Loading...
Agenda 01/25/2022 Item #16A 8 (Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study)16.A.8 01/25/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study from Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard and continue public engagement as the project progresses through subsequent phases. OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study (Study) which evaluated corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard from Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard from a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. The study recommendations include pursuing intersection improvements, widening improvements, and roadway network improvements throughout the corridor. CONSIDERATIONS: Wilson Boulevard is a major north -south collector which serves as a critical component of Collier County's transportation network. The primary purpose of the Wilson Boulevard widening project was to evaluate alternatives to address future traffic congestion and lack of system connectivity in the Golden Gate Estates and eastern Collier County areas. The project is needed to relieve estimated future traffic congestion along Wilson Boulevard, particularly between Immokalee Road and the future Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBRX). This project is part of an overall plan to improve system connectivity in eastern Collier County that includes the planned VBRX project, and other committed projects such as the widening of Randall Boulevard to the east and extending VBRX farther east from 16th Street NE to Everglades Boulevard. The Study involved the evaluation of alternatives to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. To prioritize safety, comfort, and access to destinations for all people who use Wilson Boulevard, a Complete Streets approach was used to develop the proposed improvements, including the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes, as well as enhancing the existing bus stops. Additional project elements include changes to access along the project corridor, upgrades to the drainage system, replacement of the existing bridge over Cypress Canal, coordination of potential utility relocations, and acquisition of right-of-way (ROW). A typical section analysis was initially performed by evaluating various typical section options ranging in widths between 160 feet and 200 feet. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the typical section options were performed and included review of potential impacts to existing residential and non-residential properties, as well as the existing County production wells. These analyses resulted in a recommended typical section width of 165 feet, which provided the least amount of impacts while meeting design criteria. Three initial alternatives then were developed using the recommended typical section of 165 feet and applying its centerline to three alignments that were left, center, and right of the existing roadway easement centerline. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed on the initial alternatives. Coordination with the County revealed that the eleven (11) production wells within the project limits are some of the highest -producing wells in the system and produce approximately 2 1 % of the drinking water in Collier County. Collier County Public Utilities Department (PUD) staff indicated that the cost to relocate the production wells and associated infrastructure was between $2 Million and $3 Million dollars per well site and posed an additional risk that a new well could be less productive. PUD requested that the production wells not be impacted. Of the three initial alternatives, the alternative that was to the right of the existing roadway easement centerline (or right offset) provided the least impacts to the production wells, the existing residential homes and the existing commercial structures. The right offset alternative Packet Pg. 837 16.A.8 01/25/2022 was advanced as the project's viable alternative. The viable alternative was further refined during the Study as the Build Alternative. The Build Alternative was presented at the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study Public Meeting on October 27, 2021, for public review and comment, along with the No -Build Alternative. Based on comments received during the public meeting, the Build Alternative was further refined and is advanced as the Recommended Alignment. The existing typical section and the proposed recommended alignment typical section are provided below. 6' . 6 vvM� EXISTING WRIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT EXISTING 58' RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT PROPOSED 165' RIGHT OF WAY .................................... i 'PROPOSED 8D' RIGHT OF WAY 'PROPOSED 85' RIGHT OF WAY 'RIGHT OF WAY DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT TO CHANGE DURING DESIGN There is one existing bridge structure within the study area along Wilson Boulevard, Bridge No. 034032, which crosses the Cypress Canal, approximately 1.13 miles north of Golden Gate Boulevard. The bridge was constructed in 1960. According to the October 1, 2021, FDOT Florida Bridge Information Report, the last bridge inspection is dated April 7, 2021. The inspection noted a Sufficiency Rating of 76.2 and a Health Index of 96.44 for the existing bridge. The Study includes the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report for Wilson Boulevard Over Cypress Canal Bridge Replacement which finds that based on the recommended alignment, the need for added traffic capacity, and pedestrian and vehicular safety feature upgrades, the existing bridge is deemed to be functionally obsolete and will be replaced with a significantly wider bridge. If the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) accepts the Study but Packet Pg. 838 01/25/2022 16.A.8 does not pursue widening Wilson Boulevard at this time, the future bridge should be constructed based on the Study's recommended alignment. This Study has been coordinated with Collier Area Transit (CAT). CAT has three (3) bus routes and six (6) bus stops along the project corridor. The addition of pedestrian and bicycle facilities as well as bus stop pads on Wilson Boulevard will improve connectivity and allow for improved multimodal mobility from Wilson Boulevard to other major facilities in the area. The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has included the widening of Wilson Boulevard in its plans for many years. The 2045 LRTP listed the project in the Existing Plus Committed Projects. The Design, ROW and Construction phases of the proposed study recommendations are partially funded in the County's 5-Year Work Program FY2022-2026, located in the 2021 Annual Updated Inventory Report (AUIR). FISCAL IMPACT: The preliminary planning level estimated construction costs of the recommended alignment is $51.45 Million. This planning level estimate does not include design, environmental mitigation, right-of-way or construction engineering and inspection (CEI). The Board will have the opportunity to approve funding allocations as the project progresses. Approval of this item does not result in an additional fiscal impact of future phases or projects. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, raises no legal issues and requires majority vote for approval. -JAK RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Accept the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study from Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard; 2. Continue with public engagement with impacted stakeholders through the design and construction process. Prepared by: Lorraine Lantz, AICP, Principal Planner, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management ATTACHMENT(S) 1. [Linked] Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor Study (PDF) Packet Pg. 839 16.A.8 01/25/2022 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.A.8 Doe ID: 20891 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study from Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard and continue public engagement as the project progresses through subsequent phases. Meeting Date: 01/25/2022 Prepared by: Title: Project Manager — Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Name: Lorraine Lantz 12/23/2021 11:54 AM Submitted by: Title: Director — Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Name: Matthew McLean 12/23/2021 11:54 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Lissett DeLaRosa Growth Management Department Growth Management Operations Support Raquel Ovares Growth Management Department Lorraine Lantz Additional Reviewer Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Growth Management Department Lorraine Lantz Growth Management Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 12/23/2021 4:25 PM Additional Reviewer Completed Skipped 01/04/2022 10:27 AM Completed 01/05/2022 11:42 AM Skipped 12/21/2021 8:04 AM Completed 01/13/2022 5:08 PM Completed 01/14/2022 8:15 AM Completed 01/14/2022 10:49 AM Completed 01/15/2022 1:11 PM Completed 01/19/2022 11:24 AM 01/25/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 840 Jacobs Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road January 2022 Co le-r CO-WIty Growth Management Department Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Contents Acronymsand Abbreviations.............................................................................................................................................. v 1. Project Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Overview...............................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Project Planning History..................................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Project Purpose and Need..............................................................................................................................1-4 1.3.1 Capacity Need...................................................................................................................................1-4 1.3.2 System Connectivity Need.............................................................................................................1-4 1.3.3 Additional Project Goals.................................................................................................................1-5 1.4 Alternatives Development..............................................................................................................................1-6 1.5 No -Build Alternative.........................................................................................................................................1-7 2. Existing Conditions............................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Existing Roadway and Traffic Conditions....................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Traffic Characteristics......................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Roadway/Functional Classification..............................................................................................2-1 2.1.3 Roadway Typical Section................................................................................................................2-2 2.1.4 Existing Area Transit........................................................................................................................2-3 2.1.5 Horizontal and Vertical Alignment...............................................................................................2-4 2.1.6 Drainage and Hydrology.................................................................................................................2-4 2.1.7 Geotechnical......................................................................................................................................2-6 2.1.8 Crash Data..........................................................................................................................................2-6 2.1.9 Intersection Layout..........................................................................................................................2-8 2.1.10 Major Intersections.........................................................................................................................2-8 2.1.11 Lighting............................................................................................................................................2-10 2.1.12 Existing Structures........................................................................................................................2-10 2.2 Existing Environmental Resources............................................................................................................. 2-11 2.2.1 Social Environment.......................................................................................................................2-11 2.2.2 Natural Environment....................................................................................................................2-17 2.2.3 Physical Environment...................................................................................................................2-19 3. Future Conditions..............................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Future Land Use................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Project Traffic.....................................................................................................................................................3-1 4. Design Controls and Criteria............................................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Roadway Design Criteria.................................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Drainage Criteria...............................................................................................................................................4-2 4.2.1 Water Quantity Criteria..................................................................................................................4-2 5. Alternatives Analysis........................................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Initial Alternatives Analysis............................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Viable Alternative.............................................................................................................................................5-4 5.2.1 Transportation System Management and Operations...........................................................5-4 5.3 Build Alternative...............................................................................................................................................5-4 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 6. Design Features of the Recommended Alternative......................................................................................6-1 6.1 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry................................................................................................................6-1 6.2 Intersection Concepts......................................................................................................................................6-1 6.2.1 Proposed Golden Gate Boulevard Intersection Improvements...........................................6-1 6.2.2 Proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Intersection Improvements .........................6-2 6.2.3 Proposed Immokalee Road Intersection Improvements.......................................................6-3 6.2.4 Proposed Minor Intersection Improvements...........................................................................6-4 6.3 Bridge Analysis...................................................................................................................................................6-5 6.4 Proposed Access Management Changes....................................................................................................6-5 6.5 Variations and Exceptions..............................................................................................................................6-7 6.6 Right-of-Way......................................................................................................................................................6-7 6.7 Multimodal Accommodations.......................................................................................................................6-7 6.8 Preliminary Drainage Analysis.......................................................................................................................6-7 6.9 Floodplain Analysis...........................................................................................................................................6-8 6.10 Cost Estimates...................................................................................................................................................6-8 6.11 Summary of Environmental Impacts of the Recommended Alternative............................................6-8 6.11.1 Social Resources...............................................................................................................................6-9 6.11.2 Cultural Resources...........................................................................................................................6-9 6.11.3 Natural Resources.........................................................................................................................6-10 6.11.4 Physical Resources........................................................................................................................6-14 7. Public Involvement...........................................................................................................................................7-1 7.1 Project Website.................................................................................................................................................7-1 7.2 Public Input Summary......................................................................................................................................7-1 7.2.1 Public Information Meeting Summary........................................................................................7-1 8. References .........................................................................................................................................................8-1 Appendixes Appendix A Preliminary Concept Plans Appendix B Preliminary Geotechnical Report Appendix C Natural Resources Data Appendix D Utilities (Sunshine One Call Ticket) Appendix E Pond Siting Report Appendix F Initial Alternatives Evaluation Table Appendix G Proposed New Bridge Typical Section, Concept Plan, and Elevations Appendix H Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Appendix I Public Involvement Backup Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Tables Table 1-1. Alternatives Comparison...............................................................................................................................1-7 Table 2-1. Existing Traffic Characteristics......................................................................................................................2-1 Table 2-2. Existing Roadway Classifications..................................................................................................................2-2 Table 2-3. Existing Bus Stop Features............................................................................................................................2-3 Table 2-4. Total Crashes (2015-2019) By Location.......................................................................................................2-6 Table 2-5. Crash Severity (2015-2019) Type and Location..........................................................................................2-6 Table 2-6. Community Focal Points............................................................................................................................. 2-13 Table 2-7. Study Area Block Groups 2015-2019 ACS Census Data.......................................................................... 2-14 Table 2-8. Existing NRCS Soil Types within 250 Feet of the Study Area.................................................................. 2-17 Table2-9. Contamination Sites.................................................................................................................................... 2-23 Table 2-10. Utility Agency Owner Summary.............................................................................................................. 2-25 Table 3-1. 2045 No -Build and Build Traffic Volumes....................................................................................................3-1 Table4-1. Design Criteria................................................................................................................................................4-1 Table 6-1. Preliminary Cost Estimate.............................................................................................................................6-8 Table 6-2. Potentially Occurring and Observed Listed Species in the Study Area and Potential Pond Sites...... 6-11 Figures Figure 1-1. Regional Location Map .................................. Figure 1-2. Project Location Map .................................... 1-2 1-3 Figure 1-3. Existing CAT Bus Stop at 14th Avenue NE and Wilson Boulevard...........................................................1-6 Figure 2-1. Existing Wilson Boulevard Typical Section (Looking North).....................................................................2-3 Figure 2-2. Existing CAT Routes and Bus Stops.............................................................................................................2-5 Figure 2-3. Heat Map of Crash Data (2015-2019) Along Project Corridor.................................................................2-7 Figure 2-4. Existing Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard Intersection.....................................................2-8 Figure 2-5. Existing Immokalee Road and Wilson Boulevard Intersection................................................................2-9 Figure 2-6. Planned Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and Wilson Boulevard Intersection...................................2-9 Figure 2-7. Existing Typical Minor Intersection (14th Street NW and Wilson Boulevard Intersection) .............. 2-10 Figure 2-8. Existing Two -Lane Bridge Typical Section............................................................................................... 2-11 Figure2-9. Existing Land Use....................................................................................................................................... 2-12 Figure2-10. Social Resource Map............................................................................................................................... 2-15 Figure2-11. Demographics Map.................................................................................................................................. 2-16 Figure2-12. Floodplains Map...................................................................................................................................... 2-20 Figure 2-13. Species and Habitat Map........................................................................................................................ 2-21 Figure 2-14. Species and Habitat Map - Florida Panther.......................................................................................... 2-22 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Figure 2-15. Contamination Sites Map....................................................................................................................... 2-24 Figure 2-16. Existing County Water Production Infrastructure Along Wilson Boulevard ..................................... 2-26 Figure3-1. Future Land Use............................................................................................................................................3-1 Figure5-1. Typical Section Options................................................................................................................................5-2 Figure 5-2. Build Alternative Typical Section (Right Offset)........................................................................................5-3 Figure 6-1. Proposed Concept of the Golden Gate Boulevard Intersection..............................................................6-2 Figure 6-2. Proposed Concept of the Planned Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Intersection..............................6-3 Figure 6-3. Proposed Concept of the Immokalee Road Intersection..........................................................................6-4 Figure 6-4. Proposed Concept of the Minor Intersections...........................................................................................6-5 Figure 6-5. Conceptual Layout for U-Turn Access.........................................................................................................6-6 Figure 6-6. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Intersection Access Management Changes...............6-6 Figure 7-1. Existing Problems with the Study Area......................................................................................................7-4 Figure 7-2. Landscaping Preferences Along the Study Area........................................................................................7-4 iv Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Acronyms and Abbreviations AADT Annual average daily traffic ADT Average Daily Traffic AUIR Annual Update and Inventory Report B&A Boarding and alighting BFE Base flood elevation CAT Collier Area Transit CCPS Collier County Public Schools cfs/acre cubic feet (foot) per second per acre CR County Road CRAS Cultural Resource Assessment Survey ERP Environmental Resource Permit EST Environmental Screening Tool F.A.C. Florida Administrative Code FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDM FDOT Design Manual FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FGB FDOT 2018 Florida Greenbook FLUCCS Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System FNAI Florida Natural Areas Inventory FWC Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FY fiscal year GIS geographic information system 1-75 Interstate 75 IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation LDC Land Development Code LOS level of service LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan mph mile(s) per hour MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization NRCS Natural Resource Conservation Service NWI National Wetlands Inventory PE preliminary engineering ROW right-of-way SFWMD South Florida Water Management District TIP Transportation Improvement Plan TN total nitrogen TSMO Transportation System Management and Operations UAO Utility Agency/Owner USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VBRX Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension v Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 1. Project Introduction 1.1 Project Overview Collier County initiated the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study (hereinafter, the "Study') to evaluate future corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard North (hereinafter, "Wilson Boulevard"), from Golden Gate Boulevard (County Road [CR] 876) to Immokalee Road (CR 846) to (approximately 3.7 miles in length), from a two- lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. Within the study limits, Wilson Boulevard is a two-lane roadway with 2-foot-wide shoulders in an existing roadway easement of approximately 100 feet. The project is located in northern unincorporated Collier County, east of Interstate 75 (1-75). Figure 1-1 presents the Regional Location Map. To accommodate the transition from the existing two-lane facility to a four -lane facility, the project limits for the Study extended from just south of Golden Gate Boulevard to just north of Immokalee Road. Figure 1-2 presents a Project Location Map. The Study involves the evaluation of alternatives to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. To prioritize safety, comfort, and access to destinations for all people who use Wilson Boulevard, a Complete Streets approach was used to develop the proposed improvements, including the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes, as well as enhancing the existing bus stops. Additional project elements include changes to access along the project corridor, upgrades to the drainage system, replacement of the existing bridge over Cypress Canal, coordination of potential utility relocations, and acquisition of right-of-way (ROW). 1.2 Project Planning History The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Collier County Transportation Planning section have been planning the widening of Wilson Boulevard for many years. Past planning activities, including funding, are as follows: Collier MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) —Adopted December 2010 — Listed in the Needs Plan Collier MPO 2040 LRTP — Adopted December 2015, Amended April 2018 — Listed in the Needs Plan — Listed in the Cost Feasible Plan as follows: • 2021-2025: $2.85 million for Preliminary Engineering (PE) • 2026-2030: $21.47 million for ROW Acquisition • 2031-2040: $44.63 million in Construction ■ Collier MPO 2045 LRTP —Adopted December 2020 — Listed in the Existing Plus Committed Projects Collier MPO 2020 — 2025 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) — Adopted June 2020 — Fiscal Year (FY) 2020: $2 million for Advanced Construction — FY 2021: $10 million for PE and ROW Acquisition — FY 2022: $10 million for Construction Collier County 2022 5-Year Work Program — Adopted November 20211 — FY 2022: $1M for design and ROW — FY 2023: $1M for design and ROW — FY 2024: $21.8M for construction https://col I i e rco u ntyred es ign. prod.gova ccess. org/home/sh owpu b I i sh ed doc u ment/98467/637723267086830000 1-1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study HENDRY COUNTY 82� COLLIER COUNTY I Immokalee - corkscre Corkscrew Swam City of Regional San uary Bonita Ecosystem Watershed Bird Springs Rooke m Ave 29 Swamp a Maria -� EEcouNTv c Orang tree m oR weLL Ro IMMORALEE RU m i North e HENDRYCOUNTY Naples GOLDEN GAT CORRIDOR courERcouNTY 41 e ®w STUDY AREA _ - Florida Panther J Golden National Wildlife Gate_ Refuge ® LZ� 93 AL ATOR ALLEY 84 City of + Naples o Picayune 29 $ Strand State Forest Fakahatchee Strand Preserve collier- State Big Cypress 951 Sergfinole Park National Preserve — City of Sti Par Ten 41 Marco m Thousan Island Islands National 1 90 Wildlife Refuge q Ever lades Gulf of Mexico ity N wE Everglades tional Park COLLIER COUNTY g MONROE COUNTY Not to Scale Figure 1-1. Regional Location Map 1-2 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study ' Valencia & Country Golf Club o o TwinEagles 3 Golf Club - m m - �o o p:r75th AVE NW , J �► s Randall BLVD CanaV E Cocahatchee Immokalee RD 24th AVE NW 24ih AVE NE O 22nd AVE NW 22nd AVE NE A � � 42 J f° 20th AVE NW ID 20th AVE NE_ U 18thAVE NW ` U 98th AVE NE m Jun BLVD E m r Jung BLVD W U 16th AVE NW 16ih AVE NE V U 14th AVE NW � 141h AVE NE 121h AVE NW 12th AVE NE Olde Florida I Golf Club loth AVE NW 10th AVE NE Golden Gate Main Canal Cypress Canal 7i 2i }i z zi z z z Z Z Z Z'd Z z z z c7 LU z Z Z_ `� z z z z 3.z z z z Z r. F r- F F F to N a U F N '2 r2 N N � Golden Gate BL D W Golden Gate BL D E — County Road Golf Course — Local Road ^^ Study Limits 0 0.2 0.5 0.7q 1 Canal 0 Study Area Ak�— Iles. Water Body Figure 1-2. Project Location Map 1-3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Additionally, the Collier County 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR),2 which is an annual process for collecting, organizing, and publishing a summary report illustrating the approved County significant infrastructure needs, includes $32.9 million for the project's PE, ROW acquisition, and construction phases from FY 2021 to FY 2026. 1.3 Project Purpose and Need The primary purpose of the Wilson Boulevard widening project is to evaluate alternatives to address future traffic congestion and lack of system connectivity in the Golden Gate Estates and eastern Collier County areas. The project is needed to increase capacity along Wilson Boulevard and to improve overall traffic circulation and connectivity in the Golden Gate Estates and eastern Collier County areas. The following sections detail the project needs and additional project goals. Appendix A includes the Preliminary Concept Plans. 1.3.1 Capacity Need The project is needed to relieve estimated future traffic congestion along Wilson Boulevard, particularly between Immokalee Road and the future Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBRX). While Wilson Boulevard currently operates at an acceptable level of service (LOS), the 2021 AUIR notes that Wilson Boulevard experienced a 10 to 20% increase in peak hour directional traffic volume since 2020. Further, preliminary traffic modeling indicates that, without the proposed improvements, Wilson Boulevard will be failing by 2045 between the future VBRX and Immokalee Road. The future VBRX project widens (from two lanes to six lanes) and extends Vanderbilt Beach Road from Collier Boulevard (also known as CR 951) to 16th Street Northeast and crosses Wilson Boulevard within the project limits (construction of VBRX is estimated to be complete by 2024). The VBRX project provides additional east -west connectivity and capacity in eastern Collier County and Golden Gate Estates area. VBRX is expected to help relieve traffic congestion in the area, particularly along Golden Gate Boulevard and the already congested Immokalee Road, which is a regional east -west facility that carries traffic from eastern Collier County to I-75 and Naples. However, when the VBRX project is complete, traffic along Wilson Boulevard is expected to increase as travelers use the facility to access VBRX as an alternative east -west route in the area. 1.3.2 System Connectivity Need The project is needed to improve the overall traffic network and system connectivity in the Golden Gate Estates and eastern Collier County area. Mobility in eastern Collier County is constrained by conservation lands in the northeastern and southeastern parts of the County. The area also is constrained by a canal system (South Florida Water Management District [SFWMD] Golden Gate Canal Basin) created in Collier County during the 1960s to drain the lands for residential development. The development resulted in residential lots that are 1 to 5 acres in size and are connected by a coarse grid of roads with few connecting cross streets, and a canal system that traverses the residential grid. Most of the roadways in eastern Collier County and Golden Gate Estates dead end at the canals, reducing overall mobility in the area. Additionally, there are no north -south roadways east of Collier Boulevard that are wider than two lanes in eastern Collier County today. Wilson Boulevard would be the first four -lane roadway east of Collier Boulevard (approximately 5 miles to the east), and will provide additional north -south capacity and connectivity in the area. This project is part of an overall plan to improve system connectivity in eastern Collier County that includes the planned VBRX project, and other committed projects such as the widening of Randall Boulevard to the east, extending VBRX farther east from 16th Street Northeast to Everglades Boulevard, and widening Collier Boulevard south from the Golden Gate Main Canal to Green Boulevard, as well as the construction of multiple bridges to connect dead-end roadways over the canals east of Collier Boulevard. 2 https://www.colIiercountyfl.gov/home/showpubiisheddocu ment/98467/637723267086830000 1-4 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 1.3.3 Additional Project Goals The widening of Wilson Boulevard provides an opportunity to provide additional enhancements and improve- ments in the area. Additional project goals include enhancing safety and emergency access and improving overall multimodal mobility in the area. 1.3.3.1 Enhancing Safety A preliminary review of crash data indicates the highest crash locations within the study area were at the two major intersections, Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road. Additionally, no lighting exists along the project corridor. Safety enhancements proposed include lighting at the intersections and cross streets or along the entire project limits to improve nighttime visibility for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. There are no bicycle lanes or sidewalks along Wilson Boulevard within the project limits, forcing bicyclists and pedestrians, along with transit users, to share the road shoulder with motorists. The proposed improvements are anticipated to increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety by adding sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes to reduce conflicts between motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. Further, the improvements include the addition of a raised median and turning lanes at cross streets along Wilson Boulevard to help reduce conflict points associated with left turns from residential properties and businesses along the project corridor, and to reduce conflict points at the intersections. 1.3.3.2 Enhancing Emergency Access An increasing number of residents in northeastern Collier County are in a relatively isolated area of Collier County and have a limited network for emergency evacuations related to hurricanes and brush fires. The proposed improvements provide additional capacity for emergency evacuations. Further, the proposed improvements will improve north -south mobility and connectivity along the project corridor, enhancing access and reducing travel time for emergency responders. 1.3.3.3 Improving Multimodal Mobility Three Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus routes run along the project corridor (Routes 19, 22, and 28), served by six bus stops. The lack of sidewalks and bike lanes along the project corridor, as well as the lack of bus stop pads, make transit use in the area challenging. Figure 1-3 presents a typical bus stop within the project limits. The addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, bicycle lanes, and bus stop pads will provide a quality experience that promotes walking, bicycling, and transit use within the project area. Additionally, within the project limits, Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard include pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and similar facilities are planned as part of the VBRX project. The addition of pedestrian and bicycle facilities on Wilson Boulevard will improve connectivity and allow for improved multimodal mobility from Wilson Boulevard to other major facilities in the area. 1-5 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Figure 1-3. Existing CAT Bus Stop at 14th Avenue NE and Wilson Boulevard 1.4 Alternatives Development Alternatives considered as part of this Study include the No -Build Alternative, three initial alternatives, and one viable alternative. Primary constraints along the project corridor include numerous residential properties and driveways, non-residential properties, and multiple Collier County Public Utilities water supply production wells and associated infrastructure. A typical section analysis was initially performed by evaluating various typical section options ranging in widths between 160 feet and 200 feet. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the typical section options were performed and included review of potential impacts to existing residential and non-residential properties, as well as the existing County production wells. These analyses resulted in a recommended typical section width of 165 feet, which provided the least amount of impacts while meeting design criteria. Three initial alternatives then were developed using the recommended typical section of 165 feet, and applying its centerline to three alignments that were left, center, and right of the existing roadway easement centerline. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed on the initial alternatives. Coordination with the County revealed that the production wells are some of the highest -producing wells in the system, and the County requested that the production wells not be impacted. Of the three initial alternatives, the alternative that was to the right of the existing roadway easement centerline (or right offset) provided the least impacts and was advanced as the project's viable alternative. The viable alternative was further refined during the Study as the Build Alternative. The Build Alternative was presented at the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study Public Meeting on October 27, 2021, for public review and comment, along with the No -Build Alternative. The No -Build Alternative serves as a baseline for comparison with the Build Alternative and remained an alternative throughout the Study. Table 1-1 provides a comparison between the No -Build Alternative and the Build Alternative. 1-6 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 1-1. Alternatives Comparison Evaluation Criteria No -Build Build Alternative Alternative ROW Impacts (Acres) 0 29 Total Parcels Impacted (No.) 0 212 Residential Parcel Impacts (No.) 0 134 Non -Residential Parcel Impacts (No.) 0 11 Potential Wetland Impacts (Acres) 0 5 Potential Panther Secondary Impacts (Acres) 0 17 Potential Contamination Risk Sites (No. of 0 4 Sites) Potential Residential or Business 0 0 Displacements (No.) Improves Capacity No Benefit Provides additional capacity to address future traffic demand Improves System Connectivity No Benefit Provides additional system connectivity to the transportation network, and acts as a parallel reliever to Collier Blvd. Enhances Safety No Benefit Provides pedestrian/bicycle facilities to reduce conflicts between motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users; provides a raised median and turning lanes at cross streets along Wilson Blvd. to help reduce conflict points associated with left turns from residential properties and businesses along the project corridor, and to reduce conflict points at the intersections; provides lighting at the intersections Enhances Emergency Evacuation No Benefit Provides additional capacity for emergency evacuations; reduces travel time for emergency responders Improves Multimodal Mobility No Benefit Provides sidewalks, bike lanes, and a shared -use path that will connect to similar facilities at major intersections in the area; shared -use path and bus stop concrete pads make walking, biking, and transit use more desirable Total Construction Costs (2021 dollars) $0 $51.44 million Note: Impacts for pond sites not included. 1.5 No -Build Alternative The No -Build Alternative for this Study includes transportation facilities that are likely to exist by 2045 (as identified in the Collier MPO TIP), with the exception of this project. The No -Build Alternative would avoid ROW and construction costs associated with the proposed improvements; eliminate the short-term disruption that would occur along the existing roadways during construction activities; and prevent impacts to residential and non-residential properties, natural resources, and the County water supply production wells and associated infrastructure. However, the No -Build Alternative does not fulfill the purpose and need of the project. The 1-7 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study disadvantage of the No -Build Alternative is that there would be no provision to accommodate the anticipated growth in traffic volumes along Wilson Boulevard. Further, the No -Build Alternative does not improve connectivity to the overall transportation system in eastern Collier County and Golden Gate Estates. The No -Build Alternative does not provide enhancements or other improvements like increased safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorists, faster emergency response times, or improved multimodal mobility. 1-8 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2. Existing Conditions Existing conditions are documented in this section to identify engineering and environmental conditions along the project corridor. Desktop data collection and research for this Study generally extends 500 feet from the centerline of Wilson Boulevard. Field reviews were performed in August and October 2021 to verify desktop data. 2.1 Existing Roadway and Traffic Conditions This section summarizes the existing roads and associated traffic conditions within the project study area. 2.1.1 Traffic Characteristics Collier County's 2021 AUIR on Public Facilities reports existing and projected deficiencies for all County roadways. The existing traffic characteristics along the project corridor are presented in Table 2-1. Within the project limits, Wilson Boulevard currently meets the County's minimum level of service (LOS D) for this facility.3 However, there was an increase in directional volume of 10 to 20% from 2020 to 2021. Table 2-1. Existing Traffic Characteristics Change in 2021 Peak Hour Directional Peak Minimum Peak Directional Volume (from Road From To Direction Standard LOS Volume (vph) 2020 to 2021) Wilson Blvd. Immokalee Rd. Golden Gate Blvd. South D 420 10 to 20% vph = vehicles per hour 2.1.2 Roadway/Functional Classification Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road, is a two-lane undivided roadway. All roadways within the project study area are owned and maintained by Collier County. Table 2-2 lists the functional classifi- cations and additional characteristics for roadways within the project study area. The functional classifications are based on Collier County's current Growth Management Plan Transportation Element 3 (amended June 13, 2017). The County Growth Management Plan also notes (based on Transportation Element 7) that Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard are Collier County designated Hurricane Evacuation Routes. Further, the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP identified Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard as Freight Distribution Routes. Based on review of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Context Classification Guide, Wilson Boulevard's context classifica- tion is defined as C-2 Rural' The context classification is used to evaluate design criteria and ensure harmonization with the surrounding land use and characteristics intended for the roadway. Level of service (LOS) is a mechanism used to determine how well a transportation facility is operating from a traveler's perspective. Typically, six levels of service are defined and each is assigned a letter designation from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. https://fd otwww. b I ob. co re.wi n dows. n et/s itefi n ity/docs/defa u It -sou rce/roa dway/co m pI etestreets/fi les/fd ot-context-cl assification. pdf 2-1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 2-2. Existing Roadway Classifications Road Classification Additional Characteristics Wilson Blvd. Major Collector Golden Gate Blvd. Minor Collector Hurricane Evacuation Route Freight Distribution Route 10th Ave. NW/10th Ave. NE Local Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Planned Extension) Major Collector 12th Ave. NW/12th Ave. NE Local 14th Ave. NW/14th Ave. NE Local 16th Ave. NW/16th Ave. NE Local Jung Blvd. W/Jung Blvd. E Local 18th Ave. NW/18th Ave. NE Local 20th Ave. NW/20th Ave. NE Local 22nd Ave. NW/22nd Ave. NE Local 24th Ave. NW/24th Ave. NE Local Immokalee Rd. Minor Arterial Hurricane Evacuation Route Freight Distribution Route Source: Collier County Growth Management Plan Transportation Element 3 and 7 (amended June 13, 2017) 2.1.3 Roadway Typical Section Wilson Boulevard within the project limits is an undivided two-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph). Based on recorded plats for Golden Gate Estates within the project limits, the properties adjacent to Wilson Boulevard (east and west) each have an existing 50-foot-wide ROW easement, for a total existing ROW easement of 100 feet. The existing roadway includes two 11-foot-wide travel lanes (one in each direction) with approximate 2.5-foot-wide shoulders. No pedestrian or bicycle facilities exist along the project corridor. Figure 2-1 presents the existing typical section on Wilson Boulevard (looking north). 2-2 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study H z LU 2 W U) d LU 4 u. 0 H X �7 Z H X LU varies V I Varian G5' - 58' 2'-8" 22' 2'-S" i &' - i$' EXISTING WRIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT EXISTING WRIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT Figure 2-1. Existing Wilson Boulevard Typical Section (Looking North) 2.1.4 Existing Area Transit There are three CAT routes that serve the study area: ■ Route 19: Golden Gate Estates — Immokalee ■ Route 22: Immokalee Circulator ■ Route 28: Golden Gate Estates — Oil Well — Immokalee z w 2 w d W d I 0 rr 0 2 H N X W Six CAT bus stops are located along the project corridor. Figure 2-2 presents the existing transit routes and bus stops within the project limits. Because of the lack of pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project limits, walking and biking is challenging and requires sharing the road shoulder with motorists. There is an additional bus stop located on the west side of Wilson Boulevard, approximately 600 feet south of the intersection with Golden Gate Boulevard. This stop was constructed by CAT, but serves the Collier County Public Schools (CCPS) system and is not a CAT transit stop. Table 2-3 summarizes existing bus stop amenities along the project corridor. Table 2-3. Existing Bus Stop Features Bus Entity Stop Serving ID Location Along Wilson Blvd. Direction Serving Amenities CAT 279 North of Golden Gate Blvd. E Northbound Boarding and alighting (B&A) pad, shelter bench, trash can, bike rack, and sign CAT 280 South of 24th Ave. NE Northbound Sign and trash can CAT 289 North of 24th Ave. NW Southbound Sign CAT 290 North of Golden Gate Blvd. W Southbound B&A pad, shelter bench, trash can, bike rack, and sign CAT 675 North of 14th Ave. NE Northbound Sign 2-3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 2-3. Existing Bus Stop Features Bus Entity Stop Serving ID Location Along Wilson Blvd. Direction Serving Amenities CAT 676 South of 14th Ave. NW Southbound Sign CCPS Approx. 600 feet south of Golden Southbound Shelter with bench, bike rack, and trash can Gate Blvd. W 2.1.5 Horizontal and Vertical Alignment There are no deficiencies in the existing horizontal or vertical geometry within the study limits. Collier County elevation generally is flat, with slight elevation changes especially within the project limits. All the roadways in the study area generally are straight and flat with no horizontal or vertical curves. The alignments for the roadway widening are evaluated against present-day criteria for a design speed of 45 mph. No as -built plans are available for the existing roadway grades; however, the existing vertical alignment does not have any vertical curves and is a flat urban section. 2.1.6 Drainage and Hydrology The project study area is located within the jurisdiction of the SFWMD within the Big Cypress Basin. The surface hydrology within the Big Cypress Basin is shaped by a system of drainage canals and structures. The study area is within the major basins of the Golden Gate Canal and Faka Union Canal. In the 1960s, both basins were created to drain the lands for residential development. The Wilson Boulevard corridor drains to the Cypress and Corkscrew Canals within the North Golden Gate Basin, WBID 3278S. The preliminary design of stormwater management systems for this project is regulated by the rules and criteria set forth by SFWMD and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Generally, stormwater runoff from the existing Wilson Boulevard is conveyed by parallel roadside ditches along the west and east sides of the road that ultimately discharge to the nearby canals, directly or via side streets. Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to the Cypress Canal, is within the Curry Island Drain sub -basin and generally drains north to the Cypress Canal. North of the Cypress Canal to Immokalee Road, Wilson Boulevard is located along the boundary between two sub -basins, Horsepen Slough (to Corkscrew Canal) to the east, and Curry Island Drain (to Curry Canal) to the west. Wilson Boulevard is approximately 1 mile east of Curry Canal and % of a mile west of Corkscrew Canal. In this segment, Wilson Boulevard is traversed by nine side streets (10th Avenue to 24th Avenue) that extend east and west, terminating at the Curry and Corkscrew Canals, respectively. Because there are no existing side drains at the traversing side streets that would continue conveyance along Wilson Boulevard north -south, each side street crossing serves as a natural drainage divide and discharge point. 2-4 o Twi n Eag le" m Golf Club a =� v 2&th AVE rW —— � —24th AVE NW -A«Ii�i.l�Iii �j I�22nd AVE NW r_ ... l � Mh AV .N - - - Blh AVE NW r ,Jung BLVD 16th AVE NW ■_ � Ii —I AVE NW j. Oldc FloridaTL�Ip� aGolf Club AVE Nw t I I r - r -z r z z z r Golden to BL D W Transit Routes Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Valencia Golf & Country Club I' 2411h AVE NE 22nd AVE NE z 18th AVE NE J m Jung BLVD E -!F. 16th AVE NE z z z z z z z z z ME I LJ —.Y n"a 28 Golden Gate Estates-OilWell-Immokalee cotter Co., Local Road Golf Course Om Bus Stops _ _ 19 Golden Gate Estates - Immokalee 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 FOOT, Canal Parcel . ■ 22 Immokalee Circulator Miles FGDL Figure 2-2. Existing CAT Routes and Bus Stops 2-5 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2.1.7 Geotechnical A preliminary geotechnical investigation was performed with two Standard Penetration Test borings for the proposed new bridge, one at each side of the structure. The purpose of the geotechnical investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions within the general vicinity of the proposed new bridge to characterize the general subsurface stratigraphy and provide geotechnical recommendations to guide the design and construction. The Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report for the proposed Wilson Boulevard over the Cypress Canal bridge replacement is included in Appendix B. 2.1.8 Crash Data Five years of crash data (2015 to 2019) from the Collier County Crash Data Management System were collected along Wilson Boulevard between Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard. A preliminary review of the data indicates there were a total of 253 crashes with 86 injuries. A total of 8 of the 86 injuries (or nearly 10%) were considered incapacitating. Two crashes involving a pedestrian and one crash involving a bicycle also were docu- mented. No fatalities were reported during this time period. The crash data also indicated that 82 of the 253 crashes occurred at night. Table 2-4 summarizes the total crashes at various locations. Table 2-5 summarizes the severity of reported injuries. Table 2-4. Total Crashes (2015-2019) By Location Location Total Crashes Intersection of Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd. 103 Intersection of Immokalee Rd. and Wilson Blvd. 105 Wilson Blvd. Project Corridor 45 Total 253 Table 2-5. Crash Severity (2015-2019) Type and Location Severity Location Total Wilson Blvd. Immokalee Rd. Golden Gate Blvd Incapacitating Injury 2 2 4 8 Minor Injury 5 9 9 23 Possible Injury 6 32 17 55 No Injury 34 79 82 195 Total 47 122 112 281 The crash data were reported with the following characteristics: ■ 122 crashes were reported as aggressive driving ■ 88 crashes were reported as intersection related ■ 82 crashes were reported as nighttime crashes, with 21 indicated as no lighting ■ 47 crashes were reported as distracted driving ■ 44 crashes were reported as lane departure Figure 2-3 presents a visual representation of the crash data along the project corridor in the form of a heat map. The highest crash locations were at the two major intersections, Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road. A safety analysis of crash data is recommended during the design phase to better evaluate access management and safety improvements. 2-6 o ` e T%inEag'les Gtglf Club 32 s Co Immovalee I3D o � ro m F- U mo Olde Florida Golf Club ftd=-6 aa Valencia Golf & Country Club Randall - d - V Z f~l] Z NCh Z InN Z Z N r Z z N Z L Z t Z a Z U) V Z I-- t Z N t Z (~I1 r m C N t Z N Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study NE NE NE - County Road Crash Density (All types) Local Road I Sparse Canal Water Body Dense Golf Course ilE Bicycle Crashes 0.75 1 Miles _ Q Study Area Pedestrian Crashes Figure 2-3. Heat Map of Crash Data (2015-2019) Along Project Corridor 2-7 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2.1.9 Intersection Layout Two major intersections and nine minor intersections are located in the study area. The basic geometric layouts of the existing intersections within the project study area are described in this section. Wilson Boulevard marks the directional name designation in the roadway names for Golden Gate Boulevard and for each of the minor inter- sections as east or west. Golden Gate Boulevard marks the direction change for Wilson Boulevard, as north or south. For example, 10th Avenue west of Wilson Boulevard is 10th Avenue Northwest, while 10th Avenue east of Wilson Boulevard is 10th Avenue Northeast. 2.1.10 Major Intersections Currently, two major intersections are located within the study area, Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road, with one planned major intersection, VBRX, which is anticipated to be constructed by 2024. Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard form a four -leg intersection with all movements controlled by a traffic signal (Figure 2-4). All legs of the intersection include one left -turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane for northbound traffic, one shared through/left-turn lane and one right -turn lane for southbound traffic, and one left - turn lane, one right -turn lane, and two through lanes for eastbound and westbound traffic. Crosswalks are located at all legs of the intersection and are controlled by the traffic signal. Figure 2-4. Existing Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard Intersection Immokalee Road and Wilson Boulevard form a four -leg intersection with all movements controlled by a traffic signal, as shown in Figure 2-5. All legs of the intersection include one left -turn lane, one right -turn lane, and three through lanes for both eastbound and westbound traffic, and one shared through/left-turn lane and one right -turn lane for northbound and southbound traffic. Crosswalks are located at all legs of the intersection and are controlled by the traffic signal. 2-8 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Figure 2-5. Existing Immokalee Road and Wilson Boulevard Intersection The planned VBRX and Wilson Boulevard intersection is proposed as a four -leg intersection with all movements controlled by a traffic signal. The east and west legs of the intersection will include one left -turn lane, one right - turn lane, and two through lanes. The north and south legs of the intersection will include two left -turn lanes, one right -turn lane, and one through lane. Crosswalks are planned at all legs of the intersection and are to be controlled by the traffic signal. Figure 2-6 presents the design plans for the intersection at the existing two-lane Wilson Boulevard. Figure 2-6. Planned Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and Wilson Boulevard Intersection 2.1.10.1 Minor Intersections There are nine minor intersections in the study area, between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road, with the cross streets (eastbound and westbound) controlled by stop signs. Figure 2-7 represents the typical geometric layout for each of the minor cross streets. Each intersection contains one lane for each direction. There are no marked crosswalks on the side streets. The minor intersections within the study area include: ■ 24th Avenue Northwest/24th Avenue Northeast 2-9 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study ■ 22nd Avenue Northwest/22nd Avenue Northeast ■ 20th Avenue Northwest/20th Avenue Northeast ■ 18th Avenue Northwest/18th Avenue Northeast ■ Jung Boulevard West/Jung Boulevard East ■ 16th Avenue Northwest/16th Avenue Northeast ■ 14th Avenue Northwest/14th Avenue Northeast ■ 12th Avenue Northwest/12th Avenue Northeast Figure 2-7. Existing Typical Minor Intersection (14th Street NW and Wilson Boulevard Intersection) 2.1.11 Lighting There is no lighting along the study corridor of Wilson Boulevard, with the exception of lighting at the major intersections of Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard. Lighting is planned for the future intersection of VBRX and Wilson Boulevard. 2.1.12 Existing Structures There is one existing bridge structure within the study area along Wilson Boulevard, Bridge No. 034032, which crosses the Cypress Canal, approximately 1.13 miles north of Golden Gate Boulevard. The bridge was constructed in 1960. According to the October 1, 2021, FDOT Florida Bridge Information Report, the last bridge inspection is dated April 7, 2021. The inspection noted a Sufficiency Rating of 76.2 and a Health Index of 96.44 for the existing bridge. The report also notes the average daily traffic (ADT) over the bridge is 1,500. The bridge is currently not posted for any weight restrictions as per the recent bridge inspection report and field observation. The bridge is approximately 28 feet wide (two 12-foot-wide travel lanes, one in each direction) and 58 feet long. Figure 2-8 depicts the typical section for the existing two-lane bridge. There are two 2-inch utility pipes attached to the east side of the deck fascia. Bridge railing consists of a raised curb and W-beam guardrail on either side. The bridge deck and approach slabs are overlaid with an asphalt wearing surface and no deck joints are visible. 2-10 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 12'-0,, 12'-0" Lane Lane 1�- Post and W-beam __------------- _ - Guardrail(Typ) -- --------- ---- - ---------- Figure 2-8. Existing Two -Lane Bridge Typical Section There is an existing box culvert/bridge over the Cocohatchee Canal at the Immokalee Road and Wilson Boulevard intersection. According to the Collier County Stormwater Management Facilities geographic information system (GIS) map (Structure ID CCB-001-50100), the bridge culvert is approximately 20.7 feet long and 105 feet wide, and was built in 2006, and reconstructed in 2009. According to the October 1, 2021, FDOT Florida Bridge Information Report (Bridge No. 094056), the last bridge inspection is dated April 7, 2020. The inspection noted a Sufficiency Rating of 60.77 and a Health Index of 50. for the existing bridge. The report also notes the ADT over the bridge is 1,556. 2.2 Existing Environmental Resources A desktop review of existing environmental resources — including social, cultural, natural, and physical resources — was performed to identify potential impacts resulting from the proposed improvements. The study area for environmental resources was defined as a 500-foot-wide buffer from the centerline of the existing roadway. Primary sources for data collection included FDOT's Environmental Screening Tool (EST) and the Florida Geographic Data Library. Other data sources are noted in the following respective sections. The following sections summarize the existing environmental resources within the study area. 2.2.1 Social Environment The sociocultural environment includes the social (human) and cultural environment. Land use, community facilities, socioeconomic characteristics, parks and recreation areas, archaeological and historical resources, and farmlands are included. 2.2.1.1 Land Use The study area existing land use is a mix of low -density residential, retail/office, public, and commercial uses (refer to Figure 2-9). The primary land use along Wilson Boulevard is low -density residential, where the residential driveways intersect Wilson Boulevard. Commercial land use is located at the southern end of the project limits. The cross streets in the study area that intersect Wilson Boulevard are dead ends due to the canals; therefore, the residents along these cross streets must use Wilson Boulevard to access their properties. 2-11 J 11 Olde Florida Golf Club I TwinEagle Golf Club I Golden Gate Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Valencia Golf R Country Clul 2411h AVE NE -- 20th AVE NE 18th AVE NE Jung BLVD E 1611hAVE NE 14th AVE NE it E. NE N ■1 -County Road Water Body -Project Limits -AGRICULTURAL !MINING RESIDENTIAL Source: --- Local Roads Canal Q Study Area - INDUSTRIAL - PUBLIC - RETAWOFFICE Collier Co., U 0.25 0.5 0.75 FOOT, Parcel Golf Course (� School - INSTITUTIONAL RECREATION VACANT Miles FGI Figure 2-9. Existing Land Use 2-12 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2.2.1.2 Community Focal Points Social resources within 2 miles of the project study area are presented in Table 2-6 and include emergency services, public schools, recreational areas and parks, grocery stores, transportation resources, and other community resources. The study area is also located within the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association. Figure 2-10 presents a map of the social resources within and surrounding the study area. Table 2-6. Community Focal Points Name Location Emergency Services North Collier Fire Rescue District Station #10 13240 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120 Greater Naples Fire Rescue— Station #71 100 13th Street SW, Naples, FL 34117 Public Schools Collier Charter Academy 12101 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120 Corkscrew Elementary School 1065 CR 858, Naples, FL 34120 Corkscrew Middle School 1165 CR 858, Naples, FL 34120 Recreational Areas and Parks Valencia Golf and Country Club (Public Golf Course) 1725 Double Eagle Trail, Naples, FL 34120 Twin Eagles Golf Club (Private) 11530 Aerie Court, Naples, FL 34120 Religious Centers Iglesia Pentecostes Alba De Peniel 13260 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120 Grocery Stores Publix Super Market at Neighborhood Shoppes of Orangetree 13550 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120 Sunshine Groceries 50 Wilson Blvd. S, Suite 1, Naples, FL 34117 Transportation Resources Route 19/22/28 — Bus Stop 289 North/Southbound Northwest corner of intersection — Wilson Blvd. and 24th Ave. Route 19/22/28 — Bus Stop 280 North/Southbound Southeast corner of intersection — Wilson Blvd. and 24th Ave. Route 19/22/28 — Bus Stop 675 North/Southbound Northeast corner of intersection — Wilson Blvd. and 14th Ave. NE Route 19/22/28 — Bus Stop 676 North/Southbound Southwest corner of intersection — Wilson Blvd. and 14th Ave. NW Route 19/22/28 — Bus Stop 279 North/Southbound Northeast corner of intersection — Wilson Blvd. and Golden Gate Blvd. Route 19/22/28 — Bus Stop 290 North/Southbound Northwest corner of intersection — Wilson Blvd. and Golden Gate Blvd. Other Community Resources Collier County Tax Collector 50 Wilson Blvd. S, Naples, FL 34120 2-13 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2.2.1.3 Socioeconomic Characteristics Demographic information was obtained from the United Census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Five Census Block Groups are within or near the project study area. Figure 2-11 presents the Block Group boundaries and associated demographic data. Table 2-7 summarizes the study area demographics and compares them to the overall demographics of Collier County. Demographic information indicates that all five Census Block Groups in the study area may include minority, limited -English-speaking, youth, and/or disabled populations greater than the average for Collier County. Based on demographic census data, populations with limited transportation mobility options may exist in the study area, reinforcing the need for bicycle, pedestrian, and transit mobility improvements. The higher percentage of youth and/or disabled populations indicates that the study area may serve a greater number of transit -dependent individuals. Table 2-7. Study Area Block Groups 2015-2019 ACS Census Data Census Tract Block Group Area (acres) % of Block Group in Study Area Total Population % Minority % Age 65 and Up % Below Poverty % Limited English ° Youth ° Disabled 010412 3 2,868 5.3% 2,417 55.3%a 12.41% 1.41% 10.1%a 13.5%a 4.0%a 010414 2 2,812 1.1% 2,775 36.0% 17.05% 10.09% 9.3% 14.3%a 1.9% 010414 3 2,237 1.3% 2,120 63.1%a 20.28% 7.17% 24.3%a 1.1% 0.80% 010412 1 7,127 3.6% 6,192 22.2% 30.86% 8.90% 3.6% 12.7%a 3.1% 011202 3 59,626 0.10% 9,972 50.6%a 25.00% 1.92% 2.2% 15.2%a 0.2% Collier County 4,097,304 N/A 393,670 36.7% 31.94% 10.98% 9.4% 12.7% 3.2% a Block Group demographic percentage is greater than that of Collier County. Notes: Limited English refers to the percentage of households with limited English-speaking status. Minority refers to the percentage of population that is non -white. Poverty refers to the percentage of population of whom poverty status is determined. Youth refers to the percentage of population under 18 years of age in households. Disability refers to the percentage of households with at least one disabled person. 2-14 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study TwinEagl m Golf Clul3 '6 7,5th VE NW Irnmokalee Rd 24th AVE NW .a t? -j m 1 iu 1 O" —_- 22nd AVE NW o m i w �'1 1 z_{ 20ih RVE NW � I AVE NW _ — O �i Jun BLVD W _.. � I � 16Eh AVE NW - 14th AVE NW 121h AVE NW Olde Florida{1t Golf Club 10th AVE NW I ZZ z yz z z z z z z f Gol en Gate BLVD W I Valencia & Country Golf Club Randall BLVD 241h AVE NE 22nd AVE NE V III 20th A ENE 18th AVE NE �..:—:a� I_Kip16ih Jung BLVD E illiklfith AVE N — i.t- -- 14th AVE NE �I 12th AVE NE . — J 10ih RIVE NEI z _ z Golden E z z; I z u z, ate BL — z — County Road Water Body © Study Area Bicycle Lane 0? Fire Station source: Collier Co., Local Road Golf Course — Study Limits — Sidewalk ® Government Building 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 FDOT, Canal Parcel Trails '; School Ak Religious Center Miles FGDL Figure 2-10. Social Resource Map 2-15 Census Tract: 011202 % Minority: 50.561h Block Group: 3 'A Age 65 and Up: 251A Population:59,626 % Bell Povedy:1,92% %at Black Group in Study 1I Limited English: 2.1914, Area: 0.06% %Youth: 15,22% Density: 0.17 % Disabled. 0.23% th AVE NW 4mmoka4ee RD 2,lth AVE NW 0 _ 22nd AVE NIN J � _ m h 26th AVE_NW a: Census Tract: 01 D412 Block Group: 1 _ Population. 5,192 18th AVE NW % of Black Group in Study Area. 3.56% Jung BLVD W Density: 0-87 % Minority: 22, 24% 16th AVE NW Age 65 and Up 30.86% % Below Paysrty: 8.90! % Limited EngEisFh 38% 141h AVE NW % Youth: 1P.7A% Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Valencia Golf & Country Club k - 22nd AVE NE 711 20th AVE NE IklIj111I / Cilde Florida Golf Club 10th AVE NVV _ lath NE4 AVE Census Tract: 010412 Block Group: 3 1 Population: 2,417- _ % of Block Group in Study -�_- - - - - �_- �I z i _ z z zl, z z Area: 5.25% Density :084 ui — - w ? w wi -- z F: z z $ ? z % Minonty: 55.28 % m in m rn N v]' N - %Age 65 and Up: f241% �.- o, ry t r _ I m �., e %Below Poverty: 1.41% - — _ % Limited English: 10.1% _ :. _� 'I Youth 13.49°/a - _ Disahled:4.01°k - T - _ - - - I ate 8 I i olden G to BLV I" E r Census Tract: 010414 Density. 0.99 % Limited English: 5. 33°I Census Tract: 010414 % Minority. 63.91`Yo %Youth. 1. 13% Block Group: 2 % Minority, 35.96% % Youth: 14.31 r6 Block Group: 3 %Age 65 and Up: % Disabled: 0.75 % . Population: 2,775 %Age 65 and Up. %Disabled: 1_1195 Population: 2,120 20.28% b of Block Group in 17.05 % _ _ % of Block Group in % Below Poverty: 7.17% Sludy Areas 1.13% %Below Poverty. 10.09% Study Area 1 34% 'Y Limited English �t -- - -F _ 7_. Der i :0.95 24291A : County Road Water Body Study Area N Source colNerC... Local Road Golf Course Q Census Block Group Boundary 0 0,25 0.5 0.75 1 FOOT, FGAL, Canal Parcel i Miles US Census B.- Figure 2-11. Demographics Map 2-16 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2.2.1.4 Historic and Archaeological Resources A review of the FDOT EST was used to identify potential archaeological and historic resources. There are two structures built between 1970 and 1980; however, both are single-family residences. No archaeological resources were identified in the FDOT EST. 2.2.2 Natural Environment The natural environment includes wetlands, floodplains, water quality, and listed species and their habitat. Natural resources were evaluated approximately 250 feet from the proposed project boundary to use the most conserva- tive project footprint along that segment. A desktop analysis and a brief visual field evaluation (October 1, 2021) of existing natural resources were performed within the study area and results are documented in this section. 2.2.2.1 Soils The soils surveys of Collier County, Florida, published by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) were reviewed for the project study area. According to the Soil Survey for Collier County (NRCS 2021), approximately 80 percent of the soils within a 250-foot-wide buffer zone of the study area are classified as state hydric. The most prevalent soils in the natural resources project boundary are Boca Fine Sand and Holopaw Fine Sand. Table 2-8 summarizes the existing NRCS soil types within 250 feet of the study area (excludes pond sites). The NRCS Soil Resource Report and soil maps of hydric soils in and around the project corridor are provided in Appendix C. Table 2-8. Existing NRCS Soil Types within 250 Feet of the Study Area Symbol Percent ID of Area Hydric Status Soil Type 102 25.9% Hydric Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 105 0.5% Hydric Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes 110 6.7% Non-hydric Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 113 23.8% Hydric Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 117 7.9% Non-hydric Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 120 0.7% Hydric Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 5.4% Non-hydric Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 128 14.0% Hydric Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 131 15.0% Hydric Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes 2.2.2.2 Wetlands and Other Surface Waters Wetlands were identified by reviewing available literature, the NRCS Soil Survey, GIS data, and a brief field evaluation. Note that the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) shapefile (updated December 2021) contains inconsistencies as compared to aerial imagery and recent soil data. Therefore, the NRCS Soil Survey, aerial imagery, and NWI data were used to better determine wetland and other surface water conditions. Following the review of all available materials, a field assessment was conducted on October 1, 2021, to identify the presence of wetland vegetation, evidence of hydrology, and hydric soil indicators. It is important to note the field assessment 2-17 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study was limited and only specific locations along the project boundary and potential pond sites were evaluated. Field notes and photos for the locations evaluated are provided in the Data Collection Package in Appendix C. Jurisdictional limits of wetlands were estimated using the criteria stated in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (USACE 2010), and Florida statewide unified wetland delineation methodology as adopted by FDEP and the Water Management Districts per Chapter 62-340 of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and described in The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual (FDEP 2016). Habitat and land use mapping (upland and wetland) was evaluated in accordance with the methodology set forth in the Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). The most prevalent jurisdictional wetland in the boundary anticipated is Cypress — Pine — Cabbage Palm (FLUCCS 624). Surface waters also were present in the project boundary, including major canals (FLUCCS 512). Per Chapter 62.600(D), F.A.C., boundaries of surface waters with slopes of 4 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) or steeper are estimated using the top of bank. The stormwater from the existing roadway drains to the following canals in the project area: Cypress Canal, Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, Cocohatchee Canal, and Golden Gate Main Canal. During the field visit, water was present in a segment of roadside ditches along Wilson Boulevard; however, the ditches along the property boundary typically are dry during the dry season. Based on review of available data, the study area contains minimal wetlands and surface waters. Because limited field evaluations were performed during this Study, all potential wetland areas within the project boundary and potential pond sites, as indicated by NWI, aerial imagery, and soil data, were not field -verified. Potential wetland areas, indicated by these data sources, were reduced based on recent field evaluations surrounding the project area and lack of hydrology found as a result of the canal systems. Therefore, additional field evaluation is needed during the design phase to confirm the lack of hydrology and classification of some potential wetland areas as indicated by NWI, aerial imagery, and soil data as upland areas. The preliminary FLUCCS maps are presented in Appendix C. 2.2.2.3 Water Quality Water quality (treatment) and water quantity (attenuation) criteria are based on SFWMD and FDOT stormwater regulations. The study area drains to the Cypress and Corkscrew Canals within the North Golden Gate Basin, which is in the Big Cypress area of Collier County and within the jurisdiction of the SFWMD. The North Golden Gate Sub - Basin is impaired for dissolved oxygen with total nitrogen (TN) designated as the causative pollutant. 2.2.2.4 Floodplains and Regulatory Floodways The Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Collier County, Florida, effective November 2005, indicates the study area is located within Zone AE and Zone AH of the 100-year floodplain (base flood elevation [BFE] ranges from EL 13 to EL 14 North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NAVD]) and Zone X500 of the 500-year floodplain. The Collier County flood zone definitions are as follows:5 ■ ZONE AE: Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event determined by detailed methods. BFEs are shown. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply. ■ ZONE AH: Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance shallow flooding (usually areas of ponding) where average depths are between 1 and 3 feet. BFEs derived from detailed hydraulic analyses are shown in this zone. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply. s https://www.colIiercountvfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=72402 2-18 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study ZONE X500 (SHADED): Zone X500 (shaded) is a moderate flood hazard area and is an area between the limits of the base flood and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance (or 500-year) flood. Mandatory flood insurance is not required. Figure 2-12 presents flood hazard areas within and surrounding the study area. 2.2.2.5 Protected Species and Habitat Literature reviews, agency database searches, and field reviews of potential habitat were conducted to identify state and federally protected species occurring or potentially occurring within the project area. The NRCS Soil Resource Report, recent aerial imagery (2021), and SFWMD land use/land cover mapping was reviewed to determine habitat types occurring within and adjacent to the project corridor. Land use/land cover mapping was updated to reflect the current field conditions. Additionally, FDOT's EST was used to identify U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Consultation Areas for protected species within the study area. The study area is within USFWS Consultations Areas for the following federally protected species: ■ Everglades snail kite ■ Florida bonneted bat ■ Red -cockaded woodpecker ■ Florida scrub -jay ■ Florida panther Figure 2-13 presents USFWS Consultation Areas, species, and habitat within the study area. Figure 2-14 presents the Florida panther data. Based on the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) website, a number of federal- and state -listed species have the potential to occur in the study area. Section 6 summarizes these species. The project study area falls within the Florida panther focus area secondary zone. 2.2.2.6 Conservation Lands There are no conservation lands within the study area. 2.2.2.7 Special Designations The project area does not traverse or discharge to any designated Outstanding Florida Water as defined in Chapter 62-302, F.A.C. All other waters traversed by this proposed study area have been designated Class III waters. Because the canals within the study area do not provide breeding or nursery area for marine fish species, no essential fish habitat occurs in the study area. 2.2.3 Physical Environment Physical resources include contamination sites, utilities, noise -sensitive sites, air quality, and railroads. Existing physical resources identified within the study area are documented in this section. 2-19 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Valencia Golf > ! r 4& Country Club TwinEa.l Randall BLVa 1 lmmokalee RO " n O Yf i .Y "s 24th AVE NE r 2-0th AVE N r -__—_ 9 .._ r+: 'T o a , Q 22nd AVE NW _ -_ 22nd AVE NE yj 20,ll?AVE NW 20th AVE NE_ =0' _ 181h AVE NW - y r 44, r -�'- 181h AVE NE _ }.--- — — '4. Jurry BLVD E Jung BLVt7 W _ 6th'AVE NW ►R II • 1r _ 161h AVE NE Kerr Island RD r. - ,...' .6 . 141h AVE NE 14th AVE NW 7 IL iFm 5� �•rr r °-'.7trna+f _'2[h AVENE 12th AVE NW _ OI>ie Florida' `a k}}+M�n r, a_ 1 Oth AVE NE oli lub IOthAVENw --- '`F - z z z z z z z z 9 S yr Golden Gaye BLV� E Local Road Water Body Q Studygrea 100-Year Floodplaln N Source, — Count Road Parcel — Study Limits 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 CollierC"., Y Y = 500-Year Floodplaln IIIIIIES FDOT, Canal Golf Course FGOL Figure 2-12. Floodplains Map 2-20 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study xx NO// / len/cia If -atCI Two �a If19lW//f / � t Randall BLVD Itnrnokalee RU Black Bear Road Mortality within study area: 1- Incident reported 2001 ()uvenile Male) 2 Incident reported 2001 (Juvenile Female) 0 J m A ® m 3 � F/m/ox P///// 0 d U 2 0 x 18th AVE N O Jung BLVi7 W 16th AVE N W 14th AVE NW 12th AVE NVV 1 Olde Florida Golf ClubI 0ih AVE NW 2 Notes: 1. The entire project limits and 500 foot buffer study area include the Everglades Snail Kite (2012), Bonneted Bat (2019) and Red Cockaded Woodpecker(2005) consultation areas. z z z z z Z z z z z w z w z r w z 2. No eagle nests or the F- � �, a w o associated 660 foot buffer were U) _ Es 4F m o44 documented within the limits of ° N this map, according to FWC (2017) and the Audubon Florida Eagle Watch Public Nest App 1(2021), olden G #9 BLVLP W I G )ldon G e BLVD 3. The entire project limits and 500 foot buffer study area include the Florida Wood Stork Core Foraging Area (2019).5/// 0//// m// 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1 Mies County Road Water Body Local Road Golf Course Canal - Study Limits 0 Study Area Threatened Bird Observations (2018) ® Crested Caracara ® Florida Scrub Jay ® Wood Stork Florida Scrub Jay Consultation Area (2016) source: DtCo. F07, Black Bear Road Mortality Locations FDO (1976-2020) FGSL Figure 2-13. Species and Habitat Map 2-21 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study r Valencia GgIf Club o TwinEagles'�' & Country Golf Club It AVE NW Randall BLVD r lmrrtokalee•RD —r� -I- 24th AV NW P41h AVE NE 0 22nd AVE NW j _ _ _ • 22nd AVE NE 2pth AVE N W o 201h AVE NE a m �m A , z 18th AVErW _ 18th AVE NE • o Jung BLVD W 16th AVE NW Jung BLVD E 1Bth AVE NE ' 141h AVE NW 14th WE HE 12th AVE NW , 12th AVE NE Olde Florida f Golf Club 10th AVE NW 10th AVE NE 3 z z 3 z z Z z z F r r r 3 z z z r r r z r ,� z z z �c L t z z z z z r F r r ~ f 1n L a N m` ry N c p m ' GoV en Gate olden G3taBLVr E N ' A f 0 0.25 0'5 0.75 Miles -County Road Water Body OS1udyArea Flonda Panther Focus Areas 1WFlorida Panther Mortalitv(2021) source: - Local Road Golf Course - Canal Study Limits Figure 2-14. Species and Habitat Map — Florida Panther Secondary Panther Zone (2017) Florida Panther Telemetry (2021) FOOT, FINS. FGDL 2-22 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2.2.3.1 Contamination A desktop review of the FDEP Contamination Locator Map and FDOT's EST indicates that there are nine potential contamination sites within the project study area. All three of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System sites in the study area have either expired or are no longer active. Note that some of the identified sources may overlap in categories. Table 2-9 summarizes the results of the desktop review. Figure 2-15 shows the approximate locations of the potential contamination sites in the study area. Table 2-9. Contamination Sites Contamination Site Type Quantity Facility Name Status Site Address Walgreens Active 30 Golden Gate Blvd. W, Naples, FL 34120 Biomedical Waste Site 2 Estates Dental Center Active 80 Wilson Blvd., Suite 12, Naples, FL 34117 Collier County Stormwater Terminated 26.22987147, -81.60670036 National Pollutant Discharge 3 Collier County ICIS-NPDES Terminated 26.22987147, Elimination System NON -MAJOR -81.60670036 7-Eleven Expired 23 Golden Gate Blvd. E, Naples, FL 34120 Petroleum Contamination 1 7 Eleven 21 Golden Gate Blvd. E, Monitoring Site Naples, FL 34120 SUPER Act Risk Source 1 G's General Store 21 Golden Gate Blvd., Naples, FL 34120 Harvey Bros Farms Closed 5500 12th Avenue NW, Storage Tank Contamination Naples, FL Monitoring Sites 2 21 Golden Gate Blvd. E, 7-Eleven Store Open Naples, FL 34120 Total 9 2-23 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Valencia Golf &Country Club TwinEagle If CY� Iu , � 75th IVE NW l F� 20ih AVE NE 18th AVE NE - - Jung BLVD E__ — - 16th AVE NE _ son Blvd and Blvd I ntersectlon Inset 14th AVE NE 12th AVE NE -- -- 10th AVE NE I'aT 'v m 1D 1.8th AVE NW o Jun BLVD W I 16th AVE NW _. Keri Island RD _ I � 4thAVE .N,- .Golden. Gate _ AVE' N� Olde Florida 11oth Golf Club , AVE NW _ z zz. Z. Z —_ H FZ- — � �_92 W G dent E Local Road Water Body — Study Limits Petroleum Contamination Monitoring Site :aunty Road Golf Course Q Study Area * Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring Site :anal Parcel p Biomedical Waste Site Q National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Figure 2-15. Contamination Sites Map w w z z �- rA 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 Miles SUPER Act Risk Source C.111e, Co., FDOT, FGDL. FDE4 2-24 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 2.2.3.2 Utilities The Utility Agency/Owners (UAOs) within the study area were identified from a Sunshine One Call design ticket and are summarized in Table 2-10. From this preliminary contact information, the UAOs were called to verify the contact information. Existing utilities along the study corridor were approximated by field observations, desktop analysis, and coordination with utility owners. Major utilities along Wilson Boulevard include a 24-inch-diameter raw water main, overhead transmission/electric, and gas. The Florida Power and Light distribution system runs along the east side of the roadway, and the raw water main and TECO gas lines run underground along the west side of the existing roadway easement. Within the study area is the County -owned and maintained 24-inch-diameter raw water main and eight water production wells along the west side of the Wilson Boulevard (Well Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 37). Three additional water production wells are located along the cross streets of 10th Avenue Northwest, 12th Avenue Northwest, and 14th Avenue Northwest (Well Nos. 31, 32, and 34). Well No. 9 is located outside the project limits. Figure 2-16 presents the existing County water production infrastructure. Coordination with Collier County staff revealed that these wells produce approximately 21% of the drinking water in Collier County. Existing and proposed utility information received by the UAOs are summarized in Appendix D. Note: TECO Gas is excluded from Appendix D to comply with confidentiality requirements. Table 2-10. Utility Agency Owner Summary Date Request Package Date Response Utility Agency/Owner Contact Person Sent Received Collier County Traffic Haris Domond September 14, 2021 No Response Received Operations Section Haris.Domond@colliercountvfl.gov Pam Wilson Pamela.Wilson@colliercountvfl.gov Collier County Joe Oliver September 14, 2021 No Response Received Information Technology Joseph.Oliver@colliercountvfl.gov Collier County Board of Pamela Lulich September 14, 2021 No Response Received County Commissioners pamelalulich@colliercountvfl.gov Road Maintenance Century Link Luis Negron September 14, 2021 September 21, 2021 Luis.C.Negron@Lumen.com September 21, 2021 City of Naples Water Alicia Acevedo September 14, 2021 No Response Received (239)213-4712 Collier County Stake & Eric Fey N/A during study phase Locates Eric. Fey@colliercountyfLgov Comcast Xavier Medina September 14, 2021 September 23, 2021 Xavier Medina@Comcast.net September 21, 2021 Florida Power & Light - Michael Martinez September 14, 2021 No Response Received Collier Michael.Martinez@fpl.com Summit Broadband Michelle Daniel September 14, 2021 September 21, 2021 michelle.daniel@summit-broadband.com TECO Peoples Gas — Ft Ken Smith August 16, 2021 August 17, 2021 Myers KESmith@Tecoenergy.com 2-25 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study C 9 m Y C C C Z 3R0 ST NW 1 m m r 0 1ST STNW � j� wn-soN LVp � _ N JAI- HOC N 41 sr _Ll-- Z D a � 2NO ST NE b m m z z m v m m m - Roads coRgSCRE CANAL F — canals Major Streets Raw Water Main m p 25 lo# Production well Sou e'. CDIIIeY Ca n(y PUO, FG Figure 2-16. Existing County Water Production Infrastructure Along Wilson Boulevard 2.2.3.3 Noise -Sensitive Sites Noise -sensitive sites within the study area were identified and categorized based on FDOT's Project Development and Environment Manual (FDOT 2020).6 A desktop review indicates that numerous single-family homes are present along the project. Single-family housing is identified as FDOT's Activity Category B, which only includes consideration of external impacts. The Noise Abatement Criteria level for Activity Category B is 66 A -weighted decibels. The remaining sites within the study area consist of commercial facilities and undeveloped land (Activity Categories E and G, respectively), which are determined to be less sensitive to traffic noise. Undeveloped lands do not require consideration of noise mitigation based on FDOT criteria. Potential noise impacts and mitigation considerations are further discussed in Section 6.15.3 of this report. https://www.fdot.gov/environment/pubs/pdeman/pdeman-current 2-26 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 3. Future Conditions 3.1 Future Land Use Collier County's Growth Management Plan was reviewed to determine the future land use of the study area. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan? identifies all four quadrants of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard intersection as a neighborhood center for commercial and conditional use development. The Estates Shopping Center is planned for the northwest quadrant of the neighborhood center. The rest of the study area future land use is anticipated to remain as residential. VBRX is planned to be constructed as a County roadway by 2024. The road will intersect Wilson Boulevard in the study area between 10th Avenue Northwest/Northeast and 12th Avenue Northwest/Northeast. Figure 3-1 presents the future land use map. 3.2 Project Traffic A preliminary traffic analysis was performed using FDOT's Division 1 Regional Planning Model (D1RPM). Table 3-1 presents the D1RPM's predicted traffic volumes (in annual average daily traffic [AADT]) for Wilson Boulevard in 2045. The traffic analysis provided a general comparison of the future 2045 LOS along Wilson Boulevard as a two- lane roadway (No -Build Alternative) with the future 2045 Wilson Boulevard as a four -lane facility (Build Alternative). The analysis revealed that the future No -Build Alternative (no widening) would result in Wilson Boulevard failing between Immokalee Road and the future VBRX. Table 3-1. 2045 No -Build and Build Traffic Volumes 2045 D1RPM Model Volume Four -Lane 2045 Wilson Blvd. 2045 Build No -Build Roadway From To (AADT) (LOS)a (LOS)a Wilson Blvd. Golden Gate Future VBRX 7,260 C C Blvd. Wilson Blvd. Future VBRX Immokalee Rd. 18,480 C F a Based on FDOT 2020 Generalized Level of Service Tables Volumes LOS D 2-Lane Capacity: 15,900 LOS D 4-Lane Capacity: 35,800 7 https://www.colIiercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=851 3-1 TwlnF-agles Golf Club Immo4(alee RD 24th AVE NW ,}I iiv{N/riRO FAmILYCHuRcn .l 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW F 18th AVE NW _ o Jung BLVD W 16th AVE NW 4NW_14th AVE L�F,cr,iWIT11' 12th AVE EyER';OIE�si` e 1, idd 10th AVE NW Future Van R dE en Gate BLVD W it Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study o e .. o �1 L.-11 III IIIIIIIIIf==111lllllllll111lCIIIIIIIIlI=._'I 24th AVE �1111111{IIIIIill11111111 IIlIIIIlIIIIIIIll:�111111111__III� �IIIIIII Illllllll IIIII111lllll�=lllllllll!{ IIIlI1111111111== illllllli111111111111=' �Illlilllllllll 11111111111. Illpllllllllll{{IIIIII�=lllll{IIIIIIII=1i1111lIIII■' IIi111111Illllllly� �1Ii1111111111111111I1� IIIIIIIIIII11��11111l1111.■II.I■— {IIIIIIE�IIIIII.I■■11.11�E II{Ili�ll�ll�llil��l��lllllt'Illlll �I 111111f1111111111i1111 Illlfllllll1111111{! �Illln BLVD E — County Road Parcel Water Body M 'RLS Sending Area Future Vanderbilt Beach Rd Extension — Local Road Study Limits Residential 'RLS Neutral Area p Canal i= Study Area //j Planned Development 'RLS Receiving Area 'Buret Land Stewardship Figure 3-1. Future Land Use N Source: 1 Collier Co. ] MIIBS FOOT 3-1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 4. Design Controls and Criteria 4.1 Roadway Design Criteria The design criteria and standards are based on design parameters in accordance with the FDOT 2018 Florida Greenbook (FGB)8 (effective July 20, 2021), Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) (updated September 7, 2021), and 2022 FDOT Design Manual (FDM; FDOT n.d.). The corridor was developed using a design and posted speed of 45 mph. Table 4-1 presents the design criteria applicable to the corridor development. Design constraints include avoiding impacts to the County production wells, existing residential homes, and existing commercial structures. Table 4-1. Design Criteria Design Element Wilson Boulevard Criteria Source Functional Classification Major Collector Collier County Growth Management Plan Transportation Element 3 M v c Design Speed — Urban Collector g p 45 m p h FGB Table 3-1 v Posted Speed 45 mph Scope of Services Access Management 245 feet FDM Table 201.4.2 (Class Connection Spacing 5) No. Lanes (Ultimate) 4 (2 per direction) Scope of Services Lane Width — Urban Collector FGB Table 3-20, (7) Travel Lane 11 feet min. Turn Lane 11 feet (10 feet min.) Bike Lane Width FGB Figure 9-1 Curbed Street without Parking 4 feet min. Roadway with Flush Shoulder 5 feet min. and Barrier c ° u U Sidewalk Width 6 feet LDC 6.06.02 a `A Outside Full (Paved) 10 feet Full (5 feet min. Paved) FDM Table 210.4.1 m u t Inside/Median Bridge 16 inches FDM Figure 260.1.3 Outside Bridge 6 feet 4 inches FDM Figure 260.1.3 a (includes 5-foot-wide n bike lane) Median Width 22 feet FGB Table 3-23 (19.5 feet min.) Border Width — Urban General 12 feet FDM Table 210.7.1 (1) s The official title of the FGB is Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (FDOT 2021c). 4-1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 4-1. Design Criteria Design Element Wilson Boulevard Criteria Source Clear Zone 6 feet FGB Table 4-1 (1b) ROW Width 160-foot to 200-foot ROW width was LDC 6.06.01. N evaluated Min. Stopping Sight Distance 360 feet FGB Table 3-4, level roadway Merging Taper Termination Length 50:1 recommended but not less than shown FGB Figure 3-19 in Table 3-26 c Max. Deflection w/o Curve 1° 00' FDM 210.8.1 N Length of Curve 675 feet FDM Table 210.8.1, FGB Table 3-8 (400 feet min.) Max. Curvature (Min. Radius) 8' 15' (694 feet) FDM Table 210.9.2 Max. Superelevation 0.05 FGB 3.C.4.c.2 Max. Grade 8% FGB Table 3-16 Max. Change in Grade w/o Vertical 0.7 FFGB Table 3-17 Curve Base Clearance above BCWE 3 feet from bottom of the FDM 210.10.3. (2) roadway base course v Crest Curve K 61 FGB Table 3-18 Sag Curve K 79 FGB Table 3-18 Vertical Clearance 16.5 feet FGB 3.C.7. j.4. (b) BCWE = Base Clearance Water Elevation 4.2 Drainage Criteria Drainage was evaluated based on SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook, Volume I (effective December 22, 2020) and Volume II (effective May 22, 2016). The preliminary design of stormwater management systems for this project is regulated by the rules and criteria set forth by SFWMD and FDEP. This section outlines the requirements to meet water quality and quantity standards. 4.2.1 Water Quantity Criteria 4.2.1.1 SFWMD Attenuation All basins within the study area are expected to be open basins. The SFWMD discharge rate criteria are: ■ The offsite discharge rate is limited to rates not causing adverse impacts to offsite properties, and: — Historic discharge rates; or — Rates determined in previous SFWMD permit actions; or — Rates specified in SFWMD criteria. 4-2 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study ■ A design storm event of 25-year frequency over 72-hour duration, will be used to compute the discharge rates. — Stormwater attenuation for reconstruction of the existing roadway requires the proposed ponds attenuate the difference between the 25-year/72-hour pre- versus post -discharge rate. 4.2.1.2 Collier County Attenuation The study area is within basins with maximum allowable discharge rates approved in 2016 for Collier County water quantity criteria. It is anticipated these criteria will not apply because this project is a proposed reconstruction of an existing roadway. ■ Cypress Canal Basin, 0.06 cubic feet per second per acre (cfs/acre) ■ Corkscrew Canal Basin, 0.04 cfs/acre 4.2.1.3 Water Quality Criteria The SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) water quality criteria for retention, detention, or a combination of both in the overall system will provide for the following volumetric requirements: ■ Wet detention volume provided for the greater of the first 1 inch of runoff over the drainage area or 2.5 inches of runoff over the impervious area (excluding water bodies). ■ Dry detention volume provided equal to 75% of the above amounts computed for wet detention. ■ Retention volume provided equal to 50% of the above amounts computed for wet detention. North Golden Gate Sub -Basin, WBID 3278S, is impaired for dissolved oxygen with TN designated as the causative pollutant. Although there is not a current total maximum daily load or Basin Management Action Plan yet established, additional protective measures must be incorporated into the project improvements to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed discharge will not cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards. Additional protective measures required by SFWMD include a site -specific pollutant loading analysis and an additional 50% water quality treatment volume. SFWMD land use and coverage criteria require that projects having greater than 40% impervious area and which discharge directly to the Big Cypress area of Collier County will provide at least one-half inch of dry detention or retention pretreatment as part of the required retention/detention. Pursuant to subsection 62-555.312(3), F.A.C., stormwater retention and detention systems are classified as moderate sanitary hazards with respect to public and private drinking water wells. Stormwater treatment facilities will not be constructed within 100 feet of a public drinking water well, and will not be constructed within 75 feet of a private drinking water well. An additional constraint is the 300-foot required setback for stormwater treatment ponds from the existing County production wells. Refer to the Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis in Appendix E for additional details on design criteria and existing drainage patterns. 4-3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 5. Alternatives Analysis 5.1 Initial Alternatives Analysis As noted in Section 2.1.3, Wilson Boulevard was constructed within a roadway easement that is 100 feet wide. The centerline of the existing roadway is located on the east side of the existing roadway easement centerline. Considering that the Wilson Boulevard footprint is approximately 27 feet wide, approximately 18 feet of existing roadway easement is available to the east and 55 feet is available to the west. A typical section analysis was performed to identify a typical section that addresses the project's purpose and need and meets design criteria, but minimizes impacts to resources in the project area, including numerous residential properties and driveways, non-residential properties, and the Collier County Public Utilities Department water supply production wells and associated infrastructure. Typical section options between 160 feet and 200 feet wide were evaluated by increasing the width in 5-foot increments and estimating impacts (refer to Figure 5-1). The evaluation revealed that a typical section width of 165 feet met the project needs but had the least amount of impacts along the project corridor. Using the recommended typical section width of 165 feet, three initial alternatives were developed by overlaying the typical section on three different alignments. Two of the alignments were offset by 5 feet to left and then 5 feet to the right of the existing roadway easement centerline. The third alignment was centered on the existing roadway easement centerline. The initial alternatives were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively and included review of the constructability, maintenance of traffic, construction costs, and potential impacts associated with each alternative. In addition, to accommodate the base clearance between the roadway base layer and seasonal high-water table, and to facilitate stormwater hydraulics, the vertical profile of Wilson Boulevard requires an increase of approximately 2 to 3.5 feet (varies along the corridor) from the existing roadway elevation. The change in vertical profile was part of the initial alternatives evaluation. While all three alternatives were found to be constructable, there was a large variance in construction costs based on the impacts to the County production wells. Coordination with the County Public Utilities Department revealed that the production wells within the project limits were in desirable locations because they produced high volumes of water. Because of the high costs associated with moving the production wells, combined with the risk that new production wells could be less productive, the Utilities Department requested that the production wells not be impacted by the project. The Utilities Department further requested that impacts to the well houses, including access impacts, be minimized. Based on the initial alternatives analysis and coordination with the Utilities Department, the right offset initial alternative was found to have the least impacts, including the least amount of impacts to the production wells' operating times (or down time during construction). Therefore, the right offset initial alternative (refer to Figure 5-2) was advanced as the project's viable alternative. Appendix F summarizes the Initial Alternatives Evaluation. 5-1 160'-200' Figure 5-1. Typical Section Options Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 5-2 ........................................................................................... . Q 0 I ° I F 2 C9 O W + N Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study .. PROPOSED 165' RIGHT OF WAY --------------------- --- ------------- ---- ----------------------------- Sidewalk ; Median t t Pathway 32'-3" 6' . 3 �.2' 5' 11' 11' 22" !1' 11' 5' .3'. 10' 30•-9'.. *PROPOSED 80' RIGHT or WAY 'PROPOSED 85' RIGHT OF WAY (PROPOSED 100' AT WELL SITES) "RIGHT OF WAY LIMITSIDISTRIBUTION SUBJECT TO CHANGE DURING DESIGN Figure 5-2. Build Alternative Typical Section (Right Offset) a a 2 i7 CC W N a O a a 5-3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 5.2 Viable Alternative The viable alternative was further refined and requires approximately 30 feet of ROW to the west and 35 feet of ROW to the east of the existing roadway easement centerline. The required roadway vertical profile change complicates access to some of the County production well sites since they will remain at their existing elevations. Additional improvements such as retaining walls are likely required and should be considered during the project's design phase. 5.2.1 Transportation System Management and Operations Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) alternatives are defined as low capital cost transportation improvements designed to maximize the use and efficiency of the existing transportation system through improved system management. The various forms of TSMO activities include: ■ Traffic signal improvements ■ Intersection improvements ■ Widening of parallel arterials ■ Transit ■ Intelligent Transportation Systems This project serves as a TSMO strategy (widening of parallel arterials) to the parallel arterial Collier Boulevard. No TSMO alternatives meet the project's purpose and need and, therefore, no additional viable alternatives related to TSMO were developed. 5.3 Build Alternative With further refinements and evaluation of design criteria and impacts to existing residential and non-residential properties and the existing County production wells, the viable alternative was advanced as the Build Alternative, with a 165-foot-wide typical section, offset to the right of the existing roadway easement centerline. The Build Alternative was presented at the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting on October 27, 2021. Based on comments received during the public meeting, the Build Alternative was further refined and is advanced as the Recommended Alternative to the Collier County Board of Commissioners for approval. 5-4 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 6. Design Features of the Recommended Alternative This section summarizes the results of the preliminary design analysis of the Recommended Alternative, including a detailed discussion of the preliminary design features. Appendix A includes the Recommended Alternative Preliminary Concept Plans. This section also summarizes the social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts associated with the Recommended Alternative. 6.1 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry The Recommended Alternative includes constructing the northbound travel lanes within the footprint of the existing travel lanes. The median and southbound travel lanes are proposed to the west of the existing lanes. The proposed roadway centerline is west of the existing roadway centerline. Note: It is assumed that the VBRX project will be constructed before the widening of Wilson Boulevard; therefore, the horizontal alignment of the proposed improvements should be designed in coordination with the planned VBRX and Wilson Boulevard intersection. The vertical profile for the proposed improvements increases approximately 2 to 3.5 feet (varies along the corridor) from the existing roadway elevation. The vertical change is needed to accommodate the base clearance requirements between roadway base layer and seasonal high-water table, and to facilitate stormwater hydraulics. During the design phase, the changes to the proposed roadway vertical profile should be optimized to minimize ROW impacts, promote efficient stormwater conveyance, and ensure that peak design high-water stages do not encroach into travel lanes. Additionally, vertical alignment design will need to consider the existing County production wells and intersecting cross streets, which will remain at their existing elevations. Based on the preliminary design analysis, retaining walls are anticipated west of the proposed sidewalks adjacent to each well site. Improvements at the cross streets are anticipated to transition from their existing grades to the proposed Wilson Boulevard elevations. 6.2 Intersection Concepts Improvements at all of the intersections in the study area are required to accommodate the new lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalks, bike lanes, and shared -use path. The following sections detail the improvements at each of the intersections. 6.2.1 Proposed Golden Gate Boulevard Intersection Improvements Proposed improvements at the Golden Gate Boulevard intersection include the addition of a traffic separator at the northbound and southbound legs. The existing left -turn only and combined through/right-turn lane of the northbound intersection leg is proposed as two left -turn only lanes, two through lanes, and one right -turn only lane. The existing combined through/left-turn lane and right -turn only lane of the southbound leg is proposed as two left -turn only lanes, one through lane, and one right -turn only lane that is channelized with a pedestrian crossing and refuge island. The southbound leg also includes a striped -out lane that could be used as an additional through movement in the future. The westbound leg is proposed to remain in the existing condition. The eastbound leg is proposed to include an additional left -turn only lane. This leg has limited median space to accommodate double left -turn only lanes. It is likely that sections of Golden Gate Boulevard will need to be redesigned and reconstructed from 1st Street Northwest (west of the intersection) to the Wilson Boulevard intersection. Figure 6-1 presents the proposed concept at the intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard. It is important to note this Study did not include traffic counts for turning movement volumes or for traffic modeling. The proposed ROW boundaries at the intersection will accommodate double northbound right -turn lanes and double southbound right -turn lanes. Traffic modeling is recommended during the design phase to determine whether double right -turn lanes are warranted. 6-1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Based the most recent FDM design criteria, the two driveway entrances in the northeast quadrant (gas station) are too close to the intersection. Double westbound right -turn lanes should be evaluated during the design phase if the two driveways are relocated. Based on existing traffic operations and discussions with the County, an intersection capacity study can be performed to evaluate an additional through lane (third through lane) along Golden Gate Boulevard. The anticipated limits of an additional through lane would extend from 2nd Street Northeast to 3rd Street Northwest. Traffic volumes, ROW impacts, safety, and access management should be considered with the intersection capacity study. Figure 6-1. Proposed Concept of the Golden Gate Boulevard Intersection 6.2.2 Proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Intersection Improvements The planned signalized VBRX intersection is assumed to be constructed before Wilson Boulevard is widened. All legs of the intersection are proposed as two through lanes, one right -turn lane, and two left -turn lanes. The right turns are channelized for the southbound and eastbound right -turn movements. Dedicated bike lanes also are added at all legs of the intersection. Figure 6-2 presents the intersection concept plan. 6-2 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Figure 6-2. Proposed Concept of the Planned Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Intersection 6.2.3 Proposed Immokalee Road Intersection Improvements Proposed improvements at the Immokalee Road intersection include converting the northbound combined left/through lane to a through only lane. A traffic separator is added to the south leg of the intersection, along with two northbound left -turn only lanes. Two channelized northbound right -turn only lanes are proposed and include a pedestrian crossing and refuge island. A dedicated bike lane also is added to the northbound leg. The south - bound combined left/through and right -turn only lanes are converted to the northbound through lane and traffic separator. The new southbound lanes include a through lane and dedicated left -turn only and right -turn only lanes. The eastbound right -turn only lane remains, but is channelized with a pedestrian crossing and refuge island. The westbound left -turn lane is restriped to allow dual left -turn lanes. Figure 6-3 presents the proposed concept at the intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Immokalee Road. Note that the bridge culvert over the Cocohatchee Canal (north leg of intersection) requires widening to accommodate the new southbound lanes and receiving northbound lane. It is important to note this Study did not include traffic counts for turning movement volumes or for traffic modeling. Traffic modeling is recommended during the design phase to determine whether double right -turn lanes (northbound Wilson Boulevard to westbound Immokalee Road) are warranted. This Study evaluated at -grade improvements only. Based on existing traffic operations and discussions with the County, an intersection capacity study can be performed to evaluate if an additional eastbound and westbound through lane (fourth through lane) along Immokalee Road is warranted. The study limits, along with traffic volumes, ROW impacts, safety, and access management, should be considered with the intersection capacity study. The proposed Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard Intersection Phase 2 (flyover) project, located less than 0.5 mile east of this intersection, is listed in the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP as an unfunded need by 2045. The limits of the CR 846/Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection PD&E Study ended just west of Wilson Boulevard and did not include the Wilson Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection. As noted in the study's Preliminary Engineering Report,9 the Phase 2 flyover would impact the Wilson Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection. The study recommended evaluation of innovative intersection designs that are compatible with the proposed flyover 9 http://swflroads.com/immokalee/randall/pde/images/2-435368-1 CR846 PER FINALss.pdf 6-3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study ramp but would also accommodate additional traffic demand once Wilson Boulevard is widened. Because of the limited length available between the flyover bridge ramp and the Wilson Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection, weaving movements for the left turn to southbound Wilson Boulevard should be evaluated once the flyover ramp is programmed. The PD&E Study also recommended that potential traffic issues be further analyzed during the design phase using traffic microsimulation models. The proposed flyover ramp would add a fourth through lane to westbound Immokalee Road prior to the intersection. However, another option is to extend the flyover ramp over the Wilson Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection where it would return to at -grade west of the intersection. The additional bridging and ROW needs associated with this option would result in a significant cost increase. If additional through lanes are added to the intersection as a result of the previously mentioned intersection capacity study, the flyover merge would then add a fifth westbound through lane at the intersection. Figure 6-3. Proposed Concept of the Immokalee Road Intersection 6.2.4 Proposed Minor Intersection Improvements In the proposed condition, the existing Wilson Boulevard lanes become the northbound lanes and the new southbound lanes are to the west. The number of lanes for the eastbound/westbound legs of the intersections will remain the same in the proposed condition. Traffic separators are added to the northbound and southbound intersection legs, along with dedicated left -turn only lanes that are offset to improve sight distance. To achieve a proper turning radius, U-turn accommodations (additional pavement) are added to allow a U-turn movement from the inside left -turn only lane. Right -turn only lanes are added to the northbound and southbound intersection legs. Crosswalks are added to the eastbound and westbound legs to accommodate the proposed sidewalks (east side of Wilson Boulevard) and shared -use path (west side of Wilson Boulevard). Figure 6-4 presents a typical proposed concept for the study area minor intersections. 6-4 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Figure 6-4. Proposed Concept of the Minor Intersections 6.3 Bridge Analysis Because of the proposed alignment, the need for added traffic capacity, and pedestrian and vehicular safety feature upgrades, the existing bridge is deemed to be functionally obsolete and will be replaced with a significantly wider bridge. It is proposed to construct the new bridge in two phases to accommodate temporary traffic control by maintaining two lanes of vehicular traffic to minimize disruption to the traveling public. The proposed bridge has three 40-foot-spans, with a total bridge length of 120 feet. The three -span layout will meet SFWMD horizontal clearance requirements. The end spans will provide accommodation for wildlife shelves, which will be coordinated during design. The vertical alignment at the bridge will be influenced by design high- water levels and the vertical clearance requirements will be based on hydraulics and wildlife crossing. Refer to Appendix G for the proposed bridge typical section, concept plan, and elevations. Based on the anticipated span length, a precast prestressed Florida Slab Beam with cast -in -place concrete topping superstructure supported by conventional prestressed concrete pile bents is envisioned for the proposed structure. The structure type selection and specific details will be determined as part of the bridge design. The existing bridge culvert over the Cocohatchee Canal at the Immokalee Road and Wilson Boulevard intersection will need to be widened or replaced to accommodate the additional lanes. The capacity and size of the bridge culvert should be coordinated with SFWMD and evaluated during design. 6.4 Proposed Access Management Changes Three U-turn only lanes are proposed along Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and 10th Avenue Northwest/Northeast to accommodate access for residential and commercial properties with driveways along Wilson Boulevard. The U-turns will be spaced approximately at 0.3 mile and the locations were selected based on spacing, conflicts with future residential driveway access, and property boundaries. To achieve a proper turning radius, U-turn accommodations (additional pavement) are added. Figure 6-5 presents a concept of the access management changes. 6-5 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Figure 6-5. Conceptual Layout for U-Turn Access The proposed improvements impact each driveway along Wilson Boulevard within the project limits and require reconstruction. Where driveways aligned with the proposed taper for turn lanes or U-turn accommodations, the turn lane or U-turn area was extended so that residential driveways were aligned with the roadway and not along a taper. Driveways impacted by the proposed Cypress Canal bridge replacement will require evaluation and coordination with property owners during the design phase. The proposed improvements also will impact access to the commercial properties at the Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard intersection. Because of the raised median, the gas station entrance along Wilson Boulevard (northeast quadrant of intersection) is converted from a full access to a right -in and right -out only. Similarly, the Walgreens entrance along Wilson Boulevard (southwest quadrant of the intersection), as well as the shopping plaza entrance (southeast quadrant of the intersection), also will be converted from full access to right -ins and right -outs only. Figure 6-6 presents the proposed access changes. The two driveway entrances in the northeast quadrant (gas station) do not meet the current FDM design criteria spacing requirements. During the design phase, a new property access should be evaluated and coordinated with the property owner. Figure 6-6. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Intersection Access Management Changes 6-6 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 6.5 Variations and Exceptions Variations and design exceptions, for the controlling elements, are not anticipated for this project. 6.6 Right -of -Way The Recommended Alternative will require ROW acquisition. Because multiple properties along the study area include 50 feet of roadway easement, the roadway easements will need to be extended through the ROW acquisition process. Additional ROW needed for the proposed improvements (refer to Figure 5-2) should be obtained as an easement for consistency with the platted Golden Gate Estates area. For the multiple driveways along Wilson Boulevard, temporary driveway restoration easements and temporary construction easements may be needed. Additional ROW at the major intersections may be required and should be evaluated, as the centerline of the proposed typical section may shift during the design phase. Coordination with SFWMD will be required during the design phase for additional property needs associated with the bridge replacement over the Cypress Canal, particularly if SFWMD requires a boat ramp. Additional utility easements west of the proposed ROW at the County water production well sites are required to accommodate the improvements needed as a result of the roadway widening project. 6.7 Multimodal Accommodations The proposed improvements include the addition of 5-foot-wide bike lanes along both northbound and southbound travel lanes, a 6-foot-wide sidewalk to the west, and a new 10-foot-wide shared -use path to the east. These improvements are proposed to enhance transit use and walking and biking along the corridor. Crosswalk improvements also are included at all intersections along the corridor. CAT bus stop enhancements are proposed to include bus stop pads, and if cost feasible also include upgraded shelters, benches, bike racks, and trash cans at each stop. Based on coordination with CAT, the preference is to reuse existing transit structures (relocated) to accommodate the widening. The existing CAT bus stops will be relocated near proposed right -turn only lanes or U-turn accommodation areas so through traffic is not blocked during transit stops. The transit relocation evaluations should consider intersection and corridor operations, land use, access management, and safety. To accommodate transit needs at the planned VBRX and Wilson Boulevard intersection, it is recommended to relocate the bus stops north and south of 14th Avenue Northeast/Northwest (Bus Stop ID 675 and 676) to the future southbound Wilson Boulevard right -turn lane for 10th Avenue Northwest and the northbound Wilson Boulevard right -turn lane for 12th Avenue Northeast. These improvements are anticipated to reduce future congestion and provide more reliable travel times for transit routes that operate along Wilson Boulevard. It is also recommended to improve the CCPS bus stop on Wilson Boulevard, just south of the intersection with Golden Gate Boulevard. For consistency with similar CCPS bus stops along Golden Gate Boulevard east of Wilson Boulevard, the proposed sidewalk can be widened to provide bus stop pads, a bench, and bike rack and should be coordinated with CCPS. 6.8 Preliminary Drainage Analysis The Recommended Alternative includes a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. Onsite runoff along the curb and gutter will be drained to proposed stormwater ponds via closed storm sewer. Existing offsite drainage patterns will be maintained within the ROW. Roadside ditches on the east and west sides of the roadway will be improved to maintain existing offsite drainage patterns from the surrounding businesses and residential properties. Because of the length of the project, flat topography, conveyance feasibility limitations, and hydraulic gradient concerns, dividing onsite basins into multiple segments that drain to multiple stormwater ponds along the 6-7 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study project is recommended. Refer to the Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis in Appendix E for additional information on proposed onsite basins and pond sites. 6.9 Floodplain Analysis The footprint of the Recommended Alternative is anticipated to impact approximately 44 acres of the 100-year floodplain (Zones AE and AH). SFWMD requires no net encroachment into the floodplain, between the average wet season water table and that encompassed by the 100-year event, which will adversely affect the existing rights of others. The proposed Wilson Boulevard roadway improvements are anticipated to reduce floodplain storage. However, the proposed stormwater pond sites and roadside swales will provide storage compensation to demonstrate no net decrease in floodplain storage. 6.10 Cost Estimates Table 6-1 summarizes the Recommended Alternative estimated costs. Total project costs were based on FDOT's Long Range Estimating (July 2020 Update), and adjusted to include items specific to this project, such as the 10-foot-wide shared use pathway and 5-foot-wide bike lanes, U-turn accommodations, and turning lanes. The conceptual estimate excludes ROW acquisition, mitigation, and permit fees. Table 6-1. Preliminary Cost Estimate Item Estimated Cost (millions) Roadway/Drainages $37.99 Signals $1.20 Lighting $1.60 Structuresb $4.95 Utility Well House/Vault Infrastructure (pipes, well site improvements) $5.71 Total Construction Cost $51.45 Design and Permitting (8%) $4.11 CEI (8%) $4.11 Total Project Cost $59.68 a Excludes ROW and mitigation costs b Includes replacement of Wilson Boulevard bridge over Cypress Canal and replacement of box culverts at Cocohatchee Canal (Immokalee Road intersection) 6.11 Summary of Environmental Impacts of the Recommended Alternative A preliminary planning analysis was completed to identify direct effects within the defined study area. This analysis was performed to support the identification of the Recommended Alternative for further study. A more -detailed analysis of direct and indirect environmental effects will be required to comply with local, state, and federal requirements and environmental clearance of the Recommended Alternative. This section summarizes potential impacts to social, cultural, natural, and physical resources based on preliminary desktop review and analysis of the Recommended Alternative. 6-8 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 6.11.1 Social Resources Social resource impacts were evaluated based on the Recommended Alternative. The following sections summarize potential impacts based on the existing conditions documented in Section 2. 6.11.1.1 Community Cohesion Because the project maintains the existing Wilson Boulevard access throughout the project limits and involves improvements to an existing roadway, social relationships or movement within the existing communities are not substantially impacted. Existing neighborhoods will not be split by a physical barrier. The improvements will not isolate a portion of an ethnic group or neighborhood nor separate residences from community services/facilities. The proposed improvements will not significantly impact the existing community focal points/resources or isolate them from the community and access to existing community facilities will be maintained. However, traffic patterns may change to accommodate the introduction of a raised median between the northbound and southbound travel lanes by restricting drivers along Wilson Boulevard to make U-turns at the intersections or U-turn access points. The Recommended Alternative is not anticipated to adversely impact elderly persons, disabled persons, minorities, or transit -dependent individuals. The proposed improvements include addition of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, which are anticipated to provide an enhanced experience that increases walking, bicycling, and transit use in the area. For these reasons, minimal impacts are anticipated to community cohesion. Minor access management changes, which include restricted left -turn movements, are anticipated to commercial facilities at the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. Construction of the Recommended Alternative may result in temporary access restrictions to businesses and communities. 6.11.1.2 Economic Resources Wilson Boulevard serves as a north -south connection between a minor arterial (Immokalee Road) and minor collector (Golden Gate Boulevard) and provides access to commercial and residential locations north and south of the roadway. The Recommended Alternative is anticipated to provide enhanced mobility of people and goods along Wilson Boulevard. For these reasons, the project is anticipated to enhance economic conditions. 6.11.1.3 Land Use Changes Land uses along Wilson Boulevard are not expected to significantly change because of the proposed improvements. The Recommended Alternative is expected to result in ROW impacts to residential and non- residential parcels. The proposed improvements are anticipated to impact 212 residential parcels, of which 65 were identified as vacant. Approximately 21 non-residential parcels are expected to be impacted by the project. The ROW impacts are expected to total approximately 29 acres. Stormwater ponds included in the Recommended Alternative are anticipated to be located on vacant and/or undeveloped land. While there are impacts to properties along the project corridor, the Recommended Alternative is not anticipated to result in displacement. Therefore, no substantial land use changes are anticipated because of this project. 6.11.1.4 Mobility The Recommended Alternative provides increased capacity along the corridor and is anticipated to reduce future congestion for all travelers. The Recommended Alternative also would provide pedestrian and bicycle accommodations and, therefore, it would enhance mobility for all users. 6.11.2 Cultural Resources Based on the FDOT EST, the study area contains no historic or archaeological resources. However, a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) is recommended during the design phase to verify the absence of historical 6-9 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and archaeological resources. The CRAS should be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office to receive environmental clearance. 6.11.3 Natural Resources Direct impacts to natural resources were evaluated based on the Recommended Alternative. The following sections summarize potential impacts based on the desktop and a limited field review of the existing natural resources documented in Section 2. The following permits are anticipated for this project: ■ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit (FDEP) ■ Section 404 Individual Permit (FDEP) ■ Individual Environmental Resource Permit (SFWMD) 6.11.3.1 Wetlands and Surface Waters Preliminary desktop analysis indicates that approximately 5 acres of land (associated with the ROW) with the potential to be designated as jurisdictional wetlands may be impacted by the Recommended Alternative. These potential impacts are associated with existing hydric soil. However, because of inconsistencies between the NRCS Soil Resource Report, aerial imagery, and NWI data, additional field observations are recommended to confirm the presence or absence of wetlands within the project area and proposed pond sites. Mitigation would be required should field investigations indicate the presence of wetlands within the limits of construction. The amount of mitigation required for direct and secondary impacts will be determined by the permitting agencies. Wetland and surface water impacts from the project pond sites will be determined based on the pond sites selected and acquired during the design phase. Other surface water impacts associated with the bridge replacement and widening at the Cypress Canal are anticipated. Additionally, widening the roadway and extending the length of the existing bridge culvert at the Cocohatchee Canal is anticipated to result in temporary surface water impacts. A natural resources evaluation is recommended during the design phase to assess potential impacts to wetlands and to facilitate coordination and concurrence with the permitting agencies. 6.11.3.2 Water Quality Because stormwater treatment will be provided in accordance with rules and criteria set forth by the SFWMD and FDEP, additional stormwater discharge resulting from the proposed improvements will not cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards. Refer to Section 4 for additional details. 6.11.3.3 Protected Species and Habitat Based on the review of available information from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and USFWS in relation to the potential habitat impacts that may be associated with the proposed project, potential federal and state-listed/protected species (including protected non -listed wildlife species) were identified that may occur in the project vicinity. Panther habitat impacts are anticipated for clearing of lands for the project area (additional widening) and pond sites. Field visits are recommended during the design phase to confirm or exclude the potential for these species and habitat to occur within the project area and pond sites. A natural resources evaluation is recommended during the design phase to assess potential impacts to species habitat and to facilitate coordination and concurrence with the permitting agencies. A Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) Tracking List was obtained for the project area, as well as an IPaC report on July 27, 2021. Table 6-2 summarizes the potential listed species identified from the FNAI and IPaC reports within the study area and potential pond sites. Appendix C includes a copy of the FNAI Tracking List and IPaC report. 6-10 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 6-2. Potentially Occurring and Observed Listed Species in the Study Area and Potential Pond Sites Potential to Common Name/ Listing Status Occur (Low, Moderate, Scientific Name FWC USFWS Habitat High) Notes Reptiles Eastern indigo T T Gopher tortoise Moderate Requires a large amount of land on which to hunt snake/ burrows, fallen logs prey, but because there are some undeveloped Drymarchon or holes on canal uplands in the area, it is anticipated that with corais couperi banks, hydric adherence to the most recent version of the hammock, USFWS Standard Protection Measures for the palustrine, sandhill Eastern indigo snake during land clearing activities scrub, upland pine and construction, the project may affect, but is forest, mangrove not likely to adversely affect, this species. swamp Gopher T C Old fields, sandhill, Moderate Some undeveloped areas remain in upland soils. tortoise/ scrub, xeric Survey upland area before clearing; obtain FWC Gopherus hammock, ruderal, permit if tortoise burrows are found. polyphemus dry prairie, pine flatwood, fence lines American T (SA) T (SA) Fresh water lakes, Moderate Potential habitat within the project area. alligator/ slow -moving rivers Alligator and their associated mississippiensis wetlands, canals, brackish water Birds Florida T NL Native prairies and Low Suboptimal habitat is anticipated within the study Burrowing Owl/ cleared areas with area. Athene short groundcover cunicularia floridana Bald Eagle/ N/A Refer Forests, estuarine, Moderate Protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Haliaeetus to lacustrine, riverine, Protection Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. No leucocephalus Notes tidal marsh, tidal Eagle nests or the associated 660-foot-wide buffer swamp were documented within the limits of the study area, according to FWC and Audubon Florida Eagle Watch Nest App. Wood Stork/ T T Estuarine tidal High Project is within the Core Foraging Area of known Mycteria swamps/marshes, Wood Stork nesting colonies. Wood Storks are americana lacustrine, seepage known to forage in roadside ditches when water stream, ditches, levels are appropriate prior to breeding season. ruderal Any mitigation needed for the loss of wetlands or ditches/canals (filled or piped) will likely be in the form of mitigation credits. Ditches/canals that are modified, reshaped, or relocated (but not filled) will be considered a temporary impact (no need for bank credits). Red -cockaded E E Mature pine forests Moderate Potential habitat within the project area. Agencies Woodpecker/ containing living will suggest a survey of suitable habitat to search Picoides longleaf pine trees for nest trees. If found, USFWS consultation will borealis be needed. 6-11 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 6-2. Potentially Occurring and Observed Listed Species in the Study Area and Potential Pond Sites Potential to Common Listing Status Occur (Low, Name/ Moderate, Scientific Name FWC USFWS Habitat High) Notes Everglade Snail E E Lowland freshwater Low Potential suboptimal habitat is anticipated within Kite/ marshes and littoral the study area. Rostrhamus shelves of lakes sociabilis Audubon's T T Large areas of dry Low Potential habitat is not optimal; field Crested or wet prairie with investigations during the breeding/nesting season Caracara/ scattered cabbage should be conducted within the study area. Polyborus palms; also wooded Observations recorded from 2018 near Wilson plancus or pasture areas Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. audubonii with scattered saw palmetto, scrub oaks, and cypress Mammals Florida E E Roosts in palms, High The project is located within the USFWS bonneted bat/ snags, cavity trees, Occurrence of Consultation Area for the Florida bonneted bat Eumops buildings, bridges; Foraging and occurs within one of the USFWS designated floridanus forages above Focal Areas for this federally endangered species. natural and human- The project should be evaluated during design for altered landscapes potential roosting habitat to determine whether acoustic and roost surveys are needed during the consultation process. Florida black Refer Forested High Potential habitat within the project area. Two bear/Ursus to communities, mortalities were documented within the project americanus Notes forested wetlands, area in 2001. The Florida black bear is no longer floridanus Baygalls (bayheads) listed as threatened; however, it is protected under the F.A.C. 68A-4.009 Florida Black Bear Conservation. Florida panther/ E E Extensive blocks of High Project is partially located within the Panther Puma concolor forests, large Secondary Zone. Impacts will be mitigated coryi wetlands, can use through panther habitat units. human -altered landscapes Big cypress fox T NL Prefer habitats with High Fox squirrel range encompasses the project area. squirrel/Sciurus open canopy and Pine flatwoods and cypress -cabbage palm forests niger avicennia low/sparse may provide potential habitat within the project understory, and area. that provide year- Survey potential habitat; if species is observed round sources of onsite, surveys for nest trees will be required. food and optimal nesting conditions Species observed in recent years to the west of the project area. Plants Pine -woods T NL Palmetto prairie, Moderate Potential habitat within the project area. bluestem/ pine flatwoods, Andropogon pine-mesic oak arctatus 6-12 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 6-2. Potentially Occurring and Observed Listed Species in the Study Area and Potential Pond Sites Potential to Common Name/ Listing Status Occur (Low, Moderate, Scientific Name FWC USFWS Habitat High) Notes Clamshell E NL Pond apple, cypress, Low Potential habitat within the project area. orchid/Encyclia live oak, and button cochleata var. wood trees in triondra swamps and hammocks Small's flax/ E NL Pine flatwoods, Medium Potential habitat within the project area. Linum corteri disturbed land var. smallii Celestial lily/ E NL Palmetto prairies, Medium Potential habitat within the project area. Nemastylis cabbage palm floridana Ghost orchid/ E NL Cypress, cypress- High Potential habitat within the project area. Polyrrhiza pine -cabbage palm, lindenii and slash pine swamp forest Giant orchid/ T NL Sandhill, scrub, pine Low Potential habitat within the project area. Pteroglossaspis flatwoods, pine ecristato rocklands, and occasionally in old fields Florida royal E NL Residential, mixed Low Potential habitat within the project area. palm/ wetland Roystonea elata hardwoods, and transportation facilities Key: E = endangered, T = threatened, T(SA) = Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance to a listed species, C = candidate for listing, NL = not listed 6-13 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Certain species included in the IPaC report had established critical habitat, but it was outside of the project boundary. Suitable habitat is not anticipated within the study area for the following species: loggerhead sea turtle (T), gulf sturgeon (T), Bartram's hairstreak butterfly (E), Miami blue butterfly (E), Florida leafwing butterfly (E), Florida prairie -clover (E), nodding pinweed (T), and Garber's spurge (T). 6.11.4 Physical Resources Physical resource impacts were evaluated based on the Recommended Alternative. The following sections summarize potential impacts based on the existing conditions documented in Section 2. 6.11.4.1 Contamination A Level I contamination screening evaluation is recommended to identify past and present activities that have the potential to impact areas in, or immediately adjacent to, construction of the Recommended Alternative. Without a Level I screening evaluation, all identified contamination sites have the potential to impact future construction activities. Sites identified as medium and high risk during the screening evaluation should be evaluated by a Level II (also known as Impact to Construction Assessment) or Level III assessment to determine potential impacts during construction. None of the contamination sites listed in Section 2 of this report are anticipated to fall within the proposed ROW. Because contaminants are known to move beyond their source, contamination from the other sites may be present within the proposed ROW. 6.11.4.2 Utilities Preliminary impacts to major utilities include overhead electric (Florida Power & Light), County production wells and associated infrastructure, and the gas line (TECO Gas). Utility locations and coordination should be performed during the project's design phase. Subsurface utility exploration is recommended during the design phase to better identify utility locations and impacts. An impact assessment was performed to evaluate the impacts of the project on the County production wells and associated infrastructure. The assessment included recommended improvements to allow the production wells to remain operational and accessible after the expansion of Wilson Boulevard, including relocating the 24-inch- diameter water main along the western ROW limit. Refer to the Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum in Appendix H for the full assessment and recommended improvements. It is recommended to relocate the gas line to the eastern ROW limit, to avoid conflicts with the water main, production well infrastructure, and drainage piping along the western ROW limit. Overhead electric will need to be relocated to the proposed eastern ROW limit. Power distribution lines to the production well sites are recom- mended to be relocated underground to avoid overhead clearance conflicts when cranes service the well sites. The proposed improvements do not include landscaped medians, but landscaping would be evaluated in the Collier County Landscape Beautification Master Plan.10 Should the project be funded for landscaping in the future, water could be pulled from one of the production wells under a SFWMD well permit. 6.11.4.3 Noise Although the study area contains numerous noise -sensitive sites, identified as single-family housing, noise walls are not anticipated to be a reasonable and feasible mitigation based on the existing traffic volumes. Further, access requirements to the numerous existing driveways and cross streets along the project corridor limit the potential for noise walls. A noise analysis is recommended during the design phase to assess potential impacts from the proposed project and to determine whether reasonable and feasible mitigation is warranted. 10 https://www.col I ie rco u ntyfl.aov/govern me nt/& rowth-m a n age ment/divisions/road-maintenance/I a n dsca pe-o pe ratio ns/landscape-bea utification- master-plan-projects 6-14 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 7. Public Involvement Public involvement is integral during the initial stages of the project to provide awareness of community values and concerns and to gain insight into existing constraints and issues that may affect the development and evaluation of corridor alternatives. Appendix I provides public outreach information including notifications, project newsletter, and social media postings. 7.1 Project Website The County Transportation Planning Section has created a website page under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study" to provide information to the public about the study, answer frequently asked questions, present public involvement materials, and provide the project comment/survey form." Project information was made available at the start of the study and has been updated throughout the duration of the study. 7.2 Public Input Summary A Public Information Meeting was held on October 27, 2021, to provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on the project alternatives. Representatives from Collier County and key project study team members were in attendance to answer questions and discuss the project with meeting attendees. Public comments were collected both as hard copies at the meeting and online after the meeting. Refer to Section 7.2.1 for additional information on the public meeting. Comments also were received via email throughout the entire study period by the County project manager, Lorraine Lantz. Ten project comments or questions were received via email. Additionally, a PowerPoint presentation about the project was presented at "A Night With Your Commissioner," hosted by Commissioner McDaniel (District 5) on December 8, 2021. 7.2.1 Public Information Meeting Summary Collier County held a Public Information Meeting for the project on Wednesday, October 27, 2021, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., at the University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension Office, Multipurpose Room, 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34120. The purpose of the meeting was to provide residents, business owners, and other interested persons the opportunity to review project information and comment on the project alternatives. Because the public meeting took place during the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the County Department of Health recommendations for social distancing were used to guide the meeting format. The number of people in the meeting room at one time was limited to approximately 30. It was recommended that everyone attending wear a face mask. As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, project design details were available on the County Transportation Planning Section's website page under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study" 1 week prior to the meeting. Website information included the meeting displays, project data, and an online comment form. Several notification techniques were used to announce the meeting, including a press release, emails, and letters. A total of 39 people attended the public meeting and 17 members of the project team (including County staff) were available to answer questions. Table 7-1 summarizes the public meeting notifications as well as the number of attendees. 11 https://www.colIiercountyfl.goy/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-protect-pIa nn ing-impact-fees-and-program- ma nagement/tra nsportation-pla nn ing-section/pla nn ing-studies 7-1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Table 7-1. Public Meeting Notification Techniques and Attendees Summary Meeting Notification Format Number of Attendees (excluding Number of Survey Responses Invitations County and Received, Project Meeting Invitation Notification Mailed/ project team Paper/ Team Staff Meeting Format Email Letter Other Emailed members) Online Attendees Elected/ Open House Appointed Public with Project Officials, Property Social Media 225/117 Information Display Agencies, and g Owners Posts Returned: 6 39 4/72 17 Meeting Design Plans Interested on tables Parties On October 7, 2021, a public information meeting notification email, including an attachment of the project newsletter, was emailed to elected/appointed officials, agencies, special -interest groups, and interested parties. The information in the newsletter was provided in English and Spanish. On October 7, 2021, the project newsletter was mailed to property owners located within and near the project area. A map of the property owner database boundary is included in Appendix I along with the property owner mailing list. The property owner database was provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser. Collier County posted notifications on social media sites, including Facebook, Nextdoor, and Twitter. Additionally, two variable message signs that provided meeting information were placed along Wilson Boulevard at the project limits (north of Golden Gate Boulevard and south of Immokalee Road) for 1 week prior to the public meeting. The public meeting also was advertised in Commissioner Penny Taylor's District 4 Newsletter released October 22, 2021. Table 7-2 summarizes the number and type of notifications sent out prior to the meeting. Because of changes to the concepts after the public meeting, an additional project newsletter (Newsletter #2) was distributed to affected property owners on December 31, 2021. Table 7-2. Number of Public Meeting Notifications Summary Meeting Notifications Dates Total Description/Outreach Facebook Post 1: 10/20/21, Post 2: 10/27/21 2 Post 1: 10,976 people reached, 654 engagements, 52 reactions, 28 comments, 26 shares Post 2: 5,394 people reached, 171 engagements, 14 reactions, 12 comments, 5 shares Nextdoor Social Media Post 1: 10/20/21, Post 2: 10/27/21 2 Post 1: 6,398 impressions, 5 reactions, 10 comments Post 2: 5,195 impressions, 3 reactions, 1 comment 10/27/21 1 Twitter 287 impressions, one link clink 10/7/21 81 (23/58) Elected/Appointed Officials 10/7/21 20 Agencies Public Meeting Notifications (via email) 10/7/21 16 Interested Parties/Special-Interest Groups Project Newsletter #1 (via mail) 10/7/21 225 Property Owners Project Newsletter #2 (via mail) 12/31/2021 41 Property Owners 7-2 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study The meeting also was announced by local television news stations, including news stories by NBC2 News on October 24, 2021, and WINK News on October 27, 2021. The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association also posted information about the project on their website. Meeting attendees were given a project comment form and an informational handout as they signed in at the welcome table. The project alternatives were displayed during the meeting. Key project team members were available to talk with the public, as needed. Because of the COVID-19 Pandemic, additional signage recommending social distancing and face coverings was posted at the meeting. Appendix I includes a graphic of the room layout, signage used throughout the meeting space, and a copy of the project informational handout distributed. Several options for making comments were available to members of the public, including making oral comments to the project team during the meeting, providing written comments on comment forms, providing written comments delivered by mail or email, or completing the online comment form available on the County website through November 5, 2021. As a result of the public meeting or meeting notifications, 76 survey responses and 56 comments (free response) were received. A total of 4 comments were received from the paper format comment form, 48 comments were received from the online comment form, and 2 comments were received via email. Table 7-3 summarizes the public comments received. Most comments provided positive feedback for the project. Table 7-3. Public Comments by Theme Theme Number of Comments Natural Environment Concerns 4 Aesthetic Concerns 4 Multimodal Safety 24 Right -of -Way Concerns 6 Traffic 18 Note: Multiple comments on comment forms reflected. The 76 public survey responses yielded the following data: ■ 33% live within the project area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road) ■ 21% use the project area daily, 33% weekly, and 22% responded as other ■ 88% consider themselves a year-round resident ■ 56% prefer lighting along the entire roadway, while 44% prefer lighting only at the intersections/cross streets ■ 30% reported the lack of multimodal facilities as an existing problem (refer to Figure 7-1) ■ 39% would not like to see landscaping along the project area, while 61% would like to see landscaping either in the median, along the shared -use pathway, or both (refer to Figure 7-2). It is recommended to re -survey the public on lighting during the initial design phase and continue coordination with the Collier County Sheriff's Office regarding lighting the entire roadway or only at the intersections. 7-3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply. Lack of Transit Options \ 5% 411� Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes 30% Speeding V 15% Figure 7-1. Existing Problems with the Study Area No Problems Other / 3% 6% Safety 19% Congestion 14% Poor Visibility (Lighting) 8% Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? No 39% Botl Yes, in the .,,o A; Yes, along the shared -use pathway 20% 3red-use pathway and sidewalk 26% Figure 7-2. Landscaping Preferences Along the Study Area 7-4 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study 8. References Collier County. 1997. Golden Gate Area Master Plan. October. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=851. Collier County. 2013. FDOT District One Map 61—Federal Functional Classification/Urban Boundaries, Collier County. October 31, amended June 13, 2017. https://www.colliercou ntyfl.gov/home/showpu blisheddocument/74349/636377094851300000. Collier County. 2020. Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities 2020. https://www.colliercou ntyfl.gov/home/showpu blisheddocument/96231/637474349808770000. Collier County. 2021. Collier County Stormwater Management Facilities. https://colliergmdcm.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8784a4d66eac4f778ca62b9d006e367f. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. 2015. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. December 11, as amended in 2016 and 2018. http://collier.sgsuat.info/Irtp/2040-2. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. 2020a. Transportation Improvement Program, FY2021 to FY2025. June 12, as amended in 2020 and 2021. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/FY21-25-TIP- Adoated-6-12-20-AS-AMENDED-MODIFIED-1.Ddf. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. 2020b. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. December 11. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Final 2045LRTP ElectronicDoc 1-21-21.pdf. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2016. The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetlands Evaluation and Delineation Section: Katherine M. Gilbert, John D. Tobe, Richard W. Cantrell, Maynard E. Sweeley, and James R. Cooper. November. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System Handbook. January. https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default-source/geospatial/documentsandpubsZ fluccmanual1999.pdf. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2021a. Bridge Information. https://www.fdot.gov/maintenance/ bridgeinfo.shtm. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2021b. Florida Bridge Information. April 1. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/defauIt-sou rce/maintenance/str/bi/florida-bridge- information-april-2021.pdf. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2021c. Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (Commonly known as the Florida Greenbook). 2018 Edition. Office of Design Topic # 625-000-015. Effective July 20. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). n.d. "2022 FDOT Design Manual". Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.fdot.gov/roadway/fdm/default.shtm. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2016. Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 11. Effective May 22. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2020. Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I. Effective December 22. 8-1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). n.d. "Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC)". Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.fws.gov/southeast/conservation-tools/information-for-planning-and-consultation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). n.d. National Wetlands Inventory. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/State-Downloads.html. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2021. Custom Soil Resource Report for Collier County Area, Florida. August 26. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region. November. 8-2 Appendix A Preliminary Concept Plans • Y Ski* T ' _ 1 i �r rk ilti • 1 �' _ ,- — talihL r �� �t' , • ti " 'EXISTING R/W ' ph'. AbEASEMENT LINE COUNTY PRODUCTION WELL — VAULT 9 + ` •f R T .•. 7 J* Lw _ I BEGIN CONSTRUCTION _ WILSON BLVD SB WILSON BLVD NB 'f { }• s - 4j'; } r � � r I ■ 2 Y o 0 M N z J ri zSWALE BOTTOM N .41 IF r =0 _ q �. . �it A i Y Jr w •� it.� ~S REVISIONS 7 DATE DESCRIPTION DATE DESCRIPTION .Jacobs C®L�dER Y l�'If/L5®1� BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDYSTUDYSHEET GROWTH MANAGEMENTENT TT DEPf9RTMElYT NO. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID (239) 5, -1 15 COLLIER CONCEPTUAL ]/-ES fj✓-v}�T ]lD7j PLANS S 1 NAPL S, FL 34DESIGN Pl D 1l lLs�3l1 A� ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. P. E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 $USER$ $DATE$ $TIME$ $FILE$ +� .VIML 113W P"- - -,-I W z J U Q z REVISIONS 7 DATE DESCRIPTION DATE DESCRIPTION .Jacobs GROWTH C®L�dER SENTDCOUNTY l�'If/L5®1� BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDYSTUDYSHEET GROWTH te'd.9NfA�iEJ�EIlT7° EPf9RTMElYT NO. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID (239) 5, FL 15 COLLIER CONCEPTUAL ]j DESIGN jT S fjl N PLANS 7� S z NAPL S, FL 34 1 V� LLlILl1e 1L JL L/t711[e 11111 11 lPl D ll'lLs�3l1 A� ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 0 r• fro T � r• r � PROPOSED R/W LINE + 3 • . I . 0) M 33 34 35 Y � w w zWILSON BLVD NBz Q mom re IIIII IIIII'IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII FUTURE 1 EXIST y DOUBLE ; .I DURING DESIGN r7SS TO BE - , J PROPOSED R1W LINE E• �11 `�.. or ao REVISIONS 7 DATE DESCRIPTION DATE DESCRIPTION .Jacobs C®L�dER 7' l�'If/L5®1� BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDYSTUDYSHEET GROWTH MANAGEMENTENT ° DEPARTMENT NO. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID �y (239)5, -1 15 COLLIER CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLANS 7� S 3 NAPL S, FL 34 YLL d D' 11[Lssll' JL IL/t711[e 111�111 11 IIPl D' ll'lLs�3l1 �'A�' ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. P. E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 NL054649 1212112027 3:41:58 PM C:\Users\NL054649\Documents\00.Projects\2021.04.02.WilsonBlvd.Typicats\C Bow— / 10 50 Feet :► do .!� AIL.. T Ir ' COUNTY PRODUCTION 40 PROPOSED COUNTY UTILITY EASE N,'` ` '� �• , E� '�� PROPOSED R/W LIN WELL - HOUSE 11 T+ �,-, , • - SHOWN FOR FUTURE CHANNELIZED' 1 DOUBLE RIGHT TURN LANES �I PROPOSED R/W LINED CAT BUS STOP - 290 {�L EXISTING R/W z 6' SIDEWALK TYPE F CURG{ITTE EASEMENT LINE '7. t. - ' •� .1 't - .. I. --------- - - - - -- WILSON BLVD SB .G .0 ,[ TYPE F CURB & GUTTER — { 4 '1 - - - - - - WILSON BLVD NB y SY H IL ' SWALE BOTTOM R EXISTI R/W - 10' PATHWAY ��, • �' R EASEM MT LINE _ PROPOSED R/W LINE ■'•n _ CAT BUS STOP - 279 ir I ■ f r' y F [ W-r, 0 r Or 4 44 PROPOSED COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT - _ � a COUNTY PRODUCTION ;.� ' '' - .w • WELL - VAULT 12 W LINE EXISTING R/W w.'� 6' SIDEWALK TYPE F CURB & GUTTER EASEMENT LINE - mp - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — WILS9N BLVD S9— — — — — — — — 1 / r• n PF FI= V GUTTTT-- A WILSON BLVD NB pr IV F Z F EXISTING R/W * 't SWAL4_BOTT0 10' PATHWAY ."' ',"+', ► kp� BASEMENT LINE PROPOSED R/W LINE - r tip" ■ ' ( i •�ti't _ .� t jlw . *r y '} - •,��' • � fit• •4 - FzP Ak 10 _ L 7 i i P t t 1.. f� _ ._ �+ Ij tPROPI D R/W'LINE ! is �..r _ Af - - s ��" t' 1 TING R W -'r T 6' SIDEWA K TYPE F CUMB & GUTTER / �- � EASEMENT LINE a , I Tw WTESON BLVD-38 y TYPE F CURB & GUTTER WILSON BLVD NB i R \ \ +a� SWALE BOTTOM r . EXISTING R/W T " 1,0' PATH AY EASEMENT LINE Ow .74 PROPOSED R1W LINE lull _ - •" �..-� , , •' JL y P k ■e4 �,-y ��"_TTTr - l` • :r '77ff}}"" '41 _- • 'T a a • � "FF _ a�' r l kp 4 sI �ry 0 0 0 0 REVISIONS 11 COLL-YER COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 SHEET NO. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLANS � _ ' ,R •.� •� _ �' sew . q� I I I r 4-��yFz k ■ r r �� . __L-` a �j * y5 � r �' �I • � �� j i' • �y,I �, .,' ROPOSED COUNTY UTILITY EA�F� I�! ...i `;� �� , y' fCNTY PRODUCTION r I .i F f } WELL HOUSE 14 F • e f .w '�~ � � � d lrt F �• i }F�� � r -yC.• 1� 5: �r 4 ED,. W- L'fk EXISTING R/W y EASEMENT LINE 6' SIDEWALK TYPE F CURB & GUTTER .f _ - -WIN man WILS N_9LVD SB ER WILSON BLVD NB - ------- - - - - -- S. r . r W _ SWALE BOTTOM # -` q # +' ' EXISTING R/W _ EASE LINE _ r # PROPOS,ED /W JINE • '"- h •i r J � r � F r ; , �1 d. ti :I a REVISIONS 11 COLL-YER COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MAXAGEME2VT DEPfARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 0 0 0 M SHEET NO. �/17��[��ll�/I� i�(r�l��mll� 1 rEl���i•Jl�ih�iGy So 4 `r � + Ian '►, ���r- .r rt f: i / / All • s + ,- A ��. >�i �ty_� �r� i •'S Fri - �'i�J w + - f _• • '�.►• •�-y ■ Y _ M Ir 16 PF �;• . PROPOSED R/W LINE �` , - '�r `' , •- q EXISTING R/W 6' SI EWALK TYPE `CX/RB UTTER EASEMENT LINE k { - y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WTLSON BLVD-SB PE F CURB & GUTTER WILSON BLVD NB - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i- �; x _ . r EXISTING R/WSWALE 8 TTOM SEMENT LINE i' ■�1 PROPOSED R/W LINE 41 so 4r— top r Ail COUNTY PRODUCTIONr _ _ OPOSED COUNT UTILITY WELL — VAULT 16 "_ PROPOSED R/W LINE�' 4 6' SIDEWALK TYPE F CURB & GUTTER IML -WILSON BLVD SB WILSON BLVD NB rF• i- y. 71 0 10 50 Feet .40 T J Y4 U-)Ln _ k r `• - +L Ewe Lu DRIVEWAY ACCESS TBD _ - EXISTING R/W ^Oil DURING DESIGN TYPE C RB & GUTTER EASEMENT LINE BEGIN BRIDGE BEGIN APPROACH • �a BOTTOM tWE; W DRIAWAY ACCESS T, E;R/Vg E —� DURING DjESIGN 400 i •�r #- k pis. � - ■ _ END BRIDGE END APPROACH W INE W I o � M - 99 �i 0 10 50 1 r, Feet - ` ! Ar f � ■ y .3 • . I Owl 1, :Ln + r w I z J SWALE,BOTTOM � r roo v 46 Nk . . REVISIONS 7 DATE DESCRIPTION DATE DESCRIPTION .Jacobs GROWTH C®L�dER SENTDCOUNTY l�'If/L5®1� BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDYSTUDYSHEET GROWTH �d.�NfAiiEMEIlT7° EPf9RTM-ENT NO. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID (239) 5, -1 15 COLLIER CONCEPTUAL ]j DESIGN TjG}�T PLANS 7N S IZ NAPL S, FL 34 1 L1111L JL L/t711[e 11111 11 lPl D ll'lLs�3l1 A� ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. P. E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 NL054649 1212112021 3:42:19 PM C:\Users\NL054649\Documents\00.Projects\2021.04.02.WilsonBlvd.Typicats\C 0 0 0 0 Ln O ti REVISIONS 11 COLL-YER COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 0 0 0 0 N SHEET NO. �/17��[��ll�/I� i�(r�l��mll� 1 rEl���i•Jl�ih�iGy 13 REVISIONS 11 COLL-YER COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 0 0 6 N 0 N W z J U Q SHEET NO. �/17��[��ll�/I� i�(r�l��mll� 1 rEl���i•Jl�ih�iGy 14 REVISIONS 7 COLL-YER COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MAXAGEME2VT DEPARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY W z J U Q S SHEET NO. �/17��[��ll�/I� i�(r�l��mll� 1 rEl���i•Jl�ih�iGy 15 0 0 0 Ln N ti REVISIONS 11 COLL-YER COUNTYDATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY SHEET NO. �/17��[��lla/�� i�(r�l��l�ll� 1 rEl���i•Jl�ih�iGy 0 0 0 ryr M REVISIONS 11 COLL-YER COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOTTLEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY W z J U Q SHEET NO. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLANS 17 7 41 �k } S'• '} i'7 .4 r .. �F� - fin.' - '�^r 16� e e # - 0 10 50 F . ■ "� Feet !, � "L ►� � � �'. .ice ti . k �' . •� {� _. r MOW IIIIIIIIIIII� ' ��r . � a kk 04 • i �'I, �t •y � � �N' iS S REVISIONS 7 DATE DESCRIPTION DATE DESCRIPTION .Jacobs C®L�dER Y l�'If/L5®1� B®IT/LE d�AI�D CORRIDOR STUDYSTUDYSHEET GROWTH MANAGEMENTENT ° DEPf9RTMElYT NO. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID (239) 5, -1 15 COLLIER CONCEPTUAL ]j DESIGN jT S fjl N PLANS 7� S 18 NAPL S, FL 35 11 V�'' ��LL11L11e1L' JL IL/t711[e 111�111 11 �lPl D' ll'lLs�3l1 �'A�' ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. P. E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 NL054649 1212112021 3:42:32 PM C:\Users\NL054649\Documents\00.Projects\2021.04.02.WilsonBlvd.Typicats\C r COUNTY PRODUCTION __ �.�� r � �• , � � WELL -VAULT 37 E. PROPOSED COUNTYj� CCPS BUS PAD WITHk " UTILITY EASEMENT �` BENCH AND BIKE RACK PROPOSED R/W LINE 6'r E. 42KISTING ' CURB & GUTTERS 4' i ASEMENTRLINE Z Z 1L Z WILS-UN BLVD S7 -- -- — — — — WILSON BLVD NB -------------- �---- - - - - -- .-------- rs. s. - �►r. _ . a ;r. r = SWALE BOTTO EXISTING R/W F iROPOSE R/W L ;, 10' PATHWAY EASEMENT LINE + .• F. w DRIVEWAY A ESS TBD #.. �'' CCPS BUS PAD WITH z ' ENC! AND BIKE RAC DURING DES I BENCH AND BIKE RACK w { Co Ilk ram. � - li ' '- • � S -� � '! i - } _ y��•r �r•fir, 1 r �do PROPOSED dlk r - 1 O _ - �7� T iY �•- •! - - Q) - - -- J 1.7 I� 15161 ti w z J Ja� - 162 163 S flip, fr IF �{ h 1 1 • •III. •IW LINE PROPOSED •- • `� ,I a •- Al ! F■ a 1 • -+ \ 'tic • + f i r' — r REVISIONS 7 .Jacobs C®LLIfER Y p�f%jj/L,§®N� BOULEVARD C®RRCORRIDORSTUDYSTUDYSHEET DATE DESCRIPTION DATE DESCRIPTION ° DEP/9RTMElYT GROWTH MANAGEMENT NO. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 NAPL S, FL 35 (239) 5, 15 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID CONCEPTUAL ]/-ES fjG-v}�T ]lD7j A PLANS DESIGN -1 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. P. E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 COLLIER �.Pl D' ll'lLs�3l1 �'A�' 20 NL054649 1212112021 3:42:37 PM C:\Users\NL054649\Documents\00.Projects\2021.04.02.WilsonBlvd.Typicats\C 41IL A a A. * k 11 • S R :�f ; wo,* - f _ � y � r. i ! ' a- � _ #- •s'x�.-+may x- .we • CCPS' BUS PAD WITH '• BENCH AND BIKE RACK PROPOSED R/W LINE 6' SIDEWALK TYPE F CURB &GUTTER EXISTING R/W r } ."x EASEMENT LINE , � I I 111111111111111 � _ - _� - _ t t is WILS-UN BLVD 5-9 T T J' T T 4- + WILSON BLVD NB ' a" -- - - - - - - - - - - -- e'er - - - - - - - - --- - - � -- - -- g I { j y EXISTING RIW T 10' PATHWAY AS MENT LINE PROPOSED R/W LINE _ BOTTOM �` y�� CCPS BUS PAD IVITH BENCH AND BIKE RAC r oe t , V.V lv�v r� AL PC op 10 IA ro IL it do Llx� ` EXISTING R/W 6' SIDEWALK TYPE F CURB EASEMENT LINE -- - - - - - - -- WTES0N BLV­D__SB TYPE F CURB & GUTTER WILSON BLVD NB 40 s i EXISTING R/W S E BOTTOM 10' PATHWAY r,. EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED R/W LINE e 0 0 0 0 r\ REVISIONS 11 COLL-YER COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION 1.Jacobs GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. COLLIER P.E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 WIILSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 0 0 0 0 Ln Co w z J U Q S SHEET NO. �/17��[��ll�/I� i�(r�l��mll� 1 rEl���i•Jl�ih�iGy 23 qlw �w • .rye 4f: ^� •; '•.• t V IF r s IC zt AV PROPOSED R/W UN � �� 7 �.� *� : ,�: •r �y} �4 x # �-. A e _ XISTING R/W +� f IDEWAL TYPE F CURB & GUTTE'R ASEMENT LINE i WILSON-BLVD SB TYPE F CURB & GUTTER -• t: r_ ` r ^ �' - T T T WILSON BLVD NB — y r Z wJ 44 +. EXISTING R/W a y 10' PAT WAY EASEMENT LINE ■ PROPOSED R/W LINE 41 r 40" +. I E 0 0 0 N M 0) W z J U Q I ' w -�� - I 10 50 Feet 7.. y r.► }0.4 PS BUS D WITH,■ - 1 BENCH AND BIKE RAC r J �* - ►: N CRT 'BUS STOP' _ 289- DOSED R/W LINE - « 6' SIDEWALK TYPE F CURB &GUTTER Pik EXISTING R/W r ,45EMENT LINE WILSON BLVD SB J- T .L .L .L J' T Aa - - _ - -- WILSON BLVD NB Sr — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _/ _ _ -- - _ _ _ Z �•' .� - . � 1. r' .ten _ _ _ IF r pw L rt _ it ! REVISIONS 7 DATE DESCRIPTION DATE DESCRIPTION .Jacobs C®L�dER 7' l�'If/L5®1� BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDYSTUDYSHEET GROWTH MANAGEMENTENT ° DEPARTMENT NO. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 505 ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT ID (239) 5, -1 15 COLLIER CONCEPTUAL ]j DESIGN PLANS 7� S 25 NAPL S, FL 35 1 �' iLll11!' JL IL/t711[e 111�111 11 ilPl D' ll'lLs�3l1 �'A�' ENGINEER OF RECORD: WILLIAM J. GRAMER. P. E. LICENSE NO.: 59090 NL054649 1212112021 3:42:48 PM C:\Users\NL054649\Documents\00.Projects\2021.04.02.WilsonBlvd.Typicals7C • � r •i ���}I' if -� � � *,fir- �. 4z r*' A , I : � � �_ a •.,. • • • { yr• s 41 PROPOSED R/W LINE .:,tr'+ � ' � .,�.- EXISTING . *c� . �TYPE CURB & GUTTER EASEMENT LINE 6' SIDEWALKLINE - "` �"rrtr �•' INS - WILSON BLVD SB •• T - T -'' T T T T � WILSON BLVD NB �► - - — —- EXISTING R/W \ `"'' • w- e '�. EASEMENT LINE 1 PROPOSED R W LINE 10' PATHWAY r It +� IF w P tic gr �+�r ■ ■ ti j r , 'St F z ADDITIONAL THRU LQ w LANE TO BE EVALUATED Q DURING DESIGN � x hh TORE RANDALL BLVD YOVER CONNECTION ' �� r�ti rpr A � � - : .• - it f►� r � � � ` - + ,� � • • - : , Ti �. t O'er + i{ IrPr �► ,� •'' I�IV - LINL >. - 1.�. + EXISTING R/W A} , + ! C-,` '� •�'•� � �` EASEMENT LINE d IL op -vow p _ - -IV4. r ti r ¢�. .�•' ,� TAPER TBD- kr- wdr; ''I ?• `. 'C DURING DESIGN Y ! --- - — WILSON BLVD SB _ ►''�' ,. 1-� TYPE F CURB & GUTTER WILSON BLVD NB AiLL j�-�.ML --.All — PROPOSED R1W LINE .I -"■ � r # -4r .�r�f•y" �. + � r J I• i.■ i ? � ti f + 1 /c 1 *f �y y a •- r l r X ■ I "'` 44 Tye Y y _ �• ,�.a .,.'`. �. ; y _j N ;t �.► ;; E• STING R/W r. +� E MENT LINE Y r' r 41 PF 10JECT r I � 1 • ' 1 F r - r * , EXISTING RIW - - EASEMENT LI • ,d �Ow �i -0 �. _ �• _— -� - ^ i � tom, I — .t• f 4S , r ' Jacobs O: , 80 1PELICAN BAY BLVD, SUITE 0 NAPLES, FL r: (239) 596-1715 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT� WILSONBOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLANS • • • FINANCIAL PRJECT ID ,ENGINEER OF NL054649 1212112021 3:42:55 PM C:\Users\NL054649\Documents\00.Projects\2021.04.02.WilsonBlvd.Typicats\CAD NEW\PLAN Appendix 6 Preliminary Geotechnical Report PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WILSON BOULEVARD OVER CYPRESS CANAL NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants OFFICES Orlando, 8008 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32809, Phone (407) 855-3860 Bartow, 1525 Centennial Drive, Bartow, Florida 33830, Phone (863) 533-0858 Cocoa, 1300 N. Cocoa Blvd., Cocoa, Florida 32922, Phone (321) 632-2503 Fort Myers, 9970 Bavaria Road, Fort Myers, Florida 33913, Phone (239) 768-6600 Miami, 2608 W. 84th Street, Hialeah, Florida 33016, Phone (305) 825-2683 Port St. Lucie, 460 Concourse Place NW, Unit 1, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986, Phone (772) 878-0072 Sarasota, 78 Sarasota Center Blvd., Sarasota, Florida, Phone (941) 922-3526 Tallahassee, 3175 West Tharpe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32303, Phone (850) 576-6131 Tampa, 3925 Coconut Palm Drive, Suite 115, Tampa, Florida 33619, Phone (813) 620-3389 West Palm Beach, 2200 N. FL Mango Rd., Ste. 101, West Palm Bch., FL 33409, Phone (561)687-8200 MEMBERS: ASTM International American Concrete Institute Geoprofessional Business Association Society of American Military Engineers American Council of Engineering Companies 'M Ardaman & Associates, Inc. =V%Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 November 29, 2021 Jacobs 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 505 Naples, FL 34108 Attention: Mr. Bill Gramer, P.E., AICP Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Wilson Boulevard Over Cypress Canal Bridge Replacement Naples, Collier County, Florida Dear Mr. Gramer: As requested and authorized by Jacobs, Ardaman & Associates, Inc. (Ardaman) is pleased to submit this Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report for the proposed Wilson Blvd. Over Cypress Canal Bridge Replacement project in Naples, Collier County, Florida. This report presents the results of the preliminary geotechnical investigation including the field and laboratory testing program, the foundation analyses, and geotechnical recommendations for design and construction. Field and laboratory services were provided by Ardaman. This report has been prepared based on the project information and field and laboratory test results obtained during this study. We have very much appreciated the opportunity to provide our services for this project. If you have any questions concerning the contents of this report or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Z � � �-a �� � Cory Schulte, E.I. Staff Engineer +'.ttj%""I II,",, sokO�, This document has been digitally signed by +++,�,e�•.V�:• ti:''ti�� NSF'•` and sealed Digitally signed by Ivan 64114 SolkoNo I' Ivan Sokolic Date I12021.11.3017:43:35 Ar Or * — -05'00, on the date adjacent to the seal. 5TATE OF o ; •��v� Printed copies of this document are not ,r1'"I E;.�`++1 consideredned and sealed and the IONAL must be verified on any electronic copies. Ivan Sokolic, P.E. Senior Engineer/Branch Manager Florida License No. 64114 9970 Bavaria Road, Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone: (239) 768-6600 Fax: (239) 768-0409 Louisiana: Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Shreveport Florida: Bartow, Cocoa, Fort Myers, Miami, Orlando, Port St. Lucie, Sarasota, Tallahassee, Tampa, W. Palm Beach Jacobs Ardaman Project No. 21-32-4561 November 29, 2021 Page iii of iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................1 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT APPROACH.............................................................................................................1 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION............................................................................................................2 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING..........................................................................................................2 4.1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTING.............................................................................................2 4.2 LABORATORY TEST DATA.....................................................................................................3 5.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS.................................................................................................3 5.1 COLLIER COUNTY USDA SOIL SURVEY.................................................................................3 5.2 USGS TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY..........................................................................................3 5.3 SOIL BORING RESULTS.........................................................................................................3 5.4 GROUNDWATER...................................................................................................................5 6.0 EVALUATION OF BRIDGE FOUNDATION..............................................................................5 6.1 FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVES FOR BRIDGE STRUCTURES........................................................5 6.2 SCOUR CONSIDERATIONSS...................................................................................................5 6.3 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS......................................................................................................5 6.4 DRILLED SHAFT.....................................................................................................................5 6.5 PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILES...........................................................................6 6.5.1 AXIAL CAPACITY...........................................................................................................6 6.5.2 DRIVEN PILE GROUP ACTION.........................................................................................6 6.5.3 LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS..............................................................................................7 6.5.4 DOWNDRAG..................................................................................................................7 6.5.5 VIBRATION CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................................7 6.5.6 PREFORMING................................................................................................................7 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATION.....................................................................................7 8.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS............................................................................................................7 r aman M& & Associates. Inc. Jacobs November 29, 2021 Ardaman Project No. 21-32-4561 Page iv of iv LIST OF TABLES & SHEETS APPENDIXA SITE LOCATION MAP....................................................................................................... FIGURE 1 USDA SOIL SURVEY MAP............................................................................................... FIGURE 2 REPORT OF CORE BORINGS SHEET............................................................................ FIGURE 3 APPENDIX B GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES.....................................................................FIGURES 4 - 7 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATION TESTING ..................................... TABLE 1 APPENDIX C PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILE AXIAL CAPACITY CURVES .............................PLATES 1 & 2 SAMPLE COMPUTER OUTPUTS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS APPENDIX E SOIL BORING, SAMPLING AND TESTING METHODS PROJECT SOIL DESRIPTION PROCEDURE - USCS r aman M& & Associates. Inc. Jacobs Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION November 29, 2021 Page 1 of 13 The project area is located along Wilson Blvd. between 10t" Ave. and Golden Gate Blvd. in Naples, Collier County, Florida. An existing bridge currently provides Wilson Blvd. access across Cypress Canal and we understand there are plans to potentially replace this bridge. The potential new bridge is expected to have end bents and interior bents. This preliminary study was performed to support the design of the potential replacement bridge along Wilson Blvd over Cypress Canal. Due to the very preliminary nature of this study, scour information and details regarding the dimensions and expecting loading for this new bridge have not been provided to Ardaman. We anticipate that information will be available at a later date. At that time, any necessary adjustments will be made to the pile recommendations. We will base our recommendations on the pile design loads being maximized in accordance with the FDOT Structure Design Guidelines. 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed Wilson Boulevard Bridge Replacement structure is located in Naples, Collier County, Florida, Section 3 of Township 49, Range 27 (see Figure 1 — Site Location Map in Appendix A of this report). A two-lane bridge structure currently exists at this site. 2.0 PROJECT APPROACH The purpose of this preliminary geotechnical study was to explore the subsurface conditions within the general vicinity of the proposed new bridge to characterize the general subsurface stratigraphy and provide geotechnical recommendations to guide the design and construction. This report includes test borings performed for the proposed structures and analyses with recommendations for the proposed foundation systems. The borings were performed on the north and south abutment areas. No borings were performed in the canal. In performing this evaluation, we have provided the following services: Reviewed available project information. 2. Conducted a general field reconnaissance of the site and mark the proposed boring locations and determine site accessibility. 3. Called Sunshine State One Call of Florida for underground utility locations to be marked at the site. 4. Reviewed readily available published geologic and topographic information. Reviewed the online Soil Conservation Service (SCS) mapping by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and interactive topographic maps published by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS). M& r & Assoc aeman Jacobs November 29, 2021 Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 Page 2 of 13 5. Performed two (2) soil borings, one (1) on the north side and one (1) on the south side of the canal, by the existing bridge abutment areas. Soil borings were performed using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) boring methodology. 6. Inspected soil samples for visual classification and performed grain size analyses, percent finer than the U.S. No. 200 Sieve (percent silty/clay) Atterberg limits, and corrosion series tests on select representative samples. 7. Reviewed field and laboratory data and performed engineering analyses to develop preliminary design recommendations for chosen foundation systems. 8. Prepared this preliminary geotechnical structure report summarizing pertinent information from our review of the field and laboratory data generated, the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions encountered, and our engineering evaluations and design recommendations. 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION A field exploration program consisting of two (2) SPT borings was conducted during the month of November 2021. The soil borings were performed on the north and south sides of the proposed bridge structure, near the existing bridge abutments. Boring locations were established referencing landmarks shown on aerial photos of this site. The boring locations and the soil profiles are shown on the attached Figure 3 — Report of Core Borings in Appendix A. We have plotted the soil borings using the depth below existing ground surface. The SPT boring procedure was conducted in general accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test designation D-1586. Continuous soil sampling using a 1% inch I.D. split -barrel sampler was performed to a depth of 15 feet with a 5 foot sample interval used thereafter. After seating the SPT sampler 6 inches, the number of successive blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches into the soil constitutes the value commonly referred to as the N- value. The N-value has been empirically correlated with various soil properties and is considered to be indicative of the relative density of cohesionless soils and the consistency of cohesive soils. The recovered split spoon samples were visually classified in the field with representative portions of the samples placed in jars and transported to the laboratory for review by a Geotechnical Engineer and confirmation of the field classification. These methods and procedures are explained in more detail in Appendix E. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING 4.1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTING Representative soil samples collected from the SPT borings were visually evaluated in the laboratory by a geotechnical engineer to confirm the field classifications. The samples were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Classification was based on visual observations with the aid of the laboratory test results performed on selected representative samples. Laboratory classification tests consisting of sieve analysis tests (gradation), percent finer than the U.S. No. 200 Sieve (percent silt/clay), and A Ar aman Jacobs November 29, 2021 Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 Page 3 of 13 Atterberg Limit tests were performed on selected samples in general accordance with ASTM or other applicable specifications. Corrosion tests (pH, resistivity, chloride and sulfate) were also performed on soil samples and a water sample from the existing canal to help provide a basis for environmental classification. 4.2 LABORATORY TEST DATA The available soil classification laboratory test results are presented on the Report of Core Borings sheet and on Figures 4 - 7 — Grain Size Distribution Curves in Appendix B. The environmental classification is summarized in Section 7.0 of this report with the environmental test results presented in Table 1 - Summary of Environmental Classification Testing of Appendix B. 5.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS 5.1 COLLIER COUNTY USDA SOIL SURVEY The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) provides soil information throughout the United States. Based on review of the Web Soil Survey provided in their website, only one soil type is present within the project area. Soil at this site consists of 110 — Brymwood fine sand — Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes. The primary setting for this soil type consists of flatwoods on marine terraces. It is considered to have poor drainage properties and a very high runoff class, with no frequency of ponding or flooding. Hydraulic conductivity characteristics of the soil range from moderately high to high (approximately 0.60 to 5.95 in/hr). The USDA Soil Survey map for the project vicinity is presented on Figure 2 in Appendix A. 5.2 USGS TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY Review of current interactive USGS topographic maps indicates that the majority of the existing ground surface at the boring locations is at an elevation above +13 feet NAVD 88. 5.3 SOIL BORINGS RESULTS The results of the SPT boring program for the proposed bridge is presented in Figure 3 — Report of Core Borings in Appendix A. The soil stratification shown is based on the visual evaluation of recovered samples, laboratory results, and interpretation of the field logs by a geotechnical engineer. The soil types shown represent observations made in the test borings and may not reflect variations between the borings and beyond the depths explored. In general, the SPT borings performed for the proposed bridge replacement encountered the soil profile indicated in the table below. Varying concentrations of gravel (rock fragments) were encountered throughout the borings and are not shown in the table below. The Report of Core Borings sheet should be reviewed for this detail. �e Hraarnan Jacobs Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 November 29, 2021 Page 4 of 13 Depth USCS Blows Per Relative eft) Soil Description Classification 12 Inches Density/ Consistency Boring B-01 0 to 3 Fine SAND, Silty Fine SAND P, SM 8 - 11 Loose to Medium Dense 3 to 9 Hard LIMESTONE -- 50/0" Hard 9 to 12 Silty Soft Weathered LIMESTONE 22 — 42 Soft 12 to 21 Silty Fine SAND SM 3 — 17 Loose to Medium Dense 21 to 27 Silty Soft Weathered LIMESTONE 49 IF Soft 27 to 47 Silty Fine SAND SM 8 — 35 Loose to Dense 47 to 51 Silty Soft Weathered LIMESTONE 20 Soft 51 to 81 Silty Clayey Fine SAND, Cla e Fine SAND SC-SM, SC WOH — 2 Very Loose 81 to 91 Silty Fine SAND SM 22 _ 27 Medium Dense to Dense 91 to 100 Silty Soft Weathered LIMESTONE 25 — 30 Soft Boring B-02 0 to 3 Slightly Silty Fine SAND SP-SM 10 — 28 Medium Dense to Dense 3 to 4'/2 Silty Soft Weathered 8IF Soft LIMESTONE 4'/2 to 9'/2 Hard LIMESTONE __ 50 0 — 50/2" Hard 9'/2 to 12 Soft Weathered LIMESTONE -- 3IF Soft 12 to 27 Fine SAND, Silty Fine SAND P, SM 2 — 36 Very Loose to Dense 27 to 31 Silty Soft Weathered LIMESTONE 26 Dense 31 to 41 Silty Fine SAND SM WOH — 2 Very Loose 41 to 47 Silty Soft Weathered LIMESTONE 25 Soft 47 to 57 Silty Fine SAND SM 1-7 Very Loose to Loose 57 to 81 Sandy CLAY CL WOH - 9 Very Soft to Stiff 81 to 100 Silty Fine SAND SM 5 — 26 Loose to Dense A Ar aman Jacobs Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 5.4 GROUNDWATER November 29, 2021 Page 5 of 13 The borings encountered the groundwater table at approximate depths ranging from 4 to 4 '/2 feet below the existing ground surface. The use of drill mud may have inhibited groundwater flow into the borings and could have affected the accuracy of the groundwater readings. 6.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PILES 6.1 FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVES FOR BRIDGE STRUCTURES Foundation design is required for all structures so that the loads imposed on the underlying soil will not cause shear failures or damaging settlements. In general, bridge structures can be supported on either shallow or deep foundation systems depending on the soil conditions, site characteristics, design criteria, construction considerations and cost. In Florida, the typical shallow foundation type used to support bridge structures is Spread Footings, while the deep foundations include Drilled Shafts, Steel Piles and Prestressed Concrete Piles. Situations may exist where shallow foundations are inappropriate for support of the structural elements, such as the presence of unsuitable soil, adverse hydraulic conditions, or intolerable movements of the structure. Deep foundations are based on the concepts of transfer of load through skin friction and bearing capacity, whereas shallow foundations are based on the concepts of bearing capacity and tolerable settlement. A preliminary evaluation of the foundation alternatives was performed by using the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) methodology to provide preliminary design info. The results are presented in the following sections. 6.2 SCOUR CONSIDERATIONS Scour information has not been obtained at the time of this report. This report will be updated once scour information becomes available. 6.3 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Due to the potential for scour, especially for the interior bents, shallow foundations will not be considered for this project. 6.4 DRILLED SHAFTS Drilled Shafts are a deep foundation system consisting of machine -excavated shafts in soil or rock that are filled with concrete and reinforcing steel. A Drilled Shaft has the advantage of being able to develop high axial and lateral capacities in a single unit. Additionally, the magnitude of vibrations caused by the installation of a Drilled Shaft Pile is much less than the vibrations associated with pile driving operations. However, the quality control of a Drilled Shaft Pile installation requires more engineering judgment, inspection and precaution than is required with driven piles. Due to the preliminary nature of this report, drilled shafts are not being considered for this project. 1Lr a an Jacobs November 29, 2021 Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 Page 6 of 13 6.5 PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILES Prestressed concrete piles are a widely used and proven foundation system in South Florida. The minimum size for prestressed concrete (PSC) piles should be 18-inch square, as referenced in the FDOT Structures Design Guidelines. Due to unknown loading conditions, 18 and 24-inch prestressed concrete piles were analyzed. Precast prestressed concrete piles are readily available and generally have a lower cost per ton of capacity than other pile types. 6.5.1 AXIAL CAPACITY No information was provided regarding the new bridge structure. Therefore, we have assumed that the factored design loads are expected to be maximized without causing the nominal bearing resistance to exceed the values established by the FDOT Structures Design Guidelines. As discussed in the FDOT Structures Design Guidelines, the nominal bearing resistance is calculated by combining the ultimate downdrag value, the net scour resistance and the factored design load as follows: PILE SIZE NOMINAL BEARING ESTIMATED NET SCOUR LRFD (INCHES) RESISTANCE DOWNDRAG RESISTANCE FACTORED (NBR) LOAD (tons) DESIGN LOAD (tons) tons (tons) 18 300 N/A N/A 195 24 450 N/A N/A 292.5 (Factored Design Load) + (Downdrag) + (Net Scour Resistance) ominal Bearing Resistance = N0 Where 0 = 0.65; assuming dynamic load testing with PDA monitoring will be performed. It should be noted that scour was not considered for the proposed bridges. Also, a 0 factor of 0.65 was used assuming 5% of the driven piles would have dynamic testing (Pile Dynamic Analysis, PDA) performed on them. If 100% of the piles are subjected to PDA testing, the (P factor can be raised from 0.65 to 0.75, resulting in about 15% more design load capacity. The axial capacities were calculated anticipating both end bearing and skin friction for the piling, as well as assuming pre -forming to the bottom of the hard limestone strata will be needed. The FDOT program FB Deep was used for the analyses. Elevations are estimated based on USGS data and should be verified by survey. The results of these analyses are attached in Appendix D. Based on our analyses, we do not expect 18 or 24 inch piles to achieve the nominal bearing resistance capacities indicated above within the depths of the borings performed. Davisson capacity curves are shown on Plates 1 and 2 in Appendix C. 6.5.2 DRIVEN PILE GROUP ACTION No reduction of the individual pile capacity will be required if driven piles are spaced center -to - center at 3 times their width or greater. Furthermore, we anticipate piles will be installed in single rows at each pier/bent and pile groups will not be utilized. & As ocamane Jacobs Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 6.5.3 LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS November 29, 2021 Page 7 of 13 Due to the preliminary nature of this report, a lateral load analysis was not performed for this project. 6.5.4 DOWNDRAG It is possible that end bent bridge piles will be driven prior to the placement of the approach embankments. Therefore, to minimize the development of the downdrag loads from embankment fill, the portion of the pile within the embankment should be provided within a bitumen coating or double wrap of polyethylene sheeting according to Section 459 of the FDOT Specifications. Downdrag loads on the concrete piles at the intermediate bent locations are not anticipated so long as filling operations do not occur above the existing grade. 6.5.5 VIBRATION CONSIDERATIONS The FDOT Specifications Section 455 outlines general requirements for the protection of existing structures during pile driving operations. Due to residential properties adjacent to this site, noise and vibrations from pile driving present a possible issue at this site. Vibration considerations exist but are believed to be less critical than noise impacts due to the distance to existing structures. To reduce the potential for problems with noise impacts, alternative powered hammers (air, steam, hydraulic) along with perimeter curtains could be used. Disturbances can also be minimized by limiting the hours of the pile driving operation. 6.5.6 PREFORMING Due to the relatively shallow hard limestone which may result in refusal and possible damage to driven piles, we anticipate pre -forming to the bottom of the hard limestone layers will be necessary. If this results in driven piles being less feasible, we can evaluate drilled shafts as an alternative at a later time. 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATION Corrosion parameter tests were performed on two (2) soil samples, one obtained from each soil boring, as well as a water sample obtained from Cypress Canal. Test results obtained are presented in Table 1 — Summary of Environmental Classification Testing, Appendix B. According to FDOT Structure Design Guideline 1.3.2.113.1, the superstructure is classified as slightly aggressive and the substructure is classified as moderately aggressive for contact with steel structures and slightly aggressive for contact with concrete structures. 8.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our preliminary recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This company is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based on these data. M& r & Assoc aeman Jacobs November 29, 2021 Ardaman Project No. 21-33-4561 Page 8 of 13 The preliminary analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the anticipated location and type of construction and the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated. The data within this report does not reflect any variations which may occur among these borings. If any variations become evident during the course of construction, a re-evaluation of the recommendations contained in this report will be necessary after we have had an opportunity to observe the characteristics of the conditions encountered. When final design plans and specifications are available, our office would like the chance to review the applicability of this report and perform any further analyses required. The scope of our services does not include any environmental assessment or investigation for the presence or absence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater or surface water within or beyond the site studied. Any statements in this report regarding odors, staining of soils or other unusual conditions observed are strictly for the information of our client. M& r & Assoc aeman APPENDIX A rdaman & Associates. Inc. _ . _ % _{� �:� •� , ? R __ ., ._ � `�'* — wok —rtARcnaoll $itid ,. 1_ `1�+_ Randall�Bsvtl �--- —•FrT ",." Immokalee•Rd _ _ lmmakl aee�Rd lt4 _� �. ' J.� Y T zl " ` ' � � - • '- Y .. i1. - r , i ' - -�.�I tj :r er Ilk �-Gclden'Gate'131tid'W ' 7 is te°B6&VV- IGcl� Cate•SIod�E. _ Golden ate•�vd'E GclvernGa�e'Blvd Vti+ Ccldery Y I{[{ s= + I y REFERENCE:G000LE EARTH PRO 2021, IMAGERY DATED 112021 LEGEND APPROXIMATE SCALE APPROXIMATE CONTRACT AREA BOUNDARY I SOIL MAP AREA BOUNDARY 0. SOIL SURVEY MAP Jill- Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants -=ON PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WILSON BLVD OVER CYPRESS CANAL NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DAIS SL CS 11/29/2021 FILE N0. APPRM BY: FIGURE: 2 21-33-4561 1 IS BDATE 111 00021 DRILLER R. LO``KLEY r HAMMER AUTO RIG MOBILE B-57 LAT: N 2614'47.19" LONG: W 81.36'25.13" e 0 B Fine SAND ith some rock fragments r0) 11 Slightly clayey silty fine SAND (SM) EZ 50/0" 5 5010 50/0" Hard LIMESTONE h I 50/0" '" . �- �` • , ` 10 -200= 20.7 42 Silty soft weathered LIMESTONE 17 I -� LL = NP 15 I I I PI = NP I I 5ilty fine SAN with some rock III fragments (SM� 20 14 25 49 1 Silty soft weathered LIMESTONE 30 35 e -200= 15.5 I I I Gravelly silty fine SAND (SM) 35 161 I I � I I z I I 40 611I Silty fine SAND, with some rock F a I I fragments (SM) 9111 - I 45 _200= 22.8 I I I s 50 20 Silty soft weathered LIMESTONE APPROXIMATE SCALE WOH / 55 Silty clayey fine SAND (SC-SM) / 0' 40 80 60 -200= 48.4 WOH / LL=21 PI=6 / 65 LL = 27 WO / Clayey fine SAND (SC) PI = 12 / 70 WOH / LEGEND: / Silty clayey fine SAND with 75 2 / trace rock fragments (SC -SM) SAND - Sand with < 12% fines / I I I I Silty SAND - Sand with 12% to 50% Silt 80 2 / III Hard LIMESTONE - Limestone with N > 50 27 85 I I I III Gravelly silty fine SAND (SM) Soft LIMESTONE - Limestone with N S 50 I I 90 22 Clayey SAND - Sand with 12% to 50% Clay ® GravellySAND - Sand with >30% ravel 95 25 9 Silty soft weathered LIMESTONE Sandy CLAY - Clay with >30% sand 30 100 BORING TERMINATED AT DEPTH 100' 25' OF CASING BDATE 81%9`2021 0 DRILLER HAMMER RIG LAT. LONG: N 28 10 SZ 8 R. AUTO MOBILE N W LOcc KLEY B-57 2614'46.15" 81'36'25.26" Sli htl silty fine Wgq with trace rock fragments (SP— M) Silty soft weathered LIMESTONE 5 50/0" 50/0" Hard LIMESTONE 50/0" 10-50/ 3 3 Soft weathered LIMESTONE 2 15 2 Gravelly fine SAND (SP) 20 15 Silty fine SAND (SM) I I I 25 36 1 I I I I Gravelly silty fine SAND (SM) 30 26 Silty soft weathered LIMESTONE 35 WOH I I i I i Silty fine SAND (SM) z 40 -200= 28.1 2 Sg f ilty %tsSAN,� with trace rock I I I I I a 0 45 25 Silty soft weathered LIMESTONE I I I I I I I 1 50 -200= 29.7 7 gllty fine SAN with trace rock fragments (Sf� 55 iIII 60 - 24 Sandy CLAY (CL) = R WOH 65 NOTES. 1. UPON COMPLETION OF EACH SPT BORING, THE BOREHOLE WAS GROUTED WITH CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY. 2. ALL SPT BORINGS WERE PERFORMED USING AN AUTOMATIC HAMMER TO THE BORING TERMINATION DEPTH 3. GEOGRAPHICAL GPS COORDINATE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING A 4 SATELLITE MINIMUM AUTONOMOUS SOLUTION FROM A WAAS HAND HELD GPS UNIT. 4. THE BORING LOGS SHOWN REPRESENT SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS WITHIN THE BOREHOLE AT THE TIME OF DRILLING. 5. NO WARRANTY AS TO THE SUBSURFACE CONDITION, STRATA DEPTH OF SOIL CONSISTENCY BETWEEN OR OUTSIDE BORING LOCATIONS IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THIS DRAWING. 6. WHILE THE BORINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THEIR RESPECTIVE LOCATIONS AND FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE VERTICAL REACHES, LOCAL VARIATIONS CHARACTERISTIC OF THE SUBSURFACE MATERIALS OF THE REGION ARE ANTICIPATED AND MAY BE ENCOUNTERED. 7. THE BORING LOGS AND RELATED INFORMATION ARE BASED ON THE DRILLER'S LOGS AND VISUAL EXAMINATION OF SELECTED SAMPLES IN THE LABORATORY. THE DELINEATION BETWEEN SOIL TYPES SHOWN ON THE LOGS IS APPROXIMATE AND THE DESCRIPTION REPRESENTS OUR INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE DESIGNATED BORING LOCATIONS ON THE PARTICULAR DATE DRILLED. 8. GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE BORING LOGS REPRESENT GROUNDWATER SURFACES ENCOUNTERED ON THE DATES SHOWN. FLUCTUATIONS IN WATER TABLE LEVELS SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR SZ - Water Table existing at time of boring * - SPT Boring Location N - Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows per Foot -200 - Percent Passing the 1200 Standard Sieve LL - Liquid Limit PI - Plasticity Index SP - Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2487) 5,0 - 50 Blows for 2-inches penetration into soil II II - Temporary Steel Casing 400 - Loss of drilling fluid circulation WOH - Advanced by static weight of rods and hammer ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATION Superstructure - Slightly Aggressive Substructure - Moderately Aggressive (Steel) Slightly Aggressive (Concrete) CORROSION SERIES TEST RESULTS Resistivity Chlorides Sulfate Ohms - cm m pm H 15,780 - 27,660 (Soil) 3,207 30 BDL 7.3 (Water) 2 Sandy CLAY with trace rock fragments 70 ( 75 3 SCa,Lr y CLAY with some rock fragments s ( JJ ICI 85 1711I III 90 19 I I I Gravelly silty fine SAND (SM) I I 95 26 III 111 100L 5 BORING TERMINATED AT DEPTH 100' 68' OF CASING GRANULAR MATERIALS Safety Hammer Automatic Hammer SPT N-Value SPT N-Value Relative Density Blows/Foot Blows/Foot Very Loose Less than 4 Less than 3 Loose 4 - 10 3 - 8 Medium Dense 10 - 30 8 - 24 Dense 30 - 50 24 - 40 Very Dense Greater than 50 Greater than 40 SILTS AND CLAYS Safety Hammer Automatic Hammer SPT N-Value SPT N-Value Consistency Blows/Foot Blows/Foot Very Soft Less than 2 Less than 1 Soft 2 - 4 1 - 3 Firm 4 - 8 3 - 6 Stiff 8 - 15 6 - 12 Very Stiff 15 - 30 12 - 24 Hard Greater than 30 Greater than 24 REVISIONS SL 11/ BY: REPORT OF CORE BORINGS FOR ENGINEER OF RECORD: sl_ 11/2021 FIGURE DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE BY DESCRIPTION IVAN SOKOLIC, P.E. NO. 64114 CHECKED BY: JACOBS ARDAMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. cs 11/2021 BRIDGE STRUCTURES No. 9970 BAVARIA ROAD DESIGNED BY: ROAD NO. COUNTY FINANCIAL PROJECT NO. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33913 WILSON BLVD. OVER CYPRESS CANAL --- CHECKED BY: WILSON BLVD N COLLIER - - - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Schulte, Cory 11 29 2021 6.06 PM G: Ceotechnical Projects 2019 19-33-4563 Kimley—Hom — Proposed Bridge over Cocoplun Waterway APPENDIX B rdaman & Associates. Inc. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100 Project Name: Project Location: Client Name: GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE (V N W O O O O O O O O n N M V VO (O w N N (� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) N N M P7 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 10 1 0.1 Grain Size (mm) 0.01 0.001 GRAVEL I SAND SILT CLAY Coarse to Medium Fine Sample Depth: 12 - 13.5' Sample Description: Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve = Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Naples, Collier County, Florida Jacobs Boring Number: B-01 fine SAND with some rock fragments (SM Figure Number: 4 N" ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE _ (M N (V N O M P7 Z o o 0 0 00 00 N M V �O (O w O O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z o 0 N N O O Z Z 100% 90% 80% 70% s= .N 60% M a 50% i 40% W a 30% 20% 10% tt O% _J_ _J___ 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size (mm) GRAVEL Project Name: Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Figure Number: Project Location: Naples, Collier County, Florida 5 — Client Name: Jacobs WAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Sample Depth: 28.5 - 30' Boring Number: B-01 Geotechnical, Environmental and Sample Description: Gravelly silty fine SAND (SM) Materials Consultants Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve = 15.5% SAND SILT CLAY Coarse to Medium Fine 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100 Project Name: Project Location: Client Name: GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE (V N W O O O O O O O O n N M V VO (O w N N (� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) N N M P7 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 10 1 0.1 Grain Size (mm) 0.01 0.001 GRAVEL I SAND SILT CLAY Coarse to Medium Fine Sample Depth: 43.5 - 45' Sample Description: Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve = Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Naples, Collier County, Florida Jacobs Boring Number: B-01 fine SAND with some rock fragments (SM Figure Number: 6 —� WAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100 Project Name: Project Location: Client Name: GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE (V N W O O O O O O O O n N M V VO (O w N N (� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) N N M P7 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 10 1 0.1 Grain Size (mm) 0.01 0.001 GRAVEL I SAND SILT CLAY Coarse to Medium Fine Sample Depth: 48.5 - 50' Sample Description: Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve = Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Naples, Collier County, Florida Jacobs Boring Number: B-02 fine SAND with trace rock fragments (SM Figure Number: 7 —� WAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATION TESTING PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WILSON BLVD. OVER CYPRESS CANAL NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FDOT Environmental Classification Location Depth Resistivity Chlorides Sulfates pH (Feet) (ohm -cm) (ppm) (ppm) Steel Concrete Canal 3,207 30 BDL 7.3 Moderately Slightly Water Aggressive Aggressive B-01 1.5 - 2 27,660 BDL BDL 8.3 Slightly Slightly Aggressive Aggressive B-02 1.5 - 2 15,780 BDL 3 8 5 Slightly Slightly Aggressive Aggressive BDL: Below Detectable Levels APPENDIX C rdaman & Associates. Inc. Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Collier County, Florida SPT Borinz B-01 --- Precast Prestressed Concrete Piles --- Estimated Nominal Bearing Resistance (tons) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 20 10 0 -10 -20 0 0 w -30 ti W R -40 -50 0. -60 -70 -80 -90 18" PSC f24" PSC LRFD Estimated Factored Axial Pile Capacities Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Collier County, Florida DRAWN SCALE PROJ. NO. CS NOTED 21-33-4561 CHECKED 1):AIF IS 11/29/2021 PLATE 1 m0r:8-Ardaman MMAMIL cia#es. Inc. Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Collier County, Florida SPT Borinz B-02 --- Precast Prestressed Concrete Piles --- Estimated Nominal Bearing Resistance (tons) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 20 10 0 -10 -20 0 0 w -30 ti W R -40 -50 0. -60 -70 -80 -90 18" PSC f24" PSC LRFD Estimated Factored Axial Pile Capacities Proposed Wilson Blvd. Bridge Replacement Collier County, Florida DRAWN SCALE PROJ. NO. CS NOTED 21-33-4561 CHECKED 1):AIF IS 11/29/2021 PLATE 2 m0r:8-Ardaman MMAMIL cia#es. Inc. APPENDIX D rdaman & Associates. Inc. Florida Bridge Software Institute Shaft and Pile Analysis (FB-Deep v.3.0.0) Date: November 29, 2021 Time: 17:56:44 General Information: -------------------- -------------------- Input file: .....son Blvd, Collier Co\05 Calcs & Analyses\B-01 18-in. Driven.in Project number: 21-33-4561 Job name: Wilson Blvd. Bridge Engineer: C. Schulte Units: English Analysis Information: --------------------- --------------------- Analysis Type: SPT Soil Information: ----------------- ----------------- Boring date: 11/8/21, Boring Number: B-01 Station number: N/A Offset: N/A Ground Elevation: 13.000(ft) Hammer type: Automatic Hammer, Correction factor = 1.24 ID Depth ----- (ft) ------------ 1 0.00 2 9.00 3 10.50 4 12.00 5 13.50 6 17.00 7 21.00 8 27.00 9 31.00 10 37.00 11 41.00 12 47.00 13 51.00 14 57.00 15 61.00 16 67.00 17 71.00 18 77.00 19 81.00 No. of Blows Soil Type (Blows/ft) ------------- ------------------------------- 0.00 5- Cavity layer 0.00 5- Cavity layer 42.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 22.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 17.00 2- Clay and silty sand 3.00 2- Clay and silty sand 14.00 2- Clay and silty sand 49.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 35.00 2- Clay and silty sand 16.00 2- Clay and silty sand 8.00 2- Clay and silty sand 9.00 2- Clay and silty sand 20.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 2.00 2- Clay and silty sand 2.00 2- Clay and silty sand 20 87.00 27.00 2- Clay and silty sand 21 91.00 22.00 2- Clay and silty sand 22 97.00 25.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 23 102.00 30.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand Blowcount Average Per Soil Layer ---------------------------------- Layer Starting Bottom Thickness Average Soil Type Num. Elevation Elevation Blowcount ----- (ft) ---------- (ft) ---------- (ft) ---------- (Blows/ft) ------------- --------------------------------- 1 13.00 2.50 10.50 0.00 5-Void 2 2.50 -0.50 3.00 32.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand 3 -0.50 -14.00 13.50 11.52 2-Clay and Silty Sand 4 -14.00 -18.00 4.00 49.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand 5 -18.00 -38.00 20.00 17.90 2-Clay and Silty Sand 6 -38.00 -44.00 6.00 20.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand 7 -44.00 -84.00 40.00 6.50 2-Clay and Silty Sand 8 -84.00 -89.00 5.00 25.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand Driven Pile Data: ----------------- ----------------- Pile unit weight = 150.00(pcf), Section Type: Square Pile Geometry: Width Length Tip Elev. (in) -------------------- (ft) (ft) ---------- 18.00 10.00 3.00 18.00 15.00 -2.00 18.00 20.00 -7.00 18.00 25.00 -12.00 18.00 30.00 -17.00 18.00 35.00 -22.00 18.00 40.00 -27.00 18.00 45.00 -32.00 18.00 50.00 -37.00 18.00 55.00 -42.00 18.00 60.00 -47.00 18.00 65.00 -52.00 18.00 70.00 -57.00 18.00 75.00 -62.00 18.00 80.00 -67.00 18.00 85.00 -72.00 18.00 90.00 -77.00 18.00 95.00 -82.00 18.00 100.00 -87.00 Driven Pile Capacity: --------------------- --------------------- Section Type: Square Pile Width: 18.00 (in) Test Pile Ultimate Mobilized Estimated Allowable Ultimate Pile Width Side End Davisson Pile Pile Length Friction Bearing Capacity Capacity Capacity (ft) ----- (in) ------ (tons) ---------- (tons) ---------- (tons) -------------------- (tons) (tons) ---------- 10.00 18.0 1.04 0.00 1.04 0.52 1.04 15.00 18.0 15.85 13.41 29.26 14.63 56.08 20.00 18.0 23.45 32.94 56.38 28.19 122.26 25.00 18.0 42.35 67.86 110.22 55.11 245.95 30.00 18.0 70.63 43.98 114.61 57.30 202.56 35.00 18.0 104.14 32.63 136.77 68.38 202.03 40.00 18.0 126.17 22.18 148.35 74.17 192.71 45.00 18.0 139.81 21.57 161.38 80.69 204.51 50.00 18.0 152.58 25.16 177.74 88.87 228.06 55.00 18.0 158.21 2.66 160.87 80.44 166.19 60.00 18.0 158.71 0.00 158.71 79.35 158.71 65.00 18.0 158.71 0.00 158.71 79.35 158.71 70.00 18.0 158.71 0.00 158.71 79.35 158.71 75.00 18.0 158.71 0.00 158.71 79.35 158.71 80.00 18.0 158.71 5.76 164.47 82.23 175.99 85.00 18.0 167.65 20.11 187.76 93.88 227.98 90.00 18.0 198.05 30.23 228.29 114.14 288.75 95.00 18.0 222.30 48.68 270.98 135.49 368.34 100.00 18.0 Soil Elevations Must Extend At or Below Contribution Zone NOTES 1. MOBILIZED END BEARING IS 1/3 OF THE ORIGINAL RB-121 VALUES. 2. DAVISSON PILE CAPACITY IS AN ESTIMATE BASED ON FAILURE CRITERIA, AND EQUALS ULTIMATE SIDE FRICTION PLUS MOBILIZED END BEARING. 3. ALLOWABLE PILE CAPACITY IS 1/2 THE DAVISSON PILE CAPACITY. 4. ULTIMATE PILE CAPACITY IS ULTIMATE SIDE FRICTION PLUS 3 x THE MOBILIZED END BEARING. EXCEPTION: FOR H-PILES TIPPED IN SAND OR LIMESTONE, THE ULTIMATE PILE CAPACITY IS ULTIMATE SIDE FRICTION PLUS 2 x THE MOBILIZED END BEARING. Florida Bridge Software Institute Shaft and Pile Analysis (FB-Deep v.3.0.0) Date: November 29, 2021 Time: 17:58:34 General Information: -------------------- -------------------- Input file: .....son Blvd, Collier Co\05 Calcs & Analyses\B-01 24-in. Driven.in Project number: 21-33-4561 Job name: Wilson Blvd. Bridge Engineer: C. Schulte Units: English Analysis Information: --------------------- --------------------- Analysis Type: SPT Soil Information: ----------------- ----------------- Boring date: 11/8/21, Boring Number: B-01 Station number: N/A Offset: N/A Ground Elevation: 13.000(ft) Hammer type: Automatic Hammer, Correction factor = 1.24 ID Depth ----- (ft) ------------ 1 0.00 2 9.00 3 10.50 4 12.00 5 13.50 6 17.00 7 21.00 8 27.00 9 31.00 10 37.00 11 41.00 12 47.00 13 51.00 14 57.00 15 61.00 16 67.00 17 71.00 18 77.00 19 81.00 No. of Blows Soil Type (Blows/ft) ------------- ------------------------------- 0.00 5- Cavity layer 0.00 5- Cavity layer 42.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 22.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 17.00 2- Clay and silty sand 3.00 2- Clay and silty sand 14.00 2- Clay and silty sand 49.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 35.00 2- Clay and silty sand 16.00 2- Clay and silty sand 8.00 2- Clay and silty sand 9.00 2- Clay and silty sand 20.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 0.00 2- Clay and silty sand 2.00 2- Clay and silty sand 2.00 2- Clay and silty sand 20 87.00 27.00 2- Clay and silty sand 21 91.00 22.00 2- Clay and silty sand 22 97.00 25.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand 23 102.00 30.00 4- Lime Stone/Very shelly sand Blowcount Average Per Soil Layer ---------------------------------- Layer Starting Bottom Thickness Average Soil Type Num. Elevation Elevation Blowcount ----- (ft) ---------- (ft) ---------- (ft) ---------- (Blows/ft) ------------- --------------------------------- 1 13.00 2.50 10.50 0.00 5-Void 2 2.50 -0.50 3.00 32.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand 3 -0.50 -14.00 13.50 11.52 2-Clay and Silty Sand 4 -14.00 -18.00 4.00 49.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand 5 -18.00 -38.00 20.00 17.90 2-Clay and Silty Sand 6 -38.00 -44.00 6.00 20.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand 7 -44.00 -84.00 40.00 6.50 2-Clay and Silty Sand 8 -84.00 -89.00 5.00 25.00 4-Limestone, Very Shelly Sand Driven Pile Data: ----------------- ----------------- Pile unit weight = 150.00(pcf), Section Type: Square Pile Geometry: Width Length Tip Elev. (in) -------------------- (ft) (ft) ---------- 24.00 10.00 3.00 24.00 15.00 -2.00 24.00 20.00 -7.00 24.00 25.00 -12.00 24.00 30.00 -17.00 24.00 35.00 -22.00 24.00 40.00 -27.00 24.00 45.00 -32.00 24.00 50.00 -37.00 24.00 55.00 -42.00 24.00 60.00 -47.00 24.00 65.00 -52.00 24.00 70.00 -57.00 24.00 75.00 -62.00 24.00 80.00 -67.00 24.00 85.00 -72.00 24.00 90.00 -77.00 24.00 95.00 -82.00 24.00 100.00 -87.00 Driven Pile Capacity: --------------------- --------------------- Section Type: Square Pile Width: 24.00 (in) Test Pile Ultimate Mobilized Estimated Allowable Ultimate Pile Width Side End Davisson Pile Pile Length Friction Bearing Capacity Capacity Capacity (ft) ----- (in) ------ (tons) ---------- (tons) ---------- (tons) -------------------- (tons) (tons) ---------- 10.00 24.0 1.39 0.00 1.39 0.69 1.39 15.00 24.0 22.29 29.50 51.79 25.89 110.79 20.00 24.0 29.11 64.76 93.86 46.93 223.38 25.00 24.0 51.99 109.01 161.00 80.50 379.02 30.00 24.0 94.18 69.41 163.59 81.79 302.40 35.00 24.0 138.85 55.76 194.60 97.30 306.12 40.00 24.0 168.23 39.55 207.78 103.89 286.89 45.00 24.0 186.41 46.61 233.02 116.51 326.24 50.00 24.0 203.44 41.49 244.93 122.46 327.90 55.00 24.0 210.95 3.55 214.49 107.25 221.59 60.00 24.0 211.61 0.00 211.61 105.80 211.61 65.00 24.0 211.61 0.00 211.61 105.80 211.61 70.00 24.0 211.61 0.00 211.61 105.80 211.61 75.00 24.0 211.61 0.43 212.03 106.02 212.88 80.00 24.0 211.61 15.31 226.91 113.46 257.52 85.00 24.0 223.53 34.45 257.99 128.99 326.90 90.00 24.0 264.07 52.99 317.06 158.53 423.04 95.00 24.0 296.40 81.81 378.20 189.10 541.82 100.00 24.0 Soil Elevations Must Extend At or Below Contribution Zone NOTES 1. MOBILIZED END BEARING IS 1/3 OF THE ORIGINAL RB-121 VALUES. 2. DAVISSON PILE CAPACITY IS AN ESTIMATE BASED ON FAILURE CRITERIA, AND EQUALS ULTIMATE SIDE FRICTION PLUS MOBILIZED END BEARING. 3. ALLOWABLE PILE CAPACITY IS 1/2 THE DAVISSON PILE CAPACITY. 4. ULTIMATE PILE CAPACITY IS ULTIMATE SIDE FRICTION PLUS 3 x THE MOBILIZED END BEARING. EXCEPTION: FOR H-PILES TIPPED IN SAND OR LIMESTONE, THE ULTIMATE PILE CAPACITY IS ULTIMATE SIDE FRICTION PLUS 2 x THE MOBILIZED END BEARING. APPENDIX E rdaman & Associates. Inc. SOIL BORING, SAMPLING AND TESTING METHODS PROJECT SOIL DESCRIPTION PROCEDURE - UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) Ardaman & Associates, Inc. SOIL BORING, SAMPLING AND TESTING METHODS HAND AUGER BORINGS Hand auger boring samples are obtained by simultaneously pressing and turning a bucket auger into the ground. After the bucket auger cuts 6 inches into the ground, the tool is withdrawn and the bucket contents examined. Although the sample is mixed, it is sufficient for identification and classification. The bucket auger is advanced 6 inches at a time, until the boring is terminated. Upon completion, each borehole was filled in with borehole cuttings and local soil. STANDARD PENETRATION TEST The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is a widely accepted method of in -situ testing of foundation soils (ASTM D-1586). A 2 ft (0.6 m) long, 2 in (50 mm) O.D. split -barrel sampler attached to the end of a string of drilling rods is driven 18 in (0.45 m) into the ground by successive blows of a 140 lb (63.5 Kg) hammer freely dropping 30 in (0.76 m). The number of blows needed for each 6 in (0.15 m) of penetration is recorded. The sum of the blows required for penetration of the second and third 6 in (0.15 m) increments penetration constitutes the test result or N-value. After the test, the sampler is extracted from the ground and opened to allow visual description of the retained soil sample. The N-value has been empirically correlated with various soil properties allowing a conservative estimate of the behavior of soils under load. The following tables relate N-values to a qualitative description of soil density and, for cohesive soils, an approximate unconfined compressive strength (Qu): Cohesionless Soils: N-Value N-Value Safety Hammer Auto Hammer Description Relative Density < 4 < 3 Very loose 0 - 15% 4-10 3-8 Loose 15-35% 11 - 30 9 - 24 Medium dense 35 - 65% 31 - 50 25 - 40 Dense 65 - 85% > 50 > 40 Very dense 85 - 100% Cohesive Soils: N-Value N-Value Unconfined Compressive Safety Hammer Auto Hammer Description Strength, Qu < 2 < 1 Very soft < 0.25 tsf (25 kPa) 2-4 1 - 3 Soft 0.25 - 0.50 tsf (25 - 50 kPa) 5-8 4-6 Firm 0.50-1.0tsf (50-100kPa) 9 - 15 7 - 12 Stiff 1.0 - 2.0 tsf (100 - 200 kPa) 16 - 30 13 - 24 Very stiff 2.0 - 4.0 tsf (200 - 400 kPa) > 30 > 24 Hard > 4.0 tsf (400 kPa) The tests are usually performed at 5 ft (1.5 m) intervals. However, more frequent or continuous testing is done by our firm through depths where a more accurate definition of the soils is required. The test holes are advanced to the test elevations by rotary drilling with a cutting bit, using circulating fluid to remove the cuttings and hold the fine grains in suspension. The circulating fluid, which is bentonitic drilling mud, is also used to keep the hole open below the water table by maintaining an excess hydrostatic pressure inside the hole. In some soil deposits, particularly highly pervious ones, flush -coupled casing must be driven to just above the testing depth to keep the hole open and/or prevent the loss of circulating fluid. After completion of a test boring, the hole is kept open until a steady state groundwater level is recorded. The hole is then sealed by backfilling with neat cement. Representative split -spoon samples from each sampling interval and from different strata are brought to our laboratory in air -tight jars for classification and testing, if necessary. Afterwards, the samples are discarded unless prior arrangements have been made. LABORATORY TEST METHODS Soil samples returned to our laboratory are looked at again by a geotechnical engineer or geotechnician to obtain more accurate descriptions of the soil strata. Laboratory testing is performed on selected samples as deemed necessary to aid in soil classification and to help define engineering properties of the soils. The test results are presented on the soil boring logs at the depths at which the respective sample was recovered, except that grain -size distributions or selected other test results may be presented on separate tables, figures or plates as discussed in this report, the results of which will be located in an Appendix. The soil descriptions shown on the logs are based upon visual -manual procedures in accordance with local practice. Soil classification is in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487) and is also based on visual -manual procedures. THE PROJECT SOIL DESCRIPTION PROCEDURE FOR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA fly For use with the ASTM D-2487 Unified Soil Classification System CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES BOULDERS (>12 in [300 mml) and COBBLES (3 in [75 mml to 12 in [300 mml): GRAVEL: Coarse Gravel: % in (19 mm) to 3 in (75 mm) Fine Gravel: No. 4 (4.75 mm) Sieve to % in (19 mm) Descriptive Adjectives: 0 - 5% --- no mention of gravel in description 6 -15% --- trace 16 - 29% --- some 30 - 49% --- gravelly (shell, limerock, cemented sands) SANDS: Coarse Sand: No. 10 (2 mm) Sieve to No. 4 (4.75 mm) Sieve Medium sand: No. 40 (425 /im) Sieve to No. 10 (2 mm) Sieve Fine sand: No. 200 (75 /im) Sieve to No. 40 (425 jim) Sieve Descriptive Adjectives: 0 - 5% --- no mention of sand in description 6 -15% --- trace 16 - 29% --- some 30 - 49% --- sandy SILT/CLAY: <#200 (75 pm) Sieve Silty or Silt: PI < 4 Silty Clayey or Silty Clay: 4 <- PI <- 7 Clayey or Clay: PI > 7 Descriptive Adiectives: 0-5% 6 -15% 16 - 29% 30 - 49% ORGANIC SOILS: Oraanic Content 0 - 2.5% 2.6 - 5% >5 - 20% 20-75% >75% clean (no mention of silt or clay in description) slightly clayey, silty, or silty clayey very Descriptive Adiectives: no mention of organics in description slightly organic organic highly organic sand or muck sandy peat fibrous peat STRATIFICATION AND STRUCTURE: Descriptive Term: Thickness: seam: less than % in (13 mm) thick layer: % to 12 in (13 to 300 mm) thick stratum: more than 12 in (300 mm) thick pocket: small, erratic deposit, usually less than 1 ft occasional: 1 or less per ft of thickness ROCK CLASSIFICATION: Description: Hard Limestone or Caprock: N-values >50 bpf Soft Weathered Limestone: N-values <50 bpf Classification: see above see above add "with organic fines" to group name Peat (PT) Peat (PT) Descriptive Term: Thickness: frequent: more than 1 per ft of thickness calcareous: containing calcium carbonate (reaction to diluted HCL) hardpan: spodic horizon usually medium dense marl: mixture of carbonate clays, silts, shells and sands. (1) This soil description procedure was developed specifically for projects in southwest Florida because it is believed that the terminology will be better understood as a result of local practice. It is not intended to supplant other visual -manual classification procedures fordescription and identification of soils such as ASTM D-2488. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM D-2487) Soil Classification Group Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests symbol Group Name Gravels: Clean Gravels: CU}4and 1<Cy<3E GW Well graded gravelr More than 50%of Less than5%finesc C s4and/or1>Ct}3r GP Poorly graded gravel coarsefractian retained Gravels with -tines: Finesclassify as ML or MH GM SiltygravelF's" CoarseGra1nedSol Is: anNa.4sieve Morethan12%finesc Fines cIassifyasCLorCH GC Clayey gravel r'c4 More than 50%retained on No_ 200 sieve Sands: Clean Sands: CU 2 6 and 15053E SW Well graded sand' 50%or more of coarse Less than 5%fines° C_ <6 and/or 1>Ct> 3E SIR Poorly graded sand fraction passes No_ 4 Sandswit h Fines: Fines classify as ML or MH SM Siltysand'" sieve More than 12%fines° Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sands4" PI > 7 and plats on or above "A" line CL Lean clay"Inorganic: Sits and Clays: PI <4 or plots below "A" line ML SOIL-, Liquid limit less than 50 Liquid limit - oven dried (<O.75) OIL Organic clayKAWA Fine Grained Sail: Organic: Liquid limit- not dried (<0.75) OIL Organic siltx" 50%ar more passes the No- 200sieve Inorganic: PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clayK Silts and Clays: PI plots below "A" line MH ElasticsiliK" Liquid limit 50 or more Liquid limit -oven dried (<0.75) OH Organic clayK"R Organic: Liquid limit -notdried(<0.75) OH Organic claycu".o g Highly organic soils: Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3-in (75-mm) sieve. B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. cGravels with 5 to 12%fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well graded gravel with clay, GP - GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP -GC poorly graded gravel with clay. DSands with 5 to 12%fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well graded sand with silt, SW -SC well graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay E Cu = 06o/0io Cc = ID,)z D xD r 60 If soil contains >_ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. e If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC -GM or SC-SM. 60 50 :1 x 40 IJ Z 30 U_ H Q 20 J a 10 7 For classification of fine-grained soils and fine-grained fraction of coarse -grained soils Equation of "A" - line Horizontal at PI=4 to LL=25.5, then PI=0.73 (ILL - 20) Equation of "U" - line Vertical at LL=16 to PI=7, then PI=0.9 (LL - S) H If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. If soil contains >_ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. ' If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. K If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. L If soil contains >_ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name. m If soil contains >_ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name. N PI >_ 4 and plots on or above "A" line. 0 PI < 4 or plots below "A" line. P PI plots on or above "A" line. 4PI plots below "A" line. 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 LIQUID LIMIT (LL) Appendix C Natural Resources Data Ir r; 5 S u # } r •L 4h� •'�' I J•'�M1 rr - 5 1 ~ L AFAI Aff RP Y L 5 dim 11—Wi s Soil ID Soil Type WI' ; 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 105 Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 117 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 128 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 131 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes *r County Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Natural Resource Conservation Seri Legend Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Parcel Boundary =1 Pond Sites Evaluated lr � 1 A-28 o 1 r l 1. LF r u ' F '{ •_ Y L F ,.+sacs c r. r Hydric Soils z�" 0 175 350 Non-hydric Soils = Feet .. �• � �1 is ` "q,lop`.�F5� 1 .I, 1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Soils Map Page 1 of 12 December 2021 VlE17 il ID Soil Type Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 128 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 131 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes ftr County Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Natural Resource Conservation Seri Legend Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Hydric Soils z 0 175 350 Parcel Boundary =1 Pond Sites Evaluated Non-hydric Soils = Feet Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Soils Map Page 2 of 12 December 2021 *r County Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Legend Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated z Hydric Soils 0 175 350 Non-hydric Soils Feet Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Soils Map Page 3 of 12 December 2021 VT l R: L S IS J +h LTS f J : � } Cn 3 LU `�J� � A 1 F � 4 i Y •� •} Y 1 { S . S{ Soil ID Soil Type s 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 105 Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 117 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 128 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 131 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes C;OLegend *r County Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Parcel Boundary =1 Pond Sites Evaluatec Natural Resource Conservation Service 2021 . r�n�'yl 4T+ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Hydric Soils Z)�'Soils Map 0 175 350 Page 4 of 12 Non-hydric Soils = Feet December 2021 . r „ • : D r •4�.• r ,y%�y�M,n ._T).VIM _ Soil ID Soil Type 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 105 Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 117 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 128 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 131 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes C;O*Blr C01414ty Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Natural Resource Conservation Seri Legend Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Parcel Boundary =1 Pond Sites Evaluated Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Hydric Soils Z)--,Soils Map 0 175 350 Page 5 of 12 Non-hydric Soils Feet December 2021 131 - �• 5 l F 12 0 � ' ` Cj■F _ - - --- - Q .• r - M1L 41 t t• � •2 � r h •• � ,-Ilrr '+ �.��. 14 o 125 k ++ } r % , IAN LJ - V • �It_ 1111�1. II�G •- Fcr - L ' F-, #-_ ■y y JAL F• > • i I 7 `.p - .} 5 N Basin � � S� y i � 1 �' •=r i Soil ID Soil Type 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 4 � 105 Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ': 117 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 ••; 7' - _ 1 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes R1• 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes .i 128 Pineda fine limestone land 0 to 2 Y. �' �� -� � ; sand, substratum -Urban complex, percent slopes M1 F • L 131 Riviera fine sand limestone substratum -Urban land association 0 to 2 percent slopes p p - i - _ Legend Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study C.o*e,-r County Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Hydric Soils z� 0 175 350 Soils Map Page 6 of 12 Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Parcel Boundary =1 Pond Sites Evaluated Non-hydric Soils Feet December 2021 Natural Resource Conservation Service (2021). 1 I` 1 I 4}rrt rAwak't I . a� w� - _ � ! - pis �''� `•�. M, I.. r ZrT Soil ID Soil Type 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 105 Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 117 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 128 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 131 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes C;OLegend *r County Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Parcel Boundary =1 Pond Sites Evaluated Natural Resource Conservation Service 2021 . .V A i A ' 1_ :}D•4�' I Y ' r INK, t r Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Hydric Soils zv Soils Map 0 175 350 Page 7 of 12 Non-hydric Soils = Feet December 2021 77 .. Ar-Pil. IVI Soil ID Soil Type 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 105 Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 117 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 128 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 131 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes ftr County Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Natural Resource Conservation Seri Legend Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Parcel Boundary =1 Pond Sites Evaluated eu Jr. F r L 4 Hydric Soils z 0 175 350 Non-hydric Soils = Feet i !r�. �- 4 JALOW Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Soils Map Page 8 of 12 December 2021 *r County Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Legend Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Hydric Soils z 0 170 340 Non-hydric Soils Feet Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Soils Map Page 9 of 12 December 2021 *r County Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Legend Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Hydric Soils z 0 170 340 Non-hydric Soils Feet Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Soils Map Page 10 of 12 December 2021 ' �fJ � - � _ _ •I � i ���'}-- ' f'LJ � X � � � • ~ • � � _ � i '£ jw S. �� R n � .Y'r _ L is � •', If JINX 14 MP 125 r.. J.• _1F •-1 4J' /� l a ) ry•r r fir. n •}' J L • . ' ' •, 'A *• a , �� A& LPN •!�� IN •1'JC1YLLl� � �- � -w; I R I111 � Jr g 47* it — 5 s ` me CII :" } F � •� • 'S ' J x • J + � �� .r� � ' � � r�.l rya -' 1{�� •� r' _ f ;�4 ;.��. #L+� ,��-. nJa r, ��F ' __-l`.� `-JS�� - �i� I y IAwi - # _ _ a �'_ _ 'Jllf f _ _ - L srf--1 N'0_ { Ark f 5 .128 ° , y 9� , 201J r 410 Soil ID Soil Type ' { 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes _ 105 Chobee, limestone land 0 to 1 '�� ' substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban association, percent slopes 1' = „i. ''� ,ti -' 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes -: ' ' ., CO RK'SCREW C�4�N�4L 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes , ��* 117 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes _ 120 Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes _' rF "`�-•IFL ;F 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes �. 128 Pineda fine limestone land 0 to 2 f ^' j+ # ���..102 T sand, substratum -Urban complex, percent slopes .�._ -" —' 131 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes,"" _'"w ^� �. , low , •. -.t .. }.. Legend Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study oftwY County z — Project Boundary 250-foot Buffer Hydric Soils 0 170 340 Soils Ma P Page 11 of 12 Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Non-hydric Soils Natural Resource Conservation Service (2021). Feet December 2021 rF -3 r A. 11►3 -• • J� •5 J � i'• ' 4 Y i ` '"•r L r 4.x ` Ah''t r Y 10 �..� - r ��.. � •s"-�-"y]Qj�a1 t. L �r} of •� �J � � { !. 1�l3 TiR bo PP T � Air.F F OR i��y� J': �1 2�'y°Yi :�L.- '� = ■i�i'!.v' 'r bra;M1 A Y _ U * . to µ ;f JL ICyI ', l ; ] I - '.?L M t "a � � _ 'f Y r 11 F'� 1� T I - • • • { . y� Soil ID soil Type 102 Boca fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes v -- ` �i "•� 105 Chobee, limestone substratum -Dania, ponded-Urban land association, 0 to 1 percent slopes - . _tr 110 Hollandale fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes CORKJSCREW CANAL 113 Holopaw fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes *; 7_: k 117 120 Immokalee fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Malabar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Mom~ :: ,c. ' 'JJ : 125 Oldsmar fine sand -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes *. x•' ` #-� 128 131 -� Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesv Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum Urban land association, 0 to 2 percent slopes �� r ' h ;4 ,. Legend Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study o*e,-r County — Protect Boundary z 250-foot Buffer Hydric Soils 0 170 340 Soils Map Page 12 of 12 Source: Collier County 2021 aerials, Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Non-hydric Soils Feet December 2021 Natural Resource Conservation Service (2021). WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 1-1 Notes: Classify parcel as wetland. Data Point 1: Hydric soil. Data Point 2: Dahoon Holly, Swamp Bay, lots of Brazilian Pepper, and dense understory of Wax Myrtle. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 1 1�-- -4 �a 24th AVE NW 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW 18th AVE N W 161h AVE'NW 14th AVE NW �112th AVE NW 10thAVENW Pond Site 1-1 u 17) �5 N INSET LT Study Boundary Map Data Point 2 INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 1-1 Notes: Classify parcel as wetland. Data Point 3: Young Cypress coming in, as well as Immoka old, dead, and stressed Cypress. Data Point 4: Hydric soil. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 3 f *t i 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW 18th AVE NW cl 16ff AVE"NV1l _Z-4 o Q 14th AVE NW J m 12thAVENW o 10th AVE NW Pond Site 1-1 w z z z Z U) C U) r- M N INSET Study Boundary Map Data Point 4 INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 2-3 Notes: Non-hydric soil. No wetlands within parcel. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected Project Study Limits Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 5 Pa Immobiee' RD 22nd AVE NW 20thAV E N W 18th AVE NW 161h AVE-N W _Z o Q 14th AVE NW J ao 12th AVE NW o 10th AVE NW nd Site 2-3 INSET Z Z Z Z � U) � M C N N Study Boundary Map .1 INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Basin 3 Removed Site Notes: Habitat photos. Area within future Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension limits. Section of pond site is wetland. Photo Date: 10/1/21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits 0 Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 6 _Imp RD- 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW 18th AVE NW — IT, 16th AVE NW z I 14th AVE NW m 12th AVE NW 10th AVE NW Basin 3 ' Removed Sitn 3: z co V) U) N I 2 V N Lf�7 M 450 Legend * 0 Data Collection Point Roads 110 FLUCCS Boundary 4 QPond Sites Evaluated K►J�a 110 450 8140� Data Point 6 i4Lo fi1624 ISET T19,0 ?�38� 0 450 � m w o z 0 N CD ti 110110�` 7 "0 175 350 A�Q Feet Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Iya Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror %Jacobs � t' to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. G� M..W" O.P � WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Basin 4 Removed Site 2 Notes: Property under construction for new home. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 22nd AVE NW AVE NW Basin 4 Removed Site 2 VE NW 16th AV z [INSET LI 14ihAVE NW 12MAVENW o z Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected Project Study Limits Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 7 3:1 3: �> 3: w z z z z z Cn C ) In M rn 6 I N N Study Boundary Map 110 411`- Data Point 7 ' Legend O Data Collection Point — Roads FLUCCS Boundary OPond Sites Evaluated 'S 110 1 1- 451''� "�"''"� - N r. 11.0 1'4tMAVE NE i 175 350 1110 t 110 Feet INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Basin 4 Removed Site 3 Notes: Pine with understory of Sabal Palm, Brazilian Pepper, Myrsine. Non-hydric soil. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 22nd AVE NW Basin 4 AVE NW Removed Site 3 E NW Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 8 EE,� INSET 14thAVENW 12thAVENW Ih0thAVE NW 5 3:1 3:�> 3: w Z z z Z Z In M rn 6 � N N Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jlacob& _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Basin 4 Removed Site 5 Notes: Saturated soil. Classify as wetland (Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm). Cypress in canopy, Blechnum in understory. T -FJ . _ - _L_ Photo Date: 10/1 /21 dAVE NW Basin 4 Removed Site 5 VE NW I 18th AV Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 9 161h AVENViI� o INSET 14th AVE NW J m 12th AVE NW o 10th AVE NW 3:1 3: �> 3: w z z z z z In M rn 6 � N V Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map 1 Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 5-2 Notes: Saturated soil. Classify as wetland. Cypress stands in low Cypress -Pine area. Understory of Brazilian Pepper, Myrsine, and Sabal Palm. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 10 Immokalee RD 224NWnPond 18161 o JNSET 14th AVE NW m 12th AVE NW o 10th AVE NW �I w Z z z Z Z U) U) U U) '6 In M rn N N Study Boundary Map Data Point 11 �: Pq - ti� INSET - Data Collection Map IN Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 5-3 Notes: Standing water and Cypress throughout parcel. Wetland. Parcel flagging onsite. Check to see if development planned for property. I_A--7 mokalee�RD Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Pond Site 5-3 d AVE NW 20th A W Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 12 18th AVE N L. 161h AVE NV1l 0 14thAVENW J m 12th AVE NW a 10thAVENW 3:1 3: �> � w z z z z z In M rn 6 � N N Study Boundary Map Data Point 13 INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 5-3 Notes: Standing water and Cypress throughout parcel. Wetland. Parcel flagging onsite. Check to see if development planned for , pro p e rty. — Photo Date: 10/1 /21 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW 18th AVE N W 2INSE T Pond Site 5-3 0 NW J m 12th AVE NW o z Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 14 3:1 3: �> � w z z z z z Cn Cn C/) In M rn 6 I N N Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jlacob& _ C.oao�4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. Immokalee RD WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 5-3 Notes: Standing water in roadside swale. Hydric soil. Parcel flagging onsite. Check to see if development planned for property. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Pon Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 15 Immokalee RD CZL 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW 18th AVE d Site 5-3 W z INSET 14th AVE NW J m 12th AVE NW o M 10th AVE NW �I 3: w z z z z z U) U) U) LZI � M C N N Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jlacob& _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 5-4 Notes: Standing water throughout wetland. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 n 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE SET 18th Pond Site 5-412thA4th A) 0 10thAVENW Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 16 z z z z U) U) = = "0 N it� N I Study Boundary Map Legend 110 :-i. 0 Data Collection Point Roads 22 rid A�YE� N W I FLUCCS Boundary 4 QPond Sites Evaluated k x, t 81�4 624 Z 4 J R Data Point 16 m 4`1-1. 110 • . 411- ----� N 0 Feet INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 5-4 - Utilities Notes: Utility pedestals observed include: Underground Cable - United Telephone System, CenturyLink, and one with an unidentified tag. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Pond Legend Roads Canals F- Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 19 P901miJl Immokalee RD n 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW 18th AV INSET Site 5-4 NW z 0 O 14th AVE NW J m 12thAVENW o 10th AVE NW �I w z z z z z U) U) U) "- I to M rn 6 C N N Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 5-4 Notes: Standing water throughout wetland. Data Point 17: Standing water. Data Point 18: Non-hydric soil. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Po Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 17 1—� - :t Immokalee RD nd 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW 18th AVE N INSET Site 5-4 - Z 0 o 14th AVE NW J m 12th AVE NW o M 10th AVE NW �I w z z z z z co U) LzI = I` M N N Study Boundary Map Data Point 18 INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 6-3 Notes: No standing water but hydric indicators. Classify as wetland. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 20 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE N Pond Site 6-3 INSET 161h AVE-N1111 Z 0 O 14thAVENW 00 12th AVE NW o 10thAVENW z z z z U) � = = "0 N it� M N I Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 6-3 Notes: No hydrology. Contains Cypress and Cabbage Palm but not a wetland. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 M. Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 21 Immokal - RD 22nd AVE NW [INSET Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 6-3 Notes: No hydrology. Contains Cypress and Cabbage Palm but not a wetland. Urena, Bracken Fern, Callicarpa. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 M. Legend Roads - Canals F- Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 22 w'!J ImMo_kalee RD 22nd AVE NW INSET Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 6-3 Notes: No hydrology. Contains Cypress and Cabbage Palm but not a wetland. Indicators area was burned. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads - Canals F- Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 23 22nd AVE NW Pond Site 6-3 0 W INSET h AVE-NW z F1214th AVENW JthAVENW o 10th AVE NW 3:1 3: 3: 3: z z z z L I In M N w z U) Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 6-1 Notes: Wetland, likely low UMAM scoring. Cypress - Pine Cabbage Palm with Brazilian Pepper invasion. Photo Date: 10/1/21 U-1mmynQc Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 24 k� 22nd AVE NW%INSET Pond Site 6-1 M SA 18th AVE NW 161h AVE NW _Z 0 14th AVE NW J O ao 12thAVENW o 10th AVE NW 3:1 3: �> � w Z z z Z Z In M rn 6 N N Study Boundary Map 111 INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jlaco & _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 6-1 Notes: Algal mat but no other hydrologic indicators present. Classify as wetland, but expect UMAM hydrology will score low. i aJmnkalee R Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Pointr25 22nd AVE NW% INSET Pond Site 6-1 18thAVENW 161h AVE-NW _z o Q 14th AVE NW J ao 12thAVENW o 10th AVE NW 3:1 3: �> � w z z z z z In M rn 6 � N V Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacob& _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING STUDY Pond Site 6-1 Notes: Evidence of disturbed hydrology. Photo Date: 10/1 /21 Legend Roads Canals Field Sites Inspected 0 Project Study Limits C Pond Sites Evaluated Photos Data Point 26 4, i +F .. L} • 4 ' r � f 1 22nd AVE NW INSET Pond Site 6-1 18th AVE NW nJ 161h AVE-NW _z o Q 14th AVE NW J m 12thAVENW o 10th AVE NW 3:1 3: �> � w z z z z z Cn Cn Cn In M rn 6 C N N Study Boundary Map INSET - Data Collection Map Note: Preliminary Wetland Determination; Detailed wetland delineation and evaluation to be performed piror Jacobs. _ C.oao4v to permitting. Source: Collier County 2021 aerials. x� T ,� T �, s i 110 ' , 450 L �190� h ti �� r � � �.;•3� _ � �� � 450 -� 5# A i _ 110 —,brr 450 -- 0 .t i �+ r r 140nVT Nile % C. r" T '� Lr � �� � _ • �� � �� C D � { Q . ,� �, �•110450 w - � � rUl'AlR7►!I�l � �9L'�J IN � • 16 t -.NIIINN - 140 { y k _ ^r 1FrET4r '- I. _ r ` 0 _ .. % _MEOW. , �'— flip 4. 'I _ :.. % Jim C NY Legend \ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study lrLtiit Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary Preliminary FLUCCS Map 0 175 350 Page 1 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters = Feet December2021 —MJJdW26 w . IL M. - qv,�Q 814 -- � • r IpL16 � r ¢�i4 TT+I _ � * � • - � � 1r1ti r ` � 'r�fr+ �� LM I ti110' .f • .4- , �F .' _ - - � 450 w � � - { ' � ' _� ' �: � •� 450 50 ' 1• 450 �, 450 r� y _ �.i'yi• 5�� .8�0 'i'`�ti�"• i 3i'' r f`_� I%' . k �off :. rz • •_.�r�-iC�iJ+ r�o- 7fZ' _*R�I_�i� :'. —�• ti ,� l•,� �� .� 3 1r 7C i dpT 1r* I: �La+ r • - _ il..+: ■, T . *jf• �'• "•,Jw �� Y u. a ti 814 f L r. • � 450 11.0 Y' 450 . 140 � •{ • �• {r 110. ,. � � � • 28 _ _ 1 r r u}41 f Or YI-is 7 �, ti� �r +tea FF r f �r '•� • r ':.•t � r fir. ti �J4• }'K`�i�' ���ti .,� ��� y`r - y r 1 -+ r •• JI f r f S . Legend \ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study M M TY Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary Preliminary FLUCCS Map 0 175 350 Page 2 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters = Feet December2021 814 ip III J -ICJ' SG.C.]�er � • • � J �+�'�� • ll MaA '' 110 0 11-0` r { ram' - _ _ — 71, • 1 , 7 ! 110 110 • � 4504 ,411 450 �ti - '� - '�� - -jar — r� 110 �' :by • • � : � r T •t r•' s - • _ t ■ ham•. r. 61 4 _' ��llA k .r f 00 40F y t i 1 • r F + rT 7 1k •. k - Legend \ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study AMMTY Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary Preliminary FLUCCS Map 0 175 350 Page 3 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters = Feet December2021 1St�,ST Sir." r �.� � � - "yf';,� �� T �'� �•'• 4 V yrY' � '• �"' z } - r > nd Si to 3-2 Qrjy� k p J 1 •1 3 Tyr• - 1 � .'3r ti 4 x r - 16 • 1 � 7- L — 7-1 _--. - Wilson BLUD N • .• -• -lap,_ r - s' �; , Basin 3 Removed F 'i Site, r . - W W ... _ 74 -, r , Pond Site 2-2 ' w i + 4 -, •.: ; -[ 4 f_ % ` Pond Site 2-3J IT 4 Pond Site 3 a" fir" r. i 417 OR i J t 110 • - 1{10 621 450 110 1 . 4A d Pr 10 - 4.1�1 +110 y J 1'10}'. 450 r y - 4 ,4 �• r� t, 1 2 }.. 4111A ' v +�� ep_�r "�ti"ti'•�•�� ti.na- - - - ' ' J!?�!�}�y� �,��- .'-'�' �'�= � "fir aa,y �. }�"��, �`�,� .� Joir 110 -. _ .11''!0 110'' 110'} 110 110 �1110�� *a ;. 624 • � � � •: �• : , � t � #41 �1 1 U T �• r e. W.r1 �r a r w ,� k �' Note: Properties within pond site underdevelopment.' , _ r - Legend \ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Can MT 7 Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary 0 175 350 Preliminary FLUCCS Map Page 5 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters M = Feet December2021 ± Jill. #V a * 1i } y lop ` IV 5 — f +a � `ate ■� -� I �L' - �� wa, ti : rtrtrt��� 1 rye �i •�•'��' � ` _ � �5� f .1 Awb h � .J L y ti r % n s f 814� q1 � •r - S 624 _ 450 I I 1110 110, 110 411 n, 110 450 110 AD ` • • ' r.tF Ink. -i w 624, r—p 1-5:9 `G-'fFF1Hi�}' " 3 y 190 F _ Ft i — _ . Legend Project Boundary Parcel Boundary 250-ft Buffer Pond Sites Evaluated ti Wetlands Other Surface Waters J fir% , •ti 3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study z� FLUCCS Boundary Preli min ary FL UC CS Map 0 175 350 Page 7 of 12 Feet December 2021 k .•� '1- I� 166 1 . - -ti rN NN -41 y' NN Y ti 1 r IIIII-P AIL ply Mrr f +� �' ► 190 {r 4-M 814_ n 624 �.Y . 's 110 F-b I v' i N. �" I� } {�' y -AiAw • +, i _ ice[ %. y'--1y� NNNN pf ''k _ -, L NIP MI - t ti -cut �I 4XI 6- it IIN y1,010 � r 624 � •�••� ��- Po nd Si _ 6-1 411 z - �- y � - � �• _ � , w t � I C. •ter=.IN{ t•INMLi%rM -+7- ei v _.pw Lp . 190rF ' r_ w %- - 9. 'PAWAIL Or x F ` 624 } � 624 411 kp r ti a.56 r NN r _ i Legend Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study +CAMMTY Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary \ 0 175 Preliminary FLUCCS Map 350 Page 8 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters = Feet December2021 8 4� �0 � • � 450 ... �r � � 624 4 Rai r lop F. 1 �_ 411 814 -� tiY�,t �• �' •�� ��Yy �1 r f 4 r r ti r :or Ap 814 � �. ••�� err �_i '} ,* .1.p :��: _-.-.�- r... --�* .•s 411 i Y }� 1 ti 1 S � � •� � � � l�ii9���" ..tea. t ��� �' • � •'k5'' �'�'. y�•�}_r� F � — qr INC JV 1 f + ` r _ MR • - " .,�- �• �_.$'4mt { : _ Tom, . �. . •fix-. �_ .f } �. � • '� it � 1' "� � :� ; � •S.�.L � ��-��• � '� _ _ ,1 } ,. CORKSCREW CANAL , r F 1 Q 'f•�' f 1 Y— •* • f ' 4 Legend Project Boundary Parcel Boundary 250-ft Buffer Pond Sites Evaluated Wetlands Other Surface Waters Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study z� FLUCCS Boundary Preli min ary FL UC CS Map 0 175 350 Page 9 of 12 Feet December 2021 AM t {¢d-r `7�6a'LC.. _ ,I t -5l :.�•' .E�• '� _ NIP ii r r .a�� } - �,#,[ ' �� r, #Note: Properties within pond site underdevelopment. MW � f1 .ar ,firms i-, 7 { y y f Rik Ck d ` ' 72 Lis t R 0.1 } :t Ir } �- r;- � rA �1 512 CORKSCREW CANAL S 16 AL Mat Legend Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study CAMMTY Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer \ Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary Preliminary FLUCCS Map 0 175 350 Page 10 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters == Feet December2021 624 -• . ;J4T� f r� q.t, ti r i F �• � � � - ,ram � � � �� F � �y yy 1 } ' � • ift!'ry- . y . •.' :3 N ` ' _ filM ` k ter' - Fi �'� ' - - - _ , �tirr- 4w, .L- •4 ' 1k4 a ' 814 _''• AL, � W. .� .� � � � a* o Ap � I V 4r ••''J� - 814 •� �{• � +�': ;� •;��� - �+-'� .ice � L �# f 1 • 03 �r - 3 -* i } ?.�•� 1 { �:. .ice �� - _- 4- 7 4L IF IL 1 y17- � Jn AM ' k �• •7 ••# • ._k'.:. . h -.�.'� �� _ •F+ ' .. . + ••F ��-' r -� t t�ti.� '.#. MIMEF fir• •!* ii ip In. IL sdL CORKSCREW CANAL fy e r + ��{ � �•L 7 Clipf ram, ! h � �t� �4UP _} �� LPN # IMLM 1 c s. Legend \ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Co CAMMTY Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary Preliminary 0 175 350 FLUCCS Map Page 11 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters == Feet December2021 - M" 190 450Wc A. •, +-+��-yigr _y 'r 5{ 1 ! � Y_ - •a-� T _�• 1 � � } 'IF'"_r W-r 14 1 �+ it :x v; I• Y ti k� � i _fit : f-1% �.t. � — I ��{x x rT �: + I 9 F • _ ; r �} t ¢, �i _ Id - r "-r:• % Jt•' V a ti -�-*p y r '1k1 �} `Ir r 1� • f.• #i , , _ _ � ,��" � - r�5 r i ' . � •�' � '� � � • �'t it � _ ,4�'ti •' . � r1p Iw • ' } #r s '•'•4 �x 16 t Jr _ �. _. "� Jp rf , rrc T t�#G 0!_ r97R w i f.�. y'- �3a -ice• , _ {, IN i r.. 4 ti r Lk %L Coll 40 wry - • f+ .. r •Yr % -- Sri A-:. rp F rp yLL� .� '� _ �• ti,� •. 9. rl y 1� 5� 2 CORKSCREW CANAL �� if• rti �Y Ir pp -wp 34 ' r s _. Legend \ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Co M M TY Project Boundary 250-ft Buffer Wetlands FLUCCS Boundary 0 Preliminary FLUCCS Map 175 350 Page 12 of 12 Parcel Boundary Pond Sites Evaluated Other Surface Waters == Feet December2021 712712021 IPaC: Explore Location resources IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Collier County, Florida EdplFx I [,av Club I Go nLa boy Club L0 NQ{*• GaUGaLIvr M — ---- F__.- of O He F "kZ GnkClub Local office South Florida Ecological Services Field Office t. (772) 562-3909 IJJ (772) 562-4288 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 http://fws.gov/verobeach https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 1/13 712712021 IPaC: Explore Location resources Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and NA project-specific information is often required. 4 1 Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following: 1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. 2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. 3. Log in (if directed to do so).V 4. Provide a name and description for your project. 5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ). 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: Mammals NAME STATUS https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 2/13 7/27/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus Endangered Wherever found There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8630 Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi Endangered Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1763 Puma (=mountain Lion) Puma (=Felis) concolor (all subsp. except SAT coryi) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049 I'll Birds -00 0 NAME STATUS Audubon's Crested Caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8250 k Everglade Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbs Endangered Wherever found There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7713 Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Wood Stork Mycteria americans No critical habitat has been designated for this species https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477 Reptiles NAME American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 Endangered Threatened STATUS SAT https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 3/13 7/27/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corgis couperi Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646 Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110 Fishes NAME Gulf Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus (=oxyrhynchus) desotoi Wherever found There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/651 Insects Threatened Threatened STATUS Threatened NAME Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis bartrami Wherever found There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4837 Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyte floridalis Wherever found There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6652 Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclargus (=Hemiargus) thomasi bethunebakeri Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3797 Flowering Plants NAME Florida Prairie -clover Dalea carthagenensis floridanE Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2300 STATUS Endangered Endangered Endangered STATUS Endangered https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 4/13 7/27/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources Garber's Spurge Chamaesyce garberi Threatened Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8229 Critical habitats Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION. Migratory birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. , 0\ 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 5/13 712712021 IPaC: Explore Location resources For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA _............................................................................. BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED ............................................................................................................ FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE _..................................................................................................... BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR _.................................................................................... PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN _............................................................................................................. THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, .......................................................................................... WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL .................................................................................. ESTIMATE OFTHE DATES INSIDE WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES ............................................................................................................. THATTHE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY ............................................................................................................ BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.) ........................................................................................................ American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587 Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31 This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Common Ground -dove Columbina passerine exigua Breeds Feb 1 to Dec 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Least Tern Sterna antillarum Breeds Apr 20 to Sep 10 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Limpkin Aramus guarauna Breeds Jan 15 to Aug 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 6/13 712712021 IPaC: Explore Location resources Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Short -tailed Hawk Buteo brachyurus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8742 Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8938 Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia gundlachi This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Probability of Presence Summary Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Breeds Mar 1 to Jun 30 Breeds Mar 10 to Jun 30 Breeds May 20 to Aug 10 Ak The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence( ) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 7/13 712712021 IPaC: Explore Location resources To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (1) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. No Data (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe XAW Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC American Kestrel Too' o"n ++00 J"' 11 I I III - I ++'--I + 1 1�� BCC BCR (This is a 4-- — — -- Bird of .................. Conservation ................................. . Concern (BCC) only ...................................................... in particular Bird ............................................. Conservation ..................................... Regions (BCRs) in ............................................... the continental USA) '0,00 Non-BEagle CC C I I gill"""""""""' ++++ ++++ 0+0+ ++++ ++++ . ........................ Vulnerable (This is .................................................. not a Bird of ................................... f Conservation ........................... Concern (BCC) in ............................................... this area, but ..................................... warrants attention .................................................... because of the ......................................... Eagle Act or for ........................................... potential ......................... susceptibilities in offshore areas ......................................... from certain types .................................................. of development or .................................................... activities.) ............................ https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 8/13 7/27/2021 lPaC: Explore Location resources doveCommon Ground- 0000 1111 loll 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 +1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BCC - BCR (This is a ------------------------------------------------------ Bird of .................. Conservation .................................... Concern (BCC) only ...................................................... in particular Bird ............................................... Conservation ..................................... Regions (BCRs) in ............................................... the continental .......................................... USA) Least Tern ++++ ++++ ++++ *11 Jill Jill Jill L111 jI++ ++++ ++++ +++-I-- BCC - BCR (This is a ...................................................... Bird of .................. Conservation .................................... Concern (BCC) only ...................................................... in particular Bird .............................................. Conservation 44 .................................... Regions (BCRs) in ............................................... the continental 1�0\ ......................................... USA) Limpkin + BCC Rangewide Jill+++ 0+++ +,ill Jill Iiij ............................................ (CON) (This is a ......................................... Bird of ................... Conservation .................................... Concern (BCC) ........................................ throughout its ....................................... range in the ................................. continental USA ............................................. and Alaska.) .................................. Prairie Warbler +1+1 *+++ *00 +++ ++*+ *+++$++++$+4- BCC Rangewide �"' ............................................ C 0 N ) (This i s a ......................................... Bird of Conservation .................................... Concern (BCC) ...................................... throughout its ....................................... range in the ................................. continental USA ............................................ and Alaska.) .................................. Red-headed ++++ ++++ ++++ qlll Jill IF +++-4.. Woodpecker Mai BCC Rangewide ........................................... (CON) (This is a ......................................... Bird of ................... Conservation .................................... Concern (BCC) ...................................... throughout its ....................................... range in the ................................. continental USA ............................................. and Alaska.) https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 9/13 7/27/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources Short -tailed Hawk BCC - BCR (This is a ...................................................... Bird of ................... Conservation ..................................... Concern (BCC) only ...................................................... in particular Bird ............................................... Conservation ..................................... Regions (BCRs) in ............................................... the continental .......................................... USA) Swallow-tailed Kite BCC Rangewide ............................................ (CON) (This is a ..................................... Bird of ................... Conservation ..................................... Concern (BCC) ....................................... throughout its ....................................... range in the .................................. continental USA ............................................. and Alaska.) .................................. Yellow Warbler BCC - BCR (This is a ...................................................... Bird of ................... Conservation ..................................... Concern (BCC) only ...................................................... in particular Bird ............................................... Conservation .................................... Regions (BCRs) in ..... ........................................... the continental ......................................... USA) ++++ ++++ J I I I III 1 1 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ri 111i 11+1 lilt ++++ ++++ ++++ -4- ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ M11111111 pill k+*+ +++ L%-L-L N+9++NONE 0 :+ \ Ap'; \OOP Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 10/13 7/27/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 11/13 7/27/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. Facilities \ON Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries 0. Nk REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME 0\ 14 too, Wk C J Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. This location overlaps the following wetlands: FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND PEM1Ad P E M 1 / F04Ad PEM1Cd FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND PF02/4C PF02C PF04Ad https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 12/13 7/27/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources PFO4A PSS2/4Cd PSS4/2Cd PSS4Ad PFO2Cd PF04/EM 1 Ad PSS3/4Ad PFO1Cd PFO1/3C PFO4Cd RIVERINE R2UBHx RSUBFx A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. Data precautions Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/ZQQGNWP7TNGE7N463YS5GA4Y71/resources 13/13 7/27/2021 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix 1018 Thomasville Road Suite 200-C Tallahassee, FL 32303 850-224-8207 850-681-9364fax www.fnai.org FL RIDA MXWrA.1 An - INVENTORY Florida Natural Areas Inventory Biodiversity Matrix Query Results UNOFFICIAL REPORT Created 7/27/2021 (Contact the FNAI Data Services Coordinator at 850.224.8207 or kbrinegar@fnai.fsu.edu for information on an official Standard Data Report) NOTE: The Biodiversity Matrix includes only rare species and natural communities tracked by FNAI. Report for 10 Matrix Units: 42768, 42769, 42770, 42771, 42772, 43141, 43142, 43143, 43144, 43145 4 � o p ass Cvrrol z 0 a Matrix Unit ID: 42768 0 Documented Elements Found 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 5 Likely Elements Found Descriptions DOCUMENTED - There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix Unit. DOCUMENTED -HISTORIC - There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix Unit; however the occurrence has not been observed/reported within the last twenty years. LIKELY - The species or community is known to occur in this vicinity, and is considered likely within this Matrix Unit because: 1. documented occurrence overlaps this and adjacent Matrix Units, but the documentation isn't precise enough to indicate which of those Units the species or community is actually located in; or 2. there is a documented occurrence in the vicinity and there is suitable habitat for that species or community within this Matrix Unit. POTENTIAL - This Matrix Unit lies within the known or predicted range of the species or community based on expert knowledge and environmental variables such as climate, soils, topography, and landcover. Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Picoides borealis G3 S2 LE FE Red -cockaded Woodpecker Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear https://data.Iabins. org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/Grid Search. cfm?se l_id=43141,43142,43143,43144,43145,42768,42769,42770,42771,42772&extent=... 1 /5 712712021 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Matrix Unit ID: 42769 0 Documented Elements Found 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear Matrix Unit ID: 42770 1 Documented Element Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Puma concolor cory_i Florida Panther G5T1 S1 LE FE 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear Matrix Unit ID: 42771 1 Documented Element Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Puma concolor cory_i Florida Panther G5T1 S1 LE FE 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear https://data.Iabins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/Grid Search. cfm?se l_id=43141,43142,43143,43144,43145,42768,42769,42770,42771,42772&extent=... 2/5 712712021 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Matrix Unit ID: 42772 1 Documented Element Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Puma concolor cory_i Florida Panther G5T1 S1 LE FE 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear Matrix Unit ID: 43141 0 Documented Elements Found 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear Matrix Unit ID: 43142 0 Documented Elements Found 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear Matrix Unit ID: 43143 1 Documented Element Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State https://data.Iabins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/Grid Search. cfm?se l_id=43141,43142,43143,43144,43145,42768,42769,42770,42771,42772&extent=... 3/5 7/27/2021 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Rank Rank Status Listing Puma concolor cory_i G5T1 S1 LE FE Florida Panther 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear Matrix Unit ID: 43144 1 Documented Element Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Puma concolor cory_i Florida Panther G5T1 S1 LE FE 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear Matrix Unit ID: 43145 1 Documented Element Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Puma concolor cory_i Florida Panther G5T1 S1 LE FE 0 Documented -Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N Mycteria americana G4 S2 LT FT Wood Stork Sciurus niger avicennia G5T2 S2 N ST Mangrove Fox Squirrel Ursus americanus floridanus G5T2 S2 N N Florida Black Bear https://data.Iabins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/Grid Search. cfm?se l_id=43141,43142,43143,43144,43145,42768,42769,42770,42771,42772&extent=... 4/5 712712021 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Matrix Unit IDs: 42768 , 42769 , 42770 , 42771 , 42772 , 43141 , 43142 , 43143 , 43144 , 43145 17 Potential Elements Common to Any of the 10 Matrix Units Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State Rank Rank Status Listing Andropogon arctatus G3 S3 N T Pine -woods Bluestem Athene cunicularia floridana G4T3 S3 N SSC Florida Burrowing Owl Drymarchon coupe ri G3 S3 LT FT Eastern Indigo Snake Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia G4T2 S2 N N Narrow -leaved Carolina Scalystem Encyclia cochleata var. triandra G4G5T2 S2 N E Clamshell Orchid Eumops floridanus G1 S1 LE FE Florida bonneted bat Gopherus poly_phemus G3 S3 C ST Gopher Tortoise Lechea cernua G3 S3 N T Nodding Pinweed Linum carteri var. smallii G2T2 S2 N E Small's Flax Mustela frenata peninsulae G5T3 S3 N N Florida Long-tailed Weasel Nemastylis floridana G2 S2 N E Celestial Lily Picoides borealis G3 S2 LE FE Red -cockaded Woodpecker Polyrrhiza lindenii G2G4 S2 N E Ghost Orchid Pteroglossaspis ecristata G2G3 S2 N T Giant Orchid Puma concolor cory_i G5T1 S1 LE FE Florida Panther Rostrhamus sociabilis G4G5 S2 LE N Snail Kite Roystonea elata G2G3 S2 N E Florida Royal Palm Disclaimer The data maintained by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory represent the single most comprehensive source of information available on the locations of rare species and other significant ecological resources statewide. However, the data are not always based on comprehensive or site -specific field surveys. Therefore, this information should not be regarded as a final statement on the biological resources of the site being considered, nor should it be substituted for on -site surveys. FNAI shall not be held liable for the accuracy and completeness of these data, or opinions or conclusions drawn from these data. FNAI is not inviting reliance on these data. Inventory data are designed for the purposes of conservation planning and scientific research and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Unofficial Report These results are considered unofficial. FNAI offers a Standard Data Request option for those needing certifiable data. https:Hdata.Iabins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/Grid Search. cfm?se l_id=43141,43142,43143,43144,43145,42768,42769,42770,42771,42772&extent=... 5/5 Appendix D Utilities (Sunshine One Call Ticket) 8/16/2021 FL811 I Ticket Ticket : 228103929 Rev:000 Taken: 08/16/21 12:01ET State: FL Cnty: COLLIER GeoPlace: NAPLES CallerPlace: NAPLES Subdivision: Address : Street WILSON BLVD N Cross 1 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W Within 1/4 mile: Y Cross 2 : IMMOKALEE RD Locat: DESIGN REQUEST FOR BOTH SIDES OF WILSON BLVD N FROM GOLDEN GATE BLVD W TO IMMOKALEE RD Remarks : IN RESPONSE TO RECEIPT OF A DESIGN TICKET, SSOCOF PROVIDES THE ORIGINATOR OF THE DESIGN TICKET WITH A LIST OF SSOCOF MEMBERS IN THE VICINITY OF THE DESIGN PROJECT. SSOCOF DOES NOT NOTIFY SSOCOF MEMBERS OF THE RECEIPT BY SSOCOF OF A DESIGN TICKET. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER TO CONTACT SSOCOF MEMBERS TO REQUEST INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOCATION OF SSOCOF MEMBERS' UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. SUBMISSION OF A DESIGN TICKET WILL NOT SATISFY THE REQUIREMENT OF CHAPTER 556, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO NOTIFY SSOCOF OF AN INTENT TO EXCAVATE OR DEMOLISH. THAT INTENT MUST BE MADE KNOWN SPECIFICALLY TO SSOCOF IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY LAW. IN AN EFFORT TO SAVE TIME ON FUTURE CALLS, SAVE YOUR DESIGN TICKET NUMBER IF YOU INTEND TO BEGIN EXCAVATION WITHIN 90 DAYS OF YOUR DESIGN REQUEST. THE DESIGN TICKET CAN BE REFERENCED, AND THE INFORMATION ON IT CAN BE USED TO SAVE TIME WHEN YOU CALL IN THE EXCAVATION REQUEST. *** LOOKUP BY BETWEEN *** Grids 2613A8136C 2614A8136C 2614B8136C 2614C8136C 2614D8136C Grids 2615A8136C 2615B8136C 2615C8136C 2615D8136C 2616B8136C Grids 2616C8136C 2616D8136C Work date: 08/16/21 Time: 11:57ET Hrs notc: 000 Category: 6 Duration: UNKNOWN Due Date : 08/18/21 Time: 23:59ET Exp Date : 09/15/21 Time: 23:59ET Work type: DESIGN Boring: N White -lined: N Ug/Oh/Both: U Machinery: N Depth: UNK Permits: N N/A Done for : DESIGN Company JOHNSON ENGINEERING Type: CONT Co addr 2122 JOHNSON ST City FORT MYERS State: FL Zip: 33902 Caller JENNIFER CHROVIAN Phone: 239-334-0046 Ext: 2463 Contact JOSH HILDEBRAND Phone: 239-334-0046 BestTime: 8AM TO 5PM Mobile 239-745-8601 Fax 239-334-3661 Email JLC@JOHNSONENG.COM Submitted: 08/16/21 12:01ET Oper: JEN Chan: WEB Mbrs : CC1255 CC1650 CC2156 CNTL01 CON762 CPW592 CTV413 FPLCLR OTC811 PGSSW https://exactix.sunshine8l l .com/tickets/view/2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l675e46fde(print:print/ticketTextl2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l675e46fde)#ta... 1 /2 8/16/2021 FL811 I Ticket * Responses are current as of 08/16/2021 12:01 PM Ex. Circum Service Area UtilityType(s) Contact Alt. Contact Emergency Contact Positive Response No COLLIER COUNTY ELECTRIC, FIBER PAM WILSON HARIS DOMOND HARIS DOMOND TRAFFIC (239)252-8260 (239)252-5000 (239)252-5000 OPERATIONS SECTION CC1255 No COLLIER COUNTY FIBER JOE OLIVER HARIS DOMOND HARIS DOMOND INFORMATION (239) 252-6205 (239) 252-5000 (239) 252-5000 TECHNOLOGY (IT) CC1650 No COLLIER COUNTY IRRIGATION PAMELA LULICH DIANE LYNCH BCC ROAD (239) 252-8924 (239) 252-8924 MAINTENANCE x5820 CC2156 No CENTURYLINK FIBER, TELEPHONE BILL MCCLOUD THOMAS STURMER TAC CENTER CNTL01 (850) 599-1444 (720) 578-8090 (800) 778-9140 No CITY OF NAPLES- WATER ALICIA ACEVEDO ALICIA ACEVEDO WATER PLANT WATER (239) 213-4712 (239) 213-4712 (AFTER 4:30PM) CON762 (239) 213-4745 No COLLIER COUNTY SEWER, WATER ERIC FEY COLLIER COUNTY AFTER 5:00 PM / STAKE & LOCATES (239) 252-1037 STAKES & LOCATES ON -CALL LOCATOR CPW592 (239) 252-5924 (239) 825-1444 No COMCAST CATV JOSH DAVIS HFC HELP DESK CTV413 (239)253-7642 (855)962-8525 No FLORIDA POWER & ELECTRIC JOEL BRAY USIC DISPATCH LIGHT --COLLIER (386) 586-6403 CENTER FPLCLR (800)778-9140 No SUMMIT FIBER, TELEPHONE MICHELLE DANIEL DENISE SMITH NETWORK BROADBAND (407) 996-1183 (407) 258-3237 OPERATION CENTER OTC811 No TECO PEOPLES GAS GAS - FT MYERS P (407) 996-1188 JOAN DOMNING SHARON BECK TECO PEOPLES GAS (813) 275-3783 (813) 853-9337 CUSTOMER SERVICE** (877) 832-6747 https:Hexactix.sunshine8l l .com/tickets/view/2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l 675e46fde(print: printlticketTexV2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l 675e46fde)#ta... 2/2 Appendix E Pond Siting Report .;acobs Subject Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis Project Name Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study Attention Lorraine Lantz, AICP From Angela Shepard, P.E. Date December 7, 2021 1. Introduction Memorandum 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 505 Naples, FL 34108 United States T +1.239.596.1715 F +1.239.596.2579 www.jacobs.com Collier County initiated the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study to evaluate future corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard North (Wilson Boulevard), from Immokalee Road (CR 846) to Golden Gate Boulevard (CR 876), from a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. This memorandum documents the preliminary pond siting evaluation of stormwater recom- mendations and options for Collier County on the type, design, and Location of the stormwater management facilities for the proposed improvements. The analysis consisted of the following: ■ Calculate the probable pervious and impervious areas associated with the project improvements ■ Calculate the preliminary treatment requirements of the proposed improvements with considerations for discharge points and whether the receiving water bodies are impaired ■ Assess soils and land use information and define potential drainage basins along the 3.22-mile-long corridor ■ Identify potential pond site Locations and sizes based on estimated water quality and water quantity requirements ■ Assess impacts for each option ALL elevations used in calculations and maps in this document are based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1998 (NAVD), unless specified otherwise. Any supporting data based on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD) was converted using the following equation: NAVD = NGVD — 1.3' 2. Design Criteria The Wilson Boulevard corridor drains to the Cypress and Corkscrew Canals within the North Golden Gate Basin, Water Basin Identification (WBID) 3278S, which is in the Big Cypress area of Collier County and within the jurisdiction of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The preliminary design of stormwater management systems for this project is regulated by the rules and criteria set forth by PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis SFWMD and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). This section outlines the requirements to meet water quality and quantity standards. The project area does not traverse or discharge to any designated Outstanding Florida Water (OFW) as defined in Chapter 62-302 of the Florida Administrative Code (FAC). All other water traversed by this proposed study area have been designated Class III waters. North Golden Gate Sub -Basin (WBID 32785) is impaired for dissolved oxygen, with total nitrogen as the causative pollutant. Although there is not a current Total Maximum Daily Load or Basin Management Action Plan established, additional protective measures must be incorporated into the project improvements to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed discharge will not cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards. Additional protective measures required by SFWMD include a site -specific pollutant loading analysis and an additional 50 percent water quality treatment volume. 2.1 Potential Permits The following permits are anticipated for this project: ■ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit (FDEP) • Section 404 Individual Permit (FDEP) • Individual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) (SFWMD) 2.2 SFWMD Attenuation/Water Quantity Criteria All basins within the study area are open basins. The SFWMD discharge rate criteria are as follows: ■ The offsite discharge rate is limited to rates not causing adverse impacts to off -site properties, and: — Historic discharge rates; or — Rates determined in previous Agency permit actions; or — Rates specified in SFWMD criteria. A design storm event of 25-year frequency over 72 -hour duration shall be used to compute the discharge rates. — Stormwater attenuation for reconstruction of the existing roadway requires the proposed ponds attenuate the difference between the 25-year/72-hour pre- versus post -discharge rate. 2.3 Collier County Attenuation/Water Quantity Criteria The study area is within basins where the maximum allowable discharge rates were approved in 2016. It is anticipated these criteria will not apply because the Wilson Boulevard Corridor project involves the proposed reconstruction of an existing roadway. The 2016 discharge rates are as follows: ■ Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cubic feet per second per acre (cfs/acre) ■ Corkscrew Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre 2.4 SFWMD ERP Treatment/Water Quality Criteria Retention, detention, or a combination of both in the overall system have the following volumetric requirements: Wet detention volume provided for the greater of the first 1 inch of runoff over the drainage area or 2.5 inches of runoff over the impervious area (excluding water bodies) PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis ■ Dry detention volume provided equal to 75 percent of referenced amounts for wet detention ■ Retention volume provided equal to 50 percent of the referenced amounts for wet detention 2.5 SFWMD Land Use and Coverage Criteria Projects having greater than 40 percent impervious area and that discharge directly to the Big Cypress area of Collier County are required to provide at least 0.5 inch of dry detention or retention pretreatment as part of the required retention/detention. Pursuant to subsection 62-555.312(3), FAC, stormwater retention and detention systems are classified as moderate sanitary hazards with respect to public and private drinking water wells. New stormwater treatment facilities are not allowed within 100 feet of a public drinking water well nor within 75 feet of a private drinking water well. However, per Collier County correspondence, a 300-foot-wide buffer to an existing public water supply well may also be required and has been applied as a constraint to this evaluation (Abbot, pers. comm. 2021). 2.6 SFWMD Wet Retention/Detention Area Dimensional Criteria (Measured at or from the Control Elevation) ■ Area: 0.5-acre minimum ■ Width: 100-foot minimum for linear areas in excess of 200 feet length; irregular -shaped areas may have narrower reaches but have to average at least 100 feet ■ Depth: minimum shallow, littoral area (portion of detention bodies shallower than 6 feet) must be the Lesser of 20 percent of the wet detention area or 2.5 percent of the total of the detention area (including side slopes) plus the basin contributing area ■ Side slopes no steeper than 1:4 (vertical: horizontal) from top of bank out to a minimum depth of 2 feet below the control elevation 2.7 Floodplain/FLoodway Involvement The Federal Emergency Management Agency flood insurance rate maps (FEMA 2005) for Collier County (Panel Numbers 12021 CO240H and 12021 C0430H) indicate the study area is located within Zones AE and Zone AH of the 100-year floodplain (base flood elevation ranges from EL 13 to EL 14 NAVD). SFWMD requires no net encroachment into the floodplain, between the average wet season water table and that encompassed by the 100-year event, which will adversely affect the existing rights of others. Because the proposed Wilson Boulevard roadway improvements are anticipated to reduce floodplain storage, the proposed stormwater pond sites and roadside swales will need to provide compensating storage to demonstrate no net decrease in floodplain storage. 2.8 Methodology to Meet Water Quantity (Attenuation) and Water Quality (Treatment) Criteria The methodology to meet water quantity and water quality criteria for the Wilson Boulevard study area is as follows: ■ Identify total pond storage requirements for each basin within the study area — Establish the preliminary treatment requirements of the proposed improvements PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis • Calculate the probable pervious and impervious areas associated with the project improvements and apply SFWMD criteria with an additional 50 percent to account for impaired receiving waterbody • Perform preliminary nutrient analysis to identify types of stormwater facilities and best management practices with sufficient nutrient removal efficiencies capable of meeting net improvement standards — Determine pre- and post -development runoff volumes from potential drainage basins along the 3.22-mile-long corridor and pond sites • Identify precipitation amount for the 25-year, 72-hour storm using the 3-Day Rainfall; 25-Year Return Period Isohyetal Maps referenced in Appendix C of the SFWMD ERP Applicant's Handbook Volume II (SFWMD 2016) • Estimate the pre -development and post -development runoff, using Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Runoff Curve Number (CN) Method sited in Soil Conservation Service Technical Release 55 Method (NRCS 1986) and SFWMD ERP Applicant's Handbook Volume II ■ Identify pond discharge points and existing tailwater conditions — Use simulated 25-year/5-day stage hydrographs for estimated normal water levels and peak stages of Cypress Canal and Corkscrew Canal — Include a positive drainage gradient above canal normal water levels for wet detention pond control elevations based on distance from discharge point ■ Identify stormwater pond sites — Review available geographic information system (GIS) data to identify vacant and undeveloped parcels outside the existing right-of-way (ROW) for potential pond sites Avoid existing public water supply wells and associated 300-foot-wide buffer per County instruction • Avoid wetland and floodplain impacts, unless other alternative sites would affect residences, businesses, or public water supply wells • Evaluate potential pond sites for impacts to physical, environmental, and hydrologic impacts to determine the preferred pond site alternative — Use maximum treatment and attenuation estimates — Estimate site -specific storage height • For dry detention/retention, review available soils and GIS data to estimate seasonal high water table (SHWT) and set pond bottom elevation for minimum vertical clearance • For wet detention, set normal water level based on tailwater constraints Set wet detention and dry retention/detention pond site berm elevations at or below minimum allowable proposed roadway profile elevations anticipated to be 2 to 3 feet above existing grade and check — Estimate required pond area (acres) • Required pond size (acres) based on storage height and required volumes • Include 15% contingency for preliminary information • Compare to identified sites parcel sizes (acres) PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis 3. Existing Drainage Patterns The existing Wilson Boulevard typical section is a two-lane undivided rural roadway. Runoff from the roadway drains to roadside ditches that ultimately discharge to the nearby canals, directly or via side streets. Approximate onsite basin divides were developed based on canal locations, drainage structures, 12-digit hydrologic unit sub -basin maps, 2-foot LIDAR' contour elevations, and the Collier County Stormwater Management Facilities GIS database. 3.1 Basins 1 and 2 (from Golden Gate Boulevard to Cypress Canal) Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Cypress Canal, is within the Curry Island Drain sub -basin and generally drains north to the Cypress Canal. Although some adjacent properties appear to include depressional or wetland areas, the roadside ditches provide continuous conveyance within the existing ROW to the Cypress Canal. According to LIDAR contours, existing Wilson Boulevard elevations range between 12 and 14 feet. 3.2 Basins 3, 4, 5, and 6 (from Cypress Canal to Immokalee Road) North of the Cypress Canal to Immokalee Road, Wilson Boulevard is located along the boundary between two sub -basins, Horsepen Slough (to Corkscrew Canal) to the east and Curry Island Drain (to Curry Canal) to the west. Wilson Boulevard is approximately 1 mile east of Curry Canal and 3/8 of a mile west of Corkscrew Canal. In this segment, Wilson Boulevard is traversed by nine side streets (10th Avenue to 24th Avenue) that extend east and west, terminating at the Curry and Corkscrew Canals, respectively. Because there are no existing side drains at the traversing side streets that would continue conveyance along Wilson Boulevard north -south, each side street crossing serves as a natural drainage divide and discharge point. For purposes of this evaluation, Wilson Boulevard from Cypress Canal to Immokalee Road was sub- divided into four basins, with divides at 14th Avenue, 18th Avenue, and 22nd Avenue. 3.2.1 Basin 3 (from Cypress Canal to 14th Avenue) The existing Wilson Boulevard profile contains primarily flat slopes in this area and has an elevation near 12 feet. 3.2.2 Basin 4 (from 14th Avenue to 18th Avenue) The existing Wilson Boulevard profile contains primarily flat slopes in this area and has elevations between 12 and 12.5 feet. 3.2.3 Basin 5 (from 18th Avenue to 22nd Avenue) The existing Wilson Boulevard profile contains primarily flat slopes in this area and has elevations between 12 and 13 feet. 3.2.4 Basin 6 (from 22nd Avenue to Immokalee Road) North of 22nd Avenue, the existing Wilson Boulevard profile elevations increase from 13 to 14 feet near 24th Avenue, and up to 15 feet at the tie-in with Immokalee Road. 1 LIDAR stands for light detection and ranging. PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis 4. Proposed Drainage Patterns The Wilson Boulevard proposed typical section consists of four 11-foot-wide lanes with 5-foot-wide bike Lanes, curb and gutter, a 6-foot-wide sidewalk on the west side of the road, a 10-foot-wide pathway on the east side of the road, a 22-foot-wide grassed median, and grassed ditches on each exterior of the road for a total 165-foot proposed ROW width. The proposed exterior ditches would maintain existing offsite drainage patterns within the ROW by maintaining the hydraulic connections to the existing side street ditches. Runoff from the proposed roadway would drain to a closed storm sewer system along the proposed curb and gutter and conveyed to the proposed pond sites for water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation. Where feasible, three or more potential pond sites were identified within each basin based on a variety of factors including site -specific estimated storage volume requirements, soils conditions, GIS contour elevations, discharge points, tailwater conditions, and physical impacts. However, sites that would impact occupied residential properties or public water supply wellheads were removed from consideration. Attachment 1 includes the proposed basin divides and potential pond site locations. 4.1 Basin 1 (from Golden Gate Boulevard to Station 66+30) Proposed pond sites for Basin 1 would outfall directly to the Cypress Canal. Two potential pond sites were identified for Basin 1 along the eastern side of Wilson Boulevard to avoid impacts to numerous water supply wells. Piped conveyance systems to and from the potential Basin 1 pond sites would be located within the Wilson Boulevard ROW because no other options (that is, public side streets) are available. 4.2 Basin 2 (from Station 66+30 to Cypress Canal) Proposed pond sites for Basin 2 would outfall directly to the Cypress Canal. Four potential pond sites were identified for Basin 2 to avoid impacts to numerous water supply wells and minimize distance to the canal. Piped conveyance systems to the potential Basin 2 pond sites would be located within the Wilson Boulevard ROW and/or easements should the location of the proposed ponds not be adjacent to Wilson Boulevard. The Pond 2 outfall pipes to the Cypress Canal may be located within the Wilson Boulevard ROW or within easements along 2nd Street NE to the Cypress Canal. 4.3 Basin 3 (from Cypress Canal to 14th Avenue) Depending on the pond site location, Basin 3 could outfall directly to either the Cypress Canal or Corkscrew Canal. Three potential pond sites were identified to avoid the future Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension facilities. Piped conveyance systems to the potential Basin 3 pond sites would be located within the Wilson Boulevard ROW, and possibly along easements within the side streets should the location of the proposed ponds not be adjacent to Wilson Boulevard. The Pond 3 outfall conveyance pipes could be Located either within proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW or within easements along 10th Avenue NE to Cypress Canal or 12th Avenue NE to Corkscrew Canal. 4.4 Basin 4 (from 14th Avenue to 18th Avenue) Proposed pond sites for Basin 4 outfall directly to the Corkscrew Canal. Two potential pond sites were identified along the Cypress Canal and side streets, away from the public water supply wells. Depending on the pond site location, piped conveyance systems to and from the potential Basin 4 pond sites would be Located within the Wilson Boulevard ROW and possibly along easements within either 16th Avenue NE to the Corkscrew Canal or Jung Boulevard E to the Corkscrew Canal. PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis 4.5 Basin 5 (from 18th Avenue to 22nd Avenue) Proposed pond sites for Basin 5 outfall directly to the Corkscrew Canal. Four potential pond sites were identified along Wilson Boulevard and side streets. Depending on the pond site location, piped convey- ance systems to the potential Basin 5 pond sites would be located within the Wilson Boulevard ROW and possibly along easements within the nearby side streets. The Pond 5 outfall pipes would be located within easements either along 18th Avenue NE to Corkscrew Canal or 20th Avenue NE to Corkscrew Canal. 4.6 Basin 6 (from 22nd Avenue to Immokalee Road) Proposed pond sites for Basin 6 outfall directly to the Corkscrew Canal. Three potential pond sites were identified along Wilson Boulevard and side streets, away from the Immokalee Road frontage. Depending on the pond site location, piped conveyance systems to the potential Basin 6 pond sites would be located within the Wilson Boulevard ROW and possibly along easements within the nearby side streets. The Pond 6 outfall pipes would be located within easements either along 22nd Avenue NE to Corkscrew Canal or 24th Avenue NE to Corkscrew Canal. 4.7 Basin Summary Table 1 lists total dry pre-treatment and wet detention pond storage requirements estimated for each basin and pond site based on probable pervious and impervious areas associated with the project improvements and resulting required water quality and water quantity volumes. Attachment 2 includes site -specific basin calculations. PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis Table 1. Basin and Pond Volume Requirements Basin From Sta To Sta Length (feet) Pond Site ID Total Basin Area (acres) Impervious Area (acres) Water Quality Required (acre-feet) Water Quality +50% (acre-feet) 0.5" Dry Pre- treatment (acre-feet) Attenuation Required (acre-feet) Total Wet Pond Volume (acre-feet) 1 37+00 66+30 2,930 1-1 16.58 5.68 1.38 2.07 0.69 3.84 5.23 1-2 15.47 1.29 1.93 0.64 4.63 5.92 2 66+30 96+10 2,980 2-1 14.48 5.37 1.21 1.81 0.60 3.20 4.41 2-2 14.38 1.20 1.80 0.60 3.13 4.33 2-3 15.05 1.25 1.88 0.63 3.20 4.45 2-4 15.29 1.27 1.91 0.64 4.11 5.38 3 96+10 129+30 3,320 3-1 16.03 6.98 1.45 2.18 0.67 3.89 5.40 3-2 15.53 1.45 2.18 0.65 3.11 4.64 3-3 16.05 1.45 2.18 0.67 3.11 4.62 4 129+30 155+80 2,650 4-1 14.24 5.98 1.24 1.87 0.59 3.23 4.50 4-2 13.31 1.24 1.87 0.55 3.70 5.01 5 155+80 182+20 2,640 5-1 15.22 5.56 1.27 1.90 0.63 4.09 5.36 5-2 13.55 1.16 1.74 0.56 4.20 5.37 5-3 15.84 1.32 1.98 0.66 5.84 7.16 5-4 15.39 1.28 1.92 0.64 5.86 7.15 6 182+20 205+00 2,280 6-1 11.22 5.11 1.06 1.60 0.47* 3.44 5.04* 6-2 10.79 1.06 1.60 0.45* 3.07 4.66* 6-3 11.95 1.06 1.60 0.50 3.38 4.48 * In Basin 6, Sites 6-1 and 6-2 do not accommodate dry pre-treatment. Corresponding total wet pond volumes reflect the volume required without dry pre-treatment. PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis 5. Potential Pond Sites Table 2a through 2f summarizes the details and considerations related to each site within Basins 1 through 6, respectively. For pond sites to remain viable in cases where Available Parcel Area is less than Estimated Pond Area with 15% Contingency, additional roadway profile adjustments may be required and are described in the Comments, Advantages and Disadvantages. Attachment 3 provides calculations for pond size estimates. Attachment 4 provides additional supporting documentation. Table 2a. Potential Pond Sites Matrix — Basin 1 Factors Pond Site 1-1 Pond Site 1-2 1. Estimated Pond Area 5.5 4.4 2. Pond Area with 15% Contingency 6.3 5.0 3. Available Parcel Area (acre), 5.8 4.9 excluding areas within 300 feet of public water supply well 4. Parcel ID 3728056003, 3728048002, 37280800006, 37280920009, 3728044000 37280760007 5. Land Use Vacant Residential, Wooded Vacant Residential, Wooded 6. Proximity to outfall 3,800 linear feet (LF) 2,500 LF 7. Proximity to farthest onsite basin 2,050 LF 3,300 LF extent 8. Accessibility Maintenance and pipes to/from Maintenance and pipes to/from Wilson Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 9. Easements Required N/A N/A 10. Soils; A/D, C/D; A/D; Estimated SHWT EL 11.0 EL 10.5 11.NWL/Dry Bot.EL EL 12.0 / EL 12.0 EL11.2/EL11.5 12. Estimated Wetlands Impacts Direct Impact: 5.8 acres N/A Secondary Impacts 13. Public Water Supply Well Proximity 300-foot-wide protection zone within 300-foot-wide protection zone or adjacent to parcel within or adjacent to parcel 14. Private Well Proximity Potential Yes, pond site adjacent to developed Yes, pond site adjacent to property developed property 15. Permit Status in Collier County N/A N/A Growth Management Division (GMD) Public Portal 16. Comments, Advantages, Farther proximity to discharge point Closer proximity to discharge Disadvantages results in higher control elevation and point allows for control larger pond footprint. May require an elevation to be lower resulting additional 0.5-foot elevation increase in smaller pond footprint to proposed profile. required Ranking 2 1 PPS1105211510SWF Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis Table 2b. Potential Pond Sites Matrix - Basin 2 Factors Pond Site 2-1 Pond Site 2-2 Pond Site 2-3 Pond Site 2-4 1. Estimated Pond Area 3.2 3.1 3.8 4.0 2. Pond Area with 15% 3.7 3.6 4.3 4.6 Contingency 3. Available Parcel Area 4.6 3.9 4.1 4.3 (ac), excluding areas within 300 feet of public water supply well 4. Parcel ID 37281280007 37281320006 37281400007 37118720106, 37118720009 5. Land Use Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Wooded Wooded Wooded Wooded 6. Proximity to outfall 675 LF 425 LF 50 LF 1,700 LF 7. Proximity to farthest 2,200 LF 3,080 LF 3,400 LF 1,800 LF onsite basin extent 8. Accessibility Maintenance and Maintenance and Maintenance from Maintenance and pipes to/from pipes to/from 2nd Street NE, outfall pipes to/from Wilson Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard directly adjacent to Wilson Boulevard to canal canal canal 9. Easements Required N/A N/A Yes; (for pipes from N/A Wilson Blvd) 10. Soils; A/D, B/D; A/D; A/D, B/D; A/D; Estimated SHWT EL 11.5 EL 11.5 EL 12.0 EL 11.5 11.NWL/Dry Bot.EL EL 10.2 / EL 12.5 EL 10.0 / EL 12.5 EL9.8/EL13.0 EL 10.8 / EL 12.5 12. Estimated Wetlands N/A N/A N/A N/A Impacts 13. Public Water Supply 300-foot-wide 300-foot-wide N/A 300-foot-wide Wells protection zone protection zone protection zone adjacent to parcel within parcel adjacent to parcel 14. Private Well Yes, pond site Yes, pond site N/A Yes, pond site Proximity Potential adjacent to adjacent to adjacent to developed property developed property developed property 15. Permit Status in N/A N/A N/A N/A Collier County GMD Public Portal 16. Comments, Single parcel, Single parcel, Single parcel adjacent Multiple parcels Advantages, adjacent to Wilson adjacent to Wilson to canal, requires pipe centrally located. Disadvantages Boulevard Boulevard, smallest easement. May May require an site required require an additional additional0.5-foot 0.5-foot increase to increase to roadway roadway profile. profile. Ranking 2 1 3 4 PPS1105211510SWF 10 Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis Table 2c. Potential Pond Sites Matrix - Basin 3 Factors Pond Site 3-1 Pond Site 3-2 Pond Site 3-3 1. Estimated Pond Area 3.5 3.0 3.5 2. Pond Area with 15% 4.0 3.4 4.0 Contingency 3. Available Parcel Area (ac), 4.5 4.3 4.8 excluding areas within 300 feet of public water supply well 4. Parcel ID 37492000005 37549720005 37492200009, 37492240001 5. Land Use Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Wooded Wooded Wooded 6. Proximity to outfall 50 LF 50 LF 700 LF 7. Proximity to farthest onsite 3,400 LF 3,200 LF 3,050 LF basin extent 8. Accessibility Maintenance and pipes Maintenance and pipes Maintenance and pipes to/from 10th Avenue NE to/from Wilson to/from 12th Avenue NE to canal Boulevard to canal 9. Easements Required Yes N/A Yes (10th Avenue) (12th Avenue) 10. Soils; A/D, B/D; B/D; B/D, C/D; Estimated SHWT EL 11.5 EL 11.0 EL 11.5 11. NWL / Dry Bot. EL EL 9.8 / EL 12.5 EL 9.8 / EL 12.0 EL 10.4 / EL 12.5 12. Estimated Wetlands Impacts N/A N/A N/A 13. Public Water Supply Wells N/A N/A N/A 14. Private Well Proximity Yes, pond site adjacent to Yes, pond site adjacent N/A Potential developed property to developed property 15. Permit Status in Collier N/A N/A N/A County GMD Public Portal 16. Comments, Advantages, Single parcel adjacent to Single parcel adjacent to Multiple parcels, central Disadvantages discharge point but discharge point location in basin farthest for conveyance to pond Ranking 2 1 3 PPS1105211510SWF 11 Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis Table 2d. Potential Pond Sites Matrix — Basin 4 Factors Pond Site 4-1 Pond Site 4-2 1. Estimated Pond Area 4.2 3.3 2. Pond Area with 15% 4.8 3.8 Contingency 3. Available Parcel Area (ac), 4.5 4.2 excluding areas within 300 feet of public water supply well 4. Parcel ID 37492560008 37493440004, 37493440101 5. Land Use Vacant Residential, Wooded Vacant Residential, Wooded 6. Proximity to outfall 700 LF 50 LF 7. Proximity to farthest onsite 2,500 LF 3,100 LF basin extent 8. Accessibility Maintenance and pipes to/from Maintenance and pipes to/from along along Jung Boulevard E and/or 16th 16th Avenue NE Avenue NE 9. Easements Required Yes (Jung Boulevard E or 16th Yes (16th Avenue NE) Avenue NE) 10. Soils; B/D; A/D; Estimated SHWT EL 12.0 EL 11.5 11.NWL/Dry Bot.EL EL 10.4 / EL 13.0 EL 10.0 / EL 12.5 12. Estimated Wetlands Impacts N/A N/A 13. Public Water Supply Wells N/A N/A 14. Private Well Proximity Yes, pond site adjacent to developed N/A Potential property 15. Permit Status in Collier County N/A N/A GMD Public Portal 16. Comments, Advantages, Both sites are generally central to Both sites are generally central to Disadvantages basin and are located along side basin and are located along side streets to canal. May require an streets to canal; site 4-2 is adjacent to additional 0.5-foot elevation canal increase to proposed roadway profile. Ranking 2 1 PPS1105211510SWF 12 Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis Table 2e. Potential Pond Sites Matrix - Basin 5 Factors Pond Site 5-1 Pond Site 5-2 Pond 5-3 Pond 5-4 1. Estimated Pond Area 5.2 2.6 (wet) 1.0 (dry) 5.8 5.4 2. Pond Area with 15% 6.0 3.0 (wet) 1.1 (dry) 6.7 6.2 Contingency 3. Available Parcel Area 4.1 5.2 (wet) 2.2 (dry) 4.9 5.0 (ac), excluding areas within 300 feet of public water supply well 4. Parcel ID 37598680002, 37740280001 (dry), 3759840004, 37740760000, 37598720001 37743480002and 37598480008 37740840001 3774228009 (wet) 5. Land Use Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Wooded Wooded Wooded Wooded 6. Proximity to outfall 2,200 LF 500 LF 2,600 LF 2,500 LF 7. Proximity to farthest 11400 LF 2,700 LF 2,050 LF 2,000 LF onsite basin extent 8. Accessibility Maintenance and pipes Maintenance and Maintenance and Maintenance and pipes to/from Wilson pipes to/from Wilson pipes to/from Wilson to/from Wilson Boulevard and 20th Boulevard and 18th Boulevard and 20th Boulevard and 20th Avenue NE Avenue NE Avenue NE Avenue NE or 22nd Avenue NE 9. Easements Required Yes Yes Yes Yes (20th Avenue NE or (20th Avenue NE) (18th Avenue NE) (20th Avenue NE) 22nd Avenue NE) 10.Soils; B/D; A/D, B/D; 12.5 (wet) A/D, B/D; A/D; Estimated SHWT 12.0 A/D; 11.5 (dry) 11.5 11.0 11.NWL/Dry Bot.EL EL 11.3 / EL 13.0 EL 10.2 / EL 12.5 EL 11.5 / EL 12.5 EL11.4/EL12.0 12. Estimated Wetlands N/A Direct Impact: 2.2 ac Direct Impact: 4.9 ac Direct Impact: 3 ac Impacts Secondary Impacts Secondary Impacts Secondary Impacts 13. Public Water Supply N/A N/A N/A N/A Wells 14. Private Well Proximity Yes, pond site adjacent Yes, pond site N/A Yes, pond site adjacent Potential to developed property adjacent to to developed property developed property 15. Permit Status in PRBD20140514836, N/A N/A PRROW200210836837, Collier County GMD (2014), house PRROW20210627487, Public Portal demolition, complete Cancelled, abandoned 16. Comments, Multiple parcels, too Split dry pre- Impacts to high Multiple parcels, too Advantages, small for pond needs. treatment and wet quality wetlands. small for pond needs. Disadvantages May be used in tandem sites are located in Multiple parcels, May be used in tandem with another site series without need centrally located, but with another site and/or and/or additional 1 to for additional pipes. additional pipe additional 1 to 2-feet 2-feet elevation Wetland impacts at required and too elevation increase for increase for proposed dry pond site small for pond proposed profile. profile. needs. May need additional 1 to 2-feet elevation increase to proposed profile. Ranking 3 1 4 2 PPS1105211510SWF 13 Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis Table 2f. Potential Pond Sites Matrix - Basin 6 Factors Pond Site 6-1 Pond Site 6-2 Pond Site 6-3 1. Estimated Pond Area 2.6 2.2 2.4 (wet) 0.9 (dry) 2. Pond Area with 15% 3.0 2.5 2.7 (wet) 1.1 (dry) Contingency 3. Available Parcel Area (ac), 4.0 3.9 2.6 (wet) 2.0 (dry) excluding areas within 300' of public water supply well 4. Parcel ID 37741440002 37743920009 37741760009 (wet), 37740880003 (dry) 5. Land Use Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Vacant Residential, Wooded Wooded Wooded 6. Proximity to outfall 1,400 LF 50 LF 1,150 LF 7. Proximity to farthest 1,400 LF 3,050 LF 2,300 LF onsite basin extent 8. Accessibility Maintenance and pipes Maintenance and pipes Maintenance and pipes to/from Wilson to/from Wilson to/from Wilson Boulevard Boulevard and 24th Boulevard and 24th and 22nd Avenue NE Avenue NE Avenue NE 9. Easements Required Yes Yes Yes (24th Avenue NE) (24th Avenue NE) (2211 Avenue NE) 10. Soils; A/D and B/D; A/D; A/D; Estimated SHWT EL 13.0 EL 13.5 EL 12.0 11.NWL/Dry Bot.EL EL10.8/N/A EL10.0/N/A EL 10.6 / EL 13.0 12. Estimated Wetlands Direct Impact: 1.5 acres N/A Direct Impact: 0.7 acres Impacts Secondary Impacts (south) Secondary Impacts 13. Public Water Supply Wells N/A N/A N/A 14. Private Well Proximity N/A Yes, pond site adjacent to Yes, pond site adjacent to Potential developed property developed property 15. Permit Status in Collier N/A N/A N/A County GMD Public Portal 16. Comments, Advantages, Single parcel, high Single parcel, high Split dry pre-treatment Disadvantages ground elevations ground elevations and wet sites are located relative to roadway; not relative to roadway; not in series without need for able to provide dry pre- able to provide dry pre- additional pipes. Wetland treatment; requires treatment; requires impacts at dry pond site tandem pond and/or tandem pond and/or overtreatment in other overtreatment in other basins basins Ranking 3 2 1 PPS1105211510SWF 14 Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis 6. Recommended Pond Site Locations Based on the considerations from Tables 2a through 2f, the following pond site locations are recommended for the Wilson Boulevard Corridor improvements. 6.1 Basin 1 Pond Site 1-2 has an estimated area of 5.0 acres and is located within Parcels 37280800006, 37280920009, and 37280760007. No wetland impacts are anticipated at this location. Piped conveyance systems to and from Pond Site 1-2 would be located within the proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW. 6.2 Basin 2 Pond Site 2-2 has an estimated area of 3.6 acres and is located within Parcel 37281320006. No wetland impacts are anticipated at this location. Piped conveyance systems to and from Pond Site 2-2 would be Located within the proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW. 6.3 Basin 3 Pond Site 3-2 has an estimated area of 3.4 acres and is located adjacent to the Cypress Canal within Parcel 37549720005. There are no anticipated wetland impacts at this location. Piped conveyance systems to Pond Site 3-2 would be located within the proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW. 6.4 Basin 4 Pond Site 4-2 has an estimated area of 3.8 acres and is located adjacent to Corkscrew Canal within Parcel 37493440004. There are no anticipated wetland impacts at this location. Piped conveyance systems to Pond Site 4-2 would be located within the proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW and along 16th Avenue NE. 6.5 Basin 5 Pond Site 5-2 has an estimated area of 4.1 acres and is located along 18th Avenue NE within Parcels 37740280001, 37743480002, and 3774228009. Although 2.2 acres of wetland impacts are anticipated, Pond Site 5-2 is the only alternative that accommodates both wet detention and dry detention pre- treatment without raising the roadway profile more than anticipated 2 to 3 feet. Piped conveyance systems to Pond Site 5-2 would be located within the proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW and along 18th Avenue NE. 6.6 Basin 6 Pond Site 6-3 has an estimated area of 3.8 acres and is located along 22nd Avenue NE within Parcels 37741760009 and 37740880003. Although 0.7 acres of wetland impacts are anticipated at the site Located on the south side of 22nd Avenue NE, Pond Site 6-3 is the only alternative that accommodates the anticipated proposed roadway profile. Piped conveyance systems to Pond Site 6-3 would be located within the proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW and along 22nd Avenue NE. 7. Design Phase Considerations Potential pond sites and size estimates in this memorandum are preliminary and require additional evaluation during the design phase including wetland delineation, geotechnical borings, and topographic survey. Although a 15% contingency has been included for pond site sizes, a pond site -re-evaluation is PPS1105211510SWF 15 Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis recommended shortly before right-of-way acquisition occurs in subsequent design phases. Additional design considerations are described but not limited to the following sections. 7.1 Basin Divides and Conveyance Limitations Preliminary onsite drainage basins were estimated based on existing drainage patterns, canal locations, and anticipated conveyance system length limitations. During the design phase, adjustments to drainage basins may be required to optimize the stormwater conveyance systems to selected pond sites. 7.2 Proposed Roadway Profile Because of a variety of factors, potential pond site storage estimates are based on anticipated project improvements to Wilson Boulevard including raising the proposed roadway elevations approximately 2 to 3 feet higher than existing elevations. During the design phase, proposed roadway profile elevations will need to be optimized to minimize required ROW, promote efficient stormwater conveyance, and ensure peak design high water stages do not encroach into travel lanes. Additional feasibility considerations during the design phase will be needed to ensure stormwater conveyance systems are accommodated in proposed dry pre-treatment systems. Because of high groundwater tables along the corridor, sump conditions may be required. 7.3 Proposed Roadside Swales The proposed typical section includes approximately 30 feet on each side between the back of sidewalk or pathway to the proposed Wilson Boulevard ROW. These exterior areas of the corridor are occupied by proposed swales to maintain existing offsite drainage patterns. During the design phase, these areas could be considered for floodplain compensation and/or dry pre-treatment, pending refinements to offsite drainage area delineation, calculated pond storage, and stormwater conveyance systems. 7.4 FLoodplain Impacts and Compensation During the design phase, the total volume of floodplain storage impacts from Wilson Boulevard proposed roadway improvements will be determined and compared to proposed floodplain compensation volumes provided within Wilson Boulevard ROW and stormwater ponds. If net floodplain storage is decreased, further floodplain analysis and evaluation of Big Cypress Basin watershed resources may be required to demonstrate the project will not adversely affect the existing rights of others. 7.5 GeotechnicaL Considerations In addition to the geotechnical information needed for pond design such as soil permeability, water table conditions and depth to any confining layer, a seepage and slope stability analysis should be considered where proposed ponds maintain water levels above existing ground. 7.6 Pond Site Parcel Availability Status As described in the Section 2.8, vacant and undeveloped parcels are considered candidates for potential pond sites. During the project's ROW acquisition phase, all pond site properties should be reviewed for pending permit applications in the Collier County GMD Public Portal. PPS1105211510SWF 16 Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis 7.7 Project Limits The Preliminary Pond Siting Analysis is based on study limits from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. During the design phase, project limits may extend north and south to provide taper areas that tie the additional lanes to existing conditions. Although additional roadway improvements are anticipated to be minor, additional stormwater accommodations may be necessary to meet water quantity and water quality requirements. 8. References Abbot, Alicia E.I., PMP, Collier County Government. 2021. Personal communication email with Recipient Bill Gramer, Jacobs Engineering Group. September. Collier County Property Appraiser. 2021. Property Summary. https://www.collierappraiser.com/ Collier County, Florida. 2021. ALLOWABLE POST -DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE FORMULAS FOR COLLIER COUNTY CANALS (Code of Ordinances. Chapter 90. ARTICLE II. DIVISION 2. Sec. 90-41). October. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2005. Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Collier County, Florida (Panel Numbers 12021 CO240H and 12021 C0430H). November. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2021. Comprehensive Verified List. June. https://fLoridadep.aov/sites/default/files/Comprehensive-Verified-List 06212021.x1sx Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2022. Drainage Design Guide. January. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs). 2019. Final Pond Siting Report, Immokalee Road (CR 846) at Randall Boulevard Intersection. May. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs). 2021. Drainage & Permitting Technical Memorandum, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension from Collier Boulevard to 16t" Street. June. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2010. Canals in South Florida: A Technical Support Document. April. https://www.sfwmd.Qov/sites/default/files/documents/canaLssfL appendixa-c.pdf South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2016. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICANT'S HANDBOOK. May 22. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2018. Map: Works of the Big Cypress Basin. April. https://www.sfwmd.Qov/sites/default/files/documents/map works of the bcb.pdf United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55. June. PPS1105211510SWF 17 Attachment 1 Proposed Basin Divides and Potential Pond Sites 1�.��6�'"1 II +•.'-'S.-F..ti� 1 -3��k;�7 n• Ir 'C.�J �Jr"� �_ t .v,..I I I� I ►°�,z�-. \`( c I \\ � JJ qi_I �1 sI� / IIII ^ 1S\ I I \J \J EL 14i I n J € 4 II I I _ Illl 'IIeLI islil 7� i7 If --- -I-_---_-_- - - sr -twdJ 1 IIII POND ?�i 1 cj \ -\ `( ,-•,, _ tinjllll /iIlllNhlll�hlNlIul';-_ <` \) D POND \EL-i� IT o goo sooPpp IIISITE SITEEL 5-1 ATE kL» %.1 _ jFeet EL fa-2 EL zEL_I II 3 nI E W7 mII. rr \ Iz t�-� BASIN 5 \(( ' L -z ------_ -----------N--6 --------- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -— — — — — EL z BASIN 3 B BASIN BASI ASIPi'I��1I16I I} - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - -r L - - = TL- q 7 - - - - - - - - --- -- - -- ---- -__--------------------------- _ E III -- - - -- - ----�--------------------------------------- ----- ZY- --- - ---- - -- -- _---------=----------- __- — ------ — ---- r-- \\I — ( EL r - - c EL 7z cE 7z E �° BASIN 2 . �, i, r - r r \ EL_aa II' r \ 1 l\ `1 \! _ - r - I % J ' E 7 17a, \ l i \ `' \ �) �_c ( � \ Ly rJ1-J1.: ) ` I _ _ l eL7a 1 f , EL 14 EL 12 Ilk 4 Eu74 to EL 7a Et 7a) / _ � __,� '� J > �, EL v a r .y r - 1 i eLv pz l �) PQk� EL 74 L r ( �� -�- II J III E( EL r V I ) lEL ] POND POND7211 172 �J A v eL7 �.; I.I IIII II , - l ELu� ��1 �1 y » ,J -� n�z ���;POf\f� 2 SITE E�7E s`.► c ��� v ,I A i y ry j - SIT SITE, L-� ) EL 7z-- _ II �a.� POND ^ POND A , v_ EL�z `Iw �w-vEL 7 j 5-2 = ti �� SITE 5 4 6 31 z 6-1 r. EL 70 J A y 2-1 �; 2-2 f y\-EL 7z 1 v� 'fr.� -- A I , {�'- +ice p - -� �� �� - r� SITE 1-7 � "� r SITE 1 2 I � �� II ra /v - - � - I � � � I� _ '` ' - � � -- POND EL z7 w� �7 l� �i7a J s -3` V� � CA s _ Aw EL 14 is \eL]z'':- 14� V �L�". . ,. �. �'�` .: _ _ — SITE 6 3 P,;.v,' ,ONRI•• <_ - S�A 1I. •I r - EL 7a; ': r - A ^ � y S I T� 3=Y"� v �L At _' r \ ,-;• �-- : � / A I A J �v � � r � � � c t � I w � � ��� �-J ,l � ) EL E �_ _- POND I I � Lei �7a II r �I'�- J �. `-,,►" �... � J. • i..�` w•- ��-��: � � _ _ A II I v T) a � _1� ti - -.y SITE II'la �F --- -wiz I'I �� �.-_ "�i r ,w A r= J,--V - i ' a fL EL9z� s' �► ^ ` �I E 7R',+- �� .� i ' t as _ EL 14� / �I v vr�EL 7e E� 7� i \ M �,'I �� - 'yam I v / y� - �- 61 , _ A_ 7 POND - F POND II r ► ��A. �� -�,. •�- __ _ r - r. a J�w. J1, V I �r �1 w �I�.., ) �'_ ►I IT7a } �I J� �� v �I. y •s i� 4 -- ;� I I� .�; > •v A ��=,1 _ !! SITE 3-3 E�-L _J t.. SITE 4-1 ' :, �; + �:;� ►• 1 \.s-' •. �I_ POND rawc►'�?f rl rr. .t 1 _ ti'9r- ��_ �� �� # 1 afi �� .►11: n } w V r y — _ s i _ a ti �a� 12 $r' • — i - - - F n 4 LEGEND - - - - - - �r _ -- _. z;1�D ST NE �F , - -- -_ --� -- - -: 1', - -- — -- � L, 2� _ m �1 �� �� L 14 :r _ BASIN ROW AREA ` -- - his�� �:. . (ROW) c t � I � � � ,+I� _� �• S • --1 = ; s yr II 1) �' 1 r�� �� 1 / \� �� �� _ a� �`v L! IF ti �. `'3► - v r- �� 'ow_ Aires. `' II ■ i - _- -i � VJ /t -_.I - DEL iz r� _ � 1 ■ r.r. ( i1r. '-. 1 r 'i _ - _, A 1 sl RECOMMENDED POND SITE �, �1 �� r - - ��` ---_ ,v v�,- a' _ _ J �R EL� AFr sY - � (� y. , . � 1 1 � EL l al � 1 L _ € J - EL ]4 ntI • ) fi�L • _ �`— POTENTIAL POND SITE s', v f_ - : J \ i \II bl 1 7 �' ll POND �oi.l�-�� r'l'-p' -� �I r '�' _ II 1 V� �/ �!�a\ . „r - _i :�' y-I _ Crs, • .1 - = c��.. SITE 6�ZL7q j l-s- POTENTIAL EASEMENT v rr, v �v I h ��� � r. - - - -v aSLTE 4-2 �E��z " .�: ��' :EL7 -- _ - v 11 �� -` A �� III I,r �� r _- rJv EL -_ �I ��5..---- - � .. � � � � � � � / � ELF 100 WIDE BUFFER TO PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WELL ��I 1 � � � - � � � EL8 �■ __ ;�,_ ,. - - v1 ( l 1 I sll --'-—�- _ ELa - _ = � -- - _-- ---—_-- ---- �' -- ;1 "s-�y- � �i►-�'�--- -� �_ -�_1 v ) _ __yrl(= - 1 =, \ �l' 1 _ _ � , � / 'rr .'s } � � k f � � � I �Cr � +1•,_ p,..�iry i' v_ V A - i- .J J I v1 /--'v 1 �). 1 v �� I�j A \; -JIi t _ _v � I i�! ,4 T � 1 �. .• 'f '+N +�'ar�I'•jai fp �-- .i � _.i ( -, A� 300'-WIDE BUFFER TO PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WELL u J A� \% ern+, i _/ i--- - _ 'V1 1 _ % . ( i �I,r-• [� .rr rs r r I I ��'�' �::� tii rr �_ r � �•-�:��`� _.'ti: - � C,�1. A �,.a^ � ry l� � I � �_ > �- % c,1- � I { . ' III. 'V/r� � -� ��r�: III •�.�r �� � '�.'_ .t+•� � \ 2' LIDAR CONTOUR _� �' v II I "I r ��..• I -r' _ 4_ - - -x � r� - -� � .�. � - =y I x. `�- -+qy-•....: .. i f' I I� �v' _ i. � •t'G •\�^-, q• a- .. .� } 'ti .a \ - GI S PROPERTY LINES �. .� \ :1r. •7;. 4- }'��� „ V , i ; �- I � -iyE �T� �r � '-J I^ � VA.V � ( ' 1R ''-'-7'�_ `� ':._ � ,s-,Z; }:. ti� +i� �'i ..' r'�. . P �,.rti' �� � . � rr i'• —__�� 1 � A v II v �+f I A � �� ,?.'7 I ,,�'• .r ��� I -.� �r ,-: •'z -�>- � I Attachment 2 Basin Calculations PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: jBasin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations I MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: jBasin 1-1 1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 Basin Location and From STATo STA Size Typical Section ROW 37+00. 66+30. Basin Length 2,930 LF 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area = 11.10 ac Paved Area+ Basin (ROW Area) _ Treated Paved Area = 5.68 ac Percent Impervious = Pond Site Area = 5.48 ac 51% Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 16.58 ac A. 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = 1.38 Ac-Ft B-1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = 1.18 Ac-Ft 1.38 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 2.07 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.69 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = 0.66 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.41 ac Water Quantity PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 3.99 195.3 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 128, Pineda fine sand, limestone C/D 79 1.33 104.9 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 3.03 75.7 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 128, Pineda fine sand, limestone C/D 70 1.01 70.6 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102 and 105 A/D and C/D 48 4.48 212.8 Pond Site Area Wetlands 100 1.00 100.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.75 171.4 TOTALS 16.58 930.7 COMPOSITE CN 56.1 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 4.06 158.5 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 128, Pineda fine sand, limestone C/D 74 1.35 100.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) A/D and C/D 57 2.16 122.0 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 3.32 332.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.68 1 556.7 TOTALS 16.58 1269.4 COMPOSITE CN 76.6 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN ) - 10 (inches) 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / ( P + 0.8*S) (inches) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P S R V(R) (in) (in) (in) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 7.81 1.10 1.52 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.06 2.67 3.69 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 2.16 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 7.81 1 4.77 6.59 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.06 7.55 10.43 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.84 Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.69 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.23 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 1-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 37+00. Basin Location and To STA 66+30. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROWArea= 11.10 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.68 ac Pond Site Area = 4.37 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 15.47 ac A. 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B-1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Basin Length 2,930 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 51% C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required Treatment Volume 1.29 Ac-Ft 1.18 Ac-Ft 1.29 Ac-Ft 1.93 Ac-Ft 0.64 Ac-Ft E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = 0.47 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.39 ac Water Quantity PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban AD 49 3.99 195.3 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 128, Pineda fine sand, limestone C D 79 1.33 104.9 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A 1) 25 3.03 75.7 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 128, Pineda fine sand, limestone C/D 70 1.01 70.6 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 4.37 109.3 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.75 171.4 TOTALS 15.47 727.2 COMPOSITE CN 47.0 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 4.06 158.5 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 128, Pineda fine sand, limestone C/D 74 1.35 100.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 2.02 78.8 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 2.35 235.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.68 556.7 TOTALS 15.47 1129.2 COMPOSITE CN 73.0 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 *S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 11.27 0.57 0.74 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.70 2.36 3.04 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 2.30 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 1 10.50 11.27 3.48 4.49 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.70 7.08 9.12 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 4.63 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.64 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.92 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: jBasin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations I MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: jBasin 2-1 1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 Basin Location and From STATo STA Size Typical Section ROW 66+30. 96+10. 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 11.29 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.37 ac Pond Site Area= 3.19 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 14.48 ac Water Quantity Basin Length 2,980 LF Paved Area+ Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 48% A. 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = 1.21 Ac-Ft B-1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = 1.12 Ac-Ft 1.21 Ac-Ft C.1 itional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.81 Ac-Ft D. 0.5 " Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 0.60 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 200/ of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.22 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.36 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 4.05 198.6 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 69 1.35 93.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 3.08 77.0 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 55 1.03 56.4 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102 and 110 A/D, B/D 40 3.19 127.6 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.78 174.3 TOTALS 14.48 727.2 COMPOSITE CN 50.2 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 4.44 173.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 61 1.48 90.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 102 and 110 A/D, B/D 50 2.09 104.3 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.11 110.5 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.37 526.3 TOTALS 14.48 1004.4 COMPOSITE CN 69.4 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN ) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / ( P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 9.91 0.75 0.90 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 1 4.41 2.06 2.49 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.59 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 9.91 3.94 4.75 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 4.41 6.59 7.95 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.20 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.60 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.41 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: jBasin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations I MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: jBasin 2-2 1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 Basin Location and From STATo STA Size Typical Section ROW 66+30. 96+10. 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 11.29 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.37 ac Pond Site Area = 3.09 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 14.38 ac Water Quantity Basin Length 2,980 LF Paved Area+ Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 48% A. 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = 1.20 Ac-Ft B-1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = 1.12 Ac-Ft 1.20 Ac-Ft C.1 itional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.80 Ac-Ft D. 0.5 " Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 0.60 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 200/ of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.20 ac F.1 2.50/ of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.36 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 4.05 198.6 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 69 1.35 93.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 3.08 77.0 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 55 1.03 56.4 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102 and 110 A/D, B/D 40 3.09 123.6 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.78 174.3 TOTALS 14.38 723.2 COMPOSITE CN 50.3 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 4.44 173.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 61 1.48 90.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 102 and 110 A/D, B/D 50 2.09 104.5 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.00 100.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.37 526.3 TOTALS 14.38 994.1 COMPOSITE CN 69.1 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN ) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / ( P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (a-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 9.88 0.75 0.90 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 4.46 2.04 2.45 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.55 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 9.88 3.95 4.73 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 4.46 6.56 7.86 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.13 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.60 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.33 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 2-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 66+30. Size Basin Lize nand To STA 96+10. STypical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 11.29 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.37 ac Pond Site Area = 3.76 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 15.05 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,980 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 48% 1.25 Ac-Ft 1.12 Ac-Ft 1.25 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1 1.88 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.63 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.19 ac F.1 2.51% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.38 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 4.05 198.6 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 69 1.35 93.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 3.08 77.0 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 55 1.03 56.4 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102 and 131 A/D and B/D 40 3.76 150.4 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.78 174.3 TOTALS 15.05 750.0 COMPOSITE CN 49.8 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 4.44 173.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 61 1.48 90.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 102 and 131 A/D and B/D 50 2.79 139.5 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 0.97 97.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.37 526.3 TOTALS 15.05 1026.1 COMPOSITE CN 68.2 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)^2 / (P + 0.8 •S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 10.06 0.72 0.91 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 4.66 1.97 2.47 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.56 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 10.06 3.88 4.87 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 4.66 6.43 8.06 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.20 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.63 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.45 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 2-4 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 66+30. Basin Location and To STA 96+10. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 11.29 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.37 ac Pond Site Area = 4.00 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 15.29 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,980 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 48% 1.27 Ac-Ft 1.12 Ac-Ft 1.27 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1 1.91 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.64 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.35 ac F.1 2.51% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.38 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 4.05 198.6 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 69 1.35 93.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 3.08 77.0 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 55 1.03 56.4 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 4.00 100.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.78 174.3 TOTALS 15.29 699.6 COMPOSITE CN 45.8 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 4.44 173.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 61 1.48 90.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 2.23 87.0 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.77 177.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.37 526.3 TOTALS 15.29 1053.6 COMPOSITE CN 68.9 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 •S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 11.85 0.51 0.65 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 4.51 2.02 2.58 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.93 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 11.85 3.31 4.21 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 4.51 6.53 8.32 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 4.11 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.64 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.38 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 3-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 96+10. Size Basin Lize nand To STA 129+30. STypical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 12.58 ac Treated Paved Area = 6.98 ac Pond Site Area = 3.45 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 16.03 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 3,320 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 56% 1.34 Ac-Ft 1.45 Ac-Ft 1.45 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1 2.18 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.67 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.24 ac F.1 2.51% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.40 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 2.41 118.0 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 110 and 131, Hallandale and Riviera fine sand B/D 69 3.61 249.3 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 1.83 45.7 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 110 and 131, Hallandale and Riviera fine sand B/D 55 2.74 150.9 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 3.45 86.3 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.98 194.2 TOTALS 16.03 844.4 COMPOSITE CN 52.7 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 2.24 87.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 61 3.36 204.7 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 2.25 87.8 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.20 120.0 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 6.98 684.3 TOTALS 16.03 1184.0 COMPOSITE CN 73.9 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 •S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 8.98 0.89 1.19 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.54 2.43 3.25 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 2.06 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 8.98 4.28 5.72 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.54 7.20 9.61 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.89 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.67 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.40 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 3-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 96+10. Size Basin Lize nand To STA 129+30. STypical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 12.58 ac Treated Paved Area = 6.98 ac Pond Site Area = 2.96 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 15.53 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 3,320 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 56% 1.29 Ac-Ft 1.45 Ac-Ft 1.45 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1 2.18 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.65 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.20 ac F.1 2.51% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.39 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 2.41 118.0 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 110 and 131, Hallandale and Riviera fine sand B/D 69 3.61 249.3 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 1.83 45.7 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 110 and 131, Hallandale and Riviera fine sand B/D 55 2.74 150.9 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 110 , Hallandale fine sand B/D 55 2.96 162.7 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.98 194.2 TOTALS 15.53 920.8 COMPOSITE CN 59.3 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 39 2.24 87.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 110 and 131, Hallandale and Riviera fine sand B/D 61 3.36 204.7 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 61 1.95 119.1 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.01 100.6 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 6.98 684.3 TOTALS 15.53 1195.9 COMPOSITE CN 77.0 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 •S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 6.87 1.31 1.70 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 2.99 2.71 3.50 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.81 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 6.87 5.21 6.74 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 2.99 7.61 9.85 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.11 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.65 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.64 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 3-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 Basin Location and From STATo STA Size Typical Section ROW 96+10. 129+30. Basin Length 3,320 LF 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area = 12.58 ac Paved Area = Basin (ROW Area) _ Treated Paved Area = 6.98 ac Percent Impervious = Pond Site Area = 3.48 ac 56% Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 16.05 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = 1.34 Ac-Ft B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = 1.45 Ac-Ft 1.45 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 2.18 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 0.67 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.25 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.40 ac Water Quantity PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (xc) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 49 2.41 118.0 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 110 and 131, Hallandale and Riviera fine sand B/D 69 3.61 249.3 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban A/D 25 1.83 45.7 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 110 and 131, Hallandale and Riviera fine sand B/D 55 2.74 150.9 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 131 and 128 B/D and CID 63 3.48 217.2 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.98 194.2 TOTALS 16.05 975.3 COMPOSITE CN 60.8 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 102, Boca fine sand -Urban AD 39 2.24 87.2 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 110, Hallandale fine sand B/D 61 3.36 204.7 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 131 and 128 B/D and C/D 68 2.21 149.3 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.26 126.3 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 6.98 1 684.3 TOTALS 16.05 1251.9 COMPOSITE CN 78.0 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN ) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / ( P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 6.46 1.41 1.89 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 2.82 2.80 3.74 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.85 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 6.46 5.41 7.24 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 2.82 7.74 10.35 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.11 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.67 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.62 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 4-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 129+30. Basin Location and To STA 155+80. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 10.04 Ac Treated Paved Area = 5.98 ac Pond Site Area = 4.20 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 14.24 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,650 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 60% 1.19 Ac-Ft 1.24 Ac-Ft 1.24 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1 1.87 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.59 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20 % of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.25 ac F.1 2.5 % of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.36 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 113 and 125,Holopaw and Oldsmar fine sand A/D 49 2.64 129.5 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 131 Riviera fine sand B; D 69 2.16 149.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 113 and 125,Holopaw and Oldsmar fine sand A 1) 25 2.01 50.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 131 Riviera fine sand B; D 55 1.64 90.3 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 131 Riviera fine sand 13 D 55 4.20 230.9 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.58 155.0 TOTALS 14.24 805.2 COMPOSITE CN 56.6 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 113 and 125,Holopaw and Oldsmar fine sand A/D 39 2.23 87.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 131 Riviera fine sand B/D 61 1.83 111.5 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 131 Riviera fine sand B/D 61 2.93 178.5 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.27 127.2 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.98 585.6 TOTALS 14.24 1089.9 COMPOSITE CN 76.6 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 *S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 7.68 1.13 1.34 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.06 2.67 3.16 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.82 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 7.68 4.83 5.73 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.06 7.55 8.96 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.23 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.59 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.50 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: 113asin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 4-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 129+30. Basin Location and To STA 155+80. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 10.04 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.98 ac Pond Site Area = 3.27 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 13.31 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,650 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 60% 1.11 Ac-Ft 1.24 Ac-Ft 1.24 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1 1.87 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.55 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.22 ac F.1 2.51% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.33 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 113 and 125,Holopaw and Oldsmar fine sand A/D 49 2.64 129.5 Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 131 Riviera fine sand B/D 69 2.16 149.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 113 and 125,Holopaw and Oldsmar fine sand A/D 25 2.01 50.2 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 131 Riviera fine sand B/D 55 1.64 90.3 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 102 Boca fine sand A/D 25 3.27 81.7 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.58 155.0 TOTALS 13.31 656.0 COMPOSITE CN 49.3 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 113 and 125,Holopaw and Oldsmar fine sand A/D 39 2.23 87.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 131 Riviera fine sand B/D 61 1.83 111.5 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 102 Boca fine sand A/D 39 2.19 85.4 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.08 107.9 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.98 585.6 TOTALS 13.31 977.6 COMPOSITE CN 73.5 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 •S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 10.29 0.69 0.77 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.61 2.40 2.66 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.89 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 10.29 3.81 4.22 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.61 7.14 7.92 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.70 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.55 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.01 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: Basin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: jBasin 5-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 Basin Location and From STA 155+80.To STA 182+20. Site Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area = 10.00 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.56 ac Pond Site Area = 5.2F ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 15.22 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,640 LF Paved Area = Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 56% 1.27 Ac-Ft 1.16 Ac-Ft 1.27 Ac-Ft C.1 0 Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody c- D.1 0.5 " Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.63 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = 0.45 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.38 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 49 4.79 234.6 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 3.64 90.9 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 55 5.22 287.1 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.58 154.4 TOTALS 15.22 767.0 COMPOSITE CN 50.4 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 4.44 173.3 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 61 2.99 182.6 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 2.23 222.6 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.56 544.6 TOTALS 15.22 1123.1 COMPOSITE CN 73.8 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = ( P - 0.2*S)^2 / ( P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 9.84 0.76 0.96 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.55 2.43 3.08 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 2.12 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 9.84 3.96 5.02 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.55 7.18 9.11 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 4.09 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.63 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.36 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: I Basin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 5-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 155+80. Basin Location and To STA 182+20. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area = 10.0 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.56 ac Pond Site Area = 3.5T ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 13.55 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,640 LF Paved Area = Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 56% 1.13 Ac-Ft 1.16 Ac-Ft L16 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.74 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.56 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E. 20°/u of Wet Detention Area = 0.27 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.34 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 49 4.79 234.6 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) It 3, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 3.64 90.9 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 113, 125, 131, 120 A/D, B/D 30 3.55 106.4 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.58 154.4 TOTALS 13.55 j 586.3 COMPOSITE CN 43.3 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 4.44 173.3 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 113, 125, 131, 120 A/D, B/D 43 2.17 93.4 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.37 137.5 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.56 544.6 TOTALS 13.55 j 948.7 COMPOSITE CN 70.0 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S---------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 13.10 0.39 0.45 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 4.28 2.11 2.39 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.94 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 13.10 2.96 3.34 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 4.28 6.68 7.54 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 4.20 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.56 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.37 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: I Basin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 5-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 155+80. Basin Location and To STA 182+20. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area = 10.00 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.56 ac Pond Site Area = 5.84 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 15.84 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,640 LF Paved Area = Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 56% 1.32 Ac-Ft 1.16 Ac-Ft 1.32 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.98 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.66 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = 0.67 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.40 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) It 3, Holopaw fine sand A/D 49 4.79 234.6 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 3.64 90.9 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 113, 120, 117 A/D and B/D 30 5.84 175.3 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.58 154.4 TOTALS 15.84 j 655.2 COMPOSITE CN 41.4 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) It 3, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 4.44 173.3 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 113, 120, 117 A/D and B/D 43 2.48 106.8 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 113, 120, 117 100 3.36 335.8 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.56 544.6 TOTALS 15.84 j 1160.5 COMPOSITE CN 73.3 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)^2 / (P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 14.18 0.31 0.41 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.65 2.38 3.14 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 2.73 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 14.18 2.69 3.55 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.65 7.11 9.39 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 5.84 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.66 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 7.16 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: I Basin Water Quality and Quantity Calculations MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 5-4 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 155+80. Basin Location and To STA 182+20. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area = 10.00 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.56 ac Pond Site Area = 53T ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 15.39 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,640 LF Paved Area = Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 56% 1.28 Ac-Ft 1.16 Ac-Ft 1.28 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.92 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 1 0.64 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = 0.64 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.38 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) It 3, Holopaw fine sand A/D 49 4.79 234.6 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 3.64 90.9 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 113 and 125 A/D 25 5.39 134.7 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.58 154.4 TOTALS 15.39 614.E COMPOSITE CN 39.9 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) It 3, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 4.44 173.3 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 113, 120, 117 A/D 39 2.21 86.3 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 3.18 317.5 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.56 544.6 TOTALS 15.39 j 1121.7 COMPOSITE CN 72.9 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)^2 / (P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 15.04 0.26 0.33 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.72 2.35 3.01 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 2.69 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 15.04 2.49 3.20 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.72 7.06 9.06 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 5.86 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.64 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 7.15 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: JCN and SCS Runoff Volume Calculation MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 6-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 182+20. Basin Location and To STA 205+00. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 8.64 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.11 ac Pond Site Area = 2.58 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 11.22 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,280 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 59% 0.93 Ac-Ft 1.06 Ac-Ft 1.06 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.60 Ac-Ft D. 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 0.47 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20 % of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.26 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.28 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 49 2.48 121.6 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 69 1.65 114.1 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 1.88 47.1 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 55 1.26 69.1 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 2.58 64.5 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 136 133.4 TOTALS 11.22 549.8 COMPOSITE CN 49.0 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 2.12 82.5 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 61 1.41 86.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 1.27 49.4 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.31 131.4 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.11 500.7 TOTALS 11.22 850.1 COMPOSITE CN 75.8 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 *S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 10.40 0.68 0.63 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.20 2.60 2.43 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.79 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 10.40 3.77 3.52 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.20 7.45 6.96 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.44 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.00 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 5.04 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: JCN and SCS Runoff Volume Calculation MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 6-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 From STA 182+20. Basin Location and To STA 205+00. Size Typical Section ROW 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area= 8.64 ac Treated Paved Area = 5.11 ac Pond Site Area = 2.16 ac Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 10.79 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = Water Quantity Basin Length 2,280 LF Paved Area + Basin (ROW Area) _ Percent Impervious = 59% 0.90 Ac-Ft 1.06 Ac-Ft 1.06 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.60 Ac-Ft D. 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 0.45 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume E.1 20 % of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.17 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.27 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 49 2.48 121.6 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 69 1.65 114.1 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 1.88 47.1 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 55 1.26 69.1 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 113 and 120 A/D 25 2.16 53.9 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.36 133.4 TOTALS 10.79 539.1 COMPOSITE CN 50.0 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 2.12 82.5 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 61 1.41 86.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 113 and 120 A/D 39 1.28 50.1 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 0.87 87.1 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.11 500.7 TOTALS 10.79 806.4 COMPOSITE CN 74.7 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / (P + 0.8 *S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 10.02 0.73 0.66 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.38 2.51 2.25 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.60 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 10.02 3.90 3.51 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.38 7.31 6.57 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.07 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.00 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.66 PROJECT TITLE: lWilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: JCN and SCS Runoff Volume Calculation MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: 113asin 6-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 Basin Location and From STATo STA Size Typical Section ROW 182+20. 205+00. Basin Length 2,280 LF 165 LF Water Quality Typical Section ROW x Basin Length = Basin ROW Area = 8.64 ac Paved Area = Basin (ROW Area) _ Treated Paved Area = 5.11 ac Percent Impervious = Pond Site Area = 3.31 ac 59% Total (ROW + Pond) Basin Area = 11.95 ac A.1 1.0 " Over Total Basin Area = 1.00 Ac-Ft B.1 2.5 " Over Treated Paved Area = 1.06 Ac-Ft 1.06 Ac-Ft C.1 50% Additional Treatment Volume for Impaired Waterbody 1.60 Ac-Ft D.1 0.5 "Required Dry Detention or Retention Pre -Treatment as part of Required 0.50 Ac-Ft Treatment Volume Water Quantity E.1 20% of Wet Detention Area = Min Littoral Shelf Area = 0.21 ac F.1 2.5% of Wet Detention and Drainage Basin Areas = 0.30 ac PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Fair Condition) 113, Holopaw fine sand A/D 49 2.48 121.6 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 69 1.65 114.1 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) It 3, Holopaw fine sand A/D 25 1.88 47.1 Wood or Forest Land (Good Cover) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 55 1.26 69.1 Pond Site Area Wood or Forest Land 113 and 120 A/D 25 3.31 82.8 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 1.36 133.4 TOTALS 11.95 568.0 COMPOSITE CN 47.5 POST -DEVELOPED CONDITION BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET LAND -USE DESCRIPTION SOIL NAME SOIL GROUP CN AREA (ac) PRODUCT Open Spaces (Good Condition) It 3, Holopaw fine sand A/D 39 2.12 82.5 Open Spaces (Good Condition) 117, Immokalee fine sand B/D 61 1.41 86.1 Open Spaces (Good Condition, Pond Site) 113 and 120 A/D 39 2.28 88.8 Impervious (Open Water, Pond Site) 100 1.03 103.3 Impervious (Paved parking, roads, etc.) 98 5.11 1 500.7 TOTALS 11.95 861.4 COMPOSITE CN 72.1 ESTIMATE OF RUNOFF VOLUME PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME IS BASED ON THE SCS EQUATION AND IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) DETERMINE SOIL STORAGE - S--------------------------------> S = ( 1000 / CN ) - 10 2) DETERMINE RUNOFF - R--------------------------------> R = (P - 0.2*S)A2 / ( P + 0.8*S) P = rainfall in inches 3) DETERMINE RUNOFF VOLUME - V(R)--------------------------------> V(R) = (R / 12)*BASIN AREA (inches) (inches) (acres -feet) Agency Design Storm Frequency P (in) S (in) R (in) V(R) (ac-ft) FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (PRE) 5.10 11.03 0.60 0.60 FDOT Storm Drain 3 yr / 24 hr (POST) 5.10 3.87 2.28 2.27 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 1.68 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (PRE) 10.50 11.03 3.56 3.54 SFWMD Open Basin 25 yr / 72 hr (POST) 10.50 3.87 6.96 6.93 Required 25 yr / 72 hr Attenuation Volume (ac-ft) 3.38 Dry Detention or Retention Treatment Volume (ac-ft) 0.50 Wet Detention: Treatment Volume (Vt) + Estimated Peak Attenuation Volume (Vpost - Vpre) (ac-ft) 4.48 Attachment 3 Pond Size Calculations PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 1-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 57+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 10.0 to 13.0 ft Boca fine sand (102, A/D) and Chobee, limestone Pond Site Soil Type = substratum -Dania, ponded (105, C/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0.0 to 0.5 ft Estimated SHWT = 11.00 ft Distance to Discharge Point = 3800 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.7 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.5 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum NWL = 12.0 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Cypress Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 Berm Elevation = 14.5 Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 12.0 Clearance to ESHWT = 1.0 SH Available = 1.5 STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REOUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.23 Volume Peak (cf) = 227626 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION ft 12.0 ft. ft 14.5 ft. ft 14.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 13.5 ft. ft. 12.0 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 1.5 ft. Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 Dry Detention 0.69 30090 2.3 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 1-1.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to hnmokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 1-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 6.0 SH = 1.5 ft 1.5 ft L = 399 ft 326 ft W = 363 ft 54 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 3.32 acres 0.41 acres STEP NO. 5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 417 ft 338 ft Width @ Top of SH = 381 ft 66 ft Pond Area at SH = 3.64 acres 0.51 acres Volume Provided at SH = 5.23 ac-ft 0.69 ac-ft Volume Required = 5.23 ac-ft 0.69 ac-ft STEP NO. 6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 1 > ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 465 ft 376 ft Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 429 ft 104 ft Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 4.58 acres 0.90 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 5.26 acres 1.04 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 6.30 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 2.16 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 12.5 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 1750 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 0.9 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.1 ft (OK) STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 375 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 411 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 339 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 375 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 2.92 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 3.54 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.41 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.62 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 1-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 70+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 10.0 to 14.0 ft Pond Site Soil Type = Boca fine sand (102, A/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 10.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 2500 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.7 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.5 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum NWL = 11.2 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Cypress Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 . . Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 11.2 ft. 11.5 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = 0.7 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 2.3 ft. 2.0 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.92 0.64 Volume Peak (cf) = 257973 28075 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 1.5 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 1-2.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to hnmokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 1-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = Z..0 6.0 SH = 2.3 ft 2.0 ft L = 453 ft 262 ft W = 226 ft 44 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 2.35 acres 0.26 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Wet Detention Dry Detention Length @ Top of SH = 480 ft 278 ft Width @ Top of SH = 254 ft 60 ft Pond Area at SH = 2.80 acres 0.38 acres Volume Provided at SH = 5.92 ac-ft 0.64 ac-ft Volume Required = 5.92 ac-ft 0.64 ac-ft STEP NO. 6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 528 ft. 316 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 302 ft. 98 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 3.66 acres 0.71 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 4.21 acres 0.81 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 5.02 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM V MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 2.30 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 12.0 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 3000 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.5 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.0 ft (OK) STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 429 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 465 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 202 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 238 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 1.99 Top of Littoral Area (1' above NWL) = 2.54 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.39 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.55 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 2-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 88+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 12.0 ft. Boca fine sand -Urban (102, A/D) and Hallandale fine Pond Site Soil Type = sand (110, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0.5 to 1.0 ft. Estimated SHWT = 11.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 675 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.7 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.5 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.2 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Cypress Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.2 ft. 12.5 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -1.3 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 3.3 ft. 1.0 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.41 0.60 Volume Peak (cf) = 192036 26277 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 0.4 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 2-1.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 2-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = `' 2.0 SH = 3.3 ft 1.0 ft L = 311 ft 223 ft W = 155 ft 112 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.11 acres 0.57 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 350 ft 231 ft Width @ Top of SH = 195 ft 120 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.57 acres 0.63 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.410 ac-ft 0.602 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.409 ac-ft 0.603 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 398 ft. 269 ft. Width @ Outside Maintenaace Berm = 243 ft. 158 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.22 acres 0.97 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.55 acres 1.12 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 3.67 acres STEP NO. 7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.59 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.4 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 1900 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.0 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 2.2 ft (OK) STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 287 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 323 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 131 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 167 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.86 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.24 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.22 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.38 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 2-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 88+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 12 to 14 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Boca fine sand -Urban (102, A/D) and Hallandale fine sand (110, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0.5 to 1.0 ft. Estimated SHWT = 11.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = Positive Drainage Gradient = Discharge Point NWL Estimation = Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 425 0.06% 9.7 12.5 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.0 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Cypress Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 Berm Elevation = 14.5 Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.0 Clearance to ESHWT = -1.5 SH = 3.5 STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REOUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: ft. 12.0 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 13.5 ft. ft. 12.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.33 Volume Peak (cf) = 188561 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 Dry Detention 0.60 26096 0.3 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 2-2.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 2-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = ? a 25 SH = 3.5 ft 1.0 ft L = 296 ft 249 ft W = 148 ft 99 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.00 acres 0.57 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 338 ft 257 ft Width @ Top of SH = 190 ft 107 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.47 acres 0.63 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.33 ac-ft 0.60 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.33 ac-ft 0.60 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 386 ft. 295 ft. Width @ Outside Maintenaace Berm = 238 ft. 145 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.10 acres 0.98 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.42 acres 1.13 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 3.55 acres STEP NO. 7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.55 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.1 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2780 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.4 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 2.1 ft (OK) STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 272 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 308 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 124 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 160 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.77 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.13 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.20 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.36 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 2-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 1.2 1.0 SH = 3.7 ft 0.5 ft L = 225 ft 232 ft W = 188 ft 232 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 0.97 acres 1.23 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 270 ft 236 ft Length @ Top of SH = 232 ft 236 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.44 acres 1.27 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.45 ac-ft 0.63 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.45 ac-ft 0.63 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 318 ft. 274 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 280 ft. 274 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.04 acres 1.72 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.35 acres 1.97 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 4.32 acres STEP NO. 7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM V MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.56 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.1 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point 3100 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.6 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.9 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 201 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 237 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 164 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 200 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.76 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.09 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.19 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.33 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 2-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 94+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 12 to 14 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Boca fine sand -Urban (102, A/D) and Riviera fine sand (131, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0 to 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 12.0 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 50 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.7 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.5 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 9.8 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Cypress Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 9.8 ft. 13.0 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -2.2 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 3.7 ft. 0.5 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.45 0.63 Volume Peak (cf) = 193841 27312 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 0.03 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 2-3.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 2-4 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: Pond Site Location = STA. 78+00, LT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 12.0 ft. a. Check of Pond Site Conditions Pond Site Soil Type = Boca fine sand -Urban (102, A/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 11.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point 1700 LF Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% _ b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.7 Cypress Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.5 Canal c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.8 ft. Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) Storage Height (SH) = Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = Berm Elevation Freeboard to DHW = Maximum DHW Elevation = Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = Clearance to ESHWT = SH = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. 10.8 ft. 12.5 ft. -0.7 ft. 1.0 ft. 2.7 ft. 1.0 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.38 Volume Peak (cf) = 234328 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 Dry Detention 0.64 27748 1.02 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 2-4.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 2-4 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = ' z 2.7 SH = 2.7 ft 1.0 ft L = 340 ft 266 ft W = 227 ft 99 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.77 acres 0.60 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 373 ft 274 ft Length @ Top of SH = 259 ft 107 ft Pond Area at SH = 2.22 acres 0.67 acres Volume Provided at SH = 5.38 ac-ft 0.64 ac-ft Volume Required = 5.38 ac-ft 0.64 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 421 ft. 312 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 307 ft. 145 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.97 acres 1.04 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 3.41 acres 1.19 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 4.60 acres STEP NO. 7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.93 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.8 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 1500 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 0.8 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 2.0 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 316 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 352 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 203 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 239 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 1.47 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.93 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.35 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.46 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 3-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 102+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 12.0 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Boca fine sand -Urban (102, A/D) and Riviera fine sand (131, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0 to 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 11.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 50 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.7 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.5 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 9.8 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO. 2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Cypress Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 Berm Elevation = 14.5 Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 9.8 Clearance to ESHWT = -1.7 SH = 3.7 STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REOUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: ft. 12.0 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 13.5 ft. ft. 12.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. Wet Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.40 Volume Peak (cf) = 235326 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 Dry Detention 0.67 29087 0.0 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 3-1.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 3-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = ' z 2 3 SH = 3.7 ft 1.0 ft L = 280 ft 252 ft W = 187 ft 110 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.20 acres 0.63 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 324 ft 260 ft Length @ Top of SH = 231 ft 118 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.72 acres 0.70 acres Volume Provided at SH = 5.40 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft Volume Required = 5.40 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 372 ft. 298 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 279 ft. 156 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.39 acres 1.06 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.74 acres 1.22 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 3.97 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 2.06 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.2 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 3100 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.6 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.7 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 256 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 292 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 163 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 199 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.96 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.33 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.24 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.38 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 3-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 98+00, LT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 12 to 14 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Hallandale fine sand (110, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 1.0 ft. Estimated SHWT = 11.0 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 50 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.7 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.5 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 9.8 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Cypress Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 Berm Elevation = 14.5 Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 9.8 Clearance to ESHWT = -1.2 SH = 3.7 STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REOUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: ft. 12.0 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 13.5 ft. ft. 12.0 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 1.5 ft. Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.64 Volume Peak (cf) = 202171 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 Dry Detention 0.65 28193 0.0 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 3-2.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 3-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = ? a 4.0 SH = 3.7 ft 1.5 ft L = 296 ft 259 ft W = 148 ft 65 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.01 acres 0.38 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 340 ft 271 ft Length @ Top of SH = 192 ft 77 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.50 acres 0.48 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.64 ac-ft 0.65 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.64 ac-ft 0.65 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 388 ft. 309 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 240 ft. 115 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.14 acres 0.81 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.47 acres 0.94 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 3.40 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.81 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2900 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA 11.2 1.5 ft 1.8 ft (OK) Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 272 Length C Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 308 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 124 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 160 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.77 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.13 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.20 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.36 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 3-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: Pond Site Location = STA. 120+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 12.0 ft. a. Check of Pond Site Conditions Pond Site Soil Type = Riviera and Pineda fine sand (131, B/D and 128, C/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 11.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 700 LF Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% = 0.4 ft. (vertical) b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Corkscrew Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 Canal c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NAIL = 10.4 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 Berm Elevation = 14.5 Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.4 Clearance to ESHWT = -1.1 SH = 3.1 STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REOUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: ft. 12.0 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 13.5 ft. ft. 12.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.62 Volume Peak (cf) = 201410 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 Dry Detention 0.67 29133 filename: Pond 3-3.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 3-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 2 5 SH = 3.1 ft 1.0 ft L = 332 ft 263 ft W = 166 ft 105 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.26 acres 0.64 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 369 ft 271 ft Length @ Top of SH = 203 ft 113 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.72 acres 0.70 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.62 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.62 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 417 ft. 309 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 251 ft. 151 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.40 acres 1.07 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.76 acres 1.23 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 4.00 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.85 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2750 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA 11.6 1.4 ft 1.5 ft (OK) Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 308 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 344 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 142 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 178 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 1.00 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.40 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.25 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.40 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 4-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 146+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 12.5 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Riviera fine sand (131, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 12.0 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 700 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.4 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Corkscrew Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.4 ft. 13.0 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -1.6 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 3.1 ft. 0.5 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.50 0.59 Volume Peak (cf) = 196200 25837 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 0.4 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 4-1.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 4-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 1 5 SH = 3.1 ft 0.5 ft L = 279 ft 293 ft W = 199 ft 195 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.27 acres 1.31 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 316 ft 297 ft Length @ Top of SH = 236 ft 199 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.71 acres 1.36 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.62 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.62 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 364 ft. 335 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 284 ft. 237 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.37 acres 1.83 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.73 acres 2.10 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 4.83 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM V MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.82 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.6 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2200 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.1 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.8 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 255 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 291 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 175 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 211 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 1.02 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.41 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.25 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.38 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 4-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 139+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 12 to 14 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Boca fine sand (102, A/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 11.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 50 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.0 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Corkscrew Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.0 ft. 12.5 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -1.5 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 3.5 ft. 1.0 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.01 0.55 Volume Peak (cf) = 218208 24154 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 0.0 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 4-2.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to hnmokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 4-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = ? a 2.0 SH = 3.5 ft 1.0 ft L = 307 ft 235 ft W = 153 ft 118 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.08 acres 0.63 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 349 ft 243 ft Length @ Top of SH = 195 ft 126 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.56 acres 0.70 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.62 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.62 ac-ft 0.67 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 397 ft. 281 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 243 ft. 164 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.22 acres 1.05 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.55 acres 1.21 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 3.76 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM V MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.89 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.4 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2800 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.4 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.7 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 283 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 319 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 129 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 165 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.84 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.21 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.22 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.37 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 5-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 171+00, LT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 13.0 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Immokalee fine sand (117, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 1.0 ft. Estimated SHWT = 12.0 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 2200 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 11.3 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Corkscrew Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 11.3 ft. 13.0 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -0.7 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 2.2 ft. 0.5 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.36 0.63 Volume Peak (cf) = 233281 27624 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 1.3 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 5-1.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 5-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = `' 1.0 SH = 2.2 ft 0.5 ft L = 443 ft 233 ft W = 219 ft 233 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 2.23 acres 1.25 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 469 ft 237 ft Length @ Top of SH = 246 ft 237 ft Pond Area at SH = 2.64 acres 1.29 acres Volume Provided at SH = 5.36 ac-ft 0.63 ac-ft Volume Required = 5.36 ac-ft 0.63 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 517 ft. 275 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 294 ft. 275 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 3.48 acres 1.74 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 4.01 acres 2.00 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 6.00 acres > Site 5-1 STEP NO. 7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 2.12 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 12.2 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 1100 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 0.6 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.8 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 419 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 455 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 195 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 231 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 1.87 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 2.41 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.38 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.54 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 5-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 157+00, RT, 18th AVE NE Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = a (dry detention). Varies 12 to 14 b (wet detention). Varies 13 to 14 Pond Site Soil Type = a. Holowpaw 113 and Oldsmar 125 (A/D) b. Riviera (131, B/D) and Malabar (120, A/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = a. Varies 0.5 to 1.0 ft b. Varies 0 to 0.5 ft Estimated SHWT = a. 11.5 ft. b.12.5 Distance to Discharge Point = 500 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.2 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Corkscrew Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.2 ft. 12.5 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -2.3 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 3.3 ft. 1.0 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.37 0.56 Volume Peak (cf) = 234098 24586 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L — Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 0.3 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 5-2.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 5-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = a 3.0 SH = 3.3 ft 1.0 ft L = 346 ft 264 ft W = 173 ft 88 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.37 acres 0.53 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 386 ft 272 ft Length @ Top of SH = 213 ft 96 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.88 acres 0.60 acres Volume Provided at SH = 5.38 ac-ft 0.56 ac-ft Volume Required = 5.37 ac-ft 0.56 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 434 ft. 310 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 261 ft. 134 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.60 acres 0.95 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.98 acres 1.09 acres TOTAL WET POND AREA REQUIREMENT 4.08 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.94 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.4 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2400 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.2 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.9 ft (OK) STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 322 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 358 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 149 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 185 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 1.10 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.52 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.34 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.42 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 5-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 162+00 LT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 12 to 14 ft Holowpaw 113 and Malabar 120 (A/D), Immokalee Pond Site Soil Type = (117, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0.5 to 1.0 ft Estimated SHWT = 11.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 2600 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 11.5 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Corkscrew Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 Berm Elevation = 14.5 Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 11.5 Clearance to ESHWT = 0.0 SH = 2.0 STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REOUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: ft. 12.0 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 14.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 13.5 ft. ft. 12.5 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. ft. 1.0 ft. Wet Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 7.16 Volume Peak (cf) = 311847 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 Dry Detention 0.66 28753 1.6 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 5-3.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 5-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 3.0 SH = 2.0 ft 1.0 ft L = 468 ft 286 ft W = 312 ft 95 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 3.36 acres 0.62 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 492 ft 294 ft Length @ Top of SH = 336 ft 103 ft Pond Area at SH = 3.80 acres 0.70 acres Volume Provided at SH = 7.16 ac-ft 0.66 ac-ft Volume Required = 7.16 ac-ft 0.66 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 540 ft. 332 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 384 ft. 141 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 4.77 acres 1.07 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 5.48 acres 1.24 acres TOTAL WET POND AREA REQUIREMENT 6.72 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 2.73 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 12.3 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 1750 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 0.9 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.4 ft (OK) STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 444 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 480 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 288 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 324 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 2.94 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 3.58 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.40 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.64 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 5-4 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 162+00 LT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 12 to 14 ft Pond Site Soil Type = Holowpaw 113 and Oldsmar 125 (A/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0.5 to 1.0 ft Estimated SHWT = 11.0 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 2500 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 11.4 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention and Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Corkscrew Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 12.0 ft. 12.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Berm Elevation = 14.5 ft. 14.5 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 13.5 ft. 13.5 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 11.4 ft. 12.0 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = 0.4 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 2.1 ft. 1.5 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 7.15 0.64 Volume Peak (cf) = 311242 27929 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 1.5 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 5-4.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 5-4 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION cont. Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 1.6 4.0 SH = 2.1 ft 1.5 ft L = 465 ft 258 ft W = 298 ft 64 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 3.18 acres 0.38 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 490 ft 270 ft Length @ Top of SH = 323 ft 76 ft Pond Area at SH = 3.63 acres 0.47 acres Volume Provided at SH = 7.15 ac-ft 0.64 ac-ft Volume Required = 7.15 ac-ft 0.64 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 538 ft. 308 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 371 ft. 114 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 4.58 acres 0.81 acres Contingency = 15% 15% Pond Area Requirement = 5.27 acres 0.93 acres TOTAL WET POND AREA REQUIREMENT 6.20 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 2.69 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 12.2 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 1700 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 0.9 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 14.5 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 1.5 ft (OK) STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 441 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 477 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 274 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 310 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 2.77 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 3.39 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.38 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.62 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 6-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 198+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 14.0 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Holopaw fine sand (113, A/D) and Immokalee fine sand (117, B/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = Varies 0.5 to 1 ft. Estimated SHWT = 13.0 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 1400 LF Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% _ Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Corkscrew Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 Canal Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.8 ft. The pond(s) will be a combination of: 0.8 ft. (vertical) Wet Detention (Dry Detention not feasible at estimated SHUT) STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) Storage Height (SH) = Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = Berm Elevation = Freeboard to DHW = Maximum DHW Elevation = Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = Clearance to ESHWT = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL 12.0 ft. 15.0 ft. 15.0 ft. 1.0 ft. 14.0 ft. 10.8 ft. -2.2 ft. SH = 3.2 ft. STEP NO. 3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 5.04 Volume Peak (cf) = 219459 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 filename: Pond 6-1.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 6-1 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = SH = 3.2 ft L = 414 ft W = 138 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.31 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 Length @ Top of SH = 453 ft Length @ Top of SH = 177 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.84 acres Volume Provided at SH = 5.04 ac-ft Volume Required = 5.04 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 501 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 225 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.58 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.97 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 2.97 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 1' MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.79 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 1100 Roadway Low Point EL = 15.0 STEP NO.8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 390 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 114 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 1.02 Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.26 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.9 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 0.6 ft HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 2.5 ft (OK) Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 426 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 150 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.47 acres Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.45 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 6-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: Pond Site Location = STA. 198+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = 14.0 ft. a. Check of Pond Site Conditions Pond Site Soil Type = Holopaw and Malabar fine sand (113 and 120, A/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 13.5 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 50 LF Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% = 0.0 ft. (vertical) b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Corkscrew Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 Canal c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.0 ft. Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention (Djy Detention not feasible at estimated SHWT) STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 13.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 15.0 ft. Berm Elevation = 15.0 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 14.0 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.0 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -3.5 ft. SH = 4.0 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REOUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.66 Volume Peak (cf) = 203061 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 filename: Pond 6-2.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 6-2 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 14 a SH = 4.0 ft L = 390 ft W = 97 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 0.87 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 Length @ Top of SH = 438 ft Length @ Top of SH = 145 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.46 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.66 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.66 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 486 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 193 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.16 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.48 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 2.48 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM V MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.60 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.4 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2750 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.4 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 15.0 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 2.3 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 366 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 402 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 73 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 109 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.62 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.01 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.17 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.39 (OK) PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 1 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 POND DESIGNATION: Pond 6-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO. 1 - POND LOCATION, TYPE, AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS Based upon design criteria, a combination of Wet Detention and Dry Detention/Retention is required. Positive drainage from proposed pond to discharge point at canal is required. Treatment and the peak attenuation volumes are constrained to the storage height (SH) calculated as follows: a. Check of Pond Site Conditions b. Check of Tailwater Conditions Pond Site Location = STA. 181+00 and STA 186+00, RT Pond Site Existing Ground Elevation = Varies 12 to 14 ft. Pond Site Soil Type = Holopaw fine sand (113, A/D) Pond Site Estimated Depth to Groundwater = 0.5 ft. Estimated SHWT = 12.0 ft. Distance to Discharge Point = 1150 Positive Drainage Gradient = 0.06% Discharge Point NWL Estimation = 9.9 Discharge Point Peak Stage Estimation = 12.7 c. Summary of Controlling Soils and Minimum Wet Detention NWL = 10.6 Tailwater Conditions The pond(s) will be a combination of: Wet Detention Dry Detention STEP NO.2 - STORAGE HEIGHT ESTIMATE (BASED UPON SHWT AND TAILWATER) LF Corkscrew Canal ft. Storage Height (SH) = Maximum DHW - Pond NWL Maximum DHW - Pond Bottom Minimum Existing Roadway Elevation = 13.0 ft. 13.0 ft. Minimum Proposed Roadway Elevation = 15.0 ft. 15.0 ft. Berm Elevation = 15.0 ft. 15.0 ft. Freeboard to DHW = 1.0 ft. 1.0 ft. Maximum DHW Elevation = 14.0 ft. 14.0 ft. Proposed Wet Pond NWL / Dry Pond Bottom EL = 10.6 ft. 13.0 ft. Clearance to ESHWT = -1.4 ft. 1.0 ft. SH = 3.4 ft. 1.0 ft. STEP NO.3 - TOTAL PEAK STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT The Total Peak Storage Volume Required is: Wet Detention Dry Detention Volume Peak (ac-ft) = 4.48 0.50 Volume Peak (cf) = 195270 21684 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Volume = Length*Width*Height, where Volume is from Step No. 3, and, L = Length of Pond, W = Width of Pond and SH = Storage Height from Step No. 2 0.7 ft. (vertical) filename: Pond 6-3.xls worksheet: RW REQUIREMENT PT.1 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson Boulevard: Golden Gate Boulevard to hnmokalee Road SUBJECT: R/W Requirement Estimate Pt. 2 MADE BY: AS 11/16/21 BASIN DESIGNATION: Pond 6-3 CHECKED BY: DL 11/17/21 STEP NO.4 - POND CONFIGURATION Wet Detention Dry Detention L/W Ratio Based on Available Parcel Dims = 6.0 SH = 3.4 ft 1.0 ft L = 474 ft 347 ft W = 95 ft 58 ft Pond Area at Control/Bot EL = 1.03 acres 0.46 acres STEP NO.5 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES TO STORAGE HEIGHT (SH) Wet Detention Wet Detention Side slopes are 1: 6 4 Length @ Top of SH = 515 ft 355 ft Length @ Top of SH = 136 ft 66 ft Pond Area at SH = 1.60 acres 0.54 acres Volume Provided at SH = 4.48 ac-ft 0.50 ac-ft Volume Required = 4.48 ac-ft 0.50 ac-ft STEP NO.6 - ACCOUNTING FOR THE POND SIDE SLOPES FROM (SH) TO MAINTENANCE BERMS AND BERM WIDTHS Wet Detention Dry Detention Side slopes are 1: 4 4 Desired Maintenance Berm Widths = 20 ft. 15 ft. Length @ Outside Maintenance Berm = 563 ft. 393 ft. Width @ Outside Maintennace Berm = 184 ft. 104 ft. Minimum Pond Area Requirement = 2.37 acres 0.94 acres Contingency = 15% Pond Area Requirement = 2.73 acres 1.08 acres TOTAL WET AND DRY POND AREA REQUIREMENT 3.81 acres STEP NO.7 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM V MIN HGL CLEARANCE AND ENERGY LOSSES 3 yr / 24 hr Attenuation Volume = 1.68 ac-ft 3 yr 24 hr Pond EL = 11.9 Length Between Pond and Roadway Low Point = 2000 ft. Energy Losses @ 0.05% = 1.0 ft Roadway Low Point EL = 15.0 HGL Clearance at Roadway Low Point = 2.1 ft (OK) STEP NO. 8 - CHECK OF ESTIMATED LITTORAL AREA Length @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 450 Length @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 486 Width @ Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 71 Width @ Top of Littoral Area (ft) = 107 Bot of Littoral Area (2' below NWL) = 0.73 Top of Littoral Area (F above NWL) = 1.19 acres Littoral Area Requirement (acres) = 0.21 Littoral Area Provided (acres) = 0.46 (OK) Attachment 4 Supporting Documentation From: AbbottAlicia To: Gramer, Bill/SWF Cc: Shepard, Anaela/ORL; Kirby, Felicia; LibbyPamela Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Stormwater Pond Setbacks Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 4:55:07 PM Attachments: imaae001.ona From a CDM Smith e-mail dated April 27, 2018 • "Under rule 62-555.312 a well cannot be sited closer than 50 feet from surface water. On the other hand, if the well goes in first, then the surface water feature must be sited at least 300 feet from the well to conform with ERP requirements." Regards, Alicia Abbott E.I., PMP Project Manager Collier County Government Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, FL 34112 Phone: 239-252-5344 Cell: 239-877-3961 From: Gramer, Bill/SWF <Bill.Gramer@jacobs.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 10:16 AM To: AbbottAlicia <Alicia.Abbott@colliercountyfl.gov>; LibbyPamela <Pamela.Libby@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Shepard, Angela/ORL <Angela.Shepard@jacobs.com>; Kirby, Felicia <Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com> Subject: Stormwater Pond Setbacks EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Alicia, We are trying to locate potential ponds along Wilson Boulevard and as you would imagine the existing wells limit available sites. Can you please send me the County's required Setbacks for Ponds Vs. Well Heads Pond Built First = Well Built First= • SFWMD Criteria shows 100 ft from Public Wells and 75 Ft from Private Wells • The FDEP Wellfield Protection Act 500 ft Setback does not really address Stormwater facilities Thanks Bill Gramer, P.E., AICP Vice President Transportation D 239-431-9222 M 239-860-4922 JACOBS 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd., Suite 505 Naples, Florida 34108 NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Wilson Bvld Corridor Study Bonita Say i 77 L O a CJ t q ) Club Naples 03 M Heritage o 1846 - Bay Golf d 327$t7� {a Country Club L 2.5Cr,Ave NW Rlnciall Blvd Boulder Lake 0 E u� fm rrlok atee`f'td 8du 24t11 Avv' N"N 2 4th Av4: NF mm i' L 22 rd A,j�7 N IN 22 rd AvV , NE: . D r as 00 rz — — a c`ara.Pf, aJ a f~ . loth A,,{ Na4' 1N Lth Awe L Calu �Lli Y „ Pi ne Goylf C I LLJ CL 18th Ave NIN 1 Rth Ave NE . - :. - .... - �- � Jung Eilvd '.'4' Jun BIV0 E 9 _ - 1r,th Ave NIN 1e:ih Ave NE ri eland Rd 1-1I.h Awe NVV 32735 1 4tr7 Ave NE Goff 12th &vt, N'A �' 12th Ave NF. Clubof the; Olde Eve rgLade s Florida m Golf 1 C.th AvF N4'd 10th Aye NL Club ; ,,7. W r = - w w w W z w u, w w z Zz 5 z u• 7 li v7 rfi r rp v] L r=_ 4f} m {V Tr v} C31 . N N ry 4V ry 8?u' Goldam Comte Bled "N 8�G,i (,e)VJen Gate El No F -.me Blvd .�' .j x A. Flaere Community Paik 2llh 2:'1 th 22nd 20th 16 th Ave N E 1:11h Ave NE 12th lot 9:1, .tVe N`_ 4'h A.,-f r-11 September 17, 2021 1:36,112 Waterbody IDs (WBIDs) 0 0.4 0.8 1.6 mi Group 1 0 0.5 1 2 km Verified List WBIDs FDEP/DEAR, FDEP, DEAR, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NIL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, FDEP,DEAR Map created by Map Direct, powered by ESRI. undefined Florida Department of Environmental Protection makes no warranty, expressed or implied,or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness,or usefulness of any information, apparatus,product,or process disclosed,or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Map Direct Search Results Fri Sep 17 2021 13:50:06 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Search Made: Search Box 502 feet wide at 26.25696152 x-81.60337190 26° 15'25.0615" x -81 °36' 12.1388" Search Results: 2 ■ Verified List Waterbody Ids (WBIDs) - Verified List WBIDs 1�3278S WBID 1� Everglades West Coast GROUP NAME 1� North Golden Gate WATERBODY NAME 009-2714 OGC NUMBER • 2 CYCLE E)GROUP 1 NUMBER ODissolved Oxygen PARAMETER ASSESSED ODissolved Oxygen PARAMETER GROUP O3F WATERBODY CLASS OStream WATERBODY TYPE ® Southwest Coast PLANNING UNIT 32785 WBID(ASSESSED) 32785 WBID (CURRENT) Waterbody IDs (WBIDs) in 3278S WBID IM Everglades West Coast GROUP NAME 1� NORTH GOLDEN GATE WATERBODY NAME (SD) South Regulatory District DISTRICT E 3F CLASS E Group 1 GROUP NUMBER O03090204 HUC Emiles UNITS E STREAM WATER TYPE R 72785.118637 PERIMETER id72.829 WATERBODY SIZE CHANGES WBID created, Run 30; WBID modified, Run 33 - K.ODonnell EDITS Southwest Coast PLANNING UNIT No Results Found in: • Florida Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) - Florida TMDLs • Restoration Plans • Statewide Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) General Areas Disclaimer: This report is only intended to be used as an approximation of the possibility of nearby regulated features. It is not intended for legal purposes. Neither the State of Florida,nor the FDEP,makes any warranty,expressed or implied,including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use or inability to use the data,or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness,or usefulness of any information,apparatus,product,or process disclosed,or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Use of information contained on the FDEP web pages constitutes understanding and acceptance of our disclaimer. NOTES TO USERS LEGEND This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated or additional flood hazard information. To obtain more detailed information in areas where Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and/or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood Profiles and Floodway Data and/or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded half -foot elevations. These BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes oses u onlyand should not be used as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data presented in the FIS report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes of construction and/or floodplain management. Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply only landward of 0.0' North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. Elevations shown in the Summaryof Stillwater Elevations table should be used far construction and/or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than elevations shown on this FIRM. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent floodway data are provided in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Refer to Section 2.4 "Hood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance Study report for information on flood control structures for this jurisdiction. The projection used in the preparation of this map was Florida State Plane east zone (FIPSZONE 0901). The horizontal datum was NAD 83, GRS1980 spheroid. Differences in datum, spheroid, projection or state plane zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across jurisdiction boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this FIRM. Flood elevations an this map are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. For information regarding conversion between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 visit the National Geodetic Surve website at htt ://www.n s.noaa. ov! or contact Y p 9 9 the National Geodetic Survey at the following address: NGS Information Services NOAA, NM GS12 National Geodetic Survey SSMC- 3. #9202 1315 East-West Highway Silver Sprinq, MD 20910- 3282 To obtain current elevation, description, and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map; please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713-3242, or visit its website at http:/Iwww.ngs.noaa.gov/. Base map information shown on this FIRM was derived from multiple sources. This information was compiled from Collier County Government (2003, 2008, 2009), U-S- Bureau of Land Management (2005), 3001, Inc. (2004), NOAA-National Geodetic Survey (2008), and U -S- Geological Survey (2009) at a scale of 1:24,000. Corporate limits shown on this map are based on the best data available at the time of publication. Because changes due to annexations or de -annexations may have occurred after this map was published, map users should contact appropriate community off icia]s to verify current corporate IimIt locations. Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county showing the layout of map panels: community map repository addresses: and a Listing of Communities table containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community as well as a listing of the panels on which each community is located. Contactthe FEMA Map Information eXchangeat 1-877-FEMA MAP (1 -877-336-262 7) for information on available products associated with this FIRM. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study report, and /or digital versions of this map. The FEMA Map Information eXchange may also be reached by Fax at 1-800-358-9620 and its website at httpllwww.msc.fema-gov/. If you have questions about this map or questions concerning the National Flood Insurance Program in general, please call 1-877-FEMA MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov/. 81 °37'30.00" 26-1845.00" 75.' 5 15" 14.5 - ZONE AE 13.5- 14 13.5-, 14 13.5- 14' 715000 FT 13.5 ZONE AH 710000 FT 14 I;• ZONE AH' H , - ZONE AE 14, ZONE AE ZONE AH 16 JOINS PANEL 0230 455000 FT 460000 FT 8TH 5T NE 10TH ST NE 12TH 5T NE 14TH ST NE 16TH ST NE 18TH 5T NE ZONE AH 465000 FT 470000 FT - - -SrH.ADY HOLL0Vn - 8L,rN..E 5 - ZONE s'i - u,i y+ � --- - _ r� _ w + ' - , i f•w ,. < 16 ZONE A F{ t - )LLwV BLVD W► AH _ -� r • �,r,, t -1'6 16 6 i. �} 76 ro ZC ri E A H 1 1'6 r J• 1 :� rA 1 2 0 7f5 - yy 75�5i ' '76• �t �S1 ��.ti ,. �1.5,5.�. f `•.�.. 20TH 5T iVE c" 7. 75.5 _ �.r �- �, `�-, � � - - ^: � ., r .,, ., 5 - 'lam• 1 I �� i� --� � �-, •:�:.. - .•. [xrlrlr►i f+ulr C rrrr< - ZOP .115.5 - ZONE AE 15.5 •ZQNE;AM. ZONE AH P0,RT ORANGE'WAY PORT R NGE CT {1 � �•rs iCIHESAPEAKE_0 r . POTO MAC CT•"' OCEAN 13E FF ` CT �. ; ZONE AE •••: 1 U Ar. ZONEAE ZONE_ �y r �';:•�JI�, ZONE `AE ZONE AH ZONE .. NE AH ;74.,5•• :;,4- ;r, ' AE 15.5 `• • •• • $•t ; 14 ��` .. I 1 ..... � d 14 5V _-4'1 _ d. 14 MYSTIC RIVER DR DG7325 OIL WELL HiG A'� VICTORY LN ZONE AE :. d•f -J- T GROVE DR ZONE PAR ❑R N A, ZONEc ORANGE AE . 73.59" I ZONE ' . GROVE TRL lW.�_ z AE ZONE r,.•� _ - ZONE u ' �r7 1 r AE Q-, j ��VARDIN PL 74.5 p E A+H O ZONELU i 1 w _ AH ir► k:� crr„ , ^� c - - ZONE 7'4- 5 < ['rnrrrl 'AJ7574 = - - AH ,r ' lu z` ri 'ZD• E ZONE AE ZONES 4 � ,-j ,t 2 7 _ �' . r • t. 7 _ C i'--�LEPdA CT E 23 l w ZONE AH Z( • r' r•�, ' 7•' _ ZONE f .' l ► .ti VALENCIA AE F' ? �'•� �} LAKES CIRX. GROVE DR ~ ZONE AEA .� o�E°� 14.5 01 =v Qr ;► i _ r15 •:� BaSo•1� 15 '''+Zd E AE f ZONEI ZONEAE 14.5 y' . r: cr ... 74 5 81 a33'45.00" 26 ° 18'45.00" rvU r U_. ,vrr%r rlrt1_1-% Onvvviv vry r nr� rrn,v UL_ IQ LOCATED WITHIN TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST. DG7324 ZONE AE 291 0000mN ZONE AE ' zs09'vc> N I�IIIRI��Ii�l��l�lkil � . ZONE AE N� LiFl ��.���i��l�l��ll��i�: 2908000a%N 29Q7Doom N AE - 1- - .� ►._ ,� a . - - rn ZONE AE 14.54 x.�. .5 •.•. RANDALL BLVD • ... p -� `tom---74�� - `._�-^--,-�� _ 73 r = „ram F 73.5... :7;4:;5'. '` `74.5 - 14.5 w ZO N E � -� AJ7573 - , �. s `•• iMM ERO•AD' -- �: v �',' y F�►, 14.5 ° ` u) 14.5 Sri �'4 14 .. r o 74 Z N X. . - a 7 --13-5 74 W 3 ••13 rli. �'• .. • • • 24TH AVE NE K �. r • ° ' • • '�: 24TFi'R11E NE" _ .. F 24TH AVE; 14 r _ .- .•F �, • �" :1,•. ..�.. - 1.A � T LLL ;,,� -- - - - - . - •'/- N4�! 1 f � � r-- ZONE - Y? 7%4 I �;.�: r- ,•. 4 i' .r �'u'�'r • r ` 73.5 1: AH 06 IN ir 14 705000 FT 13:5' ,fir t. •r ��'. �` :ZDNE�.• .�: r° * A''•'.:.. i" I 75 _ 15 73 5 74 1:;� �.., 14 •. -r'� - ; -:, 74:5 owl 27 V5. 22ND AVE ai i 1 1 6 ✓'►+r- "�•2N f41/E NE ' •� �- 74-. � ' � 22ND VE"rJE; . 14.5 "�'+ w`v .►;Ak "y,�.. A !u���: k I . k+:' �. ' ;�:: •`'' , Z.• 4�14.5 ZONE AH ZONE AE Z. ... 7 3 d M• ' , W ZONE AE700000 FT- y 13 t 13.5�' 2AL 13 j SHADY LN 13 . C '►r ess Calla! ZONE AH 13 p:% _ 12T-i AV.•I .•' ' 3 ` ••• aA yf ... Y ' 26015'00.00" •.! ZONE,H 81°37'30.00" ZONE AH 43$OOOOmE ZONE AH 74 I ZONE ZONE AH AH 13.5 ZONE All ' AJ7572 > du w 75 tr•��' :-�,•••'•'• 13.5 �;r, v � � {' (lrrr T e , •�r�y _lu �• � � `•� . '� �•• +' � ZONE r-7.3.5, -+t . �' _ H ZONE 73.5j,u'_ 13.5 !>.:f '�►,`. 2NE ---.r. - �, r�� •r ZON •� , -- 4. ,I•. 20TH iOE ► �• ' Y Jr* S #prr:• `14.5 ^�' 4. _ AE r NE '� r, .. E 7 �F4 ut t 13 5 113.5 DG7327' :� 93.5 i - - ::•: 13.5:. - - • - � � �T ;•fill•� '•r• I l' 34 35 r _ - - - Y ze 16T+.H E E� 1 �-� +� ' 1'6TIH AVEr'E- lk of. • - aZQNE ASH'-, 13 • • �� T,Fi• . ,E NEid.� m C rrrrrr! ' 135 13 Ir ter ,.;t ...... ..�1 13 ;r ..- L -12TH11, E k 10 i3 `y 43900 0inE ZONE AH ZONE AH 13 4400DO'-E JOINS PANEL 0430 4410000ME ZONE AH ZONE AH 4420u")mE . 18TH At ©�733$ 73 5 ^j`413.5 JUNG BLl'IDl:[i . 36 ` EiNE• 'Y I ••r!` a 'rt '.I ZonlE 14 AH L'r ZONE AH 4430o00ME 2905Doom N <<04:: On-.N T ZONE AH 26015'00.00" 81 °33'45.00" SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS SFHAS) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the Flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 111/6 annual chance Flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include zones A, AE, AH, A0, AR, A99, V and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE, AE Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AH, AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 Feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Area formerly protected From the 1% annual chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood. ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 111/6 annual chance flood by a Federal flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal Flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE The Floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance Flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees From 1% annual chance flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE x Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which Flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. ® COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS) CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1% annual chance floodplain boundary 0.2% annual chance floodplain boundary Floodway boundary - - Zone D boundary ■�s�sr��aaasss��• CBRS and OPA boundary i Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood Elevations, flood depths or flood velocities. �►•� 513 - Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet* (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation in feet* * Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1938 {NAVD 88) A A Cross section line 23 - - - - - - - 23 Transect line Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American 97=Q7'30".32°22'30" Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) 427500omN 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid value, zone 17 6000000 FT 5000-foot grid value: Florida State Plane coordinate system, east zone (FIPSZONE 0901),Lambert Conformal Conic projection DX5510 Bench mark {see explanation in Notes to Users section of this FIRM panel) M1.5 River Mile MAP REPOSITORY Refer to Map Repositories list on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP November 17, 2005 EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISIONS) TO THIS PANEL May 16 2012 - to update corporate limits to change Base Flood Elevations to add Base Flood Y P P g Elevations, to add Special Flood Hazard Areas, to change Special Flood Hazard Areas, to change zone designations, to update reads and road names, to update the effects of wave action, to reflect revised shoreline, to reflect updated topographic information, and to modify Coastal Barrier Resources Areas and Otherwise Protected Areas. For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, refer to the Community Map history table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1- 800- 638- 6620. ICI MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 FEET METERS 300 0 300 600 ID PANEL 0240H FIRM m m FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COLLIER COUNTY, m FLORIDA m AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 240 OF 1225 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) m m CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX 0 COLLIER COUNTY 120067 0240 H 6 Notice to User The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders-, the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. Aa aEe�� MAP NUMBER 12021 CO240H °qT MAP REVISED � Nn MAY 1612012 m Federal Emergency Managenlcnt Ageney� FU7 GG7 GG6 Lee County Cork3 Cork2 Collier County FU6 3 w U al Y O — U a Corkl GG5 Coco1 Coco2 Coco3 Cocohatchee Canal Coco4 U FUS w 0 Curry 1 0 � AR2 2 n 175W3 CR951 N ' a MILLER3 d� Cypress1 — GG4 m c ¢m a O a c Y a � 175W2 Golden Gate Main Canal a a n a O. T U Q Green Canal C-e cor,r, otor FU4S U AR1 GG1 GG Main I75W1 CR951S GG3 a GG2 BCB BCB I Field Station HC2 W, J Gulf of Mexico Works of the Basin 21 BCB Structures tsCanal Reach Controlled, Operated and Maintained by BCB Canal Reach Maintained by BCB* Canal Overbank Controlled, Operated and m Maintained by Collier County** *Note: Canal Reach Controlled and Operated by Collier County, subject to Limiting Conditions (3rd Amendment to Agreement C-11759, 02109/2012) **Note: Canal Overbank Controlled and Operated by Collier County, subject to Limiting Conditions (3rd Amendment to Agreement C-11759, 02109/2012) (CEF way.,......... �md�ed *areaa�e., mawme wy am .—d P1W pe.banaeceo y�em seonon a'remrekoym ne oin nv m, neereiy ee u.1 eyTm nc�6i P—d.d Ne nsb, —d m, nnioa de—,.- .a..r-... Ana i,bindi, dd— �mb.�.*. ax.a .�m.reaea ro .. �reb e r BIG CYPRESS BASIN SFWMD 2660 Horseshoe Dr. N. Naples, Florida 34104 239-263-7615 M Works of the District S489 ® CERP Pump Stations Manatee Mitigation Area Tieback Levee Spreader Basins CERP Canals Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan MILLER2 .. _ TFU3 a S488� v C-485 S486 $4$7 U MILLERI I FU2 c 0 7 LL FU1 Manatee Qs-489 Mitigation Area N W E o il a Miles S BCB \ SFWMD Facility and Infrastructure Map Mar 2019 Urban Collier County, Florida Canals in South Florida Appendix C: Primary Water Management Features Table C-22. BCB-operated water control structures in the Big Cypress Basin. Type Control Crest Elevation (ft. NGVD) Structure ID Net Length (feet) Function Comments Top of Bank Elevation ft. msl Moveable crest weir with manually operated hydraulic flap gate Flood Control & Salinity he Airport Road Canal (S.) Subbasin empties into GG-1 Crest elev.: Flap Up: +3.35; Control he Main Golden Gate Canal a short distance Flap Down: +2.00 upstream ofthis structure. Igth=112 ft; top of bank: 9.5 ft Fixed crest weir with 2 manually operated Approx. 2 miles upstream ofGG-I near the 1-75 GG-2 bottom opening sluice gates Flood Control & Over- verpass. The 1-75 Canal Subbasin empties into the crest elev.: +5.00 ; sluice gate: -1.00 Jrainage Prevention Main Golden Gate Canal a short distance upstream Igth=105 ft; top of bank: 9.5 ft f this structure. Fixed crest weir with 2 manually operated pprox. 6 miles upstream ofGG-2 at the eastern end GG-3 bottom opening sluice gates Flood Control & Over- f 1 7th Avenue S.W. (within the Golden Gate crest elev.: +7.50; sluice gate: -0.50 rainage Prevention community) Igth=100 ft; top of bank: 13.0 ft Fixed crest weir with 2 manually operated Approx. 8.35 miles upstream of GG-3. Located 250 GG-4 bottom opening sluice gates Flood Control & Over- ft. east and 100 ft. south of the intersection of crest elev: +9.50; sluice gate: +2.50 drainage Prevention Golden Gate Boulevard and 8th Street N.E. in Igth=100 ft; top of bank: 13.0 ft Golden Gate Estates. Fixed crest weir with 2 manually operated pprox. 4 miles upstream of GG-4. Located 500 ft GG-5 bottom opening sluice gates Flood Control & Over- north of the Randall Boulevard Bridge over the crest elev:+10.50; sluice gate :+4.5o Jrainage Prevention Golden Gate Canal in Golden Gate Estates. Igth=95 ft; top of bank: 15.0 ft Non -operable fixed crest weir with Vee-notch Flood Control & Over- Approx. 3.5 miles upstream of GG-5. This structure GG-6 crest elev: +12.10 rainage Prevention is approx. 2.5 downstream of the northerly terminus Igth: 49 ft; top of bank: 18.0 ft f the Main Golden Gate Canal. Concrete sheetpile fixed crest weir with Vee-n Seasonal Water level Located on a side branch of the Main Golden Gate GG-7 otch equipped with flashboards. Control 3anal near the northerly terminus of 2Oth Street crest elev: +13.1 Over -drainage Prevention N.E. off 47x' Avenue N.E.. Igth = 44 ft; top of bank: 16.3 ft (design flood elev.) Fixed crest weir with 2 manually operated Flood Control & Over-d Located upstream of GG-3, at the north end of 25th Cypress-i bottom opening sluice gates rainage Street N.W. from the intersection of Golden Gate crest elev.: +9.50; sluice gate: +2.50 Prevention Estates. Igth: 42 ft; top of bank: 10.0 ft Fixed crest weir w/roller gate and back 1-75-1 pumping facilities Flood Control & Over- drainage Located at 1-75 Canal Outfall to Main Golden Gate Crest elev.: +6.20 gate: +1 .00 Prevention anal System. Igth: 96 ft; top of bank: 10.0 ft Water elevation gauging station (fixed I-75-2 concrete weir immediately upstream) Data Collection 1-75 Canal at Pine Ridge Road weir crest elev. += 8.00 Igth=71.5; top of bank: (unknown) Fixed crest weir with one bottom opening and one top opening sluice gate - manually Flood Control & Over- 1-75-3 operated Approximately 2 miles downstream of the northern crest: +i1.00 rainage Prevention terminus of the 1-75 Canal. top gate: +10.00; bottom gate: +1.5 Igth: 23 ft; top of bank: 9.0 ft Amil gate with back pumping capabilities Discharge Elev: +7.50 msl Flood Control & Over Located on Airport -Pulling Road approximately 2000 CR-31 S wet season +8.50 msl irainage ft north of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) dry season Invert: -2.3' msl Prevention Size: D-710; top of bank: 10.4 ft Amil gate with back pumping capabilities Discharge Elev: +7.50 msl Flood Control & Over- Located on Airport -Pulling Road approx. one mile CR-31 N wet season +8.50 msl drainage south ofGolden Gate Parkway (CR 886) dry season Invert: +2.0' msl Prevention . Size: D-500; top of bank: 10.2 ft Fixed crest weir with manually HEN-1 operated slide gates (2) and one sluice gate Salinity and Flood Control North side of US-41 approx. 2000' east of County crest: +5.00; slide gates: +3.5 msl; & Over -drainage Prevention Road 951 sluice gate: +0.5 msl; top of bank: 7.0 ft Adjustable crest weir (stoplog) Flood Control & Over- pprox. 1 V miles west of the easterly end of Stewart MERRITT-1 crest range: -4.9 to+9.0 drainage Blvd. in Golden Gate Estates Igth: 25 ft; top of bank: 8.5 ft Prevention Fixed crest weir with manually Flood Control & West end of98th Avenue SE from intersection of MILLER-1 operated flashboards Overdrainage Everglades Blvd in Golden Gate Estates, Six crest: +3.90 Prevention miles downstream of MILLER-2 Igth: 68 ft; top of bank: 9.5 ft C-65 Big Cypress Basin: Simulated 25-Year/5-Day Stage Hydrographs Kc4 A-"s 6w1 W& NOW All stacie ciata in NAvLj Iftaq NAVU Stage Hydrograph for S-Day 25-Year Storm wrier t-1 M PFCSS N 7W. 00 11.2 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - .. ... ... .. .. ... .. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - T - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 7- L.. .... .... - - - - - - - - r ao--- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - k - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I j -4 - -T, T. . . .... .. . .... - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1-a- 58.199s r-&Igwj sa6-l9g8 I 14.iggs CVDress around 31ll St. NW jwj Siege Fydrgraph for fi-bay 25-Year Storm W.Ior L.va- CYPFM5'XAN 4" 00 120-- . .... . . ... .... . . .... . ... ... ... .... ... . . - - - . . ... ... . .. ... ... ... .... ... - - - - - - - I L 10.6- - ... ... ... .... .... - - - . . ... ... ... ... ... ... . .... . ... .... - I. . . ... ... ... ... J fryaF 41 . .... ... 8.6 ............ L& -17 p Z W c yA 175t'S't. NW ssaU - 1 - Irs�] Novo Stage Ridrograph for 5-Day 25-Year Storm around I 61h St of C)Eress Can nal I it 11.4 ... . . .... . . ... --4 . . . . ....... ... ... - - - -i . .. .... . .. .... ...... ....... ... ... . . .... . . .... . . ... - - - - -- - - - . . . . ... ... . .... ... .... . .. .... ... ... .. ... . . ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... . . . .. ... . . ... ... ... ... ... ... 4- - - - - __.________a________ .. .... ... .... .. .. . ... ... - - - - - - - . . ....... ... ... ... I. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1-4 -------- -------- 7 -------- ----- -- 1. V ". (Dress dround 6'St. NW - GY PP� N 2&22 00 3,; Stage NyOrograph For 5-Day 25-Year Storm at Cu" Canal VV.%rL.-I I I . - CU%RYCAN 2409.00 124-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12.21 . . . ... ... ... . . . .. ... ... ... ... ... . r - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1j)4: ------------------------------- ------ - -------- r -------- W------- K- L- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . .. . ... .. . . .. .... - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - ,-B(Y 3-a-1996 6 "'M, "r,A 84. '"M ks Sto Curry Canal -2- \� AVON 101 D-L)UY 25-year Strom ------------ --- F - - - 7 7 I . - - - L 1, I T -- - - - - - - - - - - - ---, - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - ... ... ... --- - - - II ... ... .... . .... ... ... . t ----------I - - - :— I - - - - - - - - - - - ----------- I ... .... ... .... Y—L" - ccw-,ZAMNlC4N &II&W .14 "M 00;00 00 Mwoo WD000 M90AW DU:W:W WWV D(;:QO.W OD"M W;W:W 00:00W =0000 00:00:W DOMM Wolf _ r I 1-9m 2A-'D 7-0-I"s 4-6.1"s 15-0-ir5 C-4-1009 7-3.1w SA-im 0-6.19" 10-0-IM 11-9-sm 12-9-lim sst-Im Q( 10 3N �rs Cork Screw Canal :r..a -AID - ii--------- : \Lqi — IPA— -, Stage Hyd"raph for &Day MYear Sichrm V" L-1 OPAN(F: IIII I-M r t - - - - - - - - - - - - L L - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------------- T- - - 7 r - - - - - - - - T - - --- - - - - - - - - T -------- -------- -------- T I I I I . I L--- ---------------------------- L--- ... ... ... ... I ... ... ... .... I . ... ... ... OM00 DOoO.11] �M MMW MW.M.M 9PAPm W.M.m wm-w wm:w mm-m WMAP M-00-W GOMM DOMW 1-U I �T V-IQM O�61)M 74-1M 8-6-1995 VI&IM 104-TM W&IM 12-8-IMS 134-IM 14-&lm I Orange Canal -3- 2l9. rrm,.g-p. ., ..y ,,'}Ted! WOrm 2.4-- - L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L --- I.E - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y. . . . ... .. .... ... ... - - - - - - - - - 4 • L alL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _I- - - - - - - - --- - - - I - - - - - - - L - - - I - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ... . . ... .. . ... ... ... - DDOoW. 4o oo:Do:..o G 'q .6 6— 4pg o �;k ic' rfl 01 a gc gcnvrapn jar .Tuay 4D. Year z4orm . . . . .... ... .... .... - 7 I. T. r .. ... ... ... -4 - - - - -- IIA, - . ..... .. IL2- . . .. ... ... . ... ... ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - L I T - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --. :- - - -.. - - -.. - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.6-- r - - - - r - - - - --- - - - - -7 12T) IA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0/11,X Fa Union Canal M!, W— — - OQUENrATUAN 10 m,w t r-S gym, L� - FAKhlliChG�N 101M.06 i 4 ?4b hrg IFee1] nAvnlitSlage F*drograph for 5-Day 25-Year Storm at Upstream CY#1 W.Mr Level CYPHEsscAN oM.W - �. I I I I , I = r I l [ I I I 1 I I 1 1 9.8 �y _ J I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I M 996 7-H 1975 9-&1M 11$,49G 17.8-, 995 ,�V `� 4J I �' 1 Ui)stream CY#1 -go rryp q_pIOr .7,-udY C.']-i Cdr al 4P rl a wYi rL' 1 ui LaliR4 2 I I ,.9 _ _ _ _ _ . _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I_ _ _ _ _ _ r T _ - _ _ _ - _ Y - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I • I I I I I I I , I _ I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.- - - - -'- - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - . - - . - . - - - - - . - . - . - - Water Level —GOLDBK;A TEMAN 15824 OD 1-B•1985 M-1995 54-1 RN i-&, 986 &&f995 F,-�1995 13-&.1995 153109' D Jews ALP Upstream GG#4 -5- 1.&1995 1-6-1905 5-e. 13]5 7.R 1,q!, p-Pm 114-1903 IM.1§®5 1 Upstream Miller#3 - I&LHN.RN * 00 m ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICANT'S HANDBOOK VOLUME II Effective: MAY 22, 2016 FIGURE - , -DAB' RAINFALL: 5-YE R RETURN PERIOD 11/15/21, 1:31 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 9, Version 2 V"� Location name: Naples, Florida, USA* Latitude: 26.253*, Longitude:-81.607* Elevation: 13.23 ft** source: ESRI Maps ** source: USGS""`" POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials PF tabular PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Average recurrence interval (years) Duration ������1 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 0.572 T 0.643 F 0.763 0.866 F 1.01 F 1.25 1.37 1.54 1.68 5-min (0.462-0.712) (0.519-0.802) (0.613-0.956) (0.691-1.09) (0.779-1.33) (0.845-1.51) (0.897-1.73) (0.940-1.97) (1.01-2.30) (1.06-2.55) 0.837 0.942 1.12 1.27 1.48 1.65 1.83 2.01 2.26 2.46 10-min (0.676-1.04) 11 (0.759-1.18) (0.898-1.40) (1.01-1.60) (1.14-1.95) 1 (1.24-2.22) 1 (1.31-2.53) 1 (1.38-2.89) (1.48-3.37) (1.56-3.73) 1.02 1.15 1.36 1.55 1.81 2.02 2.23 2.45 2.76 3.00 15-min (0.824-1.27) 1 (0.926-1.43) (1.10-1.71) (1.23-1.95) (1.39-2.38) 1 (1.51-2.70) (1.60-3.09) (1.68-3.52) (1.80-4.11) (1.90-4.55) 1.57 1.77 2.09 2.38 2.79 3.11 3.45 3.81 4.30 4.68 30-min (1.27-1.96)1 (1.42-2.20) (1.68-2.62) (1.90-3.00) (2.14-3.67) (2.33 4.18) (2.48-4.79) (2.61-5.48) (2.81-6.41) (2.96-7.11) 2.07 2.32 2.76 3.14 3.68 4.12 4.57 5.05 5.70 6.22 60-min (1 .67-2.57) (1.87-2.90) (2.22-3.45) (2.50-3.95) (2.83-4.85) (3.08-5.53) (3.29-6.34) (3.45-7.26) (3.73-8.50) ( 3.94-9.45) 2.56 2.88 3.42 3.89 4.57 5.12 5.69 6.29 7.11 7.76 2-hr (2.08-3.17) (2.33-3.57) (2.76-4.25) (3.12-4.87) (3.54-5.98) (3.86-6.83) (4.12-7.84 4.34-8.98) (4.70-10.5) (4.96-11.7 ) ) ( 2.78 3.15 3.77 4.31 5.09 5.72 6.37 7.05 8.00 8.74 3-hr (2.27-3.43)1 (2.56-3.88) 1 (3.05-4.67) 1 (3.47-5.37) (3.96-6.64) (4.32-7.59) (4.63-8.74) (4.89-10.0) (5.31-11.8) (5.63-13.1) 3.12 3.60 4.42 5.14 6.17 7.01 7.88 8.79 10.1 11.0 6-hr 2 (2.94-4.41) (3.60-5.44) (4.16-6.36) (4.83-8.01) (5.34-9.26) (5.77-10.7) (6.15-12.4) ( 6.74-14.7) (7.18-16.5) 3.44 4.08 5.19 6.15 7.55 8.69 9.88 11.1 12.9 14.3 12-hr (2.83-4.18) 1 (3.35-4.97) (4.24-6.33) (5.00-7.55) (5.95-9.76) 1 (6.66-11.4) (7.30-13.4) (7.87-15.7) (8.72-18.8) (9.37-21.1) 3.94 4.67 5.96 7.12 8.84 10.3 11.8 13.4 15.7 17.5 24-h r (3.25-4.75) (3.85-5.64) (4.90-7.23) (5.82-8.68) (7.03-11.4) (7.94-13.4) (8.78-15.9) (9.56-18.8) (10.7-22.7) (11.6-25.8) 4.72 5.47 6.82 8.06 9.95 11.6 13.3 15.2 17.9 20.0 2-day (3.92-5.65) (4.53-6.55) (5.63-8.20) (6.62-9.75) (7.98-12.8) (9.02-15.1) ( 10.0-17.9) ( 10.9-21.2) ( 12.4-25.8) ( 13.4-29.3) 5.24 6.09 7.59 8.95 11.0 12.7 14.5 16.5 19.2 21.5 3-day (4.36-6.25) 1 (5.06-7.27) 1 (6.29-9.09) (7.38-10.8) (8.83-14.0) 1 (11.0-19.4) (11.9-22.8) (13.4-27.6) (14.5-31.3) 5.70 6.63 8.24 9.68 11.8 13.6 15.4 17.4 20.2 22.4 4-day (4.76-6.78) (5.52-7.89) (6.84-9.84) 1 (7.99-11.6) (9.49-15.0) (10.6-17.5) 1 (11.7-20.5) (12.6-24.0) (14.1-28.8) (15.2-32.5) 7.06 8.03 9.71 11.2 13.3 15.1 16.9 18.9 21.6 23.7 7-day (5.91-8.34) (6.72-9.50) (8.10-11.5) 1 (9.28-13.4) (10.8-16.7) (11.9-19.3) (12.9-22.3) (13.8-25.8) (15.2-30.6) (16.2-34.2) 8.38 9.37 11.1 12.5 14.6 16.3 18.1 20.0 22.6 24.6 10-day (7.04-9.86) (7.86-11.0) (9.24-13.1) (10.4-14.9 ( 11.8-18.2) (12.9-20.7) (13.8-23.8) (14.7-27.2) (16.0-31.8) (16.9-35.4) ) 12.3 13.4 15.3 16.8 18.9 20.6 22.2 23.8 25.9 27.5 20-day (10.3-14.3)1 (11.3-15.7) 1 (12.8-17.9) (14.1-19.9) (15.3-23.2) (16.3-25.7) (17.0-28.7) (17.6-31.9) (18.5-36.1) (19.2-39.3) 15.3 16.7 18.9 20.7 23.0 24.6 26.2 27.7 29.6 30.9 30-day (13 0-17.8)1 (14.2-19.5) 1 (16.0-22.1) (17.4-24.3) (18.6-27.9) (19.6-30.5) (20.2-33.6) (20.6-36.9) (21.2-40.9) (21.7-43.9) 19.0 20.9 23.7 25.8 28.5 30.3 32.0 33.4 35.1 36.2 45-day (16.2-22.0) (17.7-24.2) (20.0-27.5) (21.7-30.2) (23.1-34.2) (24.1-37.2) (24.7-40.6) (24.9-44.1) (25.2-48.1) ( 25.5-51.2) 33.4 35.4 37.3 38.8 40.4 41.3 60-day E;�QF-24.-3-�F-27-.7-�F-30-.3-7F (20.7-28.1) J L(23.5-32.1) (25.5-35.3) (27.1-39.9) (28.3-43.3) (28.8-47.1) (28.9-50.9) (29.1-55.1) (29.3-58.3) Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top PF graphical https:Hhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_Printpage.html?lat=26.2530&Ion=-81.607O&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 1/4 11/15/21, 1:31 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server PDS-based depth -duration -frequency {DDF) curves Latitude: 26.2530 Longitude:-81.60701 4� 40 35 C 30 a a 25 O 20 Q u 15 ai CL o. 10 5 a Oppe N A r-I N f+'1 - O O O Ln O 1-1 r-I rn rl N rn V �Q Duration 45 40 35 c t30 n -6 25 0 ++ 20 4T 'CL 15 EL EL 10 --- ..... ............... ........... ...-.....-- ...-- .---. -- ---- — ...---.� 0 = — 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Average recurrence interval (years) NDAA Atlas 14, Volume 9, Version 2 Created {GMT: Mon Nov 15 18:31-00 2021 Back to Top Maps & aerials Small scale terrain Average recurrence interval (years) — 1 2 — 5 — 1Q 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Duration — 5-min — 2-day — t0-mm — 3-day 15-min --- 4-Qay — 30--min — 7Aay — 60-min — 10-day — 2fir — 20-aay — 3fir — 30-0ay — 6-nr — 45-day — 12-hr — 60-day — x4a,r https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds—printpage.html?lat=26.2530&Ion=-81.6070&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 2/4 11/15/21, 1:31 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server �f _dil Well Rd ! .V Bonita Bay Eat yZsy ' mmoka'.re A. _ I I w 3km 2mi Large scale terrain 7LORIDA Port 5 aitlt Luca �.1 rid WestPalrr Cape Cor'a IBoca Raton* jCoral Springs e ' Pompano E :Mijmi'� + y m 100knn �a 'r � 60mi �} Large scale map PcprtStLurie West Palm c ape Goes[ Beach ' I Coral Springs �ccaRaton ■� PompanoB Mia b 100km 60mi Large scale aerial https:Hhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=26.2530&Ion=-81.607O&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 3/4 11/15/21, 1:31 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server Back to Top US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service National Water Center 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Questions?: HDSC.Questions@noaa.gov Disclaimer https:Hhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=26.2530&Ion=-81.607O&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 4/4 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37280440000 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer THACKSTON, GLENDA SUE 196 RIVERWOOD RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES State 1 FL Zipi 34114 MFap No. Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 330100 6 04CO3 1 3 49 27 2.81 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 N 180FT OF TR 6 OR 1207 PG 67 1 Millage Area s 87 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 10/06/05 ook-Pa a 3905-3611 WAmount $ 0 07/02/03 3331-1196 $ 54,500 07/01/86 1207-67 $ 0 04/01/74 585-1081 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 60,064 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 60,064 (-) 10% Cap $ 38,139 (_) Assessed Value $ 21,925 (_) School Taxable Value $ 60,064 (_) Taxable Value $ 21,925 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37280480002 Address Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer Name / Address I GOULAIT, CATHERINE ANN 5175 THANE RD JUNEAU Stat AK Zip 99801-7716 MFap No. Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 330100 6 14CO3 1 3 49 27 2.34 F- Lega GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 S 150FT OF TR 6 Millage Area la 187 Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 Use Code a 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) 7 ook-Pa a Amount 03/06/08 06/06/64336-1679 $ 0 8 277-783 $ 0 Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 1 6.5335 1 11.4225 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 50,018 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 50,018 (-) 10% Cap $ 33,166 (_) Assessed Value $ 16,852 (_) School Taxable Value $ 50,018 (_) Taxable Value $ 16,852 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 314 Site Zone Parcel No 37280560003 Address WILSON Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer 1 BLVD N Name / Addr TERRA HOME BUILDERS INC 4420 18TH ST NE M Cites NAPLES I State I FL I Zip134120 lap No. Stra N Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 330100 7 14CO3 3 49 27 2.81 Leg GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 S 180FT OF TR 7 Millage Area O 87 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations _ Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total _ Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History (lint all Salac ara lictarl Am to Cnnfirlantialitvl DateW Book -Page IWAmoun 12/28/20 5877-1622 $ 107,000 10/09/01 2905-1213 $ 0 04/11/96 2169-1757 $ 0 02/09/96 2147-1585 $ 0 03/04/94 1920-609 $ 0 02/01/86 1179-2368 $ 8,000 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 80,085 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 80,085 (_) Assessed Value $ 80,085 (_) School Taxable Value $ 80,085 (_) Taxable Value $ 80,085 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37280760007 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer BOTET, DAYLAR BELKIS BOTET BELKIS PICHARDO 8235 IVIS CLUB DR AT 302 Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES State Fl- I Zipi 34104 MFap No. ]111Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 330100 10 04CO3 1 3 49 27 1.64 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 N 105FT OF TR 10 OR 1015 PG 1342 Millage Area s 87 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 7 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 08/02/21 ook-Pa a 5995-2830 W Amoun $ 135,000 06/16/21 5969-3415 $ 70,000 04/01 /83 1015-1342 $ 6,100 12/01/81 1 948-1712 $ 4,700 10/01 /80 1 887-1448 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 46,740 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 46,740 (-) 10% Cap $ 27,054 (_) Assessed Value $ 19,686 (_) School Taxable Value $ 46,740 (_) Taxable Value $ 19,686 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37280800006 Address Name / Address I City *Disclaimer THUMAN, ERWIN GUILLERMO DANY ELIZABETH THUMAN 470 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State 1 FL Zipi 34120 Map No. ]111Strap No-jlff� Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 3301001014CO3 1 3 49 27 1.17 Lega GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 S 75FT OF N 180FT OF TR 10 OR 919 PG 1274 Millage Area s 87 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 07/28/21 ook-Pa a 5995-3526 WAmoun $ 107,500 06/16/21 5969-3415 $ 70,000 05/01/81 919-1274 1 $ 2,700 11/01/74 1 605-1975 1 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value IM $ 33,345 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 33,345 (-) 10% Cap $ 19,300 (_) Assessed Value $ 14,045 (_) School Taxable Value $ 33,345 (_) Taxable Value $ 14,045 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 496 Site Zone Parcel No 37280920009 Address WILSON Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer 1 BLVD N Name / AddrilWALTI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC 3780 29TH AVE SW M Cites NAPLES I State I FL I Zip134117 lap No. Stra N Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 3301001104CO3 3 49 27 2.81 Leg GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 S 180FT OF TR 11 Millage Area O 87 Millage Rates v *Calculations _ Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total _ Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) �ateW Book -Page WAmoun 05/06/20 5763-2493 $ 0 02/23/10 4543-74 $ 0 07/16/02 3073-860 $ 64,500 04/13/00 2663-947 $ 25,000 07/23/98 2443-3486 $ 0 04/19/94 1 1936-1626 1 $ 14,500 04/01/88 1 1343-484 1 $ 10,500 01/01/83 1 1003-1560 1 $ 8,700 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 80,085 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 80,085 (-) 10% Cap $ 46,352 (_) Assessed Value $ 33,733 (_) School Taxable Value $ 80,085 Taxable Value $ 33,733 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 720 Parcel No 37281280007 Address WILSON Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer BLVD N Name / AddrVPADAVATHIL, JACOB THOMAS AS A PADAVATHIL 5200 LANCELOT LN Site Zone 34120 *Note M Cites DAVIE I State I FL I Zip133331-3371 lap No. Stra N Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 330100 16 4CO3 3 49 27 5.15 Leg GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 TR 16 OR 1445 PG 31 Millage Area O 87 Millage Rates v *Calculations _ Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total _ Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) DateW Book -Page IWAmoun 11/05/04 3674-1188 $ 230,000 05/31/89 1445-31 $ 0 03/01/87 1 1257-914 1 $ 55,000 11/01/85 1163-481 $ 0 05/01/84 1083-824 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Chanae) Land Value $ 110,081 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 110,081 (-) 10% Cap $ 69,897 (_) Assessed Value $ 40,184 (_) School Taxable Value $ 110,081 Taxable Value J1$ 40,184 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37281320006 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer RAMOS, MARITZA 811 2ND ST NE Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES State 1 FL Zipi 34120 MFap No. ]111Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 330100 17 04CO3 1 3 49 27 2.58 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 N 1/2 OF TR 17 Millage Area s 87 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 03/05/18 ook-Pa a 5483-25 WAmount $ 0 01/11/00 2629-3498 $ 0 11/23/99 2614-259 $ 0 04/01 /79 806-1092 $ 0 09/01/68 284-835 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 73,530 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 73,530 (-) 10% Cap $ 1,301 (_) Assessed Value $ 72,229 (_) School Taxable Value $ 73,530 (_) Taxable Value $ 72,229 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37281400007 Address Name / Address 4 City *Disclaimer SPERLING JT REVOCABLE TRUST 24440 WOODSAGE DR BONITA SPRINGS Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State'FL Zipi 34134 Map No. ]111Strap NoJW Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4CO3 330100 19 04CO3 1 3 49 27 5.6 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 TR 19 OR 914 PG 1198 1 Millage Area s 87 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 330100 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 14 School Other Total Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 T 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 10/24/14 ook- 5097-1571 Amount $ 0 10/25/04 3666-2308 $ 287,500 05/05/04 3555-3669 $ 140,000 04/25/81 914-1198 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 125,215 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 125,215 (-) 10% Cap $ 72,397 (_) Assessed Value $ 52,818 (_) School Taxable Value $ 125,215 (_) Taxable Value $ 52,818 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37118720009 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer BRODIE, MARSHALL E 15721 SW 76 AVE Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES State 1 FL Zip 33157 MFap No. ]111Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4C04 328600 132 04C04 1 4 49 27 2.58 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 11 N1/2 OF TRACT 132 Millage Area s 87 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 328600 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 11 School Other Total Use Code e 0 -VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 11/18/98 ook- 2482-213 Amount $ 0 04/14/95 2049-42 $ 0 04/13/95 2049-40 $ 37,000 06/01/73 547-41 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value IM $ 90,300 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 90,300 (-) 10% Cap $ 29,739 (_) Assessed Value $ 60,561 (_) School Taxable Value $ 90,300 (_) Taxable Value $ 60,561 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37118720106 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer BRODIE, MARSHALL E 15721 SW 76 AVE PALMETTO BAY Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State'FL Zip 33157 Map No. Strap NojW Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4C04 32860013214C04 1 4 49 27 2.58 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 11 S1/2 OF TRACT 132 Millage Area s 87 Millage Rates o *Calculations Sub./Condo 328600 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 11 School Other Total Use Code e 0 -VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.5335 11.4225 Latest Sales History 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Sub'ect to Chan e) Date ook-Pa a Amount Land Value $ 90,300 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 90,300 (-) 10% Cap $ 29,739 (_) Assessed Value $ 60,561 (_) School Taxable Value $ 90,300 (_) Taxable Value $ 60,561 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37492000005 Address I Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 Name / Add *Disclaimer VILLAFRANCA, ARNALDO=& BARBARA 6930 SW 178TH AVE SOUTHWEST RANCHE Map No. Strap No].W Section 3C34 ]IIIW331300 24 3C34 1 34 State'FL Township 48 Zip 33331-1823 Range Acres *Estimated 27 5 LegaT GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 TR 24 1 Millage Area la 1290 1 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 1331300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 1 School Other Total Use Code a 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) ook-Pa a Amoun 07/31/95 1 2084-27 1 $ 27,000 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 142,500 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 142,500 (-) 10% Cap $ 77,119 (_) Assessed Value $ 65,381 (_) School Taxable Value $ 142,500 (_) Taxable Value $ 65,381 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37549720005 Address Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer Name / Add VENTI, CAROL LOUISE PO BOX 20512 KEIZER Stat OR I Zip 97307 Map No. Strap Nojnff� Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C33 331600 136 3C33 1 33 48 27 5.15 F— Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 19 TR 136 Millage Area la 1290 1 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 1331600 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 19 1 School Other Total Use Code a 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) loj=ook- Amobd 01/12/83 1003-463 $ 14,000 02/01 /77 1 678-1134 $ 0 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 146,775 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 146,775 (-) 10% Cap $ 76,122 (_) Assessed Value $ 70,653 (_) School Taxable Value $ 146,775 (_) Taxable Value $ 70,653 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37492200009 Address Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer Name / Address SUNSHINE WAY INVESTMENTS LLC 1249 PARK AVE #17C NEW YORK Stat NY I Zip 10029 Map No. Strap Nojnff� Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C34 ]1111331300 28 03C34 1 34 48 27 2.73 F— Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 E 18OFT OF TR 28 Millage Area la 1290 1 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 1331300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 1 School Other Total Use Code a 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) ook- Amount 07/30/16 5321-967 $ 0 06/11/10 4579-1619 $ 0 03/09/10 4544-912 $ 10,500 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 77,805 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 77,805 (-) 10% Cap $ 42,108 (_) Assessed Value $ 35,697 (_) School Taxable Value $ 77,805 (_) Taxable Value $ 35,697 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37492240001 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer JORDANELL CAPITAL LLC 19111 COLLINS AVE APT 801 SUNNY ISLES BEAC Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State'FL Zipi 33160-2379 Map No. Strap No].W Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C34 ]IIW331300 28 13C34 1 34 48 27 2.27 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 W 150FT OF TR 28 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 331300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 11/02/10 ook-Pa a 4619-2422 WAmoun $ 6,700 06/25/87 1273-423 $ 0 04/01/86 1190-574 1 $ 0 05/01 /82 1 971-1784 1 $ 0 Millage Rates a *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 64,695 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 64,695 (-) 10% Cap $ 35,013 (_) Assessed Value $ 29,682 (_) School Taxable Value $ 64,695 (_) Taxable Value $ 29,682 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37492560008 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer BENDER TR, DORIS L 66TH STREET SW UTD 10/23/97 2660 66TH STREET SW Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES State Fl- I Zip 34105 Map No. Strap No Section Township Range 3C34 331300 32 3C34 1 34 48 27 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 TR 32 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 331300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 11/26/97 ook-Pa a 2366-2338 WAmount $ 0 09/01 /89 1468-147 $ 0 06/01/89 1448-291 1 $ 22,000 07/01 /86 1208-434 1 $ 0 Acres *Estimated 5 Millage Rates a *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 142,500 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 142,500 (-) 10% Cap Ji $ 77,119 (_) Assessed Value $ 65,381 (_) School Taxable Value $ 142,500 (_) Taxable Value $ 65,381 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37493440004 Address Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer Name / Address 0 CAPITAL HOMES INVEST & ALL LLC A 3211 10TH AVE NE NAPLES State 1 FL Zip 34120 Map No. ]111Strap Nojnff� Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C34 331300 47 03C34 1 34 48 27 2.27 F— Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 W 150FT OF TR 47 Millage Area la 1290 1 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 1331300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 1 School Other Total Use Code a 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) ook- Amoun 06/15/21 5971-1314 $ 210,000 09/23/93 1 1867-2401 $ 6,500 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 64,695 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 64,695 (-) 10% Cap $ 32,004 (_) Assessed Value $ 32,691 (_) School Taxable Value $ 64,695 (_) Taxable Value $ 32,691 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37493440101 Address Site City *Note *Disclaimer Name / Address 0 CAPITAL HOMES INVEST & ALL LLC A 3211 10TH AVE NE NAPLES State 1 FL Zip 34120 MFap No. ]111Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C34 331300 47 13C34 1 34 48 27 2.73 F— Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UINT 18 E 18OFT OF TR 47 Millage Area la 1290 1 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 1331300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 18 1 School Other Total Use Code a 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) ook- Amoun 06/15/21 5971-1314 $ 210,000 09/23/93 1 1867-2401 $ 6,500 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 64,980 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 64,980 (-) 10% Cap $ 32,289 (_) Assessed Value $ 32,691 (_) School Taxable Value $ 64,980 (_) Taxable Value $ 32,691 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37598680002 Address Name / Address 4 City *Disclaimer STEWART, RONALD 208 FITCHBURG ST SW PALM BAY Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State 1 FL Zipi 32908-1301 Map No. Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 331900 131 03C27 1 27 48 27 2.81 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 S 180FT OF TR 131 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 331900 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 08/07/10 ook- 4611-902 Amount $ 0 02/20/03 3223-1701 $ 0 03/15/96 2159-1156 $ 0 03/01/92 1696-1913 $ 22,000 10/01/87 1302-2278 $ 11,000 05/01/76 1 651-1292 $ 0 Millage Rates a *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 80,085 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 80,085 (-) 10% Cap $ 41,535 (_) Assessed Value $ 38,550 (_) School Taxable Value $ 80,085 (_) Taxable Value $ 38,550 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 2045 Parcel No 37598720001 Address WILSON Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer 1 BLVD N Site Zone 34120 *Note lap No. Stra N Section To ip Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 331900 131 13C27 27 48 27 2.34 L GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 N 150FT OF TR 131 Millage Area O 290 Millage Rates v *Calculations _ Sub./Condo 331900 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 8.7835 i 13.6725 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) �ateW Book -Page WAmoun 08/26/13 4962-1119 $ 0 09/26/97 2350-859 $ 30,000 08/01/81 1 934-55 $ 6,000 08/01/81 1 934-46 $ 0 06/01/69 1 313-387 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 66,690 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 66,690 (-) 10% Cap $ 35,578 (_) Assessed Value $ 31,112 (_) School Taxable Value $ 66,690 Taxable Value $ 31,112 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37740280001 Address Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer Name / Add LESTER, ELOISE C 4412 E FAIRFIELD ST MESA State 1 AZ Zip 85205-5201 MFap No. Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 3 13C27 1 27 48 27 2.81 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 S 180FT OF TR 3 OR 663 PG 761 1 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 Latest Sales History 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Sub'ect to Chan e) ook- Amount Land Value $ 80,085 09/01/76 663-761 $ 0 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 80,085 (-) 10% Cap $ 43,339 (_) Assessed Value $ 36,746 (_) School Taxable Value $ 80,085 (_) Taxable Value $ 36,746 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37742280009 Address Name / Address City *Disclaimer PHAM ET AL, THANH 578 98TH AVE N Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES I State 1 FL Zipi 34108-2220 MFap No. ]111Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 28 13C27 1 27 48 27 2.73 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E 18OFT OF TR 28 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiali ook- Amount 01/26/99 2505-3242 $ 0 11/23/98 2483-2149 $ 0 05/15/98 2420-1465 1 $ 0 02/02/96 2145-618 1 $ 0 Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 77,805 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 77,805 (-) 10% Cap $ 42,108 (_) Assessed Value $ 35,697 (_) School Taxable Value $ 77,805 (_) Taxable Value $ 35,697 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 221 18TH Parcel No 37743480002 Address Name / Address City *Disclaimer AVE NE CUNNINGHAM, EMRON=& STACEY 2430 8TH ST NE Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES I State 1 FL Zipi 34120 MFap No. ]111Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 43 13C27 1 27 48 27 2.73 Legall GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W 180FT OF TR 43 OR Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Net all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl Date ook-j Amoun 10/14/14 5086-2710 $ 48,000 04/04/02 3012-749 $ 42,000 05/16/97 2313-3222 $ 15,000 01/26/93 1791-935 $ 14,000 03/01/88 1338-1836 $ 9,000 Millage Rates a *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 77,805 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 77,805 (-) 10% Cap $ 19,304 (_) Assessed Value $ 58,501 (_) School Taxable Value $ 77,805 (_) Taxable Value $ 58,501 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37598400004 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer TOSCANO, ALBA MELISSA PEREZ A 27551 SHRIVER AVE BONITS SPRINGS Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State'FL Zip 34135 Map No. ]11Strap NojW Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 331900 128 13C27 1 27 48 27 2.81 F— Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 N 180FT OF TR 128 OR 279 PG 637 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 331900 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 Latest Sales History 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality)Sub'ect to Chan e) ook-Pa Arnow Land Value $ 80,085 03/04/21 5906-36 $ 76,000 (+) Improved Value $ 0 70�8/24/04 3630-1806 $ 0 Market Value $ 80,085 (-) 10% Cap $ 41,535 (_) Assessed Value $ 38,550 (_) School Taxable Value $ 80,085 (_) Taxable Value $ 38,550 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37598480008 Address Name / Add *Disclaimer FERNANDEZ, ARNOLDO BOU SANDRA CUESTA TENENBAUM 250 GRAND CANAL DR Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note MIAMI State 1 FL Zipi 33144 MFap No. Strap No Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 331900 129 03C27 1 27 48 27 2.81 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 S 180FT OF TR 129 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 331900 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 04/21/17 ook- 5390-2844 Arno $ 65,000 02/10/17 5364-1186 $ 0 04/15/94 1936-616 $ 15,500 02/24/94 1917-276 $ 0 10/01/90 1564-717 $ 12,000 08/01 /89 1 1461-1961 1 $ 6,600 Millage Rates a *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 68,072 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 68,072 (-) 10% Cap $ 18,983 (_) Assessed Value $ 49,089 (_) School Taxable Value $ 68,072 (_) Taxable Value j& $ 49,089 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 2082 Parcel No 37740760000 Address WILSON Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer BLVD N Site Zone 34120 *Note lap No. Strap NoM I Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 8 13C27 1 27 48 27 2.81 Leg GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 N 180FT OF TR 8 Millage Area O 290 Millage Rates v *Calculations _ Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 8.7835 i 13.6725 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) ate 08/06/21 ook- 6005-2067 Amoun $ 120,000 03/28/00 2656-268 $ 0 03/28/00 2656-267 $ 0 03/29/99 2528-1108 $ 0 03/25/97 2298-835 $ 0 05/01/79 812-259 $ 0 05/01/79 812-255 $ 0 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 80,085 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 80,085 (-) 10% Cap $ 43,339 (_) Assessed Value $ 36,746 (_) School Taxable Value $ 80,085 Taxable Value IW& $ 36,746 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37740840001 Address Name / Address City *Disclaimer D AMATO, LINDA B DALE LENNER EST AMY LUTTERS 7234 E OAKRIDGE CIR LANTANA Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State 1 FL Zipj 33462 Map No. Strap No. jK Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 9 13C27 1 27 48 27 1 2.81 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 S 180FT OF TR 9 OR 848 PG 1465 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 Latest Sales History 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Sub'ect to Chan e) ook-Pa a Amount Land Value $ 68,072 12/01/79 848-1465 $ 0 (+) Improved Value $ 0 08/01/68 284-14 $ 6,200 Market Value $ 68,072 (-) 10% Cap $ 44,189 (_) Assessed Value $ 23,883 (_) School Taxable Value $ 68,072 (_) Taxable Value $ 23,883 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37741440002 Address Name / Address City *Disclaimer L AND C DIAZ REV TRUST 2230 18TH AVE NE Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note NAPLES I State 1 FL Zipi 34120 Map No. Strap Nojnff� Section Township Range 3C27 ]IIIW332800 15 3C27 1 27 48 27 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 15 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitvl 11/09/99 ook- 2609-3249 Amount $ 0 09/30/96 2233-2409 $ 28,000 09/30/96 2233-2396 $ 0 09/01 /90 1560-1904 $ 0 08/01/90 1553-740 $ 0 Acres *Estimated 5.15 Millage Rates a *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 146,775 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 146,775 (-) 10% Cap $ 79,432 (_) Assessed Value $ 67,343 (_) School Taxable Value $ 146,775 (_) Taxable Value $ 67,343 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37743920009 Address 1 Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer Name / Add VIELE 11, DONALD L=& HEATHER L 4412 LYN H U RST RD SPRINGFIELD State 1 L I Zipj 62711-7130 Map No. Strap Nojnff� Section Township Range 3C27 332800 51 03C27 1 27 48 27 Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 51 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Acres *Estimated 5 Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 Latest Sales History 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll ot all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality)Sub'ect to Chan e) ook-Pa a Amount Land Value $ 131,770 7112'29/20 5867-3085 $ 0 (+) Improved Value $ 0 10/06/99 2598-2872 $ 30,000 (_� Market Value $ 131,770 (-) 10% Cap $ 66,389 (_) Assessed Value $ 65,381 (_) School Taxable Value $ 131,770 (_) Taxable Value $ 65,381 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37740880003 Address Site City NAPLES *Note 34120 *Disclaimer Name / Address City THI-PHAM, LIEN 530 102ND AVE N NAPLES I State 1 FL Zipj 34108-3209 Map No. ]111Strap Nojnff� Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 10 03C27 1 27 48 27 2.81 F— Legar GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 N 180FT OF TR 10 OR 1393 PG 1609 Millage Area la 1290 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other Total Use Code a 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) loj=ook-Pa a Amoun 11/09/88 1393-1609 $ 12,900 12/01/75 1 637-926 $ 0 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 80,085 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 80,085 (-) 10% Cap $ 43,339 (_) Assessed Value $ 36,746 (_) School Taxable Value $ 80,085 (_) Taxable Value $ 36,746 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 37741760009 Address Name / Address 4 City *Disclaimer SEGURA, ARCADIO=& NIDIA 4500 NW 192ND ST MIAMI GARDENS Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34120 Note State'FL Zip 33055-2124 Map No. Strap No].W Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 21 3C27 1 27 48 27 2.73 Legall GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W 180FT OF TR 21 OR 1312 PG 2002 Millage Area s 290 Sub./Condo 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 Use Code a 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 8.7835 1 13.6725 Latest Sales History 2021 Preliminary Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Sub'ect to Chan e) ook-Pa Amoun Land Value $ 77,805 12/01/87 1312-2002 $ 7,200 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 77,805 (-) 10% Cap $ 42,108 (_) Assessed Value $ 35,697 (_) School Taxable Value $ 77,805 (_) Taxable Value $ 35,697 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Appendix F Initial Alternatives Evaluation Table WILSON 4-LANE: 160 FT ROW WILSON 4-LANE: 170 FT ROW WILSON 4-LANE: 180 FT ROW WILSON 4-LANE: 190 FT ROW WILSON 4-LANE: 190 FT ROW OFFSET TO ®' ' OFFSET TO STRUCTURE (FT) - RIGHT (East) OFFSET TO STRUCTURE (FT) - LEFT (West) OFFSET TO STRUCTURE (FT) - RIGHT (East) STRUCTURE TYPE N/A >100 FT 95-100 90-95 85-90 80-85 75-80 70-75 65-70 60-65 55-60 50-55 45-50 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-70 70-75 75-80 80-85 85-90 90-95 95-100 >100 FT N/A STRUCTURETYPE BRIDGE, WATER MAINS OFFSET TO STRUCTURE (FT) - LEFT (West) OFFSET TO STRUCTURE (FT) - RIGHT (East) Note: Measurements are approximate and based on aerial imagery data. Data collection July 2021. Appendix G Proposed New Bridge Typical Section, Concept Plan, and Elevations Bullet Railing Post B1 PBR Index 515-022 27" Concrete Parapet Pedestrian/Bicycle Index 521-820 ---- 3-2" 0 Utility Conduits Index 630-010 (Typ.) 47'-10" (New Construction) Traffic Railing (36" Single -Slope) Index 521-427 (Typ.) PGL LT i Slope: 0.02 Ft/Ft P-4" Railing P-0" Pedestrian/ 6'-O" 4'-6" Bicycle Railing Construction Wilson Blvd. 6-95/s"} 12'-0" 12'-0" Lane Lane ---------------------------------- 12" FSB with 61 #2" Cast -in -Place Topping (Typ.) PHASE I - CONSTRUCTION i 2'-0" Barrier Construction Wilson Blvd. 2'-0" Shoulder �\ 12'-0" 12' -0" 7'-0" 51'-10" (Bridae Widenina) Sidewalk Shldr. Lane Lane Type K Temporary Barrier Traffic Railing Index 102-110 (Free -Standing) (36" Single -Slope) PGL LT Index 521-427 (Typ.) i Slope: 0.02 Ft/Ft Slope: 0,02 Ft/Ft "Z� L-1 17 ....... ......... 111:::11� .. ........ rT-- Lj 6 r— L�� 12" FSB with 61 #2" Cast -in -Place PHASE II - CONSTRUCTION Topping (Typ.) � Construction Wilson Blvd. 99'-8" Out -to -Out Bridae Width Bullet Railing Post BI PBR Index 515-022 (Typ.) 27" Concrete Parapet Pedestrian/Bicycle Index 521-820 (Typ.) 3---2" 0 Utility Conduits Index 630-010 (Typ.) 47-10" 5P-10" 1'-4" Railing 1'-4" Railing 1'-0" Pedestrian/ 6'-0" 6-6" 11'-0" 11'-0" 22'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0" 6-6" 10'-0" F-O" Pedestrian/ Bicycle Railing Sidewalk Bike Lane Lane Lane Median Lane Lane Bike Lane Pathway Bike Railing Bullet Railing F-4" 19'-4" F-4" Post BI Pedestrian/ 12" FSB with 61/2' Traffic Separator Traffic Railing Bicycle Railing Cast -in -Place T "F" Curb Type (36" Single -Slope) Index 515-022 (Typ.) Topping (Typ.) PGL LT PGL RT Index 521-427 (Typ.) 27" Concrete Parapet s Slope: 0.02 Ft/Ft Slope: 0.02 Ft/Ft Pedestrian/Bicycle a Index 521-820 (Typ.) Construction Joint 3-2" 0 Utility Conduits Index 630-010 (Typ.) PROPOSED - TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION PBR = Pedestrian/Bicycle Railing BRIDGE NO. XXXXXX REVISIONS BHUSHAN A. GODBOLE, PE NO. 54325 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD., SUITE 505 NAPLES, FL 34108 (239) 596-1715 DRAWN BY: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT SHEET TITLE: TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION REF. DWG. NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHECAoBY. BAG DESIGNED BY: ROAD NO. COUNTY COUNTY PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME. WILSON BOULEVARD OVER CYPRESS CANAL SHEET N0. COLLIER CHECKED BY: $USER$ $DATE$ 5TIMEs $FILE$ a, QU a a v I i+ Direction of Stationing E i J = iz O Q and b � r Ipp- Co Bridge � II II II II o a, I I I XXXXXX I I r o l Begin Approach I I I I I End Approach o Slab 1 Begin Bridge Int. Bent 2 oO int. Bent 3 I End Bridge Slab 2 Sta. 95+15.53 I Sta. 95+45.53 I Sta. 95+85.53 I I Sta. 96+25.53 I Sta. 96+65.53 Sta. 96+95.53 Q a 0 0 0 95 I Left PGL I 9 I Q_ I a I II a o * N g I I CL Construction Wilson Blvd. I I I I M PPI. l i U o� o I I Right PGL I I I I 90°00'00" (Typ.) rn o II II II Exsg I I I I - B I I I Bridig'I tinNo. I I I I Cr n J Approach Slab I I I 034032 I I I I °z (Typ') 0 _ W a I I II II U) J � Q Y M ro Q W CL ^o CL _ G I ' J F— `o w J PLAN Begin Bridge 120'-0" Overall Bridge Length c End Bent 1 End Bridge � End Bent 4 LEGEND w J 30'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0" 30'-0" w MVC - Minimum Vertical Clearance LU Approach Span I Span 2 Span 3 Approach z Pedestrian/Bicycle Slab I Slab 2 E - Expansion Bearing Bullet RailingInt. Bent 2 Int. Bent 3 Ln 27" Concrete Parapet EJ -Deck Expansion Joint Index 515-022 Index 521-820 w EJ DHW (50-Yr.) _ (TBD) Control = 9.2 EJ DHW -Design High Water Elevation = 25 25 NHW - Normal High Water Elevation 20 20 E E E E E E _ 15 --------- 15 10---1i-- J -� 1,2*71 10 0 5 Existing II 2 I I MVC Required = 2.0' Min. 5 0 Ground Line D 0 w -5 �I I� Concrete Pile (Typ.) -5 Proposed Ground Line Index 455-018 Q El. 0.5 Wildlife Shelf (TBD) w Rubble Riprap (Typ.) o ELEVATION BRIDGE NO. XXXXXX = REVISIONS BHUSHAN A. GODBOLE, PE NO, 54325 DRAWN BY. SNEI= TITLE. REF. DWG. NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE BY DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY JACO85 ENGINEERING GROUP INC. CHECKEEDBY: uRowTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTPLAN AND ELEVATION 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD., SUITE 505 BAG NAPLES, FL 34108 DESIGNEDBY: ROAD NO. COUNTY COUNTY PROJECT ID PRWECTNME: SHEET N0. (239) 596-1715 CHECKED BY: COLLIER WILSON BOULEVARD OVER CYPRESS CANAL 81-] $USER$ $DATE$ $TIMES $FILE$ Appendix H Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum .;acobs Memorandum 9010 Strada Stell Ct. Suite 108 Naples, FL 34109 United States www.jacobs.com Subject Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Project Name Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Attention Thomas Sivert, P.E./Collier County Public Utilities From Jacobs Date January 7, 2022 1. Background and Purpose The Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study (hereafter, the "Study") will evaluate proposed future corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard North (hereafter, "Wilson Boulevard"), from Immokalee Road (County Road 846) to Golden Gate Boulevard East/West (hereafter, "Golden Gate Boulevard"), from a two-lane, undivided roadway to a four -lane, divided facility with curb and gutter. The study area is located in northern Collier County, Florida, east of Interstate 75, and extends approximately 3.2 miles along Wilson Boulevard and includes a proposed bridge replacement at the Cypress Canal. Figure 1 presents the study area. The Collier County Public Utilities Department (PUD) owns and operates eight production wells within the study area. The wells are part of the County's Golden Gate Wellfield, pumping water from the lower Tamiami aquifer. The roadway widening project anticipates the need for an additional 30 feet of right of way (ROW) from the existing western ROW easement. Figure 2 shows the existing and proposed roadway typical sections. According to Collier County staff, the existing County production wells within this system produce approximately 21 percent of the drinking water supply to Collier County residents and no more than two wells can be out of service at one time during the construction of the roadway widening project without significantly impacting the system's production supply. The existing County production wells along Wilson Boulevard are located within the proposed 165-foot typical section. An analysis was performed to evaluate the roadway widening impacts on the existing County production wells and associated utility infrastructure. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an impact assessment for the existing wells and associated infrastructure within the project area and to recommend potential improvements, if needed, to allow these facilities to remain operational and accessible after implementation of the proposed Wilson Boulevard roadway improvements. Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum arlcka iz& O nEa91c5 a CUuntry Club half Club 1 q � � ■ 1 Ih VE NW ■ ► Randall BLVD lmmokafee-Rfl- aam AVE NW 24th AVE NE 4 O r AVE NW 22tld AVt NE $ � J o ~ 20%AVE N* 2ft AVh NE y p ■ 78lhAVENE 18th AVE NW o L 3 J 6LVo W � � Juno BLVQ E S c7 781h AVE HW 161h AVE NE �5 L ,rj ` 14ih AVE raw 141h AVE HE r iftAVE NW _ 121hAVE NE ♦Fde FlopWa Golf Club 1ph qyE Nyy loth AVE NE a�; ra1% _ _ c — G.I. U .,� air Cs� x gg z x i Y in Ngg ry ry M GoldeA .. AL tlY Goloe a' FU E I ' County Road Golf Course -oval Road Study Limits 11I Canal Q y 0 0.25 0.5 0,7 1 7Walur Body Stud Area NE3KMEWI�BS — Figure 1. Project Study Area PP512062112255WF 2 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum EXISTING IWRIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT F Z W 2 w m a w a 3 LL O H 2 a' Z F N X w (VARIES AT WELL SITES) "RIGHT OF WAY LIMITSIDISTRIBUTION SUBJECT TO CHANGE DURING DESIGN Figure 2. Existing and Proposed Typical Sections PP512062112255WF Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 2. Existing Conditions Existing conditions at each well, including the wellheads, associated infrastructure, ROW, facility access, and surrounding private utilities, were documented to evaluate the impact of the roadway widening project and improvements needed. 2.1 Existing Infrastructure Eight wells are located within the project limits. Two wells are within well houses (well numbers [Nos.] 11 and 14), four wells are in vaults (well Nos. 12, 13, 15, and 16), and one well is on a wellhead pad (well No. 37). There are two additional well vaults (well Nos. 9 and 10) located south of Golden Gate Boulevard. Well No. 10 will be impacted by the intersection taper area that transitions the four -lane facility (additional lanes) back to the existing two-lane facility. Well No. 9 is located further south, outside the proposed roadway construction limits. There are also three well vaults (well Nos. 31, 32, and 34) located within approximately 0.1 mile west of the study area, along the cross streets of 10th Avenue Northwest, 12th Avenue Northwest, and 14th Avenue Northwest, which connect to the existing raw water main along Wilson Boulevard. As illustrated on Figure 3, the existing production wells adjacent to and within the study area are all located along the west side of Wilson Boulevard. These wells operate under the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Water Use Permit No. 1 1-00249-W. 2.1.1 Raw Water Main The 24-inch-diameter raw water main located along the west side of Wilson Boulevard conveys water from the production wells to the north and south regional water treatment plants. The existing raw water main has an aerial crossing at the Cypress Canal, west of the existing Wilson Boulevard roadway bridge. According to Collier County geographic information system (GIS) data, the 24-inch-diameter raw water main pipe material varies between polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and ductile iron. The discharge piping from the wells along Wilson Boulevard are ductile iron, and the discharge piping from the wells located on cross streets, connecting to the 24-inch-diameter raw water main, include a 12-inch-diameter ductile iron pipe from well No. 31, a 12-inch-diameter PVC pipe from well No. 32, and an 8-inch-diameter PVC pipe from well No. 34. n 4 `c = _ m r r. ❑ m M a allo sr ww r � r m 1 m m r c isrsrruw� Ei WILSOH LVo n 0 _ ! T_ r.a m p 2 = j I 2Nb 9T NE i m m m m m RKSCFZE CANAL 7Raw treets Water Mam p 0,25 LED Production Well -CawuC nKy Pl1D.FG Figure 3. Existing County Production Wells along Study Area PPS12062112255WF 4 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 2.1.2 Well Houses at Well Nos. 11 and 14 The well No. 11 site includes a single -story well house measuring approximately 24 feet wide by 24 feet Long. Overhead power lines cross Wilson Boulevard to the north of the well house as shown in Figure 4 and Attachment 1, which also provides additional photographs of well sites within the study area. The building houses a 250-kilovolt-ampere (kVA) diesel generator. A diesel storage tank is located in a separate room of the well house that is accessible from outside of the building on the south side. The building has louvers on the west wall for the generator air intake and access is by double doors on the east side of the building. A 12-foot-wide driveway provides access from Wilson Boulevard, and the site does not include fencing. Figure 4. Power Pole and Lines near Well House No. 11 A new wellhead was installed at well No. 11 and is located inside a vault just south of the well house. The vault is approximately 7 feet wide by 12 feet long, and there is an 8-inch-diameter discharge pipe exiting the vault and running north into the well house as shown in Figure S. The flow control valve, pressure gauges, air relief valves, and flowmeter are housed within the well house. The discharge pipe exits the well house to the east to connect to the existing 24-inch-diameter raw water main; buried isolation and blow - off valves are located at this connection point. Figure 5. Well No. 11 Wellhead Vault and Wellhead Ia9-SINi7:f s941 4"'k19 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum The well house at well No. 11 also houses the electrical, instrumentation, and controls that monitor and control well Nos. 9, 10, 11, and 12. The building and site layout for the well house at well No. 14 are similar to well No. 11. However, at well No. 14, the wellhead is located inside the well house and there is no vault at the site. The well houses at well Nos. 11 and 14 both include a latched roof access to facilitate crane access to the equipment housed inside. Remote terminal unit 14 is housed in the well No. 14 well house and monitors and controls well Nos. 13, 14, 15, and 16. The generator at well No. 14 was recently replaced with a new unit. The well No. 14 site does not include fencing; however, a private homeowner fence runs along the south boundary of the site. 2.1.3 Vaults at Well Nos. 10, 12, 13, 15, and 16 Wellheads at well Nos. 10, 12, 13, 15, and 16 are housed within vaults, and these well sites do not include well houses, standby generators, or site fencing. Each location consists of two connected vaults, one containing the wellhead and the other containing the valves and flowmeter. An electrical panel is provided at each well site. The wellheads at each site discharge to the east and exit their respective vaults to connect to the 24-inch-diameter raw water main. Figure 6 presents a typical well vault (well No. 12). At each site, the connection point of the well discharge pipe to the raw water main contains buried isolation and a blow -off valves. Figure 6. Well No. 12 Pump and Valve Vaults (Typical) 2.1.4 Wellhead Pad at Well No. 37 Well No. 37 is located at the northern limit of the existing raw water main. The wellhead discharge pipe, flow control valve, air relief valve, instrumentation and controls, and electrical components are above ground on a concrete pad as shown in Figure 7. The site is enclosed with fencing and the access gate and driveway are located on the east side of the site. There is a pig launching station within the fenced area for cleaning the raw water main. Figure 8 shows the pig launching station. Ia9-SINi7:UEINU4"'k19 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Figure 7. Well No. 37 Wellhead Pad Figure 8. Pig Launching Station at Well No. 37 PPS1206211225SWF 7 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 2.2 Surrounding Utilities A Sunshine 811 call was performed in August 2021. Table 1 summarizes the ticket information obtained. A copy of the Sunshine ticket is provided in Attachment 2. Major utilities along the study area include the 24-inch-diameter raw water main, overhead transmission/electric, and gas. The Florida Power and Light (FPL) overhead electric distribution system runs along the east side of Wilson Boulevard, and the County raw water main and TECO gas line runs underground along the west side of the roadway. The overhead electric crosses the roadway (to the west) throughout the study area for distribution to residential properties, as well as to supply power to well Nos. 11 and 14. Table 1. Sunshine 811 Ticket Summary Utility Owner Utility Type Collier County Traffic Operations Electric, Fiber Collier County Information Technology Fiber Collier County Road Maintenance Irrigation Centurylink Fiber, Telephone City of Naples - Water Water Collier County Stake & Locates Sewer, Water Comcast CATV Florida Power & Light - Collier Electric Summit Broadband Fiber, Telephone TECO Peoples Gas - Ft. Myers Gas 2.3 Existing Right of Way and Easements Recorded plats for Golden Gate Estates indicate an existing 100-foot road ROW easement from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. This road ROW easement consists of two 50-foot easements east and west of the property plat lines (refer to Figure 2 in Section 1). Additionally, the Collier County Water Sewer District has utility easements along the western ROW limit, surrounding the well houses and vaults. For example, the well houses at well Nos. 11 and 14 have 30-foot-by-30-foot utility easements, and the vault at well No. 13 has a 15-foot-by-15-foot utility easement. 2.4 Facility Access Each well site has an approximately 12-foot-wide by 40-foot-long driveway from Wilson Boulevard. The hydraulic truck crane and outriggers used to maintain the wells extend to an approximately 21.5-foot- wide-by-38-foot-long area and setup on the paved driveways. The existing driveways are offset from overhead electric serving the sites to avoid conflict when the crane is servicing the wellheads (refer to Figure 9). Ia9-SINi1-ftsINU9"19 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Figure 9. Well No. 11 Well House Exterior 3. Impacts and Alternatives Analysis The roadway widening project proposes a 165-foot typical section, requiring an additional 30 feet along the western ROW easement. Additionally, the vertical profile for the proposed project is anticipated to be raised by approximately 2 to 3.5 feet (varied along the corridor) from the existing roadway elevation to accommodate base clearance from the roadway base layer to the seasonal high-water table, and stormwater hydraulics. The change in the roadway's vertical and horizontal profiles will impact the drainage at the existing well sites and will result in the need for site improvements. Retaining walls will be required at each well site when the roadway is constructed to support the vertical difference from the existing well sites to the proposed back of sidewalk within the roadway widening project. Alternatives were evaluated for the raw water main and each well site based on cost, constructability, and impacts to the production well system's operability during construction. 3.1 Raw Water Main The existing 24-inch-diameter raw water main is Located on the west side of the existing ROW, running north to well No. 37 (northernmost well). The existing raw water main will be located under the proposed southbound lanes of the roadway widening project. Therefore, several locations were evaluated to potentially relocate the existing raw water main. Figure 10 shows each alternative in relation to the proposed roadway improvements. Table 2 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. • Alternative 1: Leave the raw water main in its existing location. • Alternative 2: Relocate the raw water main from the east side of the wells to the west side of the wells, adjacent to the proposed western ROW limit. The raw water main would be routed west of each well site to stay to the west of existing infrastructure. • Alternative 3: Relocate the raw water main to the proposed roadway median. • Alternative 4: Relocate the raw water main between the existing wells and southbound travel Lanes, underneath or adjacent to the proposed sidewalk. This would be similar to the existing alignment, except the raw water main would be relocated approximately 20 feet to the west. Ia9-SINi7:UEINU4"'k19 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum • Alternative 5: Relocate the raw water main adjacent to the eastern ROW limit. t ALTERNATIVE 5 R'• Alternative 3 - Existing Location Alternative 4 -Between Welland Roadway Altemative 2 - Western ROW Limit Altemative 5 - Eastem ROW Limit r - Alternative 3 - Median — Proposed ROW Limits Figure 10. Raw Water Main Relocation Alternatives Discussions with Collier County PUD indicate the preferred alternative is to have the raw water main relocated to the western ROW limit (Alternative 2) to facilitate its construction and accommodate access for future maintenance needs. This alternative would allow maintenance without the impacts of demolishing sidewalk and asphalt roadway or requiring maintenance of traffic. Sections 3.2 through 3.4 of this report evaluates the subsequent impacts associated with the raw water main relocation as identified in Alternative 2 (relocate to the western ROW limit). PPS1206211225SWF 10 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Table 2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Raw Water Main Relocation Alternatives Alternative Advantages Disadvantages No. Description 1 Raw water main Minimal to no immediate capital investment • Difficult to access for maintenance once roadway is widened remains at existing . Increased repair costs for work under roadway due to maintenance of traffic Location (MOT), demolition of roadway to access raw water main, and repairs to roadway when complete • Major impacts to traffic during repairs due to lane closure(s) required • The existing raw water main probably was not designed for the deeper depth and additional traffic load 2 Relocate the raw • Allows for maintenance without impacting traffic or • Would require additional bends (and minor additional headloss) to route water main to the proposed infrastructure (sidewalk or roadway discharge piping in the opposite direction to the raw water main western ROW limit elements) . Requires capital investment • Can be constructed before roadway widening construction begins 3 Relocate the raw • Allows access for maintenance where there is open • Left -turn lanes in the median at each cross street result in reduced access for water main to the median maintenance; may require MOT, impacts to traffic, and demolish/repair of proposed median . Less bends in discharge piping to the raw water roadway for maintenance under roadway segments (turn lanes or intersections main (still has bends due to proposed slope) and at each well site crossing under southbound lanes) • Will not be in alignment to connect to the existing raw water main when crossing south under Golden Gate Boulevard (don't want main under center of intersection) and would require additional bends to realign raw water main to western ROW limit • Needs to be constructed with the roadway project (cannot be constructed before) • Longer down time to operations during construction • Requires capital investment PP512062112255WF 11 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Table 2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Raw Water Main Relocation Alternatives Alternative Advantages Disadvantages No. Description 4 Relocate the raw Less bends in discharge piping from well to the raw May require demolition/repair of sidewalk for maintenance; would require water main between water main (still has bends due to proposed slope) bends in the raw water main at each intersection (6), due to turn lanes and U- the existing wells turn accommodation areas, and U-turn accesses (3) to avoid placing the raw and southbound water main underneath the roadway, or if constructed underneath the roadway, travel lanes maintenance may impact traffic, demolish/repair roadway, etc. • More bends in the raw water main than Alternative 2 and more complicated piping for blow -offs • Reduces area for placement of other utilities such as fiber, communication, etc. due to slope of ditch • Needs to be constructed with the roadway project (cannot be constructed before), therefore results in a longer down time to operations during construction • Requires capital investment 5 Relocate the raw Less bends in discharge piping to the raw water Conflicts with overhead electric poles water main to the main (still has bends due to proposed slope) Will not be in alignment to connect to the existing raw water main when eastern ROW limit crossing south under Golden Gate Boulevard (do not want main under center of intersection) and would require additional bends to get raw water main to western ROW limit • May require MOT, impacts to traffic, and demolish/repair roadway for maintenance needed at crossings under roadway (each well site and raw water main returning to west side of road) • Repairs to discharge piping under roadway would need to be phased to reduce impacts to traffic and needs to be constructed with the roadway project (cannot be constructed before) • Longer down time to operations during construction • Longer discharge pipes from wells to the raw water main and pipes will be under the road • Requires capital investment PP512062112255WF 12 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 3.2 Production Wells 3.2.1 Facility Access and Site Layout The existing driveways to each well site will be in conflict with the proposed southbound lanes and will be demolished with the road widening project. Each site will require a new driveway, and a sidewalk is recommended at well houses at well Nos. 11 and 14. County staff requested the driveways to accommodate the hydraulic truck cranes that service the wells, which are approximately 21.5 feet wide by 38 feet long. Three alternatives were evaluated for driveway access. Table 3 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. Alternative 1: Construct the driveway adjacent to the wells for parking in the east -west direction. The driveway would be located to the north or south of the well, depending on overhead utilities and proximity of existing residential driveways. This is similar to the layout of the existing driveway access. Alternative 2: Construct the driveway adjacent to the wells for parking in the north -south direction. The length of the driveway and turning radius would need to be designed for the crane (38 feet long). • Alternative 3: Construct the driveway in a "U" shape around the well site, with two driveway access points (north and south of the well) along the proposed southbound lanes. Table 3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Driveway Configuration Alternatives Alternative Advantages Disadvantages No. Description 1 Driveway in • Least cost, smallest • Truck crane driver needs to back up into oncoming East-West impact and driveway area traffic to leave the site Direction required 2 Driveway in • Allows the truck crane • May conflict with adjacent homeowner driveways North -South driver to back up easier • Larger driveway area required than Alternative 1 Direction into oncoming traffic in the southbound lanes the fill and asphalt and would be required for a larger driveway as well as additional drainage piping 3 Driveway in "U" • Allows the truck crane • A large turning radius would be required to Shape driver to drive forward accommodate the design vehicle (truck crane), and onto the driveway and therefore, a larger easement area would be needed forward to leave the site from the adjacent property owner(s) (eliminates the need to . May conflict with adjacent homeowner driveways backup into oncoming traffic) • Largest driveway area required compared to Alternative 1 and 2 • Additional fill and asphalt and would be required for a Larger driveway as well as additional drainage piping Jacobs recommends Alternative 1 because it has the least impact on adjacent properties. Since the existing wells and infrastructure will not be raised above the floodplain when the road is widened, the surrounding site elevations at each well should be evaluated during design to ensure site runoff drains to the proposed roadway swales and does not collect and flood the well sites. PPS12062112255WF 13 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 3.2.2 Impacts at Well Nos. 11 and 14 (Well Houses) 3.2.2.1 Piping Impacts to well houses at well Nos. 11 and 14 were evaluated based on the proposed improvements for the roadway widening project. Piping modifications will be needed to connect the discharge pipe from each well to the relocated 24-inch-diameter raw water main. Two alternatives were evaluated to connect the discharge pipe to the relocated 24-inch-diameter raw water main to the western ROW limit. Table 4 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. Alternative 1: Piping to remain in the wellhead vault and well house. Modify the buried discharge pipe outside of the well house so it turns 90 degrees to the south and then west to connect to the relocated raw water main as shown in Figure 11. The isolation and blow -off valves will be relocated to the south side of the well house. • Alternative 2 2a (Well No. 11): Demolish the wellhead vault and raise the wellhead above the flood plain. Install new piping and concrete pad. The discharge pipe would be routed west to connect to the relocated 24-inch-diameter raw water main as shown in Figure 12. The isolation and the blow -off valves will be relocated to the west side of the wellhead. — 2b (Well No. 14): Since the wellhead remains inside the well house and there is no associated wellhead vault, the difference from Alternative 1 is to change the under -slab pipe. Instead of routing east inside the building then turning south outside, the under -slab pipe will turn south inside the building. Hew 24' Raw Water Main Well No11 Building sting 8' t7istharge Piping Wellhead Vauit SIR, Wellhead Hew 8' Pipe 7E7xisfing kew Blrnroff Proposed Figure 11. Well No. 11— Alternative 1 Piping Modifications Typical PPS12062112255WF 14 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum New 24" Raw Water Main Well No. 11 Building New Discharge Ripe, Valve, Flawmeter New, Raised wel[bead a • Hew Concrete Pad Hew 6lnwaff LEG�HD Proposed Figure 12. Well No. 11 — Alternative 2a Piping Modifications Table 4. Advantages and Disadvantages of Discharge Piping Alternatives at the Well Houses Alternative Advantages Disadvantages No. Description 1 Piping to remain inside the Lower capital investment • Discharge pipping will be under building, turn south outside of compared to Alternative 2a concrete sidewalk leading from the building doors to proposed driveway • More bends 2a Demolish Well No. 11 vault, Minimum number of bends • Significantly higher initial capital raise wellhead, build wellhead Discharge pipe is easily cost pad, install new discharge pipe accessible • Longer down time to operations that runs west during construction • Requires relocation of electrical panels, conduits, conductors, and signal wires 2b Route Well No. 14 under -slab • Less number of bends • Slightly higher initial capital cost pipe to turn south inside the . No discharge piping will be under . Longer down time to operations building the sidewalk during construction Since Alternative 2 has a significantly greater capital cost compared to Alternative 1, Jacobs recommends Alternative 1 as the more cost-efficient alternative with the shortest construction duration and associated service interruptions. PPS12062112255WF 15 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 3.2.2.2 Well House Impacts at Well Nos. 11 and 14 The existing well houses have double doors on the east side of the building. Well house modifications will be needed due to the proximity of the proposed sidewalk and retaining wall, which will not allow sufficient clearance to remove the generator from the well house through the existing double doors. Three alternatives were evaluated to modify the well houses to access the generators. Table 5 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. • Alternative 1: No changes to the well house. County staff would access the generator by removing the Louvers on the west wall. A new concrete sidewalk would be installed to connect the east double doors to the new driveway as shown in Figure 13. • Alternative 2: Convert the louvers on the west wall to a new set of double doors, convert the existing double doors on the east wall to louvers, and reverse the direction of the generator inside the well house. Installation of a new concrete sidewalk on the west side of the building, outside the new set of double doors would be required to connect to the proposed driveway. • Alternative 3: Relocate the generators to prefabricated enclosures. The fuel tank can remain at its current location, be included within the prefabricated enclosure, or be installed as an underground belly tank. A double -wall or bullet-proof fuel tank may be evaluated based on setback requirements. Table 5. Advantages and Disadvantages of Well House Modification Alternatives for Generator Access Alternative Advantages Disadvantages No. Description 1 Access generator by removing • No initial capital investment • More challenging to remove and louvers from west wall (building remains as is) replace generator from building, when required 2 Reverse direction of generator • Can replace generator . Requires capital investment and switch louvers and doors without building • Requires east and west wall to opposite sides of the modifications once modifications to accommodate the building improvements are complete opening sizes required for the doors and louvers • Requires relocation of electrical panels, conduits, conductors, and signal wires 3 Relocate generator to Easier access to generator for • Requires largest capital investment prefabricated enclosure replacement • A larger easement from the adjacent property(s) may be required to avoid conflict with underground utilities relocated with the roadway widening project • Requires relocation of electrical panels, conduits, conductors, and signal wires • Need to connect/extend electrical power from generator to well house PPS1206211225SWF 16 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Figure 13. Alternative 1 - Recommended Improvements at Well No. 14 Well House Jacobs recommends Alternative 1 as the most cost-efficient alternative. 3.2.2.3 Electrical Modifications Jacobs recommends the following electrical modifications at well houses Nos. 11 and 14: • Coordinate with FPL to extend the primary power feeders to the transformer's primary side (refer to Figure 14). • Relocate power communication handholes shown in Figure 15. • Run new conduits and conductors from well house No. 11 to well Nos. 9 and 10. Reconnect power at each disconnect switch for well Nos. 9 and 10 located south of well No. 11. • Run new conduit and conductors from well house No. 11. Reconnect power to disconnect switch for well No. 12 located north of well No. 11. • Run new conduit and conductors from well house No. 14. Reconnect power to disconnect switch for well No. 13 located south of well No. 14. • Run new conduits and conductors from well house No. 14 to well Nos. 15 and 16. Reconnect power to each disconnect switch for well Nos. 15 and 16 located north of well house No. 14. • Run new conduit and connect fiber optic line to raw water booster pump station. • Coordinate with utility owner(s), as needed, for the relocation of other telecommunication cables, conductors, duct banks, and so forth. PPS1206211225SWF 17 .. i ff- Utility medium voltage power conductors to be removed and new installed Well House No.14 jq;r 1 r r • 5, d+ . Ile ' � •� �: sue, ~�'-�t- Handholes to be relocated ] ' Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 3.2.3 Impacts at Well Nos. 12, 13, 15, and 16 (Vaults) 3.2.3.1 Piping Modifications Two alternatives were evaluated to connect the discharge pipes from the vaults at well Nos. 12, 13, 15, and 16 to the relocated 24-inch-diameter raw water main. • Alternative 1: Maintain the existing piping inside the vaults and modify the buried discharge pipe outside the vaults. Reroute the buried discharge pipe to the south and west of the valve vault to connect to the relocated 24-inch-diameter raw water main on the west side of the vault as shown on Figure 16. Relocate the isolation and the blow -off valves to the south side of the vaults. Alternative 2: Modify the piping layout inside the vaults so the pipe leaves the valve vault on the west side to connect to the relocated 24-inch-diameter water main as shown on Figure 17. Alternative 2 eliminates some fittings and would result in Lower head losses through the pipe. New 24" Raw Water Main Existing 24" Raw Water Main Valve Vault Existing 8" Qischarge Piping Wellhead Vault E"xisting Wellhead �� New 8' Pipe a LEGEND New Blowoff Proposed Figure 16. Alternative 1 Vault Piping Modification Typical PPS1206211225SWF 19 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Figure 17. Alternative 2 Vault Piping Modification Typical Alternative 1 is recommended because it has a shorter construction period and associated service interruptions and a lower construction cost, and it will have the least impacts to operability during construction. 3.2.3.2 Electrical Modifications Refer to Section 3.2.2.3 Electrical Modifications. 3.3 Impacts at Well Nos. 9 and 10 (Vaults) 3.3.1 Piping Modifications The vault housing well No. 10 is located along the transition area for the roadway widening construction Limits. Based on existing geographic information system data provided by the County, the existing raw water main is located outside the limits of the asphalt construction adjacent to the vault at well No. 10. Therefore, it is recommended the relocated raw water main should reconnect to the existing raw water main north of well No. 10 and south of Golden Gate Boulevard. Therefore, no piping modifications will be required at the well No. 10 vault. Note that the location of the existing raw water main should be field verified by survey during design and evaluated accordingly. The vault housing well No. 9 is located outside the roadway widening construction limits, and no impacts are anticipated. 3.3.2 Electrical Modifications Refer to Section 3.2.2.3 Electrical Modifications. PPS1206211225SWF 20 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 3.3.3 Facility Access The driveway access at the well No. 10 vault will be impacted and demolished with the roadway widening project. The driveway will need to be reconstructed adjacent to the vault. No driveway access improvements are anticipated at the well No. 9 vault. 3.4 Impacts at Well No. 37 (Wellhead Pad) 3.4.1 Piping Modifications Well No. 37 is the northmost well within the study area, as well as within the Golden Gate Wellfield. This is the only well within the study area where the wellhead components are not in a vault or well house. Due to the exposed piping layout, the connection to the new raw water main is simplified. The buried pipe beyond the existing concrete pad can be connected to the relocated raw water main directly with an isolation valve. The blow -off and isolation valves will be relocated off the ROW. 3.4.2 Electrical Modifications Refer to Section 3.2.2.3 Electrical Modifications. 3.4.3 Site Layout The existing site is fenced, and the access gate on the east side of the site will be impacted by the retaining wall included in the roadway widening project. A new gate will be needed at the relocated site access from the new driveway. 4. Summary and Conclusions 4.1 Raw Water Main Jacobs recommends that the existing 24-inch-diameter raw water main from well No. 37 to the southern project limits (south of Golden Gate Boulevard) be relocated along the western limit of the proposed ROW. The outside edge of the 24-inch-diameter raw water main should be located at 5 feet from the proposed ROW limit. This location will avoid known utility conflicts while allowing for maintenance and repairs within the roadway ROW without a temporary construction easement. A more detailed review of existing utilities should be performed during the design phase. According to the SFWMD's Right of Way Criteria Manual, dated August 12, 2013, an aerial crossing cannot be located within 100 feet of a bridge or pile -supported utility crossing. As a result, Jacobs recommends a subaqueous installation of the 24-inch-diameter raw water main at the Cypress Canal. Jacobs recommends 45-degree (or lesser) bends when a change in elevation or alignment is required, to accommodate swabbing and pigging the line. The connection of the wells to the raw water main will be similar to the existing connections, with an 8-inch, cement -lined ductile -iron pipe. This project did not include hydraulic modeling to confirm that the 24-inch-diameter water main is adequate. Collier County indicated that the material for the new 24-inch-diameter raw water main should be based on market conditions and can consist of either PVC or lined ductile iron. Well Nos. 31, 32, and 34, located on the cross streets at 10th Avenue Northwest, 12th Avenue Northwest, and 14th Avenue will also have to be reconnected to the relocated raw water main. Additionally, the relocated raw water main will need to be reconnected to the existing raw water main at the end of the PPS12062112255WF 21 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum project limits. Reconnection to the existing raw water main is anticipated to be north of well No. 10 but south of Golden Gate Boulevard, as discussed in Section 3.3. The Collier Metropolitan Organization Long -Range Transportation Plan shows that the design of the widening and extension of Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Keane Avenue is planned for 2031 to 2035 as a new two-lane road, expandable to four -lanes. The segment identified would begin at the southern limits of the study area and continue south. Therefore, continuing the relocation of the 24-inch-diameter raw water main and potential impacts at each well site (including at well Nos. 9 and 10) should be evaluated during that project's design phase. 4.2 Facility Access and Site Layout The well houses and vaults will be located within the ROW of the proposed roadway widening's 165-foot typical section. The proposed improvements to the well sites and raw water main will require additional utility easements. Attachment 3 provides Conceptual Level Sketches and utility easement sizes recommended at each site. Based on the specifications for the HTC 8660 Series II hydraulic truck crane used by the County's contractor, Jacobs recommends a 15-foot-wide-by-40-foot-long asphalt pad, including a stabilized base surrounding the driveways (28 feet by 40 feet) to support the hydraulic truck crane and outriggers used to service the wellheads. An additional flat grass area is recommended adjacent to the asphalt driveways to accommodate additional vehicle parking for County employees when the crane is onsite, since the proposed roadway swales will be too steep for that purpose. The stabilized base shown in the Conceptual Level Sketches was extended to provide additional vehicular parking north and south of the proposed driveways. The driveway flare should be designed to accommodate the truck crane. Based on the specifications for hydraulic truck crane used by the County's contractor, the crane can service a maximum radius of 75 feet from the centerline of the driveway to the wellhead. The location of the driveways should be refined during design, once the proposed roadway elevation is determined, to place each driveway as close as possible to the wellhead. Additional utilities should be relocated on the east side of the roadway to avoid conflicts with the well and drainage infrastructure. During design, the installation of underground power lines at the well sites should be evaluated. Otherwise, the relocated power poles at each well site should be outside the driveway and crane servicing area and offset in accordance with the latest Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements for minimum distance. Fiber servicing the well sites should be offset from the relocated raw water main but adjacent to the main on the west side of the roadway. The perimeter fencing around the wellhead pad at well No. 37 will need to be modified to install a new access gate at the sidewalk from the relocated driveway. Jacobs recommends the installation of an inline roller gate to avoid conflicts with the elevation/slope. 4.3 Piping, Well House, and Vault Modifications Jacobs recommends the following piping, well house and vault modifications: • Well No. 11: The wellhead piping, equipment and other electrical and communication components should remain in place within the vault and well house, with modifications made to PPS12062112255WF 22 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum the buried discharge piping leaving the well house to connect to the relocated raw water main south of the well site. If County staff have to remove the generator from the well house, it should be removed through the west wall after removing the louvers. A concrete sidewalk will be installed at the east double doors to connect to the new driveway. County staff indicated that the generator at well No. 11 is scheduled to be replaced in the near future. Well No. 14: The wellhead piping and equipment should remain in place within the well house, with modifications made to the buried discharge pipe leaving the well house to connect to the relocated raw water main south of the well site. Similar to Well No. 11, if County staff have to remove the generator from the well house, it should be removed through the west wall after removing the louvers. A concrete sidewalk will be installed at the east double doors to connect to the new driveway. County staff indicated that the generator at well No. 14 was recently replaced. Well Nos. 12, 13, 1 S. and 16: The existing piping should remain in place, with modifications made to the buried discharge pipe outside the vaults to connect to the relocated raw water main south of the vaults. This option has a shorter construction period and will have the least impact to operability during construction. • Well No. 37: Jacobs recommends that the connection to the raw water main be relocated south of the well, downstream from the valve, so the pig launching station can remain. Collier County PUD prefers the connection to be configured as two 45-degee bends instead of matching the existing 90-degree bend. Jacobs also recommends that utility coordination be performed to extend the primary power feeders to the transformers' primary side, relocate all affected power handholes and communication handholes, and install new conduits for power to vaults at well Nos. 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, and 16. All affected fiberoptic cables and power conductors will need to be relocated. A summary of the recommendations is provided in Table 6. PPS1206211225SWF 23 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Table 6. Recommendations Summary Improvement Location Well Fiber Electrical Sitea Piping House` Replacement Replacemente Miscellaneous Well No. 9 N/A N/A N/A x x (vault) Well No. 10 x N/A N/A x x (va u It) Well No. 11 (well house) x x x x x Well No. 12 x x N/A x x (vault) Well No. 13 x x N/A x x Well Sites (vault) Well No. 14 (well house) x x x x x Well No. 15 x x N/A x x (va u It) Well No. 16 x x N/A x x (vault) Well No. 37 Install new gate; (pad) x x N/A x x relocate isolation valve Raw Water Well No. 37 Relocate 24-inch-diameter pipe and connect back to existing south of Golden Gate Main to north of Boulevard. Demolish abandoned piping. Includes a subaqueous crossing at the Cypress Relocation Well No. 10 Canal and open cut to cross the Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard Intersection; reconnect main to well Nos. 31, 32, and 34, located on the cross streets Notes: I Construct new asphalt driveway with stabilized base; new sidewalk (at well houses only). b New discharge piping to connect to relocated raw water main; relocate blow -off; demolish abandoned piping. c Access generator by removing louvers on the west wall. Reinstall louvers once the generator is back in the building. d Replace/relocate fiber optic line; reconnect to well site; replace/relocate communication handholes. e Replace underground power conduit; reconnect to site; relocate/replace power handholes. 4.4 Permitting Anticipated permitting requirements for the recommended improvements include: • SFWMD: Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) - include site improvements with the roadway widening project ERP PPS1206211225SWF 24 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum o Water use permit — courtesy notification to the district; a notification and the updated tables must be provided to SFWMD if quantities change regarding pump size, pump depth, well diameter, capacity o SFWMD ROW permit — will be needed for improvements (subaqueous crossing) at the Cypress Canal Army Corps of Engineers/Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP): o ERP — includes the recommended improvements with the ERP for the roadway widening project Written notification of work to FDEP • Collier County Growth Management Department: o County ROW permit - for construction of the relocated raw water main and site improvements within the County ROW Permitting requirements should be further evaluated during design to determine the state, local codes, and standards to adhere to. 4.5 Sequence of Construction The construction of the proposed roadway widening project is anticipated to last 24 months. The roadway widening project is included in the County's Five-year Work Program. The Program includes funding for the design and ROW acquisition phases beginning in Fiscal Year 2022 and funding for the construction phase in Fiscal Year 2024. The recommended improvements to the County production wells will be needed once the additional ROW is acquired, before construction of the roadway widening begins, to reduce construction down time. The relocated raw water main should be constructed first, followed by the piping between each well site and the relocated raw water main. The discharge pipe should be capped near the vaults or well houses. The existing valving allows for each well to be shut off from the system once the contractor is ready to make the connection to the relocated raw water main. Once the improvements are made at each well site, the well should be connected to the relocated raw water main when the well returns to service, abandoning its connection to the existing raw water main. The existing raw water main will remain in service during the installation of the new raw water main. 5. Cost Estimates Table 7 summarizes the conceptual -level (class 5) cost estimate for the recommended improvements. Roadway construction items such as the retaining wall, property acquisition, easement acquisition, and so forth, are not included in the estimate. PPS12062112255WF 25 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum Table 7. Recommended Improvement Cost Estimate Improvement Description Estimated Cost Vault 9 $35,000 Vault 10 $75,000 Well House 11 $175,000 Vault 12 $175,000 Well Site Improvementsa Vault 13 $175,000 Well House 14 $175,000 Vault 15 $175,000 Vault 16 $175,000 Vault 37 $175,000 Includes 24-inch- diameter raw water Raw Water Main Relocation main, fittings, valves, phasing, subaqueous crossing at canal, open - $4,375,000 cut crossing at Golden Gate Boulevard Total $5,710,000 a Excludes easements, includes electrical and fiber optic. [End of Memorandum] PPS12062112255WF 26 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum 6. References South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). ePermitting database. Accessed September 25, 2021. https://my.sfwmd.00v/ePermitting/PopuLate LOVs.do?flag=1 SFWMD Right of Way Criteria Manual for Use of Works or Lands of the District. 2013. Accessed November 8, 2021. https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/row_criteria_manua[.pdf Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. 2021. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.colliermpo.ora/lrtp/ PPS1206211225SWF 27 Attachment 1 Photo Log .;acobs Photo Log Project Title Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Location Wilson Boulevard, Naples, Florida Date December 7, 2021 Well No. 10 Photograph 1: Well No. 10 — Vault and driveway, Looking northwest Taken by. Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 3: Well No. 10 - Looking south Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 2: Well No. 10 — Vault and adjacent bus stop, looking west Taken by. Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 4: Well No. 10 — Utility boxes, looking west Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 PPS1206211223SWF 1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 Photograph 5: Well No. 10 - Vault and electrical panel, looking southwest Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 I a 9-S WIT-va l FJ►O4e1'tn/ 9 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 WeLL No. 11 Photograph 6: Well No. 11 - Overhead electric distribution across roadway and well house (left side of frame), looking north Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 7: Well No. 11 - Front of well house, Looking northwest Taken by..- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 8: Well No. 11 - Louvers on west Photograph 9: Well No. 11 - Vault on south of well side of well house, looking northeast house, looking east Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 TN Photograph 10: Well No. 11 - Front of well house, looking west Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 11: Well No. 11 - Generator and electrical panels inside of well house Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 PPS1206211223SWF 3 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 -2 Photograph 12: Well No. 11 - Piping and roof Photograph 13: Well No. 11 - West wall of well access latch inside well house, looking south house Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 14: Well No. 11 - Generator inside well house Photograph 15: Well No. 11 - Well house fuel tank access/room, looking north Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 4 PPS1206211223SWF Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 Photograph 16: Well No. 11 - Well house and Photograph 17: Well No. 11 - Generator tag driveway, looking north Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 18: Well No. 11 - Generator inside well house Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 �� F�i7.� f�i i F�►�e��n/ � Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 Well No. 12 Photograph 19: Well No. 12 - Front of vault Photograph 20: Well No. 12 - Vault and electrical and driveway, looking west panel, looking northwest Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Photograph 21: Well No 12 — Inside vault Photograph 22: Well No. 12 — Inside vault Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 6 PPS1206211223SWF Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 Well No. 14 Photograph 23: Well No. 14 — Well house and Photograph 24: Well No. 14 — Well house and truck crane that services County wells, looking existing property fence, looking northwest southwest Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Photograph 25: Well No. 14 — Piping inside Photograph 26: Well No. 14 —Generator inside well well house house Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken.• 8120121 PPS1206211223SWF 7 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 Photograph 27: Well No. 14 — Well house Photograph 28: Well No. 14 — Crane latch access generator exhaust over wellhead Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Datetaken: 8120121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken.- 812 012 1 Photograph 29: Well No. 14 — Generator Photograph 30: Well No. 14 — Generator tag Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 81201121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Photograph 31: Well No. 14 — Side of well Photograph 32: Well No. 14 — Generator tag house Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 8 PPS1206211223SWF Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 Photograph 33: Well No. 14 - Front of well Photograph 34: Well No. 14 - Overhead electric and house, looking west well house (right side of frame), looking south Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Photograph 35: Well No. 14 - South side of Photograph 36: Well No. 14 - West side of well well house, looking west house, looking northeast Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 1211121 PPS1206211223SWF 9 Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment December 7, 2021 Well No. 37 Photograph 37: Well No. 37 - Gate access and driveway to wellhead pad, looking west Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Photograph 38: Well No. 37 - Wellhead pad, looking west Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Photograph 39: Well No. 37 - Piping and Photograph 40: Well No. 37 - Pig launching station, panels, looking southwest looking east Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken.• 8120121 Photograph 41: Well No. 37 - Inside fenced area, looking northeast Taken by.- Felicia Kirby Date taken: 8120121 10 PPS1206211223SWF Attachment 2 Sunshine 811 Ticket 8/16/2021 FL811 I Ticket Ticket : 228103929 Rev:000 Taken: 08/16/21 12:01ET State: FL Cnty: COLLIER GeoPlace: NAPLES CallerPlace: NAPLES Subdivision: Address : Street WILSON BLVD N Cross 1 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W Within 1/4 mile: Y Cross 2 : IMMOKALEE RD Locat: DESIGN REQUEST FOR BOTH SIDES OF WILSON BLVD N FROM GOLDEN GATE BLVD W TO IMMOKALEE RD Remarks : IN RESPONSE TO RECEIPT OF A DESIGN TICKET, SSOCOF PROVIDES THE ORIGINATOR OF THE DESIGN TICKET WITH A LIST OF SSOCOF MEMBERS IN THE VICINITY OF THE DESIGN PROJECT. SSOCOF DOES NOT NOTIFY SSOCOF MEMBERS OF THE RECEIPT BY SSOCOF OF A DESIGN TICKET. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER TO CONTACT SSOCOF MEMBERS TO REQUEST INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOCATION OF SSOCOF MEMBERS' UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. SUBMISSION OF A DESIGN TICKET WILL NOT SATISFY THE REQUIREMENT OF CHAPTER 556, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO NOTIFY SSOCOF OF AN INTENT TO EXCAVATE OR DEMOLISH. THAT INTENT MUST BE MADE KNOWN SPECIFICALLY TO SSOCOF IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY LAW. IN AN EFFORT TO SAVE TIME ON FUTURE CALLS, SAVE YOUR DESIGN TICKET NUMBER IF YOU INTEND TO BEGIN EXCAVATION WITHIN 90 DAYS OF YOUR DESIGN REQUEST. THE DESIGN TICKET CAN BE REFERENCED, AND THE INFORMATION ON IT CAN BE USED TO SAVE TIME WHEN YOU CALL IN THE EXCAVATION REQUEST. *** LOOKUP BY BETWEEN *** Grids 2613A8136C 2614A8136C 2614B8136C 2614C8136C 2614D8136C Grids 2615A8136C 2615B8136C 2615C8136C 2615D8136C 2616B8136C Grids 2616C8136C 2616D8136C Work date: 08/16/21 Time: 11:57ET Hrs notc: 000 Category: 6 Duration: UNKNOWN Due Date : 08/18/21 Time: 23:59ET Exp Date : 09/15/21 Time: 23:59ET Work type: DESIGN Boring: N White -lined: N Ug/Oh/Both: U Machinery: N Depth: UNK Permits: N N/A Done for : DESIGN Company JOHNSON ENGINEERING Type: CONT Co addr 2122 JOHNSON ST City FORT MYERS State: FL Zip: 33902 Caller JENNIFER CHROVIAN Phone: 239-334-0046 Ext: 2463 Contact JOSH HILDEBRAND Phone: 239-334-0046 BestTime: 8AM TO 5PM Mobile 239-745-8601 Fax 239-334-3661 Email JLC@JOHNSONENG.COM Submitted: 08/16/21 12:01ET Oper: JEN Chan: WEB Mbrs : CC1255 CC1650 CC2156 CNTL01 CON762 CPW592 CTV413 FPLCLR OTC811 PGSSW https://exactix.sunshine8l l .com/tickets/view/2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l675e46fde(print:print/ticketTextl2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l675e46fde)#ta... 1 /2 8/16/2021 FL811 I Ticket * Responses are current as of 08/16/2021 12:01 PM Ex. Circum Service Area UtilityType(s) Contact Alt. Contact Emergency Contact Positive Response No COLLIER COUNTY ELECTRIC, FIBER PAM WILSON HARIS DOMOND HARIS DOMOND TRAFFIC (239)252-8260 (239)252-5000 (239)252-5000 OPERATIONS SECTION CC1255 No COLLIER COUNTY FIBER JOE OLIVER HARIS DOMOND HARIS DOMOND INFORMATION (239) 252-6205 (239) 252-5000 (239) 252-5000 TECHNOLOGY (IT) CC1650 No COLLIER COUNTY IRRIGATION PAMELA LULICH DIANE LYNCH BCC ROAD (239) 252-8924 (239) 252-8924 MAINTENANCE x5820 CC2156 No CENTURYLINK FIBER, TELEPHONE BILL MCCLOUD THOMAS STURMER TAC CENTER CNTL01 (850) 599-1444 (720) 578-8090 (800) 778-9140 No CITY OF NAPLES- WATER ALICIA ACEVEDO ALICIA ACEVEDO WATER PLANT WATER (239) 213-4712 (239) 213-4712 (AFTER 4:30PM) CON762 (239) 213-4745 No COLLIER COUNTY SEWER, WATER ERIC FEY COLLIER COUNTY AFTER 5:00 PM / STAKE & LOCATES (239) 252-1037 STAKES & LOCATES ON -CALL LOCATOR CPW592 (239) 252-5924 (239) 825-1444 No COMCAST CATV JOSH DAVIS HFC HELP DESK CTV413 (239)253-7642 (855)962-8525 No FLORIDA POWER & ELECTRIC JOEL BRAY USIC DISPATCH LIGHT --COLLIER (386) 586-6403 CENTER FPLCLR (800)778-9140 No SUMMIT FIBER, TELEPHONE MICHELLE DANIEL DENISE SMITH NETWORK BROADBAND (407) 996-1183 (407) 258-3237 OPERATION CENTER OTC811 No TECO PEOPLES GAS GAS - FT MYERS P (407) 996-1188 JOAN DOMNING SHARON BECK TECO PEOPLES GAS (813) 275-3783 (813) 853-9337 CUSTOMER SERVICE** (877) 832-6747 https:Hexactix.sunshine8l l .com/tickets/view/2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l 675e46fde(print: printlticketTexV2ebc2792-feab-11 eb-82f7-f2l 675e46fde)#ta... 2/2 Attachment 3 Conceptual Level Sketches IN A` Ipp 1„ 0 800 1800 24DO Scale In Feet o w END 24" RAW WATER MAIN (AT WELLHEAD PAD 37) :* m 18TH AVE NW WELLHEAD PAD 37 (SEE DWG 05-C-217) ¢ z WILSON BLVD WIDENING (SEE SEPARATE PLANS) SUB -AQUEOUS CANAL CROSSING (METHOD OF CROSSING TBD BY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION) :!, GOLDEN GATE BL BEGIN 24" RAW WATER MAIN RELOCATION (CONNECT TO EXISTING NORTH OF WELL VAULT 10) z 0 W 24" RAW WATER MAIN (RW) 12,300' t (2.3 MILES) FROM WELL 37 TO NORTH OF WELL VAULT 10 p z a �w W� �Q W a LL u WELL VAULT 16 U!D• w-0`N„ 0 ¢LL. ❑ 5 a z y�? OW 3 (SEE DWG 05-C-216) raW ;s o Q N2 [O WELL VAULT 15 (SEE DWG 05-C-215) WELL HOUSE 14 (SEE DWG 05-C-214) WELL VAULT 13 [SEE DWG 05-C-213 J J¢ Z M V WELL VAULT 12 j�— O 2 (SEE DWG 05-C-212) ri g ❑ U 0 WELL HOUSE 11 z (SEE DWG 05-C-211) 0 V) Lu /7 WELL VAULT 10 J Z) VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE INCH ON (SEE DWG 05-C-210) ORIGINALI RAY RNG. DATE NOVEMBER2021 Uj U PROJ D3514001 DWG 45-C-207 O SHEET ShtNum of SntTo U JRL WSCITSO-APPOMCS_workdiA46M1302988_1105-C-207_D3514001.dga FILENAME: 05-C-201_D3514001.dgn PLOT DATH:7212V2021 PLOT TIME: 528:58AI N (T) D 10 20 30 \ SC91® In F99t \ I S ` I I I I i 7A�U� 14 1 Nino FUT JRE FUTURE SOUTH BO JND LANE MEDIAN -CON NE TTOEXIST 24- RW H NEW 24'RW DI STOP FIBER ❑ TIC (TYPr FIBER ❑ IC PULLBOX a CONC D IVE (TYP) P v 10' WIDE 3TABIttZED GRASS P. KING (TYP) EXIST BL IED ELEC RELOCA ON (TBD) LANE 30 I 1 3❑ VAULT 10 I 6' FUTURE SOUTH BOUND LANE ❑ w 20 (REMAIN$}, FUTiJR 20 m C a EXIST GRADE — — y y = 10 FIBER OPTIC 10 STORM PIPE EXIST WELL iD I EXIST 24" RW-CLOT 0 N 0 D 0+00 0+20 0+4D 0+50 0+80 1+DO i SECTION A SCALE: 1"= 10' Q m y Co J �(x V LL� p v� VAULT 10 10, 15, JUL zUl IREMAiNS} GONG DRIVE o 20 20 i —� — — — z 10 EXIST GRADE STABILI7ED GRASS PARIGNG 10 ❑ y a a �g mar \- FIBER OPTIC. _ p 0 EXIST WELL 10 ❑ zz ' 0+00 G+20 D+4D 0+60 0+90 1+00 " Lu d m d SECTION a° g ; � Ny SO J Y, r � � I CL rr yy M V ¢ Lu _ 2 (n Llj U - o z C7 Lu J Q VERIFY SCALE BRR IS ONE MM ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. '��►. VAULT '10 0�r � DATE NpVEMBEl2 2021 LU ' KEY MAP [ 7 PROD 03514[}01 DWG os-G-210 D NTS SHEET ShWumnfShtTo U %%USOTSO-APP07MCS_workdi15QW1302955_11105-C-210_D3514001.dgn FILENAME: 05-C-210_D3514001.dgn PLOT DATE:1712Ir2021 PLOT TIME: 7:15: N 185' I 0 10 20 30 Y FUTURE ALE "RE FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE wl I U 8 OEWAL < SOUTH BOU LANE MEDIAN 4ORTH BOON LANE 30 Scala In Feat 5, 2 ' 20 WELL I 24" RW-CLL]I (TYP. a w FROM ROW) I 10 I g � f}p � STORM PIPE 1 FIBER OPTIC 24 RW - CLDI ' 0 0+D0 0+20 0+40 I COUNTY I UTILITY EASEMENT —EXIST N TRELEC A ) +SECTIO SCALE 1" =10' FIBEROPTIC DEMO EXI FI ER PULLBOX OPTIC P) FIBER OPTIC (TYP) NLET I DEMO ST24" -CLDI IL }M �20 z1,13' _ a IN STORM IPE I w142' I H RAILIN WELL HOUSE 11 I rr,Pr I I + FIBEf� OPTIC A _ PROPOSED GRADE {TYP} EXIS GRADE (TYP) 13 I y DEMO IST o-no 0+20 (1) 24" a• TEE - CLDI, J ra I I «'ETEVAIVE SECTION SCALE 1" = 1�' _ e � a I I I CONNE TO EXIST - — — - e• RW TH NEW 9`Rw- LDI w 4D , RW BL WOFF ASSEll LY (1) 24" W TEE - CLDI, MJ 11) 9' GATE VALVE d ' J a� CONIC t RIVE (TYP) I � III ,4I 1D'wI❑ STABILIZED Tj, GRASS ARKING (TYP) \ I I ' I I I , k 5' I P Li' � I RETAINING WALL W14r HIGH RAILING 3a fi' FUTURE SOUTH BOUND LONE 20 I a a OUSE 11 (REMAW « LITUR m A sm 0 EXIST GRADE 10 ' DEMO EXIST 24" RW-CLDI 0 0+60 o+av 1+00 1r2D DEMO EXIST DI, MJ (2) 84GATE VALVE z La N CONNECT TO EXIST a' RW WITH NEW 8" RW - CLDI p v I= m� d� 11 ELL VAULT (REMAINS) 1p' 15' IV 20 �G E CONC DRIVE ¢ C o � STABILIZED GRASS PAR30NG 10 p _ `&'RW-CLDI �— gig STORM PIPE EXIST WELL 11 ' T 0+4v 0+60 D+so s+np 1+20 � Lu a 6 w LL o5� - QWm In i v� UI o 4 w Nw 2 J J8. - r � r L�� =w � I ~ J r7 LL) U 0 Z C.3 C17 w WELL 0 HOUSE 11� Q VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE 4NCH ON . omal L DRAWING. DATE NWeMSE=R 2021 u1 KEY MAP U O PROJ D3514001 DWG 05-C-211 NTS SHEET ShWum oFq tTal U L11USOTSO-APP07MCS_warkdiM88911302989 21054-�211_133514001.dgn FILENAME 05-G211_33514001.A9n PLOT DATE 102V202 t PLOT TIME: 5:29:08 A N 0 10 20 30 Scala In Feel 1111 Fum S AL FUTUPA FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE SOI JTH BOUND U NE WAIN NORTH BOUND LANE DEW { I 1B5'RO I B I COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT I B I i I I VVAE E STABILIZED + I y FL GRA9 PARKING (TY r li s a 24" R LDI (TYP. I ' a n d 40P . CL V FROM ROW) irr o DOW RIVE [TYP] n :d n' e o 4�. [1}24' B'TEE -CLDI J ■� (1}8" EVALVE FF li J f I ASSEL LY i CONN r r0 EXIST 8" Rw i ITH NEW - I 8' RW CLDI " 7VAUL r PEMO EXIST VAULT 11. J A I B TEVALVE - - — - - — - - — - — - — - 2'MIN L DEMO IST FIBER- - - — - - — - I / OPTIC I d TYP) DEMO I XIST 24" RW . RETAIN NG WALL I w/42' GH RAILING FIBER PTIC(TYP) I FIBER C PTIC PULLSO STORM PIPE (TYP] I� I I el I ; pp EXIST RIED ELEC RELOCJ TION (TED) � e I I I I � � I I I I i I I I SPWURL WSOTSO-APP078UCS_workdirW66911302968_4L05-C-212_D3514001. dgn { 5 6 0JAC09$ 202a. ALL RIGMS NESE0.YFb. I I 30 3D RETAINING WALL i W/ 42• HIGH RAILING 1111 I VAULT 12 8' FUTURE SOUTH HOUND LANE FUTURE MEDIAN 20 Q I STORM PIPE [REMAINS} '� SIYV 20 ¢ p I" 24' RW - CLpI m c FIBER OPTIC 10 EXIST GRADE 10 �►I I DEMO EXIST o 0 24' RW-CLDI I ❑ O+DO 0+20 0+4q 0- 0.00 1.00 O I CONNECT TO EXIST DEMO EXIST i ' SECTION 8"RWvcLONEW [7]24'x8'TEE-CL[71,MJ [2] 9- CATE VALVE z SCALE r" N =o IXIST WELL 12 � V U 3O 30 p o� II w �a FUTURE SWALE 79't h5' 70' VAULT 12 x0 20 CONC DNVE (REMAINS) 20 , 't} f STABILIZED GRASS PARKING 2 tto o 10 z g PROPOSED GRAp� {TYP} FIBER OPTIC MST GRADE W RW - CLOIJ L [TYP] EXIST WELL 12 L.,0 D $o F A gsx 0,00 ❑:20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 cN w �a w O ni SECTION rn� ❑ a — - - - � SCALE 1••- t0' O � a o� w Nz g 3. " gin :I r w n I z w F I � � 2 VAULT 12- 1 VERIFY SCALE J MR IS ONE INCH ON L OF::z DikMika. — DATE NOVEMBER2021 W KEY MAP PROD 1)361400iZ ' DWG 05-C-21�212 ' NTS SHEET ShtNum of ShtT 0 FILENgME:05-G212 0357a001,dgn PLOT DATE:T212112021 PLOTTIME. 5:29:08AM $PWuK N 1 I I 7 10 20 30 I Scala In Feel i i C i 189 ROw FUTUFIIE SWALE UR I FUTURE. FUTURE I UTURE SOUTH BOUN LAME MEDIAN NORTH SOUND LANE p I IDEWAL 24" R -CLDI (TYP, ` CL W FROM ROW) x SIN f COUNTY m B UTILITY EASEMENT 15' Si =_ m 1 z:j III = 10' WI E STABILIZE i a a n a GRAS I PARKING ) STOK A PIPE (TYP) DEMO EXIST 24" Rw I a°4 a c MNC DRIVE (TYP) EXIST BURIED ELEC I o _ RELOCATION(TBO) i DEMO FIBER it � OPTIC (Typ) =16ER OPTIC -ISEAN I �ULLBOX 8.6'tIH ING WALL 7vs ww14T2'I IGH RAIL NG A AU LT � -18ER OPTIC TYP) o DEMO EXIST .I (2) 8' ATE VALVE i CONN CT TO EXIST i I 81 RW �OINEW RW BL FF r ASSE SLY I i (1)24" 8"TEE-CLDI (1) Er GATE VALVE r S I i i r r ' I NIUSUTSO-APP078VCS_workdiF'A6 R11302988_5105-C-213_D3514001.dgn FILENAME:05-C-213_D3514001.dgn PLOT DA1E:1212112021 PLOTTIME, 5:29:07AM iu D 10 20 30 3a Scal® In Feat , RETAINING WALL 14 ROW J 86 ILI W14Z' HIGH RANG , 5' FUTURE SOUTH BOUND LANE FUTURE MEDIAN WELL HOUSE 14 [REMAINS] a z FUTUR 20 c c ' I FUTU SiAL. UTU FUTU FUTURE UTURE I� SNV < DEW SOUTH BOON LANE MEDIAN NOR WUND LANE IN m P D — �` f I 16 f,Q � � � � E7(VST GRADE 10 � i STORM P{pE I I b 3 �24'RW-CLDI� d DEMO EXIST x ' FIBER OPTIC 24" RW-CLDI N 0 0 0+00 0+2A 9+40 O+�D 0+80 1+00 1+2D CONNECT TO EXIST DEMO EXIST K 'RW-CLOi 8'RW WITH NEW (1)24"x8'TEE-CLDI,MJ L 8' FROM A SECTION 11" RW - CLOI (2) 8" GATE VALVE {y SCALE: 1'= 10' g y Co g _ EXIST WELL 14 V EMO EXIST 24 \RYW\V-1ra-LDI 3 S ORM PIPE; ] 1EXIST FI ER 1C TiC (TYP) roRm INLET Pj 30 FUTU SWALE WEI 20 — — 10 FIBER OPTIC PROPOSED GRADE (TYP) R ETAINING WAL L EXIST GRADE (TYP) w 4Y HIGH RAII ING D D-no 0+20 B SECTION SCALE: 1' = 11]' - - � DEMO EXIST {1 24-x8-TEE - OLDI,MJ 8- GATE VAL E CONNECT TO ST 8' RW WITH NEV 8" RW - CLD{ Rr BLOWOFF SEMBLY (11 24^ x 8' TEE - 1, MJ [7 8' GATE VAL c . NC DRIVE ) 1 WIDE STABIL ED 14 REMAINS 10' 15' 1& SWALEE 29 � COCONICDRIVE C o � ri 10 STABILIZED GRASS P�ING7 g a• RIN - CLDI —/ EAST WELL 14 � 0 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 � Lu a 6 w LL U ¢ m QWm in 03 9 u o u- w a�i • yi1` _ 11� • � I Y � z rw 00- ° a � TW � —Az: z W U WELL a'e -I c) HOUSE 14 w Q VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE INCH ON 0MnIPu1L DRAWING 11�t- d DATE NUVEMSE=R 2021 LL! ' KEY MAP z PROJ D3514001 DWG O5-C-214 NTS V SHEET ShtNum W ShtTol 11USOTSO-APP07NCS_workdih488811302988_3105-G214 03514001.dgn FILENAME: 05-G214133514001.d9n PLOT DATE 102112021 PLOT TIME: 5:29:03 A SPWURL N 7 10 20 30 Scala In Feel I 185' ROW i FUTl1RE SWALE UTUR I FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE 18 1 j SOUTH BOUND LANE MEDIM 11RTH BOUND NE DEW 24" -CLDI (TYP, �41 CL S' ROM ROW) COUNTY UTILRY 3,75' EASEMENT 1 2 1 I T WI E STABILIZE i GRA PARKING If Pj 8 STOR A PIPE (1YP) rn CONG DRIVE 4 rf P ) n 40_ d DEMO EXIST 24'FM DLOI 1.11 f f =11� I iI i6 RETAI ING WALL 8 I s W142' IGH RAILING f _ CONN _ CT TO EXIST 8' RW NITH NEW S' RW CLDI VA i T DEMO EXIST g (1)24" 8"TEE-CLDI MJ (2) 8' ATE VALVE A I r DEMO XIST FIBER OPTIC P) FIBER OPTIC PULLSOX S STYPI 3' MIN RW BL WOFF ' ASSE LY FIBER OPTIC gyp) � (1) 74- V TEE - CLDI M 2 (1)8" C kTEVALVE EXIST I DRIED ELEC RELOC kTION (MD) I @ I I i RUS61T8 W1PP079UCS_workdir1466811302968_5165-C-215_03514001. dgn FILENAME: 05-C.215 D3514007.dgn PLOT DATE: 12/21/2021 PLOTTIME, 5:29:02AM 00 UTI FA FIRE PUL FIRE (TYF $PWURI N 0 10 20 30 1 Scala In Feel ! 165' R I ` I 1 2 FUTURE 3WALE UT(J FUTU FUTURE I FFUTURE 1 SOUTH BOUN) LANE MEDIAN NORTH BOUND LANE !s 1111DEW 1 ' I I JNTY 6 ' ! _ITY ;FMENT 2d' R -CLDI (TYP, I CL ff I ROM ROW) I ! I 1 I e STOR A PIPE (TYP) I ' I 19 Wi DE STABILIZE GRASSPARKING ) r- I I r II ! ' e DEMI EXIST 24' RW 1 f o 1 CONC DRIVE (TYP) ! T d 40a 4 1 ! n I jI I RETAI 4 ING WALL , ! w142' GH RAILING 45' , ' 1 CONK CT TO EUST li a W RW NITH NEW , B' RW CLDI , DEMO EXS7 I + 24" W TEE - CLD ! 2)) 9'ATE VALVE _ VAULr16 ! --- - -- --- - �_... - — - - - - --- - -- - - — DEMO MSTFiBER ------- R OPTIC OPTIC ' .Box I � I i OYP) 3 RW BLIDWOFF ASS EN LY R OPTIC i (1) 24' 8' TEE - CLDI M II (i] 5' TE VALVE ' EXIST URIED ELEC e RELOC kTION (MD) 1 I � I f I I I I Y I I I I I I 1 1 Mu UlWw MJtllRi3_wOrkOiF%49tia%lTW295k-T06d'216_D3514001.dgn FILENAME: 05-C-216 D3514001.dgn PLO{ DATE:12121=21 PLOT TIME, 5:29:01 AM N ,s Row FUTUS ESWALE -.UTURE FMRE UTU RE FUTURE DEWAL SOUTH 0OUNI LANE AEDIAN RTH BOUND L NE D 10 20 30 ` l 8ca1® In Feat 1V 33 'c) 1 RETAINING WALL W14r HIGH RAILING FUTURE PIG LAUNCHING FUTURE NORTH BOUND + ` v FUTURE SOUTH BOUND LANE MEDIAN LANE _ COUNTY 1 1' STATION (REMAINS] >a UTUR UTILITY _ Q S7W a EASEMENT- 4 1s h 10 EXIST GRADE DEMO EXIST STORM PIPE 24' RW-CLDI m j 0 0 ff f f �y 0,00 0-20 +4p 0+60 0+80 1+00 0 1 WIDE STABIL D 1 CONNECT TO EXIST DEMO EXIST I —I G SSPARPUN (1YP) ` A SECTION 24'RW WITH NEW (1)2CTEE -CLDI,MJ z 24^RW-CLDI 2 Y SCALE 1-= 10' H m o uy I I I EXIST WELL 37 3 ` �.CGNCDRIVE )Wo I c q ❑ IIW J o e d0' 3{] PIG 31i LAUNCHING v a WELLHEADPAD 37 TATIO _ ` (REMAINS] ( EMAIN ] FUTURE FUTURE j { 15' 19 SWALE 1s SWALE CONC DRIVE FLfTUFiE DRIVE 2� a1-i 9 _ o $' � � DE MD E)CI57 FIB R — — — — — — — — — — I — — — — — — OF IC {TYP] I 1i1 STABILIZED GRASS PARKING 1p z y � .. `` FIBER OPTIC �� EXIST WELLEXIST 37 I p g I 0111 24RW CLQI � PRDPOSED GRADE 15,d' Fil ER OPTIC D FIBER OPTIC 0 WE LHEAD BOX o•na D+20 0 0+60 o+ao 1+00 1+20 �� Lu a J W D. 37 SECTION �6 LL_ F11 ER OPTIC B < 26 } SCALE; r=1D' I I I JG R AIN4NG WAL €�W ~ w €o HIGH RAILI GPIsrLLALJNCFIISTATIOAE EXl$Tw (fl -TEE-CLDI MJ PAD37EADC ECTFQE I T- — -- --M' RW WITH NEW W RW-CLDI STORM MANHOLE ti c7 (TyP) + U RQ E 40 ExlBr 24- F w-cLDI r � � r � J �d STORM INLET (TYP] + M w Ld T wN Uj STORM PIPE TYP) ' 1 0 (T1 P) e 13 Z C7 fn ILL) h VERIFY SCALE Q BRR IS ONE ORIGINAL MiAMAWING.G. q�t CIL -FROM OWY ` DATE NOVEMBI=R 2021 uJ CL 6' FROM ROWy ,r PROJ D3514MI V KEY MAP DWG 65 C 2,7 z >z Nrs SHEET ShtNum of ShiTal 0 JRL 1iUSOTSO.APP078MCS_warkdiWW130298E_10405-C-217_63514001.dgn FILENAME: O5-C-217_D3514001.dgn PLOT DAiE:12121r2021 PLOT TIME: 5:29:04AI )- T ` 44 ,, i ! r � 0 10 50 A 'i"�M � Feet f .r t .+ Lu co In 1p . �• �, • ..11 • Yo c • r A Lu r i I u = _ �o • r > O U m W 'i' nrr � m>s / "_ o aw - - - -w(- - tat - w(,at------- W(*-----------W(*-----------wrv-- T wry- - - - - -` • -�-..wraty-_--: - - -- wrap - - - - - - -- wrap Z�° a} � 3 � ZU Q ❑ Qy o Z o =_ rr_- . I R/W LINE PROP. R/W LINES TYPE F CURB r + r �•. 00 r do t illW II • : II �•- -:•• IT Z o =o w ° w �w 00 O W Z o3 a? .o y = wy �w ° ILL! W ~o W J J ZF QZ — W U Zm m. g'a yo j �� s, — 1. o o Q Z Q _�- ' LL' a U - Y O L U t VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE INCH ON yT ORIGINAL DRAWING. DATE DECEMBER2021 oil t ` ' PROD D3514001 _ DWG DRAWING -NO - -- _ SHEET ShtNum of ShtTo $PWURL $PWPATH FILENAME. ANSI_D.dgn PLOT DATE:$PLOTDATE PLOT TIME:$PLI fN iki Sir me PROP,. RAW WATER MAIN •' COUNTY PRODUCTI +.•.' +, _ WELL HOUSE 11 ► ��+r _ _ ^PROP. RETAINING WALL ►,� — "P ROP. R/W LINE — — PROP. COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT •. � _ 6' SIDEWALK PROP. DRIVEWAY ACCESS _ PROP. DRAINAGE PIPE + EXIST. R/W LINE jer i \ EXIST. RAW WATER MAIN TYPE F CURB & GUTTER WILSON BLVD SOUTHBOUND WILSON BLVD NORTHBOUND H L 7- _ 1 i 4944- ' *1 N1••' PROP. R/W LINE 3 IMALE B OM F ]0' ATHWAY r+ •' ' �� �� - ►; _ " EXIST. R/W LINE `_ _ TYPE F CURB & GUTTERtR;'. • • ar or '4 ow NAP r � sp • r ' 41k r a ' ►• '+ •� 1 .a r it • y... Ab q6 IL « .►�rhe •. r O W i • - $PWURL $PWPATH FILENAME: ANSI_D.dgn PLOT DATE:$PLOTDATE PLOT TIME: $PLOTTIME ° LU ..�. �. _� • .. I• . I _- I • Z m a O >U o of m m- 2. -_- - ° 0 wCE � ' rc; i aw 'W . - - --`lV(At - • - - • - .�- W(At -• W(At ��41�rAt At W(At ILL! o w a <000 C I- • CI I ° `a 73 74 75 76 Z U) =_ wa �10 zz ~ a zo w ° 1w WILSON i NORTHBOUND w o 00 _ - O >LL o� N 3 O jo .,�� =♦•TF • � r T T"�- ...ice r � _ _ .. I tir ! I . • I I r 1• _ I 00 tRBGUTAF + ti y � 1 r ► ! # -� O - •� 7 ; *•• � y � Ir•y}tom Q O z V J H Lu D its ■ - r VERIFY SCALE }. f ■ lr ~ ` - v - V lI BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING, DATE DECEMBER 2021 1 PROJ D3514001 �. ■` L' DWG DRAWING -NO SHEET Sht of ShtTo $PWURL $PWPATH FILENAME. ANSI_D.dgn PLOT DATE.$PLOTDATE PLOT TIME:$PLO eIr- r r .s 10 10 I + • z •••• • . I I y tK 5�� ••I• • Yo I I W Lu W � • : I • • • • • I I • I • • I • I I O o0 O Y w� ,y •I • I N= yo i Lu U O mi oz 0, w w 1. ... Z --........fto - ----- --- --W(A} -- -- - - ---- -W(V ---- - -- --W(A} (A} W(A} A}------W(A} -�iV(A} - -- - - - -- - - -W(A}-- - - - -- -- - -W(A)L - -- - - ------W(* - - - - W Wow ¢ ° ao 1 i1 I ° 78 79 82 83 84 0 wwo N Z° o Q p10 0a H ¢ ZO Z ° yw I I I I• I/ I _ 0 DO Lu _ — - A i _�� IC- _ • - _ g ° o W ILL!00 �. LL W Z- J J ¢Z W wm. 8z< - --� 3 U O - - — - - - -- _ - - — - -� yo f - .,I� ri .,f y r zw ti !' o • �A i • � ' I'l K - Lo ■ Q ? �O o Q z Lu Lu i - •ti r 1 z p * i At C) VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. 0 DATE DECEMBER 2021 r PROD D3514001 DWG DRAWING -NO SHEET ShtNum of ShtTo $PWURL $PWPATH FILENAME: ANSI_D.dgn PLOT DATE. SPLOTDATE PLOT TIME: $PLI pw 0 10 50't - 1 Feet r •t Lu •• 1• �• I I • • 1 1 I 1 - m �'r o I • ■ ■ 1 ■ I �. ■ 3 • • Y o ■ ■ 1 • ■ I I + } + w ■ ■ _ ■ ■ 1 ■ . ■ I I PROP ■ ,P U 0o •■ 1■ I I I • I ► ' 0 Y m •I I • I ■■ • ■ N= �o • •� I > U _ af _ - m >S - Q= ❑ OZ o� WEW ���►�(AW(A}-----------W(V...-. ....ww. ❑�wo - 4W(A} — - z �= • - - - W(A} - - - - - -W( Q WWIL-SZU F• _ _ ¢ ❑ ¢O 1 I SOUTHBOUND IL Qa 4 95 a 97 9 6 , �o Z 0 iZ w< M 10 0a zz ~ ¢ zo z o 10 WILSON BLVD NORTHBOUNDw 00 00 --fir 0 oz U � ❑ � m W a. o OF ■ — J J QO 2 W Q 2 tq 3 U m. PROP. R/W t�VE SWALE BOTTOM y�. - 10' PATJ4VAY I TYPE F CURB & GUTTER IjW • ti i° r• - +in lop .l ► r :• C ;N A ` r..► � _r � jr } i t rp __ r-ok Kl• r �1wF i r �- _ �® `,' Al r• r, � v y i • to w - ' 111111� ' 111111� r TNTY UTILITY EAS• �+ y. --WAY ACCESS PE F CURB & GUTTER PROP. R/W LINE..• allile. +1E • SW E BOTTOMEXIST. R/W Li RO R/W ,A TYPE GUTTER 10' PATHWAY i I lip ' �� J k • �A 156 Z o 1w w E y 2 O o0 > 03 LL Q2 .� .o = Z wy LL Lu 2F w J Qp Z Q WN U m❑ yo _ O • w IIJ Lu n 0 r� U ] PIC� �• % w t � VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE INCH ON . • - ! ORIGINAL DRAWING, 0-1" DATE DECEMBER2021 ~ PROJ D3514001 • '� r _ _ DWG DRAWING -NO SHEET ShtNum of ShtTo $PWURL $PWPATH FILENAME: ANSI_D.dgn PLOT DATE: $PLOTDATE PLOT TIME: $PL( Appendix I Public Involvement Backup Appendix 1.1 Meeting Notifications ELECTED OFFICIALS: chris.sweetc( mai1.house. gov; rod rigues.ray.weba(-�flsenate.gov; passidomo.kathleen.web(oflsenate.gov; lauren.melo(omyfloridahouse.gov; crystal.kinzel c-�clerk.collier.fl.us; Rick. LoCastro(ocolliercountyfl.gov; Aixa.Capizzi c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Andy.Sol is(ocolliercountyfl.gov; Angela. Good ner c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Burt.Saunders(ocolliercountyfl.gov; Dave. Lykinsc( colliercountyfl.gov; Penny.Taylorc( colliercountyfl.gov; Sherry. Grecoj( col Iiercountyfl.gov; Bill. McDaniel a( colliercountyfl.gov; Sue. Filson a( colliercountyfl.gov; webinfo(�collierappraiser.com; Su pervisorOfElections(a�CollierCountyfl.Gov; WestbeJo @collierschools.com; lucarsj( collierschools.com; mitchi3j( collierschools.com; cartee1 ancollierschools.com; terryroa(�.collierschools.com; sheriff(c)_colliersheriff.org; Undeliverable (resent on October 20, 2021): crystal. kinzela( Clerk.collier.fl.us-, AGENCIES: john_tupy c-�fws.gov; Portia. Sapp c(�freshfromflorida.com; AESCares(g-�FDACS.gov; barbara.powell(@deo.mvflorida.com; samantha.browne(a-�dep.state.fl.us; Kali na.Warren(a-�Florida DEP.gov; Jon. lglehart(@FloridaDEP.gov; Megan.Mills(a-�FloridaDEP.gov; terry.gilbert(@myfwc.com; All ie.McCue(@MyFWC.com; lohn_wrublik(a-�fws.gov; mparrott(@sfwmd.gov; briackso c-�sfwmd.gov; annemullins(@semtribe.com; Gwen. Pipkin a( dot.state.fl.us; Lauren. Peters a( dot.state.fl.us; Christopher.Simpron i( dot.state.fl.us; Victoria. Petersa(�dot.state.fl.us; Richard.Ouievolki( dot.state.fl.us; Jonathon. Bennett a( dot.state.fl.us; APPOINTED: Mark.lsacksonj( colliercountyfl.gov;Sean. Cal lahanj( col Iiercountyfl.gov; Amy. Patterson a(kolIiercountyfl.gov; James. French 6a colliercountyfl.gov; trinity.scott c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Jaime.Cook a( colliercountyfl.gov; Ken. Kovensky(@colliercountyfl.gov; Michael. Bosi c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Matthew. Mclean(@colliercountyfl.gov; Lorraine. Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov; Michael. Sawyer(cDcol I iercou ntyfl. gov; robert.wiley cDcolliercountyfl.gov; Gene. Shue(@colliercount)fl.gov; Gerald. Kurtz(cDcolliercountyfl.gov; Jay.Ahmad c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Marlene. Messam(@colliercountyfl.gov; Robert. Bosch c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Steve.Ritterc-�colliercountyfl.gov; Anthony. Khawala(@colliercountyfl.gov; Pamela.Wilson(@colliercountyfl.gov; George.Yilmaz(@Colliercountyfl.gov; Tom.Chmeliki( colliercountyfl.gov; Tom.sivertj( col I iercou ntyfl. gov; Kari.Hodgson C@col Iiercountyfl.gov; Steve. Messnera()colliercountyfl.gov; Beth.Johnssen a( colliercountyfl.gov; Jack.McKennaj( colliercountyfl.gov; Cormac.Giblini( colliercountyfl.gov; alicia.humph riesj( col Iiercountyfl.gov; brett.rosenblumi( colliercountyfl.gov; kirsten.wilkie a( colliercountyfl.gov; Dan.Summersi( colliercountyfl.gov; Tabitha.Butcher(o)colliercountyfl.gov; John. Mullins aa0lliercountyfl.gov; deborah.curryi( colliercountyfl.gov; Connie. Deane a( colliercountyfl.gov; Heather.Meyerj( colliercountyfl.gov; eastmath a()collierschools.com; oliver a( collierschools.com; Daniel. Rod rig uez(ocolIiercountyfl.gov; Kimberley.Grant(a�colliercountyfl.gov; Barry.Williams(o.colliercountyfl.gov; Michelle.Arnold c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Twyla.Leigh(o)colliercountyfl.gov; Karen. Homiak c-�colliercountyfl.gov; christopher.vernon(o)colliercountyfl.gov; karl.frV(o)colliercountyfl.gov; EdwinFryerc-�colliergov.net; robert.klucik c-�colliercountyfl.gov; JosephSchmitt(o)colliergov.net; paul.shea c-�colliercountyfl•gov; Ray. Bel lows c( col liercountyfl.gov; nsapp(c�gnfire.orq; mwuerstle c-�swfrpc.orq; michael c-�napleschamber.orq; Anne. McLaughlin colliercountyfl.gov; Brandy. Otero c-�colliercountyfl.gov; Thad. Rhodes c-�colliersheriff.org; Undeliverable (resent on October 20, 2021): Daniel.Rodriquez(@,colliercountyfl.gov; Dan.Summers(@colliercountvfl.gov; Tabitha.Butcher(@colliercountyfl.gov; Ken. Kovensky(o)colliercountyfl.gov INTERESTED PARTIES: michael.mcgrath a( sierraclub.org; audubon. southwest.florida a()gmai1.com; mwolok a( audubonwe.org; 0wraith mell a audubon.org; fta j( floridatrail.org; hikerdavid j( outlook.com; efleming j( defenders.org; southeastoffice a(�defenders.org; fran.perch ick aatnc.org; florida j( tnc.org; friends aa1000fof.org; info j( collierenterprises.com; robm aaconservancy.org; secretary a(�goldengateisgreat.com; Michael. R.Ramseyj( embargmail.com; dckeneipp a()hotmail.com; adriana62191 j(yahoo.com; From: LantzLorraine Subject: [EXTERNAL] Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Date: Thursday, October 7, 2021 4:03:49 PM Attachments: Wilson Blvd Widening Public Information Meeting Newsletter Oct2021.pdf Dear Elected Official: Collier County will hold a public information meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study (from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) on Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021 at the University of Florida/IFAS Extension Office (Multipurpose Room), 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120. The meeting will be an open house format from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. The meeting will be conducted in an informal, open house setting with no formal presentation. The study team will be available during the meeting to answer your questions. The purpose of this meeting is to provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on the project alternatives. Attached is the public information meeting newsletter, which includes a location map for the meeting, project limits and other important information. This newsletter is being sent to all property owners located within 500 feet of the project limits, as well as other public officials, agencies, and other interested parties. With the Centers for Disease Control recommendations for social distancing in mind, a limited number of people will be able to enter the meeting room at one time (approximately 30). It is recommended that everyone attending the meeting in person, wear a face mask to prevent the spread of COVID-19. As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, you can view the meeting displays and handouts posted on the county's website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current - Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") beginning Oct. 20, 2021, one week prior to the meeting. Comment cards will be available in both digital (online/project website) and paper (at the meeting) formats. Comments may also be sent via email to Connie Deane at Connie. Deane&colliercountyfl.gov. Your input is very important, and we encourage you to either review the latest project information on the county's website or attend the public information meeting. The public comment period will end Nov. 5, 2021. Collier County looks forward to keeping you informed as we progress through this project. If you have any comments or questions, please contact me at Lorraine. LantzQcolliercountyfl.gov or by phone at (239) 252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Attachments: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting Newsletter CoiLie-v C014*1ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine, Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. NEWSLETTER #1 Wilson qule alyd Widening Corridor Study Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane (existing) to a four -lane roadway with curb and gutter, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). The study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements (addition of bus stop pads, etc.). Additional project elements include intersection access changes, drainage system upgrades, existing bridge replacement, utility relocations, and right-of-way acquisition. YOU'RE INVITED IM Collier County invites you to participate in the upcoming 27 Public Information Meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study. The public meeting will be held 0on Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Univer ' 'ce, Mulitpurpose Room, 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, F 34120. The purpose of thisLOCATION meeting is to provide the publi Wed s sday, actpp27, 2021 m. with an opportunity to revie University of Florida! and comment on the projec IFAS Extension Office alternatives. The meetingwill be Multi urpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road conducted in an informal, open Naples, FL 34120 house setting with no formal presentation. The study team will be available during the meeting to answer your questions. With it11 MOKAI_EE RD the Centers for Disease Control recommendations for social — 'P. distancing in mind, a limited = number of people will be able to enter the meeting room a ' GOLDEN GATE BLVI one time (approximately 30 people). It is recommended tha everyone attending the meeting In person, wear a tace mas o preven the spread of COVID-19. As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, you can view the meeting displays and handouts posted on the county's website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") beginning Oct. 20, 2021. Your input is very important, and we encourage you to either review the latest project information on the county's website or attend the public information meeting. Either way, please share your comments. Comment cards will be available in both digital (online) and paper (at the meeting) formats. The public comment period will end Nov. 5, 2021. in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded with the design and right-of-way acquisition phases scheduled to begin during Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, and the construction phase in FY 2024. El condado de Collier esta Ilevando a Cabo el Estudio del corredor de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard para evaluar las alternativas para ampliar Wilson Boulevard de una carretera de 2 carriles (existente) a una de 4 carriles con acera y cuneta, entre Golden Gate Boulevard y Immokalee Road (aproximadamente 3.2 millas). El estudio incluye la evaluacion de alineaciones alternativas para mejorar la movilidad, mejorar la seguridad y acomodar los volumenes de trafico futuros, mientras se evita o minimiza los impactos a la comunidad y al medio ambiente. Las mejoras propuestas tambien incluyen la adicion de aceras, un Camino de use compartido y carriles para bicicletas para mejorar la movilidad multimodal, asi como mejoras en las paradas de autobus (adicion de almohadillas de la parada de autobus, etc.). Los elementos adicionales del proyecto incluyen cambios en el acceso en las intersecciones, mejoras al sistema de drenaje, reemplazo del puente existente, reubicacion de servicios pOblicos y adquisicion de derecho de paso. ESTAN INVITADOS El condado de Collier to invita a participar en la proxima Reunion de Informacion Publica para el Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard. La publica reunion se Ilevara a Cabo el miercoles, 27 de octubre de 2021, a partir de las 5 p.m. hasta las 7 o.m. en la Extension OF / IFAS en 14700 Immokalee Road en Naples, FL 34120. El proposito de esta reunion es brindarle al publico la oportunidad de revisar y comentar sobre las alternativas �— del proyecto. La reunion se Ilevara a Cabo en un ambiente informal de puertas abiertas sin a presentacion formal. El equipo de estudio estara disponible OIL WELL Rt} durante la reunion para responder a sus preguntas. RANDALL BLVD Con las recomendaciones de los Centros para el Control STUDY T de Enfermedades y el AREA Departamento de Salud para el dlstanciamiento social en l — mente, un numero limitado de personas podra ingresar a la sala de reuniones a la yez (aproximadamente 30 personas). Se recomienda que todas las personas que asistan a la reunion en persona usen una mascarilla para evitar la propagacion de COVID-19. Como alternativa a asistir a la reunion en persona, las exhibiciones y los folletos de la reunion se publicaran en el sitio web del condado en www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (en "Actual - Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de Wilson Blvd.") a partir del 20 de octubre de 2021. Formularios de comentarios estaran disponibles en la Reunion de Informacion Publica, asi como en el sitio web del condado. Su opinion es muy importante y Io alentamos a que revises la informacion mas reciente del proyecto en el sitio web del condado o asista a la Reunion de Informacion Publica. De cualquier manera, comparta sus comentarios. El periodo de comentarios pOblicos finalizara el 5 de noviembre de 2021. C.ALCNUAKIV UtL rKVTCC.IV be preve que este tstualo se completara en diciembre de 2021 y se presentara ante la Junta de Comisionados del Condado a fines de 2021 o principios de 2022 para su aprobacion. El proyecto esta financiado actualmente en el Plan de Mejoramiento del Transporte de la Organizacion de Planificacion Metropolitana de Collier con las fases de diseno y adquisicion de derechos de paso que comenzaran durante el ano fiscal 2021, y la fase de construccion en el ano fiscal 2024. www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current - Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") Co ier County Project Manager, Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT One of the most important aspects of a study is public involvement. It is very important for you to be able to provide your comments related to the proposed improvements. We use a variety of methods for you to stay involved in the process such as public meetings, small group meetings, and a project website. In addition, Collier County mails notifications to all property owners within the study area as well as to agencies and local officials prior to the public meeting. PROJECT CONTACT We encourage you to participate in the Wilson Boulevard Widenin Corridor Study and invite your questions and commenils. If you have questions regarding the project, please contact: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Lorraine Lantz, Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite # 103 Naples, FL 34104 PARTICIPACION PUBLICA Uno de los aspectos mas importantes del estudio es la participacion publica. Es muy importante que ustedes puedan aportar sus comentarios sobre las mejoras propuestas. Se usaran una variedad de met000s para que ustedes sigan participando en el proyecto, tal como reuniones publicas, reuniones en grupos pequenos y en un sitio web del proyecto. Adicionalmente, el Condado de Collier enviara por correo notificaciones a todos los duenos de propiedades dentro del area de estudio y a las agencias y funcionarios locales antes de las reuniones publicas. CONTACTO DEL PROYECTO Los invitamos a pp�a�rticipar en el Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de 1Nilson Boulevard y a hacernos Ilegar sus preguntas y comentarios. Si tienen alguna pre unta relacionada con el proyecto, por favor pongase en conlacto con: Phone (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFl.gov Two or more members of the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) may be present and participate at this meeting. The subject matter of this meeting may be an item for discussion and action at a future BCC meeting. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or other reasonable accommodations to participate in this proceeding, should contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112, or 239-252-8380 as soon as possible. Such reasonable accommodations will be provided at no cost to the individual. Dos o mas miembros de la Junta de Comisionados del Condado (BCC, por sus siglas en ingles) pueden estar presentes y participar en esta reunion. El tema de esta reunion puede ser un tema de discusion y accion en una futura reunion del BCC. Cualquier persona que requiera ayuda o servicio auxiliar para tener comunicacion eficaz, u otras adaptaciones razonables para participar en este procedimiento, debe comunicarse con la Division de Administracion de Instalaciones del Condado de Collier ubicada en 3335 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112, 6 239-252-8380 como tan pronto como sea posible. Tales adaptaciones razonables se proporcionaran sin costo alguno para el individuo. From: LantzLorraine Subject: [EXTERNAL] Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Date: Thursday, October 7, 2021 4:07:37 PM Attachments: Wilson Blvd Widening Public Information Meetina Newsletter Oct2021.ndf Dear Government/Agency Partner Collier County will hold a public information meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study (from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) on Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021 at the University of Florida/IFAS Extension Office (Multipurpose Room), 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120. The meeting will be an open house format from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. The meeting will be conducted in an informal, open house setting with no formal presentation. The study team will be available during the meeting to answer your questions. The purpose of this meeting is to provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on the project alternatives. Attached is the public information meeting newsletter, which includes a location map for the meeting, project limits and other important information. This newsletter is being sent to all property owners located within 500 feet of the project limits, as well as public officials, agencies, and other interested parties. With the Centers for Disease Control recommendations for social distancing in mind, a limited number of people will be able to enter the meeting room at one time (approximately 30). It is recommended that everyone attending the meeting in person, wear a face mask to prevent the spread of COVID-19. As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, you can view the meeting displays and handouts posted on the county's website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current - Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") beginning Oct. 20, 2021, one week prior to the meeting. Comment cards will be available in both digital (online/project website) and paper (at the meeting) formats. Comments may also be sent via email to Connie Deane at Connie. Deane&colliercountyfl.gov. Your input is very important, and we encourage you to either review the latest project information on the county's website or attend the public information meeting. The public comment period will end Nov. 5, 2021. Collier County looks forward to keeping you informed as we progress through this project. If you have any comments or questions, please contact me at Lorraine. Lantz&colliercountyfl.gov or by phone at (239) 252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Attachments: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting Newsletter CO;? PY C l . y Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine Subject: [EXTERNAL] Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Date: Thursday, October 7, 2021 4:11:51 PM Attachments: Wilson Blvd Widening Public Information Meeting Newsletter Oct2021.pdf Collier County will hold a public information meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study (from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) on Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021 at the University of Florida/IFAS Extension Office (Multipurpose Room), 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120. The meeting will be an open house format from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. The meeting will be conducted in an informal, open house setting with no formal presentation. The study team will be available during the meeting to answer your questions. The purpose of this meeting is to provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on the project alternatives. Attached is the public information meeting newsletter, which includes a location map for the meeting, project limits and other important information. This newsletter is being sent to all property owners located within 500 feet of the project limits, as well as other public officials, agencies, and other interested parties. With the Centers for Disease Control recommendations for social distancing in mind, a limited number of people will be able to enter the meeting room at one time (approximately 30). It is recommended that everyone attending the meeting in person, wear a face mask to prevent the spread of COVID-19. As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, you can view the meeting displays and handouts posted on the county's website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current - Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") beginning Oct. 20, 2021, one week prior to the meeting. Comment cards will be available in both digital (online/project website) and paper (at the meeting) formats. Comments may also be sent via email to Connie Deane at Connie. Deane&colliercountyfl.gov. Your input is very important, and we encourage you to either review the latest project information on the county's website or attend the public information meeting. The public comment period will end Nov. 5, 2021. Collier County looks forward to keeping you informed as we progress through this project. If you have any comments or questions, please contact me at Lorraine. Lantz&colliercountyfl.gov or by phone at (239) 252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Attachments: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting Newsletter v C I 4Z�y Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. CO*er C014nty Project Manager, Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 ROSS, COLLEEN OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9077 PALOS VERDE DRIVE ORLANDO, FL 32825 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT One of the most important aspects of a study is public involvement. It is very important for you to be able to provide your comments related to the proposed improvements. We use a variety of methods for you to stay involved in the process such as public meetings, small group meetings, and a project website. In addition, Coilier County mails notifications to all property owners within the study area as well as to agencies and local officials prior to the public meeting. OFZLAN[O F1, 31 Y s LISA roll-ll-I,I1I... ili" Ili II-IIIII IIi01111[-I>>AiN,11ja-44,Ih r PARTICIPACION POBLICA Uno de los aspectos mas importantes del estudio es la participaci6n publica. Es muy importante que ustedes puedan aportar sus comentanos sabre las mejoras propuestas. Se usaran una variedad de met000s para que ustedes sigan participando en el proyecto, tal como reunlones public—vreuniones en grupos pequenos y en Lin sitio web del proyecto. Adicionalmente, el Condado de Collier enviara por correor-notificaciones a todos los duenos de propiedades dentro del yea de estudio y a las agencies y funcionarios locales antes (1p, las reuniones piiblicas. PROJECT CONTACT CONTACTC )EL PROYECTO VVe encourage you to participate in the VViison Boulevard Los invitamos a wrticipar en el Estudio del corredor Widenin Corridor Study and invite your questions and de ampliaci6n de Wilson Boulevard y a hacernos Ilegar commenils. If you have questions regarding the project, sus preguntas y ccrmentarios. Si tienen alguna pre unta please contact: relaclonada con el proyecto, por favor p6ngase en contacto con: Wilson Boulevard widening Corridor Study Lorraine Lantz, Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite # 103 Maples, FL 34104 Phone (239) 252-5779 Lorrciine.Lontz@CollierCountyFl.gov Two or more members of the Board of County Commissioners fBCC] may be present and participate at this meeting- The subject matter of this meeting may be an item for discussion and action at a future BCC meeting. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or other reasonable accommodations to participate in �' this proceeding, should contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiam+' Trail E., Naples- Florida 34112. or 239-252-8384 as soon as possible. ,f Such reasonable accommodations will be provided at no cost to the individual. Dos o mas miembros de la Junta de Comisionados del Condado (BCC por sus sigies en ingies) pueden estar presentes y partic+par an esta reuni6n. El tema de esta reunionpuede set un tema de discusi6n y action en una future reuni6n del BCC- Cualquier persona que requiem ayuda o servic+o aux+liar Para terser comunicaci6n eficar, u otras adaptaciones raronabfes para part+crpar an este procedimlento, debe comunicarse con is Divisi6n de Administracr'6n de lnstalaciones del Condado de Collier ubicada en 3335 Tamiami Trail E. !Naples. Florida 34112. 6 239-252-8380 como tan pronto como sea posible. Tales adaptaciones razonables se proporcionaran sin costo alguno parolel individuo- l4i son Boulevard Widening Corridor Study ❑ ober 202 Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane (existing) to a four -lane roadway with curb and gutter, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). The study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility. enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks. a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodai mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements (addition of bus stop pads, etc.). Additional project elements include intersection access changes, drainage system upgrades, existing bridge replacement, utility relocations, and right-of-way acquisition. YOU'RE INVITED �� Collier County invites you to participate in the upcoming 27 Public Information Meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study. The public meeting will be held I n Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the University of FloddallFAS Extension Office, Mulitpurpose Room, 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples. FL 34120. The purpose of thisLOCATION meeting is to provide the public Wednesday, p.m. to o7t..m zort with an opportunity to review University of Frio iaal and comment on the project IFAS Extension Office alternatives. The meetingwill be Multippurpose Room Road 1470fl Immokalee Rvad conducted in an informal, open Naples, FL 34120 house setting with no formal presentation. The study team will be available during the meeting to answer your questions. With LEE RD the Centers for Disease Control recommendations for social distancing in mind, a limited number of people will be able ` to enter the meeting room at f GOLDEN GATE PL one time (approximately 30 people). It is recommended that - everyone attending the meeting in person, wear a face mask to prevent the spread of COVID-19, As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, you can view the meeting displays and handouts posted on the county's website at www.colliercountZ[.gov/planningst (under "Current — Wilson Blvd, Widening Corridor Study") beginning Oct. 20, 2021. Your input is very important, and we encourage you to either review the latest project information on the county's website or attend the public information meeting. Either way, please share your comments. Comment cards will be available in both digital (online) and paper (at the meeting) formats. _ ?'le public comment period will end Nov. 5, 2021. PROJECT SCHEDULE This study is anticipated to be complete in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded with the design and right-of-way acquisition phases scheduled to be in during Fiscal Year (TY) 2021, and the construction phase in FY 2024, El condado de Collier esta Ilevando a Cabo el Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard Para evaluar las alternatives Para ampllar Wilson Boulevard de una carretera de 2 carriles (existents) a una de 4 carriles con acera y cuneta, entre Golden Gate Boulevard y Immokalee Road (aproximadamente 3.2 millas). -El estudio incluye la evaluation de alineaclones alternatives Para mejorar la movilidad, mejorar la seguridad y acomodar los voUmenes de trahco futuros. mientras se evita o minimlza los impactos a la comunidad y al media ambiente. Las mejoras propuestas tambien incluyen la adlclon de aceras, un camino de use compartldo y carrites Para bcicletas para _--� mejorar la movilidad multimodal, asi como meioras en las paradas de autobus (adicion de almohadillas de la parada de autobus, etc.). Los elementos adicionales del proyecto incluyen cambios en el acceso en las intersecciones, meioras al sistema de drenale, reemplazo del Puente existente, reublcacion de servicios publicos y adquislclon de derecho de paso. ESTAN INVITADO El condado de Collier to invita a participar en la pr6xima Reunion de Informaci6n Publica Para el Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard. La publica reunion se llevara a cabo el rni6rcoles, 27 de octubre de 2021, a partir de las 5 p.m. hasty las 7 p.m. en la Extension OF I IFAS en 14700 Immokalee Road en Naples, FL 34120. El prop6sito de esta reunion es bnndarle al publlco el la oportunidad de revisar y comentar sobre las alternativas del proyecto. La reuni6n se llevara a cabo en un ambiente informal de puertas abiertas sin presentaci6n formal. El equipo rip estudio estara disponibie durante la reunion Para ZI OIL WELL RD responder a sus preguntas. RANDALL BLVD Con las recomendaciones de los Centros Para el Control STUDY de Enfermedades y el AREADepartamento de Salud Para el distanciamiento social en mente, un numeeo limitado de personas podra ingresar a la sala de reuniones a la vet (aproximadamente 30 personas). Se recomien a que todas las personas que asistan a la reunion en persona usen una mascarilla para evitar la propagaci6n de rnvin.iq Como ahemativa a asistir a la reunion en persona, las exmiclones y los folletos de la reunion se publicaran en el sitio web del condado en www.calliercoun ovl lannin studies (en "Actual - Estudio del corredor de ampliacion de Wilson Blvd.') a partir del 20 de octubre de 2021. Formularlos de comentarios estaran disponibles en la Reunion de Informacion Publica. asi como en el sitio web del condado. Su opinion es muy importante y to alentamos a que revises la information mas reciente del proyecto en el sitio web del condado o asista a la Reunion de informaci6n Publica. De cualquier manera, comparta sus comentarios. El pperiodo de comentarios pubiicos finalizara el 5 de noviembre de 2021. CALENDARIO DEL PROYECTO Se preve que este Estudio se completara en didembre de 2021 y se presentara ante la Junta de Comisionados del Condado a fines de 2021 o principios de 2022 Para su aprobacion. El pproyecto esta financiado actualmente en el Plan de Mejoramiento del Transporte de la Organizaci6n de Planificaci6n Metropolitana de Collier con las Eases de diseno y adquisicion de derechos de paso que comenzaran durante el ano fiscal 2021. y la fase de construction en el ano fiscal 2024. www.colliercounty l-govlDlanning s— under "Current — Wilson Blvd, Widening Corridor Study") 11 /16/21, 11:41 AM Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL Planning Projects and Studies CURRENT PLANNING STUDIES Current Planning Studies Wilson Blvd. Corridor Study_ - This project proposes to widen Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles), from a 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. The Study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvers also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimod mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements. Information on this Study can be found under the "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study" tab. CURRENT - WILSON BLVD. CORRIDOR STUDY Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study This project proposes to widen Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles), from a 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. The Study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies 1 /7 11 /16/21, 11:41 AM Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements. Additional project elements include changes to access at the intersections, upgrades to the drainage system, replacement of the existing bridge, relocation of utilities and acquisition of right-of-way. Project Study Area Map https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies 2/7 11 /16/21, 11:41 AM Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL Public Information Meeting Collier County held a Public Information Meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study (from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) on Wednesday, October 27, 2021. The information provided during the meeting and available on displays is located below. Project Newsletter Project Location Map Display Project Needs and Benefits Display Existing and Proposed Typical Section Display Wilson Blvd. Display 1(South Section - Golden Gate Blvd. to north of 12th Ave. NW) Wilson Blvd. Display 2 (North Section - Immokalee Rd. to south of 14th Ave. NW) Survey. and Comment Form - Available until November 5, 2021. Once the public comment period ends on November 5, 2021, all public comments will be considered, incorporated into the project and/or addressed accordingly. All comments received will be included in the final Corridor Study documents and become part of the public record. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies 3/7 11 /16/21, 11:41 AM Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL All public comments will be considered when developing the final study and recommendations for the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The final recommendations will be presented to the BCC in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. Project Next Steps After the receipt of all public comments, the project concepts and documents will be updated to reflect public input, and the finalized recommendations will be submitted to the BCC for approval. Once approved, the Corridor Study planning phase of the project is complete. The next phases that follow are the project design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded starting in Fiscal Year 2021. Funding for the construction phase is expected to be available beginning in 2024. For additional information regarding this study, or to receive an invitation to these virtual meetings, please contact Lorraine Lantz at (239) 252-5779 or in writing at Lorraine. Lantz@ CollierCountyFL.gov PAST PLANNING STUDIES PAST - IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY (2021) PAST - EAST OF CR-951 BRIDGE RE-EVALUATION STUDY (2021) PAST - GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY - COMPLETE STREET STUDY (2021) https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies 4/7 11/16/21, 11:41 AM Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL PAST - RANDALL BLVDJOIL WELL RD. CORRIDOR STUDY (2019) PAST - PINE RIDGE RD. CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY (2018) PAST - CR 951 EXTENSION PD & E STUDY (2005) PAST - EAST OF CR 951 BRIDGE STUDY (2008) PAST - GREEN BLVD EXTENSION (2006) PAST - 1-75/EVERGLADES BLVD INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION REPORT (2013) PAST - MASTER MOBILITY PLAN (2011) PAST - NORTHEAST COLLIER COUNTY TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY (2008) PAST - TRIANGLE BLVD. STUDY (2017) PAST - VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXTENSION (2006) PAST - VANDERBILT DRIVE (2005) PAST - VANDERBILT DRIVE PATHWAY STUDY (2012) https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies 5/7 11 /16/21, 11:41 AM Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL PAST - WILSON BLVD EXTENSION (NORTH BELLE MEADE AREA) (2005) PAST - WILSON BLVD./BENFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY (2010) PAST - WHIPPOORWILL LANE AND MARBELLA LAKES DR. INTERCONNECTION STUDY Transportation planning is the process of defining future policies, goals and infrastructure designs to prepare for future needs to move people and goods to destinations. Collier County plans for multi -modes of transportation facilities including local roads, highways, sidewalks, bike lanes, and transit. Transportation planning is about providing a safe, cost effective, and functional transportation system for all residents and visitors to County by balancing access and mobility needs. Functions of Transportation Planning include: • Provide public information and assistance • Administration and implementation of the comprehensive plan • Responsible for special projects • Coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation on transportation related decisions • Administration and implementation of transportation grants In order to make informed decisions about transportation, Transportation Planners study many aspects of a corridor or facility before any construction project is implemented. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies 6/7 11/16/21, 11:41 AM Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL C n&er Count y Growth Management Department Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Project Management Capital Project Planning Building 2685 Horseshoe Drive S, Suite 103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-8192 Updated o6/24/2019 https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies 7/7 10/29/21, 10:23 AM & Wilson Boulevard Widening... - Collier County, Florida I Facebook 1�i Collier County, Florida * October 20 at 12:51 PM • la L Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting — Wed., Oct. 27 at 5 p.m. L If you live or commute on Wilson Boulevard (between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road) you won't want to miss this public meeting— The Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study is evaluating alternatives to widen the roadway from two -lanes (existing) to four -lanes. To learn more about the study visit https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current —Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study"). If you aren't able to attend the meeting, please review the project information online and give us your feedback! The meeting displays and handouts are available online, as well as an electronic comment card. #CollierCounty Vednesday, Oct- 27, 2021 5 P.M. to 7 pp.m. University of Floridai - IFAS Extension Office —_ Multipurpose Room 14700 lmmokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 A .0 A GOLDEN GAFt OM I+I ' 0 i 23 7 Comments 26 Shares r,> Share All Comments - Maggie Bourbon You should consider either also doing it via zoom, or at least recording the meeting to add to youtube. It will allow more residents to get the information. 1w 02 Cj Fowes Widening Wilson? How is this going to improve traffic flow? If it went thru to Bonita Springs than I can see the widening. But from Immokalee rd. to the blvd.? It's a short ride.. What a waste of $$. 1w C)3 Lynne Nichols Scheiner How bout limiting the density here in the Estates? Not gonna happen. Developers develop, See more of Collier County, Florida on Facebook or Privacy Terms - Advertising - Ad Choices> Cookies More - Facebook © 2021 https://www.facebook.com/ColIierGov/posts/239201408251 605 1 /2 10/29/21, 10:23 AM Q Wilson Boulevard Widening... - Collier County, Florida I Facebook wnere to go next! i nis is sucn great weatner± r. (4) Tony Ve I MOVED FROM HOLLYWOOD IN 98 GREW UP THERE AND MY FATHER AND I BUILT A HOUSE OFF OF DESOTO IN 79-80 ISH I STILL OWN A PIECE OF LAND ON 18TH AND DESOTO. MY EYES POP OUT EVERYTIME I PASS THROUGH. MISS WHAT IT WAS BUT KNOW WHERE ITS GOING. I LIVE IN GA NOW 1w 1i Rinaldo Nearanjan That will not really help with the traffic. We need ►r another Road get access to 75. Why not make Everglades Blv a 4 lain road, so it can get approve. Instead put it off until 2040. Build bridges from 10 street to 11 street to lead back on the golden gate blv, don't make no sense. or from 60 st to 40 st onto Everglades Boulevard. It all lead back to golden gate blv. 6d 01 See more of Collier County, Florida on Facebook or Privacy Terms - Advertising - Ad Choices[> Cookies More - Facebook © 2021 https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/239201408251605 2/2 10/29/21, 10:40 AM (3)Facebook N Collier County, Florida October 27 at 9:02 AM Q 2 1 + p a #ICYMI: Don't forget tonight's meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study at 5PM! We will be showing the project concepts to widen the roadway from two -lanes (existing) to four -lanes. ITo learn more about the study, visit https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study"). If aren't able to attend tonight's meeting, the meeting displays and handouts are available online, as well as an electronic comment card. Your input is important to us! #CollierCounty Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. University of Florida/ IFAS Extension Office Multipurpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 IMMOKALEE RD Aob 10 Like Eel STUDY AREA Comment 4 Comments 5 Shares Share Most Relevant Write a comment... NONE Kathleen Stanley Sullivan 400 unit apartment complex going in?? I Like • Reply • 2d ILynne Nichols Scheiner Kathleen Stanley Sullivan what about water? Will we be forced to pay for city water pipes? https://www.facebook.com/ColIierGov/posts/24361464781 0281 1/2 10/29/21, 10:40 AM (3)Facebook 2 1 q + p a W Reply to Kathleen Stanley Sullivan... inLynne Nichols Scheiner We are screwed. No more peace and quiet. ILike • Reply • 1d Christina Copanic What about oil well and everglades. Traffic is horrible in morning Like • Reply • 2d https://www.facebook.com/ColIierGov/posts/243614647810281 2/2 GGEACA will hold a meeting for MEMBERS and select guests. WHEN: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 TIME: 7:00 pm, WHERE: Fire Station #71, 100 13th St SW. Behind the Library on GG Blvd. We will be discussing 4H of Collier Co, the RLSA, the proposed church at 8th St NE and 22nd Ave, and Oil Well Rd, and the 400 Apartments at the 47 ac across from the OrangeTree Publix. Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association is a private 501(c)4 not for profit Corporation. GGEACA is not a government organization. We have the right to approve or disapprove membership as a private corporation, and participation in our meetings. Read the Article Collier County Commissioner's Business Deals Spark Questions of Conflict from www.Gulfshorebusiness.com McDaniel admits he made the deal to remove his $23.3 million of personal debt with the owners of Immokalee Road Rural Villages after he was elected in 2016. FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL: Go to Florida Attorney General - File A Complaint (myfloridalegal.com), website Click on "General Inquires or Complaints" Fill out Section 1 with your Contact Information For Section 2: Subject/Category - Conflict of Interest Name/Firm/Company - District 5 Commissioner Bill McDaniel, Board of County Commissioners, Collier County. Street Address: 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, BCC Offices, Naples, FL 34112 County: Collier Phone: 239-252-8605 Website: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/ Date: 04/21/21 Amount: 0 Pmt Method: (leave blank) Questions/Comments: (Copy and Paste the paragraph below in the box)... UPDATE ON THE BCC AGENDA FOR 11.09.21 Again the District 5 Commissioner Bill McDaniel has neglected to keep the Estates Residents informed of changes that are considered important to Estates Residents. Want to Join BURIED down in the CONSENT AGENDA under item 16.A.10, The GGEACA or developer GM Advisors is going to swap a 5 acre parcel to Collier Co for a 3.1 acre parcel, in order to have 3 contiguous parcels in order to Donate develop a Commercial/Retail Center next to the Corkscrew Fire Station. online....... Items on the Consent Agenda are the most dangerous to the Estates Residents. Items are approved at the beginning of a BCC meeting when the Commissioners Vote to Approve the Agenda. This information was made available to the Estates Residents when it came out in the Agenda - that must be made available to the public 5 days prior to the BCC meeting. Someone needs to question the Commissioner why this was not brought up in prior Townhall meetings. These are the comments from the Clerk of Courts Crystal Kinzel on this Agenda Item 16.A.10. Recommendation to approve and execute the attached Developer Agreement associated with the land exchange of the County's 3.7 +/- acre parcel (less and except northern 0.6+/- acres), to be replaced with the 5.0 +/- acre parcel owned by GM Advisors, LLC subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Developer Agreement. (District 5) Clerk Comments: The developer, GM Advisors, owns the three parcels outlined in yellow, while Collier County owns the parcel highlighted in white. The developer is seeking to trade the yellow parcel at the far left for the County parcel in white. The County is receiving a 5- acre parcel in exchange for a net 3.1-acre parcel and the developer will also construct new water management features on the 5-acre parcel to replace the existing structure. As a result of the land swap, the developer will have 3 adjacent parcels, two of which front directly on Immokalee Road. This will impact the size of final development capability. To see the entire list of the Clerk of Courts Crystal Kinzel Comments about the 11.09.21 BCC Agenda CLICK HERE Crystal Kinzel watches were the money goes. She is one of the best friends to the Estates Residents. FYI: WILSON BLVD WIDENING STUDY TODAY 5.00-7.00PM IFAS Extension Office 14700 Immokalee This is a walk through and look at the pictures. No presentation If you can't make it go online to: Wilson Widening Study to view the documents Add your comments by taking the Wilson Project Survey Online GGEACA's main concern is that Collier County Public Utilities, Water and Sewer District (CCWSD) do not install water and sewer Cllick on MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION tab. COLLIER MOSQUITO CONTROL: VISIT THE WEBSITE FOR TREATMENT SCHEDULES CLICK ON THE SKEETER.. WW IN Click here to i BCC agenda: A8DI17 fi!',E AOOF �lUHS 2018 GOLDEN GF MASTER PLAN UPDATE BCC: EMAIL ADDRESSE Andy. Solis@colliercountyf Rick. LoCastro@toll iercou Burt.Saunders@colliercou Penny.Taylor@colliercoun BiII.MCDaniel@colliercoun for Collier MPO age for Collier MPO we GGEACA COMMUNITY PRI( 1.Transportation a) Randall and Immokalee inter b) Golden Gate Blvd, 18th to E c) Safety bridges: -16th St. NE at Cypress Ca -47th Ave NE at Golden Gt Main Canal d) Safety Bridge on 10th Ave Faka Union Canal e) Randall and Immokalee inter f) 4 lane construction of Randa g) Ingress/egress to the Estate of White Blvd h) Bridge to Frangipani on 8th 2. Big Corkscrew Island Regional 3. Economic Development/Jobs 4. Watershed Management Issue 5. Wildfire prevention/ response n 6. EMS 7. Bears and Panthers 8. Modify LDC in regards to Chart WANT MORE INFO ON THE PROPS IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL CI After reading the article "Collier County Commissioner's Business Deals Spark Questions of Conflict" from www.Gulfshorebusiness.com or https://www.gulfshorebusiness.com/collier- county-commissioners-business-deals-spark- questions-of-conflict/ , the residents of District 5 Collier County have a problem with Conflict of Interest and unlawful compensation with Commissioner Bill McDaniel and he needs to be investigated. McDaniel has used his elected office to remove $23.3 million in personal debt. We need help. Read referenced article also available at this web address: http://ggeaca.homestead.com/ 2021_0421_gulfshorebusiness_Collier_County_ Commissioners_ Business_Deals_Spark_Questio of_Conflict.pdf CLICK HERE TO DOMILOAO DRAFTTOWN AGMT COLLIER ENTERPRISES—BELLMAR VILLAGE SRX APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, MONDAY, 04.19.21 WITH A 5-0 VOTE, 2 Board members absent. The Growth Management Division Planning staff spent the entire time justifying all their economic findings that the Bellmar Village was "fiscally neutral" to the Collier Co Taxpayer. Collier Co Water & Sewer District indicated they were making money, and not taxing all Collier Taxpayers, only the users of the CCSWD. The most interesting answer came from Growth Management Division Planning Staff - In regards to impact fees for future infrastructure and transportation components needed by Bellmar - they are "fiscally neutral" based on "legal cap" restrictions. No one would answer the question - Does the money calculated to be collected pay for the actual cost to build the new infrastructure and transportation components created by building Bellmar? Guess there is still a "black box" or "black hole" the money goes into. Read More.. Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church has submitted applications to for a Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment (PL20190001333) and Conditional Use Permit (PL20190001326) Folio 37750560009 and Folio 37750560106, total 5.15 acres. The location of this proposed church is at the intersection of 8th St NE and 22nd Ave NE. This location is in the middle of Golden Gate Estates a low density community of homes for families. GGEACA is committed to the protection of the community of Golden Gate Estates and the unique quality of life it offers to families. GGEACA is against any conversion of a lot in Golden Gate Estates away from Single lines in the Wilson Blvd ROW. We have to monitor for this. That would destroy the Estates ability to stay LOW DENSITY, RURAL. GGEACA recommends that we have a sidewalk on one side and a linear park on the other side. A linear park is similar to the wide asphalt path on the east side of Collier Blvd A MAJOR issue that GGEACA has discovered with road widening in the Estates has to do with the Residents utilizing the canals for recreation. After Golden Gate Blvd was widened from Wilson Blvd to Everglades Blvd to 4 lanes, Collier County Transportation closed access of the canal between 10th St SE and 8th St SE to the Residents of the Estates. According to Collier County Growth Management Deputy Director Trinity Scott - the only way Estates Residents can access canals after road widening is if it is put into the Planning/Corridor Study such as this. It also must include approval from Parks and Recreation because it will have to be managed as a Public Boat Ramp Park. Collier County Parks and Recreation can do this, they already operate a Public Boat Ramp/Park on the Golden Gate Canal called the Golden Gate Boat Ramp, click for info. If you think that Estates Residents should be able to access the canals in the Estates for Recreation, then you will have to - MAKE NOISE- communicate that in the Project Survey for this project and TFI I the (�nmmiccinnorc Below is an article in www.GulfshoreBusiness.com Magazine published April 21, 2021 about the apparent conflicts of interest Commissioner Bill McDaniel has in representing or not representing all the residents of District 5 in Collier County. Go to www.Gulfshorebusiness.com and read the entire article. Could We Do Better? The questions comes down to "do you have to own land at the time of a vote to have a conflict of interest?" County Attorney Klatzkow left this issue open. "Believe" is attorney code for "maybe, maybe not." Perhaps Commissioner Penny Taylor could request that the newly formed 2020 Naples Ethics Commission could look at this issue as their first case, or Maybe Collier County Government should have an Ethics Commission............ CLICK HERE FOR INFO ON NAPLES ETHICS COMMISSION Collier County Commissioner's Business Deals Spark Questions of Conflict AT 8TH ST NE AND 22ND A\ A Collier County Resident of look at the Economic Numbe connected to the Golden Gat Course. The BCC has a difficult time makir LOGICAL decisions because of pc There is no doubt that when the R get involved and demonstrate Iogil the BCC will make better decision; Let's take a look at the Economic I presented by the Resident... If the gross revenue anticipated b� Corp is $300,000 a year and 3% i< back to Collier Co Govt - this tram $9,000/year return on a $7mm inv This would take Club Corp 777 ye back the return on the investment exclusive of interest in the principe by Brett Blackledge, Gulfshore Business Magazine Family Homes. The proposed Church development is on 2 parcels of land which removes 2 locations where a family could build a home. Golden Gate Estates provides the most unique place in Collier County to build a home for a family. There are many other places a church can build. GGEACA will be discussing this issue further at our Membership meeting this Wednesday 21 April 2021, at our meeting location of Fire Station #71, 100 13th St SW, behind the Library on GG Blvd. READ MORE... FASCIANATING! The Collier County Planning Commission had to cancel its meeting today 04/15/21, due to not having a quorum, and will not hear the Bellmar Village proposal; and therefore delays the Town Plan/Aggregation Agreement submitted by Collier Enterprises. The Bellmar Village proposal is also tied to the developers agreement from Collier Enterprises (CE) that will bypass the "public planning process" and create a RLSA "Town," classification, if all 3 CE Villages (Rivergrass, Longwater and Bellmar) are approved. The "Town" classification will allow CE to "saddle" additional long term infrastructure cost on the Collier County Taxpayer in the future. CE withdrew its initial application for Rural Lands West for a "Town" for these 3 areas January 2019, because it would have had to contribute more to transportation and infrastructure and make less profit. The developers are worried that it may take longer to get their permits to build. But it is very fortunate that the cancellation allows the public more time to study and prepare comments for the Planning Commission hearing. The more light shined on this issue, the better it is for the Collie Resident. More Light needs to be shined on the "Town Agreement" and the formula used to determine impact fees that favors the developer. The current formula used by Collier County Planners for future developments undercounts the number of residents in a household. This "undercounting" leads to transferring the cost burden to the Collier County taxpayer. According to Commissioner McDaniel at his Townhall meeting 04/14/21, CE is doing nothing wrong and should get everything they want. Read More.. bjblack35@gmail.com April 21, 2021 Editor's Note: This article was produced in partnership with The Florida Center for Government Accountability, a nonprofit legal and journalism program advocating public access to local government. When William McDaniel ran for Collier County Commission in 2016, he campaigned on his business experience in real estate and as founder of an excavation company. He won the election, despite a history of business problems, including unpaid tax liens, property foreclosures and personal liability for multimillion -dollar business loans. After taking office, McDaniel's fortunes changed. He helped set up the sale of his business property to a developer planning a rural village in north - central Collier. The deal erased his obligation to pay $42.7 million owed on two defaulted loans and gave the development crucial access to Immokalee Rd. Some Collier County residents have questioned McDaniel's interests in the transaction. The deal allowed Palm Beach County developer Jeff Greene to buy McDaniel's former excavating company's land for the Immokalee Road Rural Village plan. New details about the deal and how McDaniel benefitted have renewed those concerns. McDaniel had a business relationship with Greene before the sale, recommended him as a buyer for his land during the foreclosure negotiations and insisted that his personal responsibility for the defaulted business loans be erased as part of the deal to quickly sell the Collier land, according to court records and interviews. In March, McDaniel voted with his fellow commissioners to start the approval process for the Immokalee Road Rural Village project. Commissioners in the coming months will consider changing the county's growth plan and rezoning the property in the environmentally sensitive rural area for the new homes and businesses promised by Greene. Critics of the plan argue McDaniel's connection to the land deal serves at the very least as an example of how some commissioners are too cozy with developers. At worst, McDaniel's case serves as an example of a commissioner personally benefiting from a development project, some residents argue. "There's a huge issue here of quid pro quo," said Michael Ramsey, president of the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association, which represents the community just south of the planned development. "They both have interests," Ramsey said of the developer and McDaniel. "He does hflict of interest." READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE.... If Club Corp does a 18 hole golf c( there are 4 golfers on each hole (li tournament, and the course was fl day (128 rounds per day) and 300 (4300 rounds) at $50/round, Club gross revenue would be $2,160,0( paid back to Collier Co Govt calcu $64,800 per year. This 3% return take108 years to pay back the $7r investment, exclusive of interest it principal. READ MORE: 5.21 is is article #2 in a continuation of the of evidence that a pattern has been evolving with Commissioner McDaniel and his hanc ack dogs like Planning Commission member Robert Klucik to: Prevent or limit Public participation in the planning or permitting process. Delay the release of information until the very last minute to prevent or minimize public participation and their ability to devek se of opposition Bully the Public so they won't show up or speak out. Support developers no matter what they propose. GEACA will be pirp-,priting more evidence. Stay tuned. ead Article #1, ince the March 9, 2021 BCC meeting, It has become apparent that Commissioner McDaniel has developed a pattern of beha Baling with the residents of Golden Gate Estates. That pattern is to not allow the residents to know what the information about issues are fect their quality of life - until the absolute last minute required by law; and then don't tell them everything. tem 11.13. on the 03/09/21 BCC Agenda was the proposal for the Collier County Government to buy the 1046 acres owned by E jollier Partnership LLLP at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Camp Keais and Oil Well Rd. According to the Executive Summa acquisition was to to facilitate future uses such as hurricane debris management and horticultural processing, potential relocation of fairgrt 2021 0309 BCC MEETING AGENDA ITEM 11.13 PURCHASE OF 1046 ACC FROM BCC AT SE QUAD OF CAMP KEAIS AND OIL WELL RD PID 00227240009 S22 T48 R29 PID 00227280001 S23 T48 R29 Agenda Item 11.13. for the 03.09.21 BCC meeting (tomorrow) describes the purpose of buying the 1046 acres from Barron Collier Co on the southeast quadr the intersection of Camp Keais Strand Rd and Oil Well Rd. See Attached. The Executive Summary indicates it is for the relocation of the fairgrounds, essential public services, hurricane debris management, EMS low income housin Collier County's future needs. ( See attached) What it does not tell you is that in prior presentations by Commissioner McDaniel he wants to see the Fairgrounds and swamp buggy park moved to this prol location. He has also indicated that he would like to see the current fairground location on 39th Ave NE become the new School Bus Barn Facility for Collier Public Schools. Most interesting is in the documentation for this Agenda Item it appears that they are using a very old Black and White aerial photo to conceal the fact that th an Illegal Dumping Operation currently operating on these parcels. Looking at the 2020 aerial photos on the Property Appraisers website you can see the illegal dumping operation. Why did they not use the most recent aeria photos. The public is required to use the most current aerial photos when applying for permits. It appears that this Agenda Item 11.13. and the documentation is created to mislead the public to: 1. Hide the fact that the landowner BCC has an illegal dumping operation, 2. Have Collier County Government purchase it, claim that they will use it for hurricane debris management, and make it legal. 3. Allow BCC to bypass the legal Conditional Use Process. The District 5 Commissioner McDaniel would have to be aware of all this information prior to the creation of this Agenda Item, since it his District, and he has Commissioner for 5 years. These are your Commissioners, let them know how you feel. Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov CLICK HERE TO SEE THE AERIAL Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov PHOTOS AND EXEC SUMMARY Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov The map to the left is the area selected for the Immokalee Rd/Randall Blvd Planning Study. There is an Online Zoom meeting for this planned for November 30, 2020 at 5.30 pm. IMN ADA MDh Click Here to Register for the Meeting. °Lw;gQJKT AIR The Golden Gate Master Plan and Estates Community has reviewed and approved the areas with green check marks."'"�'�° P.M NPD The 3 areas crossed out in red are landowners that seek to convert Estates land zoned for Single Family homes and REZONE it for Commercial Development. These were not reviewed and approved by the Estates Community in the Golden Gate Master Plan. This appears to be another attempt to by Commissioner McDaniels to BYPASS the Golden Gate Master Plan and help developers put profits in their pockets at the expense of the Estates Residents. C''�'"H'A'"' ; Rezone requests for 3 areas crossed out in red have been denied for the last 20 years to W. •' protect single family homes. iw.eu nv GGEACA needs your help to protect these areas from Commercial Developers. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC (WMI) OPERATING AT THE COLLIER COUNTY LANDFILL RENEWS DEP AIR PERMIT TO BURN METHANE AT THE COLLIER COUNTY LANDFILL WITHOUT ANY DISCUSSION WITH THE ESTATES RESIDENTS? �,.1,.,L -uL UCTI-Mf Aii 0Y - Methane (CH4) is a colorless, odorless, highly flammable combustible gas. It is the main component in Natural Gas. It is created in landfills by the decomposition of organic waste. Leaks that are not known/found can cause huge explosions, i.e. the San Bruno, California Pipeline Explosion. Natural Gas was leaking at a certain location for a period of time. The amount of gas built up in a small area, then an unknown ignition source caused the explosion. BEWARE OF THE NEW CONSERVATION "CON" COLLIER TAX INCREASE PROPOSAL FOR 2020. ACCELERATES DEVELOPMENT IN GOLDEN GATE ESTATE.... uLN� ti3OS COMMISSIONER MCDANIELS USES �xs CONSERVATION COLLIER TO ACCELERATE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE ESTATES .... ALSn -­ 4 ''. -a Tno s below L L+rssa Jaf tiv. i L�Ea AccrrreArrs oc�.�wur � Below is a must read Article from the Naples Daily News by Judith M. Hushon and Lynn S. Martin - Guest columnists to the Naples Daily News. This is another example of how Commissioner McDaniel's support of Developers in the RLSA will put more profit money in their pockets - after taking it out of yours....... "Eastern Collier developers must heed policy, pay for infrastructure" �1" Zo SOME PEOPLE CALL IT - neetTn� CONSERVATInFJ "r_nFJ-q" rrOLLIER. ✓-� 1i-NIJ:, k�iE Why? L•Y1i3rA i.Y, 1C s C• . Understanding the TDR program in Collier County Government, Naples, Florida CHAPTER 1. DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TDR is the acronym for TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. Development Rights originate from Property, or Property Rights. Property Rights are a fundamental belief of the Founding Fathers built into the US Constitution. "Property" is the basis for every "right" we have and enjoy now in the United States. The right to acquire, enjoy and dispose of property is protected by the Constitution's Fifth Amendment's "Due Process..... 2020 BRIDGE RE-EVALUATION FOR GG ESTATES Below is information of the new 2020 Bridge Re- evaluation study currently underway. Money form the new 1 cent sales tax can be used for this. Some of you have received mailings about a NIM's on 9/30/20 at 5:30 p.m. for the potential for a bridge on Once again Commissioner McDaniel goes against the Estates Residents vested rights to maintain their quality of life on 4th St NE to help a Developer. " PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST (PSSF) —WESTERN PROTECTIVE , LEVEE — WATER QUALITY STUDY `1 �..... VIRTUAL MEETING TODAY 10.20.20 @ 3PM. CLICK HERE TO REGISTER GGEACA wants to make sure the residents of the Estates know who is working for them. At the BCC meeting of 13 October 2020, Agenda Item 11.B. concerning a new Business coming to Collier County, Building a Distribution Facility in District 5. The name of the business is ULINE. It is one of the top distributors in North America's for shipping, packaging & industrial supplies. You have probably got a catalog in the mail of their products. [:C: 'Eqt 4, 40RL-10,, A BIG THANKS goes out to Deputy County Manager Nick Casalanguida & the Delivery Team for bringing this project to Collier County. HOW DID THOSE 125 FOOT TALL, 30 FOOT WIDE TRANSMISSION POWER POLES GET IN FRONT OF MY ESTATES HOME? JUST SHOCKING! What the Heck are "Franchise M,L„ Fees?" Annual Rent Payments' Commissioner McDaniels once again proves he cares more about helping developers than the residents of District 5 and especially people living in Golden Gate Estates. At the 14 July 2020 BCC meeting on item 9.A. Ventana Pointe GMP Amendment, Commissioner McDaniel's made the recommendation that the Developers of Ventana Pointe in the Rural Fringe Mixed Used District (RFMUD) should be allowed to transfer property to the badly managed Conservation Collier program. View the meeting at this link: 50min 30 sec into the meeting. Wilson Blvd north of Imi 1 c a Z( - ^ 3et. Right click on images to "view image" for larger view. Developments on the borders of GG Estates in the RLSA & RFMUD #1 Rivergrass SRA, #2 Bellmar SRA #3 Longwater SRA * SKY SAIL aka HYDE PARK aka WINCHESTER LAKES * Immokalee Rd Rural Villages (RFMUD) S� LL lvl 10/25/21, 4:01 PM Main road in Golden Gate Estates could be getting expansion - NBC2 News First Alert Radar 7 Day Forecast Live Stream Newslinks Contact Us Job Spot Mond� HOME NEWS VAX FACTS WEATHER NEWSLINKS TRAFFIC FEATURES O 00 JOBS & RECRUITING Fort Myers WSW 16 Mph 860 Feels like 96° Mostly Clear Current conditions Hourly 7-day forecast Weather map Home » News » Local » Main road in Golden Gate Estates could be getting expansion Main road in Golden Gate Estates could be getting expansion Jennifer Kveglis 7:53 PM EDT, Sun October 24, 2021 Ali 61 COLLIER COUNTY, Fla. — Collier County Growth Management is considering making some changes to existing roadways before development comes to Eastern Collier County. The county recently hired a third -party engineering firm to conduct a corridor widening study on Wilson Boulevard South. The 3.2-mile stretch spans from Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard. The idea would be to widen the road from two to four lanes, add sidewalks, a bike lane, and revamped bus stations. "It's a major roadway. It's busy all of the time," Eric Ramirez, the president of Laram Construction Inc. said. https://nbc-2.com/news/local/2021 /10/22/main-road-in-golden-gate-estates-could-be-getting-expansion/ 1/5 10/25/21, 4:01 PM Main road in Golden Gate Estates could be getting expansion - NBC2 News Ramirez grew up n* Wilson Boulevard South. Now his business sits along it. A few weeks ago, he and his neighbors received a flyer in the mail from the county about the study. 0 Advertisement "I definitely do think it's needed," he said, "I know we have Vanderbilt Beach Road [extension project] coming in between 10th and 12th, so it's going to get even busier and with the traffic and everybody moving into the area. I think it would be a great help." Joe'I Perkins, who lives along the road, said the time it takes to travel to Naples is unpredictable. "Normal conditions, 20 to 25 minutes. But now, 40 to 45 minutes. It's a big difference," Perkins said. "If it's done right, engineered right, it'll be a beautification for this community." RELATED TOPICS Brush fires put early strain on Collier fire crews 0 OCTOBER 24, 2021 Baby raccoon euthanized after living with Collier family for months 0 OCTOBER 22, 2021 0 Advertisement Collier County Growth Management will hold a Public Information Meeting for this project on Wednesday, October 27 at the OF/IFAS Collier Extension Building from 5 to 7 p.m. 0 Advertisement Tags: collier county Golden Gate Estates Sponsored Content https://nbc-2.com/news/local/2021 /10/22/main-road-in-golden-gate-estates-could-be-getting-expansion/ 2/5 10/29/21, 10:31 AM Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting — Wed., Oct. 27 at 5 p.m. — Nextdoor nextdoor (/news feeds A Homevnews_feedn UneighborM1aod/tsource-more_mei (hops//nextdowvaccinemap.corW Q DigeztVdigezt?a=zattings) Neighborhood x.. (/trealmap/?is= av_bar) 0 HeI... Viral,_map/?i-r-bar) IVrecommendations?is=nev_bar) Ufor zale_arxlfree/?init source=mc Local D... VoHers?is=nav_bar) is Public Agen...Vagenry/feedd B E—.V..n.1) ® Reel... VreaFestate?is=sitlebar) ® 5afetyv'ri and safety/i W —& Fo... Vlost and found) p Do<amemaVdocument:q ® Geneml(IgenenV) Groups fa AII... (/9roups/?is=nav_men.) Topics o AII... VchanneWis=nav--menu) Jirectones A NeighbosVdirectory/) 4—(ffiet_dir—,) Hap o,dI G V,eighwrhooa_gei-r-9eiad'me.) -.c ..wa WHminn bwVe.opb. V..aviPb.n-pre VP,..z/I elog ,ftoWb1.,, sad-r-) ®2021 NeMdopr Search Nextdoor a1Vnonfi iboxl9 This is a post from a B Q(hUpsV/help.neMdoor.conVs/art!cle/How-to-connect- Local Agency. with -your -public -agencies) Collier County Govemmem VagenrydetaiVFl/collier/mllier-courtly-govert ... Social Media Coordinator Collier County Ronda f/profile/5028 64•20lM Vp/ A—deta l) Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting- Wed., Oct 27 at 5 p.m. If you We or commute on Wilson Boulevard (between Golden Gate Boule.•ard and Immokelee Road) you wont want to miss this public meeting. The Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study is evaluating alternatives W widen the roadway from two -lanes (existing) to four -lanes. To learn more about the study visit ht4,s//cocoa.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (hdpj/www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies) (under "Current- Wilson Bw. Widening Corridor Study"). If you aren't able to attend the meeting, please review the prcJ information online and give us your feedback! The meeting displays and handouts are available online, as well as an el—ric comment card. (htlpsV/flask.us.nex[door.com/cV0M41 f3EyVw9]KkyAB]KpI SynGin6 Posted to Subscribes of Collier Coumy Government M 5 Neighbors l Comments Q Like {) Commem Share - nrew AlB.on oan6lerzgs633n/?ia=serail_wmmamer)•cnmen sate E..ate. ... Vneighborhood/goldengateestates-Naples-FL/hource=neighbo�fiaad_name) Great more delays 2001, Like Reply share f1 Toth VpwNenslTlwe6/?is.aeuiF<ommemed • saarnia Lakes VneigM1borhood/zatumialakes--Naples--FV?source=neighborhoo4name) •• Widening roads NEVER works to reduce traffic Its been proven eMe wely to only increase taf cc Look up "induced demand" 20 Oct Like Rspf share �t Felicia Broome Willie VPwfle/C9265m5Rs=feed_wmmenter) • Gadand Estates Vndghborhwd/gadandstatas--Naples--FL ••• =neiglrborh000_name) don't think they care about reducing traffic, it's mare of making room for all these new people.0ur little town is being over flowed at an extensive rate. 6day-go Like Reply Share ■2 a VPmfile/fi21gfi9fig(2ia=deuil_commemer) • Golden Gare Esretez Uneighbomooa/golaengateestates--Naples--FL/?source=neighharbooa_name) ••• How are the, going to fit two more lanes there? 5dayzago Like Reply Share Felicia eroome Willie VProlIUa92fisa15( ts=feer[rommenaer) • Gadand Estmes Uneighhorhood/gadantlestmes--Naples--fV? ••• -neighborhood_name) Patfid.I ,.//rreatdoorcoMpr.fl./621969Nfl Init_source—aentlon_i nrnnent_click) I don't know all the correct or exalt termindogy, but in layman's ternS(D ..the county owns the easements and where your mail bos is. Look at White Blvd heading West before you get to 951 That also used to be 2lanes, and fairly tiny. Now it's much wider. I imagine with the foresight of also widening to have 21anes on either side as well. (edited) 4d Like Reply Share A Sherri Holcombe VpwNe25433025Riz=detaitcommenrerl•Golden Gate Estates ••• rVn.ighborhood/galdengateertates--NaPles--FL/?source=neighborMod_name) While sitting in that incredible traffic mess on Friday on the Blvd, I looked to turn on to Wilson.Itlookedjustasbackedup.Maybe4laneswouldhelp. more cro,roads between GG Blvd and Vanderbib/ 1-1,elee, GG Blvd and 16th. 5dayzago Like Reply share f1 Felici,B Willie tlenpwfile/C9265g15Fs=detail_rommenter), Gadand Eztnez — Vneighboainood/gadan aple.-- L/hource neighborhooa_wme) I agree, that was rats! One accident and it took me almost 3 hours to get to GG City, and live less than 15 minutes from town. Imagine if there were a few accidents a month, God forbid. 4daysago Like Reply Share QP1 Add a commen, https:Hnextdoor.com/news—feed/?post=205058641 &init_source=search 1/1 10/29/21, 10:33 AM Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting — Wed., Oct. 27 at 5 p.m. — Nextdoor nextdoa Vnews_feed/) A HomeVnews feed/ v VneighborhoodRsour—more_mei (https://nextdoorvaccinemap.com/) ED Digestl/digest?s=settings) Neighborhood 4 New Vtreat mapfli—av_bar) O Hel... Vhelp map/?is=nav_bar) IVrecommendations?is= nav_bar) Vfor sale_and free/?init source=mc Lr9 Local D... Voffers?is=nav_bar) t? Public Agen...Vagency/feed/) EventsVevents/) w Real...Vreal-estate?is=sidebar) ® Safetyi/crime_and safety/ 6a Lost & Fo... (lost and found) DocumentsVdocu ments/ GeneralVgeneral/ Groups & All... Vgroups/?is=nav_menu) Topics a AII... Vchannels/?is=nav_menu) Directories Neighbors(/directory/ ZV PetsVpet_directory) Help (/help/) Guidelines Vneighborhood-guidelines/»guidelines) Legal(https✓/help.ne#doo,.wm/s/legal) Privacy Vprivacyyol icyl) About Vabout us/ lobs (/obs/) Press Vpre A Blog (hnps://blog.nextdoor.com) ® 2021 NeMdoor Search Nextdoor This is a post from a O Q (httpsV/help.nextdoor.com/s/article/How-to-connect- Local Agency. with -your -public -agencies) Collier County Govemment Vagency-detail/fl/collier/collier-county-goverr ••• Social Media Coordinator Collier County Flonda (/profile/S0282776A • 2 days ago view -detail) Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting -Wed., Oct 27 at 5 p.m. Don't forget tonights meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study. We will be showing the project concepts to widen the roadway from two -lanes (existing) to four -lanes. To learn more about the study, visit https;//www.col liercou ntyfl.gov/planningstudies (httpsV/www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies) (under "Current- Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study'). If aren't able to attend tonight's meeting, the meeting displays and handouts are available online, as well as an electronic comment card. Your input is important to us! (https://flask.us.nextdoor.com/ct/nM41 f3EyVw97KkyAB7KpISynGin6 Posted to Subscribers of Collier County Government 0 2 Neighbors C) Like �) Comment A Share Add a comment.. a Vnotifii https:Hnextdoor.com/news_feed/?post=205797113&init_source=search 1/1 From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia; Ross, Colleen/ORL; Gramer, Bill/SWF Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Commissioner Penny Taylor, October 22, 2021 District 4 Newsletter - Beach Renourishment Project 2021-2021 & Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study included Date: Friday, October 22, 2021 5:44:25 PM For the project public involvement Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Co Yer County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252.5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.gov From: DeaneConnie <Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 5:32 PM To: McLeanMatthew <Matthew.McLean@colliercountyfl.gov>; MillerAndrew <Andrew.Miller@colliercountyfl.gov>; DarcoChristopher <Christopher.Darco@colliercountyfl.gov>; KingBryan <Bryan.King@colliercountyfl.gov>; LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; AhmadJay <Jay.Ahmad@colliercountyfl.gov>; MessamMarlene <Marlene.Messam@colliercountyfl.gov>; McCoyDennis <Dennis.McCoy@colliercountyfl.gov>; Bosch Robert <Robert.Bosch @colliercountyfl.gov>; ShueGene <Gene.Shue@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: PattersonAmy <Amy. Patterson @colliercountyfl.gov>; ScottTrinity <Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov>; Marcellaleanne <Jeanne.Marcella@colliercountyfl.gov>; DeLaRosal-issett<Lissett.DeLaRosa @colliercountyfLgov> Subject: FW: Commissioner Penny Taylor, October 22, 2021 District 4 Newsletter - Beach Renourishment Project 2021-2021 & Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study included FYI — Commissioner Taylor's newsletter below includes information on the Beach Renourishment Project 2021-2021 & Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study From: Collier County District 4 Commissioner Penny Taylor <penny.taylorna colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 5:09 PM To: DeaneConnie <Connie.Deane(cDcolliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Commissioner Penny Taylor, October 22, 2021 District 4 Newsletter EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Can you guess who this person is? She... . Graduated from Stetson University College of Law in 1978 . Was awarded the Naples Daily News Citizen of the Year in 2000 . Was awarded Collier County Women's Bar Association, Attorney of the Year 2005 . Was awarded Attorney of the Year, Legal Aid 2010 . Was awarded Florida Bar President's Pro Bono Service Award, Florida Bar 2010 . Was Founding Chair of the Juvenile Justice Council in Collier County . Was Founding Director of the Collier County Senior Resource Center Was awarded Attorney of the Year, the Florida Law Related Education Association of the Florida Bar 1990 And... Was elected to the Florida House of Representatives in 2010 and elected to the Florida Senate in 2016 and was elected as the Senate Majority leader by her peers in 2018- 2020, and was named Senate President from 2022-2024. Any Idea? This remarkable woman is Kathleen Passidomo, a 42 year resident of Collier County and Mother of three, and Grandmother of two little boys. She and her husband, John Passidomo, also an attorney with offices on Fifth Avenue South in the City of Naples, are tireless in their support of our community. When the `Great Recession' brought foreclosure after foreclosure to Collier County, Kathleen's leadership along with Jeff Ahren of Legal Aid created the Collier County Foreclosure Task Force to help the desperate homeowners through the crisis. Kathleen assistance during the COVID -19 crisis was instrumental in facilitating the initial vaccine rollout for the elderly in our community. Senator Passidomo it the epitome of what it means to be a public servant. And now Kathleen has achieved state-wide recognition. She is the third woman ... ever ... in the long history of the Florida Senate, to be named Senate President! Collier County will be celebrating Senator Passidomo's swearing in next November. More details to follow. ®❑ Congratulations Senator Passidomo! Collier County is lucky to call you our own! Board of Collier County Commissioners Meeting October 26, 2021 9: 00 a.m. This will be a Hybrid Remote meeting and it will be held in the Board of County Commissioners Chambers, third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida. Some of the Board Members may be appearing remotely, with staff present in person. The public may attend either remotely or in person. The meeting will be broadcast live with closed captioning on Collier Television channel 97/98 and via live streaming at www.colliercountyfl.gov/ctv. Individuals who would like to participate in person must complete and submit a speaker form prior to the beginning of the discussion about the item. Individuals who would like to participate remotely must complete and submit the online speaker registration form prior to the beginning of the meeting. The agenda will be available on the Commissioner Taylor's website Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register at https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_haLNWi2aTV- dsMh9jmPCg, Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. G] Collier County Beach Renourishment Project 2021-2022 Scheduled to Begin Soon In early November crews will start spreading 268,500 tons of sand across City of Naples and Collier County beaches to revitalize our sandy shores for residents and visitors alike. The $5M project will be similar to other beach renourishment projects handled by Collier County over the past several years utilizing trucks to haul beach quality sand from Stewart Mining in Immokalee. Beach areas receiving sand this time are: . a two-mile section of Naples Beach from Lowdermilk Park to near Naples Pier . a 1.3-mile section of Vanderbilt Beach from south of Delnor Wiggins State Park to approximately one-half mile south of Vanderbilt Beach Road . a half -mile stretch of Pelican Bay Beach from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Reference monument R-34 to R-36 ** Pelican Bay beach will be paid for by the Pelican Bay Services Division since it is not a public beach.** Cost of the sand from Stewart Mining was approved by the BCC this past May. That cost is just over $2.6 million for Naples and Vanderbilt beaches and $330,000 for the Pelican Bay beach segment which will be paid for by Pelican Bay Tourist Development Tax funds (most coming from taxes paid by visitors utilizing hotels and motels commonly referred to as "bed tax") are the funding source. Set up of equipment and staging areas for the project are expected to start next week and sand placement will start in early November at Naples Beach. Crews will then move their operations to Vanderbilt Beach most likely in early December and then to Pelican Bay in early January 2022. Staff is working with the Collier County Sheriff's Office, Lee County Sheriff's Office, and the City of Naples Police Department to define staging areas and coordinate maintenance of traffic support. Trucks hauling sand will use the routes shown in the map at the end of this news release. Trucks heading to the beach location in City of Naples will travel from Stewart Mine in Immokalee to 1-75, exit at Golden Gate Parkway, head west to US 41, go south to Banyan Boulevard and then head west to Gulf Shore Boulevard. They'll then travel south to 3rd Avenue North and unload the beach quality sand at that beach site. The outbound route is north on Gulf Shore Boulevard to east on Mooring Line Drive to south on US 41 and then east on Golden Gate Parkway and back to I-75. In December, when the project moves to Vanderbilt Beach, trucks will use the Immokalee Road exit off I-75, take Livingston Road south to Vanderbilt Beach Road then head west to unload the beach quality sand at that beach site. Completion of the entire project is expected in mid -January 2022. Crews will cease project operations for short breaks over Thanksgiving (11/25/21-11/28/21) and the Christmas/New Year's holidays (12/24/21 -1/2/22). Hours of operations will be six days a week, Mondays through Saturdays, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. For additional information, please contact Coastal Zone Management Section Manager Andy Miller at (239) 252-2922. If you prefer to email any questions or comments, please send them to CZMncolliercountyfl.gov. ®❑ Collier County Parks & Recreation Spooktacular Halloween Events Calling all pumpkins, ghosts, dragons and witches too, we have the perfect event planned just for you. Join Collier County Parks & Recreation for Spooktacular, family friendly fun all month long. Get ready for some haunted fun! Halloween Spectacular Friday, October 22, 6:30 p.m.-9:30 p.m. Cost: $10 (per family) Donna Fiala Eagle Lakes Community Park 11565 Tamiami Trail East, Naples Come join us on a night you won't forget! Enjoy a costume contest, games, pumpkin carving, and more. Oh, there will be candy! Register online at htip://apm.activecommunities.com/collieMarks/Activi-ty—Search/I 7799. For more information, call (239) 252-3527. CFRI Family Halloween Monster Bash Friday, October 22, 6:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Cost: $3 (Each child and adult must pay the $3 entrance fee into the event /must present receipt for entry) Golden Gate Community Center 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples Halloween Bash set for all family members to have a fun night of dancing, music, games, and treats! All guests must be in "Family Friendly Costumes" to attend. Register online at htt :�//apm.activecommunities.com/collierparks/Activity_Search/17588. For more information, call (239) 252-4180. Haunted Candy House Creation Friday, October 22, 5:00 p.m.-6:30 p.m. Cost: $10, ages 4-12 Vineyards Community Park 6231 Arbor Boulevard Naples Children will use an assortment of candy, frosting and cookies to design their own haunted candy house. Everything is included to make a yummy work of art. Please pre -register by Oct 18. Register online at htip://apm.activecommunities.com/collierparks/Activity—Search/I 734 1. For more information, call (239) 252-4105. Halloween Trunk or Treat Friday, October 22, 6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Cost: $5 (per family/cash only) Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park 810 39th Avenue Northeast Naples Join us for our first annual Halloween Trunk or Treat at Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park. Activities include music, candy, crafts, costume contest, prizes & more. Register online at htW://=m.activecommunities.com/collierparks/Activity—Search/I 8235 For more information, call (239) 326-1148. ®❑ Halloween Howl Friday, October 29, 6:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Cost: $3 (per person) East Naples Community Park 3500 Thomasson Drive Naples Please join us for a fun filled night of tricks and treats. A costume contest, games, activities, and inflatable fun awaits. Register online at httTpm. activecommunities. com/collierparks/Activity_S earch/ 17525. For more information, call (239) 252-4414. a i Halloween Party Friday, October 29, 6:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Cost: $10 (per child) Max Hasse Community Park 3390 Golden Gate Boulevard West Naples This Spooktacular event is to provide some holiday fun for children, as well as give their parents a night out. Parents will drop their children off at 6:00 p.m. and pick them up at 8:00 p.m. Participants will enjoy music, cookie decorating, and a costume contest. All registrants will also get a slice of pizza and a drink. Register online at htlp://apm.activecommunities.com/collierparks/ActiviW—Search/I 7234. For more information, call (239) 252-4200. ®❑ Trunk or Treat Drive-Thru Friday, October 29, 6:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Cost: Free, all ages Immokalee Community Park 321 North 1 st Street Immokalee Looking for a place that's safe and fun on Halloween weekend? Please join us for our first ever Trunk or Treat Drive-Thru Celebration! Come have fun with your whole family, see some super cool decorated trunks, while your kids enjoy candy and treats. Invite your friends and neighbors If you would like to participate, please call (239) 252-4449. 0 Collier County Boo-Tacular Friday, October 29, 6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Cost: $3/$5($3 pre -registration and $5 day of event. Online registration closes the day of the event at noon. Walk-ups are welcome at the event.) North Collier Regional Park 15000 Livingston Road Naples Calling All Ghosts & Goblins! This Halloween get ready to experience Collier County Boo-Tacular! Fun for the entire family. Activities include Haunted Walk (Non -Scary 6 p.m. -7 p.m.), Pumpkin Hunt (7:15 p.m.), Costume Contest (7:30 p.m. Ages: 0-5, 7:45 p.m. Ages: 6-11, 8:00 p.m. Ages: 12-17), Entertainment, bounce houses, photo booth, face painting, and food truck vendors. Register online at htTpm. activecommunities. com/collierparks/Activity_S earch/23 311. For more information, call (239) 252-4000. Nightmare on Escambia Street Friday, October 29, 7:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m. Cost: $8 Immokalee Sports Complex 505 Escambia Street Immokalee This pool party will be fun for the entire family. There will be a haunted maze, pumpkin carving and so much more. Be sure to wear your favorite costume. For more information, call (239) 252-8811. Howl-O-Ween Doggie Costume Contest & Parade Saturday, October 30, 9:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. Cost: Free Veterans Community Park 1895 Veterans Park Drive Naples This event will be held at Rover Run Dog Park located at Veterans Community Park. Prizes for all participants. The Grand Prize Winner will receive "Lunch with your Pup" at Boston Beer Garden. Costume Contest winner will be announced at 10:30 a.m. For more information, call (239) 252-8811. ®❑ Rainy Season Advisory Do not drive on roads that are under water. If you cannot see the pavement markings or the edge of pavement it is best not to risk driving into deep water. `Turn around, don't drown.' If all traffic signals at an intersection are damaged, missing, or without power, treat the intersection as a FOUR-WAY STOP situation. However, if drivers approach a signalized intersection where the signal is in flash mode, drivers approaching from the flashing yellow side should proceed with caution and those approaching from the flashing red side should treat the situation as a stop sign. ®❑ Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. A Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the University of Florida/IFAS Extension Office, Multipurpose Room, 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120. (A location map for the meeting that also shows the study project limits is located at the end of this news release.) All interested members of the public are welcome to stop by during the two- hour open house style meeting to review project information and displays as well as to talk one-on-one with the county's study team. There will not be a formal presentation. With the Centers for Disease Control recommendation for social distancing in mind, a limited number of people will be able to enter the meeting room at one time (approximately 30 people). It is recommended that everyone attending the meeting in person, wear a face mask to assist with the prevention of the spread of COVID-19. As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, you may view the meeting displays and handouts posted on the county's website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/n_ l�gstudies (under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") beginning Oct. 20, 2021. Public input is very important, and we encourage all interested parties to either review the latest project information on the county's website or attend the public information meeting and share any comments. Comment cards will be available in both digital (online) and paper (at the meeting) formats. The public comment period will end Nov. 5, 2021. The Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study is evaluating alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane (existing) to a four -lane roadway with curb and gutter, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). The study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements (addition of bus stop pads, etc.). Additional project elements include intersection access changes, drainage system upgrades, existing bridge replacement, utility relocations, and right-of-way acquisition. This study is anticipated to be complete in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded starting in Fiscal Year (FY) 2021. Funding for the construction phase is expected to be available beginning in 2024. For additional information concerning the project, please contact Project Manager Lorraine Lantz at 239-252-8192 or by e-mail at Lorraine.Lantz(ir,,CollierCountyFl.gov. News media inquiries may be directed to Community Liaison Connie Deane at 239-252-8365 or Connie.Deane(a,.colliercountyfl.gov. ®❑ New Payment Gateway and Options for Utility Bills November 1, 2021 Collier County will launch a new online billing and payment solution to offer utility customers more flexibility in managing their water bills. The new payment options will be available on November 1, 2021, via the Utility Billing and Customer Service website at www. colliercountyfl. gov/paywater. Customers of the Collier County Water Sewer District will have more ways to pay their water bills online using credit/debit card, e-check, Apple Pay and Google Pay. "We know paying utility bills isn't your favorite thing to do, so we're making it as easy as possible," said Joe Bellone, director of finance and operations for Collier County Public Utilities. "This is good news for our customers who will have many more options with no added fees." All customers are encouraged to create a new payment account to take advantage of automatic payments, choosing a specific day for payments to process, email reminders, linking multiple accounts and payments by phone and text. The easy -to -use payment portal provides customers with quick access to their accounts. Collier County will continue accepting utility payments by mail and in person. For more information, visit www.colliercountyfl.goy/utilitybilling or call Collier County Utility Billing and Customer Service at (239) 252-2380. Pets, making homes more magical! Its name your price adoptions this October at Collier County Domestic Animal Services. Happiness happens at Collier County Domestic Animal Services! Fill out the online adoption survey to save yourself some time. Adoption includes: Spay/neuter surgery Microchip Vaccinations Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) test for cats Heartworm test for dogs Flea preventative 1-year Collier County license 30 days FREE pet insurance Other goodies! 6 1 11 . III II - '- Collier County Domestic Animal Services is located at: 7610 Davis Blvd. Naples, FL 34104 Monday thru Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. (239) 252-7387 (PETS). ®❑ Collier County Commission District Redistricting and Census Data Update Every ten years, the U.S. Census Bureau provides population counts, and Collier County uses this data to redraw County Commission district process known as "redistricting." Collier County has five Commission boundaries, a districts. One County Commissioner is elected by residents within each district to represent them on the Board of County Commissioners. purpose of redistricting is to modify the boundaries to achieve population equity among the five districts. The 2020 population data required to accomplish redistricting was released from the U.S. Census Bureau on August 12, 2021. The Census Bureau will release the same data in easier -to -use formats by Sept. 30, 2021. Collier County staff will subsequently analyze the population data and [a minimum ofJ three alternative district maps will be drawn. A series of public workshops will be held in November for public review and comment on the alternative district maps to establish new County Commission district boundaries in accordance with Chapter 124, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Constitution. Following public review and comment, the Board of County Commissioners will consider and adopt final updated district boundaries in December 2021. Meeting dates and information related to the Collier County redistricting process will be posted at https://www.colliercountvfl, �Zov/vour-government/divisions-s- z/zoninLy-division/2021-collier-countv-bcc-redistrictinLy- information. For more information, contact David Weeks, AICP, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, 34104 or at phone number 239-252-2305 or by email at ®❑ Florida Department of Health - Collier Weekly COVID-19 Update October 11, 2021 Please see link to COVID-19 weekly situation report (October 1 - October 7, 2021) published October 8, 2021 and this link will update weekly. hap: //ww11.doh. state,fl.us/comm/ partners/covidl9_report_archive/covidl9- data/covid 19_data_latest.pdf Pfizer Booster Update September 24, 2021 Effective immediately, the Pfizer vaccine has been authorized for booster doses. To find a vaccine, please visit vaccines.gov. . The Pfizer booster can be administered 6 months after the second dose. . At this time, combining pharmaceuticals is NOT recommended, i.e. if you received two Moderna vaccines or one J&J vaccine, you should not receive the Pfizer booster. Those who qualify for the booster include: Adults who are 65+ Adults who reside in a long term care facility regardless of age Adults over 50+ with underlying medical conditions Adults 18+ with underlying medical conditions based on individual risk Adults 18+ who are at an increased exposure to COVID due to employment This includes healthcare workers, jail staff, daycare staff, school staff, grocery workers Additionally, a distinction was made between additional doses and booster doses. . A booster refers to a dose given to those who had built enough protection after the first two doses, but protection has waned over time. . An additional dose is for someone who didn't get enough protection after the first two doses, such as the severely immunocompromised. Information regarding booster doses for Moderna and J&J are being researched. ®❑ COVID-19 Testing Hours Expanded Effective Immediately August 11, 2021 When: Monday -Friday, 9am-4pm Time: BY APPOINTMENT ONLY, call (239) 252-6220, Monday -Friday, 9am-5pm. Location: Florida Department of Health in Collier County, 3339 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, 34112. . Drive-Thru . Face masks must be worn while waiting. . No referral needed. No cost. . Lightning, heavy rain, or gusty winds can slow operations or shut down the site. The DOH -Collier call center is available Monday -Friday from 9:00am- 5:00pm. The call center can be reached at (239) 252-6220. For more information regarding COVID-19, visit floridahealthcovidI9.gov/. Collier County Advisory Board Vacancies as of September 7, 2021 The Collier County Board of County Commissioners is seeking applications for positions on several advisory committees. Members of committees must reside and be registered to vote in Collier County. Scroll to the bottom of this page for instructions on how to apply. The Affordable Housing Advisory Committee has one vacancy, and two seats expiring in October. Applicants must qualify under one of the following specific categories related to affordable housing: banking or mortgage industry in connection with affordable housing, labor engaged in home building of affordable housing, non-profit provider of affordable housing, and for -profit provider of affordable housing. This committee was created in accordance with Sect. 420.9076 Fla. Stat., to review policies, procedures, ordinances, land development regulations, and the adopted local government comprehensive plan, and to recommend specific actions or initiatives to encourage affordable housing. Terms are three years. The Animal Services Advisory Board has one vacant seat, representing the category of. veterinarian or vet tech. This seven -member board is tasked to make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on the facilities, programs, and services of Collier County Domestic Animal Services. Terms are four years. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board has two vacancies in the following categories: Gateway Triangle resident, and an at -large member. This nine -member board assists in the implementation of the redevelopment plan for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle area. Terms are three years. The Black Affairs Advisory Board has three seats expiring in June. This nine -member committee identifies and evaluates problems unique to the Black Community, reviews and recommends ways to ensure open communication between minorities and Collier County Government and provides periodic reports to the Board of County Commissioners. Terms are four years. The Building Board of Adjustments and Appeals has two vacancies, and three seats expiring in August. This board hears appeals on rejections or refusals by the Building Code Compliance Director to approve mode of construction or materials to be used in construction or alteration of a structure. Applicants must represent one of the following professions: One state licensed architect or structural engineer; one Class "A" general contractor; one state certified fire protective equipment contractor or State Certified Fire Fighter with the rank of Lieutenant or higher or State Certified Fire Safety Inspector with the rank of Lieutenant or higher; one licensed electrical contractor; and one licensed plumbing or mechanical contractor. Members must be knowledgeable in the following Collier County Codes: Florida Building Codes, Electrical Code, Fire Prevention Code, Gas Code, Mechanical Code and Swimming Pool Code. Terms are four years. This is a Quasi -Judicial Board. The Contractors Licensing Board has one vacancy, and three seats expiring in June. Applicants should be either a licensed architect, a licensed general contractor, a licensed engineer, a licensed electrical contractor, a licensed plumbing contractor, a licensed mechanical contractor, a licensed roofing contractor, a licensed residential, or a licensed building contractor. This nine -member board was created to determine the qualifications of applicants for the various categories of the Contractors' Certificates of Competency. They also hold hearings to determine if a certificate of competency of any contractor, master or journeyman should be revoked. Terms are three years. This is a Quasi -Judicial Board. The Floodplain Management Planning Committee has a vacancy for a citizen representative residing in the following area: southwest Collier County (along the US 41 corridor and south 951). The committee reviews and provides recommendations for floodplain management regulations, and for surface water and watershed management issues brought before it including, but not limited to, matters dealing with water quality and quantity. They will also develop and, at least annually, evaluate and update the Collier County Floodplain Management Plan. Members serve at the will of the County Manager. The Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee has one vacancy. This five -member committee advises and recommends as to the beautification and maintenance of landscape improvements within the road right of way as described by ordinance boundaries. The committee shall prepare an itemized budget of the amount of money required to carry out the business of the committee for the next fiscal year. Members must be residents of one of the following precincts: 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, and part of 322. Terms are four years. The Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board has one vacancy. Members must reside within the boundaries of the Golden Gate Community Center Municipal Services Special Taxing District. This five -member committee advises the Board of County Commissioners on the budget and operation of the Golden Gate Community Center. Terms are three years. The Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee has one seat expiring in October. This five -member committee was created to carry out the various requirements and provisions of an Agreement relating to land conveyed to the County by Avatar Properties, Inc. (f/k/a GAC Properties, Inc.). Members must reside within one of the 5 phases within the Golden Gate Estates area. Terms are four years. The Immokalee Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee has one seat expiring in September. Applicants must own a business or commercial property in the MSTU or must represent a non-profit operating in the MSTU. This seven -member committee assists the Board of County Commissioners in the business affairs of the Immokalee Beautification Taxing District and prepares and recommends an itemized budget to carry out the business of the district for each fiscal year. Terms are four years. The Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee has three seats expiring in October. This five -member committee prepares and recommends an itemized budget for the Lely Golf Estates Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit and aids and assists the Board of County Commissioners in carrying out the services of the taxing unit. Members must reside within the boundaries of the Municipal Service Taxing Unit. Terms are four years. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has a vacancy representing the Naples and Urban Area Community Park District. This seven -member committee advises the BCC on any matters concerning acquisition, development and programs involving parks and recreation facilities in Collier County. Membership consists of one member from the Immokalee Community Park District and six members from the Naples and Urban Area Community Park District. Terms are four years. The Vanderbilt Beach Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee has one seat expiring in November. Members must be permanent residents within the MSTU boundaries. This committee assists the BCC in carrying out the purposes of the MSTU, prepares and recommends to the BCC an itemized budget for the MSTU, and recommends work programs and priorities to the County Manager. Terms are 4 years. How to Apply: To apply for an advisory committee vacancy, submit an application online at hhtt -ps://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/advisory-boards/online- advisory-board-application. After you complete the application, click on "Submit Form." To receive an immediate e-mail confirmation that your application was received, you must include your e-mail address in the application. Residents interested in applying for advisory committee positions may also obtain an application by calling (239) 252-8400, or from https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=25235. Please email to DL-AdvisoryBoardOn- LineAnnlicationsna.colliercountyfl gov, or mail to the attention of Wanda Rodriguez, County Attorney's Office, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800, Naples, Florida 34112-5746. Please feel free to share this information. Additionally, Collier County is continually updating their Facebook and Twitter pages (see attached links) tQ.GI:0001C.l.V 111/I.UII1l;IVVV &,twltter.com/l,uiiicir.-1 8 Share ® Twee HForward Copyright © I YEAR* Penny Taylor, Commissioner, District 4, All rights reserved. Thank you for your interest in District 4 news and updates. Our mailing address is: Penny Taylor, Commissioner, District 4 3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite 303 Naples, FL 341192 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list ®❑ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 10/29/21, 10:11 AM Collier County Government on Twitter: "TONIGHT: Visit our public meeting regarding the Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study.... F Tweet Q Search Twitter $$ Explore ��= Collier County Government Q New to Twitter? @CollierGov AW Sign up now to get your own pers no Settings TONIGHT: Visit our public meeting regarding the Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. We'll be showing the v Sign up with G project concepts to widen the roadway from 2-lanes to 4-lanes. For more info, visit bit.ly/3d2ZSVF (under i Sign up with E "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") Sign up with phone By signing up, you agree to the Te MEETING LOCATION 01 Privacy Policy, including Cookie L Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021 5 p.m. to 7 pp.m. - University of Florida) IFAS Extension Office Multippurpose Room Relevant people 14700 Immokalee Road 11J Naples, FL 34120 g 1 Collier County Goi m OIL WELL R6 - @CollierGov AW Official Twitter C of MOKALEE RO IaAaoniLewo Government. Down 0 STUDY T - 331 app and call us AREA 8999. neNGarnawe �Ilili- - What's happening JJ News •This morning t Gigi Hadid and Zayn Malik ways after alleged incident 9:14 AM • Oct 27, 2021 • Sprout Social Yolanda Hadid Trending with Yolanda Q T-1 d u ® Daily Echo Q • Yesterday Extinction Rebellion prote<. Fawley Refinery • ETimesTV • 1 hour ago Kannada superstar Puneet Rajkumar passes away at 4 look at the actor's stint on Entertainment • Trending Winona Ryder 4,961 Tweets News • 2 hours ago Biden meets Pope Francis pressure from US bishops i abortion rights Trending with Pope, Vatican Show more Terms of Service Privacy Policy Ads info More ••• @ 2021 Twit https://mobile.twitter.com/CollierGov/status/1453349398730186757 1/1 10/29/21, 10:12 AM WINK News on Twitter: "Collier County is considering widening several roads, including Wilson Boulevard. On Wednesday nigh... V F Tweet Q Search Twitter # Explore w WINK News ••• @winknews no Settings Collier County is considering widening several roads, including Wilson Boulevard. On Wednesday night, Collier will discuss doubling the boulevard's lanes from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road, taking it from a two-lane roadway to a four-way one. winknews.com Collier County considers widening Wilson Boulevard; public meeting Wednesda... Collier County is considering widening several roads, including Wilson Boulevard. On Wednesday night, county leaders will discuss doubling the boulevard's lane... 9:00 AM • Oct 27, 2021 • Twitter Web App Q T-1 Z� U New to Twitter? Sign up now to get your own pers v Sign up with G i Sign up with E Sign up with phone By signing up, you agree to the Te Privacy Policy, including Cookie L Relevant people w WINK News @winknews Southwest Florida'; Have a news tip? LE tips@winknews.cor What's happening News • Last night Gigi Hadid and Zayn Malik ways after alleged incident Yolanda Hadid Trending with Yolanda • ETimesTV - 1 hour ago Kannada superstar Puneet Rajkumar passes away at 4 look at the actor's stint on HuffPost UK 0 • 4 hours ag Here's How To Check Your Breasts For Lumps News • 2 hours ago Biden meets Pope Francis pressure from US bishops i abortion rights Trending with Pope, Vatican Politics • Trending #LyingLiz 14.61K Tweets Show more Terms of Service Privacy Policy Ads info More ••• @ 2021 Twit https://mobile.twitter.com/winknews/status/1453345745172525057 1/1 Appendix 1.2 Meeting Materials NEWSLETTER #1 Wilson qule alyd Widening Corridor Study Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane (existing) to a four -lane roadway with curb and gutter, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). The study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements (addition of bus stop pads, etc.). Additional project elements include intersection access changes, drainage system upgrades, existing bridge replacement, utility relocations, and right-of-way acquisition. YOU'RE INVITED IM Collier County invites you to participate in the upcoming 27 Public Information Meeting for the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study. The public meeting will be held 0on Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Univer ' 'ce, Mulitpurpose Room, 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, F 34120. The purpose of thisLOCATION meeting is to provide the publi Wed s sday, actpp27, 2021 m. with an opportunity to revie University of Florida! and comment on the projec IFAS Extension Office alternatives. The meetingwill be Multi urpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road conducted in an informal, open Naples, FL 34120 house setting with no formal presentation. The study team will be available during the meeting to answer your questions. With it11 MOKAI_EE RD the Centers for Disease Control recommendations for social — 'P. distancing in mind, a limited = number of people will be able to enter the meeting room a ' GOLDEN GATE BLVI one time (approximately 30 people). It is recommended tha everyone attending the meeting In person, wear a tace mas o preven the spread of COVID-19. As an alternative to attending the meeting in person, you can view the meeting displays and handouts posted on the county's website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") beginning Oct. 20, 2021. Your input is very important, and we encourage you to either review the latest project information on the county's website or attend the public information meeting. Either way, please share your comments. Comment cards will be available in both digital (online) and paper (at the meeting) formats. The public comment period will end Nov. 5, 2021. in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded with the design and right-of-way acquisition phases scheduled to begin during Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, and the construction phase in FY 2024. El condado de Collier esta Ilevando a Cabo el Estudio del corredor de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard para evaluar las alternativas para ampliar Wilson Boulevard de una carretera de 2 carriles (existente) a una de 4 carriles con acera y cuneta, entre Golden Gate Boulevard y Immokalee Road (aproximadamente 3.2 millas). El estudio incluye la evaluacion de alineaciones alternativas para mejorar la movilidad, mejorar la seguridad y acomodar los volumenes de trafico futuros, mientras se evita o minimiza los impactos a la comunidad y al medio ambiente. Las mejoras propuestas tambien incluyen la adicion de aceras, un Camino de use compartido y carriles para bicicletas para mejorar la movilidad multimodal, asi como mejoras en las paradas de autobus (adicion de almohadillas de la parada de autobus, etc.). Los elementos adicionales del proyecto incluyen cambios en el acceso en las intersecciones, mejoras al sistema de drenaje, reemplazo del puente existente, reubicacion de servicios pOblicos y adquisicion de derecho de paso. ESTAN INVITADOS El condado de Collier to invita a participar en la proxima Reunion de Informacion Publica para el Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard. La publica reunion se Ilevara a Cabo el miercoles, 27 de octubre de 2021, a partir de las 5 p.m. hasta las 7 o.m. en la Extension OF / IFAS en 14700 Immokalee Road en Naples, FL 34120. El proposito de esta reunion es brindarle al publico la oportunidad de revisar y comentar sobre las alternativas �— del proyecto. La reunion se Ilevara a Cabo en un ambiente informal de puertas abiertas sin a presentacion formal. El equipo de estudio estara disponible OIL WELL Rt} durante la reunion para responder a sus preguntas. RANDALL BLVD Con las recomendaciones de los Centros para el Control STUDY T de Enfermedades y el AREA Departamento de Salud para el dlstanciamiento social en l — mente, un numero limitado de personas podra ingresar a la sala de reuniones a la yez (aproximadamente 30 personas). Se recomienda que todas las personas que asistan a la reunion en persona usen una mascarilla para evitar la propagacion de COVID-19. Como alternativa a asistir a la reunion en persona, las exhibiciones y los folletos de la reunion se publicaran en el sitio web del condado en www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (en "Actual - Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de Wilson Blvd.") a partir del 20 de octubre de 2021. Formularios de comentarios estaran disponibles en la Reunion de Informacion Publica, asi como en el sitio web del condado. Su opinion es muy importante y Io alentamos a que revises la informacion mas reciente del proyecto en el sitio web del condado o asista a la Reunion de Informacion Publica. De cualquier manera, comparta sus comentarios. El periodo de comentarios pOblicos finalizara el 5 de noviembre de 2021. C.ALCNUAKIV UtL rKVTCC.IV be preve que este tstualo se completara en diciembre de 2021 y se presentara ante la Junta de Comisionados del Condado a fines de 2021 o principios de 2022 para su aprobacion. El proyecto esta financiado actualmente en el Plan de Mejoramiento del Transporte de la Organizacion de Planificacion Metropolitana de Collier con las fases de diseno y adquisicion de derechos de paso que comenzaran durante el ano fiscal 2021, y la fase de construccion en el ano fiscal 2024. www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current - Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") Co ier County Project Manager, Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT One of the most important aspects of a study is public involvement. It is very important for you to be able to provide your comments related to the proposed improvements. We use a variety of methods for you to stay involved in the process such as public meetings, small group meetings, and a project website. In addition, Collier County mails notifications to all property owners within the study area as well as to agencies and local officials prior to the public meeting. PROJECT CONTACT We encourage you to participate in the Wilson Boulevard Widenin Corridor Study and invite your questions and commenils. If you have questions regarding the project, please contact: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Lorraine Lantz, Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite # 103 Naples, FL 34104 PARTICIPACION PUBLICA Uno de los aspectos mas importantes del estudio es la participacion publica. Es muy importante que ustedes puedan aportar sus comentarios sobre las mejoras propuestas. Se usaran una variedad de met000s para que ustedes sigan participando en el proyecto, tal como reuniones publicas, reuniones en grupos pequenos y en un sitio web del proyecto. Adicionalmente, el Condado de Collier enviara por correo notificaciones a todos los duenos de propiedades dentro del area de estudio y a las agencias y funcionarios locales antes de las reuniones publicas. CONTACTO DEL PROYECTO Los invitamos a pp�a�rticipar en el Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de 1Nilson Boulevard y a hacernos Ilegar sus preguntas y comentarios. Si tienen alguna pre unta relacionada con el proyecto, por favor pongase en conlacto con: Phone (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFl.gov Two or more members of the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) may be present and participate at this meeting. The subject matter of this meeting may be an item for discussion and action at a future BCC meeting. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or other reasonable accommodations to participate in this proceeding, should contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112, or 239-252-8380 as soon as possible. Such reasonable accommodations will be provided at no cost to the individual. Dos o mas miembros de la Junta de Comisionados del Condado (BCC, por sus siglas en ingles) pueden estar presentes y participar en esta reunion. El tema de esta reunion puede ser un tema de discusion y accion en una futura reunion del BCC. Cualquier persona que requiera ayuda o servicio auxiliar para tener comunicacion eficaz, u otras adaptaciones razonables para participar en este procedimiento, debe comunicarse con la Division de Administracion de Instalaciones del Condado de Collier ubicada en 3335 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112, 6 239-252-8380 como tan pronto como sea posible. Tales adaptaciones razonables se proporcionaran sin costo alguno para el individuo. Wilson BLVD. Public Meeting Proposed -Layout October 27, 2021 Capacity: 30 ± People 15 ± Staff Tables: 40 12' x 6' Stanchions/Roping: Approx. 75 LF c V) L � - ENTRANCE md � � � •tip •.k � � �. ,. R'ESTRO M k SIGN IN" TER EXIT STORAGE ROOM 9acobs Rpff- WHIM on ayule a Widening Corridor Study PUBLIC INFORMATION FACTSHEET Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for wid- ening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane (existing) to a four -lane roadway with curb and gutter, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). This study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffi volumes, while avoiding or min- imizing impacts to the community and natural environment. The Recommended Alternative will be presented to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. PrQneict PUrposeapd Need The widening of Wilson Boulevard is needed to improve safety, traffic flow, and to better connect the overall traffic network in the Golden Gate Estates area as follows • Immokalee Road which can no longer be widened, experiences significant congestion; Golden Gate Boulevard is policy constrained to four lanes and experiences congestion • Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) Extension which will cross Wilson Boulevard between 10th Avenue NW and 12th Avenue NW, will help relieve congestion along Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boule- vard • Travelers will use Wilson Boulevard to access VBR Extension, and therefore more traffic is anticipate on Wilson Boulevard • Wilson Boulevard will also act as a parallel traffi reliever to Collier Boulevard to the west • Wilson Boulevard will be the first 4-lane roadway east of Collier Boulevard; there are no other 4-lane north -south roadways east of Collier Boulevard today The proposed typical section includes 2, ments to be considered include Drovidin, • Addition of a 10-ft-wide shared -use pathway along the east side • Addition of 5-ft-wide dedicated bike lanes , adjacent to the north - and south -bound travel lanes O • Addition of a 6-ft-wide W I sidewalk on the west o I side a • Addition of bus stop pads at the existing bus stops Other improvements in- �,• clude: • Drainage upgrades to improve the overall wa ter quality in the area • New 4-lane bridge ove the Cypress Canal Acal Section . 11-ft-wide travel lanes in each direction. Additional project improve - PROPOSED 165' RIGHT OF WAY 'RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS/DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT TO CHANGE DURING DESIGN More in an be found at:� www.coiliercountyfl.gov/i)lanninc4..,— (under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") Data collection Develop Initial Alternatives --------------- Evaluate and Refine Viable Alternatives Draft Study Documents ---------------- Finalize Study Documents Public Involvement Public Information Meeting ` Meeting Desi4ri Proc rement Begins Final Rpcbrnmendation 'ended to provide information on key milestones. The dates a� Study Milestone 1� Design Procurement Begins V � r � Frequently Asked Questions Does this project include lighting? The project proposes lighting improvements at the intersections along Wilson Boulevard to meet FDOT crite- ria. There is a survey and comment form online and available as handouts at tonight's meeting for feedback on whether you would prefer lighting along the entire project corridor or at the intersections (or cross streets) only. It looks like you will be impacting my property. Will I be compensated? The Collier County Right of Way Acquisition Section of the County Growth Management Department will con- tact impacted property owners when the right-of-way phase for the project begins. Personnel from the Coun- ty Right of Way Acquisition Section are here at tonight's meeting to answer your questions about the process for handling project impacts to residences. Will a noise study be included in this project? All impacts are reviewed in the context of the needed improvement, including noise. A noise study will be performed during the design phase; however, noise walls are not anticipated based on the proximity of the road and the access required to the numerous driveways and cross streets along the project corridor. What are the changes to access management? The proposed typical section includes a raised 22-foot-wide median. Therefore, U-turn accommodations are proposed at each intersection, similar to Golden Gate Boulevard. Left -turn -only and right -turn -only lanes are also proposed at each intersection along Wilson Boulevard. Between Golden Gate Boulevard and 10th Avenue NW, U-turn accommodations are proposed approximately every 0.3 miles since there are no inter- sections/cross streets along this segment. What are the next steps for the project? After the receipt of all public comments, the project concepts and documents will be updated to reflect pu - lic input, and the finalized recommendations will be submitted to the BCC for approval. Once approved, the Corridor Study planning phase of the project is complete. The next phases that follow are the project design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. The County's Five-year Work Program includes funding for the design and right-of-way acquisition phases beginning in Fiscal Year 2022, and funding for the construction phase in Fiscal Year 2024. More informa ion 513out trus s u y can Se Touncl at: www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies CPie,� Co"Vitty (under "Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study") Growth Management Department Wilson Boulevard Widening *Name *Address *City, State, Zip *Phone Number *Email Please return comments to: Growth Management Department Attn: Connie Deane, Community Liaison \ 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 You may also send your comments via e-mail to: Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov Please provide your comments below. If more space is needed, please use an additional sheet of paper. You may place your comments in the "Comment Box" provided at the meeting, or send to Connie Deane at the address above by Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. Emailed comments are also acceptable. Evaluation Yes ❑ No 1. Did this meeting provide you with sufficient information on the proposed improvements? If not, what additional information do you need to know? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Was the facility appropriate for this meeting? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Was this meeting productive? ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. Was the format of this meeting effective? 5. How did you hear about this project? ❑ Email ❑ Social Media ❑ Roadway Message Sign ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other *Please be advised - this information is used to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain form including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. We are looking for your input to assist with planning and designing the best roadway to serve drivers of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. Please help us identify important issues to consider during this study by answering a few questions below. 1. Do you live in the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? ❑ Yes ❑ Nn 2. Do you live within one (1) mile of the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. How often do you use Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road? ❑ Daily ❑ Weekly ❑ Other 4. Do you consider yourself to be a "year-round" or "seasonal" resident? ❑ Seasonal ❑ Year-round 5. What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply. ❑ No Problems ❑ Safety ❑ Congestion ❑ Poor Visibility (Lighting) ❑ Speeding Vehicles ❑ Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes ❑ Lack of Transit Options ❑ Other 5. The proposed improvements would require lighting at all the intersections (or cross streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would you prefer lighting along the entire roadway or just at the intersections (or cross streets)? ❑ Lighting along entire roadway ❑ Lighting only at intersections/cross streets 6. Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? Note: The project's current budget allows for sod in the non -paved areas. ❑Yes, in the median ❑Yes, along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk ❑ Both in the median and along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk ❑ No Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. JIM �`- cot, cGOUHLy Y1Jilson Boulevard widening „tie , Corridor Study Appendix 1.3 Sign In Sheets IN Social Media Mailing I �y, % u' ` Website �� Other .JCO � QI'l ' / �37 0 Ore �Q!'J `�/ t rV I +e t rL 3��v� Q s�jdln r%1 7a���mF, CU I�'i El Social Media ?' � ���� � W�7� + Mailing L 2}� Al-% �T C_l Website Other Ave- Nw ❑V�p'� �� 1I —(J 1 ZL►lvi,c�� 'kb V cti1^41 J . r^-- Social Media �J ❑ Mailing �i Website ❑ Other �(Z 6n/e t) �Y �" d` �T(� V v 'A0 1 A 0V I �T ► 1 L' Social Media L_� Mailing Website Other Social Medial �_ � Mailing r/i �r4wke, J Website �� Other Mr 4 M6')d v d tO66 zq Social Media Mailing Website L Other Lt 07 Social Media �� Mailing l .J Website Other `( �� `-'lJ `e Social Media �_� Mailing \ l l u Website Other Social Media Mailing Website �- Other Social Media Mailing LL Website Other U Social Media ❑ Mailing Website Other n Social Media ❑ Mailing Website Other Social Media Mailing �L Website LL Other 4 Social Media Mailing Website Other i � Social Media ] [_� Mailing �- Website LJ Other ***Please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. Ifyou do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Website for additional information. Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting 0 Oct. 27, 2021 0 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. 0 UF/IFAS Extension Office (Multipurpose Room) 0 14700 Immokalee Road 0 Naples, FIL 34120 PRINT)Wilson How did you hear Name (PLEASE about this meeting?Phone '•PRINT) Number Title • Social Media Mailing Website i Other r le L-� L {�Lf + W C 1 ? D �J/Q J Social Media % Mailing Website Other r !l�'A , [ 9 �I��"/ SN 13 /Y�. /t,P 3 �)2o Social Media ❑ Mailing k� + WebsiteJ Other LJ Social Media L_ I Mailing Website U Other k r-- �� Social Media Mailing WebsiteOther �� r Social Media .._J Mailing Website Other I�^, � � Sl%� e to e � r � n 1 7 3 � -Z&q Q 1i-V � ► V � ,, I ,, o f R t 4 , I i Sli\ &CcAm c ck4. c�/ Z3� . �p 1i A � %0 d Social Media I__-� Mailing u Website L] Other Q h • ��j G C� r f (`l �h� f� l �r c�s�Ge �s C, Social Media E] Mailing U Website Other r�%�/ Social Media Mailing Website Other kv\ _ Media Social _ �_] Mailing Website Other' LJ Social Media ❑ Mailing L Website U Other G�'i d� �►.� 2 L� °p Social Media Mailing Website Other U Social Media j] Mailing Website LJ Other Social Media Mailing Website Other Social Media �j Mailing Website Other 'Please be advised' The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. 1W11111111 7 Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting 0 Oct.27,2021 0 5p.m.to7p.m. 0 UF/IFAS Extension Office (Multipurpose Room) 0 14700 Immokalee Road 0 Naples,FL34 PRINT)Wilson How did you hear Name (PLEASE about this meeting?Phone - A..PRINT) Number Title / Organization ❑ Social Media ❑ Mailing . ❑ Website L� Other 11� 1 �-2 l L� V � � t2� /4j% � 'ry �, ��_ / �� G U I'j� � 1L111w> ✓✓� L/1 �s� . /.L �j rr/l L J Social Media .� Mailing ❑ Website ❑ Other y l V j'v 5 c--) / ��� ! CS Ut^- i`j I l%}J �% . 3yl L� 3 S/IC�LJ� �..CIWI/ �l►�I�T� Cov` ❑ Social Media ❑ Mailing �J J WN-•' Y fJ 1� l� I�l /l �� (/r U Social Media ❑ Mailing LJ Website 1❑ Other ❑ Social Media ❑Mailing l Website � ..._I I Other �J�/If�i �Y✓C�1-•�� ✓ /� ��`3 f�f�c �" /' "� �G.S ���� ' �d�a-'rucV� 11q �Vlr�[.�+� � J L _J Social Media j❑ Mailingcc ❑ Website ❑ Other _ �j� �L F 1 Social Media ❑ Mailing Website Other ❑ ❑ C }� � �, 1"" (�I� iLU1/ �,�� % C c I lJ1 ! CC Social Media ❑ Mailing Website Other A V 1 TA� lb 7D /6 (�i 01Q:�M ❑ Social Media ❑ Mailing ❑ Website ❑ Other `/ V or\ i �1� { �I 1 �� `t �j[] �p r 6 (v� -42.1j - q 61 L_1 Social Media ❑ Mailing ❑ Website ❑ Other �1�/Y ii► 411 ���r 13 (� G r� �SO� w 6 �,I • C ✓�(s 4 ISTU l�n�ti l v l Gd"V' ���% � l dGl (�a✓18 ❑ Social Media ❑ Mailing ❑ Website �❑ Other L E k' �.q GL 1 r[ „ C' �Y�411U C, CZJ ❑ Social Media ❑ Mailing Website L I Website Other ❑ P4 �G/Vn5 �j - ✓� Q1M�J P "Jle'/::Iaty ha C ?lei A 13 L Uc�c� 6),3 � F St � L_1 Social Media ❑ Mailing` �❑ Website X Other �'t' VY\S Fe 1 1 -Q� �7 _ ❑ Social Media I _1 Mailing Website ❑ ❑Other �— ®e Go L-1 �S L_l Social Media Mailing Website ❑ Other/Y1 V!'► G1 nzc.� G� 1'! h ***Please be advised*** I/ The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. 16�SIGN IN Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting 0 Oct. 27, 2021 0 5 to 7 UF/lFAS Extension Office (Multipurpose Room) 0 14700 Immokalee Road 0 Naples, FL 34120 How did you hear about this meeting? PRINT)Wilson Name (PLEASE PRINT) ..PRINT) Phone Number Title Organization ❑11 Social Media ❑Mailing _J Website - Other n 2 �.fi'1 3 t ST-S:T ee �� w 3 q -Y� 8a _ _3 Social Media _� Mailing r 1 Website ❑ Other e [a_ 1 ��L LL T r �(� �IQ a!` WL�� �fll i ✓� 1 �} �� L(-L 'T�" w � CC)#Wcyg6T i �3 9— 3w— �Yo'/ ❑ Social Media ❑ Mailing j Website J Other G, �%j l 5 `i (� n �� / `� �] %/" �N �? N r l ►° ��:ToN a.' _ c Social Media I� Mailing Website �J Other S •t�rt�1� 'y7 U ( LA) 1 �, 1 '� - KJSi��I���C'aV�C4l�� Social Media ❑ Mailing r❑ I. Website Other 1 Kf /l I `e `✓ ( 17 1 V e N% ------- ❑ Social Media 1 g Mailin ❑ Website ❑Other [__l Social Media Mailing ❑ Website Other ❑ Social Media �.....� Mailing ❑ Website ❑ Other .1 Social Media ❑ Mailing ❑ Website , Other Ll Social Media Mailing l Website 1 Other ❑ Social Media D Mailing ❑ Website -] Other ❑ Social Media ❑ Mailing Ll Website ❑ Other Social Media ❑ Mailing ❑ Website I J Other Social Media ❑ Mailing ❑ Website L -1 Other ❑ Social Media F._ Mailing �❑ Website ❑ Other ***Please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Name (PLEASE PRINT) Ahmad, Jay Public Information Meeting 0 • 1 Mailing Address (PLEASE PRINT) Collier Count' Collier County Collier County Office/Immokalee Road Naples,1 Email Address (PLEASE PRINT) Title Organization Arnold, Michelle Bosch, Rob i Bullert, Ben Collier County �r Davis, Vanessa JACOBS De Ciccio, Nick JACOBS Collier County Deane, Connie J? DeLeon, Omar Collier County Francois, Diana ; JACOBS JACOBS Gramer, Bill Heldorfer, Kevin JACOBS Khawaja, Tony �-'kI� Collier County Kirby, Felicia -_ JACOBS Lantz, Lorraine Collier County Collier County Libby, Pam ***Please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. P?TrFF SIGN IN 1 Lunsford, Nathan JACOBS JACOBS Collier County Martin, Joe McCoy, Dennis McLaughlin, Anne —Collier MPO McLean, Matt Collier County Messam, Marlene Collier County Ortiz Rosado, Elena Collier County Collier MPO Otero, Brandy Ross, Colleen JACOBS Sawyer, Mike Collier County Silvert, Tom Collier County Collier County Scott, Trinity Soriano, Liz L Collier County d.p lfikk4j& , 655am o f er 4 ��tA �(0k5 , qGi _'f k W l/-- :efI,- 'Please be advised' The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public Information Meeting • Oct. 27, 2021 • 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. • OF/IFAS Extension Office (Multipurpose Name (PLEASE PRINT) Mailing Address (PLEASE PRINT) Email Address (PLEASE PRINT) Room) • 14700 Immokalee Road • Naples, FL 34120 Title / Organization **"Please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. Appendix 1.4 Public Comments We are looking for your input to assist with planning and designing the best roadway to serve drivers of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. Please help us identify important issues to consider during this study by answering a few questions below. 1. Do you live in the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and lmmo ee Road)? es ❑ No 2. Do you live within one (1) mile of the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? es ❑ No 3. How often do you use Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road? aily ❑Weekly ❑ Other 4. Do you consider yours to be a "year-round" or "seasonal" resident? ❑ Seasonal Year-round 5. What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply. ❑ No Problems ❑ Safety ❑ Congestion ❑ Poor Visibility (Lighting) ❑ Speeding Vehicles LIB Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes ❑ Lack of Transit Options ❑ Other L (T ()�:)S( A 5. The proposed improvements would require lighting at all the intersections (or cross streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would you prefer lighting along the entire roadway or just at the inters ctions (or cross streets)? El Lighting along entire roadway Lighting only at intersections/cross streets 6. Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? Note. The project's current budget allows for sod in the non -paved areas. ❑Yes, in the median es, along the shared -use pathway and side�Walk [I Both in the median and alolg the Sharree d- I I � g Shared -use pathway and sidewalk ❑ No Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Cerifk.•r Cuurul' Wilson BOU[evard Widening ------ VI[ilson 9oulm�arc� Widening C.r-INH. .aiy Name *Address W *City, State, Zip —I�t oL�s VC *Phone Number *Email I(I Please return comments to: Growth Management Department Attn: Connie Deane, Community Liaison 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 You may also send your comments via e-mail to: Connie. Deane@colliercountyfl.gov Please provide your comments below. If more space is needed, please use an additional sheet of paper. You may place your comments in the "Comment Box" provided at the meeting, or send to Connie Deane at the address above by Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. Emailed comments are also acceptable. Evaluation Yes ❑ No 1. Did this meeting provide you with sufficient information on the proposed improvements? If not, what additional information do you need to know? VesNo 2. Was the facility appropriate for this meeting? No 3. Was this meeting productive? No 4. Was the format of this meeting effective? 5. How did you hear about this project? Email Social Media EfRoadway Message Sign U.S. Mail Other *Please be advised - this information is used to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain form including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information- We are looking for your input to assist with planning and designing the best roadway to serve drivers of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. Please help us identify important issues to consider during this study by answering a few questions below. 1. Do you live in the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? .Yes ❑ No 2. Do you live within one (1) mile of the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? 'Iles ❑ No 3. How often do you use Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road? 'Daily El (❑ Other 4. Do you consider yourself to be a "year-round" or "seasonal" resident? []Seasonal Year-round 5. What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply. ❑ No Problems ❑ Safety ❑ Congestion ❑ Poor Visibility (Lighting) Speeding Vehicles?,Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes ❑ Lack of Transit Options ❑ Other 5. The proposed improvements would require lighting at all the intersections (or cross streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would you prefer lighting along the entire roadway or just at the intersections (or cross streets)? Lighting along entire roadway ❑ Lighting only at intersections/cross streets 6. Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? Note: The project's current budget allows for sod in the non -paved areas. ❑Yes, in the median El Yes, along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk Both in the median and along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk ❑ No Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. �� rd cR . c.,aen�r ll�ilsan BouEeva Widening .':-jr riiiur StUdy '....Frxraf rrk,.nma Wilson�arJ Widening "Name *Address Val *City, State, Zip Z *Phone Number *Email n04 iA2fC_,64 0J44 q Please return comments to: Growth Management Department Attn: Connie Deane, Community Liaison 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 You may also send your comments via e-mail to: Connie. Deane@colliercountyfl.gov Please provide your comments below. If more space is needed, please use an additional sheet of paper. You may place your comments in the "Comment Box" provided at the meeting, or send to Connie Deane at the address above by Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. Emailed comments are also acceptable. V � l Yam- WlP1f� 6eJJ ✓� �. h p- Evaluation Yes No 1. Did this meeting provide you with sufficient information on the proposed improvements? If not, what additional information do you need to know? WYe No 2. Was the facility appropriate for this meeting? Yes No 3. Was this meeting productive? ues1-1 No 4. Was the format of this meeting effective? 5. How did you hear about this project? Email ❑ Social Media Roadway Message Sign U.S. Mail Other *Please be advised - this information is used to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain form including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. We are looking for your input to assist with planning and designing the best roadway to serve drivers of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. Please help us identify important issues to consider during this study by answering a few questions below. 1. Do you live in the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? Yes ❑ No 2. Do you live within one (1) mile of the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? 'Oyes ❑ No 3. How often do you use Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road? aily ❑ Weekly ❑ Other 4. Do you consider yourself to be a "year-round" or "seasonal" resident? []Seasonal )Oear-round 5. What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply. ❑ No Problems ❑ Safety ❑ Congestion Argoor Visibility (Lighting) A16p Vehicles ;%Cack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes ❑ Lack of Transit ❑ptions ❑ Other 5. The proposed improvements would require lighting at all the intersections (or cross streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would you prefer lighting along the entire roadway or just at the intersections (or cross streets)? ighting along entire roadway ❑ Lighting only at intersections/cross streets 6. Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? Note: The project's current budget allows for sod in the non -paved areas. ❑Yes, in the median ❑Yes, along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk )�4oth in the median and along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk ❑ No Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. lfie Cr C- GY an Boulevard Widening -Cn-�—�--� v�rrr��-ir :..i��i •. cc„m �-�suxmm�.r..e�..� Vyiison 80ulevarJ Widening ly *Name, 47 6-6-2t Vu Rld Q-2cl *Address � LID t (50 N 8 LLa I v *City State Zip FL 3 V-1 20 *Phone Number as *Email ma`s N o �C�✓Y� Please return comments to: Growth Management Department Attn: Connie Deane, Community Liaison 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 You may also send your comments via e-mail to: Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov Please provide your comments below. If more space is needed, please use an additional sheet of paper. You may place your comments in the "Comment Box" provided at the meeting, or send to Connie Deane at the address above by Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. Emailed comments are also acceptable. of-0 Evaluation 15Yes No 1. Did this meeting provide you with sufficient information on the proposed improvements? If not, what additional information do you need to know? © Yes No 2. Was the facility appropriate for this meeting? `Yes No 3. Was this meeting productive? IXYes ❑ No 4. Was the format of this meeting effective? 5. How did you hear about this project? 11 Email ❑ Social Media ,Roadway Message Sign U.S. Mail Other *Please be advised - this information is used to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain form including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. We are looking for your input to assist with planning and designing the best roadway to serve drivers of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. Please help us identify important issues to consider during this study by answering a few questions below. 1. Do you live in the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and lmm kalee Road)? s ❑ No 2. Do you live within one (1) mile of the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? vy�es ❑ No 3. How often do you use Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road? wily ❑ Weekly ❑ Other 4. Do you consider yourself to be a "pear -round" or "seasonal" resident? asonal ear-roun� _ 5. What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply. [S�No Problems ❑ Safety ❑ Congestion ❑ Poor Visibility (Lighting) ❑ Speeding Vehicles ❑ Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes ❑ Lack of Transit Options ❑ Other 5. The proposed improvements would require lighting at all the intersections (or cross streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would you prefer lighting along the entire roadway or just at the intersections (or cross streets)? ❑ Lighting along entire roadway k6ghting only at intersections/cross streets C5Q(4 6. Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? Note: The project's current budget allows for sod in the non -paved areas. ❑Yes, in the median ❑Yes, along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk ❑ Both in the median and along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk No Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. 1�{il o� n 8oulavar� Widening Wllson�ard Widening *Name *Address *City, State, Zip *Phone Number *Email Please return comments to: Growth Management Department Attn: Connie Deane, Community Liaison 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 You may also send your comments via e-mail to: Connie. Deane@colliercountyfl.gov Please provide your comments below. If more space is needed, please use an additional sheet of paper. You may place your comments in the "Comment Box" provided at the meeting, or send to Connie Deane at the address above by Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. Emailed comments are also acceptable. �rru<-ate Evaluation ❑ Yes11 No 1. Did this meeting provide you with sufficient information on the proposed improvements? If not, what additional information do you need to know? Yes No 2. Was the facility appropriate for this meeting? Yes No 3 Was this meeting productive? ❑ Yes No 4. Was the format of this meeting effective? 5. How did you hear about this project? Email ❑ Social Media ❑ Roadway Message Sign ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other *Please be advised - this information is used to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain form including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. Co' Ter County Growth Management Department Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Comment Form We are looking for your input to assist with planning and designing the best roadway to serve drivers of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Please help us identify important issues to consider during this study by answering a few questions below. Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. 1. Contact Information: *Name *The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain form including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. 2. Contact Information: *Address, City, State, Zip L 11/8/2021 3. Contact Information: *Email Address 4. Do you live in the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? 0 Yes 0 No 5. Do you live within one (1) mile of the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? 0 Yes 0 No 6. How often do you use Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road? 0 Daily 0 Weekly 0 Other 7. Do you consider yourself to be a "year-round" or "seasonal" resident? 0 Seasonal 0 Year-round 11/8/2021 8. What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply ❑ No Problems ❑ Safety ❑ Congestion ❑ Poor Visibility (Lighting) ❑ Speeding Vehicles ❑ Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes ❑ Lack of Transit Options FMI Other 9. The proposed improvements would require lighting at all the intersections (or cross streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would you prefer lighting along the entire roadway or just at the intersections (or cross streets)? O Lighting along entire roadway O Lighting only at intersections/cross streets 10. Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? Note: The project's current budget allows for sod in the non -paved areas. O Yes, in the median O Yes, along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk O Both in the median and along the shared -use pathway and sidewalk O No 11/8/2021 11. How did you hear about this project? O Email O Social Media O Roadway Message Sign O U.S. Mail OF Other 12. Did the Collier County website provide you with sufficient information on the proposed improvements? O Yes Mm O Somewhat 13. Please provide any additional comments. You may also send your comments via e-mail to Connie Deane at Connie. Deane @colliercounty_ fl.gov (mailto:Connie.Deane @ colliercountyfl.gov) by Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. 11/8/2021 This content is neither created nor endorsed by Microsoft. The data you submit will be sent to the form owner. a Microsoft Forms 11/8/2021 11 /8/21, 8:14 AM Microsoft Forms Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Comment Form 72 Responses 1. Contact Information: *Name 06:31 Average time to complete Active Status 9 *The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain form including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county website for additional information. Q Insights Latest Responses 61 "Jill Rosenfeld " Responses "Isabel Melvin" "Dominick Morinos" 3 respondents (5%) answered Tom for this question. Stephanie westman Jennifer Bronsted Juan dote Jennifer joe bonness Brown Tom Schoeneck MARIELA JUAN Stephanie Tom Jackson Maureen Bonness Stephanie Kulakowski Zach Jackson peter Miller JUAN Tom Rollins Michon Jackson Jennifer abreu https://forms.office.com/Pages/DesignPage.aspx?origin=OfficeDotCom&lang=en-US&route=Start#Analysis=true&FormId=mHckNyzO_UKKN9Sc... 1 /5 11 /8/21, 8:14 AM Microsoft Forms 2. Contact Information: *Address, City, State, Zip Q Insights 59 Responses 13 respondents (22%) answered Naples for this question. Latest Responses "2230 1Oth Ave NE " ' 411 Sixth St South " "708 Forest Hills Blvd Naples" Blvd Naples Wilson Blvd 2nd AVE Drive Nap les Ave N t sandalwood naples 3. Contact Information: *Email Address Q Insights 61 Responses Naples FL 14th ave Street Naples St NW 10th Ave Bonita Springs Latest Responses 'jillfrosenfeld@gmail.com " "Imelvin414@aol.com" "subaquatraining @yahoo. com " 1 respondents (2%) answered mbpind@gmailcom for this question. bonness@infionlinenet greerrmegan@gmailcom mb ind Imelvin414@aolcom p @9mailcom NaRefrain ricky_sepulveda@yahoocom estates-promo@comcstnet prosborne@sbcglobaInet https://forms.office.com/Pages/DesignPage.aspx?origin=OfficeDotCom&lang=en-US&route=Start#Analysis=true&FormId=mHckNyzO_UKKN9Sc... 2/5 11 /8/21, 8:14 AM Microsoft Forms 4. Do you live in the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? Q Insights Yes 21 No 51 5. Do you live within one (1) mile of the study area (Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road)? Q Insights 'AM ObIll Yes 25 No 45 6. How often do you use Wilson Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road? Insights Daily 17 Weekly 33 oomawa w1k Other 22 7. Do you consider yourself to be a "year-round" or "seasonal" resident? Seasonal 9 Year-round 63 https://forms.office.com/Pages/DesignPage.aspx?origin=OfficeDotCom&lang=en-US&route=Start#Analysis=true&FormId=mHckNyzO_UKKN9Sc... 3/5 11 /8/21, 8:14 AM Microsoft Forms 8. What problems exist on Wilson Boulevard that should be addressed? Select all that apply. No Problems 6 5c Safety 38 s4 Congestion 27 40 Poor Visibility (Lighting) 15 30 Speeding Vehicles 28 Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes 56 20 10 Lack of Transit Options 9 on Other 10 -M 9. The proposed improvements would require lighting at all the intersections (or cross streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would you prefer lighting along the entire roadway orjust at the intersections (or cross streets)? Lighting along entire roadway 40 + Lighting only at intersections/... 31 10. Would you like to see landscaping as part of a future improvement? Note: The project's current budget allows for sod in the non -paved areas. Yes, in the median 11 Yes, along the shared -use pat... 14 Both in the median and along ... 18 No 29 https://forms.office.com/Pages/DesignPage.aspx?origin=OfficeDotCom&lang=en-US&route=Start#Analysis=true&FormId=mHckNyzO_UKKN9Sc... 4/5 11 /8/21, 8:14 AM Microsoft Forms 11. How did you hear about this project? Email 23 Social Media 20 Roadway Message Sign 7 U.S. Mail 4 0 Other 16 12. Did the Collier County website provide you with sufficient information on the proposed improvements? Q Insights 'An 1011111111�1 Yes 44 No 8 Somewhat 19 13. Please provide any additional comments. You may also send your comments via e-mail to Connie Deane at Connie. Deane @colliercounty_ fl.gov by Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. Q Insights Latest Responses 48 "1 was at the N/Ms meeting and saw the plans/diagrams. My concerns ... Responses "h ttps://mobile. twitter. com/CompletedStreet/status/145633077224002... "The bike lane should be at least five feet wide with a tire vibrating stri... 17 respondents (36%) answered road for this question. bikes or pedestrians Immokalee Road Use Golden Gate area traffic road south road Immokaleeneed sidewalk/bike Wilson Blvd road of immokalee Wilson Immokalee Rd bike lanes bicycle lanes safe for bikes improvement on the roads https://forms.office.com/Pages/DesignPage.aspx?origin=OfficeDotCom&lang=en-US&route=Start#Analysis=true&FormId=mHckNyzO_UKKN9Sc... 5/5 Contact Information: Paper Questions 1. Did *The information on this meeting provide you Paper Paper this sheet is to contact Would you like to see with sufficient Question Paper Question you regarding this Do you live within one landscaping as part of a Did the Collier County Please provide any additional information on the 2. Was Question 4. Was and future Do you live in the study (1) mile of the study How often do you use requireproject What problems exist The proposed improvements would proposed the 3. Was the public meetings. Under area (Wilson Boulevard area (Wilson Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Do you consider on Wilson Boulevard lighting at all the intersections (or cross Note: The project's with sufficient You may also send your comments via improvements? If not, facility this format of law, e-mail and Contact Information: between Golden Gate between Golden Gate between Golden yourselfFlorida Gate - what additional appropria meeting this certain home addresses -Address, Contact Information: Boulevard and Boulevard and Boulevard and round" or "seasonal" addressed? Select all Gate Boulevard to Immolcalee Road. Would for sod in the non- How did you hear proposed Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov by information do you need to for this productiv meeting Start time Completion time Email Name am public rec City, State, Zip -Email Address Immokalee Road)? Immokalee Road)? Immokalee Road? resident? that apply. you prefer lighting along t areas.ID paved to know? meeting? e? effective? We Own a house in Wilson Blvd and do not think any changes need to be 3 10/24/219:21:01 10/24/219:23:35 anonymous Tom F Joseph 7816 NW 121 WAY,PAR tomfjoseph@gmail.com Yes Yes Weekly Year-round No Problems; Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No U.S. Mail Somewhat made. Its good as is now. THIS IS AN EXCELLENT PROJECT. WHEN VANDERBILT EXT IS COMPLETE, THIS WILL REDUCE THE TRAFFIC ON GG BLVD AND ULTIMATELY ON IMMOKALEE RD 4 10/25/2114:43:28 10/25/2114:58:04 anonymous JOE 5566TH ST SE, NAPLES, JRIV2001@YAHOO.COM No Yes Daily Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Yes, in the median TV Yes AND COLLIER BLVD. With Big Cypress under construction traffic has increased in this area. It will only continue to get worse as homes 5 10/27/216:19:59 10/27/216:25:44 anonymous Karissa Holmes 6153 Triumph Lane Ave khwheeler@aol.com No Yes Weekly Year-round Safety;Congestion;Speec Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No WINK news Yes and businesses open. additional north/south lanes needed as well from randall to pine ridge... the east/west vanderbilt ext is long overdue.... 951 north from immokalee ,can it go to Bonita Beach Rd? that would be 6 10/27/217:50:50 10/27/217:55:11 anonymous Timothy OMalley 206016th St NE tj.o@aol.com Yes Yes Other Year-round Congestion;5peeding Vel Lighting along entire roadway No wink news Yes amazing 8th St NE is the only other north/south road between the Blvd and Immokalee. In order to help relieve traffic on 8th St (especially when there are accidents on the east/west corridors and 8th backs up...), I think this project could be 7 10/27/218:25:31 10/27/218:29:52 anonymous Melissa 76510th Ave NE, Naples mbpind@gmail.com No Yes Weekly Year-round Speeding Vehicles;Lack c Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, along the shared -us Social Media Yes beneficial. 8 10/27/218:53:13 10/27/219:05:14 anonymous rvenuto@kcaeng.com 6914th Street NE, Naple: rvenuto@kcaeng.com Yes Yes Daily Year-round Congestion;Lack of Sides Lighting along entire roadway No Attended-virtual-meetir Somewhat Golden Gate Estates residents need desperately an improvement on the roads. Every day traffic is congested. With all new construction There are too many vehicles on the road. 9 10/27/219:15:53 10/27/219:21:54 anonymous No Yes Weekly Year-round Congestion;Safety;Poor I Lighting along entire roadway No Social Media Somewhat 10 10/27/219:46:52 10/27/219:54:27 anonymous Wilson needs a minimum of four lanes and a bike Reachatony@yahoo.con No No Daily Year-round Safety;Congestion;Poor Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and. Social Media Somewhat I live a few miles away. A widened Wilson would not only assist daily traffic, but, when there is an issue over on Everglades or from Wilson/Immokalee to Everglades it would provide another bypass option without having to wait for 17 lights at Wilson & Golden Gate to change to move traffic through swiftly. Back-ups in that general area seem to happen more often than not. Even possibly consider a red-light camera at Wilson & Golden Gate because that might assist with some of the traffic violations as 11 10/27/2110:35:33 10/27/2110:39:20 anonymous Michon Jackson 34912nd AVE SE, Naple: busyfamilyof4@hotmail. No No Weekly Year-round Congestion;Lack of Sideu Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Winknews Yes well. That would help traffic so much, especially if it's going to eventually get 12 10/27/2110:44:46 10/27/2110:46:34 anonymous Zach Jackson 34912nd AVE SE Zacharywjackson@yaho No No Weekly Year-round Congestion;Safety; Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, along the shared -us News Yes connected to Vanderbilt Beach Road. I would more light in the area isn't enough and we are a lot of people living in this zone and the area is very dark and has ato much traffic during 13 10/27/2113:27:29 10/27/2113:39:44 anonymous maggie150701@yahoo.( Yes Yes Weekly Year-round Congestion; Lack of Tran: Lighting alongentire roadway Both in the median and q Social Media No the morning and afternoon. Main concern is that Collier County Public Utilities, Water and Sewer District (CCWSD) do not install water and sewer lines in the Wilson Blvd 14 10/27/2115:44:36 10/27/2115:49:08 anonymous Aaron Zwiefel 474114th ave SE, naple: azwief@gmail.com No No Daily Year-round No Problems; Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Email Somewhat ROW, and grant public access to canals. No sidewalks please. Most of us live on out here for the privacy. I don't want people walking by my property. Sidewalks invite people to walk by and look who otherwise wouldn't be if the sidewalks not there. We don't want that. If I wanted city things I would have stayed in the city. 4 lanes would be nice to ease traffic especially at school bus hours but other than that, 15 10/27/2117:22:51 10/27/2117:33:39 anonymous Sabrina Hamilton 1510 Wilson Blvd n Napl shearsabrina@gmail.cor Yes Yes Daily Year-round Congestion; Lighting onlyat intersections/cross streets No Roadway Message Sign No stay out. Contact Information: Paper Questions 1. Did *The information on this meeting provide you Paper Paper this sheet is to contact Would you like to see with sufficient Question Paper Question you regarding this Do you live within one landscaping as part of a Did the Collier County Please provide any additional information on the 2. Was Question 4. Was project and future Do you live in the study (1) mile ofthe study How often do you use What problems exist The proposed improvements would require future improvement? website provide you comments. proposed the 3. Was the public meetings. Under area (Wilson Boulevard area (Wilson Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Do you consider on Wilson Boulevard lighting at all the intersections (or cross Note: The project's with sufficient You may also send your comments via improvements? If not, facility this format of Florida law, e-mail and Contact Information: between Golden Gate between Golden Gate between Golden Gate yourself to be a "year- that should be streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden current budget allows information on the e-mail to Connie Deane at what additional appropria meeting this certain home addresses *Address, Contact Information: Boulevard and Boulevard and Boulevard and round" or "seasonal" addressed? Select all Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would for sod in the non- How did you hear proposed Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov by information do you need to for this productiv meeting ID Start time Completion time Email Name are public City, State, Zip *Email Address Im.okalee Road)? Immokalee Road)? Immokalee Road? resident? that apply. you prefer lighting along t paved areas. about this project? improvements? Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. o know? meeting? e? effective? Again, Wilson bridge flooding my property 5 times over last 10 years ever since Immokalee Road was widened back in 2008. Bridge needs widened and raised similar to new Sth Street bridge. I was told NO water calculations were done which would have demanded the bridge be replaced 10 years ago! This was conveyed to me by Clarance Tears who was Director South Florida Water Mamgmt District at that 16 10/27/2117:51:40 10/27/2118:00:55 anonymous Gary Hauze 280 30th Ave NE N.a. Yes Yes Daily Year-round Wilson bridge flooding n Lighting along entire roadway No Roadway Message Sign No time. 17 10/27/2118:28-.49 10/27/2118:31:07 anonymous Yes No Weekly Year-round Congestion;Lack of Sides Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Email Somewhat 18 10/27/2119:38:50 10/27/2119:50:48 anonymous Marshal Miller 24424 ave NE Marshal.Miller@Rocketr Yes Yes Daily Year-round No Problems;Ughting wi Lighting only at intersections/voss streets No Email Yes 19 10/27/21 20:14:34 10/27/21 20:24:11 anonymous Julia Denome 83112th Ave NW, Naple Runnerw3ks@gmail.con Yes Yes Other Seasonal Poor Visibility (Lighting); Lighting along entire roadway No Yes Sidewalk and shared use path is extremely important to residents of this area to facilitate alternative 20 10/28/217:13:36 10/28/217:16:02 anonymous Scott Dorris 71114th ave. NW, Napk scottdorrisl3@protonm Yes Yes Daily Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Yes, along the shared -us My own research. Somewhat transportation. I believe there are many roads in naples that need improvement, with much greater population, high traffic, 21 10/28/217:11:10 10/28/217:16:35 anonymous Rafael Martinez 1150 Oleander Drive Nal Ralph@bluedotcompute No No Other Year-round Cellular reception; Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Fox News Somewhat and use than Wilson Blvd I don't see why this would be the project on the top of your list? I have drove down immokalee road between 730am and 630pm?? The entire road of immokalee is completely backed up all the time. That fly over at immokalee and 951 should be top priority. You are putting in this beautiful Restaurant and apartment complex along with a few other complexes down the street and you're still not doing anything about the road. So all these people are going to be moving to immokalee rd and there's been no changes. It's like you build all these things and after the people come is when you try to fix the roads. Why can't we fix the roads first? I have lived here my whole life 22 10/28/218:07:21 10/28/218:13:00 anonymous Amber Widner 24006th st nw mrsamberwidner@gmai No Yes Daily Year-round No Problems; Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No News Yes something has to change. Thank you! Thank you for your help and continued help with being proactive in these growth demand problems! I strongly believe this department(s) are the most productive and best results producing department in all of Collier County areas of responsibilities. Our roads and traffic situations are amazing compared to other places in the Nation. I wish we can get 75 fixed now with on and off rams being elongated and extended to prevent slowing and people slamming 23 10/28/218:35:28 10/28/218:42:32 anonymous Brandon Magnan 5077 Tamarind Ridge Or Magnanbm@aol.com Yes Yes Other Year-round Congestion;Poor Visibilit Lighting alongentire roadway Both in the median and q Social Media No on breaks for those merging in. How much property passed the right of way are you going to purchase? How much are you paying for my fence and 24 10/28/218:38:48 10/28/218:45:58 anonymous Merrill Hibbs 2311 Wilson Blvd.N. Nar dalehibbs@gmail.com Yes Yes Daily Year-round No Problems; Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; U.S. Mail No electric gate? Another project with little or no thought for the residents or the future. What about the other ends of Wilson? Still no Hurricane escape routes onto 175 to the south. We don't want more light pollution in the Estates. Immokalee Rd lights are an example of ridiculous and unnecessary waste of electricity and huge amounts of light 25 10/28/2110:00:17 10/28/2110:09:34 anonymous David Hauenstein 703 Meyer Drive, Naples estates-promo@comcst. No Yes Weekly Year-round do not want more lights Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Roadway Message Sign No pollution. 26 10/28/2113:35:28 10/28/2113:44:24 anonymous Enrique Miranda 285 10th ave NE Naples FL. 34120 Yes Daily Year-round Poor Visibility (Lighting);. Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, in the median Roadway Message Sign Yes What is a shared use pathway? 27 10/28/2118:29:38 10/28/2118:34:18 anonymous Lisa Ettleman 2310 Wilson Blvd N Nap l elettleman@gmail.com Yes Yes Daily Year-round Safety;Poor Visibility (LIS Lighting along entire roadway Yes, along the shared -us U.S. Mail Somewhat Please make the turning radius large enough to accommodate pulling long trailers. When pulling my RV (33') 1 have to go into opposing traffic lane just to make a right onto Wilson from Immokalee. If a car is waiting at the light I have to hit the curb just to make 28 10/29/219:42:26 10/29/219:46:30 anonymous No No Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Roadway Message Sign Yes the right turn. Contact Information: Paper Questions 1. Did *The information on this meeting provide you Paper Paper this sheet is to contact Would you like to see with sufficient Question Paper Question you regarding this Do you live within one landscaping as part of a Did the Collier County Please provide any additional information on the 2. Was Question 4. Was project and future Do you live in the study (1) mile ofthe study How often do you use What problems exist The proposed improvements would require future improvement? website provide you comments. proposed the 3. Was the public meetings. Under area (Wilson Boulevard area (Wilson Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Do you consider on Wilson Boulevard lighting at all the intersections (or cross Note: The project's with sufficient You may also send your comments via improvements? If not, facility this format of Florida law, e-mail and Contact Information: between Golden Gate between Golden Gate between Golden Gate yourself to be a "year- that should be streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden current budget allows information on the e-mail to Connie Deane at what additional appropria meeting this certain home addresses *Address, Contact Information: Boulevard and Boulevard and Boulevard and round" or "seasonal" addressed? Select all Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would for sod in the non- How did you hear proposed Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov by information do you need to for this productiv meeting ID Start time Completion time Email Name are public rec City, State, Zip *Email Address Im.okalee Road)? Immokalee Road)? Immokalee Road? resident? that apply. you prefer lighting along t paved areas. about this project? improvements? Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. o know? meeting? e? effective? Wilson REALLY needs improvements for bicycles and pedestrians. Bike lanes are necessary. Ashared-use linear park would be great. There is a tremendous gap in bikable north/south roads connecting GG Blvd to other roads east 29 10/29/2111:30:33 10/29/2111:41.13 anonymous Maureen Bonness 7390 Rookery Ln, Naple! bonness@infionline.net No No Weekly Year-round Safety;Lack of Sidewalks, Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Email of Collier Blvd. There appears to be room for a multi- use pathway on both sides of the road. If it doesn't dramatically increase the cost, why not incorporate pathways on 30 10/29/2113:28:42 10/29/2113:34:38 anonymous Michelle Avola-Brown 539 Fifth Avenue South, Michelle@NaplesPathw� No No Other Year-round Safety;Lack of Sidewalks, Lighting along entire roadway Yes, a long the shared -us Email Yes both sides whenever feasible? 31 10/29/2115:46:54 10/29/2115:50:14 anonymous Don P No No Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, in the median Social Media Yes 32 10/29/2117:01:58 10/29/2117:04:59 anonymous Carrie Miller 2311st St NW Mill6d@aol.com No Yes Weekly Year-round Safety;Congestion;Poor I Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, in the median Social Media Yes It would be beneficial to have a multi- use path on both sides of the street. Please add green bicycle pavement markings at the crossings and conflict points. MMA preferred over 33 10/29/2118:16:54 10/29/2118.21.32 anonymous Sikonia@gmail.com No No Weekly Year-round Safety;Lack of Sidewalks, Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, along the shared -us Social Media Yes thermoplastic. Thank you. The proposed changes would make the road much safer for bikers and pedestrians. I try to ride my bike as often as possible for exercise and to save money on gas. Many roads in the area are not safe for bikes or pedestrians. This would be a great 34 10/29/2120:06.45 10/29/2120:12:53 anonymous Lord Martini truth.ultras_Oi@icloud.c No No Other Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting alongentire roadway Yes, alongthe shared -us Social Media Yes improvement. I do not understand the logic of bike paths immediately adjacent to high volume traffic. Why were bike lanes not moved to multi use sidewalk/bike and pathway/bike where riders would 35 10/29/2120:19:05 10/29/2120:23:08 anonymous No No Other Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Yes, along the shared -us Social Media Yes be separated from vehicle traffic. We are currently building a home on 18th Ave, off of Wilson, near Immokalee. We are building in that area because we wanted something more private, quiet, and with less traffic. Putting in 2 additional lanes now makes that road equivalent to Air- port Pulling Road, which we currently live off of. We do not want any additional lanes creating more traffic and more chances for speeding drivers. We have two small children and are concerned for their safety. We chose to build there because it wasn't a 4 lane "highway". As a future resident in 2021, we would prefer the road stay as is. 36 10/29/2121:19:34 10/29/2121:30:30 anonymous Stephanie Kulakowski 9601 Whitehall Street N; Thetalove06@gmail.con No No Other Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting a long entire roadway Yes, along the shared -us Internet Somewhat Thank you. 37 10/30/2111:41:10 10/30/2111:46-.46 anonymous Bill Adams 9045 Whimbrel Watch L biladms8@gmail.com No No Other Year-round Safety;Speeding Vehicle! Lighting along entire roadway Yes, along the shared -us Email Yes 38 10/30/2114:25:12 10/30/2114:28:28 anonymous James Taylor 795 Charlemagne Blvd N Jetaylor3@gmail.com No No Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway No Email Yes I prefer the existing 100 feet right of way easement typical section. My home was built according to the existing 50 feet right of way easement. My home would stay very near to the road if you took the proposed 165 feet 39 10/30/2115:38:57 10/30/2115:43:51 anonymous MARIEIAJUAN 1841 WILSON BLVD N0R mariela082@hotmaii.coi Yes Yes Daily Year-round short turning lanes; Lighting along entire roadway Yes, in the median Roadway Message Sign Somewhat right of way. Looking forward to enjoying the future 40 10/30/2117:05:27 10/30/2117:51:34 anonymous Juan doce 1841 Wilson Blvd Naplt juandoce1212@hotmail. Yes Yes Daily Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway No U.S. Mail Yes Proposed 165 right ofthe way. 41 11/1/217:27:25 11/1/217:33:39 anonymous Stephanie westman 32118th ave ne, naples, swdiver23@yahoo.com Yes Yes Daily Year-round Poor Visibility (Lighting); Lighting along entire roadway No news Yes 42 11/1/2113:23:36 11/1/2113:26:15 anonymous Cristin Madden 11983 Tamiami Trail Nal fidgethecat@yahoo.com No No Other Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and. Social Media Yes 43 11/1/2120:55:33 11/1/2120:58:11 anonymous Jennifer Bronsted Refrain Refrain Yes No Other Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Facebook! Yes I think this will help with some concerns for residents off wilson (buses and no lights) but it doesn't address the traffic headed west, which is initially the reason for change. At some point something else will have to be created for residents heading west to get into town. Only having White and golden gate Blvd is just not an option anymore, especially when building continues all around. Two ways out going west for thousands of people isn't efficient or acceptable, especially when shopping malls/restaurants are going up in less than 6 months surrounding the estates. It's becoming very apparent that the priorities of the county are backwards 44 11/1/2123:34:44 11/1/2123:44:50 anonymous Jennifer abreu 66117th st sw naples fl'. Abreu2lj@gmail.com No Yes Weekly Year-round Poor Visibility (Lighting); Lighting along entire roadway No Social Media Yes and not for the tax payers. Contact Information: Paper Questions 1. Did *The information on this meeting provide you Paper Paper this sheet is to contact Would you like to see with sufficient Question Paper Question you regarding this Do you live within one landscaping as part of a Did the Collier County Please provide any additional information on the 2. Was Question 4. Was project and future Do you live in the study (1) mile ofthe study How often do you use What problems exist The proposed improvements would require future improvement? website provide you comments. proposed the 3. Was the public meetings. Under area (Wilson Boulevard area (Wilson Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Do you consider on Wilson Boulevard lighting at all the intersections (or cross Note: The project's with sufficient You may also send your comments via improvements? If not, facility this format of Florida law, e-mail and Contact Information: between Golden Gate between Golden Gate between Golden Gate yourself to be a "year- that should be streets) along Wilson Boulevard, from Golden current budget allows information on the e-mail to Connie Deane at what additional appropria meeting this certain home addresses *Address, Contact Information: Boulevard and Boulevard and Boulevard and round" or "seasonal" addressed? Select all Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Would for sod in the non- How did you hear proposed Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov by information do you need to for this productiv meeting ID Start time Completion time Email Name are public rec City, State, Zip *Email Address Iminnokalee Road)? Immokalee Road)? Immokalee Road? resident? that apply. you prefer lighting along t paved areas. about this project? improvements? Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. o know? meeting? e? effective? Access to the main canal should be priority, similar to the improvements completed East of Wilson on Golden Gate Boulevard. That, particular ramp 45 11/3/217:39:58 11/3/217:43:49 anonymous Jeff Curl 40108th Ave SE, Naples, ufleff95@comcast.net No No Other Year-round Ingress/egress at South i Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No DSAC Yes is used frequently. My husband and I are bike riders and LOVE riding our bikes in neighboring Naples. We appreciate ALL road improvements to facilitate bikes and 46 11/3/218:18:19 11/3/218:21:35 anonymous Theresa Han -Markey 4171 Lake Forest Dr. Uni hanmark@umich.edu No No Other Seasonal Safety Lack of Sidewalks, Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Both in the median and; Email Yes pedestrians. 47 11/3/218:12:30 11/3/218:22:28 anonymous Tom Schoeneck 7509 San Miguel Way.: tschoeneck@aol.com No No Other Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Social Media Yes Improving would be a blessing 48 11/3/218:23:15 11/3/218:26:24 anonymous 399812th Av Ne 34120 No No Weekly Year-round Safety Lack of Sidewalks, Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, in the median Roadway Message Sign Yes 49 11/3/218:19.47 11/3/218:28:09 anonymous Ricardo Sepulveda 2107 grove drive ricky_sepulveda@yahoo No Yes Weekly Year-round Safety;Congestion;Speec Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Email Yes 50 11/3/218:28:28 11/3/218:30:50 anonymous Brian Denney 6375 Old Mahogany Ctt demey0408@gmaiLcon No No Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Yes, alongthe shared -us Email Yes Bike lanes need to be included in all road improvement projects for safety and to encourage bicycle use for short 51 11/3/21 8:38:50 11/3/21 8:44:41 anonymous Donald Pouliot 8864 Spotted Towhee Di dapouliot@gmail.com No No Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, in the median Social Media Yes and longer trips instead of a car. I am a cyclist that rides through the greater Naples area. Having a safer, shared use bicycle pedestrian way on 52 11/3/218:39:20 11/3/218:46:10 anonymous Tom Rollins 16856 Brightling Way, N Trollins2455@gmail.con No Weekly Seasonal Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, in the median Email Yes Wilson Boulevard would be welcome. 53 11/3/219:04:12 11/3/219:07:53 anonymous Dorothy quiles 31018th st se. Naples, fl Mamadg13@yahoo.corr Yes No Daily Year-round Safety;5peeding Vehicle! Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Email Somewhat The more bike paths / bike lanes the better. As this area continues to grow so will the cycling community of all levels and abilities. The safer the surroundings can be made for those on two wheels would be greatly 54 11/3/219:23:30 11/3/219:31:32 anonymous Griffin Van Nest 5010 cedar springs #101 Griffinedward65@hotm; Yes No Other Year-round Safety;Speeding Vehicle! Lighting along entire roadway Yes, along the shared -us Social Media Yes appreciated I'm certain. Bike safety needs improvement as this road is a common route for many cyclists. Bike lanes and greater protection via widening lanes is really 55 11/3/219:54:32 11/3/219:59:21 anonymous Art DeMonte 7986 Valentina Ct Naple Apdemonte@Gmail.com No No Weekly Year-round Safety;Congestion;Speec Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Social Media Somewhat needed. Please include dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the 56 11/3/219:57:22 11/3/2110:03:58 anonymous Paul Malinowski 14513 Indigo Lakes Circle pilos5@gmail.com No No Other Seasonal Safety;Lack of Sidewalks, Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Both in the median and; Email Yes proposed roadway. On Saturdays our group of cyclists sometimes ride Wilson Boulevard. We would feel much safer with bike lanes. 57 11/3/2110:01:25 11/3/2110:11:18 anonymous RobertWilliams 9328 Surfbird Ct. Naples bob.carollbi@gmail.com No No Other Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Yes, in the median Email Yes Bob 58 11/3/2110:20:26 11/3/2110:25:11 anonymous Mitchell Bryars 1769 York Island Dr, Nap mbryars@gmail.com No No Weekly Seasonal Safety Speeding VehicleE Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Email Yes Need bike pathways 59 11/3/2110:35:38 11/3/2110:37:16 anonymous Peter G Brown 1763 Kitcheners Ct, Napl pgbrow@gmail.com No No Other Seasonal Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Email Yes Please add sidewalks and bike lanes! This is a great corridor for walking and biking, but needs to be much safer. There are lots of kids and cyclists in this area that deserve a safe space to walk and bike. 60 11/3/2111:03:48 11/3/2111:07:20 anonymous Megan Greer 9863 Kentucky St. Bonit[ greer.r.megan@gmail.cc No No Weekly Year-round Safety;Congestion;Speec Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Naples Pathways Coaliti, Somewhat Thank you! 61 11/3/2111:42:23 11/3/2111:44:38 anonymous Peter Osborne 406 Mango Avenue, POI prosborne@sbcglobal.ni No No Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Both in the median and; Naples Pathway Coalitio Yes I am a serious cyclist who uses Wilson Blvd. between Golden Gate Blvd and Immokalee Rd. regularly with Naples Velo Saturday rides from Naples to/from Ave Maria. It is very important for me (and my fellow cyclists) that this route include bicycle lanes. I am 72 years old and bike lanes provide a safe 62 11/3/2112:33:40 11/3/2112:41:56 anonymous Mark Simpson 26140 Hickory Blvd., Apt marksimpson72@gmail. No No Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Naples Pathway Coalitio No riding environment. Thank you. Bike and pedestrian facilities are badly needed in this major connecting corridor. I am glad to see a plan that 63 11/3/2112:49:13 11/3/2112:57:00 anonymous joe bonness 6830 sandalwood naple: uronjoe3@aol.com No No Other Year-round Safety;Lack of Sidewalks, Lighting along entire roadway No Social Media Yes encompasses all abilities. 64 11/3/2113:11:53 11/3/2113:13:32 anonymous No No Weekly Seasonal SafetVSpeeding Vehicles;Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes; No Social Media Yes I lead bicycle groups that use Wilson Road from Immokalee to Golden Gate on long rides from East Naples. This stretch is one of the most dangerous sections of roads we ride on. I have riders that refuse to go on rides that include that stretch, too many close calls, because there is no bike lane and very small shoulder. We must use the lane with automobiles and they try to squeeze us off the road and can be 65 11/3/2113:40:55 11/3/2113:47:39 anonymous Leigh r Masimore 7712 Winding Cypress D Irmasimore@gmail.com No No Other Year-round Safety;Speeding Vehicle! Lighting along entire roadway Bath in the median and; Email Yes quite aggressive and hostile. I am a bicyclist who rides this stretch of road about 3 times per week from January through March. A bike lane is the minimum necessary to bring safety 66 11/3/2115:45:50 11/3/2115:49:33 anonymous No No Weekly Seasonal Safety;Congestion;Speec Lighting along entire roadway Yes, in the median Email Yes to cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. 67 11/3/2115:58:34 11/3/2115:59:56 anonymous No No Daily Year-round Congestion;Speeding Ve Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Social Media No 68 11/3/21 16:10:41 11/3/21 16:14:57 69 11/3/2120:22:34 11/3/2120:24:24 70 11/3/2122:00:24 11/3/2122:05:00 I 71 11/4/21 10:16:09 11/4/21 10:26:22 72 11/5/21 7:56:40 11/5/21 8:03:23 73 11/5/21 11:43:14 11/5/21 11:45:59 Frank Tod ino 7565 Meadow Lakes DO ■ Dennis McGrath 8074 Chianti Lane Naple ■ Rand Franklin 6030 Cedar Tree Lane,N Dominick Marinos 108 Forest Hills Blvd Naf Isabel Melvin 411 Sixth St South No No No No No No No No No No Yes Y. 74 11/5/2121:33:07 11/5/2121:45:23 anonymous Jill Rosenfeld 223010th Ave NE jillfrosenfeld@gmail.con No No 75 at Public Meeting 10/27/21 on pape�r Lisa Rebele 535 22nd Ave NW, Naph rebele.lisa@comcast.net Yes Yes 76 at Public Meeting 10/27/21 on paper Liz Cole-Strachen 460 Wilson Blvd N, 3412 novletc@hotmad.com Yes Yes 77 at Public Meeting 10/27/21 on paper Robert Burkhard 875 Wilson Blvd N, Napl� bbburk@msn.com Yes Yes 78 at Public Meeting 10/27/21 on paper Yes Yes Paper Questions 1. Did this meeting provide you Paper Paper with sufficient Question Paper Question information on the 2. Was Question 4. Was proposed the 3. Was the improvements? If not, facility this format of what additional appropria meeting this information do you need to for this productiv meeting 6 know? meeting? e? effective? Weekly Year-round Safety;Speeding Vehicle! Lighting along entire roadway Yes, along the shared -us Email Somewhat Other Year-round Lack of5idewalks/Bike L Lighting along entire roadway No Email Yes Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Liahtina alone entire roadwav Both in the median and q Social Media Yes As a long time resident and avid bicyclist that rides on Golden Gate, Everglades and Wilson I see a huge Safety benefit to marked Bicycle Lane. Presently Wilson and other main roadways without designated bicycle lanes impose serious safety hazards to Other Year-round Safety;Speeding Vehicle! Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, in the median Email Somewhat pedestrians and bicyclist. The bike lane should be at least five feet wide with a tire vibrating strip Weekly Year-round Safety;Congestion;Speec Lighting only at intersections/cross streets No Somewhat barrier separating it from the car lane. https://mobile.twitter.com/Completed Weekly Seasonal Safety;Congestion;PoorLighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Email Somewhat Street/status/1456330772240023555 I was at the NIMs meeting and saw the plans/diagrams. My concerns are 1) the road widening is extreme, as it goes beyond the ROW by 30-35 feet on each side. Many homes are losing their driveways, etc. The roadway should be a smaller footprint and keep in align with the rural character of that area 2) the bicycle lane alongside the road is too dangerous, there should be landscape or, at a minimum, a gap of space between the road and bicycle lane, (utilizing native plants, trees and shrubs, would require minimal maintenance, once established). 3) I asked about city water and sewer lines and was advised there were no plans for same. I just want to make clear that we do not want water and sewer lines in the rural Estates. 4)1 believe utilizing native plants, shrubs and trees in the landscaped areas will be more cost Weekly Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, along the shared -us Email Somewhat effective in the long run. Thank you. Tunnels for wildlife; keep the light Daily Year-round Lack of Sidewalks/Bike L Lighting only at intersections/cross streets Yes, along the shared -us Roadway Message Sign minimal Yes Very informative meeting; Hoping to be Daily Year-round Speeding Vehicles;Lack c Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and; Roadway Message Sign kept in the loop as the project develops Yes I would like to see street lighting on the Daily Year-round Poor Visibility (Lighting); Lighting along entire roadway Both in the median and. Roadway Message Sign west side of this new roadway entirely Yes Daily Year-round No Problems Lighting only at intersections/cross streets -Onh, No; natural native planging Extend turn lanes @ GG Blvd Stacking From: MARIELA JUAN To: DeaneConnie Subject: 50 feet right of way easement Date: Saturday, October 30, 2021 3:46:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon, I prefer the existing 100 feet right of way easement typical section. My home was built according to the existing 50 feet right of way easement. My home would stay very near to the road if you took the proposed 165 feet right of way. My address is 1841 Wilson Blvd North, Naples, FI 34120 Thank you so much, Mariela From: Juan Doce To: DeaneConnie Subject: Widening Wilson Blvd street Date: Saturday, October 30, 2021 5:59:15 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I prefer the future proposed 165" of the right way. 1841 Wilson Blvd North, Naples FL, 34120. Thanks. Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor Congestion Study (from Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Rd) General Public Comments and Responses Email - District 9/28/2021 9/28/2021 Lorraine Lantz Adriana 140 Jung Blvd. E Email Y 5 Flores Collier County, FL 34120 Commissioner adriana62191@yahoo.com Inquiry My name is Adriana Flores. I live on 140 Jung Blvd E Naples FI 34120. 1 wanted to email you and ask if there is a plan for getting a side walk on Wilson Blvd. I see that there are a lot of people commuting by foot that would really benefit having one. I would also like there to be a sidewalk so my kids could ride their bikes safely on. If there is not a plan for one to get made how can I get one going? Email 9/28/2021 9/28/2021 Lorraine Lantz Thanks for your time Tom Brock brockti1753@amail.com Email Y Good Afternoon, Would you be able to tell me the status of the Wilson Blvd. Extension project, when right of way acquisition and construction will each start, and when the next public meeting will be held? Thank you, Tom Brock Email 1/8/2021 10/8/2021 Lorraine Lantz Bruce Kotila Email Email 1: Email 2: Lorraine Lantz 10/10/2021 10/13/2021 Email 3:10/29/21 Melissa Antonio melissaptoscano@¢mail.com Toscano Martizez antonioiosemtzC@¢mail.com Email 10/29/2021 10/29/2021 Lorraine Lantz Juan Dace Caballero mariela082@hotmaii.com Email N For all of us cycling enthusiasts, please ensure that bicycles can safely get through that intersection in all directions. Thanks, Bruce Kotila kotila@newnorth.net Email Y Hello Lorraine, I hope all is well, We bought a lot: 1899 Wilson Blvd N, Naples, FI 34120. We are planning to build a house next year. We received the letter of the Wilson Blvd Widening corridor, and we will assist at the meeting October 27th, 2021. However, Can you please send me the urbanization plans of the corridor. How wide will it be? I would like to know how it will impact my property, and if the utilities, and drainage, means I won't need to have the septic and water well. There will be an assessment cost or any increase of taxes we will have to pay for? Also please let me know if it will be any eminent domain? When they are planning to start building the corridor. We are in favor and excited about the corridor, we just had the questions above now that we will build or primary house in that street. Please find attached my DEP Site Plan that will get approved this month, Thank you, Melissa Toscano. <site plan attached> Email Y Good Morning, Ever since I bought my property, it is subject to 50 feet for the roadway easement. Will I receive any compensation from Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor for the 50 feet or did the prior owner receive that? I live on 1841 Wilson Blvd North Naples, FL 34120. Thank you so much Ms. Flores, Thank you for your comments. Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a 2-lane (existing) to a 4-lane roadway with curb and gutter, between Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. The Study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. The proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility. We are planning to host a Public Information Meeting for the Study on Wednesday, October 27, 2021, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the OF/IFAS Extension at 14700 Immokalee Road, in Naples, FL, 34120. We will add your contact information and comments to our project public involvement and distribution list. We will also include you on future distributions of information about the public meeting and the Study. If you have any additional questions, you may contact me at Lorraine.lantz@colliercountyfl.gov or (239) 252-5779. Mr. Brock, Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a 2-lane (existing) to a 4-lane roadway with curb and gutter, between Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. We are planning to host a Public Information Meeting for the Study on Wednesday, October 27, 2021, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the OF/IFAS Extension at 14700 Immokalee Road, in Naples, FL, 34120. We will add your contact information to our project public involvement and distribution list. We will also include you on future distributions of information about the Mr. Kotila, Yes, the safety of all users was considered through -out the corridor study and in all the conceptual recommendations. As always, thank you for your comments they will be added to the public record. Respectfully, Lorraine Email 2: Ms. Toscana, We are currently conducting a study of the Wilson Blvd. corridor for the widening project. The intent of this Study is to evaluate the potential improvements along Wilson Blvd. to determine the widening alignment. The results of this Study will be a conceptual plan for the corridor. Our public meeting on Oct. 27th will introduce the project and a preliminary concept for the corridor. I am glad to hear that you will attend that meeting, as we can discuss the project, how it will proceed and your property in more detail at that time. Generally, we anticipate the final Study with a corridor conceptual alignment will not be completed until January 2022. The ultimate design plans and right-of-way (ROW) acquisition needs are determined during the Design Phase. According to the Collier County 5 year Work Program, Design and ROW are planned for FY22 and FY23 and Construction is planned for FY24. This is part of the County's budget and not an additional assessment. The drainage system and utility relocations are related to the roadway drainage and existing public utility well sites. This project will not change your need to have well and septic systems. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. I look forward to speaking with you at the public meeting on Oct. 27th. Email 3: Mr. Caballero, Thank you for contacting me. The displays and information provided at the public meeting are available on our website https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-sz/ transportation-planning/planning-studies in the accordion titled — Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. The display titled "Existing and Proposed Typical Section" shows the existing rightof- way easement likely obtained from a prior owner or when the area was platted. This project is currently in the corridor study planning phase which will conclude when the Study is presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval, tentatively scheduled for January 2022. The phases that follow are the project design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded starting in Fiscal Year 2021. Funding for the construction phase is expected to be available beginning in 2024. Typically, when the project is at 60% design phase, the right-of-way acquisition begins. The Collier County Right of Way Acquisition Section of the County Growth Management Department will contact impacted property owners and provide a written offer to purchase the required right-of-way for the project. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. 1of2 12/17/2021 Date Response Response Comment S ommeont Comment Agency fequested., Namel N Fa- e 2 Address/Contact Info TType in ormat)ion . Content, if applicable (excerpts) _r R Response (excerpts) Date Sent By 6 Email 10/27/2021 10/28/2021 Lorraine Lantz Labby Tom F tomfioseph@¢mail.com Email Y Hello Mr. Joseph, George Joseph We are unable to attend today's meeting . Thank you for contacting me. The displays and information provided at the public meeting are available on our website Had a few questions https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies in the accordion 1. There is hardly that much vehicle traffic on Wilson Blvd So is this expansion really required ? titled — Current— Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. can this whole expansion be cancelled ? The widening of Wilson Boulevard is needed to improve safety, traffic flow, and to better connect the overall traffic network in 2. Since we will be losing some front yard for this project we will get the compensation for the land right ? the Golden Gate Estates area. While the future widening project will try to avoid or minimize the impacts to the community, 3. The value of our house also will fall when the big 4 lane highway is in front of our house there will be a right-of-way acquisition phase necessary for the project. This project is currently in the corridor study planning will any payment be made for this loss in value of our house . phase which will conclude when the Study is presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval, tentatively Please inform us . scheduled for January 2022. The phases that follow are the project design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. The Thank You adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded starting in Fiscal Labby George & Tom F Joseph Year 2021. Funding for the construction phase is expected to be available beginning in 2024. Typically, when the project is at 2040 Wilson Blvd N 60% design phase, the right-of-way acquisition begins. The Collier County Right of Way Acquisition Section of the County Naples, FL 34120 Growth Management Department will contact impacted property owners and provide a written offer to purchase the required 7 Email 10/30/2021 11/8/2021 Connie Deane Juan Doce ivandoce1212@hotmail.com Email N I preferthe future proposed 165" of the right way. Hi Juan Doce: Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments for the Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. Your comments will be 1841 Wilson Blvd North, Naples FL, 34120. added to our data gathered for this study. This study is anticipated to be complete in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners either in late 2021 or in early 2022 for approval. Thanks. We appreciate your participation in this important project. 8 Email 10/30/2021 11/8/2021 Connie Deane Mariela Juan Email N Good Afternoon, Hi Mariela: I prefer the existing 100 feet right of way easement typical section. My home was built according to the existing 50 feet Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments for the Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. Your comments will be right of way easement. My home would stay very near to the road if you took the proposed 165 feet right of way. added to our data gathered for this study. This study is anticipated to be complete in December 2021 and be presented before My address is 1841 Wilson Blvd North, Naples, FI 34120 the Board of County Commissioners in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. Thank you so much, We appreciate your participation in this important project. mariela082@hotmail.com> Mariela 9 Email 11/18/2021 11/18/2021 Lorraine Lantz Eric Morales Maripia eric@solixmedia.com Email Y Hello Lorraine, Ms. Morales, Morales 954-562-7369 We just purchased the property at 1959 Wilson Blvd and we just learned that there are plans for the expansion of this main Thank you for reaching out to me. We will add you to our project distribution list. This project proposes to widen Wilson road. If possible, would you mind adding my contact info to any list regarding this project? We'd like to stay informed and Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles), from a 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4- up-to-date. lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. The Study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, Thank you, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural Eric & Mariapia Morales environment. Proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved 954-562-7369 multimocial mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements. Information on this Study can be found at the following link: https://www.colliercou ntyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-project-pla n n ing-i mpact-fees-and- 10 Email 12/6/2021 12/6/2021 Lorraine Lantz Elaine Whitley e.whitlev058@¢mail.com Email Y Good Morning, Ms. Whitley, I'm emailing to see if you can tell me what is currently underway for the Wilson Blvd. Extension project in Collier County, Thank you for your question regarding the Wilson Blvd. Corridor Study from immokalee Rd. to Golden Gate Blvd. The tentative and when right of way acquisitions and construction might begin? schedule is to present the Corridor Study to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for approval in January 2022. Once Sincerely, approved, the Corridor Study planning phase of the project is complete. The phases that follow are the project design, right -of - Elaine Whitley way acquisition (ROW), and construction. The adopted Collier County 2022 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded for design and ROW in Fiscal Years 2022 and 2023 followed by construction in Fiscal Year2024. Additional information regarding the Corridor Study is available on the Collier County website at: 2of2 12/17/2021 From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia; Ross, Colleen/ORL Subject: [EXTERNAL] Wilson Blvd. -Adriana Flores Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 12:15:10 PM Felicia, Please add this comment and answer to the Wilson Blvd. Public Comment and distribution list. Thanks! Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C le County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:54 AM To: ScavoneMichelle <Michelle.Scavone@colliercountyfl.gov>; McLean Matthew <Matthew.McLean @colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: AIMS 311 Service Request #72764 (TP 8720)- (District 5 Commissioner Inquiry)-Adriana Flores DRAFT Ms. Flores, Thank you for your comments. Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a 2-lane (existing) to a 4-lane roadway with curb and gutter, between Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. The Study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. The proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility. We are planning to host a Public Information Meeting for the Study on Wednesday, October 27, 2021, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the OF/IFAS Extension at 14700 Immokalee Road, in Naples, FL, 34120. We will add your contact information and comments to our project public involvement and distribution list. We will also include you on future distributions of information about the public meeting and the Study. If you have any additional questions, you may contact me at Lorraine. lantz&colliercountyfl.gov or (239) 252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner 7 C�44-ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: ScavoneMichelle <Michelle.ScavonePcolliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 9:56 AM To: McLeanMatthew <Matthew.McLean (@colliercountyfLgov>; LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: AIMS 311 Service Request #72764 (TP 8720)- (District 5 Commissioner Inquiry) -Adriana Flores Importance: High Please handle this as an AIMS issue- this 311 request is coming from Commissioners office Please see the issue below and forward to the appropriate staff to address. See below DUE DATE by 3pm on 10/5/2021 Please provide me a response by due date or sooner if possible, so I may forward into the 311 system and request closure. Thanks, Michelle Collier County, FL A new service request has been filed. ID 72764 Date/Time 9/28/2021 7:55 AM Type District 5 Commissioner Inquiry Address 140 Jung Blvd E, Naples Origin Call Center Comments My name is Adriana Flores. I live on 140 Jung Blvd E Naples FI 34120. 1 wanted to email you and ask if there is a plan for getting a side walk on Wilson Blvd. I see that there are a lot of people commuting by foot that would really benefit having one. I would also like there to be a sidewalk so my kids could ride their bikes safely on. If there is not a plan for one to get made how can I get one going? Thanks for your time Adriana Flores Sent from my iPhone Submitter Flores, Adriana 140 Jung Blvd. E Collier County, FL 34120 adriana62191 &yahoo.com Collier County, FL Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Wilson Blvd. Extension Project Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 2:59:18 PM Another one for the Wilson PIP. Thanks! Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner COfWCty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 2:59 PM To: 'Thomas Brock' <brocktj1753@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Wilson Blvd. Extension Project Mr. Brock, Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a 2-lane (existing) to a 4- lane roadway with curb and gutter, between Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. We are planning to host a Public Information Meeting for the Study on Wednesday, October 27, 2021, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the OF/IFAS Extension at 14700 Immokalee Road, in Naples, FL, 34120. We will add your contact information to our project public involvement and distribution list. We will also include you on future distributions of information about the public meeting and the Study. If you have any additional questions, you may contact me at Lorraine.lantz&colliercountyfl.gov or (239) 252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner COfICT C.Y Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: Thomas Brock <brockt017531@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 2:25 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Wilson Blvd. Extension Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon, Would you be able to tell me the status of the Wilson Blvd. Extension project, when right of way acquisition and construction will each start, and when the next public meeting will be held? Thank you, Tom Brock Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Bruce Kotila Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Date: Friday, October 8, 2021 3:58:12 PM Mr. Kotila, Yes, the safety of all users was considered through -out the corridor study and in all the conceptual recommendations. As always, thank you for your comments they will be added to the public record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner COtWC ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: Bruce Kotila <kotila@newnorth.net> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 1:33 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. For all of us cycling enthusiasts, please ensure that bicycles can safely get through that intersection in all directions. Thanks, Bruce Kotila kotilaPnewnorth.net Sent from my iPhone On Oct 8, 2021, at 11:50, LantzLorraine <Lorraine. La ntzPcolliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your continued interest in the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is expected to hear this item at their regularly scheduled BCC meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 2021. All BCC Meetings begin at 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112. During that meeting, the BCC will review the study documentation and make recommendations for the next phases of the project. The staff recommendations are for the BCC to direct the County Manager or designee to accept the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestions Study and: 1. Pursue an overpass at Immokalee Road and Livingston Road; 2. Pursue a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) at the Immokalee Road/1- 75 Interchange with coordination with FDOT; 3. Pursue a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) at Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard; 4. Pursue other recommended activities necessary to manage congestion and improve the operational efficiency, safety and functionality of this corridor and the transportation network in the county; 5. Continue with public engagement with impacted stakeholders through the design and construction process; and 6. Direct staff to implement the adaptive traffic signal control and develop a phasing plan for the addition of combined through/right turn lanes, and incorporate into the upcoming capital improvement element. The BCC Agenda and full Agenda Packet for the 10/12/21 meeting is posted on the County's website at the following link: http://colliercountyfl.igm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx This item has been assigned to Agenda Item 11 C. You may view the Executive Summary and the Technical Report and attachments at the following link: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s- z/transportation-planning_/planning-studies Please note the website is set-up in an accordion style and if you click on the title Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study heading, the project information will be displayed. Please contact me at Lorraine. Lantz&CollierCountyFL.gov if you have any additional questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner <image002 Jpg> Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine, Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Melissa Toscano; Antonio Martinez Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor. Date: Friday, October 29, 2021 9:41:52 AM Attachments: imaae001.ono Ms. Toscano, The displays and information provided at the public meeting are now available on our website https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies in the accordion titled — Current— Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. I have included snip of the "Existing and Proposed Typical Section" display below as it may be helpful to you as you plan to design and build your home. yyyy��I ari� WIdWrpry corridor Study Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner ER��IV ,o, •ao.•T OF vm. E4"WW I I nr a eo-+ n �• a •• a ■ rr r rr e.p........�...... �` .w.�.w---a..y,..t.. � r•��+a•.wrr..,rw,. `r ...r..�.,y wow rri�oi®�t++• tisi.-iPei.. 1A°�'�O!■.�4!L�+�^• �� �s■rr�a�. -1"1 OF W"uWWM1RN MDh*AjEGT T44C� C"IKiOE$A- CoiLie-r County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.aov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 20214:40 PM To: 'Melissa Toscano' <melissaptoscano@gmail.com>; Antonio Martinez <antoniojosemtz@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor. Ms. Toscano, We are currently conducting a study of the Wilson Blvd. corridor for the widening project. The intent of this Study is to evaluate the potential improvements along Wilson Blvd. to determine the widening alignment. The results of this Study will be a conceptual plan for the corridor. Our public meeting on Oct. 27th will introduce the project and a preliminary concept for the corridor. I am glad to hear that you will attend that meeting, as we can discuss the project, how it will proceed and your property in more detail at that time. Generally, we anticipate the final Study with a corridor conceptual alignment will not be completed until January 2022. The ultimate design plans and right-of-way (ROW) acquisition needs are determined during the Design Phase. According to the Collier County S year Work Program, Design and ROW are planned for FY22 and FY23 and Construction is planned for FY24. This is part of the County's budget and not an additional assessment. The drainage system and utility relocations are related to the roadway drainage and existing public utility well sites. This project will not change your need to have well and septic systems. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. I look forward to speaking with you at the public meeting on Oct. 27th Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o tCT COUnt Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.aov From: Melissa Toscano <melissaptoscano(@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2021 12:04 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine. La ntz(@colliercountyfl.gov>; Antonio Martinez <antoniojosemtz(@gmail.com> Subject: Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Lorraine, I hope all is well, We bought a lot: 1899 Wilson Blvd N, Naples, FI 34120. We are planning to build a house next year. We received the letter of the Wilson Blvd Widening corridor, and we will assist at the meeting October 27th, 2021. However, Can you please send me the urbanization plans of the corridor. How wide will it be? I would like to know how it will impact my property, and if the utilities, and drainage, means I won't need to have the septic and water well. There will be an assessment cost or any increase of taxes we will have to pay for? Also please let me know if it will be any eminent domain? When they are planning to start building the corridor. We are in favor and excited about the corridor, we just had the questions above now that we will build or primary house in that street. Please find attached my DEP Site Plan that will get approved this month, Thank you, Melissa Toscano. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Project Map Type - Date — — Antonio Martinez - 37598400004 - Wilson Blvd N jis ` Collier County, Florida Site Plan 06/25/21 EARTH H ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC 10600 JOLEA AVENUE BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 'HONE (239) 304-0030 FAX (239) 324-0054 WWW.ETEFLORIDA.COM From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia; Ross, Colleen/ORL Cc: SangerCorene Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor Date: Friday, October 29, 2021 9:09:05 AM For the Wilson Public Involvement Report. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C 7 C y Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 9:08 AM To: 'MARI ELA J UAN'<mariela082@ <mariela082@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor Mr. Caballero, Thank you for contacting me. The displays and information provided at the public meeting are available on our website https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s- z/transportation-planning/planning-studies in the accordion titled — Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. The display titled "Existing and Proposed Typical Section" shows the existing right- of-way easement likely obtained from a prior owner or when the area was platted. This project is currently in the corridor study planning phase which will conclude when the Study is presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval, tentatively scheduled for January 2022. The phases that follow are the project design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded starting in Fiscal Year 2021. Funding for the construction phase is expected to be available beginning in 2024. Typically, when the project is at 60% design phase, the right-of-way acquisition begins. The Collier County Right of Way Acquisition Section of the County Growth Management Department will contact impacted property owners and provide a written offer to purchase the required right-of-way for the project. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C I C014ktty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: MARIELAJUAN <mariela082(@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 29, 20218:23 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Morning, Ever since I bought my property, it is subject to 50 feet for the roadway easement. Will I receive any compensation from Wilson Blvd Widening Corridor for the 50 feet or did the prior owner receive that? I live on 1841 Wilson Blvd North Naples, FL 34120. Thank you so much, Juan Doce Caballero Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia; Ross, Colleen/ORL Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Wilson Blvd Expansion Project Date: Thursday, October 28, 2021 5:22:40 PM FYI —for the Public Involvement Report. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner COfICT Cty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 5:22 PM To: 'Tom Joseph' <tomfjoseph@gmaiLcom> Subject: RE: Wilson Blvd Expansion Project Mr. Joseph, Thank you for contacting me. The displays and information provided at the public meeting are available on our website httl2s://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s- z/transportation-planning/planning-studies in the accordion titled — Current — Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. The widening of Wilson Boulevard is needed to improve safety, traffic flow, and to better connect the overall traffic network in the Golden Gate Estates area. While the future widening project will try to avoid or minimize the impacts to the community, there will be a right-of-way acquisition phase necessary for the project. This project is currently in the corridor study planning phase which will conclude when the Study is presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval, tentatively scheduled for January 2022. The phases that follow are the project design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded starting in Fiscal Year 2021. Funding for the construction phase is expected to be available beginning in 2024. Typically, when the project is at 60% design phase, the right-of-way acquisition begins. The Collier County Right of Way Acquisition Section of the County Growth Management Department will contact impacted property owners and provide a written offer to purchase the required right-of-way. The offer is based on a state certified real estate appraisers estimate of the full compensation of the right-of-way. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Co Ter County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Tom Joseph <tomfiosephPgmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 20216:22 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantzi@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Wilson Blvd Expansion Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello We are unable to attend today's meeting . Had a few questions 1. There is hardly that much vehicle traffic on Wilson Blvd So is this expansion really required ? can this whole expansion be cancelled ? 2. Since we will be losing some front yard for this project we will get the compensation for the land right ? 3. The value of our house also will fall when the big 4 lane highway is in front of our house will any payment be made for this loss in value of our house . Please inform us . Thank You Labby George & Tom F Joseph 2040 Wilson Blvd N Naples , FL 34120 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: DeaneConnie To: Juan Doce Subject: RE: Widening Wilson Blvd street Hi Juan Doce: Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments for the Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. Your comments will be added to our data gathered for this study. This study is anticipated to be complete in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners either in late 2021 or in early 2022 for approval. We appreciate your participation in this important project. Kind regards, Connie Deane Community Liaison Community and Media Relations Section Collier County Growth Management Department 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Connie.Deane�,colliercountX,fl. 239.252.8365 (desk) From: Juan Doce <juandoce1212@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2021 5:59 PM To: DeaneConnie <Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Widening Wilson Blvd street EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I prefer the future proposed 165" of the right way. 1841 Wilson Blvd North, Naples FL, 34120. Thanks. From: DeaneConnie To: MARIELA JUAN Subject: RE: 50 feet right of way easement Hi Mariela: Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments for the Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study. Your comments will be added to our data gathered for this study. This study is anticipated to be complete in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners in late 2021 or early 2022 for approval. We appreciate your participation in this important project. Kind regards, Connie Deane Community Liaison Community and Media Relations Section Collier County Growth Management Department 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Connie.Deane�.colliercountX,fl. 239.252.8365 (desk) From: MARIELA JUAN <mariela082@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2021 3:47 PM To: DeaneConnie <Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: 50 feet right of way easement EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon, I prefer the existing 100 feet right of way easement typical section. My home was built according to the existing 50 feet right of way easement. My home would stay very near to the road if you took the proposed 165 feet right of way. My address is 1841 Wilson Blvd North, Naples, FI 34120 Thank you so much, Mariela From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia; SanaerCorene Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: New owner at 1959 Wilson Blvd Date: Thursday, November 18, 2021 8:23:14 AM Please update the distribution and inquiry lists to add Ms. Morales at the address above. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner COtWr Cy Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 8:22 AM To: 'Eric Morales' <eric@solixmedia.com> Subject: RE: New owner at 1959 Wilson Blvd Ms. Morales, Thank you for reaching out to me. We will add you to our project distribution list. This project proposes to widen Wilson Boulevard, from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles), from a 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4- lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. The Study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also include the addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements. Information on this Study can be found at the following link: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital-proiect- planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/planning-studies under the "Current —Wilson Blvd. Widening Corridor Study' tab. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C l 4Z�t;y Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: Eric Morales <outlook 6C537DBFDFCFA5B5C@outlook.com> On Behalf Of Eric Morales Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 12:10 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: New owner at 1959 Wilson Blvd EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Lorraine, We just purchased the property at 1959 Wilson Blvd and we just learned that there are plans for the expansion of this main road. If possible, would you mind adding my contact info to any list regarding this project? We'd like to stay informed and up-to-date. Thank you, Eric & Mariapia Morales 954-562-7369 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia; SanaerCorene Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Project Question Date: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:59:18 PM FYI — more public involvement regarding Wilson. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner COfICT C.y Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:53 PM To:'Elaine Whitley' <e.whitley058@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Project Question Ms. Whitley, Thank you for your question regarding the Wilson Blvd. Corridor Study from Immokalee Rd. to Golden Gate Blvd. The tentative schedule is to present the Corridor Study to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for approval in January 2022. Once approved, the Corridor Study planning phase of the project is complete. The phases that follow are the project design, right- of-way acquisition (ROW), and construction. The adopted Collier County 2022 Five-year Work Program shows the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded for design and ROW in Fiscal Years 2022 and 2023 followed by construction in Fiscal Year 2024. Additional information regarding the Corridor Study is available on the Collier County website at: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisions/capital- project-planning-impact-fees-and-program-management/transportation-planning= section/planning-studies Under Current — Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study tab Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner 4 C � 4Z�y Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Elaine Whitley <e.whitley058(@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 11:39 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Project Question EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Morning, I'm emailing to see if you can tell me what is currently underway for the Wilson Blvd. Extension project in Collier County, and when right of way acquisitions and construction might begin? Sincerely, Elaine Whitley ®❑ Virus -free. www.avast.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Appendix 1.5 Meeting Displays •TN!\ 1 [�l ►� �►�il� N W- E 5 Not to scale Boi Spi No Na Nal Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study -C� County Growth Management Department MONROE COUNTY Widening 0 TwinEagles Golf Club Immokale 7 CO n N ch z C olde Florida Golf Club z z z z Z U} CO U) U) -C � (ALO N N r Golden Gate BLVD W z z U� U) 00 U) 4- CO E I. U) s Cfl i U) N - — 25th AVE NW 24th AVE NW II U) F, 22nd AVE NW 20th AVE NW Y ��alencia Golf ountry Club Randall BLVD 24th AVE NE 22nd AVE NE 20th AVE NE 18th AVE NW 18th AVE NE Jung BLVD W _ _ _ - M Jung BLVD E 16th AVE NW 16th AVE NE -- II AVE NW H14th m '.� . i + E 14th AVE NE � 1 12th AVE NW I- ,,,, 12thAVE NE I� `0J ti 10th AVE NW 10th AVE NE I LU w w w w= w wLU z z z z z z z z= z z z CO = 00 C) N LO C'd CD 00 N 7 N (V Legend N County Road Golf Course Local Road Study Limits Canal Q Study Area Water Body Parcel 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles .;acobs k1*11:1" ELI 122036WALIIDZD Congestion Increase Roadway Capacity Addition of Medians & Turning Lanes obillity Continuous Sidewalk, Shared -Us e Path & Bike Lanes Enhance North -South Access Improve Transit Reliability & Access Safety Imprc Inters ecuons Additional Lighting Reduce Conflicts Vehicles, Bicyclists & Pedestrians Evacuation Reduce Congestion Improve Evacuation Times for Eastern Collier County Improve Access for Emergency Responders Environmental Balance Community & Environment Improve Stormwater Management & Water Quality Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study Widening F- 0 a w U) O a O 0� EXISTING H z w 5 w U) Q w O z P U) R W RIGHT ................................................................................................................ PROPOSED 165' RIGHT OF WAY ....................................................................................................................... I LL O F- C� co)*Icr County Growth Management Department *RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS/DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT TO CHANGE DURING DESIGN : ,acobs NSET SET NSE Roadway typical sections between 160 teet to 2 4 tvn'ical section of 165 feet is recommended te proposed p parcel Roti xisting xisting County Pro :)ronerty Plat Line -xisting Casemei :)ronosed Riaht a :,Til iTi WE 011 MTATKZ IIliixw& :ar:a"Teo IIIfeIK:41 :ai�u�r.�N�.y��uui�:.�K���n��ri���•�aaiu���:�.yui��Nn�arr. wt4 . 4 ,.i. _ - +fir [ _f _ a • +ti"fly' ". IN41� err 7� Y . r '* - i r �. F ^ .3.: tiG"' F4• rf .5 _ T l 7 1 IAM Y� +'* 1 / :+ �i *. -1 , #, 1 ' Z%4r +y '. � i.y �* #' 7` �' � + l'�� �' •� i.`y� � C s F # 4 • .� S- mot':�g 1� f NL k •t # �e .�} f'C AV * i r" Pro osed p Ri ni of Wa ; g y t r 01 IL Al } - f Ir yy -1 Y • {t 1 F 5+ T I-. +vim - � .� k � {-` � _ k U. ��J1'• ic� f I posed Ri o a •tt t.�, 5, >� Imo` l i* x ��-- -• �-- -- r i gr y � � � +R '—'-i• - yr, � � mime f 7 - M, fie{ ' %�! l,�•` i ' f ALI� 41 Uj -dIL CIA. 00 IP y'' � k ♦ :t � � may" � •t rr { � 'f� yy �r: i � # r�'' { ;� r. We r t _ ,r 7 Y C I f 1 R r I � � I fi r +�_ T f SFr 0a ' f r T ! r r Exists n Easement � � . '� - �•� � # ��..4 I r F r+ hp Existing aseme t ` i }' "° > ' -- ........ -- -- --� ,---------- - -- --� W Alk - -- - - y L 1 �s Zt` *•+,'sic , i 4 w fi rt FP IL ]r!�■Ii111relei L"Sis] ■sIllitoN OIr:,L"■iro)011leiIIto[Us Public Information Meeting (5 p.m. - 7 p.m.) Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2021 ■ University of Florida/IFAS Extension Office Multipurpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road ■ Naples, FL 34120 D :A kDA 2LYA 2 Ll I E I ME I 2kl:j kDA:VA OR*] ZO(OITA 10 • Co per County Growth Management Department 10 Recommended Maintain social Follow pubiic to wear a face distancing (6ft) mask at all times health guidelines for hygiene Wi40 lson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Jacobs Exhibil Cost Feasible Plan Projects (2026-2045) 2045 LRTP Update a 846 I I I ORE 0' Ww-_ 9% r . I P �, t[ f J { dr M ���f: '■� - � `sir � mNIP-� 4'I EE 75 i , I . I" —Ail— OEM _ l F14 I �+]1%6 1 — ria �� • ��� 64 M VA ✓ -4 =' Qk In �F Marco LA R 858 75 saes u� 53 M. M 0 • 75 I FU1M11 K 5 1 _ n 4LEE INSET E-2 so r"J L LT2, �, Asa IMwP PLO �+ moo r*J*JaVP *M�, P1F*ILL" w��' j rt rtti rt� L. 10 y**f�M* . 0000 Z. p r` A RS Yr 7 f ru'! rd '{-,m J ■ 0101ON0 Committed Projects (2019-2025) 75 ■ 29 75 9d Appendix 1.6 Project Newsletter #2 00' woilsoBoulevard Cdrridor Study Widening Collier County is conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study to evaluate alternatives for widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane (existing) to a four -lane roadway with curb and gutter, from just south of Golden Gate Boulevard to just north of Immokalee Road (approximately 3.7 miles). The study involves the evaluation of alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also includethe addition of sidewalks, a shared -use path, and bake lanes for improved multimodal mobility, as well as bus stop enhancements (addition of bus stop pads, etc.). Additional project elements include intersection access changes, drainage systems upgrades, existing bridge replacement, utility relocations, and right-of-way acquisition. El condado de Godlier esta Ilevando a cabo el Estudio del corredor de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard Para evaivar las alternativas pars ampliar Wilson Boulevard de una carretera de Z carriles (existente) a una de 4 carriies con acera y cuneta, de of sur de Golden Gate Boulevard al none de Immokalee Road (aproximadamente 3.7 millas). El estudio incluye fa evaivacion de alineaciones afternativas pars mejorar la movilidad. mejorar la seguridad y acomodar los volumenes de tra"fico futuros, mientras se evita o minimiza los impactos a la comunidad y al medio ambience. Las mejoras propuestas tambie"n incluyen la adicion de aceras, un Camino de use compartido y carriles Para bicicletas para mejorar Ila movilidad multimodal, asi Como mejoras en las pandas de autob6s (adici6n de almohadillas de la panda de autobus, etc.). Los elementos adicionafes del proyecto incluyen cambios en el acceso en las intersecciones, mejoras al sistema de drenaJe, reemplazo del Puente existence, Teubicacion de servicios pAlicos y adquisicion de derecho de Paso. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED,,.-,--------_ ___�_ .__ PROP�SITO-Y NECESIDAD DEL PRC YE.CTOw, The widening of Wilson Boulevard is needed to improve safety, traffic flow, and to better connect the overall traffic network in the Golden Gate Estates area as follows: Immokalee Road which can no longer be widened, experiences significant congestion; Golden Gate Boulevard is policy constrained to four lanes and experiences congestion Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) Extension which will cross Wilson Boulevard between 10th Avenue NW and 12th Avenue NW, will help relieve congestion along Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard Travelers will use Wilson Boulevard to access VBR Extension, and therefore more traffic is anticipated on Wilson Boulevard • Wilson Boulevard will also act as a parallel traffic reliever to Collier Boulevard to the west 4 Wilson Boulevard will be the first 4-lane roadway east of Collier Boulevard; there are no other 4-lane north -south roadways east of Collier Boulevard today Twin £agi -� t C1��# IL 25TFI _SE) AVE KW 'IS TH AVE NW 14TH-AYL NVV 43bftfWAN - cif CkAb I-OV4 AVE N GOLDEN GATE BL S La ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard es necesaria Para mejorar !a seguridad. el flujv de tra�co y Para cflnectar me�or la red de t�afcv general en el area de Golden Gate Estates de la siguiente manera: 4 Immokalee Road, que ya no se puede ensanchar, experiments una congestion significativa; Golden Gate Boulevard esta restringida Por politico a cuatro carriles y experiments congestion 1 La extension de Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR), que cruzara Wilson Boulevard entre 10th Avenue NW y 12th Avenue NW. ayudara a aliviar la congestion a Io largo de 1-mmokalee Road y Golden Gate Boulevard • Los viajeros utilizaran Wilson Boulevard Para acceder a la extension VBR, por Io tanto, se preve" mas trAfico en Wilson Boulevard e Road y Golden Gate Boulevard # ANE ALL BLV Wilson Boulevard tambile"n actuary �- Como un relevo de tra"fico paralelo a Collier Boulevard hacia el oeste 0 — -1 t 4THAVLNL Wilson Boulevard > I I W Z — _ sera la primers via de 4 carhles al este de T VL- W Collier Boulevard, hoy no hay otras IOTH AVE NE arr tar s de 4 rril s n rt su r - l este de Collier Boy ar r u Protect Area Canals Water Bodies Major streets Golf Cou r e 1 3k s C Of 7 r County Project Manager, Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 PROJECT SCHEDULE This study is anticipated to be complete in December 2021 and be presented before the Board of County Commissioners in early 2022 for approval. The adopted Collier County 2021 Five-year Work Program includes the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project as funded for design and right- of-way acquisition phases scheduled to begin during Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, and the construction phase in FY 202411 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT One of the most important aspects of a study is public involvement. it is very important for you to be able to provide your comments related to the proposed improvements. We use a variety of methods for you to stay involved in the process such as public meetings, small group meetings, and a project website. In addition, Collier County mails notifications to all property owners within the study area as well as to agencies and local officials prior to the public meeting. PROJECT CONTACT We encourage you to participate Boulevard Widening Corridor Study questions and comments. If you regarding the project, please contact: in the Wilson and invite your have questions Wilson Boulevard widening Corridor Study Lorraine Lantz, Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite # 103 Naples, FL 34104 Access the project website through the following QR Code and go to the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study tab or visit the website link: % . 10 CALENDARIO DEL PROYECTO Se preve" que este Estudio se completara en diciembre de 2021 y se presentara" ante fa Junta de Comisionados del Condado a principios del 2022 pars su aprobacio'n. El proyecto esta financiado acivaimente en el Plan de Mej*oramiento del Transporte de la Organizacio'n de Planificacio'n Metropolitana de Collier con las fases de disen'o y adquisicion de derechos de paso que comenzaran durante el ono fiscal 2021, y la fase de construccion en el ono fiscal 2024. PARTICIPACION PUBLICA Uno de los aspectos mas importantes del estudio es la participacion p0blica. Es muy important que ustedes puedan aportar sus comentarios sobre las mejoras propuestas. Se usaran una variedad de metodos pars que ustedes sigan participando en el proyecto, tal Como reuniones p6blicas, reuniones en grupos pequehos y en un sitio web del proyecto. Adicionalmente, el Condado de Collier enviara por correo notificaciones a todos los duen"os de propiedades dentro del area de estudio y a las agendas Y funcionarios locales antes de las reuniones publicas. CONT CT DEL PROYECTO Los invitamos a participar corrector de ampliaci6n de en el Estudio Wilson Boulevard hacernos Ilegar sus preguntas y comentarios. Si alguna pregunta relacionada core el proyecto, por p6ngase en contacto con: VE Q SCAN ME Phone (239) 252-5779 Lorrainelantz 4 del y a tienen favor Acceda al sitio web del proyecto a troves del siguiente codigo QR y vaya a !a pestan'a Estudio del corrector de ampliacion de Wilson Boulevard o visite el enlace del sitio web: www.calliercount fl. ovl overnmentl rowth-mans ementldivisions/ca ital- roect- im act-fees-and-program-management/transportation- (under "Current - Wilson Blvd. Widening lanning- lanninq-section/plannin., -studies Corridor Study 19) mason oouievaru muenin t orriuor atua - meviseu iviaiiing mounuar ivia • aici i(..ia(3011 LQ _ TwinEagles & Country Club Co+Golf Club J 0 ` 1 • rii' 25hAVE N Randall BLVD ,OrCocohatchee Canal � Immokalee.RD 24th AVE NW 24th AVE NE p 1 22nd AVE NW 22nd AVE NE 7 co v CD 20th AVE NW 20th AVE NE A 075 o A j O v m 18th AVE NE 18th AVE NW � U y Jun BLVD W 3 Jung BLVD E U � ~ 16th AVE NW Y 16th AVE NE o � U 0 14th AVE NW 14th AVE NE 12th AVE NW 12th AVE NE Olde Florida Golf Club 10th AVE NW 10th AVE NE Cypress Canal Golden Gate Main Canal Cypress Canal m m U c cc 2 z z z z z z z z z z z z z(D Z z z z z z F c~n c~n u~i u~i a U) cn cn rn cn U) H H U) U) (n fn � In In fn t a L L L t t -O N P5 " In CI)N V (O CO (D O N - — 00 N C M � N N Golden Gate BLVD W Golden Gate B County Road Local Road Canal 0. 195 0. 0.75 1 Water Body Miles co U Golf Course Study Area Original Notified Parcel Owners Additional Notified Parcel Owners