Agenda 06/14/2022 Item #17A (Ordinance - Hacienda North CDD)17.A
06/14/2022
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance establishing the Hacienda North Community
Development District located in unincorporated Collier County and containing
approximately 197.82+/- acres; providing for the authority for ordinance; providing for the
establishment of the boundaries for the Hacienda North Community Development District;
providing for the designation of initial board members; providing for the district name;
providing statutory provisions governing the district; providing for consent to special
powers; providing for petitioner's commitments; providing for conflict and severability;
providing for inclusion in the code of laws and ordinances; and providing an effective date.
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners ("Board") to review and consider a
petition for the establishment of the "Hacienda North" Community Development District (CDD)
by adoption of an Ordinance.
CONSIDERATIONS: On February 9, 2022, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida Limited
Liability Company ("Petitioner") filed a petition with the Growth Management Department,
Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, for the establishment of the "Hacienda
North" CDD within the Hacienda Lakes PUD. A mandatory $15,000 application fee was
submitted with the petition.
The Hacienda Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD), located in the Urban Mixed -Use
District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict as depicted in the Future Land Use Map, was
adopted on October 25, 2011, by Ordinance No. 11-41, consisting of 2,262.14+ acres. The
proposed Hacienda North CDD will consist of 197.82+ acres of the Hacienda Lakes PUD.
The site is located in Section 14, Township 50, and Range 26. A map showing the location of the
land area to be serviced by the District appears as Exhibit "1" to the petition. A metes and
bounds description of the proposed CDD can be found in Exhibit "2" of the petition and as to the
Ordinance establishing the CDD.
The proposed CDD includes an area planned for up to 400 residential units, a business park, and
amenities of the approved 1,760 residential units within the Hacienda Lakes PUD. As of the date
of the first of four advertisements required for the establishment of this CDD, no PUD
amendment petitions for this project were filed with Collier County.
By adopting the Ordinance and granting the petition the Board would authorize the District,
through its Board of Supervisors, to manage and finance certain basic infrastructure for the
benefit of the landowners and residents of the "Hacienda North" Development. This
infrastructure, under section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes, includes basic urban systems, facilities,
and services, including water supply, sewers and wastewater management, surface water control
and management (drainage), and roads, bridges, and streetlights. If adopted, this Ordinance
would consent to the further exercise of certain additional special powers authorized by section
190.012(2)(d), Florida Statutes, to plan, establish, acquire, construct, reconstruct, enlarge or
extend, equip, operate and maintain systems and facilities for security, including, but not limited
to, guard -houses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion -detection systems, and patrol cars,
provided however that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the
appropriate local general purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services
within the District boundaries.
Packet Pg. 2276
17.A
06/14/2022
The District Board of Supervisors is initially elected in a property -based election (one -acre, one -
vote), which has been specifically ruled constitutional (State of Florida v. Frontier Acres
Community Development Dist., 472 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1985)). Per Florida Statutes section
190.006(3)(a), after six (6) years of duration, once the District reaches 250 qualified electors, the
positions of two board members whose terms are expiring shall be filled by qualified electors of
the District, elected by the qualified electors of the District for 4-year terms. The Supervisors are
elected on a one -person, one -vote basis by such qualified electors.
In order to provide the basic systems, facilities, and services, the District has certain management
and financing powers. It may only exercise those powers, however, if they comply with certain
strict and detailed procedural requirements including ethics in government, disclosure, conflict of
interest requirements, noticed meetings, government -in -the -sunshine conduct, accounting and
reporting requirements to various local and state agencies, consultants' competitive negotiation
procedures, competitive bidding procedures and others.
So as to provide these systems, facilities, and services, the District also is given certain eminent
domain powers, within tight constraints, as well as the authority to require service charges, fees
or taxes for the various services rendered, ranging from installation of capital facilities to long-
term maintenance and repair. Without the County's consent the aforementioned eminent domain
power is limited to the boundaries of the District.
Accordingly, if Collier County adopts the Ordinance, then it establishes the "Hacienda North"
CDD, as a management tool to benefit both Collier County's existing and future landowners with
pinpointed responsibility for timely, efficient, reliable, and flexible service provision without
burdening the existing taxpayers and financial structure of Collier County. In addition, the
District is also a financing tool, off the balance sheet of the County and the developer. It will
provide long-range and sustained quality service to initial and subsequent landowners without
burdening Collier County and its taxpayers.
Finally, such a District may not outlive its practical utility and usefulness. If at any time during
its existence Collier County determines by a non -emergency Ordinance that it can provide any
one of the District services in a more economical manner, over the long term, at lower cost but
with higher quality, Collier County may then take that service away from the District and
provide the service itself. Additionally, within five (5) years after the effective date of the
Ordinance establishing the District, if a landowner has not received a development permit as
defined in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, on some part or all of the area encompassed by the
District, it will automatically be disbanded by state law. Also, if the District becomes inactive
pursuant to section 189.062, Florida Statutes, Collier County shall be informed of such
occurrence and shall take appropriate action which may include the dissolution of the District.
Finally, if the District has no outstanding financial obligations and no operating or maintenance
responsibilities, upon petition of the District, Collier County may determine by a non -emergency
Ordinance to dissolve the District.
Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, provides that the exclusive and uniform method for
establishment of a CDD of less than 1,000 acres shall be by County Ordinance. Section 190.005,
Florida Statutes, outlines the specific content required in the petition and further outlines six (6)
factors for the Board of County Commissioner is to consider in determining whether to grant or
deny a petition for the establishment of a CDD, as follows:
Packet Pg. 2277
17.A
06/14/2022
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true
and correct.
2. Whether the creation of the District is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
4. Whether the District is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the District.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the District will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate
special -District government.
County legal and planning staff have reviewed the petition and exhibits submitted by the
petitioners (attached) relative to these six (6) factors and have found the proposed Hacienda
North CDD petition to be compliant with each of the six (6) review factors. Staff analysis
relative to the six factors can be found in Attachment 2.
FISCAL IMPACT: As previously noted, a $15,000 filing fee was submitted with the petition.
Exhibit "10" of the petition, "Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs for `Hacienda North'
CDD" delineates the fiscal impacts and timing of impacts to be managed by the District. The
District shall be responsible for actual construction and regulatory costs for "Hacienda North"
CDD. It is noteworthy that the estimated internal infrastructure and services to be financed by the
CDD is $25,188,094.95 consisting of professional and permitting fees, earthwork for stormwater
management, environmental restoration, roadways, off -site road improvements, drainage
systems, sanitary sewer systems, potable water systems, perimeter landscaping, and perimeter
walls. Exhibit "8" of the petition provides a breakdown of estimated costs of each activity.
DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES: According to the petition, the "Hacienda North" CDD, if
the Ordinance is adopted, shall assume responsibility for the actual cost of construction of the
following:
a. Conservation areas, mitigation areas, and wildlife habitat improvements;
b. Earthwork;
c. Wastewater collection;
d. Potable water distribution;
e Stormwater management and drainage;
f. Irrigation quality water distribution;
g. Landscaping and irrigation;
Packet Pg. 2278
17.A
06/14/2022
h. Roadway and entry features.
All construction shall meet state and local standards, including local laws and ordinances, land
development codes, and any other adopted Board policy at the time of permitting and
construction.
"SECTION SEVEN" PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS: The adoption of this Ordinance
is predicated upon the material inducements contained in the foregoing Recital setting forth
Petitioner's Commitments, re -stated as follows: that the Petitioner, its successors and assigns,
shall: (1) elect one resident of the District to the five member Board of Supervisors at such time
as residents begin occupying homes in the District; (2) record a Notice of Assessments
containing the specific terms and conditions of any special assessments imposed to secure bonds
issued by the District, which notice shall be recorded immediately after any such bond issuance;
and (3) file with the Board of Supervisors any and all agreements it has with the County. The
Board shall retain any and all rights and remedies available at law and in equity to enforce
Petitioner's Commitments against Petitioner, its successors, and assigns.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The 197.82+ acres of the "Hacienda North" CDD lies
within the Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, as depicted on the
Collier County Future Land Use Map. Although the establishment of this District does not
constitute any development approval, the plan of development previously approved for the
subject property has been determined to be consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Accordingly, any future petitions for rezone or development permits
will be subsequently reviewed at the time of submittal and will be subject to the requirements
and limitations specified in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and will be
required to be consistent with the GMP in effect at that time.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires a
majority vote for Board approval. -DDP
RECOMMENDATION: To adopt and enact the proposed Ordinance establishing the
"Hacienda North" Community Development District (CDD).
Prepared by Rachel Hansen, Principal Planner
Growth Management Department, Planning & Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning
Section
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Attachment 2 - Six Factors Hacienda North CDD (PDF)
2. Ordinance - 050622 (PDF)
3. [Linked] Hacienda North CDD Full Petition (PDF)
4. Ad - 5.12.22 (PDF)
5. Ad - 5.19.22
(PDF)
6. Ad - 5.26.22
(PDF)
7. Ad - 6.2.22
(PDF)
Packet Pg. 2279
17.A
06/14/2022
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 17.A
Doe ID: 22195
Item Summary: Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida, establishing the Hacienda North Community Development District located in
unincorporated Collier County and containing approximately 197.82+/- acres; providing for the authority
for ordinance; providing for the establishment of the boundaries for the Hacienda North Community
Development District; providing for the designation of initial board members; providing for the district
name; providing statutory provisions governing the district; providing for consent to special powers;
providing for petitioner's commitments; providing for conflict and severability; providing for inclusion in
the code of laws and ordinances; and providing an effective date.
Meeting Date: 06/14/2022
Prepared by:
Title: — Zoning
Name: Rachel Hansen
05/09/2022 10:58 AM
Submitted by:
Title: — Zoning
Name: Mike Bosi
05/09/2022 10:58 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Zoning
Mike Bosi
Zoning Director Review
Zoning
James Sabo
Additional Reviewer
Growth Management Department
Diane Lynch
Growth Management Department
Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management
Kenneth Kovensky
Growth Management Department
Trinity Scott
Transportation
Growth Management Department
James C French
Growth Management
County Attorney's Office
Derek D. Perry
Level 2 Attorney Review
Office of Management and Budget
Debra Windsor
Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review
County Attorney's Office
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review
Office of Management and Budget
Laura Zautcke
Additional Reviewer
County Manager's Office
Amy Patterson
Level 4 County Manager Review
Board of County Commissioners
Geoffrey Willig
Meeting Pending
Completed 05/11/2022 12:48 PM
Completed 05/11/2022 4:13 PM
Completed 05/12/2022 11:15 AM
Additional Reviewer Completed
Skipped 05/10/2022 3:54 PM
Completed 05/26/2022 6:06 PM
Completed 06/02/2022 6:32 PM
Completed 06/03/2022 8:41 AM
Completed 06/03/2022 11:30 AM
Completed 06/03/2022 12:42 PM
Completed 06/08/2022 2:44 PM
06/14/2022 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 2280
17.A.1
ATTACHMENT 2
STAFF ANALYSIS RELATIVE
TO THE SIX (6) FACTORS
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FORMATION
FOR "HACIENDA NORTH" CDD
Background:
Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, outlines the specific content required in a Community
Development District (CDD) petition and further outlines six (6) factors for the Board of County
Commissioners to consider in determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the
establishment of a CDD, as follows:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true
and correct.
2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate
special -district government.
Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the six factors referenced above and makes the
following findings with regard to the proposed Hacienda North Community Development
District:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and
correct.
Comprehensive Planning staff, along with the staff of the County Attorney's Office, has
reviewed the referenced Community Development District petition. Based upon the review of
the petition and sufficiency information, staff believes that the information found within these
documents appears to be true and correct.
2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
1
Packet Pg. 2281
17.A.1
The proposed Hacienda North CDD is located within the Hacienda Lakes P.U.D. is also an
approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI Ordinance No. 2011-41) originally approved
by the Board of County Commissioners in 2011. As part of the approval process, the
development was found to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan in effect at that time.
The proposed CDD is designated Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict per the Collier County Future Land Use Map. The proposed CDD would be a unit of
local government established specifically for the purpose of carrying out the approved Master
Development Plan and commitments of the Hacienda Lakes Development. The CDD does not
authorize any form or amount of development not previously approved by the Board of County
Commissioners. Therefore, staff finds that the establishment of the CDD is consistent with the
Collier County Growth Management Plan.
As to consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan, the County staff notes that the CDD
process is established within Section 190 of the Florida Statutes. The petitioner has not deviated
from the standard process, as established by the Statute. Section 187.201, Florida Statutes,
contains the text of the State's Comprehensive Plan. Subsection (2)(a) is the State Plan Goal for
Governmental Efficiency, which reads as follows:
"Goal. --Florida governments shall economically and efficiently provide the amount and
quality of services required by the public."
Policy 2 within this goal area reads as follows:
"2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts which have uniform
general law standards and procedures and do not overburden other governments and their
taxpayers while preventing the proliferation of independent special taxing districts which do not
meet these standards."
As an "independent special taxing district", the proposed CDD is consistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
The proposed Hacienda North Community Development District, if approved, would be within
the size range of several other CDDs within Collier County at 197.82± acres. For instance, the
Key Marco CDD comprises 174.00± acres, while the Orange Blossom Ranch CDD comprises
219.79± acres. The neighboring Hacienda Lakes CDD comprises 391.06± acres. Based upon
previous experience and the subsequent success of other Collier County CDDs, Comprehensive
Planning Department staff believes that the Hacienda North Community Development District
meets the above criteria.
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district.
2
Packet Pg. 2282
17.A.1
As noted within Exhibit "10" of the CDD petition, there are numerous alternatives available for
the provision of infrastructure and services by and for an approved development. These include,
but are not limited to the following: private funding procured by the developer; establishment of
a homeowners association; establishment of a Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU);
establishment of a Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU); establishment of a Community
Improvement District (limited to drainage and irrigation related improvements); establishment of
a County -managed special purpose district; or, direct County management. All of these
alternative options have various legal, financial or other limitations on their operations or do not
provide a focused, compact approach to the provision of infrastructure and services. Therefore,
staff finds that establishment of the proposed CDD is the best alternative available for delivering
community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the proposed
district.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
The proposed CDD cannot develop any facilities and services that are incompatible with the
surrounding area. This is because the CDD's sole purpose is to implement conditions and
developer commitments that were part of the original P.U.D. and DRI approvals. The District
Board of Supervisors will not have the legal authority to implement any facilities, services or
development that would be inconsistent with its existing development approvals.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special -
district government.
Based upon staff findings concerning the previous five criteria, Comprehensive Planning
Department staff finds that the subject area for the proposed CDD is amenable to special district
government. Furthermore, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the
Ordinance, as contained in Attachment 1, establishing the Hacienda North Community
Development District.
3
Packet Pg. 2283
17.A.2
ORDINANCE NO.2022 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE HACIENDA
NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED IN
UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY AND CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 197.82+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE
AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HACIENDA
NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR
THE DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR
THE DISTRICT NAME; PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS
GOVERNING THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO
SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR PETITIONER'S
COMMITMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND
ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Gregory L. Urbancic, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on
behalf of Petitioner, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, has
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida ("Board"), a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the Hacienda North Community Development
District ("District"); and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice has
conducted a public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the factors
to be considered in section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, as required by section 190.005(2)(c),
Florida Statutes:
1. The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of section 190.005,
Florida Statutes, and all statements contained within the petition are true and
correct.
2. Establishment of the proposed District is not inconsistent with any applicable
element or portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as the
Collier County Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan.
3. The area of land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently
compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional
interrelated community.
4. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community development
services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District.
[22-CMP-01124/1718479/11 Page 1 of 5
Packet Pg. 2284
17.A.2
5. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special -district
government; and
WHEREAS, it is the policy of this State, as provided for in section 190.002(2)(c), Florida
Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general
law comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing
planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to ensure that neither
the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers
governing development; and
WHEREAS, section 190.004(3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental planning,
environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development
of the land within a community development district. Community development districts do not
have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building code, or land
development code, as those terms are defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no action which is inconsistent with
applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of the applicable local general-purpose
government; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to sections 190.012(2)(a) and (2)(d), Florida Statutes, in connection
with the establishment of the proposed community development district, the petition further seeks
the consent from Collier County for the grant of authority to exercise special powers without
question as to the continued right authority and power to exercise its limited powers as established
by this Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE: AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE
This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, and other
applicable provisions of law governing county ordinances.
[22-CMP-01124/1718479/1] Page 2 of 5
Packet Pg. 2285
17.A.2
SECTION TWO: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HACIENDA
NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
The Hacienda North Community Development District is hereby established within the
boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
reference herein.
SECTION THREE: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS
The following five persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board
of Supervisors:
1. Maritza Aguiar
7742 Alico Road
Ft. Myers, FL 33912
3. Gary Hains
7742 Alico Road
Ft. Myers, FL 33912
5. Clifford Olson
1164 Goodlette Road
Naples, FL 34102
SECTION FOUR: DISTRICT NAME
2. Dwight Nadeau
3450 W. Crown Point Blvd. #101
Naples, FL 34112
4. Robert Mulhere
950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 34110
The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known as the
"Hacienda North Community Development District."
SECTION FIVE: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT
The Hacienda North Community Development District shall be governed by the provisions
of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law.
SECTION SIX: CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS
Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the Hacienda North Community Development
District will be duly and legally authorized to exist and exercise all of its powers as set forth in
section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes, and as otherwise provided by law. Further, the Board hereby
consents to the exercise by the Board of Supervisors of the District of the special powers set forth
[22-CMP-0 1124/1718479/11
Page 3 of 5
Packet Pg. 2286
17.A.2
in sections 190.012(2)(a) and (2)(d), Florida Statutes, to plan, establish, acquire, construct or
reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities for:
(i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; and (ii)
security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion -detection
systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; provided, however
that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local
general-purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District
boundaries.
SECTION SEVEN: PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS
The adoption of this Ordinance is predicated upon the material inducements contained in
the foregoing Recital setting forth Petitioner's Commitments, re -stated as follows: that the
Petitioner, its successors and assigns, shall (1) elect one resident of the District to the five member
Board of Supervisors at such time as residents begin occupying homes in the District, and (2)
record a Notice of Assessments containing the specific terms and conditions of any special
assessments imposed to secure bonds issued by the District, which notice shall be recorded
immediately after any such bond issuance. The Board shall retain any and all rights and remedies
available at law and in equity to enforce Petitioner's Commitments against Petitioner, its
successors and assigns.
SECTION EIGHT: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion.
SECTION NINE: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or
[22-CMP-01124/1718479/1] Page 4 of 5
Packet Pg. 2287
17.A.2
relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article,"
or any other appropriate word.
SECTION TEN: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, this 14th day of June 2022.
ATTEST:
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Derek D. Perry
Assistant County Attorney
[22-CMP-01124/ 1718479/ 1 l
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
I0
Page 5 of 5
William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman
n
Packet Pg. 2288
17.A.2
r
2
�L
N
C
r
C
d
E
Q
O
d
EX IBIT
d
0
"A"
C
7
E
O
V
t
O
Z
co
C
O
co
2
LO
Cn
T—
N
N
N
N
w
O
LO
O
U
C
f0
C
E
L
0
r_
O
E
t
u
2
Q
Packet Pg. 2289
17.A.2
RffODES &RHODESLAND SURVEYING, INC.
28100BONM GR9NDEDRME #107 NAPLES, FLORMA 34135
P1Tom (m) 411r8166 FA%( V) 40 -8163
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21 (INCLUSIVE) OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING ALL OF TRACT FD-1, HACIENDA LAKES OF
NAPLES - PHASE II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 61, PAGES 16
AND 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF
SECTIONS 13,14 AND 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21
(INCLUSIVE) OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: SOUTH
00050'27" WEST, 344.07 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 00049'30" WEST, 255.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 89°10'15" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 563.89 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 182.19 FEET ALONG THE
ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 530.00 FEET, THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19041'43" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 79019'24"
EAST, 181.29 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 23.37 FEET ALONG
THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38015'49" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 88036'27" EAST, 22.94 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 95.07
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°31'14" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT
BEARS SOUTH 82058-44" EAST, 92.14 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY, 212.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21024-22"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 47030'56" EAST, 211.72 FEET TO A POINT
OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY, 91.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR
CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
47042'50" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 1205720" EAST, 88.98 FEET TO
A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY, 29.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 48016'55" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 13014'22" EAST, 28.63
FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, 198.92 FEET ALONG THE
ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 220.00 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51048'25" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 6301702" EAST, 192.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89011'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.82 FEET TO A
POINT OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF A 170.00 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 673, PAGE 1843 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 00048'45" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF AN EXISTING 170.00 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, AS
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 668, PAGE 1751 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 708.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT
FD-2; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FIFTEEN (15) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID
TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 87°25'45" EAST, 2,004.48 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 0014737"
WEST, 671.11 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 87027'14" EAST, 668.22 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH
00°47' 14" WEST, 671.39 FEET; COURSE NO.5: NORTH 87028'42" EAST, 1,336.55 FEET; COURSE (6) NORTH
87-30-06" EAST, 504.61 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 7:
SOUTHERLY, 166.87 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING
A RADIUS OF 9,860.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00-58'11" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY
Z:\HACIENDA LAKES\HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES NORTH CDD\2021-858 LEGAL
DESCRIPTION.docx
Page 1 of 4
Packet Pg. 2290
17.A.2
IRHODES & RHODESLAND SURVEYING, INC.
28100BONP!A 11R9NDEDAME #107 N9PL TJ FLORMA 34IN
PS01VE( W) 40158166 FAX(M) 40158163
A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 16032' 15" WEST, 166.87 FEET; COURSE NO. 8: SOUTH 16°03'09" WEST,
370.15 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO.9: SOUTHWESTERLY, 788.77 FEET ALONG THE
ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,580.00 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28036'11" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 30021' 15" WEST, 780.60 FEET; COURSE NO. 10: SOUTH 44°39'20" WEST, 705.32 FEET; COURSE NO.
11: NORTH 45°20'40" WEST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 12:
SOUTHWESTERLY, 146.11 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,390.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03030'10"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 42054'15" WEST, 146.09 FEET; COURSE
NO. 13: SOUTH 48050'49" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO.
14: SOUTHERLY, 1,669.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,370.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40-21-59" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 20.58' 11" WEST,1,635.40 FEET; COURSE NO. 15: SOUTH
0004707" WEST, 127.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT FD-2; THENCE
SOUTH 87037'31" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2, A DISTANCE OF
20.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT FD-1, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES - PHASE
II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 61, PAGES 16 AND 17 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5)
COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-1; COURSE NO. 1: SOUTH 00°47'12" WEST,
820.13 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: NORTH 89012'48" WEST, 120.00 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 00°47'12"
EAST,163.01 FEET; COURSE NO.4: SOUTH 87°37'31" WEST, 20.03 FEET; COURSE NO. 5: NORTH 00°47' 14"
EAST, 650.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT FD-1, ALSO BEING THE
SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT FD-2 OF AFORESAID HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES PLAT;
THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-
2 OF LAST SAID PLAT; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00°47'14" EAST, 136.36 FEET TO A POINT OF
CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 2: NORTHERLY, 1,302.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,
CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
29030'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 15°32'13" EAST, 1,288.33 FEET;
COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 87°33'06" EAST, 5.70 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: NORTH 00°47'03" EAST, 671.53 FEET;
COURSE NO. 5: SOUTH 87131'38" WEST, 334.19 FEET; COURSE NO. 6: SOUTH 89°44'23" WEST, 134.31
FEET; COURSE NO.7: NORTH 04044'35" WEST, 0.82 FEET; COURSE NO.8: SOUTH 879 P38" WEST, 105.71
FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 9: WESTERLY, 181.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 940.00 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11003'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 81059'59"
WEST, 181.09 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 10: WESTERLY, 192.95 FEET
ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,000.00
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11003'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT
BEARS SOUTH 81059'59" WEST, 192.65 FEET; COURSE NO. 11: SOUTH 8791'38" WEST, 598.35 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS DESCRIBED AS "AMENDED AND RESTATED
NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OF HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (NOTICE
OF AMENDED BOUNDARIES)" AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5500, PAGE 3229 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF LAST SAID LANDS; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 04°34'13" WEST,
60.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 2: NORTHWESTERLY, 56.98
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93016'33" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT
BEARS NORTH 45050'05" WEST, 50.89 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 89°11'49" WEST, 80.00 FEET;
COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH 00148'11" WEST, 8.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 5:
SOUTHWESTERLY, 52.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE
NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°43'27"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 44009'55" WEST, 48.06 FEET; COURSE NO.
6: SOUTH 87°31'38" WEST, 17.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS
DESCRIBED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5456, PAGE 1683 OF THE PUBLIC
Z:\HACIENDA LAKES\HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES NORTH CDD\2021-858 LEGAL
DESCRIPTION.docx
Page 2 of 4
Packet Pg. 2291
17.A.2
-RHODES &RMDESLAND SUR KE MVGZ; INO
A91MBaHIrA a lAADRDlUM ploy NAPLEK AVLO.RIDd 80M
PffaW (,V) daF-8lM FAS(AAW) AtF-810
RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES
ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF LAST SAID LANDS; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00'48'11" EAST, 200.33 FEET;
COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 8791'38" WEST, 289.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF AFORESAID
TRACT FD-2; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID
TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00'48'11" EAST, 1,111.00 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 87°28'42"
WEST, 1,002.41 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 00°48'45" EAST, 335.13 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH
8702758" WEST, 857.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02031' 19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 104.67 FEET TO A POINT
ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 190.42 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 105.00 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 103054'28" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 51057'14"
EAST, 165.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02°31'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 234.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A
NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 110.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.00 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66046'31" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 34013,00"
EAST, 104.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00049'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89010'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 545.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
TRACT FD-2; THENCE NORTH 00049'30" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT
FD-2, A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 8,617,083 SQUARE FEET OR 197.821 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Z:\HACIENDA LAKES\HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES NORTH CDD\2021-858 LEGAL
DESCRIPTION.docx
Page 3 of 4
Packet Pg. 2292
17.A.2
. IIw
NW CORNER OF TRACT =i
FD-2. HACIENDA LAKES it
OF NAPLES ii vi
REMAINDER
TRACT FD-2 Jl
(P.B. 55, PAGE 10)
L50 CO211
19 GG
GO
L57
C25-
o
F
�
VACANT
(UNPUTTED)
�I3
15.0' U.E.
OR 3910 PG. 3745
OR 4631 PG. 1103
O.R. 5341 PG. 824
AS AFFECTED BY
O.R. 5928, PG. 1-9
(UNPLATTED)
COWER COUNTY 100' CANAL
R/W PER STATE OF FLORIDA
STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT
R/W MAP ROAD S-951 SECT.
03510-2102 NOTE 1D0' WIDE
STRIP OUIT CUM DEED TO
yl
LOWER COUNTY O.R. 21 PG.
183
80' INGRESS/ECRESS� i
BP., y
P
ONOR,R. 08, PC. 4012 5
(THE LORDS WAY) d
ABBREVIATIONS
BOB BASIS OF BEARING
C/L CENTERLINE
FPL - FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT
P.B. PUT BOOK
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
PG.. - PAGE
P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
AND MAPP
R/W a RIGHT OF SWAY LINE
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH I
BEARING
L8
708.91' 1
N DO'48'45" E
L9
671.1 V I
S 0 '47'3 " W
L10
668.22'
N 7 7'14' E
Lit
67 .39' 1
S '47' 4" W
L12
504.61' 1
N 7.30'06" E
L13
370.15'
S 16'03' 9' W
L14
705.32'
S 44'3 ' 0" W
L15
20.00' 1
N 45'20'40" W
L18
0.00' 1
S 48'5'49"
L17
27.52' 1
S 00'47' "
LIS
20.03' 1
S 87-37' "
US
820.13'
00.47' " WL
L20
1 0.00'
N 89 '
L21
163.01'
00'47' "
L22
20.03' 1
S 87'37' "
L23
650.49' 1
N 00'47' "
L24
3 36' 1
N 00'47'14"
L25
5.70' 1
N 87*33'06' E
L26
7.5'
1 N 7' "E
L27
334.19'
1 S 87-31.38" W
L28
134.31'
1 S 89'44' "
L29
0.82'
1 N 04*44*35"
L30
105.71'
1 S 87*31'38"
L31
598.35'
1 S 87'31' "
L32
60.04'
1 N 04'34'13' W
L33
.00'
1 N 8911'49" W
L34
.59'
1 S 00' '1 " W
L35
7.0 '
1 S 7'31' 8" W
L36
200
N 0 '48' "
L37
9.47'
1 S 87'31'.38"
111.00'
0.48' 1" E
1002.41'
S 87'28'42" W
S 00.50'27" W
S 0 '49' "S
F
89 'S
" E
X31S_
N 00'S
7'S8" W
N 0 '31'19" W
L55
N 1'19' W
L56
N 00'49'45"
L57
545 O6'
N 891015"
(UNPLATTED)
(BOB)
N 87*25'45"
170.0' FPL
OR 668 PG. 1751
SPLIT LINE
FOR FPL
EASEMENTS
L51 170.0' FPL
OR 673 PG. 1843
BOUNDARY
TRACT FD-2
S. LINE N.W. 1/4 .l
O.R. 5957
PG. 2583
(UNPLATTED)
PG.
S, LINE N.W.
I
S. 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 11
N. 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 14 i
E 2004.48' - _ .. _ .. _ .. ,.
UARY
TRACNTD'T
OJ1 (UNPLATTED)
b�IIbI L10
NORTHEAST /T OF THE
\� NORTHEAST 0-
SECTION 14-50-26
zIi BOUNDARY (UNPLATTED)
TRACT FD-2 J
,,J. N 87"28'42" E 1336.55' . L12
-�I S UNE N.E 1/4 N
PORTION OF
TRACT FD-2
F I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
HACHMA LAUB OF
NAPLEB
(P.O. 55, PAGE 1D)
REIWNDER OF \ 5500.
TRACE FD-2
MURE DEVELOPMENT PG. 3229
HACIENDA LAVES OF NAPLEe it
(P.B. 55, PACE 10) p
BOUNDARY
TRACT FD-2
(UNPLATTED)
NOTES
SOUTHERLY
1. BEAR/TUGS SF/OINV HEREON
BOUNDARY t
ARE BASED ON THE NORTH UNE
TRACT FD-2 u�
OF TRACT FD-2 HACIENDA
LAKES al NAPLES PLAT BOOK
NW CORNER y
55, PAGES 10 IHROUGH 21
TRACT FD-1 N
(INCLUSIV£J OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS COLLIER COUNTY,
S.W. CORNER J
TRACT FD-2
FLOR/DA• AS BEING NORTH
BOUNDARY 18
8775'45" EAST AND RELATE 70
TRACT FO-1
THE STATE PLANE COGRDINA 7E
SYSTEM ESTABLISHED BY THE
HACIENDA LASES OF
NA RONAL CEDOERC SURVEY FOR
NAPLES PHASE D J
FLORIDA EAST ZONE, 1963
(P.O. 5% PAGE 16-17) l22
DATUM INTH 1990 ADJUS7MENT.
2. SUB„ECT 70 EASEMENTS
77CVVS AND
T0VA ,PRAC-T L-I N
-ES AKE RA
R�C77ONS Oc' RECORD.
MOCK
RggO TRACT
J. UNE NUMBERS L1-L7,
ESPLANADE AT
L40-L47 AND L59-L61 NAY£
HACIENDA LAKES
BEEN INTENRa✓ALLY DELETED.
PHASE ONE
(P.B. 62. PAGE 13-21)
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION AC EBB
EASEMENT
(O.R. 5149 PAGE 661)
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
DELTA
LENGTH
CHORD
CHORD BEARING
CIO
0 8'11"
66.87'
166.87'
6'3 '15'
C11
'36'11"
88.77'
7 0.6 '
30*21'1 "
C12
'10'
146.11'
46.09'
42'54' "
C13
'59"
6 .72'
63 .40'
20'58' 1"
C14
F2530.00
9.30'04"
13 22.67'
1288.3 '
N 15'3 '13"C15
1 '03'1 "
181. 7'
181
81.59'59'c18
11.03,18"
192.9 '
192.6 '
8 '59'59" W
C17
93'16'3 '
56. 8'
50.89'
N 45.50'05" W
C18
35.00
8 '43'27"
52.98'
48.06'
S 4 '09'S "
C19
530.00
9' 1'43"
102.19'
181.29'
S 7919' 4'
C20
35.00
15'49"
23.37'
22.94'
S 88'3 ' " E
C21
110.00
4 631'14"
95.07'
92.14'
S 82'58'44"
C22
570.00
1 4'22"
12.96'
211.72'
S 47'30'5" E
C23
110.00
47'42' 0'
.6 '
88.98,
S 12'5' 0'
C24
35.00
48 ' 5'
.49'
2 . 3'
1 4'2 " E
C25
220.00
51'48'25"
198.92'
192.22'
S 6317'02" E
C26
105.00
03'54' '
190
165. '
N 5 7' 4" E
C27
95.00
66' '3 "
1
104 8'
N 4 0"
S.
♦F+
�7
W;
U cFi
7I7
(UNPLATTED) ,
�S�N
TRACT' FD-2
AZURE AT
HACIENDA LAXIS OF
NAPLES PHASE D
(P.B. $2. PAGE 13-21)
0 200 400 Boo 1600
GRAPHIC SCALE
*NOT A SURVEY*
L58 160.00' '49'30" John Scott Rhodes PSM If oNV Mne0039'°^"u°"
BY: 5739StateafFI.,Id1 JOHN SCOTT RHODES PSM #5739
ate: SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION eslgn:
RHODES & RHODES TAN. 12 2022
LAND S(/RVEriNG INC scale: drawn:
a
1" = CERTIFIED TO:
800' rwc
LICENSE JLB 6897 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, C. EFC /
cogo #1 /A
c ece:
JSR
28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE SUITE 107 V1eW: pro�ec e s ee
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 kacad
- 58 PLOT zo21-Bee file
#: ae 4 o Packet P 2293
(239) 405-8166 (239) 405-8163 FAX g
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PETITION FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAMED
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.005(2), FLORIDA STATUTES
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
("Petitioner") petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") to adopt an ordinance for the following purposes: (i)
establishing and recognizing a community development district ("District") created and
chartered by the Uniform Community Development District Act of Florida, Chapter 190, Florida
Statutes on the real property proposed in this Petition; (ii) acknowledging that the uniform
charter contained in Sections 190.006 through 190.041, Florida Statutes, and as referenced by
Section 190.004(4), Florida Statutes shall apply to the District; (iii) designating the initial Board
of Supervisors for the District; (iv) designating the proposed land area within which the District
may manage and finance its basic infrastructure systems, facilities, services, improvements and
projects; (v) consenting to the exercise by the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(a), Florida
Statutes of the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend,
equip, operate and maintain additional systems and facilities for parks and facilities for indoor
and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; and (vi) consenting to the exercise by
the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(d), Florida Statutes of the power to finance, fund,
plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain
additional systems, facilities and basic infrastructure for security, including, but not limited to,
guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion -detection systems, and patrol cars, when
authorized by proper governmental agencies; provided, however that the District may not
exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general purpose
government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District's boundaries; and
In support thereof, Petitioner submits as follows:
1. Location and Size. The proposed District is located entirely within unincorporated
in Collier County, Florida, and contains approximately 197.82 acres. A map showing the general
location of the District is attached as Exhibit 4".
2. Legal Description. A metes and bounds legal description and accompanying
sketch of the external boundaries of the proposed District is attached as Exhibit "2". There is no
real property within the boundaries of the District that is to be excluded from the jurisdiction of
the District.
3. Landowner Consent. At the time of this Petition, all of the land to be included in
the proposed District is owned by Petitioner. Attached as Exhibit 113A" is the written consent to
establishment of the District by Petitioner, who is the owner or controller of 100% of the real
property to be included in the land proposed to be serviced by the District. A copy of the deed
1
evidencing title of the real property to be included in the District in the name of Petitioner is
attached as Exhibit "3B".
4. Name. The proposed name of the District to be established is Hacienda North
Community Development District (the "District"). The District charter shall be a uniform
charter created expressly in general law in Sections 190.006 through 190.041, Florida Statutes.
5. Initial Board Members. The five (5) persons designated as the initial members of
the Board of Supervisors of the proposed District, who are citizens of the United States and
residents of the State of Florida, and who shall serve in that office until replaced by elected
members, as provided in Section 190.006, Florida Statutes, are:
(1) Maritza Aguiar
7742 Alico Road
Ft. Myers, FL 33912
(2) Dwight Nadeau
3450 W. Crown Point Blvd. #101
Naples, FL 34112
(3) Gary Hains
7742 Alico Road
Ft. Myers, FL 33912
(4) Robert Mulhere
950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 34110
(5) Clifford Olson
1164 Goodlette Road
Naples, FL 34102
6. Existing Land Uses. The existing land uses within and abutting the proposed
District are depicted on Exhibit "4". The adjacent property to the west is zoned ROW. The
adjacent property to the east is zoned RPUD. The adjacent property to the north is zoned RPUD.
The adjacent property to the south is zoned PUD and MPUD. The lands within the proposed
District are zoned MPUD.
7. Future Land Uses. The future general distribution, location and extent of the
public and private land uses proposed within the District are shown on Exhibit "5". These
proposed land uses are consistent with the state comprehensive plan and Collier County
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development of the lands within the District contemplates
the construction of approximately 400+/- residential units, a business park, and supporting
infrastructure on 197.82 acres. The County Future Land Use Element designates the land
contained within the proposed District as urban residential fridge subdistrict. Exhibit "6" shows
the proposed development plan for the lands within the District. Included as part of Exhibit 6 are
2
also the following proposed plans (all preliminary and subject to change): Proposed Stormwater
Plan attached as Exhibit 116A11; Proposed Wastewater Plan attached as Exhibit "6B11; Proposed
Potable Water Plan attached as Exhibit "6C"; and Proposed Irrigation Quality Water Plan
Exhibit "6D". The actual development plans may vary due various factors including, without
limitation, potential future changes in economic conditions including market demand and cost.
8. Major Water and Wastewater Facilities. Exhibit "7" shows the existing major
trunk water mains and sewer connections serving the lands within the District. Exhibit "7" also
depicts the major outfall canals and drainage system for the lands within the proposed District.
9. District Facilities and Services. The Petitioner presently intends for the District to
participate in the funding and construction of improvements including the following:
a. Conservation areas, mitigation areas, and wildlife habitat improvements;
b. Earthwork;
C. Wastewater collection;
d. Potable water distribution;
e Stormwater management and drainage;
f. Irrigation quality water distribution;
g. Landscaping and irrigation; and/or
h. Roadway and entry features.
Exhibit "8" describes the type of services and facilities Petitioner presently expects the District
to fund, construct and install. The estimated costs of construction are also set forth in Exhibit
"8". The proposed timetable for construction is shown in Exhibit "9". These are good faith
estimates but are subject to change. Actual construction timetables and expenditures will likely
vary, due in part to the effects of future changes in economic conditions upon costs such as labor,
services, materials, interest rates and market conditions.
10. Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. A Statement of Estimated Regulatory
Costs ("SERC") of the Commission's granting of the Petition, and the establishment of the
District pursuant thereto, in accordance and in compliance with Sections 190.005(1)(a)(8) and
120.541, Florida Statutes, is attached as Exhibit "10".
11. Petitioner and Authorized Agent. The Petitioner is HACIENDA LAKES OF
NAPLES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 7742 Alico Road, Fort
Myers, Florida 33912. Copies of all correspondence and official notices should also be sent to
the authorized agent for the Petitioner:
Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
Attn: Gregory L. Urbancic, Esq.
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
Phone: (239) 435-3535
Fax: (239) 435-1218
Email: gurbancic&cyklawfirm.com
12. Consent to Special Powers. Pursuant to Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes,
Petitioner additionally requests that the ordinance establishing the District also consent to the
exercise by the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(a) and (d), Florida Statutes of the power
to finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip,
operate and maintain additional systems, facilities and basic infrastructure for the following: (i)
parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; and (ii)
security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion -
detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; provided,
however that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the
appropriate local general purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services
within the District's boundaries.
13. Summary. This petition to establish the Hacienda North Community
Development District should be granted for the following reasons:
a. The Petitioner hereby affirms that all of the statements contained herein
are true and correct, in compliance with Sections 190.005(2)(a) and 190.005(1)(e), Florida
Statutes.
b. Establishment of the District and all land uses and services planned within
the proposed District are not inconsistent with applicable elements or portions of the effective
State Comprehensive Plan or the Collier County Comprehensive Plan.
C. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a planned
community. It is of a sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be developed
as one functional and interrelated community.
d. The establishment of the District will prevent the general body of
taxpayers in the County from bearing the burden for installation of the infrastructure and the
maintenance of certain facilities within the development encompassed by the District. The
District is the best alternative for delivering community development services and facilities to
the proposed community without imposing an additional burden on the general population of the
local general-purpose government. Establishment of the District in conjunction with a
comprehensively planned community, as proposed, allows for a more efficient use of resources.
e. The community development services and facilities of the District will not
be incompatible with the capacity and use of existing local and regional community development
services and facilities. In addition, the establishment of the District will provide a perpetual
entity capable of making reasonable provisions for the operation and maintenance of the
District's services and facilities.
f. The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate
special district government.
IFI
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Commission to do the following:
a. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local, public, non -
emergency and information gathering public hearing for the adoption of an ordinance hearing
pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.005(2)(b), Florida Statutes, on the subject of whether
to grant this Petition for the establishment on the proposed land area of Hacienda North
Community Development District and to enact the ordinance establishing the District.
b. Grant this Petition and adopt the ordinance to establish the District
including the following: (i) a designation in the ordinance of the land to be served by the District;
(ii) the name of the District; (iii) the initial Board of Supervisors of the District; (iv) a
recognition in the ordinance, by statutory citation, that the uniform and exclusive general law
charter of the District was created by the Florida Legislature in Sections 190.006 through
190.041, Florida Statutes; and (v) with regard to any future specific consent by the County to
exercise by the District of any other special powers granted expressly in its general law charter,
the legal existence and authority of the District, as created by State law and as established by this
ordinance, shall have thereby been decided.
C. Consent to the following: (i) the exercise by the District pursuant to
Section 190.012(2)(a), Florida Statutes of the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct or
reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain additional systems and facilities for
parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses and (ii) the
exercise by the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(d), Florida Statutes of the power to
finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate
and maintain additional systems, facilities and basic infrastructure for security, including, but not
limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion -detection systems, and patrol cars,
when authorized by proper governmental agencies; provided, however that the District may not
exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general purpose
government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District's boundaries.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures appear on next page.)
5
SUBMITTED this day of February, 2022.
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC,
a Florida lirn' liability company %
By:
David E. b es, Manager
Exhibit List:
Exhibit "1": Location Map
Exhibit "2": Legal Description of Proposed District
Exhibit "3A": Landowner Written Consent — Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
Exhibit "313": Petitioner's Deed of Record
Exhibit "4": Existing Land Uses
Exhibit "5": Future Land Use Map
Exhibit "6": Proposed Development Plan (preliminary and subject to change)
Exhibit "6A": Proposed Stormwater Plan (preliminary and subject to change)
Exhibit "613": Proposed Wastewater Plan (preliminary and subject to change)
Exhibit "6C": Proposed Potable Water Plan (preliminary and subject to change)
Exhibit "61)": Proposed Irrigation Quality Water Plan (preliminary and subject to change)
Exhibit "7: Maps of Locations of Water Mains, Sewer Interceptors and Outfalls
Exhibit "8": Proposed Estimated Costs of Construction for District Improvements (preliminary
and subject to change)
Exhibit "9": Proposed Timetables of Construction (preliminary and subject to change)
Exhibit "10": Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Additional Submittals Attached:
Letter of Purpose
Affidavit Adopting Written, Pre -Filed Testimony from Jeremy H. Arnold, P.E. of Atwell, LLC
7
'v
Y 1<
4001 Tomiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
COLEMAN YOVANOVICH I KOESTER T:239,435.3535 1 F:239.435.1218
Writer's Email:
gurbancicncyklawfirm. com
February 9, 2022
VIA COURIER
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida
c/o Collier County Growth Management Department
Community Planning Section
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Re: Petition for Establishment of Hacienda North Community Development District
Letter of of Purpose
Dear Chairman and Commissioners:
Enclosed for filing is the Petition for Establishment of a Community Development District Named
Hacienda North Community Development District Pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes. I have
enclosed one paper copy along with a thumb drive with a pdf copy. Also, Check #3964 in the amount of
$15,000.00 payable to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County for the filing fee established
under Chapter 190, Florida Statutes is being hand delivered with a copy of this letter.
The purpose of the Petition it to form a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190,
Florida Statutes (the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, as amended) in the
unincorporated area of Collier County with the District to contain approximately 197.82 acres.
The real property within the proposed District is amenable to the formation of a community
development for the following reasons:
a. Establishment of the District and all land uses and services planned within the proposed
District are not inconsistent with applicable elements or portions of the effective State Comprehensive Plan
or the Collier County Comprehensive Plan.
b. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a planned unit community for which
development plans have been submitted to Collier County. The land encompassing the proposed District
is of sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be developed as one functional and
interrelated community.
C. The establishment of the District will prevent the general body of taxpayers in the County
from bearing the burden for installation of the infrastructure and the maintenance of certain facilities within
the development encompassed by the District. The District is the best alternative for delivering community
development services and facilities to the proposed community without imposing an additional burden on
cyklawfirm.com
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County
February 9, 2022
Page 2 of 2
the general population of the local general-purpose government. Establishment of the District in
conjunction with a comprehensively planned community, as proposed, allows for a more efficient use of
resources.
d. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible
with the capacity and use of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. In
addition, the establishment of the District will provide a perpetual entity capable of making reasonable
provisions for the operation and maintenance of the District's services and facilities.
The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate special district
government.
Please contact me if there are any questions regarding the enclosed Petition or if you require any
additional information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Gregory L. Urbancic
For the Firm
Enclosures
cc: David E. Torres, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC (via email only)
Russ Weyer, Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. (via email only)
Jeremy H. Arnold, P.E., Atwell, LLC (via email only)
cyUa, v,/fo rrn.co m
Exhibit "I"
EXHIBIT 1: LOCATION MAP
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
TION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLOMDACERTMIC nCeAll HOMI TIONk8639
14 50S 26E
,LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000102.dwg I JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 2 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
ORTH
'TO SCALE
IAA ' ' ENGINEERING
r.IVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 2394405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
RHODES & RgODES LAND SURVEYING, INC.
28100BONITAGFJ-NDEDRIVE #107 NAPIES, FLORMAWV
PHONE (239) 4#64166 FAX (239) 4W 810
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21 (INCLUSIVE) OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING ALL OF TRACT FD-1, HACIENDA LAKES OF
NAPLES - PHASE II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 61, PAGES 16
AND 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF
SECTIONS 13,14 AND 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21
(INCLUSIVE) OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: SOUTH
00°50'27" WEST, 344.07 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 00°49'30" WEST, 255.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 89° 10' 15" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 563.89 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 182.19 FEET ALONG THE
ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 530.00 FEET, THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19041'43" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 79019'24"
EAST, 181.29 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 23.37 FEET ALONG
THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38015'49" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 88036'27" EAST, 22.94 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 95.07
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°31'14" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT
BEARS SOUTH 82058'44" EAST, 92.14 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY, 212.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21 °24'22"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 47030'56" EAST, 211.72 FEET TO A POINT
OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY, 91.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR
CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
47042'50" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 12°57'20" EAST, 88.98 FEET TO
A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY, 29.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 48016'55" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 13014'22" EAST, 28.63
FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, 198.92 FEET ALONG THE
ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 220.00 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51 °48'25" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 63017'02" EAST, 192.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'11'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.82 FEET TO A
POINT OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF A 170.00 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 673, PAGE 1843 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 00048'45" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF AN EXISTING 170.00 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, AS
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 668, PAGE 1751 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 708.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT
FD-2; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FIFTEEN (15) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID
TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 87025'45" EAST, 2,004.48 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 00047'37"
WEST, 671.11 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 87°27'14" EAST, 668.22 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH
00047'14" WEST, 671.39 FEET; COURSE NO. 5: NORTH 87028'42" EAST, 1,336.55 FEET; COURSE (6) NORTH
87030'06" EAST, 504.61 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 7:
SOUTHERLY, 166.87 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING
A RADIUS OF 9,860.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00058'11" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY
Z:\HACIENDA LAKES\HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES NORTH CDD\2021-858 LEGAL
DESCRIPTION.docx
Page 1 of 4
RHODES & RgODES LAND SURVEYING, INC.
28100BONITAGFJ-NDEDRIVE #107 NAPIES, FLORMAWV
PHONE (239) 4#64166 FAX (239) 4W 8163
A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 16032'15" WEST, 166.87 FEET; COURSE NO. 8: SOUTH 16°03'09" WEST,
370.15 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO.9: SOUTHWESTERLY, 788.77 FEET ALONG THE
ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,580.00 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28036'11" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 30021'15" WEST, 780.60 FEET; COURSE NO. 10: SOUTH 44°39'20" WEST, 705.32 FEET; COURSE NO.
11: NORTH 45°20'40" WEST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 12:
SOUTHWESTERLY, 146.11 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,390.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°30'10"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 42054'15" WEST, 146.09 FEET; COURSE
NO. 13: SOUTH 48°50'49" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO.
14: SOUTHERLY, 1,669.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,370.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40°21'59" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 20058'11" WEST, 1,635.40 FEET; COURSE NO. 15: SOUTH
00047'07" WEST, 127.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT FD-2; THENCE
SOUTH 87037'31" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2, A DISTANCE OF
20.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT FD-1, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES - PHASE
11, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 61, PAGES 16 AND 17 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5)
COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-1; COURSE NO. 1: SOUTH 00047'12" WEST,
820.13 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: NORTH 89012'48" WEST, 120.00 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 00°47' 12"
EAST, 163.01 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH 87°37'31" WEST, 20.03 FEET; COURSE NO. 5: NORTH 00047' 14"
EAST, 650.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT FD-1, ALSO BEING THE
SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT FD-2 OF AFORESAID HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES PLAT;
THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-
2 OF LAST SAID PLAT; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00047'14" EAST, 136.36 FEET TO A POINT OF
CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 2: NORTHERLY, 1,302.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,
CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
29030'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 15032'13" EAST, 1,288.33 FEET;
COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 87033'06" EAST, 5.70 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: NORTH 00047'03" EAST, 671.53 FEET;
COURSE NO. 5: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 334.19 FEET; COURSE NO. 6: SOUTH 89°44'23" WEST, 134.31
FEET; COURSE NO.7: NORTH 04°44'35" WEST, 0.82 FEET; COURSE NO. 8: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 105.71
FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 9: WESTERLY, 181.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 940.00 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11003'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 81059'59"
WEST, 181.09 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 10: WESTERLY, 192.95 FEET
ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,000.00
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11003'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT
BEARS SOUTH 81059'59" WEST, 192.65 FEET; COURSE NO. 11: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 598.35 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS DESCRIBED AS "AMENDED AND RESTATED
NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OF HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (NOTICE
OF AMENDED BOUNDARIES)" AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5500, PAGE 3229 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF LAST SAID LANDS; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 04034'13" WEST,
60.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 2: NORTHWESTERLY, 56.98
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93016'33" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT
BEARS NORTH 45050'05" WEST, 50.89 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 89011'49" WEST, 80.00 FEET;
COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH 00048'11" WEST, 8.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 5:
SOUTHWESTERLY, 52.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE
NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°43'27"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 44009'55" WEST, 48.06 FEET; COURSE NO.
6: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 17.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS
DESCRIBED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5456, PAGE 1683 OF THE PUBLIC
Z:\HACIENDA LAKESAIACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES NORTH CDD\2021-858 LEGAL
DESCRIPTION.docx
Page 2 of 4
RHODES & RgODES LAND SURVEYING, INC.
28100BONITAGFJ-NDEDRIVE #107 NAPIES, FLORMAWX
PRONE (239) 4#64166 FAX (239) 4W 810
RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES
ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF LAST SAID LANDS; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00'48'11" EAST, 200.33 FEET;
COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 87°31'38" WEST, 289.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF AFORESAID
TRACT FD-2; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID
TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00'48'11" EAST, 1,111.00 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 87°28'42"
WEST, 1,002.41 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 00°48'45" EAST, 335.13 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH
87°27'58" WEST, 857.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0291'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 104.67 FEET TO A POINT
ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 190.42 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 105.00 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 103054'28" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 51057'14"
EAST, 165.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02031'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 234.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A
NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 110.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.00 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66046'31" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 34013'00"
EAST, 104.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°49'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89°10'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 545.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
TRACT FD-2; THENCE NORTH 00°49'30" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT
FD-2, A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 8,617,083 SQUARE FEET OR 197.821 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Z:\HACIENDA LAKES\HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES NORTH CDD\2021-858 LEGAL
DESCRIPTION.docx
Page 3 of 4
0. B.
P°0.C° II L�j
N.W CORNER OF TRACT II
FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES II .
OF NAPLES n
II
00 REMAINDER ii
J (P.B RAT FD-2AGE 0) =
Ii l
I
I
o) C20 21�I T
J L50 C19 �I
(UNPLATTED)
(BOB)
N 87'25'45" E
N. ENE
170.0' FPL
-
TRACT
-
S. 1/4
SECTION
14
N SECTION
2004.48'
BOUNDARY
FD-2
CORNER
11
R 4ER
I (UNPLATTED)
�1 Ii 0p
OR 668 PG. 1751
0 o
L57
��
SPLIT LINE
w w
N
L10
I
C27 C23 n
FOR FPL
EASEMENTS
a -a
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4
C2
SECTION 14-50-26
U, C25 a
L51
z�z
zz
zlz
r °
170.0' FPL
BOUNDARY
UNPLATTED
(UNPLATTED)
F
CAP �'
OR 673 PG. 1843
z z
TRACT FD-2
IN
T
cq
;;
BOUNDARY
TRACT FD-z
J J
w 3
87.28'42" E 1336.55'
L12
w w
VAC ANr
(UNPLATTED) J
S. LINE N.W. 1/4
_
N
0
N.E. 1 4 SECTION 14
S. LINE N.E. 1/4 N.W.
1/4 SECTION 14Cq
C)
wl3
L
15.0' U.E.
OR 3910 PG. 3745+�
a R
F
OR 4631 PG. 1163 ii i
z
PORTION OF
w w J
p
0
TRACT FD-2
Nrn
O.R. 5841 PG. 824 II I
m
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
w w
AS AFFECTED BY jl I
O.R. 5957 ('0HACIENDA
LAKES OF
K.J
O.R. 5928, PG. 1839 ii I
(UNPLATTED) ii i
(1)NAPLES
PG. 2583 J
(P.B. 55, PAGE 10)
41.3
(UNPLATTED)
COLLIER COUNTY 100' CANAL u i
BOUNDARY
R/W PER STATE OF FLORIDA ii i
���
TRACT FD-2
STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT II I
O.R.
R/W MAP ROAD S-951 SECT. li I
5456,
03110-2602 NOTE: 100' WIDE II I
ii i
PG. 1683
'D
G�
N.E. 1/4
STRIP QUIT CLAM DEED TO
COLLIER COUNTY O.R. 21 PG. it I
L3 M
S. LINE
SECTION 14
II I
+_
S. LINE N.W. 1/4 --I
14
L27
N. LINE S.E. 1/4
_ II I
-183-------
-_ SECTION
N. LINE S.W. 1/4
L31
C16 15
SECTION`�4 Dc
30 SECTION 14 L 5
a
O rn Oa
ti`S
60' INGRESS/EGRESS c °
ROADWAY REMAINDER OF
&P.U.E.
E.,
O.R.
J JJ
(.0
�JG�
&P.U.E. z n I
TRACT FD-2
O.
5500,
__16'
O.R. 3908, PG. 4012 n ii I
(THE LORDS WAY)ip�338,
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT a
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES F
PG. 3229
o ii i
(P.B. 55, PAGE 10)
0
k
L2 0R
w
BOUNDARY
4°
qk'k�
A
TRACT FD-2-�
ABBREVIATIONS
BOB
= BASIS OF BEARING
C/L =
CENTERLINE
FPL =
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
P.B.
= PLAT BOOK
O.R.
= OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
PG..
= PAGE
P.O.C.
= POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
P.O.B.
= POINT OF BEGINNING
PSM
= PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
AND MAPPER
R/W
= RIGHT OF WAY LINE
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L8
708.91'
N 00°48'45" E
L9
671.11'
S 00°47'37" W
L10
668.22'
N 87*27'14" E
L11
671.39'
S 00*47'14" W
L12
504.61'
N 87°30'06" E
L13
370.15'
S 16°03'09" W
L14
705.32'
S 44°39'20" W
L15
20.00'
N 45°20'40" W
L16
20.00'
S 48°50'49" E
L17
127.52'
S 00°47'07" W
L18
20.03'
S 87°37'31" W
L19
820.13'
S 00'47'12" W
L20
120.00'
N 89*12'48" W
L21
163.01'
N 00*47'12" E
L22
20.03'
S 87°37'31" W
L23
650.49'
N 00'47'14" E
L24
136.36'
N 00*47'14" E
L25
5.70'
N 87°33'06" E
L26
671.53'
N 00'47'03" E
L27
334.19'
S 87°31'38" W
L28
134.31'
S 89°44'23" W
L29
0.82'
N 04°44'35" W
L30
105.71'
S 87'31'38" W
L31
598.35'
S 87°31'38" W
L32
60.04'
N 04*34'13" W
L33
80.00,
N 89'11'49" W
L34
8.59'
S 00*48'11" W
L35
17.03'
S 87°31'38" W
L36
200.33'
N 00'48'11" E
L37
289.47'
S 87'31'38" W
L38
1111.00'
N 00*48'11" E
L39
1002.41'
S 87°28'42" W
L48
344.07'
S 00°50'27" W
L49
255.61'
S 00°49'30" W
L50
563.89'
S 89°1O'15" E
L51
17.82'
S 89'11'15" E
L52
335.13'
N 00°48'45" E
L53
857.11'
S 87°27'58" W
L54
104.67'
N 02*31'19" W
L55
234.55'
N 02'31'19" W
L56
37.03'
N 00°49'45" E
L57
545.06'
N 89°1O'15" W
L58
160 00'
N 00°49'30" E
Iw
M
z z
(UNPLATTED)
V
00
P.,
0 0
NOTES
N vwi
SOUTHERLY
w
w w
1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON
BOUNDARY
o
J J
ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE
TRACT FD-2
0
w3
OF TRACT FD-2, HACIENDA
(UNPLATTED)
LAKES OF NAPLES, PLAT BOOKS
55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21
NW. CORNER
INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBLIC
TRACT FD-1 N
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
S.W. CORNER J
TRACT FD-2
J
FLORIDA, AS BEING NORTH
BOUNDARY
L18
372545" EAST AND RELATE TO
TRACT FD-1
THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE
A
BOUNDARY
SYSTEM ESTABLISHED BY THE
I" �
HACIENDA LAKES OF
w
TRACT FD-1
NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY FOR
NAPLES PHASE II J
a
FLORIDA EAST ZONE, 198J
(P.B. 61, PAGE 16-17) L22
F
DATUM WITH 1990 ADJUSTMENT.
S. LINE SECTION 14.
N. LINE SECTION 23
2. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,
RESERVATIONS AND
RATTLES TRACT L-1(y
HAKE
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD.
HAMMOCK
TRACT FD-2
ROAD
J. LINE NUMBERS L1-L7,
TRAC7.'�R
ESPLANADE AT
L40-L47 AND L59-L61 HAVE
HACIENDA LAKES
AZURE AT
BEEN INTENTIONALL Y DELETED.
PHASE ONE
HACIENDA LAKES OF
(P.B. 62, PAGE 13-21)
NAPLES PHASE II
(P.B. 62, PAGE 13-21)
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
EASEMENT
(O.R. 5149 PAGE 881)
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
DELTA
LENGTH
CHORD
CHORD BEARING
CIO
9860.00
0'58'11"
166.87'
166.87'
S 16*32'15" W
C11
1580.00
28'36'11"
788.77'
780.60'
S 30'21'15" W
C12
2390.00
3*30'10"
146.11'
146.09'
S 42*54'15" W
C13
2370.00
40°21'59"
1669.72'
1635.40'
S 20*58'11" W
C14
2530.00
29'30'04"
1302.67'
1288.33'
N 15*32'13" E
C15
940.00
11*03'18"
181.37'
181.09'
S 81°59'59" W
C16
1 1000.00
11'03'18"
1 192.95'
192.65'
S 81°59'59" W
C17
35.00
93*16'33"
56.98'
50.89'
N 45°50'05" W
C18
35.00
86°43'27"
52.98'
48.06'
S 44°09'55" W
C19
530.00
19°41'43"
182.19'
181.29'
S 79'19'24" E
720
35.00
38*15'49"
23.37'
22.94'
S 88°3627" E
C21
110.00
49*31'14"
95.07'
92.14'
S 82'58'44" E
C22
570.00
21 *24'22"
212.96'
211.72'
S 47°30'56" E
C23
110.00
47°42'50"
91.60'
88.98'
S 12°57'20" E
C24
35.00
48'1655"
29.49'
28.63'
S 13'14'22" E
C25
220.00
51 °48'25"
198.92'
192.22'
S 63'17'02" E
C26
105.00
103'54'28"
190.42'
165.38'
N 51-57'14" E
C27
95.00
66°46'31"
110.72'
104.56'
N 34*13'00" E
0 200 400 800 1600
GRAPHIC SCALE
*NOT A SURVEY*
BY: JOHN SCOTT RHODES
PSM #5739
RHODFS & RHODFS
date:
JAN. 122022
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
eslgn:
LAND SURVEYING, /NC.
scale:
1" = 800'
CERTIFIED T0:
raven:
LICENSE #LB 6897
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC.
EFC/rwc
cogo #•
N/A
c ec e :
SR
28700 BONI TA
GRANDE DRIVE SUITE 107
BONITA
SPRINGS, FL 34135
#:
view:
projec
file #:
te7
(239) 405-8166 (239) 405-8163FAX2021-858
(ccad
PLOT
2021-858
2021-858
Exhibit "3A"
LANDOWNER'S CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT OF
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Owner"),
certifies that it is the owner of certain real property located in Collier County, Florida and more particularly
described on Exhibit "A" attached to this Landowner's Consent and made a part hereof (the "Property"):
Owner understands and acknowledges that this Landowner's Consent is submitted in connection
with the petition to Collier County (the "Petition") to establish the community development district to be
known as Hacienda North Community Development District (the "District") in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. As an owner of lands that are intended to be included in the
District, Owner understands and acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.005, Florida
Statutes, the Petition to establish the District is required to include the written consent to the establishment
of the District by one hundred percent (100%) of the owners of the lands to be included within the
community development district.
Owner hereby consents to the inclusion of the Property in the District and agrees to further execute
any documentation necessary or convenient to evidence this consent and joinder during the application
process for the establishment of the District. Owner acknowledges that this consent will remain in full
force and effect until the District is established, provided that if final approval of the Petition is not granted
by Collier County within two (2) years from the date hereof, the undersigned shall have the right to
withdraw this consent by delivering written notice to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida within any time thereafter, but prior to final approval of the Petition.
If the Property is sold by Owner prior to final approval of the Petition, Owner further agrees that it
will provide to the next purchaser or successor in interest of all or any portion of the Property a copy of this
consent form and obtain, if requested by the petitioner or Collier County, the same consent in substantially
this form. Owner represents and warrants that it has taken all actions and obtained all consents necessary
to duly authorize the execution of this consent and joinder by the officer executing this instrument.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures appear on next page.}
N WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Landowner's Consent this � day
of"f�'� r`� , 2022.
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC,
a Fl
STATE OF r/--
COUNTY OF L'a((%-'y
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical presence or U
online notarization, this of F-<f 2022, by David E. Torres, as Manager of
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company,
who is `X personally known to me or U has produced as evidence of
identification.
(SEAL)
TAMELAM. SCHRODER
MY COMMISSION # HH 121444
EXPIRES: Ap6125, 2025
•••f OF i1.OP: Bonded Thru Notary Pubic Underwriters
NOTARY PUBLIC
Name: 't ok me- t & t-k S C ir+ ro CA -e r
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires:
Exhibit "A"
II
P. o. c. II
N.W CORNER OF TRACT
FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES
OF NAPLES
(UNPLATTED)
00 REMAINDER %
TRACT FD-2
� P.B. ss, PAGE 10) N 87°25'45" E
B C20C21
J L50 C19 1M M 11751
cc L57 -i OR IS
L56 —SPLIT OR FP�
C27 r C`E
C22 FOR
e^ cn C25
r —� L51 170.0' FPL
OR 673 PIL 1843
L N BOUNDARY
Iy� VACANT M J TRACT FD-2
I177� (UNPLATTED) a LK M.M, 1�4
hill � N.E. 1 4 �L39 14
L39
I&w uy
OR 3NO Pa 3745
OR 4631 Pa 1163
O.R. 5841 PG. 824 1 I m
AS AFFECTED BY '
O.R. 5928' PG. 1839 O.R. 5957 W
(UNPLATTED) ' I PG. 2583 J
(UNPLATTED)
COLLIER COUNTY 100' CANAL'
R/W PER STATE OF FLORIDA
STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT ' I O.R.
R/W MAP ROAD S-951 SECT. 5456,
03510-2602 NOTE: 100WIDEI I PG. 1683
STRIP QUIT CLAM DEED TO L37
18LLIER COUNTY O.R. 21 PG.31 I a 1 I 111/4
M1 .
F 1 30'J
60'INGRESS/EGRESS ' (ROADWAY
&P.U.E. E.
R.
O.R. 3908, PG. 4012 y I I 2338,
(THE LORDS WAY) ' IPG. 3144
� I
� I
0�
a 1 4 OOIY®t
11
N. 1 4 OONl11
14
2004.411'
BOUNDARY
TRACT FD-2
�X rn
J (UNPLATTED)
L10
BOUNDARY
y TRACT FD-2
Yi
REMAINDER OF
TRACT FD-2
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES
(P.B. 55, PAGE 10)
ESTILO ACRES
(P.B. 65, PAGES 69-71)
NOTE
ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED IN TBE ABOVE TABLES AND SKETCH
HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY MODES & MODES LAND SURVEYING, INC.
EXHIBIT 2A: SKETCH
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4
SECTION 14-50-26
(UNPLATTED)
N 87-28'42" E 1336.55'
PA
a UK ILL 1i4 HAL "I �... .._
X
I
PORTION OF
�
TRACT FD-2
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
ylyl
HACIENDA LAKES OF
J7I�
NAPLES
(P.B. 55, PAGE 10)
V^
b
BOUNDARY
TRACT FD-2
Lm XL
oWM 14/4
4
C16 C15 L27
NlpUNE �j 14 �D
L31
O 01 00
�S \
M N N
O.R. J JJ
Ip
N
�JG
5500,
6
C. 3229
L25
a`
4 i
BOUNDARY
OWkQ
TRACT FD-2
Q ��
(UNPLATTED) U
SOUTHERLY �N
BOUNDARY p
TRACT FD-2 U 2
bill
w
(UNPLATTED)
NW. CORNER
TRACT FD-1 N
S.W. CORNER J
TRACT FD-2
J
BOUNDARY L18
TRACT FD-1
q
BOUNDARY
I�
TRACT FD-1
HACIENDA LAKES OF
NAPLES PHASE II J
(P.B. 61, PAGE 16-17) L22
IL L* MM21
A1?IESNAKE
L-1 JLl
HgMMOCRACT
L20
ROgp
TRACT FD-2
TRACT
ESPLANADE AT
HACIENDA LAKES
AZURE AT
PHASE ONE
HACIENDA LAKES OF
(P. BGE 13-. 62, PAC
NAPLES PHASE II
(P.B. 62, PAGE 13-21)
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
EASEMENT
(O.R. 5149 PAGE 881)
lAl
PREPARED FOR: SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLGRIDACERTIFICATEOFAUTHORIZATIONk8636 ENGINEERING
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
14 50S 26E LI,IL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
7742 ALICO ROAD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
FORT' MYERS, FLORIDA 33912 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
FILENAME 12845000103.dwg JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E. P: 239-405.7777 F. 239.405.7809
SHEET: 3 OF 11
PHONE: (239) 208-4079 FL LICENSE NO. 66421 EMAIL inlo@w.Id,opengin—Inf w.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21 (INCLUSIVE) OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING ALL OF TRACT FD-1, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES -PHASE IL ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 61,
PAGES 16 AND 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT FD-2, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21
(INCLUSIVE) OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: SOUTH
00050'27" WEST, 344.07 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 00049'30" WEST, 255.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 89010'15" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 563.89 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 182.19 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 530.00 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL, ANGLE OF 19041'43" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 79019'24" EAST, 181.29 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 23.37
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38015'49" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT
BEARS SOUTH 88036'27" EAST, 22.94 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE EASTERLY, 95.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49031'14" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 82-58-44" EAST, 92.14 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, 212.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENPRAI. ANGLE OF 21024'22" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 47030'56" EAST, 211.72 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY, 91.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR
CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47-42-50" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 12057'20" EAST, 88.98 FEET
TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY, 29.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 48016'55" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 13014'22" EAST, 28.63 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, 198.92 FEET ALONG
THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 220.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51-48-25" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 63017'02" EAST, 192.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°l1'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.82 FEET TO A POINT OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF A 170.00 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 673, PAGE 1943 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 00048'45" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF AN EXISTING 170.00 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, AS
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 669, PAGE 1751 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 708.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF SAID
TRACT FD-2; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FIFTEEN (15) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID 'TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 87025'45" EAST, 2,004.48 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH
00047'37" WEST, 671.11 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 8702714" EAST, 668.22 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH 0004714" WEST, 671.39 FEET; COURSE NO. 5: NORTH 87028'42" EAST, 1,336.55 FEET; COURSE (6)
NORTH 87030'06" EAST, 504.61 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 7: SOUTHERLY, 166.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING
A RADIUS OF 9,860.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 000581 V AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 16032'15" WEST, 166.87 FEET; COURSE NO. 8: SOUTH 16003'09"
WEST, 370.15 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 9: SOUTHWESTERLY, 789.77 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
1,590.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28-36-11" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 30021'15" WEST, 780.60 FEET; COURSE NO. 10: SOUTH 44039'20" WEST, 705.32
FEET; COURSE NO. 11: NORTH 45020'40" WEST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 12: SOUTHWESTERLY, 146. 11 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,390.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03030'10" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 42054'15" WEST, 146.09
FEET; COURSE NO. 13: SOUTH 48050'49" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 14: SOUTHERLY, 1,669.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,
CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,370.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40021'59" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 20-58-11" WEST, 1,635.40 FEET;
COURSE NO. 15: SOUTH 00047'07" WEST, 127.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT FD-2; THENCE SOUTH 87037'3 V WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT
FD-2, A DISTANCE OF 20.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT FD-1, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES - PHASE II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 61,
PAGES 16 AND 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-1; COURSE NO. 1:
SOUTH 00047'12" WEST, 820.13 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: NORTH 89012'48" WEST, 120.00 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 0004712" EAST, 163.01 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH 87037'31" WEST, 20.03 FEET;
COURSE NO. 5: NORTH 00047'14" EAST, 650.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT FD-1, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF 'TRACT FD-2 OF AFORESAID HACIENDA
LAKES OF NAPLES PLAT; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2 OF LAST SAID PLAT; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00047'14" EAST, 136.36
FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 2: NORTHERLY, 1,302.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29030'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 15032'13" EAST, 1,288.33 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 87033'06" EAST, 5.70 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: NORTH
00047'03" EAST, 671.53 FEET; COURSE NO. 5: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 334.19 FEET; COURSE NO. 6: SOUTH 89044'23" WEST, 134.31 FEET; COURSE NO. 7: NORTH 04-44-35" WEST, 0.82 FEET; COURSE NO. 8:
SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 105.71 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 9: WESTERLY, 181.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
940.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11003-18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 81059-59" WEST, 181.09 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; COURSE NO.
10: WESTERLY, 192.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,000.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENPRAI. ANGLE OF 11'03'18" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 81-59-59" WEST, 192.65 FEET; COURSE NO. 11: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 598.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS
DESCRIBED AS "AMENDED AND RESTATED NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OF HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (NOTICE OF AMENDED BOUNDARIES)" AND RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5500, PAGE 3229 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF LAST SAID
LANDS; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 04'34'13" WEST, 60.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; COURSE NO. 2: NORTHWESTERLY, 56.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENPRAI, ANGLE OF 93016'33" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 45050'05" WEST, 50.89 FEET;
COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 89'11'49" WEST, 80.00 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH 00'48'11" WEST, 8.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE NO. 5: SOUTHWESTERLY, 52.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF
A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86043'27" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH
44G09'55" WEST, 48.06 FEET; COURSE NO. 6: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 17.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS DESCRIBED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 5456, PAGE 1683 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF LAST SAID LANDS; COURSE
NO. 1: NORTH 00'48'11" EAST, 200.33 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 87031'38" WEST, 289.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF AFORESAID TRACT FD-2; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4)
COURSES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2; COURSE NO. 1: NORTH 00'48'11" EAST, 1,111.00 FEET; COURSE NO. 2: SOUTH 87028'42" WEST, 1,002.41 FEET; COURSE NO. 3: NORTH 00048'45"
EAST, 335.13 FEET; COURSE NO. 4: SOUTH 87027'58" WEST, 857.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02031'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 104.67 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY, 190.42 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 105.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENPRAI, ANGLE OF 103054'28" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 51057'14" EAST, 165.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02031'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 234.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY, 110.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENPRAI. ANGLE OF 66046'3 V AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 34013'00" EAST, 104.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00049'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89010'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 545.06
FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT FD-2; THENCE NORTH 00049'30" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID 'TRACT FD-2, A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 8,617,083 SQUARE FEET OR 197.821 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
NOTE
ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ABOVE
HAS BEEN PREPARED BY MODES & MODES LAND SURVEYING, INC.
EXHIBIT 213: LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
TOWNSHIP. RANGE] FLORIDACERTMICATEOFAll HOMI TION08631,
14 50S 26E
,LIER COUNTY, FLORII
FILENAME 12845000104.dwg I JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 4 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
IAIENG-INEERING
LIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 239405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
INSTR 4780651 OR 4870 PG 258 RECORDED 12/28/2012 10:27 AM PAGES 10
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
DOC@.70 $446,009.20 REC $86.50
CONS $63,715,600.00
Exhibit "313"
This Instrument Prepared By:
Harold J. Webre, Esquire
COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A.
4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
(239)435-3535
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is made this 1�7day of December, 2012,
between Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantor"), and
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose
address is 3921 Prospect Avenue, Naples, FL 34104.
The Grantor, in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and
other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt
of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee and
Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described property, situated, lying and
being in Collier County, Florida, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
SUBJECT TO: (a) ad valorem and non ad valorem real property taxes for 2013 and
subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental
authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; (d) covenants,
conditions, reservations, easements and restrictions of record; and (e) that certain Mortgage and
Security Agreement in favor of Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., as recorded in O.R. Book 4845,
Page 206, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said property, and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor, but none
other.
Signature on Following Page
Special Warranty Deed
Page No. 1 of 2
OR 4870 PG 259
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and delivered this Special Warranty
Deed the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in our presence:
%kT (-)e�'a,-
Witness 1 - Printed N e
�/
Witnesst"--PAignature
in»u ,C _»�11�
Witness 2 -Printed Name
STATE OF (t,10A
COUNTY OF
Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company
B
George P. uer, as Trustee of the
George P. Bauer Revocable Trust dated
July 20, 1990, its Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of December,
2012, by George P. Bauer, as Trustee of the George P. Bauer Revocable Trust dated July 20,
1990, as Manager of Wilton Land Co any, LLC, a Florida 1' ited liability company, who
is personally known to me or _✓ who has produced �� tct !�''1 K l' as
identification. '
(SEAL)
CINDY L. SMALLWOOD
:�r,���Y'ty� Comm# DD0880748 -
�.�j xpires 61512013
�u:na,• 1`10rida NotaryAm., Inc e
n.................. 0..:............. 4........
�
Special Warranty Deed
Page No. 2 of 2
OR 4870 PG 260
ibit A
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF Collier, STATE OF FL, AND IS DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
PARCELI:
THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
PARCEL 2:
THE E 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 3:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 4:
THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 5:
THE W 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 6:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 7:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 8:
THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 9:
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 10:
THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 11:
THE W 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 12:
THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
OR 4870 PG 261
PARCEL 13:
THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
PARCEL 16:
THE E 1/2 OF THE E 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 17:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 18:
THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 19:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 20:
THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 21:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 22:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 23:
THE N 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 24:
THE E 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 26:
THE W 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 27:
THE E 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 28:
ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST AND WEST 1/4 SECTION LINE, NORTH 87°33'46" EAST 2673.55 FEET TO THE CENTER OF
SAID SECTION 14 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH 1/4 SECTION LINE NORTH
00050'21" EAST 1341.85 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID
SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 87030'50" EAST 1336.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00049'36" WEST 1342.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST AND WEST 1/4 SECTION
LINE;
OR 4870 PG 262
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 89044'17" WEST 134.30 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 04042'13" EAST 210.85 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 43012'04" WEST 178.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71031'36" WEST 145.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77018'36' WEST 175.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 6302715" WEST 288.67 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 53031-25" WEST 74.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41057'31" WEST 65.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16001'06" WEST 80.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 11026'01" EAST 73.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41005'47" EAST 146.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21016'17" EAST 88.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 07051'12" EAST 154.74 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00046'36" WEST 794.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45046'05" EAST 94.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87022'18" EAST 342.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59013'22" EAST 152.43 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 69005'26" EAST 127.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82053'39" EAST 101.37 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00049'36" WEST 25.15 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 82053'39" WEST 97.89 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 69005'26" WEST 118.64 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 59013'22" WEST 156.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87022'22" WEST 339.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 45046'02" WEST 459.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 68050'21" WEST 190.24 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 129.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67013'47" AND BEING SUBTENDED
BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 35013'27" WEST 121.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01-36-34" WEST 779.16 FEET TO
THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 87139'37" WEST 74.85 FEET TO THE
POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH 1/4 SECTION LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00050'21" EAST 2683.10
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 29:
THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET AND LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET.
PARCEL 30:
THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
ALSO LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3241, PAGE 3460, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 31:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3241, PAGE 3460, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 32:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 33:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 34:
THE E 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
OR 4870 PG 263
PARCEL 35:
THE W 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 36:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 37:
THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS
THE WEST 100 FEET.
ALSO LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2192, PAGE 2057, AND LESS THAT PORTION
DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3241, PAGE 3460, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 38:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 39:
THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 40:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 41:
THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 42:
THE S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE E 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 43:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 44:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 45:
THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 46:
THE E 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 47:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND THE W 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4
OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 48:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 49:
THE N 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL SO:
THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
OR 4870 PG 264
PARCEL 51:
THE S 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 52:
THE W 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 53:
THE N 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 54:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 AND THE N 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 55:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 56:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 57:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 58:
THE W 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 59:
THE E 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 60:
THAT PART OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25 ; RUN N 00013'20"
E, 2722.27 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE N
89016'34" W 1822.92 FEET; THENCE N 00033'02" W 1130.79 FEET; THENCE S 88056'47" W 1582.03 FEET; THENCE N
03018'24" W 1451.30 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S 87106'54" W 1919.74 FEET TO A
CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S 00013'07" E 2636.89
FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25 ; THENCE S
00013'07" E 2636.89 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25;
THENCE N 89012'25" E 2693.13 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 25; THENCE N 89012'25" E 2693.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURSUANT TO DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 759,
PAGE 1696, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 61:
THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 62:
THE S 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27, EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
OR 4870 PG 265
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE E 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 75:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP
50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS 30 FEET FOR A ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE
NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF THE PROPERTY.
PARCEL 76:
THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
OR 4870 PG 266
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 77:
THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 78:
THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 26 AND PARCEL 28 CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4845,
PAGE 1294, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
(SE 1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE S.87031'38"W., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4), FOR 134.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THENCE S.04044'35"E., FOR 205.65 FEET;
THENCE S.43009'43"W., FOR 178.18 FEET;
THENCE N.71033'57"W., FOR 145.23 FEET;
THENCE N.77020'57"W., FOR 175.92 FEET;
THENCE N.63029'37"W., FOR 288.67 FEET;
THENCE S.53029'04"W., FOR 74.43 FEET:
THENCE S.41055'10"W., FOR 65.80 FEET;
THENCE S.15058'45"W., FOR 80.79 FEET,
THENCE S.11028'22"E., FOR 73.45 FEET;
THENCE S.41008'09"E., FOR 146.55 FEET;
THENCE S.21018'39"E., FOR 88.09 FEET;
THENCE S.07053'33"E., FOR 154.74 FEET;
THENCE S.00044'15"W., FOR 830.31 FEET;
THENCE S.45°43'41"W., FOR 349.69 FEET;
THENCE S.68048'00"W., FOR 190.24 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 17.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF
110.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09018'01" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
S.64008'59"W. FOR 17.84 FEET,
THENCE N.89012'00"W., FOR 58.03 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 80 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE
WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.00048'00"E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, FOR 1,757.67 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 22.71 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
15.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86043'40" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
N.44009'49" E. FOR 20.60 FEET;
THENCE N.02028'22"W., FOR 10.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 30 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL
TOAFORESAID NORTH LINE;
THENCE N.87031'38"E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, FOR 632.81 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE EASTERLY 192.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF
1,000.00FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°03'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
N.81059'59"E. FOR 192.65 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE EASTERLY 181.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 940.00
FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11003'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.81059'59"E.
FOR 181.09 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 6 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID NORTH LINE;
THENCE N.87031'38"E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, FOR 105.71 FEET;
THENCE S.04044'35"E., FOR 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.
TOGETHER WITH:
A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
*** OR 4870 PG 267 ***
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF (W 1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF
THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.87033'05"E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST HALF (W 1/2), FOR 328.53 FEET TO A POINT ON A
CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 37.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°51'27" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH
BEARS S.29051'33"W., FOR 37.86 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 32 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID
NORTH LINE;
THENCE S.87033'06"W., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, FOR 280.05 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 30 FEET
EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF (W 1/2);
THENCE S.00047'14"W., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, FOR 619.19 FEET;
THENCE N.82056'15"W., FOR 30.18 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE;
THENCE N.00047'14"E., ALONG SAID WEST LINE, FOR 646.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL
DESCRIBED HEREIN.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 18, PARCEL 26 AND PARCEL 28 CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4845, PAGE 1299, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4)
OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
THENCE N82056'15"W FOR 97.12 FEET;
THENCE S89003'05"W FOR 119.48 FEET;
THENCE S59011'01"W FOR 156.55 FEET;
THENCE S87020'01"W FOR 339.63 FEET;
THENCE S45043'41"W FOR 110.07 FEET,
THENCE N00044'15"E FOR 35.34 FEET;
THENCE N4504344"E FOR 94.58 FEET;
THENCE N87019'57"E FOR 342.93 FEET:
THENCE N59011'01" E FOR 152.43 FEET;
THENCE N69002'35"E FOR 127.82 LEFT;
THENCE S82056'15"E FOR 130.82 FEET;
THENCE N00047'00"E FOR 619.19 FEET;
THENCE N87033'06"E FOR 280.05 FEET, TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE 1264.72 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2530.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 28038'30", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S15°06'33"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1251.60 FEET, to A POINT
ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID
SECTION 14, N00047'14"E FOR 555.85 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
Exhibit " T'
RESIDENTIAL
(CLUB ESTATES
PUD)
CONSERVATION
AREA (CFPUD)
RESIDENTIAL '.;.
(NAPLES LAKES I
k.- NORTH
N.
- _ ! Y f<,
4
UNDEVELOPED SCALE: r=1000'
(A) 141 --
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL
O
Q
z
Q
U
J
m
w J FIRST ASSEMBLY
MINISTRIES PUD
U
UNDEVELOPED
(A)
-- - - --- - -- - -
CPUD
MPUD
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
(LORD'S WAY
RPUD)
J
MPUD
UNDEVELOPED BUSINESS
PARK (MPUD)
JUNIOR DEPUTY
(HACIENDA LAKES
MPUD/DRI)
(WILLOW RUN RPUD)
PRESERVES
(HACIENDA LAKES
MPUD/DRI)
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
SCHOOL
(HACIENDA LAKES
MPUD/DRI)
L-i
EXISTING LAND USE
NORTH
A, RPUD
EAST
MPUD/DRLRPUD
RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL
=
RESIDENTIAL
SOUTH
A, MPUD/DRI, MPUD, RPUD, CPUD
(HACIENDA LAKES
MPUD/DRI)
(HACIENDA LAKES
MPUD/DRI)
WEST
A, CFPUD, PUD,
RESIDENTIAL_.`
(HACIENDA LAKES
4'Y
PROPOSED CDD
MPUD
MPUD/DRI)
ACRONYM(S):
A-ATTRACTION/ORAGRICIll, RETRACT
MPUD- MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DRI-DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
RPUPLAXND - RESIDENTGIL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CPUD-COMMERCIAL PLANNEDD UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CFPUD - COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLAFINE ).T DEVELOPMENT
ROW - RIGHT OF WAY
SMWY i7�+ j7
EXHIBIT 4: EXISTING LAND USE MAP
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
TION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLOMDACERTMICATEOFADTHOMI TIONk8639
14 50S 26E
,LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000105.dwg I JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 5 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
III .
ENGINEERING
LIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 239.405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
Exhibit "5"
URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE
HACIENDA NORTH SUBDISTRICT
CDD BOUNDARY
NORTH
SCALE: V = 1000'
10
URBAN RESIDENTIAL
FRINGE SUBDISTRICT
URBAN
SUBDISTRICT URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE
RESIDENTIAL
SUBDISTRICT
FUTURE LAND USE
NORTH
URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT
EAST
URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT
SOUTH
URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT
WEST
URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT
URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT
PROPOSED CDD
—]
URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT
EXHIBIT 5: FUTURE LAND USE MAP
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
V RESIDENTIAL FRINGE
SUBDISTRICT
TION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLOMDACERTMIC nCeAll HOMI TIONk8639
14 50S 26E
,LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000106.dwg I JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 6 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
URBAN
RESIDENTIAL
FRINGE
SUBDISTRICT
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
IAA ' ' ENGINEERING
r.IVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 239.405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
Exhibit 161
II
EXISTING 170'
FPLEASEMENT
IL
I
EXISTING 170'
FPLEASEMENT _
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
- -�
� II
HACIENDA NORTH
— L _ PARCEL
I LEGEND 1
HACIENDA NORTH CDD BOLIN
® PROPOSEDLAKE
EXISTING WETLAND
EXHIBIT 6: MASTER SITE PLAN
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
I I
BUSINESS
I
PARCEL
HACIENDA LAKES PARKWAY
NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 800'
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
HACIENDA BOULEVARD
IECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLOMDACERTMIC nCeAll HOMI TIONk8639
14 50S 26E
'OLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000107.dwg JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 7 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
IAIENGINEERING
r.IVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 2394405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
Exhibit "6A"
NORTH
JUNCTION BOX
• CONTROLSTRUCTURE
EXHIBIT 6A: STORMWATER PLAN
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
TION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLOMDACERTMIC nCeAll HOMI TIONk8639
14 50S 26E
,LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000108.dwg I JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 8 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
IAA RIGA INEERING
r.IVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 2394405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
Exhibit 16BIl
LEGEND 1
mCDD BOUNDARY
PROPOSED
FORCE MAIN
EXISTING FORCE MAIN
---W PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
• PROPOSED WASTEWATER PUMP
STATION
EXHIBIT 6B: WASTEWATER PLAN
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
CONNECT TO EXISTING
GRAVITY MAIN SERVICED
BY OFFSITE PUMP STATION
LOCATED AT SAPPHIRE
COVE DEVELOPMENT
NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 800'
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
lAl
;ECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLORIDACERTUT' TEOFAUTHORIZATION#
14 50S 26E
'OLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000109.dwg JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 9 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
8631, ENGINEERING
r.IVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 239-405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
Exhibit "6C'
EXHIBIT 6C: POTABLE WATER PLAN
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
TION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: FLOMDACERTMIC nCeAll HOMI TIONk8639
14 50S 26E
,LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000110.dwg I JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 10 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
NORTH
SCALE: 1 " = 800'
IAA RIGA INEERING
r.IVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 2394405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
Exhibit "7"
LEGEND
mCDD BOUNDARY
® PROPOSEDLAKE
inn— EXISTING FORCE MAIN
—w— EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXHIBIT 7: EXISTING UTILITIES
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239) 208-4079
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
;ECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE:
14 50S 26E
'OLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILENAME 12845000111.dwg JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
SHEET: 11 OF 11 FL LICENSE NO. 66421
NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 800'
HACIENDA NORTH
CDD BOUNDARY
IAIENGINEERING
L IVI L ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
281 GO BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405.7777 F. 2394405.7899
EMAIL- Infe0waldropengineering.com
EXHIBIT 8
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES
PROFESSIONAL & PERMIT FEES
$2,685,833.25
EARTHWORK FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
$2,563,675.20
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
$2,323,075
ROADWAYS
$2,120,850.00
OFF -SITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
$3,918,600.00
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
$2,834,669.00
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS
$4,326,689.50
POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS
$1,975,893.00
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING
$1,619,980.00
PERIMETER WALLS
$818,830.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS - ENTIRE PROJECT
$25,188,094.95
►rrUirra�xy;n�a.�iriar�crar�r�rr.�ircm, wa�oz��re�
EXHIBIT 9
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
PROPOSED TIMETABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
HACIENDA NORTH PARCEL
IMPROVEMENT
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
COMPLETION
DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL, PRESERVATION & MITIGATION
FEES
07/2022
07/2026
EARTHWORK FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
07/2022
07/2026
ENVIRONMETAL RESTORATION
07/2022
07/2026
ROADWAYS
07/2022
07/2026
OFF -SITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
07/2022
07/2026
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING
07/2022
07/2026
PERIMETER WALLS
07/2022
07/2026
HACIENDA LAKES PARKWAY
IMPROVEMENT
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
COMPLETION
DATE
EARTHWORK FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
07/2022
07/2026
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
07/2022
07/2026
ROADWAYS
07/2022
07/2026
OFF -SITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
07/2022
07/2026
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING
07/2022
07/2026
PERIMETER WALLS
07/2022
07/2026
HACIENDA LAKES BOULEVARD
IMPROVEMENT
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
COMPLETION
DATE
EARTHWORK FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
07/2022
07/2026
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
07/2022
07/2026
ROADWAYS
07/2022
07/2026
OFF -SITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
07/2022
07/2026
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS
07/2022
07/2026
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING
07/2022
07/2026
PERIMETER WALLS
07/2022
07/2026
BUSINESS PARK PARCEL
IMPROVEMENT
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
COMPLETION
DATE
EARTHWORK FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
07/2024
07/2028
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
07/2024
07/2028
ROADWAYS
07/2024
07/2028
OFF -SITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
07/2024
07/2028
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
07/2024
07/2028
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS
07/2024
07/2028
POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS
07/2024
07/2028
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING
07/2024
07/2028
PERIMETER WALLS
07/2024
07/2028
Exhibit "10"
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs has been prepared as a component of
the petition filed with the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to
establish the Hacienda North Community Development District ("District") in
accordance with Chapter 190.005, Florida Statutes ("F.S."). Specifically, Section
190.005(1)(a)8, F.S., requires that, as part of the petition, a Statement of Estimated
Regulatory Costs be prepared pursuant to Section 120.541, F.S.
A community development district (a "CDD") is established under the Uniform
Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, F.S., as amended (the
"Act"). A CDD is a local unit of special-purpose government that is limited to the
performance of those specialized functions authorized by the Act. Those specialized
functions consist of planning, financing, constructing and maintaining certain public
infrastructure improvements and community development services. As an independent
special district, the CDD's governing body establishes its own budget and, within the
scope of its authorized powers, operates independently of the local general-purpose
governmental entity (i.e., the county or the city) whose boundaries include the CDD.
However, a CDD cannot regulate land use or issue development orders; those powers
reside with the local general-purpose government. The Legislature has, in Section
190.004(3), F.S., made this clear by stating:
"The establishment of an independent community development district as
provided in this act is not a development order within the meaning of chapter
380. All governmental planning, environmental, and land development
laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the land within
a community development district. Community development districts do not
have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan,
building code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the
Community Planning Act. A district shall take no action which is
inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or
regulations of the applicable local general-purpose government."
In addition, the parameters for the review and evaluation of community development
district petitions are clearly set forth in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S., as follows:
"That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general
law be fair and based only on factors material to managing and financing
the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning
permitting or planning of the development is not material or relevant."
Therefore, the scope of this Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs is limited to an
evaluation of those factors pertinent to the establishment of a CDD as defined by the
Legislature and outlined in Section 120.541(2), F.S. The purpose of Chapter 190, F.S.,
is to provide another tool to government and private landowners in their efforts to comply
with comprehensive plans which require adequate public facilities and services as pre-
conditions for future development.
A CDD is a special purpose unit of local government that is established for the purpose
of providing an alternative mechanism for financing the construction of public
infrastructure. A CDD must be structured to be financially independent as intended by
the Legislature. The cost of any additional public improvements to be constructed or
any additional services to be provided by Collier County (the "County") as a result of
this development will be incurred whether the infrastructure is financed through a CDD
or any other alternative financing method. The annual operations and administrative
costs of the District will be borne entirely by the District and will not require any subsidy
from the State of Florida or the County, nor will it place any additional economic burden
on those persons not residing within the boundaries of the District.
1.2 Overview of the Hacienda North Community Development District
The proposed District will encompass approximately 197.82+/- acres on which
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC ("Petitioner") plan to develop a mixed -use project
("Protect"), which currently contemplates approximately 400 residential units and
210,000 square feet of commercial uses. The Petitioner is seeking authority, as outlined
in Section 190.012, F.S., to establish the District in order to finance, fund, plan,
establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and
maintain systems, facilities and basic infrastructure that includes, but is not limited to:
storm drainage, roadways and sidewalks, wastewater collection, potable water,
landscaping, amenities or any other project, within or outside the boundaries of the
District, as required by a development order issued by a local government or the subject
of an agreement between the District and a governmental entity. Tables 1 and 2 under
Section 5, below, estimates the costs and details the anticipated improvements and
ownership/maintenance responsibilities the proposed District is anticipated to construct,
operate, maintain and/or convey.
If approved, the District will be authorized to finance these types of infrastructure
improvements through special assessment revenue bonds. Repayment of these bonds
will be through non -ad valorem assessments levied against all benefited properties
within the District. Ongoing operation and maintenance for District -owned facilities is
expected to be funded through maintenance assessments levied against all benefited
properties within the District.
2
1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Section 120.541(2), F.S., defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory
costs must contain:
(a) An economic analysis showing whether the rule directly or indirectly:
1. Is likely to have an adverse impact on economic growth, private sector job
creation or employment, or private sector investment in excess of $1
million in the aggregate within five (5) years after the implementation of
the rule;
2. Is likely to have an adverse impact on business competitiveness, including
the ability of persons doing business in the state to compete with persons
doing business in other states or domestic markets, productivity, or
innovation in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within five (5) years
after the implementation of the rule; or
3. Is likely to increase regulatory costs, including any transactional costs, in
excess of $1 million in the aggregate within five (5) years after the
implementation of the rule.
(b) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types
of individuals likely to be affected by the rule.
(c) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local
government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any
anticipated effect on state or local revenues.
(d) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals
and entities, including local government entities, required to comply with the
requirements of the rule. As used in this section, "transactional costs" are direct
costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and
include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required
to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with
the rule, additional operating costs incurred, the cost of monitoring and reporting,
and any other costs necessary to comply with the rule.
(e) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703,
F.S. and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined
in Section 120.52, F.S. The impact analysis for small businesses must include
the basis for the agency's decision not to implement alternatives that would
reduce adverse impacts on small businesses.
(f) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.
(g) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any
regulatory alternatives submitted under Section 120.0541(1)(a), F.S. and a
statement adopting the alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the
alternative in favor of the proposed rule.
Note: the references to "rule" in the statutory requirements for the Statement of
estimated Regulatory Costs also apply to an 'ordinance" under Section 190.005(2)(a),
F.S.
2.0 An economic analysis showing whether the ordinance directly or indirectly:
1. Is likely to have an adverse impact on economic growth, private sector job
creation or employment, or private sector investment in excess of $1
million in the aggregate within five (5) years after the implementation of the
ordinance;
2. Is likely to have an adverse impact on business competitiveness, including
the ability of persons doing business in the state to compete with persons
doing business in other states or domestic markets, productivity, or
innovation in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within five (5) years after
the implementation of the ordinance; or
3. Is likely to increase regulatory costs, including any transactional costs, in
excess of $1 million in the aggregate within five (5) years after the
implementation of the ordinance.
The ordinance establishing the District is not anticipated to have any direct or indirect
adverse impact on economic growth, private sector job creation or employment, private
sector investment, business competitiveness, ability of persons doing business in the
state to compete with persons doing business in other states or domestic markets,
productivity, or innovation.
Any increases in regulatory costs, principally the anticipated increases in transactional
costs as a result of imposition of special assessments by the District will be the direct
result of facilities and services provided by the District to the landowners within the
District. However, as property ownership in the District is voluntary and all additional
costs will be disclosed to prospective buyers prior to sale, such increases should be
considered voluntary, self-imposed and offset by benefits received from the
infrastructure and services provided by the District.
4
2.1 Impact on economic growth, private sector job creation or employment, or private
sector investment in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within five (5) years
after the implementation of the ordinance.
The purpose for establishment of the District is to provide public facilities and services
to support the development of a new, master planned residential development. The
development of the approximately 197.82+/- acres anticipated to be within the District
will promote local economic activity, create local value, lead to local private sector
investment and is likely to result in local private sector employment and/or local job
creation.
Establishment of the District will allow a systematic method to plan, fund, implement,
operate and maintain, for the benefit of the landowners within the District, various public
facilities and services. Such facilities and services, as further described in Section 5,
will allow for the development of the land within the District. The provision of District's
infrastructure and the subsequent development of land will generate private economic
activity, economic growth, investment and employment, and job creation.
The District intends to use proceeds of indebtedness to fund construction of public
infrastructure, which will be constructed by private firms, and once constructed, is likely
to use private firms to operate and maintain such infrastructure and provide services to
the landowners and residents of the District. Private developers of the land in the
District will use private funds to conduct the private land development and construction
of an anticipated approximately 400 residential dwelling units and 210,000 square feet
of commercial uses, the construction, sale, and continued use/maintenance of which
will involve private firms.
While similar economic growth, private sector job creation or employment, or private
sector investment could be achieved in absence of the District by the private sector
alone, the fact that the establishment of the District is initiated by the Petitioner means
that the Petitioner considers the establishment and continued operation of the District
as beneficial to the process of land development and the future economic activity taking
place within the District, which in turn will lead directly or indirectly to economic growth,
likely private sector job growth and/or support private sector employment, and private
sector investments.
5
2.2 Impact on business competitiveness, including the ability of persons doing
business in the state to compete with persons doing business in other states or
domestic markets, productivity, or innovation in excess of $1 million in the
aggregate within five (5) years after the implementation of the ordinance.
When assessing the question of whether the establishment of the District is likely to
directly or indirectly have an adverse impact on business competitiveness, including the
ability of persons doing business in the State to compete with persons doing business
in other states or domestic markets, productivity, or innovation, one has to compare
these factors in the presence and in the absence of the District in the development.
When the question is phrased in this manner, it can be surmised that the establishment
of the District is not likely to have a direct or indirect adverse impact on business
competitiveness, productivity, or innovation versus that same development without the
District.
Similar to a purely private solution, District contracts will be bid competitively as to
achieve the lowest cost/best value for the particular infrastructure or services desired
by the landowners, which will ensure that contractors wishing to bid for such contracts
will have to demonstrate to the District the most optimal mix of cost, productivity and
innovation. Additionally, the establishment of the District for the development is not
likely to cause the award of the contracts to favor non -local providers any more than if
there was no District. The District, in its purchasing decisions, will not vary from the
same principles of cost, productivity and innovation that guide private enterprise.
2.3 Likelihood of an increase in regulatory costs, including any transactional costs,
in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within (5) years after the implementation
of the ordinance.
The establishment of the District will not increase any regulatory costs of the State or
the County by virtue that the District will be one of many already existing similar districts
within the State and also one of a many already existing similar districts in the County.
As described in more detail in Section 4.1, the proposed District will pay a one-time filing
fee to the County to offset any expenses that the County may incur in holding a local
public hearing on the establishment petition. Similarly, the proposed District will pay
annually the required Special District Filing Fee, which fee is meant to offset any State
costs related to its oversight of all special districts in the State.
The establishment of the District will, however, directly increase regulatory costs to the
landowners within the District. Such increases in regulatory costs, principally the
anticipated increases in transactional costs as a result of likely imposition of special
assessments and use fees by the District, will be the direct result of facilities and
services provided by the District to the landowners within the District.
r.�
However, as property ownership in the District is completely voluntary, all current
property owners must consent to the establishment of the District and all initial
prospective buyers will have such additional transaction costs disclosed to them prior
to sale, as required by State law. Such costs, however, should be considered voluntary,
self-imposed, and as a tradeoff for the services and facilities provided by the District.
The District will incur overall operational costs related to services for infrastructure
maintenance, landscaping, and similar items. In the initial stages of development, the
costs will likely be minimized. These operating costs will be funded by the landowners
through direct funding agreements or special assessments levied by the District.
Similarly, the District may incur costs associated with the issuance and repayment of
special assessment revenue bonds. While these costs in the aggregate may approach
the stated threshold over a five (5)-year period, this would not be unusual for a project
of this nature and the infrastructure and services proposed to be provided by the District
will be needed to serve the project regardless of the existence of the District. Thus, the
District -related costs are not additional development costs.
Due to the relatively low cost of financing available to CDDs because of the tax-exempt
nature of their debt, certain improvements can be provided more efficiently by the
District than by alternative entities and/or funding sources. Furthermore, it is important
to remember that such costs would be funded through special assessments paid by
landowners within the District, and would not be a burden on the property owners
outside of the District.
3.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the
types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance.
The individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance or affected
by the proposed action (i.e., adoption of the ordinance) can be categorized, as follows:
1) The State of Florida and its residents, 2) the County and its residents, 3) current
property owners, and 4) future property owners.
a. The State of Florida
The State of Florida and its residents and general population will not incur any
compliance costs related to the establishment and on -going administration of the
District, and will only be affected to the extent that the State incurs those nominal
administrative costs outlined herein. The cost of any additional administrative
services provided by the State as a result of this project will be incurred whether
the infrastructure is financed through a CDD or any alternative financing method.
b. Collier County
The County and its residents not residing within the boundaries of the District will
not incur any compliance costs related to the establishment and on -going
administration of the District other than any one-time administrative costs
outlined herein, which will be offset by the $15,000 filing fee submitted to the
County again as noted in Section 4.1.
Once the District is established, these residents will not be affected by adoption
of the ordinance. The cost of any additional administrative services provided by
the County as a result of this development will be incurred whether the
infrastructure is financed through a CDD or any other alternative financing
methods.
C. Current Property Owners
The current property owners of the lands within the proposed District boundaries
will be affected to the extent that the District allocates debt for the construction
of infrastructure and undertakes operation and maintenance responsibility for
that infrastructure.
d. Future Property Owners
The future property owners are those who will own property in the proposed
District. These future property owners will be affected to the extent that the
District allocates debt for the construction of infrastructure and undertakes
operation and maintenance responsibility for that infrastructure.
The proposed District will serve land that comprises an approximately 197.82+/-
acre mixed -use master planned residential development currently anticipated to
contain a total of approximately 400 residential dwelling units and 210,000
commercial square feet, although the development plan can change. Assuming
an average density of 2.39 persons per residential dwelling unit, the estimated
residential population of the proposed District at build out would be approximately
956+/- and all of these future residents as well as the future landowners within
the District will be affected by the ordinance. The County, the proposed District
and certain state agencies will also be affected by or required to comply with the
ordinance as more fully discussed hereafter.
4.0 A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local
government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and
any anticipated effect on state or local revenues.
The County is establishing the District by ordinance in accordance with the Act and,
therefore, there is no anticipated effect on state or local revenues.
8
4.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance
Because the result of adopting the ordinance is the establishment of an independent
local special purpose government, there will be no significant enforcing responsibilities
of any other government entity, but there will be various implementing responsibilities
which are identified with their costs herein.
State Governmental Entities
The cost to state entities to review or enforce the proposed ordinance will be very
modest. The District comprises less than 2,500 acres and is located within the
boundaries of the County. Therefore, the County (and not the Florida Land and Water
Adjudicatory Commission) will review and act upon the Petition to establish the District,
in accordance with Section 190.005(2), F.S. There are minimal additional ongoing costs
to various state entities to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance.
The costs to various state entities to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance
relate strictly to the receipt and processing of various reports that the District is required
to file with the State and its various entities. Appendix A lists the reporting requirements.
The costs to those state agencies that will receive and process the District's reports are
minimal because the District is only one of many governmental units that are required
to submit the various reports. Therefore, the marginal cost of processing one additional
set of reports is inconsequential. Additionally, pursuant to Section 189.064, F.S., the
District must pay an annual fee to the State of Florida Department of Economic
Opportunity which offsets such costs.
Collier County, Florida
The proposed land for the District is located within unincorporated Collier County,
Florida and consists of less than 2,500 acres. The County and its staff may process,
analyze, conduct a public hearing, and vote upon the petition to establish the District.
These activities will absorb some resources; however, these costs incurred by the
County will be modest for a number of reasons.
First, review of the petition to establish the District does not include analysis of the
project itself. Second, the petition itself provides most, if not all, of the information
needed for a staff review. Third, the County already possesses the staff needed to
conduct the review without the need for new staff. Fourth, there is no capital required
to review the petition. Fifth, the potential costs are offset by a filing fee of $15,000,
which is included with the petition and offsets any expenses the County may incur in
the processing of this petition. Finally, the County already processes similar petitions,
though for entirely different subjects, for land uses and zoning changes that are far more
complex than the petition to establish a community development district.
9
The annual costs to the County, because of the establishment of the District, are also
very small. The District is an independent unit of local government. The only annual
costs the County faces are the minimal costs of receiving and reviewing the various
reports that the District is required to provide to the County, or any monitoring expenses
the County may incur if it establishes a monitoring program for this District.
The District will incur costs for operations and maintenance of its facilities and for its
administration. These costs will be completely paid for from annual assessments levied
against all properties within the District benefiting from its facilities and its services.
4.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues
It is anticipated that approval of this petition will not have any negative effect on state or
local revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed
to provide community facilities and services to serve the Project. It has its own sources
of revenue. No State or local subsidies are required or expected. There is however,
the potential for an increase in State sales tax revenue resulting from a stimulated
economy although it is not possible to estimate this increase with any degree of
certainty.
In addition, local ad valorem tax revenues may be increased due to long-lasting
increases in property values resulting from the District's construction of infrastructure
and on -going maintenance services. Similarly, private development within the District,
which will be facilitated by the District's activities, should have a positive impact on
property values and therefore ad valorem taxes. In addition, impact fee and
development permit revenue are expected to be generated by private development
within the District and, accordingly, should also increase local revenues.
Lastly, some express a concern that a District obligation could become a State, County
or City obligation thereby negatively affecting State or local revenues. This cannot
occur, as Chapter 190 specifically addresses this issue and expressly states in Section
190.016(15), F.S.:
'It is further the purpose and intent of the Legislature that no debt or
obligation of a district constitutes a burden on any local general-purpose
government without its consent." Section 190.002(3), F. S. "A default on the
bonds or obligations of a district shall not constitute a debt or obligation of
a local general purpose government or the state."
In summary, establishing the District will not create any significant economic costs for
the State of Florida or for the County.
10
5.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by
individuals and entities, including local government entities, required to
comply with the requirements of the ordinance.
Table 1 illustrates the estimated costs of construction of the capital facilities. Total costs
of construction for those facilities that may be provided are estimated to be
approximately $25,188,094.95. The District may levy non -ad valorem special
assessments (by a variety of names) and may issue special assessment bonds to fund
the costs of these facilities. These bonds would be repaid through non -ad valorem
special assessments levied on all developable properties in the District that may benefit
from the District's infrastructure program as outlined in Table 1.
Prospective future landowners in the proposed District may be required to pay non -ad
valorem special assessments levied by the District to provide for facilities and secure
any debt incurred through bond issuance. In addition to the levy of non -ad valorem
special assessments which may be used for debt service, the District may also levy a
non -ad valorem assessment to fund the operations and maintenance of the District and
its facilities and services.
However, purchasing a property within the District or locating in the District by new
residents is completely voluntary, so, ultimately, all landowners and residents of the
affected property choose to accept the non -ad valorem assessments as a tradeoff for
the services and facilities that the District will provide. In addition, state law requires all
assessments levied by the District to be disclosed by the initial seller to all prospective
purchasers of property within the District.
The transactional costs associated with adoption of an ordinance to establish the District
are primarily related to the financing of infrastructure improvements. The District will
determine what infrastructure it considers prudent to finance through the sale of bonds.
The District plans to provide various community facilities and services to serve the
properties within the District. An estimate of these facilities and services, along with
their estimated costs, are provided in Table 1 on the next page.
11
Table 1
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Estimated Costs of Construction
Capital Improvement
Estimated Cost
Professional & Permit Fees
$2,685,833.25
Earthwork for Storm Water Management
$2,563,675.20
Environmental Restoration
$2,323,075.00
Roadways
$2,120,850.00
Off -Site Road Improvements
$3,918,600.00
Drainage Systems
$2,834,669.00
Sanitary Sewer Systems
$4,326,689.50
Potable Water Systems
$1,975,893.00
Perimeter Landscaping
$1,619,980.00
Perimeter Walls
$818,830.00
Total Estimated Costs — Entire Project
$25,188,094.95
Source: Waldrop Engineering
It is important to note that the various costs are typical for developments of the type
contemplated here. In other words, there is nothing peculiar about the District's
financing estimates for the infrastructure. These costs are not in addition to normal
project costs. Once the decision is made to issue bonds, it is expected that special
assessments will be levied against benefited property owners within the proposed
District.
The revenue generated by payment of these special assessments will be used to repay
the bonds. The obligation to pay the special assessments will "run with the land" and
will be transferred to new property owners upon sale of any portions of the property. It
should be noted that the District may not fund all of its planned public infrastructure
improvements via the issuance of long-term bonds.
To fund the cost of maintaining infrastructure that the District maintains, operation and
maintenance assessments may be imposed on the District property owners. As with
the special assessments for infrastructure acquisition and construction, the property
owner will be responsible for payment of these special assessments on the basis of the
amount of benefited property owned.
All persons choosing to acquire property in the District will be responsible for such
special assessments in addition to the taxes or assessments imposed by the County or
other taxing authorities. In exchange for the payment of these special assessments,
there are potential benefits to be derived by the future property owners. Specifically,
these persons can expect to receive a higher level of services because they, the
property owners, will initially elect the members of the District's Board of Supervisors.
Further, the District is limited in jurisdiction and responsibility to this single project.
Therefore, the District should be extremely responsive to the needs of the property
owners within the District.
12
Table 2 below provides an outline of the various facilities and services the proposed
District may provide. The District plans to fund, own, operate and maintain the
stormwater management system, the public roadways and the landscaping. The District
will fund and construct the utilities, and the District will dedicate them to the County. The
District and/or the Developer will fund the public roads and either own or covey them to
the County.
Table 2
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Proposed Facilities and Services
Facility
Funded By
O&M By
Ownership
Public Roads
Developer/CDD
County/CDD
County/CDD
Private Roads
Neighborhood Builder
Neighborhood POA
Neighborhood POA
Storm Water Management
Developer/CDD
CDD
CDD
Utilities
CDD
County
County
Off -Site Road Improvements
CDD
County
County
Perimeter Landscaping
Developer/CDD
CDD
CDD
Source: Developer and Waldrop Engineering
A CDD provides the property owners with an alternative mechanism of providing public
services; however, special assessments and other impositions levied by the District and
collected by law represent the transactional costs incurred by landowners as a result of
the establishment of the District. Such transactional costs should be considered in
terms of costs likely to be incurred under alternative public and private mechanisms of
service provision, such as other independent special districts, County or its dependent
districts, or County management but financing with municipal service benefit units and
municipal service taxing units, or private entities, all of which can be grouped into three
major categories: public district, public other, and private.
With regard to the public services delivery, dependent and other independent special
districts can be used to manage the provision of infrastructure and services, however,
they are limited in the types of services they can provide, and likely it would be
necessary to employ more than one district to provide all services needed by the
development.
13
Other public entities, such as cities, are also capable of providing services, however,
their costs in connection with the new services and infrastructure required by the new
development and, transaction costs, would be borne by all taxpayers, unduly burdening
existing taxpayers. Additionally, other public entities providing services would also be
inconsistent with the State's policy of "growth paying for growth".
Lastly, services and improvements could be provided by private entities. However, their
interests are primarily to earn short-term profits and there is no public accountability.
The marginal benefits of tax-exempt financing utilizing CDDs would cause the CDD to
utilize its lower transactional costs to enhance the quality of infrastructure and services.
In considering transactional costs of CDDs, it shall be noted that occupants of the lands
to be included within the District will receive three major classes of benefits.
First, those residents in the District will receive a higher level of public services which in
most instances will be sustained over longer periods of time than would otherwise be
the case.
Second, a CDD is a mechanism for assuring that the public services will be completed
concurrently with development of lands within the development. This satisfies the
revised growth management legislation, and it assures that growth pays for itself without
undue burden on other consumers. Establishment of the District will ensure that these
landowners pay for the provision of facilities, services and improvements to lands within
the District.
Third, a CDD is the sole form of local governance which is specifically established to
provide District landowners with planning, construction, implementation and short and
long-term maintenance of public infrastructure at sustained levels of service.
The cost impact on the ultimate landowners in the development is not the total cost for
the District to provide infrastructure services and facilities. Instead, it is the incremental
costs above, if applicable, what the landowners would have paid to install infrastructure
via an alternative financing mechanism.
Consequently, a CDD provides property owners with the option of having higher levels
of facilities and services financed through self-imposed revenue. The District is an
alternative means to manage necessary development of infrastructure and services with
related financing powers. District management is no more expensive, and often less
expensive, than the alternatives of various public and private sources.
14
6.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703,
F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined
by Section 120.52, F.S.
Collier County has a population of 375,752 according to the Census 2020 conducted by
the United States Census Bureau and is therefore not defined as a "small" county
according to Section 120.52, F.S.
Establishing the District should not have any negative impact on small businesses. Any
business, large or small, has the option of locating itself in a CDD provided the local
governmental authority has issued the appropriate land use approvals. Those that
choose this option will be subject to the financial obligations imposed by the District and
will accrue the benefits resulting from being in the District.
Furthermore, the District must operate according to Florida's "Sunshine" laws and must
follow certain competitive bidding requirements for certain goods and services it will
purchase. As a result, small businesses should be better able to compete for District
business serving the lands to be included within the District.
A CDD does not discriminate in terms of the size of businesses that can be located
within the boundaries or transact business with the CDD. Establishment of the District
should have a positive impact on the small businesses of the local economy. As outlined
above, success of the Project should generate increased employment and stimulate
economic activity in the area through increased construction expenditures related to
infrastructure and private development, thus providing enhanced opportunity for small
businesses. The establishment of a District should not have a negative impact on small
cities or counties, because the cost to construct the infrastructure is borne entirely by
the property owners within the District.
7.0 Any additional useful information.
The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic
theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits.
Inputs were received from the Petitioner's Engineer and other professionals associated
with the Petitioner.
Certain data utilized in this report was provided by the Petitioner and represents the
best information available at this time. Other data was provided by the Project Engineer
and Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. and was based on observations, analysis and
experience with private development and other CDD's in various stages of existence.
15
Finally, it is useful to reflect upon the question of whether the proposed formation of the
District is the best alternative to provide community facilities and services to the Project.
As an alternative to the District, the County could finance the public infrastructure
improvements, either directly or through the use of a County -controlled special taxing or
assessment district.
However, the County undertaking the implementation of the improvements would
naturally have an impact on the finances of the County. Unlike the District, this
alternative would require the County to continue to administer the Project and its
facilities and services. As a result, the costs for these services and facilities would not
be sequestered to the land directly benefiting from them, as the case would be with the
District. Additionally, the financing of the Project through the issuance of debt by a
County -created district could impact the County's credit rating.
Another alternative to the District would be for the developer to provide the infrastructure
and to use a property owners association ("PDX) for operations and maintenance of
community facilities and services. A District is superior to a POA for a variety of reasons.
First, unlike a POA, a District can impose and collect its assessments in the same
manner as ad valorem property taxes. Therefore, the District is far more assured of
obtaining its needed funds than is a POA. Second, the proposed District is a unit of
local government and so must operate pursuant to Florida's Govern ment-in-the-
Sunshine laws and other regulations applicable to public entities. Finally, the District
has the ability to issue tax exempt municipal -grade bonds to finance the construction of
infrastructure improvements providing for a mechanism to lower the impact of costs
A District also is preferable to these alternatives from a government accountability
perspective. With a District as proposed, property owners within the District would have
a focused unit of government under their direct control. The District can then be more
responsive to property owner needs without disrupting other County responsibilities.
16
8.0 A description of any regulatory alternatives submitted under section
120.541(1)(a), F.S., and a statement adopting the alternative or a statement of the
reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed ordinance.
No written proposal, statement adopting an alternative or statement of the reasons for
rejecting an alternative have been submitted.
Based upon the information provided herein, this Statement of Estimated Regulatory
Costs supports the petition to establish the Hacienda North Community Development
District.
Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. certifies that this SERC meets the requirements for a
SERC as set out in Chapter 120.541, F.S.
Below is a listing of some of the SERCs developed by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc.
• Capital Region Community Development District
• Cypress Shadows Community Development District
• City Gate Community Development District
• Twin Lakes Community Development District
• One Daytona Community Development District
• Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
• Hacienda Lakes Community Development District (Boundary Change)
• Fronterra Community Development District
• Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1 (Boundary Scrivener's Error)
• Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 (Boundary Scrivener's Error)
• Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1 (Boundary Change)
• Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 (Boundary Change)
17
Appendix A
LIST OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
REPORT
FL. STATUTE CITATION
DATE
Annual Financial Audit
190.008/218.39
9 months after end of Fiscal Year
Annual Financial Report
190.008/218.32
45 days after the completion of the Annual Financial Audit but no
more than 9 months after the end of the Fiscal Year
TRIM Compliance
200.068
no later than 30 days following the adoption of the property tax
Report
levy ordinance/resolution (if levying property taxes)
within 30 days of accepting the appointment, then every year
Form 1 - Statement of
112.3145
thereafter by 7/1 (by "local officers" appointed to special district's
Financial Interest
board); during the qualifying period, then every year thereafter by
7/1 (by "local officers" elected to special district's board)
within one year of special district's creation; then annual notice of
Public Facilities Report
189.08
any changes; and updated report every 7 years, 12 months prior to
submission of local government's evaluation and appraisal report
Public Meetings
189.015
quarterly, semiannually, or annually
Schedule
Bond Report
218.38
when issued; within 120 days after delivery of bonds
Registered Agent
189.014
within 30 days after first meeting of governing board
Proposed Budget
190.008
annually by June 15
Adopted Budget
190.008
annually by October 1
Public Depositor Report
280.17
annually by November 30
Notice of Establishment
190.0485
within 30 days after the effective date of an ordinance establishing
the District
Notice of Public
190.009
file disclosure documents in the property records of the county
Financing
after financing
20-Year Stormwater
403.9302
June 30, every 5-years, next cycle is in 2027
Needs Analysis
18
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
IN RE: PETITION TO ESTABLISH THE
HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AFFIDAVIT ADOPTION WRITTEN, PRE -FILED TESTIMONY
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
I, Jeremy H. Arnold, P.E., Vice President of Atwell, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability
Company, being duly sworn, do hereby state for my affidavit as follows:
1. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in this affidavit.
2. My name is Jeremy H. Arnold, P.E. and I am Vice President of Atwell, LLC, a
Florida Limited Liability Company.
3. The prepared, written, pre -filed testimony, submitted under my name to Collier
County relating to the establishment of the Hacienda North Community Development
District, and attached hereto, is true and correct.
4. If I were asked the questions contained in the pre -filed testimony orally, my oral
answers would be the same as the written answers presented in my pre -filed
testimony.
5. My pre -filed testimony generally addresses the nature of the services and facilities to
be provided by the proposed Hacienda North Community Development District, the
truth and accuracy of the Petition to establish the proposed District, and compliance
with the factors to be considered in the establishment of a community development
district.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing and the facts alleged
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Executive this � day ofebr�t , 2022.
Jeremy H. Arnold, P.E., Vice President of Atwell, LLC, a FloriqA44qi1ted Liability Company,
By _
J
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF LEE
Sworn to, subscribed and acknowledged before me by means of W physical presence or
L_J online notarization this V "} day of �ehr►n , 2022, by Jeremy H. Arnold,
P.E., Vice President of Atwell, LLC, a Florida Limited ability Company, who Pa is personally
known to me or L] provided as identi ication.
V�
JESSICA K LINN Notar Public
-� :State of Florida-Motary Public y
*� Commission # GiG 170813 My commission expires: o4f tv j?4ff
►,F �;= My Commission Expires
April 16. 2022
2
HACIENDA NORTH CDD
TESTIMONY OF JEREMY H. ARNOLD, P.E.
February 7, 2022
1. Please state your name and business address.
Jeremy H. Arnold, P.E.
Atwell, LLC
28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305
Bonita Springs, FL 34135
2. By whom are you employed and in what capacity?
Atwell, LLC as Vice President.
3. And what is the nature of your firm's business?
Civil Engineering.
4. Please describe your experience and credentials, including your current employment.
Currently employed by Atwell, LLC as Vice President. Previously Senior Vice President
at Waldrop Engineering, LLC. And Senior Project Manager and Director of Operations
prior to that.
Land Development expert in project management, due diligence, budget estimation, civil
engineering design, surface water management design, utility system layout and design,
earthwork analysis, grading, roadway design, and site planning.
5. Please provide your professional background, with degrees earned, major areas of study,
year of degree, and institutions attended.
Graduate from University of Kentucky with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil
Engineering. Over 18 years of experience practicing civil engineering in southwest
Florida.
6. Do you hold any professional designations or certifications?
Florida Professional Engineer (FL License No. 66421).
7. Are you a member of any professional associations?
Not at this time.
Page 1 of 4
8. Prior to your current employment, by whom were you employed and in what position?
Barron Collier Companies, Land Development Project Manager.
9. Do you consider yourself an expert in civil engineering?
I have been deemed an expert.
10. Please describe your experience with civil engineering relating to community
development districts ("CDDs") and special districts?
Lead Engineer for the development and establishment of multiple CDDs; including but
not limited to Currents CDD (Collier County), Esplanade Lake Club CDD (Lee County),
and LT Ranch CDD (Sarasota County). Previously F1owWay CDD (Collier County).
11. Do you consider yourself an expert in civil engineering, capable of rendering expert
opinions on CDDs, and specifically on infrastructure for CDD services?
Yes.
12. What has been your role with respect to the Petition to Establish ("Petition") Hacienda
North Community Development District ("Hacienda North CDD")?
Project Manager in charge of CDD Engineer's Report and Budget.
13. Are you familiar with the Petition filed to establish Hacienda North CDD?
Yes.
14. Have you reviewed the contents of the Petition?
Yes.
15. Are there any changes or corrections to the Petition at this time?
None.
16. Are there any changes or corrections to any of the exhibits attached to the Petition at
this time?
None.
17. Are you generally familiar with the geographical areas, type, and scope of development
and the available services and facilities within the Hacienda North CDD?
Yes.
Page 2 of 4
18. Please provide us with a brief description of the Hacienda North CDD boundaries and
location?
197.82 +/- Acre CDD Boundary, generally located east of Collier Boulevard (CR-951),
south of the existing Willow Run RPUD in Collier County, Florida.
19. Are the contents of the Petition and exhibits attached to it true and correct to the best of
your knowledge as of the date your prepared testimony is filed?
Yes.
Let me ask you a few questions about certain opinions you may have based on your
experience with CDDs, civil engineering, real estate development, and the development of
lands within the Hacienda North CDD in particular.
20. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the proposed Hacienda
North CDD is of sufficient size, sufficient compactness, and sufficient contiguity to be
developed as a functionally interrelated community?
Yes.
21. What is your opinion?
197.82 +/- Acres and 400 +/- dwelling units is adequate size for a CDD.
22. What is the basis for your opinion?
Experience in the industry.
23. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether Hacienda North CDD
is the best alternative available to provide community development services and facilities to
the area that will be served?
Yes.
24. What is your opinion and the basis for it?
Based on experience in the industry, the establishment of a CDD is a good choice to
provide long term services to the development.
25. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the services and
facilities to be provided by Hacienda North CDD will be compatible with the uses and
existing local and regional facilities and services?
Yes.
Page 3 of 4
26. What is your opinion and the basis for it?
Hacienda North CDD is north of an existing CDD that functions and provides similar
services.
27. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the area to be included
within Hacienda North CDD is amenable to being served by a separate special district
government?
Yes.
28. What is the basis for your opinion?
At this time, I do not believe the area included within the Hacienda North CDD would
not be amenable.
29. Turning now to the state and local comprehensive plan criteria of Section
190.005(1)(e)2., do you have an opinion as to whether the establishment of the Hacienda
North CDD is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the State
Comprehensive Plan?
Yes.
30. What is your opinion?
Hacienda North CDD is consistent with the state and local comprehensive plan.
31. What is the basis of your opinion?
Industry experience.
32. Do you have an opinion, as someone with expertise in planning, as to whether the
establishment of Hacienda North CDD is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan?
Yes.
33. What is your opinion?
The establishment of the Hacienda North CDD is consistent with the Collier County
Comprehensive Plan.
34. Does this conclude your testimony?
Yes.
Page 4 of 4
AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
FOR PETITION TO ESTABLISH
HACIENDA NORTH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMNT DISTRICT
Please be advised that Gregory L. Urbancic of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. is hereby authorized
to represent Hacienda Lakes ofNaples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company in all aspects of the petition
to Collier County for the establishment of Hacienda North Community Development District.
Dated: March , 2022
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC,
a Florida limite i i ity co pany�
By:
David E. orc s, Manager
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ( x ) physical presence or ( )
online notarization, this 7 of March, 2022, by David E. Torres, as Manager of Hacienda
Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who (x) is personally
known to me or ( ) has produced as evidence of identification.
(SEAL)
TAMELAM.SCHRODER
.
j° MY CAM MISSION$ HH 121444
�••,,,,' ..,, EXPIRES;Apd125,2025
:x•`=
Bonded ThtupubHUMeroTM1ers
1JI'Aa/W�1e�Aryt��,
NOTARY PUBLIC
Name:70- aa /a M 5o h fd der -
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires:
14A I THURSDAY, MAY 12, 2022 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS
Fort Myers woman who took funds
from eye doctor must repay $283,000
Michael Braun
Fort Myers News -Press
USA TODAY NETWORK — FLORIDA
A Fort Myers woman accused of taking more than
$283,000 from an employer, some of which she used to
pay off court -mandated restitution in a previous em-
ployer fraud case, is headed to prison.
Mandy Deann Urban, 45, pleaded no contest Mon-
day to charges of scheming to defraud, and accepted 24
months in state prison. Her formal sentencing will be
June 6.
As part of her plea deal Urban will have to pay resti-
tution of $283,718 to the doctor's office where she
worked at the time.
She was arrested on a fugitive warrant by the Char-
lotte Police Department in North Carolina in early 2021
and extradited to the Lee County Jail where she was ar-
rested and booked on the charges.
An arrest warrant for Urban said the alleged fraud
came to light after irregularities in bookkeeping at a lo-
cal eye medical practice and a surgical center were no-
ticed.
While employed at the office as a bookkeeper Ur-
ban's warrant said she fraudulently wrote herself 108
business checks totaling $267,763.08, depositing them
in four personal accounts at four financial institutions.
Urban worked at the office from Aug. 1, 2013, through
Nov. 9, 2017, when she was fired. Her firing came after
Continued from previous page
said.
So how big would FIU's Cat 6 simulator have to be?
Miami New Times reported it could be comparable in
size to a small football stadium, while the Washington
Post reported the wave basin may measure 200 feet
long.
Nobody knows at this early stage, Zisis said. During
the $12.8 million design effort, Zsis said researchers
will construct a smaller -scale prototype simulator at
FIU to verify and validate their assumptions.
"The small-scale replica of this huge facility is going
to be like a similar size to the Wall of Wind, more or
less," he said.
FEMA: Expect extreme climate events
During her National Hurricane Conference speech,
Criswell said the United Nations Climate Science Pan-
el fears that unless global greenhouse gas emissions
peak by 2025 and are cut 43% by 2030, the world will
likely experience extreme climate events.
"Now, does this information cause us to sink back in
our seats? Perhaps. But I encourage all of us in this
room to embrace this information and not discount it
as alarmist," Criswell told the audience.
"We have the world's top climate scientists working
hand -in -hand, nation -to -nation, to arm us with the
best information and the best data available to help us
save lives and protect property. So we need to leverage
this data and act," she said.
"Let's use it to inspire a collective shift to a future -
based mindset across all levels of government and all
of our communities nationwide. Let's use it to antici-
pate, plan for, and mitigate risks that are 10, 20, 30
years in the future," she said.
Jim Bell is director of operations with the National
Storm Shelter Association. A former Fort Lauderdale
resident, he was president of the Gold Coast Chapter of
the Door and Hardware Institute when he served on a
FULL SERVICE -
REMODELING
Tub to Shower Conversion,,:
Tile - Wood - Granite
Cabinets - Countertops
o Painting - Drywall
o Shower Doors y
Sweet Art Gallery
Contemporary Fine Art
WI N
2100-A TRADE CENTER WAY I NAPLES FL 34109
M-F 10AM-5PM 1 239.597-2110
WWW.THESW EETARTGALLERY.COM
practice officials found she had been convicted of
grand theft for stealing more than $100,000 from a
previous employer, a marketing company. The fraud
at the practice was discovered shortly thereafter.
A forensic audit confirmed the bogus checks and
an investigation by the Lee County Sheriff's Office
found that Urban made total check deposits of
$116,975.15, $50,813.21, $41,950.03, $19,573.82,
$11,760.72, $10,451.73, and $9,167.67 at the four insti-
tutions. She also cashed checks worth $7,070.75 at
one of them.
In the 2011 fraud case, Urban was convicted of
stealing $135,830.17 via fraudulent credit transac-
tions from the marketing company where she
worked. The company was reimbursed $50,000 of
the loss and Urban was court -ordered to repay
$85,000 as part of a plea agreement.
Under that agreement Urban was also found guilty
of the fraud, sentenced to 36 months probation and
allowed to seek early termination if she made full res-
titution.
She began probation May 20, 2015, the Sheriff's
Office warrant said, and began depositing the fraudu-
lently signed checks from the medical practice from
November 2014 through November 2017. The warrant
said Urban likely used funds from the deposited
checks to make restitution in the first case.
Connect with breaking news reporter Michael
Braun: mbraun@news-press.com.
committee that helped strengthen the Florida Building
Code after Hurricane Andrew struck in 1992.
"The part that's very intriguing is the storm surge.
Because that's even more severe than the winds," Bell
said of FIU's future Cat 6 simulator.
"When we're talking the wind speeds that they're
looking at, you're going to have to do more with win-
dows and doors and such. Because once the wind gets
inside the building, the building pressurizes — and it's
popping the roof off or popping windows out," Bell
said.
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT
TO CONSIDER AN
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE HACIENDA
NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED
IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY AND CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 197.82+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE AUTHORITY
FOR ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF
INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE DISTRICT NAME;
PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR
PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS
AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") hereby
gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted
in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida
Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3rd Floor W. Harmon Turner
Building (Bldg. "F") Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East,
Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, June 14, 2022. The subject of the Public Hearing
is consideration by the Board of a petition filed by Hacienda Lakes of Naples,
LLC, for the establishment of a community development district (CDD) form of
special purpose local government to be known as Hacienda North Community
Development District by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2),
Florida Statutes. The district government would serve an area of land in Collier
County generally described as follows:
The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida in the
unincorporated Collier County. The proposed district covers approximately 197.82
+/- acres of land and is located east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and north of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The proposed district is located in Sections 13, 14
and 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
Such community development district special purpose government is a way to
provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State
of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and
development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning,
implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic community facilities, systems,
and services which may be required of any such development consistent with
principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning, and development permitting.
On February 9, 2022, Gregory L. Urbancic with Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester,
PA on on behalf of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, officially submitted and filed
its CDD petition to Collier County, along with the application -processing fee of
$15,000.00 for review by the County.
The Board's consideration of the CDD Petition will comply with Section 190.005(2)
(b) and (c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this
hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted, to the six factors
listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier
County will establish Hacienda North Community Development District by adoption
of an ordinance.
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the
economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida
and its citizens (modest or very small); Collier County and its citizens (modest or very
small); the present property owners; and the future property owners.
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in
accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including
an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along
with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office
of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida.
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property
to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County
Comprehensive Planning Department, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
May 12, 19, 26, and June 2, 2022
Hacienda North Community Development District
Gregory L. Urbancic, Authorized Agent
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
_ =�
COASTAL SMILF
Dental Care
Affordable Dentistr-
for the Uninsured
Adult Exam
X-Rays,
and Basic
Cleaning
Expires 4/30/22
D0150 D1110 D0330
New
Porcelain
Crown
$899
Expires 4/30/22
D2750
Dr. Tyler Frey
Doctor of Dental Medich
Tyler Frey DMD PA
Florida Dental License
DN24272
Call for an
N
N
N
LO
c�
fv
E
t
0
M
r
Q
appointment today
(239) 394-320 i
1770 San Marco Rd.
Suite 202, Marco Island,
FL 34145
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., CHAIRMAN
ND-GC10860516-01
Coastalsmilesdental
Packet Pg. 2294
ND-GC10845169-01
NAPLESNEWS.COM I THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2022 1 11A
Tourism
Continued from Page 1A
domestic tourism during the May 4 appearance, Visit
Florida President and CEO Dana Young credited the
DeSantis-led push to reopen businesses months after
the initial hit from the pandemic.
"The ability to be in market for almost seven
months ... where not another state was doing anything
outside their borders, helped us create an incredible
strategic advantage for the state of Florida," Young
said.
Florida has now recorded four consecutive quarters
attracting more than 30 million visitors. It also has
posted three consecutive quarters with numbers top-
ping the same periods in 2019, when the state handled
a record 131.07 million tourists.
Even with the increases during this year's first
quarter, the state attracted just 1.323 million visitors
from overseas and 578,000 from Canada.
In the first quarter of 2019, the state saw 2.276 mil-
lion overseas travelers and 1.446 million Canadians.
The number of overseas travelers fell to 1.76 million
in the first quarter of 2020, as businesses and borders
Continued from previous page
her to work for us: They didn't — they didn't care.
That was frustrating for Lowe because she saw an
advanced degree as an entry barrier to getting promot-
ed within Amazon.
"They will hire anybody in management with a de-
gree," Lowe said. "It doesn't matter if you have a culi-
nary degree, you were eligible to work at Amazon as a
manager, which was crazy to me."
Does high turnover stare off growth?
A high employee turnover rate is a fact baked into
the Amazon model of employment. An investigation
by the New York Times found that even before the on-
set of COVID-19, Amazon had a turnover rate of about
150% a year for its hourly associates. That translates to
3% of the company's warehouse workers lost per
week.
Amazon's unprecedented hemorrhaging of employ-
ees has raised questions about the company's long-
term future and its ability to staff its warehouses as the
company expands nationwide, particularly in Florida.
And that rate isn't likely to slow down.
"With Florida growing, Amazon is going to keep
growing with us unless we all decide we don't want to
ship things to our homes anymore," said Jim Farrell,
associate professor of finance and economics at Flori-
da Southern College in Lakeland.
But Farrell said Amazon's high turnover rate, nearly
double the rate of other similar businesses, isn't cause
for concern. He compared the company to other indus-
tries traditionally associated with "low -skill" employ -
PRACTICE CONCENTRATING IN:
• Wills and Revocable Trusts
• Florida Tax Residency Planning
• Probate and Trust Administration
• Prenuptial Agreements
• Estate Tax Planning
• Durable Powers of Attorney/Living Wills
i
� rr -
w
— � 1
Robert H. Eardley, Esq., LL.M. WILLS, TRUSTS
Florida Bar Board Certified Wills, Trusts & & ESTATES
Estates Attorney
Master of Laws Degree in Estate Planning
Sweet Art Gallery
Contemporary Fine Art
2100-A TRADE CENTER WAY I NAPLES FL 34109
M-F 10AM-5PM 1 239.597-2110
WWW.THESW EETARTGALLERY.COM
began shutting down. With virus -related restrictions
hindering most international travel in 2021, the first-
quarter total dropped to 492,000.
After attracting nearly 1.45 million Canadians in the
first quarter of 2019, the numbers fell to 1.25 million in
the first quarter of 2020 and 55,000 in the same period
of 2021.
COVID-19 travel restrictions imposed by Canada
also resulted in Colombia being the top nation of origin
for international travelers during the full year of 2021.
Visit Florida recorded 709,000 visitors in 2021 from
the South American country, accounting for 15.3 per-
cent of international travelers coming to Florida. Can-
ada was next at 584,000 visitors for the year, followed
by Mexico at 389,000 and Peru at 261,000.
Florida lawmakers in March passed a proposed
budget that includes $50 million to fund Visit Florida's
tourism -marketing efforts during the upcoming 2022-
2023 fiscal year. The agency received $80 million for
the current fiscal year, which included $30 million in
federal stimulus money. Lawmakers have not formally
sent the 2022-2023 spending plan to DeSantis, who
has line -item veto power.
Last Friday, DeSantis signed into law a measure (SB
434) that extends the authorization of Visit Florida
from Oct. 1, 2023, to Oct. 1, 2028.
ment, even if Amazon's base pay tends to be higher.
"Virtually every low -wage business assumes high
turnover," Farrell said. "If I'm McDonald's, I'm assum-
ing high turnover. If I'm paying near or at minimum
wage, I have to be assuming high turnover."
Farrell added that because of the way Amazon is
known to work its employees, it's smart to build high
turnover into their operations. And even if Amazon
churns through employees at a high rate, the labor pool
will continue to expand — every day, people enter the
labor market either because they've turned 18 or have
rotated out of previous positions and are seeking new
employment, Farrell said.
"Did McDonald's ever run out of 15-year-olds to run
a cash register? Not really," Farrell said. "I don't antici-
pate them burning through the entire labor force. Not
in an economy as big as Florida.'
Maya Lora can be reached at mlora@gannett.com.
Follow her on Twitter @mayaklora.
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT
TO CONSIDER AN
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE HACIENDA
NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED
IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY AND CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 197.82+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE AUTHORITY
FOR ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF
INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE DISTRICT NAME;
PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR
PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS
AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") hereby
gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted
in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida
Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3rd Floor W. Harmon Turner
Building (Bldg. "F") Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East,
Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, June 14, 2022. The subject of the Public Hearing
is consideration by the Board of a petition filed by Hacienda Lakes of Naples,
LLC, for the establishment of a community development district (CDD) form of
special purpose local government to be known as Hacienda North Community
Development District by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2),
Florida Statutes. The district government would serve an area of land in Collier
County generally described as follows:
The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida in the
unincorporated Collier County. The proposed district covers approximately 197.82
+/- acres of land and is located east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and north of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The proposed district is located in Sections 13, 14
and 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
Such community development district special purpose government is a way to
provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State
of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and
development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning,
implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic community facilities, systems,
and services which may be required of any such development consistent with
principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning, and development permitting.
On February 9, 2022, Gregory L. Urbancic with Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester,
PA on on behalf of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, officially submitted and filed
its CDD petition to Collier County, along with the application -processing fee of
$15,000.00 for review by the County.
The Board's consideration of the CDD Petition will comply with Section 190.005(2)
(b) and (c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this
hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted, to the six factors
listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier
County will establish Hacienda North Community Development District by adoption
of an ordinance.
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the
economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida
and its citizens (modest or very small); Collier County and its citizens (modest or very
small); the present property owners; and the future property owners.
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in
accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including
an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along
with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office
of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida.
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property
to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County
Comprehensive Planning Department, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
May 12, 19, 26, and June 2, 2022
Hacienda North Community Development District
Gregory L. Urbancic, Authorized Agent
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
W
COASTAL SMILF
Dental Care
Affordable Dentistr-
for the Uninsured
Adult Exam
X-Rays,
and Basic
Cleaning
Expires 6/30/22
D0150 D1110 D0330
New
Porcelain
Crown
$899
Expires 6/30/22
D2750
Dr. Tyler Frey
Doctor of Dental Medicii
Tyler Frey DMD PA
Florida Dental License
DN24272
Call for an
appointment today
(239) 394-320 i
1770 San Marco Rd.
Suite 202, Marco Island,
FL 34145
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., CHAIRMAN
ND-GC10860516-01
Coastalsmilesdental
Packet Pg. 2295
ND-GC10845169-01
14A I THURSDAY, MAY 26, 2022 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS
Search for Supreme Court leaker
falls to former Army colonel
Jessica Gresko
ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON - When Gail Curley began her job as
Marshal of the U.S. Supreme Court less than a year
ago, she would have expected to work mostly behind
the scenes: overseeing the court's police force and the
operations of the marble -columned building where
the justices work.
Her most public role was supposed to be in the
courtroom, where the Marshal bangs a gavel and an-
nounces the entrance of the court's nine justices. Her
brief script includes "Oyez! Oyez! Oyez!" - meaning
"hear ye" - and concludes, "God save the United States
and this Honorable Court."
Earlier this month, however, Curley was handed a
bombshell of an assignment, overseeing an unprece-
dented breach of Supreme Court secrecy, the leak of a
draft opinion and apparent votes in a major abortion
case. Leaks to Politico suggest that the court seems
ready to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that
women have a constitutional right to abortion. That
has sparked protests and round-the-clock security at
justices' homes, demonstrations at the court and con-
cerns about violence following the court's ultimate de-
cision.
People who know Curley, 53, described the former
Army colonel and military lawyer as possessing the
right temperament for a highly charged leak investiga-
tion: smart, private, apolitical and unlikely to be in-
timidated.
"I'm confident that if the truth can be found out
here, she'll find it out and present it in an unbiased
manner," said retired Army Brig. Gen. Patrick Huston,
her direct supervisor at the Pentagon in her last mil-
itary job before the Supreme Court. Huston said he
was incredibly impressed by Curley and that she had a
tremendous reputation as a leader, but even as her
boss of two years he didn't know if she had a spouse or
children.
Through a court spokeswoman, Curley declined an
interview request. She is the court's llth Marshal and
the second woman to hold the post. She is also in some
ways constrained in her investigation by her position,
which was created just after the Civil War, in 1867. Ex-
perts say leaking the draft opinion likely wasn't a
crime, and Curley's investigative tools are limited. She
could theoretically hire an outside law firm to assist,
and in other judicial records cases the FBI has been
called in. But it isn't clear if she or others have the pow-
er to issue subpoenas to get material from journalists
or the fewer than 100 people in the court - including
justices - with access to a draft opinion.
The investigation doesn't appear to have any real
precedent. In 1973 the outcome in the Roe case leaked
several hours ahead of its announcement. The chief
justice at the time was furious and threatened lie de-
tector tests, but the leaker quickly came forward and
explained it had been an accident.
Even if the circumstances are different, overseeing
an investigation isn't new to Curley. In her military ca-
reer she routinely oversaw a dozen or more criminal
and administrative investigations and supervised
large numbers of attorneys and paralegals, Huston
said. She was an authority on international law and
laws surrounding armed conflict, but the investiga-
tions she oversaw throughout her career could range
broadly, from criminal matters involving service mem-
bers to contract issues. Huston described her as "not
the sort of person who would ever be intimidated by
anything.'
Curley began her military career at West Point,
where just under 10% of her 1991 graduating class was
women. Lisa Freidel, a member of the same 25-mem-
ber company as Curley, remembered her as kind and
studious but also a "pretty serious person!
"She didn't like the tomfoolery of some of the boys,
some of the guys, in our company. They were young
men. They do stupid stuff. She did not like that," Frei -
del remembered, adding Curley "wanted to be sur-
rounded with intellectuals, people that were smart to
challenge her."
Curley was dubbed "Swirlin' Curl" in West Point's
yearbook, which listed her hometown as Baltimore.
She was something of an introvert, Freidel said, add-
ing that she never met Curley's parents, just an aunt
and uncle, and couldn't remember her talking about
siblings.
In school, Curley was interested in American poli-
Sweet Art Gallery
Contemporary Fine Art
WI N
2100-A TRADE CENTER WAY I NAPLES FL 34109
M-F 10AM-5PM 1 239.597-2110
WWW.THESW EETARTGALLERY.COM
tics and government, an interest that
coincided with one West Point require-
ment: being knowledgeable about cur-
rent affairs. The New York Times was
delivered every morning and cadets
were supposed to be able to talk about
Curley four articles in the paper every day, Frei -
del remembered.
"You had to make sure your shoes were shined, your
belt buckles were all shined and everything before for-
mation and try to memorize the paper," she said.
Still, Curley found time for extracurricular activ-
ities. A domestic affairs club she was a member of took
a trip her senior year to Washington that included a
meeting with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. "See you
in the White House someday!" her yearbook entry
reads.
After graduating, she joined the Army's Signal
Corps, which is responsible for setting up communica-
tion systems in the field.
"I've been very fortunate in my career," Curley said
of that time according to a 2017 news article. "As a
young Army signal officer I was able to lead a large pla-
toon in Europe during my first assignment ... that was
at a time when women were not allowed to serve as
platoon leaders in certain jobs."
She eventually went on to earn a law degree from
the University of Illinois College of Law and become an
Army lawyer. Her career took her around the United
States but also to Afghanistan for a year. Later, she
spent three years in Germany as the chief legal adviser
to the commander of U.S. Army Europe.
Lt. Gen. Charles Pede, the now -retired judge advo-
cate general of the Army who chose her for that assign-
ment, called it "a big deal." In Germany, Curley was the
senior Army attorney overseeing some 300 legal offi-
cials throughout Europe, a position Pede compared to
running the European office of a large law firm. Pede
called Curley a "powerhouse intellect" but also a prac-
tical problem solver and somebody who could quickly
establish a good rapport with just about anybody. She
also plays a good round of golf, he said.
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT
TO CONSIDER AN
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE HACIENDA
NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED
IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY AND CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 197.82+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE AUTHORITY
FOR ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF
INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE DISTRICT NAME;
PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR
PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS
AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") hereby
gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted
in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida
Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3rd Floor W. Harmon Turner
Building (Bldg. "F") Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East,
Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, June 14, 2022. The subject of the Public Hearing
is consideration by the Board of a petition filed by Hacienda Lakes of Naples,
LLC, for the establishment of a community development district (CDD) form of
special purpose local government to be known as Hacienda North Community
Development District by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2),
Florida Statutes. The district government would serve an area of land in Collier
County generally described as follows:
The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida in the
unincorporated Collier County. The proposed district covers approximately 197.82
+/- acres of land and is located east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and north of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The proposed district is located in Sections 13, 14
and 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
c NT
LOCA �
2
r.
Such community development district special purpose government is a way to
provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State
of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and
development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning,
implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic community facilities, systems,
and services which may be required of any such development consistent with
principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning, and development permitting.
On February 9, 2022, Gregory L. Urbancic with Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester,
PA on on behalf of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, officially submitted and filed
its CDD petition to Collier County, along with the application -processing fee of
$15,000.00 for review by the County.
The Board's consideration of the CDD Petition will comply with Section 190.005(2)
(b) and (c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this
hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted, to the six factors
listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier
County will establish Hacienda North Community Development District by adoption
of an ordinance.
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the
economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida
and its citizens (modest or very small); Collier County and its citizens (modest or very
small); the present property owners; and the future property owners.
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in
accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including
an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along
with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office
of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida.
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property
to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County
Comprehensive Planning Department, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
May 12, 19, 26, and June 2, 2022
Hacienda North Community Development District
Gregory L. Urbancic, Authorized Agent
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
COASTAL SMILF
Dental Care
Affordable Dentistr-
for the Uninsured
Adult Exam
X-Rays,
and Basic
Cleaning
Expires 6/30/22
D0150 D1110 D0330
New
Porcelain
Crown
$899
Expires 6/30/22
D2750
Dr. Tyler Frey
Doctor of Dental Medich
Tyler Frey DMD PA
Florida Dental License
DN24272
Call for an
appointment today
(239) 394-320 i
1770 San Marco Rd.
Suite 202, Marco Island,
FL 34145
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., CHAIRMAN
ND-GC10860516-01
Coastalsmilesdental
Packet Pg. 2296
ND-GC10845169-01
10A I THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 2022 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS
Musician
Continued from Page 1A
including a 30 percent compensation reduction when
they were placed on leave for refusing vaccination.
Quarles and Brady did not return a request for an
interview or statement on the Liberty Counsel ultima-
tum. Artis—Naples offered its own statement:
"To date, we have not received a claim, and the alle-
gations as reported are without merit. Artis—Naples
continues to prioritize the safety, health and wellness
of our patrons, musicians, staff, and the community at
large, and 99% of employees are in full compliance of
our COVID-19 protocols," Artis—Naples said in the
statement.
"A committee consisting of fellow musicians, man-
agement, and board representatives was formed early
on to develop protective protocols and has unani-
mously agreed to uphold these safety measures. The
few musicians who are unvaccinated were offered a
number of generous options, and they have refused ev-
ery one.
Those options, according to Liberty Counsel's letter,
were vaccination, a year of unpaid leave or termination
as of June 30.
Vaccination fight cites two laws
The 15-page letter gave Artis—Naples, parent or-
ganization of the Naples Philharmonic, one week to
meet the demands without the law firm proceeding
with official action.
"Once we take on a cause, we relentlessly and ag-
gressively pursue justice, and we overcome any set-
backs, no matter how long and expensive the road to
ultimate justice might be," the letter stated.
The Liberty Counsel letter also says the three mu-
sicians involved, whose names were redacted in the
letter, objected to vaccination on religious grounds. It
cites an objection that cells from aborted fetuses have
been used in the development or production of the
vaccine.
The firm is also planning action to prove Artis—Na-
ples violated Florida Statute 381.00317, a pandemic -re-
lated regulation adopted last year at the behest of Gov.
Ron DeSantis. It requires employers to honor employ-
ees' decisions to refuse vaccination on the basis of
their religious beliefs or simply by agreement to un-
dergo periodic testing.
Liberty Counsel's letter made clear that it will be
asking for attorney's fees, and pointed out what the let-
ter says are multimillion -dollar ramifications of other
suits it has won. Among its cases are a decision that
brought it $1.35 million in fees against the state of Cali-
fornia and Gov. Gavin Newsom for discriminatory CO-
VID-19 restrictions on religious worship over social
distancing requirements.
The latest case brought by Liberty Counsel was de-
cided, 9-0, by the U.S. Supreme Court. It ruled a Chris-
tian cross flag could be flown as one of the discretion-
ary flags the City of Boston accepts to fly for a day be-
side its national and state flags.
The case moved up through lower courts over five
years, but Liberty Counsel gained support at the Su-
preme Court level with the Biden administration and
the American Civil Liberties Union. Both filed briefs
supporting the plaintiffs, Hal Shurtleff and Camp Con-
stitution.
If the Florida -based Liberty Counsel files suit
against Artis—Naples, it appears it would be the first
anti -vaccination litigation it has taken against an or-
ganization that is not governmental.
Its letter to Artis—Naples said it is expecting attor-
ney fees in seven figures from Boston for its five years
of work in that case.
Firm is a child of Liberty University
Liberty Counsel calls its pro bono work as much
"causes for us as they are cases for our clients," its letter
said. The 501 tax-exempt firm, which has had ties in
the past to Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia,
has financial support that allows it to pursue cases for
an extended time.
"We are a donor -funded Christian legal ministry.
Primarily we are funded by donations from people who
believe in the work that we do and who value our mis-
sion and our goals," Mihet said.
Liberty Counsel has obtained no fewer than four
separate preliminary injunctions barring adverse ac-
tions against service members on account of their reli-
gious refusals to comply with the military's vaccina-
tion mandates.
The firm is also known for agressive pursuit of the
retention of anti-LGBTQ+ laws around the world. It
drew attention for supporting a Ugandan congression-
al bill that would have punished such activity with
death. The legislation was changed to life imprison-
ment before it passed.
Another widely publicized case, in which Liberty
Counsel has not prevailed, defended a Kentucky clerk
who refused to issue a gay marriage license because it
was against her religious beliefs.
Liberty Counsel's first step would be filing a com-
plaint to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commis-
sion (EEOC) for religious discrimination, said Horatio
"Harry" Mihet of Liberty Counsel. Along with that, the
firm would ask for a right -to -sue approval. That effec-
tively would close the EEOC complaint to allow it to be
pursued in civil court.
"We've gotten those in as little as a week," said Mi-
het, who is both Liberty Counsel's vice-president of le-
gal affairs and chief legal counsel for this case.
Mihet also suggested there may be more people
named in the suit by the time it is filed: "We are actively
seeking to represent pro bono any employee who has
been terminated or had their exemption request de-
nied, whether religious, medical or otherwise."
Although Artis—Naples has not released a figure,
the assumption has been that more than 20 employees
there have been released or resigned over the CO-
VID-19 vaccination mandate.
Mihet said his organization's warning letter points
out that Artis—Naples' own legal firm issued a state-
ment urging its clients to comply with the Florida stat-
ute after it passed.
"These employers should immediately review their
current vaccine mandate policies to ensure compli-
Andrey Boreyko and the Naples Philharmonic at the
opening 2018-19 Masterworks concert. TIM GIBBONS
ance with the new Florida legislation," said the state-
ment, part of a Quarles and Brady advisory on what
Florida employers should know about Florida Statute
381.00317.
"I don't understand why they don't understand,"
Mihet said.
Contracts, statutes at war here
That statute is one of two issues that may be in play
here. From the other side, Artis—Naples deals with
contracts of Broadway musicals and individual per-
formers that are its chief performance income, and
which often incorporate union regulations. Previous
regulations have been stringent about COVID-19 safe-
ty.
Further, those regulations are still being put to pa-
per for the coming season.
"We are currently right in the middle of updating
safety protocols for tours, so anything I would share
with you today will be out of date by the time the sea-
son starts," wrote David Levy, communications direc-
tor for Actors Equity, recently to the Naples Daily News
in a response to a question about current regulation.
The Broadway League, he pointed out, must devel-
op safety protocols with sometimes as many as three
unions involved in touring productions.
Harriet Howard Heithaus covers arts and enter-
tainment for the Naples Daily News/naplesnews.com.
Reach her at 239-213-6091.
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT
TO CONSIDER AN
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE HACIENDA
NORTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED
IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY AND CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 197.82+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE AUTHORITY
FOR ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HACIENDA NORTH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF
INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE DISTRICT NAME;
PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR
PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS
AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") hereby
gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted
in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida
Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3rd Floor W. Harmon Turner
Building (Bldg. "F") Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East,
Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, June 14, 2022. The subject of the Public Hearing
is consideration by the Board of a petition filed by Hacienda Lakes of Naples,
LLC, for the establishment of a community development district (CDD) form of
special purpose local government to be known as Hacienda North Community
Development District by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2),
Florida Statutes. The district government would serve an area of land in Collier
County generally described as follows:
The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida in the
unincorporated Collier County. The proposed district covers approximately 197.82
+/- acres of land and is located east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and north of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The proposed district is located in Sections 13, 14
and 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
c NT
LOCA �
2
r.
Such community development district special purpose government is a way to
provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State
of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and
development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning,
implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic community facilities, systems,
and services which may be required of any such development consistent with
principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning, and development permitting.
On February 9, 2022, Gregory L. Urbancic with Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester,
P.A., on behalf of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, officially submitted and filed
its CDD petition to Collier County, along with the application -processing fee of
$15,000.00 for review by the County.
The Board's consideration of the CDD Petition will comply with Section 190.005(2)
(b) and (c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this
hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted, to the six factors
listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier
County will establish Hacienda North Community Development District by adoption
of an ordinance.
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the
economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida
and its citizens (modest or very small); Collier County and its citizens (modest or very
small); the present property owners; and the future property owners.
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in
accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including
an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along
with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office
of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida.
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property
to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County
Comprehensive Planning Department, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
May 12, 19, 26, and June 2, 2022
Hacienda North Community Development District
Gregory L. Urbancic, Authorized Agent
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., CHAIRMAN
ND-GC10880516-01
COASTAL SMILF
Dental Care
Affordable Dentistr-
for the Uninsured
Adult Exam
X-Rays,
and Basic
Cleaning
$9�
Expires 6/30/22
D0150 D1110 D0330
New
Porcelain
Crown
$899
Expires 6/30/22
D2750
Dr. Tyler Frey
Doctor of Dental Medich
Tyler Frey DMD PA
Florida Dental License
DN24272
Call for an
N
N
N
�D
a
r
C
m
E
L
V
M
-W
Q
appointment today
(239) 394-320 i
1770 San Marco Rd.
Suite 202, Marco Island,
FL 34145
Coastalsmilesdental
Packet Pg. 22977
ND-GC10845169-01