Loading...
Agenda 04/21/2022 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 4/14/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 April 21, 2022 9: 00 AM Edwin Fryer- Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Karl Fry- Secretary Christopher Vernon Paul Shea, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Robert Klucik, Jr. Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. April 2022 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 4/14/2022 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. February 17, 2022, CCPC Meeting Minutes B. March 17, 2022, CCPC Meeting Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Amendment - A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County amending Resolution No. 2011-201, Development Order 2011-05, for Hacienda Lakes, a Development of Regional Impact to modify maps H-2, H-3, H-4 and map O, by changing the Business Park and Residential Tract lines, removing references to the RV Tract and adding access points along the northern DRI boundary. The subject property consisting of 2262± acres is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and north and south of Sabal Palm Road Sections 11 through 14 and 23 through 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; and providing for transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; and providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] April 2022 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 4/14/2022 2. PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, to change the Business Park and Residential Tract lines, remove the RV Tract and add access points along the northern MPUD boundary; by revising development standards; and by adding deviations. The subject property, consisting of 2,262+/- acres is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and north and south of Sabal Palm Road in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] B. Noticed 10. Old Business 11. New Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 04/21/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 5.A Item Summary: February 17 2022, CCPC Meeting Minutes March 17, 2022, CCPC Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: 04/21/2022 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Planning Commission Name: Diane Lynch 03/31/2022 5:28 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/31/2022 5:28 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 03/31/2022 5:28 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/04/2022 3:00 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 04/07/2022 4:03 PM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 04/11/2022 4:21 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/21/2022 9:00 AM 5.A Packet Pg. 4 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida February 17, 2022 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Edwin Fryer, Chairman Karen Homiak, Vice Chair Karl Fry Joe Schmitt Paul Shea Robert L. Klucik, Jr. (attending remotely) Christopher T. Vernon Tom Eastman, Collier County School Board Representative ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney February 17, 2022 Page 1 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) P R O C E E D I N G S MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Mr. Bosi. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the February 17, 2022, meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. We haven't seen one another for a while, so I'll say welcome back to all. Good to see you. Will everyone please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Secretary Fry, would you please call the roll, sir. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Eastman? MR. EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Shea? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Here. I'm here. Chairman Fryer? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Vice Chair Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Vernon? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Present. COMMISSIONER FRY: Present. Oh, remote. Mr. Chairman, we have a quorum of seven. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: That was scary. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. We're going to need to deal with an issue that we cannot avoid, and that is when we have a commissioner who wishes to participate remotely, under the ordinance we've got to establish the existence of extraordinary circumstances, which is a decision that we as the Planning Commission can make, but we have to do that. Did I say that correctly, County Attorney? MR. KLATZKOW: I couldn't have said that better myself. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, thank you very much. So let me ask Commissioner Klucik -- and it's certainly nothing personal against you, sir. We want to find a way to get you to participate. But the standard now under the new law is extraordinary circumstances. So you have the floor. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, I mean, we have one agenda item, and it's not controversial, and it -- you know, it would take me more time to drive in and, you know, harming the environment as well to make all that carbon. You know, and that's -- seriously, it's -- I think our agenda is so light today that it doesn't make sense to waste resources coming in. I think that's an extraordinary circumstance but, obviously, that's up to you-all to decide whether you think that's true or not. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I make a motion that we allow for remote, I guess, or extraordinary circumstances for remote participation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So a finding of extraordinary circumstances? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Is there a second to that? COMMISSIONER FRY: Well, I have a question. February 17, 2022 Page 2 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, we're going to have discussion. See if we can get a second first and then -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Second. Okay. Now let's have discussion. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: My only -- obviously, I would like Robb to participate. But my only question is, if we grant extraordinary circumstances for this, what would not be extraordinary circumstances in the future? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I share the same concern. And the two concerns you expressed, the first one, that we -- that we don't want to deprive Commissioner Klucik of participating, but we've got -- I mean, we're saddled with a statute or an ordinance, rather, that speaks in terms of extraordinary circumstances which it's our prerogative to find and we can, and a motion's been duly made and seconded. I'm uneasy voting yes on this unless it's yes with caveats going forward. I think I could see my way clear on that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I didn't -- I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman. I didn't catch the -- I didn't catch the "unless" part. It was broken up. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh. I'm concerned about setting a precedent because one could argue, I think, rather persuasively that these are not extraordinary circumstances; however, you did bring forth points that have been considered and, in fact, were sufficient for one commissioner to move and another to second that you be allowed to participate. I could see myself voting in favor of this but with a caveat that the next time this comes around I'd like to hear more extraordinary circumstances before I would personally be able to vote yes. And I don't know what other commissioners have to say about this. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Can I add, from a standpoint of participation from Immokalee, of course, it's a long drive. Many years ago this board approved and the Board of County Commissioners approved a -- the ability to request compensation for cost of travel from Immokalee. And from that standpoint, in this regard, since it's only one item, I think the -- having -- not having to request compensation for travel from Immokalee, that it was in the best interest of the government to avoid having to make that payment and just have him participate by phone. So I think that's a circumstance we ought to consider. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good point. I'd like to hear from other Planning Commissions before we call the question. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Does this set a precedent that the next time the same argument would be considered unusual circumstances since we voted on it today? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Because I personally don't feel like it is even though I seconded it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: When it comes to rezones, we don't establish precedence for ourselves. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And that is the teaching of our County Attorney and has been for a long, long time. Each case is unique. But the question here is not quite like that, because two or three circumstances have been stated, and if those very same two or three circumstances are stated again, if not a legal precedent, it would arguably be a rational precedent to follow. And I think I'm starting to see where I want to go on this, but -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Can we ask a procedural question? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sure. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So if we vote that he can't participate, can he listen and offer comment and just not vote? What does that mean if we say no? CHAIRMAN FRYER: County Attorney? MR. KLATZKOW: If the -- if the Planning Commission says no, we're going to turn the February 17, 2022 Page 3 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) phone off. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, my concern is that this petition involves a request from Immokalee. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Exactly. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And I think it's in the best interest of the community and of the county staff as well as the applicant that we hear from our representative from Immokalee. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. MR. KLATZKOW: Can we just get some perspective on this. The rule that you must be in person absent extraordinary -- a finding of extraordinary circumstances is an Attorney General Opinion. It's not a statute. There's no case law on this. Just one opinion. And the opinion's been followed in this state ever since by everybody, but with the advent of COVID it got relaxed, and people have not returned back to the practice they had before. We've got, on the TDC, a member that frequently if not always appears remotely. We've had other advisory boards do the same. It's your finding for extraordinary circumstances, but I will tell you that unless Mr. Wright would object -- would you object to the remote participation, Jeff? MR. WRIGHT: No. He'll be sitting where our project is, so we're fine with that. MR. KLATZKOW: So since -- there's no harm no foul in it with any waiver of objection. So, again, it's completely your discretion. But 2022 is a different world than 2018, and the legislation hasn't caught up with it yet. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Vice Chair. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FRYER: One second, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I just think maybe since it is in the -- he represents that district -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's another factor, yeah. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: -- this time we would allow it. I don't think it should be all the time, but... CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon, did you want to be heard on this? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, I just -- Commissioner Klucik, I didn't think his circumstances that he identified are extraordinary, and I don't think we should follow that rule. I think what Joe said is an extraordinary circumstance, so I think we should let him participate remotely based on the extraordinary circumstance outlined by Commissioner Schmitt. And I do think Commissioner Schmitt also brings up a good point, it's a struggle here, because I think from a public perception standpoint, we should all be here in person. But, at the same time, I don't want to chill who we get as a candidate because they're all the way out in Immokalee, and it is a burden to come all the way from Immokalee. So I guess my point of view is we should go ahead and vote for him to participate today remotely based on the extraordinary circumstances set forth but that we probably ought to have a bigger discussion maybe on another day how we address the issue that Immokalee is a long way away from this building, and we want the best candidates participating, but we would, for a lot of reasons, prefer to have them here in person. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Mr. Eastman, and then we'll ask Mr. Klucik to speak again. MR. EASTMAN: I agree with everything that was said and support Commissioner Schmitt and just wanted to add that we can make a decision specific to this particular item; therefore, it's not precedential at all. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Interesting point. Thank you. Anybody else want to be -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Just one more comment. February 17, 2022 Page 4 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Paul Midney did come from Immokalee, and he did it for years, and he was here every meeting unless he was in whatever country he went to on vacation where his wife lived. That was it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And that was one of the reasons he offered -- back even when I was part of the staff we offered compensation for travel, which I don't know if he ever submitted, but it was certainly an option. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I think he did. Did he? Yeah, yeah, I thought he did. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I would simply say that I certainly -- you know, everyone's making good points, and I think this is something that it would make perfect sense, and I think it would be -- I would hope that's what, you know, the Commission would do. We would judge each situation and make a call, and if it's -- you know, if it seems like it's abusive, you know, then, obviously, that's a -- you know, that can be voted no if -- you know, if I were to ask every time, for instance, to do that, then I wouldn't expect that to be approved. I think, you know, each meeting is going to present different circumstances. And I certainly understand that it's far better for me to be there in person and, you know, would make every effort to do that when -- when it doesn't seem that the circumstances would be appropriate to request otherwise. So I appreciate everyone's consideration. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: So, Robb, my question is, how do you determine when you feel it's worth making the trip? I mean, you said this is one item. It's not contested. Moving forward -- I'm inclined to vote for it today, but I believe you lose a lot by not being here, and you just said it, and I think it was part of the commitment we made. And I realize you live out there. I'm going to consider compensation. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: In this case, speaking -- I'm sorry. You're -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Oh, I was just going to say I would vote for -- I would vote for it for this one case. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: In this case, you know, just speaking with staff, it seemed like it was extremely -- right. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think Commissioner Fry is in the middle of a sentence. COMMISSIONER FRY: I would just say, Robb, I mean, I will vote for it for this agenda item, but moving forward I would find it more difficult to do so because I do think there's a lot lost when you're not here. I think your input is valuable, and I think it's part of the commitment we made. If compensation has to be put on the table, I'd be happy to have that conversation. I just -- I think that you should be here. I think you add more value when you're here, and it's -- we all make the commitment. I don't believe it's our role to judge when it's important for us to be here or not. I think it's a part of the commitment that we made. I understand it's a long drive. So I would just say, moving forward I'm going to have a hard time voting for it again, but today I absolutely will. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And no one else is signaling. I'm going to vote yes on it today, and Commissioner Fry expressed my reservations well, so I won't repeat them. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor of finding extraordinary circumstances and permitting Commissioner Klucik to participate remotely, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. February 17, 2022 Page 5 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Welcome, Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. So we are a full house. We've got seven. Addenda to the agenda. I'm going to say a couple things and then turn it over to Mr. Bellows. First of all, I see that the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle murals matter has been continued indefinitely. It had been continued to a date certain, namely today. And I had a conversation with staff about this. I just want to get -- make public what has gone on, not much, but a little bit has gone on in the background, so that the public knows where we are, why we're not hearing that at this meeting. And also I'm going to ask for a status report on the Golden Gate Golf Course project which I know is coming up on 3/17. But if there's something more you want to say about it, that would be great as well. So, County Attorney. MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah, on the mural, I hijacked it. Based on the comments from the Planning Commission, I basically hijacked the process. I've completely revamped it. It's going to come back to you as a grant program. COMMISSIONER VERNON: As a what? MR. KLATZKOW: As a grant program. So if somebody wants to apply for a mural, if it's accepted, we'll help finance the mural. With that -- since you can pay for whatever you want to pay for, it gets rid of the content-neutral issue. The ordinance has been prepared. It's submitted to staff. Staff is reviewing it. It's going to have to go to, I imagine, the advisory board, the CRA, for them to review, but that's what's going to come to this board. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, County Attorney. And, Commissioner Klucik, thank you. When you brought that up, I shared those same concerns, regulation of speech based upon content is just not permissible under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. So I'm glad that this is being looked at again, and I'm sure that when it comes back it's going to be stronger and more defensible. MR. KLATZKOW: Oh, it's going to be outstanding. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I know it's in good hands. Thank you for that. Then anything further on the golf course? It's coming back on the 17th, but any further to report specifically? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. Nothing further. This is being processed like any other land-use item, and it's as scheduled for the 17th. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you very much. Last thing that I want to mention under amendments to the agenda is I know that we have all assessed the agenda for today and have probably come to the conclusion that it's going to be a very short meeting. And when I look at the absence of people in the chambers here, I suspect that it will, indeed, be a short meeting. However, this might be a decent time, when we come to old business and new business, if there are things that a planning commissioner wants to bring up to talk about, not to extend this inordinately, but that might be a good time. And I've got one thing that I'd like to bring up at that point, and I'll save it for then. But others be thinking, if you've got something that you want to bring up for just discussion, today would be a good day because of the absence of a lengthy agenda. February 17, 2022 Page 6 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) And with that, I will go to approval. Oh, Planning Commission absences. We're not meeting on March 3rd, correct? MR. BELLOWS: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. But everything seems to have -- will have caught up with us by the time of March 17, and based on the look-ahead that Mr. Bellows sent out, we're going to have a busy day on the 17th. So I'd ask anyone know whether he or she will not be able to attend on the 17th? COMMISSIONER VERNON: St. Patrick's Day. You're going to make me work on St. Patrick's Day? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we'll get you out of here before 5:00 p.m. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: You can drink. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, Mr. Bosi. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's a voluntary position. You can have all you want. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: Thank you, Chair. Mike Bosi, Zoning Director. One question I did want to broach with the Planning Commission related to the St. Patrick's Day, March 17th agenda. There's five items on it, and I had coordinated with Housing. Housing was going -- it was intended and wants to provide a Housing 101 overview to the Planning Commission to talk about affordable housing, the issue of supply and demand, where we're at, where we hope to be, some of the initiatives that the Board or the Planning Commission is going to be presented in short order within the next couple months related to some additional affordable housing initiatives that were recommended back from the 2017 ULI Housing Plan that the Board recommended the final list, so to speak, related to Growth Management Plan amendments and LDC amendments. The question was, would we like to still -- I mean, we've got five petitions. We've got a golf course, a GMP, there's a couple other PUDs. Would we like to try to get that in on the 17th, or should we just plan on deferring that to the next meeting, the 7th, where we have a little bit more, I think, time on the agenda? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would recommend we defer it. I don't see how we're going to have time to cover that subject plus -- I believe what I saw was five petitions -- MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- being proposed. COMMISSIONER SHEA: It actually would be nice to have it today. MR. BOSI: I agree. I agree and that's -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We're ready right now. We're ready. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: The question I have is -- I don't know, maybe it's just me, but I never -- I come to a meeting, and I find out there's no meeting on the 3rd. Either I'm out of the loop or we're all out of the loop, but I should -- if you know about, it I should know about it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I only saw it because Ray's -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: I haven't seen it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- future planning chart indicated there was no meeting, and I got the email yesterday. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's the -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, my email account is locked out with the county. It does that all around -- every month around the time of our meetings. So I can't catch the last three days of emails till after the meeting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm not sure why that happens, but obviously it's persistent, and you've mentioned it numerous times. And I -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Perhaps they're telling you something, Paul. February 17, 2022 Page 7 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER SHEA: I know. That's what I asked. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And I wonder -- I mean, I don't want to overload your personal email or to -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: I'm fine with using personal email but not publishing it for the general population to reach out to me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. I understand. And -- well -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: But was there something put out? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, a look-ahead went out. COMMISSIONER SHEA: The look-ahead is how we would know. I would suggest, if you're going to cancel the meeting, the minute you know you send a note to all of us saying the meeting is canceled so we don't have to fend through a document and maybe miss it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Then the question becomes, to who -- how should you be addressed? Which medium? Which email to get it to be sure you get it? COMMISSIONER SHEA: If it's internal, I'm fine with my personal email address for Ray, yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Good. Then that's what we'll do. I found out about it on Tuesday because I have a regular meeting with staff, but I know some others do not. All right. So that covers the 17th. I believe everyone -- or no one indicated that they would not be able to be here. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I do have to leave early. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER VERNON: So I'd probably be able to be here till about 4:00. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Oh, yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. But around 4:00 on St. Patrick's Day I think we're all going to want to be getting out of here. COMMISSIONER VERNON: It's not a party. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I was going to say. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I swear, it's not a party. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Maybe we can tell by the way you're dressed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's right. We've got Commissioner Fry who wishes to speak. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mike, I wanted to clarify, there are no issues on the 17th where that affordable housing presentation would be of value, correct? MR. BOSI: Oh, yeah, there are -- I mean, there is an affordable housing component to the golf course provision, but that is 100 percent affordable housing that's allocated within the county-owned property. I'm not really -- it's going to add -- it's going to help with the situation that you're going to have the overview on, so I don't believe that it's imperative that the Housing 101 be provided before you hear the golf course conversion application. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. I just wanted to make sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And one of the items, perhaps the only item that I'm going to bring up when we come to old business or new business, has to do with the Affordable Housing Committee and us having representation on there. So I'll bring that up at the appropriate time. Anything else under Planning Commission absences? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, approval of minutes. And we have fully six sets of minutes before us this morning for action. Those are meetings of October 21; November 4; November 18, 2:00 p.m.; November 18, 5:05 p.m.; December 2nd; and December 16. Now, I have a number of proposed changes on the October 21 minutes. They were taken by a substitute court reporter who did the best job she possibly could but doesn't have the same institution memory that our regular court reporter does, and so she's to be forgiven. But there were a number of needed corrections in those minutes. February 17, 2022 Page 8 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) So with that I'm going to ask Mr. Bosi to put something up on the machine. Okay. And I'll go through these real quickly. First of all, starting on Page 2, I voted that I was here, so that needs to be added. On Page 2 again, the secretary said, "Chairman, I have a quorum of seven," and the word "forum" was typed instead of "quorum." So that change needs to be made. Page 12, I voted against that motion and that -- my vote -- my no vote was not reflected. Page 13, the sentence says, "It is also relative to change and conditions," and what is meant, I believe, was "change in conditions." Page 19, County Attorney Klatzkow is recorded to have said "you," meaning the Planning Commission, should be a rubber -- "should be rubber stamping it," and I know that he meant "shouldn't be rubber stamping it." So that change. Then on Page 19 we referred to as the CCP and, of course, we're not the Communist Party of China, so we need to add another C on the end of that so it says CCPC. Also, Page 22, it says "Emergency Medical Authorities." It should be "authority." On page 22, the word "sway" is used, and what I said was "assuage," and the word "drill" was used, and what was typed was "grill." And, again, on Page 22 a second time "grill" needs to be changed to "drill." Page 22, again, the sheriffs, plural, and it needs to be the sheriff singular. Page 31, Eric Fey's name was spelled F-y-e-y, instead of F-e-y. Page 32 it says, "to be a saddle in the back of the taxpayers," and what was meant was a "saddle on the back." Page 34, "pass them up to the Board of County Commissioners for the recommendation of approval," and what was meant was "with the recommendation of approval." Then on Page 35, Commissioner -- oops, Commissioner Homiak was quoted as saying "long for me," and, of course, we all long for Commissioner Homiak, but what she meant was "none for me." She was talking about ex parte communications. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Thank you. I had that one. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. But we do long for you. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I'm glad to hear that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yep. Page 46, Mike Bosi was referred to as "my Bosi" and, of course, he is our Bosi, so we'll put that back to "Mike." Then on Page 57, the word that I used was "ceded," c-e-d-e-d, and what was typed was s-e-a-t-e-d, so that change also needs to be made on 58. And those are all the changes I have. Did I miss any? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any other changes for that set of minutes? (No response.) MR. EASTMAN: Thank you for that review. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion on the minutes of the 21st? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, I'd entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Make a motion to approve every one of the -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: As amended? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- minutes as amended. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Okay. If we may, let's just do the 21st. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Make a motion to approve the 21st as amended. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRY: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Minutes as amended. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. February 17, 2022 Page 9 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you very much. Now, the remaining five I don't have any changes on, and so if no one else has any changes, I think we don't -- we don't need to divide the question. We can vote on them all at once. And I'm looking up and down the dais here, and it doesn't appear that -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I'll make a motion to approve all the remaining minutes on our agenda. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you very much. Now, BCC report. Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. Since the last Planning Commission meeting, the Board of County Commissioners met twice. The first one was on January 25th. During that meeting they approved St. Matthew's House CPUD by 5-0 subject to the Planning Commission recommendations, and then on their summary agenda, they approved the Crews Road RPUD, a residential Planned Unit Development. Then on February 8th, the Board of County Commissioners, meeting as the Board of Zoning Appeals, approved the Benton Road communication tower conditional-use application, and that was 5-0. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. I'll point out also that the St. Matthew's matter passed by a vote of 3-2, and the Vice Chair and I were the 2. And I'm very glad to report that the parties got together and resolved the concerns that we'd expressed about security. So it shows that sometimes what we do matters. Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: And I just wanted to just remind the Planning Commission and the viewing audience, the Planning Commission did a tremendous job on that. There was two hearings, and we thought we were going to have the entire replay of those two hearings play out in front of the Board of County Commissioners, and in the last minute they came to an agreement, and I think it has everything to do with the amount of time and the effort and the energy and the focus that the Planning Commission applied to that petition. So, absolutely, the work that you guys do within February 17, 2022 Page 10 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) these chambers most certainly has value. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Mr. Bosi. And my compliments, of course, to the Planning Commission for the very same reasons. Chairman's report, I've got a couple things here. First of all, a very happy note, congratulations are in order to our own Trinity Scott and Jamie French. On February 8, 2022, on recommendation of County Manager Mark Isackson, the Board of County Commissioners promoted Ms. Scott to the position of Department Head Transportation Management Services and promoted Mr. French to the position of department Head Growth Management Community Development. Both have been serving as deputy department heads. So let's please have a hearty round of applause for Trinity and Jamie. (Applause.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Jamie's come a long way. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Second, just as a matter that I was going to bring up, when we -- when we hear the golf course, but I'll say it now anyway, that in -- or on April 29 of 2021, the Florida legislature passed House Bill 487, and the Governor signed it into law. It's legislation that basically increased the maximum of acreage of what we call small-scale comprehensive plan amendments from 10 acres to 50 acres, and that's why the golf course qualifies as a small-scale Growth Management Plan. But I wanted to bring that to everyone's attention. And that is all I have under Chairman's report. Consent agenda, none today. ***Public hearings, we have one, and I see Mr. Wright at the ready. And this is PL20210001637. It's a CPUDA for the Immokalee 7-Eleven Commercial Planned Unit Development, CPUD. All those wishing to testify in this matter, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Ex parte disclosures, if I may, starting with Mr. Eastman. MR. EASTMAN: None. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff materials only. COMMISSIONER FRY: Ditto. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Staff materials and my meeting with staff. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: None for me. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Meeting with staff. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Nothing to report; none from me as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik? Commissioner Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just staff -- meeting with staff; that was it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. With that, we will begin with applicant's -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just meeting with the staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, sir. We heard you. Thank you very much. Mr. Wright, the Chair recognizes you. MR. WRIGHT: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. I'm Jeff Wright with the Henderson Franklin law firm here on behalf of the applicant. We have our project team with us today: Lauren Evans, our project manager; Fred Drovlic, our planner; Michelle Salberg, our engineer; and Yury Bykau, our transportation consultant. We're here seeking your recommendation of approval to amend the Immokalee 7-Eleven CPUD to remove the car wash use and to add eating place with drive-through and also food store uses to the existing PUD. The location -- this might look familiar. You saw it not too long ago. I think it was May that this was before you. It was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in June. But February 17, 2022 Page 11 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) the project's located at the northwest corner of 9th and Main. It's about three acres in size. And we've reviewed the staff report. We agree with staff's analysis and the recommendation of approval. We're not adding any deviations. There is one existing deviation from the prior approval relating to parking on the frontage towards Main Street. We're not -- we're not going to add any deviations beyond that existing one staying in place. And with that, like I said, we agree with staff's recommendation of approval. And Fred's going to get into some more of the details in his presentation. With that, I'll turn it over to Fred. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Mr. Wright. MR. DROVLIC: Good morning. Thanks for your time and your effort. My name's Fred Drovlic from RVI Planning. And I'll go over some details. I know this is not overly complicated, but I do want to reorient because there's some minor changes to the site plan, and so I don't want to assume that everything's just fine. So I'll go into a little bit of detail and then be here for questions. So the site plan -- this is the new site plan. I'll have the next slide that will compare the previously approved to this one so that we can see it side by side. I just wanted to go over quickly what is already approved and what we're proposing on this site plan. So the food store itself, the convenience store in the center that's marked "food store," is up to 5,250 square feet. We haven't changed the number of pumps. It's still eight MPDs, which is 16 fueling positions. And we have not changed the amount of diesel -- the amount of fueling positions in the diesel canopy. That still remains four. There's indoor eating areas and outdoor seating areas. As we'll see the outdoor seating moved from two different places, one to front and one to back, and we consolidated to a larger place in the rear. There's still two pedestrian connections, one on North 9th and one on Main Street, and there's a -- up front on the corner of north -- of North 9th and West Main, there's going to be a concrete area that's going to be able to be for pedestrians to sit or, you know, there'll be probably a bench or some kind of design there for people to be able to sit that's consistent with the rest of that stretch of the roadway. Bike racks at the rear, and potential -- the vehicle interconnection to the west with shared access easement provided. That's -- up where it's marked "dumpster location," there's dotted lines, and we're still providing a potential interconnect to the property next door. This property's three acres. The property next door's four acres. And this was originally one parcel that has been -- will be subdivided and re-platted for this three-acre parcel for the gas station. There's still a four-acre parcel that remains to potentially be developed commercially, so there's an interconnection there. Here is the side-by-side, and I highlighted a few things. So on your left the proposed amendment -- amended site plan, I highlighted the things that have either moved a little bit or changed and some of the things that haven't. So one thing, up on the north part of it, there is an increased drive width, so the store has been moved forward a little bit towards West Main because we needed to make additional room for the trucks and cars to pass through and the drive-through lane. So the distance there moved a little bit. We've moved -- like I said, we've moved all outdoor seating to the back. We still do have additional -- a lot of bike racks, because that's a popular way of transportation, especially to get to these stores. So we have additional bike racks in the back as well, so those things are centralized in the rear. There's a -- because we don't have the car wash on the west side of the store anymore, we just have the drive-through, there's a little bit more room there, so we were able to open up the site plan a little. That truck parking and loading zone and the distance between where, you know, consumer traffic would travel and the diesel trucks is now widened, and we're not showing parking spaces there. So any conflicts that were in the prior site plan have been eliminated there or at least made much better. February 17, 2022 Page 12 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) And then no buffer changes around. All the distances and everything else have been changed. As Jeff said, no additional deviations or other changes to the site plan or conditions. All right. We know the zoning, it's a CPUD that was just approved. The reason -- really reason we're back here is that about three-quarters of the way through this process and probably within weeks of already having this Planning Commission meeting scheduled, 7-Eleven's working on prototypes of this drive-through in Texas and other places. They've had a number of them up and operating. They felt this was a great opportunity. We didn't have the eating places that allows drive-throughs on this schedule of uses, so -- but at that time we decided it was better to just finish the process that we were in instead of go back up and then come back in, because they weren't even completely sure this was the right place. But now, throughout their due diligence process, they decided it was, committed to it, and so we came back in with a PUDA. It was really to add the drive-through and the eating place. We had another neighborhood information meeting. Nobody showed up for that one, so we didn't have any input. I did go to the Immokalee CRA and re-present the changes, and they made a vote at that meeting to support the changes, so we did revisit with them. And we have no other express concerns, just excitement from the -- from the community to get this thing up and going. And Creighton Development is committed to -- we've had to actually delay the construction contracts a few times because of this, but now they're ready to get going. So with that, we believe it's consistent with the Growth Management Plan, consistent with the Immokalee Main Street Overlay Subdistrict and with the deviation previously approved supported by the Immokalee CRA, and we've had meetings, you know, with the Chamber of Commerce several times, and no public opposition. So I am here for questions if you have them. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Fred? MR. DROVLIC: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Are you able to tell us what food operations might be resident inside 7-Eleven and if not decided for this one, what brands will typically be inside other 7-Elevens? MR. DROVLIC: Yeah, I don't know if Laura Evans could say with full commitment. Now, other ones there have been -- Taco Laredo has been one that has been put inside there that would be the food service part of the drive-through. I'm not sure if we're -- MS. EVANS: That's correct. MR. DROVLIC: Yeah, so there's a commitment to the Taco Loredo at this location. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I think this might be for you, Mike. Could you refresh my memory wellfield risk on the discussion we had on this? Wasn't -- there was discussion on this property about a wellfield and the fuel pumps. I just don't recall it. MR. BOSI: Unfortunately, Commissioner, I started in June of 2021 back with the county. I wasn't here for that hearing. I do know that on a number of gas stations we've had wellfield risk. I'm not sure if there was one that was provided for -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: We talked about it at -- it was a topic of discussion. I just don't remember the outcome. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ms. Cook, did you want to speak to that? MS. COOK: Jaime Cook, your director of development review. I do not believe this is the same property. So the discussion that we had previously about a gas station is not this same property. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. February 17, 2022 Page 13 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) MS. COOK: So there is no wellfield protection over this area. COMMISSIONER SHEA: It's not in a wellfield risk area? MS. COOK: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: Within the development commitments related to pollution control, we do have some -- we have three individual commitments related to pollution control that I think that has a relationship to proximity to some residential properties that may be within the watershed. So there have -- there was some discussion, and Pollution Control had suggested some additional protections for the facility within the PUD. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. I have a few -- oh, Commissioner Vernon, go ahead, sir. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. Just kind of -- I guess it's been a long time since we saw this before. So can you go back to Slide 6. It was up there just before Mike put that up there. Do you see where the bike racks are? MR. DROVLIC: Yes. OPPOSING COUNSEL: On the ingress and egress, that's from the street, right? Right next to it. MR. DROVLIC: Oh, on the bike rack -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: The top right-hand corner on the left. I was just wondering about safety issues. And where exactly are the bike racks? MR. DROVLIC: Oh, I do see there's -- I actually missed one in the front. So there's one on the southeast corner near where the walkway painted stripes that connect to the sidewalk on North 9th. So there's one small one up front, and then there's two in the back. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Okay. Yeah. MR. DROVLIC: South. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'm getting help -- MR. DROVLIC: Northeast and southeast. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yep. I didn't see the arrow. It just looked like the bike rack's right there with cars coming in. MR. DROVLIC: Oh, gotcha. In the middle of the -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: I thought there was outdoor seating. COMMISSIONER VERNON: It didn't feel right to me. MR. DROVLIC: I'm going to have the engineer come up and explain why we did that. COMMISSIONER VERNON: The bikes are protecting the patrons. And then what's on the other side where we are? If you just go to the next property over where the dumpster and the outdoor eating is, bike rack, what's behind there? MR. DROVLIC: Dumpster and outdoor seating. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Same -- what's on the other side of that property? CHAIRMAN FRYER: You mean north? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, I didn't know whether this was north/south orientation. So the north of this. MR. DROVLIC: It is. So it would be the north and the west. So the north is residential property and a house. That is the reason for the extended buffer and the wall. To the west, and it continues north, is the four acres that were previously part of this overall development. I think I can show -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: No, that's fine. MR. DROVLIC: Yeah, there it is. So a little bit of the north -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: I wanted to get a flavor for that. MR. DROVLIC: -- is the existing four-acre -- the four-acre parcel, and then the northeast portion is a residential property. So in this area here is a residential home, and then this four acres February 17, 2022 Page 14 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) to the east and north is part of the -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. None of those folks are lodging objections to this? MR. DROVLIC: They are not, no. A while ago we had a call from the resident to the north, and she just asked, is it an 8-foot wall. What's the distance. And then she said, "Great, sounds good." COMMISSIONER VERNON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Mr. Eastman? MR. EASTMAN: Will you allow alcohol to be served through the driver-through, or is it strictly food and nonalcoholic beverages? MR. DROVLIC: I don't know. A margarita sounds good but not great for maybe driving around with. So I don't know about that. No. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I was going to ask the very same question. It's a good one. MR. EASTMAN: I have an additional -- MR. DROVLIC: No. MR. EASTMAN: Good. I have an additional question. MR. DROVLIC: No, not the drive-through. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So that can be made a condition of our approval? MS. EVANS: I don't see why not. MR. DROVLIC: Yeah, yeah. I think so. Yes. Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay, thank you. Okay. MR. EASTMAN: My next question relates to noise, like a PA system Order No. 16 ready or music over loudspeakers. We've had some citizen complaints about those at different projects in the past. Are you going to have a PA system or music piped over loudspeakers to the outdoor dining area? MR. DROVLIC: Yeah, I don't know the answer to that. So you're not asking specifically about the drive-through part, or you're just asking about outdoor music? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Probably both. MR. EASTMAN: Obviously, you need something for the drive-through, right, but that's relatively low and -- MR. DROVLIC: Yeah. MR. EASTMAN: -- every order or whatever. But I'm talking about maybe constant music or loud music to -- atmosphere-related stuff to the outdoor dining area, something like that, or announcing orders for pickup or something from the outdoor seating to people that come in that neighbors might find a nuisance or annoying. MR. DROVLIC: All right. We'll get an answer for that one. I don't know. MR. WRIGHT: My understanding is that the drive-through is separate from the outdoor music. The drive-through's going to have a buffer and a lot of room between any residential. The outdoor music, we have no plans at this point that I'm aware of to pipe any outdoor music there and, you know, if the Commission wants to place a condition to that effect, we would be -- we would be agreeable to it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. And for the record, that was Mr. Jeff Wright speaking. MR. WRIGHT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It seems to me that's a good condition to be in there for this. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes. MR. WRIGHT: One other related thought on that is that either way we'll comply with the county's noise ordinance, and we're happy to put that as a condition in there. MR. KLATZKOW: You don't need a condition that you're going to comply with local ordinance, Jeff. MR. WRIGHT: I know. We're happy to add one, but I know we don't need one. February 17, 2022 Page 15 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: What is that, 65 decibels? It's pretty loud, whatever it is. Okay. No one else is signaling. I've got just a few here that I'd like to raise. Okay. SIC Code 5812 -- and almost all of those that you're asking for make sense. There are a few that I really don't think you want, and I'd like -- if my expectation is correct, I'd like to have these deleted. Under 5812 SIC code you have caterers and industrial and institutional food service establishments. I would take it you would be okay removing that? MR. DROVLIC: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. And then to the same effect is 5812, 9905, which is commissary, restaurant and -- excuse me, 9905, and then 9906, which is contract food services; you're not interested in doing either of those either, correct? MR. DROVLIC: No. No. Those two are fine. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Let me see if I have anything else. No one showed up at the NIM, so, I mean, no harm was done by this, and certainly it's an immaterial -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- number of increased p.m. peak-hour trips, but at the NIM you would have presented to the public, if the public had shown up, that you wanted seven additional trips per hour and now coming to us wanting 10, and that's -- I don't consider that material, but would you care to offer an explanation as to what happened between when those materials were presented versus now? MR. DROVLIC: Yeah, there was just a slight at -- so they originally ran the TIS on maybe, like, 5,100 feet. We rounded it to 5,250 just because the development program was coming out really close to that number, and we didn't want to get -- hit a ceiling, go in with a Site Development Plan that was at 5,101 and have an issue. So in between there, we rounded up, readjusted the traffic study, and that's where the additional trips came from. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Any other planning commissioners have comments at this time? Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik, go ahead, sir. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Sure. Okay. So I'm just trying to figure out, you were -- Mr. Chairman, you seemed to be wanting to limit the approved uses? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: You were walking him through things that he wasn't planning to do. Is that because you're planning to delete those from the authorized uses that are -- that we vote on? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. I guess I'm just trying to figure out, I mean, owners, you know, when they come before us, I don't know why we would limit if we're picking a zoning, unless there's a good reason to, because we want owners to have the flexibility to use their property in a way that's fitting with the zoning that we approve and, obviously, we can always, you know, evaluate, you know, what we're recommending for approval. But what is the reason to -- you know, to hinder the flexibility of the owner? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I don't see -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And I would say, if the owner has -- you know, doesn't care, that's fine, but I think it's a discussion worth having. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, all right. That's a good point. Let me explain. This has been a concern of long standing for me that I think -- and I'm not singling out this applicant or these agents, but we have people coming before us who really don't look very carefully at the SIC codes that they're asking for, and many times there are -- there are permitted uses in those SIC codes that go far beyond what they're intending, and they can always come back later. If they decide that they want to start up a caterer or an industrial and institution food service, they can come back. But, I mean, that is a very significant difference from the 7-Eleven. February 17, 2022 Page 16 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) And so I like to right-size the permitted uses to match what the present intentions and reasonable future expectations are of an applicant. And so that's why I did this today and why I have done it many times in the past and will continue to do so. And I think, and I won't put words in the applicant's mouth, but I don't think the applicant objects to my request; is that correct? MR. DROVLIC: I don't. I agree that -- I would look at overall -- I'd view these things is that SIC code, overall, compatible with the area. If we did come back with that, would it likely be approved? And then if it would, then what's the harm in allowing it now? So we know the intention of this property. We know how it's going to be built. So in that way, I don't want to make more trouble than necessary. But as a consultant in general fighting for the client, I would -- I would argue with that more normally if this wasn't such a definitive development program. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well -- and it is a definitive one, and nobody showed up at the NIM, and quite possibly it's because they understood that this was a 7-Eleven where they're going to swap out car wash and swap in the window service. And so, you know, if that's all that it is to them and to us, I think it's a great idea, and it makes sense that you are adapting to a different view of changed circumstances in that marketplace. MR. DROVLIC: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I just want to be sure that we confine ourselves to what really would be consistent with what the -- what the expectations of the neighbors would be. And I think these large institutional areas -- first of all, there's nothing that you guys intend to do now, and if someone intended to do it later on, they should, I think, come back for a rezone and have another NIM and see what the neighbors had to say. MR. DROVLIC: I don't normally side completely with removing a use, but in this case I would -- I think there's value there because a lot of this was -- in order to get this automobile separation waiver approved in the first place from the Handy Store next door, in order for the CRA to feel really good about this project, it was that it was serving the pedestrian population there, that it was going to be -- it's needed, it's needed for the diesel services. There's a lot of reasons, specifically to this site, that it was favorably looked upon by the community that an industrial caterer would not be because it's not serving anybody except other businesses and companies. So -- and this way that's why I'm willing to say I agree and that use is fine. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. I appreciate your statements and the reasonableness that is behind it. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, sir. Yes, Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Oh, I just was -- I appreciate that discussion, and I'm fine. You know, I have no problem now -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- having heard that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, sir. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I just want to follow up with Robb's statement. I want to, for the record, make it clear we have routinely reviewed SIC code uses and eliminated individual uses from the laundry list of SIC codes in reviewing land petitions, and this is not unusual. And I thank the Chairman for diligently reviewing the list, because I didn't pick any of those out, and I thank you. That's routinely done by the Planning Commission. So, Robb, just understand that we have routinely in the past eliminated specific uses from the laundry list of SIC code items on straight zoning. February 17, 2022 Page 17 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yeah, no. I appreciate that very much, and I -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I appreciate that very much, and I would just say that it wasn't clear to me, you know, if the petitioner -- you know, what the petitioner view on that was, and I think that in this case it seems as though there's no concern on anyone's part, and it would be good to, you know, to pull those out, you know, and take them off the list. So I appreciate what you're saying, and that pattern and practice of our commission to look into those things, so thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Commissioner Klucik, and thank you, Commissioner Schmitt. And now I'll call on Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Actually, Joe answered my question. I was going to ask Jeff, because I never really thought about it. But I think, you know, based on what the Chairman said, and apparently we've done it this way historically, you know, if somebody comes to us and has a NIM and says we're going to do this with it, I don't -- I think the proper protocol is to approve that thing that they want to do, not to approve a laundry list of stuff that they may change their minds and do something later without a NIM. So I agree with you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Commissioner. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Actually, I wanted to follow up with Joe as more of an educational on the SIC codes. We use them a lot. I understand what they are. Are we -- do we have our own that we adopt, or do we adopt a national or a state group of SIC codes? Because it sounds like it must be local, because we are changing them. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We adopt a national SIC codes, a laundry list. Go ahead, Jeff. MR. KLATZKOW: Okay. In straight zoning, you've have got a laundry list of activities, okay, and they're tied to SIC codes. In a PUD, the concept about a PUD is that it's a -- it's not an off-the-rack zoning. It's a tailormade zoning, all right, and as a tailormade zoning if there are certain uses that you don't think it's appropriate for this area. It might impact the neighbors, traffic, whatever. It is your prerogative to cut it down. If they were looking for, like, straight zoning, we just want everything C-3 -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. MR. KLATZKOW: -- it might be a different discussion. But, again, this is a PUD. PUDs are tailormade to the property, and you're well within your parameters to cut it down. COMMISSIONER VERNON: That's super helpful. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Vice Chair Homiak. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We used to get the SIC codes books. I think some of us still have -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I have them. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's also on the Internet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's on the Internet. It's a standard SIC code and the listing. MR. KLATZKOW: And they are out of date. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: They're out of date, yeah, they are. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Exhibit A, on your principal uses, A3 where it's the SIC code, it should be 5411 for grocery stores, not food service and not the 4511.02. It should be grocery stores and 5411 in parentheses. MR. WRIGHT: I'm looking at the proposed ordinance, the list of uses. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think so, as Vice Chair Homiak -- it's A3. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Three? MR. WRIGHT: For the record, Jeff Wright. I do see food stores, Group 5111.02, and I February 17, 2022 Page 18 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) was just pulling it up as you were talking. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: SIC code is 5411 for grocery stores. There's no -- I don't see a food store. It's not listed in the SIC code as food stores. It's grocery stores. MR. WRIGHT: And I had 5812 up. Just a second here. I want to look that up. I think 5411 -- I have the SIC code access. 5411 is the general category for grocery stores, and we're fine -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: What is Subcategory 02, just for curiosity's sake? MR. WRIGHT: I'm looking it up here. MR. BOSI: Chair, that's listed as snack products. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. WRIGHT: And we're fine. If staff is fine, we could either have it the way it is, 5111.02 with the snack products, or just 5411, which is a broader category that would include the grocery. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Well, you're having -- it says you're a 5,250-square-foot food store. So is it a -- you're having -- it's a grocery store or -- MR. WRIGHT: Well, there's one principal structure, and it's the convenience store. It's labeled as a food store. And, really, this actually came up late in our preparation here today. And I asked, why do we have food stores on there? And the reason we have food stores is first of all Immokalee's a fairly unique community, and you might have some fruit or something like that that you need to sell, but it was really just to make sure we covered everything so we didn't have to do this again. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: That would be grocery store. MR. WRIGHT: 5411? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. MR. WRIGHT: Well, I'm not sure if staff has a recommendation for us to -- MR. BOSI: Let me provide a little clarification. The six digit is not normally customized or utilized -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Don't use. MR. BOSI: -- within our PUDs. 5411, when you go to the SIC code lookup, when they give examples of 5411, 7-Eleven comes up. I would suggest the Planning Commission recommend, to simplify, food stores, 5411. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is the applicant okay with that? Gives you more latitude. MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And you're going to be selling bread, milk, other daily-use items. It should be a grocery store. It's a small convenience store, but it's 5411. MR. WRIGHT: We're okay with that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good point. MR. WRIGHT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: And No. 2, the 6,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure, are you -- are you having another 6,000 square feet over the 52-? MR. WRIGHT: No. And I see that -- I believe what you're pointing out there is that in the paragraph immediately above A -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. MR. WRIGHT: -- there is a specific square footage cap of 5,250, and then in A2 it says, eating places with drive-through with 6,000 square feet or less, so there's two caps there. I believe that's what you're referring to -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. MR. WRIGHT: -- the discrepancy between those two numbers. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yes. MR. WRIGHT: Okay. I think. February 17, 2022 Page 19 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Well, the first one is for food store and eating place/drive-through. So why would you have the 6,000? MR. DROVLIC: The 6,000 is straight from the SIC code description that that's the category of -- 5812 is described as convenience -- eating places under 6,000 square feet. There's a different SIC code for eating places that are larger than 6,000 square feet. So that's just -- that's just the SIC code. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: You should leave that out. MR. DROVLIC: If it's confusing, sure, but that was just a specification of what the SIC code limited. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would agree. I would strike that out. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: It sounds like it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The restriction is 5,250 and just say eating place with drive-through, 5812, and then strike through the rest of the sentence, because the 6,000 has nothing to do with the zoning. I mean, you're limited already to 5,250. MR. WRIGHT: I agree with that change. It removes that ambiguity. We're okay with that change. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Staff good with that? MR. BELLOWS: Yeah, we're good with that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: That's it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Anything else from the applicant? MR. DROVLIC: I do have one other thing, so -- and this is just a thought for the future and a consideration possibly by you and by staff. As the market is changing, the convenience store with a drive-through may become more and more common. We -- when this came up for us to have to -- for it to be such a similar use to convenience store as far as traffic trips, even impact, especially with the car wash that was there as far as noise and everything, I think it would be a good consideration to allow drive-throughs with convenience stores for them to be considered as one thing as convenience stores move forward instead of having to add eating places. That was really the only reason we had to go back through this rezoning. So the drive-through was either a permitted use separately, or it was already considered part of convenience store. We would have been considering that all at the original zoning request and wouldn't need to have it come back through here. So it's just a consideration for the future. In this way, we'll look at it as an oversight on our part to maybe not have that -- eating places on there in the first place for flexibility, but that was surprising to me, working in other jurisdictions that either has drive-through as separate use or it's considered as part of several uses such as a convenience store, fast-food restaurants, et cetera. Just a thought for consideration. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: As a relevant example to that question, I think drugstores might -- they have evolved over time to have drive-throughs whereas they didn't -- I don't think they did a long time ago. So is there any correlation there? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. The Land Development Code doesn't specifically have a prohibition on drive-throughs for those kinds of uses, and that's why you see them throughout the county. But when there is a zoning overlay, such as in this case, or the CRA has some additional restrictions, then that's why this PUD was limited when it was first approved, and that's why they're back in to make the change, not because the LDC restricted it. It's because of the overlay. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything else for the applicant? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, thank you very much. We'll hear from staff. February 17, 2022 Page 20 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) MR. DROVLIC: All right, thank you. MR. BELLOWS: That's me. Again, Ray. I've reviewed this project with our contract employee, Laura DeJohn. We found it consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The changes were deemed relatively minor in regard to changes in trip rates. And the proposed tweaks and modifications, I am fully on board, and thank you for picking out some of those SIC code issues. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Any questions from the Planning Commission for staff; questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, thank you very much. Mr. Youngblood, do we have any speakers? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, I don't have any registered speakers for this item. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Anyone who is present in this room wish to be heard on this matter, now would be the time. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Seeing none, we will close the public comment portion of this hearing and undertake our deliberations. Who would like to start? COMMISSIONER FRY: Would you entertain a motion? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Of course. COMMISSIONER FRY: I'd like to move for approval of this item with -- and I'll try to list the conditions as I think we listed them. Conditions: No outdoor music or PA system other than the PA for the drive-through; no alcohol sold through the drive-through; removing the SIC codes that you stipulated and, perhaps, you'd like to clarify those; I think we had a slight variation of the SIC codes to 5411 and 5812. And we removed -- removing the reference to 6,000 square feet or less. I believe that was in the approved uses section. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let me just try to clarify the rather modest changes to the SIC code. We will be deleting caterers and industrial and institutional food service establishments, and we will be deleting commissary restaurants and contract food services. Any further discussion on the motion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's been made and seconded. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I concur and second as proposed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That was an affirmative time delay, I'm sure. It passes 7 to nothing. Thank you, applicant. Thank you, Planning Commission. Thank you, staff. And that concludes our zoning matters today. And let's see if -- we probably can get out of here by 10:30, but if not, we'll have a break then. But I think we'll probably be able to get out of here by 10:30. February 17, 2022 Page 21 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) Let's see. We go to -- well, I'm having trouble here. Old business. And what I'd like to talk about here, very briefly, and I think others -- well, Mr. Bosi weighed in on it, and we've had conversations about this before, and that has to do with the presence -- the desirability of there being a member of the Planning Commission on the Affordable Housing Advisory Board. And I know Commissioner Schmitt was on it for a long time, and having a representative like that, I think, is very useful to us. Frankly, I think it's extremely useful to the affordable housing group because we can actually do something about it. When we hear what their concerns are, we can act upon them when real live matters come before us. So from my perspective, I would -- I would like to see the action taken, whether it's by the staff, whether we as a Planning Commission communicate directly with the BCC in some form or fashion, to ask that a member of the Planning Commission be seated on the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee and, fortunately, we've got one of our environmental commissioners, Commissioner Paul Shea, who is willing to do it, and I think it would be extremely useful for us because it's a subject of critical importance to everything we do. And as I mentioned earlier, affordable housing is something that, you know, that we have the ability to take action on and can implement ideas that might come from the ingenuity or creativity from the Affordable Housing Committee that Commissioner Shea, if he were on that group, could report to us and give us the benefit of their thinking. Also, I looked at the -- on the county website, and I noticed that the -- there are 11 slots on the Affordable Housing Committee, and there are 11 categories. Now, it doesn't say that there has to be one of each category. It's sort of implied that there does, but it doesn't expressly say. And one of those categories is a member of the local planning agencies. Well, we're the local planning agency, and Commissioner Shea is a member. And so there are either two or three openings on the Affordable Housing Committee coming up in October of this year. That will be one way of dealing with it if the BCC or the Affordable Housing Committee were disposed to follow our request, or we could maybe ask that the number be increased to 12 so that we could get Commissioner Shea on there. So I'm just throwing that out as an idea and would like to hear some other Planning Commissioners what they think of that. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I think there's an opening now. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Do you? COMMISSIONER SHEA: There's an opening now, but I don't fit into the 11 categories, the one position that they're looking for. MR. KLATZKOW: If one of you wants to sit on the -- on this committee, there's a seat that's open. Make a nomination, and I'll process it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. There's always been a member -- prior to me, it was Mark Strain for several years. I served on it for almost three years. And there is a -- as you stated, there is a seat for the planning -- one Planning Commission member to advise the affordable housing staff on planning procedures. There's also staff members there as well, so -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- it's just a matter of Paul being nominated or volunteering and submitting his name. Jeff will prepare a document. It goes to the Board for approval. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon. MR. KLATZKOW: Make a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Make a motion that Paul be our representative on the Affordable Housing Committee. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'll second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? Is that in the proper form? MR. KLATZKOW: I will process it. All you have to do is say yes. February 17, 2022 Page 22 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just a little background. The head of our in-house -- head of that group is supposedly talking to the Chair of the Commissioners for the next meeting to add somebody from the planning. So you might talk to him; see how far he's progressed with that. MR. KLATZKOW: I couldn't care less. I've got an open seat that's for the Planning Commission, and you guys want to be on it. You'll be on it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's always been an open spot. MR. KLATZKOW: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Let's vote. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Thank you, Paul. CHAIRMAN FRYER: The question has been moved. Let's have a vote. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you very much. I don't have anything further, but -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have two issues. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: One issue, I just want to bring up and forewarn our fellow commissioners, I'm pretty sure all of you have been receiving emails about the Isles of Capri rezoning. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Gulf Bay. I think it's Gulf Bay. It's under Gulf Bay Properties or -- I am not answering any of those emails. I don't intend to. I believe Sue Faulkner has been -- started to answer them, and I understand that that petition we probably will not even see it till sometime in the fall. So I just want to make sure my fellow planning commissioners understand, though they are interesting reading, I'm not responding. And it's certainly going to have some fun when it comes forward for us to review. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you for bringing that up. Of course, we have been getting those, and I -- I've created a subfolder, and I just move them over to that subfolder so I'll have them when the time comes, and I'll look at them. I'm not looking at them now either. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Exactly what I do as well. I have a subfolder. On the second issue, regrettably, I missed the presentation when we did the flood maps demonstration. I can't remember the program. MR. BOSI: ACUNE. COMMISSIONER SHEA: ACUNE. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What is it? MR. BOSI: ACUNE. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The ACUNE model. Where is that going now, and what is happening with that? I saw something on the local news. Everybody's talking about imminent danger of flooding in Naples, and we're all going to be underwater within three-and-a-half weeks, and so I'm just curious as to where we're going with this. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I missed that one. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm being facetious, maybe. Is that going to the Board February 17, 2022 Page 23 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) for approval, use as a planning tool, or what's going on with that? MR. BOSI: I believe on the April -- on look-ahead, I believe if you look at the April -- the look-ahead that shows the petitions that are coming forward to the Board of County -- or the Planning Commission, if you look at the April 7th, you'll see the -- that's not on it. It's probably the next one -- where the CCME is going to come back, the modifications to the CCME about the resiliency and developing a resiliency plan from a local level. The Board of County Commissioners is being approached to utilize the ACUNE as one of the modeling tools that we will utilize to identify low-lying areas within the county that we have to focus our resiliency efforts towards trying to identify where the most flood-prone and most vulnerable areas are within the county. So you'll be hearing an item that's directly tied to the ACUNE model as an additional planning tool to -- staff to utilize as we move forward with resiliency planning. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Eastman. MR. EASTMAN: With respect to the emails that we've been getting and specifically the Isles of Capri, sometimes it includes all the planning commissioners, and I don't worry about that. I just assume that that's going to become part of the public record. Sometimes they're individually addressed at just me. And so I'm wondering, I would like that to become part of public record. Should I forward that to a staff member? Should I forward that to Ray? How can I, you know, make that part of the public record? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: If it was sent to your -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: It is already. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- county email, it's already part of public record. MR. EASTMAN: Okay, good. That's great. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is it coming to your school district or your -- MR. EASTMAN: It must be coming to my school district, yeah, and in that case, then, can I just forward it to Mike or Ray? MR. BOSI: Yes. MR. EASTMAN: Okay, okay. MR. BOSI: And we'll get it to either -- Sue Faulkner is the GMP coordinator and Nancy Gundlach is the zoning coordinator as well, so we'll forward it to the appropriate -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. BOSI: -- staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, I just -- you know, I think it's up to every commissioner how they handle their situation. But since Joe brought it up, I never respond to any email that I get ever, because I don't think it's fair to respond to some people and not others, number one, and, number two, it's a very slippery slope. Once you begin to go back and forth, then where do you stop? So I try to read what I can. A lot of them are very repetitive, but I do try to read what I can, and I never respond, and that way I treat everybody the same. MR. KLATZKOW: Unless you guys want to write down what you're saying and then during the ex parte repeat that, it is a terrible idea to be responding. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I agree. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I just read them. That's it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I never respond either. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I don't either. CHAIRMAN FRYER: For the very same reason. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I don't think any of us do. MR. EASTMAN: No. MR. BOSI: And I would think, Commissioner Fryer -- and I imagine all the other planning commissioners have the same process where you put it in a separate folder. All these February 17, 2022 Page 24 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) correspondence that we receive from the public related to the petitions that you're -- are going to be heard will be provided to you from staff as well with the package that gives you the full staff assessment, gives you all the background documentation. Trying to respond to an individual email without even having the background and the data and the analysis so you can provide -- like you said, I think Jeff put it eloquently, it's a horrible idea. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: We had one case where we had several thousand emails. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon, do you want -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. I was going to switch gears. Do you want -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go right ahead, sir. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I just want to let everybody know, my fellow commissioners know that I made a presentation about -- at the first part of the Leadership Collier Growth Management Day that they had, and Jamie French was there and actually helped with the presentation, so I just want to let everybody know I did that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. I'm glad you did it. No one is signaling now. Mr. Bosi, were you going to talk about the portal? MR. BOSI: Oh, no. One of the questions that were raised to staff was related to the county's web page changes as well as some -- some increased capability of the county's portal in terms of how it can be searched, how it can be utilized, and the Chair had asked for a presentation on that. What I wanted to talk with the Planning Commission, is that something that you would like within a future hearing, or would that be something that you would just want to reach out? And we can reach out to each individual if you wanted to have us schedule a 101 with our trainers to kind of give you a run-through and overview and answer your questions on an individual basis. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let me augment that, if I may. Thank you, Mr. Bosi. I had gotten an email from a staff person by the name of Perryman, and she, I think, thought that I was a supervisory staff member, and she asked if I wanted her to make a presentation to my people. My people, which I have none of. But then I thought, you know, I've been working with this new portal trying to get around it, and I'm having some difficulty. For instance, CityView is much more difficult to get to, and -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I get right into CityView. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Under the new portal? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Well, here's the -- here's the question. So I responded -- I responded to this lady who emailed me and I said, if you have a five- or 10-minute PowerPoint presentation to just acquaint the Planning Commission members with the changes in the portal, it might be useful. But Mr. Bosi makes a good point. If we don't need it, we don't need it. So it's -- what do you all -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, Mr. Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I was just going to say that, you know, I wouldn't mind being considered, you know, being associated with you as one of your people, but I think you'd probably decline that honor. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'd be proud to have you as my people. But first, I'm going to have to have my people talk to your people. COMMISSIONER VERNON: You know, I guess if we had, like, a short agenda day -- I'm sorry. I jumped in before I was recognized. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER VERNON: If we had a short agenda day, I wouldn't mind a 10-minute presentation. It would help me. But, also, I think one of the complaints is that, and I think Commissioner Klucik's brought it up before, that it's difficult for the public to navigate. And so February 17, 2022 Page 25 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) we may have some suggestions to change it. If it's difficult for us to understand, then I think it's up to us, or it should be a good idea to push the county to make it easier so the public can access it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I agree with you. Does anyone not agree? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Then I think that's the feedback you were looking for, Mr. Bosi. Anybody else want to be heard? (No response.) MR. BOSI: For clarity, on a light agenda day -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. MR. BOSI: -- we'll bring back a presentation that -- now, is it the portal, or is it the -- because we made significant changes to all county web pages and how you navigate those web pages. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We're just interested in planning and zoning, growth management. MR. BOSI: So focus upon the web page changes related to Growth Management and then with the concentration upon utilization of the CityView portal. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, yeah, and maybe -- as Commissioner Schmitt said, maybe it is easy to find. I just haven't found the easy way into it yet. That's on me. MR. BOSI: When you go to the Planning and Zoning web page on your left-hand side, one of the highlighted areas is GMD portal, so it is pretty easy. CHAIRMAN FRYER: GMP [sic] portal is what it's called. MR. BOSI: GMD, Growth Management Division -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, yeah. MR. BOSI: -- portal. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, yeah. So that takes you -- that doesn't take you directly to CityView, or does it? MR. BOSI: It takes you to the portal and gets you into CityView. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. That's the place where I was having difficulty, but, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. But I have a hotlink saved on one of my, you know -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I do, too. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I save it, but you've got to have the -- no, you don't even need a file for that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Well, I have a hotlink as well, and that's how I get to it. But I just was wondering, maybe some people who don't have hotlinks are now having difficulty finding it. Mr. Schmitt -- excuse me. Mr. French. MR. FRENCH: Good morning, Commissioners. For the record, Jamie French. Very quickly, Diane Perryman is one of our trainers within our organization. And, typically, what happens is that she'll come along and she'll actually train clients, community members, and this is a free service that we do provide to the community. What I might recommend is that you -- if you'd like to have some individual time with us, we're happy to walk you through it. We've also provided a number of training videos that we've shot ourselves that actually walk you through step by step. So a general member of the public -- the goal here is is to make that public record access, that community communication, so to speak, so easy that you don't even need to pick up the phone to call us, because 96 percent of our business right now is pretty much online, so -- and we're going through a conversion process to where we're actually taking a period of time and looking back, and we're converting everything over to a digital profile so that you don't even have to come into the office to access these records. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Anything further on this or anything else? February 17, 2022 Page 26 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I can get it right here on my phone. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You can? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, then, it's -- all right. Well, I'm going to go back to kindergarten, and then I'll report to you how that worked out. Any other old business or new business at this point? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any member of the public who wishes to be heard on matters that were not on the agenda, now would be the time. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Seeing none, we stand adjourned. Thank you. ******* There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:24 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION __________________________________________ EDWIN FRYER, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on __________, as presented _________ or as corrected _________. TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC., BY TERRI L. LEWIS, RPR, FPR-C, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. February 17, 2022 Page 27 of 27 5.A.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 02-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida March 17, 2022 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Edwin Fryer, Chairman Karen Homiak, Vice Chair Joe Schmitt Paul Shea Robert L. Klucik, Jr. Christopher T. Vernon (remotely) ABSENT: Karl Fry Tom Eastman, Collier County School Board Representative ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Page 1 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) P R O C E E D I N G S MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mike. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to this, the March 17, 2022, meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. Would everyone please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Before we begin, I'm going to ask staff if we've heard from Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER SHEA: He's still trying to -- he just texted me. He's still trying, but he said go ahead and start, and he'll chime in when he's in. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. He has what I think would be considered extraordinary circumstances. He's ill. And so if he wants to dial in, my recommendation would be that we allow for that. And we can dispense with that item, really, right now. Is there a motion? COMMISSIONER SHEA: So moved. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I make a motion to allow to dial in. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor of allowing Commissioner Vernon to dial in and participate remotely on account of illness, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. Commissioner -- Secretary Fry has an excused absence, so I'll call the roll. Mr. Eastman, who also has an excused absence for medical reasons. Mr. Shea? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Vernon? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Fry? Excused absence. Vice Chair Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Present. And I do have a question before we begin, after you do the roll. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Good. We have one, two, three, four, five. Did I count right? Yeah. Five and possibly six, so we have a quorum. Go ahead, Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I just want to confirm, especially because I can't log in yet for the Internet, is the packet -- the agenda packet that was published a few days ago, like, four or five days ago on the Internet, is that still an accurate agenda? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think there's one change, isn't there? MR. BOSI: It's an accurate agenda, but we are going to propose a modification to the Page 2 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) agenda this morning. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Procedural. MR. BOSI: Yeah, procedural. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Okay. All right. So that does take us to agenda addenda, and Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. We're going to move agenda Items 9.4 and 9.5 to the top of the public hearing agenda items today. That's dealing with the Golden Gate Golf Course. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You're going to ask us to do that? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's what I thought you meant. MR. BELLOWS: That's what I -- and you were also going to entertain allowing a public speaker to go first. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Okay, thank you. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Why do you want to do that? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's my question as well. What's driving that change? MR. BOSI: The Board of -- certain Board of County Commissioners is concerned about how long the golf course has taken to get to public hearing associated with the affordable housing commitments and the BigShots -- MR. KLATZKOW: We need to get this done because a couple deals may fall apart if we don't. MR. BOSI: Yes. And so they urged us to put it at the front of the meeting so we can take action on it today so we can make the April 26th Board of County Commissioners meeting. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But does that -- is there some kind of concern that they don't think we're going to get through this agenda today? Is that -- MR. BOSI: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I mean, I'm fine with the change. I just find it somewhat -- MR. BOSI: Yes. They're concerned that maybe if it's at the end of the agenda, that we wouldn't have time to -- if it runs longer than what we would expect. So the request was to put it to the front of the agenda so we can take action on it. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Did I heard the word "big shots"? MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. I just suggest we don't take any action based on anything asked by big shots. MR. KLATZKOW: No, that's not -- gentlemen, that's not the issue here. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, I understand. MR. KLATZKOW: We've got affordable housing commitments that could fall apart. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, I understand. And my point is simply that I don't want anyone -- you know, that we serve the public, and I don't want the public to think that we're making our decision because big shots asked us to. MR. KLATZKOW: No, this has nothing to do with BigShots, is my understanding. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. All right. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further comments before we -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: The only -- I'm just concerned a lot of people came here based on the agenda, and they're sitting in the audience, and now all of a sudden, we're going to switch the agenda around. I don't know how much -- Page 3 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's always a concern, and that's why I'm going to find out who's here for what now. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I also want to say that Mr. Bosi, I don't think, makes his decisions based on what big shots say to him. So I don't -- I understand that that wasn't your intent, but... CHAIRMAN FRYER: As far as I'm concerned, we're the big shots here. And now I'd like to ask, how many people are here publicly to speak on the Golden Gate Golf Course matter, please raise your hand. Okay. Is there anybody dialing in? No. So we've got one person for that. How many people are here for the -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Two dialing in. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Two dialing in. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Two dialing in, okay. Thank you. So we've got a total of three. How many people are here for Siena Lakes? Two. How many are here for Sabal Palm? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: None. Okay. And the EAR-based amendments, how many are here for that? One. All right. Okay. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, go ahead. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I suggest that any items for which we actually have people here in the room, that we take those at least in the order that they were on the agenda and don't prioritize anything before those. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think that that is -- certainly could be the desire of the Planning Commission. I don't oppose doing that. But what we're asking the members of the public who are here -- and I can't estimate at this point how long Golden Gate Golf Course is going to take or how short we'll get through it, but in any event the change has been requested. We haven't voted on the agenda change yet, but without objection from the Planning Commission, we will ask any public speakers who are here and who wish to have their three minutes or a little longer in the case of organizational representatives, if they want to be heard before that agenda item is called so that they don't need to sit through the Golden Gate, we will allow for that. Is there any objection to that procedure? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Apparently not. All right. And so I know Dr. Hushon is here on behalf of the League of Women Voters and wants to -- she's already indicated that she wants to be heard before we go into the main agenda, and so we're going to hear from her now at this time. But we're not going to continue with that matter until we come to it on the agenda. The Chair recognizes Dr. Hushon. DR. HUSHON: Judith Hushon representing the League of Women Voters of Collier County. And I want to speak to 1A, and I want to commend the county for doing a good job at turning this around. They listened to some recommendations that we gave to them for a language change, and it looks like it makes sense now. We do have a tool that we can use. This is the ACUNE tool for sea level rise and for storm surge, and you-all saw that in your presentation in October, I believe it was. So that tool is -- we have since that time educated about 15 to 20 people in the county, in the City of Naples, and the City of Marco Island to use that tool so it's in greater use than it was. And I want to congratulate you on that. And item -- you do have an option in Policy 14.1.6 where it says, the county shall Page 4 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) coordinate with local municipalities regarding sea level rise adaptation and mitigation measures. There is, actually, afoot a southwest compact, and Collier has been approached to be a member of it, as have Lee County, Charlotte County, City of Sarasota, City of Naples, Marco Island, Everglades City, Bonita Springs, all of these jurisdictions that are within the southwest part of Florida. The goal of this would be to coordinate any actions that are taken to combat sea level rise and storm surge and make them uniform across the region. We're all affected just about to the same extent. We're different from the East Coast. What -- the sea level rise is a different phenomena on the East Coast. It's happening a little faster because the East Coast is sinking, and they have different water, different water patterns. So they have a different set of issues than we do on the Gulf Coast. So we'd like to look at these issues as a group. So if one wanted to put in the southeast compact here, one could do that, and it would make sense because that's a possibility. And you could say, coordinate with local municipalities under such organizations as the southeast compact. I mean, you could make it like that. You also -- that doesn't rule out going to other groups, meeting in other ways to talk about how you're going to deal with sea level rise. We've had the Army Corps of Engineers come in here and show us the metallic way of dealing with it, the heavy engineering way, and now they're back looking at a lighter engineering way, and maybe this is something we need to look at all up and down the coast together. MR. KLATZKOW: And with all due respect, I would definitely recommend against that, putting something like that in the Comp Plan. DR. HUSHON: Okay. I'm just saying it's a possibility. But I commend you on getting the ACUNE in the front part, because I think that is what we are using. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt, I think, may have a question. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Judy, just to let you know, those two areas I've addressed, and I'm going to ask staff about both the model and the language in dealing with the -- DR. HUSHON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- the group that's going to be formed to study it. But I think it would -- that would not be appropriate for me to ask you to comment on that because it's questions I have of staff. DR. HUSHON: Okay. But I did explain to you this morning -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. DR. HUSHON: -- that the model is -- we're using the sea level rise numbers from NOAA. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. DR. HUSHON: This is the accepted numbers at the moment. You may have read that there's some new reports out in 2022. They're releasing them one a month, and they will be upping or downing the numbers, adjusting the numbers, in light of what NOAA's new recommendations are in 2022 at the end -- probably in the fall of 2022. So just to know that that will be happening to reflect the latest science. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. The two witnesses who are here who wanted to speak about Siena Lakes, do you want to be heard now, or do you want to be heard when the matter is called? MR. SANTAGATA: Now. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please approach, and we'll swear you both in. The court reporter will swear you in. Please both raise your hands if you're going to speak now. Well, first of all, let's get you both sworn in. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) MR. SANTAGATA: I do. MR. GENTILE: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Page 5 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) Please then state your name and tell us what you want us to hear. MR. GENTILE: My name is Charles Gentile. I'm a resident of Lakeside of Naples. I've lived in this community for a little over five years now. There is an issue with regard to birds that migrate at dusk from the gulf to what I would refer to as a rookery. It's adjacent to the Greek Orthodox Church, St. Katherine's, on Orange Blossom. These birds are a source of amazement to the residents, certainly to me, as I can view them from my home. There is a project that's underway that's going to add more square footage and another building, and there is a threat to, I think -- and, again, I'm not an expert. But there is a threat to these birds in terms of how that project is going to be undertaken. Rumor has it -- and, again, I'm speaking to this. I don't know for sure -- that a portion of that lake is going to be filled in. I have no idea what the impact of that, if it were to take place, would be on the birds, but I know that the staff of the Environmental Department here in the county is going to address that, and I just wanted to make you all aware of that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Please identify yourself, sir, and let's hear from you. MR. SANTAGATA: Thank you. Michael Santagata, 2571 Citrus Lake Drive, a 32-year resident of the Lakeside community, and I'm also the president of the homeowners association. We have approximately 340 units there. We would like to endorse the avian study that Craig Brown from the county is recommending that it be completed and added prior to any type of -- any type of work that's performed there. As my colleague Charlie Gentile mentioned, it's a lake, and it's completely surrounded with trees and brush, and it's just amazing at night, the birds that flock in when the sun is going down. And Mr. Brown was kind enough to come up on a couple of occasions and identify two species, a little blue heron and a tricolored heron that are endangered by the State of Florida, that roost there every night. So we would appreciate it if you would take into consideration the recommendation that an avian study be done on this particular property before any work -- any type of foliage is removed or the lake is covered over. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. Appreciate your concerns and expressing the issues you raised concerning environmental. I'm not going to ask any questions now, but I do want to ask that the environmental consultant be prepared to discuss the issues whether this -- these are endangered or listed species and what consultation was involved with regards to U.S. Fish and Wildlife or with Florida Fish and Wildlife. So we'll need those particulars and specifics when we address this issue. So the petitioner there from Siena Lakes, yeah, you'll be able to address that. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I sit as the environmental consultant or chair as well so I'm well aware of the whole process being a former Army Corps guy. So I do want to hear from the consultant, the environmental consultant on their position on that. Thank you. MR. GENTILE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. All right. I think it's appropriate at this time, the Chair would entertain a motion to alter the agenda so that we hear Items 4 and 5 as 1 and 2. Is there a motion to that effect? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I make a motion to amend the agenda as recommended by staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. Page 6 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes. Okay. Is that Commissioner Vernon? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yes. MR. BELLOWS: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay, good. Thank you. So it passes 6-0. ***And we will now go to the revised first and second matters. They are -- they're companions. We've got PL20210001610, which is the Golden Gate Golf Course GMPA, and PL20210001047, which is the Golden Gate Golf Course MPUDZ. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Schmitt. I'm sorry, Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just, if I could remind staff, I'm still waiting for IT support, because I can't get logged in. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. What are we doing on that? Is Mr. Miller coming in? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: They're coming. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Good. All right. Without objection, we will hear and vote on these matters together, and we will take ex parte disclosures at this point starting with Commissioner Shea, please. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff material and site visit. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Vernon? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Meeting with staff; that's it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. In my case, meeting with staff and also with representatives of -- well, let's see. I guess I met with Mr. Arnold. Vice Chair? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Nothing for me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt, ex parte? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, nothing to report. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just -- I communicated with staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Arnold, you may proceed, sir. MR. ARNOLD: You might want to swear. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, we better do that, hadn't we? All please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. Thank you for reminding me. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Now you may proceed, sir. MR. ARNOLD: Good morning, Mr. Chairman and Planning Commission members. I'm Wayne Arnold. I'm here representing the applicant, which is both Collier County Government and the hotel parcel that's known as the Golden Gate Inn & Suites. Mr. Yovanovich is also here representing the hotel parcel, and you have several representatives here. I don't think Jeff Davidson's here, but the contract to be involved with the golf course conversion for Golden Gate was issued to Davidson Engineering, and we were then Page 7 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) subsequently contracted to assist in that endeavor, and I'm specifically here to help on the Growth Management Plan amendment and the PUD's zoning aspect of that case. So we have quite a few team members. We have Dave Closas, who's a project manager for Collier County Government here; Geoff Willig from the County Manager's Office is here; Jeff Davidson, of course; Mike Delate, our professional engineer who's working on the drainage aspect of the case; and then Jim Banks, who's the traffic engineer for the matter. I think most of you all are familiar with the acquisition that the county made several years ago. So we're bringing that in through the process to convert a portion of the golf course to allow for the golf course to remain and then to allow some other governmental facility uses, some community facility type uses, and commercial uses. I mentioned that the Golden Gate Inn & Suites Hotel is a component of this. There was a contractual obligation between the county and that property owner to include it in the zoning case, so we are bringing that in as part of the zoning, and it's also a portion of the Growth Management Plan amendment portion. So on the aerial here, there are two large stars. Those are the two parcels that are encumbered with our Growth Management Plan amendment. It's just a little over 20 acres. The statutory threshold for a small-scale amendment is now 50 acres or less, so we're within that threshold for a small-scale amendment. So that will track concurrent with the PUD rezoning. No need to transmit it separately to the state or no state review for that item. So, again, we're -- the Comp Plan amendment, we're right now designated Golden Gate urban -- Golden Gate City sub-element of the master plan for Golden Gate, and it's a mixed-use district. And right now it does not permit for the governmental services that we would propose nor does it recognize the hotel that's in existence today. The county was also deeded the small parcel. If you've been around long enough, it was the old JD Jags Restaurant building on Golden Gate Parkway. That building was deeded to the county, so it's also included in this. And so your Comp Plan change represents about 20.1 acres, and then the overall zoning case is for 171.6 acres. The request, of course, for the Comp Plan amendment is to acknowledge general governmental offices, and those would be things like Tax Collector offices, property appraiser, the functions that occur at Horseshoe Drive, et cetera, as well as community centers, libraries, parks, things of that nature. And then we've also -- the county owned a C-3 parcel of land located at the corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard. The hotel parcel is zoned RT, residential tourist, and that allows hotel, timeshare facilities, and we're also asking for that to allow C-3 commercial uses. And then the JD Jags building that I mentioned that you-all recently acquired through deed was -- or is zoned C-4. So all of those are going to be combined into a singular PUD. And we've established the PUD to have separate tract areas that will designate those and have separate uses and development standards for each. So, again, this is a map exhibit that's part of your Comp Plan that reflects the two areas that are part of the new subdistrict that we're creating. The golf course conversion process, this is the first project that's being brought through the process. So the county adopted those standards a few years ago, but it starts with an intent-to-convert application process, and that application process was initiated. There were two stakeholder outreach meetings that are required by code. Those have to be held in season, and they were. You had to present conceptual plans to them. You had to do participant surveys as part of that. And at the time, it wasn't known whether or not the county would retain the golf course, so it was presented as either going to be a park or a golf course, and I think the folks who live nearest in the Pars Condominiums clearly favored retaining a golf course. So the county has subsequently made the decision to pursue the golf course, and right now the 18-hole golf course will be converted to a 12-hole golf course, and a portion of it will be developed as a driving range entertainment complex. Those two uses are permitted by right under the existing golf course zoning and don't necessarily require the PUD rezoning, but we are going Page 8 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) through the process to include those for that use. So the county has made the decision to pursue the 12-hole golf course. They have contracts and leaseholds in place for those users, and they also have use agreements for the affordable housing component that I'll talk about shortly. So -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Where is the affordable housing component? MR. ARNOLD: I'll get to that in just one moment. I'm show you, Mr. Klucik. So after we finished the intent-to-convert process, we were allowed to submit for the PUD rezoning and the companion Growth Management Plan amendment. We've held our -- we've had three neighborhood informational meetings. We backtracked and held one after we added the hotel parcel, after we started. We've had moderate participation. I'd say there were about a dozen people in our last meeting in February that attended. I think, generally, it's favorable to the golf course and the overall project. Some concerns that are related to development in the county, and that is they're going to be six-laning Collier Boulevard and a portion of the golf course property; about 40 feet of it will be utilized for improvements to Collier Boulevard, and then there probably will be some bridge reworking for access into the Eastern Estates. And so there have been some members of the Estates who've participated over the course of the last year expressing interest in where the bridge would be located. So these were proposed plans that were submitted as part of the intent to convert and the stakeholder meeting outreach plans. They're a little hard to read in this context, but they showed either, you know, just open space, park system, or potential golf course. And, Mr. Klucik, the affordable housing component is on the left bottom part of the screen on these intent-to-convert plans. And in green are the proposed greenways that are between any portion of the plan converted from golf course to another use. And you can see that on the bottom, No. 3C, as it's labeled, shows the extent of the -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Excuse me. I'm just trying to orient where these pictures are on -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: The problem with this is is that north is not pointing up. MR. ARNOLD: Correct. North is to the right. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. That's what -- I thought I was a little disoriented. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's in the southeast corner. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. North to the right, so the affordable housing project is in the far southern extent of the PUD. It's adjacent to the canal and Collier Boulevard. CHAIRMAN FRYER: While we're on that, I think I speak for the rest of the Planning Commission that it -- would you please have the maps oriented with north up? It just -- it saves us a lot of time. MR. BOSI: And what I would say is that sometimes the map is oriented on the screen towards where it gets very limited towards the display, so that's why they alternate it so you can get a better understanding of everything that's going on, because if you orient -- if you orient it to the north, all of a sudden you've got a very narrow window. That's why they do it. It doesn't -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I also rotate them in my PDF reader. COMMISSIONER SHEA: A good example of that is the one right there. If you rotate that north, you're not going to be able to read it as well. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: The good news is is that my brain has now locked in. I get it. MR. ARNOLD: I've moved on to the conceptual PUD master plan. It's a little easier to see, but I'll sort of orient you. So to the -- north is to your right, and that's Golden Gate Parkway. So starting on the far-left portion of the screen is our public use tract, and that was where we made provisions for there to be the governmental facility uses and/or the potential for community facility use which might be in the form of a veterans nursing home that you've probably heard about. And then as you go farther east, we have a tier of residential that's not included, and then we have a tract of land that's owned by the county now that was part of the original golf course that Page 9 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) we labeled community facility. It also makes provisions for governmental facilities and the group housing use, which might include the nursing home. And then to the east we have the commercial Parcel B, which is the JD Jags site, which is just about half an acre. So it's -- it's almost nonfunctional in future context unless there's shared parking, which there is a shared parking agreement in place. And then, of course, the hotel parcel itself is a little over six acres, and that has the existing hotel. We've made provisions for that to be either timeshare as well, because it's a permitted use under the existing RT zoning, or future C-3 residential, and there are several conditions that staff has posed, and I've got a couple of comments I want to make when we get to the closing on that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: While we have this map up, okay. So I'm just a little confused. You mentioned that there was an area that the -- it's for government services and an area that, otherwise, is for county. I'm trying to figure that out, because I see the hash tag -- the hash is where it says "government public services and residential tourist subdistrict." So the hashes are the same down there where the hotel is, so I'm trying to figure out what's -- that's confusing to me because, obviously, those are very different uses. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. So the public-use tract I'm circling with the mouse, and then the community facility tract is here. The hotel tract is here, and it excludes what's known as Commercial Tract Parcel B. So Commercial Tract B is the JD Jags building. That's small. It's about a .45-acre piece of property. So it's zoned, and then there's an area that's not included also zoned RT. It gets confusing, but there are some condominiums on that parcel. They were not a participant in this process. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Is there land that the county is going to use? MR. ARNOLD: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Where? MR. ARNOLD: The county will either utilize what's known as the public-use tract, or it will use the community-facility tract. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: And it will use part of commercial Tract B, Parcel B, that it owns. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: The one question that we don't know for sure what they intend to do with it -- it may become part of right-of-way, but the county owns a parcel of land that zoned C-3 right at the hard corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard, right here, and that's zoned C-3. It's in a commercial subdistrict unto itself under the Golden Gate Master Plan. We've included it in our zoning. It permits all C-3 uses. It might permit a parking lot. It may permit water management features when they redo the intersection. We're unclear on that. So then the largest part of this entire process becomes, then, the golf course that remains around the Par 1 condominiums that are located in the middle in this hatched area. That's the Par 1 Condominium project. And then the residential component, which is allowing up to 400 affordable housing units, is on the residential tract. That tract is a little less than 25 acres, but it's separated from its nearest neighbors by an 81-foot-wide greenway. So that's the first greenway area we're dealing with under this process. And then the second greenway area -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Excuse me. Commissioner Klucik, has your question been answered? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. So that residential tract is where the nonmarket housing is going to be? MR. ARNOLD: That's correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: All right. And then who is actually doing that? Who owns that? Who's going to actually -- Page 10 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) MR. ARNOLD: The county will retain ownership of everything it currently owns, and they will have lease agreements with each of those participants. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, okay. So the residential tract there that we're talking about is owned by the county and will continue to be owned by the county? MR. ARNOLD: That's correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And then -- but the funds to build this are all private funds? MR. ARNOLD: No, sir. There's -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: These are county funds? MR. ARNOLD: There's a combination of several funding opportunities, which is why Mr. Klatzkow mentioned there's some urgency for the county to get this through. The Community Foundation of Collier County -- Mr. Klatzkow can help me if I'm wrong -- but I think it's somewhere around $10 million that were pledged to go toward an affordable housing project here. There's also some other state funding. There's also going to be bank financing through Rural Neighborhoods, who was selected by Collier County to be the actual building and developer of the affordable housing component. It will also include a senior housing component for seniors that are -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So are these going to be purchase or rental? MR. ARNOLD: These will be rental. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: These will all be rental. And the county is going to maintain ownership and be the receiver of the leases or -- of the payments? MR. ARNOLD: The Rural Neighborhoods will be the developer. They will be in charge of leasing each of those facilities. The county will have a ground lease with Rural Neighborhoods. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So we're basically -- the county is just holding the property and giving more or less carte blanche to do the project as conceived to the private entity? MR. KLATZKOW: Think of it as a public/private partnership. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. Okay. MR. ARNOLD: There is a separate agreement in place, as a separate agreement for the golf course developer. They will lease the land from Collier County. The driving range complex will lease the property. The future user, if it becomes a veterans nursing home facility, would lease that property from Collier County. Collier County will retain ownership of everything that it currently owns under the plan today. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And is -- the plan for this housing, is it to be perpetual? MR. ARNOLD: Jeff, I don't know what the agreement said with respect to that. You may know. MR. KLATZKOW: My recollection is that it is -- I don't know what "perpetual" means, but there's no end date to it. These are affordable. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: In other words, it can't convert to market after 10 years or after 20 years? MR. KLATZKOW: My recollection is, no, they cannot. I could be in error, but that's my recollection. MR. ARNOLD: Mine as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: As a friendly reminder to Commissioner Klucik, please use your -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MR. KLATZKOW: And I do have the affordable housing -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I apologize. You're right. I'm filibustering. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's all right. Commissioner Schmitt has been waiting patiently. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's fine. Here's your button. Wayne, the general location of the driving range, that is the -- that's marked out, delineated Page 11 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) there with a -- okay. MR. ARNOLD: It is. Let me give you this drawing. It's a little bit more clear where things are at. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's the driving range. That -- is that going to be the driving range also for the golf course? Just curious. MR. ARNOLD: It would be a driving complex -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Complex. MR. ARNOLD: -- associated with it. It will have a restaurant. There's also a First Tee golf facility that's a component of that. There will be putting greens and things of that nature associated with that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And as part of this, then, the -- as per a previous approval, I think, from staff, that facility is considered an accessory use to the golf course, or is that specifically identified in the PUD? I don't remember reading that. MR. ARNOLD: It's both, Mr. Schmitt. If I could answer that, the golf course zoning allows golf course and driving range. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. MR. ARNOLD: There are restrictions for the number of seats, for instance, in a golf course clubhouse under your code, 250. This facility wishes to have 350 seats, so we've made provisions for 350 seats associated with their restaurant. So that's one difference under the general golf course standards. But, otherwise, they had submitted plans, and they're under review currently for Site Development Plans for the golf course and the driving range complex today under the golf course zoning district. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So even the, what I would call, commercial facilities of that entity that's going to rent or build is deemed an accessory use to the golf course? MR. ARNOLD: That's correct. It will be permitted use by right -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MR. ARNOLD: -- as zoning occurs, but they are accessory today. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You mentioned -- one other question since I've got the mic. You mentioned six-laning of Collier Boulevard, and maybe staff will bring that up as well, either Trinity or Mike. But the timing of that, that's -- my greatest concern is the timing of that in regards to the development being completed. So I guess we'll wait for staff to address those issues. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Bosi, did you want to be heard now? I thought you were raising your hand. MR. BOSI: No, no. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sorry. MR. ARNOLD: Mr. Schmitt, the one aspect of the Collier Boulevard widening that is beneficial to the county is that you already own the right-of-way that's going to be basically utilized for it, and it's approximately 40 feet of the golf course property, it's my understanding. This is your five-year CIP. I don't know exactly where it is in terms of design. I know that design is underway. I don't think it's been finalized. So they're still trying to decide some other roadway improvements. There probably will be a weir replacement on the canal. There may be a bridge relocation bringing traffic in and out of Golden Gate over to Collier Boulevard. So there's some other moving pieces, it's my understanding, but at least you control the right-of-way. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: So sort of just a site summary to show you how all this 171 acres adds up. You've got a couple of acres of traditional commercial, we've got the residential tourist area that's a little over six acres, the residential's about 25 and a half, community facility designation's about 8.3, your public-use area's about 13-and-a-half acres, the golf course, as it remains, will be about 112 acres, and then it's about four acres for the right-of-way reservation. Page 12 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) So we also have the greenways that were shown on that plan. The greenway adjacent to the residential I already spoke about down in the lower part of the screen. We also end up with greenways wrapping around between the public-use area and the community-facility tract where those abut residential, and then we have a greenway adjacent to our public-use area. And to make up the acreage that we needed to meet your golf course conversion requirements, we took some unused area from the county that they didn't really program for the golf course and made that a greenway. And so as part of the greenway requirements, that has to be maintained as green space. You can have certain water management features. You can have certain recreational uses in it. It can be used for passive recreation. So we don't know what the county will ultimately do with that portion of their greenway, but it's there and it meets the 16-point-something-acre requirement that you have under the code. I don't know how much you want me to go into all of the details, if you want me to just sort of go to the end and talk about some of the issues that we have. I've got development standards I can talk about if you-all have certain development standards. I would point out on the residential tract, most of those are going to be three-story buildings. The senior housing, we made provisions for it to be 85 feet tall, and that would allow it to be probably six stories over parking potentially. That's not designed yet, but that's why that standard is in there, and it probably seems a little taller than many of you have been accustomed to seeing. But that would be a more vertical element for income-restricted senior housing. This is a more specific layout that we showed the public at our last neighborhood meeting. It shows you the orientation of the three-story buildings adjacent to the greenway and then adjacent to single-family homes, and the ends of those buildings were turned to residential to minimize any potential impact. We did some view studies demonstrating that with the landscape buffer and the greenway separation there really isn't a view of a three-story building from those single-family homes. Rural Neighborhoods, they've developed all over the state of Florida. They're looking at several different styles. We showed these renderings to the public. No style has been selected, but these reflect some other three- and four-story product that they have constructed around the area between more of a modern style, the West Indies that we see around town now, and then a more typical Florida style. I'm going to just go through these. So this was the BigShots conceptual rendering, which we won't mention their name, but it is on the screen. And it shows the orientation more specifically of the driving range entertainment complex. It's more of a targeted golf system. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Since you threw up the range there, will they manage the golf course as well, or does the golf course remain under control of the county? MR. ARNOLD: There's going to be an agreement between the county and ClubCorp that will renovate and manage the golf course. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: And it's my understanding the driving range complex is another sub-entity of ClubCorp. I don't know how they operate internally, but they're both owned by the same parent company. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But the county still owns the golf course. MR. ARNOLD: The land. Yes, the county will own the golf course property. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Just curious as to the ownership of the land. Thanks. MR. ARNOLD: So we've asked for a few deviations from the code. Landscape buffers, we asked for there to be no landscape buffer required between any of the internal tracts and the golf course property. We thought it made sense not to provide buffers, because if we end up with a nice nursing home complex, it would be nice for them to have views of the golf course rather than Page 13 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) to have a buffer that they have to look at. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Arnold, I want to state that in a slightly different way and see if I can get your concurrence. My understanding is is that there will be buffers except where the view is of green space. MR. ARNOLD: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is that a correct statement? MR. ARNOLD: I think that's fair to say, yes, yep. And also it applies -- there's no buffer along the greenway. So we don't have to put the greenway in plus an additional buffer. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Understood. But the borders of the project and where a view would be something other than green space would be buffered? MR. ARNOLD: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: So the first two deviations reflected that landscape buffer deviation. Deviation 3 relates to parking. So the -- we made a provision for the off-street parking to not be required separately for the outdoor dining area for the restaurant component. There's already going to be shared parking between the golf course, the driving range complex, and there's probably not going to be night use of the golf course, but there might be night use of the driving range complex and restaurants, so there's ample parking there. There's typical language about a transit facility, reduction in parking. The affordable housing development will allow an administrative reduction by up to 10 percent for their parking if necessary. And then parking for the hotel use is going to be shared with the commercial properties. There was a separate agreement in place, and the OR book and page is referenced there, and it will remain void -- or it will remain valid, I should say, even after rezoning of that RT parcel. And then for the group housing, we've asked for an FAR increase from .45 to .6, what you've commonly seen. And because we don't know who the end users may be for that group housing use, we thought it made sense to go ahead and ask for the deviation now so that we don't have to come back and do this again, because it's likely it will be under some urgency at that point because it's likely to be a state and county project. That shows you the location of these deviations, and you can see that the only one that's near the perimeter is on the canal, in Golden Gate Canal. And that really wraps up where we are. A couple things I did want to mention. Staff has made several recommendations to you as this has evolved since we've started the process. And I think we're in agreement with all of -- "we" meaning the representative of the county is in agreement with staff's recommended changes. I did want to highlight, No. 1. It says, lights shall be fully shielded to avoid light spillage onto other properties. I don't exactly what the term "fully shielded" means, but -- I don't know that that's the correct term. I mean, maybe we talk about having cutoff shields or, you know, lighting that's focused away from adjacent residential properties or something to that effect. I'd like your concurrence to maybe work with staff to develop a commitment that says something different than fully shielded because to me fully shielded means maybe it's completely enclosed, and that doesn't work for lighting. So that's that comment. The other comment is one that affects potentially the hotel property. And the way that is written that it says it would develop on -- it's No. 4 on your recommendation. It says, amend Exhibit A, Table 4, add Footnote 3. If hotel is developed with any of the allowed C-3 uses, then C-3 development standards apply. And I think for Mr. Yovanovich's client, that language should probably be cleaned up to say that if new buildings are constructed on that parcel, they would comply with the C-3 development standards, because I don't want -- I don't and I'm sure Mr. Yovanovich doesn't want somebody to decide that redoing their parking lot becomes redevelopment and, therefore, somehow it has to comply with C-3 because the hotel would not comply with C-3 development standards. So I think that language needs to be reworded so that it Page 14 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) reflects new buildings would be in compliance with that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any objection from up here to that? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I asked staff a little bit about the commercial designation there, and it was confirmed that C-3 is the extent of the commercial activity. It does not extend to C-4 or above. And that -- that is part of the understanding, correct? Even though the other parcel, the little piece in the extreme northeast, is C-4, the hotel is C-3; is that correct? MR. ARNOLD: The hotel parcel is zoned RT today. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, but it would be C-3, not C something else? MR. ARNOLD: That's correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: I assume you want me to state that on the record. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sure. Yeah. MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes. And my concern, candidly, was -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Why don't you identify -- MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm sorry. For the record, Rich Yovanovich. My concern was a restaurant's a C-3 use. If I put a restaurant in the hotel, am I now stuck with C-3 standards versus having to argue that the restaurant is an accessory to the hotel? So new structure's fine, and that's what I talked to staff about originally was if a new structure or C-3 structure comes in, we'll meet the C-3 standards, but if we put a C-3 use within the existing structures, I didn't want to have to somehow tear them down and start over again. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I understand. That make sense. I just wanted to clarify, because you're going to be next door to a C-4. MR. YOVANOVICH: I understand. And we've spent a lot of time with staff making sure that the appropriate uses were on the hotel designated site. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. That really concluded our presentation. So if you have additional comments, questions, we have our team here that can answer any specific questions you may have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. No one is signaling as yet. Anyone up here have questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think all of mine have been answered along the way. For clarification, this matter started at approximately 163 or '64 acres, and it grew to 170 as a result of bringing in the hotel property which was brought in as a result of Attachment Q, the contract with the county. So that's what caused the change in numbers and also what caused the fact that it had to be postponed. MR. ARNOLD: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have one question in the staff report, Wayne, and maybe -- I don't know if you're -- you had any charts to cover this, but on Page 11, the bottom of the page was a paragraph, develop -- and I'll go to the second sentence. Developer agreement commits the developer to provide 100 units for seniors at 30 to 60 percent of the area median income. Developer also proposes to provide a minimum of 250 units targeted for essential service personnel at income 60 percent to 140 percent AMI. The developer agreement also allows -- or the developer agreement allows the developer to provide a maximum of 300 units for ESP tenants at the same income range, and 5 percent of the units shall be targeted for veterans. That was a lot of housing. Is there, like, a double counting there? Because I tried to wrap that around my brain. There was -- MR. ARNOLD: Well, the developer, right now their agreement with Collier County says that they have to build at least 350 units. We're asking for a total of 400 units. That will give them some flexibility to come back and negotiate with the county. But the way that's broken Page 15 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) down, it was negotiated between Collier County Commission and the developer as part of them being selected to be the builder of the affordable housing units. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You as the applicant, the way the parameters are identified here, have no argument with the percentage requirements that are being imposed upon you? MR. ARNOLD: Those have been imposed already by the Collier County County Commission. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. And I have one question for staff when we get to it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Anybody else have a question for the applicant? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead, sir. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. The 300 units is the cap that the developer agreement allows, and what's being proposed as we go forward that we would be voting on is for 250 of those 300 ESP units? MR. ARNOLD: You're being asked to approve 400 units in the PUD. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, right. The developer agreement allows the developer to provide a maximum of 300, and what we're -- what's being proposed now is to do 250 out of those 300 ESP units and then an additional 100 units for the senior? MR. ARNOLD: Correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And then -- so that would be a total of 350, and then another 50 units of what? MR. ARNOLD: They haven't decided. They may not build 400 units, but it's there so they wouldn't have to go back through the rezoning process. They could go directly to the County Commission and amend their agreement. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Would it have to be something other than market-rate housing, or could those 50 be market rate? MR. ARNOLD: I don't know. We've not contemplated anything other than what I'll call income-restricted housing. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I guess that would be a question. Are we -- I don't care if we are or not. I'm just asking. Are we going to be approving the opportunity for 50 market-rate units? I'm asking our attorney, I guess, if we were to approve this. MR. KLATZKOW: Potentially, yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And, like I said, I'm not -- I'm not necessarily against that. I just want to make sure I know what's being proposed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Other questions for the applicant? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not -- MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- we'll hear from staff. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Division. We have -- at the end of our staff report we've provided a recommendation of approval for the MPUD with a number of additional conditions we're asking to be added to the PUD as well as recommendation of approval for the Growth Management Plan amendment. I would like to ask Parker Klopf of our Comp Planning team to provide a little clarification, a couple minor adjustments to the GMP amendment that we need to get onto the record. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. KLOPF: Good morning, Commissioners. My name's Parker. I'm with Comp Planning. There was a few minor corrections -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: You might just give us your last name as well for the public record. Page 16 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) MR. KLOPF: Parker Klopf, K-l-o-p-f. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. KLOPF: There was a few minor corrections to scrivener's errors, basically, on the GMP amendment. Nothing major. A few amendments to the maps. Nothing really changed with the subdistrict language. But I just wanted to let [sic] you guys aware of that. MR. KLATZKOW: Is this -- is this -- you've made changes to stuff that they don't have? MR. KLOPF: I provided copies of it. They didn't get passed around. I apologize. One of the few first changes was a -- as shown on the screen, was to -- the subdistrict was named wrong on the list of maps. If we move forward, the land-use description section didn't have that portion, and then on the last couple pages, the maps were updated to show the correct parcels and have the government services public -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I'm having trouble following what we're -- what this is all in reference to. What document are we talking about, what page in what we do have? CHAIRMAN FRYER: That was, I think, handed out this morning. And while that is being provided to you, I'm going to express a level of discomfort and indigestion, if you will, that I know the County Attorney is sharing as well when things come to us at the last minute, whether the county itself is the applicant or a commercial enterprise is the applicant. So, please, it's -- we know that this is an important matter, and we need to get it accomplished, but it does put stress on us to review something on the fly at the very last minute and, when you possibly can, please don't let it happen. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Isn't it of our policy now we have to vote to accept this, I thought? Wasn't that part of the -- MR. KLATZKOW: You don't have to accept this at all, and I find this unacceptable. MR. BOSI: Well, could I provide a clarification? These are -- these are minor. These are not substantive adjustments. There is no substantive change that is provided for with this other than clarification. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I understand, Mike. That's not an issue. The issue is we had a very clear -- I don't know what it was -- guidance or an ordinance or whatever we talked about three meetings ago in regards to last-minute changes, and there was a procedural requirement. That's what I'm asking. MR. KLATZKOW: Commissioner, we are under time deadlines here because this thing got delayed and delayed and delayed. Normally I would 100 percent agree with you. On this case, my advice is bite the bullet on this one. Don't do this again. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'd put on the record that I have no objection, and I would say -- I would ask the Board we vote to accept this, then. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All in favor of hearing this additional material, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? Page 17 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. Please continue. MR. KLOPF: So as I had mentioned before, these were just minor scrivener's errors/corrections. Nothing really changed with the subdistrict text. All of that is going to be same as reviewed and approved. As you guys see, I went through and highlighted everything that was the minor changes, and they're just updates to the maps and to the section language or -- yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, I have some questions on the PUD document. I don't know if you're the -- MR. KLOPF: No, I'm just -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- rookie for that, or Mike, since we're going to be voting on both. On the PUD document, the staff report, I believe, just for the record, you have one correction you want to make. Let me go to it. On page -- it's my page 9A5B. It's Page -- stand by. It's Page 9 of 32 of the staff report. The paragraph -- it starts second paragraph, there -- well, it's actually a new paragraph on top of the page. And I believe it should be -- and it says six there, and it should say six-lane. Do you want to insert the word "lane" in there? It reads something to the effect of to the I-75 interchange and the six expansion. Six-lane expansion? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Bay Bellows. You are correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Just for the record, then, that word "lane" has got to go in there. MR. BELLOWS: We'll clean that up. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And on the -- just a question as to why staff is -- I have no issue with it but, again, in the final recommendation -- excuse me while I go to the page. It was the recommendation. Amendment A, add golf education school under accessory use in the golf course text. No issue, but isn't that sort of inherent with a golf course? Why do we have to single out that it's -- all golf courses have lessons and golf education. MR. ARNOLD: Wayne Arnold, for the record. Mr. Schmitt, we don't disagree with you. We felt the same way. Staff is asking for that as a simple clarification. We're happy to add the language, but that would allow First Tee without question. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, those of us who are golfers, we understand we need a lot of education. MR. ARNOLD: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any other comments? Questions for staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, it would be appropriate to hear from members of the public at this time who wish to speak. Mr. Youngblood, who do we have? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, I have two registered speakers. Our first one is going to be Kyle Littleton. And Kyle is being prompted to unmute your microphone. MR. LITTLETON: Good morning, everybody, County Commission. Thanks for letting me join you-all this morning. I live on 4200 29th Place Southwest just behind where the proposed affordable housing is going to be placed. Now just a couple of quick questions for you and hopefully a couple of quick answers. You had mentioned that the affordable housing is nonmarket. Can you clarify what that means for me, please. CHAIRMAN FRYER: County? MR. BOSI: Did you hear a question? MR. ARNOLD: For the record, this is Wayne Arnold. What that means is the county has entered into a contract with a developer by the name of Rural Neighborhoods to build essential service personnel housing and income-restricted senior housing. So these apartments that are going to be built won't come on the market for just Page 18 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) market-rate consumption. They will be income restricted at the ranges that are in the staff report and in the agreement between Collier County and the developer. MR. LITTLETON: Are there any processes in place to validate these quote-unquote requirements, i.e., emergency service personnel, income-restricted seniors, or is it going to kind of be just a "we trust you at your word" thing? MR. KLATZKOW: We trust, but we verify. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, there is an income qualification process. County staff from the Affordable Housing Department is here to answer. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think we need to hear a little more about that, if we could, please. MR. ARNOLD: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And, sir on the phone, we'll give you a chance to finish up. Let's hear more about the affordable housing now. MR. LITTLETON: Thank you very much. MR. LaROW: Good morning, Jacob LaRow with Community Human Services, for the record. Just to touch briefly and answer the question by the gentleman on the phone, the developer agreement that was entered into and Mr. Arnold referenced earlier does require that there's a set-aside provision where a number -- a percentage of the units are income targeted. The developer, Rural Neighborhoods, Steve Kirk regularly enters into and receives financing through the state Florida Housing Finance Corporation in which the income and rent restrictions are often imposed for a period of 50 years or greater. And there are annual inspections, there are annual file reviews performed by the state to ensure that any developer that receives financing either through the -- through the state programs is in compliance with that. When people rent, the initial lease-up period, there is an income verification that is performed on all the units, so -- and that's done annually for the period of affordability or compliance. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. The gentleman on the phone, any further questions, sir, or comments? MR. LITTLETON: Yeah. So basically what I'm hearing is is that even though it's being stated that these units are for low-income seniors, in the documentation that I've received in the mail -- you know, I'm sorry I couldn't be there in person. I just had COVID recently. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you for not being here in person. MR. LITTLETON: Yeah. So I guess, basically, just what I'm hearing is that this is rent-controlled housing. It doesn't matter who's really going to live there. As long as they meet the income requirements, they could move in; is that correct? MR. LaROW: So the first -- the phase that covers essential service personnel, that essential services personnel is defined in our -- a document that we submit to the state every three years called a Local Housing Assistance Plan. So there are strict definitions. Those cover skilled trades, teachers, government workers, et cetera. So there is a definition for that. That is something that Rural Neighborhoods is aware of. He has -- Mr. Kirk has plenty of experience in that as well as CHS and county staff that is involved in monitoring that. The other second phase, if you will, for the seniors, seniors is defined as 55-plus so that will -- and those are the 100 units there. Those also have the rent and income targeting. So that's all -- this is -- these types of programs have been going on for nearly 40 years, and so there's a lot of eyes on this with the county, the state, and the IRS. So there's plenty of assurances that -- and protections that the developer will have to abide by what they agreed to. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And I think it's been very useful for us to have that information provided to us again. Even though we've been told these things numerous times over the years, it's very, very important. So, caller, I appreciate your asking those questions and getting them answered. Did you have anything further, sir? Page 19 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) MR. LITTLETON: Yeah. I guess my main concern is, you know, I used to live over on Davis Boulevard. I'm a native. I was born here. I grew up here. I went to, you know, Golden Gate -- no, I'm sorry. I went to Gulf Coast High School. And, you know, I've seen -- you know, my mom used to live over in Crown Pointe before they built -- I can't remember what the name of it is -- Ospreys Landing over there, I think. And I guess the concern is -- and, you know, I talked to quite a few of my neighbors in this area, is the -- has there been any consideration given to what low-income housing might possibly do to this area? I know you had mentioned that there was a 150-bed facility without a -- really a targeted plan. You said there had -- there was no defined use yet for the 150-bed facility. Now, could that 150-bed facility eventually become a homeless veterans facility? A homeless facility? A -- you know, another St. Matthew's House? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm going to ask Mr. Bosi to make a comment or two with respect to the supply-and-demand situation being across the board in Collier County for affordable housing so that we can keep this in perspective. MR. BOSI: Thank you, Chair. Mike Bosi, again, Planning and Zoning director. I do not believe that any of these have been designated or requested to be associated with a homeless shelter or facility. What this is particularly trying to address -- and if you would -- had watched the Board of County Commissioners on the 22nd of February, there's been a recognition that there is a severe imbalance within the supply-and-demand curve related to housing units in Collier County and within the nation as a whole, but Collier County in particular as it pertains to our needs. And that supply-and-demand relationship is an overabundance of demand for a very limited supply of housing units, and this is one of the attempts of the Board of County Commissioners to take -- to take aim at that imbalance and trying to provide more supply to try to provide a better equilibrium between those two forces that are always in play and are always influencing what market rates are being charged within our market as well. So this is one of the first efforts to try to really address the supply-and-demand curve that we have the imbalance related to the over -- over-demand and under-supply that currently is experienced within the county. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And before I call on Commissioner Schmitt, I want to, just to keep things in sequence, mention at this time what a pleasure it is for us as members of the Planning Commission to acknowledge that our colleague, Commissioner Paul Shea, was unanimously elected by the Board of County Commissioners to serve on AHAC. That's the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. And we've had a long, close relationship with AHAC. Commissioner Schmitt served on it for a number of years. I think it's very important for us to be closely connected to AHAC, particularly in these times, given the Board of County Commissioners' new focus highlighting the issue of affordable housing and its importance in the county, and I know that we will be looking forward to Commissioner Shea developing into a genuine expert and then providing us reports on a regular basis to letting us know what we can do to further the cause of affordable housing in Collier County. So on behalf of the Planning Commission, thank you very much for taking that on, Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let's see. We've got Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'll wait till the speaker -- I have two other questions I wanted to ask that I failed to during the staff presentation. But I'll wait till speakers are done. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. I've got -- Commissioner Klucik, was that your light that was on? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It was mine. I turned it off. Page 20 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, somehow I've got Commissioner Vernon lit up. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, I won't blame you for thinking maybe I wanted to say something. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Somehow I've got Commissioner Vernon lit up, and I wonder who that might be. MR. BELLOWS: I believe Mr. Vernon has signed in, so he may have raised a signal. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, can he -- okay. Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No, I don't know how to -- I'm not technologically sound enough to know how to light up remotely. But since I have the floor, I apologize for not being there in person. I just have allergies, and I didn't want to be coughing on Joe and Karen. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Thank you. COMMISSIONER VERNON: So, anyway, I just -- I don't think you should go -- if I heard correctly, Community Foundation's committing a million dollars to this, and I think that's pretty significant. And the only question -- thought I had was very minor, but a little while ago I think Wayne was talking about the lighting issue that staff was recommending. I just want to make sure that that doesn't get sort of lost in everything else; that they're going to continue to explore it, but after they continue to explore it, what's the next step so that we make sure that the lighting is not a big problem, because, like I said, we're -- nobody's really focused on it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Arnold, did you want to say anything further on that? MR. BOSI: And I think -- Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. I will work with Wayne to have the acceptable -- because we understand. We want the light to be down-shielded to only -- to focus upon the property that's owned by the county and not to bleed over to any neighboring residents. So we want to make sure -- we'll work with the applicant so what's being put before the Board of County Commissioners is acceptable to all parties. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So this is a work in process, but it will get worked out before it goes to the BCC? MR. BOSI: Absolutely, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have a question on the lighting. Since we're talking lighting, the poles are 195 feet. Will there be any -- is 195 for the -- the poles that are going to be for the nets? MR. ARNOLD: They're varying heights, but the tallest, to my understanding, would be up to 195 feet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's what I thought I read. MR. ARNOLD: But we also have a lighting restriction that those lights associated with it are 60 feet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Will there be requirements for any type of warning lights because of the approach into Naples Airport? Has that been looked at, FAA requirement, any type of -- MR. BOSI: That would part of SDP for the facility. We'll have to go through coordination with the Naples Airport. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. Just so the public's aware that they're possibly going to have to have some warning lights on top of those poles. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, it probably will be required -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would expect, yes. You're in a -- the flight zone corridor. MR. ARNOLD: Typical of the cellular tower devices and others that we see around town. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything else? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I want to ask staff about the six-laning of Collier. I Page 21 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) don't -- Wayne addressed the timing, but are we going to be finishing this -- I'll call it the driving range for lack of a better term, the facility, before the six-laning is completed? You say it's in the five-year program? And -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: We have Mr. Sawyer approaching. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That is probably going to be one of the more significant issues with the public attending -- going to this venue. It's going to certainly put a burden on that section of the road. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Sawyer? MR. SAWYER: Yes. For the record, Mike Sawyer, Transportation Planning. The improvements are within the five-year work program. And as far as the exact timing, right now we're working on the location for the bridge that's going to be associated with the six-laning that will be going out into the Estates area and then also hopefully working as far as trying to get it also coordinated at the same time with the improvements at the intersection. And if you want to play Trinity's intro music, she can probably provide you some additional information. CHAIRMAN FRYER: She certainly is free to if she wishes. And here she is. MR. ARNOLD: If I might add, too, Mr. Schmitt -- this is Wayne Arnold again. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. MR. ARNOLD: The BigShots are in for Site Development Plan review today, so it's very likely that they will be ahead of the road improvement. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would expect, yes. I mean, it's pretty obvious they will be. I'm -- go ahead, Trinity. Hi. MS. SCOTT: Thank you. For the record, Trinity Scott, Department Head, Transportation Management Services. Yes, we have the six-laning of Collier Boulevard within our five-year program. As Mike indicated, we are working on a study to finalize a bridge location. There's an existing bridge that needs to move away from the Golden Gate Parkway intersection to allow that to work better. Also, the Florida Department of Transportation advanced the interchange improvements at Collier Boulevard. They anticipate starting construction next spring. That will go through 2025. So the area will certainly be under construction for quite some time in the immediate area. We are getting ready to -- we have the project at 60 percent design. We took it to 60 percent design some time ago. Once we finalize the bridge location, we will proceed forward with finalizing our design and getting that out to construction. Mr. Arnold is correct that most likely the BigShots will be well underway while we are under construction, and we will work with our contractor to make sure that we have the appropriate maintenance of traffic to accommodate the development. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Well, that's good. The public is aware. MS. SCOTT: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Ms. Scott. Let's see. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Quick question, more of an informational question, as I try to learn more about our affordable housing issues. If I were to look at that -- Mike, or it might be a question for Jacob. If I look at the picture up there, there's a tremendous number of residential units around the property that we're talking about and in it. The question is, are there any other housing in that area considered affordable under our definitions of affordable housing? There's an awful lot of different types of apartments, condos, single-families. MR. BOSI: I don't believe there's any that are set aside per contract as affordable. There may be some units that are within the Golden Gate City area that would be for sale within a price tag that fit some of the income qualifications, but we haven't performed any analysis of a market study related to the for-sale products within the local area. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So we only consider the affordable housing on projects that Page 22 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) are contracted to be affordable, even though there might be other housing in the area that fits the category? MR. BOSI: When Housing does their assessment, they perform a market analysis in terms of overall market rate in terms of what the fair market value is for housing within the area, and that helps determine the number of need for new housing and identification of how many units we need to fit our various income stratas. But for this particular -- for this project, we didn't go out and perform another market study. That's part of their annual -- that's part of their annual activities that they do. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Welcome to the debate that's been going on for 20 years since I've been here in regards to affordable housing -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yep. The answer to your question is yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- market rate versus those that are under some sort of program with the county, whether it's rent assistance or down payment assistance, all the other kind of things that -- programs that the county has. I'll talk to you about it off-line just so you're aware. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let's see if we can get back to the public speakers. Mr. Youngblood. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Did Jacob want to talk about that, or -- he looked like he wanted to talk. He answered my question, though. MR. LaROW: Okay. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I'm fine with Mike's question -- answer. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We still have that speaker. Does he have any more? He was on the line. Was he done? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think he's done. MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Hang on one second. Mr. Littleton, are you still with us? MR. LITTLETON: I still have one more question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. MR. LITTLETON: The gentleman that was just speaking about -- the councilman that was speaking about the analysis, the fair-market-value analysis, I'm sorry, what was your name? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Was it Joe Schmitt or Paul Shea? MR. LITTLETON: Yes, the gentleman to the -- I believe -- if I'm looking at the screen right, it would be the far right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Me? Him? MR. LITTLETON: In the gray jacket. The gray jacket over there. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Paul Shea. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Guilty as charged. MR. LITTLETON: Yes. Thank you, Mr. Shea. Thank you, Councilman Shea. Yeah, no, that was something that I had a concern about as well, you know. The areas back here are all single-family. They're -- I mean, as we both know -- you mentioned supply and demand, and the fair market value of the houses back here over the past two years has just absolutely exploded. You know, so there's concern among the neighborhood, among the, you know, area -- of the people that live in my area, neighbors, you know, people that we know down the street about affordable housing coming into this area. And I think more so, you know, we're concerned about the buffer that's going to be created between our neighborhood and the affordable housing units. You know, I see a greenway in the proposed planning. Is there going to be a barrier that's built as well? CHAIRMAN FRYER: We will -- any further questions you have, sir, we'll address them when staff comes back. We've got other speakers that want to talk. MR. LITTLETON: Sure, no. I understand. Five minutes, totally fine. Thank you for your time. Page 23 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you so much for your comments. Mr. Youngblood, who else do we have? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, I have one more speaker who is present with us. Cece Zenti. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ms. Zenti, you have the floor. MS. ZENTI: Thank you. Good morning. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Say your name for us. MS. ZENTI: Oh, certainly, Cece Zenti, and I live at 4226 27th Court Southwest. I've owned my condo in the Pars for 20 years. I've been a permanent resident for five. I serve on the Golden Gate community -- or Civic Association board. I also am Vice Chair of the Golden Gate Economic Development Advisory Zone board. I have one question and then a comment. And, Mr. Arnold, what I need is this draft back up. I have a question that dovetails what the previous gentlemen has just asked. And the houses -- okay. There. If you look in that gray area, it looks like a little -- not quite a cul-de-sac but like a cul-de-sac, and if you look right at that curve there, those are homes, okay. Those are homeowners, actual homes, single-family. Now, there are -- there's a portion of land that was between two homes right at that point that the county bought for a walkway, is my understanding. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Excuse me for a moment, ma'am. Would someone point to -- so that we can see on the visualizer where the lady's talking about. MR. ARNOLD: She's talking about this area. MS. ZENTI: Right, exactly. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. Sorry to interrupt. Go ahead. MS. ZENTI: So there is a vacant portion between homes, and the county owns -- it was going to be used for a walkway. Now, at one of our civic association meetings, the homeowners were concerned about the traffic they are going to -- or possibly get through that. And the previous gentleman talked about the green barrier, and Commissioner Saunders at the time said we would not make that a walkway. So I'm just trying to confirm that those homeowners, as part of the civic association board, are going to be protected. Other than that, the workforce housing, I think, is wonderful -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MS. ZENTI: -- and I'm all for it, and I live at the Pars. And I'd just like to say one thing about lighting. I was in the line of lighting of the previous driving range, and it hit all of Par 4 condos. So anything else would be an improvement, trust me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And before Mr. Arnold answers, I want to ask Mr. Youngblood if we have any more speakers. MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, I don't have any other registered speakers for these items. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Is there anyone in the room who wishes to be heard on this matter? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, we'll close the public comment portion, and, Mr. Arnold, you can pick up, please, if you would. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. In response to her comment about the pedestrian interconnection, we've demonstrated that location on the PUD master plan with this little diagonal arrow in the corner of the project down by the residential, and the county owns the property. And I don't believe any decision's been made. They looked at that as a potential utility improvement project. We looked at it as a possible interconnection for pedestrians to get to school, for instance, as a way, instead of having to go all the way up to Golden Gate Parkway or all the way south down Collier Boulevard, to potentially Page 24 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) have a pedestrian connection. That decision is something the county commissioner is going to make, what they ultimately want to do with their property. But we've made provisions for there to be an interconnection on the conceptual plan. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And thank you, Mrs. Zenti. I'm looking at the clock. It's 18 minutes after 10:00. We would have our midmorning break at 10:30. My question to the Planning Commission is, are we going to have extensive discussion at this point, or do we believe that we're pretty close to being ready to vote? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Vote. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just have some comments. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All right. Then we'll target for a 10:30 midmorning break. And, Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We closed the public hearing? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I already did. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. My comments are: This board, as well as the staff, spent, I have to believe, at least four or five meetings amending the LDC, and I want to commend a former colleague of ours, Mark Strain, who worked hard on this golf course conversion process as well as the staff. This is the first golf course to come in. We knew this was coming. And I think this applicant followed perfectly to the letter in regards to the guidance that was provided with regards to meeting with the public, coming up with the options, and at least -- like any public presentation, getting at least a majority to accept the changes. I think this is just a great example of the use of -- both from the staff perspective, the amendments that were created and then the LDC guidance that was formulated and codified by the Board of County Commissioners. I would move to recommend approval for both the Comp Plan amendment and the PUD -- PUD proposal. Recommend approval subject to the staff's recommendations and a few of the changes we noted in the staff report. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I'll second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? If not, we're voting both on the PUD and the GMP. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you very much. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Rich, you had a comment? Do you want steal victory from the jaws of defeat here or -- MR. YOVANOVICH: I wanted to make sure your motion included our discussion about modifying when the trigger would be on the C-3 uses because staff's recommendation was a little bit vague. We talked about -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. I say yes because it appeared that staff recognized that as a change that they approved. MR. YOVANOVICH: I just wanted to make sure. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes, thank you. Page 25 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Mr. Chairman, I would just say thank you. It's been a process. I think we've all learned a lot. And I think that one thing -- my takeaway is that as written, the golf course conversion, it's not an easy process, but I don't think it was really written with the intent that we have a partial conversion like you had on the county's project. So maybe in the future there can be tweaks to acknowledge that. Otherwise, it's a good process. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. We have a difficult one coming soon, and -- because I've already seen reports in the news about it, and hopefully staff has lessons learned and somehow when that comes before us, we'll at least incorporate some of the lessons learned. Thanks. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I would just say that, you know, in the interest of fairness to Mr. Yovanovich and his client, since he brought that, that needs to be memorialized in some way in writing so that it's -- you know, we didn't expressly talk about it before we voted, but then we kind of added it afterwards, and -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I'll amend my motion to accept that proposal as discussed. And it appeared from staff there was no objection, so I amend my proposal to accept that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We'll revote then. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I'll do the same. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All those in -- further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. All right. It's 10:22. Let's be back here, please, at 10:35. We stand in recess until then. Thank you. (A brief recess was had from 10:22 a.m. to 10:35 a.m.) MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ladies and gentlemen, let's return to session, please. And when we redid the agenda, I sort of lost my train of thought, and I apologize for that. But stepping back a little bit, we need to first look at Planning Commission absences. And right now we've got one planning commissioner who's absent, Commissioner Shea. But what I'm going to want to know is whether those who are at the dais know that that they will be here and able to participate on April 7, which is our next meeting. Anybody know whether he or she will not be able to participate? Commissioner Shea, will you be able to? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Good. Perfect. Thank you. To that same point, really, we're going to be getting pretty busy into the summer. So everybody, whatever you can do going back to a regular semi-monthly schedule, we need to be Page 26 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) doing that so that we can move things forward. And approval of minutes. We do not have any before us to take action on. BCC reports, recaps, Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. On March 8th, the Board of County Commissioners heard the LDCA amendments that created the limited density pool for the Bayshore Zoning Overlay. That was approved on their summary agenda. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Anything else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's it. Okay. Under Chairman's report, the only thing that I want to mention here arises from the way we sort of took things out of order this morning in order primarily to accommodate, well, both the staff and Board of County Commissioners but also the public. Generally speaking, we will not go out of line in order to hear from members of the public when we're not varying from our posted agenda. But since we did vary from our posted agenda, it seemed fair that we allow members of the public who had relied upon a different order of sequence to be heard. So that -- we're not setting any kind of a precedent by doing that. And that's all I had under Chairman's report. Consent agenda, we don't have any. So now I believe we're ready to get back to our agenda. ***And the next matter that is to come before us, I believe, is the Sabal Palm rezone. And that is PL20210002322. It's the Sabal Palm rezone. It's a straight rezone. And for that presentation, the Chair will recognize Ms. Passidomo. COMMISSIONER SHEA: We're not doing the first one, 9A1? CHAIRMAN FRYER: What's staff's preference? Do we have any members of the public on this? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: We don't? All right. Well -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Let's do Sabal Palm then. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Let's do Sabal Palm. Staff's going to be here anyway, and we can do that. Ms. Passidomo, you have the floor. MS. PASSIDOMO: Good morning, members of the Planning Commission. Francesca Passidomo, for the record, here on behalf of the petitioner, the Shapiros. Mr. Shapiro's here with me in the audience. Also here with me is Wayne Arnold. He's on the project team. From the staff report, we're in -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I have neglected to do my ex parte and also swear in witnesses. So I'm just -- please don't judge my ability to conduct a meeting based upon my performance today. I'm just slightly out of tune. Let's start with ex parte with Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff materials only. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Staff materials for me. That's it. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Nothing for me. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Staff only. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Staff only. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And everyone who wishes to be heard on this matter, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon, do you have a report, ex parte? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Staff only. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Ms. Passidomo, sorry to interrupt. Go right ahead. MS. PASSIDOMO: Thank you. This is a rezone petition to rezone agriculturally zoned Page 27 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) property to RSF3 consistent with the Growth Management Plan density. In order to obtain the density of three units for the one acre -- 1.35 acres, we will be obtaining a transfer of development right credit at the time of subdivision plat. There's a condition that staff has recommended and we're in agreement with. We worked with the County Attorney's Office and staff on that specific condition. I have a presentation that I can walk through to go through the location criteria and items that you may want specifically addressed but, in summary, we're in agreement with staff's findings in the staff report. So it's -- it's your preference if you'd like for me to go through the entire presentation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Would anyone on the Planning Commission care to hear the entire presentation? Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I just have an amendment. I did speak to the applicant about this. Senior moment, I failed to -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- recognize that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I did, too, and I'm also going to blame it on a senior moment plus the fact that I just haven't been functioning on all two cylinders. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We get to do that, you know, every once in a while. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think you're right. Yeah, so this is the day. I don't think we need to hear the whole presentation, Ms. Passidomo. County Attorney, am I still screwing up here? MR. KLATZKOW: I think you're doing a great job. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. I needed that. MR. KLATZKOW: But I'm a suck-up. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Thank you. All right. Ms. Passidomo, thank you. Staff report, please. Oh, Commissioner Schmitt, did you want something? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, that was it. I just wanted to amend the record. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. As contained within Page 9 of 9 of the staff report, staff is recommending approval with one individual condition of the obtaining the TDR prior to development. And it's simply, like I said, for three units on 1.35 acres consistent with the density within the surrounding area, and staff is recommending approval. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Any members of the public? I take it there are none, Mr. Youngblood? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: (Shakes head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Any questions or comments for anybody from the Planning Commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, we'll close the public hearing component, and we will have discussion and/or proceed to a vote. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I make a motion to approve. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. Page 28 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. MS. PASSIDOMO: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Do you want to get the vote -- was there a vote on the phone? I didn't hear. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon, we didn't hear your vote. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, I didn't. I forgot to unmute, but I vote in favor of it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. It passed 6 to nothing, then. Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner Schmitt. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. ***Let's see. The third matter is PL2021000893. It's the Siena Lakes CCRC CPUD amendment. And just so that we all start off knowing what we're talking about, CCRC stands for continuing care retirement community. And I didn't see a reference to the long version of that acronym in the ordinance itself. When I did an electronic word search, I found it three times in the agenda packet. But check on me; I might have overlooked it. But we want to be sure if we use the acronym CCRA that somewhere in the ordinance itself that we spell out what we're talking about. You may proceed, ma'am. MS. McMICHAEL: Good morning, Commissioners. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Now, hold it. I did it again. I'm going home. Thank you. All those wishing to be heard in this matter, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: And disclosures. See, I did the wrong order again. Disclosures starting with Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff materials only. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Same. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Nothing for me. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Nothing for me as well. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just county material and discussion. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Now you may proceed. MS. McMICHAEL: Good morning, again. My name is Paula McMichael. I'm director of planning with Hole Montes here on behalf of the applicant, Erickson Living, regarding the Siena Lakes Continuing Care Retirement Community Commercial Planned Unit Development. I do have here with me a representative from the applicant, Bryan Palmer; Rich Yovanovich; Bob Mulhere; myself; and Craig Smith, who is the ecologist for the project. So you may all be familiar with the location. This is on the east side of Airport Road on the north side of Orange Blossom Drive. It's the Siena Lakes community. It's under construction. It's been approved and is under construction. It totals about 35 acres on the north side of Orange Blossom. The property is separated by Siena Lakes Drive, so you'll hear me discuss the property on the west side of Siena Lakes Drive, which is a little over five acres, and the property on the east of Siena Lakes Drive, which is about 29 acres. So the property was originally rezoned to a continuing care retirement community back in 2009. It approved about 760,000 square feet of building at a floor area ratio of 0.6. In 2019, the property was amended to include that area on the west side of Siena Lakes Drive, so that was added Page 29 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) in 2019. And that increased the approval for the building square footage to about 878,000 square feet and a combined floor area ratio of 0.58. Before I get into the footnote, I just wanted to do a brief description of what a floor area ratio is for those of you who may not be familiar with that concept. So the floor area ratio is the building floor area divided by the total lot area. So it's a calculation of building floor area divided by the lot area. CHAIRMAN FRYER: An FAR of 1 is the building covers the entire lot. MS. McMICHAEL: Correct, correct. And then the little graphic was just to show you -- you give me too many numbers, and they don't make any imprint on my brain, so I included some pictures here. So an FAR of 1, you could either cover the whole lot. If it's two stories, it would cover half the lot. If it's four stories, it would cover 25 percent of the lot. So the floor area ratio is just the building to the lot area. There are other considerations for height, setback, lot coverage. That would also influence how that gets developed. So, again, in 2019, it was approved at a combined floor area ratio for the entire 35 acres of 0.58 with a footnote limitation that -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: That's what we see on Page 3 of the report, of the packet? MS. McMICHAEL: There is a calculation there on Page 3, yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. I just want to make sure that I'm looking at the same information. MS. McMICHAEL: So the footnote limitation for the area that's on the east side of Siena Lakes Drive had a previously approved floor area ratio of .6, and that was maintained, and the area that was brought in in 2019 on the west side of Siena Lakes Drive had a floor area ratio of 0.45. When you did that calculation, it was a combined floor area ratio of 0.58. So the request before you is to remove this footnote limitation and to allow the floor area ratio to be calculated over the entire 35 acres. The CCRC was approved for 431 independent living units, 47 assisted living units, 30 skilled nursing and memory beds. We're not changing any of that, so it's the same number of units that was previously approved. We're not changing the approved building heights, the setbacks, landscape buffers; none of that is changing. It is just to change the way the floor area ratio is calculated. So this should mimic what you have in your package on Page 3. So this is just the calculations of what that change looks like. So on the west side of Siena Lakes Drive, previously it would have allowed about 114,000 square feet of building, and with the change it would allow about 33,000 more square feet on the area west of Siena Lakes Drive, and then on the area east of Siena Lakes Drive we're reducing the amount of building square footage by about 25,000 square feet. So, overall, the increase from what's approved to what we're proposing is about 7,900 square feet additional building square footage but, again, we're not changing any of the units, the unit count at all. And this is what the changes look like to the PUD documents. So, again -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So what you just said, I think, is what I was wondering. So there's 7,800 additional improved -- MS. McMICHAEL: It would allow about 7,900 additional building square footage. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And what is the reason -- you know, what are you doing with that? Why do you need that? MS. McMICHAEL: So what they would like to do -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Because, obviously, there was a plan and everyone was like, ooh, wow, this is what we're going to do, and then all of a sudden someone stopped and said, Page 30 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) wow, we either need to, or we'd really like to, or it would be great if we could. Let's go back. It's a big deal, so it must have been really important. MS. McMICHAEL: Right. So the building on the west side of Siena Lakes Drive gets a little bit bigger, and those are the independent living units, and that's what they -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Was there something to drive the need to make it bigger? Because, obviously, this was all planned ahead of time by professionals who knew what the goal was. What was the trigger to suddenly say, wow, we're halfway through building this; we need to go back and ask for 8,000 square feet more. MS. McMICHAEL: Again, it was driven by the market demand for the independent living units which are a little bit bigger than the assisted living memory care. So that is the reason for the additional building square footage. That is their independent -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So is it to make the same units bigger -- you know, no more additional units, just make them bigger, or -- MS. McMICHAEL: Correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- to build additional units? MS. McMICHAEL: No additional units. It would just be larger units. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. BOSI: And, Chair, I just wanted to let you know, I put a display on, and it shows you where the actual building area is going to be added to, on the visualizer. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. MS. McMICHAEL: And I do have that also in my presentation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Anything further, ma'am? MS. McMICHAEL: Just -- I was getting to exactly what Mike Bosi just brought up, so this is the approved master plan. So you can see the building on the west side of Siena Lakes. Originally it ended right about here. With the revision, it becomes more of a horseshoe. It comes around to Siena Lakes Drive. So that is the increase in the building. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. And I take it your client is okay with the condition with respect to the updated listed species survey? MS. McMICHAEL: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. And we will have to take action as the EAC also on this in addition, which we will be prepared to do. And we've got Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I think I need to go back to the floor area ratio. I think I understood it, but now I'm not sure that I do when you go through the -- to me it seems like the intent of it is you want to know the footprint of the building on the -- relative to the lot, right? Isn't that the idea? CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's the aggregate floors. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So if you have 10 floors, it's 10 times the footprint? MR. BOSI: A floor area ratio is not to control the building -- the lot coverage. A floor area ratio is to control the amount of square footage that would be associated within any individual business and any one parcel of land. And it's tied to the acreage. So you get a relationship ratio of how much square footage is going to be provided for within a structure related to the square footage that's associated with the underlying parcel. It's not about lot coverage. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. MS. McMICHAEL: So it limits the intensity of the use, but it would not limit the building setback or height. Those are other development standards that are included in the ordinance. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, the only reason I asked that is it wouldn't make any sense to use the total acreage if I was right but, obviously, I'm wrong in what I think the intent is. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I mean, it does -- it does relate to lot coverage because if you have Page 31 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) a single floor at a FAR of 1, you're going to cover the entire lot, but then if you have two floors, you're covering 50 percent, and you're getting an FAR of 1. And all -- and continuing up the line. So, I mean, it doesn't exclusively relate to lot coverage, but lot coverage is a factor, but so is the number of floors. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, when we get time, we need to cover this issue on the environmental. I think we'll have to have Craig talk or give us an idea of what -- MS. McMICHAEL: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- he viewed on site in regards to the listed species, and what was brought up by two of the speakers in regards to the study recommended by staff that the applicant provide an updated listed species survey and written authorization from FWC, which was Florida Wildlife Commission, to impact wading birds' roosting areas prior to the issuance of the PPL SDP. So that was the stipulation by staff. I want to make sure that, number one, you're in agreement with this and the issue that was raised by the public in regards to the -- I believe they cited blue heron -- blue heron. MS. McMICHAEL: Yes. We are in agreement with the condition. We offered a clarification, because the FWC does not regulate bird roosting areas. They regulate bird nesting areas, so that's just a clarification, and then if they are present. But Craig Smith with DexBender is here if you have questions about the -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I would like to hear what he observed, and is there any requirement for a take permit or any other type of impact that was noted with the increase of construction on this site. MR. SMITH: Good morning. My name is Craig Smith with DexBender, for the record. We're the environmental consultant. We did do a listed species survey back in May of 2018 for the original development. We did not note any nesting by any listed species on the site, including wading birds. We did see little blue herons foraging on the sides of the lakes, and I think we saw a few green herons perching in the shrubs, but nothing else. I have reached out to FWC, and they did confirm that for state-listed wading birds, the only activity that would require a take is regarding nesting of those species. The only caveat would be if you repeatedly intentionally flushed birds from a roosting area solely for that purpose, that could be considered a take and harassment. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. MR. SMITH: But if the flushing is a one-time event associated with a lawful activity, then that does not require any sort of permit from the Game Commission. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, the issues that were raised by the public speakers in regards to the impact that it may have on these birds roosting, from the state's concern, there was really no concern and, from your perspective, what will the impact be? MR. SMITH: Those birds will simply find someplace else to roost. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. SMITH: They're not nesting there. The only other thing we did note during our survey is there was an abundance of brown iguanas on the site, and those would be predating [sic] on nests if there were any in those willows, which is typically why an actual nesting colony will be surrounded by water, whereas the birds are roosting in trees that are right on the banks. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes, thank you. So we're talking about where that little lake is in the corner? That's where all this building is that's being modified? So right now there -- on the picture, the color picture that shows the construction, actually, from above, that is -- it would be where that lake is? That's where the Page 32 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) building that's being modified is, being enlarged? MR. SMITH: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. Has that already been filled in? MS. McMICHAEL: It has not been filled in yet. But, again, that -- the building location and the lake location were approved in 2019. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Got it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Any further from the applicant? MR. SMITH: For the record, I was out there this morning and did another quick look, and there's no evidence of any nesting in those willows. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything further, applicant? MS. McMICHAEL: No. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. We'll now turn to staff. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows with Planning and Zoning Division. I have reviewed this project with our contract planner, Laura DeJohn, and we found this project consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and there are -- will not have any traffic impacts. And we have reviewed this with our environmental staff, and we are agreeing to the revision as outlined by Paula McMichael on the staff recommendation, and we are recommending approval. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. MR. BELLOWS: And this is an EAC item, so same goes for the EAC vote. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, thank you. Do we have any members of the public who wish to be heard on this? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: (Shakes head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: We do not, okay. We will close the public comment portion of the meeting. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just to recognize that we already heard from the public on this. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, we did, that's true. We heard before the matter was called. So there were two members of the public, and, Commissioner Schmitt, thank you for addressing those concerns. So now it's appropriate for us to deliberate and/or vote. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I make -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Care to make a motion? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'll make a motion. I make a motion that we approve PL20210000893 based on the -- with the staff recommendation as cited. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. And that's a joint -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: As amended, yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. This is a joint motion. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's a joint motion both as the EAC we'll have to vote and then as the Planning Commission. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Any further discussion on this? And this is subject to the condition that staff had identified. Any further discussion? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, sir. Go ahead, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. So we have the two sections that had this FAR rating, and what we're doing is you've determined that you're not actually going to use, I said, or consume all of your FAR rating on the right-hand portion, the eastern portion, so you're giving up some of that so that you can use it on the left side, and then you're also asking for Page 33 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) 30-some-thousand more square feet. Is that essentially correct? MS. McMICHAEL: That is essentially that except it's about 7,900 additional square feet. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, no, I'm talking about the -- MS. McMICHAEL: On the west -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: The large -- yeah, the master -- I guess that's the lot size? Or no. What is that larger number, the 875,000? MS. McMICHAEL: That is the total square footage over the entire 35 acres. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. So you're -- and somehow you reduced the total square footage. Where's that chart? Yeah, so you reduced 764- to 738-, you made that lot smaller. MS. McMICHAEL: That is the building square footage. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: That's the building square footage. MS. McMICHAEL: The building gets a little bit smaller on the east side of Siena Lakes Drive and -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. So it was approved for 764-, but you're really only using 738- so, therefore, you're applying -- you're saying, well, you know, we're going to go ahead, I guess -- because the totals down below, you're only increasing the west of Siena building by -- not by the total amount that you're asking for, because you're using some of the square footage from the eastern portion -- I don't know -- to get your overall .58? MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. MR. BOSI: Yes, that's what's being proposed. They are putting more building square footage on the west side, subtracting some from the east side, and asking for about close to 8,000 square feet for the overall PUD increase. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. So the net at the bottom is 8,000 square feet. The horseshoe-shaped building is getting considerably larger than what the eastern -- or the western building is getting considerably larger, but you didn't use all of your allotment on the eastern portion, and so your overall ratio ends up only requiring the 8,000 additional square feet. Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have a motion on the floor, and I see Ms. DeJohn joined us. So we should have her come up here just to defend her position. Oh, I'm sorry. You're good. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything further before we vote on this? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. It's been moved and seconded. It's a joint motion. All those in favor -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, we have to vote twice, once for EAC and then -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Actually, we don't. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: We can put them together. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, we can put them together? Okay. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Well, you did it already. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I did. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Here's -- and going forward, that's, I think, the more efficient way. The County Attorney signed off on it. But any planning commissioner can always move to divide the question if for some reason you want to vote one way on one and one on the other. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. As long as it's acceptable, we'll keep them joined. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Without objection, then we'll vote. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. Page 34 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you, applicant. ***And we'll continue to move forward here. And the next matter is the EAR. Again, this is Evaluation and Appraisal Review, that's what EAR stands for, based upon CCME, which stands for conservation and coastal management element of our GMP. This is PL20210001271. It is legislative in nature, of course, and, therefore, no need for ex parte or for me to mess up on that point or for swearing in of witnesses. And we're here for action on the question of adoption at this time. So without further ado, ma'am, you have the floor. MS. HANSEN: Rachel Hansen, senior planner with Comprehensive Planning. And today I am presenting something that -- oh, sorry. Are we good? Okay. Today I am presenting something that you've already seen but is coming back. So this is the Conservation and Coastal Management Element sea level rise. So just a brief background because, again, you have already heard this. The House Bill 1094 amended Florida Statute 163.37 -- or .3178 of the Community Planning Act, which essentially requires Collier County to amend our CCME to develop strategies that address the impact of sea level rise and flood risk/storm surge in coastal areas. We were required to add language required [sic] to best practices to develop in flood zones, and you all have a proposed Exhibit A for the CCME amendment. At the August 19th, 2021, Planning Commission meeting, you all recommended unanimously for the Board of County Commissioners to transmit the proposed CCME amendment to the DEO. In November, staff received recommended revisions from the DEO who determined that the original proposed amendment did not sufficiently establish meaningful and predictable guidelines for addressing sea level rise. DEO granted an extension for the adoption and, as a result, the county has to adopt the new proposed changes to the CCME by December 14th of 2022. And just to briefly address the changes from the last time you saw this to the updated amendment, the changes are based on research of peer counties whose CCME amendments were approved by the DEO, and the changes are an attempt to address their comments regarding the meaningful and predictable guidelines. So just to go over them briefly, Objective 14.1 sets a five-year cycle to address issues related to sea level rise, Policy 14.1.1 acknowledges data and analysis from sources including, but not limited, to NOAA and ACUNE, and then Policy 14.1.6 adds a commitment to coordinate with local municipalities regarding adaptation and mitigation measures. And then throughout the amendment there was more specific language to connect the existing objectives and policies to the objective of addressing sea level rise. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm going to interrupt for just a moment, please, to emphasize how important it is for the Planning Commission to have a redliner of what we moved at transmittal and then what's coming back to us at adoption. I had to go through these, and I took my chances, and I think I identified all the changes. What you have is fine, but there should have been a second redliner showing exactly how this differs from what we approved unanimously last time, okay, so in the future -- thank you very much. MS. HANSEN: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Can we see the language of 14.1 where -- is there an insert? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's in there. Page 35 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, on the screen while we're talking about it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I thought on the -- everything that was underlined has been added; is that correct? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, no, not since transmittal. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, I thought -- I took this as -- typically, strikethrough/underline, everything underlined was added since transmittal. That's not the case? CHAIRMAN FRYER: That is not the case. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, well. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: It's hard for us to understand what's the difference between what we approved and now what's being changed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. I personally am absolutely satisfied with these changes, but it took me a couple of hours to go through and be sure that I caught all the differences between what we did at transmittal and what we're being asked to do now. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I have several questions I want to walk through -- MS. HANSEN: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- on the proposal. MS. HANSEN: That's really all I had. So if -- by all means. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I think it's best -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: We'll let Commissioner Schmitt go ahead with his questions then, please. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm going through the ordinance, then. I'm looking at Objective 14.1 as written. And there's the word here that says to eliminate inappropriate and unsafe development. What is the definition and who makes the determination of the word "inappropriate"? MS. HANSEN: So I'm actually going to defer to either Mike or James on that because that language was added to the original that you saw previously, and so I did not make that change. MR. SABO: Good morning. James Sabo, Comp Planning manager. Commissioner Schmitt, that is clearly subjective language which -- we put that in there based on what the state DEO recommends that we do to change our CCME. I don't have a direct answer on who makes those decisions. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, that's wonderful of the state, but we as the county can certainly try and clarify that. I mean, inappropriate to whom and measured by what? You're right. This is -- MR. SABO: I agree, I agree, and, you know, there's a lot of "consider" and "encourage" and a lot of subjective terms and, you know, unfortunately, we have to dance with the one who brought us, I guess. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I guess I'll -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? Joe, just -- can I interrupt? It's -- I would like to see the 14.1 that we actually originally approved so that I can compare it, because I can't -- I can't make any decisions, and I don't know how any of us could without, you know, comparing what we already adopted and seeing exactly what the changes are. So do we have that? MR. KLATZKOW: Do you guys need this passed today? MR. BOSI: No. Hearing the concern of the Planning Commission, we will go back and provide for the additional level of specificity that's being added to this ordinance to the ordinance that was already approved and recommended approval from the Planning Commission so you could understand where the added specificity and the language lies. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And do you understand the confusion? When we see the underlining, we're assuming that that means that's all new, and it isn't, you know. So when we're looking at a document, it's rather confusing. And I cut Joe off, so I apologize, Mr. Chairman and Joe. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But I still would like to go through my questions, even if Page 36 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) this is going to come back, so you'll have an idea of what I'm looking at. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's fair enough. And after you do so, I think I've identified the differences, and I'll go through those. And if the Planning Commission still wants to continue this, we will. Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Under Item 1 there, and it gives a statement, but how does that -- this different -- how is this different from applying requirements of the BFE and freeboard requirements, our base flood elevation and freeboard requirements? I don't understand. Redevelopment, principal strategies, engineering solutions, we do that through our plan reviews. That's a statement of fact, but incorporated in that is our building and plan review as required by the Florida Building Codes, IBC, international building codes, and through FEMA base flood elevation, and we have freeboard requirements. I just don't understand. It's -- again, it's a statement, but there's -- should not the county clarify this in more detail if they're going to put this in the CCME? MR. SABO: Commissioner Schmitt, I don't disagree with you, and I understand your concern and your question. Again, the -- we contacted the state DEO directly. They had findings in our original submittal, the original transmittal. They wanted more clear or a little bit stronger language related to meaningful and predictable. We reviewed -- Ms. Hansen reviewed other communities that have approved CCME amendments at the state level, and we mirrored those based on what the DEO's requirements are. Now, that being said, we do have floodplain managers at the county who will, of course, apply all the state statutes and standards related to floodplain management. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. And you state that in No. 6 on there. We don't encourage it. We actually enforce it. So why not eliminate the word "encourage"? Because we enforce it. We do. MR. BOSI: And we are -- and we're simply recognizing that we don't control other local governments. We're encouraging other local governments to participate. That's simply that statement. And, one, I would say that maybe they're -- as part of our resiliency planning when we identify low-lying area, there may be some engineering solutions. There may be an approach that we could utilize to address that that's outside of base flood elevation and FEMA requirements to help mitigate the localized flooding issues. That may be the case. So it is rather open-ended. And I agree with you, Joe, but I think there are some circumstances where the BFE and the components of the building code might not be the only way that localized flooding can be addressed in individual areas. There may be other engineering solutions. There may be other things that we've identified that we would promote to address those issues. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. I'm going to go back to, under No. 2, engineering solutions that result in removal of coastal real estate property from flood zone designations established by FEMA. MR. SABO: Okay. Mr. Schmitt, I completely understand. And when we brought this to you, we also brought the private property rights. And Mr. Klatzkow said, you know, on one hand we're propping up property rights and, on the other hand, we're going to take away your property rights with respect to coastal areas. CHAIRMAN FRYER: The County Attorney may have said that, but I have said it on multiple occasions. It's a mixed message from Tallahassee. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. Again, that's -- I only say, we go back to the state and say, thank you very much, but this is not enforceable, and, you know, it gets down to the reality of there's -- we avoid, we mitigate, or we compensate, and we avoid this -- and we relocate. We force people to move out of what we deem the flood zone, and be prepared to compensate people for that. Again, this is a statement of generality that means absolutely nothing. To use a word that's being utilized a lot in the news, this is nothing but word salad. That's what it is. Page 37 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) 14.1.1, we cite this ACUNE study. Is that a proprietary program? Is that -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: That is new. That is new. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I understand, but is that proprietary? Should we -- we're citing a specific model that was independently created, my understanding, by the university. I have no idea about whether compensation was involved or contractual requirements. But is it dangerous to cite the ACUNE study in lieu of just saying best practices or some other example? MR. SABO: Understood. Commissioner, what we were specifically careful about and Ms. Hansen was careful about was available climate change and local sea rise data including, but not limited to, the NOAA and ACUNE model. So we are saying to the state DEO we're going to include these models as best available data, but we are not limiting ourselves to this specific model or this specific set of data. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. But the danger there is we cited it. And I don't know if it's proprietary. I don't know if it's what you call a -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, I don't know if it will -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: You're concerned that it's spec’ing something in? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And it's also -- we don't know if that's going to continue to be the best available data, and we've already labeled it as such, and I just -- we have no idea. Maybe another institution will come along. MR. KLATZKOW: Take it out. Just -- I agree with you. Take it out. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I mean, there's other studies out there. But the wording, you said "or similar," but I'm concerned that we're spec’ing something that now is going to be perceived as mandatory. MR. SAWYER: Understood; valid. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, it also locks that in as having -- yeah, having more -- some sort of official status, which as I said, it's not -- you know, it's not government controlled. And I'm not saying that government information is always the best, but I don't know how we would, by ordinance, lock in a source that may or may not continue to be high-quality information. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Under 14.1.4 the words "shall consider" and -- which is nice, but what if I shall not consider? What if I decide not to consider? MR. BOSI: You would be going against the ordinance that's adopted within the Growth Management Plan; therefore, you'd be in noncompliance. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I considered it. I'm just -- the vagueness of it. MR. BOSI: And you have to understand, you know, the state legislature is a political body, and sometimes there are mandates that are passed down to the locals that maybe don't have a lot of specific applications but are generated from other motivations. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, yeah. I understand. Totally understand. MR. BOSI: And I think that we deal with those on a regular basis. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I spent many years in the federal government. I fully understand lobbying and other aspects of it, yes. MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: 14.1.6, the county shall coordinate. This has to do with what Dr. Hushon brought up, I believe, and with local municipalities regarding sea level rise adoption and mitigation measures. And is there any specificity to that, or we're going to -- we're going to -- we shall coordinate? Call them on the phone and say, are you guys worried about sea level rise? Yeah. What are you doing about it? Nothing. Okay. Next. I don't know. Again, there's no meat in this. MR. BOSI: No, there's not, and I think it's a recognition. Ms. Hushon wanted us to include the southwest compact. We think that is a potential that this county may enter into, and this is informed by Policy 4.1.6, but we would not suggest to put that level of specificity within this Page 38 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) policy. But the state was looking for a statement that we would coordinate with the local -- adjoining counties and municipalities. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Within the county, we have three other municipalities: Everglades City, City of Naples, and Marco Island. All of them find this in concurrence with this, and are they wedded to the idea of sea level rise? And I understand there's storm surge. And, unfortunately, I wasn't here when they did the ACUNE -- when they gave the presentation. And the issue here is are we just addressing this to -- or is there some validity to what's being discussed here? MR. SAWYER: All right. Commissioner Schmitt, I understand the question, and this is our responsibility. The county shall. And with respect to what other jurisdictions or what other municipalities do, we don't have control over that. But our commitment in 14.1.6 is that we are going to coordinate with other municipalities related to sea level. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And is "coordinate" defined? Does that just mean we communicate with them and try to work out solutions that make sense from the perspective of all four parties here, the county and the three municipalities, or is it that required to have a joint -- you know, adopt a joint proposal? I mean, it could mean anything. And I'm concerned that we know that it doesn't mean something more specific; that it is vague. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Bosi? MR. BOSI: It is intentionally vague because we don't want to tie the hands of the Board of County Commissioners in terms of how they want to go about and if they do or do not want to enter into the compact or any future agreement. I would remind the Planning Commission that within the Growth Management Plan there is an intergovernmental coordination element where we specify the inter-coordination and the sharing of/exchange of information with jurisdictions and counties that are close by. This is just a -- this is a generalized statement that says we're going to coordinate with the adjoining municipalities and counties to find the best way to address an issue that we know that has -- that has an influence upon how we arrange our land development. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Klucik, I still have you lit up. Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: To just follow on those lines, we're reacting to a regulation passed in Tallahassee? MR. SAWYER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Again, I feel like we're just trying to do the minimum to comply with the regulations. And I'm not seeing anything proactive. I have the same concern Joe has. There's absolutely nothing specific that's going to lead to anything. So in this process that we're going through, when do we get specifics? At some point in time we couldn't manage planning in the county with those types of words. MR. BOSI: After -- after the Board hears and adopts these proposed -- these proposed amendments to the CCME, we'll have to start the study. We'll have to identify the low-lying areas, we'll have to identify strategies that will try to promote addressing the issues of localized flooding, how redevelopment can go about, how we can deal with -- with potential takings and compensation associated with that. That will all appear before the Board of County Commissioners. This is the start of the process of resiliency planning. The plan's going to be developed from staff, will be vetted with the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation upon the specificity and the actions that are being called for within resiliency plan, and the Board will ultimately make that decision. So this is -- this is the beginning of the process, and we're trying to highlight the areas where we have to focus and we have to call attention to in terms of how we go about to perform this resiliency study. And we may need to bring in some outside consultants to help us as well just Page 39 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) because the knowledge base within staff might not be adequate to address all of the different issues. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So is there a plan with dates on when different things are supposed to happen, or is this going to -- I feel like it just goes on and on. We just throw the ball back and forth and, you know, the issue is continuing to happen. Is there a schedule of when we get to the point that we actually are using the outcome of whatever this is in terms of our planning? MR. BOSI: There's not a schedule with specific dates. I would say that this is the beginning process of the -- of the resiliency planning effort of Collier County. We have to amend the Growth Management Plan to be in line with what the state wants to see, and then we have to go out and carry that community planning study over the course, and we haven't determined what -- the length of time that we will need, the resources that we're going to have to identify. We'll have to bring that project management plan to the Board of County Commissioners for some direction related to that. So we don't have -- we don't have date specifics, but this does start the clock ticking that we have to get this done within a specific time frame. And I believe it says we've got a five-year window that we have to be able to accomplish this before the next study is going to be due. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: My issue here is if the county was serious, there would be no development and no redevelopment, anything forward of the CCCL, Coastal Construction Control Line, and that's it, period, end of story. But we talk about it. I missed the presentation on the flooding. I did discuss with Judy in regards to the efficacy of the data that was used. But, regardless, we know there's low-lying areas. A lot of that was pre, probably, '50s and '60s, developments that certainly did not incorporate water management practices, best practices as incorporated by the South Florida Water Management District requirements or going through the ERP process. So we have a lot of issues that are areas in this county not because of sea level rise but, frankly, because of inadequate storm drainage and stormwater management. And -- but this is a lot of -- again, this is a lot of words, and if they were serious about it, there would be very specific requirements. And it happens -- again, you guys know my background, a former Army Corps of Engineer commander. I know the issue well, and we spend millions of dollars in the federal government, but we still allow developments in riverine and along the Mississippi River that gets flooded every year, I mean, and we pay to rebuild cities, and -- so this is just -- just another -- and I guess I'm -- Paul, as we engineers, we are frustrated by -- this is a lot of words. But, again, then we're dealing with property rights, redevelopment rights. We would have never approved any of this stuff in the Coastal High Hazard Area, or the coastal -- especially forward of the CCCL, but here we are, and we're mimicking -- as was stated, we're pretty much mimicking the statute, and as vague as the statute is, we are vague as well. MR. SABO: That's a fair statement. MR. BOSI: But I would add that the specificity will be provided for -- or much more specificity will be provided for within the plan that's going to be brought to you -- MR. SABO: Correct. MR. BOSI: -- and then you'll be able to make specific comments related to -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And we'll have to -- I used to say a 747, but I'll use a A380 to bring in all the lawyers to defend property rights. MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Be that as it may, I said my piece. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Probably just more of a comment. You know, the Coastal High Hazard Area, is that defined by FEMA? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, we define that. COMMISSIONER SHEA: We as a county define that? Page 40 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, it's partially based on old surge models, SLOSH models, other models that were used. ACUNE is probably a generation above that. But it also kind of went along there's -- yeah, there's a CCCL, and then there's the Coastal High Hazard Area where we defined only three units an acre in development, but we -- MR. BOSI: And that's one of the early strategies this county had identified related to the coastal resiliency was limiting density within the Coastal High Hazard Area to one unit below the base unit of four units per acre, and the only way that that could be increased is the affordable housing bonus. That's the only density rating system mechanisms that allows you to go beyond that three units per acre. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And for all intents and purposes if you really -- it's everything -- MR. BOSI: West. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: West of 41 almost. There's other high areas probably, but from a standpoint of west, and then southwest, if you're going out the Trail, that's -- everything west of that and Southwest of 41 is, like, the Coastal High Hard Area. And then when the Corps did its resiliency study, they kind of -- those were areas as you get higher up into the -- if you want to call it higher -- six feet, seven feet above sea level where they begin to tie in some of their structures that they were looking at, tide gates and other things that they were proposing in that resiliency study. I don't even know. Where is that now? I guess they're looking at that again because the cost-benefit ratio has changed significantly. I don't know where -- don't worry about it. MR. SABO: Mr. Chairman, if I can just clarify one statement. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. MR. SABO: Mr. Schmitt had mentioned that the statute was vague, so our amendment is vague. That's not specifically correct. We mirrored approved amendments from Indian River County as well as Lee County, so that's where Mr. Bosi had said that the specificity is tighter and more meaningful and more predictable so that we meet the DEO standard. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I've got a couple of commissioners who are lit up, but I want to ask a question first, if I may. With respect to the One Naples project, if we had had this in front of us at that time, would that outcome have been different? MR. BOSI: No. I believe the One Naples, I believe, was almost entirely out of the Coastal High Hazard Area. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, it's west of 41. MR. BOSI: But that was just a general statement, as Joe had mentioned. There's some areas that are higher. There's some areas that are lower. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But it will be constructed to meet all of the requirements of -- MR. BOSI: Oh, yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- storm surge. It will be -- and both requirements. The BFE, if you remember, that was two-story or one-story, two-story garage, frangible walls for -- so everything -- anything of value is above the BFE. And the BFE out there is, like, 13 feet if I remember now. MR. SABO: That is correct. Part of the One Naples project is west of the CCCL and part of it is east. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yeah. So I want to look specifically at Policy 14.1.1, the first sentence. So I would eliminate the word "change" and the word "rise," and end it at the word "data" and then eliminate any reference to where the data comes from. "The county shall review Page 41 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) and monitor the best available climate and local sea level data," period, because then that gives the county the flexibility to -- you know, to figure out which data they're going to look at. They're not locked into any specific source. And "all climate data," why would we limit it to just climate change data? And why would we limit it to just sea level rise data? If the sea level is not rising, then we would want to know that data, too, so there's no need to narrow it down beyond -- MR. KLATZKOW: Is that a motion? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, yes, that's a motion that we -- that that would be -- that we adopt it with that change. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, let's complete our discussion and hold that thought. Perhaps you'll make the motion, and your motion will include your amendment to the language. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, I've made the motion. Just -- I want to have that on the record. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I would second it as long as we highlight -- I don't care if we leave ACUNE in there, but I don't want to be wedded to ACUNE. So, I mean, how did you word that? It's not limited to data? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, no. "The county shall review and monitor the best availability climate and local sea level data," period. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'd like to hear from the county. Is there a second first? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would second it. You want to strike the rest of it? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let's hear from the county, please. MR. BOSI: The county doesn't have any objection if that's the recommendation the Planning Commission would like to make to the Board of County Commissioners. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Do you want to finish that thought? I had a -- I was continuing with another thought. So are you -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Are you at a change in -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I guess my question is, are we going to have other changes to this language, or is this the only change -- MR. KLATZKOW: I've got to tell you, if -- as you go through it, if you want changes, make the changes, and -- because we're going to forget at the end of this exactly what the people have talked about, what have you. I would just do this as a paragraph by paragraph at this point. There's not that many of them. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. That's what we'll do. So it's been moved and seconded to approve 14.1.1 as proposed to be amended by Commissioner Klucik. Does anyone need that proposed amendment repeated? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Is the sentence -- so ACUNE is coming out? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes, including but not limited to -- what's being eliminated as well is anything after the word "sea level data." MR. KLATZKOW: And you're also eliminating the second sentence? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, "The county shall consider," that's included. MR. KLATZKOW: That stays. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: The first sentence is the only thing I'm modifying. I'm eliminating the second half, starting with "including," and I'm eliminating the word "change" in the beginning and the word "rise" in the beginning. "The county shall review and monitor the best available climate and local sea level data," period. "The county shall consider potential effects of climate change and local sea level rise and the need to reduce flood risks," blah, blah, blah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Any further questions about this language? And I'll just say it's unfortunate that Dr. Hushon is not here, but that was her choice. Page 42 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) So we will take action on the proposed amendment to 14.1.1, and this is a motion to approve as proposed to be amended. It's been moved and seconded. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously, 6-0. Commissioner Vernon, did you vote "aye"? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, I guess I'm a little confused. We're going to follow Jeff's suggestion and go through the rest of it, right? We're not -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. We're going to go section by section. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, yeah. Then I vote in favor of Mr. Klucik's motion. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So that's passed unanimously. 14.1.2, that, if I recall correctly, was carved out of the old 14.1.1, was it not, made a free-standing policy? MS. HANSEN: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Do we have any wordsmithing that we want to do to that? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, I'd entertain a motion to approve 14.1.3 [sic] as written? COMMISSIONER SHEA: .3 or .2? CHAIRMAN FRYER: 14.1.2, I'm sorry. I misstated. Is there a motion? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I make a motion to approve as stated. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. 14.1.3. And, again, this was identical to what we acted upon in transmittal. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Can you slide that up on the overhead so we can see the 14 -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. And while you're doing it, I will say what I discovered, and staff can correct me if I'm wrong, but when I compared this to what we acted on in transmittal, 14.1.3, .4, and .5 were identical to what we had done at transmittal, and 14.1.6 was new. So it doesn't mean we can't reconsider it, but just so that everybody knows what we did last time we saw it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Which one was new then, 6? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Six is new; 14.1.6 is new, but .3, .4, .5 are all identical. As near Page 43 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) as I could tell, they were identical to what we had at transmittal. Staff, correct me if I'm wrong, please. MS. HANSEN: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Does anybody want to make a motion on 14.3, .4, .5, or do you want to divide the question? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'd make a motion to go with as written. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion on .3, .4, and .5? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Then 14.1.6 is new. Is there discussion on it? Do we need to hear anything further from staff about it? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have discussion. I mean, it's generality. I agree with Dr. Hushon in regards to her statement about the requirements but, again, I don't want to be that specific in the GMP. So I guess that will come back in regards to some kind of implementing language either through policy or LDC or whatever. But all this says is we'll coordinate. MR. KLATZKOW: We can't force the local -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. MR. KLATZKOW: -- municipalities to do anything, so I don't know what else you can do. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I agree. I mean, it's similar to our days of the old Regional Planning Council. MR. KLATZKOW: And, quite frankly, they're the ones who are going to get hit by rising sea levels first, but... CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Is there a motion on 6? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm fine with it as written, because it's general in nature and, I guess -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is that a motion? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So I make a motion to approve. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is this a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor of approving 14.1.6 as written, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. Page 44 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. And that concludes our work on the EAR for adoption. Mr. Bosi? MR. BOSI: Just a comment. I just wanted to say that the responsibility for not having the strikethrough and underline of the proposed language and the further modification, that falls upon me. Rachel Hansen has only been with our department for four months. She's been wonderful. She's shown a great acumen and determination. I don't want the Planning Commission to think that that should reflect poorly upon Rachel. That's James and my responsibility. We should have been a little bit more forthcoming and understood that that would have benefited the Planning Commission. So I just wanted to provide that clarification, because Rachel's awesome. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, thank you for being a standup guy, and we all appreciate that. And thank you, Rachel. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: James and Rachel, I wasn't beating up you, because I know what you got from the state, and it's typical of the state; it really is. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much, staff, and we're all satisfied with where we are. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Good luck in coordinating with the other communities, by the way. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. That concludes our matters under rezones and GMP amendments. So we go to old business. Is there any of that? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, new business? I think we do have one thing under new business, do we not? Nighttime meeting. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What is this night meeting? MR. BOSI: And that was a discussion that I have -- we're going to have to push that to the next meeting. We have to coordinate with our Land Development Code manager in terms of the dates that he wanted to identify and talk to the Planning Commission about. But we will put -- we will put that on the agenda for the next -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Can we provide any input to staff? I'll open with some input. I think when we have a night meeting it ought to be on the same day as a day meeting. MR. BOSI: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Does anybody else have input for staff on that? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. BOSI: And would staff also have the discretion to say if there were, say, two items on the agenda that we wanted to have the night meeting to suggest, say, a 1:00 start time? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, absolutely. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Oh, yes. MR. BOSI: If we feel that we're not going to have a full day. CHAIRMAN FRYER: By all means. (Simultaneous crosstalk.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I've taken seriously your admonition, though, that we're going to be pretty busy going forward, so I doubt that will happen. But of course, if it did come to pass. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm trying to figure out how to say this. The report on Riviera Golf Course, I'll say it, I saw a report in the news; it looks like it was pretty contentious. Is that something forthcoming? MR. BOSI: Oh, it's very contentious. I mean, you can imagine, it's a golf course that has Page 45 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) houses on either side of every golf hole. Trying to fit the golf course conversion process to that is somewhat cumbersome, and there's water management issues, and we will continue to work. It's still at the very first part of the golf course conversion portion where it's the engagement of the applicant with the community trying to find areas of compromise. It's the next phase when it gets to the conversion, it gets to the rezone, where we're going to have to actually -- they're going to have to provide, you know, the specificity towards how water management and how transportation and the other issues of great concern that have been expressed by the residents within the Riviera community will be applied. It's going to be a very contentious hearing. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So we're talking months before we see that? MR. BOSI: Months before we see it. And there was a March 7th stakeholder outreach meeting that had to be postponed and rescheduled because the 400 seats that were available within the facility that was commissioned for the neighborhood information meeting did not have the capacity for the number of people who had showed up. And Mr. Bellows was at that -- was at that outreach meeting, and there was a tremendous amount of participation from the existing homeowners. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What's next, Alico arena or something for the meeting? MR. BOSI: There's -- actually the Sports Park is the second -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Sports Park. MR. BOSI: Yes, yes. It's just the reality of the number of people who want to participate within that process. CHAIRMAN FRYER: How about the Isles of Capri? We're still getting emails on that. When do you think that will come to us? MR. BOSI: That's still another one that's in progress where we are -- you're probably not -- the Planning Commission's not before -- it's still months away. It's not before -- probably summer, midsummer, mid to late summer is when that's going to -- it's going to be a busy fall. It's going to be a busy summer, it's going to be a busy fall, and these are petitions that we know are going to have a lot of controversy, a lot of participation, and we'll handle it as appropriate, but we know it's -- MR. KLATZKOW: Until the bubble bursts, and the bubble will burst, you're going to be getting more and more of these, and then everything blows up, and you'll hear crickets. MR. BOSI: And just to reiterate that, the reason that is is everything left in the urbanized area has neighbors. And there's a -- there's a characteristic of human nature, we don't like change, and when someone proposes change close to your neighborhood, there is often a reaction of hesitancy, and that hesitancy expresses itself in a lot of different forms, and most of the times it's participation in arenas like this. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Any other new business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, public comment? Anyone wish to be heard on any matter that was not on the agenda, now would be the time. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, thank you very much. Without objection, we are adjourned. ******* Page 46 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:44 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION __________________________________________ EDWIN FRYER, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on _________, as presented _________ or as corrected __________. TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC., BY TERRI L. LEWIS, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL REPORTER, FPR-C, AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 47 of 47 5.A.b Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: 03-17-22CCPC Minutes Formatted (21835 : Meeting Minutes) 04/21/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Amendment - A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County amending Resolution No. 2011-201, Development Order 2011-05, for Hacienda Lakes, a Development of Regional Impact to modify maps H-2, H-3, H-4 and map O, by changing the Business Park and Residential Tract lines, removing references to the RV Tract and adding access points along the northern DRI boundary. The subject property consisting of 2262± acres is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and north and south of Sabal Palm Road Sections 11 through 14 and 23 through 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; and providing for transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; and providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] Meeting Date: 04/21/2022 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 03/29/2022 11:09 AM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/29/2022 11:09 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/04/2022 3:18 PM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 04/07/2022 2:15 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 04/07/2022 3:50 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 04/07/2022 4:05 PM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 04/13/2022 12:28 AM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/21/2022 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 79 DOA-PL2021002454 – Hacienda Lakes DRI Amendment Page 1 of 4 Tuesday, March 29, 2022 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2022 SUBJECT: DOA-PL20210002454 HACIENDA LAKES DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT COMPANION TO PUDA-PL20210001791 HACIENDA LAKES - NORTH AREA MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) AMENDMENT PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 7742 Alico Rd. Fort Myers, FL 33912 Applicant/ Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. Contract Purchaser: 1140 Virginia Drive Fort Washington, PA 19034 Agents: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Alexis Crespo, AICP Coleman, Yovanovich & RVI Planning + Landscape Koester, P.A. Architecture, Inc. 4001 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 300 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Ste 305 Naples, FL 34103 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Please note that there are owners of the DRI that are not part of the DOA application. REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner seeks an amendment to Resolution No. 2011-201, Development Order 2011-05, for Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact (DRI), to modify Map H-2, H-3, H-4 and Map O, by changing the “Business Park” (BP) and “Residential” (R) tract lines, removing references to the RV Tract and adding access points along the northern DRI boundary. This amendment relates to a ±144 acre area (“North Area”) within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Hacienda-Lakes DRI DOA -Staff-Report (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Amendment) DOA-PL2021002454 – Hacienda Lakes DRI Amendment Page 2 of 4 Tuesday, March 29, 2022 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is one parcel (Parcel Number 48586001022) totaling ±144 acres within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, and is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard and approximately 1,675± feet north of Hacienda Lakes Parkway (formerly The Lord’s Way) in Section 14 Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 81Attachment: Hacienda-Lakes DRI DOA -Staff-Report (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DOA-PL2021002454 – Hacienda Lakes DRI Amendment Page 3 of 4 Tuesday, March 29, 2022 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI is a large master planned project on +2,262 acres. Original MPUD approval was granted by Ordinance Number 11-41 approved on October 25, 2011. The project qualified as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) per Florida Statute and a DRI Development Order defining parameters for development was also approved by Resolution Number 2011-201, Development Order 2011-05. The MPUD/DRI allows for a maximum of 1,760 dwelling units, 327,500 square feet of commercial retail uses, 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office uses, 135 hotel rooms, 140,000 square feet of business park/educational facilities, a public school, and continuation of the “swamp” buggy attraction. This request to amend the DRI Development Order is limited to changes on four maps to reflect updated conditions and show the following requested changes: • Change the Residential (R) and Business Park (BP) tract lines in the North Area. • Remove the Recreational Vehicle (RV) tract. • Relocate potential access points on the northern boundary of the MPUD, relocate the access point along Collier Boulevard, and remove potential interconnection points between the “BP” tract and the “R” tract. The acreages of Residential and Business Park tracts and development parameters within the DRI remain unchanged. Additionally, there are no proposed changes to the densities, intensities, permitted uses, or preserve areas as approved in the DRI, other than to eliminate the alternative for Recreational Vehicle Park development in the “R” Residential designated area. STAFF ANALYSIS: This amendment to the Hacienda Lakes DRI to update Map H-2, H-3, H-4, and Map O does not affect the approved acreages, densities, intensities, permitted uses, or preservation areas, other than to eliminate the alternative for Recreational Vehicle Park development. Staff recommends approval of the DRI Development Order Amendment, as this amendment will update the DRI Maps with current conditions, incorporate interconnections to the north for potential benefits to circulation in the area, and implement proposed changes evaluated as part of the companion PUD Amendment (PL20210001791). COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed the staff report for Petition DOA-PL20210002454 on March 29, 2022. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Hacienda-Lakes DRI DOA -Staff-Report (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Amendment) DOA-PL2021002454 – Hacienda Lakes DRI Amendment Page 4 of 4 Tuesday, March 29, 2022 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward a recommendation of approval of Petition DOA-PL20210002454 to the Board of County Commissioners. Attachments: A) Draft Resolution B) Applicant’s Backup Materials 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Hacienda-Lakes DRI DOA -Staff-Report (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Amendment) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA Resolution - 032122 (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA Resolution - 032122 (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA Resolution - 032122 (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (see Map H-3 for details) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H-4 for details) FPL Easement Proposed Access Proposed Access . . �:ci�r�=='.: TECO People's Gas Main Lines . . . ' ' Collier Regional Medical Center 1 ••• ••I SABAL PALM RD Ye.ar Re■dential 2012 501km 2013 200Units 2014 200 Unitl 2015 250 lnts - 2016 250Units S,OUn,1> I I I I I Henderson Creek I/ Canal I I Sin le-Famil Multl-F.amll Rat.all 20'-'>iu 30Urvts 27.500 SF 100Units 100Unlts 150,000 SF 100Unita 100 Units 150,000 SP 100Units 150Unlts 0.0 SF 100Units 150Units 0.0 SF ◄20Units 530Units 327,500 SF Access Easement Office 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 25,000 SF 25,000 SF O.OSF 70,000 SF ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Sta • Two Yur Restdentlal Sin le-famll Multl-famll Retail 2015 25Un1> OUn>ts 25Units O.OSF 2016 25Un1> OUnits 25Units O.OSF 2017 2751.nts 100Units 175Units 0.0SF 2016 275 l.nts 100Units 175Units 0.0SF 2019 2101.k,its """""" 1261.kvts 0.0 SF 8101.hts 28"'-"ts 526Lh"lits 0 Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF '"The 135 Room hotel rs proposed to be de\eloped in Stage One, in 2014. Hacienda Lakes Map H-2 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT MBM (REVISED 02/22/2022) Offl"' 0.OSF O.OSF O.OSF 0.0SF 0.0SF 0 70,000 SF Bu.lilness P.ar1' School 0.0SF 0.0SF "40,000 SF 0.0SF 0.0SF 40,000 SF Bulineu Park Sd>ool :.n,OOOSF 919 Students 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,00'.)SF 100,00'.) SF 919 Students 140,000 SF 919 Students 1,000 2,000 _____ __,Feet 6 N Legend D Residential (R) D Project Boundary ■ Preserve Tract (P) ■Attraction Tract (A) Public ROW Reservation (ROW) OJunior Deputy (JD) ■school (S)D Commercial (C) Residential / Medical Use (R/MU: D Public Facilities Tract (EMS) ■ Business Park (BP) -Roads --TECO People's Gas Main Lines -Henderson Creek Canal -Collier County Major Roads Land Use Summarv Type Acreage Commercial" 34.16+/- "lands £ncUffllefltd by ROW'Tracl ---i.51 Attraction 47.'ZT+J. Resrdential 447.86+/- Business Park or School 35.38+/. Preserw, 1544.14+/- PUbllc FacihtY 1.33+/. Junior Deputy 21.62+/. Schoa 19.55+/- Residential/Medical Use 38.82+/. Public ROW & Easement n.01+/. Total 2262.14+/- DlXTA'NC C-ONSULTING .&. "- T T.£. .&. • PlantUflt • ViM!aliu11on ·Civil Eneineering ·Surveying & Mappin1 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA Resolution - 032122 (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Legend Proposed � Residential (R) c::J Project Boundary Ill Attraction Tra::t (A) Access 0 � Junior Deputy (JD) Public ROW Reservation (ROW) 1111 Business Park (BP) -Schoo<tSJ c=J Public Facilities Tract (EMS) c:::J Residential I Medical Use (R/MU) � Commercial (Cl 1111 Preserve Tract (P) w_ ..J .... ::, "' 00'> Ill it: 0:: • w !l :::i -Roads --TECO People's Gas Main Ules Proposed Access --Hende™>n Creek Canal --comer County Major Roads Proposed Access TECO People's Gas Main Lines Proposed RATTLESNAKE Access ,, H��-_._ # t 1/4 Mi. Support .-W Medical Border/ ·• Land Use Summarv Acreaae Commercial• 34.16+/- "Lindt &w::unwrM bY RONTraet -�.51 Attraction 47.27+/- Residential 447.86+/. Business Park or School 35.38+/- Ptesflf'IA 1544.14+/- Public FacUitv 1.33+/- Junior 21.62+/- School 19.55+/-Resldentl.UMedlcel u.e 38.82+/- Public RON & Ea&ement n.01+1-Total 2262.14+/-• Year Rulden1Sal Sin le.famll 2012 50Units 20Units 2013 200 Unts 100 Unt• 201◄ 200Units 100 l.nts 2015 2!50Unita-100 Urits 2018 250 Unts 100 Units 950 Unts •20 Units MuUl�amll 30Un1S 100 lJn1S 100 lJ<m 150 Units 150 Units 530 Urits FPL Easement R PF Henderson Creek Canal PRO�RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. EXT. --------- C C FPL Easement Collier Regional Medical Center • -"'- Offloe Bu■neu Park O.OSF O.OSF 20,000SF O.OSF 25,000SF 40,000SF 25.000SF O.OSF O.OSF O.OSF 70,000SF 40,000 SF School ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Sta • Two Year Ruldenllal Slngle�amll Multi�amll Retall 2015 25Units Olk,ta 251.nts 0.OSF 2018 20Units OUnits 20 Urits 0.OSF 2017 275 Unts 100 Units 175 Llnlts 0.OSF 2018 275Units 100 Urits 175 Units 0.OSF 2010 21OUnits 84Units 126 Units O.OSF 810 Ur.ts '"""""526 U<m 0 Totals.: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056Unlts 327,500 SF "The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be c1e ... 1oped in Stage One, in 201◄. Hacienda Lakes Map H-3 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" (REVISED 02/22/2022) Offloe 0.OSF 0.OSF 0.OSF 0.OSF O.OSF 0 7O,000SF Bu■neu Park School 20,COOSF 919Students 20,COOSF 20.COOSF 20,COOSF 20,000 SF 100.000 SF 919 Students 1◄0,000 SF 111Students 400 800 Feet Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H-4 for details) R R Proposed Access o,xrA"c CONSUL TING .&.'-T T.L ..11.. •Plannint •Visu:ili1.:11ion ·Civil EntineerinJ ·Surveying & M�ina ► 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA Resolution - 032122 (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order ◄◄c----Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (see Map H-3 for details) R Access Easement Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Totals.: Residential 50 UMo 200 Units 200Units 250 Units 250 Units 950 Units Residential 25 Units 25 Units 275 Units 275 Units 210 Units 810Units 1760 Units Legend Layer D Project Boundary .. Preserve Tract (P) Public ROW Reservation Rural (ROW) Residential (R) --Collier County Roads ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage One Sinale-Famllv Multi..famil Retail Office 20Units 30Units 27,500 SF 0.0SF 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF• 25,000 SF 100 Units 150Units 0.0SF 25,000 SF 100Units 150 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 420 Units 530Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage Two Slnale-Famllv Multi-Family Retail Office 0 Units 25 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 0 Units 25 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 100Units 175 Units 0.0SF 0.0 SF 100Units 175 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 84 Units 126 Units 0.0SF 0.0 SF 284 l.JM& 5261.km 0 0 704 Units 1,056 Units 3Z7,500 SF 70,000 SF Busine• Park School 0.0SF 0.0 SF 40,000 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 40,000 SF Buslne• Park School 20,000 SF 919 Students 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 100,000 SF 919 Students 140,000 SF 919 Students "The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be dewloped in Stage One, in 2014. ROW SABAL PALM RO Access Easement R Hacienda Lakes o Map H-4 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" (REVISED 02/22/2022) 800 1,600 Feel 6 N Land Use Summary Tvoa Acreage Commercial* 34.16+/- "Land& Encurrbered by RON Tract .. 2.51 Attraction 47.27+/- Resider.itial 447.86+/- Business Park or School 35.38+/- Preser-.e 1544.14+/- Public Facility 1.33+/- Junior Del"ll llv 21.62+/- School 19.55+/- ResidentiaVMedical Use 38.82+/- Public ROW & Easement 72.01+/- Total 2262.14+/- Access Easement DlXTAINC. CONSULTING .&. .... ' ,.... .JI.. · Plunning • Vi�ualization • Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Path: T:\ProjKts�'05_0150.02.03_"-C.MllukH'I.OA 00\REV 03'rtaciendl_H4_�n_CX).mxd 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA Resolution - 032122 (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES PKWY (REVISED 01/20/2022) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA Resolution - 032122 (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Hacienda Lakes DRI Development Order Amendment PL20210002454 Application and Support Documents April 21, 2022 – CCPC Hearing PREPARED FOR: Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. SUBMITTED TO: Collier County Zoning Division Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 Contents COVER LETTER COMPLETED APPLICATION REQUEST NARRATIVE CURRENT DRI AND MASTER PLAN EXHIBITS REVISED DRI MASTER PLAN EXHIBITS PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WAIVER TIS WAIVER LETTER ADDRESSING CHECKLIST PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 COVER LETTER 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239.405.7777 • www.rviplanning.com September 24, 2021 REVISED JANUARY 2022 Ms. Laura DeJohn, AICP Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 RE: Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact Amendment to Map H Dear Ms. DeJohn: Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. (“Applicant”) is requesting to modify the “Business Park” and surrounding “Residential” tract lines on several maps associated with the Hacienda Lakes DRI for consistency with a proposed PUD amendment (PL20210001791). The change will accommodate the development of the remaining parcels in the DRI in a manner that meets market demand, while ensuring no net decrease to the currently approved acreages of Residential and Business Park tracts within the DRI. Additionally, no changes to approved densities, intensities, permitted uses, or pres erve areas are proposed via this application. To assist in Staff’s review of this request, please find the adopted Map H-2, Map H-3, and Map O per Resolution 2011- 201 and the proposed revised maps attached. The Request Narrative describes all changes to these maps in more detail. Staff will note the minor nature of this request, limited to realignment of the tract lines and proposed pedestrian facilities described above and for consistency with existing pedestrian facilities. In 2015 and 2016 statutory provisions in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, related to DRIs were amended to eliminate the review process for DRI amendments, which are now to be considered by local governments. Based on the changes to the Development of Regional Impact process as outlined in the Florida Statutes, a Notice of Proposed Change will not be necessary to modify the Hacienda Lakes DRI for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change will not increase the overall project density or intensity of land uses in the DR 2. The proposed change will not increase any trips onto Collier Blvd. as densities and intensities are not changing, ensuring no impact to the regional transportation network; 3. The proposed change will not have any increase in environmental impacts and no wetlands or environmentally sensitive lands are being affected; and 4. The applicant is not requesting any changes to the existing stormwater management or other development permits. Based on the above, the requested change complies with 380.06(7), F.S. It is understood the requested amendment is subject to approval by the local government through the public hearing process. The Applicant is requesting the revised Map H be heard by the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners with the companion Hacienda Lakes MPUD Amendment (PL20210001791). A waiver to the pre-application meeting requirement for this application was provided by Ray Bellows on September 22, 2021. A copy of this correspondence is attached. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | 2 of 2 B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Permitting\Collier County\PL20210002454 Hacienda Lakes DRI DOA\2nd Resubmittal\Cover Letter.docx If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (239) 850 -8525, or acrespo@rviplanning.com. Sincerely, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Alexis Crespo, AICP Vice President of Planning Enclosures cc: Jim Hepler, Toll Brothers David Torres, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Francesca Passidomo, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 COMPLETED APPLICATION 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR (check one): Chapter 3 D.1 of the Administrative Code F.S. § 380.06 and 380.0651 DRI Application for Development Approval (DRI) DRI Notice of Proposed Change (DOA) Other DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________ City: _______________ State: __________ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ______________________ Cell: __________________________ Fax: ___________________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________________________ Agent(s): _____________________________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________ City: _______________ State: __________ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ______________________ Cell: __________________________ Fax: ___________________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________________________ DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? Yes No Please provide the following information on separate sheets and attach to the application: 1.If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries. 2.If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders. 3.If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals. To be completed by staff 2/4/2015 Page 1 of 6 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order4 Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. 1140 Virginia Drive Fort Washington PA 19034 (239) 949-2304 jhepler@tollbrothers.com Alexis Crespo, AICP & Richard Yovanovich, Esq RVi Planning +Landscape Architecture & Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Dr, #305 Bonita Springs FL (239) 908-3405 (239) 850-8525 acrespo@rviplanning.com & ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com 4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 4.If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. 5.If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. 6.If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address. PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is inadequate, attach on separate page: •If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; •The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and •The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: _____________________________Section/Township/Range: _______/_______/_______ Subdivision: _________________________________________________Lot: _____________ Block: ___________ Metes & Bounds Description: __________________________________ Plat Book: _________ Page #: _________ Size of Property: _____ft. X ______ ft. = _______ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: ______ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: _____________________________Section/Township/Range: _______/_______/_______ Subdivision: _________________________________________________Lot: _____________ Block: ___________ Metes & Bounds Description: __________________________________ Plat Book: _________ Page #: _________ BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 2/4/2015 Page 2 of 6 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order48586001022 See attached legal description 144 East side of Collier Blvd. and approximately 1,675 feet north of The Lord's Way. 4 14 50 26 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 DETAIL OF REQUEST 1.Does the proposed action comply with the Collier County Growth Management Plan? Yes No If no, provide a written explanation on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 2.Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, please provide a written explanation of the hearing on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 3.If this is a NOPC application, has any portion of the DRI been: SOLD and/or DEVELOPED? If yes, please provide a written explanation on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 4.On a separate sheet attached to the application, please provide a detailed narrative statement that explains the requested action and why this action is proposed. Provide applicable supporting material and a list of all previous actions on the subject site, beginning with the original DRI/PUD approval and including all subsequent amendments. Include hearing number, hearing dates and a summary of the approved action. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at its expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. 2/4/2015 Page 3 of 6 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order4 4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: DRI Application for Development Approval (DRI) DRI Notice of Proposed Change (DOA) Other DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) Chapter 3 D.1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittals items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Project Narrative 3 Pre-application meeting notes Completed Addressing checklist (no older than 6 months) 2 Site Development Plan, 24” x 36” copy, 8 ½” x 11” copy, and one jpg copy (from DRI Development Order) An 8 ½ in. x 11 in. graphic location map of the site DRI Development Order Master Plan Legal Description 2 List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 Survey signed & sealed 4 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 3 Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 2 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 5 Completed State NOPC Form with all attachments (if amendment) Completed State ADA Form with all attachments (if original DRI) Draft DRI Development Order to address proposed change Copies of Notices sent to DEO and RPC 2 Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 School Impact Analysis Application - residential projects only (download the School Impact Analysis Application from website) 2 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement SCHOOL CONCURRENCY - If the proposed project includes a residential component, you are required to contact the School District of Collier County at 239-377-0267 to discuss school concurrency requirements. 2/4/2015 Page 4 of 6 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: Addressing: Annis Moxam Environmental Review: See Pre-Application Meeting Sign-In Sheet Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Historical Review Comprehensive Planning: See Pre-Application Meeting Sign-In Sheet Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney’s Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay Engineering: Alison Bradford Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky Other: Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months after the date of the last pre-app meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting shall be required) DRI Review (In addition to cost of rezone): $10,000.00 plus $25.00 per acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee DRI/DO Amendment: $6,000.00 plus $25.00 per acre (or fraction thereof). The acreage charge does not apply for amendments which only change the build-out date of the DO for a time period of less than 5 years. o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee o Amendments deemed to be minor in nature, that is requiring minor strike thru and underline text amendments of no more than 10 different lines of text changes in the DRI, will be capped at $13,000.00. o Any amendment which includes a map and text change will assessed the full fee (no cap) DRI Extension: $100.00 DRI Comprehensive Plan Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee: o CCPC: $925.00 o BCC: $500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review: $1,000.00 Property Owner Notifications: $1.50 Non-certified; $3.00 Certified return receipt mail (to be paid after receipt of invoice from the Zoning Services Department) Transportation Fees, if required: o Methodology Review: $500.00 o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review: $1,500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if required: [reserved] o Mitigation Fees, if applicable, are to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Review: 2/4/2015 Page 5 of 6 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 o DOA: $120.00 o DRI: $200.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 2/4/2015 Page 6 of 6 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 REQUEST NARRATIVE 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Hacienda Lakes DRI (DOA) Request Narrative Page 1 of 2 HACIENDA LAKES DRI (DOA) Request Narrative This application proposes to modify the Business Park (“BP”) boundary and remove RV uses in the northern portion the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD)/ Development of Regional Impact (DRI). No change to the total approved acreage for the BP tract is proposed. In support of the change to the BP boundary and RV uses, the following map changes are proposed: Map H-2 • Modify the Business Park (BP) and surrounding Residential (R) tract lines. • Update Street name from “The Lord’s Way,” to “Hacienda Lakes Pkwy.” • Remove references to the RV tract. • Add proposed access locations along northern MPUD boundary. • Update map revision date. Map H-3 • Modify the Business Park (BP) and surrounding Residential (R) tract lines. • Update Street name from “The Lord’s Way,” to “Hacienda Lakes Pkwy.” • Remove references to the RV tract. • Add proposed access locations along northern MPUD boundary. • Update map revision date. Map H-4 • Remove references to the RV tract. • Update map revision date. Map O • Modify the Business Park (BP) and surrounding Residential (R) tract lines. • Revise the locations of pedestrian facilities within the R tract. • Remove pedestrian facilities in the “Residential / Medical Use” tract which were previously removed from the Hacienda Lakes MPUD by HEX Decision 2021-33. • Update Street name from “The Lord’s Way,” to “Hacienda Lakes Pkwy.” • Remove references to the RV tract. • Add proposed access locations along northern MPUD boundary. • Update map revision date. In 2015 and 2016 statutory provisions in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, related to DRIs were amended to eliminate the review process for DRI amendments, which are now to be considered by local governments. Based on the changes to the Development of Regional Impact process as outlined in the Florida Statutes, a Notice of Proposed Change will not be necessary to modify the BP tract boundary on DRI Map H for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change will not increase the overall project density or intensity of land uses in the DRI, as no change to the approved density and intensity is proposed; 2. The proposed change will not increase any trips onto the roadway network, thus the change will not impact the regional transportation network; 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 3. The proposed change will not have any increase in environmental impacts and no wetlands or environmentally sensitive lands are being affected; and 4. The applicant is not requesting any changes to the existing stormwater management or other development permits. As noted above, pursuant to changes to Florida Statutes, the request is a local zoning issue and the proposed amendment does not create a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impacts, or any type of regional impact, not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency. The requested change complies with 380.06(7), F.S. which outlines the revised amendment process. It is understood the requested amendment is subject to approval by the local government through the public hearing process. The Department of Economic Opportunity in the past has found that these types of changes, because they are minor and do not increase regional impacts or negatively impact regional resources, do not require NOPC review in an attempt to streamline the process. Furthermore, the request is consistent with the changes made to the Florida Statutes, pursuant to Chapter 2018- 158 of the Florida Administrative Code, as it relates to 380.06(7), F.S. (Changes). For the reasons listed above, the Applicant respectfully requests approval of the modified Map H and Map O to delineate the new configuration of the BP tract boundary and surrounding Residential tract boundary and realign proposed pedestrian facilities. No other changes to Map H or Map O are proposed, and no revisions to adopted DRI conditions are proposed via this application. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 CURRENT DRI AND MASTER PLAN EXHIBITS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order RESOLUTION NO. 7.011-/.01 DEVELOPMENT ORDER 2011-0S A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR HACIENDA LAKES, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT LOCATED IN SECTIONS 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; WHICH WILL ALLOW 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USE, 70,000 SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE, A 135-ROOM HOTEL, 140,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK OR EDUCATIONAL FACILITY, AND CONTINUATION OF EXISTING JUNIOR DEPUTIES PASSIVE RECREATION AND EXISTING SWAMP BUGGY ATTRACTION; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on July 21, 2006, Toll-Rattlesnake, LLC, in accordance with Subsection 380.06(6), Florida Statutes, filed an Application for Development Approval (ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as Toll-Rattlesnake with Collier County (DRI- 2006-AR-10147) and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (DR! No. 06-492); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Administrative Code's DRI Rule 291-4.001(5) the Executive Director of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) administratively approved an initial 45-day sufficiency response extension, and the Regional Planning Council approved nine (9) subsequent sufficiency response extensions; and WHEREAS, on January 26 and 27,2010, Wilton Land Company, LLC obtained title to the majority portion of lands within the DRI; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 1982, Swamp Buggy Day, Inc. (now known as Swamp Buggy, Inc.) obtained title to a minor portion of the lands within the DRI; and Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-IOI47 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page I of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order WHEREAS, on December 27, 1995, Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. obtained title to a minor portion of the lands within the DRI; and WHEREAS, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC is authorized by Wilton Land Company, LLC, Swamp Buggy, Inc., and Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc., (hereinafter collectively "Owner") to continue to pursue Development of Regional Impact approval of the property subject of this Development Order. (The term Owner shall include its successors and assigns of each of the Owners); and WHEREAS, for the purposes of this Development Order, the "Owner" commitments set forth herein are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, it successors, and/or assigns. The Owner" commitments herein shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc., except to the extent it is a requirement related to the land owned by same; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2010, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, (herein "Developer"), responded to the fourth sufficiency review with a revised Application for Development Approval ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) now known as Hacienda Lakes filed with Collier County and the SWFRPC under the same review agency application reference numbers. The term Developer shall include its successors and assigns); and WHEREAS, Developer has obtained all necessary approvals from Collier County agencies, departments, and boards required as a condition to Planned Unit Development zoning, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and DRI approval; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners as the governmg body of the unincorporated area of Collier County having jurisdiction pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider Applications for Development Approval ADA) for Developments of Regional Impact; and Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-I 0 147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 2 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380 and the Collier County Zoning Ordinance have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the report and recommendations of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) and held a public hearing on the ADA on August 4,2011 and September 1, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution No. 11-32 and Ordinance No. 2011-40 which approved changes to the Comprehensive Plan as included in application No. CP-2006-11 for the property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2011-41 on October 25,2011, which rezoned the subject property to The Hacienda Lakes MPUD; and WHEREAS, the issuance of a Development Order pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, does not constitute a waiver of any powers or rights regarding title issuance of other development permits consistent herewith by the County or State; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners, at an open public hearing in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, having considered the Application for Development Approval of a Development of Regional Impact submitted by Developer; the report and recommendations of the SWFRPC; the record of the documentary and oral evidence presented to the Collier County Planning Commission; the report and recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission; the recommendations of Collier County Staff and the Environmental Advisory Council; and the record made at said hearing, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-IOI47 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 3 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The real property which is the subject ofthe ADA is legally described as set forth in Exhibit "A". 2. The application is consistent with Subsection 380.06(6), Florida Statutes, (2010). 3. The Developer submitted to Collier County, the SWFRPC, and Florida Department of Community Affairs an ADA and sufficiency responses, which are available for review at each respective agency. 4. The Developer proposes development of the Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact, as shown on the Series of Map H attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and consisting of 2262.1 0 acres, which includes: A. 1,760 residential dwelling units; B. 327,500 square feet of Gross Floor Area (GFA) of retail use (convenience, general and specialty retail); C. 70,000 square feet of GF A of professional and medical office; D. A 135-room hotel; E. 140,000 square feet GFA of Business Park or Educational Facility; F. Continuation of Junior Deputies passive recreation facilities; G. Continuation of the existing Swamp Buggy attraction, without the opportunity to include outdoor shooting ranges for firearms; H. 1,544.1 acres of preserves; 1. 19.55 acres, or less if approved by the School Board, of elementary school site to serve up to 919 students; and J. 1.3 acres of Emergency Medical site. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0 147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 4 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 5. The development is consistent with the report and recommendations of the SWFRPC submitted pursuant to Subsection 380.06(12), Florida Statutes. 6. The development shall not interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. 7. A comprehensive review of the impact generated by the development has been conducted by the appropriate County departments and agencies and by the SWFRPC. 8. The development is not in an area designated an Area of Critical State concern pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.05, Florida Statutes, as amended. 9. The development is consistent with the current land development regulations and the Growth Management Plan of Collier County, as amended. 10. The development is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in public meeting, duly constituted and assembled on this, the 25th day of October, 2011, that the Hacienda Lakes Application for Development Approval submitted by Developer is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. ENERGY The Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact will incorporate the following energy conservation features as a part of each Site Development Plan or plat approval for all phases and land uses: A. Provision of a combination bicycle/pedestrian system to be placed along public arterial and collector roads within the DR! which will connect with public and private bicycle/pedestrian systems in the DR1. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1O 147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 5 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order B. Provision of bicycle racks or bicycle storage facilities in recreational, commercial, and multi-family residential areas. C. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Developer or Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted and provided for on ADA Map O. Additionally, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract BP, the Developer shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. The location of the CAT shelters is generally depicted on ADA Map O. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stops/shelters unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County easements for the bus shelters. D. Developer and Owner shall require builders to: 1) use prevailing, practicable energy-efficient features m window design; 2) install operable windows and ceiling fans; and 3) install Energy Star qualified appliances and equipment. E. Deed restrictions, covenants, and design guidelines shall include provisions requiring compliance with G through P. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-I0147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 6 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order F. Installation of energy-efficient lighting for streets, parking areas, recreation areas, and other interior and exterior public areas. G. Use of water closets with a maximum flush of 1.6 gallons and shower heads and faucets with a maximum flow rate of 2.5 gallons per minute, or the use of the prevailing energy efficient bathroom fixtures available. H. Use of native plants, trees, and other vegetation and landscape design features in accordance with Section 4.06.05D.1.a., of the Collier County Land Development Code that reduce requirements for water, fertilizer, maintenance, and other needs shall be required. 1. Planting of native shade trees for each residential unit. 1. Planting of native shade trees to provide reasonable shade for all recreation areas, streets, and parking areas. K. Placement of trees to provide needed shade in the warmer months while not overly reducing the benefits of sunlight in the cooler months. L. Orientation of structures, as possible, to reduce solar heat gain by walls and to utilize the natural cooling effects of the wind. M. Provision for structural shading wherever practical when natural shading cannot be used effectively. N. Inclusion of porch or patio areas in residential units. O. Consideration by the project architectural review committee(s) of energy conservation measures (both those noted here and others) to assist builders and residents in their efforts to achieve greater energy efficiency in the development. P. The development will participate in Collier County's Single Stream Recycling (SSR) program. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-I0147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 7 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Q. Lighting for streets, parking, recreation and other public areas shall include energy efficient fluorescent/electronic ballasts, photovoltaics, low voltage lighting, motion sensors and/or timers on lighting and full cut-off luminaries in fixtures that comply with the International Dark-Sky Association. R. The developer shall not prohibit potential home buyers to select photovoltaic cells, solar hot water heaters, green roofs and other alternative energy or energy efficient features as an option at their own expense. The above conditions shall be reported in the annual monitoring report. S. Site development shall comply with the Florida Green Building Coalition Certification Standards or equivalent green building standards, if required of all developers by Collier County. 2. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL A. The Owner shall preserve in perpetuity the five archaeological sites 8CR556, 8CR878, 8CR881, 8CR879, and 8CR880 within Hacienda Lakes property and such sites shall be recorded as denoted AP (Archaeological Preserve) on Sheets 3-12 in the MPUD Master Plan set. Such annotation (i.e., AP, Archaeological Preserve) shall appear on all applicable plats, and development order site plans that may be proffered in the future that are within 50 feet of the five defined archaeological sites. B. In areas where the archeological sites are located in the vicinity of proposed development, a buffer or conservation easement, a minimum of 25 feet in width shall be preserved, or upon approval of County equivalent protections, such as temporary fencing or other structural barriers, shall be constructed around the archaeological sites. C. The five archaeological sites shall remain undeveloped. An access easement of 15 feet, outside the conservation easement, around the archaeological sites for Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 8 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order potential digs and further study shall be provided by the Owner upon County request at no cost to County. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. D. Historical/archeological areas shall not be used to meet preserve requirements. E. The Developer shall reasonably accommodate the Florida Division of Historical Resource's (DHR) investigation of these sites by allowing access to the archaeological sites by properly credentialed investigators, whenever such access can be reasonably accommodated. F. If any additional archaeological/historical sites are uncovered during the proposed development activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of such sites shall cease immediately, and the Owner shall contact DHR, SWFRPC and Collier County so that a state certified archaeologist can determine the significance of the findings and recommend appropriate preservation and mitigation actions, as necessary. 3. HURRICANE EV ACUATIONIFLOODPLAINS A. (1) The following supplies and equipment shall be purchased by the Developer for Collier County Emergency Management in accordance with its specifications and in some cases sole source provider and delivered in new condition, free on board (FOB) to the Collier County Emergency Services Center. 2) The following contributions shall be a one-time contribution in full mitigation of all requirements of the current project scope of the Hacienda Lakes DRI: a) Two (2) new 45kw towable portable generators with heavy duty diesel engine, sound insulated, manufactured by Godwin Pump and Generator to exactly Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-I 0147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 9 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order match the supplies, equipment, and power distribution systems approved and currently in use; or near the time of equipment acquisition by the Developer, as approved by the Collier County Emergency Management Department. This is a sole source procurement to ensure compatibility and parallel operations of generators within Collier County's existing fleet and insure the ability to provide essential emergency portable power to additional evacuation shelter spaces consumed by the increased shelter census created by the Hacienda Lakes DR1. Collier County will assume all maintenance, repair, and replacement of these generators following satisfactory acceptance by Collier County beyond the warranty period. Delivery of the first portable generator shall occur prior to the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. Delivery of the second generator shall occur at the earlier of (i) 24 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 300th residential unit within the development. b) Two (2) new enclosed utility trailers for the storage and transport of the supplies noted above. Collier County will own and maintain these trailers and augment them with other minor disaster supplies in a fashion similar to its current disaster response unit (DRU) shelter supply delivery system. These trailers shall be new, from a Collier County approved list ofvendor(s) and be at least 16 feet in length, dual axle load rated at 7,000 lbs. with trailer brakes, with laminate finish interior wall and floor finish, cabinets, shelving and load secure devices, Florida Department of Transportation approved for highway use, dropdown rear door and curbside door and extended tongue hitch length. At least one of the two trailers noted above shall include interior AC wiring, lighting, a generator connection, circuit breaker and roof mounted air conditioning to allow the empty trailer to be used for special post disaster field offices, damage assessment and relief efforts identical to the County's existing fleet of disaster supply trailers. Delivery of the utility trailers shall occur at the earlier of (i) 12 months Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 10 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 150th residential unit within the development. c) Four hundred and twenty-two (422) new military type adult folding disaster cots from a Collier County approved list of eligible vendors and approved type and style. Said cots shall be compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery systems and shall be provided at the earlier of (i) 48 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 1200th residential unit within the development. d) Seventy-two (72) new special needs disaster cots from a Collier County approved list of eligible vendors and approved type and style. Said cots shall be compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery systems and shall be provided at the earlier of (i) 36 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, or ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 900th residential unit within the development. e) All deeds to property located within Hacienda Lakes shall be accompanied by a disclosure statement in the form of a covenant stating that the property is located in a hurricane vulnerability zone, that the hurricane evacuation clearance time for Collier County or the Southwest Florida Region is high, and/or hurricane shelter spaces are limited. B. The Developer has provided off-site hurricane shelter mitigation for the Hacienda Lakes DRI per Paragraph A above pursuant to commitments made as a result of negotiations with Collier County officials. 4. STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT A. The Hacienda Lakes DRI shall require a South Florida Water Management District (SWFMD) Environmental Resource Permit for conceptual approval of the proposed Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-IOI47 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 11 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order development, for construction and operation of the proposed surface water management system, and for proposed impacts to onsite wetlands and other surface waters. B. The Owner shall procure SFWMD Water Use Permits for the proposed surface and/or groundwater withdrawals for landscape irrigation and for certain dewatering activities, as determined by the SFWMD, proposed for construction of project lakes and/or road or building foundations. C. At the time of permit application, the Owner shall provide verification that the proposed system designs will meet SFWMD criteria in effect at that time. D. During construction activities, the Developer shall employ best management practices for erosion and sedimentation control. These practices shall be included with or presented on all construction plans, and shall be subject to approval by the appropriate agencies prior to their implementation. E. Any construction silt barriers or hay bales, and any anchor soil, as well as accumulated silt, shall be removed upon completion of construction. Either the Developer or the entities responsible for the specific construction activities requiring these measures shall assume responsibility for having them removed upon completion of applicable construction. F. The final stormwater management plan shall consider, as applicable, measures to reduce runoff rates and volumes, including, but not limited to, fixed control structures, perforated pipes, and grass swale conveyances. Swales are preferred and shall be used, whenever possible, rather than closed systems. G. Any banks created along the onsite stormwater management system shall include littoral zones constructed on slopes consistent with SFWMD and Collier County requirements and shall be planted in native emergent or submergent aquatic vegetation. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-IOI47 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 12 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order H. The Developer shall conduct annual inspections of the Hacienda Lakes Master Stormwater Management System and the preserved/enhanced wetland areas on the project site so as to ensure that these areas are maintained in keeping with the final approved designs, and that the water management system is capable of accomplishing the level of stormwater storage and treatment for which it was intended. 1. The Developer shall confirm to the satisfaction of all applicable federal, state, and local review agencies, and the SFWMD, that the proposed stormwater management system will not impact habitat of any state or federally listed plant and/or animal species occurring on site, or that such impacts shall be mitigated to the benefit of regional populations of those species. 1. The Developer shall undertake a regularly (every other month) scheduled vacuum sweepmg of all common streets and parking areas within the development, The Developer shall encourage any private commercial parcel owners within the development to institute regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping of their respective streets and/or parking areas. K. In areas adjacent to retail and office uses, the Developer or the individual site developers, shall provide at least one-half inch of dry pre-treatment (retention or detention); or an equivalent alternative as determined by the appropriate regulatory agencies; in order to provide reasonable assurance that hazardous material will not enter the stormwater management system. L. Ditch and swale slopes shall be designed to minimize discharges so that these facilities may provide some additional water quality treatment prior to discharge. Treatment swales shall be planted with grass or appropriate native vegetation. M. The grassed stormwater treatment areas shall be mowed as part of the normal lawn maintenance of the development. Any debris that may accumulate in project Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 13 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order lakes, ditches or swales, or which may interfere with the normal flow of water through discharge structures and underdrain systems, shall be cleaned from the detention/retention areas on a regular basis. Any erosion to banks shall be repaired immediately. N. The best management practices matrix and techniques shall be used in the Hacienda Lakes DRI, consistent with the requirements of the SFWMD. O. Underdrain systems and grease baffles, if utilized within the Hacienda Lakes DRI, shall be inspected and cleaned and/or repaired on a regular basis. In no instance shall the period between such inspections exceed eighteen months. P. Stormwater management system maintenance requirements shall include removal of any mosquito-productive nuisance plant species (e.g., water lettuce, water hyacinth, cattails and primrose willows) from all system nodes, reaches and percolation basins, as well as from the lake littoral zones employed in the system. Q. To the extent consistent with applicable stormwater management system and environmental regulations, any isolated wading bird pools constructed in lake littoral zones shall be excavated to a depth which provides aquatic habitat for mosquito larvae predators, such as Gambusia affinis. R. The Owner shall conduct a predevelopment determination of surface water quality in the portion of the Henderson Creek Canal proximal to the Hacienda Lakes DR1. The water quality parameters of total phosphorous, total nitrogen, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zinc, copper, and common lawn care pesticides shall be analyzed by a licensed vendor on a monthly basis at two sampling locations. The water quality monitoring program shall be conducted for an approximate five month period overlapping the dry season and wet season. Hacienda Lakes, DRl-2006-AR-IOI47 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 14 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order S. Measures which will be utilized to mitigate potential adverse effects upon surface water and shallow groundwater at, and adjacent to, the Hacienda Lakes DRI will include all proven effective best management practices (BMP's) which are appropriate at this Hacienda Lakes DR1. More specifically, these shall include proper timing and minimum applications of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides on the common areas of the property. T. Best management practices shall also be utilized to mitigate any adverse impacts from stormwater runoff. These BMP's shall include utilization of detention ponds, vegetative systems such as grassed swales, and water quality inlets (e.g. oil/grit separators). U. The proposed surface water management system shall consist of 5 basins. Controlled discharge from basin 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall be to the large wetland located to the east of the property with the following exception. The remaining basin 5 is the Junior Deputy League and Swamp Buggy Basin, and this basin shall discharge to the Collier Boulevard Canal in a manner generally consistent with the existing water management permit for the Swamp Buggy and Junior Deputy League property. The following is a summary of the Best Management Practices that will be utilized to accomplish additional water quality treatment beyond what is required by SFWMD: 1. Construction Pollution Prevention Plan outlining construction techniques and maintenance practices to reduce or eliminate the sources of stormwater pollution. 11. Urban Stormwater Management Program of non-structural controls intended to improve the quality of stormwater rurIoff at the source of contaminants. lll. 50% additional stormwater runoff volume to be retained. IV. Phyto-Zones- Basins within the detention areas that provide an area for runoff into the lake to disperse, so as to allow biological pretreatment. v. Planted Littoral Zone-providing increased water quality by removing pollutant by biological uptake of nutrients and other ions. VI. Increased Flow Path-Locate inflow and outflow structures to maximize effective treatment time. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 15 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order V. Spreader Swale use as the last step in the discharge train to provide additional water quality and decrease erosion, based on energy diffusion (spreading of discharge over a grassed weir instead of discharging through a single pipe). W. The project shall not substantially adversely impact the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Negative impacts shall be avoided by following all regulations for water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation within The South Florida Water Management District Basis of Review Volume IV. The project shall also go above and beyond the water quality treatment by providing 150% of the required treatment. In addition, the project has been reduced from 0.15 cfs/acre per Collier County Ordinance 90-10 to 0.06 cfs/acre. X. Developer shall install several culverts under Sabal Palm Road to improve the sheetflow across the Road from north to south. Y. The master homeowner association, or community development district shall maintain the stormwater management system. Z. The stormwater management system of the project shall be consistent with the recommendations of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) with regard to the use of fertilizers and stormwater treatment as described in resolutions SWFRPC 07- 01 and SWFRPC 08-011, to the extent adopted by Collier County. 5. TRANSPORT A TION The following commitments shall be completed prior to the projected build-out date, or a date that may be approved extending the projected build-out date. A. The Developer shall provide efficient pedestrian and bicycle movement within and between the development's components, and to adjacent properties as reasonably deemed necessary by Collier County. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-I0147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 16 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order B. The Developer shall promote transit service through the inclusion of bus stops or other appropriate transit access points in site design, consistent with Collier County transit plans. C. The neighborhoods shall be developed with a multi-modal street system that can accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, thereby promoting alternative modes of transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. D. All residences shall be within a two radial miles of the commercial land uses. E. For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA 1. The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance"), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 17 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request.") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327, 500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site-related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, DRI -2006-AR -10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 18 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Figure 1 - Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment I Lel!end Existing Lanes/Turn lanes lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed E to QJ o co 5 u 1.!Jl ~ Q 4))~tlltl~ Florida Power Line Easement 11. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below.These improvements are site-related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved eepe eonsent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 19 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-IOI47 Bee Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 20 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Figure 2 - Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment II Lel!end 11IbExistinglanes/Turn lanes lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed 11. o u I j Florida Power Line Easement II 1. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved eepe eon sent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 21 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes DRI, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right-of-way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site-related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 22 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Figure 3 - Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment III Lel!end 11 E to QJ o co 5 u Ib Existing Lanes/Turn lanes Lanes!Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed D Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed Florida Power Line Easement NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved eepe eon sent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 23 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site- related improvement. Figure 4 - Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment IV E to QJ o co 5 u i ,. .-,...~ o. M Lel!end Existing lanes/Turn lanes lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed D Area Previously Developed D Area to be Developed V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved eepe eonsent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 24 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.95 I ) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right-of-way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right-of-way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right-of-way up to a width of 60 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be 30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 25 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Fi ure 5 - Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment V 4"IIiI llII"(I\ o l i Lel!end t. Existing lanes/Turn lanes lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed D Area Previously Developed D Area to be Developed BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS V1. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right-of-way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right-of- way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved eepe eonsent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 26 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order convey to the County a road easement for the road right-of-way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the road right-of-way easement to the County has been determined to be 30,000 per acre. Fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of the road right-of-way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site-related improvements. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 27 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Fi re 6 - Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment VI Iii 7 _ --.... R~idential Pod E U rl J-~ I L. J I J q: I. I Florida Power line Easement I If Ii, I' I II Ji IeI I: Res.identl.}1 a The Lord's, Way RJttlesnake Hammoc1 Road I L I' ' I I" r Res,identlJl Pod A r-""'~ Residential '" ..... Pod 8 ~ 1 : ~ - ..\ 1 JI 10. ... Wwt Existing Lanes/Tum Lanes l3nt!'s/lurn 13nt!'~ to be Con~ruut!'d/Rt!'Constru(lt!'d Roadwav ~m('nt Prl'Viously Construct4!d Roadway Segment to be Constructed o Ar...3 Pr.....lou~ly D......eIop..d DArt';) 10 be! 0e\'t'1Qp('d lJ VIr. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right-of-way to Collier County by road easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right-of-way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below. Hacienda Lakes, DRl-2006-AR-1 0 147 Approved eepe eonsent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 28 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Fi ure 7 - Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment VII p~o, "~ "_0.' III - - -- ...... \Residential _ I t\ Pod C ' ~ 1/ -";, ~ Re~:~ial It I I i I The Lord's Wa L J , I I( Jlj t, _ Rattlesn.ak:~mmQ~Ii.R r .. It, I I I II -~Residential Pod A I. f I Le2end 0:. [Kklins I.;ln~~/Turn lllnM lane5{Turn Lanes to be Coostru<t4MllReconstructed R03dwaV s..gment Pteviouily COO~lru'ted Ri~t of Way to be Preserved D Alea Previous/v De~oped D AI(~a to be De~lop...d r - J-, l~ j I I 1:0 l ReSld:tial ~"~ Pod B ~ I I I J: 1:11 L VII1. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right-of-way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right-of-way conveyance. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved eepe eonsent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 29 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Figure 8 - Hacienda lakes CRt - Commitment VIII i:Florida Power Line Easement I I II I~I __ _ _ r r I o Lel!end Right of Way to be Dedicated IX. As part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for and State or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site-related contributions. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved eepe eonsent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 30 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order F. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of impacted County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site-related transportation improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by donation to the County, unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1, 1 09 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DR!. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR- I 0 147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 31 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. G. DRI traffic studies identified an off-site impact at the interchange of 1-75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left-turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound (northbound) 1-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DR!. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under section 5.F. is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build-out of the DR!. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per section 5.F., of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. H. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article 5, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 32 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order this cost. The cost of State and Federal mitigation shall include land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection H. 6. VEGET ATION AND WILDLIFE/WETLANDS A. The Hacienda Lakes DRI shall preserve no less than 982.89 acres of native vegetation. B. The need for wildlife crossings and fencing designs for roadways crossing of the preserve areas shall be reviewed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ("FFWCC") as part of the ERP permit process. C. Review of State listed speCIes and habitat impacts/mitigation shall be addressed in coordination with FFWCC during the ERP permit process based on specific site plan details. At a minimum, the draft Hacienda Lakes Preserve Area Management Plan submitted on March 18, 20 ll, shall be implemented for the preserve areas shown in the master plan Exhibit "BOO. D. The Owner shall enhance the preserved wetlands and the wetland hydroperiods and shall maintain them to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, providing foraging and habitat for wading birds. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 33 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order E. The Owner shall enhance wetland and upland areas to include the hand- removal of exotic and nuisance vegetation and supplemental plantings installed in areas with greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. F. The Owner shall preserve, enhance, and place in a conservation easement the 1,544:1: acres of preserves, including approximately 73 percent (1,283:1: acres) of the wetlands on-site. In addition, 3:1: acres of SFWMD Other Surface Waters shall be enhanced and preserved, and shall be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. Approximately 982.89 acres of the preserve is required native vegetation (by Collier County), that shall be preserved, enhanced and placed in a conservation easement in favor of Collier County, but maintained by Owner. G. Prior to commencement of construction, the limits of wetland preserves shall be staked and roped to prevent encroachment by construction activities. In addition, best management practices for erosion control shall be implemented during construction of the project. Prior to commencement of construction, erosion control devices shall be installed where appropriate to control and reduce soil erosion, sediment transport, and turbidity. Such devices, which include haybale barriers, silt fencing, sediment booms, and temporary sediment traps, shall remain in place throughout the duration of construction until construction zones and surrounding areas are stabilized. H. The on-site wetland preserves shall be enhanced through exotic removal and supplemental plantings, which will result in preserves that are more suitable as foraging habitats for the listed wading birds observed on-site, as well as providing potential roosting areas. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 34 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order I. Where a minimum 15:1: foot upland buffer adjacent to wetland preserves is not feasible, structural buffers as set forth in the SFWMD's Basis for Review shall be provided. Structural buffers planted with native vegetation will be used throughout the Project along all areas that border wetland preserve areas to restrict access from the development to the preserve area. Generally, in areas where development is located adjacent to the conservation area or the property line, the structural buffer will be a 15- foot wide berm planted on the back slope with native tree, shrub, and ground cover vegetation. J. Emergent wetland acres shall be increased through the planting of littoral zones in the lakes created as part of the development. K. Enhancement of the wetland and upland preserves shall include the removal of exotic vegetation such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and downy rose myrtle. Exotic vegetation removal shall be done by hand removal. In general, the exotics shall be treated in place with an appropriate herbicide and left standing, or exotics shall be cut, the cut vegetation removed or stacked in place, and the remaining stump treated with an appropriate herbicide. Supplemental plantings of native vegetation shall be installed in areas of greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. In addition, as part of the mitigation plan, areas of degraded wetlands, including monocultures of melaleuca, shall be enhanced through the mechanical removal of exotics, grading to wetland elevations, and planting with native vegetation. The grading plan for these areas will include the establishment of marshes for wading bird foraging habitat. These marshes shall be graded to varying depths to allow the concentration of prey for wading birds at alternating times of the year as water levels seasonally rise and recede. The surface water management system shall be designed to maintain appropriate wetland hydroperiods within the enhancement areas. The wetland hydroperiods shall be maintained to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, to provide foraging for wading birds. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 35 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order L. In addition to Paragraph A above, native landscaping shall be used to meet the criteria of Sub-section 4.06.05 D.l.a., of the Collier County Land Development Code which requires 75% of the required trees and 50% of the required shrubs to be native plants. M. According to the Listed Species Management Plan (revised May 2011), the wetland and upland preserves, excluding reserved right-of-ways and access easements, will be placed in a conservation easement or equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The date(s), receiver of the easement or deed title, and record reference for each conservation easement or fee-simple donation of conservation/preservation areas filed will be provided at the time of filing to the SWFRPC and referenced in the biennial DRI report. N. Review of federal listed species and habitat impacts/mitigation shall be addressed in coordination with the USFWS during the USACOE permit process or as Section 10 reviews based on specific site plan details. At a minimum, the Hacienda Lakes Preserve Area Management Plan dated May, 2011, shall be implemented for the preserve areas shown in the master plan Exhibit "BOO and the measures recommended by the USFWS in consultation with the USACOE for conservation of the Florida panther, wood stork, red-cockaded woodpecker, eastern indigo snake, and any other federal listed species encountered will be employed to avoid and minimize the proposed project's impact on both individual animals and their habitats. The mitigation plan for unavoidable impacts to these species, including the location, management plan, and method of assurance of permanent protection and management for these listed species and proposed actions that would minimize the likelihood of adverse human/animal interactions will be reported in the Hacienda Lakes Preserve Area Management Plan and revisions thereof. O. The initial habitat restoration and preservation efforts will be conducted by the Developer prior to the anticipated deeding of the lands to the State. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 36 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order P. The Owner anticipates deeding portions of the preserves to the State in order to complement the adjacent Picayune Strand State Forest. The preserve areas would be maintained in accordance with the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit Application 100126-5) and managed to provide habitat for listed species. In the event that the transfer of ownership to the State does not occur, the responsibility of perpetual management for these conservation areas would become the responsibility of a Home Owners Association (HOA) or another similar entity. In this case, the contract of responsibility for the HOA shall include a mechanism for perpetual funding, assurances that the approved management plan would be followed, and assurances that management activities would be conducted by a qualified entity. Q. Developer shall coordinate pedestrian access and horse trails leading to and through the Picayune Strand with the owner of the Picayune Strand. 7. UTILITIES - COLLIER COUNTY WATER SEWER DISTRICT (CCWSD) INFRASTRUCTURE A. In accordance with the current Collier County 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the parties acknowledge that the Hacienda Lakes development may be located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District Boundaries, and; upon Board of County Commissioners approval of this Development Order Resolution, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance shall apply. B. Developer shall follow existing well field protection requirements identified in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) in Section 3.06.00. Developer shall show all well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development on all future site development plans (SDP), plans and plats (PPL) and any other site plan applications. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 37 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available.. D. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. E. The project shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. F. Should the Collier County Water-Sewer District determine that it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the project, the Developer shall either construct interim potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities, or shall postpone development until such time as the Collier County Water-Sewer District service capacity is available to service the project. Any interim facilities constructed by the Developer shall be constructed to Collier County Utilities Division Standards, and shall be dismantled, at the Developer's expense, upon connection to the Collier County Water-Sewer District facilities. Whether potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities are provided onsite or offsite, the Developer shall demonstrate to Collier County that adequate capacity is available at the time of final utilities plan submittal. G. Temporary septic systems may be utilized in conjunction with construction and sales offices, model homes, and rest shelters. Septic systems shall not be allowed onsite, other than for construction and sales offices, model homes and rest shelters. All temporary septic systems shall be properly abandoned and/or removed by a professional licensed to install and remove septic systems at the time when permanent or interim wastewater treatment facilities become available. H. All utility facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Ordinance 2004-31, and any amendments or successors thereto. Prior to commencement of Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 38 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order construction all design and construction documents pertaining to utility facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the CCWSD. 1) The utility facility shall include but not be limited to: all construction plans, technical specifications and proposed plats, as applicable, for the proposed water distribution systems, wastewater collection and conveyance systems, irrigation quality distribution systems and any possible on site treatment facilities. I. All potable water infrastructures shall be conveyed to the CCWSD. J. All wastewater collection and conveyance infrastructure shall be conveyed to the CCWSD. K. All customers shall be customers of the Collier County Water Sewer District. 8. EMERGENCY, POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION. A. The Developer shall meet with the Sheriff s Department prior to initial construction, and again at least every 24-months thereafter, if requested by the Sheriff, to establish programs and incorporate crime prevention measures during each phase of the site development process. Written results of any meeting(s) shall be provided as a part of the local development order application. B. Fire protection shall be provided according to existing standards or fire flow criteria promulgated by Collier County or recommended guidelines developed by the National Fire Protection Association. c. (1)In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services (EMS), the Developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. Such public facility site is identified as "PF": on Maps H-2 and H-3 of Exhibit "Boo. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 39 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 2) The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County at no cost to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. 3) The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, and such dedication shall occur at the earliest of (i) 48 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, or (ii) no later than at the time the 500th residential unit is included in a development order application (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. 4) If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this Article 8, Emergency, Police and Fire Protection, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The cost of State and Federal mitigation shall include land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 40 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order D. Facilities qualifying under the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act, Title III of 1986, and the Florida Hazardous Materials Emergency Response and Community Right to Know Act of 1988, shall file hazardous materials reporting applications in accordance with Sections 302, 303 ,304, 311, 312, or 313 thereof. Applications shall be updated annually by each reporting facility. E. Anyon-site facilities with commercial pool operations shall comply with appropriate codes and statutes including required safety measures such as chemical sensors, internal alarm systems, or emergency shutdown systems. F. During the site planning process, a utility master plan shall be developed that will address fire flow and the fire districts shall be consulted during the preparation of the plan. G. Portions of the commercial and residential developments may utilize natural gas as a source of energy. Coordination with the local fire departments shall occur for those developments through the site plan review process. H. Appropriate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies, as adopted by Collier County, shall be used when designing sites, buildings, streets, signs, landscaping and parking, and the County may submit such designs to the Sheriff s Office for comments and consideration during the County's site plan review process. I. The Developer shall coordinate with Collier County Public Utilities to ensure underground gas lines drawings are provided to the responding Fire Departments. 9. PHASING The project shall be developed in one overall phase that will include the entire development program. The phasing schedule is set forth on Exhibit "BOO, MAPS H-2 through H-4. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 4l of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 10. SOLID/HAZARDOUS/MEDICAL WASTE A. The Developer shall incorporate the solid waste demands of the project into the county solid waste management program and all development components (i.e.: residential, commercial et al) shall participate in all conservation practices such as recycling, trash compaction, and mechanical shredding. B. Any business located within the Hacienda Lakes DRI, which generates hazardous waste (as defined by Florida Statutes, Subsection 403.703(21) and Rule 17-730.030, Florida Administrative Code), shall be responsible for the temporary storage, siting and proper disposal of the hazardous waste generated by such businesses. However, there shall be no siting of hazardous waste storage facilities contrary to Collier County Zoning Regulations. C. The Project shall be bound by all applicable recycling requirements effective in Collier County at the time of the development. D. Areas within buildings where hazardous materials or waste are to be used, displayed, handled, generated or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, with adequate floor drains leading to separate impervious holding facilities which are adequate to contain and safely facilitate cleanup of any spill, leakage, or contaminated water. E. Discharge of hazardous waste effluent into the sewage system shall be prohibited unless approved by permit issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. F. All hazardous materials shall be handled, stored and applied in accordance with applicable regulations. G. All commercial uses shall meet Federal, State and local hazardous materials' compliance requirements. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 42 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order H. The local fire departments shall be informed, through the local government development order process, of any development where natural gas is to be used. I. There shall be no discharge of medical waste from medical facilities into the sewage system. J. Grease traps shall be required to comply with local and state codes. Additionally, the captured grease is to be hauled off by a licensed hauler. 11. SCHOOL SITE As set forth in a tri-party Developer Contribution Agreement, the Owner shall, no later than the issuance of the 500th residential building permit, dedicate to the District School Board of Collier County a 19.55 acre elementary school site, or less if agreed to by the School Board within the Hacienda Lakes DRI with the following characteristics: a) A school site of 19.55 developable acres, or less if agreed to by the School Board, with wetland impact mitigated on the site as approved by permitting agencies, shall be provided for within the DRI; b) Water and sewer connections shall be available at site. c) The site shall accommodate typical 900+/- student capacity elementary school, with other facility requirements such as parking, sidewalks, water management, recreational facilities and other standard facilities. d) The site shall be zoned for School use as part of the overall approval for the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD. e) The site location will be in lands designated Urban Residential Fringe in the County's Future Land Use Element, that is west of the one mile line east from County Road 951. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 43 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order f) Students residing within the project shall be within 1.5 miles of the school site. g) The Developer shall attempt to keep the school's frontage road(s) at 2 lanes for safer walking conditions. h) The school site shall have direct legal access to a public road right-of-way. i) School District acceptance of the dedication shall be contingent upon School Board approval and a satisfactory site feasibility study demonstrating that the land is suitable for the School District's intended use as an elementary school site with appropriate environmental conditions, usable acreage and direct legal access. j) It is anticipated that there will be no concurrency issues at the time of development, but the project will be subject to school concurrency at the time of site development plan review. A preliminary school impact analysis estimating the total number of students by housing type generated by the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD is estimated in the table below. Proposal: Estimated Number of Students Generated by Housing Type Dwelling Units Elementary Middle High Total Unit Type Students Single Family 704 112.64 70.40 84.48 267.52 Multifamily 1056 211.20 84.48 95.04 390.72 Mobile Home Condo/Coop 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Government Total 1760 324 155 180 658 k) The Owner shall be compensated for the school site by way of school impact fee credits as set forth in a Tri-party Developer Contribution Agreement, the amount determined upon land valuation under a mutually agreed land appraisal mechanism and valuation Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 44 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order described in such Agreement to be negotiated within two years of the approval of this development order. 1) Public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers shall be permitted to be collocated with schools. The Elementary school shall be encouraged as focal points for neighborhoods. 12. CONSISTENCY WITH THE LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. Collier County has determined that the Hacienda Lakes DRI project is consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and that the project's phasing is consistent with the County's Concurrency Management System relative to public facilities necessary to support the project. B. The project furthers the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District objectives by severing Transfer of Development Rights ("TDRs") from approximately 1 ,517 acres of lands designated Sending Lands on the FLUM. Those Sending Lands which generate the TDRs will be placed under a permanent conservation mechanism and ultimately be deeded to a public entity, if accepted by them. C. The residential density of the proposed PUD is in compliance with the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and is limited to 1,760 single- family and multi-family residential units. The overall Project gross density will not exceed 0.78 dwelling units per acre. D. Owner and Developer will implement Policy 3.1 of the FLUE through on- site well field protection measures, preservation of Natural Resource Protection Area (NRP A) lands within the Project, preservation of archaeological sites within the Project, and the safe and convenient vehicular and pedestrian movement within the Project. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 45 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order E. Owner and Developer will implement Policy 5.6 of the FLUE through the use of clustered development and utilization of the TDR program within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. F. Owner and Developer will implement Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 of the FLUE by providing for vehicular and pedestrian interconnections with off-site public roadways and adjacent greenways. Additionally, public access and roadway easements will not be vacated to preclude access to off-site private and public lands. 13. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE A. Recreational facilities and open space will include the Florida Sports Park Swamp Buggy grounds and arena, Junior Deputy passive recreational area, lakes, trails and preserves, as well as community recreation and social spaces integrated into the residential development areas. Map II locates the preserves, lakes, passive recreation site, and the attraction Swamp Buggy), but does not include open spaces within individual tracts. B. The following land uses would be permitted in the Junior Deputy Tract of the Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development: a. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and recreational uses; 11. Hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 111. Sporting and recreational camps; IV. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD designated area: v. Wetland preserves; VI. Upland preserves. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 46 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order b. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 11. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, vlewmg pIers, vlewmg platforms, educational sIgns, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non-motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 111. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; IV. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; v. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervIOus and/or impervious parking facilities; VI. Project identification and directional signage; V11. Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements; Vlll. Restrooms/bath houses: IX. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; x. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; XI. Archery and air rifle range(s). C. Public access to this Project's Preserve Tract will be consistent with the State's Management Plan, upon conveyance to a public agency. D. The Hacienda Lakes DRI will not impact a recreation trail designated pursuant to Chapter 260, F. S., and Chapter 16D-7, F.A.C. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 47 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order E. No parks and/or open space will be dedicated to the County. However, up to 1,549 acres of natural preserve area is intended to be dedicated to the State. The Hacienda Lakes DRI will provide a long-term restoration and maintenance program for its on site open space and recreation lands. F. The development of the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan through the implementation of the County's Transfer of Development Rights program (TDR). The criteria for utilizing the TDR program will address the goals of the Natural Resources Element of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan through implementation of restoration, provision for maintenance, and dedication of high quality natural areas. The lands intended to be dedicated to the State will provide for recreation opportunities and open spaces as contemplated by the local and regional policy. G. The Developer, at a minimum, shall comply with Collier County Level Of Service requirements at the time of Development Order issuance. H. As a part of the biennial monitoring process, the Developer shall identify compliance with the requirements listed above. 14. MPUD DOCUMENT There is a MPUD Document (Ordinance No. 2011-4l) approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 25, 2011, which also governs the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The Developer acknowledges that the conditions and commitments of the PUD Document also govern the development and use of property within the Hacienda Lakes DRI, even though the MPUD Document (Ordinance No. 2011-41) is specifically not made a part of this Development Order. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 48 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 15. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS A. All commitments and impact mitigating actions provided by the Owner within the Application of Development Approval (and supplementary documents) may be used to interpret specific conditions for DRI approval outlined above if officially adopted as conditions for approval. B. The Developer shall submit a biennial report on this Development of Regional Impact to Collier County, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, the Department of Community Affairs and all affected permit agencies as required in subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes. C. The development is on a one Phase schedule as set forth on Exhibit "BOO Maps H-2 through H-4. If Development Order conditions and Developer commitments incorporated within the Development Order, ADA or sufficiency round responses to mitigate regional impacts are not carried out as indicated to the extent or in accord with the timing schedules specified within the Development Order and this phasing schedule, then this shall be presumed to be a substantial deviation for the affected regional issue unless otherwise provided in 2011-139, Laws of Florida (20ll). D. If Collier County, during the course of monitoring the development, can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the Development Order have occurred or that the Development Order was based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Developer, resulting in additional substantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be deemed to have occurred. The monitoring checklist form contained in Appendix IV to the SWFRPC's official recommendations for the Hacienda Lakes DRI shall be used as a guide by Collier County in determining additional substantial regional impacts. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 49 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order E. The following land use conversions are anticipated within the DRI: 1) 1.0 residential unit equates to 2.73 Recreational Vehicle units/spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Care Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Care Units in the entire PUD). 2) Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi-family as defined in the Land Development Code. 3) Non-residential land use conversions may include: a conversion of retail allocation to office allocation at a one to one (1: 1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation; and from the hotel allocation of 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of Business Park land uses if no hotel is developed in the DR!. In no event shall the DR! exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Any land use change that would result in an aggregate project traffic impact greater than 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips shall require the filing of a Notice of Proposed Change, if required by applicable law at the time. 4) If any conversions are used, Developer shall provide written notification to SWFRPC and the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. 16. APPLICATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER A. For the purposes of this Development Order, the "Owner" commitments set forth herein are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, it successors, and/or assigns. The "Owner" commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc., except to the extent it is a requirement related to the land owned by same. The commitments may only be assigned by written notice to the Growth Management Division Administrator and confirmation that the Administrator has received such notice. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 50 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order B. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close-out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the PUD and DR!. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. 17. LEGAL ACCESS A. Access to Parcel "A," as described in Exhibit "COO of this document shall be via a new roadway easement from the Owner to the owner, successor, or assigns of Parcel A that includes Parcel Folio Numbers 00467320802, and 0046732050l that shall be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, and shall run in a north-south direction from the existing 30- foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page l800. This easement shall be recorded within 90-days of approval of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. B. Access to Parcel "B," as described in Exhibit "D" of this document, shall be via the existing roadway and ingress/egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 6222, Page l609, O.R. Book 245, page l24" and O.R. Book 287, Page l8. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1O 147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 51 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order C. No existing public access/roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude reasonable access to off-site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. 18. PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential SDP or Plat Approval in the Hacienda Lakes DRI, Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and there shall be executed and filed a Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) for such lands at that time. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including such Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), shall be attached/or applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first SDP or Plat Approval for the Hacienda Lakes DRI project. C. This Development Order states the land uses approved in gross square feet, acreage and parking (if applicable) are consistent with the statewide guidelines and standards in Chapter 380.065l, Florida Statutes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: 1. The County Manager or designee shall be the local official responsible for assuring compliance with the Development Order. 2. This Development Order shall remain in effect for l5 years from the date of adoption. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 52 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 3. The definitions contained in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, shall control the interpretation and construction of any terms of this Development order. 4. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(15)(c)3, Florida Statutes, this project is exempt from down-zoning or intensity or density reduction for a period of 15 years from the date of adoption of the Development Order, subject to the conditions and limitations of said Subsection of the Florida Statutes. 5. The Developer or its successor in title to the subject property shall submit a report biennially, commencing two years from the effective date of this Development Order, to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Department of Community Affairs. This report shall contain the information required in Section 9J-2.025(7), Florida Administrative Code. This report shall be prepared in accordance with the "DR! Monitoring Format", as may be amended, provided by the SWFRPC. Failure to submit the biennial report shall be governed by Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes. 6. Subsequent requests for development permits shall not require further review pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, unless it is found by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, after due notice and hearing, that one or more of the following is present. Upon a finding that one or more of the following is present, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County may take any action authorized by Chapter 380. 06( 19), Florida Statutes, pending issuance of an amended development order: A. A substantial deviation from the terms or conditions of this Development Order, a substantial deviation to the project development phasing schedule, a failure to carry out conditions, commitments or mitigation measures to the extent or in accord with the timing schedules specified herein, or substantial deviation from the approved development plans which Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 53 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order create a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impacts or other types of regional impacts which were not previously reviewed by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council; or B. An expiration of the period of effectiveness of this Development order as provided herein; or C. If the local government, during the course of monitoring the development, can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the Development order have occurred or that the Development Order was based on substantial inaccurate information provided by the Developer, resulting in additional substantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be deemed to have occurred. D. If Owner or Developer desires to develop "stadium, training and practice facilities for professional baseball (Group 7941)", a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval shall be processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S. or any successor statute, and this Development Order shall be amended. If state law changes such that a DRI review or other state review is no longer required, then this provision shall terminate. 7. The approval granted by this Development Order is limited. Such approval shall not be construed to obviate the duty of the Developer to comply with all other applicable local, state or federal permitting procedures, 8. It is understood that any reference herein to any governmental agency shall be construed to mean any future instrumentality which may be created or designated or successor in interest to, or which otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties of any referenced governmental agency in existence on the effective date of this Order. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 54 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9. Appropriate conditions and commitments contained herein may be assigned to or assumed by a Community Development District formed pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. 10. In the event that any portion or section of this Order is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Order which shall remain in full force and effect. ll. This Development Order shall be binding upon the County, the Owner, and the Developer, their assignees or successors in interest. 12. This Development Order shall become effective as provided by law. l3. Certified copies of this Order shall be provided to the Department of Economic Opportunity and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council as provided in Subsection 380.06(25)(g), Florida Statutes. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and favorable vote this 25th day of October, 20 l1. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By ~ W ~. FRED W. COYLE, Chair Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0 147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 55 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jldl. A 00H&i Ashton- Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use/Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A - Legal Description Exhibit B - Maps H-l through H-4 including phasing schedule Exhibit C - Access to Parcel A Exhibit D - Access to Parcel B Exhibit E - ADA Map 0 CP\1 O-CPS-O 1 022\115 Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Bee Approved 10/25/11 Page 56 of 56 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89010'42"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89011'14"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89009'39"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89011'OI"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00013'35"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00014'15"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87007'13"E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.OI008'02"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87012'28"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.Oro04'II"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87028'21 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89001'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.0IOI8'52"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89022'OO"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.OIOI4'38"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89001'58"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89001'58"W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.OI00I'15"E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89001'58"W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.0I00I'15"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89001'58"W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00051 '54 liE. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87037'31"E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.OI001'15"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87037'31 liE. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00048'00"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 1 of 4 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87031'38"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00048'II"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87028'42"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00048'45"E. ALONG SAID WEST AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87027'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00049'30"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00050'27"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87028'56"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00049'13"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87025'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87025'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00047'37"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87027'14"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00047'14"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87028'42"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87030'06"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00038'50"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00041'44"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87040'34"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00036'23"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87026'11 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00035'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87030'06"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00038'50"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87032'03"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00035'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 2 of 4 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order FRACTION; THENCE S.87033'59"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00038'51"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87037'27"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00042'40"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87040'54"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00056'29"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87034'58"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00041'32"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87041'38"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00026'32"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87033'18"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00034'02"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87028'21 liE. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88012'42"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03039'20"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88056'1O"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87007'20"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87007'13"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03018'31"E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88056'54"E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00031'35"E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89015'59"E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89057'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00037'14"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89034'43"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00041'48"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89023'00"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89022'35"E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00052'45"E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89046'12"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00049'34"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89057'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 3 of 4 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.0IOI2'08"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00059'10"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89022'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00055'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89046'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87028'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00040'10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87017'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00056'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87023'02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.Ol 000'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87028'21 liE. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 4 of 4 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Emergency ~ OperatIOn Center . EdIson ,..Ib. · · · · · CoUege -.r Lely Elementary f> . School Transit Stop Appro.;m..te Ioc.tioo or eXiSting/ 8- force main 10 be replaced with a 12" force main. Public Facilities l",...... EMS S'ation Colier County Major Road. Trar>USlop5 Colher Boule'oa'd Community Facility Subdi5trid Con___alion Onignalioo Counly ROW D InduallialSubdistrict MlXedUuAdIYilyCtr.Subdistrid RFMUD RlIOlIiving Landa RFMUD Sending Land. RFNeulr;1I DUrban RnidentlCll Subdililrict Z] Urb<ln R8$idential Fnoge Subd,slr'd MATURAl AREAS m"S,,'.F_ r{{~ Nor\.NRPA Hacienda Lakes Map H-1 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" 0.2 0.4 IMiles D\lTA" C' CONSUL IINti L ..... Planmn~ .Yi'>llillizalion Civil Enginttrin! . Survc)'in!; &. .\tappin~Ii N Prepared By: rpnes Printing Date: July 14, 2010 File: T:\Pro)8cts\200S\05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakesIAOA\ReIlO1\ HaClenda_H1_DevPlan 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order P,oposed Access ~ I Proposed Access RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD ~ I d~~~~~:;: ~ II> I TEeO People's '" .. JGasMainUnes ~ I I J I J 31 8, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict see Map H.3 for details) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District see Map H-4 for details) Legend o Residential (R) J RV Development Area (RV) D Project Boundary Preserve Tract (P) Attraction Tract (A) o Public ROW Reservation (ROW) DJunior Deputy (JD) School (S) II Commercial (C) o Residential 1 Medical Use (R/MU) o Public Facilities Tract (EMS) Business Park (BP) Roads TECO People's Gas Main Lines Henderson Creek Canal R Collier County Major Roads @ii'! MMJJj'Collier Regional Medical Center 1 SABAl PALM RD I Henderson Creek Canal ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Sta e One Yeu Relidenhl Slngle..f.amll Multl-FlJmll Retail omce BuslneiS Park School 2012 50 Units 20 Units 30 Units 27,500 SF Q,QSF Q.QSF land Use Summa 2013 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF Q.QSF Tpe Acreage 2014 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SP 25.000 SF 40,000 SF Commercial. 34.16+/. 201S 250 Units - 100 Units 150 Units 0,0 SF 25,000 SF Q,QSF 'L.aI'ldsEncurTtlered RCMITr.cl .-:2.51 201. 250 Units 100 Units 150 Units Q,QSF O.QSF Q,aSF Attraction 47.V+I- 950 Units 420 Units 530 Units 327, 500 SF 70,000 SF 40,000 SF Residential 447.86+1- Business Park or School 35.38+1- ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Preserve 1544.14+/- Sta e Two Public Facili 1.33+1- Yeu Re5ldentl.ll Slngle..f.amlly Multl-f.amll Retail Oft\,. BusinessPuk School Junior De 21.62+1- 201S 25 Unia a Units 25 Units a.OSF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 919 Students School 19.55+/- 201. 25Unia a Units 25 Units O.aSF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF Residential/Medical Use 38.82+1. 2017 275 Units 100 Unia 175 Units O.OSF 0.0 SF 20.000 SF Public ROW & Easement 72.01+1- 201. 275l.1nits 100 Units 175 Units O.OSF 0,0 SF 20,000 SF Total 2262.14+/- 201. 210 Units 84 Units 126 Units O.OSF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 810 Units 284 Units 526 Ul'llts 0 0 100,000 SF 919 Students Totals: 1760 Unlb 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 140,000 SF 919 Students Hacienda Lakes Map H-2 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT ~B~ Revised 9-7-11) 1,000 2,000 IFeet DlXTA" C CONSUL-TIN(, L ... Pl;vJllill~ .Vi..ualil31ion Ci~il En~illC'erin~ ,sun'()in~ & .\1:appinJ N Path: T:'Projectsl2OO5\Cl5_0150.02.03_HlC>4ll'Idal.-kesIA0A OOIREV 03\Hae;,.tlCIII_H2_DevPlaIl_OO.mxd 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Legend C=:J Residential (R) c=J RV Development Area (RV) c::J Project Boundary WI Atb"acbon Tract (A) Junior Deputy (JD) EJ] Public ROW Reservation (ROW) Business Park (BP) Sch"'" (5) c::J Public Facilities Tract (EMS) Residential I MedICal Use (R1MU) EI Commercial (C) Preserve Tract (P) Roads o 0:: W_ J.... 0 0'" COli 0::' W~ i J o Rural Fringe Mixed Use District see Map H-4 for details) R TEee People's Gas Main Lines Henderson Creek Canal Colher County Major Roads R BOUNDARY OF TRACT ALLOWING RV USES Proposed Access PF THE LORD'S WAY Proposed Access TECO People's Gas Main Lines Henderson Creek Canal PROP. RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. EXT. Proposed RATTLESNAKE Access ~ H~~ _..... t 1/4 Mi. Support ~ Medical Border . Commercial* LiInds EncUlTtlered by RCWTr.d Attraction Residential Business Park or School P,e,,,.,,,, Public Facility Junior Deputy Sch"'" Residential/Medea! Use Public ROO & Easement Total Acreage 34. 16+1- 2.51 47.27+1- 447.86+/- 35.38+1- 1544.14+1- 1.33+'- 21.62+/- 19.55+/- 38.82+'- 72.01+1- 2262.'4+/- FPL Easement Collier Regional Medical Center lWt<,>, f :*;;. u; r ) RLandUseSumma ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage One V...r Re5ldenaal Sin 1..f.Jmll MulU..filmll Retail 01Il~ Bu5lneuPiilrk School 2012 so Units 2OUn:ts 30 Units 27,500 SF Q.QSF O.OSF 2013 2OOUl"lIts 1OOU1"ll1$ 1COUnts 150,000 SF 20,000 SF Q.QSF 2014 200 Ums lOQUrvts l00Urits 150,000 SF- 25.000 SF 40,000 SF 2015 250 Units - 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 25,000 SF 0.0 SF 2016 250 Ul'lIts 100 Units 150Ul'lIts Q.OSF Q.OSF 0.0 SF 950 Units 420Unjts 530 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 40,000 SF ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Sta . Two Vur Ruldenhl Sin le..famll Multl-famll Retail 01Il~ BuslneS5Park 2015 25 Units o Units 25 Units O.OSF O.OSF 20,000 SF 2016 25 Units o Units 25 Units O_OSF O.OSF 20,000 SF 2017 Z75Units 100 Units 175Urlts Q.OSF Q.QSF 20,000 SF 2016 275 Units 1COUnits 175 Units Q.OSF Q.QSF 20,000 SF 2019 210 Units 84 Units 1:<.'6 Units O.OSF a.OSF 20,000 SF SID Units 2S4 Units 526 Urds 0 0 100,000 SF lotll$; 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 140,000 SF The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be dewloped in Stage One, in 2014 The optJonal290 unit RV Pant may be de-..eloped in Stage One. in 2015 School 919 Students 919 Students 919 Students 400 800 IFeet D'XTA" C ONSIIL.TING Planning .Vi'll;lli/aliun Civil EngillCffing . SUI'\It)ing &: \bPfling Hacienda Lakes Map H-3 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" Revised 9-7-11) D. N Path: T:\ProJ8cb\200S'C5_01 SO_02_ 03_Haeiendloukn'ADA OO'REV 03'i-tae"IdIUi3_OeYPliln_OO.rn~d 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict see Map H-3 for details) legend Layer D PrOject Boundary Preserve Tract (P) RV Development Area (RV) Public ROW Reservation Rural (ROW) Residential (R) Collier County Roads Access Easement ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage One Year Residential Single-Family Multi-Family Retail Office 2012 so Units 20 Units 30 Units 0. 0 SF 2013 200Urits 100 Units 100 Units 20,000 SF 2014 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 25,000 SF 2015 250 Units .. 100 Units 150 Units 25,000 SF 2016 250 Units 100 Units 150 UllIts 0.0 SF 950 Units 420 Units 530 Units 70,000 SF ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage Two Year Residential Single.family Multi-Famil Retail Office 2015 25 UMs a Units 2S Units O.OSF O.OSF 2016 25 UMs DUrits 25 Units Q.OSF 0.0 SF 2017 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units Q.OSF 0.0 SF 2018 215 Units 100 Units 175 Units 00 SF 0.0 SF 2019 210 Units 84 Units 126 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 810 Units 284 Units 526 Units 0 0 Totals: 1760 Un its 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF Business Park School O.OSF O.OSF 40,000 SF O.oSF 0.0 SF 40,000 SF BusineS6 Park School 20,000 SF 919 Students 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 100,000 SF 919 Students 140,000 SF 919 Students R land Use Summa Ty e Commercial. lands Encurrbered by RON Tract Attraction Residential Business Park or School Presel'\e Public Facility Junior Deputy School ResidentiaUMedical Use Public ROW & Easement Total SABAL PALM RD Access Easement Hacienda Lakes Map H-4 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" Revised 9-7-11) 800 1,600 Feet I Acreage 34.16+/- 2.51 47.27+/- 447.86+/- 35.38+/- 1544.14+/- 1.33+/- 21.62+/- 19.55+/- 38.82+/- 72.01+/- 2262.14+/- 6 N D\lTA" C oNSULTING f f.L ..... Phmnin~ . Visuali/.aliull Civil Engi~rin~ .Su.....c:)'jn~ & Mappill~ Path: T:\Proj&cb~'05_015Il02,03-,"lacl8ndaLaku\AOA OO'REV o:n..tKienda_H4_De~n_OO.ll'l.d 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "C" PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00059'lO"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89022'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00055'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89046'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 1 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "D" PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87028'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00040'10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87017'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00056'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87023'02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.Ol 000'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87028'21 liE. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT D Page 1 of 1 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Legend 1:1 CAT STOP/SHELTER Proposed CAT Route 4A & 48 Extension Existing CAT Route 4A & 48 I;j Existing CAT FaCility 4A g Existing CAT Facility 48 Existing CAT Route 7 Proposed Pedestrian Facilities o a: w J o ll a: w J o U EXISTING CAT ROUTE 7 TO MARCO ISLAND) Proposed Access I DEVELOPER I PROPOSED CAT I STOP/SHELTER THE LORD'S WAY SABAL PALM RD Hacienda Lakes MapO Revised 8-26-11) 500 1,000 lit N Land Use Attraction Tract Business Park. or School Commercial Preserve Tract Public Facilities Tract (EMS) 71 Junior Deputy Schooi Residentiai Tract Residential/ Medicai Use D Public ROW Reservation D\\TA"' C NSUl.TIN(. fA.. ..a.. P!;/,nnin, .Vi'lIillil;Minn Civil En~iO<<rinj:: .Suf'ic)inj; & M;o.ppin~ EXHIBIT I-E- Path: T:'Projectsl2OO5lC6_0150_02.00_H~..ndaL.ak.,"'~\Rey()5'M.ilP O,mxd 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 REVISED DRI MASTER PLAN EXHIBITS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (see Map H-3 for details) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H-4 for details) FPL Easement Proposed Access Proposed Access . . �:ci�r�=='.: TECO People's Gas Main Lines . . . ' ' Collier Regional Medical Center 1 ••• ••I SABAL PALM RD Ye.ar Re■dential 2012 501km 2013 200Units 2014 200 Unitl 2015 250 lnts - 2016 250Units S,OUn,1> I I I I I Henderson Creek I/ Canal I I Sin le-Famil Multl-F.amll Rat.all 20'-'>iu 30Urvts 27.500 SF 100Units 100Unlts 150,000 SF 100Unita 100 Units 150,000 SP 100Units 150Unlts 0.0 SF 100Units 150Units 0.0 SF ◄20Units 530Units 327,500 SF Access Easement Office 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 25,000 SF 25,000 SF O.OSF 70,000 SF ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Sta • Two Yur Restdentlal Sin le-famll Multl-famll Retail 2015 25Un1> OUn>ts 25Units O.OSF 2016 25Un1> OUnits 25Units O.OSF 2017 2751.nts 100Units 175Units 0.0SF 2016 275 l.nts 100Units 175Units 0.0SF 2019 2101.k,its """""" 1261.kvts 0.0 SF 8101.hts 28"'-"ts 526Lh"lits 0 Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF '"The 135 Room hotel rs proposed to be de\eloped in Stage One, in 2014. Hacienda Lakes Map H-2 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT MBM (REVISED 02/22/2022) Offl"' 0.OSF O.OSF O.OSF 0.0SF 0.0SF 0 70,000 SF Bu.lilness P.ar1' School 0.0SF 0.0SF "40,000 SF 0.0SF 0.0SF 40,000 SF Bulineu Park Sd>ool :.n,OOOSF 919 Students 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,00'.)SF 100,00'.) SF 919 Students 140,000 SF 919 Students 1,000 2,000 _____ __,Feet 6 N Legend D Residential (R) D Project Boundary ■ Preserve Tract (P) ■Attraction Tract (A) Public ROW Reservation (ROW) OJunior Deputy (JD) ■school (S)D Commercial (C) Residential / Medical Use (R/MU: D Public Facilities Tract (EMS) ■ Business Park (BP) -Roads --TECO People's Gas Main Lines -Henderson Creek Canal -Collier County Major Roads Land Use Summarv Type Acreage Commercial" 34.16+/- "lands £ncUffllefltd by ROW'Tracl ---i.51 Attraction 47.'ZT+J. Resrdential 447.86+/- Business Park or School 35.38+/. Preserw, 1544.14+/- PUbllc FacihtY 1.33+/. Junior Deputy 21.62+/. Schoa 19.55+/- Residential/Medical Use 38.82+/. Public ROW & Easement n.01+/. Total 2262.14+/- DlXTA'NC C-ONSULTING .&. "- T T.£. .&. • PlantUflt • ViM!aliu11on ·Civil Eneineering ·Surveying & Mappin1 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Legend Proposed � Residential (R) c::J Project Boundary Ill Attraction Tra::t (A) Access 0 � Junior Deputy (JD) Public ROW Reservation (ROW) 1111 Business Park (BP) -Schoo<tSJ c=J Public Facilities Tract (EMS) c:::J Residential I Medical Use (R/MU) � Commercial (Cl 1111 Preserve Tract (P) w_ ..J .... ::, "' 00'> Ill it: 0:: • w !l :::i -Roads --TECO People's Gas Main Ules Proposed Access --Hende™>n Creek Canal --comer County Major Roads Proposed Access TECO People's Gas Main Lines Proposed RATTLESNAKE Access ,, H��-_._ # t 1/4 Mi. Support .-W Medical Border/ ·• Land Use Summarv Acreaae Commercial• 34.16+/- "Lindt &w::unwrM bY RONTraet -�.51 Attraction 47.27+/- Residential 447.86+/. Business Park or School 35.38+/- Ptesflf'IA 1544.14+/- Public FacUitv 1.33+/- Junior 21.62+/- School 19.55+/-Resldentl.UMedlcel u.e 38.82+/- Public RON & Ea&ement n.01+1-Total 2262.14+/-• Year Rulden1Sal Sin le.famll 2012 50Units 20Units 2013 200 Unts 100 Unt• 201◄ 200Units 100 l.nts 2015 2!50Unita-100 Urits 2018 250 Unts 100 Units 950 Unts •20 Units MuUl�amll 30Un1S 100 lJn1S 100 lJ<m 150 Units 150 Units 530 Urits FPL Easement R PF Henderson Creek Canal PRO�RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. EXT. --------- C C FPL Easement Collier Regional Medical Center • -"'- Offloe Bu■neu Park O.OSF O.OSF 20,000SF O.OSF 25,000SF 40,000SF 25.000SF O.OSF O.OSF O.OSF 70,000SF 40,000 SF School ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Sta • Two Year Ruldenllal Slngle�amll Multi�amll Retall 2015 25Units Olk,ta 251.nts 0.OSF 2018 20Units OUnits 20 Urits 0.OSF 2017 275 Unts 100 Units 175 Llnlts 0.OSF 2018 275Units 100 Urits 175 Units 0.OSF 2010 21OUnits 84Units 126 Units O.OSF 810 Ur.ts '"""""526 U<m 0 Totals.: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056Unlts 327,500 SF "The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be c1e ... 1oped in Stage One, in 201◄. Hacienda Lakes Map H-3 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" (REVISED 02/22/2022) Offloe 0.OSF 0.OSF 0.OSF 0.OSF O.OSF 0 7O,000SF Bu■neu Park School 20,COOSF 919Students 20,COOSF 20.COOSF 20,COOSF 20,000 SF 100.000 SF 919 Students 1◄0,000 SF 111Students 400 800 Feet Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H-4 for details) R R Proposed Access o,xrA"c CONSUL TING .&.'-T T.L ..11.. •Plannint •Visu:ili1.:11ion ·Civil EntineerinJ ·Surveying & M�ina ► 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order ◄◄c----Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (see Map H-3 for details) R Access Easement Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Totals.: Residential 50 UMo 200 Units 200Units 250 Units 250 Units 950 Units Residential 25 Units 25 Units 275 Units 275 Units 210 Units 810Units 1760 Units Legend Layer D Project Boundary .. Preserve Tract (P) Public ROW Reservation Rural (ROW) Residential (R) --Collier County Roads ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage One Sinale-Famllv Multi..famil Retail Office 20Units 30Units 27,500 SF 0.0SF 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF• 25,000 SF 100 Units 150Units 0.0SF 25,000 SF 100Units 150 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 420 Units 530Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage Two Slnale-Famllv Multi-Family Retail Office 0 Units 25 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 0 Units 25 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 100Units 175 Units 0.0SF 0.0 SF 100Units 175 Units 0.0SF 0.0SF 84 Units 126 Units 0.0SF 0.0 SF 284 l.JM& 5261.km 0 0 704 Units 1,056 Units 3Z7,500 SF 70,000 SF Busine• Park School 0.0SF 0.0 SF 40,000 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 40,000 SF Buslne• Park School 20,000 SF 919 Students 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 100,000 SF 919 Students 140,000 SF 919 Students "The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be dewloped in Stage One, in 2014. ROW SABAL PALM RO Access Easement R Hacienda Lakes o Map H-4 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" (REVISED 02/22/2022) 800 1,600 Feel 6 N Land Use Summary Tvoa Acreage Commercial* 34.16+/- "Land& Encurrbered by RON Tract .. 2.51 Attraction 47.27+/- Resider.itial 447.86+/- Business Park or School 35.38+/- Preser-.e 1544.14+/- Public Facility 1.33+/- Junior Del"ll llv 21.62+/- School 19.55+/- ResidentiaVMedical Use 38.82+/- Public ROW & Easement 72.01+/- Total 2262.14+/- Access Easement DlXTAINC. CONSULTING .&. .... ' ,.... .JI.. · Plunning • Vi�ualization • Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Path: T:\ProjKts�'05_0150.02.03_"-C.MllukH'I.OA 00\REV 03'rtaciendl_H4_�n_CX).mxd 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES PKWY (REVISED 01/20/2022) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WAIVER 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order From:BellowsRay To:Jeremy Frantz; LauraDeJohnVEN Cc:Richard Yovanovich; Francesca Passidomo; Alexis Crespo; Jackie Larocque; BosiMichael; TempletonMark; SawyerMichael; ThomasClarkeVEN; KlopfParker; PerryDerek; CastroGabriela; AshtonHeidi; BrownCraig Subject:RE: PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PDI - process change Date:Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:42:08 PM Attachments:image001.png image006.png image007.png image008.png oledata.mso WARNING - EXTERNAL EMAIL: THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED FROM OUTSIDE WALDROP ENGINEERING. PLEASE VERIFY SENDER BEFORE OPENING ATTACHMENTS OR CLICKING ON LINKS. Hi Jeremy, Since a pre-application meeting for the PUDA was held, there is no need to hold a follow-up pre- application meeting for the companion DOA application. As a result, the DOA pre-app meeting requirement has been waived. Respectfully, Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT. From: Jeremy Frantz <Jeremy.Frantz@waldropengineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 6:39 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Richard Yovanovich <ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com>; Francesca Passidomo <fpassidomo@cyklawfirm.com>; Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com>; Jackie Larocque <Jackie.Larocque@waldropengineering.com>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PDI - process change EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Ray, In addition to the PUDA application discussed below, we anticipate also submitting a DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) to show a consistent BP boundary in the DRI Master Plans. Given that we held a pre-application meeting for the PUD, are you able to provide a pre-application meeting waiver for the DOA application? Respectfully, Jeremy Frantz AICP Principal Planner/Senior Project Manager 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order jeremy.frantz@waldropengineering.com | waldropengineering.com o (239) 405-7777 | d (239) 319-0026 | c (239) 357-9580 BONITA SPRINGS | FORT MYERS | ORLANDO | SARASOTA | TAMPA 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NOTICE. Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering, P.A., you are agreeing to the following: This file/data is for informational purposes only. It is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering, P.A. for any defects or errors in this file/data. From: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 4:33 PM To: Jeremy Frantz <Jeremy.Frantz@waldropengineering.com> Cc: Richard Yovanovich <ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com>; Francesca Passidomo <fpassidomo@cyklawfirm.com>; Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com>; Jackie Larocque <Jackie.Larocque@waldropengineering.com>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PDI - process change WARNING - EXTERNAL EMAIL: THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED FROM OUTSIDE WALDROP ENGINEERING. PLEASE VERIFY SENDER BEFORE OPENING ATTACHMENTS OR CLICKING ON LINKS. Thanks for this update, Jeremy. I’m copying all who attended the 8/10 Pre App. The pre app held on 8/10 along with your rundown below satisfies the pre app needed for a PUDA. In pre-app notes, we’ll include the PUDA app and submittal requirements…. For any staff who already submitted notes to Tom, please advise him if you have changes. Mike Sawyer may have transportation thoughts or questions based on the access updates explained below. For anyone who hasn’t provided Tom notes, now is the time. Thank you, Laura Laura DeJohn, AICPCollier County Growth Management DepartmentZoning Services (Vendor)2800 North Horseshoe DriveNaples, FL 34104Desk: (239) 252-5587laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov From: Jeremy Frantz <Jeremy.Frantz@waldropengineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 2:38 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Richard Yovanovich <ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com>; Francesca Passidomo <fpassidomo@cyklawfirm.com>; Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com>; Jackie Larocque <Jackie.Larocque@waldropengineering.com>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PDI - process change 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Laura, After discussion with the team, we are going to go ahead and submit this application as a PUD Amendment as you’ve suggested. Since we are going through the full amendment process there are a couple of aspects of the application that will be slightly different than what was discussed at the pre-app so I want to run through what we expect in our submittal. After reviewing, can you please confirm that the pre-application meeting we held on 8/10 will satisfy the pre-application meeting requirement for the PUDA? Also, can you please include in the pre-application meeting notes, acknowledgement of which of the PUDA submittal requirements can be waived for our application, (e.g., Architectural renderings, Statement of Utility Provisions, Environmental Data, TIS, Historical Survey, School Impact Analysis, etc.). PUDA application expectations: Several deviations discussed during the pre-app (similar to Azure and Esplanade) At your suggestion, we will look to make these repeated deviations a part of the typical development standards for the entire PUD. Adding a provision to allow for no buffer on the northern property boundary ONLY IF a joint development plan is created with Willow Run. The R and BP parcel boundaries will be modified as previously discussed: Moving a potential access point on the northern property boundaries as shown: 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Let me know if you would like to chat briefly to make sure we are all on the same page. Thank you! Jeremy Frantz AICP Principal Planner/Senior Project Manager jeremy.frantz@waldropengineering.com | waldropengineering.com o (239) 405-7777 | d (239) 319-0026 | c (239) 357-9580 BONITA SPRINGS | FORT MYERS | ORLANDO | SARASOTA | TAMPA 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NOTICE. Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering, P.A., you are agreeing to the following: This file/data is for informational purposes only. It is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering, P.A. for any defects or errors in this file/data. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 TIS WAIVER LETTER 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order September 24, 2021 Mr. Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning Section Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Project Name: Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) Subject: TIS Waiver Request Dear Mr. Sawyer, Please accept this letter as the required Transportation Impact Statement Waiver for the proposed PUD Amendment application for the above referenced project. This letter is being provided pursuant to the pre-application meeting notes provided by Mike Sawyer, and comments received during the meeting on August 10, 2021, related to PL20210001791. A pre-application meeting waiver was provided for this DOA application on September 22, 2021 (see attached email from Ray Bellows). The proposed project is a residential development within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI. The DOA proposes modifications to the boundaries of the Business Park and Residential tracts in the PUDs “North Area” consistent with the companion PUD Amendment application (PL20210001791). No changes to the previously approved trips or uses are proposed as a part of this application. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directl y at (239) 850- 8525, or Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, LLC Alexis Crespo, AICP Senior Vice President – Planning 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 T50, R26, S14 Isles of Naples DOA 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Ordern DRI Development Order Amendment See attached. 48586001022 Hacienda Lakes - North Area Isles of Naples COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 09/23/2021 48586001022 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Ordern Waldrop Engineering, P.A. (239) 908-3405 alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com 7/13/2021 Print Map https://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=Isles of Naples&orient=PORTRAIT&paper=LETTER&minX=430441.252397193&minY=646…1/1 Isles of Naples Folio Number: 48586001022 Name: HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC Street# & Name: 3591 THE LORDS WAY Build# / Unit#: FD-2 / 1 Legal Description: HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT FD-2, LESS R/W AS DESC IN OR 5201 PG 2151, LESS OR 5456 PG 1683, LESS THAT PART 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-dateinformation, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order Print Tax Bills Change of Address $ 18,400,900 $ 0 $ 18,400,900 $ 18,400,900 $ 18,400,900 $ 18,400,900 Parcel No 48586001022 Site Address*Disclaimer 3591 THELORDS WAY Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34114 Name / Address HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD City FORT MYERS State FL Zip 33912 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 5B14 393420FD-2 15B14 14 50 26 221.59 Legal HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT FD-2, LESS R/W AS DESC IN OR 5201 PG 2151, LESS OR5456 PG 1683, LESS THAT PART OF TR FD-2 LYING WEST OF THE LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELSHOWN ON PLAT OF HACIENDA LAKES THAT IS ALSO AN ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTAND LOCATED WITHIN THE HACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVEL- OPMENT DISTRICT Millage Area 39 Millage Rates   *Calculations Sub./Condo 393420 - HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES PHASE II School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.016 6.2924 11.3084 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount  2020 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll   Property Summary Property Detail Sketches Trim Notices 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order HACIENDA LAKES DRI DOA PL20210002454 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 7/15/2021 Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=HACIENDALAK…1/2 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC Filing Information L09000067527 27-0590435 07/14/2009 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Changed: 01/27/2014 Mailing Address 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Changed: 01/27/2014 Registered Agent Name & Address TORRES, DAVID E 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Name Changed: 02/03/2012 Address Changed: 01/27/2014 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR TORRES, DAVID E 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date D . C 7/15/2021 Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=HACIENDALAK…2/2 2019 01/31/2019 2020 01/17/2020 2021 02/11/2021 Document Images 02/11/2021 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/17/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/31/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/19/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/24/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/27/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/13/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/02/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/14/2009 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 218Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9/14/21, 8:49 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLFLXIII A14…1/2 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Partnership TOLL FL XIII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Filing Information A14000000715 47-2556249 12/16/2014 FL ACTIVE LP AMENDMENT 11/13/2017 11/22/2017 Principal Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 05/01/2021 Mailing Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE ATTN: LEGAL DEPT. FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 05/01/2021 Registered Agent Name & Address UNITED AGENT GROUP INC. 801 US HIGHWAY 1 NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 33408 Address Changed: 02/05/2020 General Partner Detail Name & Address Document Number P94000082800 TOLL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY, INC. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 D . C 9/14/21, 8:49 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLFLXIII A14…2/2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2019 04/27/2019 2020 05/11/2020 2021 05/01/2021 Document Images 05/01/2021 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/11/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/27/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 09/17/2018 -- Reg. Agent Change View image in PDF format 04/27/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/13/2017 -- LP Amendment View image in PDF format 04/28/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/18/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 12/16/2014 -- Domestic LP View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…1/5 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation TOLL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY, INC. Filing Information F06000001412 57-1195213 03/06/2006 DE ACTIVE CORPORATE MERGER 10/31/2019 NONE Principal Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 01/14/2021 Mailing Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 01/14/2021 Registered Agent Name & Address UNITED AGENT GROUP INC. 801 US HIGHWAY 1 NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 33408 Name Changed: 09/13/2018 Address Changed: 02/05/2020 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title Director, Senior VP & CFO CONNOR, MARTIN P 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 D . C 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…2/5 Title Senior VP & CAO Grubb, Michael J 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Director, CEO & President Yearley, Douglas C., Jr. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Vice President & Secretary Coen, Kevin J. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Executive VP & COO Parahus, Robert 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Group President Netro, Gregory S. 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title Senior VP Barnes, Donald R. 3970 West Indiantown Road Jupiter, FL 33478 Title Division President Pfister, Fredrick W. 951 Broken Sound Parkway Suite 180 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Title Division President Merten, Steven R. 160 Cape May Avenue Ponte Vedra, FL 32081 Title Division President 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…3/5 Fanning, Brock O. 2966 Commerce Park Drive Suite 100 Orlando, FL 32819 Title Senior VP & Treasurer Ziegler, Gregg L. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP & Assistant Secretary Greenspan, Kenneth J. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Rothaus, Stacey A 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Brumfield, Steven 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Regional President Murray, Thomas J. 2557 SW Grapevine Parkway Suite 100 Grapevine, TX 76051 Title Division President Ryan, Christopher J. 9950 Princess Palm Drive Suite 330 Tampa, FL 33619 Title Division Vice President Olive, Matthew 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title Division Vice President 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…4/5 Beidle, Nathan 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title VP Moore, Stacia 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title VP Rodriguez, Yolanda S. 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 Title Assistant Vice President Smith, III, Thomas J. 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 Title Division VP O'Hara, Brian 2966 COMMERCE PARK DRIVE SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FL 32819 Title Senior VP, General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer Hoban, Timothy J 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Smith, David 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Gold, Benjamin 725 TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD SUITE 200 ORANGE, CA 92868 Annual Reports 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…5/5 Report Year Filed Date 2019 02/27/2019 2020 02/13/2020 2021 01/14/2021 Document Images 01/14/2021 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/13/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 10/31/2019 -- Merger View image in PDF format 02/27/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 09/13/2018 -- Reg. Agent Change View image in PDF format 03/16/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/02/2017 -- Merger View image in PDF format 10/30/2017 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/01/2016 -- Merger View image in PDF format 04/29/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/30/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/29/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/01/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/07/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/23/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/26/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/14/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 06/04/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/06/2006 -- Foreign Profit View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes DOA - CCPC Hearing Packet (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : PL20210002454 - Hacienda Lakes North Area DRI Development Order 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21786 : 04/21/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, to change the Business Park and Residential Tract lines, remove the RV Tract and add access points along the northern MPUD boundary; by revising development standards; and by adding deviations. The subject property, consisting of 2,262+/- acres is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and north and south of Sabal Palm Road in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] Meeting Date: 04/21/2022 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 03/29/2022 12:57 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/29/2022 12:57 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 04/07/2022 2:24 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 04/07/2022 3:52 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/11/2022 11:12 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 04/11/2022 1:09 PM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 04/13/2022 12:28 AM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/21/2022 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 240 PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 1 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2022 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20210001791 HACIENDA LAKES - NORTH AREA MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) AMENDMENT COMPANION TO DOA-PL20210002454 HACIENDA LAKES DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 7742 Alico Rd. Fort Myers, FL 33912 Applicant/ Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. Contract Purchaser: 1140 Virginia Drive Fort Washington, PA 19034 Agents: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Alexis Crespo, AICP Coleman, Yovanovich & RVI Planning + Landscape Koester, P.A. Architecture, Inc. 4001 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 300 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Ste 305 Naples, FL 34103 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Please note that there are owners of the PUD that are not part of the PUDA application. REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD/DRI), as amended, to change the Business Park and Residential Tract lines, remove the Recreational Vehicle Parks (RV) Tract, add access points along the northern MPUD boundary, revise development standards, and add deviations from standards for signs, buffers and dead-end streets related to a ±144 acre area (“North Area”) within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 2 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is one parcel (Parcel Number 48586001022) totaling ±144 acres within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, and is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard and approximately 1,675± feet north of Hacienda Lakes Parkway (formerly The Lord’s Way) in Section 14 Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 3 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI is a large master planned project on +2,262 acres. Original MPUD approval was granted by Ordinance Number 11-41 approved on October 25, 2011. The project qualified as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) per Florida Statute and a DRI Development Order defining parameters for development was also approved by Resolution Number 2011-201, Development Order 2011-05. The MPUD/DRI allows for a maximum of 1,760 dwelling units, 327,500 square feet of commercial retail uses, 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office uses, 135 hotel rooms, 140,000 square feet of business park/educational facilities, a public school, and continuation of the “swamp” buggy attraction. In 2014, the MPUD was amended by HEX Decision No. 2014-18 granting one deviation to allow one wall sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes. Also in 2014, HEX Decision No. 2014-28 was approved for an off-premises sign with maximum height of 13 feet for the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI on property at the northeast quadrant of the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection. In 2015, the MPUD was amended by HEX Decision No. 2015-06 to reduce the required secondary front yards on residential corner lots from 20 feet to 10 feet specific to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes. The MPUD was amended again in 2016 by HEX Decision No. 2016-20 to reduce the required secondary front yards on single family detached lots, zero lot line and two family/duplex corner lots; to adjust the minimum distance between multi-family principal structures; and to add four (4) deviations relating to entrance sign height and area, dead-end streets, and allowing back out parking for multifamily dwellings, only for the residential development known as Azure at Hacienda Lakes. In July 2021, a change to the MPUD was approved by HEX Decision No. 2021-33 to adjust operational characteristics required for senior housing within the Residential/Mixed Use (R/MU) Tract of the MPUD, and to add an access point to the Tract along Rattlesnake Hammock Road. This request to the amend the MPUD codifies the prior changes and proposes the five following changes related to the Hacienda Lakes North Area: • Change the Residential (R) and Business Park (BP) tract lines in the North Area of the MPUD • Remove the Recreational Vehicle (RV) tract • Revise Table I – Residential Development Standards as follows: a. Reduce single family detached side yard setbacks from 6 feet to 5 feet, however the applicable minimum distance between principal structures remains 12 feet. b. Eliminate development standards for Recreational Vehicle Parks. c. Eliminate project-specific references (Esplanade and Azure) so the previously approved reduction in the required secondary front yards on residential corner lots from 20 feet to 10 feet will apply throughout the MPUD. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 4 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 d. Add new Notes #7 and 8 to eliminate the landscape buffer along the northern property boundary and reduce setbacks along common PUD boundaries only if the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD or if agreed to by the property owner in the San Marino PUD. • Add six deviations (#14 through 19) related to signs, dead-end streets, and buffer elimination along the northern property boundary. • Relocate potential access points on the northern boundary of the MPUD, relocate the access point along Collier Boulevard, and remove potential interconnection points between the “BP” tract and the “R” tract. Excerpt from the current approved Master Plan for the North Area (Ord. 11-41) Proposed Master Plan for the North Area BP 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 5 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, known as Hacienda Lakes – North Area: North: former Cracklin’ Jacks Restaurant zoned Rural Agricultural District (A), and Willow Run Quarry zoned Willow Run RPUD which allows for 590 residential dwellings (0.98 units per acre). Pending Rezoning request PL20210001766 seeks to consolidate these properties into the San Marino PUD with a maximum of 1,321 dwellings (1.6 units per acre) East: Preserve (Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI) South: Fairway Bible Church & Milano Lakes apartments, zoned First Assembly Ministries MPUD with pending Amendment request PL20200000114 seeking 690 dwellings (10.0 units per acre) Hacienda Lakes Parkway (formerly The Lord’s Way) and Sapphire Cove single family subdivision zoned as The Lord’s Way 30 Acre RPUD and developed at 2.5 dwelling units per acre, and the Swamp Buggy Race facility zoned Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI West: Collier Boulevard Right-of-Way; LASIP Conservation Area zoned CFPUD; Club Estates single family subdivision zoned RPUD and developed at 0.18 dwelling units per acre; Naples Lakes Country Club zoned PUD and developed at 1.56 dwelling units per acre Ag MPUD Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI - Swamp Buggy Races Hacienda Lakes MPUD /DRI – North Area Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI Willow Run RPUD Ag Lido Isles RPUD RPUD Naples Lakes PUD LASIP Conservation Area CFPUD RPUD 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 6 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land-use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): This application proposes to modify the Business Park (“BP”) boundary in the northern portion the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD)/ Development of Regional Impact (DRI). No change to the total approved acreage for the BP tract is proposed. Comprehensive Planning staff finds that: 1. The proposed change will not increase the overall project density or intensity of land uses in the DRI, as no change to the approved density and intensity is proposed; 2. The proposed change will not increase any trips onto the roadway network, thus the change will not impact the regional transportation network; 3. The proposed change will not have any increase in environmental impacts and no wetlands or environmentally sensitive lands are being affected; and 4. The applicant is not requesting any changes to the existing stormwater management or other development permits. Although the project will change internal boundary lines and uses, the proposed changes will not increase impacts and will therefore continue to be consistent with the FLUE and the GMPA. Transportation Element: According to the revised PUDA document and the TIS waiver request, the proposed changes will have no net increase or decrease in the number of trips generated by this development. Based on the revised PUD and backup materials, the subject petition request can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan because there are no additional traffic impacts resulting from the proposed changes. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements of the GMP. GMP Conclusion: The PUD Amendment petition is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning Services Review.” Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The proposed PUD changes will not affect any of the environmental requirements of the PUD document (Ordinance 11-41). A minimum of 1,546.11 acres of native vegetation has been placed under preservation. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 7 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the petition. Landscaping Review: The Applicant is seeking a deviation regarding landscape buffers. See Deviation Discussion below. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD Documents and recommends approval. Zoning Services Review: This amendment to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD does not entail any change to the approved maximum residential density, number of dwellings, building heights, or square footage of nonresidential development. The shift of the location of the Business Park (BP) Tract to abut the existing Milano Lakes Apartments constitutes a change to compatibility considerations for adjacent residential development. The Business Park Tract relocation introduces commercial/industrial uses of greater intensity than the formerly designated Residential Tract abutting the existing Milano Lakes Apartments to the west. The MPUD provides a minimum yard measured from the MPUD boundaries of “N/A.” To address external compatibility, staff recommends the following change: Staff Recommendation: Update the Business Park Development Standards Table III to change the minimum yard measured from MPUD boundaries from “N/A” to 50 feet, consistent with the minimum yard applicable to Tract boundaries. Permitted uses within the Business Park Tract include: construction (special trade contractors), food manufacturing, industrial inorganic chemicals, and wholesale trade non durable goods. The PUD contains a requirement that certain uses permitted in the BP Tract must be separated from residential tracts within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD by at least 500 feet. Staff contends that this protection should extend to the neighboring residences as well and recommends the following addition in strikethrough format: Staff Recommendation: Amend Business Park Permitted Uses 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within or abutting the MPUD, 5192- 5193) The request to remove the RV Tract as an alternative to Residential use helps promote consistent and compatible development pattern with in the MPUD. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 8 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 The request to adjust the Development Standards Table to reduce single family detached side yards from 6 feet to 5 feet is acceptable to provide flexibility, given that the minimum distance of 12 feet required between principal structures is unchanged. See the Deviation section of this Staff Report for additional discussion of the proposed additional Development Standards Table Notes #7 and 8 related to eliminating the landscape buffer along the northern property boundary and reducing setbacks along common PUD boundaries only if the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD or if agreed to by the property owner in the San Marino PUD. The Master Plan is updated to indicate connection points between Hacienda Lakes MPUD and the Willow Run RPUD/San Marino PUD to the north. These interconnections are supported by staff as they have potential to improve to the area’s circulation system. Six new deviations (#14 through 19) are proposed related to signs, dead-end streets, and buffer elimination along the northern property boundary. For further information and recommendations regarding the deviations, please see the Deviation section of this Staff Report. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of developmen t proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject property is located in an area of existing and planned development. Surrounding land uses generally include existing and approved residential and mixed use planned developments. The Business Park Tract relocation introduces commercial/industrial uses of greater intensity than the formerly designated Residential Tract would have abutting the existing apartment complex to the west. Staff’s recommendation includes a condition that minimum yards of 50 feet apply to MPUD boundaries as well as tract boundaries within the MPUD, and a condition that certain uses permitted in the BP Tract must be separated by at least 500 feet from residential tracts abutting as well as within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The overall intensity of the proposed MPUD remains unchanged, so public facilities impacts are neutral. Modifications to the access points for the “BP” and “R” tracts are being proposed to reflect the reconfiguration of these tracts. The proposed interconnection points along the northern boundary could be beneficial to the overall circulation system. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 9 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the North Area. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on page 6. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed amendment to the MPUD does not change the permitted uses, however the Business Park Tract relocation introduces commercial/industrial uses of greater intensity than the formerly designated Residential Tract would have abutting the existing apartment complex to the west. Staff’s recommendation includes a condition that minimum yards of 50 feet apply to MPUD boundaries as well as tract boundaries within the MPUD, and a condition that certain uses permitted in the BP Tract must be separated by at least 500 feet from residential tracts abutting as well as within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. Proposed Deviation #18 seeks to eliminate the landscape buffer at the northern property line west of the FPL easement, provided that the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD. The deviation also seeks to eliminate the landscape buffer at the northern property line east of the FPL easement, provided that a deviation is approved for the adjacent San Marino PUD to eliminate the buffer. See the Deviation section of this Staff Report below for additional discussion on compatibility considerations and conditions. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. No changes are proposed to the required usable open space. Review for compliance with requirements will be completed at the time of SDP or PPL. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The overall intensity of the proposed MPUD remains unchanged, so public facilities impacts are neutral. Modifications to the access points for the “BP” and “R” tracts are being proposed to reflect the reconfiguration of these tracts. The overall circulation system could benefit from the proposed interconnection points along the northern boundary. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 10 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Conveyance capacity for water and wastewater services must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. Impact fees are imposed to account for public facility impacts and these will be required at time of development permitting. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The subject property is located in an area of existing and planned development. Surrounding land uses generally include existing and approved residential and mixed use planned developments. The overall intensity of the proposed MPUD remains unchanged, so there is no issue with accommodation of expansion. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed development is generally consistent with the PUD regulations contained in the LDC. There are six new deviations (#14 through 19) proposed related to signs, dead- end streets, and buffer elimination along the northern property boundary. For further information regarding the deviations, please see the Deviation section of this Staff Report. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Element and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern of the abutting properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The subject property is located in an area of existing and planned development. Surrounding land uses generally include existing and approved residential and mixed use planned developments. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 11 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 The proposed amendment to the MPUD does not change the permitted uses, however the Business Park Tract relocation introduces commercial/industrial uses of greater intensity than the formerly designated Residential Tract would have abutting the existing apartment complex to the west. Staff’s recommendation includes a condition that minimum yards of 50 feet apply to MPUD boundaries as well as tract boundaries within the MPUD, and a condition that certain uses permitted in the BP Tract must be separated by at least 500 feet from residential tracts abutting as well as within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is currently zoned MPUD and will remain as such. Interconnection is proposed with the adjacent PUD to the north, so it is not isolated nor unrelated. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing zoning district boundaries are logically drawn. This petition does not propose any change to the boundaries of the MPUD. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary; however, it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to include the proposed uses and development standards that are specific to the subject parcel. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed amendment to the MPUD does not change the permitted uses or overall intensity of development, however the Business Park Tract relocation introduces commercial/industrial uses of greater intensity than the formerly designated Residential Tract would have abutting the existing apartment complex to the west. To address the potential influences of the Business Park uses on the abutting neighborhood, the staff recommendation includes a condition that minimum yards of 50 feet apply to MPUD boundaries as well as tract boundaries within the MPUD, and a condition that certain uses permitted in the BP Tract must be separated by at least 500 feet from residential tracts abutting as well as within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The overall intensity of the proposed MPUD remains unchanged, so public facilities impacts are neutral. Modifications to the access points for the “BP” and “R” tracts are 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 12 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 being proposed to reflect the reconfiguration of these tracts. The overall circulation system could benefit from the proposed interconnection points along the northern boundary. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The overall intensity of the proposed MPUD remains unchanged, therefore drainage facilities impacts are neutral. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed PUD amendment to modify certain development standards, revise the master plan to adjust the “R” and “BP” tract boundaries as well as access points, remove the Recreational Vehicle Park (RV) Tract from the PUD and the master plan, and add six deviations related to signs, dead-end streets, and landscape buffers, subject to the specific recommendations of staff, are not anticipated to serve as a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with policies of the Growth Management Plan, so the proposed amendment can be deemed to be in alignment with public welfare 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 13 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 and not a grant of special privilege. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed changes cannot be achieved without amending the PUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The development standards including those recommended by staff will help ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. N/A – No changes to use are proposed in this PUD Amendment. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Uses proposed associated with this PUD Amendment will require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all applicable federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The overall intensity of the proposed MPUD remains unchanged, therefore impact on drainage facilities is neutral. The changes associated with this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner seeks to add Deviation Numbers 14 through 19 related to signs, dead-end streets, and buffer elimination along the northern property boundary. The deviations are listed below as 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 14 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 stated in PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner’s justification and staff analysis/recommendation for this deviation are also listed below. Deviation #14: (Entry sign height) Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Petitioners Justification: The Applicant is seeking an increase to allowable entry signage height to ensure visibility of this community in light of its distance from Collier Blvd./CR 951. Collier Blvd. is a six-lane road with a landscaped median/turn lane, posted speeds of 50 mph, and is separated from the Property by an approximately 100-foot canal right-of-way. Increased sign height is necessary to ensure visibility to passing motorists and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The deviation is also intended to allow for flexibility in the type of structure that the sign can be placed upon, such as a wall, platform, or other architectural feature that typically exceeds 8 feet in height. This deviation request is consistent with the design of adjacent communities within the overall master planned MPUD/DRI. A similar deviation request has been approved at Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes per HEX Decision 2014‐18, which allowed for a maximum sign height of 13‐feet and at Azure at Hacienda Lakes per HEX Decision 2016-20, which allowed for a maximum sign height of 10-feet. Approval of this deviation will allow for consistent signage and sizing with neighboring projects internal to the MPUD/DRI, which supports the continuity between projects and the cohesive scale of hardscape features within the overall DRI. The setbacks will meet LDC standards, thereby ensuring public health, safety, and welfare is protected. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL. Considering the distance between the Collier Boulevard travelway and the position of the entry sign relative to travelers’ views, staff finds that a taller sign will help with identifying the community along the Collier Boulevard corridor. The proposed height of 12 feet is in keeping with the height of 13 feet allowed for the Hacienda Lakes signs at the Rattlesnake Hammock Road entrance. Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #15: (Entry sign area) On April 14, 2022, the applicant provided the following underlined clarification of the requested sign area: Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs that are 64 square feet each, which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 15 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Petitioners Justification: The Applicant is requesting additional sign area to ensure visibility of this community in light of its distance from Collier Blvd./CR 951. Collier Blvd. is a six-lane road with a landscaped median/turn lane, posted speeds of 50 mph, and is separated from the Property by an approximately 100-foot canal right-of-way. Increased sign area will ensure better visibility to passing motorists and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The total combined sign area of the main entry signs will not exceed 128 square feet as shown on Exhibit E‐4 Sheet 1 of 2 and is appropriate at the proposed location at the project entrance on Collier Blvd (CR 951), a major arterial roadway. Additionally, the signs will be used to identify multiple residential developments on each sign (the Hacienda Lakes North Area development and two future planned development areas). This allowance for multiple communities on each sign is needed due to the unique characteristics of the Hacienda Lakes North Area. The main access road to this area will be a private road that will not connect to other areas of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, which differs from other entrances to the PUD. Both Hacienda Lakes Parkway and Rattlesnake Hammock are public roads that provide access to several areas throughout the PUD. In contrast, this entrance will lead only to the gated North Area, which is anticipated to be a gated residential development, and the future development areas adjacent to Collier Blvd. Allowing for signage specific to the developments of the North Area will decrease confusion for people attempting to enter other areas of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. This deviation furthers the goals of the LDC by facilitating a shared access to the public ROW for all three development areas in the Hacienda Lakes North Area. Therefore, identifying each of the communities at the public access point is appropriate. The deviation is necessary to reduce confusion for passing motorists and also allows for design flexibility to incorporate all necessary signage while also enhancing the branding of the communities. This deviation also replicates signage allowed in other areas of the County where multiple communities share entrances within larger developments and is therefore in keeping with the County residents’ experience of this application of the sign code. For example, a sign including multiple residential communities was approved within the Quail Creek Community (Quail II PUD - Ord 14-14). At the time this sign was approved no deviation was needed. The main entry signs will comply with LDC standards regarding setbacks, and design, except where a deviation is granted, and locations of the signs ensure the aesthetic intent of the sign code as well as public health, safety and welfare is upheld. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS that secondary signage is specifically for the two “R” Tract properties labeled “Future Development” that are immediately fronting and adjacent to the intersection of the entry road with Collier Boulevard, and no other signage for these two “R” Tract properties is permitted facing Collier Boulevard. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 16 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 Staff notes that listing multiple destinations on a single residential sign creates an alternative sign type, most closely resembling a directory sign which is defined in LDC Section 5.06.00.A as “a sign located at the entrance to a multiple-occupancy parcel or multiple parcels developed under a unified plan of development.” Directory signs are prohibited on residential properties and are limited to commercial properties. The applicant points to one example, Quail Creek along Immokalee Road, which has multiple neighborhoods listed on a single sign. Staff finds that the deviation as conditioned is in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., and the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the deviation as conditioned is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #16: (Boundary Marker Sign area) Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Petitioners Justification: The Applicant is requesting additional sign area to allow for design flexibility and enhance the branding of the individual communities internal to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD master planned development. The total sign area of each boundary marker sign will not exceed 32 square feet, for a total of 64 square feet as shown on Exhibit E-4 Sheet 1 of 2. The locations of the boundary markers are identified on Exhibit E-4 Sheet 1 of 2 and are appropriate at the proposed locations at the property corners of the development. Similar to the entry signs, the boundary markers are separated from Collier Blvd. by a canal and the setbacks will meet LDC standards. The increased sign square footage also allows for improved visibility along an arterial roadway, thereby ensuring public health, safety and welfare is protected. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL, considering the MPUD already has a deviation (approved Deviation #3) allowing boundary marker signage to be 15 feet in height, rather than 8 feet in height per LDC Subsection 5.06.02.B.6.b. This can be justified given the distance between the Collier Boulevard travelway and the position of the boundary marker signs relative to travelers’ views warranting a taller, and thus proportionately a larger, sign area to help with identifying the community along the Collier Boulevard corridor. The request for a corresponding increase in sign area that corresponds with the allowable increased height can be found in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3. which provides that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community,” and with LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h which provides that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #17: (Dead End Street) Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead‐end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes – North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 17 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 Petitioners Justification: The Applicant is requesting one (1) dead‐end stub at the terminus of a proposed private, local street in order to maximize the developable area in light of the geography of the property. The maximum length of the proposed dead‐end street is 150 feet and will service a maximum of 4 (four) dwelling units. The proposed design is in compliance with state and local fire safety standards, as the Collier County Fire Code permits dead ends up to 150 feet in length. This deviation allows for the maximization of development of this tract within the PUD due to the shape and physical characteristics of the parcel. This deviation is suitable to the pattern of development in the area as it reduces the amount of pavement required for a short dead-end street and maintains the development pattern of the area. Similar neighborhood design is also found in other projects within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, such as nearby Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes which has utilized a similar street design (See previously approved Deviation #12, HEX Decision 2016-20). The deviation will not impact access requirements and is accommodated by the community’s drainage, sewer, water, and other utility designs. For these reasons, the requested deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL, finding that this request to allow for a dead-end street with cul-de-sac at the terminus of a local street to serve four (4) homes will not adversely impact access requirements. The petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” per LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., and that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations” per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h. Deviation #18: (Eliminate landscape buffer) Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture-zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes – North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Petitioners Justification: The Applicant is requesting no required buffer along the northern property line to accommodate two different development scenarios. WEST OF THE FPL EASEMENT, this scenario allows for the unified development of both properties. This will require the property to the north Agricultural zoning to be rezoned to allow for a unified development plan of both properties. Future SDP or PPL submittals will be required 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 18 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 to demonstrate this unified development. If the adjacent property is not rezoned and developed as a unified development, buffers will be provided as required by this MPUD and the LDC, as applicable. EAST OF THE FPL EASEMENT, this scenario allows for the coordinated development of two separate PUDs. While it is not intended to develop these properties under a single, unified development plan, development of the properties will be coordinated to allow for the existing lakefront in the adjacent development to be expanded to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD’s northern boundary. As a result, the request facilitates the creation of lake views for properties within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. Although a unified development plan is not proposed in this area, the coordination of these two developments is evidenced by a similar deviation request in the recently submitted San Marino-Willow Run PUDR (PL20210001766). LDC Section 4.06.02.A describes the purpose of required buffers as separating residential developments from several other uses. The deviation supports this goal in the area west of the FPL easement since it facilitates the development of a unified development plan, within which, internal buffers would not be desired. Buffers will be provided in accordance with the LDC wherever this unified development plan abuts other uses. East of the FPL easement, the deviation allows for the creation of unobstructed lake views for properties within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The lake ensures a separation of approximately 900 feet or more between the residential areas in each PUD. This lake view, and the significant distance between dwellings, is an enhancement over the 10-foot Type “A” buffer that is otherwise required by the currently approved Hacienda Lakes MPUD Master Plan. The unobstructed lake views will serve the same purposes of improving the aesthetic appearance of developments in ways that harmonize the natural and built environment, reduces noise and glare, and enhances community identity, while also maximizing the physical and psychological benefits provided by the lakefront. Since both PUDs propose high-quality residential development, there are no visual aspects of the developments which must be shielded from view. In addition to maintaining the intent of the Landscape Code, this deviation maximizes the use and benefit of nearby open space amenity by not shielding properties along the northern boundary from the adjacent lakefront. For these reasons, the requested deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL WITH REVISIONS. Staff recommends the following changes in underline format: Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture-zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes – North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL, and if the unit types on either side of the PUD boundary are the same (i.e., both single family detached or both two-family, etc.); 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 19 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer and if the lake area is extended to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD’s northern boundary, and if the unit types on either side of the PUD boundary are the same (i.e., both single family detached or both two-family, etc.), as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. These clarifications are added to ensure the deviation is implemented under circumstances that are consistent with the petitioner’s justifications for the deviation. When compatible developments with similar unit types share a common boundary and separations are afforded by lake areas, relief from buffer requirements can be “waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” per LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., with the deviation “meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations” per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h. Deviation #19: (Decorative wall height) Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Petitioners Justification: The proposed wall height will allow for a decorative entry feature that provides aesthetic value to the project and compliments the entry signage design. This height is similar to approvals in nearby projects, such as San Marino and Hammock Park, and will not be out of character with the surrounding area. The wall will be setback from property lines in accordance with the LDC. The proposed design will serve to enhance public health, safety and welfare. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL. The requested wall height corresponds to the design and scale of the associated entry signs, and the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” per LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., and that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations” per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on November 18, 2021 at the Fairway Bible Church - 3855 The Lords Way Naples, FL 34114. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:00 p.m. and ended at 5:24 p.m. Jeremy Frantz, representing the applicant, provided a PowerPoint presentation and discussed the proposed PUD Amendment. Mr. Frantz explained that the proposed amendments are specific to a 144-acre residential project located in the northern area of the MPUD. He affirmed that there are no changes proposed to the allowed uses and no increase to the allowed density or intensity as part of this PUD Amendment. He described that the proposed amendment includes the re-orientation of Business Park and the Residential Tracts in the northern area, updates to the development standards including a reduced side yard setback from 6 feet to 5 feet, deviations related to signage and dead-end streets, updating access locations, and a potential unified development with Willow Run PUD to the north. Attendees primarily asked questions about the 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 20 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 intended roadway improvements, traffic concerns, and intended uses for the business park and residential tracts. The NIM documentation is included in the Applicant’s Backup Materials. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC): This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2 -1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s office on March 24, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval of PUDA Petition PL20210001791, subject to the following conditions: 1. Update the Business Park Development Standards Table III of PUD Exhibit 3 to change the minimum yard measured from MPUD boundaries from “N/A” to 50 feet, consistent with the minimum yard applicable to Tract boundaries. 2. Amend the Permitted Uses of the “BP” Business Park Tract in PUD Exhibit 2 as follows: 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within or abutting the MPUD, 5192- 5193) 3. Deviation #15 is subject to conditions that secondary signage is specifically for the two “R” Tract properties labeled “Future Development” that are immediately fronting and adjacent to the intersection of the entry road with Collier Boulevard, and no other signage for these two “R” Tract properties is permitted facing Collier Boulevard. 4. Deviation #18 is subject to the following revisions in underline format: Relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture-zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes – North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL, and if the unit types on either side of the PUD boundary are the same (i.e., both single family detached or both two -family, etc.); 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer and if the lake area is extended to 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North PUDA-PL2021001791; Hacienda Lakes – North Area PUD Amendment Page 21 of 21 Thursday, April 14, 2022 the Hacienda Lakes MPUD’s northern boundary, and if the unit types on either side of the PUD boundary are the same (i.e., both single family detached or both two - family, etc.), as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Attachments: A) Draft Ordinance B) Applicant’s Backup Materials 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: 4-14 map update Hacienda-Lakes-North Area PUDA -Staff-Report- CAO comment (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 of 78 EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE± TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 *: Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30%) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. I GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. II TRACT “R”, RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi-family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi-family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle (RV) units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; 3. Two-family and duplex dwellings; 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 2 of 78 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi-family dwellings; 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); 3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non-commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; 5. Private stables on single-family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 3 of 78 III Tract “RV”: Up to 290 RV units are allowed only if residential units are converted to RV in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used in whole or part, other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Recreational vehicle parks (Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to the criteria contained in Exhibit B, and only in the location depicted on Exhibit C. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. Except as provided herein, the RV District shall comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) including Sections 2.03.03.F and 5.5.10. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; IV III TRACT “R/MU”, RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to I,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi-family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi-family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhi bit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; 3. Two-family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi-family dwellings; 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 4 of 78 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services, (Groups 8011-8049, 8071-8072, 8082, and 8092-8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; 3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. IV TRACT “BP” BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract “BP” is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 5 of 78 A. Principal Uses: 1. Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311-2399); 2. Building construction (groups 1521-1542); 3. Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799); 6. Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833-2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive- thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221-8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511-2599); 14. Government offices/buildings (groups 9111-9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661 ); 15. Health services (groups 8011-8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812-3873); 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 6 of 78 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911-3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812-7819); 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll-up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right-of-way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non-direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed l00 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711-2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043-5049, 5063-5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192-5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: l. Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334-7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371-7384, 7389); 2. Child day care services (group 8351); 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 7 of 78 3. Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6021-6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories/research/rehabilitative groups; 5. Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services (groups 7215-7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311-6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712-6799); attorneys (group 8111 ); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off-street parking shall be as required for a single-family residence. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. VI TRACT “C”, COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical-related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 8 of 78 retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed withi n Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi-family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed-use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising- miscellaneous (group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911-7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611-5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211-5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages-automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 - 7533, 7536 -7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction - General contractors (groups 1521 - 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211-5261); 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 9 of 78 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153-6159); 24. Business services (groups 7311-7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371-7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382-7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive- away automobile, exhibits-building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812-4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction - special trade contractors (groups 1711 - 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011-6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 - 8249); 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 10 of 78 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411-5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331-5399); 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011-8049, 8051-8059, 8071-8072, 8082 and 8092-8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712-5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611-8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 - 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self-storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non-depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111-6163 ); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711- 8713); 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 11 of 78 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221-7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios (7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); 68. Political organizations (group 8651); 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661); 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531-6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731-8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922 - 7929); 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 12 of 78 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (4311 except major distribution center); 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools (groups 8243-8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five-foot, six-inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT “A” ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 13 of 78 A. Principal Uses: 1. "Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; 3. Exhibition hall/community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator-related facilities; 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 14 of 78 6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Fuel storage and related facilities. VIII TRACT “P” PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. VIIIX TRACT “PF” PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 15 of 78 IX TRACT “JD” JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non-motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms/bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). XI TRACT “S” SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 16 of 78 1. Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; 3. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 4. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; 5. Recreational facilities. XII SIGNS: A. Seven on-premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled “Boundary Marker” on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) D. Two entry signs along Collier Boulevard associated with the Hacienda Lakes - North Area shall be permitted to include multiple residential communities on a single sign to accommodate developments which share access to Collier Boulevard as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Signage Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2 (See Exhibit E, Deviations #14, 15, and 16). 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 17 of 78 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi-family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi-family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 18 of 78 C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 2.73 Recreational Vehicle units/spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi-family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single-family units, and 1,056 multi-family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The l, 760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi-family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single-family dwelling unit equates to 1 single-family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 19 of 78 residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: a. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; b. There shall be on-site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on-site, or catered; c. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; d. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; e. An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. f. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; g. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. h. Lands described as Hacienda Lakes Tracts G and I and designated as R/MU on the Master Plan are subject to the following: One Hundred Percent (100%) of the units will be restricted to households with 80% Annual Median Income (AMI) or less. This restriction shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30) years from the date issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In combinat ion with the commitment to affordability, the following operational characteristics apply to this project: a. The facility shall be for residents 62 years of age or older; b. There shall be an onsite manger/ activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; c. An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; d. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on-site services to better reflect projected trip generation. [HEX 2021-33] In addition to the above operational characteristics, the following site design characteristics apply to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes project (lands described in PL20200001717): a. All principal structures on Tract I will be set back a minimum of 8 0 feet from the parcel boundary. [HEX2021-33] b. The one (1) dumpster external to the building on Tract I will be located on the east side of the principal structure and a minimum of 350 feet from the southern property line. The dumpster will be concrete block enclosure with gates and used for disposal of bulk household items only, such as furniture. Household refuse, such as food products, will be housed in trash compactors internal to the principal structure. [HEX2021-33] c. An enhanced 10-foot Type “A” buffer will be provided on Tract I along the portion of the southern property line adjacent to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes meeting the following minimum specifications: 1. Total of 44 trees comprised of 11 canopy trees and 33 sabal palms. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 20 of 78 2. Canopy trees shall be a minimum of 10 feet tall at the time of planting. 3. Sabal palm trees shall be a minimum of 15’-30’ staggered height at time of planting grouped in clusters with a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, 10 feet on center. [HEX2021-33] d. Temporary construction fencing with a minimum height of five (5) feet shall be installed along the southern and eastern property lines throughout the duration of construction activities and shall include screen mesh fabric. [HEX2021-33] e. A 6-foot-tall earthtone (brown or beige) PVC fence shall be installed along the southern portion of the eastern property line as shown on Exhibit C-1. [HEX2021-33] f. All light fixtures/poles will be limited to a maximum height of 25 feet and will be “Dark Skies” compliant. Exterior wall lighting, on the buildings shall not be located above the second story. [HEX2021-33] g. On-site security measures shall include a recorded license plate reader at the entrance to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes. All recorded data is private and confidential and will be provided to law enforcement upon their request. [HEX2021-33] h. The developer/operator agrees to provide a Resident Assurance Check-In Program materially consistent Florida Housing Finance Corporation requirements as referenced below: The developer will provide and use an established system of checking in with each resident on a pre-determined basis not less than once per day, at no cost to the resident. Residents may opt out of this program with a written certificate that they choose not t o participate. [HEX2021-33] Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria • Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. • This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a combination of both. • The RV Park shall be limited to Class A motorcoaches only. • In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. • The density of the RV Park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the d evelopment parcel [not less than 20 acres]. • The Lord’s way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard (CR-951). • A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially zoned or developed parcel. Sign Development Standards • Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 21 of 78 • Any signage proposed for identifying the on-site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. • Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development, or Plat Approval • At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 22 of 78 TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ZERO LOT LINE TWO FAMILY/ DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS CLUB HOUSE/ REC- REATION BLDGS RECREAT- IONAL VEHICLE PARKS Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per lot 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 10,000 SF 800 SF per space/unit Minimum Lot Width 40’ 35’ 35’ per lot 18’ per lot or unit 150’ N/A 35’ Minimum Distance From MPUD Boundary ** 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ Front Yard Setback 20’, or 15’ with side load garages 20’, or 15’ with side load garages 20’, or 15’ with side load garages 20’ 20’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. N/A 10’ Side Yard 6’ 5’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 6’ 0’ or 6’ ½ BH N/A 5’ Rear Yard 15’ 15’ 15’ 15’ 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater N/A 8’ From Preserve 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ Maximum Zoned Height 35’ 35’ 35’ 45’ 75’ 40’ 30’ Maximum Actual Height 42’ 42’ 42’ 50’ 85’ 50’ 35’ Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures 12’ 10’ 12’ 12’ ½ SBH 15’ or ½ SBH, whichever is greater 10’ Accessory Structures Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ 10’ SPS From Preserve 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ Minimum Distance Between Accessory Structures on same lot 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 10’ Minimum Distance Between Accessory and Principle Principal Structures on same lot 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35’ SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35’ SPS SPS Minimum Distance From MPUD Boundary ** 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N/A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights **Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 23 of 78 General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. iii. For corner lots, only one (1) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10’ setback. This setback applies only to single family detached, zero lot line, and two family/duplex dwelling types with a maximum zoned building height of 35’ within the Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes property, as depicted on Exhibit B-1, and the Azure at Hacienda Lakes property, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. At the time of platting, intersections subject to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05. [HEX 2015-06 & HEX 2016-20] Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi-family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. 6) Minimum distance between principal structures for multi -family dwellings shall be 20 feet for multi-family buildings where both buildings have a zoned height less than 35 feet, or ½ SBH for multi-family buildings exceeding 35 feet in zoned height, only for multi -family buildings within Azure at Hacienda Lakes, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] 7) In the event the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD in the area west of the FPL easement, a zero-foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required (See deviation #18). 8) Where the property owner in the San Marino PUD agrees to the elimination of a buffer east of the FPL Easement, a ten-foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required (See deviation #18). 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 24 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 25 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 26 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 27 of 78 TABLE II COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR ½ THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER*** 10 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES **** 25 FEET 10 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR½ THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET***** 25 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET***** 30 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA – COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - SENIOR HOUSING MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET** 80 SQUARE FEET** * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to kiosks *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. **** Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. ***** except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single-family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single-family land uses set forth in Table I. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 28 of 78 TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY)- BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY)-SCHOOL 50 FEET*** 50 FEET*** 10 FEET 25 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES N/A N/A PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES- BUSINESS PARK MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES-SCHOOL 15 FT. OR½ THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS * OR 18 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL 35 FEET 50 FEET 35 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT- BUSINESS PARK MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 50 FEET 60 FEET 35 FEET 60 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA- BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - SCHOOL 1000 SQUARE FEET OR 350 SQUARE FEET N/A 35 SQUARE FEET MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK SCHOOL 500 SQUARE FEET N/A 80 SQUARE FEET N/A * Whichever is greater *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B-4, a Commercial/Industrial typical roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix 8-3, a Local Street typical roadway section. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 29 of 78 TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR½ THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET** N/A * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 2015-06 s-1 NORTI◄ m_ 11 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROJECT SITE 7 tll 11 Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 II ORI BOUNDARY 20 21 0 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1" Page 3 of 7 NORTH m EXHIBIT 8-2 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP ,�t�t'{ :�;ti/:'. �\-- :ff� ;;if!_ PROJECT LOCATION !'((:��{�- ;.:. ;,·.:" ORI BOUNDARY ..... _ +-.�-.;.....---.--- ' " (s�,��:-:;''{�•{J�i:�:��r -' - ']J;;. :f :, >: /' ;)t, ·,,:t•.'---<){ : 'i �-.��;/:';�{�}" ':" ' :' \ .___, __ :;--, ------11 .. ··.i��/:l�!,:·:f��)�.::i!�1is�·: '';,· . 1-,.., __ ....., __ __,,....., -----,,. ,.;J;:�,\tttr:t;�\:1��\.:,i,�).:.:-, ·: '\�:: ii��7. :jj,., ,.:•A;:l, '74it:: �,f :f :,��f-' ,·.-�;-; . � .. ,.t,X: .· 1�\ ,·/" . ;, 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) � -0 0 0 ll'l w 0 0 � co N � ui C .,a: c �::, �., ::E C 0 § ....J ll'l w 0 0 i N � 'ii :c � chen C -�2 e?.,C ., (!) € 0 z ., -0 C ., PROJECT SITE EXHIBIT B-3 HACIENDA LAKES NORTH PROJECT LOCATION MAP 11 DRI/PUD BOUNDARY 7 13 18 _J 36 31 NORTH m 2 32 ·13 {r;P;;;RE::;PARE:-;;;:;:D�F;;;O:;;R;-:-:----------------,:F;L:::o:ru;::D:-:A-;C:E:R:T::IF::,c::-A::TE;::-:o:F:-A;-:u:THR;:::-;:o:::rz�A::n::o;:N::::#8:6:36���r.iilri\i'1i!;.,;;.l;;;l;;;.].;iii{�l"'];;;:.J;.1 i cr-oJJ Br other s SECTION:14 TOWNSHIP:50 RANGE:26 ENGINEERING � AME RICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1j 24201 WALDEN CENTER DRIVE, SIBTE 204 a5 FILE NAME: 1284100E15·e BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34134 28100 BONITA 6R4NDE ORM· SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405•7899 EMAIL! lnfe@waldropenglneerlng.com g,PHONE: (239) 596-6600 SHEET:J OF Jiii _____________________ ___. _____________________________ _. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) rd r . ii � � ,S • i i � i 6 xhibit C =��===,=�=-=---·-·· --------=: �:�======-- _--�=-----===ti : • ' :: -11. ::i :: !I , ,. :: �---"-,-""-______ lli ___ 1,1 _ __ 9'!!1!!1_2'°;..'�lM#'!l-..p.---1 -!�r-���-,. .. • -- � I! :i ::1" " 11 ii I :: pm:;�!!'!i�m!lp�..!!il�=.i.:f--t-��cl � .'i.t l•f' HL.L. LULAT f!l!f.f.'..Q'lii :?IL2T[' Ii Ii ,, Ii Ii 1i :Yi /'• ilH(t HAC/£1VDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. HAUJr•J"((I /Jfl ... -.'W: Ii Ii i �,. HACIEND A LAKES U1llA INC�!;· .• IJJi/.'flJZ'f!f'Q2 .\IS.J. OVERALL MPUDIDRI MPUDIDRI .&. � f f ..f. A 911rw,yqa Mw11W IHHkfV DH/¥ MASTER PLAN .,o..,.,._,,o,,,,...,..tDD_....,�,.,• !MIC-....... �JJ9Q1 :1111111 .. ,., ..... Q:Noll,11 .. 11 itlflVMOtfU ll'Mll 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RRA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDWILLOW RUN RPUD RURAL FRINGEURBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE (URF)P,PRESERVETRACTA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDR/MURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLCOLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)GOOD TURNCENTER MPUDMcMULLEN MPUDUNDEVELOPEDHAMMOCK PARKCOMMERCECENTER CPUDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK EXT.FIRST ASSEMBLYMINISTRIES PUDHACIENDA LAKES PKWYEXISTING SWAMPBUGGY BUILDINGEXISTINGSWAMPBUGGYTRACKMIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)BP35.38 AC.ROW120'RESERVATIONROW60' HACIENDALAKES PKWYEXTENSIONRESERVATIONPFCAP,PRESERVETRACTSCJDP,PRESERVETRACTLLLLPRESERVETRACTEXISTING 170'FPL EASEMENTHENDERSONCREEK CANALLP,PRESERVETRACT*SEE NOTE #4WILLOW RUN RPUDMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 2*COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT"C" * COMMERCIALLAND USE ACREAGE**2.51± ACRES34.16± ACRESDESIGNATORATTRACTION47.27± ACRES"A"RESIDENTIAL447.86± ACRES"R"BUSINESS PARK35.38± ACRES"BP"PRESERVE1546.11± ACRES"P"PUBLIC FACILITY 1.33± ACRES"PF"JUNIOR DEPUTY21.62± ACRES"JD"SCHOOL19.55± ACRES"S"RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 38.82± ACRES"R/MU"PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS 70.04± ACRES"ROW"2262.14± ACRESTOTAL* THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTERACREAGE OF 36.67** EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE"ROW" TRACTABPCPPFJDSRR/MUROW- ATTRACTION TRACT- BUSINESS PARK- COMMERCIAL- PRESERVE TRACT- PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS)- JUNIOR DEPUTY- SCHOOLS- RESIDENTIAL TRACT- RESIDENTIAL / MEDICAL USE- PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTSPROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATIONRELOCATED OR EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATIONLEGENDLAND USE SUMMARY0SCALE IN FEET300 600 1200WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E0328100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com1B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/23/2022 11:58:42 AMHACIENDA LAKESMPUD/DRIMASTER PLANFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONS9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 297Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North *COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT"C" * COMMERCIALLAND USE ACREAGE**2.51± ACRES34.16± ACRESDESIGNATORATTRACTION47.27± ACRES"A"RESIDENTIAL447.86± ACRES"R"BUSINESS PARK35.38± ACRES"BP"PRESERVE1546.11± ACRES"P"PUBLIC FACILITY 1.33± ACRES"PF"JUNIOR DEPUTY21.62± ACRES"JD"SCHOOL19.55± ACRES"S"RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 38.82± ACRES"R/MU"PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS 70.04± ACRES"ROW"2262.14± ACRESTOTAL* THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTERACREAGE OF 36.67** EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE"ROW" TRACTABPCPPFJDSRR/MUROW- ATTRACTION TRACT- BUSINESS PARK- COMMERCIAL- PRESERVE TRACT- PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS)- JUNIOR DEPUTY- SCHOOLS- RESIDENTIAL TRACT- RESIDENTIAL / MEDICAL USE- PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTSPROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATIONRELOCATED OR EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATIONLEGENDLAND USE SUMMARYP,PRESERVETRACTP,PRESERVETRACTCOLLIER REGIONALMEDICAL CENTER PUDRA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDSABAL PALM ROADP,PRESERVETRACTP,PRESERVETRACTA, AGRICULTURESINGLE-FAMILYHOMES AND PRIVATENURSERY USESA, AGRICULTURESINGLE-FAMILYHOMES AND PRIVATENURSERY USESR/MURRRRRRLLLLLLLLLLLNOT PART OF THISPROJECT (LESS &EXCEPT PARCEL B)NOT A PART OF THISPARCEL (LESS &EXCEPT PARCEL A)A, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDRPUD ROCKEDGEWINDINGCYPRESS (DRI)RURAL FRINGEFRINGE (URF)MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)URBAN RESIDENTIALCOLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)ROW120'RESERVATIONROW60'RESERVATIONMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 10SCALE IN FEET300 600 1200WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E0328100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com2B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/23/2022 11:58:43 AMHACIENDA LAKESMPUD/DRIMASTER PLANFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONS9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 298Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North MPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES:1. WITHIN THE MPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE A MINMUM OF 60% USEABLEOPEN SPACE.2. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALLBE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE.3. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS,LAKES, AND/OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP ORCONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL.4. IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PL20210002687 ARE VACATED BY THEBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS AREALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION IS NOT APPROVED, THEN THESEACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED.5. SEE EXHIBIT C-2 FOR NORTH AREA DEVIATION LOCATIONS.HACIENDA LAKES NATIVE PRESERVE SUMMARYPROJECT AREA2262.14TOTALRURAL (AC)1637.07DESCRIPTION1721.971426.59ON-SITE NATIVE VEGETATION2.020.00LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK EXT.0.420.00LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN THE LORDS WAY EXT.11.005.93LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN THE BENFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR6.075.02LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVES1702.461415.64NATIVE VEGETATION FOR REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS-*PERCENTAGE FOR REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE<921.09<849.38REQUIRED NATIVE VEGETATION1546.1161.80COMPENSATING NATIVE PRESERVE (2x URF DEFICIT)**1493.051395.351354.54PRESERVED NATIVE VEGETATION**625.07TOTAL PRESERVE AREAURBAN (AC)2.02295.385.010.42286.871.0625%53.0671.7140.81* NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIREMENT (LDC SUBSECTION 2.05.02 B.2.G.II.) OF 90% WITHINTHE RFMUD SENDING LANDS EXCEEDS 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUDSENDING LANDS. THEREFORE, OVER 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD SENDINGLANDS SHALL BE THE REQUIRED RURAL NATIVE VEGETATION AREA.**COMPLIANCE WITH LDC SUBSECTION 3.05.07 H.1.A., REQUIRES NATIVE VEGETATIONPLANTING ENHANCEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 12.24 ACRES OF THE PROJECT'S URFSUBDISTRICT PRESERVE TRACT. COMPLIANCE WITH 100% OF THE NATIVEVEGETATION PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT SHALL BE ACHIEVED THROUGHPRESERVING RFMUD PROJECT NATIVE VEGETATION IN AN AMOUNT TWO TIMES THEDEFICIENT NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE ACREAGE IN THE URF SUBDISTRICTPROJECT LANDS AS IS PROVIDED FOR THROUGH THE ADOPTED GMP AMENDMENT.MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITYRESIDENTIAL DENSITY: THIS MPUD SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGUNITS (DU) THAT EQUATES TO A DENSITY OF 0.78 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE. THE1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE EITHER SINGLE OR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AS DEFINED IN THELDC. NO MORE THAN 1,232 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTIRE PUD.CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE 1,760 UNIT ALLOCATION. AMINIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE R/MU TRACT, AND AMINIMUM OF 17 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN TRACT C. THE BALANCE OFTHE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS GENERATED FROM TRACT C (13 UNITS) MUST BECONSTRUCTED IN EITHER THE R/MU TRACT, OR ON A PORTION OF TRACT R, WITHINONE-THIRD OF ONE MILE OF THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT CLAND USE CONVERSION FACTORSRESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 1.0 RESIDENTIAL UNIT EQUATES TO 4 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS (NOTTO EXCEED 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN THE ENTIRE PUD). UP TO 1,232 OF THE TOTAL1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY AS DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENTCODE.COMMERCIAL INTENSITY: HACIENDA LAKES IS INTENDED TO BE DEVELOPED WITH AMIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT INCLUDE 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSSFLOOR AREA OF RETAIL USES, 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICALOFFICE USES, 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF GENERAL OFFICE USES,140,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES, AND 135HOTEL ROOMS.IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS. SUCH MAXIMUMTRIP GENERATION CAP WAS DEVELOPED BASED ON 327,500 GROSS SQUARE FEET OFRETAIL LAND USES, 50,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE LAND USES, 20,000GROSS SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL OFFICE LAND USES, 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OFBUSINESS PARK LAND USES, A PRIMARY SCHOOL WITH A CONTEMPLATED ENROLLMENT OF919 STUDENTS, 135 HOTEL ROOMS, NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET, 704SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, AND 1,056 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS. HOWEVER, THE HOTEL SHALL NOTCOUNT AGAINST THE 140,000 SQUARE FOOT CAP ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS PARK.SHOULD THE BP TRACT NOT BE DEVELOPED AS A BUSINESS PARK BUT BE DEVELOPED AS ASCHOOL (EXCLUDING COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS), SUCHFACILITY SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET ALLOWED INTHAT TRACT.THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO CONVERT RETAIL LAND USES TO OFFICE LANDUSES AT A ONE TO ONE (1:1) RATIO, NOT TO EXCEED 25% OF THE RETAIL LAND USEALLOCATION PROVIDED ONLY IF THE CONVERTED USE IS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE TRACT.THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO WHOLLY CONVERT THE HOTEL DEVELOPMENTOPPORTUNITY OF 135 ROOMS NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 SQUARE FEET TO 60,000 SQUAREFEET OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES.ALL EXISTING LAND USES AND FACILITIES IN THE ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY TRACTSSHALL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE OVERALL TRIP AND LAND USE CAP.SENIOR HOUSING INTENSITY: THE INTENSITY OF ANY SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT SHALLHAVE A MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) OF 0.60. THE DWELLING UNIT CAP IS ONLYINTENDED TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITSAS THOSE UNITS ARE DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE DEVELOPMENT MAYINCLUDE IN EXCESS OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IF SOME ARE DEVELOPED AS SENIORHOUSING UNITS. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE CCOMMERCIAL TRACT, SENIOR HOUSING UNITS SHALL BE DEVELOPED THROUGH THECONVERSION OF RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE ALLOWED FORCONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING UNITS BASED ON THE LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORSABOVE. HOWEVER, 1 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT EQUATES TO 1 SINGLE-FAMILY STYLEINDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS. IN NO INSTANCE SHALL GREATER THAN 450 SENIOR HOUSINGUNITS BE DEVELOPED IN THE MPUD.TOTAL PROJECT INTENSITY: IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAKHOUR TRIPS.0SCALE IN FEET300 600 1200WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E0328100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com3B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/23/2022 11:58:44 AMHACIENDA LAKESMPUD/DRIMASTER PLANFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONS9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 299Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North LEGEND+-+ INGRESS/EGRESS � LAKE � PROJECT AREA= 6.71± ACRES TRACT "C" = COMMERCIAL TRACT "R/MU" = RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE TRACT "R" = RESIDENTIAL Approved by HEX Decision 2021-33 NORTH m NOTTO SCALE RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD TRACT "C" COLLIER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PREPARED FOR: HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912 TRACT TRACT "R" fvv .Vvv lvVv \A/v r Vv /� Vvv � /VVV'vi �/ 1/'vv"v/ /VV'/ \A/VI VY PALACIO ERRACE WESTI PALACIO TERRACE NORTH I EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO ••• ,,, T/4, I I] i{I] :.I RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD ,� ENGINEERINGSECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: COLLIER COUNTY CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 23 50 26 FLORIDA REVISION DATE: SHEET: 11/11/2020 I OF I 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE· SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waJdropengineering.com 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) required 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer enhanced 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer existing 6' wall existing 15' wide type 'B' landscape buffer existing 15' wide type 'B' landscape buffer ex. 6' wall Esplanade al Hacienda lakes ··�•"·1 SECTION SITE PLAN enhanced sabal palm buffer 115'-30' staggered ht.) code required canopy tree 110' ht.) Allegro at Hacienda lakes ex. 15' wide type 'B' landscape buffer required 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer existing 6' wall 11, )> "O "O 0 < CD a. O" '< I m >< 0 CD C') cii" 0 ::::J I\) 0 I\) ..J. I w w M����L 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 301Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDWILLOW RUN RPUD RURAL FRINGEURBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE (URF)A, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDRRRRRRRLLLLLLLCOLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)FIRST ASSEMBLYMINISTRIES PUDHACIENDA LAKES PKWYEXISTING SWAMPBUGGY BUILDINGEXISTINGSWAMPBUGGYTRACKMIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)BP35.38 AC.ROW120'RESERVATIONROW60' HACIENDALAKES PKWYEXTENSIONRESERVATIONPFAP,PRESERVETRACTLLEXISTING 170'FPL EASEMENTHENDERSONCREEK CANALLP,PRESERVETRACT1614151617*18181818WILLOW RUN RPUD190SCALE IN FEET150 300 600WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E034B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/28/2022 10:19:51 AMENLARGEMENT OFHACIENDA LAKESNORTH AREA C-2FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSABPPPFR- ATTRACTION TRACT- BUSINESS PARK- PRESERVE TRACT- PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS)- RESIDENTIAL TRACTLEGEND* IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PL20210002687 ARE VACATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTYCOMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE ALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATIONIS NOT APPROVED, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED.- PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS- DEVIATION LOCATIONPROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATIONRELOCATED OR EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATIONROW#9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 302Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North EXHIBITD LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89°10'42"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°1 l'l4"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89°09'39"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°1 l'0l"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00°13'35"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00°14'15"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87°07'13"E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01°08'02"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°12'28"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01°04'1 l"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°28'21"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 °01 '58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01°18'52"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89°22'00"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01°14'38"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.0l 001'15"E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58"W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01°01'15"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00°51'54"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'3l"E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01°01'15"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'3 I "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 °48'00"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°3 l '38"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°48'1 l"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'42"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00°48'45"E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 40 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °27'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00°49'30"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION II ; THENCE N.00°50'27"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87°28'56"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °49'13"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °47'37"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °27'14"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°47'14"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'42"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87 °30'06"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°38'50"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00°41'44"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°40'34"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°36'23"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87°26'1 l"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°30'06"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°38'50"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °32'03"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°33'59"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°38'5l"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °37'27"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°42'40"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°40'54"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°56'29"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°34'58"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAlD FRACTION; THENCE N.00°4I'32"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°41'38"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °26'32"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 41 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°33'18"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°34'02"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88°12'42"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03°39'20"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88°56'10"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'20"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'13"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03°18'3l"E. FOR 14 51.00 FEET; THENCE N.88°56'54"E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00°31'35"E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89°15'59"E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89°57'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°37'14"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°34'43"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00°41'48"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°23'00"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35"E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00°52'45"E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89°46'12"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°49'34"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 °12'08"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. l O 1,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00°59'10"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89°22'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°55'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89°46'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES+/­ PARCEL "B" BEGINNfNG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °40'10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°17'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°56'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-l0146 BCC Approved I 0/25/1 I Page 42 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °23'02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 °00'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNEROF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES+/-Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page43 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2435 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT A EmibH"A" A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITIJATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 soum. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE 4 INCH SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENT REFERENCED IN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD NUMBER 84343 MARKING THE EAST ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTII, RANGE 26 EAST; TIIENCE ALONG THE EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS Q -��!'-"'P 'l'+\."� .. �S DESCRIPTION, s.89 °0t '5B"W., FOR 30.03 FEET ����ffi���,.,n., ... WES 1 TERL v RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD RO,"11.,..,. _"'-� __ _ ......... ,� .. ,ING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING SECTION LINE, S.89 °01 '58"W., FOR 1,298.4 mtt'1�i;ilB�::rnl� CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHEA NE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTE,n....,,...·= ALONG THE EAST, sourn AND WEST LINES O TER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER o .. �-uq,�_...,.�� ,-,vr.&J QUARTER THE FOLLOWING TIIREE (3) COURSES: 1.TIIENCE S.01 °18'52"W., FOR 679.65 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD wrra CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTiiWEST ONE QUARTER; 2.THENCE S.89°22'00"W., FOR 663.28 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD Wl1li CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOtrrnWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 3. THENCE N.01 °14'38"E., FOR 675.75 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD Wl11l CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER AND A POINT ON SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE; TIIENCE ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 664.25 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89 °01 '58"W., FOR 627. I 6 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD MARKING TIIE SOUTiiWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF TIIE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF N.01 °01 '15"E., FOR 1,699.99 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE S.88 °58'45"E., FOR 44S.48 FEET; Page 44 of 78 Exhibit D-1 Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Legal Description Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2436 • TIIENCE N.01 °01'15"E., FOR 400.00 FEET; TIIENCE S.88°58'45"E., FOR 151.77 FEET; • TIIENCE N.01 °01'15"E., FOR 457.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXTENSION AND A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1.TIIENCE EASTERLY 268.S8 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE TO TIIE LEFT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 949.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'55" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.82°44'27"E. FOR 267.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2.TIIENCE EASTERLY 297.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 °22'07" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.88°49'03"E. FOR 294.05 FEET TO A POINT OF COMP 3.TIIENCE EASTERLY 211.21 �illb\���-r,�Gn �s!\�T A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA VINO A RADi&...IU-.U'I' A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11 °38'09" AND BEING S 210.84 FEET TO A PO 4.THENCE EASTERL THE LEFT HA VINO A�•� 27 °00'44" AND BEING 541.84 FEET; 5. THENCE N.87°37'31 "E., 6. TIIENCE SOUTIIEASTE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA S.71°10'49"E. FOR CURVE TO ANGLE OF S.78°52'07"E. FOR ._. Y:L"-IA .�..,n.VATIJRE; ,.,.,. ......... 1,-tJ.J""'u;;.,..."A.�·c OF A TANGENTIAL FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 °57'22" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.46°53'48"E. FOR 71.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD ROAD AND A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; TIIENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1.TIIENCE SOUTIIEASTERL Y 955.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 1,160.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°11 '39" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD Wl-DCH BEARS S.25°00'56"E. FOR 928. 70 FEET; 2.THENCE S.48 °36'46"E., FOR 641.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 3.THENCE SOUTIIEASTERLY 909.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°04'53" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.23°34'19"E. FOR 880.38 FEET; 4.TIIENCE S.01 °28'07"W., FOR 239.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. Page45 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 46 of 78 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights‐of‐way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights‐of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow “boundary marker” signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for “boundary markers” to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6’) feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8’) feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord’s Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off‐site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E‐2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. [HEX 2014-18] Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 47 of 78 Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one (1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead‐end streets, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off‐street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single‐family and two‐family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off‐street parking for multi‐family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit B‐2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at Hacienda Lakes – North Area as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs with a combined sign area of 128 square feet which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead‐end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes – North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture-zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes - North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NORTI-1 m Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 11 PROJECT s,rE Exhibit B Page 3 of 4 7 18 ORI BOUNDARY e 20 211 D 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-2 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA !AKES ENTRY SIGN LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 1, �--· ----�...--_,....-��---�---�� ---��=.:;::::::___ c�===5:;.=���..=;=-��)C3 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD_....;, ;("'•--..-.;;;.:;,,, -- I )> ., r I I' ,, ,1 Li ;1 i, 1! '�-������,., ..... , • *a■�•�."'� RM .. 1 ••••• -..... Exhibit 8 Paae __ 4 of 4 ENTRY SIGN 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North J:161� (Hacienda Lakes-Toll Bros) General\Orawlngs-Exhlblts\51S-OO-E01 Entry Sign Devtalton Exhlbll\Current Plans\5180103-LSBese-Slgn.dwg �63 I w Cl) ; - 0 'Tj (.;J !" ,.� Ill J:-, "al�� � 8� II z I>! !ii. z � m Q a � &l !; g 8 i � 0 z .. (/) '"I:) �� ::.: :,ti �-< �� � tlJ .... � '"I:) � Pl> trl r � � � I ) (,.) 01 ·· ,-r I -< REVOO <<SUBMITTED» 12/11/15 2/11/18 I REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUN1Y COMMENTS 3/23118 I REVISED PER CLIENT ANO COUN1Y COMMENTS r� �h '1!-.i;i Jz ?i �1� :□ I� � (b ! �I I � =::c::I � p., I � I iO �1111 rn 1111 � . � ("D "'i j :::, I I� I I :□ � ., 11 1 O' i 1 12' � AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES-EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 1 OF 3-PRIMARYENTRYSIGNPLAN&ELEVATION Mlil\'Al 11] i{I] Q PREPARED FOR: ,waoo.cean,1CJ1n<1>•,u;nu><,zm,-..,,....., .,�ENGINEER ING TOLL BROTHERS LJO g 80Bd .. � .. l!q14x3 fill! IUIIIIID3.{.Sllas.,.Slgn.d"11 SHEET:! Of◄ I I D1IO mml'l GRWJ(DIIM •111111:808 ICNTAINIMll.f\.M11S Ptl39-C06-7777 ,,..,....1181 OWLJ.bda■wldso • I&.,... Oc-9 �OG uo,spaa X3H Aq paAOJddv 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 313Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 201 6-20 NORTH � ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES Exhibit "1" Pa e 6 of 7 PROJECT LOCATION D. m ] j .·;,:-. ORI BOUNDARY � EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 2 OF 3 .!r-------------------------7iii�iiiiiii;;;:::;;:.;;;�;;;;.1 j AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES EXHIBIT LOCATION MAP Nl\'1!11 ll i{ll ;iif-----------------..----------..--------·8 PREPARED FOR: SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: PLORIDACDTI11CATEOFAVTH00l2Al10IU..,. ENGINEERING f TOLL BROTHERS. 14,23 ,24 sos 26E (;ML....,,....., I """""• I LNOl8CN'EAACH!l"ECT\IIE AMERICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA � FD..ENAME: S1801E0S0l.dwg ------- 11100 80NIT4 8IMNm aw£· IUl'R. 300 --..-.n:u1311 Pl 238,,,485-7777 ti 2Do405,,7898 OMIIJ bd'o81rtdrnpe I J ,_,, ; SHEET: 3 OF 4 .:.;.._ _____________ ..._ _____ ..._ ______ ...... ________ 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) I I I j : I ;! j� ii PRIMARY ENTRY SIGN MONUMENT (80 S.F. -MIN. 25' SETBACK) PROPOSED BENFIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY •.: .. •J..,: . .-/. / Y\Sa\�:-;· ii\�-� □''8' C'.] 11 I I I I 8 8 :\8:. 8 8\\ 8811 -.I• :·.( �\l!!-__ .. . _.:_:_if. ·:-U:.-,- :i-'. _.__1 .:.. ·-""' L -.I. ,. '.-� ' .--,,� -:-•. �-• I ••• -··.W-�-�·· '_: .-.:.-f· .-, .• _ "�-· ... ;-.!..�-'.::--. �-:•--- *.I._ ... ---�.--- .,,· . -•L-;:t .,..!..;..:'.. . .),,,_•': --:"° _1,_ -:.:1 .• ,. -'-_'../-: _,.;_ :•.;..:,.._i-�---£.� .-'.'.-': <-_II _1,;__ __ ,-;_ ::·-.. .;�-�-� --'� -� �l_ PROPOSED DEAO:END - - I; L '.lo_ __ ,}!_ ,, .. .., -�:W{-:-_;J; � N l�IWM•ntrnQ ENGINEERING --·--------·-------._ ___ ,._ ____ AZUll.EAT HACIENDA LAXES SJG)ILQCATlOMMAP l!Xlllffl .. "C "C CD a. I 0 CD Q. en 6 :::J I\) 0 ....I. 0) I I\) 0 . --.i'E .... ;;:;f m X Ii I EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 3 OF 3 I :=:= �I :r-·O" � 0 : ...., � ....., ..9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 315Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) --d � � �r' [ I� -:2 : ,,tP ___ �----�:7lil1f: BOUNDARY 111 \ MARKER ::: : (32SF) ::: I I I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT � I . :1 ,ENTRY en � �"'a:: w 0 (.) PROPERTY BOUNDARY, TYPICAL I !�\': 1r 1 !LA�i\ I . ,,1-' ---+,r---'4 \\�/ I ' / 'j FUTURE ROAD CONECTION � N I PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT I CMl-mll�•� -�LJ­ D109UM111----­NMU.-ILUUS r:.-nnfl ....... nff ��- HACIENDA LAKES NORTH AREA PREPARED FOR: EXHIBIT E-4, HACIENDA LAKES -NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT, SHEET I OF 2---,,M-,,.-,mw-,.,,.-i-2022/01/14 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North ACCENT WALL OR PLANTER 10' '\. .. " . 22' ACCENT WALL OR PLANTER .. •' " 38' ·. .. ,,' 15' . . 20' .:., _________ I ___ -iL' :HACIENDA: I NORTH L _____________ _J I SECONDARY NAME L_ isECONDARY NAME - - - - - - - -1 L _____________ _J 12' ----ACCENT WALL (STAND -ALONE) h TOTAL SIGN AREA 64 SF (PRIMARY NAME - 40 SF) ((2) SECONDARY NAME -12 SF) 12' SIGN ACCENT WALL r-----------,HACIENDA 1- : NORTH � L ___________ J- 12' SIGN AREA32 SF I - i -,l -!! EXHIBIT E-4. HACIENDA LAKES -NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT. SHEET 2 OF 2 l�I aft.-llllNlllUMI -..-oor:a111sa.u-"' .. ___ H._•..,""­-•--R.SOllll ,., ......... nu f,P_,TH9 ---HACTENDA LAKES NORTH AREA PREPARED FOR: 7oll Brothers FILE NAME: 1284101 ENTRYSIGN -2022/01/14 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North EXHIBITF LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. I LEGAL A.Access to Parcel "A", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north-south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90-days of approval of this PUD. B.Access to Parcel "B", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress/egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C.No existing public access/roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off-site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A.Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description Project Area On-Site Native Veaetation Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext. Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor Less the Native Vea Within Archaeological Preserves Native Vegetation For Reauirement Calculations Percentage for required Native Preserve Required Native Vegetation* Preserved Native Vegetation ** Compensatina Native Preserve (2x URF Oeftcit)** Total Preserve Area Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-IO 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Total 2262.14 1721.97 2.02 0.42 12.91 6.07 1700.54 <921.09 1395.35 1544.14 Urban (ac) Rural (ac) 625.07 1637.07 295.38 1426.59 2.02 0.00 0.42 0.00 5.01 7.90 1.06 5.02 286.87 1413.67 25% 71.71 <849.38 40.81 1352.57 61.80 53.06 1491.08 Page 55 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) * Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. ** Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. 8.A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, forCounty review.C.The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Planaccepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement.D.An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior tothe next development order approval.E.Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior tothe first preliminary acceptance.III ENGINEERING A.A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951over the Henderson Creek Canal.IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A.The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP,Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remainundeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs andfurther study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites mayonly occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, andany disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist.8.Historical/archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if anarchaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed.V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A.In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services(EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facilitysite is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit C). The dedication of the oneacre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical ServicesImpact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation ofthe one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes ofthe Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no laterthan at the time the 500th residential unit is included in a development order request (sitedevelopment plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. IfOwner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in thisparagraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of theHacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/2S/l l Page 56 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA I.The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance"), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure I, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request.") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure I, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved I 0125111 Page 57 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) R1ure 1-Hacienda Lakes ORI - Commitment I l.m!li I.Existing lanes/Turn lanes \. Lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed • snalre {·iiijlliii-iiiii--.. ---=---:--:-:- ' ' \ Florida Power Line Easement ' , , / I -,�·'-:::,. -( PodA \ \!'..·. • ... \ �f ./A II.The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-IO 146 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/1 I Page 58 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Flsure 2 -Hadencla Lakes ORI • Commitment 11 II.Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes \, Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed �ay Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Prl!'liously Developed Area to be Developed Florida Power Line Easement III.The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page 59 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site-related improvement. Flpre 3 -Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment Ill J 8 NORTH AREA Liam Ill. Exlstin1 lanes/Tum lanes I.Lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed [J Area Previously Developed Florida Power line Easement IV.With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.95 I at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951 ). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-IO 146 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page60 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) fllure 4- Hacienda Lakes DRI • Commitment IV Yllml 111. EJdstinc lanes/Tum Lanes \. Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed -Roadway Segment to be Constructed LJ Area Previously Developed □Area to be Developed ■ V.The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete thereconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement andconstruct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the westentrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when theCollier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, thecost of the signaliz.ation of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Ownerand other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost toCollier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site-relatedimprovements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed todevelop the foJlowing additional land uses:Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 Page 61 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. F ure S -Hacienda Lakes DRI -Commitment V a.,...---�i� Florida Power Line Easement . I ,.,,....,_.'\ l Residential PodC Rattlesnake YUml I.Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes \. Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Sqment Previously Constructed Roadway Secment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed D Area to be Developed ■ I When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the ORI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to I 00 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 62 of 78Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI.The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for I 00% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards ( arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site-related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 I Page 63 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) F.e 6 - Hadenda ulles Dltl · Commitment VI lam .. E,asMg l.anes/Tum UM5 � ,� "'" L.tn.-i. to be CDMtructt!d/ll«onsuucted R�J'J �-nt i>rf'VIOUsly u,nstruct.c:l -!loadwa� �t to be Con<tructHI At•� PrfMouf,ly � C "'•� ,a � o.wlop..:I I VII.Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod Econnection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by roadeasement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, freeand clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County willprovide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement.The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to beconveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below.Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 Page 64 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 7 -Hacienda ulles DRI · Commitment VI TMlord'sWa YaM .. Ellllinll i..an.,,/Tum l.-- .. L-,/Tum LM>H to be Constrvc:ted/R.comtruct� RONW,I\J 5elMMt Pl'� CclMtru<tea - R.,.t ol Way 10 be "'-'wd Alea Pt� Oewlop!d □ArH to be o.wlapld VIII.Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site-related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10l46 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 Page 65 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Flpn I-Hacienda Lalcn DRI - Commitment VIII Florida Power Line / Easement �2 11111111 Risht of Way to be Dedicated IX.As a part of its State and Federal pennits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the pennitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stonnwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (2)agree to accept stonnwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stonnwater management system. These are site-related contributions. X.At two thresholds during construction of this ORI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the ORI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this ORI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site-related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-I0146 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page 66 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the ORI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. XI.Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a lO'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution. XII.Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a I 0'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution. XIII.ORI traffic studies identified an off-site impact at the interchange of 1-75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left-tum movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound (northbound) 1-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the ORI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build-out of the ORI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FOOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution.Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 I Page 67 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) XIV.If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that areeligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI,Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for thevalue of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for publicfacilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost ofstate and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlifeimpacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federalmitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmentalpermitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlifehabitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corpsof Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project inorder to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not includeCounty required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to theCounty to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmentalmitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-ownedState or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impactfee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV.Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-l0l46 BCC Approved I 0/25/1 I Page 68 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Proposed Access Proposed Access EXISTING CAT ROUTE4A &4B Legend EJ CATSTOP/SHELTER ---Proposed CAT Route 4A & 48 Extension --Existing CAT Route 4A & 4B � Existing CAT Facility 4A ■Existing CAT Facility 4B --E:icisting CAT Route 7 -Proposed Pedestrian Facilities I -.. •H•• Existing Shared Use Path D Project Boundary D Development Boundary � DEVELOPER I PROPOSED CAT I STOP/SHELTER : THE LORD'S WAY I POTENTIAL I CAT STOP/SHELT I I I I PROPOSED 4A&4BCAT ROUTE EXTENSION 500 1,000 Feet Land Use -Attraction Tract -Business Park or School -Commercial -Preserve Tract Public Facilitios Tract (EMS) -Junior Deputy -School Residential Tract -Residenlial J Medical Use Public ROW Reservation Prcparod By: rmJonos Prlnl� Dalo: Qaobo( 6, 2010 Flkl: l:\Protucl:-12005\05_O150.02.Ol_ HIIClendBlnkM;\GUP'!Rev02'1TrtinsllMP,mlld Page 69 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Proposed Access Proposed Access Proposed Access EXISTING CAT ROUTE4A &4B Hacienda Lakes Master Mobility Plan (REVISED (01/20/2022) Legend El CAT STOP/SHELTER ---Proposed CAT Route 4A & 4B Extension --Existing CAT Route 4A & 4B R Existing CAT Facility 4A ■Existing CAT Facility 4B --Existing CAT Route 7 --Proposed Pedestrian Facilities I -•·--Existing Shared Use Palh CJ Project Boundary CJ Development Boundary XISTING CAT ROUTE 7 SLAND) \ DEVELOPER I PROPOSED CAT I STOP/SHELTER I I HACIENDA LAKES PKW'( PROPOSED 4A&4BCAT ROUTE EXTENSION 500 1,000 Feel Land Use -Attraction Tract -Business Park or School -Commercial -Preserve Tract Public Facilitios Tract (EMS) -Junior Deputy -School Resldenlial Tract -Residential I Medical Use Public ROW Reservation Podestrlan Facllltles WIii Bo Extendod Along All Internal Roads Even If Not Shown Propo,cd By: rmtonos Prlnling On10: Oc\obor 6, 2010 FIio; TJProjucls\2005\05_O150.02.O3_ HndcndM..nkes\GMP'!Rc...02\TrnnsltMP.mltd Page 70 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A.Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water-Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water-Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B.The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C.The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D.This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield-SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A.Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TOR Credits and Early Entry TOR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B.A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SOP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SW AMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A.All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 11 :00 p.m. B.The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 sec Approved I 0/25/1 I Page 71 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) C.Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A.Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B.For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A.The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B.Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C.Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets (provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D.Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non-potable uses.X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A.One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and ORI monitoring until close-out of the PUD and ORI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the PUD and ORI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and ORI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the ManagingHacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 72 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP\I0-CPS-01024\119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 73 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT HACIENDA LAKES PUD MASTER USE AND CONVERSION LIST FOR SOP / PLAT/ BUILDING PERMITS APPROVED USES (including square footages) APPROVED RESIDENTIAL USES (SDP & PLAT & BUILDING PERMIT) TOTAL I RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY MANDATED OR DA TE PERMIT# DISTRICT UNITS RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL NON-MANDATED NOTE: IF BUILDING DUPLEX ON ONE LOT, ADD SECOND UNIT AT BUILDING PERMIT DATE PERMIT# APPROVED COMMERCIAL USES IN GROSS FLOOR AREA (SDPs) DISTRICT TOTAL RETAIL TOTAL OFFICE I of 5 TOTAL BP HOTEL G PROJECT TOTAL PROJECT TOTAL Page 58 of 79Page 58 of 79 Page 76 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North DATE PERMIT# APPRO�ED CONYERSJONS (SDPs & PLAT) FROM USE (& QUANTITY) TO USE (& QUANTITY) FROM DISTRICT ATTACHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP /PLAT/ BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP 2 of5 TO DlSTRlCT Page 75 of78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 76 of 78 HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP/PLAT/BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY] MANDATED UNITS BY GMP 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS NON-MANDATED UNITS: 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] REDUCED BY: 1. CARETAKER’S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT = 2.73 RV UNITS 3. 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON-MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI-FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) CONVERSIONS: TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT: __________ [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT ______ [UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL.] TOTAL: 1,760 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 RETAIL IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 OFFICE 140,000 BP 92,000 HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS BP DISTRICT: (A)140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES; AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * OR (B)PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL-RELATED USES [ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] [CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C-CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] [CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C -CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TRACT C: 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; 1.DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2.DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4 of5 Page 77 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 3.UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE[= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES I.DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO ___ OFFICE ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO __ SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [MAY HA VE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * 5 of5 Page 78 of 78 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance - 030822 (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Planned Unit Development Amendment PL20210001791 Application and Support Documents April 21, 2022 – CCPC Hearing PREPARED FOR: Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. SUBMITTED TO: Collier County Zoning Division Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 Contents COVER LETTER AND PROJECT NARRATIVE COMPLETED APPLICATION DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS EVALUATION CRITERIA ORIGINAL PUD DOCUMENT AND SUBSEQUENT HEX DECISIONS PROPOSED PUD DOCUMENT – STRIKETHROUGH/UNDERLINE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SUMMARY PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES TIS WAIVER LETTER ADDRESSING CHECKLIST PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION BOUNDARY SURVEY WARRANTY DEED 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 COVER LETTER AND PROJECT NARRATIVE 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239.405.7777 • www.rviplanning.com September 24, 2021 REVISED JANUARY 2022 Ms. Laura DeJohn, AICP Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 RE: PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI PUD Amendment (PUDA) Dear Ms. DeJohn, Enclosed for your review is an application for a PUD amendment regarding the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, a 2,262.14+/- acre project located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Background and Proposed Development In 2011, the Property was rezoned from Rural Agriculture (A) and Agricultural Special Treatment Overlay (A -ST) to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) pursuant to Ordinance 11-41. The MPUD allows for a maximum of 1,760 dwelling units, 327,500 square feet of commercial retail uses, 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office uses, 135 hotel rooms, 140,000 square feet of business park/educational facilities, a public school, and the Sports Park/swamp buggy attraction. Several areas within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD have been sold and developed. Throughout the development the MPUD has been amended four times to modify development standards and add deviations for sign standards, dead- end streets, and off-street parking standards. Although these amendments were limited to different areas within the MPUD, some of the changes have been repetitive or very closely related. See HEX Decisions 2014-18, 2015-06, 2016- 20, and 2021-33. In 2021, Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc., (Applicant), became the contract purchaser for a 144+/- acre portion of the “North Area” within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD as shown in proposed Exhibit B-3. The Applicant is developing the parcel, known as Hacienda Lakes – North Area, with residential uses as permitted within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. Surrounding Properties The surrounding development pattern consists of a mix of developed and undeveloped residential, commercial, and business park uses, and preserve areas as further described below: FUTURE LAND USE ZONING EXISTING LAND USE NORTH Urban Residential Fringe A; RPUD Cracklin’ Jacks Restaurant; Undeveloped Residential (Willow Run RPUD) SOUTH Urban Residential Fringe MPUD; MPUD Church (First Assembly Ministries PUD); Undeveloped Business Park (Hacienda Lakes MPUD) EAST Urban Residential Fringe MPUD Preserves (Hacienda Lakes MPUD) WEST Urban Residential Subdistrict; Urban Residential Fringe RPUD; PUD; CFPUD; ROW; A; Residential (Club Estates PUD); Residential (Naples Lakes Country Club PUD) Conservation Area (Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project CFPUD); Right-of-Way (Collier Blvd & Canal); Undeveloped Ag Parcel; 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | 2 of 4 B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Permitting\Collier County\PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PUDA\2nd Resubmittal\Cover Letter and Project Narrative.docx Amendments and Justification The Applicant requests several modifications to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD as follows: 1. Removal of the RV Tract throughout the PUD (see revised PUD document). The Applicant is proposing to develop residential uses throughout the North Area which will not leave any room for the development of an RV park. References to this potential use are removed throughout the PUD and from Conceptual Master Plan. 2. Changes to the development standards table (see revised PUD document and Deviation #18): a. A reduction of the side yard setbacks from 6 feet to 5 feet. b. A change to existing setbacks note iii, related to setbacks for corner lots in the Esplanade and Azure residential developments, apply throughout the entirety of the MPUD. This change will allow corner lots in the Isles of Naples at Hacienda Lakes to include only one front yard setback. c. The addition of a new notes #7 & #8 and Deviation #18, associated with the development standards table to eliminate the landscape buffer along the northern property boundary only if the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD or by agreement between both property owners. The Applicant is proposing to reduce the side yard setbacks to allow additional design flexibility and to be consistent with the design of other residential communities within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD and throughout the County. Other communities in Collier County with 5-foot side yard setbacks include: • Naples Villas • Esplanade Naples • Canopy/Buttonwood Preserve • San Marino • Willow Run The reduced secondary front yard setbacks are typical to many master ‐planned, clustered projects and are appropriate in consideration of the low travel speeds on private, internal roadways, and the fact that driveways will not be located in the secondary front yards, thereby eliminating the potential for vehicles to extend into the right‐of‐way. These standards have applied to the Esplanade and Azure residential developments within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD and these changes results in more consistency in development standards throughout the MPUD. Finally, two new notes are added to conditionally remove the requirements for landscape buffers along the northern property boundary. These notes are proposed in order to account for a potential unified development plan between Hacienda Lakes MPUD and the San Marino PUD in the area west of the FPL easement. In the area east of the FPL easement will not be developed as a unified development plan, the development is coordinated with the San Marino PUD, which is also currently proposed to be amended and requests a similar deviation. These added notes are associated with Deviation #18 wh ich requests no buffer required along the northern property line. Additionally, the Willow Run/San Marino PUD is currently proposed to be amended and requests a similar deviation (PL20210001766). In the case that no unified development plan is ever proposed (west of the FPL easement) or the San Marino PUD is not rezoned, then the previously approved setbacks and landscape buffers will apply. 3. The addition of new deviations to modify sign standards (see proposed deviations #14, #15, and #16) a. To increase entry sign height to 12 feet and combined sign area to 128 square feet (64 square feet per sign). b. To allow multiple residential developments to share a single sign (See Revised PUD Document). In terms of the proposed signage, the Applicant has provided exhibits to demonstrate that minimal increase to proposed height consistent with other entry sign heights within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. Proposed sign area is appropriate and will ensure a high-quality design aesthetic, as intended by the Land Development Code. There is significant separation between this property and associated signage and CR 951 due to the 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | 3 of 4 B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Permitting\Collier County\PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PUDA\2nd Resubmittal\Cover Letter and Project Narrative.docx intervening canal. This increased height and sign area will allow for better visibility a nd safety for passing motorists. Since the entrance to the community includes two future planned development areas in addition to the proposed residential development, it is requested that multiple communities share signage in order to ensure safety, clarity to motorists, and to distinguish the North Area from other areas in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. 4. The addition of a new deviation to allow one dead-end street, similar to existing deviation #12 (see proposed deviation #17). The Applicant is proposing one (1) dead‐end street that fully complies with the Fire Code in terms of maximum dead‐end length. The dead‐end segment will service four (4) dwelling units and is proposed due to the expansive preserve areas and associated buffers immediately east of the development footprint as well as the geometry of the subject Property. 5. A change to the Master Plan to modify the boundaries of the Residential (“R”) and Business Park (“BP”) tracts in the “North Area” of the MPUD (see revised Master Plan). The Applicant is proposing to develop a residential community consistent with the allowed uses and development standards (except where deviations are granted) within the “R” tract in the north area of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, however, in order to maximize development of the north area, the boundaries of the “R” and “BP” parcel must be adjusted. Although the boundaries will change, the overall acreages of these parcels will remain unchanged and there are no proposed changes to allowed uses, setbacks or buffers between the two tracts. 6. A change to the Master Plan to relocate a potential access point on the northern boundary of the MPUD, relocate the access point to Collier Blvd., and to modify potential access points to the “BP” tract from the “R” tract and The Lords Way ROW (see revised Master Plan). There are three types of changes to access points. 1) Changes along the north boundary: The northeastern access point is needed to provide legal access to adjacent property owners. This access point will be the location of the proposed replacement easement associated with the Hacienda/Willow Run – Bisecting Easement (VAC) petition (PL20210002687). This interconnection point will not provide direct access to the proposed community but will allow provide an access easement to the future Benfield Road Extension. The northwestern access point is needed to accommodate the potential for a unified plan of development with the Willow Run/San Marino PUD (PL20210001766). 2) Changes along CR951 and Benfield Rd Ext.: No access points along CR951 and Benfield Road extension are removed or added. Changes to these access points are limited to relocation to reflect the anticipated location of each. 3) Changes to the “BP” and “R” tracts. Changes to these access points are required due to the reconfiguration of these tracts. One previously identified potential access point between the “R” and “BP” tracts is removed as it is no longer anticipated, and the access points from The Lord’s Way to the “BP” tract are modified to reflect the anticipated location. Several of the requested modifications are similar to those approved in HEX Decision s 2014-18 and 2016-20. The modified development standards will allow for the protection of public health, safety and welfare, while supporting the Applicant’s proposed mix of lot sizes and dwelling types. The overall MPUD represents a clustered development program with expansive preserve areas in the eastern portions of the project. The subject property’s developable area is immediately adjacent to future public rights ‐of‐way and designated preserve areas to the east, which constrains the development footprint. Please also refer to the enclosed Deviation Narrative that further details the appropriateness of the requested deviations. Application Requirement Waivers Accesses to the subject property is proposed to be provided to via Collier Blvd. and the Benfield Road Extension. No increase in vehicle trips is requested. No increase in density, intensity or any change is allowed uses is requested, therefore the following application requirements were waived during the pre -application meeting on August 10, 2021: 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | 4 of 4 B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Permitting\Collier County\PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PUDA\2nd Resubmittal\Cover Letter and Project Narrative.docx • Traffic Impact Statement (TIS Waiver Letter attached) • Environmental Data • Architectural Renderings • Aerial photographs with FLUCFCS Codes • Historical Survey • School Impact Analysis Review Criteria Please refer to the enclosed Evaluation Criteria attachment for further details regarding the criteria in LDC section 10.02.13 B.5 Conclusion In summary, the proposed PUD amendment will serve allow for Hacienda Lakes North Area entry signage and lot layouts to be designed to a high-quality aesthetic and in a manner consistent with other developments within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The proposed deviations and Master Plan changes will allow for enhanced design flexibility and will not negatively impact public health, safety or welfare. As outlined in the attached application, the proposed amendments are consistent with the LDC and GMP. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (239) 850-8525 or acrespo@rviplanning.com. Sincerely, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Alexis Crespo, AICP Vice President of Planning 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 COMPLETED APPLICATION 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): _________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: ___________ Telephone: _______________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ____________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _______________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. 1140 Virginia Drive Fort Washington PA 19034 (239) 949-2304 jhepler@tollbrothers.com Alexis Crespo, AICP, & Richard Yovanovich, Esq RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture & Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Dr, #305 Bonita Springs FL 34135 (239) 908-3405 (239) 850-8525 acrespo@rviplanning.com & ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: •If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; •The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and •The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)Hacienda Lakes MPUD Hacienda Lakes MPUD Vacant Residential Hacienda Lakes MPUD 11-41 14 50 26 See attached legal description 48586001022 144 East side of Collier Blvd. and approx. 1,675 +/- feet north of The Lord's Way. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)A & RPUD (Willow Run)Vacant Residential (Willow Run RPUD) PUD (First Assembly Ministries) & MPUD (Hacienda Lakes)Vacant Business Park (Hacienda Lakes MPUD) MPUD (Hacienda Lakes)Preserves (Hacienda Lakes MPUD) CFPUD (LASIP) & PUD (Naples Lakes Country Club) & PUD (Club Estates)Preserves (LASIP); Residential (Naples Lakes Country Club); Residential (Club Estates) 14 50 26 48586001022 See attached legal description 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a.The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b.Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at pu blic expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c.Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d.The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which c onditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e.The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f.The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g.The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h.Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to asce rtain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an applicati on “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)No public hearings have been held on this property within the last year. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e.Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)Toll Bros. LLC 2401 Walden Center Dr Bonita Springs FL 34134 (239) 949-2304 jhepler@tollbrothers.com Parcel ID: 48586001022 14 50 26 See attached legal description 48586001022 x Collier County Utilities x Collier County Utilities 1,075 people (430 units x 2.5 persons per unit = 1,075) 150,500 GPD 107,500 GPD 2022 3rd quarter 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)N/A Noted. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Page 8 of 11 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of recor d of property commonly known as ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for ______________ planned unit development (______________PUD) zoning. We hereby designate___________________, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring a nd authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1.The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2.The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3.A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4.All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5.So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek e quitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought in to compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ___________________________________ Owner ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Owner ____________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or online notarization this ____ day of _______________, 20___, by (printed name of owner or qualifier)_________________________________________ Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license ________________ Has produced ______________________ as identification. Notary Signature:_________________________________________ March 4, 2020 Notary Seal 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 1 x 1 x 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:  Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses  Exhibit B: Development Standards  Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code  Exhibit D: Legal Description  Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each  Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00  Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00  Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00  Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)1 x 1 x x x 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00  School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. ___________________________________ _____________ Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date ___________________________________ Printed named of signing party 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)Alexis Crespo HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239.405.7777 • www.rviplanning.com Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI Justification for Requested Deviations Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights‐of‐war for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights‐of way. (APPROVED PER ORD. 11-41) Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. (APPROVED PER ORD. 11‐41) Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow “boundary marker” signage on property corne rs fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for “boundary markers” to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. (APPROVED PER ORD. 11‐41) Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6’) feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8’) feet throughout the development. Where ass ociated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/berm combination. (APPROVED PER ORD. 11‐41) Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the refere nced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord’s Way. (APPROVED PER ORD. 11‐41) Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off‐site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. (APPROVED PER ORD. 11‐ 41) Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast co rner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C . (APPROVED PER ORD. 11‐41) Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. (APPROVED PER ORD. 11‐41) Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E‐2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. (APPROVED PER HEX DECISION 2014‐18) Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. (APPROVED PER HEX DECISION 2016‐20) Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one (1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. (APPROVED PER HEX DECISION 2016‐20) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | 2 of 4 B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Permitting\Collier County\PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PUDA\3rd Minor Resubmittal\Deviation Justification Narrative REV05.docx Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead‐end streets, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3, attached hereto. (APPROVED PER HEX DECISION 2016‐20) Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off‐street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single‐family and two‐family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off‐street parking for multi‐family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit B‐2, attached hereto. (APPROVED PER HEX DECISION 2016‐20) Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. JUSTIFICATION: The Applicant is seeking an increase to allowable entry signage height to ensure visibility of this community in light of its distance from Collier Blvd./CR 951. Collier Blvd. is a six-lane road with a landscaped median/turn lane, posted speeds of 50 mph, and is separated from the Property by an approximately 100-foot canal right-of-way. Increased sign height is necessary to ensure visibility to passing motorists and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The deviation is also intended to allow for flexibility in the type of structure that the sign can be placed upon, such as a wall, platform, or other architectural feature that typically ex ceeds 8 feet in height. This deviation request is consistent with the design of adjacent communities within the overall master planned MPUD/DRI. A similar deviation request has been approved at Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes per HEX Decision 2014‐18, which allowed for a maximum sign height of 13‐feet and at Azure at Hacienda Lakes per HEX Decision 2016-20, which allowed for a maximum sign height of 10-feet. Approval of this deviation will allow for consistent signage and sizing with neighboring projects internal to the MPUD/DRI, which supports the continuity between projects and the cohesive scale of hardscape features within the overall DRI. The setbacks will meet LDC standards, thereby ensuring public health, safety, and welfare is protected. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs with a combined sign area of 128 square feet which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. JUSTIFICATION: The Applicant is requesting additional sign area to ensure visibility of this community in light of its distance from Collier Blvd./CR 951. Collier Blvd. is a six -lane road with a landscaped median/turn lane, posted speeds of 50 mph, and is separated from the Property by an approximately 100-foot canal right-of-way. Increased sign area will ensure better visibility to passing motorists and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The total combined sign area of the main entry signs will not exceed 128 square feet as shown on Exhibit E‐4 Sheet 1 of 2 and is appropriate at the proposed location at the project entrance on Collier Blvd (CR 951), a major arterial roadway. Additionally, the signs will be used to identify multiple residential developments on each sign (the Hacienda Lakes North Area development and two future planned development areas). This allowance for multiple communities on each sign is needed due to the unique characteristics of the Hacienda Lakes North Area. The main access road to this area will be a private road that will not connect to other areas of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, which differs from other entrances to the PUD. Both Hacienda Lakes Parkway and Rattlesnake Hammock are public roads that provide access to several areas throughout the PUD. In contrast, this entrance will lead only to the gated North Area, which is anticipated to be a gated residential development, and the future development areas 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | 3 of 4 B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Permitting\Collier County\PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PUDA\3rd Minor Resubmittal\Deviation Justification Narrative REV05.docx adjacent to Collier Blvd. Allowing for signage specific to the developments of the North Area will decrease confusion for people attempting to enter other areas of the Ha cienda Lakes MPUD. This deviation furthers the goals of the LDC by facilitating a shared access to the public ROW for all three development areas in the Hacienda Lakes North Area. Therefore, identifying each of the communities at the public access point is appropriate. The deviation is necessary to reduce confusion for passing motorists and also allows for design flexibility to incorporate all necessary signage while also enhancing the branding of the communities. This deviation also replicates signage allowed in other areas of the County where multiple communities share entrances within larger developments and is therefore in keeping with the County residents’ experience of this application of the sign code. For example, a sign including multiple residential communities was approved within the Quail Creek Community (Quail II PUD - Ord 14-14). At the time this sign was approved no deviation was needed. The main entry signs will comply with LDC standards regarding setbacks, and design, except where a deviation is granted, and locations of the signs ensure the aesthetic intent of the sign code as well as public health, safety and welfare is upheld. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. JUSTIFICATION: The Applicant is requesting additional sign area to allow for design flexibility and enhance the branding of the individual communities internal to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD master planned development. The total sign area of each boundary marker sign will not exceed 32 square feet, for a total of 64 square feet as shown on Exhibit E-4 Sheet 1 of 2. The locations of the boundary markers are identified on Exhibit E-4 Sheet 1 of 2 and are appropriate at the proposed locations at the property corners of the developmen t. Similar to the entry signs, the boundary markers are separated from Collier Blvd. by a canal and the setbacks will meet LDC standards. The increased sign square footage also allows for improved visibility along an arterial roadway, thereby ensuring public health, safety and welfare is protected. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead‐end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Haciend a Lakes – North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. JUSTIFICATION: The Applicant is requesting one (1) dead‐end stub at the terminus of a proposed private, local street in order to maximize the developable area in light of the geography of the property. The maximum length of the proposed dead‐end street is 150 feet and will service a maximum of 4 (four) dwelling units. The proposed design is in compliance with state and local fire safety standards, as the Collier County Fire Code permits dead ends up to 150 feet in length. This deviation allows for the maximization of development of this tract within the PUD due to the shape and physical characteristics of the parcel. This deviation is suitable to the pattern of development in the area as it reduces the amount of pavement required for a short dead-end street and maintains the development pattern of the area. Similar neighborhood design is also found in other projects within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, such as nearby Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes which has utilized a similar street design (See previously approved Deviation #12, HEX Decision 2016-20). The deviation will not impact access requirements and is accommodated by the community’s drainage, sewer, water, and other utility designs. For these reasons, the requested deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | 4 of 4 B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Permitting\Collier County\PL20210001791 Isles of Naples PUDA\3rd Minor Resubmittal\Deviation Justification Narrative REV05.docx Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture-zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes – North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. JUSTIFICATION: The Applicant is requesting no required buffer along the northern property line to accommodate two different development scenarios. WEST OF THE FPL EASEMENT, this scenario allows for the unified development of both properties. This will require the property to the north Agricultural zoning to be rezoned to allow for a unified development plan of both properties. Future SDP or PPL submittals will be required to demonstrate this unified development. If the adjacent property is not rezoned and developed as a unified development, buffers will be provided as required by this MPUD and the LDC, as applicable. EAST OF THE FPL EASEMENT, this scenario allows for the coordinated development of two separate PUDs. While it is not intended to develop these properties under a single, unified development plan, development of the properties will be coordinated to allow for the existing lakefront in the adjacent development to be expanded to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD’s northern boundary. As a result, the request facilitates the creation of lake views for properties within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. Although a unified development plan is not proposed in this area, the coordination of these two developments is evidenced by a similar deviation request in the recently submitted San Marino-Willow Run PUDR (PL20210001766). LDC Section 4.06.02.A describes the purpose of required buffers as separating residential developments from several other uses. The deviation supports this goal in the area west of the FPL easement since it facilitates the development of a unified development plan, within which, internal buffers would not be desired. Buffers will be provided in accordance with the LDC wherever this unified development plan abuts other uses. East of the FPL easement, the deviation allows for the creation of unobstructed lake views for properties within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The lake ensures a separation of approximately 900 feet or more between the residential areas in each PUD. This lake view, and the significant distance between dwellings, is an enhancement over the 10 -foot Type “A” buffer that is otherwise required by the currently approved Hacienda Lakes MPUD Master Plan. The unobstructed lake views will serve the same purposes of improving the aesthetic appearance of developments in ways that harmonize the natural and built environment, reduces noise and glare, and enhances community identity, while also maximizing the physical and psychological benefits provided by the lakefront. Since both PUDs propose high-quality residential development, there are no visual aspects of the developments which must be shielded from view. In addition to maintaining the intent of the Landscape Code, this deviation maximizes the use and benefit of nearby open space amenity by not shielding properties along the northern boundary from the adjacent lakefront. For these reasons, the requested deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare. Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decor ative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. JUSTFICATION: The proposed wall height will allow for a decorative entry feature that provides aesthetic value to the project and compliments the entry signage design. This height is similar to approvals in nearby projects, such as San Marino and Hammock Park, and will not be out of character with the surrounding area. The wall will be setback from property lines in accordance with the LDC. The proposed design will serve to enhance public health, safety and welfare. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 EVALUATION CRITERIA 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD (PUDA) Review Criteria Page 1 of 4 HACIENDA LAKES MPUD Evaluation Criteria LDC section 10.02.13 B.5 requires the Planning Commission hearing and recommendation to be based on the following criteria: a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject property is located within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, established by Ordinance 11-41 and which has been amended several times by HEX Decisions 2014-18, 2015-06, 2016-20, and 2021-33. The Property is located in an area of existing and planned urban development within the County’s Urban-designated area. The Property is an infill development ideally located within the Urban Residential Fringe future land use category. The subject property is located in an urbanized portion of the County as evidenced by the property’s proximity to Collier Boulevard, a six-lane arterial roadway. The Property is also proximate to existing and approved urban levels of development, as well as major public facilities including schools, hospitals, and libraries. Willow Run RPUD to the north of the Property is approved for a maximum of 590 single-family residential, two-family and multi-family dwelling units according to Ordinance 14-35. The existing swamp buggy track and other residential tracts are located to the south of the Property and within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The Hacienda Lakes “BP” tract is intended to be located between the subject property and the swamp buggy tract to function as a buffer between the two uses within the MPUD. To the east of the Property is the Benfield Road extension and Hacienda Lakes MPUD preserve tracts. The First Assembly Ministries PUD is located south and west of the property and includes a church and multi-family development (Milano Lakes). According to Ordinance 99-59, TTRVC Park campsites, up to 12 units per acre, multi-family residential development up to 1.5 units per acre (57 units max) and adult Living Facility and Care Unit Facilities are allowed in the PUD. The Property is bounded to the west by Collier Blvd. and further by Serenity Park, within the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project. To the northwest, the Club Estates PUD allows 49 dwelling units for a maximum of 0.19 dwelling units per acre. To the southwest, the Naples Lakes Country Club PUD allows for 110,000 square feet of commercial and office space and 785 dwelling units for a maximum of 1.67 dwelling units per acre. The surrounding PUD approvals demonstrate the appropriateness of this request to provide an infill housing project in an area with existing and planned development at similar densities. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD (PUDA) Cover Letter & Request Narrative Page 2 of 4 The subject property will be accessed by Collier Blvd a County Maintained arterial roadway, and the Benfield Road Extension, a private road owned by Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC. The Benfield Road Extension will be constructed to County standards and conveyed to the County as required by the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The Property is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s (CCWSD) service area and water and wastewater service are readily available via existing facilities. A statement of availability from the Collier County Public Utilities Departments is enclosed as part of this application. Based upon the nature of surrounding uses, the established development pattern along Collier Blvd., and the existing levels of public infrastructure available, the Property is suitable for the development of a residential community as proposed through this application. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The subject property is under Unified Control by Toll Brothers, LLC, who has filed this application, as demonstrated by the Covenant of Unified Control included in the PUDA application. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed changes maintain the project’s consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. More specifically, the following FLUE Policies were identified by staff during review of the most recent PUD insubstantial amendment related to HEX Decision 2016- 20: FLUE Policy 5.6: “New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, and effective October 18, 2004, as amended).” The proposed change does not alter the development’s compatibility with surrounding land uses as no changes to the previously approved uses, intensities, or acreage are modified. FLUE Policy 7.1: “The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code.” The previously approved PUD Master Plan depicted connection points at Collier Blvd. (CR 951) to the west, and to the future Benfield Road extension to the east. This application does not propose to remove any connections to collector or arterial roads. FLUE Policy 7.2: “The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals.” 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD (PUDA) Cover Letter & Request Narrative Page 3 of 4 Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI includes several public roads throughout the development which provide access to other areas of the PUD without the need to travel onto Collier Blvd. This application does not propose any change to those internal roads. FLUE Policy 7.3: “All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element.” Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI includes several internal roads which provide connection between adjoining neighborhoods, including Hacienda Lakes Blvd. (FKA The Lords Way), Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. and the planned Benfield Road extension. This request does not modify or eliminate any of these roads or connections. FLUE Policy 7.4: “The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types.” This application is consistent with this policy as it does not include any changes to the previously approved uses, intensity, or open space. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in this application, the PUDA does not propose to change any of the allowed residential uses within the MPUD. The proposed modifications to the “R” and “BP” tract boundaries are intended to better incorporate previously approved uses in the MPUD. Required setbacks and buffers are not proposed to change, except where developed as a unified development plan with the Willow Run RPUD. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The PUDA does not propose any changes to the open space requirements of the MPUD. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. As outlined in the enclosed application, all required public infrastructure is available and adequate to service the proposed RPUD. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. This PUDA application to does not propose to areas outside the existing MPUD boundary. There are also no proposed increases in vehicular trips or changes to the previously approved uses. All changes proposed in this application are limited to within the previously approved boundaries of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD (PUDA) Cover Letter & Request Narrative Page 4 of 4 h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed development is generally consistent with the PUD regulations contained in the LDC. The Applicant is requesting several deviations from the LDC in order to support the infill development project. Development of the property in accordance with these deviations will uphold the intent of the MPUD regulations and ensure design consistency, internal connectivity, and integration of dwelling types, appropriate vehicular circulation, and the protection of public health, safety and welfare. Further explanation and justification of the deviations are provided in the attached list of deviations. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 ORIGINAL PUD DOCUMENT AND SUBSEQUENT HEX DECISIONS 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Sg1 ®11 12', T c, p N a ORDINANCE NO. 11- 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCEC` ZgZ5Zi72c` J/ NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) AGRICULTURAL- SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (A -ST) AND PUD ZONING DISTRICT SWAMP BUGGY DAYS PUD) TO THE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS THE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD THAT WILL ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS RETAIL COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA; 70,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE INCLUDING A CONVERSION OF RETAIL USE TO PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE; 135 HOTEL ROOMS INCLUDING A CONVERSION TO BUSINESS PARK; 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK OR EDUCATION FACILITY; A PUBLIC SCHOOL; CONTINUATION OF EXISTING "SWAMP BUGGY" ATTRACTION AND "JUNIOR DEPUTY" PASSIVE RECREATION; AND A MAXIMUM OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS INCLUDING CONVERSIONS TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK AND SENIOR HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING AND NURSING CARE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 2,262 +/- ACRES IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE- HAMMOCK ROAD AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 84 -26 FOR SWAMP BUGGY GROUNDS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., Robert Mulhere of Mulhere and Associates and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Page] of3 BCC Approved 10/25/11 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agricultural (A), Agricultural- Special Treatment Overlay (A -ST) and PUD zoning district (Swamp Buggy Days PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the 2,262 +/- acre project to be known as the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, to allow a maximum of 327,500 square feet of gross retail commercial floor area; 70,000 gross square feet of professional and medical office space; 135 hotel rooms; 140,000 gross square feet of business park or education facility; continuation of existing "swamp buggy" attraction and "Junior Deputy" passive recreation; and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units in accordance with the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 84 -26, the Swamp Buggy PUD, is hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super- majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 25`h day of October, 2011. ATTEST: D WICcI (CLERK t. By: PU DZ- 2006 -Ak -16 i 4-6'-- BCC Approved 10/25/11 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 2 of 3 FRED W. COYLE, Ch&rinan 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: i ', ,4- - - 0((2 Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A – Permitted Uses Exhibit B – Development Standards Exhibit C – Master Plan Exhibit D – Legal Description Exhibit E - List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F - List of Owner Commitments Exhibit G – Master Use and Conversion List CP\ ] 0- CPS - 01024\ 118 This ordinance s! ,,' with Secretary of ., ll3i?t day of and acknowledgeme pf that filinga received ti,isi day of py- - Deputy lerlc Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Page 3 of 3 BCC Approved 10/25/11 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE+ TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30 %) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. II TRACT "R ". RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi- family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle (RV) units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two - family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 1 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Multi- family dwellings; Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north /south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non - commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; Private stables on single - family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. III TRACT "RV ": Up to 290 RV units are allowed only if residential units are converted to RV in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 2 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) A. Principal Uses: Recreational vehicle parks (Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to the criteria contained in Exhibit B, and only in the location depicted on Exhibit C. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. Except as provided herein, the RV District shall comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) including Sections 2.03.031 and 5. 5.10. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; IV TRACT "R/MU ", RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi - family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two - family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Multi - family dwellings; Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 3 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services, (Groups 8011 -8049, 8071 -8072, 8082, and 8092 - 8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ( "BZA ") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. V TRACT `BP" BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract "BP" is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI below shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311- 2399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 4 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 2. Building construction (groups 1521- 1542); 3. Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812 -4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711- 1799); 6. Depository and non - depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833 - 2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk -up windows and drive - thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221- 8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511- 2599); 14. Government offices /buildings (groups 9111 -9222, 9224 -9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 -9532, 9611- 9661); 15. Health services (groups 8011- 8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131- 3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812- 3873); 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092,8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911- 3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812- 7819); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 5 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing ( group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll -up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right -of -way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non - direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711- 2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043 -5049, 5063 -5078, 5091, 5092, 5094 - 5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111 -5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192 - 5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334 -7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371 -7384, 7389); 2. Child day care services (group 8351); 3. Depository and non - depository institutions (groups 6021 -6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories /research /rehabilitative groups; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 6 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services (groups 7215 -7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311 - 6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712- 6799); attorneys (group 8111); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off - street parking shall be as required for a single - family residence. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. VI TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical- related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 7 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi - family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed -use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising — miscellaneous (group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911 -7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611- 5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211 -5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages - automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 — 7533, 7536 - 7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction — General contractors (groups 1521 — 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211- 5261); 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153- 6159); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 8 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 24. Business services (groups 7311 -7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371 -7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382 -7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive -away automobile, exhibits - building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats- decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812 -4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction — special trade contractors (groups 1711 — 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011- 6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 — 8249); 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411 - 5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331 - 5399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 9 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011 -8049, 8051 -8059, 8071 -8072, 8082 and 8092 - 8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712 - 5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311 -6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741 -8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611- 8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 — 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912 -5963, 5992 - 5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self - storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non - depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111- 6163); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711- 8713); 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 10 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221 -7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios (7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); 68. Political organizations ( group 8651); 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111 -9199, 9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 -9532, 9611- 9661); 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531- 6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731- 8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- 7929); 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (43 11 except major distribution center); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 1 1 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools ( groups 8243 - 8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five -foot, six -inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT "A" ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 12 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 3. Exhibition hall /community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator- related facilities; 6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Fuel storage and related facilities. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 13 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) VIII TRACT "P" PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. IX TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. X TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 14 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non- motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and /or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms /bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). XI TRACT "S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 15 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; Administrative offices and support service facilities; Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; Recreational facilities. XII SIGNS: A. Seven, on- premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled "Boundary Marker" on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 16 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and /or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi - family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi - family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 17 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 2. 73 Recreational Vehicle units /spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi - family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single- family units, and 1,056 multi - family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The 1,760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi- family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single - family dwelling unit equates to 1 single - family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 18 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; There shall be an onsite manager /activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a combination of both. The RV Park shall be limited to Class A motorcoaches only. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. The density of the RV park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the development parcel [not less than 20 acres]. The Lord's way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard (CR -951). A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially zoned or developed parcel. Sign Development Standards Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. Any signage proposed for identifying the on -site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development, or Plat Approval At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 19 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE ZERO LOT TWO TOWNHOUSE MULTI- CLUB RECREAT- FAMILY LINE FAMILY/ FAMILY HOUSE/ IONAL DETACHED DUPLEX DWELLINGS REC- VEHICLE REATION PARKS BLDGS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 800 SF per lot 10,000 SF space/unit Minimum Lot Width 40' 35' 35' per lot 18'per lot or 150' 35' unit N/A 15' or '/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' or % BH, 15' or '/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' Minimum Distance From whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20' 20' or '/2 BH, 10' with side with side with side whichever is Front Yard Setback load garages load garages load garages greater. N/A Side Yard 6' 0' or 10' 0' or 6 0' or 6' 1/1 BH 5' N/A Rear Yard 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' or '/2 BH, 8' whichever is greater N/A From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25 Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' 30' Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' 35' Floor Area Minimum SF 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance 15' or 1/2 10' Between 12' 10' 12' 12' Yz SBH SBH, Principal Structures whichever is greater ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10' SPS From Preserve 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Minimum Distance 10' Between Accessory Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Minimum Distance 0' OR 10' Between Accessory and Principle Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPSLSPSSPSSPS35' SPS Minimum Distance From 15' or'' /2 BH 15' or' /2 BH 15' or'' /2 BH 15' or'' /] BH 15' or %: BH 15' or'' /2 BH MPUD Boundary" whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is reater reater reater eater eater eater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back Of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N /A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 20 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi - family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15 -foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. PPo Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 21 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) PRESERVE ) 5' E STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY - STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 1 FROM PRESERVE I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK ACC SM. . FROM PRESERVE 1 1 i 1 8' MIN. 12' MIN 6' MIN. 6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE 1 I TYP.) I I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I 15' i FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 MIN. 20' MIN.- 23' MIN. I STRUCTURE SETBACK ROW L 5' SIDEWALK- - BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE i - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 2 Detached Single - Family Units i PRESERVE 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY 01-1-1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY - -- -- r--- ---- - - -- - STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 FROM PRESERVE I 1 I 1 1 I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I ACC. STR. STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I 1 1 I 1 I I 10' MIN. 10' MIN, 10' MIN. _O' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 1 1 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL I 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE 1 I I I 1 TYP-) 1 I 1 I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I I I I T AKSTRUCTURESETBACK1I120' 213' I IRPRI SETBAC 15, MIN. MI . IROW MIL 5' SIDEWALK BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE i - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 3 Detached Single- Family /Zero Lot Line Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 22 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) PRESERVE 1, 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY i/`/ i!16C URE SMACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY ---- -- --- - -I -- ---- --- STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 1 1 FROM PRESERVE I I i I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I I I STRUCTURE SETBACK STRUCTURE SETBACK I ACC. STR I ACC. STR FROM PRESERVE I I 1 I I I i I I 1 NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS MIN. 12' MIN. i 1 1 PRINCIPAL I STRUCTURE 6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 23' MIN. I I (TYP) STRUCTURE SETBACK FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I I STRUCTURE SETBACK i I 15' MIN. ROW 5' SIDEWALK — BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERUNE — --" — ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE I I1.77 N I I NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 4 Duplex and Two - Family Units MOW STIRUCTURE SETBACK 5' Sinn BACK OF CURB— CENTERLINE— I ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 PRESERVE 1 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY i STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I I I I I I I I SIDE FOR 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I I ATTACHEDYPRIINC PALI UNITS STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 12' 1 1 MIN. PRI IPA ST; RE PRINCIPAL J. STRUCTURErEE i MOW STIRUCTURE SETBACK 5' Sinn BACK OF CURB— CENTERLINE— I ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) PRESERVE TRACT UNE- 10 FOOT MINIMUM .../ J.J J _ _ — \_ _ ACCESSORY ( SE FROM PRESERVE — — — _ _ — _ _ -- — — 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT MDU M—} SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 7RACT LINEN 5' Sic BACK OF ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 6 Multi- Family Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 SETBACK 15' MIN. REAR YAM PRINCIPAL T7 STRUCTURESETBACK OF THE BUI DM Page 24 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE II COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR %: THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER * ** 10 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES * * ** 25 FEET 10 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET * * * ** 25 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET * * * ** 30 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SENIOR HOUSING MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET ** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET ** 80 SQUARE FEET ** Whichever is greater Not applicable to kiosks General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single - family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single- family land uses set forth in Table I. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 25 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET * ** 10 FEET BOUNDARY) — BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) — SCHOOL 50 FEET * ** 25 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD N/A N/A BOUNDARIES PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES - BUSINESS PARK BUILDING HEIGHTS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN or 18 FEET 10 FEET STRUCTURES- SCHOOL MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK 35 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT — BUSINESS PARK 50 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 60 FEET 60 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — BUSINESS PARK 1000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SCHOOL or 350 SQUARE FEET 35 SQUARE FEET MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK 500 SQUARE FEET 80 SQUARE FEET SCHOOL N/A N/A Whichever is greater General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B -4, a Commercial/Industrial typical roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix B -3, a Local Street typical roadway section. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 26 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER 50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR %Z THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET ** N/A Whichever is greater Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 27 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) og' r s9mmoDgZFZ. IT =m500Zf9iemso Exhibit C7F L 55 9 j s o fr lit i3 M N uM M N M n ev ° °sue ply lip S A,X a 54 sass o a I €€ InR(H 2flln Cf 4. 5r X1.11E HAciE rew[tT. CIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES mc c OVERALL MPUD/DRI CONSUL IN QvdHo eaa r, MPUD/DRI i I& ..a sus" oM.v MASTER PLAN .,o ....°,....:m.,..>,. 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 402Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89 °10'42 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 01 I'14 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89 009'39 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °I 1'01 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 °13'35 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 014'15 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87 °07'13 "E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01 °08'02 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 012'28 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01 °04'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'21 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 0 18'52 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89 022'00 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 ° 14'38 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01 °01'15 "W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00 °51'54 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 °48'00 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °31'38 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °48'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'42 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00 °48'45 "E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 29 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE 5. 87 °27'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00 °49'30 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00 050'27 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87 °28'56 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235. 95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.00 °49'13 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °47'37 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °27'14 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 047'14 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'42 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87 °30'06 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °38'50 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00 °4 1'44 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °40'34 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °36'23 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87 °26'11 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °35' 02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345. 93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 030'06 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 038'50 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °32'03 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °35'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °33'59 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 038'51 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.87 °37'27 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °42'40 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °40'54 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE 5.00 °56'29 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °34'58 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °4 1'32 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °41'38 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 026'32 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 30 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE 5.87 033'18 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °34'02 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88 °12'42 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03 °39'20 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88 °56'10 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE 5.87 007'20 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °07'13 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03 °18'31 "E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88 056'54 "E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE 5.00 °31'35 "E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89 °15'59 "E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 037'14 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 034'43 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00 041'48 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 023'00 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35 "E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00 °52'45 "E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 046'12 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 049'34 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 ° 12'08 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00 °59' 10 "W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 022'35 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °55' 57 "E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89 °46'12 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °40'10 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 017'48 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 056'29 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 31 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °23'02 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 000'20 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 32 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.0l.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights -of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall /berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C.5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and /or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 33 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. LEGAL A. Access to Parcel "A ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90 -days of approval of this PUD. B. Access to Parcel "B ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress /egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C. No existing public access /roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description Total Urban ac Rural ac Project Area 2262.14 625.07 1637.07 On -Site Native Vegetation 1721.97 295.38 1426.59 Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. 2.02 2.02 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext. 0.42 0.42 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor 12.91 5.01 7.90 Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves 6.07 1.06 5.02 Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1700.54 286.87 1413.67 Percentage for required Native Preserve 25% Required Native Vegetation* 921.09 71. 71 849.38 Preserved Native Vegetation ** 1395.35 40.81 1352.57 Compensating Native Preserve 2x URF Deficit)" 61.80 Total Preserve Area 1544.14 53.06 1491.08 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 34 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for County review. C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement. D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to the next development order approval. E. Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to the first preliminary acceptance. III ENGINEERING A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 over the Henderson Creek Canal. IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. B. Historical /archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an archaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed. V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A. In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility site is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit Q. The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no later than at the time the 500`h residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 35 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA I. The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance "), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request. ") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 36 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Figure 1— Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment I II. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 37 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Fiture 2 — Hacienda Lakes DRi - Commkment 11 III. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 38 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50 %) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site - related improvement. Flaure 3 — Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment 111 NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 39 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Figure 4 — Hacienda lakes SRI - Commitment IV rl__„, Residential Pod C I 6 S 1%_1 Florida Power Line Easement Rattlesnake 7 Residential Residential Pod B 17, 14PodA \ I L Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes — — L Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed /Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed j_ Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site - related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 40 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. Residential Pod C Florida Power Une Easement Residential" x; Pod r ttt ry Residential r. Pod A 1mid to Existing Lanes/Turn lanes Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed /Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed Residential Pod B k \ c When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 41 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent 50 %) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site - related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 42 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Florida Power line Easement Resksendal`' Pod C v Resdential Pod ; Residential Pod E The lad' Rattlesnaft Hammock 1 i g ResldeMisl ` _ Pod B Pod A `k IV 'Xna g Lanes/Tum Lanes L ianrt/Twn Lanes to be Canuructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Prevlou* Dew4oped Area to be Developed VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 43 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes ON - Florida Power Line Easement to Residenttai ` ' I Residents Pod D Residential Pod E VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site - related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 Ratdemm Mammal; Rpa4wension Netider ttal Pod B Pod A Lti>i ti y E sLsueg Larvra/Tum Lanes L Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructed/Reconst..ted Roadway Segment Previously Corntrutud r_ Riet of Way to be Preserved Atea PteviocMy Developed Area to be Developed VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site - related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) IX. As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or 2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site - related contributions. X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site - related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 45 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right -of -way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop /shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site - related contribution. XII. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop /shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site - related contribution. XIII. DRI traffic studies identified an off -site impact at the interchange of I -75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound ( northbound) I -75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build -out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 46 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 47 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Proposed Acest" Proposed \ Acmes RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RQ, 1 1 1 Ch / U / W / J / O / M / d' W J J O LoWnd CAT STOPISHELTER Proposed CAT Routs 4A 8 48 Extension Existing CAT Rouse 4A 8 48 Q Exbung CAT Fadkty 4A 10 Exis" CAT Facility 48 Exi"CAT Routs 7 Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Exabrig Shared Use Pah pProject Boundary Development Boundary EXISTING CAT ROUTE 7 i (TO MARCO ISLAND) DEVELOPER 1 PROPOSED CAT STOP /SHELTER, THE LORD'S WAY POTENTIAL CAT STOP /SHELTER/ PROPOSED 4A 3 48 CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER PROPOSED CAT STOP/SHELTE 1 PROP. RATTLESNAK HAMMOCK RD. EX1 Land Use Attraction Tract Business Park or School Commercial Preserve Tract Public Fadities Trad (EMS) Junior Deputy School Residential Trad Residential i Medical Use Public ROW Reservation pedaWlan Fadlities VWU as Extended Along AN Internal Ras" Even it Not Shown POTENTIAL CAT STOP/SHELTER EXISTING CAT ROUTE 4A aeiStles WWI as Alerq AB Wornal Roads K Not shown EX13TING CAT ROUTE 4A 348\ evneTrun_ CAT CAT W FACILITY FACILITY 4A (TYP) 48 (TYP) I Hacienda Lakes d Fea Master Mobility Plan STATE LANDS 1?A '1IA " is i a- P—Or_, r+...o oe.: ear e. mro c,,. na 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water -Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water -Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield- SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 11:00 P.M. B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 49 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets ( provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non - potable uses. X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close -out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD /DRI commitments until close -out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 50 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP \10- CPS - 01024 \119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 51 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) i w 0 UtiQOHti amaFQtxW Qz Z a WWd Wrn AWr>~ app Azd xwa W o oC) w H C) a U v w a Q D z w W a rs awl a w 0 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) O 4 a O w cn a w o w H x w a C7 Q a H H d w xx UU dd W w O z xx co 33 Q zW wo 5 C4 U v H z w x U d d 0 N 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP / PLAT / BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [ UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI - FAMILY] MANDATED UNITS BY GMP: NON - MANDATED UNITS: REDUCED BY: 1. 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI - FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT = 2.73 RV UNITS 3. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON - MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI - FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT ARE DEVELOPED] TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT RESIDENTIAL] TOTAL: 1,760 CONVERSIONS: UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM 3 of 5 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 140,000 92,000 BP DISTRICT: A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES RETAIL OFFICE BP HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) OR B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL - RELATED USES ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] TRACT C: 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; 1. DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4of5 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES 1. DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [MAY HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 5of5 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2011 -41 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 25th day of October, 2011, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 28th day of October, 2011. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex- officio to Board, of....._r ti• County Commissio7si ••,RS•, 3 ' r, r z By: Martha VercYa, Deputy Cle' k;8 ",L -` V • V lte' 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HEX NO. 2014— 18 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000973 — Petitioner, Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, to add a deviation to allow one wall sign with a maximum height of thirteen feet at the entrance to a residential development known as Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes. The subject property is located approximately one-half mile east of the intersection of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING:July 10, 2014 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant, and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition should be approved. ANALYSIS: Phase I of the Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes was originally approved on July 9th, 2013 as a plans and plat (PPL) submittal (#2012-2539). Page 7 of that PPL submittal plan set delineates the location of a typical wall (noted as 6 feet to 8 feet) and "project signage", which appears in the general location requested by this PDI application. Following the PPL submittal, a permit dated January 7th, 2014 (PRBD2013123118601) was applied for and approved for an entry monument and columns. The submittal included 7 pages of plans showing the construction details of the sign structure with the sign copy that was to be applied. By the plans provided, it was the intention of this entry feature to coincide with the sign location on the PPL submittal, which was also referenced. The plan set indicated a height of the sign structure at 13 feet, which is greater than the maximum 8 foot height allowed in the Land Development Code. This application was approved with the staff comment that "... a separate permit is required for the sign." During the hearing on this PDI request, the sign plans reviewer, Diana Compagnone, testified that a sign also includes the structure to which it is applied and when asked if this includes to the 13 foot height shown on the permit submittal the response was affirmative. Ms. Compagnone was not one of the permit reviewers for this plan set. Page 1 of 3 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) A separate permit (#PRBD20140409427-01) was submitted on April 14th, 2014 requesting approval of the sign copy that was to be applied to the 13 foot sign structure. On May 7th, 2014, the permit for the sign was approved. The PDI request, which is the subject of this hearing, did not occur until July 10th, 2014. This sign was permitted over 2 months prior to a required public process and hearing for final determination. In order to permit the sign without such PDI approval, the applicant was asked to provide a signed statement acknowledging "...to allow the lettering to be placed on the existing wall at the developer's risk It is also understood that if the PDI application is not approved, the sign lettering will have to be removed, or the sign height must be reduced to the maximum height of 8 feet as set forth in the LDC. " This is referred to as an "at-risk" letter. On July 9th, 2014 a site review was conducted by this Examiner, during which it first became known to this Examiner that the sign copy had already been installed. During the hearing, the Zoning Director, under direct questioning from the Hearing Examiner, was asked if there were any provisions in our Land Development Code that allowed such "at- risk" approvals and his response was that after research he had found none, but such letters were created by policy. When asked if this policy was approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the Zoning Director stated not to his knowledge. In the Hearing Examiner's opinion, lacking a clear allowance for the use of "at-risk" letters within the LDC or a policy direction from the Board of County Commissioners, such "at-risk" letters are inconsistent with the intent of our code and frustrate the quasi-judicial process that is established for such approvals. Further review of this PDI application found two other clarifications needed. The first is the reference throughout the application to the sign being requested as a wall sign. Upon discussion with staff and the applicant it was determined that a more appropriate reference to this type of sign would be to call it a"ground" sign. Within the staff report there are two different versions of the language to be used for Deviation 9. It was determined and agreed by staff and the applicant that the deviation #9 version dated June 6th, 2014 would be the version used for this hearing with the added correction that the reference to the "wall sign"be changed to "ground sign". DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20140000973, filed by Alexis Crespo, AICP, of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., representing Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., with respect to the property as described in Exhibit A, for an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, to add a deviation to allow one ground sign with a maximum height of thirteen feet at the entrance to a residential development known as Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes. Said changes are fully described in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Amendment and Location Map attached as Exhibit B. Page 2 of 3 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Legal Description Exhibit B—MPUD Amendment and Location Map LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. fi- IS , 2 01 o Date Mar. Strain, Hearing Examiner Appr ved as to form and legality: CiA) H idi As ton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney 14-CPS-01323/20 Page 3 of 3 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2435 Exhibit"A" HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT A A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE 4 INCH SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENT REFERENCED IN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD NUMBER 84343 MARKING THE EAST ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE ALONG THE EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23,SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS O ; 4;'' 4 S DESCRIPTION, S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 30.03 FEET iii`, ''e ON -:'S WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD RO fivr • THE POINT OF 'ING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING • • (, , c { AR! R SECTION LINE, S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 1,298.4: : q e; • :" '•_•N 'Til "y CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHEA` + ••RNER OF THE 1R Sit ' •NE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTS' AID SECTION %w LIT v ' ALONG THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST LINES OF '• ORTHEAST 0 e+• :'TER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER 0 L•• ! n-! .°t-'V • ' QUARTER THE FOLLOWING THREE(3)COURSES:E CI1 1. THENCE S.01°18'52"W.,FOR 679.65 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 2. THENCE S.89°22'00"W.,FOR 663.28 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 3. THENCE N.01° 14'38"E.,FOR 675.75 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER AND A POINT ON SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 664.25 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 627.16 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF N.01°01'15"E.,FOR 1,699.99 FEET TO A 5/ 8"IRON ROD; THENCE S.88°58'45"E.,FOR 445.48 FEET; 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2436 41 III THENCE N.01°01'15"E.,FOR 400.00 FEET; THENCE S.88° 58'45"E.,FOR 151.77 FEET; THENCE N.01°01'15"E.,FOR 457.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXTENSION AND A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX(6)COURSES: 1. THENCE EASTERLY 268.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 949.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'55"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.82°44'27"E.FOR 267.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2. THENCE EASTERLY 297.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°22' 07"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.88° 49'03"E.FOR 294.05 FEET TO A POINT OF COMP k I NIP it ; .4:A ; 3. THENCE EASTERLY 211.21 P I • `G 'I !' • A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RAD Id ` 2 1,040.00 FEET I' N i A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I 1°38'09"AND BEING SUB , 1aBY A ' : '-• I C B • ' S.71°10'49"E.FOR 210.84 FEET TO A POINT •) ' 4,-4., €"--i' •- - 4. THENCE EASTERLY 54. : 4 t YLI ,F T • • VERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A ' • I .• 'T•y„' ,0 19. ..1 1• x, 11 1 • ; ENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°00'44"AND BEING SUB ' -'''ED BY A CHO' v ` 1 +`' • • S.78° 52'07"E.FOR 541.84 FEET; Vii' 5. THENCE N.87°37'31"E.,FO', $ FEET TO A POI 0; ••• URVATURE; 6. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ' ' "a. _ • - ---A,' • 'C OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A '•-.'TT-L 61 e :• FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°57'2T'AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.46°53'48"E.FOR 71.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD ROAD AND A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR(4)COURSES: 1. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 955.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,160.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°11'39"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.25°00'56"E. FOR 928.70 FEET; 2. THENCE S.48°36'46"E.,FOR 641.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 3. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 909.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°04'53"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.23°34'19"E.FOR 880.38 FEET; 4. THENCE S.01°28'07"W.,FOR 239.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Amend Ordinance Number 11-41 AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT E OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 11-41,THE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD. The"List of Requested Deviations from LDC," labeled Exhibit E of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, is hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Exhibit B Page 1 of 4 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B, related to streets in subdivisions,that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights-of-way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights-of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation#4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2.that limits fence or wall heights to six(6') feet,to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm,or wall/berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2.,that would be erected off-site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45,to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E-2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. Hacienda Lakes PDI Words stfuek-thfe+gil are deleted; Page 1 of 1 Last Revised:June 6,2014 Words underlined are added Exhibit B Page 2 of 4 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) ATTACHMENT E-1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 NORTH P41 7 e7 2,s,„...._______ 1-- ENTRY SIGN D ' 4 PRUJECT 18 DRI SITE BOUNDARY RA 4 C t---,,- .iir till 1111111rlip:,-.1 Cit ) i 1I 1_ 22 111 20 SA41,pA4IROAD 1 t .' 7:-: 1..J [ Exhibit B Page3of4 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 1; 11 4. M 1 I} R 1 1 1 gig... I ' I 41/4. ,. I i Is; it I 1, 1: 1: i ilii II II 1 I 11 3 1; 1; 3 M0 1 1 I _ A 1 1 3 V` r IEI i4 tM i#[ I I r 1 0 , 1; 4I 1 1 1 J w i 3 i s L 1 I1311IAINI I Z s; ter- r zr• f 1 O cc rn iJ F j LLI CU 7 . ii rt., VII%...*...,,, 7: 0.2...: I If CJ 4., a I 1 I i TI 4 ill 1 / Q I r 0 q r t+ r II 1 Q iV 1 `, • , ..: NJ a i t rr r tlr a r1 1 w i, + 11 s el; rf; r ssjr o d-_ Li 1 6iS 1I1 F/ i/ 11 1j1 1a11i' I1 Ii 1 . t x - I «. j ut 1 R ii114111\I kl 14 CC t i '1111 co) lI I IIIt = 11 LU I11' 1 J I I f 1, cd r I 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes HEX NO. 2015—06 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140002801 — Petitioner, Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, to reduce the front yard setback for secondary front yards on residential corner lots from 20 feet to 10 feet for the residential development known as Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes. The subject property is located approximately one-half mile east of the intersection of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road CR 864) in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING:February 26, 2015. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20140002801, filed by Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., representing Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., with respect to the property as described in the attached Exhibit A, for an insubstantial change to reduce the front yard setback for secondary front yards on residential corner lots from 20 feet to 10 feet for the residential development known as Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes. Said change is fully described in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD amendment attached as Exhibit B, and is subject to the conditions set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes legal description Exhibit B —Hacienda Lakes MPUD amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A. CONDITIONS: 1. This insubstantial change is only applicable to residential lots within the Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes development. 2. Limited to secondary front yards on corner lots only. Secondary front yards are those that do not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the garage, dwelling unit or lot. 15-CPS-01405/1150948/1]27 1 of 2 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. c IA Date Mark Strain, Hearing Examiner Approved as to form and legality: Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney US-CPS-01405/1150948/1127 2 of 2 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2435 Exhibit"A" HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT A A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE 4 INCH SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENT REFERENCED IN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD NUMBER 84343 MARKING THE EAST ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE ALONG THE EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23,SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS 0. je IS DESCRIPTION, S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 30.03 FEET T P'ON 15° RE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD RO 1 • P THE POINT OF G I ING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; la_ '~--•-- THENCE CONTINUING • CO; `•• r • P r • : W AR! R SECTION LINE, S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 1,298.4 .J: 1 1;i oN ' • it ' MN; CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHEA T'"aORNER OF THE 4,41R ' ' :' •NE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTS '' AID SECTION fit, . 1. • ' ALONG THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST LINES OF ttli ORTHEAST 0 047 TER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER 0 =`A li ! N.1- rf `• ' QUARTER THE FOLLOWING THREE(3)COURSES: 1E-1, C III- " 1. THENCE S.01°18'52"W.,FOR 679.65 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 2. THENCE S.89°22'00"W.,FOR 663.28 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 3. THENCE N.01°14'38"E.,FOR 675.75 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER AND A POINT ON SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 664.25 FEET TO A 5/ 8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 627.16 FEET TO A 5/ 8"IRON ROD MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF N.01°01'15"E.,FOR 1,699.99 FEET TO A 5/ 8"IRON ROD; THENCE S.88°58'45"E.,FOR 445.48 FEET; 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2436 THENCE N.01°01'15"E.,FOR 400.00 FEET; THENCE S.88°58'45"E.,FOR 151.77 FEET; THENCE N.01° 01' 15"E.,FOR 457.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXTENSION AND A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX(6)COURSES: 1. THENCE EASTERLY 268.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 949.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°1T55"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.82°44'27"E. FOR 267.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2. THENCE EASTERLY 297.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°22'07"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.88°49'03"E.FOR 294.05 FEET TO A POINT OF COMP e r • 0V, #; z• •l: ; 3. THENCE EASTERLY 211.21 PO,..... • G T'` A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RAD A 9 1,040.00 FEET T U 9 A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°38'09"AND BEING SUB P,. :_ - : '-0 ' C` B: • ' S.71°10'49"E.FOR 210.84 FEET TO A POINT •i ' A- ' k--- Ai rk 4. THENCE EASTERLY 54•.8' `' 1 • • VERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A ' • : '• ' L ,O 1T`+ G"•A ENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°00'44"AND BEING SUB 'ED BY A CHO' C =; • 'S S.78°52'07"E. FOR 541.84 FEET; 4. Q 5. THENCE N.87°37'31"E.,FO Cram FEET TO A PO P; • URVATURE; 6. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ' '+N a • C OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A v,I 4'' t)I is :i FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 57'22"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.46°53'48"E.FOR 71.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD ROAD AND A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR(4)COURSES: 1. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 955.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,160.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°11'39"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.25°00'56"E. FOR 928.70 FEET; 2. THENCE S.48°36'46"E.,FOR 641.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 3. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 909.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°04'53"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.23°34'19"E.FOR 880.38 FEET; 4. THENCE S.01°28'07"W.,FOR 239.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Exhibit B Page 1 of 3 Hacienda Lakes MPUD Amend Ordinance 11-41 The "Table I Residential Development Standards," under Exhibit B, Development Standards"of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, is hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Exhibit B-1, "Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Project Location Map,"attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i.If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii.If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. iii. For corner lots, only one (1) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10' setback. This setback applies only to single family detached, zero lot line, and two family/duplex dwelling types with a maximum zoned building height of 35' within the Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes property, as depicted on Exhibit B-1, attached hereto. At the time of platting, intersections subject to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05 Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi-family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; Last Revised: March 5, 2015 Words underlined are added 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) B_1 Exhibit B ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES Page 3 of 3 PROJECT LOCATION MAP NORTH frifr11 e 1 MOM i ------. 4----„...------ D PROJECT 16 - DRI -*47 SITE ,, BOUNDARY, 7.] s.'P r gliNa: 1111 .' 2t".'":"...L..... 30 24) 1 t' LJ 0 q‘1( 1 /7- 1 1 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HEX NO. 2016—20 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20150002870 —Petitioner, Toll Bros., Inc. requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, to reduce the front yard setback for secondary front yards on single family detached, zero lot line and two family/duplex corner lots, to increase the minimum distance between multi family principal structures, and to add four deviations relating to entrance signs, dead-end streets, and off-street parking, only for the residential development known as Azure at Hacienda Lakes. The subject property is located approximately one-half mile east of the intersection of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road CR 864) in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING:May 26, 2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: Other than representatives of the applicant, there were no members of the public in attendance for this item and no objections were received by staff. One of the requested deviations applies to the positioning of driveway parking for a low density multi-family product that will function the same as a single family product. This multi-family product will have a typical garage and driveway arrangement found on most single family dwellings. For single family and two family units, driveways are typically entered and exited from the adjoining street whereas multi-family dwellings are usually accessed by parking lots. Because this multi-family product uses garages and driveways, the applicant requested a deviation to the code to allow their multi-family units to back out of their driveways; the code restricts such movements to single and two family units. In support of their request the applicant created a site plan for single family units in comparison to the multi-family units. This site accommodates 92 multi-family units; if converted to single family it would accommodate 72 units. The traffic from 92 multi-family units would produce 559 average daily trips and the traffic from the 72 single family units would produce 776 average daily trips. I 5-CPS-01508/1259526/1]64 1 of 3 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20150002870, filed by Alexis Crespo of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., representing Toll Brothers, Inc., with respect to the residential development known as Azure at Hacienda Lakes, for the following insubstantial changes: to reduce the front yard setback for secondary front yards on single family detached, zero lot line and two family/duplex corner lots; to increase the minimum distance between multi-family principal structures; and to add four deviations relating to entrance signs, dead-end streets, and off-street parking. Said changes are fully described in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD amendment attached as Exhibit 1", and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1 —MPUD Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. CONDITIONS: 1.All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. 15-CPS-01508/1259526/1164 2 of 3 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. b 1 ^ 20(io G_ Date Mar Strain, Hearing Examiner Appro as to form nd legality: Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney 15-CPS-01508/1259526/1}64 3 of 3 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Exhibit "1" Page 1 of EXHIBIT "1" to HEX No. 2016 - 20 Hacienda Lakes MPUD Amendment to Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended by HEX Nos. 14-18 & 15-06 The below sections of the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, attached as Exhibits A through G to Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended,the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, are hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and specifically pertain only to the residential development known as Azure at Hacienda Lakes: amending Exhibit B, entitled "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,"Table I—Residential Development Standards adding Exhibit B-2, entitled"AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP" amending Exhibit E, entitled"LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC" adding Exhibit E-3, including Sheet 1 of 3, entitled"PRIMARY ENTRY SIGN PLAN AND ELEVATION;" Sheet 2 of 3, entitled"LOCATION MAP;" and Sheet 3 of 3, entitled"SIGN LOCATION MAP" 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) a lll s Exhibit "1" Page 2 of 7 TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS General application of setbacks:Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i.If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive,the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. iii. For corner lots,only one(1)front yard setback shall be required.The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10' setback.This setback applies only to single family detached,zero lot line,and two family/duplex dwelling types with a maximum zoned building height of 35' within the Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes property as depicted on Exhibit B- 1 and the Azure at Hacienda Lakes property,as depicted on Exhibit B-2,attached hereto.At time of platting,intersections subject to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05. Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features(i.e.:guard house, clock towers and colonnades)are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi-family structures may have terraced setbacks.Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units,garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. 6) Minimum distance between principal structures for multi-family dwellings shall be 20 feet for multi-family buildings where both buildings have a zoned height less than 35 feet,or 1/2 SBH for multi-family buildings exceeding 35 feet in zoned height, only for multi-family buildings within Azure at Hacienda Lakes, as depicted on Exhibit B-2,attached hereto. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck t Freugh are deleted; Last Revised:May 25,2016 Words underlined are added 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) err Exhibit "1" Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B-2 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP i -----„,_/-----`---..____ 1 i NORTH 1, PROJECT LOCATION RATTL ' • ' •, Fi HAMMOC gL',moi DR It A BOUNDARY j t.. U 11\ SABAL PAL • D L ilit) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Exhibit "1" Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation#10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6,which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs,to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3,Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. Deviation#11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b,which permits two(2)ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet,to allow for one(1)total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. Deviation#12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J,which prohibits dead-end streets,to allow one(1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development,as depicted on Exhibit E-3,Sign Location Map,Sheet 3 of 3,attached hereto. Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off-street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single-family and two-family residential dwellings and churches,to allow for back out parking from the proposed off-street parking for multi-family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development,as depicted on Exhibit B-2,attached hereto. Azure at Hacienda Lakes PDI Words struc-k-tnfet gh are deleted;Page 1 of 1 Last Revised:May 25,2016 Words underlined are added 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Exhibit "1"Page5of7erolh.l...a1r.. vo,yy rpm P AO I:133HS613[-913$sec U ucc-0431-e12 a P'fS-00£0310g00.1 3 itdcCIV¢v•ss ra.s wwna y- V 11313¢MIS-14111113O/V7H9 V1LWIH 001.14 7777.LO Ig'y'TO19N1}I33N19N3 U A13IWMV , 141!WalC,,.V , W11110,,,10,4aaxVaa lddOuUaVM / NOLLVATM V NVId NDIS[2LLN3 A1VND1d-£JO I.L33IiS`£-3 i.IffiHXH-S3NVI VUN3IJYH IV 3NfIZVSiN3WWO0AINn00(INV 1N3110 ted 03SN3i1 91,,W£ NVS1N31^1WOO ALNn00 ONV 1N3113 113d 03SIA321 9L La Qslnmi.«0311IWens»OOA32I SNOISIA311 NVld M zI,- w o I O W 53 1- W Q V1 I Q rn 11111 0C W W 1 CO 4I w ct0 4 1 U i cc. g J ti i ih z61 21V C z 11 r 1 ua p 8 II j d F tiIIa a o atl I Y 1 ii E s2 m 7 a vim 0 9 BmpAS-esei3S7-EO1.09I6`lsueb IueLnOU19WX3 uolleine0 u6is tilu3 Ipaves LSIsIl9!4x3-sBu)nneiplleieueD(BELIE{1W1—seNui Bpuepet4)00-9651:f 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) wrml .- Exhibit "1" Page 6of7 NORTH ESPLANADE AT, m HACIENDA LAKES Y PROJECT jiHr- LOCATION RATTL- HANIOC ii rob „M r DRICR-864 i' "' r BOUNDARY 0 03 t czN W PROPOSED BET FIELD ROW U S,ABAL PALM RJ JN O 2 /tit cls L L 1 41 1 19 a 01m t r 32 m EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 2 OF 3 w 1pp AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES EXHIBIT LOCATION MAP m WALD ROP C FI.ORIDACFITPICATEOFAI/it(ORVA770N/B6M PREPARED FOR: SECTION.TOWNSHIP:RANGE:ENGINEERING TOLL BROTHERS. 14,23,24 50S 26E CIVR ENGINEERING I PIAN"w0I IAN0.9U,PE ARCHRECTURE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMERICAS LUXURY HOME BUILDER se+oosan*AcuvwoEoxrvE•surF2aoa BONITabFILENAME: 5(801E0501.dwg 24138 Pta39411an 2394057899 4 SHEET: 3 OF 4 Bran,220644:001018101041401182-2001 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Exhibit "1"r--- eie---1 iploil `1 2 v7 of 7Ed11111111.1"Z.. 40C 11lidp ti-'411 i i il511HI1di '1 RI 10I161.11 `I" • - & giujCi .,0) Z ,_ -0 u'l Li W07i1cnN, 1 .,,, 1 ,.. - 11 •; .: .. 1; .--il ..: :." '1 °- I 1 144: i • .:, 0 4.1rl'1011•1111Ntwii um 4, i ., „ MN .IT4 1 1 w 4 ..,, A , -‘, , 1111* a iIpw & ,,,. (/ <i 5 • in HI 4 Te ' ,>. %- .A* 11011 NI at AT :.? , s . I. ar / \ Nwoi‘ ,. % , > 111 111 *so < / < ,, f / ' < < • 5 ,, < '., = in 1 11Plal '' . z/ i•0* ' -------------i la NB iir •• q i- <‘ *- 63:535-immmm \B 4. ,, c?Quom El LE Ell jEi1111MB5 ' I Z < > 1 , 7 \ 4,4, / 0 NB all ' \ \\ / > wcri, K „. 50 ,,,,, 0 1111\ '\ 11 y . 0, TO I1a• , ,..._ / iai\" 7'1' / 49:•,. .:=4„'F' 4 :,„•,,op, . ._____,...0 . z 4/ iiiiii;..„.-..,.,-* ..„, , w pc 6 a Lii LL OP' ' ,\ \ 1 Cn 0 A 2 ,I. Cl. EE en a re Z 1 W z CNI tt)o i..6. ... 2 M Z Li; E 0 ' n. en INV=54 9107113/./9 UP'LOZ03008 lf/Weld P.7,011100,3..{10.01 OM US-arra L9WitqPin-.6.1...011.....0 l.c.e pi-tmn.P.F.H)oo-et avr 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HEX NO. 2021-33 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION DATE OF HEARING. July 22, 2021 PETITION. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20200001294 - Request for an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 11-41, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), to modify Exhibit B — Development Standards, Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing, specific to "Hacienda Lakes Tracts G and I" and designated as Residential/Medical Use R/MU) on the Master Plan for proposed development of senior housing units affordable to households with less than 80% Annual Median Income, and to add site development standards specific to a portion of Hacienda Lakes Tract I for the 160-unit affordable senior housing development known as Allegro at Hacienda Lakes. GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION. The petitioner seeks to modify operational characteristics required for senior housing for an affordable senior housing project proposed in the Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract of the MPUD, and to add an access point to this Tract along Rattlesnake Hammock Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Approval with conditions. FTNDTNGS. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87 of the Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of the County Administrative Code. 2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all County and state requirements. 3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04. 4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person. 5. A Neighborhood Information Meeting was conducted on May 17, 2021, at 5:30 p.m. Page 1 of 6 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 6. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative presented the Petition, followed by County staff and then public comment. 7. The County's Land Development Code Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 lists the criteria for an insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance. The Hearing Examiner having the authority of the Planning Commission may approve a request for an insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance upon review and evaluation of the criteria in the Collier County Land Development Code.' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the PUD? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the proposed senior housing is an allowable use, and there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the proposed amendment is to modify the requirements related to affordable senior housing and to show an access point from the project's R/MU Tract to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. There is no increase to the size of areas used or designated for nonresidential uses and no relocation of non-residential uses. The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized. Page 2 of 6 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that there are no substantial increases or changes on traffic or other public facilities resulting from this change. Senior housing units are an allowable use within the MPUD and they are limited by the MPUD provision that "in no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. " The governing MPUD zoning approval also has a maximum number of trips that cannot be exceeded. The proposed affordable senior housing is evaluated at time of site development plan (SDP) review based on the number of units and type of units proposed. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the proposed senior housing use is an allowable use. The governing MPUD zoning approval also has a maximum number of trips that cannot be exceeded. The proposed affordable senior housing is evaluated at time of site development plan (SDP) review based on the number of units and type of units proposed. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the proposed changes are related to operational characteristics of affordable senior housing and a right-in/right-out connection to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The development review process through Collier County and South Florida Water Management District will require compliance with stormwater permitting requirements, and the proposed changes do not create an increase to the overall stormwater retention or stormwater discharge of the PUD. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the change is limited to operational characteristics of proposed affordable senior housing and site access. The proposed senior housing is a permitted use within the Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract, therefore the relationship to abutting land use remains unchanged because of the PDI request. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or Amendment to a PUD Ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other Page 3 of 6 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the proposed changes are consistent with the future land use element FLUE) of the county's growth management plan (GMP). Environmental and transportation planning staff reviewed this petition, and no changes were deemed inconsistent with the conservation and coastal management element (CCME) or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 3 80.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)(e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Section 10.02.13 of the LDC. The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the Hacienda Lakes MPUD is designated as a DR[, and the proposed changes do not require hearing by Collier County pursuant to the guidelines under Section 380.06, Florida Statutes and does not constitute a substantial deviation. The proposed change is following the process outlined in Land Development Code Section 10.02.13 governing Planned Unit Developments. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the proposed change is not deemed to be substantial. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2 Criteria: 1. Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? The record from the subject public hearing, including expert testimony and evidence, demonstrate that the proposed changes do not affect the original analysis and findings of the original PUD application in Petition PUDZ-2006 AR-10146. An excerpt from the staff report prepared for that petition is provided as Attachment D, PUD & Rezoning Findings of Fact for Petition PUDZ-2006-AR-10146. Page 4 of 6 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) ANAI,VCLC Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Development Code to approve Petition. DECISION. The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number PDI-PL20200001294, filed by Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering representing Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC and McDowell Housing Partners, with respect to the property as described in the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, for the following: An insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), to modify Exhibit B — Development Standards, Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing, specific to affordable senior housing units for households with 80% Area Median Income or less to eliminate operational characteristics related to on -site dining facilities, group transportation, and devices for emergency service provider notifications; and to provide a vehicular access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road for the Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract where the affordable senior housing is proposed. Said changes are fully described in the Master Plan Revisions attached as Exhibit "A" and the Amended Hacienda Lakes MPUD as Exhibit `B" and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A — Master Plan Revisions Exhibit B — Amended Hacienda Lakes MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION. See Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended CONDITIONS. 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on -site services to better reflect projected trip generation. Page 5 of 6 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) DISCLAIMER. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPF, AI N. This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Page 6 of 6 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT "A" 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) LEGEND NORTH H INGRESS/EGRESS 0 LAKE PROJECT AREA = 6.71± ACRES TRACT "C" = COMMERCIAL NOT TO SCALE TRACT "R/MU" = RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE TRACT "R" = RESIDENTIAL RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD Ir TRACT 0 R/M U" v TRACT ----_/ IICII VIALE WAY TRACT II R,1 COLLIER REGIONAL PALACIO MEDICAL CENTER TERRACE PALACI O NORTH TERRACE WESTI I I Z\ HACIENDA LAKES MPUD EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO T RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IAIENGINEERING PREPARED FOR: SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: COLLIER COUNTY CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREPREPARED LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC 23 50 26 FLORIDA 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE -SURE 305 7742 ALICO ROAD REVISION DATE: 11/11/2020 P: 239-405-7777 SPRINGS, 239-4057899 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912 SHEET: 1 OF 1 EMAIL: into@waldropengI—ring.wm 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) m v a3 ;ooyQrn C7J w ov ov 'o r d a a o r yr m x Z g w S. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Proposed Acest" Proposed \ Acmes RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RQ, 1 1 1 LoWnd CAT STOPISHELTER Proposed CAT Routs 4A ti 48 Extension Existing CAT Rouse 4A d 48 Q Exbung CAT Family 4A 10 Exis" CAT Facility 48 Exi"CAT Routs 7 Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Exabrig Shared Use Pah pProject Boundary Development Boundary EXISTING CAT ROUTE 7 i (TO MARCO ISLAND) DEVELOPER 1 PROPOSED CAT STOP/SHELTER, THE LORD'S WAY POTENTIAL CAT STOP/SHELTER/ PROPOSED 4Ai40CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER PROPOSED CAT STOP/SHELTE 1 PROP. RATTLESNAK HAMMOCK RD. EX1 Land Use AttrscWn Tract Business Park or School Commercial Preserve Tract Public Faryities Trad (EMS) Junior Deputy School Residential Trad Residential i Medical Use Public ROW Reservation pedeWlan Fadlities VWU as Extended Along AN Internal Ras" Even it Not Shown POTENTIAL CAT STOP/SHELTER EXISTING CAT ROUTE 4A aeiStles WWI as Alerq AB Wornal Roads It Not shown EX13TING CAT ROUTE 4A 34B\ evreTrun_ CAT CAT W FACILITY FACILITY 4A (TYP) 40 (TYP) I Hacienda Lakes 0 5W 1.000ea Master Mobility Plan STATE LANDS 1?A'1IA " is i a-P— Or DW.11 10 2020 cir T.PrM1r M9rygf1( f1 N n) n 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT "B" 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing a. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; b. There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; c. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; d. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; e. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. f. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; g. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. h. Lands described as Hacienda Lakes Tracts_ti and 12nd designated as RLMU-on the Master Plan are subject to...the_ 9lJQwit Quc1Luuclxhous$Q%..Arknual. Median lacome-Urt i] or place for noless than thirty (M years.fromtlte date of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In combination with the commitment to affordabililty. the following operational characteristics apply to this project: a. The facility shall be for residents 62 years of age or older: b. There shall be an onsite manger/ activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating; stimulating activities for the residents; c. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; d. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding gab bars. e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on -site services to better reflect projected trip generation. n addit'o ... to the Aoye operational characteristics the followin 1jite_ design_ characlen tiCS annoy ;p the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes_prok&A-.Uands described in PL202000 17 a. All prinetpal_stuctures on Tract I will be set back a minimum of 80 feet from the parcel boundary. b. The one l ) Unl2ster external to the building on Tract I will_bg located onAhea st ide principal strtrctur_ e and a minimum of 350 feet from the southern provert3± line. The dumpster will be concrete block _enclosure _with -Rates and shall be -Roncrally used for disposal_of bulk Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stmak dwough are deleted; Last Revised: Jwmar-y 29, 2 June 16. 2021 Words underlined are added 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) household items such.as fum_ iture. Household refuse, such as food products, will be housed in trash compactors internal to theprincipal stnicture, c. An enhanced 10-foot Type "A" buffer will _be provided on Tract I along the portion of the southern property line adjacent_ to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes meeting the following minimum specifications: 1. Total of 44 trees comprised of 11 canopy trees and 33 sabal palms. 2. CanoU trees shall be a minimum of 10 feet tall at the time of planting, 3. Sabal palm trees shall be a minimum of 15'-30' staggered height at time ofplgnting grour ed in clusters with a minimum of three {3) palms per cluster,10 feet on center. d. Temporary construction fencing with a minimum height of fv feet shall in lle along th;jgMjhViLand eastern_p 2peerty lines__ throughout ft duration of construction activities gnd shall include screen mesh fabric. e. A_ 6-foot-tall earthtone brown or beigeZ_PVC_fenceshall be installed along the southem portion of the easternproperty line as shom.onn Exhibit C-1. f. All light fixturealpoles will be limited to a maximum height of 25 feet and will be "Dark Skies" com lip •ant. Exterior wall lighting, on the building shall not be. located above the second _ story, g. On -site security measures shall include a recorded license plate reader at the entrance to the Allegrg at Hacienda Lakes. All recorded data is private and onf ritial_and_will be provided 1o. Law .e .forcement upon their request, h. The developer/operator agrees to provide a Resident Assurance Check -In Program materially The devellpWr wi]l_provideand-use an established system of checkisin with each resident on a pre -determined basis not less than once per day, at no cWUgj_hg rCfiWnL.RO dents_may opt out of this program with a written certificate that they choose not to participate. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stfuek &eug6 are deleted; Last Revised: 3aeaary 29, 2 June 16, 2021 Words underlined are added 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 PROPOSED PUD DOCUMENT – STRIKETHROUGH/UNDERLINE 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 of 78 EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE± TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 *: Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30%) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. I GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. II TRACT “R”, RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi-family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi-family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle (RV) units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; 3. Two-family and duplex dwellings; 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 2 of 78 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi-family dwellings; 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); 3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non-commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; 5. Private stables on single-family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 3 of 78 III Tract “RV”: Up to 290 RV units are allowed only if residential units are converted to RV in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used in whole or part, other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Recreational vehicle parks (Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to the criteria contained in Exhibit B, and only in the location depicted on Exhibit C. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. Except as provided herein, the RV District shall comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) including Sections 2.03.03.F and 5.5.10. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; IV III TRACT “R/MU”, RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to I,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi-family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi-family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhi bit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; 3. Two-family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi-family dwellings; 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 4 of 78 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services, (Groups 8011-8049, 8071-8072, 8082, and 8092-8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; 3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. IV TRACT “BP” BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract “BP” is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 5 of 78 A. Principal Uses: 1. Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311-2399); 2. Building construction (groups 1521-1542); 3. Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799); 6. Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833-2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive- thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221-8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511-2599); 14. Government offices/buildings (groups 9111-9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661 ); 15. Health services (groups 8011-8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812-3873); 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 6 of 78 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911-3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812-7819); 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll-up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right-of-way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non-direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed l00 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711-2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043-5049, 5063-5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192-5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: l. Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334-7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371-7384, 7389); 2. Child day care services (group 8351); 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 7 of 78 3. Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6021-6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories/research/rehabilitative groups; 5. Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services (groups 7215-7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311-6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712-6799); attorneys (group 8111 ); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off-street parking shall be as required for a single-family residence. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. VI TRACT “C”, COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical-related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 8 of 78 retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed withi n Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi-family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed-use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising- miscellaneous (group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911-7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611-5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211-5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages-automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 - 7533, 7536 -7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction - General contractors (groups 1521 - 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211-5261); 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 9 of 78 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153-6159); 24. Business services (groups 7311-7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371-7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382-7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive- away automobile, exhibits-building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812-4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction - special trade contractors (groups 1711 - 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011-6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 - 8249); 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 10 of 78 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411-5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331-5399); 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011-8049, 8051-8059, 8071-8072, 8082 and 8092-8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712-5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611-8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 - 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self-storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non-depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111-6163 ); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711- 8713); 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 11 of 78 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221-7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios (7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); 68. Political organizations (group 8651); 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661); 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531-6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731-8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922 - 7929); 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 12 of 78 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (4311 except major distribution center); 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools (groups 8243-8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five-foot, six-inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT “A” ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 13 of 78 A. Principal Uses: 1. "Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; 3. Exhibition hall/community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator-related facilities; 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 14 of 78 6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Fuel storage and related facilities. VIII TRACT “P” PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. VIIIX TRACT “PF” PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 15 of 78 IX TRACT “JD” JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non-motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms/bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). XI TRACT “S” SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 16 of 78 1. Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; 3. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 4. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; 5. Recreational facilities. XII SIGNS: A. Seven on-premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled “Boundary Marker” on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) D. Two entry signs along Collier Boulevard associated with the Hacienda Lakes - North Area shall be permitted to include multiple residential communities on a single sign to accommodate developments which share access to Collier Boulevard as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Signage Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2 (See Exhibit E, Deviations #14, 15, and 16). 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 17 of 78 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi-family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi-family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 18 of 78 C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 2.73 Recreational Vehicle units/spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi-family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single-family units, and 1,056 multi-family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The l, 760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi-family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single-family dwelling unit equates to 1 single-family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 19 of 78 residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: a. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; b. There shall be on-site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on-site, or catered; c. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; d. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; e. An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. f. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; g. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. h. Lands described as Hacienda Lakes Tracts G and I and designated as R/MU on the Master Plan are subject to the following: One Hundred Percent (100%) of the units will be restricted to households with 80% Annual Median Income (AMI) or less. This restriction shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30) years from the date issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In combinat ion with the commitment to affordability, the following operational characteristics apply to this project: a. The facility shall be for residents 62 years of age or older; b. There shall be an onsite manger/ activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; c. An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; d. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on-site services to better reflect projected trip generation. [HEX 2021-33] In addition to the above operational characteristics, the following site design characteristics apply to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes project (lands described in PL20200001717): a. All principal structures on Tract I will be set back a minimum of 8 0 feet from the parcel boundary. [HEX2021-33] b. The one (1) dumpster external to the building on Tract I will be located on the east side of the principal structure and a minimum of 350 feet from the southern property line. The dumpster will be concrete block enclosure with gates and used for disposal of bulk household items only, such as furniture. Household refuse, such as food products, will be housed in trash compactors internal to the principal structure. [HEX2021-33] c. An enhanced 10-foot Type “A” buffer will be provided on Tract I along the portion of the southern property line adjacent to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes meeting the following minimum specifications: 1. Total of 44 trees comprised of 11 canopy trees and 33 sabal palms. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 20 of 78 2. Canopy trees shall be a minimum of 10 feet tall at the time of planting. 3. Sabal palm trees shall be a minimum of 15’-30’ staggered height at time of planting grouped in clusters with a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, 10 feet on center. [HEX2021-33] d. Temporary construction fencing with a minimum height of five (5) feet shall be installed along the southern and eastern property lines throughout the duration of construction activities and shall include screen mesh fabric. [HEX2021-33] e. A 6-foot-tall earthtone (brown or beige) PVC fence shall be installed along the southern portion of the eastern property line as shown on Exhibit C-1. [HEX2021-33] f. All light fixtures/poles will be limited to a maximum height of 25 feet and will be “Dark Skies” compliant. Exterior wall lighting, on the buildings shall not be located above the second story. [HEX2021-33] g. On-site security measures shall include a recorded license plate reader at the entrance to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes. All recorded data is private and confidential and will be provided to law enforcement upon their request. [HEX2021-33] h. The developer/operator agrees to provide a Resident Assurance Check-In Program materially consistent Florida Housing Finance Corporation requirements as referenced below: The developer will provide and use an established system of checking in with each resident on a pre-determined basis not less than once per day, at no cost to the resident. Residents may opt out of this program with a written certificate that they choose not t o participate. [HEX2021-33] Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria • Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. • This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a combination of both. • The RV Park shall be limited to Class A motorcoaches only. • In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. • The density of the RV Park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the d evelopment parcel [not less than 20 acres]. • The Lord’s way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard (CR-951). • A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially zoned or developed parcel. Sign Development Standards • Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 21 of 78 • Any signage proposed for identifying the on-site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. • Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development, or Plat Approval • At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 22 of 78 TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ZERO LOT LINE TWO FAMILY/ DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS CLUB HOUSE/ REC- REATION BLDGS RECREAT- IONAL VEHICLE PARKS Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per lot 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 10,000 SF 800 SF per space/unit Minimum Lot Width 40’ 35’ 35’ per lot 18’ per lot or unit 150’ N/A 35’ Minimum Distance From MPUD Boundary ** 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. 15’ Front Yard Setback 20’, or 15’ with side load garages 20’, or 15’ with side load garages 20’, or 15’ with side load garages 20’ 20’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater. N/A 10’ Side Yard 6’ 5’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 6’ 0’ or 6’ ½ BH N/A 5’ Rear Yard 15’ 15’ 15’ 15’ 15’ or ½ BH, whichever is greater N/A 8’ From Preserve 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ Maximum Zoned Height 35’ 35’ 35’ 45’ 75’ 40’ 30’ Maximum Actual Height 42’ 42’ 42’ 50’ 85’ 50’ 35’ Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures 12’ 10’ 12’ 12’ ½ SBH 15’ or ½ SBH, whichever is greater 10’ Accessory Structures Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ 10’ SPS From Preserve 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ Minimum Distance Between Accessory Structures on same lot 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 10’ Minimum Distance Between Accessory and Principle Principal Structures on same lot 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35’ SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35’ SPS SPS Minimum Distance From MPUD Boundary ** 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater 15’ or ½ BH whichever is greater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N/A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights **Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 23 of 78 General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. iii. For corner lots, only one (1) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10’ setback. This setback applies only to single family detached, zero lot line, and two family/duplex dwelling types with a maximum zoned building height of 35’ within the Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes property, as depicted on Exhibit B-1, and the Azure at Hacienda Lakes property, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. At the time of platting, intersections subject to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05. [HEX 2015-06 & HEX 2016-20] Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi-family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. 6) Minimum distance between principal structures for multi -family dwellings shall be 20 feet for multi-family buildings where both buildings have a zoned height less than 35 feet, or ½ SBH for multi-family buildings exceeding 35 feet in zoned height, only for multi -family buildings within Azure at Hacienda Lakes, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] 7) In the event the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD in the area west of the FPL easement, a zero-foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required (See deviation #18). 8) Where the property owner in the San Marino PUD agrees to the elimination of a buffer east of the FPL Easement, a ten-foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required (See deviation #18). 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 24 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 25 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 26 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 27 of 78 TABLE II COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR ½ THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER*** 10 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES **** 25 FEET 10 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR½ THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET***** 25 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET***** 30 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA – COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - SENIOR HOUSING MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET** 80 SQUARE FEET** * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to kiosks *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. **** Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. ***** except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single-family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single-family land uses set forth in Table I. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 28 of 78 TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY)- BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY)-SCHOOL 50 FEET*** 50 FEET*** 10 FEET 25 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES N/A N/A PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES- BUSINESS PARK MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES-SCHOOL 15 FT. OR½ THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS * OR 18 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL 35 FEET 50 FEET 35 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT- BUSINESS PARK MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 50 FEET 60 FEET 35 FEET 60 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA- BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - SCHOOL 1000 SQUARE FEET OR 350 SQUARE FEET N/A 35 SQUARE FEET MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK SCHOOL 500 SQUARE FEET N/A 80 SQUARE FEET N/A * Whichever is greater *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B-4, a Commercial/Industrial typical roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix 8-3, a Local Street typical roadway section. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 29 of 78 TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR½ THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET** N/A * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 2015-06 s-1 NORTI◄ m_ 11 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROJECT SITE 7 tll 11 Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 II ORI BOUNDARY 20 21 0 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1" Page 3 of 7 NORTH m EXHIBIT 8-2 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP ,�t�t'{ :�;ti/:'. �\-- :ff� ;;if!_ PROJECT LOCATION !'((:��{�- ;.:. ;,·.:" ORI BOUNDARY ..... _ +-.�-.;.....---.--- ' " (s�,��:-:;''{�•{J�i:�:��r -' - ']J;;. :f :, >: /' ;)t, ·,,:t•.'---<){ : 'i �-.��;/:';�{�}" ':" ' :' \ .___, __ :;--, ------11 .. ··.i��/:l�!,:·:f��)�.::i!�1is�·: '';,· . 1-,.., __ ....., __ __,,....., -----,,. ,.;J;:�,\tttr:t;�\:1��\.:,i,�).:.:-, ·: '\�:: ii��7. :jj,., ,.:•A;:l, '74it:: �,f :f :,��f-' ,·.-�;-; . � .. ,.t,X: .· 1�\ ,·/" . ;, 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) � -0 0 0 ll'l w 0 0 � co N � ui C .,a: c �::, �., ::E C 0 § ....J ll'l w 0 0 i N � 'ii :c � chen C -�2 e?.,C ., (!) € 0 z ., -0 C ., PROJECT SITE EXHIBIT B-3 HACIENDA LAKES NORTH PROJECT LOCATION MAP 11 DRI/PUD BOUNDARY 7 13 18 _J 36 31 NORTH m 2 32 ·13 {r;P;;;RE::;PARE:-;;;:;:D�F;;;O:;;R;-:-:----------------,:F;L:::o:ru;::D:-:A-;C:E:R:T::IF::,c::-A::TE;::-:o:F:-A;-:u:THR;:::-;:o:::rz�A::n::o;:N::::#8:6:36���r.iilri\i'1i!;.,;;.l;;;l;;;.].;iii{�l"'];;;:.J;.1 i cr-oJJ Br other s SECTION:14 TOWNSHIP:50 RANGE:26 ENGINEERING � AME RICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1j 24201 WALDEN CENTER DRIVE, SIBTE 204 a5 FILE NAME: 1284100E15·e BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34134 28100 BONITA 6R4NDE ORM· SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405•7899 EMAIL! lnfe@waldropenglneerlng.com g,PHONE: (239) 596-6600 SHEET:J OF Jiii _____________________ ___. _____________________________ _. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) rd r . ii � � ,S • i i � i 6 xhibit C =��===,=�=-=---·-·· --------=: �:�======-- _--�=-----===ti : • ' :: -11. ::i :: !I , ,. :: �---"-,-""-______ lli ___ 1,1 _ __ 9'!!1!!1_2'°;..'�lM#'!l-..p.---1 -!�r-���-,. .. • -- � I! :i ::1" " 11 ii I :: pm:;�!!'!i�m!lp�..!!il�=.i.:f--t-��cl � .'i.t l•f' HL.L. LULAT f!l!f.f.'..Q'lii :?IL2T[' Ii Ii ,, Ii Ii 1i :Yi /'• ilH(t HAC/£1VDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. HAUJr•J"((I /Jfl ... -.'W: Ii Ii i �,. HACIEND A LAKES U1llA INC�!;· .• IJJi/.'flJZ'f!f'Q2 .\IS.J. OVERALL MPUDIDRI MPUDIDRI .&. � f f ..f. A 911rw,yqa Mw11W IHHkfV DH/¥ MASTER PLAN .,o..,.,._,,o,,,,...,..tDD_....,�,.,• !MIC-....... �JJ9Q1 :1111111 .. ,., ..... Q:Noll,11 .. 11 itlflVMOtfU ll'Mll 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RRA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDWILLOW RUN RPUD RURAL FRINGEURBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE (URF)P,PRESERVETRACTA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDR/MURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLCOLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)GOOD TURNCENTER MPUDMcMULLEN MPUDUNDEVELOPEDHAMMOCK PARKCOMMERCECENTER CPUDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK EXT.FIRST ASSEMBLYMINISTRIES PUDHACIENDA LAKES PKWYEXISTING SWAMPBUGGY BUILDINGEXISTINGSWAMPBUGGYTRACKMIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)BP35.38 AC.ROW120'RESERVATIONROW60' HACIENDALAKES PKWYEXTENSIONRESERVATIONPFCAP,PRESERVETRACTSCJDP,PRESERVETRACTLLLLPRESERVETRACTEXISTING 170'FPL EASEMENTHENDERSONCREEK CANALLP,PRESERVETRACT*SEE NOTE #4WILLOW RUN RPUDMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 2*COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT"C" *COMMERCIALLAND USEACREAGE**2.51± ACRES34.16± ACRESDESIGNATORATTRACTION47.27± ACRES"A"RESIDENTIAL447.86± ACRES"R"BUSINESS PARK35.38± ACRES"BP"PRESERVE1546.11± ACRES"P"PUBLIC FACILITY 1.33± ACRES"PF"JUNIOR DEPUTY21.62± ACRES"JD"SCHOOL19.55± ACRES"S"RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 38.82± ACRES"R/MU"PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS 70.04± ACRES"ROW"2262.14± ACRESTOTAL* THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTERACREAGE OF 36.67** EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE"ROW" TRACTABPCPPFJDSRR/MUROW- ATTRACTION TRACT- BUSINESS PARK- COMMERCIAL- PRESERVE TRACT- PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS)- JUNIOR DEPUTY- SCHOOLS- RESIDENTIAL TRACT- RESIDENTIAL / MEDICAL USE- PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTSPROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATIONRELOCATED OR EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATIONLEGENDLAND USE SUMMARY0SCALE IN FEET300 600 1200WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E0328100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com1B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/23/2022 11:58:42 AMHACIENDA LAKESMPUD/DRIMASTER PLANFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONS9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 505Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes *COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT"C" * COMMERCIALLAND USE ACREAGE**2.51± ACRES34.16± ACRESDESIGNATORATTRACTION47.27± ACRES"A"RESIDENTIAL447.86± ACRES"R"BUSINESS PARK35.38± ACRES"BP"PRESERVE1546.11± ACRES"P"PUBLIC FACILITY 1.33± ACRES"PF"JUNIOR DEPUTY21.62± ACRES"JD"SCHOOL19.55± ACRES"S"RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 38.82± ACRES"R/MU"PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS 70.04± ACRES"ROW"2262.14± ACRESTOTAL* THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTERACREAGE OF 36.67** EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE"ROW" TRACTABPCPPFJDSRR/MUROW- ATTRACTION TRACT- BUSINESS PARK- COMMERCIAL- PRESERVE TRACT- PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS)- JUNIOR DEPUTY- SCHOOLS- RESIDENTIAL TRACT- RESIDENTIAL / MEDICAL USE- PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTSPROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATIONRELOCATED OR EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATIONLEGENDLAND USE SUMMARYP,PRESERVETRACTP,PRESERVETRACTCOLLIER REGIONALMEDICAL CENTER PUDRA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDSABAL PALM ROADP,PRESERVETRACTP,PRESERVETRACTA, AGRICULTURESINGLE-FAMILYHOMES AND PRIVATENURSERY USESA, AGRICULTURESINGLE-FAMILYHOMES AND PRIVATENURSERY USESR/MURRRRRRLLLLLLLLLLLNOT PART OF THISPROJECT (LESS &EXCEPT PARCEL B)NOT A PART OF THISPARCEL (LESS &EXCEPT PARCEL A)A, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDRPUD ROCKEDGEWINDINGCYPRESS (DRI)RURAL FRINGEFRINGE (URF)MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)URBAN RESIDENTIALCOLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)ROW120'RESERVATIONROW60'RESERVATIONMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 10SCALE IN FEET300 600 1200WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E0328100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com2B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/23/2022 11:58:43 AMHACIENDA LAKESMPUD/DRIMASTER PLANFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONS9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 506Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes MPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES:1. WITHIN THE MPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE A MINMUM OF 60% USEABLEOPEN SPACE.2. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALLBE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE.3. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS,LAKES, AND/OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP ORCONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL.4. IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PL20210002687 ARE VACATED BY THEBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS AREALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION IS NOT APPROVED, THEN THESEACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED.5. SEE EXHIBIT C-2 FOR NORTH AREA DEVIATION LOCATIONS.HACIENDA LAKES NATIVE PRESERVE SUMMARYPROJECT AREA2262.14TOTALRURAL (AC)1637.07DESCRIPTION1721.971426.59ON-SITE NATIVE VEGETATION2.020.00LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK EXT.0.420.00LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN THE LORDS WAY EXT.11.005.93LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN THE BENFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR6.075.02LESS THE NATIVE VEG WITHIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVES1702.461415.64NATIVE VEGETATION FOR REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS-*PERCENTAGE FOR REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE<921.09<849.38REQUIRED NATIVE VEGETATION1546.1161.80COMPENSATING NATIVE PRESERVE (2x URF DEFICIT)**1493.051395.351354.54PRESERVED NATIVE VEGETATION**625.07TOTAL PRESERVE AREAURBAN (AC)2.02295.385.010.42286.871.0625%53.0671.7140.81* NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIREMENT (LDC SUBSECTION 2.05.02 B.2.G.II.) OF 90% WITHINTHE RFMUD SENDING LANDS EXCEEDS 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUDSENDING LANDS. THEREFORE, OVER 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD SENDINGLANDS SHALL BE THE REQUIRED RURAL NATIVE VEGETATION AREA.** COMPLIANCE WITH LDC SUBSECTION 3.05.07 H.1.A., REQUIRES NATIVE VEGETATIONPLANTING ENHANCEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 12.24 ACRES OF THE PROJECT'S URFSUBDISTRICT PRESERVE TRACT. COMPLIANCE WITH 100% OF THE NATIVEVEGETATION PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT SHALL BE ACHIEVED THROUGHPRESERVING RFMUD PROJECT NATIVE VEGETATION IN AN AMOUNT TWO TIMES THEDEFICIENT NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE ACREAGE IN THE URF SUBDISTRICTPROJECT LANDS AS IS PROVIDED FOR THROUGH THE ADOPTED GMP AMENDMENT.MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITYRESIDENTIAL DENSITY: THIS MPUD SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGUNITS (DU) THAT EQUATES TO A DENSITY OF 0.78 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE. THE1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE EITHER SINGLE OR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AS DEFINED IN THELDC. NO MORE THAN 1,232 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTIRE PUD.CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE 1,760 UNIT ALLOCATION. AMINIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE R/MU TRACT, AND AMINIMUM OF 17 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN TRACT C. THE BALANCE OFTHE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS GENERATED FROM TRACT C (13 UNITS) MUST BECONSTRUCTED IN EITHER THE R/MU TRACT, OR ON A PORTION OF TRACT R, WITHINONE-THIRD OF ONE MILE OF THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT CLAND USE CONVERSION FACTORSRESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 1.0 RESIDENTIAL UNIT EQUATES TO 4 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS (NOTTO EXCEED 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN THE ENTIRE PUD). UP TO 1,232 OF THE TOTAL1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY AS DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENTCODE.COMMERCIAL INTENSITY: HACIENDA LAKES IS INTENDED TO BE DEVELOPED WITH AMIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT INCLUDE 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSSFLOOR AREA OF RETAIL USES, 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICALOFFICE USES, 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF GENERAL OFFICE USES,140,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES, AND 135HOTEL ROOMS.IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS. SUCH MAXIMUMTRIP GENERATION CAP WAS DEVELOPED BASED ON 327,500 GROSS SQUARE FEET OFRETAIL LAND USES, 50,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE LAND USES, 20,000GROSS SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL OFFICE LAND USES, 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OFBUSINESS PARK LAND USES, A PRIMARY SCHOOL WITH A CONTEMPLATED ENROLLMENT OF919 STUDENTS, 135 HOTEL ROOMS, NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET, 704SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, AND 1,056 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS. HOWEVER, THE HOTEL SHALL NOTCOUNT AGAINST THE 140,000 SQUARE FOOT CAP ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS PARK.SHOULD THE BP TRACT NOT BE DEVELOPED AS A BUSINESS PARK BUT BE DEVELOPED AS ASCHOOL (EXCLUDING COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS), SUCHFACILITY SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET ALLOWED INTHAT TRACT.THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO CONVERT RETAIL LAND USES TO OFFICE LANDUSES AT A ONE TO ONE (1:1) RATIO, NOT TO EXCEED 25% OF THE RETAIL LAND USEALLOCATION PROVIDED ONLY IF THE CONVERTED USE IS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE TRACT.THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO WHOLLY CONVERT THE HOTEL DEVELOPMENTOPPORTUNITY OF 135 ROOMS NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 SQUARE FEET TO 60,000 SQUAREFEET OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES.ALL EXISTING LAND USES AND FACILITIES IN THE ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY TRACTSSHALL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE OVERALL TRIP AND LAND USE CAP.SENIOR HOUSING INTENSITY: THE INTENSITY OF ANY SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT SHALLHAVE A MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) OF 0.60. THE DWELLING UNIT CAP IS ONLYINTENDED TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITSAS THOSE UNITS ARE DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE DEVELOPMENT MAYINCLUDE IN EXCESS OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IF SOME ARE DEVELOPED AS SENIORHOUSING UNITS. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE CCOMMERCIAL TRACT, SENIOR HOUSING UNITS SHALL BE DEVELOPED THROUGH THECONVERSION OF RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE ALLOWED FORCONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING UNITS BASED ON THE LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORSABOVE. HOWEVER, 1 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT EQUATES TO 1 SINGLE-FAMILY STYLEINDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS. IN NO INSTANCE SHALL GREATER THAN 450 SENIOR HOUSINGUNITS BE DEVELOPED IN THE MPUD.TOTAL PROJECT INTENSITY: IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAKHOUR TRIPS.0SCALE IN FEET300 600 1200WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E0328100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com3B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/23/2022 11:58:44 AMHACIENDA LAKESMPUD/DRIMASTER PLANFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONS9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 507Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes LEGEND+-+ INGRESS/EGRESS � LAKE � PROJECT AREA= 6.71± ACRES TRACT "C" = COMMERCIAL TRACT "R/MU" = RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE TRACT "R" = RESIDENTIAL Approved by HEX Decision 2021-33 NORTH m NOTTO SCALE RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD TRACT "C" COLLIER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PREPARED FOR: HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912 TRACT TRACT "R" fvv .Vvv lvVv \A/v r Vv /� Vvv � /VVV'vi �/ 1/'vv"v/ /VV'/ \A/VI VY PALACIO ERRACE WESTI PALACIO TERRACE NORTH I EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO ••• ,,, T/4, I I] i{I] :.I RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD ,� ENGINEERINGSECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: COLLIER COUNTY CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 23 50 26 FLORIDA REVISION DATE: SHEET: 11/11/2020 I OF I 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE· SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waJdropengineering.com 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) required 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer enhanced 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer existing 6' wall existing 15' wide type 'B' landscape buffer existing 15' wide type 'B' landscape buffer ex. 6' wall Esplanade al Hacienda lakes ··�•"·1 SECTION SITE PLAN enhanced sabal palm buffer 115'-30' staggered ht.) code required canopy tree 110' ht.) Allegro at Hacienda lakes ex. 15' wide type 'B' landscape buffer required 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer existing 6' wall 11, )> "O "O 0 < CD a. O" '< I m >< 0 CD C') cii" 0 ::::J I\) 0 I\) ..J. I w w M����L 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 509Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) RA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDA, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDWILLOW RUN RPUD RURAL FRINGEURBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE (URF)A, AGRICULTUREUNDEVELOPEDRRRRRRRLLLLLLLCOLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)FIRST ASSEMBLYMINISTRIES PUDHACIENDA LAKES PKWYEXISTING SWAMPBUGGY BUILDINGEXISTINGSWAMPBUGGYTRACKMIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)BP35.38 AC.ROW120'RESERVATIONROW60' HACIENDALAKES PKWYEXTENSIONRESERVATIONPFAP,PRESERVETRACTLLEXISTING 170'FPL EASEMENTHENDERSONCREEK CANALLP,PRESERVETRACT1614151617*18181818WILLOW RUN RPUD190SCALE IN FEET150 300 600WALDROPCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER:SHEET :363-15-E034B:\Projects\1284-101 (Hacienda North) Isles of Naples PUDA\Drawings-Exhibits\1284-101-E02 Exhibit C - MCP (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg2/28/2022 10:19:51 AMENLARGEMENT OFHACIENDA LAKESNORTH AREA C-2FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSABPPPFR- ATTRACTION TRACT- BUSINESS PARK- PRESERVE TRACT- PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS)- RESIDENTIAL TRACTLEGEND* IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PL20210002687 ARE VACATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTYCOMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE ALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATIONIS NOT APPROVED, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED.- PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS- DEVIATION LOCATIONPROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATIONRELOCATED OR EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATIONROW#9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 510Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes EXHIBITD LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89°10'42"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°1 l'l4"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89°09'39"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°1 l'0l"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00°13'35"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00°14'15"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87°07'13"E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01°08'02"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°12'28"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01°04'1 l"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°28'21"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 °01 '58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01°18'52"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89°22'00"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01°14'38"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.0l 001'15"E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58"W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01°01'15"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00°51'54"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'3l"E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01°01'15"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'3 I "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 °48'00"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°3 l '38"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°48'1 l"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'42"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00°48'45"E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 40 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °27'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00°49'30"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION II ; THENCE N.00°50'27"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87°28'56"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °49'13"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °47'37"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °27'14"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°47'14"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'42"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87 °30'06"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°38'50"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00°41'44"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°40'34"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°36'23"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87°26'1 l"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°30'06"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°38'50"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °32'03"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°33'59"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°38'5l"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °37'27"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°42'40"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°40'54"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°56'29"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°34'58"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAlD FRACTION; THENCE N.00°4I'32"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°41'38"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °26'32"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 41 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°33'18"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°34'02"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88°12'42"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03°39'20"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88°56'10"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'20"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'13"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03°18'3l"E. FOR 14 51.00 FEET; THENCE N.88°56'54"E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00°31'35"E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89°15'59"E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89°57'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°37'14"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°34'43"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00°41'48"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°23'00"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35"E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00°52'45"E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89°46'12"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°49'34"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 °12'08"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. l O 1,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00°59'10"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89°22'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°55'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89°46'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES+/­ PARCEL "B" BEGINNfNG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °40'10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°17'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°56'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-l0146 BCC Approved I 0/25/1 I Page 42 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °23'02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 °00'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNEROF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES+/-Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page43 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2435 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT A EmibH"A" A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITIJATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 soum. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE 4 INCH SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENT REFERENCED IN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD NUMBER 84343 MARKING THE EAST ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTII, RANGE 26 EAST; TIIENCE ALONG THE EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS Q -��!'-"'P 'l'+\."� .. �S DESCRIPTION, s.89 °0t '5B"W., FOR 30.03 FEET ����ffi���,.,n., ... WES 1 TERL v RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD RO,"11.,..,. _"'-� __ _ ......... ,� .. ,ING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING SECTION LINE, S.89 °01 '58"W., FOR 1,298.4 mtt'1�i;ilB�::rnl� CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHEA NE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTE,n....,,...·= ALONG THE EAST, sourn AND WEST LINES O TER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER o .. �-uq,�_...,.�� ,-,vr.&J QUARTER THE FOLLOWING TIIREE (3) COURSES: 1.TIIENCE S.01 °18'52"W., FOR 679.65 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD wrra CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTiiWEST ONE QUARTER; 2.THENCE S.89°22'00"W., FOR 663.28 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD Wl1li CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOtrrnWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 3. THENCE N.01 °14'38"E., FOR 675.75 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD Wl11l CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER AND A POINT ON SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE; TIIENCE ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 664.25 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89 °01 '58"W., FOR 627. I 6 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD MARKING TIIE SOUTiiWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF TIIE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF N.01 °01 '15"E., FOR 1,699.99 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE S.88 °58'45"E., FOR 44S.48 FEET; Page 44 of 78 Exhibit D-1 Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Legal Description Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) OR 4938 PG 2436 • TIIENCE N.01 °01'15"E., FOR 400.00 FEET; TIIENCE S.88°58'45"E., FOR 151.77 FEET; • TIIENCE N.01 °01'15"E., FOR 457.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXTENSION AND A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1.TIIENCE EASTERLY 268.S8 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE TO TIIE LEFT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 949.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'55" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.82°44'27"E. FOR 267.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2.TIIENCE EASTERLY 297.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 °22'07" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.88°49'03"E. FOR 294.05 FEET TO A POINT OF COMP 3.TIIENCE EASTERLY 211.21 �illb\���-r,�Gn �s!\�T A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA VINO A RADi&...IU-.U'I' A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11 °38'09" AND BEING S 210.84 FEET TO A PO 4.THENCE EASTERL THE LEFT HA VINO A�•� 27 °00'44" AND BEING 541.84 FEET; 5. THENCE N.87°37'31 "E., 6. TIIENCE SOUTIIEASTE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA S.71°10'49"E. FOR CURVE TO ANGLE OF S.78°52'07"E. FOR ._. Y:L"-IA .�..,n.VATIJRE; ,.,.,. ......... 1,-tJ.J""'u;;.,..."A.�·c OF A TANGENTIAL FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 °57'22" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.46°53'48"E. FOR 71.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD ROAD AND A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; TIIENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1.TIIENCE SOUTIIEASTERL Y 955.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 1,160.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°11 '39" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD Wl-DCH BEARS S.25°00'56"E. FOR 928. 70 FEET; 2.THENCE S.48 °36'46"E., FOR 641.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 3.THENCE SOUTIIEASTERLY 909.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°04'53" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.23°34'19"E. FOR 880.38 FEET; 4.TIIENCE S.01 °28'07"W., FOR 239.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. Page45 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 46 of 78 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights‐of‐way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights‐of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow “boundary marker” signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for “boundary markers” to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6’) feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8’) feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord’s Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off‐site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E‐2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. [HEX 2014-18] Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 47 of 78 Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one (1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead‐end streets, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E‐3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off‐street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single‐family and two‐family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off‐street parking for multi‐family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit B‐2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at Hacienda Lakes – North Area as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs with a combined sign area of 128 square feet which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead‐end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes – North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E‐4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture-zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes - North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NORTI-1 m Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 11 PROJECT s,rE Exhibit B Page 3 of 4 7 18 ORI BOUNDARY e 20 211 D 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-2 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA !AKES ENTRY SIGN LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 1, �--· ----�...--_,....-��---�---�� ---��=.:;::::::___ c�===5:;.=���..=;=-��)C3 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD_....;, ;("'•--..-.;;;.:;,,, -- I )> ., r I I' ,, ,1 Li ;1 i, 1! '�-������,., ..... , • *a■�•�."'� RM .. 1 ••••• -..... Exhibit 8 Paae __ 4 of 4 ENTRY SIGN 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes J:161� (Hacienda Lakes-Toll Bros) General\Orawlngs-Exhlblts\51S-OO-E01 Entry Sign Devtalton Exhlbll\Current Plans\5180103-LSBese-Slgn.dwg �63 I w Cl) ; - 0 'Tj (.;J !" ,.� Ill J:-, "al�� � 8� II z I>! !ii. z � m Q a � &l !; g 8 i � 0 z .. (/) '"I:) �� ::.: :,ti �-< �� � tlJ .... � '"I:) � Pl> trl r � � � I ) (,.) 01 ·· ,-r I -< REVOO <<SUBMITTED» 12/11/15 2/11/18 I REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUN1Y COMMENTS 3/23118 I REVISED PER CLIENT ANO COUN1Y COMMENTS r� �h '1!-.i;i Jz ?i �1� :□ I� � (b ! �I I � =::c::I � p., I � I iO �1111 rn 1111 � . � ("D "'i j :::, I I� I I :□ � ., 11 1 O' i 1 12' � AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES-EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 1 OF 3-PRIMARYENTRYSIGNPLAN&ELEVATION Mlil\'Al 11] i{I] Q PREPARED FOR: ,waoo.cean,1CJ1n<1>•,u;nu><,zm,-..,,....., .,�ENGINEER ING TOLL BROTHERS LJO g 80Bd .. � .. l!q14x3 fill! IUIIIIID3.{.Sllas.,.Slgn.d"11 SHEET:! Of◄ I I D1IO mml'l GRWJ(DIIM •111111:808 ICNTAINIMll.f\.M11S Ptl39-C06-7777 ,,..,....1181 OWLJ.bda■wldso • I&.,... Oc-9 �OG uo,spaa X3H Aq paAOJddv 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 521Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved by HEX Decision 201 6-20 NORTH � ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES Exhibit "1" Pa e 6 of 7 PROJECT LOCATION D. m ] j .·;,:-. ORI BOUNDARY � EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 2 OF 3 .!r-------------------------7iii�iiiiiii;;;:::;;:.;;;�;;;;.1 j AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES EXHIBIT LOCATION MAP Nl\'1!11 ll i{ll ;iif-----------------..----------..--------·8 PREPARED FOR: SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: PLORIDACDTI11CATEOFAVTH00l2Al10IU..,. ENGINEERING f TOLL BROTHERS. 14,23 ,24 sos 26E (;ML....,,....., I """""• I LNOl8CN'EAACH!l"ECT\IIE AMERICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA � FD..ENAME: S1801E0S0l.dwg ------- 11100 80NIT4 8IMNm aw£· IUl'R. 300 --..-.n:u1311 Pl 238,,,485-7777 ti 2Do405,,7898 OMIIJ bd'o81rtdrnpe I J ,_,, ; SHEET: 3 OF 4 .:.;.._ _____________ ..._ _____ ..._ ______ ...... ________ 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) I I I j : I ;! j� ii PRIMARY ENTRY SIGN MONUMENT (80 S.F. -MIN. 25' SETBACK) PROPOSED BENFIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY •.: .. •J..,: . .-/. / Y\Sa\�:-;· ii\�-� □''8' C'.] 11 I I I I 8 8 :\8:. 8 8\\ 8811 -.I• :·.( �\l!!-__ .. . _.:_:_if. ·:-U:.-,- :i-'. _.__1 .:.. ·-""' L -.I. ,. '.-� ' .--,,� -:-•. �-• I ••• -··.W-�-�·· '_: .-.:.-f· .-, .• _ "�-· ... ;-.!..�-'.::--. �-:•--- *.I._ ... ---�.--- .,,· . -•L-;:t .,..!..;..:'.. . .),,,_•': --:"° _1,_ -:.:1 .• ,. -'-_'../-: _,.;_ :•.;..:,.._i-�---£.� .-'.'.-': <-_II _1,;__ __ ,-;_ ::·-.. .;�-�-� --'� -� �l_ PROPOSED DEAO:END - - I; L '.lo_ __ ,}!_ ,, .. .., -�:W{-:-_;J; � N l�IWM•ntrnQ ENGINEERING --·--------·-------._ ___ ,._ ____ AZUll.EAT HACIENDA LAXES SJG)ILQCATlOMMAP l!Xlllffl .. "C "C CD a. I 0 CD Q. en 6 :::J I\) 0 ....I. 0) I I\) 0 . --.i'E .... ;;:;f m X Ii I EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 3 OF 3 I :=:= �I :r-·O" � 0 : ...., � ....., ..9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 523Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) --d � � �r' [ I� -:2 : ,,tP ___ �----�:7lil1f: BOUNDARY 111 \ MARKER ::: : (32SF) ::: I I I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT � I . :1 ,ENTRY en � �"'a:: w 0 (.) PROPERTY BOUNDARY, TYPICAL I !�\': 1r 1 !LA�i\ I . ,,1-' ---+,r---'4 \\�/ I ' / 'j FUTURE ROAD CONECTION � N I PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT I CMl-mll�•� -�LJ­ D109UM111----­NMU.-ILUUS r:.-nnfl ....... nff ��- HACIENDA LAKES NORTH AREA PREPARED FOR: EXHIBIT E-4, HACIENDA LAKES -NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT, SHEET I OF 2---,,M-,,.-,mw-,.,,.-i-2022/01/14 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes ACCENT WALL OR PLANTER 10' '\. .. " . 22' ACCENT WALL OR PLANTER .. •' " 38' ·. .. ,,' 15' . . 20' .:., _________ I ___ -iL' :HACIENDA: I NORTH L _____________ _J I SECONDARY NAME L_ isECONDARY NAME - - - - - - - -1 L _____________ _J 12' ----ACCENT WALL (STAND -ALONE) h TOTAL SIGN AREA 64 SF (PRIMARY NAME - 40 SF) ((2) SECONDARY NAME -12 SF) 12' SIGN ACCENT WALL r-----------,HACIENDA 1- : NORTH � L ___________ J- 12' SIGN AREA32 SF I - i -,l -!! EXHIBIT E-4. HACIENDA LAKES -NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT. SHEET 2 OF 2 l�I aft.-llllNlllUMI -..-oor:a111sa.u-"' .. ___ H._•..,""­-•--R.SOllll ,., ......... nu f,P_,TH9 ---HACTENDA LAKES NORTH AREA PREPARED FOR: 7oll Brothers FILE NAME: 1284101 ENTRYSIGN -2022/01/14 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes EXHIBITF LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. I LEGAL A.Access to Parcel "A", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north-south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90-days of approval of this PUD. B.Access to Parcel "B", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress/egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C.No existing public access/roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off-site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A.Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description Project Area On-Site Native Veaetation Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext. Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor Less the Native Vea Within Archaeological Preserves Native Vegetation For Reauirement Calculations Percentage for required Native Preserve Required Native Vegetation* Preserved Native Vegetation ** Compensatina Native Preserve (2x URF Oeftcit)** Total Preserve Area Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-IO 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Total 2262.14 1721.97 2.02 0.42 12.91 6.07 1700.54 <921.09 1395.35 1544.14 Urban (ac) Rural (ac) 625.07 1637.07 295.38 1426.59 2.02 0.00 0.42 0.00 5.01 7.90 1.06 5.02 286.87 1413.67 25% 71.71 <849.38 40.81 1352.57 61.80 53.06 1491.08 Page 55 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) * Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. ** Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. 8.A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, forCounty review.C.The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Planaccepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement.D.An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior tothe next development order approval.E.Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior tothe first preliminary acceptance.III ENGINEERING A.A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951over the Henderson Creek Canal.IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A.The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP,Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remainundeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs andfurther study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites mayonly occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, andany disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist.8.Historical/archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if anarchaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed.V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A.In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services(EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facilitysite is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit C). The dedication of the oneacre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical ServicesImpact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation ofthe one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes ofthe Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no laterthan at the time the 500th residential unit is included in a development order request (sitedevelopment plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. IfOwner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in thisparagraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of theHacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/2S/l l Page 56 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA I.The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance"), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure I, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request.") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure I, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved I 0125111 Page 57 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) R1ure 1-Hacienda Lakes ORI - Commitment I l.m!li I.Existing lanes/Turn lanes \. Lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed • snalre {·iiijlliii-iiiii--.. ---=---:--:-:- ' ' \ Florida Power Line Easement ' , , / I -,�·'-:::,. -( PodA \ \!'..·. • ... \ �f ./A II.The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-IO 146 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/1 I Page 58 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Flsure 2 -Hadencla Lakes ORI • Commitment 11 II.Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes \, Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed �ay Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Prl!'liously Developed Area to be Developed Florida Power Line Easement III.The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page 59 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site-related improvement. Flpre 3 -Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment Ill J 8 NORTH AREA Liam Ill. Exlstin1 lanes/Tum lanes I.Lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed [J Area Previously Developed Florida Power line Easement IV.With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.95 I at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951 ). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-IO 146 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page60 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) fllure 4- Hacienda Lakes DRI • Commitment IV Yllml 111. EJdstinc lanes/Tum Lanes \. Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed -Roadway Segment to be Constructed LJ Area Previously Developed □Area to be Developed ■ V.The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete thereconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement andconstruct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the westentrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when theCollier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, thecost of the signaliz.ation of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Ownerand other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost toCollier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site-relatedimprovements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed todevelop the foJlowing additional land uses:Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 Page 61 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. F ure S -Hacienda Lakes DRI -Commitment V a.,...---�i� Florida Power Line Easement . I ,.,,....,_.'\ l Residential PodC Rattlesnake YUml I.Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes \. Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Sqment Previously Constructed Roadway Secment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed D Area to be Developed ■ I When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the ORI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to I 00 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 62 of 78Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI.The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for I 00% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards ( arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site-related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 I Page 63 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) F.e 6 - Hadenda ulles Dltl · Commitment VI lam .. E,asMg l.anes/Tum UM5 � ,� "'" L.tn.-i. to be CDMtructt!d/ll«onsuucted R�J'J �-nt i>rf'VIOUsly u,nstruct.c:l -!loadwa� �t to be Con<tructHI At•� PrfMouf,ly � C "'•� ,a � o.wlop..:I I VII.Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod Econnection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by roadeasement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, freeand clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County willprovide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement.The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to beconveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below.Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 Page 64 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 7 -Hacienda ulles DRI · Commitment VI TMlord'sWa YaM .. Ellllinll i..an.,,/Tum l.-- .. L-,/Tum LM>H to be Constrvc:ted/R.comtruct� RONW,I\J 5elMMt Pl'� CclMtru<tea - R.,.t ol Way 10 be "'-'wd Alea Pt� Oewlop!d □ArH to be o.wlapld VIII.Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site-related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10l46 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev. 09/15/11 Page 65 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Flpn I-Hacienda Lalcn DRI - Commitment VIII Florida Power Line / Easement �2 11111111 Risht of Way to be Dedicated IX.As a part of its State and Federal pennits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the pennitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stonnwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (2)agree to accept stonnwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stonnwater management system. These are site-related contributions. X.At two thresholds during construction of this ORI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the ORI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this ORI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site-related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-I0146 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page 66 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the ORI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. XI.Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a lO'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution. XII.Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a I 0'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution. XIII.ORI traffic studies identified an off-site impact at the interchange of 1-75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left-tum movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound (northbound) 1-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the ORI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build-out of the ORI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FOOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution.Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 I Page 67 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) XIV.If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that areeligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI,Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for thevalue of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for publicfacilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost ofstate and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlifeimpacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federalmitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmentalpermitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlifehabitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corpsof Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project inorder to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not includeCounty required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to theCounty to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmentalmitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-ownedState or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impactfee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV.Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-l0l46 BCC Approved I 0/25/1 I Page 68 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Proposed Access Proposed Access EXISTING CAT ROUTE4A &4B Legend EJ CATSTOP/SHELTER ---Proposed CAT Route 4A & 48 Extension --Existing CAT Route 4A & 4B � Existing CAT Facility 4A ■Existing CAT Facility 4B --E:icisting CAT Route 7 -Proposed Pedestrian Facilities I -.. •H•• Existing Shared Use Path D Project Boundary D Development Boundary � DEVELOPER I PROPOSED CAT I STOP/SHELTER : THE LORD'S WAY I POTENTIAL I CAT STOP/SHELT I I I I PROPOSED 4A&4BCAT ROUTE EXTENSION 500 1,000 Feet Land Use -Attraction Tract -Business Park or School -Commercial -Preserve Tract Public Facilitios Tract (EMS) -Junior Deputy -School Residential Tract -Residenlial J Medical Use Public ROW Reservation Prcparod By: rmJonos Prlnl� Dalo: Qaobo( 6, 2010 Flkl: l:\Protucl:-12005\05_O150.02.Ol_ HIIClendBlnkM;\GUP'!Rev02'1TrtinsllMP,mlld Page 69 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Proposed Access Proposed Access Proposed Access EXISTING CAT ROUTE4A &4B Hacienda Lakes Master Mobility Plan (REVISED (01/20/2022) Legend El CAT STOP/SHELTER ---Proposed CAT Route 4A & 4B Extension --Existing CAT Route 4A & 4B R Existing CAT Facility 4A ■Existing CAT Facility 4B --Existing CAT Route 7 --Proposed Pedestrian Facilities I -•·--Existing Shared Use Palh CJ Project Boundary CJ Development Boundary XISTING CAT ROUTE 7 SLAND) \ DEVELOPER I PROPOSED CAT I STOP/SHELTER I I HACIENDA LAKES PKW'( PROPOSED 4A&4BCAT ROUTE EXTENSION 500 1,000 Feel Land Use -Attraction Tract -Business Park or School -Commercial -Preserve Tract Public Facilitios Tract (EMS) -Junior Deputy -School Resldenlial Tract -Residential I Medical Use Public ROW Reservation Podestrlan Facllltles WIii Bo Extendod Along All Internal Roads Even If Not Shown Propo,cd By: rmtonos Prlnling On10: Oc\obor 6, 2010 FIio; TJProjucls\2005\05_O150.02.O3_ HndcndM..nkes\GMP'!Rc...02\TrnnsltMP.mltd Page 70 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A.Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water-Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water-Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B.The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C.The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D.This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield-SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A.Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TOR Credits and Early Entry TOR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B.A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SOP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SW AMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A.All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 11 :00 p.m. B.The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 sec Approved I 0/25/1 I Page 71 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) C.Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A.Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B.For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A.The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B.Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C.Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets (provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D.Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non-potable uses.X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A.One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and ORI monitoring until close-out of the PUD and ORI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the PUD and ORI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and ORI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the ManagingHacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 72 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP\I0-CPS-01024\119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 73 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT HACIENDA LAKES PUD MASTER USE AND CONVERSION LIST FOR SOP / PLAT/ BUILDING PERMITS APPROVED USES (including square footages) APPROVED RESIDENTIAL USES (SDP & PLAT & BUILDING PERMIT) TOTAL I RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY MANDATED OR DA TE PERMIT# DISTRICT UNITS RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL NON-MANDATED NOTE: IF BUILDING DUPLEX ON ONE LOT, ADD SECOND UNIT AT BUILDING PERMIT DATE PERMIT# APPROVED COMMERCIAL USES IN GROSS FLOOR AREA (SDPs) DISTRICT TOTAL RETAIL TOTAL OFFICE I of 5 TOTAL BP HOTEL G PROJECT TOTAL PROJECT TOTAL Page 58 of 79Page 58 of 79 Page 76 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes DATE PERMIT# APPRO�ED CONYERSJONS (SDPs & PLAT) FROM USE (& QUANTITY) TO USE (& QUANTITY) FROM DISTRICT ATTACHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP /PLAT/ BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP 2 of5 TO DlSTRlCT Page 75 of78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 76 of 78 HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP/PLAT/BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY] MANDATED UNITS BY GMP 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS NON-MANDATED UNITS: 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] REDUCED BY: 1. CARETAKER’S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT = 2.73 RV UNITS 3. 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON-MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI-FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) CONVERSIONS: TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT: __________ [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT ______ [UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL.] TOTAL: 1,760 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 RETAIL IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 OFFICE 140,000 BP 92,000 HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS BP DISTRICT: (A)140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES; AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * OR (B)PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL-RELATED USES [ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] [CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C-CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] [CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C -CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TRACT C: 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; 1.DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2.DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4 of5 Page 77 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 3.UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE[= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES I.DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO ___ OFFICE ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO __ SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [MAY HA VE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * 5 of5 Page 78 of 78 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SUMMARY 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Page 1 of 3 Memorandum To: Laura DeJohn, AICP, Collier County Zoning Division Ray Bellows, Collier County Zoning Division From: Jeremy Frantz, Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Date: November 18, 2021 Subject: Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Development (MPUD) Amendment (PL20210001791) Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Waldrop Engineering, P.A., Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., and Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc. conducted a neighborhood informational meeting (NIM) for the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) amendment. The meeting was held on Thursday, November 18, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. at the Fairway Bible Church - 3855 The Lords Way Naples, FL 34114. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A”. Approximately 7 attendees came to the meeting, including Collier County Staff. Additionally, fourteen (14) attendees participated via Zoom. A copy of the legal notice, affidavit of publication, a copy of the letter sent to surrounding property owners, and a list of the surrounding property owners are attached as Exhibit “D”. Jeremy Frantz started the meeting by introducing the project team Christian Adams with Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership by Toll Southeast LP Company, Inc., Rich Yovanovich with Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A and Josey Medina, Jackie Larocque and Nick Walters with Waldrop Engineering. He provided a PowerPoint presentation, attached as Exhibit “B,” on the Hacienda Lakes MPUD itself and the proposed MPUD Amendments specific to an approximately 144-acre residential project located in the northern area of the MPUD. He explained there are no changes proposed to the allowed uses and no increase to the allowed density or intensity as part of this Amendment. The proposed amendment includes the re-orientation of Business Park and the Residential Tracts in the northern area, updates to the development standards including a reduced side yard setback from 6 feet to 5 feet, deviations related to signage and dead-end streets and updating access locations and a potential unified development with Willow Run PUD. The updated Master Plan was presented and a handout including the current PUD ordinance was distributed as Exhibit “C”. Following the presentation questions were asked by attendees and responses were provided as outlined below. Public Comment Summary: 1. Is there going to be an improved road that runs north to south? RESPONSE: A couple of roads within the PUD. The Future Benfield Road is along the eastern part of the PUD that’s planned to be constructed. There is also a north/south corridor that’s on the west side of the Swamp Buggy attraction. 2. Where would that originate and where would that terminate is it going to be an artery is it going to be two lanes is it going to be four lanes? 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Page 2 of 3 RESPONSE: Benfield route will be extended to the access point [identified on the map]. In relationship to this project, it will terminate there for the time being and there is a future corridor that is planned to go even further south. The number of lanes and particulars of how that road will look like I don’t have tonight but we can get that answer for you. I know that 120 feet of right of way has been reserved. 3. Will Benfield Rd. go all the way south to US 41? RESPONSE: Yes. 4. What type of traffic counts are anticipated on that north/south road [Benfield Rd]? RESPONSE: We do not have the answer for that tonight. As a part of this project, we are not proposing an increase to density or intensity, so we are not doing a new transportation impact analysis, but we have that information from when the PUD was approved and there are some conditions related to roadways within the PUD. We can certainly get with you after the meeting to provide more information about those corridors. 5. What impacts do you anticipate on the Azure residents as a result of the development? RESPONSE: No impacts are anticipated. There will be no connections between Azure and this development, no shared amenities or shared HOA or CDD. They are totally separate. 6. The 144 acres what is that? You mention business and commercial. You mentioned residential business and commercial which is which? RESPONSE: The 144 acres is the yellow outlined area in the aerial. The residential will be to the north. The business commercial tract is the “L” shape sandwiched between the swamp buggy attraction area and the residential. 7. What are the types of uses on the business park tract? RESPONSE: We have some documents in the back that outline all the uses allowed in the business park. 8. What is the plan for residential, type of housing? RESPONSE: Single family or multifamily, as the PUD allows. 9. What about the commercial? RESPONSE: The commercial is not part of the Toll Brothers development plan. That is not what we are here to discuss. This request is really about the residential development and reorientation of the business park tract 10. What are the number of units anticipated in this area? Number of units and acreage when compared to Azure will it be more or less? RESPONSE: The amendment request will not change the previously allowed maximum number of dwelling units. We do not have the answer to the number of units when compared to Azure. Azure is approximately 130 acres so comparable in size to this project. 11. Are you accessing the property from Collier? 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Page 3 of 3 RESPONSE: I don’t believe there is a current curb cut but as you can see in the approved PUD there was already a planned connection. Correct. We are accessing the property from Collier. 12. How close is the property to the lake? RESPONSE: I do not know the precise distance from the property to the lake but it is adjacent to our property. 13. Is it going to be called the Isles? RESPONSE: No. It is not going to be called the Isles we have not landed on a name yet. As of right now it is Hacienda Lakes North area. There were no further comments and the meeting concluded at approximately 5:24 p.m. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) R A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED A, AGRICULTURE COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION WILLOW RUN QUARRY A, AGRICULTURE COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION WILLOW RUN QUARRY RURAL FRINGEURBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGEA, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED R R RR R R R LLL L LLL COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES PUD THE LORD'S WAY EXISTING SWAMP BUGGY BUILDING EXISTING SWAMP BUGGY TRACK MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)BP 35.38 AC. ROW 120' RESERVATION ROW 60' THE LORD'S WAY ROAD EXTENSION RESERVATION PF A TRACT P, PRESERVE TRACT L L EXISTING 170'FPL EASEMENTHENDERSONCREEK CANALL P, PRESERVE TRACT 0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 600WALDROPENGINEERINGCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET : 363-15-E0328100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com3 B:\Projects\363-15 (Willow Run - Hacienda Lakes)- Zoning\Drawings-Exhibits\363-15-E03 Exhibit C - Master Plan (Hacienda Lakes)\Current Plans\36315E0301.dwg9/13/2021 8:33:54 AMHACIENDA LAKESMPUD/'DRIMASTER PLANFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDCOLLIER BLVDLELY CULTURAL PKWYSABAL PALM RDCARMAN DRHACIENDA NORTHAerial 7/26/2021 Subject Area 0 0.1 0.2 0.30.05 Miles ¯ 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Sg1 ®11 12', T c, p N a ORDINANCE NO. 11- 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCEC` ZgZ5Zi72c` J/ NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) AGRICULTURAL- SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (A -ST) AND PUD ZONING DISTRICT SWAMP BUGGY DAYS PUD) TO THE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS THE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD THAT WILL ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS RETAIL COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA; 70,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE INCLUDING A CONVERSION OF RETAIL USE TO PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE; 135 HOTEL ROOMS INCLUDING A CONVERSION TO BUSINESS PARK; 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK OR EDUCATION FACILITY; A PUBLIC SCHOOL; CONTINUATION OF EXISTING "SWAMP BUGGY" ATTRACTION AND "JUNIOR DEPUTY" PASSIVE RECREATION; AND A MAXIMUM OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS INCLUDING CONVERSIONS TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK AND SENIOR HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING AND NURSING CARE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 2,262 +/- ACRES IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE- HAMMOCK ROAD AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 84 -26 FOR SWAMP BUGGY GROUNDS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., Robert Mulhere of Mulhere and Associates and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Page] of3 BCC Approved 10/25/11 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agricultural (A), Agricultural- Special Treatment Overlay (A -ST) and PUD zoning district (Swamp Buggy Days PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the 2,262 +/- acre project to be known as the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, to allow a maximum of 327,500 square feet of gross retail commercial floor area; 70,000 gross square feet of professional and medical office space; 135 hotel rooms; 140,000 gross square feet of business park or education facility; continuation of existing "swamp buggy" attraction and "Junior Deputy" passive recreation; and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units in accordance with the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 84 -26, the Swamp Buggy PUD, is hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super- majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 25`h day of October, 2011. ATTEST: D WICcI (CLERK t. By: PU DZ- 2006 -Ak -16 i 4-6'-- BCC Approved 10/25/11 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 2 of 3 FRED W. COYLE, Ch&rinan 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: i ', ,4- - - 0((2 Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A – Permitted Uses Exhibit B – Development Standards Exhibit C – Master Plan Exhibit D – Legal Description Exhibit E - List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F - List of Owner Commitments Exhibit G – Master Use and Conversion List CP\ ] 0- CPS - 01024\ 118 This ordinance s! ,,' with Secretary of ., ll3i?t day of and acknowledgeme pf that filinga received ti,isi day of py- - Deputy lerlc Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Page 3 of 3 BCC Approved 10/25/11 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE+ TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30 %) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. II TRACT "R ". RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi- family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle (RV) units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two - family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 1 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Multi- family dwellings; Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north /south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non - commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; Private stables on single - family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. III TRACT "RV ": Up to 290 RV units are allowed only if residential units are converted to RV in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 2 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) A. Principal Uses: Recreational vehicle parks (Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to the criteria contained in Exhibit B, and only in the location depicted on Exhibit C. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. Except as provided herein, the RV District shall comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) including Sections 2.03.031 and 5. 5.10. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; IV TRACT "R/MU ", RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi - family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two - family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Multi - family dwellings; Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 3 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services, (Groups 8011 -8049, 8071 -8072, 8082, and 8092 - 8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ( "BZA ") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. V TRACT `BP" BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract "BP" is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI below shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311- 2399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 4 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 2. Building construction (groups 1521- 1542); 3. Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812 -4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711- 1799); 6. Depository and non - depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833 - 2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk -up windows and drive - thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221- 8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511- 2599); 14. Government offices /buildings (groups 9111 -9222, 9224 -9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 -9532, 9611- 9661); 15. Health services (groups 8011- 8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131- 3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812- 3873); 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092,8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911- 3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812- 7819); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 5 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing ( group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll -up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right -of -way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non - direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711- 2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043 -5049, 5063 -5078, 5091, 5092, 5094 - 5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111 -5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192 - 5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334 -7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371 -7384, 7389); 2. Child day care services (group 8351); 3. Depository and non - depository institutions (groups 6021 -6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories /research /rehabilitative groups; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 6 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services (groups 7215 -7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311 - 6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712- 6799); attorneys (group 8111); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off - street parking shall be as required for a single - family residence. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. VI TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical- related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 7 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi - family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed -use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising — miscellaneous (group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911 -7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611- 5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211 -5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages - automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 — 7533, 7536 - 7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction — General contractors (groups 1521 — 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211- 5261); 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153- 6159); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 8 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 24. Business services (groups 7311 -7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371 -7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382 -7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive -away automobile, exhibits - building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats- decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812 -4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction — special trade contractors (groups 1711 — 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011- 6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 — 8249); 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411 - 5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331 - 5399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 9 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011 -8049, 8051 -8059, 8071 -8072, 8082 and 8092 - 8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712 - 5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311 -6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741 -8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611- 8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 — 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912 -5963, 5992 - 5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self - storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non - depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111- 6163); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711- 8713); 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 10 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221 -7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios (7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); 68. Political organizations ( group 8651); 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111 -9199, 9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 -9532, 9611- 9661); 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531- 6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731- 8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- 7929); 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (43 11 except major distribution center); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 1 1 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools ( groups 8243 - 8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five -foot, six -inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT "A" ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 12 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 3. Exhibition hall /community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator- related facilities; 6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Fuel storage and related facilities. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 13 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) VIII TRACT "P" PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. IX TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. X TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 14 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non- motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and /or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms /bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). XI TRACT "S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 15 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; Administrative offices and support service facilities; Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; Recreational facilities. XII SIGNS: A. Seven, on- premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled "Boundary Marker" on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 16 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and /or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi - family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi - family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 17 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 2. 73 Recreational Vehicle units /spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi - family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single- family units, and 1,056 multi - family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The 1,760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi- family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single - family dwelling unit equates to 1 single - family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 18 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; There shall be an onsite manager /activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a combination of both. The RV Park shall be limited to Class A motorcoaches only. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. The density of the RV park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the development parcel [not less than 20 acres]. The Lord's way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard (CR -951). A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially zoned or developed parcel. Sign Development Standards Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. Any signage proposed for identifying the on -site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development, or Plat Approval At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 19 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE ZERO LOT TWO TOWNHOUSE MULTI- CLUB RECREAT- FAMILY LINE FAMILY/ FAMILY HOUSE/ IONAL DETACHED DUPLEX DWELLINGS REC- VEHICLE REATION PARKS BLDGS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 800 SF per lot 10,000 SF space/unit Minimum Lot Width 40' 35' 35' per lot 18'per lot or 150' 35' unit N/A 15' or '/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' or % BH, 15' or '/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' Minimum Distance From whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20' 20' or '/2 BH, 10' with side with side with side whichever is Front Yard Setback load garages load garages load garages greater. N/A Side Yard 6' 0' or 10' 0' or 6 0' or 6' 1/1 BH 5' N/A Rear Yard 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' or '/2 BH, 8' whichever is greater N/A From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25 Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' 30' Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' 35' Floor Area Minimum SF 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance 15' or 1/2 10' Between 12' 10' 12' 12' Yz SBH SBH, Principal Structures whichever is greater ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10' SPS From Preserve 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Minimum Distance 10' Between Accessory Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Minimum Distance 0' OR 10' Between Accessory and Principle Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPSLSPSSPSSPS35' SPS Minimum Distance From 15' or'' /2 BH 15' or' /2 BH 15' or'' /2 BH 15' or'' /] BH 15' or %: BH 15' or'' /2 BH MPUD Boundary" whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is reater reater reater eater eater eater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back Of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N /A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 20 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi - family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15 -foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. PPo Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 21 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) PRESERVE ) 5' E STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY - STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 1 FROM PRESERVE I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK ACC SM. . FROM PRESERVE 1 1 i 1 8' MIN. 12' MIN 6' MIN. 6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE 1 I TYP.) I I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I 15' i FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 MIN. 20' MIN.- 23' MIN. I STRUCTURE SETBACK ROW L 5' SIDEWALK- - BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE i - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 2 Detached Single - Family Units i PRESERVE 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY 01-1-1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY - -- -- r--- ---- - - -- - STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 FROM PRESERVE I 1 I 1 1 I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I ACC. STR. STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I 1 1 I 1 I I 10' MIN. 10' MIN, 10' MIN. _O' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 1 1 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL I 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE 1 I I I 1 TYP-) 1 I 1 I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I I I I T AKSTRUCTURESETBACK1I120' 213' I IRPRI SETBAC 15, MIN. MI . IROW MIL 5' SIDEWALK BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE i - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 3 Detached Single- Family /Zero Lot Line Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 22 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) PRESERVE 1, 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY i/`/ i!16C URE SMACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY ---- -- --- - -I -- ---- --- STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 1 1 FROM PRESERVE I I i I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I I I STRUCTURE SETBACK STRUCTURE SETBACK I ACC. STR I ACC. STR FROM PRESERVE I I 1 I I I i I I 1 NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS MIN. 12' MIN. i 1 1 PRINCIPAL I STRUCTURE 6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 23' MIN. I I (TYP) STRUCTURE SETBACK FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I I STRUCTURE SETBACK i I 15' MIN. ROW 5' SIDEWALK — BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERUNE — --" — ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE I I1.77 N I I NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 4 Duplex and Two - Family Units MOW STIRUCTURE SETBACK 5' Sinn BACK OF CURB— CENTERLINE— I ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 PRESERVE 1 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY i STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I I I I I I I I SIDE FOR 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I I ATTACHEDYPRIINC PALI UNITS STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 12' 1 1 MIN. PRI IPA ST; RE PRINCIPAL J. STRUCTURErEE i MOW STIRUCTURE SETBACK 5' Sinn BACK OF CURB— CENTERLINE— I ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) PRESERVE TRACT UNE- 10 FOOT MINIMUM .../ J.J J _ _ — \_ _ ACCESSORY ( SE FROM PRESERVE — — — _ _ — _ _ -- — — 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT MDU M—} SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 7RACT LINEN 5' Sic BACK OF ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 6 Multi- Family Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 SETBACK 15' MIN. REAR YAM PRINCIPAL T7 STRUCTURESETBACK OF THE BUI DM Page 24 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE II COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR %: THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER * ** 10 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES * * ** 25 FEET 10 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET * * * ** 25 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET * * * ** 30 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SENIOR HOUSING MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET ** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET ** 80 SQUARE FEET ** Whichever is greater Not applicable to kiosks General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single - family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single- family land uses set forth in Table I. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 25 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET * ** 10 FEET BOUNDARY) — BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) — SCHOOL 50 FEET * ** 25 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD N/A N/A BOUNDARIES PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES - BUSINESS PARK BUILDING HEIGHTS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN or 18 FEET 10 FEET STRUCTURES- SCHOOL MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK 35 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT — BUSINESS PARK 50 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 60 FEET 60 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — BUSINESS PARK 1000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SCHOOL or 350 SQUARE FEET 35 SQUARE FEET MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK 500 SQUARE FEET 80 SQUARE FEET SCHOOL N/A N/A Whichever is greater General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B -4, a Commercial/Industrial typical roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix B -3, a Local Street typical roadway section. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 26 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER 50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR %Z THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET ** N/A Whichever is greater Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 27 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) og' r s9mmoDgZFZ. IT =m500Zf9iemso Exhibit C7F L 55 9 j s o fr lit i3 M N uM M N M n ev ° °sue ply lip S A,X a 54 sass o a I €€ InR(H 2flln Cf 4. 5r X1.11E HAciE rew[tT. CIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES mc c OVERALL MPUD/DRI CONSUL IN QvdHo eaa r, MPUD/DRI i I& ..a sus" oM.v MASTER PLAN .,o ....°,....:m.,..>,. 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 587Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89 °10'42 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 01 I'14 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89 009'39 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °I 1'01 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 °13'35 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 014'15 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87 °07'13 "E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01 °08'02 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 012'28 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01 °04'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'21 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 0 18'52 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89 022'00 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 ° 14'38 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01 °01'15 "W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00 °51'54 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 °48'00 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °31'38 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °48'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'42 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00 °48'45 "E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 29 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE 5. 87 °27'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00 °49'30 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00 050'27 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87 °28'56 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235. 95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.00 °49'13 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °47'37 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °27'14 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 047'14 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'42 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87 °30'06 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °38'50 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00 °4 1'44 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °40'34 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °36'23 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87 °26'11 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °35' 02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345. 93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 030'06 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 038'50 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °32'03 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °35'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °33'59 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 038'51 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.87 °37'27 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °42'40 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °40'54 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE 5.00 °56'29 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °34'58 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °4 1'32 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °41'38 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 026'32 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 30 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE 5.87 033'18 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °34'02 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88 °12'42 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03 °39'20 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88 °56'10 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE 5.87 007'20 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °07'13 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03 °18'31 "E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88 056'54 "E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE 5.00 °31'35 "E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89 °15'59 "E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 037'14 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 034'43 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00 041'48 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 023'00 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35 "E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00 °52'45 "E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 046'12 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 049'34 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 ° 12'08 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00 °59' 10 "W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 022'35 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °55' 57 "E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89 °46'12 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °40'10 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 017'48 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 056'29 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 31 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °23'02 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 000'20 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 32 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.0l.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights -of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall /berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C.5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and /or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 33 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. LEGAL A. Access to Parcel "A ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90 -days of approval of this PUD. B. Access to Parcel "B ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress /egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C. No existing public access /roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description Total Urban ac Rural ac Project Area 2262.14 625.07 1637.07 On -Site Native Vegetation 1721.97 295.38 1426.59 Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. 2.02 2.02 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext. 0.42 0.42 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor 12.91 5.01 7.90 Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves 6.07 1.06 5.02 Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1700.54 286.87 1413.67 Percentage for required Native Preserve 25% Required Native Vegetation* 921.09 71. 71 849.38 Preserved Native Vegetation ** 1395.35 40.81 1352.57 Compensating Native Preserve 2x URF Deficit)" 61.80 Total Preserve Area 1544.14 53.06 1491.08 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 34 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for County review. C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement. D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to the next development order approval. E. Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to the first preliminary acceptance. III ENGINEERING A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 over the Henderson Creek Canal. IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. B. Historical /archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an archaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed. V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A. In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility site is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit Q. The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no later than at the time the 500`h residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 35 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA I. The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance "), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request. ") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 36 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Figure 1— Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment I II. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 37 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Fiture 2 — Hacienda Lakes DRi - Commkment 11 III. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 38 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50 %) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site - related improvement. Flaure 3 — Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment 111 NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 39 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Figure 4 — Hacienda lakes SRI - Commitment IV rl__„, Residential Pod C I 6 S 1%_1 Florida Power Line Easement Rattlesnake 7 Residential Residential Pod B 17, 14PodA \ I L Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes — — L Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed /Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed j_ Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site - related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 40 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. Residential Pod C Florida Power Une Easement Residential" x; Pod r ttt ry Residential r. Pod A 1mid to Existing Lanes/Turn lanes Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed /Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed Residential Pod B k \ c When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 41 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent 50 %) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site - related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 42 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Florida Power line Easement Resksendal`' Pod C v Resdential Pod ; Residential Pod E The lad' Rattlesnaft Hammock 1 i g ResldeMisl ` _ Pod B Pod A `k IV 'Xna g Lanes/Tum Lanes L ianrt/Twn Lanes to be Canuructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Prevlou* Dew4oped Area to be Developed VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 43 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Hacienda Lakes ON - Florida Power Line Easement to Residenttai ` ' I Residents Pod D Residential Pod E VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site - related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 Ratdemm Mammal; Rpa4wension Netider ttal Pod B Pod A Lti>i ti y E sLsueg Larvra/Tum Lanes L Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructed/Reconst..ted Roadway Segment Previously Corntrutud r_ Riet of Way to be Preserved Atea PteviocMy Developed Area to be Developed VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site - related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) IX. As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or 2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site - related contributions. X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site - related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 45 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right -of -way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop /shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site - related contribution. XII. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop /shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site - related contribution. XIII. DRI traffic studies identified an off -site impact at the interchange of I -75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound ( northbound) I -75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build -out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 46 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 47 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Proposed Acest" Proposed \ Acmes RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RQ, 1 1 1 Ch / U / W / J / O / M / d' W J J O LoWnd CAT STOPISHELTER Proposed CAT Routs 4A 8 48 Extension Existing CAT Rouse 4A 8 48 Q Exbung CAT Fadkty 4A 10 Exis" CAT Facility 48 Exi"CAT Routs 7 Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Exabrig Shared Use Pah pProject Boundary Development Boundary EXISTING CAT ROUTE 7 i (TO MARCO ISLAND) DEVELOPER 1 PROPOSED CAT STOP /SHELTER, THE LORD'S WAY POTENTIAL CAT STOP /SHELTER/ PROPOSED 4A 3 48 CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER PROPOSED CAT STOP/SHELTE 1 PROP. RATTLESNAK HAMMOCK RD. EX1 Land Use Attraction Tract Business Park or School Commercial Preserve Tract Public Fadities Trad (EMS) Junior Deputy School Residential Trad Residential i Medical Use Public ROW Reservation pedaWlan Fadlities VWU as Extended Along AN Internal Ras" Even it Not Shown POTENTIAL CAT STOP/SHELTER EXISTING CAT ROUTE 4A aeiStles WWI as Alerq AB Wornal Roads K Not shown EX13TING CAT ROUTE 4A 348\ evneTrun_ CAT CAT W FACILITY FACILITY 4A (TYP) 48 (TYP) I Hacienda Lakes d Fea Master Mobility Plan STATE LANDS 1?A '1IA " is i a- P—Or_, r+...o oe.: ear e. mro c,,. na 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water -Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water -Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield- SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 11:00 P.M. B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 49 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets ( provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non - potable uses. X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close -out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD /DRI commitments until close -out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 50 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP \10- CPS - 01024 \119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 51 of 51 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) i w 0 UtiQOHti amaFQtxW Qz Z a WWd Wrn AWr>~ app Azd xwa W o oC) w H C) a U v w a Q D z w W a rs awl a w 0 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) O 4 a O w cn a w o w H x w a C7 Q a H H d w xx UU dd W w O z xx co 33 Q zW wo 5 C4 U v H z w x U d d 0 N 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP / PLAT / BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [ UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI - FAMILY] MANDATED UNITS BY GMP: NON - MANDATED UNITS: REDUCED BY: 1. 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI - FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT = 2.73 RV UNITS 3. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON - MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI - FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT ARE DEVELOPED] TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT RESIDENTIAL] TOTAL: 1,760 CONVERSIONS: UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM 3 of 5 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 140,000 92,000 BP DISTRICT: A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES RETAIL OFFICE BP HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) OR B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL - RELATED USES ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] TRACT C: 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; 1. DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4of5 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES 1. DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [MAY HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 5of5 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2011 -41 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 25th day of October, 2011, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 28th day of October, 2011. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex- officio to Board, of....._r ti• County Commissio7si ••,RS•, 3 ' r, r z By: Martha VercYa, Deputy Cle' k;8 ",L -` V • V lte' 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES – NORTH AREANEIGHBORHOOD MEETING  –NOVEMBER 18, 2021 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 617Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 2WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Christian Adams  –Toll Brothers, LLCRich Yovanovich, Esq. –Coleman, Yovanovich & KoesterJeremy Frantz & Josey Medina ‐Waldrop Engineering (Planning)Jackie Larocque & Nick Walters – Waldrop Engineering (Engineering)Sabrina McCabe – Waldrop Engineering (Landscape Architecture)9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 618Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 3TOLL BROTHERSExperienced developers of high‐quality communities in Southwest Florida Developer of Azure at Hacienda Lakes9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 619Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 4PROPERTY OVERVIEWHacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI – 2,262 acres Currently approved for:1,760 Residential Dwelling UnitsConversions for RV Park and Senior Housing/Assisted Living327,500 sq ft Retail Commercial70,000 sq ft Professional/Medical Office135 Hotel Rooms140,000 sq ft Business Park or Education FacilityPublic School, Swamp Buggy Attraction, Junior Deputy144‐acre residential project in Hacienda Lakes MPUD’s “North Area” to be similar to AZURE.Access to Collier Blvd and future Benfield Road.9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 620Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 5No changes to allowed uses or increase in density requestedReorient BP/R tracts in North AreaUpdating Development StandardsDeviations related toSignsDead‐end StreetUpdating Access in North AreaAllow for potential unified development plan with Willow Run PUDRemove RV usesPUD AMENDMENT OVERVIEW9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 621Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 6CHANGES TO MASTER PLANCURRENTPROPOSED9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 622Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 7Reduced side yard setbacks from 6 to 5 feetAllows corner lots to include only one front yard setbackPreviously approved for Azure and EsplanadeAllows no setback or buffer along northern property lineIf developed as unified development or by agreement with willow run onlyUPDATED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 623Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 8NEXT STEPS1.Neighborhood Meeting (tonight) 2.Resubmit Application3.Complete Staff Reviews4.Public Hearings:I.One (1) Planning Commission HearingII.One (1) Board of County Commissioners Hearing9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 624Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 9STAY INVOLVED & INFORMEDJeremy.Frantz@waldropengineering.com(239) 319‐00269.A.2.cPacket Pg. 625Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes BACKUP9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 626Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 11PROPOSED MASTER PLAN9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 627Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes SLIDE 12ACCESS CHANGES9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 628Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) November 1, 2021 RE: Isles of Naples at Hacienda Lakes PUDA PL20210001791 (PUD Amendment) Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership has filed an application (PL20210001791) with Collier County. The application is seeking approval of an Amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to modify residential development standards and development tract boundaries in the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD). The Isles of Naples is a residential project located on approximately 144 +/- acres, generally east of Collier Blvd and 1/3rd mile north of The Lord’s Way in unincorporated Collier County. Please note, that no changes to allowed uses, densities, or intensities are proposed as a part of this project. A Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Meeting will be held on Thursday, November 18, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. at Fairway Bible Church, 3855 The Lords Way, Naples, FL 34114. Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on “Join A Meeting” in the top right corner, and enter Meeting ID: 872 6082 5493. Should you have any questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 319-0026, or jeremy.frantz@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, LLC Jeremy Frantz, AICP Principal Planner/Senior Project Manager 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 1NAME1NAME2NAME3NAME4NAME5NAME6FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE10520 SOUTH LAGO VISTACIRCLE LLC2886 NE 26TH PLACEFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33306---022726001060 U1873 N BAHAMA AVE LLC420 LOGAN BLVD SNAPLES, FL 34119---000435800008 U3713 MILANO LAKES FL OWNER LLC % REVANTAGE PROPERTY TAX PO BOX A3878CHICAGO, IL 60690---000418400700 U3805 TLW LLC7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---000416560008 U4610 WINGED FOOT WAY LLC11 HOLLY DRSMITHTOWN, NY 11787---053269005149 U8360 SIERRA MEADOWS MOB LLC 499 N EL CAMINO REAL, STE 202ENCINITAS, CA 92024---030806000083 U8615 COLLIER-RATTLESNAKE LLC900 SW PINE ISLAND RD STE 202CAPE CORAL, FL 33991---062030900228 UABDO, WILLIAM J & PATRICIA A7828 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268579904128103 UABREO FAMILY TRUST8980 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001141 UADKINS, MARK E & CHRISTINE8005 CALLE CANOVAS CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863908 UADVANCED SABAL PALM CORP3331 WHITE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34117---411700433960005 UAHRENS LIVING TRUST8571 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851402 UAIESE, KATHLEEN1502 WISHING WELL LANEMANASQUAN, NJ 08736---022726002328 UALDO A AMBROSINI JR REV TRUST 19630 GOVERNORS HWY STE 2FLOSSMOOR, IL 60422---031347860985 UALLEN, ARTHURANAHITA SHARIF RIAZI8209 LUCELLO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860901 UALNOR, RICHARD & HEATHER8349 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865508 UALONSO, ANAMYRNA IVETTE RAMOS8837 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003220 UALVAREZ, RAMON ALBERTO8795 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000702 UANDERSON, SANDRA LEE4600 WINGED FOOT WAY #103NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005220 UANDERSON-BERGER, TERRITHOMAS EDWARD BERGER25792 CHEYENNE DRNOVI, MI 48374---031347864266 UANGELI, KATHERINE9012 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726009444 UANISZ, ANTONIO8889 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003482 UARAGNO, THOMAS JOSEPHELIZABETH T ARAGNO8576 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851583 UARCARA, SANDRA ANNWILLIAM FRANK ARCARA8853 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003301 UARMENDARIZ, VICTOR H & IRENE8296 LUCELLO TER NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853947 UARMINIO, ANGELO & GEORGINA8363 PALACIO TERRACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853329 UARMSTRONG, MARSHA C8950 MUSTIQUE LNNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001280 UARREAZA, RAUL E ISTURIZTERESA BLANCO ISTURIZ314 WHEAT SHEAF WAYCOLLEGEVILLE, PA 19426---031347855181 UASCIUTTO, BASILJUDITH W KELLY ASCIUTTO8910 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726002085 UASWAD, JONATHAN W & NANCY J 8501 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855262 UAUER, KARL & BEVERLEASTEIDLE, MICHAEL=& APRIL8507 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851949 UAUER, PETER & ROSA7726 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268179904126105 UAUGUSTINE, THOMAS R & GINA M 5264 FAIRLINE DRIVEPOWELL, OH 43605---026141000480 UAUSLANDER, MARK L & ERICA V8932 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001345 UAYACHE, REDAMIREILLE LEMIEUX1802 SHCINDLER DR NMOMMOUTH JUNCTIO, NJ 08852---031347853426 UAZURE AT HACIENDA LAKESHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC24201 WALDEN CENTER DRIVE SUITE 204BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---022726000029 UBABCOCK, MARK R & CHRISTINE D1406 SKYLINE DRERIE, CO 80516---031347854205 UBABEKOVA, OSNAT8020 CAILE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864062 UBAEZ, EMILIO3520 5TH AVENUE NWNAPLES, FL 34120---000437120003 UBAEZ, EMILIO3988 COCONUT CIRCLE NNAPLES, FL 34104---000467320705 UBAILEY, NATALIE KARENE3786 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374001283 UBALDUZZI, CYNTHIA8455 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852207 UBAMPOE, ISAAC G & DINAH A8969 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001743 UBARBAGALLO REVOCABLE TRUST 8936 ST LUCIA DR #102NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000121 UBARRY WALSH, DERMOTETHNA BARRY WALSH4610 WINGED FOOR WAY #7-204NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005165 UBARRY, KENNETH W & LISA A8358 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347854360 UBATZEL, KEVIN CPATRICIA L BREWER264 CHERYL LANEBRICK, NJ 08722---031347853727 UBEANLAND, MARY ANN8309 LUCELLO TERR NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853581 UBECKETT JR, ROBERT F & DEONNA 294 BRANDY LNNAPLES, FL 34114---257000438080003 UBEDELL, CHRISTOPHER JPATRICIA A BEDELL310 BOULDER RIDGE ROADSOUTH SALEM, NY 10590---022726001468 UBEDNAR FAMILY TRUST327 FRAZER DRIVE N WNORTH CANTON, OH 44720---053269005369 UBEINHAUER FAMILY R/L TRUST22 BEECHNUT DRSOUTH BARRINGTON, IL 60010---951253269005107 UBENTKJAER, MICHAELQIUPING YU8419 PALACIO TERR SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853044 UBEREZO, JOSEPH R & DIANA F8305 LUCELLO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853604 UBERTUCIO, KIM8082 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864127 UBEVINGTON, GRAHAMCHRISTINE MICHELLE BEVINGTON8770 ST LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002603 UBHATIA, VANDANA BINDUMADHUKAR DUKE BHATIA8914 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002069 UBIERY, JAMES R & DAWN A8469 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855424 UBILTUCCI, JAMES A & KAYLA M8873 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002289 UBLACK JR, LINCOLN EDWARDSUWANNEE BLACK8546 PALACIO TERRACE NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852621 UBLANCHARD, DANIEL SUTTONMARIA TERESA AUBERT OSSANDON % MARISOL BLANCHARD7020 BRAEBURN PLACEBETHESDA, MD 20817---022726006764 UBLASIG, RONALD8397 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865702 UBLETTERMAN, EDMONDLINDA ELLEN BLETTERMAN8100 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---079904131543 UBLOCK, CLEMENT HENRYSHALA DENISE BLOCK9081 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006162 UBLUZARD JR, ROBERT JAMESMICHELE BLUZARD8765 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726000841 UBOELENS, PETER P & MARIA C8265 LUCELLO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860626 UBOOKER, CHARLES P & LUCRETIA2022 LAKE STEVANSTON, IL 60201---392600467320608 UBOOTHBY REVOCABLE TRUST8515 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851907 UBORSUKEVICH, VICTOR & NINA8884 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002205 UBOSTWICK, BERNARD I & BETH A345 ADDISON PLLANCASTER, PA 17601---022726001507 UBOTHE, HENRY THOMASGWENDOLYN IRENE AUSTIN8464 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852362 UBOVARD, BRIAN DAVIDLUDMILLA SOARES BORGES8893 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003505 UBRADFIELD, JOSEPH HMARGARET M BRADFIELD8435 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852964 UBRADLEY, JEFFREY K & ROSALIE8955 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---279322726001002 UBRAUN, DOUGLAS & LORRAINE J8078 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864101 UNotice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20210001791 | Buffer: 500' | Date: 10/25/2021 | Site Location: Hacienda Lakes MPUDPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 633Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 2BRETON, DONALD C & ELAYNE L8896 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002140 UBROUGHTON, MICHAEL MONROEREBECCA LOUISE BURTON8329 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865401 UBUCKNITZ, SANDORNE8325 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853507 UBUDETTA, ROXANASERGIO MASCH BUDETTA800 CLAUGHTON ISLAND RNO 1904MIAMI, FL 33131---031347852223 UBUFFUM, JO ANN & KENNETH LEON 8462 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855505 UBULONE, EMANUEL & ANNMARIE59 RUTLEDGE RDMARLBORO, NJ 07746---022726001222 UBUNTING TRUST7825 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268679904126684 UBURGER, JAMES RLINDA A COHEN8394 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861340 UBUTKOVICH, LEAH B & GREGORY T 37997 HURON POINTHARRISON TOWNSHI, MI 48045---031347863746 UBUTLER, JAMES ROBERT & MARILYN 8833 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003204 UC D & K L KRUSE JT REV TRUST8503 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851965 UCACACE, VINICENT T8379 PALACIO TERRACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853248 UCALDRO, DAVID A & JULIE R8595 MAGGIORE COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851305 UCAMP, WILLIAM D & ANN M20 MONROE AVEDALLAS, PA 18612---151253269005563 UCAMPISI, FRANK & BENEDETTA8876 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002247 UCANZONERI, JOHN & LINDA20 LOUDONWOOD EASTALBANY, NY 12211---031347860723 UCAPALBO III, THOMAS JGINA B CAPALBONICHOLAS E CABALBO67 HIGH STWESTERLY, RI 02891---022726007129 UCARLSON, ANTHONY CDIANNE L W CARLSONP O BOX 277WILLERNIE, MN 55090---031347856368 UCARLY J GARRISON DSC TRUST8105 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---079904130340 UCARMAN DRIVE 15 LLC7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---000417000004 UCARROLL JR, CHARLES WMICHELE A CARROLL8860 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #102NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000448 UCARTER, JAMES C & DARLENE A8480 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856009 UCARUSONE, FRANCESCA8427 PALACIO TER SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853002 UCASAGRANDE FAMILY TRUST4 PLUMWOOD DRMETHUEN, MA 01844---031347855123 UCHARLES G FERRIS REV TRUST7539 WILLOW SPRING DRKNOXVILLE, TN 37938---404679904128145 UCHISCAVAGE, JESSE JMICHELLE ELAINE CHISCAVAGE8903 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001442 UCHRISTOPHER, MEGAN ELIZABETH8416 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861463 UCHRISTOS TR, GEORGE HGEORGE H CHRISTOS REV TRUST JOYCE A CHRISTOS TRJOYCE A CHRISTOS REV TRUST5865 W 124TH STALSIP, IL 60803---350179904130227 UCIAVARELLA, JOHN & TRACY W20 LORRAINE DRBEACON FALLS, CT 06403---031347853989 UCIRILLO, LOUIS P & SUSAN E28 CENTRAL STBRISTOL, RI 02809---031347855204 UCIRINO TR, ANTHONY PMARILYN K CIRINO TRANTHONY P CIRINO TRUSTMARILYN K CIRINO TRUST7840 SUNRISE LNRUSSELL, OH 44072---940379904131666 UCLARK REVOCABLE TRUST8388 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864347 UCLARK REVOCABLE TRUST8913 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002467 UCLARK, CHRISTOPHER LEEMELISSA LYNN EDGINGTON8461 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---281831347855466 UCOCKSEDGE, PAULLESLIE WHITE4600 WINGED FOOT WAY #204NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005327 UCODY, MICHAEL P6857 MICHAELS CIRCLETINLEY PARK, IL 60477---031347863788 UCOKE, MARION & BERNETT O8541 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855107 UCOLAVECCHIO, MARIE RMICHAEL A COLAVECCHIO8071 CAILE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863568 UCOLLIER CNTYTRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SNAPLES, FL 34104---073620100443 UCOLLIER CNTY JUNIORDEPUTIES LEAGUE INCPO BOX 1833NAPLES, FL 34106---183300418401000 UCOLLIER CNTY JUNIOR DEPUTIES LEAGUE INC3200 BAILEY LN STE 199NAPLES, FL 34105---000418400409 UCOLLIER COUNTY3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL ENAPLES, FL 34112---048586001035 UCOLLIER COUNTY JUNIORDEPUTIES LEAGUE INCPO BOX 1833NAPLES, FL 34106---183300418401107 UCOLLIER HMA INC% ALTUS GROUPPO BOX 92129SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092---000433440004 UCOLUCCI, GARY A & MARIA R8021 CALLE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863982 UCOMPTON, JOHN C & KATHERINE B 8454 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861641 UCONVERY, THOMAS GERARDCRISTINA ALMARINES CONVERY 8285 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853701 UCONWAY, THOMAS & ANNA MARIE 208 AMBIANCE BLVDFREEHOLD, NJ 07728---022726002124 UCORBIN, ALLEN R & DEBRA L8384 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864363 UCORIO, JOSEPH D & CLARA A8297 LUCELLO TER NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853646 UCORTESE, CAROL M8300 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853963 UCOSTELLO, JAMES T & COLLEEN D 7808 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904128200 UCOUTO, CHRISTOPHERHUI WANG12 NEWTON COURTCROTON-ON-HUDSON, NY 10520---031347864486 UCRAIG, DEBORAH K & JAY A8933 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002564 UCRAIG, RYAN RICHARD696 WOODLAND HILL COURTMEDINA, MN 55340---022726002548 UCRAIG, WAYNE J4610 WINGED FOOT WAYNAPLES, FL 34112---053269005084 UCRANDELL, GARY & CONNIE8446 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856106 UCROWELL, DOUGLAS ACHARLENE S CROWELL9030 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006683 UCUIFFO, STEVEPO BOX 630219MIAMI, FL 33163---21900437760007 UCUIFFO, STEVEN RPO BOX 630219MIAMI, FL 33163---21900437400008 UCUOZZO, PETER J & JOSEPHINE M8944 SAINT LUCIA DR #102NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000040 UDALUISE LIVING TRUST8366 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854409 UD'AMICO FAMILY TRUST8376 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864402 UD'AMICO, MICHAEL L & MARY LOU 8471 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856326 UDAMON, DONALD8933 MUSTIQUE LNNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001565 UD'ANCONA, FRANCIS P & ANITA17 LEA DRCHADDS FORD, PA 19317---031347853167 UDANERI, PATRICIO MARIAKELLY ANNE DANERI1095 LAURELWOODCARMEL, IN 46032---022726000867 UD'ANGELO, DAVID4600 WINGED FOOT WAY #203NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005301 UDANIEL HELFMAN &ANGELA LA SALLE FAMILY TRUST 8414 PALACIO TERRACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852922 UDANIEL SHAPIRO REVOCABLE TRUST 2655 NW 83RD WAYCOOPER CITY, FL 33024---031347864703 UDANIELI 2015 FAMILY TRUST6072 NORTH SAUGANASH AVECHICAGO, IL 60646---022726001905 UDARNELL, JOHN W & DANA H8844 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #101NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000189 UDAVID & JUDITH WHITE R/L TRUST 303 MORGAN ROADNAPLES, FL 34114---256300434240009 UDAVID L BRACKMAN TRUST8094 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864185 UDAVID L TORNETTO REV LIV TRUST 651 HICKORY LANEFRONTENAC, MO 63131---022726002483 UDAVID P KOVECK & ANN MMUZA KOVECK 2002 REV TRUST N54 W21027 CARTERS XING CIRCLEMENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051---026141000228 UDEAN, PATRICK C & CHRISTINA M8955 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003806 UDEFAZIO-JAMES, PAULETTE THAROLD A JAMES8102 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864224 UDEIGER, SUSAN L4030 DEER RUN CTMAUMEE, OH 43557---031347852184 UDEMA, LAWRENCE JABBY J MURRAY8340 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864583 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 634Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 3DENISE LEE NYMAN-FINKE TRUST 502 KEEPATAW DRIVELEMONT, IL 60439---053269005602 UDEONARINE, KELVIN3764 KENT DRNAPLES, FL 34112---374079904128268 UDEPRIEST, JANICE LYNNBRENT GALEN DEPRIEST8442 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856122 UDESSLER, RICHARD JAY8886 SAINT LUCIA DR UNIT 101NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000341 UDEUTMEYER, JEFFREY APIERRETTE L DEUTMEYER9036 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726009321 UDIBENEDETTO, VITTORIOMARIE DIBENEDETTO8098 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864208 UDIDONATO, ALFRED PDIANA ROSE DIDONATO8860 SAINT LUCIA DR #101NAPLES, FL 34114---281526141000422 UDIETERLE, JOSEPH A & MARY M162 OLDFIELD WAYOKATIE, SC 29909---000467320307 UDIGIROLARNO REVOCABLE TRUST 9035 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726007080 UDIMENICHI, TONY ANGELODEBORAH ANN DIMENICHI8354 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854344 UDINH, HIEU TRUNGYEN HOANG NGUYEN7711 COLLIER BLVD UNIT # 102NAPLES, FL 34114---022726001824 UDIPACE JR, SALVATORE & CAMILLE 6 MEADOW CTOAKDALE, NY 11769---031347861502 UDIPIETRO, DOROTHY CAROL377 PATTON DRCHESHIRE, CT 06410---423579904128161 UDISANTI, DAVID M & JANENE K129 APPLEWOOD LANESLIPPERY ROCK, PA 16057---031347855563 UDIVOSTA HOMES LP24311 WALDEN CENTER DR # 300BONTA SPRINGS, FL 34134---082679008082 UDOBOS, TIBOR & ANDREA8316 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854043 UDOLIGOSA, GRACE BWILLARD CHARLES HILL8474 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861748 UDONNA SANTOS FAMILY TRUST8089 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---269679904130269 UD'ONOFRIO, EDWARD & STEPHANIE 1533 HULSEMAN STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19145---031347852003 UDOOLEY, JOSEPH MICHAEL8343 LUCELLO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853400 UDOUGLAS P BROWN JR TRUSTLEIGH H BROWN TRUST361 PROMENADE AVENUEWARWICK, RI 02886---053269005288 UDOWD VENTURES LLC10 MULBERRY COURTSUCCASUNNA, NJ 07876---026141000406 UDOWNING, ADRIAN J & STEVEN T8976 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001167 UDUDLEY, JAMES M & JANE M1223 W GOLF RDLIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048---079904124589 UDUFFETT, ROBERT J & KATHLEEN M 56 CHRISTINA AVEBILLERICA, MA 01821---022726003288 UDUGGAN, SUJI14 WERIMUS BROOK ROADSADDLE RIVER, NJ 07458---022726001688 UDUNN, WILLIAM P CHRISTINE S3251 S SYEWART AVE UNIT BCHICAGO, IL 60616---031347855369 UDUQUE, JUAN D8959 SAITN LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003822 UDUQUE, JUAN DAVID8934 REDONA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001989 UDURKIN, RAYMOND & LAURA2240 PARK AVENUEBRIDGEPORT, CT 06604---031347851868 UDUSS, ARNE PHILIPP & JULIANNE8945 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001620 UEASTON, MARK A & SANDY L8474 S MURPHREE DRBROKEN ARROW, OK 74014---079904126749 UEATON, GREGORY & MARY J8550 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852647 UEDDY, DWIGHT P & LINDA A8467 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856300 UEDMISSON, RUSSELL CURTISELISE RIVERO EDMISSON8962 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726004106 UEDWARDS TR EST, GARY RCIRCLE LAND TRUSTUTD 2/28/014000 HOLLYWOOD BLVD STE 455HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---678500413200002 UEDWARDS TR EST, GARY RSECTION 12-A TRUSTUTD 8/4/974000 HOLLYWOOD BLVD STE 455SHOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---678500413600000 UEDWARDS TR EST, GARY RSECTION 12-G LAND TRUSTUTD 8/4/97% MICHAEL J SNYDER & ASSOC4000 HOLLYWOOD BLVD STE 455S HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---678500413520009 UEDWARDS TR EST, GARY RSECTION 12-J LAND TRUSTUTD 04/01/98%MICHAEL J SNYDER & ASSOC PA4000 HOLLYWOOD BLVD STE 455 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---678500412400007 UEDWARDS, ANTHONY & DONNA23 KRONENBERG STTINTON FALLS, NJ 07724---031347863403 UELLIOT TANNENVAUM REV TRUST SUSAN J TANNENBAUM REV TRUST 11 WILLOW PLGREAT NECK, NY 11021---022726006900 UELLSWORTH, GARY & DIANE7707 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904125148 UENNIS, JOHN MATTHEWJUDITH MARIE ENNISTRACEY MARIE SEBERG8865 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003369 UEPSTEIN, HOWARD B & JENNIFER A RANDALL P=& ALICE M ANDREOZZI5547 MEADOWGLEN DRCLARENCE CENTER, NY 14032---053269005424 UERIC K WALTERS LIVING TRUST518 GRATEN STREETBIRMINGHAM, MI 48009---031347853840 UESPLANADA AT HACIENDA LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC28100 BONITA GRANDE DRSUITE 203BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---031347860202 UESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC28100 BONITA GRANDE DRSUITE 203BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---031346489024 UEUGENE P CAMPBELL REV TRUST HARRIET J CAMPBELL REV TRUST 9087 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726005668 UEVANS, TERRI8366 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852689 UEVERGLADES CITY DEVP LLCC/O LAMAR JERNIGAN NORIEGA100 ANDALUSIA AVE #213CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---000433000004 UEVERGLADES RANCH LLC13011 COCO PLUM LNNAPLES, FL 34119---853100412280007 UFAHEY, WALTER JNANCY R DAURIO27 LANGTON DRHOLMDEL, NJ 07733---022726001769 UFAY, JON W & CATHERINE M8367 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853303 UFAZIO, JENNIFER L8987 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006861 UFERRARO JR, JOSEPH P & ELLEN M8458 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856041 UFIGUERDO, ALFONNANCY MARGARITA MERIDA 901 BRICKELL KEY BLVD #706MIAMI, FL 33131---031347853028 UFINAZZO, MARIA ROSE8977 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001785 UFIORE, ANTHONY CARLNANCY VANESSA SANCHEZ8848 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #101NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000105 UFITCH JR, ROBERT W & GAIL F8383 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853222 UFLESHMAN, ANDREA4125 HILLTOP ROADMAHWAH, NJ 07430---031347864169 UFLORIAN, ANNE MARIA8084 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---269579904131608 UFLOYD, IRA LENORRISNORMA CIRILLO FLOYD112 HACKBERRY LN #16DEL RIO, TX 78840---031347855521 UFLYNN, DENNIS M & CATHERINE8370 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852702 UFODERA, VINCENZA32 COOLIDGE RDMEDFORD, MA 02155---022726006803 UFOLLETT, MARY EMMA RMALCOLM PADINA8762 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002580 UFORESTAR USA REAL ESTATEGROUP INC2221 E LAMAR BLVD STE 790ARLINGTON, TX 76006---000433160009 UFORSTER TR, ROBERT G & ADELE ROBERT G FORSTER TRUST ADELE A FORSTER TRUSTUTD 10/5/05 UTD 10/5/053150 WELLINGTON CTW BLOOMFIELD, MI 48324---216153269005204 UFORTUNE, JASON282 BRANDY LNNAPLES, FL 34114---000438360202 UFOSTER REVOCABLE TRUST8443 PALACIO TERR WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852265 UFOSTER, ROBERT STUARTDONNELLE MAUREEN FOSTER 8198 LUCELLO TERRACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860943 UFRANCES ROSA REVOCABLE TRUST 8310 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347870085 UFREED, CATHY A7804 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268579904128226 UFREP IVNAPLES LAKE VILLAGE LLC2501 S MACDILL AVETAMPA, FL 33629---062030900024 UFRICAS, VICTOR & CYNTHIA8489 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855327 UFRISONE, NICHOLAS ANTHONY8217 LUCELLO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860862 UFULLAM, KENNETH & NICOLE M8986 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006845 UG E & R E PALCHUS TRUST8612 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851761 UGAGLIARDI, BRET M & KATHRYN C 530 N SHORE BLVDFOX ISLAND, WA 98333---022726005464 UGALARRAGA, JUAN JOSEALEJANDRA CARVAJAL5650 COMSTOCK LANE NPLYMOUTH, MN 55446---026141000309 UGALLETTI, DARRYL E & DEBRA J8506 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852427 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 635Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 4GAMBINO, JAMES A & MICHELE L8386 PALACIO TERRACE SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852786 UGARCIA, LUIS E245 S ADDISON RDADDISON, IL 60101---031347865281 UGARDNER, GREGORY W & NANCY A5249 CHAMBERS CTMCCORDSVILLE, IN 46055---031347856342 UGARRIS, HENRY H & GINA M8115 CALLE CANOVAS STREETNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863348 UGASSER, FRANK G & KAREN L9070 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006489 UGEELAN, JOHN M & MARY BETH8910 SAINT LUCIA DR #202NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000325 UGEORGE REVOCABLE TRUST7706 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126202 UGEORGE W MERRELL JR REV TRUST 8378 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347854616 UGERKEN, JANICE8905 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003563 UGERMANA, ANTHONY MFRANCES GERMANA8479 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852087 UGIANGROSSI, PATRICIADAVID MICHAEL GIANGROSSI 8909 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003589 UGIARRIZZI, FRANK PAULKARLA YVONNE GIARRIZZI8289 LUCELLO TERR NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853688 UGIUSEPPE POMPEO LIVING TRUST LIDIA ROTILI LIVING TRUST8931 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003686 UGLEASON, KEVIN J & SUSAN M8104 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---079904131527 UGODFREY, M ANDREW THOMASSHAWN MICHAEL GODFREY8322 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347870027 UGODFREY, SHAWN MICHAELM I ANDREW THOMAS GODFREY8318 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347870043 UGOJCAJ, PASKO & HANNA1431 MCGRAIN LANEHOWELL, MI 48843---031347855628 UGOLDMANN, KENNETH MJUDITH P GOODLIFE%TBI MORTGAGE COMPANYCUSTOMER SERVICE1140 VIRGINIA DRFORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034---022726002027 UGOMEZ, ANTHONY R & ALMA C7845 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268679904126781 UGOODRICH, GUY WILLIAMPATRICIA CORBELL GOODRICH 9043 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006324 UGOULD, JAMES M & MARY8588 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851648 UGRADY, COLLEEN AROY W SCARLETT9016 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726009428 UGRANT EST, CAROL-JEAN288 BRANDY LNNAPLES, FL 34114---257000438360707 UGRANT, ANGELA HALLWALKER W GRANT330 RIDGE WATCHALEXANDER CITY, AL 35010---026141000464 UGRAY, JOHN F & ELLEN V8088 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---269579904131585 UGRIEB, THOMAS E & MARYANN8774 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002629 UGRIMMER, ANTHONY C & DIANE H 8439 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856164 UGUKELBERGER JR, THOMAS FGERALDINE M GUKELBERGER 8407 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853109 UGULLIFA, WILLIAM A & TRIENA M11 VERDE CIRREADING, MA 01867---106079904128349 UGUNAWARDANA, VAJIRA KRUWINI D DESILVA8909 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002441 UGUPTA, ALOK KUMARLEAH KRISTINE GUPTA2501 BROOKHAVEN CTZIONSVILLE, IN 46077---022726001549 UHAASS, EDWARD ARON LANGCRISTINA ANN HAASS9046 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006641 UHABIBI REVOCABLE TRUST8205 LUCELLO TERRACE WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860927 UHACIENDA LAKES CMNTY DEV DIST % REAS EST ECONOMETRICS INC707 ORCHID DR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34102---031374000129 UHACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT% REAL ESTATE ECONOMETRICS INC707 ORCHID DR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34102---048586005060 UHACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---000412560002 UHAEJU ABRESCH REV TRUST1138 HIGHLAND POINTE DRST LOUIS, MO 63131---031347852809 UHAGEL, DEBORAH H & CHARLES W 916 SANCTUARY LANENAPERVILLE, IL 60540---031347863966 UHAGUE, THERESA L8769 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726000825 UHALL, RICHARD8399 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853141 UHAMMOCK PARK APARTMENTS7742 ALICO ROADFT MYERS, FL 33912---000416720000 UHAMMOCK WOODS LLC12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102FORT MYERS, FL 33907---568673620100485 UHAMMOCK WOODS LLC42 BARKLEY CIR STE 3FORT MYERS, FL 33907---454373620100508 UHANNOOSH, JAMES & SARAH4 MILLBROOK LANEBOLTON, MA 01740---031347853280 UHARE, CHRISTINA KEUNGALEXANDER C HAREMICHELLE A HARE7 SOMERVILLE STFAIRFIELD, CT 06824---031347863665 UHARPER, JOHN G & LUCIMAR V8886 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #201NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000383 UHARPER, RALPH E & LILIANA M8535 PALACIO TERRACE NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851826 UHARTLEY, ROBERT G & BONNIE LEE 8845 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003262 UHARTMAN, JANET E7812 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268579904128187 UHARVEY, ANTHONY & LAURA3655 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374000747 UHAUGLAND, JULIE ANNJOSHUA BLAKE HAUGLAND8040 CALLE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863704 UHENDRICK, KEVIN K & MARGARET A9071 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726007349 UHERMAN G DIEBLER TRUST8482 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855589 UHERMAN, MITCHELL LOUISNANCY SUSAN HERMAN8939 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000922 UHERNANDEZ, DAVID R & JUDITH A 8396 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864305 UHERNANDEZ, KENNETH JCHERYL M HERNANDEZ515 MOUNTAINVIEW AVEVALLEY COTTAGE, NY 10989---031347854027 UHILDEBRANDT, RANDY WSHARON A HILDEBRANDT8375 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853264 UHILL, GREGORY & DONNAP O BOX 508DEAL, MD 20751---031347860545 UHILLSTROM, RICHARD D & SUSAN M 7703 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904125122 UHINDERMAN, MATTHEW MSUSAN M HINDERMAN2562 WOODCLIFF CTLISLE, IL 60532---031347851282 UHIRSCH, MARK & TALI20123 NE 19TH PLMIAMI, FL 33179---161000413560001 UHIRSCHFELD, DAVID R & DEBRA A 8960 MUSTIQUE LNNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001248 UHITEN, THOMAS & ALISON5525 STABLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---000413280006 UHOFFMAN, ANDREW P & CAROL L8936 ST LUCIA DRIVE #202NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000163 UHOFFMAN, DAVID & SHEREE20 TRAFALGAR SQ #205LINCOLNSHIRE, IL 60069---053269005068 UHOLLAND, JOYCE5450 STABLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---122000412480001 UHOLLOWAY, ROBERT B8438 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856148 UHOUK, RYAN PATRICK & DEBORAH 8943 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000948 UHUCKSTEP, STUART & MARY E8475 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852100 UHUDSON, CAROLYN W5453 COCKER SPANIEL CTIRON STATION, NC 28080---000416320002 UHUGHES, KENNETH P & ELLEN A8925 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002522 UHYDRANGA HOUSE OF NEWPORT INC 61 OCEANWOODS DRIVE8555 MAGGIORE CTNORTH KINGSTOWN, RI 02852---031347851486 UIERVOLINO, ROBERT WMAUREEN W IERVOLINO8450 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861625 UIMPELLUSO, ROBERT87 WALDEN CTBERLIN, CT 06037---022726005642 UINGENITO LIVING TRUST8532 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855783 UINMAN, SHAWN PATRICKBRYN KOENIG INMAN6628 BELFAIR CTZIONSVILLE, IN 46077---022726002108 UISAACS, MITCH & JEAN7714 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126163 UISABELLA, AMALIA MARIAALAN MICHAEL ISABELLA8963 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001044 UISHAM, JOHN ARTHURHEATHER SHARON DERR8563 MAGGIORE COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851444 UIZZILLO, JOSEPH B & MICHELLE E3702 WINNER CIRRAPID CITY, SD 57702---079904130188 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 636Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 5J F SANFILIPPO NON EXMPT GST8241 LUCELLO TERRACE WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860749 UJ M SCHIMMING WHITE REV TRUST 8317 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---817631347853549 UJ&J SMITH TRUST7722 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126121 UJAMAL, TANWEER S & MUMTAZ8392 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864321 UJANE LEE BETTS REV TRUST4630 WINGED FOOT CT APT 201NAPLES, FL 34112---841853269005589 UJARIKOV, VIKTORIRYNA LABACHOVA316 MORGAN RDNAPLES, FL 34114---256200436160006 UJEAN V KLISKA REV LIV TRUST8965 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001727 UJIM & SUSAN SPISSO TRUST8447 PALACIO TERRACE WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852249 UJOHANNEMANN, JOHN P & JOANN 8543 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851800 UJOHN P ARNOLD IIIMELISSA BERRY21071 SIX LIS FARM RDESTERO, FL 33928---000437560003 UJOHNSON, CHARLES JKATHERINE E JOHNSON8016 WILFREDO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904130146 UJOHNSON, CRAIG M8458 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855482 UJOHNSON, HUBERT & MICHELE63 PINES TREE DRMETHUEN, MA 01844---031347854483 UJOHNSON, ROBERTA MEIDINGER8983 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003929 UJOHNSON, RONALD3644 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374000404 UJOJOKIAN, JACKSON HAGOPSHERI ANNE P JOJOKIAN8199 LUCELLO TERRACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860600 UJONES, ERIC D & MICHELE11 FREDERICKS LANEMAHOPAC, NY 10541---022726001646 UJONES, HAROLDCHERYL HARPER JONES8944 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #202NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000082 UJONES, KEVIN T & SANDRA L8086 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864143 UJOSEPH F FOOS REV LIV TRUSTMARILYN W FOOS REV LIV TRUST8488 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855602 UJOURDEN, CYNTHIA C8229 LUCELLO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860804 UJOYCE SZPEJNOWSKI TRUST929 FARM GLEN LNCAROL STREAM, IL 60188---294179904130366 UK M & K M HAGEDORN JOINT TRUST 8966 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001866 UKACOS FAMILY TRUST OF 19988524 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855741 UKAPLAN, JOSHUA M & PATRICIA A8942 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001947 UKARAM, ANTHONY G & PATRICIA A 8958 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001882 UKARTISEK, TIMOTHY JKRISTEN B KARTISEK4301 PERIAN COURTMEDINA, OH 44256---022726003880 UKARTSOUNES TR, JAMES WCYNTHIA M KARTSOUNES TR KARTSOUNES FMLY 2003 DECL TR UTD 08/14/037902 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268979904129403 UKASE, RONALD D & DONNA M8324 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854085 UKASSHAM LLC10507 EMERALD CHASE DRORLANDO, FL 32839---031347860707 UKATZ, DANIEL I & RUTH V8888 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002182 UKATZ, VLADIMIREMMA GAKANTHONY ERIC GAK8505 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855246 UKEEVER, JEFFREY SCOTT8971 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001086 UKELLER, LANETTE K8272 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853824 UKELLY JR, JAMES RJACQUELINE C CAHILL25 BARRINGTON CTSCHENECTADY, NY 12309---031347855149 UKELLY, DONNA A & WILLIAM F37 SLEEPY HOLLOW RDRED BANK, NJ 07701---022726002302 UKENT, JEFFREY P & SUSAN F7910 VALENTINA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904129380 UKHAYAT, JOSEPH M & MARIANNE P8398 PALACIO TERRACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852841 UKING, JOSEPH A & CHARLANE G8352 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854221 UKINGSBURY, KENNETH AGLORIA J KINGSBURY8079 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863526 UKINGSTON JR, JOHN DCHERYL GELINEAU KINGSTON 8901 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003547 UKIRK TR, MARY LMARY L KIRK REV TRUSTUTD 12/05/038096 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---079904131569 UKNOTEK, THOMAS & RENNA8432 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347861544 UKOCH, STEVEN D & LINDA A6643 S W WENTLEY LANETOPKEKA, KS 66614---031347856245 UKORRA, MOHAMEDDOAA EBADY8446 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347861609 UKRAVETZ, WILLIAM J & JANET F7711 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268279904125164 UKREINDEL, MARK S & SHARON A2 KENWOOD COURTBEACHWOOD, OH 44122---031347860561 UKRINSKY, DANNSHARON A GEHRMANN4630 WINGED FOOT CT #204NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005644 UKROLL REV TRUST8587 MAGGIORE COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---260031347851347 UKT40 LLC7965 TIGER LILLY DRNAPLES, FL 34113---000438040001 UKUEHN, FRANCIS X & MURIEL A8321 LUCELLO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853523 UKUEHN, FREDERICK C & JILL H10 BRADISH LNBABYLON, NY 11702---031347852401 UKULSCAR, CARLEEN R8512 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855686 UKURAS, DENNIS ANTHONYELIZABETH S KURAS8062 PRINCETON DRNAPLES, FL 34104---031347861382 UKWIECINSKI, MICHAEL & BARBARA 8390 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861366 ULABARBIERA, VINCENT & MICHELE 1 FARMSTEAD RDMAHWAH, NJ 07430---031347852825 ULACARIA, PAMELA J8029 CALLE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864020 ULADOWITZ, LISA BETH9003 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726005286 ULAIDLAW, RICHARD ASTEPHANIE A LAIDLAW573 CHINNOCK LANERIVER FALLS, WI 54022---031347864282 ULANDES, JACK W & LAUREN A275 FRONTIER TRAILLUSBY, MD 20657---031347853125 ULANG, LORA ANN & ROBERT W8510 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---258531347852443 ULANNON, THOMAS S & JULIA A8580 MAGGIORE COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851606 ULANSBERRY, MARY ANNKALIS, KRISTEN=& TODD8558 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851525 ULAPPA JR, LOUIS EDONALD D LAUSCHE8328 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854108 ULAROCHE, MARIA8382 PALACIO TERR SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852760 ULAUTATO JR, VINCENT MKIMBERLY L KASPER8016 CALLE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863827 ULEE-GAUGHAN, ROSE M8526 PALACIO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852524 ULENGLE, TODD BROSSMANRACHEL P LANGLE9007 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006942 ULENNON, MARVIN N & CHERYL L317 PARKLAWN CTLANCASTER, PA 17601---266700467320501 ULENTINI, LINDA8527 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851842 ULEON, CHRISTINE ANNFRANK DAVID MORIS LEON6523 N CLARENCE AVECHICAGO, IL 60631---022726009347 ULERDON, MARC J10591 REGENT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34109---182600436800405 ULESNIAK, JERZY & ANNA8473 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855408 ULEWISON TR, RICKIE LDIANE M LEWISON TRR L & D M LEWISON LIV TRUST UTD 08/11/987914 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268979904129364 ULICHTINGER, MOISES & RINA8013 CALLE CONOVAS CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863940 ULINDA M GHELFI REV TRUST8259 YASMINA WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---079904131682 ULINSENMAIER, RICHARD HKATHLEEN M LINSENMAIER8485 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855343 ULIOTTA, CHARLES JNICOLA J LIOTTA8097 XENIA LANENAPLES, FL 34114---079904130308 ULIPANI, CARL & LISA14 COUNTRY CLUB LNMIDDLETON, MA 01949---053269005042 ULISA PERRI GREGORY J BERSIEREVOCABLE LIFETIME TRUST 8253 LUCELLO TER WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860684 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 637Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 6LISSER, HARRY8970 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001840 ULOMBARDO, MICHAEL S & MARY F 8332 LUCELLO TERR NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854124 ULORDS WAY 30 LLC7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33192---031374000048 ULOUZON, THEODORE JELIZABETH A LOUZON7923 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904128365 ULOWSKY, JOHN M & ROSEMARIE8386 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854506 ULUDWIG FAMILY REV TRUST3740 TURNBERRY DRMEDINA, OH 44256---079904128129 ULUK, RICK SUEN KICATHERINE THOAI HOA LUK8961 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001701 ULUP, BENIAMIN GHEORGHE9096 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726009046 ULUP, GHEORGHETEODORA FLORIDA LUP8897 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003521 UMACANDREW, RHONDA PIAR973 REDWING DRCOPPELL, TX 75019---031347852566 UMACDONALD, ALAN BRUCEPATRICIA ELAINE MACDONALD8944 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #201NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000066 UMACEYKO, RONALD & MARY M508 FARNDALE ROAD UNIT 508PITTSBURGH, PA 15238---079904128307 UMACUMBER, DAVE8107 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863380 UMAGASIC, MARIO & CORINNE8356 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864509 UMAGNUSSON, JOAN8520 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855725 UMAHAN, LAURA A2513 FIELDSTOWN DRLA GRANGE, KY 40031---031347852281 UMAHN, LAURA B8913 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---290222726003602 UMALAKOFF, DAVIDCAROL SWARTZ8292 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853921 UMAMBUCA, LEE H & FRANCINE M8568 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851541 UMANCHAK, ROBERT & MICHELLE13280 MONIX DRST JOHN, IN 46373---053269005246 UMANDALAY 6192 LLCBURNETT 925 CO-OP INC2519 CHAMBERLAIN STE 101AMES, IA 50014---031347854593 UMARK S & JANET M BURKOT TRUST 21 TOURNAMENT TEE DRIVEDARDENNE PRAIRE, MO 63368---079904131501 UMARKMAN, LISA RENEE8074 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864088 UMARKS, ROBERT PATRICKMICHELLE JENNIFER MARKS 8995 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006887 UMARQUISS, MARK & CAROLINE8979 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003903 UMARTIN, CAROL B & DANIEL8472 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856025 UMARTIN, ROY & MARYBETH8385 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865647 UMARTIN, WAYNE & DEBORAH8483 PALACIO TER WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852061 UMARTINOVIC, ANTE & ZARKA9023 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726005383 UMASON, CHRISTOPHER & AMBRE8511 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851923 UMATHEWS, CARL THOMAS-JOHNGAIL ANN MATHEWS8990 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006829 UMATTHEWS, MATTHEW ADAM8025 CALLE CANOVAS CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864004 UMC GUIRE, ELIZABETH A8288 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---815031347853905 UMCCAIN, PATRICK J9031 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726005406 UMCDEVITT JR, WILLIAM JNORINE F MCDEVITT8877 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003424 UMCDONALD, DAVID CHARLESGAYE PATTERSON MCDONALD 8268 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853808 UMCDONALD, JANET ELLENCORNELIUS EDWARD MCDONALD 8487 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856407 UMCFADDEN JR, DAVID R9066 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006463 UMCFARLANE, JOHNSANDRA HELEN MCFARLANE 80 COUNTRY ROUTE 62WESTTOWN, NY 10998---031347863649 UMCGOWAN, JAMES & ROBIN8251 YASMINA WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---079904131640 UMCGRAW, BETSY8404 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347861405 UMCLOUGHLIN, ANN3647 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374000705 UMCMANUS, ANDREW BLAUREN E TRETHEWEY8857 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003327 UMCNAMEE, JEFFREY P & SUSAN M 8757 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000883 UMCQUEEN, MAUREEN GARRY1013 KEITH RDWAKE FOREST, NC 27587---022726006405 UMCROBERTS, THOMAS MICHAELREBECCA KATHLEEN MCROBERTS 8406 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852883 UMEDINA, JULIO11 KELLY COURTSANDY HOOK, CT 06482---031347851981 UMELANIE W HARPER REV LIV TRUST 8036 CALLE CANOVAS CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863720 UMENESES-ESPINOSA, CAROLINACARLOS A ESPINOSA485 HARBOR SIDE ST #614WOODBRIDGE, VA 22191---022726003987 UMERCEDE JR JOHN JJULIANNE K SANTINI8596 MAGGIORE COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851680 UMERRITT, ANN MARIE8013 WILFREDO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---269479904129487 UMERRYFIELD, DONALD RUSSELLVITA MONACO MERRYFIELD8869 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003385 UMESSINA, PAUL M & LAURA ANNMATTHEW P MESSINA8491 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852029 UMICHAEL S DERO REV TRUSTJACALYN A DERO REV TRUST 8329 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853484 UMICHAEL TERENZIO LIVING TRUST JOAN K TERENZIO LIVING TRUST 9047 MONTSERRAT DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006308 UMIDLAND IRA INCPAULINE RENAULT THOMAS IRA 5785 COPE LANENAPLES, FL 34112---031347852485 UMIDOLO FAMILY LIVING TRUST7832 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268579904128080 UMIKULECKY, THOMAS JOHNTERESA ANN MIKULECKY8939 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003725 UMILAVSKY, BARRY & JUDITH C7926 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268979904129306 UMILLER, DOUG & MICHELLE P4905 DRENDEL ROADGROVE, IL 60515---022726003709 UMILLET, MARY G3791 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374001225 UMINA, ANTHONY G8483 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856384 UMINA, PETER A & CYNTHIA J4 MERLIN CIRCLESHREWSBURY, MA 01545---031347853060 UML LAND LLC7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---000418400755 UMOHR, MICHAEL H & MAUREEN1610 N MOHAWK ST UNIT ACHICAGO, IL 60614---031347863924 UMOLLOY, BRIAN JAMES & DIANA L 8783 ST LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000760 UMONGENE-EGGER, MARIE GENEVE LAWRENCE JAMES EGGER9014 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006722 UMONZONE, JOHN J & KAREN L8966 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726004083 UMORAWIEC, EDWARD & MARIA8885 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726002344 UMORROW, JAMES E & JANICE L8347 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853387 UMOTLUCK, JEFFERY CMATTHEW CHARLES PECK8225 LUCELLO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860820 UMOYE, RICHARD DARRELLDIXIE ANN MOYE8936 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #201NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000147 UMURATORE JR, FREDERICK MELLEN LANTRY MURATORE8861 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003343 UMURPHY, DANIEL BRIANCHRISTINE ANN MURPHYW296 N1742 HIDDEN CREEK CTPEWAUKEE, WI 53072---053269005385 UMURRAY, ELIZABETH G8060 CALLE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863607 UMURRAY, PATRICIA8087 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863487 UMUSTACHI, DAVIDTANIA SOMEILLAN-MUSTACHI 8947 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003767 UNANNINI REVOCABLE TRUST9062 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006447 UNAPLES CLUB ESTATESHOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION INC % ASSET RECOVERY GROUP2520 CORAL WAY #2515CORAL GABLES, FL 33145---026123000123 UNAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUBHOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVDNAPLES, FL 34112---062030000380 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 638Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 7NEBBIA, ROBERT C & JEAN M8918 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002043 UNICK VITULLO TRUSTKYLE M VITULLO TRUST714 N DOUGLAS AVEARLINGTON HEIGHT, IL 60004---561022726007145 UNIEMANN, RICHARD J & PAULA K1416 REGENT DRMUNDELEIN, IL 60060---031347855660 UNILSEN, THOMAS W & ROBIN A8111 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863364 UNIRO, PATRICK N129 RIDGE ROADRUMSON, NJ 07760---031347861560 UNOBLE, GEOFFREY J & DEBORAH E 8459 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856261 UNOVAK, VITALINA760 CENTRAL AVE #5LHIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035---079904130201 UOBERDZINSKI, ANTHONYPAMELA OBERDZINSKI7809 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268679904126600 UOGIONY, JOHN & PATRICIA1765 AQUETONG RDNEW HOPE, PA 18938---079904129461 UOJEDA, IVANHOE RODRIGUEZAIMARA PEREZ SOCORRO7836 UMBERTO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904128064 UOLEZZA, RAUL LUIS8889 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726002360 UO'MARA FAMILY NOMINEE TRUST 24 SEQUOIA DRIVEMETHUEN, MA 01844---022726001523 UON CLOUD PARTNERS LLC340 9TH STREET N #88NAPLES, FL 34102---022726002221 UONEILL, THOMAS J & SUZANNE M181 MAILANDS ROADFAIRFIELD, CT 06824---053269005628 UORTEGA, DEBORAH8008 CALLE CANOVASNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863869 UOSMON, JAMES BLAKEKATHLEEN MURIEL OSMON8091 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863461 UOTERO, JENNIFER & DANIEL8083 CALLIE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863500 UOWEN, ROBERT V & BARBARA H8970 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726004067 UOWENS, NANCY KJEROME WEITZNER205 RAINTREE CIRCLEKALAMAZOO, MI 49006---031347863623 UO-ZONE INVESTMENTS USA LTD16304 CORSICA WAYUNIT 201NAPLES, FL 34110---073620100647 UPACE, DONNA LEE7821 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126668 UPAEGLOW, PAUL N & MARY D8938 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001963 UPAGLIUCA, JOSEPH ACHRISTGINE M PAGLIUCA9027 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726007048 UPALMINTERI, JOSEPH A & DEBRA R8968 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001206 UPAOLONI, JOHNLINDA M LYON429 BARCLAY AVEALTAMONTE SPG, FL 32701---622900467320802 UPAPPALARDO, ARLENE FRANCIS8963 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003848 UPARRADO, SHIRLEY GIL415 NW DOVER CTPORT SAINT LUCIE, FL 34983---022726001581 UPATERNO, BRIDGET A8872 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002263 UPATRICK HOLLY AKENNETH D SMITH9011 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726005325 UPATTERSON, KENNETH HMAJORIE A PATTERSON8536 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855806 UPAUL M TODOROVICH PERSONAL ASSEST PROTECTION TRUST8525 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855165 UPAUL W HARTUNG III REV TRUST5844 ISLAND DRIVE NWCANTON, OH 44718---053269005343 UPAULINA KOSOBUD REV TRUSTMARCIA SNELL8370 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347854577 UPEARSON, RICHARD B & JOAN L4620 WINGED FOOT COURT #204NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005482 UPEDRAITA, CLAUDIO G & JANICE M 8378 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852744 UPEKER, HENRI & MICHELINE8917 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003628 UPEREZ, ARMANDO9074 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006502 UPERKOVICH, MICHAEL AKATHLEEN A PERKOVICH5155 TRILLIUM DREXPORT, PA 15632---022726003440 UPESCHERET, SHARON CAY8273 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853769 UPETERS REVOCABLE TRUST8559 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851460 UPETERSON, STEVEN GDAVID A HOOGTERP8410 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852906 UPETRONE JR, ANTONIO & RENEE8447 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856203 UPEYTON, MARK R & JENNIFER S1103 WILSHIRE CTCHAMPAIGN, IL 61821---079904125180 UPFEFFER, EILEEN201 JUNIPER LANEHANOVER, MA 02339---053269005181 UPHAN, NGOC BICH THIJORDAN PD PHAN8956 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001264 UPHILIP & JOYCE OIKLE TRUST7654 SICILIA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---267879904124563 UPIAZZA, MARK & LINDA8592 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851664 UPIERCE, ANDREW GORDONLINDA MARTINEZ-PIERCE9003 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006926 UPIZZOLANTI LIVING TRUST8380 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864389 UPOLLACK, MICHAEL & MARY8028 CALLE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863762 UPOLONIO, ANTHONY & SHARON1 HOUSTON STMETCHEN, NJ 08840---031347861049 UPOST, ROBERT G & RITA COLL7655 CRANDON BLVD UNIT 508KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149---022726006780 UPRASEK REVOCABLE TRUST7922 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268979904129322 UPRAUSE, DONALD & JOANNE M8186 LUCELLO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347861007 UPUCHIR, MICHAEL SRENEE M MORISSETTE8093 XENIA LANENAPLES, FL 34114---079904130285 UPUCILLO, SUSAN ADAMSFREDERICK JOSEPH PUCILLO JR4630 WINGED FOOT CT #103NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005547 UPUMPER FAMILY TRUST8947 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000964 UPURDOM, CHAD JEFFREYANA MARIA PURDOM8753 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000906 UPVK & NVK REVOCABLE TRUST%DR PAUL D VANDER KELEN305 BLUE SKY CIRGREEN BAY, WI 54311---849731347852663 URACETRAC PETROLEUM INC%SILVER OAK ADVISORSPO BOX 2437SMYRNA, GA 30081---243773620100595 URADTKE, JAMES P4630 WINGED FOOT CT #101NAPLES, FL 34112---053269005505 URADZINS FAMILY TRUST9077 MONTSERRAT DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006188 URAMOS JR, LUIS FELIPEMYRNA IVETTE RAMOS2008 RESERVE CTFLOWER MMOUND, TX 75028---022726003246 URAND, PETER B & SUSAN V3982 SMITH ROADFURLONG, PA 18925---022726006243 URAO, SREEPADA T K & PUSHPA8450 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852304 URATH, THOMAS, & ELAINE8458 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861667 URATHJE REVOCABLE TRUST8195 LUCELLO TERACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860587 URATHKA, TAYLOR RACHEL9039 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726005448 URAUSCH, LYNN D8237 LUCELLO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860765 UREAD REVOCABLE TRUST8951 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000980 UREED REVOCABLE TRUST7817 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268679904126642 UREED, DONALD W & BEVERLY A8001 WILFREDO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---269479904129429 URENNELL, THOMAS M & CANDACE M 8362 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854386 UREUM PROPERTIES LLC1051 COUNTRY LNBOURBONNAIS, IL 60914---932653269005262 UREVERA TR, ROBERT & ANNAROBERT J REVERA REV TRUST ANN REVERA REVOCABLE TRUST UTD BOTH 9/10/0711 SEACLIFF LNMILLER PLACE, NY 11764---152979904131624 URIASHI SR, MARK K & DIANE M872 BALFOUR STREETGROSSE POINTE PA, MI 48230---031347855644 URICH, PHILIP & CLAIRE8284 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853882 URICHARD K MASON REV TRUSTLOLA MASON REV TRUST8391 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853183 URICHARD W DOHERTY JR TRUSTPAMELA S DOHERTY TRUST8442 VIALE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031347861586 URICHARDSON, KEVIN SDOMINIQUE RICHARDSON121-16 OCEAN PROMENADE - 6DROCKAWAY PARK, NY 11694---031347852320 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 639Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 8RIDGE PROPERTY LLC C/O INDIAN HILL PARTNERS20 N WACKER DR STE 1922CHICAGO, IL 60606---000467321005 URIEHL, MARK & JOAN P8946 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001921 URIUS, RICHARD & SHIRLEY8486 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855987 URIVELA, LAURA8522 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852508 URIZK, JOSEPH & CHERYL8921 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003644 URIZZO, JACQUELINE G5204 VETERANS DRWHARTON, NJ 07885---031347861447 URIZZO, LEONARD J & SUSAN D8374 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852728 UROBB, ROBERT D & TERI J33160 WEST SHADY BEACH LANEPEQUOT LAKES, MN 56472---031347863801 UROBERT E & NANCY L SHANNONJOINT REVOCABLE TRUST7833 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126723 UROBERT S STALLARD TRUST9006 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006748 UROBERT W MUREN FAMILY TRUST 229 MUIRFIELD CTNORTH PRAIRIE, WI 53153---961779904126189 UROBERTSON, MALCOLMJUDITH C ROBERTSON42 ELM STREETFALMOUTH, MA 02540---053269005408 UROBINSON, DONALD B & BARBARA S 9058 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006421 UROCKEY, MARK & SHARON M8352 PROMOSO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---288131347864525 UROMANO, ANDRE & MARIA8516 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855709 UROMANO, ANDRE S & MARIA L8075 CALLE CANOVAS STREETNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863542 UROMERO, YINA ANDREAJORGE A RAMOS8095 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863445 UROSENSTOCK, TERRYMARIA N ROSENSTOCK1327 KANSKI CTRAHWAY, NJ 07065---031347852582 UROSHELLI TRUST8567 MAGGIORE COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851428 UROSONE, EVA & BENEDETTO3671 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374000828 UROSS JR, BRUCE E & KATHRYN P2031 WEST WASHINGTON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60612---031347852168 UROSS, PATTI ANNTHERESA J BORGHI404 EAST 75TH ST APT 2-1NEW YORK, NY 10021---022726003466 UROTKVICH, GEORGE & MARILYN J 8420 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861489 UROWLEY, JUSTIN J & ALLISON R8920 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001400 URUBIN, HAROLD A & MELANIE L8471 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---258631347852126 URUCKS, MICHAEL & VIRGINIA8269 LUCELLO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853785 URULI, ENIS & VALENTINA1415 GABRIEL LANEWARWICK, PA 18974---031347870108 URUSSEL, DAVID HOWARDWENDY LYNN RUSSEL8892 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---281022726002166 URUSSELL, CHARLES R & GINGER T 8450 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856083 URUSSO, LAWRENCE J & DIANE L8987 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003945 URUSSO, RONALD A & ANNEMARIE 9035 SAIINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726005422 URUST, KANDIES L & CATHERINE A 7829 UMBERTO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126707 URUYKHAVER, CHARLES G & JANE C8012 WILFREDO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904130162 URYAN, JOHN J & KARIN E8351 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853361 URYCHLEWSKI, BETSY MRAFAEL A SANTIAGO CORREA MARIBEL BURGOS CORREA8482 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861780 US A DELLAVILLA JR REV TRUST9093 CAICOS WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---022726007242 US AND P BOYLE FAMILY TRUST8233 LUCELLO TERR WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860781 USADRY, BEHROOZ & CHRISTINE7918 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904129348 USALE, GRACE & ALLEGRINO100 LANDER AVESTATEN ISLAND, NY 10314---031347864745 USAMBUS, GEORGE C & MARIE E8975 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001109 USANDBLOM, DENNIS A & JOANNE M 8575 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851389 USARHAN, RYAN & CRISTINA LAGO 9078 MONTSERRT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006528 USARLO III, LOUIS & CHERYL2 BEAGLE LAKE RDNAPLES, FL 34114---000435040004 USAUNDERS, EVANDA BEVERLEYLAWRENCE ANTHONY SAUNDERS8799 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000689 USBOGOM INVESTMENTS LLC5048 S ASTOR CIRDELRAY BEACH, FL 33484---031347853565 USCACCIA, FRANK & JACQUELINE P 8916 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001426 USCAGLIONE, ANTHONY & KATHY8463 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856287 USCHAAL, RICHARD DICKINSONFREDERICA LAURETTE SCHAAL 8387 PALACIO TERRACE SOUTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853206 USCHAEFER, MARY LOUISE8944 SAINT LUCIA DR #101NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000024 USCHANNA JR, ANTHONYJENNIFER A SCHANNA8261 LUCELLO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860642 USCHERZINGER, GREGORY AROBERTA P SCHERZINGER8106 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864240 USCHOOL DISTRICT-HACIENDA LAKES % SUPERINTENDENT5775 OSCEOLA TRLNAPLES, FL 34109---048586000104 USCHREINER, CRAIG S & JAMIA M8979 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001125 USCHULZE, JAMES C1005 SHADY LNNAPLES, FL 34120---000437240006 USCHWARTZ, MICHAEL STEVENSUE I SCHWARTZ8911 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001484 USCHWARTZMEYER, KEVIN8967 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003864 USCIOLINO, PAUL JOSEPHLYDIA M HUGHES8348 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347864541 USCOTT S TRAUTH LIVING TRUSTLINDA G TRAUTH LIVING TRUST 8075 W PROGRESS CIRCLELITTLETON, CO 80123---031347864567 USD SAN MARINO LLC2639 PROFESSIONAL CIRSUITE 101NAPLES, FL 34119---000412240005 USD SAN MARION LLC2639 PROFESSIONAL CIRSUITE 101NAPLES, FL 34119---000411800006 USEIDEN, CHARLOTTE9073 MONTSERRAT DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006201 USEIDEN, JOSELCHARLOTTE SEIDEN8951 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003783 USEOANES, RUBEN J & SUSAN8572 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851567 US-H NAPLES DEVELOPMENTPROPCO LLC% DISCOVERY MANAGEMENT GROUP27599 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD SUITE 201BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---073620100621 USHAFFER, SHERI L8221 LUCELLO TERRACE WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860846 USHAHROUDI, KAMRAN EFTEKHARI IMA YAGHOUBI RAD8958 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726004122 USHAPIRO, HARRIETT WENDYFRED STEVEN SHAPIRO9042 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---290522726006340 USHEARD, FRED & MAUREEN C7840 UMBERTO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904128048 USHELDRICK, MICHAEL & CAROL A 8514 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852469 USHIKOLUK, JEFFREY R & SUSAN C 8554 MAGGIORE COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851509 USHOCKLEY, JOHNROLFE P STANGE8922 SAINT LUCIA DR #102NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000202 USHORES REVOCABLE TRUST8356 LUCELLO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854247 USHUDER, GARY L & DARLA A9038 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006667 USIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTYOWNERS ASSN INC24600 S TAMIAMI TRL # 212BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---073620100634 USIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY INC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102FORT MYERS, FL 33907---568673620100029 USILBERG, STEVEN & CAROL A7915 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---269079904128323 USIMCO, DEBORAH C7927 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---71679904128381 USIMKIN, YAKOV V & GALINA B227 ESTATE COURTNORTHBROOK, IL 60062---031347851321 USLACK, MICHAEL KITZELLAUREN KRANAK SLACK3790 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374001267 USMITH, ALAN ROBERT & MONICA L 413 COMMONS WAYDOYLESTOWN, PA 18901---022726005309 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 640Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 9SMITH, MICHAEL ANTHONY MARISOL SMITH 8465 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855440 USMURIO, JACQUELYN KREULEDWARD LEONARD SMURIO JR 8389 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865663 USOBECK, MARK & MARY930 GENESEEROYAL OAK, MI 48073---031347852948 USOKOL, PAMELACHRISTOPHER JOHN MCGUCKIN8099 CALLE CANOVAS STNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863429 USOUTH NAPLES CITRUS GROVE LLC 341 SABAL PALM RDNAPLES, FL 34114---254900438400007 USOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOC OF THE 7TH DAY ADVENTIST1701 ROBIE AVEMONT DORA, FL 32757---000437200004 USPAVENTO, JOSEPH V & MAUREEN G8530 PALACIO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852540 USPINELLA, MARIA7907 VALENTINA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---269079904128284 USTABILE, MICHAEL JOHNPAMELA ANN STABILE8545 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855084 USTADT, ALAN D & FRANCES A7719 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268279904125203 USTASIAK, DAVID8064 CALLIE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863584 USTEFANO JR, DANIEL A & KARIE L 970 SWEET GRASS CIRCLEAURORA, OH 44202---022726001387 USTELLA M QUILBAN LIV TRUSTWILLIAM P QUILBAN LIV TRUST 7723 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268279904125229 USTELLACCI, RICHARD MICHAELJOANNE MARIE STELLACCI9015 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726005341 USTRAND-SZABO JOINT REV TRUST 8411 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853086 USTRATTON, HEATHER3616 SAPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374000268 USTRUNGS, GUNARS R & COLLEEN K8218 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865087 USUITER JOINT MARITAL TRUST8478 VIALE CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861764 USULLIVAN, PETER & KAREN9022 REDOND DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006706 USUNDIN, DEBRA LYNN8454 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856067 USUSAN A INANKUR LUND REV TRUST10985 1ST AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MN 55441---468726141000286 USUZANNE F WEBER TRUST8017 WILFREDO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---269479904129500 USUZANNE WARZON TRUSTGERALD MICHAEL WARZON TRUST 9011 REDONDA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726006968 USWAMP BUGGY DAY INCPO BOX 10528NAPLES, FL 34101---52800417240000 USWAMP BUGGY INCPO BOX 990010NAPLES, FL 34116---606000418400904 USWEENEY, WENDY & JAMES F8280 LUCELLO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853866 USZWAJKOWSKI, LEONARD8467 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852142 UT & S LEOPOLD JT REV LIV TRUST 8308 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854001 UTAYLOR MORRISON OF FL INC551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200SARASOTA, FL 34232---031347851046 UTEGEDER, NANCY772 BACK ROADROARING BRANCH, PA 17765---031347863885 UTEMPLETON, BARBARA JMICHAEL J TEMPLETON1301 27TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34117---422500415600008 UTERHUNE, THOMAS C7727 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268279904125245 UTERRELL, KAREN LCHRISTOPHER E TERRELL7608 THE COMMONSZIONSVILLE, IN 46077---022726003741 UTHIEL TRUST OF 19985896 EASTER LILY DRAPPLETON, WI 54915---022726003660 UTHOMAS III, JAY H & KRISTINE J68 PINEHURST AVEBILLERICA, MA 01821---022726004041 UTHOMAS R MANNO 2016 LIV TRUST 2619 BRECKENRIDGE LANENAPERVILLE, IL 60565---533600438240005 UTHOMAS, JANESUSAN HILTY3628 SAPPHIRE COVE CIRNAPLES, FL 34114---031374000323 UTHOMPSON, PAULETTE ACHARLES J DEAL III7718 TOMMASI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268179904126147 UTHURBER JR, CLIFFORD KINGSLEY LORRAINE THERESA THURBER7702 TOMMASI COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126228 UTHYSSEN, DAVID ARNOLDSUSAN LEE THYSSEN9019 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726005367 UTIERNAN FAMILY REV TRUST8301 LUCELLO TERRACE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853620 UTIITF /DEP-FORESTRYBELLE MEADE STATE FOREST 3900 COMMONWEALTH BLVDTALLAHASSEE, FL 32399---300000414040009 UTIITF /ST OF FL% DNR DOUGLAS BLDG3900 COMMONWEALTH BLVDTALLAHASSEE, FL 32399---300000414600009 UTIRPAK, MICHAEL J & PATRICIA8470 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855547 UTITOTA, DEBORAH AELIZABETH J DICK633 MOUNT VERNON RDSOUTHINGTON, CT 06489---031347853662 UTITUS, NANCY300 SABAL PALM RDNAPLES, FL 34114---254800434320000 UTMBMMB8287 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865388 UTOLENTINO, AURORA L8981 MUSTIQUE LNNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001808 UTOLL FL XIII LTD PARTNERSHIP250 GIBRALTAR ROADHORSHAM, PA 19044---022726000621 UTOMASSETTI, JASON8451 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856229 UTORO, ANTHONY J & PATRICIA G8408 VIALE CIRICENAPLES, FL 34114---031347861421 UTORRES FAMILY TRUST8584 MAGGIORE CTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851622 UTORRES, MARLENEGARY KEMP8544 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855848 UTOWNSEND, ROBERT R321 BRANDY LNNAPLES, FL 34114---257100438360008 UTRACT L DEVELOPMENT LLC7742 ALICO ROADFORT MYERS, FL 33912---000417760001 UTRACY, WILLIAM FERBERCAROL C TRACY8331 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853468 UTRANCHINI, JOSEPH V & CARLA J3209 SILER DRFINLEYVILLE, PA 15332---031347854140 UTRIJANOWSKI, LAWRENCEREBECCA TROJANOWSKI8493 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855301 UTRINITY ROSE TRUST20802 N GARYHAWK DR #1027SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255---022726002506 UTROISE, FRANK MVIRGINIA MEREDITH TROISE 8893 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---280922726002386 UTRUITT, JOSEPH WILLIAMBETTIE ANN TRUITT8886 SAINT LUCIA DRIVE #102NAPLES, FL 34114---026141000367 UTRUTE, RONALD M & JOAN L9008 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726009460 UTULLY, TIMOTHY J & MARIANNE T 17746 CRESTVIEW DRORLAND PARK, IL 60467---053269005466 UUMBERTO COURT LLC7558 GARIBALDI CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904126626 UURREA, SANDRA8101 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---269879904130324 UUS HOME CORPORATION10481 BEN C PRT6 ML CYPRS PKWYFORT MYERS, FL 33966---646000414360006 UVAJJHALA, RAVI & BHARATI8231 PROMOSO COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347865100 UVAN DYK, PAUL FRANCIS9082 MONTSERRAT DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726006544 UVANHULL PROPERTIES LLC54392 PELICAN LANESHELBY TOWNSHIP, MI 48315---031347852388 UVASKO, JOSEPH & JACKIE D8277 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347853743 UVERBECK FAMILY REV TRUST8497 SEVILLA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---281831347855288 UVERONAWALK COMM DEVEL DIST % SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES THE OAKS CENTER2501 BURNS RD STE APALM BEACH GARDE, FL 33410---520779904122549 UVERONAWALK HOMEOWNERS ASSO INC8090 SORRENTO LANE #1NAPLES, FL 34114---079904122523 UVINCENT, JOHN D & DIANE L8431 PALACIO TERRACE SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852980 UVIRGINIA CONDELLO REV TRUST6461 SANDALWOOD LANENAPLES, FL 34109---50300413680004 UVORBACH III, JOHN L & JOYCE K8477 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855385 UW BOLTINOFF REV LIV TRUST8940 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001303 UW M MCCORMACK REV TRUSTJO ANN KRIGER FAMILY TRUST 8458 PALACIO TERR WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852346 UWABBLE, RUDY LYNNSHARON ANN WABBLE8991 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726003961 UWALKER, PAUL AWILLIAM J RAY8549 PALACIO TERRACE NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347851787 UPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 641Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes 10WALL, MICHAEL G & DIANE6122 PLYMOUTH STDOWNERS GROVE, IL 60516---031347853345 UWALRATH REVOCABLE TRUST8905 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726002425 UWASCH, DIETMAR8257 LUCELLO TERRACE WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860668 UWATT, TIFFANY NICOLEWARREN CODY WATT8936 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001329 UWELINSKY, MATTHEW & MARILYN 102 POND SHORE DRCHARLESTOWN, RI 02813---079904126765 UWEYANT, GEORGE C & JOY A8402 PALACIO TER SNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852867 UWHALEN RAYMOND J & CATHERINE M 8982 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726004009 UWHITAKER, WILLIAM M & MAUREEN1513 WYNNEMOOR WAYFORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034---053269005440 UWHITE, DAVID E & JUDITH A303 MORGAN RDNAPLES, FL 34114---000436800502 UWHITLEY, RALPH W & BONNIE L8085 XENIA LNNAPLES, FL 34114---079904130243 UWIENDCZAK, CHRISTOPHERSUSAN J WIENDCZAK8528 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855767 UWILD, ERIC & LISA8213 LUCELLO TERRACE WESTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347860888 UWILLIAM P FEIG REV TRUST7800 UMBERTO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---268579904128242 UWILLIAMS, ALDON818 CLUBS DRBOURNE, TX 78006---000415760003 UWINKELMANN, KARL D & DONNA J 8443 VOLARO WAYNAPLES, FL 34114---031347856180 UWITTMAN REVOCABLE TRUST8487 PALACIO TER WNAPLES, FL 34114---031347852045 UWOLF, ELSA79 BRADFIELD DREAST AMHERST, NY 14051---031347861528 UWOLF, WILLIAM & MADELINE9102 MARMORA AVEMORTON GROVE, IL 60053---245100467320200 UWOLFE, DANIEL A & JUDITH N8978 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726004025 UWOLFSWINKEL, JULIA ANN8873 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726003408 UWOODLIFF LOVING TRUST8005 WILFREDO CTNAPLES, FL 34114---269479904129445 UWOOLSEY JR, KENNAIRD ECAROLE M WOOLSEY330 BETSINGER ROADSHERRILL, NY 13461---053269005521 UWROBLEWSKI, ERIC A8542 PALACIO TERRACENAPLES, FL 34114---031347852605 UYASHORIN, ROMAN & MARIANNA8509 SEVILLA COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347855220 UYAZINSKI, JOHN & NANCY403 BIBLE HILL ROADCLARMONT, NH 03743---031347865689 UYEN, JEFFREY H & HELENE H264 GARWIN RDSWEDESBORO, NJ 08085---373000438320006 UYOST II, WALTER MILTONDENISE CAROLINE GARGASZ-YOST 9020 SAINT LUCIA DRIVENAPLES, FL 34114---022726009402 UYOUNG, DEBRA L8320 LUCELLO TER NNAPLES, FL 34114---031347854069 UYOUNG, RICHARD KLEENA R DAS-YOUNG8773 SAINT LUCIA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726000809 UYU, MONY S8959 REDONDA DRNAPLES, FL 34114---022726001028 UZARZYCKI JR, WALTER G270 18TH ST NENAPLES, FL 34120---367000411040002 UZIMMERMAN, DAVID ROBERTMAUREEN ELIZABETH ZIMMERMAN7657 SICILIA CTNAPLES, FL 34114---079904124042 UZIMMERMANN, MARY & MARK J8953 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001662 UZIRZOW, JAMES EDWARDRENEE PAULINE ZIRZOW8012 CALLE CANOVAS COURTNAPLES, FL 34114---031347863843 UZSAMBOK, WILLIAM C & MARIA L8941 MUSTIQUE LANENAPLES, FL 34114---022726001604 UBONITA FLORES I LLC#1-35 TRILLIUM DRKITCHENER N2E 0H2 CANADA00418400302 FFERRIE FLORIDA TRUST39 HODGKINSON CRESCENTAURORA L4G 6K7 CANADA31347851884 FGAROFALO, TONYCAROL ELIZABETH GAROFALO CHEQUER TREE OASTSTANDARD LANEBETHERSDENKENT TN26 3JR UNITED KINGDOM22726001361 FGILLES BILODEAU LIVING TRUST3330 BOULEVARD LE CARREFOUR APARTMENT 1602LAVAL H7T 0B8 CANADA26141000244 FHANS MADER LIVING TRUSTYOLLANDE DUPERE LIV TRUST 1375 RUE DES BASSINS #501MONTREAL H3C 1W3 CANADA31347855822 FJOST, JUERGEN ANDREASSUSANNE JOHANNA JOSTIN TAESCHEN 871679ASPERG GERMANY79904126587 FLOISELLE, JEAN-PIERRENICOLE PLAMONDON517 KINDRED CRESCENTKEMPTVILLE KOG IJO CANADA31347851363 FMANGIONE, ANTHONY42 WOODHEATH LANESTOUFFVILLE L4A 2L7 CANADA22726002001 FMENGELE, HANS-PETER & ILONALYDTINSTRASSE 2BADEN BADEN D 76530 GERMANY53269005123 FMONFORTON, GREGORY JOHNHELEN AGNES MONFORTON 1101 DEERVIEW CRESCENTLASALLE N9J 0A7 CANADA31347853442 FOLDFIELD, ROBERT BRUCEJANE ELIZABETH OLDFIELD268 WELLINGTON STKINGSTON K7K 2Z1 CANADA31347854166 FPAQUETTE, PAMELAWILLIAM ANDREW KING118 JOHN WATT WAY #1THORNBURY N0H 2P0 CANADA53269005026 FPARFANE-MOORE, SUSANBRIAN WALTER ZEEDERBERG 74 SHERBROOKE WAYWORCESTER PARK KT488P UNITED KINGDOM 22726002409 FPONTONE, DANTE & LORILEE L154 LANDRY LNTHORNBURY N0H 2P0 CANADA22726001183 FSAMEL, MATTHIAS ERICHCHRISTINA MARIANNE SAMEL JOSEFINA ANNE GRET KARIN SAMEL OP DE LUST 42NOTTENSDORF 21640 GERMANY26141000260 FPOList_5009.A.2.cPacket Pg. 642Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 TIS WAIVER LETTER 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) September 24, 2021 Mr. Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning Section Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Project Name: Isles of Naples Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Subject: TIS Waiver Request Dear Mr. Sawyer, Please accept this letter as the required Transportation Impact Statement Waiver for the proposed PUD Amendment application for the above referenced project. This letter is being provided pursuant to the pre-application meeting notes provided by Mike Sawyer, and comments received during the meeting on August 10, 2021. The proposed project is a residential development within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The PUD Amendment proposes amendments to design standards, modifications to potential interconnections modifications to the boundaries of the Business Park and Residential tracts in the PUDs “North Area.” No changes to the previously approved trips or uses are proposed as a part of this application. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (239) 850 - 8525, or Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, LLC Alexis Crespo, AICP Senior Vice President – Planning 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 name not yet approved T50, R26, S14 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)PUD Insubstantial Change See attached. 48586001022 Hacienda Lakes - North Area Isles of Naples COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 07/14/2021 48586001022 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment)n Waldrop Engineering, P.A. (239) 908-3405 alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com 7/13/2021 Print Map https://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=Isles of Naples&orient=PORTRAIT&paper=LETTER&minX=430441.252397193&minY=646…1/1 Isles of Naples Folio Number: 48586001022 Name: HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC Street# & Name: 3591 THE LORDS WAY Build# / Unit#: FD-2 / 1 Legal Description: HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT FD-2, LESS R/W AS DESC IN OR 5201 PG 2151, LESS OR 5456 PG 1683, LESS THAT PART 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-dateinformation, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) Print Tax Bills Change of Address $ 18,400,900 $ 0 $ 18,400,900 $ 18,400,900 $ 18,400,900 $ 18,400,900 Parcel No 48586001022 Site Address*Disclaimer 3591 THELORDS WAY Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34114 Name / Address HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD City FORT MYERS State FL Zip 33912 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 5B14 393420FD-2 15B14 14 50 26 221.59 Legal HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT FD-2, LESS R/W AS DESC IN OR 5201 PG 2151, LESS OR5456 PG 1683, LESS THAT PART OF TR FD-2 LYING WEST OF THE LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELSHOWN ON PLAT OF HACIENDA LAKES THAT IS ALSO AN ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTAND LOCATED WITHIN THE HACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVEL- OPMENT DISTRICT Millage Area 39 Millage Rates   *Calculations Sub./Condo 393420 - HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES PHASE II School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.016 6.2924 11.3084 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount  2020 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll   Property Summary Property Detail Sketches Trim Notices 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) June 2, 2021 VIA: E-MAIL Brandon Hadlock Brandon.Hadlock@waldropengineering.com Waldrop Engineering 28100 Bonita Grande Drive – Suite 305 Bonita Springs, Florida, 34135 Subject: Water and Wastewater Service Availability Project: Isles of Naples Parcel #: 48586001022 Dear Brandon: The subject project is in the service areas of the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s (CCWSD) regional WTP and South County WRF. Connections to the CCWSD’s water and wastewater transmission systems may be permitted only in the locations referenced herein, or in a superseding utility service availability letter, and only after the GMD Development Review Division’s approval of hydraulic calculations prepared by the Developer’s Engineer of Record in accordance with the Design Criteria found in Section 1 of the Collier County Water-Sewer District Utilities Standards Manual. Adequate capacity for this project is not guaranteed until the project receives a commitment for service. Water service is readily available to the project via an existing 36” water main located along the east side of the Henderson Canal. However, this main consists of fusible PVC pipe, which requires a special process to tap without causing a catastrophic main break. The construction plans must require coordination with the Water Distribution Section. Otherwise, a 20” water main beneath the southbound lanes of Collier Boulevard is also available for service connection but would be difficult to access. Potable water source pressure shall be verified by the results of a fire flow test not older than six months, in accordance with subsection 2.2.1, paragraph A. Unless served by a master meter, the project shall include two independent connections to the water distribution system or a stub-out for future development at an approved location, as required per subsection 2.2.2 of the Design Criteria. Potable water is available for domestic use, fire protection, and irrigation, subject to the provisions of LDC 4.03.08 C, the Collier County Irrigation Ordinance (2015-27), and other applicable rules and regulations. Wastewater service is readily available to the project via an existing 12” force main beneath the southbound lanes of Collier Boulevard, along the west side of the median. Please contact the Wastewater Engineering Section (WasteWaterEngineering@colliercountyfl.gov) to confirm downstream wastewater transmission system capacity and force main connection pressure. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) See the attached GIS screen shots for approximate existing utility locations. Record drawings for CCWSD utility infrastructure within County right-of-way can be requested by emailing Bryan Feir (Bryan.Feir@colliercountyfl.gov). A preliminary utility plan must be reviewed and discussed at a pre-submittal conference with representatives of the Public Utilities Department and the Growth Management Department, as required by Sec. 134-58, paragraph (b)(2) of the Code of Ordinances. This conference may be conducted by email at the discretion of the Public Utilities Department. Please contact Brett Rosenblum (Brett.Rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov) for assistance with this requirement. If you have any questions, you may contact me at (239) 252-1037 or Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E., Principal Project Manager CC: Steve Messner, Division Director, PUD/WD; Beth Johnssen, Division Director, PUD/WWD; Ben Bullert, Principal Project Manager – Water, PUD/EPMD; Dan Roman, Principal Project Manager – Wastewater, PUD/EPMD; Brett Rosenblum, Principal Project Manager, GMD/DRD; Joanna Nicholson, Site Plans Reviewer, GMD/DRD; Utility Planning Section 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) GIS Screen Shot 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 677Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 7/15/2021 Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=HACIENDALAK…1/2 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC Filing Information L09000067527 27-0590435 07/14/2009 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Changed: 01/27/2014 Mailing Address 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Changed: 01/27/2014 Registered Agent Name & Address TORRES, DAVID E 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Name Changed: 02/03/2012 Address Changed: 01/27/2014 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR TORRES, DAVID E 7742 Alico Rd Ft Myers, FL 33912 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date D . C 7/15/2021 Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=HACIENDALAK…2/2 2019 01/31/2019 2020 01/17/2020 2021 02/11/2021 Document Images 02/11/2021 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/17/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/31/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/19/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/24/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/27/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/13/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/02/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/14/2009 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 684Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9/14/21, 8:49 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLFLXIII A14…1/2 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Partnership TOLL FL XIII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Filing Information A14000000715 47-2556249 12/16/2014 FL ACTIVE LP AMENDMENT 11/13/2017 11/22/2017 Principal Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 05/01/2021 Mailing Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE ATTN: LEGAL DEPT. FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 05/01/2021 Registered Agent Name & Address UNITED AGENT GROUP INC. 801 US HIGHWAY 1 NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 33408 Address Changed: 02/05/2020 General Partner Detail Name & Address Document Number P94000082800 TOLL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY, INC. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 D . C 9/14/21, 8:49 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLFLXIII A14…2/2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2019 04/27/2019 2020 05/11/2020 2021 05/01/2021 Document Images 05/01/2021 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/11/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/27/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 09/17/2018 -- Reg. Agent Change View image in PDF format 04/27/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/13/2017 -- LP Amendment View image in PDF format 04/28/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/18/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 12/16/2014 -- Domestic LP View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…1/5 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation TOLL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY, INC. Filing Information F06000001412 57-1195213 03/06/2006 DE ACTIVE CORPORATE MERGER 10/31/2019 NONE Principal Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 01/14/2021 Mailing Address 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Changed: 01/14/2021 Registered Agent Name & Address UNITED AGENT GROUP INC. 801 US HIGHWAY 1 NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 33408 Name Changed: 09/13/2018 Address Changed: 02/05/2020 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title Director, Senior VP & CFO CONNOR, MARTIN P 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 D . C 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…2/5 Title Senior VP & CAO Grubb, Michael J 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Director, CEO & President Yearley, Douglas C., Jr. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Vice President & Secretary Coen, Kevin J. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Executive VP & COO Parahus, Robert 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Group President Netro, Gregory S. 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title Senior VP Barnes, Donald R. 3970 West Indiantown Road Jupiter, FL 33478 Title Division President Pfister, Fredrick W. 951 Broken Sound Parkway Suite 180 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Title Division President Merten, Steven R. 160 Cape May Avenue Ponte Vedra, FL 32081 Title Division President 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…3/5 Fanning, Brock O. 2966 Commerce Park Drive Suite 100 Orlando, FL 32819 Title Senior VP & Treasurer Ziegler, Gregg L. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP & Assistant Secretary Greenspan, Kenneth J. 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Rothaus, Stacey A 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Brumfield, Steven 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title Regional President Murray, Thomas J. 2557 SW Grapevine Parkway Suite 100 Grapevine, TX 76051 Title Division President Ryan, Christopher J. 9950 Princess Palm Drive Suite 330 Tampa, FL 33619 Title Division Vice President Olive, Matthew 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title Division Vice President 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…4/5 Beidle, Nathan 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title VP Moore, Stacia 40 Everest Lane Suite 5 Saint Johns, FL 32259 Title VP Rodriguez, Yolanda S. 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 Title Assistant Vice President Smith, III, Thomas J. 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 Title Division VP O'Hara, Brian 2966 COMMERCE PARK DRIVE SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FL 32819 Title Senior VP, General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer Hoban, Timothy J 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Smith, David 1140 VIRGINIA DRIVE FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 Title VP Gold, Benjamin 725 TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD SUITE 200 ORANGE, CA 92868 Annual Reports 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9/14/21, 8:51 AM Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TOLLSOUTHEA…5/5 Report Year Filed Date 2019 02/27/2019 2020 02/13/2020 2021 01/14/2021 Document Images 01/14/2021 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/13/2020 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 10/31/2019 -- Merger View image in PDF format 02/27/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 09/13/2018 -- Reg. Agent Change View image in PDF format 03/16/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/02/2017 -- Merger View image in PDF format 10/30/2017 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/01/2016 -- Merger View image in PDF format 04/29/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/30/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/29/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/01/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/07/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/23/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/26/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/14/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 06/04/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/06/2006 -- Foreign Profit View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 BOUNDARY SURVEY 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 693Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 694Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PUDA PL20210001791 WARRANTY DEED 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Hacienda Lakes MPUD - CCPC Hearing Packet (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : PL20210001791 - Hacienda Lakes North Area MPUD Amendment) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 : 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Signed Sign Affidavit - Hacienda Lakes PUDA-DOA (21785 :