Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 a1.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col I iercou nty.gov ttal e,, PUD Rezone�. Amendment o ,, < < r� of Administrative Code El PUD to PUD Rezone� Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be ufiilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at tune: of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.coliiercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. 4. REQUIREMENTS COPIES EQfUIRE L REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ,� Envlronmental Data°°Requirements pursuant to C section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ f ] ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less, than 12 months old. Inclutle copies of previous surveys: 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study - f a,� 44 Te , T"Yi+w4._ Wf" &LNIAMAL0 1 ❑ Historical SurveyrrmmmUol 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ [B ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ® ® ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239j 2524400 FAX90 (239) 252-6358 Revised ConceptualMaster Site Plan 24 x 36"and One 8 h" x 11 copy LI] ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement }The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:. ,( Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses _. ,Exhibit Be. Development Standards .t Exhibit Co. Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code 0 Exhibit D: Legal Description E Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit Fee List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe .Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)1.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 590-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS— INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS. School District '(Residential Components), Amy LOckheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fe Parks and Recreation: Barr Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: iRobin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ElCity of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 IN PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre U PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre EJ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environrnental.Dta Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at C Methodology Review: $500.00 .r ��n�a �'�� ''�i�" *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 U014Hty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov tkr Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC; $1,125.00 o BCC:$500.00 1,7 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NA )LES, FLORIDA 34104 (23 3) 252-2400 FAX0 (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all. of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee, Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 To be completed bystaff PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. �, of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. Name of Property Owner(s): Amerisite, LLC, Peter Sulick, MGRM Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 1801 Gulfshore Blvd. N., # 803 City: Naples State: FI ZIP: 34102 Telephone: N/A Cell: N/AFax: N/A E-Mail Address: petersulick1950@gmail.com Name of Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Firm: Hole Montes, Inc Address: State: Encore Way City: Naples state: FI ZIP; 34110 Telephone: 239-254-2000 Cell: N/A Fax: 239-254-2099 E-Mail Address: bobmulhere@hmeng.com, paulamcmichael@hmeng.com Name of Agent: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Firm: Coleman, Yovanovich &Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34103 Telephone: 239-435-3535; Fax: 239435A 218 Email Address: rovanovich@cyklawfirm.com March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 This application is requesting a rezone from: C-4 Zoning districts) to the zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Commercial and Multi -Family Residential Original PUD Name: Ordinance No.: On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer`s certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 14 5os 26E lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes &Bounds Description: S 1/2 of NW1 /4 of SW1 /4 less R/W 9.24 Ac Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 418200007, 416800001 and 417720009 Size of Property: 1,237 ft. x 668 ft. = 825,462 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 18.95-±- Address/ General location of Subject Property: East side of Collier Blvd, North of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑ Commercial ❑Residential ❑Community Facilities ❑Industrial 0 Mixed Use ❑ Other: March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Zoning Land Use N A Undeveloped S Goodturn Center (MPUD) Undeveloped E A North Half Undeveloped/ South Half FPL Site W Collier Blvd (C.R. 951) Arterial ROW If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: _f`J Lot: Plafi Book: Block: Subdivision: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes &Bounds Description: x t i Required: List all registered Home Owner Associations) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www,colliergov.net/index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Naples Lakes Country Club Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 4784 Naples Lakes Blvd. City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34114 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City• State: ZIP: City: State: City• Mailing Address: City: ZIP: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 C�o�u�.�y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercvunty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX; (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. See attached Evaluation Criteria. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. {This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The interns! and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion, h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239j 252-2400 FAX: {239j 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes � No if so please provide copies. This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising signs) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising signs) immediately. Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be inform acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST Name of Applicant(s): Amerisite, LLC Address: 1801 Gulfshore Blvd. N., # 803 city; Naples state: FL ZIP; 34102 Telephone: N/A Cell. N/A Fax; N/A :-Mail Address: petersulickl 950@gmail.com Address of Subject Property (If available): East side of Collier Blvd., north of Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. city: Naples state: FI ZIP; 34114 Section/Township/Range: 1� 50 S / 26E Otto N/A Block: N/A Subdivision. Metes & Bounds Description: S1/2 of NW1/4 of SW1/4 less R/W 9.24 Ac Plat Book: Page M.Property I.D. Number: 418200007, 416800001 and 417720009woondoom Check applicable system: a. County Utilifiy System [] b. City Utility System ❑ c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: South County Water Reclamation Facility (SCWRF) ❑ d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): Check applicable system: a. County Utility System 0 b. City Utility System ❑ c. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: south County Regional Water Treatment Plant d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: 303 Dwelling Units; 70,000 SF shopping center; 85,000 SF mini -warehouse Pealc and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 151,479 GPD Average Daily: 116,522 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 124,845 GPD Average Daily: 83,230 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: Unknown March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 Estimated Sewage Project Capacity -RESIDENTIAL Type of Establishment # Units Occupancy - persons/unit* Total Occupancy Flow Per Capita* Total Average Daily Total Average Daily Total Average Daily Peak hour flow Peak hour flow (A) (B) (AxB) (GPD) Flow per Unit (GPD) Flow (GPD) (CxD) Flow (GPM) (GPD) (GPM) (C) (D) (BxD) (G) (G/1440) (G*PF) (H*PF) (F) (H) (I) (K) S.F. or M.F. Dwelling Unit* 303 IS 758 100 250 75750 52.6 293496 2018 *100 gal/day per person and 2.5 people per household = 250 GPD per residential unit Per Collier County Design Criteria, Part 2 Wastewater Collection and Transmission Systems 4 + (P)"z P= 758 (total occupancy / 1000) Peal< Factor (PF) - 3.9 *Peak factor calculation per Inc Standards. Estimated Sewage Project Capacity -COMMERCIAL Type of Establishment # Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Airport, bus terminal, train stations, port & dock facilities, bathroom waste 4 0 only (PER PASSENGER) Airport, bus terminal, train stations, port & dock facilities, bathroom waste 15 0 only (ADD PER EMPLOYEE PER 8 HR SHIFT) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Barber & beauty shop (PER SERVICE 75 0 CHAIR) TOTAL 0 0.00 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Bowling Alley bathroom waste only (PER LANE) 50 0 TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Fiow (GPD) Country Club 100 0 (PER RESIDENT) Country Club 25 0 (ADD PER MEMBER OR PATRON) Country Club 15 0 (ADD PER EMPLOYEE PER 8 HR SHIFT) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Doctor and Dentist office 250 0 (PER PRACTITIONER) Doctor and Dentist office 15 0 (ADD PER EMPLOYEE PER 8 HR SHIFT) TOTAL 0 0 Tvae of Establishment 44Units � Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) � Calculated Flow (GPD) � Factories, exclusive of industrial waste gallons per employee per 8 hr shift 15 0 (NO SHOWERS) Factories, exclusive of industrial waste gallons per employee per 8 hr shift 25 0 (SHOWERS PROVIDED) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flaw (GPD) Flea Market open 3 or LESS days per week 15 0 (PER NON-FOOD SERVICE VENDOR SPACE) Flea Market open 3 or LESS days per week (ADD PER FOOD SERVICE USING SINGLE 50 0 SERVICE ARTICLES ONLY PER 100 SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE Flea Market open 3 or LESS days per week 25 0 (PER LIMITED FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT) Flea Market open MORE than 3 days per week 30 0 (PER NON-FOOD SERVICE VENDOR SPACE) Flea Market open MORE than 3 days per week (ADD PER FOOD SERVICE USING SINGLE 100 0 SERVICE ARTICLES ONLY PER 100 SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE Flea Market open MORE than 3 days per week 50 0 (PER LIMITED FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Restaurant opening 16 hrs or less per day 0 40 0 (PER SEAT) Restaurant opening more than 16 hrs per day 60 0 (PER SEAT) Restaurant using single service articles only and operating 16 hrs or less per 20 0 day PER SEAT Restaurant using single service articles only and operating 16 hrs or less per 35 0 day PER SEAT Bar and cocktail lounge 20 0 PER SEAT Bar and gaming lounge 15 0 (PER POOLTABLE) Drive-in restaurant 50 0 PER CAR SPACE Carry -out only, including caterers 50 0 (PER 100 SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Carry -out only, including caterers 15 0 (ADD PER EMPLOYEE PER 8 HR SHIFT) Institutions 5 0 (PER MEAL Food Outlets excluding delis, bakery, or meat dpt 10 0 PER 100 SO FT OF FLOOR SPACE Food Outlets DELI 40 0 (ADD PER 100 SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Food Outlets BAKERY 40 (ADD PER 100 SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Food Outlets MEAT OPT E 75 E 0 (ADD PER 100 SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Food Outlets 200 0 (ADD PER WATER CLOSET) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP {F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Hotels & Matels 0 100 0 (REGULAR PER ROOM) Hotels & Motels (RESORT HOTELS, CAMPS, COTTAGES 200 0 PER ROOM) Hotels & Motels (WITH SELF SERVICE LAUNDRY 750 0 FACILITIES PER MACHINE TOTAL 0 0 Type o4 Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Mobile Home Park (PER SINGLE WIDE MOBILE HOME SPACE, LESS THAN 4 SINGLE WIDE 250 0 SPACES CONNECTED TO A SHARED ONSITE SYSTEM Mobile Home Park (PER SINGLE WIDE MOBILE HOME SPACE, 4 OR MORE SINGLE WIDE 225 0 SPACES CONNECTED TO A SHARED ONSITE SYSTEM Mobile Home Park (PER DOUBLE WIDE MOBILE HOME SPACE,LESS THAN 4 DOUBLE WIDE 300 0 SPACES CONNECTED TO A SHARED ONSITE SYSTEM) Mobile Home Park (PER DOUBLE WIDE MOBILE HOME SPACE, 4 OR MORE DOUBLE WIDE 275 0 SPACES CONNECTED TO A SHARED Type of Establishment# #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Office building 1 15 15 (PER EMPLOYEE PER 8 HR SHIFT) * use whichever is greater (do not sum flows) To ca Service Stations per water closet 325 0 (OPEN MORE THAN 16 HRS PER DAY) Shopping Center without food or laundry 70000 0A 7000 PER SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Stadiums, race tracks, ball parks 4 0 TOTAL � 70000 � � 7000� Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Stores 0 200 0 (PER BATHROOM) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Swimming and bathing facilities, public PER PERSON 10 0 TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD} Theaters and Auditoriums 4 PER SEAT TOTAL 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Veterinary Clinic 250 0 (PER PRACTITIONER) Veterinary Clinic (ADD PER EMPLOYEE PER 8 HR SHIFT) 15 0 Veterinary Clinic 20 0 (ADD PER KENNEL, STALL OR CAGE) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD} Warehouse 2 15 30 (ADD PER EMPLOYEE PER 8 HR SHIFT) Assumed Assumed SS,000 SF tivould yield a maximum of 670 units * Add 1 gallon for each 2 units or fraction thereof, for over 200 units and shall be in addition to employees, offices or living quarters Type of Establishment # Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Warehouse - units over 200 235 1 235 *Assumed 0.1 GPD / SF Assumed Total Calculated Total Peak Hour Flow Total Peak Hour Flow Average Daily Flow Peak Factor (GPD) I (GPM) (GPD) 7480 4.28 1 31985 22.2 Estimated Sewage Project Capacity -INSTITUTIONAL Type of Establishment # Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Churches - includes kitchen with NO meals prepared on daily basis 3 0 (PER SEAT) Churches - includes kitchen WITH meals prepared on daily basis 5 0 (PER MEAL) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Hospitals - does not include kitchen 200 0 (PER BED) Hospitals -WITH kitchen 200 0 (PER BED) Hospitals- WITH kitchen 5 0 (PER MEAL) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Nursing, rest homes, adult congregate living facilities - does not include kitchen 100 0 (PER BED) Nursing, rest homes, adult congregate living facilities- WITHkitchen 0 100 0 PER BED Nursing, rest homes, adult congregate living facilities - WITH kitchen 0 5 0 (PER MEAL) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Parks, public picnic- WITH toilets 4 0 (PER PERSON) Parks, public picnic - WITH bathhouse, showers & toilets 10 0 (PER PERSON) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Public Institutions other than schools and hospitals - does not include kitchen 100 0 (PER PERSON) Public Institutions other than schools and hospitals - WITH kitchen 100 0 (PER PERSON) Public Institutions other than schools and hospitals - WITH kitchen 5 0 (PER MEAL) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Schools - Day type (PER PERSON) 10 0 Schools - Day type - WITH showers (PER PERSON) 4 0 Schools - Day type - WITH cafeteria (PER PERSON) 4 0 Schools - Day type - day school workers (PER PERSON) 15 0 Schools - Boarding type (PER PERSON) 75 0 TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Work/construction camps, semi- permanent 50 0 (PER PERSON) TOTAL 0 0 Type of Establishment #Units Sewage Flow GDP (F.A.C.) Calculated Flow (GPD) Other 0 0 TOTAL 0 1 0 Total Calculated Average peak Factor Total Peak Hour Flow (GPD) Total Peak Hour Flow Daily Flow (GPD) (GPM) 0 4.50 0 0.0 Grand Totals Total Calculated Average Peak Factor Total Peak Hour Flow (GPD) Total Peak Hour Flow Daily Flow (GPD) (GPM) 83230 325481 226.0 Final Calcs GPD Water - Peak 151,478.60 Avg. Daily 116,522.00 Sewer- Peak 124,845.00 Avg. Daily 83,230.00 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Collier County Public Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs, as well as wastewater service. The subject property is within the South Service Area. Collier County Public Utilities has sufficient capacity to provide water and sewer. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the projecfi is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 e oy COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPI,E5, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliiercounty.gov (239) 2524400 FAX: (239) 2524359 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or of#irm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record ofproperty commonly known as Folio Nos. 419200007, 418000001 and 417720009, Naples, FL 34112 (street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Mixed -use planned unit development ( M PUD) zoning. We hereby designate P'McMichaal,6.Mulhele,R,Yovanovich. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property In the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site, These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned. unit development rezoning. 2, The legal representative identified herein Is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to and recorded by Collier County, 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code, 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions., 5, So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses.to occupy or use any part of the planned unit develop ent and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms condj0on?MMsafggivarcLs 9/the planned unit development. owner" PETER SULICK, MGRM Printed Name AMERISITE, LLC STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Owner Printed Name The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of•�p'hysical presence or®online notarization this day of I _� 20�� by (printed name of owner or qualifier) PeTERsuuctc; MGRM Such persons) Notary Public must check applicable box, wMe Are personally known to me W�f �fV'r��T6PNANIE KAROL Has produced a current drivers licenseNotary Public • State of Florida �Nas produced as identification.* yComnlEIfe16 F 9820Y4 M Co Notary Signatu March 4, 2020 Id through National Notary Assn. 11 Page 8 of LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP SO SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 03°12'59" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 1,007.29 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14, SOUTH 89055'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, THE SAME BEING A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL; THENCE NORTH 03°12'59" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID HENDERSON CREEK CANAL, A DISTANCE OF 667.53 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID HENDERSON CREEK CANAL, NORTH 89057'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,236.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03°14'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 670.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°55'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,236.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 825,633 SQUARE FEET OR 18.954 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LL �:o�.�.ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.calliercaunty.gav 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239j 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-635$ The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercou ntyf I.gov/Home/ShawDocument?id=76983. RECZUI�EMENTS # Ci>F ... REC�UIR�D � NUT .. '.. ;._CORIES _ _ .... :REQUIRED . Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of 1 0 ❑ why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments (download Iatestversion) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 � ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed{s) 1 Q ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Q ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Q Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, F�UCFCS Codes with legend included 1 Q ❑ on aerial. Statement of Utility Provisions 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement {EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with ❑ � ❑ project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include -copies 1 ❑ ❑ of previous surveys. Traffic Impact Study 1 0 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ 0 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F {see below for additional information)+ ❑ Q ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this ❑ 0 ❑ document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24 x 36"and One 8 %" x 11 copy ❑ ❑ Q Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ 0 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Q Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ Q *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: � Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit Be. Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description [ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and Justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use} Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)1.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components}: Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Q Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District. ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: [� Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre [� Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: i Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: CCPC: $1,125.00 BCC: $500900 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSE5HOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the St" and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20°° of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, VP Printed named of signing party Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL-20210001103 & P1:-2021�001104 I, PETER SUIiCK (print name), as MGRM (title, if applicable) of AMERISITE, Li.0 (company, if applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner Qapplicant =contract.purchaser=and that; 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approvai(s) requested and to impose. covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the .County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action, 5. Well authorize Paula N.C. McMichael, RobertJ. Where and Richard YOVanovich to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition Including 9 through 2 above, *Nofes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L,C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member," • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership, • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be Identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership, • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., Individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under pen ies of perjury, i declare that i have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts t ed i it ar ignature —Date PETER SULICK, MGRM, AMERISITE, LLC STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical ��'' day of � U �i,�._..,.._, 20 �I, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) ,_ Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me 71 Has produced a current drivers license 1714 Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: r CR108-COA-00115\155 R1EV 3/4/2020 or, ®online notarization this Nu�cary Seal STEPHANiE KAROL Iotary Public - State of Eiarida Commission N GG 965839 ' y Comm. Expires Mar Q, cou through National Notary Assn, FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PETER SULICK applicable) of AMERISITE, LLC AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION PL-20210001103 & PL-20210001104 (print name), as MGRM (title, If under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner (company, If a plicable},w sear or affirm applicant=contract purchaserF7and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Paula N.C. McMichael, Robert J. Mulhere and Richard Yovanovich to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.). then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under pena�ies of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts St ed i it /Zo I ignature Date PETER SULICK, MGRM, AMERISITE, LLC STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of "physical presence or 0 online notarization this �f%'' day of �' (� , 20 21, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) � �-U SU � tC l(.. Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: -Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license IQ Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: '1a`Y'�a•••. STEPHANIE KAROL �: •�� Notary Public -State of Florida . ••''�oFJ.ole`.� Commission N GG 965839 My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 Bonded through National Notary Assn, CP\08-COA-001151155 R)"V 3/4/2020 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. if the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net d. If the property is in the general and/or limited 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 name of a GENERAL. or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Amerisite, LLC 1801 Gulfshore Boulevard North #803, Naples, FL 34102 Peter Sulick, MGRM (88%) Patricia Sulick Tuohy (6%), Peter Sulick III (6%) e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f. C� Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or Date subject property acquired Leased.* Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierRov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE ORIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing. date: Any petitian required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, i attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed applfcatfon, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 AgentJOwner Signature. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President Agent/Owner Name (please print) 7-12-2021 Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 u Return ta; UDWEST TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF FLORIDA 3936 N. Tamiami Trail, Suite A Napla. FL 34103 (941)262-2163 343WJB �. 1 4 TH18 W Larry McMahon and 5553,575.00 S 15900 3875.20 2582661 OR: 2632 PG; 1365 uca m ut on2cliu um st emu cowls, n 11/19/2011 4t 11:2Six HIM i& not cut Cm ss M40 at m ISO" WC-411 3115.21 u�ta; IIIWti! tItLl lICI 1! made the ,�_ day of _, �,Q 0 o by 1�tMahon, husband and wife hereinafter called the grantor, to _,.,:.-.:.;. affiilte, LLC hereinafter called the grantee, whose pps 3295 Ft. Charles Dri (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" air legal tepr+esenbtivea and assigns of individwls, s, W['RV)LSSETH: That the grantor, for and irr condderatioas, receipt whereof is hereby ackrrowkd� c mveys and confirms unto the grantees an that certain No: 00417720009) be FL 34102 include all the patties to this instrument and the heirs, �ssors and assigns of corporations.) South otyahalf (S 1/2) of the North one-half (N 1/2) of the`I�isS (SW 1/4) of the Southwest orta-quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 14,�T bang in Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet for right of of the sum of $10.00 aad other valuable nts, bargains, sells, assigns, remises, releases, Collier County, Florida, viz. (Folio (3taa0or slather warrants that the subject property is not the grantor's p�aperty is vacant land. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the name is fee aittrplc forever. (N 1/2) of the Southwest oat -quarter South, Range 26 East, all lying and property, in fact the subject or in anywise AND the grantor hereby covenants with said graatoe that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land is fee sittaple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby folly warran<s the title w said land and will defend the saau against site lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1999, and eunneuts, restrictions and reservations of record, and easements and restrictions common to the subdivision. e OR: 2632 PG; 1366 IN WITNB5S WHEREOF, the undersigned has aigaed and sealed these presents the day and year that above written, aeakd and delivered in STATE OF: COUNTY O The foregoing Ms. it: , as acknowledged before me this 4day of by Jean Me lip produced sa identification. My t;,pmission Expires N �? i o Z ARCCurl ame be ow) , • •..�•�' {urAY I Is•is, Notary Public. C! ,! , Y � ) S � met ^See l Uffalk runty As dosea _ is sees ' Ae, W ;, es 110 00. VoF so [1 OR; 2632 PG: 1367 *** Dodd Con't The North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 Eat. CoUter County, Florida COUNTY OFCol i i er « .. a ,� i _l wcwiw To rRErARCR: �'�` 'Ibb itattuatwnt prepared by James D. Vogel, �q.. -. MID%= TITLE GUARANTEE COMMANY OF FLORIDA. 3936 No. Tamiami Trail, Napka, FL 34103. (941)262-2163, in conjunction WI t of title insurance. J .� _� .� ,..,. ., � -.. :. � .- • TH18 WARRANTY OEED Made this 6th day Of JuM, 20pt by Wayne 0, 281128� OR: 2842 PG: 42�9 u1:01010 ie Oif ICIAI� Ul'OtD! of tOf�111 t01Rt, tt lill�it!!1 �t a:tiw tr�prf t. tuoc�, civet C011 111121.N uc nt 1l.S4 D0�•,11 ilii.4! >l�q: gIA>mif>r tit61 itttICt: �Ot! tlCi R married man, joined by Fatima Smith, hla wife whose post office ttidfis1��1�' ;.�5 � W �l �'�..� ,. , tlMeirt alter tatted the grar�ti)r` �„`•�\ Amerlalte, t1C, An Oh i,aiti�d t.lablilty Company wtwse post otNce addross is: ,;, . _ :._.��_; i \. ,�:, S;/ ; twatndtar catiad the grantee: (wtterwer used herein the farms npreaentatAh►s and assigns of ins WtTNE88ETH; That the grantor, for and wherrM k hereby a»rknowladged, hereby grants. tllat certain land skuaN M Lee County, Fbtida: The North one -halt {N 1I2) of the North of iouthweet one -quarter {8W t/4) of the Township 60 South, Range Zd Eut, 4e Records of Collier County, Florida. TtDOETMER wkh a1i the tanarnants, heredNan+enb and TO HAVE ANO TO HOt.D, the same h tee simple forever. r�ciude all Me parties to this hstrument and the heirs. tegai us and assigns of corporatbns) of the tum of StO.t'>D and other valuable considerations, recNpt aMens, remises, nteases, conveys and contkms unb the grantee, aft 1/Z) of the North one -halt (N 1/3 of the �t one -quarter {SW 1 /�) of Section 14, itt 100 feet for roadway, In the Public AIlO the grantor herby covenants wkh said grantee that the grantor k lawtulty a� has good right and Iawlul tuthorky to seN and convey taW land; That the grantor h',_ deNnd the saane agaMst the lawlui claims of all persons whomsoever; and that saici'hr aoautng subsequent to tHcember 3t, Z000, restrictbns, reservatbns and easements of 1N WtTNt:88 WHEREOF, the saW grantor has signed and aeaiad these presents the gigned, sealed and deaverad h our presence: t"�Me" Brenda A. Curran Also wir,t: _ �----.- Wttr+ees •2 Alto Ptint: :� 0. Smith or h anywise appertartinp. land h fee simpN; That the grantor anants the title to said land and wilt �`nt ail encumbrances, except taxes above wrktar►. G— // 4/ OR; 2842 ?G: 0280 *** STATE CF Fi.ORIDA COUNTY OF Las EXECUTION OF the toregoinq Instrument was acknowledged before me thin _1�____ day of ,,sc , 2DOt by Wayne D. Smith, a married man, Joined by Fatima Smith, his wife , who blare pa/eoe* kr4A to me or who hu produoed sutkient e*iencs of identification (described below) and who did not take an oath. perm"lon of k1enNNoation p(oduced: ('t V:!�� LA"&---•-�- ..... ARY aveuc MCME ,r A, C LI# rra , renda Aribc No Seal)NdfARV NAME cOfNMNNOM NO. CMAMISOM EV. DATE Notary NwAOConvv slon NoAV# Ck = " or printed f LE NO: -. - .-�.� . �., � - .. .. - �: .- . C - - • • THIII< WARRANTY DEED flAade this ath day of ,tune, soot 2811289 OR: 2842 PG; 0282 UC01D10 1� OttICIA1 IICOW o! COLLIit C0111�, tL OII1J12111 it 11:21ri 01Ia'f t. � � C�Stll.11 pC to 15,01 pC•,)i l22S.l0 ua: W11DI11t tltL= i1l1IA1 CO!! f IA Ot by Petry W. Roes, t�s.Trutriee of the Florence 8. Roes Revocebie Trust dated March 30, t9Y1 and NidltflduMly, and Ket 0. Roa trt,oa dtb..edris.�.}i�°`e.:.. . ,:. �, � r, j : � �t�0, �L . wOt��{U. t+.r.trt atw oared tM gnn >.� Mtsrlsfb, L.L.C., tin � Llmitsd Litbility Company _.::.:� . wt+oea post oNbe addnas is: � ��- 0 (L,l. � h,r l c S pQ r d 4 '�' ... N �:� �' ,.::.:�:,� � y i � �-. j'r,,- i. hsfsiNAM Oafhd tfre gnrttee: {; ,�,`�:.� ., (wtwrwr used berth the tarma •grantor;•.�a�d •;gr`nta' hclude aU tM partiN t0 this hstrument and the Mirs, Iegal na�w�sasrthtiws and aeslpns of hdhrldwk, u�l� �;`iucasors and asspns of corporatbns) WITNEf$ETH: That the grantor, for and h wftenol is hereby aoknowiedged, hereby grants, h tlraf oaAert Mrtd sibr'ate h Cower County, Florida: The South 1/2 of the South 1 M of the N� Township 60 South, Range Zd Eaat, Collier of the sum of t)it).00 and other vakeabie conaideratbns, ncetpt il�t►:, remises, reNases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee. all TH18 i8 VACANT PROPERTY AND 18 NOT CONTIGUOUS TO ANY HOMESTEAD OF THE tiRi TOGETHER wkh all the ter►ernents, heredkaments and appurtenances TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same h Ne slmpta forever. of the 8outhwea3 1!4 of Section 1 �. VER HAS BEEN, AND IS NOT �,-.; � ti ,'`'�, , >'ba�hq or h anywise appertahhq. .; AND tM grantor hereby Covenants wkh said grantee !fiat the grantor h kwfuMy sei:ed'ro his good right and iawlul authorky to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby deNnd the same agahst the lawful clah►s of ak parsons whomsoever; and that sakS land acauhg subsequent to December 3t, �000, restriotbn:, nservatbns and tasen+snis of n iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bald grantor has slpned and sealed theca presents the day and r� Perry h tee shtipN; that the grantor s the tkM to acid land and will ..�""LI"""■ t .�.: except taxes oR: 2842 Mc: 0283 EXECUTION OF the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of vJ110 t!► , 2001 by Perry W. Ross, as Trustee of the Florence B. Ross Revocable Trust dated March gQ, 1971 and hdlridually, and Ileaealh.Nei�, who is/are personalty known to me or who has produced sufficient evidence of l lantifloation (descrbed below) and who did not take an oath. Dgcrtption of WentMicatlon produced: PU6UC lIOTARI► NAfME "OFFICIAL SEAL" iE )IS b2 Notary NamalCommksbn Nr FILE N0: Og30a7H BATC H.000 Signed, sealed and delivered in ou MATE OF i.,La► Opt S _.11 c0UM OFF: - EXECUTION Of the foragohp hstrument was iol ii0.R3I who isl+re pars%"OMWT known to fne Or who who did not take an oath, - typed or printed before me this 'rS!!Lo day o144". 2001 by KENNETH G. d sufficlent ovkM o of kkniftation (described below) and M GggGO1GNE STATE OF ILLINOIS ; Y + EXPIRES 6174; 2001 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.Colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD Addressing@colliergov,net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section, PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist foreach Pefition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) 0 PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property a properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Section 14, Township 50S, Range 26 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00418200007,00416800001 and 00417720009 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-S724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: (� Email Applicant Name: Paula McMichael, AICP, Vice President, S Phone: 239-254-2018 ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up nie Karol, Permitting Coordinator Email/Fax: stephaniekarol@hmeng.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitu#e Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division, FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number A roved b : � �! / • 05/19/2021 pp Y Date. Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev, 6/9/2017 page 2 of 2 m 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 Phone:(239)254-2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization No.1772 It PROJECT SITE: 19.00t ACRES* 411 ACREAGE = 0.40 740 ACREAGE = 18.60 *AREA TAKEN FROM COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER AMERISITE CB MPUD FLU CCS MAP EXHIBIT D novso vamm�srxurnon ��«: s��xEo nEiow: 2021.043 MST vnoreer xo.: 2021,043 sneErno.: 1 of 1 onrE AMERISITE CB MPUD REZONF. NARRATIVE STATEMENT, LDC EVALUATION CRITERIA AND GMP CONSISTENCY I, Introduction The subject property is comprised of 19 acres and is located off C.R. 951 at A Better Way, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the intersection of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. There is an existing point of ingress/egress off C.R. 951 at A Better Way. The property is currently zoned C4 with an approved conditional use for self -storage and located within the Mixed Use Activity Center #7 and Urban Residential Fringe future land use designations. The east 170 feet of the subject property contains a F.P.L and R/W Easement. Currently, the property remains undeveloped. The applicant intends to rezone the property from C-4 to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) with a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA). The MPUD rezone and GMPA seek to maintain the uses permitted by the existing C4 district and add truck rental and leasing, a gas station, and to permit 303 multi -family residential dwelling units. II. History of Property The property was previously zoned C-3 (parcel 00418200007) and C-5 (parcels 0U416000001 and 00417720009) and were collectively rezoned to C-4 in 2014 with Ordinance 14-28. The property was also subject to a GMPA to reconfigure the boundary and increase the size of the northeast quadrant of Activity Center #7 by 9.24 acres, subsequently including the entire property within the Activity Center #7 (Ordinance 2014- 27). In 2013, the property was also approved for a Conditional Use to allow for indoor conditioned self -storage buildings (Resolution 2014-152). The Conditional Use has not yet been developed but has received the appropriate extensions to continue to allow for this use. III. LDr, Evaluation Criteria A. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The 19-acre property is zoned C4, and allows for a variety of general commercial uses, along with the approved conditional use for an indoor air-conditioned self -storage facility. The proposed PUD rezone seeks to permit a mix of multi -family residential and commercial uses. The property is located within Mixed Use Activity Center #7, which is comprised of approximately 197.5 acres around the intersection of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Page 1 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 2-8-2022).docx Hammock Road. Activity Center #7 includes a variety of Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) that allow for various uses that include commercial, hotel, office, residential, and assisted living facilities. The adjacent zoning to the south, The Good Turn Center MPUD, permits up to 100,000 square feet of commercial land uses and slcilied nursing care facilities with a maximum of 200 units (21 dwelling units per acre). The Hammock Parlc MPUD, located south of The Good Turn MPUD at the intersection of C.R 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, permits a mix of commercial uses and up to 265 multi -family dwelling units. The Hacienda Lalces MPUD is a 2,262-acre project located at the southeast corner of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road and extends east of the subject property. The Hacienda Lalces MPUD permits up to 327,500 square feet of retail commercial area, 70,000 square feet of business park or education facility, and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units consisting of a variety of housing types. The addition ofmulti-family residential units to this site through the MPUD rezone will accomplish the intent of the Mixed Use Activity Centers to provide an integrated mix of land uses with access to the transportation network and public infrastructure. Given the mix of uses to the south of the proposed MPUD, and the lower density residential development to the east (Hacienda Lakes MPUD), the addition of the multi -family residential uses will provide a transition of intensity from a higher density multi -family residential development close to the arterial roadway to the lower density single-family development further east within the Hacienda Lalces MPUD. Due to the location of the property along C.R. 951, there is an existing direct access point to the arterial roadway and there will be direct access to water, sewer, and other utilities, further establishing this site as well -suited for commercial, residential, or mixed use development. The application materials demonstrate adequate capacity on the adjacent roadway network and available public utilities. B. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The property is under the ownership of a single entity as evidenced by the ownership documents provided by with PUD rezone application. Arrangements will be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such facilities that are not provided or maintained at public expense through an association. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -District, policy or other provision allows the requested Page 2 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 2-8-2022).docx uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub - District, policy or other provision.) 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict. A companion GMPA application has been submitted to amend the subdistrict to ensure compliance between the GMP and the MPUD zoning. Assuming the proposed GMPA is approved, the MPUD will be consistent with all applicable GMP Goals, Objections and Policies. 2. Compliance with additional GMP provisions. Policy 4.7 -Access Management Plan provisions have been developed for Mixed Use and Interchange Activity Centers designated on the Future Land Use Map and these provisions have been incorporated into the Collier County Land Development Code. The intent of the Access Management Plan provisions is defined by the following guidelines and principles: a. The number of ingress and egress points shall be minimized and shall be combined and signalized to the maximum extent possible. b. Spacing of access points shall meet, to the maximum extent possible, the standards set forth in the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 01-247, adopted June 26, 2001). c. Access points and turning movement shall be located and designed to minimize interference with the operation of existing and planned interchanges and intersections. d. Developers of lots, parcels, and subdivisions shall be encouraged to dedicate cross -access easements, rights -of --way, and limited access easements, as necessary and appropriate, in order to ensure compliance It the above -mentioned standards (a. The proposed MPUD has one, existing, ingress and egress point from C.R. 951 and this will serve as the primary access point. This access was constructed as a bridge over the canal that runs parallel to C.R. 951. The remaining areas of the development are landlocked by undeveloped properties under separate ownership, ill provide for the location of potential interconnection to The proposed MPUD w the PUD to the south (The Good Turn PUD). An existing access easement (OR 5705, PG 148) is located on the southwest corner of The Good Turn PUD (off C.R. 951). This recorded access easement will also serve as an interconnection with the Hammock Park MPUD and The Good Turn PUD and will serve as the Page 3 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 2-8-2022).docx Hammock Parlc PUD project entry, as identified on the Hammock Park Master Plan (Ordinance 2020-039). Policy 5.6 —New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 0441, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended.) The MPUD's proposed commercial and residential uses will be compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses that include a mix of various residential types, commercial uses, and assisted living facilities. Policy 7.1 -The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The subject property has an existing connection to arterial roadway C.R. 951. Policy 7.2 -The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Given the site size, there will be limited ability to create additional internal accesses or loop roads. However, the property will be developed in a manner that will not place an additional congestion on nearby collector or arterials roadways. Policy 7.3 -All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The MPUD's Master Plan illustrates a potential future interconnection with the property to the south. The property to the south also has a planned location for a potential interconnection to the development to the south, which will have access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Policy 7.4 -The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The MPUD will add to the mix of commercial uses and residential housing types and densities within Activity Center #7 providing for additional commercial and housing options for the area. Within walking distance, less than one-half mile of the subject property, there are neighborhood services such as a grocery store, gas station and convenience store, restaurants, and dry cleaners. Page 4 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 2-8-2022).docx Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Goal 6: To identify, protect, conserve and appropriately use native vegetative communities and wildlife habitat. Objective 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area... native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria. Coastal Hi h Hazard Area Non -Coastal Hi h Hazard Area Residential and Mixed Less than 2.5 acres 10% Less than 5 acres 10% Use Development Equal to or greater than Equal to or greater than 5 acres 2.5 acres 25% and less than 20 acres 15% Equal to or greater than 20 ac. 25% Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered. The site is zoned commercial and has an approved PPL that required the retention 0.40 acres of preserve centrally located on the site, with no connections Lou off -site preserves or vegetated areas. The property has since been cleared except for the existing, designated, preserve area. The companion MPUD rezone requests the option to relocate the existing, fragmented, preserve area to an off -site area, as prescribed by the LDC. All impacts have already occurred, and no new impacts are proposed. D. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The property was previously approved for a rezone from the C-3 and C-5 zoning districts to the C-4 zoning district. During that rezone process several conditions were put in place through the approved Ordinance 14-28. The conditions include the following: floor area restrictions on several uses, prohibiting certain uses typically associated with C4 permitted uses, additional site design standards for landscape buffering and required setbacks, and time limitations for the use of amplified sound. Page 5 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 2-8-2022).docx The commercial use conditions are included in the proposed TV-1-PUD, continuing the previously confirmed external and internal compatibility. The addition %J the multi -family residential uses will continue the mixed -use development pattern within the Mixed Use Activity Center #7 and is therefore compatible with the external land uses. The MPUD will integrate the allowed commercial uses with the multi -family residential uses in a manner that ensure internal compatibility. E. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed MPUD will provide adequate usable open space. F. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The county charges impact fees (or similar fees) to ensure that there is funding to make any necessary capacity improvements related to sewer and water services, roads, public schools, government buildings including jails, regional and community parks, EMS, libraries, and law enforcement. The developer will be responsible for the cost of any site -related improvements, including but not limited to access improvements and conveyance related improvements to the water and/or sewer distribution system. There will be a requirement to demonstrate "concurrency" at the time of future subdivision plats or Site Development Plans) for this project. (The concurrency process ensures that the County has the capacity for Category "A" public facilities and services at the time that project related impacts will affect (require) such services and facilities.) Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in the various elements of the Collier County GMP, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. G. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. There are no issues that would limit the ability of the subject property or the surrounding areas to accommodate this project. H. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The PUD conforms to the LDC regulations, or contains deviations there from, where appropriate. Page 6 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 2-8-2022).docx 10.02.08.F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08.E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. A companion GMPA application has been made to amend the Mixed Use Activity Center subdistrict to ensure compliance between the GMP and the MPUD zoning. Assuming the proposed GMPA is approved, the MPUD will be consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) goals, objectives, and policies, and Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and the goals, objectives and policies as applicable, of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. The proposed rezone is compatible with the existing land use pattern which is a mixture of agriculture zoning and residential, commercial, and mixed use PUDs. However, property that is located approximately 1,000 feet to the north, and a property located 350 feet to the east contains residential development. The adjacent zoning to the south, The Good Turn Center MPUD, permits commercial land uses and skilled nursing care facilities with a maximum of 200 units (21 dwelling units per acre). Further south, at the NE intersection of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the Hammock Park MPUD has also being approved for a mixture of commercials uses and 265 multi -family dwelling units. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. This rezoning will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. hether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existi Wng conditions in the neighborhood. Existing boundaries were not illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions in the neighborhood. Page 1 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 2-7-2022).docx 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary, The market analysis demonstrates a need for the proposed housing types. This site is located in close proximity to major collector/arterial roadways (C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock) and is within the Mixed Use Activity Center #7 thus providing a suitable location for a mixture of residential and commercial uses. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Development standards proposed ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The requested change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The site will be designed to meet all County and SFWMD requirements. No drainage problems will be created. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development standards and perimeter buffers assure the proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent The proposed change will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 2-7-2022).docx 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The requested MPUD rezoning will allow for both commercial and residential uses in an area suitable for such uses, as the property is near similar development. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use; however, the proposed development is the highest and best use of this property as it is adjacent to existing commercial and residential development, has access to Collier Boulevard (an arterial). 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which TV ould be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification is typical of and not different from any other similar development in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There is availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to serve the project. Page 3 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 2-7-2022).docx 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Additional factors to consider during review of a rezone petition for a project, or portion thereof, within an activity center are as follows: a. Rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. There shall be no minimum acreage limitation for such Planned Unit Developments except all requests for rezoning must meet the minimum requirements for rezoning in the LDC. The subject rezone is in the form of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. b. The amount, type and location of existing zoned commercial land, and developed commercial uses, both within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two road miles of the Mixed Use Activity Center. The proposed MPUD includes commercial uses that are existing, permitted uses in the underlying zoning district and two additional commercial uses that are not currently permitted within the underlying zoning district. The two additional commercial uses are gasoline service stations, and truck rental and leasing, without drivers: • Gasoline Service Station: There is one existing gasoline service station within the MUAC that includes 16 fuel pumps and 5,411 sq. ft. of convenience store floor area. There are no other gasoline service stations with within two road miles of the MUAC. • Truck Rental and Leasing, without drivers: There are no existing truck rental and leasing establishments within the MUAC, nor withing 2 miles of the MUAC. The companion SSGMPA (PL20210001104) provides a Market Analysis that addresses the two additional commercial uses in relation to this rezone criteria. c. Market demand and service area for the proposed commercial land uses to be used as a guide to explore the feasibility of the requested land uses. The current zoning on the property allows for commercial uses. The PUD Rezone proposes truck rental and leasing, without drivers, and gasoline service stations in addition to the commercial uses that are currently permitted. The companion SSGMPA provides a Market Analysis that indicates that the gasoline market demand is anticipated to grow 10.37% over the next 5 years within the subject projects drive time market area. The proposed gas station will increase the same gasoline market drive time supply by 7.29%. 06 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 2-7-2022).docx The Market Analysis also indicates that the 5-year growth potential within 5 miles of the potential truck rental services location is substantial enough to support truck rental services. Further, the site is suitable for sizeable truck rental services given its location along a major 64ane arterial that is a major north -south connector between I-75 and U. S . 41 East. d. Existing patterns of land use within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two radial miles. The existing land use patterns within the Mixed tJse Activity Center include a mix of approved Planned Unit Developments that permit a range of uses including residential, commercial retail, office, hotel, and assisted living facilities. Within two radial miles of the Mixed Use Activity Center there are residential developments that range in density and minimum lot sizes, a commercial shopping center, medical facilities, a hospital, a higher education facility (Florida Southwestern State College), and undeveloped Agricultural Zoned lands. Please see the Market Analysis reports submitted with the companion SSGMPA. e. Adequacy of infrastructure capacity, particularly roads. The subject property is serviced by adequate public facilities and has an existing access off C.R. 951. f. Compatibility of the proposed development within and adequacy of buffering for, adjoining properties. The proposed development is compatible with the adjoining properties and will have adequate landscape buffers consistent with the requirements of LDC Section 4.06.00. g. Natural or man-made constraints. There are no natural or man-made constraints to the subject site that would prevent the rezoning to a PUD. h. Rezoning criteria identified in the Land Development Code. All rezoning criteria identified in the LDC has been addressed. i. Conformance with Access Management Plan provisions for Mixed Use Activity Centers, as contained in the Land Development Code. The proposed development will adhere to all requirements of the LDC, except where a deviation from the LDC has been approved. Page 5 of 6 H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 2-7-2022).docx j. Coordinated traffic flow on -site and off -site, as may be demonstrated by a Traffic Impact Analysis, and site plan/master plan indicating on -site traffic movements, access point locations and type, median opening locations and type on the abutting roadways, location of traffic signals on the abutting roadways, and internal and external vehicular and pedestrian interconnections. Coordinated traffic flow on -site and off -site has been achieved by demonstrating on the master plan the existing access for the development and the potential interconnection to the property to the south. There is an existing median cut/turn land providing access to the site from the southbound lanes of C.R. 951. k. Interconnections for pedestrians, bicycles and motor vehicles with existing and future abutting projects. The PUD master plan demonstrates the existing pedestrian pathway along C.R. 951, and the interconnection of that pathway to the subject site. Additionally, the master pIan shows the location of a potential interconnection to the undeveloped property to the south. 1. Conformance with the architectural design standards as identified in the Land Development Code. The development will be required to adhere to all LDC required architectural design standards, as no deviations to these standards are being requested. H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Second Resubmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 2-7-2022).docx AMERISITE CB MPUD DEVIATIONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS 1. Deviation No. Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1, which states the maximum floor area ratio for ALF/Group Housing shall not exceed 0.45, to instead allow for a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. Justification: This deviation is requested to allow for more floor area for group housing projects, as these projects proved a significant range of recreational amenities, which Men provided within the building increase the total square footage of the structure, thus increasing the FAR. Newergroup housing projects also provide for larger interior living spaces, necessitating a larger FAR. H:\2021\2021043\WP\PUDZ\Resubmittal\Deviations and Justifications (11-5-2021).docx 140"rict School r� Collier Coves Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [�1] type of application request (one only): [X] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, Project Name: Amerisite CB MPUD Municipality: Collier Count Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 418200007, 416800001, and 417720009 Location/Address of subject property: The subject property is comprised of 18.95± acres and is located on the east side of C.R. 951/Collier Boulevard, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the intersection of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road Closest Major Intersection: CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road II. Ownership/Agent Information: Applicant Name(s): Amerisite, LLC/Peter Sulick, MGRM Agent/Contact Person: Paula N.C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President/Planning Services/Hole Montes Inc. (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Telephone#; 239-254-2018 Fax: 239-254-2099 Email paulamcmichaeltc'�r,hmeng.com I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true.and correct,to the best of m�/ knowledge. er or Authorized Agent Signature III. Development Information Pro'ect Data Unit T es defined on a e 2 of a lication Current Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Fringe, MUCA #7 Proposed Land Use Designation: PUD Current Zoning: C4 Proposed Zoning: MPUD Project Acreage: 18.95± Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type. Total Units Proposed by Type: 303 Is this a phasedproject: No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application, Date/time stamp: iaAliOf AV Jeff Ape leii IL forbid lk file A, dialiF 41 AS ISM A4, Ake A. AMb AAA few ` �� .. / + giber Aiv eve Air p Af �. -Ile A .� 1 - r•-= -- OF A"A of fee A'A AO r / � -- ,, t�Y+ V ' J�o \\tr F�� • .._, _ f r �/ ` a Lf Ali �:i� L�fie �- « po ,.-y ---- -► I . ,� z r r few SOL i - ..11 �t VATJJ ei IMIA file kA \of vbrw ski -- .:!vv�r, YOU ion . % Alf,-16.1- --- . , rwAliAl w- • 0 1500 3000 scALE IN FEET RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK DR - Ad _I. SUBJECT SITE COLLIER COUNTY PHYSICIANS REGIONAL r r - • :< p SHERIFFS OFFICE � >w - DISTRICT 3 �• -COLLIER BLVD. t _ _� Jmommol .- GNP , N% k j • Tmwdld '.�7ttt F� '• •COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC ' SCHOOLS TRANSPORTATION .•- PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES NOTES 1. POLICE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. 2. FIRE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY GREATER NAPLES FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT. 3. THERE ARE NO WELL FIELDS WITHIN OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE COUNTY'S COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA. PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES LEGEND • -SCHOOL • -HOSPITAL • -SHERIFF /FIRE DEPARTMENT /EMS - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE Y�IJ I tm° IJ a I� IY W WLLJ z x 4FlP ED 3131 ek PMRCIENTRIN CFL RIN OOCORP LM006 OA BM 142E PO. 2D2 eID0 N 9T33'010 E 1235,85' (M) MFlP ILIEOBLE -- ------ - 0662 o7iD Nixon LU n� o7a 34'19' E 1237.31 C . ... •. �.:..Q ;. L. — I out OLM i I I I I I Parcel 2 RAPIDS. IID. 004167DWU AIEAmm L D 1 DUE. m 2814 i9. �1U 6V 1/4, SW 1/4 N IF R 57�1/4, SW $$ 07AD 77S Qgv.1. — _� MM I SASLE hi VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 0417 S 3;M 1/4, SW N/4 Z Wai out I I o73D I 1 I I I I I I II I I 0676 OR 671 PG l L , 10 50 RO io f6 OR. 1D1e, PG. tG22 RI I;161� °Pw"'4r•J[2lwH 1 r6Sl 16 ""° Parcel 1 PAlim Ra ow111eD0001 0LN M 8001� E�E2M2,�P0. 20111 � r WELL SITE SEE ABOVE FAST P0.0PERTY DESCIRIPTON: MFlP PLS SLOB PARCEL 1 (TAX PARCEL N0, 0O415800001) A A PORTION, PARCEL CR TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BONG IN WE COUNTY OF COWER IN WE STATE OF RORIpA IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP SO SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, BONG MORE PARTICULARLY �l DESGHIem AS Fouowm: 6QQa$j :A7 THE NORTH 1/2 OF WE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 of WE SOUTHWEST i� 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP SO SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY AS Ya GqI� LOCATED IN WE NEST 100 FEET OF SAID PARCEL, LYING AND BONG IN COWER COUNTY, PARCEL 2 (TAX PARCEL NO. DG416200007) 16k A PORTION, PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COWER IN THE STATE OF RORIDAIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP W SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BONG ME PARTICULARLY 3d OESCRISED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, OF SAID SECTOR 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, IN COWER CCUNW, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY AS LOCATED IN WE WEST 100 FEET OF SAID PARCEL, LYING AND SONG COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3 (TAX PARCEL NO. 0041]]20009) A PORTION, PARCEL OF TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEND IN WE COUNTY OF COWER, STATE OF FLORIDA, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BONG MORE PARTICULARLY A DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ME SOUTH 1/2 OF WE NCIRW 1/2 OF WE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF ME SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP SO SOUTH, RANGE 20 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY AS LOCATE) IN WE NEST 100 FEET OF SAID PARCEL, LYING AND BONG IN COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA. o6a 1 NOTES TO TIRE RENEW: WE LEGAL OESCRIPTW DESCRIBES THE SAME PROPERTY AS INSURED IN SUCH TTIE INSURARCE COMMITMENT MO ALL PROPERTY SPEtlFlC EXCEPTIONS HAVE BEEN NOTED. WE PROPERTY CONSTITUTES A PORTION OF/IS WE SAME AS THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN: PARCEL 1 RECORDED AT O.R. BOOK 2e42, PG. 279 TAX PARCEL NO, D0416600001 PARCEL 2RECOROED AT O.R. BOOK 2642, PO 252 TAX PARCEL NO. 0041820000E PARCEL 3RECOROED AT O.R. BOOK 263Z PO 1365 TAX PARCEL NO. 00417720009 11EM5 LISPED IN SCHEDULE B—II OF WE TITLE INSURANCE PREPARED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, HAVEND A FILE NO. 21012316TPi, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF •NLY 13, 2021 AT MOO AM HAVE OR RENEWED AS FOLLOWS: B. RICHiS BY VIRTUE OF LEASES) DEED BOOK 9, PG. Me DEED BOOK 10, PG, u, DEED BOOK 10, PC. 78, h O.R. BOOK 221, PG, 31. THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NATURE 7. FP61 RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT, O.R. BOOK 671, PG. 3, AS AMENDED BY O.R. BOOK 3129, PG, 2240. FALLS ON WIS PROPERTY, SPECIFICALLY ONLY ON PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 3, SHOWN HEREON. & SOLLO WASTE RESOWTON(5), O,R. BOOK 461& PG, D076 O.R, BOO( 47214 PG. 1527, AND O.R. BOOK 49654 PG. 1600. WIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NII 9. SOLID WASTE RESOWTOIII) O.R. BOOK 5676, PG. 11261 O.R. BOOK 5815, PG. 126E AND O.R. BOOK 591 PO. 2201 WIS PROPERTY FALLS WI ONE, BLANKET IN NATURE 10. IXNDINANCES, O.R BOOK 619, PG. 1177 — COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED, NOT PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE 11. NOTICE OF PROMMItt, O,R. BOOK 510& PC* 2640. THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NATURE 12. RESOWTION O.R. BOOK 6494 PG 1239. THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NATURE 13. FPBL EASTOIENT, O.R. BOCK 1018, PG 1022 IS LOCATED ON THIS PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON. 14. 30 UTLLTY EASEMENT, O.R. BOOK 109& PG. 181 AS AFFECTED BY aft, BOOK 2116, PG, 959 DOES NOT FALL ON WI5 PROPERTY. FALLS WITHIN CANAL R—O—We WEST OF THIS PROPERTY. 15. NOTICE OF PER41T, O.R. BOOK 0.0. BOOK DOW, PG. 1046 FALLS UPON PARCEL 3, BLANKET IN NATURE 16, EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF COWER COUNTY, RORIDA, O.R. BOO( 3927, PG. 3199 FALL ON THIS PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON, 1]. NOTICE OF PERMIT, O.R. BOOK 4123, PG. 1276 FALLS UPON PARCEL 2, BLANKET IN NATURE 1& ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT NOTICE O.R. BOOK 4332, PG, 457 FALLS UPON SAME AREA AS ITEM 16 ABOVE PERMIT CLEARLY STATES: 'IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A UEN, ENCUMBRANCE, OR CLOUD ON WE TITLE OF THE PREMISESa 21. RESOLUTION, O.R. BOOK 5081 PG. 3N2. THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NATURE 22 RESOWTON, O.R. BOOK 5077, PG, IM& THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NATURE Z3, RESOWTON, O.R. BOOK 51946 PG. 219& THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NATURE 24. RESOWTON, 01 BOOK 5314, PG. 770. THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN, BLANKET IN NATURE PROPERTY BOUNDARY OVERLAY ON FEMA MAP 1'W500' SEE COMA NOTES BELOW NOTES ELEVATIONS gEFFR TO THE NORTH AYFAICAN Y£RTIGL pATl4 OF 19B& WIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RE9WICTONS OF RECORD BEARINGS REFER TO WE WEST LINE OF WE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 144 TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 2B EAST, COWER COUNTY, RCRIDA AS BONG N.00]O'4YE WIS SURVEY MEE15 THE RELATIVE POSITIONAL PRECISION AS PER SECTION SJEI—v, WRISOICTONAL WETLANDS IF ANY HAVE NOT LOCATED. PUBLIC P1G11T—OF—WAY INFORMATION WAS BASED UPON COLUM COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER G1S WEB SITE STE ADDRESS: 855Z COWER BLVO, NAPLES R. 34114 AL WE TIME OF SURVEY, THIS PROPERTY WAS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE AE & M, AREAS DETERMINED TO HAVE A R000 ELEVATON OF tn.& AS SHOWN ON FEDERAL EHONGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (F.EM.A) ROOU INSURANCE RATE MAP (F.LR.M.) HAMNG MAR NO. 12021 C 0606 H, COMMUNITY NO. 120067, HANNC A F.I.R.M. INDEX DATED MAY 16, 2012. CONSULT COMMUNITY ROOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT OFFlCE FOR CURRENT RODE ZONE INFORMATION, PROPERTY APF.I TOTAL 19,00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS ZONING CLASSFlGTOM AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS — ZONING REPORT HAS NOT BEEN PRONGED. ABOVE OHOUNO IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON THIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN LOCATED HEREON AS SHOWN. ABOVE GROUND IN0IGTORS OF UNDERGROUND UTUTES EXISTING ON WIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN LOGIFD HEREON AS SHOWN. WERE ARE WELL FACILITIES LOCATED ON THIS PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON. WE PROPERTY IS OTHER VACART WITH NO BURDINGS AND NO PARKING. CLIENT HAS NOT SPUOnED MY DMSON OF PARTY WALLS NONE ARE APPARENT AT WE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. NAMES OF ADJOINING OWNERS ARE SHOWN HEREON. WE PARCEL IS LOCATED ON COWER BOULEVARD ( COUNTY RD 951 ), CLIENT HAS NOT SPECIFlED AN INTERSECTING STiEET. NO ENOENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION M BUILDING AOOITONS NO ENOENQ OF PROPOSED CHANCES TO RIGHT—OF—WAY UNES NO OFFSTE EASEMCHITS OR SERNTIOES HAVE BEEN DISCLOSED, THIS SLRVFI IS HOT VALID WITHOUT WE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF A FLORIDA UCENSED SIRVEYOi AND YAPPER. CERTFlED T0: LAPGO (SOUP, LLC COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AMERISITE LLC TITLE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS YAP OR PUT AND WE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED HERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE RWW THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LOUD SURVEYS. JONTL.Y ESTABUSNED AND ADOPTED BY ALTO AND NSPS ANO INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2 3. 4, 6A, fi8. 7A, 781, 7C. & 9. 10. 13. 14, i6, i] k 19 aF TARLF A WFAEOF. THE FlELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 0/11/2021. M wn.rr. UT HOLECWTTHORIZATION NUMBER le 1712BY_155626 THEMES N. MURPHY�r STATE OF FLORIDA PARRY ONE7: DAIS PH-11677 9 N0. � yAID YrtDidR JW B 1 202 � 95o Encore Vvay NaplesFL.34110 LATHGOMERISATE�1.089 LJISUREEI , , IIIFloddaCetficateof 951 PARCEL PLE:1I AND OHM SED-TW7F1110e: HOLE MONIES Authorization No. 1772 IFTIE0. LAND USE SUMMARY Description Acreage Percent Mixed Use (Tract MU 19*60 97.9% Preserve (Tract P) .0.40 2.1% Total: '194 100% IIII ! ! III! i oA� NATIVE VEGETA71ON'AND OPEN SPACE sting Native Vegetation 0.40, Acres Minimum On -Site Native Vegetation Preservation Requirements ,0.40 Acres Minimum Open Space Requirement Mined Use 19 x 30% 5.69 Acres 1 ZONING: A 1236.88' NOTES: 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT MAY BE FULFILLED OFF -SITE. Tn' vow 15' UTILITY WIDE TYPE "B" LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT j COUNTY WELL SITE (OR3927 ---� PG 3199) I � I HENDERSON ' CREEK CANAL I RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 1 I ' � 20' WIDE TYPE "D" ---LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1 1 POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 15' F.P.L. EASEMENT (OR 1018, PG 102 TRACT INTERCONNECTION MIXED USE ' PATHWAY INTERCONNECTION 1 I! i LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO BE DETERMINED L 10' WIDE TYPE "A" � LANDSCAPE BUFFER'j 170� F.P.L. EASEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY (OR 3129, PG 2240) j COLLIER COUNTY; TEMPORARY) 1 CONSTRUCTION; / EASEMENT! 40' X 50' UTILITY ! EASEMENT I (OR3927 PG 3199) j / COLLIER COUNTY WELL SITE .,_ AT_TIMEOF_SDP_ 1237.49' (M) I' \-POTEnrrlaL_______ Zoning: Good Turn Center -MPUD _ of„GNEo., o.,F R.V. 5 21 950 Encore We Naples, FL. 34110 Phone: (239) 254-2000 HOLE MONTES Florida Certificate of pX o4'Fffi•PU1mo Authorization No.1772 owswn ar o.iE 5 21 EREUEo erA o.re s � vEa' us a /. "o. ONTAL uEE - cn AMERISITE CB MPUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT C SCALE: 1" = 50' Q Z zO�w av� Ow— OLL+ oo�LL LL w LL w �ZQa F=0>v cc iOcQ THESE OR.IVI�N45 ME NOT WRIEMNMC OMWIINi NO. urnoveoronmxsr.urnoN maccr No. 2021.043 sNEErNo_ 1 of 1 oNn: ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT REVISED OCTOBER 28, 2021 COLLIER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 3211 68TH STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34105 239-263-2687 3*umu Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal. Requirement idual with academic credentials and experience in shall be prepared by an indivthe area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3211 68d' Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i) Identify on Current Aerial /the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS Amersite, LLC. consists of approximately 18.95 acres and is located in Section 14, Township 50, Range 26, Collier County. The proposed office park is located on the east side of County Road 951 (Collier Blvd.) and north of the intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The parcel is bordered by Collier Blvd (CR 951) to the west and an FPL easement to the east. Along County Road 951 there is a drainage canal that parallels the road. This parcel is located in the urban area and surrounding areas are currently under development. This parcel does have some history. This site was partially cleared and once operated as a nursery. An examination of the Collier County Property Appraisers records, show a progression of activity. The following permit numbers were associated with this parcel $4-2514, 84-9625 86-3757. These permits were for structures. During the expansion of Collier Blvd. (CR 951) the county utilized this parcel as a staging area. The nursery was gone, and the county utilized the parcel during the road expansion project. This included the temporary placement of fill and equipment. The site consists of approximately 18.96 acres. The site also has some easements. A 170' transmission line runs along the eastern property boundary and a 15' transmission line runs east west. In total the site has approximately 3.9 acres in easements. These include a 2.75 acre FPL easement, 1.05 acres for utilities and 10 acres for a shared driveway. A [JSACOE permit was issued for a county utility line (SAJ-2005-6149 (IP-TWM). Collier County Utilities has mitigated for 1.03 acres of impacts. This applicant obtained a South Florida Water Management District Permit 11-02748-P and a US Army Corp of Engineer permit SAJ-2005-6488 (IP-MBH). This permit allowed for the filling of 8.97 acres of low -quality hydric pine. Both permits called for the purchase of 4.84 of Forested Wetland Credits to off set the wetland impacts at Panther Island Mitigation Bank. These credits were purchased and have been deducted from the official agency mitigation ledger for Panther Island Mitigation Bank. During this process all environmental issues were satisfied. An exhibit depicting each FLUCCS Code with acreage has been provided B} Listed Species and Bald :Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. The neighboring property to the sou#h has a new bald eagle nest. This nest C0060 is located on the neighboring properties southern boundary. The 330 foot and the 660-foot buffer areas are identified. A section of the 660400t buffer overlaps onto this property. On the Master Plan the 660-foot buffer line was identified. Construction activities within this area needs to follow the US Fish and Wildlife Service's National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. Certain activities may require authorization through the Service. Clearing, external construction and landscaping within the 660 feet should be Clone outside breeding season. All infrastructure development, exterior building construction, and other referenced activities within 660 feet of the nest tree should, as a general rule, be completed during the non -nesting season. Infrastructure construction includes all land and lot clearing; fill work; construction of roads, drainage, sewer and storm water facilities; and installation of water, electricity and other utilities. However, it often is not possible to complete these above -referenced activities and other human related actions during the non -nesting season. The guidelines are applicable to those circumstances where those activities must be conducted during nesting season from 330-660 feet of the nest tree. Breeding Season is from October 1 —May 15tn Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) This parcel has along -documented history. This firm conducted a listed species study, on April 2005 and June 2006. Then in again in March 2016. The site historically offered very little as suitable habitat for vertebrates. No listed species or signs thereof were identified on the property during those studies. This project was previously reviewed by all regulatory agencies. During the ERP permit obtained from SFWMD and the US Army Corp of Engineers was environmentally reviewed. An updated examination of the subject parcel was conducted in June 2021. The site is extremely limited. The only native habitat is that of the 0.40 acre preserve. To the south is a new Bald eagle nest on the neighboring property. Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLLJCCS Code Map iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study, A Black bear management plan may be required at the time of SDP. C} Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Use: Not Applicable Vegetation or in Agricultural Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location. and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. Amersifie, LLC. consists of approximately 18.95 acres and is located in Section 14, Township 50, Range 26, Collier County. The proposed office park is located on the east side of County Road 951 (Collier Blvd.) and north of the intersection with Rattlesnake Ilammock Road. The parcel is bordered by Collier Blvd (CR 951) to the west and an FPL easement to the east. Along County Road 951 there is a drainage canal that parallels the road. This parcel is located in the urban area and the surrounding areas are currently developing. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards This site has previously obtained n�unerus developments orders. A 0.40-acre preserve was set aside. As such the site currently has a 0.40 acre preserve. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the Location of all preserves The preserve area has been identified. on the site plan. Soil Ground Water Sampling Natural Site An exhibit showing Collier county well field protection zones has been provided. �� SSlCS dR 0 OR le I r I H AVVTH OR ~' DRY If feel <.._. �� of — ?�mRe op F I L, eof r •pp I OR O Op n;�,• ,i J T .•=s..- .f j�r " �� `i t i .CAYMAN DR •r ..- II7Y RD A v,�,,,, womaln a �iF: ti zba..a�e `b Lo SABAL PALM RD �.% VA 9 SABAL^PALM RD Q E -;+ f?�SABAL PALM RD Ar 2NE TER aY z�*'C s6-� Ord ,ip `oY ..: IloH9{f 1 TOMMASIaCT DROR I q<!fC� i. , VtAgERTO CT yam'' 4 (( _ ik 044Ow yea 1 jdJOSEFA WAY, ', all 11•IF,.r.,l 1' .'LJR�GO� r y ire 66 �� 3 + IF ". - �� IF ` i41 ,•tee - A":.�- �A.,1rR,1' PI IF r " i • �— �? �' Oyu FFFrAp r y4IF JALn IF IF IF PFF , v.�pr+—n Ar >... kk =r r r . Fri4 r ^ \ I p T�Fx r r d' �r : • is III op, F ;:I,1 ^� ,.;. t ,4 ., , �e a '� ` •'al' a .P x iYx,, r..'IF �FiFori, It It _ `., t �` - , /, : ,Rv.1 IF IF rer IF •IFI- �L7IF FIN _ - ..Ikit' OFF IF -. - - IF It . �. me . r IF IF IF IF ac£''1IF yif • 3 IF IF FIF IF IF r • .�iC , r d IF It I I `I FL I F. I I ilke. ww t Isar g. `lc :' -Tjs �f. �+• ' -ice :b. fir.. '�; ..^' r: r S• ai-.� ... g- _ x 7 f 1F� i- yoylk`k'Z yC' i n,}; •• t1.. asI Fw.J._',M-�M4 �{d'r:+r.+•R -'�.-• Mail mr 44. ft lit �� ,•_. j ....•"^„�— _ S1 Yis t aplu it J• ) • .. ass is Ir 'da It as � r' T atis sow r „ 6 Pas as - - A, IONIC ` iiii_ y _ _ fir. •• � � ?!- Is Y ew It 41 is dA War i It Alf W94 - R= ..r a t �.� i or AAjmimw*is ills Irma If vlr �as f y-IGi1Fy�.i a .+�.. +�• iIF ?Ai sI2V 950 Encore Way Naplos. FL. 34110 Phono:(239)254-2000 HO MON TES Floridn Ceauleate of 1H01EFRS RANERS'91tYE1U15 Authorization No.1772 PROJECT SITE: 19.00t ACRES' 411 ACREAGE = 0.40 740 ACREAGE = 18.60 AREA TAKEN FROM COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER AMERISITE CB MPUD FLUCCS MAP EXH181T D ixl�e uxa.u�a.swane� uunu was uuww wu wmu��waca�saucra+ .SCI:IN�_ .e�n1 2021,043 1 of 1 Ili E liil i ili, I i .I 1 u look l ..� HENDERSON i (I, 1 CREEK CANAL r II RIGHT-OF-WAY W t --1---1--- — II„ p NQ US SI),ery1MAR� Descriptton Acreage Percent Mixed+Use ITract 18,00 97.9% MU) Preserve (Tract P) 0.40 2.19U Total: 19 100% I1iAT1VE VEGETATIpt�J A�10 OPEN SPACE Existing Native Vegetation 0.40 Acres mum On Site Native Vegetation 0 Presentation Requirements mum Open Space Requirement (Mixed Use) 19 x 30% 5.69 Acres ZONING: A 1236.88' NOTES: 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT MAY BE FULFILLED OFF -SITE. WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT^ -------------------- 10' WIDE TYPE "A" LANDSCAPE BUFFER i POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA zs` F.P.L. EASEMENT WIDE TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER I PATHWAY INTERCONNECTION I PATHWAY :—INTERCONNECTION BRACT "MU° MIXED USE 10' WIDE TYPE "A" LANDSCAPE BUFFER ( I i LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO BE DETERMINED I — — ATTiMEOFSDP ' 1237.49f (M) '�—POTENTIALINTERCONNECTION Zoning: Good Turn Center - MPUD JAM Naples,FLf34t10 AMERISITE C8 MPUO Pna,s: j23f3} zsa•2aoa MASTER PLAN A arizatior,No.1772 EXHIBIT C F.P.L. ECISEIVIEM RIGHT-Q�F-WI4Y Q Z z O N A v MVDMWt,l4[FIIrkOi `�sv+ectra e�uttnucn ok •aysszis.mac�ca, GU n[INai. 20ZI,043M5 DMA`b W: msrcrva.: 2021,043 srv�m,D.: 1 of 1 Dan i 4 4 low IF - IF I 7 IF I. FIFIFF PIP, w :_IF - d` IFF"mIF r IF PF- IF OFF k IF p IF IF PrPO IF OFF of 1,F FF,F. , - y - ., IF IFF .. -.. s -Y� Lr. ImP It PI, ti i' 'R.-.Y. J. d i "L i cE IF P. - 'y, - •s �rPlY r PIPPI.- Pp,It I. .a * - - . IF IF 9A Fl IF IF PL IS - -4M. ".. __ Leo.. h' 1 47 a i � L. pp IF TV o 4 ` �( a IT I IF 40 IT j I IF fiFa w r' IF PF -.. FILL 4, O AF IF ;cx Y+ FPO. .1 _..1 _ _ IF A.. IF _ .4 - PFFL -, _ IF taw IF I IF xF FLI IF 14 ,,, FLUCCS COD Co CODE Common Name 411 Slash pine TI (Description) Scientific Name Indictor Status Dominance/Stratum This area is a sma110.40 acre preserve. This area is dominated with Slash Pines and a palmetto understory. Exotics such as ear leaf acacia and downy rose myrtle are prominent. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Cp,O Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,O palmetto Serona repens FACU G,O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic KC Laurel oak Quercus virginicus FACU Cp,O Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- G,O Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic KC Downy rose myrtle Rhodomyrtus tomentosa Exotic M,C wiregrass Aristida stricta FAC- G,O Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,O Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC G.O Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC G,C Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,O 740 Disturbed This area has been legally cleared. The site is now vegetated with secondary and pioneer plant species. Sandspur Beggers ticks Chocolate weed Guineagrass Foxtail Broom sedge Whitehead broom flat sedge yellow nut sedge flat sedge Tasselflower Finger grass crabgrass bluehearts Dog fennel pineland heliotrope Cenchrus echinatus FAC G,C Bidens alba FACW G.O tLlelochia corchorifolia FAC GC Panicum maximum FAC- G,O Setaria geniculata FAC G,O Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,C Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,C Cyperus ligularis FACW G,O C yperus esculentus FAC G,O Cyperus difformis OBL G,O Emilia fosbergii UPL G,O Eustachys petraea FAC QO Digitaria charts FAC GO Buchnera Americana FAC G,C Eupatorium capillifolium FACW G,C Heliotropium polyphyllum FAC G,O ABREVIATIONS — Canopy (up), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) :urta G•i fl5D Encore Way Naples, FL. 3411D Phnne: (239)254.2000 Florida Cerdficele of Futhorizaftn No.1772 PROJECT SITE: 19.00t ACRES" 411 ACREAGE = 0.40 740 ACREAGE = 18.60 * AREA TAKEN FROM COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER �MERISITE CB MPUD FLUCCS h1AP �XHIBiT D vewe,.0 m.rncmx w.-+c+eoawr: narcrw: aenr�: o��: 2021.fJ43 ± of 1 SUILS x x H H H H x H COLLIER COUNTY SOIL - LEGEND REVISED 1/90 H. YAMATAKI 2 3 4 6 8 3 1 1 1 -t z Z 2 2 2 23 25 2? 28 29 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 45 48 49 50 51 52 53 �4 �IOI,OPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM MALABAR FS. CHOBEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND DANIA MUCKS DEPRESSIONAL RIVIERA; LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM-COPELAND FS ZMMOKALEE FS MYAKKA FS 4 OL DSMAK FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, 1 HALLANDALE FS 4 5 PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM POMELLO FS OLDSMAR FS BASINGER FS $-RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM F�' • DRUM AND 01 ALABAF;:.HIGH FS 1 BOCA FS 2 CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW AND OKEELANTA SOILS DEPRESSIONAL BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELA.ND FS DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW FS PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS WABASSO FS HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM JUPITER AND MAR.GATE • SOILS URBAN LAND URBAN LAND HOLOPAW BASINGER COMPLEX vRBAN 'LAND IMMOXALEE OLDSMAR LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM COMPLEX URBAN' L'AM AQUENTS COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM UDOR.THENT,S SHAPED TUSCAWILLA: FS L7RB71N LAND MATLAulfa LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM BOCA COMPLEX SATELLITE PS DURBIN AND WULFERT MUCKS URBAN LAND SATELLITE COMPLEX _ CANAVERA.L BEACHES ASSOCIAi'ION WINDER, RIVIER wl LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM- -AND CHOBEE SOILS DEPRESSIONAL ww PAOLA FS (1-8 percent slopes) PRMSUCCO SOIL (marl prairie) HALLANDALE AND BOLA- FS (slough.) 'OCHOPEE FSL, PRAIRIE (marl) OCHOPEE F5L KESSON MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED BS`rERO AND PECKISH SOILS FREQUENTLY_ FLOODED' JUPITER BOCA COMPLEX BASINGER FS, GCCASIOAQILLY=FLOODED. L kTor VI } 3 to to III 6� to V a '. to �}if -` 1 ti �lot -u7 It If : ' .. - <•• t^.r s-VV. it I of 14 — .•I�i t i�` - 1 t . to It OW, j wu� Y 1 } t } = F .' d — To i; _ - - - •_ _ t a' of gy i Ve S t �; 2f To �.dL 7 To �11 Ate I tool OL t �c ,s Tom' y rd— a4,011 pit OF V IT 9 IV IV r s'4`• fl G It + � _ til Ye �'�t.-KSa,, It fist r - - aJai 'r- 4 - - - r' - N _ .. - - - If IF F 1 1 �' Lwm Collier Coun Well Field Protection Zones 2010 Well Field Protection Zones L_- W -1 Zone = 1 Year Travel Time Isocontour LJ W - 2 Zone = 2 Year Travel Time Isocontour f I W - 3 Zone = 5 Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 4 Zone = 20 Year Travel Time Isocontour � 2 4 Lee County _ ��....' Orangetree Well Field \ ' Lee County T� r,_ -{ \� i Collier County Utilities _„w• •- i s f �, I (W- t E Golden Gate -1 q sosolow Immokalse 1 I Well Fie ld 1 I i —' -r- --- is do »row sl i ^��` _ Shlbbabdo t\ r i i i ._~�•7,,� � __—'(^ •r __ Well Field '-- _-- _~ All assaft ijsw soloo s OF ".' ' r ' CE a f loss Is Owosso'soos 000t Iss to LAD- 1 °Issso •� / ) lop I Is ok or NlimossIt so sol000r l fi i.i� ��j �soossr-AIs not; j` i sols -- '�.%i I i i, i = s i i, u iI ,`�i �i i tto \ i i i lAIl PROW Is 0 s ws City of ;-. "Ir- for ---~� Coastal ' ; ,j '(Naplesttj`-! j '_ 144,11,0141, 15, 1 Ridge lr�`�i t t _ _ \I f y` r I i 7 1 J� E Well Field +� f ti SHIA s - S. i ! •-• Mat 7 f 1 T 1 ... III Is ots 2 soo 2 solo "- / "04 do so:sol , e r ..._ jt t, Sri ` �' 1 11 �t y 001,41111 1r 1 i tirtii r��;e r'-�•' or V IMP show Miss slow Y' �� iIs}; Isis 1 rooks j� �Collier County Utilities tsoso Golden Gate ti l; s i�_ , i ..� . Well Field ol possess1E1so I l�moil smsss� Florida Governmental t i ' II" - i Utility Authority _ Golden Gate City r soosool`�. �4 I Well Field f �it s�Los low so _4l fA t Co er County crsiun aryr;.x i.re;.,, tl.a l.M.ro....h Do n.t le.tor d.d.l�. Ild. m.. our Ind.d..o=" and wn..rwud d4. m. Wf,*V,.�Ar,,,�;1. Ferro"oatw fs G6CAD %, -TOga stood �MNnK.'�ad Deso 4r gNRopluan FR Wfp210-1111/+.d p.+ 11111 � ��. If pawsw p Ave Maria Well Fleld City of Maples East Golden Gate Well Field fA t Co er County crsiun aryr;.x i.re;.,, tl.a l.M.ro....h Do n.t le.tor d.d.l�. Ild. m.. our Ind.d..o=" and wn..rwud d4. m. Wf,*V,.�Ar,,,�;1. Ferro"oatw fs G6CAD %, -TOga stood �MNnK.'�ad Deso 4r gNRopluan FR Wfp210-1111/+.d p.+ 11111 � ��. If pawsw p Ave Maria Well Fleld City of Maples East Golden Gate Well Field -IN -" I - 40 ^_ AMMANds Voodoo" �Mft '• t..... 4 MFOAS _ M_i sows / WINVAMMAD 1 \�I i i Everglades City 1 Well Field of the islands Field t LISTED SPECIES REPORT AMERISITE REVISED OCTOBER 28, 2021 COLLIER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 3211 68TH STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34105 239-263-2687 INTRODUCTIVN: This report is an account of a Listed wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on an 18.95 acre tract called Amersite. Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report are based on fieldwork performed during June 2021. DESCRIPTION: Amersite, LLC. consists of approximately 18.95 acres and is located in Section 141) Township 50, Range 26, Collier County. The proposed office park is located on the east side of County Road 951 (Collier Blvd.) and north of the intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The parcel is bordered by Collier Blvd (CR 951) to the west and an FPL easement to the east. Along County Road 951 there is a drainage canal that parallels the road. This parcel is located in the urban area and surrounding areas are currently under development. See Exhibit # 1 -Location Map This parcel does have some history. This site was partially cleared and. once operated as a nursery. An examination of the Collier County Property Appraisers records, show a progression of activity. The following permit numbers were associated with this parcel 84-2514, 84-962, 86-3757. These permits were for structures. During the expansion of. Collier Blvd. (CR 951) the county utilized this parcel as a staging area. The nursery was gone, and the county utilized the parcel during the road expansion project. This included the temporary placement of fill and equipment. The site consists of approximately 18.96 acres. The site also has some easements. A 170' transmission line runs along the eastern property boundary and a 15 transmission line runs east west. In total the site has approximately 3.9 acres in easements. These include a 2.75 acre FPL easement, 1.05 acres for utilities and .10 acres for a shared driveway. A USACOE permit was issued for a county utility line (SAJ-2005-6149 (IP-TWM). Collier County Utilities has mitigated for 1.03 acres of impacts. This applicant obtained a South Florida Water Management District Permit 11-02748-P and a US Army Corp of Engineer permit SAJ-2005-6488 (IP-MBH). This permit allowed for the filling of 8.97 acres of low -quality hydric pine. Both permits called for the purchase of 4.84 of Forested Wetland Credits to off set the wetland impacts at Panther Island Mitigation Bank. These credits were purchased and have been deducted from the official agency mitigation ledger for Panther Island Mitigation Bank. During this process a11 environmental issues were satisfied. The following is now the acreage figures breakdown. 740- Disturbed Cleared 411- Slash pine 18.60 acres 0.40 acre Preserve The entire site provides very poor quality habitat for vertebrates. The entire site is void of native vegetation / habitat. The open field consists of secondary, pioneer plant species. The area consist of broom sedge, The preserve area consists primarily of Slash pine, ear leaf acacia and palmetto. There are some exotics present such as ear leaf acacia, Melaleuca, Downy rose myrtle and Brazilian pepper. The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in June 2021. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. These transects were ground - located and walked by compass bearing. Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 -1800) time periods were chosen to survey these transects. This survey was conducted daily for a minimum of five days. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. June 9 -11, 2021 Clear,High 80's The open cleared areas were traversed. Primary attention was in the small preserve on site and perimeter properties. �r Listed Flora None seen. Refer to Exhibit # 2 Listed Fauna - Cumulative Plant List A description of the wildlife found onsite is pxovidcd below. Refer to Exhibit # 3 -Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion Taking into account the location and condition of the property and State and Federal listed species that could be found on or around the site include. Gopher Tortoise No Active Burrows were found. Big Cypress Fox Squirrels The area is known as potential fox squirrel habitat. Observations were keyed to searching ima for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed foraging and/or inhabit Ling the subject parcel. Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though $lack bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. A nuisance Bear exhibit has been attached. The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida. Previously known as the Florida {Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. Examination of all trees with potential cavities was conducted. Trees were examined for any cavities and/or snags. The current density of the midstory plants would impede flight patterns. No individuals and/or guano were found. This project is not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Red Cockaded Woodpeckers Red -Cockaded woodpeckers (RCW) are known to inhabit some upland portions in Collier County. This site does not have any vast Pine Flatwoods conducive as prime Red - Cockaded woodpecker habitat. However, this site does have some Slash pines. All mature Slash pines were checked. Particular attention was paid to the south and west faces of the trees, as that seems to be the predominant location of cavity openings. No individuals or cavity trees were identified during this survey. i 1 Asj:31a There is a nest immediately to the south. This nest is on the neighboring parcel called Good Turn Center. Collier County nest # C0060. A segment of this parcel falls in the bald eagle nest secondary 660400t buffer zone. An exhibit has been attached showing the nest location and Primary and Secondary zones. Florida Panther Several individuals have been identified several miles to the east of the project site. No individuals have been documented utilizing this project site or identified during this survey. This species also has a large home range and is known to inhabit Golden Gate Estates and surrounding areas. This project is located within the mandatory Panther consultation zone for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Primary Zone). During the permitting process, 4.84 credits were purchased from Panther Island Mitigation Bank with the appropriate PHU's to offset the impacts. CONCLUSION: This parcel has along -documented history. This firm conducted a listed species study, on Apri12005 and June 2006. Then again on March 2016. The site historically was very limited as suitable habitat to vertebrates. The exotics predominately melaleuca, ear leaf acacia and Brazilian pepper dominated the site. No listed species or signs thereof were identified on the property during those studies. This project was previously reviewed by all regulatory agencies. During the ERP permit obtained from SFWMD and the US Army Corp of Engineers was environmentally reviewed. Since then, the project was permitted and cleared for development. The parcel is entirely cleared, except for a small upland preserve. During this survey we walked transects over the entire parcel. We spent most of our time examing the small preserve. Transacts were walked on straight compass bearings along a grid spaced at approximately 30 yards apart for the entire parcel. Other transacts were primarily meandering transacts through areas of prime habitat. All transects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours. This was conducted in June 2021. This parcel is roughly rectangular in configuration and is bordered by a busy county road and drainage canal on its western boundary. The parcel is bordered by an FPL easement and substation to the east. Less than a %4 mile to the south and east is the large new subdivision named Hacienda and the Swamp Buggy Fairgrounds. This parcel is extremely limited as viable habitat. The parcel is surrounded by development and the site is all cleared but for 0.40 acre preserve. This survey found some small mammal utilization of the preserve. A few birds were seen traversing the site. To the south of this parcel is a bald eagle nest. A segment of this project falls within the 660400t Bald eagle nest zone. S ecies Black bear Florida panther Everglades mink Bonneted Bat Big Cypress Fox squirrel Indigo snake American alligator Gopher tortoise Gopher Frog Present Southeastern American kestrel Red -Cockaded woodpecker Florida Scrub Jay Wood stork Snail kite Bald eagle Limpkin Osprey White ibis Tricolored heron Snowy egret Reddish egret Little blue heron x Absent IN NEWMAN1DRII1Q1lIIP > r x f a., - 1 4..� t 'y f• ONJ INA Fly pp ILI ALI 0 r .�:. Pi IF CLUB'ESTATE 1 - IF i u FAIL I AN II F ac IN ��'` x±r N i jm z to a e� r n' U - IF ILI 1 _ c C07 W ` "�14R4 N n l i C �wrr to A. y Gtty�it n01 Ali. CAYMAN DRNINA r �.� ,. r � �y>�...*r Z JOHNS RDlio�•'� l _ i -: ci AMITY RD �,. a Q� C�ASsic'17sDR tPv 7 J t { . + i.' x �a - z- % ALLSA PALM Rd ' a It N S-' SABAL PALM RD _ co 1. t? �SABAL PALM RD IF FIANITHORNE TER NOV,gR ,-1 1 FAIN qfc� 4 , ! al A I Fit '1 f ��s g"' t F f?..IF 0 A AN 1 46,,� N�iII``� ToMMgsi CT IN f IY ' GRANDLEL•Y.DR ~< <'�f�(: NiDERT IN INC7 O R +, PFAA I, IN,ip' JOSE�A WAY --•;: { It A�` ro 4 IN ra fn AN IN uj FILL AEG ALL I TG ALI All Its<w,:ANN . � ate '..,: a• :' :EA w ..-•- - r Felt: 4 rb t � v III • F ,'•,4r fb rt r OFF IF 4 1 t gray '� t F -r _ • -IF a.. I IF .- Fowl 4 -IF _ _ •.;e ..'i. '' - - •{_... c� 4. IF IF IF t, h: FIF I � r :gWst=aka �. FIF 1'r. or 4 F. aw pp yam' i +•,yam y�. �Iv�I IV IF . r-w IF -�y y,. �! IIF p �ti.}Y' k'• yea •wA, . Rr 3 - I,.r ` F•Y_ ,:1V" *°r �43- ,117a €ti•�j '14,yf'ti" '��. -K0' ,3 %'• t IN IIFa % ral -_� a.: M t } - / 3 F`sM_Z }.7i.� .�.. i. k- M w too F.F vtl IV °}Pyt , �� •t ' 1 b ..' c o�.,#, Yam` IIF rY y. 14 `4 ,jys• , 1 t• rs �bt "r i a '-`' p, 1,- •H', y-I'`- �. ALI FF himir%t For •. IF IF For I ft FrFi i I,qFFF- —� �- _ _.IF IF X 7 �,.oFrIb?. r} wa FtA xt -R) mY s�o Encore way Naples, FL. ?A110 Phono:�239)264.2C00 Florida CeNSea:o of Al:lhorizeVon No.1772 PROJECT SITE: 19.00t ACRES* 411 ACREAGE = 0.40 740 ACREAGE = 18.60 Y AREA TAKEN FROM COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER AMERISITE CB U1PUD FLUCCS MAP EXH161T 0 MAOa1'MVts�rluJl +;�; 1,1(:µyl; UWIIS1IRWYIV:Y. ��. � _. aanw. 2021.043 o++. 1 of 1 FLUCCS CODE Common Name 41I Slash pine (Description) Scientific Name Indictor Status Dominance/Stratum This area is a small 0.40 acre preserve. This area is dominated with Slash Pines and a palmetto understory. Exotics such as ear leaf acacia and downy rose myrtle are prominent. Slash pine Cabbage palm palmetto Brazilian pepper Laurel oak Guineagrass Ear leaf acacia Downy rose myrtle wiregrass Grape vine Virginia creeper Cat -briar Caesar weed. 740 Disturbed Pinus elliotti FACW Cp,O Subal palmetto FAC M O rep ens re FACU G,O S'chinus terebinthifolius Exotic KCQuercus virginicus FACU Cp,O Panicum maximum FAG- G,O Acacia auriculiformis Exotic M,C Rhodomyrtus tomentosa Exotic M,C Aristida stricta FAC- G,O ViUS rotundifolia FAC G,O A npelopsis quinquefolia FAC G.O Smilax spp. FAC G C Urena lobate FACU G,O This area has been legally cleared. The site is now vegetated with secondary and pioneer plant species. Sandspur Cenchrus echinatus FAC G,C Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW G.O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC G,C Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- G,O Foxtail Setaria geniculata FAC G,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,C Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,C flat sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW G,O yellow nut sedge Cyperus esculentus FAC G,O flat sedge Cyperus difformis OBL G,O Tasselflower Emilia fosbergii UPL G,O Finger grass Eustachys petraea FAC G,O crabgrass Digitaria cilaris FAC G,O bluehearts Buchnera Americana FAC G,C Dog fennel Eupatorium capiuVolium FACW G,C pineland heliotrope Hehotropium polyphyllum FAC G,O ABREVIATIONS — Canopy (up), Midstory (NI), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) �� Common Name Amphibian &Reptiles: Brown anole Birds: Dove- mourning Mockingbird Red belly woodpecker Crow, American Bluejay Gray catbird Cardinal Mammals: Virginia opossum Raccoon Nine -banded armadillo S ecies Aeolis sa rei Zenaida macroura Mimus poly lg. ottos. Melanerpes carolinus Carvus brachyrh nchos Cyanocitta cristata Dumetella carolinensis Ri.chmondena cardinalis Didelphis virginiana Procyon lotor Dasypus novemcinctus Status AAA 4- --F - r f: too el tt R .� kit t + . -S LT rarK S beSMART Jun 2.03', 2021 0 Cape �. Estero B� .� P resth S g Cypress eservatioi IIII 1i,11.1,4< PANTHER CONSULTATION AREA f Ft e 1 571n� it l n l i` trey Ot�k GoIde.ii lea Country — s3okfe � Club Gates fu_fr}r at ,IoyOaks Napier, t:ount1 GI-ande G it+k Golf Club A:funi�i�e1# Airwt ` ;i Ertl i�lSf td�lpla� f? r { rraple! . A�'ttlC•n. �yaif Iui Riviera r;oal i�ipl� -' Club c';olf R ��untr ?. {�o7tlrF Club Royal Palm ` (Bo IfClub , ' Le ly C fi stc Naples t:i1ri t-r., r 4 "Viso Ray l�,iclrrt 6/22l2021, 4:32:30 PM - Panther Habitat Zones Panther Habitat Preservation Plan ��ob�rt at b�fatr oEa Golf Clutaat f' kltitl�r'S r reEk 1fi LaL.• ��olf � Iltl 44,448 1:1 5 1 2 4 mi 0 1.75 3.5 7 km University of South Florida, County of Collier, Esri. HERE, Garmin, USGS, NGA, EPA, USDA, NPS, Fforida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission -Fish and Wildlife Research Institute TRGIS User Disclaimer: This nraphical representation is provided for informational purposes and should not be considered authoritative for navigational, engineering. legal. and other uses. m BLACK BEAR NUISANCE CALLS Iwr- ;i��s 4:1t1i1, ti - P� �F -. K `wanly a; tub ' :di t? t 3<7 S 44 pr Fr YL �- riair- 3/22/2021, 4:26:01 PM 1:187056 0 0,13 0.25 0.5 mi "" Black Bear Calls 0 U OA 008 km Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission -Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, University of South Florida, County of Collier, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INGREMENT P, USGS, METIINASA, EPA, USDA TRGIS User Disclaimer: This graphical representation is provided for informational purposes and should not be considered authoritative for navigational, engineering, legal, and other uses. :' I !I ilik ! -— 7 41 reI IF st IF ?` �k .y, 6ICN r • r 3r' !r '1 V F' FL w .=If FIFF IF IV IF IF x Naples Lakes Ic 4 Club . _. "AIR F'Orida Sports toFIF G { d1K If t r CL '0 , "'VO 0 A ^_: : -IL —w I. , Rattle!;nake Hammock Rd 94ptile nakte-l�,*Rd �It TVIF �. _ '.... - yyyy. n LL FIFO P 11 COLLEGE cif O O �} �� w IFF o, Ii. Or s' "IIF Alt- IN �u 49. I IF It -r F.Ln,N, r, ,IF I:.IEd7YEt11c1r I IF 1 r Edlso 1 Srh6Q�I .rt 4 v r�h'tf�e_r.nix}P j s. C6fi ` "r •CulturahOwicv�^y c emw*vQ .ltte�i4. £ff@(.P E rt .q, . Ar Lz+ce�►� ;[tram The, c, Coil$ / Johns Rd' : 3 ut'lt Pyr s �r _ Club 1�4 d+t Llty �►.. I. Amato, Rd JIFIL LI 1.0 IF ' IF MP r IF r't Alf APOIXtAa. a AillkV a. f Oil ftj *Q;IN L 41 IF pi ILIIN IV } IN :.IV 6LIN Imp, 4 LN IN lot LANIDS INN I aLint. Illy LINLIN CRia y _ V . `taaIda Soar s - Park r "all 0 LIN ON iei �i,'�. �" IND _ 063 S.7Wy r 4q i T �" ! R n Ft i.ti3{'*i1'•ak_�' Y'1diT�h't";F•,.k PAtr Rattlesnake HaAllnCir.A R� f��i+Mwar�•nejL,tv ..�.� �w�._ R, �• � f ~ ^LIN I LLIN IN 4 ' 1 � r• .1• t. t• �; 4, t, _• 4 moot Vt 1. s' f yfi- � �4 e. h. y � j'2 r ,�a t" p moll, c ..lk Jo of T meek Ir 14 &A v 6w Odorl 0 am!' ` .,o� a t - .l �+ I •2,. tl to lo Ir ter . �• ► _ or mot. L t' l r mef hil mop 2. f;. Tx 7 •IF4�1 _ PL \ t% 41 OK r 4 1 if .,� a �► , 4 to 14 oo el :' } me IL ot me _ .tip- - } L of ". >vw.p 4 or r me `f ;_ $tip* k96 ' . met 4Isemo . �f.IIP jf � � _ - 1 -. Rai Adi�''a - M• _ NMI CLEARED SITE P8911COCK planning •engineering I at Amerisite CB Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ) Prepared for: Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier County, Florida 10/27/2021 Prepared bv: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-56&9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodolo�y Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* —Small Scale Study — No Fee Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — 16 — October 2021 Statement of Certification certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, P.E., State of Florida license 47116, using a SHA-1 authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA4 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA TREe No 47116 '.';r, =��. 'i= �'.... STATE OF 0 :4o/ IO N A� � 0% Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida,l=Naples, o=Norman Trebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.bi z Date: 2021a29 08027052 Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No, 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Page �2 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ - I IS — October 2021 Table of Contents ProjectDescription....................................................................................................................................... 4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................................. 6 SiteAccess Analysis....................................................................................................................................... 9 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................................. 9 Mitigation of Impact........ see see see 10 Appendices Appendix A Project Conceptual Site Plan..................................................................................................11 Appendix B Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)..................................................................13 Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Calculations............................................................................................19 Appendix D Collier County Transportation Element Map — TR 3.0.........................................................*$$ 39 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October l ProI ect Description The Amerisite CB project is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR 864), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. The subject property is approximately 18.95 acres in size. Refer to Figure 1—Project Location Map and Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan. WRGI-FMQ Q .v.. 91ill Ow Home Family Rol Wood � Country 1_ y�nuy Gub� Arden Courts of Lely Patms oafPr a Figure 1—Project Location Map QwmySouthAvpyn 5hsduwwoodQ gaftlesnake Hsmngck a Inspire Apartments O j WJ .ULmuLalesApartmcntsQ We OsapphaaCoveCv NGlIatNayer• l.µ:es VProject LocationGrande Aparlments ODIsrovery ESnenda raH Fluaida Village Al Naples laVeST3-1 rM�rsonSouthPnyLKlgfr, Rsglonal ��SlatCaFlier Rlvd© ,...••..:�`Collier Asfer al lNY Re>nrf The Athrnpan NaplesQ 0Napies RV ResortPadnrtq Lol 6 ripen Par" lthl Ashton Place9v •GolelyRecentGol1p�Wnlry Of& oGreen 6 GmundsaLawn MainlmarilVLardKape Supply cgadMoaa.Tavern An- 4-28. In addition, in agreement with the CC Resolution No. 14,l a conditional use was approved for Air Conditioned Indoor Self -Storage (SIC Code 4225) within a General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District. hedevelopmentteamrequeststorezonethepropertyfromGeneralCommercial(C-4)toMixed torage) as currently approved and one C-5 use (truck rental), and/or up to 16 residential dwelling nits/acre for a maximum of 303 dwelling units. naddition,theamendmentproposestoretainthetrafficgenerationpotentialascurrentlyallowedby Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 4 Amerisite CB — (3MPA/PUDZ — Tls — October 2021 The purpose of this Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) is to document the transportation impacts associated with the proposed request. This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures. The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 10th Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. Consistent with the approved Amerimed Center Subdivision Construction Plans dated March 2006, the site can be developed with a building area of 4.8 acres (ac) or 209,088 square feet (sf). For the purposes of this report the allowable commercial intensity is considered 10,000 sf / ac based on general accepted planning practice and reasonable site development potential under C4 zoning designation. In agreement with ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations associated with the development program are illustrated in Table 1. It is noted that ITE Trip Generation Manual does not include data for Truck Rental facilities. Table 1 Development Program —ITE Land Use Designation Land Use - [SIC Code in Brackets] ITE Land Use Code Size Allowed Development Intensity Commercial — [All C4 permitted uses typical for a shopping center as an 820 — Shopping Center 189,500 square feet inline/outparcel use] Proposed Development Intensity ell Commercial — [All MPUD permitted uses typical for a shopping center as an 820 — Shopping Center 70,000 square feet inline/outparcel use] Multiple -Family Dwellings - [N/A] 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 303 dwelling units Self -Storage - [4224] 151— Mini -Warehouse 85,000 square feet Truck Rental - [7513] (N/A) 40 trucks Note(s): (l) N/A= Not applicable. In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting non-residential uses to residential dwelling units (not to exceed 303 dwelling units), subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. A transportation methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation staff on June 2, 2021, via email. For details, refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — I IS — October 2021 Access to the Amerisite CB site is currently provided via a directional movement access onto Collier Boulevard (ref. Appendix A). The proposed amendment does not request any additional connections to Collier Boulevard. Trip Generation The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software), most current version is used to evaluate the projected trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and/or rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. Residential Multifamily component —The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides three unique land use codes that describe Multifamily Housing. Based on the number of levels (floors) provided, these are illustrated as follow: LUC 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise), LUC 221 — Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) and LUC 222 — Multifamily Housing (High -Rise). As more specific data is not available at this stage, the LUC 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) represents a conservative estimate and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. The associated residential common recreation amenities are considered passive incidental to the residential land use and are not considered in the trip generation analysis. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. As illustrated in the adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, the overall internal capture rate should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. For the purposes of this report, internal trip capture is considered between the proposed shopping center use and the multifamily housing use and it is estimated using the balanced internal trips procedure as illustrated in ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3" Edition. As internal capture data for the weekday daily time period is not available, the daily internal capture is conservatively assumed identical with the AM peak hour internal capture rate as illustrated in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. The resulting internal capture rates for the weekday traffic, AM peak hour and PM peak hour are 1%, 1% and 10%, respectively. The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass -by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass -by trips are not deducted for operational turn lane analysis (all external traffic is accounted for). Retail pass -by traffic is accounted for the proposed shopping center land use code only (ITE LUC 820). Based on the information illustrated in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition pass -by capture for LUC 820 —Shopping Center is 34% for PM peak hour traffic. Trebil��cl< Ca�nsulti�� 5t�lu�i�ns, P� �' � g L � c� Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass -by capture for Shopping Centers (LUC 820) should not exceed 25% for the peak hour traffic and the daily capture rate should be assumed to be 10% lower than the peak hour capture rate. Consistent with a conservative approach, this analysis calculates pass -by trip percentages for LUC 820 — Shopping Center, as follows: AM/PM peak hour rates at 25% and the daily capture rates at 15%. Per FDOT's (Florida Department of Transportation) Site Impact Handbook (Section 2.4.4) the number of pass -by trips should not exceed 10% of the adjacent street traffic. The FDOT presents this factor as a measure of reasonableness and illustrates that it is a rule -of -thumb and not a statistically studied factor. The Collier Blvd segment from Davis Blvd to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd is the roadway link directly accessed by the project traffic. The 2020 peak hour, peak direction traffic volume for this roadway segment is 2,130 vehicles per hour (vph) as illustrated in the currently adopted 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). The project is estimated to generate 48 peak hour, peak direction pass -by trips which represent approximately 2% of the adjacent street traffic. Truck Rental Facilities —The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10t" Edition does not provide traffic data for this specific use. Conservative traffic assumptions are implemented in this report based on information gathered from similar type facilities as illustrated in Appendix C. The estimated trip generation associated with current zoning approval is illustrated in Table 2A. Table 2A ITE Trip Generation — Current Zoning Designation — Average Weekday Development Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (2-way) ITE Land Use SizeEnter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Shopping Center 189,500 sf 91285 153 94 247 419 453 872 External Traffic Pass -by Traffic 1,393 38 24 62 105 113 218 Net External Traffic 70892 115 70 185 314 340 654 Notes): (1) sf =square feet. In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. Based on the traffic data depicted in Table 2A, the estimated net increase in external trips allowed under current zoning designation is 654 PM peak hour two-way trips. The trip generation calculated for the proposed GMPA/PUDZ development conditions is summarized in Table 2B. Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUD2 — TIS — October 2021 ITE Trip Generation —Proposed Development —Average Weekday _ Daily Development AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (2-way) ITE Land Use Size(L) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total 32 105 137 100 58 158 303 du 21250 Multifamily Housing (Low Rise) Shopping Center 70,000 sf 4,717 116 71 187 200 217 417 Mini=Warehouse 85,000 sf 128 5 4 9 7 7 14 Truck Rental(') 40 trucks 330 33 33 66 33 33 66 Traffic 7,425 186 213 399 340 315 655 Internal Capture 68 2 2 4 33 33 66 External Traffic 71357 184 211 395 307 282 589 Pass -by Traffic 702 29 17 46 48 48 96 Net External Traffic 61655 155 194 349 259 234 493 du =dwelling units; sf =square feet. V, non-ITE land use; estimate based on specific use operations, refer to Appendix C. Collier County's Concurrency Management System is intended to ensure that there is adequate roadway capacity available to serve current and future development. Transportation Concurrency is a measure of the capacity of the roadway system to support the adopted level of service for vehicular traffic. As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For County facilities, the level of service standard is measured on a peak hour basis. As previously mentioned, the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour as illustrated in the currently adopted Collier County 2020 AUIR. Table 3 illustrates the projected PM peak hour, peak direction, net new traffic generated by the proposed amendment. The potential additional traffic is determined as the difference between Table 2A and Table 2B (the allowed traffic under currently approved zoning designation versus traffic generated by the proposed amendment). Table 3 Trip Generation —Projected Net New Traffic —Average Weekday Development PM Peak Hour Enter I Exit I Total Current Zoning Designation�1i � 314 1 340 ( 654 Proposed Development GMPA/PUDZ�2� 1 259 ( 234 1 493 Net New Traffic (55) (106) (161) (Decrease) Note(s): �l� Refer to Table 2A. �2> Refer to Table 2B. ��bilcock Consuliin� Sc?I��iior�s, P.� P a � e j � Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — 16 — October 2021 As illustrated in Table 3, projected traffic impacts associated with the proposed GMPA/PUDZ development scenario do not exceed the traffic impacts allowed under current zoning conditions. Site Access Analysis Access to the Amerisite CB site is currently provided via a directional movement access onto Collier Boulevard (ref. Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan). The proposed amendment does not request any additional connections to Collier Boulevard. Collier County's roadway network is comprised of State, County, City and privately maintained roadways. Roadways are generally classified as Arterial, Collector, or Local. Access management is the design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257, as amended. Based on the Access Management Policy, Section 3.02, "...the existing permitted connections, existing median openings are not required to meet the standards of the assigned classification. Such features shall generally be allowed to remain in place unless for safety, operation or protection of the roadway capacity deemed necessary to modify or close by Collier County. These features shall be brought into reasonable conformance when new connection permits are granted, following significant changes in property use, or as changes to the roadway design occur." The Collier Boulevard (CR 951) segment from Rattlesnake Hammock Road to Davis Boulevard is currently a north -south 6-lane divided roadway under C011ier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 50 mph in the vicinity of the project. As illustrated in the Collier County Capital Improvement Element —Transportation Element Map TR-3.0 (Federal Functional Classification/Urban Boundaries —Collier County), the subject Collier Boulevard segment is designated a major arterial (ref. Appendix D: Collier County Transportation Element Map — TR-3.0). A detailed evaluation of the access point —turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Improvement Analysis Based on the results illustrated in this report, from a transportation level of service stand point, the proposed development scenario is less intensive when compared to what is allowed under current zoning conditions. The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 654 two-way PM peak hour net new trips, based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. rebilcc�cE< Ce�rss�a'sEing ��€�kio�s, �'t� � � e e � 9 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ - I IS — October 2021 In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting non-residential uses to residential dwelling units (not to exceed 303 dwelling units), subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points —turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. gation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Amerisite c8 — GMPA/PUDZ — Tls — October 2021 Project Conceptual Site Plan �-7- rD Cr n 0 0 77 n 0 rF Pq 0 o' I r. r.. lei I r I III I 1 Ili i I I I I II I 1 I! I , I I u ' 1100 o HENDERSON 1 ' CREEK CANAL 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY i l I I r�1 1 I I , , , I ' I , I ' I I I I LAND USE SUMMARY Descripilon Acreage Percent MUD Use (Tract 1 18.60 92.9% t Preserve (Tract P) t 6.40 2.1% Total:. 14. 100% 10' WIDE TYPE "A" LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDE TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER PATHWAY INTERCONNECTION i 1 PATHWAY �. INTERCONNECTION . I 1 I 1 1 ZONING: A TRACT IIPI PRESERVE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 15' F.P.L. EASEMENT TRACT oMun MIXED USE NOTES: 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT MAY BE FULFILLED OFF -SITE. 10' WIDE TYPE "A" LANDSCAPE BUFFER i y LANDSCAPE BUFFERTO BE DE7ERMWED - ATTIME OF SDP i _1237.490 (M) ----- -- -- --- %\-POTENTIAL INTERCONNECTION Zoning: Good Turn Center- MPUD j t it , �I i I .I I I it '. 15' UTILITY EASEMENT , I 17ft' F.P.L. EASEMENT 1 RIGHT-OF-WI4Y � 1 I: 11 1 i V p li it I ' 1 II '1 1 I; �I �Y— r !� Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) �Frc��iiic�?c�c Cc�r7s��l�ir�g 5€�Euti�r�s, P,�e F' � g e � 1�S Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Ca•oss out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date: June 2, 2021 Time: N/A Location: N/A —Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth IVianagement Division 2) Norman Trebilcoek, TCS 3) Ciptian Malaescu, TCS Study Preparers Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Ile Co AICP PTOF_. PE Organization: "Trebilcoek Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200, Naples, FL 34104; ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s)• Reviewer's Name &Title: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager Organization: Collier County Transportation Planning Department Telephone Ntuttber: 239-252-2926 Applicant• Applicant's Name: hole Mantes, IriC, Address: 950 Encore Way, Naples, F134110 Telephone Number: 239-254-2000 Proposed Development: Name: Amerisite — GMPA and MPUD Rezone Location: East side of Collier Blvd (CR 951), north of Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (CR 8 54), Naples, FL — refer to Fig. 1) Land Use Type: Commercial and Residential ITE Code M Varies — per ITE Trip Generation Manual ('TGM), 10�' Edition Description: The subject project is currently vacant and consists of 18.95 acres. The request is to rezone the property from C-4 to MPUD to allow C4 commercial uses, along with one conditional use (self -storage) as currently approved and one C-5 use (truck rental), and/or up to 16 residential dwelling units/acre for a maximum of 304 wellingunits. the proiect is currently serviced by a directional median access onto Collier Blvd. No additional connections onto Collier Blvd. are requested as part of this application. Page 1 of 5 Trebilcoek Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 14 Amensite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — Tls — October 2021 Figure 1— Project Location Map w - p;; wi , � locat«cn ,...... 0 _ .. J .; • ` le C**W oa g a wa Zoning Existing: Ord. #14-27a Ord. #14-28a Ord 14-152 Comprehensive plan recommendation: GMPA Requested: approval for development Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study type: The proposed change will not exceed the__allowable trip cap. Since projected net new AM or PM project traffic is less than 50 two-way peak hour trips, this study qualifies for a Small Scale TIS. The allowable development intensity is considered 10,000 sf commercial/acre based on general accepted practice and reasonable site development potential under C4 zoning desienation. The traffic report will determine a trip cap associated with 18.95 ac x 10,000 sf=189,500 sf commercial. Trip Generation —ITE Trip Generation Manual (TGM}, 10�' Edition; internal capture and pass-bv rates are considered consistent with ITE and CC TIS Guidelines. Internal Capture —maximum 20%' Pass -by Reduction —Shopping Center — Dai1y15%, AM and PM — 25% TIS will demonstrate that there are no additional traffic impacts above what was it currently allowed. TIS will include trip generation for existirm potential development versus proposed intensi No concurrence LOS and turn lane analyses are presented as part of this TI S. Page 2 of 5 �rebilcock Consulting Solutions, P,4 Page � 15 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUUL — TIS — October 2021 The roadwaim binents that are directly accessed by the proiect are not located within the Collier County's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). In addition, the roposed development is not situated within the County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs). The TCEA's and TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Study Tyae: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ® Minor TIS Major TIS Study Area: Boun(laries: Adiacent streets — Collier Blvd Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Build Out Year: 2026 Plarniing Horizon Year: 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): AM/PM Peak Hour Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual (TGNi), 10°i Edition Reductions u� Trip Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass -by trips: Based on ITE and Collier County TIS Guidelines hiternal trips (MPUD): Based on ITE and Collier County TIS Guidelines Transit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2026 Methodology &Assumptions: Non -site traffic estunates: Collier County traffic counts and 2020 A Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE TGM 10a` Edition Trip distribution method: N/A Tratlic assignment method: N/A Traffic growth rate: N/A Turning movements: N/A Page 3 of 5 1"rebilcoek Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 16 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUD2 — Tls — October 2021 Special reatures: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: N/A On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2020 AUIR: most ctuTent CC Traffic Counts Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: N/A ticcess policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study - No Fee 1 IVlinor Study - 5750.00 Major Study - $1,500.00 Methodology Fee $500 Y Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $SOO.UO each It fees will be agreed to during the dlethodology meeting and mus4 be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. SIGNATURES Norvu.aw Trebi�coc�e Study Preparer—Nonnan Trebilcock Iteviewer(s ) Applicant Page d of 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 17 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiencv review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Studv Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiencv reviewl Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency detennination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off -site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Manor Study Review" - $1,500 Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiencv reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off=site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 5 of 5 Trebilcock C®nsulting Solutions, P,4 Page � 1S Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ - I iS — October 2021 Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Calculations Amerisite CB - GMPA/PUDZ - I IS - October 2021 ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition - Land Use Descriptions Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Description A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. A shopping center's composition is related to its market area in terms of size, location, and type of store. A shopping center also provides on -site parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands. Factory outlet center (Land Use 823) is a related use. Additional Data Shopping centers, including neighborhood centers, community centers, regional centers, and super regional centers, were surveyed for this land use. Some of these centers contained non -merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities (for example, ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf courses). Many shopping centers, in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, it can be assumed that some of the data show their effect. The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the total GLA of the center. In cases of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same as the gross floor area of the building. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/ suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. and 12:15 and 1:15 p.m., respectively. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 27 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.31 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.43 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.46 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 105, 110, 154, 156, 159, 186, 190, 198, 199, 202, 204, 211, 213, 239, 251, 259, 260, 269, 294, 295, 299, 300, 301, 304, 305, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 358, 365, 376, 385, 390, 400, 404, 414, 420, 423, 428, 437, 440, 442, 444, 446, 507, 562, 580, 598, 629, 658, 702, 715, 728, 868, 870, 871, 880, 899, 908, 912, 915, 926, 936, 944, 946, 960, 961, 962, 973, 974, 978 WV Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition •Volume 2: Data •Retail (Land Uses 800-899) 13T Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a � e � 20 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — Tls — October 2021 Land Use: 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Description Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have one or two levels (floors). Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), and off -campus student apartment (Land Use 225) are related land uses. In prior editions of Trip Generation Manual, the low-rise multifamily housing sites were further divided into rental and condominium categories. An investigation of vehicle trip data found no clear differences in trip making patterns between the rental and condominium sites within the ITE database. As more data are compiled for future editions, this land use classification can be reinvestigated. For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. This land use included data from a wide variety of units with different sizes, price ranges, locations, and ages. Consequently, there was a wide variation in trips generated within this category. Other factors, such as geographic location and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip generation. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. For the one site with Saturday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 9:45 and 10:45 a.m. For the one site with Sunday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. For the one dense multi -use urban site with 24-hour count data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 6:15 and 7:15 p.m., respectively. For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.13 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.21 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition •Volume 2: Data •Residential (Land Uses 200-299) 29 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 21 Amerisite CB - 61WA/PUD2 - TIS - October 2021 The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in British Columbia (CAN), California, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ontario, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. !t is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the number of trips generated by a residential site. Many of the studies included in this land use did not indicate the total number of bedrooms. To assist in the future analysis of this land use, it is important that this information be collected and included in trip generation data submissions. Source Numbers 168, 187, 188, 204, 211, 300, 305, 306, 319, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 418, 525, 530, 571, 579, 583, 864, 868, 869, 870, 896, 903, 918, 946, 947, 948, 951 30 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition •Volume 2: Data •Residential (Land Uses 200-299) Trebilcoek Consulting Solutions, PA Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIs — October 2021 Land Use: 151 Mini -Warehouse Description A mini -warehouse is a building in which a number of storage units or vaults are rented for the storage of goods. They are typically referred to as "self -storage" facilities. Each unit is physically separated from other units, and access is usually provided through an overhead door or other common access point. Additional Data Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/ suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 10:30 and 11 s30 a.m. and 1:15 and 2:15 p.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Texas, and Utah. Source Numbers 212, 403, 551, 568, 642, 708, 724, 850, 868, 876 82 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition •Volume 2: Data •Industrial (Land Uses 100-199) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA i Project Name: Amerisite -Allowed Development No: Date: 5/27/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name• Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed + Supplement Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 820 = Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) ,18905 (+1 4643 4642 153 94 419 453 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 696 697 38 24 105 113 Non-pass�by 3947 3945 115 70 314 340 Total 4643 4642 �153 94 419 453 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 696 697 38 24 105 113 TotalNon-pass-by 3947 3945 115 70 314 340 (1 ) t000 sy. Ft GtA Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — 16 — October ZOZ1 Analysis Name Project Name Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD `t"i Daily Amerisite - Allowed Development 5/27/2021 No: City: 21pJPostal Code. Client Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Tlme Period variable 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 189.5 Weekday (General Urban/Suburban) Land Use 820 - Shopping Center Land Use 820 -Shopping Center Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Method Best Fit (LOG) Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X) +5.57 Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed + Supplement Entry Exit Total 4643 4642 9285 50% 60% Entry AdJusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 0 % 4643 0 % 4642 External Trips 9285 Extemal Trips 820 -Shopping Center (General UrbaNSuburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by%for this case. irebilcoek Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 25 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — I JS — October 2021 Analysis Name : AM Peak Hour Project Name : Amerisite - Allowed No Development Date: 5/27/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name. Analyst's Name. Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed + Supplement Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 820 Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 189.5 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LIN) 153 94 247 (General Hour of Adjacent T = 0.5 (X)+151.78 62% 38% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Land Use Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 820 - Shopping Center 0 % 153 0 % 94 T�At, T�tP Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 820 - Shopping Center 247 25 62 185 ITE E AT ION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Extemai Trips 820 -Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 26 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 RIOD SETTING Analysis Name : PM Peak Hour Project Name : Amerisite - Allowed No: Development Date: 5/27/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed + Supplement Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 189.5 Weekday, Peak Hest Fit (LOG) 419 453 872 (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X) 48% 52% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +2.89 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Land Use 820 - Shopping Center Land Use 820 - Shopping Center Entry Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 0% 419 0% 453 External Trips 872 25 Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Extemai Trips 820 -Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Nan -pass -by Trips 654 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 27 V Project Name: Date: State(Province: Country: Analyst's Name: 220 - Multifamily Housing (t.ow-Rise) (General UrbaNSuburban) Reduction Internal Pass -by Non-pass4jy 820 - Shopping Center (General UrbaNSuburban) Reduction Intemai Pass -by Non -pass -by 151 - MiniMarehouse (General UrbaNSuburban) Reduction Internal Pass -by Non -pass -by Totai�� Total Reduction Total internal TotalPass-by Total Non-pass- (1) Dwstling Units (7) 1000 Sq. Ft GLA (3) 9lX>0 Sq. Ft GFA C City: Zip)Postal Code: Cifent Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manuat, 10th Ed + Supplement Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry 1125 1125 32 105 100 0 0 0 0 0 23 11 1 1 23 0 0 0 0 0 1102 1114 31 104 77 2359 2358 116 71 200 0 0 0 0 0 11 23 1 1 10 352 350 29 17 48 1996 1985 86 53 142 64 64 5 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 64 5 4 7 3548 3547 153 180 307 0 0 0 0 0 34 34 2 2 33 352 350 29 17 48 3162 3163 122 161 226 Exit 0 10 0 48 217 0 23 48 146 7 0 0 0 7 282 0 33 48 201 Amerisite CB — GWA/PUD2 — I JS — October 2021 Analysis Name Project Name Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: PERM d SETTING Daily Amerisite - Proposed Development 5128/2021 No: City: Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed + Supplement Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 220 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 303 Weekday Best Fit (LIN) 1125 1125 2250 Housing (Low -Rise) T = 7.56 (X)+-40.86 50% 50% {General Urban/Suburban) 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 70 Weekday Best Fit (LOG) 2359 2358 4717 {General Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X) 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) +5.57 151 - Mini -Warehouse 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 85 Weekday Average 64 64 128 (General 1.51 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) Land Use Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 0 % 1125 0 % 1125 820 - Shopping Center 0 % 2359 0 % 2358 151 - MinkWarehouse 0 % 64 0 % 64 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 820 -Shopping Center Exit 1125 Demand Exit: 1 % (11) eala1ced: pemand Entry: 17 % (401) Entry 2359 Entry 1125 Demand Entry: 2 % (23) Balanced. Demand Exit: 14 % (330) Exit 2358 23 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 151 - Mini -Warehouse Exit 1125 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Baia 0 d. Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 64 Entry 1125 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) 0 Balanced: Demand Exit 0 % (0) Exit 64 820 - Shopping Center 151 - Mini -Warehouse Trebilcock Consulting solutions, PA P a � e (29 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — Tls — October 2021 Exit 2358 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 64 0 Entry 2359 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 64 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Internal Trips Total Trips 820 -Shopping 151 -Mini- Total External Trips Center Warehouse Entry 1125 (100%) 23 (2%) I 0 (0%) 23 (2%) 1102 (98%) Exit 1125 (100%) 11 (1%) 0 (0%) 11 (1%) 1114 (99%) Total 2250 (100%) 134 (2%) 10 (0%) 134 (2%) 2216 (98°l0) 820 - Shopping Center ; Internal Trips Total Trips 220 - Multifamily 151 - Mini- i Total External Trips Housing (Low- ; Warehouse $ Rise) ik Entry 2359 (100%) 11 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (0%) 2348 (100%) Exit ; 2358 (100%) 23 (1%) [ 0 (0%) ' 23 (1%) 2335 (99%) Total 4717 (100%) 34 (1%) 10 (00%) 1 34 (1%) 4683 (99%) 151 - Mini -Warehouse internal Trips Total Trips 220 - Multifamily 820 . Shopping Total External Trips Housing (Low Center, Rise) i Entry 64 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)_. 0 (0%) 64 (100%) Exit 64 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 0 (0%) 64 (100%) Total i 12$ (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (0%) 1128 (100%) land Use 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 820 - Shopping Center 151 - Mini -Warehouse Weekday Landuse Methods No deviations from ITE. No deviations from ITE, External Trips Pass -by% 2216 0 4683 15 128 0 Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 0 2216 702 3981 0 128 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page (30 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — I L5 — October 2021 Weekday External Trips 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 820 - Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Total Entering 3548 Total Exiting 3547 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 34 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 34 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 352 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 350 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 3162 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 3163 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 31 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) PEHRIOD SETTING AM Peak Hour Amerisite - Proposed Development 5/28/2021 KI�k] 820 -Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 70 (General Urban/Suburban) 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 85 No City: Postal Code. Client Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed + Supplement Entry Exit Total Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 32 105 137 Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X) 23% 77% Street Traffic, +451 One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LIN) 116 71 187 Hour of Adjacent T = 0.5 (X)+151.78 62% 38% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Weekday, Peak Average 5 4 9 Hour of Adjacent 0.1 56% 44% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Land Use Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exlt 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 0 % 32 0 % 105 820 - Shopping Center 0 % 116 0 % 71 151 - Mini -Warehouse 0 % 5 0 % 4 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Exit 105 Demand Exit: 1 % (1) Entry 32 Demand Entry: 2 % (1) 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) INTERNAL TRIPS Balanced: 1 Balanced: 1 820 -Shopping Center Demand Entry: 17 % (20) Entry 116 Demand Exit: 14 % (10) Exit 71 151 - Mini -Warehouse Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 32 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — Tls — October 2021 Exit 105 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 5 Entry 32 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced* Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 4 820 - Shopping Center 151 • Mini Warehouse Exit 71 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 5 Entry 116 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced* Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 4 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Internal Trips C Total Trips 820 - Shopping 1151 • Mini- Total External Trips [Center Warehouse i [ Entry 32 (100%) 1 (3%) (0 (0%) E 1 (3%) 1 31 (97%) Exit 1 105 (100%) = 1 (1%) s 0 (0%) 1 (1%) 104 (99%) Total 137 (100%) € 2 (1%) 0 (0%) 1 2 (1%) 135 (99%) mm 820 - Shopping Center j internal Trips _ — --_ Total Trips 220 - Multifamily N 1 151 -Minim € Total I External Trips Housing (Low -Rise) R Warehouse -_ ____-_ __- - - ---- Entry 116 (100%) 1 (1%) 0 (0%) 1 (1%) 115 (99%) Exit p 71 (100%) < 1 (1%) 0 (0%) $ 1 (1%) 70 (99%) mmm Total € 187 (100%) K 2 (1%) 10 (0%) 12 (1%) 1185 (990/0) 151 • Mini -Warehouse Internal Trips Total Trips 220 - Multifamily E 820 - Shopping Total I External Trips Housing (Lowdtise) Center Entry 5 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%) Exit 4 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) (0 (0%) 4 (100%) Total 9 (100%) E O (0°l0) s 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 9 (100%) Land Use 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 820 - Shopping Center 151 - Mini -Warehouse irebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA External Trips Pass-by°!o 135 0 185 25 9 0 Pass -by Trips Non•pasa•by Trips 0 135 46 139 0 9 Amerisite CB — GMPA/POD2 — Tls — October 2021 Weekday, Peak Hour of AdJacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 am. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 820 -Shopping Center (General UrbanlSuburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by°k for this case.. 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General UrbanlSuburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. tit Total Entering 153 Total Exiting 180 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 2 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 2 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 29 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 17 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 122 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 161 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 3� Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — I IS — October 2021 Date: State/Province: Country: Analysts Name: 220 - MulGfamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) PERIOD SETTING PM Peak Hour Amerisite - Proposed Development 5/28/2021 303 820 -Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 70 (General Urban/Suburban) 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA $5 city: Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) Hour of Adjacent Ln(T} = 0.89Ln(X) Street Traffic, +402 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X) Street Traffic, +2.89 One Hour eefinreen 4 and 6 p.m. Weekday, Peak Average Hour of Adjacent 0,17 Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed + Supplement Entry Exit Total 100 58 158 63% 37% 417 14 Land Use Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 0 % 100 0 % 58 820 "Shopping Center 0 % 200 0 % 217 151 - Mini -Warehouse 0 % 7 0 % 7 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Exit 58 Demand Exit: 21 % (12) Entry 100 Demand Entry: 23 % (23) 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Balanced: 10 Balanced: 23 820 -Shopping Center Demand Entry: 5 % (10} Entry 200 Demand Exit: 13 % (28) Exit 217 151 - Mini -Warehouse l"rebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 35 Amerisite CB — 61VIPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 It 58 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: 0 Entry 100 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Balanced: 0 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 7 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 7 820 -Shopping Center 151 - Mini -Warehouse Exit 217 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 7 Entry 200 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 7 220 - Mulfifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Internal Trips i j Total Trips 820- Shopping 151 a Mini- j Total External Trips Center Warehouse War.e. h_o_use nfry100 (100% 3(%) (�(%) 23 (23%_)_ 77, (7_7 , %)t 10 (17%) 48(83%)58(100%) 10(17%)Exit (0%) Total 158 (100%) 33 (21 %) 10 (0%) 33 (21 %) 125 (79%) $20 -Shopping Center intemal Trips _ _ Total Trips 0 m Multifamily j 151 - Mini- Total Extemal Trips Housing (Low -Rise) , Warehouse Entry 200 (100%) 1 10 (5%) s 0 (0%) 10 (5%) 190 (95%) Exit 217 (100%) 23 (11%) j 0 (0%) 23 (11%) 194 (89%) Total J 417 (100%) 33 (8%) 10 (0%) 1 33 (8%) 384 (92%) 151 - Mini -Warehouse Intemai Trips Total Trips 220 - Multifamily i 820 - Shopping Total j External Trips Housing (Low -Rise) I Center i Entry 7 (100%) ` 0 (0%) ; 0 (0%) } 0 (0%) 7 (100%) At 17 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 7 (100%) Total 1 14 (100%) 10 (0%) 10 (0%) 0 (0%) 14 (1000%) Land Use 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 810 - Shopping Center 1 A - Mini -Warehouse External Trips Pass -by% 125 0 384 25 14 0 Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 0 125 96 288 0 14 Trebiicock Consulting Solutions, PA P a � e (36 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ - 115 — October 2021 Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 220 -Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 820 -Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Total Entering 307 Total Exiting 282 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 33 Total Exiting internal Capture Reduction 33 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 48 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 48 Total Entering Nan -Pass -by Trips 226 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 201 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page (37 Amerisite CB — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — October 2021 Proposed GMPA/PUDZ — Truck Rental Facility — Trip generation Trip Generation - Truck Rental Facilities iTE Trip Generation Manual, 14d Edition does not provide traffic data for truck rental facilities. The following assumptions are applied for trip generation purposes: 1. The maximum truck capacity for the proposed facility is 40 trucks. 2. Transactions in the peak hour will account far 20 trucks {50% capacity) — 14 pick-up and 10 returns transactions. Although same customers may elect to park an site, conservatively this report considers that all the customers arrive in a shared ride, taxi or shuttle. Each pick-up transaction will result in 1 arrival trip and 2 departures trips. - Arrival {enter) —customer arrives in a shared ride/ taxi/shuttle —1 trip Departure (exit) — customer and shared ride/taxi/shuttle leave separately — 2 trips Each return transaction will result in 2 arrival trips and 1 departure trip. - Arrival {enter) —customer and shared ride/taxi/shuttle arrive separately — 2 trips Departure (exit) — customer leaves in a shared ride/taxi/shuttle —1 trip 3. Assume an additional 10% increase in trips to account for employees and various vendors. 4. Assume 100 transactions an an average day: 50 pick-up and 5a returns. Development Pick-up Transactions Return Transactions Traffic � Customers Traffic Employees and Vendors Total Traffic 1 •10%of the customer generated traffic. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page (3� Amerisite CB — GMPA1vuDZ — TIS — October 2021 Collier County Transportation Element Map - TR 3.0 lre�ifcac!< Cc,nsuiting Soleat€e��s, PEA Page � 3� V FDOT DISTRICT ONE -MAP B1 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION /URBAN BOUNDARIES -COLLIER COUNTY i �i r,\ Miles ,LEGEND INTERSTATE OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS — OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL --� MINOR ARTERIAL — MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL 2010 SMOOTHED URBANIZED BOUNDARY Q 2010 SMOOTHED SMALL URBAN BOUNDARY RECOMMENDED BY: COLLIER COUNTY MPO DATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF` w TRANSPORTATION DATE APPROVED BY: r ADMINISTRATION DATE FTE 10/31/2013 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Mixed Use Activity Center #7 GMPA (PL-20210001103) Amerisite CB MPUD (PL-20210001104) October 14, 2021, 5:30 PM Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting Room B 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Mixed Use Activity Center #7 GMPA (PL-20210001103) Asite-specific Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of the Mixed Use Activity Center #7 to allow for additional residential development; and 2. Amerisite CB MPUD PUDZ (PL-20210001103) A rezone from C4 General Commercial to the Amerisite CB Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD), to allow for a mix of uses including up to 303 dwelling units, an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45, and C4 and limited C-5 commercial uses Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Applicant: Peter Sulick, Amerisite, LLC Dave Fisher, Latigo Bill Spruce Attendees on Behalf of the Applicant: Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Paula McMichael, AICP, Hole Montes, Inc. Ciprian Malaescu, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Three members of the public attended. Ms. McMichael started the presentation by introducing herself and the other consultants. She then provided a brief history and overview of the project, and the process for approval. Following Ms. McMichael's presentation there was approximately five minutes of questions. The following questions were raised: Intended Use and Application Process An attendee to the meeting questioned what could potentially be constructed and asked for clarification on the two separate application processes. The applicant's consultants responded with explaining how the current zoning permits certain C4 uses, and that the proposed PUD rezone intends to permit those same C4 uses with the addition of gas stations, self -storage and truck rentals, and residential multi -family. The attendee further questioned which development scenario was most likely to be built. The applicant's consultants indicated the 303 multi -family residential development is the most likely Page 1 of 2 H:\2021\2021043\WP\NIM\NIM Summary (11-5-2021).docx to be constructed, depending upon PUD and GMPA approval. Other comments were to compliment the conceptual residential site plan layout and to state preference for that type of use. HousiUrn Types An attendee questioned whether the housing component would be market -rate and whether they would be condominiums or apartments. The contract purchaser for the site, and the applicant's consultants, responded to indicate that the zoning would permit either and the intent is to provide market -rate rental apartments. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:00 PM. Page 2 of 2 H:\2021\2021043\WP\NIM\NIM Summary (11-5-2021).docx PAR`f C7F7F1� t.fSA TC7DA1' hl�TVt,'ORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HOLE MONTES ASSOCIATES INC 950 ENCORE WAY STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34110 ATTN STEPHANIE KAROL Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 9/28/2021 Subscribed and sworn to before on September 28th, 2021 Notary, Count�Brown expires:�j . ��j PUBLICATION COST: $1,045.�0 AD 1\O: GC1073$208 CUSTOMER I�10: 530712 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public Sfiate of Wisconsin The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President, Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on behalf of the property owner at the following time and location: Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting Room B* 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113 *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. The following two concurrent applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management: (1) Mixed Use Activity Center #7 GMPA (PL-20210001104) Asite-specific Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of the Mixed Use Activity Center #7 to allow for additional residential development; and (2) Amerisite CB MPUD PUDZ (PL-20210001103) A rezone from C-4 General Commercial to the Amerisite CB Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), to allow for a mix of uses including up to 303 dwelling units, an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45, and C-4 and limited C-5 commercial uses. These lands total 18.95± acres and are located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the intersection of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. . SUBJECT SITE Naples Lake a Country Club m Y N CL Z x 2 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Physicians Regional Lely Elementary Medical Center School Amerisite CB MPUD Rezone OLEMONTES WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and Collier County staff. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeighborhoodMeeting@hmeng.com and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeeting@hmeng. com. Please reference Mixed Use Activity Center #7 GMPA/Amerisite CB IAPUD PUDZ in subject line. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 N0.G0023820E-01 C ! 1 111 1' ***��ease be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your a -mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Marne Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address i �.dV � Iir�4 Re: Mixed Use Activity Center # 7 Amerisite GMPA (PL-20210001104) & AmeriSite CB MPUD (PL-20210001103) Hm File No.: 2021.043 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President, Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N.C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich &Koester, P.A., have made the following two concurrent applications to Collier County Growth Management: (1) Mixed Use Activity Center #7 GMPA (PL-20210001104) A site -specific Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of the Mixed Use Activity Center #7 to allow for additional residential development; and (2) Amerisite CB MPUD PUDZ (PL-20210001103) A rezone from C-4 General Commercial to the Amerisite CB Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), to allow for a mix of uses including up to 303 dwelling units, an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45, and C-4 and limited C-5 commercial uses. These lands total 18.95� acres and are located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the intersection of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about these amendments and ask questions. T Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 5:30 Room B*, 8065 L Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on .m. at Collier 34113. Tonal Library, Meetin We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at Nei�hborhoodMeeting_(a�hmeng com and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to Nei�hborhoodMeetin�(a�,hmen .com. Please reference Mixed Use Activity Center #7 GMPA/Amerisite CB MPUD PUDZ in subject line. *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me at 239-254-2000. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. ,,. �) Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President, Planning Services Naples � Fort Myers AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. Foy the purposes of this requirement, the names and addNesses of p�ope�ty owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notifzed. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 30th day of September 2021 by means of physical presence or online notarization, by Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., who is personally known to m� Signature Printed or who has produced as identification. Notary Public (Notary Seal) cC �` e of Notary '�*�v ��A`'�;': NotarySPublic NSt to o� Florida �" "`� Commission If GG 9b5839 �'•�OF F;� My Comm. Expires Mar 9, Zd24 �� Bonded through National Notary Assn, H:\2021\2021043\WP\NIIv1\Affidavit of Compliance (9-30-2021).doc 8615 COLLIER -RATTLESNAKE LLC 900 SW PINE ISLAND RD STE 202 CAPE CORAL, FL 33991---0 AMERISITE LLC 3295 FORT CHARLES DR NAPLES, FL 34102---7924 CENTREX CORP LTD 9721 NW 114TH WAY MEDLEY, FL 33178---1178 DJAG 8625 LLC 8625 COLLIER BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 LAKE MICHIGAN CREDIT UNION PO BOX 2848 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501---0 LORDS -WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS: FL 33192---0 ' LOUGHERY, STEPHEN J CHRISTINE F LOUGHERY 3710 SA.PHIRE CGVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0 NAPLES LAKES COMM PROP LLC 2501 S MACDILL AVE TAMPA, FL 33629---0 09�8/09G�2� �aanb oan� aiglt>rdu.loo ulul Lg x Luul 9Z teLuao� ap a�tan;bltg 09;1-8/0919„ �aany UtIM aigl�edulao „g/g Z x „� az{s laq>;I � i., ALI R GHAHRAMANI MD INVESTMENT ; i i� LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ' 7223 AYRSHIRE LN ' BOCA RATON, FL 33496---1421 s i AMERISITE LLC 3295 FORT CHARLES DR NAPLES, FL 34102---7924 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY ' 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 FLORIDA POWER &LIGHT CO PROPERTY TAX-PSX%JB 700 UNIVERSE BLVD JUNO BEACH, FL 33408---2657 � _ __ _ _ __ ^ LORDS WAY 30 LLC i 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33192---0 i _ LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 l LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 i CARMAN DRIVE 15 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 COLLIER RATTLESNAKE LLC 801 ANCHOR RODE DR #206 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 HAMMOCK PARK APARTMENTS 7742 ALICO ROAD FT MYERS, FL 33912---0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD Ff MYERS, FL 33192---0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 ' LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 MATSON III, DUFFIELD W & SARAH 4960 SUNSET DR i MIAMI, FL 33143---0 � i� ,�. _ _�� _ - ( NAPLES LAKES COMM PROF LLC ' I 2501 S MACDILL AVE ' TAMPA, Fl. 33629---0 i �� _ _. _ . _ f label size 1" x 2 5I8" compatible with Avery '25160/81�60 Etimiatte de forma 25 mm x G7 mm compatible avec Avery °5160/8160 MAROLT, JACQUELINE & JOHN J 3706 SAPPHIRE COVL CIR NAPLES FL 34114---0 1' `� i NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---G NAPLES LKS COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 091.8/09 G5®�faany Dane aigl�edu�oo w�u Lg x u�u.i 5Z teLuao� ap at�a�jbit3 09 �8/091^5®�aany u}inn aigl}eduaoo x azls a e «8/5 Z �E � I q i i �=-�-,-. TRACT L DEVELOPMENT LLC `; 7742 ALICO ROAD � East Maples Civic Association � FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 � � PMB #49 i �595 Collier Blvd, Suite 107 i Naples, FL 34114-3556 _; ,,I i j i. �_ . _ _ - - - ,;_ �� l �� ,� � , �� i�� +� �� , t ,, �, ,, �. �� - � - - � � -- label size 1" x 2 5/3" compatible with Avery °51G0/81�60 Gtimiatto rlo format 7� mm v R7 mm rmm�atihlu avAr wnry ��11;f1/R1�;l5 Amerisite CB PUDZ All Mixed Use Activity Center #7 GMPA Neighborhood Information Meeting Thursday, October 14, 2021 PL20210001103 PL20210001104 HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILAHHSWE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS Project Team • Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • Paula McMichael, AICP, Hole Montes, Inc. • Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA • Peter Sulick, Amerisite, LLC • William Spruce, Seawood Builders • Dave Fisher, Latigo Amerisite CB PUDZ & GMPA PL20210001103/PL20210001104 • • • t w.. _. �e Subject Site ME .16 OPO r r } Amerisite CB PUDZ & GMPA PL20210001103/PL20210001104 _ Future Land Use URBAN DESIGNATION URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ] RD F RADIO RD) 0 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BANDS ■COLLIER BLVD. COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT 3LVD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ■ a MIXED USE � ACTIVITY CENTER SUB DISTRICT z m SUBJECT SITE NATURAL RESOURCE m � gI PROTECTION AREA (NRPA) OVERLAY z a in AGRICULTURAL % RURAL p z DESIGNATION I `� 0 m ❑ ~�� Lr INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 41 W RATTLE`NAKE HAMMOCK RD ;D J a SENDING LANDS ®URBAN COASTAL FRINGE r SUBDISTRICT I ®URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE I SUBDISTRICT ESTATES DESIGNATION I ■ HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILAHHSWE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS Mixed Use Activity Center #7 Pup I 1 1 I I 1 PUD I � NNW Mru cawm wla Nemol om� cA su R.TL� wwmw wwo p�y{ P - rAwr. NMWaM Sw A RPUD TIE LOfRn WAY 30 ACRE Subject -- Site C-4 ' MPUD a 000D luRx ceN1Fn 6 u CPUD MPUD NAYYODN PARK LOYYFPOF [EN1R[ MCY 1lLlEN TNCI w MPUD AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 13. 2011 (Ord. No. 2011-26) AMENDED — OCTOBER 25. 2011 (Ord. No. 2011-40) AMENDED — JUL,Y B, 2014 (Ord. No 2014-27) AMENDED - JUNE13,2017 (Ord. No. 2017-22) Pup° °^� LEGEND ACTMTYCENTER BOUNDARY I'l U. 8889 �w.ee.c P RItF41 ENWN7.0 0NN0 § .FP �Ila DIM FNOMcco FOR INFod.IATWN F QSES ONLY: CIA WON M OFNI5w1 . RCF OF 70NNG WMT IS THE ZONING ATLAS SR. WO 15 FF T OF 1,1 cowrn MNW LAND CENELOPNEN7 ccDF; l � ORDNANCE NO 1 41. AS AMCNNk➢.) = DEVELOPED LAND UBE F� (Namr. D,Y .orFD l.'0 IISF. F.17NC WILUNCS AND E7tVC1 RFS TANPIIFO FROM 7015 OFPo i INOTO.) RUC ntaM w.cr PUID rauxx Nmou uNnv MPUD � EmmNDaUIL01N0a AND9TRUCTINEB �PLID NACNTOA I-AAM RIRI I HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILANDSWE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURYLYORS Zoning M � 10 sm BJECTSITE �Aurw Rr r � � $ aY „ ■ M IY a Y Y H IIjII H nAnre. RPUD 1 He wlmarar>to v MPUD° HLaao iu�Er c>:NrsRe 8 „� AgnAP.m u Nmpun., nAERxocK rum oouNIERm cewrar Naruua AEW 1� "M HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILAHHSWE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS Project History • Subject of a GMPA to include entire site within Mixed Use Activity Center #7 (Ordinance 14-28). • Rezoned from C-3 and C-5 to C-4 (Ordinance 14-28). • Approved for a Conditional Use for indoor air- conditioned self -storage buildings (Resolution 2014- 152)11 Amerisite CB PUDZ &GMPA PL20210001103/PL20210001104 Request • Rezone the property from C-4 to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit: • 303 Multifamily Dwelling Units; • an Indoor Air -Conditioned Self -Storage Facility; • Truck Rental and Leasing; • Gasoline Service Stations; and • Other C-4 Commercial Uses. • Amend the Future Land Use Element, Mixed Use Activity Center #7, to permit 303 multifamily dwelling units. HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILAHHSWE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS Master Plan 19.60 HRA�tI97A% �t P) 0.40 2.1% I Totd: 19 100% NATIVE VEGETATION AND OPEN SPACE Existing Native Vegetation 0.40 Acres Minimum On -Site Native Vegetation Preservation Requirements 040 Arres Minimum Open Space Requirement Mixed llse 19 x 309L 5.69 Acres ZONING: A 1236.88' NOTES: 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT MAY BE FULFILLED OFF -SITE. li' -- -------------- 20'WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT- - - - - 20` WIDE UTILITY ERSEMENT�r - I I ii 1 I 1 10' WIDE TYPE "A" LANDSCAPE BUFFER I I � lii I ii � I I 1001li I 1D' WIDE TYPE "A" LANDSCAPE BUFFER HENDERSON , I TRACT CREEK CANAL H (RIGHT-OF-WAY I PRESERVE I i - , POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA I---' }---- _-__-- I is' I F.P.L. EASEMENT' ��RR9Lr l I Ir 20' WIDE TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER I TRACT "MU'" OEM I h ) I PATHWAY MIXED USE r--- - INTERCONNECTION RI , i R I PATHWAY I INTERCONNECTION II I I LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO BE DETERMINED II I I AT TIME OF SDP L--- - - - ---------------------------------- -- 1237.49'(M) INTERCONNECTION Zoning: Good Turn Center - MPUD 950 En— Way R li it A 15' UTILIiY EASEMEW II I 1 I _I 170' ! r z z O IV HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS; LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IPLANNERS I SNRYMRS Conceptual Residential Site Plan ------ ------ CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN LATIGO 10 z I- n z -I m n D n 0 z n m D n D n m ■ DISCLAIMER ACi Alchitec is Oiawings a ceatual a based open p-Amin y data pte a— by i e Ornei- T— s neme nas nni 955 N Pennsylvania Ave- nel been retied pi ese ntea ter scale, level planning a nspottatlen agencies which nn 'led winlet Park. FL 32769. and permitting auiherity n� . da aiepment. ACi p —modes war,anly to the a«n.ataneee a,":,a e';:ese HOLEIVIONTESy draw mgs wfihout a updaieEac—M.d site .away. P: 407.740.9405 ACL ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT 202f, ALL RIGHTS RFSFRVFf7. www.acistudiaS.Com ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS Tors drarinq Is the Urnpear or ACi Archs-tts and an Int—. I at m na ised by r e Owrier soi rots pro3 1 FL Reg- AA0002940 10.11.21 • !II aplogr. N plIIoIIL:11: Ah • AC i "M 12 Conceptual Residential Elevation CONCEPTUAL RESIDENTIAL ELEVATION L LATIGO 54'-8" T.O. ROOF T.O. SLAB DISCLA9MER ACi Archlte cts ❑rawings "I r:o ceptual In nature based upon prellminary data provided by the Owner, This scheme hes 955 N Penn Sylvania Ave, not been vet[e tlnnl presented to stste. local plannlny nr Iran.Furtal— agencies whlch wJH huve levlew Winter park, FL 32739. and psrmltting authority over deve lupmenl. ACI provides no we rranty to the accurateness of the presented drawln9s wIthoat a apd.totl �artlned .ae su�'er, P: 407.740.8405 ACI ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT 2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, www.acistudios,com Tm. d-119 11 the Property of All archuects And an of --e m he used ay Oe owner ro, thls P'oJ— FL Reg, AA0002940 10,11 _21 ■ HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILAHHSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS Conceptual Rendering from Collier Blvd. CONCEPTUAL RENDERING FROM COLLIER BLVD. I LATIGO 11LSCL AT i- ACi Architects ll,awings a,r co ccp[oal m nal... based upon prei�m—y dole p,avmrd by Lhr Owne,. Thla aeheme h" 955 N Pennsylvania Ave. not been vetted nor p,esenlyd le state. local planning — t, ansport-- egen— which will have rev�er and perm1--9 aatharwy oy r days mane nl. ACI pravfdes ne wa —ty to the accnraxeness or the presented Winter Park, FL 32788 d,aw'n V' —vt a vPd e t edec _fieo site --y. P: 407.740.8405 . M Ln D n m n --I C D a- n 0 z n M D n 77 D G� m ffCHITECPSpCOPY RIGHM1[2021. ALL.--- RIGHTSRESERVhOu'ea y ae l].ner ro. mi a f t I W11.3C151IldI15.C1m FL Reg. AA0002940 10.11.21 ■ HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILANOSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURYMRS 13 14 Conceptual Rendering from Collier Blvd. D CONCEPTUAL RENDERING FROM COLLIER BLVD. I LATIGO i— D �O n z M n c D n 0 z n m D n D G) M DISCLAIMER ACi Architects orew,nge ere to teptuel in netnre as:ed npon pr e4im mery ante prn.ided ay the owner_ Thia scheme nns 955 N Pennsylvania Ave. not been rettetl nor presented to state, lecel planning a nspor[ation eg enc�es which will have r Wlnler Park, FL 32789 and permitting aethprity ov r de ve log men[_ ACi provides — wa rrenty to the accurateness of the presen tetl drawing: withept a up det:decertified site --y. P: 407.740.8405 ACI ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT 202T. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. I www_acistadios_com This drawinq Iz rat property et ACC Architects antl an �n strumenr of service to De nnea ay the owner fnr rni: prnjea. FL Reg. AA0002 944 11].11. 1 HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS ILANOSCME ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SUWMRS 15 Process to Amend GMP & Rezone to PUD • Receive staff comments and respond to staff comments. • Hold a Neighborhood Meeting - this meeting. • Receive a "finding of sufficiency, from staff. • Hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission - the planning commission makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. • Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners: • The board decides to approve, approve with conditions, or deny. Amerisite CB PUDZ & GMPA PL20210001103/PL20210001104 16 Questions? ■ HOLEMONTESy ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IPLANNERS I SURVEYORS