The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 01/27/2022COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 January 27, 2022 9: 00 AM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Thomas. ClarkegCollierCountyFL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. Collier County Hearing Examiner Page I Printed 112012022 January 2022 Pledge of Allegiance Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing A. Petition No. VA PL20210001771 - Variance request from Land Development Code Section 4.02.01 to reduce the required rear yard setback of 75-feet to 20 feet for a guest house in the Estates Zoning District located at 6761 Sable Ridge Lane in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Gabriela Castro, Principal Planner] Commission District 2 B. Petition No. BDE-PL20210001645 - Request for a 23-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 43 feet into a waterway that is 135 feet wide for the benefit of property is located at 1660 Vinland Way, further described as Lot 14, Landing at Bear's Paw, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commission District 4 C. Petition No. BDE-PL20210001646 - Request for a 21-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 41 feet into a waterway that is 135 feet wide for the benefit of property is located at 1664 Vinland Way, further described as Lot 15, Landing at Bear's Paw, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commission District 4 D. Petition No. BDE-PL20210000708 - Request for a 12-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width to allow an addition to an existing boat docking facility that will protrude a total of 32 feet into a waterway that is 206E feet wide, pursuant to Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for the benefit of property located at 180 Pago Pago Drive West, also described as Lot 193, Isles of Capri No. 2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commission District 1 4. Other Business 5. Public Comments 6. Adjourn Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 112012022 3.A 01/27/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.A Item Summary: Petition No. VA PL20210001771 - Variance request from Land Development Code Section 4.02.01 to reduce the required rear yard setback of 75-feet to 20 feet for a guest house in the Estates Zoning District located at 6761 Sable Ridge Lane in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.. [Coordinator: Gabriela Castro, Principal Planner] Commission District 2 Meeting Date: 01/27/2022 Prepared by: Title: Principal Planner — Zoning Name: Gabriela Castro 12/29/2021 7:54 AM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 12/29/2021 7:54 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Zoning Zoning Hearing Examiner Diane Lynch Ray Bellows Mike Bosi Review Item Review Item Review Item Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending Review Item Completed Completed 01/13/20224:11 PM Completed 01/14/2022 5:34 PM Completed 01/18/2022 9:32 AM 01/27/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 3 3.A.a Cother County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JANUARY 27, 2022 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL-20210001771; 6761 SABLE RIDGE LN PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Dennis & Amanda Weinman 6761 Sable Ridge Ln Naples F134109 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Jessica Klutz Davidson Engineering 4365 Radio Road Suite 201 Naples F134104 To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for a variance from Section 4.02.01, of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) to reduce the minimum rear yard setback on the north side from 75 feet to 20 feet for a proposed guest house. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 6761 Sable Ridge Lane in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of this petition is to request a 55' reduction from the northern rear yard setback, 75- foot requirement to 20-feet, for a proposed guest house. The home was purchased by the current owners in 2018, and the baseball field was completed behind the home sometime in 2019. Now the owners want to build a guest house beyond the baseball field, thus needing a variance to locate the guest house beyond the baseball field. VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -1- Packet Pg. 4 (aDuel.len a6P!N algeS ALL W00 MUM : 9060Z) elgeS M9 INOdBN ddd1S do :IUOWLIOeUV z 0 W h G - r j M W M �-��k�lllll�lllllllllllllllllr� � III�r €Iflll EIlI1il ,peer ,II h I IH%f lilll l __ 11111111 All ��✓�1- == �� :�IIIIIIIIIIIi1=� _�.. �Y151" W IIIIIIIIIlIIlIIIIIII k�r �i� 1� 11 hl l!I Illsllll�lllllF. IlIII€►� Y� ■� Q i 0 N O U J r ti r Q Q 0 r N CD CV J CL L tlJ C 0 IZ 1 VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -2- 3.A.a 2r-3 ...... ...... ", � I � I I i i I I I � I I � I I ,- I � I� ------------------- PRCPM uxc � SABLE RIDGE LN-VVEINMAN VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -3- Packet Pg. 6 3.A.a SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is zoned Estates (E): North: Single-family residential, zoned Estates (E) zoning district East: Single-family residential, zoned Estates (E) zoning district South: Single-family residential, zoned Estates (E) zoning district West: Single-family residential, zoned Estates (E) zoning district VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -4- Packet Pg. 7 3.A.a GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Estates Designation on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests, but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the petitioner seeks a 55' Variance for the rear yard for a proposed guest house. The subject use is consistent with the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: The single-family residence was built between 2006 and 2008 and received a Certificate of Occupancy in 2008. The current home is 4,641 square feet. The first portion of the baseball field was completed in 2013. The current owners bought the property in 2018 and in sometime in 2019 the baseball field was completed. The owners now want to build a proposed guest house of approximately 1,010 square feet which will comply with all of Collier County's Land Development Code (LDC) 5.03.03. LDC 5.03.03 states that the guest house may not be utilized for commercial purposes, leasing or renting guest accommodation separate from the home is not permitted. LDC 5.03.03 also provides dimensional standards for guest houses and criteria for the lots to allow a guest house. Parcels where guest houses are permitted must be at least 43,560 square feet, 105' in lot width, maximum floor area of the guest house shall be 40 percent of the air-conditioned enclosed living area of the principal dwelling unit. The owners would like to keep a 15' vegetated buffer between the baseball field and the proposed guest house and therefore need a reduction of 55' from the required 75' rear setback. The decision to grant a Variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. The applicant has provided their responses to the criteria, which are provided in italics, followed by the Zoning Division's assessment. a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? The existence of the baseball diamond creates a unique challenge on the property to preserve the sports facility while fulfilling a need for a second residence to house the property owner's mother. This diamond is utilized frequently by the property owner and their young children for both recreation and as part of their homeschooling for safe training and physical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the owners would feel much safer having an aging family member living on the property, so this guesthouse is proposed to be constructed for the property owner's mother so that she may live with the family while retaining independence. The use of a variance for a 20' rear setback will allow for the care of a family member while not disrupting the children's use of the baseball diamond as part of physical education and socialization. VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -5- Packet Pg. 8 3.A.a The position of the home and baseball field creates a problem to add an additional guest house. The home sits approximately 190' back from the Sable Ridge Lane easement. The first 75' is the required setback and then most of the remaining front yard is occupied by a septic system and the drain field. In the backyard the home has a deck and pool area as well as an entire regulation sized baseball field. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? The applicant purchased the property with the home with a partial baseball diamond already erected on the property with partial clearing as well, as can be seen in historic aerials prior to 2018. This was not done with a future guest house in mind, thus when the sports field was completed so that full games could be played, it reached further back than the currently required rear yard setback for structures. A portion of the baseball field was completed by a prior owner; however, the current owners did expand it and now need a variance in order to allow the proposed guest house behind the baseball diamond. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? • Yes, the existing required rear yard setback of 75' creates a difficult situation in which a sufficiently sized accessory dwelling cannot be constructed on the property while preserving the functionality of existing sports facilities located on the property utilized in the children's schooling. Placing a guest house in conformance with the rear setback per the zoning code is a practical difficulty if the baseball field and deck location are to remain as currently positioned on the property. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety, and welfare? Yes, it will allow for the construction of an accessory dwelling with approximately a 1, 010 square foot footprint while not interfering with recreational uses on the property. The accessory dwelling will be constructed approximately 15' North of the end of the baseball field, providing a small necessary landscaping buffer between the residence and sports facility. This allows for a 20' rear yard to the property line. The distance from the rear property line to the existing dwelling on the property to the North of this parcel is approximately 375'. Yes, the variance if granted will be the minimum required to allow for the guest house to be included and will not be detrimental to health, safety, and welfare. North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District has no objection to this variance as long as the condition listed below is approved. VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -6- Packet Pg. 9 3.A.a The Proposed house does not have a car driveway access it will only have a pedestrian golf cart access. Therefore, the fire department and the applicant have agreed that the guest house will have a fire sprinkler system. (See Attachment C for letter from North Collier Fire Control) e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? • No, other properties in the zoning district may construct an accessory dwelling while retaining a useful recreational space on the property if so desired. Some adjacent properties have accessory dwellings which were able to fit on the property without disrupting the use of the property. The guest house will be compliant with LDC 5.03.03. in that it will not be utilized for commercial purposes, and it meets the site standard requirements. The subject property is larger than 43,560 square feet, the lot width is greater than 105 feet, the guest house floor area will not exceed 40% of the enclosed living area of the principal dwelling, and it will be further than 20 feet from the principal dwelling. Yes, by definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. However, LDC Section 9.04.02 provides relief through the Variance process for any dimensional development standard, such as the requested reduced rear yard setback. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case -by -case basis. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Granting the variance will not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to public welfare, there will be a setback behind the dwelling of 20' along with large approximately 65' side yards. Letters of no objection from the neighboring property owners have been included in this application to show that no neighboring property owner feels that granting this variance will be harmful to the community. Should the variance be granted, it will increase public welfare by allowing the children and family to retain their recreational field for baseball games in their backyard and to enhance their education while also permitting an aging family member to live safely on the property while retaining independence. Yes, the LDC generally intends to allow for the types of structures and improvements that are subject of this Variance request. Six letters of no objection from neighboring homeowners have been provided, letters from the north, east, and west properties. (See Attachment B for letters of no objection) g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -7- Packet Pg. 10 • A baseball field that reaches the currently required building setback for rear yard prevents construction of a guesthouse respecting the setbacks without disrupting a frequently used facility by the owner's family for educational and recreational purposes. A professional trainer also utilizes the field for lessons with the owner's family as part of guided physical education for the students that can be completed safely during the current pandemic. Yes, the property to the north and northwest have a pond between the proposed guest house location and the neighboring home's location. In addition, there is vegetation surrounding the guest house location that will ameliorate any potential noise or visual impacts. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP? • Yes, this variance will be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. It does not interfere with the density standards set forth in the GMP for the Estates designation in the Urban Golden Gates Estates Sub -Element and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres exclusive of guesthouses, and this is retained in the variance. The GMP is silent to the issuance of a variance application and therefore the granting of the variance will not be inconsistent with the GMP. PUBLIC NOTICE: The applicant sent a notification letter by mail on September 29, 2021 to nine property owners within 150 feet of the subject site. Public notice was provided about the January 27, 2022 Hearing Examiner Hearing by posting of a public hearing notice sign on the property, mailing of notices to owners within 1,000 feet of the subject site, and publication of a newspaper advertisement at least 15 days prior to the hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner (HEX) approval, Petition VA- PL20210001771 Sable Ridge Ln Variance to reduce the rear setback to 20' for the proposed guest house, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Guest house will need to be equipped with a fire sprinkler system subject to a field inspection. Attachments: A. Conceptual Site Plan B. Letters of No Objection C. Letter from North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District D. Applicant Back Up Material VA-PL20210001771 (Sable Ridge Ln Variance) Revised: November 3. 2021 -8- Packet Pg. 11 3.A.c To: Thomas Caprio 5781 Sable Ridge LN Naples, FL 34109 a� SUBJECT: Property Located at 57E1 Sable Ridge LN L Naples, FL 34109 > m rn m Dear Madam/Sir My name is Dennis Weinman and l own the subject property referenced above. I am sending you this ti letter to ask for your support with my request to Collier County Zoning Commission to reset my rear o yard setback from 75' to 20'. Currently we are in the process of acquiring all data and documents for our Pre -application meeting and would like to add your letter of non -opposition to our request. N The purpose of this request is so that we may build a mother's quarters on the rear of the property. a There will be no impact caused to any of the adjacent properties. 00 By signing this letter in the non -opposition section below and returning it to me would be greatly appreciated. CD c 0 N O Q Q O Sincerely, _ 0 0 Dennis Weinman ;n m m m c a� E s v �a r I do not appose the setback bei r�-set fr o 20' per Mr. Weinman's request a SIGNED l DATE r� c� t E v R Q Packet Pg. 13 3.A.c To: PI© 38453WI02 Brian Ohlis, Trustee of Brian Ohlis, P.A. 401K Plan Naples, FL 34109 a� SUBJECT: Property located at 6761 Sable Ridge LN > Naples, FL 34109 0Cn m Dear Madam/Sir ti My name is Dennis Weinman and I own the subject property referenced above. I am sending you this o letter to ask for your support with my request to Collier County Zoning Commission to reset my rear N yard setback from 75' to 20'. Currently we are in the process of acquiring all data and documents for our N Pre -application mteeting and would like to add your letter of non -opposition to our requesa The purpose of this request is so that we may build a mother's quarters on the rear of the property. There will be no impact caused to any of the adjacent properties. By signing this letter in the non -apposition section below and returning it to me would be greatly N appreciated. _ 0 N O Q Q O _ Sincerely, c w 0 N L Dennis Weinman a� m _ aD E s v �a r Q w I do not oppose the setback being re -set from 75' to 20' per Mr. Weinman's request SIGNED rL� 76;oUn, .-- DATE JV - - Q Packet Pg. 14 3.A.c To: PID 38453640005 Brian & Amanda Ohlis Naples, FL 34109 SUBJECT: Property Located at 6761 Sable Ridge LN Naples, FL 34109 Clear Madam/Sir My name is Dennis Weinman and 1 own the subject property referenced above. I am sending you This letter to ask for your support with my request to Copier County Zoning Commission to reset my rear yard setback from 75' to 20'. Currently we are in the process of acquiring all data and documents for our Pre -application meeting and would like to add your letter of non -opposition to our request. The purpose of this request is so that we may build a mother's quarters on the rear of the property. There will be no impact caused to any of the adjacent properties. By signing this letter in the non -opposition section below and returning it to me would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Dennis Weinman 1 do not Oppose the setback being re -set from 75' to 20' per Mr. Weinman's request SIGNED DATE j J 'Z)o l Packet Pg. 15 3.A.c To: PID 39453680007 RY10111111.7,1;14:11111VIRICURf1i111911101.1" a� SUBJECT: Property Located at 6761 Sable Ridge LN > Naples, FL 341139 rn a� Dear Madam/Sir ti My name is Dennis Weinman and 1 own the subject property referenced above. I am sending you this o letter to ask for your support with my request to Collier County Zoning Commission to reset my rear N yard setback from 75' to 20'. Currently we are in the process of acquiring all data and documents for our N Pre -application meeting and would like to add your letter of non -opposition to our request. a The purpose of this request is so that we may build a mother's quarters on the rear of the property. co There will be no impact caused to any of the adjacent properties. eo, 0 By signing this letter in the ncn-opposition section below and returning it to me would be greatly appreciated. c 0 N O Q Q O _ Sincerely, c° 0 L Dennis Weinman m c a� E s v �a r Q w I do not appose the setback being re -set from 75' to 20' per Mr. Weinman's request SIGNED 7 DATES 1 Q Packet Pg. 16 3.A.c To: Fabian &Jana 0d5tr1ilik 6790 Sandalwood LN Naples, FL 34!(19 5UB]ECi: Property Located at 6761 Sable Ridge LN Napim FL 347A9 Dear Madam/Sir My name is Dennis Weinman and I awn the subject property referenced above_ 1 am sending you this letter to ask for your support with my request to Collier County Zoning Commission to reset my rear yard setback from 75' to 2CY. Currently we are in the process Of acquiring all data and documents for our Pre -application meeting and would like to add your letter, of non -opposition to our request. The purpose of this request is so that we may build a mother's quarters on the rear of the property_ There will be no impact caused to any of the adjacent properties. By signing this letter in the non -opposition section below and returning it to me would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Dennis Weinman I do not 0' per Mr_ Weeii}nma%n's request `TJXaiE v� ��f L` / d c R �L R m ti 0 0 0 N 0 N J a 00 0 0 0 N C O N O a a O O O U) L N [0 c d E s v �a r Q c m E t U R Packet Pg. 17 3.A.c To: Gladys K Lewis Trust 230 Pine Key LN Naples, FL 34109 SUBJECT: Property Located at 6761 Sable Ridge LN Maples, FL 34109 ❑ear Madarn/Sir My name is Dennis Weinman and 1 own the subject property referenced above. I am sendingyau this letter to ask for your support with my request to Collier County Zoning Commission to reset my rear yard setback from 75'to 20'. Currently we are in the process of acquiring all data and documents for our Pre -application meeting and would like to add your letter of non -opposition to our request. The purpose of this request is so that we may build a mother's quarters on the rear of the property. There will be no impact caused to any of the adjacent properties. By signing this letter in the non -opposition section below and returning it to me would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Dennis Weidman I do not oppose the setback being re -set from 75'to 20' per Mr. Weinman's request 6-1-41>Ys K. LE wrS TR D7 b 4e -2 20 51GNE€]S-. Tfee_ DATEJ7--- 7-daAZ d c R m rn m ti 0 0 0 N 0 N J a 0 0 0 0 N c 0 N 0 a a 0 0 0 U) m m m c d E s v �a r Q c m E U M Packet Pg. 18 3.A.d r�AVroSC3N �r•rc,rr.iP[Rrrvc9 ESTABLISHED November 8, 2021 Civil Engineering • Planning * Permitting Oesigning-xcellence North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District m U c Attn: Sean Lintz, Battalion Chief of Life Safety •� (239) 552-1373 > sLintz northcoilierfire.com, a, Re. 6761 Sable Ridge Ln setback Variance m Chief Lintz: to This letter is in reference to the fire comment received during the review of the Setback Variance r ti ti c application request (PL20210001771). The comment is to 'provide Fire access to the proposed unit' c located at 6761 Sable Ridge Lane to reduce the rear setback. N In lieu of providing a driveway access within 150 feet of the proposed guest house, located on the North 0 N ii end of the property, we would propose equipping the building with a fire sprinkler system. The proposed co guest house will have a pedestrian/golf cart access from the property's main driveway to the guest unit, rn 0 N We acknowledge/recognize not providing adequate fire access to the proposed guest house has created v the potential for a delayed response from the Fire/EMS department. u- APPROVED U Z Sincerely, @ailellon Chief Sean Lititz Y North Collier ire Control c L & Rescue District Dennis Weinman Owner4 DATE a)Property J V STATE OF FLORIDA .r c COUNTY OF COLLIER SWORN TO and subscribed before me by means of physical presence or ❑ online notarization this IV14,day cs Q of _ -Ni-oN t r.,)g t,r 2021, by 0 k, % `_ i ', nSuch person(s) r Notary Public must check applicable box: m E Lare personally known to me. U R r ❑ produced her current driver license. Q ❑ produced as identification. 90NNiE LAPOSA Notary Public Notary Publla-Mafyland Carroll County Printed Name of Notary: L r)nn i L Lu:?oS L. My Commis ion Expires Commission Number: 1 '' - 7-7'S My Commission Expires: 1 Q - O Z. - Z 0 Z 4365 Radio Road it Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P: 239.434.6M • www.davldsonengineering.com Packet Pg. 19 Dennis Weinman 6761 Sable Ridge Ln. Naples FI. Re: Setback Variance Mr. Weinman November 15, 2021 I am in receipt of your formal letter requesting to deviate from the FFPC 1: Chapter 18, 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. I am approving this deviation as proposed within your formal request. Although we do not have single family authority per the FFPC/FI. Statue to mandate fire sprinkler systems, do respect your commitment to fire sprinklers in your new guest house. I would like to request this fire sprinkler system be subject to field inspection, to ensuring these conditions to be true. Please submit a copy of this approval to Collier County Building Department/North Collier District Fire and Rescue Plans Review with your corrections for official recording. Any deviation from this proposed design and approval will result in a void of this agreement. Sean Lintz Battalion Chief of Life Safety/Fire Marshal North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District 6495 Taylor Road Naples, FL 34109 239-597-9227 https://northcollierfire.com NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PREVENTION 6495 Taylor Road Naples, FL 34109 r (239) 597-9227 ■ northcollierfire.com as c a� a� Cn r ti ti 0 0 0 r N 0 N J a- 00 0 rn 0 N Packet Pg. 20 3.A.e CPC PACKAGE CHECKLIST FOR APPLICANTS/AGENTS Return this form with printed materials (FOR PUDS) Please check each item as a method for tracking that all required data is included in the printed packets of information for the Collier County Planning Commission Board Members. DO NOT INCLUDE A COPY OF THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE. COUNTY ATTORNEY INCLUDES THIS IN THE ORDINANCE. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. Backup provided by Applicant: Include a CD Disk with only one pdf file for all documents in the same order as the packets are put together. They must be in the same order. —x_ Application —x_ Narrative of rezone request —x_ Property Information —x_ Property Ownership and general description of site Disclosure of Interest Affidavit of Unified Control _x_ Affidavit of Representation NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and/or summary) Traffic Impact Study (TIS) x Environmental Data Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver Utility Letter x Deviation Justifications —x_ Boundary Survey PUD Ordinance (the *last submitted Ordinance with strikethrough — color preferred) Other documents, as needed, on a case -by -case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. 3 thumbnail drives of audio and/or video of Neighborhood Information Meeting I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for all copies of backup materials to provide to the CCPC and the CD must contain the documents in one pdf file (not multiple files) in the same order as the printed materials. It is the agent's respo sibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 12/23/2021 Signature of Agent Representative Date Jessica Kluttz Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Created May 11, 2017 Provide to Agents G:\CDESPlanningServices\Current\Zoning Staff Information\lobAides orHelp Guides Packet Pg. 21 3.A.e Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER To be completed by staff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Dennis & Amanda Weinman Name of Applicant if different than owner: Jim Clifford Address: 6761 Sable Ridge Lane City: Naples Telephone: 239-825-4716 Cell: E-Mail Address: Jim@cliffordconst.com Name of Agent: Jessica Kluttz Firm: Davidson Engineering Address: 4365 Radio Rd Ste 201 Telephone: 239-434-6060 Cell: State: Florida Zip: 34109 Fax: City: Naples State: Florida Zip: 34104 E-Mail Address: JessicaK@davidsonengineering.com Fax: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 4/27/2018 Pa packet Pg. 22 3.A.e Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier,eov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 38453441000 Subdivision: Golden Gate Estate Section/Township/Range:? /49 /26 Unit: 35 Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: See Attached Legal Description Total Acreage: 2.5 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 6761 FL 34109 Sable Ridge Lane Naples, ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N E Single Family S E Single Family E E Single Family W E Single Family Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 75 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No ■❑ Side: 30 Waterfront Lot: Rear: 75 Yes ❑ No ❑■ Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 23 3.A.e Gorier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ASSOCIATIONS 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: N/A Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: City: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 24 3.A.e Gorier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No If yes, please provide copies. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 25 3.A.e Gorier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ❑ ✓Li Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 ✓ ❑ Project Narrative ❑ ❑✓ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ✓ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ✓El Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 ✓ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 ❑✓ ❑ Deeds/Legal's 3 ✓❑ Location map 1 ✓ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 ❑✓ ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 ❑ ✓ Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 ❑✓ ❑ Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ❑✓ ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 26 3.A.e Co*ieY county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier�ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ial Review JBayshore/Gateway City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director kalee Water/Sewer District Vc Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan and Recreation: David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart [� Other: ❑ 1. FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 h' Variance Petition: o Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00 0 5'" and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee Ll Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 J After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee ❑ Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Zoning Division ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ��pSignature Printed Name -e,e-,g �z , ate 4/27/2018 Page 6) of 6 Packet Pg. 27 3.A.e DAVIDSON f hk (. i N i' , f, : rA C, EZiTAaLI19HIED October 11, 2021 To: From: Reviewed By: Subject: Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting 11 1I • : _ � V Collier County Growth Management Division Jessica Kluttz Tocia Hamlin Variance Petition for 6761 Sable Ridge Lane esigning xcellence This memo contains responses to the Nature of Petition questions and first review comments as part of a Variance Petition for 6761 Sable Ridge Lane, Naples FL 34109 Folio number 38453441000. 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. Response: The existing structures on the property include a 4,641 square foot residential home, a 4,327 square foot brick deck, swimming pool, spa, and baseball diamond which covers most of the rear yard, ending 75' South of the North property line. The property owner would like to construct an accessory dwelling guest house of size and design in compliance with LDC section 5.03.03 with a rear yard setback of 20'. This is so that the baseball diamond can be preserved while still allowing for the construction of an accessory dwelling. Thus, a variance is requested to lower the requirement of a 75' rear yard setback to 20'. The property was purchased by Dennis & Amanda Weinman on July 18, 2018 per the Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller, Collier County Florida. The existing principal structure was built in 2008 under permit number 0602-2922 with a CO date of 02129108. The pool was constructed under permit number 0612-0009 with a CO date of 02129108. A partial baseball diamond was existing on the subject site at the time of purchase, and the diamond was completed to be regulation size with a partial outfield in 2020. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 4365 Radio Road • Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P: 239.434.6060 • www.davidsonengineering.com Packet Pg. 28 3.A.e DE DAVIDSON E N G I N E E R I N G Response: Site alterations will include the required land clearing for the construction of the guest house. A small pathway will be constructed from the front driveway to the guest house to accommodate a golf cart. The guest house will be two stories at approximately 24.5 feet in height and have a footprint of approximately 1010 square feet. See attached plans for the guest house design, there will however be no basement or elevator included. Land clearing is required for this construction, environmental analysis has shown that this will not involve any wetlands removal as on the North 0.25 acres of the site there is no presence of jurisdictional wetlands, only uplands. For more detail, please refer to the attached Wetland Determination, 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. Response: The existence of the baseball diamond creates a unique challenge on the property to preserve the sports facility while fulfilling a need for a second residence to house the property owner's mother. This diamond is utilized frequently by the property owner and their young children for both recreation and as part of their homeschooling for safe training and physical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the owners would feel much safer having an aging family member living on the property, so this guesthouse is proposed to be constructed for the property owner's mother so that she may live with the family while retaining independence. The use of a variance for a 20' rear setback will allow for the care of a family member while not disrupting the children's use of the baseball diamond as part of physical education and socialization. b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. Response: The applicant purchased the property with the home with a partial baseball diamond already erected on the property with partial clearing as well, as can be seen in historic aerials prior to 2018. This was not done with a future guest house in mind, thus when the sports field was completed so that full games could be played, it reached further back than the currently required rear yard setback for structures. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. 2 Packet Pg. 29 3.A.e DE DAVIDSON E N G I N E E R I N G Response: Yes, the existing required rear yard setback of 75' creates a difficult situation in which a sufficiently sized accessory dwelling cannot be constructed on the property while preserving the functionality of existing sports facilities located on the property utilized in the children's schooling. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. Response: Yes, it will allow for the construction of an accessory dwelling with approximately a 1,010 square foot footprint while not interfering with recreational uses on the property. The accessory dwelling will be constructed approximately 15' North of the end of the baseball field, providing a small necessary landscaping buffer between the residence and sports facility. This allows for a 20' rear yard to the property line. The distance from the rear property line to the existing dwelling on the property to the North of this parcel is approximately 375'. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. Response: No, other properties in the zoning district may construct an accessory dwelling while retaining a useful recreational space on the property if so desired. Some adjacent properties have accessory dwellings which were able to fit on the property without disrupting the use of the property. The guest house will be compliant with LDC 5.03.03. in that it will not be utilized for commercial purposes, and it meets the site standard requirements. The subject property is larger than 43,560 square feet, the lot width is greater than 105 feet, the guest house floor area will not exceed 40% of the enclosed living area of the principal dwelling, and it will be further than 20 feet from the principal dwelling. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Response: Granting the variance will not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to public welfare, there will be a setback behind the dwelling of 20' along with large approximately 65' side yards. Letters of no objection from the neighboring property owners have been included in this application to show that no neighboring property owner feels that granting this variance will be harmful to the community. Should the variance be granted, it will increase public welfare by allowing the children and family to retain their recreational field for baseball games in their back yard and to enhance their education while also permitting an aging family member to live safely on the property while retaining independence. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. 3 Packet Pg. 30 3.A.e DE DAVIDSON E N G I N E E R I N G Response: A baseball field that reaches the currently required building setback for rear yard prevents construction of a guesthouse respecting the setbacks without disrupting a frequently used facility by the owner's family for educational and recreational purposes. A professional trainer also utilizes the field for lessons with the owner's family as part of guided physical education for the students that can be completed safely during the current pandemic. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Response: Yes, this variance will be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. It does not interfere with the density standards set forth in the GMP for the Estates designation in the Urban Golden Gates Estates Sub -Element and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per2.25 gross acres exclusive of guesthouses, and this is retained in the variance. Response to county comments: 1. Zoning Review a) On the application for the land use section please correct the neighboring land uses (i.e. single family residential, vacant etc). Response: Acknowledged. b) On the justification letter please explain/justify why the proposed guest house cannot be located in front of the existing home. Response: The existing home currently utilizes approximately half of the front yard for a septic system, and the yard serves as a drain field, so there would not be enough space to accommodate a guest house as well as the septic and drain field uses in the front yard. c) Per 10.03.06.F.2 please send out the agent letter to property owners within 150' and provide an affidavit of compliance. Response: Acknowledged, the Affidavit of Compliance is submitted as "Attachment H". 4 Packet Pg. 31 a SL-I w p a z Z ? 1 = z J J 2 p W O O p K ?� m LU Q J H m F z z Q uai m y r_ _ mo a j W Z W W. W J ca cn Mm r z J J J p O (7 n O p 3 � m Q W uw p J J z m r Q N N m _ Oil NOISONIAII 0I0 ON NOlSONIAII M e OT '.A ew. aFl � O,wa 3.A.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20210002604 1 Dennis and Amanda Weinman (print name), as property owner (title, if applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser and that: I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. Well authorize Davidson Engineering to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including I through 2 above. "Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres, or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L. C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, l declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it a e true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I I I S- a<�' Dite The foregoing i,nsument was acknowleged before me by means of Erphysical presence or online notarization this day of J VpL % 20_�J by (printed name of owner or qualifier) L�.y Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me 171 Has produced a current drivers license E] Has produced as identification Notary Signature: �� r 'S JAMES CLIFFORD MY UWWSSION # GG 320195 'o•'' WIRES. May11, 2023 B0n4ed17WU oWVPubkLhderWrXM CP\08-Co A-00115\15s REV 3/4/2020 Packet Pg. 33 Co)�er Count y 3.A.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the C C CILCIILCIKU UI JUL[I IIILUICbL. Name and Address % of Ownership Dennis & Amanda Weinman 100 1 6761 Sable Ridge Lane Naples, FL 34109 1 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ercentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 34 Ole* County 3.A.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the E N f 9. Cl ICI AI C 1 IUD VI III III LCU FJdJ LI ICE ]. Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the tticers, stockholders, beneticiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired 7/18/201 S ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 35 Cor county 3.A.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option• Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 36 3.A.e 6761 SABLE RIDGE LN Legal Description: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 35 E 165FT OF TR 50 Section 7, Township 49, Range 26 Packet Pg. 37 3.A.e �► EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMAL WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT INFORMATION PARCEL INFORMATION Client Name: Dennis Weinman Mailing Address: 6761 Sable Ridge Lane Naples, FL 34109 Phone: (443) 286-4004 Owner Name: Dennis & Amanda Weinman Property Address: 6761 Sable Ridge Lane Naples, FL 34109 Property FOLIO/STRAP: 38453441000 County: OCollier ❑Lee [--]Other Email: dweinman(cD-comcast.net Total Acres Assessed: 0.25 Ac Previously Inspected for Wetlands by FDEP/USACOE: DYes ❑ No ❑ Unknown PARCEL WETLAN D\U PLAN D SUMMARY Parcel Contains Jurisdictional Wetlands: ❑YesElNo Approx. Upland Coverage: 0.25 Acres* Approx. Wetland Coverage: 0 Acres* Wetland Quality❑ High ❑Average ❑ Low 0 N / A (Upland) Permitting Notes: Subject Property is mostly developed with a strip of uplands (0.25 Ac) in the northern portion. *Upland/Wetland coverages exclude the road right of way This informal wetland determination was conducted by Earth Tech Environmental in accordance with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) wetland delineation criteria. All findings and conclusions are informal and non -binding until formally verified by all applicable agencies. Date: July 9, 2021 Determination conducted by: e"6" R Title: Environmental Consultant E-mail: courtneyr@eteflorida.com Savarxalc e Environmental Consultant savanahc@eteflorida.com Wetland Permitting& Offsite Mitigation Options (dependent upon thefutureuse oftheproperty) Authorization(s) from FDEP (State) and/or USACOE (Federal) must be obtained before impacting any wetlands. FDEP ERP General Permit —Wetland Impacts must be less than 4,000 sq. ft. (0.091 Ac) within isolated wetlands, and lot split prior to July 1st, 1994 (offsite mitigation fee not required). Application Fee is required. This type of permit takes up to 30-60 days for issuance (FDEP). FDEP ERP Individual Permit— Wetland Impacts are greater than 4,000 sq. ft. (0.091 Ac), or within connected wetlands, or lot was split after July 1st, 1994 (offsite mitigation fee required). The mitigation fees are directly proportional to the total area of wetland impacts and wetland function. Application fee is required. This type of permit takes up to 2-6 months (FDEP). Wetland Impact\mitigation options are shown below. -Wetland Impacts Less than 0.33 Acres: Offsite mitigation fees are calculated at a reduced rate based on wetland function within unavoidable wetlands (UMAM OR WRAP). -Wetland Impacts Greater than 0.33 Acres: In addition to the reduced rate of the first 0.33 Acres (see above), additional wetland impacts are then calculated at a 1:1 ratio for Offsite mitigation fees. FDEP State 404 Permit - Wetland impacts beyond 300' from Federally Retained Waters and wetlands are classified as Waters of United States (WOTUS). offsite mitigation fees required (typically same as FDEP). This type of permit can take 6 to 9 months and may require public notice & USFWS consultation. ALOE Section 404 Permit— Wetland impacts within 300' from Federally Retainied Waters. Offsite mitigation fees required (typically same as FDEP). This permit has no set deadline for review/issuance and may require public notice & USFWS consultation. Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com Packet Pg. 38 3.A.e S ak ci ` • 1 ` i, "e 1 i +i r rn O N d Q O E o � _�_{ � i � � r � xlr• Y c 2 '.. i'• .gip ++ Z E U ,.i., w Note: Q Subject Property (2.5 Ac, p 2021 Aerial &Subject Property boundary ,p obtained from Collier County Property Appraiser - }; ,.• ^�A: y + rya, Assessed area (0.25 Ac) 100 50 0 Details U • Sample Points Lu Feet �E Lu y Project Map Type Date — Dennis Weinman - 38453441000 - 6761 Sable Ridge Lane . Collier County, Florida Aerial Map 7/9/21 Packet Pg. 39 EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC 10600 JOLEA AVENUE BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 PHONE (239) 304-0030 WWW.ETEFLORI Ic I I I I II I 11I I 1I 1I I I11111§denotes the Rule11111111111112 I 15 II II$ 9 10II !1I IIII IICII I11111111 I1113l I1111 II III4 5 3.A.e paragraph, or s FDEP SLERC August 2019 Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form referenced from Ch. 62-340, F.A.C. 1. Date: Jul 7, 2021 2. Staff Present: Courtney Ramsey, Savanah Ceilley 3. Form record er(s): Both 4. County: Collier (11) 5. Site Name: 6761 Sable Ridge Lane Tracking #: 38453441000 6. Point ID: Sample Point 1 GPS Coordinates: 26.36766,-81.77773 7. Distances and bearings from fixed objects (if no GPS): 8. Current condition of described point: C: Authorized or legal condition C Unauthorized or illegal condition 9. Work type: C' Identification C: Delineation Point status: C' Wetland C' Non -Wetland Surface Water t: Upland 10. Vegetative Stratum §62-340.400: Using §62-340.400, F.A.C. with reasonable scientific judgment, select the appropriate vegetative stratum. (Do not include FAC species when determining 10% minimum areal extent.) o AL (9 Canopy (Min. 10% areal extent) C` Subcanopy (Min. 10% areal extent) C' Groundcover (No min. areal exter C' Vegetation Absent (skip to #14) C' Evaluation Impossible (skip to #14) Why? 11. Plant List §62-340.200(2),(6),(16), §62-340.400, §62-340.450, F.A.C.: Areal extent As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: estimator: 30 ft as Select and identify plants in an area just large enough to represent and classify the plant community at the described point Do not extend into different communities or hydrologic conditions. 3. For each species present in the r 1. Record the scientific name (binomial) 2. Record the percent areal stratum selected in #10, transi r- and status of each plant species extent in the canopy, the numbers from only that c necessary to identify/delineate and classify subcanopy, and groundcover stratum's column into the o the plant community in the selected area. columns for each species. appropriate status columns. c # Binomial of Observed Species Status Canopy Subcanopy Groundcover Upland Facultative Fac. Wet N Oblige a 1. Serenoa repens (Saw palmetto) U 35 00 2. Pinus elliottii (Slash pine) U 15 15 c 3. Acacia auriculiformis (Earleaf acacia) F 20 3 3 20 N 4. Lyonia ferruginea (Rusty lyonia) U 5 A 2 5. Myrsine cubana (Myrsine) F 2 1 2 +; 6. Taxodium distichum (Bald cypress) O 2 1 2 E 7. Nephrolepis exaltata (Sword fern) F 1 Y 8. Spermacoce verticillata (Shrubby false buttonweed) 1 cva 9. Morella cerifera (Wax myrtle) F 3 10. Persea palustris (Swamp bay) O 1 1 11. a 12. c 13. 14. E 15. 1 o 16. a 17. 18. s 19. 20. a Percent areal extent totals for the stratum selected in question 10 15 22 0 2 12. In the stratum selected in #10: What is the % areal extent of Obligate plants? 2 What is the % areal extent of Upland plants? 15 Is the areal extent of Obligate plants greater than that of Upland plants? C' Yes G No 13. In the stratum selected in #10: What is the total % areal extent of Obligate & Facultative Wet plants combined? 2 What is the total % areal extent of Obligate, Facultative Wet, & Upland plants combined? 17 What is the percentage of OBL + FACW in relation to all plants, excluding FAC? (o OBFacw uP�) 11.8% Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effectiv Packet Pg. 40 Point ID/Location:26.36766,-81.77773 Soil describe 3.A.e 14. LRR/MLRA U I Textures: Peat, Mucky Peat, Muck, Mucky Mineral (S or F), Sand, Fine, Marl 15. Is a soil profile evaluation possible? (: Yes (' No If no, why? (if No, skip to #1 16. Soil Description: As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alteratio Soil surface, or 0 inch depth for purposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. is the muck or mineral surface (whether natural or for sandy ' Describe soil features: DA (areas darker than matrix), LA (areas lighter than matrix), beginning moist matrix RC (redox concentrations): Record in moist condition hue value/chroma; volume in /o to ending Matrix condition horizons w/ horizon; boundaries (sharp/clear/diffuse); shape (rounded/linear/angular). Horizon Depth Texture Matrix < value _ 3: _ OB (organic bodies): Record texture (muck or mucky mineral), % volume in horizon. H2S Indicate depth detected (inches) Hue Value/ % Organic _ shallowest where (hydrogen sulfide odor): "Texture: Chroma Coating _ Note if horizon is Physically Mixed (PM), Nonsoil (any material not listed in above), or Fill and describe. Sandy 10YR 0-4 4/1 > 2 4-11 Sandy 16 YR DA: 10YR 4/1; 5%; clear; rounded rn 3 ti 0 0 o_ 4 N 0 J a. 0 0 5 rn 0 N N f� 'L 6 d E Q 17. Hydric Soil Field Indicators: If present, check all Hydric Soil Field Indicators satisfied and specify their beginnil 0 All Texture 0 Sandy Texture 0 Fine Texture and ending depths (Al) Histosol* _(S4) Sandy Gleyed Matrix* _(F2) Loamy Gleyed Matrix* Indicator Begin En Present Depth Def (A2) Histic Epipedon* _(S5) Sandy Redox _(F3) Depleted Matrix � (A3) Black Histic* _(S6) Stripped Matrix _(F6) Redox Dark Surface Q- Dark Surface 2. (A4) Hydrogen Sulfide* Depleted Dark Surface a _(S7) _(F7) (A5) Stratified Layers* Polyvalue Below Surface Redox Depression 3. _(S8) _(F8) _(A6) Organic Bodies _(S9) Thin Dark Surface _(F10) Marl 4. 5cm Mucky Mineral* Barrier Islands 1cm Muck Iron -Manganese Masses 5. _(A7) _(S12) _(F12) Muck Presence* Umbric Surface 6. _(A8) _(F13) _(A9) 1cm Muck* _(F22) Very Shallow Dark Surface Q _(Al 1) Depleted Below Dark Surface * - Stand-alone D Test- both hydric soil To combine layers/indicators to meet thickness (Al2) Thick Dark Surface and hydrologic indicator requirements, see NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Not( E 18. Excluding organic horizons, is any nonsoil horizon present at or within the uppermost 12 inches of the ground surfac( C Yes (e.g. bedrock, rock outcrop, limestone fill, gravel, etc) Ce No C Soil profile or site inaccessible a 19. Is one or more hydric soil field indicators present? C Yes C: No C Inconclusive (e.g., evaluation to 12+ inche If no or inconclusive, is the soil hydric as determined b other NRCS methods? impeded by disturbance, wa Y Y nonsoil, no site access, etc.) C` Yes <-- Which method(s)? C: No C Inconclusive <-- Why? (e.g., hydric soil definition, HSTS2, indicator present at drier elevation, indicator would be present but for disturbance, 20. Is the depth of the soil profile 20 inches or greater from the soil surface? C Yes Co No If no, depth of soil profile is: 11 inches Why? Shovel length did not permit (e.g., root refusal, nonsoil, water table, loose sand, heavy texture, compaction, weather conditions, inspection interrupts 21. Observed height or depth of standing water from soil surface: inches C' Above C1 Below C: Not Observed Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effectiv Packet Pg. 41 Point ID/Location: 26.36766,-81.77773 Indicator evaluato 22. Hydrologic Indicators: As is undercurrent conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations Predicted Within 1. Describe the type of all checked indicators. Hydrologic Indicators Present during 100 ft 2. Approximate the distance and compass direction of per §62-340.500, F.A.C. at or normal waterward indicators within 100 ft of the point. high of point 3. For water level indicators (potential indicators denotec (and as applied to §62-340.600, F.A.C.) point water or (not for by *) note the height from ground surface at the po wet upland as well as waterward (with distance from point). season* points) *Only for indicators not present due to dry season/drouc (1) Algal mats* (2) Aquatic mosses or liverworts* a� (3) Aquatic plants* (4) Aufwuchs (5) Drift lines and rafted debris* (6) Elevated lichen lines* R M (7) Evidence of aquatic fauna (8) Hydrologic data* ti (9) Morphological plant adaptations* o (10) Secondary flow channels 0 N 0 (11) Sediment deposition*CN a. (12) Tussocks or hummocks* 00 (13) Water marks* CD N C, Above Ground Surface C' No Water Level Indicators N Highest water level indicator height at point: inches Above Soil Surface Ce' N/A (described point is Uplan . 23. Is one or more hydrologic indicator(s) listed in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present or predicted with normal high water c wet season conditions at the described point? (' Yes (We No (' Evaluation Impossible E- Why? E a 24. Delineation by Wetland Definition §62-340.300(1), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ' or the legality of any alterations: a) Has a wetland boundary been delineated at the described point? Yes No (if No, skip to #25) b) If yes to 24a, can the boundary be easily delineated using the definition of wetlands? C- Yes C No .Q 25. A & B Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(a),(b), F.A.C. a As is under current conditions, without considering RSJI or the legality of any alterations: a) Is the areal extent of Obligate plants in the stratum selected in #10 greater than the areal extent of all Upland plan in that stratum? (See #12) C` Yes Co- No (` Vegetation Absent (skip to #250 (' Evaluation Impossible (skip to #2( E b) Is the areal extent of Obligate and/or Facultative Wet plants in the stratum selected in #10 equal to or greater the U 20 80% of all the plants in that stratum, excluding Facultative plants? (See #13) Yes No a c) Is the soil hydric as identified using standard NRCS definitions and practices? (see #19) C' Yes C: No Indeterminable with current conditions - Why? E d) Is the substrate composed of riverwash, nonsoil (see #18), rock outcrop -soil complex, or is the substrate located a within an artificially created wetland area? (- Yes (:' No If yes, which condition is present? e) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present at the described point? (See #23) (`Yes (-0 f f) Are the A Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(a), F.A.C. at the described point? Yes No (Note: If yes to 25a and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, A Test criteria are met) g) Are the B Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(b), F.A.C. at the described point? C' Yes (: No (Note: If yes to 25b and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, B Test criteria are met) h) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the A or B Test such that the Altered Situ - Test Test is more appropriate? C` Yes (: No Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effectiv Packet Pg. 42 Point ID/Location: 26.36766,-81.77773 3.A.e 26. C Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. is the described point Pine Flatwoods or Improved Pasture, or does it have drained soils? Yes No If yes, select which of the following are met, then skip to #26d 0 Pine Flatwoods ❑ Improved Pasture ❑ Drained Soils Pine Flatwoods must have flat terrain, a monotypic or mixed canopy of long leaf pine or slash pine, and a ground cover dominated by saw palmetto with other species that are NOT obligate or facultative wet. Improved Pasture means areas where the dominant native plant community has been replaced with planted or natural recruitment of herbaceous species which are N( obligate or facultative wet species and which have been actively maintained for livestock through mechanical means or grazing. Drained Soils are those in which permanent alterations, excluding mechanical pumping, preclude the formation of hydric soils. b) Are the soils at the described point saline sands (salt flats -tidal flats), or have they been field verified by NRCS' Keys to Soil Taxonomy (4th ed. 1990) as Umbraqualfs, Sulfaquents, Hydraquents, Humaquepts, Histosols (exce 2 Folists), Argiaquolls, or Umbraquults? (' Yes (: No > c) Do the soils at the described point have a NRCS hydric soil field indicator (see #17), and is the point located a, within a map unit named or designated by the NRCS as frequently flooded, depressional, or water? Map Unit: Yes (: No (' Inconclusive - Why? (skip to #2; d) Are the C Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. at the described point? Yes (: No (Note: If no to 26a and yes to either 26b or 26c, C Test criteria are met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the C Test such that the Altered Sites TE o is more appropriate? C- Yes C: No g 27. D Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. r c As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a a) Is the soil hydric as verified by a NRCS hydric soil field indicator? (See #17) Yes No (skip to #27d) Inconclusive - Why? (skip to #28) b) Does any NRCS hydric soil field indicator begin at the soil surface or are any of the following indicators presenl CD N Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A8, A9, S4, F2? C- Yes (' No (If yes, then hydrologic indicator §62-340.500(8) or (11) is m c) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present at the described point? (See #23) C- Yes (` I d) Are the D Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. at the described point? Yes No d E (Note: If yes to 27a and yes to either 27b or 27c, D Test criteria may be met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the D Test such that the Altered Sites TE a Y is more appropriate? F Yes No 28. Altered Sites Tests §62-340.300(3), F.A.C. (Legal/Authorized or Illegal/Unauthorized) For purposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. altered refers to any natural or man -induced condition(s) which mask: or eliminates reliable expression of wetland indicators (i.e. hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrolog a indicators). Unaltered or normal does not require a natural condition, only an expression of wetland a indicators that is sufficient to reliably identify or delineate the wetland using the criteria in §62-340.300, F.A. C. o Are alterations affecting normal wetland condition? (' Yes (: No (skip to #32) (` Evaluation Impossible (skip to #; a 29. Authorized or Legally Altered Vegetation and Soils Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(a), F.A.C. a) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable expression of vegetation at the described point? r Yes (` No If yes, how? a b) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable soil evaluation at the described point? ( Yes (' N( If yes, how? (If no to both 29a and 29b, skip to #: E c) If yes to 29a or 29b, which criteria tests are affected by the legal alterations? 0 A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test a d) Using the most reliable available information and reasonable scientific judgment, would the types of evidence an characteristics contemplated in §62-340.300, F.A.C. identify or delineate the described point as a wetland with cessation of the legal altering activities? ('Yes C` No If no, why? (If no, skip to #: e) If yes to 29d, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of legal altering activities? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators f) If yes to 29d, which tests would be passed with cessation of legal altering activities? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effectiv Packet Pg. 43 Point ID/Location:26.36766,-81.77773 L 3.A.e 30. Authorized or Legally Altered Hydrology Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(b), F.A.C. a) Has wetland hydrology of the area been legally drained or lowered? C' Yes C No (if no, skip to #31) If yes, how? b) Has wetland hydrology been legally eliminated at the described point? (- Yes (' No (if no, skip to #31) c) If yes to 30b, using reasonable scientific judgment or §62-340.550, F.A.C., have dredging or filling activities authorized by Part IV of Chapter 373, F.S. permanently eliminated wetland hydrology at the described point su that the wetland definition cannot be met? (`Yes (point is upland) (' No (if yes, skip to #31) Chapter 373, F.S. Part 11 activities (e.g., water use permits) or other temporary hydrologic alterations (e.g., surface water pumps, drought) do not apply to this or any other Ch. 62-340, F.A.C. determinations. d) If no to 30c, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of temporary hydrologic drainage? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators e) If no to 30c, Which tests would be passed with cessation of temporary hydrologic alterations? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 31. Unauthorized or Illegally Altered Sites Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A.C. If the altering activity is a violation of regulatory requirements, then application of §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A. C. anc all provisions of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. are utilized to identify or delineate the wetland in a forensic manner. This identification or delineation reflects the condition immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration. a) Have any unauthorized alterations affected the normal wetland condition at the described point? (' Yes (' N If yes, how? (if no, skip to #3 b) If yes to 31 a, which criteria tests are affected by the unauthorized alterations? ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test c) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland, or would it have been a wetland immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? (' Yes (' No If no, why? (If no, skip to #� d) If yes to 31 c, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or was present immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils 0 Hydrologic indicators e) If yes to 31 c, which tests would be passed immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 32. Wetland and Other Surface Water Summary §62-340.600(2)(a-e), F.A.C.: Given normal expression, cessation of authorized alterations, or immediately prior to any unauthorized alteration a) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland as defined in §62-340.200(19), F.A.C. an located by Ch. 62-340, F.A.C.? (' Yes (: No If yes, which criteria identified or delineated the wetland ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test If summary answers differ from answers in 25f, 25g, 26d, or 27d, why? b) Is the described point located at or within the Mean High Water Line of a tidal water body? (' Yes (-e No F MHWL Unknown c) Is the described point located at or within the Ordinary High Water Line of a non -tidal natural water body or natur watercourse? ('Yes (e No d) Is the described point located at or within the top of the bank of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, ditch, or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes of 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal or steeper, excluding spoil banks when the canals and ditches have resulted from excavation into the ground? (-Yes (* r e) Is the described point located at or within the Seasonal High Water Line of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, diti or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes flatter than 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal an artificial water body created by diking or impoundment above the ground? f Yes (*- No 33. Connection or Isolation of Wetland per Applicant's Handbook Vol.1 Section 2.0 If the described point is a wetland, does it have a connection via wetlands or other surface waters, or is it wholly surrounded by uplands and therefore isolated? (' Connected (' Isolated (* N/A (Point is not wetlan Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effectivi Packet Pg. 44 Point ID/Location: 26.36766,-81.77773 3.A.e 34. Photographs and/or videos: Soil profile with Data Form, Soil profile close-up, Cross section(s) at 6" depth for sandy textures and/or critical depths for fine textures, Hydric soil indicators, Water table or inundation depth, Four cardinal directions of plant strata present, Hydrologic indicators (with scale as necessary), Critical plant ID (optional # Memory Card # / Metadata Description, compass direction (if applicable) Taken 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2 8. 9. m 10. -a 11. � a� 12. � 13. � 14. ti Notes:Subject property is mostly developed with a small strip of uplands in the north. g 0 r N 0 N J d Co 0 CD 0 N Helpful Definitions for Applying Ch 62-340, F.A.C. IRSJ stands for Reasonable Scientific Judgment where used throughout this Data Form (See The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual pg. 2 & 12) 2HSTS stands for Hydric Soils Technical Standard (See NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Note 11) Definition from §62.340.200(19) Florida Administrative Code "Wetlands," as defined in subsection 373.019(17), F.S., means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and a duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils. Soils present in wetlands generally are classified as hydric or alluvial, or possess characteristics that are associated with reducing soil conditions. The prevalent vegetation in wetlands generally consists of facultative or obligate hydrophytic macrophytes that are typically adapted to are having soil conditions described above. These species, due to morphological, physiological, or reproductive adaptations, have the ability to grow, reproduce or persist in aquatic environments or anaerobic soil conditions. Florida wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bayheads, bogs, cypress domes and strands, sloughs, wet prairies, riverine swamps and marshes, hydric seepage slopes, tidal marshes, mangrove swamps and othe similar areas. Florida wetlands generally do not include longleaf or slash pine flatwoods with an understory dominated by saw palmetto. Definition from §373.019(19) Florida Statutes "Surface water" means water upon the surface of the earth, whether contained in bounds created naturally or artificially or diffused. Water from natur springs shall be classified as surface water when it exits from the spring onto the earth's surface. Definition from §373.019(14) Florida Statutes "Other watercourse" means any canal, ditch, or other artificial watercourse in which water usually flows in a defined bed or channel. It is not essentie that the flowing be uniform or uninterrupted. Definition from §62.340.200(15) Florida Administrative Code "Seasonal High Water" means the elevation to which the ground and surface water can be expected to rise due to a normal wet season. From The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual pg. 37 Ordinary high water is that point on the slope or bank where the surface water from the water body ceases to exert a dominant influence on the charact of the surrounding vegetation and soils. The OHWL frequently encompasses areas dominated by non -listed vegetation and non-hydric soils. When the OHWL is not at a wetland edge, the general view of the area may present an "upland" appearance. Definition from §403.803(14) Florida Statutes "Swale" means a manmade trench which: (a) Has a top width -to -depth ratio of the cross-section equal to or greater than 6:1, or side slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertic (b) Contains contiguous areas of standing or flowing water only following a rainfall event; (c) Is planted with or has stablized vegetation suitable for soil stabilization, stormwater treatment, and nutrient uptake; and (d) Is designed to take into acount the soil erodibility, soil percolation, slope, slope length, and drainage area so as to prevent erosion and reduce pollutant concentration of any discharge. Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effectivi Packet Pg. 45 � l f (aauepen aBpIM algeS ULWOOLZOZld : 8060Z) sleuajew dnj3uq tue3Bddy p 1uaw43e14y :luawg3eRV � v3,vE� -ro u i goo eyN � $ E uz m� EO' $ t ti3m2 HUM k m�UW�w�oouW� `_.E€`° oa4E ar6 _� @ i-•-•o��'^,o ._ _ 8 ho E� c2 _ � �v�rtuna n -w £co EEE u n� w �^ Y W �muaz zo°z`�:amo3E z 'ate @ `d m_ ___ _ NCO _ I O b 0 b b 5' {� yV SET&ACK h M i 01 A lI� Z Z U 8 ?9 ,Ld'099 3„IS,O£.00S (N) .69'OZ9 Nld Ol Nld ti J Q m O 2 �U� (W) ,Zb OL9 NO 01 Nld (0) ,91'099 M,60,Ld.00N (d) ,00'09-Q M,tiO,LZ.00N o z c u i gyp' o m (n II _ O 2 w c i r le Ui c u C zo8 � i �� 04,o �moq� H 7a; � way os o�adWa I I O h3?m U n m I � I I � U I I I � � I I � �? U I Q zz zz 71' III SET&4CK O h b b h 1n 30' V) N ROADWAY EASEMENT 3.A.e AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-72, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give notice by mail at least 30 days after receipt of letter indicating that the application is sufficient to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a variance or parking exemption. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change. Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this -R)q day of OCAOb-e g, , 2021 by � t? SS ► C (, K u t z �, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. (Si ature of Notaj Public) r on J. HI1 I Printed Name of Notary Notary Public State of Florida Bonnie J Hill My Commission GG 361215 D wo Expires 07/31/2023 Packet Pg. 48 3.A.e JE DAVIDSON ENGINEERING; ESTABLISHED September 29, 2021 Dennis & Amanda Weinman 6761 Sable Ridge Lane Naples, FL 34109 Dear Property Owner: Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting esigning -xcellence Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: 6761 Sable Ridge Lane Naples, FL 34109 It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to construct a guest house with a rear setback of 20' on the aforementioned property. In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, we will be contacting you directly within the next few days or you may choose to telephone the sender for further information. In any event, please be advised that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, 0 Jessica Kluttz Planner, Davidson Engineering 239.434.6060 4365 Radio Road • Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P: 239.434.6060 • www.davidsonengineering.com Packet Pg. 49 (aauelaen a6plN algeS 4LLWOOLZOZ-ld 8060Z) slepa;ew dnMaeq }ueallddd a ivauayaeuv :;uauayaejjv d � M U) W 0 0 m co r-- N LO O co O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O CD O CD O CD O J t O 00 00 " 't CO N V CO Lf) CO co r— It O M M m M m M m M m LL LO U') lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) lf) 't 't Nt Nt Nt 00 co 00 co 00 co 00 co 00 M M co M co M co M co O Y m W N_ S r.+ r.+ C N N N L Q Q to d 0. W O w V Q � m co o 0 N ood Z N M c r LnLL�LnN 000Ln rn w E 6&v d")M�Crd") 0 0 0 CDQ o o o o o La)� M r CO CO CO LLI CO CO CO CO CO C N C O LL LL LL Q LL LL LL LL LL 'V V C ui C6 C6 2 C6 C6 C6 C6 C y T W W W Z W W W W W y 0 d d d Q d d d d d ywM QQQ�QQQQQ � 3 LO zzz�-zzzzz le Lo L N 00 W m y M s o C Z H 0 = -4 0. 0 o. `° p U J Z U y d +• }' W L co 2 w ) Q O —z T w N _ O Y N O N W W W W Lo C � z Cl) Z Z Z CLCD z J J W J J J J J T Q .r N W W 0 W W W W W ❑❑z❑0❑❑❑❑ = Q G Q} Z J Of W Of W 0- i Z J J Y LL ❑ Q J J J 00 00 W L- Z 00 m m m Z O Q Q Z H Q Q Q Q Q LO C/) Cl) — U) Cl)U) Cl)U) p CDO O o U ;a i m co o r- m m o co L M I-- tiMCpr-tir-_I-r-_ O (fl N (0 (fl (o (D (D U m < J s o Q w ❑ Z ya�am co <U a / 0a O U)❑mod N R O W o2S��0�ZQ�x= R y p Q� j co U J Q Z~ Z ?3 W U Z y J z oo W w- Z❑ 0 W rn O IL =ZJHYQZ}❑ s to H Q Y � j Z ~ O+m}�mmm c Omil�Q"3 ❑ZH=Zi Jw=❑ WO 01 Q z R d UU(DYOOdw� O LO Cb IL r (D Y U R IL U) a) U) Q 3.A.e DAViDSR pCEn�c97N �n�c� E$TABLISHED November 8, 2021 North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District Attn: Sean Lintz, Battalion Chief of Life Safety (239) 552-1373 sLlntz@northcQIlIerfIre.com Re: 6761 Sabie Ridge i! n Setback Variance Chief Lintz: Civil Engineering • Planning 9 Permitting 1?esigning-xcellence This letter is in reference to the fire comment received during the review of the Setback Variance application request (PL20210001771). The comment is to 'provide Fire access to the proposed unit' located at 6761 Sable Ridge Lane to reduce the rear setback. In lieu of providing a driveway access within 150 feet of the proposed guest house, located on the North end of the property, we would propose equipping the building with a fire sprinkler system. The proposed guest house will have a pedestrian/golf cart access from the property's main driveway to the guest unit We acknowledge/recognize not providing adequate fire access to the proposed guest house has created the potential for a delayed response from the Fire/EMS department. Sincerely, Dennis Weinman Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 4- APPROVED Mellon Chief Sean Lintz North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District <L�:= -- DATE SWORN TO and subscribed before me by means of physical presence or ❑ online notarization this d }'day of --NLc,V L rr,l, stir- 2021, by 0 R r%ri ti_ *1 z'. ,,,-0,t%In Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: [,N are personally known to me. ❑ produced her current driver license. ❑ produced Identification. ary St -all BONNIE LAPOSA Notary Public Notary Public -Maryland Carroll County Printed Name of Notary: ac3nn i t_ L_cM:PD5t, My Commission�Expires Commission Number: My Commission Expires: 1Vj - V Z- Z Z 4365 Radio Road • Suite 202 a Naples, Ft. 34104 • P.239.434.6060 • www.davldsonengineering.com Packet Pg. 51 Dennis Weinman 6761 Sable Ridge Ln. Naples FI. Re: Setback Variance Mr. Weinman November 15, 2021 I am in receipt of your formal letter requesting to deviate from the FFPC 1: Chapter 18, 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. I am approving this deviation as proposed within your formal request. Although we do not have single family authority per the FFPC/FI. Statue to mandate fire sprinkler systems, do respect your commitment to fire sprinklers in your new guest house. I would like to request this fire sprinkler system be subject to field inspection, to ensuring these conditions to be true. Please submit a copy of this approval to Collier County Building Department/North Collier District Fire and Rescue Plans Review with your corrections for official recording. Any deviation from this proposed design and approval will result in a void of this agreement. Sean Lintz Battalion Chief of Life Safety/Fire Marshal North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District 6495 Taylor Road Naples, FL 34109 239-597-9227 https://northcollierfire.com NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PREVENTION 6495 Taylor Road Naples, FL 34109 r (239) 597-9227 ■ northcollierfire.com Packet Pg. 52 3.A.e (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER P L202 WO01771 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 IGNATURE OF PLIC STREET OR P.O. BOX Jessica Kluttz NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Naples, FL 34104 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this o23,d day of Dtcam 6-02 , 20_PL, by Sec's t7(c, K W 447, , personally known to me or who produced V v ' as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Nonry Public Stele of flo►ide Bonnie J Hill a My Commission GG 361215 Expires 07/31/2023 My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Sig ture of Notary ub c "9VnrIL3-+ (11 Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 53 r 1. (aauelaen a6plN elgeS UL WOMOZ-1d : 8060Z) slelaa;ew dnMaeq ;ueallddV a ivauayaeuV :;uauayaeu 0-1 a ui u IMM O z r r- N O q�t r- N LO z _i co 0LL U) . . W LU O N co a- Z o �. Q z w N o N zz W a. w 0 o — O f O � 7— Z z rv, z O LLJ Z ah, Q = y U) O �— w O v / w W i- F-- O C O = c� �z (� Q J (p W Cco N — � Q 0 Ict LO Cb a d I a 174 LO LO AO IPIOP a AN _NEW_ 3.B 01/27/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.B Item Summary: Petition No. BDE-PL20210001645 - Request for a 23-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 43 feet into a waterway that is 135 feet wide for the benefit of property is located at 1660 Vinland Way, further described as Lot 14, Landing at Bear's Paw, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commission District 4 Meeting Date: 01/27/2022 Prepared by: Title: Planner — Zoning Name: John Kelly 01/05/2022 5:16 PM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 01/05/2022 5:16 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending Review Item Completed Completed 01/13/2022 4:11 PM Completed 01/18/2022 11:11 AM Completed 01/19/2022 5:07 PM 01/27/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 56 3.B.a Co e-r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION - ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: JANUARY 27, 2022 SUBJECT: BDE-PL20210001645, 1660 VINLAND WAY — PHILLIPS DOCK PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: J. Scott and Bonnie Phillips 1660 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34105 REQUESTED ACTION: AGENT: Jeff Rogers Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 The petitioner requests a 23-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow the addition of a boatlift to an existing boat dock facility that will protrude a total of 43 feet into a waterway that is 135± feet wide, pursuant to Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for the benefit of the subject property. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 1660 Vinland Way, further described as Lot 14, Landings at Bear's Paw, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is located within a residential component of the Landings at Bear's Paw Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 13-66, as amended. Said property comprises 0.24 acres that has been developed with a single-family dwelling and has 69.5 feet of water frontage. The petitioner is proposing to add a boatlift to an existing dock facility to moor a single vessel of up to 30 feet in overall length. Said dock was constructed in accord with Building Permit No.: PRBD20180212105; however, a Certificate of Completion was never obtained. (Continued on Page 3) BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 1 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 57 ()ooa sd!II!4d - AeM PUeIUTA 099� 308 StIMOOLZOZld : ZL60Z) ZZOZSOLO :podam Jje;S :;uauayoe;;y 'i to co "' a r Y V w.' 8 dp Iy�I d, LL f jJ tZ� 0 N LO Nt C� O C) Cal CIA J r Q) n E O ,-f n m IL BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 2 of 9 January 5, 2022 3.B.a Purpose/Description of Project (Continued) Exhibit A of the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD document, Permitted Uses, section c. — Golden Gate Canal (as to the Northern 1/2 of the Golden Gate Canal abutting the project) states: i. Permitted Uses: private recreational single-family boat docks, mooring pilings, boat lifts/davits, and kayak launches to serve residents and their guests. All docks are reserved for the exclusive use of the owners of dwelling units within the RPUD property. No more than ten (10) boat slips may be constructed adjacent to the Amenity Area, no more than two (2) boat slips may be constructed adjacent to each platted single-family water front lot, and no more than thirty-eight (38) slips may be constructed within the project. Except for any deviations listed in this RPUD Document, all docks and boat slips shall be subject to the requirements ofLDC Section 5.03.06 and, to the extent applicable, the Manatee Protection Plan. Exhibit E of the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD Document, List of Deviations, contains the following applicable deviation: 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.06.E.5., "Dock Facilities, " which requires dock facilities to have a side setback of 15 feet for dock facilities on lots with greater than 60 feet of water frontage, to allow a 7.5 foot side setbacks for the private single-family community dock facilities located along that section of Golden Gate Canal within the Residential Tract; provided that such slips are parallel to (rather than perpendicular to) the shoreline. Staff further notes that at the time of site development for the RPUD the developer modified the shoreline to create a rip -rap shoreline extending from the rear property lines into the water body. This modified the MHWL and as a result the property line is a greater distance landward of the MHWL. As such, it was previously determined that for this development that if a dock does not protrude 20 feet past the original controlling MHWL no BDE should be required (See Attachment C). As per a Sketch of Boundary Survey dated 07/25/2018, with a completion date of 09/24/2021, the existing dock facility exceeds the required 7.5-foot side setback requirement established above. Said survey further demonstrates the existing dock facility protrudes 19.5 feet from the Mean High -Water Line (MHWL). The existing dock facility is therefore compliant as it protrudes 19.5 feet from the MHWL. As proposed, incorporating the desired boatlift using a shore parallel design results in a protrusion of 33 feet as measured from the MHWL. However, LDC Section 5.03.06.C.1, Measurement of dock protrusions and extensions, states: Measurement is made from the most restrictive of the following: property line, bulkhead line, shoreline, seawall, rip -rap line, control elevation contour, or mean high water line (MHWL). If measured from the property line, the most restrictive point as per the referenced requirement, the overall protrusion is 431 feet from the most restrictive point. BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 3 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 59 3.B.a LDC Section 5.03.06.C.4. states: The allowable protrusion of the facility into the waterway shall be based on the percentages described in subsection 5.03.06.E.2 of this LDC as applied to the true waterway width, as depicted by the survey, and not the platted canal width. The actual width of the waterway is 135± feet at this location, MHWL to MHWL. Given that the proposed protrusion is 33 feet from the MHWL, the dock facility will occupy 24.44 percent of the waterway. Collier County records reveal that of the 14 platted single-family waterfront lots, each of which is allocated two boat slips as per the RPUD document, five have been issued BDEs and three (including the subject parcel) are in the process of obtaining BDEs. Approved BDE information: • 1672 Vinland Way — Lot 17 — HEX Decision 18-11 — Single slip, 44-foot protrusion • 1684 Vinland Way — Lot 20 — HEX Decision 18-17 — Single slip, 42-foot protrusion • 1688 Vinland Way — Lot 21 — HEX Decision 16-36 — Single slip, 44-foot protrusion • 1692 Vinland Way — Lot 22 — HEX Decision 17-11 — Single slip, 44-foot protrusion • 1696 Vinland Way — Lot 23 — HEX Decision 18-07 — Single slip, 43-foot protrusion SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Vinland Way (Right -of -Way), then Single-family dwelling within the Landings at Bear's Paw PUD East: Single-family dwelling within the Landings at Bear's Paw PUD South: Golden Gate Canal, then single family dwellings within a Residential Single- Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district West: Single-family dwelling within the Landings at Bear's Paw PUD Aerial — Collier County GIS BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 4 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 60 ()ooa sd!II!ud - AeM PUeluln 099� 308 StIMOOLZOZld : ZL60Z) ZZ0Z50L0 :podeN He;S :1uewt43e;;y EXHIBIT "C{{ {1 OF 3) i tr jl4 1' 1 1 U � n J b V _ �rt 1 i 3 i �SFC I 11 tx `�P e I I I I I I M f.1{H t iaKii �fv�i9 rtyy(( �£ �❑ a w } W # i oa 04 2 �a L{ I 4 i G Nil py k S� ffJJ � �� r a �A l 5 g 'ra k �; quo o � S iTKV r 2 a> nt H r BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way January 5, 2022 Page 5 of 9 3.B.a ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property is located adjacent to the Gordon River. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing riprap shoreline. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility. Exhibit sheet 6 of 6 provides an aerial with a note stating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The subject property is located within the residential development area of a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for which the RPUD document specifically allows each platted single-family lot located along the Golden Gate Canal two boat slips. The petitioner desires to add a single boatlift to accommodate up to a 30-foot vessel. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. The attached survey and plans demonstrate that there is insufficient water depth at the 20-foot protrusion line as measured from the property line, the most restrictive point of measure. BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 6 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 62 3.B.a 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility will only protrude 33 feet from the MHWL into the subject waterway that is approximately 135 feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The residences on the opposite shore have their docks on a different canal/waterway. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The approximate waterway width is 135 feet, MHWL to MHWL. The requested total dock protrusion is 33-feet from the MHWL which is 24.44 percent of the width of the waterway; therefore, more than 50 percent of the waterway is open for navigation. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The new dock facility incorporates a shore parallel design and will exceed the 7.5-foot side setback requirements from both property/riparian lines. The dock facility and location have been designed to satisfy required setbacks, provide safe access to/from a vessel, and not to interfere with any future neighboring dock facilities that may be constructed. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The design of the proposed dock facility is greatly influenced by a property line that was pushed back during the design phase of the development to allow for the canals shoreline to be stabilized using rip -rap. At this location the property line is 10.16 feet landward of the MHWL. Due to this condition the existing dock protrudes further out into the waterway in order to decrease the access walkway's slope and to reach out to adequate water depths to safely moor the vessel and allow the boatlift to function properly as well as the dock as it is an existing floating dock. BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 7 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 63 3.B.a 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The proposed dock facility has been minimized in order to meet the County dock building guidelines, the approved PUD, and be constructed within the 25% width of waterway. The proposed protrusion is consistent with the other dock designs that have been approved within this same development along subject shoreline. The design also provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock." Staff concurs. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The subject property has 69.5 feet of water/canal frontage and the proposed dock facility has been designed to moor a single 30-foot vessel which equates to 43.17 percent of said waterfrontage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The existing dock facility was constructed with a 16-foot side/riparian setback on each side of the dock, the RPUD document allows for 7.5-foot side/riparian setbacks for docks using a shore parallel design. The proposed boat lift will not decrease the existing setbacks and only requires additional protrusion into the waterway. All waterfront homes desiring a dock facility along this shoreline will have similar challenges and no one homeowner should be impacted more than another. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200-feet of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. Criterion not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the sea walled basin of Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands. BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 8 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 64 Staff analysis finds this request complies with five of the five of the primary criteria. With respect to the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable, the request meets five of the remaining five secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BDE-PL20210001645, to allow for the construction of the proposed dock facility as depicted within the plans contained in Attachment A, with the following condition: 1. Must obtain a Certificate of Completion for Building Permit No. PRBD20180212105 prior to adding proposed boatlift; OR 2. Must re -permit the entire dock facility, with the addition of the new proposed boatlift, and obtain a Certificate of Completion. Attachments: A) Proposed Site and Dock Plans B) Public Hearing Sign Posting C) E-mail from Collier County Development Review D) Applicant's Backup E) HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver BDE-PL20210001645 — 1660 Vinland Way Page 9 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 65 pUeluln 099� Sae Sti9WOO MZld : ZL60Z) sueld 31000 pue a;lg pasodoad - d }uauayOBIIV :;u8uay0e};d 00 ai 0 0 IJ LrL Lr� 0 W LQ r U) N a �C W } 0 6 } J Z O 00( U N co 00 00 U)III 0 N� Z �O aH Z O U I r LLI Z W H U) Z Z Z H0 0 < Z i-j d �O W0 U�� Of N Qo QZ 0H LL W 3 z Z vz z cn J < O Q J zzW oW J A-,w WQ OA(0C �w0 w z h H Q U �C O z0 } Q w rn a a U) Z 3 0 IN CO z 0 U ul U) pA20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 12/6/2021 pUeluln OM 3(38 SM0006ZOZId : Z160Z) sueld M30(3 pue a;ls pesodWd - V lU8WLl3BjjV :juewtj3Bjjt � I I z pq- �.✓��^� N ,� Q d W Z Y �. U o LL 0 Ur UI z_ w ~Q LL 0 0 0 w LL � Z \ \ I 0, UYo\ 01 Z_ Z Q \ W �z < \ � m Z XLL� w 0 Q \ a0 Z w Q \ } 0 \\ z A�� U) azcn F o i w .� `A�z •AIL t W Z J W Elf ^W LL 0 I..L 1 I-, 0- z W ° a W I w z W �� fn Q?N m a Z09 a O0, xa U jO tea¢ Z g 5wa Wzo� wi-o +� aOw ijl- UO w"- Q LL O 002 W �4O x�} Q Ztq}DO~� vtOFwr W ax II II a�Q o 300=o°}-o>3�?zo QQ �w K O w U� z � wwx�wo�?¢¢w �LLa?xwn 11�D aL°�3"y =3 =q; co a a� tU fC a pr 0 Q Z 0 Z 0-z 0 Z Z" x W 0 r� r � O � O m a w o � Q M � N N m M p c� A w p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 12/6/2021 3 pUeluln OM 3(38 SM0006ZOZId : Z160Z) sueld M30(3 pue a;ls posodoad - V IUOWLI3BjjV :juauayoeljd N T� 0 LU (n L.L �0 OJ O00 C� I>I 0 i9 � O Q CO c> G z wl\ � /1 if\ 'ro. IL C� z U) X w \\\ �A %010 oP Dr3 \ \ \ I ZO M. n n� wrn •. w �?� a O N S t LL Z WO w a ~a xa a z >O tea¢ ?x J y w N W a Q K= V N¢. W Z O, W z f +. L) 7 S .,w ] 3 0 H 000 a�x A�� W�zu: 002 Ww,.O �y 4O aiw¢ Qyw0 W g z�w�o3wQ SSW ��0>,>3�zzowo Ow >-, 4 0 0 a 3� 0 O a ,O�0— z J of CL Lu0 axQ9 &Oz F F K< 0 Q W� F d H F Z. . . . . . . . p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg BOATLIFT PLAN 12/6/2021 pUeluln OM 3(38 SM0006ZOZId : Z160Z) sueld M30(3 pue a;ls pesodWd - V lU8WLl3BjlV :juauayoeljd 00 00 o f //\ <I � > \ \ C) z �, I � Q \ \ I I / w z J H w 0- 0 O Of U- z O U) Z) O d >J O Of LL M M Y U O 0 0 w X LL O z x w } Q 3 0z Z° U W J `� ZU) U r0 W rn m a m Y V IL p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION oM0• pUeluln 099L 308 ML000LZOZld ZL60Z) sueld 3oop pue a;ls pasodoad - d }uauayOBIIV :;uawtpe}; 7 - xz Ay` T XL LLZ N 00 �'� . ❑ 0 r- Cb IL W Y V IL a uioQ c v OZ H Q p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 violand way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 12/6/2021 m Il pUeluln 099L 308 ML000LZOZld ZL60Z) sueld 31300 pue a;lg pesodWd - d }uauayoe;;v :;uewt43e};d o o - �r . w w Lu 2 ti �zF- w cn � LL \ o z w000 �� U)(DLLa Tom` Q o ��ow Q�U z0 �Lu=o z °o 0 Lo t. wpm AQLL Az 'o w Lu �o0- �(.0Q z a aD tU m a z 0 �mw..z F z r o w V i W U) Lu OU) w Z�- Q Jw Zo LLI >w om. oU) O M � U Cz - OCOO w � � z X 0.. W M O t. p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 12/6/2021 3.B.c KellyJohn From: KellyJohn Sent: Friday, January 07, 2022 4:21 PM To: KellyJohn Subject: BDE-PL20210001645 - 1660 Vinland Way - Public Hearing Sign HEX 1-27-2022 Attachments: E7FE7D5E-924A-4A30-8C15-4828E93783FEjpeg; OFF B87F4-2429-4624-AB67-C108D456D509 jpeg A Notice of Public Hearing Sign was posted by me to the front of the referenced address, at approximately 11:00 AM this date, as evidenced by the attached photographs. Respectfully, John Yeffy Senior Planner Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.5719 Fax: 239.252.6363 Email: John.Ke11Y@co11iercountvf1.aov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.IV/CollierZonin Cioter C01414tY Growth Management Department Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 72 3.B.c 1660 Vinland Wa BOAT DOCK EXTENSION T- Allni , n d3.foot Protrusion 3.B.d NawrockiStefanie From: McLeanMatthew Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3:00 PM To: info@orickmarine.com Cc: ScottChris; NawrockiStefanie Subject: FW: Landings at Bear's Paw Holly, Per our phone call and your question yesterday, please see below on the offset requirement and from where is should be measured. Thanks. Come! r Couvay Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager Collier County Growth Management Department Development Review Division - Manager 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-8279 Fax: 239-252-6945 From: McLeanMatthew Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:13 AM To: dan@jrevansengineering.com; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Will J. Dempsey <wjdempsey@napleslaw.com>; StrainMark <MarkStrain@colliergov.net> Cc: 'Greg Wardeberg' <gwardeberg@gmail.com>; ScottChris <ChrisScott@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw Dan, The LDC definition of Mean high-water line (MHW) identifies the intersection of the tidal plane of mean high water with shore as established by per the FL Coastal Mapping Act of 1974 Laws of Florida. Within the state law "mean high water" is the average height of the high waters over a 19 year period; therefore, the County recognizes the original MHW condition as one of the parameters for measuring the boat dock setback. For this particular project, this is the most restrictive measurement. As long as the docks do not protrude 20 feet past that original controlling MHW line, then no BDE is required. The approved PPL plans show this dimension as 20 feet from the controlling MHW line and will suffice for the site review/approval. Please provide a copy of this email along with the building permit application resubmittal. Thanks. Co9er county Packet Pg. 74 3.B.d Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager Collier County Growth Management Department Development Review Division - Manager 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-8279 Fax: 239-252-6945 From: dan@jrevansengineerinci.com Finailto:dan(7a irevansengineerinct.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:49 AM To: BosiMichael; Will J. Dempsey; StrainMark Cc: McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg' Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw First, I would like to thank everyone for reviewing this matter on behalf of the developer. It is sincerely appreciated If you need any further information from me in order to finalize your review/decision re: the BDE, or if you would like to meet with me today or at any time, please advise. Otherwise, if a decision has (or will be) made on the BDE, please advise on how to appropriately document that a BDE is not required, and that the approved PPL and ICP permits (PL20120002819 and PL20150000357, respectively) suffice for review/approval of the building permit for the docks. Sincere thanks, Daniel C. Hartley, P.E. J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 Estero, FL 33928 www.orevansengineering.com c (239) 250-9408 From: BosiMichael [mailto:MichaelBosi@colliergov.nc! Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 8:22 AM To: Will J. Dempsey; StrainMark Cc: McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg'; dan(dWevansengineering.com Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw Great job, Mark and Matt and thanks for all, working together to get the best decision within the code. bosi From: Will J. Dempsey [mailto:wjdempsey(&napleslaw.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:43 AM To: StrainMark Cc: BosiMichael; McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg'; 'dan@jrevansengineering.com' Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw Thanks Mark and Matt. Matt, I got your voicemail yesterday. I was (and am still) scrambling to stay on top of a number of client commitments and either Dan or I will get back to you today. Packet Pg. 75 3.B.d Thanks again gents, CHEFFYPASSIDOMO ATTORNEYS AT LAW Will J. Dempsey Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Lawyer Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile wjdempsey .naplesiaw.com www.napleslaw.com This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you), please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us (collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. From: StrainMark[trlaiito:MarkStrain@colliergov.netj Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:40 AM To: Will J. Dempsey Cc: BosiMichael; McLeanMatthew;'Greg Wardeberg';'dan@jrevansengineering.com' Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw I believe this has been resolved and no BDE is needed, Matt Mclean has the details. But.....1 am always available to meet. Matrk, 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address re Leased in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Will J. Dempsey[rnailto:wjdempsey(c7pnapleslaw.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 2:30 PM To: StrainMark Cc: BosiMichael; McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg'; 'dan@jrevansengineering.com' Subject: Landings at Bear's Paw Good afternoon Mark: 3 Packet Pg. 76 3.B.d Would you have time this week to huddle up on a Boat Dock Extension request for the Landings at Bear's Paw? This is the triangular residential project on the Golden Gate Canal and between Bear's Paw and the Gordon River Greenway. I'm available pretty much any time starting Wednesday through end of week. Thanks Mark, CHEFFY PASSIDOMO A770RNf.YS A7 LAa' Will J. Dempsey Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Lawyer Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile widem pseya.napleslaw.com www.nai)leslaw.com L n sm This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you), please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us (collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 77 �L ZoZ/G,~O f (,q 3.B.e HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A. Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE 2 DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN 'BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT." p° Planner responsible for providing the County Attorne -drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup •2- materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT — STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY a WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM >, AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] R c B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY o DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE m BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY -MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE Lo coo APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES -THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE, o 0 ✓Application, to include but not limited to the following: N N ✓ Narrative of request 0. ✓ Property Information N 'Property Ownership Disclosure Form N ✓ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat aD dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation from U f4 a. aside disclosure form) CL U Affidavit of Unified Control fI m k z_09.7,iCXLJ ✓Affidavit of ftQpfeseRtation X w x ✓Drawings (may include Cross -Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with o Water depth, location maps etc.) E NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) r ✓ Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Environmental Data Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver a Utility Letter Deviation Justifications 6P,tr,w,t-,j r q Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information lob Aides or Help Guides Packet Pg. 78 3.B.e ✓Boundary Survey ✓ Other documents, as needed, on a case -by -case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. ✓Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. ✓ flash drive with only one pdf file for all document � rt;, #A � 'r understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent's/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same or r for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 7 12/09/2021 ignature f Agent Representative Date Jeff Rogers Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative 0 0 a t a 0 c 0 c 0 m co r W m LO to r O O O r N O N J d N IS O O N Revised5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G.\CDES Planning Servioes\Current\Zoning Staff Inforrration\Job Aides or He#p Guides Packet Pg. 79 4. 3.B.e Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code o THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): rQ] DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE Q- PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): J Scott and Bonnie Phillips Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 1660 Vinland Way City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34105 Telephone: Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent(s): Jeff Rogers Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Address: 3584 Exchange Ave City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34104 Telephone:239-643-0166 Cel1:239-784-0081 Fax.239-643-6632 E-Mail Address: Jeff@thanaples.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range:35 /49 /25 Subdivision: Landings at Bear's Paw Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 1660 Vinland Way, Naples, FL 34105 Property I.D. Number: 54490010423 Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RPUD, UR May 8, 2018 Unit: Lot: 14 Block: Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 80 Cofer County 3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. I ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE I Zoning Land Use N RPUD Landing's at Bear's Paw I S RSF-4 & A Residential Single-family & Golden Gate Canal E RPUD Landing's at Bear's Paw W RSF-4 & P Residential Single-family & Gordon River Greenway DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ( Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): See attached SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 135 ft. Measurement from ® plat [ ] survey ® visual estimate other (specify) Aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 67 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. Required: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 33 ft. S. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 30 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: Majority of the waterfront homes along the subject shoreline have docks which most of them have been approved through the BIDE process. As proposed the dock is consistent with the previous approved docks. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.24 Acres May 8, 2018 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 81 GOIT County 3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes IN] No If yes, please provide copies. PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) May 8, 2018 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 82 r 3.B.e Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 1 must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) May 8, 2018 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 83 Co)e.r County 3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code i ne iwiowing Suomiiiai Kequirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Signed and Sealed Survey 1 Chart of Site Waterway 1 Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Electronic copy of all required documents *Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 1 ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. May 8, 2018 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 84 Co er County 3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ®Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Other: ® Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Si na re of Pe itioner or Agent J Y,'�'5;zl Date May 8, 2018 Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 85 3.B.e Narrative Description: The proposed Boat Dock Extension request is for a single-family dock located within the Landings at Bears Paw development along the Gordon River. This section of the Gordon River bottom lands is owned by the development/HOA as well as the rip -rap shoreline which is why we had the HOA provide us with a letter of support. The proposed dock has been designed to be consistent with the other previously approved docks that also required a BDE along the same subject development shoreline. As proposed the dock will protrude approximately 43-feet from the top of rip -rap and approximately 33-feet from the mean high water line therefore we are requesting a 13-foot extension from the allowed 20-feet. The subject waterway is approximately 135-feet wide and as proposed the dock will protrude approximately 25% into the subject waterway. The required side yard setbacks as outlined within the RPUD documents are 7.5-feet and as proposed the dock will provide the required setbacks. Additionally, the RPUD also allows the Landings at Bear's Paw development have up to 38 boat slips along their shoreline. The community dock accommodates 9 slips, and the remaining slips (29) are for the residences along the river which are allowed 2 slips per lot. The proposed dock is one of the allowed 29 slips along the river. Packet Pg. 86 r Co ��. �er County 3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieritow.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the ercenLdge Vi wui nILCICaL. Name and Address % of Ownership J Scott Phillips, 1660 Vinland Way, Naples, FL 50 Bonnie Phillips, 1660 Vinland Way, Naples, FL 50 b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the iercentage or siocx ownea oy eacn: Name and Address % of Ownership C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2D37 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 87 3.B.e Co a"Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28W NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the ;eneral and/or umitea partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 a� t� ca Y t) �4 a CL Y C1 M m X W 2 C E t V cc Q w C C1 E t 0 M w r.+ Q Packet Pg. 88 3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Co fler County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 07/23/21 Agen Owner Signature Date Jeffrey Scott Phillips Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 89 3.B.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 1, JSwttPhHips (print name), as ow^.r (title, if applicable) of (company, If a Iicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner�applicant�contract purchaser"and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application, and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/ authorizeT11 HO&ASsoc W.Inc,Jeff Rogea to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (LLC.) or Limited Company (LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's `Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature to STATE OF FLORIDA COUNT7.), F COLLIER The forinstrPen t �&Kn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on (date) by (name of person ath affirmation), as who is personally known to me or wh has pro¢ted (type of identification) as identification. STAMPISEAL Signature R Notary Pudic Stay d FiJa�quasine LoMnMnMy Cammiss GG 907390 ErAitea 02/27/2m CINIS-COO. 10I I5A 55 REN' 3/24/la Packet Pg. 90 3.B.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PC-;�)%tCO Q /6 4/S I, Bennie Phillips (print name), as -- (title, if applicable) of (company, If a licable), swear or affirm 0� under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerapplicantcontract purchaserand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorizeT-11 HeuaIJOR.9— to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member-" • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. _ s -- — 3 a n ture to STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER T�roinginst f was s m to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on o-2 (date) by (name of person pro affirmation), as who is personally known to me or wh as produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMPISEAL Signature florlde O(i 9b13G0 EXOM py27/p24 (' P\O8-('OA-Ofl 1 15\ 155 REV 3/24/14 Packet Pg. 91 3.B.e August 6, 2021 Collier County Government RE: The Landings at Bear's Paw —1660 Vinland Way Installation of Boat Lift Request To Whom It May Concern: This letter is intended to notify Collier County that the Landings at Bear's Paw Homeowner's Association, Inc. Board of Directors has reviewed and approved the proposed dock project, located at the property referenced above. The subject property is allowed a dock with up to two boat slips as outlined within the approved RPUD As proposed the dock and boatlift meet all the community design criteria and therefore, we trust that our approval will allow the County to proceed with their review of the proposed Boat Dock Extension application. Should you have any questions, please contact me at: 239.436.1500. Sincerely, t George A. Wilson President Landings at Bear's Paw Homeowner's Association, Inc. Packet Pg. 92 3.B.e Jeff Rogers From: StrainMark <MarkStrain@colliergov.net> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:17 PM To: Jeff Rogers This is what found in an email sent by Matt to the applicant: The LDC definition of Mean high-water line (MHW) identifies the intersection of the tidal plane of mean high water with shore as established by per the FL Coastal Mapping Act of 1974 Laws of Florida. Within the state law "mean high water" is the average height of the high waters over a 19 year period; therefore, the County recognizes the original MHW condition as one of the parameters for measuring the boat dock setback. For this particular project, this is the most restrictive measurement. As long as the docks do not protrude 20 feet past that original controlling MHW line, then no BIDE is required. The approved PPL plans show this dimension as 20 feet from the controlling MHW line and will suffice for the site review/approval. Please provide a copy of this email along with the building permit application resubmittal. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 93 - ALM PUPIUI A OM 3a8 SM0004ZOZ-1d : ZL60Z) a6e>laed dnMoe8 X3H - a ivawLioew :;uauayaeuv 0 LPL 0 IJ LrL Lr� 0 W L� r U) N a �C W } ,0 6 F U } J z �CO III U) N CO 00 00 Cn d Z O c 0- aH z O U I r LLI Z W H U) Z Z Z H0 0 < Z i-j d �O WO U�� Of Q Z 0 LLJ Q p H W 3 z Z vz z cn J < O Q J zzW oW J A-,w WQ OA(0C �w0 w z h H Q U �C 0 zO m a N Z 0 F O M o moNz 0 3a°zw U m gawmw W w rt p x N Oa Z�- 0 JQ Z o- J 3 /0 W iiQ N N M � O � � z H W M W pA20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 8/24/2021 ALM PUBMA OM 3a8 SM0004ZOZ-1d : ZL60Z) a6aMaad dnMae8 X3H - a ivauayaeim :;uauayae v IQ! m M �I II I[I 1 v � o O � W z_ J Q' W a W a ZQ LL tZwi J o d CA (0m Q Z It19 t ■ ■Lu ■ • ■ ■ .. .. � Y �z C/)m� X LL WD < 0 H Q a C� z H U) X _ W z J w ^W LL 0 I..L p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 8/24/2021 g; rn a a� tU fC a d m IL C� z U) X LU - AeM Pulu!A 0996 308 5 ,9WOUZOZ-1d : ZL60Z) aBeVed dnM3eq X3H - a w9wLioeim :;uewLj3ejjv II -�� II m }LO Q o W m Z J Q LL A Z W W > J o d m Q Z ✓L•IKO&I -A 0 w (n LL C a_ CO zz O W w J � W Z M O w W �?� a O NSa' LL z O w o N x w x a ~O xa z >0 tea¢ i a ?x J N w= y W V N ¢ M ,w4 Q p W Z. O 2 U f +, 7 S aOw WW", x 0 0 0 � H rA�� w, w�zu: ONE w�� Q:y¢O wwQ Qyw z Q O H W W z� p n n� W O Zofwx03: Q .>,> 'HOD'O'o3�zMa w ¢00a3 vwiOa 0— WOQw�UzF Z J > O ] H W F F-�¢m aw3F �00 aR- Z rm rn 6 a a� tU m a m 7 a Z 0 0 Z uo 0 D U z w w W N U) p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg BOATLIFT PLAN 8/24/2021 - ALM PUBMA OM 3a8 SM0004ZOZ-1d : ZL60Z) a6eMOed dnMoe8 X3H - a zu,3w4oeuv :;uauay3L'jjv m m w z_ J H w 0- 0 Of U O z o O p U) w Z) X LL O O z a U) w CO 0 0l > Z 2 /\/\ =I -j I I / } Q 3 0z Z° U W J U) ZU) 0 U r0 p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION I4! In ri - AeM pueluln 099� 3(38 9-MOOMOZ-1d ZL60Z) 86eVed dmpe8 X3H - (3;u8uay3eUV :;uauay:)ellV 00 IL 44 _ a T 1, a O 3 s [n 2 zmw 1 LLLU J OLOL ❑❑U }2 C♦I F- Z LLI cv J�- 36 Z U LLI No Z �6 p ' 6 ��pP�( ,y — p - a \ w CO �3 (/0� is J rI w % W o Cr co Q g► Hti N". O o w Q o = w wQ - 02 a3 =O dV X A 0 w zY n a Q ► a" ui uioQ c v Oz -Q p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 violand way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 8/24/2021 - AeM puelu!n 099� 3(38 9-MOOOLZOZ-1d : ZL60Z) 86ePed dmpe8 X3H - (3;u8LuLl3e;;d :;uauay:)ellV in ch �L r a r i i d W w u>iZT- a A- U > LL W O O O o Y Q O d U' , ui o � Q w z p z U U) U= 0 o :+.. . ` z z0 0 z 0 0 Q Ln � \ \ � ❑mw F \ r o w V W \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 1 w \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 0 Ill \ \ w \ \ \ w \ \ \\ wCA \ \\ \ \ \ �i m \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ Z J \ A J LL Z Cl)Lu \ \ \ [~h 19 Q \ \ \ \ \ \ ~~ o W \ \ \ \ z w Z \ \ H 7GW i ry w _ _^ a, d / O a5 o ry w o f � H A i� I J ~1 U p:\20107 dock masters\20107.15 dock masters-1660 violand way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.15-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 8/24/2021 3.B.e PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion Met Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 67-ft. The zoning and upland land use is a single-family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC-LDC as well as the approved PUD. The current proposed dock design has 1 optional boat slip. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Criterion Met Response: See attached survey/drawing illustrating the existing shoreline and associated base of riprap. At the 20-foot protrusion line taken from the Top of Bank there is just not sufficient water to accommodate the vessel nor boatlift which is still partially over the riprap. Therefore, there is insufficient water depths to moor a vessel or provide safe access to the docking facility within the 20- foot protrusion mark. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion Met Response: The proposed docking facility will not have any adverse impacts on navigation as it will only protrude 33-feet from the MHWL into the waterway that is approximately 135-feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate space for Packet Pg. 100 3.B.e navigation through this waterway as well as provides sufficient space for a dock to be built across the waterway from the subject property and still have adequate space for navigation. Additionally, the proposed dock protrusion is consistent with the other previously approved docks along the subject shoreline. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion Met Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 33-feet from the MHWL into a waterway that is 135' wide from MHWL to MHWL. The proposed dock protrudes approximately 25% into the waterway and therefore as proposed the dock does meet this criterion. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion Met Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 7.5-foot setbacks from both property/riparian lines. The approved PUD for the Landings at Bears Paw development only requires 7.5-feet setbacks for a docking facility that is parallel to the shoreline. The dock design and location has been designed to be located within the required setbacks, provide safe access with a vessel, and not interfere with any future neighboring docking facilities that maybe constructed. Packet Pg. 101 3.B.e SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Response: The proposed dock facility was primarily governed by the County guidelines and the approved PUD for the Landings at Bear's Paw. The one special condition that has affected the overall proposed dock design was the relatively high Top of Bank elevation and the associated large rip -rap shoreline. Due to this condition the existing dock protrudes further out into the waterway in order to decrease the access walkway's slope and to reach out to adequate water depths to safely moor the vessel and allow the boatlift to function properly as well as the dock as it is an existing floating dock. Criterion Met 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been minimized in order to meet the County dock building guidelines, the approved PUD, and be constructed within the 25% width of waterway. The proposed protrusion is consistent with the other dock designs that have been approved within this same development along the subject shoreline. The design also provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock. Criterion Met 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 30-feet which is less than 50% the subject property's linear waterfront footage. Therefore, this criterion is met. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) Response: The proposed dock facility will be one of potentially 14 other single-family docking facilities allowed to be constructed along this shoreline not including the HOA docking facility. The proposed dock has been designed within the designated setback area as outlined in the approved PUD document for this development. The proposed docking facility design is consistent with others on this waterway and will not affect neighboring properties view of the waterway. Criterion Met Packet Pg. 102 3.B.e 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. Criterion Met 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.I I must be demonstrated.) Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. Packet Pg. 103 3.B.e ORDINANCE NO. 13- 6 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-3 AND W-4 (ST/W-3 AND ST/W-4) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-3 AND W-4 (ST/W-3 AND ST/W-4) FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW RPUD TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND UP TO 38 BOAT SLIPS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE GOLDEN GATE CANAL SOUTH OF BEAR'S PAW IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 10.75 ± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PETITION RZ-PL20120002095) WHEREAS, John Passidomo, Esquire and William Dempsey, Esquire of Cheffy Passidomo, P.A., representing Headwaters Development Limited Liability Limited Partnership LLLP, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property; and WHEREAS, the Special Treatment zones ST/W-3 and ST/W-4 are not changed by this rezone. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from an Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 25 residential dwelling units and up to 38 boat slips in accordance with Exhibits "A" through "G", Landings at Bear's Paw\RZ-PL20120002095 1 of 2 Rev. 10/28/ 13 Packet Pg. 104 3.B.e EXHIBIT E LIST OF LDC DEVIATIONS NOTE: Nothing in this PUD Document shall approve a deviation to the LDC unless it is listed in this Exhibit E. 1. Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, "Street System Requirements," which states that dead-end streets are prohibited except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow the internal dead-end street to terminate in a "T" junction vehicular turnaround, as generally depicted on the Conceptual Master Plan. Final location and dimensions of the "T" junction shall be determined at the time of site development plan approval, and shall meet local fire district standards. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements," and Appendix B, "Typical Street Sections," which establish a 60-foot width for local roads, to allow a 50-foot wide road in accordance with the internal right of way cross section attached under Exhibit C. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02A.2., "Sidewalks and Bike Lane Pathway Requirements," which requires sidewalks on both sides of a right-of-way or easement internal to a site, to allow for a sidewalk to be constructed along one side of the right-of-way, including the western terminus of the "T" junction described in Deviation # 1, above. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.06.E.5., "Dock Facilities," which requires dock facilities to have a side setback of 15 feet for dock facilities on lots with greater than 60 feet of water frontage, to allow a 7.5-foot side setbacks for the private single-family community dock facilities located along that section of Golden Gate Canal within the Residential Tract; provided that such slips are parallel to (rather than perpendicular to) the shoreline. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G. L, "Open Space Requirements," which requires that PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and accessory uses to devote at least 60 percent of the gross area to usable open space, to allow at least 50 percent of the gross area to be devoted to usable open space; provided, however, that landscaping internal to the project shall be provided in substantial conformity with the conceptual enhanced landscape plan attached hereto as Exhibit H. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.b., "Fences and Walls," which permits walls at a maximum height of 6 feet in the rear and side yards of designated residential components of PUDs, to allow walls at a maximum height of 8 feet in the non - waterfront rear and side yards of the residential lots. 7. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B. Lb., "Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts," which requires signs within residential PUDs to be The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 6 of 12 PUDZ-PL20120002095 October 24, 2013 Packet Pg. 105 3.B.e located no closer than 10 feet from the property line or from the edge of the roadway, paved surface, or back of curb, as applicable, to allow project entry signage to be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line. 8. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.1. "Alternate A: Landscape Buffer," which requires a ten -foot -wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center, to allow a modified Alternate A Landscape Buffer with trees spaced an average of 45 feet on center for that portion of the project adjacent to the Golden Gate Canal. The equivalent number of trees otherwise required by the 30-foot spacing shall be provided within the Alternative A. Landscape Buffer located on the Residential Tract along the Golden Gate Canal. The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 7 of 12 PUDZ-PL20120002095 October 24, 2013 Packet Pg. 106 (moo(i sdlll!4d - AeM Puelu!A 0991 348 917960006ZOZ-1d ZL60Z) OBe)13ed dnMoe8 X3H - 0 lu8w40BP / :luawy0L'UV m 00 C O " LC) �r O J 0 rn a v Y a . cn •� 1`L o 25 p. o \ \ \ \ \ 0tz LLJ ya• UW�—CYQ ZZ �Qp NN W V) m �Joo CA 5 �J p� ,o ion J '�• �� o o, 'n � � co 0O co O � o v- * O `c�S' )— ww ww 33 o (o m> \ Z`O � oa o- 00 00 O N 000 LoU-) lot LOa V). C9 v)• d Coo w Coco (O CO Zz zz (nN o II II II :� cJ o J NN d p�a �So ilzl iv 3e8 ON �€ $'x$ 'y o Is tj ri o co. 8 ' ��a o. a g'a< Ec (i o— ms a $ �B� iJim 3= � �� $�o �3z— m �_ om'e¢' €� 3 a �8 ffi 3xms ' ja 2� 9 >S$��W >'ao }1_}g S o <m� m73oe cldi I8 .�FB = S all vav_ Q m $S wcS c.J�OCR x� O m 'L' o aY zi000adanuua ea naSo KWM g v Mongols tSom �'�'. ,o ��mw a.Nmv qq e 2.fig=o 'v QQ=^-y4(g o CO o `0- i ` oN.- S m�i7; 3=11�€ ooC n $ zoo' m mm z9w mya �ll 3jl`93� l' 9 $ i IN s'm 3 N n Z c b �zmU3 Q G 4 so• m o (/7 Z _ v� l o >N �. m.� a`=�Yb ; ��=mm€mi�'z'"�"b'b its�� 9j ti a �� c� V$ o00 � 3m 9[.$g�gg9N�"3�CNa�90� .9CL 0m CJ mn coo°�ziG ��'>Sm$CIS�bd�Bg1�u�ac a�mi a��m�"pimdn Z m om 3 Ws Woea obc>ca ��oo� ogom �o `o . � o a 4 �L4 (Mooa sdipiyd - AeM pueIuin 099L 3a8 949L000LZOZId ZL60Z) a6e310ed dnijae8 X3H - a 3uawy3e44y :;uswgaegy � O Off• \ >�c, - �� \a ` 6 r ado Ln d' �r O �o \ �� Wm 0 Q. ,\60 0 E LLJ U LLJ 60 Z Z LLJ U to Q o °�°Q0 NN wm O 0 P . 9 55 � 150g 8a M • N i IL (D,t o LgLq Nn u),LO Vo � � i) O) un o in i- o:t o� o0 00 ON 000 pp M-t MIt ,t,t 4Zt 44 z z Z Z V) V1 o ww N J oa c mac" � gg cd o" ox FS is yww syk3>> y °w' j $ on Qzo .. 6� y �o A��ti gE7®� A3f000Ow ; n m" n�WW 33 �3� o O � �' Sw aax°E °o HI .rz. Id Z ho oa Jmem rn�wa C p oh '�� aY�Q e -- oQg'<6`w'' �� z9so�m z� �2 LLI g� n� rK �n y vi a•o o'- mph o6wWB�g3� m€ "a •xm� bhh �hhh ��e «�^ C0� i �<o£ 5 00 '� a o ioOo�o zo 9vipw$o�"-,N Y8 o`o� O Q O °o v�aB a .>i"- �.g=`m S ;° JW Wu Sci cfYW � o V (V I> @ i` yp z�io �iW oh��g = �� `_..,ctociJ.aace�y 8�i TO w � o m� F ix Yza6c cc cu ¢uu cucuaz v. iE 6 00o Wa V "' m 0- E o�N myz o $�o� m o� :^p � r`a o �vin 8 `p'o n om fop 8 2 iz="- jN c ow .. \°4 Nmo wk��JL-waz��g'J O Q O r" 5 o'\m c� b 3woioo �oo�"ow ��am _ No p Ja'O�n- N o O z�o'z"ao-":o �uorc'� 8 3� E.. LL�z $= g��s��W�=goo �r�� 3 Y�o O d o 2 V ,t E mY> o ov o op =&'��si m WB�pz' 'p�zsdoo�o��Yi a ��CO E. ^U9 3owpo> v'i��'N"�z�Qm Y �zzgs wi` vo k'F�s"NsW �g ffi�� a`o_ �y� o €o� c� �z,e !z �'i, WNl Zm>Y ouooc�boara W6Kti�mW �a a JOK �xelpri<i�vit>�dnoei��a�� "p_,m <'A .i ci cS JWW 4iWVFi��J i Low 3.B.e 1660 VINLAND WAY NAPLEs, FL 34105 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 19, 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 Packet Pg. 109 3.B.e 1660 Vinland Way Submerged Resource Survey July 2021 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed dock and associated residence are located at 1664 Vinland Way and can be further identified by parcel #54490010423. The property is bound to the east and west by single family residences, to the north by Vinland Way, and to the south by the subject man-made canal section of the Gordon River. The property is located at Section 35, Township 49 South, and Range 25 East. The landward portion of the property currently contains a single-family residence which the subject dock will be an accessory structure. Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services pertaining to the mangrove removal and proposed docking facility, which requires the completion of a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This report will provide planning and assistance to both the owner(s) and government agencies reviewing the proposed project. The SRS survey was conducted on July 16, 2021. Sea surface conditions consisted of partly cloudy skies, light winds out of the southeast, and an air temperature of 88' F. The tide was at mid -level upon arrival to the site, allowing for observance of most of the bottom lands from the dock. High tide at the project site occurred at 6:06 A.M. (2.4 ft.) and low tide had occurred following our arrival onsite at 11:49 A.M. (1.1 ft.). The water temperature was 830 F. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the submerged resource survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200' of the proposed project. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel conducted a site visit to verify the location of any submerged resources within 200-feet. Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site (or the lack there of), estimated the percent coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Garmin Model 76csx). Packet Pg. 110 3.B.e 1660 Vinland Way Submerged Resource Survey July 2021 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the Submerged Resource Survey to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock and boat -lift installation. The components for this survey included: • Review of aerial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage • Document and photograph all findings The survey area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects, spaced approximately 10-feet apart as shown on the attached exhibit. The existing surrounding docks on the canal provided reference points for easily identifiable land markers such as dock pilings which assisted in maintaining position within each transect. 4.0 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of 1 distinct classification: silt muck with sand and minimal shell debris, which was observed throughout the entire surveyed area. The shoreline consists of rip -rap with numerous other existing single-family docks. The rip -rap and existing dock piles all support a variety of fish as well as sessile and motile invertebrates such as barnacles and mud crabs. Some of the existing dock piles carried historic fragments or remains of oysters, but no live individuals were observed. Algae was observed covering parts of the submerged portions of the piles and rip -rap but was not observed in the underlying substrate. The majority of the project site was devoid of vegetative growth, presumably because of the low water quality and higher levels of freshwater which also reduces penetration of the water column by sunlight. A list of observed species can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1 — Observed fish species Common Name Scientific Name Striped Mullet Mu it ce halus Shee shead 4rchosar us probatocephalus Gray Snapper Luyanus grisens Barnacle Am hibalanus spp. Mud Crab Pano ius herbstii Snook Centropomus undecimalis Packet Pg. 111 3.B.e 1660 Vinland Way Submerged Resource Survey July 2021 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey conducted at the project site yielded few findings at best. Barnacles, mud crabs, and numerous fish species could be seen along the shoreline as well as out on the adjacent dock pilings. Seagrasses were not observed anywhere near the project site. All fish species were observed swimming in and around the shoreline. Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed project. EXISTING DOCK & RIP -RAP SHORELINE I BASED ROCK OF RIP -RAP Typical Bottom Sediment al Typical Bottom sediment Packet Pg. 112 CO&Y county 3.B.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner For Petition Number(s): ? L Zoz 410061 (P `15 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), 11z11JJ05 (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared ergency ith hybrid virtual FAlichearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Signature: Applicant* ® Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 113 3.0 01/27/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.0 Item Summary: Petition No. BDE-PL20210001646 - Request for a 21-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 41 feet into a waterway that is 135 feet wide for the benefit of property is located at 1664 Vinland Way, further described as Lot 15, Landing at Bear's Paw, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commission District 4 Meeting Date: 01/27/2022 Prepared by: Title: Planner — Zoning Name: John Kelly 01/05/2022 5:23 PM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 01/05/2022 5:23 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending Review Item Completed Completed 01/13/2022 4:12 PM Completed 01/18/2022 11:13 AM Completed 01/19/2022 5:07 PM 01/27/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 114 3.C.a Co e-r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION - ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: JANUARY 27, 2022 SUBJECT: BDE-PL20210001646, 1664 VINLAND WAY GILMOUR DOCK PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: David W. Gilmour 16992 Verona Ln. Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: AGENT: Jeff Rogers Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 The petitioner requests a 21-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow the addition of a boatlift to an existing boat dock facility that will protrude a total of 41 feet into a waterway that is 135± feet wide, pursuant to Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for the benefit of the subject property. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 1664 Vinland Way, further described as Lot 15, Landings at Bear's Paw, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is located within a residential component of the Landings at Bear's Paw Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 13-66, as amended. Said property comprises 0.24 acres that has been developed with a single-family dwelling and has 67 feet of water frontage. The petitioner is proposing to add a boatlift to an existing dock facility to moor a single vessel of up to 30 feet in overall length. Said dock was constructed in accord with Building Permit No.: PRBD20201043415 for which a Certificate of Completion was issued on April 26, 2021. (Continued on Page 3) BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 1 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 115 Iq U C-i hooQinomH9-AeM Pum u m V99L]Q8 9 9L000LZ Z d:EL60Z Z oZ 0�0 podemI els quawtpelIv R = / 3 � ` � § \ d ~� � q 0 LU §m �R ? / ■ 2 � q � ? < : . kL k � � � _ C) � � C� cq J IL CD mo g z C = � $ � BDE PL20 10 016 6 -166 Vinland Way January %222 Page 2 0 9 3.C.a Purpose/Description of Project (Continued) Exhibit A of the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD document, Permitted Uses, section c. — Golden Gate Canal (as to the Northern 1/2 of the Golden Gate Canal abutting the project) states: i. Permitted Uses: private recreational single-family boat docks, mooring pilings, boat lifts/davits, and kayak launches to serve residents and their guests. All docks are reserved for the exclusive use of the owners of dwelling units within the RPUD property. No more than ten (10) boat slips may be constructed adjacent to the Amenity Area, no more than two (2) boat slips may be constructed adjacent to each platted single-family water front lot, and no more than thirty-eight (38) slips may be constructed within the project. Except for any deviations listed in this RPUD Document, all docks and boat slips shall be subject to the requirements ofLDC Section 5.03.06 and, to the extent applicable, the Manatee Protection Plan. Exhibit E of the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD Document, List of Deviations, contains the following applicable deviation: 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.06.E.5., "Dock Facilities, " which requires dock facilities to have a side setback of 15 feet for dock facilities on lots with greater than 60 feet of water frontage, to allow a 7.5 foot side setbacks for the private single-family community dock facilities located along that section of Golden Gate Canal within the Residential Tract; provided that such slips are parallel to (rather than perpendicular to) the shoreline. Staff further notes that at the time of site development for the RPUD the developer modified the shoreline to create a rip -rap shoreline extending from the rear property lines into the water body. This modified the MHWL and as a result the property line is a greater distance landward of the MHWL. As such, it was previously determined that for this development that if a dock does not protrude 20 feet past the original controlling MHWL no BDE should be required (See Attachment C). As per a Sketch of Boundary Survey dated 03/09/2021, with a completion date of 04/06/2021, the existing dock facility exceeds the required 7.5-foot side setback requirement established above. Said survey further demonstrates the existing dock facility protrudes 19.39 feet from the Mean High -Water Line (MHWL). The existing dock facility is therefore compliant as it protrudes 19.39 feet from the MHWL. As proposed, incorporating the desired boatlift using a shore parallel design results in a protrusion of 33.3 feet as measured from the MHWL. However, LDC Section 5.03.06.C.1, Measurement of dock protrusions and extensions, states: Measurement is made from the most restrictive of the following: property line, bulkhead line, shoreline, seawall, rip -rap line, control elevation contour, or mean high water line (MHWL). If measured from the property line, the most restrictive point as per the referenced requirement, the overall protrusion is 4 1 ± feet from the most restrictive point. BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 3 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 117 3.C.a LDC Section 5.03.06.C.4. states: The allowable protrusion of the facility into the waterway shall be based on the percentages described in subsection 5.03.06.E.2 of this LDC as applied to the true waterway width, as depicted by the survey, and not the platted canal width. The actual width of the waterway is 135± feet at this location, MHWL to MHWL. Given that the proposed protrusion is 33.3 feet from the MHWL, the dock facility will occupy 24.67 percent of the waterway. Collier County records reveal that of the 14 platted single-family waterfront lots, each of which is allocated two boat slips as per the RPUD document, five have been issued BDEs and three (including the subject parcel) are in the process of obtaining BDEs. Approved BDE information: • 1672 Vinland Way — Lot 17 — HEX Decision 18-11 — Single slip, 44-foot protrusion • 1684 Vinland Way — Lot 20 — HEX Decision 18-17 — Single slip, 42-foot protrusion • 1688 Vinland Way — Lot 21 — HEX Decision 16-36 — Single slip, 44-foot protrusion • 1692 Vinland Way — Lot 22 — HEX Decision 17-11 — Single slip, 44-foot protrusion • 1696 Vinland Way — Lot 23 — HEX Decision 18-07 — Single slip, 43-foot protrusion SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Vinland Way (Right -of -Way), then Single-family dwelling within the Landings at Bear's Paw PUD East: Single-family dwelling within the Landings at Bear's Paw PUD South: Golden Gate Canal, then single family dwellings within a Residential Single- Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district West: Single-family dwelling within the Landings at Bear's Paw PUD Aerial — Collier County GIS BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 4 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 118 3.C.a EXHIBIT"C" (I OF 3) �4'p�yC C iaKii �fv�i9 rtyy(( �£ �❑ a w } w # i �W�YY Nuci Ih j �¢ L{ I 3 .'Y n d '3?n K 9a i6 _Lnd lmn1 lw Ego t IV n - .J<� IL N N O N LO O O 0 Q m c d t V m a BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 5 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. E9 3.C.a ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property is located adjacent to the Gordon River. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing riprap shoreline. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility. Exhibit sheet 6 of 6 provides an aerial with a note stating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The subject property is located within the residential development area of a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for which the RPUD document specifically allows each platted single-family lot located along the Golden Gate Canal two boat slips. The petitioner desires to add a single boatlift to accommodate up to a 30-foot vessel. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. The attached survey and plans demonstrate that there is insufficient water depth at the 20-foot protrusion line as measured from the property line, the most restrictive point of measure. BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 6 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 120 3.C.a 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility will only protrude 33.3 feet from the MHWL into the subject waterway that is approximately 135 feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The residences on the opposite shore have their docks on a different canal/waterway. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The approximate waterway width is 135 feet, MHWL to MHWL. The requested total dock protrusion is 33.3-feet from the MHWL which is 24.67 percent of the width of the waterway; therefore, more than 50 percent of the waterway is open for navigation. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The new dock facility incorporates a shore parallel design and will exceed the 7.5-foot side setback requirements from both property/riparian lines. The dock facility and location have been designed to satisfy required setbacks, provide safe access to/from a vessel, and not to interfere with any future neighboring dock facilities that may be constructed. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The design of the proposed dock facility is greatly influenced by a property line that was pushed back during the design phase of the development to allow for the canals shoreline to be stabilized using rip -rap. At this location the property line is 10.16 feet landward of the MHWL. Due to this condition the existing dock protrudes further out into the waterway in order to decrease the access walkway's slope and to reach out to adequate water depths to safely moor the vessel and allow the boatlift to function properly as well as the dock as it is an existing floating dock. BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 7 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 121 3.C.a 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The proposed dock facility has been minimized in order to meet the County dock building guidelines, the approved PUD, and be constructed within the 25% width of waterway. The proposed protrusion is consistent with the other dock designs that have been approved within this same development along subject shoreline. The design also provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock." Staff concurs. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The subject property has 67 feet of water/canal frontage and the proposed dock facility has been designed to moor a single 30-foot vessel which equates to 44.78 percent of said waterfrontage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The existing dock facility was constructed with at least 16-foot side/riparian setback on each side of the dock, the RPUD document allows for 7.5-foot side/riparian setbacks for docks using a shore parallel design. The proposed boat lift will not decrease the existing setbacks and only requires additional protrusion into the waterway. All waterfront homes desiring a dock facility along this shoreline will have similar challenges and no one homeowner should be impacted more than another. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200-feet of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. Criterion not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the sea walled basin of Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands. BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 8 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 122 3.C.a Staff analysis finds this request complies with five of the five of the primary criteria. With respect to the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable, the request meets five of the remaining five secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BDE-PL20210001646, to allow for the construction of the proposed dock facility as depicted within the plans contained in Attachment A. Attachments: A) Proposed Site and Dock Plans B) Public Hearing Sign Posting C) E-mail from Collier County Development Review D) Building Permit No. PRBD20201043415 E) Applicant's Backup F) HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver BDE-PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way Page 9 of 9 January 5, 2022 Packet Pg. 123 pUeluln V993(38 9ti94 OOMZ'ld £160Z) sueld M30(3 pue a;ls posodoad - V Iuauayoelly :Iuewtioe14 "t � N le ' ` z.nx oelb � • - e - I I •`L �n'a Qi �� " • i"-J yt 1 1 Y e Y 1 _ � � �� ` • .�§ ^ ;" lr , P + •( � 1�b4 Tf 9 Y ;y ' J � w w a 1 � � ♦ �� ' 6 II. � /� ��,�. S t Y-W� �� I I I II N u n9 N ` • lau . "�` <ieL ! a W p U) a §hL 0 N �A�` �i•. ,,W Z Z w O UJ N • s •„en.�ae , xms• S-x o 6 w a C/)6 o LU �. LL w� Q Y �o N F U pA20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 1/3/2022 pUeluln VM 3(38 9ti9600WUld : £160Z) sueld M30(3 pue a;ls pesodWd - V lu8wt43Bjjv :ju8wtj3Bljd I� M z g w _z_ � J z_ H Y U U w 0 im / w z J H w a a� 0 a w0M 0 z AQU- A z c6 F w v a (0z r, w z J w 0- _- 0�/ Of I..L TW • p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 1/3/2022 /I 3 o 2 z o w I - a W W z W �� 0 Q?N m a o Z >w tea¢ g Ewa ¢�2 c� Wzo° woo o+� a o w Z U H QUO WJH= w O 00 2 w �¢O x�> aZ�>oo�3 vtO�wrw¢x n n ate¢ o Q3 o o§1°y KOW0 jzo ow�y�¢Zoo=3 o� W w ¢ x ylW�Na�0Q�� w < H�?¢m 3� 2 w 3 0 w o� jw pi 0 z z Q Q � a_ _Z �J O J0 Zz U) X w �} ''V^^ /W r cS � O � W w 2 k w Cn lyl Q M � N N F-' w m K M p c� E w I� M pueluln V99L 308 ML000LZOZld : £L606 sueld 31300 pue a;lg pasodoad - d WOWLIOB11V :;uauayae11 N z Lu d z N 1 I ti Q' J V Z _ Al 00 Y z MQ W L.L O L.L O w cD z z J Cn F X of LU ^w LL O GLL LL p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland I 3 I'M Q CO u CO L.L OX O Q `' 0� O C,� m � (3 O z z U , Lu LL 0 3 O z ° w ¢ W w W LL z O � U N N w �3� 1 w S O LL z O o N x w a a ~O ..XLL z >0 tea¢ i LLw ?X J � w Q W N 5 Q. W ¢ K= 0 w z o " R mo w aOw DU D ] 3 w H w0� LLw,2 Owm LL�a.. Ww,o �y 40 NW> ¢ �wLL a z Oza�Qz�w oQWQO Dof 33 wQ..>>>�� Qz OU O Z o> K n W > z LL f? owH>m¢zF�00a3�wH Lo O zJ>w] W F�?¢m aXe aw3� �aQ¢00 al-r z a <w _z_ Q' J IMES PLAN 1/3/2022 pueluln V99L 308 ML000LZOZld : £L60Z) sueld 31300 pue a;lg pasodoad - d }uauayoelly :;uauayae}}d CO 90 ,I CO Q CO v w \/\/ oLO M \ �CZ C, 0 Z Lo z w 0 Q I \\ \ W / / 0 0 LL 01. Z O () CO UQU I I \ \\ Q W w LL o 0 \oLU � U CL U w Q Z O M o \/ / Q U p Cr) X CO LL I w= C� 2 z I \\ \ pow / wo X /\/\ w ` Q W w I \ \ \ d 0 \J�OL °qMM Q LL O M � 8) 4 a \\\\ \ \ � \/\ a � / x� / R w /\/\ p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland ce pueluln V99L 308 ML000LZOZId £L60Z) sueld 31300 pue a;lg pasodo.ad - d }uauayOBIIV :;uauayae;;d CO -� a d A :t 0 4A AMID. LO z U z w ILL Z 1i O W i \ Z z f — A U w a q P- Z < _ C4 Z co -77 aJ" �' l Z W crcr �a 31' r j000l X Q M a' c� U Q - "...-- �� i Off' 2 0 —s � �' z.ILL s ,•fs - ` A —. Illy`^ O = Z _ Z Q p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vmland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 1/3/2022 M pueluln V99L 308 ML000LZOZld : £L606 sueld 31300 pue a;lg pesodWd - d WOWLIOB11v :;uauayae};d I.J.EffF N v A-- Z _ MMA v-. w wC7 w �z�w w 00 0 ` U C7 1L 0- 0 0 0 j w w'•. H w w z 0 w U w w 2 a w Om- z z0�a � :, • O f .-. \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ w \ \ H ry w 0- 0 LL a f - 1 i rth�, L L p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 1/3/2022 rn N IL IL z 0 �mw..z F z r o w V I w W 00�� U) Q� �Lu U Ow Z� Q0 Jw ZLu �w gym. U) O M � � � z � � o -� a ^� .. w M O 21 3.C.c KellvJohn From: KellyJohn Sent: Friday, January 07, 2022 4:17 PM To: KellyJohn Subject: BDE-PL20210001646 - 1664 Vinland Way - Public Hearing Sign HEX 1-27-2022 Attachments: 8EDDE74A-70F7-4866-8072-B204D7B1 EE74 jpeg; 5ACC1416-433D-4FE3-A8133423EA9BA149A jpeg A Notice of Public Hearing Sign was posted by me to the front of the referenced address, at approximately 11:00 AM this date, as evidenced by the attached photographs. Respectfully, Yohn Xeffy Senior Planner Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.5719 Fax: 239.252.6363 Email: John.Kelly@colliercountvfl.aov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZonin C;01MY C0'14YIt Growth Management Department Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 130 3.C.c PUBLICFaR ARING 1664 Vinland Way BOAT DOCK EXTENSION �-- To Allow a 41-foot Protrusion Petition No. PL20210001646 1 HEX. January 27, 2022 at 9 a.m. Growth Management Building 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, 609/610 John Kelly, Senior Planner: (239) 252-5719 :ate Packet Pg. 131 3.C.d NawrockiStefanie From: McLeanMatthew Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3:00 PM To: info@orickmarine.com Cc: ScottChris; NawrockiStefanie Subject: FW: Landings at Bear's Paw Holly, Per our phone call and your question yesterday, please see below on the offset requirement and from where is should be measured. Thanks. Come! r Couvay Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager Collier County Growth Management Department Development Review Division - Manager 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-8279 Fax: 239-252-6945 From: McLeanMatthew Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:13 AM To: dan@jrevansengineering.com; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Will J. Dempsey <wjdempsey@napleslaw.com>; StrainMark <MarkStrain@colliergov.net> Cc: 'Greg Wardeberg' <gwardeberg@gmail.com>; ScottChris <ChrisScott@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw Dan, The LDC definition of Mean high-water line (MHW) identifies the intersection of the tidal plane of mean high water with shore as established by per the FL Coastal Mapping Act of 1974 Laws of Florida. Within the state law "mean high water" is the average height of the high waters over a 19 year period; therefore, the County recognizes the original MHW condition as one of the parameters for measuring the boat dock setback. For this particular project, this is the most restrictive measurement. As long as the docks do not protrude 20 feet past that original controlling MHW line, then no BDE is required. The approved PPL plans show this dimension as 20 feet from the controlling MHW line and will suffice for the site review/approval. Please provide a copy of this email along with the building permit application resubmittal. Thanks. Co9er county Packet Pg. 132 3.C.d Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager Collier County Growth Management Department Development Review Division - Manager 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-8279 Fax: 239-252-6945 From: dan@jrevansengineerinci.com Finailto:dan(7a irevansengineerinct.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:49 AM To: BosiMichael; Will J. Dempsey; StrainMark Cc: McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg' Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw First, I would like to thank everyone for reviewing this matter on behalf of the developer. It is sincerely appreciated If you need any further information from me in order to finalize your review/decision re: the BDE, or if you would like to meet with me today or at any time, please advise. Otherwise, if a decision has (or will be) made on the BDE, please advise on how to appropriately document that a BDE is not required, and that the approved PPL and ICP permits (PL20120002819 and PL20150000357, respectively) suffice for review/approval of the building permit for the docks. Sincere thanks, Daniel C. Hartley, P.E. J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 Estero, FL 33928 www.orevansengineering.com c (239) 250-9408 From: BosiMichael [mailto:MichaelBosi@colliergov.nc! Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 8:22 AM To: Will J. Dempsey; StrainMark Cc: McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg'; dan(dWevansengineering.com Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw Great job, Mark and Matt and thanks for all, working together to get the best decision within the code. bosi From: Will J. Dempsey [mailto:wjdempsey(&napleslaw.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:43 AM To: StrainMark Cc: BosiMichael; McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg'; 'dan@jrevansengineering.com' Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw Thanks Mark and Matt. Matt, I got your voicemail yesterday. I was (and am still) scrambling to stay on top of a number of client commitments and either Dan or I will get back to you today. Packet Pg. 133 3.C.d Thanks again gents, CHEFFYPASSIDOMO ATTORNEYS AT LAW Will J. Dempsey Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Lawyer Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile wjdempsey .naplesiaw.com www.napleslaw.com This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you), please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us (collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. From: StrainMark[trlaiito:MarkStrain@colliergov.netj Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:40 AM To: Will J. Dempsey Cc: BosiMichael; McLeanMatthew;'Greg Wardeberg';'dan@jrevansengineering.com' Subject: RE: Landings at Bear's Paw I believe this has been resolved and no BDE is needed, Matt Mclean has the details. But.....1 am always available to meet. Matrk, 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address re Leased in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Will J. Dempsey[rnailto:wjdempsey(c7pnapleslaw.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 2:30 PM To: StrainMark Cc: BosiMichael; McLeanMatthew; 'Greg Wardeberg'; 'dan@jrevansengineering.com' Subject: Landings at Bear's Paw Good afternoon Mark: 3 Packet Pg. 134 3.C.d Would you have time this week to huddle up on a Boat Dock Extension request for the Landings at Bear's Paw? This is the triangular residential project on the Golden Gate Canal and between Bear's Paw and the Gordon River Greenway. I'm available pretty much any time starting Wednesday through end of week. Thanks Mark, CHEFFY PASSIDOMO A770RNf.YS A7 LAa' Will J. Dempsey Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Lawyer Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile widem pseya.napleslaw.com www.nai)leslaw.com L n sm This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you), please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us (collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 135 3.C.e COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRBD2020104341501 PERMIT TYPE: MR ISSUED: 02-02-21 BY: APPLIED DATE: 10-20-20 MASTER #: COA: JOB ADDRESS: 1664 Vinland WAY, Vacant Land, Naples JOB DESCRIPTION: install new stationary and floating dock JOB PHONE: 1664 Vinland WAY, Vacant Land, Naples SUBDIVISION #: LOT: FLOOD MAP: FOLIO #: 54490010449 OWNER INFORMATION: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT LLLP PO BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: JOB VALUE: $90,000.00 SETBACKS FRONT: SEWER: CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE: APPROVAL DATE: 11-16-20 BLOCK: ZONE: ELEVATION: SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE: 3 5-49-25 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: NAPLES HOLDING GROUP LLC (DBA) DOCK MASTERS NAPLES 6089 TAYLOR RD #1 NAPLE, FL 34109 CERTIFICATE #:: Lcc20120003728 PHONE: 0220 TOTAL RES SOFT: 0 TOTAL COMM SOFT: 0 REAR: 20' MHWL LEFT: 15 WATER: RIGHT: 15 Per Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-01, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additiona stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Packet Pg. 136 L£6 '6d 18ADEd CD w Z y W � w2N-rc co M wZfQ. W wT LLL�i N3FgZjFu�� F Ow O ¢ Q �f=9Z W Fm¢ZG� V Za�oO'LLog�� o� W u o¢ n n g W n i�3nnWui— O'N W o ul ui» L' m 11 - L JLL'pdUaU- a M VOlaoli wo�•awaeuauq�ceornvvn 'A1NnO0a311100d0SOU003Nollend3H1d090NV 96n•e$ 6eZ):7(tld 9 S3OVd'99 )iOOS ltlld Ni a3aaoo3a SV mvd S,aV391V KCZ-Co9(99z):3 OHd SOWONVl 3H1 d09l i0ld0 NVId 101d MAIM FNNWld — lVMtl d"IVIMMOUM:: rare dIHSa3Nlatld'all lN3WdO13A30 Sa31VMOV3H Mddm�VA3^unsVOO i� MN33 SN37N0 n o F LL'N_N Z 0 ul KJ W z wzww 0 aw (0w y w waxwm o z� c o in goco W DU G' Q Xo o LL T.W W LL VN Z. wn i2• _ �O J W m Z O N O LL 82 ~ w wLL o,Wr ° wo oo ooFg �' aw o a OU' wzULL ¢ m pm, �a 2�U.Q S C� ¢ O O m aoaynz�w O 0W O ¢ LL U Ca907�}� idol mF wo W Z¢z�A900F� a0 WP zz a zg zf-o mwLLOzg<n.2 ZZ wN w ¢o om— zp¢ w�°¢°io��zy LLo a ZWOWMZWZEW we wO w �- LU Oromwz¢'IR 3=C7 a0 oW n.S' =30 Z,�zWa�augm�¢ Ur¢J WW 00 a W,Oj aoa' ffimwu"i° OF- >w 00 yLLIW WOLL JF== cov�ir Q WW U mLU Z i mono <0I-r ¢�YZ 'm v 9 U w0 w000 w jLL L7 Ol V JJ mU t-m co \ VP \ \ z u0 L- N \ W c3 i� \ w UN \ S UO \ W \\ w 0. O5p 0 w a �D U U O 3NN0 LLfiL� N W 3 S �m a�au3 Z J a u ¢ on K ZO zZ w0 rO OLLW z<NO 0rn T�Oao a z = N ¢ Z Q �>�-pK a m¢rwo>iil J¢FF,J�pIr it WI _ O W �SZ(WU' m ` UO— rL(5 ¢O VOpf WwFF c°�Ji daLL°zFMoo O� �0 nw cy) a \ \ U U O \ a'0'£ 3.C.e COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the county regulating building construction or use. For the following: PERMIT NBR: PRBD2020104341501 CO NBR: CO TYPE: COMP ADDRESS: 1664 Vinland WAY, Naples SUBDIVISION: LOT: BLOCK: STATUS: Finaled ISSUED DATE: April 26, 2021 SLUC CODE: UTILITY COMPANY: JOB DESC: install new stationary and floating dock 1664 Vinland WAY, Vacant Land, Naples OWNER: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT LLLP LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW LOT 15 T.R.S.: NUMBER OF METERS: Note: A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed, or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Packet Pg. 138 SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY SURVEY: GG210398 3.C.e '�:P- T W AB ydM• O \ � 5E A02 �V,� mow PRBD20201043415 SURVEY HAS SEEN REVIEWED SY ZONING FOR COMPl1ANCE o Jer County additional review notes:SURVEY REC'D. IETBACKS OKAY, DOCK, PROTRUSION 19.39', )IGITAL SIGNATURE VERIFIED SAFE UPLAND LINE ELEV: 1.00' (NAVD88) This information was provided 04/08/2021, / \ p5w y1. by Lamar Evers from Florida Deportment of ?0. Environmental Fynp5a E \ / Environmental Protection, Bureau of Survey °p �ga5,3E �23• \\ % \� °� c°v£ / /\ and Mapping. 0, Na 1101 LINE TABLE: L-1 N25°0955'W 25.00'P. N25v07'31'W 25.00 M. 0, a$ l� \ \ L-2 N25°09'55'W 37.W P. N25=0757W 37.05'M. 9 \ \ \ CURVE DETAILS C-1(P.) C-1(M) \ \ R=3 R = 37.W42.O �pVO \ `N AL = 42.OT AL = 42.OT 42.0 CL = 39.77 CL = 3979 CB=N57v4T42W CB=N57e4759W \ / A = 65=03'35' A = 65e0748' / / \ / B aO�e� \21 JILT « a - 11111,6�jj IN e u 3 a 3 w Z � 3�3o 3b°w u,ww. n�9�s`J9j�i�3izooevves>000e � e R$'�� ss 004 gig DOOM ss* eel '�'�"u�aw383 4�j7��oo 0 0 10' 20' DATE OF SURVEY DRAWN BY Swveyor s Notes Q011do03 / 09 / 2021 AV. L EG N OF TITLE FnOV Y SY O HE I NO ID EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS DMWING ME FROM ,I EYAMUTION OF TRIO IAADE BY SUIVEYdt THE NO THE RECORDED PLAT. ANY OTHER EAREMENT (3) V SwJVM IkAfdJ WTAE NDT ABSTRACTED FOR EASD.ETfrt PERTAINING TO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND (S) 1' Inch = 20' ft. CONFLETION DATE: DECKED BY d O EA RECaROED ENMIRNY£t NOT SAWN IX MUST BE FURNISHED TO HE HERVE OR BY THE GRAPHIC SCALE 04 / 06 / 2021 G.G. TIEPLAT. CLIENT OR THE CLIENTS AGENT PER FLORIDA Group Inc. T>NSTACEFt pNItIX1YFg E MDtDEdEED, STATUTE 'CHAPTER "IT OF THE FLORIDA RaNOTAmITFIGe NOFTIILE,ZONJCEA4]..ETIIS ADMINISTRATIVECODE PROPERTY AND OWNER INFORMATION oR Fn®o^I moel ENcusRNras o—SHP, OR 1LADDRIONs oR DELEnons TO SURv MAPS OR RK•HTSOFWAY. REPORTS BY DINER THAN THE SHBNING PARTY OR Galldo Group Inc. (LB8223) Property Address Parcel 1D. County/Stole AUOEAaAO ID Pq KN Cf FOO NG(FIXMA MXS PARTIES IS PROHIBITEOWI HOETWRIT ENCONSENT OP. OTER AfROVEAENTt WERE NOT LOCATm. WALL OFTNESIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. 52375UMMERLIN COMMONS BLVD 1664 VINAND WAY To BE iR. PARCEL WAS SURVEYED FROM INFORMATION 54490010449 Colller/Florido, To TCRECCNSTRUCTSOUDMIYLNE; SUPPLIED BV THE CLIENT. SUITE411 FORTMYERS,FL 33907 NAPLES,FL34g5..NorvALDwRHwrTIESIwAIwESORION.LRusm 15 ENCEOWNERSHIPNOTDETERMINED. Tel: 833-425-5364 Fox: 833-425-5363 SEAL OF A FLORIDA LIOBNSED RRVEYCR AND M R 14,THE ACCURACY OF CONTROL SURVEY DATA Certified to.. Le�Description A3 FunlshedA3 7urnlshed. OI1Y WSBLE ENOiOAM�NTt LOGIED. SHALL BE VERIFIED BY REDUNDANT MEASUREMENTS contort@golldo.cLTm www.golldo.com SMSSIRVEI'HNTPDED FOR CONSTRLCTDN RAPO53 OR TRAVERSE CLOSURES. ALL CONTROL �, �yN AynWy un HsmA aPwIHY wa, FEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT -P. ITs LOT IS, LANDINGS AT BEARS PAW, according to CfLY.EXO.USNFLYFORTNSUBEBYTHOSETOW nTo MEASUREMENTS SHALL ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING Br RagvN afhaaexm wr CC8350l8 and/or assigns and the DEpartmanl the dal thereof os recorded h PIOI Book SA CERIFED.11aSARVEYUTORE USm FORCdaIRUCTIOty CLOSURES: O.p F L W1 FAC. P,, r la u.IN� 4R 7, Fv of HousingP and Urban D8WIG MBnl a4 their Poge B, of the PubI1c Records of COLLIER —THS OR OPfN USE IS NOT VALD COMMERCIAIMIGH RISK UNEAN: 1' FOOT IN 1%0sir MmNn interests may appear. COUNTY, Florida. 6WNO�FFFTO�RT WAS IMOE�TfOPROYE MTBOIfOMEi SU URBAN:UNEAR:IFOOTIN1.—FEET: Guillermo d1Y AEROWgRS pWN WERELOG ED. RURAL LINEARIFOOTINBONYFEET; aDNENSDMARE NFE T AN'SEUMLSTIEIEOf. 13. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON !� Flood Zone InformotlorT 9. PAR01 AIB.ER TO EASD.EM; PlSIRICTDAq N81.6006E ALONG THE CEN A. Guerrero CCRYrenllylNoa:Collle COnly REEAVAT N AORGR-0FWAY56RECdD. wev.ee,.. . .BMOEGEYdLSMC ComisaatylNu:I2DD67 GUILLERMO A. GUERRERO Panel: 0391 SOffiR:H Professiandx veyw and MoARer EffaCUve Dote05/16/2012 PSMW.6453 StoleofFlarido Flood Zone:AE BFE=7.0' Packet Pg. 139 � - -PL Zn2_1 boo I HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A. Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) orthe Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN "BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT." Planner responsible for providing the County Attorne -drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT — STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY -MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES -THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. Application, to include but not limited to the following: Narrative of request ✓ Property Information &,-' Property Ownership Disclosure Form ✓ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) Affidavit of Unified Control Affidavit of Repeserrtatrion ✓ Drawings (may include Cross -Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) ✓ Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Environmental Data Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver Utility Letter Deviation Justifications ek,,., Revised5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDESPlanningServices\Current\ZoningStafflnfornnationlJobAidesorHelpGuides Packet Pg. 140 3.C.f ✓ Boundary Survey ✓Other documents, as needed, on a case -by -case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. ✓ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. ✓ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent's/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same or for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 12/08/2021 Slignature of Agent Representative Date Jeff Rogers Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning services\Current\Zoning Staff InformationVob Aides or Help Guides Packet Pg. 141 3.C.f Coley County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0 0 L DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION 0 E LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): WOT DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): David Gilmour Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 16992 Verona Ln Telephone: E-Mail Address: Cell: Name of Agent(s): Jeff Rogers Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. city: Naples State: FL Address: 3584 Exchange Ave city: Naples Telephone:239-643-0166 Celi:239-784-0081 E-Mail Address: jell@thanaples.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 35/ 49/ 25 Subdivision: Landings at Bear's Paw Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 1664 Vinland Way, Naples, FL 34105 Fax: ZIP: 34110 State: FL ZIP: 34104 Fax. 239-643-6632 Property I.D. Number: Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RPUD May 8, 2018 54490010449 Unit: 35 Lot: 49 S Block: 25E Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 142 Co er County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N RPUD Landings at Bear's Paw S RSF-4 & A Residential Single-family & Golden Gate Canal E RPUD Residential Single -Family W RPUD Residential Single -Family DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): See attached SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 135 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ICI survey ❑ visual estimate ❑ other (specify) 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 67 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. Required: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 33.3 ft. S. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 30 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities inclose proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: Majority of the waterfront homes along the subject shoreline have docks which most have been granted BDE's. As proposed the dock is consistent with the other previous approved docks and their overall protrusion. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.23 Acres May 8, 2018 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 143 Coffer County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last ear? Yes [ No If es lease provide copies. p p Y Y L .� Y, p p p� PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (Mi_T). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) May 8, 2018 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 144 3.C.f Co e-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 1 must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) May 8, 2018 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 145 Coer County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code i ne roiiowing �,uamittai Kequirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ® ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Signed and Sealed Survey 1 Chart of Site Waterway 1 Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 Li❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ® ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ® ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 1 materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. May 8, 2018 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 146 cAaer County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS— INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Other: ❑ ement: Dan Summers; and/orTO �Artice Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑ An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Sig a u e of Pe loner or Agent ��ao,zr Date May 8, 2018 Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 147 3.C.f Narrative Description: The proposed Boat Dock Extension request is for a single-family dock located within the Landings at Bears Paw development along the Gordon River. This section of the Gordon River bottom lands is owned by the development/HOA as well as the rip -rap shoreline which is why we had the HOA provide us with a letter of support. The proposed project consists of installing a new boatlift onto the existing floating dock. The project has been designed to be consistent in regard to the overall protrusion with the other previously approved docks that also required a BDE along the same subject development shoreline. As proposed the dock will protrude approximately 41-feet from the top of rip -rap and approximately 33.3-feet from the mean high water line therefore we are requesting a 13.3- foot extension from the allowed 20-feet. The subject waterway is approximately 135-feet wide and as proposed the dock will protrude approximately 25% into the subject waterway. The required side yard setbacks as outlined within the RPUD documents are 7.5-feet and as proposed the dock will provide the required setbacks. Additionally, the RPUD also allows the Landings at Bear's Paw development have up to 38 boat slips along their shoreline. The community dock accommodates 9 slips, and the remaining slips (29) are for the residences along the river which are allowed 2 slips per lot. The proposed dock is one of the allowed 29 slips along the river. Packet Pg. 148 Co)r Qwnt 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAH: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the R C. CILCI[Ldk{C LII SUL11 IIILUICSL. I Name and Address I % of Ownership David Gilmour If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the CI LCI[LUKC VI ![[Lerr�L. Created 9/28/2017 Name and Address I % of Ownership I Pagel of 3 Packet Pg. 149 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.calliergov.net C, e f. g• Co*er County 3.C.f 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAH: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the enerai ano/or ilmltea partners: Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the iilcers, swcfflUIOers, VerlellUdr Ies, Ur Pdr LneI S: Name and Address °� of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or Of IIL:erb, lid {.UI PUI dLIUI I, PdI LI ICI JI lipp UI LI uzlt- Name and Address Date subject property acquired 3-Zl` -Z I ❑ Leased: Term Of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 2 U 0 0 L 0 E C9 c �o c c� w 0 m co 0 0 0 o_ N 0 N J IL CO) r` rn 0 N Packet Pg. 150 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Coder County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand thatfailure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature b,*Ylo P. 6;im.*— Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 7-r--zl Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 151 Co*,r County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: BDE DateandTime: Tuesday 1/20/2021 3:00 PM Bridge lin Assigned Planner: John Kelly Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 1664 Vinland Way (BDE) ai tt. 20210001646 Property ID #: 54490010449 Current Zoning: RPUD -Landings at Bear' s Paw Project Address: 1664 Vinland Way City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34105 Applicant• Jeff Roqers, Turell,Hall & Associates, Inc. Agent Name: Jeff Rogers Agent/Firm Address: 3584 Exchange Ave Property Owner: David W.Gilmour Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: - 2 3 Phone. 239-643-0166 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34104 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 152 3.C.f Co*lr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 0 ❑ www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 0 E Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app = Note - link is httl)s://www.colliercountvfl.qov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 W m n /� �/��c/s3GEr �GFa9�E �jcr�Grsi.� v0=; 4 —,,Abetn�`tS l�nT /ZE NLE.� C r N O N i,� F%act PGF/lSE � ✓sc. ./vim-,».�rasJ .�,� c.�,9ss�t�JA•s /15<.,i,�hsE "'�— ii /'� � tX�ievi i4 Sc'c�0� � �2v✓.rA� I G� Nam,•-�r.3� o�' ,9tc.o+-�i[ic� S4�s Fn- '3d�-i cats P�,�t� Sr��c.�- F,g•ti,�.�, log >�� 0 — w , 77ti,J .ayE P,ca,'� &/t sF Pk oviaE FF, c is r c�PPo6�iN 4 to JC;i✓b �cvrir4n1C� O O 0 %}1iSi¢c��/I Ci r N O N J a W m m a� c� Y C1 f� IL a 0 Y V m X W 2 If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the W petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(@naa1—es-qo—y.com E Allyson Holland AMHolland(aDnaplesgov.com Robin Singer RSinger(o)naples_gov.com Erica Martin emartin(@naplesgov.com Q Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided E of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all 0 required data. r Q Updated 1/12/2021 Page 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 153 3.C.f Pre -Application Meeting Notes GMD - Zoning Services Planner: John Kelly (239)252-5719 John. kellyAcolliercount}_fl.gov Boat Dock Extension • Complete the required application; respond to each question and sign • Refer to the Final Submittal Requirement Checklist and provide/submit required documents o All submitted plans must be legible when duplicated on 8.5" X 11" standard paper o The final recording of documents is in black & white; minimize the use of color • Provide a Boundary Survey to demonstrate water frontage and lot dimensions as well as the principal use of the subject property • Either as part of the application, or on a separate sheet, provide a detailed Narrative Statement fully describing the project and what is being requested • On a sheet separate from the application, please provide persuasive and convincing responses to each of the Primary and Secondary Criteria contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.H o state if each criterion has been satisfied or not satisfied o provide sufficient evidence to support any claims such as insufficient water depth, unique characteristics of the property or waterfront, width of waterway and/or canal • Site Plans o Site Plans should be measured in feet o Note that the dock facility includes any docked vessel(s); show vessel(s) on plan o Demonstrate width of property and/or the total property water frontage o Demonstrate side and/or riparian setbacks for the dock facility o Demonstrate amount of dock protrusion using such points of measure as are contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.C.1, Measurement of Dock Protrusion. • Note that dock facilities should be minimized to allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel(s) for loading, unloading, and routine maintenance without the use of excessive deck area Boathouse • See above for general information • On a sheet separate from the application, please provide persuasive and convincing responses to each of the Boathouse Criteria contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.17 o state if each criterion has been satisfied or not satisfied o provide sufficient evidence to support any claims such as insufficient water depth, unique characteristics of the property or waterfront, width of waterway and/or canal • Site Plans o Demonstrate setback requirements from property and riparian lines, demonstrate the separation from other structures on the site, Demonstrate height of boathouse and type of roof, note that the roof alone may overhang up to 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or setback (plans must show the amount of roof overhang) RPacket Pg. 154 3.C.f Co*;r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes - n/ V lU� N n t .E .titer! Z ik U +2 5 i Vl��+ lC `k,c�a i , _ S_'6? x- _? nC A PA-& .34- Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 155 3.C.f ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 4:54 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App RESEARCH for 1660 Vinland Way (BDE) - PL20210001645- Wednesday 7/14/21 at 3:00 PM via SKYPE or Bridge Attachments: Boat Dock Extension Checklist 2016.doc Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Good afternoon Thomas, Here are my notes for the Pre-app: Please provide a benthic survev with an exhibit to indicate the location of seagrasses or oyster beds within 200 feet of the proposed docking facility. LDC Section 5.03.06.J Please provide a description of the shoreline and any native vegetation present Indicate any proposed impacts to the native shoreline vegetation (approximate area in square feet to be impacted). Please provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria #5 and #6 See LDC section 5.03.06. H.2 If lighting is proposed please provide a description of the type and locations on the docking facility. Please provide any written authorization from any state and federal agencies if any approvals have been obtained. Craig Brown Senior Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 5:46 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BeardLaurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; PollarclBrandi <Brandi.Pollard@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: KellyJohn <John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov>; YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@ colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre-App RESEARCH for 1660 Vinland Way (BDE) - PL20210001645- Wednesday 7/14/21 at 3:00 PM via SKYPE or Bridge Good Afternoon All, Packet Pg. 156 3.C.f Residential Boat Dock Extension Checklist Submerged Resources Survey Checklist Is there an overlay? ST overlay needs an ST permit (much of Isle of Capri & Keewaydin has an ST Overlay over the water) 2. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph. (LDC 5.03.06 I) Provide a submerged resources survey from an Environmental Consultant done between April and October. P530 3. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least ten feet from any existing seagrass beds, or meet restrictions for continuous beds. (LDC 5.03.06 J.) P530 4. Provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria #5 & #6. (Use Misc in CV) Demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized. (LDC 5.03.06 J .4) P530 6. The dock shall be field adjusted to minimize impacts to mangroves. (LDC 5.03.06 I.2) Remove this checklist item — look at LDC? P530 7. Provide a clearing plan for removal of any vegetation related to the boat dock. This is simply an information exhibit being requested. (Use Misc in CV) 8. Are there any draft restrictions? Look at the MPP. (Use Misc in CV) Keewaydin: BDE not required for Keewaydin - Most always need an ST permit related to a Building Permit— water and land have ST Overlay Seagrass: Light penetration is needed to survive, usually in more shallow areas Submerged Resources Survey: - Read thoroughly - Check location description for street & waterway (if given) - Check to see if it was uploaded to CV - Indicate in CV "Comments box" if one was done & if it was uploaded to CV *****SEE SUGGESTED FORMAT OF SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ON NEXT PAGE***** Packet Pg. 157 3.C.f MULTI SLIP DOCKING FACILITY • Look at supplemental criteria in 5.05.02 o Port of the Islands uses different Rating system — see MPP • See 5.03.06 E 11 and 5.05.02 for Manatee awareness requirements for multi -slip docking facilities Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this LDC. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated). Packet Pg. 158 3.C.f SUGGESTION FORMAT AND INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ➢ Location of survey — property address and folio# o The survey shall indicate any seagrass or seagrass beds located within 200 feet on any proposed dock facility (5.03.06.J). In order for this to be accomplished, any within 200 feet of the proposed dock (within the riparian lines of the property and adjacent to the property) shall be surveyed. ➢ Who did the survey — which firm and their contact information including name, address, phone #, email ➢ What date was the survey conducted? Guidance from FCC is to dui between Awl :axid3ctber o Weather conditions, water temperature, low tide & high tide times ➢ Objective of Survey & Work done on the site o Was the site snorkeled? o What methodologies were used? o Was a GPS used? o Was an aerial photograph reviewed and used to establish survey transect lines? ➢ Results o What was found? Substrate and what kind? Seagrass, shell, oysters? o What was along the shoreline? Mangroves, seawall, etc? o Why does the consultant think no submergerd resources were found? o Other observations ➢ When seagrass is found, include all requirements of LDC section 5.03.06. J. ➢ Conclusions o Were any submerged resources found? If yes, what? o Are any impacts to submerged resources expected or proposed? ➢ Pictures (suggested angles) o Looking toward and away from the shoreline o The proposed location of the boat access o Observations in the water - Any oyster debris, shell, seagrass 5.03.06. J. (LDC section up to date as of 2016) Protection of seagrass beds. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed docks, dock facilities, or boathouses shall be protected through the following standards: 1. Where new docking facilities or boat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a scale of 1 inch to 200 feet when available from the County, or a scale of 1 inch to 400 feet when such photographs are not available from the County. The location of seagrass beds shall be verified by the County Manager or designee prior to issuance of any project approval or permit. 2. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds, except where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, and to minimize negative impacts to seagrasses and other native shoreline, emergent and submerged vegetation, and hard bottom communities. 3. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, the applicant shall be allowed to build a dock across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet of seagrass beds. Such docking facilities shall comply with the following conditions: a. The dock shall be at a height of at least 3.5 feet NGVD. b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 160 square feet. c. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet. d. The access dock and terminal platform shall be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds possible. Packet Pg. 159 3.C.f The petitioner shall be required to demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized prior to any project approval or permit issuance. Packet Pg. 160 Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20210001646 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jackie De la Osa North Collier Fire 252-2312 jdelaosa@northcollierfire.com ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy. Frantz@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov IV John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf Zoning Senior Planner 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynmch@colliercountyfl.gov ElThomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.astroberto@colIiercountyfLgov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 3.C.f Packet Pg. 161 3.C.f Colr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 a ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 bra ndy.otero@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email TrF Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 162 3.C.f Co ter County Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20210001646 — 1664 Vinland Way (BDE) Planner- John Kelly PRE-APP INFO Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Jeremy Frantz,(Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Jeff Rogers, Turrell Hall & Associates Inc. Jeff@thanaples.com 239-643-0166 • Agent to list for PL# Jeff Rogers, Turrell,Hall & Associates,lnc • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) David W. Gilmour • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) BIDE • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Boat dock extension for parcel number 54490010449 in Bear's Paw • Details about Project: BIDE — See attached exhibits REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-68 Q April 5, 2017 P Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Created A Zoring Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Fbida 34104.239-252-2400 • www.collergov.net Packet Pg. 163 Co Aer County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the 0 C. CIL,CIILC19tf VI JUL,II IIIICICJL: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership I If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the CIL.CIILd}'.,C UI IflLefeSL: Created 9/28/2017 Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 164 Ax Collier County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the e f Cis ellerdi dna/or nmiiea partners: _ Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the L II I I J, 3LVl,IR1IVIVCI J, VCIICI IL.Id11CJ, VI YdI LIICI�: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or re— .1 - of Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease , U1 LI UJL: Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 165 Go(& County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 166 3.C.f Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Establishment Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code i ne ToHowing Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey 0 ❑ Chart of Site Waterway ❑ ❑ ❑ Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 [r ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 [ ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: 6/26/2020 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 167 GOAT County 3.C.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Other: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS: v Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 Pre -Application Meeting, if required: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees; a new pre - application meeting may be required.) e' Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 L�-'An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Signature of Petitioner or Agent 6/26/2020 Date Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 168 3.C.f PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion Met Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 67-ft. The zoning and upland land use is a single-family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC-LDC as well as the approved PUD. The current proposed dock design has 1 optional boat slip. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Criterion Met Response: See attached survey/drawing illustrating the existing shoreline and associated base of riprap. At the 20-foot protrusion line taken from the SUL/MHWL there is just insufficient water to accommodate the vessel nor boatlift which is still partially over the riprap. Therefore, there is insufficient water depths to moor a vessel or provide safe access to the docking facility within the 20- foot protrusion mark. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion Met Response: The proposed docking facility will not have any adverse impacts on navigation as it will only protrude 33.3-feet from the SUL/MHWL into the waterway that is approximately 135-feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate Packet Pg. 169 3.C.f space for navigation through this waterway as well as provides sufficient space for a dock to be built across the waterway from the subject property and still have adequate space for navigation. Additionally, the proposed dock protrusion is consistent with the other previously approved docks along the subject shoreline. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion Met Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 33.3-feet from the SUL/MHWL into a waterway that is 135' wide from MHWL to MHWL. The proposed dock protrudes approximately 25% into the waterway and therefore as proposed the dock does meet this criterion. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion Met Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 7.5-foot setbacks from both property/riparian lines. The approved PUD for the Landings at Bears Paw development only requires 7.5-feet setbacks for a docking facility that is parallel to the shoreline. The dock design and location has been designed to be located within the required setbacks, provide safe access with a vessel, and not interfere with any future neighboring docking facilities that maybe constructed. Packet Pg. 170 3.C.f SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Response: The proposed dock facility was primarily governed by the County guidelines and the approved PUD for the Landings at Bear's Paw. The one special condition that has affected the overall proposed dock protrusion is the fact that the dock is existing, and the proposed project consist of installing a boatlift onto the existing structure which currently protrudes 20-feet. Due to this the overall dock will now protrude further out into the waterway to reach out to adequate water depths to safely moor the vessel and allow the boatlift to function properly as well as the dock as it is an existing floating dock. Criterion Met 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been minimized in order to meet the County dock building guidelines, the approved PUD, and be constructed within the 25% width of waterway. The proposed protrusion is consistent with the other dock designs that have been approved within this same development along the subject shoreline. The design also provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock. Criterion Met 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 30-feet which is less than 50% the subject property's linear waterfront footage. Therefore, this criterion is met. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) Response: The proposed dock facility will be one of potentially 14 other single-family docking facilities allowed to be constructed along this shoreline not including the HOA docking facility. The proposed dock has been designed within the designated setback area as outlined in the approved PUD document for this development. The proposed docking facility design is consistent with others on this waterway and will not affect neighboring properties view of the waterway. Criterion Met Packet Pg. 171 3.C.f 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. Criterion Met 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. Packet Pg. 172 3.C.f AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) � ( 000 &!o 4, I, DavidG11mour (print name), as 0 t-,Y)'e-./*— (title, if applicable) of _ 6 ,V V�h � (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) o erM applicant contract purchaserFland that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal wonting hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize To-11. Hera AssoaaasjncJ Jeff Rogers to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 4 through 2 above. 'Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • Ir the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words 'as trustee", • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that i have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts state In It are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER i ? The forego g instrum t was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on U 2121 (date) i1/I d �I �VA no (name of person iding o th o� r ation), 0 Wt1[ who is personal) kno� to me or w ha produced (type of identification) as identification. �� f STAMP/SEAL Signature of Notary Public ti►a� • �= JOHNSON ON COLLEEN ANN:H2 Notary Public . Stalorida Commission N H16µYComm, Expires 201� Aonded through Natbnal,rssn. CI1108470A-00115\ 155 REV 3124/14 Packet Pg. 173 v9n 3a8 MWOWOZ-ld £L60Z) 9MOOMOZ-1d 3a8-GBL'A3Bd dnjoe8 X3H - 3 IUGwt43B;Id :;U8W vi 7{ ` M b ro T I/, 1, " U Llr y £ •I h L 14 IRV P L«W �) V� ' n a ♦ Y 0 ry 0 IJ LrL Lr� 0 W L� r U) N J G D 6 w a C/)6 o LU �. LL w� Q Y G Q F U W LU ma O U)w IL } J z O 1) W W CO d Z �O aH z O U 1 r LLI z::) � W H � Z 0� �Z 0 < Z -i-j d �O WO U�� Of Q Z 0 LLJ Q p H W 3 z Z �zm J §o Q J zzW oW J A-,w WQ OA(0C �w0 wiz FAQ U LnC 0 z0 :1. '0 ■1' ee� pA20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 1/3/2022 V99� 308 9 WOOLZOZ-1d : £1606 9 WOOLZOZ-1d 3(38-06e)Ped dnjoeg X3H - 3;u8wt43ejjv :;u8w / W Z_ J i W a_ Q to 0 d � W m Z Q Q LL A Z (n F W v a CARD Z r, rW z J ^W LL O Of I..L z g W _ Z_ V z H Y U U w 110000 7� 00 � O Y \ m L.L ` �! I 0 ` `\ a. A ri z 0 Z o W f a W W Z W n w �?N a 0QS .04 . a �0 ..d 0 jO �aX Q Z Kwx 5 W Q ¢ W Z Op � W F O + a 0 W Z U 7 QUO wH= W= O f n 2 w '.4O =ay aZ�yoo�3 vtO�wrw¢� ° n ate¢ o 3oo�°yo>3�?z �OwzO Zoo=3 o¢ _ Lu ww��v�iaNrQ�� W xK<w I.-<w H ?¢m 3� 2 ri IFW , I p\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 1/3/2022 z Q a W _ _Z � J w 3 0 w o� �w q; M V99� 308 ML000LZOZ-1d : £L60Z) ML000LZOZ-1d 308-06eVed dnjoeg X3H - A IuGwt43ellV :;uaua N z Qw Y4_✓✓✓ili��`. V Z _ Al Y z MQ W LL O L.L O W (D z z J C/) F X of W ^W LL O GLL LL p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland I 3 I'M Q CO w � Cn LL OX O Q `' 0� O CO m Cp. A(3 O z z U W LL 0 \J z G2 op C 0 20 3 O Z ° w ¢ W w W rp w z O � U N N Q O N S A1. LL 2 OCo NX N ai a ~O ..Xa z >0 tea¢ o. �n ?X MJ 9 N a w= y W V Yi 5¢. W Q wzoO 2Uf +'S,7S aOw O O Q cot rA� a W�20 ONE �� Wc �yQO aiw> ¢ ern W ¢ z zO=ofofH w nV 3¢J: wJ�w>j OU ZwW>>Q�Q a -Q WQ.- z�HX WQF� 2 aOQwoUoZ W Fl?Qw a?wscO�¢- ¢w3� �0 o'Rr z a <W _z_ Q' J IMES PLAN 1/3/2022 V99� 308 ML000LZOZ-1d : £L60Z) ML000LZOZ-1d 308-06eVed dnjoeg X3H - 3;uGwLl3el}d :;uOw 00 90 ,I 00 Q 00 U) Iz \\\� v W \/\/ p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland V99� 308 ML000LZOZ-1d £L60Z) ML000LZOZ-1d 308-a6e)Ped dnjoe8 X3H - 3 IuGwt43e;;d :;uOwt43e;; 00 cCli d d 0 LO U LU z � w LL Z 1i O W Z i \ O� � � LU w jam C4ZM -77 ` d Z W ��a 31' r X Q M — O o ILIL J Off' 2 0 -s � L L s ,•fs - ` A —. Illy`^ O = Z _ p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 1/3/2022 V99� 308 9 WOOLZOZ-1d : £1606 9 WOOLZOZ-1d 308-06eVed dnjoeg X3H - 3;u8wt43ejjv :;u8w `i s 0 A-- 1 MA M CZ LO wM Z J Q Y. �! t Z :n W > w ova (0Q -Z v-. w w0 w w 0 0 0 LL <000 . w w w��0. 0 w 2 a �Or 0 m ~ z z00- :, • \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ w \ \ H ry w 0- 0 ^LL LL f — 1 i rth�, p:\20107 dock masters\20107.14 dock masters-1664 vinland way\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20107.14-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 1/3/2022 �00000 �seese • 3.C.f Jeff Rogers From: Sent: To: StrainMark <MarkStrain@colliergov.net> Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:17 PM Jeff Rogers This is what found in an email sent by Matt to the applicant: The LDC definition of Mean high-water line (MHW) identifies the intersection of the tidal plane of mean high water with shore as established by per the FL Coastal Mapping Act of 1974 Laws of Florida. Within the state law "mean high water" is the average height of the high waters over a 19 year period; therefore, the County recognizes the original MHW condition as one of the parameters for measuring the boat dock setback. For this particular project, this is the most restrictive measurement. As long as the docks do not protrude 20 feet past that original controlling MHW line, then no BIDE is required. The approved PPL plans show this dimension as 20 feet from the controlling MHW line and will suffice for the site review/approval. Please provide a copy of this email along with the building permit application resubmittal. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. S: 0 0 0 E c� _ w 0 CO W Iq O O O N O N J a ch ti O O N Packet Pg. 180 3.C.f July 6, 2021 Collier County Government RE: The Landings at Bear's Paw —1664 Vinland Way Installation of Boat Lift Request To Whom It May Concern: This letter is intended to notify Collier County that the Landings at Bear's Paw Homeowner's Association, Inc. Board of Directors has reviewed and approved the proposed dock project, located at the property referenced above. The subject property is allowed a dock with up to two boat slips as outlined within the approved RPUD. As proposed the dock and boatlift meet all the community design criteria and therefore, we trust that our approval will allow the County to proceed with their review of the proposed Boat Dock Extension application. Should you have any questions, please contact me at: 239.436.1500. Sincerely, 4-1-t:ZQ George A. Wilson President Landings at Bear's Paw Homeowner's Association, Inc. Packet Pg. 181 3.C.f ORDINANCE NO. 13- 6 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-3 AND W-4 (ST/W-3 AND ST/W-4) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-3 AND W-4 (ST/W-3 AND ST/W-4) FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW RPUD TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND UP TO 38 BOAT SLIPS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE GOLDEN GATE CANAL SOUTH OF BEAR'S PAW IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 10.75 ± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PETITION RZ-PL20120002095) WHEREAS, John Passidomo, Esquire and William Dempsey, Esquire of Cheffy Passidomo, P.A., representing Headwaters Development Limited Liability Limited Partnership LLLP, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property; and WHEREAS, the Special Treatment zones ST/W-3 and ST/W-4 are not changed by this rezone. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from an Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 25 residential dwelling units and up to 38 boat slips in accordance with Exhibits "A" through "G", Landings at Bear's Paw\RZ-PL20120002095 1 of 2 Rev. 10/28/ 13 Packet Pg. 182 3.C.f EXHIBIT E LIST OF LDC DEVIATIONS NOTE: Nothing in this PUD Document shall approve a deviation to the LDC unless it is listed in this Exhibit E. 1. Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, "Street System Requirements," which states that dead-end streets are prohibited except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow the internal dead-end street to terminate in a "T" junction vehicular turnaround, as generally depicted on the Conceptual Master Plan. Final location and dimensions of the "T" junction shall be determined at the time of site development plan approval, and shall meet local fire district standards. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements," and Appendix B, "Typical Street Sections," which establish a 60-foot width for local roads, to allow a 50-foot wide road in accordance with the internal right of way cross section attached under Exhibit C. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02A.2., "Sidewalks and Bike Lane Pathway Requirements," which requires sidewalks on both sides of a right-of-way or easement internal to a site, to allow for a sidewalk to be constructed along one side of the right-of-way, including the western terminus of the "T" junction described in Deviation # 1, above. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.06.E.5., "Dock Facilities," which requires dock facilities to have a side setback of 15 feet for dock facilities on lots with greater than 60 feet of water frontage, to allow a 7.5-foot side setbacks for the private single-family community dock facilities located along that section of Golden Gate Canal within the Residential Tract; provided that such slips are parallel to (rather than perpendicular to) the shoreline. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G. L, "Open Space Requirements," which requires that PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and accessory uses to devote at least 60 percent of the gross area to usable open space, to allow at least 50 percent of the gross area to be devoted to usable open space; provided, however, that landscaping internal to the project shall be provided in substantial conformity with the conceptual enhanced landscape plan attached hereto as Exhibit H. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.b., "Fences and Walls," which permits walls at a maximum height of 6 feet in the rear and side yards of designated residential components of PUDs, to allow walls at a maximum height of 8 feet in the non - waterfront rear and side yards of the residential lots. 7. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B. Lb., "Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts," which requires signs within residential PUDs to be The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 6 of 12 PUDZ-PL20120002095 October 24, 2013 Packet Pg. 183 3.C.f located no closer than 10 feet from the property line or from the edge of the roadway, paved surface, or back of curb, as applicable, to allow project entry signage to be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line. 8. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.1. "Alternate A: Landscape Buffer," which requires a ten -foot -wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center, to allow a modified Alternate A Landscape Buffer with trees spaced an average of 45 feet on center for that portion of the project adjacent to the Golden Gate Canal. The equivalent number of trees otherwise required by the 30-foot spacing shall be provided within the Alternative A. Landscape Buffer located on the Residential Tract along the Golden Gate Canal. The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 7 of 12 PUDZ-PL20120002095 October 24, 2013 Packet Pg. 184 3. L SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY SURVEY:GG P�aPKO o A9tP\ / p920��. �ZQ// �$� < '44P��ooE F 9. 9 G \vO / RIVE o\7 N F 9 AI lF- c ztFa 500h3 3 /�/PfN� ° D '?° elg .� � bA A95/� av+ PN Np.O SAFE UPLAND LINE ELEV=1.00(NAVD88) /. b �pA E �03 / This information was provided 04/08/2021, / by Lamar Evers from Florida Department of PGee 9tisooAp&c' .;: Nbaa AbTE b / Environmental Protection, Bureau of Survey Nb P \ and Mapping. IK \ \ 'P N�°& �O D s Nd; \ m o- \ 0 O \ so LINE TABLE: o D. r U\ L-1 N25°09'S5'W 25.0P. 25°07'31'W 25.00' M. A �vo N^ Al L-2 N25°09'55'W 37.00' P. N25°09'57'W 37.05'M. J N 4 \ \ CURVE DETAILS K \ 1 (1 N 7.00' oO 37.00' R =3 R = AL = 42.01' AL = 42.01' �t / CL= 39.79' CL= 39.79' CB=N57°41'42'W CB=N57°42'59'W \ / / 4 = 65°03'35' 4 = 65°0248' / \ a ,£ / 2p6 / 000°� oaf, �NCY'E / "ecllz 6�\� S�µfPSEMENt b1 �\ b H �Fi ar�b zQEr O 3 aw >z>W .yeE O a w �r -� 0 Wow£ r pzo to EI +�z �i "g� aE 'p"ZOz azzzU az _ _ Ee o w0 O K - _ w -rxrgaN�'W po "�5� L w >005 _o�w »mow Yea p a o ° z d� z��a&z ° a w wa> 3iis wwiorsJ�? zO a�aa OH=O " p�'J i 0 3 z a _ w w w aQ�oo -c w oz'o�Goko - g'a�5ogo�w VO-°- 05 o"'3aow8`='i W a 8 s g E w_ g g� U Tm B I w a�m858°°Oooww��o3°&&55�LLzzz°oov°ao&°v5 5va=v'RR �aawrro »i3 3 z s° g 3 5 m o wwww-,�,E�z 'zdoa �� °"'�ii��ti�l$®�®®�m#O�w I I I ido zQ ¢ 10' a a 620¢ a a DATE OF SURVEYDRAWN BV Surveyor's Notes: Q01 PL Ti 2021 A.V. ANDSAS DEN WERE N WERVIDED ABSTRACTED OTHERS No "'T"I"N'EAREMET SHOWN!E"""HlsoaawlNc aFE D ERC XAMINATION aF TITLE MADE By SURVIS EYOR. THE THE RECORDED PLAT ANY OTHER EASEMENT( N 1" If1Ch = 2O' ft. COMPLETION DATE: CHECKED BY L SHOWN HEREON E NOT asrRACTEO FOR PER Alrvwc ro THE H REary oEscRleEo LAND I EASEMENTS OR OTHER RECORDED ENCUMBRANCES MUST BE FURNISHED To THE SURVEYOR BY Ti GRAPHIC SCALE O9/24/2021 G.G. NOTSHOWNONTHEPLAT. CLIENT OR THE CLIENTS AGENT PER FLORI1 Group Inc. oEs RaEOERlTFiS Nei AS GE 1°I�,lo o �;« �MINISTRa, ooE E, . OF HE LaRI, PROPERTY AND OWNER INFORMATION ONING, E M 11. ADBITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS < Gando Group Inc. (L68223) Property Address: Parcel l.D.: County/State: scurvoERcao NDNEP°m ONBGOFDO FOOTINGS, PARTIES ISPROHIBITETHWRl OUTWRITTENCONSEI FOUNDATIONS OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WEREINOT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. 5237 SUMMERLIN COMMONS BLVD 1664 VINLAND WAY 54490010449 CoLLier/Florida cr suaauEo ev THEaiENr. Eo FROM wroaMArx SUITE 411 FORT MYERS,FL 33907 NAPLES, FL 34105 BOUNDARY LINESTO BE USED TO RECONSTRUCT 13. FENCE OWNERSHIP NOT BETERMINED. Tel: 833-425-5364 F. 833-425-5363 re..,E,va ... e,...l n..,...n� r, Hea e NOT vau0 wrteoUr rHE swrvaruRE a oRIGIrwL ° e oAccu=R'0F corvraoL suavEY Du n<r<eY«rcryHna As°ry<y or Hne n<r<o°a.:<rleea Pr°P<M w°< HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT LLLP, it's LOT 15, LANDINGS AT BEARS PAW, successors and/or assigns and the Department cording to the plot thereof as recorded in choq sr-ei os a 11 rn , p ��< e.: .� ann of Housing and Urban Development as their Plot Book 56, Page 5, of the Public Records n°rld° °H«. Interests may appear. of COLLIER COUNTY, Florida. Flood Zone Information: Community Nome: Collier County Community No:120067 GUILLERMO A. GUERRERO Pan 0391 Suffi.:H Professionol Surveyor and Mapper Effective Dote:05/16/2012 PSM N. 6453 State of Florida Flood Zone: AE BF.E: 7.0' M r N Packet Pg. 185 3.C.f 1664 VINLAND WAY NAPLEs, FL 34105 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 19, 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLEs, FL 34104 Packet Pg. 186 3.C.f 1664 Vinland Way Submerged Resource Survey July 2021 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed dock and associated residence are located at 1664 Vinland Way and can be further identified by parcel #54490010449. The property is bound to the east and west by single family residences, to the north by Vinland Way, and to the south by the subject man-made canal section of the Gordon River. The property is located at Section 35, Township 49 South, and Range 25 East. The landward portion of the property currently contains a single-family residence which the subject dock will be an accessory structure Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services pertaining to the mangrove removal and proposed docking facility, which requires the completion of a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This report will provide planning and assistance to both the owner(s) and government agencies reviewing the proposed project. The SRS survey was conducted on July 16, 2021. Sea surface conditions consisted of partly cloudy skies, light winds out of the southeast, and an air temperature of 88' F. The tide was at mid -level upon arrival to the site, allowing for observance of most of the bottom lands from the dock. High tide at the project site occurred at 6:06 A.M. (2.4 ft.) and low tide had occurred following our arrival onsite at 11:49 A.M. (1.1 ft.). The water temperature was 830 F. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the submerged resource survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200' of the proposed project. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel conducted a site visit to verify the location of any submerged resources within 200-feet. Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site (or the lack there of), estimated the percent coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Garmin Model 76csx). Packet Pg. 187 3.C.f 1664 Vinland Way Submerged Resource Survey July 2021 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the Submerged Resource Survey to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock and boat -lift installation. The components for this survey included: • Review of aerial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage • Document and photograph all findings The survey area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects, spaced approximately 10-feet apart as shown on the attached exhibit. The existing surrounding docks on the canal provided reference points for easily identifiable land markers such as dock pilings which assisted in maintaining position within each transect. 4.0 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of 1 distinct classification: silt muck with sand and minimal shell debris, which was observed throughout the entire surveyed area. The shoreline consists of rip -rap with numerous other existing single-family docks. The rip -rap and existing dock piles all support a variety of fish as well as sessile and motile invertebrates such as barnacles and mud crabs. Some of the existing dock piles carried historic fragments or remains of oysters, but no live individuals were observed. Algae was observed covering parts of the submerged portions of the piles and rip -rap but was not observed in the underlying substrate. The majority of the project site was devoid of vegetative growth, presumably because of the low water quality and higher levels of freshwater which also reduces penetration of the water column by sunlight. A list of observed species can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1 — Observed fish species Common Name Scientific Name Striped Mullet Mu it ce halus Shee shead 4rchosar us probatocephalus Gray Snapper Luyanus grisens Barnacle Am hibalanus spp. Mud Crab Pano ius herbstii Snook Centropomus undecimalis Packet Pg. 188 3.C.f 1664 Vinland Way Submerged Resource Survey July 2021 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey conducted at the project site yielded few findings at best. Barnacles, mud crabs, and numerous fish species could be seen along the shoreline as well as out on the adjacent dock pilings. Seagrasses were not observed anywhere near the project site. All fish species were observed swimming in and around the shoreline. Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed project. EXISTING DOCK & RIP -RAP SHORELINE I BASED ROCK OF RIP -RAP I Typical Bottom Sediment al Typical Bottom sediment Packet Pg. 189 Ae-r Co►Unty COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colllercountyfl.eov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX; (239) 252-63SB Hybrid Virtual Quasi-judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 202Q-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner For Petition Numbers}: 101-1 M 11A4 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), David W. Gilmour (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name; David W. Gilmour Signature: - lod'-- , 9 Applicant* ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: 1/512022 * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. 3.C.g Packet Pg. 190 3.D 01/27/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.D Item Summary: Petition No. BDE-PL20210000708 - Request for a 12-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width to allow an addition to an existing boat docking facility that will protrude a total of 32 feet into a waterway that is 206f feet wide, pursuant to Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for the benefit of property located at 180 Pago Pago Drive West, also described as Lot 193, Isles of Capri No. 2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commission District 1 Meeting Date: 01/27/2022 Prepared by: Title: Planner — Zoning Name: John Kelly 01/05/2022 5:31 PM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 01/05/2022 5:31 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending Review Item Completed Completed 01/13/2022 4:12 PM Completed 01/18/2022 11:06 AM Completed 01/19/2022 5:08 PM 01/27/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 191 3.D.a Co e-r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FRO GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION - ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: JANUARY 27, 2022 SUBJECT: BDE-PL20210000708, 180 PAGO PAGO DRIVE WEST PROPERTY O ER/APPLICANT: Michael A. and Deborah L. Giovanone 156 Sparrowbush Rd. Latham, NY 12110 REQUESTED ACTION: AGENT: Nick Pearson Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 The petitioner requests a 12-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow an addition to an existing boat dock facility that will protrude a total of 32 feet into a waterway that is 206± feet wide, pursuant to Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for the benefit of the subject property. QM0 APHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 180 Pago Pago Drive West, further described as Lot 193, Isles of Capri No. 2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is located within a Residential -Single Family — 4 (RSF-4) zoning district and supports a single-family dwelling that is adjacent to Marlin Bay. The scope of this project is limited to the expansion of an existing dock, see Attachment C, that will not impact upon an existing boathouse that was constructed in 1970; any alteration to the boathouse would negate its current legal nonconforming status. Said expansion will extend the actual dock waterward an additional 12 feet to create a slip that is deep enough to accommodate a new 29-foot vessel. BDE-PL20210000708 — 180 Pago Pago Dr W Page] of 8 December 21, 2021 Packet Pg. 192 ( Q euoueA q §- MJQ o6e d oBed o@�] (]8 BO Do00LZ Z d:tIL 60Z LZOZ�Z L :podON mS ]uemt4,e■� V $ f � ƒ t $ ¢ ƒ ƒ « ? \ g 0 2 % §k 2 � Lu OAS 4011lo3 � � k �9RL, Q s 110 a ■ � � z � o ■ © © J CL Ca 2 � � .� O N CL Cu � � 0 4-1 CO U 0 —i CO C3 � � � CD CD _ C%4 CD C%4 —i IL � � E =3 z E 0 � @ IL BDEPL2010078-180PgPgDrW December 21,20 1 Page 208 3.D.a SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Pago Pago Drive West (Right -of -Way) then a single-family dwelling located within a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district East: Single-family dwelling, Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district South: Marlin Bay, Rural -Agricultural zoning district with a Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST) West: Single-family dwelling, Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district Aerial — Collier County GIS BDE-PL20210000708 — 180 Pago Pago Dr W Page 3 of 8 December 21, 2021 Packet Pg. 194 3.D.a Aerial — Collier County GIS ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property is located adjacent to an ST overlay zone (Johnson Bay), which will require an ST-permit for the proposed docking facilities prior to issuance of the building permits. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing sea walled shoreline. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility. Exhibit sheet 6 of 8 provides an aerial with a note stating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. BDE-PL20210000708 — 180 Pago Pago Dr W Page 4 of 8 December 21, 2021 Packet Pg. 195 3.D.a STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The subject property is located within an RSF-4 zoning district and supports a single-family dwelling for which the LDC allows two boat slips. The proposed project consists of expanding the existing facility to accommodate a longer vessel. No additional vessels will be moored at this facility. One lift will be used for a 29-foot vessel and the second, existing lift, will remain as -is for a personal watercraft. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion not met. The applicant's agent states that there is ample water depth for the mooring of the 29-foot vessel; however, to accommodate a shore parallel design the existing docking facility would need to be demolished, the applicant prefers to expand on the existing facility which requires additional protrusion into the waterway. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility does not protrude into any marked or charted navigable channel and will not impede any vessel traffic. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) BDE-PL20210000708 — 180 Pago Pago Dr W Page 5 of 8 December 21, 2021 Packet Pg. 196 3.D.a Criterion met. The approximate waterway width is 206 feet. The requested total dock protrusion is 32-feet which is less than 15% of the width of the waterway; therefore, more than 50 percent of the waterway is open for navigation. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The new dock facility will satisfy side setback requirements and is consistent with neighboring docks along the subject shoreline. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent argues that the special condition is that there is already an existing dock facility at this location and that it is their desire to add onto the existing facility rather than to be forced to demolish what is a perfectly find dock facility were it not for its inability to accommodate a 29-foot vessel. Their agent states: "the property owner would incur substantially more cost by demolishing the existing boathouse and constructing an entirely new structure than by just adding a small expansion to the existing structure to accommodate his new boat." Staff concurs. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The amount of decking provided in the proposed project is no more than is provided in similar projects of the area. Furthermore, the proposed dock expansion has been reduced from the original submittal of 294 prOposed square feet to 190 square feet by eliminating expansion of the boathouse roof from the project. The additional 190 square feet of decking is proposed for floor space that will provide access to the applicant's new vessel, storage of marine related items, and for access to the waterways for marine related recreational activities. This will bring the total overwater structure to 886 square feet. If the property owner were to construct a dock that spanned from setback to setback and protruded the maximum of 20' into the waterway (thereby avoiding the need for a variance), the total overwater structure would amount to 800 square feet. This petition would only increase upon that number by 86 square feet. Furthermore, the added decking will have no adverse impacts to the environment, navigation, or views of neighbors, which would all seem to be the reasons for the `excessive decking' criteria. Our opinion is therefore that there is no reason that the applicant BDE-PL20210000708 — 180 Pago Pago Dr W December 21, 2021 Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 197 3.D.a shouldn't be allowed such a modest increase in decking and that the amount of decking proposed is not excessive. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied." Staff concurs. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The proposed dock facility has been designed to moor a 29-foot vessel and a 12-foot personal watercraft, the combined total being 41 feet. The total shoreline at this location is 70 feet; therefore, the vessels will exceed 50 percent. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The subject dock facility is located entirely within the required side setbacks; as designed, no new impacts to neighboring property views of the waterway will result. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200-feet of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. Criterion not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the sea walled basin of Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands. Staff analysis finds this request complies with four of the five of the primary criteria. With respect to the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable, the request meets four of the remaining five secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her BDE-PL20210000708 — 180 Pago Pago Dr W Page 7 of 8 December 21, 2021 Packet Pg. 198 3.D.a own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BDE-PL20210000708, to allow for the construction of the proposed dock facility as depicted within the plans contained in Attachment A. Attachments: A) Proposed Site and Dock Plans B) Public Hearing Sign Posting C) Existing Dock Facility, Permit File PRBD20190103811 D) Applicant's Backup E) HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver BDE-PL20210000708 — 180 Pago Pago Dr W December 21, 2021 Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 199 06ed 06ed 08L 308 80L000UZOZ-1d tiL60Z) sueld Moop pue ej!s posodo.ad - d;uauayoe11v :juewt43ejjd o 0 N a W U) 0 a ZWo � m M o U M z U LU U) 3 ¢ z w rA 0 J LL li 0 j`U 1 LQ Irn V/ r D 0 U W J 0 U U J Z O F� LU W 2�LU - o U OZ) �a Z O a� O U Z D H � Z O W a� o� LL 0 L� W W W LO 04 M C) op co op co (n W LO N 00 OO Z ? Z J LL Za � Q0 W Vj 0 CGOJ d C)LU pD Z a z o W 0 W F- ¢O SOD FZ:a 0 cry zv v� P:\1864.00-Giwwooe-180 Pago Pago\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 10/14/2021 need oBed oa�]Q 8 SOLOOOO�ZOZ d:tIL 6 Z sumd )iooa pue a■S p s do d.¥} emL43Bn¥:l aw�De, n¥ C*4 w .. 2 § ƒ § yj[m2; , % (\ji : : 'Al 5 [\:§ )}2 ( 5 _ � ƒ . ) )( z z W06_o \§ . a / ƒ 0 (6Q..k ®\ozo�zkw0k± e / w§ L l §/e0 ! :: , n«_ \ §y! >/ " / 2 �$2!!a)[|2!2 � / ƒ ƒ / K��`� < a z, 1-104 e Idaw .|A , / | | ■ � 110, k ' . � , ■ w +none ,r _ _\CA _mT-COUN m ic'; 06ed 06ed M 308 80L000M OZ-1d : tIL60Z) sueId voa pue a;is pasodoad - V tuauay3BI)V :tueWLj3etIV N 0 N N Ww 0 < 1" 1a tv a Q t�� 7 a Q � W Q J Z Zw-1O QU am XO W 0 Q� Q� ,z U W 0 LL � .. w000 �U) Z �— 11.2' -�i � O U) c� Y Z U W .6Z ow ~ M .Z£ J X Z OER Q as a Q0� 11.2' OU)z w Z_ O—F O J D a } Q z F— O > O Q� - w Q Y a a U a a U �m a 0 o O U� LU � �d @aad @aaad�dd� �M11fi=lvQIJFJfiY&19G4,�d 9d0'a HRQPQttffD AERIAL 1 06ed 06ed M 308 80L00006ZOZ-1d : tIL60Z) sueId voa pue a;is pasodoad - V tuauay3BI)V :tuauay3L'UV z 0 H U W N U a di J ci N M O N a a N _d I N Z 0 F 80 I� 0 06ed o6ed OSL 308 80L000UZOZ-1d : tiL60Z) sueld Moop pue el!s posodoad - d IUGWLIoePV :IU8WLIoe;I ED o u w I~i\\�\ N LL O Q— m 0 J PP5 \ 0 C') co 2 J d 2 i U) EL IL J � m W % Q Q m \ z o o z O w m O QZ w O o w U W o ❑ o ow U) I.IJ z 0 m m Z o- W C_ a N )0 U 3 U y a u u uCD o on V M O U N w /\ P:\1864.00-Giovanone-180 Paao Pago\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE.dwo CROSS SECTION BB 10/14/2021 F06ed o6ed 08 � 308 80L000MUZ�d : tIL60Z) sueld voa pue a;is pasodoad - V tuauay3eI)v :}uGWLj3 jv am -,- IIF,„ n I I I I Lo 0 N 6 a. a N d I z 0 L6o L-i ,w U w N F z 0 0 0 } w Qcr?O wmo..g F J. Q IL 0 O m y �arcpi W U N N z 0 0- y. W.00Z --{,0� Z z C/) > U I I LL ' w � w co I I I N • I I ' I ' � •� C � I . -t;5 C� U M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V C� a iG cn o M � U N N iL W inone-180 Paao Pa4o\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE.dwo $W$AAEMED RESOURCE SURVEY 10/14/2021 06ed 06ed M 308 80L000MUZ-1d tIL60Z) sueld voa pue a;is pasodoad - V tuauay3ejjv :tuewLj3et}d Li 'Wov vi f s. Fq r ti � tj 1 ry wwo m0D 1 ry r•1 ,6 b Jim I )' W Z /m L' bra U rn � CD J N Q' D Qzoz O GNU LLJ Qp0-w LL Q Q ,ZE 'ZZ O 0 N M a ° o Z wmo..g o U m x N NO W rf • Y Zcl Z. W LU XQ'yM� U bq cv N 2_ �j o lO LL J Cl:3 U M N 4 . tea,. Q W W cn °' a s Q W o Z E o .� � = —� 4 1-1 C,w ;. 0g = 0 U) 0-1 c LL x OZ (n Q M O Z W W W Q HWD O=Z T. DOCKS 1 �M 06ed 06ed M 308 80L00006ZOZ-1d VL60Z) sueld voa pue a;is pasodoad - V luauay3ejjV :juewLj3eIV n CL Y t V L 7 N r � s 0 i r o h m z ¢ o o Z 0 w Z U � N r l� w 16 Q LU Jr 0-z wO O f✓ ' O m , _ ^ U XM N 14 O -. W C) z .,. s o It AlU r " c� w , J, ��RR(--• O ♦ r t � w 3.D.c KellyJohn From: KellyJohn Sent: Friday, January 07, 2022 4:41 PM To: KellyJohn Subject: BDE-PL20210000708 - 180 Pago Pago Dr W - Public Hearing Sign HEX 1-27-2022 Attachments: 6F679702-4336-4B1A-AF19-2EAD93FA6DO7jpeg; 28FE6CB7-6D62-4520-AF27-CC55B3150CDAjpeg; 0113A64F-4FCB-4FB6-B931-420C7815A8A7jpeg; 617CB98A-B725-40CF-8A71-2509OE168305jpeg; FF295C8F-CB52-4103-A763-B4DF29ED4E7Djpeg; C85B418A-8OB1-4B94-AOA6-94013025F302jpeg A Notice of Public Hearing Sign was posted by me to the front of the referenced address, at approximately 12:30 PM this date, as evidenced by the attached photographs. Respectfully John Yeffy Senior Planner Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.5719 Fax: 239.252.6363 Email: John.Kelly@colliercountvfl.aov TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZonin Co l `er Count Growth Management Department Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 208 IC H FOR 180 Pago Page Drive West BOAT DOCK FYTFIuclnhl - 1-- 09 Packet Pg. 2 3.D.c 3.D.d COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the county regulating building construction or use. For the following: PERMIT NBR: PRBD2019010381101 CO NBR: CO TYPE: COMP STATUS: Finaled ISSUED DATE: July 03, 2019 ADDRESS: 180 Pago Pago DR W, Naples SUBDIVISION: LOT: BLOCK: T.R.S.: SLUC CODE: UTILITY COMPANY: JOB DESC: Build a new dock section on each side of existing boat house. Install platform lift on the east side 180 PAGO PAGO DR W NUMBER OF METERS: OWNER: GIOVANONE, MICHAEL A DEBORAH L GIOVANONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ISLES OF CAPRI NO 2 LOT 193 Note: A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed, or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Packet Pg. 212 3.D.d COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PR-BD2019010381101 PERMIT TYPE: MR ISSUED: BY: APPLIED DATE: 01-28-19 MASTER #: COA: JOB ADDRESS: 180 Pago Pago DR W, Naples JOB DESCRIPTION: Build a new dock section on each side of existing boat JOB PHONE: house. Install platform lift on the east side. 180 PAGO PAGO DR W SUBDIVISION #: FLOOD MAP: FOLIO #: 52392360008 OWNER INFORMATION: GIOVANONE, MICHAEL A DEBORAH L GIOVANONE 156 SPARROWBUSH RD LATHAM, NY 12110 FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: JOB VALUE: $26,000.00 SETBACKS FRONT: SEWER: CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE: BLOCK: ZONE: ELEVATION: SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE: 32-51-26 APPROVAL DATE: 03-07-19 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: IMPERIAL MARINE CONSTRUCTION INC 560 Southwest Blvd. NAPLES, FL 34113 CERTIFICATE #:: C36468 PHONE: 0220 TOTAL RES SOFT: 0 TOTAL COMM SOFT: 0 REAR: 20 protrusion LEFT: 15 WATER: LOT: RIGHT: 15 Per Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-01, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any addition, stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OI THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENT' TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Packet Pg. 213 cal 3.D.d Revi?wed tar Cade Campli?nce Pit80XUtBCtUs911 01�czfz_'o r ' SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS: Constrict two fixed docks; the western dock will act as a fishing pier while the eastern dock will access a boat lift for a CraigCat. Docks will include LV lighting and boat lift electric as per plans provided by Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA). Both docks should be constructed with a protrusion of 20 feet from the property line, this dimension should be confirmed during the pre -construction layout survey. The proposed dock is at a single family property located at 180 Pago Pago Drive W on Isles of Capri. The site includes an existing two level boat house that cannot be touched or connected to the proposed structures. There will be limited staging and parking at the site, all work should be done by barge. I c,To, 2-52„y7 I c. k. S " i oiY't� s t c n ; Zp< Ex s+i r3 bco-+ b 00 S e W+ I I n C+ b&. 4tu4-h e_4 Packet Pg. 214 OOL 3a8 80L000OLZOZ-ld : VL60Z) LLOCO L06LOZOEINd;!WJGd `31000 6u!;s!x3 - 0 }uauay0ejjv :;uewLj3e;;d N O ` N//\O I VVPIJ unlns�oj {euewuwu,W-11a{Y c9 � ,{ 531d,os5r'$„�� p_ wnnr rwa N d r+ d Y t� R d w } ® U- O D 0 H L �.:._. 0 1. N O I� qA m z� �XF Q Z W U L co rn W Z 0 o 7 j N O ❑ �2 U V !_ U o -,o, FZ Aar oiI O Q0 W �Z W J J O W v v rF "I v v I� 0 z LLLI w Z 1 Q 0 U Z 0 w 0U W ~ v Ln iO N n >. > w Z a z a ) 'O O d. s x v ° 0 W W o 3z~`m Ol fv Ln 0 ru O I,: � •�n �� C) N c3 9 W o d m *a�a ', 3oazo �.. ��.. ............'Y LL x W W �O ti N LL . O� ......... OF .� Q K 0 M OOL 3a8 80L000OLZOZ-ld : VL60Z) L LOCO L06LOZOEINd }!WJGd I31000 6u!;s!X3 - :D IUgWLj3BPV :;uawy3e;;d eoo® • - • e �>rL wee t o000 Y 1. U W w c m ¢ t LLl z z I W t W I 0 J I z a W a < Ve 7 I J +{ LU z aN In ooa z nN w �_ mFN w �¢ j0� Q U K -LL O -U) w 3wLqo Q OLLz'W,w O ULOWn > UP UK¢ FPRU-d 0 m ¢Om_ LL fn¢ZY W Y 4%- O W cmo0 U 0U)zOF-in0 QC, a0�n oo= W N¢,yJOLL m Fin Q2 W pox. XO =o<Ymo W-,>p a°0°�z7K� U LLJ2i�XNU F,m W Utl)m Q=�m¢d.O fA of DN OOaOw C�¢ j _to_ Tam 0o'. -YOF z iMW.O -2 z; wwwzzww w w m z? V mF¢ N.U-aa wyO v r�aFpimOzURv vJO '/W aRUJUv KQ¢KraWTWAWAAACnoamna z v v v v v v v v v v v v v �atv- } m O W W J W QO F z zQ w w� F w Q� F3 w J o a Q w 3 w Lu mo �UW QK 1 ��\�� wmm a0 O J d a� P a00- ¢LLB W W Z Z 0_ U W -2 Z Y u' Q O H > x Q U a �O "cn � OF G'm Jw YLL d< I�s 12'-io• ❑ /� W w w �\��a c = w o o I \; o w _ (Lu o a I O Fm fw w \ a0 O z D In / w O w O LLI '4p� x a- z I pl j� w O n w LL ° / alGLL oa z z �� na¢ o z .OZ 3I 3 �J t R � O Z w - U) J_ ba-� z w0 ui 0 z W w 2w z LL F 0_ (D U z w w w w z w < �- z �- < z F-t�f z 4 W W ¢ J QCL -� h - �� X¢ X0- ¢m Q w ¢ Q In on 3a8 80L00006ZOZ-ld VL60Z) MCOL0660ZaBUd WUJOd `mood 6unsix3 - 3 }uewt43ejjv :4ugwLj3e;}d ti N O N d/�O I gml�DOSSYV �$� W �98 L. N 'JA➢'S3iV7JOSSV $'I'IYH "ITdUNL1L WMr rwa d rr d 0(01 cc WE V I o w Z m I —I a W Q a > Q Q J f- Z Q > U Uw Z s0 J W m m a O io io a r X z F. X=¢I X0 N N Q W LL fVK N� a �j (J9F C O Z ZO Q U L F 0 Z Y 3Q W uj X a N j om o Y0 mw w0 y y wa wOa moN UOW a�- QOy Lazes r � vm ¢aid 00 �WQ lw o Fm w w C7 . 0 Z CL J � U I- U UO z Q O Q z U w J_ d �Iw of a Of - =_Z W W w =a Q W - U f- O Y 0�K om w J tq w 1 m Vw cn0 ih o6oD�� co�tSx� Q z W f u! co Z is W j M H W W Xa w ¢~. N -z a z LL FO z d Z 2 "� J 2 CQi z J mp (VV ��X W !~ W 3 =O^ W v o y IQ- mxOwW O� w U J J W OwU w m X = w �¢ W Q p Z v�wW�> mH r- 0 w w x C9 Uw U C9 J UOm �o F h �U2 aO0 W U LO O J U 04 �3�Q Q (n _ v U fnO W Zm w n. O o rn�= m Q J Y O X o-z o oz C9 z W I- z (L U a. K Z Q LJ O O WO Wd A ZUJ� em S XQ JJW LLJQ QQ w= aF-QJ �m z V V Z V fn V M rn I Q w >O 3 �m Of ui U) w o ai M X zy m W m K y m F w- 0 U NX wU gU w a m J a W F U) 0 U) aa J o a U X Z 0 z m a o 0 zO W - Z w J F N O Z z1¢¢wcYi FW CD ow-zm .x z AQ�Q �3x r W W ■0- W U J Ow JO d F ■ Oz J w zj❑W W(9 Zo�Zl Z Qm�x Z Q-w Lw 00 1 ,w7z v m3" u1 D � N = m � 0 J w ZQ m Y wp Z O J N m mUQ Nw0 =a 3 w c9 Of F- C, W W 19 2002 U Z HN J a Z UNO 2ti wm owzz mco =�¢ caw K h = F Q 2 Y Q two U Z N m Q, ~=p LL O ca Nugw tgwU fC= mF V 3w w r rn w� .� -zZZ wo N Z 1010 KmN w-, Z Z m Q a < W o OUP w . , 0 ONr Q w KU OOL 3a8 80L000OLZOZ-ld : VL60Z) LLOCO L06LOZOEINd;!WJGd `31000 6ul;slx3 - :D }uauay0ejjv :;uewLj3e;;d I � �� N O Nd'/�O I JJ 5u!grouo�lmuamumimggauuelp 'JKI'SUVDOSSY V 9"IVII'll1.11 Sd„ WMf f WZI � cL VE la'Sgl IVN'3ARIO OQVd OQVd 09L a 2 1 Li {�y WA. Q J � K I _ N ❑cr ww z n. O Fa 0� ma O} w Z Z Z JO U W W W n- o Od d U Q w w F Z J Xz O W w aQ ¢ z a_ a� oaw �a �Qm o w o_aw a ¢ co Z_ (DY ao i �❑ m Z z 0 P: a U U) Fo a U� �a W J w ❑ U dim om 0 � O I o D� z U J ❑ F- Z Z ❑ a�J w Q Y Xa-L) W 0 � m a w a w a C/) (� J z J F I w W cn 6 w w m U U H m � O !) m = ❑ C7 U LLJ zU F-Oa z0 w ? d Y U W Y U O w J ❑ W W m O ww ZZ O W � Z w W F H X W ' W J w a Z J z W a � a O U' ❑ J ++ 3.D.d Coder county Growth Management Department Development Review Division March 04, 2019 GIOVANONE, MICHAEL A DEBORAH L GIOVANONE 156 SPARROWBUSH RD LATHAM, NY 12110 RE: Special Treatment Permit No. PL20190000386 Property ID # 52392360008 Dear Applicant: Your request for a special treatment (ST) development permit for the above referenced property has been administratively approved pursuant to section 4.02.14 and 2.03.07.D of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The attached site plan identifies site alterations authorized by this permit. The following stipulations shall apply: • Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO) all exotic vegetation, as defined in Division 1.08.02 LDC, shall be removed from the property. • Permits or letters of exemption from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers shall be presented prior to issuance of a County building permit. • Petitioner shall utilize only native southern Floridian species for all on -site landscaping. • Outdoor lighting associated with construction or development within three hundred (300) feet of the high tide line shall be in compliance with Division 3.04.02.B. of the Collier County Land Development Code. • All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. • Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at Phone: (239)-252-2915 or Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyf.gov. Sincerely, Dew,&A nest Rev&& Dcac� Growth Management Department Permit Issuance 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. PL201...... as ...„ aia.zo,s . Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2400 cc. Florida Department of Economic Opportunity - ACSC-DO@DEO.myflorida.com Packet Pg. 219 3.D.d a o 0 v >LL55�U tea° '� O �❑ Z11 �p�'w W=y, a rn Q F- O wp Wulp§;�sr Q � N ai 2 Z N m H 121 OU UW) rn U C v Z CC' W Q LL W KV ?¢LLWF QnSi .e er �p O N O OLL! Z W=,NB O N J J Q OQ � u_� wZ a¢ zsa o B� m V c. a z � U D W ❑� a g'0' 1 d7 'q ; N C °' ■ d v o w ❑2 > W(n gNpUC zm�g.e p N ?Faf0 m of 'z z w�z7 z-H� g C� O o ~� �, �W0-LLJ ❑ Q0 0<7:: a O m o ❑ M d' �M m yip Oy�Qi Cw❑Qw O wU ¢3�mwo �v. d W Q m ■ y0a i'Y�WQ�n�� C7 Ix UWu, -a.o Lu > Zo � cc C. C� 0V 0c,) z Q aZ LL>wx,--0, -c Df o o d O W UY�� a Cn� �j�m >jr~a u O } p �al 0 D YO-,U 0 }� U0t:X IF-zm = W o❑ W U) (n m c ami o cmi 0 ❑ J m0maW ¢ jJ ==�¢ r-o=,' X N -' > > 0_ � �� a r❑ E ti U) W ¢Fww as Ya !- roOmQaz O N � i z ro 0 o^ 2 J U)� H O IRR d n m<O-i ❑=U W Ww.Fp O O F OLL V,O (h m NCW aO �O_ I ONo 00 zQW 00 R m �oW� PL,~ 00O¢�oQ Q Cl)Cl)mN UUZ�NNF-W ❑ ❑ ❑ -❑C.g IJL.'0W Y ❑ W F- m ❑W W w? Ww �r z o Z aW w z V O a m m W ww z¢w a O aJy m Oa Wm Cc) ¢ Kavi a chi > u �� W F- u� Ow U I" ¢ ❑ OW z H�I z W } pan �^# 3 WK �W�ll2�ll=)7 N? ZO>O~ M. � 0.E% RW =QQ la wOWO K IO=WW>p] UW O O ¢ WU KF-�Wj w 00 55W> N Zy Q �4J Sj7¢O �ZmUF ❑uj WO Z2z WZ'I1"m ��- N?p 7mWKK Ww Owl ❑� W ILL O > ZU zW(Z9, HWL) W JO a 1-mOaU O 71¢iLL jai OW OZ Z_ W¢WOmm >lyO� WW(11 # m> 7 aW WzK ❑�II UO7 j❑ ❑Kf-7 m ❑m ¢U :3'W 0 F-4� OFW } �U oN mr- 0,a��zW�wx w O¢¢? Nw Uvm uZLL O Z� z Z a Z� WLI�I o Z. <� = O p55 '<W0WZ F2 o w 0 $ � Z F ❑ u mOw Oa "A' z a ImiO wN oa Wo �w w� �¢Zi w� � W=yF� Wrp �i� �zz ��~�W� ¢ ai z m z w I¢-az c001- W 2 W a�Nz 7 7` 7O 00 w �OQz Q� �ZD m >KKZOa zLLxx7W mY wOaO �7 m0� W ¢F_ OOwm >O ¢00 NOW F<-'. 7F ~O¢ mZm¢� z J a zow w N a W O O¢ U I-�Wr~q F m Y O 111-WW ZLLYW a'fn pQU } OOrOn F=-�yOy fx >�wZo K� Na y00J K�N��m O ❑ m W Y QNKYm W W qm 1, O mIZLLQ OOQm 2F z�K>m¢OW WF-WdU'¢w ZZ wfflFFO--O F4l �LLW o¢aw=a ZKZWO �ZJI...HUOU W W"'�❑�W7tyt11 O U ZZZm� tq�~Z OWO r7n ¢�OOma ZtnZz7 Om p- ww- 2g OUw ¢ W O Cc,wQWJ K O V Z Y Y caWao z¢ Mom¢ w wm¢m(x �wWoF- w0 m¢3¢ Kzm aoHo 02K cN X z z?i'WFU-I2l agora wood z `v z U z a waa UCw7, I„U ~ w fZmm �WZ� W¢ rOq Ory LL �waKN� t¢i�OWU 00 IgimwoJ KW !a-'O WdWly--wp a s yoga W KO ❑grit w ma¢aWw woWilLL. >K F ur�x0 LLz ❑7F' H rnx nw FS m ¢p¢ wcl n aQ 'wi¢o E'WW��QW j WY mUw Om=W w W> w m m w m a mra�oaLLav n n n n u n u .p m- n n n n O f=-•Z mil lUi �m On O -00W LL r7/l0<KQ WWQ� z¢O �U 73 Z0>-<("0W •LLRRma-aU dUJWm7 DO■O`r' �O 0,.,�""`.� ti❑�a Z . ci¢ rnmm v viZZO:¢¢O O Ioz NOS n❑Zw mo a?o =mw�zw PRBD20190103811 ae Le Y Z SURVEY NAS BEEN REVIE\'/EU BY ZONII.G WRCWIVILVKE &Oie--r county additional review notes: DIGITAL SURVEY REC'D, APPROVED, SETBACKS OK, DOCK, DIGITAL SIGNATURE VALIDATED ChurchWilliam 07/03/2019 8:57 AM 519ooE 0 30. Is �O. 0 O `moo o !Q O'e O(� CA\ H O J S 1 PIS •(G = W �coxJ Z�)Q<O W WO� WJzo02 O ZZ �g ^_ Y 0 0d J ram LLa 0' w _o * c3�o n0LL LLZO U 'A's ;p Pl W Q � U J LL a o W ❑ 11 U W❑W Q laL 3pJ ^ O �. (O I I w IaL a OU LL so Z') O zo N °� N Packet Pg. 220 1 I 3.D.e I MICHAEL GIOVANONE DOCK 180 PAGO PAGO DR. W NAPLES, FL 34113 BDE APPLICATION PL20210000708 Ju 2021 PREPARED BY: TuRRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE:239-643-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM Packet Pg. 221 HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A— Z.:�z4 %a& /?o —35�—io d"-40 k/ A. Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE o DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN "BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT." Planner responsible for providing the County Attorne -drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup c r_ materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT — STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY o WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] 0 a� a B. Backup provided by Applicant: 0, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY o DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE 0 w BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY -MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE m APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES -THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. o ti 0 0 , z Application, to include but not limited to the following: c ✓ Narrative of request c �C Property Information N a ✓ Property Ownership Disclosure Form J -Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat N dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. a Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from U disclosure form) m Affidavit of Unified Control Y) c U ✓ Affidavit of .Q Drawings (may include Cross -Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with a Q Water depth, location maps etc.) a� NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) E ✓ Inciude 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio t U r a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Environmental Data a� E Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver U r Utility Letter a Deviation Justifications Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff InfonnationVob Aides or Help Guides Packet Pg. 222 3.D.e ✓Boundary Survey _✓Other documents, as needed, on a case -by -case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. ✓ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. ✓ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents /E Tcao Lys o , X �� I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent's/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 12/9/2021 Signature of Agent Representative Nick Pearson Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Date Revised5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Ser-Aces\Current\Zoning Staff lnformationuob Aides or Help Guides Packet Pg. 223 I 3.D.e I BDE Application Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL COIL 00 W 0 Ca CO O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 224 CUffIeY County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): ❑■ DOCK EXTENSION ❑■ BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed bystoff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATIOI\ Name of Property Owner(s): Michael and Deborah Giovanone Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 156 Sparrowbush Rd. Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: mrpools1 @aol.com Name of Agent(s): Nick Pearson Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Address: 3584 Exchange Ave Telephone: (239) 643-0166 Cell: E-Mail Address: Nick@THAnaples.com City: Latham State: NY City Fax: Naples State: FL PROPERTY LOCATION Fax: Section/Township/Range: 32 / 51 S / 26 E property I.D. Number Subdivision: 426700 - ISLES OF CAPRI UNIT 2 Unit: 2 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 180 PAGO PAGO DR W Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RSF-4; current use is private residential May 8, 2018 ZIP: 12110 ZIP: 34104 52392360008 Lot: 193 Block: Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 225 3.D.e CUffIBY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N RSF-4 Private Residential S A-ST N/A - public waterway E RSF-4 Private Residential W RSF-4 Private Residential DESCRIPTION OF °ROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): See attached Description of project page. SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 206 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑■ visual estimate ❑■ other (specify) G'S=°f-, 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 70 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 15 ft. Required: 15 _ ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 32 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 29 ft. 2. 12 ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: neighboring docks throughout the bay all have approved BDEs for more protrusion than 30', many of which consist of covered structures similar to that which is proposed. See exhibit 7. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.18 Acres May 8, 2018 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 226 Coder Count y 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes X No If yes, please provide copies. PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) May 8, 2018 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 227 3.D.e Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 1 must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) May 8, 2018 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 228 3.D.e Co*rr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 S. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Establishment Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 2 ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey Er ❑ Chart of Site Waterway ❑ [� Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 [✓]� ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 [� ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: 6/26/2020 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 229 Co*;r County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Other: ElEmergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Other: FEE RE IREMENTS: oat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 pa . Pre -Application Meeting, if required: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees; a new pre - application meeting may be required.) ;"Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑ An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive s A Naples, FL 34104 Signature of Petitioner or Agent 6/26/2020 6/8/2021 Date Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 230 3.D.e TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Avenue • Naples, Florida 34104-3732 • 239-643-0166 • Fax (239) 643-6632 • tuna@thanaples.com Giovanone Boat Dock Extension (BDE) Petition #PL20210000708 September 15, 2021 Narrative Description of Project Narrative description of project: (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The property at 180 Pago Pago Dr. W, owned by Michael and Deborah Giovanone since 2013, is a conventional 70' x 110' rectangular shaped lot located on Isles of Capri, on the south side of Pago Pago Dr. W. The parcel contains a principal structure that was built in 1970 and which serves as a single-family residence. The parcel also has a 70' seawall shoreline, a docking facility with 2 boatlifts, and a grandfathered legally non- conforming boathouse all within the adjacent man-made bay. The lot is zoned RSF-3, which is intended for development with single-family residences. The dock spans nearly the entire 40' distance from side setback to side setback and protrudes approximately 19' from the face of the seawall or 20.8' from the property line. The boathouse is an approximately 19' x 22' structure which covers a slip in the middle of the dock. The boathouse is specifically nonconforming in that its roof is flat and is not of the same color or material as the principal structure. Total existing overwater square footage by the dock and boathouse amounts to approximately 696 square feet. The facility's 2 boat slips can be found within the boathouse (as previously mentioned), and on the dock's east side. We propose to expand the existing dock facility by extending the dock an additional 11.2' into the waterway to allow for reasonable loading/unloading from the boat, storage of marine related items, and general recreational use of the waterway. The new docking facility with vessels would protrude 32' into the waterway from the most restrictive point (the property line). Therefore, the proposed facility would require a 12' protrusion variance beyond the normally allowed 20' of protrusion. Total over -water structure proposed would amount to approximately 190 square feet of decking, bringing the total overwater structure at the site to 886 square feet. All structures proposed would still be located within the applicant's riparian setbacks and have been designed so as to not affect the ingress or egress from neighboring docks or public navigability in general. There are no seagrasses growing within 200' of the proposed project so environmental impacts by the designed structure are negligible. And the nearby area also already has several docks in existence of similar size and shape. We believe that this BDE would therefore allow the property owner to make reasonable use of the waterway and docking facility for mooring and other water -based recreational activities while also maintaining the ability to safely ingress and egress by any of the applicant's vessels. Packet Pg. 231 I 3.D.e I Primary Criteria Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL CoIL 00 W 0 co co O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 232 3.D.e PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) The subject property is zoned for a single-family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 slips per the Collier County LDC. The proposed project consists of expanding the existing facility to accommodate a longer vessel. No additional vessels will be moored at the proposed facility. One lift will be used for a 29-foot vessel and the second, existing lift will remain as -is for a personal watercraft. This criteria is therefore satisfied. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) The water depths at the site are ample enough for mooring by the proposed vessel. However, mooring in a shore -parallel configuration would require demolition of the existing structure and constructing an entirely new dock (rather than simply expanding upon the existing structure), which the owner is not in favor of doing. This criteria is therefore not met. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) The proposed docking facility is not located within a marked channel, nor will it affect navigation. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width Packet Pg. 233 3.D.e between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) The waterway width at the most restrictive point (for this particular parcel) is approximately 206' in width. The proposed dock protrusion will reach 32 feet from the most restrictive point (the property line), which is less than 15% of the width of waterway. Additionally, the proposed dock will leave substantially more than 50% of the waterway open for navigation. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) The proposed docking facility will meet the required side yard setbacks of 15-feet. Additionally, the proposed dock will not protrude more than any of the surrounding properties in the immediate area. Therefore, the proposed dock will not interfere with any existing or future neighboring docking facilities. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. Packet Pg. 234 I 3.D.e I Secondary Criteria Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL COIL 00 W 0 ca 00 O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 235 3.D.e SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) The property owner would incur substantially more costs by demolishing the existing boathouse and constructing an entirely new structure than by just adding a small expansion to the existing structure to accommodate his new boat. So, for the purposes of being fiscally responsible, the property owner would like to protrude beyond the normally allowed 20' from the MHWL. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The amount of decking provided in the proposed project is no more than is provided in similar projects of the area. Furthermore, the proposed dock expansion has been reduced from the original submittal of 294 proposed square feet to 190 square feet by eliminating expansion of the boathouse roof from the project. The additional 190 square feet of decking is proposed for floor space that will provide access to the applicant's new vessel, storage of marine related items, and for access to the waterways for marine related recreational activities. This will bring the total overwater structure to 886 square feet. If the property owner were to construct a dock that spanned from setback to setback and protruded the maximum of 20' into the waterway (thereby avoiding the need for a variance), the total overwater structure would amount to 800 square feet. This petition would only increase upon that number by 86 square feet. Furthermore, the added decking will have no adverse impacts to the environment, navigation, or views of neighbors, which would all seem to be the reasons for the "excessive decking" criteria. Our opinion is therefore that there is no reason that the applicant shouldn't be allowed such a modest increase in decking and that the amount of decking proposed is not excessive. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) The length of vessels together collectively equal 41' (29' and 12') which is more than 50% of the applicant's total shoreline (83'). This criteria is therefore not met/satisfied. Packet Pg. 236 3.D.e 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) The proposed docking facility is located entirely within the riparian setbacks of the property owner and will not block the views of surrounding properties. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the proposed dock location. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.I I must be demonstrated.) The proposed work is for a single-family dock facility. The Collier County Manatee Protection Plan does not restrict single-family docks, except for those within the sea walled basin of Port of the Islands. This dock is not within Port of the Islands, and so therefore complies with the Manatee Protection Plan. This criteria is therefore met/satisfied. Packet Pg. 237 I 3.D.e I Property Information 2 u 0 0 a� c 0 c c� 0 t9 0 0 0 O 00 W 0 ca 00 O 0 0 O O r N O N J d El w a+ a Packet Pg. 238 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Address 180 PAGO Parcel No 52392360008 *Disclaimer PAGO DR W Site City NAPLES Name / Address IGIOVANONE, MICHAEL A DEBORAH L GIOVANONE 3.D.e Site Zone 31 " 3 *Note 156 SPARROWBUSH RD Y U O C N C City LATHAM State I NY I Zip 12110 O c c� Map No. Strap No. Section Township Ran a Acres *Estimate c 2 61332 42670019361332 32 51 26 0.18 Legal ISLES OF CAPRI NO 2 LOT 193 L c` 0 Millage Area o 91 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 426700 - ISLES OF CAPRI UNIT 2 School Other Total o Use Code O 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.016 6.2924 11.308 a Latest Sales History 2020 Certified Tax Roll 00 Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) w Date Book -Page Amount 10/28/13 4980-3810 $ 425,000 07/27/98 2444-3218 $ 201,900 04/01/69 306-567 $ 0 Land Value $ 308 m D +� Improved Value $ 288 c 9 (_) Market Value $ 596 0 9 (-) Assessed Value $ 596 9 - o _ (_) School Taxable Value $ 596 N 9 o- (_) Taxable Value $ 596 � 9 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Ta a Roll v 0 0 N 7 t) O m N r C M 2 0. O. Q a C O E t C� M r r+ Q a+ C d E t V Q Packet Pg. 239 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Site Address 1180 PAGO Parcel No 52392360008 *n;«in;w",mr Der.n nQ W Site City NAPLES Name / Address I GIOVANONE. MICHAEL A Permits (Provided for reference ourooses only. *Full Disclaimer.) 3.D.e Site Zone 31 " 3 *Note Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 0 COUNTY PRBD20191042881 ROOF 1970 COUNTY 69-2046 1970 COUNTY 69-745 2003 COUNTY 0207-0772 01/10/03 ADDITION 2003 COUNTY 0210-1322 01/10/03 ROOF 2016 COUNTY PRBD20131129531 01/22/15 2016 COUNTY PRBD20150102363 02/23/15 SCREEN ENCLOSURE 2016 COUNTY PRBD20150412908 01/29/16 DOCK 2020 COUNTY PRBD20190103811 07/03/19 05/16/19 DOCK 2020 COUNTY PRBD20191146612 02/19/20 Land # Calc Code Units 10 1 RESIDENTIAL FF 70 Buildina/Extra Features # Year Built Description Area Ar 10 1970 RESIDENTIAL 1966 22 20 1970 BOAT HOUSE 320 3' 30 1970 PVC D 354 3! 40 2015 PCDECK 320 3' 50 2015 ALUM SCREEN PORCH 336 1 60 2015 TILE DECK 155 1! 70 2015 SEAWALL 70 7 Packet Pg. 240 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site Address 180 PAGO arcel No 52392360008 *Disclaimer ,PAGO DR W Site City NAPLES Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 3.D.e Site Zone 31 " 3 *Note Packet Pg. 241 Collier County Property Appraiser PVC a 88.0 sf w 16 20I ABH 320.0 s PCDECK 320.0 sf (ABOVE) TILE 60.0 sf 5 12 PVC c� 266.0 r 14 28 ALSP 336.0 sf 40 1 + 1 0 1966.0 sf 12 0 2 1 TILE 95.0 sf 5712 14 12 12 75 m 58 3�—...I °0 9 - L OP 30 14 (B=147.0 sf) 44.1 sf 00 0 �' 22 < Q 0000 m m ca Q 0 E a Packet Pg. 242 I 3.D.e I Property Ownership Disclosure Form Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL CoIL 00 W 0 Ca 00 O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 243 3.D.e Cottier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: 7 Name and Address % of Ownership Michael & Deborah Giovanone 100 180 Pago Pago Dr. W, Naples FL 34113 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 244 Cottier County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f f. Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 'I I IL.CI J, a L U L.RI IUIUIn J, UCI ICI luau ICJ, UI f CII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers. if a corporation. partnership. or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Name and Address 10/28/2013 years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 245 Coi�ier County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Nick Pearson Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 6/8/2021 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 246 I 3.D.e I Property Deed Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL COIL 00 W 0 ca 00 O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 247 INSTR 4909740 OR 4980 PG 3810 RECORDED 11/5/2013 10:21 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $2,975.00 REC $18.50 CONS $4259000.00 3.D.e Prepared by Cheri Bowen, an employee of Island Title 5 Star Agency, LLC 1118 N. Collier Blvd. Marco Island, FL 34145 (239)394-4888 Return to: Island Title 5 StavAgency, LLC File No.: 3832- WARRANTY DEED This indenture made on October 28 2013A.D., by .. " Louise Lemon, an unremarri•e idow and surviving spouse of John Lemon, deceased whose address is: 231 10th AvenuNW Naples, FL 34120 hereinafter called the "grantor", to Michael A. Giovanone and Deborah L,`Gi+6vanone, husband and wife whose address is: 5 Campion Lane, Saratog S 'rungs, NY 12866 hereinafter called the "grantee": (Which terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include singular or ply (corporation or individual, and either sex, and shall include heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the same) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideratii valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acl remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the gra Florida, to -wit: Lot 193 of ISLES OF CAPRI NO. 2, according to the Plat t Page 46, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 52392360008 m of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other ;._.hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, ittertain land situate in Collier County, i6f as recorded in Plat Book 3, Subject to all reservations, covenants, conditions, restrictions and easemen6f record and to all applicable zoning ordinances and/or restrictions imposed by governmental autlhortie,,if any. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belongin gjorr in any way appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31st of 2012. Page 1 of 2 3832 - 136453 Packet Pg. 248 *** OR 4980 PG 3811 *** 3.D.e In Witness Whereof, the grantor has hereunto set their hand(s) and seal(s) the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delllvCered lln' ur presence: Witness S�ture Print Name: State of FL County of Collier The Foregoing Instrument Was Acknowledge Lemon, an unremarried widow and surviving personally known to me or who has/have producec Notary Public (Printed Name) My Commission expires: /U// �5 Print Name: ZAP) I (- i--i '( /h oiT i i1 f� re me on October -,22�b013 , by Louise ie of John Lemon, deceased who is/are '-driver's license as identification. CHERYL A. BOWEN MY COMMISSION # EE 000252 EXPIRES: October 13, 2014 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwrllers Page 2 of 2 3832 - 136453 Packet Pg. 249 I 3.D.e I Pre -Application Meeting Notes Packet Pg. 250 Co er County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: BDE DateandTime: Thursday 4/8/2021 3:00 PM Assigned Planner: John Kelly Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 180 Pago Pago Dr.-Giovanone (BDE) PL#: 20210000708 PropertylD#: 52392360008 Current Zoning: RSF-4 Dr. W Project Address: 180 Pago Pago City: Naples State: FL Zip:34113 Applicant: Nick Pearson Nick Pearson- Turell Agent Name: 3484 Exchange Ave. Agent/Firm Address: Hall & Ass Naples City: p 239-643-0166 State: FL Zip. 34101 Property Owner: Michael A. Giovanone & Deborah L. Giovanone Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage 0.18 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. JIM MA For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 251 Cof� 3.D.e er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 Zo�✓i,✓� -- ?o�w tl.�c,c.y If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddletonQnaplesgov.com Allyson Holland AM Holland cDnaplesgoy.com Robin Singer RSingelb-naplesgov.com Erica Martin emartin(cDnaplesgov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 252 3.D.e Pre -Application Meeting Notes GMD - Zoning Services Planner: John Kelly (239)252-5719 John.kelly(&col l iercountyfl.gov Boat Dock Extension • Complete the required application; respond to each question and sign • Refer to the Final Submittal Requirement Checklist and provide/submit required documents o All submitted plans must be legible when duplicated on 8.5" X 11" standard paper o The final recording of documents is in black & white; minimize the use of color • Provide a Boundary Survey to demonstrate water frontage and lot dimensions as well as the principal use of the subject property • Either as part of the application, or on a separate sheet, provide a detailed Narrative Statement fully describing the project and what is being requested • On a sheet separate from the application, please provide persuasive and convincing responses to each of the Primary and Secondary Criteria contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.1-1 o state if each criterion has been satisfied or not satisfied o provide sufficient evidence to support any claims such as insufficient water depth, unique characteristics of the property or waterfront, width of waterway and/or canal • Site Plans o Site Plans should be measured in feet o Note that the dock facility includes any docked vessel(s); show vessel(s) on plan o Demonstrate width of property and/or the total property water frontage o Demonstrate side and/or riparian setbacks for the dock facility o Demonstrate amount of dock protrusion using such points of measure as are contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.C.1, Measurement of Dock Protrusion. Note that dock facilities should be minimized to allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel(s) for loading, unloading, and routine maintenance without the use of excessive deck area Boathouse • See above for general information • On a sheet separate from the application, please provide persuasive and convincing responses to each of the Boathouse Criteria contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.17 o state if each criterion has been satisfied or not satisfied o provide sufficient evidence to support any claims such as insufficient water depth, unique characteristics of the property or waterfront, width of waterway and/or canal Site Plans o Demonstrate setback requirements from property and riparian lines, demonstrate the separation from other structures on the site, Demonstrate height of boathouse and type of roof; note that the roof alone may overhang up to 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or setback (plans must show the amount of roof overhang) Packet Pg. 253 3.D.e CoNew County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes FVVt"N my"VI-aL -Q"16 'aAAwKJ - 9- A- k7tA--6V-D MA-4u JJo%4-S /+1.1b Chen I.LSTs ?A&"L 3 A.- 3 A-. . Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 254 3.D.e ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2021 1:41 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: PL20210000708 180 Pago Pago Drive Attachments: Boat Dock Extension Checklist 2016.doc Thomas, Here are my notes for the Pre-app. Please provide a_ benthic survey with an exhibit to indicate the location of seaarasses or ovster beds within 200 feet of the proposed docking facility. LDC Section 5.03.06.J Please provide a description of the shoreline and any native vegetation present. Indicate any proposed impacts to the native shoreline vegetation (approximate area in square feet to be impacted). Please provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria #5 and #6 See LDC section 5.03.06. H.2 If lighting is proposed, please provide a description of the type and locations on the docking facility. Please provide any written authorization from any state and federal agencies if any approvals have been obtained. The property is located adiacent to an ST Overlav zone and will need an ST permit prior to the issuance of the buildina ermit for the docking facility. Craig Brown Senior Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 255 3.D.e Residential Boat Dock Extension Checklist Submerged Resources Survey Checklist 1. Is there an overlay? ST overlay needs an ST permit (much of Isle of Capri & Keewaydin has an ST Overlay over the water) 2. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph. (LDC 5.03.06 I) Provide a submerged resources survey from an Environmental Consultant done between April and October. P530 3. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least ten feet from any existing; seagrass beds, or meet restrictions for continuous beds. (LDC 5.03.06 J.) P530 4. Provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria #5 & #6. (Use Misc in CV) 5. Demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized. (LDC 5.03.06 J .4) P530 6. The dock shall be field adjusted to minimize impacts to mangroves. (LDC 5.03.06 I.2) Remove this checklist item — look at LDC? P530 7. Provide a clearing plan for removal of any vegetation related to the boat dock. This is simply an information exhibit being requested. (Use Misc in CV) 8. Are there any draft restrictions? Look at the MPP. (Use Misc in CV) Keewaydin: BDE not required for Keewaydin - Most always need an ST permit related to a Building Permit— water and land have ST Overlay Seagrass: Light penetration is needed to survive, usually in more shallow areas Submerged Resources Survey: - Read thoroughly - Check location description for street & waterway (if given) - Check to see if it was uploaded to CV - Indicate in CV "Comments box" if one was done & if it was uploaded to CV *****SEE SUGGESTED FORMAT OF SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ON NEXT PAGE***** �a Packet Pg. 256 3.D.e MULTI SLIP DOCKING FACILITY • Look at supplemental criteria in 5.05.02 o Port of the Islands uses different Rating system — see MPP • See 5.03.06 E I and 5.05.02 for Manatee awareness requirements for multi -slip docking facilities Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(I1) of this LDC. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated). Packet Pg. 257 1 3.D.e SUGGESTION FORMAT AND INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ➢ Location of survey — property address and folio# o The survey shall indicate any seagrass or seagrass beds located within 200 feet on any proposed dock facility (5.03.06.J). In order for this to be accomplished, any within 200 feet of the proposed dock (within the riparian lines of the property and adjacent to the property) shall be surveyed. ➢ Who did the survey — which firm and their contact information including name, address, phone #, email ➢ What date was the survey conducted? Guidance from FWC isAo do between April and October o Weather conditions, water temperature, low tide & high tide times ➢ Objective of Survey & Work done on the site o Was the site snorkeled? o What methodologies were used? o Was a GPS used? o Was an aerial photograph reviewed and used to establish survey transect lines? ➢ Results o What was found? Substrate and what kind? Seagrass, shell, oysters? o What was along the shoreline? Mangroves, seawall, etc? o Why does the consultant think no submergerd resources were found? o Other observations ➢ When seagrass is found, include all requirements of LDC section 5.03.06. J. ➢ Conclusions o Were any submerged resources found? If yes, what? o Are any impacts to submerged resources expected or proposed? ➢ Pictures (suggested angles) o Looking toward and away from the shoreline o The proposed location of the boat access o Observations in the water - Any oyster debris, shell, seagrass 5.03.06. J. (LDC section up to date as of 2016) cm Protection of seagrass beds. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed docks, dock facilities, or 3 boathouses shall be protected through the following standards: � 1. Where new docking facilities or boat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or M m seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a :2 scale of 1 inch to 200 feet when available from the County, or a scale of 1 inch to 400 feet when such �M-' photographs are not available from the County. The location of seagrass beds shall be verified by the County .2 Manager or designee prior to issuance of any project approval or permit. a 2. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds, Q except where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, 2 and to minimize negative impacts to seagrasses and other native shoreline, emergent and submerged vegetation, and hard bottom communities. t 3. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, the um applicant shall be allowed to build a dock across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet of a seagrass beds. Such docking facilities shall comply with the following conditions: a. The dock shall be at a height of at least 3.5 feet NGVD. m E b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 160 square feet. c. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet. d. The access dock and terminal platform shall be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds Q possible. Packet Pg. 258 R a ft, 3.D.e 4. The petitioner shall be required to demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized prior to any project approval or permit issuance. Packet Pg. 259 Co*lr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20210000708 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ 45teve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Aaurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard @colIiercountyfLgov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jackie De la Osa North Collier Fire 252-2312 jdelaosa@northcollierfire.com ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy. Frantz@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humph ries@colliercountyfLgov ❑Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 1 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf Zoning Senior Planner 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 3.D.e a Packet Pg. 260 Co*:r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 bra ndy.otero@colIiercountyfLgov Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email L&iL 44-u�.— Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 3.D.e Packet Pg. 261 3.D.e Co Ter C0-94ftty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL2021000708 —180 Pago Pago Dr.-Giovanone (BDE) Planner- John Kelly PRE-APP INFO Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Jeremy Frantz,(Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Nick Pearson, Turrell, Hall & Associates nick@thanaples.com • Agent to list for PL# Nick Pearson, Turrell, Hall & Associates. • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Michael A. & Deborah L. Giovanone • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (BDE) Extension of an existing dock and boathouse an additional 8 feet into the waterway for access and maintenance to a larger vesse. • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): N/A • Details about Project: See attached exhibits. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-6866 Created April 5, 2017 0Location: K-\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning Division • 28W North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, Florida 34104.239.252-2400 • www.cdiergm.net packet Pg. 262 t Coeor County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the 0 10 CI ufI ILcIgtf VI JUuI If ILCf eJL: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage oT stocK owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Created 9/28/2017 Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 263 Got[-ier County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the g f 0 eneral and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the L 'I I�.CI J, JL-UUNI I IUCI J, UC I It I I L I dI I CS, UI PdI II IU15. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease UI a USA: Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 a U M m c U Q a Q 0 c a� E U Q c aD E U Q Packet Pg. 264 CoTY County 3.D.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 265 3.D.e Colr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Establishment Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 [] ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey [�' ❑ Chart of Site Waterway ❑ Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 [f ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 Er] ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: 6/26/2020 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 266 3.D.e CO*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Director ❑ Historical Review Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): AmyHeartlock ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Other: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Other: FEE 713oat 1REMENTS: Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ,PD. re -Application Meeting, if required: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees; a new pre - application meeting may be required.) [� Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑ An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Signature of Petitioner or Agent 6/26/2020 Date Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 267 I 3.D.e I Addressing Checklist Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL CoIL 00 W 0 ca co O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 268 4� Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be si , n�Y Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) 0 BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) ISLES OF CAPRI NO 2 LOT 193 R26, S32 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 52392360008 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 180 Pago Pago Dr. Naples, FL 34113 LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 180 Pago Pago Dr. - BDE petition name not yet approved PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Packet Pg. 269 4� Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: [�] Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Nick Pearson (Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.) Phone: (239) 643-0166 Email/Fax: Nick@THAnaples.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 52392360008 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved b : )4/ z �/_ Date: 03/01 /2021 pp Y Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Packet Pg. 270 a� 0 M - M as 06ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld : bL60Z) do)l:)e8 s,lueoilddd - a wowyoeuv : owLi3ew Q 0 6L 0 -Ii ILL LPL 0 W LQL rrr VJ J Q W Q Z D 0 U a� ` r O U Z � H U) Z U)w Z a� O O� Ln� �� ULL❑ w LU w N co N uiW LEI W_ O°' O~ N0O J J �0— ZZ Q0 Z ui OxOd Lu ❑Q� ❑~ U Q o Z w❑ w F- Z w� FAQ V ao � v zv v� d N z 0 $ N o M z m 0 Z F 3 a i w U w gawmw W w p x N 0 O U N W z Q Zz 0 0 O O c� z� � o �w > w v M o 0 73 w P:\1864.00-Giovanone-180 Pago Pago\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\1864-STATE.dwg LOCATION 2/18/2021 I 3.D.e I Affidavit of Representation Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL COIL 00 W 0 ca 00 O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 272 3.D.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) r'1_20210000708 1 Michael Giovanone (print name), as (title, if applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant=contract purchaser7land that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pre$. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. + If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. . If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". + In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. I cN 1(r j Z01-1 Sig a Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of r physical presence or El online notarization this day of 20?, by (printed name of owner or qualifiier)1 lic*AQ&1 Gi avanong, Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 0 Are personally known to me 0 Has produced a current drivers license [] Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: 44iiy CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 lJORDAN LEE RICE: �i° a 'sNotary Public -State of Florida _• Commission # GG 947550 �p+;`my Commission Expires January 15, 2024 Packet Pg. 273 3.D.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION PL20210001685 FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) I, DZ6('A G I O VAnbn e (print name), as (title, if applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize TurreIt, Hatt & Associates, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee': • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER J0-Z/-Z / Date Ne, foregoing 'nstr merit was ackno leged before me by means of physical presence or ❑ online notarization this ay of , 20 21, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: L✓J Are personally known to me �s produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identification. �/f�j Notary Signature:PU Y U ROSANNE P. CIERVO Notary Public, State of New York Qualified in Schenectady County Reg. No. 01016143236 CP\08-COA-00115\155 Commission -Expires June 26, 20 `z 2 REV 3/4/2020 Packet Pg. 274 I 3.D.e I BDE Drawings / Exhibits Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL CoIL 00 W 0 co co O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 275 Q 0 0 J LL LL W Q - M aQ 06ed o6ed M 348 80L000MOZ-1d : tiL60Z) dnpe8 s,;ueoilddd - Cl ;uewt4oe;;d :;uewt43e; rA r U r D 0 U W J 0 U J W O} Q U J z O 4 III W m- o OZ) �a Z O a� O U z D H � z O W a� of LL 0 L� W W W LO 04 i MC) co op op co (n W LO N 00 O Z Z z J LL rA � Q 0 W Vj 0 CG0J 0- C)LU pD a-Z a z W 0 W F- ¢O SOD F�a 0 cry zv v� ':\1864.00-Giwanone-180 Pago Pago\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 10/14/2021 I� - M as o6ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld : bL60Z) do)loe8 s,;ueoilddd - a ivauayoe;;d :;uowLj3 ;;V P.11 ~ �J 0 m ii/ W Z_ J F- F- ry LU n 71 • r r � 110, LU W J X NNZ w LL d Q CL CL_ Q � w CO zO U- X 00 Wm0� Y U O C) (D z cn oU)wxw w N Cb IL p w J J m 0 IL Q o FOf 6 >Wo > OOwrc��a¢ N Rwo awx o� I www t00 w�= °u� 0 w0 w0 ° �wxo mwQ 4 IL61� vaiw Zriw°¢� ii n W zZzofaw F op m 3N>>o0 gzz ' N z�Ow�3zz o M U F �HrYKQ zx Z P O<W52H=°x� o ..0 0_'J0 ax—� w o O aay aw3H zza w •• •• N Q w 18'0Z Q Y un w w w LU lo� �wcn Q 80 W I� - M as o6ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld : bL60Z) do)loe8 s,;ueoilddd - a ivauayoe;;d :;uowLi3e;;V00 ti -0 N N z � Of 1a 7 V a a_ Q O 1 z z 0 � 0 I �0 �Y�m w o w o O Q Li I ,z .8 0Z .Z£ 0 Z J a z J O D O3;r1��ON W M w a )Tr 0 a p¢4 LL' wOOri li;_, N d U W Z' 0a LLLLw zz> iI LLmz z o c w xa Wa a�7?w Kz wH0 ��jKO W az- oll Om d'�So K) �NLL w a a Z .W3 W @ WaK �w0 220KW H W ~ SSM 00 O 3�zz0 a�az�o,'L-Z, aowo 10¢w�Uz a=3wOa fA wwO>wm.I— mmaaa W Ix Z J� 2P:, 000 F Ea¢m aw3E aEE Z Z �— 11.2' -�i � O U) c� Y z U w .6Z ~ mow 11.2' OU)z w Z_ O—F O J U d } Q z F- O > O Q� - w Q Y dLL U a- U �I LL 0 z O u)a- LU � HROP 1314D AERIAL 1 - M as o6ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld : bL60Z) do)loe8 s,lueoilddd - a wowyoeuv : owLioew z 0 H U W N U a di J ci N ti N a .r L) m a N _d I N Z 0 F 0 z F S2 3 w w W 4a x ° x U) I.IJ z 0 �c Zo � U w U) U) U) k L 1_ U 3 80 - M aQ 06ed o6ed M 348 80LOOOOLZOZ-ld : tiL60Z) dnMoe8 s,;ueoilddd - p;uewt4oe;;d :;uewt43e o �� u w I~i\\�\ �m m %o %W �N %U) U) 0 ED z o o Z O o m o ¢wow o o U 111 ow ❑ o o N I.IJ z 0 m m Z o- w a CO N )0 U 3 y O C4 C, M E; U y a u u o on V M � U N w /\ P:\1864.00-Giovanone-180 Paao Pago\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE.dwo CROSS SECTION BB 10/14/2021 m 0 M - M as o6ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld : bL60Z) do)lae8 s,lueailddd - a wowyaeuv :;uauayae; Ind oo N Cb IL a �a IL D RESOURCE AV �� - M as 06ed 06ed 084 348 80L0000 6ZOZ-ld bL60Z) do)loe8 s,;ueoilddd - a ivawLioL' ;d :;uGwLj3e; 0 M v u m 10. al � err �f.ti 'ZZ N 00 N 6 a m u m a TZN d N DOCKS 1 M as o6ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld bL60Z) do)loe8 s,;ueoilddd - a ivauayoe;;d :;uowLj3e;;V a� 00 0 N a t e. vt{{ `♦ fti . .'ycr';.• O Z F. � F� c , w o sr N _ Z r I 3.D.e I Environmental Data (See Submerged Resource Survey) Packet Pg. 284 I 3.D.e I Y V O O C O C R O Professional Survey 0 O IL COIL 00 W 0 ca 00 O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 285 - M as 06ed o6ed on 3a8 80L000UNZld : VL60Z) dnioea sjueoilddy - a;uawyoeuV :;uawyoeuV d 0 M O O Z Z oMoWz W O woww°W oo� 0) UP J LLw 0(.) noaFW o N OQOO¢ ZV CQ0 W F- <OU0 Z N � LLJ� OWOO p QpOF¢�= Qa O IN UILN OCi _j dwCD ° wU a5mm,xw a o 1-w} U OUZ ¢ LL dZWa0r� =LL Fv- j<wwF-ZpFp }dQ oM Z IL WY a Wj�>o � u)~< U O O O°mpO O7 � ' Q' 2< o 0 JW)a W w U QWw � OF '�o a W wW 0 J ° =) rnW d owooZON 2Q LLZ =LLjW��LLliLL n � m� OU n F rn o o� O I- O W Of Ljj J O W ~� �r�°�"0 IS O < F cn Q ww U00 L) it zQ c i w -F. J-i �� U U U a p pW K w ❑ w Z m NZ WI❑L ¢ 'w'a ww❑<m OJ w 10n ¢> gz a�� L¢L��w pl-a O pq < aa`nmaw >Z �OWOZ SQ zW.0 m aw _ ¢< F-=w0¢¢ Q o w mFO-a F Wa WZz OZW od W F52 F. zm mjm ¢ =O ZOt--WiWpw�� 0 0 W, Z' W�WmZ Oz DUa pN F-IL ONzo jmKmww _� <O w - �O F-m 0z O 71` �� 00 pules mm<oOmm Q d' O= <~ N �W�zw zoWlim0 49 y� O<m ==mmm¢ wo m LLI �� OzzEr )>00Z ZO O� u'aw oo=Vviix ¢O = p F-� i ~o�mmvi ¢mZ"-'' oN �w i<w -FI~-z~a U'pF- UW m �- Zi F- F_a p F¢¢WF'm O¢a Oo ZW mm < �QWF❑� W2NFO Owm w~ IW-Z2 aKFjLLo mo QZ <' 0Z m <�OZOQ ZwX=> QY �O j00 �OWm K dYw mm NOO w 0O0F=-30 mO Wwm m� OU moo> <. -z<� �Oom S= z�m > m<owwF- WaU' Qw ZU Sm yOW W-w o<aw=o wwm2 ot, m0 ow0 w Q�oOma zm ZOZp om Om w<Q O0m0 W m��❑ t-F- Ww> O 2<o>=ID «wOW ail` Wf dLLm z-H of ZFZ0 wQ xxN3 w WNQm�Z UW UOf m0 rn3 KZ a>p F-Opw Z- �d UZ ti >owl QZZ<F- ZZ O a0 OmZ w0 ¢WZW W<mOli. mwa�Wo w2Q0=U O� KW I-p IJaJlm-O=K Wqz mmwo� 00 0<y O W<< Ww DO wwli 4a II aQ �IW-.. FWww oQO f- W==O aZ pjF- F mm�wwm mw Q>< JU WY mQ0 m=,Uw> p =F-m� gw ace= ¢ =oommI- 01-<0> m w =� � � zn�m�° � F-Zmw w WWU' O F-ZZo<o NO I.< wwa� ~O V?0Q pQ><Z0 Z �0<O c.i< mR v vi¢¢Oa0 16 I�ozw ao❑ 6 X. Ozm PRBD20190103811 additional review notes:DIGITAL SURVEY REC'D, 'PROVED, SETBACKS OK, DOCK, DIGITAL GNATURE VALIDATED ChurchWilliam 07/03/2019 57 AM a ae m LL 2 Z oo. 0 oy o S O o0 00. `o O� 0% N o t W? u O O�O o dJ rnub o, o i_s �o W 00 "Wm z Z W U s26 o�Pl E 101' LL N W to F C'1W� y 0) < 0 2OZ p Zz �5 m v C � v o • o � A C) • O~ m m o_ d1z a co 00 N �Q"a m N d M N 7 M f0 �z4a W �uw m 0.0 o�LL U O U U v o 0 CID U M M N EO COO N 0) N rn 3 ❑ w w O of D a w O�pzlW-wal- xQ W W OW ,❑�� w�'m0 ¢ apwwa Iv > z O. F-w ❑O w n nj n� (W > m 7 a w w=Qz_00¢ p Q OO?-UO O �j Q.m II Nym#A LL m FW- mW 0 Qd YE �N w H W omZ'0 O�CO FW-a_m'Zs w > 0:D w F- ❑ u m O w O a Vj c F z a O n W W o u Zm W. z m~ O w 7 U? W w W a0 j mQ w m z m-, d za,m F- 0 W Y m F-O W 2 ❑ �' F- 2 0 Z N O Z WT � w z 0¢ Z Il Z m w Z m Z w m m ZwO�OUwm W orO W7� Oa• o Z O z z Inl vm=i O W Y es IQ w v O< 2 2 z 2 2 w U W Q F- o O Z wIt, o x p 2 o Y OO m w m W d j m Z w Q fjj - z vz O z wwat1 Zc7DO �.J Jm ZQZm 0 F- F . z , F- n < o � p y m o m O m n O a u ¢ a W m� p k Umull mU ,Ia0C, m II O u n w •0 z m0 Ol� O Q�wn:a0a�a�a� jom� so �g 00 W N LL Q \ °LL :00pst� B�,,0 5o Vj ,�\ / N 00 N Y N \ � �n �cc� Y w O W \ z M = F z \ FaQmo o F m Y O Z m I 3.D.e I Submerged Resource Survey Y V O O C O C R O_ 0 O IL COIL 00 W 0 Ca CO O 0 0 O O N O N J d all r a Packet Pg. 287 I 3.D.e I 180 PAGO PAGO DR. W NAPLES, FL 34140 FOLIO #46372680002 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT APRIL 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE:239-643-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM Packet Pg. 288 I 3.D.e I Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 2 Objective.............................................................................................................................................2 3 Methodology......................................................................................................................................3 4 Results.................................................................................................................................................4 5 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................5 6 Photos.................................................................................................................................................. 6 a+ a Packet Pg. 289 I 3.D.e I 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 1 Introduction Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) has been contracted to provide environmental services in the form of a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS) at a property addressed as 180 W Pago Pago Dr. in Naples, FL 34113 and that can be identified by folio #52392360008. This survey will provide planning assistance to both the property owner and regulating agencies during any review processes for the proposed project, which consists of expanding on an existing private, recreational single-family docking facility with 2 boatlifts. The subject property consists of a 0.18-acre parcel that can be found on the south side of Pago Pago Dr. W, backing up to a man-made bay. The parcel currently contains a single-family residence with a seawall shoreline and an existing dock and boathouse. The property is neighbored to the north, east, and west by single-family residences, and to the south by a man- made waterway connecting to Big Marco Pass. Nearly all surrounding lots contain additional docking facilities (with boatlifts) similar in size to that which is proposed. The SRS was conducted on April 14th, 2021, between 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. Site conditions consisted of clear, sunny skies and 5 to 15 mph winds out of the east. Water clarity was poor, allowing for submerged visibility of roughly only 12 to 18 inches on average. The ambient air temperature was approximately 73 degrees Fahrenheit and ambient water temperature was approximately 75 degrees Fahrenheit. Low tide occurred during the site visit at 9:08 a.m. and reached approximately 0.9 ft. above the mean low water mark. High tide occurred following the site visit at 2:22 p.m. and reached 2.7 ft. above the mean low water mark. 1 Packet Pg. 290 I 3.D.e I 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 2 Obj ective The objective of the SRS was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200 feet (per Collier County regulations) of the proposed docking facility expansion. Ordinarily, if seagrasses or other resources are present within the vicinity of a project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts projected by the proposed project. The presence of resources may be ample cause for re -configuration of the design for projects over surface waters in order to minimize potentially incurred impacts. The general scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized below: • THA personnel will conduct a site visit and swim a series of transects within the project site in order to verify the location of any submerged resources. • THA personnel will identify submerged resources within the vicinity of the site and produce an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found. • THA personnel will delineate the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed via a handheld GPS device. • All findings of the SRS are then documented into a formal report with exhibits. 2 Packet Pg. 291 I 3.D.e I 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 3 Methodology THA biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover not only the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation but also the area within 200 ft. of the proposed site. The components utilized for this survey included: • Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area. • Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto aerials. • Physically swimming the transects, GPS locating the limits of any submerged resources found, and determining the percent coverage within the area. • Documenting and photographing all findings. The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transect lines throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. Neighboring properties, docking facilities, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in maintaining correct positioning over each transect. During this SRS, one THA staff member swam the transect lines using snorkel equipment while a second remained on the shore taking notes and compiling findings on an aerial of the project site. Ordinarily, if any resources are found, they are photographed, GPS located, delineated, and analyzed for percent coverage within the area via a half meter square quadrat. 3 Packet Pg. 292 I 3.D.e I 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 4 Results The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of a silty muck material with occasional shell debris. The substrate appeared consistent throughout the project site to the limits of the survey area. Additionally, depths increased gradually with distance from the shoreline to the center of the waterway. The shoreline at the project site consists of vertical seawall supported by rip rap. No mangroves or other natural shoreline are found within the vicinity of the project site. There was also an existing docking facility and boathouse present at the project site at the time of the site visit. Besides oysters found on the existing dock piles and seawall panels, no other natural shoreline, seagrasses, or other submerged resources were observed at the project site. Because the existing dock piles and seawall will remain, no impacts to submerged resources are expected to occur as the result of the proposed project. A list of species observed during the SRS can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site Common Name Scientific Name Common Bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus Atlantic shee shead Archosargus probatocephalus Striped mullet Mugil cephalus Eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Common barnacle Balanus spp. Cauler a Caulerpa spp. Mangrove snapper Lutjanus griseus 4 Packet Pg. 293 I 3.D.e I 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 5 Conclusion The submerged resource survey was conducted and completed throughout a 200-foot radius surrounding the project site and yielded no results besides the oysters present on the dock piles and seawall panels, neither of which will be affected by the proposed docking structures. Accordingly, negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected as a result of the proposed project. 5 Packet Pg. 294 I 3.D.e I 6 Photos 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 Photo 1: Existing docking facility on site. Photo 2: Seawall and rip rap on site. 0 Packet Pg. 295 I 3.D.e I 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 Photo 3: Underside of docking facility. Photo 4: Cross -waterway view of subject property. 7 Packet Pg. 296 I 3.D.e I 180 Pago Pago Dr. W (Folio #52392360008) Submerged Resource Survey April 2021 Photo 5: Typical view of bottomlands found on site. Photo 6: Additional view of bottomlands on subject property. Packet Pg. 297 a� 0 M - M aQ 06ed o6ed 08 L 308 80L000MOZ-1d : tiL60Z) dnMoe8 s,;ueoilddd - Cl ;uewt4oe;;d :;uewt43eUV Q 0 6L 0 -Ii ILL LPL 0 W LQL rrr VJ a� ` r O U Z D H U) Z z Z w a� O LL O Ln �� ULL❑ w LU w N co N uiW LEI O~ N0O W_ O°' ZZ Z J J �0— Q0 ui OxOd Lu ❑Q� ❑~ U Q o Z w❑ w F- Z w� FAQ V ao � v zv v� 00 m N 6) a m ea a d U) z 0 _ 0 a z 0 zzw <w�w w N W z Q Zz 0 0 O O c� z� � o �w > w M � Sl N P:\1864.00-Giovanone-180 Pago Pago\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-13DE 6-8-21.dwg LOCATION MAP 6I8I2021 I� M as o6ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld : bL60Z) do)loe8 s.lueoilddd - a ivawLioL' v :iuowLj3ejjv z J ¢ m J Fy L-4 0 ry O ry m a_ O LLJ Z Z J D OW h 93 � *. X U) w o 107' 0 w Via; 0 a 0¢4 a � ) W 2 - X O O w1 wa¢ F o w y mm¢ 3 g �wO 4Kg ae �z J ZU0 mzz � p�O wp= w 0O w M p w 2= 0 I wz>3: u u w w r wr ow¢��¢ 3°z �Z°0,zOwr z °or>c¢Zoo33 z Vjww J�u°i I2<2 W xJm o-x0 F r¢¢rn ¢war o 0 w Z . . . . . . S2 U U) P:\1864.00-Giovanone-180 Paqo Paao\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE 6-8-21.dwq EMY2WMG AERIAL 6/8/2021 a� 0 M F- N Q ww zw ww ti Im 2F z d O� xQ 'Lr o z z Z 0 O �w �C)w Q� wwQ = 0 -1 c�O0- d U Q o — w W Q Z_ ZZ C�>if) xQU 4b�0O—Q U) �Y0-Qm XQO �UF-ww w �cv W 0 cn AaLL SOU) w �aQ 0z - M as 06ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006Z0Z-ld : bL60Z) dn)loe8 s,lueollddd - a wowyoeuv : owLjoew a z i o; w z: w� o i w 2 o X w Qor- co ICI /T\ . i W 0 J W 5' f I ✓ 6 EXISTING DOCK w z0 co ~ Q w M 00 I I N N N 10' uiw QZ J � z X 0-1 aQ CL NwN Q F- Q Z_ Q Q' J 0 m D_ F- � W Q dJ UO_ 0� Z w F- X w Lo mi 0 0 m 6 a .r a M Z 0 F 0 w w P:\1864.00-Giovanone-180 Pago Pago\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE 6-8-21.dwQ BARUPDSED AERIAL 6/8/2021 0�� M as 06ed 06ed 084 348 80L00006ZOZ-ld : bL60Z) do)loe8 s,lueoilddd - a iuewLiaeuv :;uGwLj3ejjv 0 M � W W H Z W W > LL -3 W000 � OLLLL� U ❑ twoLu Q > N LLI Z Z� W LLL.I 0 co U W 1n z Q F W 0 J Q U a. } H m1 13) a .r L) m a 01 lOOZ } I U ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o0 o Q w w oz� 0 M � U 16 W P:\1864.00-Giovanone-180 Paqo Paao\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1864-BDE 6-8-21.dwq MEMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 6/8/2021 3.D.f Collier county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercou ntyfl.sov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner PL20210000708 For Petition Number(s): Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Michael Giovanone (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name:'( �Lm-� G I O Ufl,,Aowe Signature: ® Applicant* El Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: 1Z ` S 2- * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 302 3.D.f Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.co I I ie rcou ntvfl.eov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner PL20210000708 For Petition Number(s): Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Debra Giovanone (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Do&_4 �110o) q 0 Signature:g ® Applicant* ® Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: 1Q ./,%, f z * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 303