Agenda 12/14/2021 Item #16A24 (RFP Contract #20-7811 to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.)16.A.24
12/14/2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the selection committee's final ranking for Request for
Proposal ("RFP") No. 20-7811, "Immokalee Area Improvements - TIGER Grant," and
authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firm, Quality Enterprises
USA, Inc., so that staff can bring a proposed agreement back for the Board's consideration
at a future meeting.
OBJECTIVE: To approve the selection committee's ranking of RFP No. 20-7811, and to authorize
staff to negotiate an agreement to engage professional design -build services for the Immokalee
Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant Project.
CONSIDERATIONS: In May 2018, the County learned that it was awarded the TIGER 2017
discretionary grant for the Immokalee Complete Streets - Growing Connections to Create
Mobility Opportunities Project ("TIGER Project"), which is designed to grow the existing
pedestrian network by providing new facilities to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians where
none currently exist. By expanding the small network of pedestrian and bicycle routes, the
TIGER Project will more than double the number of current facilities in the area and provide
enhanced options for transportation to education, jobs, and other essential services for residents
of Immokalee.
On January 26, 2021, the Procurement Services Division issued a notice of RFP No. 20-7811
Design Build - Step 1 - Immokalee Area Improvements - TIGER Grant, and received six
responsive and responsible proposals by the February 25, 2021, deadline. The County requested
a minimum of three references from those firms' clients on projects for which the firms provided
services similar in scope and complexity. A selection committee met on March 23, 2021, scored
each of the proposals, and shortlisted all the firms to move to on to Step 2, presentations, as
follows:
- Wright Construction Group, Inc.
- Ajax Paving Industries of Florida, LLC
- Owen -Ames -Kimball Company
- Quality Enterprises USA Inc.
Owen -Ames -Kimball Company did not submit a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Proposal
and did not move on to Step 2. On September 16, 2021, the selection committee reconvened for
Step 2 and gave presentations to the committee, who then scored and ranked the firms as
follows:
Firm Names
Final Ranking
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
1
Wright Construction Group, Inc.
2
AJAX Paving Industries of Florida, LLC
3
Staff is recommending negotiations with the top ranked firm, Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
Quality Enterprises has multi -disciplined design experience locally, has been in business for 26
Packet Pg. 1172
16.A.24
12/14/2021
years, and is reputable with a good work history.
Subject to the Board's approval of staff s above recommendation, staff will begin contract
negotiations with Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., so that a proposed negotiated agreement can be
brought back for the Board's consideration at a future meeting. If staff is unable to reach an
agreement with the number one ranked firm, staff will continue negotiating with the remaining
firms in ranked order.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item does not result in a direct fiscal impact; however, the
source of funding for the future contract (subject to board approval at a subsequent meeting) will
be from Grant Fund (711), Grant Match (712), Transportation Capital Fund (310) and
Stormwater Bond Fund (327), Project 33563.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires
majority vote for Board approval. -SRT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The improvements identified in this RFP are
consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: To approve the selection committee's final ranking for Request for
Proposal ("RFP") No. 20-7811, "Immokalee Area Improvements - TIGER Grant," and authorize
staff to begin contract negotiations with the top -ranked firm, Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., as
provided above, so that a proposed agreement can be brought back for the Board's consideration
at a future meeting.
Prepared by: Michael Tisch, Project Manager, Transportation Engineering Division
ATTACHMENT(S)
1.20-7811 - Step 2 - Final Ranking (PDF)
2.20-7811 Notice of Recommended Award (PDF)
3.20-7811 - Design Build Step 2 Solicitation (PDF)
4. QE_Immokalee Area Improvements_ -_TIGER Grant_8Addendums (PDF)
Packet Pg. 1173
16.A.24
12/14/2021
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.A.24
Doc ID: 20436
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the selection committee's ranking for Request for
Proposal ("RFP") # 20-7811, "Immokalee Area Improvements - TIGER Grant," and authorize staff to
begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firm, Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., so that staff can bring
a proposed agreement back for the Board's consideration at a subsequent meeting.
Meeting Date: 12/14/2021
Prepared by:
Title: — Transportation Engineering
Name: Michael Tisch
12/06/2021 12:56 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - Transportation Eng — Transportation Engineering
Name: Jay Ahmad
12/06/2021 12:56 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Transportation Engineering
Anthony Khawaja
Additional Reviewer
Growth Management Department
Lissett DeLaRosa
Growth Management Department
Procurement Services
Sandra Herrera
Additional Reviewer
Procurement Services
Sandra Herrera
Level 1 Purchasing Gatekeeper
Growth Management Department
Anthony Khawaja
Additional Reviewer
Growth Management Department
Lisa Abatemarco
Additional Reviewer
Growth Management Department
Lisa Taylor
Additional Reviewer
Growth Management Department
Gene Shue
Additional Reviewer
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management
Ian Barnwell
Growth Management Department
Trinity Scott
Transportation
Grants
Valerie Fleming
Level 2 Grants Review
County Attorney's Office
Scott Teach
Level 2 Attorney Review
Office of Management and Budget
Debra Windsor
Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review
County Attorney's Office
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review
Grants
Therese Stanley
Additional Reviewer
Growth Management Operations Support
Christopher Johnson
Completed
12/06/2021 1:18 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 1:20 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 1:25 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 1:26 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 1:29 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 2:59 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 3:56 PM
Completed
12/06/2021 5:32 PM
Additional Reviewer Completed
Completed
12/07/2021 8:31 AM
Completed
12/07/2021 8:54 AM
Completed
12/07/2021 9:12 AM
Completed
12/07/2021 9:18 AM
Completed
12/07/2021 9:19 AM
Completed
12/07/2021 10:40 AM
Additional Reviewer Completed
Packet Pg. 1174
12/14/2021
County Manager's Office
Board of County Commissioners
Growth Management Department
Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review
Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending
Michael Tisch Growth Management
Completed 12/08/2021 10:55 AM
12/14/2021 9:00 AM
Skipped 10/20/2021 11:16 AM
Packet Pg. 1175
m
14
�
$
/
§
/
0
(o|o! m;uoo eje U]el ale oww|:9 tO Z Bu|jueM mm]- zdejS -� -0 :juewq3844V
§
a
�
\
/
e
2
IC
§
)]
c
o
0
_
m
r
\£
m
m
\
}
\
k
kn
00
_
G
t�
§
m
/
)�
oll
ot /
®
)§
w
§
J
E
*
&
\
&
9
\
#
)2
]a
)
■
m
&
2
d
t
-
) )
kcq
3�
rn
2 �
7
6
�
j
�
]
a
§k\
4
k\\
\
�
GO
\
\\/
\
\
G
m
\
\
q
DocuSign Envelope ID: 13F67853-DD01-4B9B-B2BE-575F2495BA7B
16.A.24. b
Coer County
Administrative Services Department
Procurement Services Division
Notice of Recommended Award
Solicitation: 20-7811 Title: Design Build - Immokalee Area Improvements - TIGER Grant
Due Date and Time: September 2, 2021 at 3:00 pm
Respondents:
Company Name
City
County
State
Final Ranking
Responsive/Responsible
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
Naples
Collier
FL
1
Yes/Yes
Wright Construction Group
Fort Myers
Lee
FL
2
Yes/Yes
Ajax Paving Industries of Florida,
LLC
Fort Myers
Lee
FL
3
Yes/Yes
Owen -Ames -Kimball Company
Naples
Collier
FL
Not Ranked
Yes/Yes
Astra Construction Services, LLC
Woodstock
Cherokee
GA
Not Ranked
Yes/Yes
Coastal Concrete Products, LLC
Fort Myers
Lee
FL
Not Ranked
Yes/Yes
Utilized Local Vendor Preference: Yes 0 No -
On January 26, 2021, the Procurement Services Division issued a notice of a Request for Proposal Solicitation
20-7811 Design Build -Step 1-Immokalee Area Improvements —TIGER Grant to forty-eight thousand six
hundred ninety-eight (48,698) vendors. Vendors viewed one hundred eighty-five (185) bid packages and on
February 25, 2021, the County received four (4) bids. All six (6) proposers were found to be responsive/
responsible. The Selection Committee met on March 23, 2021, and as described in Step 1 of the Solicitation
documents, the committee scored each of the proposals and shortlisted the following top four (4) firms to
move on to Step 2:
- Wright Construction Group
- Ajax Paving Industries of Florida, LLC
- Owen -Ames -Kimball Company
- Quality Enterprises USA Inc.
One firm was contacted to resolve a minor irregularity. Owen -Ames -Kimball Company and Hole Montes did
not submit a GMP Proposal and did not move on to Step 2. On September 16, 2021, the Selection Committee
reconvened for Step 2, presentations were given, and the Committee scored and ranked the firms as follows:
1. Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. and Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P. A.
2. Wright Construction Group and Johnson Engineering
3. Ajax Paving Industries of Florida, LLC. and WGI, Inc.
Staff recommends negotiating a contract with the top ranked firm, Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
DocuSignedbyRequired Signatures
Project Manager: Michael Tisch NdA,�, ,�iSd1t. 9 20 2021
641 DocuSigned by:
Procurement Strategist: Barbara Lance E&MKzn� 9/20/2021
14490C19A3D448F...
Pr Qr>' �t6ervices Director:
� H 9/zo/2ou
Sa Zr teT4?eWa4F5- Date
oo
ti
0
N
C
m
E
t
:.1
M
.r
Q
Packet Pg. 1177
16.A.24.c
Collier County
Administrative Services Department
Procurement Services Division
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) — STEP 2
In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055
Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act
FOR
DESIGN -BUILD OF
Immokalee Area Improvements — TIGER Grant
RFP NO.: 20-7811
LISA OIEN, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST
PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION
3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
TELEPHONE: (239) 252-8935
Lisa.Oien@colliercountyfl.gov (Email)
This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format. Any alterations to this
document made by the Consultant may be grounds for rejection of proposal, cancellation of any
subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County Government.
Packet Pg. 1178
INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
FOR INITIAL SUBMITTAL
16.A.24.c
REQUEST FOR PROFESSINAL
20-7811
SERVICES RFP NUMBER:
PROJECT TITLE:
Design Build Step 2 — Immokalee Area Improvements — Tiger Grant
PRE -PROPOSAL CONFERENCE:
N/A
LOCATION:
N/A
RFP OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME:
September 2, 2021 at 3:00 P.M - tentative
PLACE OF RFP OPENING:
PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION
3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2
NAPLES, FL 34112
SELECTION COMMITTEE
September 16, 2021
REVIEW, SCORE, AND
PRESENTATIONS:
NOTICE OF RECOMMENDED AWARD
September 23, 2021
ANNOUNCED:
NEGOTIATIONS:
October 2021— December 2021
NOTICE TO PROCEED:
Aril 18, 2022
START DATE OF CONSTRUCTION
November 15, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS:
PLANNED COMPLETION OF
January 31, 2026
CLOSEOUT DOCUMENTATION FOR
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS:
NOTE: SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE
All proposals shall be submitted online via the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System:
h!Ws://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/
INTRODUCTION
Through the issuance of this Request for Professional Services — Step 2 (RFP — Step 2), the Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees
& Program Management Division (hereinafter, the "Division or Department"), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners
Procurement Services Division (hereinafter, "County") is hereby soliciting sealed Technical Proposals, Guaranteed Maximum Price
(GMP), and Presentations for a contract to perform Design -Build for the Immokalee Area Improvements -TIGER Grant project.
The issuance of this RFP - Step 2 is the second step in a two-step solicitation process for the Project. By utilizing a Design -Build
(D-B) project delivery approach, the County expects to secure substantial benefits. These expected benefits include timely and
efficient scheduling, optimal risk allocation, competitive design selection, innovation, clear assignment of performance
responsibilities to a single contracting entity, long-term reliability, and life -cycle cost savings. Another expected benefit is the full
integration of key design, construction, and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) personnel in all aspects of the Project.
The intent in developing this RFP - Step 2 is to encourage the Proposers to provide the best solution for the Project, consistent with
the Project goals and requirements as defined. Proposers should carefully review this RFP - Step 2 to ensure a clear understanding
of the Project's needs, objectives, work scope, and requirements.
Only the shortlisted firms from the Step 1 process are eligible to respond and those firms are listed below:
Shortlisted Firm 1 - Wright Construction Group and Johnson Engineering
Shortlisted Firm 2 - Ajax Paving Industries of Florida, LLC. and WGI, Inc.
Shortlisted Firm 3 - Owen -Ames -Kimball Company and Hole Montes
Shortlisted Firm 4 - Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. And Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P. A.
20-7811 Design Build Step — 2
c
0
b
N
c
0
0
c
0
'L^
V
w
0
H
d
d
0
E
E
co
M
O
54
Packet Pg. 1179
16.A.24.c
All proposers shall submit Grant Required Technical Proposal Form - LAP Certification of Current Capacity 525-01
with their Technical Proposal — Confidential Information
Tentative solicitation dates:
Provide Step 2 solicitation to eligible firms: July 16, 2021
Technical Proposals Due: September 2, 2021
Selection Committee and Presentations: September 16, 2021
Estimated Project Budget:
The estimated project budget is $16,400,000
Project Completion:
The Final Completion of work shall be within 800 (Eight Hundred) calendar days after the Notice to Proceed. The
Final Completion days include Substantial Completion days of 740 (Seven Hundred Forty) calendar days plus 60
(Sixty) additional calendar days to Final Completion.
Third Party Review:
Collier County will hire a third party to perform independent plan review(s) for plan submittals.
BACKGROUND
In May 2018, Collier County was informed that it was awarded the TIGER IX Discretionary Grant for the Immokalee Complete
Streets - Growing Connections to Create Mobility pportunities Project, which is designed to grow the existing pedestrian network
by providing new facilities to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians where none currently exist. By expanding the small network
of pedestrian and bicycle routes, the TIGER Project will more than double the mobility opportunities in the area and provide
enhanced options for transportation to education, jobs, and other essential services for residents of Immokalee.
Since the time of the award, Collier County, Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT"), United States Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") have been working together to coordinate the details for this
Solicitation.
Collier County Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division staff will be responsible for the
management and administration of this project. The Design/Build phase of the project will be awarded to one of the entities from
the shortlist developed after a review of the information received as a result of this process.
DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL
The County has retained Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC as the Design Criteria Professionals for this Project. Capital Consulting
Solutions, LLC has responsibility for developing and ensuring compliance with the Design Criteria Package for the Project. The Design
Criteria Professional shall also provide assistance to the County as necessary in Project oversight, design reviews, construction
monitoring, start-up assistance, and environmental compliance. All short-listed Proposers will be provided with the Design Criteria
Package Attachment "1" which describes the minimum scope and required quality for design and construction of the project, and it also
provides additional relevant information about the project. The Design Criteria Package generally provides for less than 30% completion
level of the design documents and in no way is it represented as being fmal construction documents.
The Design Criteria Package has not undergone regulatory review and it does not include all the details necessary to identify all
materials and items to construct the project. It will be the Design -Builder's responsibility to develop complete construction documents
with all necessary details commensurate with the scope and quality indicated in the Design Criteria Package and to meet all regulatory
requirements. Each Proposer, by submitting a proposal, certifies that the Proposer acknowledges, understands and agrees that the Design
Criteria Package and other project information provided do not constitute construction documents and do not reflect all of the design,
permitting, regulatory, and construction requirements for the project, and that, notwithstanding the above, these documents are sufficient
in all respects for purposes of the Proposer's preparation and submittal of its Proposal.
Proposers are advised that in no event shall a Proposer include any employee of the firm listed above (nor any employee of Collier
20-7811 Design Build Step — 2
Packet Pg. 1180
County) as part of its team for the Project. All communications with the County or Design Criteria Professionals regard 16.A.24.c
procurement shall be in accordance with the applicable sections of this RFP - Step 2.
PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW AND OBJECTIVES
By utilizing a D-B project delivery approach, the County expects to secure substantial benefits. These expected benefits include efficient
and cost-effective design, construction and operation, optimal risk allocation, competitive design selection, and clear assignment of
performance responsibilities to a single contracting entity. Other expected benefits include the full and appropriately -balanced
integration of key design, construction, and QA/QC personnel in all aspects of the Project development.
The County's project objectives are to ensure:
c
• An overall positive outcome and experience for the communities involved.
0
• Environmental protection through compliance with all regulatory requirements.
L
• Compliance with other performance guarantees identified in the Agreement.
w
c
• Project completion on schedule.
0
• A safe Project construction and operating environment.
• Good neighbor attributes to adjacent properties in terms of noise, vibration, dust, odors, traffic, and lighting impacts.
• Efficient and cost-effective design, permitting, and construction.
• A high degree of coordination between the design, permitting, and construction elements.
LU
w
• Ease of operations and maintenance.
• Consideration and ease of expandability.
H
d
• A high degree of security for the Project Sites.
d
• Construction of an aesthetically -pleasing Project.
0
Y
0
• Successful integration of work completed by others.
E
E
The County desires to optimize creativity, cost -competitiveness and efficient delivery in the D-B process and will therefore provide
some flexibility to Proposers with respect to the design and other applicable elements affected by the overall Program. Nevertheless, it is
w
critical that proposed equipment and designs have been proven to meet the performance requirements of this RFP - Step 2. The
c
proposed project will be subject to all required regulatory approvals including, but not limited to, the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), the United States Army Corp of
c
Engineers (USAGE), and all applicable County and regulatory agencies policies and requirements.
0
The County's schedule expects completion of the Project as noted in Attachment "2". These milestones are a key factor for
implementation of the Project using the D-B procurement method. The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approved
implementation of this Project using the D-B procurement method and solicitation of the RFP - Step 1 and this RFP - Step 2. It is
the County's intent to establish a working partnership among all Project participants - County staff, the Design Criteria
Professional, and the Design -Builder.
SERVICES SUMMARY
The County believes the D-B procurement method will accomplish its objectives. To achieve the optimal benefit from this process,
the County prefers that the Proposer's Project team be one that is a truly integrated team with a genuine, collaborative philosophy.
Such a team would integrate the two prime roles of designer and builder. These prime roles would be integrated in a manner that
supports collaboration and high performing team concepts. This team structure should share risk and reward, contain proper
incentives, and allow for the routine conflict resolution of the issues that typically arise among these two prime roles.
The Design -Builder shall provide the County with the following integrated D-B services:
Overall Project Coordination
o Leadership, coordination and communications with internal and external entities to ensure project success
o Community outreach, input and information to appropriately engage the community and County personnel, and
ensure that overall needs are met
o Coordination of activities that interface with other ongoing and planned County projects in the area and related to
this Project
• Design & Permitting:
o Design of the project and all associated elements outlined
o Comprehensive permitting of all elements of the project as described in the Design Criteria Package
20-7811 Design Build Step — 2
Packet Pg. 1181
16.A.24.c
Construction:
o Construction management and administration
o Construction of the project and all on -site and off -site elements of the project as defined
o Seamless maintenance of operations thorough coordination with all project team members
o Completion of installation and start-up of all required equipment and systems as well as performance and
acceptance tests (where applicable)
o Completion of training of County personnel on individual systems and complete facility operation and
maintenance requirements (where applicable)
o Demolition and Repurposing of existing resources, including transfer to the County of Salvaged Equipment
(where applicable)
o Other requirements as mandated by the Agreement
o Optional construction (where applicable)
o FDOT Pre -Qualification is a requirement per Florida Statute 337.14 and rules of the State of Florida (Chapter 14-
22 F.A.C.)
In providing these services the Design -Builder shall, at all times, comply with the following:
• Design criteria and performance standards outlined in the Design Criteria Package
• Measures set forth in all approved permits issued by relevant agencies
• Design review/approval processes as detailed in this RFP - Step 2
• County and industry design and construction standards
GRADING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF FINAL RANKING:
For the development of a FINAL RANKING, this evaluation criterion will be utilized by the County's Selection
Committee to score and rank each proposal. Consultants are encouraged to keep their proposals concise and to include a
minimum of marketing materials. Proposals must address the following criteria:
STEP 2 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points
1. Technical Proposal 30 Points
2. Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) 50 Points
3. Oral Presentation 20 Points
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points
Tie Breaker: In the event of a tie at final ranking, award shall be made to the proposer with the lower volume of work
previously awarded. Volume of work shall be calculated based upon total dollars paid to the proposer in the twenty-four
(24) months prior to the RFP submittal deadline. Payment information will be retrieved from the County's financial
system of record. The tie breaking procedure is only applied in the final ranking step of the selection process and is
invoked by the Procurement Services Division Director or designee. In the event a tie still exists, selection will be
determined based on random selection by the Procurement Services Director before at least three (3) witnesses.
Each criterion and methodology for scoring is further described below.
EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (30 Total Points Available)
The Proposer shall provide the appropriate information in accordance with the content requirements set forth in this RFP -
Step 2. No reference to information or details of the Proposer's GMP shall be included in the Technical Proposal.
Proposers are advised that, if selected, as part of the contract preparation phase, portions of the information contained in
the Successful Proposal could be included or integrated in the Agreement as necessary. The County reserves the right to
include (or exclude) any information submitted in the Proposal in the final Agreement.
Section 1.0 - Transmittal Letter and Executive Summga (8 pages max.)
Together with its Proposal, the County must receive one original, fully executed Proposal Transmittal Letter from
the Proposer acknowledging, among other things, that the Proposer has completely reviewed, understands, and
agrees to be bound by the requirements of this RFP - Step 2 including all addenda. The transmittal letter shall
20-7811 Design Build Step — 2
Packet Pg. 1182
also clearly note receipt of all addenda (by addenda numbers) and shall list the principal contact person 16.A.24.c
Proposer, their phone number, email address, and street address.
The Proposal Transmittal Letter shall be executed by a representative of the Proposer who is empowered to sign it
and to commit the Proposer to the obligations contained in the Proposal. If the Proposer is a partnership, the
Proposal shall be signed by one or more of the general partners. If the Proposer is a corporation, an authorized
officer shall sign his or her name and indicate his or her title beneath the full corporate name. Anyone signing the
Proposal as an agent shall file with it legal evidence of his or her authority to execute such Proposal.
The Proposer shall submit a Project Executive Summary of the key aspects of the Proposal. The Project
Executive Summary should briefly describe the Proposers understanding of the County's goals and objectives for
the Project, provide notification of any changes to the Proposer's key team members, the Proposer's design -build
delivery plan, an overview of the design and construction plans, noise and odor abatement, management of
construction impacts to surrounding community, coordination of construction to minimize impact to maintenance
of operations, construction traffic control plan, site security plans, public outreach concepts, innovative
approaches to project design and/or delivery, demolition and restoration, and other significant aspects of the
Proposal. Small scale graphics and architectural renderings of the new and restored site may be incorporated into
the Project Executive Summary within the specified page limitations.
Section 2.0 — Project Team Approach (10 pages max)
This section of the Proposal shall describe the proposed approach the Proposer's Project Team will utilize to
address all facets of the project. A written overview should outline team aspects of overall delivery of this project,
addressing the team's approach to management, staffing and execution of the project with consideration given to
the location of key resources to accomplish the work. This section should include details on how the design -build
teams will address the significant personnel resources to complete the design and construction of the project and
within the proposed schedule. The Proposer should illustrate to the County how resources will be assigned and
managed to meet each phase and each major element of the project. A detailed project schedule should
accompany the information provided to outline the major tasks, relationships between the tasks, the resource
allocations by task, and considers all elements and requirements outlined in the Design Criteria Package and this
RFP — Step 2.
The Proposal shall include a Project Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule that presents the major activities
necessary to implement the D-B Project. The schedule should commence with the Notice to Proceed with Design
Date and extend to Final Completion, including distinct design, permitting, procurement, construction, etc. The
Proposer should indicate proposed task start and finish dates and key interim milestones. Proposers shall also
identify anticipated County actions and suggested County review periods during design. Proposer should discuss
items that may impact the critical path and how these items will be mitigated.
Proposers should recognize that the information provided in RFP — Step 1 was used as a basis for short -listing
Proposers. Therefore, any changes in any information in the Proposer's submittal including but not limited to
personnel, subcontractors, partners, and their personnel or financial capability of the Proposer, found to be
unacceptable by the County may result in disqualification of the Proposer, or a deduction in points as deemed
appropriate. Therefore, changes to the Proposer's project team, particularly the proposing entity, subcontractors,
and personnel, unless it is viewed by the County as an enhancement to the Project Team, shall not be allowed in
the step except for extenuating circumstances, such as corporate takeovers, buyouts, and other unforeseen
changes. If extenuating circumstances cause a change to the Proposer's team following shortlisting, the change
must be clearly identified in Section 3 of the Proposal, with a clear and complete explanation. Proposers may
enhance their teams at any time prior to submission of Proposals by adding additional personnel and
subcontractor members. Information on additional personnel will be included in the page limit for Section 3.
Section 3.0 - Technical Information (no page limit)
This section shall present the technical aspects of the Proposer's plan to implement the Project. The project
design and construction plans shall be in sufficient detail so that the County can ascertain the Proposer's ability to
comply with, the RFP — Step 2, including the Design Criteria Package and applicable regulatory requirements and
industry standards. Proposal text, which provides an explanation of a rationale behind the design, including
descriptions of the benefits of the proposed design shall be provided in narrative sections of the Proposal.
The Proposer shall provide a clear and detailed description of the Project. All major components shall be
described, including all infrastructure, site development, mitigation (if applicable), demolition and repurposing
and, access roads, and elements to address community impacts and permit requirements, as noted throughout the
20-7811 Design Build Step — 2
0
r
b
w
_
0
t�
c
0
L
C7
w
0
H
d
d
0
E
E
co
M
0
N
Packet Pg. 1183
RFP. The Proposer shall outline all technical elements that shall be included in order to demonstrate co 16.A.24.c
with the County standards and operational requirements.
Enhanced technical features that meet the Design Criteria and that the Proposer feels enhance the value of the
proposed Project, shall be described in this section of its Proposal.
EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 2: GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE (50 Total Points Available)
A Proposal submitted in response to this RFP - Step 2 shall contain a Guaranteed Maximum Price that fully
conforms with and satisfies the format and content requirements described herein and on Guaranteed
Maximum Price Form.
IF
O
The Guaranteed Maximum Price must be submitted separately in a sealed envelope and mail to:
U
N
C
O
V
PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION
ATTN: Lisa Oien
_
SOLICITATION #20-7811 Immdcalee Area Improvements - TIGER Grant
L
C9
3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2
w
NAPLES, FL 34112
H
d
d
EVALUATION CRITERIA NO.3: ORAL PRESENTATION (20 Total Points Available)
Y
All proposers invited to participate in this RFP — Step 2 will provide a thirty (30) minute oral presentation to the
O
E
selection commitee and allow for a fifteen (15) minute questions and answer period after. The content of the oral
presentation must be applicable to the submittal for this step with no disclosure of the total Guaranteed Maximum
M
Price. The proposer can discuss how the GMP was obtained; however, the final amount will be revealed at the
c
time of scoring.
v
Attachment 1— Design Criteria Package :
L 01 Minimum Technical Requirements _R11
L' 02_Requirements Traceability Verification Matrix_r027
L 03_Immokalee Complete Streets Project Layout Sheets _1101
L! 04a_Lighting Layout Sheets _R01
L 04b_Lighting Reference Information _R01
L 05_Bus Shelter Layout Sheets _R01
L 06a_CAT Transfer Facility Design Criteria Package_113
L 06b_CAT Transfer Facilty Conceptual Lighting Plans_R02
L 06c_CAT Transfer Facility Architectural Plans
L 06d_CAT Transfer Facility Master Report
L 07_Geotechnical Report _r01
Li 08_Permit Federal Transit Administration Immokalee Superstop Typel Categorical Exclusion
L 09_Permit FDOT Immokalee Complete Streets Project Type 1 Categorical Exclusion
L 10_Immokalee Stormwater Improvement Program -Nov 2018
L 11_Collier County Maintenance 2021_2023 Paving Plan
L 12_Immokalee Water Sewer District CIP
LI 13_Lighting Justification Report
L 14_FDOT District 01 Policy
20-7811 Design Build Step — 2
Packet Pg. 1184
Attachment 2 - Schedule :
16.A.24.c
I-`� 20-7811 - Attachment 2 - Estimated Project Budget
Attachment 3 - Federal Provisions, Certifications and Assurances :
20-7811 - Attachment 3a - EXH B — FTA Provisions and Assurances Pkg. 6.24
20-7811- Attachment 3b - Changes in Department of Labor Wage Determinations
20-7811 Design Build Step — 2
Packet Pg. 1185