HEX Final Decision 2022-02Page 1 of 7
HEX NO. 2022-02
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
December 23, 2021
PETITION.
PETITION NO. BDE-PL20200002573 – 10090 &10091 Gulf Shore Dr. – Request for a 25-
foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways
greater than 100 feet in width, to allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a
total of 45 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06. The
subject property is located adjacent to 10091 Gulf Shore Drive, further described as the
North 50 feet of Lot 14, Block C, Re-Subdivision of Part of Unit No. 1, Conner’s Vanderbilt
Estates, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The petitioner desires to reconfigure the existing dock facility that required a similar Boat Dock
Extension (BDE-PL20110001573) and companion Variance (VAPL20110001576) for a 25-foot
extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet
in width to construct a boat docking facility protruding a total of 45 feet into a waterway.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in-person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in-person.
5. There is a companion Petition No. VA-PL20210002276 for a dock side/riparian setback
reduction.
Page 2 of 7
6. The subject property at 10090 Gulf Shore Drive is a small legal non-conforming lot,
approximately 50 feet x 30 feet, situated at the southwest corner of a canal, between two single-
family residential lots. As a result of this oddity, the property’s riparian area resembles an
isosceles right triangle, and the existing dock is an accessory to the single-family residence
across the street at 10091 Gulf Shore Drive. The disconnected property and existing dock were
all worked out and approved in 2011, as described below.
7. The existing dock navigated a series of public hearings in 2011 to obtain a side-riparian setback
of zero feet where no less than 7.5 feet is permitted as of right, and a dock extension of 19 feet
beyond the 20-foot limit. These two variances were denied by the Planning Commission but
approved by the County Commission (acting in its capacity as the Board of Zoning Appeals).
Those resolutions are attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A.” Those approvals and
the associated backup documentation appear to legitimize the odd property configuration
bisected by Gulf Shore Drive and, for purposes of the residential dock, unifies 10091 and
10090 Gulf Shore Drive. In other words, the dock at 10090 can only be an accessory to 10091.
10090 Gulf Shore Drive is not a stand-alone boat dock lot.
8. Fast forward ten years, the property owner is requesting the same type of variances to
accommodate a larger vessel (48 feet) from the one approved in 2011 (35 feet). To accomplish
this within the unique riparian area, the dock plan is angled and shifted north, putting the large
vessel on the south side of the dock and a proposed “decked over elevator lift” for personal
watercrafts/kayaks on the north side of the dock. To accomplish this cleaver use of the small
right-triangular riparian area, the companion variances requested are for a zero riparian setback
and a 25-foot extension. This decision pertains to the dock extension variance.
9. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s
representative. There were no objections at the public hearing.
10. The County’s Land Development Section 5.03.06.H. lists the criteria for dock facility
extensions. The Hearing Examiner may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a boat dock
extension request if it is determined that at least four (4) of the five (5) primary criteria, and at
least four (4) of the six (6) secondary criteria have been met.1
Primary Criteria:
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation
to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property.
Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are
the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be
appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-
1 The Hearing Examiner’s findings are italicized.
Page 3 of 7
family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island
docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject property is improved with a single-family residence at 10091
Gulf Shore Drive, allowing for up to two boat slips by the standards in the zoning district.
The proposed project consists of replacing the existing dock facility with a two-lift docking
facility; one lift is to accommodate a 48-foot vessel and the other will be decked-over to be
used for kayaks and/or up to two personal watercraft.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or
moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should establish
that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s)
described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
NOT BEEN MET. Water depth is not the driving factor for this petition. The applicant is
seeking the subject BDE to accommodate a 48-foot vessel which required the existing dock
facility to be reconfigured.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an
adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock facility is located at the end of a canal and is not located
within any marked or charted navigable channel. The applicant further states that the
proposed dock has been designed to not restrict the waterway any further than the existing
facilities. No abutting or nearby residents objected to this petition.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the
waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintai n the
required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. As noted within the project purpose/description, this dock facility is located
on a unique parcel with only 50 feet of water frontage located at the terminal end of a man-
made canal. The applicability of this criteria is challenging as the parcel is located on a
canal measuring 104± feet in width; however, the opposite shoreline is 1,400± feet to the
east. Typically, the protrusion measurement for this criterion is taken to wither the MHWL
or, when applicable, to a dock facility on the opposite shore. The only reference as to how
to determine width is located within LDC Section 5.03.06.C.2.a which is not applicable; it
indicates width is measured to the property directly across the waterway. Additionally, the
proposed dock facility will be within the allocated riparian area. The proposed dock
Page 4 of 7
facility satisfies the intent of this criterion as the proposed dock facility protrudes less than
25 percent of 1,400± feet.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would
not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The property on which the proposed docking facility will be located has
already been granted a 0’ side riparian setback variance under Resolution 12- 265. The
main difference in this proposal, as opposed to the approved design, is that the portion of
the proposal that abuts the riparian line will be slightly further into the waterway (not
closer to or over the riparian line). Therefore, the proposed dock will not infringe upon the
side setbacks any more than has already been approved. Furthermore, it will be located
entirely within the riparian area of the owner’s property. Being at the end of the canal, the
additional 9’ of protrusion should not affect any neighboring property owners. No
neighboring/abutting or nearby residents objected to this petition.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed
dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these
may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,
or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. As noted above the proposed dock facility is located at the southwestern end
of a man-made canal and has a total shoreline of 50 linear feet. Additionally, the
converging riparian lines associated with this parcel reduce the configuration and design
options of this dock facility. Therefore, the limited shoreline and associated riparian lines
are the special conditions causing this request.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not
directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock facility will cover only 288 square feet of overwater
structure and the finger pier portion has been minimized to 3 feet in width. The proposed
deck area is the minimum needed to support reasonable and safe access to vessels for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s
linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
Page 5 of 7
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
NOT BEEN MET. The subject dock facility has been designed to accommodate one 48-
foot vessel and two personal watercraft each of 12 feet; the combined vessel total is 72 feet
which exceeds 50 percent of the applicant’s total shoreline (50 feet).
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of
a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock has been designed within the designated riparian lines
and is located at the end of a canal; properties to the west are across gulf shore drive. As
the end of the canal already has two other dock facilities there should not be any impact to
existing views. No neighboring/abutting or nearby residents opposed this petition.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds
are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass beds
exist within 200-feet of the proposed dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by the
proposed dock facility.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section
5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion is
NOT APPLICABLE. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do
not apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the sea walled basin of
Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands.
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County’s staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner’s
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06.H
of the Land Development Code to approve Petition. The Petition meets 4 out of 5 of the primary
criteria and 4 out of 6 secondary criteria.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition No. BDE-PL20200002573, filed by Nick
Pearson of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., representing Andrew T. and Fern B. Jaffe, with respect
Page 6 of 7
to the property described as 10090-91 Gulf Shore Drive and is further described as the North 50
feet of Lot 14, Block C, Re-subdivision of part of Unit No. 1, Conner’s Vanderbilt Beach Estates,
in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida for the following:
• A 25-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed
by Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for waterways greater
than 100 feet in width, for a total protrusion of 45 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet
wide, for the benefit of the subject property.
Said changes are fully described in the Proposed Site and Dock Plans attached as Exhibit "B" and
are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A - Resolutions 2012-065 and 2012-066
Exhibit B - Proposed Site and Dock Plans
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
10090 Gulf Shore Drive and is further described as the North 50 feet of Lot 14, Block C, Re-
subdivision of part of Unit No. 1, Conner’s Vanderbilt Beach Estates, in Section 29, Township 48
South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida.
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. Subject to the approval of companion petition VA-PL20210002276.
3. The approval is only for the residence at 10091 Gulf Shore Drive.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
Page 7 of 7
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
________________________ ____________________________________
Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
EXHIBIT “A”
f
RESOLUTION NO. 12- 2 6 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO
PETITION NUMBER VA- PL2011 -1576, FOR A VARIANCE
FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION
5.03.06.E.7 TO PERMIT A REDUCED SIDE YARD
RIPARIAN) SETBACK FROM 7.5 FEET TO 0 FEET ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10090 GULF SHORE DRIVE
FOR THE BENEFIT OF 10091 GULF SHORE DRIVE,
CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES IN SECTION
29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST IN COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
Ordinance No. 2004 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after
notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance
from Section 5.03.06.E.7 of the Land Development Code to permit a reduced side yard (riparian)
setback from 7.5 feet to 0 feet as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ", in the RSF -3 Zoning
District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory
provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said
regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land
Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
Petition Number VA- PL2011 -1576 filed on behalf of Andrew Jaffe by Jeff Rogers of
Turrell, Hall and Associates, Inc. with respect to the property hereinafter described as:
Lot 34, Block A, and the North 50 feet of Lot 14, Block C, Re- subdivision of part
of Unit No. 1, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, according to the
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book No. 3, Page 18, of the Public Records of
Collier County, Florida (Folio No. 27530160008)
INSTR 4785436 OR 4874 PG 1962
RECORDED 1/9/2013 4A6 PM PAGES 3
Jaffe Variance /VA- PL2011 -1576 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
Rev. 12/12/12 1 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
REC $27.00
be and the same hereby is approved for a variance to permit a reduced side yard (riparian)
setback from 7.5 feet to 0 feet as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ", in the RSF -3 Zoning
District, wherein said property is located.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that two conditions of approval apply to this variance:
1) that the parcel in question be granted its companion boat dock extension as applied for in
BD- PL20110001573; and (2) that the lot containing the corresponding residence obtain a
Certificate of Occupancy for building permit number PRBD20120304314.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
1
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this
12th
day of
December, 2012.
ATTEST: BO
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK CO
y, b.i s`
k
By: By:
F
y
ut Clerk
Approved as- ,t `µfprfn'and legal sufficiency:
eidi Ashton -Cicko
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit A — Site Plan
CP\ 11- CPS - 01128/30
Jaffe Variance NA- PL2011 -1576
Rev. 12/12/12 2 of 2
OF ZON APPEALS
Z C:IOJJN , FLORIDA
3IA A. HILLER, ESQ.
Chairwoman
ro
LU 'm
0
CL Z
I=
CL M
0
Exhibit A
7777i
0z
W
0
0—
0
0.
to
W
8B
in
0
Z
Zx
0
a.
0
C)
w
1)
x
a.
0
n
0
6LJ
W
a ll 'a9it
2
a_
C) F-
L U.
0
0:
CL
wilt
0
6 . r, 040tl
cr)
OG
ro
LU 'm
0
CL Z
I=
CL M
0
Exhibit A
7777i
0z
W
0
0—
0
0.
to
W
Z
Zx
x
ro
LU 'm
0
CL Z
I=
CL M
0
Exhibit A
7777i
0z
W
0
0—
0
0.
to
W
EXHIBIT “B”
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.263339<> LONGITUDE:W -81.824228SITE ADDRESS:<> 10091 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES, FL 34108Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRLOCATION MAP48-------------------01 OF 07COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY
NESW0102041SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,10091 GULF SHORE DRNAPLESFL34108Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DREXISTING CONDITIONS48-------------------02 OF 07·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."04-24-14-1.31'+0.30'50'1511,445'29'50'28'50'EXISTING DOCK AND LIFTSRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEEXISTING SEAWALL31'39' OF PROTRUSIONAPPROVED PERRESOLUTION #12-2650' SETBACK APPROVED PER RESOLUTION #12-265
NESW051020SCALE IN FEET·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."04-24-14-1.31'+0.30'50'1511,445'28828845PROPOSED DOCKPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTINGSEAWALLTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRPROPOSED DOCK48-------------------03 OF 07PROPOSED DECKEDOVER ELEVATOR LIFT12'10'14'5
'14'5
'
3
4
'3'4
8
'8-POST BOAT LIFTAA04BB051
0
'29'50'10'25'15'1
9
'39'45'
-2.9-
4
.
5
-8.8-6.4-
7
.
6
-8.103612SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRCROSS SECTION AA48-------------------04 OF 0737' DOCK PROTRUSION20' 8-POSTBOATLIFTPROPOSEDDOCKEXISTINGSEAWALLMHWL = +0.30' NAVD 88MLWL = -1.31' NAVD 8848' BOAT PROTRUSIONALL PILES TO BEPVC WRAPPEDFROM 12: ABOVEMHWL TO 6" BELOWSUBSTRATE
0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION BB 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRCROSS SECTION BB48-------------------05 OF 07MHWL = +0.30' NAVD 88MLWL = -1.31' NAVD 88DEPTHSVARYPROPOSEDDOCK3'10' DECKEDOVERELEVATOR LIFT14'8-POSTBOATLIFTALL PILES TO BEPVC WRAPPEDFROM 12: ABOVEMHWL TO 6" BELOWSUBSTRATE
NESW0153060SCALE IN FEET·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."04-24-14-1.31'+0.30'50'1511,445'28828845PROPOSEDDOCKTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY48-------------------06 OF 0710'200'100'NO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT
NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETPROPOSEDDOCKTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\20132.00 jaffe dock-10091 gulf shore dr\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\20132-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCK 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:NPRMJ05-19-2120132.00-292510091 GULF SHORE DRADJACENT DOCK48-------------------07 OF 07NOTE: THE DIMENSIONS SHOWNARE APPROXIMATE AND ARETAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE103'24'21'21'51'18'36'45'