MPO Technical Advisory Committee Agenda 02/28/2022
This is an in-person meeting
February 28, 2022, 9:30 AM
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of the Agenda
4. Approval of the January 24, 2022
Meeting Minutes
5. Open to Public for Comments
Items Not on the Agenda
6. Agency Updates
A. FDOT
B. MPO Executive Director
7. Committee Action
A. Endorse 2050 LRTP Scope
B. Review & comment on Draft UPWP
(new 2-yr)
8. Reports & Presentations*
9. Member Comments
10. Distribution Items
11. Next Meeting Date
March 28, 2022
12. Adjournment
*May Require Committee Action
PLEASE NOTE:
The meetings of the advisory committees of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) are open to
the public and citizen input is encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon
recognition of the Chairperson. Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda should contact the MPO
Director at least 14 days prior to the meeting date. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the advisory
committee will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim
record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to
participate in this meeting should contact the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 72 hours prior to the
meeting by calling (239) 252-5814. The MPO’s planning process is conducted in accordance with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who believes that within the MPO’s
planning process they have been discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin,
disability, or familial status may file a complaint with the Collier MPO Title VI Specialist Ms. Danielle Bates (239)
252-5814 or by email at: Danielle.Bates@colliercountyfl.gov, or in writing to the Collier MPO, attention: Ms.
Bates, at 2885 South Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104.
Agenda TAC
Technical Advisory Committee
GMD Planning & Regulation
Conf. Room 609/610
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
1
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE of the
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
MEETING MINUTES
January 24, 2022 9:30 a.m.
1. Call to Order
Ms. Lantz called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m.
2. Roll Call
Ms. Bates called the roll and confirmed a quorum was present.
TAC Members Present
Lorraine Lantz, Chair, Collier County Transportation Planning
Tim Pinter, Vice-Chair, City of Marco Island
Don Scott, Lee County MPO
Michelle Arnold, Collier County PTNE
Ute Vandersluis, Naples Airport Authority
Dave Rivera, City of Naples (alternate) [arrived item 5]
Allison Bickett, City of Naples [arrived item 7a]
TAC Members Absent
Dan Hall, Collier County Traffic Operations
Margaret Wuerstle, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
Andy Holland, City of Naples
John Kasten, Collier County School District
Tim Brock, Everglades City
Daniel Smith, City of Marco Island
Andrew Bennett, Collier County Airport Authority
MPO Staff
Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director
Brandy Otero, Principal Planner
Scott Philips, Principal Planner
Danielle Bates, Administrative Assistant
Others Present
Victoria Peters, FDOT
Steve Ludwinski, Corradino Group
2
3. Approval of the Agenda
Ms. Arnold moved to approve the agenda. Ms. Vandersluis seconded. Carried
unanimously.
4. Approval of the November 29, 2021 Meeting Minutes
Mr. Scott moved to approve the November 29, 2022 meeting minutes. Ms. Arnold
seconded. Carried unanimously.
5. Public Comments for Items not on the Agenda
None.
6. Agency Updates
A. FDOT
Ms. McLaughlin for Ms. Peters: FDOT requests that those who submitted projects,
enter them into the GAP system to start the constructability review process. There will be GAP
training soon.
Members asked about who submits these, if something can be provided in writing and
when the training is. Staff answered that the agency submits the projects, the training is January
25 at 10 am and Victoria can send something in writing.
B. MPO Executive Director
None.
7. Committee Action
7.A. Elect Chair, Vice Chair
Ms. Arnold moved to elect Ms. Lantz as Chair. Mr. Pinter seconded. Carried
unanimously.
Mr. Pinter: I will not be able to serve as Vice Chair.
3
Ms. Arnold moved to elect Ms. Bickett as Chair. Ms. Lantz seconded. Carried
unanimously.
7.B. Endorse FY 21-22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Amendment 4
Ms. Otero: The main purpose is to recognize the Regional Fare and Services transit
planning study on behalf of the Collier County Public Transportation and Neighborhood
Enhancement (PTNE) Division. We also reallocated funding within tasks throughout the
document. The agenda packet includes an updated appendix for FTA 5305 forms, changes are
shown in strikethrough underline and a clean copy.
Ms. Lantz asked for clarification on the scope and funding for the 2050 LRTP. Ms.
Otero clarified that we’re just preparing the data collection and scope and no more funding is
needed at this time.
Mr. Scott moved to endorse FY 21-22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
Amendment 4. Mr. Pinter seconded. Passed unanimously.
7.C. Endorse New Transit Priority
Ms. McLaughlin: Presented the Executive Summary. This is a request for the committee
to endorse adding the reconstruction of a maintenance building to the 2021 transit priority list.
The MPO’s Surface Transportation – Urban (SU) FY2022 funds (aka “box”) contains about $5
million; this would transfer $3 million to transit. The project was included in the 2045 Long
Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), a former TIP as a rehabilitation project programmed for
$11.275 million in FY 21. It was determined that the building needs to be reconstructed. We are
taking this to the Board because we have not previously asked them to prioritize the project for
SU funding, and $3 million is a large amount of money. If the priority is approved, the next step
is amending the FY 22-26 TIP to transfer the $3 million to the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) side.
Mr. Pinter asked how the price went from $11 million to $17 million. Ms. Arnold
responded that originally it was going to be a rehabilitation project and now it is a total
reconstruction project.
Mr. Pinter moved to endorse New Transit Priority. Mr. Scott seconded. Passed
unanimously.
7.D. Endorse Amendment 4 to the FY 2022–2026 TIP & Authorizing Resolution
4
Mr. Philips: This is an amendment to the TIP to transfer $3 million in SU funds to FTA.
The packet includes the draft authorizing resolution, TIP page reflecting the transfer and a letter
from FDOT requesting the transfer.
Ms. Arnold moved to endorse Amendment 4 to the FY 2022–2026 TIP & Authorizing
Resolution. Mr. Pinter seconded. Passed unanimously.
7.E. Review & Endorse Scope for 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
Base Year Data Development
Ms. McLaughlin: We’re requesting review, comments and hopefully endorsement for
the base year data development. The timeline for development is driven by the FDOT District 1
planning model. FDOT requested all MPOs submit base year data by the end of June 2022
originally, after a presentation at a conference, it moved to the beginning of June 2022. Due to
the short turnaround, we intend to do the scope as a work order under the General Planning
Contract (GPC). Key components of the scope are listed in the Executive Summary. Items 1-6
are familiar from the last LRTP update. Staff can use assistance with the GIS component, and the
County is in the process of recalibrating the County Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) to the
2020 census and expects to finish by the end of June. There may need to be some adjustments to
back the data up to 2019. We won’t be able to deliver by the end of June, the earliest would be
sometime in July. The attached checklist identifies the data requested and data sources.
Mr. Scott: Can you choose which vendor you want to work with under the GPC?
Ms. Otero: We can do “direct select” if the next contractor on the General Planning
Contract cannot perform the task. The GPC stipulates a rotation structure - we’re required to go
to the next consultant on the list and we have to use them if they can do the task. The next firm in
the rotation is Stantec.
Ms. Peters: “Direct select,” what is that?
Ms. Otero: The GPC has 5 vendors pre-approved by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and FDOT: Tindale Oliver, Stantec, Jacobs, Capital, and T.Y. Lin. Task orders are
issued to the next vendor on the list. If the next vendor is unable to perform a particular task,
then we could select another vendor.
Mr. Peters: You can go out of order?
Ms. Otero: Yes, but we have to provide a reason.
Ms. Arnold: The data year is limited to 2019?
5
Ms. McLaughlin: When FDOT first announced the base year, the takeaway was social
economic data would be based on the 2020 Census, but traffic and employment data would be
based on 2019 conditions due to the effect of COVID and how it altered driving patterns. It’s a
little less clear to me given the final checklist whether FDOT intends to take population back to
2019. Mr. Scott if you have different read, please speak up.
Mr. Scott: They want everything in 2019 – all the data.
Mr. Rivera: Who do we send the data to?
Ms. McLaughlin: Depends on the outcome of the task order – the vendor may make the
request or the MPO may.
Ms. Peters: FDOT will take the data when they get it.
Ms. Arnold moved to endorse the Scope for 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Base Year
Data Development. Mr. Rivera seconded. Passed unanimously.
7.F. Review & Comment on Scope for 2050 LRTP
Ms. Lantz: This is not just data but the whole LRTP?
Ms. McLaughlin: This is the whole LRTP, but we are not asking to endorse it yet. This
is just to review and comment on the scope. Presented the Executive Summary. The County’s
procurement process takes at least a year, including the MPO’s process going through the
advisory committees, FDOT, FTA, and FHWA. The scope is written based on the 2045 LRTP
development process, with additional information about funding sources and terminology from
the new Federal appropriations bill, but it’s challenging to scope the project so far in advance of
receiving explicit instructions from FDOT and FTA. Highlights include pointing out that the process
of developing an LRTP is not sequential – the consultant has to have a team working on multiple
components simultaneously. We specify that we need to receive deliverables such as revenue projections
up front, early in the process, in order to go through the modeling process, in order to go from identifying
needs to determining what is cost feasible. The scope specifies that we want the vendor to use as much of
existing LRTP document as possible and not recreate the elements that don’t change. The scope calls for
extensive public meetings, including regional meetings with Lee MPO. The TAC and CAC led the
development of the 2045 LRTP and we anticipate the committees will do so again. We’re building in time
to meet with the tribes, and calling for six public meetings. The scope adds an element related to the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). The MPO and local governments will be eligible for
competing grants in major categories such as Infrastructure Resiliency, Transportation Equity,
Vision Zero Action Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians, and Safe Streets & Roadways for All.
The LRTP needs to address those categories even though we have yet to receive any guidance
6
about what that will entail. Additionally, the scope spells out the importance of working with
County and localities to develop the revenue projections and the cost feasible plan. The previous
consultant didn’t realize how much work it could be.
Ms. Arnold: Is the map series information in a shareable format?
Ms. McLaughlin: Yes. We have GIS shape files. It’s time-consuming working with
FDOT’s modeling team. The model development schedule starts with developing the existing
and committed network, then analyzing it against the projected 2050 social economic conditions
using the CIGM to test alternative roadway networks. The CIGM factors in population and
development data based on existing zoning and master plans and projects going through
development review; the base data includes the cities as well as the county. The CIGM is a
powerful methodology. We have to cap the population projection to the Bureau of Economic and
Business Research (BEBER) small, medium or high projections. We usually use the medium
projection.
Ms. Arnold: How is transit treated within the modeling?
Ms. McLaughlin: It is like what you saw last time with the 2045 LRTP. We can put in
transit routes and ridership information and the model can see whether that has a significant
effect on congestion. What we learned with an independent study that looked at transit is that
what you have to do and commit to in order to get to minor changes in traffic projections are
beyond what we can affect, but they will be modeled.
Ms. Arnold: I didn’t see that.
Ms. McLaughlin: We can call it out in the scope.
Mr. Scott: It depends on how far out the project is, the Transit Development Plan (TDP)
may be a start.
Ms. Arnold: Whoever reads scope, we want them to know they’ll have to look at transit.
Ms. Lantz: Where is the TDP-major update referenced in the scope? How will the two
plans be coordinated?
Ms. Arnold: I was going to ask too; lessons were learned coordinating with that project.
Ms. McLaughlin: The scope references incorporating the TDP update and extending it
out 10 years. We haven’t gotten to when the TDP update is due versus when the LRTP update is
7
due. FDOT began encouraging coordinating the two plans for the 2045 LRTP, so it’s up to staff
to stay in sync.
Ms. Arnold: Part of issue is the contractor planning out that far.
Ms. Otero: That is included in this scope - they are responsible to look out to 2050. As
far as the TDP, we’re working on the timeline for the draft Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP). As part of the overall budget, we will look at how the two documents line up. We are
aware that we need to make them coincide and budget for them both at the same time.
Ms. McLaughlin: We’re spelling things out in detail because so much became items of
contention last time. We’ve learned it’s difficult with the procurement process to make
adjustments - the scope of work you start with is what you finish with even if the whole world
changes in the interim. We’re aware of changes in the federal appropriation bill. We mention
plans we have to coordinate with the development of the LRTP, like the Bike-Ped Master Plan
update. We spell out that the consultant needs to use FDOT’s costing tools unless more specific
information is known. We mention discretionary grants on page 6, transit needs, extending the
needs analysis in the TDP to address years 10-20, the requirement to include airport master plans
– all of that came into play during the development of the 2045 LRTP. The cost feasible plan is
what comes out of all the analysis. We look at revenues and the project evaluation matrix and
public input, all the advisory committee, technical staff, and MPO Board input. Another thing we
learned is the consultant must include a table of the current TIP in its entirety. The system
performance report we can do in-house with data provided by FDOT. The scope is specific on
when draft chapters are due. We didn’t see chapters until the last 3-4 months during the
development of the 2045 LRTP.
Mr. Scott: Goals, objectives, planning emphasis, emerging mobility only mentioned
here, what are you planning on doing?
Ms. McLaughlin: We don’t know yet, they’re new buzzwords coming from FDOT.
Ms. Peters: I don’t know either.
Mr. Scott: Last time we did AV (Automated Vehicle) modeling; Orlando is studying
electric vehicles, flying vehicles. The issue with these types of things are how we take them into
account. Hopefully mobility on demand is showing benefits in Bonita Springs by then.
Ms. McLaughlin: We will probably receive clarifications and instructions when there
are 6 months to finish the plan.
8
Ms. Arnold: Would it help to have a clause that provides for changes? Did you talk to
procurement to add language for modifications as needed and rules changes?
Ms. McLaughlin: We will have that conversation, there’s a possibility of amending if
the cost doesn’t go over a certain percentage.
Ms. Peters: Last LRTP, what you did to provide for after 2045? It was approved in
December, but you could still communicate with the vendor for last minute changes, is that
included?
Ms. McLaughlin: That’s included.
Ms. Peters: We have people brought on board looking for consistency, they’re looking at
all MPOs in District 1. They’re another set of eyes but sometimes it comes after or when the plan
is about to be approved.
Ms. Lantz: At minimum, that’s helpful. You may have to have an additional option to
include anything that changes so there’s some wiggle room. From the County perspective, we
use the LRTP’s cost estimates for our budget estimates and they’re very low at this point. It’s a
concern that you use FDOT’s costing tool - it’s not the best. Other agencies are having issues.
Mr. Scott: If you look at FDOT’s website, they have a mechanism to keep up with cost
changes, the costing tool is higher than the per mile cost, but that might be old. I’m thinking we
need to put more contingency based on what’s going on now.
Ms. Peters: Work program costs are going up fast, there’s been a lot of moving around
funds and projects, but we’ve experienced a lot of phone calls for bids regarding the cost. They
may ask to keep more of a buffer in the SU box because of this.
Mr. Scott: This is a bid versus an increase in cost issue, it’s delayed when you see it.
Ms. McLaughlin: We don’t need approval yet, but any additional comments are
appreciated. It’s beginning to sound like we can come back in February for endorsement to
include changes pertaining to your comments and meet with procurement to see about the
clauses.
8. Reports and Presentation (May require Committee Action)
8.A. Draft Project Sheets FY23-27 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
9
Mr. Philips: This is the initial draft of the TIP pages. It was developed using the draft
tentative work program released in November and we anticipate the revised work program to be delivered
soon, hopefully without a lot of changes. There are projects for transit, highways, bike-ped, aviation,
etc. Please review and give comments to me or Ms. McLaughlin. We’re bringing forward a draft
of the whole TIP in a couple months.
Mr. Scott: Are you supposed to have something that says Strategic Intermodal System
(SIS)?
Mr. Philips: I’m not sure we captured all the SIS references we need to, but we will.
Mr. Scott: Pine Ridge Road at I-75 didn’t have it. This is way ahead of Lee MPO.
9. Member Comments
Ms. Peters: Anne sent your [bike/ped priority] project applications to me in November
so I could upload them into GAP on your behalf, but that is a conflict of interest, so the County
and municipalities need to upload them into GAP. Let me know if I can help.
Members discussed whether or not they’ve used GAP. Mike Tisch will submit for the
County and Ms. Peters will need to contact the BPAC volunteers.
Mr. Pinter asked for something in writing discussing this change and Ms. Peters agreed
to send something.
Ms. Peters: Be on the lookout for vetting questions on constructability. It will go back
and forth until everyone is at a happy place. They do their own cost estimate.
Ms. Lantz: What is the deadline for uploading?
Ms. Peters: It passed last week, but they all made it to me so it’s okay. I’ll get it rolling, I
have them and I will move them into the 4P group. They [4P group] don’t go into the GAP
system.
Mr. Scott: Is everyone submitting now? It used to be different times across the state.
Ms. Peters: Your priority list isn’t due until June so if we can get them uploaded by end
of next week, we’re fine. I am moving forward with them; they’re using it to track
Transportation Alternative (TA) eligibility. Central Office asked to track who is receiving TA
funds and if we are short on TA funds. I’m in charge of approval and reviews.
Ms. McLaughlin: I’m wondering if Central Office is misunderstanding timelines.
They’re treating it like it’s a real submittal for programming when the projects haven’t been
10
approved by Board yet. In a letter from Wayne Gaither, we had until February to submit priority
lists, so there must be some confusion.
Ms. Peters: It was Central Office that said that. I just wanted to get you updated; you’re
ahead of the curve, there are ones going in now in Lee County. Looking at the system, no one is
aware of the deadline, moving forward the deadline isn’t until February. In the past I’ve still
taken late applications. I’m not going to say no, I look at the priority project list, and fund and
program them. This is a new process. Lots of people had questions about the GAP system, it will
take practice.
Ms. Bickett: Circling back to the discussion on cost estimates, can you expand on what
you’re working on? Projects are scheduled for 2023 but pricing is way off now, when do you
expect to hear about that?
Ms. Peters: The applications are vetted and go through constructability review, then that
cost estimate is put in the draft tentative work program. Sometimes it is more. The 4P group
doesn’t look at projects already in the work program. The projects coming in 2023 may be going
up but we’re not reviewing the cost estimate. If they are cost estimated and get higher bids,
contact Ms. McLaughlin or Ms. Peters if they are MPO priorities. Lots of times projects are
adjusted if a project cost goes up. The MPO has money in the SU box. Anne has the authority to
review requests for more funding and take them to the Board, and I’ll program more money
when the MPO approves. If you know you need more money, come back to us, FDOT doesn’t
look at Local Agency Program (LAP) projects; municipalities have to come back after bidding,
usually it’s not much, around $100,000-130,000.
Ms. Bickett: When we put these together five years ago, we didn’t expect them to go up
so much, we put in a buffer but not this much.
Ms. Peters: Usually we don’t keep a lot in the SU box like $400,000-500,000 but now
the MPO is going to need to keep more.
Mr. Scott: We’ll hear about more money from the new bills. They said check back at the
end of summer and we may have more money.
Ms. Peters: There are also updates in May and June. On July 1 the legislature approves
the budget, and the money moves forward. There’s some money in the SU box. We’ll get a letter
and find out about deadlines. I’ll send a spreadsheet with the applications that asked for TA
funds, how much they requested, and how much they got. They want to know if there are enough
funds to cover needs.
Mr. Scott: Why not ask us? I’d rather use TA money and save SU money.
11
Ms. Peters: The coder immediately uses TA money because it’s constrained. They use
TA funds first because SU funds can be used anywhere. FHWA would like to see it, but they
don’t track it, FDOT asked for traffic management with core applications and TA applications.
Eventually all the applications will go in GAP.
Members discussed the resignations of FDOT Secretary Kevin Thibault and City of
Naples Streets and Stormwater Director Greg Strakaluse, as they accepted roles as CEO of the
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority and City of Bakersfield California Public Works Director
respectively.
Mr. Rivera: Andy Holland is filling Gregg Strakaluse’s role and Allison Bickett is
second in command. [Ms. Bickett clarified she is not yet officially the Deputy Director]
Ms. Bickett: We are hoping to take the Bike-Ped Master Plan to Naples City Council in
February. The request of the City Council was to obtain input and do outreach to residents to get
feedback in March. Then we’ll be able to get stakeholder input, and hopefully the master plan
will be updated in April or May. It will be put in budget in summer. We are moving forward with
the recommendation to do a wider pathway on South Gulf Drive. We will need easements. There
is meeting for the Paradise Coast Trail on January 26.
Ms. Arnold: We have gone through the procurement process for ITS to replace
electronics on buses. As a part of that we solicitated for signal priority and need to coordinate
with the City of Naples.
Mr. Pinter: We have three bike-ped projects this summer, 2 out of the 3 got additional
funding because the bids came in $50,000 and $45,000 higher. Costs were 12% over the previous
year.
10.Distribution Items
11.Next Meeting Date
February 28, 2022– 9:30 a.m. – in person
Ms. Lantz adjourned the meeting at 10:58 a.m.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMITTEE ACTION
ITEM 7A
Endorse 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Scope
OBJECTIVE: For the committee to endorse the 2050 LRTP Scope.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO has revised the Scope based on comments made by the Technical
Advisory Committee at their January meeting. (Attachment 1). The process for continuing to refine the
Scope and issue a Request for Professional Services is expected to take approximately 10-12 months. The
sample timeline shown below is an estimate based on a 3/17/22 transmittal to the Procurement Services
Division. Dates are subject to change dependent upon grantor review time:
• Transmit Scope of Services to FDOT/FHWA for review and comment
• Transmit solicitation request to Procurement Services (3/17/22)
• Draft Solicitation package prepared and routed to MPO for review (3/24/2022)
• Office of Management Budget Review/Grant clause preparation (5/3/22)
• Transmit Solicitation to FDOT/FHWA for review and comment (5/3/22)
• Advertise to BidSync (6/3/22)
• Proposals Due (7/5/22)
• Notice of Recommended Award (8/15)
• Final Ranking/Approval for Negotiation to MPO Board (9/9/22)
• Contract negotiations begin (9/10/22)
• Contract negotiations end (11/10/22)
• Contract Development begins (11/11/22)
• Transmit final contract to FDOT/FHWA for review and concurrence (1/1/23)
• Final contract approval to MPO Board (2/10/23)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the committee endorse the 2050 LRTP Scope for the purpose of
moving forward with the understanding that MPO staff will report back on any changes as we take it through
the procurement process.
ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Revised 2050 LRTP Scope in Track Changes
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director
1
2050 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Scope of Services
(revised per TAC comments 1/24/22)
INTRODUCTION
Every five years, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) updates its Long Range Transportation
Plan (LRTP). Pursuant to federal guidelines, the MPO is scheduled to adopt a 2050 LRTP by December 2025.
The purpose of this plan update is to advance the LRTP’s 20-year planning horizon and to adopt a new Cost
Feasible Plan (CFP) that encourages and promotes a safe and efficient, multi-modal transportation system
that addresses the future year transportation demands. Results of the LRTP process are intended to serve the
overall mobility needs of the area while also being cost effective and consistent with national, state and local
goals and objectives. The 2050 LRTP must conform with 23 CFR § 450.324, address national Performance
Measures and the MPO’s adopted Targets, federal planning factors (23 CFR § 450.306) as updated, state
planning emphasis areas, the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Expectation Letter(s) and new
federal guidance implementing the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).
SCOPE OF WORK
The MPO is issuing a Request for Professional Services (RPS) to hire a consultant team to serve as the Team
Project Manager and coordinate the planning, analysis and public involvement services. The MPO retains all
rights and ownership to the data, reports, presentations, maps, video and figures delivered by the Consultant
in order to complete the tasks in this Scope of Services. The consultant will undertake the following tasks
during the development of the 2050 LRTP:
1.PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The consultant will provide over-all team project management, QA/QC review of documents, and provide
support services as needed. Activities include a project kick-off meeting, management and oversight of the
activities and products produced by the consultant team members and assisting MPO staff with management
of the 2050 LRTP Update. Consultant will coordinate delivery of consultant teamwork products, provide
technical support during staff review of products and communicate needed revisions to the consultant team.
The consultant will determine which of the tasks outlined in this Scope must occur simultaneously rather
than sequentially for the project to remain on schedule and assign tasks to team members accordingly.
Consultant will communicate with all team members as needed to effectively manage the delivery of the
services provided by each firm and will be responsible for maintaining the content of the project schedule,
adjusting as needed, and communicating delivery schedule updates to team members.
The consultant will use the 2045 LRTP in its entirety as the basis for the 2050 LRTP update, updating existing
text, graphics, spreadsheets, evaluation criteria and map series.
Deliverables:
a.Project Schedule, continually updated, showing critical milestones, product deliverable dates, adequate
time for MPO staff review prior to advisory committee, Board, or public meeting.
b.Timely and thorough revisions when requested by MPO staff.
c.On-time product delivery and invoicing.
2.PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
7A - Attachment 1
2
The consultant will develop a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) for the 2050 LRTP consistent with the Scope and
the MPO’s Public Participation Plan. The PIP will include the provision of on-line opportunities for public input
by establishing an interactive project web site and use of social media. The consultant will provide on-line
surveys and maps, prepare necessary materials, exhibits, presentations, notices and handouts for meetings
with the MPO Board and Advisory Committees. Consultant will take minutes and record verbal and
documented comments from the public, staff and elected officials and keep a record of how comments were
addressed in subsequent revisions to the LRTP; conversely, if comments did not result in revisions, the
Consultant will briefly explain why.
The Consultant will provide translations of public meeting announcements and public surveys and for MPO
staff to use when supplementing the consultant-supported outreach by giving presentations to local
homeowner’s and civic associations and by hosting informational booths at special events located in the
MPO’s traditionally underserved communities.
MPO staff from Lee County MPO and Collier MPO participate in the TAC meetings of both MPOs. Collier MPO
and County GMD staff will coordinate closely with Lee County MPO and Lee County staff to ensure that
regional roadway, transit and bicycle connecting corridors are planned jointly during the development of the
two LRTP’s Needs and Cost Feasible Plan. The consultant will present the draft Cost Feasible Plan at a joint
regional Lee County/Collier MPO Board meeting.
To ensure outreach to all stakeholders as required by federal guidance, Stakeholders - The MPO will provide
the email addresses for its Adviser Network, state and federal land management agencies, regional freight
representatives, advisory committee members, Lee County MPO, and other stakeholders.
Deliverables
a. Public Involvement Plan
b. Meeting materials, announcements, handouts; minutes, record of public comments and responses
c. Presentations (minimum of 19)
i. MPO Board (4) – to coincide with major milestones
ii. Joint Regional Lee County/Collier MPO Board meeting (1)
iii. CAC and TAC (6) – to coincide with major milestones and need for public and technical staff
input
iv. Seminole and Miccosukee Tribes (2) – a minimum of two meetings will be offered each Tribe,
the first during initial phase to identify needs and concerns prior to development of the
Needs Plan and the second during development of the Cost Feasible Plan. MPO staff will
initiate communications in accordance with the MPO’s Government to Government Public
Involvement Policy in the MPO’s Public Participation Plan.
v. General Public (6) – six public meetings held in the following three locations: Immokalee,
Golden Gate City and at the Collier County Government Center. These locations have been
identified to facilitate participation by a broad cross-section of the public. The first round of
meetings will be held during development of the Needs Plan and the second round during
development of the Cost Feasible Plan.
3. DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK
3
Vision: The consultant will describe the collective vision for the region in text and graphic format that is based
on a composite of future land uses according to the current policies of the MPO’s member governments,
highlighting developed and developable lands, protected lands, special places, regional roadways that connect
to adjacent counties, regional transit routes and SUNTrail corridors.
Goals and Objectives and Project Evaluation Criteria: The consultant will develop goals and objectives and
project evaluation criteria to address the following factors:
i. The Vision
ii. Input from MPO’s advisory committees, Tribal entities, stakeholders, general public and the MPO
Board
iii. federally mandated Metropolitan Planning Factors (23 CFR 450.306)
iv. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Planning Emphasis Areas as updated. These are
currently equity, resiliency, sustainability, safety and emerging mobility
v. FHWA Expectation Letter(s)
vi. National Performance Measures
vii. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) new formula funds and discretionary grant programs the
MPO and/or local governments are eligible for competing in involving Infrastructure Resiliency,
Transportation Equity, Vision Zero Action Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians and Safe Streets &
Roadways for All.
Deliverables:
a. Draft and Final Chapter 1 Introduction
b. Draft and Final Chapter 2 Plan Process, County Overview, Vision, Goals and Objectives, Project Evaluation
Criteria and scoring methodology
c. Draft and Final Evaluation Matrix and Map Series for inclusion in the 2050 LRTP as an Appendix or Technical
Memo (update 2045 LRTP evaluation matrix and map series as needed)
Map Series
• 2019 Base Year Roadway Network: MPO will provide (developed under GPC Task Order)
• Congested Corridors (Transportation System Performance Report Update)
• Safety Hotspots (Local Roads Safety Plan Update)
• Freight Corridors & Centers (FDOT D1 Report for Collier County)
• SIS Network (FDOT)
• Federal Aid Eligible Roadways (FDOT)
• Hurricane Evacuation Routes (MPO GIS files, 2045 LRTP)
• Existing Transit Routes and Transfer Centers (MPO GIS files, 2045 LRTP, add Park & Rides, update any
routes added or modified – source PTNE)
• EJ Communities (MPO will update based on 2020 Census, under GPC Task Order)
• Coastal Flooding
• Others as needed to address federal expectation letters
4. FINANCIAL RESOURCES
4
The consultant will incorporate the state and federal revenue estimates provided by FDOT. If FDOT does not
provide revenue projections for maintenance of the State road network, the consultant will project revenues
in consultation with FDOT. The consultant will develop estimates for local funding contributions based on the
County’s currently available Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and information provided by the
Collier County Growth Management Department. The consultant will develop City estimates for local funding
contributions based on information provided by each City as applicable. Revenues will be grouped according
to the Planning Time Periods identified by FDOT for the 2050 LRTP.
The consultant will develop realistically available Transit Revenue Projections consistent with the Transit
Development Plan, through the year 2050. The TDP will provide the methodology for transit revenue
projections, but the LRTP consultant must calculate the revenues beyond the TDP horizon.
The consultant will develop realistically available Airport Revenue Projections based on airport master plans
provided by the MPO, and information provided by airport managers and the Federal Aviation Administration.
The consultant will describe the allocation of the MPO’s SU Box among the categories of Bicycle/Pedestrian
Facilities, Congestion Management, Bridges, Safety, and Planning based on the 2045 LRTP. (Reference Pg 6-14
and 6-17 of the 2045 LRTP.)
Deliverables:
a. Draft Chapter 3 Financial Resources
5. FDOT DISTRICT ONE REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Refer to exhibit entitled District One - 2050 Cost Feasible LRTP Model Development Process and Schedule.
The consultant will develop the following components in accordance with FDOT District One’s schedule,
allowing sufficient time for MPO staff and County Growth Management Department staff to review and
approve prior to submitting to FDOT.
a. 2050 Existing and Committed (E+C) Network: The 2019 Base Year Roadway Network comprises the
“Existing” component. The consultant will add roadway network and transit facility and route
improvements programmed for construction in the FDOT-specified TIP, and projects programmed
for completion in the County’s AUIR within the same timeframe to complete the “Committed”
component. The County will provide updated route and headway information
b. 2050 Socio-Economic (SE) Data: The consultant will use the County Interactive Growth Model
(CIGM) to allocate the 2050 BEBR Medium Population Projections to TAZs in five (5) year
increments to match planning periods. The CIGM is operated by Metro Forecasting Models (MFM).
The CIGM projects population growth and associated non-residential development to build-out
based on algorithms that take adopted land use policies and plans into account.
As part of the process, the consultant will analyze whether the TAZ structure should be modified
and coordinate with FDOT, MPO staff and technical staff from affected member governments to
devise the new structure and create the GIS shapefiles.
The consultant will devise a methodology, subject to FDOT’s review and approval, to adjust the SE
data to reflect the Bureau of Business and Economic Development medium population forecast
5
provided by FDOT.
c. Developing and Testing Network Alternatives: FDOT will produce the following model runs and the
consultant will develop the roadway network inputs, transit inputs and SE data refinements called
for, in an iterative process, transitioning from the initial E+C Deficiency Analysis through the
development and testing of the Needs Plan Network and ultimately, the development and testing
of the Cost Feasible Plan Network in cooperation with FDOT. Each step in the analysis will factor
in transit:
i. Deficiency Analysis of the 2050 E+C network and SE data
ii. Alternative 1 Deficiency Analysis – the consultant will provide the network to be tested in
format, beginning with the 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Network
iii. Alternatives 2 & 3 – the consultant will develop the Needs Plan network based on input
received from MPO and GMD staff, MPO advisory committees, MPO Board, stakeholder
and public input
iv. Alternatives 4 & 5 – the consultant will develop the Cost Feasible Plan network which, in
addition to the input described in Section 5c.iii, is predicated on available financial
resources (Draft Chapter 3) and factors in the results of the Evaluation Matrix (identified in
Section 3, deliverable b.)
v. Preferred Alternative Network and SE Data – the consultant will develop further
refinements based on input received up to this point.
vi. Adopted Cost Feasible Model – the consultant will develop further revisions if called for
upon MPO Board adoption of the 2050 LRTP.
Deliverables:
a. E+C roadway network and SE data
b. Adjustments to roadway network, and SE data and transit system for Alternatives 1-5, the Preferred
Alternative and the final Adopted 2050 LRTP.
c. Summaries and analysis of network alternatives scenario modeling in the form of a Draft Technical Memo
or Appendix suitable for inclusion in the 2050 LRTP
6. NEEDS PLAN
The consultant will develop the Needs Plan including the following components, building upon the 2045 LRTP
Needs Plan, Chapter 4) as a starting point:
Major Components
i. Overview
ii. Roadway Needs
iii. E+C Roadway Projects in tabular and map formats, showing congestion based on the deficiency
analysis map provided by FDOT
iv. Other Roadway Needs, including Freight; Bridges; other congestion studies (such as the TSPR, including
the notation that the TSPR is incorporated into the 2050 LRTP by reference) and Transportation System
Management and Operations options to address congestion; and the Project Evaluation criteria such
as Safety, Environmental, Resiliency, as described in Section 3, deliverable b of this Scope
v. Roadway Needs Plan List of Projects in tabular and mapped (GIS and PDF) formats. The consultant will
use FDOT’s costing tool to develop cost for each project unless project specific information is known.
Costs will be developed for present day and year of expenditure.
vi. Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs – include the notation that the MPO’s updated Bicycle and Pedestrian
6
Master Plan is incorporated into the 2050 LRTP by reference; highlight projects eligible for Healthy
Streets Program, Reconnecting Communities Program, and Safe Streets and Roads for All Program (See
Scope - Section 3 Goals & Objectives, New Discretionary Grant Programs)
vii. Safety - include notation that the MPO’s updated Local Roads Safety Plan (LRSP), restructured and
entitled Vision Zero Action Plan is incorporated into the 2050 LRTP by reference (See Scope - Section 3
Goals & Objectives, New Discretionary Grant Programs)
viii. Transit Needs – incorporate the MPO’s updated Transit Development Plan (TDP) by reference and
summarize in text, tabular and graphic format. Extend the Needs Analysis (including project costs)
conducted for the TDP to address years 10-20 of the LRTP.
ix. Air Transportation Needs – update summary in 2045 LRTP and incorporate graphic and tabular
descriptions of Airport Master Plans.
x. ETDM Input and Review – Any new major transportation projects (on the State Highway System or the
Strategic Modal System), or any not previously screened through the FDOT Efficient Transportation
Decision Making (ETDM) process, must be screened through the Environmental Screening Tool (EST).
The ETDM Screening Matrix for Qualifying Projects will be used to determine if a project must be
screened. The consultant will be expected to prepare a purpose and need statement and GIS map for
each project as well as a summary of any major issues/comments noted during project review. The
screening must be conducted in conjunction with the update of the Needs Plan or the Cost Feasible
Plan but completed before the final approval of the plan. The purpose of the planning screen review
is to provide additional information to the MPO to make determination whether the project, as
proposed should be adopted in the LRTP. The screening of local projects not on the State Highway
System is optional.
Deliverables:
a. Presentations during the development of the Draft Needs Plan to CAC, TAC, MPO Board, Tribal
governments and at general public meetings (reference Public Involvement Plan Section 2)
b. Draft and Final Chapter 4 Needs Plan
c. ETDM Screening – Project in GIS (as required by FDOT) and purpose and need statements for each screened
project. List of screened projects included in final LRTP.
7. COST FEASIBLE PLAN
The consultant will develop the Cost Feasible Plan in close coordination with Collier MPO and Collier County
GMD staff based on a multiplicity of factors, including:
• Network Alternatives Analysis described in Section 5 of this Scope
• Financial Resources identified in Section 6 of this Scope
• The project ranking produced by the scoring methodology and Project Evaluation Matrix developed in
Section 3 of this Scope
• Advisory committee, tribal, technical staff, MPO Board, stakeholder, Lee MPO (on regional
connections), and general public input
The Cost Feasible Plan will, at a minimum, address:
I. Roadway Cost Feasible Projects
II. Projects funded by the MPO’s TMA SU “Box” funds, including: Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects,
Congestion Management Projects, Transit Projects (eligible for SU funding), Bridge (New and
7
Replacement Projects), Safety Projects and Planning Projects.
III. Transit Cost Feasible Projects
IV. Freight Network Projects
V. Airport Transportation Projects
The consultant must include a Table of the MPO’s TIP in its entirety in the Cost Feasible Plan. If necessary,
ETDM Input and Review task can be accomplished as part of the Cost Feasible Plan but must be completed
prior to adoption.
Deliverables:
a. Presentations during the development of the Draft Cost Feasible Plan to CAC, TAC, MPO Board, Tribal
governments and at general public meetings (reference Public Involvement Plan Section 2)
b. Draft and Final Chapter 5 Cost Feasible Plan
8. DRAFT 2050 LRTP
The consultant will compile a complete draft of the 2050 LRTP, including at a minimum, the following
components:
i. Executive Summary
ii. Table of Contents
iii. Chapters 1- 5 described in this Scope
iv. Chapter 6 - Implementation Framework
v. Acronyms
vi. References
vii. Appendices
a. Federal and State LRTP Requirements, including federal Expectation Letter(s), in check list format
showing where in the document the item(s) can be found
b. Reference Maps, as needed
c. 2050 Evaluation Criteria Map Series
d. 2050 Roadway Needs Evaluation Matrix
e. System Performance Report (provided by MPO staff)
viii. Technical Compendium
a. Socio-economic Data
b. Project Cost Development Methodology
c. Roadway Network Scenarios - Modeling
d. Public Involvement Summary Report
Deliverables:
Draft 2050 LRTP inclusive of components i-vii (MPO staff will post the Draft LRTP on FDOT’s MPO Document
Portal for review by FDOT, FHWA and FTA.)
a. Complete Draft 2050 LRTP
b. Presentations to CAC/TAC
c. Pre-Recorded Video Presentation (for posting on-line and distribution by MPO staff)
d. Presentation to the MPO Board
e. Presentation at general public meetings (round two)
8
9. FINAL 2050 LRTP
The consultant will make final revisions as directed by the MPO Board, if needed, produce the Final 2050 LRTP,
submit the document to MPO staff as a word doc. and PDF suitable for double sided printing, and produce 20
bound, hard copies. The consultant will re-record portions of the video presentation if needed to address the
revisions. MPO staff will present the final 2050 LRTP to advisory committees and the Board.
Deliverables:
a. Complete Final 2050 LRTP in word.doc and PDF formats, suitable for double sided printing (MPO staff will
post on FDOT MPO Document Portal)
b. 20 bound hard copies
c. Revised pre-recorded video presentation, if needed based on revisions
d. Presentation to MPO Board (if revisions are substantive enough that we need the consultant to present)
10. PROJECT CLOSEOUT
FDOT, FHWA and FTA reviews may not be received until several months following adoption of the LRTP. Upon
receipt, the consultant will make revisions, as needed and resubmit as a word.doc and in PDF format and
produce 5 bound hard copies.
Deliverables:
a. Revised Final 2050 LRTP in word.doc and PDF formats, suitable for double sided printing
b. Supporting Documentation
c. Data Files – all spreadsheets and GIS shapefiles, mxd’s (map-packs)
d. Final Invoice
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMITTEE ACTION
ITEM 7B
Review Draft FY2022/23 – 2023/24 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
OBJECTIVE: For the committee to review and comment on the Draft FY 2022/23 – 2023/24 Unified
Planning Work Program (UPWP).
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO is required to develop and submit to the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) a two-year Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) which serves as the resource and budgeting document for the MPO for the coming fiscal
years beginning July 1st, 2022. FDOT requires submittal of a draft UPWP by March 15th for the purposes
of agency review and comment, and a final version by May 15th. In order to meet the FDOT deadlines and
the MPO meeting schedule, it is necessary for the committees to review the draft UPWP now and the final
UPWP in April.
The focus for the upcoming fiscal year will be updating documents prior to the adoption of the 2050 Long
Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and beginning the update of the 2050 LRTP. In addition, the MPO will
be reviewing and responding to information related to 2020 census data.
The draft UPWP is shown in Attachment 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the committee review and comment on the Draft FY 2022/23 –
2023/24 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO Principal Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft 2022/23 – 2023/24 UPWP
COLLIER
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
BONITA SPRINGS (NAPLES), FL UZA
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS (FY) 2022/23-2023/24
July 1, 2022-June 30, 2024
This document was approved and adopted by the
Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on
May 13, 2022
_________________________________________
, MPO Chair
2885 Horseshoe Drive S.
Naples, FL 34104
(239)252-5814 Fax: (239) 252-5815
Collier.mpo@colliercountyfl.gov
http://www.colliermpo.com
Federal Planning Fund
Federal Aid Program (FAP) - # 0313-058-M
Financial Management (FM) - # 439314-3-14-01 & 439314-3-14-02
FDOT Contract #
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5305(d) Funds
Financial Management (FM) - # 410113 1 14
Contract #G1J00
Contract #G1V40
Contract #
Prepared by the staff and the participating agencies of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. The preparation of
this document has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration (CFDA Number 20.205),
the Federal Transit Administration (CFDA Number 20.505), the U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan
Planning Program, Section 104(f) of title 23, U.S. Code, and from Local funding provided by Collier County, the City of
Naples, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Everglades City. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect
the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
The MPO does not discriminate against anyone on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability or
family status. For more information on the MPO’s commitment to equity and nondiscrimination, or to express concerns
visit https://www.colliermpo.org/get-involved/civil-rights/.
7B - Attachment 1
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION .............................................................................................. 4
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5
DEFINITION OF THE UPWP ............................................................................................................................... 5
OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES......................................................................... 5
LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING PRIORITIES ................................................................................................. 7
AIR QUALITY PLANNING ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. 8
SOFT MATCH ..................................................................................................................................................... 8
CPG PARTICIPATION STATEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 9
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS ...................................................................................................................... 9
FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS ........................................................................................................................ 10
TABLE 1 – PLANNING FACTOR MATRIX ...................................................................................................... 11
FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS ....................................................................................... 11
TABLE 2 – PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS ..................................................................................................... 13
MPO RESOLUTION .......................................................................................................................................... 13
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 14
IDENTIFICATION OF MPO PARTICIPANTS ....................................................................................................... 14
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND BYLAWS ................................................................................................... 15
EXECUTED AGREEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 16
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................................... 16
UPWP TASK OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 17
TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................... 19
TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 23
TASK 3 TIP MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 26
TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING .......................................................................................... 28
TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS PLANNING ................................................. 30
TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING ............... 33
TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION .................................................................................... 37
TASK 8 LOCALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES .............................................................................. 40
3
SUMMARY TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 42
TABLE 3 – FY 2022/23 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 43
TABLE 4 – FY 2022/23 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 44
TABLE 5 – FY 2023/24 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 45
TABLE 6 – FY 2023/24 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 46
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................... 47
APPENDIX A – COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS ............................................................................................... 48
APPENDIX B – PLANNING STUDIES IN THE MPO AREA ................................................................................... 51
APPENDIX C – STATEMENTS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................ 52
APPENDIX D – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ..................................................................................................... 59
APPENDIX E – MPO RESOLUTION ................................................................................................................... 62
4
COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION
5
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION OF THE UPWP
The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
documents transportation planning and transportation planning related activities for the two year period
starting July 1, 2022 (FY 2022/23-2023/24). The UPWP is the basis for allocating federal, state, and
local funds for transportation planning purposes in the Collier Metropolitan Planning area. At a
minimum, a UPWP includes a description of the work and resulting products, indicates who will
perform the work, provides timeframes and deadlines for completing the work, includes the cost of the
work and the source(s) of funds.
This Work Program is consistent with all federal and state requirements. All products and planning
concepts and factors follow Federal and State guidelines. The Collier MPO complies with Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national
origin, age, disability, religion or sex.
The objective of the Collier MPO is to provide for a Continuing, Comprehensive, and Cooperative
approach to the planning process. The MPO performs a variety of tasks utilizing funds under Titles 23
and 49, and Title 49 Chapter 53, U.S.C. Those tasks include annual development of the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP); continually improving the Congestion Management Process; regular
updates to the Transit Development Plan (TDP) and Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
(TDSP); support of Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning activities; preparation of updates to the Long
Range Transportation Plan (LRTP); periodically updating the Public Involvement Plan (PIP),
expanding public outreach activities and implementing strategies to address environmental justice
issues; and supporting FDOT District One and Collier County planning activities with emphasis on
improving traffic modeling and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) capabilities. All eligible
expenses will be reimbursed on an actual cost basis and therefore an indirect rate will not be utilized.
OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Long Range Transportation Plan
The LRTP is a critical tool in the MPO process. It is composed of a Needs Assessment, a Cost Feasible
Plan, and several multi-modal transportation components. It is the primary document in which multi-
modal components (such as pathways, transit, and other projects), land use data, and projected revenues
are integrated in the long range planning process. The 2040 LRTP was adopted in December 2015.
Three amendments to the plan were completed. The 2045 LRTP started in 2019 and was completed in
December 2020. The development of the 2045 LRTP included coordination with member agencies and
the Florida Department of Transportation.
The 2050 LRTP will be a focus for this UPWP. The MPO has started data collection to submit base
year data for FDOT’s District One Regional Planning Model. Next steps include obtaining a consultant
to begin development of the 2050 LRTP. The document is required to be adopted by December 2025.
6
INTRODUCTION (cont.)
Congestion Management Process (CMP)
An operational Congestion Management System (CMS) plan was originally adopted in 1997 and was
updated in 2006. The CMS was developed to reduce congestion by not adding travel lanes to existing
highways, but by initiatives such as improving traffic signal timing, improving intersections
(adding/lengthening turn lanes, etc.), and modifying medians. In 2008, the MPO updated the CMS and
renamed it the Congestion Management Process (CMP). The CMP was updated in 2017. The 2017
update brought the document current with the 2040 LRTP and new federal legislation requiring
performance-based, data driven planning. The 2017 update also adopted transportation performance
measures and required project sponsors to establish baseline measures and report the results to the
Congestion Management Committee and the MPO Board.
The CMP also recognized the need for a more extensive data analysis. This led to the completion of
the first Transportation System Performance Report (TSPR). The TSPR called for updates to the CMP
Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures to be consistent with the analysis included in the report.
An update to the CMP is underway and is expected to be completed in September 2022.
7
LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING PRIORITIES
FY 2022/23 and FY 2023/24 UPWP Transportation Planning Priorities
Completing many technical plans and studies that support the development of the LRTP will be a focus
of this UPWP. Additionally, the MPO will be updating the Environmental Justice analysis previously
completed, by completing an Equity Analysis which will assist in the development of the LRTP and
related technical plans.
Transportation System Performance Report (TSPR)
The first TSPR was approved in September 2020. The TSPR established a consistent methodology for
identifying congested locations using a performance driven approach. The TSPR will be updated prior
to the update of the 2050 LRTP and should be approved by June 2025. This is a supporting document
of the LRTP.
Transit Planning
A major Transit Development Plan (TDP) update was completed in September 2020. The results of
the TDP update were included in the transit element of the 2045 LRTP. A TDP update must be
completed by June 2025 in order to coordinate with the 2050 LRTP. The Public Transit and
Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Department in coordination with the Collier MPO completes
Annual Progress Reports to the TDP in-house.
A Regional Fares/Services study is being conducted to evaluate regional transit service and regional
fares. The study will consist of information to guide analysis and decision making regarding potential
cross-jurisdictional transit projects. This study is expected to be completed by May 2023.
The last Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) major update was completed in 2018. The
Collier MPO serves as the designated official planning agency and performs Transportation
Disadvantaged Planning activities. A major TDSP update is required to be completed 120 days after
reappointment of the Community Transportation Coordinator which will occur in 2023. This update
must be completed and submitted to the Transportation Disadvantaged Commission by October 2023.
Local Road Safety Plan
The initial Local Roads Safety Plan (LRSP) was completed and approved on May 14, 2021. The plan,
funded through the Congestion Management priority process, is a data driven, 5-year safety plan that
will guide the MPO in identifying implementation efforts that support FDOT’s “Vision Zero” goals.
The update to the LRSP will be completed in house with an update to data and statistics prior to the
2050 LRTP update. This is a supporting document of the LRTP.
Equity Analysis
A preliminary identification of Environmental Justice Communities was conducted in 2016 and was
further refined as part of the Existing Conditions analysis for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
MPO Staff will prepare an updated Equity Analysis to assess changes throughout the community.
Regional Transportation Planning Activities
The Lee County and Collier MPOs meet annually to discuss regional issues and projects which may
have a joint impact on the area. The Collier MPO participates in the Lee MPO’s Technical Advisory
8
Committee (TAC) and the Lee MPO participates in the Collier TAC. The MPOs will continue to work
together to endorse and adopt regional priorities for enhancements, TRIP, highway, and transit projects.
In addition, the Collier MPO participates in meetings of the Coordinated Urban Transportation Systems
(CUTS), the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), and in district and
state-wide meetings with FDOT.
AIR QUALITY PLANNING ACTIVITIES
The Collier MPO is in an air quality attainment area and does not anticipate completing any non-
attainment planning activities at this time; however, the MPO planning area’s air quality continues to
be monitored and staff participates in training as needed.
SOFT MATCH
Section 120 of Title 23, U.S.C, permits a state to use certain toll revenue expenditures as a credit toward
the non-federal matching share of all programs authorized by Title 23, (with the exception of
Emergency Relief Programs) and for transit programs authorized by Chapter 53 of Title 49, U.S.C.
This is in essence a “soft-match” provision that allows the federal share to be increased up to 100% to
the extent credits are available. The “soft match” amount being utilized to match the FHWA funding
in this UPWP is 18.07% of FHWA program funds for a total of $188,751 in FY 2022/23 and $172,127
in FY 2023/24 for a total of $360,878. The “soft match” amount being utilized to match carryover
5305(d) funding in this UPWP is 20% of FTA funds for a total of $32,007 in FY 2020/21 and $31,179
in FY 2021/22 for a total of $63,186.
FDOT District One Planning Activities
Florida Department of Transportation- District One District Wide Planning activities for FY22/23-
FY23/24 include the following:
• GIS Application Development and System Maintenance
• Systems Planning and Reviews
• Interchange Reviews
• Travel Demand Model Development
• ETDM/Community Impact Assessment
• Statistics
• Federal Functional Classification
• Traffic Counts Program
• Modal Development Technical Support
• Transportation Alternatives Program Development
• Commuter Services
• State Highway System Corridor Studies
• Growth Management Impact Reviews
• Complete Streets Studies
• Freight Mobility Support
9
• Promoting and coordinating Safety for all modes of transportation, including bicycle and
pedestrian
As part of the 3 “C” planning process, District staff coordinate planning activities with the MPO.
MPO Board and Advisory Committee members are notified of project meetings within the MPO
area. FDOT staff present status reports to the MPO Board and Advisory Committees to solicit
feedback on planning activities and to ensure that District planning studies and MPO planning
activities are coordinated.
CPG PARTICIPATION STATEMENT
“The FDOT and the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization participate in the Consolidated Grant
Program (CPG). The CPG enables FDOT, in cooperation with the MPO, FHWA, and FTA, to annually
consolidate Florida’s FHWA PL and FTA 5305(d) metropolitan planning fund allocations into a single
grant that is administered by the FHWA’s Florida Division. These funds are annually apportioned to
FDOT as the direct recipient and allocated to the MPO by FDOT utilizing formulas approved by the
MPO, FDOT, FHWA, and FTA in accordance with 23 CFR 420.109 and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. The
FDOT is fulfilling the CPG’s required 18.07% non-federal share (match) using Transportation
Development Credits as permitted by 23 CFR 120(j) and FTA C 8100.1D.”
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS
The development of the UPWP has been subject to public review and comment and is consistent with
the Collier MPO’s adopted Public Participation Plan (PPP). The draft is sent to the TAC and CAC for
review, announced on the Collier MPO website and sent to interested parties via email to the MPO’s
listserv on the date the TAC/CAC agenda packets are posted and distributed.
MPO staff responds in writing to input received from the public and all comments received from the
public, advisory committee members and Board members are memorialized and addressed in this
document. All comments received, including from FHWA, FTA, and FDOT have been addressed and
incorporated into Appendix D of the final document.
A draft of this UPWP was endorsed by the Citizens and Technical Advisory Committees on February
28, 2022 and approved by the MPO Board on March 11, 2022. The final document was endorsed by
the Citizens and Technical Advisory Committee on April 25, 2022 and approved by the MPO Board
on May 15, 2022.
10
FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS
In December 2015, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was signed into law. The
FAST act identified the following ten planning factors which have been incorporated into the MPO
Planning Process and this UPWP:
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight;
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of
life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local
planned growth and economic development patterns;
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight;
7. Promote efficient system management and operation;
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation;
9. Enhance travel and tourism; and,
10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system
In addition to the planning factors noted above, MAP-21 required that State DOTs and MPOs conduct
performance-based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data-driven targets to
improve those measures. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal
transportation funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment
decisions that focus on key outcomes related to seven national goals which include:
• Improving Safety;
• Maintaining Infrastructure Condition;
• Reducing Traffic Congestion;
• Improving the Efficiency of the System and Freight Movement;
• Protecting the Environment; and,
• Reducing Delays in Project Delivery.
The FAST Act supplemented the MAP-21 legislation by establishing timelines for State DOTs and
MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP-21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide
targets and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. The Collier MPO
has chosen to support the statewide targets. The transition to performance-based planning is ongoing
and has been addressed within the tasks identified in this UPWP, specifically within the LRTP, the
TIP, and the TSPR. The Collier MPO intends to coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to fully
comply with the performance-based planning requirements.
In November 2021 the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) was signed into law. This
legislation carries forward the policies, programs, and initiatives established by preceding legislation
(FAST Act and MAP-21) to maintain and improve the nation’s surface transportation system. The IIJA
carries forward and expands on these policies and introduces new policies and programs that address
11
new and emerging issues that face the nation’s transportation system. These issues include mitigating
impacts to existing infrastructure due to climate change, developing and maintaining system resiliency,
ensuring equity, researching and deploying new technologies, and improving safety for all users.
TABLE 1 – PLANNING FACTOR MATRIX
FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS
STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS – 2022
The Florida Department of Transportation Office of Policy Planning develops Planning Emphasis
Areas on a two-year cycle in coordination with the development of Metropolitan Planning
Organizations’ respective unified planning work programs. Emphasis areas set planning priorities,
support the Florida Transportation Plan, and give importance to topic areas which MPOs are
encouraged to address as they develop their planning programs. Implementation of the seven goals of
the Florida Transportation Plan requires embracing innovation; extensive collaboration across
jurisdictions, modes and disciplines; an emphasis on customer service; data and performance feedback;
and strategic investments for the efficient and effective allocation of resources.
The Collier MPO has considered the four topics shown below and included them in studies identified
in this UPWP.
Safety
The Florida Transportation Plan and the State’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan place top priority on
safety, with a state target of zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries. In addition to adopting safety
targets, the MPOs must show how their Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and priority projects
in their Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) support progress toward those targets. The UPWP
should consider enhancements to data analyses and community involvement to better inform the
identification and prioritization of safety projects.
Administration Data Collection
TIP Maintenance &
Development Long Range Planning
Special Projects &
Systems Planning
Transit &
Transportation
Disadvantaged
Planning
Regional
Coordination
Locally
Funded
Activities
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency.
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users.
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users.
4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and
for freight.
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote
energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and
promote consistency between transportation
improvements and State and local planned growth and
economic development patterns.
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for
people and freight.
7. Promote efficient system management and
operation.
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation.
9. Enhance travel and tourism.
10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing
transportation system.
Federal Planning Factors
12
Equity
Executive Order 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, created the “Justice40
Initiative” that aims to deliver 40 percent of the overall benefits of relevant federal investments to
disadvantaged communities. This initiative supports Executive Order 13985, Advancing Racial Equity
and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government, outlines federal policy
and defines equity as the consistent and systematic fair, just, and impartial treatment of individuals.
The Florida Transportation Plan seeks transportation choices that improve accessibility and equity by
including a key strategy to enhance affordable transportation, service, and information access options
for all ages and abilities and throughout underserved communities. The MPOs are key to identifying
and implementing improvements based on data-driven project prioritization that considers not only
impacts of transportation projects on a community, but also benefits of projects that can enhance
opportunities for a community. The UPWP should address approaches to furthering transportation
equity.
Resilience
With the passage of the FAST Act, resilience was introduced as a federal planning factor: “Improve
the resilience and reliability of the transportation system and mitigate stormwater impacts of surface
transportation.” Resilience is defined as the ability to adapt to changing conditions and prepare for,
withstand, and recover from disruption. These conditions can encompass a wide variety of
environmental, technological, economic, or social impacts.
MPOs can address resilience within their planning processes by leveraging tools such as the FHWA
Resilience and Transportation Planning guide and the FDOT Quick Guide: Incorporating Resilience in
the MPO LRTP. It should be noted that while these documents focus primarily on the development of
MPO LRTPs and TIPs, addressing resilience should be a consideration within every planning
document prepared by an MPO. MPOs should place a particular emphasis on coordination with agency
partners responsible for natural disaster risk reduction, or who may be developing local resilience
planning initiatives. Additionally, MPOs should consider the additional costs associated with reducing
vulnerability of the existing transportation infrastructure. Proactive resiliency planning will help the
MPO develop planning documents that are ultimately more realistic and cost-effective.
Emerging Mobility
Advances in communication and automation technology result in new mobility options, ranging from
automated and connected transport, electric vehicles, ridesharing, and micro-mobility, to flying cars
and space travel. These changes may be disruptive and transformational, with impacts to safety, vehicle
ownership, travel capacity, vehicle miles traveled, land-use, transportation design, future investment
demands, supply chain logistics, economy, and the workforce. Implementation of all seven goals of
the Florida Transportation Plan can be furthered through both the transformation of major corridors
and hubs and the expansion of transportation infrastructure to embrace and support the adoption of
emerging mobility.
The UPWP should recognize the important influence of emerging mobility on the multi-modal
transportation system and include related planning studies, collaboration efforts, research, or other
activities.
13
FEDERAL PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS – 2022
FHWA and FTA have jointly issued PEAs for FY 22 UPWPs. The following items should be
considered when developing tasks associated with the UPWP:
• Tackling the Climate Crisis – Transition to a Clean Energy, Resilient Future
• Equity and Justice40 in Transportation Planning
• Complete Streets
• Public Involvement
• Strategic Highway Network (STRAHNET)/ US Department of Defense (DOD) Coordination
• Federal Land Management Agency (FLMA) Coordination
• Planning and Environment Linkages (PEL)
• Data in Transportation Planning
TABLE 2 – PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS
MPO RESOLUTION
The Resolution dated May 13, 2022, signed by the Collier MPO Chair, is available in Appendix E.
Administration Data Collection
TIP Maintenance &
Development Long Range Planning
Special Projects &
Systems Planning
Transit &
Transportation
Disadvantaged
Planning
Regional
Coordination
Locally
Funded
Activities
1. Safety
2. Equity
3. Resilience
4.Emerging Mobility
5. Tackling the climate crisis - Transition to a clean
energy, resilient future
6. Equity and Justice40 in Transportation Planning
7. Complete Streets
8. Public Involvement
9. Strategic Highway Network (STRAHNET)/ US
Department of Defense (DOD) Coordination
10. Federal Land Management Agency (FLMA
(Coordination)
11. Planning and Environment Linkages (PEL)
12. Data in Transportation Planning
FDOT Planning Emphasis Areas
Federal Planning Emphasis Areas
14
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
OF THE
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
IDENTIFICATION OF MPO PARTICIPANTS
The Collier MPO is the primary agency responsible for transportation planning in Collier County. The
MPO Board consists of nine voting members representing the county government and three local
municipalities, and one non-voting representative from the FDOT. The MPO is a legislative body with
the power to develop and adopt plans, and to set priorities for the programming of improvements to
the transportation system. The MPO membership includes the following:
COLLIER COUNTY
Commissioner Rick LoCastro, District 1
Commissioner Andy Solis., District 2
Commissioner Burt Saunders, District 3
Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., District 5
CITY OF NAPLES
Councilman Ted Blankenship
Councilman Paul Perry
CITY OF MARCO ISLAND
Councilman Greg Folley
CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY
Councilman Tony Pernas
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
L.K. Nandam, District Secretary, District One
The MPO Board is served by five advisory committees. The advisory committees are summarized as
follows:
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
The MPO’s TAC is composed of technically qualified representatives of agencies responsible for
directing, developing, and improving the transportation system within the Collier County Metropolitan
15
Planning Area. Committee duties include the coordination of transportation planning and programming
activities arising from the review of all transportation technical studies and reports submitted to them.
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
The MPO’s CAC is composed of thirteen (13) individuals representing a cross-section of the
geographic community and special interests, such as minorities and persons with disabilities. They are
recruited to represent the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, the City of Everglades City and the
County Commission Districts of the unincorporated areas of the county. The CAC provides the MPO
Board and staff with the citizen’s perspective on the multimodal transportation planning process. The
CAC is the focal point of the MPO’s public involvement process.
Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
The MPO’s BPAC is composed of twelve (12) at-large voting members representing a wide cross-
section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals,
Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups,
organizations that encourage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates
for persons with disabilities and other transportation disadvantaged populations.
The committee is responsible for providing citizen input into the deliberations of bicycle and pedestrian
related issues within the community and to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan. The BPAC is also involved in recommending priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and
program implementation.
Congestion Management Committee (CMC)
The CMC serves the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the
MPO’s Congestion Management System and the coordination of the CMS with the regional ITS
architecture. The committee is responsible for creating and amending the Congestion Management
Process (CMP) and for prioritizing candidate CMS projects to be funded from the MPO’s CMS boxed
funds.
Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged (LCB)
The LCB for the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) has been appointed by the MPO to carry out the
duties described in Rule 41-2, Florida Administrative Code, as an integral part of the TD planning and
delivery service program.
The LCB is composed of representatives from various State and local agencies, as well as citizen
representatives. A member of the MPO Board is appointed to serve as the LCB’s Chairman.
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND BYLAWS
The MPO operates under an adopted set of Bylaws. The MPO Executive Director reports directly to the
MPO Board. The additional MPO staff members are Collier County employees pursuant to a staff services
agreement. Administrative services are provided by Collier County under the rules and procedures of
Collier County and the State of Florida. Annual audits of the MPO Program are performed as part of the
single audit process under the direction of the Clerk of Courts Finance Department.
16
Official records of MPO business are maintained in the MPO Offices located in the Collier County
Growth Management Division, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. All MPO records
are available for public inspection during normal business hours.
The Collier MPO’s operational procedures fully comply with the public records laws and the Sunshine
Laws of the State of Florida.
EXECUTED AGREEMENTS
The MPO has various agreements in place with State and local governments and agencies that promote
the “3-C” planning process. The following is a list of agreements currently in place:
• Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for the Creation of the Collier County MPO –
FDOT, City of Naples, City of Marco Island, City of Everglades City, Collier County (2/26/15)
• Metropolitan Planning Organization Agreement – FDOT/MPO (7/1/20) – Agreement for
planning funding. This agreement will be updated 6/22.
• Staff Services Agreement – MPO/Collier County (5/28/19). This agreement is in the process
of being updated. Will be approved prior to 5/28/22.
• Lease Agreement – MPO/Collier County (5/28/19) This agreement is in the process of being
updated. Will be approved prior to 5/28/22.
• Interlocal Agreement – Lee and Collier MPO regional coordination (amended 3/20/09)
• Intergovernmental Coordination and Review (ICAR) and Public Transportation Coordination
Joint Participation Agreement – FDOT/MPO/Collier County Airport Authority, Naples Airport
Authority/ Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (11/25/14) Requested updates to
boilerplate. Will update when boilerplate agreement has been updated to new federal law.
• Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) – FDOT/MPO (12/31/22)
• Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1V40) – FDOT/MPO (12/31/23)
These agreements are currently under review and will be updated as appropriate. Current executed
agreements can be accessed by visiting the Collier MPO website at https://www.colliermpo.org/mpo-
agreements-resolutions/.
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
All required certifications and assurances are included in this document in Appendix C.
17
UPWP TASK OVERVIEW
The FY 2022/23-2023/24 UPWP covers the fiscal years starting July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2024.
The specific planning activities to be undertaken over the next two years by MPO staff are organized
into eight tasks, each of which includes individual activities. A brief overview of each of these tasks is
provided below:
1. Administration
Administrative tasks provide for the primary management of MPO activities, including but not
limited to, staff time to organize and conduct MPO Board and advisory committee meetings, public
involvement efforts, and to participate in intergovernmental activities. In addition, this section
includes all necessary expenditures to maintain operations, capital expenditures, Federal and State
compliance documentation and all fiscally related tasks such as audits, progress reporting,
maintenance of financial records, and the preparation of annual administrative reports, such as the
UPWP, are also included. This task will include any necessary updates to agreements or documents
related to the 2020 Census.
2. Data Collection / Development
Task activities in this section includes those needed to monitor and analyze travel behavior and
factors affecting travel, such as socio-economic, land use, environmental, air quality, safety,
security and freight and transportation system data. Evaluation of the data collected in this section
is used for both long and short range planning for the transportation system.
3. Transportation Improvement Program Maintenance and Development
This task annually provides for the development of the TIP, a five-year program of transportation
improvements. The TIP will be developed in cooperation with FDOT and the local governments.
Transportation projects will be drawn from the currently adopted MPO Long Range Transportation
Plan to ensure the program’s consistency relative to priorities and financial constraints. The
prioritization methodology for each State and Federal funding project category will be detailed in
the introduction of each pertinent section of the TIP. Regionally significant projects, regardless of
funding source, are also included in the Transportation Improvement Program. The TIP also
includes a list of multi-modal unfunded State, county and municipal projects that have been
prioritized by the MPO Board.
Task activities in this section include establishing project priorities, annually updating the TIP and
reviewing transportation plans and reports for use in many other UPWP sections and tasks,
including short range planning, the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Transit Planning, and
project planning.
18
UPWP TASK OVERVIEW (cont.)
4. Long Range Planning
Updates and amendments to the LRTP include multi-modal aspects of transportation planning such
as highway planning, transit planning, reviewing enhancement priorities, bicycle/pedestrian
programming, and congestion monitoring of the Systems Planning area. This section is intended
to work with the other sections of the UPWP in the development, review, amending and updating
of the Long Range Transportation Plan.
5. Special Projects and Systems Planning
This task includes various recurring and non-recurring planning projects, including bicycle and
pedestrian planning support and congestion management planning. Complete Streets planning, and
Bicycle and Pedestrian planning and support are conducted in order to provide a balanced
transportation system to ensure that non-motorized travel options are safe, convenient and offer
recreational opportunities. As part of the Congestion Management Process, a recurring
Transportation System Performance Report will be completed in the second year of the UPWP.
6. Transit & Transportation Disadvantaged Planning
The UPWP addresses the continuing efforts of the Transit Program and Transportation
Disadvantaged (TD) Program. Transit support is provided in order to develop the LRTP, TIP and
other plans, programs and technical studies relating to public transportation. In addition, planning
services are provided to ensure a coordinated Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Program in
Collier County.
7. Regional Coordination
This task provides for the creation of a region-wide multimodal transportation planning process in
accordance with Federal and State guidelines to ensure the coordination of transportation planning
and policy activities in FDOT District One. This includes travel expenditures, room rental, and any
other necessary costs for regional planning.
8. Locally Funded Activities
This task allows staff to complete requests to prepare resolutions and policy position statements
which are not eligible for grant reimbursement. In addition, travel expenses that are not eligible for
grant reimbursement will be funded from this task.
19
TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION
PURPOSE:
To conduct activities (including staff travel and capital expenses) including the development and
maintenance of administrative reports and grants contract administration. This task also includes all
public involvement activities and administrative support for MPO planning and programs in general,
including assistance to Federal, State, and local agency staff, as needed. It provides for the
administration of the area-wide multimodal transportation planning process in accordance with Federal
and State requirements, and for the technical management over each project included in the UPWP.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Ongoing administrative activities
• Staff support for MPO Board and Committee meetings
• Develop and Update the UPWP
• Update Staff Services Agreement and Lease Agreement
• Public Involvement activities in compliance with the Public Participation Plan
• Procurement Activities
• Quarterly invoicing request
• Monthly invoicing activities
• Update to Public Participation Plan in 2020
• Maintained MPO website
• Strategic Plan and Annual Report
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
• Administer MPO Governing Board meetings and all Advisory Committee meetings including
meeting advertisement and the preparation of minutes and agenda packages.
• Attend training at conferences, workshops, etc. (MPO staff and Governing Board members)
Attend business meetings as required. Including but not limited to FDOT meetings, Title VI,
ADA and Environmental Justice training opportunities.
• Perform grant and financial tasks including preparing grant agreements, grant compliance tasks,
grant reimbursements, timekeeping, inventory, contract management, invoice payment.
• Purchase of office supplies, computers, printers, software, and audio-visual equipment.
• Rental lease payments for office space and MPO vehicle.
• Monthly payments for phone system, cell phones, website hosting, postage (monthly and
annual permit) and administrative functions to run the MPO.
• Payment for MPO insurance.
• Participate in joint FDOT/MPO annual certification reviews and in Federal TMA reviews.
• Procure services, supplies, and equipment (including office supplies, printers, computers,
iPads, software purchase and licensing, and audio-visual equipment. This includes preparation
of Request for Proposals, Request for Professional Services, purchase orders, contracts, etc.
Lease of necessary office equipment (printers, copiers, etc.).
• Review and maintain existing agreements, by-laws, and COOP. Modify as necessary to stay in
compliance with federal/state rules and laws.
20
• Prepare and adopt the two-year UPWP; process modifications and amendments; submit
progress reports and invoices.
• Monitor and update the annual Strategic Plan and Annual Report.
• Maintain the Public Participation Plan (PPP) and update as necessary. Conduct all activities to
maintain compliance with plan including to maintain and update website, legal ads, press
releases, etc.
• Monitor progress towards goals, including Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals and
ensure compliance with DBE policy.
End Product/Deliverable(s) Target Date
Administer MPO Governing Board and
Advisory Committee meetings.
Ongoing
Progress Reports and Invoices to FDOT Quarterly
Amendments and Modifications to FY
23/24 UPWP
As Needed
Draft FY 25/26 UPWP March 2024
Final FY 25/26 UPWP May 2024
Strategic Plan and Annual Report October -
Annually
Joint FDOT/MPO annual certification
reviews.
Spring
2023/Spring
2024
Prepare for the 2024 Federal Certification
review.
Summer 2024
Public Participation Plan (PPP) - Update
as necessary.
Ongoing
Agenda packages and public notices for
MPO Board and advisory committees
Monthly
Monitor progress towards goals,
including Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise (DBE) goals and ensure
compliance with DBE policy.
Annually
Updated Bylaws, COOP, and MPO
Agreements
As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
21
Task 1 - Financial Tables
Task 1 - Administration
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 22/23
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services
MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Subtotal: $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
B. Consultant Services
Website maintenance, hosting fees, etc. $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Subtotal: $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
C. Travel Travel and Professional Development $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Subtotal: $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
D. Other Direct Expenses Building or room Rental/lease $17,000 $0 $0 $0 $17,000 Insurance $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 Cellular Telephone Access and expenses $3,600 $0 $0 $0 $3,600 General Copying Expenses, equipment lease and purchase, printing charges, computer purchase, software purchase, repairs and maintenance $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 General Office Supplies $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 Legal Advertising $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 Motor Pool Rental and Car Maintenance /expenses $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Postage, business reply permit, freight expenses, etc. $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 Telephone Access, expenses and system maintenance $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Subtotal: $53,800 $0 $0 $0 $53,800
Total: $363,800 $0 $0 $0 $363,800
22
Task 1 - Administration
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2023/24
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $305,000 $0 $0 $0 $305,000
Subtotal: $305,000 $0 $0 $0 $305,000
B. Consultant Services
Website maintenance, hosting fees, etc. $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Subtotal: $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
C. Travel
Travel and Professional Development $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Subtotal: $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
D. Other Direct Expenses Building or room Rental/lease $17,000 $0 $0 $0 $17,000 Insurance $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 Cellular Telephone Access and expenses $3,600 $0 $0 $0 $3,600 General Copying Expenses, equipment lease, printing charges, repairs and maintenance $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 General Office Supplies $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 Legal Advertising $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 Motor Pool Rental and Car Maintenance /expenses $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Postage, business reply permit, freight expenses, etc. $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 Telephone Access, expenses and system maintenance $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Subtotal: $53,800 $0 $0 $0 $53,800
Total: $368,800 $0 $0 $0 $368,800
23
TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT
PURPOSE:
Develop and monitor the multimodal transportation system to preserve capacity, maximize personal
mobility and freight movement, ensure user safety and system security, and maintain the transportation
system’s integrity. Acquire data to evaluate the system’s operating efficiency and conditions to assess
current needs, validate the MPO’s and FDOT D-1 regional transportation planning model, project
future travel demand, and identify future improvements. Coordination with local agencies, jurisdictions
and municipalities when reviewing and updating the forecasts and plans is essential. Update GIS
database to address current conditions that include, but are not limited to functional classification;
roadway network for District One Regional Transportation Demand Model; bicycle & pedestrian
facilities inventory; and prepare various overlays for analytical purposes. Coordinate with Collier
County staff on use of the County’s Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) in analyzing amendments and
updates to the Long Range Transportation Plan.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Developed GIS maps for bike/pedestrian planning activities.
• Updated TAZs and socioeconomic data for 2045 LRTP.
• Updated socio-economic data and TAZ structures for the 2045 LRTP Update.
• 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan adoption in 2021.
• Adoption of FY 2022 performance measures.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
• Coordinate with FDOT, local governments, and neighboring MPOs to collect and provide
transportation data and information to support MPO, federal, and state planning activities,
model development, and performance measures;
• Acquire and analyze data to support performance-based planning efforts such as the Long
Range Transportation Plan, MPO Model Development, Transportation Improvement Program,
Public Transit Safety Plan, Planning and Corridor Studies, Freight Studies, Complete Streets,
Resiliency Studies, Congestion Management Process, etc.;
• Coordinate with federal, state, and local partners to prepare, analyze, and integrate 2020 U.S.
Census data into MPO planning activities and efforts;
• Participate in the FDOT Statewide Model Task Force and regional modeling activities to
support the FDOT D-1 model development, calibration, validation, and maintenance;
• Collaborate with Collier County to update the County Interactive Growth Model;
• Coordinate with the MPO Congestion Management Committee to evaluate data and data
platforms used to analyze system conditions and needs.
• Review functional classifications, boundary information, and TAZ data based on 2020 census.
• Review and provide travel demand model information such as Annual Average Daily Traffic
(AADT) and volume-to-capacity rations for planning documents, other agency and citizen's
requests.
• Prepare and maintain GIS files, and prepare and maintain maps.
• Coordinate with County staff on the County's Crash Data Management System (CDMS)
• Analyze bike/ped facilities and crash data.
24
• Complete equity analysis in preparation for 2050 LRTP.
• Continue coordination with jurisdictions, agencies, and municipalities within Collier County
and adjacent to Collier County on community master plans, transportation system plans, multi-
modal mobility plans, Local Road Safety Plan etc. and the data used to update and maintain
such information.
End Task/Deliverable(s) Target Date
Collier Data for 2020 Validation of the
District 1 Regional Planning Model
August 2022
Updated GIS Files and maps As needed
Coordinate with the County staff on updates
to the County Interactive Growth Model
(CIGM) so that both entities (County and
MPO) are using the most current and accurate
TAZ structure and socioeconomic data
available
March 2021 and
as needed
thereafter
Equity Analysis June 2024
Bike/Ped Crash Data Analysis As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
25
Task 2 - Financial Tables
Task 2 – DATA COLLECTION/DEVELOPMENT
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2022/23
Budget
Category
Budget
Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000
Subtotal: $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000
B. Consultant Services Contract/Consultant Services $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Subtotal $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Total: $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Task 2 – DATA COLLECTION/DEVELOPMENT
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2023/24
Budget
Category
Budget
Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Subtotal: $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
B. Consultant Services Contract/Consultant Services $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Subtotal $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Total: $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
26
TASK 3 TIP MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT
PURPOSE:
Develop Multimodal Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) for FY 23/24-27/28 and FY 24/25-
28/29 that identify all Federal, State, and locally funded transportation improvements consistent with
the requirements of Federal and State laws. Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address
integration of MAP-21 and FAST Performance Management Measures in the TIP as well as new
requirements from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL). This section also includes transportation
system planning tasks related to contingency of operations and short-range transportation planning and
programming.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Coordinated with agencies and jurisdictions on transportation plans and programs.
• Annual preparation of TIP and TIP amendments.
• Annual list of project priorities for inclusion in the TIP.
• Adoption of FY 23-27 TIP
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES
• Develop annual project priorities identifying unfunded highway, transit, bicycle and pedestrian,
planning and congestion management projects that are prioritized by the MPO. This activity
includes review of applications and associated activities.
• Review FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program and Tentative Work Program for consistency
with the LRTP and adopted priorities of the MPO Board.
• Prepare and adopt the TIP. This includes coordinating all efforts with FDOT, local agencies,
jurisdictions and the STIP.
• Prepare and process amendments. This includes reviewing amendments for consistency with
the TIP and LRTP.
• Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address integration of FAST Act Performance
Management Measures in performance-based planning.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO
End Task Target Date
Annual Project Priority Lists June – Annually
FY 23/24-27/28 TIP
FY 24/25-28/29 TIP
June - 2023
June - 2024
TIP Amendments and Modifications As needed
Adopted Safety Targets and Related
Performance Measures
Annually
27
Task 3 - Financial Tables
Task 3 - TIP
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 22/23
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services
MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Subtotal: $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Total: $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Task 3 - TIP
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 23/24
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Subtotal: $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Total: $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
28
TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To begin the update to the 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan and to continue to evaluate plans and
programs for consistency with the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) during development
of the plan. FAST Act Performance measures will be integrated into the 2045 LRTP as required. This
task will work in coordination with other tasks throughout the UPWP, including Administration, Data
Collection/Development, TIP, and Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Prepared and adopted 2045 LRTP. Transmitted to FDOT
• Began collecting base year data for 2050 LRTP.
• Prepared scope of work for the 2050 LRTP.
REQUIRED TASKS:
• Review projects and studies as needed for consistency with MPO plans.
• Continue to incorporate the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) Process into
the Long Range Multimodal transportation planning process. Continue to work with FDOT to
review projects for the ETDM process as they relate to LRTP projects and priorities and to
provide project specific comments as part of the ETDM process. Review purpose and needs
statements for projects and provide comments.
• Attend meetings and participate on committees of FDOT District 1 Regional
Transportation/Planning Model (RPM) Coordinating Committee, GIS Users Groups, Florida
Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) Users Groups, and others as
needed. Participate in FSUTMS training.
• Participate in freight planning, including updates to the regional freight plan, participation in
various freight committees, and coordination with freight stakeholder.
• Participate in on-going studies related to resiliency. Monitor regional and local studies currently
underway.
• Prepare any required amendments or updates to the 2045 LRTP as required.
• Begin coordination and development of the 2050 LRTP.
• Utilize consultant assistance for modeling support, data development and evaluation, and other
support necessary to complete any required updates to the 2045 LRTP and the 2050 LRTP.
• Coordinate with County and Municipalities to review and comment on Local policy issues,
such as Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan regulations as it relates to the
Long Range Transportation Plan.
End Task/Deliverable(s) Target Date
2045 LRTP Amendments As needed
Data Collection – 2020 Model Validation
for 2050 LRTP
September 2022
Socio-Economic forecasts for the 2050
LRTP
June 2024
Public Participation Plan for 2050 LRTP June 2024
2050 Revenue Projections June 2024
29
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
Task 4 - Financial Tables
Task 4 – Long Range Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 22/23
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services
MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Subtotal: $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
B. Consultant Services LRTP $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000
Subtotal: $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000
Total: $50,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $400,000
Task 4 – Long Range Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2023/24
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA 5305 Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU)
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Subtotal: $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
B. Consultant Services LRTP $46,846 $400,000 $0 $0 $446,846
Subtotal: $46,846 $400,000 $0 $0 $446,846
Total: $96,846 $400,000 $0 $0 $496,846
30
TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To complete various recurring and non-recurring planning projects. These projects will assist in
providing a balanced, multimodal transportation system.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Annual Work Program priorities for construction of new sidewalks, pathways and bike lanes.
• Served as liaison to FDOT to communicate the need for bicycle and pedestrian facilities on
State roads.
• Completed first Transportation System Performance Report.
• Began Congestion Management Process Update, which will continue into this UPWP for
completion.
• Completed first Local Road Safety Plan.
REQUIRED TASKS:
• Attend and participate in workshops and seminars sponsored by FHWA, FDOT and other
professional organizations as appropriate.
• Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address continued integration of Performance
Management measures into Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning and Congestion Management
Planning.
Bicycle/Pedestrian Planning
• Participate in special events that promote bicycle/pedestrian activities and safety education.
• Participate in meetings/workshops related to bicycle/pedestrian initiatives, including those
hosted by FDOT, FHWA, CTST, Naples Pathway Coalition, Blue Zones, Healthy Community
Coalition of Collier County, and other agencies.
• Coordinate with FDOT and local governments to ensure that roadway expansion and retrofit
projects work towards meeting the bicycle/pedestrian goals identified in the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan.
• Maintain and update the current Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan as needed, and prior to the
LRTP update.
• Depending on new federal and state guidance, prepare documents to address one or more of the
following programs:
o Vision Zero Action Plan
o Safe Streets for All
o Complete Streets
o Tackling the Climate Crisis – Transition to a Clean Energy, Resilient Future
• Prepare updates to SUNTrail maps as opportunity arises.
31
Congestion Management Planning
• Complete the Congestion Management Process Update.
• Prepare an updated Transportation System Performance Report prior to completion of the 2050
Long Range Transportation Plan. This document will become a guiding document of the 2050
LRTP.
• Attend Lee TMOC and Collier/Lee/Charlotte TIM Team to the extent feasible
• Attend and participate in technical meetings and workshops related to the CMC, CMP and
congestion relief strategies
• Update the Local Road Safety Plan with current data and statistics. This document will become
a guiding document of the 2050 LRTP.
• Facilitate “best practices” approach for incorporating CMP measures into existing plans and
programs, including preliminary engineering, traffic simulation modeling, and project
prioritization.
End Task/Deliverable Target Date
Congestion Management Process Update December 2022
Updated Transportation System
Performance Report
June 2024
Updated Local Road Safety Plan June 2024
Proposed revisions to SUNTrails Map As needed
Safe Routes to School Program
applications and prepare letters of support
As needed
Collier Bicycle/Pedestrian Facility Map
Update
As needed
Bike/Ped Master Plan Update June 2024
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
32
Task 5 – Financial Tables
Task 5 - Special Projects & Systems Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2022/23
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $51,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
Subtotal: $51,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
B. Consultant Services Congestion Management Process Update $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Transportation System Performance Report $0 $100,000 $0 $0 Bike/Ped Master Plan $67,133 $0 $0 $0 $67,133
Subtotal: $87,133 $100,000 $0 $0 $87,133
Total: $138,133 $100,000 $0 $0 $138,133
Task 5 - Special Projects & Systems Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2023/24
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000
Subtotal: $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000
B. Consultant Services Transportation System Performance Report $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000
Bike/Ped Master Plan $54,925 $0 $0 $0 $54,925
Subtotal: $54,925 $50,000 $0 $0 $104,925
Total: $134,925 $50,000 $0 $0 $184,925
33
TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION
DISADVANTAGED PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To provide the necessary resources to support a multimodal transportation system in the Collier MPO
area. This task includes beginning the Transit Development Plan, the 2050 Long Range Transportation
Plan, a multimodal TIP and other plans, programs and technical studies relating to public
transportation. This task includes coordination with the transit agency for the reporting of transit asset
management target measures and target setting for the required Public Transit Safety Agency Plan. In
addition, this task includes overseeing and providing planning services for a coordinated
Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Program in Collier County, in accordance with Chapter 427 of the
Florida Statutes (FS) and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 41-2.
PREVIOUS WORK
• TDP Major Update
• Park and Ride Study
• Transit Impact Analysis
• Coordinated with PTNE to review and adopt the Transit Asset Management Performance
Measures for the Collier Metropolitan Area.
• Ongoing transit and transportation disadvantaged coordination between the Collier MPO and
PTNE.
• Staff support to the Local Coordinating Board as required by the TD Planning Grant.
• TDSP Minor Update
• Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Evaluation
• Annual TD Planning Grant Requirements
REQUIRED TASKS:
• Conduct and maintain the operations of the MPO including providing administrative support
activities such as financial management, contract management, public outreach, personnel
matters, procurement of equipment and supplies and general management of Transit Planning
at the system level within the MPO.
• MPO staff, Board, and PTNE staff will participate in meetings, trainings, workshops, or
seminars related to fixed route which may include fixed routes, ADA or paratransit service.
• Prepare necessary progress reports and requests for reimbursement for Public Transit Grant
Agreements. Participate in quarterly coordination meetings with FDOT to discuss status of
agreements.
• Participate in quarterly coordination meetings with FDOT to discuss transit issues.
• Project Management and Consultant Services to complete the Transit Development Plan Major
Update. Provide comments on the annual reports of the Transit Development Plan prepared by
PTNE.
• Coordinate with PTNE on compliance with all Federal requirements to address transit
performance measures including, Transit Asset Management and Public Transit Agency Safety
Plan
34
• Consultant and staff services to conduct a Regional Fares/Services study which was identified
as a part of the TDP major update.
• Coordinate with PTNE to identify Transit Priorities, review priorities for consistency with the
TDP and LRTP.
• Complete designation of CTC in coordination with Commission for Transportation for
Disadvantaged (CTD).
• Staff support to the LCB, including preparation of agendas, preparation of meeting materials
including legal advertisements of meetings.
• Complete TD activities as required by TD Planning Grant, including annual updates to TDSP
and major TDSP update, CTC Evaluation, annual review of bylaws, completion of LCB
training, public workshop, etc.
• Prepare and submit grant application for TD Planning Grant. Execute grant agreement and
prepare necessary progress reports and requests for reimbursement by the CTD.
End Task/Deliverable(s) Target Date
Participation in meetings, trainings,
workshops, or seminars (TD and Transit)
As needed
Regional Fares/Services Study June 2023
Transit Development Plan Major Update June 2025
(Due September
2025, early
completion will
assist with
LRTP update)
TDP Annual Report (Prepared by
PTNE)– Provide Comments
Annually
Coordinate with PTNE on compliance
with all Federal requirements to address
transit performance measures including,
Transit Asset Management and Public
Transit Agency Safety Plan
As directed by
FDOT
Adopted Transit Priorities June - Annually
TD Grant Application and Agreement Annually
LCB Meetings Quarterly
Minor TDSP Update May 2023
CTC Designation June 2023
Major TDSP Update October 2023
CTC Evaluation May - Annually
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Collier County PTNE, Consultant Services
35
Task 6 - Financial Tables
Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning
Budget Detail for FY 2022/23
Budget Category & Description FHWA PL FTA 5305 (FY 21)
FTA 5305
(FY 22)
Total
FTA 5305
Soft
Match for
FY 21
and FY
22 Trans.
Disad.
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $1,000 $58,924 $64,000 $22,036 $145,960 $30,731
Subtotal: $1,000 $58,924 $64,000 $22,036 $145,960 $30,731
B. Consultant Services Regional Fares and Service Study $20,000 $58,984 $49,995 $128,979 $27,245 TDSP Major Update $65,000 $65,000 $0 TDP Major Update $71,340 $71,340 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal: $156,340 $58,984 $49,995 $0 $265,319 $27,245
C. Travel
MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $9,000 $9,600 $9,600 $2,000 $30,200 $4,800
Subtotal: $9,000 $9,600 $9,600 $2,000 $30,200 $4,800
D. Other Direct Expenses
Website $240 $240 $60 Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Fed Ex/ Postage $120 $120 $80 $1,110 $1,430 $50 Office Supplies $400 $400 $800 $0 $1,600 $300
Subtotal: $520 $520 $1,120 $3,870 $6,030 $410
Total: $166,860 $128,028 $124,715 $27,906 $447,509 $63,186
36
Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning
Budget Detail for FY 2023/24
Budget Category & Description FHWA PL
Total Trans.
Disad.
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $25,000 $22,036 $64,000
Subtotal: $25,000 $22,036 $64,000
B. Consultant Services TDP Major Update $97,340 $0 $97,340
Subtotal: $97,340 $0 $97,340
C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $5,000 $2,000 $9,600
Subtotal: $5,000 $2,000 $9,600
D. Other Direct Expenses Website $240 Legal Ads $0 $2,760 $0 Fed Ex/ Postage $120 $1,110 $80 Office Supplies $400 $0 $800
Subtotal: $520 $3,870 $1,120
Total: $127,860 $27,906 $172,060
37
TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION
PURPOSE:
Provide for the continuation of a region-wide multimodal transportation planning process in
accordance with Federal and State guidelines. To provide training to MPO staff, Board members and
advisory committee members to support transportation planning and policy activities in the region.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Represented the MPO at local, regional, State and Federal meetings, including quarterly
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) meetings and Coordinated
Urban Transportation Studies (CUTS) meetings.
• Submitted freight projects to MPOAC for prioritization.
• Attendance at Lee MPO TAC and TMOC meetings.
• Conducted Joint Lee/Collier BPAC, CAC, TAC and MPO meets as needed.
• Updated Joint TRIP priorities and regional priorities with Lee County and submitted to FDOT.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
• Conduct Joint Lee/Collier BPAC, CAC, TAC and MPO meetings as needed.
• Staff and MPO Board attend MPOAC meetings and workshops, including freight meetings,
noteworthy practices meetings, and MPOAC weekend institute for Governing Board
members.
• Staff participate in CUTS meetings and host as required.
• Participate in Lee MPO TAC, BPAC, and TMOC meetings.
• Monitor and participate in statewide plans and programs, including but not limited to FTP,
SIS, and Vision Zero.
• Attendance at state and local conferences/meetings on Collier MPO related issues provided
by FDOT, FHWA, NHI, USDOT, NTI, etc.
• Monitor and update joint priorities (TRIP, SIS, enhancement, SUNTrail) as necessary. Rank
and prioritize for funding.
• Analysis of State and Federal laws and regulations for MPOs, committees and local
government officials to aid them in the application of regional transportation policy strategies.
• Coordinate with municipalities to review local plans for consistency with MPO plans.
• Participate in regional freight workshops and seminars.
• Prepare and submit freight priorities as requested.
38
End Task/Deliverable(s) Target Date
MPOAC Meeting Participation Quarterly
CUTS Meeting Participation Quarterly
Joint Priorities (TRIP, SIS, etc) Annually – As
requested by
FDOT
Joint Lee/Collier MPO Meetings Annually – As
needed
Freight Priorities to MPOAC As requested
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO
39
Task 7 - Financial Tables
Task 7- Regional Coordination
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2022/23
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $25,000 $0 0 0 $25,000
Subtotal: $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
B. Travel Travel to MPOAC and any other out of county activities as necessary $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Subtotal: $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Total: $32,000 $0 $0 $0 $32,000
Task 7- Regional Coordination
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2023/24
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $25,000 $0 0 0 $25,000
Subtotal: $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
B. Travel Travel to MPOAC and any other out of county activities as necessary $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Subtotal: $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Total: $32,000 $0 $0 $0 $32,000
40
TASK 8 LOCALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES
PURPOSE:
To cover any MPO expenses deemed not eligible or reimbursable by FHWA PL, TD or FTA Section
5305(d) funding.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Reimbursement of travel and training expenses not eligible for reimbursement from the FHWA
PL, TD or FTA Section 5305(d) Grants.
• Payment for staff time to attend safety training and HR training required by Collier County.
REQUIRED TASKS:
End Task/ Deliverable(s) Target Date
Prepare resolutions and policy positions As needed
Participate in Collier County required
Safety and HR training courses
As needed
Payment of any shortfall of consultant or
personnel costs or any invoices not
eligible for grant reimbursement.
As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO
41
Task 8 - Financial Tables
Task 8 - Locally Funded Activities
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2022/23
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Local Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Miscellaneous Expenses
Resolutions and policy positions, travel, membership dues, and any other expenses not eligible for grant reimbursement $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
Task 8 - Locally Funded Activities
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2023/24
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA Trans.
Disad. Local Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Miscellaneous Expenses
Resolutions and policy positions, travel, membership dues, and any other expenses not eligible for grant reimbursement $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
42
SUMMARY TABLES
43
TABLE 3 – FY 2022/23 AGENCY PARTICIPATION
CPG CPG G1V40 Pending
PL SU Soft Match Soft Match
1 363,800$ -$ 80,238$ -$ -$ 444,038$ 30,000$
2 75,000$ -$ 16,542$ -$ -$ 91,542$ 10,000$
3 30,000$ -$ 6,617$ -$ -$ 36,617$ -$
4 50,000$ 350,000$ -$ 11,028$ -$ -$ 411,028$ 122,379$
5 138,133$ 100,000$ -$ 30,466$ -$ -$ 268,599$ 67,000$
6 166,860$ 128,028$ 124,715$ 99,988$ 26,962$ 546,553$ 180,589$
7 32,000$ -$ 7,058$ -$ -$ 39,058$ -$
8 -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ -$ 8,000$ -$
855,793$ 128,028$ 251,937$ 8,000$ 26,962$ 1,270,720$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
855,793$ 450,000$ 128,028$ 124,715$ 251,937$ 8,000$ 26,962$ 1,845,435$ 409,968$
FHWA PL FHWA SU FDOT TD Trust Collier Co.Naples Everglades Marco Is.Total
-$ 251,937$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 251,937$
855,793$ 450,000$ -$ 26,962$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,332,755$
-$ -$ -$ 5,000$ 2,000$ -$ 1,000$ 8,000$
-$ 252,743$ -$ -$ 252,743$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
855,793$ 450,000$ 504,680$ 26,962$ 5,000$ 2,000$ -$ 1,000$ 1,845,435$
* - FTA Section 5305 includes FY 21 and FY 22 funding
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
(1) For FY 2022/2023, FDOT will "soft match" the MPP/PL Funds using toll revenue expenditures as a credit toward the non-Federal matching share.
The amount identified on this line represent the amount of "soft match" required (both State and local) for the amount of Federal PL section 112 funds
requested in this UPWP.
State Support/Match for MPO (1)
FY 2022/23 Funding
FY 2022/23 Local Funding
5305 Carryover *
De-Obligation from Prior Fiscal Years
Regional Coordination
Locally Funded Activities
Total fiscal year 2022/23 funds for all tasks
Total De-obligation from prior fiscal years
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
Administration
Data Collection/ Development
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Long Range Planning
Special Projects and Systems Planning
Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged
FDOT Soft
Match Local TD Trust Total
Amount to
ConsultantTask #Task Description FHWA FHWA
Section
5305 (FY
Section
5305(FY
44
TABLE 4 – FY 2022/23 FUNDING SOURCE
Task Description FHWA PL FDOT Local
Task #Federal Soft Match Funding
1 Administration 363,800$ 80,238$ 363,800$ -$ -$ 444,038$
2 Data Collection/Development 75,000$ 16,542$ 75,000$ -$ -$ 91,542$
3
p p g
(TIP) 30,000$ 6,617$ 30,000$ -$ -$ 36,617$
4 Long Range Planning 50,000$ 350,000$ 11,028$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 411,028$
5 Special Projects and Systems Planning 138,133$ 100,000$ 30,466$ 238,133$ -$ -$ 268,599$
6 Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged 166,860$ 252,743$ 99,988$ 166,860$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 301,810$
7 Regional Coordination 32,000$ 7,058$ 32,000$ -$ -$ 39,058$
8 Locally Funded Activities -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
tasks 855,793$ 450,000$ 251,937$ 1,305,793$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 1,592,692$
State Support/Match for MPO (1)-$ -$ 251,937$ -$ -$ 251,937$
FY 2022/23 Funding 855,793$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 26,962$ 1,332,755$
FY 2022/23 Local Funding -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ 8,000$
Roll Forward from Prior Fiscal Year -$ -$ -$ -$
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks 855,793$ 450,000$ 251,937$ 1,305,793$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 1,592,692$
FHWA SU
Federal
FTA 5305
Carryforward
Total Federal
Funding
State TD
Trust Total
*Soft match includes $188,751 at .1807% and $63,186 at 20% to match PTGAs.
45
TABLE 5 – FY 2023/24 AGENCY PARTICIPATION
CPG CPG
PL SU
1 368,800$ -$ 81,340$ -$ -$ 450,140$ 5,000$
2 40,000$ -$ 8,822$ -$ -$ 48,822$ 15,000$
3 30,000$ -$ 6,617$ -$ -$ 36,617$ -$
4 46,846$ 400,000$ 10,332$ -$ -$ 457,178$ 446,846$
5 134,925$ 50,000$ 29,758$ -$ -$ 214,683$ 104,925$
6 127,860$ -$ 28,200$ -$ 26,962$ 183,022$ 97,340$
7 32,000$ -$ 7,058$ -$ -$ 39,058$ -$
8 -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ -$ 8,000$ -$
780,431$ 450,000$ 172,127$ 8,000$ 26,962$ 1,437,520$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
780,431$ 450,000$ 172,127$ 8,000$ 26,962$ 1,437,520$ 669,111$
FHWA PL FHWA SU FDOT TD Trust Collier Co.Naples Everglades Marco Is.Total
-$ -$ 172,127$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 172,127$
780,431$ 450,000$ -$ 26,962$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,257,393$
-$ -$ -$ -$ 5,000$ 2,000$ -$ 1,000$ 8,000$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
780,431$ 450,000$ 172,127$ 26,962$ 5,000$ 2,000$ -$ 1,000$ 1,437,520$
(1) For FY 2023/2024, FDOT will "soft match" the MPP/PL Funds using toll revenue expenditures as a credit toward the non-Federal matching share.
The amount identified on this line represent the amount of "soft match" required (both State and local) for the amount of Federal PL section 112 funds
requested in this UPWP.
FY 2023/24 Funding
FY 2023/24 Local Funding
De-Obligation from Prior Fiscal Years
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
Total fiscal year 2022/23 funds for all tasks
Total De-obligation from prior fiscal years
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
State Support/Match for MPO (1)
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Long Range Planning
Special Projects and Systems Planning
Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged
Regional Coordination
Locally Funded Activities
TD Trust Total
Amount to
Consultant
Administration
Data Collection/ Development
Task #Task Description FHWA FHWA
FDOT Soft
Match Local
46
TABLE 6 – FY 2023/24 FUNDING SOURCE
FHWA PL FDOT Local
Task #Task Description Federal Soft Match Funding
1 Administration 368,800$ 81,340$ 368,800$ -$ -$ 450,140$
2 Data Collection/Development 40,000$ 8,822$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 48,822$
3 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 30,000$ 6,617$ 30,000$ -$ -$ 36,617$
4 Long Range Planning 46,846$ 400,000$ 10,332$ 446,846$ -$ -$ 457,178$
5 Special Projects and Systems Planning 134,925$ 50,000$ 29,758$ 184,925$ -$ -$ 214,683$
6 Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged 127,860$ 28,200$ 127,860$ 26,962$ 183,022$
7 Regional Coordination 32,000$ 7,058$ 32,000$ -$ -$ 39,058$
8 Locally Funded Activities -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ 8,000$
Total fiscal year 2023/24 funds for all tasks 780,431$ 450,000$ 172,127$ 1,230,431$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 1,437,520$
State Support/Match for MPO (1)-$ -$ 172,127$ -$ -$ 172,127$
FY 2023/24 Funding 780,431$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 26,962$ 1,257,393$
FY 2023/24 Local Funding -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ 8,000$
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks 780,431$ 450,000$ 172,127$ 1,230,431$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 1,437,520$
FHWA SU
Federal
Total Federal
Funding
State TD
Trust Total
47
APPENDICES
48
APPENDIX A – COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS
Acronym Full Name
AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic
ADA Americans with Disability Act
AMPO Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations
ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
AUIR Annual Update and Inventory Report
BCC Board of County Commissioners
BIL Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
BPAC Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee
CAC Citizens Advisory Committee
CAT Collier Area Transit
CEMP County Emergency Management Plan
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CIA Community Impact Assessment
CIE Capital Improvement Element
CIGM Collier Inter-Active Growth Model
CIP Capital Improvement Program
CMC Congestion Management Committee
CMP Congestion Management Process
CMS Congestion Management System
COA Comprehensive Operational Analysis
COOP Continuity of Operations Plan
CORSIM Corridor Simulation
CR County Road
CRA Community Redevelopment Agency
CTC Community Transportation Coordinator
CTD (Florida) Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
CTST Community Traffic Safety Team
CUTR Center for Urban Transportation Research
CUTS Coordinated Urban Transportation Studies
DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
DOPA Designated Official Planning Agency
DRI Development of Regional Impact
EAR Evaluation and Appraisal Report
EMS Emergency Medical Services
ETAT Environmental Technical Advisory Team
ETDM Efficient Transportation Decision Making
F.A.C. Florida Administrative Code
FAP Federal Aid Program
FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
FDOT Florida Department of Transportation
FHREDI Florida’s Heartland Rural Economic Development Initiative
49
COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS
Acronym Full Name
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FM Financial Management
FS Florida Statutes
FSUTMS Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure
FTA Florida Transit Administration
FTP Florida Transportation Plan
FY Fiscal Year
GIS Geographical Information System
ICAR Intergovernmental Coordination and Review
ICE Intergovernmental Coordination Element
IIJA Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
IJR Interchange Justification Report
IT Information Technology
ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems
JARC Job Access Reverse Commute
JPA Joint Participation Agreement
LAP Local Agency Program
LCB Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged
LEP Limited English Proficiency
LinC Lee in Collier Transit Service
LOS Level of Service
LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
MMP Master Mobility Plan
MMTPP Metropolitan Multimodal Transportation Planning Process
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization (includes references to the organization,
MPO Board, Staff and Committees)
MPOAC Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council
MPP Metropolitan Planning Program
NTD National Transit Database
PD&E Project Development & Environment
PEA Planning Emphasis Area
PIP Public Involvement Plan
PL Highway Planning Funds
PTNE Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement
PTOP Public Transportation Operation Plan
QRC Quick Response Code
RFP Request for Proposal
ROW Right-of-Way
SCE Sociocultural Effects
SE Socioeconomic
SHS State Highway System
50
COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS
Acronym Full Name
SIS Strategic Intermodal System
SR State Road
SSPP System Safety Program Plan
SWFRPC Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone
TD Transportation Disadvantaged
TDM Transportation Demand Management
TDP Transit Development Plan
TDSP Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TMA Transportation Management Area
TSM Transportation Systems Management
TRIP Transportation Regional Incentive Program
ULAM Urban Land Allocation Model
UPWP Unified Planning Work Program
USC United States Code
USDOT United States Department of Transportation
UZA Urbanized Area
VE Value Engineering
ZDATA Zonal Data (land use and socio-economic)
51
APPENDIX B – PLANNING STUDIES IN THE MPO AREA
This list is compiled and/or updated by the Collier MPO staff for the purposes of regional planning. It is
included here for reference.
SR 29 (in Collier County) – FDOT is completing a PD&E study that looks at several alternatives to provide
more capacity through Immokalee. An alternative has been endorsed by the MPO Board, but the PD&E has not
been approved by FHWA. This project has been going on since 2007. The Collier MPO 2040 Needs Plan and
Cost Feasible Plan include this project
Old US 41 (Lee/Collier County) – FDOT is completing a PD&E study to evaluate alternatives for capacity and
sidewalk improvements.
Green Boulevard Extension/ North Belle Meade Study – Collier County has not commenced this study, but
it is intended to evaluate the area that extends eastward from CR – 951 to surround the North Belle Meade area
from Golden Gate Estates to I-75 and eastward to Everglades Boulevard. The purpose of this study is to more
clearly define the future collector roadway network in this area. Several east-west and north-south needs-based
corridors have been identified that would enhance circulation throughout the area. The study effort would include
determining the feasibility and preferred alignment for the identified corridors or alternatives that may be
developed during the study.
CR951 Congestion Relief Study – Collier County has not commenced this study, but it is intended to identify
an alternative travel route to the existing CR951 corridor due to forecasted high congestion levels by 2040. The
study area extends from CR951 to City Gate North Boulevard to Benfield Road on its eastern limits to US41 at
its southern limits. The limits of this study area are subject to change. The study will consider multiple travel
routes, improvements to CR951, a no-build option, and evaluate other alternative planning strategies to alleviate
future congestion on CR951.
Collier Blvd. (Bridge Location Analysis from Golden Gate Parkway to Golden Gate Main Canal) – The
design of this project reached approximately 60% plan phase and then was placed on hold. Collier County is
revising the plans and permits and completing a study to look at the current traffic and future traffic to
recommend a bridge crossing location. It is anticipated that a bridge crossing location will be recommended to
the BCC.
Veteran’s Memorial Blvd. Study – Collier County is studying from just west of the new High School entrance
to Old US41 and the continuing on to US41. This work is being coordinated with the FDOT PD&E that is
currently ongoing for Old US41 in Lee and Collier Counties. The purpose of this study is to more clearly define
the corridor for the roadway and to start the environmental permitting process.
Immokalee Area Transportation Network Study – Collier County has initiated a multi-modal transportation
planning study that will compile transportation and mobility projects to complete connections and expand
mobility in the Immokalee area. The project will develop recommendations that identify enhancements to
mobility for all transportation users including bicycle and pedestrians, transit riders and well as vehicles. It is
anticipated that the tools developed from this plan could be used by the MPO, CRA, the County and other
agencies to identify resources and advance projects.
52
APPENDIX C – STATEMENTS AND ASSURANCES
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
APPENDIX D – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
60
Agency Comment Response Page
Agency Comment Type Comment Response Page
61
Agency Comment Type Comment Response Page
62
APPENDIX E – MPO RESOLUTION
63
RESOLUTION 2022-0
RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AUTHORIZING THE MPO CHAIR
TO EXECUTE THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AGREEMENT AND THE 2022/23-2023/24
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM APPROVED ON MAY 13, 2022.
WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has the authority to execute the Metropolitan Planning
Organization Agreement (the “Agreement”) (per 23 U.S.C § 134, 23 CFR § 450 and F.S. § 339.175) and the 2022/23-2023/24 Unified
Planning Work Program (the “UPWP) (per 23 CFR § 450.308(b) and F.S. § 339.175(9); and
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2022, the MPO Chair reviewed and approved the FY 2022/23-2023/24 UPWP and the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
THAT:
1. The Collier MPO has the authority to execute the attached: (a) Metropolitan Planning Organization Agreement, and (b) the
2022/23-2023/24 Unified Planning Work Program.
2. The Collier MPO authorizes its Chair to execute the UPWP and the Agreement.
3. The Collier MPO authorizes its Chair to sign any other related documents that may be required to process the UPWP and the
Agreement.
This Resolution was PASSED and DULY ADOPTED by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board on May 13, 2022.
Attest: COLLIER COUNTY METROPOLITAN
PLANNING ORGANIZATION
By:_________________________________ By:_________________________________
Anne McLaughlin Councilman Paul Perry
Collier MPO Executive Director MPO Chairman
Approved as to form and legality:
__________________________________
Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney