Loading...
Backup Documents 04/12/2022 Item # 7 .,I" ♦ ft a 0 = z fn,) co D W 57 OImw - \ O OCI J z a. `9 J � � Z W W J CD 2 l'i'l' Qmo U/) zLi j> Z aj = w0 w a ce c 0 O O W 5zzw cno LIJ w c) Q W Y W CCfz O ( 1 L Q I- w Q 0- D Q w ce co al 1 4, F- J .V d O N � z_ a wJ Q v Z � z z o QI- o 0 W a L o ~ m 1•- : 0 W c� zW Z m ( O w W n •. z cn D � J W 0 z CD-o Q y cto < U 00 = O _ F- p �F U- H A . U Z W OI- i/ cW w J c) W H- O c[ 2 m N Q � w 00 1- 'V^^ L Q Q U W � O W i. I L M U' = 4— i coH C1 Q LL ZH = OZ M 1- = Z LL Y Z Q No - wE m O m � acci) W ow 0LI- .� zz0 W Wz 0 r1 N .V zz_ � 2 LU H (J DOS co LU ~ zw W J .� OZZ O 02 M 0 (U Zw0 f� zw O Z 0Wcn W Z V OU O H z w W E S= W 0 - w CO U VVV ___ o Wmo � � Q CD `a( .F.� J U w J .a O J W O = d MINIM r 1 a U = UI- \J U co _ U ct Q m ai c CI 0 C CO a ''' Z 1r "1 ce = z_ 0 `'N m OU z F- 0 2 J �, COww !- zO Q C � D J z � w J D Z w w J ! C< 2 . .._k m o W z > Z Q U) � � ow a v ct CD 0 0 � O w z ° p r ti J 0 � � a Cw co I— w a /'\ oLN ¢ om J nmoo� F- J O "' ~ z Q w — Q t? a- �0 ¢ Io vo E _ om - -iO Nzw Z mix 0 = LU 2 w D a F.. ■Q o z m Q O cw J O O 0 Q w LU n -� � � Q V 00 = J O J m 0 1-- 0 E E �` mz = O ao 0 o w Lu CD 0 J omzw u) w= O F-in > c u_ u_ < o ¢ mow 0 H- .3 a d QUQU W o w 0-i 0 = I— ct U I=- CD Q Li) zI- = 0z c° } = Z wY Z CD o m I- Q 0 O Q C M m w JH 0 J ,' _ M O wz � O \ \ zzC7 w of 0 z 0 1 \` Qz = _ 90 F- t (5 ClI z 11J w J 0 z 0 0 0 M O z ' 0 Zw O Z 3 octN w - z " N 02 l= z � w E c � w � M wm U �` o wmo � C_ Q CD :0) J __I U J w J 0 ca CT W N a' m H Ce ---A Ce Ci ` = z i- z W i- i CO z Q p IX � O J z o p... W - c Z ww -I ¢ mO Zw Z (1 ji cowCe f == -' a = C-D0 G O w 14. i 0u) IY Q0 w a 1 cC = 0 0 ¢ � J ` +ro I- i- _I C O w - NoFz a� a oo � CI � zCi 411, ¢ moo zQOp WJ L CC vI _ _ ¢ 0 I- , mJi o F- I Ow ■� n`y NZW Z R a_CO Et O V l 1- 0 I- W L._ �~i ■— •a Z0=0E- ZJ W w Qo z & m O Ocn J O I- u. LLI Nib moo ¢ U Oo = ._ •9 oDm c ocn H d } E oz = O � 0 O Wcoa� U \f F _j ZY w c.) w1 0 =� ¢ ~ cra � O HRS 2 w = IY W7.3 n d � UU ¢ ¢ W p == fC -0 r CD - U F- � aL9ZI- = O z oM = ZIL Y Z cm p m H ¢ U Q O m w ~ m JO J IZi w rvo i zH. O U W of Qzww oz 0 _i__ Q z � o w =r U l"= zw �u WI- 0 Z0 O m Z J 0wWZ w w cn mZ0Z --� 0col': O I"'" Z = w E c c ct It, w co O owmo I:t a U ...I 2 _ J a) _ , 4_, JJ�� p = OHa t. 00 Ce C d a) m Q m -o ocl- C o a) >- a) N Q M z Ce Q 0 = z U U' �. f- W moi_ H o � J OLL. w �"' Q0 Q J 0 J Z a_ W Joy Z � = _J F- Ow Cl) 0w I- = W W Cl) W < Z 1C0o o � o w z U Cl)0 co a "' Ex Q wY W LLI tea ¢ I w ¢ o- 1 a) NQu) W wm I { O N � � Q z � � ooz 2 � zw � Z Fz Q I_ Q O W -----S 8 < O 0 F- I \ oF- m I--.' JO Li- CV 0 W Z m W' O C) ij " U 5 I- M a LL U- .� 0 l z co Q OLU ii. / I 0 o O 0 y ono U wp = ~ ao m = a LIJ O z = O 0 1- oJ p LLB�w O m*.r 0 z f- Piw iim o WH 0 Q2< O Q CQ U) > j W w O 1-- a d U O UW s QQw LLI 0 = • .• w Q mO2 I � O I-- CD Lc) zF.. = 0z " 4 o m F- Z < 0 O Q 0 _ L" ~ wZI- F- O 0 < W W pQ U- \n zzc� o0 w l ► 4 oz � = wu) I- CC C5 W I— z w W l J ( ' ') ›- ° W O I— U) M o z w 0 H O W O O �' al CT) U) z U Z �� U O 0 6 � I_' � w � wm UW O Woo0 Ct Q cp _1 '2 -_Ti 0 .J W •II--+ 1 ' 0 Q W 0 a. U w as t Q m Eno 6 +' O w c 0 d >' Cl) a) � a) 0 T E o_ Q m Z cc Item #7 Public Comments on General Topics not on the Current or Future Agenda — Speaker backup docs v�'�'`�~1�`'v World Health � � Organization SEVENTY-FIFTH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY A75/18 Provisional agenda item 16.2 12 April 2022 Strengthening WHO preparedness for and response to health emergencies Proposal for amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) 1. The Director-General has the honour to submit to the Health Assembly for its consideration, in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations(2005), the proposal for amendments to the Regulations received from the United States of America pursuant to the said provision(see Annex). 2. In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 55 of the International I-Iealth Regulations(2005),the Director-General communicated the text of the proposal for amendments to all States Parties to the Regulations on 20 January 2022 via circular letter. 3. Pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005), any amendments to the Regulations adopted by the Health Assembly would come into force for all States Parties on the same terms,and subject to the same rights and obligations,as provided for in Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO and Articles 59 to 64 of the International Health Regulations(2005). ACTION BY THE HEALTH ASSEMBLY 4. The I Icalth Assembly is invited to consider the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations(2005). A75/18 ANNEX (64.4,,I,World Health Organization 20,AVENUE APPIA-cH.1211 GENEVA 27-SVATZE4Wno-Ta MIMI..N2279I211l-rMoanPM Nt22 791 3111-mwVRAD.,r Ref.:C.I..2.2022 Proposal for amendments to the International llealth Regulations(2005) The Director-General of the World Health Organization presents his compliments to States Parties to the International Health Regulations(2005)((AIR(2005))and has the honour to transmit the text of the proposal for amendments of the IHR(2005)received from the United States of America pursuant to paragraph I of Article 55 of the IHR(2005). In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 55 of the Il-IR(2005),this letter constitutes a formal communication of the text of the amendments proposed by the United States of America. The Director-General of the World Iieahh Organization takes this opportunity to renew to States Parties to the II IR(2005)the assurance of his highest consideration. GENEVA,20 January 2022 IiNCLS.:(2) d.oJWl;L,r.a11:a lliw• Organisation mondiale de la Sante•Bceri*pHas opra*M9aurss 3,opanamtpaMe ols-Organization Mundial de la Salud Annex A75/18 „, PC'+41ANl Nr M'al,'r1 i. • f U "7 P't A rif A1.11 It,t A �, I.t♦ 4At��,,',AN 1 rl U t+ 'NTt R P4A';CSNPA Oflt..AN lwrl"1N'. ,1.{Nt.♦'A No.4-22 The Permanent Mission of the l tnited States of America to the United Nations Office and Other International Organizations in Geneva presents its compliments to the World Health Organization(W11O1 and refers to the International Health Regulations(IHR I(2005). In accordance cc ith Ankle 55111 of the II IR(2005),the United States of America is proposing amendments to the II IR(2005). The Mission,by means ot'this note,and in accordance with Article 55(2)of the 11IR(2005).respectfully requests the Director-General of the WI 10 to communicate the text of the attached proposed IHR amendments to all States Parties at least four months before the Seventy-fifth World Health Assemble. We are also transmitting via this note a letter to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebrevesus from the Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs of the United States Department of I lealth and human Srn ices.Loyce Pace,reiterating the critical importance of strengthening the M IR 120051 along with other efforts to strengthen the ability of the Wi 10 and Member States to prevent,detect,and respond to future public health emergencies of international concern. 3 A75/18 Annex The Permanent Mission of the United States of America avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the WHO the assurances of its highest consideration. Enclosed: 1. Letter from HHS Assistant Secretary Loyce Pace 2. Proposed IHR amendments Geneva, 18 January 2022 World I lealth Organization 4 Annex A75/18 Submission of the United States of America Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations(2005) Articles 5,6,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18,48,49,53,59 Explanation of changes: The proposed new text is shown in bold underline,and proposed deletions to existing text is shown in stfikethrough.All other text would remain unchanged. Article 5:Surveillance 1. Each State Party shall develop,strengthen and maintain,as soon as possible but no later than five years from the entry into force of these Regulations for that State Party, the capacity to detect,assess, notify and report events in accordance with these Regulations,as specified in Annex 1. This capacity will be periodically reviewed through the Universal Health Periodic Review mechanism. Should such review identify resource constraints and other challenges in attaining these capacities,WHO and its Regional Offices shall, upon the request of a State Party, provide or facilitate technical support and assist in mobilization of financial resources to develop,strengthen and maintain such capacities. New 5. WHO shall develop early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national,regional,or global risk posed by an event of unknown causes or sources and shall convey this risk assessment to States Parties in accordance with Articles 11 and 45 where appropriate. The risk assessment shall indicate, based on the best available knowledge, the level of risk of potential spread and risks of potential serious public health impacts, based on assessed infectiousness and severity of the illness. Article 6:Notification 1. Each State Party shall assess events occurring within its territory by using the decision instrument in Annex 2 within 48 hours of the National IHR Focal Point receiving the relevant information. Each State Party shall notify WHO,by the most efficient means of communication available,by way of the National IHR Focal Point, and within 24 hours of assessment of public health information, of all events which may constitute a public health emergency of international concern within its territory in accordance with the decision instrument, as well as any health measure implemented in response to those events. If the notification received by WHO involves the competency of the International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA), the Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO), the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) or other relevant entities, WHO shall immediately notify the IAEA relevant entities. 2. Following a notification, a State Party shall continue to communicate to WHO, by the most efficient means of communication available, timely, accurate and sufficiently detailed public health information available to it on the notified event,where possible including genetic sequence data,case definitions, laboratory results, source and type of the risk, number of cases and deaths, conditions affecting the spread of the disease and the health measures employed;and report,when necessary,the difficulties faced and support needed in responding to the potential public health emergency of international concern. 5 A75/18 Annex Article 9: Other reports 1. WHO may take into account reports from sources other than notifications or consultations and shall assess these reports according to established epidemiological principles and then communicate information on the event to the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring.Belem forth in Article 10.To this end,WHO shall make the information received available to the States Parties and only where it is duly justified may WHO maintain the confidentiality of the source.This information will be used in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 11. Article 10: Verification 1. Within 24 hours of receiving information, WHO shall request, in aceerdance wit p icle 9, verification from a State Party of reports from sources other than notifications or consultations of events which may constitute a public health emergency of international concern allegedly occurring in the State's territory. In such cases, WHO shall inform the State Party concerned regarding the reports it is seeking to verify. 2. Pursuant to the foregoing paragraph and to Article 9.,each State Party,when requested by WHO, shall verify and provide: (a) within 24 hours,an initial reply to,or acknowledgement of,the request from WHO; (b) within 24 hours, available public health information on the status of events referred to in WHO's request;and (c) information to WHO in the context of an assessment under Article 6, including relevant information as described in paragraphs 1 and 2 of that Article. 3. When WHO receives information of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern, it shall offer within 24 hours to collaborate with the State Party concerned in assessing the potential for international disease spread, possible interference with international traffic and the adequacy of control measures. Such activities may include collaboration with other standard- setting organizations and the offer to mobilize international assistance in order to support the national authorities in conducting and coordinating on-site assessments. 3bis. Within 24 hours of receiving a WHO offer of collaboration, the State Party may request additional information supporting the offer. WHO shall provide such information within 24 hours. When 48 hours have elapsed since the initial WHO offer of collaboration, failure by the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration shall constitute rejection for the purposes of sharing available information with States Parties under Paragraph 4 of this section. 4. If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours,WHO shall may, when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it,whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WH . 6 Annex A75/18 Article 11:Provision of information by WHO 1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article,WHO shall send to all States Parties and,as appropriate,to relevant intergovernmental organizations,as soon as possible and by the most efficient means available, in confidence,such public health information which it has received under Articles 5 to 10 inclusive or which is available in the public domain,and which is necessary to enable States Parties to respond to a public health risk. WHO shall communicate information to other States Parties that might help them in preventing the occurrence of similar incidents. 2. WHO shall use information received under Articles 6, and 8 and 9 for verification, assessment and assistance purposes under these Regulations and,unless otherwise agreed with the States Parties referred to in those provisions,shall net make this information generally available to other States Parties,when until ch limo a . (a) the event is determined to constitute a public health emergency of international concern in accordance with Article 12;or (b) information evidencing the international spread of the infection or contamination has been confirmed by WHO in accordance with established epidemiological principles;or (c) there is evidence that: (i) control measures against the international spread are unlikely to succeed because of the nature of the contamination,disease agent,vector or reservoir;or (ii) the State Party lacks sufficient operational capacity to carry out necessary measures to prevent further spread of disease;or (d) the nature and scope of the international movement of travellers, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods or postal parcels that may be affected by the infection or contamination requires the immediate application of international control measures;or (e) WHO determines it is necessary that such information be made available to other States Parties to make informed,timely risk assessments. 3. WHO shall inform the State Party in whose territory the event is occurring as to its intent to make information available under this Article. 4. When information received by WHO under paragraph 2 of this Article is made available to States Parties in accordance with these Regulations, WHO shall make it available to the public if other information about the same event has already become publicly available and there is a need for the dissemination of authoritative and independent information. New 5. WHO shall annually report to the Health Assembly on all activities under this Article, including instances of sharing information that has not been verified by a State Party on whose territory an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern is or is allegedly occurring with States Parties through alert systems. 7 A75/18 Annex Article 12:Determination of a public health emergency of international concern,public health emergencv of regional concern,or intermediate health alert 1. The Director-General shall determine,on the basis of information received,in particular from the State Party within whose territory an event is occurring, whether an event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern in accordance with the criteria and the procedure set out in these Regulations. 2. If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring,the Director-General shall notify all States Parties and seek to consult with the State Party in whose territory the event arises regarding this preliminary determination and may, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the Committee established under Article 48 (hereinafter the "Emergency Committee"). If the Director-General determines that the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern,the Director-General shall, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the Committee e:tablished under Article A8 (hereinafter the "Emergency Committee") on appropriate temporary recommendations. 3. Tf f llowing the., „ltation ph 7 ..{.oye the Director Ge er..l ..n tL e State Party ,.rddance with tl,e p cedure set f rth i.. Article 19 ' 4. In determining whether an event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, the Director-General shall consider: (a) Information provided by the State Party,by other States Parties,available in the public domain,or otherwise available under Articles 5-10; (b) The decision instrument contained in Annex 2; (c) The advice of the Emergency Committee; (d) Scientific principles as well as available scientific evidence and other relevant information; and (e) An assessment of the risk to human health,of the risk of international spread of disease and of the risk of interference with international traffic. 5. If the Director-General,following consultations with the Emergency Committee and relevant States Parties wxthc ixih ooe territvrTtho iubxic liealuh a merbency-of internat' , considers that a public health emergency of international concern has ended,the Director-General shall take a decision in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 49. New 6.Where an event has not been determined to meet the criteria for a public health emergency of international concern but the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response, the Director- General,on the basis of information received,may determine at any time to issue an intermediate 8 Annex A75/18 public health alert to States Parties and may consul( the Emergence Committee in a manner consistent with the procedure set out in Article 49. New 7.A Regional Director may determine that an event constitutes a public health emergency of regional concern and provide related guidance to States Parties in the region either before or after notification of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern is made to the Director-General,who shall inform all States Parties. Article 13:Public health response 3. ,WHO shall offer assistance collaborate to a State Party in the response to public health risks and other events by providing technical guidance and assistance and by assessing the effectiveness of the control measures in place, including the mobilization of international teams of experts for on-site assistance, when necessary. The State Party shall accept or reject such an offer of assistance within 48 hours and,in the case of rejection of such an offer,shall provide to WHO its rationale for the rejection,which WHO shall share with other States Parties. 4. If WHO, in consultation with the States Parties concerned as provided in Article 12, determines that a public health emergency of international concern is occurring, it shall may offer, in addition to the support indicated in paragraph 3 of this Article, further assistance to the State Party, including an assessment of the severity of the international risk and the adequacy of control measures. Such collaboration may include the offer to mobilize international assistance in order to support the national authorities in conducting and coordinating on-site assessments. When requested by the State Party, WHO shall provide information supporting such an offer.The State Party shall accept or reject such an offer of assistance within 48 hours and,in the case of rejection of such an offer, shall provide to WHO its rationale for the rejection, which WHO shall share with other States Parties. Regarding on-site assessments, in compliance with its national law, a State Party shall make reasonable efforts to facilitate short-term access to relevant sites; in the event of a denial, it shall provide its rationale for the denial of access. Article 15: Temporary recommendations 2. Temporary recommendations may include the deployment of expert teams,as well as health measures to be implemented by the State Party experiencing the public health emergency of international concern,or by other States Parties,regarding persons,baggage,cargo,containers,conveyances,goods and/or postal parcels to prevent or reduce the international spread of disease and avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic. Article 18:Recommendations with respect to persons,baggage,cargo,containers, conveyances, goods and postal parcels New 3. In developing temporary recommendations, the Director-General shall consult with relevant international agencies such as ICAO, IMO and WTO in order to avoid unnecessary interference with international travel and trade, as appropriate. Additionally, temporary recommendations should allow for the appropriate exemption of essential health care workers and essential medical products and supplies from travel and fade restrictions. 9 A75/18 Annex New 4: In implementing health measures pursuant to these Regulations, including Article 43, States Parties shall make reasonable efforts, taking into account relevant international law, to ensure that: (a) Contingency plans are in place to ensure that health care worker movement and supply chains are facilitated in a public health emergency of international concern; (b) Travel restrictions do not unduly prevent the movement of health care workers necessary for public health responses; (c) Trade restrictions make provision to protect supply chains for the manufacture and transport of essential medical products and supplies; and (d) The repatriation of travellers is addressed in a timely manner,given evidence-based measures to prevent the spread of diseases. Article 48: Terms of reference and composition 2. The Emergency Committee shall be composed of experts selected by the Director-General from the IHR Expert Roster and,when appropriate,other expert advisory panels of the Organization,as well, as Regional Directors from any impacted region.The Director-General shall determine the duration of membership with a view to ensuring its continuity in the consideration of a specific event and its consequences.The Director-General shall select the members of the Emergency Committee on the basis of the expertise and experience required for any particular session and with due regard to the principles of equitable age,gender,and geographical representation,and require training in these Regulations before participation. t least„ne member Members of the Emergency Committee should include he an at least one expert nominated by a the State Party within whose territory the event arises,as well as experts nominated by other affected States Parties. For the purposes of Articles 48 and 49, an "affected State Party" refers to a State Party either geographically proximate or otherwise impacted by the event in question. Article 49: Procedure 3 bis.If the Emergency Committee is not unanimous in its findings,any member shall be entitled to express his or her dissenting professional views in an individual or group report,which shall state the reasons why a divergent opinion is held and shall form part of the Emergency Committee's report. 3 ter.The composition of the Emergency Committee and its complete reports shall be shared with Member States. 4. The Director-General shall invite affected States Parties, including the State Party in whose territory the event arises,to present its their views to the Emergency Committee. To that effect, the Director-General shall notify States Parties of to-it the dates and the agenda of the meeting of the Emergency Committee with as much advance notice as necessary.The State Party in whose territory the event arises , may not seek a postponement of the meeting of the Emergency Committee for the purpose of presenting its views thereto. 10 Annex A75/I8 7. Affected States Parties i •ho:e territories`he^ nt h^:' rred may propose to the Director- General the termination of a public health emergency of international concern and/or the temporary recommendations,and may make a presentation to that effect to the Emergency Committee. New Chapter IV(Article 53 bis-quater): The Compliance Committee 53 his Terms of reference and composition 1. The State Parties shall establish a Compliance Committee that shall be responsible for: (a) Considering information submitted to it by WHO and States Parties relating to compliance with obligations under these Regulations; (b) Monitoring, advising on, and/or facilitating assistance on matters relating to compliance with a view to assisting States Parties to comply with obligations under these Regulations; (c) Promoting compliance by addressing concerns raised by States Parties regarding implementation of,and compliance with,obligations under these Regulations; and (d) Submitting an annual report to each Health Assembly describing: (i) The work of the Compliance Committee during the reporting period; (ii) The concerns regarding non-compliance during the reporting period; and (iii) Any conclusions and recommendations of the Committee. 2. The Compliance Committee shall be authorized to: (a) Request further information on matters under its consideration; (b) Undertake,with the consent of any State Party concerned,information gathering in the territory of that State Party; (c) Consider any relevant information submitted to it; (d) Seek the services of experts and advisers, including representatives of NGOs or members of the public,as appropriate;and (e) Make recommendations to a State Party concerned and/or WHO regarding how the State Party may improve compliance and any recommended technical assistance and financial support. 3. The Members of the Compliance Committee shall be appointed by States Parties from each Region,comprising six government experts from each Region.The Compliance Committee shall be appointed for four-year terms and meet three times per year. 53 ter. Conduct of business 1. The Compliance Committee shall strive to make its recommendations on the basis of consensus. // A 75/18 Annex 2. The Compliance Committee may request the Director-General to invite representatives of the United Nations and its specialized agencies and other relevant intergovernmental organizations or nongovernmental organizations in official relations with WHO to designate representatives to attend the Committee sessions, where appropriate to address a specific issue under consideration.Such representatives,with the consent of the Chairperson,make statements on the subjects under discussion. 53 quater Reports 1. For each session, the Compliance Committee shall prepare a report setting forth the Committee's views and advice. This report shall be approved by the Compliance Committee before the end of the session. Its views and advice shall not commit WHO,States Parties,or other entities and shall be formulated as advice to the relevant State Party. 2. If the Compliance Committee is not unanimous in its findings,any member shall be entitled to express his or her dissenting professional views in an individual or group report,which shall state the reasons why a divergent opinion is held and shall form part of the Committee's report. 3. The Compliance Committee's report shall be submitted to all States Parties and to the Director-General, who shall submit reports and advice of the Compliance Committee, to the Health Assembly or the Executive Board, as well as any relevant committees,for consideration, as appropriate. Article 59:Entry into force;period fcnr rejection or reservations I. The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, these Regulations , shall be 18 months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of these Regulations Regulations by the Health Assembly.Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no effect. 1 bis.The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, an amendment to these Regulations shall be six months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly. Any resection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no etTect. 2. These Regulations shall enter into force 24 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and amendments to these Regulations shall enter into force six months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph ibis of this Article,except for: (a) a State that has rejected these Regulations or an amendment thereto in accordance with Article 61; (b) a State that has made a reservation, for which these Regulations shall enter into force as provided in Article 62; (c) a State that becomes a Member of WHO after the date of the notification by the Director- General referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and which is not already a party to these Regulations,for which these Regulations shall enter into force as provided in Article 60;and 12 Annex A75/18 (d) a State not a Member of WI1O that accepts these Regulations, for which they shall enter into force in accordance with paragraph I of Article 64. 3. If a State is not able to adjust its domestic legislative and administrative arrangements fully with these Regulations or amendments thereto within the periods set out in paragraph 2 of this Article,as applicable,that State shall submit within the period specified in paragraph 1 of this Article a declaration to the Director-General regarding the outstanding adjustments and achieve them no later than 12 months after the entry into force of these Regulations or the amendments thereto for that State Party. 13 201&OBAMAS AMERICA OINFSH 0SOU7l. 2000 fmtALES I 0 A,. 2000 Mules By Dinesh D-Souza Silverspot Cinema 9118 Strada Place Suite 8205, Naples, Florida Tuesday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Wednesday - 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Thursday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State Y tj2L 0:r N 1N 1 Xt•-4 k1J 1 (4.1 L- ('o(/,e,_ (�' C.� dr -es-ad- , ( D 1410 i ib er- 11 AIM La / _ .2 - t, 1J9 2 L� . EL sP��eDU�n ' � C& ( Ar. , C. 1 'a . . it ' •,'Clb 11 a 1311WWWww.-.441111 II 11111M ( AA �_-_r�'i� Vol- -7`�i .5- GOU/I I/ Jan / rLm-1C / LvC.A (Fg cj �l ( 126 if eOwc-12 C t y FL, //ra?,_ ego Me() izmpw a) - aim-) EZ O/m-M•Z,Z jolty\ K. 0(C• r Collier, /'G 6\-8 .2 _ isa-Q,n c\c tx- v� 'I\ Cal l a{ ,CDOn1.c Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and y Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Auto:ra• • County, State 0 d 2 r 1"j' -!moo i//C //�� t F[___. c Gov— // ntailll A m r i APY4Ple I Nfli 1 502� r .. • er , AWL) . l flex- H. �- e , +/n/2_ Ccal-& . Ca slit a-G n aiI •1V , �'c.� (vt vq/22_ /,i �'o,viv 9 l.�y ,r•`�_,, 4 /Iq,v CO c% /�s z 1 a r- pl r6/1A'- PaKfick M5 1" ak5 c\c. Moco 14-6-11Cotk / m S t IN AIVZOL L S i u E P. A I�o r; o �Cvd}?/� l�/!.i r . iv(:Al.,:-Z)ed2 FL ( , &Mr i le. SixnJcz - C4\1i tor %l. 1 �► v �lZ�� 4, /, AJ4() r i as / °( ZEL , 1: 1, Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to thetizens of Collier County;and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State t. r °rry. *-- 11- 2 ai Z lee 771 F/4-(-k7 h C ��/� �L - �� - zz :�o1n leIlai.t 1- - Z2 irsa,e 14lc c sec F - - � �' 01-4-,evQ f J 2 �'C.d! c ",1` ). /CiC/4kc ° 1 / J._ r Zl �Jc. fl k: J nl c C vc 1119. Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 1 d-7/� D i ctrl� ['Oaf( p.,,,,„ l I i r FL_ I 27 2- gC Wei -WV L?' -1-0 14c) Cr t l iei� Tt 7 ...Q `C.: 17/3 4- _}, / 1, 7 / Z �v r d) )Tl� ' , . 7 �� I.m A rcE �c__ c I f, I, FE L-I<< 11 '!a V+9i.S ___„,44 ., K� C;hz;t a.11-c FL r C' 4-1 1 1-7- I-Cl fl )'4 —vk l c V C \zti i I -Vc__ 4-ti-r. 4_ i 1 /c1-7/:4c.9,9.•"--"NAlyp ot I _F:y 1 _ ' ,i) t ,.;)\A c. c :\)\----)/ K ,-\)_ ipQ:-y Vic.-:;- ,,r,. &, 1 '. '._:T j I } _ i Mr)-1 ,.- I 0 o 4 111,—)1111. 4 t i i AM11111101111r_ ___________ AWINAllhAr o ,., r : e ' ,•� knr !WW1 . �lr Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Auto_ra•h Count State Adr A BIOVINIMMILINAMINIMAIMIX, • INPARIBILIMNIONAII. 11 (1 AMMEIBW, fr /11' A 7 c •,)o L r" e L C."/ /4/- £ G S F�( i I/iZ /77110aa Al 1.. AIRW^.MORWAT _szi _10 ATOP , 01 4 3 -A -MillEMPIRIPI-BrIPIO - I" • 4-- CAI/ �% "" ESZT . , p . Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State I Le-- NrIC_e LC .e- • 11l-c 9-"---.'(287//f 0121111-4( 4-1- 21 illt)D Z,n?i I E z —2:2 A. e . h - 702„ ..111MMEITOMWASITIMBEI=11/ . -cv 02 - r„Amvioramrext. - 1.�1 �•� oz _., ram_ C.a-1 .��� Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State yzi) 6 VII a__Ctl-s‘ Uor) (:' c; CL--- C--C-L-L L-CA_ Re_ ci f. N Pi 0 DC\i‘) \- \) ) ri 2S------? RiCkkQD P(€741,c-2,y_l co u ot__ ( I I1 0.\,, ti - . )_._ Ccl i, er LL_. d a L o-S Pr i Cr-4114. 14e I_j_.=___ 1//6, itc{ i'4- /-f lr,,ed Lc eSe2 ( Pe_ i l ,. , t a il I NM 111 UMWo the MI' .--- Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State D. 1, PIA P +- t_ PL c - a 7i C6 S lcl‘c, C L N tsu 11/4-/= , f✓ is t kt4e_sw , 10- I Z az C■ ' I�TIkL Le CYO 7 Yi X -a- a Namo iffingIONArn ,,:, Je Lee fL 1- Iz z 2 12A/ti1l f3 zAA7(s Cck.A tiG Co Isr {� �'C ��G�S\,I L t-1 Z - 22z- 41 e � ,Ql /'f Pit Ia Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autog aph County, State I— ( z- 2 l— (0 M ii,?cvkAOA0(- r (Al „___ K , . ( tiky (, \P.7 1- 1 o1 -44- sc z'-,-�S .a- Nc— Gc+-LT-e-r_ 'F-L -I -Zi c - C, q vu-to Lee- -O r L-. I, l 2' ZZ nil nc re-/-1-C t''cyrt; (�,-,vl� ,-itT� > aI�jE _ ( -FL 1- P.- Z Z Cti1 L C r l.A c r.---t- l c ic__ `1,j ti CI j--/ /"-/t 'a-9- Mary :'iamiso , -,1 47 47-- m 1 " 1 lTz-z__ (3i y6..,-, be-erP,-If-- • r--((.,zr-- ,c-1 --j - \-- 1- C, ._ v\ \, c7-31 v:3L_ it ' 2 )1---, \ - ' \... - p_21_, \./ \ (-----,,/t,1/ 1 \I k, t-IN, C 'f\''IS) , ---e'(\ /-l� a oo�w1� �v Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State z, L fFS Je,..., / E /1 7r �� ,4 cfC c �,a e. c �_44.3 LEA. 1711 (az osa.-C, —�c fib h fiff-- (/UP 1- Ai (Pf,r < aPt-r -L Air hi alrA014121711 - c- -ZZ • , �� . I - I ( . a4 .4 ►i,k. D. 01cii , , `' .irk , � � ; �.�•� � s � , ( /it / 2 z ( ( s74-Pf 57g - i 7) /( .,./_ /(/d(i(s 1 (((/ 2 z CCA-rAci/a ST12.,A(T \� , __��LC Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Auto raph County, State 2- 12'22 ) (CV) ECI �; _ ,15,c`CLOr(vg(-) VI \No& M Ate L Ii _ Z ,,,vS! Nf c - /; L 3 (_)-c_c (`-( KLQ us; a -17 -(9\a C_6k)L rn _6114-L 2-l7-2) rah- - a ' 643 1(i'e_�- Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State / -jZ MOCKS WU FL___ 7 L/ M/'r4 Te 9",e,f, ,L- v l 6 it �-- 07c-> -( G, //�[ ( �� - )k�Q(,6/L-!2t 0 • I z Le�q t-\)'1 tir-11 `' ne eS c a I f f ;..+' 1 p__ C_H(LNIC\ S*4111411 I/i g- ---4<1 rv, ' (% e__.1 , ,_ ) c ,,\I '\ec I FL 1 1- f i c �; i✓A- _ L C Q8 /�- (`4 ( I i ,c(. L I vi (- w AI�1- VA ///S ;: - � L ee4 1, _ - _ ���, I li.er, FL, ig i g Yl '?1'?'l. z _ y - `o11)�r FL C (g GI ( nitsth s z Lam, (� Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State C '✓M.,Cl3 S (l vE CskiLl; C tt L. a 1 /2 Et) ANG-tLlA49.13L� - ( � - 1, COc�IIEskz F'L f �-a- '�r�m 1 IOC ct 6 i-u e rc— L +ti AI,ygy„ [P (a_vt� bs�,� bt trn jets( \/ Mr" c_—) Mira 1Akcor-+ck nsl*0 tit, - U/ oIukf i() ,W i) //1 Cif*A.--ty, 4/4 lie `(--( fL // Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCostro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State z l ZZ -� /4! - cow G ! (► (l` Aa it'I/ C � 71/4-Wf ,� • r .� 1/2c12Z }``,��-ft L)d eArvv Arc a,ta gti��� r12.9 2 V ti t 1!V&—eAl • •It. Lem FL- t /v9;- .0aa 4v. (ei/ / e / .,, D2Ce 4 Mom' #� I. A . I. I AI I J ',A �'\IRII�:�It1;�1 .il��.. _ ✓ 1'S .111111M111 I 7l — F� laic e_7 CO(LA jor\K - ink :al raj T Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 01---tg---21.9z ----10 t---t1L-:13,4...e.47)6.K.- v, - , • • CX_Lut 4--1 ' 2 -_ _.. --- `r, N—Do-Nc) tia-k2/,',1, (jiri'LL A Ctl' "Ii' soi-(0/1-: /-1r1/ L (P/j A-��-le. - _�'N £ Art-�3 --L !! (/ . 1 111 . 4 v. _ I '- L / 22 4-i,....t-i-,, v 'Gr � L E.ti1 �� .. / (2'2, 4, ie ., . „ 0 ke;--r i Gt-ea,c_i Li., „ye ol, F f, You, 0 - ior ' . i A 1 ,I' / (fife A .2l-- '" • AIR�I , G V i r e ( (_0 e G,.Cc,, r.(/ L� a/VP- Ar Jrr s MGcre03 4j1-- ffi Ft or71 4 Ala pieJ Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State //L-2/2 L 'J rs 4.56,-,t _ ge//. ! , i 4 / 7 7 " '. (lA, ' dal( • 2 i‘e 6 _ e <, 1/, 1 l27 z z ( Cac_L. (Er F( 02_7 /2 --_ Z-r i .1,-N k) e_ iiIr.c.,,,e\ C; ,1,\IS: • Ca 0 ,, FL r /2 7 / 2 z 1/0141 S pt-e�4h r � (. ) /) 1 FL 1Z /�Z )4I ---1-or , )4- coy,. /az , P ztI , of`\1:7/--z- �ok y. �X resz ` ,v ( c 43,4 ..,Itu. c„,. /fez /-z- -` r Id,7pDaa. EICY -C-I t t om,. Aek /l/ '4r. 6,v-, /.-41 i 0, t- 6 -c; F C i I, C at n�l.,�� I (?? / ç4J7 �'— ( / ' -' / i (fir i,�-1 L� �� � - tukdszi , t„ c 1l 1.; I'z:- cptiv)/4,2 k\' --) i --)-----<. ', 1-\_. \ c.._ , c ( ''' Co 1 ) , r r 4--- L 1 Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State err; /l �-� ( `i7��/ � l r�i 1�i(.�l•( ��� Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for electi in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens f Collier a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Su of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens Collier C unty; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Auto h .---) County, State 40 -----h3M P71,1 (___ C t-("( --1 .LJ (- 1-QG -r2--- -- r , c,,...__ ., • L.-4A /-6 A ,,,,, yea.s-a , L ' ....k t / ra 1)4 Cv@ Re4 (A2e,d _ (:,d P-c_t F L- i4 /6117 Li'C L-4/ 14J -49 I t 4-c 17f 3. ,t : .c' t\ CIS1I r.C-R J if 1 4 / c ), '- ' LTIr , _C-mil:-f i - II -l//� f^ CT ra i�' 7 r n .�1�� (cs✓t� r` --) ``� _�(r;,t f Lv _ J` Y , / ,,, „ ,( ;` (re- ,mot / / \ , ' , / F F� i' R ( 1 1t Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State • -22_ 1.4 c.c.)r / 1 'pact(i/I',( 1 L ' �fiC �' FL— G _ 1) �� �U (,,Z�- �!�N! 6L S!�L I�(7 L11'G �-'�'" L.i.!i t'��-c�'�. r„ (1)1 etA ` w ..� .i,�L��,r'�-�,�'� t/fitn_..- _r..���..- �,r (,: 4 5- ,c ) iz, e a /;n ! jc �t % r . /( t (IFS t irc t L 3Il26111- i is c-ti ,` C T FL fit 00.- altibzu(j J-trapyileo 4,e.,12&,: ,,_ 0!:'`✓�'- [i d.- KE: . 114 1 ��L� r Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograp County, State �/ S H 1,3_Sy Mai �(-- . k-C—y,% 4,0, )..1 Choi I i ter i---- t B 2_2- /L— 4 , �,,. ' Cc l l , e.( FL_- flIJLA N/2� /k., Coduiv,3Li/ 111k;coch Al 1/ /Z 7 `+-nuS rnor, .. M,'KO(:_it / /i/S" 1-421 at5+-tcc tct)Cc5An , i-e .0,L 1. - n - /n / P.an-..oreff--411.. . l 8 L'-L J e..,<, Ij- A16;, c•. ,;. 1 ( '"1;i l:-UJ . c. FL n z 111#2,-2— f ►c f e St y Jw • kA-L �- C.Zk 1 S e r %L Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State no.1\‘,. \ r c OwC;'-7(01*. - /i -\\ '- '2, (4\111i() G <IItl)till (---C-.)‘)\\(.\-0‘ V i--- (9r J 3, "- �1, 7 � 1 l,-)UIPCI\P)- 1 I2%-1,1 1 K)U, s / - 4-Z1- M/C,/1 -EL FoL i z- L-t. . ... eOLL/62 FL Z — t - � i�� ,/i ./ - Z- ..- /W ' 60 r( " - :' ( or i 1 ,\-e. t r M e Cc O- ,/JC-6 . :y '✓x.-- 0 / ram Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 11 I II, -000o tillj R orit 0 )YVMS--------' C.G II, er IT L 1 -9 > -c1". - t 2 --"\-- r3u A iu \ � 61(` �� - 77----- (_ � ,} ;-j.e, t r(L., Cam__ _ (TO 6,1,,9 ,e r �G 1 , , r- ' k t, l II 1 - k"s a I�t. -k-F`l G l r i c di,t..o Jt/1 e��( LU-"'L c 2 Z \ C , '� �,� '� � y�' irk,__.._.=-- n ' a (.• {4- ,ter ' t :. ���.— - \- 14-22 \iki 4tirhY0L, 0 e._ i C.— 2,,11tc 1,-- Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autographm County, State 6 0i 2` _ a.. ' VD.. t-ir G //� C x , FL-- , S. "1'— _ ---a-i. < ['1 IRMAIPAWA,. . 14111=1,4 k ' I g . B H '1 �/ vlaw�t ' �. �y -. %)�,Cck 3�, C o I I r c�Y" / GI I- I 7 2,2- ,"I . ,c .. - RJ . -_ _r c3A el `�I� z ( . Co,�tif3u IrAi"---Th . i /f:3acock ti(s 1n -1/ . ? ---f „,...,s rn c r; OP" h-'&M c.1 Jr / �� I/,I r� / �-{"�.yG,/ -l 3-A. /Of,/ L Jfz.,en ? At . c 4.Z}e4 - J� e FL i j �� , i r 5tkil C�CZ- K� - cam:, 1 \ t, /i:)° ') L EL ,. Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to theCitizens of Collier County and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph Count State lees P/ i\ (1// - 2 - 2 z J61111 i-g- mar) a _f e t7A2i 24,e7/ivy Co J l,p, %t, 1- 5 - 22 Lc( FL_ L' l—A) " z ;V ECc4 LloLLteq- 44-1170-_c/ A; #?4)) te-foL 1);(74--) c2,C I- 0 L c J 2._ L( .� -�i f e i t� Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the(itizens of Collier Coun ytand Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State ( -cc 2c r�== ?CT►+=1 j, r341•yam s- z. '4. C �l f1 �Lc,��rr�f Z 2 t c c 2 2_ k 1 ��ji;i l n ' i� /!�</i^FtL, �wjJ /r .. Lr'I(._c it f Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State a ` �_ . r, 4.t.,0 v i--- f or toi 3, "\ ? i 'Yr-a l'Utrk)1 ---11/T1)) ' ' - -2 Z MiC a F 'L"'-- -Z4-c-E c ao 62 CL Y l ). ,tir e::a - 1 I N IPN- t(7::L% (zy t,4 c, .) 'FL 4' ' 2 L c-:: 'e It,'(1 '-4A" \ , - z z �/ '../A 17( / / 'q -('' Q MO., .„„ Qc,',),', (re. ' 7\, it — 100rri \\ ✓"1N1vkas/ r x �( 11/-142 ii t( 1r ri-,- ,. cc�a- ()jot f._e, 1' 2 _m,..wf 6 /r/ L. I/ `� 2 �� -t Z- 000"i t rc a i• - P2c7.1.. Cc ( I ) pc.,0, Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State i ' Cc It; c to io j_9.)� Ifs; Pl 1-1( f 2�- r7u /a -i“(, Ciflr `� — F r7 ---)-- ii‘----6 +A-- - - " , )„ ,,,,, , 7 , I ,, -t-- , - - � mac,'F1 -)�L�1 S t,(�3)( ; L/1 0 d( L - i ry \- `-t- 2 -eft: 5.2.4 1t:-..; -e--c /' P ... (-- -12- 4_4,.. ,_1 , 0 --Ct LA%) ' — - —el. 1 ..,r,C 2 'u " i ti 1774`��1G1in ---o1 ( (t(/ \ -: \/0E y,;irV rotAtl\ e, c (,)1kc e V- C Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for electi in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens cif Collier a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Su of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens Collier C unty; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Auto '. .h ---) County, State i . ` . , ' •. ► ' n ' -e-c L. - t(k. L1c 4.- , 6 - 17-/- /at,I l Lick 7:1 1...0l`. -. it J / f) 4 ei; iL mil z-, lut i -I �/u , C!W! it l�1; Ft , i 7 Willi 0. 1. lthAt,iechrws k.; iviv ev UAW/ 1 i 7 fi_i Hp1=- (-) --S,-f:->t--ii - c----A__,_ ----I,„ ' Lgc.)I t 1 _ic-.. i- � I A �/ t �C 3 {� li�}` S L- �,s / J n /t �C3/ty'��l�i� l cs ._ Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of"Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 11) i/(4Wav t,A) (t.4'15: 22_ --)A, f i.1 t.1 ' ,j t �',� �: C-v i.t.,l C �� 14-01-J- O rho 9i r �- ( ,rat'r usiiga RLA1 CA.,/,14-th cetELvs... FL, /CT —01'1 C C-Y-) ‘7(47 t /, C t T pL..f/' &��L baf 3 .11-hv �y+le� ; zi „)3ok ivy cc: \.( ct, E- pi ( Rft1,r <r b' ()"1- % - 1�Q. n C' eU . c;,), v. • Vie:;\ 0,0 t 1 t f l r,(.c, Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State OG,A‘ke) awc;5(00V. (ca,t;) r(oCiAq 2 Z Mi • EL F ozi_dE2 FL 1 - 1- N a '3-4l 1(0.- (9LL4'e ) q1/4- 2 U'a v;c) - 2 Cite d�z� M(_L • -c� 06 (ram YY\o(kr: \1 -vvkpkit-td Cc't1C)/(Q-.7\t l z z C, rG =-� Cot 1 ,� I/ /2-7, Why ck�4,� flu. L +� t( 1 e e cca. wo, f 2 co if r e-/C, I ly 2? t /y 't Z pavY e I I�t t ICC«h� 1//V Cc I 1 Fr() _Rid u Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for elections in Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens of Collier for a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisor of Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens of Collier County; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 119 I'''' t�,v�ur�,.J SeNr4.0 �_--� Il;et. FL ;?1 -L D 6440 mr /r 5 < < 2� I 5 4 'u li s 9ftikt (-I- N/6-- ( , F--- ( - -d -1 c.wn Lk, 509 ,tox ?g/-4/1 C d( Lbt-72- CI -L( • 2 C " , "te r'/�: _ a 2 1-4- 2._2- \-k-el:,: sa__14L..is-e,c- if/161%7 1"`f as s - - -- l tip-' C-ok I lC G' Petition For Public Forum on the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" Whereas, the use of "Mail In Ballot Drop Boxes" for electi 'n Collier County has not been presented to the Citizens f Collier a public debate and discussion; and Whereas, the emphasis by Supervisoi f Elections of mail in voting is a concern to the Citizens Collier C' unty; and Whereas, if a voter is able to drive to a drop box location, it is reasonable to expect that the voter can vote in person; and Therefor, We The People, living on the land, exercise our right under Article 1, Section 5 of the Florida Constitution to petition our government, hereby petition the Collier County Commissioners, Andy Solis, Penny Taylor, Burt Saunders, Bill McDaniel, and Rick LoCastro, and Collier County Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards to suspend the use of Ballot Drop Boxes until a proper public forum can be held. Date Printed Name Autos h County, State /0 ----hrn(iLeil e_ C t-C _ , - - --- - ( I (--)/2 , 16 .1Mv% -s A41 -&:Lt.iii."4—.L .w. 6. 1-6 e (QS t L LCLL1L4 t{gt -ac l_ . ✓ Z 4 #117 L;c G. / C l[. a. !L / ' 7.,.. , If 4 Aii Li:-4-; /1141)101671-ik) I API ' 0.46/(gA; 6, I i u.....Alm: _, i.c � 1A Fr _ ' I 1 i,HP ,__ A-:- �G, c:J , ''�Mgr - poi( i c.K., f IA VI C.-TOK.pr R e0-STRAL- .40--> Ce,Wer CoL/4c-i f ,ji DI. %- th..,, ! , .�./r' Cat[r a t o' U /' rr��c c , - �1►� a/(,4cc FL Petition to Prohibit the use of Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo,and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a),101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name Auto:ra•h Coun IC--I1c---- (& ,,�2 Z C r i'eA t I� C,,.,�. ' iir1.. C.; )I& , .2 /0 c Cs#N A 1 ' E.1 .fAldrarv �_ .. , / ;ar 7 2 Z �. ,7/ / ��dV C'° ( ( i • 5.I 1Af IT _Ir /GI sir, / !�` • - /2 2_2— tf/ 1 ? K 4 i� m v ii Y 2, 1 ._ 3- A • - • _ 10 i r _ f Ilk iffIVAi ( ." .4.9C4V.alow— v ,(___ - _ A r-• 1-4- : Aro-, ' .7 j• . 11 c t a? Zry i'u( ' 1rA Leak .--d".. e .%/1 Wj'1 s)`.) 1 et';2 it Cr-zi 2 4 +' ; y - G L 4 _Y_ 4f�-�ct7 (21 z. 16)/J Z✓/)/%�= „ '' t rk1 C e,( y1/ 9 '1")-2 J'0-)p4->' TF2Lt2zt ( `'flit _ Petition to Prohibit the use of Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c), and 101.69(3)and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. / Da a Printed Name Autograph County 3 f 22._ Nay Mr} rZp Mit)- "al letik--)# r,U/' �C4, GLI 'L- 3is 2 LVok J/0,11c// � 04.7,(__ c ( � Co //'e -• 34- /2,z t/;"1/,.A,,., J< ,.., (20 7/, .t,-- ,A/ 3l .2,1 R ii c 'IQ -Teri rzirQ' t(LLd ' CG l l i Cc,* 3 /4 (2Z << I,I,�FL pick-5 �, 0,/Aa? c0,E � i , .a- liw-rap C&rn P a. _..-0_,e,c,,Le) .. 3/0. 2 /mid/�,6i1/(//4'� t , 6 DX/ e/. 3/7/L2- " e 1 . :` q, Ctir;,- OI`.C'.f 3 /7 l y z— // o"' ,v,ve__(-/ir,, r-,-,, 4.-, 3/7/2 2 £ I4o 1t d ee df-/ Lt y 144, Ca q�t r 3( 0-2 -F:4 1> -'_ A 1 A-A- - Li 66- 03fr 22- 1(72c., ( Otc-72cd - -------- 1 (...._.61i i 7P--1 1 0/E Z2 td/70}/ ' re--1 fq. 4t,,1—,j4, ij '0,/ pot .i mud a. ��f cal/�e� -= g�22 aN�Cr, Zrd e . iic_v— Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor,We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name a utog - • County t:rt ,O; rr -Y 1b/ 2-.2— -JLV , f Lt► 0 ,--, C ta e.e;t- /jolZ?. �"p�y /Y)ev.J� pr / ,�� re, LLict '/Tn//Q aZ_ L`.1Ee Jr� r C „( ) r6 /0 I ZZ 1..--L ok 'Mom tS —C. /Ie M zl r b I.-z CrAvv,E S _, /- Vt 01 L✓/// hi IA?! (`-r,'l �. A%/ .d.9/4.07f /'p 11 f / 1 2 -//--L J AMINIIIIIWN/v< r / Z.,=-‘'-a I -.4 _.f / <_ ,/. , , 4 /AlitiLik<At - (0/10ti-- L t rl(I),4 / ,) ' , )J -� . ) Cc'L al Ic. _I I/ L. I- J U 4 /Nil - I L CC CC-t Lk: 7 1 (i /22 i(1orl l czt ke.;,u,Li ,' -t- Cc,i ,rY `��I I 7? z IA„Lc L i.i l (' / ,4 l "/I 2 0 /2_--,____ .k.--,,,,-,-(, t.,. lif i'evi.-‘,.4.,, ,,,‘ -•,,t'' 7:1 Z''' - C oil, --V. d ii .D ),) 66c i'r4- cc���,t 4 i Ca l ( 01/,"' Imo. 2 rn,-t,- < , ry and k-\ / - / `r7Q I r 4- mc C - ,fi b, c� E' Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name Autograph County -1 V\:-.) -2 L\-41,-P LJC,,— . . • N 4\\1)\? - ,---' °A -'' ak jUkoll 0(:E 1-(6( )/ i31..z i c,o7F----4 , /`. - ,'4,3 j2.1- • `h+ ), `ZlitIIQ 4' - . itl*t______ L6'' (- -41 '-:\t.,...? _.>-,t -._ , ,- 424(.1 -<---- IL pc-'- 624,&-g, /,.e�� zz/, CV �! , . i \ � -� i � / s; \ '4� k `. C 0 ': ‘' ; i(, ( ,i ii ':)\\ IA -,L-1/ , 6_U .-. 64.,,I,\I,A7 . C.,,_ z.)41) `72- nc, ci-w of)0 c - 1.0v . . 3 \, - .JbV\ 0 Let , 7 / ZZ �� > �/- ( e r AQ- `�._ �`A 1`� 1 , \_Q:Ai 12 c-k` (:; \ \, C Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas, the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c), and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name Auto ra County l Z ZZ . (-= 2c'!�c(� C—• c<- 1 l C,Y Co/1/ e z i t / Z� • ‘,L• U\zo i �_x r (1k ecr))i 3.1 ) )__ iril v t../. . , :,6- )f, all l L S, ' ti , ,-r :2 /G;r �� 'c / _,:f71-4p. 1 `fI, / -t , /_, �" c 1 ••72/11-1-) i_ r/(ji--r7 •.-_____ ,6:2 r-o-,1/4i etz_,...ci i 4 a a, C-A-. e'A i C- i-IS 4 1-ft 1 ij 9-�- ' D A/V(1 d ' fj ,7?//- --7- 2- "--/41. iz‘t.,. A r -‘e /2-17 -77--- 9 , illWrAi'i % r , V ��J i :2Y Vid;-- -- • ffArririfl . _.ffiraff,, • ' R I I Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas, the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c), and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name Auto:ra.h ___ Coun mirlarmensialaw„_ ___11.4ianniroM1 Airrir h/I 2AMINIEMMIIMMIEW i,;?P-ot.Q AZ.6 Q' .)-)- IZ 4 ter-- -c- l L---_41Willi -t----_ e I(( E-,.. 2_ 12_ AM KNEE.Paitk A --z,----• eci l rl 1/3C(i.ci,-\, �' dt-�P 2Z (1\•l\ � � kgal ( A-P�' 2 !2i22 mil)2c 1Ii azify) 1 -- ; ,erD���ki� / / 7 ci,i ie f140c- Iq- >- 1 4 it / te_--(--- 4 -`' 41 i / (14 AlAt 7./4/ i,- --,---" PM i - Z Z. 1 S. I Yt f. l 'IMIU II _GI Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voterito be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date fl Printed Name County /1 4.°C)}t5TS -271, 4 A 1)0e4e r ( 3 )la/2Z San(Jc ) JZ c cic .lic,-7-1 a&7 ' 1ic'u- rG 2 61 .Cc � . . roc.=a,d Z/ 2 - // Ic L4,q,,O /ti1 / ( .4/c}-4c_' �_J t L < 1L ( to1Ic€ 61,,&-,-1 YY _ ` LE ytc,,ka 6�e-, cam— 2 ./ Z 7 %wd r77 AcrAA,U-.‘e „ - 4".'/ C` -+-1r/n_ f1''( 4167"). it ., - 1 gi 22 (J -'\ 9 /1- 2,2_ --e 11 11 0/1,(71).. 0,/, 1". "6„,...„„., (d j It Mal,C2P('17)ea-(g-t1 01(:)(,,,/ .--ed `C(- 1 a w) bi- -4 A - Nilr r Z ►► tg1ry lid f ,/' P� «Ci___�__.1 � 1,eir li Sle M/. 2 PI/ .},Z2( 4 I9 .? ? ` a ci-7//7 gif,-, ,( ��,0 z/k o% ,q-xi nu/1M l 0/4-1-- --- Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location,it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo,and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name Autograph County 211014 S u s4,n 6afrl d�cu-r 6.hi'Cr alto faa ak 6 Bl4n� ,Q,�,�2 all b1aa bIccr,c Leb1Qhc e CAD]L; t_s— .61,,,, ceih-rfr- O 1ti. r 4C V l Rom! Gi /( r *,'K Ak ` C--0/ cl((o IAA �L U 57-eyG1 5 CoLy,6p., ? / Lka, r . r 644e/5 A 6!v y,,, 1/i 02 /O/3, i (la I 4-01 r g y itew-___ p., Ce5 ///tE-r 02 cl-41;‘41/,/ dlla�a . %i e f/�V t ay _4 r CSC/_ �r i01 Zz J oA KC-6r�1,- ,) 1 co l i c e Q. -2-h11- -IA41 s it L�sAu y. CO G.L / ..:z1 i 0 )- -SR ti f a W,l-i-1 K -�i-" -6, c.4_.1 2 jto1'?.'Z- . lrvC, JL- W it.4. /Pi 421/ lsr " G _ , r f .4 . . , -a5' �_.�i —- _ ik r G. ,--r. E.:0' obi # a ni Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro, and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c), and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name Autogra h County*4.1.2 ,lk'LZ41-c 40Yka.),-- 1`i9nto - r 4`I -R41,002- &I/i Y k110I22- GY-:kt�T II nn I-- a 1Ilei-- ail 0 22 `)--, i �s�l �- ins Co u1, et- 2I 1 ?2 C - -: �, 1 (;) cafi,- A I t6 VC ta.9.. CVLant('a �]c1�,e�n 'il.0 ('.f or et� the r� } t I(a- 6 tic—. A Se,V44-o..... I I I7 j. _ cO�l:Gr- Z/f U ZZ_ l tr •. • P v � 1 i rk 4-44—'2- Y&J J Al14kti,,t/ J 6 l/re 2ficf- - X u i er i% NC i '�.fi\ intr a D i I. s// 2 to 2 Z Da/ a thnjasq '! ;.''', (2)Li t t - -_ d • ` • �11- .ni .. _ ���, � � . 't�":� >•�, ' ?e>1.------ 7 a z Z. fr./e TW c3h 0 r ZZ-- m`f/?-1-t 6,4Ga-Sari .dam y.„. du 1 1 i 1'p- 1ib1 as Lisa unsber er ay) eou.L 'lie //A 7-1101 zL i((Oar) IA� dulnows�i ki..t-t' J �° Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas, the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name tograph County ag-OA 3-01) �1 LOCn'e,9 , ') _ ? - .. pis �s //" -&T7- .z 9`J (,JI. Z.Kom ill COLZIa d pi )2 6r, (, flu cipprvu A.--- (4--11‘ t r D(a 8 "-- +cj!`,b, Kcnre Zl _ O rc.'k ,..)1,1-11;P - --5-‘--.*e- )4,nock- 4,4 _ .,1/ - i --"i---c,._n_c.,,-e-, il /9-. - /C-7 ' . diekt21/ ( d7-7A? ` ` � f 1 �,�'' (1� J �' �. ��L A C°�.,;��v r,c�) .tea . 0 QR IV _ (.)1a r) L ' k ' . .ram la_A . 1..ee- Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor,We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c), and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. / Date Printed Name Autograph ,/ County -.)- _( ' - j)1'U l IL.-SLR e e .11- ;,f-- ��,//i f,/ - . iT, Lei eLv ,L, ie c i ' L (9. .99-(P,2 (7/4)/v/ 1 F►N�/ l� (Toll er ?/ 1 1-Z L c�.�-( Jo ,E1 C t-c-A..,t-- �, i*C )//ate.&L ,-- l,ti.-,_( C-i\ ., <- (,-;) btRoe K• pL'1-/7-b 1 I cy k. Pf.- ,1-6 i CcL(t. G ,;_ja.4.4,__)_. t-spide, ,---,/,,,, 4 t ge—v ' d .2 2/27, ko rem b�� 41() 4.i' ,(�r� eo/%e.� ,..? ,27/,m N4A) ii),,-r&ibe._ it xtre- • _Es. , , !._' 'it _ -L ' F� _ _� t -�'� Z zz 40 e2, ,Sh e//, // ( // 'cam' �__, ' . .._._•01taidiff.. .„4, • e el- Ai' . - C),47- 5 Zu° 6 CuG,-S £c,c ci ,0-1 Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3)and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed Name Autograph County 31)2 Li, 3061. "` 9'/ (2.01/, i,- i �� 4.)r f_ I`�tc Ieo i 2- 4 /11/1 *Ric-Ft )-02 2 1 3 'I 1, E r k�i� IA60 �l e-,,,n P, , (.D f I i ( 2-‘, (,z1i, rt. a, c,-,,c.-t-r- (g,/t. 6/ , 2 - 7k' A46-E72._ /1 a ei Ze--f-l-l-- -- ' 1--z - zz -),,,J _22, 0 . , .--;--, .il 9 / y/WgP J12t.-44e /16n/q),- `.mod - fi , 6,41.02- C°/4.cr alai as - (yf(rit‘ T-- ) d in i)rt(, (/ ) - Ter v ,.C ae_. ` a.- cs z ), < <l -:A -310). 5),,f/fit'-f,771,c4:.;c-) ji ,g- 40-/ ) , ,t,;(-_,8,-, . / ;) ' Li. J,/ie.4j.F ��GG+,!',L 6` /s-kt.1.-"k i f:C' )a i (. /'f--\_. G� (�-..- Ivi./ 472, i Z.,, ,,,.,:' '' QA,r.r.:-/4 2 7-2-7 L Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County s3 -/ 5--2 2- D c---/1 iu it,fl yoT Ta___ dac..e.L.e_kz ,1/4-72-e--6,___ Lo i_L, E., k._ :\ \-\\727.--'---2,- L'. .-, \ 3)r 7 /7 -2 PA-,,, oc 2,,„(-� ��s cr.-, )`2 't,/l, C- r- 3- 11-(0— f-' ( -7-c-1 ,6 ti7 Gs e 1-_ ,,,& t, ' , 04,1„,-- --2-_--- -- 17 ,),`� Szc t-c\sirs\c-+ C _S f i_LAA1---1 am. h -��' 2„ 0I/ ter ,i .--i t.)- us L6 0 - c_ ry "J L---- -- f- 6 C. 72( -I-i- ea Jr. s i--, -fix - _t t- Le —2-6/(4 fl /t , , , i 7: '/ .:7 - --2 -,- , ( CI- g -Cv.ti ,, n-i\--e_r5 7 l C (7 - 22 Z _ic -L cU/1--/L� !—',— d Y 'p ,),,/,,r- i '. 10,, 1/01 (-U //yer v 3- 1-1- a �� i* ,,.' A C: tLleir 1 FL Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County , ii 5/zz ir5,-,, - 44Eat4Leir,,,..,--- --- 3 ,i Z Z— / , .S%r•: le,,,) / ( $ /// e', - r . , J',A),':(,5//- 2 7_ i&01 /'�C- f'f ? '.(it L.c /// V `� 3/ s(z z /--)Dliw2_2, i lic one co t-t-v-) &.,-1 fc 6,1t - ti . ., _ic, <-x.)-k-t- n 4Hc6 e e/1 S-)16 r ' _i _,___ ),_0( 11- r1 / i .' i� 1 B-I Na, -, ov.a‘‘ co 1,e,c Repeal Florida Statutes allowing for Ballot Drop Boxes Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.69 establishes the authority for and procedures for return of vote- by-mail ballot; and, Whereas,the potential for vote fraud is increased with the use of ballot drop boxes;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election`integrity by eliminating the use of vote- by-mail ballot drop boxes; and, Whereas, if a voter is able to physically travel to a ballot drop box location, it is reasonable to expect a voter to be able to vote in person; and, Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.69 by repealing 101.69(2)(a), 101.69(2)(b), 101.69(2)(c),and 101.69(3) and to insert the following language: 101.69(2):The use of vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes is prohibited in the State of Florida. Date Printed ame r County 17 — — le_ 0c s 1:LGr' 1. t(13,-J / i yi7 �� s L i"1"V.�L `"•\. _ i l f�� (.) All( oe &1710c-y - ,t,,.....4.%c_...1,,,...,._ c ,,i He k z Z o 4-c�f�Ck(1 /� O .M, aS' �O l// i �:JO 4- ; 4 A &Ci ILI A) d 1� (- u, A t-z-c--") c i ,Lt` 1-1,=. ' /a, 4t 1u ter �� �r>/ --t n-) .9-(1�-� \.4--k e( c . `- ,I- 2,� jam` E c-- 7//v , /17(4 L)g /-/vi-..k - - c,,,ei/i, �0Nis E_ Q �� c \, , - - CU i a , aftLi Qt 2 j1z-i 5Amo 4 CrcT - , X/i - c �� � -,2),.9-) ►� - 11(;` 'Lk)) 70 tTAO Vp,v,A . l C 0 t t. rr_ Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date PrintedName Autograph Coun , Sji -22 a\ �c oL iIl;Ph /2 '/2.z e',Al/ 4y4.11CA) ,A- 4-1,3) Z 2 Vi_k-VOle-I --zi.si a . AP)241_21. L....ocu-k--e• ,1 3 y / / Z t C 4� C�h /4-✓p, MI ti vn I Pr4-1 ( 11(�( a U3 ) , gi/ ervv 6,z(!i /1_ II 2- )-• a- m ‘ caA N t,), PRI-Wit-irk i ,,,o- A,, )1,to-y\et,... e-elt..01..' > ‘"1 ) f ) LZ l.ov Culliti, ifi �a �o►n�.A �c_144-�0.- =1/7 07- - 1 T(-i,f,,e5 13. Accky,fk,.if ),14er, itt_c , 5C--141-!ch 1414 o;.. K,,A,, mcc_klite 6 )121.-J1.2?g-iik_ ,i7f6rosaq_ /./)9- /.�iG1 ' j b9' G/ &t ii'L 5iA4b,,,—i./'i -,-.f?9L/j,4' Aiiii fC�l (.o L i.,. . isitAy plact, NA& ,s- q A. C CoetleA,LO ' 1 $I I) AS1-lf3ieb a / Pr r of f k 51X0D 4ifk) ,- ®��7-el-c_. Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Print Name Auto p County 31 // 6- C. r L4 (;, v �� \ c,�� Q1S- , QVIA-Le) t z �� -0 t� UiL ' -; (- i -1---z- (-5 cA)rforc) Glk-( 3 i 2- -.1(, G f N t e✓` A r e) e C. \3\ 1 D- - \1\\ i ti- a VTIWt. l \ -er . . /a- 3 I1 `Pa Ilk Ld 14..0_r Ill'all t(mil �.- e- ' i .• ' rola ,) ,:.3 31 ag- 1---kyr vvv cf ---e_cvi- K____IWT Ce&-eHi ;•-e) . 3 3( )'a— VortA ss- cA, �., ...1. 1,r- ----- _ Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. op/ Printed Name Autograph County z' sj-P 1 V4 .e°4 i V )-c,- L i.‘'\, It j \ PA .e, 1) [c,.1-01 1=C ;/2-sJ9/z n' R n SW Cie) I I : e/r 51231'2- Z CVnY '‘ S-\\h0. V\Stie r k Ivy C 6 l 1 ev -*to' z 1.- 13 tte-(5 Pc12-41 -koi-Et'i C4 V2-4e. Z Z kcar�e5 �c ��+ Co t(i e r l,1zlE fin`- g A lle r �-f-[ 3 L Jam,. ec, e z - P0l4 „, . -,)&,2,..1 /k-g..e,_,, i 1 lei- c'Ai& I 01) (Clegr`, Ca7/41 /--7 - a J Al,l 3 2 c. 2 Z Co 1 1 Y Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name A togs p unty 32.6z�zZ k!6 ( W�ot� .� mac. .4s 6/ lleh fr- ' . I f I ,r �1,� v sly /; �6 31JQtJC � I P 71 om:;Y� ,-- CAS ..� 1' .,.� '/c de. ,4 -3/7 C/7 7 r-i r c, f ,O c �21,---.- +♦ //, et 7/7, I z z 1 , rr1 rc e9 4A .pea`6 ' Ce i',od /-i . k. #1 / 2 /d,2 " ,,z z ( / a4 ,c 2_ k k. C., / /'2 3/2,71 Z-Z 05 c j2 ,E e Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County 3 110I22 L 2 !v i e.ikM-s D ,kel-t' C. 2-1 ►`il , vt vlr Cl) I I'Q Y f�z '_..:1 `st { (!cvv�p hh _- c Al-p- < r k.1Q v�.e_ Pam` 343 J l I ,,.."1.- , 4 i 4/a-a-- ri�n r ON 640 It._ _ C of/i pL._ 313112 ft Rt l•)-(M\00,JeV a.ct9 i //6(._ 613 k [9,a- CcA utr ,t( jP.r ti_a-a l G, i��' /Ri- ;- J,4-yes Ga-<<.H`I LAC= Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Aut rah Coun (3 112'1- I&V►L. 1-\-a_iv► L.1.� 3I31 I z7_ �c\-kt i�0\1�t i %- 4.))' • I 6 11 .66 , t;;Ik. tUA--- \i ,(,\\PL--" -- 1.4-=-L, ,_ (3,11:La_ 'c,c921-,;vp4,-, i_ el-tr CSC M( , (31 ),0; , --tevell i'ak ck.I Po , 8M -2-5 i ,� � fn 47 6//16 n ti ip.)--- - ),(vca-v,,l1.6.1„1, at)p .../ — 1-ce_ 1, 3aren Rob;nsUi P-e-c.-�` - I zz . 7 A4/144- `ki _ ,/1/ -G-L__, 1 2 for,/ecru 1 ( +074` 02a6t. Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph aE-4�t� p�- County V///2Z 13tCL i1C9coE A (L F ,/lilz_ z_ '11, e V , 14., /1-6 '`.*/ ‘4 '..-W-J _L A._ A.Zoiief- / /� �c)(s _Ga ,..-efr- c-._v„ C 1 I , /2,1- of C.oes; -Cs—(-. (.. -, '1I i z- (-N,'�A- VA .t\Ci r — C0 1 i -1 C2 —*Iv_ ' a-it-1 R,W4 -\ 4—t '� � {oil f 2Z u E" MO� 11 c� t 4 1.:,T 2') c4Mi ' ` ( , 24— 6..c..----1 '112.4q canA...-r-z-e___ 6/2 z ffvev-1 Vwacee-s c.1 th r-----° 1 I a a.)— 41 VCel RXC)Cfj Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Au gra County 2- 12,7 (L _.1 G )(/. Y.) I) -z_z n fi_ a/6 -e ‘111"1)-2•' Ittf41.1 La.) zi I 7 LsA. Y/iI211,1 2- � 1 aIna 6r1-V Co1,f�1, v GI17 z "jaCie. itr46 L, C V /�-/2a 101, e 0,011 �, Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Prird Name Autograph County Y.-/6 - )- f n_c_e_;_c21 t-t vz-2 cvroc it k G as 77�7l. fu. j q I U a toll balb to - -001- A)-(4,-v 4 - ZZ InaVi• "Ok [( ,--c Co tb 1 i cPro � i(k)(A(,� .11rA fc f L Lie /ie/22 Sayce �3ra ItC1/2-2- Jotin-R. trezu Co, cZ- /�� Tor -� _- Z Arinkrlir ( /6r p� Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County Lifelpd\ s±rA6 Akatit cokLuuu / L cazra 171- mumlacowl) 1/ 1012? \-4_9 (q � Z-Z � ,� K�m� 0bas1,1 Go( l ,•et ' 1,r4 car S 11°, envIc4 1)09 • r 1ic-il.4a Jec1i ,r CtIi 'r iti /Lv "gyp �,< y O Coatev - ' 9) 04 tno,ta \ieW ovif atti-er 1.1.)11(11/ tve.1,,,,T-L,& 4 /'5 /zz g«v x re-e,,-/ CClIfe" Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Datee4 Printed Name 2 okra h County 4/-4/---9-e- /kit' c, t_. -5174-4 2/ti --- )_4_,-,,-,, c_.,, Lt.k•A 11‘. A rx '0 d--a- .�CW LA) — Th .��: -------- 4,<-_, ,c4,c-,-74/ , ,,,, /2 y/2 Z --fin , e ki, y'l x2-6. L. e ,e- 11/9‘t,), 4 e-ii- a i Ansurtiripm Pcaik. P c.Pe 4..711MILi. , ayto aktAaA r ' jtar,,. , '' (,t,?u MITAMMIlarl ZEIIIMI'- ' `� l �,c_ - Z ; - L►L Ltr all, ,er '' "a ° 3 GU'( S T��' MP.' efiar J t CO Lt.,/11 ,tea CIS �r..�. .' CANA / l Jam' Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification;; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County f72.2„,a a- He '�' �lli ed cc/A2AZ u �(?T ._ � e, �' to.�t�p. ,`jr•- K . -c;ww+wtlY Co !t 140- xceA £l ht5s ? � 1 � n g'la2 Us g-A4,11- L.— (4, � l) �- c I �� 1 CaCIi a C ' 4. A Co t A ,�� (iy dui r . ( ems f---°'fidAt ce)fr? ex 91 - Vc - — , ate',`' Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name r County /y/ate 10I," L ., ,, 61hfr- 4-- , )02,S aux. qa, - aa me1/4-pi 44) i"/ - /6-c -�'ZZ T � c� -mil .Jl C�.ccc� 0.—o- t- (1- Z2 6 t.1 --\bl ok) S-Sh,r,s, oil, - r L It/2-2 ii\X‘tt/ottail yJ v\n\jrcti -1), e rat S `1 L L- �r� ��a2 Mork/ _Soppy) -et_ • AAA__ L:11_10 o/ S'Vt3_4Mc, t.) tc) ()& 4c1)1/4-12-Clt at'144- e LOP 2 — A NI6 .A S-ToL.LIAckluP, CO LLB - Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County 4 1 . Li), I--I Z fit)Mil i S I Lee._ (a ('arole MAt'vq-t-o t 01 ,-0 1__E" 1/ti 04, 1-,,,e5J5 /,,- l� L - < kill CS ,01 (e--e -pJ s`ti/t/Co ems —6 Lt/c\ .-D,-Ir te , c7t - r-,--B 11 '.i ---1 yq ---loi:A fdez. - red A '3-- ------- -a:-- Ow ticuc ri(a-,9_ SL QVlek ViewVueL-v.J_/l L1' LEtMx cs_CSC(OA <p ).A-c- L Pe(nary Leo i-(\ 1 DJ G NI i-ik (2-A-61 no J..t ) - i_66._ . c-i - if). <afru k(0214f-ai5 A ea//�d� , M,Sen Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County Li,i'.tiy 1 la\YI/l(0 '16 , lk 00111ei/ =7/ — / 9 - L2 154c >)6, 24 n ef, / 1 �2 et-10 - Z2 e. 6'AckMttccel2u02A(aiwai, cn1hI �v- 1-�D . J 0- H CE 4,1,, - 10 -2Z C avA 0 kict CDAdQ____ off-/D -2 z /-W a l ,axle SI -/e) --. .a "Ro IF rea,rvi'i) Q-ef- -i-t.Z vAirtP- ' I-111- -- '-- .- auc-je_ . 4' -- /( -a a. ,o -La, Al. - -4 T Ii-r l - 2, J 1l, -e �. (,c,� Riau' . mil. // - / //e tc Q', Cov, fy J FL 17///- 041 - TZ- ,'a at., 4s'Dv `7: 4JL1Q—- a( Y ii.AS / -,<.. Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Nam- utogra County /—LZ— \b/Xii ' i�7,41 " I I l0 rL l `i'//-67'1 &,(AL P lilt Dti — . C- I—l‘ -�z Df�J Std'2h kVAL g ivv3asQ Lie / &f it -.A .R1J- r „k) IQ ( kz� � c�-. a) '� S . I/-2; 4/ c✓,, '..1/ -22 /" 6 ��— • " i Iii i tt> <\n7 \-ThCK 2 z Gi/•/p/c C w— - ('G/L e - I/ - "Rime/e( Fatocef-f- A044 'Ye £/lie Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Aut gra County 77/(' 2- 1:)-7v airy.*ek_ '-/I-aa Pe e o ) no (mi lli er -11 -zz Coll, 14-117..zz 1 da 441 to�c t Q)I1& C_- 4-III-z2 Cat v�--�5 IP 0.10-114 j4 $6/�'L /.a / �)' l V/W7.y \icae 14`/a ��� Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification, and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed ame Autogr County -77/ )).)- / //e-KIY,L ,04)1 ,./,:=_..., . IF/f 122 C )Arr 6 Sc,�ci,A.-1-."-e✓ ./l-i� o,.,r,,, ; GAP.) y-iq-a-- Jcs ‘ca tno1 ,en `" lra7hoonin�C ,Ohio .I/ 2 {Z 2 ile/NR6G1/ r� R-72 Q c / � ` ��� Z� � r - Z5� o/i-c" r < J P/ ,7_ ti Z._--2- / 1.v‘_„,„ 77- )-- --- IZCL,-(-- La riNuk c" 1-3 crirej .--c- --m57,.,„„idL) - 69-e'Cl--!(_el -CA'e---- i(-z'iI-021- SankEsti,11-Ft,, r,�ll , /� & J sCC •. li - 1 — a-a TAB Rszp i _ /- n 1----- `i_ /of - 2-Z .tN Avvaterw" ,w,--- L�:i/_ �e z /-ZZ 071 S. Cv676 e— a2w4.4,--e.( Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Auto•raph County Y//c/2 t £ �1 -� ��o S a.� — Il, Le e �f/ s- ��- 111111116., IP,/ WO `C (L)�112 LA\ l.en%. Wr a 57 2,7 o1 CCout eook Cdol i/z Lj/Z5/ ZZ 6/Zicw .4111110 0/ Co kC 101, 7`Z / /� , ' AV L • '� //C '— ) IZ 51 Z2 64 54 r( f-(-0 5 / -//f 6i L iC e ' E 10'1 _SA 1 (l C7 Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph / County `� d5��01 Dah�` I i � = 1!%i Gol1 , —v /d s7 .," Ems/ -,o' 7-,5%)- 1 1-TiC I c ont ���� 6- GL I ewe. :sf a-a d�(t&rk ie ems, 0 a° eC:P coil,er 0.5 2 2 4 ,1 t (cog otz cfl ,A‘„ Zz 1 A/V 0 "7"‘ 5G� ( it 12 ��-" iu e On UP n 47 11)„ r 9 IL74 '1!60/\ C ON1 k) 4 _(A,\A 7A sc,u_\iat,( ( i-- .9,. __A 73)11,3 ,,,,m4s- _ -15.00 ‘, . /icp . 40/.20--- \id9a-,7 iic? 4e-rn r, ' : eA...aLre_t e-i/s&pc) 614A L�rtbA Cb//4l — 46/101 c fi Le-harq' 7-54-e-frZi..1.46, �" k . L\, X/Q 12Z mot— , ,i `L(z_ 4�Q o to C b (1 Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name to•raph unty V4614 , aeli2-1211to 01 0 yLe !I/2,c 171,_ ic_ 1* (,}4-._ '0-A v iil. QI2._,iftL_ ql .i.7 3- i s Gy P, 7 1 c 1 L.(„k, ci _it 0/4--). .1._.-Joy.,4 ifQ.wroocii., 427/77 Gk.vdu,4A0 fi---1) L r.„ CO-1.4..4_(*.a--- 'tiz,7/2„2_ meat‘ kvdL C1/4_JE/, TO ifr s `{(�?1zv (fc�lc � ol� �, 1 , r � 1122 I Z7 e4 e�MgI, / , i La, bf', 22 - ,cam.--:.v. � ''� _5)___ lor 1-1 ' "/�� ' (2Z ,d 7CL 0-0,i� . , .6 , 2/4_ . AueR A 1- -a-1 -a? ' a- e_t;;A;Cfr Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph Count i ka y/'z 2 P cia • PetA 6/1/ ova, (tt I 00 a aol i<40k5-1 n f& (.M `�-a- 2 -- -(LIT-f+ L t vL.. ` rbi/teIt ..3- 2- - 2 2 - 1.4r-tHrL`1,0tAt cf ps0 � Ged2>v r o/lie r . .22 �k c, �.,ct ' c`) � t .emu ({ 4,01)-0 D (C2, -.) 2 d e/c'S7-e) tt) ic-2 /0/,\\\i.c 5-Ia\aa- Owr r ut) I tey- ( D-C e'a- -41- ) r / C Y Co\( =� Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully ---- prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Fla ida's elections. i Date Printedin Name / Autogr. h County .I 27);x / fr 1/A 3116A u ` _ (� co�,i� ei i Z Vi l�l hiz it r1 �,(4 , 14 PSGIt I`!2Z(7 777 1C,164f 13(1/7 A-4) Z. Lr)27/2Z -74 . L'-' • c- txov\v,\.4 Yi ea it LAIN 4.1 P?/2-.2 - { A e tte A4 1, } tik,. / . .?;1 /." L e-0— k ..� ),)_ ✓"�"( (�4-5`t M 1asz,,e ( (7 AA /4-71;:_, t'll I 4,m i 1/(,n/el ' 4 Y .t:tii, , 1-6_- q102_ 0 1244-12v-kra ri- a(4,4/ d ei_41E"._ Y/2f22- DG , C (/;tAs `,1 tiA` C'v fl(`61r I) a.)-- e-, ,i ,c— pc\-1,)v 6 4 L €._e___ y/alli1 PoNac,0 6-0v � co///,4.i yl ti- 1 2Z Pis« Met(6 rAtokcI ire-, Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name ar Autograph County -�j-G 1 4 Pt eiicwt�l Co// e 2- 12 Gnu N/-t LAP AA/3�A. L uL_ //ke/t S-3 `Aa. ,5 -tG fl fit( •-e._r- Sr-) -1? `t Ev., GAGS / CoofE/Z V-3 --e:2- -Donn ii- Qi asek GO6--tu tlk : . ► . C 0 Lb -_ t- . / C 4k_j 71/( i a- ....---- CO (..) r --, 7)2_1_ t,43‘ ,.....1_ ....s.,,. .-IL„) OS -z iiiiii'0r, _ 4h1 -3 tr , - / .1 Z/ou-)0 f i 3 .14 ' i-ou%se c )1•3 r l .01 I .f— Le -e Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autogr h County /3/zZ r i k ko: l � rrl�r` :i e.r r4Wr1una la -etc, a ee, 513 ),z;,____Dm rclaf(a maw ( j c/ '3 Z? Dotitig• , .34 5 .s a r-►a t---aL I It_cam_ �i�.L ,.L/ Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification, and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Auto:ra•h County 07//4 Dkvi 0 ',-,96---i- oPPL ' �27/L 2 !c:14._ 5e��i1 S �s-� V y Ca///Tc# / -r 427 7 /��J6p 11, �� /e .-- , 4,,a4e4)/c„..oz, -Atii.fr--- /._ Jam.z . z'i-cs,314 .{ 11 av - /-1D a(4No/sh.b0rt) 6)C4� CAD) L 4 / / a 5'ae/kt at�� 4 Coitcl-f • Lc_ 0_7- �oc• r� l\e_ LG t, n o, 1- ,,_ (Ps. �_, co 1 /,'--r r 4/,-.0 - a) '4bMil 014- 1 , , tt, . cc, /l ..er ‘7,-}1- —` , •, - La_e_ L ii/z2. Al ec,,,,a.er Porn,-- ' Lee, Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph County 'a—) 1\4.c,1„A,u- 1 �r , /;v//e-1- ,1A L/2 _ 1441-14,.4 A�� 6 t_ / ,`Z -�--1.- f\i.C\Y i Forc) c` C , Ll.. "1/a id, Letoret 3; it A So A kW'. alii- 7-4-- y / I- Az,i, v AA,--,— I /4.4 £ r,i,� �' (%1- �t-�-.,,�, Li-/R a�, itak, d\aR.N\ "A t, t �-t�e - 4 i 3 ( 2.-'2.-' 1)0.cit, A att/Cit: ,-AP -`--- IfIZE•ttp------ ' ( yriz_ ,i,c: & ` -- .Z2N d,,SAzseii ,r-- Vx"ipti..1fItc: '413 Imo\ Q‘s ' Le-e- 73/u fin— iso J LF P^ y1.61 . a. rv\ Col ► , cc--2Z :----- __ '� K4'ns 6.' ell-e✓ 4-3- a • /io 1-illC S /✓A L L 1 c_ 6 irrRf3 ARil Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Autograph Coun / �2 /� t �/V/ .- t 4tti�U/' ��G�_ ii �/fi'C�, 51(3()4 7412... cCel . •4 . L.- , f/S9Pel 1 AI 1-1, i ra, IN\c-cA. i k Cf&t‘94r , C: I k i Le.k.,_ GI qi aeky# JQNMc L) ' / 456- Vig(?--P- C9 t C. SLc) '� o L_L, ere_ (-) ;12Z C A<L_ s -7--&-ly , e 4., z_z_=_ .-. % 0 \-yi . 11.,-.A.„(ck - _-.( N ic-f. Q-- 7/44: A: 'I( V33/''-' L,� f �,cam. W A '‘,/7 ' 1iZZ 0 ,��c,�t I�C L h� C.� G 4L�/1 '-t-3-1z----- -- . -),-„„,-- ALI ,__. c,\‘-‘,.,_-a, ti---- -0 _ prkmi. . (AK! --/,(.,A,), .• ,4 , .z-, a_A, 0 6- iii3 y 21_ Ryw, reA4.. t Le e b129_ u-etahtti 1f YU' Z) Cr-e& Petition to the Florida State Legislature to fully prohibit ballot drop boxes. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances; and, Whereas, We the People see the use of ballot drop boxes as an obstruction to election integrity by the potential for chain of custody issues and lack of voter signature verification; and, Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes in the State of Florida. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to repeal all Florida State Statutes authorizing ballot drop boxes in Florida's elections. Date Printed Name Auto raph County —3 _ zv "1� en- �s %� ado-G/6s� ;.* M� wig ig ir:3 3/2 Z (S' � / Ca(-444.0— Cie,/ l/: r- `3 (r- 3 JZ �� fAllet,Ake 1. ICl- ,� N�,U..si.�ikz Rw2-\-) Fv Wi I • 3 S y 3�ZZ G�►2�S / eN/FN,a "V/3/1 Of�jfi9 11 J S c2-1 / l�l eS ��-� .ERCA" OINFSN DSOUZA 2000 I LES ICribil"- 2000 Mules By Dinesh D-Souza Silverspot Cinema 9118 Strada Place Suite 8205, Naples, Florida Tuesday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Wednesday - 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Thursday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm EF.CA DtNESN 17501.1IA 2000 4ULES I 0 ("4' 2000 Mules By Dinesh D-Souza Silverspot Cinema 9118 Strada Place Suite 8205, Naples, Florida Tuesday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Wednesday - 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Thursday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm 4'.EPICA" OINESN etSOUZA 2000 '4ULES II 164*• t� 2000 Mules By Dinesh D-Souza Silverspot Cinema 9118 Strada Place Suite 8205, Naples, Florida Tuesday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Wednesday - 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Thursday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm :IS OBAMA'S AMEP,CA D4NESH°SOUZA 2000 YttALES 101 ' 2000 Mules By Dinesh D-Souza Silverspot Cinema 9118 Strada Place Suite 8205, Naples, Florida Tuesday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Wednesday - 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Thursday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm .EAKA DINESN D'SOUZA 2000vmULES I 0 I 2000 Mules By Dinesh D-Souza Silverspot Cinema 9118 Strada Place Suite 8205, Naples, Florida Tuesday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Wednesday - 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm Thursday — 2:25pm, 4:45pm, 7:10pm oz 0 'fl n < N 0 r N N=' , A N r*, 0V W 41 SD 11. Ai ir V - w N M 2 00 A �-L N 0N I. n C A d J.. w _N w O Z g` a -W-N R A ;An a IQ ,,,, ,n iit.B-a 4 In 194, "'1n5 & A _ 0 lin v IA v 0 .16 ^ n 7 lQ O;hg T • . N Q o rD n O• Q M Q o * ni s< _ v, O O aa d I. p rD C Q_ R N 6' r, 6 O L. n N = (D Q. o '-' Q- s< • L Ll ■ O O N �.d5 C r • O <D O 112 rD al M h * 2 7 C r Q rD O •-' O n 7 Ti in Q_ 'O 7 S M X ID N 773 p p O • N a '-r 7 0) 7 VD 1.r, = 7- a rD y am c a o M 'fl n < y CD r NJ d m n N0A R. d p o a) Ola CO N °Nw 0 = ZAi i 1 0 i•i 0 41,j !.i j ; 6 u 4 41 tri \On—, NJ ou- N.) 0 su 40 tl vj- g = or lit,i'l si vr D _, tQo E Nm D v .- - -^O r 3 3 u, C ,-r N 7: N = rD n. 0 N O O rD o f a� Q Q. ao 0 x b a 74. 0) fl, —. 0,' v m ( = < < a, � -m to 0 m C S + 0_ :D 6 m- o; n ( 0 Ol o n co m m fD a o -* O- • H HMI III -^ Vf m > r 0—Z. OO C La - C <•- ZQ O ('C h � lQ 7 S fD -, to Q.fl_ 'V 7 : 7 MX fD ro N 7 rDD c. 3 N T N , . 6 a Fie) Q N C a. z13 -0 0 y n O MNJ • r C� P..) ( mT V in W W d 03 1"h N ;�, m n A V a -,,a,,-N' N 0 ID O 4 LA ',0-1....., 1.j .4 0 , .: C W CDrh W N. Ale ri . tm 5, .,.... - , Z W IN N co g *3- „ . • v, 73 ul o N z . O {n o O 4 O {A I., ,p 1 • \ m D v cr O r- O v�i a tn' Q rD - L C ,- fD N O a (1 O• Q• N a O * 7 N O a .�-rv - -. -"O• rD Cu v to O N tn "' a m !D o = ro 6 • [`� a) O n • o '* a • L L'I ■ o 0 c m D C a x o N `O g `o o to . -,, � Z �� p 2 D rrDD O. o ^ n 7C o °X m < y, 0 01 O 16 C a" ,..,.O d d • y aI) c a z 17 C) �3 r ArN N NA Vi re NoL N C r ` Cw A N C Nw o r*, n /ad N O = Z 4110 r3 IL 8 N4 2 _i •• ,sri ...4 g a. . W 0 IN X �il 1 v D - ilia' "- '' 0 VII, • \ r.T-, D < O n , O D Oa� -• 3a N 7 r�-r C r-r ,Y rD N N� -. SI N O o_o rD _ r, z o O _0 Q rD O- o 7 b a rv+ co - O,0 t_ rD a, _ a • Cu Nati, S, 6 Og rD C * a m E m w m 6 rD cs i o n -. n u 6 o to nm to m rD a P. ,tea Li L' III ^� re (p D r aL _2 O • O N un CCC < -s lQ r� K - 0 j� r cr. -- O .. G n S T. O' O ,.. < -,X A rD N 76 p 0/ O `4 N C rD a 3 M raaD - O--` ,-, C. d rD ,.^ v C N t 6 a or a rD C a Petition to require independent, full forensic audits in Florida Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.591 establishes the procedures for voting system audit; and, Whereas, 101.591(2)(c)(1)states:The division shall adopt rules for approval of an independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be Completely independent of the primary voting system; and, Whereas,we the undersigned believe the independent audit system should also be completely independent of the County Supervisor of Elections and independent of the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election. Therefor,We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida,lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.591(2)(c)(1)so that it reads: 101.591(2)(c) The division shall adopt rules for approval of a full forensic independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be: 1. Completely independent of the county Supervisor of Elections,the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election,and of the primary voting system. Date Pr"nted Name utograph County it?/ st�-� �� , t L.tiSk ZZ N , c L/ L ' L fc.;ec.1. GG► 4,Z M►aAl( IR 3 -- C.,,,(ilcva d aoivo G --e 4__br j1zz ( V/ 1-1- Z7 S .. R 2,.7 / 1 . 1,1 - �� // , A:.:,,,,.. .,,, ,, al,-,:t INV` ipp . r , tilie ar , e )-'")_ il z7 �/ "i/�� L '!'N� 1 ) ;` _j6k_ y' - i ,t.'.II - �r.�l/1y 1. ..I�i.1 A. A 1,,,,,, r I J _ I Petition to require independent, full forensic audits in Florida Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.591 establishes the procedures for voting system audit; and, Whereas, 101.591(2)(c)(1)states:The division shall adopt rules for approval of an independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be Completely independent of the primary voting system; and, Whereas,we the undersigned believe the independent audit system should also be completely independent of the County Supervisor of Elections and independent of the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election. Therefor,We The People,living on the land on the State of Florida,lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.591(2)(c)(1)so that it reads: 101.591(2)(c) The division shall adopt rules for approval of a full forensic independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be: 1. Completely independent of the county Supervisor of Elections,the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election,and of the primary voting system. Date Printed Name Autograph County lit/0- /ii:/olh Z27 50/t7/7 CD 7,1-/jr/%5' _ o/nr./.7 n ec3//e)a- /7.• �Jc3 �..���'t�l)- v7-,G�ic�� � .1i1L�d'+�/ e�a�2tif�/16CL,. e a-� �� �uJ�rr me--- as t o R. i _� .--e_e.. f 9/z 6eti d1 ti i -r. Lc n E �--) 't3� cisI - L1_.ci. 2? `I dl ESL ALG (r,�. -/ 1— ZZ W tic4 ki.i../6-----71 < q cqld j_ RtfiketL2,Alirovi-7 -P1b)144 LA-R_ R--f'0 2'Z, Lek. c.kw 1 n1�.PJ( �p it i-Pi-- �I z t 9 Q,r^ CtQG Q.A Petition to require independent, full forensic audits in Florida Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.591 establishes the procedures for voting system audit; and, Whereas, 101.591(2)(c)(1)states:The division shall adopt rules for approval of an independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be Completely independent of the primary voting system; and, Whereas,we the undersigned believe the independent audit system should also be completely independent of the County Supervisor of Elections and independent of the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election. Therefor,We The People,living on the land on the State of Florida,lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo,and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.591(2)(c)(1)so that it reads: 101.591(2)(c) The division shall adopt rules for approval of a full forensic independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be: 1. Completely independent of the county Supervisor of Elections,the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election,and of the primary voting system. Date Printed Name Autograph County 4(q Gi I° )�Z �1� 5 a MEAL aoLi tt. - Z/i 1-''' 0 ( S <<t i 11-24_ ks-i-isq 1(\_2p ras 44g- 41Y1-1 -1-- 6etit, b 1 1(h) , 1 ,__('" \ 4_ --cje4 t--1/01 f.);)- A--- -,-e"• .-1 ,'..-63 ---"tz e-c-c-.AW, _ / 4. ---( _ u Vo_. ( ) 4/c )Z Z -��C\c\ •v-► \ 3 O v�.\` " l c -. >c�f m. Aril •D-a :1-- L'0,--,p. IL k r �,..�;.,?), r� act, ____ cc e sck, CT ,-.....7 --k-Sg— 1-4arrta-rt A,-. °y in .2. M roa tit. ,t O k tilt'S -- - /,.ram „ 0,61/ 2 ei•ip • j-d- .V-ilfjo PlO,4_44 9 ee,L-t',ow._ .-,' to ILt A,'lzwif 1-4v, S /e c.11/f Q l )w S try. i3(0 v)la(9- ia (z . Via.,,.. � \� �.t Petition to require independent, full forensic audits in Florida Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.591 establishes the procedures for voting system audit; and, Whereas, 101.591(2)(c)(1)states:The division shall adopt rules for approval of an independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be Completely independent of the primary voting system; and, Whereas,we the undersigned believe the independent audit system should also be completely independent of the County Supervisor of Elections and independent of the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election. Therefor, We The People,living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo,and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.591(2)(c)(1)so that it reads: 101.591(2)(c) The division shall adopt rules for approval of a full forensic independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be: 1. Completely independent of the county Supervisor of Elections,the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election,and of the primary voting system. Date Printed Name Autograph County ` L C-Zt:i At n L. •r .12 1.-( , ' lc�_-z.2 r,,,....E.-,(-, �ii ji'�j O\�u C Q2c/ 2 y-/I - L-,__ c 1_, .c i -r A,l r� 4 -/i - ,da<n�iQ4.. Cc; .0,f o1r A� -,' -%1- o`Z,� /9//er w© A f �� c-ee. Co4/•� - IC y--ll - 7 'ate sow. iti �(P Co 7�a / i I/ — Z-� J Q,N21 4111-r � i/1 //- 4 eI.�1F ,-'nyI10-t f� 1'9 • � ),° --11 - 1--- ))Poit SAVai-4 1 eiei.A4 l)-Z2- `'1I s�t 4 /1`t' -II-2e z/ -// • T� , .� ✓c 4 `—e.. t,G- .a4- .-, Petition to require independent, full forensic audits in Florida Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.591 establishes the procedures for voting system audit; and, Whereas, 101.591(2)(c)(1)states:The division shall adopt rules for approval of an independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be Completely independent of the primary voting system; and, Whereas, we the undersigned believe the independent audit system should also be completely independent of the County Supervisor of Elections and independent of the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election. Therefor,We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida,lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.591(2)(c)(1)so that it reads: 101.591(2)(c) The division shall adopt rules for approval of a full forensic independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum,must be: 1. Completely independent of the county Supervisor of Elections,the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election,and of the primary voting system. Date Printed Name u graph —County n I� /l 22 UAf1/ (, Gl'l,�?r? C. 14 // /j 1- 1 ? I f ,/ yk �z ' f', Z-/ / ,c 9 01 li/A"rt 11-4-' -/ — zZ Ni u+(-LC 6 l 4i� Cv(a�7Z, C O� �►iJ�� ��C/3C�✓ l ,r/ / e 4 —17- -2 !( )(6 2 2 2 i r Li i L AMJ ',�ZL, L/ Ii "-,�-� �1, t( - , ),- ' � i v0 4 " f \k L( L11 Gyf Petition to require independent, full forensic audits in Florida Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.591 establishes the procedures for voting system audit; and, Whereas, 101.591(2)(c)(1) states:The division shall adopt rules for approval of an independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be Completely independent of the primary voting system;and, Whereas,we the undersigned believe the independent audit system should also be completely independent of the County Supervisor of Elections and independent of the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election. Therefor,We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida, lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro, and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.591(2)(c)(1)so that it reads: 101.591(2)(c) The division shall adopt rules for approval of a full forensic independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum, must be: 1. Completely independent of the county Supervisor of Elections,the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election,and of the primary voting system. Date Printed Name Autograph County (- I -- /;/? li\m/i)A,c,LA/ _/ �1 _3A- r,-w ci 3 � Nv (; � C - s -rare • 417,fry: .• - , L11 �` y .¢ 2-7_ 4 ;- 2\wi 0-, flye $.0 lir ( at'i V1( , 1i - z G. Qdc-y e0.e/ /s-cd f .moo PAL 8 cA Petition to require independent, full forensic audits in Florida Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.591 establishes the procedures for voting system audit; and, Whereas, 101.591(2)(c)(1)states:The division shall adopt rules for approval of an independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum,must be Completely independent of the primary voting system; and, Whereas,we the undersigned believe the independent audit system should also be completely independent of the County Supervisor of Elections and independent of the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election. Therefor, We The People, living on the land on the State of Florida,lawfully and formally petition our State Representatives Bob Rommel, Lauren Melo, and David Borerro,and our State Senator Kathleen Passidomo to amend State Statute 101.591(2)(c)(1)so that it reads: 101.591(2)(c) The division shall adopt rules for approval of a full forensic independent audit system which provide that the system, at a minimum,must be: 1. Completely independent of the county Supervisor of Elections,the county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election,and of the primary voting system. Date Printed Name Auto raph County 1/-3 2t in;cial gofFte J Cc'11, er N- 3 -2 Z- Lt.Cod—i 0�, I . 1"'c2:sp... S. —L, l_ ,a .e ty - - f as 2-1 :- r-- 913) Z 7_„ _,JA0T6 .\, -e r t( 3121_ ibaurb i ,%-ie-aoi-eti 9/, 44 01 t1/4-c-r-' /g/ 2- k;17775'1,11-d14 b 1%/70-1-/"/ e • 'i.v i Apr -V . 6iV,e/e,<_, 1-c-3 ' 7;1. poi\o‘e\c, - 3 -zZ i? I �e. n 6 i �� . r ,1% 4,1( L �—J L(—;--.)"-?"— ?ml.N/A•,-L, 5 0 gilt .10 ‘ '1, t,--- - 3 -- Z? ‘, ILL 7L- � ,L L_L-?-L 4 N— 3 - t 1 1-► , l k%el— ,Fit.�—Al if-0 1_r�t 4---3— aM__,----W.,- �—J c },-ate - v� U\l_ 1 ;Q-r'IA- S ' -1"Z .D L.4(-... ca)-- 0-t"..-"-- (Cr: 1 t l--V\ Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully d formally petition our State Legislators, L c t� o( �'.�<-,� 14crnwv'\ , and Q0.v '1ce.t , and 4-1-A R 5 dorvtd to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Dat Printed Name Autograph County '.; Y\ (VA' G.C\) (t VkcWt\r\,,,I\ a 4U 4+10 Z Z W, l(1 ail Plc lie.toy. (.-4-e I 2-2 .J o c_e_ i ra_Lty, \k-:.c_g__ A - L - - -/ A • r•a u.2 1401figallinekiMIMP-i.��iiPI :7 1-- Y. i MIIIMENSWEllr- 04 4rS7'. ii 4.3 ‘ ' AIMMIMIIA -- e 4117MF.Atit' ' wawe.4P1,17107,/.../.44_,_. ej _ Irtrr .4_,ValieS .....Mi MEOW 4 1 AIRIMEMEinifi AINTIVIN15111_....,h., r ..1m.ifiiii: 4NASIM,' IIMAPAran7P/ 1 :� ► P'e l) tgalW,j ,/ i E 'I Q ;-'cc. v rc. cQ .ram J / . 0 Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formAlly petition our State Legislator, 1.-4,,i:%4,n iAe� ,V QY\e- \ �A,.ss cleriNo , and 'a b c. I , and 0 Qy Q"-crc to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County 141 z2 .\�, "Ruk3as (R co i b , r j I't 12 2- t tc c 5//?, c� fi9i91l/� /L iet, a� igL S?rri f1 1 ier \ct z-t_ Nos,A I dower ', 1 ( �z-- lA�,(� (1, 1), ColiteI y I m. - ..... R_,,.x_ Fec.-4-4,.ei 3 0 - 6e-the y 4-/-bth;z____ ee,(,01( 4.(454pi it,40---d.)- -;,,,,„4/ Le_t- ` /o / , vnr . C11:6r- 191a-a 6 (sJ.e« se,/, Collie 2.- f (_ "l7 i `� AYI5 ,51,4a. 1'ite.✓ - lac-KaNiKs/ Vt i c H - 19-9 - ies5iccA Moiler\ l'fitUVc,- mahcnin3 ,On, a Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully an formally petition our State L islapors, �-�.�ce:� Qto, I�cAA-W s. ,c)cimo , and ei do e\ , and 10,vi EoCesTcJ to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County it42.2/ SE E S 01n1� ��` oil VI--- L e)-(--/A --)— Xd--(--ka r,,,t_hc Oci,.L, a(...‘-i c--1 .-. '(((IV/Z-1- ck..) e_ . a ,-() _ 'e—ve-- Y77-11,'1.- d a-Y4 o 1-4, tv fi/'' ''/ ' iiii.-ci' Ov Q, /Z-c7i; z -1— '[T 3 . wv'J eycil,_- x -I 1.241 22- 1,;„,i, - 1 i ,efte._ ' ,,,I 'N i -44q-c)d- 1/140_, ./Gt_ fac-4 Z--'e e_ vZ. ("1 � ,Ak i ' Q.-� tp, vrr- .Z Ai, iv i ri4. lM"---' l� ,6:vci-11 Vx4 a .a� M i*e. 40 r (.{ c.An Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, wfully and formally petition our State Legislators, 1C.-v.M A-A, Pass r,dov,a , La.►c(“\Ae-ko , and & P vare_1 , and f o,v; ' go c e_c-rc; to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Auto=�..h Count n Ai owl ' i 7 0 V 110 v. a dariariP ; jr d': . a ., a..mitimprAmEre . figigignifigfillrOM e ro ,e 11'a L L. t r Ur 76`L21_ Jr .d fif COLLTC >_`4 / )_ {lcauri t.( Cu�,jos ✓ t . : ._ I QQ d ._ I�Cti `c6 (J ✓ ) nr ,„,,,,,, C-. ' 0e' - Ca/c_ - /j. . d MILNEMIEMINEZC (!il Ct-tel- Z e 6=44464 3(1 4?// 1` zee_ 11142C\ ci-yelgoi)-1-e(\ u=4 _ V 01 -USlj114- :1 12-5 .-9- S.c 0 -k---t- To5,\--e iN to *--- 1-<t- 1-l�as a.a. i6NortiRryil c>s-k-or. c1 (_ ,EL 4-14- "a(7- ,i1jLitli 5aktit41-1-0Z-- 0,,,ii V4-1k-u COL' .it--,-- C.i) U, Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State egislators, L. o , ,,b ao rrt w•-al and c [ BGc QC( , and K.ck. \E& R SS, C)614Aa to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph Count L ` 12,5 Z.1- 51/2.. 2 2- 6-1 c 4-nr 406 d-ot-e-4\e-r -�445(2`t G�i,✓STaof/ k i,✓St_A-✓6, 41f c Ppm co 4e/6-.<- _ 1 psi 0)- - *-4-14if en 04/.1i-do 766z0,-,49-yr 10111-e r-- 71-1)—) t 6=-41 .0* , -446(1 co it.e 26,4/ of 2&-7-• ee 5Y1.di 76(16:6;116'0( t(If Y/26' ern() ) A• , AdrAN, /G4 LI box, �r J ykic, (zz, (66 , Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Q avl,8 K,5c ec(a ) B d� ladtAI I , and \L QA R_. s cr �wt cs , and Le,...“-eel A2(c.) to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County V/o?6A9 ,J =.Q V\ Z.eqcq d-.4-0-g ogyt.4Aev oWfi___ ___, Lfl )1 ,,t f i 6E-1=-0ti_k_._ k- J-G.-et-te (P - i ova `t Ala • `ti i nr' (/7Th\ . l/c_ A/kr £Z Hi eNae EtWCt ��-ez k , - -2. ((c.�iid,, ((c_ C;(-ut_.�tf , C �r tC(/'"_&1 ([1,ti -t-( ,/7/zv -62—k�tce-- okn. -y127 2 �--F 4eV�4 -- i - p.0-1 1 LU Nk .--), ea I 4, , ._(,i , ic_c) 0.4..,, -\- co,Lc . e_ —f •m 'ht4c rpx 'J itc -±_z_-1 -Z� ec..e..� s� _ _�.. _ ► 1 _ I(irr Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Lcku( ;n . (v r. , and fl)vh n r&v ) , and We-e'A PcK 5s< �c me to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County G(7-ffr"? /e' ,rh-n i Z 6( 2.."I --1. ,,, _ Z 2 4-..,-„ VIO A v•V ibi‘C I\ q 7lo D 3a- M w,1Lk� 7 1 _ ,,,, ,___, .,7 1_: " I 9 ( a1 [ 3,,a- e5. 1-).-N rc-,k5e7 7/..,>,7& ,2,•",e'f•-,j9,-- 00.07,c.-- ,...--- ....Or.-- -e.......... l//2/A ' 1l 41 1 f I (l ids _ "- (>1 ' /dlt CrM4,mtrt►1MrI A 1/l c- LCr�9 - 1 Tvv; t,sA-a- - Cv11 pr Y/L7/2 Doti, (,) l1rfs C' ulll-er Lt IL-?- /2_ )._ -1,-- "AA A )1, LL0-2_(),,, - / ,__,./ i.,, t---, ,,cli , __,. ,--- 1:1 ha l a,L Fitt) Pr-02 C. ago d Co U( 14--1 170 , 7 L Of ea- C Ce)cvn+6icGe ff c ,9y72-2 ft)VI\ Ck ffcc4/$4".3 ilie--N � , � pil ) / 11,E A/` Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, La:.)c€ev\ .M e_ c , and �- \Q A Y(l a ysr clom,. , and f;clta Rdrv‘w ._j to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Auto aph County Y. L- rti C r co fl( iefr-- ", , sa - 1,4-rivAtip1- , . •-41-- --(A'r Co )f, er- ,7g1,u -RN-0,-ia \<rt t k si-eAn /iv ail_Lzi.44) �2 / 3 Fetic, de 80 "3: CIO //r,E;� it- at a S a N (1 a r I l e V.!-4/2-/ OP U-)11,-4 G-e2-72- —S- Al.i0A . V - . tea- • c , qs d - 7r IS�L f= S 1-0 cep(C 2Z '14410111F 0 1. k ,r -5.— I �. I// __� 0 cal^ Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully,and formally petition our State LegitIslators, �e.k.\\A`—(\ Par:-:,5 f c0(VI 6 , and ilp& VMw« 1 , and I_au,l'ein AAeic to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County /A.7/2-Z.- 1-,.640___ 6�e s ,fr letAaf ..P-- -4--- Cam/; l/a-7/zZ C/,-PIA2 &Als-A4/1 &' i C/// e-I `t/a /aa- witztait, qtce e..,/ z,,FE ,?7 . _PAA 64 k i.1 o / Gx A lai Arkue AnolgrsoA) ( C ?tin 6e0Q6>Ft eolne p? 0? J C CI d1 P I --4 944 Yl a_ •n -i Co //,'P e)-- )--)_--bkikek PI All-P 4\___ P A • P UV-- � Z� LZ I�r tLL � Q � VLS��V1 l ,A Le,' ` ki'17/22 A\ex,„Aaei Pa›el�. / �,- i.—e-e- iz 7.1zz To ove- fo.s ru / / ze c 11 z 7 ZZ ph �tk.i t iA uC,4 tt , f.l f 4 & vie, ii z1 I7,-L VIOL ttlif. 1 L4n ' (*How , -ie. l • 41-L IM7 Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, W�the People, lawfully and ormally petition our State Legislators, o`b o e\x i _ - 1,\-ears QsS t ad wkd , and (-a.;ceA.Ak-e-ko , and Oc..t -\‘c, SCAT 'Q.-CC to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County - a.. SL.c.„.-..„ 1......4._en-n_a_r-cl 541.4.4.--,....-4.-con.",,s-4.0 0.-6 I t t--4-1- ,s-3 a #eirc_cs4l asOk it, (d1/e,, , Z _2 -b o n n - Q eJk Ql 1 Cry Z-1--/ 4' j 41 ,(\ktAq i \' ---CY .. ' , 3) ,,_, -'°Q(t, r a 7 3 f2 "--- cx-c-iNeYto, W1 CV6 -M Co`\ ttn (-3-.) ./e r 4. r/ S l 3 � �C.u-L , '� �/ - 3- /na J ,g- 40a,se b - ilo 1 / i. , . (,4 1 e_ e- Z (615 41 ram... ,Argil. ' t3✓ II . , -Ril r I ft Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct 'their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name A tograoh County 1/7.yat2 d Lw1 & ifi ,r, - ii -.A\b_,..{ / (..-----c. ---, ///e-K: ! AgE3//��Z-a <L -/AI...1 c n c1.js z `"I a- .. > \sL\v\tit V ph`0 J' ^ to a ttt— /i /- 2 &-/Z/l .J"- -fa^- o ,. n' IP k- .1111r lilt V-f rileil imiNW....rs„.istrir i # 4 4.4 al ZE- 1 1 3 an 0 m, Q► ollt - tee. `1 2-2- / Lu AYe.4. 1 b tur, ' ',Also,! I-EE Ili ,- )a.a_ knei2-ye„ (1(1,a) c c-----.12-4-,u,. c---cz„) t....,-,) - 3 -Z2 >r--/ 7&- -to6//w (:---2- 7-1- yr /55ss ai G o /i6.r� 1 -.j 44.4. =-fr4k- 1j Cu-fv�- n''� Lo I-` ,c_L Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph Coup/ -0161111,115' , 4.4,,t_ LI*, / I ter 31 a")--- .-km / N a u n- (.Gr1't c.c .I. ,L..t , eo/l/ rot' r [ Z Rc 'R Q al-- N ec-t Ps i NLusu-.. Q6JJ-L e� /3 i Pc/ '•btr ,. , ti.. fv 3/ 7 a ‘1A-ME-3 6-l 4-Lii?"1-17 v,, i d LC�t= / _7 Z Z 1r-!tih e? Z O ( c- �- p� /-4-- 1-J . (` 1 _ . Eke- k a. o'er_ �o r��A� x. S .-•PD . 3 / , 66 SC H e/2 ��� 7/111111I Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. to _2 Printed Na a utog a Coun 5e LL,IJC 2 r .- a"-t SD.- t oAoc- -. Scy-AD\u 3- „),,,,_ 4,-1... c:.. it-- v---7-, „ 71_ ,14--- (- -/zt,„________s 3.- i--4 Z (�,r-t .5, RickQrds (c 1,- . 4 1 a r C 4 L & itSkiv 3 t 22- tnailx if/ _-7 A ;. L , 1' ;r-C •Jr•�f - c Q aA - / o / 119MillIllrMrAlr 'r '/I d AO . —44 OM e ii �• 4 �; ` .� Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autogra h County )-d--- 1 J c .. Z_ Jai (`t , € . ,c / L c e 3/:�s/ ��- �,� 5���L.,: C-Cl_t.t — c-15./)?) VI t!'-(I eQ,S-I Z.,' ' ' _ k', e - (le(l(e? /..)_ _ 3 1' )I ll:t4ii4j1 (,, i ,(,, ' lUdkj.kthA , `c)1(\c i,- 3 ZS'/ TL k` _r" l- 4-._. -V A • ce4., - - ti> 7 G w1-mod ?c//t,,,1 3/o-5/22 / fis1, r 4. ( /iev 31 -7 51 2 L c‘v,5-\\ 0-- ‘1-,s'',rr- 1 '1"`"' A — C v i) ti F PO .c Hifi (7' c 1,r to li // _ 3142: i �, t- �I �� `,zrYC h r Co 1, I la fa , jI.U'G (..ram co ((fe,vt, F� Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County nil r n_t I PO-- Z(v- 2z Despha ( :wins c-1 (/ �� Ccf t e r 1'L C 5 jf.oh.(x)6,;?_P ae AcCo----i (ILA LOooD s&..) 12 kVir 14 "a_ ag l !'qk. t ,o /CY- Ott,,,y7ZA Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County 3i.2c122. 64-i}.0 � 'r2 '.A 7 pi/ (�« ,K.._ /2 cri -, t\Kkit,t)?,-)st (- t . ( •A__ r (1 ( _i-c art; Sx4 %qI z ,fps- j�� - pA til_ri alio. ort ......,. 0 7321 12'2: 41-1-1i4- N) tlek/.7 SirM) . 117" /- Lair 3 !a \ � �4 � ,,,,1/4../(1.1 , 1 -__oxvcAuc0,_ P/t1T-2— ,I ccceviv4 k Coll ttsr. 3 26 2 Z- Pa,-)r,_ kla,"4he'7- -04CLe 16 Z P, 5( 1b S. , i ti- Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County . :*3 '3 //2_2_ -j)(2 r [A.. .e.V'kt_e_ir [6,11,1,-t lA L._ -e__.. ._. ,5 ,31 a--)— un --c -4,ctA Lirt.. Ce-ttA_,L. 64,0-1.1z- 1L - 2 z �,p cat - 1, �� )-z)/p,, e'!6 h Co r i (e ti ZL 1 tL4K1 t 0r JO i///- � ,r RIc ' eddi q I it Zz- Mtc�h+: <1� 1) 1/Oft?, 4/ 1 fl 1.._1..., -I; 1 i___,..._ if OCusi tilAr AI it-f(ATI FL. Lt\i VL, Cktyt„... Csrip c.,(451 11 y �a -Tr6vat Orb-drif (2_2, ......../-66--- C,, ,:, I- „ _ C j//i'¢r � � /2Z �rCe �x � Lome- t Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Au raph n _ Count i#1 frg--11-2../ z__ 1,----4-1,- __u_L,t c r (V)Ali cis V'ekah, NI i'e(- ,4 1 Wee k YZ_ �X 1 aii z� btv l� wa ex)/ � 4r,, Ai-i, will C'n//i �i�Z Z - 7k/YA( Ca d 0,/1Z 1 1,Z l0 LJln, 44 - x • �-ee_ i ?1- LVfnv'i �'' 44 .l1a„-_ . k ,.> :� �0�,�,2 il 02/ o2 �IS2 W �`Z /7 i , 4 L2z� 7A.„ e e- q eaf,gemeA i - e,,,,,,, Lil )21 ._i ciin c< \_)c,ty 4-v-) I - 4 12 Z2 Jac�� Bair C a c , Coll►e)r qI aid(?. .)oil e 6x Ili 6 Cola er y1.Joe1 Ea Qnr14 �� cc /4 t-r Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Auto raph County 16112) C9.1.J2_C.kL t C, ,It GG/ .S (Ki/33; (Z L --i 'Q‘irt. i z e/e4 az 31ett2 Z c,-- c. (A A i Ct 11 %tY /q/aa <C-r\ (Lor(_ K(k. C_o1.1.rkr- 3I23 ItZ n pw.X 15..lr;�. ,,c f itibotv,)-- --13-3/21., �i 1 l )21,1-414 iir 3i2_ Iz-, ��C' 7< 44Cc O r(Vt - 7 -G a jc.ee"'i GL is )y �"" ( l � e 7 2- —22 Cu. • A4 :. v a E /_ i L i , ,/ ^L) --2Z F V- �!, ,, " ► WI_ — Ale. - 3 _z3 zz y AI _V Arm. i \- �, k c 23 Z E e.vF i Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County .?/ . 3 Li - ‘14) Ay.z>vi-l- tk,fl -Par w 3 ; (( 4944-dt: Li*E ,-)(6 r � 3 "Z zz C�✓1 Cc,wche Lee /051l /11trA e/ ftk 7)( - I& fr :,)))01 Ke(14 cql€111n/ta M ()///e 312t1IZZ. i 5i C.t( . / ; - _ cc, 4 2c) Ti i� �a Q '�.' COCr ZS 2 Kiwi t: 6153 &:' , CW c92cai7 Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and fggmally petition our State Legislators Laufer Md.o i C- •V\0-e� cksS'CJ L6 , and Qc�b K ern Q-\ , and O aJ\c) id,(-'R_s'd to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autogra County •4& il4/41Z Sede_,efie. , ,__k_ck___ Clc/ke , 2- z El i 1, 1:j C«1ct il`) f,L.�ct �e�ti.. C fir f-t. /-3 f&"/-0C ti ,EitiNCt ,� 7b lti � C (1 ) E--k 2/2 ,3 Lc,z .&ter; I" , - N-L-L,1A-1t Cc 7/' e Z 2--) ....AA 1>41' / (�L" //4 ._ _ i D simffamminmaillttiMIIMI I' I 2 LI 0' !'.b �//.l-4.<L. a ze. _Scal-7-7/7R1(1 ,..›- wr- f.A 'lir , ( „74.cf �2 c rs"-C'c 5 •cf JSS I /41/r�Z a-d,�,a 2 rN £ ) /Leiv)/n /0, _ � CoCG/��? Fc '/a1(a) (< c N1.1 (p C O k. I t..A C� // s'i a a-7 da- ri GA K,`i -� ii� 0rs:., Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and for ally petition our State Legislators, L-u ,c,1 n M - C \' -e \ kitS5 t c)Inc , and c ((o riwv\-€-k 1 , and 0r. 1 _,cx-e C C to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County a -:)7- ZZ - L,1,Q \Iun,-k <4, S:. Cr c4A.3 L i 7 1/? Z C__-r R4,�1 /1•1`�5�lze '<.� 1'L ie/- J Cie- _.� e -- Pyi-71), 1)f?-1.b g IY .G _,2,1 /39 A7C-kM 7"-1 yrt' //dre-t, ,.. : ()J b''- -.J e u ir, et,1 of-l 1,,0<<, , . ca--mi", ,--:-'?"--) -2-7/,-,- ,\ ---),_-....4--, 1,4 CI,/ --2_17 -7 kz._ LAL\ ,- c_ _ -(‘-k-A-- ' -.--c, 2_1_ ? a.� k, r�cd ' ' ea y �,rc._ "A f LVAN\ . e cl la-lads (br odic -- ao,tmAst-p-e---- t e� ncii---e-m/ Ca,,,t1 ,,,10- -101c. :9 Oeculcera , _c,,- ) C) A (([for o a__)') - 3.0 --CIS- " 14 ,-,' c_ ' tAivNly Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We e People, lawfully and. formal�yY petition our State Legislators, � `�Mee\ �tk\-1n\.Qe,\ Y sS�(ac)v and b„k -NIN INA° , and Oo'c\) aocec; d to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County ri J461 tr Peklk 0. 2Cri--2_Vc1- kick I - (o 3- 2)--7_0 A ak,cAk c ` c - - l 2 z z e C,I N.�s U�- Sy s. . C„ `2 V1 c (,-yc C c ((,c am 3--Z L__L/j‘l 4ksLi 3 7 -a kt i , A A ls( (�C t� �1 04'0. l } I nr - -2 / Ir L(2srrei (o l//e/ -7 -2,2, Kos:y RA(tsu-r C-0t�r�� 3 - 1 - -- 1O1}4)1 JZ HA' /// t .✓cam L?! e�- Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, d`o t .c)sr \ y.0-\1e,4✓` (c,ss `and La.l`F4\/AQ.kc , and DGv'. e>occ2cO to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County :%- ?4,1- fi'2i= i- /' 4 g; , i //2 ) 67/qie.7cz2_ ecit --0,() e 6,.- ://(cc- s ): ►))10J ' ik. C (,2hLPK }l A7 Iy iq ° ZZ ( I I- ( ._ 9c5 ' L " L..L (rc or I ( can (4,1 i 1 ox9chi r. ) )(i. kit I) j ,) dLI7t— c� )4 )1 i) Vi?( 02 :72- / )(), ,b/4'96, )'' L-Z-t ?Z 1-45.;L rei--e, ,,:k 9- <__ //9/„i2- btko/t_e_ ( : ()./tty:& &.,,z_ g _v - ivik ,, y/ei 1 n,/ sc A 4r,6.4t4m G ? rvy '-' 111 a (I 1../Ves Agile' / 71, f tOle4---- 41-Wry . /7 Y Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We t e Pepp le lawfully and form ly petition our State Legislators, c)V,1e--alytvm e 1 \\L&a-%\a Q S(\ > (C)cJw c, and i t, (k.,n Akke, , and 0 a 4 s‘6 C.?i o c-C 2 c e to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Aut graph County a' IQ- 2�- IL;� T al.\ e c 4 ' / co1C 3 r\u_ IZ€-4o0l(b\ri st ���,f.,� ` f c_.�..-Ir.rt ,..://F4 744;i- 1/Gipt,414-.Q.;,A-- 7 Jii ACM � c� -%� .. co///eV- i. 0/ ' �i , c--I' .Add 1 A ii1`AMA—. _ a 1 . ___A I.J Le_ �( c-t- zZ cy. id....,r..,, irN< - - - om C o( l, 3 11-a? ora ,0.eLP /e P :3 1 `1 12 Z t_; t��;CY 4 ( o\\ Qi ,Ili-TT-CI- 3/eAs_ 0 ,.1 a3 �S'csa.,Y✓...... ea i 0,4, Fit__ V1°y 7 c cv l'r�- ; - ,• ►\\V Z \.\c..t t 1c, t C c a -P C Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We th,People, lawfully and forma petition our State Legislators, 6`o o� �+ I , f-c)-�V a€� c��S�c�����d , and Q,,f k ().,cC_C© , and Lc:;c v /At c to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County Cliff a / \tc.\' W acre L p 12_ 9Nci, 3./. /I/2_42;2_ OcSAA) 440W 1--Lf // (? z- S-4c,r'A4t —�//e, 7) _ ^ V —7 I ig rVe co/her )/9 J /'� // k%1 h c �, (101).6F- 3.. J-9' 72 M 1 I� - Act(c- j.1%7) L l _ Lon - 31 i°I1a FLlc:2IR 3o•►-e;c -p C v • -311Ve--2- : i ' � T 3 I q La 1-44ro s (,J t ef„4,,,,' /,/ C-M�--- 3 /i� f z ah �i9�N ‘2„/„.._e _-) C7a1( �,( Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 of the Florida Constitution states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, Rep. Lauren Melo, Rep. Bob Rommel and Rep. David Borrero to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County \‘ (2 k Skl\C-V- 6'6 37/ Aj__ t,r- f //74.- • yf\1/4ar NIvA LO`\ei lg ZoZl D i ! LAeer - l/l Ner 0) 22 AdafiV \ C C ; FL .3/1) f9-?- c,-) 1 3161 a 9 de Co ( I; - 1Lc — A c12/(27,- zzr_r_ oi 71 Zew, - s c<xez-ve( 31 I�i O.uPM ��z 60 r L? 7 � Petcy 1 0 ‘4- a•, • e ��C�i ef Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislaors, L c „C2� M� c �� 1n��er��ays�dd:�a , and d D V.o v eA , and )o.f ()-)ocfe c o to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County 3-I 5 2.Z_ S ck,,d v'...'a. tla ii 9 w oJ2)J L-- �1 -2- 4-75---L) A 0-1- 0,2> ,4----/t ) s r zv L ,. 1 r 2 3 �t a" egv.Il G ' / e /1, �- koeeeT.� .. . C; /ic. &a_c[t 7,aCt-CjIV 6-aLti r - 2� i1 3- Y Ice Lecy,cAr jj e 4/2 L C e j)l scL244 314 e2ki l � CC I/, .n Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, 1�-c.\-1 2.Q-A �c;s 5 t c�)fvo, R.& Ro s A wke r , and 1,41/46-QAMe\o , and (Da. Rcc'z_rO to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autogr j7 County t/?'2 01 eiNi 7 t i..pzii ()„,(, ----, c_4)1 1, El---( i7 z iic,w i,. 1 : - � • �ry--/6 J ( G7 I�0/ -�— )f , ) ,.(_�e.��e� :- ��� L,e e— '3/4- (::i 4 11 to, , , d Q- lw. , AI I ('. 1€---.7 3_(6 2 c ► tip IU .t— iiiket , 3 -/Li- I-- _l 9 )<t h)7%A) . //ii/,i,1- (` --d yL . gig. • C- -7 -N-Ic v4.-- • 37c-/Lz r/ 5'�e2[ `'C./_-70.e. ) r11 �. ,..O.-,r,&.1i"�' 1--�TL'- I 161 )., C",( (. _ GA- c, CO c) c \ >s ,-- P-01Q L,A , 0„, b , 2 /„. tz.z___ ,,,,. /3..6 ,..,, . _ ,,,,,,,L.- c, t, 1(11?Z 'T dia-,(A-)6t -f c�-,_ ` C,t-- - C (1,r,. Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, 'i: vh 'aa;rnme.C, y_eck-vA.02n PSsidt)(VIC , and l,u,te.)A/"\t\c , and 00.N‘d &'acne S c to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County , Ife,2,. ,j0/7,ii le 6bil hnd c?)-)3/2 6./. Ak40 „,e.,.„ . 3,/', kick& o i l+kJ— lit N A/7 , l?b;)-_ kaft, Fre w, , . e.-.441 ,))t:4=,,LA„.52---- C 1-c1„.&_" - . ;3 c ' AIMINIIIIIMIIMINIEVW 6 , / 3, ...4.0._. /MMINITZWaltrFAM_ WES"i:e -4/".- -' Ming=111N2 rea I i II n Cr jar" _ 31 k v C 42- �. � //�'\AK t,i\_0,,cx. , lc Ii i I 1 Sb 6 r tAALik . i IL, 12-Z �.1 SA h/i i,3)_-{._ f/'� / /•t.� Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, _\Qe v.\ P455, me i (,v 2c wg e( , and nu..t`11 e)d“-QC Q , and 1,4u(R... .N\..I a to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County -`-\\-1 -a-a_ --- ----oc`,.7 _J N\ . C—i \I\I 'C () (- 's,A,..x_ PN_, -, fa is -I 7 . l\ I r ,)ia�� s � _ e t FL, '- ;\-1 if lk 0 I'WI(% MC4404 (Ct\l' .-.( 1-1, 1n ,`�- 16,71 :�\ ca- to LCC- f '31 - z r f--,--,, k--t�f .v k,i� Imo._ 1 3`I/ -, - o_P i- - e 1 t-r-1 z __ ±.C___ �j '/ ?—�.ti �F g/�/� 4'�,/4;� '„ LIZ ( 3 ( l 7 f` t c !/ i,v. c9 (t It) i -f L-C) C 1 ?)--- 1.-)—eZg-• '---?A-CH r t:CI, 11\-' ;All It.'f' (Z'*—,C:E— c-fr, ( _, , _i__ - /-?/)--)._ i ,C4 (9 P\/?-1' 7-2 Cd/7Zi, ;7( i6/a a- /te r F e, . ,r . •/ Petition to the Florida State Legislature to enact into law, independent, full forensic audits after every election. Whereas, Article I Section 1 states that all political power is inherent in the people..., and, Whereas, Article I Section 5 of the Florida Constitution states that the people shall have the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances. Whereas, Florida Statute 101.591 regards Voting system audits, and Whereas, We the People, citizens of Florida, seek to enact the requirements of independent, full forensic audits after every election. Therefor, We the People, lawfully and formally petition our State Legislators, - \1\\Qe Pet5---c:,,60 'c ( eotifv e 1 , and t__aJfizi Ake ia , anrd 0aN; '.) c.seco to amend State Statute 101.591 to replace the current requirement of a simple manual audit with an independent, full forensic audit. Date Printed Name Autograph County/ cesile z- ,i.n ,--),7-e__- _--/61 -,--e___ .._,, ,421=-7 .,,_ tii -7(--:, , 1:),-e_' ___ , 7 /7 2 I. "✓-:Z ll�Lr�l iitD &J r I-n4 i (J' 1.� i� 6 `7, L/. 3I/Xb ?— ( �/t fl( -la c-' ' - � i, Cc lhA �f INv-- tkNo l,le CL l �. ' �'�� vc),, 0 v_.)--61 i?)( 'i 2— Lore S ) ,[tk.e't --,c Ar__— 1yh v -, � 3-��'-�2, j -c;v4--- j. jC(f1, i (1 Ai A ft-04/1"-'.070- . S(1 AT( /1 . _ ,y, 3 /ql' -- Pe, ,C/N, �Fr` l��rx/ , , 1 i . fidie,- 11)1144 Z e ., 4 Z ' , v / ' ,i.c __c, L___ Precinct Summary for Manual Audit Conservation Collier Referendum Race Audited: Precinct Number: 141 Candidate Name or Issue Choice Voting System Manual Public Difference(+or—) Total Tally Total Yes 2,338 No 608L Number of ballots overvoted: 3 Number of ballots undervoted: I I I Number of indeterminate votes: (Attach a separate Precinct Summary for each precinct audited.) Rule 1 S-5.026, F.A.C. DS-DE 106(eff. 01/2014) PREC REPORT-GROUP DETAIL 2020 General Election Official Results November 3, 2020 Collier County, Florida Run Date:11/13/20 05:34 PM Report EL30A Page 1410-01 1410 141 TOTAL VOTES Y, ED VBN EV PV Conservation Collier Referendum (VOTE FOR) 1 Yes 2,338 79.36 375 1,191 768 4 No 608 20.64 127 232 249 0 Total 2,946 502 1,423 1.017 4 Over Votes 3 0 3 0 0 Under Votes 177 61 55 60 1 A , a =_ _F • • rF. CR5 It Voting System Post-Election Audit Report County: Collier Date of Election: 11/03/2020 Type of Audit(check applicable box): E✓ Manual Automated Independent Precinct Number(s):141 Race(if Manual Audit): Conservation Collier Referendum { 1. Overall accuracy of the audit: Highly accurate. 2. Description of any problems or discrepancies encountered: N/A 3. Likely cause of such problems or discrepancies: N/A I 4. Recommended corrective action with respect to avoiding or mitigating such circumstances in future elections: N/A Check applicable box and sign below: We hereby certify that the report of the voting system audit performed for the election is accurate and that attached are precinct summary reports for each precinct audited. ❑ We hereby certify that a voting system audit was not done because a manual recount was conducted under s. 102.166,Florida Statutes. Signatures of CountyCanvassingBoard members: .� f'! 1'' g � . Andy Solis 11/18/2020 Printed Name Signature \ Date Mike Provost. ; 11/18/2020 Printed Name Signature ,: Date Jennifer Edwards 11/18/2020 Printed Name Signature • Date Rule 1S-5.026,F.A.C. DS-DE 107(eff.01/2014) CD .,,� a n fD n tD 0 a �, o' o 0 MI t 2 0 < rt A Q.is: K v o (D h '"" A C e O --I z co ccA () I +. o41' 0 MI N. N) tl% to K_ N CD 0 CfQ 5n m a = cn v) til <o k * C ., a045 A: l n or' ►4 tw I O I—, m o+, " -1 n 01 0 u u o c �' 0 C ,, ..J A e= - a 'c .01.- d O coo 0 O 6 CI' »t .., o @ Cr 4 o' CD a co rt 4 A aa o✓ - c C ‘_ cc w, 0 "o C O O A c o - m Hor m 0 �p �s -I n,10 ' o - co ¢ o 0' —A, c 6 o q rn —1. —1. A 0 Co CO b g. cA to N 1V . I 0 CD CD 7:' b C_.--' o ;a d n C � Q: = �. n co - A v, Z Z r4 CD a n Z o y2 c. O p c: o 0 4 5. i 1 c n o CD e m 3 O Q O = CD S, e0CA w 0 p ''� 0 ON �C CD 0 0 ►� ex, r A n 4 tri c``o 0 * C r ,.� to 'Cr A ,W Cr. y 0. 4 : o E. c ° aC 3 s c = co y i .. eD 0 . 130 c, = e — = "0 Mr CD =.. 0 O o CD c 0. 0 `� c `o 5 o a' t. — y Cr Ft!' to et 5. A: 0 r* a o = C� 4:. o r 1 i 0 C b0 I / W N)CCJ N) O O m CD, N.) N.) ° o C.) C..) Cil 1 CD N ,A,r O -� 41. y 0 0 0 AD tv 1 d n • i' - A ro A: 0 `.-, . Q CA, Z. 0 A °, rn CD CD = ° e n o N e m a C.c n O -,cy y —1 ' vo v, N .,1 Cn CD N P rt. 0NIo IQ ¢I o I IItcr n C A.cp CDy .0 a. O AD / o "� cn »� 11 rm. t� a,c 2 CI' \ ' 4 02 ceo �G to ./ �, td o Ii H- - v) w to C o r—+ K 4:,j fp Zr q it ft a O R C CJ C7 d _a Po rn p; • - — o CJ CD ........ `D `c t-i — _a = C 0 CO CO I; CZ N..) IN.) ,. uoa O O at CD Z o CD CDril n N (%J n..`, (.e.3 A Ca 0 tV r 0 a. n CD c CD a Os o () oN R 5 3 m A = < A) 0 I O C? """ ca '-ri e0 m' gel) A Q+ K �+ X. O Al a CD r 2 ' C CD fl H _ K F —, \ AD ,ial; d 0 -� Ow' I. 11 y co n 45. N +r O_ o a ( i 4) C �� C CD 0 1-1 rz A, Kc F K C \ 0 K CD 0 a -a C o e o = et) I 4 o s a' G O K K Cr ~�+ 1' G C p ig u) L 1 .-r m O gr cr Ti; co CD O. ev CD 'CS ¢ O D' C (/Z S. K d CD — CD `.. 0 tT1 - C 0 CO CoC v, O CZ N N S IQ O O AD o O O 4 G1 "�Aao 0 I ro d n CD cory •;� a, CD o ra a. n v, zr'L zco � mo CO i•ig la o , o z ;.. k-.2 m g .4 a fa- -t n c t , � a 0 bay ,S = o�D co co n o O Cm 6 N Do -' O t! 7J(D 0 ~n 0. S A, s % n r`, o * C AD n or ^�., O ft f. ,, uk. ( -4. m 3" m 01 ,� <, 8 rs C ry k cu o '! ,gym C? c ' o f 1\\\.3 cn to i4 7, co ./ C C3 .-r rD IQ CO A fa.— p gyp. to Vj n A: 0 I m et O . •1 .. 0 e C7 C7 C7 7' sz cn CD Pa o' -I C7 = u ` o t1 M == 0 0 CO 00 to N N va ,-, CD CDDo N N a. coCDC 0 Vv -0ilo ..---,' g• .. . ''g• T- f,,, o. b d o ° C�' ?z "' ' Z A - O0 nVi O 3 � a. < a a Crco 0 C '.r, ra R. Cr ~ tv CD CO :i z� O p 11iv p tm -t 30 o < ;-' O n CL = r n : ip s on.' O �' �' Y c r) C � ecC 0 co co CD �' • - A01 Ow.+ C 66 o a ° = o o 2 a, . 0a - o' 0 ° C7d CD AD 0 0 La 0 ests. d • ° ° o 0• O =CO to ro s CD `fit f CD o CD et .0 f...01 < a 1 t7 C7 — d --N. �' sv 0 �c d to C 0 00 00 ° f co CDO S 0. �+, Ni N) o o O O CI N s1 Q,ro ifiJ y O :� ' ° d r C C C O O O O m O O O O O O o C C5 _0 o r > o 0 0 0 0 0 Cr 0 W > > o 0 0 0 U o oO o U 0 w W 7 Lo W co N co U) W W If) t() If) O Er", W O O W O O ) Inc) O LC) O W O lC) Inc (� W 5. .6 co U) U) U) Co U) Co m co ad N —, CO C!) Cn U) U) N f9 N N co i4 N co o� CO CO N CO N N CO CO a) U � D o 0 0 0 0 0 o CO O D U o O O O D U O o U o U D O o O o m 0 0 0 U m U co to — o 0 m e a� U U aUi vi C O co coE E fQ coco co CU LU co co — — E c E E m c c o ° -00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iD O C N cD m a) c o G C 7 O J O Q W W y Q Q > > > > > > w W W > > CL' a' > O> �' �' O CC O O O O O O CI in in N ) m to N y y ¢ vUi m Q Q W W d Q w d W Q m 4 N < W rn N W W 0 Q m c �' o c m ar m y m W m ti o m a� o o N v, 2 2 u) 2 w 2 m N 2 0 m xQ c c a a a Q n a 0 U U 5 Q a 'S U U 5 5 U 0 U o Pc' 5 o E (b o o a m co CO m W Q Q W W W W W W 0 ccu 0 a W W a a o) rn Q Q m Q o) a Q W ¢ a x x x 0) cn co m w w w CO CZ CO CO CO CO 03 to E c E E E E E E E E a) 2 - Q - - C O C C C C C C C C .• • O O c O O O O O O O O ,O .i C c O o . � C _� OOO OC o oo 0 V OOOOOO000 0 O 0 OO CD O OCO 0W W W O O CD W W 00 W CD W O O W O CD W W N N N N N N N (-NI N E C 2 m U) co co co U) Co co U) U) n m a c% U j c j co CV i, i) U) cn N c '15 c co U co co in co co U in in E 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 CJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U V O O V 03 o 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 U U p >` C C) m G) 3) ¢) N O O N o °� a E E CU CU C `° CU C cc CU co CU 41) (Ni -.E. E E E E E E E E E •�i m O - ''^�^ ,� S C C C C C v, O O O 0 0 0 c C C o> c o o c c c '� N 0 0 0 .� > > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > o 0 0 0 0 o o c o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 E Z p W W o 0 c,0 0 O o o O O W W W O 0 0 o O W W O O W o W 0 0 0 0 o w_ 0 0 o W w 0 O p ?. tQ cN0 CN CN U) Co W u) U) co co 0 u) N U U UN) co U) CI U) N u) N cn CV U) UN) Cn U) y UN cn cNn N N .. N c i 0 0 000000000 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 U U O 0 U 0 U 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 U O Q ° w C) rn Cl) a m a) m c a) Co CO tf > E E m m o 0) ro N cn 0 — — — E E E E E E E co a) J L _O O c O O E " CD CO 9 � 9) O 0 a) T N7 C CO U) CO U) U) CO O) U) U) CO fn CO .D fn v U U) U) to U) (o cn cn v) U) cTi c'i co co co co cn U U U) U) U co (j V) co V) U) U) CTj U) U) V) T T m m > > > > > > > > > 2 a m > > > > > m m > > c6 > co > > > > > cc > > > m L cw w w w W w w w w o 0 o w w w w w o o w w o W o w w w w w o w w w o 0 O_ > 0 O 0 m CD 'U 0 a) N 0 0) a) D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O -6. E 0 c c Q) O o N E > .O O o CO O O O 0 O O O y E E .6 .6 .6 .6 06 *3 .5 .i .5 E E E .6 .6 .6 .6 .6 E E o . E 0 E 06 .6 .6 06 . E 0 � co E E N O O co to Cl) to Cn to to Co Co O O O to U) to to to 0 O (1) U) O (f) O U) CO CO CO CO O CO U) CO O O 0 O W W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 W W W W W O O W W O W O W W W W W O W W W O O as E 0 C ›` 0.) C C 3 O .c O V co 5 a C m CU f4 C c C 0 O) > C d a c o a o CO in m` E o E m - -o — m __ , ,_ v _m o a) O 0 5 O C) Y >. o > > _c C4 2 >. 7 U) .O > U O) C Q U - E C E -c Q E f6 Y O N C T r co c6 To t " ti O O co x 7 v) _n3 @ cu N C EC c0 O N :J) — O '5 U . Y N O > F- Q oo m Cn 03 (0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 O D W W W C7 C.) C.0 C) 12 2 S S 2 S c -, -, - m --IJ J m * * * < c -I cn cn m cn co cn cn m m v v -o O O O O z E E E E E E r o DO a w oo 0, 0 C C :-- .. CD CD 6) C O 5- CD LD to N F x CU O N a) 0 DJ 0 C5 Cl) x C p f 3 r 3 m 3 CD 3 0ii C m m m 7 0. 7 C. cD 0.) pN (Z CD anCD0a � n 3 o7 CD cn o 0 O 0 3 m o' 7 0 7 s m m m m m o m m o m m m m o m m m m m m o m m o m m m m o m co cn cn Cn to cn O cn cn o co Cn cn Cn O to Co Co cn cn N O (n N o cn Cn Co cn 0 CD o co co ccnn cn cn 3 CO 07 3 � ( cWn ccnn 3. CWn ccnn N P. CO P. 3 01 Co 3 ccnn C C P. 3 90 U) 0 7 O. O O o O' o K 7 7 7 7 7 7 Cn O. 3 (C Cn Cn CD 3 N CD cn o 0 0 0 a a a C 3 3 3 0 3 3 m m m m m ° m m ° m m m m ° m m m m m m ° m m p m m m m ° m o < < < < < m < < CD < < < < 3i < < < < < < a( < < m < < < < 3) < .a-- CD Cn cn cn u) `00 cn Cn 0 cn co CIS cn ,2 cn Cn Cn Cn cn Cn ,2 Cn cn `aG Cn cn cn Cn sG co 7• co Cn CI) Cl) co Cn CD c. C C C C C C V CD N co N co -o O 0 CD CD n 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 to Cu a: co co co cn co co co c0 co co co CD CD CD CD O 0 0 0 0 o v 0 o v 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 ,-,) o O Cn Cn cn Cl) Cl) cn Cn CI) (n Cl) 0) CO cn Co Co Co Cn Co Cn w Cr) Cn cn CO CO CO u) 0) N • N ND ND N N N NDN.) N.) N.) NJN.) IV N.) IV NI NJN.) NJN..) N.) N N.) N coo 0 co o m o o m o 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 o m o CD m 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 co 0 0 C C < o 0 < o 0 0 0 < o 0 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 < 0 C C C < 0 O o a a o 0 N) c c_ E c c_ c cm-0 0 0 0' 5 o C 3 7 7 7 7 3 = o 3 3 3 3 w o o 0 m m co c0 0 10 cn co o co co co co co O 00002002000020000000002000020 Cn CO Cn CO CO T cn Cn 0 Cn CI) Cn 0) 0 Cn CI) cn Cn Cn OS0 Cn (n 0 Cl) Cn 0) CD � CD CV N N N DJIVN..) N DO N N N NJ N NJ DJ IVNJN N.) N.) N.) N.) N 0 0 0 0 0 m C C m 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 o m 0 0 0 C m 0 0 0 0 0 0 < o o < 0 0 0 0 < o 0 0 0 o C < 0 0 < 0 0 0 0 < 0 O 0 0 a o 0 C C_ C C C_ C_ O O O O a• o O 7 7 7 7 7 3 3 I 3 I I CD Cll m co m m m m co m 0 m m co rn m m m m m m m m x D D x D 0 D x cD x x D CD x D x 0 0 x C D D O o x o o o D o C = a C 0 C a 0 -0 -a C C 0 13 C "0 "0 v -o 0 C 0 13 -o '0 a 0 C CD O O CD O O O <3 O CC (D O O g a O a Cp @ a ID O O C Cp a a N O O cn K g cn K - cn m cn K K - 0 cn Cl) cn m `.t K K - cn cn u) 0 .- y o X X o X o X o 0 0 0 X X o o X o 0 0 0 0 X X o 0 0 0 0 0 X m m _ 7 m 5 m iD 7 7 E m 7 is co cc D 6 7 c m m co mE 7 O o a O a O 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 —3 m 3 3 co m c0 a) Cu o 0— co co co CO co co 0 0 0 0 0 ,, 00000000000000n, 000000000 Cn cn cn co Cn v, co co rx CO Cn CD CO CD Cn coCn co cn co (0 co cn 0 cn cn Cn Cn m Cn ND A N.) co NJ -4- CO CO CO CO CO Cl) CO CO CO CO CO 03 CO CO T co co co CC) cn NDO CP O Cn O m Cn CP 0 01Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn 01 CP Cn m Cn CP CP Cn Cn Cn O O 0 0 0 0 < O O xi 0 0 0 0 0 O C 0 0 0 0 < Cr O C) 0 0 0 0 0 O O cn CD O CD CD C 7 C 7 7 a N o ¢ C O 7 RobertsonTrish rish.robertson ricolliervotes.<ov-- Victoria Wojciechowski Hi Victoria - during the Primary and General elections drop boxes will be located at our main office as well as at our branch locations at the North Collier Government Services Center (Orange Blossom) and the new Heritage Bay Government Services Center. They will be accessible during regular business hours. Drop boxes will also be available during early voting hours at each early voting site. Our drop boxes (now known as "Secure Ballot Intake Stations") will be monitored by staff and election workers at all times. All of this is in accordance of Florida election law. Let me know if you have any other questions - happy to help! - Trish Robertson Show original message https://go.onelink.me/1 07872968?pid=inProduct&c=Global Internal YGrowth AndroidE mailSiq AndroidUsers w1=ym subl=Internal sub2=Global YGrowth sub3=Em ailSignature> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. No. , Original 3n the Oupreme Court of the ainiteb &tato STATE OF [INSERT YOUR STATE], Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES;SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF GEORGIA,STATE OF MICHIGAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,AND STATE OF WISCONSIN, Defendants. BILL OF COMPLAINT [counsel name, address] * Counsel of Record 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Exhibits iv Introduction 1 Nature of the Action 4 Jurisdiction and Venue 8 Plaintiff State raises an Article III case or controversy. 9 Sovereign immunity does not bar this action....10 Plaintiff State lacks an alternate remedy for this action 11 This action is timely 11 Parties 12 Legal Background 12 Facts 15 The uncontrolled use of mail-in ballots in 2020 made widespread election fraud inevitable 16 Electronic voting systems are inherently vulnerable to hacking and manipulation. 18 The State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 23 1. Arizona's election violated the Electors' Clause 23 2. Audits of Maricopa County found outcome-determinative numbers of unlawful votes. 24 The State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 29 1. The violations of Article II in Georgia resulted in outcome-determinative numbers of unlawful votes 30 11 2. Georgia's use of electronic voting machines opened the door to electronic manipulation of the vote. 34 3. The Georgia Senate Election Law Study Subcommittee found numerous outcome determinative numbers of unlawful votes and concluded the election results "must be viewed as untrustworthy." 37 The State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 39 1. The violations of Article II in Michigan resulted in outcome- determinative numbers of unlawful votes. 39 2. Election officials' illegal acts in Wayne County resulted in outcome determinative numbers of unlawful votes. 43 3. A"glitch" in electronic voting machines in Antrim County wrongly awarding 6,000 votes to Mr. Biden. 46 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 47 1. Pennsylvania's voter registration system can be easily hacked and manipulated. 47 lll 2. Pennsylvania's final results show 49,141 more votes than voters and the Secretary of State unlawfully certified the Pennsylvania election results. 49 3. Pennsylvania misled this Court and continued to illegally count tens of thousands of ballots received after November 3, 2020. 52 4. The Pennsylvania Secretary of State unconstitutionally threw out state election integrity laws governing mail-in ballots. 54 The State of Wisconsin's electoral voters were unlawfully certified and counted. 57 1. The Wisconsin Election Commission has obstructed investigations into the November 2020 election. 58 2. The Racine County Sheriff found the WEC committed a felony and three misdemeanors by encouraging voter fraud in nursing homes 60 3. The WEC's and other officials illegal use of drop boxes in violation of Wisconsin law 62 4. The WEC encouraged voters to illegally declare themselves "indefinitely confined" thereby avoiding ballot security requirements 64 5. The LAB found that 45,665 voters used identification to register that did not match the records on file 67 iv 6. The Office of the Special Counsel's findings of illegal votes in its First Interim Report. 67 7. Democrat operatives were given access to "hidden" networks connecting "sensitive machines" at the ballot tabulation center in Green Bay, WI 69 Count I: Electors Clause 70 Count II: Due Process 71 Count III: Guarantee Clause 72 Count IV: Take Care Clause 73 Prayer for Relief 73 TABLE OF EXHIBITS Memo., John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence, Views on Intelligence Community Election Security Analysis (Jan. 7, 2021) 1 Letter from Pamela S. Karlan, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, to Arizona Sen. Karen Fann (May 5, 2021) 2 Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project, Summary Report, Election Auditing, Key Issues and Perspectives (2018) 3 Declaration of Col. John R. Mills (USAR Ret.) (Nov. 21, 2021) 4 Declaration of J. Alex Halderman (Sept. 21, 2021) 5 Email, Steven Rosenberg, Fulton County Deputy County Attorney to Garland Favorito (Sept. 27, 2021) 6 V Email, Chris Harvey, Georgia Election Director, to Larry Sampson, Murray Cty., Georgia (Dec. 2, 2020) 7 Sen. William Ligon, Chairman, Election Law Study Subcommittee of the Georgia Standing Senate Judiciary Committee (Dec. 17, 2020) 8 Letter, Sen. William Ligon, Georgia State Senate, to Donald J. Trump (Jan. 2, 2021) 9 Genetski v. Benson, Case No. 20-000216-MM, (Mich. Ct. Claims, March 9, 2021) 10 Affidavit of Jessy Jacob (Nov. 7, 2020) 11 Affidavit of William Hartman (Nov. 18, 2020) 12 Affidavit of Monica Palmer (Nov. 18, 2020) 13 Affidavit of Lisa Gage (Dec. 10, 2020) 14 Affidavit of Ben Cotton (Apr. 8, 2021) 15 Letter, Rep. Francis X. Ryan, Pennsylvania House of Representatives, to Rep. Scott Perry, U.S. House of Representatives (Dec. 4, 2020) 16 Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau Report (Oct. 2021) 17 Presentation, Sheriff, Racine County, Wisconsin (Oct. 28, 2021) 18 First Interim Rept., Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (Nov. 10, 2021) 19 Cyber Ninjas, Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit, vol. III (Sept. 24, 2021) 20 A. V. Shiva Ayyadurai, Ph.D., Pattern Recognition Classification of Early Voting Ballot (EVB) Return Envelope Images for Signature Presence Detection: An Engineering Systems Approach to Identify Anomalies to Advance the Integrity of US. Election (Sept. 2124, 2021) 21 vi Letter, Eugene A. DePasquale, Pennsylvania Auditor General, to Tom Wolf, Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Dec. 13, 2019) 22 Wisconsin Elections Commission Memoranda, To: All Wisconsin Election Officials 3 (Aug. 19, 2020) 23 Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan 2020 Submitted to the Center for Tech & Civic Life, June 15, 2020, by the Mayors of Madison, Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay (Jun. 15, 2020) 24 1 "You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make a good use of it." John Adams INTRODUCTION We are in unchartered territory as a Nation. The November 2020 election was stolen. Our Country is divided in a manner not seen in over a century. Just last month, 56% of respondents agreed that"it's likely that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election"—a 5% increase since April 2021.1 The fault for this deepening divide lies directly with the federal and state public officials who not only abdicated their sworn duty to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, but in many cases actively sought to subvert it. The Justices of this Court can no longer ignore what the public already sees—a time in history like that which Churchill once characterized as the gathering storm. Revelations of rampant lawlessness by officials in states like Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Pennsylvania (collectively, "Defendant States") involving outcome-changing illegal votes appear daily. For example, in Pennsylvania, after all counties had finally uploaded their official November 2020 election results, there were still 49,171 more votes 1 That includes 84% of Republicans, 32% of Democrats, and 54% of Independents. Rasmussen Reports, Vote-By-Mail: Most Voters Think It Will Cause More Cheating (Oct. 11, 2021), httns://www.rasmussenreports.com/public content/politics/gene ral politics/october 2021/vote by mail most voters think it w ill cause more cheating(last visited Nov. 23, 2021). 2 than voters just one of many examples of illegal votes. Under express Pennsylvania law, the election should not have been certified. This September, it was revealed that election officials in Maricopa County, Arizona were caught red-handed destroying election records from the November 2020 election—in violation of federal law— after a court rejected the County's attempt to thwart the Arizona Senate's investigation into the November 2020 election. That investigation also found tens of thousands of illegal ballots, and that there were hundreds of thousands of corrupted or missing ballot images—on which the November 2020 election vote count is based. Also in September, a renowned cyber security expert, University of Michigan Professor J. Alex Halderman, revealed in a Georgia federal court that he had conclusively demonstrated that Dominion Voting Systems machines used in at least sixteen states can be easily hacked to "steal votes." Inexplicably, the district court denied Prof. Halderman's request to strategically unseal his expert report detailing these systemic vulnerabilities for the limited purpose of bringing it to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ("CISA") to attempt to fix these issues before the next election. Prof. Halderman also testified that Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger, a defendant in that case, refused to even look at the report or meet with him to go over these dangerous security vulnerabilities. The district court's decision to bury Prof. Halderman's evidence 3 and prevent it from being shared with authorities charged with protecting elections is unfathomable. This October, the Racine County, Wisconsin, Sheriff announced the results of a felony criminal investigation of the Wisconsin Election Commission ("WEC") into illegal vote harvesting in nursing homes. The Sheriff stated that the governing"election statute was in fact not just broken but shattered" in all 72 counties across Wisconsin and referred the case for prosecution. The validity of up to 50,000 ballots may be at issue as a consequence. Two issues regarding the November 2020 election are not in dispute, First, In the months leading up to the November 2020 election, a few non- legislative officials in the Defendant States used the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to unconstitutionally revise or violate their states' election laws. Their actions had one effect: to uniformly weaken security measures put in place by state legislatures to protect the integrity of the vote. These changes squarely violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 vesting state legislatures with plenary authority to make election law. These government officials then flooded the Defendant States with millions of illegal ballots to be sent through the mails, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody as required by law.2 2 See, e.g., Tiffany Morgan,Five Months After 2020 Election, Georgia Still Has Not Produced Chain of Custody Records for 355,000 Absentee Vote by Mail Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes, THE GEORGIA STAR NEWS, Apr. 8, 2021, available at https://georgiastarnews.com/2021/04/08/five-months-after-2020- election-georgic-still-has-not-produced-chain-of-custody- 4 Second, the United States' failure to challenge the Defendant States' violations of Article II, including at a time when four of eight justices had evenly split on whether to hear such violations in October 2020, violated the Take Care Clause and the Guarantee Clause of the Constitution commanding that the Executive "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" and that "the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." A stolen election, as the November 2020 election was, neither faithfully executes the law nor provides a republican form of government. Since Marbury v. Madison this Court has, on significant occasions, had to step into the breach in a time of tumult, declare what the law is, and right the ship. This is just such an occasion. In fact, it is situations precisely like the present—when the Constitution has been cast aside unchecked—that leads us to the current precipice. In times such as this, it is the duty of the Court to be a "faithful guardian[] of the Constitution." THE FEDERALIST No. 78, at 470 (C. Rossiter, ed. 1961) (A. Hamilton). Against that background, the State of [insert Your State] ("Plaintiff State") brings this action based on the following allegations: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiff State challenges the Defendant States' administration of the 2020 election under the records-for-355000-absentee-vote-by-m ail-ballots-deposited-in- drop-boxes!(last visited Nov. 23, 2021). 5 Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and their obstruction of audits and investigations into their actions in attempt to cover up their participation in stealing the November 2020 election. which injured Plaintiff State. 2. Plaintiff State further challenges United States and five federal officers for violating both the Guarantee Clause and Take Care Clause of Article IV, Section 4 and Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, respectively, by failing to remedy the Electors Clause violations which destroyed the integrity of the Peoples' vote in the November 2020 election. 3. This case presents two core questions of law: (i) Did Defendant States violate the Electors Clause or the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by taking—or by allowing—non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the November 2020 election? (ii) Did the federal defendants violate the Guarantee Clause or Take Care Clause by failing to pursue claims against the Defendant States for their constitutional 3 The five officers are the President of the United States,Vice- President of the United States, Attorney General of the United States, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, President Pro Tempore of the United States Senate(collectively, the"Officer Defendants"). 6 violations described above or by ignoring evidence of outcome-changing illegal votes in the Defendant States and worse by impeding investigations of illegal or fraudulent votes in at least one Defendant State? 4. By purporting to waive or otherwise modify the existing state law in a manner that was wholly ultra vires and not adopted by each state's legislature, Defendant States violated not only the Electors Clause, U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2, but also the Elections Clause, id. art. I, § 4 (to the extent that the Article I Elections Clause textually applies to the Article II process of selecting presidential electors). 5. Plaintiff State alleges that the United States flagrantly violated the Guarantee Clause and Take Care Clause permitting the November 2020 stolen election to stand. 6. Each of Defendant States acted in a common pattern. State officials, sometimes through pending litigation (e.g., settling "friendly" suits) and sometimes unilaterally by executive fiat, announced new rules for the conduct of the 2020 election that were inconsistent with existing state statutes defining what constitutes a lawful vote—and uniformly made it easier for illegal or fraudulent mail-in ballots to be cast. 7. Millions of unconstitutional and illegal mail-in ballots flooded the election systems across the Country that resulted in an election in November 2020 that was not "one person one vote" as required by the Constitution. 7 8. Further, officials in the Defendant States have since affirmatively impeded investigations and audits of the November 2020 election—in some instances in destroying election records—to conceal evidence demonstrating the illegal votes and fraud in the November 2020 election. Similarly, the federal Department of Justice has attempted to impede efforts to investigate election fraud, including threatening to investigate the Arizona State Senate for investigating election irregularities in Maricopa County.4 9. In addition, on January 7, 2021, the Director of National Intelligence ("DNI") concluded in an unclassified memorandum that "CIA Management took actions `pressuring [analysts] to withdraw their support" for findings regarding China's actions to "interfere" in the election. Memo., John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence, Views on Intelligence Community Election Security Analysis, at 2 (Jan. 7, 2021) (Tab 1). The DNI concluded that the CIA's actions violated Intelligence Community Tradecraft Standards. Id. 10. The unconstitutional acts and proof of a stolen election through illegal and fraudulent ballots is also demonstrated by new evidence arising since December 11, 2020, that the number of ballots cast in violation of the Electors Clause and Due Process Clause in Defendant States exceeds the reported See Letter from Pamela S. Karlan, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, to Arizona Sen. Karen Fann (May 5, 2021) (Tab 2). 8 margin separating the candidates and thus the validity of the presidential electors from those States. 11. The number of votes called into question by these constitutional violations greatly exceeds the difference between the vote totals of the two candidates for President of the United States in each Defendant State. 12. In addition to injunctive relief sought for the November 2020 election, Plaintiff State seeks declaratory relief for all federal elections in the future. This problem is clearly capable of repetition yet evading review. The integrity of our constitutional democracy requires that states conduct presidential elections in accordance with the rule of law and federal constitutional guarantees. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 13. This action is within this Court's original jurisdiction under three distinct bases: (a) as a "controvers[y] between two or more States" with respect to Plaintiff State and Defendant States, 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a); U.S. CONST. art III, § 2, 04 as a "controvers[y] between the United States and a State" with respect to Plaintiff State and the United States, 28 U.S.C. § 1251(b)(2); U.S. CONST. art III, § 2, and (c)ias an "actionf ... by a State against the citizens of another State" with respect to Plaintiff State and the federal Officer Defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1251(b)(3); U.S. CONST. art III, § 2; South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301, 307 (1966). 9 Plaintiff State raises an Article III case or controversy. 14. In a presidential election, "the impact of the votes cast in each State is affected by the votes cast for the various candidates in other States." Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780, 795 (1983). The constitutional failures of the United States and the Defendant States injured the Plaintiff State by subverting the electoral process and disillusioning voters from the inherently dishonest process of federal elections controlled by non-legislative actors. 15. This Court's Article III decisions limit the ability of citizens to press claims under the Electors Clause. Lance v. Coffman, 549 U.S. 437, 442 (2007) (distinguishing citizen plaintiffs from citizen relators who sued in the name of a state); cf. Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 520 (2007) (courts owe states "special solicitude in standing analysis"). The Constitution is a compact among the States, and the Defendant States' breach of the terms of that compact injures the other states. 16. Because the Defendant States represent a dispositive number of electoral votes, this Court can redress Plaintiff State's injuries by vacating the certification of Defendant States' presidential elector§ and the vote of the Electoral College as certified by the Joint Session of Congress. Because redressability likely would undermine a suit against a single state officer or State because no single State's electoral votes would change the election outcome, this action against the United States and multiple State defendants is the only action that can redress Plaintiff State's injury. 10 17. Under the circumstances presented, Plaintiff State has the right under the Twelfth Amendment „to participate in an election of the President and Vice President in the House and Senate, respectively, U.S. CONST. art. XII, which the defendants' unlawful actions denied Plaintiff State and which this Court can redress by ordering that that election take place. 18. The States enjoy a right of suffrage in the Senate, U.S. CONST. art. V, and Vice-President casts the tie-breaking vote in the Senate. U.S. CONST. art. II, § 3, cl. 4. As of the certification of two Georgia run- off elections in January of 2021, the Senate is evenly divided, and the election of the Vice-President will determine which party—that of Plaintiff State's two senators or that of the opposition party—will have the majority in the Senate. The constitutional violations alleged herein denied Plaintiff State's senators the advantage of majority status in the Senate. Sovereign immunity does not bar this action. 19. Defendant United States has waived its sovereign immunity for actions against the Attorney General, 5 U.S.C. § 702, and sovereign immunity does not protect the Officer Defendants from suits against unconstitutional action and inaction. Franklin v. Massachusetts, 505 U.S. 788, 800-01 (1992) (citing Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)). "No separate waiver of sovereign immunity is required to seek a writ of mandamus to compel an official to perform a duty required in his official capacity."Fornaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63, 69 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Roberts, J.); cf. 28 U.S.C. § 1361. 11 Plaintiff State lacks an alternate remedy for this action. 20. Individual state courts or U.S. district courts do not—and under the circumstance of contested elections in multiple states, cannot—offer an adequate remedy to resolve election disputes within the timeframe set by the Constitution to resolve such disputes and to appoint a President via the electoral college. No court—other than this Court—can redress constitutional injuries spanning multiple States with the sufficient number of states joined as defendants or respondents to alter the result in the Electoral College. 21. This Court is the sole judicial forum in which to exercise the jurisdictional basis for this action. 22. The political branches do not provide an adequate forum which to resolve the claims against the Officer Defendants or the United States because the Officer Defendants control the executive and legislative branches of the United States government. This action is timely. 23. In the absence of a directly applicable statute of limitations, actions against the United States must be brought within six years of the action's arising, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a), and the limitation set by the equitable doctrine of laches cannot be less than the statute of limitations. SCA Hygiene Prods. Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC, 137 S.Ct. 954, 960 (2017). In any event, Plaintiff State has brought this action promptly after the development of 12 new evidence that was previously unavailable. For these reasons, this action is timely. PARTIES 24. Plaintiff is the State of [insert Your State], which is a sovereign State of the United States. 25. Defendants are the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the States of Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, and Wisconsin, which are sovereign States of the United States. 26. Defendant United States is the federal sovereign. 27. Defendants President of the United States, Vice- President of the United States, Attorney General of the United States, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, President Pro Tenipore of the United States Senate (collectively, the "Officer Defendants") are officers of the United States sued in their official capacities and named by the office they hold. See S. Ct. Rule 35.4. The current officers—Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Patrick Leahy, and Merrick Garland—are citizens of Delaware, California, California, Vermont, and Maryland, respectively. LEGAL BACKGROUND 28.' Under the Supremacy Clause, the "Con- stitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme law of the land." U.S. CoNST. Art. VI, cl. 2. 29. "The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the 13 state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the electoral college." Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000) (citing U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1) ("Bush IT'). 30. State legislatures have plenary power to set the process for appointing presidential electors: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors." U.S. CONST. art. II, §1, cl. 2; see also Bush II, 531 U.S. at 104 ("[T]he state legislature's power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary." (emphasis added)). 31. At the time of the Founding, most States did not appoint electors through popular statewide elections. In the first presidential election, six of the ten States that appointed electors did so by direct legislative appointment. McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 29-30 (1892). 32. In the second presidential election, nine of the fifteen States that appointed electors did so by direct legislative appointment. Id. at 30. 33. In the third presidential election, nine of sixteen States that appointed electors did so by direct legislative appointment. Id. at 31. This practice persisted in lesser degrees through the Election of 1860. Id. at 32. 34. Though "[h]istory has now favored the voter," Bush II, 531 U.S. at 104, "there is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power [of appointing presidential electors] at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated." McPherson, 146 U.S. at 35 (emphasis added); cf. 3 U.S.C. § 2 ("Whenever any State has held an election for the 14 purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct."). 35. This Court has stated that "[m]ore recently, the Court has suggested that perhaps not all claims under the Guarantee Clause present nonjusticiable political questions." New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 185 (1992). The acts of non- legislative officials in the Defendant States abrogating state election law indisputably "pose . . . realistic risk of altering the form or the method of functioning of[their States'] governments." Id. at 186. In fact, the Article II violations go to the very heart of a Republican form of government. 36. As Justice Thomas stated in his dissent in United States Term.Limits v. Thorton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995): Our system of government rests on one overriding principle: All power stems from the consent of the people. To phrase the principle in this way, however, is to be imprecise about something important to the notion of `reserved' powers. The ultimate source of the Constitution's authority is the consent of the people of each individual State, not the consent of the undifferentiated people of the Nation as a whole. Id. at 846 (Thomas, J., dissenting, with the Chief Justice and Justices O'Connor and Scalia joining). 37. The Constitution is a voluntary compact among the people of the States. When the Defendant 15 States disregarded the Constitution in a manner as fundamental to our republican form of government as is Article II here, the United States is required to under Article IV to step in and enforce the Constitution against such unlawful acts. 38. Independently, a government implemented through a stolen election is not a republican form of government. The failure of the United States to prevent the electoral manipulations by the Defendant States (and other States), also violated Article IV because that failure "risk[s] . . . altering the form or the method of functioning of [all States'] governments." New York v. United States, 505 U.S. at 185; see also Erwin Chemerinsky, Cases Under the Guarantee Clause Should Be Justiciable, 65 COLO. L. REV. 849, 868 (1994) ("[T]he key features of a republican form of government are a right to vote and a right of political participation."). 39.. Given the State legislatures' constitutional primacy in selecting presidential electors, the ability to set rules governing the casting of ballots and counting of votes cannot be usurped by other branches of state government. 40. Defendant States' applicable laws are set out under the facts for each Defendant State. FACTS 41. In December 2018, the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project and MIT Election Data & Science Lab issued a comprehensive report 16 addressing election integrity issues.5 The fundamental question they sought to address was: "How do we know that the election outcomes announced by election officials are correct?" 42. tre , Caltech/MIT Report concludedi "Ultimately, the only way to answer a question like this is to rely on procedures that independently review the outcomes of elections, to detect and correct material mistakes that are discovered. In other words, elections need to be audited." Id. at iii. The Caltech/MIT Report then set forth a detailed analysis of why and how such audits should be done for the same reasons that exist today—a lack of trust in our voting systems. 43. The constitutional violations committed by Defendant States and the federal defendants directly affected the outcome of the Electoral College vote. Those violations proximately caused the appointment of presidential electors for Mr. Biden and the improper certification of his election. The uncontrolled use of mail-in ballots in 2020 made widespread election fraud inevitable. 44. The use of absentee and mail-in ballots skyrocketed in 2020, not only as a purported public- health response to the COVID-19 pandemic but also at the urging of mail-in voting's proponents, and most especially executive branch officials in Defendant States. According to the Pew Research Center, in the 2020 general election, a record number of votes- 5 See Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project, Summary Report, Election Auditing, Key Issues and Perspectives (2018) (Tab 3). 17 about 65 million—were cast via mail compared to 33.5 million mail-in ballots cast in the 2016 general election—an increase of more than 94 percent. In the wake of the contested 2000 election, the bipartisan Jimmy Carter-James Baker commission identified absentee ballots as"the largest source of potential voter fraud." BUILDING CONFIDENCE IN U.S. ELECTIONS: REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON FEDERAL ELECTION REFORM, at 46 (Sept. 2005). 46. Concern over the use of mail-in ballots is not novel to the modern era, Dustin Waters, Mail-in Ballots Were Part of a Plot to Deny Lincoln Reelection in 1864, WASH. POST(Aug. 22, 2020),6 and it remained a concern leading up to the November 2020 election. Crawford v. Marion Cty. Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181, 194-96 & n.11 (2008); see also Texas Office of the Attorney General, AG Paxton Announces Joint Prosecution of Gregg County Organized Election Fraud in Mail-In Balloting Scheme (Sept. 24, 2020); Harriet Alexander & Ariel Zilber, Minneapolis police opens investigation into reports that Ilhan. Omar's supporters illegally harvested Democrat ballots in Minnesota, DAILY MAIL, Sept. 28, 2020. 47. Absentee and mail-in voting are the primary opportunities for unlawful ballots to be cast in scale. As a result of the explosion in absentee and mail-in voting in Defendant States, combined with Defendant States' unconstitutional modification of 6 https://www.washingtonpost.com/historv/2020/08/22/mail- in-voting-civil-war-election-conspiracy-lincoln/(last visited Nov. 23, 2021). 18 statutory protections designed to ensure election integrity, Defendant States created a massive opportunity for fraud. In addition, Defendant States made it difficult or impossible to separate the constitutionally tainted mail-in ballots from valid mail-in ballots. 48. Rather than augment safeguards against illegal voting in anticipation of the millions of additional mail-in ballots flooding into their States, Defendant States all materially weakened, or did away with, security measures, such as witness or signature verification procedures, and prohibitions on unmanned ballot drop boxes, required by their respective legislatures. Their legislatures established those commonsense safeguards to prevent—or at least reducc fraudulent mail-in ballots. 49. Significantly, in Defendant States, Democrat voters voted by mail at two to three times the rate of Republicans. Mr. Biden thus greatly benefited from this unconstitutional usurpation of legislative authority, and the weakening of legislatively mandated ballot security measures. Electronic voting systems are inherently vulnerable to hacking and manipulation. 50. In addition to the unconstitutional acts associated with mail-in and absentee voting, there are grave issues surrounding the vulnerability of electronic voting machines—such as the electronic voting systems provided by Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. ("Dominion") and Election Systems & Software ("ES&S")that were in use in all of the Defendant 19 States (and other states as well) during the November 2020 election. 51. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") designated election infrastructure as critical infrastructure pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 5195c. See Curling v. Kemp, 334 F. Supp. 3d 1303, 1311 (N.D. Ga. 2018). The United States thus formally articulated its duty to protect the Nation's election systems. 52. On November 12, 2020, after the November 2020 election, members of Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & The Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees issued a joint statement declaring that "[t]he November 3rd election was the most secure in American history." The purveyors of this statement provided no support for this bald-faced assertion. 53. In an ironic twist, four weeks later, on December 13, 2020, the U.S. Government announced the largest cyberattack in the Country's history affecting more than 18,000 public and private organizations—including at least one voting machine company. 54. As Plaintiffs expert, Col. John Mills (USAR Ret.), a former Director of Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Senior Civilian possessing almost 40 years of experience in the planning and use of U.S. cybersecurity-related instruments of national power testifies: • The United States Government has the capability to project significant effects toward 20 critical infrastructure worldwide—including election systems. This same capability now exists in other countries, such as China, Russian, Iran, and Venezuela, and these foreign powers now use these same, similar, and improved 'remote access operation methodologies at will to assert their own national agendas. • These operations have created a growing talent base of personnel, software, and network- enabled, remote-access capabilities that are becoming ubiquitous in the hands of companies and personnel outside of the U.S. Government. • Statements that the November 2020 election was "the most secure in American history" asserted in a November 12, 2020, posted on the CISA website, had little, if any, basis in fact. Declaration of Col.John R. Mills, ¶¶ 9 -14(USAR Ret.) (Tab 4). 55. Further highlighting the extreme risk of manipulation of our electronic voting systems is the public testimony of renowned cyber security expert, University of Michigan Professor J. Alex Halderman. On June 21, 2017, he testified to the United States Senate Intelligence Committee on how easy it is to hack electronic voting systems to change the outcome of a national election. 56. The following statement by Professor Halderman at this hearing is startling: 21 w.dn..d.,y • RUSSIAN HACKING AU S ELECTIONS _ J.ALEX HALDERMAN C SPAN2 University of Michigan e-eseen•sro Computer Science and Enineeri Professor rr.ean My conclusion from that work is that our highly computerized election infrastructure is vulnerable to sabotage and even to cyber attacks that could change votes. These realities risk making our election results more difficult for the American people to trust. ... I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly as part of a decade of research studying the technology that operates elections and learning how to make it stronger. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine, like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes. ... This puts the entire Nation at risk. In close elections, an attacker can probe the most important swing states or swing counties, find areas with the weakest protection, and strike there. In a close election year, changing a 22 few votes in key localities could be enough to tip national results. Russian Interference in the 2016 U.S. Elections: Hearing before the Sen. Select Comm. on Intelligence, 115th Cong.,72 (2017). Professor Halderman's entire introductory remarks can be seen at the link in the footnote below. 57. On September 21, 2021 Prof. Halderman filed a declaration in Curling v. Raffensperger, No. 1:17-cv-2989-AT (N.D. Ga.), requesting that the district court unseal his July 1, 2021 25,000-word expert report (the "Report") stating under the penalty of perjury, that the hacking/malware threat to Dominion voting machines used in 16 states is so "urgent" that his Report must be released to CISA to try to fix these issues, and that CISA has acknowledged that it is prepared to do so.8 58. Prof. Halderman testified that "These are not general weaknesses or theoretical problems but rather specific flaws in [Dominion's] ICX software and I am prepared to demonstrate proof-of-concept malware that can exploit them to steal votes." Id. 59. Prof. Halderman also testified that: "Informing responsible parties about the [Dominion] ICX's vulnerabilities is becoming more urgent by the day. Foreign or domestic adversaries who are intent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmivIHUAy8Q (opening testimony at 2:15:15 to 2:21:15) (last visited Nov. 23, 2021). 8 See Declaration of J.Alex Halderman(Tab 5).The 16 states are: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada New Jersey, Ohio,Pennsylvania,Tennessee, and Washington.Id. at¶5 23 on attacking elections certainly could have already discovered the same problems I did." Id. 60. Prof. Halderman testified that Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger is refusing to address these issues and, along with the other defendant Georgia county election officials, has objected to disclosing his Report just to CISA leaving Prof. Halderman to state that "continuing to conceal [these] problems . . . serves no one and only hurts voters." Id. (emphasis added). The State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 61. Arizona has 11 electoral votes, with a state-wide vote tally 1,661,686 for Mr. Trump and 1,672,143 for Mr. Biden, a margin of 10,457 votes. 62. The number of illegal votes and votes affected by the various constitutional violations far exceeds the margin of votes separating the candidates. 1. Arizona's election violated the Electors' Clause. 63. Since 1990, Arizona law has required that residents wishing to participate in an election submit their voter registration materials no later than n9 days prior to election day in order to vote in that election. Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16-120(A). For 2020, that deadline was October 5. 64. Such deadlines are permissible: "State is certainly justified in imposing some reasonable cutoff point for registration ... which citizens must meet in 24 order to participate in the next election." Rosario v. Rockefeller, 410 U.S. 752, 760 (1973). 65. In Mi, Familia Vota v. Hobbs, 492 F. Supp. 3d 980 (D. Ariz. 2020), however, a federal district court violated the Electors Clause and enjoined that law, extending the registration deadline to October 23, 2020. The Ninth Circuit stayed that order on October 13, 2020, with a two-day grace period, Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs, 977 F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2020). 66. Nonetheless, the Ninth Circuit did not apply the stay retroactively because neither the Arizona Secretary of State nor the Arizona Attorney General requested retroactive relief. Id. at 954-55. As a net result, the deadline was unconstitutionally extended from the statutory deadline of October 5 to October 15, 2021, thereby allowing more than 52,000 registrations in violation of Arizona law. Brahm Resnik, Court cuts off extension of Arizona voter registration on Thursday, 12 NEWS, Oct. 13, 2020.9 2. Audits of Maricopa County found outcome-determinative numbers of unlawful votes. 67. In addition the foregoing purely legal Electors Clause violation, audits of the 2020 election results in Maricopa County discovered evidence of outcome-determinative discrepancies and fraud. 9 https://www.l2news.com/article/news/politics/elections/court- cuts-off-extension-of-arizona-voter-registration-after-2-more- days/75-86c59dfb-2950-4fea-89aa-6c38542blOde (last visited Nov. 23,2021). 25 68. On December 15, 2020, the Arizona State senate served two subpoenas on the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (the "Maricopa Board") to audit scanned ballots, voting machines, and software based on voting irregularities. The Arizona Senate Judiciary Chairman stated in a public hearing earlier that day that "[t]here is evidence of tampering, there is evidence of fraud" with vote in Maricopa County. 69. Rather than comply with the subpoenas, the Maricopa Board fought the subpoenas in state court, which resulted in the issuance of two new, superseding subpoenas on January 12, 2021. Although the Maricopa Board complied in part, it continued to seek to withhold the balance of the subpoenaed election materials (e.g., ballots, voting equipment) needed to audit election results. 70. Although the Arizona Senate prevailed on the lawfulness of the subpoenas, Maricopa Cty. v. Fann, No. CV 2020-016840 (Maricopa Cty. Super. Ct. Feb. 25, 2021), the Maricopa Board and other County officials continued to obstruct the audit and withheld materials covered by the subpoenas (e.g., splunk logs, routers, and equipment) that could determine the extent of internet connectedness or intrusions. 71. After the Maricopa County Superior Court upheld the issuance of the operative subpoenas, on March 3, 2021, someone using an administrative account from a valid local network address accessed Maricop a County's Election Management System ("EMS") server and executed a script 37,686 times, with each execution resulting on the overwriting of one entry in the EMS server's security log (i.e., the log 26 has a fixed capacity, and each new entry displaced the oldest entry), thereby destroying evidence of the network accesses to the EMS during the 2020 election. 72. The Arizona Senate engaged systems and cybersecurity firms to audit the election materials produced by the County using forensic methods that exceed the type of hand recount typically conducted in close elections. Unlike a forensic audit, a recount would not detect fraud in the same way that recounting the money in a cash register would not detect whether a business had been passed counterfeit currency. 73. On September 24, 2021, the forensic auditors presented their reports to the Arizona State Senate in both written form and testimony. 74. The forensic auditors found numerous anomalies and outcome-determinative discrepancies with the Maricopa County election materials made available to them, including: • 255,326 ballots included in the "final voted file" (the "VM55" file) as having voted early that were not included in the "early voting returns file" (the "EV33" file), when the EV33 file should have an entry for each early vote cast (whether by mail or in person) with the details as to when and how that vote was cast; • F3,344 mail-in ballots cast when the registered voter had moved and where no one with the same surname remained at the address; • 6,295 instances of multiple ballots from the same person; 27 • 3,432 more votes in the official results than in the final-voted ("VM55") file; • 2,592 more duplicate ballots than ballots sent for duplication; • 1,528 voters who had moved to another state; • 618 votes by persons not on the official precinct register 10 days prior to election; • 397 mail-in ballots returned without any record of a ballot having been sent to the voter; • 282 registered voters who died before October 5, 2020, and nonetheless voted; • 198 votes by persons who registered after the cut-off date for registering to vote in the 2020 election. Cyber Ninjas, Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit, vol. III, at 6, 51, 10, 12-14, 20-21, 25-26, 29-30, 34-36 (Sept. 24, 2021) (Tab 20). 75. Although Maricopa County withholding the router, Splunk, and NetFlow data prevented an audit of all internet connections with the Maricopa County election system, the audit network auditors did find evidence of internet activity in unallocated space—i.e., portions of deleted files—on the Maricopa County election systems dated after the installation of the Dominion voting software suite on August 6, 2020. This finding proves that Maricopa County's claim that its election systems were not connected to the internet is false. 76. The forensic auditors were unable to determine whether votes or results had been electronically altered from the materials initially provided because Maricopa County officials withheld 28 or overwrote equipment and data that would allow forensic auditors to determine whether intrusions had—or had not—occurred and, if so, from where those intrusions came. 77. In addition, A. V. Shiva Ayyadurai, Ph.D., analyzed signatures from the images of early- voting ballot envelopes that Maricopa County provided to the Arizona Senate. His findings included the following anomalies and outcome-determinative discrepancies from an analysis of the signature regions of the 1,929,240 early-voting ballot ("EVB") return envelope images provided: • t7,322 duplicate mail-in voting early ballots by 17,126 voters who voted twice (16,934 voters), thrice (188 voters), or four times (4 voters); • 9,589 fewer EVB return envelopes identified as even having a signature than Maricopa County submitted for signature verification; • A 59.7% decrease in the number of EVB return envelopes rejected as having a signature mismatch versus the 2016 election, notwithstanding that the number of EVB return envelopes increased 52.6% from 2016 to 2020; • ,545 fewer EVB ieturn envelope images made available than reported by Maricopa County's canvass report on the 2020 general election; • 2,580 "scribbles" in the signature region— which would indicate a "bad signature" if a review were commissioned to analyze signatures—when Maricopa County reported having rejected only 587 "bad signature" EVB 29 return envelopes in its canvass report on the 2020 general election; • 464 more "no signature" EVB return envelopes—a total of 1,919—when Maricopa County reported having rejected only 1,455 "no signature" EVB return envelopes in its canvass report on the 2020 general election. A. V. Shiva Ayyadurai, Ph.D., Pattern Recognition Classification of Early Voting Ballot (EVB) Return Envelope Images for Signature Presence Detection: An Engineering Systems Approach to Identify Anomalies to Advance the Integrity of US. Election Processes, at 62, 88-89 (Sept. 24, 2021) (Tab 21). 78. Based on his review of signature region on the EVB return envelopes, Dr. Shiva concluded that a full audit(e.g.,'bomparing the signature on EVB return envelope images with voters' signatures from voter registration files) of the Maricopa signature- verification process is needed. The State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 79. Georgia has 16 electoral votes, with a statewide vote tally of 2,461,854 for Mr. Trump and 2,473,633 for Mr. Biden, a margin of approximately 11,779 votes. 80. The number of illegal votes and votes affected by the various constitutional violations far exceeds the margin of votes separating the candidates. 30 1. The violations of Article II in Georgia resulted in outcome-determinative numbers of unlawful votes. 81. In July 2020, Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger and the Georgia State Election Board, without legislative approval as required under Georgia's Constitution, authorized the use of 300 absentee ballot drop boxes beginning 49 days before the November 2020 election. Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14 Secure Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes. 82. Under this Rule, each of Georgia's 159 counties is responsible for documenting the transfer of every batch of absentee ballots picked up at drop boxes and delivered to the county election offices with ballot transfer forms. the forms are required to be signed and dated, with time of pick up by the collection team upon pick up, and then signed, dated, with time of delivery by the registrar or designee upon receipt and accepted. i33. As of April 2021, officials at the state and county level in Georgia have failed to produce chain of custody records for more than 355,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes located around the state for that election. 84. In addition, Georgia's Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia's statutes governing the date a ballot may be opened, and the signature verification process for absentee ballots. 85. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-386(a)(2) prohibits the opening of absentee ballots until after the polls open on Election Day. In April 2020, however, the State Election Board adopted Secretary of State Rule 183-1- 31 14-0.9-.15, Processing Ballots Prior to Election Day. That rule purports to authorize county election officials to begin processing absentee ballots up to three weeks before Election Day. Outside parties were then given early and illegal access to purportedly defective ballots to "cure" them in violation of O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-386(a)(1)(C), 21-2-419(c)(2). 86. Specifically, Georgia law authorizes and requires a single registrar or clerk—after reviewing the outer envelope—to reject an absentee ballot if: the voter failed to sign the required oath or to provide the required information; the signature appears invalid or the required information does not conform with the information on file; or if the voter is otherwise found ineligible to vote. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-386(a)(1)(B)-(C). 87. Georgia law provides absentee voters the chance to "cure a failure to sign the oath, an invalid signature, or missing information" on a ballot's outer envelope by the deadline for verifying provisional ballots (i.e., three days after the election). O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-386(a)(1)(C), 21-2-419(c)(2). To facilitate cures, Georgia law requires the relevant election official to notify the voter in writing: "The board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk shall promptly notify the elector of such rejection, a copy of which notification shall be retained in the files of the board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk for at least two years." O.C.G.A. § 21-2-386(a)(1)(B). 88. There were 284,817 early ballots corrected and accepted in Georgia out of 4,018,064 early ballots used to vote in Georgia. Mr. Biden received nearly twice the number of mail-in votes as 32 Mr. Trump and thus materially benefited from this unconstitutional change in Georgia's election laws. 89. In addition, on March 6, 2020, in Democratic Party of Georgia v. Raffensperger, No. 1:19-cv-5028-WMR (N.D. Ga.), Georgia's Secretary of State, a non-legislative actor, entered a Compromise Settlement Agreement and Release with the Democratic Party of Georgia (the "Settlement") to materially change the legislature's statutory requirements for reviewing signatures on absentee ballot envelopes to confirm the voter's identity by making it far more difficult to challenge defective signatures beyond the express mandatory procedures set forth at GA. CODE § 21-2-386(a)(1)(B). 90. Among other things, before a ballot could be rejected, the Settlement required a registrar who found a defective signature to now seek a review by two other registrars, and only if a majority of the registrars agreed that the signature was defective could the ballot be rejected but not before all three registrars' names were written on the ballot envelope along with the reason for the rejection. These cumbersome procedures are in direct conflict with Georgia's statutory requirements, as is the Settlement's requirement that notice be provided by telephone (i.e., not in writing) if a telephone number is available. Finally, the Settlement purports to require State election officials to consider issuing guidance and training materials drafted by an expert retained by the Democratic Party of Georgia. 91. Georgia's legislature has not ratified these material purported changes to statutory law mandated by the Compromise Settlement Agreement 33 and Release, including altered signature verification requirements and early opening of ballots. The relevant legislation that was violated by the Compromise Settlement Agreement and Release did not include a severability clause. 92. This unconstitutional purported change in Georgia law materially benefitted Mr. Biden. According to the Georgia Secretary of State's office, Mr. Biden had almost double the number of absentee votes (65.32%) as Mr. Trump (34.68%). 93. The effect of this unconstitutional change in Georgia election law, which made it more likely that ballots without matching signatures would be counted, had a material impact on the outcome of the election. 94. Specifically, there were 1,305,659 absentee mail-in ballots submitted in Georgia in 2020. There were 4,786 absentee ballots rejected in 2020. This is a rejection irate of .37%. In contrast, in 2016, the 2016 rejection rate was 6.42% with 13,677 absentee mail-in ballots being rejected out of 213,033 submitted, which is more than seventeen times greater than in 2020. 95. If the rejection rate of mailed-in absentee ballots remained the same in 2020 as it was in 2016, there would be 83,517 fewer tabulated ballots in 2020. The statewide split of absentee ballots was 34.68% for Trump and 65.2% for Biden. Rejecting at the higher 2016 rate with the 2020 split between Trump and Biden would decrease Trump votes by 28,965 and Biden votes by 54,552, which would be a net gain for Trump of 25,587 votes. This would be more than needed to overcome the Biden advantage of 11,779 34 votes. Regardless of the number of ballots affected, however, the non-legislative changes to the election rules violated the Electors Clause. 2. Georgia's use of electronic voting machines opened the door to electronic manipulation of the vote. 96. In addition, Georgia uses Dominion's electronic voting machines throughout the State. Less than a month before the election, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ruled on a motion brought by a citizen advocate group and others seeking a preliminary injunction to stop Georgia from using Dominion's voting systems due to their known vulnerabilities to hacking and other irregularities. See Curling v. Raffensperger, 493 F. Supp. 3d 1264 (N.D. Ga. 2020) ("Curling"). 97. Though the district court found that it was bound by Eleventh Circuit law to deny plaintiffs' motion, it issued a prophetic warning stating: The Court's Order has delved deep into the true risks posed by the new BMD voting system as well as its manner of implementation. These risks are neither hypothetical nor remote under the current circumstances. The insularity of the Defendants' and Dominion's stance here in evaluation and management of the security and vulnerability of the BMD system does not benefit the public or citizens' confident exercise of the franchise. The stealth vote alteration or operational interference risks posed by 35 malware that can be effectively invisible to detection, whether intentionally seeded or not, are high once implanted, if equipment and software systems are not properly protected, implemented, and audited. 493 F. Supp. 3d at 1341 (emphasis added). 98. In a November 4, 2020, video interview, Fulton County, Georgia Director of Elections, Richard Barron, stated that the tallied vote of over 93% of ballots were based on a "review [panel's]" determination of the voter's "intent"—not what the voter actually voted. Specifically, he stated that"so far we've scanned 113,130 ballots, we've adjudicated over 106,000. . . . The only ballots that are adjudicated are if we have a ballot with a contest on it in which there's some question as to how the computer reads it so that the vote review panel then determines voter intent."to There is no way to know whether that vast number of ballots were accurately adjudicated in that short period of time to reflect the true vote. 99. This astounding figure demonstrates how easy it is for election officials to use electronic voting systems to modify votes on a massive scale with no oversight. These figures, in and of themselves in this one sample, far exceeds the margin of votes separating the two candidates in Georgia. 100. On November 9, 2021, a voting rights group, VoterGA, announced that 56 Georgia counties admitted that most or all of the images created 10 https://www.c-span.org/video/?477819-1/fulton-county- georgia-election-update (last visited Nov. 23, 2021) (from 0:20 through 1:21). 36 automatically by the Dominion voting system for results tabulation have been destroyed, and that a total of 74 Georgia counties have been unable to produce all the original ballot images from the November 2020 election. 101. For example, VoterGA sent an open records act request to Fulton County for an "[e]lectronic Copy of all original Election Day ballot images for the November 3rd, 2020 election." The County responded: I recall our conversation and I appreciate you emailing me your requests. I can confirm that the County maintains no records which are responsive to your request. The answer is the same for both the request contained in this email as well as the email you just sent seeking "Electronic Copy of the approximately 315,000 original In-Person Advance Voting ballot images for the November 3rd, 2020 election". The County maintains nothing responsive." 102. Thus, Fulton County apparently destroyed over 350,000 ballot images—the only records which can show the authenticity of the ballot cast such as through the proof of date and time when cast based on metadata contained on the images. Paper ballots have no such evidence that proves their authenticity. 103. The destruction of these election records violated 52 USC § 20701, which requires a 22-month " See email from Steven Rosenberg, Fulton County Deputy County Attorney to Garland Favorito dated September 27, 2021 (Tab 6). 37 retention period for such records, and O.C.G.A. § 21- 2-73 which requires a 24-month retention period for such records. 104. In addition, Fulton County is also missing 17,690 mail-in ballots, which alone far exceeds Biden's margin of victory in Georgia. 105. The response to VoterGA's open records act request included written confirmation from Chris Harvey, then-Georgia Election Director, granting permission to erase in-person ballot images from the memory cards.i2 The destruction of these election records violated 52 USC § 20701, and O.C.G.A. § 21- 2-73 as described, supra. 3. The Georgia Senate Election Law Study Subcommittee found numerous outcome determinative numbers of unlawful votes and concluded the election results "must be viewed as untrustworthy." 106. On December 17, 2020, Georgia State Senator William Ligon—the Chairman of the Election Law Study Subcommittee of the Georgia Standing Senate Judiciary Committee—issued a detailed report discussing a myriad of voting irregularities and potential fraud in the Georgia 2020 general election (the "Report") (Tab 8). The Executive Summary states that "[t]he November 3, 2020 General Election (the `Election') was chaotic and any reported results must be viewed as untrustworthy". 12 See email from State Election Director Chris Harvey dated December 2, 2020 (Tab 7). 38 107. The Subcommittee unanimously approved the Report in a subsequent hearing on election fraud held on December 30, 2020. During that hearing investigating fraud, an expert on Dominion voting systems, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, demonstrated in real-time that a Dominion poll pad could be hacked due to the fact that it was connected to the internet. 108. On January 2, 2021, Sen. Ligon, sent then-President Trump a letter requesting a forensic audit of the Dominion voting machines and ballots under DHS Cyber Hunt and Incident Response Teams Act of 2019. In his letter, Senator Ligon based his request in part on the following: • The Dominion voting machines employed in Fulton County had an astounding 93.67% error rate in the scanning of ballots requiring some unknown "review panel" to "adjudicate" i.e. "determine" the voter's intent in over 106,000 ballots out of a total 113,130 ballots. • Tens of thousands of votes were switched from Trump to Biden in several Georgia counties in Georgia. For example, in Bibb County, Trump had 29,391 votes at 9:11 pm EST while simultaneously Biden had 17,218 votes. Minutes later at the next update, these vote numbers switched and Trump had 17,218 votes and Biden had 29,391 votes—a switch of 12,173 votes in Biden's favor. Letter, Sen. William Ligon, Georgia State Senate, to Donald J. Trump (Jan. 2, 2021) (Tab 9). 39 The State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 109. Michigan has 16 electoral votes, with a statewide vote tally of 2,649,852 for Mr. Trump and 2,804,040 for Mr. Biden, a margin of 154,188 votes. 110. The number of votes affected by the various constitutional violations exceeds the margin of votes dividing the candidates. 1. The violations of Article II in Michigan resulted in outcome- determinative numbers of unlawful votes. 111. Michigan's then-Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification. Michigan's legislature has not ratified these changes, and its election laws do not include a severability clause. 112. As amended in 2018, the Michigan Constitution provides all registered voters the right to request and vote by an absentee ballot without giving a reason. MICH. CONST. art. 2, § 4. 113. On May 19, 2020, however, Secretary Benson announced that her office would send unsolicited absentee-voter ballot applications by mail to all 7.7 million registered Michigan voters prior to the primary and general elections. Although her office repeatedly encouraged voters to vote absentee because of the COVID-19 pandemic, it did not ensure that Michigan's election systems and procedures were adequate to ensure the accuracy and legality of the 40 historic flood of mail-in votes. In fact, it did the opposite and did away with protections designed to deter voter fraud. 114. Secretary Benson's flooding of Michigan with millions of absentee ballot applications prior to the 2020 general election violated M.C.L. § 168.759(3). That statute limits the procedures for requesting an absentee ballot to three specified ways: An application for an absent voter ballot under this section may be made in any of the following ways: (a) By a written request signed by the voter. (b) On an absent voter ballot application form provided for that purpose by the clerk of the city or township. (c) On a federal postcard application. M.C.L. § 168.759(3) (emphasis added). 115. The Michigan Legislature thus declined to include the Secretary of State as a means for distributing absentee ballot applications. Id. § 168.759(3)(b). Under the statute's plain language, the Legislature explicitly gave only local clerks the power to distribute absentee voter ballot applications. Id. 116. Because the Legislature declined to explicitly include the Secretary of State as a vehicle for distributing absentee ballots applications, Secretary Benson lacked authority to distribute even a single absentee voter ballot application—much less the millions of absentee ballot applications Secretary Benson chose to flood across Michigan. 117. Secretary Benson also violated Michigan law when she launched a program in June 2020 41 allowing absentee ballots to be requested online, without signature verification as expressly required under Michigan law. The Michigan Legislature did not approve or authorize Secretary Benson's unilateral actions. 118. MCL§ 168.759(4) states in relevant part: "An applicant for an absent voter ballot shall sign the application. Subject to section 761(2), a clerk or assistant clerk shall not deliver an absent voter ballot to an applicant who does not sign the application." 119. Further, MCL § 168.761(2) states in relevant part: "The qualified voter file must be used to determine the genuineness of a signature on an application for an absent voter ballot", and if "the signatures do not agree sufficiently or [if] the signature is missing" the ballot must be rejected. 120. On October 6, 2020, Secretary Benson issued "guidance" to local election clerks in the form of a document entitled "Absent Voter Ballot Processing: Signature Verification and Voter Notification Standards." This document mirrored guidance Benson had previously issued. The stated purpose of this document was to"provide[] standards" for reviewing signatures, verifying signatures, and curing missing or mismatched signatures. 121. Under the heading entitled "Procedures for Signature Verification," the document states that signature review "begins with the presumption that" the signature on an absent voter ballot application or envelope is valid. Further, the document instructs clerks to, if there are "any redeeming qualities in the [absent voter] application or return envelope 42 signature as compared to the signature on file, treat the signature as valid." 122. The section on signature-verification procedures repeats the notion that "clerks should presume that a voter's [absent voter] application or envelope signature is his or her genuine signature, as there are several acceptable reasons that may cause an apparent mismatch." Finally, the document concludes, that clerks "must perform their signature verification duties with the presumption that the voter's [absent voter] application or envelope signature is his or her genuine signature." 123. On March 9, 2021, the Michigan Court of Claims ruled that Benson's disregard of Michigan's statutory signature verifications requirements and procedures in her instructions to Michigan's election clerks were unlawful. Genetski v. Benson, Case No. 20- 000216-MM, slip op. at 14 (Mich. Ct. Claims,March 9,2021) (stating "the standards issued by defendant Benson on October 6, 2020, with respect to signature- matching requirements amounted to a `rule' [and] is invalid.") (Tab 10). 124. Nonetheless, the damage caused by Benson's unlawful disregard of Michigan's statutory signature verifications requirements and procedures was done. In 2016 only 587,618 Michigan voters requested absentee ballots. In stark contrast, in 2020, 3.2 million votes were cast by absentee ballot, about 57% of total votes cast —and more than five times the number of ballots even requested in 2016. 125. Secretary Benson's unconstitutional modifications of Michigan's election rules resulted in the distribution of millions of absentee ballot 43 applications without verifying voter signatures as required by MCL §§ 168.759(4) and 168.761(2). This means that millions of absentee ballots were disseminated in violation of Michigan's statutory signature-verification requirements. Democrats in Michigan voted by mail at a ratio of approximately two to one compared to Republican voters. Thus, Mr. Biden materially benefited from these unconstitutional changes to Michigan's election law. 126. In sum, the non-legislative modifications to Michigan's election statutes, and other discrepancies, resulted in a number of constitutionally tainted votes that far exceeds the margin of voters separating the candidates in Michigan. Regardless of the number of votes that were affected by the unconstitutional modification of Michigan's election rules, the non-legislative changes to the election rules violated the Electors Clause 2. Election officials' illegal acts in Wayne County resulted in outcome determinative numbers of unlawful votes. 127. Michigan also requires that poll watchers and inspectors have access to vote counting and canvassing. M.C.L. §§ 168.674-.675. 128. Michigan also has strict signature verification requirements for absentee ballots, including that the Elections Department place a written statement or stamp on each ballot envelope where the voter signature is placed, indicating that the voter signature was in fact checked and verified 44 with the signature on file with the State. See MCL § 168.765a(6). 129. Local election officials in Wayne County made a conscious and express policy decision not to follow M.C.L. §§ 168.674-.675 for the opening, counting, and recording of absentee ballots. Wayne County made the policy decision to ignore Michigan's statutory signature-verification requirements for absentee ballots. Mr. Biden received approximately 587,074, or 68%, of the votes cast there compared to Mr. Trump's receiving approximate 264,149, or 30.59%, of the total vote. Thus, Mr. Biden materially benefited from these unconstitutional changes to Michigan's election law. 130. In addition, numerous poll challengers and an Election Department employee whistleblower have testified that the signature verification requirement was ignored in Wayne County. For example, Jesse Jacob, a decades-long City of Detroit employee assigned to work in the Elections Department for the 2020 election testified that: Absentee ballots that were received in the mail would have the voter's signature on the envelope. While I was at the TCF Center, I was instructed not to look at any of the signatures on the absentee ballots, and I was instructed not to compare the signature on the absentee ballot with the signature on file. Affidavit of Jessy Jacob, at 1115 (Tab 11). 131. In fact, a poll challenger, Lisa Gage, testified that not a single one of the several hundred to a thousand ballot envelopes she observed had a 45 written statement or stamp indicating the voter signature had been verified at the TCF Center in accordance with MCL § 168.765a(6).13 132. The TCF was the only facility within Wayne County authorized to count ballots for the City of Detroit. 133. In addition, a member of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers ("Canvassers Board"), William Hartman, determined that 71% of Detroit's Absent Voter Counting Boards ("AVCBs") were unbalanced—i.e., the number of people who checked in did not match the number of ballots cast—without explanation. Affidavit of William Hartman at¶ 6 (Tab 12). 134. On November 17, 2020, the Canvassers Board deadlocked 2-2 over whether to certify the results of the presidential election based on numerous reports of fraud and unanswered material discrepancies in the county-wide election results. A few hours later, the Republican Board members reversed their decision and voted to certify the results after severe harassment, including threats of violence. See Affidavit of William Hartman at It 18-19 (Tab 12), and Affidavit of Monica Palmer at ¶¶ 27-28 (Tab 13). 135. The following day, the two Republican members of the Board rescinded their votes to certify the vote and signed affidavits alleging they were bullied and misled into approving election results and do not believe the votes should be certified until serious irregularities in Detroit votes are resolved. 13 Affidavit of Lisa Gage¶ 17(Tab 14). 46 136. On February 5, 2021, a news outlet called The Gateway Pundit revealed video footage from security cameras at the TCF Center it had received the prior week in connection with an open records request.14 That video footage confirmed witness testimony that there were at least 50 mailbox bins of ballots unloaded at 3:30 am on November 4, 2020, in the back of the TCF Center, well after the 8:00 pm deadline for ballots cast. There were no poll watchers present nor was there any formal chain of custody observed to know when these ballots were cast or where the ballots came from. 3. A"glitch" in electronic voting machines in Antrim County wrongly awarding 6,000 votes to Mr. Biden. 137. Lastly, on November 4, 2020, Michigan election officials in Antrim County admitted that a purported "glitch" in Dominion voting machines caused 6,000 votes for Mr. Trump to be wrongly switched to Mr. Biden in just one county. Local officials discovered the so-called "glitch" after reportedly questioning Mr. Biden's win in the heavily Republican area and manually checked the vote tabulation. 14 Jim Hoft,Exclusive:The TCF Center Election Fraud—Newly Discovered Video Shows Late Night Deliveries of Tens of Thousands of Illegal Ballots 8 Hours After Deadline, THE GATEWAY PUNDIT, Feb. 5, 2021, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/exclusive-tcf- center-election-fraud-newly-recovered-video-shows-late-night- deliveries-tens-thousands-illegal-ballots-michigan-arena/ (last visited Nov. 23, 2021). 47 138. In Bailey v. Antrim. County et al., Case No. 20-9238-CZ, cyber security expert, Benjamin R. Cotton, submitted an affidavit detailing his examination of, inter alia, the Dominion ICX system and the ES&S server used in the November 2020 election. What he found was shocking. 139. Specifically, Mr. Cotton found an IP address on the Dominion ICX machine that resolved to an address in Taiwan, and that the system was actively configured to communicate on a private network. Cotton concluded that "1) the device has been actively used for network communications, and 2) that this device has communicated to public IP addresses not located in the United States." Affidavit of Ben Cotton (Tab 15). The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 140. Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes, with a statewide vote tally of 3,377,654 for Mr. Trump and 3,458,229 for Mr. Biden, a margin of 80,575 votes. 141. The number of illegal votes and votes affected by the various constitutional violations far exceeds the margin of votes separating the candidates. 1. Pennsylvania's voter registration system can be easily hacked and manipulated. 142. Pennsylvania is one of a handful of states that allow third party entities some type of access to voter registration systems via an application programming interface ("API"). Most states and most countries prohibit access to sensitive election data but 48 in Pennsylvania, third party organizations are not only given access to the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors ("SURE") system but they also have the ability to grant access to other "partner organizations." The registration system is thus totally vulnerable to someone adding fake registrations or illegally modifying registration data. 143. On December 13, 2019, the Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General ("DAG") issued a detailed report on its performance audit of the SURE system administered by the Pennsylvania Department of State ("DOS"). The DAG stated that the DOS obstructed its audit stating: DOS' denial of access to critical documents and excessive redaction of documentation resulted in DAG being unable to fully achieve three of the eight audit objectives. . . . This sustained refusal to cooperate with our information requests was done without DOS providing any plausible justification for their noncooperation. Accordingly, DAG was unable to establish with any degree of reasonable assurance that the SURE system is secure and that Pennsylvania voter registration records are complete, accurate, and in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and related guidelines. Letter, Eugene A. DePasquale, Pennsylvania Auditor General, to Tom Wolf, Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Dec. 13, 2019) (Tab 22). 144. The DAG's warnings have proven true. For example, tens of thousands of voters were 49 mysteriously added to the SURE system and backdated shortly before the November 2020 election. 145. Specifically, the SURE system includes a unique ID number for each registered voter. That number is proceeded by a hyphenated county code. The February 1, 2021, voter roll (the "Full Voter Export" or "FVE") contains 74,090 voters with the associated unique ID that have a registration date of April 6, 2020, or earlier-55,823 of these voters are recorded as having voted in 2020. However, the FVE dated April 6, 2020, has no record of these voters— meaning these purported 74,090 voters were inexplicably added to the SURE system and increased the voting population in the months leading up to the November 2020 election. These are not inactive voters. Inactive records are in the FVE and would have shown up in the April 6, 2020, FVE had they existed. 2. Pennsylvania's final results show 49,141 more votes than voters and the Secretary of State unlawfully certified the Pennsylvania election results. 146. Secretary Boockvar certified the election results on November 24, 2020. However, the SURE system, the official registrar of votes pursuant to 25 PA. STAT. § 1222, reflected that there were a whopping 784,752 more votes than voters. 147. Pennsylvania law expressly prohibits certifying until after the investigation of an over-vote: If . . . it shall appear that the total vote returned for any candidate or candidates for 50 the same office or nomination . . . exceeds the total number of persons who voted in said election district or the total number of ballots cast therein . . . such excess shall be deemed a discrepancy and palpable error, and shall be investigated by the return board, and no votes shall be recorded from such district until such investigation shall be had . . . . 25 PA. STAT. § 3154 (emphasis added). 148. No investigation of the 784,752 votes before certification, as required under 25 PA. STAT. § 3154, was undertaken. 149. On December 28, 2020, Boockvar tried to excuse the massive number of extra votes compared to the number of voters—still over 205,000 as of that date—by issuing a press release stating "[a]t this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system." 150. However, as of February 1, 2021, all Pennsylvania counties closed out their elections in the SURE system—meaning all counties had completed updating the voter information for the November 2020 election. The SURE system reflects that there are still 49,141 more ballots cast included in the certified vote tally, than there were voters in the November 2020 election. No explanation for this gross discrepancy has ever been given by the State. 151. As stated above, Boockvar's excuse that not all counties had finished uploading their results to the SURE system is now moot. That leaves the fact that there are at least 49,141 more confirmed votes 51 than voters demonstrating the stark illegality of the Pennsylvania election. 152. In Philadelphia County alone, 792 out of 1703 precincts (also called "districts") had more votes for President than voters who participated in the election. Those 792 precincts had a total of 346,484 votes for President. In those 792 precincts, Biden received 286,014 votes and Trump received 57,253 votes, for a net margin of 228,761 votes for Biden. Under 25 PA. STAT. § 3154, "no votes shall be recorded from such district until such investigation shall be had . . . ." No investigation into these discrepancies has been conducted. 153. Biden's margin of 228,761 votes in those 762 precincts, none of which should have been recorded, far exceeds his margin of victory in Pennsylvania. 154. In Alleghany County, 767 out of 1,323 precincts had more votes for President than voters who participated in the election. In those 767 precincts, Biden received 246,446 votes and Trump received 153,060 votes, for a net margin of 93,386 votes for Biden—which alone exceeds Biden's margin of victory. Combined with Philadelphia County, Biden received 322,147 more votes than Trump. 25 PA.STAT. § 3154 prohibited from being counted until these discrepancies were resolved. Boockvar's certification of the vote 24, 2020 violated 25 PA. STAT. § 3154, and I Ty P° is therefore void. 52 3. Pennsylvania misled this Court and continued to illegally count tens of thousands of ballots received after November 3, 2020. 155. On September 17, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court voted 4-3 that all mail- in ballots postmarked by 8:00 on Election Day, and received by 5:00 p.m. November 6, 2020, even those lacking a postmark or bearing an illegible postmark, would be counted. Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar, 238 A.3d 345 (Pa. 2020). 156. On October 19, 2020, this Court split 4-4 on whether to stay that decision by Pennsylvania Supreme Court leaving that unconstitutional decision to stand. 157. After Justice Barrett's confirmation, the Republican Party sought expedited relief to resolve this issue before the November 2020 election. On October 28, 2020, in a classic bait and switch, Pennsylvania used guidance from its Secretary of State that Pennsylvania would segregate potentially unlawful ballots to argue that this Court should not expedite review. See Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar, 141 S. Ct. 1, 2 (2020) ("we have been informed by the Pennsylvania Attorney General that the Secretary of the Commonwealth issued guidance today directing county boards of elections to segregate [late-arriving] ballots") (Alito, J., concurring) The Court would reasonably rely on such a representation. 158. Before the ink was dry on that decision, however, Pennsylvania changed that guidance, breaking the State's promise to this Court. On November 6, 2020, Justice Alito ordered all county 53 boards of election to comply with the guidance "that all ballots received by mail after 8:00 p.m. on November 3 be segregated and . . . if counted, be counted separately." Republican Party v. Boockvar, 208 L.Ed.2d 293, 294 (U.S. 2020) ("The application received today also informs the Court that neither the applicant nor the Secretary has been able to verify that all boards are complying with the Secretary's guidance, which, it is alleged, is not legally binding on them.") (Alito, J., Circuit Justice). 159. Before Justice Alito's order dated November 6, 2020, Pennsylvania illegally counted at least 61,855 illegal ballots which were received after the statutory 8:00 pm November 3, 2020, deadline by virtue of the fact that Pennsylvania did not segregate those ballots. The Department of State's records reflect that: 50,285 ballots were received between November 4 through November 6, 2020; 11,570 ballots were received between November 7 through November 11, 2020; and 10,038 were received after November 11, 2020. Pennsylvania was still counting ballots after November 17, 2020. 160. Secretary Boockvar claimed that only about 10,000 ballots were counted after 8 p.m. on November 3, thereby admitting ballots were illegally counted, but she offered no proof that only 10,000 ballots were illegally counted. 15 https://www.mediapa.gov/pageslstate- details.aspx?newsid=434(last visited Nov. 23, 2021) 54 4. The Pennsylvania Secretary of State unconstitutionally threw out state election integrity laws governing mail-in ballots. 161. In 2016, Pennsylvania received 266,208 mail-in ballots; 2,534 of them were rejected (.95%).16 However, in 2020, Pennsylvania received 2,623,867 mail-in ballots—nearly 10 times the number of mail- in ballots compared to 2016. Despite this flood of ballots, the reported rejection rate was just 1.3% with just 34,171 ballots rejected.17 As explained below, this vastly larger volume of mail-in ballots was treated in an unconstitutionally modified manner that included: (1) doing away with the Pennsylvania's signature verification requirements; and (2) blocking poll watchers in Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties in violation of State law. 162. The blatant disregard of statutory law renders all mail-in ballots constitutionally tainted and should not have formed the basis for appointing or certifying Pennsylvania's presidential electors to the Electoral College. 163. Specifically, Pennsylvania's then- Secretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated several Pennsylvania statutes requiring signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots. 16 U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Report to Congress, Election Administration and Voting Survey:2016 Comprehensive Report, at 24(2017). 17 U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Report to Congress Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2020 Comprehensive Report, at 36 (2021). 55 Pennsylvania's legislature has not ratified these changes, and the legislation did not include a severability clause. 164. On August 7, 2020, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and others filed a complaint against Secretary Boockvar and other local election officials, seeking "a declaratory judgment that Pennsylvania existing signature verification procedures for mail-in voting" were unlawful for a number of reasons. League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, No. 2:20-cv-03850-PBT, (E.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2020). 165. The Pennsylvania Department of State quickly settled with the plaintiffs, issuing revised guidance on September 11, 2020, stating in relevant part: "The Pennsylvania Election Code does not authorize the county board of elections to set aside returned absentee or mail-in ballots based solely on signature analysis by the county board of elections." 166 The Pennsylvania Department of State's guidance directly contradicted Pennsylvania law. First, Pennsylvania Election Code mandates that, for non-disabled and non-military voters, alications_ or an absentee or mail-in ballot "hall be signed b the applicant. 25 PA. STAT. §§ 3146.2(d) & 3150.12(c). Second, 1 nnsylvania's voter signature verification requirements are expressly set forth at 25 PA. STAT. 350(a.3)(1)-(2) and § 3146.8(g)(3)-(7). 167. The Pennsylvania Department of State's guidance unconstitutionally did away with Pennsylvania's statutory signature verification requirements. Approximately 70% of the requests for absentee ballots were from Democrats and 25% from 56 Republicans. Thus, this unconstitutional abrogation of state election law greatly inured to Mr. Biden's benefit. 168. In addition, in 2019, Pennsylvania's legislature enacted bipartisan election reforms, 2019 Pa. Legis. Serv. Act 2019-77, that set inter alia a deadline of 8:00 p.m. on election day for a county board of elections to receive a mail-in ballot. 25 PA. STAT. §§ ?146.6(c), 50.16 c . Acting under a generally wor lause that "Elections shall be free and equal," PA. CONST. art. I, § 5, cl. 1, a 4-3 majority of Pennsylvania's Supreme Court in Pa. Democratic Party v. Boockvar, 238 A.3d 345 (Pa. 2020), extended that deadline to three days after Election Day and adopted a presumption that even non postmarked ballots were presumed timely. 169. Absentee and mail-in ballots in Pennsvlvania were th an illegal standard regarding signatprp Verif cation. It is now impossible to determine which ballots were properly cast and which ballots were not. 117671 In addition, on December 4, 2020, fifteen members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives led by Rep. Francis X. Ryan issued a report to Congressman Scott Perry (the "Ryan Report") (Tab 16) stating that "[t]he general election of 2020 in Pennsylvania was fraught with inconsistencies, documented irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre- canvassing, and canvassing that the reliability of the mail-in votes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is impossible to rely upon." 57 171. The Ryan Report's findings are startling, including: • Ballots with NO MAILED date. That total is 9,005. • Ballots Returned on or BEFORE the Mailed Date. That total is 58,221. • Ballots Returned one day after Mailed Date. That total is 51,200. Id. at 5. 172. These nonsensical numbers alone total 118,426 ballots and exceed Mr. Biden's margin of 80,555 votes over Mr. Trump. But these discrepancies pale in comparison to the discrepancies in Pennsylvania's reported data concerning the number of mail-in ballots distributed to the populace—now no longer subject to legislatively mandated signature- verification requirements. 173. These stunning figures illustrate the out-of-control nature of Pennsylvania's mail-in balloting scheme. Democrats submitted mail-in ballots at more than two times the rate of Republicans. The State of Wisconsin's electoral voters were unlawfully certified and counted. 174. Wisconsin has 10 electoral votes. Mr. Trump received 1,610,184 votes and Mr. Biden received 1,630,866 votes, a margin of 20,682 votes. 175. The number of illegal votes and votes affected by the various constitutional violations far exceeds the margin of votes separating the candidates. 58 1. The Wisconsin Election Commission has obstructed investigations into the November 2020 election. 176. According to -the Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau ("LAB") Report 21-19 (the "LAB Report") (Tab 17), in the 2020 presidential election, 1,963,954 absentee ballots were cast, 59.6 percent of all ballots cast compared to 819,316 absentee ballots cast in 2016, or 27.3 percent of all ballots cast. Id. at 38. 177. Wisconsin statutes guard against fraud in mail-in absentee ballots: "[V]oting by absentee ballot is a privilege exercised wholly outside the traditional safeguards of the polling place. The legislature finds that the privilege of voting by absentee ballot must be carefully regulated to prevent the potential for fraud or abuse[1" WISC. STAT. § 6.84(1). 178. Leading up to the November 2020 election, in direct contravention of Wisconsin law, the Wisconsin Elections Commission (`:WEC") and other local officials t constitutionally wakened Qr completely abrogated Wisconsin election laws—each time taking steps that did away with established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity. 179. The WEC is now attempting to block any investigations into the widespread voter fraud in Wisconsin. In March 2021, the Wisconsin legislature voted to commence an investigation into election irregularities in the November 2020 election. In July 2021, Wisconsin Speaker of the Assembly Robin Vos 59 appointed former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, as special counsel. 80. AfterLTTLgq former Justice (Cablem�n issued subpoenas to Smote and local election officials the WEC, represented by the State Attorney General's office, sought a temporary restraining order against Speaker Vos, former Justice Gableman, and others seeking to block two subpoenas issued to the WEC and Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe claiming the subpoenas were part "of an unlawful investigation focused on debunked theories about the November 2020 Election." The WEC spoke too fast. !! [181 k In October 2021, the nonpartisan LAB, and the Racine County Sheriff, revealed lengthy investigations that confirmed the WEC's massive violations of Wisconsin election law including at least one felony and three misdemeanors caused by their illegal instructions to disregard Wisconsin election laws designed to ensure that fake ballots did not affect the integrity of the vote. 182. Indeed, Racine County found that the WEC knowingly"shattered" at least one statute likely causing fraudulent votes in nursing homes in all 72 counties across the State of Wisconsin.18 183. The LAB Report detailed the WEC's and other elections officials'lack of cooperation noting that the City of Madison refused to let the LAB auditors handle absentee ballots despite their county (Dane County) having the highest percentage of absentee ballots in the state at 74.4 percent of ballots. [LAB 18 The PowerPoint presentation used by the Sheriffis attached at Tab 18. 60 Report at 6] The LAB also stated that county clerks for Milwaukee County and the Town of Little Suamic refused access to their ballots. Combined, these areas accounte or . , o e 3.3 million ballots cast in the November 2020 election. (18.9 percent). Lab Report at 7. The LAB also noted that three WEC members refused to speak with the auditors (the audit doesn't mention which ones, but three are Democrats). Id. at 5. 184. After the Racine County Sheriffs Office released their findings, Wisconsin lawmakers, including Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, called oj, the Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe to resign. The Racine County Sheriff found the WEC committed a felony and three misdemeanors by encouraging voter fraud in nursing homes 185. On October 28, 2021, the Racine County, Wisconsin Sheriff held a press conference and laid out the case of the WEC's criminal election fraud during the 2020 election related to the abuse of voters confined to nursing homes and assisted living facilities. 18. The Sheriffs investigators discovered that the WEC expressly discussed that their proposed conduct for the 2020 election would violate state law, and yet they decided to do it anyway, and memorialized their decision in letters disseminated to every single county clerk's office in Wisconsin. As such, the Sheriff concluded members of the WEC 61 committed at least one felony and three misdemeanor crimes. 187. Specifically, the Sheriff commenced an investigation in early 2021, after a complaint by a nursing home resident's daughter that her dementia suffering mother cast a vote that she was entirely incompetent to make. An eight-month investigation the Sheriffs investigation discovered, inter alia, that the WEC sent nursing homes across the state letters March 12, 2020, June 24, 2020, and September 25, 2020, stating that "Municipalities shall not use the Special Voting Deputy process"—a key requirement under WIse. STAT. § 6.875(4)(a) to ensure that nursing home residents are not taken advantage to cast false ballots—and should instead mail the absentee ballots. 88 The investigation discovered that at that nursing facility about 10 residents would normally vote in a presidential election cycle but in 2020 42 residents voted. Though the focus of the Sheriffs investigation was on the WEC's clear orders to violate Wisconsin election law, the Sheriff noted seven other families also said their family members were not competent to cast their votes—and that all of these eight incompetent patients last voted in 2012. 11861 The Sheriff stated the "election statute was in fact not just broken, but shattered" by the WEC in all 72 counties across the State of Wisconsin. As a result of WEC's clear violation of the law, as many as 50,00Q fraudulent ballots may have been cast incompetent nursing ome residents. __._ 62 3. The WEC's and other officials illegal use of drop boxes in violation of Wisconsin law 190. The WEC undertook a campaign to position hundreds of drop boxes to collect absentee ballots—including the use of unmanned d_ta boxes. Wisconsin Elections Commission Memoranda, To: All Wisconsin Election Officials, at 3 (Aug. 19, 2020) (Tab 23). 191. The mayors of Wisconsin's five largest cities—Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee, and Racine, which all have Democrat majorities— joined in this effort, and together, developed a plan to use purportedly "secure drop-boxes to facilitate the return of absentee ballots." Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan 2020 Submitted to the Center for Tech & Civic Life, June 15, 2020, by the Mayors of Madison, Milwaukee. Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay, at 4 (Tab 24). 192. The use of any drop box—whether manned or unmanned—is directly prohibited by Wisconsin statute. The Wisconsin legislature specifically described in the Election Code "Alternate absentee ballot site[s]" and detailed the procedure by which the governing body of a municipality may designate a site or sites for the delivery of absentee ballots "other than the office of the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners as the location from which electors of the municipality may request and vote absentee ballots and to which voted absentee ballots shall be returned by electors for any election." Wis. STAT. 6.855(1). 63 193. Any alternate absentee ballot site "shall be staffed by the municipal clerk or the executive director of the board of election commissioners, or employees of the clerk or the board of election commissioners." WIS. STAT. 6.855(3). Likewise, WIS. STAT. 7.15(2m) provides, "[i]n a municipality in which the governing body has elected to establish an alternate absentee ballot site under s. 6.855, the municipal clerk shall operate such site as though it were his or her office for absentee ballot purposes and shall ensure that such site is adequately staffed." 194. Thus, the unmanned absentee ballot drop-off sites are prohibited by the Wisconsin Legislature as they do not comply with Wisconsin law expressly defining"[a]lternate absentee ballot site[s]." WIS. STAT. 6.855(1), (3). 195. In addition, the use of drop boxes for the collection of absentee ballots, positioned predominantly in Wisconsin's largest cities, is directly contrary to Wisconsin law providing that absentee ballots may only be "mailed by the elector, or delivered in person to the municipal clerk issuing the ballot or ballots." WIS. STAT. § 6.87(4)(b)1 (emphasis added). 196. The fact that other methods of delivering absentee ballots, such as through unmanned drop boxes, are not permitted is underscored by WIS. STAT. § 6.87(6) which mandates that, "[a]ny ballot not mailed or delivered as provided in this subsection may not be counted." Likewise, WIS. STAT. § 6.84(2) underscores this point, providing that WIS. STAT. § 6.87(6) "shall be construed as mandatory." The provision continues—"Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not 64 be counted. Ballots counted in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election." WIS. [STAT. § 6.84(2 (emphasis added). 197. Incredibly, the rejection rate for the 1,963,954 absentee ballots cast in the November 2020 election plummeted to .217%, or 4,270 rejected ballots, compared to the rejection rate in November 2016 election of 1.35% when there just 819,316 absentee ballots cast. The rejection attak in 2016 was more than six times greater than in 2020, 4. The WEC encouraged voters to illegally declare themselves "indefinitely confined" thereby avoiding ballot security requirements 198. The WEC and local election officials also took it upon themselves to encourage voters to unlawfully declare themselves "indefinitely confined"—which under Wisconsin law allows the voter to avoid security measures like signature verification and photo ID requirements. 199. Specifically, registering to vote by absentee ballot requires photo identification, except for those who register as "indefinitely confined" or "hospitalized." WISC. STAT. § 6.86(2)(a), (3)(a). Registering for indefinite confinement requires certifying confinement "because of age, physical illness or infirmity or [because the voter] is disabled for an indefinite period." Id. § 6.86(2)(a). Should indefinite confinement cease, the voter must notify 65 the county clerk, id., who must remove the voter from indefinite-confinement status. Id. § 6.86(2)(b). 200. Wisconsin election procedures for voting absen ee ased on indefinite confinement enable the voter to avoid the photo ID requirement and signature requirement. Id. § 6.86(1)(ag)/(3)(a)(2). On March 25, 2020, in clear violation of Wisconsin law, Dane County Clerk Scott McDonnell and Milwaukee County Clerk George Christensen both issued guidance indicating that all voters should mark themselves as "indefinitely confined" because of the COVID-19 pandemic. 202. Believing this to be an attempt to circumvent Wisconsin's strict voter ID laws, the Republican Party of Wisconsin petitioned the Wisconsin Supreme Court to intervene. On March 31, 2020, the Wisconsin rem Court unanimously confirmed that the clerk$' "advice wa legally incorrect" and potentially dangerous because "voters may be misled to exercise their right to vote in ways that are inconsistent with WISC. STAT. § 6.86(2)." 203. On May 13, 2020, the Administrator of WEC issued a directive to the Wisconsin clerks prohibiting removal of voters from the registry for indefinite-confinement status if the voter is no longer "indefinitely confined." 204. The WEC's directive violated Wisconsin law. WISC. STAT. § 6.86(2)(a) specifically provides that "any [indefinitely confined] elector [who] is no longer indefinitely confined ... shall so notify the municipal clerk." Wisc. STAT. § 6.86(2)(b) further provides that the municipal clerk "shall remove the name of any other elector from the list upon request of the elector 66 or upon receipt of reliable information that an elector no longer qualifies for the service." 205. On December 16, 2020, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that Wisconsin officials, in� c—Turfing Governor Evers, unlawfully told Wisconsin voters to declare themselves "indefinitely confined"— thereby avoiding si natur and hoto ID requirements. ee e erson v. Dane C 4 is [2d 602, 951 N.W.2d 556 (Wis. 2020). Given the near fourfold increase in the use of this classification from 2016 to 2020, tens of thousands of these ballots could be illegal. The vast majority of the more than 216,000 voters classified as "indefinitely confined" were from heavily Democrat areas, thereby materially and illegally, benefited Mr. Biden. 206. The LAB found that according to statistics kept by the WEC, nearly 220,404 voters said they were indefinitely confined in the 2020 election, including 169,901 individuals (77.1 percent who indicated for the first time that they were indefinitely fi confined. [LAB Report at 50] 207. Moreover, according to WEC's data, 48,554 of those first time individuals (22.0 percent) had not previously voted by methods that required them to have provided photo identification cZr did not have photo identifications on file with clerks. [LAB 51]. Thus, at a minimum there was zero verification that these 48,554 voters were who they said they were or were even real voters. 67 5. The LAB found that 45,665 voters used identification to register that did not match the records on file 208. According to the LAB Report, in 2020, 957,977 Wisconsinites registered to be a new voter. Of that figure, 45,665 new voters registered with driver's license information that did not match DMV records or 4.8% of registrants. Of the 45,665 total non- matches, 63.1 percent were from a name non-match, meaning the name ubmitted b_y the new voter obi the ballot a lication did not match thg naam_e cua Lag at the DOT. Thus, at a minimum there was zero verification that these 45,665 voters were who they said they were or were even real voters. 6. The Office of the Special Counsel's 44, findings of illegal votes in its First Interim Report. T091 In the Summer of 2021, the Wisconsin State Assembly established a new office, the Office of the Special Counsel, to investigate the November 2020 election. 210. On November 10, 2021, the Office of the Special Counsel delivered its First Interim Report to the Wisconsin State Assembly. First Interim Rept., Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (Nov. 10, 2021) (the "Report") (Tab 19). 211. The Office of the Special Counsel found that many of the "safeguards mandated for the protection of honest absentee ballots" were "abrogated by WEC" including "the illegal mass self-certification of individuals as `indefinitely confined' under the statute, a category which enables a voter to evade 68 state voter ID requirements, but which is intended to apply to physically or physiologically immobile residents confined to their home because of their condition." Id. at 18. 212. Another issue identified by the Office of the Special Counsel are "Democracy in the Park" events held prior to the election to harvest absentee ballots in Madison. The Report states "[w]hile this Office draws no conclusions, we possess evidence that the events, which occurred on September 26 and October 3, 2020, involved numerous possible violations of state law, calling into question the validity of over 17,000 absentee ballots. Id. at 19. [27--c3A The Report also identified the Racine County Sheriffs referral of cri final charges against the WEC for violations of Wisconsin's laws designed to elderly voters from being taken advantage of in casting votes. The Report states: This Office has evidence that WEC and some clerks instructed residential care employees to act in a manner prohibited by law, collecting and assisting in completing ballots for individuals in these group facilities, including those with dementia. This led to record-high voting by individuals who had not voted for nearly a decade and may have lacked the cognitive ability to vote. Id. at 21 (emphasis added). 214. The Office of the Special Counsel also identified that the WisVote (SVRS) system, the statewide system that enables clerks to track absentee ballot requests and includes highly sensitive 69 personal information, is not secure even though WEC guidance requires it to be subject to a high level of security. The Report states that"there is already some evidence of unauthorized access to this database." Id. at 24. 7. Democrat operatives were given access to "hidden" networks connecting"sensitive machines" at the ballot tabulation center in Green Bay,WI J21,j In Wisconsin, Dominion machines that were not supposed to be connected to the internet were in fact connected to a "hidden" Wi-Fi network during voting.19 216. Specifically, Michael Spitzer- Rubenstein, a Democrat political operative, was given internet access to a hidden Wi-Fi network at the Wisconsin election center where votes were being counted. M.D. Kittle, Democrats'Operative Got Secret Internet Connection at Wisconsin Election Center, Entails Show, DAILY SIGNAL, Mar. 23, 2021.20 Spitzer- Rubenstein received an email from Trent James, director of event technology at Green Bay's Central Count location, which stated, "One SSID [for a Wi-Fi network] will be hidden and it's: 2020vote. There will 19 M. D. Kittle, EMAILS: GREEN BAY'S `HIDDEN' ELECTION NETWORKS,WISCONSIN SPOTLIGh3T,Mar.21,2021, https://wisconsinspotlight.com/emails-green-bays-hidden- election-networks/(last visited Nov. 23, 2021). 20 https://www.dailvsignal.com/2021/03/23/democrats- operative got-secret-Internet-connection-at-wisconsin-election- center-emails-show/(last visited Nov. 23, 2021). 70 be no passwords or splash page for this one and it should only be used for the sensitive machines that need to be connected to the internet." Id. Four other individuals were copied on the email. Id. COUNT I: ELECTORS CLAUSE 217. Plaintiff State repeats and re-alleges the allegations above, as if fully set forth herein. 218. The Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, of the Constitution makes clear that only the legislatures of the States are permitted to determine the rules for appointing presidential electors. The pertinent rules here are the state election statutes, specifically those relevant to the presidential election. 219. Non-legislative actors lack authority to amend or nullify election statutes. Bush II, 531 U.S. at 104 (quoted supra). 220. Under Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 833 n.4 (1985), conscious and express executive policies—even if unwritten—to nullify statutes or to abdicate statutory responsibilities are reviewable to the same extent as if the policies had been written or adopted. Thus, conscious and express actions by State or local election officials to nullify or ignore requirements of election statutes violate the Electors Clause to the same extent as formal modifications by judicial officers or State executive officers. 169 The foregoing actions constitute non- legis ative changes to State election law by executive- branch State election officials, or by judicial officials, in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, 71 Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona in violation of the Electors Clause. 222. Electors appointed to the Electoral College in violation of the Electors Clause cannot cast constitutionally valid votes for the office of President. COUNT II: DUE PROCESS 223. Plaintiff State repeats and re-alleges the allegations above, as if fully set forth herein. 224. When election practices reach "the point of patent and fundamental unfairness," the integrity of the election itself violates substantive due process. Griffin v. Burns, 570 F.2d 1065, 1077 (1st Cir. 1978); Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 702 (5th Cir. 1981); Florida State Conference of N.A.A.C.P. v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153, 1183-84 (11th Cir. 2008); Roe v. State of Ala. By & Through Evans, 43 F.3d 574, 580-82 (11th Cir. 1995); Roe v. State of Ala., 68 F.3d 404, 407 (11th Cir. 1995); Marks v. Stinson, 19 F. 3d 873, 878 (3rd Cir. 1994). 225. Under this Court's precedents on proced- ural due process, not only intentional failure to follow election law as enacted by a State's legislature but also random and unauthorized acts by state election officials and their designees in local government can violate the Due Process Clause. Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 537-41 (1981), overruled in part on other grounds by Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 330-31 (1986); Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 532 (1984). The difference between intentional acts and random and unauthorized acts is the degree of pre-deprivation review. 72 226. Defendant States acted unconstitutionally to lower their election standards— including to allow invalid ballots to be counted and valid ballots to not be counted—with the express intent to favor their candidate for President and to alter the outcome of the 2020 election. In many instances these actions occurred iri areas having a history of election fraud. 227. The foregoing actions constitute intentional violations of State election law by State election officials and their designees in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona in violation of the Due Process Clause. I - COUNT III: GUARANTEE CLAUSE —f 228. Plaintiff State repeats and re-alleges the allegations above, as if fully set forth herein. 229. The Guarantee Clause provides that "[t]he United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." U.S. CONST. art. IV, cl. 1. 230. Although this Court dismissed Texas v. Pennsylvania, No. 220155 (U.S.), citing a lack of standing, Texas v. Pennsylvania, 141 S.Ct. 1230 (2020) ("Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections."), the United States has parens patriae standing to challenge the manner in which states conduct their elections: "Nor does a State have standing as the parent of its citizens to invoke these constitutional provisions against the Federal Government, the ultimate parens patriae of every American citizen." South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 73 U.S. 301, 324 (1966). The failure to pursue the United States' meritorious claim violates the Guarantee Clause. 231,] The United States and the Officer Defen ants have been aware of the constitutional violations and facts at issue in this action and have not acted either to avoid or to remedy these violations. 232. The foregoing actions violate the Guarantee Clause. COUNT IV: TAKE CARE CLAUSE 233. Plaintiff State repeats and re-alleges the allegations above, as if fully set forth herein. 234. The Take Care Clause provides that "[the President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." U.S. CONST. art. II, § 3, cl. 5. 235. The President, Attorney General, and Vice President have been aware of the constitutional violations and facts at issue in this action and have not acted either to avoid or to remedy these violations. 236. The foregoing actions violate the Take Care Clause. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff State respectfully requests that this CJourt issue the following relief: 1. Declare that Defendant States administered the November 2020 election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 2. Declare that the United States and Officer Defendants violated the Guarantee Clause and the Take Care Clause with respect to allowing the 74 foregoing constitutional violations by the Defendant States in administering the November 2020 election. 3. Declare that the Defendant States' certification of the November 2020 election results and of presidential electors on or about December 14, 2020, violated the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and vacate those certifications. 4. Declare that the Defendant States' certification of the November 2020 election results and of presidential electors on or about December 14, 2020, violated the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and vacate those certifications. 5. Declare that the United States violated the Guarantee Clause in allowing the November 2020 election to proceed on the basis of the unconstitutional results in Defendant States. 6. Declare that the President, Attorney General, and Vice-President violated the Take Care Clause by failing to act to remedy the violations of the Constitution in the November 2020 election. 7. Enjoin the use of vacated certifications in Defendant States' use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College. 8. Declare that the counting of electoral votes in the Joint Session of Congress on January 6-7, 2021, violated the Electors Clause, the Due Process Clause, the Guarantee Clause, the Take Care Clause, and the Twelfth Amendment, and vacate that count. 75 9. Enjoin the Officer Defendants to convene special sessions of the House of Representatives and the Senate to vote for the President and Vice- President, respectively, pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment. 10. Alternatively, authorize, pursuant to the Court's remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors. 11. Alternatively, authorize, pursuant to the Court's remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct an audit of their election results, supervised by a Court-appointed special master, in a manner to be determined separately. 12. Enjoin Defendant States' use in future elections of revisions adopted by non-legislative actors to the election laws enacted by the state legislatures unless the legislature ratifies any such revisions by enacting them as state law before the election. 13. Award costs to Plaintiff State. 14. Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. N i aralaCT--T....n s. Respectfully submitted, �e�e m5oe� 1-O?10.11 Oc,tAke,1 F'4 C-rS C 1r [Name/title] Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State /3--7 - - 4 S► 1 /-�_� .. (L I I, e03, s5-1 - 22 -) 1a0 la- L Ccf[ x :3 - -1 'A� �`cQf i isc2 a ti � h1A_ Cyr1 )yn • .3 -1 -�� pco 1< \Q kkI w `-ice L. , Aciot \,I 1g . . - -2_0 ot rr�� 6reeve ,.S.,,, hcl_ft ci .n� � 1r v;r� ) T - -2, St i'w flit Ie/r ^ - Air top,fsjr'1 �' 0 0 7 ✓- co//2 f''/ =l -�- LA__ i A� ,..g0 , ‘ I ce t\k_c_._-- 3 -7- 22 fl horsy R_Acnsu-i , CCC-L(e1 % -7-7-2 I14V JtG G. V3k cel log 0 � . -- Grp. `-)` `,3- 7.2 2_ ��/1 6a_co vt t • �'' (mil "-17) 1/(e_ (4.,4 tc6-".^A.Nlie.wy-A„ / L-e_e. - r(,,i,:cfc( �� -7 .�- ?tot i2Acirk c twuek lipLe-E - 0 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date11 Printed Name Autograph County, State 3l�A - pRuL Rfac- . A\ k:, VS_ s „t,--_,—. L e e_ S:-- L - 2 I -, ' >>A _ 4(a.. ,?-1.7� a; �r-o-z �nc�.� b , .. .,cam 3-►-•22 i ucte,e✓k -': L C0i4 - F 3I`9- 2� r� )ee ti r 3'lI-a� / I �L��t.. T JS C4a- CorT`i' , F1 ' 26 J ' M hid \eNKikc f ,0, rL�� - i _ 0w _ A r — , _ rj . Qi ,tiIL - ,___ 47°1/t/ CJ LL erI r �oGL= T� , `�l z� �4 ve-o�.o oi \bkirD ti_ 14,EaQ, Ptc, ", i i i.e II 1 ):2- t ., i ()- 6:t.t.,\4,y4,1,,_ Pi,k,32_ \p-A,A nA,,,\ CaRceii 3/ 19 a s auto 0.6A,k_ k'c r ii Mark C-01. 11 fr Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 3-14 zZ_ e;.� al .\ -ei Coil. 1-- , 94.)U-- ✓o(l_'S "J\043-y4L 4 4.-e-r c-A_ 31 i Not Ug:iik(/ - tiU• } --,, i CO/1-7 ._ 31 ---Ii-aa. y l lee, alet 2.2r ( Ira 6J..nvrc-- if 04, 3 `g -zz ' but c k, < /q::)— V 3f1 0zZ- ("se oe - _ 4Q..z 7-t 31111 2Z ` ' MN�� C Y L G k 047 31 � /zZ ,V � (.1.2;ef,� 31k1 - W'ii ki H ^t mac,.9":11 YwC, 1,^.9 C.0 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State =3/)-5-k \%,fin//b62n %; , al{)/Y\41:----- ,,,d,,,,,,,_ 3 _. )(9,D :-"1");. ,„e c_ -A1 -'___ry41,,:, -C-->44. --/A t- .-- LeuLp iE Ct tA.;l 4 iLa,1,a t/to II' 7 L S(►E Di il- l' l e-e _I L 25 a�. 14 r<�ov co s / ' i , ' .►cam _ �� �o L ' ,l 31a31 q,c lk(.0.. Ar,�,,, N,33 N • ' 3a z-&J z +'(u ► -1,--" D-A c- VA- 9 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State r -z r ZZ C4(1 a Op I l -- Zee -L, 3�_ V) .)-- /T .1 v,/ /7Zti Al4 h "if'„; 1-�.�Zy .2 z Ai 'l.7AA.v 4 ) Alf- 37,y a..:2 /DoAiA/ 1I0x7" /—< j- - ,fie f34'1/,a1- i 2 Jr CA,�� /116 x i e ci, _ 11G. ,� - 312.(0-t -f ,s S,as5 C/` • lv,t31.14-i,9 40-- )-?u\) -'> )-(211 111 .14114114- r 11.14 a IM/14. cieWe sL- Py 2Z L-ta►t S r i �! - i CO (l I eC 4.2Z �. .ram '/ n 3 2s �)6!.1 1.h it►. , 'r �d • �x ��. � n .ram . , gree Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 11 23 II_ , CO IC.: c aim.,A%'_ _ l zti C"' ' e At, a p _ ,0-- -- 32312 ` e.--„i of ,,-v,s 0 r ,/ 100- it _O N.' 1,/ L.. . '� ►►o- M-Ot re_ I/i lk -LjamgmEwriocise . A \ 4') A../ V ____ � �� - G14 i�1 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State / Ar.MIEL: L.G- —.s teininiiifiriffifiriMMENIMMOMIllr.r r , tit 1,;,.J 6. 0,--- 117,., � �► Lee .C1�7� IIn lll.lg��/ �� _—e.- zirzz Te_Fr'r 3A► t i Hl Z � 2 I (.1 ) t/'''Oa C3111fr gilla ,J Mu Qc,y-tin 0 ,, (t'Ii v 1/ .a/ ata, 30 frQ jg,, fre, Oii c�2v (2 ©h, r Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State .c,2. 2-- MOAM" A.01- 47. N'te,k)ii(at::)... C6-6_,---C-- Lil 1 /2 2_ 1 I l ss, o w h;il� �YYLn 41A , Evi e Ohio inictn, , i FL 'ilk \zZ Cis C si& La-e- '- `,kV22. ' 64 iu i •. 1V.__ I ( i a '0! '/ u / '. ���� •i_fit' o 1 1'2r / s ' / G - S -t-f- ___��_ All C( ��S -T=� i ,-/ 01.2- = '---' -I ' 21_ II lam► O9 L ,r. �� or teli- - I - 22- ‘ sp m A / "11 S ' -t cc L L.,t - Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. ate Printed Name Autograph County, State 331 a CAre, It Ses-6 in� ff �tCOIir / 31 A V i� t ruTk Gvatarr\ U ', e- AO' 4 L e __ �3 h'? k),.,.n 5 G,4-�i,4.M ' I / /-,k— Ft, 3 a--. '' f\to.\-rai Q____ ) •1 . 7, v . S( V6 it C w...ktp__AL CI' .e._i_. \i ...I.W42, e S Iv 1 e L. en -' . Oa ��,ea- 3l 3 , I 2-2 '44 ,i2 . _ 1 -4 ` -: c .(1 -% 9-1 ,jA, Ili iLALL i NI �Z J�V' '. 8-c- ., 'V\)-- " p '--- .(31 k Ck j �i s,j5 Ll 2 , J vg,t,,,q, t llac 40 1 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State ' . c.j.7,-I_A.: 1 - C , ,9-1 AZ kf"..1.,re.,4-- U L.Z Liz i CA/.Q -adt- {_-l . 3/z,Vz,z-- " itA Dub (,,dit 7":--a_ 3/27 2 I . f 'Gil) a/4/7— ,3 2,412,21 ....1 ke;yi,,_ AZ51 01,./e,7 i)2/4,-7;--- AO, 1 ZG z .i9 /a6/2 z k V .-t �, V . V/3 a/9--,--. 4l ay.)9awa- L e/` ( e.4,_ kirV, :5I ;C I-2; 0 Cilif . V... ...,>)7- f 10.4. , 1.11473 iy_CTI -" 72 "IA 1 J-6u 6 it c,. ibeiL Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State ©3-a6 a) C/,: Cad,- (--)"(27,/e.:: G rrnc M 0 0 4)€)------rvAr -GA'2-1-Q-- "Ler (--c-tA---,--i 3 ,v /..2-›.. c .-,,-e,,40 ,v,,,,,,,, a. ,,,L,1, 34,1„,_„,-,,,,._...,,i. . ... ..? i . .. ,....5),,,,,Qe,A (3,C.11,1,t- _1. ., ,..,_,_,..4e,- ,, 4,- mi,fi INsi m It a i ra 0 1 a awli Fif, . 1 3 , /7� C 1:3 Xz)l--z,z, .1/Gz i/...IAA • 1-eA ; 1--Z .._...5.... .2 , ‘57tig I Zto Z � N �1-< <-/CA. , ....e.(_____ C o l l r Ff2 /Va 2 -7p5G F'k ,1?,t_k Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State . 6--C1^-k.._ j-4,0 II/ /414Acivu- T-JArd /It 3/2 5/92-.z kg- `sue- Cd ie,i) pi_ 312s1 2"7 c lr‘r 1sq„,s C;s-'he t2. CaI e171_` /2G/Z�- (�j�-,�1 �� al Z Y2V2 2- (7 t‘o,c-Ses Vcel,wck � [ df I-�, { � iZ _SOa•-, Cadi 2 Cdtt; te fL I ids L-Ii`et a Ndig ;r c, ei, re__ spna e t kt ' , P 14./04. iki ,/,--kf-6rA--4 4/1 . ' 4 -6;4--t_t --R,___/ Pt"-- l-2 /I22 V) n L � �` er i - C c � / r r,ka� mod_ • ,;.Ifl, ,..�, q& .3 -- r' , _ _ A , .j,-)- 1"t P/� do of, (/ce- h Illa Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 1//2/172 CilitCZE dh.Vrf i, ... itiev:)b ez1 ZZ- AA 4.A.( 1 c� ) Z' `�I !_ �'ot�/c.� ‘-iiia/ a LA utif;D._ -Q- _ mov `J C* Lc)h '� .�' .4 ''ffthir Z- A : L ; 14111/u 1 -3 - ' aLZesram 5 - =5 f%rtl ii , Cf., rc.ofQ% 1 Li 3 � 12„5, NA,d--tom 1._ _e., 131 zz ► eif ✓�,-de,g, tl , • LEF "f (3)a Q. d, ri'l:}e : I C,�) I )L-e-i ,r _ VP- 3- i L 1 r) 2c,-14-5 cz `rr ,- Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Au'o• ash Coun State 1 / Coil of /�- ,,,..4 ..amilimir.__._ _ _ dormrvi — / /NNIIIAlriMEIKSIMUM171111W _ '/ - 1 i._ �. 1/ �� O� �! ►' its ;.'� - -C.( -)._ ' , 1 e-91k 6 \i LL4;41, . c e r Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State /- yie,Z) 6-59 X ..1i Pn6 Ac' C ci4..0;z,r, l� LI-I i s J ) Q. ,-,.1-%`,. !L CW,E.J, ( . `(j c/Q J_-,4.,,, A -yu (,S e�4--.,cam,, 4/24 )-2- . u-$4-AT 4--o K I N61 - CAUh\C-r /it. v /, co- 4`�s-/ )- fli T L �� co 4, , q .2 ;Z. rer;,At. oo/14K 77 Sjzz 42,4r7g4-y c>071(4'12 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Auto• a•h Count State .---------- it' Z Z � a 4 W e- k A b ►:i.�1 e��. ' ' - . A ‘-e . V. �'t = 7 li . M oZ --,e- 1--i - i ,41_ _ IGe! �— - *.. !jam\ 1 O +5 ON �� a )4 Lit Li l LZ l _MIMMIM _ L Q Vl �"t sir ' Iv- 1.....� u < ' s is v L �:IM r - ar .. _ U ST Y r C-z- Cc' pyre f%_._ ..._ d 407/ e Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State /4/ /IX-0t71 i'C-1/4_14 &At( 2Z i ,{,(,l r_ �It� L ZVdih Fe-C•-t G.(II f y�z Z /c/ ..40„04 cibi/2;1_ dqr) esa,vz..r 611J,L___. 6,30 Li_ fey 2 Yt u �Z�•Cliti-}►tizY� itK�K�,yy t✓b LI._ 19" a maho (\ , ocvc 7l ut'/2z �.�,i/2ie�l T - =-7-zi3/4-cue pig 7 e,ea--1 ►� h .6 ii Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 4))0d nn 134 i\l' Lu- -) -.22- (, —7/ ��l. £-, 2,e , ke -1, 0(\d r F\u(sf oN,. _ 77Z"Z______Li ____4 /i 2z (.t,)1�/f 4,1 Mc�cI - tee, 1//2/4:2_ JoA.jt R, Brau/L 464..4/ R, 3�c�cvr� L e.G Cv �L, LZ / . 1 // l —I c c_ -6rc n o / �-Q.tyry Lee_. d ,.2.2 ge„JL� 4 */-� .Ki i /, • 1 1litl/ , /1/r//' .. 40/ i i. ..ApPr/ _5,- -/emeirt iZ 1r�Arrar i> w ' h�aVaVtgO4/trify 1 (oIiv v. 1,2— d4 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name 1111111 Au .• a. Count State / L 2 ', U h it C . ► -v L1' . . . �/i �f�,I/Ji,' t I er F /ifinglifir arailitirt PLEPAIMMIWPAW 02a ' %� ... • J , A- zz - E(IA( 3la(e Le e - Rtk (74Q O QL 1)1 (Jej 1-__AWCe-f-L---if `�' // /Zz � �«r t � / ' '<< < � c,t (" Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State C ,d as �o -7 v VVl 14,�� �. P� elaA mref A-7ele—deykorti_e- - F.0 --I/ -2-2- ',1/'/l 5(Lf3-, el FL y-// � ma"ram Wic-c. �/7►ct.�-ice v s v� �- // cD.Le_Cent '-//- 2 `2 __I), / • JJ /l /4 Y 7) A'G/N ,6 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 'A/O /Zz TCY ckey' Z e, r( ✓41,k,k.prt c( . 1-I0 'Till I it Hi.-4L ze)lL/Gf) ( llt LZ; F /(o 1Z JJcs epn Pc� t,i ( 2' u- -044_ —70-, at,„ loC�o 4J .p�� h // / // // y( It'd(t a CcA L yl�i-C.c[ -tA. l -(0-22 ,�1 gel%� (C2 �� Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. D to Printed Name 'utograph County, State AO ( .3\ L4Orqckdoo( K 4 , ; .QA11-6br__)C.N11'-fc 11, 3 31 2Z- >it)", Ri't_kcrd5 V/ ' ,� �.t,,ctt en a;er t„ortA 1‘..6(lt e (icif., (..,„____ q3, L - -- j4¼ M0-4L • In / ., C.4Y4 u/- 2- 3 I ,, . -s4rz- , --k4l' 0 /// A ►._ 1 MITI tl ilNA k \A)‘ P A t \ Pik- 4 ,© j" .v9.,--„,._. i5li�s ----„„ l t( rs- -j g- a7, Prc� �- 6-1 rm ( 4. C, o 11irR. le 01Z l u..r ,., . rwd'.A_ e `:, e c--- Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Auto raph County, State q I°\ a - tlavov f 0r 4 1 ; FL RI ct (.22 07 r-3,� Lcr, ram! - V- as iNv.c. `�R��v‘ i q-9 -Z�t rr/ /,,/ .,.4 // L l� -61 11. % • 22 C°z, .61 ‘0, : k. 4- CtLi , Y r - -.c_k;c' 6.,c. , P /a-/ ) c G 1, e r • q g_Q- 4 sPom r •-v1,.. `\-1 10/019, l'ilikAiAc, 1AS. 3 R' /2Z II4IJ 1P-- 6 ° l er r� rl C5 (). . �,f � - �,. U io 22- P N16F1- ILH�4 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; anal, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 02:2— 4-pet Vi a Fist p, cc 0_0 a%die F L- ti ) 21 L v , S►lvk 11al, cu1 k/2 — y '�Lr-1/rT 7;.4/K:i'.i1/*; j �7)AerL �C'�f/✓/. 12nca ry �. r � , i��� ter "-/I _5103-4A) 612Z . CIA qff22 lealher 1 G � l 'e r/ 22 / r .� Cl"� r�" d l( / "Vs/ - i4-yvt E s .*,ZarSw„,.fir� Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State /9la-,) -3. G i Q. `S Onr\s.r, `-/ 69 Q.o/),'E r - F"L .4. '... .--0?t).-- ,621261,2Aft....... )0/2kfpah 7— g 9/ ?Pa.7117 ' A rY, 110 60a41 -1—L ►j-jcP 4 Liz NO'S F t yiq jazr Oa rU/ Pd ;n .t.,C "-!/. ..f i—e.e_l _ ji.,(kc... o..e it/ 1 (, ,-a ikct icitu:biLip--- , --Gjej_____ 4 if 0 _ Y 1 1 22 fit,f IlaycS 12( VcyZ Z bLi5-,,✓ Cv/ fi✓s LE Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Auto• a•h County, State h 1 Tel (647E.5 (14,1,ititFL t ,..... , , I-)- L kc ,Lo C•`cci,) ,Eft- F L gp, �a . an Al C .:.• mac- as _ , _41 i . I ec ',, A®,_p 7 .,?, _ 0 , i,i, " Asw, o � 3//jAlgllrarimr4llyfr':fk- /. 0.r /( °' 5 — 14 —1Z i t _ . - 3 '--30 n �t fi L c►__--- 1 -1 7 ' 2. 0 / i4- nN rim . iP f 1 i' 3 - rk- - z2, C,0 i - /5 ( �-� f f 91tl2 �iva� G L 1 / C 3 i v id-,;- -Pcutn Le,V e.fk iii T./ z ;t_ - °�/ �, �i ; M( 3 /1$/ Z L..c,.,.vcp LeV1PAJ .r M/.Jca/rihc Pea 3/le/Z 2- 7), .SI Pe e,/t� , , ' Ca l/i C Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 161121 i ,7 E 1,..41,1/4,z.�<<<' -, (C tLQJ t it 7)\ A)-. '•t\t \& ( e 3/ )b )�'� i/�;� .T i v a slt..., ��,�.� ti__, i (3� ?J �°-c , ' 11 • (.ill ��/-_ 1 ( — r-i) ric- -01 TI i'-C)cl(-__P. / _, y_ _________ (---_ ,..,) 1 , -7_2((6- z, -7, - c,\,,,(1 ) 0 a. ),\ , , ,. !. _ ,..K.,._ ,J,,,„)t, k \) 0 -i •to • 3 el.A..,iI tQ n ,J 6.-n c is LQ t. _y/o/2-P- ..___/_. .„,,--1-L,-,--3.,,,,,t,V 3/ 1i'-'1 , �*, t(c-( 3\, u121— 4\,'5)i— 5 �\---- i," Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 3/D/o/72_ Lch1ci 13-Ovas7I-GI•, 4-4 / fo / / COUn-11_ )4 r LA11._ A of r` '- X /'ik---' PV,WL thCAL 31 r12 w ;2_Z--, , ,... ffr5>t)e-afrrA", /30 A,a/i417/ ,_;) 1--"&a-- /7---- s1/5-/ 2 Z- /3ivii) Alitv7 r% i/oGva elk, i'' L !(/( -7-‘- V - -g-it-A-16 ' 1-4,74---rr e().ff �Sp-2, C G1 \ 0 C•N-4 Ci S CV ( r L C�L� ea I CA 3 k -)._2_ 6-a, 84,4.- -4K.sii, Ai /_, cct->i rt-tv 0 ‹..•(.._ a 4_,--4.4) Sda-a4 )1ff.,, s aoz'� - ` VI c.S S► ?�r c SS 3)1 122 LC)Q cL, l_bz`si,_ d i-cLia - L f 6._ VI9,z- /77/, 4 ) i If1 �� �,� /� . . 7 Z L( of S ni L%&�,,L-y Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State 5( ;‘,/ lI ee,p-J 6rc I Cbcr2, .erg iAtispv.r, ee �)c c&,,' D��� � J Cle)( i,e3 \ c \ z 1 ( Sys/-et) %vok L. 0_ g be 3) 1 q '25z 3 -I9- 2-Z /9 1kE Ji)c ►c 07- i/ kEZ 03 - 1 01027- (_aA/-ri ,(f�r�/)Id C. c�,�1 o rC 63�19/20�Z f LiGfA 30..11.4-S � v�.: ed6.,*h14G ��1�� 461 r la Cy rc -- Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State ,) r • 7 III I/ 0OVA ,� ,-Z I�U ` \� 6. 7(4 LL 1 I . y � C-C� Cct'ern -rz _.fit,--/le. / ' ti cvr- (-) V d'te A_, 17,12r -E2 ' (f7 .1"- i_- i . i ,ail i / ,I ,, 1114 A_Illigile e Pj1` / .7 —1-17:morml 44.) ,.'re't" A _ 6-C/2 X) 1'14- - //6, .4-6s e iy‘li .ereCAT _ - -419" SI , : ,,►` C.: l\c.:- \\, \A-, v l`( C Clk\,`@ 2 1 tit( T-K r C l --l.-0-u.k k'+.° .\ 10t)c, .-- 4 Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name uto a h County, State /(rA(72-- A(IctLASA-yrik? C -1() 611/67 i4 ji 77V/2-Z �Y�/f mil4-17/1/ Z/c.t ! 't-~if(t 1 11` 1, Ley,lzriCe _P- il4. 44 7dc 3 'F(zz (,J 1 , , wVfc1c' 1, 7 • (i©� 2z tChe(1e _ [ c.�c #m _ie t . - ,�r cry 1 c ck Lc ki 7_1(1 Cq:Je-F, A tt-< 3 - , A 9`. , �. /nA a I1 7 l 7 / /-- &e.t`r Cent S 6/ 6=-r` Lam- -C', 3 (6 2- — j ' 4 -7( 3 I \c'k 1 ZZ— V b6V\ ")If11,- `,,,>>l i -___ Petition for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell, challenging the validity of the 2020 Election. Whereas, the State of Arizona's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Georgia's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the State of Michigan's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted; and, Whereas, the above Constitutional violations are documented in the Bill of Complaint put forth by Mike Lindell; and, Therefore, We The People, living on the land, lawfully and formally petition Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to join the Bill of Complaint and to take the complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Date Printed Name Autograph County, State /*S/ At d � /I- 0iii cf ✓ )l 6, r �� g/z mA �l� �( ��/ Vvp� � d1, Lti V ;/cs.." — C-Mze'cSfZ,LG�i4. / Z L r sagaCC; ', ,) U e i cA - :',' 12, A'e er ' 4.1 2,J20.0_ 4�.c -11 _3`, r � roLtr o7 1-i+ / (11.1. - / // ,Z2. !L Q2 L.,...-4 r aoLitiQICI 46 (,. // 1.) C_, ),( e y6._(‘-, ,-",-1z4..m, mal, , , - .41firk,,' ' .06.. _• L-1:6 i'&---r- 7 —� a) ro - (1:3� ro . : 4-, ' A, t"--14 ,3 0 ucv L a w o o�� -IC •CDC O yS; , — � U J - `' s. O •.p -a c C O _. w `� \. — V ` � C cu c CO () V 4-1 CO a' v '� O= 0 v vliaia1 O N CO CV c = m p E C -0 N NO O O O O" v E -0 �4' , OhiflZ CU = U a!t i •0 H— - 0 F Co- _O cu.., i..- _ i- >• :_ a) v > c 3 t� '. O > O = 3 23 ra U CD = M N s- V N M .0 c T. 2 dl 8 N O 7 `s co ln •C au a) 3 ° 3 N CO+° ' G,l fa 0 O O —ns O et; \" a) ca 8 > O co-8 _c (,) �' , f,..... :0 .1..• _ u) a) T.-, c o. C N TO O j C CDNG) O 0 CU t `' . — toED — O O a-' _ U Q Y ON .O 5i ±• V il VI dim ) �� al cc cf .L � 7 O O• O O a) dC fav �i Y_ ( 7 r ..0 cc cv E *arc, .O O 8 , ,_, ____. , C \ (� L '� t jj CV) VT 0 Ln �C ~ ��+-- �J ' 5 v O 0 a a, v a, a) W a >-c E V C ` `� 4— 4- H 1-- t 1I— a�-+� O N O CO a a a. co15 o2 -� , .G 2 2 2 an 0 a el 1= 0) C a >. - ,�, �_ - t s t t .c t C t au t �r- �- a S � 5'"0 tom-Q r-J cJ I , ` ,',1 1 +.+ aJ co c13 < f--- C m Y •a roc N L , -1 4-0 ca >. v a ouc L, , ..__. V u -c c o cc 0. CL Q 0 C, co 49 OW Q� +' �, 'a;a a� CO c CO N c c 0 �aJ p E c LL'a ` 0 = 0 c� 0 cc a? s , w N o ° a E U c.- 4-, v -O "0 c u o o -G D �� C c a' .a c to ?' m _ °c * r` •0 4— -a -0 aJ w e m v Q4_, ,- +, pae A U u >. a E o o ca e t , _ ' f• 0 70 ..I.t.' = = CU a 47: -0 : E mV I I, 'i ' 4 c._u r° r.0 C 46 a) E a) = aw) m• a.., __,I.i, iit 0.i itiL ) --4 1 C i aJ aJ T._ aJ O 3 as v• ) ao aJ - 0 3 cn CO+, <t 3 3 a a - 0 in a) aJ +� cc `n �' 0 L — _ 0 aJ O c a) cB O ° > fa p C t > > r4 c co au+"' a) U t3 c—oc 0 j O cc o .c 0 _ i p i >, t�J O fa O U U) m aJ •> O Q >- N 4-1 v _° c aJ O E 1 s •:] a) c co c on O j T� J �n►� a N aJ O U O —� o = U) v i • aJ c 'tLD t 0 +-, _ ,t ,. Q Y ON 0 t"c_i vi N ai GD N :) 1 tom, +:� c aJ ° a a) CC _j • >, o 0 0 0 0 �,Li a c Z 41 r: �' y 1 ; po L '� N N N O N tc a-+ ,% 0 O aJ a aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ C C \ �•- c , O G.. r a) a) iJ aJ co aJ— iJ c a- >, aJ aJ of aJ aJ aJ aJ c aJ 0 '- A t .c .c .c tc .c E aJ t '', c., rk o` ( t-- IL I a) 0_ •L N V V cts = 0 CD 4-) _,- -'",' — —: ., ie k- 0 Ca. eZ N .0 Q iQ 0 4 V 4., T 1V W T7+'0 i -pa+ Ws E •w 'a n ) O wo ` /yCD � a a E C �rts 0 r)o C •a) c� o o E -a v p — a) -p C u `6 G C = C O ca �• v a1 •— w /, '04- -a 'Oal a = CD W ._, a) a) >-O Q a \ TT P .;_,, rt ›- -0 ow (-) ›- 2., = -- 42 Ot ' ,- .-1441sh:), 3:4 st r_... O > 5 • 4 3 3 °4-, cc -a O 1 N 3 3 sn co C c� Q :' ..0 o = E x CD cv — a/ . o4. H > C o o C IT o o > CD `� � N (.) C Ws 2O > u O O •ca p (7 _ o o v _� > c� > a) o a"i c a� is O ) i i C N N c a C 0 20 in > '� 1 (1) O El) t 0 :G v < 2 0 L., ±-i- bi, ,, 0 a) i o ..a ...) --.. 0, 0 ._..) L t N N N O N CO 'O a) 0 0 L .0 .0 a7 t cu t - -C E _ - 1 I (� L 'L ) to V/ u) Cl) L a) gca ca - ` ct �a) EL; v Q.) a)— a) C 4- >. .-1 g 1 i ate+ .) ,� +-+ a) CO — / 1 . " �l ' ) Y 'a (a,- (I)) '' \-L L L L N Q o cz J �+. -4411 1 -1:27 Co _ r 1 O i 73 aa) C .c CD�' V✓ 0 0 -a) a: a) c*' is �' •c Ca N c a = a) p a. c ,�'a O c z o g 0 as' N Q Q a E -0 o 0._ 4.3 N -a C 0 GI 03 y- o .G D C C 0 o I . •O `'- -a c :a) = m aa) o .c O a, • C . a� as a� Q I �, � -, O �>,, F ai C a) C _ ' - J ' >. CU u a i.i > _ o -'(a O > -5 Z 41 111, M .0 E = ...., ,_.. \ ci--- , -,.., \ N 3 3 co ra C _ m o a , .. ' --.71 ,„J >, -c C _ C o z E >tic "' 0 "0 \ '-‘-' ,AIN re', „T.5 y..' ...,N1 1 .. ‘w. ii 1, ‘ u1 N N 4, CO CA •d RI w ) coQ 0 0 a I Q '�,� fa to 4•+ (I) V to Q > �Q+ 0 ice-+ii t. J Q L 5 •5 -Z \ C in fa C a0 0 ---• C C C a N (AC C 0 C V "i! A. cn C CL 0 .•P 'j'+- J r) �J i 1 O J is ca to o c 3 � —- =1»- - '�! , N O - tri -•— Li N co -Q a a) a� > > a� o �'J �r /� [-' - . •I , 4! te•+ �' ;' a..r Q O L -' J J LL 'C ��U 4_ ate., % CO 0 . H�0 �% ; L r ..72, -t 0 \ C vi vi ER vi vi C '" C O ca CZ (a CD to to fa-0 p G _ I) a) 21 aJ— cu C w9- ›.. �, i j :G v aU a) aU a) w W a1 ca s a- r4 ^' J In -� N . 4. ' '---) i 4. a) _ NI 4-0 .Y co T Q. I R 74— ,E '''A S.-1,- *, ‘) ck _ tv 4-1A E C n a V 0 1 c3 co o ca. a. Qom, pp °� Ill 4-Eg -� = 0. - 0 O = z 0 Oo Co " a)v N 0 O U - -0 U c••— +�-+ v -0 C ( O 0 = c O a, a, =+� Q! I . > '� . a, c a) C C Tc co L : . \- • a - i >. a, U a c 0 1 �' 00 > = w ` 3 3 _13 o Q ‘‘ ` �►� 4- Vf 1C C _ C U C� 3 r -t3 4 --- -Iv D v = = a, .,.., cis = cu C.J �— ,_. liw- lie' ns y- J 1� -c c a, E, a, 0 3 -0 N 3 c _'" \ , Q 3 3 if) a-i y L' L' Sao V co v N a 4 °' 0 "'CO c 13 O 0 0 In > cn C C > 0 co U L > L v O O >, 0 O 'er _� VI CD -� 0 0 Ii --e g ,5 44 ,Se Ar C C a a, "' U C c 0 CU ?S < Y 2 O u �' vs -O m v J } J — �` 0 0 O 0 a, a c CO ?r '� ti C ajz ca >- ,E-. "C3 "' v --- -- \_, , ' C' ,\-)0 co p 0 a, a, a, u a a, a» >' C a, - C C ii a) Qa) a, a, a, a) ai-0 a, E a, 1 ` r"' �� 0- 'S �� S-tea H Q r ' ?: (_' r _ `J ct t v 0 ala C T \ a) Co r� 1 C >• iii L "� �; V U li ° C Q Q. Q O W -Q To Iin -a t co s \ — O C -a a C -a O.a CO N w 0 C LL a� _ v O O O O "a U co C4 4 ▪ v -a 0 cCa u co O 0 ;G= :\' •\ ,.� V C >- — U aJ.c ,c'J � ▪ +� lC aJ — O Q}+ O + L a) C' u ate-+ C f0 CU L. 0 V = ii p i01 - j `a tiA`(4- ' O N. _2 C _v t O O ej Q) i. L.) +.+ N -c C 1 C, at 0 3 -0 3 Q •-� 3 3 in aa) cull T. �0 N a CO gm -ate co a) a; O V) > Ill C C a-, O > O Co C -C O > 6 c �G Co0 o a4a' ( L. N v V ra co 0 > O M p _'co \ \ cV ' O O au) > C 0- Q) . v 'v >. v u cu aJ a To p E .� J �2 Cl) "C N 41 a) c w ca c ao O G C C a N cu c C O CU .., �� \ f L C a O 4- V' .' �� U O - 'ru CO co �`�' E = > p q �. ago o +' b- Q Y o .0ED cam) n c .aim Cl `v i fa 2 a C7 2 a) O 8 O.c E V �y -C o o U0 O0 a CO Q S. Q �, S .O a) 4_, E a' > > a,,0 z J c; l� 7, LJ , 4_, . � (j (I) V) O (/) -a . +-+ , Cr. " t -C -C -C _c .0 E �j"a ,i �" �^ /o ,) C . I-- C .i 60 CL 0co co CO CO CO CO-a ,..0 1 v (� a \ .G 2 w 4) QS— CU C � >, �' :G a) a� a� a_ a_ a,-a a_ co a) a) rp �� ` r' td CD .c .0 .c t .0 t= .� t C — N N '- r/ o s .2 \ .Ni i Gi , CCO ow a e' >+.+ � U _ = I Qo v cnU oo • ` u o a�i y c a S Q -0 0V) CO (Ni Hfli o CU 0 E CLLaJ iv (1 C a.+ .-N Ili ,F- ,,,) ° N c0 a) = U fi t gj r` , J cu, 2:„.49 ' iLi.''"s• iiii r_ ,..4., c 4-ofln = .0 C a a) 0 3 -0 = 36 CA Q 'pp 3 3 a) v `—° , N cn v +, ca of -a'C t� a) +a p un >> C C o > fu C o re ro coC CO > c a= a) U O cc O ..5.- j- a = O 0 to ; o .5 C Q. J r a '� E � c a, a, (A C c o C U `� i , • -a , 4- 4- c 4- u a C CO �a l a a a a > �.o O 4., +r �• p o -0 , -,---- , \\,, •-. 4_ a.- ..c co 0 u p a) a a) CD a) a °) T t C o CD CO CO m c6 .,. VI UI MS co p (I? rJ q 1 Rs N' A a) a c"-t (L.) \,1 I we tQ I >► L w o o2S J ), I *) 4- Q L- Q V U -0 = _ 1 a) z = C.)U c.) i ! fl i a-' CU ca a) +, 0_ w c ca m o au -, _ -o ° Ci- -a o CO N ej = a a) o E c L 0s* O 0 2 c E -a u U p C �. c 4- c .P 1 C -C c C al A 0 0 0 a„ a� J aJ '� ,,,....),.....,. .4 1 o C `( °' a' a o Q n° ca f6 l - uIjt ; t ;: O i fC '* '\‘‘ ' a ! 1 ! fli i y ,l -cc 2 C. a) p 3 -O a 3 g Q '40 a, 3 3 i v o fu O O w o h = � _ L C,1 CO O Oy c O .G ��,, _� p �O V H y -p—> O Q QJ, .� >'' CI) 0 E z.- L: c ---, 5 o• -, ' 4 v -.J...; ---S" ..I._ Q.s1 — Z c a Q t ° ' i '` `� , ` aQ o � ' c v .V -2 i § 5 8 0_a) L _..%3 >- o 0 0 c 0 a) a c z A v ).\ __ __N:: p• p a, au ° a) au a) a) ›.a C .\ -' ,. , (,) (-V- ,= a) aJ ar a ai ar= a, c 4- >. r, rb ''r` �� :G aU a) ar w as ar.6 aD co a N ^I 0 L__ 6- LL CU 4-1 L-i 4 .1 a, .� �- ,` _lc \ &\, ' ",- C -6 .0 0— >,*, N.) .4, c ,, •,..v t -.3) co a E 0 Q. L Q. p V U t -0 c o co 0. 0- a N 4— v C co - u -a +-s a) cc a3 O Co -a � w C .c 70 t OC ca +' min a� 00 CN100 C M 0 = o 0 c LLa N N o 0 u E -0 V c._ +, a) -0 C 0 co o o .GD 1 � c t c c� a •P a) `o ..„ F_ ..p s- 12 a) ..c C To'W • Np_ii j it ), U 2 a) "§A a3 4,1' 2c g .c ro (-) G� 4A L' To a, to' =Y \ y ,A. .0 _C a) a) 0 3 -0 S 3 cc Q tif •t 3 CU a) 3 N a, a) o W C -C > � L to 0 � � t. R. p U N > > c Q `vl t� >. Q) aUi a) > a) CO o G `= i r N 'p N a� a c v, ca C to 0 r \ \i— �1 u i c N C a c `'- ( Q v - / p —� a a_ o v l� i_J c� a{. ~Q N as :n c Q a s , L >- 46 o o g o u a, °- c `� ' C .� CD at a� > > a�'O z {-4, I v C T O O u U O ca co cu 2 cu re c, c 2 re- o E.D. LJ N w N N= c 4- >, ,, ,1 cC a1 a) ,J -0 c — \\ rt `1 d \ rl t CU .0 0 a.) .I..) --., , , qj „......) _...„) 1 ,,) _ . ...--.:,:..„, U v -v ° C o m n. o. QN 4— v O m U -a 4' a, ° -a -a .E) O w -I E +, .� 4, :a (13 O O U C -a = Q OV) m NO = = o = 0 8 �-a) CD N o ° " f -a v° C•— 0 .,P D y--) � -Cci 4▪-i CD D c n5 >. -0 ° a a) -v a) 4 a' Q•+- _c \ .0 O; I ; n E a) a' >..° - cu = c To+4 23.. -•* '' -2, -,R, r\ 1. ,:ri O co aJ I 3VI A , - a, 41in 41 a 2 o , In {J V C '\ . i L {d O > ° / ,Sys 7 a) U is 76 O T. O ( ♦ / O �O U H a) •� .> O O. a1 "0 ° a) 0 c in c6 c to° c c a — .n C 0 O cU L _ 0 N C a O •.P v- ✓ a) c° •� 40 O ° v 'T4 Q O , ,LAC a c) a) -- c' L N _ m. • >- o o a a • o a, a c - `P tP --- - ) i cu O t jj n n ° ro as L --, u a'' �? ^' J O Ou ) ) a cu waI '4� - ,,, . L N L ma L =\ 4, l, L Q) ° +� �( C � I 2 2 a, 2 ®_ we 4- >. L. 4-0 � o06 C4 C co c 4- 0 a +- q�, E g a 4- 1- Q. a v) 4- v Q u -a +s a CO a O -- CU = C � •s -a-a -a E/ = i O a Li) C -a n. -a O N CO N E1 C Q a 0 E C U— O - Q O = p co I . I +-+ IL. a -a -a C U ca 0 0 .P D C ca •G a , \ .— 4-1 co - \ -a "0 — cu = 0 a)..c - c r\1 t -y '-'\ *. ' a a J , O F L a .0 C c6+- 0 .J f .' i >- 1• 3 0 " >` a — -- O Q O .4___V_ t, H co ' J. \ \ +' C ar F- CD a � c a s a) 8 a o 5' 3 0 a .- as 3 3 -. o ca o 3 vs al ai a (3) C7 4-, t6 vs "0-..O co a O u) O] u' C C L. +.+ O > 03 C 0 cu CD (13 C .c o > To -.- C co a- w Q.)N V ca c6 P > O co p 'cC Y 3- i- i) . ( Ua▪ J - a i a a a, C v► m C m o . c, C a c _ C p C U 1 ' ^1_ vsa. . o + " �`�;`' 4- _ O � „ Q o _ , J 4-- 4- c 4- V _ co 4-, 4-' 4-' 4-g 0 0 -C.--s "0 .. 4\ [ ' . A. --(2 ',--' . ' , O 3 ! H4iJ �j. N A ;G a a a s a ar= a C 4- c� •b L L �� � � � a C N N `. 6 rr N C :G a a a a W m a c a.0 o C.) r� ( I , ``�r. v1 J I . a CO - = _v :0 73 - ,,„+-) j , - %-r) ''' 'j - -a u- Caf7 U , c c 2 = i c •-•-• . - ,,_, ••, 0u NV o a Q. II 4- a) cm C " -a 41 a +Ja -a c a za o Q. �coNC o 0 aO o co J N o f 3v •+,c° D o °C co ' l� oa ` m 0 aF3 v II a ) a U = I O y7Y � �I�� >s ii Ca.) V ? c L fo O r \ v� _ ic.,....... ;* iiin fa ,o �, N c„ 4.., ca -a CU a CO o ° > o ° `a f° N V co o > O co O 'ca a) cao �° . . ; 0 Cca N cn 0) co U ' s. � cU i • v C 00 c ° ooho - ) , l .L a C o o� J 2J W 3 a 0 a) `3.) cu E cu > > a).0- Z c)S N1 ...„ , C- ---Lif 0 o a a a U a a a a) C -") 'rW -6 4-, o %.- ---2, e C F- C a o a o co L '� U) a) 03 a`) CD W= U)C 4- >. — r - . L a co a a �) (. W a) ‘-.1 i Y 'a c� L cn J V r 'L L .1 2? LL d O 4 S Z v J► S U C \ v 2 .0 o >•E C MP y -� Q. L a) a) N 72 v 4.. c vj �+ oh.,,---- C� ✓ cam.) 1 C o ro Q a Q"' V C cB 'n �J A 4... — CD t co 'a Cl) co a; -� O L1J 'a -0 a i E .( { = 0 aU C -a = Q -a 0 m (NJ e' C = O 0 E C u.v C) = = 0 u p co Ni oo cuDU C_ oa Oc 4-, a) 'a C U o 46 0 •P D 1 . -C C B ' ) 4-, co 'O � _ v c C cu Q t i 4 �.. ao y' C p L cc o >, ic :_'"E E t_u a, , c ro 4-, rti ± / O -5 a- ‘4 . 21 as 13 o .'"A '1:: ''' ) 6 2 ,3) > (13 ,:u _ CD 0 • ..0 as c o = E >-,.c \ -CC av a`, o > o = 3 `� 0 3 a 9� 3 3 N VI CU ° �0 cQ N a) o H O> `n I els C N CD O O > is ro CO �- �+ . C C ca L .0 co a1 C • V Ta O to •(7) ra f �1 O c�7 v Ti •O •> C � � „�jl >` a) v c a) > a- o E >; �� C C a� a) C C C 113 CU l- �. _ I :-- _ C ca ap O C 3 4-+ -_ /> ) _� _� 0 0-c E d - -, I-7 ,(' -5 i c--- 4- 4- 3 .�- v co 1 - •L o o o a p °' a'•c Z 3 • -� v a, ate, > o a,•O 1 a �. a� t ZIA V/ V) 0 V) r0 < '-rd l',) A'—lr U a) a, a) a, Cl) aU > >9 C v + g '2, *L--.E-- -, .r. ' f) C I-- .C L O 0 G.. O of "s• "f of in(o cn L S N l ;G 02 (II�) ai U) 1— co C 0 >. , ) N /4 C�1 ti .P a) aJ a) N of UU, Cl) i- . r', i CJ � — -'`_- O .0 C t t t= t cu t 0 v "-- -7 S T S �" .-7 v a .,-' a) ca = cv ' 1.-- `y Y ._ �i N J — � C -6 .C2 (I.,0 , 4 ______...._,____=____ .4.. „_) .., CO C o L . ,� �J Q v � n$ Q`r Cn J J V ° co 0_Si Q Ac coN . W -0 W 4° CO N C 3 O c CU °.� 0 C CU t NN co O ° a E Ts U pc 4-+ N -a C u CO 46 p I I = L O c >. O U alit •I•, co Q) - Q F, .0 . ' i •� 0 Nam, C) ? / -k... >- c 75 0-12 ° ' .1,/ - p ca > — '5 a) w co -p `� ., �, t o ,. ,c Hilihi I d 6-P A 4 3 3 V) a' v I' L .o �n iy' a aJ o t° '^ -a"a CO dJ a' O " > v' 0 c L 41/ — a. >o > iy ° c� Q .0 O > cB c 1 CO Ni N V p '' 2 re O_ 2.! +- v w >- o ao �� N �. t _,---- - t- ---- --i v ,( ....„..._ CU _O +, 4-Wai +j 'W 0 o t � ZW > > aj.5 .6-\ -.1. a ca + E0 CO .o C �. 1—o v (1 U --t L `11 Cr a-, 1•- 1-• H 1- a� 4 ' a' oO _5? - �� c vi vi vi 45 LI(11 vi L" 2 0 as co (Q al to c0 a O E.) 22 a' a, I' v= 2O 4- t d .c .0 ..c t t c n' cJ �± D _ CO . -J �. CL *. 5 a) 's I ‘\,) \ lj- (�C ,_ V a - , a) NE c a) c W v q _ _) C 2 Vu -Ts („c o to cx Q- QN 4— v C cc " -a 4-1a) co a) -6 y +a- C ca •o = O EI a CuO E C CCl N O o " p RSc *' a) N 00 O LI v c' 0 U O C '+- D t C U ca O c N •a c to p .P a) c 4„, co as -p >. a — Q. n t • M-- a = `'- a= m N >�O Q.C -ra 4-' [3,. , ' \\ \ ` a--+ VC I.) a� a) F tiHhl >' 'a O CI 5 v :r --P' 3 = 1� s O o E x >• C O > = a O a) i I YA. - -- _cc Ei L.. w 0 "0 O) CI) 2 — Ova I N +; -a a) o ul C Cu 48 o fa > c o ta _ o > �_ 0 CO v co O> > �a C ca a)C L t L cv p co t•— N U CO CO p > 0 +. ca e, (9 p 0 . H W O •> O Q (...) \`7. ''s \.) ,......34,.4 ‘:J A c c ci) --„., ,,, na) 'C r-,= 0 C O -it; — • O _qp ;' 4. ril vO v Ncum ..^ < NO c} g VI c Q a) C C7 a ot1 Q C u f6I4. ,� »\.C \, (`y a \t. � O O a) a) a) v a) ��) --� �' �' u' v' cn to v' g 0 ca cv ca (5 co CO •, co= O ,J N N, v i) a a) a) �cu s_ � a) aj N N� �\ A N N t .c t s r tc -c � la V) � : `-� _, i +- S c .)Q, Q 0 a t (1) < XI. 1 s CD C V v " 13 C o fl. a cn cn O Q) `a - -a c a, ca t4 w 4 0cu � aC :_ O a, U c o') a) O 0 o 0 = u a to N 0 co _ ': .p y•• .a -0 3 = if) a� a t _ -.•. +r 4.i -' L a) c u ++ C 7 ' V V > L ->-` c O s-•ca �, . ! �� O 73 .� >' Q7 c3 N O > - `� 3 cc 2 c CO _co ° .0 c re o o = E �c 'v ;-+ c : > a) = V �' G) a) . u 5 14 .3 11116, \+,v, a, cu 3 a) 83 co + J Q 3 3 c �' L ,o cis �' a +' 0)- ' CO �' N L. a o o c �� n) fa O p ca E -E > > TO Z ii! g cu ta -, 0 ,1 ) ,-- J u a u O •0 ca L 1N \„.., —>. a) N a 76 52 -if, 0 E V� a c Q.) , ..'m _a) "c ,,c 0 a 0 .f‘' 4 <` 4 - ' ' -,/ "1- --1--- ,,\? , i . --"\j . N ai V V1 0 Q a' Cu in wag \. '7 CU� 1 •0 _ra v cu ar E a > o v o Z � 'U Zr: .0 i Ili ea Ev) _a � � • - Lt N N V o co a 5. • p a) .� v c/ V 19 I - z Ham- L L .0 W t .c LE 3 - t +-0 F- F- Fes- !-- ++•O }' 0 .L C co co CO CO t6. CO'3 L a ° a) T. I • Cu -c .c .c t z c .c E a s 1cc- - c r (, - ar — �,, ,t .-- . J LJ a, ,� - . .�.., , < 4-1 a) CO _ .' J f `J0 ,:„.„.,.. _ 2 p Oo6 u _ I v 4J Ov �� , e+, 2 ., .,, n, . _. cu>.E c , ,, ii) , _. v.) ______.. ' ' •',, _ 4-, -a a) c a) = r J c� -- -4 Uj Q !, 4- CU c m ca " is +' a) ca cu O w -o a) To c � �C L + = 0 a) � C -a a a CL - o VI ap CV E' c 0 N o E c LL0 0 0 = 0 cI O ( a) t N O O° u f V U p'c � Q + J -a "0 c Co o p G c s c c al >. - — v a� i , 4-+ ca -a a) 0.4.+ •� O CU W .C1) E CO a) >,0 O Cc c� � ai c u ` _1-3 • >. CU 0v L c > 3 3 3 a ca a O / -�- G N 3 3 co c c cca " Q w 0 — OD a 0 v L. 0 23 2 r -C c 2 Cl) 0 3 •Oa N 3 ra N< b° v) id 61 11-1 )_ 0 1 r ...:- C v) cu a +� CO v, 'a-a - a.� a) O 0 C c a) cci O 0 > iv . i C -C > > ca c I to a 4.) / I ._.1- OW U to O > 0 cap 5'ca ✓� 1- NO �O 0 > N O .> c 0_ �� U va `� c a c O .p 'j tz _ I- 0 � \-•( i, J T Q :- ON O U ++ of a1 mCU �, 4� .co 2 �1:3 a + co •- p O O O O - ; n'.o z /t. 1 s %.., .1) 112 23 E i.u, 8 0 .c. 1:3 rj__ 1- /-<\1"....4 k O a) a) a aU O 3 \ -k, ,. 1.4_ H H H 2.) _ F' .,c ai O j \ ri O co Co ccaa 2 co ni m-a p CU s -C -C s -C -Cc -Cl L� _ N , l� N6 t` - 4 f .. _ au C � E •�-+ a) ., ., " ti }, a) co — cB 1 ) Q �t .. 1 0 ° c o aS -1' ",..;." t ., f >-,+� � u. u , I .c `� 0a ate+ - r � CO O A E 0 '� ---- a) v H o c ca 0 Q O. Q,co -0 s-' a) co O W 13 -a W .9 ,a; c C •L•tn = p a) CO a c -0 z — "0 _p c 0 C LL a) N NO O v0 Ov f V V of .c u4-.' a) -a V c cu VS O 0 i �� C .0 4+- .p "O a) w F m v Q'o 'C `<. �' 0 a) a) ' a) O ?+-' Q O ca aJ t c ca+' CD E i fC 0 , .) IC, , -0 v v a N - p QL. . j c ' v tD ++- 3 +a+ ca -0 O i ^ \y 0 > ' "- ' V) ca c c c� Q '+ S - 3 a; = a) c c_3c — c o = E -a L _c (I) aA p 7 a) N -C 0 � 0 a—I -Y L1 a) �O 3 'Oas a • °) 3 3 " " a) a C 3 � a) O L- .F, N I) N 4-' i3 0 'O G) 0 0 v) > c 0 CO L CU 0 > fa c� `• >` Q� V N �cy CD C a) " O o �? L. c.2 Q) a) vy c vt c b1DU _ C a °) d — c �4-0 h O + P Ci m d 0 ci ' v c \--) S Ec 1.3 *O a, a) a) E > ",+) � L t v) v) to -0 a) . +r O a) w a) a) a) a) 3-a C L O c E ,L 0 CO CII CO ti ;G cu CU a 0) CU_ CU 0 o a a ^) �1 n 1 1 ,ci) _'; ca \ L 0 0 >,. _J v,) ,,. --------s-----___v / 'is-- ns r o a) U II a = a t V "acra Q U -._1 o Q D 4_ t v) W m el ® a D aCU C +r "a 115 O aCD r•I ; +.+ a a a _0 a) CD 0= O 00 £ ) O LL+a) +, a) a a c i., to 4 O P D -,� O = P a) .) <-:::ri QJ CO CU 'O =_ v t � �- a a CU 4_ = m O Q� t >'• -pi a) CU C-1 = a) E•S to ; '-'\:, \ rSA c 0 < ..___)-1/4 , ,r, \ 2 a) a FU c ca . JD to = M CU L V ,CU = a a1 L m O 0 " 'Y to •— a a) o a vv) Q c Cl) 3 � i � 02 o Q) N Q; DJ CO N 'a to _ N °� 0 N O in o �� ; n +-+ O WI Vr U a CD cc OE 0• J ca Ca 0 2 :p P = O 'Y a) Q — CU • 01) "'"' c g aw ,a) "-:, )-.' -'- ,<. _,--_,---._f_. k - ra 2 <1' 0 2 ci) 0 O 'Q a1 a1 Q) a) > > w•O Z v7 to O W to -0 +a -4 L `� ``) L J ~�/1 a III-, Gam. � H F- s lam- +�-.� +L-' O i ..�-. iii. zt v a v a aamvi.) to ca ani C o `� (t` 4 A d 4., \ :G a) a) a) a, u a)� w 22 a) r1 fi ., aJ r .c s t t c .c C a,t ti \ d 'S _, >� HQ ate+ -t' `' . C` 1 v JL +a 0 - J Y 4 � O `w Lc ..` '-- O O O O )= U ,JvcC "I""=U m - o a o_ a. ¢N L - N W c=a (a -p a) co Lu _c O 'a a c +, to 4 CO N = oo 8 rLLvO = ai (NJ 0 a U c'o ° 0 C I . I a C i O O ai .c C cv+� O _ f L c V V 3 ? C 0 i•� 0• 3 �` = a) r- E =}, a E aII ! ! 1I1 73 = 3[a 0 , O N > 0 c C a, fC O co 0 ;�,, 43) U ea O +tea•ca cA a) u a) a) o O E a) -a a) aJ C v fa C co 0 z C0aJ vs a) - C -U L ) v, N c d . 0 y- J � O is a 462 ? O --' --' r i L ,..> 0 •' O I N o N > >0 a, O Z f 1 O 0 CU CU 0) CU CD CU CU > >. C (— -- 4-- .v ---:/i CE3- -1- /-) --, ( --) ---- cu a) m a, a v= WC 4- >... :G a, a, W a`) a) a,a' a) `a s a- a �� a ate' °_ ` ' s �� i ®� +r N a) co - fu '�; • Q i L a) C a) a1 \� \ E5 a) Q. L L 0-,--- V 1 \745: o -D c c '5 0 ? v �JJ ,J `1 V v -a c C 3 -a n aN O al `° -� c _C -° CO CD 4-IC +' c = a7 O C tr.-° n i co NO ° v O CO lir v N O ° o f -0 U co•c •P D 141111k. .t .\f a) ( ^ -a w V' '� O N a.) `� 3 aU �`o l "44 a. 4-1 4- ` ill= -0 vl .2 ra. .1,`Z 1) -\A"<„ cB 4- ,a; ca a ° izt 1. � O > 3 c� c c 0 N. 3 ca a, v a) - a) =C Q., c) 4a Q —1113,— 3 3 a) 'al ,, O in f6 2 0 ca) 0 4" c C (i — _' O > i 0 i J> C . co amC CO > c au -lE r \ ✓ U L L 2 > i O O +-' lC v v ( O —CD a a)FU > •> OO Q-E C ql -1 - Ta _ c vs 40 ,+ C C a5 a) ' a, c C O c U �., ),..Ai9 , A- \/, � in 4, +Oc �_cp Q L " 'n w �1 . - C Qa a) -- 'J 'V to G ( V N.c `)-.) 13 >. `� o o g o a) a- c S E ----- a..c co v I - , _ (per . U Na 3 >` C _, `1,( n �1 O a) a) � a) m � �J � -� Lo C a-+ I— I.... �-- +C a� ai O 0_ n O �-� `2 A :G CU 0) m a a) ,_ � c o >, ( CI L_ 17 U 'V l� � Cl)L N aJ s S �� I-Q fir; .tom n J ' 1 1 (i) a"-- . .\ A+-+ -- 8 !,-.r ch& - C _ CI) �, 1 �,4- — O 4-) 1) \.) --.:, ....______ _____ e:', t) ,) CL) 'ate.. o o = V J N �. LJ 4- v C -a I . a co a) O W co -a -I aU C 2 -a °� co c �co TS; co *' .L N ..0 N O �O •0 V 0C�c t� ^3 �-1 N -a "O C o C 0 pC C V G C -C C co,C al >' •j a) < ..I 4-+ CD -a ai 13 3 _ j �'+C•+ ,ram nifluli ___514-,t r\_,‘c 3. ---._ . i s- a`) 0 3 -a 3 r J Q •wp °J 3 3 ay v `�+� v iii i O —►� 3 N a m C •N .a}+ 5 CD U `11 co ;G Y -2:)._,. > > C co a) ? a) 0 N °i c C> > O O E •J }I ::i , 1:1)C C a) a) 4" C -- c To 0 c ,Z '''' MO ° C = — -7. .... . ghqk --, 4r: 1 ....j ,..,...2 " \ I aim O 11 � J � � > �J � y a) - .0 4� E +p., >O 0 CU ° z { p p a) a) as a) as a CU Cl).a C J J - cv /�� ��� as 4 N _c _c .c t cu .c- t L- au.c Sf ' (1) / k,.. -NT J ----/ -.\) 4-a (-.- . 14- --L L.,\_. : \ 4_, ft) (4_ = ...,ecu .13 -irt:; . 4_, 0 \...\...... i ._ . .._.4_, v) , ..._ ..._ 1 ,.A S N... 0 +�-• -6 p p Q 0 � K. • CJ U -d o ( Q Q ¢v U 4- -v a) cv a; O LJJ ''' 'II aa)+ C �' 4-' ' = O a) 4 C -a 5 fl. -0 O N m O = o tea) o r ��w 4-, N 'a O u as `'' p P n a -c c = to A 'a O .P .P a) ...... +-0 a I r° '1:3 — CU — C) CU.0 2 ,Ly.,_\i, ,- O 4- -a -0 Wv- = el cu m's • Ilik flHiu 'i cO Q - � C= a) a) O• a) 5 3 r Q •OD a) 3 3 " cil 3 ai —tn `° o c— o 2 N 'a' v �O in 113 C 'c Q) fa 46 O > iy cC Q) V . O > 2 (� Ts +'_•+'� 0 __ 8 O ci N O •> O-a ., S . I c c 7-u a) (..1 43) .. c 0 0 0 ,,.. ,..,\ ,LI ,..421C Q Y O 0 5 = � c a)co -' N _ )---"-- r4... 0 0 0 0 a) a C s_ ..0 z\y s j `� 4 L N N N CO) VI tQ '0 a) a••0 r- �l ) .c ..0 s a) t .c .c c >'a i 4-, H- F- f- - O 00 a. a . . . )C L aid o as as as as CO arcs o N `� d C� C)) c) U a,• C ate,— CU c 4- >. cj f v 1J Co. I o � C -d w- 0 V A ai +-A CU C a, 4- aZ $-- Q O ___C ‘,' x (4'' ) ‘ - = U L1 I , 4 ) ki ,s . 4— a) C_ coc� -o +-' w CO CU t it °+�, CO C ca •o v) = O aU +./ C -0 = C. -C CO N e1 C = as 0 E c �N O = m o U o co _.4-1 t L N Ov co C c� 0 0 C u ca 0 5 fa CO - O U a)0 ,pp _ `'" 'a `�� to o Q L ` ', k a) S Uit >. -,:, cu u c V a) E-� •• • 141.111 -. ._ o >. 4 , 0 ? NI. A2. 4 w cu -C E ;),,,,,,, 3 342 Co Q ` * i , �,... � � c - ca " - as � C o = E -a �� Its„.:1 41; v }' ' ) Wobi � Lkt) 1 ' C i) :a.) a) O -.) -D 3 ti � o-iti y L o 73 N cC o> > �a 'C - (0 Cl)c C 02) V TO L > O co o �ca (.9 _ ° o _ta° a a' � o a I�, U a) 13 a' v °J c in 2 CO ou O a� o C v \ C C a� y, a- N O ?o is lit < a) O ` � vvi In C Q amira cc — — C o�1" O a� a� o a> > > a)o z �' 1 a) �� �L.L t N fp 0 fuco'> a~iO Nam' • u a) a) >• C O O H i-- t I— c - ++ N O 'L C f- C L a)O 0 co co co in co � co o co :G 2 1', L T. Eu,� - a) t (- 414 N -C .0 t .c t t= t aWi c u 0 � C6 � , • ` , a) •C j j a CO Co - J �" 1 J Q. p O kJ__ �jKi f.+ >. U N p OAS �� u U i S � os o tea, v L a1 U O . oU v -o C o co , v kr- CDc c u - +' a) co 0 LU ca € c a; c 'O co '° 1 t0 '% O cu C -o = Q 'O p cn CO N c c D al O E c "'ai O 7 O O v 0 _+- N N O o f 'O U 00 ▪ - II 0 cc A 'a .P • a a -0 a w = CFI vO_8—m 0 ) \ \ . 1-- flflh1 CD \� \ ;mil. ---7\Ny.7,p,n = Z Q .� 3 a, 3 3 i ate"', .a° CO G) O W -' N 0 in 110 a �• 0 4-' 0 al > = O ca C Cl3C 0� - C (a ( a) U O co -0- •F a) r O 0 . a u 0 •> p 0 f�- C C -05 CI) til ' 'a c 0 c U \ 74 S- QY O v uvi N c aa) \� — .0 17'13 13; t15 E +111 ° ..o ..._. -ci_ 0 7., c ''z,.- ._ 1---:÷'__/\Q-1 e LL -0 O 0 ( W � � QJ � V- -5- i C t-r- � � 3.� c . - c � ._ � 1 O ca cv ca CO CO RS ... ca-a O N N ..c _c t _c _c _cc .ca�i N a) r- ram- r j ti Q 4-) a) ca _ i i.,) ..j 1..--1 \--::__ \, _. --� U .L o E a a; j LQ U J C:O c + 4•- 43 c ca a) to O W -a '°ou i' +' .a 4' pp N a O E c trio N N o o o c "a U _ a = o �� t...j>.06 4:a.: it.): "tim 1 z:-Lai>.`-: 1 :: I c.cica: 7+44 24-'I -c.e -3:3 �► L 3 ics y- :i �J v 3 a�i c ca r- ,i� '\'''.:t o -- "� N a) �a L v +, v J .0 C a) a) aL) o a) -°a 3 as Q 'tw a' 3 3 " vs a) `—°C VI a) w I- 0 N `n CU ai +' VC N -013 C U cv 0 > `° ) o `a �' = .C > ca mc L ca a) o u sn a) > .> C a ., C c a) -aa, - C c to0 ( C a cI) J °CU .p . i VI 'j J V ' p Q.L - a = o o� ca) 2 w ; � - 0 0 0 Co 0 a) a C z �- rz co ate,, a2 E .2 -0 X) I-- ° - C a �/ d can N tn 0 N co `° *'' +�.+ " e. - ate.' F- F- 'C I- ate- 'W a) `°o a. ^y-' ci O c"' c a"' a ato 2 `, p c-' c,( ;G CU GJ W ai CU W a) CU C a >. cv ' c CU .c .c .c .c .c .cam .cai �N a ` ( � p -- �- — --., —�- Y fa 1, Y —E O OO 0_ o: c; r' 1.;am (;) ,,,• ;_ V �!` VV cS c a c ,..i C co 0- 0_ a N L,0 4_ a) pri com. -a + a co a O_ w -.CI O a ,:; C -0 O 0. ' 0 ,_- 00 O 00 ovE coo C u' ' N O .� "p C..) p c 'I? , C -C O F to A • O U a• w \` C. ._ 4-1 a' U 2 a 11tH te a •� Q ..CC CD s_ aU 0 3 •0 3 c \"•-• 1 CU o > ao > o C .0 >713 co c -G c▪o a c - J O V o co O 4•RI c- � a a) U _a °' c a O � � , 0 .—I i-ts '.(75 r13 4-0- 2 E ▪. _• _ ..., ..... , <.,.--, ,_, ,..: ...._. _... z a, c OD .113 0 -0-# �j co L U� 1 p O o o O cu a a - Z % ` r- _ -j Lj C c ,2 ai O G_ �' O a a a s a a`� a 13 o 2 c" N tJ �; N ay co a r tv �y k Ni N , a) .0 ..0 .0 _c -C t� .Ca L �� - �,-_.__ 1 C v .f ------1. ,,,_ ro 1 gJ c = .s3,- \-' s'i, --L--7....< 3 1.*- CO co _c 0 W +.i e: a . r, ___ , , :::, 4_, D-- -..., Q C -o a au C � = e;L - � G 74. Ca. m V v - 4-IC -Cic 0 c ca o Q Q Q N ' a i `i�1 _� W ii - +C+ a •ru 4... •C.N v • �• m O E 'mo-10 w cl _ S N O 0v u E -0 V OC �i a +-) N -0 C v c `0 O _ �1 C t c C ca >,• -a O c' .v "E 4-+ Cl) C U a-' N E C f ' .i..i`v , ,, 11111111 E. .o v, m +� ca vn .a i a) �cu 0 InO> CO C O > _� C .0 O > 73 C . co as v V O > 2 O O .,- F3 O ,O V W ._ C Q. , +•, U a T O E / y a) -0a) cin I too - (`Q tY cc = C L NC ' O � > O Jri` CO i v- N = , \iJ sr,p 3 —+ � 4- 0 30 O d C z CY ��,- .._ d O a) N w of p O L a=.+'a 4 E 0 .� :13—<-4- 1 1 _ +� I— 1- F- I- C N `O L Q)c ��1 �/ 0 co ina CO CC CCC . CO13 o- _\ ^' _ tf -,r. lv n1 o- � -a I--a fi _. , ,r ;„ 4 _� ''.'.••••.6....4..... J LI- a) J ,'y ci — ° Q. •� a) C a ) i C c. s- "' JV - a c(13 o _ a) -0 c Q n a 4-1 O a) }; C = 0. o`� j N C C -0 m C O c0 T. CU `r.�` O u O C._ r N O O C V o C a-+ Cl) -0 'O Ort, u to O p -,, j' � �:� L -� 1 a-J L U C c.) a) E Ctio r \ . °; a"' a m c>- ° ,o ra O ' J' a O > = '� 3 v, c Q ;_ .'---s \ 3 3 w a) ._ c� 3 C O ) r .•C C , a) 0 3 •a N >;a ` N vs _a) a) a-+ to vs 'a � � � .2', O u, 5 Cc C O C O > iv — to .G co C ,.0 cao a) c d1 U cC E 0 > 4, O 0_ .� i �/ V = O 4_, U ti a) .> c Q- > _ ---, Q) ▪CU> U O O C vs a1 O I . a O N a C C CO CU \ ' .J r .. C C mot' Q • •N 0 _U2 N = C Q O Q) .. v (Q 2 q L7 2 N O U �+�, �, 1 c�v ___ n �"1 -O 3 u c�- , •oa O O o 0 0 a) a) c Z .._ 6 -- e_, O -O a; E °� >o > .� c _ > '� L , O 0 N a) a) a) cu a) >-> C r- ----5 r C (- C ) O O as alto N CO is CO, fC-0 o r- op .G C) a) C) N 01 W.0 a) = -— i , a) L .O .c L .0 t O .0 a) N N -- - \ -` -, _. (v - �r _ N 0 t Y s a) .J 4... cu re ...Z• CV .\ S `7, ( - IN � — ks M .CO CI) L \ , � ,' \yI a E CO / V c) cc c $ `o a- CI- Q N zi v ac 0 C C- o (° 'a -CS 0) = . ri, O a) Ca) N C c = O E cis O = a O = vV coc•NOO 'aE -0 oL C c c c co _A -a o o F, sty \ ..0 ,,, ) _ co , CI) O U a c 0 8•fC O V 1 /\,.' -- \s ,, i ,-- ,c U 111 3 3 co O 3 tv c › a o � I \ a 3 3 U1 a) a) I ,�, (J co 6 a)a O v, O H C C C i. 1 L.. C - > co c L = co a) J G U i O co 0 •� a >. C) " a1 — c co — to O F —� C) a a) c v> 03 C o0 G -S asi - c U 0 _J 'co ccotg, o u) 0 ?O , 9 to 2 •Q` C7 '2 a) O u °a tco C ___\--- 2 r Li -C *o +a .Q yO a a cn in o cn ca - , " .-: (°-- a) a (1) a) a? a- > a C , 11c- H -c I— 'crp 4-1p 's_ OVt v1 v1 ~ V) v1% Vf L d G C.�" �� C(�� co a) �' �t 1 �— a� .0 a a, .0 a)� a� a) - C3 e� S c „.` - v - a 3 �� 3 O F-a _ — M M CI. L-t VI\,V . 1 E •c -� °1 . °' K o 'a c c c aoi V \ 1��` w W .,� .. c.) c % - • n. a Q ini y-. u.t ii m C 41 C -a 2 m O C u c vl u� .0 N 0 -a 13 U o c C t c c (0 >. o LTh `'1. 11111111 co i 6. .�..r c c z > > -Q —.c c CU a L L ai o .1c . l LCP] > c- o H C c c o a) co 0 0 > M � C .0 > > c L 2 a)_ u o 9 a. aoi _o .5 'c2 o U a) >. > 00 O. U 1 NJ 1 >. CU ai a� oI .> a� ro E C C a) o "' E c c o cv 1 Q J [a CO w y = j� •>O mil' �.+ , 4 ,, .-- ....,,ia"--- •L u OO 8'O r/ •J v '1k A C G a, C �� 3 'C OOO 15 > CI- C '•t� � � 'Q O o CD a7 E a) > aJO \` ta: ...0 % 4Fal it; E 46 0 2 _. E.:0 -0 % , ---, ,..- -4_ .., ,, ,_, 13° a a) C ® bJ i s s s , .c r .c 3� V1 to• V! • o CO ca i R t0 ca al-a C 2 N "6 3 3 3 3 3S 3U Nam` ---.—i ,_ , ---,---).., ,,, ,..._ .,\., , ` 1� \r,\ 41- f aIn 1 c ,- ) — I-r N \ \ co C O V a) i-+ \J p�' it ��;\ . 0 •0 "6 c 3 a)0. B to U _ _ `%" = 0 a) 4; C -6 = 0- 'a o CO N 6" C Q a) O E C u L co 0 NIo °v o ° E -o v °:� Cu 0 "4-+ v 'O C i ° O IP ...0 C >' al ~ „ tB0 C) cli'C - � � QF+ • O a) a) = 3 a) >-o O.c....) \. 14c..) 'C'Q > N C V C (O}' •y Q 0 > = 3 3 +� cU '0 ° Q Cu 2 a) 3 v = L I , R��1-°aa)in 4) T11 4.° ra 0 "C:i '.. 1-4 11/ � C a) f0 p O > iv CO ca `I c = D a)IJI 'n cu C C O C V �q .._/, y--- l's" o O O o O a) ; v.o Z ��� a) tc::)) \) 06 __,----) a) a) CI) a ° �' j 4, i__ i_ ..._ 1._ 2,. a 0 ellikit.... , n a tri 0 (a f0 co fa t0 , (3 N \ \` .. J p L �4-0 � � J . � o �E _ of \Ij <S 0. ac L vby v41 Q - . 1O � = = a Z� NIU t) -v � o M O. o- a v, 'I-- ri,CU O co " -D4-,+ a co a 1:- -a c +4 0• 3 CV 0 = o 0 = 0 � CU a N O O L' f -0 u of c t c _C m >- -0 lc! a 1 j, / ` �O N .0a8 t c a (C:13:1)) ▪ , a E. � \a =a a a ca p a a 5 a, a �' ".- E = ' �� ' \ - 0 > 3 > 4 � � 0 < � s � _ C o = E i j 4l a = 13a O a ++ 0. 0 Q t 3 3 to a @ F.? E' — O co CU T 0 v., o i C �� f CD fII O O . O G 'U }+ L O o U L 0 a u ca r/� \s� a atc'-‘sf >. O a) �' c c woo K d_ C C N N c c c ✓ . 0 _ ice+ "Co O •��+ ,, V CO l'3 2 c p o.a t � 5 J � L L a O Or a 4- 4- 3 y- V a�' cC • > o 0 0 oo o a a a.5 z 8 t N c r) v o N c -a F- a-, 0 o 0 0 a .0 a, t t - -E >S� - � h F- F- Fes- I-- 4-0 a-' 02 AZ 0 (S 0C o a a 2 a a� m-0 o / L L L L L L a L cO a s .i^ \ V A L + a) j \ + z _a c 72 E...1 4th., Li. J. --...,) __,_, 1 .s.,),....KI , .„, Vv oCOa `7U -6c Q Q v O a a +� 72.2 °: c c O'er in NO = = 0 = LI O ro "� _ CJ N O o a u c• t ,;- +L+ C� y 'O C 1111 !: w c '''''' 0 cu a) -.E cu 2-.2 cl----- - 4-;NI L �` _ N 4- N �- 0 > -5 = `5 2.,) CO 'V - NA ' 2 a) 4§" 1 co :tu' 11-3c .5 c (a u .-,,, ,;:-9 al ! • wW co CV to O O > io G O co 41 c ...c > > �a c T. *_ C c.) i o � O co o . . Q C) "0ca ar c u: co c too ....)4 ` - > , l SI c c °' N �C a = C o c U a `. fio .oN aim C� \ 4 - `1 cot a 0 •2 % o � `s � �s� " � L 1�, _ p aJ a� > > a'o `� � --� -a cu .. 4-1 - \.....,.... - ,-->._ I a cv t.3 cuiv a ai 3 C 0 vi tic' vi '= vR v;c ." a. o C- • Ci .c .c -C .c .c ...c .c a- N CIS 7 e4 CD oQ � J: \ .2), c , ,j. 1_4 ....) t to 4CCz-L. -IS __;2v0—>..... 76' n " ) Q—\c]- j sl j L T i . W +a _ . ,_., ( -Je._..) ---aF E g v 0-cu II O � ✓ \ U O W - -6 0 ro +a) cc) 4-+ j \V 0 a) C - = Q 7 O CD N c C = of o E C Li-o O = = o v 0 co '(NI o ° E -0 u .0 am o �, . +-+ a) -0 7. Ca u p a C ..0 C ,- >• 'C � ai O au F E E asa) }' �. Ci a, °' a c o L (o L 00 > = `� 3 3 co II Q `� fit i , lli a) 3 a� I fa c .C- (fin •c a) a) a 3 lA Q wo 3 3 3Ln " a' T. o 4-1 _mil M N a) o in o> w C � � O > O C .0 > co C> " T � a) °' d c a) a) ai - C o on © l ,/`, 5,_ Cl) `n C Q N o .P •>4- b �, 0 —I c6 CU p C ,=, if 0 Off/ ► cat •Q w 2 o u o E ". �„ t t/7 cn N V N CO 'a a) . 4-0 �1.' � L.. a) A C J C "Imit3 4.-1 \ t b /1-2‘' — C .L a) �, O vi V1 to vi in(p vi L ,,4, .G a) a) a) ) of 4-0 a) E s- co °J ‘ N -J \J z3 1 J (g a) .0 C C .0 .0 t C ..0 _ a).0 p fa- S � -6 HQ +. & • i .. _ c�( v r4 ���\" _ Lj i �" \: a...► _ to — CD 1jb cl •- = p CZS 4-%,,, • C - .0 tL 0 c .Ico c ,co _c O ?E C _•1i... ` -, �„ .� ‹ € O aU _ = O N ..-4 CD CV 1 = O O E c �c C) = = o u o CU =+� - N ° o -a v O = 4••0 -a C u to =O .G D co - "a cp �' w © U a)c 3 a) O-+w = • a) F ` E m QJ A O Q i o f au c u +� _ c " `'` r „ ,` y Li = °J E•— to >' ar a' �, a Z.' o o O N4 O > 3 3 °; CC) o - _, (., Q _ Q •Cup °' 3 3 " VI a) `—° p 4 3 a, a, L .� �. C V) c, a) .W �, -a a1 ,4; O cn O, `n = fa _ ,}., O > 'co = O CO CU CO C O> > To c co a) L [Q . O ca U p 0 —j>. v O 5 C cu 13 cl) — c IA co c to 0 ,- '- 9 ‘" '.?".- --.. 2 r ,.____ , , ,e, cn. 71.5 cu L" a O "- -'� cam, '� O —1 :CO m o o Y O •O t�i '�' vvi N `n •a)GD ! �� r'- )' Q - CU N •- to C Q.v '‹ co 2- 0 p p o p N 0) a c z j *f4 CI- ". �.) > .O o ▪ t tie, trl tll 0 LI) co V3 5. 1—1.1 a) .. p, a _-_-s-_,---__ -4_ - -- +.+ I— FI-... I =F.,C a) a) O a . O tC (O (6 H L co f0 (p-C 0` / (ISw_ . J 1� J cu , u. 4. L,9 0 >. • 4 , N a--,. --..- _ 4-, >.'E C , I ).\_'‘ :II C - , - vo Ctc U ca - o_ Q 4- N , cj - CU 13 ' ru OLJJ te .aQ t0 a-I a` �.!= +a - COp O CU c a) pEcm N c m LT_c ) O c O o v O co +-r \ "C a) N o ° -oa E 'a U p'c \l ++ GJ -0 •a C c�j c 0 0 C -C _ C to �.. -p U Li * " •— 0 tea) CU `G `3 L a) aj T O C LL '''''E4 ^I flhII :! !il = - 41, iik \ ' \ A = -a .-I +•+ c C = > a' O a) = O a) - L Lj _, ,�- °� .0 C s- a, 0 3 -0 N 3 CO Q .— 3 3 U �, v Ej ca p C in a) a) L +,, ca a; LA o N o as o 13 •c J i ° `a _ _r- U O > > O ca c� C7 _ o o U in a o c o. • ° a) a - O aj a) c in C brs O Fes, Q\k �, _, J N C a O .F "5 il N o \ l Q p 0 ccj `—' n N = aria—co ova _ - CU CU _ ° o.ci,) (") 4 Y ,jam '1� ,+ co 2u CU 4-1 13 V- "- C a� U lip c CO . S --�' Q.•L p O O ° O a' a Z ( i Y 0 W CU CU E a) > > a) o c.,, f t), c-C--Y ---H. --- - LL -.}C� I P.., E ++ 2 LM a) �. L Y N N so vs co -a aJ 1't 0O a) U a) a) I .- C 1 1 O as ca R tII co as (a-a p , --�...:( \ C,- aD a) v a of a.1-5 v E L°1 '�. A ` o0 'i 4. _ _ � � V �� c - _ LL 4-0 0 U ^J' :IN 4- (� � �' az O 0 1 1 -0 c 5 N U U �� U v -a MS o QN Ne O w '0 c - oN ^ � LY1 N E c = a) O LL 0 ���--X000 .4 , v -0 c U as 4- o D \N Q. s \ o -C c c co a ° .Pa, .... ... ‘,.4 :? j. N UOH i fBO > co "co 1Aj Q hA 3 H v.) a � o 3 CO o ca "' -� CU CO O OO 0 p `_ I c p v N .O 'j c Q - ,U �� N i a) a� CU c ;n na C ao o `S,� `), 0 L °; c a co c cp c L._ _C o +-+ • \� 1.---, a) ki c c_a) ., 1 c* tJ in 4 y-- 3c t a) c� ,2, N, A , ,,.,,,: „„ I 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 a„ aJ o.. c z \� . �J • h __, :L. _c rum mE (73 1.. t N N O (n -a aJ 0 0 a 4.- LI-- -c t _c a .c .cE ,_ .� 0 iN) _ __t.. a,CO C a E c z--- , 4 ,.; , , ,.._.,„---- aLo V Uiifl ! n.'+•• v O co a)' C mo+� L 4-1 o a a' C -0 5 g •0 ON I J� N C = O c0.,) 0 c LL a) , (33 N O "O 73 U O.- i O = a-+ a) , -0 c u O p .p D 1 1 C � t a) 1 ); c� 0 t•I 1:) "0 W 4..= Ei 2 0_4_, = . k4=3- N t >• °; '' o o.� O I,, R r o 76 — = = al '4- •15 E = tli i - a, a) C F3 8 < i 1 , > O O O -C C Zt a) a) O -O = > (ato.10 . i _ .J O O N. , _ (rs 0 0 > -tu , i _. c _c > > 73 --E rt),_ 2 'f:, a)4E' ::.> _ca -;-> eao ,,,c4. --- _. le, 4_, ,,,‘„) in a) -5-, c o. .._:... E a 'C a) N c co C 0 O �� Y . �l1 C C a) cu :" a) c c O cU c)J C/ iti .+ N v� C O w ._ . • n, _ c C ra :--7--: i V ' `j \ r t2 f° c; E _g O "O - f a :•-v 2 0 -5 ±.- x fn arth a, ,....., , , o L--4 ...c (., Q Z il- c ai a) U a, ap aJ aJ10 T C '..H O H h-- s ac-, E 0 'L �� ,r 1 1 - 1 O i o l Ji t t t _c =c .cE sc- \\ 4 t \ ' � \ i, N 4-, a, ca _ co � ' L ` a, O O �-- 0(> >' °� w,,,i 3 _..c. ,r, '.,' co a) c �. I • c• -a O ou 4. k Eo QJ 4- a-- L- 0 M> o v 'ac C 0. 0. V 4-1 U rJ ,� .D C OQ O C fQ Liy.. fC 'O CD (o aO) a C :'W (.1.' ) to o o .= N 0 o 4-1 N -a 0 C " (a O 0 D U ` J C - = a)-C a ..., eill i 0 > -5 = 1.4- f-i• CD 1:3 E = 3 4') ki b- - 11H1J l. iii. . . -o xCU —5a , ' NIP fp (n . CU 3 4,, 3 cn cu a..' Q aA 3 a tn cu 2, o .—, caN 3 a a' °' o C c'a ,-------'--- co a 4-' o a _ � 0 o , al o o > - o G `ate .� a L _> o t N V To E 0 a u O O �' CO C7 — >, CU 0 aa) >. .� > o E C) '� as O O C w CO C to O (. \ ! D _ - a) GI "' a = O o ._ 1 / > a 4- 0 J ;co � 4- �-+ > 0 U '1 2 f ,' c Eb as o C = +, ! r �;,� < YV a) o o ti N y tn aim -ti— .! - , 1 ' C .0 493 E m > o a) o 2 ,J J �- o �• �' �, u- 't +° + '4 E + (5 >. F�- O N �� 41 (n (n o U (o _ ti F- F- -C '— +.-0 }' o O i ti i- o a L 0 N 1n of to of(p N L G Q CO CO CO milli' 0 CO (6_ (Q O c1 ,r,� U1 � aJ O N w1— �1 C 4- >• f l V'I fr\ v s s _c �- a) 1- aU_C \\, . �► a. 's > >� s-c tom-< ,� • 4 c, — ,�_..., ._ o � \� j ',... -J a a, co CO L 1 , J ___:: ._______ . 1. ''t-,'‘ ':/‘NN. _ O T� c � 7 . V \ ( _ U V -O -u ( o c Q Q Q c" �`' J .. �+— C C t0 cn f' r 0 f co mi 'Q C C t t6 C ON a N = o ° cc o E c " a) t (NJ O� c� "0 U O�C �-, a 'O C 0 ( 0 FD 4-1 ca �• = U cu� 'J •° 0 Q ' • m a) >.o Q. .J ;� a) +� 0 �, a .0 C To+., ca > 4- ra c ° <C J5; t 1 2 a) U . - /o W � 1 can C a' cc C -C > ca - L G cc 'E a1 COUp > �O O O +�.a'fC—C �� p �y �> C Q 5_________., >,. a) v N a) c N •> O E F�:a) -a v w C v, ca C as O U '` csN (" C0 J 8 to t� "' v, > `\ � � -� �, CO 2 Q C7 2 % § O U O E < L >' o O O O O w a) °- C z �' v ..� `� c. 0 0 a) a) C) al ai a) a) > C �\C , C \ 1 1L 1 W 0 itl 1 0 a a a " a a -- CO"0 o 2 ,v _ _ N LJ L c Q) \p tv .-- L.-1 / t' i. 4-1 J Li- = _le _o -6- . : 4_, ._ Q. 2o � s 06 ' -go i --.I , i IJ C -a -0 0 V N — C MI t O 01 D� '� ,� L a °�' ai E n " ` v V V 'a c O co Q Q Q N �,`! J V 4c) a) co - - 'a co C a) (a„ r " 11 0 a) +°y., C -a S Q -a 0 cn co N E C a cu O E C �17.3 O a a o O ca a) -C C.) C.-) 'a N C C o C \ +-0 a -a C o o .P D 4 a 16,, kliN Ilk >' E 1 a) 2.15 v c (a C L S Imo O > w 3 3 ai -a `Ilt \ r, 4- (a C C c� Q (v > 4., -,_� m -- CO 3 ,� y j` \; 1 �I il let -Ai . 0 -0 5 CU ‘ 4 No* N Q 12.0 3 3>cu 3 a C a ,• o 1 1 CO „ ° ° o "' ca L — ,a, +, O In > C C CV o o > 0 > ra 0 C c� > c +� C V O c� O .F3 L7 — p O o > a0i 0 > C o. c * 0 -a a °' a) C 0 vo C ao 0 C = a v U) v C C 0 CV A • .J (C O C �O.r — a)Q Y o o v o N C a)m 1 r%� lb. . , _.k... IN . . c. y.. 4- �+- c0 al 4- UCU CI- C ca Itlit•0 .Q W +) a; E ate) > > a, O Z 4% t.t_ I o � . � 4 t o cu a) cu _ell 0 a) a) a) a) >- C =• O Fes- H t 1-- 4--+6 4.+ 1- 0 a .i) aj0 ` 1 N (C (G (D cC CO ._, CO"a 0 •,�i 2 2) a) a)= a)) C 4- >. a) a) a) q) a) WI- a1 CI) N N 1Ili nl C.\ k 0 1 = -°v -0 m • +-I , l' + i 1 ' ch ` T f.,, ji ill it 1 •aci C '*- a, ��, ,� czi 8 ri 0 ---1 ---' a t.,-:, .., c_ U 0 € u c o o. 0- Q N 4— - a, (a 4, CO N C ai o E c / Q) I • • 3•�0 4- c, -0 N — Q� �{� 1 •— 0 ate, a, a= 3 m o �) 'r -- `c CD a +0 ++ G CV V �' '.' a, E.% L \ :17i.' ` VJ >, f\\ ' N ' - - .0 f° c c o E �. • ' , N aA z v °' u v- a, / -c O 2 2 c, Q 3 -0 = 3� I Q MO 3 cL)3 to au, d k. _o CO 13 CO CU a, o cn o Lel C �C o > CV > 6 c ,_ •.OG co CU*' ( _ L 0To co j„ u O .> u W r• N .> O Q 4 CI) '� ii-a, Q) c ; ) co C 4,0 0 ki 2 N. V a, a, N a, N o c U �9 (\l-) ( v c io °A 0 +� -� v1 r K' Q 7 2 :� e- "I N aim �, ., ,..? �k—, > 0 0 0 � 0 U � C CO S o a) Z '� L0 JD (o (c E ca O ` �C oy i �L. O O a, a, a) ar ap a1 CU > >' C �` �' 14- _ t t .c a, .0 t E -a '� C +-, 1— F— H F— 4 o }' L, 00 CL —r r�� vi vi vi vi vi(a vi "`' (� N ,-o f , t� O (a CO CO as as ., as-0 0 2 rd -, A O `� q ~- _ 'p a, a2., i, a) CD— a_, C 9- >, �6 CV c� Q} _c _c .c _c _c ..c .ca,t • n N t`�J l.'N 0 r► 0 l cA (4 `-4 c: Nci... 'N V • V w 4-1 +-1 a) co _ ra CI \ 1l !2 2 0 ry,, C • --1 a-+ A u_ O o2S f • J C . L a) 0 :p _ 13 c c .5 0:17 .0.-V) 'II Ay, \I ‘A(''•\ (--. i ,- U V c m 0 ca Q. Q v _ \ Q CO N E' C = a) 0 E C Z' U V 0 O 0 0 a= L CO a) N O 0 o'C +-J a) -0 O coi ro `6 0 :D t R C .0 c ° ca >. -0 ° Z P a) • _ .". O QJ a' " E a) a) >-o C. 1 , 0 >.. F C) C c13 am) +'c+ c ca E 0 f6 a 1 › :3 W (-) >- a) k' c 2 82,.., o — '.1:! ` c.) . `0 (= ) ,,, 4-01 al J N) % -'d 2 a) 3 _ as C 3 a as .0 C E) ,- 3 0 341.e 3 CU a .4 Q 3 VI a') a) .o \ re Q) of a a.E.+' 0 N 73 Lc) 0 _ aJ += O > C a co O 0 > O 0 I > > f= �-' s= Q) (, to f. °0 > 0 fa ° �._ Ur L 0 >, cce, o A a) ' a) a) C• ai — N a) 0 c In C 0 0 �` - S -..7 C �_ a) a) a) c C 0 C U - „� a v) 0 a 0 •� -r a1 0 't]0 O 44 y `: co 2 Q c°7 _2 3 o u m-c°, E - 1 -\ ° 0 0 0 0 a) a) fl C z 0 '� ,a; E +0.+ >O 0 .- -C y�, s � S s `3 LL ice, +f°•' ate' +�' co ID j, F—0 a) U `� ' I V) t/1 N O N a) a) v a) fy a) a) >• C y `L �� tom- i- -a w o n �� �'a) • O vi vi vi vi vi 2 {/i L L1 5 _ CO CO ca "' co ca ., ca'v - ,- l a' Q7 a a �= a' C 0 >. `', N , '7, L a) co a) a) lz \\ , y.' Y CO .— CD C 11 i 3 _i . 1L 0 L- C C r 'L L V I '� V O °v Q• L O J �+ Z c a '5 0 °a V J 0 v -d c o ca a. n QN C +' CU cv iH -u o•� ( ;. ( � 7) j - m. n, >. _. _. ..p ..p a) liw., ,,. j ......7 -......,..„ „si. -4 ._ 4-0 as - "0 — QJ — 0 a)_c .,.,) O cu I 4./ co i a, ._ C f°+' 1 >. I O u = A O p Lf° -a \ „ t U A N N `Q Q Q � ' I !�, 0 �` >' = a, 4- E = r- - -� 1 2 a) 3 3 '° a a c co ° V• Q So , „ N C = a, �' u a) = a, -C C a, v Si) 0 CO 5 � 0 Q •C 3 3 in 0) in aa) m �'vl �o i C v, v 4. a, o f° In -0.O __ J CO CD 0)c ...c - co c 3- :P ro cu'wc c-- .. ...r) cu U � � (� = p 0 v ° .> O a. 9 , 2-- -. 1 U v. C C CU a) (.1 a, -, c o c u (---) a) c O 5 4= X N = ai o0 aJ _ k" " v ? ° 0 o 0 o a, a c V.v �...42r� LL ��, ate, I- ° "a) i -z N cn tan O fn f° fa +-� N O 0 aJ a, a, L.) a, a, a, a, A C C +r I- I- F- D a, a1 O ., q °il ( rY ,I O CO CO f° �" f° to •, f° L O �, GI a, a, pu a, Q,a) a, E °' * \ -�N , 4 W y +a a) ra n IIJS J 1 = _lcP f6• {", t� r l a 2 •L cn O w 1111 ► daI � �co 4 0 >,c c ti '� �, �. a, ° u L5 V ,RCI. 8-1-.' ‘‘1-:( n , ., `) t...„ = C = a) C ‘ A c� -a c co O ca Q O_ Q N a) COcB � 0C a) co aO+ 0 O " am N c pO cLTC) = O ; oC a) ► +....C-+ N -a 13 C c ro O p + fit`_ +_-, co ca 1 A m — v a)= j ) 'l '''" 0 a) a) F E Tv >.0 a iNf k ',t: `... ill T ' 0111111 CUaC > -° X c bilk N b�u0 = ° c°i a :• ! I ' Al co a) aJ O 0tfl C C'a L a'' O > > C O to C .0 _> > CO C I. -,G c0 oo a)*' v V to O > 0 O a'C..,'� L ca O �° U in a) •> C O. S` c Q —1 co [o co o C 5 .> o r - c' a Q Y 0 p v N N ai cCn C N cot a . .,o � 3 rt, .` O ° aO O ai z " V L '' ! i !i11 ~ Q)a) - kc-,..) iti , 0 0 a) cu a) u a) 0) cu CU --.,. >'• , j" rt a O CO � o Ln a. co-a o� I — •••G a) a) cu N t t t s .0 tE CE a,t a 3 �•=1 � tea" .�; fi W - NJ i I if il t t \3 +� >, o o ozS 1`` I ,3 J E 0 L o 0 -.c -0 c_, c sa r 0 U%, . c.j _.,...) c9 -L)) `a QN a •a•- 3 rOLL cC 'a 'cLa-0 a) .- C.4-1 a + ca c 0 = pEcCx) N E' c a) �-a O z ° c.) p co (NIo ° oE -a V o_C -o °' C-'+-j -ac acuo ° ▪ D - � C .b.... c U ▪ t 4-1ro ca = a ,`'- O a ;C 3 E a a ›.o Q °• �O a c u '� C TO ( �1 •� ��� ° O I lik -a L., UaaU ° O? 1- z t 4- a-+ •,- ,,Ac:: CU "Al 2 0) 3 3 co to c u 46'.% , a ?, co C C >o ° E �' 1*L a LJ a O ° .x in •- a1 a y o 3 t„ CO+a <C 3 3 a �, L' L, o co CD a 6 a o co to -a z3 CIA Cl) p to to 0 v CD ,0 ° > >73 o 0 `o a C -C > > io c -P m a*' -- O V O > o co O n1— V p u a 0 > c Q- t� a) _a a c to m O to C C a N c b 0 O _.i _= ( :co co A ...., Y A, o ? O 'S \ li- Etc • c � L ° a°i °E a°i > > a.o z — = m pro E 25 H O 115 (vim i v cn N 0 cn to � a ate0 o f O O a a a a a a aE >� C c{ A, 44 O (Clvi o to vi to to N i C O co (Cl co co_ as"O p C a a a m a a_ a c 4- >. a) aU aD a) a, w CD e a E a s N �l J a) J \J hj " el C - - �' �U ,, T 11 g 1. CO C 0_ • ii 't W c 102 /% N,,gc.: r) e" NJ riN &. --.= V u -6 C CU 0 CO �- I Q N 4— N C as c) . a) co O w -a a) c .c 4.1 -a a) cn m N 4' 0 = w 0 c. o� c a, o E c � v co c ,•C c E al >• 'a — .G Q1c4 1�a \ • +� co 'a a) — a Q • O a) = 'G 3 a) *� O �. `� L- `.. a) t c to cv -Ft U V > a) ? f C O ('� N. 21 co 1111 to a) s_ of o `~'�c cn •C aJ ?� 3 fa 0 m 4-1 a) a � 3 W a) L ca a) a W °' 0 VI tti c-a a ( o 0 > In i > o 0 `ate 1 u 0 o 5 o 0 0 � II to _ ac,� eL >. v o o °' >• a) > > c E ` I.0 a, a) c li o a IY,A' — C CU C a)cu a) vi a, c o c 0 I �► O —� CO CO to 0 c — o —ff- a 5. Q Y o o N a)m a) v -.,i ( c' \�C a'' _ c c- 2 ' w E • o cu a) a) E d > > a) o Z�' �` 2 a +r f . l V A I.. t v.) (,) C +� F— E— I- H +'C +' 0 v; v; U, v; v;co vi�' o ;\ 11 a) a) a) W a) a, a) a) a) L— N �, _, 'V H Q +-; •ter 9 coo JQ 1 i i., )1 II II] r_4_, +-+ a) CO CO `� f = ....Y -0 eti...j . j 0. 2 •L° L o . i'l •F+ ca) oZ r �c 7 • te ' CO` c a) a + ,, a JJ QUu 09 cac. ° N ` - o • a) ra-6 -a a) o E c it-10 o U ° ca a) ° ° uf - U o .D U ` n\ _ ..cc c co - O cu � +-I to al aa — U a)s ;-.+ a c chi a'�-+ , `�� - CD a c o 8 Co_ o 4N �. I . f� O 4§ 3 Coate+ .a \ `•�1 2 a 3 3 c a c � � Q ) \ 1 , - c o = E at - a.., c C = > = MS —+., = T. C. = � boo a) a) T. a) o'CSO ) Q 3 3 LA a) a) L' L' o v, CLI Tu +r Co -0 CO N a) O InO vk CIA c • co o O > -ea > 00 ° coasC .0 > > G ca a)c 0 +-) U a) >- O f dJ a) C �; (I) -CBC qp O ;q"'� C C a1 N `n ) ,- =O O cU ) i � 0 • --I co (B tO ° O Z J c Q O O c Ci m cu '' -- '-'''' / c ° (t) 2 .c. 'Lao' .2 IT3 § O 0 0_w ,_ , c5 \ ,...t) .) /., 'L O O O p O a)LI a) z c� �j a) a) a) > > a) ° 1 /� k J ij i p 0 a a) av 0 , a� a) a) a�i a) C k �v ~ 60 v) N U) N V1 ra U L a o CO Co CO (0 �_ co 10 ° ;� 2) 2 2 di2 W— ) c 4- a rJ •a a) a) W a) W W a) a)'— CO 92 cu e� \ \ �, c� NI 0 r — \" �� v y ' . ... 73 —co • •I•4 "? ., 6 k r. ..--, c,‘ , k. U Cr . i E \ c _ � — -a a) c ai \ • U u c o ea Q I II V ? � � c N m O 'a' C c 13 Q Q. "Q O'a N 0 E c L cts T_'a s 0 0 ° u E -a c° QO +-, a) -a Zi C v co 0 D c _c c c to >` 'a — N \.,\) +0 co as "a w — u fl.+'Q.+ 'a Q? '� 0 a a' ° l CU I-) D CU ES 6 I ) ‘ \ ,..-.2,.. ,, 0 To ›- -?:- -3' 4)- 4?.. -0 ., .. ) ,.. \ v 3 `)\-*\ ate., - c = > u \ _ �V G) N 0 3 N CO to Q C 3 3 U a c � °' �o cts a) a +� a, 0 U) 73 Q� p > in CC Q 0-1 + Q �O U N ° •> Q Q ti r V >" Q) U cu c G) > fa ° E " �J C C a) C) a) N c ° to 1 v - L O —' o _° .� v a) c Ln - t o +- .. L 6 �; �7 'a ``' o o = o vcu a CI) c to , , 3 �� L t iv, tr.; c/j O to co -Li � I— ` ' h 11, +L tL O cca a no m cca c.° -a p Ni N *-GG a� a� of �' m �— L- co L >, fv ` ' �' a, a, N a) .c .c .c t t .c c _ E a,t co �--- — , 0 — — ` \ \ �-5- c ,( v s a) c -� = -IL !4 Imo^ cv 0 06 t ‘ d \\, .a ,� � �L : II ca CO .0 O >,a) +'' r, - -a! " ,4 v.,. .. ,.., a V V u c co o o n < -�� 1 cJ O 0 N J4.... (1) C as 0 ii, 4.0 W - -:- ' 4 .1...11 . .gi - 1 ---.--4 A '' m• N }' C = -a p fl. 0 -1 i O O :C ou o "'a; CU N O ° U O.- 0 +-, 4) "a c , '4- o .' ,J O c� O co O = c) 1 ,IP -' ' 0 ,. = F= :E faL N O j Q — CU -C C TO 4-' [2 ', CJ a -o :13 Uflfl Q O� Q. w ojkii .._'. A 4 cII =co = p is X CU a) N 4.., a +„ m o vs CC c'� 0 a� +, o LA C a) ca o o > C > o 0 co C ..0 > > r c ,p a� Q) V O La p a'ca L c 0. >► U U _N C N > p c- a Z3 p 0, v c (a co aQ 0 P ) > •F-+ `" .- Y O •0 L Ov VJ ci m } �'. e 3 ca 2 Q 0 2 c ° ° •- u of E } oo o o cjal a) aCJ, .,..)CO _ O fl; +�.. >O 00 t. \ J ,� {.� eil p : r �� J L O 0 . c, c, ),.IA c, aW CD a >= C c- .• I . O vi vi vi S 2 043 *E- ) -- (*(2 \ ' 4 A v i v! cn CO CO CO al cc CO ., co'O p •.,i I' N w T. I) a) C N- r ` CI) .c.0 .0 t t . _c tE tN �1 'Y *I l _ 0� \ — I I Q) $ a-+ a) co - CD L Q) L (` ) -0 0 A „ - 4 -a 0 0 z V N �1 0 W ca to C a) C .0 -afa) CO — j �� -6 10 d± CO 4-1 c �to +.+ "�++ � — 00 N nu U -a c..) c•+—S o co ate, C) C U +a CU E C t , 1;''. >- N. a) aJ U = ? c 'ra "0 .- U U ? N O O Q o o 5 z "- 3 3 +; CO -p o ‘. • ill ..,-- 0 TS II p s.. _ -1-' O C CO co O Q) CD O ° O C -CQ) V O > O co O _c. � O +.,0 U cn a) > c Q. O 4- o w s � y v cu uH N .I m 4 S ;I) ``� ` . I,- 0�oLL > O . � J IO / t N C/) l/Y O InCO (13 +a V ^ 0 0 t .0 L U L ._ t a) ? C I 0 °' E -D �� � 4- F- F- -c F- �-0 � 'r: C H O (-)i n o co aaaca m -0 82 ri :G a) a) a) m a) CV= a) C "- >. Z a) a) a) aj ai a)a) a) ea °) N rJ I a .c .° � t .c c 0 .cam (1).0 ,' �I _ _ - ` .�— 2 f. ,,---. , G., r I die r_ '' °'V °� I; 4 \i 0 �. &-- a 0 „..., <'- C1' ri _. 0 . . _ ..._. ... ..- "CT 0 0 O .p -o c c o • 1 ✓ V "aCn3 (13 Et Q fv : S O Q in 4_ N CDCD 'O Vo - ' N co a; -...._A 1 S.7"I"' -•,..t.,,‹ ....0‘,.. d) +.r C -O = O. -0 _0 in C �- m NO = = o = 0 E a `L) 5 _ N o o - v o•c ---, 4 •E.,, v -0 -o O 6 CD O o D ..'" 0 CU W = if -a-) >-.2 O. \ (` , )1 :), +' 4-, E " W C C) a, Ii! 1 hliiii cv 'E . sill 1 v X O = O cu E CJ ✓I �' ,� \, in_ O 3 t aso t; s as )" . Q c 3 3 W N LJ 0 N N 0 v 4, cc 73 •,11-K. f� di +a O In O> vs C C C ...�^ ,f C_ *' O Cc O O - ai ..r v f� O — ro O �.+ v r U to n3 as > O •� V' = o +, u 7 m c� n U c.) a> >- > O -}= £� CD "0 'm i C= ;n CD C 000 C:. ( - 1.... •— ,/, v) 'c a- ..-- 0 ..p 0 r p ( t V v c an _c o ++ :G I A fr..' to •c L C7 2 w O O O ,� G Q V 0+j CD ) i � ` AO ' t •L >- 0 0 0 C 0 Cl) ac z L t N Cn N U ZIA t0 4 O 2 4T , G4 it v o 4J N N f) O 4J a O N F- tom- H }'CT +' " �O �.� O V1 N trito CD N 0 G ' / lC tC COtC � CO t� , f0'O O a) t t .0 t L t. t aJ O` -mac ✓� J 2 4 .Y -0 4�, \9 ' ' in a) z" /7 41! t-2 , . 4,.. jtii, \ ... Q--) ' .... r_ 4' D .z. ,-;,.._. i , \ <j ____ 0 v cpa i5 ca a. 0- Q r \k‘ / , , `+- N co -0 +' p co 0 O a) a� C -0 g -0 0 VI (' m O = M 0 0 O C LLCU h C) Q._ Z1 L N v0 v0 "a U 0C , 4-, a) -0 0 C v to O p •G D c C C C >. T3 — chi P a) as cc —,......4 0 ci) CD = ..0 a) z.2, SZI. ,(Pt. ; nii>, a is tt0 '• �,-Cell.,.. ' I ` O >. 544- cn 4- E = �a II il....-41,! iik 'a) ,,,,, , .....„.....,.„, vis 1 , „ 'W. `= L' = ,(I) Z a) m (.0) a) N I W o 0 ok Ca 0 " co a t 3 tn 61 T. - CCCD a) +(1) p InO> N C 0 !/` G1 co 0 > ` C ca N V L 1- > O 0 , (- A. V — o o N ril ° .> per >- GJ a _� . c �a O Eeco O \" �� C-' i 7.+r C C 0 N C Cl- C O .p • -4- 8 V f'� r (^ o n 1 -. '-: ti'3 2 Ti (7 2 v . 0 U 0 t s 0 �/-/ c-, \� L., a II -C co CO CD E CO .15 -0 • 1.- 0 'r-' - ,). .,c- , I __V 3 t ,,,.. ti, ii,-; . tr) as p 0 a) a) W w a) el a) a) > C `� 4- -CF- F- H I— a-+s +-" 0 `O h WCCS MS CC cu 22 wCas"0 0a Cl a) a) a) a) a) a)a)ici a ca a) _� ' 0 - -` . �� 1 , -) 4/.. • ,L. i cS\ CU (: t 4-0 C -a _0 tea) R. - c� t aa) `�- ni p V N C cc, u ca Q Q CU v 1, CD a) � C -0 = •C. -0 o 4-1 cn m N ti C o ;� " a) dJ 0 O ° E -0 V c 4= .4-/ (1) .0 13 C u ccs 15 0 .) :'H *--4 0 cU CI) `P >-.F.), 0_ ' 4 ) 4-0 .4-4 r - a) c u 4-1 cu E--c 013 i 0 , O > 3 3 as C � ° Q ( G) = '- u . w — � _C a) a) 0 3 -oa 3 Q •� a' a) 3 "in a) o CO 0 ‘" C CN a) 0 In i2aC 0 LO, O > co • '� C ..0 ca C .G a)E V fII LO 9 O to -a +�+.� f r `U k ��O �O c) 1 a) O .> c a_ C • �� L •� N N .c a IO J 1� o ,t,,, Q � ON O t (46- om) —' ,Y, N c I m a),- ✓1 �� co 2 ¢ 2 Ts' o U 7--- t •L >- o 0 0 0 o CI) Cl.) CO z -� > Q J � � o ,a) E t L N N N U N N ', v - 1 C ti� O O v a) a) a) a) t a) >.-a C 4- 4-- .0 .0 t _C �� ,F, E O •. <( _�. C +� N F- H F- C ,a) ai 0 CI- O vi cn vi vi in �n :G a) a a) a a or:: cu as co c 4- 0 �� 3"0 I-a - ten=�---� �-� 4 ki ,) —11 ---- a - t \c I ___ a.) v. \. 11.L Li., LL_. ° = o oas Li' (1- 1CO C 9—0 CU 0CU ` v CO o ft U ` �C/ 7 -o C +, O a 4_ -D : O. -0 O N p = o o ;= ° E c �v N O v .a E -0 U pc 4-0 N 'O O W `+� 0 T) % . \\1 N a) , kk >. ti CU 0 >. a) 2- c -2- 0--c-,` o - 1111 r"-- -%.iti , 144 p _ = a, CD s_ U a, yam„ tv „ X.),) . f C a� v a� 0 3 -a = ro _Q � a' W of rn U °1 ca ° .� C) N a v o ra `^ -a TO _ a) +r O N V) a) C O O > 04 > O - ry > > C 12 r �� V O O coo co +�- . v o a >. avi > 0 E �' � a) a' a�i c c ° b -, ►\ U •p +�,- ` DO z O _ ED ODo �.1 c Q Yoo 5 -el o v co a) JJ - 12 �. , 0 V, '— Z '-' ."73- c- •k we \ , •,.. t' I\! O O CD a) a) a) N O of C - 1- co N ai 0 a.... vi ,A- n In vi `a a `amcoL o f4ai CD ai — L- s- I- L L 1-raj L a) . , -ia � a) = .0 .0 t .0 �� • .0 N, J J f f 1 I iz fl1jo -a = co 0 o. fl. N \ .l P O W ca ca -a a�i .c O 0 "a y cu c .M a.., �..�... +�+ C - _O N m N = = O lij;c 0 E c u_ a) i O sN o 73 U o c _c _ C co a p +a ( cC o = U N ) { _ -0 -0 N O >. L N C 4-• c �++ N c.7 `S y :a v v w A O —0 O ` ♦ , L. O 4- Q- 4..a • E = '\.: , c >-..c 4: N Cu0 M a) ( s_ u a) \J C EL.) , L C) O ,C \ j �/ t 1 a) O -O 3 co Q c 3 3 in U) m m °) 0 �� CO CD N 0 ' O N C C� ` cii46 O > "CO - p0 0 ra C .0 O m m 'G co a)4 `L 11_ = p U m .2 •5 ,, p� _. N 'O N a1 c v) M C MO O r f i �J li Q a O J N fII •� •? O v c� d > A-- < Y O 5 N 0 alai ,, mac\ J Z3 9- 4- 4- 4- V U Q1*' L, oC co c 0_ 0 cu cu w E cu > > cp-5 Z fl,,,,,..,_ t_-_, ' t) \lif\ \ Lz —LI- -C ra (4"5 t'aj E 1.34-' .0° -0 • i.- 0 7:3 \...\.. i-, ----;_._ ';'•-: .‘ ,-‘›/ \'4 r ------ L. t cj N N 1LR C J ti i i .� \ i C vi vi vi F-• vi in C en O CL 0 ca co ca u) ca ca ra fa'a 0 A ,G a) a) a) m a1 a)_ a) C 4- �. IV _c _cc _c .c W. .c E a)" --`\ N �--.5._'_ _______r-- �) N N H otU.\ +-0 a f _ `...2 ts— zo-_, v) .4---,,,..., ',-) LI. / 0 06 ›,.4 i i - / _ci, >,.. i• paC W r J i O � �- d `.:J J\ cio, c co 0 aV) J -J w to is -a a' ca O ` `.-5). --„..., a! CO N C C = � O C c �'O p O o0 O `� u O co a' N O C._ "a V +e-+ 4J - 'O C v C 0 :G L c C co >- a-•+ to fa - N = V a)L •O4- 'O a) ;0) 4 Ec m a) O'O .0 \\.\ 0a) >.▪ Q, .4-+ 4_, a) C U a f 7• L ?e,le \\\\ to 773 .� u u ? N ? C p o— 0 •\ cO 5 4' § H tQ C e O < ' •k, 1 0 \' G a) 4- 3 d — a ._ V _i, to c b a) W \_ ) ! J N •— L' El.) ' °' O 3 V 4n ca --- C-i(-1- \ Q C 3 in a') a s— El! -o `' LA N a >>te•+ N ate, 4-, O h tn C c C c j y l �� ) O > ru O 0 to / - • U - ( O > O to O t- J l O ++ U cn a) 52 a fl. N C - ca OO 'KJ /, .., j y , Ci., in �� Cf-4:, tf EJ ai '+' (o ----' --- ref-i ri- < o p 0 aim r � ; J- U `1 // �- O O C O a C \J� �0 a, v Cl) E a) > > CI) z I. `, E o --+ L t N to t) O , is t6-� ~4-, �, `i 1 ..J� `,,,U . Q Q y a) a) a) a) a) a C (, j > �( �L, r �- 4- H Fes- s N +'='a ' ' O 'i • y — v , vi vi vi vi Vf vi s co 73 o ��— ---c( :GG a) a) a) a) a) a)CO CO Ca 2 co ca= a) C 4- >' \ N 1 I ' ( 1 L L w L L L Q) L to a) w \ 1 J o ` a) -A \, \ +� CV CO = CO _i__ NN \ \\ NJ } c LL c C a °' ai = `J ' • 1 . 1:3 C c 4.4 0 so 0_ 0-_____, ‘ c cs' ,...< ,), 6 , , -, 0 0 16 Ti C CO = CU r„R 0 ...ra.. \ , i s•-•1 k c tv 0 0. CL .:4 1",f) 7.:..j \., ,4, 4- D ffa 44 ! U ! C aU CO a; ,` J iti O W v +°.3 C •fa F, 03 (N 4E, c = C fl. OV) sj Nf !"j -C C C fa >• O O v i , , d ) iv, - li ik i .--, a . .(1) F m 7zu >-4.9, 0_----z, U O • p > 3 3 3 ,.,.,, fa -0 O ) 4/2 aJ I E C = > 3E 0 x 1 1 CDi c J, , �-, N a, G, O '�- Q ttO 3 3 v) a a CU 20 A. ViSj c+., O = Q- 4— C C M in a C C C 4O° i N. ,i _ Ca- O -n is (0 `�- "' -p >0 r- ‘„^ ' !\, am `� Q 7X200 0N ern— } Q v — cno as L aE S vo u a % \ C ' J >- - a o c c N xi i ZIAo L CoC .0 2a)J' JvN p 0 a a, a u a, a C 0 vi vi vi ~ vi „A C cO N — -J fa fa fa as cis fa fa C-0 LO c a) a, f1, fD N N= U 4- >, r •\ y • Cl. - a, t N CD A 114 5 q Ni f 24 0 -1 Li 4 tt _ \y A-------J1 _ o -� C7U >. `" y 4- �L a) a - 0. p -0 Pp 'U C o M a C QN O L''N . a) cv},0 FL o N Ca N E' C Z O 2 t.13 \ O O0 a= 0 o CO a .CO o v E 'a V O:E a-, Q3 -a "O C Cl) C 4- Oc C �J `s C c co >, O _p 4- .o -a a 'LE CU Q.+., -C . NI 1 C. 0 . a) _>.O 0..,.. r z) 4- L Q) c V 4-IP a\ '� Y ) vi ' = vi 4- CI +.1 \ ''' 3 ()\\' - 4_, -E c = > ts =4-, `c\., A '1%4 4\1 3\ a, to 0 Cli +r O O C O +D 2 +'' O is ca O C V L 0 j O _ca 0 .W 4 L 4' /1 s� o 0 A v O •5 O N C C Cl.) a) v' a c o 0 • CC0 -z ,n -' i N a O p Co ca y-- '� G > o �--� QY 2 O -5 ++ am 5 r %� U 0_c E ‘...... _k, v.. „A., ,,,.,,, \..1, .\.., ' .,t:. _I , O .CI a) �a-) Q+ E +w+ > p aJ.O U y -� 4r L_ N US N O tn to fo c) L 0 C V O O t L -_ W t t C > sP J rl 1,n V )to IA' v of V 3 co 0 C t N N L _ ._ (C O' L) al N N= LC 4- �. C`I C6, , 4G a) a) a) caaa) _ ?L a J J •_.l Y fB a U v -o 6 c o c z a Q v) U tv '� \ 1._......,-) 1 . r 0 �.) '� -- 4- N C ca t� - �•, U O ru 2 C °1 to+a € C t CO— .C3 CO a' C M 10 ° 0_'24 O v'N 0 = o O O OC ��N 00cp 0 ;0 .0U C._ _ ''J -C.e-+ 'D C U C 4.- OC .G D r'� c ..0 C C as A O � - ) i ..." 0 aJ a) = .. :70 ."' -05 0 -V.) ../4A. -III :....--"'j c'' ' . , O ' LaiN �++ A Ns ,' , II i... °a ''..) tic - 1 i---,----\!\A >;),,_", '+- N q 5 \N \= ! c cn to C C o - ? '• r--. `i G a) 3 f° ca da) 1 )cis:\ / 5 ... } N O a) To0.) 0 1- LI y.. k, � i Q 0.0 3 3 in a, s- =o .1 a) CD o ° > ' C 0 ea C > > C O II _ U NO To o ....... %� �' cil - rk---- ' ....),, .--- Q _ Ncii O v uuf N aJ o0 .a . -� r 3 u O.0 O _ ') Q 0 t t t w .0 t "tst O 4! >- �+ }+ f- I— -C f-' �'a i-+ E O •z- �� 0 f0 co f6 2 co co- aro G r r S CU t t s .0 .0 t E a,.c 67,:r v c0 . fir, c�. fe r rc) ra rJ sk. of r-.I .. I I I •ice•+ f C co a >. `, %) v\ I L` L'I ( 0 a-D 0 O Z l G II i _ a 03 Ni O o 0 0 ;� 0 0 M " °�' cs -a u •- ate-+ N 13 z3 C U co w- o .G D C -C c c ft >. -a 0 a) +, ca ca -a a = cs a' p 4- -0 -a a' m a) Q-4.' t -a of v- 0 La 00 > = 3 3 a, as � � 1 k.1----- '-)."' a) = cv ••,;. \ ,1 -1.:._•‘ v, ,C L_ a,112 a 0 3 -a N ca -4 ---r- 'J2 , 147-4...._. Q c 3 3 v) 0) a �' v ,o �„ +.1 a, +.r CO -0 a) +a., 0 In °j C O C -C °> > iv -c 0 +' L. t6 ��-+ ra a) c N t� m LD 0 > O m 0 ate-+•— p O 4.4 u �- `•s 0 "5 c 0. ca OJ ZS a a c c 0 to O C C a cu 'n a c 0 c U i m4-1 _ 4 Q o O - m 0 = Qm a) S Q k A ....L, t . - c� 2 ¢ 0 2 3 c 0 a°,c E �- In S L y A O 0 0 c 0 U a) a c C6 �' `..k v �- ri: to +tta..+ ti.+� E ra _g 2 -c•° c ` c r L" to a aj Li U a� -0 a a-+ i2 C� s -A .j '" O 0 a .c .c c c E CU >-0 • p t --�\'_' C I . 1- I- I- vi via a� a '0 ,0 fC M to al t co-0L 11 q c ,/,�-+ it. 112 GJ N C1 i.) LJ= cJ c 4- ? H .c t t s c t t I- -Q 4- H N � -' n -,C Q aA oo 0° a °o �' — O � '. —. • a) 4-0a1 ra _ to - LL •L w - N �� 4.0 a 1 c o 06 9 _ \ �- 1 C �U t _ 1 C 'Q so ',c cu = -c ___,..) ,.., ,, „9,. C3 C cn V CU CD CD O . c � = a ' OV) v CD 0 0 0 o o C `ma) 4 , a) " -a c °' c 4- c O c \ )..., , _C -C c c (13 a - __° C : a, . RS ca 1:3 U a)t `\, i �Q 4- 'v .0 a) 2 = m tv 0� j 0 aJ r . _ , 4„, C u 'c.+ CU Eo C "tto 'C ; 4I� >. cu co 0 -0 t.) >. Q �' T 3 d Zf Q- O '` O 5 4- 3 3 a' MS � � to c c O < .-�' ""-, a) 3 3 co .c co J szut • .N c C = > 3 E - 4- • 4" , \_,\\, , , Q.) = a L 0 = v -C _a N a) 0 3 3 Q •� 3 3 C N _� w �' �o Q) a; 0 O > 'co - o C � � C _ C > to E a-' Z CD 8 2 0 , -, '6' 2, 5 c 0. _e_- 2 '-' L. Q) -0 a) N c u to C O �- � C •C a) a O o cV .._., s O ( o�ca o o o 2 i 4 `� 3 — (� 2 Q w 2 3 0 u° o= E o , •' itii s `� �r '� >' o 0 0 C o v a� a°J. c co C c� .0- Q -Q a) w w E o o to Zc `� v IJ_ ate, ate, ,3 2 - • H O4:).. .. c- - ` �„ (4 N N 0 Co:I1 ++ Q) V l < O O a) a) CI) aJ a) a) aJ �L-.yC ... a)4- �., E- F- lam- t- 4-1-0 ' p i cvi.,,, -. o a C'b4 * o 0 iRa, a) a) °' g C C CD 17- ›, oCI) '1 c A r a' co a' a Q) s t .c s .c t c .c s- a)s M —� --- -�_ r6 NJ CL `_ 1. �_` No Modem, No Internet Connection,No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the Internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name utog ap Count 14 -T24 (<47 � C3 0 I I r 4 1 i,2;1 L'''' qi tiZ LbV J,IN� 05I - Gilt\, l--= 2z- P0.k2K. ; IN- MO p N Ii a:a. .,Om- C ys/,V, 1131.1.i' ' oh atir-7,117 P1Ar 1 Je( , • , 4 A AMERINIA! , Mr...---... (11111110-- :::- 411 ...Pr-,e___, . Of 2_ - 1 -A ( II) kfr-0-..-„ .....-- warAIIP110-"4" N 0 . - dig„_ c , . - (�Ge� f , Y r � �r � �/ eee qkz PG(fl[2v i. i,toilei/ l '• ', eV - riuN Kuvble.— ice" of i e/ '/i -)-�- --44-mes 5 ,41 tistvo x-Til c ,-.g.�` c.a.,, r <c //i ce i. (A cqYda I/ 1601-61)(1 , 0 a.6__ • 11/r Z 141 /LIi ./` J r (:)14P to 1- i,„ B iq'n c z N4p)i, - 22' V u'W z3 eCifi--e---- ? old— ,z No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County 4/q dr I`` al lt3Cn.Ke l lc�.. e�(ini'P /LaCL) I ti i7L _ C©I l l eor 19 L.l 7 c} J to fAi\ ,u1 6io L to ce- QaLiti 4 fel ga.ede AdirbAlc5c-c zjLit-(__Cael, i____e<_, . Lt . ' —ZLtL /Wi451 / ' Z 0 l•iA " .5Ihra.....01111.I_ Le _ qinillIENIMIIIIIIIrr2" Ler€ -0 ( . tee. < _I _ L�` , V - --:- c ( ' s Z . ' , -i l - Al.. t 4INIMENRIE ��a A 1 I CtA..xA-t- 1 �� __• i1..�_ o L . .. ► �i r� , .i::.� 1./Li,. _' (r r,CSc t-! /u e ;-,)- .Srti H.© /2-4t , 5,,.., k '- G. tz, y . io . 7. z Ryv,1 1-4‘iN l.` C1/3 ' ),)- -. t Y) o f . 9 , / Lee • No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally,petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4-Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County 9- / O 'c)l otJ .'II.'4tyt /IA1c 9. /4sJ(7i2 Q F -, o-ate �c. \\ „,� L am\ Li /c - 27- C. t1-s- ( L_R__.-e -I. -i6-zz S.SU�,,�- ed i 1)-< �- z q- /U'-3 C ' MOk k(k-c c.e,t cnl I i e v- 0. -JO ` z Z /-{v•7 /'& /1 .et.(1' c> 0117(0, Zz .;e. C .P cots e-it `f- / / _ a--`— r, I /C /<'r Re/g I /V7 / -/I ---2 iZ A m67_l� A.1 in r27c" .AQ AZ., L/ -1/ , a cZ NJi,4,LL'-e Le- -A-t j -�--c,� ''L '/i -ae2 ,61e- c,, e- • 1 � Leek Co�4 FL -/l- ott d (' 4sa 7` � No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County L// /,i fri ltt i,ti 0 A rvf0n' It - � ee 'LZ C(%�oc M M . 1)Q—I a i �Wi, L1tL,< ?_L� r< il el /1--z- 64-LX/I-P.A V k--,v r,(1---- ..4 iridAZ,,17272,"."-- y f- q -=03- ( fC--b,e& /ee7-76c1"d-- 4-9 _ VIA%di Fnt `Y L K c(-�a a _ 71- 4JIf r 4. r-e' ii -ct -a N' ` - 4-t '' L,- �-� zz. �,���� -� CO (ice e- �-D- 6-Q_AitAmL srea. ----....i own s____ E-0-1(.12-r- hi a 2 f' i-gy 5 ea 0,ve.,L kyNti I 1. 1- 4�id/2Z 0(421✓P c_k,,,,,k_ \ &..4 Co( 11�� )'' rAci \-____,,,„‘..w. 41- - ___Czek,ya 14A Vc 2 Z a�, Y-, k '�%Ri+iri : _ r -1 - t /f' / ( lam L L/'J/- cc c1 L* n /,o c j -// :.S ._`-,4,,t/,4 4-4 c'r'_/� r0n1 ��,,,�.L j" w rris /7 74(E5' i ifc)s�.r /7 �1 � �� No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Auto:ra•h Coun 7 i/ zZ tt/A yr .e '2*wr'e' ff Ali fgf, —_J r, // e _- g 2--1— • Y 1,v b a 14.-e IBM lif f 2-1- ---a ► _ . .. 1, !�t4 Py.0 : ./ P '4-11 - a' r'- awi R o (,er �l7, _ . 1. ' I ' I' coto fir: i, o 0 AglirOlfrAIM. .<,,(2- i - - ' L r - / I - Z Ed+ 1c f e-5 Lit-e— q L el _ L i i . S l/t, t % i /, Lee ' - � . `c.( . - co AIAM : ‘ 1e - IA— , -TL ih.e. , IIN,�, rp, l,, - 2-z irn9Ak.7-74 S%ai' _ '..e , 4 No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name utograph County 1I1(piaa- lnnat ?/(ti,-- A.4,71.4. ° ' L 1,2-- L (1-0 A�(! v \\\0\\,ti () c_t az,6(\ of•e _ A., LI l IZZ W1ll, 4h C. t1ckaA, (_t_e (/I k(z z _I-c)y c j -ctLL, e�i.. 4 a,w,—J Lee �fl1/6 � �J///xP/ /� 22 ,�l/, r 7/ l J /I ir3fat S .4 CCU IA !Y r Ill r �..�_ D.Q1.0A a VA iik of tea. Wall --/ J- - J ii./7C / r g4-, iy 1 g -.A.2_ ___ .i.Z7,_ki- ..) rew cfL_ \. 1-.) QuipAAL (L6jui:2_,Ld- g--f ft rt( .4 I ) rWQ/m.e.--- Arirte ok,01., rfi1r'c/ ti 1 8(2-z____ w ,1.s , V -„Jk)JI L-, L Qv1 2 7rv— Lip.ceps No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally,petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4-Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. WI Date Printed Name Auto raph County _ Iliq Ot Yr-A. 1 L C4--- •/ , ' 9 )2z 61 n113, 2Ev ,L&b TctLv C.I(;e✓ /y/7 ��, �/ �.iag' YZA..efitof,,12., Lee 1 i/1.4 Mai-)I x e„11 7 C O SC- /-1'—�Z- ' k cS ,Si +i � /�4-�-x. y eye: z a- .ICl-� i.c55tcx Molten DI 1 Mahon' A( ,Ohio 11: A t' A,1 evAttAi‘-, Ne-tit-- 0_ .--jtat eftu4, ' '-/cA . L 1-2-s z 2 \ �iN- ` \ v� ' < <% N-\/\ 'Z 3v1'C c o C r Li 1Zs12z- )Y (e1k1s c6/ie.-.; 1( 9/C .-- ------rryt ce- d jt-1) e,/ eV_ ot '.. . 0'tA,c__ 7-((1-4 j1 5A Me-s 23 ikl Le,\ , ': ` Goo L i, f yeti? ti gQf4i. 1-1,,N ► : <4 . 4 c,..)i/,Q� mil- a`"j-�`-a, f11...s-›_D' l . l'e)i, -IG el- L-I— 2-1— itlJc C Avv pttr7o. L_Er Q, G No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Namej Aut.• .ph County Lif'zl �7 ��‘ lei rsee- — ---e ?FilLi Ok 0/ 0/)6-4-i-Ind.c l'•4 le _._ Le- 6 a't irld- .bo,r (.kAk - tf-"o0- ,e_e__ t((\f),f ( 1,7_ Qt>„,& k._NA,kk ‘1 giw401 isizs2_, t RoN cM� Alliff4 col 1,,�► r/2 2 al-n- �v , 4w, M i -€ --�_ 4 /2A / LZ i's., 411,3 R 1<_,.� ,�i-e1.-I/,__ _� ,. �Lfi L 4!, o 'iiay%oz &ems ��� ,A 4.,E U -I 2--1 Z---. it( AcTitite,MPS'-64 iti ' 7- (li j, 4 ? L( --?- kpi_4(ezvu., 6--e .5 Co-elt}L—. L. Ili_ GO Y i41671-02 44Az kt-te -akit , P(tbA4_ as-A , &ccit sur 7/z//ez_ -Jeti-1 :, ,.. (.0,...c.._ ciat-,A. �/,0` o) - i;� "I Z 5/L Z jiMO lI - ru // ,/ ; aS/ddt'Q I, ,...din A ' 1► ,/, _1/4.4 >/ No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County t ()t-- cc\ I Le, y/o'i/i.2 c P�c,1 cloy/ . (5/L2 0 CP ,i CoLk_iscv.. zll2, Z a- kit, -w sLA-ne _ r- LIE iill_ql_2_ 6ii‘,4---Ai f-I-0 Kr A161 cztu,--4-.4_,,-, 'ig-Q /.-,9s:. �- 1A-1 1l -eJ r t- �/1J7ei Ye -4ivilf- _ coile � Ms- / /Q-60�Ct� dII1� Gr 4-61 412S rZ2 re,i @ C-ol,«r- i-/'2Z �faf7 ,,;)7 :Ck.`..1 Cad/1X)( Cl'i?"S-4? - 0 a-6/+- Pc` ,A;611)6 fl Lam. 1--ki ._ mros x c — - L 7-gigt �Y NO NIA jkalkik. At kku,M f.../(--e/ 7f.d� ,5 /mi / / . /4- i 'c�2 -, .tea In ai ,\ • ,M '<1;U,/lk, 5(, chkoL C Y-1.&Po' (7,1>ia Livii: 61/i ' Ve-i--/#114- . Co i i i sit_ /1 '/? t Hew 4. 41x,,, c'o/h2, No Modem, No Internet Connection,No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally,petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4-Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County V/7/007 ,7::::;„ A Le Ki a tr- 0-0-64/1 Xi.116, (.' 4 e____ , r 1�12:7 , ►�w, CS-e c2e-ezlise e1 ( __.Enc (NE ob.D4c Ve& ms2 Lc l F it_ W 7` 2 14 itilace I-tivideocge- t exr u62- 46=7/2_2- 17621&-r-r.6- 1:11,,t5-6*-1 . / ' (4. -- , 44(2.1 in, ,Ter4- 4cv-ktAii- (14,&'it t-f/_s ,- _c)/ t_cs,S(,-P-ti(dj-t6,' cli ' 1, '-,,,--c-, ,u_„ ,- , -Le 9 , , 6 .,a, zo,---z,-/- cbii;ce„- 1l - - - A L 1 I -s!', C� .\.- 4.1 Iffli:‘i CAtti- COlti Cr � , .4vc�Lot) iz-L ve- P084: Cs"'"- _Adirat ZeQ---- 6" f ( 2 L (--,p .ow w�Jt, . . r, "C- c-1 .27- 2- 2 I r\E l l ill (;,) I k K ' 61 1---.2__� q/27 J 2 z ill 1441 )C A cli t No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the Internet,do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people,lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County 11/ -11;:i -ra v-‘, a Q\AY 1 SA3k c , ez,,--,-444,,g, e 0 /__ ,....., �1 27/AZ a4i6 fill-P4er-T �n ed 4.../e� y /2-7/Z Z D ct v\ Co( l� j`S �� ( I' (o/ ( ake c— _ 'g'R ?-47,1— fcj lL is;�� . gfel u i a1 0 , a--L_ ! S - .�...!< __c-c_._ q / -) /LZ Rope.. c Jcfa % --� y/1/1 /2 z a,- ,, Mac 6 or d' G{ //Asf/a� kvAC. (AA''1'Sf� 1 ( (/e!'- ii 6,5/22_/) ) ' i_i '' ft 44\ i .L ) ?- Er, 5 . ) . i Pt. 1 dc)- 1 /Ma) f' s * ( ,ue--.4., . .0 f c1601llyev Aire L-iiptida IL-COnf--Y Gutfi f Cb1( ;\et / r A1 . .2-: 1 t�t i -I L�(-Il,`t�r'6L � C L - 0 1 (c,Q4'_ 1 a i k . . u t I/-_ a . .,cat i S- L-2Z Kr\-Tbi ti,..: -E• 13- 'd • ! -`d-e-� C//� - ;. :.._:_. i Cal j `Z'2 OX.Vc r) ,J. 4 1tc) - Z 2 Z \, c -J l 41IMMtL .rr S_ ad - )r t i'v -s IPinity - 1-e-e-- No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wireless(y transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Aut;:ra. i Count affillignIZMIEFut om , ?--....• ee' --2 — AirMAIIIIIIIEci / zj -2 .14a,1-1/ G/9 -.y ,/- - - . ... \ ' , liiiHreifittilEMW - i t_ 2"Z U.0 i ` oup A-- - � a i► 0- - A-vt i'tk 1 _ M t,r1w V-'C, Ss �� C\s1�• C 0S . 4ictf LS1k-0/Y — ,, e✓ ,Amimmoinieirefir__ - 111111IMM111.111 (41 „t, r fL grvalga/MOVA-7,, ME_ Ac _...-_, e4--- .? ,Z 21 G I I ct n Cam. _m.. 3(Z 6 L-� 1z-(� (IT 141,teis 6�I1 ler No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro, and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4-Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date inted Na a Autogr ph County *it, 2-' ihitibli ) / "._____________tjd ,_ : (�—�gb ��( - f Le m de-e-ie2(:) ,4 , . ��� , ,,,f), 00,,,...,,,i , P/ „„,„ L� 4S(T .b a Le__ CVef 0 (L% 3/26/ 2.2 f , ,J (?E, r` S2 t )? R 1 • 1n '' t i Tz 14. A MAN 11 r -,ram i�/ n = , JL •4 Qi. �. �`A!J/l;10. C i i/ h1_ 0r kili � , ��'.���_�`'/ 11110 2 L_ �, r JI, Mfg 111 111111/11gMix s 2....4 UZ- 7 / I I / -/1- / v`f C)4/6)-D- .l�, i 'U/items. 3 2 l ZJ eQ .a c. J`/eAhem z 71j/) _ in,, .- 41j a kt2 ✓✓ ► r d rt.0ri o-{ fit. /---e- `►. a - _, : %� �ig i , t No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the Internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date P "nted Name Autograph County �..31„3I /�'d— `'al tuiy-N L CAiiis Q.r bee 47 3, h - .��s - �)ci.�� r 3 -- 1 - a _ 'M6„ • L,c— 'IA4,, -, ' ,,,e, Lo..-{„. 4,_ :„, .2._ \__,-, _, ( (,_ (,),1/4-,yu ,c 3 2 2_ p.)/).-eNi..-12 -CM , 31. ZZ SC ki ' L 3/3) zz J cc, me,/ 14i h� rcl eC, Z_EL // ,? , .,W,:,,Q*..; Y /0.4,:-/ 1,,tic,- - . ._ 3 2 ,vq),� et-t/ t 3 i /..)_-2_-. c LQ �l "(5,1 2.1_ \ vi........._ YL.,,,,v) L A-4- 31ja--`)/ Lv� 1 w\ ~ .-✓ 3 3 \ -i 3 n-\ P) [� ii1 3 \Z ��\c-� � � 't__.__ h--�-.-- 2. aF It 12X �, 3 ( L LZ - _____ Li I 1 2 I �- Rivq Co I, i No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor, we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. ,:te Print-d Narr�e Autograph Count a � � Wi a 11111EINIPJ1 Alialliair-- -PINIFFZio; / 4111r°,_ i AirragriglaaWi 4.-Ii AMI fit r az 4, a. 1��1 eN,.,,N., . r1. Lee / : n/t.,/ - t'Z,0 13 totlObi --%1''1( A i A-P e, i - ( -LZ rhave-t .e,-�. 0-O (of 4 - 1-�2 ►�� u�il c c � y�v�� miCi 1 aAcLP 4 —(�-7—z iil 4! (v� -- In Um ( 0-,,1 Vi/ i MO- gal, . , ,e,y)) /<, yip 3, 0-4, i_ ki_ , La c 4 *0-2,1-et Le-/ 0._Ar...i.. .) ik-)&-pj:21,c) IA ./.7 riwa",`..- CO 0 ,<JVA— .„.. It I ).1-- _FI:,,ii`o [3t, „21..r �a I/;eT , /717 /IV Co-OriAt . le& Ifl, 0 ,e Se__,77L/- , P L ¢C-es 'ti , 1Zz- .-► " ti" C. L�� . (.([,(ii, r\pobruzvp cy // /)2 No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor, we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printe 'Name Au ph /f, County / ii UG ' L 3� .i r/ 0 /f✓ .. c,�'t ----q/tcrya, vlitc,,u ,,N 1--:1,_+-e_ Y).,,,,,,0 . c_Q--.±-5D_ 42,_, (� Da & i-Pe.. / r✓r l l _ _i # ..j.� r 6r • , iiii If( cj [)Z rink._.( ( c&.tf ., 'Ri,4ce, A &(ti v,,t CA 1 10..t 3/i Gt J a a_ 1' ctsr,z_n Sri rk 1-0) e.k. C;Qa IP Co ZCc.e r- AgfLornY---- ,312?-- all Piz C( c 23 1. a P ef:AP a a, eoutA.l 2. Z2 `L V, 1 vi t3/2 /7 Wq�l ce 4 I../, � iir` f t 3 -2 3 --7_2- //4-;21lu g6CLsO1) . ��� .,. _ i 3—�3 2-Z f `f�rkci— r�,v,`.e_ ���t co,--- L-G-e_. 3 .23 .2Z7 Giram_ *id ou Ed :" -----0 _ L / ot .afrimigtk, ,.,.J. „/J No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor, we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County ;)"a 3-).) CAP()ULF: LA0Q8 COeCtiTi) , , FA112i-H L;) cr 3• L-3. 2.2- �; -v..c-, c-Lk t}, _ �1\ 7---)--�__ 1��,, .�t:- -.d t -,..,1,3 J,.,t- . BRIK Cr- - ` f f " ` — aflu LIAKI , -‘ , 0sL' -' 2q-z2 Co\1 ( 141).e) 1 C' Li , .�L VI y/)_) 14-A/4). C c.,/-1)-0.t. ;11, A‘. . A.,:%,, ,4,,,:i..-41,....,` . 4-t-L-- -/ 9 qi" 7-2_//lylLe,i_I PA/ ' A( / (0 (fr-'7 ,,P Y-022— 7)6'A ./VI— A 0,er ' ' frv_%-zi /- E-- 19,-//2.2 _A),64 nel n 0x� ,-,Cr...? y)i,, ,LE-- y 122 p i s k o3 S C to+AY i -3/ u( I do- e� Sa n ( ( it( /dZ ?ZZ , A) We7AR,-- /-4-- --- 7 3 Li 12 2-. u lei s{c,' cl I I e tLG(,[,( �v l t l e 3 (24 -22 P . co( ;e..r- 3r ii VIA 6frnX E'55 .• , . . . N�� e«it : ' , b.. 6 S 64. -- 1 a,.;c A 4/if/Jr_ 4111/MW , //)c r_ No / ° e-PT\, No (n{e..xrte4- c onnec 4- .1,.; Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems; and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor, we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro, and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4-Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date k&adgd- Printed Name Autogra County /0- zo2Z \(6,t.-)1-64170S j �C ( dZZ%/ae Ho - -- Cu &e Gco), ,-�/-i �� (oilier^ 2-to - ZOLZ iC,t vi t riQ rstni4-I " Claux z/ I t i z Q i c t4-ii-+Zc (t.6�Xi) _: -Q Co lI i '0,, 02/,0/01 1- 7O oa-t�rya s� (6eia 9 1101 Z Z 4c;Ctivi.L.,-‘: l _ r_ l�.v11f..o ra to .� O1i✓- 1 l a � 61)/1lev- z1j,. 1 zz 4,.-+kci�►1 1�G,�''s (offe y 2()&(2_ _ t,k9A\text ks. J A/4 f _r.i, __) f,u c, ( (f @,1"- 2-))0 )27-- I./ tP EL.;e 6 i ( lips LA. 2 LI/o/�1 -� �ornr-11 Q ac n.os , /i , Ai! 1,941411— — (.ol �j 'ev 2� p I \17 S 1 Ca( ; t-e- a 1/D r�`a 3—eia4 h A n,e i1. edit/ei tt. 11 0/02‘0 2II 0IZz - s11 7 1s Col 11 r _)) / O / C.�cl//r C T' I'/ (2vt ./// 4[.4 Ad�7e v /� / ,,,,c ,.. „ , r / e��. C/� L li p Ltd i�, f, 6 G011/(�) ,r�L, 1.r., a-a�i �a Il f,f_ 1J ° /VAo�ewA, /o I .. efite_4- ( erieor- ;feeN Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems; and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor, we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro, and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name o:ra.h Count , - a& -Pk I is rQFl,Ctc T/ ! ' a MEMIIIIIMMLIENMPJIWAIPYE_. C_o (... (-- 1 e - THIEWAltr. -( �3/// (-� z� T 21/6/ 2L ✓. ih Teo ZT,C Ai' aLZ...f tie r f } 1° ffi ")-2 uw2 7 C 1,pr uJ 1/4)---r FF8 i6� 2 0 2 2- '1Prti£.T ��,4LKti;Z1 c��Li �l �c:� (el& C. _ic ie._ .7,/ /o L �/ 1 3 s 1!,' i ,_,,,i- \,/i-- Z...2, cc.-4., ,, ,,,--_1. i&la a_ 4 s,1 ng 7e)/2,#7(c-.P--- ‘4` ir-7 , al/U er '�C6r� 7 !If----------- 6;9 A 6. r o? /0 � �/ w / K/S 02--//0/3-a- ta ;-irt 641.1.p. e'12 6 0/ - /� // 024 I bi•L>-- -,--iiiii -,-Ivid4c- 0 ;:. CI-awe- �t,v s a�' `-� � cc,i EiZ 7 -it) — .1Z iin tj`'-\- ( '��. ...,,/ i / t ...t /! -,U Cam' It J `-r1' ., ..� ,.r No I " ,,,) EYE 1 Al v ...L4'` c 2T C__csA+l\ecA- c v) Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems; and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem, and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor, we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro, and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4-Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County G'/"/Li 1 1Alb A M. 11641 ir-u /77 r..r, 6--- (Y u 21 I I )1,_ ►+,.; Nv1 1 ,4_,-_r- C O(t_/ i: rii- 2-''/ ii ? /1/4.1 (X li il L.--, -i-4,A,v i Th.---- (07// -L------N 2 ////2 -2- ee,-,I. 1/.) ce,__\,---, cvt,1,i (LS-N7--- 1 c:—Th ,, i ., ,.)/ id /2 •I" 6eir>etil c-iirc,,,t, 7 -91-- — 1 ti -7--) /i /z ,7r 11V C/ll ,,DI)/"( �->'� �// 2/2 2, \,/ ix 0 La Cc 4r�n `1/� Le``4',-'t Co l ii e-r t- /I' /C9 (; J'''c IC '—' /11(06 -(1 C ? (.; 1060't ,6V___. 41 �~r`l 12/ 2 8 i-ci,,,ciUf\ ,t Lks ..G' -/%' L .. _e �� ) \-)--)-- J���t Q. -,L16�A (- �,Q,i,l,�a-t,y-- L - 1. / () /2,1-7 :T,;C r4 /,k..� 4 G6,/ I( r.-, c. 1 124 ' '4 Ifia Iii __ . 0 J64( t__ — ' , ,v-tczA r efoi-tir F, / /1 2_ Dou Y1 �� _ ' IL /,,J --e CII//e.r I1 8a Lori V L1iS A ----- vc_i_LAL _____AA i\---N,_, c-c-- , -()_cl (_ 01 k r / i_z , 1, Yy0-1 � ( ail e- AL-(___ 2 11112- , l� .JC' ktcFl i-1 11 / r, L[1A- No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas, the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County (' ?-a --.17 Z-L' :1 kil,file oPP '(), (.74-) Li c7-72 ,;.—J...7-02 ,.. 0,/u ttqua),y,/y\ 1„V;_*_____ (6e../R? d-a-i Z z aklake V-1,1v1.e ,_il.;,, Orc{� f_ C�u,4 - � :9 a- ��,^,G1 Kr'cl,te 1- .�Z ii-f UjG. f7/2 L l' 07 HT-'3-Ari-,f 1 (l .0 712 2- -PAT M i i' 11r, K , 4, /&7 / c: fc'taP�,4-pi,‘wlc-- ; k--0�'' -e ‹le<Z/c< / ' j-0. 7 d- ' if /._,14,xii; j _ _ zvi� 2_1 7 /2 1 (_ St C ., lit ..,_ ,7_4,,,,z g\s_.,,,,,,--0 _,, ,,, L , --. D- -- v ' s-t( . r}cd,km B tact__ 02(, lb), T (tieeGt.eA 1 4 �+ Cal/,,,, C,,,,,,„ a. ,2��. cjc,„„t Q 6,-,/ _ 7 cot Cc`,, ,, . ,,)-1 zr, 1 a- G. a i c - ---ficAl .) 1---c No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County -5-* --,_:. v I'C C, Ci 1 ti 11)12114 I- //iCi()&:.6, -1W1 1 /14A . - - li i 1.1 (-11j 0<-: 14-W 41t -- Es 3 / 2 / c if /3/9z V - , 0, / . .' , .ap.1 A A. . % ' Vi.� - y A, fI�� = .�/,� a liffignEMAVERMETE igtir If E a I 1 1 lit E 6. - `��arig 0in �/ ? Q� , (2 /2.2, f/ - . e _� _ E I Z. rl� mach/ T z- / 3-'- Affiriliiini -Mr"..i...-OP_Aiiiiir ar‘ 3- --ZZ i, G L AI� / F 3�t��I - K�y1a /S1�t�s�c�x� j� do ic'`. `,)c�, �\;\ \1a`Y� `C)�c'� tV,� • yii t 'S 1 /0 l� ,5Lts,�►�/ �5 _,. - mil.. F1 �.t No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Aut•:r.,•L', County ? I`l 22 /' o,vro44ti , FILV ^9 s�.NAN(A / .*V-2_2. 4 - A.) tN-e...„, 101. i izi3L I i i Cc MillifiN171- d f 11" -MAgfir — ' .."1„# 419/ ee___ - . ►. b..b] ` L�`cto /--�- "`pima -- e-glev 101/z- z- 54,11% ( v :7, 1 i.PI] v._ t .6- C5jtti riz ri '-`;i R12_2_ oi icinak_. Muks C6ver 17( 2 kr L(k st).-.. ,, cj(S%LA.. 1\C-A`,.. N O. (..t.s, (:),.. .., (__R_ __ 5:--t___ --,/, \,.....--z_4 1,41(- -&- I\L\, ,Q, u) w-A-k. 1-1-1/Lc.) ii,(av 671,44111-tiv Cdt-eK ,c,..,-T,T.T-c„3._ co 1 ii Q -- A 3/7 c,)_ _./\, 1 _. A,Ic, _____ -(N C G:11,- /0--lr 0. --z- 1i oclA VA-J ita D C.ba)- ` -d I 72 Vy-ni c-k r\ T Q)c\ f " . 7,L �' � c , ► 1 ; - JictI2 Z 4<c�, u ee►n Co/6, 1,-- , c/274-e--.077-b-j r-e____ 146 /2-')- A t )- rk-n\-rini„ � tax -- _ . co (4.-e�" II y-e- b'- tle ../ No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelesslv transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor, we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County 5 g u YI G s c4 a, kaebe. Pic L`ev - g' f cj- ?`z k�`-/� Pets Oft) "/ 1-)02--6J..o(L-, 942-e44A,L, (9( 3 i 7 72_ ) 229 4- c,/,/r) 0#' ... 3-19- ,91 ,5frif f-2-- -j4tok 44kct\i 6-o--- ie ( 1w• t. 0eri-0 Ci;rye C` x. '�I►cIZz itU` ►5 C6k <�ear _ zz- /6 ., o e, c /' Cho/4-/--- 5ligy� �� Iv OcA. 6vr �� �--� C0 /Infer 3 / 4`)4 .��E,l� ,dN/_-i ` �! cf i,F, -/ 1ei./2 y_e, ,„...A_-,,,_ c../4 z P---- 7,2 !> Ind Scirr 3)iqJa Roby ,5a t t0.- ',ea/ J ( ,, 51 k6XI zz \ VC1 CO\ k� 3/4P2'ZCI)/ GS C c�v vim, -52� ea/bee . No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelesslv transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the Internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro, and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4-Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. 11 Date Printed Name Ut rap County _.$/( ) SPYta 6 -)Lug c , cy1It 1,� ci 4 '� paof or°KL -Gr l/ i ' (.a -6 3,1( C . ar i 6(/'aw t/G/t4 -1/--- 17 Gv. e\ k._ i**- >Z---7.------ (2C4 iiU-t-' \ as CikApt\ viu Q, UvMkU A LO 3--( - .2 2 �o S c z o---T h -may ,, ), C_02 1.--<( 2.A___ .3- 11 - � )-, CvlYc &criN \ C� i1i w (>) \ ci\-1-v , `:--z \ck tANL(7)\--e_v. LCIL- 04 ' 1_.e-e. (q)-7. -&c,, IM-s 1— -� , ,t, -,oto ccJiezA,--- rz �//cr.-6- (? l/. - i') 2Z tli 2T --?Acvc 'T ALE , 1lcci32- co; 2 tv1 bells h,(/ . C _ D( IC( co --5-)19,1A.9) - .fiiv Ioo4c4v-vP-idk 3 / ,__ T e Ba_ / Gem. vi 1)01 tall, t ,„ 11 ›.‘,44.4-,,- 3 //,f 7� 6:ve.;z-,e...- No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autograph County 1 -%' '' -7 ., t,t-6 rive u v t<-( r b p ' 0-(,, (�c Cof( le ."! ...s z2- a(C I4-1. q_ve r i• Lc_ nn / L- [0 Z c-'1 N'6 C at V - C'o ! iAn _.- -/Ls L 1- .10-A 1:.; (:),-z71--, ,,,, / ALA-Z-1, (..;. 3 . -22' 4\- , NV SC<1is I 3 to / Zz. Lc(c c 6f' 6; rG.,, , P j ic 3 /l -1--L , M Cl r <` ,� �� c, \,1, 1,.e�;- ,, , ,._,,_ ,..,_ -, .._<_:-,,,,,,--- i _,' //tr A2_, I j —I a_e70-0/1.--M-4- e) lid-4&11--- 4--i'es .::). , )—Z 01e.c^A I 5 v / en vl. n/tic ti� et,, �`6., I (3\ to �' -� ( , k42 __/,4 No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems; and, Whereas,the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem, verification of inability to connect to the internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name _ Autograph County :5\ \C ' \4A.. \\\,. ..\j.)_.)., CA‘-)-------\\ \ ‘ 'S---' e.`,\)..",- --AI( t V L .1-4 Z x '-ssL- // rfit/. gig; ,4e, ,, � tJ c2 /// , ,> Azi , lx -.4rci- c , rc- J /c -c.-.A ih-d--i Cic,C4'&A) --yi -- .6-Ao64\izA , iyy . ic . , , . , ,..6 e-42,z,),, ,:lz/ do__=1)ill 6-ci Er,_,4,--' (7 Fe/w a.-a/ /?c c 1 gel,- �.� z Al / _ /2G P/ �vi/t'frexy 4,.(.1, Ik 2-h 3/%, 5 �-J .l ,3 nn 3..zL - ,. t+ A c�}�1 �,,t,. 3// 5- tines L✓. Oft'",c y —v!/� u-4tii: of--aLG/L i ti, ‘iet1-1-- Bilix-YMi / i Li.:,. ., (-2,///,m) 51c. ' ."ei-N -i/,:tr / , t - - //,,,_ ..„,, ,,\_, _____\,......,,, ,,,,,\,„ Q......:,-,-%„,..„. ,..., .., /�C'c fire io� '‹ Z�L ' Izr0� /C 1 i&-_. 17 Vr' )�^' 97:&j ''2r, �, < <-- I ,`'_1-- f No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.015 establishes the Standards for voting systems;and, Whereas, the free citizens of Florida seek to strengthen election integrity by ensuring that the voting systems used are not connected to the internet, do not have a modem,and do not have the ability to transfer data electronically. Therefor,we the people, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro,and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.015 by inserting the following language: 101.015(4)(a)4—Verification of no modem,verification of inability to connect to the Internet, verification of inability to transfer data electronically. Date Printed Name Autggrah County - )1 _A. `)r a-1"1.5 c_ ILL (�d tf. f L. 3- I1 c)a A\\\ s :g\c-fsk� - ' ( Lee . ()CL-. r ,. ,,,_ _ FL 33 " / 7 a-� cjlf(�.., /CCtr — I,e /7 Z7i �:�� l <, --------- --, L.c pC.__ z '�= 1 l=Er i-4 , / 3 ._ 14- _a,.., ' ,,,- L ,-,..k_ -' 5 A-"A_K_I- :i--F 1- 0 r Li 7 - � L _ .�� Li,- f l t �-i- FL , c5-.. . cs//, 7, .3_ i ,:,_ .. 2_,z- Cec, . z__ ,-t----- s" C c % 3 -/ ZZ �, .S e f-- 4,0 - -n ti� -� ` 1'//�'�. 1 p� , 22- Cl CG.�1;AL &i re I) C__,_ ' z Y z -- 0 lii e ✓ / /22 4, - %�• Lz �� i',,�._, X:-. . /( /z_z d-inil r /fef 11_ .2/f� '1 ��" aYnC C4 Pi�[ P�O� , _ (/ O/c(f''l� 3f as 6,0 mAsu 2,...-- ri:bot nn t c v-e1 I.e C\4L---tiy 1_ I S-c,,-.6-_,JS-e_____ . f 141 Li ,/ 1�. 1 A . ,� _ L f-------- v l Whereas,the use of electronic vote counting machines that are connected to the Internet and/or use a modem to wirelessly transfer voting data and election results is subject to interference from hackers, foreign governments,or domestic parties; and, Whereas,the integrity of our elections is of utmost importance to our Republic;and, Whereas, a vote counting system that uses a modem and/or connects to the internet is unacceptable to the free people of the State of Florida; and, Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.5606 lists the requirements for approval of systems. Therefore,We The People, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.5606 by adding the following: (16) It does not have a modem and does not have the ability to connect to the internet. (17) It does not have the ability to send any election information wirelessly. Date Printed Name Autograph County dbolda L1 '174 1-c t-Latccy-i44mos 4I,Ltt i1 jzz ��v NJc� -1.e r I-1-1 � 1- �.�... �-� � � � c5 f' i�r f? lbl t�� l+Cl it 6'I 1��D� -t�' �1`'4r.t i adhe ` oL4,(2 L_ /hci r,' 6/t',i S cr'\ 7) u-t-C_../7--6-4.e0-'1-- 241 z z i&-e/C -- / Frril.!/l✓' ,,i '' (. K.�,//,"?-A-- 03,40 2.2 3Y p,, elf,,. 0. acre%g.)2___ lv ,� --iG itl ti C� � IFArga ' - a - ,D110);): V 'na1 Ca l r 4y oJi 1.66 ,far r ,, �— tiC�.Ce.1 : //0/2.z L d-A.er mac.6r I:( //f-C-,- A i, 1, f',,y -?. oil r •,•j 1 `\`. e c,t, k`_ -1111 4' c\ (,.: 61 Whereas, the use of electronic vote counting machines that are connected to the Internet and/or use a modem to wirelessly transfer voting data and election results is subject to interference from hackers, foreign governments, or domestic parties; and, Whereas,the integrity of our elections is of utmost importance to our Republic;and, Whereas, a vote counting system that uses a modem and/or connects to the internet is unacceptable to the free people of the State of Florida;and, Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.5606 lists the requirements for approval of systems. Therefore,We The People, lawfully and formally, petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo, Bob Rommel, David Borerro and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.5606 by adding the following: (16) It does not have a modem and does not have the ability to connect to the Internet. (17) It does not have the ability to send any election information wirelessly. Date Printed Name Autoph County /2/13/))- t.\-4-N_L e.._..-7\_...2.-------,.. ( 1- A- o› \‘-»\- - --a),Q V D-i\WHO\ - * C9a/lX WI-) U-_ t 2 I 1 /, )-)-. 12.1ci-ril 0.0 T-E1.-- 7 4 3 i 0-((--e- !//3/2.2 /J-(rl6d a 4rk�r `0_ Dfi--37g-- ri A rv44> r\t‘ Vey( - ,-6-__/., 0_,1---,.___-, (.1r_re?_ ) i . . - our 6--- .- _ •.0 _44-ii- yrt-4-1-/\.., , ej/ Iie �� LA 0164 .< t) 0,�1( 4 >,.�,�4 n�, ilk71( (� I I I -A/ f) , ,?_—,..._ ,tom ti L--__ t` ( 0)_:_r r \\\\1,(1J \LL,L IQ; I\A . _,/ 4 jiy �� Koh/Ad tc__ .�o,U r �, ���e v 414/vz_ kti"lc4 U�ce�o �I v 4t';//2:Z i ..,Y)Acy )Jr.—) 6AQA) (ti-ln- JXPeTv A % , 4 10 o7 /q/ A thb ,, bo 'C _ No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas,the use of electronic vote counting machines that are connected to the internet and/or use a modem to wirelessly transfer voting data and election results is subject to interference from hackers,foreign governments,or domestic parties;and, Whereas,the integrity of our elections is of utmost importance to our Republic;and, Whereas,a vote counting system that uses a modem and/or connects to the internet is unacceptable to the free people of the State of Florida;and, Whereas, Florida State Statute 101.5606 lists the requirements for approval of systems. Therefore,We The People,lawfully and formally,petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo,Bob Rommel, David Borerro and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.5606 by adding the following: (16) It does not have a modem and does not have the ability to connect to the internet. (17)It does not have the ability to send any election information wirelessly. Date Printed Name Autograph County 1- /z -Z 2- r Pam- - e.- (fi 'Y /i z/ ZZ C' �od o Sz a{) & b ( Co l I tcH' ' )i)a-Ir)- L.,I k fiCeZPr\ , I--el- ' 2 /2 22 tiA :-ct r =9 ' r11- t E IMIN • = .:. ' �' C= C c L L I e-12-- . t ,-- —& i.410.11=111111=3".'''Wfailledelf,e) 4.) , -9-� , � LL �( f � ( � � L�Lt� ` ,c��,i (c i-e ,, , ) -1 '\4\ (( L ►r`(l tii 1 i\3 411 01 )Tt(),,,kol ck,tiakti _. /7 .(6. ear,:aL [T,'11f n,c_ 4:c,4 2Cy. C di c z ?, n U• k 6 311—.e fir,,, C.". A / / it a �i3 . (�5 tee �� ii(616 2 1 '2:2-- . t'‘..\,. ci?cosp FA ) = L Li 0,,--- -- !' '. ,... 1 i1�. , J_i.: sit A/ ,�,-,fl rik 1 �' No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas,the use of electronic vote counting machines that are connected to the Internet and/or use a modem to wirelessly transfer voting data and election results is subject to interference from hackers,foreign governments, or domestic parties;and, Whereas,the integrity of our elections is of utmost importance to our Republic;and, Whereas,a vote counting system that uses a modem and/or connects to the Internet is unacceptable to the free people of the State of Florida;and, Whereas,Florida State Statute 101.5606 lists the requirements for approval of systems. Therefore,We The People,lawfully and formally,petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo,Bob Rommel, David Borerro and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.5606 by adding the following: (16) It does not have a modem and does not have the ability to connect to the internet. (17) It does not have the ability to send any election information wirelessly. Date Printed Name Autograph County 2//2/22 C11pr1,6C// i tiiir -rd&___ ! — ,f2C�.4q,e7) ti 7-1 ._7--- N.70tdr 65 E .,,g2 fa--J 41_ Iv\/C,We I\Aii,c - ;�i'� I . L Iia l-a , jc e ll)►I Dko-rN C -Q �I pk,i) ff------- p/bpg--isz. d 17. ?2- NA I( -C 911),tf r . c,..t.u c c--.,(ct ( ."-- (/ ( / -c-,-7 / 2,7 2,z_ jraiv ___,T Oipii, \ -,..„ _,....4 .1)0-e „ism 2, ,IZ--I 21 'rqtA/(,,r, A u 1 ? c_ ( " \tN- L-1-: / 401Ikt- 100 r I 7 ��7 , 7 Z P7-4i1 i (i24/- ,_ c,v�c,J f - ( I a / 0Z (Aa)nr\ 72e;-1j'(‘-'4/1 f � � i�r//0 z t���y r► e� eat,-/,'',/ap_11 d., C., ,,- .„,-,„).?. 0, ...c... t,-;,,,;$.., 0 t k.e ,., 2____ - /) -9_7 6\R icci,,,,)1 ( t ,,--2,11 i \,, ,'N-1.-w --,..„. / i' ; .e____\„. (2 . ck,`‘ -b.'16A\ 2 ' 1 i_ _ ........,---- ley 4, 1 -d, , -,),.a )(..k.,Itcq ---) - A, \,) : 1/4....0 , ,/4`2h 2 Piar/i A A z 4 4 6 c No Modem, No Internet Connection, No wirelessly transferred voting data in voting systems Whereas,the use of electronic vote counting machines that are connected to the Internet and/or use a modem to wirelessly transfer voting data and election results is subject to interference from hackers,foreign governments,or domestic parties;and, Whereas,the integrity of our elections is of utmost importance to our Republic;and, Whereas,a vote counting system that uses a modem and/or connects to the Internet is unacceptable to the free people of the State of Florida;and, Whereas,Florida State Statute 101.5606 lists the requirements for approval of systems. Therefore,We The People, lawfully and formally,petition our State Legislators Lauren Melo,Bob Rommel, David Borerro and Kathleen Passidomo to amend Florida State Statute 101.5606 by adding the following: (16) It does not have a modem and does not have the ability to connect to the internet. (17)It does not have the ability to send any election information wirelessly. Date Printed Name Autograph County Jj / r� LI t � 1,1(.02 CL' : c� i 1- 1... q , Chlie( m; I1-- �orz____/ Lee (c4 I _ �l� ( _ (00 ,- 2• l 2 2Z w/,J ,` 1-4- J1 .,— D�4� c __ , .-- --'-z_r.)-‘ 2-.1Z-Z2 5c64..) C-' SSt i ( )p.c.ice h >� 1l C.1. fp `vr{ ?- - �-- -- V(frerttl- . t 6.Tt ctc$0 (r c__6-- t/ 2, - V___ -27_. 90..\,le N-4v\A ' rcr,,,t,\pc 2- /2 - 2 a ._,Z.-("1-/'://1,1 e vi-- -). 2e;)</_ff- 4'17="T r(-../776') 710e1-- )_, a , I, L LIrfri/Z y 24 v/e/s1 . 0 1;(9(cA ', Z/ ( 1 /ZZ- Sc._vovtit � Ont.i \ S ' z - Palm 6cc1c.h /11,Ke itck.C1e- � -r- 711'& ,, A,S 2-1 ?-Z? (Lk.(lc C- CA -t(,,-u, 44 ) ---- iky qv,' .7,ak 9 Q ---Y-01,j) ) Tit-) ------ -st r'% (---L" ?____. . 3 ---1-i-c'-55 -, -..)2:(2--ei--_. -71 nin'N \\) yr? tI,A1) --0 0 elv.-, --0-9 ..,k,,,,,,, <19 it)-10k.iod u_ p - -ZiZ)it_7! / } CA91 it SC4 eel-t. ' , - -x-ol-A --1-f --a(c/ e .}--- ///02 ,) 7-, if' /7/..../),9y5 . /zy 17 7 2/c7/-z i7!)'7� J) / 3� / SriiN --z-4 ,---D 07 , , -kr y7 1.1/..11,7 I I Al ?14 rty-C-e Izo : 7 7 . ,ir , t -1-7-� ' -n -4 3. p p { 2,( /lad/ - v 3 L/3)l C. Z'r/1`r/r —,2„7-,,--,v7 25,-1,,,A,--------A -7----,1_4// -'/ ki q v-- -A•) -p,6,--r-Z`YZ 0--rt 1 ,,,_41,-A . ____..2_,,_r r.‘p . -p, _z cr- 14). -----1/\_ 1._ . 1i--2 (--, r T7 , ,D,? �U07-2 Y iv , _... .ail •A lk 1UlRtit) LlL , )cu. _A c-3! \i.:, . A3,,,,,y --.7.-y( -,r- --.1 - -?,4. _ci ee(e-61 - Awno3 ydeJNo.ny aweN paluud alea •AIssalaJiM uoilewuo}ui uoilpala Aue puas of Al!Ilge aql aney lou saop 11(LT) •lauialul aql of laauuoa of Allllge ayl aney Tou saop pue wapow e aney lou saop 11 (9I) :2uIMollo;aql 2ulppe Aq%%mot alnlelS ale1S epluold puawe o.owop!ssed uaalgleN pue oJJauog pima'lawwob qog'olaW uaune-sJolels!Sal awls uno uo!mad'AllewJo4 pue Alln;Mel 'aldoad all am'aJolaJaqi. •swalsAs Jo lenoudde Jul sluawaalnbai aq.slsll 909s•Zol a1n1e1S a1els epuold 'seaJagM 'pue`epuol j Jo ale1s aquo aldoad aail all of algeldaaaeun sl lawalu!aql of slaauuoa Jo/pue wapow e sasn will walsAs 2u1lunoa awn e'seauaym 'pue'allgndab Jno of aaueluodwl lsowln Jo sl suollaala uno jo Alp2alul aq.'seaJagm 'pue'sa1lJed DQsawop Jo 'sluawwano2 AaJol'sJa peq wou;aauaJa}Jalul of laafgns sl sllnsaJ uo!pala pue elep&ualon JalsueJl AIssalaJ!M of wapow e asn Jo/pue lauJalu!aql o.papauuoa aJe ley.saulgaew 2ullunoa aloe aluoilaala to asn ail. swa}sAs Nu! on u! elep NuRon panajsue4 Alssalaainn oN 'uoipauuoD lawaluI ON 'wapow ON -4,Y /17?.z2 ) , --'7 -V/a 1 r 7 ° - — .-2 J':// I) ;/ yl.,y1,�� ,etr y_.-y/.2-7 KT-, ciN)FAyfi)..olY A r n'c'Z1a. g 5,c4( C' ` 1 ' I --7 /�"`(-}-��'1'7 l' AT 7 J L /(/ ' �ia)II ) S4uPS-9c� 1u 0 , )-,,,q g..) , -,./6--.1, -4:. pi- ;-I }-; n r ( e- 2.____, ,„ , 4-, 1'D K ( J ,,, _,,,,,,, _- „,‘ Za / (` Aluno) gdeJNOlny aweN paluud @lea •Aissalanm uoilewJo;ui uonaala Aue puas of Aliiige aql aneq lou saop 11 (LT) •lauwalui alp of laauuoa of Aliiige aql aneq lou saop pue wapow e aneq lou saop 31 (9T) :2uimoilo;aql 2uippe Aq 909S'TOT alnlelS alels epuoi j puawe of owopissed uaaigle>l pue oJiwog pine() 'lawwou qog'olaW uainei sioleis! al alels Jno uoililad'Ailewao;pue AIInlmel'aidoad aql am'aJo;aaagl •swalsAs Jo ienaadde Jo;sluawaainbaa alp s1s11909S'TOT alnlelS alelS epuoi j'seaaagM `pue'epuolj;o a1e2S agl;o aidoad aaa;alp of aigeldaaaeun si lawalui aql of slaauuoa Jo/pue wapow e sasn lag walsAs 2uilunoa alon a'seaJa4M 'pue'aiigndaa Jno of aaueluodwi lsowln Jo si suoilaala Jno;o Alu2a1ui agl'seaaagm 'pue'saiped ailsawop ao'sluawwano2 u2laJo;'sJalaeq wog;aauaaa}Jalui of laaigns si slinsaa uo!pala pue elep 2uilon aa;sueJl Aissalaaim of wapow e asn Jo/pue lauwalui aql of palaauuoa am legs sauigaew 2uilunoa aeon alualaala Jo asn agl'seaaagm swalsAs NuRoA u! elep Nupon paaJaJsue.n.Aissalai!M oN 'uoipauuoD lauaaluI oN 'wapow ON • p ,�. . . if' -ter L.,s.y G' 9/n t i 2'4�1` '' , l f?l LT�-tee , � i , -C-c/t/ - ' \`2742/1"6f1 '2.,1 /ZI ' fr�G i d 6t) , 4 ) (1) ) ' ",, , ,e ., t-i.q/f-Y-w 1,-10kA4A-d-sr)1 A-73 1 �4v� /i% v-►� �,J, j� �ry C 2 r - 1-C �% � - �°ice_ � �a� !� i %r y2i1.3-. _ j 7'yr —73-77-----v . ,%' -k . /' ,. d v�� tl tia>>> o 9_•S')u,. ""2-i,n41 J1 2 t/ Viz) • 1 - ' ' ; Q ..-- -----7—M-757-7/Z7)' --7 ..?7(?/' . / P2-7-7 )3/ )--.47,,r/ z --4 • --/ -))--7.)---yrryl r .,) . vnxi_v-2- --.,, c_yvoic-7 -7,2--y-V:), -e.y/LV . 1_,j, --- - --......- ,z-:, I---,-----,c),--,-, ,_---x-.....Th--5 .?f,r-Lk-7/1 7\27A ( --ct (0-1-6 -)„,..,,, ,2,..:.,,,--), 7 c._,_ 1.,,a,,,,t-ev ._,?5! --\;,..R Q..... -k,-r 1 1,,e-i r __/4_,(1') ?- i'� (NV-1 ikfd p Ii/ ar(?,-�� 7 h}uno) J�olny aweN palulad ale° ' •hlssalaJIM uo!lewao}u! uogoala hue puas o}h3llige aq;aney lou saop 11 (LI) •lawaTul agi.ol.pauuoa of h;Illge aqi.aney Tau saop pue wapow e anal lou saop ll (9T) :2u!Mollo} NI.2ulppe Aq 909S-10T alnlels alels epuold puawe ol.owoplssed uaalq}e>l pue oaaaaog pined `lawwod qog 'ola,j uaanel saolelsPai dials in() uo!lp.ad 'hliewao}pue Alin}Mel 'aldoad am_am'aao}aaagl •swalshs}o lenoadde aol sTuawaalnbaa aql slsll 9095'TOT alnleTs alels eplaol j 'seaaaq/N `pue `epuolu}o awls aql}o aldoad aaa}aq} o}algeldaaaeun sI lawalul aq;o1 spauuoa ao/pue wapow e sasn legl waTshs 2upuno3 awn e 'seaaatw 'pue`allgndaJ ano of aaueTaodwl lsowln to sI suo!pale ano}o AT!J alu! agl'seaaagM 'pue 'sagied a!lsawop JO `sTuawwanoB uaIaao} 'saapeq wall aauaaa}aai.ul of pafgns sI sllnsaa uo!pala pue elep Su!Ton aa}sueal hlssalaa!M o1 wapow e asn Jo/pue TawaTul aqa.o1 papauuoa ale lap saulgaew 2u!lunoa elan aluoJ gala jo asn agl'seaaagM —'V 00 w pr77).0 ZoZ Z4 `1 U L c � i7 ---�'") " ' h L f,-)�.,i if -5 ) )111 2-6- 0') 7 1 n G-+-7J vv(-j I-N9NJ-�tt Z -L-C 2'1//.i 72 _ ____ _ /7,j-j Mr;if 6))9 1 57 1,, i ,:)-D \ 1 rrya V1)S1�1 c >INAct\A. -te- L-cc:�+' I U lV-YrD7P lk l'' ? j' ,1(1 I! "Vic .1 ,11) ".4;) b- 11 , %--- . 1., 1 urtAki CC—L-2 __Ivry) 7rc.) Nydle?,1 e-rfr)-vs '0-9)/1 -Vb(Ad --&---L /b'l)up - \ 5 U \D./ !J\ 21,z . Q )1/7 ,,i! /1 =f rY -v7i'.'7 -z(T _J ,-) y i ."_?J kl in- '"----0,1 ? 1 \ ) - 1 -.) ) 1� I ‘‘,,,,,,,,r, -Lc -ti _ gdeJNo4ny f n}unoJ eN pa4uiad a;ea •AIssaIaJ!M uoi4ew.ioi.u! uoipala Aue puas of/t4i!ige aql aneq lou saop 11 (AZ) •4awa4u! aq4 o4 4aauuoa o4 p!ige aq}aneq 4ou saop pue wapow e aneq}ou saop 11 (g ) :2u!MolIo4 ail}2uippe Aq 9095•101 a3n4e4S alelS epiaoU j puawe o}owopissed uaameN pue OJJaJog pined lawwod gog 'olaW uaanei sJo4eIs!Ba1 awls no uogq.ad 'Aflewao3 pue/lIn3Me) 'aidoad aql am'aJo4aJagj •swa4s/ts Jo IenoJdde aoj s4uawaainbaa aql s4si!9095•101 aln}els aTe4S epuoI j `seaaaqM `pue `epuolj}o alels aqT jo aidoad aaa.aql o}ame}daoDeun si 4awaaui agl.oi.spauuoa Jo/pue wapow e sasn legl.wa4sAs 2ui4unoa aeon e 'seaaagM 'pue`aHgndab mno o;aaue}aodw!}sow}n 3o s! suoi4Daja ano 3o 4.12ai.ui agl'seaaagM 'pue 'saiied ai4sawop JO's4uawuaana u2!aJoj 'sJa)aeq woa3 aauamapa;u!o4 pargns s! slinsaa uoi}gala pue elep 2ui4on iaisueal.AjssatamiM o4 wapow e asn Jo/pue 4awa4u! alp.oi.papauuoa an legl.sauigDew Bu!lunoD a}on aiuo.i}aaJa 4o asn aqf`seaaagM 7 f ` 1 .) y Sti N —,.,11 D ---- s.....4?._ , „2.. 1 (,/) 1 ,,, Z /r l/z .-)Pd y/ ' ) Cr'�'7 ' r rE 5 0 v('7 yT- `is '1,l/ / ____, a y: '.1 I%'-j/y,die .j �'-� e/ 7_/ /7 ,.�' _rfi i � pct.A...?„. � //4J `��L,v , // J ojs) , >>J� j —7 jI 2 7 4 ! -, ) c' J /1) ,) 0 1 _7(tS P \1 '1 S Z Z i jI prod 4 SI 1 1 I`\id_ -e-t 1 y•Lf),-4—_, 1.)-\. _ ,.7-1 0 T2:1_ ,44)10,x__-] m K—, AlunoJ gd'ea o}ny aweN pa1ulad also •AlssalaalM uoi4ewao4ui uoipala Aue puas oi.A}ilige aye aney lou saop}I (Li) •}awalul aye GI pauuoa of Aline ayp aney 4ou saop pue wapow a aney lou saop 11 (gi) :8uiMollo3 ay}Ouippe Aq 9095'101 aln3elS aleIS epiaojJ puawe 01 owopissed uaalyfe)l pue oaaaaog pinea 'lawwoa qoe 'olaL uaanei saoleis! a1 awls ano uop.p.ad 'Lllewaoj pue Alinyv ei `aldoad ayl BM'aaolaaagl •swa;sAs}o lenoadde Joj sluawaainbaa aql sls!I 909S'IOI alnlelS aWe1S epu(3l-J `seaaagM `pue `epuoy Jo aw}S aqi.jo aldoad aaag aye o}algeldaDoeun sl 2auaalui ay;o;spauuoa ao/pue wapow a sasn }eye walsAs 2up.uno3 aloft e'seaaagM 'pue`aiigndau ano of aaue}aodwi}sowln 4o sl suolpala ano jo/ u alui ayp'seaaagM 'pue 'sapaed 3i;sawop ao 's}uawuaano2 u2iaao4 'saa)pey woJI aauaaapalui oa.pafgns si slinsaa uol}gala pue elep Sui}on aalsuea}AissalaaiM of wapow e asn ao/pue lauaalui ay}oi.papauuoa am}eye sauiyaew 2up.unoD awn aluopaala 4o asn atp'seaaagM RI 1v i I I�SK011.0313 vaiiis 11 suoc;aajaJuioo-.piioi.3ALt['SOQ • (xe i) GIZ9'SVVOS8 • 00Z9'SVZ'OS8 66£ZE ePPDIA `aasseuefiny • 1aai1S t{ nouoig u1noS OOS • 9TE alms '21111)itng kelp -V•g suotloNg 3o uotsIAIQ (t) sluatugaelpv -nu/JAI I IAI •spioaa.t.mop(ioj pasopua s!aleat;paaa atp ;o Adoa v •uzalsds pai;p.raa atp;o uo!spna.z sap of allJ2nu lsntu )(alp 'oo sa ag1;o Aliligpdea tuapouz of uozpaA aq1 4ulsn anupuoa ao'ot,01 stuapout O£.natp apeadn of pualut sapunoa;i 'aao;aaagJ '610Z't£•Iaquzaaau Jaw aleaado lou IITM uoIsina.t slip Xq paia;;o appAdn ateMuiat;ail 2upaei uzapom of, uozuaA s,00ZSQ Aue 'aslMafq '610Z 'L£ .zagtuaaaQ Jaw alp.zado you IIT.M mapouz �£ uozuaA s,OOZSQ aq.L '6I0Z 'I£ xagtua)aa Aq 'suzapotu uozzaaA OOZSG IIe 811paa;;e sngl 'x.zoMlau o£/VIAkD 43p2al sli uMop1ngs of sueid'ssalai!M uoz!JaA'zaanpapnuptu uzapotu at11, 'OOZSQ atlp u!mapotu OL,uoziaaA alp o1 app z$dn azpMuz cz;papaau a saaj;o Ogg agl 'Aiipai;paadS •aleaz;pzaa pies ;o t uopsnay $uzpnpui pup '(S28Sg-a808I# aleDupia)) „Z uoisaaA 'O'£'S't aseaiag 'SAg„ s,S2sSg iapun paz;p.zaa aoppinq i lunoa-laupard 00ZSa aq1 spjje ZZOI OD3 -(Z uotstnag)SVS3-LZ8O9t# „Z u0is1Aa>I 'Z uotszaA'0•£•c,•t,aspaia l is „ sp uMouI Xgaaaq Si uozsznaa siq,i,•tuaIs/Cs$upon pat;paaa papaa;;e aql 01 uo!s!Aa1 a palplzssaaau suq galgM 1•1p;S -pH '(q)(£) so95-Lot uorpaas tp!m aauepaoDDP ui au (cm) .zap a2upgp uuaauzSug(S28Sg)soil la n MM;oS 28 stuapsAs tropaaig pano.tdde suq suopaaig;o uorsIAIQ aq j (z uotsinaN)S25'Sg-LZ808L# (Z uotspnag) Z uots.taA'0•£•S'f aspala2I 'SAg :.LD3filf1S 6 LOZ '9 Ap AJ :g.Lva suofaaig;o uorsTAIQ 'JolaaILQ i\.\ bsg 'sMatplpw •I uppiSI :t\ioNd ,` suopaaig jo szospuadnS :O.L *palaau0 , wriaNVxoInlavnI a1t;1S)o kteloloas .tou1anoD 32'I 'IN 'I32Illd'I sisusivsaa NMI 1.LVIS JO IN3 JIIIVd 1Q VQ I1IO'1d 4. ,out• v.. .44 it 1 S OID313 4 lu v'NI I'4 ,VUI O1i suopaalattuoo•eppol3AWSOU • (xuA) LTZ9'StZ'OS8 • 0OZ9'SbZ'OS8 �'�+� 66£Z£ upt.'ol,4 `aassYgPlley • laas;s 142nouoig ipnoS 00S • 9i£ alms ' uiplrng Auio •V•g suoT;aaj3;o uoisiAtc '61.0Z'IC.iagwaaaQ Jaw ale.rado iou IIrM uotsinai stgi Aq paaa};o apei2dn alemuul3 alai Butxae! luapow Jt uoz!aaA s,00ZSQ Sue 'as!Ma)iq •6t0Z 't£ zaquiaaaQ Jaw aieaado iou IIiM wapow OE uozi.iaA S,00ZS(1 aqi '610Z 'i£ ThgwaaaQ Aq 'suzapow uoz!JaA OOZSQ Iie 2upaa;;e sngi 'poMaau O£/dyVQJ Ape$a! Si! uMop ings oi sueld 'ssala!M uozi_zaA '1ainpe;nuew wapolu ag..L 'OOZSQ alp ui wapow Di, uozi.iaA alp of ape.i&dn aUUMlu1i; papaau e sia3jo ZZOt OJ3 •uopeaiJllzaa Jo;uopeaildde ixau alp of ioud a.nniea; 2uq.ioda.i uopein$ijuo aieMp.ieq s,pOZSQ alp of sa ueg3 ale.iod1oDu! dopuan alp ietp 3up!nba.i ospe st uolsini j au•ainleaj $up.iodai uope11$i;uoJ aJeMp1eq alp uo ape.i do alp jo siaajja alp '1tlleDulaads 'apei2dn aqi jo slielap alp jo sapunoa s28si papa;;e Ajpou oi pa.itnbai Si .iopuan alp '£uoiS1Aa21 so; lenordde aqi ;o lied sv •Z uo!spnaJ sapasiadns £ uoIsina21 •anoge paiou se'(E uo!sina?1)S28SE-LZ808t#Se ZZOI OJI aqi pano.idde seq uo!stA!Q alp pue Jn;ssaaans SUM sisai;o punoi Ise!aq j •dupsai-as ioj sale;Mau pappAoad iopuan alp'Xpuanbasgns•Xlaadoad )IaoM of 4uilie; ap u do aaeMtam aqi ui 2upinsa1 'ep!1old ut waisAs alp ;o suo!saan 2ups!xa oi algeagdde iou aq oI punoj.ram aiaM aopuan alp Aq pap!Aoid sap; apiii do aqi '.iaAaMoH 'ZZOt Ma Jo Bupsai aal;e'6IOZ'9 AiIN uo paseala2 Apuaaai SUM(Z uo!s!na21)SzgSg-LZ808t#aieat;p.iaJ ` •(E uoisina21)S28Sd-LZ808t# „£uotsinaJ 'Z uois1aA '0•E'S•f aseala21 'SAd„ se uMou)l Agaiaq Si uoisinaU silty-waists Bupon pai:itaa palaa;Je aqi of uois!na.i e paieiissaaau sell 4Ji4M 'leis 'e!d '(q)(£) SO9S'tOt Uopaas qi!M aauepaoaae u! ZZOL (OJa) aapaO auegJ . $uuaaui..2ug(98sd)say!'aaiMi;oS ig swaisAs uopaalg panoldde seq suopaalg jo uo!S!A!Q NI ' / (E uotsinad)S2b'S3-LZ8081# (£uots!Aag) Z uoiszaA 'O'£'S'i'aseala?1 'SAE :1J3fans 6LOZ '9t XIlAi :RIVC1 " •, •4 g JO UOTSIA!Q 'ioiaaJTQ ! �' • sd 'SMaglielAI 1e1zeIMI :vAIO2Id I( , ` suopaaJE;o siosiA2adns :OZ INf1QNV IOIAIdYAI iouion.00 a3uIS 3o fcJ81 JoaS SI,LI�ItfSS Q isTO?i Sal 'W 'iaxnez 3IVLS JO ,LNdWfl1dd IQ dQI2iOl3 ray +" • ..: = ?"•. 0 Page 2 Therefore, if counties intend to upgrade their 3G.modems to 4G,or continue using the Verizon 4G modem capability of the DS200, they must migrate to this revision of the certified system. A copy of the certificate is enclosed for your records. MIM/cec Attachments (1) ,1