Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 04/07/2022
Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 3/31/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 April 7, 2022 9: 00 AM Edwin Fryer- Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Karl Fry- Secretary Christopher Vernon Paul Shea, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Robert Klucik, Jr. Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. April 2022 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 3/31/2022 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. PL20210001560 - An Ordinance Of The Board Of County Commissioners Of Collier County, Florida, That Simplifies Replatting Golden Gate Estates Tracts By Amending Ordinance Number 04-41, As Amended, The Collier County Land Development Code, Which Includes The Comprehensive Land Regulations For The Unincorporated Area Of Collier County, Florida, To Create Site Design Standards And Waive Subdivision Improvements For The Subdividing Of Golden Gate Estates Tracts, By Providing For: Section One, Recitals; Section Two, Findings Of Fact; Section Three, Adoption Of Amendments To The Land Development Code, More Specifically Amending The Following: Chapter Four – Site Design And Development Standards, Including Section 4.03.06 – Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions; And Appendix B – Typical Street Sections And Right-Of-Way Design Standards; Section Four, Conflict And Severability; Section Five, Inclusion In The Collier County Land Development Code; And Section Six, Effective Date. [Coordinator: Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner] April 2022 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 3/31/2022 2. PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Residential Single- Family-1 (RSF-1) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as Palisades RPUD to allow construction of up to 36 detached single-family dwelling units, on property located on the west side of Yarberry Lane, south of Orange Blossom Drive and west of Airport-Pulling Road in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25, East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 12± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] 3. PL20200000115 - GMPA - Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to change the Mixed Use District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to the Mixed Use District, Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict; to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 TO 690; to remove churches and child care facilities as allowed uses; and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located on the Northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Lord's Way in Section 14, Township 50South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69± ACRES. [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner] 4. PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 08-41, the First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, as amended, to change the name of the MPUD to Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD; to remove the day care use and allow the church use as an interim use for up to 5 years; to increase the number of dwelling units from 306 units to 690 units with 76 affordable housing units; and to reallocate the uses, revise the development standards and the PUD master plan for the PUD property consisting of 69± acres located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) and Hacienda Lakes Parkway formerly Lord’s Way, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] B. Noticed 10. Old Business 11. New Business A. Updated Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Growth Management Plan consistency determination. April 2022 Collier County Planning Commission Page 4 Printed 3/31/2022 B. Housing That is Affordable 101 - Presentation from Jacob LaRow, Housing Manager This memorandum is authored to introduce the PowerPoint Presentation “Housing 101” developed by Jacob LaRow, the manager for Housing, Grant Development & Operations. The presentation is fulfilling a request of the Planning Commission to have primer discussion with Housing before the final four initiatives of the 2017 Community Housing Plan come before the Planning Commission for recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 04/07/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: PL20210001560 - An Ordinance Of The Board Of County Commissioners Of Collier County, Florida, That Simplifies Replatting Golden Gate Estates Tracts By Amending Ordinance Number 04-41, As Amended, The Collier County Land Development Code, Which Includes The Comprehensive Land Regulations For The Unincorporated Area Of Collier County, Florida, To Create Site Design Standards And Waive Subdivision Improvements For The Subdividing Of Golden Gate Estates Tracts, By Providing For: Section One, Recitals; Section Two, Findings Of Fact; Section Three, Adoption Of Amendments To The Land Development Code, More Specifically Amending The Following: Chapter Four – Site Design And Development Standards, Including Section 4.03.06 – Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions; And Appendix B – Typical Street Sections And Right-Of-Way Design Standards; Section Four, Conflict And Severability; Section Five, Inclusion In The Collier County Land Development Code; And Section Six, Effective Date. [Coordinator: Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 04/07/2022 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Growth Management Development Review Name: Richard Henderlong 02/07/2022 8:44 AM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 02/07/2022 8:44 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Eric Johnson Additional Reviewer Completed 02/07/2022 10:05 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 02/14/2022 10:27 AM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 02/16/2022 2:31 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 03/09/2022 10:30 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 03/11/2022 6:21 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/07/2022 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 5 1 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT PETITION PL20210001560 ORIGIN Growth Management Department (GMD) SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT This amendment establishes design requirements for when existing Golden Gate Estates (GGE) tracts of land are subdivided into three or more lots. It requires an access driveway, utility and drainage easement when a GGE tract that isn’t located on an existing right-of-way is subdivided. It further allows a GGE tract to be subdivided without any subdivision improvements when all of the lots front on an existing right-of-way or road easement. HEARING DATES LDC SECTION TO BE AMENDED BCC TBD CCPC 03/17/22 DSAC 02/02/22 DSAC-LDR 01/19/22 4.03.06 Appendix B Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions Typical Street Sections and Right-of-Way Design Standards ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS DSAC-LDR Approved with change DSAC Approved with change CCPC TBD BACKGROUND This amendment seeks to clarify and require an access driveway and improvements’ to other lots when vacant GGE tracts, that are not located on an existing roadway, are subdivided into lots which must connect through an existing roadway frontage lot. Currently, when subdividing a GGE platted tract into three or more lots, the Land Development Code (LDC) requires construction plans and plat approval (PPL) for the re-plat of a Golden Gate Estates land tract. In GGE, Casthely Place and Chesser Subdivisions are examples of a subdivision re-plat that did not require any subdivision or infrastructure improvements for the replat of a portion of Tract 8 and Tract 3 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 1. Rustling Pines and McCarthy Subdivisions are an example of subdividing a tract into 3 lots from the front of the tract to the back of the tract which does require an access easement and driveway and cul-de-sac or turnaround improvement between the second and third lot or solely on the third lot. (See Exhibit A-Subdivisions and Minor Replats). The replating of a tract or subdivision for the landowner is an expensive, time consuming process and requires Board approval prior to recording the replat. This amendment shall exempt certain GGE tracts of land from Construction Plan and Final Subdivision Plat (PPL), the “plans and plat” process, when there are no required subdivision or infrastructure improvements. However, for those GGE tracts of land that are subdivided from the front of the tract into additional lots that are behind the front lot abutting an existing right-of-way, it shall require an access, utility and drainage easement, a constructed driveway and cul-de-sac or turnaround improvement. The Golden Gate Estates tract landowner shall benefit by not having the added expense of a replat in one case and in the other, the future lot owners shall have the subdivider’s assurance of a perpetual access, utility and drainage easement with the benefit of the construction of a driveway improvement in accordance with the design standards stipulated in Appendix B-7. Currently, the Collier County Public Utilities Department as a matter of policy, for the Estates (E) zoned 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions) 2 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx lots has no mandatory utility connections regardless of the main size. Estates zoned lots are prohibited from connection to transmission mains. The design requirements shall be implemented through the process and procedure set forth in LDC section 10.02.04 D. and Chapter 5 F of the Administrative Code. An applicant would request a pre- application meeting unless waived by the County Manager or his designee and file a “Minor Subdivision Plat Application” with the Development Review Division. In general, a minor final subdivision plat (FP) does not require improvements, a construction maintenance agreement, a security performance bond, a landscape buffer, or phasing. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Recommendations The subcommittee unanimously recommended approval on January 19, 2022 with the following change to LDC section 4.03.06 A. 2.: “When platted Golden Gate Estates tracts are subdivided into three or more lots from front to back and one or more such lots do not front on an existing right-of-way, the owner or subdivider of the tract shall be responsible to provide access to all lots by constructing a 20 feet wide driveway...”. DSAC Recommendations The committee unanimously recommended approval on February 02. 2022 with the DSAC-LDR subcommittee’s recommendation to include the following text to LDC section 4.03.06 A.2: “The driveway shall be installed and inspected prior to plat recording.” The aforementioned recommendations have been incorporated in the LDC text. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS There are no anticipated fiscal or operational impacts associated with this amendment. GMP CONSISTENCY The proposed LDC amendment has been reviewed by Comprehensive Planning staff and may be deemed consistent with the GMP. EXHIBITS: A) Subdivisions and Minor Replats 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions) DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted 3 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx Amend the LDC as follows: 1 2 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 3 4 A. Applicability: Lot Divisions for Residential Use in Golden Gate Estates. 5 6 1.When a 5 acre parcel in Golden Gate Estates is subdivided into 2 lots, 7 where one of the lots is not on the existing right-of-way, the owner may shall 8 create an access easement to and through the parcel which is not on the right-of- 9 way. The easement must be at least 20 feet in width and extend at least 150 feet 10 into the otherwise landlocked lot and shall serve as an access, utility, and 11 drainage easement. The easement shall provide for access to the lot and satisfy 12 the frontage requirement. 13 14 2.When platted Golden Gate Estates tracts are subdivided into three or more lots 15 from front to back and one or more such lots do not front on an existing right-of- 16 way, the owner or subdivider of the tract shall be responsible to provide access 17 to all lots by constructing a 20 feet wide driveway with a minimum 6 inches 18 compacted lime rock over 12 inches stabilized subgrade and a minimum 3 inches 19 of dust-free gravel surface course within a 30-foot wide access, utility and 20 drainage easement (See Appendix B-7) and a cul-de-sac or turnaround 21 acceptable to the local fire district. The easement shall provide for access to the 22 rear lots and satisfy the frontage requirement. The driveway shall be installed 23 and inspected prior to plat recording. For this subsection, the aggregate platted 24 Golden Gate Estates tracts being subdivided shall not exceed 20 acres. When 25 the requirements of this subsection are met, there shall be no required 26 subdivision improvements. 27 28 3. When Golden Gate Estates tracts are subdivided into three or more lots, all of 29 which front on an existing right-of-way, there shall be no required subdivision 30 improvements. 31 32 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 33 34 APPENDIX B- TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS AND RIGHT-0F-WAY DESIGN STANDARDS 35 Cul-De-Sac B-2 Local Street B-3 Commercial/Industrial B-4 Minor Collector B-5 Major Collector B-6 Dustless Gravel Driveway-GGE Access Easement B-7 36 37 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions) DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted 4 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx 1 2 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions) DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted 5 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx 1 2 3 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions) Exhibit A – Subdivisions and Minor Replats 6 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx Existing R O W Exis t i n g R O W9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 11Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Exhibit A – Subdivisions and Minor Replats 7 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx Ex i s t i n g R O W9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 12Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Exhibit A – Subdivisions and Minor Replats 8 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx Tract 8Tract 39.A.1.aPacket Pg. 13Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Exhibit A – Subdivisions and Minor Replats 9 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx Driveway Existing R O W REAR LOT 39.A.1.aPacket Pg. 14Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Exhibit A – Subdivisions and Minor Replats 10 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx Driveway Existing ROWREAR LOT 39.A.1.aPacket Pg. 15Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Exhibit A – Subdivisions and Minor Replats 11 J:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions (PL20210001560)\Drafts\4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC.docx FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY: LDC section 1.08.02 Definitions. Tract: An area of land, public or private, occupied or intended to be occupied, by or for a lawful purpose, including a street, crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission line, oil or gas pipeline, storm drainageway, water main, sanitary or storm sewer main, canal, landscape buffer, or for similar use. The term "tract," when used for land platting purposes, means an area separate and distinct from platted lots or parcels and not included within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. Unless otherwise expressly stated, the dedication of a tract on a plat reflects an intention of the dedicator(s) to dedicate such tract as a fee simple interest in land, subject to any easement(s) stated on the plat or otherwise of record. Right-of-way (ROW): Land in which the state, a county, or a municipality owns the fee simple title or has an easement dedicated or required for a transportation or utility use. Subdivision: The division of land, whether improved or unimproved, into 3 or more contiguous lots, parcels, tracts, tiers, blocks, sites, units, or any other division of land any of which do not equal or exceed 10 acres, for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or development; or any division of land if the extension of an existing street or the establishment of a new street is involved to provide access to the land. The term includes resubdivision, the division of land into 3 or more horizontal condominium parcels or horizontal cooperative parcels, and the division or development of residential or nonresidential zoned land, whether by deed, metes and bounds description, devise, intestacy, map, plat, horizontal condominium parcels, horizontal cooperative parcels, or other recorded instrument, and, when appropriate to the context, means the process of subdividing or to the lands or areas subdivided. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 4.03.06 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions 02-03-2022 CCPC (21266 : PL20210001560 Golden Gate Estates Lot Divisions) 04/07/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Residential Single-Family- 1 (RSF-1) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as Palisades RPUD to allow construction of up to 36 detached single-family dwelling units, on property located on the west side of Yarberry Lane, south of Orange Blossom Drive and west of Airport-Pulling Road in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25, East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 12± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 04/07/2022 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 03/08/2022 3:33 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/08/2022 3:33 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 03/08/2022 3:46 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 03/09/2022 11:10 AM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 03/10/2022 3:13 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 03/18/2022 9:35 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 03/18/2022 11:54 AM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/07/2022 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 17 PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 1 of 18 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: APRIL 7, 2022 SUBJECT: PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Owner: Applicant: Yarberry Partners, LLC Alexis Crespo, AICP 9921 Interstate Commerce Drive Waldrop Engineering Fort Myers, FL 33913 1514 Broadway, Suite 201 Fort Myers, FL 33901 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Residential Single-family-1 (RSF-1) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project known as the Palisades RPUD to allow construction of up to 36 detached residential single-family dwelling units on the subject property. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consisting of 12± acres is located south side of Orange Blossom Drive on the west side of Yarberry Lane in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 2 of 18 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 19Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 3 of 18 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 20Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 4 of 18 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 21Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 5 of 18 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 22Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 6 of 18 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject 12.0± acre property located on the west side of Yarberry Lane is currently zoned Residential Single-family (RSF-1) (Residential Single-family at a density of one dwelling unit per acre) and is located within Special Treatment Wellfield Zones ST/W-3 and ST/W-4. The petitioner proposes to rezone the property to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) with a maximum of 36 single-family dwelling units at a density of 3 dwelling units per acre. (See Attachment A - Proposed PUD Ordinance.) The petitioner seeks four deviations related to wall height, dead-end streets, right-of-way width, and sidewalks. For further information, please see the Deviation Discussion section of this Staff Report. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: A church with a zoning designation of Residential Single Family-1 (RSF-1) East: Yarberry Lane, a two-lane road, and then vacant and developed single-family residences with a zoning designation of Residential Single Family-1 (RSF-1) South: Developed multi-family residences with a zoning designation of Keystone Place PUD and a density of 12 units per acre West: Developed single-family homes with a zoning designation of Sleepy Hollow PUD and a density of 1.69 units per acre 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 7 of 18 AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Rezone and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s September 2, 2021 (revised) Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2020 and the 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: Subject Site 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 8 of 18 “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five-year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition there are 36 single-family residential units proposed which will generate a projected total of +/- 38 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segment of County Barn Road. Staff notes that the development is located within the Northwest Traffic Congestion Management Area (TCMA) which currently has 97.2 percent of the area lane miles meeting required standards. Additionally, the development will impact the adjacent roadway a maximum of 0.64%, which is a de minimus impact, therefore TCMA is not applicable. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links using the 2020 and 2021 AUIRs: Roadway/ Link Link 2020 AUIR LOS 2021 AUIR LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected P.M Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic (1) 2020 Remaining Capacity 2021 Remaining Capacity Airport Pulling Road/2.1 Vander- bilt Beach to Orange Blossom D C 3,000/North 7/SB 627 857 Airport Pulling Road/2.2 Orange Blossom to Pine Ridge D C 3,000/North 8/NB 718 865 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 9 of 18 Goodlette Frank Road/24.1 Vander- bilt Beach to Orange Blossom C C 2,400/North 4/SB 837 1,037 Goodlette Frank Road/24.2 Orange Blossom to Pine Ridge C C 2,400/North 4/NB 742 902 Orange Blossom Drive/ 142.0 (2) Goodlette Frank to Airport Pulling B B 1,320/West 8/WB 884 804 Orange Blossom Drive/ 143.0 Airport Pulling to Livingston B C 1,000/West 1/WB 517 437 1. Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is September 2, 2021; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. 2. Segment designated as “Constrained”. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, the 2020 and 2021 AUIRs, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 0.18 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.03 (15%) acres of preservation will be provided through an off-site mitigation payment. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the Collier County Planning Commission’s (CCPC) recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning and Land Development Review.” In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUDZ petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD preserve requirement is 0.03 acres (15% of 0.18 acres), which 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 10 of 18 meets the minimum preservation requirement. The preservation will be met by a monetary donation, utilizing the off-site mitigation alternative in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.f.vi. The property is in Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) and must address groundwater protection in accordance with LDC Section 3.06.12. No listed animal species were observed on the property. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Landscape Review: Landscape Review staff has reviewed this petition for compliance with the LDC and recommends approval of this project. School Board Review: At this time, there is existing or planned capacity within the next five years for the proposed development at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. At the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) or Plans and Plat (PPL), the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the development is located within or in adjacent concurrency service areas. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the north wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Water service is readily available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way, wastewater service will be available via infrastructure to be extended by the Developer to the project boundary, and sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Zoning and Land Development Review: As previously stated, this PUD Rezone petition will allow for 36 single-family dwelling units. The ingress/egress will be from Yarberry Lane. The proposed PUD will provide adequate buffering with existing neighbors. A 15-foot-wide Type B Landscape Buffer (trees 25 feet on center and a 6-foot-high hedge or wall) screens the proposed residential development from the church property to the north and the residential properties to the south and west. Along Yarberry Lane, a Type D Landscape Buffer (trees 30 feet on center) will buffer the proposed development from the road. The Master Plan provided on page 3 of this Staff Report depicts the areas of proposed residential development, roads, lakes, and landscape buffers. The proposed building height of 35 feet and actual height of 40 feet are compatible with the adjacent permissible zoned building heights of 35 feet and 3-stories. The required 60% open space (7.2 acres) will be provided. Therefore, staff finds the proposed PUDR compatible with the surrounding land uses. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 11 of 18 REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies and future land use map, and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood’s existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential single-family, multi-family, and a church. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn, as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The growth and development trends, changing market conditions, specifically the development of the site with residences, and the development of the surrounding area, support the proposed PUD. This site is located within an area of development with residential and church uses. The proposed PUD rezoning is appropriate, as limited in the PUD Document and the PUD Master Plan based on its compatibility with adjacent land uses. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 12 of 18 The proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with the County’s land-use policies upon adoption that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD Rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. As previously stated, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Rezone will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD Rezone will not adversely impact property values. However, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties around the proposed Palisades RPUD are developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the SDP approval process and PPL process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed PUD Rezone does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 13 of 18 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designation. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Rezone is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County. The petitioner has provided adequate commitments in PUD Exhibit F to mitigate traffic impacts. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utility facility adequacy. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria:” 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 14 of 18 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water distribution mains are readily available along Yarberry Lane, at either corner of the project frontage, and a wastewater force main is readily available at the northeast corner of Yarberry Lane and Il Regalo Circle, approximately 860 feet to the north, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed PUD. The subject site is surrounded by a church to the north, Yarberry Lane and single-family residences to the east, an apartment complex to the south, and a single-family residential development to the west. The adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate th e proposed development. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain PPL approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. Staff has concluded that this PUD Rezone will not change the project’s compatibility, both internally and externally. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum 60% requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 15 of 18 As previously stated, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. The CCWSD has sufficient treatment capacities for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacities must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is seeking four deviations related to street width, on-premise signs, wall height, architectural standards, and parking. Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the Staff Report below for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking six deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are directly extracted from PUD Exhibit F. The petitioner’s rationale, and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Deviation #1 Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary Petitioner’s Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation: The proposed wall height will mitigate the noise impact and appropriately screen the site from the surrounding residential and non-residential development. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed uses, utility sites, and adjacent roadways while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 16 of 18 required perimeter plantings on the exterior side per the LDC. The design will serve t o enhance public health, safety, and welfare. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #2 “Deviation 2 seeks from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which prohibits dead-end streets without cul-de-sacs, to allow for a hammerhead stub design. Petitioner’s Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation: The Applicant is requesting a hammerhead stub at the end of one private internal street as shown on the PUD master plan in order to efficiently utilize the property’s developable area. The maximum length of the proposed dead-end streets will not exceed 150 feet. The proposed design is in compliance with state and local fire safety standards. Therefore, the requested deviation will not negatively impact public health, safety, or welfare and will provide for design flexibility within this infill development parcel. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #3 “Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N which establishes the minimum right- of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 50-foot right-of-way internal private right- of-way. Petitioner’s Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation: The reduced roadway width will provide for traffic calming and increased lot sizes while accommodating standard 10’ wide travel lanes and appropriate infrastructure for this relatively small residential project. The community will be developed with a maximum of 36 homes, thus larger roadways to accommodate high traffic volumes and higher design speeds are not necessary. The additional land area gained by the right-of-way reduction will allow for more expansive green areas/yard space. The demand for larger yards and pool decks to maximize “outdoor living” is a continuing industry standard that the developer is seeking to accommodate in this small, infill community. Studies have determined that 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 17 of 18 reduced right-of-way widths act as a traffic calming feature and will assist in maintaining public health, safety, and welfare within the community. Please also refer to the enclosed right-of-way cross-section on Sheet 2 of the PUD master plan, which demonstrates how the infrastructure can fit within the proposed width. The right-of-way will be privately maintained by the future Homeowners Association (HOA). Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #4 “Deviation 4 from LDC Section 6.06.02.A., “Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements”, which requires five-foot-wide sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of the local/internal rights- of-way, to allow a 6-foot-wide side sidewalk on one side of the right-of-way. Petitioner’s Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation: The proposed sidewalk will be located on the west side of the internal rights-of-way to provide appropriate pedestrian circulation within this small, infill community. The requirements in Section 6.06.02.A.2 allow for a sidewalk on one side of roadways where 15 or fewer dwelling units front a right-of-way that terminates in a cul-de-sac, per below footnote: “For development projects seeking approval of a final subdivision plat or site development plan of 4 or fewer dwelling units per gross acre and where 15 or fewer dwelling units front on a ROW that terminates in a cul-de-sac, then sidewalks will only be required on one side of the ROW and not around the circumference of the cul-de-sac.” A maximum of 16 units front on each roadway terminating in a cul-de-sac, thus the request is very close to the allowable threshold for this deviation by right. Therefore, the deviation is generally consistent with the intent of the code to allow for reduced pedestrian infrastructure on cul de sacs serving few units. A cross-section is provided on Sheet 2 of the PUD master plan. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUDR-PL20210000979, PALISADES RPUD March 4, 2022 Page 18 of 18 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on October 12, 2021, at North Collier Regional Park, located at 15000 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately three members of the public participated: two in person and one via zoom along with the Agent’s team, Applicant, and County staff. For further information, see Attachment B-NIM Summary. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on March 3, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDR- PL20210000979, Palisades RPUD to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B-NIM Summary Attachment C-Application 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Staff Report 3-4-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Last Revised: February 3, 2022 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT “A” LIST OF PERMITTED USES Palisades RPUD Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the first subdivision plat (PPL). Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 36 dwelling units (3 du/acre) shall be permitted in this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. RESIDENTIAL TRACTS A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family detached dwelling units. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, or Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses , including but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and utility buildings. 2. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 3. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 4. Water management facilities. 5. Walls, berms and signs. 6. Passive open space uses and structures, including, but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos, park benches, and walking trails. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, or Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Last Revised: February 3, 2022 Page 2 of 10 EXHIBIT “B” DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Palisades RPUD The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the subdivision plat (PPL). Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project’s entrance are permitted and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians, and cannot exceed 35 feet in actual height. PERMITTED USES AND STANDARDS Single-Family Detached Min. Lot Area 4,500 sq. ft. Min. Lot Width 45’ Min. Lot Depth 100’ Front Yard(1) 15’(2)(3) Side Yard(5) 5’ Rear Yard (Principal)(4) Rear Yard (Accessory) (4) 10’ 5’ Min. Distance Between Principal Structures 10’ Maximum Height Actual Zoned Height 40’ 35’ (1) Front setback is measured from the property line or road easement. (2) Front-loading/front-entry garages shall be setback a minimum of 23’ from the back of sidewalk. Units with side-loaded garages shall have a minimum 10' setback from the front property line/right-of-way. No structures will overhang into the utility easement. (3) Corner lots shall provide one (1) front yard setback within the yard that contains the driveway/vehicular access to the dwelling unit. The secondary front yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the dwelling unit shall provide a minimum 10-foot setback measured from the right-of-way, and will have no overhang into the utility easement if there are any buildings adjacent to that side setback. (4) 0’ principal and accessory setbacks are permitted from lake maintenance easements and landscape buffer easements, which will be separate platted tracts on the PPL. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Homeowners’ association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Last Revised: February 3, 2022 Page 3 of 10 Landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of subdivision plat approval, or shown as separate tracts on the SDP. Note: Nothing in this PUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 41Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 42Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 43Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Last Revised: February 3, 2022 Page 7 of 10 EXHIBIT “D” LEGAL DESCRIPTION Palisades RPUD PARCEL 1 STRAP #00237280004 THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES. AND PARCEL 2 STRAP #00238280003 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF. AND PARCEL 3 STRAP #00237040008 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND PARCEL 4 STRAP #00237080000 THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES. AND PARCEL 5 STRAP #00237000006 THE SOUTH HALF (S 1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSE. LESS OUT 1 THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES. LESS OUT 2 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Last Revised: February 3, 2022 Page 8 of 10 THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 275 FEET OF THE SOUTH 133 FEET TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 161 OF THE EAST 436 FEET OF THE SOUTH 188 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF (N1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND PARCEL 6 STRAP #00238447008 THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 275 FEET OF THE SOUTH 133 FEET TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 161 OF THE EAST 436 FEET OF THE SOUTH 188 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF (N1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Last Revised: February 3, 2022 Page 9 of 10 EXHIBIT “E” LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Palisades RPUD Deviation 1 from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, “Fences and walls”, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential components of Planned Unit Development zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. Deviation 2 from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, “Dead -end streets”, which prohibits dead-end streets without cul-de-sacs, to allow for a hammerhead stub design as shown on the PUD master plan. Deviation 3 from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, “Minimum right-of-way widths”, which establishes the minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 50-foot right-of-way internal private right-of-way. Deviation 4: A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02.A,. “Sidewalks, Bike Lanes and Pathway Requirements”, which requires five-foot wide sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of the local/internal rights-of-way, to allow a 6-foot-wide side sidewalk on one side of the right-of-way. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Last Revised: February 3, 2022 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT “F” DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS Palisades RPUD 1. GENERAL A. One entity (Yarberry Partners, LLC) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Yarberry Partners, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. TRANSPORTATION A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 38 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval B. The owner, its successors or assigns, shall contribute its fair share of the future intersection improvements at Orange Blossom Drive and Airport-Pulling Road within 90 days after written request by the County. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The subject site contained approximately 0.18 acres of native vegetation, of which 15% (0.03 acres) is required to be preserved. No native vegetation is provided for on-site. Off- site mitigation is to be provided through the monetary payment alternative according to LDC Sec. 3.05.07. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Attachment A-Ordinance 2-9-2022 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Page 1 of 2 Memorandum To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Collier County Zoning Division From: Alexis Crespo, Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Date: October 12, 2021 Subject: Palisades RPUD (PL20210000979) Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Yarberry Partners, LLC conducted a neighborhood informational meeting (NIM) for the Palisades Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) rezone. The meeting was held on Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. at the North Collier Regional Park - 15000 Livingston Rd. Naples, FL 34109. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A” and demonstrate approximately 4 attendees came to the meeting, including Collier County Staff. Additionally, one (1) attendee participated via Zoom. A copy of the legal notice, affidavit of publication, a copy of the letter sent to surrounding property owners, and a list of the surrounding property owners are attached as Exhibit “D”. Alexis Crespo started the meeting by introducing the project team from Yarberry Partners, LLC and Waldrop Engineering. She provided a PowerPoint presentation, attached as Exhibit “B,” on the Palisades Place development and the proposed RPUD standards. A handout summarizing the changes was distributed as Exhibit “C”. Following the presentation questions were asked by attendees and responses were provided as outlined below. Public Comment Summary: 1. Can you explain the preserve requirement? RESPONSE: Based on the existing native preserve on-site, the required amount of retained preserve is 0.02 acres. Instead of providing a nominal amount of preserve on-site, we will mitigate off-site by providing a payment to the County. 2. Can you explain the property acreage? How did you manage to fit 36 homes. RESPONSE: It is the fire station acreage plus the additional single-family homes south of the church. 3. Explain how close the homes will be to the property line? RESPONSE: Including the buffers and setbacks, the homes will be a minimum of 20 feet from the PUD boundary/Mill Run property line. 4. Where will the buffer be planted? Will there be a berm? RESPONSE: We are committed to screening between the communities. Plantings will be placed in a buffer easement, and some will be planted on a berm. 5. Why is the stormwater lake located on Yarberry Lane and not adjacent to Mill Run? 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Page 2 of 2 RESPONSE: The water will be collected in the on-site lake and will ultimately outfall/flow to Yarberry Lane. There will be a stormwater management permit and a berm protecting water from flowing to Mill Run. We attempted to re-design the site to place the lake on the west side of the site near Mill Run, but due to topography, site conditions and outfall location, we were unable to do so. 6. What is the timing of development? When will you break ground? RESPONSE: The intent is to start construction in 6-8 months and open for sales shortly after that. We have to complete the zoning and also get construction plan approval from Collier County. Once we start site improvements, we will likely construct 1-2 model homes. 7. How do we stay posted on the latest information? RESPONSE: The developer has set up a website with information. Please visit www.seagatedevelopmentgroup.com and access the Palisades webpage. There will be updates shortly. 8. What is the pricing of the units? RESPONSE: This will depend on the market but we anticipate $1.5M and higher. 9. What are the rental restrictions to prevent Air B n B? RESPONSE: The homeowners association documents will restrict the timeframe and frequency of rentals. Typically, no more than 3 times per year, and no less than 30 days. 10. Please explain the 20 feet between the proposed homes and the property line? RESPONSE: The 20 feet is the measurement from the property line to the structure. There will be 10 feet of landscape buffer, then the rear setback for the dwelling unit. There can be a pool cage closer than the 20 feet and we do intend to offer pools. The pool cage could be 15 feet from the property line. 11. What improvements are you proposing to the road (Yarberry Lane)? RESPONSE: We are not proposing to expand the roadway but will have to make improvements to tie into utilities, including connection to a forcemain and water main. 12. Are you contributing to the Orange Blossom Road improvements? RESPONSE: Yes, we will have a zoning condition to require proportionate fair share payment towards future signalization of Orange Blossom/Airport Pulling Road. There were no further comments and the meeting concluded at approximately 5:30 p.m. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 50Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PALISADES NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING –OCTOBER 12, 2021 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 2 ZOOM TUTORIAL SLIDE 2 Welcome to our HYBRID ZOOM Neighborhood Meeting! Please keep your speaker on MUTE during our brief presentation Following the presentation we will open the meeting for Q&A Please type in questions using the “Chat” Tool –we will read these aloud and respond Please use the “raise hand” tool to indicate desire to speak after we go through written questions 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 3 ZOOM TUTORIAL SLIDE 3 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 4 ZOOM TUTORIAL SLIDE 4 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 5SLIDE 5 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 6SLIDE 6 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 7 PROPERTY OVERVIEW SLIDE 7 12+/-acres Accessed from Yarberry Lane, South of Orange Blossom Road Currently Vacant and Single-Family Residential Formerly owned by North Collier County Fire Control & Rescue District Additional single-family parcels also acquired south of the church 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 8 INTRODUCTION TO SEAGATE SLIDE 8 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 9 INTRODUCTION TO SEAGATE SLIDE 9 Successful world class communities across Southwest Florida Locally owned and operated Commitment to creating quality neighborhoods with strong sense of place and community Active Residential Projects: Windward Isle -Naples Quail West -Naples Hill Tide Estates –Boca Grande Esplanade Lake Club -Estero Isola Bella @ Talis Park -Naples 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades Windward Isle 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 15 Rezoning Request SLIDE 15 Rezone from Collier County RSF-1 to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district. The Property is designated within the Urban Mixed Use- Urban Residential future land use category per the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Maximum attainable density of 48 residential units Seeking approval for 36 single-family dwelling units 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 16 Illustrative Master Concept Plan SLIDE 16 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 17 PUD Rezone Summary SLIDE 17 36 single-family dwelling units Sole access from Yarberry Lane Optional 6-8’ tall perimeter walls/fencing On-site stormwater management lake 0.02 acres of required preserve mitigated off-site per Collier County program 15’ wide landscape buffers along north, south and east property lines 10’ wide landscape buffer to the east Seeking deviations for additional wall height, 50’ wide streets & cul de sac design 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 18 COUNTY PROCESS SLIDE 18 Planned Development Rezone •Site-Specific Concept Plan, Types of Homes & Development Standards (Setbacks, Buffers & Building Height) Local Construction Plan Approval, State & Federal Permits •Detailed Site Plan, Allows for actual construction activities to commence 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 19 NEXT STEPS… SLIDE 19 Conducted Voluntary Pre-Submittal Neighborhood Information Meeting Filed Planned Development Rezone Application Undergoing review by County Planning Staff Conduct Required Neighborhood Information Meeting •Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation •Approval by Board of County Commissioners •File Development Order Application & Apply for Permits 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 20 STAY INVOLVED & INFORMED SLIDE 20 Kbrown@seagatedevelopmentgroup.com Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com (239) 405-7777 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 21 COMMUNITY INPUT SLIDE 21 1) Responses to “Chat” Questions 2) Additional Q & A using the “Raise Hand” tool 3) Email/Call with additional input 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades SLIDE 22 THANK YOU! QUESTIONS 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades PALISADES RPUD PL20210000979 Neighborhood Information Meeting October 12, 2021 5:00 p.m. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Project Size: 12+/- Acres Future Land Use: Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict Current Zoning: Residential Single-Family (RSF-1) Proposed Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Maximum Allowable Density: 48 dwelling units Proposed Density/Intensity/Uses: 36 single-family detached dwelling units 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 24 Proposed Zoning Map SLIDE 24 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) September 24, 2021 RE: Palisades RPUD PL20210000979 (PUD Rezone) Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Yarberry Partners, LLC (“Applicant”) has filed an application with Collier County. The application is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUD Rezone). The Palisades RPUD (“Project”) is located on 12+/- acres of land and is generally located south of Orange Blossom Drive on the west side of Yarberry Lane. The Applicant is requesting approval to develop 36 single-family dwelling units in the Project. No amendment to the comprehensive plan is necessary to accomplish the development program. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 12 at 5:00 p.m. at North Collier Regional Park located on 15000 Livingston Road, Naples, FL 34109. Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on “Join A Meeting” in the top right corner, and enter Meeting ID: 899 1618 1717 Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 850-8525, or alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Alexis Crespo, AICP Senior Vice President - Planning 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) GATCHELL, DAVID D & JULIE N 1011 W 103 STREET KANSAS CITY, MO 64114 COMM ASSOC FOR STONEGATE AND 1044 CASTELLO DR NAPLES, FL 34103 KRISTOPHERS FUTURE LLC 106 FERRY STREET NEWARK, NJ 07105 PETRESCU, ANTONELA & SILVIU 111 OAK PARK DRIVE WATERLOO, ON N2K 0 CANADA FREUND, JAREK MARIAN 1204 RIDGE ST NAPLES, FL 34103 FLORINE P BERNARD REV TRUST 1219 HAMPTON RDG BEDFORD, VA 24523 NJM PROPERTIES LLC 12304 SW 109TH CT MIAMI, FL 33176 FIELDS, ANTHONY J 1279 5TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34102 360 PROPERTIES LLC 12920 METRO PARKWAY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 HAKAIM, TOM S 1405 E 28TH ST LORAIN, OH 44055 REBLE, LINDA 1585 25TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117 FENG, KE 16109 PARQUE LANE NAPLES, FL 34110 JOHNSON TR, JACK V & GINA 16460 W KINGSTON CT PRAIRIE VIEW, IL 60069 TULLY, MARILYN 1680 MULLET CT NAPLES, FL 34102 LYNN TR, LOIS 1730 W BELFAST ST MESA, AZ 85201 PACIFICA ARBOUR WALK LLC 1775 HANCOCK STREET STE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110 CALIJONE, STEPHEN 18 TAM O SHANTER DRIVE MAHWAH, NJ 07430 PAGAN-ORTIZ, JOSE E 1846 N MELBORN DEARBORN, MI 48128 DOUGHERTY, CHARLES & PATRICIA 188 S BENJAMIN DR WEST CHESTER, PA 19382 NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34109 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment B-NIM Summary (10-26-21) (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PALISADES RPUD PL20210000979 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) APPLICATION FORM 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): _________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: ___________ Telephone: _______________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ____________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _______________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)Yarberry Partners, LLC 9921 Interstate Commerce Drive Fort Myers FL 33913 (239)-738-7900 kbrown@seagatedevelopmentgroup.com Alexis Crespo, AICP RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture 28100 Bonita Grande Drive Bonita Springs FL 34135 (239) 405-7777 alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: •If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; •The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and •The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)RSF-1 RPUD Vacant, Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential N/A N/A 2 49 25 N/A N/A See Attached 12 Acres 6633-6735 Yarberry Lane South of Orange Blossom Drive and West of Airport-Pulling Road 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)RSF-1 House of Worship (Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall) PUD Multi-family Residential (Oasis Naples) RSF-1 Single-Family Residential PUD, RPUD Single-Family Residential (Mill Run) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Community Association of Mill Run 1906 Fairfax Circle Naples FL 34109 Cay Lagoon Condominium Association 2120 Cay Lagoon Drive Naples FL 34109 Il Regalo Homeowners Association 6913 Il Regalo Circle Naples FL 34109 The Oasis at Naples Condominium Association 2110 Arbour Walk Circle Naples FL 34109 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a.The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b.Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at pu blic expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c.Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d.The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which c onditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e.The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f.The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g.The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h.Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to asce rtain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 1 of 4 PALISADES RPUD EVALUATION CRITERIA PUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION 10.02.13.B) REVISED SEPTEMBER 2021 a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Palisades RPUD (“Property”) is located in an area of existing and planned urban development within the County’s Urban-designated area. The Property is an infill development ideally located within the Urban Mixed Use-Urban Residential future land use category. As outlined in the PUD Rezone application, the Applicant is proposing a site- specific Palisades Residential Planned Unit Development to accommodate the proposed development program and density. The subject property is located in an urbanized portion of the County as evidenced by the property’s proximity to Airport-Pulling Road, a six-lane arterial roadway, and Orange Blossom Drive. The Property is also proximate to existing and approved urban levels of development, as well as major public facilities including schools, hospitals, and libraries. The Property is northwest and southwest of designated Mixed-Use Activity Centers, which is specifically intended for concentrated commercial and mixed-use development due to access to the arterial roadway network and available public services. Activity Center #11 encompasses 110.74+/- acres at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport- Pulling Road and includes an intensive mix of commercial and community facility uses. Activity Center #13 is composed of 287.18+/- acres with a diverse mix of commercial and residential uses. The Sleepy Hollow 189.13+/- acre PUD to the west of the Property is approved for single- family dwelling units with a maximum of 320 units (1.69 du/acre) per Ordinance 88-25. The 34-acre Arbor Walk (AKA Keystone Place) PUD to the south of the Property allows for a maximum of 406 residential dwelling units (11.94 du/acre) per Ordinance 87-72. In terms of traffic, the subject property will be accessed via Yarberry Lane which connects to Orange Blossom Drive, as depicted on the RPUD Master Plan in the PUD document. As outlined in the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by TR Transportation Collier Boulevard is shown to have adequate capacity under the projected traffic conditions to serve the project. The Property is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s (CCWSD) service area and water and wastewater service are readily available via existing facilities. A statement of availability from the Collier County Public Utilities Departments is enclosed as part of this application. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 2 of 4 Based upon the nature of surrounding uses, the established development pattern at the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Airport-Pulling Road intersection, and the existing levels of public infrastructure to service the proposed RPUD, the Property is suitable for the development of a residential community as proposed through this application. Moreover, the density proposed by the project will ensure the existing land area within the County’s Urban- designated is not underutilized from a public infrastructure standpoint, thereby upholding sound planning principles, as outlined in the companion GMP Amendment. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not toe be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The subject property is under Unified Control by Yarberry Partners, LLC, who has filed this application, as demonstrated by the Covenant of Unified Control included in the PUDZ application. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy or other provision.) FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. The proposed RPUD community will be compatible and complementary to the surrounding area with a common theme for architecture and landscaping while providing a similar type of housing to surrounding PUD’s. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The RPUD will be accessed via Yarberry Lane, a two-lane local road connecting Orange Blossom Drive and Arbour Walk Circle. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The RPUD development pattern will have an insignificant impact on nearby collector and arterial roads. Due to the size of the site and the proposed layout of the project, looping will not be possible. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 3 of 4 Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The RPUD will provide for a potential interconnection to the east if future development of that property warrants such interconnection. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The RPUD proposes 5’ sidewalks on either side of the street and between units. These sidewalks provide residents with walkability within the project. A range of housing types and prices will be offered to allow for a wide variety of income levels the opportunity for housing. CONSERVATION COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 6.1.1: For the County’s Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural- Industrial District and Rural-Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. The RPUD proposes to preserve the required 0.02 acres of native vegetation identified in the Environmental Report through the off-site mitigation monetary payment alternative allowed by the Land Development Code. The very minimal areas of native vegetation on the property are not contiguous to off-site preserve or high quality. Thus, the payment-in- lieu option will provide the greatest benefit to the County. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The protected species survey provided in the Environmental Report reveals no known protected species on the property or immediately adjacent to the property boundary. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The RPUD proposes single-family residential uses as described in this application. The proposed residential units uses ware compatible with the surrounding single-family PUDs in the Orange Blossom Drive area. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 4 of 4 These uses are compatible with the single-family community to the west and the multi- family community to the south. The proposed design standards, setbacks, and building height limitations ensure the proposed development will be conisstent with the surrounding development pattern. The proposed perimeter buffers will also provide for compatibilty between adjacent uses. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD will provide 60% on-site open space in accordance with LDC requirements. Open space will be satisfied via the lakes buffers, and other areas of pervious open space placed throughout the development. Native preservation is not required due to the lack of native vegetation found on the Property. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. As outlined in the enclosed application, all required public infrastructure is available and adequate to service the proposed RPUD. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The Property can accommodate the 36 dwelling units, as shown on the attached RPUD Master Plan, and represents a compact infill project in the rapidly growing area between Airport-Pulling Road and Goodlette-Frank Road. The application demonstrates there is available public infrastructure to support the development as proposed. The project is within the Urban designated portion of the County per the Future Land Use Map. Therefore, the project represents a logical expansion of the existing development pattern to accommodate future growth within Collier County with the urban-designated area. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed development is generally consistent with the PUD regulations contained in the LDC and a determination can be made that the subject development proposes to a degree or at least equivalent to a literal application of such regulations. The Applicant is requesting deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC) in order to support the infill development project. Development of the property in accordance with these deviations will uphold the intent of the RPUD regulations and ensure design consistency, internal connectivity and integration of dwelling types, appropriate vehicular circulation, and the protection of public health, safety and welfare. Further explanation and justification of the deviations are provided in Exhibit “E”. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an applicati on “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)N/A 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e.Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)Yarberry Partners, LLC 9921 Interstate Commerce Drive Fort Myers FL 33913 (239)-738-7900 kbrown@seagatedevelopmentgroup.com 6633-6735 Yarberry Lane Naples FL 34109 2 49 25 N/A See Legal Description in PUD Document See List of Property ID Numbers X Collier County Public Utilities X Collier County Public Utilities 65 people (36 units x 1.8 persons per unit = 64.8) 9,750 GPD 6,107 GPD 2nd Quarter, 2022 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)NA So Noted 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)X 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)Alexis Crespo November 1, 2021 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) COVER LETTER/PROJECT NARRATIVE 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades - PUDZ-PL20210000979 Cover Letter – Request Narrative Page 1 of 5 July 22, 2021 REVISED October 26, 2021 Ms. Nancy Gundlach, RLA Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Palisades RPUD PUD Amendment (PUDZ-PL20210000979) Dear Ms. Gundlach: Enclosed for your review is the Application for PUD Rezoning for a property generally located south of Orange Blossom Drive on the west side of Yarberry Lane in unincorporated Collier County. The subject property is approximately 12 +/- acres in size. The property is designated as Urban Residential Fringe for future land use and is zoned Residential Single Family (RSF-1). EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT The property is partially developed and vacant. It is composed of six (6) parcels, four of which are vacant. The northern two (2) parcels contain single-family residences. Access to the property is gained by Yarberry Lane, a two-lane local roadway. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT The subject property is located in an urbanized portion of the County as evidenced by the property’s proximity to Airport-Pulling Road, a six-lane arterial roadway, and Goodlette-Frank Road. The Property is also proximate to existing and approved urban levels of development, as well as major public facilities including schools, hospitals, and libraries. Please refer to Table 1 below, which provides an inventory of the immediately adjacent Future Land Use Categories, zoning districts, and existing land uses. TABLE 1: INVENTORY OF SURROUNDING LANDS DIRECTION FUTURE LAND USE ZONING DISTRIC T EXISTING LAND USE North Urban Residential Subdistrict RSF-1 Place of Worship (Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witness) South Urban Residential Subdistrict PUD Multi-Family Residential (Keystone Place PUD) East Urban Residential Subdistrict RSF-1 Single-Family Residential West Urban Residential Subdistrict PUD Single-Family Residential (Sleepy Hollow PUD) The Property is northeast of a designated Activity Center, which is specifically intended for concentrated commercial and mixed-use development due to access to the arterial roadway network and available public services. Activity Center #13 encompasses 363 +/- acres at the 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades - PUDZ-PL20210000979 Cover Letter-Request Narrative Page 2 of 5 intersection of Airport-Pulling Road and Pine Ridge Road and includes an intensive mix of approved PUDs and CPUDs, which allow for a diversity of commercial uses. This area will provide many of the requisite goods and services for future residents in close proximity to the property. The 189 +/- acre Sleepy Hollow PUD to the west of the Property is approved for residential dwelling units of single-family homes with a maximum of 320 units (1.69 du/acre) per Ordinance 88-25. The 34 +/- acre Keystone Place PUD to the south of the Property allows for a maximum of 406 residential dwelling units (12 du/acre) per Ordinance 87-72. As outlined below the Applicant is proposing development of 36 single-family detached dwelling units, at an approximate density of 3 du/acre. This density is appropriate considering the below analysis of the Growth Management Plan, as well as the surrounding land use pattern. GMP CONSISTENCY The Palisades RPUD will be fully compliant with the Growth Management Plan. The RPUD will allow for infill development of single-family housing in the Urban Service Area in a manner that protects the residential character of development along Yarberry Lane, which contains a dynamic mix of low density single-family lots, institutional uses, and multi-family development. Specifically, the proposed RPUD is consistent with the following adopted policies: Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. The proposed RPUD community will be compatible and complementary to the surrounding single-family residential area by providing for an extension of single-family development on this infill parcel in a manner that is consistent with the adjacent communities. The project will be compatible with the higher density multi-family to the south via the provision of landscape buffers in compliance with the LDC. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The RPUD will be accessed via Yarberry Lane, a two-lane local road connecting residents to the collector and arterial roadway network via Orange Blossom Drive. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The RPUD development pattern will have an insignificant impact on nearby collector and arterial roads. Due to the size of the site and the proposed layout of the project, looping will not be possible. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades - PUDZ-PL20210000979 Cover Letter-Request Narrative Page 3 of 5 between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Due to the previous development of surrounding neighborhoods, interconnection of the streets from adjoining neighborhoods will not be possible. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The RPUD proposes a 6’ sidewalk on one side of each street. The sidewalks provide residents with walkability within the project. A range of housing types and prices will be offered to allow for a wide variety of income levels the opportunity for housing. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT/JUSTIFICATION The RPUD to permit residential uses in the project directly addresses the County’s identified goals of providing for new development within established urban areas with adequate infrastructure particularly along arterial corridors. The PUD master plan demonstrates residential development tracts accessed via a private internal roadway system. A maximum of 36 single-family detached dwellings are proposed within the project, at a density of 3 du/acre. A 50-foot-wide right-of-way is proposed due to the relatively low traffic volume. As shown on the PUD master plan’s cross section, the right-of-way can accommodate a sidewalk, utilities, and drainage. Due to the project location and the surrounding area, the RPUD will not have connective accesses to areas outside of the project boundary. Within the project boundary, internal pedestrian connectivity will be provided via a 6-foot-wide sidewalk on one side of the right-of- way. Buffers are provided in compliance with the LDC including the 15-foot-wide Type D buffer along Yarberry Lane, 10-foot-wide Type A buffers adjacent to the North and West property lines, and 15-foot-wide Type D buffer along the South property line where the proposed single-family uses will abut existing multi-family development. The perimeter buffers will be supplemented via a 6- 8-foot-tall proposed fence/wall along the property boundaries. Open space will be provided in accordance with the GMP and LDC to uphold the County’s intent for attractive, well-planned and compatible development. No on-site preserve is required per the environmental data report discussed below. The proposed PUD Master Plan and associated development standards for the residential units are consistent with the height and setbacks approved for similar residential projects in the immediate area. ENVIRONMENTAL: As outlined in the Environmental Report prepared by DexBender, the site consists of previously cleared land with mostly exotic vegetation. Per the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), a total of seven vegetative associations and land uses where identified on the property. The dominate habitat type located on the property is Mixed Exotic Upland Forest, with significant amounts of Disturbed Land. There are 0.16 acres of native 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades - PUDZ-PL20210000979 Cover Letter-Request Narrative Page 4 of 5 vegetation (as described by the Collier County Land Development Code Section 3.05.07.A.1) on the property. The report indicates there is a negligible amount of native vegetation present on the. Per the Collier County LDC, the required 15% of native preservation required for this size and type of development would result in only 0.02 acres of preservation. The Applicant is proposing to preserve this amount of native vegetation through off-site mitigation monetary payment per LDC 3.05.07. The listed species survey conducted on the property documented no listed species within the Property. The site contains 0.3 acres of wetland. The Applicant is proposing to mitigate these impacted wetlands by off-site mitigation monetary payment in lieu of on-site preservation, and via permitting in the state agencies. A letter from the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, indicates no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded or likely to be present within the subject property. INFRASTRUCTURE: Accesses to the subject property is proposed to be provided to Yarberry Lane through one full- access connection. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by JMB Transportation, Inc. included an assumption of 36 single-family units only, in order to provide a worst-case scenario, and demonstrates no roadway segments show a significant impact as a result of the development of traffic being added to the roadway network. The subject property is within the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s water and wastewater service areas. Water service is available through an existing 8” water main stub-out to the south end of Yarberry Lane, on the southeast corner of the proposed project, extending from the 8” water main along Arbour Walk Cir. There is a 10” dead-end water main that terminates approximately 230 feet north of the northeast property corner that is available for a loop connection. Potable water is available for domestic use, fire protection, and irrigation, subject to the provisions of LDC 4.03.08 C, the Collier County Irrigation Ordinance (2015-27), and other applicable rules and regulations. Wastewater service is not readily available to the project. The closest District wastewater infrastructure to the project is a 4” force main on the northeast corner of Yarberry Lane & Il Regalo Circle, 1,000 feet to the north of the Subject Property. Extension of the project’s utility facilities to the District’s off-site utility system may be necessary. No such extension shall be any responsibility of the County or the District, fiscally or otherwise (time and schedule). Before service commences, facilities extended to the District’s off-site utility system will be dedicated to and accepted by the District at the developer’s sole expense. The subject property lies within the W-4 Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone. The Applicant is proposing a density of 3 units/acre, a less intensive land use than the adjacent Keystone Place PUD, which has a density of 12 units/acre. The W-4 zone is the least sensitive Wellfield Risk Management zone, and the proposed single-family residential development with a density of 3 units/acre is appropriate for such a zone. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed RPUD rezoning will allow for up to 36 residential units. The single- family housing offered will be compatible with the surrounding area. As outlined in the attached 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades - PUDZ-PL20210000979 Cover Letter-Request Narrative Page 5 of 5 application, the proposed RPUD is consistent with the LDC and the proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 318-6706, or john.cowart@waldropengineering.com Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. John Cowart Project Planner 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PROPERTY DISCLOSURE FORM 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)Yarberry Partners LLC 259 Turnpike Road, Suite 100 Southborough, MA 01772 WIlliam Price, Jr., Manager 50% William Depietri, Manager 50% COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 T49, R25, S02 name not yet approved 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)n See Attached 00237080000, 00237040008, 00238280003, 00237280004, 00237000006 & 00238447008 Palisades COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 07/09/2021 00237080000, 00237040008, 00238280003, 00237280004, 00237000006 & 00238447008 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)n Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 239-405-7777 brandon.hadlock@waldropengineering.com 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) WARRANTY DEEDS 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SUNBIZ CORPORATION INFORMATION 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin Minimum Fee: $500.00 Secretary of the Commonwealth, Corporations Division One Ashburton Place, 17th floor Boston, MA 02108-1512 Telephone: (617) 727-9640 Certificate of Organization (General Laws, Chapter ) Identification Number: 001515066 1. The exact name of the limited liability company is: YARBERRY PARTNERS LLC 2a. Location of its principal office: No. and Street: 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 City or Town: SOUTHBOROUGH State: MA Zip: 01772 Country: USA 2b. Street address of the office in the Commonwealth at which the records will be maintained: No. and Street: 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 City or Town: SOUTHBOROUGH State: MA Zip: 01772 Country: USA 3. The general character of business, and if the limited liability company is organized to render professional service, the service to be rendered: TO ENGAGE IN TEH BUSINESS OF OWNING, MANAGING, OPERATING, INVESTING AND REI NVESTING IN REAL ESTATE AND ENTITIES THAT OWN REAL ESTATE AND TO ENGAGE IN A NY AND ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSARY, ADVISABLE OR INCIDENTAL THERETO AND IN ANY OTHER LAWFUL ACT OR ACTIVITY FOR WHICH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES MAY BE F ORMED UNDER THE ACT. 4. The latest date of dissolution, if specified: 5. Name and address of the Resident Agent: Name: WILLIAM DEPIETRI No. and Street: 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 City or Town: SOUTHBOROUGH State: MA Zip: 01772 Country: USA I, WILLIAM DEPIETRI resident agent of the above limited liability company, consent to my appointment as the resident agent of the above limited liability company pursuant to G. L. Chapter 156C Section 12. 6. The name and business address of each manager, if any: Title Individual Name First, Middle, Last, Suffix Address (no PO Box) Address, City or Town, State, Zip Code MANAGER WILLIAM A DEPIETRI 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772 USA MANAGER WILLIAM G PRICE JR 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772 USA 7. The name and business address of the person(s) in addition to the manager(s), authorized to execute documents to be filed with the Corporations Division, and at least one person shall be named if there are no MA SOC Filing Number: 202159881620 Date: 6/18/2021 3:33:00 PM 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) managers. Title Individual Name First, Middle, Last, Suffix Address (no PO Box) Address, City or Town, State, Zip Code 8. The name and business address of the person(s) authorized to execute, acknowledge, deliver and record any recordable instrument purporting to affect an interest in real property: Title Individual Name First, Middle, Last, Suffix Address (no PO Box) Address, City or Town, State, Zip Code REAL PROPERTY WILLIAM A DEPIETRI 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772 USA REAL PROPERTY WILLIAM G PRICE JR 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772 USA 9. Additional matters: SIGNED UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY, this 18 Day of June, 2021, WILLIAM A DEPIETRI (The certificate must be signed by the person forming the LLC.) © 2001 - 2021 Commonwealth of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS I hereby certify that, upon examination of this document, duly submitted to me, it appears that the provisions of the General Laws relative to corporations have been complied with, and I hereby approve said articles; and the filing fee having been paid, said articles are deemed to have been filed with me on: WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN Secretary of the Commonwealth June 18, 2021 03:33 PM MA SOC Filing Number: 202159881620 Date: 6/18/2021 3:33:00 PM 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) BOUNDARY SURVEY 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 178Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) AERIAL LOCATION MAP 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Aerial Location Map 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS & AVAILABILITY LETTER 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e.Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)Yarberry Partners, LLC 9921 Interstate Commerce Drive Fort Myers FL 33913 (239)-738-7900 kbrown@seagatedevelopmentgroup.com 6633-6735 Yarberry Lane Naples FL 34109 2 49 25 N/A See Legal Description in PUD Document See List of Property ID Numbers X Collier County Public Utilities X Collier County Public Utilities 65 people (36 units x 1.8 persons per unit = 64.8) 9,750 GPD 6,107 GPD 2nd Quarter, 2022 June 15, 2021 VIA: E-MAIL John Cowart John.Cowart@waldropengineering.com Waldrop Engineering 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Subject: Water and Wastewater Service Availability Project: 6735-6635 Yarberry Lane Parcel #: 00237000006, 00238447008, 00237280004, 00237040008, 00238280003, 00237080000 Dear John: The subject project is within the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s (CCWSD) water and wastewater service areas. Water service is readily available to the project via an existing 8” water main stub-out to the south end of Yarberry Lane, on the southeast corner of the proposed project, extending from the 8” water main along Arbour Walk Cir. There is also a 10” dead-end water main that terminates approximately 30 to 35 feet north of the northeast property corner. Potable water is available for domestic use, fire protection, and irrigation, subject to the provisions of LDC 4.03.08 C, the Collier County Irrigation Ordinance (2015-27), and other applicable rules and regulations. Wastewater service is not readily available to the project. Extension of the project’s utility facilities to the District’s off-site utility system may be necessary. No such extension shall be any responsibility of the County or the District, fiscally or otherwise (time and schedule). Before service commences, facilities extended to the District’s off-site utility system must be dedicated to and accepted by the District at the developer’s sole expense. The closest District wastewater infrastructure to the project is a 4” force main on the northeast corner of Yarberry Ln & Il Regalo Cir, approximately 810 feet to the north. If extension of the project’s utility facilities to the District’s off-site utility system is not feasible and provided such is a lawful use at the project site (in accordance with the County’s LDC and all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and relevant written agreements, if any), Interim Service Facilities/Systems may be constructed to service the project until District wastewater service becomes readily available. Any Interim Service Facility/System shall be connected to the District’s off-site utility system upon extension to within two hundred (200) feet of the project boundary and provided adequate capacity to service the entire project. You may obtain authorization for an Interim Service Facility/System by entering into an Interim Facility/System 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Agreement (Form 1). Such agreement must be executed by authorized representatives of the project to be served by the Interim Utility Facility/System, by the District, and by the Board of County Commissioners. Alternatively, provided the requisite utility easements, the developer might obtain wastewater service via the private gravity sewer 140 feet to the southeast of the project, on Arbor Walk Cir. However, this alternative might require conveyance of the downstream portion of the private wastewater collection system owned by The Oasis at Naples Condominium Association, Inc. to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. This option should be vetted with County staff at a pre- submittal conference (see below) before any significant investment of time or money. Connections to the CCWSD’s water distribution and wastewater collection systems will be permitted only after the GMD Development Review Division’s approval of hydraulic calculations prepared by the Developer’s Engineer of Record in accordance with the Design Criteria found in Section 1 of the Collier County Water-Sewer District Utilities Standards Manual. Source pressure assumptions for water distribution system design are prescribed in the Design Criteria. Please contact the Wastewater Engineering Section (WasteWaterEngineering@colliercountyfl.gov) to confirm downstream wastewater collection/transmission system capacity and force main connection pressure, as needed. Adequate capacity for this project is not guaranteed until the project receives a commitment for service. A preliminary utility plan must be reviewed and discussed at a pre-submittal conference with representatives of the Public Utilities Department and the Growth Management Department, as required by Sec. 134-58, paragraph (b)(2) of the Code of Ordinances. This conference may be conducted by email at the discretion of the Public Utilities Department. Please contact Brett Rosenblum (Brett.Rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov) for assistance with this requirement. See the below GIS screen shot and attached record drawings for approximate utility locations. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) If you have any questions, you may contact me at (239) 252-1037 or Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E., Principal Project Manager CC: Steve Messner, Division Director – Water, PUD/WD; Beth Johnssen, Division Director – Wastewater, PUD/WWD; Ben Bullert, Principal Project Manager, PUD/Water; Dan Roman, Principal Project Manager, PUD/WWD; Brett Rosenblum, Principal Project Manager, GMD/DRD; Joanna Nicholson, Site Plans Reviewer, GMD/DRD; Utility Planning Section; Brandon Hadlock <Brandon.Hadlock@waldropengineering.com>; Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com>; Jeremy Frantz <Jeremy.Frantz@waldropengineering.com> 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) GIS Screen Shot 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT & SUPPORTIVE MAPS 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Yarberry Lane Rezoning Environmental Information The Yarberry Lane Parcel is 11. 78 acres in size and the entire site has been cleared in the past. The site contains very little native vegetation. The Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) Code for each of the various vegetation associations on the site are shown on the attached Vegetation Map. The site consists primarily of 5.41 acres of Mixed Exotic Upland Forest (FLUCCS 450) and 4.48 acres of Disturbed Land (FLUCCS 740). There is a 1.56 acre residence and yard (FLUCCS 110) located on the northeast corner of the site. A 0.03 acre ditch (FLUCCS 510D) is located near the center of the site and a 0.12 acre exotic wetland hardwoods area (FLUCCS 619) is located in the northwest corner. There is a 0.02 acre freshwater marsh invaded by exotics 5‐9% (FLUCCS 641E) near the center of the site and a 0.16 acre freshwater marsh invaded by exotics 51‐75% (FLUCCS 641E3) located in the southwest portion of the site. There are 0.18 acres of native vegetation (as described by the Collier County Land Development Code Section 3.05.07.A.1) on the property. The preservation requirement will be met through the off‐site mitigation monetary payment alternative per LDC 3.05.07. Please see the attached Protected Species Assessment for a discussion of current on site conditions. Parke Lewis of DexBender prepared the Protected Species Assessment. Mr. Lewis has been employed as a full time environmental consultant in southwest Florida since 1989. A copy of his credentials is attached. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) YARBERRY LANE PARCEL Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Protected Species Assessment July 2021 Prepared for: Seagate Development Group, LLC 9921 Interstate Commerce Drive Fort Myers, FL 33913 Prepared by: DexBender 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 (239) 334-3680 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 1 INTRODUCTION The 11.78± acre parcel is located within a portion of Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Existing single family residential development surrounds the parcels. Yarberry Lane is to the east. SITE CONDITIONS Based on a review of historic aerial photography, the vast majority of the property had been cleared prior to 1995. Four single family homes were also present on the site at that time. A fifth home was constructed on the northern part of the property by 2008. By 2010 the three southerly homes had been removed. That portion of the property has become dominated by exotic vegetation. VEGETATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS The predominant upland and wetland vegetation associations were mapped in the field on 2021 digital color 1” = 150’ scale aerial photography. The property boundary was obtained from Seagate Development Group. The property boundary was staked in the field at the time of our site inspection. Seven vegetation associations were identified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). Figure 1 depicts the approximate location and configuration of these vegetation associations and Table 1 summarizes the acreages by FLUCCS Code. A brief description of each FLUCCS Code is also provided below. Table 1. Acreage Summary by FLUCCS Code FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 110 Residential 1.56 450 Mixed Exotic Upland Forest 5.41 510D Ditches 0.03 619 Exotic Weland Hardwoods 0.12 *641E Freshwater Marshes Invaded by Exotics (5 –9%) 0.02 *641E3 Freshwater Marshes Invaded by Exotics (51 –75%) 0.16 740 Disturbed Land 4.48 Total 11.78 * Collier County Native Vegetation (LDC 3.05.07.A.1) FLUCCS Code 110, Residential The northern portion of the site currently contains two single family homes. The majority of the vegetation consists of mowed carpet grass (Axonopus sp.), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), pusley (Richardia sp.), and frog fruit (Phyla nodiflora). Scattered live oak (Quercus virginiana), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), and ornamental species are also present. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 3 FLUCCS Code 450, Mixed Exotic Upland Forest The western half of the property has become overgrown by woody exotics consisting primarily of earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), java plum (Syzygium cumini), carrotwood (Cupaniopsis anacardioides), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Additional species present include very widely scattered laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), cabbage palm, slash pine, and saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia). Ground cover is sparce due to the shading of the dense growth of exotics. FLUCCS Code 510D, Ditches A small remnant isolated ditch is present on-site. The ditch is completely overgrown by Brazilian pepper. FLUCCS Code 619, Exotic Wetland Hardwoods A small isolated forested wetland is present in the northwest corner of the property. This wetland is dominated by exotics such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), java plum, and Brazilian pepper. Very widely scattered laurel oak and swamp fern are also present. Based on adventitious rooting on the melaleuca it appears that this area is inundated by one to three inches of water during the summer wet season. FLUCCS Code 641E, Freshwater Marshes Invaded by Exotics (5 – 9%) This small isolated herbaceous wetland is vegetated by primrose willow (Ludwigia sp.), thistle (Cirsium sp.), and wedelia. FLUCCS Code 641E3, Freshwater Marshes Invaded by Exotics (51 – 75%) A second isolated herbaceous wetland is located in the southwest portion of the site within the lowest portion of a 2.72 acres of wetland that was identified on-site in 2007. This area is currently vegetated by water-hyssops (Bacopa monnieri), primrose willow, loosestrife (Lythrum sp.), wedelia, cattail (Typha sp.), and climbing hemp weed (Mikania scandens). FLUCCS Code 740, Disturbed Land This FLUCCS Code was used to identify the southeastern portion of the site where the three homes have been removed. The area is vegetated by a variety of exotics (earleaf acacia, java plum, carrotwood, and Brazilian pepper) as well as native species (mahogany (Swietenia mahagoni), live oak, laurel oak, and cabbage palm) in the canopy and midstory. Many of those tree were likely planted as landscaping associated with the former homes. Additional landscape species present include royal poinciana (Delonix regia) and queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana). Ground cover consists of weedy species such as ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), southern sida (Sida acuta), whitehead broom (Spermacoce verticillata), wedelia, air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), and grape vine (Vitis sp.). SURVEY METHOD Prior to inspecting the site, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) listed species occurrence data base was reviewed to determine the known occurrence of 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 4 species listed by the FWC and/or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) as threatened, endangered, or species of special concern in the project area. A review of the FWC listed species occurrence database indicated that Florida black bear have been recorded in the general vicinity of the property (Figure 2). The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), delisted in 2012, is still protected by the Florida Black Bear Management Plan and is not listed by the FWS. The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) is listed as endangered by the FWS and the FWC. The FWS established a Consultation Area for this species in its October 22, 2019 letter to the COE. The property is located within the Consultation Area (Figure 3). The property is not located within the February 2007 Panther Focus Area identified by the FWS. The Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) is listed as endangered by both the FWS and FWC. The site is also not located within Priority 1 or Priority 2 habitat as defined by the 1993 Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan South Florida Population or as Primary Zone or Secondary Zone on the February 2007 Panther Focus Area Map (Figure 4). The FWC’s online Gopher Tortoise Permit Map was also reviewed. According to that data base there are no known listed species sightings on or immediately adjacent to the subject property. The FWC’s online Gopher Tortoise Permit Map does not contain any records of gopher tortoise permits being issued for the site or for surrounding properties. In addition, per Collier County regulations three species of orchids (Cyrtopodium punctatum, Encyclia cochleata, and E. tampensis) and four species of wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata, T. utriculata, T. balbisiana, and T. flexuosa) which could potentially occur on-site were included in the survey. In order to comply with FWC/FWS survey methodology guidelines, each habitat type was surveyed for the occurrence of the species listed above using meandering pedestrian belt transects. Observations for listed species were made during specific protected species survey events. The approximate location of direct sighting or sign (such as tracks, nests, and droppings) of a listed species, when observed, was denoted on the aerial photography. The 1" = 150’ scale aerial Protected Species Assessment map (Figure 1) depicts the approximate location of the survey transects and the results of the survey. The listed species survey was conducted during the mid-day hours of July 12, 2021. Table 2. Listed Species That Could Potentially Occur On-site FLUCCS CODE Percent Survey Coverage Species Name Present Absent 110 80 None 450 80 None 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Perm it Use Only - N ot For C on st ruct ionProperty b oun dary is ap proximat e.Map b ased o n dat a o bt ain ed fro m th e F lorida Fish an d W ild lifeConservation C omm ission . Yarb err y L an e P a rcel Section: 24Township: 45Range: 24 ³ Fig ure 1. Nui sa nc e Bea r Ca lls Ma p nm nm nm nmnm nm nm nm Sour ce: Esr i, M axa r, G e oEye , Ear t hst ar G e ogr aph ic s, CNE S/Air bus DS , USDA, US GS, Ae roGRID,IG N, a nd t he G IS Us er Com m un it y 7/1 9/2021 8 :5 2:43 AM Y:\SEAG ATE-4\GIS _GPS\Bear M ap.m xd Fort My er s (23 9) 33 4-3680 - 0 0.25 0.50.12 5 Mil e s Le ge nd nm Bla ck Be a r Nu is a nc e C all s Su bje c t P a rc elAirport RoadOrange Blossom Drive Yarberry Lane59.A.2.d Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 195Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 196Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 8 Table 2. Listed Species That Could Potentially Occur On-site (continued) FLUCCS CODE Percent Survey Coverage Species Name Present Absent 110 80 None 450 80 None 510D 80 American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens) Roseate Spoonbill (Ajaia ajaja) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Everglades Mink (Mustela vison evergladensis) √ √ √ √ √ √ 619 80 None 641E 641E3 80 American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Florida Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis) Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens) Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) Everglades Mink (Mustela vison evergladensis) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 740 80 None SURVEY RESULTS No species listed by either the FWS or the FWC were observed on the site during the protected species survey. In addition to the site inspection, a search of the FWC species database revealed no known protected species within or immediately adjacent to the project limits. The project is located within the Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Area. Therefore, the site was surveyed for potential Florida bonneted bat roosts. No trees with cavities or artificial structures were observed on-site. Other Listed Species No other species listed by either the FWS or the FWC were observed on the site during the protected species survey or during other site visits. There is the potential for periodic opportunistic foraging by both listed and non listed species of wading birds within the 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9 littoral zone of the existing wetlands. In addition to the site inspections, a search of the FWC species database revealed no additional known protected species within or immediately adjacent to the project limits. Y:\SEAGATE-4\PSA.docx 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 204Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 209Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 211Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 212Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 215Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 222Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 223Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DocuSign Envelope ID: 10E0D68D-1607-4043-9EA9-EF735E13016E9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 224Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) MASTER SITE FILE LETTER 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph | 850.245.6439 fax | SiteFile@dos.state.fl.us This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at CompliancePermits@dos.MyFlorida.com for project review information. June 15, 2021 John Cowart Project Planner / GIS Analyst john.cowart@waldropengineering.com o (239) 405-7777 | d (239) 908-3421 In response to your request on June 4, 2021, the Florida Master Site File lists no cultural resources recorded at 6633-6735 Yarberry Lane, East of Airport-Pulling Road and South of Vanderbilt Beach Road within Section 2 / Township 49 / Range 25, Collier County, Florida. When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: x This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. x Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. x While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. x Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at CompliancePermits@dos.MyFlorida.com Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Eman M. Vovsi, Ph.D. Florida Master Site File Eman.Vovsi@DOS.MyFlorida.com 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SCHOOL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [√] type of application request (one only): [ ] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. Project Information: Project Name: ___________________________________________ Municipality: _________________________________ Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): _______________________________________________________ Location/Address of subject property: ____________________________________________________ (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: _______________________________________________________________________________ II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________ Agent/Contact Person: ________________________________________________________________________________ (Please note that if agent or contact inform ation is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone#: _____________________________ Fax: _________________________Em ail_________________________ I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________ Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Date _________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Development Information Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Proposed Land Use Designation: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Project Acreage: Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: Total Units Proposed by Type: Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp:___________________________ 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)PALISADES PUDZ COLLIER COUNTY See List of Property ID Numbers 6633-6735 Yarberry Lane Yarberry Lane and Orange Blossom Drive Yarberry Partners, LLC JOHN COWART, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. 1514 BROADWAY, SUITE 210, FORT MYERS, FL 33901 (239)-738-7900 Single-Family; Vacant Single-Family RSF-1 RPUD 12+/- Acres 36 36 4 Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased: Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF MF MH C G Totals by Yr Grand Total Grand Total Insert totals by unit type by years. Unit Types: SF = Single Family MF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile Homes C = Condo/Co-Op G = Government EXAMPLE: Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MH N/A C N/A G N/A Totals by Yr 75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Grand Total 150 . 2 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Se rvice L ayer Cre dits: Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Ea rthstar G eog ra phics, CN ES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroG RID, IG N, an d the GIS U se r Commu nity Yarberry LNMill Run CIRA rbo ur Wa l k C IR ¯ 0 420 840210Feet 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) List of Property ID Numbers Palisades RPUD Page 1 of 1 Palisades RPUD List of Property ID Numbers PROPERTY ID NUMBER 00237000006 00238447008 00237280004 00237040008 00238280003 00237080000 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) DEVIATION & JUSTIFICATIONS 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Deviation Justification Narrative Page 1 of 2 Palisades RPUD LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC REVISED DECEMBER 2021 Deviation 1: Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. JUSTIFICATION: The proposed wall height will mitigate the noise impact and appropriately screen the site from the surrounding residential and non-residential development. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed uses, utility sites, and adjacent roadways, while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by required perimeter plantings on the exterior side per the LDC. The design will serve to enhance public health, safety and welfare. Deviation 2: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which prohibits dead-end streets without cul-de-sacs, to allow for a hammerhead stub design. JUSTIFICATION: The Applicant is requesting a hammerhead stub at the end of one private internal street as shown on the PUD master plan in order to efficiently utilize the property’s developable area. The maximum length of the proposed dead-end streets will not exceed 150 feet. The proposed design is in compliance with state and local fire safety standards. Therefore, the requested deviation will not negatively impact public health, safety or welfare and will provide for design flexibility within this infill development parcel. Deviation 3: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.N which establishes the minimum right-of- way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 50-foot right-of-way internal private right-of- way. JUSTIFICATION: The reduced roadway width will provide for traffic calming and increased lot sizes, while accommodating standard 10’ wide travel lanes and appropriate infrastructure for this relatively small residential project. The community will be developed with a maximum of 36 homes, thus larger roadways to accommodate high traffic volumes and higher design speeds is not necessary. The additional land area gained by the right-of-way reduction will allow for more expansive green areas/yard space. The demand for larger yards and pool decks to maximize “outdoor living” is a continuing industry standard that the developer is seeking to accommodate in this small, infill community. Studies have determined that reduced right-of-way widths act as a traffic calming feature and will assist in maintaining public health, safety, and welfare within the community. Please also refer to the enclosed right-of-way cross section on Sheet 2 of the PUD master plan, which demonstrates how the infrastructure can fit within the proposed width. The right-of-way will be privately maintained by the future Homeowners Association (HOA). 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Schedule of Deviations Page 2 of 2 Deviation 4: A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02.A,. “Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements”, which requires five-foot wide sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of the local/internal rights-of-way, to allow a 6-foot-wide side sidewalk on one side of the right-of-way. JUSTIFICATION: JUSTIFICATION: The proposed sidewalk will be located on the west side of the internal rights-of-way to provide appropriate pedestrian circulation within this small, infill community. The requirements in Section 6.06.02.A.2 allow for a sidewalk on one side of roadways where 15 or fewer dwelling units front a right-of-way that terminates in a cul-de-sac, per below footnote: “For development projects seeking approval of a final subdivision plat or site development plan of 4 or fewer dwelling units per gross acre and where 15 or fewer dwelling units front on a ROW that terminates in a cul- de-sac, then sidewalks will only be required on one side of the ROW and not around the circumference of the cul-de-sac.” A maximum of 16 units front on each roadway terminating in a cul -de-sac, thus the request is very close to the allowable threshold for this deviation by right. Therefore, the deviation is generally consistent with the intent of the code to allow for reduced pedestrian infrastructure on cul de sacs serving few units. A cross section is provided on Sheet 2 of the PUD master plan. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PUD MASTER PLAN 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.) 15' TYPE "B" BUFFER 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER 15' TYPE "B" BUFFER 2 15' TYPE "D" BUFFER 3 OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE ENTRY GATE ARBOUR WALK CIRCLE YARBERRY LANE(2 LANE LOCAL ROAD)RESIDENTIAL TRACT RESIDENTIAL TRACT LAKE MILL RUN CIRCLE RESIDENTIAL TRACT USE: MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: PUD (KEYSTONE PLACE) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RSF-1 FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT USE: CHRUCH ZONING: RSF-1 FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: PUD (SLEEPY HOLLOW) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT 4 3 1 1 1 OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE 1 EXHIBIT C1 of 3 0 SCALE IN FEET 30 60 120WALDROPENGINEERINGCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000205.dwg12/27/2021 4:13:34 PM10/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTSPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-021LEGEND LAKE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS #DEVIATION 212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 15.0' DRAINAGE EASEMENT BUFFER VARIES TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION N.T.S. CONTROL ELEVATION = 9.30 (FT-NAVD) ELEV. VARIES = 13.80 -14.50 NAVD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ELEV. = 15.55 - 17.25 NAVD PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.25 NAVD (25 YR. MIN. BERM ELEV. = 14.00 NAVD) PROPOSED 12" HDPE DRAINAGE OPTIONAL 8' FENCE/WALL 4:1 MA X 3:1 MA X 4:1 MAX LOT LINE 3.0'7.0'5.0' MATCH EXISTING ELEV. = 10.25 NAVD VARIES SILT FENCE EXISTING GRADE 1 50.0' RIGHT OF WAY 2.0'10.0' TRAVEL LANE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 2.0'4.0'5.0' SIDEWALK 4.0' VALLEY GUTTER (TYP) 4.0'5.0' SIDEWALK 4.0' TYPICAL 50' ROW CROSS SECTION N.T.S. 2% MAX 2% MAX2%2% 10.0' PUE 10.0' PUE 3 50.0' RIGHT OF WAY 2.0'10.0' TRAVEL LANE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 2.0'4.0'6.0' SIDEWALK 3.0' VALLEY GUTTER (TYP) SIDEWALK DEVIATION CROSS SECTION N.T.S. 2% MAX2%2% 10.0' PUE 10.0' PUE 4 13.0'EXHIBIT C2 of 3 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000205.dwg12/27/2021 4:13:35 PMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-0210/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT C3 of 3 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com\\flbon\FLBON Projects\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000205.dwg2/3/2022 3:06:28 PMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-02 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. ALL ACREAGES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. 3. THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINED APPROXIMATELY 0.18 ACRES OF NATIVE VEGETATION, OF WHICH 15% (.03 ACRES) IS REQUIRED TO BE PRESERVED. NO NATIVE VEGETATION IS PROVIDED FOR ON-SITE. OFF-SITE MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED PER LDC SEC 3.05.07. 4. THE LOCATION OF THE ONSITE LAKE AND RESIDENTIAL TRACTS IS PRELIMINARY AND MAY BE ADJUSTED AT SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 5. RPUD IS PERMITTED FOR A MAXIMUM OF 36 DWELLING UNITS (3 DU/ACRE) LAND USE SUMMARY RESIDENTIAL 6.1 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY 1.5 AC LAKE 1.7 AC OTHER OPEN SPACE 2.7 AC TOTAL 12.0 +/- AC DEVIATION 1 FROM LDC SECTION 5.03.02.C.2, "FENCES AND WALLS", WHICH PERMITS A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL HEIGHT OF 6 FEET IN RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL/BERM HEIGHT OF 8 FEET ALONG THE PUD PERIMETER BOUNDARY. DEVIATION 2 FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01J, "DEAD-END STREETS", WHICH PROHIBITS DEAD-END STREETS WITHOUT CUL-DE-SACS, TO ALLOW FOR A HAMMERHEAD STUB DESIGN AS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN. DEVIATION 3 FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.N, MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS", WHICH ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET TO BE UTILIZED, TO ALLOW FOR A 50-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERNAL PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY. DEVIATION 4: A DEVIATION FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.02A,. "SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE, AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS", WHICH REQUIRES FIVE-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE LOCAL/INTERNAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY, TO ALLOW A 6-FOOT-WIDE SIDE SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. OPEN SPACE SUMMARY REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 7.2 AC PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 7.2 AC 10/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) NIM SUMMARY 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Page 1 of 2 Memorandum To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Collier County Zoning Division From: Alexis Crespo, Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Date: October 12, 2021 Subject: Palisades RPUD (PL20210000979) Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Yarberry Partners, LLC conducted a neighborhood informational meeting (NIM) for the Palisades Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) rezone. The meeting was held on Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. at the North Collier Regional Park - 15000 Livingston Rd. Naples, FL 34109. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A” and demonstrate approximately 4 attendees came to the meeting, including Collier County Staff. Additionally, one (1) attendee participated via Zoom. A copy of the legal notice, affidavit of publication, a copy of the letter sent to surrounding property owners, and a list of the surrounding property owners are attached as Exhibit “D”. Alexis Crespo started the meeting by introducing the project team from Yarberry Partners, LLC and Waldrop Engineering. She provided a PowerPoint presentation, attached as Exhibit “B,” on the Palisades Place development and the proposed RPUD standards. A handout summarizing the changes was distributed as Exhibit “C”. Following the presentation questions were asked by attendees and responses were provided as outlined below. Public Comment Summary: 1. Can you explain the preserve requirement? RESPONSE: Based on the existing native preserve on-site, the required amount of retained preserve is 0.02 acres. Instead of providing a nominal amount of preserve on-site, we will mitigate off-site by providing a payment to the County. 2. Can you explain the property acreage? How did you manage to fit 36 homes. RESPONSE: It is the fire station acreage plus the additional single-family homes south of the church. 3. Explain how close the homes will be to the property line? RESPONSE: Including the buffers and setbacks, the homes will be a minimum of 20 feet from the PUD boundary/Mill Run property line. 4. Where will the buffer be planted? Will there be a berm? RESPONSE: We are committed to screening between the communities. Plantings will be placed in a buffer easement, and some will be planted on a berm. 5. Why is the stormwater lake located on Yarberry Lane and not adjacent to Mill Run? 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Page 2 of 2 RESPONSE: The water will be collected in the on-site lake and will ultimately outfall/flow to Yarberry Lane. There will be a stormwater management permit and a berm protecting water from flowing to Mill Run. We attempted to re-design the site to place the lake on the west side of the site near Mill Run, but due to topography, site conditions and outfall location, we were unable to do so. 6. What is the timing of development? When will you break ground? RESPONSE: The intent is to start construction in 6-8 months and open for sales shortly after that. We have to complete the zoning and also get construction plan approval from Collier County. Once we start site improvements, we will likely construct 1-2 model homes. 7. How do we stay posted on the latest information? RESPONSE: The developer has set up a website with information. Please visit www.seagatedevelopmentgroup.com and access the Palisades webpage. There will be updates shortly. 8. What is the pricing of the units? RESPONSE: This will depend on the market but we anticipate $1.5M and higher. 9. What are the rental restrictions to prevent Air B n B? RESPONSE: The homeowners association documents will restrict the timeframe and frequency of rentals. Typically, no more than 3 times per year, and no less than 30 days. 10. Please explain the 20 feet between the proposed homes and the property line? RESPONSE: The 20 feet is the measurement from the property line to the structure. There will be 10 feet of landscape buffer, then the rear setback for the dwelling unit. There can be a pool cage closer than the 20 feet and we do intend to offer pools. The pool cage could be 15 feet from the property line. 11. What improvements are you proposing to the road (Yarberry Lane)? RESPONSE: We are not proposing to expand the roadway but will have to make improvements to tie into utilities, including connection to a forcemain and water main. 12. Are you contributing to the Orange Blossom Road improvements? RESPONSE: Yes, we will have a zoning condition to require proportionate fair share payment towards future signalization of Orange Blossom/Airport Pulling Road. There were no further comments and the meeting concluded at approximately 5:30 p.m. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 243Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PALISADES NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING –OCTOBER 12, 2021 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 2 ZOOM TUTORIAL SLIDE 2 Welcome to our HYBRID ZOOM Neighborhood Meeting! Please keep your speaker on MUTE during our brief presentation Following the presentation we will open the meeting for Q&A Please type in questions using the “Chat” Tool –we will read these aloud and respond Please use the “raise hand” tool to indicate desire to speak after we go through written questions 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 3 ZOOM TUTORIAL SLIDE 3 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 4 ZOOM TUTORIAL SLIDE 4 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 5SLIDE 5 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 6SLIDE 6 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 7 PROPERTY OVERVIEW SLIDE 7 12+/-acres Accessed from Yarberry Lane, South of Orange Blossom Road Currently Vacant and Single-Family Residential Formerly owned by North Collier County Fire Control & Rescue District Additional single-family parcels also acquired south of the church 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 8 INTRODUCTION TO SEAGATE SLIDE 8 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 9 INTRODUCTION TO SEAGATE SLIDE 9 Successful world class communities across Southwest Florida Locally owned and operated Commitment to creating quality neighborhoods with strong sense of place and community Active Residential Projects: Windward Isle -Naples Quail West -Naples Hill Tide Estates –Boca Grande Esplanade Lake Club -Estero Isola Bella @ Talis Park -Naples 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) Windward Isle 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 15 Rezoning Request SLIDE 15 Rezone from Collier County RSF-1 to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district. The Property is designated within the Urban Mixed Use- Urban Residential future land use category per the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Maximum attainable density of 48 residential units Seeking approval for 36 single-family dwelling units 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 16 Illustrative Master Concept Plan SLIDE 16 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 17 PUD Rezone Summary SLIDE 17 36 single-family dwelling units Sole access from Yarberry Lane Optional 6-8’ tall perimeter walls/fencing On-site stormwater management lake 0.02 acres of required preserve mitigated off-site per Collier County program 15’ wide landscape buffers along north, south and east property lines 10’ wide landscape buffer to the east Seeking deviations for additional wall height, 50’ wide streets & cul de sac design 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 18 COUNTY PROCESS SLIDE 18 Planned Development Rezone •Site-Specific Concept Plan, Types of Homes & Development Standards (Setbacks, Buffers & Building Height) Local Construction Plan Approval, State & Federal Permits •Detailed Site Plan, Allows for actual construction activities to commence 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 19 NEXT STEPS… SLIDE 19 Conducted Voluntary Pre-Submittal Neighborhood Information Meeting Filed Planned Development Rezone Application Undergoing review by County Planning Staff Conduct Required Neighborhood Information Meeting •Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation •Approval by Board of County Commissioners •File Development Order Application & Apply for Permits 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 20 STAY INVOLVED & INFORMED SLIDE 20 Kbrown@seagatedevelopmentgroup.com Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com (239) 405-7777 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 21 COMMUNITY INPUT SLIDE 21 1) Responses to “Chat” Questions 2) Additional Q & A using the “Raise Hand” tool 3) Email/Call with additional input 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 22 THANK YOU! QUESTIONS 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) PALISADES RPUD PL20210000979 Neighborhood Information Meeting October 12, 2021 5:00 p.m. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Project Size: 12+/- Acres Future Land Use: Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict Current Zoning: Residential Single-Family (RSF-1) Proposed Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Maximum Allowable Density: 48 dwelling units Proposed Density/Intensity/Uses: 36 single-family detached dwelling units 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SLIDE 24 Proposed Zoning Map SLIDE 24 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) September 24, 2021 RE: Palisades RPUD PL20210000979 (PUD Rezone) Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Yarberry Partners, LLC (“Applicant”) has filed an application with Collier County. The application is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUD Rezone). The Palisades RPUD (“Project”) is located on 12+/- acres of land and is generally located south of Orange Blossom Drive on the west side of Yarberry Lane. The Applicant is requesting approval to develop 36 single-family dwelling units in the Project. No amendment to the comprehensive plan is necessary to accomplish the development program. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 12 at 5:00 p.m. at North Collier Regional Park located on 15000 Livingston Road, Naples, FL 34109. Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on “Join A Meeting” in the top right corner, and enter Meeting ID: 899 1618 1717 Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 850-8525, or alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Alexis Crespo, AICP Senior Vice President - Planning 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) GATCHELL, DAVID D & JULIE N 1011 W 103 STREET KANSAS CITY, MO 64114 COMM ASSOC FOR STONEGATE AND 1044 CASTELLO DR NAPLES, FL 34103 KRISTOPHERS FUTURE LLC 106 FERRY STREET NEWARK, NJ 07105 PETRESCU, ANTONELA & SILVIU 111 OAK PARK DRIVE WATERLOO, ON N2K 0 CANADA FREUND, JAREK MARIAN 1204 RIDGE ST NAPLES, FL 34103 FLORINE P BERNARD REV TRUST 1219 HAMPTON RDG BEDFORD, VA 24523 NJM PROPERTIES LLC 12304 SW 109TH CT MIAMI, FL 33176 FIELDS, ANTHONY J 1279 5TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34102 360 PROPERTIES LLC 12920 METRO PARKWAY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 HAKAIM, TOM S 1405 E 28TH ST LORAIN, OH 44055 REBLE, LINDA 1585 25TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117 FENG, KE 16109 PARQUE LANE NAPLES, FL 34110 JOHNSON TR, JACK V & GINA 16460 W KINGSTON CT PRAIRIE VIEW, IL 60069 TULLY, MARILYN 1680 MULLET CT NAPLES, FL 34102 LYNN TR, LOIS 1730 W BELFAST ST MESA, AZ 85201 PACIFICA ARBOUR WALK LLC 1775 HANCOCK STREET STE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110 CALIJONE, STEPHEN 18 TAM O SHANTER DRIVE MAHWAH, NJ 07430 PAGAN-ORTIZ, JOSE E 1846 N MELBORN DEARBORN, MI 48128 DOUGHERTY, CHARLES & PATRICIA 188 S BENJAMIN DR WEST CHESTER, PA 19382 NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34109 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT & BACK-UP 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD)20210000979 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-15-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Letter of Objection- Pete Loerzel Stormwater letter 3-29-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Letter of Objection- Pete Loerzel Stormwater letter 3-29-22 (21563 : PL20210000979 - Palisades RPUD) 04/07/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.3 Item Summary: PL20200000115 - GMPA - Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to change the Mixed Use District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to the Mixed Use District, Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict; to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 TO 690; to remove churches and child care facilities as allowed uses; and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located on the Northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Lord's Way in Section 14, Township 50South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69± ACRES. [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 04/07/2022 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Sue Faulkner 03/14/2022 4:31 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/14/2022 4:31 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 03/15/2022 4:19 PM Zoning James Sabo Additional Reviewer Completed 03/18/2022 5:21 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 03/22/2022 11:09 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 03/22/2022 1:31 PM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 03/24/2022 5:00 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/07/2022 9:00 AM 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 278 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 2-1-2022 Exhibit A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 1 I. OVERVIEW 2 A. PURPOSE 2 *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 09 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 09 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 26 Urban Designation *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 154 *Future Land Use Map *Mixed User & Interchange Activity Centers Maps *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** * Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map * Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map * Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map * Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Map * Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Davis ‒ Radio Commercial Subdistrict Map * Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Page 1 of 7 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 2-1-2022 * Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict Map * Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map * Germain Immokalee Commercial Subdistrict Map * Greenway – Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict Map * Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL: TO GUIDE LAND USE DECISION-MAKING SO AS TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WITH A WELL-PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict 18. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict 19. [RESERVED] 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the land use designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or on special studies completed for the County. Page 2 of 7 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 2-1-2022 I. URBAN DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed Use District This District, which represents approximately 116,000 acres, is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict The Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict comprises approximately 69 acres and is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately one -half mile north of the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide community facility a mix of uses, primarily institutional residential uses and other non-commercial uses generally serving the public at large, and residential uses, both affordable and market rate housing, all in a setting to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The Subdistrict is intended to contain a mix of uses and services in a self-sufficient environment, which lessens traffic impacts upon the external transportation network and public services, while serving the needs of the community at large. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Allowable land uses: 1) Community facilities such as churches, gGroup housing uses such as nursing homes, independent care units, and assisted living and continuing care facilities. cemeteries, private schools and colleges. 2) Child care facilities. 32) Residential dwelling units, not to exceed 306 690 units. 43) Essential services, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41, in effect as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict. 54) Parks, open space, and recreational uses. 5) Religious organizations (Group 8661. Limited to churches and religious organizations) shall be permitted to continue within Tract A for a time not to exceed 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance or until such time that a Site Development Plan has been approved for the development of residential units within Tract A, whichever occurs first. After five years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, or when a SDP has been approved for the residential development within Tract A, the identified religious organization use shall cease and is no longer deemed permitted. Further, if the structure of the religious organization is to be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed. Page 3 of 7 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 2-1-2022 c. The maximum floor area for institutional and other non-residential uses shall not exceed 368,000 square feet. d. Of the 306 dwelling units total, a maximum of ten (10) units shall be reserved for occupancy solely by church employees and church-related personnel and their families. The 10 church-related dwelling units will be considered incidental and accessory to the institutional uses within this Subdistrict. e. A requirement shall be put in place at the time of rezoning/PUD amendment that all but nine (9) mobile home units currently on site shall be removed from the subject property prior to the construction of any housing not reserved for church-related employees, staff and program participants. The nine remaining mobile home units may serve as temporary adult care units for program participants; and shall be removed as they are replaced by permanent residential structures, permanent adult care units, or within twenty-four (24) months from the date of adoption of this Subdistrict, whichever is sooner. f. c. One hundred forty-seven of the 296 affordable and market rate housing units in Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord’s Way MPUD, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, as defined in the County’s Local Housing Assistance Plan. g. d. To achieve the density of approximately 4.28 dwelling units per acre 296 dwelling units on Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord’s Way MPUD, and to allow development of the 192 non-church- related, non-base density dwelling units, the project shall comply with one or more of the following: 1) The Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or, 2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units – comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy (70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or, 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty-five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 140% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty-five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. h. e. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable housing dwelling units. e. For the additional 384 affordable and market rate housing units on Tracts A and A-1 of the Collier Boulevard/Lord’s Way MPUD, the project shall comply with the following: Page 4 of 7 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 2-1-2022 1) Seventy-six units will be designated for rental to households whose incomes are between 80% and 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation. OR - 1) Seventy-six units will be designated for sale to households whose initial certified incomes are between 80%-120% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and affordability for all units sold to eligible households will be secured through the execution of a lien in accordance with Chapter 2.06.04 of the LDC between Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the buyer to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida. f. For Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord’s Way MPUD, Nno more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable housing dwelling units. i. g. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the maximum occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non-church-related dwelling units shall be addressed, as deemed appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. j. h. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, consideration shall be given to increasing the landscaping requirements along The Lord’s Way beyond existing Land Development Code requirements. k. i. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the petitioner shall be required to mitigate for the project’s impacts upon affected roadways in accordance with the concurrency management system and as otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. l. Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to 147 dwelling units for persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County and 10 church-related dwelling units. Phase Two development will consist of the remaining 149 market rate units for any prospective property owner, plus any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. For the 149 market rate dwelling units in Phase Two, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until improvements to the existing deficient segment of Davis Boulevard are complete.a Page 5 of 7 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) Collier BLVDRattlesnake Hammock RD Carman DRThe Lords WAYCerromar DRNaples Lakes BLVDWinged Foot CTClub Estates DR Prestwick DR A Better WAYShinnecock Hills CTMil a n o L a k e s C I R Viale WAYSapphire Cove CIRDeliverance ST Sierra Meadows BLVDSedgewood LNWinge d F o o t W A Y HACIENDA LAKES NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB WILLOW RUNHOMES OF ISLANDIA FIRST ASSY. MINST. EDU. & REHAB. MCMULLEN LASIP CONSERVATION AREA LIDO ISLES EXHIBIT A PL20200000115 COLLIER BLVD./LORD'S WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA º0 500 1,000250 Feet DRAFT SUBJECTSITE ADOPTED - XXXX, XXXX (Ord. No. XXXX-X) PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT. FILE:COLLIER BLVD LORDS WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT SITE LOCATION MAP.MXD DATE: SEP. 30, 2021 LEGEND Collier BLVD./Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict Page 6 of 7 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict)Page 6 of 7 COLLIER BLVDTURNER RIVER ROADSR 29INTERSTATE 75 IMMOKALEE RD OIL WELL RD COLLIER BLVDTAMIAMI TRL E CR 846 SR 82 LIVINGSTON RDSR 29 NSAN MARCO RDTAMIAMI TRL NDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NPINE RIDGE RD EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RD GOLDEN GATE PKY DESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD EVANDERBILT DREVERGLADES BLVD SAIRPORT PULLING RD CORKSCREW RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD W C O P E L A N D A V E S9TH ST NS 1ST STN 15TH STBALD EAGLE DR N B A R F I E L D D R GREEN BLVDOLD US 41LAKE TRAFFORD RD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD NN COLLIER BLVDS BARFIELD DRCOUNTY BARN RDS COLL IER BLVD BONITA BEACH RD 111TH AVE N COLLIER AVEN E W M A R K E T R D WWILSON BLVD SW MAIN ST WIGGINS PASS RD 9TH ST SSEAGATE DR I-75 S I-75 NSR 29Tamiami TRL E Oil Well RD Immokalee RD Collier BLVDEverglades BLVDSR 82 CR 846 E Livingston RDDesoto BLVDSan Marco R DAirport RD NTamiami TRL NSR 29 NWilson BLVDDavis BLVD Pine Ridge RD Radio RD Logan BLVD NVanderbilt Beach RDVanderbilt DRGoodlette-Frank RD NRandall BLVD Golden Gate PKWY Camp Keais RDCorkscr e w R D Santa Barbara BLVDGolden Gate BLVD E 9th ST NOld 41Bald Eagle DRN Colli er B L V D Westclox ST Thomasson DR E M a i n S T Bayshore DRSmallwood DRI-75 NI-75 SBayshore DRI -75 S I-75 SI-75 SI-75 N °HENDRY COUNTYMONROE COUNTY LEE COUNTY HENDRY COUNTY 2012-2025FUTURE LAND USE MAP Collier County Florida DETAILS OF THE RLSA OVERLAY AREA ARE SHOWN ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TITLED: "COLLIER COUNTY RURAL & AGRICULTURAL AREA ASSESSMENT STEWARDSHIP OVERLAY MAP" BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE COUNTY PARK DELNOR- WIGGINS STATE PARK CLAM PASS COUNTY PARK CLAM BAY NRPA ROOKERY BAY NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE CITY OF NAPLES TIGERTAIL BEACH COUNTY PARK CITY OF MARCO ISLAND COLLIER- SEMINOLE STATE PARK CAPE ROMANO PORT OF THE ISLANDS CAPE ROMANO - TEN THOUSAND ISLANDS AQUATIC PRESERVE EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK CHOKOLOSKEE PLANTATION ISLAND EVERGLADES CITY COPELAND BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE FAKAHATCHEE STRAND PRESERVE STATE PARK FLORIDA PANTHER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SOUTH GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NRPA BELLE MEADE NRPA NORTH BELLE MEADE NRPA IMMOKALEE CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY CREW NRPA LAKE TRAFFORD R 25 E R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E T 46 ST 47 ST 48 ST 49 ST 50 ST 51 ST 52 ST 53 SR 25 E R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E R 33 E R 34 ET 46 ST 47 ST 48 ST 49 ST 50 ST 51 ST 52 ST 53 S!"#$75 !"#$75 !"#$75 !"#$75 !"#$75 !"#$75 !"#$75 Æþ41 Æþ41 Æþ41 Æþ41 Æþ41 Æþ41 Æþ41 Æþ41 GOODLANDGu lfof Mex i c o 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles J ?EXEMPTAREA PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICP GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE: Collier Blvd Lords Way Mixed Use Subdistrict FLU Map.mxd DATE: 9/30/2021 GOLDEN GATE Veterans Memorial BLVD R 32 E R 33 E R 34 E URBAN DESIGNATION (1) THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWITH MANAGEMENT PLAN. (2) THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES INCLUDES NUMEROUS MAPS IN ADDITION TO THIS COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THESE MAPS ARE LISTED AND LOCATED AT THE END OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TEXT. (3) MOST SUBDISTRICTS AS DEPICTED MAY NOT BE TO SCALE. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES DEPICTS THESE SUBDISTRICTS TO SCALE. (4) THE CONSERVATION DESIGNATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS AREAS ARE ACQUIRED AND MAY INCLUDE OUTPARCELS. (5) REFER TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND THE IMMOKALEE ARE MASTER PLAN FOR FUTURE LAND USE MAPS OF THOSE COMMUNITIES. NOTE : MIXED USE DISTRICT BUSINESS PARK SUBDISTRICT OFFICE AND INFILL COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT PUD NEIGHBORHOOD VILLAGE CENTER SUBDISTRICT RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT RURAL FRINGEMIXED USE DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/RURAL MIXED USE DISTRICT Conservation Designation Estates Designation FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED - JANUARY, 1989 AMENDED - JANUARY, 1990 AMENDED - FEBRUARY, 1991 AMENDED - MAY, 1992 AMENDED - MAY, 1993 AMENDED - APRIL, 1994 AMENDED - OCTOBER, 1997 AMENDED - JANUARY, 1998 AMENDED - FEBRUARY, 1999 AMENDED - FEBRUARY, 2000 AMENDED - MAY, 2000 AMENDED - DECEMBER, 2000 AMENDED - MARCH, 2001 AMENDED - MAY 14, 2002 (Ord. No. 2002-24) AMENDED - JUNE 19, 2002 (Ord. No. 2002-32) AMENDED - OCTOBER 22, 2002 (Ord. No. 2002-54) AMENDED - FEBRUARY 11, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-7) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 9, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-43) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED - DECEMBER 16, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-67) AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004 (Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED - JUNE 7, 2005 (Ord. No. 2005-25) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-18) AMENDED - DECEMBER 4, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-78,79,81) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 (Ord. No. 2008-57,58,59) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 (Ord. No. 2011-26) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 (Ord. No. 2011-27) AMENDED - JANUARY 8, 2013 (Ord. No. 2013-14) AMENDED - MAY 28, 2013 (Ord. No. 2013-41) AMENDED - JUNE 10, 2014 (Ord. No. 2014-20) AMENDED - FEBRUARY 10, 2015 (Ord. No. 2015-13) AMENDED - APRIL 14, 2015 (Ord. No. 2015-26) AMENDED - JUNE 9, 2015 (Ord. No. 2015-32) AMENDED - JULY 7, 2015 (Ord. No. 2015-42) AMENDED - MAY 24, 2016 (Ord. No. 2016-15) AMENDED - JUNE 13, 2017 (Ord. No. 2017-22) AMENDED - DECEMBER 12, 2017 (Ord. No. 2017-46) AMENDED - MAY 8, 2018 (Ord. No. 2018-23) AMENDED - JUNE 12, 2018 (Ord. No. 2018-30) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 (Ord. No. 2018-42) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 (Ord. No. 2018-48) OVERLAYS ANDSPECIAL FEATURES AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 (Ord. No. 2019-21) AMENDED - OCTOBER 8, 2019 (Ord. No. 2019-33) Urban Residential Subdistrict Residential Density Bands Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict Neutral Lands Sending Lands Receiving Lands Rural Industrial District Rural Settlement Area District RURAL COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Area of Critical State Concern Overlay Airport Noise Area Overlay Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay Urban-Rural Fringe Transition Area Overlay North Belle Meade Overlay Incorporated Areas Coastal High Hazard Area AMENDED - JUNE 9, 2020 (Ord. No. 2020-15) Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach / Coller Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict Goodlette / Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict Livingston Road / Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict Ventana Pointe Residential Overlay AMENDED - JULY 14, 2020 (Ord. No. 2020-21) Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BUSINESS PARK SUBDISTRICT RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK SUBDISTRICT Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict Livingston / Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Industrial District BUSINESS PARK SUBDISTRICT RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK SUBDISTRICT Livingston Road / Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Seed To Table Commercial Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict COMMERCIAL MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT Livingston Road / Veterans Memorial Blvd. Commercial Infill Subdistrict Orange Blossom / Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Davis-Radio Commercial Subdistrict Logan Blvd./Immokalee Rd. Commercial Infill Subdistrict Germain Immokalee Commercial Subdistrict Greeway - Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK SUBDISTRICT COMMERCIAL MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Livingston Road / Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Collier Blvd./ Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict AMENDED - OCTOBER 13, 2020 (Ord. No. 2020-31) AMENDED - OCTOBER 27, 2020 (Ord. No. 2020-34) AMENDED - NOVEMBER 10, 2020 (Ord. No. 2020-42) AMENDED - MARCH 1, 2021 (Ord. No. 2021-08) AMENDED - OCTOBER 27, 2020 (Ord. No. 2020-36) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 (Ord. No. 2020-25) DRAFT EXHIBIT "A"PETITION PL20200000115 SUBJECT SITE PL20200000115 Page 7 of 7 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: PL20200000115 Ordinance - 030922 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict)Page 7 of 7 ‒ 1 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: November 4, 2021 SUBJECT: PETITION PL20200000115 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners/Applicant : Agent: David E Torres, Mgr. 3805 TLW, LLC & Lord’s Way Apartments, LLC 7742 Alico Road Naples, FL 33912 Robert Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and The Lord’s Way in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69± acres. See maps below. 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 2 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 3 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE REQUESTED ACTION This petition seeks to amend the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to the Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 to 690; to maintain the communication tower use; and to remove churches and childcare facilities as allowed uses. The large GMPA resolution also requests the Board to transmit the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The proposed amended Future Land Use Element, Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict text is as follows: (Single underline test is added, single strike-through text is deleted, and is also reflected in the Ordinance Exhibit A). EXHIBIT A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 1 I. OVERVIEW 2 A. PURPOSE 2 *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 10 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION Urban Designation *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 140 *Future Land Use Map *Mixed User & Interchange Activity Centers Maps *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** * Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 4 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE * Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map * Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map * Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Map * Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Davis ‒ Radio Commercial Subdistrict Map * Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict Map * Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map * Germain Immokalee Commercial Subdistrict Map * Greenway – Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict Map * Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL: TO GUIDE LAND USE DECISION-MAKING SO AS TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WITH A WELL-PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 5 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE 18. Vincentian Mixed-Use Subdistrict 19. [RESERVED] 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the land use designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or on special studies completed for the County. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed-Use District This District, which represents approximately 116,000 acres, is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict The Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict comprises approximately 69 acres and is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately one- half mile north of the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide community facility a mix of uses, primarily institutional residential uses and other non-commercial uses generally serving the public at large, and residential uses, both affordable and market rate housing, all in a setting to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The Subdistrict is intended to contain a mix of uses and services in a self-sufficient environment, which lessens traffic impacts upon the external transportation network and public services, while serving the needs of the community at large. 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 6 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Allowable land uses: 1) Community facilities such as churches, g Group housing uses such as nursing homes, independent care units, and assisted living and continuing care facilities. cemeteries, private schools and colleges. 2) Child care facilities. 32) Residential dwelling units, not to exceed 306 690 units. 43) Essential services, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41, in effect as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict. 54) Parks, open space, and recreational uses. c. The maximum floor area for institutional and other non-residential uses shall not exceed 368,000 square feet. d. Of the 306 dwelling units total, a maximum of ten (10) units shall be reserved for occupancy solely by church employees and church-related personnel and their families. The 10 church- related dwelling units will be considered incidental and accessory to the institutional uses within this Subdistrict. e. A requirement shall be put in place at the time of rezoning/PUD amendment that all but nine (9) mobile home units currently on site shall be removed from the subject property prior to the construction of any housing not reserved for church-related employees, staff and program participants. The nine remaining mobile home units may serve as temporary adult care units for program participants, and shall be removed as they are replaced by permanent residential structures, permanent adult care units, or within twenty-four (24) months from the date of adoption of this Subdistrict, whichever is sooner. f. c. One hundred forty-seven of the 296 affordable and market rate housing units in Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord’s Way MPUD, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, as defined in the County’s Local Housing Assistance Plan. g. d. To achieve the density of approximately 4.28 dwelling units per acre 296 dwelling units on Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord’s Way MPUD, and to allow development of the 192 non- church-related, non-base density dwelling units, the project shall comply with one or more of the following: 1) The Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or, 2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy (70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or, 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 7 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty-five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 140% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty- five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. h. e. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable housing dwelling units. i. f. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the maximum occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non-church-related dwelling units shall be addressed, as deemed appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. j. g. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, consideration shall be given to increasing the landscaping requirements along The Lord’s Way beyond existing Land Development Code requirements. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the petitioner shall be required to mitigate for the project’s impacts upon affected roadways in accordance with the concurrency management system and as otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. k. Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to 147 dwelling units for persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County and 10 church-related dwelling units. Phase Two development will consist of the remaining 149 market rate units for any prospective property owner, plus any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. For the 149 market rate dwelling units in Phase Two, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until improvements to the existing deficient segment of Davis Boulevard are complete. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The Future Land Use Element was first amended in December 2007 via Ordinance No. 2007-79 to create the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict. The acreage is proposed to remain the same at 69± acres. Currently there are 306 dwelling units built and they consist of both affordable-workforce and market rate housing. No new land uses will be added to this project beyond the previously approved uses, but instead several land uses will be removed (church uses, cemeteries, private schools and colleges, childcare, and commercial uses). The applicant is maintaining language for Group housing uses such as nursing homes, independent care units, and assisted living and continuing care facilities. Should the applicant wish to continue an interim use for the church until such time as the Site Development Plan is approved for development within Tract A or 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, whichever occurs first; staff has included some suggested text that could be included (in the recommendation of the GMP Amendment). The applicant will also continue the existing use for a communications tower. The currently proposed large scale GMP amendment seeks to amend the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to create the Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict, a mostly residential project. The proposed amendment will allow for a large increase of the maximum dwelling units from 306 (gross density of 4.43 dwelling units per acre) to 690 dwelling units (which would be a gross density of 10 dwelling units per acre). Out of the additional 384 (690-306) dwelling units being requested, no additional affordable-workforce housing is proposed. 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 8 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subject Property: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict with the underlying designation of Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. It is partially developed with 306 DUs (apartments for rental) and community facilities such as a church. The 306 dwelling units include 10 units reserved for occupancy solely by church employees and church-related dwelling units will be considered incidental and accessory to the institutional uses within this Subdistrict. The subject property also has an existing essential services land use, a communications tower. There is also a portion of the subject property that is wooded. The property also has recreational open space. Surrounding Lands: North: Future Land Use Element Designation is Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Agricultural. To the north of the parcel directly adjoining, the land north is designated Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Hacienda Lakes MPUD. East: Future Land Use Element Designation; the land east is designated Urban, Urban Mixed- Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Hacienda Lakes MPUD. South: Directly to the south is The Lord’s Way Road. Further to the south is Future Land Use Element Designation; Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Agricultural and also Lord’s Way 30 Acre RPUD (single family homes). West: Directly to the West is Collier Boulevard. Further to the west is Future Land Use Element Designation; Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict; and Zoned Naples Lakes Country Club (residential condominiums). In summary, the existing and planned land uses in the larger surrounding area are primarily low- density single and multi-family residences and undeveloped or agricultural parcels. STAFF ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations: The Future Land Use Element was amended in December 2007 via Ordinance No. 2007-79 to create the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict. The subject site (Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict consists of 69± acres and is designated in the Future Land Use Element as Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and zoned as First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus (PUDA). The 2007 subdistrict was approved for a total of 306 dwelling units at a density of (306 DUs / 69 acres= 4.43 DUs/Acre. For those specific properties identified within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, this density bonus is allowed but only to a maximum of six (6) residential units per gross acre. The density was allowed to be significantly increased in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict due to the use of one or more of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code as follows: 1) The Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or, 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 9 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE 2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy (70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or, 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty-five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 140% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty- five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. However, the subject site did not achieve the full Affordable Housing Density Bonus of 6 DUs / acre discussed in the FLUE, because the applicant requested 57 market rate DUs. The 2007 subdistrict also had the following restriction applied of no more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable housing dwelling units. The 2021 request (PL20200000115) to create a new mostly residential uses subdistrict, adding 384 dwelling units to the 69± acre site provides insufficient public benefit to support the proposed amendment. A site with 690 DUs on 69 acres calculates to a total density of 10 DUs per acre. This density is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element as stated above - the maximum gross density has already been achieved with the Affordable Housing Density Bonus for 4.43 DUs/acre. Compatibility: The subject site’s residential use is a similar use to the surrounding area’s land uses; however, the proposed gross density of 10± DUs / acre is not consistent with the surrounding PUDs which have a lower approved residential density. Naples Lakes is approved for 1.56 DUs/acre Hacienda Lakes is approved for 0.78 DUs/acre Sierra Meadows is approved for 5.27 DUs/acre – in Activity Center and Density band Hammock Park is approved for 13.85 DUs/acre – in Activity Center There are two proposed sites with multi-family for sale or apartments with no affordable or workforce housing: Amerisite is requesting 303 DUs or 16DUs/acre Carman Drive is requesting 13.8 DUs/acre Justifications for Proposed Amendment: The submitted Narrative and Justification document dated 2-12-21 was not updated to address the final proposed amendment. There was no submitted explanation of why the gross density should be approximately 10 DUs/acre. 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 10 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Large Scale Compehensive Plan Amendment Criteria in Florida Statutesw Chapter 163.3187 Criteria for GMP Amendments in Florida Statutes Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area’s proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 11 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. It is incumbent upon the petitioner to provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan amendment, then present and defend, as necessary, that data and analysis Environmental Impacts and Historical and Archaeological Impacts: Jaime Cook approved the project and stated “CCME Policies addressed in Exhibit V. D1 Narrative and Justification. No impacts to preserve. Jaime Cook 01/07/2021” Public Facilities Impacts: Eric Fey, Principal Project Manager for Public Utilities, approved the application after receiving a revised document Public Utilities Report (Exhibit VE1) addressing revised uses. Approved in CityView on 6-21-2021. 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 12 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE Transportation Impacts: Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Analysis. Transportation Element Consistency Determination: A Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by Trebilcock Planning and Engineering was submitted as part of this petition. Transportation Planning staff reviewed the TIS and the petition for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan using the current 2020 AUIR. Staff finds the TIS to be sufficient and have no objections to the Transmittal of this GMPA petition. Approved by Michael Sawyer; Project Manager, Capital Projects Planning, Impact Fees, Program Management on 3-16-21. Community and Human Services: Jacob LaRow, Manager – Housing, Grant Development and Operations, reviewed the proposed amendment and recommended the following text additions to the Subdistrict amendment (Exhibit A): (4) enter into an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement under Chapter 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code of Collier County for 384 dwelling units and making available the requisite number of affordable units to achieve the overall Subdistrict density of 10 DUs per acre. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: The Neighborhood Information Meeting was duly advertised and held on Wednesday May 5, 2021, at 5:30 PM at the New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall – Room 211, 7675 Davis Blvd., Naples, FL 34104. The NIM was held for both a large scale GMPA – Collier Blvd. Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20200000115) and a zoning companion Collier Blvd. Lord’s Way PUDA (PL20200000114). Mr. Bob Mulhere presented all consultant staff and County staff. Five members of the public attended. He explained the NIM process and a history and overview of the project. Question and answer period followed. Questions concerned transportation/roadways that are planned for extensions to Rattlesnake and Lord’s Way to Benfield Rd. With the removal of some of the Community Facilities uses, traffic volume is expected to decrease. David Torres indicated he intended to develop a multi-family for sale product. A statement was also made that the church will be used an interim use until the proposed multi-family residential begins. Meeting adjourned at 5:55 PM. PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY STAFF: No correspondence was received. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The reason for this GMPA (and for a companion PUDA zoning petition that will be presented for adoption at a public hearing at a later time) is to allow up to 384 dwelling units in addition to the existing 306 dwelling units for a total of 690 dwelling units. The applicant is also proposing removing some community facility uses and commercial uses by creating a new subdistrict. • Collier County Public Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs, as well as wastewater service. The subject property is within the South Service Area. Collier 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 13 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE County Public Utilities has sufficient capacity to provide water and sewer. Public Utilities staff approved the project 6-21-2021. • Transportation planning staff approved the project 3-16-21. • Environmental Impacts and Historical and Archaeological Impacts staff approved the project 1-7-2021. • The applicant is proposing insufficient public benefit. • The requested density of 10± DUs per acre is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office on October 14, 2021. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Future Land Use Element and map series are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends not supporting the proposed amendment. Staff could support the request if the affordable housing bonus was targeted to income levels more in line with the existing affordable housing density bonus. Should the Planning Commission wish to recommend adding text for the interim use of the church, please see the suggested text below: VIII. INTERIM USE Religious organizations (Group 8661. Limited to churches and religious organizations) shall be permitted to continue within Tract A for a time not to exceed 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance or until such time that a Site Development Plan has been approved for the development of residential units within Tract A, whichever occurs first. After five years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, or when an SDP has been approved for the residential development within Tract A, the identified religious organization use shall cease and is no longer deemed permitted. Further, if the structure of the religious organization is to be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed. Prepared by Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) ‒ 14 ‒ PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed Use Subdistrict – FLUE 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) SUPPLEMENTARY STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: APRIL 7, 2022 SUBJECT: PETITION PL20200000115 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT The Collier County Planning Commission met on November 4, 2021 and voted 4-1 in favor of recommending to the BCC that they approve transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). The Board voted in favor of transmittal of PL202100000115 to the DEO (vote 4/1) on 12/14/21, the agenda packet was sent to the DEO on 12-22-2021. The County received a transmittal response from Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), offering technical assistance for Florida Black Bear control on 1-19-2022. The DEO wrote a letter dated 2-2-2022 stating that they conducted a detailed review that focused on potential adverse impacts to important state resources and facilities, specifically: air and water pollution; wetlands and other surface waters of the state; federal and state-owned lands and interest in lands, including state parks, greenways and trails, conservation easements; solid waste; and water and wastewater treatment. The Florida DEO did not find any adverse impacts to important state resources subject to the Department’s jurisdiction according to their letter dated 2-2-2022. The state assigned the following: Collier County 21-08ESR Expedited State Review of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to this project. There was a discussion at the BCC public hearing on 12-22-2021 concerning how many affordable housing units should be included with this project. The applicant’s transitional proposed language had suggested 38 dwelling units should be affordable. The BCC wished to increase the affordable housing being provided. Jacob LaRow, Manager of Collier County Housing, Grant Development, and Operations worked on the proposed language with the applicants, and they agreed to the revised proposed language that is presented in Ordinance #030922 Exhibit’s A. The main proposed revisions are: The church use will be allowed as an interim use for up to a maximum of 5 years. Increase the Affordable Housing dwelling units from 38 to 76. Affordable housing is detailed here: 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: SUPPLEMENTARY STAFF REPORT (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 1) Seventy-six units will be designated for rental to households whose incomes are between 80% and 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation. OR - 1) Seventy-six units will be designated for sale to households whose initial certified incomes are between 80%-120% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and affordability for all units sold to eligible households will be secured through the execution of a lien in accordance with Chapter 2.06.04 of the LDC between Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the buyer to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida. Prepared by Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning 3-14-2022 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: SUPPLEMENTARY STAFF REPORT (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 305Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 306Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 307Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 308Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 309Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 310Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 311Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 312Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 313Attachment: NIM Documents May 5 2021 (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) H:\2019\2019076\WP\2nd NIM\NIM Summary (12-8-2021)_PM.docx NIM SUMMARY Collier Blvd Lord’s Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) Collier Blvd Lord’s Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall – Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Collier Blvd Lord’s Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to allow for additional residential development; and 2. Collier Blvd Lord’s Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) An amendment to rename the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to the Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD, to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Attendees: On behalf of Applicants: David Torres, ML Land, LLC and 3805 TLW, LLC (Applicant) Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman Yovanovich Koester Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, Inc. Paula McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA County Staff: Sue Faulkner, Comprehensive Planning Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Zoning Services Two members of the public attended. One member of the public participated via Zoom. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the property owner, the other consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history and overview of the project. Mr. Torres then explained why a second NIM is being held. A commitment was made at the previous NIM to only offer a for-sale product. At the transmittal hearing for the GMPA before the Collier County Planning Commission , Collier County Staff requested that 10% of the new units proposed be affordable housing units. If affordable housing units are required, the developer will not be able to honor th e commitment to only offer a for-sale product but instead will develop the project as rental units. There was approximately five minutes of questions. 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: NIM Summary (12-8-2021) (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) H:\2019\2019076\WP\2nd NIM\NIM Summary (12-8-2021)_PM.docx The following issues were raised: Public Hearings and Notification Questions were raised regarding the public hearing and notification process. A letter was sent to property owners within 500’ of the project notifying them of the NIM, and an ad was placed in the Naples Daily News. Public hearings are advertised by the county via a sign posted on the property and an ad in the Naples Daily News. The request is scheduled to be heard in the by the Board of County Commissioners on December 14, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Chambers located within the Collier County Government Center. General/Misc. A question was asked regarding commercial development. There is no commercial development proposed. If approved, the requested amendment removes the previously approved institutional uses. A question was asked regarding access for the project. Access to the proposed development will be via The Lord’s Way. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:47 PM. 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: NIM Summary (12-8-2021) (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Sign Location Map (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way Subdistrict) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE COLLIER BLVD LORD’S WAY PUDA (PL-20200000114) COLLIER BOULEVARD-LORDS WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL-20200000115) CCPC: APRIL 7, 2022 - 9:00 a.m. BCC: MAY 24, 2022 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners’ Chambers Third Floor, Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 NANCY GUNDLACH, AICP, PLA, PRINCIPAL PLANNER: 239-252-2484 SUE FAULKNER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER: 239-252-5715 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Public Hearing Sign (3-11-2022) (21695 : GMP Amendment - Collier Blvd Lords Way 04/07/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.4 Item Summary: PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 08-41, the First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, as amended, to change the name of the MPUD to Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD; to remove the day care use and allow the church use as an interim use for up to 5 years; to increase the number of dwelling units from 306 units to 690 units with 76 affordable housing units; and to reallocate the uses, revise the development standards and the PUD master plan for the PUD property consisting of 69± acres located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) and Hacienda Lakes Parkway formerly Lord’s Way, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 04/07/2022 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 03/14/2022 4:00 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/14/2022 4:00 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 03/15/2022 11:53 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 03/22/2022 11:17 AM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 03/22/2022 1:20 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 03/22/2022 1:53 PM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 03/24/2022 4:52 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/07/2022 9:00 AM 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 318 COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 1 of 20 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: APRIL 7, 2022 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20200000114, COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) FORMERLY KNOWN AS FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD), COMPANION TO PL20200000115, COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MIXED-USE SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA) ______________________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNERS: 3805 TLW, LLC/ 3805 TLW, LLC and David E. Torres, MGR 3713 Milano Lakes FL Owner, LLC 7742 Alico Road % Revantage Property Tax Fort Myers, FL 33912 PO Box A3878 Chicago, IL 60690 AGENTS: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Paula N.C. McMichael, AICP Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Hole Montes, Inc 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34103 Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider amending Ordinance Number 2008-41, the First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), as amended, to change the name of the PUD to Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD; to remove the daycare use and allow the church use as an interim use for up to 5 years; to increase the number of dwelling units from 306 units to 690 units 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 2 of 20 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 320Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 3 of 20 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 321Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 4 of 20 with 76 affordable housing units; and to reallocate the uses, revise the development standards and the PUD Master Plan. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and The Lord’s Way. The subject PUD is 68.78± acres and is located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD, formerly known as First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, was approved by Ordinance Number 08-41on July 22, 2008. (See Attachment B-Ordinance Number 08-41.) There has been one amendment to Ordinance Number 08-4, Ordinance Number 15-55. (See Attachment C-Ordinance Number 15-55). A companion Growth Management Plan amendment is also proposed, the Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed- Use Subdistrict (PL20200000115), to authorize the proposed changes. The petitioner is proposing the following changes with this amendment: • Change the name of the First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD to Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD; • Remove the daycare use and allow the church use as an interim use for up to 5 years; • Add group housing/Adult Living Facilities (ALF) as a land use; • Increase the number of single-family attached or multi-family dwelling units by 384, from 306 units to 690 units at a density of 10.03 dwelling units per acre; • Of the 384 additional dwelling units, 76 units will be affordable units; and • Reallocate the uses, revise the development standards and the Master Plan. The Master Plan has been revised to show the location of the proposed residential area within the proposed Mixed-Use Subdistrict area. For further information, see Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: undeveloped land with an (A) Agricultural zoning designation and undeveloped residential portion of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD with a density of .88 dwelling units per acre East: Swamp Buggy Grounds, and the recently approved residential and public services portion of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD with a density of .88 dwelling units per acre South: The Lord’s Way right-of-way, then undeveloped land with an (A) Agricultural zoning designation and The Lord’s Way 30 Acre RPUD with a density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre West: 100-foot-wide Henderson Creek Canal right-of-way, then Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and a golf course at Naples Lake Country Club, with a density of 1.56 dwelling units per acre 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 5 of 20 AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment and upon adoption of the companion item GMPA-PL20200000115, Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed-Use Subdistrict GMPA, the PUD Rezone can be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s January 11, 2021, TIS and revised PUD Document for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or SUBJECT PROPERTY 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 6 of 20 adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five-year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS and revised PUD document the proposed change will allow up to 690 multi-family residential units for this development. The TIS for this request includes a table indicating that the current PUD allows up to +/- 585 PM peak hour trips on the adjacent road network. The TIS also shows that the proposed 690 multi-family unit development will generate +/-330 PM peak hour trips on the same road network which represents a potential decrease in the number of trips generated by this PUD of +/-255 PM peak hour trips. Staff also notes that the current PUD does not have a trip cap developer commitment; however, the proposed PUD Amendment, with Exhibit F.3.I. provides a trip cap of +/- 330 PM peak hour trips consistent with the TIS. Based on the TIS and the revised PUD, the subject petition can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan because there are +/- 255 fewer PM peak hour trips proposed with this PUD Amendment than is currently allowed and a trip cap developer commitment is provided in recognition of this reduction. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The native vegetation required to be retained for the PUD was approved in accordance with Ordinance 08-41. No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD petition are being requested. GMP Conclusion: The subject PUD amendment petition may only be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP if the companion Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way Mixed-Use GMPA (PL20200000115) is approved. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 7 of 20 Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The existing preserve area will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are readily available via connections to existing infrastructure on-site and within adjacent rights-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. The applicant has included a developer commitment (7.B) to utilize the existing 10” water main on the east side of Celebration Boulevard for water service to Tracts A, B, and C, or else abandon it in accordance with the requirements of the latest Collier County Water-Sewer District standards. Adequate downstream wastewater system capacit y must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review through a thorough engineering analysis, which will be discussed at a mandatory pre-submittal conference with representatives from the Public Utilities Engineering and Project Management Division and the Growth Management Development Review Division. As stated in Section 7 of Exhibit F of the PUD document, any improvements to the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s wastewater collection/transmission system necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the Collier County Water-Sewer District at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. The existing 6" force main along the north side of The Lords Way is of sufficient size to serve the PUD with a maximum of 690 multi-family dwelling units plus upstream flows. The existing pumps at PS 302.58, which serves Sapphire Cove and EMS Station No. 25 and is also designed for future development of the Hacienda Lakes Business Park (BP) Tract, may need to be downsized to accommodate this project. Meanwhile, the existing pumps at private PS 9000.84, which serves Milano Lakes Apartments and the existing church, may need to be upsized to accommo date this project. Alternatively, the future residential project on Tract A may connect a new force main to the existing 12” force main in the southbound lanes of Collier Boulevard. Landscape Review: The applicant is seeking 1 deviation related to landscape buffers. See Deviation Discussion on the proceeding pages. The remaining buffers labeled on the proposed updated Master Plan are consistent with the Master Plan in Ordinance Number 15-55. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 8 of 20 Zoning and Land Development Review: The Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD is developed and approved for 306 dwelling units, a radio tower, a church, and daycare use. The existing multi- family apartment dwelling units are located on Tract G. Tract C is currently developed with a radio tower. The amendment to the Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD proposes to add 384 single- family attached or multi-family dwelling units and/or group housing/ALF to the PUD. The proposed 384 additional dwelling units and/or ALF will be located on Tracts A, A-1, and C of the Master Plan. (Refer to Master Plan on page 3 of this Staff Report.) Seventy-six of the proposed units will be designated as affordable and market-rate housing units. The building heights of the proposed dwelling units and ALF are the same as the existing apartments on Tract G. The proposed and existing buildings are four stories, with a zoned building height of 52 feet and an actual height of 56 feet. The proposed setback for multi-family development on Tracts A-1 and C from the existing apartments on Tract G is 15 feet for a two-story building, 25 feet for a three-story building, and 35 feet for a four-story building. The proposed front setback is 20 feet, the current Tract G standard is 25 feet. The proposed rear yard setback is 5 feet, the current Tract G standard is 25 feet. There are nine new and/or revised deviations related to landscaping, signage, sidewalks, street interconnection, floor area ratio (FAR), and right-of-way width. The Master Plan has been revised to show the location of the proposed A-1 tract and to note the deviations. For further information regarding the deviations, please see the Deviation section of this Staff Report. Zoning staff finds the proposed residential and ALF to be compatible with the existing residential land uses and intensities. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map, and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP upon adoption of the companion GMPA. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 9 of 20 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood’s existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. At the time the subject property was rezoned to an MPUD, it was deemed to be of sufficient size and did not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change this finding. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to add single-family attached and multi-family residences and /or an ALF. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff believes that the proposed PUD Amendment can be deemed consistent with the County’s land- use policies upon adoption of the companion GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure will continue to have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of each development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 10 of 20 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Amendment will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas outside the PUD. Furthermore, the PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. The Master Plan further demonstrates that the locations of proposed preserve and open space areas should further ensure light, and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD Amendment will not adversely impact property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties around this property are already mostly developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Upon adoption of the companion GMPA, the proposed development will comply with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations; however, the petitioner is seeking this PUD Amendment in compliance with LDC provisions. The proposed amendment meets the intent of the PUD district, and the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 11 of 20 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this proj ect will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services is consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria.” 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The PUD already receives potable water and wastewater services from the CCWSD, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities available to future development as proposed by this petition 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 12 of 20 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control. Additionally, the development will be required to gain platting and/or site development plan approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has found this petition consistent with the overall GMP upon adoption of the companion GMPA. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The currently approved development, landscaping, and buffering standards were determined to be compatible with the adjacent uses and with the use mixture within the project itself at the time the PUD was approved. Staff believes that this amendment will not change the project’s compatibility, both internally and externally, with the proposed residential land use along with the proposed deviation. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure will continue to be sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of each development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. According to Sec. 134-57(a) of the Collier County Code of Ordinances, the availability of potable water and wastewater services will be verified in writing by the CCWSD before the submittal of construction documents. No public utility facility adequacy issues are anticipated at this time. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 13 of 20 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including readily available County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is seeking nine new or revised deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06 A.). Staff believes that the deviations proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Please, refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive examination of the deviations. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking nine new or revised deviations from the requirements of the LDC. Two of the originally proposed deviations have been withdrawn. The deviations are found in PUD Exhibit E “List of Requested Deviations.” The deviation locations are depicted on the PUD Master Plan. The language that has been added to a deviation is underlined; language that has been removed from a deviation has been struck thru. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Deviation #1 Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, Buffer Requirements, which requires a 20-foot-wide Type D buffer along The Lord’s Way and Collier Boulevard, to allow this the perimeter buffers along The Lord’s Way and Collier Boulevard to be reduced from 20 feet to 10 feet in width along Tract G, the Multi-Family Tract. If a wall or fence is installed along the southern property boundary, it shall be located in the middle of the landscape buffer. This deviation will also allow the existing 10-foot wide buffer to remain on Tract A adjacent to The Lord’s Way prior to the widening of The Lord’s Way and to allow this Type D buffer to remain 10 feet in width after the widening of The Lord’s Way and to be relocated to the north of the existing sidewalk. The plantings in the 10 foot Type D buffer area on Tract A shall be located just to the north of the sidewalk. The 10-foot buffer along the Lords Way shall be located north of the existing 30-foot ROW easement and north of a 10-foot ROW reservation described in Section 3A of Exhibit F of the PUD document. No buffer shall be required on the northern or western boundary along preserve 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 14 of 20 Tract E. (See Exhibit I, The Lord’s Way Typical Cross Sections for Tract A and G.) Petitioner’s Justification: The deviation for 10-foot Type D buffer along The Lord’s Way was previously approved and installed along the Tract G portion of the site. The new landscape buffer for the western Tracts will match the buffer already installed and in place. A graphic (see Exhibit C-2, Collier Boulevard Lord’s Way MPUD – Plan and Section) depicting the proposed buffer along Collier Blvd is provided to indicate proposed landscape enhancements to ensure sufficient plantings. The site also has an existing stormwater lake on Tract A and a proposed setback of 100 feet to Collier Boulevard that will ensure an attractive view from the adjacent arterial road. The preserve totals almost 13 acres and measures approximately 500 feet by 1000 feet, more than adequate area to buffer uses to the south and east from adjacent properties. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #2 Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.C.16.b.i, to allow an off-site premises sign in the southwest corner of the subject property on Tract A. The deviation is to exceed the maximum area of 12 square feet to allow the off-site premise sign to be a maximum size of 32square feet as an addition to the existing sign. (See MPUD Master Plan and Exhibit G depicting proposed sign detail.) Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is withdrawn. Deviation #3 3A. Deviation No. 3A seeks relief from LDC Section 05.06.04.C.1.c, that allows a maximum sign area of 80 square feet. The deviation is to allow a maximum size of 132 square feet in area. The sign is currently 100 feet in area. (See Exhibit G for sign detail and also Deviation No. 2.) 3B. Deviation No. 3B seeks relief from LDC Section 05.06.04.C.16.b.ii., that limits the height of the sign to 8 feet above the lowest center grade of the arterial roadway and to allow the existing sign to remain 20 feet in height. 3C. Deviation No. 3C seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.C.1.a, that limits the size of signs to 15 feet to allow the existing 20 foot tall sign to remain. 3.A. Deviation No. 3A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04 G.1., which permits off-premises directional signs in nonresidential and agricultural zoning districts, to allow for one off- premises directional sign within a residential district within a residential district Tract A, 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 15 of 20 that will provide signage for developments located along The Lord’s Way, including but not limited to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, Sapphire Cove (Lord’s Way 30 PUD), and Milano Lakes (Tract G of this PUD). 3.B. Deviation No. 3B seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04 G.2.a., which limits the size of an off-premises directional sign to no more than 12 square feet in area, to allow an off- premises directional sign at a maximum sign face area of 128 square feet (64 square feet on each side). 3.C. Deviation No. 3C seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04 G.2.b., which limits the height of off-premises directional signs to 8 feet in height, measured above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location, to allow a maximum height of 10 feet. 3.D. Deviation No. 3D seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04 G.2.e. Off-premises directional signs, which requires an off-site premises directional sign be located no more than 1,000 feet from the building, structure, or use for which the sign is displayed, to allow the one off-premises sign on Tract A to serve other communities or users along The Lord’s Way regardless of distance, including but not limited to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, Sapphire Cove (Lord’s Way 30 PUD), and Milano Lakes (Tract G of this PUD). Petitioner’s Justification: The proposed off-premises directional sign will be located adjacent to C.R. 951, which is a six-lane, high-speed arterial roadway, and will aid motorists in locating the developments within this PUD and those along The Lord’s Way. Allowing for an off-premises directional sign for the projects along The Lord’s Way will encourage a master-planned development feel for the few developments along The Lord’s Way. There are existing sites within Collier County that have utilized similar signage for multiple developments or have allowed for a residential sign off-premises. One sign, located at the north side of the intersection of Valewood Drive and Immokalee Road, contains the name of four distinct communities that are intended to fall within the Quail Creek PUD. However, this sign also includes Quail Creek Country Club and Estates which does not fall within the Quail Creek PUD boundaries, as it is zoned RSF-2. The second example of an off-premises directional sign for residential development is located at the northeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and C.R.951, within a tract of the Hammock Park MPUD that allows for commercial and residential uses. This existing sign serves as an off- premises sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD, which is further east and to the south of the Hammock Park MPUD. Given the size, location, and combined nature of the projects to be identified on the sign, a larger sign will be necessary for clear identification. It is not anticipated that this deviation will result in a precedent to include identification of additional projects along The Lord’s Way as the Florida Sports Park, located adjacent to the end of The Lord’s Way, will remain at that location for the foreseeable future and prevent additional projects from being developed on the east end of The Lord’s Way. Approval of this deviation will have no discernable impact on surrounding properties and will not infringe upon public health, safety, or welfare. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 16 of 20 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends denial, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has not demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Staff notes that Directory signs are prohibited on residential properties and are limited to commercial properties. The commercial directory signs identify businesses for the benefit of the traveling public and are an important economic benefit to a business. Residential properties have the benefit of real estate signs when they are for sale. The purpose of the sign code is “to provide minimum control of signs necessary to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Collier County, Florida, by lessening hazards to pedestrians and vehicular traffic, by preserving property values, by preventing unsightly and detrimental signs that detract from the aesthetic appeal of the county and lead to economic decline and blight, by preventing signs from reaching such excessive size and numbers that they obscure one another to the detriment of the county, by assuring good and attractive design that will strengthen the county's appearance and economic base….” Deviation #4 4A. Deviation No. 4A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.C.16.b.v, which requires an off- site premise sign be located within 1,000 feet of the intersection of the roadway to allow the sign to be 1,400 feet from the property it serves on Tract G. Deviation No. 4B4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements to allow relief from the requirement that a 6-foot-wide sidewalk and bike lane be provided along The Lord’s Way (a requirement for The Lord’s Way upon becoming an arterial or collector roadway in the future). The deviation is to allow the northerly most existing 5- 7 foot wide sidewalk to remain west of the existing entrance into First Assembly Ministries on Tract A to satisfy the pedestrian access requirements of LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1. This deviation will also allow a 5- foot wide sidewalk to be constructed within a five-foot easement area on Tract G, the multi-family tract, to satisfy this LDC requirement. (See also Exhibit I, The Lords Way Typical Cross Sections.) Petitioner’s Justification: The Lord’s Way is designated as a local road at this time, which requires a 5-foot-wide sidewalk. Currently, there are two sidewalks, one 5-foot wide and one 7-foot wide. Once the western Tracts are developed, the 5-foot sidewalk will remain. The deviation anticipates that The Lord’s Way will become a collector and the sidewalk requirement will change to a 6-foot- wide sidewalk. The deviation requests that the current five-foot-wide sidewalk meet the requirement for a 6-foot-wide sidewalk in the future condition. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 17 of 20 Deviation #5 Deviation No. 4C5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements which requires a minimum 12-foot-wide pathway 6 foot wide sidewalk and bike lane along C.R. 951, an arterial roadway, to allow for a new 610-foot sidewalk and bike lane pathway to be constructed off-site of the PUD and within the canal to replace an existing 7-foot-wide sidewalk along a portion of the C.R. 951 road frontage. on property belonging to First Assembly Ministries to satisfy this requirement or by providing money in lieu of providing a sidewalk. A connection Connections will be provided from the sidewalk on The Lord’s Way to the sidewalk which the County has will constructed on C.R. 951 east of the canal at the intersection of The Lord’s Way and C.R. 951, from the County constructed sidewalk to the proposed 6 10-foot sidewalk pathway and from the proposed 610-foot pathway sidewalk to the existing 7-foot sidewalk on Tract E Petitioner’s Justification: The site has limited space between the canal easement and the existing on-site lakes. The existing 7-foot sidewalk conflicts with the required 20- foot-wide buffer. The LDC requires a 12-foot pathway, and the applicant will agree to construct a 10-foot pathway but within the canal easement for the portion of the sidewalk within Tract A. This condition will be consistent with the sidewalk to the north and south along CR 951. The existing 7-foot sidewalk within Tract A will be removed. This allows for additional space for the landscape buffer. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #6 Deviation No. 56 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.B, Street System Requirements, which requires that the layout of all developments be coordinated with surrounding properties to provide interconnections. The deviation is to allow private access to both the church campus and multi- family development Tract G to be private entrances and to not require interconnection between the two uses from Tract G to the rest of the PUD. A provision has been made for a potential future access from Tract G to the east. Petitioner’s Justification: Revisions to this deviation are for clarity as the church is no longer a proposed use. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #7 Deviation No. 6 7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1, Group Housing which requires a 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 18 of 20 maximum floor area ratio that shall not exceed 0.45 for care units, to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.60 for group housing. The deviation is to allow the care units to be developed within the 368,000 square feet of floor area for all uses. Petitioner’s Justification: The design of continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs) has changed in recent years, with CCRCs now offering additional recreational, educational, and health services directly on campus, in addition to personal services, such as hair salons, banks, health spas, and other concierge services. Continuing care communities in particular are designed to accommodate the needs of residents from retirement living into long-term care, if needed. These communities offer both the extent and quality of amenities that a resident expects from a retirement community in Naples, as well as all of the needed health care facilities for long-term care, offering skilled nursing and memory care. The additional floor area ratio will provide flexibility for facilities that provide multiple stages of care and a variety of unit types. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #8 Deviation No. 6A 8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.3.b, Group Housing, that requires 0.75 parking spaces per assisted living unit, to allow 0.75 parking spaces per 10 care units. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation was previously approved. Deviation #9 Deviation No. 7 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.06.02.D.4 and 5.03.02.E.3, pertaining to minimum landscape buffer width and minimum wall setback, respectively. The LDC requires that a 15 foot wide Type B landscape buffer and a 10 foot wide Type A landscape buffers be provided along the property boundary between Tract G, the multi-family tract, and Tracts A and C of First Assembly Ministries’ campus with the 15 foot Type B buffer to be provided for the more intensive use (i.e., on Tracts A and C) and the 10 foot Type A buffer to be provided for the less intensive use (i.e., on Tract G). The a LDC also requires that the non-residential use provide a minimum 6 foot high concrete (precast or masonry) wall a minimum of 6 feet from the residential zoning district boundary (i.e., at least 6 feet inside Tracts A and C). The LDC allows for reductions in required buffer widths to a minimum width of 10 feet provided that compensating increases in width are made elsewhere in the buffer. The deviation is to locate the buffers within platted easements as depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan, departing in places from the property line and with portions of either buffer encroaching onto an adjacent tract(s). Areas depicted in the legend represent reductions in buffer width and include compensating increases in buffer width. Portions of the 10 foot Type A buffer on Tract G – Phase 2 (i.e., adjacent to Celebration Boulevard, the existing entry road into Tract A) are shown with a reduction to less than 10 feet, severed in some places, due to the encroachment of proposed impervious improvements. The required wall shall be located a minimum of 6 feet from the residential side of the 15 foot Type B buffer. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 19 of 20 Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation was previously approved but has been withdrawn. A 10-foot Type A buffer will be provided on Tracts A and C adjacent to Tract G. Deviation No. 8 seeks relief to LDC Section 4.06.02.C, Table 2.4, which requires buffering internal to uses within Tracts A and C. The deviation is to allow no buffering between uses internal to Tracts A and C. See also Deviation No. 7 that provides buffering between Tracts A and C. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is withdrawn. Deviation No. 9 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01, Private Roadway Width, which requires a 60-foot right-of-way width for local roads, to allow that private roadways shall have a minimum 40- foot right-of-way width. Petitioner's Justification: This deviation has been granted for many projects where the roads will remain private. There is adequate width in a 40-foot right-of-way for a private, local road to allow for all necessary utilities, sidewalks, and travel lanes. A cross-section has been provided in support of this deviation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant held two NIMs for this petition. The first NIM was held on May 5, 2021, at New Hope Ministries located at 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, Florida. There were five attendees at the NIM. The applicant committed to not having rental residential units. At the transmittal hearing for the companion GMPA, an affordable rental housing component was introduced. Therefore, a second NIM was held on December 7, 2021, at the same location. There were three attendees at the NIM, two in person and one via zoom. Please see Attachment B-1: NIM Summary 1 and Attachment B-2: NIM Summary 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on March 10, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA- PL20200000114, Collier Blvd Lord’s Way MPUD to the BCC with a recommendation of approval 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD, PUDA-PL20200000114 March 28, 2022 Page 20 of 20 subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA petition PL20200000115, Collier Blvd Lord’s Way Subdistrict GMPA. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B-1: NIM Summary 1 Attachment B-2: NIM Summary 2 Attachment C: Application 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Collier Blvd Lord's Way 3-28-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) [20-CPS-02056/1707508/1]206 First Assembly Ministries PL20200000114 3/21/22 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added. 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2022 -_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 08-41, THE FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS MPUD, AS AMENDED, TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE MPUD TO COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD’S WAY MPUD; TO REMOVE THE DAY CARE USE AND ALLOW THE CHURCH USE AS AN INTERIM USE FOR UP TO 5 YEARS; TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 306 UNITS TO 690 UNITS WITH 76 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS; AND TO REALLOCATE THE USES, REVISE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE PUD MASTER PLAN FOR THE PUD PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 69± ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BLVD. (C.R. 951) AND HACIENDA LAKES PARKWAY FORMERLY LORD’S WAY, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200000114] WHEREAS, on July 22, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 08-41, the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (the “MPUD); and WHEREAS, the MPUD was subsequently amended; and WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. representing Lord’s Way Apartments, LLC and 3805 TLW, LLC, have petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend Ordinance No. 08-41, as amended, the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO THE MPUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 08-41, THE FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS MPUD 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) [20-CPS-02056/1707508/1]206 First Assembly Ministries PL20200000114 3/21/22 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added. 2 of 2 The MPUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 08-41, as Exhibits A through G is hereby amended in accordance with revised Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION SIX: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2022-____ becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ______day of __________________, 2022. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _________________________ By: _________________________________ Deputy Clerk William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman Approved as to form and legality: _________________________________ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A – List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B – Development Standards Exhibit C – Master Plan Exhibit C1 – ROW Section Exhibit C2 – MPUD Plan and Section Exhibit D – Legal Description Exhibit E – List of Deviations Exhibit F – List of Developer Commitments HFAC 3-21-22 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 1 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx EXHIBIT A FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CAMPUS COLLIER BLVD. LORD’S WAY MPUD CHURCH RELATED USES AND DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY I. CHURCH RELATED PERMITTED USES (TRACTS A-E) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Collier Blvd. Lord’s Way MPUD will include a mixture of residential dwelling types and a communications tower land uses for religious, community social services, and residential uses in a campus-type setting. This wide mixture of land uses is also intended to provide some services on-site, which will provide convenience for the many non-mobile residents and minimize traffic generation from the campus. The key facilities at build-out will include a maximum of: an auditorium for predominantly church use with 2200 seats, a chapel with 200 seats, and a private school for 300 students in elementary and secondary schools or Bible College, a care unit facility with 249 care beds and a facility for 300 day care units 690 multifamily dwelling units and/or single-family attached units; and/or an assisted living facility, as well as an existing communications tower. The care beds will be located in the educational complex on Tract A (183), 66 beds in the Rehabilitation Center on Tract A and 20 beds will be located in the multi-family/multi-purpose facility on Tract A until such time as the rehabilitation center on Tract A is completed. Tracts B & D are intended for uses accessory to the principal use of residential development, such as water management, access, parking, or landscaping. Tract B coincides with an existing FPL easement and permitted land uses are therefore limited. Tract D delineates existing and proposed lakes. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. II. PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES AND SIC CODES: (TRACTS A, A-1, & CE) Land Use Type Tract 1. Religious organizations (Group 8661, limited to churches and religious organizations) A 2. Private elementary and secondary schools (Group 8211, limited to vocational high school and colleges, universities and professional schools) (Group 8221, limited to theological seminaries). A 3. Residential care units (Group 8361 – maximum of 249 beds, limited to: a) Alcoholism rehabilitation centers, residential, with health care incidental; b) Drug rehabilitation centers, residential, with health care incidental; c) Homes for children, with health care incidental; and d) Homes for destitute Men and Women). A 4. Child daycare services (Group 8351, limited to child care centers). A 5. Rehabilitative service center specialty outpatient facilities, not classified elsewhere (Group 8093, limited to outpatient detoxification Centers*). A 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 2 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx a) Job training (Group 8331, limited to Job Training). A, C b) Individual and family social services (Group 8322, limited to: 1) adult day care centers; 2) counseling centers; and 3) hotlines). A c) Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric (Group 8069, limited to: 1) alcoholism rehabilitation hospital; and 2) drug addiction rehabilitation hospital). A d) Social services – not classified elsewhere (Group 8399, limited to social service information exchange e.g., alcoholism, drug addiction). A 1. Single-family attached or multiple family dwellings A, A-1, C 2. Nursing homes, independent living facilities or assisted living facilities (ALF) pursuant to F.S. § 400.402 and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C., family care facilities, group care facilities (category I) limited to persons 55 and over; care units, A, A-1, C and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to F.S. § 651 and ch. 4-193 F.A.C. all subject to LDC section 5.05.04 excluding homeless shelters, foster care facilities, offender halfway houses, and substance abuse care facilities (hereinafter “Group Housing”). 3. Communications tower (Group 4832 and 4833, limited to one only) C 6. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). *Principally for on-site residents only, however, an incidental component of the program is to allow past program residents or social service agency referrals to attend programs comprising no more than 10% of program participants. III. USES AND STRUCTURES (TRACTS B & D) 1. Parking, landscaping, cross-access easements B within FPL right-of-way, subject to FPL approval. 2. Drainage facilities. B, D B. IV. ACCESSORY USES AND SIC CODES (TRACTS A, A-1 & C-D) Accessory uses are uses that are only accessory to permitted religious or institutional uses, temporary or periodic in nature. Accessory uses shall be of a lesser area than the size of the principal uses in which they are located. Accessory uses are principally for on-site residents only, however, an incidental component of the program is to allow past program residents or social service agency referrals to attend programs comprising no more than 10% of program participants. Accessory uses shall principally generate their activity from the principal permitted uses for the subject property, including their traffic’s trip generation so as to minimize external impacts to adjacent properties and the external roadway network. Uses accessory to a permitted principal use may be located on Tract C in support of principal uses on Tracts A and A-1. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 3 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx Land Use Type Tract 1. Coin-operated laundries (Group 7215, limited to coin-operated laundries). A, C 2. Radio broadcasting stations and tower (church use) (Group 4832, limited to one only). A, C 3. Television broadcasting station and tower (church use) (Group 4833, limited to one only). A, C 4. Book stores for church and school only (Group 5942, limited to a maximum of two). A 5. Cemetery, including mausoleum, accessory to the church use only. A 6. Christian memorial per MPUD Master Plan. A 7. Guard house/campus security office. A 8. Cafeterias that are not soup kitchens (shall be an integral part of a principal use for on-site residents and visitors utilizing permitted principal uses on the campus only). A 9. Help supply services for residents only (Group 7363, limited to labor pool only and limited to residents only). A 10. Overnight parking for visitors in recreational vehicles or busses (see Exhibit B, Table IV.C.) C 11. 1. Recreational facilities for residents of the MPUD, including but not limited to: gymnasiums, football fields, baseball fields, soccer fields, basketball courts, A, A-1, B, C, D swimming pools, tennis courts, shuffle board courts, waterways for canoeing, gazebo, boat/fishing docks and boardwalks, playgrounds. 12. Grassed parking area for overflow parking within FPL right-of-way. B 13. Administrative services for principal uses including offices, meeting and conference rooms for the church and rehabilitative center. A 14. Ten multi-family units for church employees in the multi-family/multi-purpose building. A 15. Motor Vehicle Dealers (Group 5211, with sales limited to used vehicles that have been repaired in conjunction with the Rehabilitation Center use on site, and further limited as shown in Table IV.D. C 16. Recreational Vehicle Dealers (Group 5561, with sales limited to used recreational vehicles that have been repaired in conjunction with the Rehabilitation Center use on site, and further limited as shown in Table IV.D. C 2. Detached parking garages A, A-1, C 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 4 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 3. Water management facilities A, A-1, C 17. 4. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. CV. PRESERVE SUBDISTRICT USES AND STRUCTURES (TRACT E) No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected, altered or used, or lands used in whole or part other than the following: A. Permitted Uses and Structures: 1. Passive recreation areas. 2. Water management facilities in wetlands and water management structures. 3. Mitigation areas. 4. Boardwalks and trails. 5. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. IIVI. RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES (TRACT G) No building, structure or part thereof located on Tract G, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than shown below: A. PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES: 1. Multiple-family dwellings. 2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the LDC. B. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES: 1. Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development, including but not limited to a walk path, docks, community center building and office, pool and playgrounds. 2. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the residential permitted uses within this MPUD Ordinance including garages, detached and attached, swimming pools, boat docks recreational buildings, which may include daycare services for children who reside in the community, and a tot lot for children. 3. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the LDC. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 5 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx C. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY: A maximum of 296 multi-family units are allowed on Tract G. IIIVII. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT (TRACT F) Use of this tract is limited to rights-of-way. IV. PROHIBITED USES Soup kitchens shall be a prohibited principal and accessory use throughout this entire MPUD Zoning District. VIII. INTERIM USE Religious organizations (Group 8661, limited to churches and religious organizations) shall be permitted to continue within Tract A for a time not to exceed 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance or until such time that a Site Development Plan has been approved for the development of residential units within Tract A, whichever occurs first. After five years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, or when a SDP has been approved for the residential development within Tract A, the identified religious organization use shall cease and is no longer deemed permitted. Further, if the structure of the religious organization is to be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 6 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx EXHIBIT B FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CAMPUS COLLIER BLVD. LORD’S WAY MPUD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LISTING OF TABLES TABLE I - RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES, FOR TRACT G 2 TABLE II - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STUCTURES, FOR TRACT G 3 TABLE III - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CHURCH RELATED PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES, FOR TRACTS A, A-1, B, C 4 TABLE IV - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CHURCH RELATED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FOR TRACTS A, A-1, B, C 5 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 7 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx TABLE I RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES For Tract G A. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS* MINIMUM FRONT YARD 25 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD NONE, AS LONG AS MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES IS MET MINIMUM REAR YARD 25 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 800 SQUARE FEET PER DWELLING UNIT MINIMUM SETBACK FROM NORTHERN, AND EASTERN MPUD BOUNDARY 35 FEET PLUS ONE FOOT FOR EACH FOOT OF BUILDING HEIGHT OVER 35 FEET MINIMUM SETBACK FROM SOUTHERN MPUD BOUNDARY 35 FEET PLUS ONE FOOT FOR EACH FOOT OF BUILDING HEIGHT OVER 35 FEET, NOT TO EXCEED 50 FEET MINIMUM YARD FROM INTERNAL PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREAS 10 FEET UNLESS ATTACHED TO CARPORTS, GARAGES OR PORTICOS, OR GARAGES, WHETHER ATTACHED OR DETACHED* MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES GREATER THAN 20 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURES --- FOUR STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 52 FEET AS ZONED AND NOT TO EXCEED 56 FEET ACTUAL MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES 20 FEET * This standard does not apply to travel ways that include public rights-of-way but may include parking areas and driveways. See Exhibit B1 typical sketch for distance of principal uses, carports, garages or porticos from travel ways. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, residential cooperative and/or homeowners’ association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. B. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY A maximum of 296 multi-family units are allowed on Tract G. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 8 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx TABLE II RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STUCTURES For Tract G A. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MINIMUM FRONT YARD 20 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD NONE AS LONG AS MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES IS MET MINIMUM REAR YARD 20 FEET DISTANCE FROM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE 20 FEET OR 10 FEET FOR CARPORTS OR DETACHED GARAGES MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT TWO STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 25 FEET AS ZONED AND NOT TO EXCEED 35 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHTS MINIMUM SETBACK FROM MPUD BOUNDARY 25 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM INTERNAL PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREAS* 10 FEET UNLESS ATTACHED TO CARPORTS OR GARAGES, WHETHER ATTACHED OR DETACHED* MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES 20 FEET * See Exhibit B1 depicting location of carport areas adjacent to vehicular use area/travel ways. * Does not apply to public right of way. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 9 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx TABLE III DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES For Tracts A, A-1, B, C A. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM FLOOR AREA FOR CARE UNITS 275 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS 700 600 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM SETBACK FROM NORTHERN, and SOUTHERN (LORD’S WAY) AND EASTERN MPUD BOUNDARY 35 FEET PLUS ONE FOOT OF SETBACK FOR EACH FOOT OF ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT OVER 35 FEET * MINIMUM SETBACK FROM WESTERN MPUD BOUNDARY (CR 951) 100 FEET MINIMUM FRONT YARD (INTERNAL ROADWAYS) 20 100 FEET ALONG CR 951, 35 FEET ALONG THE LORD’S WAY AND 25 FEET ELSEWHERE MINIMUM SETBACK FOR MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS ON TRACTS A-1 & C FROM TRACT BOUNDARY WITH TRACT G 15 FEET FOR A 2-STORY BUILDING 25 FEET FOR A 3-STORY BUILDING 35 FEET FOR A 4-STORY BUILDING MINIMUM REAR YARD 5 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD NONE AS LONG AS DISTANCES BETWEEN STRUCTURES ARE MET MINIMUM YARD DISTANCE FROM INTERNAL PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREAS** 10 FEET (0’ WHEN PAVED AREAS CONNECT TO GARAGES ATTACHED TO BUILDING) * MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES GREATER THAN 20 10’ FOR TWO STORY STRUCTURES, 15’ FOR THREE STORIES AND 20’ FOR FOUR STORIES OR HIGHER MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FIVE FOUR STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 67 52 FEET AS ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT AND NOT TO EXCEED 74 56 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND GROUP HOUSING. CHURCH, EDUCATION FACILITY AND CARE UNITS. ALL OTHERS- THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 40 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 10 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx * Excludes public right of way ** Vehicle use defined as drive aisle. FEET ZONED HEIGHT AND NOT TO EXCEED 45 FEET ACTUAL HEIGHT. THE HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF THE STEEPLE OF THE WORSHIP CENTER SHALL NOT EXCEED104 FEET. SETBACK RADIO COMMUNICATIONS TOWER SHALL BE SEPARATED A MINIMUM OF ITS FALL ZONE RADIUS (BASED ON THE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE) OF 170 FEET FROM ANY HABITABLE STRUCTURE. 20’ SEPARATION FROM NON-HABITABLE STRUCTURES INCLUDING PARKING GARAGES, AMENITY BUILDINGS OR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES. HEIGHT – COMMUNICATIONS TOWER 170 FEET PRESERVE AREA 25 FEET SPECIAL MINIMUM SETBACK FOR THE MULTI- FAMILY/MULTI- PURPOSE BLDG. ON TRACT A EAST OF FPL EASEMENT 3 FEET FROM TRACT BOUNDARY; AND NO STRUCTURE IN THAT PORTION OF TRACT A LOCATED EAST OF THE FPL EASEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 60 FEET OF ANY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE (SEE ALSO EXHIBIT B- 1 DEPICTING THE MULTI-FAMILY/MULTI- PURPOSE BUILDING SETBACK) LAKE SETBACK 20 FEET 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 11 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx TABLE IV DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STUCTURES CHURCH RELATED USES For TRACTS A, A-1, B, C A. *Fishing docks shall not intrude into the landscape buffer. **The monument honoring the National Christian Armed Forces will have a maximum height of thirty- five (35) feet and it shall be located no closer than 50 feet from the western edge of this MPUD on the Master Plan. B. SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS Accessory uses shall have no signage visible from The Lord’s Way or CR 951 and signage shall only be permitted at entries to their respective buildings with on-premise directional signs. No advertising shall be permitted for accessory uses other than with materials directly associated with principal uses, such as ACCESSORY STRUCTURES CHURCH RELATED USES * MINIMUM FRONT YARD 25 FEET ALONG THE LORD’S WAY; 50 FEET ALONG CR 951 EXCEPT FOR FISHING DOCKS * SAME AS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM SIDE YARD SAME AS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM REAR YARD 20 5 FEET DISTANCE FROM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE 20 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT TWO STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 30 FEET ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT AND NOT TO EXCEED 35 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT PRESERVE AREA SETBACK 10 FEET MINIMUM SETBACK FROM MPUD BOUNDARY 25 20 FEET OR FRONT YARD SETBACK, WHICHEVER IS GREATER MINIMUM SETBACK FOR STRUCTURES ON TRACTS A-1 & C FROM TRACT BOUNDARY WITH TRACT G 15 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES 20 FEET 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 12 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx church bulletins, flyers and circulars available to residents, employees, members, program participants and patrons of the principal uses (see also Exhibit A pertaining to accessory uses). C. PARKING OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (RV’S) Parking for RV vehicles is limited to Tracts A and C only and there shall be no more than three consecutive night stays permitted for each vehicle. A maximum of 25 RVs may be parked at any one time. This parking area shall be only for self-contained vehicles that include sanitary facilities. The developer shall provide a dump station on site for use of residents only that is sufficient to serve the maximum number of RVs that may be parked at one time. D. SALE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (RV’S) AND USED CARS Combined sales of RVs and used cars shall be limited to a maximum of 10 sales per year. A maximum of 3 vehicles may be stored or held for sale at any one time on Tract C at the repair site. No vehicles shall be stored on any other Tract. All storage, repairs and sales must be conducted inside a fully enclosed structure limited to Tract C only. Compliance with this provision shall be submitted as part of the annual PUD Monitoring Report. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 13 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 9.A.4.bPacket Pg. 353Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Page 14 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 9.A.4.bPacket Pg. 354Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Page 15 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 9.A.4.bPacket Pg. 355Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Page 16 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 9.A.4.bPacket Pg. 356Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Page 17 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 9.A.4.bPacket Pg. 357Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Page 18 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S 00°49'12" W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,338.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN N 87°28'39" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,593.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N 87°28'39" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 745.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN S 00°48'18" W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,341.33 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN S 87°31'14" W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 883.82 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00°48'13" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 213.59 FEET; THENCE RUN N 22°19'04" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 94.95 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00°18'59" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 216.38 FEET; THENCE RUN N 87°28'12" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 172.03 FEET; THENCE RUN N 66°03'38" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00°32'14" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 441.42 FEET; THENCE RUN S 87°28'12" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 80.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N 02°31'00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 335.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO, (AS DESCRIBED IN AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION TITLE COMMITMENT FILE NO.: 19042574 DEH, EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 5, 2019 AT 8:00 AM) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 19 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S 00°49'12" W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,338.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN N 87°28'39" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,593.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N 87°28'39" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 745.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN S 00°48'18" W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,341.33 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN S 87°31'14" W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 883.82 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00°48'13" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 213.59 FEET; THENCE RUN N 22°19'04" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 94.95 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00°18'59" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 216.38 FEET; THENCE RUN N 87°28'12" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 172.03 FEET; THENCE RUN N 66°03'38" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00°32'14" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 441.42 FEET; THENCE RUN S 87°28'12" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 80.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N 02°31'00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 335.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL CONTAINS 2,996,547.13 SQUARE FEET, OR 68.79 ACRES, MORE OR LESS 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 20 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (AS FURNISHED BY CLIENT) THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, ALL SITUATED AND LYING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOTES: THIS PROPERTY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS BEING S.00º49’12”W. (STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLORIDA EAST ZONE, 83/90) ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON THIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN LOCATED HEREON AS SHOWN. ABOVE GROUND INDICATORS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES EXISTING ON THIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN LOCATED HEREON AS SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED ON THIS SURVEY. ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON OR ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. ABSTRACT OF TITLE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY SURVEYOR. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PROPERTY AREA: 68.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CERTIFIED TO: FLORIDA COMMUNITY BANK FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION TIB BANK OF THE KEYS FIRST TITLE AND ABSTRACT, INC. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 21 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx EXHIBIT E FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS COLLIER BLVD. LORD’S WAY MPUD REZONE LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) 1. Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, Buffer Requirements, which requires a 20 foot wide Type D buffer along The Lord’s Way and Collier Boulevard, to allow this the perimeter buffers along The Lord’s Way and Collier Boulevard to be reduced from 20 feet to 10 feet in width along Tract G, the Multi-Family Tract. If a wall or fence is installed along the southern property boundary, it shall be located in the middle of the landscape buffer. This deviation will also allow the existing 10 foot wide buffer to remain on Tract A adjacent to The Lord’s Way prior to the widening of The Lord’s Way and to allow this Type D buffer to remain 10 feet in width after the widening of The Lord’s Way and to be relocated to the north of the existing sidewalk. The plantings in the 10 foot Type D buffer area on Tract A shall be located just to the north of the sidewalk. The 10 foot buffer along the Lords Way shall be located north of the existing 30 foot ROW easement and north of a 10 foot ROW reservation described in Section 3A of Exhibit F of the PUD document. No buffer shall be required on the northern or western boundary along preserve Tract E. (See Exhibit I, The Lord’s Way Typical Cross Sections for Tract A and G.) 2. Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.C.16.b.i, to allow a off-site premises sign in the southwest corner of the subject property on Tract A. The deviation is to exceed the maximum area of 12 square feet to allow the off-site premise sign to be a maximum size of 32square feet as an addition to the existing sign. (See MPUD Master Plan and Exhibit G depicting proposed sign detail.) WITHDRAWN 3.A. Deviation No. 3A seeks relief from LDC Section 05.06.04.C.1.c, that allows a maximum sign area of 80 square feet. The deviation is to allow a maximum size of 132 square feet in area. The sign is currently 100 feet in area. (See Exhibit G for sign detail and also Deviation No. 2.) 3B. Deviation No. 3B seeks relief from LDC Section 05.06.04.C.16.b.ii., that limits the height of the sign to 8 feet above the lowest center grade of the arterial roadway and to allow the existing sign to remain 20 feet in height. 3C. Deviation No. 3C seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.C.1.a, that limits the size of signs to 15 feet to allow the existing 20 foot tall sign to remain. 3.A. Deviation No. 3A seeks relief from LDC section 5.06.04 G.1., which permits off-premises directional signs in nonresidential and agricultural zoning districts, to allow for one off- premises directional sign within a residential district, that will provide signage for developments located along The Lord’s Way, including but not limited to the Hacienda 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 22 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx Lakes MPUD, Sapphire Cove (Lord’s Way 30 PUD), and Milano Lakes (Tract G of this PUD). 3.B. Deviation No. 3B seeks relief from LDC section 5.06.04 G.2.a., which limits the size of an off-premises directional sign to no more than 12 square feet in area, to allow an off- premises directional sign at a maximum sign face area of 128 square feet (64 square feet on each side). 3.C. Deviation No. 3C seeks relief from LDC section 5.06.04 G.2.b., which limits the height of off-premises directional signs to 8 feet in height, measured above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location, to allow a maximum height of 10 feet. 3.D. Deviation No. 3D seeks relief from LDC section 5.06.04 G.2.e. Off-premises directional signs, which requires an off-site premises directional sign be located no more than 1,000 feet from the building, structure, or use for which the sign is displayed, to allow the one off-premises sign on Tract A to serve other communities or users along The Lord’s Way regardless of distance, including but not limited to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, Sapphire Cove (Lord’s Way 30 PUD), and Milano Lakes (Tract G of this PUD). 4A. Deviation No. 4A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.C.16.b.v, which requires an off-site premise sign be located within 1,000 feet of the intersection of the roadway to allow the sign to be 1,400 feet from the property it serves on Tract G. 4. 4B. Deviation No. 4B4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements to allow relief from the requirement that a 6 foot wide sidewalk and bike lane be provided along The Lord’s Way (a requirement for The Lord’s Way upon becoming an arterial or collector roadway in the future). The deviation is to allow the northerly most existing 5 7 foot wide sidewalk to remain west of the existing entrance into First Assembly Ministries on Tract A-1 to satisfy the pedestrian access requirements of LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1. This deviation will also allow a 5 foot wide sidewalk to be constructed within a five foot easement area on Tract G, the multi-family tract, to satisfy this LDC requirement. (See also Exhibit I, The Lords Way Typical Cross Sections.) 5. 4C. Deviation No. 4C5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.13, Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements which requires a minimum 12 foot wide pathway6 foot wide sidewalk and bike lane along C.R. 951, an arterial roadway, to allow for a new 610 foot sidewalk and bike lane pathway to be constructed off-site of the PUD and within the canal to replace an existing 7 foot wide sidewalk along a portion of the C.R. 951 road frontage. on property belonging to First Assembly Ministries to satisfy this requirement or by providing money in lieu of providing a sidewalk. A connection Connections will be provided from the sidewalk on The Lord’s Way to the sidewalk which the County has will constructed on C.R. 951 east of the canal at the intersection of The Lord’s Way and C.R. 951, from the County constructed sidewalk to the proposed 6 10 foot sidewalk pathway and from the proposed 610 foot pathway sidewalk to the existing 7 foot sidewalk on Tract E. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 23 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 56. Deviation No. 56 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.B, Street System Requirements, which requires that layout of all developments to be coordinated with surrounding properties to provide interconnections. The deviation is to allow private access to both the church campus and multi-family development Tract G to be private entrances and to not require interconnections between the two uses from Tract G to the rest of the PUD. A provision has been made for a potential future access from Tract G to the east. 6 7. Deviation No. 6 7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1, Group Housing which requires a maximum floor area ratio that shall not exceed 0.45 for care units, to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.60 for group housing. The deviation is to allow the care units to be developed within the 368,000 square feet of floor area for all uses. 6A8. Deviation No. 6A8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.3.b, Group Housing, that requires 0.75 parking space per assisted living unit, to allow 0.75 parking space per 10 care units. 7. Deviation No. 7 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.06.02.D.4 and 5.03.02.E.3, pertaining to minimum landscape buffer width and minimum wall setback, respectively. The LDC requires that a 15 foot wide Type B landscape buffer and a 10 foot wide Type A landscape buffers to be provided along the property boundary between Tract G, the multi-family tract, and Tracts A and C of First Assembly Ministries’ campus, with the 15 foot Type B buffer to be provided for the more intensive use (i.e., on Tracts A and C) and the 10 foot Type A buffer to be provided for the less intensive use (i.e., on Tract G). The LDC also requires that the non-residential use provide a minimum 6 foot high concrete (precast or masonry) wall a minimum of 6 feet from the residential zoning district boundary (i.e., at least 6 feet inside Tracts A and C). The LDC allows for reductions in required buffer widths to a minimum width of 10 feet provided that compensating increases in width are made elsewhere in the buffer. The deviation is to locate the buffers within platted easements as depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan, departing in places from the property line and with portions of either buffer encroaching onto an adjacent tract(s). Areas depicted in the legend represent reductions in buffer width and include compensating increases in buffer width. Portions of the 10 foot Type A buffer on Tract G – Phase 2 (i.e., adjacent to Celebration Boulevard, the existing entry road into Tract A) are shown with a reduction to less than 10 feet, severed in some places, due to the encroachment of proposed impervious improvements. The required wall shall be located a minimum of 6 feet from the residential side of the 15 foot Type B buffer. 8. Deviation No. 8 seeks relief to LDC Section 4.06.02.C, Table 2.4, which requires buffering internal to uses within Tracts A and C. The deviation is to allow no buffering between uses internal to Tracts A and C. See also Deviation No. 7 that provides buffering between Tracts A and C. 9. Deviation No. 9 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01, Private Roadway Width, which requires a 60-foot right-of-way width for local roads, to allow that private roadways shall have a minimum 40-foot right-of-way width. 9. Deviation No. 9 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G., Table 17, Parking Spaces Required which requires 3 parking spaces for each 7 seats in the chapel or assembly area, 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 24 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx to allow a reduction of this standard to a minimum of 1 space for each 4 seats that is typically only for the expansion allowed due to congregational growth so as to allow this standard to apply only to previously approved church-related structures in existence prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Any future church-related parking area will require the standard of 3 parking spaces for 7 seats. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 25 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx EXHIBIT F FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CAMPUS COLLIER BLVD. LORD’S WAY MPUD REZONE LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. GENERAL A. Development of the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Collier Blvd. Lord’s Way MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections and parts of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan (SDP), excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. B. Two entities (hereinafter the Managing Entities) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and these entities shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is 3805 TLW, LLC for Tracts A-F and 3713 Milano Lakes (FL) Owner, LLC, for Tract G. Each Managing Entity shall be responsible for PUD monitoring only within the Tract(s) it owns. Should either Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then they must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity(ies) shall become the Managing Entity(ies). As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entities shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgment of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entities are no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. C. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING GMP COMMITMENTS FOR TRACT G A. A minimum of 147 of the 296 affordable-workforce and market rate housing units, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 26 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx essential services in Collier County. Essential services personnel (ESP) is defined as follows: Those individuals employed in the community as teachers, educators, other school district employees, community college and university employees, police and fire personnel, health care personnel, skilled building trades personnel (as listed in the U.S. Department of Labor, General Decision No. FL 150012, dated 3/20/2015, for building construction in Collier County, Florida, as may be amended or superseded from time to time), and government employees. The units will be offered, for sale or for rent, pursuant to the provisions of the approved ESP Housing Agreement between the Developer and the County. In addition, to the requirements of the approved ESP Housing Agreement, the developer shall comply with the following commitments upon approval of the SDP for Tract G, the multi -family tract. B. The developer of Tract G, the multi-family tract, shall comply with one or more of the following: i. The Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus provisions in the LDC, in effect as of February 19, 2008, the date of adoption of the GMP provisions affecting the subject property; or, ii. State law applicable to the designation as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida. 1.) the developer shall provide a minimum of 80 ESP dwelling units comprised of a minimum of 10 dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income in Collier County, and 2.) a minimum of 70 dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income for Collier County; or, iii. The developer shall enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable-workforce and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to ESP, persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County. Such agreement shall be in effect for not less than 15 years. Such an agreement shall be in effect for not less than 15 years. Such an agreement shall provide that a minimum of 35 dwelling units shall be provided for those earning no more than 150% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of 25 dwelling units shall be provided for tho se earning no more than 80% of the median income of Collier County. C. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable-workforce housing (AWH) dwelling units. D. The maximum primary occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non-church-related dwelling units shall be as follows: 1. One bedroom units – three occupants. 2. Two bedroom units-five occupants. 3. Three bedroom units-seven occupants. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 27 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx E.. The number of one-bedroom units shall be limited to no more than 20 percent of the total number of units provided. F. A minimum of 75 of the required parking spaces shall be met via enclosed garages. G. Residential development on Tract G shall conform with the following design standards: 1. Amenities. The following amenities shall be provided in association with any residential development: a. Resort-style swimming pool; b. Clubhouse; c. Outdoor barbeque facilities; d. Fitness center; e. Dog park; f. Children’s playground area/tot lot; g. Tennis court or bocce ball court or pickleball court; h. Gated entry; and i. On-site property management if developed as a rental community. 2. Construction. The following shall be required: a. Concrete Masonry Unit construction, or concrete construction, and stucco; b. Cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent (asphalt shingles prohibited); c. Minimum 9-foot ceiling heights within first floor of units; and d. Paver accents at project entry. 3. AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITMENTS FOR TRACTS A and A-1 A. For the additional 384 affordable and market rate housing units on Tracts A and A-1 of the Collier Boulevard/Lord’s Way MPUD, the project shall comply with the following: 1) Seventy-six units will be designated for rental to households whose incomes are between 80% and 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation. OR - 2) Seventy-six units will be designated for sale to households whose initial certified incomes are between 80%-120% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and affordability for all units sold to eligible households will be secured through the execution of a lien in accordance with Chapter 2.06.04 of the LDC between Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the buyer to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 28 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx B. No additional units will be allocated to Tract G of the MPUD. 34. TRANSPORTATION A. Approximately 40 50 feet on Tract A and A-1 up to the existing 7 foot wide sidewalk shall be reserved along the southern portion of this MPUD for Collier County for an east/west public right-of-way corridor, a portion of which currently includes a 30 foot easement for The Lord’s Way. The right-of-way shall be dedicated to Collier County in fee simple title and free of any liens and encumbrances upon request by Collier County based upon a demonstrated need for the roadway. Incorporation into the Collier County Capital Improvement Element shall constitute demonstrated need. The right-of-way shall be dedicated at no cost to the County. The right-of-way shall be dedicated to Collier County within 120 days of such demonstrated need. (See also Exhibit C-1 and Tract F on the MPUD Master Plan.) B. Forty (40) feet on Tract G shall be reserved along the southern portion of this MPUD for Collier County for an east/west public right-of-way corridor, a portion of which currently includes a 30’ easement for The Lord’s Way. The public right- of-way corridor shall include a 10’ multiuse pathway on the north side of the roadway to be which has been constructed by an entity other than Collier County. The public right-of-way area shall be dedicated to Collier County in fee simple title and free of any liens and encumbrances upon request by Collier County. The right- of-way shall be dedicated at no cost to the County. The right-of-way shall be dedicated to Collier County within 120 days of request by Collier County. C. Signalization at the Collier Boulevard/The Lord’s Way intersection shall be provided when warranted and a fair share contribution shall be provided by the developer owner of this MPUD or its successors. D. The right-of-way reservation for The Lord’s Way shall satisfy the developer’s mitigation requirements pursuant to Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP so the project can be found consistent with the GMP. (See also Exhibit C-1, The Lord’s Way Typical Cross Sections for Tracts A and G.) The mitigation will not alter the phasing requirement set forth in Exhibit F.3.DE. E. Residential development for Tract G shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to 147 dwelling units and 10 church-related dwelling units and will commence upon SDP approval. Phase Two development will permit construction of the remaining 149 units within Tract G for any prospective property owner, plus any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. F. The existing throat length on Tract A-1 shall remain the same after the widening of The Lord’s Way and the gatehouse shall remain in its present location. G. A sidewalk interconnection shall be required between Tracts A-1 and G in the vicinity of The Lord’s Way and church gatehouse. (See MPUD Master Plan.) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 29 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx H. The cost of any (potential, future) turn lanes onto The Lord’s Way created to serve this development shall be borne by the developer, its successors, or assigns. This commitment shall remain valid after such time that The Lord’s Way has been publicly dedicated. I. A 5 foot sidewalk will be constructed within the 5 foot easement dedicated to Collier County along The Lord’s Way on Tract G, the multi-family tract. The existing 7 foot sidewalk on Tract A shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy pedestrian access requirements on the church’s property. (See also Exhibit E.7.) J. H. The developer owner of Tract A and A-1 shall be responsible for relocating landscaping from the existing buffer to the new buffer north of the existing sidewalk 10 foot ROW reservation along the Lord’s Way at no cost to the County and with no claims for any future disruption to the landscaping in the event of The Lord’s Way widening. I. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 330 two- way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 45. LANDSCAPE/BUFFERING/WALL REQUIREMENTS A. The plantings within the Type D buffer area on Tract G shall consist of trees on 15 foot centers. This provision is designed to implement GMP provisions pertaining to enhanced landscaping in the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict. B. When the existing 10 foot buffer is relocated on the south boundary of Tract A and A-1 by owner, it shall consist of trees on 15 foot centers. This provision is designed to implement GMP provisions pertaining to enhanced landscaping in the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict. C. A continuously running 6-foot high concrete wall shall be provided by owner by the developers of each respective portion of the site along the entire western boundary of Tract G. Said wall must be in place prior to the issuance of the first issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in Tract G. D. The owner of Tract A shall install an alternative Type D landscape buffer along the western PUD boundary adjacent to County Road 951/Collier Boulevard (see Exhibit E. Deviation No. 1) and in conformance with the minimum specifications depicted in Exhibit C-2. E. The plantings within the 10-foot-wide Type A buffer to be provided on Tracts A-1 and C adjacent to Tract G shall consist of trees on 25 foot centers. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 30 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 56. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES A tot lot shall be provided on Tract G for children 2 to 12 years of age, which meets ASTM standards. The tot lot shall be constructed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the first multi-family building. 6. USE LIMITATIONS The rehabilitation facility and associated uses shall not provide housing, food service or any other services to sexual predators or pedophiles. 7. SECURITY The developer shall provide twenty-four (24) hour security services for the rehabilitation facility and associated uses at all times. 8. 7. PLANNING A. The developer owner, its successor or assignee, shall provide to any prospective resident an actual and recorded notice with respect to the noise that is associated with the Swamp Buggy Races located at 8250 Collier Boulevard, Naples, Florida, within the Florida Sports Park (within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD) as it relates to the location of this PUD. The notice shall disclose that the Florida Sports Park and Swamp Buggy operations regularly generate traffic, and noise which may be heard on the First Assembly Ministries subject property, both during the day and into the evening, including, but not limited to, noise from swamp buggy racing, tractor pulls, festivals, and music concerts. This statement must be presented to the resident prior to entering into any contract. B. The owner of any group housing, including a retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to the following operational standards for the units in the group housing, including, but not limited to, independent living units, assisted living units, or skilled nursing units: Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: i. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; ii. There shall be on-site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on-site, or catered; 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 31 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx iii. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents’ needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; iv. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; v. An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; vi. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; vii. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. 8. UTILITIES A. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. B. The developer will utilize the existing 10” water main on the east side of Celebration Boulevard for water service to Tracts A, A-1, B, and C, or else abandon it in accordance with the requirements of the latest Collier County Water-Sewer District standards. C. The franchised public utility companies will be granted access rights across but not utility rights within the supplemental County Utility Easements adjacent to the internal rights-of-way, as shown in the typical ROW section as depicted in Exhibit C-1. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) Page 32 of 32 H:\2019\2019076\WP\PUDA\3-11-2022\Collier Blvd Lords Way MPUD (PL-20200000114) (3-14-2022).docx 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 032122 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) 9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 373Attachment: Attachment B-1-NIM 1 Summary 5-5-21 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) 9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 374Attachment: Attachment B-1-NIM 1 Summary 5-5-21 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 375Attachment: Attachment B-2-NIM 2 Summary 12-7-21 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 376Attachment: Attachment B-2-NIM 2 Summary 12-7-21 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD) 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 377Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 378Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 379Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 380Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 381Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 382Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 383Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 384Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 385Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 386Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 387Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 388Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 389Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 390Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 391Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 392Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 393Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 394Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 395Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 396Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 397Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 398Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 399Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 400Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 401Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 402Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 403Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 404Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 405Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 406Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 407Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 408Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 409Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 410Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 411Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 412Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 413Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 414Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 415Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 416Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 417Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 418Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 419Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 420Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 421Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 422Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 423Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 424Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 425Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 426Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 427Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 428Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 429Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 430Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 431Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 432Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 433Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 434Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 435Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 436Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 437Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 438Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 439Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 440Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 441Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 442Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 443Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 444Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 445Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 446Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 447Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 448Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 449Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 450Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 451Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 452Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 453Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 454Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 455Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 456Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 457Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 458Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 459Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 460Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 461Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 462Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 463Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 464Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 465Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 466Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 467Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 468Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 469Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 470Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 471Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 472Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 473Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 474Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 475Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 476Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 477Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 478Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 479Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 480Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 481Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 482Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 483Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 484Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 485Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 486Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 487Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 488Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 489Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 490Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 491Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 492Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 493Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 494Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 495Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 496Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 497Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 498Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 499Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 500Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 501Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 502Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 503Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 504Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 505Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 506Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 507Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 508Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 509Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 510Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 511Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 512Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 513Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 514Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 515Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 516Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 517Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 518Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 519Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 520Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 521Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 522Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 523Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 524Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 525Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 526Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 527Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 528Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 529Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 530Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 531Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 532Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 533Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 534Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 535Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 536Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 537Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 538Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 539Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 540Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 541Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 542Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 543Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 544Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 545Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 546Attachment: Attachment C-Application 3-22-22 (21564 : PL20200000114-Collier Boulevard Lord's Way 04/07/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 11.A Item Summary: Updated Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Growth Management Plan consistency determination. Meeting Date: 04/07/2022 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/14/2022 11:52 AM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/14/2022 11:52 AM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 03/17/2022 5:30 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 03/22/2022 11:13 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 03/23/2022 8:23 AM Zoning James Sabo Additional Reviewer Completed 03/23/2022 9:54 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 03/24/2022 4:56 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/07/2022 9:00 AM 11.A Packet Pg. 547 CD-PL20220001219 Page 1 of 5 555 TO: FROM: STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: APRIL7, 2022 SUBJECT: PL20220001219 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION OBJECTIVE: For the CCPC to review the proposed updated Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan for consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2000, the BCC adopted Resolution 2000-82, which established the Bayshore/Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, with a finding of blight, as required by the Statutes. Chapter 163.360 of the Florida Statutes contains the provisions for the establishment of a Community Redevelopment Plan for an area that has been designated a C ommunity Redevelopment Area (CRA). On June 13, 2000, through Resolution 2000-181, Collier County adopted a Community Redevelopment Plan. The adopted Community Redevelopment Plan covers two component areas: Bayshore Gateway Triangle and Immokalee. On April 23, 2019, the BCC adopted the first amendment to the CRA Redevelopment Plan, amending section of the Plan pertaining to the Bayshore CRA, as well as recognizing the expansion of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area boundaries approved in 2004. Further 163.360 dictates, “the community redevelopment agency shall submit such plan to the local planning agency of the county or municipality for review and recommendations as to its conformity with the comprehensive plan for the development of the county or municipality as a whole.” Based upon the requirement of the Statute, the CCPC is being asked to review the proposed updated redevelopment plan against the GMP for consistency. The proposed changes focus upon the Immokalee CRA and provides for an updated vision and approach for the redevelopment of that component area. The proposed amendment amends Sections 1.1, 1.6 and 4 of the Redevelopment Plan pertaining to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area Redevelopment Plan. It should be noted that Section 4, which exclusively covers the Immokalee CRA is replacing in its entirety the existing Section 4. The proposed amendment of these Sections lays out a framework of goals, objectives, and strategies in support of the overall vision. The main goals include: 11.A.a Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Staff Report Immokalee CRA Redevelopment Plan (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) CD-PL20220001219 Page 2 of 5 555 1. Goal 4.2.1 Celebrating Culture: Create a Cultural Destination - Preserve and enhance the rich mix of cultures and heritage in Immokalee and embrace new ones as they are identified. 2. Goal 4.2.2 Economic Development - Strengthen the economic health of Immokalee. 3. Goal 4.2.3: Housing - Provide a mix of housing types and price points to allow for safe, high‐quality dwelling unit options in Immokalee. 4. Goal 4.2.4: Infrastructure - Maintain a high quality of life for all residents and visitors of Immokalee. 5. Goal 4.2.5 Implementation/Administration - Maximize resources through collaboration between County, State, and Federal agencies to achieve the CRA goals and objectives. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan also provides a program of projects and initiatives to carry out the framework and provides for opportunities for redevelopment within a framework map, which identifies eleven locations for potential redevelopment projects and improvements, (As displayed below). 11.A.a Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Staff Report Immokalee CRA Redevelopment Plan (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) CD-PL20220001219 Page 3 of 5 555 1. TIGER Grant – This area in the heart of the community will be transformed with sidewalk and lighting improvements funded through the Federal TIGER grant program. Once the project is completed there will be an opportunity to leverage these improvements by targeting housing initiatives in this area. 2. Civic Space/Community Facility – The CRA owns a 1.96-acre site located at the corner of Main Street and South Ninth Street. Originally purchased to create a public plaza similar to the Zocalo Park at the corner of First and Main, the site has remained vacant. Recent discussions have identified several approaches to developing the site to maximize public benefit including selling the property for commercial development; selling the property to develop a community service campus; or entering into a partnership with other public or private agencies to create a community center or community open space. 3. Lake Trafford Economic and Mobility Opportunity – Lake Trafford and Ann Olesky Park are considered a recreational jewel in the community. Lake Trafford Road that leads into the park is programed for sidewalk improvements except for the last 0.34 miles into the park. Environmental assessment is needed to determine if the pedestrian connection into the park can be completed. Coordination with the property owners surrounding the park also provides an opportunity to expand transit into the area and to expand commercial opportunities to expand eco-tourism in the area. 4. Pepper Ranch Recreational and Eco-Tourism – Pepper Ranch provides low impact recreational amenities to the public. Expansion of services and marketing the property for corporate retreats provides an opportunity to expand the eco-tourism into the area. 5. Housing & Medical Facilities Expansion – The Heritage Planned Unit Development approved in 1991 provides an opportunity to expand services and residential development in this northern section of Immokalee. The 346-acre site allows for a mix of commercial and residential units. Programmed improvements to State Road 29 will enhance this location’s viability for development, offering improved access for the local community, as well as Hendry and Lee Counties. 6. Roberts Ranch – A part of the Collier County Museum system, this historic 13-acre site is in the heart of Immokalee with easy access to Main Street. Originally home to cattleman Robert Roberts and his family, this historic site and museum (the longest running ranch in South Florida) provides visitors with a rare opportunity to experience daily working life on a Southwest Florida pioneer homestead and citrus grove from the early 1900s. This site provides an opportunity to host events that can attract tourists and residents. The site also provides an opportunity to link the agricultural sector to tourism by developing a farm to table venue. 7. Culinary Accelerator Expansion – Located within the Immokalee Regional Airport is The Florida Culinary Accelerator @ Immokalee, providing a state‐of‐the‐art commercial kitchen open to a membership base. Depending on the membership level, members may select from a range of customized hours and plans to prepare, cook, and package their culinary creations for distribution. The culinary accelerator’s goal is to support area chefs, farmers, and small food businesses to achieve their dreams of growing their food businesses and entering the competitive retail marketplace. One of the challenges that chefs, famers, and small food business face is finding a suitable space for startup businesses once they reach capacity at the accelerator. There is opportunity to expand this successful facility or expand services to address the next level of business expansion. 11.A.a Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Staff Report Immokalee CRA Redevelopment Plan (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) CD-PL20220001219 Page 4 of 5 555 8. First Street Corridor – Main entrance into Immokalee from coastal Collier, the roadway provides an opportunity to create an entrance into the community and to partner with the landowners along the street to provide needed commercial, residential, and recreational opportunities. The entrance to the ICRA is an opportunity for gateway branding. Additionally, there is an opportunity to connect Immokalee to surrounding areas within and beyond Collier County with the Paradise Coast Trail (PCT). The PCT is a Shared-Use Non-motorized (SUN) Trail. 9. Main Street – At the center of Immokalee, Main Street is a state roadway that has recently been improved for pedestrian access in 2021. A future “loop road” may eliminate the freight traffic that currently hinders the corridor from being designed and treated like a pedestrian oriented downtown corridor, and this could open the door for a transformation that allows more outdoor dining and neighborhood retail. Main Street also has opportunities as a central focal point for community branding efforts. 10. Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative – As outlined in Objective 4.2.3.2, this initiative focuses on creating a wholistic approach to neighborhood revitalization by including strategies for infrastructure, housing, and safety improvements. There are 12 neighborhoods identified on the Neighborhood Map. Two areas have emerged as opportunities based on current or budgeted public investment and partners: Eden Park and South Immokalee. Each neighborhood will have unique constraints and opportunities. Initiatives for South Immokalee will include Dreamland Park improvements. In addition to this opportunity, improvements to park amenities throughout the community’s neighborhoods will be pursued through public private partnerships to create a comprehensive park network to be implemented as funds are available. The Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative also addresses housing needs through identifying and pursuing replacement, renovation, and new construction opportunities. Community Policing and Code Enforcement may also be identified within the strategic revitalization plan for each neighborhood. 11. Immokalee Regional Airport – The Airport provides a strategic location for manufacturing and distribution. Through coordination with the Collier County Airport Authority, the CRA has an opportunity to advance economic development goals through marketing the available land, considering the creation of a “shovel ready” site, and supporting the improvement of infrastructure at the Airport. The proposed projects and programs identified in Figure 4-4 of the attached Redevelopment Plan provide general guidance based on public input on project priorities to implement the overall vision of Immokalee. The Redevelopment Plan also allows for flexibility to move into mid-term and long-term projects if funding and partnerships are identified with private sector, non-profit entities, or other government agencies. The majority of the items identified will require assistance from additional funding sources including the MSTU when applicable and grant funds as well as partnering with other governmental agencies, non-profit entities, and County Departments. It is assumed that projects and programs will be further defined and articulated during the five-year updates of this Redevelopment Plan. The Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) is the local government comprehensive plan, providing goals, objectives and policies to direct future land uses and allowable density and intensity 11.A.a Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Staff Report Immokalee CRA Redevelopment Plan (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) CD-PL20220001219 Page 5 of 5 555 of appropriate uses for future development. The GMP was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in 1989 and has been amended numerous times since the original adoption. The proposed Immokalee Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the GMP and specifically the Immokalee Area Master Plan per Florida Statute, which is recognized in Policy 4.3 of the Future Land Use (FLU) Element of the GMP as a detailed planning effort to “improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design” (Objective 4). It should be noted that the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan provides for a palette of planning approaches, strategies and/or projects to positively affect the built environment of the redevelopment area; and that the initiation of any one of these planning approaches, strategies and/or projects will require more detailed information related to specifics and budgetary availability. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Comprehensive Planning Staff has reviewed the proposed updated Community Redevelopment Plan with specific focus on Immokalee Redevelopment Plan against the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the various Elements of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and have arrived upon a determination of consistency with the GMP. IMMOKALEE CRA ADVISORY BOARD: On February 16, 2022, the CRA Advisory Board recommended approval of the updated Redevelopment Plan to the BCC. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts directly imposed with the adoption of the Community Redevelopment Plan. The capital improvement contemplated within the redevelopment plan shall be funded per availability of the CRA budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The updated Community Redevelopment Plan has been found by staff to be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and based upon this finding there is no impact upon the GMP COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s office on 3/15/22. RECOMMENDATION: For the CCPC to find, determine and declare that the proposed updated Community Redevelopment Plan attached as Exhibit “A”, is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Attachments: A. Draft CRA Plan Resolution B. Proposed amended Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. C. Existing Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan 11.A.a Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Staff Report Immokalee CRA Redevelopment Plan (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) 1 CRA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-________ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ACTING EX-OFFICIO AS THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, which is presently codified in Part III of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000-82 declared the need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and authorized the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle and Immokalee study area; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-83 established the Board of County Commissioners as the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) to carry out redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-181 adopted the Community Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2019-75 adopted the first amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan primarily pertaining to the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, the Board now desires to further modify portions of the Community Redevelopment Plan primarily pertaining to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, Section 163.361 of Florida Statutes authorizes and provides the procedure for modification of community redevelopment plans; and WHEREAS, The Community Redevelopment Agency hereby provides recommendation that it is desirable and necessary to amend the Community Redevelopment Plan as contemplated herein to further the community redevelopment purposes; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (“Local Planning Agency”) conducted a formal review at a public hearing on April 7, 2022, and submitted its recommendations to the Community Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, on May 10,2022, pursuant to Section 163.361, Florida Statutes, the 11.A.b Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: DRAFT CRA Plan Resolution 3.18.22 JAB (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) 2 Community Redevelopment Agency provided notice and conducted a public meeting to receive comment on the proposed modification; and WHEREAS, having received public comment during the meeting as required by Section 163.361, the Community Redevelopment Agency recommends that the Board approve and adopt the amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IN REGULAR SESSION DULY ASSEMBLED ON THIS _____ DAY OF _______________ 2022 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: I. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan (Attachment “A”) meets the requirements of Section 163.360, Florida Statutes. II. That the Community Redevelopment Agency recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve and adopt the amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Area Plan as provided herein. II. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting ex-officio as the governing board of the Collier County Redevelopment Agency, this ______ day of _______, 2022, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By___________________________ By: , Deputy Clerk William L. McDaniel, Jr. Co - Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Jennifer A. Belpedio Assistant County Attorney 11.A.b Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: DRAFT CRA Plan Resolution 3.18.22 JAB (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) MEMORANDUM Date: March 28, 2022 To: Mike Bosi, Zoning Director From: Debrah Forester, CRA Director RE: April 7, 2022 -CCPC Planning Commission Meeting ERRATA SHEET - MINOR CHANGES TO PROPOSED UPDATES TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN At their April 7, 2022 regular meeting, the CCPC will review an amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan, related to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area Plan, for consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The attached errata sheet pages reflect minor changes to page 4-25 and 4-26 of the Plan which were requested by the Collier County Airport Authority staff. Please provide this information to the CCPC with their meeting agenda packet. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. 11.A.d Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Mike Bosi Memo March 28 2022 (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) 4-25 DRAFT MARCH 228, 2022 Exhibit L provides the Key Findings section of the report. According to the August 2021 Greater Naples Chamber - Chamber Connect Economic Indicators Report: “Collier County is at risk of increasing gaps in jobs and talent. In order to fulfill the demand for goods and services of our growing population, the Florida Chamber estimates we will need an increase of 44K net new jobs by 2030. The 2020 Census put Collier County's population at 393K with an estimated increase of 10% by 2025. While the population continues to grow, Collier County has 1.5 times the national average of potential retirees and 30% fewer millennials than the national average to fill the gap.” Immokalee Regional Airport is located on 1,300 acres within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area and is approximately 35 miles from coastal Naples, 10 miles from the new town of Ave Maria, and 110 miles northwest of the Port of Miami. Originally used as an Army Air Corps training base during World War II, the base was later abandoned. The Federal Surplus Act turned the airport over to Collier County in the 1960s. In 1993, the Collier County Airport Authority was created to oversee the development and management of three publicly owned general aviation airports in the County: Immokalee, Marco Island and Everglade City. Over the years, grants have been awarded to improve the Immokalee Regional Airport and develop it as a catalyst for economic development. In 2019 the Immokalee Regional Airport Airport Layout Plan (ALP) was completed and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The Immokalee Regional Airport ALP is included as Exhibit M and depicts the airport boundaries, existing infrastructure, and identifies proposed airport development over a 20-year period. The planning period for the ALP is 2017-2037. It forecasted an average annual growth rate of aircraft operations at 1.35% resulting in a total of 48,400 forecasted aircraft operations by 2037, an increase of 11,900 above its current rate of 36,500. Total development costs to achieve the planned improvements are estimated at $47 million from a variety of federal, state, local, and private funding sources. The ALP includes a number of capital improvements based on future demand. Below is the list of projects and current status. Runway 18-36 Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of Runway 18-36 will be complete in January 2022. The improvements were upgraded to include additional lighting and taxiway alignment. Taxiway C Extension: Project completed August 2021. Additional Hangar Capacity: Global Flight Training School was approved to build a three-hangar development. With construction anticipated to commence during the final quarter of 2021. An Invitation to Negotiate process has commenced for additional development and will continue into FY22. Security Upgrades: Anticipated completion December 20221. Full Perimeter Access Road: Environmental Assessment for Airpark Boulevard is anticipated for 2024. Design for airside perimeter road is pending Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funding eligibility with the FAA. 11.A.d Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Mike Bosi Memo March 28 2022 (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) DRAFT MARCH 228, 2022 4-26 The Immokalee Airport Land Use Development Plan identifies the following: Non-Aeronautical (233 Acres): Targeted for Business, Manufacturing, Shipping, and Storage Aeronautical (276 Acres): Targeted for T-Hangars, conventional Hangars, Maintenance Repair Overhaul (MRO); Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) and Cargo The Immokalee Regional Airport provides an opportunity for business development at low land lease rates (based on current rate, the first year rate is $.1533 per square foot). However, the ownership of the land must remain with the Collier County Airport Authority as mandated by the FAA per AIP grant assurances which can be a challenge for business recruitment. The FAA will consider approving a 40-year land lease with an option to renew; however, those terms often are not satisfactory to a new business seeking to make a substantial financial investment. The Collier County Airport Authority markets the available industrial parcels suitable for a wide variety of permissible industrial uses with access to onsite Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) with very affordable lease rates. Collier County Mosquito Control and the U.S. National Guard Training Center (Immokalee Readiness Center) are negotiating final terms with the Airport Authority and are expected to be new tenants at the Airport in the next few years per final lease agreements negotiated in 2022. The development of these governmental facilities is expected to increase consumer retail demand within the community and generate more development opportunity at the Airport. Located within the Immokalee Regional Airport is The Florida Culinary Accelerator @ Immokalee, providing a state-of-the-art commercial kitchen open to a membership base. As noted on the website, depending on the membership level, members may select from a range of customized hours and plans to prepare, cook and package their culinary creations for distribution. The culinary accelerator’s goal is to support area chefs, farmers, and small food businesses achieve their dreams of growing their food businesses and entering the competitive retail marketplace. One of the challenges that chefs, farmers, and small food business face is finding a suitable space for start-up businesses once they reach capacity at the accelerator. The Immokalee Technical College (iTECH) is a state-of-the art technical training center, providing career and technical education programs for high school students and adults. In addition to the post-secondary adult career and technical training programs, iTECH also offers ABE/GED and adult literacy programs. All programs have active business partners who function beyond the traditional advisory capacity found in most technical schools. Under their model, local businesses and associations adopt programs and serve as foundations for curriculum development, financial assistance, connection activities (internships, job shadowing opportunities, professional in residence, etc.), and job placement assistance for graduates. Programs range from Computer Systems and Information Technology to Heavy Equipment Service Technician training. Other Infrastructure & Service Providers The Immokalee Water and Sewer District provides service throughout the ICRA. A service map of Immokalee and the Five Year Estimated Capital Improvements Plan is provided in Exhibit N. This independent district oversees the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (2022-2026) includes approximately 11.A.d Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Mike Bosi Memo March 28 2022 (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Update) COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Collier County Planning Commission April 7, 2022 11.A.e Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan CRA Background FL Statute, Ch 163 Part III –Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 ■CRAs address blight. ■CRA creation requires Finding of Necessity. ■Community Redevelopment Plan guidance and requirements. ■CRA Duration -no more than 60 years after initial plan adoption, if created prior to July 1, 2002. ■Plan must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 11.A.e Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Collier County CRA Resolution 2000-83 -Established Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency ■Declared BCC as Community Redevelopment Agency –Separate, legal entity ■Established Two Redevelopment Areas: Bayshore Gateway Triangle and Immokalee ■Two local advisory boards Resolution 2000-181 -Adopted Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan –Section 4 -Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan –Section 5 -Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan –CCPC found the plan consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan –Duration –30 years Resolution 2019-75 -Adopted First Amendment to Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan -Section 5 –Bayshore Gateway Triangle Area Plan + Administrative updates -CCPC found the plan consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan 11.A.e Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Tax Increment Financing ■Ordinance 2000-42 –Authorized the use of tax increment financing and established two separate trust funds –Bayshore Gateway Triangle and Immokalee 2000 Base Year Annual TIF –increase in revenues above the base year. 11.A.e Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan TYPICAL PROJECT TYPES 11.A.e Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Proposed Plan Amendment Proposed Changes Section 1: 1.1 -Added reference to 2019 Plan Amendment 1.6 -Duration of Immokalee CRA –extended time frame to 30 years (Maximum allowed under F.S. 163, Part III) Section 4: Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan -Complete Update Appendices Added Resolution 2019-75 11.A.e Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Proposed Plan Amendment 2 Section 4: Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area Plan Update 11.A.e Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Planning Process Data Analysis Dec. 2020 -Feb. 2021 Online public survey & Community Kick off Meeting March/April 2021 Goal Validation Focus Group Meetings April/May 2021 CRA AB Workshop with Framework Maps May 2021 Develop Capital Project List for CRA funding Redevelopment Plan Update Drafting Summer 2021 Community Review Meeting & ICRA AB review Draft Redevelopment Plan Oct. –Dec. 2021 ICRA AB endorse Final Redevelopment Plan February 16, 2022 GMD Review March 2022 Planning Commission April 7, 2022HERE 11.A.e Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Proposed Plan Amendment Section 4: Plan Organization: 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies 4.3 Background and Baseline Data 4.4 Redevelopment Program 4.4.1 Action Plan -Prioritization and Phasing 4.4.2 Funding Strategies 11.A.e Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Proposed Plan Amendment Section 4: 4.5 General Requirements 4.5.1 –Overview of Relevant Statutes (Consistency with F.S.) 4.5.2 –Consistency with the County’s Comprehensive Plan 4.5.3 –Acquisition, Demolition/Clearance, & Improvements 4.5.4 –Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes 4.5.5 –Land Use, Densities, & Building Requirements 4.5.6 –Neighborhood Impact 4.5.7 –Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & Assurances 4.6 –Exhibits (A -T) 11.A.e Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Immokalee Vision Statement A rural community that provides safe and affordable multigenerational living opportunities,interconnected pedestrian and transportation connections,a pristine environment,and a thriving economy that celebrates a diverse culture. 11.A.e Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan STRATEGIES OBJECTIVES GOALS Celebrating Culture Economic Development Housing Infrastructure Plan Implementation/Admin Redevelopment Plan 11.A.e Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan GOAL Celebrating Culture: Create a Cultural Destination –Educate residents and visitors on the cultures in the community. –Create the Immokalee Brand. –Immokalee Cultural Center. Culture OBJECTIVES Preserve and enhance the rich mix of cultures and heritage in Immokalee and embrace new ones as they are identified. 11.A.e Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan GOAL Economic Development –Collaborations and Partnerships. –Immokalee Regional Airport. –Establish Immokalee as a regional opportunity for manufacturing and distribution. –Expand commercial opportunities in Immokalee to reduce the gap of retail industry groups. –Support the expansion of medical services… –Support local business startups and expansions. –Expand Educational and Training Opportunities. –Expand tourism as a component of the Immokalee economic base. –Develop Immokalee as a Food Destination. –Expand the availability and quality of internet service‐broadband and beyond. Economic Development OBJECTIVES Strengthen the economic health of the community 11.A.e Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan GOAL Housing –Support multi‐generational housing opportunities in the community. –Neighborhood Initiative. Create a wholistic approach to neighborhood revitalization includes infrastructure, housing, and safety improvements. Housing OBJECTIVES Provide a mix of housing types and price points to allow for safe, high‐quality units in Immokalee. 11.A.e Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Neighborhood Focus Initiative 11.A.e Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan GOAL Infrastructure –Improve water quality by partnering and supporting stormwater improvements. –Promote and improve walking as a safe and inviting mode of travel through a comprehensive network of pedestrian facilities. –Promote mobility through interconnected street patterns and improved roadway conditions. –Improve and maintain water quality and waste management services. –Maintain a high quality of life for all the residents of the community through recreational opportunities. –Improve transit services in the community. –Maintain and improve coordination with private and independent service and utility providers such as Immokalee Water and Sewer, Immokalee Fire Control District, Lee County Electric Cooperative (LCEC) and others. Infrastructure OBJECTIVES Maintain a high quality of life to all the residents and visitors of the community. 11.A.e Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan GOAL Implementation/Administration –Comply with fiscal, legal, and ethical standards as required by Federal, State, and local mandates. –Where applicable, seek funding partners and grants to implement the Redevelopment Plan and leverage resources. –Coordinate with the Immokalee Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU). –Ensure a targeted and balanced distribution of CRA planning and implementation efforts. Implementation OBJECTIVES Maximize resources through collaboration between County, State and Federal agencies to achieve the goals and objectives of the community. 11.A.e Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Action Plan Phasing ■Short Term –5-year planning horizon ■Mid-Term –10 -year planning horizon ■Long-Term –Year 15 –sunset of CRA PLAN AMENDMENT –EXTENDS LIFE FOR THE IMMOKALEE CRA UNTIL 2052 11.A.e Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Prioritization Criteria Criteria: •Funding availability from dedicated or outside sources (aside from CRA funds) •Magnitude of anticipated impact and multiplier effects •Whether planning/design has already been undertaken or completed •Project timing considerations independent of prioritization (e.g., TIGER grant improvements should be completed prior to Neighborhood Initiative commences) •Ability to address health/safety concerns •Degree of need •Geographic distribution of projects in the ICRA area •Priorities identified during annual work plan and five-year plan review 11.A.e Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Opportunities for Redevelopment TIF 11.A.e Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Capital Projects & Programs Funding Strategies: TIF MSTU GRANTS COORDINATION/COLLABORATION/ PARTNERSHIPS 11.A.e Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan TIF Projections –3% Growth Rate Total TIF Estimate = $62M Estimated Capital Improvements -$71M 11.A.e Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan Next Steps Planning Commission April 7, 2022 -Findings of consistency with the GMP Notice to Taxing Authorities Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Adoption Hearing May 2022 Board of County Commissioners Adoption Hearing May 2022 11.A.e Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan QUESTIONS Immokalee CRA Staff: Christie Betancourt, ICRA Manager Yvonne Blair, Project Manager Marilynn Gijon, Administrative Assistant Consultants: Johnson Engineering Laura DeJohn, Director of Planning Christine Fisher, Principal Planner Marina Guirguis, Planner II Acknowledgments: 11.A.e Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: 4-7-22 - CCPC Meeting Presentation (21690 : Immokalee Redevelopment Plan 04/07/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 11.B Item Summary: Housing That is Affordable 101 - Presentation from Jacob LaRow, Housing Manager This memorandum is authored to introduce the PowerPoint Presentation “Housing 101” developed by Jacob LaRow, the manager for Housing, Grant Development & Operations. The presentation is fulfilling a request of the Planning Commission to have primer discussion with Housing before the final four initiatives of the 2017 Community Housing Plan come before the Planning Commission for recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Meeting Date: 04/07/2022 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/14/2022 4:00 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 03/14/2022 4:00 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Skipped 03/14/2022 4:00 PM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 03/17/2022 5:32 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 03/22/2022 10:25 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 03/22/2022 10:42 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 03/23/2022 12:43 AM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 04/07/2022 9:00 AM 11.B Packet Pg. 583 MEMORANDUM TO: Collier County Planning Commission FROM: Mike Bosi, Director of Zoning DATE: March 14, 2022 SUBJECT: Housing that is Affordable Presentation, Jake LaRow, Housing Manager This memorandum is authored to introduce the PowerPoint Presentation “Housing 101” developed by Jacob LaRow, the manager for Housing, Grant Development & Operations. The presentation is fulfilling a request of the Planning Commission to have primer discussion with Housing before the final four initiatives of the 2017 Community Housing Plan come before the Planning Commission for recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. It is anticipated that the final housing initiatives will be brought before the CCPC at the April 21st or May 5th Public Hearing. Mike Bosi, AICP Zoning Division 11.B.a Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Housing Memo-3-14-22 (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Housing 101 JACOB LAROW –MANAGER –HOUSING, GRANT DEVELOPMENT & OPERATIONS –COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 11.B.b Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Collier determination of need •Va riables to consider… 1.Existing inventory 2.Approved units 3.Po pulation growth 4.Housing cost burden 5.Unit of measurement 11.B.b Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Housing Demand Model 11.B.b Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) How we address the need •Pa rtners: Government can not and should not do alone •Financing: Clearly important, but many other factors determine the success of development •Identify and address impediments: What real or perceived barriers exist that may make affordable housing more difficult to develop? •Preservation: Delivering is important; but equally so is long-term affordability 11.B.b Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Pa rtners •Developers: For profit and non-profit -Project lead •Developer fee •Non-profit set-asides •Enlist A&E, G.C., legal, etc. •Government: City, County, Feds (HUD, USDA-RD, FHLB-AHP, etc.) •Function both as lenders & regulators –unique role that can make or break deals •Financiers: Banks, Syndicators, Tax Credit & Bond Investors •Not only do they help finance the project, but they are instrumental in success of operations due to their financial interest….IRS! •Other Providers: Social Service Agencies such as those that provide mental health services can partner to develop Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH). 11.B.b Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Financing •National: •Ta x Credit 9%, Private Activity Bonds, 4% Ta x Credits •HUD/FHA •Capital Advance –Section 202 (Elderly) & Section 811 (Special Needs) •FHA Insured with HUD approved Lenders –221(d)(3) and (d)(4) •Ginnie Mae/ Feddie Mac •USDA-RD •Section 515 •Manufactured Home programs •Public Housing Authority –HCV 11.B.b Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Impediments –Obstacles to development •Entitlements •Zoning •Conditional Use •Va riances –Common requests •Pa rking requirements •Set-backs •Unit size •Density •Pe rmitting review time –unique timelines for Affordable Housing 11.B.b Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Affordable Housing Density Bonus –LDC 2.06.00 11.B.b Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Four pending incentives •Housing that is Affordable by right in Commercial Zoning Districts with; • Up to 16 du/acre allowed by right when converting from commercial to mixed use or residential, when impacts are less intensive than commercial use. Streamline Commercial to Residential Conversions • Allow density of up to 13 units/acre of market rate units through PUD rezone for a project that complies with Transit Oriented Design (TOD) Standards; • Density of up to 25 units/acre for projects that are approved through PUD rezoning, comply with TOD standards, and provide 2/3 of bonus density to housing that is affordable; Tr ansit Oriented Development Strategic Opportunity Sites Incentivize Mixed Income Development (Activity Center) •The SOS designation is proposed to allow for max. residential density of 25 units/acre for employment generating projects, when not located within an Activity Center; • Requires that a minimum of 20% of total dwelling units must be committed to Low or Very Low-income levels; • Increases allowed density in Activity Centers (Intersection of major roadways) from 16 units/acre to 25 units per acre; • Rewards highest density when projects serve the greatest number of income levels; 11.B.b Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101) Questions? 11.B.b Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: CPCC - Housing 101 - 4.7.22 Draft (21698 : Affordable Housing 101)