Agenda 12/14/2021 Item #17E (Resolution - Green Blvd Communications Tower)17.E
12/14/2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a
Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, providing for the
establishment of a conditional use to allow a communications tower within the Estates (E) Zoning
District pursuant to sections 2.03.0l.B.l.c.12 and 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land Development
Code for a 2.73f acre property located at 4111 Green Boulevard, also described as the east 180 feet
of Tract 125 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 26 subdivision, in Section 15, Township 49 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (CU-PL20190002859) [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, AICP,
Zoning Manager] (This is a companion to VA-PL20200000721)
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) review staff s findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)
regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and ensure the
project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's
interests are maintained. Per Policy 1.1.6 of the Urban Estates Sub Element of the Golden Gate Area
Master Plan adopted in the Growth Management Plan (GMP), to obtain Conditional Use approval, a super
majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the BZA is required for approval of this item.
CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is 2.73+ acres currently developed with a Fraternal Order of
Eagles meeting facility authorized by Provisional Use approval through Resolution 90-481, extended by
Resolution 92-050. The property is located at 4111 Green Boulevard, on the north side of the street,
approximately 680 feet west of the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Green Boulevard intersection, also
described as the east 180 feet of Tract 125 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 26 Subdivision. The
petitioner seeks a conditional use for a telecommunications tower as identified in LDC Section
2.03.0l.B.l.c.12, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09. The applicant proposes construction of a 147-foot
monopine tower with associated walled compound measuring 50 feet by 50 feet at the tower base to
accommodate equipment for T-Mobile, Verizon, and future users. A monopine tower is a tower designed
to look like a pine tree to help ameliorate the visual impact of the proposed tower. The tower is designed
to accommodate a total of four (4) colocations.
Given the shape of the parcel, the position of the tower does not meet all separation requirements
applicable to towers per LDC Section 5.05.09.G.7, and a companion variance application
(PL20200000721) seeks relief to allow the tower closer to the eastern and the western property lines than
the LDC requires.
The proposed tower is expected to generate minimal traffic, up to approximately 16 trips per month
depending on the on -going needs; as such there is not anticipated to be meaningful impact to the
surrounding area related to automotive or pedestrian traffic. Access to the tower will be off Green
Boulevard by an access easement across the existing driveway for the Fraternal Order of Eagles facility.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Conditional Use (CU) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier
County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of
development. However, if the CU is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new
development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects
identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the
adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building
Packet Pg. 2899
17.E
12/14/2021
permit certificate of occupancy or completion include site development and permit review and inspection
fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and
the CCPC to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject property is designated Estates in the Urban
Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map for the Golden Gate Area
Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub Element
states in section 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict, e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational
Criteria:
5. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no
smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a
Collector or Arterial.
The subject property meets the acreage criterion and is located on Green Boulevard, a major collector as
shown on Transportation Element Map TR 3.4 in the Growth Management Plan.
According to the information provided by the applicant the proposed Communication Tower facility will
generate a de minimis number of maintenance related trips monthly based on similar facilities in Florida.
Normally this can be +/-16 trips per month depending on the on -going needs. Therefore, the conditional
use is found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan.
Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal
Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 0.94 acres of native vegetation onsite. A
minimum of 0.09 acres (10%) of preserve is required; the preserve shall be placed under preservation and
dedicated to Collier County.
Based on the review above, this request can be found consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed conditional use.
Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the
overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any
conditional use petition. This petition may be deemed consistent with the GMP if the companion GMP
amendment is adopted and becomes effective.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC
heard Petition CU-PL20190002859 on November 4, 2021 and voted 5-0 to forward this petition to the
BZA with a recommendation of approval with the added condition that SBA Towers IX, LLC, its
successors, or assigns shall maintain the monopine tower (including, but not limited to, the tree branch
canopy) to ensure the appearance and condition remains in accordance with the depiction of the monopine
tower in Exhibit "A" (Sheet Z-3) of the attached resolution. The property owner along the western
boundary of the site expressed concerns and objection at the time of the Neighborhood Information
Meeting held on February 24, 2021, however no members of the public spoke on this item at the CCPC
hearing.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Before you is a recommendation by the CCPC for approval of a
Conditional Use authorizing a telecommunications tower within the Estates (E) zoning district. A
Conditional Use is a use that is permitted in a particular zoning district subject to certain restrictions. All
testimony given must be under oath. The attached report and recommendations of the CCPC are advisory
only and are not binding on you. The petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that the necessary
requirements have been met, and you may question the petitioner or staff, to satisfy yourself that the
necessary criteria has been satisfied. In addition to meeting the necessary criteria, you may place such
Packet Pg. 2900
12/14/2021
17.E
conditions and safeguards as you deem appropriate to allow the use, provided that there is competent,
substantial evidence that these additional conditions and safeguards are necessary to promote the public
health, safety, welfare, morals, order, comfort, convenience, appearance, or the general welfare of the
neighborhood. As a further condition of approval of the Conditional Use, you may require that suitable
areas for streets, public rights -of -way, schools, parks, and other public facilities be set aside, improved,
and/or dedicated for public use, subject to appropriate impact fee credits.
Approval or denial of the petition is by Resolution. This item has been approved as to form and legality,
and requires an affirmative vote of four members for BZA approval. -DDP
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals approves Petition CU-
PL20190002859, subject to the condition as recommended by the CCPC and incorporated in the
Resolution and subject to approval of the companion variance application (PL20200000721) for relief
from separation standards.
Prepared by: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution - 111021 (PDF)
2. 10-19-2021 - 4111 Green Blvd Tower-CU DDP Edit (PDF)
3. Attachment B.1 Res 90-481 Provisional Use (PDF)
4. Attachment B.2 Resolution 1992-050 Provisional Use extension (PDF)
5. Attachment C - RF Package 6NC 1081 G-081121-V 1.4 (PDF)
6. Attachment D - CU Backup Material
7. Attachment E - NIM Documentation (PDF)
8. Affidavit of Sign Posting (PDF)
9. legal ad - agenda IDs 20602 & 20608 (PDF)
Packet Pg. 2901
17.E
12/14/2021
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 17.E
Doe ID: 20602
Item Summary: Zoning Petition - CU-PL20190002859-4111 Green Blvd Tower CU, This item
requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by BZA members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all
participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution of the Board of
Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, providing for the establishment of a conditional use to allow a
communications tower within the Estates (E) Zoning District pursuant to sections 2.03.0l.B.l.c.12 and
5.05.09 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a 2.73f acre property located at 4111 Green
Boulevard, also described as the east 180 feet of Tract 125 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 26
subdivision, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (CU-
PL20190002859) [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager] (This is a companion to VA-
PL20200000721)
Meeting Date: 12/14/2021
Prepared by:
Title: — Zoning
Name: Laura DeJohn
11/12/2021 9:27 AM
Submitted by:
Title: — Zoning
Name: Mike Bosi
11/12/2021 9:27 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Zoning
Growth Management Department
Zoning
County Attorney's Office
Growth Management Department
Growth Management Department
Office of Management and Budget
County Attorney's Office
Office of Management and Budget
County Manager's Office
Board of County Commissioners
Mike Bosi
Zoning Director Review
Lissett DeLaRosa
Growth Management Department
Ray Bellows
Additional Reviewer
Derek D. Perry
Level 2 Attorney Review
Trinity Scott
Transportation
James C French
Growth Management
Debra Windsor
Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review
Laura Zautcke
Additional Reviewer
Amy Patterson
Level 4 County Manager Review
Geoffrey Willig
Meeting Pending
Completed
11/12/2021 9:49 AM
Completed
11/12/2021 12:45 PM
Completed
11/12/2021 3:26 PM
Completed
11/15/2021 10:12 AM
Skipped
11/15/2021 12:23 PM
Completed
11/17/2021 3:01 PM
Completed
11/17/2021 3:55 PM
Completed
11/18/2021 9:52 AM
Completed
11/19/2021 3:06 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 3:09 PM
12/14/2021 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 2902
17.E.1
RESOLUTION NO.2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A
COMMUNICATIONS TOWER WITHIN THE
ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 2.03.0l.B.l.c.12 AND 5.05.09 OF THE 3
0
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
FOR A 2.73f ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4111 m
GREEN BOULEVARD, ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE
EAST 180 FEET OF TRACT 125 OF GOLDEN GATE
ESTATES, UNIT NO.26 SUBDIVISION, IN SECTION
15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20190002859] en
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of
Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to
establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary
for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of
the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -
Element, Policy 1.1.6 requires Conditional Use approvals to receive a super majority vote
(minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals; and
WHEREAS, the existing provisional use PU-89-13 affecting the subject property,
granted by Resolution No. 90-481 and extended by Resolution No. 92-50, shall remain
undisturbed by this resolution granting a Conditional Use; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals ("Board"), being the duly appointed
and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing
after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability
of a Conditional Use to allow a communications tower within the Estates (E) Zoning
District pursuant to sections 2.03.0l.B.l.c.12 and 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land
Development Code on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County
Planning Commission has made findings that the granting of the Conditional Use will not
adversely affect the public interest and the specific requirements governing the
Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory provision and arrangement have
been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in
accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D of the Land Development Code; and
[20-CPS-01989/ 1670374/ 11 11 / 10/2021
4111 Green Blvd Communication Tower Page 1 of 2
CU-PL20190002859
Packet Pg. 2903
17.E.1
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters
presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
Petition Number PL20190002859 filed by Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. on behalf
of SBA Towers IX, LLC, with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit
"B", be and the same is hereby approved for a Conditional Use to allow a
communications tower within the Estates (E) Zoning District pursuant to sections
2.03.01.B.1.c.12 and 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land Development Code, in
accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit "A", and subject to the
conditions in Exhibit "C". Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes
of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and super majority vote of the
Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida this 14th day of December, 2021.
ATTEST:
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
am
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Derek D. Perry
Assistant County Attorney
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
am
Attachments: Exhibit "A" — Conceptual Site Plan
Exhibit `B" — Legal Description
Exhibit "C" — Conditions of Approval
Penny Taylor, Chairman
[20-CPS-01989/1670374/1] 11/10/2021
4111 Green Blvd Communication Tower Page 2 of 2 C
CU-PL20190002859
Packet Pg. 2904
EXHIBIT "A
c #
� / \
79
j
;2
rr;
\
)\\(\M
M
M-
�
>§
o
\k
/ \[
)\ /K
o fo§�§
,;§§§
) /\)�
'
k
�\
/)(m»:s,
�
;§�:��§
z
0
ci
§ @g
!
a.
§
4&
§
61
WwSiw=a
��q:u=;
>.
< _?
»�
--
[
k
\
_
qLU
�
e\\�=� .
a /\\
>: ..?w,- a,_m\S z. \� e:,
�
k
w
7
m
k
0
�
Cl)
§
CD
)
§
CL
�
0
CD
\
§
)
]
�
)
E
;
«
Page |f_3
Packet Pg. a«
,s
— -- --c PUBLIC ROWl.—
�i��
,H
§°
§
,
IS
«
Page 2 of 3
Packet Pg. am
S
6 0
3 4
3 4
Yo
�b�
bbb�
= wgo=
eR
oE�
d3E�
acc"".g�ae�e
011,
Z Z
as
ya#g p�m54= LU
j WH�MuzWiXO COw tM
z"o�gJg3 Ow W N
aa:3u 0 LU
3
F w
o a �
w 3 w
s z zs '\
3,.
LLI �Y i
I �II< mw o
LU
i w
LU
$ ` � �N
>3
-ri
M,
3o
N\oo
oLL
-
w
�Ww
wLL
3w
W asp
->.
o
ono
�n
w
�<
�w
'-
�o
�L
z
g
a
00,
rc'
o
ol
z'�pM
-
/
i�_
oN
�N
/
023
w3�
Z
g.,
a
aw
S
a €o
ao
o bz�wnms-
w�
f,. r
ago
b
°.Ol
I
_
Wx
U
3
O
m
c
d
'L^
V
a
Ln
CO
N
O
O
O
T
O
J
a
c
O
m
a
Cm
c
.E
N
N
Cl
O
O
04
r
c
O
_7
O
N
C
d
L
V
R
Q
Page 3 of 3
Packet Pg. 2907
EXHIBIT "B"
Legal Description
The East 180 Feet of Tract 125, Golden Gate Estates, Unit
No. 26, According to the Plat Thereof Recorded in Plat
Book 7, Pages 15 and 16, of the Public Records of Collier
County Florida.
Property Appraiser Parcel No. 37931280001
[20-CPS-01989/1670704/1] Page 1 of 1
Packet Pg. 2908
17.E.1
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
1. SBA Towers IX, LLC, its successors, or assigns shall maintain the
monopine tower (including, but not limited to, the tree branch canopy)
to ensure the appearance and condition remains in accordance with the
depiction of the monopine tower in Exhibit "A" (Sheet Z-3).
[20-cPs-01989/1680582/11 Page I of I
Packet Pg. 2909
17.E.2
Colter County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 2021
SUBJECT: PL20190002859; 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION
TOWER (CU) CONDITIONAL USE
(COMPANION TO VARIANCE PETITION VA-PL20200000721)
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner: Fraternal Order of Eagles #4028
4111 Green Blvd.
Naples, FL 34116
Applicant: SBA Towers IX, LLC
8051 Congress Ave
Boca Raton, FL 33487
REQUESTED ACTION:
Agent: Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq.
Mattaniah S. Jahn, P.A.
935 Main Street, Suite D1
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
Request to establish a conditional use to allow a communications tower within the Estates (E)
zoning district pursuant to Sections 2.03.0l.B.l.c.12 and 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land
Development Code for a +2.73 acre property occupied by the Fraternal Order of Eagles.
Per Policy 1.1.6 of the Urban Estates Sub Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan
adopted in the Growth Management Plan, to obtain conditional use approval, a super majority
vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject parcel is located at 4111 Green Boulevard, on the north side of the street,
approximately 680 feet west of the CR951/Green Boulevard intersection, also described as the
east 180 feet of Tract 125 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 26 Subdivision, in Section 15,
Township 49, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page)
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 1 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2910
e\
9
@f
mra9
§g
`
"
■
0
0
u
�
e
766
§ 17
§
! s
e
^
�
A
.
Lu
|�
®
.
§
�
«
!
f
W
\
�
�
� ■
-
ma_
�@
UNM
' a
'
oU
"I&
�
.
�
: n*,m ;
�
«wa mr
f
!
\
$
«w.0 mH,
-
-:
AS is rr
_
f
°
m»
CU RL ogmo 859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER
October ]$2y
CL
m
�
�
,C:
�
O
N
cr)
m
m
CINI
C)
a
a
m
CD
�
�
CL
E
Q
�
E
_
Z
E
�
7
�
CL
m
�
�
0
m
U
O
J
Page 2 of 11
Packet P$ 2911
17.E.2
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The petitioner seeks a conditional use for a telecommunications tower as identified in LDC
Section 2.03.01.B.l.c.12, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09. The applicant proposes construction
of a 147-foot' monopine tower with associated walled compound measuring 50 feet by 50 feet at
the tower base to accommodate equipment for T-Mobile and future users. A monopine tower is
a tower designed to look like a pine tree to help ameliorate the visual impact of the proposed
tower; see the applicant's elevation graphic on the following page. The tower is designed to
accommodate three additional future users for a total of four (4) colocations.
The parent parcel is a +2.73 acre site per Property Appraiser records. The site is developed with
a meeting facility for the Fraternal Order of Eagles #4028, including a 4,358-square foot building
and parking lot oriented toward Green Boulevard. The zoning designation of parcel is Estates,
with the Future Land Use designation of Urban Estates. The Fraternal Order of Eagles meeting
facility is authorized by Provisional Use approval through Resolution 90-481, extended by
Resolution 92-050 (see Attachment B).
The proposed tower location and access is upon disturbed or developed areas of the site. The
tower is design to collapse within a radius equal to 40 feet. The tower is not proposed to be
lighted as it is under the height required by the mosquito control district and the FAA for
lighting.
The proposed tower is expected to generate minimal traffic, up to approximately 16 trips per
month depending on the on -going needs; as such there is not anticipated to be meaningful impact
to the surrounding area related to automotive or pedestrian traffic. Access to the tower will be
off Green Boulevard by an access easement across the existing driveway for the Fraternal Order
of Eagles facility.
Given the shape of the parcel, the position of the tower does not meet all separation requirements
applicable to towers per LDC Section 5.05.09.G.7, and a companion variance application
(PL20200000721) seeks relief to allow the tower closer to the eastern and the western property
lines than the LDC requires.
'The applicant's original application for conditional use and variance was for a 150-foot tall tower, and the applicant
adjusted the requested tower height to 147 feet.
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 3 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2912
17. E.2
TOP OF LIOHTNIMO ROD jfj
TREE BRANCH CMOPY WIDTH O 152" AGL
AT TOP, TO It � or WIDE. TOP OF 70VCR AL
e 147' AGL
—S T_ uaal_I E .w?E-Nh As
�O 14e AAL (RAD OENTER)
FUTURE AWENNpSAL
133' k€Y (RAG CENTER)
_ FUTURE ANTENNAS
s 125' kX MAD CENTFR)
_ � FUTURE ANTEN1 -{�
$ 1 r-Y SGL fRAa O17�Tfi i 'T
PnKsER d' HIG+1
ARCRUTECrUPoN_LY
FINISHED > kcMRY
KALL,
own
TREE 13RAKH CMOPY WIDTH
AT SASE T4 BE ±29' WIDE.
PROPOSED 5BA $45' MONOPINE IMTF
BROWN TRUNK AND GREEN LENVES
TOWER ELEVATION
Sheet Z-3 from Applicant's Zoning Drawings Submittal
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 4 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2913
17.E.2
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties
surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is zoned Estates with Provisional Use
(now known as Conditional Use) approval for a fraternal organization clubhouse by Resolution
90-481 which was extended by Resolution 92-050:
North: 15th Avenue SW and FPL Substation zoned PUD
East: Office and commercial uses zoned Sungate Center CPUD
South: Green Boulevard and The Oaks Apartments zoned RMF-12, Multifamily
West: Single family home fronting 15th Avenue SW with garage structure fronting Green
Boulevard, zoned E, Estates
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Estates in the Urban
Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map for the Golden Gate
Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 5 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2914
17.E.2
Element states in section 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict, e. Special Exceptions to Conditional
Use Locational Criteria:
5. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on
parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the
Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial.
The subject property meets the acreage criterion and is located on Green Boulevard, a major
collector as shown on Transportation Element Map TR 3.4 in the Growth Management Plan.
Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation
Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states:
"The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation
applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible
development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation
system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a
deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent
roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which
significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently
operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard
within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also
approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement
reveals that any of the following occur:
a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is
equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume;
b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is
equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and
C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point
where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume.
Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant
and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant
impacts on all roadways."
According to the information provided by the applicant the proposed Communication Tower
facility will generate a de minimis number of maintenance related trips monthly based on similar
facilities in Florida. Normally this can be +/-16 trips per month depending on the on -going
needs. Therefore, the conditional use is found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation
Element of the Growth Management Plan.
Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has
found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element
(CCME). The project site consists of 0.94 acres of native vegetation onsite. A minimum of 0.09
acres (10%) of preserve is required; the preserve shall be placed under preservation and
dedicated to Collier County.
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 6 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2915
17.E.2
Based on the review above, this request can be found consistent with the Growth Management
Plan.
Federal Law
It should be noted that Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act, prohibits environmental
concerns (or health concerns) as a reason for denial of cell towers by a local jurisdiction. If the
County recommends denial of the petition, it should not be based on health affect, but rather one
of the five below areas of analysis for conditional uses.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria
upon which a recommendation must be based. This evaluation is completed as part of the
Zoning and Land Development Review provided below. In addition, staff offers the following
analyses:
Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition request and is
recommending approval.
Landscape Review: The LDC required buffer area is depicted on the overall site plan. Detailed
landscape plans are provided and reviewed at time of SDP.
Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the conditional use petition
to address environmental concerns. The preserve requirement is 0.09 acres (10% of 0.9 acres).
The Conceptual Site Plan provides a total of 0.09 acres preserve, which meets the minimum 10
percent native preservation requirement in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. No listed
animal species were observed on the property; however, the site does contain potential habitat
for listed species. The proposed project is located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) consultation area for Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus). Two tree cavities were observed
onsite; however, no evidence was found indicating the trees onsite were being utilized.
Conditional Use Findings: Before any conditional use recommendation can be offered to the
Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make
findings that: 1) approval of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public; and 2) all
specific requirements for the individual conditional use will be met; and 3) satisfactory
provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable:
1. Section 2.03.0l.B.l.c.12 of the LDC permits communication towers as conditional uses
up to specified heights in the Estates zoning district, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09.
The requested use for a telecommunications tower is allowed as a conditional use in the
Estates zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in Sections
10.08.00, conditional uses procedures, and 5.05.09, communication towers, of the LDC.
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 7 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2916
17.E.2
2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management
Plan (GMP).
Staff has found this request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The
development of conditional uses shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the
Land Development Code (LDC), with the exception that a companion variance petition
(PL20200000721) is requested to provide for relief from the separation requirements from
property immediately to the west and east of the subject site.
Communication towers in the Estates zoning district are also subject to specific criteria of
Section 5.05.09.G.25 listed below with explanations from staff in italics:
a. The parcel is a minimum 2.25 acres and adjacent to an arterial or collector road.
The parcel meets this criterion.
b. The communications provider has provided evidence that the communication provider's
search radius for tower placement requires placement of the tower in the Estates Zoning
District to meet its coverage requirements and the tower cannot be co -located on an
existing tower and provide the same service coverage.
Per LDC Section 5.05.09.B.2, the effective radius for tower placement is defined as "a
radius of 6 miles from the respective tower unless a lesser radius is approved. " Per LDC
5.O5.09.B.3, a lesser effective radius means an approved radius of less than 6 miles.
In seeking approval for a lesser effective radius, LDC Section 5.05.09.D.2 provides that:
[TJhe applicant shall provide evidence that the asserted lesser effective
radius is based on physical and/or electrical characteristics. Based on the
evidence submitted by the applicant, the County Manager or designee may
establish a lesser effective radius. If a radius can be increased by signal
amplification or other means, such means must be considered in
determining the lesser effective radius. The antenna manufacturer's
specifications shall be conclusive, unless the applicant can prove they are
incorrect in the specific case.
See Attachment C for the applicant's submittal identifying a search radius to the north of
the site with their explanation for the need to place the tower in the Estates Zoning
District to meet the service provider's goals. The applicant asserts that the network
nature of cellular coverage limits the area where the monopine can be located and still
achieve T-Mobile's RF objectives to solve its significant gap in coverage.
The applicant states, "There were no towers or structures of sufficient [sic] height within
the T-Mobile search area that could accommodate the addition of new facility that would
provide an adequate coverage improvement. " The applicant declares that two other
towers are existing in the area to the south of the site, and these "Locations outside of the
search area would not provide the coverage improvements and capacity relief in order to
meet service goals. "
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 8 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2917
17.E.2
c. All security and site lighting shall be less than 20 feet above grade, fully shielded, and
directed away from neighboring properties.
Final lighting plans are reviewed against this standard at time of site development plan
permitting.
d. Fencing height and landscaping. The required perimeter wall or fence height shall be a
minimum of eight feet from finished grade of base supporting structure and no greater
than 10 feet. A minimum 15 feet landscape Type B buffer along the perimeter of wall or
fence is required and tree plantings within the buffer shall be 12 feet tall at time of
planting.
The Overall Site Plan submitted with this application (Sheet Z-2 of applicant's Zoning
Drawings submittal) indicates an 8-foot high architecturally finished masonry wall is
proposed around the compound. Final fencing and landscaping plans are reviewed
against this standard at time of site development plan permitting.
e. Equipment cabinets. Overall height of ground -mounted equipment or equipment enclosure
shall not exceed 12 feet.
Dimensions of the equipment cabinets are reviewed against this standard at time of site
development plan and building permitting.
3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
Ingress and egress to the proposed tower is by access easement on the western edge of the
parent parcel across the existing drive aisle for the Fraternal Order of Eagles facility off
Green Boulevard. The 50' x 50' compound at the base of the tower is proposed to have gates
for security. Parking spaces for maintenance vehicles will be within the fenced area, subject
to site development plan review and permitting.
4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to
noise, glare, economic or odor effects.
The tower is not anticipated to create noise, odor, or glare. The tower is not proposed to be
illuminated, and the design of the tower is proposed as a monopine to ameliorate the visual
impact upon the surrounding properties. The tower is anticipated to improve wireless
communication capacity and service levels in the area, which not only positively affect
economic opportunities, but also increase safety within the area with improved coverage and
call stability for emergency situations.
5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district.
The projected 40-foot fall zone radius for the tower is within the boundaries of the parent
parcel. A tower will generate far fewer trips than other uses that are permitted or conditional
in the Estates zoning district. The applicant has attempted to ameliorate the visual impact of
the tower by proposing a monopine type of tower. The applicant provided several photo
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 9 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2918
17.E.2
simulation images to portray the appearance of the tower from different vantage points. One
view is below from 15th Avenue SW looking south.
SBA
EXISTING VIEW
PROPOSED VIEW
Kimley�)Horn
While the proposed tower location meets separation standards from the FPL substation and
residential property to the north, and from residential property to the south across Green
Boulevard, it does not meet the separation standards to the east and west, thus the applicant
submitted a companion variance petition (PL20200000721).
The separation standards are established in the LDC to address compatibility with nonresidential
and residential properties in proximity to a proposed tower. Because the applicant seeks relief to
provide less than the required separation, a recommendation of approval for the conditional use
must be subject to approval of the variance petition to allow the proximity of the tower to the
adjoining sites.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC):
This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did
not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of
the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends
approval of the petition.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The NIM was held on February 24, 2021 at Springhill Suites by Marriott, 3798 White Lake
Blvd., Naples, FL 34117. The agent for the conditional use and variance applications described
the location of the tower, the monopine stealth design, the walled compound with landscaping
and the primary entrance off Green Boulevard.
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 10 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2919
17.E.2
The NIM was attended by two individuals, a mother and a daughter who live on 15th Avenue SW
adjacent to the subject property. The primary objection to the tower was based upon the health
effects from having their house in close proximity to a tower. No additional commitments were
made by the applicant. A NIM summary transcript is included in Attachment D.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed this staff report on October 18, 2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) recommend approval
of Petition CU-20190002859, Green Boulevard Tower, to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA),
only upon a determination of approval for the companion variance application (PL20200000721)
for relief from separation standards.
Attachments:
A. Resolution
B. Provisional Use Resolution 90-481 and extension Resolution 92-050
C. Radio Frequency (RF) Engineering Report by T-Mobile Engineering & Operations
D. Applicant's Backup Material
E. Neighborhood Information Meeting documentation
CU-PL20190002859 4111 GREEN BOULEVARD COMMUNICATION TOWER Page 11 of 11
October 19, 2021
Packet Pg. 2920
RESOLUTION 9 48 1 17.E.3
ocnBER 9, 1990
RELATING TO PETITION 110. U-89-13 FOR PROVISIONAL
USE OF PROPERTY HF.P.EI11AFT ;R DESCRIBED IN COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WIIERF.AS, the Legislature of the State of: Florida in Chaptir
67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapt:r 125, Florida Statutes, h,s
conferred on Collier County the pow x to establish, coordinate
and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are
necessary/ for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for th!
zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Provisional Uses; and
WHE-REAS, the Collier County P1 nning Commission, being the
duly appointed and constituted planing board for the area
hereby affected, has held a public '.eari.ng after notice ac, in
said reg'ilations made and provided, and has considered the
advisability of Provisional Use "d" in an "E" Estates zone for
a frater:ial organization clubhouse on the property hereinafter
described, and upon review of said petition in accordance_ with
Section t3.1.d of the Zoning Regula'ions for the Collier Count!
Planning Commission, forwarded its ecommendation to the Board
of Zonin(? Appeals; and
WHF.2F,AS, all interested pantie have been given opportunity
to be he,ird by this Board in a public meeting assamhled and the
Board ha -ring considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS )f Collier County, Flor:_da hat the petition of Donald
A. Pickworth of Asbell, Hains, Doyl & Pickworth, P.A.,
represen':ing The Fraternal Order of Eagles 14028, with respect
to the property hereinafter descrik:r d as:
The east 180 feet of Tract 125 Golden Gate Esta':es, Unit
26, as recorded in Plat Book 7 Page 15 of the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to easements,
res':rictions and reservations of record.
MAO J:4
-.1-
Packet Pg. 2921
OCTOPER 9, 1990
be and t:ie same is hereby approved `or Provisional Use "d" of
17. E.3
the "E" Estates zoning district foi a fraterral organization
clubhous>_ subject to the following conditions:
a. The northern portion of the property shall nct be
developed: this port:ior is defined as the entire 180
foot width of the property, and from the 15th Ave. S.W.
property line south 202 `eet. Greenbrier and muscadine
grape shall be removed f-om all native trees within this
area in an effort to enhance the health of the remaining
habitat. This area may be used for passive recreation or
dry retention.
b. The developer shall be subject to County Ordinance No.
75-21 as amended by Ordinance 89-58 (preservation of
native habitat).
C. The developer shall be subject to County Ordinance No.
82-37 as anended by Ordinance 89-53 (removal of exotic
species).
d. The developer shall be ;ubject to County Ordinance No.
89-57 (use of native spec .es in landscaping).
e. Detailed paving, grading ind site drainage plans shall be
submitted to Project: R view Services for review. No
construction permits shal-1 be issued unless and until
approval of the proposed construction in accordance with
the f;utnitted plans i-; granted by Project Review
services.
f. Design and construction of all improvements shai'. be
subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of
the Collier County Subdivision Regulations.
g. Work within Collier County right-of-way shall meet the
requirements of Collier County right-of-way Ordinance
82-91.
h. The developer shall pro,, de a detailed water manag:ment
plan and supporting calcIlations, signed and sealed by a
professional engineer at the time of submission o: the
preliminary site develops nt plan.
i. The developer shall provi.::e a boundary survey, signed and
sealed by a professional surveyor at the time of
submission of the preliminary site development plan.
j. The developer shall pr)vide typical cross-sectioi.s of
retention areas and indic to the seasonal water tabl s in
relation to the bottom of the ponds at the tiic of
submission of the preli.ni ary site development plan.
k. Connection to water and sewer facilities within Green
Blvd. right-of-way, if av-.ilable, is required and mu::t be
completely illustrated c,, the site plan .and supporting
engineerin�t construction drawings, if required, -s to
location, configuration a d size.
1. If central water and sewer facilities are not available,
a septic system and a potable water well are to be iised.
The developf>_r shall illustrate the loc.a., ion,
configuration and size of the septic system an(' its
l:l 45
Packet Pg. 2922
I 17.E.3 M,
OCTOBER 9, 1990
relationship to thr! water supply well on the final site
development plan and suplorting engineering construction
drawings.
m. Access driveways shall ii.clude turn lane improvements or
turning radius of a minimum 50 feet.
n. Collier County retains median access control and
entrance/exit movenents are subject to right turn in,
right turn out control.
o. Arterial level street ligiting is required at the project
access point(s) with Greei Boulevard.
p. Access improvements are considered "site related" as
outlined in Ordinance 85-55 and shall not be applied as
credits toward any impact fees required by the Ordinance.
Payment of Impact Fees shall. be in accordance with the
applicable fee schedule it said Ordinance.
q. The developer shall submit this project for a permi, and
comply with FAC 1OD-5 pr,.or to a permit being issued by
the Collier County Public Health Unit.
r. The developer must provide some type of provisioi, for
water supply for fire suppression on -site. Possible
alternatives include the following: installation of a
well with a pump, an o,-site storage tank, a dra.'ting
well, or a fire sprinkler system. Such provision mint be
provided at the time of., or prior to, preliminary site
development plan application.
S. Depending on how the building is constructed, it may be
required to be sprinkler:d, to have a fire alarm system
instz, lied, and the in;tallation of four hour wall
separations.
t. Driveways and parking lots shall not be constructed to
impede emergency vehicle access or travel.
U. The banquet facilities w 11 be required to have a hood
system with a suppression system in the kitchen.
V. Emergency lighting (subj-ct to the approval of the fire
department) shall be ir.•luded in all areas due t, the
1:00 A.M. closing time or. Saturdays.
W. Existing native vegetati n may be utilized in providing
the landscape buffering. Access shall be from Green
Boulevard onlv. No access shall be permitted from 15th
Avenue S.W. Also, parking/security lights shall be
located so as to prevent glare upon neighboring
properties.
X. Seating for the banquet acilities and the lounge :hall
comply with applicable standards a:: required by the
Florida Department of He.lth and Rehabilitative Ser,ices
(HRS) and the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation (DER) for wast--water- treatment and disposal.
Y. This project shall comely with Section 8.11 o` the
Collier County Zoning Ordnance (Locational Restrictions
for Uses Involving Intoxi.ating Beverages).
Z. The banquet facilities aid the lounge ;hall only be used
by the members of Fraternal Order of Eagles #4023 and
their guests. No commercial uses shall be permittF_d,
N. Oct 46
Packet Pg. 2923
OCTOBER 9. 1990
aa. The developer shall subm.t a site plan for preliminary
and final ,ite develo,ment plan approval prior to
applying for a building p rmit.
bb. No outdoor functions shal. be allowed after sunset.
CC. An opaque fence shall be constructed to rur, along the
entire westerly boundary of the subject property (from
Green Boulevard to 15th Avenue Southwest).
dd. Landscaped buffering shill be maximized between the
building and the parking area (the developed porti)n of
the property) and the w sterly boundary of ;:he subject
property. The maximum 1,,nd caped buffering permitted by
the Collier County Zoning Ordinance shall be utilized.
ee. The hours of operation .or the fraternal organization
clubhouse shall be limited as follows:
Sunday thro»gh_Thursday: 10 A.M. to 11 P.N. (Sale and/or
distribution of alcoholic beverages shall cease a: to
P.M.).
-FXid1a-yj 10 A.M. to 12 Midnight (Sale and/or distrib ition
of alcoholic beverages shall cease at 12 Midnight).
Saturda= 10 A.M. to 1 A M. (Sale and/or distribution of
alcoholic beverages shall cease at 12 Midnight).
ff. Approval of this petition is contingent upon the ten (10)
acre parcel adjacent to i�ne east of the subject property
finally being designated as a commercial location within
the Golden Gate Master Plan. The one year time period
required for the Provisi nal Use to commence shall not
begin until the final adoption date that will impl-ment
the Golden Gate Master Plan. Furthermore, the app oval
granted for Petition PU-83-13 shall become void i. the
ten (10) acre parcel adjacent to the east of the sul-ject
property is not designated as a commercial location
within the Golden Gate Mas':er Plan.
gg Parking lot lighting sha'l hn minimized. Bulbs shall be
shielded and pointing dow—
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that th s Resolution be recorded i;
the minutes of this Board.
Commissioner 'Volpe offered the
foregoing Resolution and moved for "ts adoption, seconded by
Commis:s-one_r Shanahan and upon roll call, the vote
was:
AYES: Commissioner Vclpe, Cor-rmissioier Shanahan, Com:rlissioner :aund
Commmissioner Goodnight, and Ci r n.issioner Hasse
NAYS:
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTF.NT'.011:
F71 PCO 47
-4-
Dome this 9th day of
ATTEST:. !?
, IZS C. GILF.S CLERK
OCTOBER 9, 1.990
October _ 1990.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Cc LLIER COMITY, FLORIDA
W
hIA . A. HASSE, J P. , CHAIP API
A�PP. VEIL AS TO FOP.M AND LEGAL SUFFI!'IEiICY:
MARJOR ]: M. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
PU-89-13 RESOLUTION
nb/2169
-5-
48
17. E.4
RESOLUTION 92-_Q
RELATING TO PETITION NO. PU-89-13 FOR EXTENSION
OF CONDITIONAL USE OF PROPERTY HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter
125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all Counties in Florida the
power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business
regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes
comprehensive zoning regulations for the zoning of particular
divisions of the County, among which is the granting and extending
the time period of Conditional Uses formerly known as Provisional
Uses; and
WHEREAS, on October 9, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners
enacted Resolution No. 90-481, which granted a provisional use now
known as a conditional use pursuant to Ordinance No. 91-102, for a
fraternal organization clubhouse, on the below described property;
and
WHEREAS, Subsection 2.7.4.5 of the Land Development Code
provides that the -Board of Zoning Appeals may extend the one (1)
year time period for a conditional use which has not been
commenced;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning Appeals
of Collier County, Florida that the written request of Tom Henning
and Steve Ritter representing The Fraternal Order Of Eagles 14028
for the first of three (3) permitted one (1) year extensions, in
interest of the following described property:
The east 180 feet of Tract 125, Golden Gate
Estates, Unit 26, as recorded in Plat Book
7, Page 15 of the Public Records of Collier
County, Florida. Subject to easements,
restrictions and reservations of record.
U
L
3
0
m
c
m
a�
L
0
T
CD
LO
co
N
O
0
0
M
0
N
J
a
c
0
r
a
a�
c
0
N
N
0
c,fl
0
N
c
0
N
c
a�
x
m
m
M
c
0
.y
0
a
0
L0
T
N
c
w
0
0
M
N
m
T
c
a�
E
s
r
a
r
c
E
r
2
Packet Pg. 2926
is hereby approved pursuant to Subsection 2.7.4.5, of the Land
17. E.4
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) and the expiration date for
Resolution No. 90-481, attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit "A", and all conditions applicable thereto is extended
hereby for one year until February 5, 1993.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the
minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for which
the extension is granted.
Commissioner Hasse offered the foregoing
Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner
Shanahan , and upon roll call, the vote was:
AYES: Comnissiwer Hasse, Coaadssioner Shanahan, Ccanissioner Smiders, and
Cmmissioner Volpe
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTENTION:
Done this 28th
ATTEST
JAKE3 c. GILE&�.,CLERK
day of J== y , 1992.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUIRY, FLORIDA
BY: -0-1)
CHAIRMAN
AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
U
L
3
0
LO
m
c
as
a�
L
c�
aO
00
fV
O
O
0
Cn
0
N
J
a.
c
0
m
0-
cm
c
E
0
N
N
O
0
N
c
0
c
a�
X
d
W
7a
c
0
A
0
a.
0
0
N
Cn
Cn
c
0
0
m
N
m
T
C
a�
E
U
fC
r
Q
C
d
E
t
U
r•+
PU-89-13 EXTENSION RESOLUTION
nb/7126
0am'.
Q
Packet Pg. 2927
T - •Mobile -
Engineering
& operations
17.E.5
6NC1081G
SBA— Naples-6
Wireless Telecommunication
Facility
Radio Frequency (RF) Engineering Report
Last Updated 108/11/21
IRevision Number I V1.4
Packet Pg. 2928
RF Engineering Review 17F�
Table of Contents
5
3
SearchRing Area....................................................................................................................................................................................
O
m
Current Cell Site Coverage and Predicted Improvements.....................................................................................................................
r_
m
/L^
V
Certification Statement of Non-interference........................................................................................................................................
r
r
Appendix A: Radio Frequency Engineering Review of Alternate Candidate Locations.........................................................................
00
O
O
O
O
r
O
N
J
d
N
d
of
C
O
N
N
O
t0
O
N
r
N
O
O
O
O
U
Z
m
d
cv
Y
V
d
LL
U
c
m
E
t
v
r
r
Q
c
a�
E
t
v
c�
Q
Page 2
8/11 /2021
Packet Pg. 2929
RF Engineering Review 17F�
Search Ring Area
As part of T-Mobile's commitment tc U
improve service in the south Florida market a
number of "search rings" have been issued to 0
address coverage deficiencies in the cellular
~
network. Each search ring is in an area where
m
service levels are inadequate to provide the
c
necessary cell phone coverage or capacity.
m
Within the search ring existing towers or
r
structures of sufficient height are sought with
TZ
the goal of deploying radio transceivers and
antennas to improve the local area service
00
levels.
N
O
0
Due to the dramatic increase in cell
0
phone traffic and the popularity of wireless
r
N
data applications over the last few years,
J
a
significant demands have been placed on
c
network coverage and capacity. One such are.
0
1 26'1030.58"N, 81'43.4.54 in need of improved services is in the area of a
„es Golden Gate from approximately Vanderbilt
�,� , 53.880 Fi ure 1: Search Area Beach Rd in the north to Green Blvd in the
0
south and from Logan Blvd in the west to 25th St in the east. Coverage levels are too low to support the capacity and coverage needs for this part of th, N
network. Users placing calls indoors and especially during network busy hours may experience dropped calls, ineffective network attempts and slow dz c
application speeds. In the worst -case a user may not be able to place a E911 call. There were no towers or structures of suffcient height within the T-M o
N
search area that could accommodate the addition of new facility that would provide an adequate coverage improvement. The surrounding facilities hi "
lzt
undergone extensive upgrades over the last decade with no appreciable improvement in service levels in the area of concern. r
Shown above in Figure 1 is the T-Mobile search ring and the proposed location surrounded by existing T-Mobile cellular facilities ("cell sites").
N
that there are two other existing structures in the Golden Gates area. (yellow circles indicated on map, 26°10'30.53"N, 81°43'4.54"W and 26°10'53.76"
00
81°41'39.78"W.) Both of these locations are outside of the T-Mobile search area indicated by the blue polygon in figure one. Locations outside of the sE o 1
area would not provide the coverage improvements and capacity relief in order to meet service goals.
r
O
O
U
Table 1: Existing T-Mobile Locations W
• JW
6NC1019A
W
CORONADO FIRE STATION
Flag Pole
I
NE CORNER OF CORONADA PARKWAY & GOLDEN GATE PK
Naples
Antenna
Elevation
127
Structure
130
Distance
1.54
6NC1022C
PALM RIVER ACME
Monopole
6231 ARBOR BLVD
Naples
143
150
4.1
6NC1029A
1- GOLDEN GATE FIRE STATION
Self Support Tower
100 SW 13 ST. NW
Naples
135
165
4.05
6NC1052A
Nextel Golden Gate North
Monopole
1010 WHIPPORWILL LANE
Naples
120
170
3.37
6NC1076A
CINGULAR951YUREWITCH
Monopole
14785 Collier Blvd
Naples
110
150
3.97
6NC1102M
SFL900 - 3 310 - sprint Flagpole
Flag Pole
11935 Collier Blvd
Naples 1
126
1 150
1 0.85
Page 3
8/11 /2021
d
a�
cv
Y
V
LL
U
C
d
t
v
R
r
r
Q
C
N
E
t
v
cC
Q
Packet Pg. 2930
RF Engineering Review 17F�
Current Cell Site Coverage and Predicted Improvements
Good (reliable indoor service)
Average (reliable outdoor service)
below average (poor service)
Users may experience call quality issues depending on the
A user would encounter call quality issues especially indoors
Signal power levels able to support a wide range of wireless
signal power levels at their specific location. These issues
or during network busy hours due to low signal power
services both indoors and outdoors. These services include
could include dropped calls, ineffective attempts (blocked
levels. These issues could include dropped calls, ineffective
voice calls and high-speed data.
calls) or slow data speeds. Service in outdoor locations
attempts (blocked calls) and slow data speeds. Service may
would be markedly better than indoors in many instances.
only be available in outdoor locations. In the worst case a
user may not be able to place an emergency (E911) call.
Existing Coverage
goad
0 - Existing T-Mobile Site
average
- Proposed Facility
poor
0 - existing tower
,a
P
Pine Ridge Rd
,a
m
a
Ob
U
v
a Green Blvd
- a
z
Naples 6 (6NC1081G)
N
0.
� � I
�
n
o
a
m
q'01 a
e
ova(,de
26'10 3.76"N, 81'41'39.7
26'10'30.53"N,
81'43'4.54
0
V �
05
J
1 F
miles
a6lbiliFi ure 2
Page 4
As part of T-Mobile's design and
development process a number of engineering
studies are completed to ensure a best -fit
approach for cell site additions in the network.
Propagation or prediction plots are one of the
most important of these and are used
extensively to determine if a new proposal is
adequate.
In Figure 2 the cell site propagation is shown
as shades of color which represent signal
power levels that a user would experience at
a particular location. The propagation model
is based on a predictive computer simulator
application that is derived from proprietary
methodologies. Green areas indicate signal
power levels able to support a wide range of
wireless services both indoors and outdoors.
These services include voice calls and high-
speed data. The yellow color indicates areas
where a user may experience call quality
issues due to inconsistent signal power
levels. This may depend on their specific
location. For instance, a person may be able
to use the cell phone on one side of their
house near a window but unable to connect
in another part of the house. The red areas
represent where a user would encounter call
quality issues due to low or unusable signal
power levels. This would be especially true
indoors or during network busy hours. These
issues could include dropped calls, ineffective
attempts and slow data speeds. In the worst
case a user may not be able to place an
emergency (E911) call.
8/11 /2021
It
Packet Pg. 2931
RF Engineering Review 17F�
Predicted Coverage with New Facility
O Existing T-Mobile Site
=r
It
- Proposed Facility
average -
, {_
O
poor
;, P,• —r
- existing tower
'fir•
—
Ine Ridge - {,
dr 11
•
,fix
j
Green Blvd•
Naples 6 16NC9081G)
ems. { i
a
v
a
a
e .ti
r�'ti
L
•
d
Q�
� N
6
26"10 5376"N, 81"41'39.7
26'10'30.53"N, 81°43'4.54
___(D
0 05
-�
i-
miles
Fi ure 3
Page 5
The propagation map shown in Figure 3
depicts the predicted signal power levels for the
proposed tower when added to the existing
D
network. As can be seen almost all the residential
U
areas have a minimum of average service levels.
3
This is especially important for users who are
0
transitioning from one geographic area to another
-0
due to a more consistent coverage overlay. Users
pp
indoors will also benefit tremendously due to the
closer proximity to the antenna locations. Areas
m
where below average signal power levels still exist
can sometimes be alleviated through network
r
optimization methods after the new site comes on
line. (These processes are iterative and require a
LO
more medium to long term engineering approach)
N
In summary, T-Mobile has recognized the
c
demand for advanced telecommunication services
CD
in these communities. The existing T-Mobile
N
facilities cannot provide these services through
a
upgrade or expansion, due to the distances from
'
the existing tower facilities and cell phone users in
o
this area. Further, no towers or structures of
sufficient height were identified in the search ring
ii
that could provide the necessary improvements to
the network coverage.
O
These propagation maps graphically
N
demonstrate T-Mobile's business needs based
N
upon existing and predicted customer demands. T-
O
c
Mobile's goal is to provide reliable wireless service
in the areas shown as defined by proprietary QOS
It
(Quality of Service) design parameters.
N
O
O
O
O
U
Z
W
d
cv
Y
V
d
LL
W
8/11 /2021
U
r
c
m
E
t
v
r
r
Q
c
Iv
E
t
rJ
crs
Q
Packet Pg. 2932
RF Engineering Review 17F�
Certification Statement of Non-interference
This letter provides information about the proposed T-Mobile transceiving equipment on the proposed facility in Naples, FL and its potential
interference with communication facilities located nearby; as well as the FCC rules governing the human exposure to radio frequency energy (OET 65
guidelines). T-Mobile shall comply with all FCC rules regarding interference to other radio services and T-Mobile shall comply with all FCC rules regardi
human exposure to radio frequency energy. The proposed tower facilities, and reception and transmission functions will not interfere with the visual a
customary transmission or reception of radio, television or similar services as well as other wireless services enjoyed by surrounding properties.
T-Mobile radio signals are transmitted on exclusively assigned channels within the E, F and C bands in the PCS spectrum and the D, E, F1 and I
the AWS spectrum and A Band in 700MHz. In the future AWS-3 Block H and B, C and D blocks in 600 MHz will be active. The Federal Communication
Commission (FCC) has allocated these frequencies exclusively for use by cellular service providers. Each cellular service provider is assigned specific
frequencies (channels) on which to transmit and receive radio signals.
Cellular transmitters must be type -accepted by the FCC to ensure compliance with technical standards that limit the frequencies, output pow
radio frequency emissions, spurious radio noise and other technical parameters. Cellular licensees like T-Mobile owns are required to use type-accepte
equipment. The assignment of frequencies and FCC rules keep cellular radio signals from interfering with or being interfered with by other radio
transmissions and provide guidelines outlining the limits for permissible human RF exposure. In the event of a complaint of interference or other conc
about cellular antenna facilities, the FCC has a resolution process to determine the source of interference and whether a facility is in compliance with F
rules.
In the event of interference or other known issues with the transmission facility contact with the T-Mobile Network Operations Center (NOC)
established 24 hours a day, 7 days a week 365/366 days per year at the following numbers: (877) 611-5868 (DAY), (877) 611-5868 (NIGHT)
Name Patrick Keane
(OAL
Signature
Title T-Mobile Sr Engineer, Radio Frequency
Page 6
8/11 /2021
Packet Pg. 2933
RF Engineering Review 17F�
Appendix A: Radio Frequency Engineering Review of Alternate Candidate Locations
The proposed new tower was funded to
improve the signal coverage levels and also to provide
an offload of the existing towers' cellular "traffic load".
The two facilities within the community provide
coverage for all of Golden Gate. (A site or facility is the
location of T-Mobile equipment including a base -
station and antennas, usually on a tower or rooftop)
The north facing antenna arrays (or sectors) for each of
these sites are currently carrying more cellular traffic
(or usage) than the network can support. Devices
connected to that facility would experience
performance degradation that may include inability to
access services, interference, slow speeds and dropped
connections. New call attempts may not be connected.
During the development process additional
candidate properties were analyzed for feasibility.
Based on T-Mobile's service goals neither of these
locations would fit the network requirements network.
They are too far north to offer significant cellular traffic
offload or coverage in areas of most need.
Local Area with Alternate
Candidates
13015 Caeiar BlW_Naplaa
FL 3111E
Id eltd 31 CallierB NePleq
Ft 36116
3M
S =
e1e
,e 6F1.9 P
Ct0,9F1'%
�
I
Fi ure A
A map displaying the proposed tower and the two alternate location are
shown in figure A. Population and call traffic geo-locates are superimposed on this map
in Figure B. (geo-locate in this sense meaning cellular connections that have been
mapped) In the three subsequent maps (figures C/D/E), a 4 sq mile grid boundary has
been overlaid on the tower and the Colllier Blvd addresses 13131 and 13415
respectively. This boundary represents where a tower would serve or have influence on
the cellular device users in that area.
The impact on network service by the proposed tower is significantly greater
than either of the two alternate locations. The percentage difference in both
population covered and the amount of call traffic that might be carried are listed in
Table A.
45 Mi Grid Prc usedT—
q.a 3415 Cal BMd Nepbs, FL 31119.. .- �.
11- Calder BiNd. Mau Ys. FL 34116
8NC1051
B 959• 4:
1 ENclloanl
4 ee3Q6Q` 41 BQ Y
5 n9 d
PNC101 _
Fi ure C
Page 7
-
V`alPopulation
and Call Counts
.
0
?.
13415 Calller BNd. Neplee, FL 34119. :y
LO
00
Table A
Totals within 4Sq Mile
buf
Population
Population
Difference
Call
Diffe
(30 c
Naples-6
11345
209%
47
13131 Collier
3666
Naples-6
11345
364%
63
13415 Collier
2447
4 Sq Mi Grid 13415 Collier
Blvd
A:
-
ah
13g15 L9re•Blvd Nepba, FE
Y•119 � �
I
. 16131 caner ene. uealee. r>_ a+115
1L
77
n
! Fsa
9Gq A
X.
0 $,,
®
Fi ure E
8/11 /2021
0 —
a
r-
Fic
N e
.. 1
N —
0
co
0
N
�J
T
N
0
O
0
O_
V
Z
to
a)
Im
cc
V
cc
IL
U.
cc
d
t
rt�+
C
C9
Q
Packet Pg. 2934
RF Engineering Review 17F�
Potential Candidate Collier County Park: Max A. Hasse Community Park
Another potential tower location has been identified and
rejected as a workable candidate. Although a facility in Max A.
Hasse Community Park would improve the local area service it is too
far north of the primary objective. In a way similar to the two
candidate properties presented in the previous section, a facility
here would not offer significant cellular traffic offload or coverage in
areas of most need.
In summary, there are areas defined with both inadequate
cellular signal levels and more importantly with high cellular call and
data traffic. The Naples 6 (T-Mobile ID 6NC1081G) tower is an ideal
location for mitigating the current network performance issues. The
other three reviewed would not provide adequate relief.
Property Address
distance mi
Collier / Pine Ridge 13131 Collier Blvd, Naples, FL 34116
0.92
possible tower location 13415 Collier Blvd, Naples, FL 34119
1.43
Page 8
8/11 /2021
It
Packet Pg. 2935
17.E.7
NIM — 2-24-21— Summary of Recording
Mattaniah Jahn: Hello Ms. Aleman, Hi, I cannot hear you but I am Mattaniah Jahn. I'm afraid I
still cannot hear you.
Ms. Aleman: I'm on. Can you hear me now?
L
Ms. Jahn: Yes, I can.
0
Ms. Aleman: Okay
co
Ms. Jahn: Okay, so we are at 5:34, 1 was going to just give it just a few more minutes to see if
a�
anyone else wants to join, if that's okay with you because you are my only attendee. So, I just
wanted to give people who may be stuck in traffic 5 more minutes.
Ms. Aleman: Okay
N
Ms. Jahn: How is your evening going?
0
CD
Ms. Aleman: I don't see no screen here are they not sharing the screen? (Someone beside her says,
0
Cq
"Once they start ........ muted ... miscellaneous talking between others with her.
a
Ms. Jahn: This is Mattaniah Jahn. Let me get my camera on here.
c
Ms. Aleman: Hi
as
a
Ms. Jahn: Alright, so I am Mattaniah Jahn. I represent SBA Towers and T-Mobile for the Naples
6 Cell Tower Project. This is a Neighborhood Information Meeting. This is a question and answer
session that is required by the County and their Code. There are no decisions going to be made
today. It is a recorded session. So, the recording will be in the file so that way Planning, the
Adjudicator, which may be the Hearing Examiner or the Planning Commission, the Board of
County Commissioners will have the ability to look at this video.
Ms. Aleman: Okay
Ms. Jahn: So, as I said, this is just a question and answer session. There won't be any decisions or
votes today. I am just going to tell you about this project.
Ms. Aleman: Okay, number 1, first before you make any declarations, number 1, you did not post
a variance sign, neither in the front on in the back, so we cannot continue until you post. You only
posted it in the newspaper. That was it. Number 1. Number 2, I live next door. The eagles are the
one's getting paid for that cell tower. You were very deceptive. You put 4111 Green Blvd. when
in actuality you are putting the tower on 15ffi Avenue SW, in the back of the property. So, that's
where I am coming in. If you want to buy my property for 2.5 million, then I will be more than
happy to sell it to you. I don't want my family members to be exposed to your radiation, nor anyone
that lives in the street. There is families there. Okay. There are families there and that is what I am
telling you. I'm gonna go straight through everything I have to go through to stop this. If I have to
take down every single person in that street and believe me I have knocked on every door.
Ms. Jahn: Okay, well, do you want me to tell you about this project?
Page 1 of 8
Packet Pg. 2936
17.E.7
Ms. Aleman: Go ahead.
Ms. Jahn: Just to clear up any confusion as far as signs go, when this is set for hearing, there will
be a sign requirement under the County code. A sign is not required for Neighborhood Information
Meetings. So, we sent out a notice mailer to neighboring property owners, there is a required
I
U
radius. And then, we also placed an ad in the newspaper. And, that is just meeting the requirements
L
of the code.
Ms. Aleman: But, you didn't ma'am. You did not, because you placed it in the newspaper knowing
m
that nobody was going to look at it and you did not place it on the property. You did not place it
in the back nor did you place it in the front. Okay, when I went for a variance, I had to put it in the
newspaper, and I had to post in the front of my property and in the back of my property. Don't
r
look at that person, I'm telling you what's happening. You will not get this. Believe me, I will try
whatever, you will not pass this, believe me. And, you put the wrong address. You were deceptive,
L;
you should have put that it was going on 15th Avenue SW, which is the back part of 4111 Green
o
Street.
CD
o
Ms. Jahn: So, we were required to put an address off of Green Street because it accesses off of
Green Street. The tower is in the middle of the property and it will not have access off of 15th
Street.
Ms. Aleman: It's in the back of the property. I'm next door to that property. Across the street is
another family with kids. I know you don't care but I want to tell you, why don't you tell the Eagles
to put that tower in one of their homes and see if they like it. Okay? I don't want the tower next to
my house. I don't. I have grandkids there. I don't want it.
Ms. Jahn: Let me move into talking about the tower itself and then if you have any questions
afterwards, we can take care of those questions and I can let you get on with your evening.
Ms. Aleman: Yes
Ms. Jahn: There is a planner here, were Ray Bellows, with the Growth Management Division, if
you have any questions about the process. We are in Conditional Use and Variance application.
Those applications have been submitted to the County and staff has reviewed them. Now we are
holding this Neighborhood Information Meeting. And, after this, staff will finalize their review
and then this will be separate. Let me go in and share my screen real quick. Share this. Alright,
can you see the PowerPoint presentation? It should be a white and blue screen that says Naples 6.
Ms. Aleman: Yes
Ms. Jahn: Wonderful. Before I go talking about the tower itself, I am going to talk about the need
that requires it to be built in the first place. And, when it comes down to it there are 2 reasons. One
is coverage and that is the primary reason for this tower. Coverage is...
Ms. Aleman: Well, why don't you put this tower in Port Royal or why don't you put it in one of
the communities or why don't you put it in Naples Park? Why do you have to put it in working
class people's homes? Why? Why? I don't care about the lack of coverage from Verizon or AT&T.
Page 2 of 8
Packet Pg. 2937
17.E.7
Ms. Jahn: Because some cell towers work as a network and they cover a very small area. So, this
isn't like a radio station. So, for example, I grew up near a FM radio station in Sarasota and they
had a tower on City Island in the middle of Sarasota Bay and they could reach as far North as St.
Petersburg and as far South as Venice, that is like 30 miles in each direction. A cell tower covers
a very small radius. In very dense urban areas you can have towers as close as 3/4 mile apart and
some times a little less. And, it is because they just reach out to a small portion and serve the
population around them. So, the other thing that is going on is capacity. Cell towers are just like
roads. They have a limited amount of traffic that they can take before they reach maximum, and
they overload. And, as you get closer they perform worse and worse until they stop working.
Basically, once a tower fully reaches its capacity, it can't take new calls. And, so, this tower is
primarily coverage but there is also a capacity function to it that neighboring towers are trying to
pick up calls from the Estates area and so they are being burdened with that capacity to a point it
has triggered a need for a new tower, and they can't add more antennas to the existing towers. The
way that the tower development process works is that the carrier always looks first to see if they
can upgrade their existing towers because that is the simplest solution to keep their customers
happy. After that, they look for other existing towers or tall structures like office buildings they
can collocate on because if they can that is a lot quicker and easier to get the service online to the
customers then going through zoning. Building a new tower is actually the hardest route and it
takes the longest time. Here in Collier County, it functionally takes ... I'm sorry ... we are getting
this door closed because there is some ice machine in the background.
Ms. Aleman: Okay
Ms. Jahn: So, that is the longest amount of time. In Collier County, in real time, it takes the better
part of two years to get a tower developed. So, if there were easier options, they would be taking
them is what I am trying to say. If there were existing towers to put it on.
Ms. Aleman: Then put it somewhere else. Put it where there is nobody that can get hurt. Nobody
that can get cancer. Nobody that has a family next door. Why don't you put it in your house? How
would you like it to have someone put it in your house? I don't think you would like it. I don't
even think you would like it down the street from your house.
Ms. Jahn: When I get up in the morning I can look out my back window and see a cell tower.
Ms. Aleman: Oh well, I guess you like to see cell towers. Yeah and cancer, but I don't. I don't
want to put that next door. I think you need to move that tower. Believe me, I am going to get
everyone I can in the that block and I am going to block this because it isn't fair to that street. It is
not fair to the working-class people of that street. Go put it in the rich people's area, in Port Royal,
Naples Park, Pelican Bay. You can put it there. Okay? You can put it there. You don't have to put
it in my neighborhood. Okay? You don't. I don't care what kind of things you say, you are not.
Believe me that I, if you do it is gonna be a lot of problems because I am going to stir it up. Okay?
I'm gonna get. I'm gonna get. I'm even gonna get petitions from my street and from all the other
streets next to it. So, you won't go on it. Go to somewhere else. Go to wherever you can go to and
use their property. Not the property next to my house. You want to take 115 feet from my property
and you had the nerve to send that guy Mike Rodriguez to my house which the next time he comes
Page 3 of 8
Packet Pg. 2938
17.E.7
to my house and its from you, to have something signed, he had the nerve to tell me to sign it??!!
To take 115 feet? Get out of here! What kind of jerk you think I am?
Ms. Jahn: So, as far as that goes, I know that the Eagles tried to reach out to you to...
Ms. Aleman: No, the Eagles tried to deceive me. Sorry, I have camera video in my office where
he came in and I will bring that, okay? So, don't even go there because I have evidence on that,
Okay? And, that's the one thing I did when he came in with that freaking paper for me to sign. I
let that camera, that piece, I let it roll. So, you go ahead. Continue now. And, it isn't illegal to put
it in my house. He came to my house. I didn't tell him to come here. Go ahead.
Ms. Jahn: So, this is a map showing the aerial around the Monopine. The green marker is the
Monopine. On this map up is North. And, to the South you go down toward Golden Gate City.
The road that is running North and South over to the East is Collier Blvd. and then you can see
Green Blvd., running East and West below it. The way that SBA came to the property is they
researched an area starting just South of Green Blvd. and looking further North on Collier to try
to find parcels that were larger than this and provided better setbacks. And, they went through and
just systematically tried to find locations and unfortunately they did not pan out. That is how they
ultimately ended up with this parcel.
Ms. Aleman: Well, they better pan out somewhere else because that ain't going to pan out because
they are getting paid, the Eagles, because of you, and I'm not gonna have my daughter move from
that house because of your company. And, I'll be honest with you, if I have to bring this to the
news, I will. I don't care anymore. I'm so fed up and my daughter works at ABC, darling. So,
we'll bring this. You want to bring this? We'll bring it. Go ahead, go ahead, some more ... she
works on the news on the newscaster. So, go ahead, go ahead, what else are you going to tell me?
Ms. Jahn: So, this is a closer view.
Ms. Aleman: Go ahead!
Ms. Jahn: The Monopine is going to located, is proposed to be located just North of the parking
lot and just South of the wooded area on this lot. They are not going to be removing the wooded
area. That is all going to stay in place. It was proposed to be located on the East side of the property,
basically as far as they can push it. They are actually asking for a variance to the East to provide
more separation to the West. The actual driveway would come down and connect to Green Blvd.
So, there would be no connection to 15th Street. There would be no removal of the trees.
Ms. Aleman: You better not touch my property. or you'll pay 2.5 million for it. Believe me, I will
go to court for that. It's not worth that, but you will pay for that. Don't laugh because I have won
cases before. Don't laugh.
Ms. Jahn: No, this project is proposed only on the Eagles property so there is no proposal to go
onto your property at all.
Ms. Aleman: You guys had a paper saying that you wanted to take 115' of my land to put that. If
you touch my land. If your bulldozers touch my land. If anyone touches my land, I will go to court.
Page 4 of 8
Packet Pg. 2939
17.E.7
And, I don't care because my sister is a lawyer, so I don't to pay. I really don't care. I'll pay court
costs. And, I'm a win, win situation so I don't care.
Ms. Jahn: Okay, I understand your position. Nobody is trying to take your land.
Ms. Aleman: No, nobody is trying to take my land, you are because what you are doing is all of
those people in that land is gonna get radiation from your tower. Move your tower somewhere
else. Move it to one of the Eagles family's houses. Some of them live around there. You probably
can use it. Try that Mike Rodriguez.
Ms. Jahn: So, the location itself, we are trying to stay near major roads and not go further into the
residential area of the Estates. As a matter of fact,
Ms. Aleman: Oh so you will go further in the residential areas of the working class. Do me a favor
and call CBS. My daughter is here so I don't care, call her. Go ahead, go ahead.
Ms. Jahn: So, what is proposed is a 150' tall Monopine cell tower. When I say Monopine, it means
the tower has a single support and that support is painted brown. Onto that support pole are
mounted foliated branches which have leaves on them. All of the leaves are hurricane rated but
they actually can sway in the breeze. The antennas themselves are nestled inside that canopy of
branches and painted green. All of the cabling for the antennas are routed inside the Monopine
itself. Most people consider this to look along the lines of the Norfolk pine on the East Coast.
Ms. Aleman: A what?
Ms. Jahn: A Norfolk pine.
Ms. Aleman: A what? I don't know what that is.
Ms. Jahn: A Norfolk pine is just a species of a tree. This Monopine will be designed to hold up to
4 carriers and T-Mobile will be the anchor tenant and be located at the top. There are 3 additional
spaces that will be available. Those spaces will be available at market rates and what that does is
that prevents, or your county codes encourages towers to be shared. So, let's say Verizon comes
along and they need a tower in the area, they will be encouraged to collocate on an existing tower
instead of building their own tower. So, it reduces the number of total towers in the area.
Ms. Aleman: So, in other words, you are getting paid to kill everyone on the street? You having 4
carriers on your tower? So, you are getting paid for us to get sick, right?
Ms. Jahn: No, no one is...
Ms. Aleman: Oh okay, go ahead, go ahead Darling.
Ms. Jahn: So, this is the layout and the plans unfortunately are laid out sideways so in this view
North is on the right-hand side and this just shows where the Monopine will be located on the
property. It is the circle you see in the middle, bottom. That is the actual Monopine itself. And,
then you can see a square around it. That is the compound, equipment area. That will have a
concrete wall with a locked gate. And, outside of that wall will be the codes required landscape
buffer. That consists of a hedge and trees. We are not requesting any variances or waivers from
Page 5 of 8
Packet Pg. 2940
17.E.7
any of these landscaping requirements. You can see from here that there are lines that go up from
the equipment compound to the edge of the existing asphalt. That is the driveway.
Ms. Aleman: You are going into my property.
Ms. Jahn: No ma'am, we are not.
Ms. Aleman: I see the arrow going into my property.
Ms. Jahn: That is a setback measurement arrow.
Ms. Aleman: Okay
Ms. Jahn: That shows the distance. This is just the layout of the equipment area itself. It's a little
bit hard to see on here but you can see T-Mobile's equipment is shown on the, immediately to the
right of the Monopine and then there are spaces there for the additional carriers should they need
to collocate. This is the elevation sheet. So, the way that this works is that the antennas start, or
the branches start further down so that way they appear to rise up from the canopy, the natural
canopy in the area and extend all the way to the top. T-Mobile's antennas will be nestled inside.
You will see that there are callouts here for lights on this tower. That is not the case. The plan sheet
is going to be updated. Lights will not be required. They default to that because normally the
Collier County Mosquito Control ask for it but they have approved a waiver in this instance. So,
it will be dark at night. And, then these are the photo simulations that are in the application file. I
am going to run clockwise from the Northeast and just run around the property. So, this is the view
from Collier Blvd. and 15th Street and you can see that the Monopine is on the pane on the right
hand side. It just looks like a tree extending up from the canopy in this instance and it scales down
to the size of other objects in the area such as that power pole immediately to the left. This is the
view from the intersection of Collier Blvd. and Green Blvd. and you can see here that the
Monopine does have visibility but the canopy extends all the way up from the natural canopy line.
So, it is not like it is a long extension of trunk and then the branches start at the very top. This is
again meant to look something like what people generally call a Monopole. This is the view from
Collier Blvd. and 41 st Lane and at this distance the entirety of the Monopine is blocked by the
existing trees that are in the area. And then, lastly, this is the view from 15 SW Street and there is
visibility here. And you can see from the frontage though that trees on the road front are able to
fully block the Monopine. This is the RF coverage in the area. So, green is reliable coverage and
yellow and red are unreliable coverage. As you can see, the red on the edge of reliable coverage
in the area and as you go further North into the Estates the rest of it is very poor coverage. Is there
anything I can help you with?
Ms. Aleman: No
Ms. Jahn: Okay, and this is the after coverage. So as you can see this is only reaching North about
6 or 7 blocks if I am counting this correctly. These don't cover a very large area. So, but from here
it is able to reach and provide coverage further into the Estates. Alright, so I know I described the
process and I will go through it one more time. There is a conditional use and variance application
with Collier County. Staff has been reviewing it and will finalize their review after this meeting
and we will ultimately be given hearing dates. Public notice was sent out for this Neighborhood
Page 6 of 8
Packet Pg. 2941
17.E.7
Information Meeting. Public notice will be sent out again once a hearing date is given. At that
point signs will be posted on the property. Let's see, I apologize, that is a misprint. I apologize I
do not have a contact point at this time because we are being bumped between staff members. My
contact information is shown there at 727-773-2221. Let me see if I can get...
Ms. Aleman's daughter: Can you go back to the slide before?
Ms. Aleman: Yes, the slide before please.
Ms. Jahn: The slide before? Okay, so this information unfortunately these dates are incorrect so
that will need to be revised. I can send you an email with revised dates but unfortunately this slide
was a little out of date. Let's see what else do I have for you. Here are my safety links for resources
for RF safety if you would like for me to send them over to you. There are links here for the FCC
guidelines and standards. The FDA. The World Health Organization. And, the National Cancer
Institute. And, again, I will be happy to send them over to you if you give me an email address.
And, that is all I have for you. I don't need to take up anymore of your evening with my
presentation. Do you have any more questions for me?
Ms. Aleman: No, I just need to make sure that you put up a sign. Yeah ... my daughter says there
is a contact missing. That you had put up and then you...
Ms. Jahn: There is a contact missing for the County Planner that is assigned to us that is a different
County Planner. Unfortunately, we are kind of in between Planners at the moment.
Ray Bellows: You can just give them my name.
Ms. Jahn: Okay.
Ms. Aleman: What is the other Planner's number?
Ms. Jahn: One moment, let me give you the number for Mr. Bellows at this time. And, Mr. Sabo.
So, I am going to end the share real quick and I am going to look up that number.
Ms. Aleman: Thank you
Ms. Jahn; Alright. Minimized over here. Alright, so Mr. Bellow's number is 239-252-2463
Ms. Aleman: That is the only Planner there?
Ms. Jahn: No, that is Ray Bellows and he is the Zoning Manager. Let me give you James Sabo as
a second contact number. James Sabo, who was our original assigned Planner, is 239-252-2708.
And, again James Sabo was the Planner we were assigned when we filed the applications and Ray
Bellows is the Zoning Manager for the county. Are there any other questions? Is there anything I
can find you?
Ms. Aleman: No, thank you so much.
Ms. Jahn: Well, thank you for giving me part of your evening.
Ms. Aleman: Thank you
Page 7 of 8
Packet Pg. 2942
17.E.7
Ms. Jahn: Have a good night.
Page 8 of 8
Packet Pg. 2943
17.E.7
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development
Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail
to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members
may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD
amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information
Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners
shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons
or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice
contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time,
and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting.
Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are
hereby made a part of this Affidavit yT)qompliance
of Applicant)
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoing Affidavit of compliance as acknowledged before me this day of
Y , 20A0 by � ,who is personally
known to me or who has produced
L4
of Notary Public)
n
Printed Name of Notary
G:MM Procedures/davit Of Compliance - NLM Oct2010.Doc
as identification.
E
ary Public State of Florida
ki Lynn ClarkCommission GG 285454
ires 12/18/2022
Packet Pg. 2944
17.E.7
Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CC
data to others without consent from the CCPA.
Petition: PL20190002859 I Buffer: 1000' 1 Date: 2/4/2021 1 Site b
NAME1
12455 COLLIER BOULEVARD LLC
40TH TERRACE SW LLC
40TH TERRACE SW LLC
A-1 DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS INC
A-1 DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS INC
A-1 DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS INC
ALAFMA LLC
ASSANTI HOLDINGS LLC
ASSEMBLY OF CHRISTIAN CHURCHES
BADIN, ESTEBAN
BEAUPLAN, LOUISETTE
BEJAR, PILAR
BEJARANO, SANDRA
BORDEN, MARTA
CABLE HOLD CO 11 INC
CANNARSA JR, VINCENT RALPH
CHARTON, NATHALIA RIOS
COLETTAJR, JAMES N & MARYANN
COLLIER CNTY
COLLIER HEALTH SERVICES INC
COMMUNITY ASSISTED &
D S BABINSKI 2007 REV TRUST
DE FRANCESCO, JOSEPH G
DEONARINE ENTERPRISE INC
DERVIL, CERALUS
DESTINE, ANNE M & DONEL
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES 4028
GARCIA, MARIA DEL CARMEN
GHANSITYAMBHAI M PATEL
GOLDEN GATE ANIMAL CLINIC
GUARINO, TONY & AMY L
HACKBERRY CORP
HARTUNG, PHILLIP S & MAUREEN S
HERNANDEZ, NOE & ELVA
HERNANDEZ, TOMAS O & MARIA C
HERRERA, JORGE LOUIS
HERRERA, NICHOLAS R
JFD NAPLES LLC
JOHNS, RANDY L & LORRIE J
JONES, NANCY A
KENNETH K HUMISTON REV TRUST
KHP ELDORADO ACQUISITIONS LLC
KINGSHOTT, KATHERINE SARALIE
L L & L J ELWOOD LIVING TRUST
LDJ ASSOC LTD
MARC, ROSALENE
MARONEY, PAUL J
MARTIN BUILDING ABF LLC
MARTIN BUILDING ABF LLC
MARTIN BUILDING ABF LLC
MARTINEZ, LUPE & JUANITA H
NAME2
12455 COLLIER BLVD
1900-A SUNSHINE BLVD
1900-A SUNSHINE BLVD
12525 COLLIER BLVD
12525 COLLIER BLVD
12525 COLLIER BLVD
4860 SYCAMORE DR
14348 TUSCANY POINTE CV
INCORPORATED
1718 41 ST TERR SW
1480 39 ST SW
PABLO ALFARO GD
1700 42ND ST SW
NELSON BORDEN SANCHEZ
ATTN:TAX DEPARTMENT
4190 15TH AVE SW
26 PAROUBEK STREET
3460 17TH AVE SW
TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY
1454 MADISON AVE W
SUPPORTIVE LIVING INC
2520 W 8TH ST STE 1
329 VIRGINIA AVE
1680 40TH TER SW
857 BLUEBIRD ST
1700 41 ST TER SW
PROPERTY TAX - PSX/JB
PROPERTY TAX - PSX/JB
PROPERTY TAX - PSX/JB
PROPERTY TAX-PSX/JB
PROPERTY TAX-PSX/JB
4111 GREEN BLVD
1719 41 ST ST SW #1
REVOCABLE TRUST
1550 40TH TER SW
3898 27TH AVE SW
24644 SARGENT AVE
4120 15TH AVE SW
4201 17TH AVE SW
2431 18TH AVE NE
4109 15TH AVE SW
4211 GREEN BLVD
11693 BALD EAGLE WAY
4260 15TH AVE SW
5365 GREEN BLVD
324 SHARWOOD DR
9217 SQUIRREL RUN CT
4157 17TH AVE SW
4145 15TH AVE SW
% A E BROOKS
WILLIAMS CELESTIN
2281 SANTA BARBARA BLVD
12455 COLLIER BLVD
12455 COLLIER BLVD
12455 COLLIER BLVD
4140 13TH AVE SW
Mailing List I Packet Pg. 2945
17.E.7
PA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided d
ocation: 37931280001
NAME3 NAME4 NAME5
1510 39TH ST SW
4223 15TH AVE SW
4125 17TH AVE SW
1701 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD FL 32
2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S
1401 16TH ST
700 UNIVERSE BLVD
700 UNIVERSE BLVD
700 UNIVERSE BLVD
700 UNIVERSE BLVD
700 UNIVERSE BLVD
3091 55TH TER SW
8800 SW 116TH ST
4189 17TH AVE SW
Mailing List I Packet Pg. 2946
17.E.7
ata. The recipient may not transfer this
NAME6
FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 6044
35832480009 U
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0
35777280005 U
V
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0
35777320004 U
L
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5243
35832680003 U
3
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 5243
35832720002 U
G
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 5243
35832760004 U
13
NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912
37931320000 U
>
NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0
59880000080 U
m
c
NAPLES, FL 34117--- 5366
37995880007 U
y
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0
35771440003 U
a
NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0
37995840005 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5239
37928080007 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5926
35767280002 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5941
35771360002 U
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103--- 2855
35831960009 U
00
c
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5238
37931480005 U
o
LITTLE FERRY, NJ 07643---0
35776720003 U
Cn
NAPLES, FL 34117--- 6122
35832000007 U
N
NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0
75180000201 U
a
IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 --- 0
75180001022 U
SARASOTA, FL 34236--- 2519
35777080001 U
o
SIOUX FALLS, SD 57104 --- 0
35831360007 U
r
MOUNT WASHINGTON, PA 15211--- 1513
35833000006 U
a
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 6073
35832040009 U
NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0
35776640002 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5922
35771400001 U
o
JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 --- 0
37929760009 U
N
JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 --- 0
37931080104 U
c
JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 --- 0
37931120103 U
c
JUNO BEACH, FL 33408--- 2657
37931160008 U
v
JUNO BEACH, FL 33408--- 2657
37995720002 U
c
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5221
37931280001 U
G
r
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0
35776600000 U
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0
35776680004 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 6037
35831880008 U
E
NAPLES, FL 34117--- 7148
35777240003 U
c
SOUTHFIELD, MI 48033 --- 0
35830041000 U
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 5238
37931360002 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5943
35771160008 U
Z
NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3586
35776960009 U
w
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5237
37929640006 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5223
37931440003 U
E
NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0
35777360006 U
t
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5240
37920760008 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5055
37928160008 U
Q
NAPLES, FL 34110--- 5724
37928320000 U
;
ARLINGTON, TX 76002 --- 0
35830560002 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5941
35771280001 U
E
NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 5237
37929520003 U
u
MIAMI, FL 33176--- 4338
37931120006 U
r
Q
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5941
35771200007 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5437
35777480009 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 6044
59880000022 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 6044 59880000048 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 6044 59880000129 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5230 37929800008 U
Mailing List I Packet Pg. 2947
17.E.7
MENDOZA, GADIEL 2354 KEANE CT
MM AND JD HOLDINGS LLC 11128 PALMETTO RIDGE DRIVE
MONTALVO INC
280 35 TH AVE NE
MORA, MARIA R
1460 39TH ST SW
NESBIT, RAYMOND W & GINA M
4231 15TH AVE SW
OLIVER, LISA M
4150 15TH AVE SW
O'NEILL PARTNERS LLC
10081 NW 7TH ST
PACIFICA NAPLES LLC
ATTN: MF DEPT
U
PEREZ, JHONNY M MANUELES
4135 15TH AVE SW
m
PUCCI, DARLAN
1680 39TH ST SW
c
RAJSTORE 3 LLC
5280 BOXWOOD WAY
0
RAMOS, ABELARDO A & SILVIA
2911 GOLDEN GATE BLVD
RAMOS, JOSE
2000 54TH TER SW APT A
pp
RAMOS, JOSE
2000 54TH TER SW APT A
c
RICHARD A FAUST REV TRUST
6011 WESTPORT LN
L
RICHARD A FAUST REV TRUST
6011 WESTPORT LN
C9
ROTH, HARRY J
4180 13TH AVE SW
SALAS, JERONIMO & ISABEL
4214 29TH PL SW
SANTILLI, MARLENE
224 OWL CT
SCHIRARD, CARA L
4219 15TH AVE SW
Co
SCHOFIELD, GARY P & DONNA M
4221 15TH AVE SW
o
STANCEL, ERICK ALAN
YSIS Y REYES
o
STARR III, RONALD J
PAULA VAN WYK STARR
m
STARR JR, RONALD J
4121 15TH AVE SW
N
STATON REVOCABLE TRUST
2731 13TH ST INd
STATON, JONATHAN R
1700 41 ST ST SW APT B
STETSON II, DAVE B
LYNZEE S MORRIS
0
SUZUKI REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
2447 YAFFE DR
r
TORRES, MANUEL A & ANA C
1660 39TH ST SW
a
TREAMER, RICHARD L
PATRICIA A RACO-TREAMER
=
TRIGUERO, LENIA
2856 BLOSSOM CT
_
UNITY FAITH MISSIONARY
BAPTIST CHURCH
0
N
USA
% SEC OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
WILLIAMS TR, ROBERT E
JERELYN J COBB TR
o
WILLIAMS, AMOS G & FREDDIE J
4215 17TH AVE SW
o
WOJCIECHOWSKI, ALICE D
4141 17TH AVE SW
v
YOUR CHOICE CAR WASH LLC
12481 COLLIER BLVD
r_
0
REFERENCE ONLY
MARTIN BUILDING, THE
JEUNE, PIERRE DANIEL LOUIS
MARIE-CLAUDIE SAINT-HUBERT
Mailing List I Packet Pg. 2948
17.E.7
1775 HANCOCK ST
1936 46TH STREET SOUTHWEST
4111 15TH AVE SW
DAVID B STETSON
E,IBill dc11::I_VI
PO BOX 990639
DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
ROBERT E WILLIAMS TRUST
A CONDOMINIUM
2983 RUE LE STOCKHOLM
STE 200
U
L
d
3
0
F-
1560 39TH ST SW
LOAN GUARANTY SERVICE 3401 WEST END AVE STE 760W
JERELYN J COBB TRUST 3240 5TH AVE SW
m
1,
r
r
r
Mailing List
Packet Pg. 2949
17.E.7
NAPLES, FL
34117 ---
0 35767320001 U
NAPLES, FL
34110 ---
0 35832440007 U
NAPLES, FL
34120 ---
0 35832960008 U
NAPLES, FL
34117 ---
0 37995800003 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5239 37928040005 U
NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5238 37931400001 U
PLANTATION, FL 33324--- 1054
35777120000 U
SAN DIEGO,
CA 92110 --- 0
35830040001 U
U
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 0
37929600004 U
NAPLES, FL
34117--- 5367
37996080000 U
c
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 0
35831840006 U
0
NAPLES, FL
34120 --- 0
35777440007 U
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 6881
35777160002 U
pp
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 6881
35777200001 U
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 5419
35832800003 U
L
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 5419
35832920006 U
a
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 5230
37929400000 U
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 8304
37995920006 U
FREMONT, CA 94539--- 6200
35776760005 U
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 5239
37928200007 U
co
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 5239
37928280001 U
o
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 0
59880000064 U
o
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 5237
37929680008 U
cn
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 5237
37929560005 U
J
NAPLES, FL
34103--- 4531
35777040009 U
a
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 6272
35777000007 U
NAPLES, FL
34117 --- 0
37995960008 U
o
SAN LEANDRO, CA 94588 --- 0
75180000023 U
NAPLES, FL
34117--- 5367
37996120009 U
a
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 0
37929720007 U
NAPLES, FL
34120--- 7528
35777400005 U
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 6000
37996000006 U
0
N
NASHVILLE,
TN 37203 --- 0
37928240009 U
NAPLES, FL
34117--- 4102
59880000103 U
o
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 5943
35771120006 U
o
NAPLES, FL
34116--- 5941
35771320000 U
v
NAPLES, FL
34116 --- 0
35832520008 U
c
35831920007 N
LAUREL H7K 3T6 CANADA
35771240009 F
Mailing List I Packet Pg. 2950
17.E.7
935 Main Street, Suite D
Safety Harbor FL 3469
Telephone: (727� 773-222
Facsimile: (727) 773-261
February 5, 2021
Property Owner
Property Owner Address
Property Owner, City, State and Zip Code
Dear Property Owner:
Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval
of a Conditional Use with companion Variances for the following described property:
The subject site is on parcel #37931280001, at 4111 Green Blvd. Project #PL20190002859
The petitioner is asking the County to approve this application to allow development of a 150'
Above Ground Level telecommunications tower and related compound on the described property.
In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information
Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development
intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The
Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on February 24, 2021 at 5:30pm at Springhill
Suites by Marriott, 3798 White Lake Blvd., Naples, FL 34117. You may also choose to attend
the meeting by Zoom. The meeting ID is 8610473 8979 and the passcode is 249782.
At this meeting, the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be
developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please
contact me.
Sincerely,
Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq.
MSJ/vlc
Packet Pg. 2951
I 17.E.7 I
Pine Ridge RD
Project
U
L
Location
m '
Green BLVD
,L^
V
D
V r
u
N
Packet Pg. 2952
17.E.7
tW6
OFT# USA TODAY NETWORK
Published Daily
Naples, FL 34110
LAW OFFICE OF MATTANIAH S JAHN PA
935 MAIN ST # D 1
SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WISCONSIN
COUNTY OF BROWN
Before the undersigned they serve as the authority,
personally appeared who on oath says that they serve
as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily
newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida;
distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the
attached copy of the advertising was published in said
newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the
said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at
Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said
newspaper has heretofore been continuously published
in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and
Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,
in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year
next preceding the first publication of the attached copy
of advertisement and affiant further says that he has
neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation
any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the
purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in
the said newspaper.
2/11/2021
Subscribed and sworn to before on February 11th, 2021:
_._........ :_.-')Gi I.CA_._ YVt. uYX CQ...t.rx-.. --}
Notary, State of WI, County of Brown
TARA MONDLOCt-i
Notary Public;
State of Wisconsin
My commission expires: August 6, 2021
PUBLICATION COST: S1,008.00
AD NO: GC10588230
CUSTOMER NO: 346954
PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE
Packet Pg. 2953
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by
Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. of the Law Office of Mattaniah S. Jahn, P.A.,
representing Capital Telecom Holdings 11, LLC on:
Monday, February 24, 2021 at 5:30p.m. at
Springhill Suites, 3798 White Lake Blvd., Naples, FL 34117
Subject Property: No address assigned — Parcel No. 3263472-0009,
3263460-0006, & 3263464-0008 — Project # PL20190002859
Capital is requesting Collier County to consider a Conditional Use
to allow a communications tower on lands zoned Rural Agricultural
(A) within the Mobile Home Overlay (MHO) and designated Rural
Fringe Mixed Use -Sending Lands within the Natural Resource
Protection Area Overlay and North Belle Meade Overlay in the
Collier County Growth Management Plan. The subject property is
.93 acres, consisting of 3 parcels, located on the east side of the
north -south extension of Benton Road in Section 25, Township 49
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome
to attend the presentation and discuss the project with Mattaniah S.
Jahn, Esq. and Collier County staff. You may also attend remotely
using Zoom. If you would like to participate remotely, please contact
Vicki Clark for the link information. If you are unable to attend this
meeting in person or by Zoom, but have questions or comments, they
can be directed by mail, phone, or e-mail to:
Vicki Clark, Planner
Mattaniah S. Jahn, P.A.
935 Main Street, Suite D 1
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
727-773-2221
vclark @ thelawmpowered.com
Packet Pg. 2954
Naccinseaz3ao�
17.E.8
�yTeJ► 's I �►
(CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT)
A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar
days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through
the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not
be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative
Code, Chapter 8 E.
The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or
easement.
The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened
securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage.
The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action
has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the
petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s
NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE
RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE
ASSIGNED PLANNER.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PE SONALLY APPEARED 1 `� 1 OMMk' a ` S ' 73� h
WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POST D PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE
ZO COLLIER COUNTYLAND DEv� PMENT ODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER
NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED)
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
a3S M6LA%n S� SW k. [)(
STREET OR P.O. BOX
Sam.-KA N-axbor , F1 3Lfb5
CITY, STAT ZIP
The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this day of (0C*,Qbe.X" , 20A, by
ri ak = 4h s ' 1� , ersonall own to me or who produced as identification
and who did/did not take an oath.
EE,
i�AYA ABUNADA
Notary Public -State of Florida
_*g Commission HH 168806
K., My Commission Expires
��u` August 24, 2025
My Commission Expires:
(Stamp with serial number)
CA .
Signature of Notary Public
nL
C., M umd(!%
Print d lame of Notary Public
Q
Rev. 3/4/2015
Packet Pg. 2955
17.E.8
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
4111 Green Blvd Communication Tower
Conditional Use and Variance
Petition No. 20190002859 & PL20200000721
CCPC: November 4, 2021 - 9:00 a.m.
BCC: ❑ecember 147 2021 - 9:00 a.m.
Collier Government Center
3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112
Laura CeJohn: 239-252-5587
0
Packet Pg. 2956
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER
RESOLUTIONS
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners (BCC) on December 14, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,
Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL, to consider the enactment of
two County Resolutions. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A,M. The titles of the proposed Resolutions
are as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A VARIANCE
FROM SECTIONS 5.O5.09.G.7.b AND 5.05.09.6.7.c OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE
THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE OF A 147-FOOT TALL MONOPINE COMMUNICATION TOWER
FROM 73.5 FEET TO 41 FEET FOR THE EASTERN SUNGATE CENTER CPUD PROPERTY, AND FROM
367.5 FEET TO 131 FEET FOR THE WESTERN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 4111 GREEN
BOULEVARD, ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE EAST 180 FEET OF TRACT 125, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES,
UNIT NO.26 SUBDIVISION, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA. [PL2O2000007211
AND
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER WITHIN
THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 2.03.O1.6.1.02 AND 5.05.09 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A 2.73* ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4111
GREEN BOULEVARD, ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE EAST 180 FEET OF TRACT 125'0F GOLDEN GATE
ESTATES, UNIT NO.26 SUBDIVISION, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL2019O0028591
Project
Location �
J
93
Green ttLVU
U
Copies of the proposed Resolutions are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to
attend and be heard.
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be
addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization
or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an
Rem,
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3
weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the
appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become
a permanent part of the record.
As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as
well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within
the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/visftors/calendar-of-events after
the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting or any deadline specified within
the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate
remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical
issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov.
Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to
you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail
East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing
impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN
17. E.9
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
ND- 1-73026-01
Packet Pg. 2957