Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Resolution 2022-083
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED AND MODIFIED, PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, which is presently codified in Part III of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, a redevelopment plan must be adopted by the governing body to initiate redevelopment activities within the redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000-82 declared the need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and authorized the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle and Immokalee study area; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-83 established the Board of County Commissioners as the Community Redevelopment Agency to carry out redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-181 adopted the Community Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2019-75 adopted the first amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan primarily pertaining to the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, the Board now desires to further modify portions of the Community Redevelopment Plan pertaining to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission ("Local Planning Agency") conducted a formal review at a public hearing on April 7, 2022, and submitted its recommendations to the Community Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the recommendations from the Local Planning Agency were considered by the Community Redevelopment Agency at a meeting on May 10, 2022, and reviewed for inclusion into the CRA Plan, as appropriate; and [22-cxa-00537n712570/1120 1 of 2 4/20/22 WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency on May 10, 2022, voted to recommend approval of the amended CRA Plan and transmitted it to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, IN REGULAR SESSION DULY ASSEMBLED ON THIS loth DAY OF MAY 2022, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: L The Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan (Attachment "A") meets the requirements of Section 163.360, F.S. II. Finds, determines and declares that the notice requirements of Section 163.346 and 163.361(3), Florida Statutes and the public hearing requirements of Section 163.361(2), Florida Statutes have been met. III. Finds, determines, and declares that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. IV. That the Amendment to Collier County Community Redevelopment Area Plan is hereby approved and directs the CRA to proceed with implementation of the Plan. V. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this �— day of a 2022, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Awn, ep t Clerk Approv A"aAkM%' lity: signature only.. Heidi Ashton-Cicko y Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment A: CRA Plan BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Willi (m L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman [22-CRA-00537/1712570/1]20 2 of 2 4/20/22 Attachment A AMENDMENT —April 2022 141011114 ilk-1419111 1L k VA11191 M I M IN 0 1 k vim 114 RIVI 4 Ilk Community Redevelopment Plan Amendment April 2022 61"UM W14 7 ItIn Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA oBayshore Beautification MSTU Haldeman Creek MSTU Adopted June 13, 2000 First Amendment: April 23, 2019 12 8 9 13 11 12 1 1 16 Is 14 I, In 17 24 19 20—i— 21 22 23 24 19 20 29 26 26 30 2S Is 0a 4 E 10 11 12 7 0 16 Is 1.1 13 I I J is jd is 17 21 \21 71 21 IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA ImmokaleeCornunftyRedevelopment Area 21 11 IMMOKALEE CRACollier County Community Redevelopment Agency =61) Florida's 21 st century Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1 PLAN OVERVIEW 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT 3 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 5 1.5 THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7 1.6 DURATION, MODIFICATION AND SEVERABILITY OF PLAN 9 SECTION 2 FINANCIAL PLAN 2.1 FUNDING SOURCES 10 2.2 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES 11 SECTION 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT 12 SECTION 4 IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4-1 4.2 GOALS 4-2 4.3 BACKGROUND AND BASELINE DATA 4-13 4.4 REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 4-28 4.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4-41 4.6 EXHIBITS 4-49 SECTION 5 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.02 GOALS 5-E-1 5.03 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5-E-4 5.04 CHARACTER AREAS 5-E-7 5.05 FOCUS OF REDEVELOPMENT 5-E-9 5.06 FUNDING, PROJECTS & INITIATIVES 5-E-10 5.07 2000 & 2019 PLAN COMPARISON 5-E-14 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1-1 5.1.1 VISION 5-1-1 5.1.2 PROCESS 5-1-1 5.1.3 PLAN ORGANIZATION 5-1-1 5.2 BACKGROUND 5-2-1 5.2.1 CREATION OF A CRA AREA 5-2-1 5.2.2 2000 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND PROJECTS 5-2-1 5.2.3 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE CRA 2018 PERSPECTIVE 5-2-9 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5-3-1 5.3.1 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5-3-2 5.3.2 LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN 5-3-7 5.3.3 PUBLIC SPACE, PARKS, & OPEN SPACE 5-3-26 5.3.4 DEVELOPMENT 5-3-31 5.3.5 TRANSPORTATION, CONNECTIVITY, & WALKABILITY 5-3-42 5.3.6 INFRASTRUCTURE 5-3-59 5.3.7 PROCESS 5-3-66 5.3.8 CHARACTER AREAS 5-3-67 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5-4-1 5.4.1 PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS & INITIATIVES 5-4-1 5.4.2 FINANCING PLANNING 5-4-1 5.4.3 PROJECTS & INITIATIVES PRIORITIZATION 5-4-5 5.4.4 COORDINATION & PARTNERSHIPS 5-4-17 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5-5-1 5.5.1 OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT STATUTES 5-5-1 5.5.2 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5-5-1 5.5.3 ACQUISITION, DEMOLITION/CLEARANCE, & IMPROVEMENT 5-5-1 5.5.4 ZONING & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES 5-5-1 5.5.5 LAND USE, DENSITIES & BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 5-5-1 5.5.6 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT 5-5-5 5.5.7 SAFEGUARDS, CONTROLS, RESTRICTIONS & ASSURANCES 5-5-5 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5-6-1 5.6.1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 5-6-1 5.6.2 MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNITS (MSTUs) 5-6-2 5.6.3 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS 5-6-12 SECTION 6 RELOCATION PROCEDURES 102 FIGURES FIGURES 1 COLLIER COUNTY MAP 2 APPENDIX APPENDIX A RESOLUTIONS AND TRUST FUND ORDINANCE I. RES. 2000-82 — ESTABLISHMENT OF CRA AREA AND FINDING OF NECESSITY AND BLIGHTED CONDITIONS REPORT II. RES. 2000-83 - ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY III. RES. 2000-181- ADOPTION OF 2000 CRA PLAN IV. RES. 2004-179 - EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY V. RES. 2004-384 - EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY VI. ORD. 2000-42 — ESTABLISHMENT OF CRA TRUST FUND VII. RES. 2019-75 — FIRST AMENDMENT TO UPDATE SECTION 5 BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN APPENDIX B IMMOKALEE EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP - 2000 APPENDIX C BAYS H 0 RE/GATEWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS MAPS -2000 APPENDIX D GATEWAY TRIANGLE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM -2000 APPENDIX E BAYS H 0 RE/GATEWAY ESTIMATED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT VALUE -2000 APPENDIX F 2012-2025 FUTURE LAND USE MAP - 2018 Section 1 PLAN OVERVIEW Section 1.1 Introduction The Collier County Redevelopment Plan (CRA Plan) is a guide for the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the designated redevelopment areas. This plan, with its specific components, has been formulated in close cooperation with the members of each community and is based on the objectives identified by community members in a series of public workshops. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency consists of two areas designated by the Collier County Board of County commissioners as redevelopment areas under the authority of Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, Part III, Community Redevelopment Act. The two areas depicted on Figure 1 as amended, were identified by the presence of one or more conditions of blight as defined in the statutes. These findings are contained in Section 1.2 and further specified in the Appendix A and component section for each area. The redevelopment program in Collier County provides the authority granted by the statutes, the means to achieve growth management objectives, by redirecting growth to areas where urban services currently are provided or are needed but currently inadequate, encourages revitalization of once viable neighborhoods and business districts and encourages the provision of affordable, good quality housing within centers of urban concentration. The Collier County Growth Management Plan policies provide the rationale for the establishment of redevelopment areas in the county and recognizes the redevelopment plan adopted for each component area. In addition, each community has formulated their own specific objectives. Each component section describes the history and process of community involvement in each respective community. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved an expansion to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area boundary in 2004 (Resolution 2004-179 and Resolution 2004- 384). In 2018, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved a contract with Tindale Oliver Design to gathered data, perform technological analysis and seek public and agency input in order to draft an amendment to this redevelopment plan that would lay out a framework of goals, objectives, and strategies to continue the redevelopment efforts in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area. On April 23, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution 2019-75 approving the first amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan. In 2019, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency directed staff to gather data, perform analysis and seek public input to draft an amendment to layout the framework of goals, objectives and strategies to continue the redevelopment efforts in the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area (ICRA), which resulted in the 2022 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan. In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Chapter 163, Part III, enabling local units of government to designate certain areas as Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA). The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. The Florida Legislature has made amendments to the enabling legislation over the years. This Plan recognizes those amendments. Figure 1 Updated Map r W h a W Z lu Ir wv AW W O E 6z as h� N R a �� J J W CO J O anl8 010sAS OnlB 010534 g `spy m (We Sj3C flONAAA S OnlB s3GVI0M3n I,, ii OJ V O Q _i G�7 r-A ►>1 �..� w Onl9 213111D9 ONO I9NV Ol O wk p m CtiM O 4 cn 'r" (Nll DI NOl JNIMI V N ON `3N Ilfld 1 OdNIV L 'O Q ep D m ■.�..� ) NI llWtliNitl wLL � F.* ll8 Z W U V p ,Co c� Y U E of SEX w a MOL a. E �¢- O wyui U J WOE 2 5a Section 1.2 Findinqs and Conditions of Bliqht In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Statue 163.00 enabling local units of government to set up Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA). To assist in redevelopment efforts, these local agencies were mandated to establish Redevelopment Trust Funds, which would serve as the depository for tax increment revenues. The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. In 1984, the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.335 to include five primary objectives: 1. To address the physical, social, and economic problems associated with slum and blighted areas (F.S. 163.335 (1)); 2. To encourage local units of government to improve the physical environment (i.e. buildings, streets, utilities, parks, etc.) by means of rehabilitation, conservation or clearance /redevelopment (F.S. 163.335(2)); 3. To convey to local community redevelopment agencies the powers of eminent domain, expenditure of public funds, and all other general police powers as a means by which slum and blighted areas can be improved (F.S. 163.335 (3)); 4. To enhance the tax base in the redevelopment area by encouraging private reinvestment in the area and by channeling tax increment revenues into public improvements within the area (F.S. 163.335 (4)); 5. To eliminate substandard housing conditions and to provide adequate amounts of housing in good condition to residents of low or moderate income, particularly to the elderly (F.S. 163.335(5)). To be designated as a redevelopment area, the area must meet the criteria outlined in Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute. The area in Collier county were designated as Blighted" which is defined as the following: "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. On March 14, 2000, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners made finding of conditions of blight and adopted Resolution 2000-82 and adopted Resolution 2000-83 establishing the Community Redevelopment Agency. Both of these resolutions are contained in Appendix A. Section 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Collier County Growth Management Plan provides land use designations, which describe the intent and allowable density and intensity of appropriate uses for future development. The Growth Management Plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 1989 and has been amended several times since the original adoption. This section identifies the goals, objectives and policies that apply to both redevelopment areas. The goals, objectives and policies that apply to each area specifically are included in Section 4 — Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5 — Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. This amendment recognizes that the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan will be amended following the adoption of the updated Immokalee Area Master Plan currently going through the public hearing process. Both the Bays hore/G ateway Triangle Redevelopment Area and the Immokalee Redevelopment Area are located in the Urban Designation as identified on the Collier County Future Land Use Map Appendix F. As stated in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan: Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities, and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban Designated Areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. Accordingly, the Urban Area will accommodate residential uses and a variety of non- residential uses. The Urban Designated Area, which includes Immokalee, Copeland, Plantation Island, Chokoloskee, Port of the Islands, and Goodland, in addition to the greater Naples area, represents less than 10% of Collier County's land area. The redevelopment plan allows for detailed planning that will encourage the coordination of activities as outlined in Objective 4 of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 4: Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design. Policy 4.8 recognizes the adoption of the redevelopment plans for each component area: Policy 4.8: The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area formed by US41 East, Davis Boulevard an Airport -Pulling Road. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was adopted 4 by the Board on June 13, 2000. Other specific areas that may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Pine Ridge, between US41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road; b. US 41 North in Naples Park; and c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1 Subdivision. The Immokalee Community is governed by the entire Growth Management Plan which includes the Immokalee Area Master Plan (reference FLUE Policy 4.3), a separate element of the Growth Management Plan adopted in 1991 and significantly revised in 1997 and 2007. The Master Plan contains land use designations and policies applicable to the Immokalee area. Significant amendments to the Immokalee Area Master Plan are under review. A review of the land use designation and policies that apply for each area is contained in the individual component section of this document: Section 4 — Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5 — Bays hore/G ateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. Section 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Chapter 163, Part III of the Florida Statutes authorizes the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies and the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. The legislation focuses primarily on the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies, the powers granted to them and specific criteria of the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. As part of a Community Redevelopment Agency's formation, a Community Redevelopment Plan is created which provides the framework for effective redevelopment of the Community Redevelopment Area. The Community Redevelopment Plan is a comprehensive document that provides the details for redevelopment of the area, including an extensive analysis required by Florida Statutes. In accordance with Florida Statues, the governing body, in this case the Board of County Commissioners, may make subsequent changes, amendments or updates to the Community Redevelopment Plan upon recommendations of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Modifications to the plan require a public hearing process and appropriate public notification. The Community Redevelopment Act requires redevelopment plans to be consistent with the comprehensive growth management plan. This plan is as a whole consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This plan establishes a vision for the community as a whole, the component areas and its neighborhoods. The CRA's vision will not be achieved overnight or even in the next five years. This plan is intended to provide a framework for policy decisions and public improvements over the next thirty years. For the purposes of this plan, "encourage" means to support, recommend, endorse or seek approval of any project, action, program or activity and can also mean to provide incentives and allocate funds, assets and resources, including participation by staff, employees, contractors, consultants or others if approved by the Collier County Agency (CRA) and allocated through the standard operating and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners. This plan contains provisions that contemplate actions to be taken by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), including various agencies, departments or boards of the County. While the BCC has adopted this Plan, any recommendations requiring further BCC action will be taken separately to the BCC to approve and authorize implementation of any such actions. The Private Sector The Redevelopment Plan cannot be implemented without the predominant participation of the private sector. The role of the private sector is to evaluate the effectiveness of an investment risk in the Redevelopment Area and to pursue development opportunity consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. M Section 1.5 The Community Redevelopment Agency The management structure established to undertake formal redevelopment activities within the Redevelopment Area is the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners declared itself the CRA. The CRA is a legal entity, separate and distinct from the Board of County Commissioners. The Community Redevelopment Agency will use any and all methods of implementing the plan as authorized by law. The CRA will exercise the powers conferred by statute to take action within the Redevelopment Area such as will result in economic revitalization consistent with the Plan. The Board of County Commissioners has the following powers: • The power to determine an area to be slum or blighted or a combination thereof; to designate such area as appropriate for a community redevelopment project; and to hold any public hearings required with respect thereto. • The power to grant final approval to Community Redevelopment Plans and modifications thereof. • The power to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds as set forth in Section 163.385, Florida Statutes. • The power to approve the acquisition, demolition, removal or disposal of property and the power to assume the responsibility to bear loss as provided in Section 163.370, Florida Statutes. Community Redevelopment Agency Authority This Plan will be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969. The County and the CRA may use any and all methods of achieving revitalization of the Redevelopment Area as authorized by law. The following sections generally describe the available development actions. Property Acquisition The Act authorizes the County and the Redevelopment Agency to acquire real property in the redevelopment area by purchase, condemnation, gift, exchange or other lawful means in accordance with this Plan. The County and CRA may acquire real property within the redevelopment area as may be necessary for public improvements. These acquisitions will provide sites for public facilities, eliminate unsafe conditions, removing non -conforming uses, or overcome diversity of ownership and faulty lot layout which prevent redevelopment and contribute to the perpetuation of blight in the area. Whenever possible, the designated property will be acquired through negotiation with current owners. The property will be acquired through standard Community Redevelopment Agency procedures. In those instances where negotiation does not result in a mutually satisfactory agreement, the properties may be acquired by eminent domain proceedings and just compensation awarded in accordance with Chapter 170, Florida Statutes. Areas for potential land acquisition and relocation (if necessary) are indicated in the component sections of this plan. When necessary, as plans are further specified in Phase 1 (2001-2005) particular parcels will be identified for acquisition where applicable. Such plans will be subject to approval by the CRA Board. The following provides the policies which would govern acquisition, disposition, or relocation activities. Land Acquisition Plan and Program A land acquisition program will be designed to meet the goals and objectives of the redevelopment plan, while minimizing disruption of the neighborhood fabric to be retained and reinforced and minimizing acquisition costs. A land acquisition program could consist of the following components: • Right of Way Acquisition • Commercial Project Acquisitions • Residential Acquisitions for Major Projects • Residential Acquisitions for Infill Demolition, Site Preparation and Public Improvement The County and the CRA may each demolish, clear or move buildings, structures and other improvements from real property in the redevelopment area which it has acquired and as may be necessary to carry out the purpose of this plan. In addition, the County and /or the CRA may construct or cause to be constructed streets, sidewalks, curbs, utilities, lighting, open space, plazas, landscaping, water elements, and other amenities deemed necessary to implement this plan. The County and CRA may change portions of the redevelopment area to be devoted to public uses, public improvements, and infrastructure. Disposition Policy The CRA is authorized under the Act to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the CRA is authorized to dispose of Real Property by negotiated sale or lease. All real property acquired by the CRA in the redevelopment area shall be sold or leased for development for the fair value to further the purpose of this plan and as determined pursuant to 163.380 (2), Florida Statute ( 2018). The CRA may reserve such powers and controls through disposition and development document with the purchasers or lessees of real property from the CRA as may be necessary to ensure that development begins within a reasonable period of time and that such development is carried out pursuant to the purpose of this plan. Interested developers will submit proposals in accordance with Section 163.380, Florida Statues. Selected developers will be required to execute binding disposition agreements with the CRA which will safeguard that the provisions of this plan be implemented. The property may be transferred for fair value subject to the disposition agreement and other conditions or covenants necessary to ensure that the purpose of redevelopment will be effectuated. The disposition of all publicly owned or assembled land will be subject to objective and clearly defined standards and procedures which will assure timely re -uses and improvements to property in accordance with the plan and its development controls. Guidelines may include but are not limited the following activities: • Site Re -Use Guidelines • Preferred Redeveloper Designation • Competitive Private Developer Selection • Terms of Property Conveyance • Development Controls and Design Review • Residential Relocation • Commercial Relocation The CRA's Relocation Procedures are described in Section 6 of this Plan. Section 1.6 Duration, Modification and Severability of the Plan The 2000 plan was approved with a 30-year time frame. The 2022 amendment will extend the term of the Immokalee Redevelopment Area to 2052 as allowed by Section 163.387(2)(a), Florida Statues. From time to time during the term of this plan, the CRA may amend or modify this Plan. The provisions of this Plan are severable, and it is the intention of the County and the CRA to confer the whole or any part of the powers, goals, objectives and actions herein provided for and if any of the provisions of this Plan or any action implementing any provisions of this Plan shall be held unconstitutional, invalid or void by any court of competent jurisdiction, the decisions of said court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions of this Plan. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the County and the CRA that this Plan would have been adopted and implemented had such unconstitutional, invalid or void provision or action not been included herein. Section 2 FINANCIAL PLAN A viable financing program for redevelopment requires a strong commitment from the public and private sector. The key to implementation the public actions called for in this plan is attracting private market investment and the additional ad valorem tax revenue it produces. To carry out redevelopment, the CRA will use all available sources of funding from local, state and federal government and the private sector. It should be noted that the following Financial Plan is intended as a guide for funding redevelopment activities in the Redevelopment Area. Flexibility is essential. The timing, cost and tax revenue impact of private investment is, at best, a projection based upon existing knowledge. Interest rates, construction costs, and national economic conditions will vary and cause revisions in investment decisions. Section 2.1 Funding Sources Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area will require a substantial financial investment on the part of the Community Redevelopment Agency. As provided for under the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, the principal source of funding for the Redevelopment Agency will be through the mechanism of Tax Increment Financing. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) realizes the incremental increase in property tax revenues resulting from redevelopment and uses it to pay for public improvements needed to support and encourage new development. TIF is designed to allow local government to finance, over a term of years, front-end costs involved in the redevelopment of blighted areas. By using this tool a local government can develop and adopt a redevelopment plan, repave or reroute streets, provide other public improvements and open space, provide housing, provide redevelopment assistance or incentives and acquire property within the redevelopment area for redevelopment. Eligible activities, under current law, include but are not limited to, the acquisition of land and improvements, relocation of displaced residents, demolition of deteriorated structures, site preparation, infrastructure improvements plus housing and commercial development and other activities implementing this plan. Use of Tax Increment Revenues Under Florida legislation, increment revenues can be used for the following purposes when directly related to redevelopment: Administrative and overhead expenses incidental to a redevelopment plan. Redevelopment planning and analysis. Acquisition of real property in the redevelopment area. Clearance and preparation of redevelopment sites, and relocation costs. Repayment of indebtedness and payment of expenses incidental to indebtedness. Development of affordable housing within the redevelopment area. Development of community policing innovations. Construction streets, utilities, parks, public areas, parking garages, and other improvements necessary to carrying out the redevelopment plan. 10 The greatest single source of funding for the Community Redevelopment Agency will come from tax increment revenues determined by growth in certain real property tax revenues within the Redevelopment Area. For the purpose of calculating the amount of tax increment revenues the frozen tax base is the final 1999 tax roll. Projected tax increment revenues for each component area is included in the Component sections of this Plan. Section 2.2 Other Fundina Sources To make the most effective use of Tax Increment Revenues, the CRA and the County will use other County, State and Federal funding sources as appropriate and available to carry out the provisions of this plan. The Financial Plan assume that funds for the public expenditures identified in the Redevelopment Plan will be obtained from several sources in addition to Tax Increment Financing. Advances and Loans The Community Redevelopment Agency shall have the power to borrow money and accept advances from any source, public or private, including the County for any lawful purpose in connection with the redevelopment program. Tax Increment Revenues or any other funds deposited into the Redevelopment Trust Fund, which are not otherwise obligated shall be available for repayment of such loans or advances. Tax Increment Revenue Bonds When authorized by the Board of County Commissioners, the CRA may issue redevelopment revenue bonds, notes or other obligations to finance the undertaking of any community redevelopment project activity, including the payment of principal and interest upon any loans and retirement of bonds or other obligations previously issued. The security for such bonds may be based upon the anticipated tax increment revenues and such other revenues as may be legally available. Grants The Community Redevelopment Agency may apply for local, state or federal grants that may be applicable to implementation of the redevelopment goals outlined in this Plan. Tax Increment revenues may be used to match grant dollars if necessary. 11 Section 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT Since the redevelopment area contains low- and moderate -income housing, Section 163.362(3) Florida Statutes requires that the redevelopment plan contain a neighborhood impact element which... describe in detail the impact of the redevelopment upon the residents of the redevelopment area and the surrounding area in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. The structure of the Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to minimize housing and residential neighborhood impacts while emphasizing neighborhood enhancement, particularly in those areas containing affordable housing stock. The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the plan concentrate on existing commercial and semi -industrial areas. Each component section contains a Neighborhood Impact Element. 12 IMMOKALEE',")V Collier County CommunityCRA_ Redevelopment Agency Florida's 21 st century SECTION 4 Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan Second Amendment April 2022 0 4 k tM*L1LM in MM m� 4 *40 Section 4 Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area 4.1 Introduction The 2022 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan provides an updated vision and approach to redevelopment of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area (ICRA), depicted in Figure 4-1 below. Figure 4-1 - Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area Boundary Map / 1a tt 12 3q ez e 9 18 11 12 2 8 9 10 {r 11 1/ 15 14 13 18 �1T 16 15 I 14 t3 18 11 - -t6 15 - - 14 ' t 21 22 23 24 ` 19 � 21 22 23 U 19 9 21 22 18 � I 31 n 33 18 11 12 i 12-FIVt iV ,i 6 / 13 19 1A 13 18 17 �8 15 14 13 1U itl 12 16 16 IA 2 L.. 22 24 18 2p 2t 23 24 20 11 Y 22 23 19 ZQ !\•, 23 iuNONAtL[ Re 1 +F IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA 22 zs _. _ 111VVti'- -Immolmlea Comuniry RatlavelopmelR Area a, 05 1 The Plan is based on data and analysis and community input, serving as a framework to guide future redevelopment activities to eliminate blighted conditions that were identified in 2000 and continue today. It includes a list of potential capital projects and programs that could be funded by tax increment revenues generated within the ICRA. Leveraging the tax increment revenues with other funding sources will be a priority in order for major capital projects to be completed. The Plan should be reviewed every five years to adjust to market and community needs. As part of the ongoing plan review, this 2022 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan has been prepared for the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to adopt as an amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan with a timeframe extension applicable to the ICRA through 2052. While the ICRA is separate and unique from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (BGTCRA), the two areas are consistent with approaches to identifying project prioritization and general requirements required by Florida Statutes. Several subsections within each area plan are similar by design. This Plan outlines five goals for future redevelopment efforts based on community input: Celebrating Culture, Economic Development, Housing, Infrastructure, and Implementation/Administration. Within this 2022 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan, the acronym ICRA is used to refer to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, and the acronym CRA is used to refer to the Community Redevelopment Agency or staff of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Use of the acronym BCC in this document refers to the Board of County Commissioners. 4-1 4.2 Goals This Redevelopment Plan recognizes that goals are interconnected, and together they will move the community forward to achieve this over -arching vision for the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area: Vision for Immokalee - A rural community that provides safe and affordable multigenerational living opportunities, interconnected pedestrian and transportation connections, a pristine environment, and a thriving economy that celebrates a diverse culture. Goal 4.2.1 Celebrating Culture: Create a Cultural Destination Preserve and enhance the rich mix of cultures and heritage in Immokalee and embrace new ones as they are identified. Objective 4.2.1.1 Educate residents and visitors on the cultures in Immokalee. Strategy 1 Partner with the Collier County Museum and Parks and Recreation and other organizations to develop and expand signature events such as the Cattle Drive. Strategy 2 Use architectural features and colors to distinguish cultural identities Strategy 3 Use public art to educate the community on the cultures and history of Immokalee. Strategy 4 Support the expansion of culinary experiences in the community, celebrating the rich diversity of food and the fresh produce that are available in Immokalee. Strategy 5 Investigate the development of a "Cultural Trail" connecting key landmarks and points of interest that reflect historic and culturally significant places throughout the community. The Trail can educate both residents and visitors while promoting ecotourism. Objective 4.2.1.2 Create the Immokalee brand. Strategy 1 Develop a new logo and tag line that celebrates the cultures of Immokalee including its legendary athletes, farming, cattle ranching, and multi -ethnic population. Include input from the Seminole Tribe of Immokalee. Strategy Develop an Immokalee Ambassador program that involves educating local residents on the Immokalee brand so they become spokespersons for Immokalee. 4-2 Strategy 3 Develop a marketing campaign to educate the residents of Collier County, Lee County, and the region on the Immokalee brand. Strategy 4 Enhance gateways and corridors to showcase the Immokalee brand. Strategy 5 Encourage investment in the public realm to reinforce the Immokalee brand through incentives and regulatory changes. Collaborate with both public and private developers to enhance the character of the community. Strategy 6 Engage the business owners and organizations to coordinate branding efforts. Strategy 7 Coordinate with the Seminole Tribe of Immokalee to showcase the Immokalee brand. Objective 4.2.1.3 Immokalee Cultural Center Strategy 1 Coordinate with other Collier County Divisions, such as the Museum, Library, Parks and Recreation, and Tourism, to incorporate the Immokalee brand into their facilities during renovations and new construction. Strategy 2 Define the concept of a "Cultural Center" and evaluate existing community facilities to determine feasibility of incorporating the Cultural Center into an existing or renovated center or the development of a new Cultural Center. Goal 4.2.2 Economic Development Strengthen the economic health of Immokalee. Objective 4.2.2.1 Collaborations and Partnerships Strategy 1 Support the local Chamber of Commerce to become a one -stop shop for business development, promotions, and event hosting. Strategy Support and participate in the State of Florida Rural Area of Opportunity designation for the Immokalee Community. Strategy 3 Support local career fairs to assist with local company hiring and employee training. Strategy 4 Support the enhancement of the Federal Opportunity Zone program in rural areas to expand incentives. Strategy 5 Collaborate with the Collier County Airport Authority to market economic development opportunities at the Immokalee Regional Airport. 4-3 Objective 4.2.2.2 Immokalee Regional Airport Strategy 1 Support development at the Immokalee Regional Airport as an economic development catalyst for the community. Strategy 2 Develop a "shovel ready" site at the Airport with an approved set of building plans to encourage new business development at the Airport. Strategy 3 Highlight the establishment of the Immokalee Readiness Center— U.S. National Guard and Collier County Mosquito Control facilities at the Airport. Strategy 4 Support efforts by the Immokalee Regional Airport to expand industrial development opportunities including the development of an industrial park. Strategy 5 Coordinate with the State of Florida Economic Development Agencies to market the Immokalee Regional Airport. Strategy 6 Support efforts by the Immokalee Regional Airport to seek grant funds to improve infrastructure and building square footage at the Airport. Strategy 7 Collaborate with Collier County to promote the County's Certified Site Program (CSP) to attract and retain industrial development at the Airport. Objective 4.2.2.3 Establish Immokalee as a regional opportunity for manufacturing and distribution. Strategy 1 Support the expansion of existing and new transportation corridors serving the region including the State Road 29 Bypass or loop road. Strategy 2 Establish quarterly meeting updates with Hendry and Glades County to exchange information on opportunities and challenges for the region. Strategy 3 Develop partnerships with new towns developing in Eastern Collier County to encourage a regional approach to economic development that will include the Immokalee Community as an option to consider for business development. Strategy 4 Collaborate with Collier County to promote the County's Certified Site Program (CSP) within the community to attract new commercial and industrial development. Provide incentives to encourage private sector participation in the program. Strategy 5 Develop incentives to encourage business development and expansion. Strategy 6 Coordinate with Collier County to provide and maintain an accurate database of available properties and assist with marketing those properties to end users. 4-4 Objective 4.2.2.4 Expand commercial opportunities in Immokalee to reduce gaps of retail industry groups. Strategy 1 Support the development of a Business Retention and Expansion Program for existing retail establishments. The program should include site visits, education on existing programs, and incentives. Strategy Use retail demand assessments to prepare and maintain a target list of retail industry groups. Strategy 3 Develop incentive programs, including but not limited to Tax Increment Incentives, to attract the targeted groups. Strategy 4 Develop incentive programs to attract the development of new retail space that can provide lease opportunities to small businesses to provide a mix of products and services in Immokalee. Strategy 5 Partner with the Collier County Economic Development Office, Chamber of Commerce and other economic development organizations to market available properties and incentives to target industries. Strategy 6 Develop incentives to eliminate any "food deserts" identified in the community in coordination with community partners such as the Interagency Council. Strategy 7 Develop the Main Street Initiative to improve appearance, mix of uses, infill development to reflect the "center" of commercial activity for Immokalee. Strategy 8 Continue to fund the Commercial Fagade Improvement Program which provides design services and financial assistance to encourage building renovations that will enhance the community. Review the program periodically and revise as needed. Objective 4.2.2.5 Support the expansion of medical services, both not -for -profit and private sector services, to provide quality health care including but not limited to 24-hour urgent care, 24-hour pharmacies, testing laboratories, mental health services, assisted -living, and memory and palliative care. Strategy 1 Participate in the Immokalee Inter -Agency and Immokalee Unmet Needs Coalition to identify needs and develop potential incentives to assist with recruitment of services. Strategy 2 Partner with other agencies to recruit and/or expand services in Immokalee. 4-5 Objective 4.2.2.6 Support local business startups and expansions. Strategy 1 Support the development of an Entrepreneurial Support Organization to collaborate on training and services for small business development and expansion. Members may include Goodwill, SCORE, Small Business Development Association and microloan providers. Strategy 2 Provide incentives for small business start-up and expansion. Objective 4.2.2.7 Expand educational and training opportunities. Strategy 1 Coordinate with Collier County School Board to maintain and expand training programs within the Immokalee Community. Strategy 2 Support alternative transportation options to facilitate attendance at training classes outside the community. Objective 4.2.2.8 Expand tourism as a component of the Immokalee economic base. Strategy 1 Support the further development and maintenance of destination hubs in Immokalee including: Roberts Ranch, Peppers Preserve, and Lake Trafford. Support services that help the expansion of these destination hubs. Strategy 2 Develop a marketing program to highlight the destinations. Strategy 3 Coordinate with other Collier County Divisions to promote the Immokalee Community as a tourist destination. Strategy 4 Identify sites as potential corporate retreats and coordinate the steps necessary to bring those sites forward for future consideration for the conference and corporate travel sector. Objective 4.2.2.9 Develop Immokalee as a food destination. Strategy 1 Develop and maintain a database of food venues and food manufacturers. Strategy 2 Develop culinary events that highlight the diverse food options. Strategy 3 Coordinate with and support the Immokalee Culinary Accelerator to promote and expand businesses. 4-6 Strategy 4 Develop incentives to create opportunities for graduates of the Culinary Accelerator to stay in the Immokalee Community. Strategy 5 Partner with agricultural businesses to evaluate and support opportunities for agrotourism. Objective 4.2.2.10 Expand the availability and quality of internet service, broadband, and beyond. Strategy 1 Prepare and maintain an inventory of available computer and internet service providers in Immokalee. Strategy 2 Support rural broadband internet access initiatives and evaluate the potential to initiate a broadband program for the Immokalee Community. Goal 4.2.3: Housing Provide a mix of housing types and price points to allow for safe, high -quality dwelling unit options in Immokalee. Objective 4.2.3.1 Support multigenerational housing opportunities in Immokalee. Strategy 1 Update the 2011 Immokalee Housing Condition Inventory every five years to identify current conditions and evaluate progress on housing improvements. Strategy 2 Coordinate with Collier County to evaluate Land Development Code regulations to support the development of accessory dwelling units. Strategy 3 Collaborate with housing providers to leverage funds and seek additional funding to expand housing options in Immokalee. Strategy 4 Partner with housing providers to create incentives for housing rehabilitation and replacement, including the replacement of mobile/manufactured homes built prior to 1994 as identified in Collier County SHIP guidelines. Strategy 5 Coordinate with housing agencies and providers to promote strategies to maintain and improve the affordable housing inventory and add housing to serve a mix of income levels. Strategy 6 Partner with Collier County to develop or expand programs to improve affordable housing options (no more than 30% of gross income is spent on housing costs, including utilities) for both housing renovations and new construction. Strategy 7 Collaborate with housing providers to establish transitional housing options for the homeless population in the community. 4-7 Objective 4.2.3.2 Neighborhood Initiative: Create a holistic approach to neighborhood revitalization to improve infrastructure, housing, and safety. Strategy 1 Support the Immokalee Area Master Plan Neighborhood Planning Initiative to develop neighborhood improvement plans based on the Neighborhood Map (Exhibit A). Strategy 2 Improve vacant and nuisance properties to restore community appearance and safety. Strategy Partner with Code Enforcement, Collier County Sheriff's Office, and Community Task Force to bring properties into Code compliance. Strategy 4 Support Community Policing initiatives where identified as a need during neighborhood planning efforts. Strategy 5 Develop incentives to facilitate the development and redevelopment of residential properties to enhance neighborhoods with housing, recreational amenities, or community gardens. Strategy 6 Evaluate a land acquisition program to acquire properties that have Code violations, tax liens, or other blighted conditions so they may be redeveloped. Strategy 7 Coordinate with Collier County housing staff, regulators, and housing providers to review and consider incentives to improve the types, quantity, and quality of housing in the ICRA. Goal 4.2.4: Infrastructure Maintain a high quality of life for all residents and visitors of Immokalee. Objective 4.2.4.1 Improve water quality by partnering and supporting stormwater improvements. Strategy 1 Coordinate with County Divisions to ensure stormwater improvements are implemented at the time of other infrastructure projects. Strategy 2 Support the implementation of the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan through partnerships with Collier County in efforts to construct improvements and pursue grants and funding opportunities. Objective 4.2.4.2 Promote and improve walking as a safe and inviting mode of travel through a comprehensive network of pedestrian facilities. Strategy 1 Evaluate any new development project and identify the opportunity to incorporate the principles of complete streets when feasible to increase the safety of commuters walking 4-8 or using transit to get to work through design and construction of sidewalks, stormwater improvements, streetlighting, road resurfacing and striping, broadband, and shade trees. Strategy 2 Collaborate with other County Departments to efficiently use resources to complete the Sidewalk Master Plan. (See Exhibit B for Sidewalk Master Plan) Strategy 3 Coordinate with partners to implement the Sidewalk Master Plan. (See Exhibit B for Sidewalk Master Plan) Strategy 4 Complete improvements identified in Sidewalk Master Plan Focus Area 1 and Focus Area 2 as funds become available. Focus Area 1— Lake Trafford Road Area (see Exhibit B-Map 2) Focus Area 2 -South Immokalee (see Exhibit B-Map 3) Strategy 5 Distribute public awareness notices or materials about the rights and responsibilities of pedestrians. Strategy 6 Support walking as a recreational activity and evaluate the feasibility of a walking trail around the South 91h Street and West Eustis Avenue stormwater pond. Strategy 7 Coordinate with County and State agencies and non-profit organizations to plan and implement local and regional trail and pathway connections. Objective 4.2.4.3 Promote mobility through interconnected street patterns and improved roadway conditions. Strategy 1 Support Collier County initiatives to bring all public roads up to County standards. Strategy 2 Assist Collier County in the implementation of a program to bring private roads up to County acceptance standards. Objective 4.2.4.4 Improve and maintain water quality standards and waste management services. Strategy 1 Support and coordinate with Collier County Waste Management Division to educate commercial and residential customers on the benefits, policies, and procedures to provide a clean environment and improve the aesthetic appearance of the community. Strategy 2 Develop initiatives and incentives that facilitate the proper disposal of trash and recyclables by businesses and residents. Strategy 3 Coordinate with Collier County to support the Collier County Adopt the Road program to educate the community on the program and encourage participation. 4-9 Objective 4.2.4.5 Maintain a high quality of life for all residents and visitors of Immokalee through recreational opportunities. Strategy 1 Partner and coordinate with Collier County Parks and Recreation to provide high quality recreational opportunities in the community. (See Exhibit C for Parks and Open Space Map) Strategy 2 Support the enhancement and maintenance of recreational facilities that serve a multi - generational and culturally diverse population through partnerships with Collier County Parks and Recreation, private donors, and nonprofit organizations. Strategy 3 Support the addition of amenities that will increase visitor use at tourist destination locations including Lake Trafford, Roberts Ranch, and Pepper Ranch. Strategy 4 Continue to support Zocalo Park as a Main Street amenity and a safe and well -maintained community gathering place. Objective 4.2.4.6 Improve transit services in Immokalee. Strategy 1 Support expanded transit services and choices in Immokalee. Strategy 2 Partner with Collier Area Transit (CAT) to complete transit amenities at bus stops. (See Exhibit D for Transit Stop Improvements Map) Strategy 3 Support efforts that improve the interconnectivity of the street network to expand transit opportunities. Strategy 4 Evaluate options to provide on -demand shuttle service (micro -transit) between homes and transit stops and support, if feasible. Strategy 5 Partner with CAT to improve access, frequency, and expanded times of transit service. Objective 4.2.4.7 Maintain and improve coordination with private and independent service and utility providers such as Immokalee Water and Sewer, Immokalee Fire Control District, Lee County Electric Cooperative (LCEC) and others. Strategy 1 Invite partners to participate in ICRA goal setting workshops and preliminary project kick- off meetings to discuss the development of conceptual designs. Strategy 2 Partner with service providers to ensure adequate services are available to meet future demand. 4-10 Strategy 3 Inform utility agencies and service providers of redevelopment goals and objectives, and work with them toward aligning their planning of service level improvements. Goal 4.2. 5 Implementation/Administration Maximize resources through collaboration between County, State, and Federal agencies to achieve the CRA goals and objectives. Objective 4.2.5.1 Comply with fiscal, legal, and ethical standards as required by Federal, State, and local mandates. Strategy 1 Provide opportunities for training on redevelopment laws, ethics, and plan implementation for the CRA Board, Advisory Board members, and staff. Strategy 2 Comply with State reporting requirements. Objective 4.2.5.2 Where applicable, seek funding partners and grants to implement the Redevelopment Plan and leverage resources. Strategy 1 Provide administrative support consistent with Florida Statutes to implement the plan. Strategy 2 Actively participate in organizations that are aligned with the goals and objectives of the Plan to identify potential partnerships to leverage resources. Strategy 3 Develop a project evaluation checklist to verify projects are in alignment with Plan goals. Strategy 4 Conduct a quarterly review of Plan implementation and a five-year Plan review to evaluate and recommend necessary amendments to align the goals, objectives, and strategies and funding with conditions of the community at the time of review. Objective 4.2.5.3 Coordinate with the Immokalee Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU). Strategy 1 Incorporate the Immokalee Beautification MSTU into planning and implementation processes for ICRA improvements. Strategy 2 Coordinate and partner with the Immokalee Beautification MSTU to leverage funding for project implementation. 4-11 Objective 4.2.5.4 Ensure a targeted and balanced distribution of CRA planning and implementation efforts. Strategy 1 Account for both need -based and geographic considerations in the distribution of planning and implementation efforts. Strategy 2 Identify street blocks or neighborhoods for targeted comprehensive improvements with a focus on blocks or neighborhoods that have already received some improvements. Strategy 3 Provide education and support to help ensure that improvements are properly maintained. Strategy 4 The CRA will coordinate with Collier County Growth Management Department for updates to the Land Development Code to support redevelopment in Immokalee. 4-12 4.3 Background and Baseline Data On March 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) made a determination that a blighted area existed in the area now known as the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area and there was a need for a redevelopment agency to implement the revitalization of this blighted area. Based on this determination, the BCC adopted Resolution 2000-82 and Resolution 2000-83 establishing the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) pursuant to Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes. The members of the BCC are also the members of the Collier County CRA. The Collier County CRA covers two redevelopment areas: the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area and the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area. The redevelopment efforts are guided by the Community Redevelopment Plan. The Community Redevelopment Plan was originally adopted in 2000 (Resolution 2000-181) for a thirty-year timeframe with expiration in 2030. The Community Redevelopment Plan is made up of three components: matters relating to the Collier County CRA, the Redevelopment Plan initiatives for the Immokalee area, and the Redevelopment Plan initiatives for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle area. This Section 4, including the exhibit series in Section 4.6, contains Redevelopment Plan initiatives specific to the Immokalee area. In 2019, the BCC adopted an amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan which updated the map for the ICRA boundaries (Resolution 2019-75). Redevelopment efforts are primarily funded using tax increment revenues as outlined in Ordinance 2000- 042 which established the CRA Trust Fund. About Immokalee Immokalee means "my home" in the Mikasuki language. Located in eastern Collier County, Immokalee started as a cattle ranch town in the 1800s and has grown into a culturally diverse rural agriculture community, rich in history. The community is known as the prime producer of winter vegetables for the eastern United States. The Immokalee Urban designated area is a community of approximately 30 square miles, or±17,116 acres; the Redevelopment Area boundary extends beyond the urban area boundary and contains a total of +24,386 acres, including Lake Trafford and lands designated as Rural Land Stewardship Areas on the Collier County Future Land Use Map. Located approximately 40 miles from the award - winning Naples Paradise Coast, there are significant differences in housing stock, income levels, and education attainment between Immokalee and coastal Collier County. The Seminole Tribe of Florida owns approximately 600 acres of land in the southern part of Immokalee. As of 2021, there were 161 members of the Tribe living on the Immokalee Seminole Tribe Reservation. The Seminole Tribe owns and operates the Immokalee Casino which is a major destination for visitors and residents in Collier County. The Immokalee Casino, which opened in 1994, is one of seven casinos the Tribe owns. The Casino has expanded over the years and now includes a 99-room hotel and 10,000 square foot event space. The Tribe is currently building a Trading Post on Immokalee Road and a new Medical Clinic and Public Safety Building to serve the Tribal members on ten acres of Tribal land along Seminole Crossing Trail. Future plans include adding additional housing, a Multiuse Sports Complex, swimming pool, and Senior Center. 4-13 Vision Statement: Immokalee Area Master Plan (2019) In 2018, the Collier County Growth Management Department began a restudy of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (TAMP), a separate element of Collier County's Comprehensive Plan. The IAMP includes two main parts: The Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) and the Land Use Designation sections. The Immokalee Local Redevelopment Planning Board (Advisory Board) and CRA staff were involved in the process of engaging the public and putting forth updates to the TAMP. In December 2019, the BCC adopted the new TAMP, which explains the Immokalee community's vision as follows: The 2019 Plan focuses on redefining its future, revitalizing its community and developing a new mission that focuses on strengthening and diversifying its economy, embracing cultural diversity, and welcoming visitors to "this place we call home." The community defined its vision as: Immokalee is a family -oriented community that supports a healthy lifestyle. It is attractive, environmentally sustainable and offers a full range of housing, recreation and education opportunities to meet all residents' needs. Immokalee has a safe, well- connected network to walk and bicycle about town, as well as a roadway network needed to support the transport of goods and services. Business and job opportunities flourish in trade and distribution, agri-business, and ecotourism. The GOPs of the Immokalee Area Master Plan set forth the strategies to achieve this vision. This 2022 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan builds on and is consistent with the 2019 Immokalee Area Master Plan. Redevelopment Plan Update Process At the start of preparation of this 2022 Redevelopment Plan, the goals, objectives, policies and status of implementation of the existing 2000 Redevelopment Plan and the 2019 Immokalee Area Master Plan were reviewed. To further understand current conditions and projected conditions going forward, data collection and spatial and quantitative analysis was conducted beginning in December 2020. The findings of this review and analysis were then presented to the community in March 2021 to validate goals and objectives and gather input. Community outreach included hybrid (in -person and virtual) community presentations to the Advisory Board and other community organizations, online surveys, small group sessions and one-on-one interviews. Eight primary themes were initially identified and discussed as areas of focus for the community: culture; recreation; economic development; community facilities; housing; transportation; ecotourism and agrotourism; and stormwater. Generally, the themes and goals identified in the 2019 Immokalee Area Master Plan were validated, and the breadth of community input demonstrated that there is high level of engagement and a significant number of needs in Immokalee. Through the community engagement process, the focus areas for the 2022 Redevelopment Plan were identified as: celebrating culture, economic development, housing, and infrastructure. See Exhibit E for a summary of the input received. 4-14 2000 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan & Implementation Review The 2000 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan included the following three goals: Economic Development Goal: Diversify the economic base of the community by focusing on agricultural production, processing and research; industrial development including manufacturing, distribution and aviation services; and nature tourism. Housing Goal: To provide safe, affordable housing to all zone residents. Community Image Goal: To enhance the image and the perception of the Community as a safe, friendly; family -oriented small town. The redevelopment efforts over the past nineteen years can be witnessed throughout the community. Improvements to stormwater systems, pedestrian safety, public realm, and the development of quality affordable housing has resulted in increased property values and quality of life. The tax increment revenues generated over the past 21 years totals $10,309,035. Some key projects over the past 19 years were achieved using tax increment financing (TIF) funds or by leveraging TIF funds with grant funds as listed below: 2007 Allocation of $250,000 in TIF funds to assist with the establishment of a Florida State University (FSU) School of Medicine rural health training center in Immokalee. 2008 Allocation of $600,000 in TIF funds for the infrastructure development of Esperanza Place located on Immokalee Drive, which includes 62 affordable housing owner -occupied units and 176 affordable housing rental units. 2010 The CRA was awarded $3.5 million in Disaster Recovery Initiative (DRI) funds from Collier County Community & Human Services for Phase I of the Downtown Immokalee Stormwater Improvement Project. The project was completed in 2012 which consisted of approximately 17,000 linear feet of new concrete drainage pipe, 200 drainage structures, 110 square yards of asphalt restoration, 52,000 square yards of sod and a 6.5-acre stormwater retention pond. 2012 The CRA was awarded $994,000 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the land acquisition of two parcels (0.58 acres) and the construction design build activities for properties located at the corner of 1st Street and Main Street to establish a "gateway" public plaza (now known as Zocalo Public Plaza) into the Immokalee Community. The construction of First Street Zocalo Public Plaza was completed. Creating a public gathering place for community activities and host of the annual Holiday Tree lighting event. 2014/2015 Two projects were completed to implement the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan. Immokalee Drive & North 16th Street Project and Colorado Avenue from South First to South Ninth Streets. Funding sources included TIF funds, South Florida Water Management District, and Florida Department of Economic Opportunity grant funds totaling approximately $3,500,000. 4-15 2016 The CRA was awarded $600,000 in CDBG funds to construct Phase 1 Sidewalk improvements in the South Immokalee area. An additional $141,498 in TIF funds and MSTU funds were used to complete the project. Construction was completed in March 2018. 2018 The CRA was awarded $676,365 in CDBG funds to construct Phase 2 Sidewalk improvements in the South Immokalee area. The project was achieved using TIF funds of $220,070 and MSTU funds of $94,679. The project was completed in 2021. 2018 The CRA awarded a $30,000 grant to Residential Options of Florida (ROOF) for renovations to a single family home to establish Independence Place located in Immokalee, providing affordable housing to individuals with special needs. Additionally, TIF funds have been used for the Immokalee Commercial Fagade Improvement Grant Program. Since the program's inception in 2008, the CRA has awarded approximately $295,000 to 17 businesses to improve the fagades of existing buildings. The CRA has successfully partnered with other Collier County Divisions including Parks and Recreation, Collier Area Transit, and Stormwater to leverage funding to improve Immokalee. Ongoing dialogue with Collier County Code Enforcement and the Collier County Sheriff's Department has resulted in safer neighborhoods and improved the general quality of life in Immokalee. Non-profit organizations in Immokalee have established a network of high -quality community services and well -designed facilities including a charter school, day care facilities, and student learning and after - school centers. The overall quality of the housing stock has improved over the years as non-profit housing developers have constructed both farmworker rental housing and fee simple single family affordable housing units. Initiatives of the 2000 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan The CRA was created to facilitate the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the community. CRAB cannot exercise authority until a finding of necessity is determined by county or municipality, as required by Section 163.355, Florida Statutes. This determination must be adopted and supported by data and analysis finding that the conditions in the area meets specific criteria described in Section 163.340, Florida Statutes. The main conditions of blight identified as part of the 2000 planning process remain valid and part of the CRA's purpose going forward. Figure 4-2 provides an overview of these findings and identifies the Goals, Objectives, Strategies and actions and projects in the 2022 Redevelopment Plan that work toward continuing to address these conditions. 4-16 Figure 4-2 —2022 Plan Goals & Initiatives that Address 2000 Plan Issues Goal 4.2.4 • Inadequate street layout and design Infrastructure • Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide Exhibit B Sidewalk Predominance of drainage swales Master Plan defective or • Poor access to commercial and industrial inadequate street parking and access problems Exhibit Q Framework layout • Few sidewalks available for a Map predominately pedestrian population • A general lack of neighborhood Section 4.4.1 Action connections to each other Plan - Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative • Many C-4 and C-5 lots do not meet minimum lot size and lot width • Existing buildings are frequently non- Goal 4.2.3 Housing conforming (lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers) Objective 4.2.5.4 Faulty lot layout in relation to size, . Majority of RMF-6 lots are non - adequacy, accessibility, conforming, and rebuilding would require Section 4.4.1 Action or usefulness variance Plan - Neighborhood • 50% of platted lots in South Immokalee Revitalization Initiative are non -conforming • Majority of mobile home parks do not meet minimum standards and permitted densities Goal 4.2.3 Housing • Many households lack complete plumbing Goal 4.2.4 for exclusive use Infrastructure • Renter occupied units are overcrowded • Lack of sidewalks Exhibit B Sidewalk Unsanitary or unsafe Master Plan conditions . Lack of street lighting in residential neighborhoods Exhibit Q Framework • Inefficient wide, deep open swales in Map South Immokalee • Lack of adequate dumpsters Section 4.4.1 Action Plan - Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative Goal 4.2.4 Deterioration of site or • Surface water management problems Infrastructure other improvements (flooding on local roads) Section 4.4.1 Action Plan 4-17 Tax or special assessment Objective 4.2.3.2 delinquency exceeding N / A Neighborhood Initiative the fair value of the land Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title Objective 4.2.3.2 which prevent the free N / A Neighborhood Initiative alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area Baseline Data The following information provides a general overview of the current conditions in Immokalee that helped guide the development of goals, objectives, and strategies of this 2022 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan. Population Data Population data was collected from 2019 U.S. Census data in the Census Designated Place (CDP) of Immokalee, as indicated within the boundary outlined on the map below. The Immokalee CDP had a total population of 25,855. The following tables provide additional population data on the Immokalee CDP. The Immokalee CDP boundary is smaller than the Immokalee CRA boundary but represents the best available data dataset for analysis. GEOGRAPHY POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE 1,064 LAND AREA IN SQUARE MILES 22.7 4-18 FAMILY & LIVING ARRANGEMENTS HOUSEHOLDS _ PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD LIVING IN SAME HOUSE 1 YEAR AGO 5,985 4.32 80.8% LANGUAGE OTHER THAN ENGLISH SPOKEN AT HOME 80.0% Since the Collier County Property Appraiser also collects housing information, additional data was obtained specifically for the Immokalee CRA. Based on January 2020 Collier County Property Appraiser information, there are a total of 6,870 housing units in the ICRA. Of the total units, 47% or 3,237 are classified as Single Family; 2,313 are classified as Multi -Family; and 1,320 are classified as mobile homes. See Exhibit F for a map of these housing types within the ICRA. HOUSING UNITS OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING 37.8% MEDIAN VALUE OWNER -OCCUPIED $121,200 MEDIAN MONTHLY OWNER MORTGAGE COST MEDIAN GROSS RENT $798 LABOR FORCE PERCENT OF POPULATION 16 YEARS AND 68.2% OLDER IN LABOR FORCE FEMALE PERCENT OF POPULATION 16 YEARS 57.4% AND OLDER IN LABOR FORCE INCOME & POVERTY MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 1jr $30,885 PER CAPITA INCOME $12,149 PERSONS IN POVERTY 37.4% COMPUTER & INTERNET USE HOUSEHOLD WITH A COMPUTER HOUSEHOLDS WITH BROADBAND 76% 54.9% For comparison, the 2019 American Survey Reports from the U.S. Census Bureau reported for Collier County as a whole, 95% of households had a computer and 88.8% of individuals had broadband internet subscriptions. Over 95% of the students at Immokalee High School are classified as economically needy. However, the graduation rate of Immokalee High School increased from 67% to 90% in 2016 (Source: 2017 TIGER grant application). 4-19 EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL GRAD OR HIGHER 40.1% BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR HIGHER 5.2% Land Use Data Based on 2020 Zoning designations, 69% of the property within the CRA is zoned agricultural. Two percent (2%) is zoned commercial and only 3% is zoned industrial. While agriculture is the primary industry in Immokalee, the limited amount of property currently zoned for commercial and industrial uses limits the opportunity for expansion of those sectors (see Exhibit G for a Zoning Map). The Immokalee Future Land Use Map does designate 7% of the land as Industrial and 4% as commercial (see Exhibit H for a Future Land Use Map). Properties that fall within the Future Land Use Map designations of industrial and commercial will be able to seek rezoning without a need for a Growth Management Plan amendment, which will expediate the development review process. Housing Data In 2011, the CRA and the Immokalee Housing Collaboration commissioned the Immokalee Housing Condition Inventory which updated the 2004 study completed by the Collier County Development and Environmental Services Division (CDES). The Immokalee Housing Collaboration is comprised of the Collier County Housing Authority, The Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida, I HOPE, and Immokalee Housing and Family Services. The 2011 report evaluated both exterior structural and property conditions through a "windshield survey." The 2011 survey included a total of 6,268 units. The survey found 86% of all units were in standard condition based on their exterior, while 701 units needed maintenance in one or more categories (roof, the siding, windows, and doors); 133 units were considered substandard and in need of repair in several areas; 63 units were deteriorated; and 19 units were considered dilapidated. In 2017, the Richard M. Shultz Family Foundation (RMSFF) funded the Collier County: Community Needs and Asset Assessment. RMSFF and its Community Assessment Advisory Committee guided the development of the report. The report noted the following: About 40% of Collier County residents qualify as "housing -cost burdened" — paying more than 30% of their income on rent or mortgages. High housing costs can lead to poor housing conditions which can result in substandard housing, a concern in the Immokalee area. The report states that "housing and property conditions in the Immokalee Community have been significantly poorer than the conditions in the county as a whole." The report acknowledges improvements in housing over the years due to better code enforcement and due to major efforts by nonprofit organizations to build new structures and repair existing units. During focus group meetings in Immokalee, participants noted rent abuse and overcrowding conditions as prevalent in the community. 4-20 The report recognizes income inequality as a cause of concern and notes that to improve happiness and the quality of life of county residents a focus on training programs and educational opportunities that align with occupation growth in high paying occupations is needed. Farmworker Housing is prevalent and an important asset to the economic base of Immokalee. In September 2021, the Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health reported a total sleeping capacity for 3,356 farmworkers among the following facilities: 42 H2A Migrant Camps; 1 HUD Housing (Horizon Village); 10 Migrant Labor Camps; and 49 Residential Migrant Housing accommodations. The same square footage is used for all types of housing to calculate capacity in terms of sleeping area capacity, which is 50 square feet per person, and common area capacity, which is 100 square feet per person. Other factors can limit the sleeping capacity, such as number of toilets, refrigerators, stoves, and sinks. These units are regulated and inspected by the Department of Health. The influx of annual farmworkers typically exceeds the capacity. The additional demand is often handled by structures that are not regulated. On September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall in the coast of Collier County and severely impacted the Immokalee Community. Early damage reports conducted by Collier County reported 16 units destroyed and 67 with major damage. Irma brought the community together, and the Immokalee Unmet Needs Coalition (IUNC) was formed to assist with rebuilding the area. In 2018, the IUNC and the CRA developed a Disaster Recovery and Resiliency Plan focusing on housing and infrastructure needs in the community following Hurricane Irma's impact. As part of the recovery efforts after Hurricane Irma, 170 housing units were rehabilitated through December 2019. It is updated annually and provides a two-phase approach to project priorities. Updated in October 2020, the Disaster Recovery and Resiliency Plan identifies the following Phase 1 priorities: - Land Acquisition for Housing Development - Rental Housing Development - Homeownership Development - Owner -Occupied Rehabilitation Assistance and Hardening Program - Replacement or Acquisition Program - Demolition of substandard units Phase 2 priorities include: - Rental Repair Program — limited to four units or less with restrictions to maintain affordability - GAP Insurance - a pool of funds created to help individuals who face shortages in covering repair costs due to either high insurance deductibles or depreciation expenses IUNC partners include Florida Rural Neighborhoods, Mennonite Disaster Service, The Salvation Army, Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Guadalupe Center, Community Foundation of Collier County, American Red Cross, and Habitat for Humanity. Collier County Community Services also assisted with providing local funding for rehabilitation to qualifying participants. The IUNC Housing Committee consists of local non-profit housing providers and meets periodically to maintain communication and progress on housing development in Immokalee. 4-21 The Immokalee Community is known for supporting the needs of extended family members. Multigenerational Living is defined by the Collier County Consolidated Plan (2021-2026) as a home with three or more generations. The 2010 US Census reported 118,258 households in Collier County and 2.6% or 3,022 household were in multigenerational households. There are three Senior Housing complexes in Immokalee with a total of 115 units. There are no assisted living or memory care facilities in Immokalee. Immokalee Friendship House was founded in 1987 to provide emergency shelter in the community and continues today under the management of the non-profit organization St. Matthew's House. The facility currently provides 44 beds. Services have expanded to include addictions counseling, transitional housing, and job training. The organization coordinates with the Collier County Homeless Coalition to assist with providing services to the homeless population. Mobility & Walkable Community Data The 2000 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan identified the need for additional sidewalks for Immokalee's predominantly pedestrian population. During the past 20 years, staff has coordinated with transportation partners to identify needs and to implement improvements. The CRA and the Immokalee Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) have applied for and received funds to construct sidewalks throughout the community in locations where the highest concentrations of pedestrians exist and where the lack of a sidewalks poses the greatest threat to the pedestrian. Projects also include the removal and replacement of existing deteriorating and/or unsafe features from within the County right-of-way. In 2011, the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) prepared the Immokalee Walkability Study. According to the study, a "walkable" neighborhood is "defined as a neighborhood that has compact residential development, a mix of land uses, and a well-connected street network." The CRA and MSTU have completed two sidewalk projects in the South Immokalee Area in the timeframe of 2017-2021. See Exhibit B-Map 2, Sidewalk Master Plan Focus Area 2 for a depiction of this area. Both sidewalk projects improved pedestrian and vehicular safety, and connected recreational, educational, and commercial destinations. The construction of the new sidewalks also included improvements to the local drainage systems. In 2017, Collier County applied for the TIGER IX Grant to implement the Immokalee Complete Streets Project. The application reported that 47% of the population of Immokalee use public transit or bicycle to get to work or walk to work and 23% of residents do not have access to a vehicle. The application further reported that between 2005 and 2017, there were 147 pedestrian -involved collisions and 93 bicycle - involved collisions in Immokalee and 63% of the streets have no sidewalks. The County was awarded the $13 million TIGER (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) Grant to fund the Immokalee Complete Streets project. The total project was estimated at $16,415,864. Funding sources are FHWA grant funds, which equate to 80% or $13,132,691, with Collier County matching funds equal to 20% or $3,283,173. The project includes design and construction of 20 miles of concrete sidewalks, a bike boulevard network, a shared -use path, street lighting, bus shelters, a new transit center, landscaping, drainage improvements, and intersection and traffic calming treatments. The design/build contract, in the amount of $22,869,280, was awarded in December 2021. Collier County 4-22 contributed an additional $6,453,416 to implement the project. The project is set to start in 2022 and construction is tentatively scheduled to be completed in 2024. The Immokalee Complete Streets project will transform the neighborhoods within the project area by connecting key community destinations including educational, recreational and employment services. See Exhibit I for the Project Area Map for the Immokalee Complete Streets Project. The bicycle boulevard network will enhance first/last mile transit access via bike, and the new transit transfer station will improve access within the community as well as travel to coastal Collier County. Regional Transportation Data There are several state roadways that intersect in the Immokalee Community. This puts Immokalee in position to become a logistics center for the region. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is investing hundreds of millions of dollars in regional roadway improvements to improve the connections through Immokalee to the economic centers of Miami, Orlando, Tampa and beyond via connections to the Interstate Highway system. FDOT schedules for an estimated $25 million improvement along 3.5 miles of SR 82 and a roundabout at the intersection of SR 82 and SR 29 to be completed in 2022. See Exhibit J for a Regional Transportation Map. Economic Development Data The Immokalee Community has several economic development incentive programs available to spur private sector investment into the community. In 2017, three census tracts in Immokalee were designated as Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ), including one that covers the Immokalee Regional Airport. Created by the Jobs Act of 2017, a QOZ allows private investors the opportunity to defer capital gain taxes by investing in targeted communities. In addition, a portion of the community was designated in 2016 as a Promise Zone. The Promise Zone designation provides preference for certain competitive federal grant programs and technical assistance and potential tax incentives if enacted by Congress. A map of the incentive program areas is included in Exhibit K. Immokalee QOZ Census Tracts MEDIAN HH POPULATION CENSUS TRACT POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS INCOME GROWTH 112.05 2,778 676 $22,337 13.5% 113.01 4,768 1,012 $30,508 28.7% 114 (AIRPORT) 5,310 916 $46,711 24.4% Source: U.S. Census American Community Survey In 2001, the Immokalee Community received designation from the State as a Rural Area of Economic Concern. The program has evolved over the years, but the primary mission has remained the same — to market, facilitate and advocate for regional economic development in the rural communities in the state of Florida. As of 2016, Immokalee is included in the South Central Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) and is a member of the Florida Heartland Economic Region of Opportunity (FHERO). FHERO partners include six counties Desoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Okeechobee, the Cities of Belle Glade, Pahokee and South Bay in Palm Beach County and the Community of Immokalee. The benefits of being a designated RAO include additional points for grant scoring, State approved economic development incentives for 4-23 rural communities including the Governor's ability to waive criteria for any economic development incentive. FHERO is a 501(c) 6 nonprofit organization that provides grant opportunities to implement marketing and strategic planning for the partners. As a member of FHERO, the Immokalee Community collaborates with the other South Central Florida RAO members to market and advocacy for economic development incentives and opportunities in rural Central Florida. Through this partnership, the Immokalee Community receives marketing and technical assistance to advance economic development opportunities in 1'iliit W1i'- FHERO has provided funding to complete a retail demand assessment and marketing materials. In addition, a preliminary site development analysis for a 2.8-acre parcel at the Immokalee Regional Airport was completed in 2021. According to the April 2021 Immokalee Retail Demand Assessment, Immokalee has a relatively low median age (29.3) due largely to a high percentage of children. Median household income ranges from $23,500 to $32,000. Local incomes in Immokalee are likely underreported given the amount of cash employment available to residents, which makes it challenging when recruiting new commercial establishments. Some of the key findings of the Report include: 1. Lack of new supply added 2. Existing inventory is dated and insufficient from a functionality/sustainability standpoint 3. Existing Inventory is small in size. Nearly 70% is under 5,000 square feet. 4. Lack of lease options available 5. Current deficits in numerous retail industry groups 6. Current need for an additional 111,515 square feet of retail space The report identified only three tapestry segments for the 10-mile radius from the center of Immokalee — and 70% of the households fall into two categories: Valley Growers and American Dreamers — both a subset of the Ethnic Enclave Life Mode. "Tapestry segmentation" according to the April 2021 Immokalee Retail Demand Assessment, is a market segmentation system designed to identify consumer markets in the United States. Residual households fall into the "Down the Road" subset of the Rustic Outpost Life Mode. This information is helpful when targeting commercial establishment evaluating the consumer base. Below is a brief overview of the two primary Tapestry Segments. Valley Growers are typically young Hispanic families with children and frequently multi - generations living in the same house. "This market is all about spending time with family, taking care of family and home, and following Hispanic heritage." American Dreamers typically own their homes, further from city center where housing is more affordable. "The majority of the households include younger married -couple families with children and frequently grandparents. Diversity is high; many residents are foreign born, of Hispanic origin. Hard work and sacrifice have improved their economic circumstances. Spending is focused more on the members of the household than the home. This market is adept on accessing what they want on the Internet." 4-24 Exhibit L provides the Key Findings section of the report. According to the August 2021 Greater Naples Chamber - Chamber Connect Economic Indicators Report: "Collier County is at risk of increasing gaps in jobs and talent. In order to fulfill the demand for goods and services of our growing population, the Florida Chamber estimates we will need an increase of 44K net new jobs by 2030. The 2020 Census put Collier County's population at 393K with an estimated increase of 10% by 2025. While the population continues to grow, Collier County has 1.5 times the national average of potential retirees and 30% fewer millennials than the national average to fill the gap." Immokalee Regional Airport is located on 1,300 acres within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area and is approximately 35 miles from coastal Naples, 10 miles from the new town of Ave Maria, and 110 miles northwest of the Port of Miami. Originally used as an Army Air Corps training base during World War II, the base was later abandoned. The Federal Surplus Act turned the airport over to Collier County in the 1960s. In 1993, the Collier County Airport Authority was created to oversee the development and management of three publicly owned general aviation airports in the County: Immokalee, Marco Island and Everglade City. Over the years, grants have been awarded to improve the Immokalee Regional Airport and develop it as a catalyst for economic development. In 2019 the Immokalee Regional Airport Airport Layout Plan (ALP) was completed and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The Immokalee Regional Airport ALP is included as Exhibit M and depicts the airport boundaries, existing infrastructure, and identifies proposed airport development over a 20-year period. The planning period for the ALP is 2017-2037. It forecasted an average annual growth rate of aircraft operations at 1.35% resulting in a total of 48,400 forecasted aircraft operations by 2037, an increase of 11,900 above its current rate of 36,500. Total development costs to achieve the planned improvements are estimated at $47 million from a variety of federal, state, local, and private funding sources. The ALP includes a number of capital improvements based on future demand. Below is the list of projects and current status. Runway 18-36 Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of Runway 18-36 will be complete in May 2022. The improvements were upgraded to include additional lighting and taxiway alignment. Taxiway C Extension: Project completed August 2021. Additional Hangar Capacity: Global Flight Training School was approved to build a three -hangar development. With construction anticipated to commence during the final quarter of 2022. An Invitation to Negotiate process has commenced for additional development and will continue into FY22. Security Upgrades: Anticipated completion December 2022. Full Perimeter Access Road: Environmental Assessment for Airpark Boulevard is anticipated for 2024. Design for airside perimeter road is pending Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funding eligibility with the FAA. 4-25 Runway 9-27 Extension: Extend 7,000 feet anticipated for 2029, if justified. The Immokalee Airport Land Use Development Plan identifies the following: Non -Aeronautical (233 Acres): Targeted for Business, Manufacturing, Shipping, and Storage Aeronautical (276 Acres): Targeted for T-Hangars, conventional Hangars, Maintenance Repair Overhaul (MRO); Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) and Cargo The Immokalee Regional Airport provides an opportunity for business development at low land lease rates (based on current rate, the first year rate is $.1533 per square foot). However, the ownership of the land must remain with the Collier County Airport Authority as mandated by the FAA per AIP grant assurances which can be a challenge for business recruitment. The FAA will consider approving a 40-year land lease with an option to renew; however, those terms often are not satisfactory to a new business seeking to make a substantial financial investment. The Collier County Airport Authority markets the available industrial parcels suitable for a wide variety of permissible industrial uses with access to onsite Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) with very affordable lease rates. Collier County Mosquito Control and the U.S. National Guard Training Center (Immokalee Readiness Center) are expected to be new tenants at the Airport in the next few years per final lease agreements negotiated in 2022. The development of these governmental facilities is expected to increase consumer retail demand within the community and generate more development opportunity at the Airport. Located within the Immokalee Regional Airport is The Florida Culinary Accelerator @ Immokalee, providing a state-of-the-art commercial kitchen open to a membership base. As noted on the website, depending on the membership level, members may select from a range of customized hours and plans to prepare, cook and package their culinary creations for distribution. The culinary accelerator's goal is to support area chefs, farmers, and small food businesses achieve their dreams of growing their food businesses and entering the competitive retail marketplace. One of the challenges that chefs, farmers, and small food business face is finding a suitable space for start-up businesses once they reach capacity at the accelerator. The Immokalee Technical College (iTECH) is a state -of -the art technical training center, providing career and technical education programs for high school students and adults. In addition to the post -secondary adult career and technical training programs, iTECH also offers ABE/GED and adult literacy programs. All programs have active business partners who function beyond the traditional advisory capacity found in most technical schools. Under their model, local businesses and associations adopt programs and serve as foundations for curriculum development, financial assistance, connection activities (internships, job shadowing opportunities, professional in residence, etc.), and job placement assistance for graduates. Programs range from Computer Systems and Information Technology to Heavy Equipment Service Technician training. Other Infrastructure & Service Providers The Immokalee Water and Sewer District provides service throughout the ICRA. A service map of Immokalee and the Five Year Estimated Capital Improvements Plan is provided in Exhibit N. This 4-26 independent district oversees the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (2022-2026) includes approximately $34.3 million in wastewater system improvements and $6.6 million in water system improvements plus $11 million in general project improvements. Approximately, 32.2% percent of Immokalee Urban Area has centralized water and sewer services. Approximately 3.2% is developed without sewer and is privately owned. The Immokalee Fire Control District is an Independent Special Taxing District established by an act of the Florida Legislature in 1955 (Chapter 55-30666 Laws of Florida) and revised in 2000. The legislation created a fire control and rescue district covering 234 square miles of Collier County, Florida. The purpose of the District is to provide fire protection and prevention services, establish and maintain emergency medical and rescue response services, and acquire and maintain firefighting, rescue, medical, transport, and other emergency equipment. The district currently has two stations (Station 30 and 31) within the ICRA boundaries. A replacement for Station 30 is currently under construction and is tentatively scheduled to be completed in December 2022. See Exhibit O for the district map and operational details. Within the boundaries of Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, Collier County Public Schools (CCPS) currently operates five elementary schools, one middle school, one high school, one alternative center and one charter school. As of February 2022, there are 6,988 students enrolled in these CCPS facilities. See Exhibit P for additional information. Immokalee Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) The BCC created the Immokalee Beautification MSTU in 1977 for the purpose of providing streetlights and beautification within the designated boundary. In 1986, the BCC adopted Collier County Ordinance No. 86-65, creating the MSTU Advisory Committee. Over the years, the boundary, purpose and advisory board membership have been revised. A Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) is a funding mechanism where community members, with BCC approval, assess themselves to make improvements to their neighborhood and/or community area and provide additional services based on community desires. The MSTU's ordinance establishes the maximum millage rate that can be levied to implement the mission of the MSTU. Annually, the BCC approves the millage rate and budget to implement the yearly work plan. To improve coordination between CRA and the MSTU, the BCC moved the management of the MSTU under the CRA in 2011. This organizational structure has improved coordination of capital projects as well as enhanced maintenance of capital assets. The MSTU also receives a contribution from Collier County Fund 111 to assist with the general maintenance of right of way within the MSTU boundary. Over the years the CRA and the MSTU have collaborated on several projects to improve the conditions within the MSTU boundary, which is slightly smaller than the CRA boundary (See Exhibit K for a map depicting the boundaries). 4-27 4.4 Redevelopment Program The following section provides a redevelopment program for the ICRA, including the methodology for prioritizing and phasing redevelopment projects that are included in the Redevelopment Program and potential opportunities for improvement and investment in the area, as well as outlines Funding Strategies to implement the Program. The Redevelopment Program for the ICRA includes projects and activities that may be funded by the CRA or by other public agencies, non -governmental organizations, or the private sector. 4.4.1 Action Plan The following Action Plan describes the three phases of Plan implementation, outlines the criteria the CRA shall consider when prioritizing projects and initiatives, summarizes the key redevelopment opportunities to be completed in the short and mid-term, and depicts the 2022 Redevelopment Plan Projects and Programs. Prioritization and Phasi This plan recognizes three phases of initial implementation. - Phase 1: Short-term (five-year planning horizon consistent with other agencies capital project planning approach). - Phase 2: Mid-term (next 10 years) - Phase 3: Long-term (1S years through the existence of the CRA) Projects and community priorities should be evaluated every five years at a minimum to confirm consistency with the community's goals and priorities. Annual reporting of project status and adjustments in tax increment revenues will also confirm that community goals and objectives are being met. Since these projects and initiatives cannot be evaluated and carried out all at once, this section presents a prioritization plan in terms of amount of funds programmed and project/initiative timing. A key consideration for prioritization is the amount of funding available for these projects and initiatives, discussed more in Section 4.4.2. Prioritization criteria to consider include: • Funding availability from dedicated or outside sources (aside from CRA funds) • Magnitude of anticipated impact and multiplier effects • Whether planning/design has already been undertaken or completed • Project timing considerations independent of prioritization (e.g., TIGER grant improvements should be completed prior to Neighborhood Initiative commences) • Ability to address health/safety concerns • Degree of need • Geographic distribution of projects in the ICRA area • Priorities identified during annual work plan and five-year plan review 4-28 Opportunities for Redevelopment Since the adoption of the 2000 Immokalee Community Redevelopment Plan, the CRA has completed several capital projects to improve the public realm, and redevelopment efforts have been accomplished through private investment (see Section 4.3, Background and Baseline Data). Building on the success of these advancements, the CRA is ready to move forward with new and innovative proposals to continue to improve and enhance the area. As shown in Figure 4-3, the Framework Map (also see Exhibit Q) highlights opportunities and priorities the CRA will be focusing on over the next five to 11 years. Figure 4-3- Immokalee Framework Map Little League Rd Ext.: New 2-1ane rd �� i A SR29: 0 0.2 0a 08 \ — Widen from 2-lanes to 4-lanes with center turnllane Westclox Street Ext.: New 2-lane rd III1 5 r SR 29INew Market Rd W: II hP`Ji� New 4-lane rd OUJ 4 EDEEY . / IMMOKALEE REGIONAL — 3 AIRPORT TRIANGL T 7 Immokalee Rd (CR 84fi): B r .,L., r _.� Widen from 2-lanes to 4-lanes DOWNTOWN 9 2 SOUTH SR29: �® IMMOICA�EE Widen from 2-lanes to 4-12nes 8 TIGER Grant Civic Space/Community Facility Lake Trafford ECOnOm IC and Mobility Pepper Ranch Recreational and Eco-Tourism Housing & Medical Expansion Roberts Ranch Culinary Accelerator Expansion First Street Corridor Main Street Neighborhood Revitalization Immokalee Regional Airport NeteRoatl Improvements Aep�neC par Col3ler NP02tr65 LRTP Cosi Ibla Plan Prefaea. Een.1EREe only The Framework Map identifies eleven locations for potential redevelopment projects and improvements: 1. TIGER Grant —This area in the heart of the community will be transformed with sidewalk and lighting improvements funded through the Federal TIGER grant program. Once the project is completed there will be an opportunity to leverage these improvements by targeting housing initiatives in this area. 2. Civic Space/Community Facility — The CRA owns a 1.96-acre site located at the corner of Main Street and South Ninth Street. Originally purchased to create a public plaza similar to the Zocalo Park at the corner of First and Main, the site has remained vacant. Recent discussions have identified several approaches to developing the site to maximize public benefit including selling the property for commercial development; selling the property to develop a community service campus; or entering into a partnership with other public or private agencies to create a community center or community open space. 4-29 3. Lake Trafford Economic and Mobility Opportunity — Lake Trafford and Ann Olesky Park are considered a recreational jewel in the community. Lake Trafford Road that leads into the park is programed for sidewalk improvements except for the last 0.34 miles into the park. Environmental assessment is needed to determine if the pedestrian connection into the park can be completed. Coordination with the property owners surrounding the park also provides an opportunity to expand transit into the area and to expand commercial opportunities to expand eco-tourism in the area. 4. Pepper Ranch Recreational and Eco-Tourism — Pepper Ranch provides low impact recreational amenities to the public. Expansion of services and marketing the property for corporate retreats provides an opportunity to expand the eco-tourism into the area. 5. Housing & Medical Facilities Expansion — The Heritage Planned Unit Development approved in 1991 provides an opportunity to expand services and residential development in this northern section of Immokalee. The 346-acre site allows for a mix of commercial and residential units. Programmed improvements to State Road 29 will enhance this location's viability for development, offering improved access for the local community, as well as Hendry and Lee Counties. 6. Roberts Ranch —A part of the Collier County Museum system, this historic 13-acre site is in the heart of Immokalee with easy access to Main Street. Originally home to cattleman Robert Roberts and his family, this historic site and museum (the longest running ranch in South Florida) provides visitors with a rare opportunity to experience daily working life on a Southwest Florida pioneer homestead and citrus grove from the early 1900s. This site provides an opportunity to host events that can attract tourists and residents. The site also provides an opportunity to link the agricultural sector to tourism by developing a farm to table venue. 7. Culinary Accelerator Expansion — Located within the Immokalee Regional Airport is The Florida Culinary Accelerator @ Immokalee, providing a state-of-the-art commercial kitchen open to a membership base. Depending on the membership level, members may select from a range of customized hours and plans to prepare, cook, and package their culinary creations for distribution. The culinary accelerator's goal is to support area chefs, farmers, and small food businesses to achieve their dreams of growing their food businesses and entering the competitive retail marketplace. One of the challenges that chefs, famers, and small food business face is finding a suitable space for start- up businesses once they reach capacity at the accelerator. There is opportunity to expand this successful facility or expand services to address the next level of business expansion. 8. First Street Corridor — Main entrance into Immokalee from coastal Collier, the roadway provides an opportunity to create an entrance into the community and to partner with the landowners along the street to provide needed commercial, residential, and recreational opportunities. The entrance to the ICRA is an opportunity for gateway branding. Additionally, there is an opportunity to connect Immokalee to surrounding areas within and beyond Collier County with the Paradise Coast Trail (PCT). The PCT is a Shared -Use Non -motorized (SUN) Trail. 9. Main Street — At the center of Immokalee, Main Street is a State roadway that has recently been improved for pedestrian access in 2021. A future "loop road" may eliminate the freight traffic that currently hinders the corridor from being designed and treated like a pedestrian oriented downtown 4-30 corridor, and this could open the door for a transformation that allows more outdoor dining and neighborhood retail. Main Street also has opportunities as a central focal point for community branding efforts. 10. Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative — As outlined in Objective 4.2.3.2, this initiative focuses on creating a wholistic approach to neighborhood revitalization by including strategies for infrastructure, housing, and safety improvements. There are 12 neighborhoods identified on the Neighborhood Map (Exhibit A). Two areas have emerged as opportunities based on current or budgeted public investment and partners: Eden Park and South Immokalee. Each neighborhood will have unique constraints and opportunities. Initiatives for South Immokalee will include Dreamland Park improvements. In addition to this opportunity, improvements to park amenities throughout the community's neighborhoods will be pursued through public private partnerships to create a comprehensive park network to be implemented as funds are available. The Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative also addresses housing needs through identifying and pursuing replacement, renovation, and new construction opportunities. Community Policing and Code Enforcement may also be identified within the strategic revitalization plan for each neighborhood. 11. Immokalee Regional Airport — The Airport provides a strategic location for manufacturing and distribution. Through coordination with the Collier County Airport Authority, the CRA has an opportunity to advance economic development goals through marketing the available land, considering the creation of a "shovel ready" site, and supporting the improvement of infrastructure at the Airport. In addition to those opportunities identified on the Framework Map, the CRA will also leverage resources and funds to further projects and plans led by other agencies and organizations, including: - Cultural Trail Opportunity - Affordable Housing Opportunities - Housing Replacement and Rehabilitation - School Board Coordination/Education and Training Expansion - Stormwater Master Plan - Sidewalk Master Plan - Recreational Expansion Projects and Programs Florida Statutes Sections 163.362(9) and (10) require that CRA Plans contain a detailed statement of the projected costs of the redevelopment projects and a time certain for completing redevelopment financed by increment revenues. Figure 4-4 below is a list of CRA capital projects and programs anticipated within the ICRA and associated timeframes (short-term, mid to long-term, and ongoing). It is anticipated that these projects and programs may utilize Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funding and other potential funding sources are also listed which may offset some of the projected costs. Short-term projects are primarily those that are currently underway and moving toward completion. For the mid to long-term projects, the CRA efforts will focus on positioning these projects for grants, 4-31 appropriations, and other funding opportunities. The recently approved Federal Infrastructure Bill (the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) is one such potential funding stream. For projects and programs with known or estimated costs, those costs are listed in Figure 4-4 below, and those that are partially funded in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 ICRA Capital Budget are noted with an asterisk. For projects or programs that are still preliminary in concept, the costs are indicated as "to be determined" (TBD), subject to more detailed planning, design, and coordination with other agencies. The proposed projects and programs identified in Figure 4-4 provide general guidance based on public input on project priorities to implement the overall vision of Immokalee. The Redevelopment Plan also allows for flexibility to move into mid-term and long-term projects if funding and partnerships are identified with private sector, non-profit entities, or other government agencies. The majority of the items identified will require assistance from additional funding sources including the MSTU when applicable and grant funds as well as partnering with other governmental agencies, non-profit entities, and County Departments. It is assumed that projects and programs will be further defined and articulated during the five year updates of this Redevelopment Plan. 4-32 Figure 4-4 - Capital Projects & Programs Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is proposed to assist with financing the following projects and programs. Projects/Programs Anticipated Other Potential Timeframe Costs Funding Sources Grants, Non-profit Cultural Center $3,740,000** entities, other Mid/Long-Term government agencies Public Art Cultural Trail TBD MSTU, Grants, other Mid/Long-Term government agencies Grants, Private Sector, Land Acquisition TBD other government On -going agencies Shovel Ready Program TBD Grants, Private Sector On -going Grants, Non-profit Branding and Marketing TBD entities, other On -going government agencies Grants, Private Sector, Site Improvements TBD other government On -going agencies TIF Incentive Program TBD N/A On -going Grants, Private Sector, Industrial Park Development TBD other government On -going agencies Airport Economic Grants, Private Sector, Short -Term & Opportunity $5,210,000** other government Mid/Long-Term agencies Culinary Accelerator Grants, Private Sector, Short -Term & Expansion TBD other government Mid/Long-Term agencies Airport Park Recreational Grants, other Short -Term & Opportunity TBD government agencies Mid/Long-Term Retail Incentive Program TBD Grants, Private Sector On -going Grants, Private Sector, Short -Term & Main Street Initiative TBD other government Mid/Long-Term agencies Commercial Improvement $100,000 Grants, Private Sector On -going Grants Business Expansion and Grants, Private Sector, TBD other government On -going Retention agencies Grants, Private Sector, Broadband Initiatives TBD other government On -going agencies 4-33 Projects/Programs Anticipated Other Potential Timeframe Costs Funding Sources Grants, Private Sector, Land Acquisition TBD Non-profit entities, On -going other government agencies Grants, Private Sector, Infrastructure Non-profit entities, Improvements TBD other government On -going agencies Grants, Private Sector, Mobile Home Replacement Non-profit entities, Initiative TBD other government On -going agencies Grants, Private Sector, Housing Renovation Non-profit entities, Incentives TBD other government On -going agencies Grants, Private Sector, Non-profit entities, New Construction Incentives TBD other government On -going agencies Neighborhood Revitalization $183,600 Grants On -going Initiative Costs for lighting, street trees, benches, waste receptables, bike racks, signage (both sides of street) • South Immokalee $1500000** MSTU Grants other Short -Term Planning/Design ,, government agencies • South Immokalee $9900000** ,, MSTU, Grants, other Long -Term Construction government agencies • Eden Park $1500000** MSTU, Grants, other Short -Term Planning/Design ,, government agencies • Eden Park $9900000** ,, MSTU, Grants, other Long -Term Construction government agencies Enhanced Public Safety TBD MSTU, Grants, other On -going government agencies Grants, other Community Policing TBD On -going government agencies Community Land Trust - special needs housing Grants, Private Sector, TBD Non-profit entities, other government agencies On -going 4-34 Projects/Programs Anticipated Other Potential Timeframe Costs Funding Sources Immokalee Sidewalk Master Plan Cost for upgrades to have sidewalks on both sides of streets with drainage and utility improvements Focus Area 2 - South Immokalee Sidewalk Plan • Delaware Ave & $1115000* ,, MSTU, Grants, other Short -Term Eustis Ave government agencies • Other Focus Area 2 $11560000** ,, MSTU Grants other Mid/Long-Term gaps government agencies Focus Area 1— Lake Trafford Road Area • All Focus Area 1 $18,810,000** MSTU, Grants, other Mid/Long-Term government agencies Outside Focus Areas $6,525,000** MSTU, Grants, other Mid/Long-Term government agencies Stormwater $278,000* MSTU, Grants, other On -going government agencies General Public Road MSTU, Grants, other TBD On -going Improvements government agencies Grants, other Land Acquisition TBD On -going government agencies MSTU, Grants, Private Waste Management TBD Sector, other On -going Initiatives Rovernment aeencies Park Amenities Zocalo Dreamland Land Acquisition Transit Amenities Streetscape Improvements Main Steet Streetscape MSTU, Grants, Private $70,000* Sector, other On -going government agencies MSTU, Grants, Private TBD Sector, other Short -Term government agencies MSTU, Grants, Private TBD Sector, other Short -Term government agencies Grants, Private Sector, TBD other government Mid/Long-Term agencies TBD MSTU, Grants, other On -going government agencies g g TBD MSTU, Grants, other On -going government agencies g g MSTU Grants other $1,500,000** Short -Term government agencies 4-35 Projects/Programs Anticipated Costs Other Potential Funding Sources Timeframe First Street Corridor $250,000* MSTU, Grants, other Short -Term government agencies Lake Trafford Road Corridor TBD MSTU, Grants, other Short -Term & government agencies Mid/Long-Term New Market Road Corridor TBD MSTU, Grants, other Mid/Long-Term government agencies On -demand Transit Service TBD Grants, other Mid/Long-Term government agencies Pedestrian Safety MSTU, Grants, other Improvements TBD government agencies On -going * Partially funded in the FY 2021-22 ICRA Capital Budget ** Costs are conceptual only, final costs and projects to be determined per the outcomes of the planning efforts. In addition to capital projects, the Redevelopment Plan includes several non -capital projects and programs. These on -going soft costs provide for the operations and administration of the CRA offices, as well as implementation of the Goal to "Create a Cultural Destination" through branding and marketing, public art, and special events. It is anticipated that administration of the CRA will continue to be financed through TIF funding allocations while non -capital initiatives to support Cultivating Culture may be funded through a combination of TIF funds, grant sources, and/or partnerships with private sector, non-profit entities, or other government agencies. Additional redevelopment opportunities in the area may arise in conjunction with capital projects planned and administered by other agencies and organizations. The CRA should seek to enhance or augment these efforts through coordination and partnerships when initiatives support the goals and objects of the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan. In accordance with §163.362(4), Florida Statutes, any publicly funded capital projects to be undertaken within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area as of 2022 are listed in Exhibit R. The Redevelopment Plan also recognizes and allows for partnerships with other County Departments to facilitate the implementation of projects included in the Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) that may be eligible for Tax Increment Funding, as permitted by Florida Statue. 4.4.2 Funding Strategies In order to facilitate redevelopment in the Immokalee Redevelopment Area, the County will need to use various sources of funding from local, state, and federal government and the private sector. This section examines funding methods and strategies to finance redevelopment activities that will implement the Redevelopment Plan, including TIF, Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTUs), grants, coordination and partnerships, and other funding mechanisms. Funds deposited into the Redevelopment Trust Fund may be expended only in the redevelopment area pursuant to the adopted Redevelopment Plan and in conformance with the requirements of Section 163.387(6), Florida Statutes. Certain incentives may need to be offered to developers to attract new development, redevelopment, and rehabilitation of existing buildings within the ICRA. Some of these programs may include: 4-36 • Tax increment rebates • Rent subsidies • Loan or grant programs • Tenant improvement subsidies • Land assembly assistance and acquisition of easements • Impact fee waivers or credits This Redevelopment Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects listed. It provides a guide and list of both capital and non -capital projects that require approval by the CRA and/or the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) depending on the funding source. The Local Redevelopment Advisory Board will also review projects and make recommendations to the CRA Board for consideration. The CRA will follow the standard operating and procurement guidelines adopted by the BCC for all expenditures. The CRA will follow Collier County standard operating procedures when partnering with other County Departments and will follow state and federal grant guidelines as required for other funding sources outside of TIF. Projects may require additional vetting and piloting to better understand technical feasibility, impacts, and broader County implementation priorities prior to approval for implementation. To this end, planned projects include technical feasibility studies and pilot projects. As a result, this capital and non -capital funding plan is subject to change as it is re-evaluated. Additionally, the Redevelopment Plan sets a framework based on current conditions but also allows for flexibility in the phasing of projects based on funding opportunities and community priorities identified in annual work plans and capital improvement project lists. Regarding maintenance costs, maintenance of standard capital improvements is anticipated to be provided and funded by relevant County agencies, while maintenance for capital improvements above and beyond County standards are anticipated to be funded by the CRA. For a full list of non-CRA budgeted capital projects within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Plan per Florida Statute, see Exhibit R. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) As detailed in Section 2.1 of the Collier County Redevelopment Plan, TIF is a primary mechanism for funding public improvements needed to support and encourage new development in the ICRA. TIF funds are generated within Community Redevelopment Areas by capping (or freezing) the property values at the assessed value for an established base year. Thereafter, any tax revenues generated due to increases in property values in excess of the base values are dedicated to fund improvements and activities within the redevelopment area. The generated revenue is known as tax increment financing or TIF and is used in the CRA to leverage its redevelopment efforts. This revenue source provides Collier County with a means to finance front-end costs that facilitate redevelopment of the area through the existence of the CRA, consistent with the Redevelopment Plan goals and objectives. The CRA is able to use county ad valorem tax revenues generated above the base -year amount (the increment) to apply to projects and initiatives identified in this Redevelopment Plan per Florida Statute. Figure 4-5 shows the amount of tax increment revenues received since Fiscal Year 2000. The recession in 2009 had a major impact on tax increment revenues through 2012; however, TIF revenues have steadily 4-37 increased each year since 2013. By the end of Fiscal Year 2022, it is anticipated that revenues will exceed $900,000. Figure 4-5 - Annual TIF Revenues, FY 2000 — FY 2021 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 0 600,000 Q 500,000 400,000 p 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 -i N m aLr) ko r, oo rn CD 1-1 ni cn v Un ko r, oo rn o -1 0 0 cc 0 0 0 0 01-1 1H-1 -11-1 1H-1 N N } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Fiscal Year � TIF Amount • • • • • • Linear (TIF Amount) The projected revenues through Fiscal Year 2052 based on a conservative growth scenario with a 3% assumed average annual growth rate yield a total of $62,082,900. Historically, the ICRA has experienced a 5.3% growth rate. A medium growth scenario that assumes a 5% average annual growth rate yields a total of $95,799,700 through Fiscal Year 2052. For more information on the 3% and 5% growth projections, see Exhibit S. All scenarios assume the millage rates remain constant throughout the span of the CRA. Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs) A Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) is a special taxing district and funding mechanism to make capital improvements to the community or provide additional services based on identified objectives. The MSTU provides an additional ad valorem tax for specific purposes to fund streetscape and right of way improvements (including right-of-way maintenance in the MSTU area). Since 2011, the CRA and the Immokalee MSTU have collaborated on several capital projects. CRA staff will continue to evaluate the opportunity to coordinate with the Immokalee MSTU to fund eligible projects proposed in this CRA plan. A conservative (3%) growth scenario yields $23,040,500 and a medium growth scenario (5%) yields $32,605,000 for the MSTU fund over the next 30 years (FY2052). For more information on the 3% and 5% growth rate projections, see Exhibit S. Note that the MSTU does not have a sunset date and will likely continue when the CRA established for Immokalee sunsets. Grant Opportunities Grant funding can benefit Plan implementation, especially in the short-term as capital project costs exceed projected tax increment revenues. Review of appropriate grant opportunities that meet the objectives within the Redevelopment Plan should be vetted through Collier County grant review process and brought to the BCC for consideration when the cost benefit is positive. Tax Increment revenues can be used as matching funds in grant applications when the grant project implements the redevelopment plan. There is currently an advantage in applying for some federal and state grant programs based on the rural character and economic need of the community. When grants are used to subsidize improvements to code required infrastructure such as building facades, landscaping, signage, parking and pedestrian 4-38 amenities, it not only improves the appearance of the property but may also serve as a catalyst for neighboring property owners to invest in their properties, further enhancing the aesthetic of the corridor while positively impacting the tax base. Coordination and Partnerships Many of the projects listed in Section 4.4.1 require the CRA to seek approval from and coordinate with other agencies and entities, which may include planning and process approval and/or coordination. Leveraging funds with other departments or agencies will be needed to implement projects especially in the short-term. Coordination also includes instances in which another agency or entity oversees a project or initiative directly with the CRA assisting with funding or public outreach. The projects identified in this 2022 Redevelopment Plan are suggestions to be further vetted prior to approval for implementation. This includes review and approval from relevant County staff and elected officials. Planning and implementation may also include broader coordination with other agencies. Examples include coordination with the Collier MPO to share local needs that might inform a state roadway improvement, as well as coordinating with other Collier County agencies on topics such as Land Development Code changes, park access, community safety, transit and transportation, and stormwater. The CRA also has opportunities to coordinate with the Lee and Hendry Counties on transportation planning and economic development initiatives. Coordination with Immokalee Water and Sewer District and Lee County Electric Cooperative (LCEC) will be important to ensure adequate infrastructure is available for housing and economic development initiatives. This type of coordination might involve design review for projects led by the CRA and setting up meetings coinciding with regular planning and project cycles prior to finalized design phases. Key planning cycles for coordination include the Transportation Improvement Program planning by the MPO and capital improvement planning for Collier County. When working with agencies to identify shared funding opportunities as a part of these planning and implementation processes, it is important to recognize existing funding commitments, as well as limitations on the use of funds. For example, road impact fees in Collier County must be used for capacity expansion, such as adding a new road or new lanes to an existing road. Aside from government agencies, the CRA may also have opportunities to partner with local entities such as private firms and non -profits to realize some of its strategies and projects, as well as seek private sponsorships. For a successful public/private partnership, the developer must understand and accept the goals of the ICRA while government has to recognize the return -on -investment requirements of the private sector. Examples include potentially partnering with FHERO, the Culinary Accelerator and/or the Chamber of Commerce to expand business opportunities in the community. Coordination and funding opportunities may also be identified as part of private development projects. Lastly, CRA staff should look for opportunities to coordinate with the MSTU operating in the area to implement capital improvements. Several projects identified in Figure 4-4 would be consistent with the mission of the MSTU including South Immokalee Sidewalk Project, First Street Corridor and Lake Trafford Streetlighting. Immokalee MSTU is projected to have approximately $23 million in total revenues over the next 30 years that can assist in implementing this plan. Note that the MSTU Advisory Board would need to approve any process or funding coordination. 4-39 Other Funding Mechanisms Other redevelopment funding opportunities may be available through loans, bonds, and federal or state programs that offer financing options. To make the most effective use of tax increment revenues, other funding sources should be sought as appropriate to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. Community Redevelopment Agencies have the ability to borrow money and accept advances from both public and private financial institutions, including the County, for any lawful purpose in connection with the redevelopment program. Funds deposited into the Redevelopment Trust Fund, including TIF, which are not otherwise obligated, may be used for repayment of such loans or advances. The CRA may issue redevelopment revenue bonds, notes or other obligations to finance community redevelopment projects when authorized to do so by the BCC and in accordance with §163.385, Florida Statues. As noted in Section 2.2 of the Collier County Redevelopment Plan, security for such bonds may be based upon the anticipated tax increment revenues and other such revenues as may be legally available. The program offers tax-exempt, low interest industrial revenue bond financing to qualified manufacturing and 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations through Florida Development Finance Corporation (FDFC). This program is designed to improve low-cost capital availability to Florida's growing and expanding businesses that qualify for tax exempt finance under IRS rules, to allow them to be more competitive in the global and domestic marketplace. As noted in Section 4.3, the Immokalee Community has several economic development incentive programs available to spur private sector investment into the community. The following designated Incentive Program Areas (see Exhibit K) in Immokalee provide opportunity for grant programs, technical assistance, tax incentives, and/or other economic development incentives: • Quality Opportunity Zone (QOZ) • Southwest Florida Promise Zone (SFPZ) • Rural Area of Economic Concern/South Central Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) and member of Florida Heartland Economic Region of Opportunity (FHERO) • Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) • Promise Zone In additional to the aforementioned incentives, a number of economic development resources are available through federal or state programs. The following are examples of other federal or state financing programs that may offer financial assistance for redevelopment efforts within CRAB throughout the state of Florida: • Community Contribution Tax Credit Program (Corporate Income Tax or Sales Tax Refund) • Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program (QTI) • Quick Response Training Program (QRT) • Economic Development Transportation Fund (Road Fund) • Capital Investment Tax Credit (CITC) • Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credit (VCTC) • Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund Grants (RLF) Brownfields Redevelopment Bonus Program 4-40 4.5 General Requirements This Redevelopment Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes, which authorizes the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRAB) by counties and municipalities on the basis of a finding of blight or slum conditions and the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. The legislation focuses primarily on the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies, the powers granted to them and specific criteria applicable to Community Redevelopment Plans. The Community Redevelopment Plan is a comprehensive document that provides the goals and implementation strategies to reduce the probability or elimination of slum and blight. It includes potential capital projects and programs considering different funding sources to accomplish redevelopment goals. The preparation of the Redevelopment Plan includes analysis of existing and future conditions and public involvement, as required by Florida Statutes. The Redevelopment Plan for the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area was originally adopted in 2000 (Resolution 2000-181). In 2019, the BCC adopted an amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan to update the map for the Immokalee area (Resolution 2019-75). The 2022 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan is an update to reflect a revised vision and approach to redevelopment of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, building on the recently amended Immokalee Area Master Plan in December 2019. Section 4.3 of this Plan explains the update process including data, analysis, and public engagement (see Exhibit E for a summary of input received). Florida Statutes require redevelopment plans to be consistent with the local jurisdiction comprehensive plan, which is referred to as the Growth Management Plan in Collier County. See Section 4.5.2 below for an explanation of this Plan's consistency with the GMP. 4.5.1 Overview of Relevant Statutes Figure 4-6 provides an overview of the requirements for community redevelopment plans per Florida Statute and the location in this Redevelopment Plan where the relevant information can be found to satisfy these requirements. Figure 4-6 —CRA Plan Consistency with Section 163.362, F.S. Requirements Redevelopment JL. Section 163.362, F.S. Requirements Relevant Legal description of CRA area boundaries - Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan and reason behind establishing such Appendix A: Ordinance No. 2000-42, Resolution 2000- boundaries 82, Resolution 2004-179, Resolution 2004-384, Resolution No. 2019-75 Approximate amount of open space to be provided Street layout and property intended for streets - Objective 4.2.4.5 - Exhibit C Parks and Open Space Opportunities Map - Objective 4.2.4.2 - Objective 4.2.4.3 - Objective 4.2.4.6 - Exhibit J Regional Transportation Map - Exhibit T Street Layout Map 4-41 Limitations on the type, size, height, number, and proposed use of buildings The approximate number of dwelling units Section 4.5.2 Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan - Section 4.5.5 Land Use, Densities, & Building Requirements - Exhibit G Zoning Districts and Overlays Map - Exhibit H Future Land Use Map - Section 4.3 Background and Baseline Data - Exhibit F Residential Dwelling Units Exhibit - Goal 4.3.4 Infrastructure Property intended for use as public parks, - Section 4.4.1 Action Plan recreation areas, streets, public utilities, and - Exhibit B Sidewalk Master Plan public improvements of any nature - Exhibit C Parks and Open Space Opportunities Map - Exhibit Q Framework Map Neighborhood impact element describing - Goal 4.2.3 Housing - Goal 4.3.4 Infrastructure impact to residents in terms of relocation, - Section 4.5.6 Neighborhood Impact traffic circulation, environmental quality, - Exhibit A Neighborhood Map availability of community facilities and - Exhibit B Sidewalk Master Plan services, effect on school population, and - Exhibit C Parks and Open Space Opportunities Map other matters affecting the physical and - Exhibit Q Framework Map social quality of the neighborhood - Exhibit T - Street Layout Map - Section 6 Relocation Procedures _ Publicly funded capital improvements to be - Section 4.4.1 Action Plan undertaken in the CRA area - Section 4.4.1 Funding Strategies - Exhibit R Non-CRA Projects within the ICRA Safeguards, controls, restrictions/covenants - Section 4.5.7 Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & to ensure implementation of the plan Assurances - Section 4.5.6 Neighborhood Impact Assurances there will be replacement - Section 4.5.7 Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & housing for relocation of persons temporary Assurances or permanently displaced - Objective 4.2.3.1 - Section 6 Relocation Procedures Provide element of residential use, including any intent to remedy housing affordability - -Housing ' Section 4.4.1 Action Plan Projected costs of redevelopment - Section 4.4.1 Funding Strategies - Exhibit R Non-CRA Projects within the ICRA Redevelopment Area Plan duration and - Section 4.4.1 Action Plan time certain for redevelopment financed by - Section 4.4.1 Funding Strategies increment revenues - Exhibit R Non-CRA Projects within 4-42 4.5.2 Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan The Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) is the local government comprehensive plan, providing goals, objectives and policies to direct future land uses and allowable density and intensity of appropriate uses for future development. The GMP was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in 1989 and has been amended several times since the original adoption. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the GMP and specifically the Immokalee Area Master Plan per Florida Statute, which is recognized in Policy 4.3 of the Future Land Use (FLU) Element of the GMP as a detailed planning effort to "improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design" (Objective 4). The Immokalee Urban Area delineated in the Immokalee Area Master Plan constitutes much of the Redevelopment Area, however the Redevelopment Area is larger and also encompasses Rural Land Stewardship Area/Agricultural designated lands outside the Urban Area. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan is consistent with FLU Policy 4.8 which establishes that redevelopment plans may be adopted. Policy 4.8: The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners... The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000... With the exception that the Seminole Reservation comprising approximately 600 acres that is not controlled or regulated by the Collier County GMP, the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area is governed by the GMP and subsequently the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The goals, objectives, and strategies herein are consistent with the GMP. Figure 4-7 below includes Redevelopment Plan references that align with and further the seven priorities of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (December 2019). 4-43 Figure 4-7 — CRA Plan Consistency with the Immokalee Area Master Plan Economic Development Goal 4.2.2 Economic Development Goal 4.2.3 Housing Quality Neighborhoods Section 4.4.1 Action Plan - Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative Exhibit A Neighborhood Map Infrastructure & Public Goal 4.2.4 Infrastructure Exhibit B Sidewalk Master Plan Services Exhibit C Parks and Open Space Opportunities Map Parks &Recreation Exhibit J Regional Transportation Map Transportation Exhibit T Street Layout Map Goal 4.2.2 Economic Development Natural Resources & Exhibit Q Framework Map Ecotourism Section 4.4.1 Action Plan - Pepper Ranch Recreational and Eco-Tourism Goal 4.2.1 Celebrating Culture Goal 4.2.2 Economic Development Land Uses Goal 4.2.3 Housing Goal 4.2.4 Infrastructure Goal 4.2.5 Implementation/Administration Section 4.4.1 Action Plan Goal 4.2.1 Celebrating Culture Goal 4.2.2 Economic Development Urban Form Goal 4.2.3 Housing Goal 4.2.4 Infrastructure Goal 4.2.5 Implementation/Administration Section 4.4.1 Action Plan Goal 4.2.1 Celebrating Culture Interlocal & Goal 4.2.2 Economic Development Intergovernmental Goal 4.2.3 Housing Coordination Goal 4.2.4 Infrastructure Goal 4.2.5 Implementation/Administration Section 4.4.2 Funding Strategies 4.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/Clearance & Improvements In the future, the Community Redevelopment Agency may choose to pursue a program of property acquisition and/or consolidation to realize the redevelopment objectives. These objectives might relate to facilitating the elimination or prevention of blight and providing identified public uses. If a property is designated for acquisition, the process must comply with County requirements and/or State statutes. The Community Redevelopment Agency is authorized to demolish, clear, or move buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property acquired in the redevelopment project area, subject to 4-44 obtaining necessary permits. The CRA may partner with other agencies to assist in demolition of unsafe structures as authorized and approved by the BCC. The CRA may also engage in or assist in site preparation improvements on properties it already owns or properties it acquires in the future to facilitate development. Other improvements include general infrastructure and streetscape improvements that indirectly support development. All of these improvements are subject to obtaining necessary permits. 4.5.4 Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes No Land Development Code or Growth Management Plan changes are being adopted with the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan. Consequently, the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan is intended to maintain consistency with the land uses, densities, and building requirements provided in the Growth Management Plan and the LDC. For an explanation of those requirement see Section 4.5.5 below and for an explanation of the Redevelopment Plan's Consistency with the Growth Management Plan, see Section 4.5.2. 4.5.5 Land Use, Densities, & Building Requirements The Collier County Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code (LDC) establish the policies and standards for land use and urban design, which have a direct impact on the built environment of the Redevelopment Area, with the exception that the Seminole Reservation comprising approximately 600 acres is not controlled or regulated by the Collier County Growth Management Plan or LDC. For all other property, building heights, setbacks, sizes, and other standards are regulated by the zoning districts and overlays per the LDC. The Immokalee Urban Area delineated in the Immokalee Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan constitutes much of the Redevelopment Area, however the Redevelopment Area is larger and also encompasses Rural Land Stewardship Area/Agricultural designated lands outside the Urban Area. Below are the land use designations within the Redevelopment Area per the Future Land Use (FLU) categories on the Immokalee Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map, as well as the County Future Land Use Map for land outside the urban designated area. R L n F C ►v A (i Immnlrnlaa Aran Mnctar Plnn rn*ura I nnrl [Ica ecreation Tourism :)w Residential Subdistrict 1.9% 37.6% ledium Residential Subdistrict 4.5% igh Residential Subdistrict 6.4% ommercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 4.5% idustrial Subdistrict 3.0% idustrial Mixed Use Subdistrict 3.6% nmokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict E!minole Reservation T'llier County Future Land Use o griculture/Rural Mixed Use District/RLSA ncluding Lake Trafford) 5.7% 2.4% 30.3% 4-45 Below are the zoning designations within the Redevelopment Area per the Collier County Zoning Atlas. Over 69% of the Redevelopment Area is currently within an Agricultural Zoning District. The zoning districts set the standards for building heights, site development standards, and specific uses. Residential Zoning Districts RSF-3 11.9% RSF-4 RSF-5 RSF-6 RMF-6 RMF-12 RMF-16 RPUD MH PUD VR RT Mixed Use MPUD 1.2% Commercial Zoning Districts C-1 2.1% C-3 C-4 C-5 CPUD Industrial Zoning Districts 1 2.4% Airport AOPUD 6.1% Agricultural Districts 69.3% E Civic and Institutional Zoning Districts 0.3% CF Lake Trafford - 6.5% The following Overlay Zoning districts are adopted to apply particular standards or relief from standards to target development results desired for specific geographic areas of the community: Main Street Overlay Subdistrict (MSOSD) Agribusiness Overlay Subdistrict (AOSD) Farm Market Overlay Subdistrict (FMOSD) Jefferson Avenue Commercial Overlay Subdistrict (JACOSD) State Road 29 Commercial Overlay Subdistrict (SR29COSD) Central Business Overlay Subdistrict Allowable densities (dwelling units per acre) vary from four (4) to twenty (20) dwelling units per acre as identified in the Immokalee Area Master Plan for the corresponding to Future Land Use designations listed below. 4-46 URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT Base Density: Four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. Maximum Density: Four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. Density Recreation Tourist Subdistrict bonuses do not apply in this subdistrict. Transient lodging is permitted at a maximum density of twenty-six (26) units per gross acre. Base Density: Four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. Low Residential Subdistrict Maximum Density: Eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre, inclusive of all density bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available density bonuses. Base Density: Six (6) dwellings units per gross acre. Medium Residential Subdistrict Maximum Density: Fourteen (14) dwelling units per gross acre, inclusive of all density bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available density bonuses. Base Density: Eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre. High Residential Subdistrict Maximum Density: Sixteen (16) dwelling units per gross acre, inclusive of all density bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available density bonuses. Base Density: Sixteen (16) dwelling units per gross acre. Maximum Density: Twenty (20) dwelling units per gross acre, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict inclusive of all density bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available density bonuses. Transient lodging is allowed at a maximum density of thirty-two (32) units per gross acre. 4.5.6 Neighborhood Impact The structure of the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to have a positive impact on housing and residential neighborhoods. The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the Redevelopment Plan concentrate on existing commercial and semi -industrial areas including the Immokalee Regional Airport/Industrial Park and other opportunities identified in the Framework Map (see Exhibit Q). Since the provision of supportive services to existing residents and ensuring maintenance of low- and moderate -income housing in the area are primary objectives of the plan, the overall impacts of the proposed redevelopment program are expected to be positive, with few negative impacts anticipated. The Redevelopment Plan also proposes a comprehensive approach to redevelopment through neighborhood initiatives identified in Objective 4.2.3.2 as required by §163.362(3), Florida Statues. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan identifies partnering with housing providers to create incentives for housing rehabilitation and replacement in Strategy 4 of Objective 4.2.3.1. Consistent with §163.362(7), Florida Statues, the 2022 Redevelopment Plan provides assurances of replacement housing for relocation of persons temporary or permanently displaced are established in Section 4.5.7, Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & Assurances. For relocation procedures refer to Section 6 of the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. 4-47 Proposed development is subject to the Collier County development review process to assess and mitigate for Level of Service impacts to public facilities, including roadways, schools, drainage, and utilities. Regarding environmental quality, water quality is a key consideration for stormwater management improvements. Water quality impacts can be evaluated through existing Collier County processes. 4.5.7 Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & Assurances Redevelopment activities identified in this Redevelopment Plan will not be initiated until they are found to be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and applicable land development regulations. For an explanation of the Redevelopment Plan's consistency with the Growth Management Plan, see Section 4.5.2. The Community Redevelopment Agency, working collaboratively with County agencies, may propose amendments to the Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Code, including design criteria, building heights, land coverage, setback requirements, special exceptions, traffic circulation, traffic access, and other development and design controls necessary for proper development of public and private projects. To leverage tax increment revenues, Collier County may consider non -ad valorem assessments. The imposition of special assessments for capital improvements and essential services is covered by well settled case law and specific statutory provisions authorizing collection of non -ad valorem assessments on the same bill as ad valorem taxes. Such provisions require extraordinary notice to all affected property owners. Issues concerning restrictions on any property acquired for community redevelopment purposes and then returned to use by the private sector will be addressed on a case -by -case basis to ensure all activities necessary to perpetuate the redevelopment initiative are advanced in a manner consistent with this Redevelopment Plan and any amendment to it. Such restrictions or controls would be expected in the form of covenants on any land sold or leased for private use as provided for in the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.380, F.S. To ensure that redevelopment will take place in conformance with the projects, objectives and strategies expressed in this Redevelopment Plan, the Community Redevelopment Agency will utilize the regulatory mechanisms used by the County to permit development and redevelopment within its jurisdiction. These mechanisms include but are not limited to the Growth Management Plan; the Land Development Code; adopted design guidelines; performance standards; and County -authorized development review, permitting, and approval processes and any other adopted codes, standards, and policies. 4-48 4.6 Exhibits A. Neighborhood Map B. Sidewalk Master Plan (Overall, Focus Area 1, & Focus Area 2) C. Parks & Open Space Map D. Funded & Unfunded Collier Area Transit (CAT) Stop Improvements E. Public Meeting Presentation & Focus Group Meeting Summaries F. Housing Types & Residential Dwelling Units G. Zoning Map H. Immokalee Future Land Use Map I. TIGER Grant 2017 Project Area Map J. Regional Transportation Map K. Immokalee Incentive Program Areas L. Immokalee Retail Demand Assessment M. Immokalee Regional Airport Master Plan Layout N. Immokalee Water and Sewer Service Map and Five Year CIP (2022-2026) O. Immokalee Fire Control District P. Collier County Public Schools Data Sheet Q. Framework Map R. Budgeted Capital Projects (Non-CRA) S. TIF & MSTU Revenue Projections with 3% and 5% Growth Rates T. Street Layout Map 4-49 Exhibit A Neighborhood Map THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK N N O N E' U � c U b i o f6 r E o O r n a« Q t4 �' E Y E u o - o EIa Jv w (Dm2o u �i i � USUm 04 Ltii — c � U � aUm mU and o G fA N n o o w aooa ti Y >L C o¢ �w m< N zm (A!Q N C o _� - oU N-o m m N oEo, o0o r �aww z0� z D mE z a w N m O O g w bl 21,-D is HIS s �r �; w ,ti 4 4 a w a ¢ z O z < m O 0O O� ❑ W •��. IS H16N -� 1S I6S— d' _ •U w W o wl 1S HDN U' N 6z as 1S His\ N O _ LU rr_is H1i3tN 0 M o N Y w a w m�a ybca w 0 , Ea o Q W k ♦ - o � � '4 a a� OE = U U '-94- y _ "lVM 30NVI0 Q = a2 3nOV31 21 1 WVHI JIW ._ Y D 21312101�V1' a - ° u go J HC 3210HS 3NV1 a �' o LL J m w a m - -.EO w � m _W a E m m m = o c _a m i a c m U F o a 0 Q 9 a E 9 E m E \/ C E¢ U O W W 2 in f H w J �111111111111® `JtlW.,een Wd9Z:U4:ew1 IZN19=:-1-0 pxwdeyypoogioggbl-Nlelryaplsaa Ll-" lZ6lZO\SIDOIV\L00-L90EOZOZ\OZOZ4M THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit B Sidewalk Master Plan (Overall, Focus Area 1, & Focus Area 2) THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK U• 1 s Pr o } o 0 a `W' W o z zF U W UW ng�< Km ~ N • r N-9 . �WZ�Zry « C7 wQOHOvoLLj wm^� U 0, 'woLLycmmx,, w W 1S 1SL oLor wz o zo � is His N uJa J I— o LJJ 1S H 6 S ¢ -K 1 �y n W v w3 Z I� 11V// 1 H151 W o: w ca � O LFIIfY�FJ'J� MI NOS?JVO .. uC T N x ^ a m ^� O 0 a o u w = oNE N°' N t/ E « = E _ m l.VM 3ONVI9317 a 3n OV3l TLLIl m o „m dE mown m Eao d �.�2ag aN on tym K Lim_ W W ) - n y vm mt dm mr v t 4 Z UNN '"E Oa �Qc Eyck_ M o 3 3 m ii tt ro ny�'=EE o& s -010 v c am��3i�aE - - - E v E m m- m CO Y i�a�9 � N o _ N N w aH- 'O o o I L o C7 `0 E - W E a m a u a F K E x "a= v r I U I I I I I = o w 2 2- z° � ci JVW:...N yyd 9V694:aw11 LZOZ/£Z/6:-I-O P—SMUMOP!S LML 2LZ60\UQ!4x3 NIUMOP!S\SIE)DJVVOO-L90£OZOZ\OZOZ\:M owl / Ob u011110 �1,. t- -� 1S ooullp �1S 4106 N y h..1 •-,+, = w ` C7 � i 1p a!I,e4p a aO� _ O cC S ¢ 4 1S UR N ¢ ,� @i 16{ m E' 1S elO1Pel`J d g o c�7 cC UO - 3AV P!4o10 U 1 a ¢ 3 W o 1S e!Dasu!od .� C V 'oo 1S UIS L N m 0 L ame a 1S I l E > L r m > ¢ > > ¢ Q W 1S valS°W z U U w rn v Z 1S au!d c � .a 1S L6 NN 'Y � N Q9, o m m� ° LL`=.Nv LU U- Wzm x N ? 1S U181N 11 Ooa wzzxli 1S 418 L N w J s ¢ 6th Avenue CIR r z V y xa LL w x w Crews CT h uJ O d. ? N31 U18LN w O = U n, w w 1S 4161,N w 154161.N ° o N 19th TER Q 1S wel U J NI snl!1 U o z _ ystal LN 15 ,aAe8 U 1S sllaM - 1--I �r 10 asm0 ant ST _ Y Nl A0!1S 6u1118M o - Nl o5w'd NI esl!O to c W w W uap�eM a. 1S a ua�p Nl ¢ m° I--1 t e of lg apolyy �e E LV . Z .-'�..• - 1S auua uel o. alp a�!eT uap�ecj ¢LU 2i0 -led AVM euueuen 1S 4aead l w 1S lead K 0 --old - y lS ualp,awwnSIS 1S ,olA y r� `LSd '� ¢ osed 13 71 �, V 2J0 ISO-l?Jl �D 1..i 1S opeoonv a v - 1S 416Z N �2i0 aale>lowwl Od uos,ep o P, 2-' pK U U N1611ag J � EI 1� Roy rAY L,U \ \\\\ p ac O Nl gsuN U NT uoueW z U w - vJ - d cps y O 45 N-1 Aa14sV 3 o °- w - °' ~ �� Z E O J a J H(] poomxoB )a -` n= - � Nl s 4aanw d c�Hm_ E-aEcd NJ sewo4l AVM a°ead _a AVM APaUll bM eauawy qvM aoue!6911V Patriot CT mN`n U 4 emu 10 uos!peW �� \,D .,, Oa m E a � a to ..2 �oDa: ny -,D � � 2_i w a4�aA t7 d m' W � m O E H x W 6 J U�rvt'�`E 0- SZaEEM-Has 5 _ iao zo ayx ci�o d� o E m m y E W s U3d cc99=N LL ` O v E C z° ci u a a F rc mwLLEuDin u xcx V .w �aom `JVIN:.asn INd 96:ZE:l:awl IZ0Z/EZ/6:a1e0 pxw l ewVsnooj shlemaplS Llxll 1Zl,Z60\11914x3 hlemaplS\SleojV\L00-L90EOZOZ\OZOZ4M , yI 4rFL Airport RD t 1S y{2; 3S 1S 419 L iJ31 sHaaM f 3S 1S 41S6 3 CRJ Pa JeW ON 1S 4yt�- 3S 1S 4141 36 43E1 3AV uosyagap 3S 1S 91Z L 3S 1S 41L1 L 210 awo �� -{ � e� ' '. O loo4oS a '.';.�. � ¢ ¢ 1S sauop w w ... I r - o 1 02I 4oue `� ' it 41no� E 1S PuZ00, o" 1S is 6 N w I 1S 14 S au Qp a` 1S PuZN 1S puZS — w F t F J Z J —pc Q �' V) 1S PEE N is S 3 Lie 1S 4117N 1S 41bS1S 419N°` J w15.419S j F m O r 1S 419N -°a 1S 419S ! `o w d � or J oQ > 210 al eW - t � _U 10 M9S o is 41L N 1S 41L S Zj g S 81h ST 1S 41L S a � Z w n a - 1S 418N ~ _ Z is418S ••�',• 1S 416 N 4 1S 476 S Jump S oR 10 W U Z z.,Q ZW z��rc�m oc�m 90Z.d,6w Lwz # ONwo rl >aw t; i w U rc 0 LD 0 �r I-- 1 L1J w. I cI z c' H LLJ ° o; mN`n U ❑ N C � V N p Z- -I' E" v1 � u- � mEagawrc - . LU ��U�ELL v U�cad. Yy W ' tee E E 2 -2_ - m U�Ns"E -0 ti`o 2' EEI.' E� i €n o o m x x 3 "3 a E. LL rc zUay 5EME- 3 3 2 E o y 1 — rc `aaa �N .L14 dEw N�a`m eyyy:—n Wd9£:Z44:aw!1 MZ/£Z/6:01a0 Pxw Zeaiysno°d Sll--P!S LV" lZLZ60\1!4!4x341ervsp!S\SI9°lML00-L90E0Z0Z\0Z0ZFM THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit C Parks & Open Space THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK O ♦ �1 w Am's K U r O z_ U /���+uu�0((\ iSiSIN �' 0 is isIS 'ZS �� 6�81y O j N z o Q ¢ Z 0 QU a O`rJ� r Q u~i W Qp� O O 3: m OU is Hi6 N 1S H M N is Hl ll N yO N 6Z 23S is H1Sl N d� ❑ isHi9I N K r ❑ w ¢w K w Y O z Q Z W ❑ Oa NMJV3 Oa NOSIdVO X O w � O r O vU AVM 30NVI03llV CH 3no,J Il 31iill O Or N _v oa a, E Z.�oF'irn¢JN E m UO��-ry U O d N m E 3 `v oma o'ma w U x E U a y Q m ID C m c°Eg"Em r cA y N N¢ N O ' ❑ O2 E2 rn 0� u Q yzd=a D �d,gA m zg m�`o�a' a U C oa=r. U oo No°r°`y'cv o JUNOEo o O Snd O `v E a w o ��aEmo �i U a ° o k ❑ BEd">LLv uyomwa� d 2•>ocE° w ti 2.2'; °'oo. z zW oyaU�y U rna�N a°3c,oaEEK --=.-9.,W goo O U U oxo ° 10 E zzoX'`�M'' o ci � `o d o o o zzm,m., 75 c E o (j poNw�`u °'�o�m��" oNd wo<. yI'w o EawUN mN=o z �a Z' l w O � w O Z `0, I-- o � W w L.1.1 Z W N v N E c E a 0 oN d J0 G E 'U �OOO�NOM°iN OOOOJ N NNN N Q 0 0 d N N d 0 0 0 0 �' 0 a a 0 ° a Ua9aa O m Ol an d ScS'a a � V (.)zzzz�' T, S >z° a W W J v a� xa a c aai I N w 41 T E 0 .m < o¢ ¢ d a Q z Y o EL) as . €o rc y E Y O �U(�Z O O) O.N J LY�pp O O) V1 J L J U cIV V N % W 2 Q L y T O rwa U& d T r ¢ a a o m w E D a U m n a Q m Q 'Q � �c O� E N x�- O T E C ti D N C 9 y r Eo O E d y c 0 N E d� O. M d N� CL O E t6 x= c d O O. T a r a O n N '.O-. V evn:--n WVSS:9v:l:--u IZOZ/9Z/Z:a7eO Pxwpa1epdN a°edguadppu-SHied Llxll IZEZZO\SI`J°IVUOO-L90EOZOZ\OZOZ4M THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit D Funded & Unfunded Collier Area Transit (CAT) Stop Improvements THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK \\} \2§\ E / ;) i) \ . : Ell d L) \ . § ��I !_± � ■ ■&;2a §Jk \ §k! A q ■ f!£ : � [ ¥ a \ N� # $ � o } Uj m ° a e Q > 2 — LD _ L.0 7ƒ, a!| !k) !§!]! ��§!2■!» 1P3 i��§§§■;J�|2)] \gsgs0000QJ|| _ _ m Wl iL ._r _ m__VO .m THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit E Public Meeting Presentation & Focus Group Meeting Summaries THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK W W E E d o U c c E � F AMR, dm w dw ow 4w moo, . 10, 4& 4& 40 1 4a 0& Z H w w LD H Z W t� .m LL O N O N U a--j N E _O N N .0 E O O LU a) O E O L N m LL E E U O Q A A Ln .7 D O O Q E Ln O O LU 4-j O E O L li c� z H w LU Z H Z W W W J fc Y =� o $$ :Eu -u B p - 3 1S HAS -saa. �aai�nee t�.� qua ■■ ww< a qq a 8Y � J �F m �r N� �o aL a 30. L� N u bA 4-1 N � � v � v 4-J � u a� ca 4-1 V) � o E _ E O o W � _ v � Ln .a 4- 4— r6 O O O Z .Q c Q m L � Q u i > Ln D 0j o O ii O in _4-J Lr) N L > :3 V o o u o Cm S Y 4-1 m v ro 091 Q O Q u O V) u c� Z W W z H Z W Irn1 fl fb2. s C � A 2 C �c N G N µ C Q' aS � z �S J �\ O •� UVIA V •/ `V V I T l 1� ' v O N O O N ,^ V 1 ^ V� O O A 0 aA�^ �, .- 0 �/ • A 1 tJA,J u Ln hO� a W � N In U m _ a1 In N N N 4-1 4- O IM N •N Ln O o � NO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W c� z H w w Z H Z LU AW W L 4-0 L 0 0 :- j (6 U Q N L Q) L � O C- 0 4--+ D O v 06 L E o v U) CL 76N v V) O - v c 0 4- > 0 � _0 U) v � 0 N E+-j O ° o +-j v �, O � � o �'0 om V W 0 0 ° m V) 0 u 0 W W c� z H w w Z H Z W i i V i Oa 4-2 E 0 a > ._ r..+ _ i L Q i CL (A L L � � L CL H o 0 Ul i--j C- E O4 Q 'L O E O c - m L L O N ELn O u V) O { O O o u 0 — v :- J N v o N o E N v •V O ♦, Z N u v u L °V,' Vn N O o N N 7 a, 0 O ap _ o o L/) u u O _ ro x Lu Q o N o m O O 00 r-I LL 0 0 0 W W c� z H w w Z H Z W \� O E N N Q C) Q O � OcL N0 @j (A U 0 H V) Q. a--j X z c� z H w w Z H Z W W W J fc Y =� : nc -u Redevelopment Plan — Culture/Recreation 4-13-2021 A. Culture 1.. Number of Haitian participants is not indicative of the population in Immokalee. 2. Latin American and Haitian Cultures should be celebrated 3. Approaching Churches might help get more community input 4. Funding murals in open spaces like Zocalo Park S. Using open spaces for a community garden 6. Supporting events 7. Having more colorful thing around town not just Main Street 8. Honoring NFL players from Immokalee — Immokalee has 5 NFL players B. Recreation 1. More shade — Parks working with Botanical Gardens — donation of trees coming 2. Maintenance at existing facility 3. New facilities — Not enough recreational spaces 4. Outdoor equipment 5. More participation at the PARAB meetings and more members from Immokalee on that board 6. Better soccer fields/additional fields 7. Pepper Ranch — extended hours? — Limited to activity because of panther mitigation area/Conservation Collier Redevelopment Plan — Housing/Mobility 4-20-2021 A. Housing 1. Teacher housing, they don't qualify for low income housing 2. More housing options (rental/ownership) for middle income housing 3. Lighting (Lake Trafford) — update existing, add more B. Mobility 1. Education —traffic lights, pedestrians, bicycle users, drivers 2. Outreach —getting the message out to everyone/language barrier 3. Face -To -Face outreach if possible Redevelopment Plan — Economic Development/Community Facilities 4-27-2021 A. Economic Development 1. Business Park — Commercial/Industrial Space (as a trial run to see if expansion is possible) 2. Work Force — Match incoming Commercial/Industry with work force 3. Retention incentives — Incentives for employers already in the area 4. Land Availability 5. Cultural Center 6. Coffee Shops -- Student areas 7. Business Maintenance — Store front upkeep 8. Higher paying jobs 9. Commercial Retail Shops 10. Business Support Services - Goodwill Micro Enterprise Program/Small Business Development 11. Entrepreneurial Services — Group of people to help get entrepreneurial started 12. Chamber of Commerce — Collaborate to help businesses in the community B. Community Facilities 1. Civic Center/Government offices Redevelopment Plan — Ecotourism/Agrotourism- Stormwater/Lake Trafford 5-06-2021 A. Ecotourism/Agrotourism 1. Reenactment -Museum 2. Branding — Activities to attract more outsiders 3. Lake Trafford/Pepper Ranch/Parks — Food sales (currently no place to purchase food, people would stay longer if there was a place to eat on the premises) 4. Museum —Green Space (picnic tables)/Food Trucks/Gathering place/expanded hours (area for people to be able to mingle/eat)- Botanical Garden 5. Collaboration with all entities/businesses when there is an event 6. Change Mindset — local people think there is nothing to do in Immokalee, change the mindset and show the local people (waitresses, fuel station workers, handy store workers, those that work in places where people will stop) how much there is to do here (hidden gems). 7. Farms — Restaurant on the farms — Agro experience — pick vegetables 8. Branding — Food — People will travel for food experiences (keep them with activities) 9. Marketing — Niche with Food/Food Truck Rally (Chamber needs to be involved) 10. Engaging Food ies/influencers — Latin Flo (huge on instagram, can do marketing for you if they attend your events) 11. Taco Tuesday --Taco cook -off, who has the best taco in town, once a month (Day of the Dead celebration), make sure restaurants spruce up to make their place looks good so people will want to come. B. Stormwater/Lake Trafford 1. Street by Street Analysis —Tertiary (third level) drainage systems Specify by Neighborhood Collaboration with other entities — coordinating to make sure drainage is addressed THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit F Housing Types & Residential Dwelling Units THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ,k a aiSlN Ir ems /\\\\ k ass a.aN < Ga _s « is * . 1,3 ` � ( � �§ ! ){ ) \ ){ k} \ 2 k§■2 �§ � $n Loo : 4 di E LD �r _ _a m \ LU § 2 & � 0 /\c U\/ ee\ -'4\ƒ &0 32u � . Lu � � !« , �{ƒ �fr $/(| IX 1gall ` __ _mmAft ._,"to _# __.mIIm____ THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit G Zoning Map THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK oc kD �g ( �� ! �i ; )! f § , ff E k l k / * k a � &R �® )� �3 | } 2[ %ciK !;§_ # %|■2;2/ R§`§Q— ! m! . 0 \ f2�� ! � ! � / LU u LU § 2 , LD 2 � §!■2;� ;23lwk � .zi �° rn.§. !§ ƒ\K ____,_._.._ Ewa .+___.__ THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit H Immokalee Future Land Use Map THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK .@ m k � & � o a m! �a a_N \ \a HIS e ` _maE sHiS m a is � § k ) U) __mt4_iZOU m 4ipo _nI+ � ra (� L L y THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit I TIGER Grant 2017 Project Area Map THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INSET I ShL i --FSU College of Medicine Isabel Collier Read ♦ Immokalee Health Park ♦ ♦_ ♦. .__. e) 0 Immokalee Pioneer Museum 29 w j I Seminole Casino Hotel Immokalee 846 12' ideal; 8' minimum in constrained area Seminole Tribe of Florida Immokalee Reservation ,� �♦ r Immokalee ip ♦ ♦♦ V �♦ ♦♦ �� 846 t ♦ (�♦♦ ♦♦ � Seminole ♦♦ Immokalee ♦♦ Administration _ M ��������■ Cent - Q rhlands - Two bus stops will also be provided nentary at Farmers Village. choo/ Family Care owl iTechImmokale V ' , ♦ (1 (Clinic) Technical �� Center (iTec�l�J ♦♦, ,� Collier County ♦♦`�;I~ Immokalee Health Dept. O r Immokalee High School Middle School Immokalee , Community Park ROBERTS Charter School & 0 To Farm Wo Redlands Christian Village Migrantr,4 floc. 0 (Employm( 29 F8461 CONTINUED... SEE INSET 1h 7, q THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit J Regional Transportation Map THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK aE .1 2E 42 E' z N m N ° N C .1 E N Sow as o 0 m aa m So o3a (7 _ -wc m05 owLL Of�gUN E Rva�co 'ram pmh p N N 2 S a �p= �� N O C I I @ ♦ \ (n N !_ / to �a 0 m 0 T 10 E O Y O -O Ir o m m m. O c a v E `c 1 w o 3 3 E_ - c � D _-0 6Z as 1 w��z J 1 fnpN 'L ° 0) , 1 s C�N 3 1 1 -0 1S 1Sl S --da-SIti9N �WU� -I J 1 < 7 w 1 N 6Z?JS 41S-H156=N 11 r1 N m N Z a I U 7 Z) LjjC y 2 Y 00 1 O U LLl y Li J QJ'rc> 1 `o dC 0- a) 4� u � oY M 1 0J „y Nz - 2ILL 0 . rn \ t Nv \` O \\CL> h E 0 U \♦ m o ♦ N o'a W c Q U a t a _ of R e E a IL v c e y CO G Z 2 a t J2 U 2 C f v < J ap w E E rc¢ U O S w K m x a m o W E E E E E • , J I�1� V I I / Ewvu—n Wtl SE:bS:Z:awl IZOZ/9Z/Z:-wa pxw'deyyuol.4j.d... iyleuoi6ay LV" lZIIZO\SI`JuN'IL00-L90EOZOZ\OZOZ\:M U z�XK�M� ONm�NMN w � Opyw # o'awz0 }a�w O � 0 W L THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit K Immokalee Incentive Program Areas THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MEN p1 li - W N M Q 1S is 6 S 00 N M M Q OER N N 6Z 21S 1S HISLN- � a V O L 1L7 DD N N P��� OD • y N a)N N � W �S.CO a QV W i � oD O _ M M O ■.■ N N M Z N N U ..., w W Z � N N N M N W Q IDM y. N LO O i O ' N O N f� m M F N N N M i i T N N m i O tD O h N N M 117 co H m a a cai JS"ydO U O O` M M O .` j LL ca 0) O c m w - a.... levy ...... .....■ ...■ ... ..... u.....nY'Yn.Y Y. W W ¢ o aoi c m x m a r E o nl �20 O `o N Q c y O M. N d rL �4' N N LL 7 ? ¢ 0 V E E 0 E o ° a U £ a Li O / Ln w e..0911 00 co THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit L Immokalee Retail Demand Assessment THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I X 0 EUJ .2 un 1-4 ui E LLJ LLI _0 Lu LLI 4- r-4 LL to F- U H Z O U } W Y i . C -0 -0 C ON i (6 O O Q Xo O N O Ln O N � U O > a)4.., +., O Y L 5 Lm- L >V)+, O i E N N a)a, � U Q' U 5 -0 *C N O •L L U a O Q- � > W X (6 O C o � � O O +- i } L- (0 fti (0 Cl)Lf) -0 i L 00 -� — M O c -0 L X cli C a>EE`� N (n0 Q a--' +, 0 m > � —0 = O N U U C Cl) O U E ro 'N O O H 0- 0- O aJ .., O Y jC O o 0 O E E U Q E E t N L O +� aoai 0 V) � V) O O cR- E N .E w Q •— co L > O 4' O +' O > : L • j U a--� " o 0-0 o " � CL Q 41 O L O ww o 0 O 0-� O c 0 O O aj ai a) -0 0 v =— E O U m E u C 0 E w O O +J C O O +, O 4- w Y a' + a, Q L O E > 0 ai v a)v _ On =L C c O 0 L 4 E tCo two U O ca N a) a) a L C O � U O N 3 •L O L 0 0 O _0 4- O O D 0 VI M Ln O N UU av 0 o Q _0 U N EL E O _0 U C C O N O L !N C � � C N O O N Q C Ln N 0 vi 4-1 U C • • • • • O 4-1 O 4J v�i O (O i N > L EvO-o o.0 v 'v O -co 4 v C � (U3: N C (B N E _O '� L.L �..' .0 O O O 0 E �' o N U -o N X O 4-1 L Oan O C O C N O M N V O O E *Z- D E � O O > U C C O O i L L O Q 0 U O N - +- 0) +, Z Hip O >-�N O O Qj N 4-1 O U M O 4-N O O O ;_, ._ to N M Q C N O v O a)(U yx0T 0 W s Z N M L a,u Evv� v O O N O ca 4-1E 0 E Z c� N (AOu m O Qu a o U Z O a O Zz q) - ` a1 Qv 4- O O O U Q Q U � Z3 -(3 3 U 3 Ll oa'o-0 Q � v a � H ,O v � N - N +' Ln U } c c 3 v C v Q C > > 0 O C O N O C O `� O E E. m O i E' QJ =3 (3) C6 L D L O O O Q U-O N-O U v U a- 4- a) U m L >- N !E (0 j � 0 0 +J O C Q 0 -0 ns N O 0 -O 4 f6 C a, - -0 0 — o +, v +�N +' O Uo�0�0 •O O O +- •N U �-•� 0 C Q OJ V�1 N N L EL O (3) (A•L v L_ 4w C-0 L 4CL co N N C q0 o 0> o C tin a 0 0L•- C O C X o Ln M -0 c>a -0 o E Z O p v O U oN O 0 n a, o C U O c v U U O C E O a) L C Z D- 0- .� m L 0 O O aX, 0 0 0 U a v c7 NC4 0E0oo Z +� > i a % _ ~ v v C Y L aJ qA 0 "a 0 u two o m u E E� E N w CL m u to C J r_ a=+ N .X W D ma O N N", i GJ O u t O. m i to O E w 0 co .E O a O u W Q CL El N v � LL LL z � v � E O +_+ L N C6 C E c a--+ L O c O N E C '_^ Q �aoNLv c 0) >- CU vv � 7a v N - ca 5s YE_ o 4- Q -Ile f0 > U bn aJ 4-1 � O C � i N _ a) i C OU � Q cE a)f6 = -0 = 0 m aJ 0 L C N c a1 aJ O a) a) L N *' c m N 4- (O O Q _ m - c = L w Q% � = Ln L ++ N � a1 N Na , a a1 N c O +J aJ U _ (B L cu L N N O O a) N c O QJ (0 O ) O a., a) aJ N O O N v u > 4J O �_0 E f° N tB L O c to N N v N > (6 E O c a1 O aJ c O > (6 � U + ++ U c a Q 4 N 4, v o = 4- O � +J N 7 Q Q� 3 c O— -0 N Q ca +, QJ i s O � co c aJ O N N cn O U u bA O Lr)� o 0 L Ln 0 I +, +' 4-1 N L OJ c Q Q O O 0 0 �_ 6 — V 3 L a1 0 0 p Ln c L •p -0 c c o c C6 N > C +� aj > c cu •L 4- > fp >CL O -a N N _ a L b�A m L LZ c ca 4- cu U) (6 V1 U i, u O N O 0 a) c ,n .1 L.c O v Q } o ++ N (a i 4- M U (6 a) aJ t O `� O v Q y - 'V) \ O T 4J c O 4' O U\ o O i a1 N aJ ++ � a) ;} co U �_O Q N Lv Q>• W�� L(� ULr) > 0 N ,IN >` � OH a) bn. • bjO 4-1 m L aj L L . v a) 4• U oc 'L O L L (0 Y �O c +' 0 m i >- N M L- a C i c�i� +L L O L t .O Ln c •_ N 0 Q4-1 a) C ao o O— a CU f0 E cLo ++ i N > c c (0 N tw H N �- L LOIi a fa 0 `� x 0 0 Gi O U c v N _ - 4 J bb to V w— a1 N aJ . N o a L Y N L Q +1 U aJ v L aJ L v N c t O `� O CL 'a G7 +� N +� Q C �= > + O � L O a) L N N (U _ U >� ^y _ a) a --I C L L a) L C O c (C Q oO L v O (O c N+ L N 'N iO N � v 0 O (0 0 O Q aJ aJ ca N N L _ O x, Y .O (B Q a 3 Q ++ L N a1 C + co a1 N (0 v N L bA — M - > �F o V •- L Y i aJ O `� 0 U dA a� ELL Ln0 M '^ c p U L t O c v E � c O v U �_ m 4J (6 G1 N aJ O (6 — N v N O aJ Q N Nam. lD t } `� "6 0 +� L 4! co 4-i v N c N +�, •�C i m m 'L v : a) aJ 4- O L O a GJ QQ SaJ !E � � u- C L uu c c O N>, L-0 +' LnO4-0 N c Oi N;i GA 4-0 "> QW aJO 0 o n cz ; � ' vO w o acu C O • N j, � o Q.cLn Op_ � >UN - O �0 UO teN O Qi•a cu - c GJ f° L '�4-0 +� U aJ '^ > + cB a, m a) 4— a, i C6 c N m O H O N fp cu , -a u � c u U Ln tw v O N f4 41 3 cv > o H �, .m co aJ 0 .c o °J a v a) o m o w O s 0 Y E O O +' L 0 0 a� Y N O c v n3 N W N GJ aJ N r *,' +, A o O +, C Q C .� a1 4- O tw N N � w L u v - > > O i �b0 E N •� v cu Q fL0 +�, rn C c v O a, .i 4 N a, .N i .0 O Q ++ c aJ L 3 v M UA 0 , a0 LA bjD =3 O EY0 ` OEo 6 O 6 � 6r O i U. " m Y V) + U O O N Yv .GJ c u M v v G mO U > _j — U W O W0 - +J J Q ON w 4-+ OM N N L N 0 co U Q� J E o C o � IJ W L.L c aA z N v � � v c O � C6 CD � a E p o E N p N N Q Z o ° o _0 - _0 c D a1 f6 N L a) Q 4W O O +J O O =3 u O - "� by O i C H O p Q a o v v Lnki L aJ O _ u 3 O O c0 O p aa) -0 o (6 Ln C U U a Ln C) � Lnr4 Qa D Ln N C — 'n y1 } v U i O v *' - aJ C• X p a- Q a) L Q � `H L LnLZ ° o a o L O i O Ln N a N O 0- — v a _ an C6 H Y O L a) `�0 co � a o � a v an � a iE D H N o a) km cpi Q a v a L Q ° a) W O Ln Q H Z IA a, L 3 C x W cC Q a, Y cc U L N a ° 4 N O tw N C o !E o O Ln co i \ cc U- s v al ° E CL = O C O 'O o a (7 a Q bn L p L L � O L E N Li a > > t N O O -O c c o a V) N C _ U co O H t O O O ++ (0 C:) N L 00 •(/} O O O > C 2!- a �. a, �Un) O m ( N O a O 'x CL O C Q o a u v >- a L aJ CM Z C6 (6 O N = C: >. s U a Q} a D ° N U a 0 a � to c 3 = o o a, L -0 Qj N aJ O E N v Q c O U O i +0+ 0 0 0 c V) o ++ Q M E cB i N t O O NCO 0 O O N °� u N a QJ !E ° v L o O O a= n N O p = v U- v t v tin U v >. a 3 v a, 3 _` to aj v v C a (B U \ 41 N Q N L a Y C L ° E o `n a-+ D Ln ° Q o ° v v 4 � N v° M Laj v U V 4-J > a a ° YO 0) CU 0) p i E Q a v D E cn x ai c c� a E 3 Q t o t O C O H OA C' V � bA O 0i V m w C U GJ E i N x O a m LL m U— L r W m v Y � � L `9 O E E ibxi C6 E w m E .0- o O E L.L — GJ cn U H a > M p i U 1 +J 0 i v L 0 L 0 •_ O i., v c o V m al C a1 O L — � -0 � � C 4 `ti N ate-+ � U a-•+ a1 a1 U U a) _ Ln -0p aJ Q +� U aJ a)L i O i � n ` N O 'I--Q L L _ v a, +J �' a: _ ' . !:2 aQj 0- 0-0 3 > +� 4-N 4 `� +J Vi ax, o N bA '� c0 +, i U i ' U> L CU a1 E O v t ° o a C VI C N p a1 aJ 'a O � > C V a c0 O _ s E Ln N .E +� Q tn o E by a �, Q L> v v a)v i L (fin Q a••+ o a c0 p 4• 'v O > � O v' in ai a, i 2 0 U (O n O U1 i p 0 In a)m +1 4-1of � c ro c, 4-Ln a v O p E w s +, — E a, N ° f6 Vi v L � O +J a s a c _ a M Lnbn t '> o a> 'a a +J c ao a, ca ON a v N > N � C6 UA a) Lntp ,U L a1 _ a r O — o L a a > 1 > 0 c O a }�i O L +�,! +J Ln"z Q Ln U a) +' C •N O a--i O Q E dA _0 •M 4' L L C6 u O Q p E H L 0 4 o to �, C E av U E o v = a i a o E CL a)o m Q N a E -0 > L1 O Y N ° L 4 E OLn c ai LAco o p +- } aJ �, E v � E +J O u 0� °1 � Ln o 4-1 c _� v 4. a p c ._ cu 4-E ° E N i o �� o a v �' c°° 3 3> Q E E v °v)' a Q "' VI L °J E a = V1 ° o a, `n to C v c p C a 3 c u a� o E p +J o E �, L p +� bn c +' t 3 a' � c 40 -a v �_ i U N _ =3 p E O�-0 0-E v O O 0- V L V) w a) 3 S -0 Ln �abD• a.1 s oo a Q 'm 'n + �� 4- -r3 3 L X L i +, u v° v 4� -O s a, �&, � E Q o s v M a) N y y� o 3 o +, c tLn ^' Q v a v ca - .Q E i� N Q o C_ 3 Q �O G 4A b�0 Q L U O a a1 ++ s �n N O v — w.� c m _ > a Ln a U 0 3 3 .�ai L — C > a _ i U0 o 4- aJ � a1 Z `~ M t c cu 3 v N N i yQj U u 0 U E p >n3 ca o .L +� 4ts . o .E Z o a La-' > > > > > THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit M Immokalee Regional Airport Master Plan Layout THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit N Immokalee Water and Sewer Service Map and Five Year CIP (2022-2026) THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK cD n W Ol C Z a} m �a N Da N W Z w Z) O m oa 0 c w rn _ a 0 I..L W c 5Q L W ry uw U Q WN N rJ W J O Q m w O M o n N c Q C c U_ v/ N '0 v/ MA LU W Q 93 �- i u o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 e O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 008818 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 va000oo va0 »os�s0o 0000 0000 000o va000 0000000 000o voo 0 0 0 0 O O o O O O O O O O N O O O O O N O O O O O O O N 7 _0 N O O O vi �O 7 Vi vi Vi vt Vi --� v`. oc M ✓\ O O O vt Vt O\ 00 Vt O M �D O O V N e7 N O N VI �G N O O O 00 00 en 69 7 ti a, 7 �n H3 M N �O 00 7 69 V3 V3 N 49 N Hi N Vi Y3 69 V3 di 65 69 V3 V3 �„� V3 d9 V3 d N O O O d O O O O W O 69 O 69 ^✓' 69 w 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Div o 0 0 000 00000 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b9 N O vi O O O O O O O O O N V Vi M f3 O f3 O O O o0 00 69 �O H3 Vl v� V3 69 69 69 69 69 69 O O N O O d N O O O N O O O O O N O 0 O 0 O O O O O N O V O lO O O O O O O Y 'd M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O R O o O 0 0 0 O O O yb�9 N 0 0 C E O C O O C C O C C O vi O Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Pa O 7 VNt m s9 O_ 69 00 7 L = 'O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O R 0 0 0 O O O O d N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d 0 0 0 O O O O O O C o O C O O O O O o o O O O O O C O 0 0 O O O O O v3 O 69 V b O O O O O O O y 0 0 o O O O C O O O O V'i �O ^. N C 7 O O O O O O O O N O r O N N N Vt vi �O 7 Vt Vt Vt vi vi vt oo N 7 �O V1 \G 7 V'1 M l0 O\ M 69 N 69 Y 69 O 69 00 69 �O 7 69 V3 69 69 69 � Hi 69 V � O Vl � GQ U O N C cn 'ACA 'A CA 'A AAA s� azz a a s w ��-0-U U b cc A] x o m w Aw W b •R• u = .��+ it 44 4 Q � ICI is ti L Q 7 'O R 9 L- lA ��a a w w w w w w wR ❑❑ppOp O O Gp O O 9b 9b O O O O Op O O OqVj�FU U U U A U U U U A U U U O A U U A A U U U U A U U A U U O 3 O 3 O 3 O O O O O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 4 O 3 O 3 O 3O 3 O 3 O O p O O O O O 3 O O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O O 3 O 3 O O O O 40 333333 3333333 3333 333 3333 3333 333333 3333 �333 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 e v �o ro c c o 0 o c o 0 0 0 o c o o 0 0 0 o p p c c c o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o o 0 0 0 0 c c c o p 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E. 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O °p O C C C C C O 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s09 00 609 409 000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 6�9 409 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 o000 0000a^ v o v b y vioyo" q 0000 O �n lD rl C 01= W O N O 0 oeF O O ti o000000 O O N N `O 0"0 N N r � � O N 69 M 69 M O M~ 69 � b9 r r' V N l� V3 fA 69 69 69 M h M N 6A s9 O .-. N 7 T �p 69 69 s9 69 00 00 69 69 �D 69 fA V3 s9 fL 69 Vi 69 69 69 6N9 sills sN9 6Ni9 sbq 69 bc`Ov o0o o by 000 c a c 0 a �v� 0 0 o o0o p p o p o p N vj sv �n"'i o0o o0o c c 0 O N 4s 1p 69 N q pp bO 0 0 0 0 0 N O O c c C ypj p" s9 69 H3 O y rys � � 69 q 4�9 N 69 p w R O p 0 0 0 p O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O ta N p p 0 0 0 p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C N O O O p R 0 0 0 0 0 0 y O o o o O O O p 0 0 0 o o 0 O O y N '�'� s9 M N ds zs y N es s9 69 �O 69 zs � 69 EA 00 00 69 69 zs es 69 69 w ,� � ry � � d Qn N p O O p 0 Ro o ono p p e y b a3i k o o e CD3a3 333 333 AAA v a Ir �a 05 U F,mo W a> W W W C F" v W C o?J v W C L v W L r� nil C W O O 'C bq O O O O O O O bA O O p bA O O i O O W ca rr rr x � � 0 40 ^I � V .o ��� 3��� O O O O O O 333333 O O O O 3333 O O O O 3333 O O O O C 3333 y33 �;Raaaaa Oa OaOa 0 0 0 0 0 0 F" O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 609 409 O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 o O O O O p p N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 6 O colO O O O £A 7 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O o0 O O O O O� N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v� Vi yj V Vi V 69 69 69 69 N 69 •-+3 N O N V 7 _O Vi fA _O N 69 fA M O .Ni Y3 f-1 N Q a C 7 h h h 'D r-�, Vi 69 69 69 -. w H3 69 b9 69 b9 69 �y 69 69 69 Mffi v� 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 bpN O O O O O O 7 N O O O O p O O O N O N b• b o v� o0 o p o0000000000 D N O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O p b9 69 b9 b9 �n O O O b9 O �n P� O O o00 00o b N N O 000 000 r N � �D � 4w9 4�9 D N O p O O O O O O O O O O O ,b o p va 55 c9 c5 v� o z5 o cis o �n � N � Vj flj � O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O b�D9 N 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o o p p O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 p p o0 O O O O O O O O O x O O N y� � 69 69 SNP. � 69 69 b9 N 69 69 � O y9 � O a a .^" O �3�3 e000 oAAA AAA �3 AAA ��¢ooA i. �, ou oo aaaa aao� �x aaa �¢g¢ we AitQQA CHFF HFF xcC F F ���jUAAF C� .w o 0 0 0 3 'bn o 0 o cn o o cu o o � 'bn eqqu en o o i � C y W c c c � :�' r c py G% O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w O O O O O O O O O uoi aaad, ad.d.d, aP.o:o: ad.o:o: aaa A a a. °3333 ,>, ,>,�AAq 'o^ C7C7C7C7 C7C�C�C� C7C7C7C7 C7C�C7C7 C7C7C7 C7C�fl, `u'AAAA��N C C0.1 ICI a ri �D ADD wD F° Exhibit O Immokalee Fire Control District THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 rSR 82 3/38 34 33 32 31 - 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 � z 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65� 64 63 '+ 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 108 107 106 105 104 -- � i; 9a 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 GR 846 E IMMOKALEE 121 122 131 132 COMMUNITY �y REDEVELOPMENT AREA 144 143 114 1 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 169 170 171 172 173 4 175 176 177 178 179 180 192 191 190 189 188 187 6 185 184 183 182 181 i Immokalee RO 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 4 225 226 227 228 240 239 '38 1 237 236 235 234 2 3 232 231 230 229 266 '•269 270 271 272 273 2 4 275 276 277 278 *40 2 288 28 28fi 285 284 2 3 282 281 280 279 341 342 343 r43 350 Oil Well RO341A 5 354 353 352 351 8 419 420 421 422 7 426 425 424 423 I FD Station Areas 30 31 Q 32 Other District Beats Immokalee Fire District Beats and Station Coverage Areas N W E s Prepared By: John Peabody Collier County Sheriff's Office E9-1-1 GIS Office February202O Exhibit O - Immokalee Fire Control District The Immokalee Fire Control District is in the process of updating their strategic plan. The proposed plan will focus on the following items: Personnel, Facilities, Insurance Services Office (ISO), and Sustainability. The following information is based on the draft strategic plan update. Personnel In 2018-19 fiscal year the District added two new part time administrative staff positions, Deputy Chief of Administration and Chief Financial Officer positions were created. The District has not increased the number of on duty firefighters since 2015. Currently staff is 30 Combat, 4 Admin, and 2 Part Time. Due to our current call volumes and the potential of growth of our district, the personnel needs will need to be adjusted to fit service and district operational needs. The following are the projected needs with -in this 5-year period. • 2021-22 Hire three firefighter / paramedics • 2022-23 Hire one EMS training chief and three firefighter / paramedics • 2023-24 Hire three firefighter / paramedics • 2024-25 Hire three Firefighter/ paramedics Facilities The District operates three stations for emergency response to calls throughout the 234 square miles of the District as well as mutual aid to the surrounding areas. • Station 30 — located at 502 New Market Rd. East Current demands — Fire, medical, rescue, prevention, Community/departmental conference and training room. Building has 4 bay spaces for apparatus and no additional storage space. Multiple apparatus are exposed to the elements. This station will be replaced with a new state of the art facility located at 510 New Market Rd. East. The state-of-the-art firehouse will feature three apparatus bays and be equipped with bunker gear storage and a shop area. Construction started December 2021, with a projected completion date of December 2022. The District plans to sell the 502 New Market Road facility once the new station is opened. Station 31 — located at 1107 Carson Road, closed in November 2018 for Fire Operations and is anticipated to reopen in October 2022 with engine company. Station 32 — located at 5368 Useppa Dr., Ave Maria, Florida. Opened in 2022 Current demands — Fire, medical, rescue, prevention and administrative headquarters. The Districts Emergency Command Center, community/ departmental conference and training room, also where the monthly Board meetings are held. This is a joint facility shared by Immokalee Fire, Collier County EMS, and Collier County Sheriff's Office. The District is proactively moving forward with facility project projection goals and is strategically planning to secure properties for future stations located in areas of the District that will see future growth. Insurance Services Office (ISO) The District strives to comply with the Insurance Services Office (ISO) requirements in an effort to provide better insurance rates to the community. The District's current ISO rating is a 4/9. The District plans to continue to improve the rating by a using an enhanced record keeping management program with regard to training, hydrant maintenance and proper apparatus purchases and vehicle maintenance. Exhibit O - Immokalee Fire Control District Sustainability The District recognizes the importance of providing adequate fire protection, rescue services and prevention to the community. In order to ensure adequate funds are available to meet organizational needs both now, and in the future for capital improvement, fire prevention, emergency services, training and education. The District will continue to review the impact fee structure and consult with the Board to make impact fees fair and equitable for all. The District continues to develop investment policies, as well as inventory control policies, accounting policies, and capitalization procedures to maintain accurate records and manage the District's resources. The District is constantly pursuing grants to fund special projects, equipment and manpower and will continue to do so. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit P Collier County Public Schools Data Sheet THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit P — Collier County Public Schools Over the last eight years capacity (2014-2022) has been added to the Immokalee schools to accommodate growth. Prior to the 2014-15 school year all 61h grade classes were housed at the elementary schools. Once an addition was opened at the middle school all 6th grade classes were moved to the middle school. As a result, there was additional space at the elementary level and no additional capacity improvements were needed at the elementary. Finally, the current Capital Improvement Plan includes a 500 seat addition at the high school scheduled to open August 2022. With the completion of the high school addition in August 2022, there will be adequate permanent capacity for all CCPS schools in Immokalee. Future school capacity needs for Immokalee schools are reevaluated every year. This process is part of the annual update of CCPS's five year Capital Improvement Plan. The plan addresses future capacity needs resulting from changes in enrollment over time so that adequate space is available to meet projected enrollments. Elementary Schools Grades Eden Park Elementary (0631) PK-5th Lake Trafford Elementary (0191) PK-5th Pinecrest Elementary (0161) PK-5th Village Oaks Elementary School (0341) PK-5th Highlands Elementary School (0181) PK-5th Middle Schools Immokalee Middle School (0361) 6th-8th High School Immokalee High School (0271) 9th-12th Charter RCMA Immokalee Community Academy (9021) PK-8th Alternative Programs Bethune Education Center PK-12th THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit Q Framework Map THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK kS /( _ ( §\ ) 4 ƒ #� co/_ // a ) _ 2§ . _ w e JE e $ 3 (§ w ! $ 3 E . )) � _IX o= f\ G k �\ \ aE {j _ k °LU�o e § cc k \ (VIA ! 4} 2¢ § k§259 §% / ■Z§ - z 0. ® §$§ \ /\\ U) E5 L 0 �§ 2 \ z- > 202 ; _0 J® ■ % . d z o � LLJ . . ^ ) 13 _= 2 LLJ # � / / �Z ] o k » \ § 3 cn uj\ \\ 0 $ .§ —T -dT k"au x « .. E ) « }\ ® 26 \ § \$ } / W ~ '0\ LLJ\a \ 0 b > C LU §LL, °? 5}\ �� u u \� R J Yi{ ® k 02 i /ƒ# j _,{\§=2 J ƒ l -E ® k k ° 3 e :y ± G / * o = '� 'a ® * G u 2 2= u= z 2 _ U THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit R Budgeted Capital Projects (Non-CRA) THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Budgetted Capital Projects wtihin ICRA - Non-CRA Funded Expansion to four -lanes with bike FDOT FDOT State Route 82 from Gator Slough Lane to State Route 29 $29,000,000 On -going, estimated lanes and 10-foot multi -use path completion FY2022 and roundabout at SR82/29 intersection AUIR/FDOT 2021-26 Work FOOT State Route 82 from Hendry County Line to Gator Slough Lanel $38,640,141 FY2023-24 I Expansionwith tpathe Program d10-four multi -use FDOT 2021-26 Work SR 29 FROM CR 846 E TO N OF NEW MARKET W (New Bypass FY2D23-2025 -Environmental Construction $49,910,000 Years Program FDOT Road) $56 ,730,000 &Right-Of-Way$6,820,000 2036-45 FOOT 2021-26 Work FOOT SR 29 FROM N OF NEW MARKET RD TO SR 82 $31,801,703 FY2022-24 - Environmental & Construction $30,360,000 Years Program & 2045 LRTP Right -Of -Way $1,441,703 2026-30 Right-of-Way$5,630,000 Years FDOT 2021-26 Work FOOT SR 29 FROM AGRICULTRAL WAY TO CR 846 E $28,980,000 FY2024-25-Pre-Engineering 2031-2035 Construction Program $30,000 $23,320,000 Years 2036-45 Right -of -Way $8,480,000 2045 LRTP Collier MPO Little League Road Extension from Westclox to SR82 $15,810,000 FY2036-45 Pre -Engineering $7,330,000 Years 2036-45 Right -of -Way $550,000 2045 LRTP Collier MPO Immokalee Road (CR 846) from SR29 to Airpark Blvd $7,200,000 FY2036-45 Pre -Engineering $770,000 Construction $5,880,000 Years 2036-45 Right -of Way $550,000 2045 LRTP Collier MPO Westclox Street Extension from Little League Road to West of $5,510,000 FY2031-35 -Pre-Engineering Construction $4,450,000 Carson Road $510,000 Years 2036-45 TIPPENS TER Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Lake Trafford Rd to Deer Run Rd adopted paving plan BASS RD Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Tippens Ter to Taylor Ter adopted paving plan PERCH PL Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Tippens Ter to Taylor Ter adopted paving plan QUAIL ROOST RD Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Tippens Ter to Taylor Ter adopted paving plan DEER RUN RD Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Tippens Ter to Taylor Ter adopted paving plan GLADIOLA ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Immokalee Dr to Santa Rosa Ave adopted paving plan FORRESTER AVE Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from N 11th ST to end adopted paving plan JEFFERSON AVE W Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from N 15th St to Charlotte St adopted paving plan JEFFERSON AVE E Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Charlotte St to Nixon or adopted paving plan LEE ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from N 15th St to Madison Ave W adopted paving plan KISSIMMEE ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Jefferson Ave W to Madison Ave W adopted paving plan JACKSON ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Jefferson Ave W to Madison Ave W adopted paving plan GLADES ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from N 9thh St to Madison Ave W adopted paving plan FLAGLER ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Washington Ave to Calle Amistad adopted paving plan ESCAM BIA ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Immokalee to Calle Amistad adopted paving plan DADE ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Immokalee to Dixie Ave adopted paving plan JEROME DR Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Main St to New Market Rd adopted paving plan JEFFERSON AVE E Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from Main St to loth Ct S adopted paving plan PEAR ST Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation from End (Eden Ave) to End adopted paving plan DIMAR LN Provided per Road & Bridge FY 2021 Paving Plan Transportation a - — — 1mod..... 1 .ate., Transit Stop Improvements Collier Area Transit 7Stops ADA Pads TIGER Construction 2022 TIGER Complete Streets Grant Transit Stop Improvements Collier Area Transit 1Stop Bench TIGER Construction 2022 TIGER Complete Streets Grant Transit Stop Improvements Collier Area Transit 3 stops Shelters TIGER Construction 2022 TIGER Complete Streets Grant Transit Stop Improvements Collier Area Transit 7 stops Recommended ADA Pad NA Construction TBD Bus Stop Improvement Plan - 11/16/2020 Transit Stop Improvements Collier Area Transit 5 stops Recommended Benches NA Construction TBD Bus Stop Improvement Plan - 11/16/2020 Transit Stop Improvements Collier Area Transit 8 Stops Recommended Shelters NA Construction TBD Bus Stop Improvement Plan - 11/16/2020 Transit Stop Improvements Collier Area Transit 42 Stops No Improvement Recommended or Identified NA NA Bus Stop Improvement Plan - 11/16/2020 Page 1 of 4 -20 miles of concrete sidewalks -1 mile of shared -use path -20 miles of upgraded drainage/ditch and swales Immokalee Complete -32 intersection enhancing treatments at priority intersections Waiting on design builder selection Streets Transportation -Enhanced bus stop amenities/shelters to determine extent of the project Investment Generation Economic Recovery (TIGER) Sidewalks -Construction of a Bus Transfer Station at the Collier County $16,415,864 Start construction 2022 based on cost and available Grant/AUIR Health Department in Immokalee funding -5 miles of street lights and 106 lit intersections -5 mile neighborhood bike boulevard network with traffic calming and wayfinding 2019 CRA Annual Report MSTU Stormwater Little League Road to Laurel Street $799,460 Construction FY 2020-21 Lake Trafford Road Projects - Add sidewalk to south side of Street 2019 CRA Annual Report MSTU Stormwater Carson Road to Laurel Street $642,884 Construction FY 2020-22 Lake Trafford Road Projects -Add bike lanes 2019 CRA Annual Report MSTU Stormwater Little League Road to Tippins Terrace TBD Design FY 2020 Lake Trafford Road Projects - Stormwater project and pathway Construction timing TBD AUIR/FDOT 2021-26 Work FDOT/MPO Eden Park Elementary School Sidewalks Estimated $633,000 Construction FY 2021-22 Program -Add sidewalk on south and west side of road FDOT 2021-26 Work FDOT Immokalee City Sidewalks - Various Locations $719,046 FY2023/24 Program -Immokalee Stormwater Improvements (P/N 60143) This project includes an update to the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan, future stormwater treatment pond sighting feasibility analysis, Right -of -Way, Design and coordination with the Lake Trafford Immokalee Stormwater $12,SOO,OOOtotal project Management Group, and the Improvement Project/AUIR Stormwater Management cost' Permitting, and Construction Immokalee Water and Sewer starting in 2021 District. Future stormwater management improvement projects, as prioritized by the master plan update, will be fully coordinated and vetted with the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency. Lake Trafford Road Area: Phase 1-Arrowhead Tract 3; Phase 2 Phase 1- Construction late Immokalee Stormwater Stormwater Management Lake Trafford Rd. pathway and drainage improvements from Estimated $10,300,000 Fa112021; Phase 2- Need specifics of Phase 3 & 4 Improvement Project/AUIR Little League Rd. to Tippins Terrace; Phase 3 -; Phase 4 - TBD Construction late Fall 2022; Phase 3 -TBD; Phase 4 - TBD Staff is working with FDOT's design firms to coordinate the alignment FY21/22 - Design and Property of the SR-29 bypass loop so they Immokalee Stormwater Stormwater Management Madison Avenue Channel Project Estimated $5,100,000 Acquisition; Construction - can avoid having to route the Improvement Project/AUIR stormwater from the Madison TBD Avenue channel all the way around the north and east sides of the airport. Immokalee Stormwater Stormwater Management Fish Branch Creek Project Estimated $5,000,000 TBD Prioritization TBD Improvement Project/AUIR Immokalee Stormwater Stormwater Management East Delaware Avenue Area Project Estimated $1,000,000 TBD Prioritization TBD Improvement Project/AUIR Immokalee Stormwater Stormwater Management Immokalee Slough Flow Capacity Project Estimated $300,000 TBD Prioritization TBD Improvement Project/AUIR Immokalee Stormwater Stormwater Management Roberts Avenue West water Quality Project Estimated $500,000 TBD Prioritization TBD Improvement Project/AUIR Immokalee Stormwater Stormwater Management Seminole Reservation Pump Station(s) Project Estimated - NA TBD Prioritization TBD Improvement Project/AUIR 2019 CRA Annual Report MSTU Stormwater North 3rd Street Drainage Project Estimated $600,000 FY-21/22 - Design Construction proposed Summer 2021 2019 CRA Annual Report MSTU Stormwater Eden Garden Improvement Project Estimated $600,001 FY21/22-Design Construction proposed late Fall 21 Estimated $2,000,000 FY-2019-20 AUIR School District Immokalee High School Additions/Renovations Estimated $16,500,000 FY-2020-21 IW&SD 5-Year CIP Immokalee Water & Sewer Line 8" Clay Pipe Sewers in T' Section $814,736 FY2021-22 Wastewater System District (IWSD) IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD Line 8" Clay Pipe Sewers in Farm Worker's Village "A" Section $721,493 FY2022-23 Wastewater System IW&SD S-Year CIP IWSD Line Key Manholes Throughout System $350,000 FY2021-25 Wastewater System IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD Oxidation Ditch Bridges $163,000 FY2021-22 Wastewater System IW&SD S-Year CIP IWSD Deep Injection Well#2 $8,300,000 FY2021-23 Wastewater System IW&SD S-Year CIP IWSD New 3.0 MGD Public Access Re -Use Water System $3,060,000 FY2022-25 Wastewater System IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD Fuel Storage Tank at Airport WTP $90,000 FY2021-22 Water System IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD Legacy Lots& Water Main Looping $3,210,000 FY2021-23 Water System IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD IFAS Tank& Booster Station $2,200,000 FY2022-23 Water System IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD New 2.5 MGD Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant $400,000 FY2024-25 Water System- Design Engineering Only IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD New Maintenance Building $1,660,000 FY2021-22 General Project IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD Fuel Storage Tanks at JVW WTP&WWTP $2260000 FY2022-23 General Project IW&SD S-Year CIP IWSD Utility Relocation for SR29 Widening from CR846 to $1,780,000 FY2022-25 General Project Agriculture Way Page 2 of 4 IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD Utilities for SR29 By -Pass from CR846 to north of New Market $180,000 FY2024-25 General Project - Design Road Engineering Only IW&SD 5-Year CIP IWSD District Wide Water and Sewer Expansion $100,000 FV2024-25 General Project - Design Engineering Only AUIR IL Jails I Immokalee Jail Expansion 64 bed expansion Estimated $5,957,376 FY 2026-27 ir FDOT 21-26 Work Program Immokalee Regional Airport Environmental Assessment Airpark Extension $166,700 FY2023-24 Environmental Assessment FDOT 21-26 Work Program Immokalee Regional Airport Runway18/36 Rehabilitate $500,000 FY2021-22 Construction FDOT 21-26 Work Program Immokalee Regional Airport Runway 9/27 Extension $200,000 FY25-26 Environmental Assessment FDOT 21-26 Work Program Immokalee Regional Airport Airpark Blvd Extension $500,000 FY25-26 Construction FDOT 21-26 Work Program Immokalee Regional Airport Perimeter Road/Taxiway A Modification $1,263,700 FV-21-23 Construction FDOT 21-26 Work Program Immokalee Regional Airport Fuel Farm $375,000 FY2023-24 Construction Immokalee Area ear Parks & Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex -Generators Funded 2021 Capital Prioritiesies Immokalee Area 5-Year Immokalee Community Park- Parking Lot Resurface & Priority funding indicates project Capital Priorities Parks & Recreation Restriping w/curbing Priority Funding 2022 has been included in FY22 Budget Request Immokalee Area 5-Year Priorityfunding indicates project Capital Priorities Parks & Recreation Immokalee South Park- Playground Replacement Priority Funding 2022 has been included in FY22 Budget Request Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex - Replacement of competition Funded 2022 Capital Priorities Pool Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex - Interactive Water Feature Splash Funded 2022 Capital Priorities Pad Resurfaced Immokalee Area 5-Year Immokalee Sports Complex - Parking Lot Assessment for Priority funding indicates project Capital Priorities Parks & Recreation Underground Tanks Priority Funding 2022 has been included in FY22 Budget Request Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex - Pump House Improvements Funded 2022 Capital Priorities Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Funded 2022 Capital Priorities Immokalee Area 5-Year Immokalee Sports Complex -Add Concession Building w/ TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities Parks &Recreation Bathrooms TBD 2022 has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Area -Add Soccer Field, Fence and Access security Priority Funding 2022 Location has not been determined Capital Priorities Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Dreamland Neighborhood Park - Add Open Space Athletic TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities Field has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Dreamland Neighborhood Park- Playground Lighting TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Dreamland Neighborhood Park- Playground Shade Structure TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Airport Park- Fence Renovation TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Airport Park- Pavilion Assessment TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned butfunding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Airport Park- Playground Replacement TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Community Park- Pathway Renovation TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Community Park-Skatepark Rehab TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Community Park- Replace Wall Partitions TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee South Park - Add Irrigation System to Open Space TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned butfunding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks &Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex -Additional ADA Renovations and TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities Improvements has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks &Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex - Multi -Purpose Fields LED Lighting TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities Conversion has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex -Ventilation system Remediation TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities at Fitness Center & Gym has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex - Parking lot Renovation TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex -CDBG Building Hardening TBD 2023 TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Dreamland Neighborhood Park - Add LED Sports Lighting to TBD 2024 TBD indicates planned butfunding Capital Priorities Field has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Parks & Recreation Immokalee Community Park- Parking Lot Renovation TBD 2024 TBD indicates planned butfunding Capital Priorities has not been determined Page 3 of 4 Immokalee Area 5-Year TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities parks &Recreation Immokalee Community Park - Softball Field Irrigation TBD 2024 has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Immokalee Community Park- Walking Path Extension and Add TBD indicates planned butfunding Capital Priorities parks & Recreation Lighting TBD 2024 has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Immokalee Sports Complex - Soccer Feld TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities Parks &Recreation Repair/Replace/Upgrade TBD 2024 has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year Capital Priorities parks & Recreation Immokalee Area - Land Purchase for Additional Park TBD 2024 Location Undetermined Immokalee Area 5-Year Immokalee Community Park- Irrigation Pumpsystem TBD indicates planned butfunding Capital Priorities Parks &Recreation Renovation TBD 2025 has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year TBD indicates planned butfunding Capital Priorities parks &Recreation Immokalee Community Park - Softball Field Dugout TBD 2025 has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities parks &Recreation Immokalee South Park- Emergency Exit Door VPK Room TBD 2025 has not been determined Immokalee Area 5-Year TBD indicates plbut funding Capital Priorities parks &Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex -Fence Renovation TBD 2025 has not been detanned ermined Immokalee Area 5-Year TBD indicates plbut funding Capital Priorities parks &Recreation Immokalee Sports Complex -Lighting Assessment TBD 2025 has not been detanned ermined Immokalee Area 5-Year TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities parks &Recreation ImSports Complex -Sidewalk Repairs TBD 2025 has not been detmokalee ermined Immokalee Area 5-Year Immokalee Area -additional Recreation Facilities in TBD indicates planned but funding Capital Priorities Parks &Recreation Immokalee TBD 2026 has not been determined Page 4 of 4 Exhibit S TIF & MSTU Projections with 3% and 5% Growth Rates THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Figure 4-4-4 TIF Projects Based on 3% Growth Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area TIF Increment Total Fiscal Tax Taxable Tax $ Change TIF Year Year Value Base Increment per Year Provided FY22 2021 391,123,283 148,645,590 242,477,693 - 1,007,000 FY23 2022 402,856,981 148,645,590 254,211,391 11,733,698 1,055,700 FY24 2023 414,942,690 148,645,590 266,297,100 12,085,709 1,105,900 FY25 2024 427,390,971 148,645,590 278,745,381 12,448,281 1,157,600 FY26 2025 440,212,700 148,645,590 291,567,110 12,821,729 1,210,900 FY27 2026 453,419,081 148,645,590 304,773,491 13,206,381 1,265,700 FY28 2027 467,021,653 148,645,590 318,376,063 13,602,572 1,322,200 FY29 2028 481,032,303 148,645,590 332,386,713 14,010,650 1,380,400 FY30 2029 495,463,272 148,645,590 346,817,682 14,430,969 1,440,300 FY31 2030 510,327,170 148,645,590 361,681,580 14,863,898 1,502,100 FY32 2031 525,636,985 148,645,590 376,991,395 15,309,815 1,565,600 FY33 2032 541,406,095 148,645,590 392,760,505 15,769,110 1,631,100 FY34 2033 557,648,278 148,645,590 409,002,688 16,242,183 1,698,600 FY35 2034 574,377,726 148,645,590 425,732,136 16,729,448 1,768,000 FY36 2035 591,609,058 148,645,590 442,963,468 17,231,332 1,839,600 FY37 2036 609,357,330 148,645,590 460,711,740 17,748,272 1,913,300 FY38 2037 627,638,050 148,645,590 478,992,460 18,280,720 1,989,200 FY39 2038 646,467,192 148,645,590 497,821,602 18,829,142 2,067,400 FY40 2039 665,861,208 148,645,590 517,215,618 19,394,016 2,148,000 FY41 2040 685,837,044 148,645,590 537,191,454 19,975,836 2,230,900 FY42 2041 706,412,155 148,645,590 557,766,565 20,575,111 2,316,400 FY43 2042 727,604,520 148,645,590 578,958,930 21,192,365 2,404,400 FY44 2043 749,432,656 148,645,590 600,787,066 21,828,136 2,495,000 FY45 2044 771,915,636 148,645,590 623,270,046 22,482,980 2,588,400 FY46 2045 795,073,105 148,645,590 646,427,515 23,157,469 2,684,600 FY47 2046 818,925,298 148,645,590 670,279,708 23,852,193 2,783,600 FY48 2047 843,493,057 148,645,590 694,847,467 24,567,759 2,885,600 FY49 2048 868,797,849 148,645,590 720,152,259 25,304,792 2,990,700 FY50 2049 894,861,784 148,645,590 746,216,194 26,063,935 3,099,000 FY51 2050 921,707,638 148,645,590 773,062,048 26,845,854 3,210,400 FY52 20511 949,358,867 148,645,590 800,713,277 27,651,229 3,325,300 Grand Total 62,082,900 Figure 4-4-5 TIF Projects Based on 5% Growth Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area TIF Increment Total Fiscal Tax Taxable Tax $ Change TIF Year Year Value Base Increment per Year Provided FY22 2021 391,123,283 148,645,590 242,477,693 - 1,007,000 FY23 2022 410,679,447 148,645,590 262,033,857 19,556,164 1,088,200 FY24 2023 431,213,419 148,645,590 282,567,829 20,533,972 1,173,500 FY25 2024 452,774,090 148,645,590 304,128,500 21,560,671 1,263,000 FY26 2025 475,412,795 148,645,590 326,767,205 22,638,705 1,357,100 FY27 2026 499,183,435 148,645,590 350,537,845 23,770,640 1,455,800 FY28 2027 524,142,607 148,645,590 375,497,017 24,959,172 1,559,400 FY29 2028 550,349,737 148,645,590 401,704,147 26,207,130 1,668,300 FY30 2029 577,867,224 148,645,590 429,221,634 27,517,487 1,782,500 FY31 2030 606,760,585 148,645,590 458,114,995 28,893,361 1,902,500 FY32 2031 637,098,614 148,645,590 488,453,024 30,338,029 2,028,500 FY33 2032 668,953,545 148,645,590 520,307,955 31,854,931 2,160,800 FY34 2033 702,401,222 148,645,590 553,755,632 33,447,677 2,299,700 FY35 2034 737,521,283 148,645,590 588,875,693 35,120,061 2,445,600 FY36 2035 774,397,347 148,645,590 625,751,757 36,876,064 2,598,700 FY37 2036 813,117,214 148,645,590 664,471,624 38,719,867 2,759,500 FY38 2037 853,773,075 148,645,590 705,127,485 40,655,861 2,928,300 FY39 2038 896,461,729 148,645,590 747,816,139 42,688,654 3,105,600 FY40 2039 941,284,815 148,645,590 792,639,225 44,823,086 3,291,700 FY41 2040 988,349,056 148,645,590 839,703,466 47,064,241 3,487,200 FY42 2041 1,037,766,509 148,645,590 889,120,919 49,417,453 3,692,400 FY43 2042 1,089,654,834 148,645,590 941,009,244 51,888,325 3,907,900 FY44 2043 1,144,137,576 148,645,590 995,491,986 54,482,742 4,134,200 FY45 2044 1,201,344,455 148,645,590 1,052,698,865 57,206,879 4,371,700 FY46 2045 1,261,411,678 148,645,590 1,112,766,088 60,067,223 4,621,200 FY47 2046 1,324,482,262 148,645,590 1,175,836,672 63,070,584 4,883,100 FY48 2047 1,390,706,375 148,645,590 1,242,060,785 66,224,113 5,158,100 FY49 2048 1,460,241,694 148,645,590 1,311,596,104 69,535,319 5,446,900 FY50 2049 1,533,253,779 148,645,590 1,384,608,189 73,012,085 5,750,100 FY51 2050 1,609,916,468 148,645,590 1,461,270,878 76,662,689 6,068,500 FY52 20501 1,690,412,291 148,645,590 1,541,766,701 80,495,823 6,402,700 Grand Total 95,799,700 Figure 4-4-6 Three Percent Annual Growth Rate Immokalee Beautification MSTU Total Fiscal Tax Taxable Ad Valorem Year Year Value Millage Taxes Levied FY22 2021 460,757,386 1.0000 460,800 FY23 2022 474,580,108 1.0000 474,600 FY24 2023 488,817,511 1.0000 488,900 FY25 2024 503,482,036 1.0000 503,500 FY26 2025 518,586,497 1.0000 518,600 FY27 2026 534,144,092 1.0000 534,200 FY28 2027 550,168,415 1.0000 550,200 FY29 2028 566,673,467 1.0000 566,700 FY30 2029 583,673,671 1.0000 583,700 FY31 2030 601,183,881 1.0000 601,200 FY32 2031 619,219,397 1.0000 619,300 FY33 2032 637,795,979 1.0000 637,800 FY34 2033 656,929,858 1.0000 657,000 FY35 2034 676,637,754 1.0000 676,700 FY36 2035 696,936,887 1.0000 697,000 FY37 2036 717,844,994 1.0000 717,900 FY38 2037 739,380,344 1.0000 739,400 FY39 2038 761,561,754 1.0000 761,600 FY40 2039 784,408,607 1.0000 784,500 FY41 2040 807,940,865 1.0000 808,000 FY42 2041 832,179,091 1.0000 832,200 FY43 2042 857,144,464 1.0000 857,200 FY44 2043 882,858,798 1.0000 882,900 FY45 2044 909,344,562 1.0000 909,400 FY46 2045 936,624,899 1.0000 936,700 FY47 2046 964,723,646 1.0000 964,800 FY48 2047 993,665,355 1.0000 993,700 FY49 2048 1,023,475,316 1.0000 1,023,500 FY50 2049 1,054,179,575 1.0000 1,054,200 FY51 2050 1,085,804,962 1.0000 1,085,900 FY52 2051 1,118, 379,111 1.0000 1,118,400 Grand Total 23,040,500 Figure 4-4-7 Five Percent Annual Growth Rate Immokalee Beautification MSTU Total Fiscal Tax Taxable Ad Valorem Year Year Value Taxes Levied FY22 2021 460,757,386 460,800 FY23 2022 483,795,255 483,800 FY24 2023 507,985,018 508,000 FY25 2024 533,384,269 533,400 FY26 2025 560,053,482 560,100 FY27 2026 588,056,156 588,100 FY28 2027 617,458,964 617,500 FY29 2028 648,331,912 648,400 FY30 2029 680,748,508 680,800 FY31 2030 714,785,933 714,800 FY32 2031 750,525,230 750,600 FY33 2032 788,051,492 788,100 FY34 2033 827,454,067 827,500 FY35 2034 868,826,770 868,900 FY36 2035 912,268,109 912,300 FY37 2036 957,881,514 957,900 FY38 2037 1,005,775,590 1,005,800 FY39 2038 1,056,064,370 1,056,100 FY40 2039 1,108,867,589 1,108,900 FY41 2040 1,164,310,968 1,164,400 FY42 2041 1,222,526,516 1,222,600 FY43 2042 1,283,652,842 1,283,700 FY44 2043 1,347,835,484 1,347,900 FY45 2044 1,415,227,258 1,415,300 FY46 2045 1,485,988,621 1,486,000 FY47 2046 1,560,288,052 1,560,300 FY48 2047 1,638,302,455 1,638,400 FY49 2048 1,720,217,578 1,720,300 FY50 2049 1,806,228,457 1,806,300 FY51 2050 1,896,539,880 1,896,600 FY52 2051 1,991,366,874 1,991,400 Grand Total 32,605,000 Exhibit T Street Layout Map THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK .r a 1 [ � E _ n « (\� / , � $& io }\ / \ . o oww §T � _ - x -\z z . 6-M z,ci {; § LU Lu � 2 LU LU 3 LU THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK �q 23; " V* Creativity in Bloom SECTION 5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan First Amendment Indale K�Oliver design May 2019 Cover Photo Sources: Zyscovich Architects; Google.com - Marys Palacios TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.0 Executive Summary............................................................................................5-E-1 5.0.1 Executive Summary.................................................................................5-E-1 5.0.2 Goals........................................................................................................5-E-1 5.0.3 Conceptual Plan Diagram........................................................................5-E-4 5.0.4 Character Areas.......................................................................................5-E-7 5.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment.........................................................................5-E-9 5.0.6 Prioritization & Funding........................................................................5-E-10 5.0.7 2000 & 2019 Plan Comparison..............................................................5-E-14 5.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................5-1-1 5.1.1 Vision.......................................................................................................5-1-1 5.1.2 Process.....................................................................................................5-1-1 5.1.3 Plan Organization....................................................................................5-1-1 5.2 Background.........................................................................................................5-2-1 5.2.1 Creation of the CRA Area........................................................................5-2-1 5.2.2 2000 Redevelopment Plan Goals and Projects.......................................5-2-1 5.2.3 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA 2019 Perspective................................5-2-9 5.3 Planning Framework & Elements.......................................................................5-3-1 5.3.1 Conceptual Plan Diagram........................................................................5-3-2 5.3.2 Land Use & Urban Design........................................................................5-3-7 5.3.3 Public Space, Parks, & Open Space.......................................................5-3-26 5.3.4 Development.........................................................................................5-3-31 5.3.5 Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability.........................................5-3-42 5.3.6 Infrastructure........................................................................................5-3-59 5.3.7 Process...................................................................................................5-3-66 5.3.8 Character Areas.....................................................................................5-3-67 5.4 Prioritization Plan...............................................................................................5-4-1 5.4.1 Prioritization of Projects & Initiatives......................................................5-4-1 5.4.2 Financing Planning...................................................................................5-4-1 5.4.3 Projects & Initiatives Prioritization.........................................................5-4-5 5.4.4 Coordination & Partnerships.................................................................5-4-17 5.5 General Requirements.......................................................................................5-5-1 5.5.1 Overview of Relevant Statutes................................................................5-5-1 5.5.2 Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan..............................5-5-1 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/Clearance, & Improvement..............................5-5-1 5.5.4 Zoning & Comprehensive Plan Changes.................................................5-5-1 5.5.5 Land Use, Densities, & Building Requirements.......................................5-5-1 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact.............................................................................5-5-5 5.5.7 Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & Assurances...................................5-5-5 5.6 Tax Increment & MSTU Estimates......................................................................5-6-1 5.6.1 Tax Increment Financing.........................................................................5-6-1 5.6.2 Municipal Service Taxing Units(MSTUs).................................................5-6-2 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions.......................................................................5-6-12 This page is intentionally left blank. 00000 �V, Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MOM 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0.1 Executive Summary The Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan amendment provides an updated long-term vision and approach for the redevelopment of this component area (see Map 5-ES-1). The Plan brings together information gathered from technical analysis, fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach (documented in further detail in a separate Assessment Memo). From these efforts and the resulting themes identified, an overarching vision emerged for the future of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and this component 5.0.2 Goals The main goals of the Plan include: Land Use & Urban Design Promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. Public Space, Parks, & Open Space Ensure accessible, activated, and well -maintained public spaces, parks, and open space. Development area: Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Promote quality of life and economic vitality with a mixed -income, urban, and prosperity for community members. Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability Ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various methods of transportation within and connecting with multi -modal community that welcomes visitors, the CRA area. cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, Infrastructure uplifts unique local destinations, and finds balance Provide effective infrastructure that preserves with the natural environment environmental and neighborhood design quality through coordinated improvement planning and funding. Process The Redevelopment Area Plan lays out a framework of Carry out CRA area planning and implementation goals, objectives, and strategies organized thematically efforts to engage and serve the various communities in support of this overall vision, along with a list of within the CRA area. projects to carry out the framework. This plan is meant to provide a palette of options, generated by the technical analysis, fieldwork observations, and public Figure 5-ES-1 provides a Concept Diagram focused on and agency outreach, that the CRA can further location -specific capital improvement projects, explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will followed by a list of non -location -specific capital necessarily be carried through to full implementation. improvements projects and a description of non - Full implementation of approaches and projects will be based on further study of capacity, technical feasibility, and public priorities. 0000 �5-E-1 capital projects (e.g., plans, studies, grant programs). Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Map 5-ES-1: Boyshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area N 7 KIRKWO OD A I '-AVE t V1 I < NONE* 7i\ r7c( � akr Sugden Re ional Pa rk 11)171 7m c '0f7THCO)MASSON DR Lu Z PIL .S KARFN DR 7 Nai les �East Naples Communi _J Botanical Garden Par Bayvl, V Park CRA Boundary Collier County Government Center alC k A& ANDREWSAV - -- -- - City of Naples within CRA j - - --- ---- ----- Park • . ...... .. . j••Wetlands A, 7 Ll City of Naples S ' k....... A .7.7: A&' .... ..... ---- ----- j, ... ..... ... .. W& .2 Ve M .� A�. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 �5-E-2 5.0 j EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This page is intentionally left blank. 5-E-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Figure5-ES-1: Redevelopment Concept Public Space, Parks, & Open Space Triangle Retention Pond Improvements 5.0.3 Conceptual Plan Diagram Figure 5-ES-1 provides a Concept Plan illustrating future land use and capital improvements with associated goals of Land Use & Design; Public Space Parks, & Open Space; Development; Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability; and Infrastructure. See the map legend on the following page for project descriptions and additional capital improvements without specified locations at this time. Note that "Major Corridors" are based on highways, minor arterials, and major arterials in the CRA area. i1! "' 1 Focus Corridor Complete Streets &Trail (Neighborhood) Major Corridor Jeepers Dr. Land Use & Design Public Space, Parks, & Open Development Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability Infrastructure Ap oc j. — C .• i � n � � ii ! C (0 act; i I ' ® i•Y'.i•ii 3i.•�i:•i•ii,. iL•-1 •�i:• ''. WAS cc J . LWLUJ ' AIRPORT PULLING RD ; " " r '�ii Q �lr r BAYSHORE DR a i qf ARM, o Complete Streets (Major) Linwood Ave r—= 00, oe WZ0ovz Monument Sign for Gateway Intersection US 41 and Bayshore Dr. �w % �Q ' i o'11111L.& of o 10, ;i' Complete Streets (Major) Bayshore Dr. - US 41 to Thomosson Dr. N o rr •�� ❑CRA Boundary ' m Future Land Use QBayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Incorporated Area Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict ® Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict lj Urban Residenfial Subdistrict Park _= wetlands i—; City of Naples Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-E-4 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This page is intentionally left blank. 5-E-5 0ayshore Gate ayTnangle CRAArea Plan—May2019 WAINAIM IlElf.IMA Location -Specific Capital projects OGaRwry lntersecorn Design A_ Davis Blvtl/Arport Pulling Rd Improvements B. Davu&vtl/Sbadowlawn Or C Davis BwI/US 61 o. US 61/Baysbwe or E. momasson or/oommion or E Us<1/Osa la Ave © Development Projects A. Development of king Purpose Fachly/Structure © Parks improvements A_ Triangle R Benton Pond Improvements O Complete Streets (Major) A. Linwood Ave—PhaseI B. S adowlawn Ave C Seashore Di al/Ibomason or o. momassm or/xamikan Ave E. Commercial or E unwound hue/Kbkwood Ave Connethon G. Pine 4 Communion Complete Streets&Trail A_ Birytle/Pedestrian Tail (Neighborbaal B. lrepersIX C Unwood Rre—Phase ll D. Republic or E. Donmrd9 F. Say St G. aayshore or—Thomasson or/Hdry Ave Q Parking A. Surface/garage carna lni Triangle area B. Suroce/garage parining—Bayshore area C Car/boat parking—Bashew Park area Road Engineering A_ One Tree Or OGeneral Standard Improvements B. Andrews Ave C Wheal Ave o. Holy Ave E. palmetto O InlastmRure A. Underground/Relrcafe Overhead Ufibty Ones—Onwmd Ave and Commenual Or B. Underground/Reloa(e Overhead Ufibty Ones—Bayshore Or 0000 bE-5 Oayshore Gateway Triangle CM Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15.0 Non -Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Project Name Public Space, Parks, & Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition & Development B. General Parks Improvements C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation, Connectivity, & A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements D. General Multi -Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines Non -Capital Projects Projects and initiatives that are not capital investments include a variety of plans, studies, and grant programs in support of redevelopment or capital project planning throughout the CRA area. These non - capital projects and initiatives include: CRA operating expenditures and administrative updates Land Development Code updates Development support for catalyst development sites Master planning for: • Stormwater improvements • Arts and culture -oriented development and redevelopment efforts • Implementation of Complete Streets projects • Community safety and clean-up • Branding • Marketing and communications • Water and fire infrastructure improvements Feasibility studies, including: • General market study/economic profile • Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical feasibility • Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project • Triangle retention pond improvements • Micro -enterprise and arts incubator Grants and funding programs, including: • Residential improvements grants/loans • Commercial fagade improvements • Wall and fence funding for areas with incompatible uses • Public art funding • Economic development incentives • Mobile home replacements • Community Land Trust housing construction • Other affordable/workforce housing investments Other non -capital expenditures that may arise in the future and are not yet identified Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-E-6 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0.4 Character Areas The Redevelopment Area Plan framework can be tailored to different sub -areas depending on their specific character, needs, and opportunities. Map S-ES-2 lays out these different sub -areas, or "Character Areas" with accompanying descriptions. eMini Triangle/Davis • The Mini Triangle, including CRA-owned parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment opportunity and Focus Development Node • Corridor commercial along Davis • Linwood Avenue another potential area for redevelopment. 0 Airport Pulling • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big -box style retail, and County Center • Part of area currently designated as an Activity Center in Future Land Use Map OWindstar • Residential is primarily condos and single- family homes in gated communities • Includes golf course designated as a commercial use OSouth Bayshore • Primarily single-family residential neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development OShadowlawn • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix of apartments/duplexes and single-family homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area OTamiami • Corridor commercial and residences, including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows) • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area ONorth Bayshore • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with neighborhood commercial (including Haldeman Creek Entertainment Center near Creek) • Mix of multi- and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson with planned roundabout • CRA-owned Focus Development Node (17- Acre Site) ■ ■ ■ ■ Focus Corridor Focus Development Node/Intersection Op 5-E-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Map 5-ES-2: Character Areas ::.. DAVIS BLVD cc 64 RKWOOD AVE LINWOOD AVE do 41 - © �, G o LQ BARR TT AVE W al Sugd wI �DSTAR Qt egional o B�tr, _ >J.- D — Park w Q KARE N DR plc Naples = Bot�aFnical Park tY emu..:_._:..,••._:__-;_ .,al Garden Bayuiew :_: ..::_. �.'. �-----• .. _. _.._ ANDREWSAVE : = wlu :iia 13 CRA Boundary ,.,. . Park Wetlands IF M. Ile . u.Qd _? {-•y.... al,er # - � sat+,r �u?.'!'•.: �3Ur. �::'.`::"wLcr :.yl;:.: �u � . •i,-=- - .�.:., � �uu , alt :_. alu _' vlu vlri .._._. :__ v6u _ _• ., . _ " vlu ' ::..:::: t_ ' •� . ::::r vlic .:_:_. ?� _ ::::r vli� -_: ::_r :.::::: vl[r..:_.. _...... ✓ .:_ ::..:: vJtr .._. ?�1!� ::: Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-E-8 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment The following provides a focus of redevelopment for each Character Area based on the specific characteristics described in Map 5-ES-2 and the most relevant redevelopment strategies. 1. Mini Triangle/Davis • Urban -style mixed use commercial redevelopment, including capitalization on the Mini Triangle as a catalyst development site and urban -style parking solutions • Park development at retention pond site • Complete Streets design and commercial redevelopment along Linwood Ave and other nearby commercial roadways; pedestrian scale street design between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, and the proposed retention pond park • Improved access to Mini Triangle development from US 41, Davis Blvd, and Linwood Ave • Multi -modal connectivity: • Across Davis Blvd • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, proposed retention pond park, and eastern Triangle neighborhood • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge improvements • Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary sewers, electrical, stormwater 2. Shadowlawn • Residential structural enhancement and upgrades • Avoidance of incompatible uses • Transitional elements between different uses • Infill development on vacant residential lots • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets • Complete Street improvements along Shadowlawn Drive 3. Airport Pulling • Transitions between residential neighborhoods and commercial development • Eventual street enhancements, particularly connectivity across Airport Pulling Rd • Commercial fagade improvements 4. Tamiami • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 • Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows • Tenant opportunity and site improvements for walkable design at Gulfgate Plaza 5. Windstar • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along major community roadways, including Bayshore Drive, Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue • Access to Bayview Park 6. North Bayshore • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment Center near Creek and creative parking solutions • Larger redevelopment opportunities of 17-Acre Site and Del's 24 property • Arts and culture -oriented development • Transitional elements between corridor commercial and residential areas along Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive • Development of vacant residential lots Op 5-E-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and CRA area • Water main and fire suppression upgrades • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets 7. South Bayshore • Mobile home and single-family home residential improvements, upgrades, affordability • Development of vacant residential lots • Access to Bayview Park • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, including East Naples Community Park • Wetland, flooding, and site preparation considerations for development • Roadway improvements to meet County engineering standards • Neighborhood Complete Streets 5.0.6 Prioritization & Funding The Redevelopment Area Plan includes a prioritization plan recommending projects for the period through 2030 (11 years after the adoption of the amended Plan), the period for which tax increment financing (TIF) funding will be available. The remaining project recommendations are included for longer term implementation post-2030 and will require alternative funding sources aside from TIF. The Plan provides an overview of potential alternative funding sources. Table 5-ES-1 summarizes projected revenues through 2030 for various funding sources currently operating in the CRA area, including Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs) that are potential funding sources independent of TIF (dependent on coordination with and approval from the respective MSTU advisory boards). Note that the MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of the capital and non -capital planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects listed. It provides a guide and list of both capital and non -capital projects that require approval by the CRA Advisory Board within the initial 11-year programming period and allocation through the standard operating and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners if TIF revenues are to be used for funding. Approval by relevant decision -making bodies is required for other funding sources outside of TIF. Projects may also require additional vetting and piloting to better understand technical feasibility, impacts, and broader County implementation priorities prior to approval for implementation. To this end, planned projects include technical feasibility studies and pilot projects. As a result, this capital and non -capital funding plan is subject to change as it is re- evaluated. Additionally, the Plan sets a framework based on current conditions but allows for flexibility in phasing of projects based on funding opportunities and community priorities identified in annual work plans and capital improvement project lists. Figures 5-ES-2 and 5-ES-3 summarize the expenditure breakdown by timeframe and type of project/ initiative. Note that non -capital projects include studies, plans, and grant programs. Table 5-ES-2 compares projected TIF revenues and costs (note that some projects are programmed at a deficit because other funding partners or sources are anticipated, including after 2030 when TIF revenues will cease). Table 5-ES-3 shows CRA project costs that may also be eligible for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds, indicating the potential benefit from MSTU coordination. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-E-10 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table S-ES-1: Revenue Projection Summary Tax Increment Financing (TIF) $33,790,000 $0 Bayshore Beautification MSTU $20,193,000 TBD Haldeman Creek MSTU $1,762,000 TBD Note: 1The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. The MSTUs do not have a sun- set date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Figure 5-ES-2: Short-term costs by project type Total Short-Te $3, Land Use & Urban Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Design, 5165,000, 0% $1,050,000, 3% )pment, ,000, 3% 001* 5-E-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Figure S-ES-3: Long-term project costs by type Non -Capital, $6,735,000 , 8 Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Land Use & $3,144,404, 4% Urban Design, Development, $37,500, 0% $4,062,500, 5% plr�� �qv Infrastructure, 25190918651 30% Total Long -Term Costs (After 11 Years): $85.1 million Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-E-12 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table S-ES-2: Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues Funding Summary Total Capital Costs - North of US 41 (Triangle) Total Overall $44,945,859 Short-TermTIF (1-11 Years) $4,709,998 Long -Term (After 11 Years)' $40,235,861 Total Capital Costs - South of US 41 (Bayshore) $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Total Capital Costs $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Total Non -Capital Costs $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total TIF Revenue $33,790,000 $33,790,000 $0 Difference -$85,650,911 -$591,595 -$85,059,316 Notes: revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases. The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. Table 5-ES-3: Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues Note: Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds accord- ing to Ordinance No. 2013-68; revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases 2The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projec- tions have been made for years after 2030. 5-E-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15.0 5.0.7 2000 & 2019 Plan Comparison Table 5-ES-4 assists in comparing the 2000 Plan to the amended Redevelopment Area Plan, showing a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel, were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives, the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, & Open Space; Development; Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability; Infrastructure; and Process. As a result, the amended Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: • A focus on the CRA-owned 17-Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA area redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements Table S-ES-4: Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements Triangle- Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant; CRA-owned (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Office received PUD zoning for Mixed -Use project. Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3.6); general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Triangle —Flex Current mix of commercial and industrial Office/ uses. Warehouse Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3.6), general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-E-14 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 5-ES-4 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Catalyst Redevelopment Projects (Continued) Identified as an opportunity for new tenancy in Gulfgate Plaza currently has tenants; consideration second floor space and to incentivize optimal Town Center needs to be given to type of establishments tenant mix and walkable design; Courthouse desired for this space. A small business incubator (Gulfgate Plaza) might be a good use for vacant office on second Shadows is another large commercial space providing a redevelopment opportunity (Section floor. 5.3.4) Three60 Market has been established west of Recommendations made to evaluate LDC Entertainment bridge and south of creek; food truck park recently changes to facilitate commercial development Center opened on north side of creek under same such as that in the Bayshore area (Section (Haldeman ownership as Three60 Market. Need for 5.3.4); commercial parking solutions explored Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in (Section 5.3.5, Section 5.4) this area. Neighborhood Focus Initiatives Shadowlawn The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • New general housing and affordable housing • Rehabilitation of affordable housing • Neighborhood gateway features • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for improved internal circulation Current status: The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to recession, warranting prioritization of current study and improvement implementation approach for area. However, some stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood enhancement focused on structural upgrades, limiting uses incompatible with the redevelopment vision, transitions between uses/intensities, infill development on vacant lots, addressing flooding/drainage, and complete streets/transportation improvements that will address streetscape elements such as lighting and traffic calming. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include gateway design and coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. 5-E-15 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Table S-ES-4: Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Bayshore Neighborhood Focus Initiatives (Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • Landscaping and beautification along Bayshore Drive • New affordable housing • Rehabilitation of market -rate and affordable housing • Botanical Gardens relocation • Design of new neighborhood park and connection to Sugden Park site • Sabal Bay development (pending legal actions) Current related efforts include: • Beautification and roadway improvements planned for Hamilton Ave and Thomasson Dr, funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Additional stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). • Residential units have been built; substandard housing has been demolished. CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this neighborhood split into North and South. North focus: commercial/catalyst site development, parking, arts and culture, transition between residential and commercial, residential infill, comprehensive street improvements that will address elements such as streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections (Sugden Regional Park). South focus: residential upgrades and affordability, residential infill, park access (East Naples Community Park, Bayview Park), wetlands/ flooding considerations, roadway standards. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include additional street/transportation improvements to address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, as well as coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See Section 5.3 for more information. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-E-16 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 5-ES-4 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan General Infrastructure Improvements Need for stormwater improvements identified for entire CRA area, so planning and improvement efforts have included both Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, Triangle including the following: Stormwater • Stormwater plan created for Gateway Recommendation made to update stormwater Management Triangle residential area in 2009 and for management plan for the entire CRA area (Section Mana g 5.3.6) Plan Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. Depth assessment will be conducted for creek, Haldeman and capital reserves currently being Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and accumulated for future maintenance or improvements of the MSTUs, including that used to dredge efforts. Advisory Board voted to Canal System increase millage rate to create dredging plan maintain Haldeman Creek, in a Capital Improvements Dredging Plan when major dredge will be needed; the Plan (Section 5.3.7). millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20, 2018. Roadway Improvements US 41 Zoning Resurfacing and certain safety improvements Recommendation to coordinate on future Overlay and currently programmed in FDOT Transportation improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Landscaping Program. Improvement Pro p g community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Davis Boulevard Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT Recommendation to coordinate on future Streetlighting Transportation Improvement Program improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets and Zoning projects. improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Overlay • Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore Recommendation included to make Complete Streets and Thomasson as a Bayshore comprehensive roadway improvements along Bayshore Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU project. Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground Landscaping • Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for streetscape and roadway updates via the overhead utilities (see Section 5.3.5, Section 5.3.6, and Bayshore Beautification MSTU. capital funding in Section 5.4). Other TIF-Funded Projects Botanical Gardens Support Botanical Gardens is now located southwest of the Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive intersection. The CRA currently owns the 17.89-acre site ("17-Acre Site') west of Sugden Regional Park; the site is targeted for catalyst development. Specific planning tasks included for the 17-Acre Site that highlight in particular connections to Sugden Regional Park and a performance space (see Section 5.3.4 and capital and non -capital improvements in Section 5.4). 5-E-17 I Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 I or K. 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 Vision The 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan provides an updated vision and approach for the redevelopment of the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area in Collier County (see Map 5-1-1). The Plan brings together information gathered from technical analysis, 5.1.2 Process The technical analysis involved in the Redevelopment Area Plan process included a review of the existing plans related to the CRA area, as well as spatial and quantitative analysis of data related to the CRA area. The study team also conducted fieldwork to collect fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach additional information and "ground -truth" findings in (documented in further detail in a separate the data. The public and agency outreach consisted of Assessment Memo). From these efforts and the stakeholder and agency meetings and calls, two public resulting themes identified, an overarching vision workshops, and a boat tour of Haldeman Creek and emerged for the future of the CRA area: adjacent canal areas. Figure 5-1-1 illustrates the • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Promote quality of life and economic vitality with a mixed -income, urban, multi -modal community that welcomes visitors, cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, uplifts unique local destinations, and finds balance with the natural environment. complete planning process. 5.1.3 Plan Organization The remaining sections of this Plan cover the following topics: • Section 5.2: Background — historical overview of the CRA area, including the original 2000 CRA Plan and status update • Section 5.3: Plan Framework & Elements — This vision provides the guidance for the overall framework and projects laid out in this Redevelopment Area Plan for furthering the revitalization of the CRA area. This Plan is meant to provide a palette of options, generated by the • technical analysis, fieldwork observations, and public and agency outreach, that the CRA can further explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will necessarily be carried through to full implementation. • Full implementation of framework strategies and projects will be based on further study of capacity, technical feasibility, and public priorities. • framework of goals, objectives, and strategies related to redevelopment in the CRA area, with supporting information on existing conditions, opportunities, and approaches for carrying out strategies Section 5.4: Prioritization Plan — information on revenues; capital project funding and phasing; and planning, administrative, and regulatory initiatives Section 5.5: General Requirements — information on additional regulatory requirements for the CRA Plan and conclusion Section 5.6: Tax Increment & MSTU Estimates — provides methodology and underlying assumptions for tax increment and Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) revenues. 5-1-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 INTRODUCTION 5.1 -:- - I I 1 . . p .. :.I 1 �fJ BARRIETT-AVE 1� I Q O _ N kV6 1- - Sugden Regional Park IL Er Ctty,of Nap!'es A _ w THOMASSON-DR _ i f o f ' o KA7RENDR J Naples East Naples'`. Cammllnl :. ._..?M. ! ¢ Botanical atu ._::.:. ' ;_ ul " = Park _ �- Garden - IL .. ❑CRA Boundary .:_._: - - Collier County Government Center , u r - .- ANDREWS AVE y a City of Naples within CRA _ r Park i,.yl;..yl,, Wetlands .... J City of Naples - L� :::_�_ � '.::__._:• �. � �::15- .::::_: ,. :::::_' fir'.::__ ,• u.Vcr.:::_:�" '.::_. _`.�s�lu. �:::.:: _::' �Ver_.:::_r._:' .atl.[f �.4Y.. :. _:-' � - - •��.� .yi,:...4 U1 #S Map 5-1-1: Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Are Plan —May 2019 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Event No. of People 2 Public Workshops 80+ Feb -June 2018 5 Stakeholder 50+ Meetings Assessment Technical Analysis 4 Agency Meetings 20 Fieldwork Public Outreach 6 Stakeholder 10 Fiscal Analysis & Capital Planning Interviews/Tours r� June-Sept2018 �~ �v Plan & Amendments Preparation Draft Updated CRA Plan ' Draft Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Amendment Recommendations Community Forum y. i Oct 2018-Jan 2019 Plan & Amendments Approval Updated CRA Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Amendment Recommendations Review o11 ,IIIIIflI BACKGROUND 5.2.1 Creation of the CRA Area CRA area. In addition to the Land Use Plan, the 2000 Plan provided an Urban Design Framework to illustrate the following: The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area is located 1 primarily in unincorporated Collier County to the southeast of the city of Naples (a small portion of the area is in the city of Naples; see Map 5-1-1). It is near the popular destinations of Downtown Naples and coastal beaches and is bisected by US 41, a major regional thoroughfare. This corridor defines two major sub -areas within the larger CRA boundary --the Gateway Triangle community north of US 41 and the Bayshore community south of US 41 (see Map 5-1-1 for CRA area and Resolution 2000-82, Exhibit A at end of this document for a legal description of the CRA boundary). The CRA was created in 2000 under the jurisdiction of Collier County to facilitate the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the community. Its creation was based on documenting conditions of blight in a Finding of Necessity study, as required by Florida Statute 163.340. Table 5-2-1 provides an overview of the findings. 5.2.2 2000 Plan Goals and Projects The 2000 Plan laid out visual concept goals and corresponding redevelopment projects to improve conditions in the CRA area. The projects were planned out in phases over a 20-year time span. Map 5-2-1 shows the overall Land Use Plan illustrating general land uses and significant activity centers. The Land Use Plan suggested a basic regulatory framework that would guide Future Land Use Map and zoning amendments to support the redevelopment of the 2 3 Primary areas anticipated to undergo significant change via redevelopment or infill development, receive improvements via neighborhood improvement strategies, or remain as stable and planned development areas Basic site design conditions recommended to implement the vision defined in the public outreach process Primary corridors and areas recommended for landscape/streetscape improvements in support of the vision defined in the public outreach The primary areas anticipated to undergo significant change included: • Triangle area approximately defined by US 41, Davis Blvd, and a line based on the projected alignment of Pine St to the north of US 41 • Naples Plaza (southwest of Davis Blvd and US 41 intersection) and adjacent properties • Gulfgate Plaza as a Town Center • Commercial uses on Naples Steel properties (along US 41) and other properties on Gulfgate • Residential uses south and west of Gulfgate • Infill: • Multi- and single-family residential in Shadowlawn neighborhood • Commercial uses for Haldeman Creek entertainment center • Mixed multi -family and commercial uses along Bayshore Drive north of Lake View (Lakeview) Dr • Residential and commercial at Bay Center '000 5-2-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 BACKGROUND 5.2 Inadequate street layout and design (including sub -standard street widths) • Shadowlawn Dr • Thomasson Dr • Most local streets • Davis Blvd • Airport Rd Commercial parking problems 0 Bayshore Rd • US 41 Predominance of defective or Major arterials inadequate street layout Lack of streetlights along major Most local streets arterial and most local streets Davis Blvd • Shadowlawn Dr Lack of sidewalks Bayshore Rd south of Thomasson Rd • Most local streets Lack of neighborhood connections 9 Residential neighborhoods • US 41 Commercial lots 0 Davis Blvd Faulty lot layout in relation to size, • Between Pine St and US 41 adequacy, accessibility, or Built density far below approved 0 RMF-6 residences in Gateway usefulness density Triangle area Not meeting lot standards in at 0 RMF-6 residential properties least one respect 0 Bayshore area residences Disproportionate lack of plumbing Unsanitary or unsafe conditions Disproportionate overcrowding 2 unsafe structures Lack of sidewalks and streetlights Poor drainage of local roads, Deterioration of site or other surface water management improvements problems Lack of right-of-way for improvements along Shadowlawn Dr No public transportation provided Other problems in CRA area Housing affordability noted as an issue in the county and as an issue that could get worse in the CRA area Table 5-2-1: Findings of Blighted Conditions in CRA Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-2-2 5.2 1 BACKGROUND area (Bayshore and Thomasson) • Other opportunities in the Medium Intensity residential area of Land Use Plan The public outreach of the 2000 Plan defined the establishment of a Neighborhood Focus Initiative as a programmatic objective. The aim of such a program was "to coordinate the direction of a variety of public and quasi -public services to enhance major residential portions of the project area." The primary neighborhoods for improvements specified in the 2000 Plan included: • Bayshore • Shadowlawn The primary areas for stability and planned development with low -intensity residential included: • Windstar • Sabal Bay (Hamilton Bay) development Site design standards included: • Roof patterns reflective of Old Florida architectural style • Placement of buildings close to street to support pedestrian activity • Use of rectilinear block pattern to strengthen predominant established character of area • Placement of parking to rear of development sites The following lays out items covered by the visual preference statement from the public outreach effort of the 2000 Plan, which supported the design standards: • Buildings — representing an "Old Florida" or "Cracker" style with covered porches, metal roof, and dormers • Signage — representing low, monument -style sign with business logogram (representative sign or character) suppressed to design of sign's background and surrounding landscape planting • Pathways — representing sidewalk set back from curb by distance greater than width of walk and with planting materials and low pedestrian lighting provided between walk and curb • On -Street Parking— representing street with narrow planted median and use of angle parking interspersed with planting areas on both sides of street • Landscaping — representing street with landscaped median and landscaping and decorative lighting fixtures on edges • Public Spaces — representing pedestrian area with palms and large pool with water jet fountain In terms of landscape and streetscape improvements, the design framework focused on: • Treatments for major roadways, including: • Davis Blvd • Airport Pulling Rd • US 41 • Bayshore Dr • Thomasson Dr Significant gateway intersection designs at intersections of the above streets as well as: • Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis and North of US 41 • Linwood Ave at Airport Pulling Rd • Pelton Ave north of US 41 • Intersection proposed at time of Sabal Bay's main east/west street with Bayshore Dr 5-2-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 BACKGROUND 5.2 ILI_ Naples Steel Site l I i11—it. Shadowlawn Neighborhood CoderOuurAyCo mmirw1on Caber Courrtyr Flenning ILLU� fiFl V114+ 1 ovelop gent Plan Land Use: Tomm oe r /bode i'r�ev�fine�t f = Act" Canl*m f Fbfpnel htaJet hdCd& le � E�Ip�r3dm�rrt . G� Bayshore Gb9rirrierded Neighborhood. . • aarr,[rtm6eraiYri7 cormMidyl A�.alcn L.uro RCS. Offkxd l L'+hmCrG81ow Windstar Modklm lntarltih' — �- Ft�ldentl� - Lo,Y In'�na I �dat :. Bcbrrkml Garden,' Avalon Like Park I Bayshore Neighborhood CxNernnwt Sabal Bay Map 5-2-1: Land Use Plan from 2000 CRA Plan Note: Additional labels have been added to clarify location of certain sites and neighborhoods. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5.2 BACKGROUND Table 5-2-2 provides a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel, were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives, the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, & Open Space; Development; Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability; Infrastructure; and Process. As a result, the updated Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: • A focus on the CRA-owned 17-Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Triangle- Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant; CRA-owned Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and Office received PUD zoning for Mixed -Use project. Triangle — Flex Current mix of commercial and industrial Office/ Warehouse uses. Gulfgate Plaza currently has tenants; Town Center consideration needs to be given to type of (Gulfgate Plaza) establishments desired for this space. A small business incubator might be a good use for vacant office on second floor. Table 5-2-2: Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3.6); general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3.6); general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Identified as an opportunity for new tenancy in second floor space and to incentivize optimal tenant mix and walkable design; Courthouse Shadows is another large commercial space providing a redevelopment opportunity (Section 5.3.4) 5-2-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 BACKGROUND 5.2 Catalyst Redevelopment Projects (Continued) Three60 Market has been established west of Recommendations made to evaluate LDC Entertainment bridge and south of creek; food truck park recently changes to facilitate commercial development Center opened on north side of creek under same such as that in the Bayshore area (Section (Haldeman ownership as Three60 Market. Need for commercial parking solutions explored Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in (Section on 5.3.5, Section 5.4) (Sects; this area. Neighborhood Focus Initiative The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • New general housing and affordable housing • Rehabilitation of affordable housing • Neighborhood gateway features • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for Shadowlawn improved internal circulation Current status: The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to recession, warranting prioritization of current study and improvement implementation approach for area. However, some stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood enhancement focused on structural upgrades, limiting uses incompatible with the redevelopment vision, transitions between uses/intensities, infill development on vacant lots, addressing flooding/drainage, and complete streets/transportation improvements that will address streetscape elements such as lighting and traffic calming. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include gateway design and coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. Table 5-2-2 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-2-6 5.2' BACKGROUND Bayshore Neighborhood Focus Initiatives (Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • Landscaping and beautification along CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Bayshore Drive Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this • New affordable housing • Rehabilitation of market -rate and affordable housing • Botanical Gardens relocation • Design of new neighborhood park and connection to Sugden Park site • Sabal Bay development (pending legal actions) Current related efforts include: • Beautification and roadway improvements planned for Hamilton Ave and Thomasson Dr, funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Additional stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). • Residential units have been built; substandard housing has been demolished. neighborhood split into North and South. North focus: commercial/catalyst site development, parking, arts and culture, transition between residential and commercial, residential infill, comprehensive street improvements that will address elements such as streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections (Sugden Regional Park). South focus: residential upgrades and affordability, residential infill, park access (East Naples Community Park, Bayview Park), wetlands/ flooding considerations, roadway standards. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include additional street/transportation improvements to address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, as well as coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See Section 5.3 for more information. Table 5-2-2 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 5-2-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 BACKGROUND 5.2 2000 Plan St L j 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Projects IL Infrastructure Improvements Need for stormwater improvements identified for entire CRA area, so planning and improvement efforts have included both Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, Triangle including the following: Recommendation made to update stormwater Stormwater • Stormwater plan created for Gateway management plan for the entire CRA area (Section Management Triangle residential area in 2009 and for 5.3.6) Plan Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. Depth assessment will be conducted for Haldeman creek, and capital reserves currently being Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and accumulated for future maintenance or improvements of the MSTUs, including that used to Canal System dredge efforts. Advisory Board voted to maintain Haldeman Creek, in a Capital Improvements Dredging Plan increase millage rate to create dredging plan Plan (Section 5.3.7). when major dredge will be needed; the millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20, 2018. Roadway Improvements US 41 Zoning Resurfacing and certain safety improvements Recommendation to coordinate on future Overlay and currently programmed in FDOT improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Landscaping Transportation Improvement Program. community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Davis Recommendation to coordinate on future Boulevard Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Streetlighting Transportation Improvement Program community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets and Zoning projects. improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Overlay • Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore Recommendation included to make Complete Streets and Thomasson as a Bayshore comprehensive roadway improvements along Bayshore Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU project. Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground Landscaping • Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for overhead utilities (see Section 5.3.5, Section 5.3.6, and streetscape and roadway updates via the capital funding in Section 5.4). Bayshore Beautification MSTU. OtherTIF-Funded Projects Botanical Gardens is now located southwest Specific planning tasks included for the 17-Acre Site Botanical of the Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive that highlight in particular connections to Sugden Gardens intersection. The CRA currently owns the Regional Park and a performance space (see Section Support 17.89-acre site ("17-Acre Site') west of 5.3.4 and capital and non -capital improvements in Sugden Regional Park; the site is targeted for Section 5.4). catalyst development. Table 5-2-2 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-2-8 5.2' BACKGROUND Section 5.2.3 and Sections 5.3 and 5.4 provide more • Stimulating investment and capitalizing on information on these additional considerations and their development opportunities while also providing basis. support and protections for existing residents • Navigating various perceptions of and visions for the area and incorporating arts and culture into the 5.2.3 Bayshore Gateway vision; marketing this vision Triangle CRA 2019 Perspective Many of the challenges and efforts identified in the 2000 Plan are still relevant today. The following are some of the major ideas emerging from the Redevelopment Area Plan update process, which provided the basis for the goals, objectives, and strategies underlying the framework (see Section 5.3) for this Redevelopment Area Plan: • Improving the compatibility of uses and appearance of the public realm • Transitioning between suburban and urban development style • Balancing regional vs. local transportation needs and related transportation safety concerns along major roadways, incorporating a focus on multi - modal transportation • Developing in the context of natural conditions and hazards (wetlands, Coastal High Hazard Area, flooding), including how to address increased density/intensity • Capitalizing on the valuable assets of the area or nearby, including parks, natural areas such as the canal system and Naples beaches, proximity to Downtown Naples, and tourism while also creating public spaces that can be claimed by the community Transition between higher -density multifamily housing and lower -density single-family housing Artistic and cultural elements of the CRA area include murals 5-2-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 .,t vss � ^r 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. 5-3-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Public Space, Parks, & Open Space Complete Streets & Trail (Neighborhood) Triangle Retention Pond Improvements Jeepers Dr. ®�- A ,'® '� a ® I=�=•=1—�—I—ate e4y w I' ' i•' 5.3.1 Conceptual Plan Diagram The planning framework and elements cover a broad range of themes that make up the overall redevelopment approach. Figure 5-3-1 provides a Concept Plan illustrating aspects of the framework through future land use and capital improvements with associated goals that are more capital intensive, including Land Use & Design; Public Space Parks, & Open Space; Development; Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability; and Infrastructure. See the map legend on the following page for project descriptions, additional capital improvements without specified locations at this time, and future land use details. The reminder of this chapter provides lays out the framework in more detail by goal. Note that "Major Corridors" are based on highways, minor arterials, and major arterials in the CRA area. AIRPORT PULLING RD r ■ y J o � 1,Tt1 BAYSHORE DR Sao j,./, �3 j r i. Complete Streets (Major) Linwood Ave liii icier J�� Figure 5-3-1: Redevelopment Concept � r0 N C Y 'p O i bn v li 1 3 X Monument Sign for Gateway Intersection US 41 and Bayshore Dr. ' ' ' ' Focus Corridor Major Corridor Land Use & Design Public Space, Parks, & Open Development Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability c • Infrastructure act ;i S rLk� Z E M H. •ii i ji .:i- . V/X�'10 NDL0IU Complete S7reets(Major) Bayshore Dr. - US 41 to Thomosson Dr. #�#M_ >' a M - m a 0 rw # CRA Boundary Future Land Use QBayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Incorporated Area Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict ® Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Park Wetlands L City of Naples Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-2 MI This page is intentionally left blank. h-3-3 \ 0ayshore Gateway Tnangle MI ea Plan —May 2019 5.3I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Location -Specific Capital Projects OGateway ln[er[ttllon Design A. Davis Blvtl/Abpon Pulling Rd Improvements B. Davu&vtl/Sbatlowlawn Dr C Davis all 41 D. US 61/Bayshore or E. momasson Ducommmn or E Ds 61/0sesola Ave © Development Projects A. Development of king Purpose Fachly/Structure © Parks improvements A_ Triangle Rdentlon Pond Improvements O Complete Streets(Major) A Dnwood Rre—Pbasel B. SbatlowNwn Ave C Borehole Di al/lnomasson or D. momasson Dr/xamikon Ave E. Commercial or F grkwootl Are/prkwoatl Ave Connection G. Pine 4 COnntt9on Complete Streets&Trail A_ Birytle/PedeAnan Trail (Neighborhood) B. lrepersIX C Dnwaotl Are —Phase 11 D. Republic or E. Deal F. Bay St G. Borehole Dr —Thomason Dr/Hdly Ave Q Parking A. Surface/garage parking —Mini Triangle area B. Surface/garage parlang—Bayshore area C Car/boat parking—Barylew Park area Road Engineering A_ Rne Tree Dr QGeneral Sturman improarements B. Andrews Ave C WaWsNe Ave D. Tony Ave E. Palmettoa Infrastructure A. Dndergmund/Relora(e Overhead Ratty tines—tinwmtl Ave and Commercial or B. Underground/Relocate Overhead Ratty tines—Bayshore or 5-34 gayshore Gateway Tnangle CRAArea Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Non -Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Project Name Public Space, Parks, & Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition & Development B. General Parks Improvements C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation, Connectivity, & A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements D. General Multi -Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines Non -Capital Projects 0General market study/economic profile Projects and initiatives that are not capital 0 Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical investments include a variety of plans, studies, and feasibility grant programs in support of redevelopment or . Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project capital project planning throughout the CRA area. These non -capital projects and initiatives include: 0Triangle retention pond improvements CRA operating expenditures and administrative 0Micro-enterprise and arts incubator updates Grants and funding programs, including: Land Development Code updates • Residential improvements grants/loans Development support for catalyst development sites 0 Commercial fagade improvements Master planning for: 0 Wall and fence funding for areas with • Stormwater improvements incompatible uses • Arts— and culture -oriented development and 0Public art funding redevelopment efforts 0 Economic development incentives • Implementation of Complete Streets projects • Mobile home replacements • Community safety and clean-up • Community Land Trust housing construction • Branding 0 Other affordable/workforce housing investments • Marketing and communications Other non -capital expenditures that may arise in the • Water and fire infrastructure improvements future and are not yet identified Feasibility studies, including: Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-5 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Future Land Use Densities The following table shows Future Land Use densities corresponding to designations on the Concept Map (Figure 5-3-1). Note that certain projects in the Redevelopment Overlay are eligible for additional units from a pool of 388; these units are referred to as "density pool units" below. Also note that the entire CRA area lies in the Coastal High Hazard Area, which deducts one unit per gross acre (UPGA) from the eligible base density of four units per acre (UPA) and does not permit rezones for mobile home development. A. Mixed Use—Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Overlay Mixed Use Activity Center B. Residential—Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Overlay; 16 UPGA for area outside of overlay 12 UPA via density pool units (with cap of 97 density pool units per project); limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase. The Mini Triangle Catalyst Site is an exception with a maximum of 12 UPA and is not subject to the density pool unit requirements. Within this site, there is a Mini -Triangle Subdistrict that was approved through Ordinance No. 2018-23 which amended the Growth Redevelopment Overlay— Management Plan and Ordinance No. 2018-25 which amended the Land Development Properties with access to US 41 Code creating the Mini -Triangle MPUD to allow for construction of up to, with a mix to East/Bayshore Dr/Davis Blvd (84)/ be determined by maximum allowable traffic generation, the following development west side of Airport -Pulling Rd' plan: • 377 multi -family dwelling units • 228 hotel suites • 150 assisted living units • 200,000 square feet of commercial uses inclusive of 60,000 square feet of self - storage and 30,000 square feet of car dealership Residential only: 8 UPA via use of density bonus pool (with cap of 97 density pool units Redevelopment Overlay— per project). Eligibility requires that the project: Properties having frontage on 1. shall be a Planned Unit Development (PUD) one or more of Bayshore Drive, 2. shall be a minimum of 3 acres Davis Boulevard, Airport- Pulling 3. shall be redevelopment of a site Road (west side only) or US 41 4. consist of all market -rate units Eastz Limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase. Urban Residential Subdistrict Maximum residential density determined through Collier County's Density Rating (outside Redevelopment Overlay) System, but shall not exceed 16 UPA except in accordance with Transfers of Development Rights in the Land Development Code. To facilitate hurricane evacuation and protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area, residential densities within the Subdistrict shall not Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict exceed a maximum of 4 UPA, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 (outside of Redevelopment UPA through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfers of Development Rights, and Overlay) except as allowed by certain Future Land Use Element Policies under Objective 5 in the Growth Management Plan. New rezones to permit mobile home development within this Subdistrict are prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a PUD. 'This definition is interpreted broadly to mean properties that can gain access to the road(s), whether directly (access point on the road) or via one or more other roads; it is not viewed narrowly to mean have an access point onto the rood(s). As a result, this definition encompasses all properties in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay except those on east side of Airport Road. 2According to Collier County Growth Management staff, such properties must literally have frontage on (abut) one or more of the specified roads. 5-3-6 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 5.3.2 Land Use & Urban Design The Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code (LDC) provide tools to shape land use and urban design, which have a direct impact on the built environment of an area. This section highlights existing conditions related to various land use types, as well as ways to promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 0 (a GOAL ......... Promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-7 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Existing Residential Land Use Characteristics The CRA area has 3,814, dwelling units according to Florida Department of Revenue 2017 data. These units include a range of housing types from mobile to larger single-family to multi -family homes (see Map 5-3-2 and corresponding images). This diversity of types, when coupled with a range of price points, can accommodate a diversity of residents living in the community. Currently, streets such as Jeepers Drive (picture 3 below) show areas of transition between larger residential and smaller residential, as well as between smaller single-family residential and multi -family on nearby streets. The vision set forth in the Redevelopment Area Plan aims to guide these transitions towards the desired built environment character laid out for different sub -areas (see Section 5.3.8). Mobile home Small single-family near large new single-family with guest house Single-family housing Gated community housing 5 6 i PIP - a ' Small multifamily housing Multifamily housing 5-3-8 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 I '■ � - •anmm� s /1 ■�� I i r•mm w■ .� 1■ i■11111■ =I■II■ 1 ► 1 •Wool�� jam 1111111111 nnl7r Illoil■ � ■■ _ fill EP ® ■In■ ® ■11■ii o _�1 III i � ° ■ '�'' IIII Illlll 11111111111■I • _ _ ill / ■11■ IIII■.■� : it 11 � � / � 1 nnn111■■ ■■11111111■1111111■ III ■11■Illlll= ■-nn■�■■■ , IIII■I■11■Illlll ■111111111■II■1■11 nnmm�nnnnmun � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ���°��°���°°°��rr. Illlll►��� 11111111111111�11 Ui .��° __ p'Ill. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII► +� ; _; _. o .�11�■-• • 111111111. �_ � IIII■. oil I' = oil, 'I 6 I !— ,III IIII � li jj ■ 11■II 1 f� �pQ�;�•';��I ■ . I■IIIII■IIII Illlll Naples _nnnl■I■1°mm�ii Botanicall ■ • ii crt ary�, 1 ■III■IIIIIIIIII I■ 11 1 IIII 1-� � a��� , A 1■ IIIII 11111� J ■1■11� = - ■111'•;i1119 Illiill7:7 _ 111111111111■■■II■ ® �■I■11 1111111111111 - ■ II■Illllll�il12111111 1 , II„IIII - I ,II Illlll= _ ,r at, ice; l Map 5-3-2: Existing Residential Land Use Characteristics; Data source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-9 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS .................................... Existing Commercial & Industrial Land Use Characteristics As with housing types, there are a range of commercial types in the CRA area (see Map 5-3-3 and corresponding images). Many commercial sites include on -site, street -facing surface parking. The area contains two major mall -style commercial spaces, Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows. Uses range from restaurants and retail stores to heavier uses such as auto services. Industrial uses are also present in the Triangle area and northwest of Sugden Park. New neighborhood commercial on Bayshore Drive— Three60 Market Mall commercial —Courthouse Shadows Multi -story strip commercial Mall commercial—Gulfgate Plaza Linwood Avenue commercial Vertical mixed -use 5-3-10 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 :•.::.._;:��=�`:_. III � `< .� N 129 DA VD 84 WOOD AVE �I ■ • do INWOOD AVE z� 90 41 BARRET AVE ." s i S Sugden O ,qR\ m = Regional Park or THOMASSON D' KAREN DR N0 VacantNon-Residential `'' ' �� East Napl __ _ _ ..•; Naples Commercial Community = Botanical _ — i� park � Industrial a Institutional . Naples Botanical Garden ' Pk _.. :.._: County i ... i State :.lti Naples ppaUEc ANDREWS = Utility/Other /Other .._....:.... .: ..... _:_ ..• ukt .. vltc : D CRA Boundary - .. � i:r_c" � .._._. �: • �allti iirr ,i; ,..ltt. .... .. Park i, •...._ ... .::. ... ::. •-•• .. ... _ _. Wetlands - .. City of Naples ...::=• ...._ �l,ti. i::::-: ��� _... .:::_c: •• ' ..._....: L.:.. :__: ' .r,.l�.. -_ - c:_- Yalu_ iii :._ ..i..: ._.. ' ....r ;`•';...._..• ..:.. UUr':' .. ,;.: _.:.. 17.. UIIr •: ::: .�Ai�' :`'�iVr :::. Ir _. _. fit.:::_' _ .._._. -:. :_. -:.. � -•: _- �a4rt �: a.Si: ,: . _r ulir. Map 5-3-3: Commercial & Industrial Land Use Characteristics with Non -Residential Existing Land Use; Data source: 2017 Florida Deportment of Reve- nue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-11 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS .................................... Existing Community -Oriented Uses Community -oriented uses support community -building and provide services via government, faith -based, non-profit, and other entities. The Redevelopment Area Plan aims to preserve and enhance these uses. Government establishments in the area include the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area office, a Naples Fire Rescue station, and the County Center (see Map 5-3-4 and corresponding images). Schools in and near the area include Avalon Elementary, Shadowlawn Elementary, and The Garden School of Naples (a Montessori school). There are also various arts -oriented spaces, places of worship, and non-profit service providers. Evaluating locations for a library or other public meeting space can also facilitate the addition of community services and spaces. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Office Lid Opera Naples Greater Naples Fire Rescue —Station #22 Avalon Elementary School East Naples Baptist Church Catholic Charities 1\ 5-3-12 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 7 -t5AKK,- 1-1- Sugden Regional Park T OMASSO 7_7 ....... Vacant Non —K-ARENI-DR , [ .:A, . -Residential .....5 7. Naples commercial OMMU Industrial rk en a Institutional Bay.... ...... WW Naples Botanical Garden Park ■......... County I J& ...... State Naples Utility/Oth -:A ANDREWS AVE er -k Xv. 144 T .. ... 13CRA Boundary ........ ....... 4? M1 a Park 7, Wetlands A, . ..... City of Naples X . 7.7711" I .5w . . ... 7_7 .. .. ..... AV Map 5-3-4: Community Oriented Land Use Characteristics with Non -Residential Existing Land Use; Data source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 r �5-3-13 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 1: Promote urban -style development. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Growth Management and Zoning Divisions to pilot innovative land use and zoning approaches to promote more urban -style development in the LDC. These approaches might include: • Increasing mixed use designations • Focus increased densities/intensities along improved roadways (with consideration of Coastal High Hazard Area restrictions) • Roadway design standards to support multi -modal transportation (see Section 5.3.5) • Reduced building setbacks • Zoning for live/work spaces • Zoning and incentives for accessory dwelling units • Flexible parking regulations • Strategy 2: In awarding density pool units, establish eligibility requirements and/or performance metrics that promote these urban approaches. 5-3-14 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• a ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Character Images Naples Beach and Bay Realty i Local Mix Use Promote use of guest houses (shown here in back of main house) as a way to provide additional density and potentially address affordability Local multifamily housing styles Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 �/ �5-3-15 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 2: Achieve consistent land uses in the CRA area and sub -areas. • Strategy 1: Use sub -area ("Character Area") characteristics (see Section 5.3.8) to guide land use vision in the CRA area. • Strategy 2: Amend the LDC to limit heavy commercial and manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses throughout the CRA area; evaluate incentives to encourage transitions away from heavy commercial and manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses. • Strategy 3: Identify elements in the LDC to create clear transitional areas and land use buffers between uses that are incompatible (see Figure 5-3-2); coordinate buffers with related improvements, such as landscaping improvements via the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Strategy 4: Provide funding through CRA-funded grant programs for transitional structures (e.g., walls and fences) between incompatible uses. Provide guidance in the program guidelines to coordinate with related elements, such as design standards and Bayshore Beautification MSTU improvements. • Strategy S: Provide clear guidance in the LDC for new and emerging uses to ensure consistency with the respective Character Areas. 5-3-16 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 •••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••• a ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Land Use Transition Types There are four main types of land use strategies to transition between differing land use types (Figure 5-3-2). Factors affecting use of any given type might include characteristics of the particular site or the general Character Area. RIIII nnup � I I i i i u•i iii i� i ■ 1 i i i �■� �1 Residential Coniniercial DADI/INC I nT/1 AmnCPADC ±Drrni rnorni ennrr �■91 Residentiol INTENSITY OF USE rMMf Residential Figure 5-3-2: Land Use Transition Types Noturol Feotures Public Squore Mixed -Use/ ti Neighborhood Commercial Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 Mixed -flip/ Commercial �5-3-17 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS © RECOMMENDATIONS Needed Land Use Transitions: Uses Elements to facilitate transitions can be helpful where there are dissimilar uses, built forms, or development styles. Strategies range from land use buffers (e.g., gradual transition in density/intensity, open space buffers; see Figure 5-3-2), physical barriers (e.g, walls, fences, landscaping), or limitations placed on uses incompatible with the area's land use vision. Map 5-3-5 shows the generalized base zoning districts, highlighting areas with use boundaries that might benefit from transition strategies. The highlighted areas are described further below. Focus: transition from interior residential area of Triangle to the major commercial corridors surrounding it 0 Strategies: • Put in place land use transition areas of lighter commercial or multi -family residential near single- family residential areas • Promote use of physical barriers/buffers between heavier commercial uses and residential uses • Limit heavier industrial and commercial uses in the Triangle area Focus: transition from commercial to residential and between different residential densities Strategies: © • Establish land use transition areas to transition from commercial and denser multi -family along Bayshore Drive to moderately dense multi -family residential to single-family residential Focus: put in place transition strategies to mesh new development coming online with existing uses Strategies: © • Establish land use transition areas 5-3-18 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 il N A L_ -1 Ej I T 1-7- E A&' L -_7 Sugden Regional M Park THOM Commercial 0 ... ... .... KUM City of Naples Mobile Home Botanical MPUD PUD Residential Multi -Family Res. PUD MU Res. Subdist Pa Single -Family Residential Village Residential * ..... ..... . Property Parcel Ak. CRA Boundary Park 7 -AIA. d, Wetlands ....... City of Naples A&. A& A& ....... . k 7, • ...... :.qj. Aj 711 1, ': -::" - '_' .... 7 .-H n 7 D&7" Map 5-3-5: Needed Land Use Transitions with Base Zoning Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 RP 5 -3-19 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS V EXISTING CONDITIONS •. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Needed Land Use Transitions: Building Heights Identifying boundaries between different existing zoned building heights can indicate areas where land use transition approaches may be helpful. Map 5-3-6 shows the applicable Mixed Use Overlay Districts that provide more detailed design standards for the CRA area with highlighted transition areas from Map 5-3-4 and maximum zoned heights of buildings in the table below. Note that there are exceptions for certain structures in the code (e.g., church spires, antenna). PUD sites are governed by zoning in their respective ordinances. BMUD-NC 42 42 42 56 56 42 BMUD-W 42 42 42 56 56 42 BMUD-R1 35 35 35 35 BMUD-R2 35 35 35 35 BMUD-R3 35 30 35 35 35 BMUD-R4 35 35 GTMUD-MXD 42 42 42 56 56 42 GTMUD-R 35 35 35 35 ■ ■ ■ ■ i Needed Transition Area 5-3-20 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 A Naples Bay Zoo" ANKA, IL rA ET E LU 0- U-1 tA Sugden Regional Park : . . . . . . . . . . ...... r .3CRA Boundary Park I ... ..... a ZONING Napleslips 10 m E PUD Botani Par Par RMF-6 Garden BMUD-R1 BMUD-R2 Ba ew Y P*k BMUD-R3 7. BMUD-R4 7 BMUD -NC 4& BMUD-W GTMUD-M XD GTMUD-R 5 Wetlands 7., City of Naples ... .. ..... .. 1E ... . ...... m J/z .. .... ... . .... ..... ----iltr-- :.qj. Ai. d 7 j Map 5-3-6. Mixed Use Overlay Districts in the CRA Area j Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-21 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS • Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for arts -oriented code flexibility that will incorporate existing arts activity such as gallery space. Objective 3: Achieve a consistent design character in the CRA area and sub -areas that cultivates the area's unique artistic and cultural identity. • Strategy 1: As part of a CRA-specific Arts and Culture Plan (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, Strategy 5), develop a comprehensive design approach for the public realm with reference to specific Character Areas. The approach might consider: • Architectural styles, including resilient designs that better manage natural hazards such as flooding • Transitional elements between Character Area designs, building mass types, etc. (see Section 5.3.8) • Design considerations for gateway/focus intersections • Design considerations for public art • Identification of public art opportunities and incentives • Design considerations for streetscape improvements in coordination with the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Master Plan • Design considerations for CRA-funded grants for fagade and other exterior improvements • Incorporation of urban -style development design standards (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 1) • Airport Zone height restrictions • Strategy 2: Fund a commercial fagade grant program for exterior improvements to commercial buildings not targeted for major redevelopment. • • • • • • • • • • B ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Character Images for Design Style A number of buildings in the CRA establish a modern architectural style that the CRA can promote in public realm design; there are a number of residences with a more traditional Florida style that the CRA can also promote. Art that is incorporated into private development, but visible in the public realm, can also contribute to the community character conveyed in the physical environment (see the character photos on the facing page). In addition to architectural style, sign styles can be considered as part of public realm design. Figure 5-3-3 provides potential sign design options for the Bayshore neighborhood of the CRA area, reflecting the style of existing infrastructure. The CRA can promote a more modern design for the Triangle area in the commercial areas targeted for redevelopment. 5-3-22 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Local residence with modern design style tea'■ Opera Naples with modern design style Local residential design Figure 5-3-3: Sign Design Examples Modern design of Ankrolob Brewing Co. (Source: Hlevel Architects, http://hlevel.info/project/ankrolab_bre) wing_co/J Local residential design Local residential design BADDITIONAL INFORMATION Modern design of The Garden School (Source: Corban Architecture/Planning/Sustainability, http:// www. davidcorbon. com/the-garden-school/) Local residential design Art in the public realm on Bayshore Dr Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 Tindale>;4Oliver 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 RECOMMENDATIONS Design Treatments & Attributes • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Public realm design in the area is important given the emphasis on arts -oriented development and input from public outreach efforts indicating architectural style as a way of building a sense of place and community. The Bayshore Beautification MSTU has contributed significantly to the design of the southern portion of the CRA area with streetscape improvements including lighting, flags, landscaping, and the design of the Bayshore/Thomasson roundabout. The CRA should coordinate with the MSTU for further improvements, including the design of major gateway intersections that can include signs and public art (see Map 5-3-7 for opportunities). Note that gateway intersection opportunities north of US 41 would not qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds, yet the northern Triangle area can explore the creation of its own MSTU to fund these and other types of improvements (see Section 5.3.7, Objective 3, Strategy 2). Existing gateway design near US 41 and Bayshore Drive E Bayshore Drive/Thomosson Drive roundabout rendering Bayshore Drive flag, lighting, bike lane, landscaping, pavement treatments ■ ■ ■ i MSTU Improvements © Gateway Design Opportunities 5-3-24 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 15.3 N A om ar9� �11::1��-., J& 00! - 000 "0 A 7 THOMASSON DR R 10I Park C= KAREN DR EastNaplesS T.: Naples-- Botanical co a tA& ........ ...... ... . ..... vj 'i' Ga'rd . a —W - r 'P ...... ... .... . .. A.. .... . . .... . ... . ......... NDIEW .. ..i7-:j77 . Property Parcel . . . . . . CRA Boundary .. .. ...... . M& Park SA -,* ......... Wetlands . ...... City of Naples iil A,. fe. .......... :.qj. _.A 7. A - .. M4. Ji 21. . ..... I& vlir Map 5-3-7., Design Treatments & Attributes Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-25 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3.3 Public Space, Parks, & Open Space Public space, parks, and open space types of land use that serve an important community -building purpose with particular design considerations given the variety of activity they can support. This section focuses on how to ensure accessible, activated, and well - maintained public spaces, parks, and open space. ........... 19 GOAL .......... Ensure accessible, activated, and well -maintained public spaces, parks, and open space. �5-3-260000'*0 Pedestrian connection between Bayshore neighborhood and Sugden Regional Park that can serve as an example for additional connections Objective 1: Increase access to parks and public gathering places in the CRA area. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Road Maintenance Division and Parks & Recreation Division to increase the number and quality of bicycle and pedestrian connections 1) between the Bayshore Dr area and neighboring County parks, including Bayview Park, East Naples Community Park, and Sugden Regional Park and 2) running north/south from neighboring County parks to increase accessibility to the Triangle area (see Section 5.3.5, Objective 1, Strategy 6). Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Road Maintenance Division and Parks & Recreation Division in conjunction with Thomasson Ave and Hamilton Ave MSTU improvements to evaluate opportunities for 1) maintaining car and boat parking at Bayview Park and 2) operational maintenance at Bayview Park. • Strategy 3: Coordinate with Collier County Public Services Department to evaluate opportunities for a park and/or public meeting space (e.g., library) in the CRA area. • Strategy 4: Create a site -specific park plan for the existing retention pond in the Triangle area. • Strategy 5: Evaluate opportunities for "pocket parks" (very small neighborhood park spaces). • Strategy 6: Coordinate with Collier County Parks & Recreation Division on any general parks improvements related to CRA development/ redevelopment sites and efforts, including the 17- Acre Site (see Section 5.3.4). Objective 2: Support events in park spaces geared towards the CRA community. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Parks & Recreation Division to promote park spaces as venues for CRA community events. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 U RECOMMENDATIONS Park and Connectivity Design Concepts The potential park design concept shown in Figure 5-3-4 for the Triangle stormwater retention pond is based on previous planning and design efforts for the pond, with more consideration given to increasing visibility to enhance safety in the pond area (a concern mentioned during public outreach). The rendering includes a consideration for identifying sites for consolidated public parking, which may take the form of a garage. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-27 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS •• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Parks & Open Space The Redevelopment Area Plan update process identified parks and open spaces as important community assets, providing event spaces and opportunities to build a sense of place and community. Park access can be improved by providing better connections to parks and capitalizing on opportunities for new parks (such as at the Triangle retention pond and small pocket parks). Expansion of the CRA area to include the parks to the east should also be evaluated since it may facilitate making connections and other improvements. See Map 5-3-8 for existing parks and opportunities. Sugden Regional Park: County park that provides inland water access and water recreation programming. Image source: Collier County Parks & Recreation Division IL - Bayview Park. County park that provides access to Haldeman Creek, the local canals, and the Gulf of Mexico. Haldeman Creek and Canals: provide access to the Bayshore Drive commercial area and the Gulf of Mexico. The Haldeman Creek MSTU funds periodic dredging and maintenance. East Naples Community Park: County park that houses 38 pickleball courts for sports tourism and local recreational use; hosts the annual US Open Pickleball Championship and other pickleball tournaments. Image source: Collier County Parks & Recreation Division Naples Botanical Garden: a non-profit 170-acre botanical garden with over 220,000 visitors per year. Also includes meeting spaces. Park Opportunity at Stormwater Pond: potentia l for design, traffic flow, safety, and flood management improvements. 5-3-28 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 , �� � muouen Regional Park � �� � muouen Regional Park � Communi Property Parcel CRA Boundary Park Wetlands City of Naples 8ayshoreGateway Triangle CRAArea Plan —May 2O19 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 3: Ensure a clean and well maintained public realm. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the Collier County Sheriff's Office, Collier County Code Enforcement Division, service providers in the CRA area, and residents and business owners in the CRA area to develop a proactive community safety and clean-up strategy (inclusive of private property along the canal network) with an aim at reducing reliance on case -by -case enforcement. This effort should focus on residential properties and coordinate with the Community Standards Liaison pilot program of the Collier County Community & Human Services Division. • Strategy 2: Identify and document a strategy for canal maintenance in the right -of way, including seawalls and mangroves, in coordination with the Haldeman Creek MSTU Advisory Board. Table 5-3-1 indicates the amount of parks and open space that are in and bordering the CRA area. �5-3-300000'*0 Total publicly -owned Retention pond site 6.48 open space within CRA (northern Triangle area) (includes pond) area Additional open space or green space in the CRA area Total open space/green space in CRA area Park space adjacent to CRA area Botanical Garden (non-profit owned) I .: 174.48 • Bayview Park 6.27 • East Naples Community Park 120 • Sugden Regional Park 173.27 Total park, open, or green space within or adjacent to CRA area Table 5-3-1: Amount of Parks and Open Space. Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue and Google Earth calculation Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 347.75 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 5.3.4 Development Development and redevelopment can improve the quality and aesthetics of the built environment, as well as generate tax revenue and benefits to property owners through increased property values. This development and redevelopment activity also needs to include protections for existing community members who may face burdens from the increase in property values, such as increased costs for renters. This section provides an approach to foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. Also documented are more specific planning and visioning efforts for two key development opportunities, at the Mini Triangle and 17-Acre sites. 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 GOAL ......... Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-31 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 1: Improve the marketing, branding, and communication approach for the CRA area. • Strategy 1: Create a branding strategy for the CRA area to establish a community vision and character. This strategy should coordinate with the Arts and Culture Plan and the Market Study for the CRA (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, Strategy 5 and Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy 1). Strategy 2: Create a marketing and communication strategy for the CRA area to communicate vision and character with effective tools (e.g., website, social media, branding materials). This strategy should coordinate with the comprehensive design approach developed for the CRA area (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1), as well as improved communication efforts between the CRA and the community (see Section 5.3.7, Objective 1). Strategy 3: Provide CRA administrative materials (e.g., Advisory Board agendas, budgets, annual reports) in an accessible and easy -to -understand way. Strategy 4: Coordinate with the Collier County Tourist Development Council, Collier County Parks & Recreation Division, and other jurisdictions to promote the CRA area and its local business and commercial establishments as part of tourism development efforts in the area. This should include coordination with Collier County Parks & Recreation related to East Naples Community Park master planning and pickleball sports tourism. • Strategy S: Create an Arts and Culture Plan for the CRA area to incorporate into the overall CRA area vision. This effort should: �5-3-320000'*0 • Consider prior arts and culture planning efforts, such as those related to the Bayshore Cultural District (Resolution No 2008-60). • Incorporate an inventory of existing artistic and cultural features of the community to elevate. • Include a comprehensive public realm design approach for the CRA area and sub -areas (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1). • Consider housing needs and economic incentives related to arts and culture -oriented development (see Section 5.3.4, Objectives 3 and 5). • Include administrative needs of implementing the plan (e.g., an arts committee, additional staff). • Coordinate with countywide arts and culture strategic planning efforts. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Objective 2: Streamline and clarify the development process • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to clarify LDC requirements related to development in the CRA area, particularly related to: • Relationship of overlay zoning to base zoning • Relationship of various applicable codes to each other (e.g., LDC, fire code, building code) • Allowable uses • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to evaluate approaches to streamline and shorten the development review process. Approaches might include: • Dedicating County staff to review projects within the CRA area and expedite them through the development process. • Improving coordination and communication between entities overseeing applicable codes (e.g., Zoning, Fire Marshall). • Identifying opportunities to increase reliance on defined criteria for development approval (as opposed to discretionary approval) • Encouraging design -build approaches. • Strategy 3: Establish a formal role for the CRA in the development review process to facilitate development of projects in the CRA area. US Open Pickleboll Championships at East Naples Community Park. Source: Collier County Parks & Recreation Division, https.// www.facebook.com/Co//ierPorkslphotosl o.852037184807466.1073741827.118036328207559/19606389606 13944/?type=3& theater Existing artistic features, such as murals, should be considered in the Arts and Culture Plan Clearer LDC guidance would help new uses such as microbreweries Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-33 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 3: Incentivize desired types of development. • Strategy 1: Conduct a market study, including information on owners of second homes, which is not captured in typical data sets, to determine what development will be supported in the CRA area. • • �5-3-340000'*0 Strategy 2: Identify incentives and targeted assistance (see Development Assistance and Incentives Examples) for a range of development and redevelopment, including consideration of the following types of development and additional desirable development supported by the market study: • Local neighborhood commercial establishments • Social enterprises and business opportunities for those with tenuous livelihoods • Larger catalyst development projects • Arts -oriented development Strategy 3: Evaluate and amend as needed current grant program offerings to reflect new incentives and assistance approaches from Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy 2. Objective 4: Capitalize on current and potential real estate and development opportunities. • Strategy 1: Facilitate tenancy, development, and redevelopment, particularly for opportunities along US 41, Linwood Ave and neighboring non- residential areas, and Bayshore Dr, through incentives and communication efforts (see Development Assistance and Incentives Examples). • Strategy 2: Continue to facilitate existing catalyst project opportunities on the Mini Triangle and 17- Acre sites (see Map 5-3-10) to strengthen and solidify development interest in the CRA area. Efforts might include assisting with coordination of property owners in target areas, negotiating desired amenities to be incorporated into proposed development, and providing incentives (see Development Assistance and Incentives Examples). • Strategy 3: Evaluate alternative funding opportunities, such as private funding and donations, for capital projects. • Strategy 4: Assess development opportunities for the Activity Center area, including the Courthouse Shadows site. • Strategy 5: Evaluate concepts to expand the CRA boundaries . Considerations might include the incorporation of new development opportunities, such as areas along Thomasson Drive, and the incorporation of County parks. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 eADDITIONAL INFORMATION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Development Assistance and Incentives Examples • Density/intensity increases • Impact fee offsets or payment over time • TIF rebates and TIF money for infrastructure • Land acquisition through CRA for targeted needs, such as parking and stormwater infrastructure, and to facilitate redevelopment • Tenant attraction and relocation support • Micro -enterprise incubator and technical assistance support in partnership with other local entities Potential Partnership Opportunities for Micro -Enterprise Incubator Incubators can provide workspace and assistance to micro -enterprises, particularly small businesses, looking to get their start in the CRA area. The CRA could potentially partner with existing efforts or collaborate on new efforts to support the work of incubators. For example, the Naples Accelerator (https://naplesaccelerator.com/) provides office space and amenities and connections to local economic resources to assist its member businesses. There may also be interest from other local entities, such as St. Matthew's House, in partnering to start a new incubator. Such partnerships can bring together organizations to pool capacity and funding to carry out incubator efforts and can also be used to support artists and arts -oriented development, a key aspect of the CRA's vision. Other Partnership Opportunities: Business Associations The CRA encourages businesses operating in the area to form associations and business districts to coordinate development efforts and potential funding tools such as MSTUs. Such associations can also serve as important partners to the CRA in its implementation of development assistance and incentives. Areas where these associations might be particularly beneficial are among the Bayshore Drive businesses, the Mini Triangle are property owners, and the property owners along Linwood Avenue and Kirkwood Avenue. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-35 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS BADDITIONAL INFORMATION ...................................... Development and Redevelopment Potential Figure 5-3-5 provides a general indication of the development opportunities in the CRA area, showing vacant land acreage and the corresponding number of vacant parcels by land use type that could potentially be developed and indicating that most of the vacant acreage is residential. Map 5-3-9 indicates where these parcels are located. As the map indicates, the parcel sizes can run fairly small, so assembly may be a consideration for developers. The background analysis for the Redevelopment Area Plan also indicates a sizable number of parcels with structures, particularly single-family and mobile homes, that might benefit from upgrades to improve their structural condition. These efforts should take into account any potential increases in prices and costs when units are upgraded to avoid pricing out residents who find the new price and cost points unaffordable. 109 acres (389 parcels) 41 acres (62 parcels) 36 acres* (4 parcels) - 0 acres 0 acres Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Governmental Figure 5-3-5: Vacant Land Acreage Distribution by Land Use Type. *Note: A 32.5-acre parcel northwest of the eayshore/Thomasson intersection is coded as Vacant Institutional but is owned by Mottomy Naples LLC. (Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) 5-3-36 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 .nn I',;. ��� �i , nil lilGOP ul to°r� �����`■i■� � � :LL � � ■ �� 1 � iu °liimiiiiiii _ o a is ' nn■ I■nn anon- � `Milli i lr nllilll�lllllllll � ni ■i � III lu■■ n mrui 1� i■ii � � �iii �' ` ■Illil � �p � ■Illll '� m U l' U ` <�� �' iri ® eo ® 41. • c � 71I� � �r "rrrm--r„ � w BARRETT=AVE �g o_ a Sugden L ¢� ' Regional Park _ -- - i; = THOMASSON DR ZO t—F KAREN DR , .... aples Naples East N r - Commwnit P❑ ¢_ �� Botanical s41rr �� �� f ,yJ„� -.Garden ❑ CRA Boundary - }" [r rr' , . mm BayProperty Parcels vlew Park a e. _:_. ...-- .. _. ..L!r Non -Vacant Parcel �. t Vacant Parcels vlt l Vacant esiden o - V tR f I RNDREWS=RVE _ .. JuVacantGommeraa .. i,' I tt t I "_aljz 3Jli -:::. .Vacant ns i u iona _: Park WeUands ?sly','.'.'. i, ul,[t E J - ? - City o t ._. — i7J1,r p Na les ._..._._ 1 f1 � 511f! _ I Map 5-3-9: Vacant Land Parcels in CRA Area. Note: Vacant institutional land northwest of Bayshore Dr/Thomasson Dr intersection is coded as Va- cant Institutional but it owned by Mattamy Naples LLC. (Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 �5-3-37 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS fj RECOMMENDATIONS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Development & Real Estate Opportunities The CRA can facilitate development, redevelopment, and tenancy of vacant spaces through incentives and improvements to the surrounding areas. Map 5-3-10 and corresponding images show some of the key opportunities in the CRA area; note that the Mini Triangle site and the 17-Acre Site contain parcels currently nwnarl hu tha CRA Linwood Avenue commercial corridor redevelopment Gulfgote Plaza office tenant opportunity Del's 24 redevelopment opportunity Courthouse Shadows redevelopment Bayshore Drive commercial corridor redevelopment (including Halde- man Creek Entertainment District near Creek) 1\ 5-3-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 N �Dl.AV� ISTBLVD 84 IRKWO D E Ii �_IJ o� ■ • Mini LINW000 AVE z, Triangle -,9 0 Site V)- F� q - 90 ` do ...:. 17 -Ac rye Sugden r Regional Site m g<!Vp Park THOMASSONLu D Z ::.=': O' K EN DR "i 0 Vacant Non -Residential ' �_ - East Naples'_ Naples Commercial Community'= Q:.:. Botanical — Industrial :.:..._ a Park ■ .._-...„Garden ' ■ Institutional •'► r ''1 j'%> +a_ _ Naples Botanical Garden .. _._: pi"k ■ _ ■County vla 1 .::kr. .. .._ ....... .._..: --. Yalu..'"::•..;._. - - ._.. -:.. ■State - lt .:_:_ kr .:_:_. _ u ■ Naples1, --... ... ..:c.-:. :. ulu i::==: ANDREWS AVE Utility/Other - _:vJrrlti ':: ❑CRA Boundary _: =.., art W - --- -. etlands - CJ City of Naples a. - , A& i AV vU;: '?::.::ii.._: __:_?ilfr __:..? ::::: •n:.:_ fir :::. _ __:' :•:.._ - _ _ Map 5-3-10: Development & Real Estate Opportunities with Non -Residential Existing Land Use; Data source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-39 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 5: Incorporate protections in de- velopment efforts to enhance existing community character and support existing CRA area residents. • Strategy 1: Establish assistance programs and incentives to protect and enhance existing com- munity -oriented uses and local neighborhood commercial and single-family neighborhoods off the main corridors. Assistance and incentive dis- tribution might account for building age, struc- tural quality, and means of property owners. • Strategy 2: In coordination with the Collier Coun- ty Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, pro- mote strategies to maintain current affordable housing availability in the CRA while improving BADDITIONAL INFORMATION • • • • • • • • Collier County Mobile Home Upgrade Program Collier County Community & Human Services Division currently oversees a program that uses State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program funds to replace mobile homes with more sturdy single-family modular homes in response to hurricane damage. In Everglades City, these homes are elevated on stilts. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA may be able to refine this pro- gram to meet the needs of the community to encour- age replacement with a more suitable building type for the area. Residential Renovation & the FEMA 50% Rule baseline quality conditions. Strategies to consider The FEMA 50% Rule requires that any existing building include: within an identified FEMA Flood Zone will have to be upgraded to meet current flood standards if improve - Community land trust ments are made that are in excess of 50% of the struc- • Coordinating with Collier County Com- ture value. When determining structure value, only the munity & Human Services Division for value of the improvement itself (exclusive of land value) mobile home upgrades and replace- is considered. During the building permit review pro- ments with alternative unit types (see cess, the County will require anyone located within a Housing Assistance and Incentives Exam - flood zone to go through a review process to ensure that proposed improvements are not worth in excess of ples) 50% of the building value. The CRA may consider Bevel- • Residential renovation loan/grant pro- oping partnerships/grants to assist in replacing struc- gram tures to encourage bringing existing buildings up to code and maintain affordability. • Encouraging use of Collier County's im- pact fee deferral program for income - restricted units (see Housing Assistance Impact Fee Deferral for Income -Restricted Units and Incentives Examples) Several cities and counties in Florida, including Collier County, offer impact fee incentives for affordable and/ or workforce housing. In Collier County, for -purchase and rental units for households with incomes less than 120% of median income in the county qualify for impact fee deferrals. Deferrals are equivalent to up to 3% of the prior year's total impact fee collections, a cap insti- tuted to minimize revenue lost through the program. 5-3-4 \ Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 The County also limits to 225 the number of rental units receiving deferrals. Impact fees are deferred for owner - occupied units until the owner sells, refinances, or moves out of the home, at which time fees are due with interest. Rental unit fees are deferred for a 10-year pe- riod. Historically, this level of deferral has allowed the program to defer impact fees on approximately 100 homes per year. A pilot program for payment of impact fees by installments collected through property tax bills (as an alternative to making the entire payment up- front) was also planned for the Immokalee CRA area. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA could support or replicate the County's program to defer fees in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area; this approach could also be used to incentivize other types of desired development, as well. Case Information Source: Tindale Oliver (August 2017), Impact Fee Incen- tives for Affordable/Workforce Housing. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-41 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3.5 Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability Having a variety of transportation options that are easy and desirable to use are important for all who live and work in the CRA area. Transportation systems not only cater to local needs between the CRA area and places such as Downtown Naples and local work- places, but also to more regional traffic moving through the CRA area on major roadways. In light of the various needs, this section aims to ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CRA area. ........... @ GOAL ......... . Ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CRA area. �5-3-420000'*0 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Objective 1: Increase safety, comfort, and connectivity for active transportation modes (e.g., walking and biking). • Strategy 1: Create a strategy to implement discrete transportation improvements and more comprehensive Complete Streets corridor improvements. • Strategy 2: The effort undertaken for Strategy 1 should include development of a sidewalk master plan with inclusion of the following: • Visibility assessment related to landscaping • Consideration of connections to neighboring parks (see Section 5.3.3, Objective 1, Strategy 1 and Strategy 6 in this section) • Coordination with roadway and elements on, for example, Complete Streets, the Vision Zero effort to eliminate bicycle and pedestrian fatalities, and roundabouts. • Strategy 5: Based on input from temporary installations from Strategy 4, move forward with vetting of Bayshore Dr road diet concept scenarios and traffic analysis. • Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for a north/ south bicycle and pedestrian connector in the eastern Bayshore area with connections to Sugden Park and East Naples Community Park (see Section 5.3.3, Objective 1, Strategy 1). • • • • • • • • • B ADDITIONAL INFORMATION What are Complete Streets? Streets that "serve the transportation needs of infrastructure improvements planned and/ transportation system users of all ages and abilities, or approved for implementation, including including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, those that may stem from this Redevelopment Area Planning process or other agency planning and implementation efforts (e.g., County and CRA stormwater master planning). • Strategy 3: Identify opportunities to coordinate transportation capital improvements with County/ MPO improvements along major arterials. • Strategy 4: Pilot transportation improvements, such as elements of Complete Streets corridor improvements, elements of Bayshore Dr road diet (traffic lane consolidation), reduced turning radii at intersections to slow traffic, and additional pedestrian crossings, with temporary installations. These efforts should incorporate community input and feedback to gauge response to more urban - style development and any particular concerns to address or opportunities on which to capitalize. These installations can be incorporated into community events that include educational motorists, and freight handlers. A transportation system based on Complete Streets principles can help to promote safety, quality of life, and economic development." - FDOT, Completing Florida's Streets, http://www. f7completestreets. com/fi`/eslFDOT- CompleteStreets-Brochure. pdf. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-43 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS •• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Existing Transportation Conditions Map 5-3-11 highlights existing transportation conditions identified by fieldwork. Roadways in the CRA area range from large arterials carrying regional traffic to small neighborhood streets, many of which dead-end throughout the CRA area. During fieldwork, cyclists were noted on the sidewalks of larger arterials such as Davis Boulevard and Airport Pulling Road, and many bikes were parked at Gulfgate Plaza off of US 41. The MPO and FDOT also identified Airport Pulling Road and US 41 as high bike/pedestrian crash corridors. Relative to other streets, Bayshore Drive has a number of improvements, including bike lanes, sidewalks, and transit shelters, yet it still experiences a lack of parking. There are limited pedestrian connections to parks from streets off Bayshore Drive; one connection is at Republic Drive. Note that these existing conditions are a general, preliminary assessment, with more detailed measures of existing conditions such as trip counts and traffic modeling anticipated as part of follow-up strategy— and project -specific evaluation prior to a decision to implement. Divided arterial with street fronting parking Bayshore Drive with sidewalks and bike lanes Dead-end neighborhood street Cyclist on sidewalk of arterial Bus shelter at Bayshore Drive and Thomosson Drive Pedestrian bridge to East Naples Community Park 5-3-44 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 �� � 90 41 BAR ET LJ LU Sugden co Regional Park 4 Ea Naples ar S Roadway Classification Garden �Highway Minor Arterial Collector Local Other [3CRA Boundary Park Ak k. AL Wetlands City of Na les mops-3-1z: Existing Transportation Conditions with Roadway Classifications 8ayshoreGateway Triangle CRAArea Plan —May 2019 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Specific Transportation Needs & Considerations Fieldwork, discussions with CRA staff, public outreach, and specific project recommendations from the 2018 Blue Zones Project/Dan Burden East Naples Discovery Report informed location -specific, discrete transportation needs and considerations in the CRA area (Map 5-3-12). Many of these needs and considerations will be addressed through Complete Streets projects recommended in this Redevelopment Area Plan. Other transportation improvements such as addressing sidewalk and bike infrastructure gaps, providing parking infrastructure, and providing wayfinding signs will be addressed through separate project recommendations. Note that "Major Corridors" are designated based on highways, minor arterials, and major arterials in the area. "Needs Corridors" are designated where needs identified are generalized along the length of a roadway segment (related needs are those where labels intersect the corridor on Map 5-3-12). OCurb extensions © General bike accessibility © Pedestrian crossing(s) 0 Bike lanes © General connectivity, walkability ONorth/south connectivity QEast/west connectivity 0 Sidewalk(s) OWayfinding Lighting Road diet (lane reduction) Major Corridor ■ ■ ■ ■ Needs Corridor 0 Traffic circulation along corridor, including intersections © Traffic calming © Connect street OCommercial parking Parking including boat parking 5-3-46 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 15.3 �r �1 nm�� Ec 2 DAVIS I -_", 1 ` �•. ®®® 8 1 1 1111►� JA&F .111111.111111 • +i�►� I� Innn�� iinnn�nnnm �I � 1� 131W3 __- m0 a p'' ,9 . � 3 .1 IIIIIL-n1IIII11,1 � ■ ..L.IIIL., . a __ mcm I II .11111.111111.111." i , ..�IIIIIILII' — .111...11.11 IIIL1.11\IIII. ,.. .111111111.11.1..1 �II�I.�II��� nnnnnnnnnnnm IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ..mum.umr 111111►.•��� _ IIIIIIIIIIIII _ , :�_ -• � := _ - 7 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII► — • - Alf ® ■�11i.—� . _ I�111111111111111. 7 �_ .. .II,111111 . - .III ■1.11 � 11111111111111111, l� I.Illlll.r l�l s� Illy -mom Em f ✓ia I= I I' Dili P �OQ�►�` . Il�rlallllallllllllll� 01 '111111.1.111111111111 o II- ,�11 6 8 1�.111�351119.II1ii17i:7 _e qW Illlllllllll...11r • - ••- II�.1.11.1111111' 1111.11131112i1 ?, 7 ■ II ppQIIIIIIIILIIIm:::II= ''� 1�IIII�IIIIlIIII�IIIII �_ r, _ ` i Map 5-3-12: Transportation Needs & Considerations Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-47 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS eADDITIONAL INFORMATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Regional & County Transportation Projects The projects shown in Map 5-3-13 are those identified in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's Fiscal Year 2017/18 to 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (which also features the Collier County five-year program) and the trail recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan update process. These projects will thus be overseen by regional and county transportation agencies. The full set of recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan, once finalized, should also be considered in conjunction with transportation planning and improvements led by the CRA. 1 1°1 FDOT TIP Projects ...... • US 41 resurfacing • US 41 signal timing improvements • Davis Boulevard resurfacing County TIP Projects • Davis Boulevard/Airport Pulling Road intersection improvement MPO Pathways Plan Proposed Trail Improvements ...... • Naples Bay Greenway (Sun Trail) Major Corridor 5-3-48 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Map 5-3-13: Regional & County Transportation Projects Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 ISM 5-3-49 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 RECOMMENDATIONS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Potential CRA Complete Streets Projects & Trails Complete Streets is an approach to comprehensive corridor improvements tailored to the size and land use context of the corridor. This approach can address many of the major needs and considerations identified in Map 5-3-13, including traffic calming, sidewalks, bike lanes, lighting, wayfinding, on -street parking, and landscaping. Complete streets improvements can also be coordinated with other infrastructure improvements, such as water main, fire suppression, and drainage upgrades. The CRA can take the lead on Complete Streets projects, focusing on the streets listed below categorized. Fieldwork, staff discussions, public outreach, and prior planning efforts informed which streets were targeted for these improvements. Map 5-3-14 shows recommended projects for neighborhood streets and busier corridors ("Major Complete Streets"). Suggested improvements for Major Complete Streets corridors may include changes to the roadway for vehicles (such as the addition of on -street parking). Neighborhood Complete Streets & Trails recommendations focus primarily on improvements for pedestrians, cyclists, and other active transportation (see the remainder of Section 5.3.5 for examples of suggested improvements). Connectivity in terms of destinations and network connections was a key consideration in selection and prioritization of these projects. Note that the length of the bicycle and pedestrian trail will depend on considerations such as available right-of-way; the Section 5.4 capital planning provides an estimate for a section between East Naples Community Park and Sugden Regional park. Also note that the Kirkwood Avenue "connection" between Pine Street and Shadowlawn and the Pine Street "connection" between Davis and Linwood refer to proposed roadway extensions that that do not have existing right-of-way. VMajor Complete Streets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • Linwood Avenue —Phase I • Shadowlawn Drive • Bayshore Drive (north of Thomasson Drive) • Thomasson Drive • Commercial Drive • Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection to Shadowlawn Drive • Pine Street Connection Major Corridor Neighborhood Complete Streets & Trails ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • Bay Street • Linwood —Phase II • Danford Street • Hamilton Avenue • Jeepers Drive • Republic Drive • Bayshore Drive (south of Thomasson Drive) • Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail 5-3-50 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 ill � III IILIIIIIII _, � III , r� L � ��■�■1�.� '1.■1�11�11■ '- _ ' 111•r'll�lll i ,Iin► doom lm , J -- I ■ ■lngloolillonom j 9 � fir 1� ��e•:!� ♦ .i111I I�lIG�II� �'1 � .IL1�11. , , , IIIIIr"••••, n�s�lm • ISIn .a nnnnn�num � nnnnnnn nnnnl�nlll-■IIII■11�. �IIIIIIIII�II�1� — �nnnnmm�nnnnmi � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �""°�"°I""°O°�-11" 111111►�� :: IIIIIIIIIIIIIICI - �_ �Q�bL pi'u" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII► : ,��� � - i i .n�non I i`� � �1111�1�11 it � � 1 ■ 1 "11 11 I I .• fr >III■IIL.d I ,�Q4► _ Y..I.IIIII�11111111111' ly I � �, : i� �IIIIIII�11111111111111 r "- IIIIIIW��I yr F in .IIIin1116dIII1.J) 9R9111'•IIIP� 2anonsEmmsm,IJI�11�0[7II ♦1 �, Ip�nlslnlmllllossl Ili 111111111111.1■III IIq�11.11.11111111111111 ■ - � � - '1111111111112i1121111111 ■ �IiIIIIIIIIl1111nnnu=II IIIIIIIIII�I�Il1,11111111'- r, _ Map 5-3-14: Potential Complete Streets Projects Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-51 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS BADDITIONAL INFORMATION••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••� Character Images for Complete Streets Improvements and Connections The following images illustrate Complete Streets elements from prior planning efforts for Bayshore Dr and Complete Streets improvements elsewhere. BAYSHORE DRIVE CENTER FAST WEST ROW LINL ROW LINE 24' 24' r 7' 20' -- - I� 20' T t .§J5 5' 3.5' 4' ill ill 4' S 5.5' 15' PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION Two LANE ROAD NTH PARALLEL PARKING, BIKELANES AND SIDEWALKS DESIGN SPEED = 30 MPH Potential cross section for Bayshore Dr road diet, as proposed in Trebilcock's 2017 Parking Needs Analysis. Existing cross section is four -lane road with bike lanes and sidewalks Complete Streets improvement examples (Left image source: Wikimedia Commons) These efforts and examples inspired the renderings of possible transformations for Linwood Ave, Bayshore Dr, and Jeepers Dr (shown in Figures 5-3-6 through 5-3-9) suggested as part of this Redevelopment Area Plan update effort. As corridors for potential commercial redevelopment, the Linwood Ave and Bayshore Dr renderings highlight an emphasis on ample sidewalk space along the landscaping and storefronts. Linwood Ave might promote a more modern design style for lighting and streetscape features as shown in Figure 5-3-6 and potentially further inspired by the modern style images on page 5-3- 22. Bayshore Dr might retain the existing style of streetscape elements in the lighting and signs. These renderings can provide a starting point for Complete Streets designs of other busier corridors (see "Major Complete Streets" on Map 5-3- 49), with the Linwood Ave design particularly suited as a basis for the suggested re -designs of Commercial Dr and Kirkwood Ave. As a less traveled residential street type, Jeepers Dr shows how people biking, walking, and playing can share the street space with cars accessing residences. Given that many streets dead-end and do not allow for through traffic, more simplified pedestrian infrastructure may be promoted over formal sidewalks. For example, the pedestrian space in the 5-3-52 1\ Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 rendering might be indicated with road paint. The swales have also been retained for water quality considerations, but incorporate vegetation to improve the visual appearance of swales. Porous pavement may also be an option for the areas where swales are represented, which might require different maintenance costs (an aspect that would be addressed with a more detailed follow-up design evaluation as noted below). Lighting in provided on one side given the limited road space, similar to improvements made on Lunar St in the CRA area. This type of design might serve as a starting point for the re- design of other neighborhood Complete Streets projects (see Map 5-3-49). Note that these proposed cross sections are only intended for general, initial illustrative purposes; final designs would need to account for a more detailed study and analysis of factors including engineering considerations, impacts, mitigation needs, and potentially the increase of alternative transportation methods (see Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section for examples). For example, a follow-up analysis of a lane reduction proposal on Bayshore Drive would need to account for impacts to Level of Service standards on the roadway and on connecting roadways such as US 41, air quality, freight and evacuation routes, and a variety of other factors. It would also study whether additional easements would be needed or desired for a re -design. Piloting temporary versions of these improvements also provides a way to vet the design. This plan accounts for this follow-up analysis need and piloting with budgeted items for a Bayshore Drive technical feasibility study, a Complete Streets Implementation Plan that would provide a next -level feasibility analysis for these projects, and a Bayshore Drive pilot project with opportunities for additional pilots as part of the "other" non -capital projects budget item (see Section 5.4 for more information). 0 m z F w jf .�. All'rA SIDEWALK CG PARKINGI BUFFER TRAVELLANE TRAVEL LANE PARKINGIBUFFER CG SIDEWALK 2' 11' 9' 8' 7 60' Lp 0Avenue ION WITH SIDEWALKS ANPARALLE D L PARKING: SCALE 114" - 1 Linwood' Tindale>4,Oliver „�, W&2018 — —uw d+...,m�,.ow.,..w.,�..�,.e e�..»a.,.��4.u., a.a... r.w�.e,. m �...,,.,sx.em�. ao, d e s 1 9 n Figure 5-3-6: Potential Cross Section of Linwood Ave Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-53 5.3 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS — mcmicup ,Nor— pm liht LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK TRAVEL LANE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN TRAVEL ANE LANE BIKE PARKING LANDSCAPE LANE fPAR:1:�31KE Venee 58' 3' '5' 11' p' L JfEWALK LANDSCAPE 15'CG 1.&CGJ LANDSCAPE 100, �v0 Ci0uylty TWO LANE e Drive SECTION WITH MEDIAN, BIKE LANE, PARALLEL PARKING AND SIDEWALKS AND : SCALE 1/8' • VSaysho 9/17QO18 �' Tndaler <Oliver d e s I g n Figure 5-3-7: Potential Cross Section for Bayshore Dr BIOSWALE TRAVEL LANE BIKEIPED BIOSWALL LANE 2L1' 14' 8' 23 60' ONE LANE SECTION WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN LANE AND BIOSWALES: SCALE 1/4' = V LO Jeepere Drive CONYILy 9/172BIS Figure 5-3-8: Potential Cross Section forleepers Dr 5-3-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 Tindale> <Oliver design PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 BIOSWALE TRAVEL LANE BIKElPED BIOSWALE LANE 20'�� 14'� 6'�20' 80' ONE LANE PLAN WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN k r LANE AND BIOSWALES: SCALE 118" = 1' Tindale> <Oliver CiOf4ilLy Jeepers Drive gi17/2018 design wryv a.vr »w s uno.mso .w o-cwxd aw..ws ro m.,,,�r m w �Ko rw roawn m+amar �vva,aa�.va+: a rro uau aocnw Figure 5-3-9: Potential Aerial Rendering for Jeepers Dr Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 �5-3-55 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 2: Increase and enhance alternative vehicle mode options within and connecting with the CRA area. • Strategy 1: Evaluate opportunities for alternative transportation methods (e.g., golf carts, electric shuttles, other neighborhood/electric vehicles, shared and/or autonomous vehicles, bikeshare, water -borne transportation), including considerations for partnerships with neighboring communities. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement Department for transit service and facilities improvements (e.g., more frequent service and transit stop shelters). • Strategy 3: Evaluate option to expand Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) to include entire CRA area. Objective 3: Improve parking options in commercial areas. • Strategy 1: Evaluate parking concepts for the Bayshore Dr and Mini Triangle/Linwood Ave commercial areas, which may include: • Shared parking with shuttle service, particularly to meet peak -season demand • Reduced design requirements for parking • On -street parking as part of the Bayshore Dr road diet • Parking garages • Parking mitigation fee (development pays for construction of public parking in lieu of providing parking spaces) • Considerations for changes in alternative transportation methods such as those noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section. 5-3-56 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 1 5.3 BADDITIONAL INFORMATION •...•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) Policy 5.4 of the Transportation Element in the Growth Management Plan created the South US 41 TCEA. This designation allows commercial and residential developments an exception to meeting transportation concurrency standards, which relate to the timing and programming of necessary transportation facilities to ensure they are generally provided in a timeframe comparable to the development. (see Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element for more details). The strategies developers can use to obtain the exception are intended to reduce trips or miles traveled in single -occupancy vehicles, such as incentives and amenities to promote transit, carpooling, telecommuting, walking, and biking. This Redevelopment Area Plan reinforces these strategies by promoting mixed -used and urban land use types that support alternative transportation (see Section 5.3.2). Objectives 1 and 2 of this section also promote improved facilities for walking, bilking, and transit use. A potential option to further align the redevelopment efforts of the CRA and the goals of the TCEA is to expand the TCEA to include all of the CRA area, expanding the exception applicability to further encourage alternative transportation. STHAVE S 41 02 DAVIS BLVD _ Public Commercial Residential Total Acres _Q_ 92.96 540.58 429.49 1063.03 -- ) A - -o I 8.74% 50.85% 40.41% 100% o - (� C I Z - 41 - -- Z —�- rn m } — THOMASSON DR'= - I_ _ -�_:z - RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD 5 0 0:-f5- 0.3 0.6 — 0.9 �t� Miles --- — GIS MAPPING: BEfH YANG. AICP —_ - - 41 vnc Par ors TR - 4 6.rmo<N°,m��yrn..ye ReeevNCPneOt °vaAs/ An P—W COW If OD%); Sum of Sues=1063.03(100%) South US 41 Transportation niud the ACNiYCenln sb3aoie V•m1H: Count = 229 (14.1%); Sum of —f = 116A1 (1(19%) —Av 0r1—R.•' Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) N—Va—t CWnt=1366(85-6%): Sum of ecfes=946.62(89.1%) Af4fiallColetlor ROSOr South US 41 TCEA (Source: Collier County Growth Management Plan, Transportation Element, Map TR-4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-57 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 4: Improve transportation connections with Downtown Naples. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the City of Naples to explore and partner on transportation improvements and approaches serving both Downtown Naples and the CRA area noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section. BADDITIONAL INFORMATION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study This study, completed in 2017, included a recommendation for an improved bicycle and pedestrian pathway on the Gordon River Bridge (5th Avenue/US 41) that connects Downtown Naples and the Triangle area. The proposed design calls for narrower travel lanes and removal of the road shoulder to increase the bicycle and pedestrian pathway to 14 feet on either side of the bridge. If implemented, the responsibility for carrying out the project would be FDOT. 1 10 A gw * AiN16 sh." U. P" V" W T,lwd L i 9 � wd lw PL. -q w0 u •rl u , u 11 u is 140 04 04 1 T—d l0 T,.yd WM a sh w iw n m it u —u— 12 r, 14 Proposed typical section for Gordon River Bridge bicycle and pedestrian improvement from 2017 Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study (Source: City of Naples, https://www.naplesgov.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/streets amp storm water/proiect/3351 city council presentation 201710 final revisions.adf) 5-3-58 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 5.3.6 Infrastructure Infrastructure can be key to facilitating development, providing the services communities need to function. Certain infrastructure, such as for stormwater management, is particularly important in the CRA area, which grapples with natural environmental factors including storms and flooding but also benefits from a healthy natural environment due to quality of life factors and tourism. As a result, the framework for this section aims to provide effective infrastructure that preserves environmental and neighborhood design quality through coordinated improvement planning and funding. ........... @ GOAL .......... Provide effective infrastructure that preserves environmental and neighborhood design quality through coordinated improvement planning and funding. Objective 1: Ensure that infrastructure provided will effectively achieve its primary purpose without significantly compromising environmental and neighborhood design quality. • Strategy 1: Develop a stormwater master plan for comprehensive infrastructure improvements that incorporates consideration for the following: • Flood plain designations, including FEMA flood designations and Coastal High Hazard requirements • Building and site plan design to respond to flooding • Primary, secondary, and tertiary infrastructure improvements (both short - and long-term) • Potential for a bicycle and pedestrian pathway in easement of north/south drainage ditch along Sugden Regional Park • Shared maintenance and maintenance funding between County and CRA • Water quality • Use/design of right-of-way areas on local streets, including an evaluation of turf block (see page 5-3-58) • Innovative techniques to pilot in CRA area, including green infrastructure • Strategy 2: Coordinate stormwater infrastructure planning with design of new parks (see Section 5.3.3, Objective 1). • Strategy 3: Integrate green infrastructure improvements into landscaping and drainage improvements, including those funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-59 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS eADDITIONAL INFORMATION --••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Green Infrastructure Examples Green infrastructure aims to reduce stormwater runoff and treat it closer to its source while providing environmental, social, and economic benefits. The following examples create surfaces or collection structures that allow stormwater to infiltrate the underlying or surrounding ground. They also can help manage stormwater flows and improve water quality of runoff and often can be combined with vegetation and landscaping. • Infiltration basin/retention pond —shallow basins or ponds that collect stormwater and can allow it to infiltrate the underlying ground • Permeable pavement — pavement that allows water to flow through and infiltrate the underlying ground • Rain garden —shallow planted basins that allow water to infiltrate the ground • Bioswales— vegetated or soft -lined channels that collect and convey, slow, and clean water and let it infiltrate into the ground • Vegetated planter boxes and bulb -outs— infiltration areas with raised edges that can be incorporated into roadway design features • Tree plantings Kissimmee Lakefront Park rain gardens (Source: City of Kissimmee, https://www. kissimmee. org/Home/Components/News/ News/2208/263?back1ist=%2F) Vegetated infiltration area in roadway bulb -out in Palmetto, FL at 10th Ave Wand 5m St W (Source: Google Maps, htt s: www.google.com/Mopsl@27.515152Z- 82.575633,3a,60V,118.29h, 75.57t/data=!3m 6!1 e1 !3m4! lslahgGivzSzLDetQ43h5HQg!2e0!7il3312!8i6656) Retention pond amenities in Tampa at E Dr Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd and N 191h St (Source: Google Maps, https.11www.aooQie.com/maps/@2Z9815571, 04 -82.4391844,3a,60y,90t/data=!3m6!let!3m4!1sQ13ul3LDTatc2Vr7pk�g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)-,q\ 5-3-60 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 W.-Ur'Un Turf block, shown in the right-of-way area immediately bordering the street in the photo above, has been used in certain developments in the Bayshore neighborhood to allow for use of right-of-way space for park- ing. This option should be evaluated as part of the right-of-way design considerations in the stormwater master plan update. Objective 2: Coordinate with other jurisdictions and government entities for infrastructure planning and funding. • Strategy 1: Identify additional funding opportunities to supplement capital improvements funds (e.g., grants). • Strategy 2: Document the project prioritization strategy to upgrade water lines and fire suppression systems in coordination with the City of Naples. • Strategy 3: As part of the stormwater master plan (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this section), coordinate with Collier County Stormwater Management to integrate CRA stormwater infrastructure planning with County stormwater planning efforts. • Strategy 4: As part of the stormwater master plan effort (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this section), coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to create right-of-way design guidelines for development that coordinate with Complete Streets concepts for neighborhood streets. • Strategy S: Coordinate with Collier County agencies and utility providers to identify and improve other infrastructure including sanitary sewer lines, roadways that fail to meet minimum standards, and electrical utilities identified to be placed underground or relocated. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS .................................... Infrastructure—Stormwater, Roadway Engineering, Sanitary Sewer, Electric Stormwater and flooding are major challenges in the CRA area, requiring special attention be paid to stormwater management projects. The CRA has already overseen a successful drainage improvement project on Karen Drive, and moving forward, will coordinate with the County Stormwater Management Section. Map 5-3-15 shows where further stormwater management improvements are needed based on public outreach. Additional needs should be identified through an updated stormwater master plan for the area. Other identified infrastructure needs on the map include upgrading certain roads to meet County standards, upgrading capacity of sanitary sewer infrastructure in certain areas, and placing underground or relocating overhead electric utilities in certain areas. ONeed for culverts for flooding, 0 Retention pond area improvements needed —lighting, security, barriers/gates to direct car traffic, pump improvements for flooding issues 0 Flooding issues and need for drainage Flooding issues and need for drainage on side streets off of Bayshore Drive. Note that Pine Tree Drive, Andrews Avenue, and Woodside Avenue have been identified as below County standards 0 (involving for example sufficient right-of-way, drainage, paving, or similar elements) in Resolution 2011-097. These streets should be a focus in stormwater and infrastructure planning to bring them up to standards. 0 Flooding issues and need for drainage on Holly Avenue. Holly Avenue also identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering improvements (see Item 4 above). i 0 Palmetto Court identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering improvements (see item 4 above). 0 Upgrades needed to sanitary sewer capacity in the Triangle area to support new development. Opportunities to place overhead electric utilities on Linwood Avenue and Commercial Drive underground or relocate them. 5-3-62 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 1 5.3 N Naples Bay I .N ETT4,AYE V -:E Sugden A- I r Regional Park HOMASSONDR ap es t Nap Botanical :_..--.--Garden . ..... Bayview:. .......... ......... TTFT 1111 1 11111 -7 Fa r�J, Jll . . ... .... . ..... .... A;. Property Parcel CRA Boundary Park vlf 47 b M, di. Wetlands Aj City of Naples ... ... ... .4w. 'A. :7 Map 5-3-15: Infrastructure Needs —Storm water, Roadway Engineering, Sanitary Sewer Electric Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-63 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS OEXISTING CONDITIONS •• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Water Infrastructure The City of Naples provides water and water infrastructure for the CRA area, which also supports fire suppression systems such as fire hydrants. The fire suppression infrastructure can influence the insurance ratings for an area. On a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the best), the CRA area currently has an Insurance Service Office (ISO) rating of 4. according to the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. In practice, the District typically assigns ratings of 4, 9, or 10. The City is currently in the process of upgrading neighborhood water lines to support hydrants for fire suppression. Areas highlighted in red on Map 5-3-16 indicate water mains that do not meet the standard fire flow requirements determined by the City of Naples' potable water model. These mains have potential for replacement to upgrade for fire flow improvements. However, note that other sections of the water mains in the CRA area are older and will need to be replaced eventually. There is continued interest on the part of the CRA to identify and obtain grants to complete this work in partnership with the City of Naples. 5-3-64 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 _x le, N J_ F7 I I � 1119H "1 '13 84 777" Ki v 0 Areas highlighted in red -�j indicate water mains that iddo not meet the standard i CF..... ..... fire flow requirements determined by the City of so Naples' potable water 41 model. These mains have ,h potential for replacement % j to upgrade for fire flow improvements. However, note that other sections of the water mains in the CRA f i!j area are older and will need to be replaced even- tually. Sugden STgA )Y\ Regional Park @MASSON DR LU 40 U, Naples— d, "Easta es Botanical mmunit y Garden Park ...... Bay,vi-eiw'_"_ ParkE:1 Ak. - Property Parcel CRA Boundary 462- ---- ...... ... . .. 0 Water Hydrant '7 yU A .... ...... — Mter Service Line m& Pressurized Water Main Park M `Wetlands ---- - -- . .. ..... . City of Naples _\tr D 7. 7-, 7 Al, E. Map 5-3-16: Water Infrastructure Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-65 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3.7 Process The substance of the CRA's planning and implementation is important, as is the way it carries out this planning and implementation. In view of the diversity of communities living and working in the CRA area, this section lays out a framework to carry out CRA area planning and implementation efforts to engage and serve the various communities within the CRA area. Objective 1: Improve approaches and tools for communicating with communities in the CRA area and the general public. • Strategy 1: As part of the marketing and communication strategy (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, Strategy 2), evaluate communication mechanisms and tools that will most effectively communicate with the various communities in the CRA area. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with schools and other • O GOAL •• • • • • • • • community partners to improve outreach and communication between the CRA and harder -to - reach populations. �5-3-660000'*0 Carry out CRA area planning and implementation efforts to engage and serve the various communities within the CRA area. • Strategy 3: Provide multi-lingual communications and materials. • Strategy 4: Create a CRA-specific Capital Improvement Plan to identify, prioritize, and effectively communication near -term capital improvements . Coordinate with MSTUs operating in the CRA area for relevant capital improvement projects. Objective 2: Ensure a targeted and balanced distribution of CRA planning and implementation efforts. • Strategy 1: Account for both need -based and geographic considerations in the distribution of planning and implementation efforts. • Strategy 2: Identify street blocks for targeted comprehensive improvements, with a focus on blocks that have already received some improvements and consideration for balanced distribution of these targeted blocks throughout the entire CRA area. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 • Strategy 3: Update rules and procedures for the CRA Advisory Board for legal consistency and with consideration given to a balanced distribution of planning/implementation efforts and diverse representation. Objective 3: Coordinate with MSTUs in the area and explore opportunities for new MSTUs. • Strategy 1: Incorporate Haldeman Creek and Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Boards into planning and implementation processes for CRA improvements. • Strategy 2: Explore the option of creating an MSTU for capital improvements in the Triangle area north of US 41. 5.3.8 Character Areas In addition to a diversity of communities in the CRA area, there is also a diversity of built character. This section tailors the thematic goals, objectives, and strategies of the previous sections to specific character areas within the CRA area as a whole. The character areas numbered on the Map 5-3-17 are defined by the land use characteristics discussed in the preceding maps. Key focus nodes, intersections, and corridors within the character areas that have potential for redevelopment are noted on the map with the asterisks and dotted lines. For each Character Area, a brief description is provided as well as a focus for redevelopment efforts to prioritize framework elements for each area. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-67 5.3 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: OMini Triangle/Davis • The Mini Triangle, including CRA-owned parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment opportunity and Focus Development Node • Corridor commercial along Davis • Linwood Avenue another potential area for redevelopment. 0 Airport Pulling • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big -box style retail, and County Center • Part of area currently designated as an Activity Center in Future Land Use Map © Windstar • Residential is primarily condos and single- family homes in gated communities • Includes golf course designated as a commercial use OSouth Bayshore • Primarily single-family residential neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development �5-3-680000'*0 © Shadowlawn • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix of apartments/duplexes and single-family homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area 0 Tamiami • Corridor commercial and residences, including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows) • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area ONorth Bayshore • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with neighborhood commercial (including Haldeman Creek Entertainment District near Creek) • Mix of multi- and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson with planned roundabout • CRA-owned Focus Development Node (17- Acre Site) ■ ■ ■ ■ Focus Corridor 0 Focus Development Node/Intersection Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 LINWOOD AVE � SS map5*-17:momcteAreas �� --V � 1 | / W Svnuen Regional Park � ' — 8ayshoreGateway Triangle CRAArea Plan —May 2019 j�5-3-69 5.3 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Focus of Redevelopment The following provides a focus of redevelopment for each Character Area based on the specific characteris- tics described for Map 5-3-17 and the most relevant strategies. 1. Mini Triangle/Davis • Urban -style mixed use commercial redevelop- ment, including capitalization on the Mini Triangle as a catalyst development site and urban -style parking solutions • Park development at retention pond site • Complete Streets design and commercial redevel- opment along Linwood Ave and other nearby commercial roadways; pedestrian scale street de- sign between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, and the proposed retention pond park • Improved access to Mini Triangle development from US 41, Davis Blvd, and Linwood Ave • Multi -modal connectivity: • Across Davis Blvd • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, pro- posed retention pond park, and eastern Triangle neighborhood • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge im- provements • Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary sewers, electrical, stormwater 2. Shadowlawn • Residential structural enhancement and upgrades • Avoidance of incompatible uses • Transitional elements between different uses • Infill development on vacant residential lots • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets • Complete Street improvements along Shadow - lawn Drive 3. Airport Pulling • Transitions between residential neighborhoods and commercial development • Eventual street enhancements, particularly con- nectivity across Airport Pulling Rd • Commercial fagade improvements 4. Tamiami • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 • Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows • Tenant opportunity at Gulfgate Plaza 5. Windstar • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along major community roadways, including Bayshore Drive, Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue • Access to Bayview Park 6. North Bayshore • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment District near Creek and creative parking solutions • Larger redevelopment opportunities of 17-Acre Site and Del's 24 property • Arts and culture -oriented development • Transitional elements between corridor commer- cial and residential areas in along Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive • Development of vacant residential lots • Complete Street design along Bayshore Drive and 5-3-70 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Thomasson Drive, including Bayshore Drive/ Thomasson Drive roundabout • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and CRA area • Water main and fire suppression upgrades • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets 7. South Bayshore • Mobile home and single-family home residential improvements, upgrades, affordability • Development of vacant residential lots • Access to Bayview Park • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, including East Naples Community Park • Wetland, flooding, and site preparation considera- tions for development • Roadway improvements to meet County engineer- ing standards • Neighborhood Complete Streets Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-3-71 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. 5-3-72 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 U111111,11 I I U-11111 U 91 ,4 r .AL Arl ik- w Yj .'tip ...'� `y 1 � � � 'R, . •� 5.4 a:1[111]:1[[PIIN-VA[to] ►■»_1►I 5.4.1 Prioritization of Projects & Initiatives The CRA will need to evaluate and implement or coordinate on a number of capital improvement projects and planning, administrative, and regulatory initiatives to carry out the framework of goals, objectives, and strategies presented in Section 5.3. Since these projects and initiatives cannot be evaluated and carried out all at once, this section presents a prioritization plan in terms of amount of funds programmed and project/initiative timing. A key consideration for prioritization is the amount of funding available for these projects and initiatives, discussed more in Section 5.4.2. Other prioritization criteria to consider that were primarily highlighted in the public outreach process include: Funding availability from dedicated or outside sources (aside from CRA funds) • Magnitude of anticipated impact and multiplier effects • Whether planning has already been undertaken or completed Other considerations that received sizable positive responses during the public outreach process included: • Project timing considerations independent of prioritization (e.g., Haldeman Creek dredging should account for timeframe of sediment build- up, a stormwater master plan should be completed before stormwater improvement projects) • Ability to address health/safety concerns Additional considerations recommended by the project team based on the Redevelopment Area Plan update process include: • Degree of need • Geographic distribution of projects in the CRA area • Priorities identified during public outreach for the Redevelopment Area Plan 5.4.2 Financing Plan An important revenue source over the next 11 years following plan approval is tax increment financing (TIF) revenue generated by the property within the CRA area. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area is able to use county ad valorem tax revenues generated above the base -year amount (the increment) to apply to projects and initiatives identified in this Redevelopment Area Plan. Figure 5-4-1 shows the historic revenue trends and projected revenues through 2030 based on a low growth scenario that follows the County's historic growth trends with a 5.2% assumed average annual growth rate, a medium growth scenario that assumes a 5.6% average annual growth rate, and a high growth scenario that assumes a 6.0% average annual growth rate. For more information on the development of growth scenarios, methods of revenue calculation, and detailed revenue tables, see Section 5.6. Certain parts of the CRA area are also designated as Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs), which utilize an additional ad valorem tax for specific purposes. The CRA can evaluate the opportunity to coordinate with the MSTUs to provide eligible projects proposed in this CRA plan. The Bayshore Beautification MSTU, created in 1997, applies to most of the CRA area south of US 41 (see Map 5-4-1); revenues from this tax are focused on streetscape and right-of-way improvements (including right-of-way maintenance), with some additional provisions for use of funds on other public realm improvements in the MSTU area. Figure 5-4-2 shows projected revenues through 2030 using the following average annual taxable value growth rate scenarios (see Section 5.6 for more information and detailed revenue tables): • Low:3.98% • Medium:4.18% • High:4.52% A Haldeman Creek MSTU (see Map 5-4-2) was created in 2006 for maintenance dredging and navigational marker maintenance within the MSTU boundary. Figure 5-4-3 shows projected revenues through 2030 using the following average annual taxable value Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 N A —DAVIS,BLVD— as :KIRKWOOD AVE LINWOOD AVE~ z . �. 40 - r _ 1 �, 41 4 Sugden Regional Pa rk 6:741 RE OR Naples Botanical Garden. yam: A, CRA Bo Bayshore 6eaulif"6ori MSTU Park Wetlands City of Naples . L A. .J , 4k, -aw Map 5-4-1: Boyshore Beautification MSTU Area Note: includes a boundary extension on Thomasson east of the CRA boundary that was pending approval during the development of this Redevelop- ment Area Plan. I Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 �5-4-2 5.4 1 a:1D]1.111PIIN-VAIto] ►E»_1►I 5-4-3 Base $5,000,000 Year $4,361,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,128,000 $$3,927,000 3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 —Low —Medium —High Figure 5-4-1: CRA TIF Revenue Scenarios Note: The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,490,000 — $2,306,000 $2,000,000 _ $2,134,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 —Low —Medium —High Figure 5-4-2: Bayshore Beautification MSTU Revenue Scenarios Note: The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $218,000 $202,000 $187,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Low Medium —High Figure 5-4-3: Haldeman Creek MSTU Revenue Scenarios Note: The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 ti —DAVIS BLVD — KIRKWOOD AVE cl LINWOOD AVE z KIRKWOOD LINWC 0 tj al 184 14 '7 L n 7 160 Noptes —BARRET-FAVE 1111io- lop r; *27 _0 ..LTHOMASSON DR Lu KAREN DR - a i'y ON Park ANDREWS AV j A, 4 'g, -- ----- ---- ... 71 0 ,J,.lit J, Map 5-4-2: Haldeman Creek MSTU Area Regional Park 5 "pie IS F - -7- CPA Bound<lry Kpidomm, Crook M$TU Park 4_ .7 Wetlands City of Naples .:m. 7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 f (15-474 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN growth rate scenarios (see Section 5.6 for more information and detailed revenue tables): • Low: 4.01% • Medium:4.21% • High:4.55% Note that the MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of the capital and non -capital planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Other potential funding sources that may be identified to supplement the funds above include grants and funding from partnerships (other agencies and private funders). There may also be opportunities in the future to take on additional debt to pay for capital projects with a plan for repayment; note however that no debt will be taken on for the purposes of future property acquisition, based on direction from the Board of County Commissioners. More information on coordination and partnerships, including those for funding opportunities, is discussed in Section 5.4.4. 5.4.3 Projects & Initiatives Prioritization Based on available funding and prioritization considerations, this section sets out a prioritization plan recommending projects for the period through 2030 (11 years after the adoption of the amended Plan), the period for which tax increment financing (TIF) funding will be available. The remaining project recommendations are included for longer term implementation post-2030 and will require alternative funding sources aside from TIF. The Plan provides an overview of potential alternative funding sources. This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects listed. It provides a guide and list of both capital and non -capital projects that require approval by the CRA Advisory Board within the initial 11-year programming period and allocation through the standard operating 0000 �5-4-5 and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners if TIF revenues are to be used for funding. Approval by relevant decision - making bodies is required for other funding sources outside of TIF. Projects may require additional vetting and piloting to better understand technical feasibility, impacts, and broader County implementation priorities prior to approval for implementation. To this end, planned projects include technical feasibility studies and pilot projects. As a result, this capital and non -capital funding plan is subject to change as it is re-evaluated. Additionally, the Plan sets a framework based on current conditions but also allows for flexibility in the phasing of projects based on funding opportunities and community priorities identified in annual work plans and capital improvement project lists. Table 5-4-1 summarizes total projected revenues for various funds operating in the CRA area (including MSTUs) through 2030. Note that following the successful sale of the Mini Triangle property anticipated in the first five years, it is expected that the CRA will have additional funds of $350,000 available that are currently being held in reserve due to loan requirements. Figures 5-4-4 and 5-4-5 summarize capital and non - capital project costs broken down by timeframe and type of project/initiative, followed by Tables 5-4-2 through 5-4-4 which provide a detailed list of projects and initiatives. Table 5-4-5 compares projected TIF revenues and costs. Note that the planning includes a built-in deficit to indicate where other agencies would likely help fund projects or other revenue sources might be sought, including once the TIF revenues cease in 2030. Regarding maintenance costs, maintenance of standard capital improvements is anticipated to be provided and funded by relevant County agencies, while maintenance for capital Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 improvements above and beyond County standards are anticipated to be funded by the CRA. • Short Term (1-5 Years) Capital Projects Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase I — major • Complete Street improvement between Commercial Dr and Wild Pines Ln including on- • street parking, lighting, sidewalk widening, and any additional needed infrastructure improvements Thomasson Dr and Hamilton Ave Improvements — • Bayshore Beautification MSTU anticipated to fund project, but any shortfall could trigger partnership with CRA funding portion Republic Dr Complete Streets Improvements — neighborhood -level Complete Streets improvements between Bayshore Dr and East Naples Community Park, including lighting, possible sidewalk expansion, any necessary drainage improvements, and an improved pedestrian bridge connection to East Naples Community Park Danford St Complete Streets Improvements — neighborhood -level Complete Streets improvements between the end of the roadway and Hamilton Ave General Parks Improvements in Bayshore Area — general item to address connections to parks and amenities, including any associated with the 17- Acre Site and Sugden Regional Park Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements —general item to address capital improvements from Community Safety & Clean -Up Strategy and Neighborhood Focus Initiatives; may include projects identified based on neighborhood interest to coordinate with the Sheriff's Department and Code Enforcement to educate and provide small capital improvements Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust —may support maintenance of current affordable housing • availability in the CRA area while improving baseline quality conditions; may also support housing for artists Bay St Complete Street Improvements — neighborhood -level Complete Streets improvements between Hamilton Ave and the end of the roadway Surface Parking Lot in Bayshore Area —to increase available commercial parking General Road Engineering Improvements on Pine Tree Dr and Andrews Dr — to bring these roadways up to minimum County standards Jeepers Dr Complete Street Improvements — neighborhood Complete Streets improvements between Bayshore Dr and Sugden Regional Park, including walk lane striping, upgraded bioswales, lighting, and a pedestrian connection to Sugden Regional Park Gateway Intersection Design Improvements: • Davis Blvd/Airport-Pulling Rd • Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr • Davis Blvd/US 41 • US 41/Shadowlawn Dr/Bayshore Dr —sign improvements in the right-of-way and median areas with an opportunity to showcase public art Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements in CRA area — signs to address branding and bicycle/pedestrian movement Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program — program to address gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure networks that are not addressed through Complete Streets improvements Other General Multi -Modal Improvements —for additional multi -modal amenities (e.g., bus shelters) Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ Improvements Sanitary Sewer Line Upgrades in Triangle Area —to increase capacity Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades —to address infrastructure age and flow requirements Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-4-6 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN Non -Capital Expenditures • Ongoing Operating Expenses for CRA, including staff and administration costs • Process Improvements — updated bylaws for CRA Advisory Board • Land Development Code Updates- based on recommendations from CRA Plan Update • Mini Triangle Development — funding for incentives and other needed support for the development of the Mini Triangle • 17-Are Development —funding for incentives and other needed support for the development of the 17-Acre Site. • • Gateway Property Development —funding for potential incentive in support of the project at the apex of Davis Boulevard and Us 41. • Stormwater Master Plan Update — identify primary, secondary, and tertiary improvements needed in the CRA area with a prioritization plan • Arts and Culture Plan for CRA Area • Complete Streets Implementation Plan • Bayview Parking Study — concepts and outreach in coordination with Parks & Recreation Division • Community Safety & Cleanup Strategy —strategy to address code enforcement issues and community • safety • Branding Strategy • Marketing and Communication Strategy— • strategies to communicate outcomes from the branding effort and connect with the various communities in the CRA area (including hard -to - reach groups) with updated tools including the • website, e-blast templates, marketing materials, etc. Market Study/Economic Profile Bayshore Dr Pilot project —for Complete Street implementation Water & Fire Update Strategy — documentation of what mains and hydrants will be updated and phasing Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study —finalized design and engineering for passive park improvements Other Non -Capital Operations and Study Expenditures —may include a study to expand the CRA boundary, non -capital costs associated with Community Safety & Clean -Up Plan, non -capital costs from Neighborhood Focus Initiatives, or other expenditures that may arise in the future and are not yet identified. Grants and Programs • Residential Grant/Loan Programs —for structural improvements to single-family homes • Commercial Fapade Program —for areas that are not a major focus for commercial redevelopment but that can be enhanced with exterior fagade and structural improvements • Wall & Fence Funding —for transitional structures between incompatible uses Public Art Funding —for public art pieces and events Economic Development Incentives Program —for economic development incentives related to Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan Bayshore Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study Mobile Home Replacement Fund - for transition of mobile homes to modular homes or other appropriate structures Community Land Trust Housing Construction Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments 5-4-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Long -Term (After 11 Years) Capital Projects • Triangle Retention Pond Improvements - implementation of passive park improvements at the pond site with any necessary drainage and connectivity improvements • Land Acquisition and Development for Six Pocket Parks (small neighborhood parks) • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements • Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust • Surface Parking Lot in the Mini Triangle area to support commercial uses • Development of Multi -Purpose Facility/Structure— may occur on currently CRA-owned 17-Acre Site; potential uses of the facility/structure may include a CRA office and/or arts/incubator space • Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail - along Sugden Regional Park Drainage Ditch to provide north/ south connectivity • Commercial Parking Garage on Bayshore Dr - possibly on surface lot included in short-term capital projects for commercial parking • Bayshore Dr Complete Street — major Complete Street improvement between US 41 and Thomasson Dr, including possible lane reduction, on -street parking, and any additional needed infrastructure improvements • Kirkwood Ave Complete Street —Complete Street improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave Phase I with potential Shadowlawn Dr connection • Commercial Dr Complete Street —Complete Street improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave Phase I • Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase II — neighborhood Complete Street improvements between Wild Pines Ln and Airport -Pulling Rd • Shadowlawn Dr Complete Street — major roadway Complete Street improvement between Davis Blvd and US 41, including lighting and any additional needed infrastructure improvements • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements — signage and potential public art opportunities for: • Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr • US 41/Osceola Ave • General Road Engineering Improvements —to bring the following roads up to minimum County standards: • Woodside Ave • Holly Ave • Palmetto Ct • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program • Other General Multi -Modal Improvements • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades —to address age and flow requirements • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ Improvements • Undergrounding Utilities —along Bayshore Dr between US 41 and Holly Ave, coordinated with the Complete Streets project and Bayshore Beautification MSTU; Linwood Ave; and Commercial Dr • Bayshore Dr Complete Street Improvement between Thomasson Dr and Holly Ave — neighborhood -level Complete Street, including any drainage improvements and connections to potential Naples Bay Greenway Sun Trail improvements • Commercial Parking Garage in Mini Triangle Area possibly on Surface Lot included in Mid -Term Capital Projects —to address commercial parking needs • Pine Street Connection —between Davis Blvd and Linwood Ave Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-4-8 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN Non -Capital Expenditures • Land Development Code Updates • Bayshore Dr Technical Feasibility Study — for Complete Street implementation • Microenterprise and Arts Incubator Study —for concepts and implementation, which could include an arts focus and/or arts space • Other Non -Capital Operations and Study Expenditures —other expenditures that may arise in the future and are not yet identified • Grants and Programs • Residential Grant/Loan Programs —for structural improvements to single-family homes • Commercial Fagade Program — for areas that are not a major focus for commercial redevelopment but that can be enhanced with exterior facade and structural improvements • Wall & Fence Funding —for transitional structures between incompatible uses • Public Art Funding —for public art pieces and events • Economic Development Incentives Program —for economic development incentives related to Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan • Mobile Home Replacement Fund - for transition of mobile homes to modular homes or other appropriate structures • Community Land Trust Housing Construction • Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments op 5-4-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) $33,790,000 $0 Bayshore Beautification MSTU $20,193,000 TBD Haldeman Creek MSTU $1,762,000 TBD Table 5-4-1: Summary of Projected Revenue Estimates Note: rounded to thousands 'The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Total Short -Term Costs (1-11 Years): $34.4 million Land Use & Urban Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Design. S165.000. 0% $1,050,000, 3% Figure 5-4-4: Short-term costs by project type Total Long -Term Costs (After 11 Years): $85.1 million Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Land Use & 3,144,404, 4% Urban Design, Development, Non -Capital, $37,500, 0% $4,062,500, 5% $6,735,000 , 89/. -- Infrastructure, $25,909,865, 30% Figure 5-4-5: Long-term costs by project type Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-4-10 5.4 a:1D]1.111PIIN-VAIto] ►■»_1►I L and Use & Urban=North of US 41 (Triangle) LL SVMIS (After 11 Years)' Gateway Intersection Design Improvements Gateway Sign - Davis Blvd/Airport Pulling Rd $15,000 $15,000 Gateway Sign - Davis Blvd/ Shadowlawn Dr $15,000 $15,000 Gateway Sign - Davis Blvd/US 41 $15,000 $15,000 Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements Wayfinding Sign Improvements $52,500 $52,500 Sub -Total $97,500 $97,500 $0 Lubric .. Open Space (After 11 Years)' Park Improvements Triangle Retention Pond Improvements $818,049 $818,049 Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks (2 parks) $937,500 $937,500 Development of Pocket Parks (2 parks) $163,178 $163,178 Public Space Improvements Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements $87,500 $25,000 $62,500 Sub -Total $2,006,227 $25,000 $1,981,227 Table 5-4-2: Capital Improvements Project Matrix —North of US 41 (Triangle) 5-4-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Transportation, (After 11 Years)' Complete Streets - Major Linwood Ave (Phase 1) $1,674,075 $1,674,075 Shadowlawn Dr - Installation of Streetlights $412,500 $412,500 Commercial Dr $1,903,219 $1,903,219 Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection $2,177,813 $2,177,813 Pine Street Connection $2,210,891 $2,210,891 Complete Streets & Trails - Neighborhood Linwood Ave (Phase 11) $2,224,400 $2,224,400 Parking Surface Parking Lot - Land Acquisition $937,500 $937,500 Surface Parking Lot — Mini Triangle Area - excludes land acquisition cost $439,113 $439,113 Commercial Parking Garage (possibly on surface lot) — Triangle - excludes land acquisition cost $11,898,125 $11,898,125 General Multi -Modal Improvements General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements $2,775,449 $430,622 $2,344,827 Other General Multi -Modal Improvements $875,000 $250,000 $625,000 Sub -Total $27,528,083 $2,354,697 $25,173,386 Infrastructure Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) Long -Term (After 11 Years)' Other Infrastructure Improvements Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/Improvements $7,218,750 $250,000 $6,968,750 Underground Utility Lines - Linwood Ave $896,070 $896,070 Underground Utility Lines - Commercial Dr $237,926 $237,926 Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades $4,836,303 $482,801 $4,353,502 Sub -Total $14,189,049 $1,732,801 $12,456,248 Total North $44,945,859 $4,709,998 $40,235,861 ' Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases Table 5-4-2 (continued): Capital Improvements Project Matrix —North of US 41 (Triangle) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-4-12 5.4 a:1D]1.111PIIN-VAIto] ►■»_1►I Land Use & UrbanSouth of US 41 (Bayshore) After 11 Years)' Gateway Intersection Design Improvements Gateway Sign Improvements at US 41 and Bayshore3 $15,000 $15,000 Gateway - Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr $18,750 $18,750 Gateway US 41/Osceola3 $18,750 $18,750 Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements Wayfinding Sign Improvements3 $52,500 $52,500 Sub -Total $105,000 $67,500 $37,500 Space,Public Open Space (After 11 Years)' Park Improvements Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks (2 parks) $937,500 $937,500 Development of Pocket Parks (2 parks) $163,178 $163,178 General Parks Development/Improvements $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Public Space Improvements Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements $87,500 $25,000 $62,500 Sub -Total $2,188,178 $1, 025, 000 $1,163,178 Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust 1 $1,125,0001 $500,0001 $625,000 Development of Multi -Purpose Facility/Structure 1 $2,812,5001 1 $2,812,500 Sub -Total 1 $3,937,5001 $500,0001 $3,437,500 Table 5-4-3: Capital Improvements South of US 41 (Bayshore) op 5-4-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 tion, Connectivity, & Walkability Projects Short Term (1-11 Long -Term F Complete Streets - Major Bayshore Dr Complete Street — between US 41 and $3,125,000 $3,125,000 ThomassonZ Thomason Dr and Hamilton ImprovementsZ $500,000 $500,000 Complete Streets & Trails - Neighborhood Bicycle and pedestrian trail along Sugden drainage $428,340 $428,340 ditch Jeepers Dr Complete Street ImprovementsZ $491,849 $491,849 Republic Dr Complete Streets improvementsZ $506,849 $506,849 Danford St Complete StreetsZ $689,329 $689,329 Bay St Complete Street ImprovementsZ $491,849 $491,849 Bayshore Dr Complete Street - Thomasson Dr/Holly $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Ave Parking Surface Parking Lot at Bayshore and Coco $351,290 $351,290 Commercial Parking Garage (possibly on surface lot) $9,893,500 $9,893,500 — Bayshore Dr General Road Engineering Standard Improvements General Road Engineering Improvements — Pine Tree $346,649 $346,649 Dr General Road Engineering Improvements - Andrews $346,649 $346,649 Dr General Road Engineering Improvements - Woodside $433,312 $433,312 Ave Z General Road Engineering Improvements - Holly $433,312 $433,312 Ave General Road Engineering Improvements - Palmetto $213,371 $213,371 CtZ General Multi -Modal Improvements General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure $2,775,449 $430,622 $2,344,827 ImprovementsZ Other General Multi -Modal ImprovementsZ $875,000 $250,000 $625,000 Sub -Total $24,401,748 $4,405,088 $19,996,660 Table 5-4-3 (continued): Capital Improvements South of US 41 (Bayshore) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-4-14 5.4 a:1D]1.111PIIN-VAIto] ►■»_1►I Infrastructure Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) Long -Term (After 11 Years)' Other Infrastructure Improvements Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/Improvements2 $5,250,000 $250,000 $5,000,000 Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades $7,221,510 $1,542,894 $5,678,617 Underground Utility Lines - Bayshore Dr $2,775,000 $2,775,000 Sub -Total $15,246,510 $1,792,894 $13,453,617 Total South $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Overall Capital Costs Total $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Non -Capital Costs Total $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total Costs $119,440,911 $34,381,595 $85,059,316 1 Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases 2 Potentially MSTU-eligible project; requires coordination and approval of Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Board. Table 5-4-3 (continued): Capital Improvements South of US 41 (Bayshore) 5-4-15 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Other)Non-Capital Expenditures (Studies, Plans, Operations and Studies Project M Short Term Long -Term T-91 (1-11 Years) (After 11 Years)' Process Improvements - updated bylaws for CRA Advisory Board $25,000 $25,000 Staff and Operating (salaries, benefits, rent, etc.)Z $16,626,116 $16,626,116 Land Development Code Updates- based on recommendations from CRA Plan Update $100,000 $75,000 $25,000 Mini Triangle Development Support $500,000 $500,000 17-Acre Development Support $500,000 $500,000 Gateway Property Support $100,000 $100,000 Stormwater Master Plan Update $200,000 $200,000 Arts and Culture Plan for CRA $75,000 $75,000 Complete Streets Implementation Plan $50,000 $50,000 Bayview Parking Study - concepts and outreach in coordination with Parks & Recreation Division $25,000 $25,000 Community Safety & Cleanup Strategy to address code enforcement issues and community safety. $15,000 $15,000 Marketing, Branding and communication strategy - website update, a -blast templates, marketing materials, etc. $50,000 $50,000 Market Study/Economic Profile $50,000 $50,000 Bayshore Drive Technical Feasibility Study $40,000 $40,000 Bayshore Drive Pilot project $15,000 $15,000 Water & Fire Update Strategy - document what mains and hydrants will be updated and phasing $50,000 $50,000 Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study $25,000 $25,000 Microenterprise and arts incubator Study for concepts and implementation $20,000 $20,000 Other non -capital operations and study expenditures $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 Grants and Programs Residential Grant/Loan Programs -for structural improvements to single- family homes $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 Commercial Fa;ade Program $750,000 $250,000 $500,000 Wall & Fence Funding -for funding transitional structures between incompatible uses $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 Public Art -funding for public art pieces and events $225,000 $75,000 $150,000 Economic Development - funding for economic development incentives listed in Development Section $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 Mobile Home Replacement Fund $1,500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 Community Land Trust Housing Construction $4,800,000 $1,800,000 $3,000,000 Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments $1,250,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 Totals $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 1 Assumes a 25% cast increase to account inflation and other potential cost increases z Assumes no staff and operating costs after the end of the TIF collection period in 2030 Table 5-4-4: Non Capital Expenditures Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 5.4 a:1W1.111PIIN-VAIto] ►E»_1►I Funding Summary Total Capital Costs - North of US 41 (Triangle) OverallTIF Total $44,945,859 (1-11 Years) $4,709,998 (After 11 Years)' $40,235,861 Total Capital Costs - South of US 41 (Bayshore) $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Total Capital Costs $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Total Non -Capital Costs $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total TIF Revenue $33,790,000 $33,790,000 $0 Difference -$85,650,911 -$591,595 -$85,059,316 Table 5-4-5: Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues Notes: revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases. The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years 5.4.4 Coordination & Partnerships Many of the items listed in the Section 5.3 framework and capital and non -capital projects listed in this section require the CRA to seek approval from and coordinate with other agencies and entities, which may include planning and process approval and/or coordination and identifying opportunities for shared funding. Coordination also includes instances in which another agency or entity oversees a project or initiative directly with the CRA assisting. As mentioned in Section 5.4.3, the framework and projects identified in this plan are suggestions to be further vetted prior to approval for implementation. This includes review and approval from relevant County staff and elected officials. Planning and implementation may also include broader coordination with agencies. Examples include coordination with the Collier MPO to share local needs that might inform a state roadway improvement, as well as coordinating with other Collier County agencies on topics such as Land Development Code changes, park access, community safety, transit and transportation, and stormwater. The CRA also has opportunities to coordinate with the City of Naples on transportation planning and water main upgrades. This type of coordination might involve design review for projects led by the CRA and setting up meetings coinciding with regular planning and project cycles prior to finalized design phases. Key planning cycles for coordination include the Transportation Improvement Program planning by the MPO and capital improvement planning for Collier County. When working with agencies to identify shared funding opportunities as a part of these planning and implementation processes, it is important to recognize existing funding commitments, as well as limitations on the use of funds. For example, road impact fees in Collier County must be used for capacity expansion, such as adding a new road or new lanes to an existing road. 5-4-17 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Aside from government agencies, the CRA may also have opportunities to partner with local entities such as private firms and non -profits to realize some of its strategies and projects, as well as seek private sponsorships Examples include potentially partnering with the Naples Accelerator, St. Matthew's House, and/or the United Arts Council on a business/art incubator idea. There may also be opportunities to partner with companies such as Slidr for alternative vehicle transportation in the area. Coordination and funding opportunities may also be identified as part of private development projects. Lastly, as mentioned at the beginning of this section, the CRA should look for opportunities to coordinate with the MSTUs operating in the area to implement capital improvements. Table 5-4-6 shows the costs for projects in the CRA prioritization plan that may qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds and compares them to the projected revenues for the MSTU through 2030; note that revenues beyond this timeframe are considered "to be determined" depending on when the projects are implemented. The comparison shows that the money available would cover these project costs with a sizable amount of funds remaining for other MSTU projects. Note that the MSTU Advisory Board would need to approve any process or funding coordination. Table 5-4-6: Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues Note: Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds ac- cording to Ordinance No. 2013-68; revenues rounded to thousands 1Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases 2The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projec- tions have been made for years after 2030. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-4-18 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 00000 �5-4-19 This page is intentionally left blank. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 Ni ;I3IIIIC f,- ij, qwA,- 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.5.1 Overview of Relevant Statutes Community redevelopment areas are created on the basis of a finding of blight or slum conditions, as noted in Section 163.355 of Florida Statute. Table 5-2-1 provided detailed blight conditions for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area, summarizing information from the 2000 Plan. Table 5-5-1 shows how the framework in this Redevelopment Area Plan addresses the main blight factors identified. Related capital and non -capital projects can also be found in Section 5.4. In addition, sections 163.360 and 163.362 of Florida Statutes contain specific requirements for community redevelopment plans. Tables 5-5-2 and 5-5-3 provide an overview of the requirements from these statutes and the location in this Redevelopment Area Plan where the relevant information can be found to satisfy these requirements. 5.5.2 Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan This Redevelopment Area Plan sets forth a vision for the CRA area centered on fostering more urban -style development, including multi -modal corridors, mixed use projects, and building out to allowable densities. The Collier County Growth Management Plan largely supports this vision with the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay provisions and the Activity Center designation. The Mixed Use overlays provided in the Land Development Code further support these efforts. Development and redevelopment are thus largely intended to be completed within the provisions of the Growth Management Plan as they exist now or indicate where future amendments may be needed in order to carry out implementation of action items. 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/ Clearance, & Improvement In the future, the Redevelopment Agency may choose to pursue a program of property acquisition and/or consolidation to realize the redevelopment objectives. These objectives might relate to facilitating private development and providing identified needed public uses. If a property is designated for acquisition, the process must comply with County requirements and/ or State statutes. The Redevelopment Agency is authorized to demolish, clear, or move buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property acquired in the redevelopment project area, subject to obtaining necessary permits. The CRA may also engage in or assist in site preparation improvements on properties it already owns or properties it acquires in the future to facilitate development. Other improvements include general infrastructure and streetscape improvements that indirectly support development. See Section 5.4.3 for those improvements that are planned for the CRA to fund. All of these improvements are subject to obtaining necessary permits. Section 1.5 further outlines the Agency's authorities that governs this area. 5.5.4 Zoning & Comprehensive Plan Changes No Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code changes were brought through an approval process as part of this planning effort, and no Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes are being adopted with the adoption of this Redevelopment Area Plan. However, recommended changes will be brought for initial consistency review by Collier County staff and the Collier County Planning Commission following adoption of this plan. 5.5.5 Land Use, Densities, & Building Requirements As noted in Section 5.5.4, no Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes are being adopted with the adoption of this Redevelopment Area Plan. Consequently, the Redevelopment Area Plan will follow the land uses, densities, and building requirements provided in the Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Code for the time being. However, recommended changes will be brought forth for initial consistency review by Collier 5-5-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.5 Predominance of Section 5.3.5 addresses street design primarily with Complete Streets initiatives; defective or inadequate there are additional improvements for addressing bicycle and pedestrian gaps, street layout commercial parking need, and additional bicycle and pedestrian connections. Faulty lot layout in Section 5.3.4 focuses on specifically on facilitating private development. As part of relation to size, these efforts, the CRA can acquire property to merge lots and make them more adequacy, accessibility, easily developed. Additionally, Section 5.3.2 lays out examples of multi -family or usefulness residential that provide examples to achieve higher residential densities where approved densities are not realized. Sections 5.3.3 and 5.3.4 contain strategies to address structural upgrades and public Unsanitary or unsafe realm clean-up and improvements. Sections 5.3.2 and 5.3.4 also address residential conditions types and approaches to affordability that can address overcrowding. Section 5.3.5 highlights lighting and other transportation safety improvements, particularly for cyclists and pedestrians. Deterioration of site or other improvements Section 5.3.6 focuses on infrastructure improvements, including those for (drainage and surface stormwater. water management) Other problems: Lack of right-of-way for Section 5.3.5 includes improvements for Shadowlawn Drive. Shadowlawn Drive improvements Other problems: Lack of Section 5.3.5 includes a coordination strategy for public transit in the CRA area. public transportation Other problems: housing Section 5.3.4 includes example strategies to address housing affordability issues. affordability Table 5-5-1: Sections of Redevelopment Area Plan that address blight conditions Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-5-2 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Conformity to the Growth Management Plan Zoning and planning changes Section 5.5.2 Section 5.5.4 Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5- Land uses, maximum densities, and building requirements 3-6, Section 5.5.5; for general considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 Land acquisition, demolition, clearance and site preparation, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation proposed to carry out Sections 5.4.3 and 5.5.3 the Redevelopment Area Plan Affordable housing provision Table 5-5-2: Section 163.350, F.S. Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan Section 5.3.4- Objective 5 5-5-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.5 Legal description of CRA area boundaries and reason behind establishing Resolution 2000-82, Exhibit A at such boundaries end of this document and Resolution 2000-83 Approximate amount of open space to be provided shown by diagram and Section 5.3.3-Table 5-3-1 and in general terms Map 5-3-8 Property intended for parks and recreation space shown by diagram and in Section 5.3.3-Map 5-3-8 general terms Street layout and property intended for streets shown by diagram and in Section 5.3.5-Map 5-3-14 general terms Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5- Limitations on the type, size, height, number, and proposed use of 3-6, Section 5.5.5; for general buildings shown by diagram and in general terms considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 The approximate number of dwelling units shown by diagram and in general terms Section 5.3.2-Map 5-3-2 Replacement housing and relocation Section 5.3.4, Section 6 Property intended for public utilities shown by diagram and in general Section 5.3.6-Maps 5-3-15 and 5 terms -3-16 Section 5.3.1-Map 5-3-1, Section 5.4.2; additional details Property for public improvements of any nature shown by diagram and in in Section 5.3.2-Map 5-3-7, general terms Section 5.3.3-Map 5-3-8, Section 5.3.4-Map 5-3-10, Section 5.3.5- Maps 5-3-12 and 5-3-14, Section 5.3.6-Maps 5-3-15 and 5-3-16 Neighborhood impact element describing impacts on residents of CRA area and surrounding areas in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, Section 5.5.6 effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood Publicly funded capital improvements to be undertaken in the CRA area Section 5.4.2 Safeguards, controls, restrictions/covenants Section 5.5.7 Replacement housing for relocation of displaced persons from housing Section 6 facilities Residential use element Section 5.3.2, Section 5.3.4- Objective 5 Projected costs of redevelopment Section 5.4.3 Redevelopment Area Plan duration and time certain for redevelopment Section 1.6 financed by increment revenues Table 5-5-3: Section163.362, F.S. Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 / l/ 5-5-4 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS County staff and the Collier County Planning Commission. 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact The Redevelopment Area Plan focuses on improving structural quality of buildings, compatibility of uses, and urban design, as well as promoting more urban - style development and multi -modal transportation. As of right now, there is housing available at lower income levels, yet this may be due to lower structural quality based on findings from the background analysis for the Redevelopment Area Plan. As improvements are made in the area, there is a potential risk of property values rising to make housing substantially less affordable. Consequently, protective measures are being considered to maintain the affordability of these units while improving their quality (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 5). Temporary relocation of residents in lower quality units may be required to make building improvements. An additional consideration for lower income households with improvements to the CRA area is the availability of community facilities and services. These uses may also risk displacement if property values increase rapidly or dramatically. This Redevelopment Area Plan includes provisions to support community - oriented uses that include these facilities and services so that they can remain a part of the community (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy 2). With more urban -style development and multi -modal improvements, traffic circulation may change. There may be increased congestion on roadways and at major state road intersections in making them safer for non - automobile modes and pursuing catalyst development opportunities. Any development would need to go through the existing Collier County process to assess and mitigate for Level of Service changes on roadways. Ensuring low-cost transportation alternatives may also support affordable mobility for lower income households and community members. Regarding impacts on other facilities, such as schools, any new development would need to go through the existing Collier County process to assess and mitigate for Level of Service changes. Regarding environmental quality, water quality is a key consideration for stormwater management improvements. Water quality impacts can be evaluated through existing Collier County processes. Additionally, this Redevelopment Area Plan encourages green infrastructure techniques that may help provide certain levels of localized water treatment and ground infiltration prior to arriving at major collector sites. 5.5.7 Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & Assurances Redevelopment activities identified in this Redevelopment Area Plan will not be initiated until they are found to be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and applicable land development regulations. The Community Redevelopment Agency, working collaboratively with County agencies, may propose amendments to the Growth Management Plan and the Land Use Development Code, including design criteria, building heights, land coverage, setback requirements, special exceptions, traffic circulation, traffic access, and other development and design controls necessary for proper development of public and private projects. To leverage the increment revenues, Collier County may consider non -ad valorem assessments. For example, during the Redevelopment Area Plan update process, the County was working on a stormwater utility fee that, if adopted, would apply to the CRA area. The imposition of special assessments for capital improvements and essential services is covered by well settled case law and specific statutory provisions authorizing collection of non -ad valorem assessments on the same bill as ad valorem taxes. Such provisions require extraordinary notice to all affected property owners. Issues concerning restrictions on any property acquired for community redevelopment purposes and then returned to use by the private sector will be addressed 5-5-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.5 on a case -by -case basis to ensure all activities necessary to perpetuate the redevelopment initiative are advanced in a manner consistent with this Redevelopment Area Plan and any amendment to it. Such restrictions or controls would be expected in the form of covenants on any land sold or leased for private use as provided for in the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.380, F.S. To assure that redevelopment will take place in conformance with the projects, objectives and strategies expressed in this Redevelopment Area Plan, the Redevelopment Agency will utilize the regulatory mechanisms used by the County to permit development and redevelopment within its jurisdiction. These mechanisms include but are not limited to the Growth Management Plan; the Land Development Code; adopted design guidelines; performance standards; and County -authorized development review, permitting, and approval processes and any other adopted codes, standards, and policies. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-5-6 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. 5-5-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 Vl TAX INCREMENT 8 MSTU ESTIMATES cry,-.� q��; • ..:� • -,r�s . � . 4,. •„ *�, .ter . � , 506 I., 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6.1 Tax Increment Financing The Redevelopment Area is dependent upon the use of increment revenue financing for funding. Using this method, the County froze all taxable values within the Redevelopment Area at the 2000 rate to establish a base collection amount. Millages are applied through the General Fund (001) and the Unincorporated Area General Fund (111). The future taxes collected (associated with tax base and property value increases) are placed into a separate account and designated for specific uses. The funds can be dedicated to transportation or general improvements, or placed in the general fund with the base ad valorem revenues. The analysis is based on the historical tax roll data obtained from the Florida Department of Revenue (FDOR) and population projections for Collier County obtained from the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR). Specific increases in the tax base are shown in terms of expected development and its value. This expected development is based exclusively on past patterns of activity adjusted for anticipated community redevelopment activities within the Redevelopment Area. These programmatic assumptions offer a baseline for comparison with future potential development. For this analysis, the Bayshore CRA's current millage rates have been used, and were held constant over the planning horizon. As for the structure of the revenues which may accrue, only the taxable value(s) net of the base year taxable value is considered in calculating current or future increment revenues. The general procedures used to calculate available revenues are shown in the following calculations: • Assessed values, including new construction — Exemptions or exclusions = Current taxable values. Current taxable values — Established base year taxable values = Net valuations subject to applicable jurisdictional millages. Net valuations x by applicable millages = increment revenues. Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.387, F.S., the maximum revenue available to the Redevelopment Trust Fund will be 95 percent of the calculated increment revenues. Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. The conference produces detailed projections of the "County Taxable Value" for each county in Florida. The values projected by EDR were used for each CRA tax increment scenario with the low, medium, high growth scenarios starting in 2025. For projection purposes past 2025, three different scenarios were developed that reflect different future growth rates for taxable values in the Redevelopment Area. Additional details for each scenario are presented below and in Tables 5-6-1 through 5-6-3. Scenario #1 Ad valorem revenues associated with the increment revenue financing for the Redevelopment Area were estimated using the projected growth of the taxable values for residential and non-residential developments. The average taxable values were indexed annually based on the positive correlation between population growth and taxable value increases discussed previously, along with the historical growth trends of taxable values in the Redevelopment Area, by land use. Based on these projections, if the current millage is held constant (3.5645 mils for fund 001 and 0.8069 mils for fund 111), the ad valorem taxes used for the Redevelopment Area fund are estimated to generate approximately $33.8 million between through 2030. Additional growth scenarios are presented in this report that reflects more aggressive growth rates in taxable values and potential revenues. Although more aggressive than the growth rates in Scenario #1, these scenarios still present revenue projections that can reasonably be obtained. Since 1976, the taxable value for residential property in Collier County has averaged a 10 percent annual increase, and commercial property has averaged a 9 percent annual increase. Within the CRA, taxable values (all property) have averaged a 5 percent annual increase. 0000 5-6-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 Scenario #2 Scenario #2 reflects increased growth rates that are consistent with the historical growth rates in taxable values for the entire CRA area. This scenario estimates slightly higher taxable value growth than Scenario #1, with a projected average annual taxable value growth rate of 5.6 percent (as opposed to Scenario #1 at S.2 percent). As CRA properties are redeveloped, it is reasonable to assume that taxable values will increase at or above historical growth rates. Using these higher annual growth rates, the Scenario #2 increment revenue financing option would generate approximately $34.3 million through 2030. Scenario #3 Additionally, an optimistic growth rate scenario was developed. Scenario #3 has increased growth rates that are more than Scenarios #1 and #2, bringing the average growth rate for all land uses more in line with the recent growth rates of the entire county seen over the last few years. This scenario projects the growth in taxable values for all property to average approximately 6.0 percent, annually. Using these rates, the increment revenue financing option generated approximately $35.1 million through 2030. For each of the following scenarios, the following apply: • Projected total taxable value of all properties within Redevelopment Area. Projected growth rates by land use are consistent with historical growth rates observed between 2000 and 2018 within Redevelopment Area. All figures rounded to nearest thousand. • Difference between total taxable value (Item 1) for each year and base year (2000). • For projection purposes, millage rates are assumed to remain the same through 2030. • Increment revenue by year (Item 2), divided by 1,000, multiplied by total millage rate, and reduced by 5 percent for budgeting purposes. 5.6.2 Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs) There are two MSTUs that overlap with the CRA area — the Bayshore Beautification MSTU and the Haldeman Creek MSTU. The Bayshore Beautification MSTU was created to provide certain streetscape and right-of-way improvements in the CRA area generally south of US 41. The Haldeman Creek MSTU was created for maintenance dredging and navigational marker maintenance. Projected revenues for these two MSTUs use a similar approach as described for the TIF calculations above. Note that revenues stem directly from millages (as opposed to an increment difference with a base year as in the case of the TIF revenues). Additionally, the MSTU growth percentages are based on projected growth for the land use mix in the area, resulting in different average annual taxable value growth rate percentages than those in the TIF scenarios. The percentages used are: Bayshore: • Low:3.98% • Medium:4.18% • High:4.52% Haldeman Creek: • Low: 4.01% • Medium:4.21% • High:4.55% See Tables 5-6-4 through 5-6-6 for Bayshore Beautification MSTU projected revenues and 5-6-7 through 5-6-9 for Haldeman Creek MSTU projected revenues. Note that the project planning in Section 5.4 showed revenues only through 2030 since this period had a given timeframe; the tables in this section show projected revenues out to 2048 to give a sense of future revenues, although any long-term post-2030 funding opportunities would need to be determined based on actual project implementation timing. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-6-2 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES MEJJJJWL F�� . 001 Total 2018 $701,076,000 $412,995,000 - - - 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,047,610,000 $759,529,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,093,898,000 $805,817,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,572,000 $582,000 $3,154,000 2027 $1,139,554,000 $851,473,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,729,000 $618,000 $3,347,000 2028 $1,186,165,000 $898,084,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,883,000 $653,000 $3,536,000 2029 $1,233,732,000 $945,651,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,041,000 $688,000 $3,729,000 2030 - - 3.5645 0.8069 $3,202,000 $725,000 $3,927,000 Total $27,553,000 $6,237,000 $33,790,000 Table 5-6-1: Scenario #1 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1. Source: Scenario #1 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.2%. Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advalorem/index.cfm; rounded to thousands 2. Taxable value for each year (Item 1) less the base year taxable value of $288,081,106; rounded to thousands 3. For each fund, the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage, divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections (i.e., the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018); rounded to thousands 5-6-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 1 5.6 WTaxable 2018 Value(i) $701,076,000 Tax Increrne �A $412,995,000 OffmWillage - �11 - Revenue(3) . 00 - - Total - 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,049,405,000 $761,324,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,104,810,000 $816,729,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,578,000 $584,000 $3,162,000 2027 $1,162,466,000 $874,385,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,766,000 $626,000 $3,392,000 2028 $1,221,578,000 $933,497,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,961,000 $670,000 $3,631,000 2029 $1,282,147,000 $994,066,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,161,000 $716,000 $3,877,000 2030 - 3.5645 0.8069 $3,366,000 $762,000 $4,128,000 Total $27,958,000 $6,329,000 $34,287,000 Table 5-5-2: Scenario #2 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: Source: Scenario #2 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.6016. Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. http.//edr.state.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advalorem/index.cfm; rounded to thousands Taxable value for each year (Item 1) less the base year taxable value cf $288,081,106; rounded to thousands For each fund, the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage, divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections (i.e., the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018); rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-6-4 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES L "ar 2018 Taxable Value(l) $701,076,000 Tax I ncr A..Jjen�� $412,995,000 ft Millage - -Ur - Revenue . 001 - (3) Fund Ill - Total - 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,075,710,000 $787,629,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,138,185,000 $850,104,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,667,000 $604,000 $3,271,000 2027 $1,202,734,000 $914,653,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,879,000 $652,000 $3,531,000 2028 $1,269,358,000 $981,277,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,097,000 $701,000 $3,798,000 2029 $1,338,058,000 $1,049,977,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,323,000 $752,000 $4,075,000 2030 - 3.5645 0.8069 $3,556,000 $805,000 $4,361,000 Total $28,648,000 $6,485,000 $35,133,000 Table 5-6-3: Scenario #3 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1. Source: Scenario #3 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 6.0%. Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. http://edr.stote.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advalorem/index.cfm; rounded to thousands 2. Taxable value for each year (Item 1) less the base year taxable value cf $288,081,106; rounded to thousands 3. For each fund, the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the milloge, divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections (i.e., the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018); rounded to thousands 5-6-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 1 5.6 Year (FY) 2018 MSTU Valuation $556,396,000 Budgeting AdjustmentTax - Millage - Projected - 2019 $591,115,000 95% 2.3604 $1,248,000 2020 $625,527,000 95% 2.3604 $1,326,000 2021 $660,035,000 95% 2.3604 $1,403,000 2022 $694,831,000 95% 2.3604 $1,480,000 2023 $730,024,000 95% 2.3604 $1,558,000 2024 $765,675,000 95% 2.3604 $1,637,000 2025 $801,820,000 95% 2.3604 $1,717,000 2026 $838,479,000 95% 2.3604 $1,798,000 2027 $875,663,000 95% 2.3604 $1,880,000 2028 $913,376,000 95% 2.3604 $1,964,000 2029 $951,615,000 95% 2.3604 $2,048,000 2030 $990,376,000 95% 2.3604 $2,134,000 2031 $1,029,652,000 95% 2.3604 $2,221,000 2032 $1,069,435,000 95% 2.3604 $2,309,000 2033 $1,109,713,000 95% 2.3604 $2,398,000 2034 $1,150,478,000 95% 2.3604 $2,488,000 2035 $1,191,719,000 95% 2.3604 $2,580,000 2036 $1,233,426,000 95% 2.3604 $2,672,000 2037 $1,275,588,000 95% 2.3604 $2,766,000 2038 $1,318,197,000 95% 2.3604 $2,860,000 2039 $1,361,244,000 95% 2.3604 $2,956,000 2040 $1,404,721,000 95% 2.3604 $3,052,000 2041 $1,448,622,000 95% 2.3604 $3,150,000 2042 $1,492,942,000 95% 2.3604 $3,248,000 2043 $1,537,676,000 95% 2.3604 $3,348,000 2044 $1,582,821,000 95% 2.3604 $3,448,000 2045 $1,628,376,000 95% 2.3604 $3,549,000 2046 $1,674,341,000 95% 2.3604 $3,651,000 2047 $1,720,719,000 95% 2.3604 $3,755,000 2048 1 -1 95%1 2.3604 $3,859,000 Total I -I FY 2018-49:1 $74,503,000 Table 5-6-4: Boyshore Beautification MSTU Scenario #1 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 5-6-6 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES Tax Year (FY) 2018 MSTU Valuation --Adjustment $564,586,000 Budgeting - Milla 9i%6__ - Projected RevenueA - 2019 $606,550,000 95% 2.3604 $1,266,000 2020 $647,829,000 95% 2.3604 $1,360,000 2021 $688,974,000 95% 2.3604 $1,453,000 2022 $730,243,000 95% 2.3604 $1,545,000 2023 $771,769,000 95% 2.3604 $1,637,000 2024 $813,623,000 95% 2.3604 $1,731,000 2025 $855,838,000 95% 2.3604 $1,824,000 2026 $898,424,000 95% 2.3604 $1,919,000 2027 $941,378,000 95% 2.3604 $2,015,000 2028 $984,686,000 95% 2.3604 $2,111,000 2029 $1,028,329,000 95% 2.3604 $2,208,000 2030 $1,072,280,000 95% 2.3604 $2,306,000 2031 $1,116,512,000 95% 2.3604 $2,404,000 2032 $1,160,995,000 95% 2.3604 $2,504,000 2033 $1,205,697,000 95% 2.3604 $2,603,000 2034 $1,250,586,000 95% 2.3604 $2,704,000 2035 $1,295,630,000 95% 2.3604 $2,804,000 2036 $1,340,798,000 95% 2.3604 $2,905,000 2037 $1,386,060,000 95% 2.3604 $3,007,000 2038 $1,431,3861000 95% 2.3604 $3,108,000 2039 $1,476,747,000 95% 2.3604 $3,210,000 2040 $1,522,118,000 95% 2.3604 $3,311,000 2041 $1,567,474,000 95% 2.3604 $3,413,000 2042 $1,612,792,000 95% 2.3604 $3,515,000 2043 $1,658,052,000 95% 2.3604 $3,616,000 2044 $1,703,235,000 95% 2.3604 $3,718,000 2045 $1,748,324,000 95% 2.3604 $3,819,000 2046 $1,793,307,000 95% 2.3604 $3,920,000 2047 $1,838,170,000 95% 2.3604 $4,021,000 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $4,122,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $80,079,000 Table 5-6-5: Boyshore Beautification MSTU Scenario #2 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands OMOO 00 5-6-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 1 5.6 Year (FY) 2018 MSTU Valuation $570,658,000 Budgeting AdjustmentTax - Millage - Projected - 2019 $618,846,000 95% 2.3604 $1,280,000 2020 $666,424,000 95% 2.3604 $1,388,000 2021 $714,0141000 95% 2.3604 $1,494,000 2022 $761,899,000 95% 2.3604 $1,601,000 2023 $810,218,000 95% 2.3604 $1,708,000 2024 $859,037,000 95% 2.3604 $1,817,000 2025 $908,378,000 95% 2.3604 $1,926,000 2026 $958,236,000 95% 2.3604 $2,037,000 2027 $1,008,590,000 95% 2.3604 $2,149,000 2028 $1,059,406,000 95% 2.3604 $2,262,000 2029 $1,110,643,000 95% 2.3604 $2,376,000 2030 $1,162,251,000 95% 2.3604 $2,490,000 2031 $1,214,180,000 95% 2.3604 $2,606,000 2032 $1,266,376,000 95% 2.3604 $2,723,000 2033 $1,318,783,000 95% 2.3604 $2,840,000 2034 $1,371,346,000 95% 2.3604 $2,957,000 2035 $1,424,009,000 95% 2.3604 $3,075,000 2036 $1,476,717,000 95% 2.3604 $3,193,000 2037 $1,529,417,000 95% 2.3604 $3,311,000 2038 $1,582,058,000 95% 2.3604 $3,430,000 2039 $1,634,591,000 95% 2.3604 $3,548,000 2040 $1,686,969,000 95% 2.3604 $3,665,000 2041 $1,739,148,000 95% 2.3604 $3,783,000 2042 $1,791,089,000 95% 2.3604 $3,900,000 2043 $1,842,753,000 95% 2.3604 $4,016,000 2044 $1,894,108,000 95% 2.3604 $4,132,000 2045 $1,945,121,000 95% 2.3604 $4,247,000 2046 $1,995,767,000 95% 2.3604 $4,362,000 2047 $2,046,022,000 95% 2.3604 $4,475,000 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $4,588,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $87,379,000 Table 5-6-6: Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario #3 Projected Revenues Notes: there is o 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 5-6-8 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 2019 $121,368,000 95% 1.0000 $108,000 2020 $128,527,000 95% 1.0000 $115,000 2021 $135,705,000 95% 1.0000 $122,000 2022 $142,943,000 95% 1.0000 $129,000 2023 $150,2631000 95% 1.0000 $136,000 2024 $157,677,000 95% 1.0000 $143,000 2025 $165,193,000 95% 1.0000 $150,000 2026 $172,815,000 95% 1.0000 $157,000 2027 $180,545,000 95% 1.0000 $164,000 2028 $188,384,000 95% 1.0000 $172,000 2029 $196,330,000 95% 1.0000 $179,000 2030 $204,383,000 95% 1.0000 $187,000 2031 $212,541,000 95% 1.0000 $194,000 2032 $220,801,000 95% 1.0000 $202,000 2033 $229,163,000 95% 1.0000 $210,000 2034 $237,623,000 95% 1.0000 $218,000 2035 $246,178,000 95% 1.0000 $226,000 2036 $254,828,000 95% 1.0000 $234,000 2037 $263,569,000 95% 1.0000 $242,000 2038 $272,399,000 95% 1.0000 $250,000 2039 $281,317,000 95% 1.0000 $259,000 2040 $290,320,000 95% 1.0000 $267,000 2041 $299,407,000 95% 1.0000 $276,000 2042 $308,577,000 95% 1.0000 $284,000 2043 $317,8291000 95% 1.0000 $293,000 2044 $327,161,000 95% 1.0000 $302,000 2045 $336,574,000 95% 1.0000 $311,000 2046 $346,067,000 95% 1.0000 $320,000 2047 $355,641,000 95% 1.0000 $329,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $338,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $6,517,000 OFP__ Table 5-6-7: Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario #1 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands 00 5-6-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 1 5.6 Year (FY) 2018 MSTU Valuatio $115,836,000 Budgeting AdjustmentTax - Millage - Projected - 2019 $124,558,000 95% 1.0000 $110,000 2020 $133,140,000 95% 1.0000 $118,000 2021 $141,695,000 95% 1.0000 $126,000 2022 $150,278,000 95% 1.0000 $135,000 2023 $158,915,000 95% 1.0000 $143,000 2024 $167,620,000 95% 1.0000 $151,000 2025 $176,401,000 95% 1.0000 $159,000 2026 $185,259,000 95% 1.0000 $168,000 2027 $194,193,000 95% 1.0000 $176,000 2028 $203,200,000 95% 1.0000 $184,000 2029 $212,276,000 95% 1.0000 $193,000 2030 $221,414,000 95% 1.0000 $202,000 2031 $230,610,000 95% 1.0000 $210,000 2032 $239,856,000 95% 1.0000 $219,000 2033 $249,146,000 95% 1.0000 $228,000 2034 $258,472,000 95% 1.0000 $237,000 2035 $267,828,000 95% 1.0000 $246,000 2036 $277,207,000 95% 1.0000 $254,000 2037 $286,603,000 95% 1.0000 $263,000 2038 $296,008,000 95% 1.0000 $272,000 2039 $305,418,000 95% 1.0000 $281,000 2040 $314,825,000 95% 1.0000 $290,000 2041 $324,226,000 95% 1.0000 $299,000 2042 $333,615,000 95% 1.0000 $308,000 2043 $342,987,000 95% 1.0000 $317,000 2044 $352,339,000 95% 1.0000 $326,000 2045 $361,667,000 95% 1.0000 $335,000 2046 $370,967,000 95% 1.0000 $344,000 2047 $380,238,000 95% 1.0000 $352,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $361,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $7,007,000 Table 5-6-8: Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario #2 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 5-6-10 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES Year (FY) 2018 MSTU Val $117,093,000 Budgeting AdjustmentTax - Millage - Projected - 2019 $127,106,000 95% 1.0000 $111,000 2020 $136,995,000 95% 1.0000 $121,000 2021 $146,888,000 95% 1.0000 $130,000 2022 $156,844,000 95% 1.0000 $140,000 2023 $166,892,000 95% 1.0000 $149,000 2024 $177,044,000 95% 1.0000 $159,000 2025 $187,305,000 95% 1.0000 $168,000 2026 $197,673,000 95% 1.0000 $178,000 2027 $208,144,000 95% 1.0000 $188,000 2028 $218,710,000 95% 1.0000 $198,000 2029 $229,362,000 95% 1.0000 $208,000 2030 $240,089,000 95% 1.0000 $218,000 2031 $250,880,000 95% 1.0000 $228,000 2032 $261,724,000 95% 1.0000 $238,000 2033 $272,609,000 95% 1.0000 $249,000 2034 $283,523,000 95% 1.0000 $259,000 2035 $294,454,000 95% 1.0000 $269,000 2036 $305,390,000 95% 1.0000 $280,000 2037 $316,321,000 95% 1.0000 $290,000 2038 $327,234,000 95% 1.0000 $301,000 2039 $338,119,000 95% 1.0000 $311,000 2040 $348,967,000 95% 1.0000 $321,000 2041 $359,769,000 95% 1.0000 $332,000 2042 $370,514,000 95% 1.0000 $342,000 2043 $381,197,000 95% 1.0000 $352,000 2044 $391,809,000 95% 1.0000 $362,000 2045 $402,344,000 95% 1.0000 $372,000 2046 $412,795,000 95% 1.0000 $382,000 2047 $423,159,000 95% 1.0000 $392,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $402,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $7,650,000 Table 5-6-9: Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario ##3 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands 5-6-11N Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions The following charts show underlying population and tax value trends that inform and contextualize the revenue projections calculations presented in this section. Figure 5-6-1 shows that the rate of population growth for Collier County has decreased sizably since 2002/2003, with a more gradual decrease projected out from 2017/2018 through 2030. In terms of historic tax value growth rates since 2000, Figure 5-6-2 shows that there was an increase during the lead up to the recession, followed by a drop during the recession itself. In recent years, the rate has gradually risen. Given the sizable changes during the lead -up to the recession and the recession itself, the model used to generate TIF projections was matched to longer historical trends in County taxable values, from the 1970s through 2003/2004 historical taxable value for Collier County. Figure 5-6-3 shows the historical trend used for guidance in blue; this trend is continued for comparison to projection calculations (in this case, for the low revenue projections, shown by the grey line through 2030). The orange line indicates historic data that was excluded from the historic trend basis since it was considered an anomaly. 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% Annual Population Growth Rate (2000-2030) O O O O O O O O O O N c-I eN-I rm-I ��-I rN-I H LO H N --I N N N N N N N N N N M O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Figure 5-6-1: Population Growth Rate Trends and Projections (2000-2030) Source: BEER, Volume 51, Bulletin 180, January 2018 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 /5-6-�12 5.6 1 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% / 4 % 20.0% % %■ 10.01A ■■ ■ 0.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2067 -10.0% -20.0% -30.0% _W+_ op 100 LZOD9 2010 2 A02 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 do j -County TaxVal % CRATax Val % Figure 5-6-2: Trends in Tax Value Growth Rates (2000-2017) Source: Florida Property Valuations and Tax Databook & EDR Ad Valorem Revenue Estimating Conference $180,000,000,000 $160,000,000,000 $140,000,000,000 $120,000,000,000 $100,000,000,000 $80, 000,000, 000 $60,000,000,000 $40, 000,000, 000 $20, 000,000, 000 $0 1976197819801982198419861988199019921994199619982000200220042006200820102012201420162018202020222024202620282030 Figure 5-6-3: Historic and Projected TIF Revenue Trend Comparison for Low Revenue Projection Source: Florida Property Valuations and Tax Databook & EDR Ad Valorem Revenue Estimating Conference 5-6-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 1 5.6 Conclusion With the recovery from the recession of 2008, the CRA area is poised for revitalization via investment, development, and redevelopment. With this update, the CRA will be able to continue the general mission of redevelopment that it set out when the Bayshore Gateway Triangle redevelopment area was first created in 2000. The CRA can move forward with the more detailed planning and evaluation for the suggested implementation items of this Redevelopment Area Plan with the guidance of the overall vision, allowing for change and also protecting and enhancing what defines the area and makes it unique. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —May 2019 5-6-14 1.0 Tindale :.Oliver design Section 6 Relocation Procedures Relocation of residents and businesses displaced, as a result of property acquisition by the CRA will follow procedures, which fulfill the intent of the law and objectives stated below. Collier County uses the Florida Department of Transportation relocation policy as a guideline which is based on the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Assistance Act of 1970 of the U.S. Federal Government. In those cases in which.acquisition and relocation are to be utilized, the following general policy and guidelines shall apply unless the CRA chooses to adopt a separate relocation policy from time to time for " a specific project. Displacement Policy and Guidelines: 'Displacement" means the involuntary movement; except temporary relocation, of a household from a dwelling unit resulting from its acquisition, rehabilitation, or demolition, or a code enforcement activity. Relocation benefits will be received, on a uniform basis, by displaced families or persons following the guidelines of this policy. Activities which result in displacement action or in which ,displacement may occur shall take into account options and effects to minimize displacement whenever possible. . Policy Applicabilitv This policy and guidelines shall be used for redevelopment activities as a Local Displacement Policy, only when comprehensive treatment (an area which is effected by social, economical, and capital improvements as well as rehabilitation) in a target area is used. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Designated Target Areas: Relocation benefits are available to eligible households residing in dwelling units located in redevelopment target areas only when comprehensive treatment is used. Occupancy Requirements Owner/Occupant: A person will be considered an owner/occupant if he/she actually owned and occupied the dwelling unit for not less than 180 consecutive days immediately prior to the Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit.. Tenant: A person will be considered a tenant if he/she lawfully occupied the rental dwelling for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit. Purchaser/Occupant: A person will be considered a purchaser -occupant if he/she occupied the dwelling unit for not less than 180 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit under a bona fide, written Agreement for Deed, Business: The occupants, for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection, of the dwelling in which the business is located. Written Notice Determination of Displacement A person or business will be considered displaced as a result of redevelopment activities only if the displacement move occurs as a result of and after receipt of a written notice of eligibility for displacement benefits. Adequate time will be provided to the displace to locate suitable .temporary or permanent housing. Relation of Displacement Payments to Income and Assets Displacement payments are not to be considered as income or for determining eligibility of a person or business under housing assistance programs. Displacement payments are not to be considered as assets for determining eligibility for H.U.D. or other public housing programs. Condition of the Replacement Dwelling as a Criterion for Payment When the replacement dwelling selected by the displace does not meet the local minimum housing code', the Community Redevelopment Agency has a responsibility for providing continuing assistance to facilitate the claimant's move to a replacement dwelling that meets the local minimum housing code. BENEFITS AND ASSISTANCE Displacement Policy: Minimizing Impacts Relocation payments and assistance will be made on a uniform basis to all those eligible without regard to race, color, religion, handicap, sex, age or source of income. Persons or businesses eligible for benefits and assistance are cautioned not to make any move before receiving approval from Collier County. This provision must be strictly adhered to inasmuch as unapproved moves. could result in denial of benefits and assistance. Benefits to be provided will be made as established in this relocation plan and all payments made under this policy shall be deemed appropriate by Collier County. Project or program activities shall be planned and carried out in a manner that minimizes hardship to site occupants. Persons or businesses to be displaced shall be afforded the opportunity of participating in the formulation of relocation plans and shall be provided full information relating to program or project activities which may have an impact on the residents and businesses of the project or program area. Arrangements shall be made to provide relocation assistance in accordance with the needs of those to be displaced, including social services counseling, guidance assistance, and referrals, as well as housing counseling. Relocation shall be carried out in a manner that will promote maximum choice within the community's total housing supply; lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. Services to Minimize Displacement Impacts: Services shall be provided to all persons and businesses being displaced to assure that the relocation process will not result in different or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, sex, age, or source of income. Eligible persons and businesses shall be fully informed at the earliest possible date as to the availability of relocation payments and assistance, and the eligibility requirements, as well as the procedures for obtaining such payments and assistance.. Direct personal interviews will be utilized to determine the extent of the need of each eligible person and business for relocation assistance. Displacement Housing Benefits: Redevelopment Condemnation/Demolition and Rehabilitation A family person or business displaced under this Section is eligible for a displacement benefit for a comparable replacement dwelling as determined by family composition or business. Owner/occupants.,who elect to purchase a replacement dwelling are eligible for a maxim m payment of $15,000.00, 103 Tenants are eligible for a displacement housing payment of up to $4,000.00 rental assistance, or down payment assistance. Owner/occupants who do not elect to purchase another housing unit are eligible for a replacement housing payment equivalent to four years rental assistance, but not to exceed $4,000.00. Computation of rental assistance payments shall be based on the current Fair Market Rents. Moving Expense and Dislocation Allowance Families and persons permanently vacating their dwelling because of Condemnation/Demolition or Rehabilitation activities are eligible for a one time moving expense allowance of up to $500.00 to help defray costs involved in displacement. Businesses: The occupant of the dwelling is eligible for a moving payment of up to $10,000.00 to relocate the business to a decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling. Finality of Payment The total approved amount of a relocation payment is not subject to later computation except to correct an error or to implement findings on review in accordance with established procedures. Temporary Displacement Benefits Temporary Displacement Benefits, when authorized, shall be fully documented and approved by the Administrator of Community Development and Environmental Services. Temporary benefits shall discontinue upon issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Approved costs in connection with a temporary displacement include: Actual reasonable moving cost to and from temporary accommodations which must be located within Collier County. These costs can be one of the following: a) Actual invoice cost of a certified moving contractor. b) A $300.00 total allowance if a se move. c)' A $100,00 total allowance if displacement does not involve household furnishings. 2. Actual reasonable cost. of renting or sharing a temporary dwelling excluding deposits and installation charges. Temporary housing accommodations can be one of the following depending upon the composition of the displaced household and available accommodations: a) A dwelling reserved. exclusively for temporary relocation housing. b) Other adequate housing. c) A motel, only when displacement is less than 15 days. 3. Actual reasonable costs for storage of furniture that cannot be housed in the temporary unit, not to exceed the benefit period for temporary housing. 4. Businesses are not eligible for temporary displacement benefits. In all cases, the temporary displacement dwelling must be inspected and approved by the Community Redevelopment Agency as decent, safe, and sanitary. DOCUMENTATION, ASSURANCES, AND SERVICES 104 Displacement Plan Implementation J The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency isthe assigned administrative implementing agency for displacement and shall use the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Handbook 1371.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition, for assistance and guidance in implementing this policy. Equal Opporturiity In carrying out displacement actions, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency shall take affirmative actions to provide displaced families, individuals and businesses maximum opportunities in selecting replacement dwellings within the community's total housing supply. Affirmative Action shall take place to lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. Notification of Availability of Payments As soon as it is ascertained that a family or business displacement is imminent, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall provide them with written notification of the specific types of relocation payments for which the displace is apparently eligible and the estimation of the benefits that may. be received. Housing'Referrals Current and continuing information will be provided on the availability, prices of comparable sales and rental dwellings. Assurances will be provided that, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, there will be available comparable decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings meeting the Collier County Minimum Housing Standards, equal in number and available to eligible persons and businesses who will be displaced. Supportive Services Necessary advisory services will be provided to eligible persons and businesses, such as counseling and referrals with regard to housing, financing, employment, training, health, welfare and other assistance in order to minimize any hardships incurred. Each eligible person shall be assisted in completing any required applications and forms. RELOCATION PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS Case File Records: Case file records shall be maintained for each displaced person/ family or business. Record keeping standards shall follow the HUD Relocation Handbook as guidance. Management Control System: A Management Control System shall be established to identify the size and composition of the displacement/relocation workload. Management Control Standards shall follow the HUD Relocation Handbook as guidance. Opinions of the County Attorney Opinions of the County Attorney concerning legality of actions or procedures shall .be sought and incorporated as required. Notices and Correspondence Notices to affected parties and decisions shall be in writing or a part of a written case file record. Written records shall be kept in accordance with Collier County policy. Procedural Guidance and Standards HUD Handbook 1376.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition shall be used as guidance for procedures and standards for displacement activities. APPEALS PROCEDURE A formal appeal procedure has been established and maintained for use by displaced persons and businesses seeking administrative review of agency determinations in connection with displacement payments and/or adequacy of replacement housing. Appeals of this Displacement Policy must be presented in writing. The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel consisting of the Administrator of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and one resident property owner of affected area appointed by the County Manger is assigned the administration of appeals of the Local Displacement Policy. Timing for Initiating Appeal An appeal concerning eligibility for, or the amount of, a displacement benefit shall be filed within six months after the Community Redevelopment Agency's notification to the person of its determination of a displacement case. An. appeal alleging failure to provide appropriate housing referrals or to properly inspect the replacement dwelling shall be filed not later than six months after the person's displacement. Appeal The appeal may include any related statement of fact or other material. Assistance to Person Making Appeal If a person or business is unable to prepare a written appeal, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall offer them appropriate assistance and notify them of other available sources of assistance. Scope of Review of Written Appeal: The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall consider a person's or business' written appeal, regardless of form. In deciding the appeal, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall consider: 1) All applicable rules and regulations; 2) All pertinent justification and written material submitted by the person making the appeal; and 3) All material upon which the Community Redevelopment Agency based the determinations) being appealed and any other available information that is needed to insure a fair and full review of the appeal. However, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel must ensure that the person making the appeal has had reasonable opportunity to review any such materials and information on which an adverse ruling on the appeal may be based. Request for Additional Time If a person or business makes a request for additional time to gather and prepare information for a written appeal, the person or business must be granted 30 days additional time, in addition to the time limits established by this policy. This request must be documented by the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel. Determination and Notification after Written Appeal Within 30 days after receipt of information submitted by a person or business in support of their appeal, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall make written determination on the appeal and furnish the person with a copy. The written determination shall include, but need not be limited to: 1) The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel's decision upon review of the appeal; 2) The factual and legal basis upon which the decision is based, including any pertinent explanation; 3) If any payment or other relief to the person or business is granted, a brief statement on how this will be provided; 4) If the relief requested is not granted, a statement of the person or business right to appeal to the County Commission within 30 days. 107 A t2 c 1 RESOLUTION N0. 2000- 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REIATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS; FINDING BLIGHTED AREAS EXIST IN THE COUNTY; FINDING 7HE REHABILITATION, CONSERVATION OR REDEVELOPMENT OF SUCH AREAS IS NECESSARY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST; FINDING A SPECIFIED AREA TO BE A BLIGHTED AREA AND A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Comm(ssioners has received and considered a report and presentaiion by County staff and consultant which identlged conditions within the boundades of Coilfer County in the areas Identified, descdbed and depicied on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution (the "Area"); and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions In the Area and has rece(ved and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Area as have been presented to it, the Board of County Commissioners desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can ba accomplished in the Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Area; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findlnas. The Board of County Commissioners does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board of County Commissioners, fhe following conditions exist in the Area: Conditions are present In the Area that are detrimental to the sound growth of the county and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the Area, and present conditions and uses in the Area are detrimental to the public health, safely, morals and public welfare; and and 2. There is a predominance of inadequate or defective street layout; 3. There Is faulty and Inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacyI accessibility, or usefulness; and 4. There are unsanitary conditions as such relates to the conditions of the sanitary system and there are unpaved and dateriomting roadways resulting in unsafe public conditions; and and 5. There has been a deterioration of silo and other improvements; 6. There Is a diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title, which prevent the free alienability of land. (b) The notices required by Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1999), have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statute. (c) Action must be taken Immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made in the Area. Section 2. Flndi of Necessity, The Board of County Commissioners, based upon evidence presented to II and in the public record, does hereby find that one or more "blighted areas" (as defined in Section 163.340(8), Florida Statutes), exist within Collier County, Florida, and, further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas described is necessary in the interest of the public health, safely, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida. presented to it and contained in the public record, the Board of County Commissioners does hereby find the Area (as herelnbafore dented) is a "blighted area" (as that term is defined In Section 163.340(8), Florida Statutes (1999), and that such area constitutes a 12 C "community redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163.34000), Florida Statutes (1999)I Section 4, Conflictc. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein is Intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 5. Severabflity. If any section or portion of a section of this resolutionI including any part of the exhibit, proves to be Invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, It shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force, or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should either area constituting part of the Area or part thereof shall be severed from the Area and the remainder shall constitute the Area for purposes of this resolultion. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall become eHective immediately upon Its passage and adoption. Section 7. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this LY day Iu r .. rrr ATTEST: .. DW�GHT t"a. BROCK, CLERK Attest' a4 to tha man's s t citl y. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER ORIDA BY: i.Q" APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGA David C. Weigel County Attorney l EXHIBIT A BAYSHORE(GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630, E 662, S 427'0 E 200'0 N 270', E TO THE E RM LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 921, E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B. ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670% S 7731 1 W 200% S 735% W 2001, S 9909, E 460', S 3301, E 9721, S 11741, SWLY 4811, NWLY 523% W 95% SWLY 730' TO THE NELY R/W LINE U.S. 41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY R/W LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W RAN LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761 % N 1355% W TO THE W R/W LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB, W 100', N TO THE N R/W OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY R/W LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W R/W LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB, F_1�1�7 BEG SE CNR SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO E'/. CNR SECT14, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR LOT 6, CREWS SUB, N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, E TO THE SWLY RIW LINE OF U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N RIW LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 7611, N 1355% W TO THE W R/W LINE OF PINE STREET, S TO THE S R/W LINE OF MANGROVE STREET, W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F. HALDEMAN RIVER SUB, S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. 12 C1 BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TWP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27, AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW '% OF SW % SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW % OF SW '/. SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W'/2 OF NW % SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W %3 OF NW % SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W % CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S'% CNR SEC 1 AND THE N % CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S % CNR SEC 12 AND THE N'/. CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W % CNR SEC 13 AND THE E % CNR OF SEC 14, TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W'/, CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E'% CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE E Y. CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 251 TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. A ON7 m T e7 s I T 46 5 i T 47 5 � T46 5 2 C 1 S a N1iC'd.� ;tom - %L '_ k IV MAPS .1fr4rollfrommilm INTRODUCTION STATUTORY DEFINITION BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS IMMOKALEE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area OImmokalee Redevelopment Area Page 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 8 Page 7 Page 13 I. INTRODUCTION The first step in creating a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) is a "Finding of Necessity" or a finding that one or more geographic areas in a municipality has conditions of "slum or blight", and that there is a need to rehabilitate, conserve and redevelop that area. Accomplished by Resolution of the governing body, this finding means that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof is necessary. On January 11, 2000 the Board of County Commissions directed staff to prepare a Finding of Necessity for two areas with in Collier County: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and Immokalee. This report details the Findings of Necessity" for the above referenced areas. II. STATUTORY DEFINITION OF SLUM AND BLIGHT IN CHAPTER 163.340 Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute defines slum and blight as the following: "Slum Area" means an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence; inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces; high density of population and overcrowding; the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes; or any combination of such factors is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, or crime and Is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The following sections detail the findings of blighted conditions in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and the Immokalee areas that justify making a finding of Necessity for blighted conditions as outlined in Chapter 163, Florida Statute: IIt. BAYSHORElGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA N I 9&WWLWWW1M OJEMWINWAMWA 0 0• (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or Inadequate street layout. These problems include: Inadequate street layout and design; Commercial parking problems; Lack of streetlights along major arterial and most local streets; Lack of sidewalks; and Lack of neighborhood connections. In the Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment area there are three major collectors, Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive and Shadowlawn Drive. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum of 100 feet of right of way for collectors. Shadowlawn Drive bisects a residential community with an elementary school and several churches. It is located in the Gateway Triangle area and is a two- lane collector with 11 foot wide lanes. The right-of-way width of Shadowlawn Drive varies from 55 to 70 feet. Shadowlawn Drive does not have sidewalks or bike lanes and does not meet the 100' minimum right-of-way standard. Thomasson Drive is a two-lane facility. The roadway width is twenty feet which does not meet the County's standard of a twenty-two foot minimum width for collector roads. There are no sidewalks along Bayshore Road from Thomasson Road south to its terminous. The commercial areas are located on Davis Boulevard (5R 84), Airport Road, Bayshore Road and US 41. Davis Boulevard, Airport Road and US 41 are the area's major arterials. All are characterized by inadequate off-street parking and no available on -street parking. Along these early -established commercial corridors many businesses were constructed prior to the establishment of development standards for parking. The parking problem has worsened along Davis Boulevard and US 41 due to roadway widening from four to six lane facilities. On -street parking is no longer available on Davis Boulevard and some of the parking area along US 41 was acquired for the recent road widening of that facility. In some cases, parking lots are oriented in such a way that vehicles must back out into traffic. Most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another so there are no shared parking opportunities. Davis Boulevard has no streetlights creating a compromised nighttime travel condition. There is very little nighttime pedestrian activity and some businesses have taken measures to secure their properties with bars on windows and chain link fences along the perimeter of their properties. The residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another. The typical local street width is 18 feet in the area. The County standard for local roads is 20 feet. There is no street lighting or sidewalks on most local streets. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: The majority of land zoned for commercial development within this area is zoned General Commercial (C-4) and Heavy Commercial (C-5). Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet with a minimum width of 100 feet. Most of the commercial lots in the area do not meet the minimum size of width required for commercial development. The lots accessed off of US41and Davis Boulevard have been reduced in size as a result of road widening projects of these two arterials. The C-4 and C-5 zoning district requires a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet, a side yard setback of 15 feet; and a 15 feet rear yard set back. The majority of buildings are located on or near the lot line, with no buffer. In addition, the entire commercial Tots located between Pine Street and US41 were platted years ago when minimum standards were not applied and do not conform to most of today's standards. The majority of the land zoned for residential development in the Gateway Triangle area is zoned Residential Multiple Family — 6 district (RMF-6). The area consists of 359 acres of which 125 acres are zoned residential. There are A02 residential dwelling units within this area. The actual residential density is far below the approved density for the area, with 1 unit per 3 aces developed instead of the 6 units per acre allowed. The average age of the housing stock is 45- 55 years old. The RMF-6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet far atwo-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. Most of the residential properties in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. Some do not meet either of the width or lot square footage requirements. Some of the buildings are non -conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, and setbacks. In the Bayshore neighborhood there is a mixture of residential zoning. The majority is RMF-6 and Residential Single Family-4 district (RSF-4). There are also Mobile Home (MH) and Village Residential district (VR) zoning within the area. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet with a width of 70 feet for interior lots and 75 feet for corner lots for residential development in the RSF4 zoning district. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. la(C) �� Most of the residential lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. On average the lots in these areas are forty to fifty feet wide. Most of the buildings are non -conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, and setbacks. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 0.10 percent of BayshorelGateway Triangle area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.02 percent. In occupied housing units across the county for 1990, only 0.03 percent of the units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure for the Bayshore/Gateway area is 3.0 percent, reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the area (1990 Census). In the Bayshore/Gateway study area, 2 unsafe structures identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks and streetlights are almost absent from local streets within the redevelopment area 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Most of the local roads are poorly drained. Properties and roads are frequently flooded. O Surface water management problems are present within the entire Bayshore/Gateway study area. These problems include localized flooding and direct discharge of stormwater run-off into Naples Bay. Significant and frequent flooding throughout the Gateway area is attributed to low elevations and inadequate stormwater management systems. Bayshore experiences the same problems. The entire Bayshore area, east of Bayshore Road ,south of Haldemann Creek experiences the same significant and frequent flooding. South of Thomasson Drive, many of the local roads are unpaved and are poorly drained. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. The current right of way along Shadowlawn Drive is inadequate to provide needed improvements and acquisition of additional right of way would negatively impact the community. /�.��J /6 The commercial Tots lack adequate parking facilities. There is no public transportation provided within the study area The local streets do not meet the County standards of right —of- way width, pavement width, or placement of sidewalks. u � �sina Affordabili� tas defined in Section 163 355 (S��S ]means• An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. There is a great demand (n the County for affordable housing. According to the Florida Association of Realtors, the Naples MSA is the least affordable community in the State. In 1996, the median sales price for a single family home in the MSA was $180,000. In addition, only 31% of all dwelling units sold in 1995 were under $99,000. While there are opportunities for obtaining affordable housing in the Bayshore/Gateway Traingie Redevelopment Area, the average 1999 sales price for a single family home was $108,267. The current trends predici that acquisition and rental prices will continue to rise. According to Kiplinger's Personal Finance it is projected that within the next ten years home values in Naples are expected to grow by 75.1 percent. CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Bayshore/Gateway study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. i7 BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630', E 6621 S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E R/W LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670% S 773', W 200% S 7351, W 200% S 99001 E 460% S 3301, E 972', S 1174', SWLY 481 % NWLY 5231, W 950 , SWLY 730' TO THE NELY R/W LINE U.S. 41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY R/W LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAW LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W RfW LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 7611, N 1355, W TO THE W R/W LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB, W 100', N TO THE N R/W OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY R/W LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W R/W LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. • Igo• •_ . • g► • •_ • BAYSHLaRE /GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOMENT AREA --- .. - - ---=-,� _�1 l _� 1_. �I � �, ��� _ y"• _ "`. !t _. '__. `--fir. i"_T= -- � �:. � `� ,� � _. -` --9 2v-- '- _ - t - _ - r � _ - �.� _ I �^ i '� _� r ' � � / WND VSf /iCINO � a."' - GI ........._. .. _� __ V. IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Immokalee Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or inadequate street layout. Most Immokalee residents walk or bicycle to work, school and shopping. Few adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are available throughout the Immokalee study area. Problems include: Inadequate street layout and design Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide drainage swales . Poor access to Commercial and Industrial parking and access problems Few sidewalks available for a predominately pedestrian population A general lack of neighborhood connections to each other The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four -lane segment is called Main Street and is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on -street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. New Market Road is a two lane facility with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks, paved shoulders, or turn lanes. The remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks are encouraged to use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. Immokalee Road intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main Street. North of Main Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only. Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical local street widths are less than twenty feet required in the Collier County Land Development Code and open stormwater systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails. For example, south of State Road 29, along 9'" Street, there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the roadway. There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there is not enough right of (C) way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system. In addition, many residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another and most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another. The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park lacks adequate water and sewer service and stormwater management facilities to sufficiently handle the projected future development. County Road 846 that leads to Airpark Blvd. is a two-lane facility with narrow lanes and no paved shoulders. This facility does not adequately address the projected increase in truck traffic due to the future development of the airport and industrial park. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: The majority of commercial lots are zoned General Commercial District (C-4) or Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In the C-4 and C-5 zoning district a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, with a width of 100 feet for commercial development is required. Many of the commercial lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for commercial development. Some do not meet either of the lot width or lot square footage requirements. Existing buildings are frequently non -conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers. The RMF6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for atwo-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. The majority of lots are non -conforming and rebuilding on these lots may require the owner to seek a variance from the development standards. In the South Immokalee area over 50% of the platted lots are non -conforming. The majority of these lots are zoned C-4 or RMF-6. A majority of the mobile home parks in the Immokalee community were developed in the 1970's and do not meet the minimum standards and permitted densities. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. It is common in the Immokalee Community to have intensive commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses without adequate buffering between the uses. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 1.2 percent of Immokalee' area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.2 percent. In occupied housing' units in Immokalee according to the 1990 U.S. Census, 6.8 percent of the owner occupied units and 16 percent of the renter occupied units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure is .03 for the entire County reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the Immokalee area. Based on the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study, there were a total of 4,957 housing units of those 1,282 or 26% are in need of rehabilitation. o�� In the Immokalee study area, 19 unsafe buildings and 4 unsecure structures were identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks are almost entirely absent from the redevelopment area. There is a lack of street lighting in the most of the residential neighborhoods. Wide and deep open swales are present in the South Immokalee neighborhoods. They accumulate stagnate water and trash. The disposal of garbage in the Immokalee area is a problem. Lack of adequate dumpsters for the mobile home parks and commercial establishments results in a serious litter problem. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District covers approximately 27 square miles and most of the Urban area of Immokalee. However, the geographic area served by the district is considerably smaller. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The sprayfields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. An /"'� example is the Baker Street area which is on a separate collection system. There have been f� JI three reported failures since 1997 where raw sewage was deposited on the ground. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. r In a primarily pedestrian community, there is a lack of an integrated sidewalk system connecting residential areas with commercial establishments. There is no public transportation system. The commercial lots along Main Sireet and First Street lack adequate parking facilities. New Market Road does not adequately address the needs of the semi -trucks and trailers that transport the farm products out of the area. Heavy truck traffic on local streets intrudes residential neighborhoods and has had a negative Impact on commercial redevelopment activities. SR 29 does not provide the number of lanes needed to adequately serve the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Housing Affordabilityjas defined in Section 163 3�5 {8) F S j means• An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. A housing unit is considered affordable if the monthly payments do not exceed 35 percent of the monthly income for principal, interests, taxes, and insurance. According to the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study 36 percent of the households with a mortgage and 40 percent of renter occupied households pay more than 35 percent of their income for housing. According to the study of those persons making less than $10,000, 72 percent pay more than 35 percent of their income to rent. The median household income in 1990 according to the U.S. Census Bureau was $15,170. Forty- five percent of the population in Immokalee is below the poverty level. The population growth, as well as high seasonal farm labor population, has produced a critical demand for housing according to the 1999 Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Strategic Plan. There is a shortage of low and moderate income housing in the Immokalee Community CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Immokalee study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Immokalee study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. /�Cc1( BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TWP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27, AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW'/<OF SW Y< SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW '/4 OF SW % SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W '/2 OF NW'/. OF SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W '/2 OF NW '/. SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W'/< CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S Y< CNR SEC 1 AND THE N '/< CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S Y. CNR SEC 12 AND THE N'/ CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W Y< CNR SEC 13 AND THE E Y< CNR OF SEC 14, TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W'/< CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E'/. CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, OAND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE E Y CNR OF SEC 11 THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. W Q F- Z W a O W W W W W !J� Y 5901 5 L41 W...._..._ .._ ._ _... ..__�_._... __. __. .._-__z. .._ __..._ _._ _._._.._. _ W � m p � a � /.. i ;� � — i i i � /` i I s �� �� _ ,�� - I II �, jr �: , `�_ _ , , %v. g r _ �,,,, � - � _ z �. ,6� _ �c �— ;> ��� Is - €�� m ���.- _ z� ��� = - - W W I m S � �3 m N - � S N _ _ 5 j 5 9V 1 S Gt+ 1 13 as 12 C 1 RRSOLUTION NO. 2000-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; DECLARING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO BE THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF ADVISORY BOARDS FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted a resolution finding the existence of one or more blighted areas In the unincoryoreted Brea of the County antl further }inding that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof, in such areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, to carry out and Implement the redevelopment powers and actions contemplated by Part III, Chapter 183, Flodda Statutes, within such areas, it is necessary that a community redevelopment agency be created; end WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to serve as the community redevelopment agency and have advisory boards consisting of citizens and property owners in the areas providing advice to the Board concerning the redevelopment of the areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. i din s. The foregoing recitals are hereby adopted and Incorporated herein to the same extent as if they were set forth in this section. Section 2. Declaration of Board of County Commissioners as Community j3edeveloomentAgency. As provided in Section 163.357(1), Florida Statutes (1998), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, does hereby declare itself to be the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency as an additional duty of office, and does further declare that all the rights, powers, duties, privileges, and immunities vested by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (1999) in such a community redevelopment agency are hereby vested In the Board of County Commissioners, subject to all responsibilities and liabilities imposed or incurred. Section 2. Separate Least Entity. The members of the Board of County Commissioners are the members of the Community Redevelopment Agency, but the members constitute the head of a legal entity, separate, distinct, and Independent from the Board of County Commissioners. Section 3. Creation of Advlsory Boards. There are to be created, under separate resolutions by the Community Redevelopment Agency, advisory boards for each component 12 C '1 area of the community redevelopment area in the unincorporated area of Collier County, which shall be composed of citizens, residents, property owners and business owners or persons engaged in business In the area, as provided in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency providing for the appointment of such members. The duties and responsibilities of such advisory boards shall be set forth in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency, Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed. Section 5. Severability. It any section or portion of a section of this resolution proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or Impair the val(dily, force, or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Section 6. ENective Data.This resolution shall become eNective immediately upon Its passage end adoption. Section 7. This Resolution adopted after motion, second end maJority vote this f y� day of 1C 2000, ATTEST: BOARD OF C STONERS DWIGFiT�. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER UNTY, FLORIDA DC . BY: Osr TIMOTW.XCONSTAIrNE, C IRMAN 71ttast.at to Chairman's sfynat evonlse APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C. Weigel County Attorney E 12C 1 Resolution No. 2000.181 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA* RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAILING FINDINGS; ADOPTING A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the County Commission adopted Resdution 2000-02 on March 14, 2000, finding the existence of blight conditions in two areas In the unincorporated area of Collier County , as more particularly described in that resolution (such area being referred to herein as the "Community Redevelopment Area'); and WHEREAS, a Community Redevelopment Plan as contemplated by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (1999), has been prepared which addresses the redevelopment needs in the Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2000, the County's Planning Commission, a: the County's Lcoal Planning Agency for purposes of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, determined the proposed community redevelopment plan is In conformity with the County's comprehensive plan for the County as a whole and recommended the County Commission approve the proposed plan; and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency on May 23, 2000 approved the proposed community redevelopment plan and recommended It to the County Commission; and WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed community redevelopment plan was submitted by the Community Redevelopment Agency to the County Commission, as the governing body of Collier County, Florida, and to Big Corkscrew Fire District; East Naples Fire District; Immokalse Fire District; Collier County Board of County Commissioners; and the Collier County Mosquito Control District, as taxing authorities which levy ad valorem taxes on taxable real property contained within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, the notices required by Section 183.348, Florida Statutes (1999), have been published and mailed as required therein, antl a public hearing regarding the proposed community redevelopment plan was held. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: �. 2 C l SECTION t. Incomoratlnc Recitals, The Board of County Commissioners finds, declares and determines that the matters set forth In the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein es a part of this Resoludon. SECTION 2. Findina of Conformance with Comprehensive Plan. The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the proposed community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area attached hereto as Exhibit W (the "Community Redevelopment Plan') conforms to the general comprehensive plan of Collier County as a whole. SECTION J. Findina of Adepuacv of Recreational Facilities. The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the Community Redevelopment Plan gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities that are desirable for neighborhood Improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety, and vreffare of chiltlren residing in the general vidnity of the are covered by the plan. SECTION 4. Findina of Relocation. The County Commission finds that a feasible method for the relocation of families who will be displaced from the community redevelopment area In decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without undue hardship to such families Is contained in the Community Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 6. Finding of Maximum Opportunity. The County Commission hereby finds that although the Community Redevelopment Plan contemplates most Improvements will be undertaken by the County or the CRA, the Community Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the County as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private enterprise to the extent contemplated by said plan. SECTION 8. Adoption of Communily Redevelopment Plan. The County Commission does hereby adopt tha Community Redevelopment Pian as the community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area and authorizes and directs the Community Redevelopment Agency to proceed with the implementation of the plan. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval by the County Commission, 2 1Re 1 SECTION U. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this IOS_ day ot:TkAe—� 2DWF ATTRST: DWIGHT C. BROOK, CLERK Itteat as t0 Chs,frssa's sipitun' Are BOARD OF TYCOMMISSIONERS LLIER OUNTY jeo CO, FLORIDA r TIMOTHYiJ. CONSTAT)yfINE, CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C. Weigel County Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - 1 79 1 � F A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA TO EXIST AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000-82, finding a specified area of Immokalee to be blighted and creating the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2004, the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended expansion of the boundaries of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area (Area), as set forth in Exhibit A (Expanded Area); and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2004, the Board received and considered a report and presentation by County staff identifying current economic conditions and considered the applicability of various economic incentives within this Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions in the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expanded Area presented to it, the Board now desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part III, Chapter 183, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished In the Expanded Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Expanded Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners, consistent with § 163.355, Fla. Stet. (2003), does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board that the following conditions exist in the Expanded Area proposed to be added to the existing Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area: 1. Past conditions continue to be present in the Expanded Area that are Page 1 of 3 ?F detrimental to the sound growth of the County and which substantially impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area, and present conditions and uses in the Expanded Area are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and public welfare; and 2. There is a faulty and inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness in the Expanded Area; and 3. The aggregate assessed values of real properly In the Expanded Area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the past five years; and 4. There are inadequate and outdated building density patterns in the Expanded Area; and 6. There are unsanitary and unsafe conditions in the Expanded Area; and 8. There has been a deterioration of site and other improvements in the Expanded Area. (b) The notices required by Section 163.346 and Section 163.361 (3), Florida Statutes (2003), have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statutes. (c) Action must be to+ken immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made in the Expanded Area, 4 Section 2. Finding of Necessity. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon the evidence presented to It and in the public record with respect to the conditions found In Section 1 (a), above, finds that a "blighted area" as defined in Section 163.340 (8), Florida Statutes, exists within the boundaries of Collier County in the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution (the Expanded Area), and further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida. Section 3. Community Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented and contained in the public record, the Board of County Commissioners finds the Expanded Area constitutes a 'community redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163,340 (10), Florida Statutes (2003), and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions In conflict with any Page 2 of 3 of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein is intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act, specifically including Resolution 2003-82, Section 8. Severabilit . If any section or portion of a section of this Resolution, Including any part of Exhibit A, proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force, or effect of any other section or part oI this resolution. Should any area constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall constitute part of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon adoption. This Resolution adopted attar motion, second and maJority vote this _day of 2004* fry a^� ; , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS T E: BKuM CI r OF COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA No.Lh�� BY: _ DONNA FIALA, Chairman A�eCato form a� sufficiency: Patric AsslstantCounty Attorney if /7F Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A (Sheet I of 2) 1 IF F�cistfng &Proposed Community Redevelopment Area R 20E I R29E R30E it CUM"Cwnty O m wi YP ..P,�wk., ExhlbltA \' �tw Oo^^W+MPWrwpmPNr l� o n 1. i. 1, .. 31 1�� EXHIBIT A (Sheet 2 of 2) Description of the Exoanded Areas of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area (Area) In addition to the area described in Exhibit A of Resolution 2000-82, the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to include the following areas: Township 46 South, Range 28 East, Sections 26, 27, 34 and that portion of Section 35 not already included in the Area; Township 47 South, Range 28 East, the northern halves of Sections 2 and 3; Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Sections 7 and 8; Township 46 South, Range 30 East, Sections 30 and 31; and Township 46 South, Range 29 East, those portions of Sections 25 and 36 not already included in the Area. a .+.,.+ ay. c., c�.rr r,v, r✓o i•�11VU iCJ HIVV KCLVKLJ A RESOLUTION NO# 2004 - 394 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA TO EXIST, AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS, on Match 14, 2000, the Boats of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000.82, finding a specified area of Immokalee to be blighted and creating the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area (Area); and WHEREAS, on May 25. 2004, finding edJacent ponlons of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Aree to be blighted, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2004A 79, expanding the boundaries of the Area; and WHEREAS, on October 270 2004, the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended further expansion of the boundaries of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, as set forth in Exhibit A (Expanded Area); and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, the Community Redevelopment Area Board received and considered a report and presentation by County staff identifying current economic Conditions within this Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions in the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expended Area presented to it, the Board now Desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished in the Expanded Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Expanded Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED BY THE 80ARD OF COUNTY COMMiSS10NER8 OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Board Of County Commissioners, consistent with § 163.355, Fla. Stal. (2003), does hereby (Ind: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Page 1 of 3 YHl t 11b 8A " Board that the following conditions exist in the Expanded Area proposed to be added to the existing Immokslee Community Redevelopment Area: t. Past conditions continue to fIe prevent in the Expended Area that ere detrimental to the sound growth of the County and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area, and present conditions and uses In the Expanded Arse are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and public welfare; and 2. There la a faulty end inadequate let layout in relation to eiza, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness to the Expanded Area; and 3, The aggnsgele assessed ve{ues of real properly in tho Expanded Area for ed valorem tax purposes have faded to show any appreciable increase over the -past five years; and 4. Thera are inadequate end outdated building density padems in the Facpanded Area; and 6. There era unsanitary end unsafe condillona In the Expanded Area. (b) The notices required by Section 183.3A6 end Section 163.361 (3), Florida Statutes (2003), have been limely published or mailed in accordance with said statutes. (c) AIXion must be taken immediately to prevent fudher blight and detarioralion end to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made in the Expanded Area. Section 2, Finding of Neceashv. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon the evidence presented to d and in the public record with respect to the conditions found In Section t (a), above, finds that a "blighted area" as defined In $action 163,340 (8), Florida Statutes, exists within the boundaries of Collier County In the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution (the Expanded Area), and further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described is necessary in the Interest of the public health, safely, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida. Section 3. Community RedeveleomentNe�. Based upon the facts presented and contained In the public record, the Board of County Commissioners finds the Expanded Area constitutes a "commun{ty redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163.340 (10). Florida Statutes (2003); and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, Pepe 2 of 3 r Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions In conflict with any of the provisions of this resolutlon are hereby repealed, provided, howaver, nothing herein Is Intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act, specifically Including Resolution 2000.82. Secon 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a sacaon of this Resolution, including any part of Exhibits A and B, proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to Invalidate or Impair the valldity, forcee or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should any eras constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent jurisdiclion, the remainder shall constitute part of the Immokslae Community Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution. Section 8. EftectNa Date. Tltis Resoluiion shall become effective Immediately upon adoption. ,,,,(( This asolullun adopted after motion, second and majority vote this 1` "y of l ifd6M f .2004. •t:elrry '•• BOARD OF CDUNTY COMMISSIONERS i.8gt1COF COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA 1 By: IftAll n a DONNA PIALA, Chairman legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney Pepe 3 of 3 L�,i G1/Lgg0 it:[o Z39/74g9g8 MINUIES AND RECORDS PAGE 09 ,� 'L_;501/ZOOS 16:25 239774040B MINUTES AND RECORDS PAGE 10 EXH1t31T B Deacription of the Expanded Areas of the lmmokalee Community Redevelopment Area In addition to tho area described in Exhibit B of Resolution 2000-82, the Tmm0 ace Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to include the following areas: The southern halvcs of Sections 2 and 3, Township 47 South, Range 28 East; and the portions not already included in the Redevelopment Area of Sections 12, 13, and 14, Township 47 South, Range 29 East. Ciee, ORDINANCE NO. z0oo-42 N ORDINANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY,LORIDA, ESTABLISHING AEDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; PROVIDING FOR THE FUNDING OF A REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND FOR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; DETERMINING THE TAX INCREMENT TO BE DEPOSITED IN THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; ESTABLISHING THE BASE YEAR FOR DETERMINING ASSESSED VALUES OF PROPERTY IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA FOR TAX INCREMENT PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT BY TAXING AUTHORITIES IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; APPOINTING THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS THE TRUSTEE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; EXEMPTING CERTAIN SPECIAL DISTRICTS FROM THE ANNUAL REQUIREMENT TO APPROPRIATE INCREMENT REVENUES TO THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND jo AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE i-= PREPARATION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTING EACH SUCH EXEMPTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE ri- M DATE, -.,c; py N WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-82 adopted by t6mcounty Commission of Collier County, Florida (the "County Commission") on March 14, 2000, it was determined that one or more blighted areas exist within Collier County, Florida, and that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-83 adopted by the County Commission on March 14, 2000, the County Commission created the Community Redevelopment Agency of Collier County, Florida (the "Agency"); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000—adopted by the County Commission on June t3, 2000, tha County Commission adopted a community I redevelopment plan (the "Plan") for the community redevelopment area as fully described in that Resolution and in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Community Redevelopment Area");and WHEREAS, in order to plan and implement community redevelopment within the Community Redevelopment Area it Is necessary that a redevelopment trust fund be established and created for said area as provided in Section 163.387, Flodda Statutes (1999) (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, it is appropriate and reasonable for certain special taxing districts to be exempted from the requirement to make an annual appropriation of "Increment revenues" to the redevelopment trust fund being created by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, notice of the County Commission's intention to create a redevelopmeni trust Wnd has been published in a local newspaper of general circulation and mailed to all "taxing authorities" (as hereinafter defined) in accordance with Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1999); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY ERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. There is hereby established and created, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, a Community Redevelopment Trust Fund (the "Fund") for the Community Redevelopment Area, which fund shall be utilized and expended for the purposes of and In accordance with the Plan, Including any amendments or modiFlcations thereto, Including any "community redevelopment " as that term Is defined in Section 163.340(9), Florida Statutes (1999), under the Plan. SECTION 2. The monies to be allocated to and deposited Into the Fund shall be used to finance "community redevelopment" within the Area according to tax Increment revenues attdbuted to the Area, which shall be appropriated by the Agency. The Agency shall utilize the funds and revenues paid Into and earned by the Fund for community redevelopment purposes as provided in the Plan and as permitted by law. The Fund shall exist for fha duration of the "community redevelopment" undertaken by the Agency pursuant to the Plan to the extent permitted by the Acl. Monies shall be held 2 In the Fund by Collier County, for and on behalf of the Agency, and disbursed from the Fund as provided by the Agency. SECTION 3. There shall be paid into the Fund each year by each of the "taxing authorities," as that term Is defined in Section 163.340(2), Florida Statutes (1999) except for those special districts exempted from such requirement, levying ad valorem taxes within the Community Redevelopment Area, a sum equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the Incremental increase in ad valorem taxes levied each year by that taxing authority, as calculated in accordance with Section 5 of this Ordinance and the Act, based on the base tax year established In Section 4 of this Ordinance (such annual sum being hereinafter referred to as the "tax Increment'). SECTION 4. The most recent assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of property prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall be the assessment roll of taxable real property in Collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida, and certified pursuant to Section 193,122, Florida Statues (1999) reflecting valuation of real property for purposes of ad valorem taxation as of January 1, 1999 (the 'base year value"), and all deposits Into the Fund shall be In the amount of tax Increment calculated as provided in Section 5 hereof based upon increases in valuation of taxable real property from the base year value as reflected on the preliminary assessment roll of taxable real property in the community redevelopment area in the unincorporated area in collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida, filed with the Department of Revenue pursuant to Section 193,1142, Florida Statutes (1999), SECTION 5. The tax Increment shall be determined and appropriated annually by each taxing authority, and shall be an amount equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the difference between: (a) That amount of ad valorem taxes levied each year by all taxing authorities on taxable real properly located within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area; and (b) That amount of ad valorem taxes which would have been produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for all taxing authorities, upon the total of the assessed value of the taxable real property in the Community Redevelopment Area as shown upon the 3 assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by alI taxing authorities, prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. Ail taxing authorities shall annually appropriate to and cause to be deposited in the Fund the tax Increment determined pursuant to the Act and Section 5 of this Ordinance at the beginning of each fiscal year thereof as provided In the Act. The obligation of each taxing authority to annually appropriate the tax Increment for deposit in the Fund shall commence Immediately upon the effective date of this Ordinance and continue to the extent permitted by the Act so long as any Indebtedness pledging "increment revenue" is to be paid and so long as the Plan is in effect. SECTION 7. The fund shall be established and maintained as a separate trust fund by the Agency so that the Fund may be promptly and effectively administered and utilized by the Agency expeditiously and without undue delay for its statutory purpose pursuant to the Plan. SECTION 8. The governing body of the Agency shall be the trustees of the Fund and shall be responsible for the receipt, custody, disbursement, accountability, management, investment and proper application of all monies paid Into the Fund. SECTION 9. Pursuant to Section 163.387(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1999), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County, Florida, does hereby exempt the following special districts from the annual requirement to appropriate "increment revenues" and cause that amount to be deposited in the community redevelopment trust fund created by this ordinance: East Naples Fire District; Collier County Mosquito Control District; Big Corkscrew Fire District; and Immokalee Fire District, The appropriate County officials and consultants and advisors to the County and the CRA are hereby authorized and directed to prepare in conjunction with each such special district an Interlocal agreement establishing the conditions of the exemption, Including the period of time for which the exemption is granted. SECTION 10. Any and all ordinances or resolutions or parts of ordinances or resolutions In conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 11, If any part of this Ordinance Is held to be Invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Ordinance, which shall remain in /ull force and effect. SECTION 12. The Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, Is hereby authorized and directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to each of the taxing authorities and to the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida. SECTION 13. This Ordinance shall take effect Immediately upon Its passage and adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County the 13 day of June, 2000. `ATTEST:' BOARD OF CO TONERS ' DWIGHT C.-BRQCK, CLERK COLLIERC TY,FLORIDA 4 .4 i TIMOT J ONSTA H `2.. Attest 1Ar toCtietrwlm's s49AgElire only. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY This ordinance filed with the ar,{story of tote's Office the "uS day of -DzinQ and acknowledgement of that M•/// Y f!!!np received this 15-1 day David C. Weigel o� County Attorney BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 830', E 862', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E R/W LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 921, E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670% S 7731 , W 2009, S 735', W 200% S 990', E 4601, S 33019 E 9721, S 1174% SWLY 4811, NWLY 5230, W 95', SWLY 730' TO THE NELY R/W LINE U.S. 41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY R/W LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761% N 13551, W TO THE W RAN LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB, W 1001, N TO THE N RIW OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLYALG NLY RAN LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W RtW LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND BEG SE CNR SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, TOE'/. CNR SECT14, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR LOT 6, CREWS SUB, N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, E TO THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W RAN LINE OF PINE STREET, S TO THE S RIW LINE OF MANGROVE STREET, W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F, HALDEMAN RIVER SUB, S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14, TWP 60, RNG 259 S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE FOR BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TWP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 299 28, 27, AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW'/, OF SW %SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW'/. OF SW 1/4 SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W Y OF NW Y+ OF SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W'/: OF NW Y+ SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W 1/. CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S % CNR SEC 1 AND THE N'/. CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S %CNR SEC 12 AND THE N'% CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W % CNR SEC 13 AND THE E % CNR OF SEC 14, TWP 47, RNG 2% CONT W TO THE W 1% CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E % CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE E % CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. F Z W E a 3 }W W W J O E E 9 9V,1 S GV 1 I W W m m M N I M 5 N M V a Y�R RR�I o vl .- W W N � N N — � E u as E co ` s � ids � N - N y� W I W N C N M W Y o O 4. N 0 y S g ■ d A N r 1 5 a 4 59b1 5Lb1 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: {o ORDINANCE NO. 2000-42 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissions wn the 13th day of June, 2000, during Regular Session. rN N WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board N o� County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 14t:im day of June, 2000, DWIGHT E. BROCK :' Clerk of Courts land' Me 41,, .'.;:.` Ex-officio to Board of colf unty Commise�aners _ !i? : .E By:Karen Schoch,o Deputy Clerk �' Appendix A. VII RESOLUTION NO. 2019- 7 5 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AMENDED AND MODIFIED, PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, which is presently codified in Part III of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, a redevelopment plan must be adopted by the governing body to initiate redevelopment activities within the redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000-82 declared the need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and authorized the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan for the Bayshore Gateway study area; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-83 established the Board of County Commissioners as the Community Redevelopment Agency to carry out redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-181 adopted the Community Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has not approved an overall update to amend the Community Redevelopment Plan since the adoption of 2000-181; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission ("Local Planning Agency") conducted a formal review at a public hearing on March 21, 2019 and submitted its recommendations to the Community Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the recommendations from the Local Planning Agency were considered by the Community Redevelopment Agency at a meeting on March 26, 2019 and reviewed for inclusion into the CRA plan, as appropriate; and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency on April 23, 2019 voted to recommend approval of the amended CRA Plan and transmitted it to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, IN REGULAR SESSION DULY ASSEMBLED ON THIS 23rd DAY OF APRIL 2019 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; that: I. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan (Attachment "A") meets the requirements of Section 163.360, F.S.; H. The Board hereby finds, determines and declares that the notice requirements of Section 163.346 and 163.361(3), Florida Statutes and the public hearing requirements of Section 163.361(2), Florida Statutes have been met; III. The Board hereby fines, determines, and declares that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Collier County Growth Management Plan; and IV. That the Amendment to Collier County Community Redevelopment Area Plan is hereby approved and directs the CRA to proceed with implementation of the Plan. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 13 v- day of r 2019, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK B .-. Attest as to Chairs; TY cL signature only:; .. . Approved as to form and legality: Jennifer A. Bel io 's 1 Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 & I III, lim Is 4 / . 4 . +g 22 9c D& - \3 // Do s 00 // /\ \® / s >. ¥ APPENDIX C tit. k LL 4 if �. Sy [ iir - Iii Ac LI a 44 IN I_ ------------- �IN J a IN Now I 9 - s� HIM I! III ` IN LL i €� �yg —-— te fir Nor ¢@ = IN $ 1-1 E�IN IN I ! IL MI I,. IN S — - eN ill! La "ro n B H SL 1 �$ B S $_a -------------------- ----------------- --- - --- ---------------- [Jeff ir 9y j i r f iz - -- -- - - - -- -- - - - - i A 1010 04 az s. g94 g. Al 1 a ;S a !�jGp c OR CDIc P. o y' �Q^ = -D o sn^ O K aoo1 N z $R s y 4 M o ' _ o '.T III lill 11 I'll, I APPENDIX D- Gateway Triangle Stormwater Master Plan - 2006 GATEWAY TRIANGLE CONCEPTUAL STORMWATERMASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Section 3.0 Alternative No. 3A Alternative No. 3A is a variation of Alternative No. 3 developed in 1998 for the Gateway Triangle Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan- Alternative No. 3A is based on the future land uses established in the new Bayshore and Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan. Alternative No. 3A also includes projects that are currently under design to address existing problem areas - For areas undergoing complete redevelopment, permitting will require provision of an onsite stormwater management system to attenuate the 25-year, 3-day storm event, In addition, water quality improvements are required. The developer of the redevelopment areas will be required to construct a stormwater management system. Thus, improvements by the County are not required for the areas that will be completely redeveloped. Areas that are assumed to have new stormwater management system built as part of redevelopment are described below. • The area west of Commercial Drive defined by US-41 and Davis Boulevard is designated a moderate activity center which includes a hotel, restaurants, offices and other commercial uses. Complete redevelopment of this 14.8-acre area is assumed. • The area bounded by Davis Boulevard, Commercial Drive, US-41 and the Linwood Outfall Ditch is designated office/warehouse. This 25-acre area could either undergo complete redevelopment or existing users may remain in upgraded facilities. Improvements for this area will be identified for the case bf upgrading existing facilities instead of complete redevelopment. The Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan identified two potential stormwater pond sites in the redevelopment areas- The ponds are located at the westernmost point of the Gateway Triangle adjacent to US-41 and Davis Boulevard and betweeri Linwood Avenue and Francis Avenue west of the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Actual stormwater pond locations will be determined during the design phase of the redevelopment. The Gateway Triangle east of the 'Linwood Outfall Ditch is projected to undergo restructured development- Restructured development does not include complete redevelopment. Thus, developers will not be required to provide comprehensive stormwater management systems. Redevelopment provides the opportunity to create detention areas and .regrade the site to improve drainage conditions. Restructured development does not create open areas for stormwatcr detention nor does it allow for elevating structures. Restructured development limits stormwater management improvements to providing detention in open areas and working within the existing topographical constraints. Stormwater management improvements in the restructured development areas will be made to address existing drainage problem areas, The drainage problem areas in the restructured { development area are listed below. lWxmV/ bi95 RI Ib4.RT,RFP 34 Gateway Triangle. Conceptual Stormwater Master Plant Technical Memorandum • Kirkwood Avenue — Only if the area does not undergo complete redevelopment. • . Property fronting Davis Boulevard north of Wild Pines Apartments. - The Linwood Outfall Ditch, especially property on Manorca Drive adjacent to the ditch. • Pelton Avenue at the intersection with US-41. In addition to the improvements recommended to address problem areas, additional maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing stormwater management system- is recommended for the restructured development area. Additional maintenance will restore the hydraulic capacity of the Stormwater management system. Additional hydraulic capacity will decrease the duration of flooding since the water can be conveyed more quickly _through the system. Rehabilitation only will not significantly decrease the frequency of flooding, except perhaps in cases where flooding is minor and caused by a clogged catch basin, pipe or Swale. Additional maintenance and rehabilitation will allow the existing system to operate at its maximum capacity, which will provide the highest tevel of service for the existing system. The specific maintenance activities are provided below. 1. Reerade swales every two Years — 36,000 ,feet per year including the area between Comttiercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,500 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch, 2. Mow and clean swales once per month — 36,000 feet per year including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,560 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. 3. Clean pipes and catch basins one additional time per Year - 75 catch basins including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 55 catch basins excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Study includes identification of one site for storntwater retention wi#hin the Shadowlawn Neighborhood Focus Initiative. This Bike is the property recently acquired by the County for use as a stormwater detention site. The project has been named Pond 2A. A piping network will convey the runoff .to Pond 2A, an apptaximate 2,5-acre proposed Stormwater detention pond located adjacent to the Linwood Outfall Ditch.'Discharge from the pond will be through an overflow structure into the Linwood Outfall Ditch. During low flow conditions stormwater will be routed to the detention pond. Piping is provided for higher flow conditions to discharge into the storm sewer on Commercial Drive. The County has purchased the detention pond site and the project is under design. This project includes 13 catch basins, 1950 linear feet (It) of 24" RCP and 4501f of 18" RCP. The project includes construction of the Pond-2A detention pond and improvements to the Linwood Outfall Ditch, Kirkwood Avenue west of Avondale Drive is a major problem drainage area. A Stormwater management system including additional catch basins and piping connected to a detention pond are recommended to improve drainage conditions in this area. Nine catch basins are proposed to collect runoff. Storm drains wial include approximately 1100 if of 15" RCP, 450 If of 18" RCP and 350 if of 24" RCP. These quantities do not include catch basins and storm sewers that are .: included in the Kirkwood Extension project. LK/VlORK/6293-RI163-RT.RLP 3^2 Gatawav Triangle Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan Technical Metnorandurn Parcels that front on Davis Boulevard north of Wild Pines Apartments have drainage problems, especially at Naples Rent -All. The northern half of the parcels drain to Davis Boulevard while the southern half originally drained to the Linwood Outfall Ditch via overland flow. The Wild Pines Apartments were constructed with a perimeter berm. This berm impedes the southerly overland flow from the parcels fronting on Davis Boulevard. An extension of the catch basin and storm sewer system on Kirkwood Avenue, is recommended to address this problem area. The Kirkwood Extension project will require 5 catch basins, 4 manholes, 125 If of 15" RCP, 166 If of 18" RCP and 411 if of 24" RCP. Drainage easements are required for this project, This project has been designed and should be bid by May 2000. Poltoit Avenue is another drainage problem area, specifically near the intersection o£ US-41. A system of catch basins and .pipes is recommended to address problems in the area by diverting a significant part of the basin drainage away from the Pelton StreeUUS-41 intersection into an existing drainage ditch that connects to the US-41 system. This project requires 12 catch basins and approximately 1500 feet of piping ranging in diameter from IV to 24". Improvements may be needed in the existing drainage ditch, Drainage problems are reported along the Linwood Outfall Ditch. A particular problem area is a low4ying home on the west end of Manorca Drive. Improvements to address this problem include expanding the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Widening of the ditch will provide greater storage volume, In addition, berming the ditch may help alleviate flooding on Manorca Drive, Figure 2 shows the proposed improvements. Table 1 provides a conceptual capital cost estimate. Table 2 provides a conceptual O&M cost estimate. �r�wowvazss.se�esatnre 3-3 TABLE 1 ALTERNATIVE NO.3A • CONCEPTUAL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE" Estimated Estimated Project Construction Project Cost (S) Cost (S) Detention Pond 2A and Piping 410,300 5355000 Kirkwood Avenue 144,400 190,000 (West of Avondale) Kirkwood Avenue Extension 78,0004 89005 Pelton Avenue 1227700 160,000 Linwood Outfall Ditch 492800 65,000 TOTAL 805,200 1,039,800 • Notes: 1 Property costs are izOt included. s Itemized construction cost estimate is provided in the appendix a Estimated project costs includes 15% contingency, 12%engineering and 3% admin. n Detailed construction cost estimate based on design drawings is included in. appendix. s Estimated project cost includes estimated construction cost and actital engineering cost. TABLE 2 ALTERNATIVE1V06 CONCEPTTJAL O&M COST ESTIMATE Gateway Triangle Gateway Triangle" East of Commercial Drive East of Linwood Cost ($) Outfall Ditch cost ($� Regrade Sw es First two years 84,000 73,500 Subsequent years 21,000 18,500 Mow & Clean Swales 18,000 15,500 Clean Pipes & Catch Basins• I7,000 12,500 TOTAL ANNUAL COST First two years 119,000 101,500 Subsequent years 56,000 46;500 414WOA1U6395n114SAY.AEP �„5 r'- APPENDIX D Table 1 Detalied Cost Mae- Alternative 3A Rounded Unit Construction Project Project Description Quantity Units Cost ($) Cost ($} Cost ($) Cast ($) Kiritwood Ave. (West of Avondale) 24" RCP 350 If 90 31,500 16" RCP 450 if 75 33,750 15" RCP 1100 If 65 71,500 Manholes 0 ea 2000 0 Catch Basins 9 on 850 71650 2d" RCP 400 if 90 36,OD0 18" RCP 500 If 75 37,5D0 15" RCP 600 If 65 39,600 Catch Basins 12 ea 850 10,200 Subtotal 122,700 Excavation 4150 cy 12 49 800 64,740 ' 65,000 Detention Pond 2A and Piping _ 24" RCP' 1950 If 90 175,500 18" RCP 450 If 75 33,750 Manholes 1 ea 2000 2100D —. Catch Basins 13 ea 860 111050 ' Excavation - Pond 13,000 cy 12 156,000 Excavation - Ditch 21500 cy 12 30,000 Discharge Structure 1 ea 2000 2,000 Subtotal 4101300 5330390 5351Q00 GRAND TOTAL, 950,000 * Refer to project cost estimate "' Based on 650 ft ditch excavated 5 ft deep with 35 ft width '(t Kirkwood Avenue Extension Drainage Improvement Project Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Unit Item Unit Pace Quantity 4 Cost Standard Manhole, Type P-a ea 1960 I 4 7840 Catch Basins Index 233 (Type G) ea 3400 4 13600 Index232 (type D) ea 1725 2 3450 15" RCP If 37.5 128 4800 18" RCP if 45 166 7470 24" RCP If 60 411 24660 24" Snout ea 300 6 1800 Concrete Cradle OR 200 3 600 Roadway Restoration asphalt sy 5 327 1635 Limerook base course sy 6.5 327 2126 Asphalt Overlay sy 3 654 1962 Sodding sy 1,25 _ .250. 313 Seeding sf 0.12 820 96 Connection to existing pipe ea 200 1 200 Mobil., Demob., Bonds, etc. Is 3700 1 3700 Subtotal 74253 Contingency (M 5% 3713 TOTAL 77966 APPENDIX E o� O N W H Z W 0 _l W W W r' LL 0 w Q H U) W Q W Q 0 W 0 CO m W X. 0 Z W VIA El � I. i Yi �AI� 4Ir4AB��oi�.^'18�'vjA ' olol$ j$ 01 o 1 ol o!a'�I ! i pp t Ell N� t �, 01 NN ml F1 � i i" in o B o' m is xi fa all n — �I Q!1 N z "D iINI pill 1 I Ii I i M APPENDIX F T46S T47S T48S T495 T58S Mr. o Y �� .S i 1➢� B 3 S �F �l °�€ 0o�1o1i'oilo��loomlo®a tt � € a 9 t c B W€€ ?H 3l4 1���If1��ID1$1111 I, RAIN w DOM ®ogee 1111 1 §I111111 11101 a - w CCO) w n N G a o n Z a N — p J N lL U w � rc � LL c � T 51S I T52S I T53S M g..^ ps `•& �?� `.', wR WCWA Z G mEg E�m �� exti�o Gulf of M T FnC TAlC rc