DSAC Agenda 01/05/2022co Ier C: v014 4ty
Growth Management Department
Development Services Advisory
Committee
Meeting
Wednesday, January 5, 2022
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Department
Conference Room 609/610
If you have any questions or wish to meet with
staff, please contact
Trish Mill at 252-8214
C017 C O14VIt
y
Growth Management Department
Development Services Advisory Committee
Agenda
Wednesday, January 5, 2022
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Building, Conference Rooms 609/610
NOTICE:
Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts the
time. Speakers are required to fill out a "Speaker Registration Form", list the topic they wish to address and hand it
to the Staff member before the meeting begins. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and speak into a
microphone. State your name and affiliation before commenting. During the discussion, Committee Members may
direct questions to the speaker.
Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please leave the room to
conduct any personal business. All parties participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules of Order
and wait to be recognized by the Chairman. Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the Hearing
Reporter can record all statements being made.
1. Call to order - Chairman
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes:
a. DSAC Meeting— December 1, 2021
4. Public Speakers
5. Staff Announcements/Updates
a. Development Review Division — [Jaime Cook]
b. Code Enforcement Division — [Mike Ossorio]
c. Public Utilities Department — [Eric Fey or designee]
d. Growth Management Dept. Transportation Engineering Division — [Jay Ahmad or designee]
e. Collier County Fire Review— [Shay Beddow or Shawn Hanson, Assistant Chief, Fire Marshal]
f. North Collier Fire Review — [Chief Sean Lintz or Deputy Director Daniel Zunzunegui]
g. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division — [Ken Kovensky]
h. Zoning Division — [Mike Bosi]
6. New Business
For more information, please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill @colliercountyfLgov
a. Update on the House Bill and Denied Status implementation [Rich Long]
b. Floodplain Management Ordinance changes [Christopher Mason]
7. Old Business
8. Committee Member Comments
9. Adjourn
FUTURE MEETING DATES:
February 2, 2022 — 3:00 pm
March 2, 2022 — 3:00 pm
April 6, 2022 — 3:00 pm
For more information, please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill @colliercountyfLgov
December 1, 2021
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Naples, Florida, December 1, 2021
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on
this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management
Department Building, Conference Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida, with the following members present:
Chairman: William J. Varian
Vice Chairman: Blair Foley
David Dunnavant
James E. Boughton
Clay Brooker (excused)
Chris Mitchell
Robert Mulhere (excused)
Mario Valle
Norman Gentry
Marco Espinar
Laura Spurgeon-DeJohn (excused)
Jeremy Sterk (excused)
Jeff Curl
John English
Mark McLean
ALSO PRESENT: Jamie French, Deputy Department Head, GMD
Michael Ossorio, Director, Code Enforcement
Lorraine Lantz, Planner, Transportation Engineering
Eric Fey, Senior Project Manager, Public Utilities
Ken Kovensky, Director, Operations & Regulatory Management
Mike Bosi, Director, Planning & Zoning
Jaime Cook, Director, Development Review
Patricia Mill, Operations Analyst/Staff Liaison
Shar Beddow, Captain of Fire Prevention, Greater Naples Fire District
December 1, 2021
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Management Department.
1. Call to Order - Chairman
Chairman Varian called the meeting to order at 3 p.m. A quorum consisting of I I members was
convened.
2. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Curl moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Valle. Carried unanimously, 11-0.
3. Approval of Minutes
a. DSAC Meeting — Nov. 3, 2021
Mr. Curl moved to approve the minutes of the Nov. 3, 2021, meeting, with one exception
involving No. 8: Mr. Mitchell thanked Mr. French, Ms. Cook and the PPO, not Mr. Curl. Second
by Mr. Mitchell. Carried unanimously,11-0.
b. DSAC LDR Subcommittee Meeting —June 15, 2021
Mr. Foley moved to approve the minutes. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously, 11-0.
4. Public Speakers
None
5. Staff Announcements/Updates
a. Development Review Division — [Jaime Cook, director]
Ms. Cook provided updates:
• The division is incredibly busy.
• We promoted one of our senior planners to a principal planner in the planning section.
• The senior planner position is posted, and we've filled a planner position; that employee will
start in 2'/2 weeks.
• Senior Environmental Specialist Tabatha Cole moved to Virginia, so her position was posted
and has closed. Interviews are in progress to fill the position.
b. Code Enforcement Division — [Mike Ossorio, director]
Mr. Ossorio provided a report, "Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report. Oct. 22 Nov. 21,
2021, Highlights " for informational purposes. He reported that:
• There were no community cleanups for the month.
• Outreach activities were conducted at several community associations — Golden Gate City,
North Naples, Riviera Golf Estates, Cooper Cove, Brookside, Goodland — and two CRA
meetings.
• About 652 cases were opened, about the same as last year, but he'd like that to go higher, as it
was last year, in the 800s, but retention is an issue and we're working with Jamie's office on
that.
• Lien searches are still above 1,000.
• Housing Authority: Two houses were demolished in East Naples and Immokalee.
• Four executive summaries were done this month.
• $928,000 in fines were waived and about $174,000 in fines were collected, about 18%.
2
December 1, 2021
• Our QAQC this month was: fair and objective, 88%; professional, 94%; courteous, 96%;
knowledgeable, 90%; overall, 86%, percentages that are not bad for Code Enforcement.
c. Public Utilities Department — [Eric Fey or designee]
Mr. Fey provided a monthly report on response times, "Letters ofAvailabiliu, Utility Deviations
and FDEP Permits, " for informational purposes. He stated:
• All time charts show a decline in volume over the last couple of months, accompanied by a
decline in response time, which is good news.
• He intends to get caught up on availability letters each month.
• We had to repost the project manager position because there was only one decent candidate;
an interview will be scheduled, and he can use Key Staff personnel to assist.
• FDEP revised its Wastewater Construction Permit form (DEP 62-604.300(3)(a)
Notification/Application for Constructing a Domestic Wastewater Collection/Transmission
System). We prepared templates to aid in getting those applications approved. As of Oct. 4,
the new form is required and DEP's policy is if an old form was signed and sealed by an
engineer prior to Oct. 4, it's considered in -transit and it will be accepted; if it's received after
that, it won't be accepted. A new form will be required. We're updating our templates for the
new form.
• There have been some design criteria changes. The old standard was the 1997 10-state
standards (The Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, RSWF, as referenced in
the Florida Administrative Code). We were working on standards that were more than 20
years old. They've now been updated to 2014 standards and we're still in the process of
determining what changed.
• One change is that in the past, pump stations with a flowrate of 1,200 GPM or more had to
have flow measurement. That number was lowered to 350 GPM, so some larger pump
stations may now require flow meters, per DEP. The standard flow -meter magnetic part is
already on our approved product list. As other changes come to light, they will be presented
to DSAC.
• Industry forum meetings have not resumed due to staffing shortages and COVID, but he
hopes to resume them early next year and get a consultant to pick up where Davidson
Engineering left off.
• Two independent efforts are going on. Any time you do a grinder -pump station or a private
pump station you must come to us for a utility deviation, which is an inefficient way to
proceed. There needs to be uniformity and control so we're not maintaining ourselves.
• In an effort to modernize, we've been asked to put together standards for fiber -based pump
stations, rather than radio-SKADA, which is what we've used for the past two decades. Fiber
is better for real-time communication with pump stations, response time, reporting and
diagnostics. It eliminates the need for an antenna at pump stations so it's better aesthetically.
Antennas are susceptible to wind, tree and hurricane damage. After Hurricane Irma, there
were no issues at fiber -based stations because fiber networks have slack. Fiber -based also
offers better resiliency and sight security (they can operate cameras) and facilitates additional
IT services, such as Wi-Fi and access control. It will cost more per pump station. Preliminary
estimates are $10,000415,000 per pump station, $345 per linear foot of fiber-optic cable.
The numbers are on our IT contract for maintaining the county's fiber network.
• There's some question whether we should include the work in the subdivision for the
developer to perform and convey to us, which may impact our conveyance process, or if we
should provide the option to have IT's contract installer do it.
December 1, 2021
The changes are just starting, and the county doesn't have fiber everywhere, but is gradually
getting rid of radio -based and transitioning to fiber. If fiber is available, it should be
disclosed in availability letters to show which standards should be used. We're asking for
your feedback.
A discussion ensued:
Mr. Valle asked about the study in Golden Gate City and moving that to encompass the rest of the
properties there. Where are you in the process for that Golden Gate plat?
Mr. Fey said that would kick off early next year with a water -transmission main project in Golden Gate
City, which is the first step in expanding water main service there. There will be many phases and old
infrastructure will be replaced, which may be a higher priority than the new infrastructure. There's so much
work there that we're in a master planning effort that's more focused on the waste -water side of the plan.
There's a "master -Master Plan" that was discussed for Golden Gate City, but with staff changes, it's
uncertain where that stands. There was a recent grant application to fund that effort. We're trying to
coordinate with other divisions to prevent the same street from being disturbed three different times for
water/sewage/drainage, sidewalks and lighting. There are many utility and infrastructure needs in Golden
Gate City. The only thing we're working on presently is expanding the wastewater plant from 1'/2 MGD to
5 MGD within the next two years. It's a design build that will make IQ water available, so we're
converting it from a wastewater -treatment plant to a water -reclamation facility and the effluent will be a
high quality for beneficial use. The only other thing scheduled is the water -main transmission project.
d. Growth Management Dept. Transportation Engineering Division — [Lorraine Lantz]
Ms. Lantz provided several updates:
• We were not awarded the $25 million RAISE Transportation grant for the Complete Streets
Project on Golden Gate Parkway for streets, bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaping, utility and
stormwater work, but we will determine what we can do better and probably apply again.
• The widening project on Wilson Boulevard, two lanes to four lanes from Immokalee Road to
Golden Gate Boulevard, is being studied. A public meeting was held several weeks ago. We
expect to bring it before the BCC by the second meeting in January and it will then move to the
design phase. Construction is funded in 2024.
• We're doing a scope and kickoff for the Immokalee Transportation Area Network to look at the
gaps in sidewalks, bike lanes and general transit and what needs can be filled through grants and
other funding to make it a better network.
e. Collier County Fire Review — [Shar Beddow or Shawn Hanson, Assistant Chief, Fire Marshal]
Capt. Beddow provided a report, Fire Review Statistics, and reported:
• The current volume for building plan reviews is 409, with a two-day turnaround.
• There were 689 inspections in the last month with a lean crew due to holidays.
• The Collier County Fire Marshal's meeting is 9 a.m. tomorrow at the main office next door.
• Last night and earlier in the day, she was on -call for two fires; one was completely
extinguished with one sprinkler head, causing no loss in a condo; the other didn't fare well.
• She thanked Code Enforcement, which is helpful and good to work with, very professional.
• If you're moving into an area where the is no water for utilities, we've had an increase
probably due to land costs due to people moving into the area. We developed checklists and
guidelines to assist in the water supply, so if you encounter that, reach out to me or Tom
Mastroberto, senior site plan reviewer, Fire Review.
• She's making her first foray into fire alarm code writing on the NFPA (National Fire
Protection Association) committee.
El
December 1, 2021
f. North Collier Fire Review — [Chief Sean Lintz or Deputy Director Daniel Zunzunegui]
None (excused)
g. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division — [Ken Kovensky]
Mr. Kovensky presented a report, "November 2021 Statistics, " which outlined building plan and
development review activities. He noted the following:
• The department had 4,248 applied permits, a small decrease from last month due to holidays,
but that was still 300-plus permits over last November, a decrease over last month and higher
than last year.
• The pattern for permits is similar.
• Our queue is still in good shape, finishing up on the 29a' and starting on the 30t', so we're only a
day behind, but we have staff still working on overtime.
• The Call Center is still steady and handled about 5,000 calls last month
• The planning technician positions were filled, with one Key Staff temp employee and one
outside candidate. Both are awaiting start dates.
• The two openings for budget analyst were filled; one starts Monday, and one is awaiting HR
processing for a start date.
• The department is losing a front -desk planner, who is moving to Development and Review, so
that position will be posted on Friday.
• Two others are open in our division, one a senior programmer analyst, which was vacated a few
weeks ago by Jason Badge, who moved into the manager position. His position is always a
difficult position to fill, so we rewrote the language and will be reposting it on Friday. The other
position, Principal Projects Manager, was vacated several months ago by Jeff Dunham, who
moved to internal controls and now he's the interim IT director. We've received no
applications.
• We're rotating our three client supervisors in the business center, Mike Perez, Sortie Clark -
Boyle and Connie Thomas, to provide them with cross -training in all areas. Two support the
building side, one through our electronic application, and one inhouse and satellite offices. The
other permitting supervisor handles client services at the Call Center. They will have different
roles but should still be able to handle your questions.
• Permits/Self-Issuing Permit projects is finishing up, which will speed up processing, make the
portal experience more efficient and will be a game -changer. We have a go -live date. Danny
Condomina will be presenting updates today.
h. Zoning Division — [Mike Bosi]
Mr. Bosi reported that:
• In November, the BCC adopted the AUIRs (Annual Update and Inventory Reports), so
infrastructure capacity should be available for development orders and building permits to be
issued without any issues.
• Eight petitions will go before the BCC on Dec. 14.
• One is a property rights element required by the state that will be adopted into the Growth
Management Plan. It spells out property owner rights the county provides during the rezoning
process.
• Another is a CCME amendment in which the state is requiring all jurisdictions to address sea -
level rise and try to develop a resiliency plan for some of the low-lying coastal areas by 2023.
December 1, 2021
• The Planning Commission on Dec. 2 will review that amendment and a model developed by OF
and FGCU professors for sea -level rise and anticipating issues in southwest Florida.
• In October, there were 30 land -use petitions, slightly higher than normal, and we're maintaining
a hectic pace.
• Positions opened for Land Development Code Manager, Amendment Code Manager and
Principal Planner in our conference planning section.
• The first of the golf course conversion petitions, the Golden Gate Golf Course, will be heard by
the Planning Commission on Jan. 20 and the BCC on Feb. 22. Following that will be the Riviera
Estate Golf Course conversion, which is going through the Intent to Convert process. Then it
must go through the PUD process.
• We've maintained a steady load of petitions for Planning Commission and the BCC, so I don't
see entitlements slowing down. The plats and SIPs will continue to go forward.
6. New Business
None
7. Old Business
a. GMD Public Portal changes and self -issuing permits [Operations & Regulatory Management]
GMD Senior Operations Analyst Danny Condomina provided a PowerPoint presentation,
"Upcoming Portal Changes, „ and reported:
• The launch will be Jan. 24, 2022, and testing is going well.
• A weekend before the launch, the system will not be available to test before it goes live.
• This PowerPoint presentation is available on the permitting webpage.
• The groups in the home page have increased and there are more application types, so that
allows us to ask more specific questions for those applications.
• Requirements for items that are uploaded to the portal were reduced.
• Two new applications were added: RV and Garage Sale Permits, Code Enforcement permits.
• Three more groups were added the Building Department options on the homepage: Building,
Remodel & Accessory Permits; Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Gas & Fire Permits; and
Right -of -Way, Sign and Well Permits.
• The old portal Planning Group becomes: Pre -Application and Planning Application; Special
Events, Zoning Certificates; Temporary Use, RV and Garage Sale; and Environmental Permits.
• Anything related to environmental now has its own group.
• We created new application types because we had issues receiving applications, especially
because the building application was very general. All accessory applications were under
Building, so it was removed and moved to the first drop menu.
• There will be new permit prefixes and PRBD will no longer be a permit type in the drop -down
menu. All PRBDs will be under Building/Remodel/Accessory Permits.
• The new application types allow us to be more specific with permits.
• Items causing confusion and phone calls were removed, such as questions about occupancy
code and construction type.
• We're trying to make it simpler with just six categories, hotels and motels.
• We met with Planning Review to make changes. For example, with single-family homes, it had
23 submittal/checklist items and was reduced to nine. But based on your answers to questions,
it will show other submittal items.
• Questions posed to site visitors will load other questions, instead of showing everything at
once.
n
December 1, 2021
• We made it a little smarter to make it easier for customers, so they won't be overwhelmed.
• Some questions will be handled later in the process because upfront submissions sometimes get
lost. Things that aren't needed for plan review, such as a Notice of Commencement, won't be
needed upfront.
• The same thing was done with the Subcontractor -Affirmation forms.
• If you are searching by permit number, you must search under that group.
• The best practice for searching permits is by address, a property search, which provides the
most information on a piece of property.
Mr. Curl questioned that, noting that he didn't see that option on that page. It was item four, not item one,
or the third question.
Mr. Condomina said that's under the groups, but the portal's property search link is always available to
click on to the left.
Mr. Condomina continued with the presentation:
• Self -issuing permits will not require a plan review. Based on your questions, it will go to self -
issuing or staff. No staff are involved all the way up to when a permit is issued.
• If you select a contractor and that person is not qualified, it will not let you move forward. If
you select the city of Naples or Marco Island, you can't move forward.
• When you hit the application button, you can pay fees online and print inspection cards and
permits.
• Garage Sale and RV Permit will be much easier because no fees are involved. The application
will load based on answers to questions.
• The permit page will continue to be updated and more resources will be available after
January. The newsletter that went out on Monday, the guide, videos and this presentation will
be on the webpage.
• If you want a demonstration, you can schedule time with our training coordinator or with me.
Mr. Curl asked if this was the new website, he'd seen two weeks ago, which he said was not intuitive.
Mr. Condomina said they didn't have that much involvement, so we're trying to fix our side of it. It has
since been updated and they're working on it. The PowerPoint, newsletter and videos will be available on a
subpage about the upcoming changes.
Chairman Varian asked if there were any changes to paper applications.
Mr. Condomina said there were no changes yet.
b. GMD Deputy Department Head Jamie French gave a presentation about vacancies and hiring
discussions:
• The discussion with the County Manager's Office to fill positions is set for January.
• He wants to fund 113 positions, including 35 plumbing, 26 mechanical, 26 electrical and 22
structural. These are all over the last calendar year, not fiscal year.
• Over 275,000 building inspections were performed last fiscal year, a 6% increase over the
previous fiscal year.
• Nearly 23,000 inspections were performed monthly.
• Currently, 54 full-time inspectors across the trades are employed, averaging 26 inspections
per day.
• The team is trying to squeeze all the efficiencies available to control reliability on paper and to
push things, so if anything can be automated, it will be.
7
December 1, 2021
• Under the ISO standards and efficiencies, we adopted, 15 is a really good number; 10 was
spoken about for average inspections but is not realistic under ISO standards.
• Under our operational design today, the average is 16 inspections. The reason why is the
average inspector drives 80 miles per day, compared with five miles daily for the cities of
Naples and Marco Island. They've got 12 miles as a coverage area and we've got 600 miles
and that's why we start/route inspectors from their homes, to capture as much efficiency as
possible. That's why we think if ISO says 10 inspections, we can still be 15-20.
• Under Marco Island's operational design, they perform 20 inspections per -day, per -inspector,
and that Building Official makes far less than the one in Naples.
• Plans Review and Plumbing processed 61,000 building permit applications in FY21, a 19%
increase over FY20. They averaged over 5,000 per month, just in plumbing.
• Growth has placed significant pressure on staff to review plans under the established state
deadlines. We're still pushing for the 10-15-business-day goal, but we're far from that.
• We need a licensed senior project manager in Jaime Cook's group.
• About 4,000 planning application reviews were performed in FY 21, a 17% increase.
• There were more than 2,700 right of way permits processed. The ROW program was adopted
with only two staff members from Transportation about five or six years ago at the County
Manager's request.
• Even though the state set guidelines of 10 inspections per day, per inspector, we're pushing
for 15-20 as a goal, but we're not hitting it, not by far, and that's the rationale for needing 15
more.
• About 4,000 plumbing applications were received in FY21, a 17% increase.
• More than 2,000 right-of-way permits were applied for, a 25% increase.
• We've seen such a drastic increase that we need someone other than just Alicia to do the
reviews.
• This position would assist right of way, site development plan reviews, applications for
stormwater management stations and utility standards. It would be a licensed engineer
position. It's one of the most sought-after jobs, the most vacant and hardest to fill because it's
highly competitive. Hopefully, after the payroll study, we can fill it.
• Field inspections (Joe Bianchi's area) totaled about 19,000, an I I 1/2increase.
• There were nearly 8,000 right-of-way inspections.
• Well inspections are on -time serviced and decreased by more than 30% due to all the activity
in Golden Gate Estates, and we have only one or two well inspectors.
• No contract well inspectors are available. We've got about five contracts, including one
through Nova Property Inspections LLC, and the other contractors the city of Naples uses, but
that didn't work out. Nova can only provide five or six.
• On -time percentages of inspections in this area continue to decline and that slows down jobs
on the CO side, not the Building Department side. It's preventing jobs from getting COs.
There are fewer of those inspectors and they're also driving many miles.
• Fund 131 positions: A Development Review Planner is needed to provide another planner to
Jaime's group.
• More than 1,400 Planning Application reviews were performed in FY21, up 32% over FY20.
• Almost 24,000 Building Permits for planning requirements were reviewed, a 23% increase.
Those permits required a planning review. Currently, only four staff members in this group
perform this level of review.
December 1, 2021
• On -time delivery goals have continued to decline in this area due to the volume and
complexity of the projects.
• Zoning is asking for a Principal Planner. From 2015-2018, the previous administration
borrowed from us and never returned positions, but their work requirements remained.
• Staff was taken from Growth Management and never restored. This is part of the reason why
petitions are slow. Ken Kovensky has shown where staff went over the past six to eight years,
somewhere else in Growth Management. These were positions that you supported in the past
and the BCC approved. It's all up to the County Manager's Office.
• In 2010, there were 299 approved FTEs. We never got to 299. After the layoffs, we were left
with 168 FTEs when I assumed my position here. At the time, we averaged 21,586 permits
during the calendar year, total plan reviews were 38 and total inspections were 74,000.
• 2016 was a good year, a year where we were balanced and getting efficiencies. There were
273 FTEs, with nearly 41,000 permits applied for, roughly 103,000-104,000 plan reviews,
averaging 233,000-234,000 inspections.
• Using that total number of applied permits, if 2016 was a perfect year, I need about 306 FTEs
to handle the 45,650 permits projected for this year. What I've presented today is nine more
employees at a minimum, which will total 287 employees, not the full 306. That doesn't
consider overtime or contract labor. I want to keep that option, so I think I'm better off asking
for the nine employees that I really need.
• We also have more than 20 positions we've been unable to fill and there's always going to be
a cycle of attrition.
• We're very supportive of the County Manager's efforts in doing a compensation study.
• We're using 70-80 contract employees and we're now over 4,500 hours of overtime, a couple
million dollars, including positions that don't get overtime and receive hour -for -hour pay.
Mr. French asked the board if was going in the right direction and a discussion ensued:
• Chairman Varian agreed he was.
• Mr. French noted that the former deputy county manager said he needed to reduce fees to
increase operating costs. I have no intention of asking for positions in exchange for a
reduction in fees. That cannot be supported long-term to meet the obligation for the dollars
that were collected that we owe you service for.
• Chairman Varian asked who was complaining about fees.
• Mr. French said no one was, but that was always the bargaining chip with the former
County Manager's Office team every time we asked for something.
• Mr. McClain said many other municipalities have similar hiring issues. He asked how the
committee could support him. He suggested that Mr. French ask for all employees he needs
and to be satisfied if the County Manager's Office agrees to half. How do we manage
clients' expectations? The county's turnaround times are well documented. Our clients can
see they should have a building permit in two, three or four weeks, but that time goes by,
and we have to explain that our hands are tied, we're understaffed and we're running late.
We can only fix our end. How do we support you to fix your end?
• Mr. Curl noted that in the private sector, they pay more for employees than the county
does. The county's internal model needs to be updated.
• Mr. French pointed out that Marco Island is paying a private provider a starting salary of
$94,000 yearly (he wasn't certain that included benefits) for a one- and two-family home
inspector's license. In comparison, the county pays $35,000-$40,000 for that position. If
private providers are paying that, local governments cannot compete. It's going to come
6
December 1, 2021
down to whatever this payroll study says whether I can hire employees in this competitive
market. We need to keep morale up. I've been told many times that I'm pro -development.
I'm not, I'm pro -committed and pro -customer service. Let's see what the payroll study says
and support me.
• Mr. McClain asked if the committee could support him with a formal request to the county
manager. He said clients call him daily about this problem, the delays, but noted that other
municipalities also have this problem, so how do we formally help you?
• Mr. French said he was going to meet with the County Manager this month or next month
and is hoping to get this on the BCC agenda in January or early February and he wants the
committee to be there to support it. If you have additional numbers you can share, bring
those so we're not speculating the market. He said he'd met with Florida's CFO and they're
watching a lot of different numbers and markets nationwide. We think we're probably two
to three years based on the state's projection, but the cost of living is not going down and
property values won't deflate, as they did in 2010. We need to continue to recognize the
impact your industry has on the local market. Without this industry, tourism, restaurants,
housing and affordable housing don't exist. It creates jobs.
• Mr. Dunnavant said it was disappointing that Mr. French was being confined by staff who
use pro -development as a negative.
• Mr. Valle said the development community provides the tax base. There is no real tax
revenue to pay for services for the rest of county government. He noted that industry is
paying fees to the Building Department for the entire 131 Fund, so why should we be asking
anybody for any positions?
• Mr. French said his department has a fiduciary responsibility and the county is a very
conservative government that doesn't like to increase staff. He's repeatedly asked the county
to consider privatization. One reason we don't privatize isn't cost, but availability and
control. Many plan reviewers from outside contractors do not work for us. It would take far
more time. On the inspection and non -technical side, answering phones, it works.
• We'll get a full report once we meet with the County Manager's Office.
• He asked for a moment of silence to recognize the passing of John Williams.
8. Committee Member Comments
None.
9. Adjourn
Next Meeting Dates
Jan. 5, 2022, 3 p.m.
Feb. 2, 2022, 3 p.m.
March 2, 2022, 3 p.m.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the
order of the Chair at 4:11 P.M.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Chairman, William Varian
U17
December 1, 2021
These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on , as presented , or as
amended
11
November 22, 2021— December 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report
November 22, 2021— December 21, 2021 Highlights
• Cases opened: 665
• Cases closed due to voluntary compliance: 290
• Property inspections: 2352
• Lien searches requested: 1409
Trends
Cases Opened Per Month
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21
Code Inspections Per Month
3198
^C-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21
This report reflects monthly data from November 22, 2021— December 21, 2021
November 22, 2021— December 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
5000
3000
2000
1000
2500
2000
1500
1000
9 1]
0
2020 2021
Bayshore Immokalee
Origin of Case
■Code Div. Initiated Cases
■ Complaint Initiated Cases
CRA�
Case Opened
Monthly
• Monthly Open Cases
Total Opened Cases to
Date (Report initiated
September 2018)
This report reflects monthly data from November 22, 2021— December 21, 2021
November 22, 2021— December 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
Site Develo
9%
Vegetation Requirements Animals Accessory Use
_ . ..,p — 11 ....1 .b 1%
8% 6%
Case Type Common Issues Associated with Case Type
Accessory Use — Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals — Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use — Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement — Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing — Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way, etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements — Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill, preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking etc.
e Abatement
30%
This report reflects monthly data from November 22, 2021— December 21, 2021
October 22, 2021— November 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
Site Develol
11%
Vegetation Requirements Animals Accessory Use , , , ,
vroperiy maintenance Parking Enforcement 1%
9% 6%
Case Type Common Issues Associated with Case Type'
Accessory Use — Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals — Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use — Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement — Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing — Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way, etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements — Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill, preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking etc.
sance
tement
12%
This report reflects monthly data from October 22, 2021— November 21, 2021
September 22, 2021— October 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
Site
Sign!
1%
Rig
Animals Accessory Use
Vegetation Requirements 1% o
so[ I I 1�o IandIki-
nent
7% 1%
Case Type Common Issues Associated with Case Type
Accessory Use — Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals — Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use — Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement — Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing — Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way, etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements — Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill, preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking etc.
This report reflects monthly data from September 22, 2021— October 21, 2021
60
50
40
v 30
c
m
20
10
0
Public Utilities Department
Engineering and Project Management Division
Response i ime - Letters of Availability
16
18
16
14
■ 12
10
a)
v
a
av
8
6
Jun-21 J u I-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21
Requests Completed Minimum Average � Maximum Requests Received
32
4
2
0
6
5
4
7
1
0
Public Utilities Department
Engineering and Project Management Division
response Time - Utility Deviations
23
Ilk
1.9
15
11
3.0
1.2 4
0.9
Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21
� Requests Completed Sufficiency Review Time Substantive Review Time Requests Received
25
20
15
10
5
0
a�
s
v
Of
45
40
35
30
25
15
10
5
Ct
Public Utilities Department
Engineering and Project Management Division
Response Time - FDEP Permits
97
Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21
Requests Completed � Initial Review Time � Revision Review Time Director Approval Time
Nov-21
Requests Received
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
N
Resources
Standards and Procedures
ORDINANCE
Ordinance 2004_31, Utilities Standards and Procedures
Ordinance 200�-6o, Amendment to Utilities Standards and Procedures
Ordinance 2018-36, Utilities Standards and Procedures
UTILITIES STANDARDS MANUAL
Complete Manual - All Sections
DESIGN CRITERIA
Section 1- Design Criteria
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Section 2 - Technical Specifications
DETAILS AND CAD FILES
Section 3 - Utilities Detail Drawings
Access individual CAD files below
FILE DESCRIPTION
G-1 Unpaved Area Trench Backfill Detail
G-2
G-2A
G-2B
G-3
G-4,
G-5
G-6
G-7_
G-8
G-9.
G-9A
G-10
REVISION DATE
04/2oo6
G-11
NP-1
NP-2
NP-4,
NP-El
NP-E2
NP-E3
NP-E4,
NP-E5
NP-E6
NP-E7
NP-E8
NP-E9
W-1
W-2
W-3
W-4
W-5
W-6
W-8
W-9
W-9A
W-11
W-11A
W-12
W-12A
W-13
W-14,
W-14A
W-16
WW-1
WW-2
WW-3
WW-4.
WW-5
WW-6
WW-7_
WW-7A
WW-7B
WW-7C
WW-8
WW-8A
WW-8B
WW-9
LAW-9A
LAW-9B
LAW-9C
LAW-9D
LAW-9E
WW-lo
WW-11
WW-12
WW-13
WW-15
WW-16
WW-17_
WW-18
WW-18A
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Utility Deviation Form
Any request for a deviation from established water, wastewater, or IQ water standards or procedures shall
be submitted on a Utilities Deviation Form.
Utility Deviation Form (updated 07/18)
Please email PDF's of Utilities Deviation Forms to Utility Planning: Utili-yPlanning@co lliercountyfl.gov
Appendix B: Water Meter Sizing Form
Water Meter Sizing Form PDF (Updated 07/2018)
Water Meter Sizing Form EXCEL MS Excel based automated calculator (NEW in 2018)
Appendix C: Final Waiver of Liens
Final Waiver of Liens - For conveyance of utilities facilities to the County. (Updated 07/2018)
Appendix D: Utilities Conveyance Checklist
Utilities Conveyance Checklist (Updated 07/2018)
Appendix E: Vendor Product Approval Application Form
Complete and submit this form to apply to be added to the County Approved Product List, Appendix F.
Vendor Product Approval Application Form (Updated 07/2018)
Appendix F: County Approved Product List
County Approved Product List (Updated 07/2018)
Appendix G: Approved Backflow Devices
Approved Backflow Devices
Planning
MASTER PLANS
2014 CCWSD Master-CIP Plan Summary Report
10 YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN
io-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan
ANNUAL UPDATE & INVENTORY REPORT
AUIR
SERVICE AREA MAPS
Potable Water Map
Wastewater Map
IQ Water Map
OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS
■ City of Naples
■ City of Marco Island
■ Immokalee Water & Sewer District
■ Ave Maria Utility Company
■ Port of the Islands Community Improvement District
■ Everglades City/Chokoloskee
■ Copeland — Please contact the registered agent. Click here to access the State of Florida
Division of Corporations records search page.
ZONING INFORMATION
Development
FDEP PERMIT APPLICATIONS
FDEP PERMIT APPLICATION TEMPLATES
(The links will download .zip files of each type of application)
REVISED FDEP Permit Applications should be sent to utilitvDlanning@colliercountyf—l.gov
colliercountyl..gov
Water - Construction of Water Main Extensions For PWS
North and South County Regional Water Treatment Plants (NCRWTP, SCRWTP)
Orange Tree Water Treatment Plant (OTWTP)
Wastewater - Constructing a Domestic Wastewater Collection/Transmission
System
North County Water Reclamation Facilities (NCWRF)
South County Water Reclamation Facilities (SCWRF)
Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant (GGWWTP)
Northeast Utility Wastewater Treatment Plant (2)
Zip File of All FDEP Permit Application Templates
Calculator
Wastewater Flow Calculations (Excel .xls format)
FDEP Preparation Checklists
The checklists are meant as an aid in preparing the FDEP forms and do not relieve the preparer of
responsibility to provide complete and accurate information. The checklists do not need to be submitted
with the form.
Water Checklist
Wastewater Checklist
REQUEST UTILITY INFORMATION
GIS Screenshots
To request GIS screenshots for approximate locations of existing utilities, please send an email request
to Utility Planning@colliercountyfl.gov or Bryan. Feir a colliercouniyfl. gov.
Please note that GIS screenshots show approximate locations of existing utilities and should be used for
reference or preliminary design only.
Record Drawings
For more precise locations of existing utilities, you may request record drawings. For capital projects and
existing infrastructure, please send a request to Bryan. Feir@colliercount- goy.
For record drawings of existing utilities in private subdivisions, please send a request
to GMDRecordsRoom@colliercountyfl.gov.
REQUEST AN AVAILABILITY LETTER
To request a Letter of Availability, you may send an email to Utility Planning
at UtilityPlanning,@colliercountyfl.gov and include the following:
• General project information
• Folio number and/or address of the property
• Nature of the request
• Contact information of the individual making the request
Your request will be placed in a queue and the letter will be drafted and issued in a timely manner
REQUEST A UTILITY PRE -SUBMITTAL MEETING
Please email one request to the following:
UtiliiyPlanning,@colliercountyfl.gov
Benjamin.Bullert@colliercountyfl.gov
Daniel.Roman@colliercountyfl.gov
Brett.Rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov
Joanna.Nichol son @ colliercountyfl. gov
REQUEST A UTILITY DEVIATION
To submit a Utility Deviation Request, click here to download the Utility Deviation Request Application
Form (Appendix A of USM).
Please send completed application forms to Utility Planning,@colliercountyfl.gov. Upon receipt of your
application, the PUEPMD team will review your request. Approvals, requests for additional information
and rejections will be sent via email notification from the SIRE Work Flow system along with contact
information to address any issues.
Construction
REQUEST DBPR FORM CERTIFICATION
To request a DBPR form certification for
County water only - Utility Planning@colliercountyfl.gov
County water and/or sewer - Sam.Jinkins@colliercountyfl.gov
REQUEST SERVICE CONNECTION
Contact Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management
7- 0
er County
December 2021
.MonthCy Statistics
-- - _•lt�fr.__ ---y8• --
-800
COLLIER COUNTY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
it
12/2021 Growth Management Department
Building Plan Review Statistics
All Permits Applied by Month
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
1111111111111111111111111
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
U a L i >+ C ai a i U C -0 L L i+ C al Q. — i U
a)M a) 0-fC 7 a)U o d M d R Q f0 3 3 0)U o d
0� LL Q 2 Q N O z o n LL 2 Q Q 0 0 z o
Top 15 of 35 Building Permit Types Applied
Plumbin
Electrical, 244
315
Roof, 343
Solar, 105� _
Shutters/Doors/
Windows, 451 ,
ROW Residential,
123
, 220
Pool, 206
Fence, 165
Bldg New
Mechanical, 1 & 2
533 Res, 321
Bldg
Add/Alt, 211
Aluminum Structure, 156
Well Permits, 114
Sign/Flagpole, 53
Building Plan Review Statistics
Monthly 1 & 2 Family Total
Construction Value by Applied Date
$200,000,000
$150,000,000
$100,000,000
$50,000,000
s.L
rn o 0 0 0
UCO Z3
i C Q U i C Q U
s 1 &2 Family
Monthly Total Construction Value by Applied Date
$200,000,000
$150,000,000
$100,000,000
$50,000,000
Monthly Multi -family & Commercial Total
Construction Value by Applied Date
$200,000,000
$150,000,000
$100,000,000
$50,000,000
M o 0 0 0
U L C Q U L C Q U
U) 0
(Multi -family Commercial
rn o (D0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
U C >+ C 0) Q > U C T C LA d > U
C) M a) as 0- m = � � a> o 0 M a) as 0- m � � = � " o a)
p g Q U z o
--$---1&2 Family +Multi -family Commercial
Building Plan Review Statistics
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
New Construction Building Permits Issued by Month
O O O O O O O O O O O O O � T- r � T- r � r � � r
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
m m d fC Q C0 3 -3 = d V O d M d 0 Q M 3 -3 3 d V O d
2" a Cn 0 z 0
Dec-
19
Jan-
1 20
Feb-
20
Mar-
1 20
Apr-
20
iMay-1Jun-
1 20
1 20
Jul-
20
Aug-
20
Sep-
20
Oct-
20
Nov-
20
Dec-
20
Jan-
21
j Feb-
21
Mar-
21
Apr-
21
May-
21
Jun-
21
Jul-
1 21
Aug-
21
Sep-
21
Oct-
21
Nov-
21
Dec-
21
■ Commercial
5
9
4
7
4
5
7
5
6
3
3
3
6
7
5
11
8
12
9
6
13
13
3
4
8
■ Multi -family
4
11
9
9
9
5
2
10
10
11
1
7
7
11
19
11
6
6
17
11
15
5
6
12
9
0 1&2 Family
182
232
234
250
192
205
196
234
296
248
352
244
314
357
195
386
412
460
445
374
403
218
330
286
295
New Multi -family Building
Permits Issued by Month
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
New Commercial Building
Permits Issued by Month
iiii'
il�ll�llllll�l�l�l�lllililllllllllilil�l�l�ll
iiiiniiiiiiiiiiiii
.
..
..
.
..
..
12/2021
Growth Management
Department
Building Inspections Statistics
Building Inspections
30,000
25,000
1 111
111 r (M
LO LO M 00 O a)00 00
_ M
LO M M M O O M O M O O wCM N M r N
1 1 1 1 N N N N O ti N O 00 M N N O N N N
N O N q o
N
r
111
1
Types of Building Inspections
Septic,
N N N N N N
= O V O N
Q w 0 Z 0
f, 450
Well,
140
250
200
150
100
50
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Land Development Services
Statistics
All Land Development Applications Applied by Month
O O O O O O O O O O O O O r T- T- r T- r r T- T- T- T- T-
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
U i .0 L L >, C 0 Q. t+ i 6 C -0 L L >, C M Q. — i V
a) fC 0) f6 Q M 3 3 d V O d R 0 0 Q M 7 N V O d
0 tL 2 Q 2 n Q 0 0 Z o� LL 2 Q 20 0 Z o
Top 5 Land Development Applications Applied
157 within the Last 6 Months
Zoning Verification
Letter
133
120
112
i I
Special Event Permit Site Development Plan Vegetation Removal
Insubstantial Change Permit
74
Lot Split
Land Development Services
35 1
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
Statistics
Pre -application Meetings by Month
O O O O O O O O O O O O O V- r T" T r r T- r V- r
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
(% C M - - >, C M Q - i U C -0 - L � C M Q — i U
0' LL 2 Q CU 3 3 °' 0 z° 0 n LL 2 Q a) 0 z° 0
Front Zoning Counter Permits Applied by Month
0 O O O O O O O O O O O O T" r � T- � � r � � � T- �
N N N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N
�.: C -0 L - A C M Q i 0 C .0 - L � C M a — i 0
0 n LL 2 Q m °' 0 z° 0 n LL 2 Q M 3 °' 0 z° 0
■ Temporary Use Commercial Certificates
r�Growth-•,
is'
60
50
(OD 40
CD
ca
a
4-
° 30
d
E
Land Development Services
Statistics
Number of New Subdivisions Recorded per Month
I LLLLI
I
I
I
WJ
IIH
O O O O O O O O O O O O O r
r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
> > u
0 O d M Q- M ' 3 d V O d R d Q R 3 a> U O a)
o� LL 2 Q M—) Q U) O z o� LL M Q 2" Q cn 0 z o
54
Plat Pages Recorded per Month
59
21
28
Z 20 17 13 1415 10 17
10 9 7 8 g g 7 11 9 11
5 4 5
0
I■ ■ ■: ■■
O O O O O O O O O O O O O T-
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
A a1 ci C M L L C Q. — i 0 C.0 Q i L �% C 01 } i U
d W d O- M d V O d W d Q O 3 d V O d
onLL <M Q00z0nLL�Q2 QCo0zo
Yearly Totals
2019 - 31
2020 - 25
2021- 33
Yearly Totals
2019 - 131
2020 - 152
2021 - 188
Land Development Services
Statistics
Monthly Total of Subdivision Applications
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r
r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
ci C .0 L L i, C 0 0.r i U C .0 L L >, C 6 Q r i V
GN M d fa Q fC 3 3 d V Q fC 3 d V O d
o n li 2 Q 2 Q to 0 Z 0� li 2 Q 20 0 Z 0
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
Monthly Total of Subdivision Re-submittals/Corrections
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r
r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
V C .0 L L >, C 6 Q — i 0 C M L L >, C 0 Q. — i 0
a)fC d M Q M 3 3 d v O d M N M Q M 3 3 d v O d
0 n LL 2 Q 2 n Q 0 0 z 0 n LL 2 4 2 n a 0 0 z 0
Land Development Services
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Statistics
Monthly Total of Site Plan Applications
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
01 O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r
r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 n Li 2 Q M 3 ) 0 z 0 n Li 2 Q c� �� n (D 0 z a
Monthly Total of Site Plan Re-submittals/Corrections
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
O O (D O O O O (D O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r T-
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C � L L �, C a) Q - i 0 C -0 L L >, C 0) Q � i u
0 n Li 2 Q f° 3 d 0 z a n Li 2 Q `° =' = a) 0 z 0
Reviews for Land Development
Services
Number of Land Development Reviews
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
r N N N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N 1V N N N N N N
d fC d fC Q. (a 7 7 d V O d M d fC Q. (a 7 7 d V O d
o LL Q Q 0 O z 0 n LL � Q�� Q 0 O z o
Percentage Ontime for the Month
0 Ontime 0 Late
Land Development Services
Statistics
Total Applied Construction Valuation Estimate
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
6� O O O O O O O O O O O O T— T— T— r r r � � T— r r
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 n LL Q �a 3' a� 0 z 0 n LL � Q �° 3'M aD 0 z G
■ Construction Estimate Utility Estimate
Site & Utility Inspections
90
80 I
70 0
Y 60
i
E 50 , I
v
40 I I
c �
30
U
U1
Q 20
C
10
0
v N (6 Q (O 7 7 N U O N c6 N fl- r6 7 7 4J U O UJ
L.L Ln O Z LL Q Q Ln O Z 0
■ Final Subdivision Inspection ■ Final Utility Inspection
Preliminary Subdivision Inspection ■ Preliminary Utility Inspection
■ Tie In Inspection
Fire Review Statistics
10
9
8
7
11
Al
rTo 5
0
Building Fire Review Average Number of Days
4
3
2 —
1
p- - - - - - - - - - -
rn
U C i, c W Q +--� > U c -0 i, c W Q a-', > U
a1 ra aJ M Q 7 —� � a) U 0 a) ro a) M Q M 7 � a) U 0 a)
p LL g¢ Q to O z o LL g Q g Q cn 0 Z
Total Number of Building Fire Reviews by Month
Fire District Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec-
19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
0 North Collier 470 410 458 633 565 510 642 645 564 558 588 429 586 427 482 630 706 741 1044 687 775 608 654 504 449
Collier County (Greater Naples) 359 476 361 397 355 324 462 418 409 400 439 403 446 460 475 451 473 456 586 401 480 382 411 409 393
Planning Fire Review Average Number of Days
10
9
8
7
6
5
0 4
3
2
1
0
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-I r-I r-I -1 —1 -1
U C -0 c 75 _ W a +� > U C -0 c on c- +� > U
C)ra (1)ru a � = = a) 0 v ro (1)(U a co = = a) 0 a,
o „L g a g, a'A O z 0— LL g a g, Q Ln o z o
Total Number of Planning Fire Reviews by Month
Fire District
Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec-
19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
■ North Collier 56 57 39 48 38 36 33 42 33 47 44 37 32 25 33 37 39 39 55 32 43 23 48 41 49
Collier County(Greater Naples) 63 57 72 62 48 62 62 52 61 59 62 61 51 44 53 71 72 60 74 61 39 53 80 70 68
HB 1059, 2021 Legislature
An act relating to construction permits, amending Sections 125.022, 125.56, 166.033,
553.79, 553.792, and 553.794 F.S. 2021
Impact on Permit Process:
State statute now requires that the county deny a permit if the applicant fails to submit
corrections to a rejected application that corrects all noted deficiencies within 10 business
days after receiving the corrections notice. The legal interpretation and intent of the state
statute for denying an application is to require the applicant to reapply for a new permit,
forfeiting any fees associated with the denied application. To avoid this negative impact
on our customers, Collier County has created a waiver based on the statute language,
"...unless the applicant agrees to a longer period in writing." Applicants may agree to
waive the review period at time of application by selecting agree. When agree is selected
or a waiver form is uploaded as part of the corrections submittal the county can continue
the review process if the customer fails to meet the 10 business days or has more
correction comments after addressing the first notice.
Simplified overview:
• Requiring a county that issues building permits to post all information on website,
allowing electronic submission, establishing performance deadlines with fee reduction
penalties for failure to meet those deadlines, requiring the applicant to take certain action
within a specified time.
• For commercial permits, county to verify application within 10 days and after completed
application has been paid for, county has 45 days to provide correction comments or
issue permit.
• A building permit for a single-family residential dwelling must be issued within 30
business days after receiving the permit application unless the permit application fails to
satisfy the Florida Building Code or the enforcing agency's laws or ordinances.
• The permit application as applied to the time deadlines identified in the amended state
statutes identified in HB 1059 shall be the completed application, including payments,
attachments, drawings, or other requirements.
• The applicant has 10 business days after receiving the written notice to submit revisions
to correct the permit application and that failure to correct the application within 10
business days will result in a denial of the application unless the applicant agrees to a
longer period in writing.
• If the applicant submits revisions within 10 business days after receiving the written notice,
the local enforcement agency has 10 business days after receiving such revisions to
approve or deny the building permit.
Definitions as implemented:
single-family residential dwelling: includes all building permits applied for associated with a
detached oneand two family dwelling property.
permit application: shall be the completed application, including payments, attachments, drawings,
or otherrequirements.
denial, deny: means refuse to accept requiring re -submittal of new
permit.will: means shall, required to.
original amount: shall be the application fee. "Each reduction shall be based on the original
amount of thebuilding permit fee."
Summation of changes:
Collier County remains dedicated to processing all permits in the timeliest manner possible:
• To properly establish and monitor the start and finish of the deadlines established in section 553.79,
F.S. for single-family residential dwelling permits, we have changed the over the counter and one
day permits payment process to be consistent with all residential review permits.
• Section 553.79(16)(b), F.S. 2021 requires the county to deny the permit application if the applicant
fails to submit revisions to correct the application within 10 business days. Applicants may agree to
waive the review period at time of application by selecting agree. When agree is selected or a
waiver form is uploaded as part of the corrections submittal the county can continue the review
process if the customer fails to meet the 10 business days or has more correction comments after
addressing the first notice.
Link:
Waiver of Review Time Limits
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION DIVISION
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples FL 34104 Phone (239) 252-2428
WAIVER OF REVIEW TIME LIMITS OF SECTION 553.79 (16) F.S.
FOR SINGLE FAMILY PERMITS
Re: Building Permit #:
Date:
Applicant hereby elects to waive the time limits stated under Section 553.79(16)(a)
through(e) F.S. (2021) to ensure that the building permit is not denied as required in said
section and to extend the review process as necessary.
Printed Name
Waiver of Review Time Limits 10.1.2021
Applicant Signature
y
� •_ — � -' T �� 'ice--+ + 4L- •■}
� a
-��
'1. rMir ;
■
�t
Op
' - r r i �a
■
• S
ri
rAgo,
Manufactured Home Replacement Elevation Requirements
for Existing (Pre -FIRM) Manufactured Home Parks
Code of Federal Regulations - 44 CFR 60.3(c)(12)
The National Flood Insurance Program regulations (44 CFR Section 60.3) allow manufactured homes that
are installed in "existing manufactured home parks or subdivisions" to be elevated on "reinforced piers or
other foundation elements of at least equivalent strength that are no less than 36 inches in height above
grade," even if that means the lowest floors are below the base flood elevation. However, this option is not
available when a manufactured home is substantially damaged by flooding. This provision is known as the
"36-inch option."
• The NFIP Community Rating System (CRS) establishes prerequisites for participation in the program
and prerequisites to achieve certain classification levels. In 2020 FEMA announced new prerequisites for
CRS communities to attain or retain a Class 8 or better. CRS communities that do not satisfy the Class 8
prerequisites can expect to be retrograded to a Class 9.
• One Class 8 prerequisite is to adopt and enforce a requirement of at least one foot of freeboard for al
residential buildings. Starting with the 51h Edition Florida Building Code (FBC), all buildings within the
scope of the FBC are required to be elevated or protected to at least BFE plus 1 foot, including one -
and two-family dwellings.
• To fully meet the Class 8 prerequisite for at least one foot of freeboard, CRS communities must
eliminate the 36-inch option.
Figure A I Figure B
Minimum NFIP requirement allowed ONLY for
replacement units in 'existing manufactured home
parks and subdivisions" (defined term), except if
replacing a unit that was substantially damaged by
flooding -
Allows replacement units to have the lowest floor
below the BFE-
Elevation in compliance with the FBC, Residential
(minimum BFE + 1 ft). Some communirties modify the
FB, R to require additional freeboard.
EI iminating the 36-inch option affects ONLY
replacements units in 'existing manufactured home
parks'-
Manufactured Home Park Locations (Sample) - Collier County
As of October 2021, the following
statistics were observed regarding the
count of Existing (Pre -FIRM) and New
(Post -FIRM) manufactured home parks:
• Total MHP: 118
Collier County M H P
• Pre-FIRM:80* 1
0 Post -FIRM 36
CRS What If Statement - June 2021
Community: COLLIER COUNTY'
State:
FLORIDA
Countyi COLLIER COUNTY
Clo:
120057
Current CRS Gass = b
jpnntatue Versio0l
TOTAL $FHA *
X-STDIAR/A99 #
PRP ***
P IF
74,114 53.301
6,634
14,179
PREMIUM
$33,398,663 $23.286.788
$4,290,482
$5.821.793
AVERAGE PREMIUM
$451 $437
$647
$411
_ CRS Clasr —
— — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
09
Per Policy
$24
$29
$36
$01
I-
Per Community
$1,790,785
$1,552,445
$238,340
$01
—
08
— — — —
Per Policy
— — — — — —
$45
—
$58
— — —
$36
—
$U
Per Community
$3,343,230
$3,104,890
$238,340
$0
07
Per Policy
$56
$87
$36
SO
Per Community
$4,895,674
$4,657,335
$238,340
SO
06
Per Policy
$90
$117
$72
SO
Per Community
$6,686,453
$6,209,7W
$476,673
SO
05
Per Policy — — — — —
— — — — — $111 —
— — — $146 —
— — — $72 — —
— — — se-
-
Per Community — — — —
— — — — — $8,238,897
$7,762,225— —
——$476,673 — —
— — _ SO
04
Per Policy
$132
$175
$72
SO
Per Community
$9,791,342
$9,314,670
$476,673
SO
03
Per Policy
$153
$204
$72
SO
Per Community
$11,343,787
$10,867.114
$476,673
SO
02
Per Policy
$174
$233
$72
SO
Per Community
$12,895,232
$12,419,559
$476,673
SO
01
Per Policy
$195
$262
$72
SO
Per Community
$14,448,677
$13,972,004
$476,673
SO
* SHFA SZones A. AE, Al-A30, V. V1-V30, AO, and AH)- Discount varies depending on class_
* SFHA (Zones A99, AR, ARIA, ARIAE, ARIAI -A30, ARfAH, and ARJAO): 10% discount for Classes 1-6, 5% discount for Classes 7-9.
**
Preferred Risk Policies are not eligible for CRS Premium Discounts.
III
i
Elevation & Permitting Requirements for
Accessory Structures
Detached accessory structures: Detached accessory structures that are
not elevated (garages, tool sheds, storage buildings, steel ISO 10'-20'-40'
storage containers, etc.) may be positioned on the ground or a slab,
properly vented, and adequately anchored to withstand wind and
buoyancy forces, or secured to piers. A property owner must provide a
signed Declaration of Land Restriction (Non -Conversion Agreement)
prior to the issuance of the certificate of completion for detached
accessory structures that are not elevated and are greater than 120
square feet.
Changes to FMO-2019 Ordinance Accessory Structure
Siting Requirements
Detached accessory structures: Detached accessory structures used only for parking or
storage that are not elevated (garages, tool sheds, storage buildings, steel ISO 10'-20'-40'
storage containers, etc.) may be positioned on the ground or a slab below the base flood
elevation provided:
Structure Size < 600 sq. ft
r_
a
f
f
Standard Permitting Process
If elevated to BFE: EC Required.
If below BFE: No EC Required - Flood
Vent Product documentation required.
Inspector will verify vents have been
installed.
Structure Size Between
600 sq ft. & 1200 sq ft.
�� WI
Administrative Variance Required
If elevated to BFE: EC Required.
If below BFE: No EC Required - Flood
Vent Product documentation required.
Inspector will verify vents have been
installed.
Structure Size >1200 sq. ft
Variance Required - to be reviewed by
Hearing Examiner
If elevated to BFE : EC Required.
If below BFE: No EC Required - Flood
Vent Product documentation required.
Inspector will verify vents have been
installed.
• Are one story and have flood openings in accordance with Section
R322.2 of the Florida Building Code, Residential.
• Are anchored to resist flotation, collapse or lateral movement
resulting from flood loads.
• Have flood damage -resistant materials used below base flood
elevation plus one (1) foot.
• Have mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems, including
plumbing fixtures, elevated to or above the base flood elevation
plus (1) foot.
ccessr-))ry S,,-r r uc- -tr Lj r e Perrn': ins J 8 -iO2 1 > J 2 JJ Srjuarree-r
1277
�o
�0 154
0
Accessory Structure Permit Total 20 18-202 1 Accessory Structure > 1200 Sq. Ft
CONTACT: Christopher Mason, Floodplain Coordinator
239-252-2932 Christopher.mason@colliercountyfl.gov