HEX Final Decision 2022-01Page 1 of 6
HEX NO. 2022-01
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
December 23, 2021
PETITION.
PETITION NO. VA-PL20210002276 - 10091 Gulf Shore Dr. - Request for a variance from
Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.E.6 to reduce the required side yard riparian
setback of 7.5 feet to 0 feet for a dock facility on a lot with less than 60 feet of water frontage,
located adjacent to 10091 Gulf Shore Drive, further described as the North 50 feet of Lot 14,
Block C, Re-Subdivision of Part of Unit No. 1, Conner’s Vanderbilt Estates, in Section 29,
Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The petitioner desires to reconfigure the existing dock facility at a parcel that has 50 feet
waterfrontage, which requires a variance of the side-riparian setback standard of 0 feet where 7.5
feet is required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(2) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in-person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in-person.
5. There is a companion Petition No. BDE-PL20200002573 to allow the proposed boat dock
facility to protrude a total of 45 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet wide.
Page 2 of 6
6. The subject property at 10090 Gulf Shore Drive is a small legal non-conforming lot,
approximately 50 feet x 30 feet, situated at the southwest corner of a canal, between two single-
family residential lots. As a result of this oddity, the property’s riparian area resembles an
isosceles right triangle, and the existing dock is an accessory to the single-family residence
across the street at 10091 Gulf Shore Drive. The disconnected property and existing dock was
all worked out and approved in 2011, as described below.
The existing dock navigated a series of public hearings in 2011 to obtain a side-riparian
setback of zero feet where no less than 7.5 feet is permitted as of right, and a dock extension
of 19 feet beyond the 20-foot limit. These two variances were denied by the Planning
Commission but approved by the County Commission (acting in its capacity as the Board
of Zoning Appeals). Those resolutions are attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit
“A.” Those approvals and the associated backup documentation appear to legitimize the
odd property configuration bisected by Gulf Shore Drive and, for purposes of the
residential dock, unifies 10091 and 10090 Gulf Shore Drive. In other words, the dock at
10090 can only be an accessory to 10091. 10090 Gulf Shore Drive is not a stand-alone
boat dock lot.
7. Fast forward ten years, the property owner is requesting the same type of variances to
accommodate a larger vessel (48 feet) from the one approved in 2011 (35 feet). To accomplish
this within the unique riparian area, the dock plan is angled and shifted north, putting the large
vessel on the south side of the dock and a proposed “decked over elevator lift” for personal
watercrafts/kayaks on the north side of the dock. To accomplish this clever use of the small
right-triangular riparian area, the companion petitions are for a zero riparian setback and a 25-
foot extension. This decision pertains to the riparian setback variance.
8. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s
representative. There were no objections at the public hearing.
9. The County’s Land Development Section 9.04.03 lists the criteria for variances. The Hearing
Examiner having the same authority as the Board of Zoning Appeals may grant, deny, or
modify any request for a variance from the regulations or restrictions of the Collier County
Land Development Code.1
1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location,
size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the subject parcel
measures approximately 30 feet by 50 feet and is part of a larger combined property for
which the majority is located on the west side of Gulf Shore Drive. The subject property
has unity of ownership by means of a deed and homesteaded; as such, the subject portion
can no longer be split off despite having previously been a nonconforming lot of record.
The subject parcel has 50± feet of water frontage and is located at the end corner of a
1 The Hearing Examiner’s findings are italicized.
Page 3 of 6
manmade canal. The applicant’s agent notes that being at the corner of the canal, the
riparian line dividing the applicant’s and the south neighbor’s riparian area is restrictive
for the applicant’s riparian area as it tapers at an angle through each property’s riparian
area. The limited amount of shoreline combined with the southern riparian line all but
requires a side setback variance if the parcel is to be useable. The proposed Variance
allows the property owner to make reasonable use of the waterway and dock facility for
mooring and other water based recreational activities while maintaining safe ingress and
egress to the applicant’s vessels.
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the
applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the
Variance request?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that as noted above,
the subject parcel is deemed to be legal and conforming given that it has been combined
for the purposes of development with that across Gulf Shore Drive. The applicant
purchased the subject property as two combined parcels that have existed as such since
the 1950’s. Prior zoning actions described above serve to quiet the use issues with respect
to the use of this parcel for a single-family residential boat dock facility, although every
petition for a variance must be considered on its own merits
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and
undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that it would be an
undue hardship because if the applicant were to maintain the required side/riparian
setback requirements only a much smaller dock facility could be built; however, it would
not allow for two slips or for the mooring of vessels presently allowed by means of prior
zoning actions. The zero-side riparian setback approved in 2011 facilitated the
construction of the current dock on the subject property. The same reasoning for that 2011
variance still exists.
4. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety,
and welfare?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that granting this
variance will promote standards of health, safety, and welfare with exception to the decked
over lift, there is no excess decking. As for the decked over lift, the applicant has explained
that it is to be a platform for kayaks and/or up to two personal watercrafts.
5. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by
these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that granting the
variance would confer on the applicant a special privilege as by definition, a Variance
Page 4 of 6
bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section
9.04.02 allows relief through the Variance process for any dimensional development
standard. However, other properties facing a similar situation are entitled to make a
similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case-by-case basis. That
being said, the petitioner is requesting the variance to have a single-family residential boat
dock as is permissible for other residences in the same zoning district.
6. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land
Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the
public welfare?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the granting of the
subject variance request will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the LDC
and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public
welfare.
The applicant states: “The dock design proposed under this variance petition has been
specifically configured in such a way so as to adequately provide safe access to the
applicant’s vessels while simultaneously avoiding negatively affecting navigation or public
use within the adjacent canal. In addition, docks are a permitted accessory use in the
underlying zoning district, and the applicant therefore has riparian rights to use of the
canal. The end of the canal is also currently built out with 6 boatlifts between 3 properties
that have riparian access at the end of the canal. Therefore, we do not believe the proposed
project will significantly change views from the existing structures.”
Granting the variance does facilitate construction of a boat dock in a unique riparian area
in a zoning district that gives other residences a similar or larger dock.
7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and
objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the areas which
the proposed dock would cover per this variance petition consist of the surface waters of a
man-made waterway that was originally dredged from uplands. Construction within the
side setbacks as proposed will have no effect on any natural preserves, lakes, golf courses,
etc.
8. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that approval of this
Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP with respect to density,
intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions.
Page 5 of 6
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County’s staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner’s
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 9.04.03 of
the Land Development Code to approve Petition.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition No. VA-PL20210002276, filed Nick Pearson
of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., representing Andrew T. and Fern B. Jaffe, with respect to the
property described as 10090-91 Gulf Shore Drive and is further described as the North 50 feet of
Lot 14, Block C, Re-subdivision of part of Unit No. 1, Conner’s Vanderbilt Beach Estates, in
Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida, for the following:
• A variance from Section 5.03.06.E.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code, to
reduce the required side/riparian setback for dock facilities on lots with water frontage of
less than 60 feet from 7.5 feet to 0 feet for a lot with 50± feet of water frontage, for the
benefit of the subject property.
Said changes are fully described in the Proposed Site and Dock Plans attached as Exhibit "B" and
are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A - Resolutions 2012-265 and 2012-266
Exhibit B - Proposed Site and Dock Plans
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
10090 Gulf Shore Drive and is further described as the North 50 feet of Lot 14, Block C, Re-
subdivision of part of Unit No. 1, Conner’s Vanderbilt Beach Estates, in Section 29, Township 48
South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida.
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. The approval is only for the residence at 10091 Gulf Shore Drive.
Page 6 of 6
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
________________________ ____________________________________
Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
EXHIBIT “A”
f
RESOLUTION NO. 12- 2 6 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO
PETITION NUMBER VA- PL2011 -1576, FOR A VARIANCE
FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION
5.03.06.E.7 TO PERMIT A REDUCED SIDE YARD
RIPARIAN) SETBACK FROM 7.5 FEET TO 0 FEET ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10090 GULF SHORE DRIVE
FOR THE BENEFIT OF 10091 GULF SHORE DRIVE,
CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES IN SECTION
29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST IN COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
Ordinance No. 2004 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after
notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance
from Section 5.03.06.E.7 of the Land Development Code to permit a reduced side yard (riparian)
setback from 7.5 feet to 0 feet as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ", in the RSF -3 Zoning
District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory
provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said
regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land
Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
Petition Number VA- PL2011 -1576 filed on behalf of Andrew Jaffe by Jeff Rogers of
Turrell, Hall and Associates, Inc. with respect to the property hereinafter described as:
Lot 34, Block A, and the North 50 feet of Lot 14, Block C, Re- subdivision of part
of Unit No. 1, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, according to the
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book No. 3, Page 18, of the Public Records of
Collier County, Florida (Folio No. 27530160008)
INSTR 4785436 OR 4874 PG 1962
RECORDED 1/9/2013 4A6 PM PAGES 3
Jaffe Variance /VA- PL2011 -1576 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
Rev. 12/12/12 1 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
REC $27.00
be and the same hereby is approved for a variance to permit a reduced side yard (riparian)
setback from 7.5 feet to 0 feet as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ", in the RSF -3 Zoning
District, wherein said property is located.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that two conditions of approval apply to this variance:
1) that the parcel in question be granted its companion boat dock extension as applied for in
BD- PL20110001573; and (2) that the lot containing the corresponding residence obtain a
Certificate of Occupancy for building permit number PRBD20120304314.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
1
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this
12th
day of
December, 2012.
ATTEST: BO
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK CO
y, b.i s`
k
By: By:
F
y
ut Clerk
Approved as- ,t `µfprfn'and legal sufficiency:
eidi Ashton -Cicko
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit A — Site Plan
CP\ 11- CPS - 01128/30
Jaffe Variance NA- PL2011 -1576
Rev. 12/12/12 2 of 2
OF ZON APPEALS
Z C:IOJJN , FLORIDA
3IA A. HILLER, ESQ.
Chairwoman
ro
LU 'm
0
CL Z
I=
CL M
0
Exhibit A
7777i
0z
W
0
0—
0
0.
to
W
8B
in
0
Z
Zx
0
a.
0
C)
w
1)
x
a.
0
n
0
6LJ
W
a ll 'a9it
2
a_
C) F-
L U.
0
0:
CL
wilt
0
6 . r, 040tl
cr)
OG
ro
LU 'm
0
CL Z
I=
CL M
0
Exhibit A
7777i
0z
W
0
0—
0
0.
to
W
Z
Zx
x
ro
LU 'm
0
CL Z
I=
CL M
0
Exhibit A
7777i
0z
W
0
0—
0
0.
to
W
8A • 'vt
RESOLUTION NO. 12- 2 6 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REVERSING THE DECISION OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND
APPROVING BDE-PL2011-000153 THAT REQUESTED A 19-FOOT
BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20-FOOT LIMIT
AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR A 39-FOOT BOAT
DOCK FACILITY ACCOMMODATING TWO VESSELS ON TWO
BOAT SLIPS FOR PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 50
FEET OF LOT 14, UNIT NO. 1, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH
ESTATES SUBDIVISON, IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,
RANGE 25 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, on May 3, 2012, the Collier County Planning Commission heard the petition
and denied the boat dock extension; and
WHEREAS, R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire of Roetzel and Andress LPA, representing
Andrew Jaffe, filed an appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after
notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a boat
dock extension as provided in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code to permit a 39-
foot boat dock facility, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", in the RSF-3 Zoning District for
the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision
and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations
of the Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
The decision of the Collier County Planning Commission is reversed and Petition
Number BDE-PL2011-1573 filed on behalf of Andrew Jaffe by Jeff Rogers of Turrell, Hall and
Associates, Inc. with respect to the property hereinafter described as:
Jaffe Boat Dock Appeal\ADA-PL20120001218 1 of 2
Jaffe Boat Dock Ext.\BDE-PL2011-1573
Rev. 12/12/12
8 A
Lot 34, Block A, and the North 50 feet of Lot 14, Block C, Re-subdivision of part
of Unit No. 1, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, according to the
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book No. 3, Page 18, of the Public Records of
Collier County, Florida(Folio No. 27530160008)
be and the same is hereby approved for a 19-foot extension of a boat dock over the maximum 20-
foot limit to allow for a 39-foot boat dock facility in the RSF-3 zoning district wherein said
property is located, subject to the following condition:
1. The boat dock is only allowed as an accessory use to the residence at 10091
Gulfshore Drive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this
12th day of
December, 2012.
ATTEST:BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
m
t
isismit, Clerk TVA A HILLER, ESQ.
SVOltlii OM*
v
Chairwoman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
it A Ck0
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit A— Site Plan
I #
Agenda
Date —
Date illIzenv
Reed
CP\12-CPS-01186/10
Jaffe Boat Dock Appeal\ADA-PL20120001218 2 of 2
Jaffe Boat Dock Ext.\BDE-PL2011-1573
Rev. 12/12/12
a 8A
O
w Nw
0
Cr) LL
d <L W 8 i.1 Z
rY J,_ O o cc
Etd 0_ w n e
CC
O Cl)
O ~
N
b ry
a
O O
p Nw>
ELT_ X
d° N
v
FY b OZZ Jaa Q d
k~W S i
s
d
co
u0' wl-O X00:3
a Z Z O K i_
oho w¢= v
I
wNJONi wdO
g. e N 12
2C6- 2,,.. .
N
aNW
p z Y p°1-3 D;Z
Irt:
r. rNSYO)3ZZO1,r FrN
Z OLJ Cj , Ow0
j Y¢ZOO =uwioa z
7 WAla aTo< 0,, °w 'm °
w .. ? UWxda °
1—,«cn aw31= al-, 0 z L,, W
O o
CC
0 iteb,
0cC.
lip
til
Z 0 Z .
O Q O O W
m a. m '_ p
Er) ce, io
co N p
W •
i
III
0.
0010"”' N 1
0_
1 0 .
4, a
o .IL .
o
W w M
1
J A0LL 1
A 4(
Q u)w
Q L.L.
W 0z
cn rn
O U G 'n r,2
Z 1 w _
I— cn,, - _
O M c
X c-U r-1 gl
W U co L.
l O C v w
o
W a
wODco ' 2'
C------"
i_i rY 0
c:.,3
L
x
4v 00
tc
N
Exhibit A
w
p:11139 Jaffe dock\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-STATEITHA-1139-PRMT-SWFMWD.dwg INIMANE 9/19/2011 VINCENT ZINKUS
8* '\
I
W
N
LLI W
I
o a fag FFM /
m o :r
E o N
a w o^Xa aLL % V
I ay
Ozdww' >il ?x d
zro: xa w /
ws Q x YJ a _ / co
W w-O ``r3 Z
wP-2 zOr OOx / . . . • 3
W
m o8 PEFI ' o i';
i': 'i
Iki °
zd ~
228W13w oowaf9
mNRilr--
W = oIj <ZOO ,=uwiOa / Q
2 NwWO,maNOO22oii w m o = f-
W x¢- a x-- B O O / z z d WWraacnaw3rarr / c 3 z
Z . c o ° y N
Ili 00
V,\ / / i
V
L 1 0 .
r
I
z ,
0
g_ ' I w -
CC u L_--
o I I i, 'I
il
CC II 1
I ii
I 6 (za,_ N
g M
C' 2
Y
I M O
I 1\ Y\ / \
K\\K\\\\\ \\\ w
011139 Jaffe dock\CAD\SHEETPERMIT-STATE\THA-1139-PRMT-SWFMWD.dwg SECTION 9/1912011 VINCENT.ZINKUS
EXHIBIT “B”
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.263339<> LONGITUDE:W -81.824228SITE ADDRESS:<> 10091 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES, FL 34108Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRLOCATION MAP48-------------------01 OF 07COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY
NESW0102041SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,10091 GULF SHORE DRNAPLESFL34108Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DREXISTING CONDITIONS48-------------------02 OF 07·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."04-24-14-1.31'+0.30'50'1511,445'29'50'28'50'EXISTING DOCK AND LIFTSRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEEXISTING SEAWALL31'39' OF PROTRUSIONAPPROVED PERRESOLUTION #12-2650' SETBACK APPROVED PER RESOLUTION #12-265
NESW051020SCALE IN FEET·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."04-24-14-1.31'+0.30'50'1511,445'28828845PROPOSED DOCKPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTINGSEAWALLTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRPROPOSED DOCK48-------------------03 OF 07PROPOSED DECKEDOVER ELEVATOR LIFT12'10'14'5
'14'5
'
3
4
'3'4
8
'8-POST BOAT LIFTAA04BB051
0
'29'50'10'25'15'1
9
'39'45'
-2.9-
4
.
5
-8.8-6.4-
7
.
6
-8.103612SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRCROSS SECTION AA48-------------------04 OF 0737' DOCK PROTRUSION20' 8-POSTBOATLIFTPROPOSEDDOCKEXISTINGSEAWALLMHWL = +0.30' NAVD 88MLWL = -1.31' NAVD 8848' BOAT PROTRUSIONALL PILES TO BEPVC WRAPPEDFROM 12: ABOVEMHWL TO 6" BELOWSUBSTRATE
0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION BB 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRCROSS SECTION BB48-------------------05 OF 07MHWL = +0.30' NAVD 88MLWL = -1.31' NAVD 88DEPTHSVARYPROPOSEDDOCK3'10' DECKEDOVERELEVATOR LIFT14'8-POSTBOATLIFTALL PILES TO BEPVC WRAPPEDFROM 12: ABOVEMHWL TO 6" BELOWSUBSTRATE
NESW0153060SCALE IN FEET·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."04-24-14-1.31'+0.30'50'1511,445'28828845PROPOSEDDOCKTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY48-------------------06 OF 0710'200'100'NO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT
NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETPROPOSEDDOCKTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCK 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRADJACENT DOCK48-------------------07 OF 07NOTE: THE DIMENSIONS SHOWNARE APPROXIMATE AND ARETAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE103'24'21'21'51'18'36'45'